{"meta":{"query_hash":"2ca9567f1ae6","filters":{"topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine"},"cohort_total":229,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":229,"exported":229,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2ca9567f1ae6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Property+Rights+and+Legal+Doctrine"},"results":[{"id":"W1137899428","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Environmental Law Without Congress","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Legislation; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01116708696339102,"score_gpt":0.2495980772184167,"score_spread":0.23843099025502568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1137899428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009925389,0.029139858,0.0023208675,0.20798841,0.06027978,0.00007006535,0.0010931264,0.00028326202,0.69783217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039527453,0.02820021,0.0024380747,0.22286014,0.08499343,0.0002296033,0.0010573342,0.00035751145,0.62033623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998588,0.00030872284,0.00006719653,0.00024722642,0.00063679554,0.00015209461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998083,0.0009949576,0.00011865475,0.00010281903,0.00055677455,0.00014373296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010594921,0.00056734757,0.00037737828,0.0011808054,0.002717145,0.005217566,0.0009023886,0.0062836674,0.06723549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034478055,0.00030396925,0.0005040841,0.0011576876,0.0029785223,0.004611402,0.002157345,0.006459574,0.019284444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004994765,0.000013657239,0.00006883418,0.00010268927,0.0000015591501,0.000053019903,0.00037434683,0.00003980186,0.00007840685,0.16647789,0.82209975,0.010685081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020349216,0.000006065301,0.00015731872,0.00013741055,0.0000012880009,0.00005002352,0.00015212891,0.000019725425,0.000030343517,0.013122064,0.9863175,0.000004089766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031803395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004162857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06723549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020356227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22492516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1178932211","doi":"","title":"Dissolving Condominium, Private Takings, and the Nature of Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Property (philosophy); Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Property rights; Property law; Private property; Political science; Business; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.02324628406985408,"score_gpt":0.278367712791918,"score_spread":0.25512142872206395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1178932211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3422876,0.009547562,0.024956228,0.0127449725,0.00023481905,0.0001248352,0.000140521,0.00008611013,0.60987735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96815777,0.0011355545,0.0019503911,0.0007929853,0.0000711831,0.000043966575,0.00003467448,0.000027060503,0.027786328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332523,0.0018237439,0.0003198805,0.0011536401,0.0019936499,0.0013839358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492645,0.002015682,0.000900932,0.0011390797,0.00058025704,0.00043769952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003825281,0.0002062055,0.00035165562,0.0011408031,0.008060909,0.010027823,0.0016417291,0.0022316829,0.0033236076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070605753,0.0004940138,0.00036010207,0.0015404666,0.039931078,0.0065829298,0.0038287297,0.0037186318,0.00027813224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011406631,0.000008301278,0.0022007613,0.000028792509,0.000003238558,0.00013692194,0.009789276,0.00012669743,0.00027094388,0.9731265,0.0013236379,0.012973589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000457955,0.00016662091,0.034620248,0.00082992145,0.000060944458,0.0009662643,0.029134125,0.0022162055,0.004059827,0.36642492,0.5613536,0.00012157077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20573589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33546594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20573589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014019108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009848684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40907675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124755466","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1195","title":"Putting Ethics into Environmental Law: Fiduciary Duties for Ethical Investment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Sustainability; Investment (military); Business ethics; Business; Capitalism; Environmental law; Finance; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.07829200082144241,"score_gpt":0.32889706847752354,"score_spread":0.25060506765608115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124755466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027456738,0.006468539,0.09243052,0.24119544,0.0020700528,0.00009706991,0.000048627455,0.00007962374,0.63015336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768212,0.002494517,0.02162796,0.05462066,0.0021379602,0.00028881352,0.000034060013,0.00008843253,0.04188644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853532,0.007782068,0.000549581,0.001031539,0.003932744,0.0013508371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895921,0.006700427,0.0008364211,0.0010847696,0.001336683,0.00044957385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155821545,0.00042020454,0.000453405,0.0010224554,0.0060768593,0.007545427,0.001229523,0.011699024,0.0023452577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020172408,0.0003937895,0.00065515697,0.0005909988,0.04487064,0.010080276,0.0056969407,0.012296401,0.0006496394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011128001,0.0000037397776,0.000037512065,0.0000040798586,5.420076e-7,0.000015656233,0.0005696048,0.000052003714,0.000027737799,0.99724245,0.0010303273,0.0010152817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008648933,0.000013649922,0.00012937156,0.000085311774,0.0000024853496,0.000049462753,0.00054295844,0.0003145158,0.00013079547,0.9484472,0.050263613,0.000011974244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036941587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003884969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0155821545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048523494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072090784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082407296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1409821377","doi":"","title":"Environmental water transactions under regulatory capitalism: The role of law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Environmental law; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008366319211789354,"score_gpt":0.18358449574521027,"score_spread":0.17521817653342092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1409821377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14896491,0.002683826,0.05964779,0.038885165,0.00025249892,0.00017995002,0.00008352092,0.000106971165,0.7491954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878578,0.00084040477,0.0024168526,0.0014732307,0.0001315556,0.000076050004,0.000017567449,0.00002136023,0.0071652536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99081135,0.0032921364,0.00020037433,0.0011478653,0.002313861,0.0022345432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921165,0.00463649,0.0010798337,0.00094873155,0.000819084,0.00039928028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008836428,0.000327743,0.0004874948,0.0014469946,0.004706802,0.014004214,0.001984418,0.0039250096,0.0040129684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013558055,0.00039350038,0.0006592997,0.0016355983,0.048480887,0.01224184,0.0055304314,0.005017306,0.0002930821],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040226805,0.0000058274622,0.00026286408,0.000007131423,0.0000024087255,0.000037857244,0.0007719188,0.0005808955,0.000043625645,0.9959818,0.0002885219,0.0020131185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002773174,0.00003151959,0.0017824551,0.00016744903,0.000018646373,0.00007677702,0.0019878694,0.003981918,0.0003751641,0.95457387,0.036945194,0.000031447773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030060714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014538946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030060714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126249725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016041901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091601074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147545885","doi":"10.29173/alr157","title":"What Happens When Developers Can't Develop: Can and Should Resource Developers be Compensated When They Can't Develop Their Assets?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Entitlement (fair division); Compensation (psychology); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Resource (disambiguation); Government (linguistics); Business; Action (physics); De facto; Public interest; Law; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.060295699518503755,"score_gpt":0.30012555645986083,"score_spread":0.23982985694135708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147545885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1578673,0.0066084717,0.011259521,0.34384534,0.0009820266,0.00006550619,0.00012639406,0.000087859495,0.47915763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95392084,0.0018845681,0.0012974037,0.02434998,0.0002644642,0.000045520443,0.00003463806,0.000040149436,0.01816242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99051744,0.00318397,0.00030280877,0.0009638921,0.0026578126,0.0023740558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98593813,0.006689172,0.0022009409,0.0010703959,0.0024509123,0.0016505237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009876278,0.00018127111,0.0003117218,0.001074514,0.0049225152,0.006870978,0.001314488,0.0066666068,0.0054457276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036318377,0.00024587603,0.00030993103,0.0006589329,0.018259069,0.008353779,0.0033330922,0.0040678596,0.0007935794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028827466,0.000054011314,0.012864036,0.000080553786,0.000022024766,0.0009843342,0.011587645,0.00036786846,0.0005596343,0.9116224,0.02839366,0.033434983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006142394,0.000093475246,0.01702444,0.00062400865,0.000049667633,0.0011598337,0.031868253,0.0008012441,0.0015070338,0.57998395,0.36672553,0.00010113101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028725438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035557527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97127455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005939791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012588072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05711651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485537388","doi":"","title":"Navigating the U.S. Transition to Sustainability: Matching National Governance Challenges With Appropriate Legal Tools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prosperity; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Sustainable development; Government (linguistics); Business; Reflexivity; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Environmental planning; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0403146735381893,"score_gpt":0.3014132238926715,"score_spread":0.2610985503544822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485537388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009168415,0.0051749013,0.011210379,0.91300255,0.0012314288,0.00012666671,0.000084921114,0.00012915107,0.059871648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6806618,0.015618359,0.06538396,0.22018273,0.0028583808,0.0014177341,0.00033489062,0.0002292342,0.013312907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98407793,0.008139484,0.0007993231,0.0012901091,0.0026333416,0.0030598117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760341,0.012827113,0.0018157449,0.0013933022,0.0035241891,0.0044055413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042535417,0.00075874844,0.00072397187,0.0030963055,0.020086227,0.03371768,0.004000491,0.019150624,0.005536272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056975234,0.00081828795,0.00079217856,0.0028146973,0.02813255,0.025940618,0.018214267,0.024228461,0.0008087392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013115991,0.00009437742,0.001223233,0.000092705086,0.000009538856,0.00017368582,0.0043521873,0.0012802163,0.00013102869,0.90264094,0.05687517,0.0331138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031345964,0.000058547674,0.0017602125,0.0014473632,0.0000150364585,0.00007277556,0.020914756,0.0021197507,0.00020030397,0.7965561,0.17675106,0.00007275766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056843463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09777899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056843463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019868921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08736778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22495145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489176446","doi":"","title":"New Owners in Their Own Land: Minerals and Inuit Land Claims","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Natural resource economics; History; Mining engineering; Geology; Economics","score_opus":0.03599617318962046,"score_gpt":0.2811255292031815,"score_spread":0.24512935601356106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489176446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91057664,0.0012907315,0.00013347463,0.008991015,0.000033471217,0.000010687908,0.00006592197,0.0000018900645,0.07889614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974349,0.00023889092,0.00001635529,0.00012631407,0.000011612491,0.0000025782201,0.000011808888,0.0000010192736,0.0021564346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983724,0.0003619713,0.000056764136,0.00010807565,0.00043527412,0.0006656462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923084,0.0042596543,0.0014550093,0.00018799155,0.00094669644,0.0008422345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021197088,0.00015201331,0.00038429463,0.0019550768,0.008388407,0.0075832824,0.0016852546,0.0039235894,0.008512953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012190491,0.00020072875,0.00022483745,0.003547454,0.010513865,0.0058935126,0.0032240546,0.0033371053,0.00024711623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027873425,0.00047025597,0.114400506,0.00012729077,0.000047040405,0.002139119,0.20950872,0.00049775006,0.00033076954,0.6453331,0.008608002,0.01825868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043216023,0.00008442008,0.17387246,0.00030211642,0.00010338245,0.00057327305,0.68342006,0.0019735103,0.00039132097,0.096544564,0.04261753,0.00007417675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45329693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7240835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5467031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01165501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077081616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9013169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500955749","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Sprawl of Big Box Retail: The Smart Growth Approach to 'Zone it and They Will Come' Development","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Smart growth; Zoning; Metropolitan area; Scope (computer science); Big data; Land use; Politics; Business; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034828966307864376,"score_gpt":0.2381315928267977,"score_spread":0.20330262651893333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500955749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3388891,0.0021782091,0.036131676,0.083643965,0.00013879631,0.0000874684,0.000038685674,0.00010171072,0.53879046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899194,0.00020850814,0.002055883,0.00125723,0.00001786383,0.00002238659,0.0000054798056,0.000008285465,0.0065048775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838376,0.0007689287,0.000037029713,0.00020161479,0.00027534095,0.00033339174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877495,0.00047781478,0.00013499189,0.00023585746,0.00016244678,0.00021390484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023834682,0.0001818932,0.00018599328,0.000512699,0.004994122,0.006165908,0.0008595679,0.0025726159,0.0030530305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024868953,0.0001571483,0.00024670354,0.0006255079,0.03220281,0.005917458,0.006755668,0.0026636093,0.00019871231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004881541,0.000007682409,0.00047483598,0.000010565408,0.0000018150093,0.000078577286,0.0042770654,0.00039578552,0.0001385102,0.98973584,0.0009539009,0.003920559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017582493,0.00003303654,0.001872618,0.000085852145,0.000006984794,0.0001287453,0.023311576,0.0023643929,0.00054474256,0.8651173,0.10649997,0.000017216078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072527593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019895906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072527593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044414965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040374408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03222549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503734802","doi":"","title":"The Role of the Courts in Shaping American Bankruptcy Law: Review of Debt's Dominion - A History of Bankruptcy Law in America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Debtor; Dominion; Creditor; Debt; Legislature; Law; Political science; Legislative history; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.01803228673400375,"score_gpt":0.2726189819555021,"score_spread":0.25458669522149835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503734802","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012955213,0.97288775,0.00020410956,0.011656223,0.0005617254,0.0000030107033,0.000009350935,0.000004514199,0.013377798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030140286,0.96049994,0.0002716524,0.005087141,0.001891863,0.000008105395,0.0000193157,0.000006358346,0.0020752253],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980635,0.0008508546,0.00013246322,0.00016947895,0.00060360436,0.00018012419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922282,0.0053601065,0.0005524588,0.00013177558,0.0014779508,0.00024943467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003378004,0.00032172413,0.00041084737,0.007080514,0.0027871246,0.0067029586,0.0007848387,0.003687781,0.0014840518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005455566,0.00039465463,0.00033469856,0.010756021,0.012243495,0.006154928,0.0013354651,0.004190199,0.000376061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037689788,0.00010029936,0.0033464625,0.0029424278,0.000050205264,0.0003507904,0.004750973,0.0009400977,0.00038963347,0.40136993,0.12561443,0.4601071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065749496,0.000037200174,0.005600093,0.004669972,0.00002576911,0.00022826738,0.0018934356,0.00017926432,0.00013149586,0.03125521,0.9559425,0.00003021124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026739279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07111199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026739279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067546284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075792605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053167284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517884536","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1417955","title":"A Principle of Abuse of Property Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Numerus clausus; Law and economics; Property rights; Law; Business; Political science; Property law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027346069395236358,"score_gpt":0.2742834323283129,"score_spread":0.24693736293307655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517884536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030420287,0.0024996588,0.20116872,0.028546542,0.0008056487,0.00013810102,0.0002699419,0.00013957162,0.73601156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159077,0.0008767082,0.030441433,0.007131364,0.0011486405,0.0004725072,0.000087883775,0.000104957646,0.043828785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856495,0.0062400233,0.0008681179,0.0024403688,0.0033008524,0.0015010478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844565,0.007686955,0.00088859326,0.0043623974,0.002065866,0.00053975557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012974728,0.0005304084,0.0015951989,0.0017818351,0.0061444775,0.0070617287,0.00207047,0.007133314,0.007670432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019959662,0.0008522885,0.0021968517,0.001329707,0.033510678,0.012484167,0.007098653,0.011429977,0.0017535558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025607492,0.0000024700435,0.000022141508,0.00000392037,0.0000018297116,0.0000084376,0.000116718,0.00003425124,0.000030177303,0.998926,0.00035514668,0.00049625844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010085308,0.000008733218,0.00006373922,0.000019509138,0.0000041698613,0.00007484132,0.00005972843,0.00020321934,0.00010365768,0.9906833,0.00876264,0.0000063113325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019903395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014363978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012974728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00257342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004131079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0686177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.040688476194232825,"score_gpt":0.2877428786015839,"score_spread":0.24705440240735105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518645978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17633674,0.017296042,0.0007421584,0.08954215,0.00041097446,0.000067923465,0.00014438349,0.000019199664,0.7154404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94308585,0.009002858,0.0005577777,0.015086882,0.00014125956,0.00004635551,0.00004568552,0.000015485804,0.03201781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898511,0.0012035766,0.00023093322,0.0006503452,0.0050103227,0.003053623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330163,0.0024274797,0.00046782644,0.0001870161,0.0026652187,0.00095086324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004862948,0.00022436996,0.0003478152,0.0025928481,0.019360894,0.006711307,0.0013539528,0.0036504015,0.0023260866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01259068,0.0003040426,0.00041217153,0.0029744457,0.016941845,0.002573153,0.0039769365,0.007050871,0.00013374139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031790005,0.0000269202,0.003238557,0.00007157378,0.000022051185,0.00043109385,0.010812654,0.00026386342,0.00036592322,0.95532024,0.013961456,0.015453974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013533173,0.000086465574,0.07450751,0.0010381971,0.00019044036,0.0005292358,0.031719927,0.001330658,0.0013934681,0.15995279,0.72883713,0.00027877218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96988523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06780376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06780376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121279135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49195302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522070982","doi":"","title":"The Hand is Invisible, Nature Knows Best, and Justice is Blind: Markets, Ecosystems, Legal Instrumentalism, and the Natural Law of Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Law and economics; Mandate; Multitude; Legislature; Political science; Environmental law; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.007356384662353332,"score_gpt":0.2637705096628919,"score_spread":0.25641412500053856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522070982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052287504,0.03392838,0.047922075,0.3989378,0.0013684713,0.000067236964,0.00011008803,0.0001334597,0.46524504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499702,0.0070699,0.0071255807,0.0165218,0.0011402331,0.00014265854,0.000040392864,0.00007376836,0.017915525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936718,0.0036109863,0.00014173868,0.0005858339,0.0012124762,0.0007771244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914801,0.0060463566,0.0008237734,0.00055798335,0.00057378376,0.00051793415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008611395,0.0005458765,0.00064661825,0.0020140852,0.008583708,0.015149521,0.0019097568,0.0074400823,0.0038373491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010936023,0.00044788548,0.0006021604,0.0018411848,0.084099986,0.021084266,0.0070415824,0.007296893,0.00045963045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004144233,0.000007886852,0.00009810082,0.000012003577,0.000001588337,0.000024240424,0.0007306629,0.00014522538,0.000014991913,0.99602854,0.0012013244,0.0017313942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005307314,0.000005134752,0.00010251539,0.00005497808,0.0000020130428,0.000022505623,0.0006550712,0.00030738037,0.000033053784,0.9867474,0.012057805,0.000006872014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009381439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059324834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015149521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008117672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008418879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05889815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526106016","doi":"","title":"Local Climate Change Law: Environmental Regulation in Cities and Other Localities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Climate governance; Local government; Indigenous; Corporate governance; Political science; Political economy of climate change; Environmental governance; Greenhouse gas; Geography; Global warming; Public administration; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.022798857999407455,"score_gpt":0.19636250268650493,"score_spread":0.17356364468709748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526106016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011084851,0.011571882,0.004290317,0.021337846,0.00052475906,0.000055831144,0.000096481366,0.00013454877,0.9509036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37448868,0.006675649,0.0017506971,0.006165922,0.0004897984,0.00016398454,0.00016543518,0.00010314717,0.6099967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993563,0.0001999127,0.00001905799,0.00008530502,0.00021796659,0.00012137396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966013,0.000099998215,0.00003591942,0.000054104094,0.00009235359,0.00005752862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080896117,0.00023888653,0.0002824832,0.0005684242,0.0036658533,0.0053370176,0.0011766461,0.0020793483,0.009012333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011551711,0.00020376164,0.0003246936,0.001718487,0.0082282415,0.0034488973,0.0029941325,0.002648171,0.0014967922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000436318,0.000017303924,0.00037901837,0.000056036177,0.0000026862192,0.00007780505,0.0053577926,0.0005258459,0.00011023581,0.925136,0.05073128,0.017601632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007863479,0.000016414255,0.0023609493,0.00028711604,0.000008703182,0.00012243578,0.0062738084,0.0006896429,0.0001897761,0.11147264,0.87855387,0.000016779744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041447684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062081557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041447684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062741316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005293972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0824129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526265844","doi":"","title":"Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Legislation; Business; Natural resource economics; Reversing; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Agricultural economics; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02805671331928468,"score_gpt":0.27494025672157224,"score_spread":0.24688354340228758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526265844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019176304,0.014752989,0.009126101,0.075582385,0.0008955605,0.00020074511,0.00024056331,0.00013528616,0.8798901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31254184,0.011992774,0.005972277,0.016058603,0.00067090854,0.0001445176,0.00015252503,0.00007735425,0.65238917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985612,0.00023062191,0.00004058508,0.0002003137,0.00063995266,0.00032738745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990268,0.0002916866,0.00008878013,0.00019481224,0.00028969056,0.000108370725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019125812,0.00034940912,0.00027734338,0.00088448205,0.005291363,0.0050788876,0.0015992366,0.0033433742,0.0076324954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002297453,0.0003436145,0.00040931243,0.0014882634,0.014770537,0.002588617,0.0020630695,0.0048553664,0.00050238724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069001603,0.000025354866,0.00061679963,0.00004390882,0.000007339077,0.000054120144,0.0034645286,0.0012889495,0.00042730797,0.95550764,0.024793258,0.013763862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003162087,0.000018550167,0.006648924,0.00026082495,0.000024016439,0.000050602244,0.002340178,0.0012700652,0.0006193662,0.20108046,0.7876259,0.00002952284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8379803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92753255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8379803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04006189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050581727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32594776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531883695","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1938745","title":"Re-Inventing Governance Using the Laws of Nature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.0322117716230404,"score_gpt":0.2924414276384237,"score_spread":0.2602296560153833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531883695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15875095,0.001405053,0.2857252,0.023124613,0.0005581732,0.00020149598,0.00009808365,0.0002380551,0.52989835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710499,0.0002674331,0.011085147,0.0008859406,0.00010656436,0.000074693555,0.00001685482,0.000044856006,0.016468573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99350065,0.002830534,0.000382591,0.001442456,0.0010588084,0.00078504713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783659,0.008846535,0.001620638,0.009237552,0.0012776586,0.00065158634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013167322,0.00030839627,0.0006116859,0.001009332,0.0020628055,0.0065651354,0.0014158174,0.0034368595,0.0050418777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023001587,0.0003444581,0.00075858727,0.0006419503,0.017193848,0.008952954,0.0044503123,0.004349765,0.00050939416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003951689,0.000009435414,0.0002623813,0.0000069800994,0.0000048169604,0.000017547065,0.0002992619,0.00062000856,0.00012085787,0.9955323,0.0002803771,0.0028420785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010463054,0.00001175711,0.0002732253,0.000024392633,0.0000054862676,0.000022777584,0.00016977263,0.0016783017,0.00023146156,0.9869414,0.010623999,0.000006867534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026080122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003922997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013167322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029877324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047512003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069636285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533708772","doi":"","title":"Water as a Public Commodity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Doctrine; Obligation; Theme (computing); Public trust doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public interest; State (computer science); Business; Principal (computer security); Political science; Law; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.12089439144847657,"score_gpt":0.31460671234548176,"score_spread":0.19371232089700519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533708772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016905775,0.02210555,0.01612853,0.24664117,0.0014666219,0.00006960746,0.000145555,0.00006670472,0.69647044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76461375,0.01954967,0.00495635,0.07133179,0.0052017155,0.00027855855,0.00012778494,0.00009224628,0.13384816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949863,0.0017476245,0.00017042209,0.00081543426,0.0016894653,0.00059069635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996896,0.0017952537,0.00028323862,0.0003306185,0.0005335269,0.00016144177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048639886,0.00026275538,0.0004246192,0.0012235763,0.0042125466,0.009072126,0.0010201271,0.00811037,0.007460668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070491247,0.0003097972,0.0005401277,0.0011705924,0.019455029,0.010381777,0.0044687786,0.00519387,0.0010891743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010743269,0.000004027917,0.000028846069,0.000015056877,8.199404e-7,0.000013354534,0.00023439221,0.00004100201,0.00003148936,0.9952062,0.0028627662,0.0015609057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010549429,0.000028414193,0.00021277199,0.00017825013,0.000006533663,0.00005761477,0.0007377476,0.00024289581,0.00023253365,0.6915607,0.30672237,0.0000096028825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007718242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062942933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009072126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056169196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009067043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04075378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535343897","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1077","title":"Ecosystem Management in Question: A Reply to Ruhl","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Environmental ethics; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem management; Ecosystem; Political science; Sociology; Ecology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.011929284005226658,"score_gpt":0.26713440144796996,"score_spread":0.2552051174427433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535343897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013605274,0.0018977872,0.00010107004,0.9948139,0.0019031737,0.000001859718,0.000005143531,0.000008018431,0.001133066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004448162,0.0012959891,0.00020322902,0.98639095,0.0044307373,0.000020932546,0.000006155055,0.000020214491,0.0031835951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866497,0.0061705247,0.00067333557,0.002087546,0.0030953798,0.0013235146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97034574,0.022840014,0.0011209409,0.0007565456,0.0033334196,0.0016033951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020330805,0.0012060916,0.0020518983,0.0013356437,0.012961012,0.013965885,0.006460168,0.08483442,0.0065711685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046968386,0.0009856866,0.0013277151,0.0017030337,0.03308572,0.026647368,0.010756777,0.072135806,0.0028846818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013920994,0.000026989897,0.00016706907,0.000059645634,0.000007674454,0.00016377767,0.002458314,0.000079106896,0.0000465924,0.081581146,0.90918136,0.0062144357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007586293,0.000044364166,0.00048235923,0.00076159486,0.00001742456,0.0003091794,0.007861224,0.00033403718,0.00020558864,0.11529012,0.8745247,0.00009353065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144027155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01704865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08483442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008262251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015296856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10752082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557764441","doi":"","title":"Expropriation and the Socio-Economic Status of Neighbourhoods in Canada: Equal Sharing of the Public Interest Burden?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Public interest; Socioeconomics; Geography; Demographic economics; Development economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.23862767094439927,"score_gpt":0.49371966594129846,"score_spread":0.25509199499689916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557764441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86821353,0.0044117696,0.00041885974,0.027235165,0.000107205946,0.000048257356,0.001073906,0.000018950497,0.09847239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98921704,0.0011708649,0.0001673948,0.00054334593,0.000009588946,0.000007083094,0.00011287884,0.000006254911,0.008765543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998209,0.0000905355,0.000036340563,0.00010386066,0.0004435517,0.0011168506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970319,0.00017097405,0.00037996806,0.00010452122,0.0011550554,0.0011575883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009883916,0.00013497089,0.00031664906,0.001481003,0.012273604,0.005711296,0.0018223849,0.001031537,0.0061728167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031847793,0.00016933017,0.000404897,0.0031242098,0.0062024,0.0016654981,0.0033869268,0.0020655938,0.0002353002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002227782,0.00021817278,0.47217035,0.0002873261,0.00010184434,0.0018201269,0.08610157,0.0016865936,0.00073777244,0.26708,0.037709977,0.13186346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017613911,0.0000368427,0.75529593,0.00050611363,0.000050365583,0.00025197663,0.13483126,0.0012192042,0.0002921467,0.007876479,0.09948922,0.00013281022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99736255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99919623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08663935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08663935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102274455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62861544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560945108","doi":"","title":"A Regulatory Quick Fix for Carcieri v. Salazar: How the Department of Interior Can Invoke an Alternative Source of Existing Statutory Authority to Overcome an Adverse Judgment Under the Chevron Doctrine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Statutory law; Doctrine; Legislation; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.22619924120204335,"score_gpt":0.3938734833854143,"score_spread":0.16767424218337093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560945108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020614604,0.0057191234,0.08719124,0.32930717,0.00850719,0.00066695036,0.00020933754,0.002228687,0.54555565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57313377,0.0032449136,0.09042759,0.21830316,0.0033046375,0.0015298928,0.00025384527,0.0012201405,0.10858198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746967,0.009810384,0.00089765515,0.0044199517,0.006144251,0.004030974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814077,0.010830478,0.0008300056,0.0024393478,0.0027768796,0.001715694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04472075,0.0011957114,0.00097069156,0.0025338805,0.014213237,0.029058121,0.00790427,0.027490526,0.017163262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05324104,0.0016826751,0.002271386,0.001039562,0.020623667,0.019082122,0.013794645,0.03385694,0.005223373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042497984,0.000082885854,0.000403798,0.00005046823,0.000022027927,0.0003534142,0.0022425994,0.00075444,0.00060616276,0.9221402,0.05993327,0.013368287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021507299,0.00020678635,0.00055408315,0.00078489527,0.0000932573,0.00026248433,0.004085251,0.002919983,0.0016997944,0.42533037,0.56354403,0.0003040003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023367567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03587318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04472075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013122049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027988652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23650879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562561535","doi":"","title":"Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Property rights; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03211227064352791,"score_gpt":0.3196289523413421,"score_spread":0.2875166816978142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562561535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006867571,0.023292487,0.0017725662,0.028011123,0.00033189356,0.000011327369,0.000057763824,0.000012977483,0.9396423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7870585,0.032953434,0.0025336882,0.013392328,0.0014599549,0.00017424008,0.00020775438,0.00010034223,0.16211976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965533,0.0017400421,0.00010213422,0.00035127645,0.0007578192,0.0004954189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754024,0.0016742295,0.00018579094,0.00023419545,0.00026726632,0.000098309974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037330538,0.0004981841,0.00042803644,0.0028673115,0.005811578,0.009154887,0.0010818286,0.0038772046,0.012076457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045226854,0.00022859385,0.00057553744,0.0042092474,0.018895226,0.009611926,0.002508609,0.0043257847,0.00077166664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024564642,0.0000047808276,0.000056250457,0.000013839512,9.143769e-7,0.000011445173,0.0008209588,0.000050063267,0.000018948653,0.9933576,0.003085225,0.0025774923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013966282,0.00003153416,0.0013450444,0.00064021134,0.000013775571,0.00009281116,0.00773796,0.00027529054,0.0003153192,0.5104043,0.47911227,0.000017555521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015266962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020290932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015266962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009646371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004807245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06998962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572082001","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.303619","title":"Biotechnology's Uncertainty Principle","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0139419027844496,"score_gpt":0.2860678836544981,"score_spread":0.27212598087004847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572082001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01845647,0.0043972326,0.08529503,0.08796938,0.0010529174,0.000105910716,0.0003484944,0.00010790922,0.8022668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89753526,0.00213656,0.011984637,0.025283176,0.0024051478,0.00040517762,0.00012692303,0.0000758723,0.060047254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304456,0.0017619624,0.0002304559,0.0011817935,0.0031130484,0.00066808943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878165,0.009189556,0.00059318624,0.0012704763,0.0008472176,0.0002830175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008276908,0.0006268982,0.0010513423,0.0014224064,0.002529465,0.0052918023,0.0015223998,0.0101543525,0.009491449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021796731,0.00050839974,0.0012776058,0.00085939094,0.012695281,0.00811396,0.004137399,0.007073474,0.0014395982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049679156,0.0000045110437,0.000021928943,0.000009238723,0.0000036645824,0.000012433696,0.000044910088,0.00025269552,0.000032072323,0.9965888,0.0015880913,0.0014365329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036120232,0.0000029855757,0.000024087172,0.000010902188,0.0000019043504,0.000013441583,0.000010188991,0.00022324643,0.000060543363,0.99430376,0.005342857,0.0000025267623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010742745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006651389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0101543525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029031923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026387963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043772995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579452098","doi":"","title":"Some implications of William Blackstone's Biblical grounding of property rights for American jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Jurisprudence; Theology; Hegelianism; Humanities; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07677169333376033,"score_gpt":0.34130558788497706,"score_spread":0.26453389455121673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579452098","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011437013,0.034246568,0.002765193,0.6030963,0.0024877388,0.000019269532,0.000055091557,0.00002024661,0.3458725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71162146,0.0262712,0.0027868052,0.14438617,0.008093152,0.00021744524,0.0000680495,0.00011045072,0.10644528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394387,0.003240345,0.00014904948,0.000653785,0.0013776892,0.00063531846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303997,0.0049268394,0.00036725326,0.00028020004,0.001054815,0.00033103378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069642304,0.00045106804,0.0006337391,0.0029356552,0.016426891,0.012250878,0.0015322616,0.0066266363,0.0059357383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156136835,0.0004122391,0.00030218702,0.003852693,0.04727886,0.012501308,0.0042742696,0.010807952,0.00069427176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044859817,0.0000069835114,0.000057031823,0.000011165219,9.214627e-7,0.000025644822,0.003980501,0.00002583026,0.000009983375,0.98347837,0.010467943,0.0019311446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019106441,0.000008938431,0.00046295548,0.00027627574,0.0000033155472,0.0000437174,0.0049320003,0.00010548858,0.00006427788,0.65767133,0.33639693,0.00001573082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043862473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038712464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043862473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011776333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073479726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08721429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581848193","doi":"","title":"What the New Liberal Government Should Know About \"Public Property and the PublicTrust in New Brunswick\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05605066347721069,"score_gpt":0.2880998511225479,"score_spread":0.2320491876453372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581848193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0944478,0.01570057,0.0006505168,0.7727412,0.001012023,0.000029653578,0.00017244199,0.000014381784,0.11523139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89144766,0.008379979,0.0005398496,0.06468136,0.0003477584,0.000046026893,0.000068994465,0.000028215267,0.03446017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590296,0.0011479252,0.00013127374,0.00035694762,0.0004403885,0.002020588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991634,0.004837864,0.0007865606,0.00043569994,0.0011522317,0.0011536248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00520545,0.00027378954,0.0005427982,0.0013113737,0.012260766,0.016206034,0.0020761369,0.008842853,0.009602334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016103448,0.0004314754,0.00039970074,0.0027967454,0.021420596,0.018873723,0.0038678637,0.012562292,0.0004042895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044848945,0.00002683657,0.0035591694,0.000098950324,0.0000134457805,0.0005259206,0.01461326,0.00031469238,0.00018249998,0.944597,0.02158061,0.0144427065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068528665,0.00002709303,0.022205492,0.0016038608,0.00005598473,0.0002424289,0.087040395,0.0004962122,0.0007064419,0.38786104,0.49947762,0.00021487147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8598234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91303396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1401766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073258705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09223923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5315316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585106935","doi":"","title":"First Possession Beyond the Law: Adults' and Young Children's Intuitions About Ownership","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006829426263310092,"score_gpt":0.2487262750853927,"score_spread":0.2418968488220826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585106935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592776,0.0025372815,0.0052850074,0.0014114907,0.00002898932,0.000022412258,0.00014435219,0.000051991374,0.031240795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99655175,0.00072798034,0.0014201888,0.00017886492,0.000007083095,0.000008621314,0.00006621014,0.000010055,0.0010291709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899656,0.00024348473,0.0000899128,0.0001960147,0.0003287334,0.00014530709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912788,0.005640266,0.0014591077,0.0005448908,0.00061671314,0.0004601491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033905194,0.00026645858,0.00034325107,0.0009360554,0.00059178565,0.0035623582,0.0005246513,0.0013483642,0.0043578055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013938017,0.0006130677,0.0004974844,0.00046547566,0.006653528,0.0087262625,0.0018130627,0.0021054437,0.00065128034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050809863,0.00033012324,0.24177511,0.0006103921,0.0000903859,0.004053306,0.41876912,0.0020604301,0.012912445,0.23652321,0.003676017,0.07869143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014628099,0.0007528799,0.37121132,0.0011511544,0.0002037969,0.01009274,0.140727,0.0062494944,0.0071017216,0.40103102,0.06098513,0.00034755736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005478043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065429932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005478043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010949402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008588061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017930984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606613292","doi":"","title":"Specific Relief for Ancient Deprivations of Property","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Indigenous; Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Proposition; Property rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06401731565646324,"score_gpt":0.30354163663472744,"score_spread":0.2395243209782642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606613292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2798817,0.00423912,0.011422949,0.020978343,0.0002851353,0.000048021866,0.00008115651,0.000048686736,0.6830149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97414434,0.0008243905,0.0008575044,0.0017696567,0.00012861768,0.000016943108,0.00002662654,0.000009018416,0.02222287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977986,0.00043739247,0.000119993696,0.00030021707,0.0007673011,0.0005764148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883217,0.0003844978,0.00017979626,0.00026022727,0.00023525588,0.000108033484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020914178,0.000171655,0.00034922446,0.00089153484,0.0053874287,0.0032040088,0.0009281788,0.002702965,0.0050504073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004049058,0.00020805521,0.00038087866,0.0007265236,0.01839672,0.0035990376,0.006093188,0.0037402252,0.00044809876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000792858,0.000011782214,0.00079293054,0.000030453642,0.000007092879,0.00031512248,0.0041869245,0.00026037166,0.00032896522,0.98828506,0.0014274867,0.004345811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003348987,0.0001712515,0.011676261,0.0005713852,0.0000527576,0.0018530545,0.0154786315,0.0012532392,0.0015007079,0.694401,0.27293503,0.000073120005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008904101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021709321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008904101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026880365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026811704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019503176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615100587","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Idea of Private Property: A Small Step Along the Road from Common Sense to Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Property (philosophy); Sense (electronics); Private property; Epistemology; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04045536146510969,"score_gpt":0.24250752604577605,"score_spread":0.20205216458066635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1615100587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20425141,0.0070833433,0.26410055,0.21781994,0.0002988035,0.00009295092,0.00016277199,0.0001256246,0.30606455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790046,0.0013362747,0.013408921,0.0016201115,0.00007158356,0.000046372523,0.000029131874,0.000049735892,0.0044333753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966323,0.0021510015,0.00006635178,0.0002973425,0.00046737786,0.00038574325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925297,0.005402463,0.00033097793,0.001037224,0.00032888335,0.00037079683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052592107,0.00039312712,0.0010078183,0.0018645285,0.0048280326,0.013434207,0.0018973688,0.0041259956,0.0071436684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008208692,0.0003626924,0.0008565942,0.002458565,0.07309129,0.032680113,0.008621419,0.0074268184,0.00039251128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026254388,0.000005061872,0.0000929389,0.000010289168,0.000001694469,0.000021403546,0.002016187,0.00012878234,0.00003351699,0.99620605,0.00022077965,0.0012606578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027067153,0.000004313291,0.00011325238,0.000024643055,0.0000017613639,0.00002793772,0.0030932883,0.0005252893,0.00003781542,0.9895399,0.006626166,0.0000028540942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011535433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013845673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013434207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007199215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074296594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052234173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677036363","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i58.1158","title":"On Uprooting and Rerooting: Reflections on the Columbia River Project","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Agency (philosophy); Feeling; Compensation (psychology); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.0822073746875948,"score_gpt":0.3651381113061651,"score_spread":0.28293073661857027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1677036363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60166836,0.0057098498,0.0013722064,0.17686163,0.002037724,0.0002424138,0.00009924033,0.00009500071,0.21191357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.885965,0.0041197813,0.00061312836,0.021053452,0.0003076754,0.0001245574,0.000052359836,0.00016107506,0.087603025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869465,0.005603237,0.00016835885,0.0004710337,0.0026365444,0.0041744113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914335,0.0038644741,0.00040801434,0.0002431326,0.0013795334,0.0026714546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007601041,0.0008823558,0.00059406785,0.0018207637,0.075448796,0.012925041,0.004741922,0.010164624,0.006047654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139949,0.00083565264,0.00039805422,0.0033555164,0.03578926,0.0057001538,0.01379576,0.021075012,0.00064005033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017268781,0.000055859473,0.0008430854,0.000065948414,0.000004360914,0.0026398294,0.9492961,0.00007903062,0.0005065802,0.011020241,0.026786424,0.008685215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028265306,0.00001213059,0.00091597554,0.000101482015,0.0000027392357,0.00013117353,0.90995157,0.000030506657,0.000114444214,0.0006140427,0.088102624,0.000020414078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7386103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8765601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04397575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049263448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52585804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174695633","doi":"","title":"Equality and urbanism : an inquiry on egalitarian ethics in planning with a particular reference to the public consultation policy and the overdale approach to equal land-use opportunities of the Montreal Citizen's movement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Public administration; Politics; Redevelopment; Political science; Urban planning; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.20611867739244782,"score_gpt":0.37928041737897716,"score_spread":0.17316173998652934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174695633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20468129,0.003704232,0.050016757,0.12654106,0.00032942038,0.00029582085,0.00005643729,0.000043699954,0.61433125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98517597,0.0004481359,0.003273134,0.0039574755,0.000069094545,0.00023237868,0.000007721999,0.000024681687,0.006811457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92956436,0.05965208,0.00048285094,0.0015228125,0.0045524416,0.0042255432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972741,0.022291215,0.0015006136,0.0011649808,0.0013336269,0.0009684939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03289976,0.00063061836,0.0006509837,0.0013859319,0.018899744,0.014433384,0.002539637,0.006000867,0.0029787463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028461918,0.00046266182,0.0005301319,0.0019417041,0.13764511,0.010221392,0.01054704,0.006770456,0.0001878148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000677383,0.000014845269,0.00038118064,0.000017541683,0.000002943174,0.00004925931,0.02102695,0.0005525724,0.00003389979,0.9748854,0.0007305729,0.0022980846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003742786,0.00006562758,0.0025254353,0.00020949535,0.000012434955,0.00007700013,0.05780859,0.0015758921,0.00048220734,0.85280985,0.08434874,0.000047257065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087858886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10343585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9121411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027745916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021040926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20131165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834777629","doi":"10.21083/surg.v5i1.1337","title":"“The quarry proposed by St Marys Cement Inc. for a location near Carlisle, Ontario should not be permitted” : Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SURG Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Proposition; Law; Environmental law; Political science; Sociology; Operations research; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08482371175819023,"score_gpt":0.29118255700089946,"score_spread":0.20635884524270923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834777629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068394646,0.0059411502,0.0051406566,0.12024304,0.010765695,0.0011569428,0.002984559,0.00028522173,0.78508806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33097357,0.0041476055,0.005406439,0.022607045,0.0024837395,0.0003660097,0.00094739744,0.00012699711,0.63294125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785763,0.00020245086,0.0001173317,0.0002795117,0.0012259204,0.00031712145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774456,0.0006625685,0.00017273838,0.00009236114,0.0010867073,0.0002410606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016611147,0.0004234728,0.00026227406,0.0006160479,0.005954506,0.0034336238,0.0012125185,0.0057367706,0.02115476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035486459,0.00040465157,0.0003052587,0.0005451028,0.0028886304,0.0009721257,0.00093728467,0.0033825259,0.0031509283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007213655,0.00009549944,0.0038201162,0.00040881117,0.000014532423,0.0014337826,0.012477244,0.00040061094,0.0058248066,0.11700083,0.8353285,0.023123091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015974043,0.000051479594,0.0071720746,0.00016476047,0.0000060278194,0.00015840946,0.004690482,0.00015308,0.0010475694,0.0032443092,0.9832634,0.000032543507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33022183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60930043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66977817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017263822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013618408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65659946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834797527","doi":"","title":"A Case Study on the Legal Impacts of Corporate Sustainability Pledges in the Alberta Oil Sands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Sustainability; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Asphalt","score_opus":0.074646981191422,"score_gpt":0.33936716133451783,"score_spread":0.26472018014309584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834797527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7201003,0.0015969714,0.0030716097,0.018200053,0.00014862182,0.00031340565,0.00015011698,0.000047545178,0.25637138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96518755,0.0009830322,0.001769409,0.002272857,0.000042756878,0.00005348286,0.000060898685,0.000010924043,0.029618995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299604,0.00206996,0.00012560858,0.00034934605,0.002243319,0.0022157577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944753,0.0031199756,0.0003429199,0.00020997516,0.00093872094,0.0009130992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004876623,0.0004892423,0.00032875285,0.0016715722,0.025051465,0.004933367,0.0029256286,0.0077038812,0.004399584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006436937,0.00045910693,0.0005706798,0.001990601,0.00740431,0.0017808006,0.0030760702,0.0054367273,0.00025606842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003205857,0.0017416957,0.058343243,0.00029717427,0.00008975195,0.09022843,0.09933978,0.01307255,0.0044621946,0.62635523,0.053878862,0.05187054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027390115,0.0006395413,0.061693836,0.00092761073,0.00027982568,0.014739396,0.4514154,0.021339986,0.0071062753,0.026179051,0.4150144,0.00039077524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8226174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9413598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17738259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0465071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037186243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35685444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850908651","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.501462","title":"Loggers vs. Campers: Compensation for the Taking of Property Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02604270437387943,"score_gpt":0.29128966900202985,"score_spread":0.2652469646281504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850908651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37281424,0.0011915506,0.0077897473,0.08326192,0.0008110127,0.00027135256,0.0003961931,0.00023501956,0.533229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94811517,0.0001405483,0.00047877946,0.0031833593,0.00023150012,0.00005565978,0.00004039103,0.000031468535,0.04772322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98806316,0.0031168384,0.0005596007,0.0013795635,0.0033461284,0.003534732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774827,0.012140177,0.004055095,0.003201272,0.0016842055,0.0014364932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011944981,0.00045642685,0.0008298371,0.0017109131,0.005162723,0.0074442704,0.002833187,0.014526368,0.044648457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044636156,0.00049211574,0.00069463404,0.0014973248,0.0060489923,0.0063123484,0.0039269975,0.0073164757,0.0031491332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000555486,0.00030804612,0.0160458,0.00008575917,0.00006033416,0.0009712187,0.0052824114,0.00063309306,0.0008527705,0.8793167,0.05237961,0.04350873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011152175,0.000837356,0.06733259,0.00067050924,0.00044093464,0.00259988,0.024835518,0.011365659,0.0052121,0.67548764,0.20974079,0.00036182228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013314744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023739012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044648457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046581686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.149364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861684145","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2026088","title":"Yet Another Function for the Numerus Clausus Principle of Property Rights, and a Useful One at That","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Function (biology); Law; Mathematics; Business; Property law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04267826229504205,"score_gpt":0.2826181477099428,"score_spread":0.23993988541490077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861684145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0118633555,0.0036294267,0.23856568,0.108323,0.0056656925,0.00012571015,0.0005074289,0.0005207687,0.6307989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62170804,0.0027806542,0.101545446,0.03507408,0.0064102598,0.0006361791,0.00035739067,0.00068010745,0.23080789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757916,0.0007770305,0.00013963087,0.000679065,0.0005513582,0.00027386122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971565,0.0010916292,0.00020378025,0.00072239724,0.00063696795,0.00018867344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003889803,0.00066649966,0.0009787715,0.001767305,0.0053670597,0.0070045786,0.0018436795,0.0059220516,0.019812115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009680492,0.00036631915,0.0014976193,0.0012298457,0.01854101,0.015673349,0.003377338,0.007292988,0.004734081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005035926,0.0000030596564,0.00003560813,0.000010136738,0.0000020785958,0.0000106908155,0.000088415,0.000025142343,0.00004742526,0.9958407,0.0025524765,0.0013792453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011665053,0.000009601966,0.000087636785,0.000024054723,0.0000048747665,0.00006630938,0.000080028934,0.00024905376,0.00017486162,0.9652874,0.03399191,0.000012780704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032911692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002846807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019812115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034039402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041907025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0662781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19482909","doi":"10.1177/0748233709105270","title":"The Concept of the Anticommons: Useful, or Ubiquitous and Unnecessary?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gridlock; Law and economics; Private property; Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Public property; Political science; Business; Property rights; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013672553701438446,"score_gpt":0.2627536908293838,"score_spread":0.24908113712794538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19482909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025589067,0.21554372,0.017967986,0.645296,0.03112566,0.00005977786,0.00013235283,0.0002268919,0.064058505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54041404,0.108643815,0.014094429,0.2804238,0.032628413,0.00019022299,0.00011020712,0.00021204985,0.023283105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925358,0.0043121534,0.0003882041,0.0008759827,0.0014431492,0.00044470822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98756546,0.006484819,0.0014824128,0.0012605917,0.0018398499,0.0013669227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008818487,0.00075425365,0.001144862,0.0016865106,0.0027864724,0.005349636,0.002276813,0.006581246,0.0032411967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014063872,0.00031626833,0.0005543219,0.0011241024,0.050743125,0.012705793,0.004598473,0.00877847,0.0012383985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004578276,0.00020589023,0.01344687,0.0022303767,0.000185305,0.0025785724,0.0143277785,0.00023991709,0.0021763728,0.57804924,0.112608165,0.27349377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049032966,0.0005304443,0.0047507095,0.0019561786,0.000096733245,0.0067600636,0.011113401,0.00029895754,0.000925885,0.28726983,0.68613,0.00011878869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002343237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031017752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008818487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023426185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043789553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046637177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976046325","doi":"10.2753/jei0021-3624460302","title":"A Review and Assessment of the Heirs' Property Issue in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Economic Issues","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12920807898685752,"score_gpt":0.4290147021253737,"score_spread":0.29980662313851614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976046325","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000115706156,0.99870324,0.000035297675,0.00025601493,0.00008109632,0.0000023487962,0.000010550202,0.0000012083418,0.00079444656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008001669,0.99881196,0.000055379947,0.00012063652,0.00006142759,0.000002175163,0.000012205406,3.451455e-7,0.00013570658],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995554,0.00010723713,0.0000800153,0.000055332024,0.00017611367,0.000025864367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793243,0.0012447184,0.00028121422,0.000030549058,0.00044322666,0.000067789624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011964634,0.00060097844,0.0014028904,0.0066667935,0.000477722,0.0014079369,0.0008075251,0.001286716,0.0028475435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028290234,0.0004112588,0.00066421524,0.010523936,0.00072903145,0.00188291,0.00064290175,0.0011185936,0.0005275302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059255894,0.00006605286,0.0006049464,0.078810155,0.00026019115,0.00027033055,0.00034463074,0.0006940515,0.000650957,0.0100917285,0.053773183,0.8543745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010988793,0.00008737312,0.0042587603,0.047178295,0.0004076671,0.00055975723,0.00040886336,0.0001222551,0.0002656566,0.0034160055,0.9432552,0.000029190402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075421324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01734417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075421324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013626711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045578224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014996469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976445175","doi":"10.12957/rqi.2012.9867","title":"A TEORIA POLÍTICA DA PROPRIEDADE NA ERA MODERNA: ASCENSÃO E CRÍTICA DO INDIVIDUALISMO POSSESSIVO / A POLITICAL THEORY OF PROPERTY IN THE MODERN ERA: RISE AND CRITIC OF POSSESSIVE INDIVIDUALISM","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Individualism; Politics; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05241774594116107,"score_gpt":0.33858994964594574,"score_spread":0.2861722037047847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976445175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16537474,0.023331713,0.009709333,0.20692265,0.0009471044,0.000027171209,0.00005078148,0.000040457657,0.59359616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987818,0.003129101,0.0004143397,0.00141461,0.00031182307,0.000011924445,0.0000061430505,0.000014066223,0.0068799206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602973,0.0023251227,0.00011361809,0.0004353147,0.0007441829,0.00035202462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919369,0.005025271,0.0011300845,0.0006115853,0.0008451314,0.0004510214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008162844,0.00021148776,0.00038588533,0.00197301,0.00432982,0.009355117,0.00078962056,0.003056744,0.0051650894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071769906,0.00025159353,0.0003903587,0.0020745343,0.034446236,0.008239023,0.0030624673,0.004715958,0.0002897912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007652428,0.000006358229,0.00068437506,0.000028106093,0.0000029598216,0.00003574957,0.0050873663,0.00006689417,0.000043987995,0.98821914,0.0012533601,0.004564021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025625848,0.00006136164,0.0135421,0.0007307356,0.000040247356,0.0003441313,0.0307189,0.0017009834,0.0006253607,0.69059944,0.26156452,0.00004659123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043756487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055232216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009355117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006577036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036462988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047719896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985426506","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1082","title":"In Search of a Definition of Property: Conceptualizing property as need-actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property law; Business; Public property; Real property; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06659859312739655,"score_gpt":0.357058792937394,"score_spread":0.2904601998099975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985426506","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029170873,0.0070942193,0.44772077,0.09197791,0.0010837662,0.00009183268,0.00012158546,0.00013756196,0.4226016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90842193,0.0040493687,0.06140126,0.008478327,0.000893669,0.00028090045,0.00012206327,0.00013742436,0.016215008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996496,0.0018892232,0.00015137816,0.00046227765,0.0007185863,0.00028263775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953858,0.0024890834,0.0005129847,0.0007716795,0.00052332965,0.00031712218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006661636,0.0006128772,0.00073332683,0.0028152608,0.003567491,0.0077196257,0.0024325901,0.0037748124,0.0043207128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060878657,0.00028697663,0.00093789125,0.002569344,0.043316193,0.02943676,0.0052743847,0.008046403,0.0006623347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.389569e-7,0.0000020356692,0.000026081601,0.000006819773,7.9852407e-7,0.000007698524,0.00043511062,0.00003853012,0.00001447819,0.9987429,0.00017983251,0.00054480246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004199726,0.000009397009,0.000072876384,0.000046731406,0.000003821196,0.00004060056,0.0008020231,0.00033420767,0.00008555377,0.97481936,0.023776626,0.0000046134296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024435634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002533025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077196257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039857686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003189595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035230517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001115075","doi":"10.7202/1027036ar","title":"Du droit de superficie à la propriété superficiaire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013696557716364657,"score_gpt":0.2390386277269556,"score_spread":0.22534207001059095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001115075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040160064,0.0057603735,0.00641235,0.052231792,0.0011800327,0.00006162663,0.00036304214,0.00010078821,0.8937299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6229443,0.0023881942,0.002541297,0.012545511,0.00041280605,0.00009186924,0.00015745441,0.00009922261,0.3588193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969392,0.0006235339,0.000070846494,0.00058110716,0.0010646314,0.00072080817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835867,0.00040951357,0.000112466725,0.00017338159,0.0007288862,0.0002171681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018252705,0.000549879,0.0003609522,0.0010932029,0.0111243995,0.008226203,0.0014719218,0.005023883,0.019516196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038369151,0.00040998173,0.00053346093,0.0010758395,0.019568644,0.0036925585,0.003179567,0.008429908,0.0017927507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001525888,0.0000071959166,0.0005527023,0.000040761384,0.000004989764,0.00015932783,0.010510656,0.00008199797,0.000382249,0.9594942,0.021509081,0.00724165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014793673,0.000022170983,0.005791723,0.0003331495,0.000017429129,0.00026487827,0.009961309,0.00036338193,0.0008460175,0.05556836,0.9267526,0.00006422562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6965738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77210206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6965738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027409192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025467396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6104263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002725840","doi":"10.1111/jeb.12648","title":"The evolution of respect for property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Simons Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Property (philosophy); Evolutionary biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1228399343557686,"score_gpt":0.4138418531958961,"score_spread":0.2910019188401275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002725840","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049517704,0.9685264,0.0019254714,0.0027522298,0.00023283756,0.0000069331772,0.000026932808,0.000011648096,0.021565666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10640874,0.8877442,0.0009771216,0.0007194023,0.0002710069,0.000014226637,0.000048332502,0.000009473948,0.0038076146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995524,0.00016081687,0.00003008955,0.00009950649,0.000119651726,0.000037391164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.0005570799,0.00014072518,0.00006015278,0.00010950744,0.000041649768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011621824,0.0003761438,0.000476796,0.0014353961,0.00046816896,0.001598677,0.00075065513,0.0018548311,0.0017356004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022569816,0.0001804346,0.00036999185,0.0015174773,0.0039583184,0.0026526155,0.0010846938,0.0014107132,0.000396041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003185623,0.000037373648,0.00097168336,0.0036330756,0.00006071742,0.00023892493,0.0011491672,0.0014637894,0.0010279497,0.4014972,0.006888717,0.5829996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010384097,0.00007797876,0.005825059,0.0043466166,0.00006134285,0.0015622674,0.00069663196,0.0007742747,0.0009974734,0.16183804,0.8237614,0.000048578513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028811633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022832886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028811633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001888299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015533299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013700664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004621154","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n6p169","title":"Infrastructure Provision and Private Lands Acquisition Grievances: Social Benefits and Private Costs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Government (linguistics); Business; Eminent domain; Population; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Welfare; Land use; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.016473301771170876,"score_gpt":0.24647523288658899,"score_spread":0.2300019311154181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004621154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7949079,0.0018195091,0.0015407779,0.009558609,0.00004159174,0.000075092445,0.00018753491,0.000007980224,0.19186088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939714,0.0002897001,0.00013473745,0.000056909597,0.000012788105,0.0000066929997,0.000016387681,0.0000012028484,0.0055101523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829274,0.00068601954,0.000058912123,0.000056222652,0.00041650957,0.00048955687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722433,0.0010475406,0.00067499664,0.00015331106,0.00041093506,0.000488899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009138832,0.00013634464,0.0001567547,0.00104789,0.0018473617,0.002456262,0.0002650286,0.000806033,0.012287231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037757487,0.00011746356,0.00015274691,0.0011338908,0.0029452217,0.0020207518,0.0019575497,0.0006556754,0.00033155223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018461549,0.0005150712,0.17449349,0.00023401392,0.0000599117,0.0016250928,0.008361006,0.0046850163,0.00083478715,0.6454235,0.0064356416,0.15714803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068199624,0.0007827299,0.5454067,0.00095315336,0.000092725924,0.0031389035,0.08892916,0.01067442,0.0012532256,0.18110907,0.1674965,0.000095190386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010663377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041788857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012287231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036631986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004081854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041104853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022362068","doi":"10.7202/1012994ar","title":"What Justice Entails1","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Privilege (computing); Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Nationality; Economic Justice; Citizenship; Lottery; Mechanism (biology); Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Immigration","score_opus":0.044958323511076356,"score_gpt":0.33406043238739763,"score_spread":0.28910210887632126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022362068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012411946,0.003295012,0.016465334,0.10282547,0.0016133754,0.00006707946,0.00021473538,0.000066104396,0.863041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84697455,0.0027420612,0.005938751,0.04381583,0.0025052782,0.00024732528,0.0002172914,0.00017674427,0.09738209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98836714,0.004061466,0.0004624991,0.0023787874,0.0024913612,0.002238772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946878,0.0022414478,0.00040407418,0.0012474756,0.0009701059,0.00044910042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007876531,0.0006398915,0.0008696292,0.0009374718,0.009057173,0.011618102,0.0016028923,0.007140375,0.01252743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013155708,0.00031463406,0.0006750691,0.00070082303,0.040129848,0.0127261225,0.005829547,0.0069722096,0.002558627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044870476,0.0000061777273,0.00011687595,0.00001587809,0.0000048834154,0.000034627432,0.00096654857,0.000033941746,0.000037784423,0.9926138,0.004042385,0.0021226276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004106143,0.0000070655014,0.00015475164,0.00006651623,0.0000060182238,0.000057019053,0.0016683796,0.00006810179,0.00011256789,0.923564,0.07428181,0.00000968139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006461325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073351287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01252743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045697237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069897687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041908443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031761283","doi":"","title":"Property in Licenses and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Property (philosophy); Property law; Political science; Law and economics; Humanities; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02267648806104593,"score_gpt":0.31337960837058626,"score_spread":0.2907031203095403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031761283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029885162,0.0047341743,0.013265783,0.038218867,0.00046559755,0.000025739688,0.00013972814,0.0000614238,0.9132034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228953,0.0025581478,0.001960308,0.0020612224,0.00044387562,0.000035284025,0.00006178771,0.00004520994,0.06993877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971788,0.0012364824,0.00012107519,0.00029475265,0.0007300867,0.0004387155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963154,0.0021444615,0.0002884592,0.00047226233,0.00046585264,0.00031355128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027385147,0.00022066335,0.00034511054,0.0012526846,0.0045501227,0.010545766,0.00093589263,0.0042308383,0.012399669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068695885,0.00029618913,0.0004844167,0.0013872829,0.026025876,0.008226222,0.0036622204,0.0037493887,0.0012152646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012602413,0.0000016262375,0.00003793517,0.0000031943898,6.227834e-7,0.000014911153,0.00028805592,0.000042593812,0.000015730386,0.9982595,0.0007036483,0.00063098664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051020015,0.0000061475366,0.00027303633,0.000042592917,0.0000024054914,0.000041740666,0.0006804645,0.0002803048,0.00005929371,0.9592315,0.03936964,0.00000765777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017809618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015475726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017809618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043185656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041481018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039123807","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0006","title":"The Natural Law Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership: Kant's Theory of Property in His Doctrine of Right","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Duty; Law; Doctrine; Public property; State (computer science); Private property; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012214894139636926,"score_gpt":0.21932444111470115,"score_spread":0.20710954697506423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039123807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013597172,0.012104837,0.048429266,0.06803865,0.0012485227,0.00005417664,0.00018895733,0.00009806942,0.85624033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89035606,0.0040681367,0.010803953,0.010312872,0.0015129057,0.0001712493,0.000088751585,0.000089435736,0.08259666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976629,0.0012214151,0.0000690954,0.00032496062,0.00045339222,0.0002683221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989519,0.0006102563,0.00008280834,0.00015513969,0.00013350532,0.00006637587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026489608,0.00046355376,0.00035419958,0.0010359046,0.003584551,0.0058698165,0.0013673055,0.0059534307,0.004345789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002835853,0.0004266359,0.0005416199,0.0009628191,0.038494386,0.010009331,0.0029463856,0.0067308303,0.0011064686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021745273,0.0000023864027,0.00001295288,0.0000047692038,5.2928925e-7,0.000011047112,0.00033774046,0.000053014104,0.000012888227,0.9970908,0.001837536,0.0006340983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036829542,0.000004367215,0.00007399916,0.000041518913,0.0000018650375,0.000028793176,0.00015762266,0.00026338088,0.000048345337,0.966535,0.0328351,0.0000062623176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045285113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040249834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059534307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047710952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024129488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034616888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057420653","doi":"10.7202/039836ar","title":"The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Morality; Positivism; Analogy; Virtue; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Land tenure; Epistemology; Land law","score_opus":0.02453393702755719,"score_gpt":0.2797557446958232,"score_spread":0.255221807668266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057420653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19811495,0.0043390915,0.038028315,0.18714988,0.0006999877,0.000039931307,0.000056427107,0.000083423765,0.5714881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900843,0.0003239807,0.0011150404,0.0023833737,0.00017584716,0.000019899648,0.000006095297,0.000013872083,0.005877472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618477,0.002212228,0.00008983005,0.00036001066,0.0006832394,0.0004700348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504626,0.0033016608,0.0004296687,0.0005376168,0.0003614693,0.00032341052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005529637,0.00021318067,0.000551642,0.0007714994,0.0042791693,0.00731436,0.0011491544,0.005595855,0.0039032209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012356893,0.00021631707,0.00052519346,0.00078659185,0.047130227,0.0114669055,0.0058931853,0.008050323,0.00030757178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032342705,0.0000039733754,0.000036455014,0.0000031383881,5.532177e-7,0.00002354312,0.00049172615,0.00006093485,0.000016246015,0.9985043,0.00038325775,0.00047271684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009691318,0.000004952363,0.00009685337,0.00001493892,0.0000011970782,0.00002978383,0.00036938902,0.00043532695,0.00003792869,0.99397874,0.0050175423,0.0000036462877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032236485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021041387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00731436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004922354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027434637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035714388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065245719","doi":"10.7202/042289ar","title":"Les droits de superficie et l'imprécision du langage juridique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Accession; Civil code; Beneficiary; Property rights; Confusion; Institution; Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Humanities; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Epistemology; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.013981165661697464,"score_gpt":0.27735332898496384,"score_spread":0.2633721633232664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065245719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068190075,0.019765586,0.029932173,0.12362176,0.0021153307,0.00006130799,0.00088031666,0.00071264117,0.7547208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86674285,0.004621651,0.00615937,0.010839132,0.0019899933,0.0000956684,0.00017084347,0.0002913013,0.1090891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770995,0.005603403,0.0011851096,0.0023219897,0.011555565,0.0022344822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675318,0.019946644,0.001969698,0.0022340515,0.007560279,0.0007575302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015775016,0.00042702,0.00078609656,0.0031381485,0.009163339,0.014574057,0.0024835486,0.004749622,0.013212591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034263726,0.00057836476,0.00073739834,0.0022835776,0.017704394,0.009158651,0.0032832937,0.0085275145,0.002238854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019507463,0.000004466919,0.0006112511,0.00004891471,0.000006928483,0.00009217428,0.006012582,0.00014502171,0.00020791081,0.97229934,0.011324546,0.009227359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003122314,0.00003753536,0.0046790177,0.0005284681,0.000035948717,0.00041563407,0.009528401,0.00065032387,0.001406974,0.13901787,0.8435396,0.00012893291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25990096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23897861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25990096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01807738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012021285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5167763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081003266","doi":"10.2747/0272-3638.28.2.198","title":"Legal Geographies—<i>Kelo</i>, Contradiction, and Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Geography","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Redevelopment; Public use; Private property; Supreme court; Capitalism; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Politics","score_opus":0.007497949538879941,"score_gpt":0.23671727286907698,"score_spread":0.22921932333019704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081003266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076182514,0.008744778,0.0055431253,0.30082276,0.0009924388,0.000021097176,0.00013061718,0.00005160147,0.607511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95184076,0.001582258,0.0008233437,0.026109556,0.00037677988,0.00002898905,0.000038530005,0.000025010271,0.019174702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976866,0.0010721507,0.000067078145,0.00030121085,0.0004391579,0.0004337945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983766,0.0009324174,0.0002726455,0.00015738678,0.00015797612,0.00010299307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019749948,0.00024731635,0.00025417312,0.0012046582,0.008131575,0.008530656,0.0011078328,0.0039107217,0.0033425891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003222593,0.00022251287,0.00027148856,0.0013595459,0.057244625,0.005716771,0.0038615821,0.004004361,0.000329603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012522443,0.0000010467944,0.00007872397,0.000003870405,4.0914708e-7,0.000028390079,0.0022344564,0.000023114255,0.000012870911,0.99402434,0.0030135205,0.00057793985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001747491,0.000008791562,0.0013764948,0.00022980741,0.0000058734972,0.00018418787,0.020215727,0.0002688147,0.00019452689,0.6734407,0.3040341,0.00002350851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03306399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051114008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03306399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010191434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049953754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07394445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083230380","doi":"10.7202/1012997ar","title":"Citizenship as Property, Not So Valuable","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Nothing; Politics; Realm; Political science; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Corporate governance; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.056162576604918066,"score_gpt":0.3198307357513996,"score_spread":0.2636681591464815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083230380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10686297,0.017035114,0.016282791,0.25816637,0.0011017009,0.00002442597,0.00007051098,0.000090686524,0.6003654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97286725,0.0018878,0.0010363951,0.0062193996,0.00040417045,0.00002296368,0.000019365372,0.000027149927,0.017515559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784493,0.0011839952,0.00004795745,0.0002527174,0.00035656698,0.00031375364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818796,0.0008706751,0.00020142343,0.000349754,0.0001591635,0.00023087366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002213957,0.00020052616,0.0003752956,0.00060480763,0.0034473864,0.00983395,0.00065070984,0.0024989815,0.0030449065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036988014,0.00012497543,0.00023339718,0.0009901008,0.042255703,0.010433181,0.0040030433,0.0048460094,0.00041897237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031846894,0.0000032947726,0.0001658831,0.0000072164985,0.000001137872,0.000015624428,0.0017419591,0.0000336186,0.00002346679,0.993704,0.0018103485,0.0024901824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004070928,0.000012129229,0.00048682382,0.00006861749,0.0000026043203,0.00005025652,0.0034881348,0.00014176835,0.000086933425,0.93066764,0.06498437,0.000006725434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018488378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027770717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00983395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016463216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001984771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011945009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113519645","doi":"10.1017/s000819730000012x","title":"The Rule Against Perpetuities and the Law Commission's Flawed Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Rule of law; Perpetuity; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.015856616679670102,"score_gpt":0.2507193452691885,"score_spread":0.2348627285895184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113519645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019457566,0.013405738,0.07321402,0.5732622,0.0077220383,0.00014309476,0.00012978491,0.00024131162,0.3124242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7701332,0.0037626433,0.034267034,0.13230826,0.0056810156,0.00042054197,0.000053869066,0.00024260378,0.053130876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581921,0.015255115,0.0024132251,0.005365946,0.015758995,0.0030145615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649053,0.023134088,0.0017649241,0.0036401718,0.0052134898,0.0013419391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049617033,0.0005577549,0.0017161653,0.0028520175,0.010939211,0.023326727,0.004299314,0.030528186,0.0016911301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06387585,0.0008171619,0.0015029237,0.002155896,0.100869946,0.014565985,0.006858813,0.036825087,0.00062440446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014505632,0.0000021986523,0.000017685556,0.0000032672492,0.0000012823587,0.00000981849,0.0003367748,0.000046965793,0.000005990754,0.99744475,0.0014755691,0.0006542542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022777109,0.000010821464,0.000051130217,0.00006993839,0.000009209755,0.000037591013,0.00023876365,0.00034700785,0.000083153434,0.9448364,0.05426817,0.000024978955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043393157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0250375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049617033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017909369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027652487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26240313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126806701","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v2n1p102","title":"Commodifying Human Life: The Numerus Clausus Principle and Unconventional Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Property law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.1577617189360805,"score_gpt":0.4460581746916094,"score_spread":0.2882964557555289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126806701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03925089,0.025420021,0.039949693,0.038617782,0.0005707731,0.000059950944,0.00007756778,0.000056678142,0.85599655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452241,0.0101124225,0.008026435,0.0071979794,0.0005819261,0.00012540299,0.00003903424,0.000049308437,0.028643342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498594,0.0016197867,0.00016095748,0.0007045813,0.0018537743,0.00067499385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980653,0.001007066,0.00020695443,0.0003531985,0.0002653316,0.00010216595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038140356,0.00034311038,0.00043500253,0.0016923952,0.004576442,0.006864968,0.0012797895,0.003325039,0.0028396985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059303944,0.0002642381,0.00052628067,0.001757612,0.07319019,0.008475108,0.004074828,0.0047890632,0.00031627587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0146847e-7,7.085282e-7,0.000034047047,0.0000069499206,4.4336915e-7,0.000009257273,0.000405799,0.000038618495,0.000012400164,0.9978035,0.0002701502,0.0014171322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003617157,0.000008150674,0.0006603784,0.0002859298,0.000004436502,0.00011617663,0.00096209015,0.00029839028,0.00019424147,0.914232,0.08322085,0.000013731308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06306647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053553477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06306647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014811811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010873535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12539881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129370845","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.467","title":"PROPERTY AND COLLECTIVE UNDERTAKING: THE PRINCIPLE OF <i>NUMERUS CLAUSUS</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Private property; Politics; Property rights; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Converse; Law; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04223924788035284,"score_gpt":0.2432543048598389,"score_spread":0.20101505697948607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129370845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043411348,0.0027111801,0.15397108,0.049476847,0.0005733331,0.00008072792,0.000092362076,0.00015238466,0.7495307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95959526,0.0005222452,0.015327276,0.00306839,0.00044915502,0.00015936226,0.000038500475,0.000074618256,0.020765213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394715,0.0026873755,0.00028637046,0.00113678,0.0012750986,0.00066729326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956839,0.0021045622,0.0004364486,0.0010061248,0.00045191756,0.0003171164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070640594,0.0003195245,0.000606804,0.0014002735,0.0060572205,0.008510655,0.0015233814,0.004887852,0.004545065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074229846,0.00033678822,0.000953217,0.0008508895,0.06787675,0.011085148,0.0067450507,0.0050316285,0.0008858146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015866918,0.0000014346205,0.000031076215,0.0000035092323,5.28545e-7,0.000006245677,0.0002791373,0.000034696932,0.000016090073,0.99893314,0.00023782002,0.00045481927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005897949,0.000006277005,0.00010712943,0.000028548633,0.0000018267648,0.000034811128,0.00022386582,0.00034231727,0.000083728206,0.9815856,0.017574498,0.0000055889673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005110666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004384089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008510655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060795415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043970644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044110358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131571412","doi":"","title":"The Regulative Function of Property Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Property rights; Function (biology); Law and economics; Position (finance); Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Business; Control (management); Focus (optics); Economics; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Computer science; Right to property; Finance","score_opus":0.03633403168206132,"score_gpt":0.24026547571393755,"score_spread":0.20393144403187624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131571412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04896265,0.0017976062,0.33685327,0.023694891,0.0003407581,0.00016541407,0.00013210981,0.00021206129,0.5878412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617667,0.0007104317,0.015708629,0.0013359977,0.0003313135,0.0002489936,0.000046145182,0.000060472907,0.019791342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98798233,0.0053381114,0.00048355095,0.0020498864,0.0028917158,0.0012542816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98380524,0.007907713,0.0017720487,0.00430584,0.0017235922,0.000485535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015981767,0.0005284701,0.0005200724,0.0015113493,0.0034881665,0.007130234,0.0021312716,0.003223022,0.0063573713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017842127,0.00053098635,0.0009854678,0.0010067434,0.037047397,0.0093610585,0.0045310035,0.0036892479,0.0010093435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002433772,0.0000043596215,0.00009171869,0.000007497732,0.0000026403861,0.000012391036,0.00031970532,0.00023645168,0.000098768054,0.9976254,0.00015675566,0.0014418323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017204336,0.000020698491,0.0002760515,0.00006816612,0.000011376394,0.00004158162,0.00021411417,0.0012339748,0.00061376806,0.977661,0.019827941,0.000014019223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004389491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025483537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015981767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004717364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006022648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08452064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06766350222503802,"score_gpt":0.28581791827382536,"score_spread":0.21815441604878733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135936424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08665663,0.009471376,0.12545702,0.09951933,0.00065897545,0.000044203876,0.000099093086,0.00011079234,0.6779826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769099,0.0014943191,0.0054223277,0.0024669801,0.00037320604,0.00004923081,0.000018301156,0.000025007157,0.013240675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638915,0.0019344244,0.00009912245,0.0003634414,0.0007187821,0.0004951224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980952,0.0008302461,0.00026525254,0.00039033734,0.00025324913,0.000165772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037442925,0.0002976396,0.00041319084,0.0012000187,0.0038909507,0.0068393066,0.0013684931,0.0034728022,0.004211454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028874194,0.00023118065,0.00072566065,0.0011142131,0.045696277,0.010456028,0.0053177737,0.0035610807,0.0006028443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013130671,0.0000027073231,0.000022949784,0.0000039358424,9.0664594e-7,0.0000058307714,0.0002675575,0.00006886561,0.000011580523,0.99880993,0.00022890669,0.0005755114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027481688,0.0000045437637,0.000064932006,0.00001975154,0.0000022626157,0.0000136299595,0.00032944203,0.00029983453,0.000056431127,0.99031234,0.00889086,0.0000032945113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002217816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016089634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068393066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038285588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027488216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027778268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156687330","doi":"","title":"Environmental Damages after the Federal Environmental Enforcement Act: Bringing Ecosystem Services to Canadian Environmental Law?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Damages; Ecosystem services; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Valuation (finance); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Law enforcement; Environmental degradation; Environmental resource management; Environmental studies; Business; Political science; Law; Ecosystem; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.0074543322649080765,"score_gpt":0.19861961660297528,"score_spread":0.1911652843380672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156687330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072533645,0.01335119,0.0033488518,0.47185463,0.001551733,0.00009441956,0.00058664667,0.000070430535,0.43660846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935865,0.008726371,0.0027937507,0.047247358,0.00045449878,0.000052213025,0.0002080966,0.000043562795,0.04688747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883823,0.00086561765,0.00021056607,0.0008050466,0.005499914,0.0042365827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928059,0.0013925547,0.0003230583,0.00031354703,0.003950949,0.0012139964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053707594,0.0004712826,0.00050909654,0.0029191095,0.022869213,0.016058784,0.0036318416,0.009640765,0.0060363077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02151454,0.0004341305,0.00062272977,0.003494823,0.017375844,0.007893496,0.004459533,0.00802177,0.00034783193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001535289,0.000024113006,0.0034510272,0.0000541965,0.000013512593,0.00028327582,0.0065432745,0.00041283583,0.00014203323,0.9144131,0.049240988,0.02540632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003890697,0.000036371333,0.039155003,0.0008444375,0.00013538524,0.00032951808,0.025478818,0.0030822828,0.00078256504,0.1938658,0.73595345,0.0002974059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99632335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15979357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15979357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30153912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9745204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193824776","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0015","title":"Property’s Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0480782264763015,"score_gpt":0.3631084027986167,"score_spread":0.3150301763223152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193824776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024538739,0.0026419938,0.038026884,0.02425461,0.00036345175,0.00006288695,0.00014874224,0.00006359725,0.90989906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619753,0.001439164,0.0046998914,0.0032464077,0.0005702403,0.00009904312,0.000108155495,0.00003419788,0.027827624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941766,0.0021059655,0.0003688125,0.0011859909,0.0014539,0.00070864934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99275255,0.0032210841,0.0005309672,0.0016065894,0.0014414099,0.00044730256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066886772,0.00026396263,0.00069980585,0.0013200935,0.003667402,0.008035894,0.0009988268,0.0035448659,0.009137631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009588391,0.00030413622,0.00067403825,0.0009351564,0.032994498,0.0075864084,0.0048828213,0.0058327727,0.0012271018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011739874,0.000001919219,0.000036430327,0.0000049208106,0.0000014488378,0.000011142711,0.00028398188,0.000041056588,0.000034711607,0.9983183,0.00048056472,0.0007842988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089899795,0.000013001469,0.00018349783,0.000060765786,0.0000052883142,0.000067034576,0.00018795545,0.00027718552,0.00012586066,0.94998825,0.049074207,0.000007918383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038474367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019186776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009137631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030519078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034531674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03537357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207448566","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2225297","title":"Moving Backwards: Does the Lack of Duty to Consult Create the Right to Infringe Aboriginal and Treaty Rights?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Duty; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.011654216720585323,"score_gpt":0.2947338072525524,"score_spread":0.2830795905319671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207448566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14237832,0.0010122341,0.006661907,0.22385897,0.00041932234,0.000055676006,0.00007433063,0.000037232738,0.62550193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94926816,0.0003565097,0.0014397696,0.017581431,0.00017931634,0.00004740773,0.00001848588,0.000034109406,0.031074684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992573,0.0025040563,0.0002034878,0.0007853047,0.0014458036,0.0024882606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98248094,0.008754138,0.0019145656,0.0025519985,0.0024122994,0.0018859708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011595597,0.00019691992,0.0006449429,0.000890245,0.010016866,0.008103395,0.002280771,0.015604642,0.019804806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032316025,0.00043888588,0.0006363319,0.0009524,0.035344712,0.0143012125,0.004999921,0.013274268,0.0017710078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024526633,0.00003513325,0.0012201641,0.000022023263,0.000007548177,0.000205591,0.013317903,0.0000578257,0.0002525713,0.9765504,0.0037370846,0.004569229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046718058,0.000037667,0.004627747,0.00029277586,0.000036150388,0.00040236977,0.025768628,0.00055804907,0.00054226286,0.8962964,0.07133778,0.000053375326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057617974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07154445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94238204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057999305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017431995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11456519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220590183","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2738","title":"Book Note: Saving The Neighborhood: Racially Restrictive Covenants, Law, And Social Norms, by Richard RW Brooks and Carol M Rose","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.010147466980334726,"score_gpt":0.25355093099822923,"score_spread":0.2434034640178945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220590183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007846952,0.05312292,0.0008629681,0.81529874,0.025622573,0.0000328396,0.00028539964,0.000060516584,0.10392928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016602147,0.043288708,0.001783004,0.33625293,0.030606044,0.00017850295,0.00022528357,0.00015365583,0.57090974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993994,0.00020843674,0.000028515271,0.00009798915,0.00021905359,0.000046582165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964155,0.0025538183,0.00008907871,0.00009508632,0.00061046804,0.00023605773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012976985,0.0007033391,0.00063744636,0.0008515559,0.005467366,0.0051321434,0.0016302987,0.0096359635,0.018723406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004437071,0.0005718687,0.00041417216,0.0013472659,0.004681933,0.006535756,0.0015067412,0.008486122,0.006503863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021233998,0.000007755653,0.00008227041,0.000015497533,0.0000012366019,0.000012055077,0.00027135553,0.00002540409,0.000017891678,0.016588677,0.9790663,0.003909378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009092269,0.00000811993,0.0008400823,0.00018188683,0.0000058319965,0.00003972196,0.0015912912,0.00009174463,0.00005159873,0.018008672,0.9791571,0.0000149370735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08559061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2813292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08559061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002910264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050200275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17018479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228162110","doi":"","title":"Holding Deposit Agreements: Pre-Tenancy Obligations and Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Leasehold estate; Landlord; Renting; Obligation; Business; Position (finance); Payment; Law; Confusion; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.032529383162635254,"score_gpt":0.29077886562680666,"score_spread":0.2582494824641714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228162110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038303543,0.0033115146,0.02286918,0.025469646,0.00059266057,0.00015238457,0.0002307916,0.00013242256,0.90893793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69442445,0.0022238316,0.0107313255,0.0081694685,0.000640985,0.00030240862,0.00015208105,0.00013009198,0.2832254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99107915,0.0025428971,0.00078657793,0.0011658309,0.0031151797,0.001310402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433714,0.0024516808,0.00047339272,0.00086739234,0.0013112319,0.00055908575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008738558,0.0003349951,0.00036404637,0.00069302565,0.0073864553,0.009942321,0.001860613,0.006961171,0.010377016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009607878,0.0006537286,0.00036460135,0.0011038019,0.016581247,0.009045595,0.0051089865,0.008870148,0.0024868844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006542548,0.000008502078,0.0001416671,0.00000903353,5.784247e-7,0.00006169984,0.0013900667,0.000041445717,0.00013290903,0.9932267,0.0022468003,0.0027341382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036363184,0.00007622462,0.0018474113,0.00033934324,0.0000122583115,0.0004954204,0.0031531423,0.0009733703,0.0014089477,0.5116055,0.47998914,0.00006289986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021709872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024657656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021709872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057675536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011203263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04621446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253276794","doi":"","title":"The Enforcement of Security Interests Against the Personal Property of First Nations Persons on a Reserve","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Debtor; Creditor; Enforcement; Personal property; Security interest; Business; Legislation; Law and economics; Law; International trade; Finance; Economics; Political science; Debt; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.020646841218818848,"score_gpt":0.2805618801163803,"score_spread":0.25991503889756146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253276794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16042456,0.0009817007,0.0064882245,0.008076614,0.000113850496,0.000069056514,0.0000976713,0.000070796894,0.82367754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575335,0.0005186481,0.001072879,0.0008930977,0.00006025418,0.000030381758,0.000032718788,0.0000116735,0.039846897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959246,0.0011851933,0.00025432327,0.00040097954,0.0010508049,0.001184159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940753,0.002826723,0.0013562351,0.000848063,0.0006370079,0.00025670696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002711485,0.00016782692,0.00024775698,0.0009836667,0.0042341137,0.006189185,0.0013329249,0.003429019,0.0073797815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00828029,0.0003547438,0.00041845228,0.0011476049,0.008080098,0.0020017305,0.0031215244,0.0030583357,0.0009893719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013496036,0.000016774768,0.0023259604,0.00002207198,0.0000070053384,0.00057290366,0.002989801,0.00034705675,0.00050578633,0.983021,0.0029877673,0.007190391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008383738,0.00024033217,0.040292636,0.0011301625,0.00017299263,0.0025238218,0.012714207,0.008584751,0.008757827,0.41332978,0.51195234,0.00021731362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040531736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053086113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95946825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040502544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062850486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08059162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225544482","doi":"","title":"The (Virtue) Ethics of Private Property: A Framework & Implications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Institution; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Sketch; Constructive; Private rights; Morality; Politics; Public property; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030909351966628536,"score_gpt":0.3261057091789169,"score_spread":0.2951963572122884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225544482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031083213,0.028772019,0.098835684,0.20421512,0.0010700114,0.000115690025,0.0001319192,0.00009391729,0.6356824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518846,0.0073391967,0.017961824,0.005795623,0.0008956452,0.00023867555,0.000036472742,0.000054883498,0.015793076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364156,0.004296383,0.00013240942,0.00049337745,0.00095960975,0.00047671003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387544,0.0041654846,0.0003921894,0.0005526078,0.0005979139,0.00041632884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007965694,0.00058779225,0.00077408575,0.0028999106,0.007689496,0.011536369,0.0018597319,0.007378422,0.006007302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054614395,0.000403375,0.00066096254,0.0024678549,0.07965499,0.011724704,0.00570906,0.0068692835,0.00074144907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0501453e-7,0.0000029737773,0.00001919787,0.0000066842645,3.4239213e-7,0.000019093832,0.00034043012,0.00004829595,0.000008564352,0.99880004,0.00027638013,0.0004771649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004312025,0.0000042131414,0.0000936163,0.00008050911,0.0000011305847,0.0000476501,0.0008785765,0.00032783955,0.00003019066,0.9804751,0.018051844,0.000004888299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052070185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044151093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011536369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008201005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056968383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05950272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262223792","doi":"","title":"The Trail Smelter, is What's Past Prologue? Epa Blazes a New Trail for Cercla","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Smelting; Prologue; Environmental protection; Recreation; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022328123499462997,"score_gpt":0.29088533248525666,"score_spread":0.26855720898579366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262223792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049364776,0.00954411,0.0013883201,0.6518532,0.020355836,0.000030193178,0.00031456855,0.000345263,0.311232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055810325,0.0077911164,0.0017638443,0.1863452,0.0022927169,0.000025652891,0.00024640275,0.00032926042,0.7453955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814856,0.00026722383,0.000070332935,0.00026884084,0.00076878344,0.00047626396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976342,0.00026063598,0.00008109903,0.00015039263,0.0010007835,0.00087296416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017692215,0.00032432514,0.00026582548,0.0005893318,0.012129902,0.0135422805,0.0008253063,0.004714535,0.034222156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060681733,0.0003631174,0.0003668327,0.0007798976,0.005493983,0.008837393,0.0025966035,0.01002493,0.009356757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022687047,0.00003253658,0.00078844855,0.000048211077,0.000003354641,0.00015885496,0.00086999324,0.00003289846,0.0001544935,0.034223918,0.93262684,0.031037783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017801877,0.00000978379,0.0002058418,0.0000657647,0.0000018037022,0.000059513946,0.0021439749,0.000014550219,0.00007771356,0.0019537269,0.99545825,0.0000072505454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07537094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20014194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07537094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004381548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017071502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14986444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263093417","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Takings: Taking Analysis in Land Use Regulation in the United States, Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Just compensation; Private property; Property law; Eminent domain; Public use; Property rights; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Law; Public property; Government (linguistics); Nonpossessory interest in land; Law and economics; Land law; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0354172027079544,"score_gpt":0.2889424336074119,"score_spread":0.2535252308994575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263093417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21487612,0.013062762,0.006562021,0.06417595,0.00024754985,0.00022148278,0.00022981419,0.000044577526,0.70057976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457539,0.008687775,0.0039654635,0.009407693,0.000059701266,0.00008971174,0.00008910286,0.000041079842,0.03190557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518174,0.0006124611,0.000104200284,0.00035400753,0.0024018404,0.00134567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969008,0.00075269636,0.00018755526,0.000100787285,0.0015426757,0.0005155985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020870394,0.00038829554,0.0004457981,0.004145828,0.019787656,0.00924333,0.0019789925,0.0026377386,0.0024526708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041605425,0.00032544794,0.0007761817,0.0055100084,0.025038892,0.0035843228,0.0031470696,0.0067311972,0.00009233568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000885046,0.00002393166,0.0038911363,0.00004200097,0.000010884892,0.00022184002,0.01817666,0.0007691896,0.000166793,0.95951414,0.005328506,0.011846224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003123892,0.00007571894,0.084035784,0.0013666564,0.0001820447,0.00031694377,0.13363652,0.0067715077,0.0015784246,0.3800338,0.3916349,0.00033653685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10501878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10501878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12941997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76196814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264714780","doi":"","title":"Of Course a Land Use Regulation that Fails to Substantially Advance Legitimate State Interests Results in a Regulatory Taking","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham environmental law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Balancing test; Law; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Economics; History","score_opus":0.03886879061215617,"score_gpt":0.30399195804486606,"score_spread":0.2651231674327099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264714780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22258148,0.0010497432,0.070428014,0.053686358,0.00091614726,0.00028790787,0.0003862443,0.00024118465,0.6504229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409766,0.0003139425,0.009260206,0.013753367,0.00032239896,0.000226437,0.00009486261,0.000046087956,0.035006057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98503625,0.0022073907,0.0007291471,0.0027900585,0.00735228,0.0018850281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98891395,0.006150186,0.001331156,0.0017522798,0.0014589443,0.0003934134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009832103,0.00039195715,0.00065218157,0.0009028177,0.0034031705,0.0063416525,0.001972224,0.0063799056,0.005418837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014554039,0.00048871496,0.0013109103,0.0005629073,0.020933824,0.0046510375,0.005069605,0.00719451,0.0011696167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012038132,0.00003180585,0.0010502643,0.000016562946,0.000012015101,0.00013516472,0.0004610027,0.00023955952,0.00095128076,0.9910693,0.0021354302,0.0038856121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062551786,0.0002814945,0.0037761931,0.00014234176,0.00008016359,0.0006163816,0.0013719966,0.0021719425,0.0068351715,0.90365154,0.08090251,0.000107778535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037750043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004576911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009832103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026269385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005065018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05199772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268489386","doi":"10.1215/9780822376149-012","title":"Dispossession and Canadian Land Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.022225468123340877,"score_gpt":0.2573010534360088,"score_spread":0.23507558531266792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268489386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0105817,0.00921212,0.0010678702,0.010372812,0.0003021336,0.000025615604,0.00015673047,0.000019988414,0.96826106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41718543,0.009971031,0.0013711995,0.0037236647,0.0002911214,0.000057342204,0.0001660138,0.00004812997,0.56718606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975325,0.00021942938,0.000040398612,0.00021145589,0.0012080874,0.0007881717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990103,0.0003148621,0.000036203837,0.00007199979,0.00047600555,0.000090558766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016249082,0.00060385984,0.0004903507,0.0029901124,0.014685262,0.009301836,0.0018618158,0.0047039585,0.020223243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036862062,0.00038392298,0.0005690175,0.0046357913,0.013846227,0.0028839263,0.0020518983,0.0049684364,0.0008509442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034564916,0.0000047092053,0.00010850248,0.000010655662,0.0000016795626,0.00003253178,0.00079218415,0.00013685541,0.000020769947,0.97847223,0.0147731,0.005643346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011282705,0.0000065132294,0.002493345,0.00025393933,0.00001556921,0.00009033514,0.0026387274,0.0008253266,0.00017731736,0.4170519,0.5763899,0.00004586571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093819894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093819894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074233815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68071413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294284428","doi":"","title":"Finger in the Dike: Oliver a Houck & the Environmental Movement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Scholarship; Courage; Passion; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental law; Management; Political science; History; Archaeology; Psychology","score_opus":0.009891462051680688,"score_gpt":0.2560042330479506,"score_spread":0.24611277099626994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294284428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013514424,0.05325752,0.0005688358,0.7005892,0.0029743246,0.000012349726,0.000050512524,0.000052061718,0.22898085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31434557,0.039075363,0.0010874633,0.15837958,0.0030688676,0.0000578077,0.000047690468,0.00012202578,0.48381567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926,0.00029515833,0.000012521428,0.00007539975,0.00016135705,0.00019553737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899834,0.00045148085,0.00008770291,0.00002885388,0.00017333441,0.00026037134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078920426,0.00022479711,0.00019770593,0.0008281635,0.012581086,0.004658257,0.0005739817,0.0031394497,0.0102586625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003174641,0.00025310085,0.000110284585,0.00071110873,0.006255907,0.004400303,0.0018706999,0.0038620755,0.0014690476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014797071,0.000033842487,0.00096952356,0.000035173034,0.0000017499568,0.000420082,0.00934996,0.000043124834,0.000079762765,0.13746579,0.8289415,0.022644673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058752157,0.000010859783,0.0021040158,0.00021531565,0.0000033237134,0.00029264917,0.029807106,0.000069602145,0.00012632152,0.018410506,0.94893754,0.000016780228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06297764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15922499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06297764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042636245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004133758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12522215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309424387","doi":"10.11575/prism/33941","title":"The Law of Expropriation of Land: A Balancing Act,","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Law; Land law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Land tenure; Economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009932058654296683,"score_gpt":0.20434730641557103,"score_spread":0.19441524776127433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309424387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013416151,0.0029881329,0.013474256,0.032246653,0.0006754645,0.00010082832,0.00027054432,0.000088917055,0.9367391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6573062,0.0022496616,0.012238456,0.02889134,0.00092749175,0.0004450451,0.00019080807,0.00012411062,0.29762685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941293,0.0011296346,0.0003407954,0.00088084576,0.0025963846,0.00092293404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981185,0.00074692786,0.00014050618,0.00034680346,0.0005297699,0.00011758476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044421693,0.00047009255,0.00043608368,0.0008227093,0.005989765,0.008333993,0.0019835841,0.009610936,0.006100837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006922689,0.00054809905,0.00058047584,0.0012050644,0.027357375,0.004438634,0.0038022557,0.006986939,0.0014618163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028615245,0.0000029688845,0.0000465289,0.000005904957,0.0000013672826,0.00003148537,0.00034091354,0.00006339153,0.00009143732,0.9933128,0.004965628,0.0011347557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031014497,0.000024805917,0.00076899625,0.00016949394,0.000020641894,0.00021150142,0.0007498663,0.0008641883,0.0007758167,0.6007424,0.39559653,0.000044789558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15228073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20137767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15228073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009897704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018224316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30278873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318756810","doi":"10.1215/08879982-2011-1007","title":"Shasta and Goliath","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tikkun","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Corporation; Law; State (computer science); Personhood; Political science; Power (physics); Multinational corporation; Politics; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.11932542431530747,"score_gpt":0.28424971596120746,"score_spread":0.1649242916459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318756810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015935874,0.0045192046,0.00033682893,0.018142655,0.004089751,0.00008763217,0.001102682,0.00025891513,0.95552635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03284269,0.001849287,0.00045502433,0.0035317307,0.00036984045,0.00003447149,0.00078162504,0.000065512664,0.9600699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999713,0.000022395152,0.0000059710014,0.000058332305,0.0000932425,0.000107067324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977046,0.000010537671,0.00001063741,0.000012493797,0.00008521155,0.000110738176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025783255,0.0006192963,0.00023303095,0.0006579085,0.0044483123,0.002358147,0.00047693803,0.0011517435,0.19134936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004968624,0.00016882332,0.00021583868,0.00048040965,0.0009312242,0.00079735316,0.002072825,0.0015242042,0.04257686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010056813,0.000094008115,0.004976158,0.00011086216,0.000008775268,0.0006615934,0.000851069,0.00009975487,0.0006430731,0.023873784,0.8494847,0.119095705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059879108,0.000018403265,0.0028172722,0.00004067828,0.0000013046701,0.000102577455,0.00050013856,0.000023722565,0.000050385697,0.00043669858,0.99600005,0.0000028660006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04959211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21619712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19134936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027104935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004438265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64012736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322773336","doi":"10.1093/jhuman/hus015","title":"The Justiciability of Housing Rights: From Argument to Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Justiciability; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Rhetoric; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03724283223681019,"score_gpt":0.37549737422603024,"score_spread":0.33825454198922006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322773336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08432243,0.04240712,0.065635264,0.41756532,0.0036809717,0.0001780623,0.00004305068,0.000063496336,0.38610432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97040087,0.0077010803,0.0052488013,0.01035138,0.0007142111,0.00012281575,0.000012194759,0.000022891007,0.005425647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98115957,0.015123548,0.00041158666,0.00077298126,0.0011451716,0.0013871994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96183497,0.033513807,0.0017959913,0.0009795756,0.0013484369,0.0005272212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024122164,0.0008269193,0.0007405515,0.003488972,0.00934148,0.014085244,0.0021445171,0.008616147,0.0038858328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025590181,0.00042053513,0.0004277562,0.003067789,0.1106536,0.020183042,0.007530893,0.008566859,0.00028992165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035519201,0.000005818977,0.000045960027,0.00004872755,0.0000010271399,0.00012538384,0.009978371,0.00009681901,0.000028257664,0.98730785,0.0007758832,0.0015824146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001945403,0.000036136335,0.00025377356,0.001283291,0.0000072078283,0.00015312525,0.04127659,0.00058491365,0.00036647843,0.86884886,0.08714461,0.000025554946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007978576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004800987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024122164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0180433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071892766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13091391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328588749","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00201003","title":"Restorative Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Doctrine; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Alienation; Economic Justice; Public administration","score_opus":0.06563879200546957,"score_gpt":0.3746379273291859,"score_spread":0.3089991353237163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328588749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059410413,0.0018642801,0.01304602,0.095138736,0.002606165,0.00016873273,0.000097780634,0.00013018402,0.88100713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5251944,0.0018492879,0.0070497366,0.10889415,0.0025990887,0.0005370972,0.00017211953,0.00030532244,0.35339877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98838556,0.0031253486,0.00040011975,0.0022870752,0.0029254814,0.0028764587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264294,0.0021814944,0.0005373197,0.0018429289,0.0017565798,0.0010388298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010171746,0.0007148757,0.0008121878,0.0012616466,0.017752348,0.008760394,0.0032438105,0.010997357,0.030139334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023627736,0.00031442026,0.0010163205,0.0007626471,0.025094448,0.0071803103,0.012341103,0.012761176,0.0047194664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070723263,0.000026440022,0.00019477986,0.00003186114,0.000006843669,0.00015251967,0.0033719726,0.000103523686,0.00009347663,0.9437688,0.04324429,0.008998413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109094035,0.000021412829,0.00027832578,0.00019445842,0.00000902734,0.00025351084,0.003824052,0.00018038401,0.0001824621,0.40377122,0.5912577,0.000016476792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006782527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013555498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030139334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062756506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014987741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100826085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329572589","doi":"10.2307/4127184","title":"Restitution of Land to New Zealand Maori: The Role of Social Structure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.015474339492043557,"score_gpt":0.24312503019939233,"score_spread":0.22765069070734878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329572589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68938184,0.0018504466,0.001359581,0.010295888,0.00004155282,0.000060133185,0.000035222663,0.000018519719,0.29695684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946845,0.0004500207,0.00020616609,0.000114753086,0.000014045562,0.000013316942,0.00000614381,0.0000033259576,0.004507716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987722,0.0004042971,0.00003213603,0.000118941025,0.00025563734,0.00041673504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981937,0.000494222,0.00054552575,0.00016950058,0.00020085028,0.00039630887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016503,0.00018393954,0.00023918005,0.0014053007,0.007190434,0.005715408,0.0010287699,0.0010197185,0.0048532174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047966256,0.00018747145,0.00017916168,0.0010800636,0.032283764,0.0026460537,0.0052772774,0.0011548228,0.00024348227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007609972,0.00009216748,0.045236666,0.00017178933,0.000033012973,0.0016026743,0.24306299,0.0004076902,0.0017903327,0.6182807,0.003099177,0.08614668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007789102,0.00037195624,0.32184273,0.0008848581,0.00007057735,0.0011039755,0.28874925,0.0018567536,0.0008347968,0.19743738,0.18667796,0.000091899004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12273014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2601838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12273014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010419164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069572334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24403155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23452499","doi":"10.1023/a:1012660302764","title":"Property rights and property wrongs: Why context matters in fisheries management","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Sciences","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Fisheries management; Fishery; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography; Fishing","score_opus":0.052475750941143255,"score_gpt":0.30424191968408515,"score_spread":0.2517661687429419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23452499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2970654,0.035681345,0.067203,0.39579377,0.0011917612,0.00008970472,0.00031310468,0.0000773846,0.20258452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99087405,0.002148444,0.002151176,0.0030859655,0.00035435485,0.000028872451,0.000016970196,0.000019339639,0.0013208508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938263,0.0037880763,0.0001960308,0.0007037185,0.0008731873,0.000612572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9533696,0.037077207,0.003802356,0.0018404151,0.002477884,0.0014324354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101567395,0.0003971014,0.0011910796,0.0019562365,0.004435485,0.010508579,0.0016136696,0.008219099,0.0088976575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03929029,0.0005685255,0.00059018057,0.002408316,0.03763454,0.026339488,0.0062457114,0.0070674648,0.0004311397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003095077,0.00004000796,0.0024412568,0.00010266495,0.00002248397,0.00013046293,0.0025488103,0.00062537636,0.000081904895,0.98263675,0.0016135899,0.009725602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010256499,0.0000044721182,0.0010398036,0.00006458334,0.000009822062,0.000025559984,0.0014148754,0.00034146672,0.000038358263,0.99436027,0.002682355,0.000008097488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007096778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011194381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010508579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00408492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004562719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053714573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417581176","doi":"","title":"The Morality of James Harris’s Theory of Property","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Institution; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Private property; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013725030251273541,"score_gpt":0.2601528120084714,"score_spread":0.24642778175719787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417581176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027534626,0.014631551,0.053165033,0.26238006,0.002293315,0.0000693662,0.00013287945,0.00013063308,0.63966256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207433,0.0043119555,0.010310343,0.031871438,0.0022121668,0.00012769025,0.000050029783,0.00011227787,0.13026075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968861,0.0014596779,0.00008182067,0.00048650827,0.00074574177,0.00034012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969081,0.002004373,0.00021270025,0.0003127517,0.00033027085,0.00023176041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036235426,0.00033713804,0.00037428844,0.0010341199,0.004843304,0.009420951,0.001507033,0.004639782,0.0035901722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006684677,0.00042625377,0.00043877316,0.0011141973,0.03308272,0.0104391,0.0028939904,0.0050508124,0.0006342736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021160115,0.0000029641153,0.000024154815,0.0000044547673,6.060347e-7,0.000011457773,0.00047219914,0.000060474496,0.000009827111,0.9953204,0.0033765417,0.0007146915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006991845,0.0000064311293,0.000073225536,0.00002742333,0.0000018684908,0.000025141026,0.00042190598,0.00035478763,0.000048229285,0.9132912,0.08573543,0.000007343851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007610488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005596213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009420951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005902585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031240464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042826474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487141959","doi":"10.1002/9781119205524.ch25","title":"Escheat, Abandoned Property, Unclaimed Checks: U.S., Canada, and Where Local Regulations Require","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Property (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Settlement (finance); Business; Law; Control (management); Operations research; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; Payment; Finance; Advertising; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.0178409165578839,"score_gpt":0.2512329108557971,"score_spread":0.23339199429791319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487141959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031190142,0.0010243515,0.002014981,0.0036955676,0.00032921086,0.0003819042,0.017382924,0.0020039598,0.97004807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019385302,0.0015882566,0.0036337897,0.0021467817,0.000040854447,0.00019640004,0.0054274774,0.000910731,0.9666704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997408,0.00011280338,0.00010209234,0.00014155474,0.0017668183,0.0004686498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685585,0.00025202596,0.00012703468,0.00020117113,0.0023592142,0.00020470581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010725264,0.00072395283,0.00036384127,0.0023176377,0.0074283197,0.005773772,0.0020136943,0.002731024,0.13490112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032914446,0.0008455568,0.0004856754,0.0048611644,0.0027314876,0.0020534738,0.0014823314,0.0026219795,0.05718314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022891329,0.00004083573,0.0012745508,0.00013917175,0.0000034762872,0.00013896977,0.0019440204,0.0002731152,0.00052933657,0.039567016,0.9099879,0.046078637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072473704,0.0000059003023,0.004369251,0.00016787804,0.0000051926477,0.000038656235,0.0013191466,0.00009805921,0.0005401433,0.0012567532,0.9921531,0.000038652735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13490112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03209798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09029012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45128924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499888674","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316403594.004","title":"Oil on troubled waters: the consequences of civil liability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Doctrine; Forensic engineering; Law and economics; Legal liability; Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.03972099687914223,"score_gpt":0.23159920577891752,"score_spread":0.19187820889977528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499888674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011921181,0.028663032,0.007353601,0.0689504,0.0009672825,0.000025983914,0.000050543254,0.00004558762,0.8820225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7042382,0.030253429,0.0028370689,0.018438453,0.0015404942,0.000077904406,0.00007027177,0.00016094791,0.24238318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978529,0.0007162162,0.0000614458,0.00016704338,0.0008893561,0.0003128938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983236,0.0009318772,0.00013540318,0.00018303093,0.00028516992,0.00014085478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017431172,0.00042921506,0.00034433545,0.0011013057,0.004851875,0.0075616096,0.0010680808,0.0050389837,0.00857678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006298599,0.00027138714,0.00039203058,0.0010300498,0.02331729,0.009022061,0.005508767,0.007990908,0.0016213908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040384493,0.0000054706175,0.00010298345,0.000022752998,0.000002700451,0.00022633026,0.0024653103,0.00031872027,0.000043759705,0.9667236,0.019792449,0.010291896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046582663,0.000008089115,0.00022265848,0.0002457027,0.0000039121633,0.00019819282,0.0023813983,0.00032691495,0.00010023722,0.8336893,0.16280873,0.000010300936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009668148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125943385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009668148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049329153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049409526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03579092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251000183","doi":"","title":"Dismissing Bankruptcy-Debtor Plaintiffs' Cases on Judicial Estoppel Grounds","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Debtor; Plaintiff; Bankruptcy; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Creditor; Economics; Doctrine; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.19837668139470596,"score_gpt":0.38107136113705853,"score_spread":0.18269467974235257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251000183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3406805,0.002754285,0.007885333,0.05702261,0.0029466208,0.00044636166,0.0003430085,0.00020482812,0.5877165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734854,0.0011833948,0.002559255,0.029546449,0.0015893398,0.00015690514,0.0001215136,0.000051612256,0.09130611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988015,0.002178119,0.0010094236,0.0013432036,0.0038369405,0.0036173821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97757465,0.016372336,0.0010468762,0.0013687359,0.0026045954,0.0010328458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014771036,0.00079134415,0.001762644,0.0035635992,0.011175375,0.01176681,0.004725105,0.030145084,0.009631819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043790914,0.000849467,0.0012851261,0.0018044027,0.005294866,0.0039739776,0.0049976422,0.013799491,0.0024550147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005025866,0.00037222903,0.008808573,0.00026011435,0.00014193366,0.010714651,0.008458536,0.0006984881,0.0048309527,0.8591081,0.08423588,0.021867942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010635438,0.00078831374,0.039403044,0.0017665274,0.001475874,0.0048497473,0.016950844,0.01072054,0.026245397,0.32878566,0.56743014,0.0005203382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012947526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055627055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030145084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033359097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060307547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07811761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513169322","doi":"10.1086/423720","title":"Book ReviewsSerena Olsaretti, , ed. <i>Desert and Justice</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $65.00.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Ninth; Economic Justice; Download; Reprint; Library science; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07888899985329968,"score_gpt":0.3151188666197435,"score_spread":0.2362298667664438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513169322","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020075959,0.91213703,0.0004097492,0.01076321,0.007585799,0.000021330847,0.00040807313,0.000067314315,0.068406664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019663465,0.83763343,0.0006619141,0.0043407343,0.005607733,0.000038192342,0.0007006933,0.000086717984,0.14896436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959654,0.00007233173,0.000028497243,0.000053912147,0.00021523169,0.000033508382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989661,0.0004514837,0.00008134503,0.00003058452,0.000380141,0.00009036049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044589947,0.0014605598,0.0014274789,0.0035178699,0.0010182079,0.00220492,0.0011379729,0.001444134,0.06210172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018278795,0.00051103137,0.0005559604,0.004469248,0.00076681253,0.0027807679,0.000784275,0.0018019396,0.030408675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008078223,0.000011581146,0.000040676354,0.00075523206,0.000006631936,0.00003623783,0.000104967796,0.000055532968,0.00005629216,0.002601907,0.9503042,0.04601863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027818708,0.0000061865294,0.00027251084,0.0007446324,0.0000060239427,0.00018765617,0.000084876105,0.000018344492,0.000026765687,0.0019553197,0.9966898,0.0000051052916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009370442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026478678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06210172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017288078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020772151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20775098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544670875","doi":"","title":"Realizing Rights Here and Now","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Utopia; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Constitution; Rights of Nature; Enforcement; International human rights law; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Supreme court; Right to property; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.012713618642905078,"score_gpt":0.2693101384833658,"score_spread":0.2565965198404607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544670875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024776412,0.0055262484,0.030068683,0.086925104,0.0014593679,0.000046738085,0.00009509397,0.00013428878,0.850968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8617053,0.003672232,0.009038201,0.013922683,0.0011008324,0.00012166485,0.00012678959,0.00014118847,0.110171266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939414,0.001969291,0.00020767101,0.0011655389,0.0014358457,0.0012802327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973157,0.0009629427,0.00020204106,0.0008069789,0.00031990826,0.00039244263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006237105,0.0005140929,0.00059959845,0.0010713551,0.0067295074,0.010051633,0.0010253233,0.004522559,0.019373443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071186516,0.00030535506,0.00067108823,0.0005559238,0.03295738,0.025573043,0.008818663,0.008490155,0.0022427079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022492368,0.000003468523,0.000041029012,0.000005809525,9.175625e-7,0.000019980578,0.0015956226,0.00002128573,0.000072718474,0.99432796,0.0010785593,0.0028304227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000603778,0.000017565071,0.00022229832,0.000104571765,0.000004421655,0.000105468745,0.0031188477,0.00007810321,0.00022783552,0.73827493,0.25782248,0.000017425404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045851762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043022386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019373443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041090804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005032273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06481063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610124562","doi":"10.29173/alr500","title":"Seismic Access Issues","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Scope (computer science); Easement; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08224893160894362,"score_gpt":0.36580324232032135,"score_spread":0.2835543107113777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610124562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01227786,0.012536592,0.007927348,0.043376025,0.001140692,0.000053823205,0.0003141527,0.00012324087,0.9222502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5830389,0.021519518,0.0030131168,0.03707098,0.0060369386,0.00015856029,0.00054640294,0.00013198536,0.3484836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940779,0.0010163342,0.00029055128,0.00048421914,0.0034355065,0.0006954757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98995066,0.0059663802,0.0006823002,0.000673445,0.0021742522,0.00055296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044082124,0.00024610094,0.00039890097,0.0023745582,0.0032725234,0.0042534904,0.0017759046,0.0060566496,0.053213485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01964,0.00029176034,0.00049009133,0.0019965617,0.00346227,0.0040925783,0.0036017871,0.003107497,0.004728598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030042818,0.000026429287,0.0010394364,0.00017546021,0.000013260386,0.00070393825,0.0010796041,0.00029029622,0.00040379542,0.8886679,0.055015985,0.05255391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014873416,0.000027008027,0.0015410667,0.0003115223,0.00002008307,0.001170486,0.0009685335,0.00019182899,0.00028679753,0.1121259,0.88332665,0.000015176754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022005305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02490311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003068903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004331387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17801684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610940184","doi":"","title":"Contracts for the Sale of Land: Understanding the Impecuniosity Defence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.11992804248137287,"score_gpt":0.34354387061554137,"score_spread":0.2236158281341685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610940184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0634649,0.013733354,0.1184725,0.055886235,0.00062425085,0.00026885024,0.00014531198,0.00003928105,0.74736536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411123,0.0072750147,0.016139995,0.0027977608,0.00085264404,0.00043467886,0.00006166069,0.000060991155,0.03126492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232304,0.003670373,0.0002873351,0.00052170677,0.0018648511,0.0013326148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286616,0.0040209293,0.001034226,0.0007295144,0.00074593426,0.0006032555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066461638,0.0007174405,0.00084962446,0.0021556837,0.0048682583,0.012340957,0.0038888594,0.016043067,0.0065402375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011039358,0.00086709403,0.0013272902,0.0026269436,0.040950533,0.023346582,0.0057973354,0.008885957,0.000758236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018075973,0.00000283628,0.00003745674,0.000006843709,7.426208e-7,0.000034498767,0.0003613847,0.00027062686,0.00001622524,0.99877316,0.00013361133,0.00036071174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012647283,0.00002047644,0.0002929694,0.0001312211,0.000004772195,0.00013558123,0.0011393944,0.0031683003,0.00003961044,0.9729901,0.022048451,0.000016369675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018868027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008247803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018868027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012913201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007506427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09369224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612103955","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Private Environmental Governance Through Community Contracts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Corporate governance; Publicity; Obligation; Accountability; Compliance (psychology); Environmental governance; Context (archaeology); Environmental compliance; Harm; Good governance; Accounting; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025123600737146926,"score_gpt":0.29366033925029317,"score_spread":0.26853673851314624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612103955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13143064,0.00061252434,0.30559105,0.030220019,0.0002573366,0.000798286,0.00008696685,0.00027395927,0.5307293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95425355,0.00026485507,0.025924712,0.0015860351,0.00011943227,0.0003101615,0.00003123615,0.000037567985,0.01747247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784993,0.011527492,0.0008485152,0.0020604993,0.0049825725,0.0020817113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736535,0.011327185,0.0030134427,0.007018649,0.0031658467,0.0018213039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020043142,0.00038068372,0.0005425148,0.0011825068,0.004426774,0.0062324814,0.0018937864,0.0057370234,0.0053523793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03218756,0.00053138455,0.0006779623,0.001393712,0.014847913,0.009314152,0.009789098,0.005128758,0.00057387585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008132984,0.000060119088,0.00056774536,0.00001894891,0.00001001171,0.000070664864,0.0010288386,0.0015426856,0.0002784612,0.98807436,0.0007960844,0.0075439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005432716,0.000055463002,0.00063845556,0.00010969543,0.000015523987,0.000078005,0.00085784483,0.0075418246,0.0004573641,0.952342,0.037819088,0.000030375108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005946648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066076233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020043142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004011093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013914386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10599959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618433515","doi":"","title":"The Decline of the Fish/Mammal Distinction?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Law; Sign (mathematics); Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.034261501589087084,"score_gpt":0.32402333145825246,"score_spread":0.2897618298691654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618433515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012716517,0.02347009,0.0009926191,0.6554096,0.00137568,0.000011730275,0.00008694812,0.000016813936,0.30592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.687537,0.010999174,0.0006328286,0.20882402,0.0043399995,0.00007848826,0.00015110824,0.000073134055,0.08736426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966905,0.0010810394,0.00007552585,0.00058479665,0.00089855434,0.0006695276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974119,0.0009355722,0.00021815454,0.00017769953,0.00079988706,0.00045687074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039325953,0.00021661427,0.00043644587,0.0011096642,0.0072572757,0.008858237,0.0015054654,0.0055715945,0.010123098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008658361,0.00021034147,0.00024481612,0.0009349808,0.022015195,0.015656615,0.0036765642,0.008105434,0.0012658505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010123939,0.000012537633,0.0006002616,0.000023173927,0.000001577806,0.00004773173,0.0030286652,0.000019055773,0.000037413505,0.935184,0.051790062,0.009245452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010934072,0.000021938633,0.0030059498,0.00030669678,0.000003638483,0.00011149967,0.007916716,0.00013452506,0.00011104549,0.3717693,0.61659306,0.000014777555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05366511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04319488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05366511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010436386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006894589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10670549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04499553625122221,"score_gpt":0.3274981946011386,"score_spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737459881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026706247,0.026076844,0.16601329,0.43625128,0.0057871332,0.00009874352,0.0004068269,0.00031367413,0.338346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202047,0.007981989,0.025849964,0.026858844,0.002585935,0.0001593441,0.0002425718,0.00025451556,0.015862133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868067,0.0087270895,0.00067774695,0.0013714994,0.0018513778,0.00056567806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95660305,0.03315588,0.0016689704,0.0039697965,0.0033959437,0.0012063538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015933815,0.00063882663,0.0015616844,0.0032927182,0.004865879,0.011796728,0.002822323,0.008561665,0.015346928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061424233,0.00066966633,0.00076249224,0.0022409023,0.06045348,0.04390896,0.00877394,0.014058531,0.002133391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012879867,0.000007358055,0.00014578464,0.000044221437,0.000008769546,0.00006555624,0.001734076,0.00019429046,0.000024954063,0.9880977,0.0047568697,0.0049075154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048934085,0.0000034263232,0.000051008097,0.000072677794,0.0000040014247,0.000040535437,0.0005312013,0.0003000326,0.000044561897,0.9831245,0.015816296,0.0000069332013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005639264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029221477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015933815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055184546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031226748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08426708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752532644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1264","title":"Community, Property, and Human Rights: The Failure of Property-as-Respect","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Private property; Law and economics; Property law; Numerus clausus; Human rights; Political science; Law; Land law; Sociology; Business; Land tenure; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.043043714012098916,"score_gpt":0.3476722668467948,"score_spread":0.3046285528346959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752532644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054151896,0.015457545,0.06464087,0.31202844,0.0009033388,0.000069179565,0.00008507228,0.000098231954,0.5525654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97156185,0.0029402303,0.0048157754,0.008855991,0.0005901351,0.00009208901,0.000021617732,0.000053525222,0.011068765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920378,0.004308399,0.00018205933,0.0010974364,0.0015028851,0.00087153364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989007,0.0071712183,0.000882978,0.0014794377,0.0007352945,0.0007241248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012420638,0.00035987623,0.0008228751,0.0016026343,0.0071439934,0.009575802,0.0019641137,0.0073955124,0.0059769885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015246088,0.00029649938,0.0006659177,0.0014786271,0.08561238,0.020237697,0.008980509,0.007836898,0.00063557824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017148332,0.0000023964665,0.000026279593,0.0000057840693,9.4012074e-7,0.000006248454,0.00039138354,0.00003322987,0.0000071331688,0.9979944,0.00041383962,0.0011166468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004973266,0.00000492064,0.000048341284,0.00002552701,0.0000013047703,0.000013648281,0.00037864505,0.00010719981,0.000028446222,0.9903875,0.008996397,0.0000030468946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00878813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012420638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069444203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006914223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06568742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752717888","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1265","title":"Revitalizing Land Use Law: Introductory Notes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.052099636497167146,"score_gpt":0.3443510968078286,"score_spread":0.29225146031066146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752717888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063686837,0.045007348,0.02676512,0.592678,0.017258305,0.00030985055,0.000122748,0.00016330282,0.31132665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.306092,0.061543286,0.030138342,0.32037884,0.0223028,0.0012904968,0.0001686493,0.0003433269,0.25774232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578947,0.002173734,0.00019467103,0.00040262868,0.00087382726,0.00056570844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605775,0.0029320002,0.0001453133,0.0002293714,0.0004508352,0.0001846996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007327216,0.00093188055,0.00051420124,0.0016614271,0.0067209518,0.009502049,0.0025523845,0.014748423,0.0061891465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108037,0.00040831455,0.0008861624,0.0012629649,0.019085469,0.01245082,0.0059287813,0.01983188,0.0014618462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003679537,0.000019642557,0.00005851715,0.000050548573,0.0000020954296,0.00013687897,0.0020605389,0.00022098089,0.0001102789,0.962851,0.029944014,0.004541827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073224196,0.000030497164,0.00021387494,0.0004295074,0.000003892837,0.00012514777,0.002881656,0.0003109975,0.00023265154,0.2954651,0.7002676,0.000031782518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019050539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019030642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019050539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00525241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073843956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763138432","doi":"","title":"Enforcement Dissonance: Lobsters, the Legislature, and Federal Waters in State v. Thomas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Legislature; Enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Fishery; Law; Economics; Biology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04551994356527655,"score_gpt":0.2918166684997344,"score_spread":0.24629672493445787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763138432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08950237,0.0042884285,0.00093706796,0.7245574,0.003979695,0.00012848504,0.00018999165,0.00009937375,0.17631717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2983879,0.0012670803,0.0004644471,0.64361227,0.0016801207,0.00024469016,0.000087783286,0.000065193824,0.05419042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882609,0.0023609032,0.00044371415,0.0013099102,0.0015713318,0.0060532475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876816,0.006307993,0.00065249915,0.00037388044,0.00097622344,0.0029212849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013808561,0.0006148073,0.00079646043,0.001051434,0.03491651,0.018423554,0.0038480894,0.039777856,0.01045741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021224003,0.0011119377,0.0013940671,0.0010917687,0.010919963,0.00967335,0.0099860355,0.0362776,0.0011013671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001467984,0.00032187218,0.014885731,0.000120801225,0.00008224676,0.006048803,0.041175127,0.00038377388,0.0006146844,0.475987,0.43975925,0.020473812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030859478,0.00021782683,0.019513663,0.0013535158,0.00026387483,0.0015024163,0.0903002,0.0017159588,0.0013330284,0.095149055,0.78788066,0.00046119446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24716505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.343578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24716505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013461422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035904437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4914528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763602987","doi":"10.15396/eres2017_338","title":"Railway vibrations: a challenge for sustainable real estate?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"24th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Train; Vibration; Real estate; Work (physics); Architectural engineering; Engineering; Track (disk drive); Transport engineering; Estate; Function (biology); Computer science; Civil engineering; Business; Mechanical engineering; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.04738103045847139,"score_gpt":0.32368262865753605,"score_spread":0.27630159819906464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763602987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18381391,0.031172305,0.016556164,0.44468942,0.0030690297,0.00007219769,0.0001902759,0.00009285347,0.3203438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321277,0.018371029,0.0021733113,0.008658586,0.00058516505,0.000038918344,0.000085693755,0.000067544184,0.03789203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878377,0.00046809163,0.00003789538,0.00013993258,0.00027750392,0.00029277205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992099,0.00020278206,0.00013639769,0.000058479924,0.00013895068,0.0002534708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011746354,0.00024628895,0.00033630166,0.00031106034,0.0021403062,0.008604912,0.0010042747,0.0029081062,0.0089257555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017386301,0.00016422663,0.00024375822,0.00082106306,0.007463578,0.007620153,0.0045656716,0.0020823404,0.001087833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003079991,0.000076975506,0.006369307,0.0004269687,0.000027991427,0.0012667072,0.034963362,0.0019961675,0.0011280347,0.79800117,0.06378697,0.09192554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397796,0.00005001179,0.007249223,0.00074164354,0.000008026442,0.00050029415,0.13593842,0.0009635755,0.00022997831,0.18808313,0.6661842,0.00004214673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0170251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02387139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0170251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003275807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034596126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03385204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790353047","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's laws of Canada. Volume 5R, Environment.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science","score_opus":0.010870993592990914,"score_gpt":0.1965079187101728,"score_spread":0.1856369251171819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790353047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018214546,0.07742759,0.0008150238,0.023233544,0.0020983948,0.000082398954,0.009158059,0.00033776189,0.88502586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024619244,0.027126377,0.0015203493,0.0045399466,0.00025831853,0.00004329734,0.0021154615,0.00016828965,0.93960863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831843,0.000050889517,0.00003892031,0.0000988034,0.0011872322,0.00030573862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989766,0.0000771492,0.000039598646,0.000042547734,0.00075244595,0.000111717985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048194177,0.0008162592,0.00045708517,0.003093969,0.0062351283,0.005473392,0.0014102604,0.0018788162,0.0488135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022226032,0.0005658592,0.0004120311,0.0045002997,0.0028460096,0.0018269522,0.001070569,0.0023772074,0.00805406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010068889,0.000012046332,0.00037611416,0.00010764512,0.0000036814504,0.0000472844,0.000504486,0.000097757154,0.0001009755,0.078511,0.8871494,0.033079565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015529413,0.0000013485692,0.0012668371,0.00009088573,0.0000027832393,0.000019388503,0.00023860767,0.000027325412,0.000051847648,0.0024164745,0.9958752,0.000007795595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93622375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06377624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11440659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46273118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801579507","doi":"","title":"Owning and Dissolving Strata Property","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Dissolution; Law; Confusion; Business; Dissenting opinion; Law and economics; Property rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03740769300889654,"score_gpt":0.30144146361700486,"score_spread":0.2640337706081083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801579507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5986452,0.00035427525,0.00585244,0.0016385858,0.000086745225,0.00021311411,0.00011098789,0.000052374595,0.39304635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301574,0.00018173963,0.001389638,0.00053571997,0.000023554463,0.000044156113,0.00008524588,0.00001917362,0.06756337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947737,0.0007059812,0.00019989659,0.0005817162,0.00205963,0.0016790999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690104,0.0009199291,0.0003300953,0.0007114395,0.00060378225,0.0005336066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028291214,0.00026649973,0.0003410599,0.001042108,0.009090031,0.005997643,0.0016673091,0.001539095,0.0069505787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058956277,0.00043034187,0.00044236224,0.0010237274,0.008490448,0.0025057981,0.004228011,0.0026817636,0.00070967886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111950685,0.00011750358,0.06995373,0.000102481994,0.00003862659,0.0029456692,0.041115023,0.0009622341,0.0040803323,0.78938913,0.010026188,0.08115704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009677342,0.00049151416,0.12077251,0.00049633946,0.00026732107,0.0031637298,0.0855019,0.005755956,0.018759908,0.09443012,0.6700687,0.00019522071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2222057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5113927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2222057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066172048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008315476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44182462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280544097","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1084571","title":"Property Rights and Development: The Contingent Case for Formalization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Transition (genetics); Precondition; Political science; Institutional change; Sociology; Economics; Law; Economic system; Epistemology; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030575768336170758,"score_gpt":0.26942862663083444,"score_spread":0.23885285829466368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280544097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08797448,0.0022396327,0.34006107,0.04568152,0.00030235358,0.00023623007,0.00028242153,0.00018265433,0.52303964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97730494,0.00041052038,0.013248241,0.00082813436,0.00019056282,0.00021873692,0.000055010263,0.00004055452,0.0077033816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331725,0.0031317186,0.00031252846,0.0012575861,0.0009623405,0.0010185719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98114645,0.011157761,0.0013969071,0.004475422,0.0011174334,0.00070601783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011425463,0.0005095153,0.0010774487,0.001535306,0.005045907,0.00809854,0.002511448,0.005553205,0.012208144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021500573,0.0005902323,0.001455948,0.0014192666,0.037669044,0.01806478,0.0071518407,0.008294139,0.0006543669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016198628,0.0000027919834,0.000020524407,0.0000024335907,9.157176e-7,0.000009772919,0.000046424593,0.00009873339,0.000010817325,0.99943846,0.00007594658,0.0002916699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008882326,0.0000032418193,0.000031289772,0.000010800243,0.0000019431884,0.000015165981,0.000044931756,0.00054962205,0.000028599039,0.99761283,0.001690157,0.0000026206976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043667853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023582669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012208144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050948756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048797503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060424387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889358966","doi":"10.5167/uzh-133185","title":"Laws from ‘Heaven’ to ‘Nature’: some afterthoughts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Leipzig; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Universität Zürich; Universität Heidelberg; University of Oxford; Brandeis University; University of Cambridge; American Philosophical Society; York University; Boston College","keywords":"Heaven; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.014257469502273152,"score_gpt":0.2310932553342878,"score_spread":0.21683578583201463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889358966","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005830887,0.6063577,0.0063006193,0.18946704,0.0073265685,0.00002222195,0.00021992391,0.00005320053,0.18442191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39246252,0.38930035,0.007795611,0.073647276,0.010943073,0.00015309629,0.00046918014,0.00036212892,0.124866776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992182,0.0003055348,0.00004341976,0.000109011205,0.00024266288,0.00008110835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876285,0.00085887674,0.00004388058,0.000083796804,0.00021076383,0.00003981975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025563352,0.00075198937,0.00062945945,0.0015815519,0.002275637,0.0035652912,0.0013506962,0.003053427,0.0066322605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002547314,0.00031869637,0.0003427498,0.0023733962,0.019848632,0.013222007,0.0020686353,0.0061783185,0.0011171199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008729363,0.000010800273,0.000082297665,0.00014024481,0.0000038051587,0.000094006245,0.008805631,0.00010389549,0.00006203941,0.9238006,0.048850592,0.018037356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049049036,0.000008776753,0.0003390142,0.00081968785,0.0000045129673,0.00018161183,0.004106256,0.00007073688,0.00015322419,0.43845874,0.5558423,0.000010234013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009390643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014464477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009390643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036479624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018301804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026467979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28930196","doi":"10.3390/ijerph14091089","title":"FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE ONE AND TWO DIRECTOR STATUTES","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"North-West University; South Africa Netherlands research Programme on Alternatives in Development; Population Health Research Institute","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Corporation; Governor; Law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Order (exchange); Management; Business; Engineering; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.1451607574747402,"score_gpt":0.4186292728999549,"score_spread":0.27346851542521466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28930196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017444046,0.005568218,0.001319754,0.87793654,0.029623687,0.00003795576,0.00040237294,0.00009724164,0.0832698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056584965,0.006866434,0.0041421726,0.64589566,0.024555003,0.00022328482,0.0004580463,0.0002837039,0.26099074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930059,0.0022558165,0.0003895412,0.001016764,0.0019631048,0.0013688151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888474,0.0048310016,0.00049636036,0.0007562701,0.0039073857,0.0011615361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009435634,0.00068887486,0.000780263,0.0017733705,0.007559523,0.009195974,0.0025383679,0.012797282,0.038577422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030876152,0.0004037609,0.0014909245,0.001692919,0.008315964,0.012788881,0.0034755855,0.016426768,0.00806039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029019211,0.000023033806,0.00058188953,0.000043415428,0.0000051799407,0.00012295204,0.0011928694,0.00004532376,0.000063897176,0.32664216,0.66153055,0.009719618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013696759,0.00001580469,0.00070832315,0.00022616764,0.000005860845,0.00010566371,0.0021463253,0.00009949986,0.0000734993,0.03253546,0.9640337,0.000035871224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028620299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029579444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038577422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004970148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072887563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12905431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916627404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5690","title":"Freedom and Access to Housing: Three Conceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative liberty; Premise; State (computer science); Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10248292355161469,"score_gpt":0.3805958446446976,"score_spread":0.2781129210930829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916627404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09200669,0.0194376,0.06750736,0.05669354,0.0006725147,0.00017660236,0.00038163483,0.00015726165,0.76296675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969715,0.005020761,0.0075754244,0.0020153285,0.0003878138,0.00029663226,0.00013765796,0.000050652157,0.0148006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953094,0.0016618691,0.00019416123,0.0006326018,0.0013660615,0.00083598023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727875,0.0013250608,0.0003325511,0.00040793847,0.0002702562,0.00038547366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005066388,0.00084940024,0.00083366473,0.003915019,0.0057536853,0.011854193,0.0024314784,0.0043620714,0.0056893025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005108756,0.00049663463,0.001382353,0.0027473597,0.0854581,0.015276085,0.014023372,0.0067071947,0.00045541962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025445722,0.0000059070953,0.000111470625,0.00000856695,0.0000010160352,0.000011028511,0.001336419,0.000057931873,0.000012436152,0.9969415,0.00022043355,0.0012907557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009640912,0.000009265104,0.0005671423,0.0000925815,0.0000043826403,0.00005410262,0.0019687456,0.0002622073,0.00006378082,0.98030204,0.016652104,0.00001405865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008180842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044130203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011854193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009420071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038510293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06834769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917896605","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n1p98","title":"State Responsibility and the Question of Expropriation: A Preliminary to the “Land Expropriation without Compensation” Policy in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); International law; Government (linguistics); Law; Foreign direct investment; State responsibility; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.019741528244919235,"score_gpt":0.30169641994618135,"score_spread":0.2819548917012621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917896605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20464492,0.010904737,0.011229899,0.39559248,0.0008669253,0.0002243169,0.000052476495,0.000014024987,0.3764703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684286,0.0035001978,0.000986502,0.01185197,0.00027483652,0.00010053778,0.00000942486,0.000010581386,0.014837303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947582,0.0030483662,0.0002105485,0.00038763444,0.0005065965,0.0010885888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903562,0.008118824,0.00056498434,0.0001878432,0.0004621398,0.00031003292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008112495,0.00034864133,0.00046949025,0.0013218084,0.014612182,0.012069916,0.0013849495,0.009905361,0.003906634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013498142,0.00047109625,0.00093455473,0.0016897146,0.03162514,0.011785226,0.007313169,0.01363454,0.00020362025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003926246,0.0000148722,0.00044359345,0.00003551849,0.0000016095097,0.00047164698,0.021628503,0.00013112316,0.00007598617,0.9751016,0.0009075398,0.0011841264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032040105,0.000079433004,0.004975515,0.0013984651,0.000026609516,0.00080813776,0.12603734,0.0014357019,0.0008383532,0.5505524,0.3137436,0.00007245105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04065685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039211273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04065685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012149235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013883115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08814925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940566018","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2019.67.1.krever","title":"Non-Residents and Capital Gains Tax in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital gains tax; Taxable income; State income tax; Tax reform; Economics; International taxation; Double taxation; Tax avoidance; Withholding tax; Capital (architecture); Income tax; Ad valorem tax; Indirect tax; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic policy; Accounting; Geography","score_opus":0.02777445330689098,"score_gpt":0.26016266929403625,"score_spread":0.23238821598714526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940566018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53473616,0.009509759,0.0025607932,0.02461046,0.0005408717,0.0001532618,0.00037585635,0.00005631115,0.42745653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74606556,0.0048522297,0.0016360173,0.0037006605,0.00015340083,0.000045202978,0.0001355035,0.00002245189,0.24338892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929655,0.000092472874,0.000035221405,0.000097538825,0.0003261073,0.00015201874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992867,0.000072437004,0.00012411107,0.000044818302,0.00029154998,0.00018042374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049819454,0.00011616057,0.00015389411,0.00061316555,0.0022193284,0.0017561644,0.00046727393,0.00091739255,0.0038910506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017672031,0.00019959167,0.00019572116,0.0006692602,0.0016485323,0.0011376304,0.0017596354,0.0020352895,0.0003306567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073552445,0.00019647458,0.039185833,0.00025509615,0.000021504646,0.0026202358,0.018703565,0.0020244156,0.0019611814,0.8043671,0.037682615,0.09290846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019404652,0.00011105011,0.18325865,0.00037604908,0.000030627445,0.0012599729,0.004375576,0.004196805,0.0011378451,0.05512072,0.7500289,0.00008446378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38481617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43101788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38481617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008775483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011139123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7651526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945448988","doi":"","title":"Memphis Fights Blight: Collaborating to Win the Battle Against Vacant and Abandoned Property","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bridges Conversations in Global Politics and Public Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memphis; Battle; Property value; Blight; Property (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Public administration; Environmental planning; Archaeology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.023886984082813815,"score_gpt":0.2956647615693657,"score_spread":0.2717777774865519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945448988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024763135,0.0033700739,0.0020555416,0.7672145,0.014307656,0.0000997764,0.00026291804,0.00025151815,0.18767491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2871078,0.0032289,0.0054041934,0.22009516,0.002977156,0.00032182244,0.00028471416,0.0006289172,0.4799513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684,0.0016413894,0.000037614187,0.00018376633,0.00028278143,0.001014304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98775256,0.003050221,0.00033685178,0.0003092043,0.0009610586,0.007590041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070377435,0.0006733904,0.00036324366,0.0006202683,0.022501826,0.008801041,0.0012272648,0.0067469035,0.07977788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012353541,0.0005018708,0.0002722688,0.000578777,0.0060468395,0.006687898,0.0066428212,0.014937504,0.010278697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053144453,0.00006273357,0.0007617493,0.000051280273,0.000008507419,0.00035637585,0.008305223,0.000074859614,0.00035310478,0.011175633,0.9581333,0.020664087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002161972,0.000041841195,0.001222582,0.0001893392,0.0000055584965,0.000076543234,0.060045745,0.00019094071,0.00024252538,0.006537544,0.93139756,0.000028231201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028645243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079370685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07977788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032935694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013804405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2668836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977184238","doi":"10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4208","title":"The Position and the Development Trends Private Property and Common Property","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Public property; Property law; Property rights; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economic history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.03164252809627051,"score_gpt":0.3110576130483996,"score_spread":0.2794150849521291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977184238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09675354,0.027377713,0.007152995,0.12070463,0.00039548558,0.000026545074,0.00008298695,0.000025911419,0.7474802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98074967,0.003912467,0.0009387522,0.0016600693,0.0002561513,0.000022235048,0.000016904694,0.000015972046,0.01242775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496174,0.0021966833,0.00014530576,0.0008449728,0.001153605,0.0006976865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932581,0.0034886873,0.0010147446,0.00061619375,0.0008531384,0.00076916063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00562336,0.00021785911,0.00036949237,0.0024525065,0.006299605,0.012856647,0.0008503016,0.0043281964,0.0049487255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008489697,0.00027512695,0.00029160822,0.00326253,0.062295675,0.019136911,0.007396895,0.0061923326,0.00047239065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002781252,0.0000030381407,0.000108627544,0.000004172224,4.854571e-7,0.000012971173,0.0011156468,0.000017326207,0.000015526239,0.9968549,0.00034707962,0.0015173692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012693322,0.000024840234,0.0016749667,0.0001410536,0.0000047246563,0.000099709876,0.0037840712,0.00029792127,0.00014981949,0.8969848,0.09681189,0.000013694473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009635122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009403608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013039918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013039918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005707939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094611645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991919886","doi":"10.29173/alr2578","title":"Let's Talk About Royalties: The Continued Uncertainty Surrounding the Creation and Legal Status of the Overriding Royalty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Supreme court; Property law; Law; Energy law; Property (philosophy); Capital (architecture); Law and economics; Economics; Business; Property rights; Political science; Environmental law","score_opus":0.016490411099595977,"score_gpt":0.2898602242173984,"score_spread":0.2733698131178024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991919886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031846467,0.03806959,0.009999331,0.70024294,0.001881887,0.000026247437,0.0001105246,0.00006113897,0.2177619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8305353,0.012244409,0.0033548784,0.11800479,0.0020390335,0.000025333731,0.00003811416,0.000070594106,0.03368764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835532,0.004326125,0.00040274955,0.0021027084,0.0074924203,0.0021228692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98334527,0.011542362,0.0012289939,0.0009012888,0.0024636437,0.0005183384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011195131,0.00032045404,0.0006229898,0.0016108756,0.009843557,0.015653117,0.003101582,0.011308746,0.0023431212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026456194,0.00037777456,0.0005849869,0.0016919111,0.050494507,0.009760906,0.0031695717,0.01401688,0.000488612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043663376,0.000004465043,0.00024080231,0.000021772556,0.0000067514843,0.00012204129,0.0021572015,0.00015044956,0.000094198156,0.98012835,0.010499223,0.0065703057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018125389,0.000029782741,0.002720393,0.0006063971,0.000026711949,0.00026684694,0.005721297,0.00054639514,0.00058642623,0.67809755,0.31127575,0.00010436063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32215294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35171098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.677847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028319074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025745276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6405556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W305844978","doi":"","title":"Eminent Domain in Oil and Gas: Tax Treatment When a Pipeline Devalues Surrounding Property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Easement; Pipeline (software); Natural gas; Revenue; Engineering; Petroleum industry; Business; Finance; Waste management; Law; Environmental engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.029668317621907206,"score_gpt":0.27344321884272793,"score_spread":0.24377490122082074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W305844978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19922374,0.0016413401,0.013285832,0.06961791,0.0024037098,0.0008266406,0.0022589562,0.0009968546,0.70974505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7606876,0.0016906027,0.0058566113,0.008635792,0.0006232897,0.00031562982,0.001668001,0.00021617788,0.22030625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992342,0.00012248254,0.00003941416,0.000055093653,0.00024799182,0.0003008406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981864,0.00027756923,0.00032581648,0.00013904434,0.0006496452,0.00042145897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010887525,0.00017161654,0.00014612972,0.0011124827,0.003257332,0.0018083552,0.0010119969,0.002031721,0.035546836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005688884,0.00016058855,0.00022288701,0.0010851176,0.0008291241,0.0020428349,0.0015197123,0.001976961,0.004349399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021381277,0.00043674785,0.08424019,0.0001734381,0.0000124127755,0.004877396,0.00236026,0.0014575404,0.0013120349,0.09810691,0.5716983,0.23511104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003159041,0.00015319884,0.047828954,0.0004027293,0.000016398739,0.0028111083,0.014108509,0.00537049,0.0021740033,0.02482498,0.9022302,0.000047909856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015171576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03606036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035546836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021234208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004727007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118916035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094481967","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3651556","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Natural resource economics; Pollution; Business; Public economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.021449565580174718,"score_gpt":0.25554899140292386,"score_spread":0.23409942582274915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094481967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13203421,0.0027191024,0.03646035,0.26814538,0.0013936209,0.00011165422,0.000082357794,0.00009568013,0.55895764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801446,0.0003465384,0.0016944658,0.008737937,0.0007409346,0.000051913587,0.000008041726,0.000030875104,0.008244726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903452,0.0050983867,0.0002941134,0.0009281448,0.0017259236,0.0016082485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97688955,0.01833078,0.0014772966,0.0014059186,0.0012442636,0.0006521797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013716809,0.00037746856,0.0007621257,0.0014886673,0.010603064,0.015633982,0.0020129986,0.018302029,0.007705401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042290945,0.00055747264,0.00077420566,0.0014416291,0.039376833,0.015345911,0.0065406095,0.021373376,0.0007168743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071493755,0.000008036296,0.00006754941,0.000004114384,0.0000019702547,0.00002459951,0.00085972087,0.00015009906,0.000030483252,0.9971169,0.0009542611,0.00077506405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020476691,0.000006038018,0.0002170126,0.000026108191,0.000008772923,0.000010510584,0.00070786616,0.00074710755,0.00011601665,0.9895856,0.008541017,0.000013469948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014309819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01521664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008819621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01182865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07254225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121940334","doi":"","title":"The Hand Is Invincible, Nature Knows Best, and Justice Is Blind: Markets, Ecosystems, Legal Instrumentalism, and the Natural Law of Systems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Law and economics; Law; Explication; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017381783659079015,"score_gpt":0.26767914648139224,"score_spread":0.25029736282231324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121940334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047717106,0.060055077,0.024632577,0.51116127,0.0016747339,0.00005497259,0.0000832361,0.00009076976,0.35453025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94460624,0.012733062,0.004724713,0.016660763,0.001980761,0.0001258013,0.000036006848,0.00006314404,0.019069413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943704,0.0036724012,0.0000924706,0.0004084405,0.00083605427,0.00062025816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893003,0.008244002,0.00096746197,0.0004825077,0.0004910249,0.00051466137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007160601,0.00054668356,0.00049911096,0.0018804882,0.008709631,0.015796566,0.0019238291,0.007988573,0.004379579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010088591,0.00044881843,0.00038371587,0.0022577506,0.07804489,0.024969632,0.0056422083,0.007441896,0.00043746742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047090057,0.000009046048,0.000105392864,0.000015398444,0.0000013750331,0.000032220134,0.0012100454,0.00013896903,0.000011783438,0.99299556,0.0033109302,0.002164761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005643819,0.000007561936,0.00018136344,0.000090707974,0.0000016762423,0.000034008546,0.0018730015,0.0004882404,0.00002961589,0.9772654,0.020014519,0.000008241025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071339956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006862835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015796566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008206327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006808331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059541345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123528069","doi":"10.7916/cblr.v2017i3.1727","title":"Progressive Era Conceptions of the Corporation and the Failure of the Federal Chartering Movement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Corporate law; Legislation; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Scholarship; Federal law; Law; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.020572453192991936,"score_gpt":0.27365853854944044,"score_spread":0.2530860853564485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123528069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13502654,0.014893995,0.032445326,0.09802111,0.00072710303,0.000055146185,0.00005042948,0.00009500369,0.71868527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97738314,0.002441743,0.002546163,0.0042238287,0.00035012813,0.00003813161,0.000016234193,0.000024399853,0.0129763065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936453,0.0028393534,0.0001714126,0.0009605995,0.0013371384,0.001046298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940671,0.003518247,0.00074005837,0.00064646004,0.00068001467,0.000348157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008939315,0.0002725098,0.00027868807,0.0021996002,0.009180165,0.010688764,0.0009737223,0.0047470354,0.00193923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009663776,0.00025926848,0.00034720823,0.0015468856,0.04968651,0.0106542045,0.0034021146,0.0075677093,0.00022840823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011791917,0.0000017903699,0.000045025245,0.0000015051345,2.623005e-7,0.0000063234384,0.00093509286,0.000028630979,0.000007837985,0.997795,0.00027606095,0.0009012786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016149092,0.000029402601,0.001310739,0.00014239304,0.000009383817,0.00006364015,0.0023361677,0.0006903348,0.00023890095,0.8450562,0.1500872,0.000019538167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01651331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014367818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01651331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013427232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008870621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097421885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123978572","doi":"","title":"The Rhino's Horn: Incomplete Property Rights and the Optimal Value of an Asset","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Asset (computer security); Property rights; Value (mathematics); Business; Property (philosophy); Private property; Public property; French horn; Book value; Economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Market economy; Computer science; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.02804498627541722,"score_gpt":0.2664841892460309,"score_spread":0.2384392029706137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123978572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32096726,0.006304891,0.1937013,0.017227551,0.0002446801,0.00012821401,0.00020706483,0.0000559046,0.46116313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786386,0.0012974029,0.011130796,0.00027908394,0.00007416352,0.00004563721,0.000024036694,0.00002083526,0.008489444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998437,0.0007477657,0.000066922454,0.00022989606,0.00026534338,0.0002531296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963217,0.002226239,0.0004887048,0.00053781737,0.00019622073,0.00022937138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003688825,0.00030928547,0.00075727125,0.00073430163,0.0011668853,0.00569679,0.0010939868,0.0024965366,0.0064628194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010775293,0.00030329303,0.0005065649,0.000768222,0.0130411275,0.0071309768,0.0024350502,0.0029684475,0.00037654454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015270369,0.0000059780464,0.0001244441,0.000009996957,0.000004625295,0.00002934007,0.00006818564,0.0020519036,0.00011047607,0.99398476,0.00029874287,0.0032963306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012124039,0.000011437373,0.0001404627,0.00002629155,0.0000045535703,0.000025843534,0.00009189639,0.003942501,0.00007780945,0.993803,0.0018592951,0.0000046575383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002727914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041391086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064628194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027982872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020901393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021620274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124178933","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights, Resource Development, And The Source Of The Provincial Duty To Consult In Haida Nation And Taku River","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Duty; Resource (disambiguation); Supreme court; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012240639394103008,"score_gpt":0.25896639012319955,"score_spread":0.24672575072909655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124178933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3561738,0.0017528348,0.0008328574,0.022259114,0.000109735796,0.000069298134,0.00007417438,0.000015459687,0.61871266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440541,0.0005060788,0.00037634367,0.0018017103,0.000020975443,0.000039000875,0.000022612889,0.00001093296,0.053168308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996705,0.00047337875,0.00006956369,0.00023447697,0.0006927766,0.0018248629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973786,0.00090975425,0.0002231608,0.00014444721,0.0005828327,0.0007612657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019626627,0.00017051862,0.0002713729,0.00079703255,0.025348224,0.011333886,0.0017649191,0.0036181752,0.0047354093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039924127,0.00046221615,0.00025492645,0.0013266646,0.01891845,0.0026546877,0.0048312643,0.0050903237,0.00027070026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030631214,0.00003642525,0.0058547626,0.000046045738,0.0000075922344,0.0018360055,0.0802711,0.00020564285,0.00037662796,0.89703804,0.0056887567,0.008608472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007811327,0.00008904232,0.07286536,0.0007777742,0.00010896811,0.0020060332,0.3017933,0.0018347307,0.0013579476,0.19493249,0.42394957,0.00020668418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90157956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04034832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06914799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29274893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124516724","doi":"","title":"Death to Semelhago","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Damages; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Common law; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.05073519481133954,"score_gpt":0.3128993821918387,"score_spread":0.2621641873804992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124516724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04489115,0.014256659,0.0018135521,0.20994514,0.010572256,0.0000663162,0.00033991007,0.0001776295,0.7179374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23982204,0.004202031,0.00059876905,0.14145318,0.0011520628,0.000044921133,0.00013195087,0.000100020276,0.612495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988243,0.00012968255,0.00002176187,0.0002361097,0.00034064156,0.0004473952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00010789637,0.000024860366,0.000040942024,0.0001868399,0.0001446677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009868377,0.00048520137,0.00034979222,0.00045023402,0.013667053,0.0033861464,0.000942066,0.0062030526,0.012493493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031584364,0.0001876859,0.000457237,0.00033297704,0.0050895973,0.0016589725,0.0036417318,0.011243756,0.0022141426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000641787,0.000026948532,0.0015872282,0.000055962868,0.000018540273,0.0014888924,0.0053709187,0.00014159882,0.00056106754,0.5963999,0.36124372,0.03304095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009608337,0.000026623577,0.0010044888,0.00014449425,0.000010486531,0.0004170355,0.0018881301,0.000097076496,0.00033909242,0.019648433,0.9763945,0.000020053509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2565929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44628745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2565929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009269283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01603026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5101987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353358","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.445","title":"PERSON, PLACE, OR THING? PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Structuring; Property rights; Epistemology; Intuition; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013791017483509402,"score_gpt":0.22701702171855773,"score_spread":0.21322600423504834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125353358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15268315,0.010999898,0.1519124,0.09882338,0.000491227,0.000108156244,0.00016488036,0.0001995768,0.58461726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98363423,0.0011837529,0.006436806,0.0013983866,0.00016283979,0.00005579821,0.00002681725,0.000025292402,0.0070760217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674475,0.001992572,0.000108097614,0.00042080454,0.00036748964,0.00036620672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776185,0.0010844403,0.0003078708,0.00044355768,0.00017157143,0.00023077993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034886207,0.0002421363,0.0004906742,0.0011641907,0.0042707054,0.006198296,0.0010819043,0.0025025583,0.0039812773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038473983,0.0002685297,0.0005159985,0.0012133595,0.055151008,0.012673425,0.004556739,0.002514387,0.00060338096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024782878,0.000002655427,0.0001238496,0.000006480417,0.0000014070664,0.000018896779,0.0017707522,0.00007587536,0.000028011893,0.99607027,0.00027465212,0.0016247786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068562904,0.000007268393,0.0002840129,0.000024210862,0.0000018774199,0.000031830525,0.0015006317,0.00018280363,0.00004779996,0.9793682,0.018539578,0.000004887243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005949879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046644607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006198296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038794444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028415015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028147459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125518739","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1179","title":"Changing Nature: The Myth of the Inevitability of Ecosystem Management","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Ecosystem management; Legitimacy; Natural (archaeology); Total human ecosystem; Precautionary principle; Environmental ethics; Utilitarianism; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Natural resource; Relevance (law); Ecosystem valuation; State (computer science); Ecosystem services; Ecology; Ecosystem health; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Computer science; Biology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009999540753997602,"score_gpt":0.24632671474118428,"score_spread":0.23632717398718667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125518739","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021126578,0.02999529,0.0343179,0.56877834,0.0020322958,0.00004408392,0.000053087806,0.000062065395,0.34359032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8760698,0.014193764,0.009767864,0.0750389,0.0034943619,0.00025242395,0.00004104928,0.00007200485,0.021069892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074495,0.0051234234,0.00028834312,0.0009636112,0.002264197,0.00061546994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900115,0.007310894,0.00064638536,0.00087830133,0.000700134,0.00045286553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101821115,0.00030969977,0.00043112182,0.001269657,0.005194703,0.008967317,0.0016922575,0.006708866,0.0025795614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012989778,0.00024581412,0.00048440538,0.0007979886,0.06588031,0.0123061575,0.0044970796,0.008568156,0.00042570723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002622244,0.0000053363788,0.00008389768,0.000016073322,0.0000023917141,0.000023728631,0.00054287934,0.00012580118,0.000025143587,0.99461526,0.002319238,0.0022376888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006531633,0.000008206329,0.00014359415,0.000097054166,0.0000024166975,0.000038127706,0.00043234706,0.00018483488,0.000040443963,0.94163465,0.057405822,0.000005940924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029299285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029053313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0101821115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055089504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054605203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053848803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125995196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2759","title":"The (ir)relevance of constitutional protection for property rights? Compensation for takings in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Statutory law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Property law; Constitutional law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Government (linguistics); Economics; Private property","score_opus":0.02946621708068886,"score_gpt":0.23164383999305554,"score_spread":0.20217762291236668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125995196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39183623,0.010055712,0.0027169313,0.06297225,0.00023671259,0.00006656917,0.0005701823,0.000053428957,0.531492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236906,0.0011661036,0.00038249523,0.0016663814,0.000021629085,0.000007666381,0.000035996753,0.0000057542425,0.004344788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436635,0.00049867894,0.0001267572,0.00042565315,0.0019756586,0.0026069582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558973,0.0012697042,0.0004447911,0.00019711563,0.0018448109,0.0006537981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026552938,0.00017973865,0.0005423103,0.0021974526,0.0119627435,0.008756494,0.0016610672,0.0025782296,0.004550386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010514912,0.00022174344,0.00050240924,0.0032848122,0.014663351,0.0023523387,0.0018203675,0.003178645,0.00012812273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032582404,0.000012408919,0.005373647,0.00004016106,0.000018470027,0.00013707751,0.002547395,0.0007758827,0.00022725099,0.97776276,0.0036984081,0.0093741305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024322627,0.0001327086,0.26072028,0.0015232495,0.0006280772,0.0007154858,0.045935933,0.009765151,0.0032687595,0.37638342,0.30019045,0.00049320754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99232167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11283164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11283164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11832847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81865466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126012770","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3145","title":"The Philosopher and the Developer: Pluralist Moral Theory and the Law of Condominium","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Doctrine; Law and economics; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Property (philosophy); Legislation; Legislature; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Private property; Politics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030276685438155634,"score_gpt":0.29357808617889103,"score_spread":0.2633014007407354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126012770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07596912,0.028222118,0.07220898,0.312195,0.0016702531,0.000045636338,0.00005285942,0.000095939584,0.50954014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93910164,0.005343654,0.006245908,0.0084167505,0.0010616154,0.00006707258,0.000022212933,0.00008066537,0.039660364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450976,0.0039695962,0.00009886768,0.00037119622,0.0007612621,0.00028937613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563193,0.003041341,0.00034415774,0.00032590947,0.0003517267,0.0003049761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007855774,0.0003043445,0.00034549471,0.001338507,0.0061588525,0.0073388587,0.0013080786,0.004418026,0.0036149842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008024958,0.00034640369,0.00034544218,0.0013747187,0.03736195,0.010834422,0.005437271,0.0058916383,0.00043783558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021164922,0.0000042544034,0.00008721585,0.0000073891865,6.045623e-7,0.000024460092,0.0016726443,0.000056776582,0.000017872599,0.99562246,0.0011925139,0.0013116038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012494759,0.000016280565,0.000284355,0.000116239324,0.0000034785116,0.0000692286,0.002955788,0.0007041955,0.00012775879,0.9054059,0.09029442,0.000009920118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049548717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050481777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007855774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061110086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004927647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044338703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126145074","doi":"","title":"Reforming Property Law to Address Devastating Land Loss","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Real property; Real estate; Statute; Estate; Partition (number theory); Property (philosophy); Legislation; Business; Property law; Property rights; Law and economics; State (computer science); Law; Economics; Finance; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02608475479028058,"score_gpt":0.2872730475029215,"score_spread":0.2611882927126409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126145074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053397138,0.0068393555,0.059427004,0.288184,0.0061071655,0.0003447044,0.00015889152,0.0013183372,0.5842234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69837135,0.005235095,0.017885601,0.1222221,0.0034004475,0.0003205805,0.00022229503,0.00037966287,0.15196295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951468,0.0009989181,0.0001912602,0.0006477967,0.0018125853,0.0012027187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923564,0.0027856706,0.0006886478,0.0010176472,0.002262967,0.000888794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069824047,0.000457373,0.0003263213,0.0018469503,0.0048859622,0.007437276,0.0032472026,0.007691443,0.015000107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02017146,0.00035581275,0.0007180219,0.0008597313,0.008640203,0.00989073,0.006531293,0.00931773,0.0025008067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016536533,0.00021657911,0.0017768532,0.00008443719,0.000016457429,0.00050278986,0.0025295673,0.0012948209,0.0009298243,0.8535581,0.084592596,0.054481525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056270324,0.0001361779,0.0017500719,0.00038851137,0.000039768027,0.00032421722,0.0026958277,0.0035429124,0.0010900815,0.26175666,0.7281631,0.000056384095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016289331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023526862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016289331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046084896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012093605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050180376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134871093","doi":"10.37381/7kfcpm81","title":"Changing Sovereigns and Settling Land Claims in Florida","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tulane European and Civil Law Forum","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settling; Business; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.01147888679492381,"score_gpt":0.22989497499782285,"score_spread":0.21841608820289904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134871093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65688723,0.0035244108,0.0011713422,0.044207554,0.00031296874,0.000057305748,0.00014414662,0.00003428141,0.29366067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94692457,0.0009605103,0.00036631327,0.003525272,0.00007271851,0.000027048613,0.000051414205,0.000011324487,0.04806078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990879,0.00015304984,0.000017437871,0.00012645609,0.00012199974,0.0004932397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994685,0.00018095996,0.00007862607,0.000026253208,0.00009517758,0.00015046712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014530462,0.0002203648,0.00017350062,0.00085321115,0.018755125,0.0049987137,0.0010075782,0.0026157585,0.0069864728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023390828,0.00023969187,0.00028784474,0.0007085141,0.007677338,0.0045021884,0.005753099,0.005367948,0.00020239962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014640274,0.000105650455,0.010388532,0.00009103349,0.000026070242,0.0031111978,0.16414969,0.00083184015,0.002629137,0.7098959,0.044664543,0.06396003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040016716,0.00014962335,0.02630502,0.00029391595,0.00004668627,0.00041988524,0.071629696,0.00087273895,0.0013380983,0.036978696,0.86180305,0.00012265616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32813433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.593266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32813433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017522883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064430274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6524488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154565668","doi":"","title":"Drilling to the Bottom of the Orphan Well Problem: Suggestions for a Better Regulatory Framework for Preventing and Remediating Orphaned Oil Wells in British Columbia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Orphan drug; Scope (computer science); Bankruptcy; Supreme court; Political science; Engineering; Business; Law","score_opus":0.02117685140328224,"score_gpt":0.3019287645671203,"score_spread":0.2807519131638381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154565668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045495246,0.06304925,0.01078729,0.6883702,0.001624662,0.00032427502,0.0003544132,0.0002653975,0.1897293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63561195,0.086029306,0.022013647,0.17949238,0.00061946874,0.0003071536,0.0003007942,0.000110047185,0.0755153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332833,0.0010268423,0.00041844096,0.00064694544,0.0030364837,0.0015428804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871236,0.004104619,0.0008145594,0.000375603,0.0065994514,0.0009822679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065122675,0.00040433748,0.0006756339,0.0043263966,0.011014801,0.012188637,0.005741015,0.009665692,0.0040250868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013840675,0.0006305649,0.0005994547,0.0030355095,0.015181513,0.0043663955,0.0033745558,0.009911803,0.00030270548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022253309,0.000102630314,0.0059986007,0.0008287989,0.000030837728,0.0014450403,0.005154714,0.0031021554,0.0009887068,0.7957477,0.11839841,0.068180256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079529345,0.00005338044,0.01730671,0.006125263,0.00011373002,0.0005480778,0.01811729,0.0031670043,0.0013238481,0.105823174,0.84704435,0.00029757735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95273674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05607365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05607365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22152497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40684474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161251692","doi":"10.15173/a.v1i2.2818","title":"LAND ETHICS IN CONFLICT","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aletheia","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Lifeworld; Land law; Government (linguistics); Legitimacy; Land tenure; Nonpossessory interest in land; Political science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Social science; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.11380474092978358,"score_gpt":0.3767894480989423,"score_spread":0.2629847071691587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161251692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034315534,0.01012141,0.0155989695,0.07613553,0.0006283711,0.00008601458,0.00006454944,0.00005001841,0.8629996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94929814,0.0024039582,0.0023976984,0.0061067706,0.0002860768,0.00009263953,0.000042650834,0.000040749906,0.039331384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900147,0.0061606294,0.0002573094,0.0008170008,0.0015738095,0.0011766601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501365,0.0025574272,0.0005243955,0.0005137729,0.00085479015,0.0005359876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006092931,0.0003773538,0.00041120473,0.0010596844,0.012475468,0.008884436,0.0013481041,0.0042208214,0.010225122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008715771,0.00021606001,0.00026740224,0.0017447436,0.08312694,0.0063014524,0.008893735,0.003254811,0.00097613357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031093634,0.0000031341451,0.000281026,0.000027671225,0.0000018912881,0.000083618856,0.008919225,0.000121730176,0.00003551541,0.9843789,0.0026301756,0.0035139532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009021929,0.000008435097,0.00054007483,0.00014582154,0.0000034973325,0.00020598913,0.01339162,0.00028394256,0.000099628174,0.63757175,0.34772956,0.000010702858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048865844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050437953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048865844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019141665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017737936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13888317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162521870","doi":"","title":"Summers v. Earth Island Institute","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Statute; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Environmental law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.011657319795292205,"score_gpt":0.2724939326568197,"score_spread":0.2608366128615275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162521870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045526136,0.0040103947,0.000619374,0.107785866,0.002624441,0.00009406859,0.0008650065,0.00036564036,0.838109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2262614,0.0019356485,0.0006491508,0.16625974,0.0010899733,0.00015008113,0.0005582794,0.000117010015,0.6029787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727565,0.00023018755,0.000074972726,0.0004159293,0.0008645862,0.0011386448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998558,0.0005283504,0.0001078697,0.00011172592,0.0003252506,0.0003688452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017293955,0.00044005748,0.00035110925,0.00076742587,0.010743801,0.0036335657,0.0015079459,0.009863985,0.016934002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038811346,0.0006611197,0.00088884146,0.0005840517,0.0027920336,0.0016947985,0.0027938837,0.010195707,0.0025838458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001074845,0.000059564303,0.004577875,0.000105707244,0.00002452222,0.0030181464,0.0025461058,0.0003035683,0.001945915,0.16480905,0.8012374,0.021264702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051868275,0.000067083245,0.013206175,0.00023532326,0.00003784446,0.0005970967,0.0021019226,0.00034809115,0.001502372,0.009976937,0.97178686,0.0000883744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15634584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34046933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15634584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00619673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009346839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3108716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169645979","doi":"","title":"Takings, PASH, and the Changing Coastal Environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Subject (documents); Section (typography); Property rights; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Business; Computer science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.00899563938103796,"score_gpt":0.2335933446062519,"score_spread":0.22459770522521394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169645979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11218325,0.012308867,0.0030949104,0.21464625,0.001778637,0.000025629743,0.000044477565,0.00002912468,0.6558888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947204,0.0045420453,0.00064981333,0.019431725,0.0007760499,0.000018426308,0.000018327812,0.000022562908,0.02733709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976731,0.0008624334,0.00010880725,0.0002943514,0.0005594418,0.0005018435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832803,0.00072183297,0.00026396214,0.00017512111,0.00022643949,0.0002845656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027396334,0.00024279424,0.000286112,0.00058901816,0.009243718,0.0073351804,0.0010415745,0.0045527066,0.0039279545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003029606,0.00021239,0.0004509554,0.0009381138,0.031243408,0.00596277,0.006483135,0.007932986,0.00033132063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005870407,0.000007726328,0.000804349,0.00004189727,0.0000041713024,0.0004800228,0.015351659,0.00015031488,0.00017557325,0.9701572,0.007650655,0.005170491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013017635,0.00005029284,0.004439032,0.00048379763,0.000017603908,0.000559715,0.054865967,0.0003287832,0.00047518345,0.45790237,0.4808011,0.00006311421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017458722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028835425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017458722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004916605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004565984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035672665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175436812","doi":"10.82308/26329","title":"Liberal property and lived property: a critique of abstract universalism in the human right to property","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Universalism; Liberalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04680054956712093,"score_gpt":0.28047559265823513,"score_spread":0.2336750430911142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175436812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052589405,0.017667485,0.13740431,0.23579751,0.0012631905,0.0000937433,0.00014524316,0.00015995225,0.55487925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635978,0.0028849584,0.009115601,0.010993731,0.0007616141,0.00019603621,0.000051638395,0.00014970792,0.012249011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984395,0.009675928,0.00040349676,0.0021534928,0.0023879632,0.0009841842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98580694,0.010378424,0.00076152396,0.0016919359,0.00085418223,0.0005069253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01340815,0.00072119397,0.0010937284,0.002469438,0.00723673,0.013305114,0.003226339,0.00740246,0.0041990625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279309,0.0005276446,0.0012994664,0.0016622151,0.13268366,0.025400298,0.011633388,0.013266707,0.00063207006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002130355,0.0000028495556,0.000025297373,0.000010872506,0.0000010715837,0.000013460882,0.0022462688,0.000042045944,0.000012288574,0.99691427,0.00021014352,0.00051933236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054615193,0.0000043246177,0.000047200625,0.000049835257,0.0000018513553,0.000022362457,0.0010185953,0.00015386865,0.000041265186,0.98622185,0.012427718,0.0000056489407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006575232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035110214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01340815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113205835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056265234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08213693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179302855","doi":"","title":"Reviewing Redwater: An Analysis of the U.S. and Canadian Approaches to Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Statutory law; Environmental law; Law; Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.051187681580645204,"score_gpt":0.2548992073520314,"score_spread":0.2037115257713862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179302855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27340025,0.03134092,0.0017187967,0.047584087,0.00031352925,0.00023524207,0.0009445867,0.000066473476,0.6443962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93714786,0.019550547,0.0011385026,0.0076276115,0.00011056102,0.00007215891,0.0004035093,0.00007785024,0.03387143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831993,0.0015175975,0.00039383455,0.0008912017,0.009873928,0.0041241837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729388,0.0077381902,0.0019275937,0.00061294384,0.014821951,0.0019605106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008416762,0.0005043105,0.0006968626,0.013908382,0.027307497,0.013918104,0.0031216831,0.0030228484,0.0046441425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03232382,0.0004992368,0.0007250838,0.019657338,0.014625459,0.00358141,0.004100743,0.0043729283,0.0002521504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085837855,0.000057858553,0.020273853,0.00043095785,0.00008237817,0.0011356956,0.11811829,0.0019965277,0.0005120812,0.6921819,0.07444129,0.0906833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029887722,0.000045573026,0.13480026,0.0018999605,0.0002501105,0.00026845184,0.15389103,0.0016403756,0.00088316266,0.025481068,0.68054295,0.00026710783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99377453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22373752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22373752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2255394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90035444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191946479","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3881244","title":"Boundary Law Under the New Brunswick Land Titles Act: The Worst of All Possible Worlds","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.015840593661799816,"score_gpt":0.2796596892811451,"score_spread":0.2638190956193453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191946479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05707668,0.0025101532,0.0047112326,0.05403998,0.0005284788,0.00007226304,0.00031221044,0.000039841354,0.8807092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879857,0.0015580225,0.0032064912,0.015842227,0.00023125471,0.00017948615,0.00017316875,0.00009365723,0.090729885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907829,0.0026078704,0.00036903308,0.0010151974,0.0027858687,0.0024391948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994456,0.0027057037,0.00039054448,0.000734021,0.0010790685,0.00063477596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008487245,0.00044300282,0.000954896,0.001965187,0.013754528,0.026162155,0.0034638548,0.013205158,0.01012782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015886601,0.0007474725,0.0006798328,0.002416805,0.031179601,0.010280162,0.00815842,0.010714683,0.0013602464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011312915,0.000005013851,0.00038506632,0.0000073376023,0.0000039978254,0.00007043034,0.0009947091,0.00019089381,0.000060000475,0.99081284,0.0055191093,0.0019393748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005396717,0.000014896857,0.001776542,0.0004129353,0.000042999305,0.00011379278,0.008667638,0.0013050283,0.000640093,0.821645,0.16524085,0.00008624341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38810855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64285773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61189145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03223513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047293972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.771699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197035081","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0132","title":"When, and how, does property matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Law and economics; Nothing; Property law; Property rights; Law; Private property; Intangible property; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Restitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.012809334355310438,"score_gpt":0.2137237181715257,"score_spread":0.20091438381621526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197035081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076086804,0.014388382,0.033894915,0.371076,0.0012928633,0.00009199315,0.00036844384,0.000093174065,0.5027075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564932,0.0036298116,0.0026660638,0.018628165,0.00076236826,0.00006140973,0.000099052224,0.00007619269,0.017583705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98822093,0.0056251357,0.000423799,0.0018045087,0.0022322258,0.0016935624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98495144,0.009110774,0.0011721337,0.0015126838,0.0019519192,0.0013010188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012558236,0.00035566336,0.000994476,0.0011839399,0.007599091,0.010967039,0.0018559508,0.006655192,0.0072989897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018212069,0.00029307455,0.0005534861,0.0015929851,0.07731682,0.018631773,0.004568186,0.0051622917,0.0011025165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047725885,0.0000053400213,0.00044451441,0.000025492001,0.000004762817,0.000041528303,0.0016295211,0.000059624446,0.000041811963,0.99360126,0.0018999404,0.002241407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008442932,0.000012628734,0.0010808338,0.0001449651,0.000013541265,0.000058451336,0.0046350695,0.00016409867,0.00014127018,0.93968856,0.054037623,0.000014473917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037987832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02656974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037987832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137569215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012472173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09981394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214682557","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0042.br","title":"Hanoch Dagan, <i>A Liberal Theory of Property</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018800059681103348,"score_gpt":0.2283910366791582,"score_spread":0.20959097699805485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214682557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009509801,0.103028506,0.00904427,0.6003637,0.0066297012,0.000044229884,0.00091221405,0.00008600992,0.2703816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5136541,0.060986586,0.009039824,0.17671055,0.007109779,0.00022852918,0.00038029527,0.00019510857,0.23169528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858713,0.0005321144,0.00005360201,0.00019780207,0.00042303704,0.00020633446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776506,0.0015601447,0.00011825856,0.00014149297,0.0003035401,0.000111551424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022564104,0.00039883022,0.00036088045,0.0009055531,0.005291888,0.004029126,0.001098506,0.0054759523,0.0062047755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007544038,0.00047130775,0.00031970613,0.0015954913,0.0075580566,0.006530714,0.0014704829,0.005078745,0.0011342305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008881403,0.0000046015734,0.00010892154,0.00003289009,0.0000031652462,0.000019921317,0.0006585886,0.00005365502,0.00002651773,0.8861021,0.1108059,0.002174856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021296893,0.0000039562156,0.00082398375,0.000109611494,0.000008960391,0.000038756887,0.0009178494,0.00014863072,0.00026288742,0.652468,0.3451748,0.000021251448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06826604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1256609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93173397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067243264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00521362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13573736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W342249510","doi":"","title":"Non-Compliance in a Dangerous Time: The Pitfalls of Section 27 of the Surface Rights Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Business; Law and economics; Compensation (psychology); Property rights; Incentive; Negotiation; Liability; Landlord; Easement; Finance; Law; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.02478156130461846,"score_gpt":0.2811178118612537,"score_spread":0.2563362505566352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W342249510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08898278,0.0022549073,0.033548962,0.36949423,0.0032241829,0.00031978733,0.0001357657,0.0006441906,0.5013951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6509923,0.0016209971,0.016392786,0.2120192,0.0015919206,0.0006828022,0.00018541414,0.00047861302,0.1160359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9326149,0.022675673,0.0049566263,0.005166105,0.027691891,0.0068947943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8967232,0.0730723,0.0056085642,0.0075579304,0.012601688,0.004436304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05353964,0.0004523678,0.0006295561,0.0008942428,0.008124847,0.0141449375,0.0036184865,0.016888047,0.00439354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08944227,0.0008452587,0.0011569026,0.0009045368,0.01392994,0.008064166,0.0060249865,0.022681516,0.0025983378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047067846,0.00015104908,0.0032910323,0.0000700903,0.000017079015,0.0010362851,0.009773774,0.0009259369,0.0013455624,0.86431044,0.08492752,0.034104228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077832075,0.00029990188,0.0078555485,0.001214799,0.000051559673,0.0015795651,0.013836737,0.005066301,0.0024441518,0.2432469,0.72397363,0.00035314806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024131028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03575007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05353964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057973876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044903774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2831481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205177291","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006359.v1","title":"The fiscal nullity doctrine in New Zealand","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Revenue; Political science; Fiscal year; Economic history; Economics; Geography; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.019830691921551562,"score_gpt":0.3111477209807346,"score_spread":0.29131702905918305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205177291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09317466,0.0049071694,0.0016911597,0.022225142,0.00020749698,0.000067929795,0.0000829716,0.00001557207,0.8776279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895654,0.0045040343,0.0013621853,0.0066941897,0.00017794053,0.00012142466,0.000048909526,0.00004296427,0.0913943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514943,0.000740577,0.00030397277,0.0006386615,0.0018340964,0.0013332178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973201,0.0010092801,0.00046237808,0.00025825325,0.00060964795,0.00034035178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004433851,0.00031043642,0.00065484917,0.0015863389,0.009289874,0.013528845,0.0014000848,0.0045953705,0.0064844377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009815544,0.00069499394,0.0006302008,0.0019505073,0.025446665,0.007087974,0.005396635,0.0094559165,0.00049729075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012968669,0.000012013301,0.0006957502,0.000030706808,0.0000067363326,0.00040254547,0.0059022526,0.00014820554,0.00022128076,0.9855057,0.0028266876,0.0042351843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094542534,0.000050378367,0.01342475,0.000861514,0.000059027105,0.0007547936,0.017525636,0.00071397057,0.000669462,0.52764124,0.43807328,0.00013135785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6405102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6253985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6405102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027471775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03145051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7232138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205354467","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006359","title":"The fiscal nullity doctrine in New Zealand","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Revenue; Political science; Fiscal year; Economics; Law; Public administration; Accounting","score_opus":0.019830691921551562,"score_gpt":0.3111477209807346,"score_spread":0.29131702905918305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205354467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09317466,0.0049071694,0.0016911597,0.022225142,0.00020749698,0.000067929795,0.0000829716,0.00001557207,0.8776279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895654,0.0045040343,0.0013621853,0.0066941897,0.00017794053,0.00012142466,0.000048909526,0.00004296427,0.0913943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514943,0.000740577,0.00030397277,0.0006386615,0.0018340964,0.0013332178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973201,0.0010092801,0.00046237808,0.00025825325,0.00060964795,0.00034035178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004433851,0.00031043642,0.00065484917,0.0015863389,0.009289874,0.013528845,0.0014000848,0.0045953705,0.0064844377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009815544,0.00069499394,0.0006302008,0.0019505073,0.025446665,0.007087974,0.005396635,0.0094559165,0.00049729075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012968669,0.000012013301,0.0006957502,0.000030706808,0.0000067363326,0.00040254547,0.0059022526,0.00014820554,0.00022128076,0.9855057,0.0028266876,0.0042351843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094542534,0.000050378367,0.01342475,0.000861514,0.000059027105,0.0007547936,0.017525636,0.00071397057,0.000669462,0.52764124,0.43807328,0.00013135785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6405102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6253985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6405102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027471775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03145051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7232138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238239505","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_2515","title":"Downward Closure Property","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Database Systems","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.028201048674158843,"score_gpt":0.2684694340353436,"score_spread":0.24026838536118478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238239505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033044633,0.0027917225,0.11239923,0.0043920227,0.0011733163,0.00011461172,0.001525787,0.0009973464,0.8733016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23067622,0.009700712,0.09052043,0.004825874,0.0032505216,0.000542339,0.006451956,0.0024542613,0.65157765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.00020536594,0.00012024707,0.000529371,0.0005912066,0.00014055303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841475,0.00054230104,0.00007604902,0.00045243805,0.00044617575,0.000068234425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013996683,0.00086121244,0.0010273658,0.0019701875,0.0023676541,0.0054829395,0.0013124775,0.0013917742,0.06597904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047873114,0.000591241,0.0012347603,0.0023611125,0.0030918194,0.011247339,0.0025563308,0.0045896485,0.020134931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001447856,0.000027624083,0.0000632172,0.00009385387,0.000006524735,0.000057897232,0.00019885167,0.00010964219,0.00061249634,0.91807246,0.038459018,0.042283908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012553678,0.000011187086,0.00012591848,0.000043995686,0.000013313125,0.00029580353,0.00006476,0.00039984958,0.0011976233,0.72789013,0.26993442,0.000010375235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015813976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013261997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06597904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018427364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001508168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22072184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244322878","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_1041","title":"Sacramento State","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Savoy Foundation; Menzies Foundation; Samuel H. Kress Foundation","keywords":"State (computer science); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03259441735316272,"score_gpt":0.2757141888251589,"score_spread":0.2431197714719962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244322878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035109688,0.0035863162,0.0003684845,0.003133149,0.0005936054,0.00002839107,0.0017877017,0.0002776781,0.98671365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019211007,0.0018272994,0.0006968219,0.0009921769,0.00015664406,0.000031490596,0.00079900544,0.00010773158,0.9761779],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963415,0.000025978663,0.000011901228,0.000114722534,0.00015349626,0.000059691094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997074,0.000065917375,0.000027501783,0.000052405965,0.00008273349,0.00006399358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002174596,0.00034498321,0.00025603597,0.0008202533,0.0032405714,0.0042313365,0.00074533897,0.0013087946,0.20802549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008224322,0.00044989918,0.00018891523,0.0009176998,0.0011025339,0.0013147666,0.0013791748,0.002142656,0.03203761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005802713,0.00004136379,0.0012581159,0.00015718014,0.000007119765,0.0002534956,0.00055673806,0.00013062356,0.0004535199,0.10088558,0.7736358,0.12256239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037338825,0.0000052996797,0.00085467263,0.00006773628,0.0000026072742,0.000040506704,0.00013432199,0.00002626755,0.00008008129,0.0011225501,0.9976579,0.000004319174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06202466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1959672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20802549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00279025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029696824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69591457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245541635","doi":"10.1353/tyr.2012.0016","title":"PROPERTY TAX ECLOGUE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Yale Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"KISS (TNC); Art; Sunset; Advertising; Art history; Physics; Computer science; Business; Astronomy","score_opus":0.0816120730166239,"score_gpt":0.3447492499448498,"score_spread":0.2631371769282259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245541635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013013757,0.0030213427,0.00018439969,0.008406533,0.0013550962,0.000065109714,0.0015793644,0.00020218937,0.9838845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00991612,0.0020469872,0.00016450122,0.0070958408,0.0002180156,0.000049581944,0.001065511,0.00007638062,0.9793672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993668,0.00004416514,0.000020897778,0.000111377405,0.00028913605,0.00016766769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994149,0.00007958232,0.000027025777,0.00005350512,0.0003219628,0.00010302843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044454352,0.00030552802,0.00026832471,0.0008938382,0.0026716057,0.003261079,0.0009171404,0.0033004126,0.29141393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024815742,0.00033370766,0.00032510466,0.00088485377,0.00050953106,0.002233337,0.0014377048,0.0035175353,0.08924416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009063371,0.000021418786,0.00037421705,0.00004519562,0.0000015257232,0.00007946888,0.00006714741,0.000016602455,0.000081874525,0.045436945,0.92282385,0.03104267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014539157,0.000002775102,0.0004724729,0.000023798664,4.1910124e-7,0.000027484153,0.00003691314,0.0000055485025,0.000022013757,0.0002616674,0.9991437,0.0000016364924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070821315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100788556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29141393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029346575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004862521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245611581","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v21i8.2589","title":"Fully Compensating Eminent Domain Sellers When Economic Development Is the Public Use","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Property (philosophy); Public domain; Property rights; Law and economics; Public use; Domain (mathematical analysis); Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02913044091216317,"score_gpt":0.2210257660880496,"score_spread":0.19189532517588645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245611581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16468531,0.0010771538,0.38022563,0.030914841,0.001136692,0.000773764,0.00025211787,0.00032667042,0.42060784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85677564,0.00037991256,0.0646849,0.004527264,0.0006301764,0.000532677,0.00008738196,0.00010611322,0.07227593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085134,0.0026514237,0.00061141315,0.0018986026,0.0025823505,0.00140496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877247,0.0044704136,0.0012274953,0.004512212,0.0014896618,0.0005755511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013000461,0.00038986743,0.0010354326,0.001065636,0.0022809457,0.0057156794,0.0026081223,0.007667195,0.009889031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027927281,0.00043921047,0.000895053,0.0006125759,0.0077223624,0.010052862,0.0056672175,0.0060725235,0.0020907233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038732793,0.000057905363,0.00086240325,0.000021395277,0.000010190829,0.00015375686,0.0008521987,0.00025007996,0.0007075814,0.9839596,0.0018335456,0.011252505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012863925,0.00016870556,0.0016594825,0.00012773536,0.000042801737,0.0004029894,0.0010061465,0.004967267,0.004778177,0.90081924,0.08583626,0.00006256887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011625926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001834914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013000461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014869453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048128213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06875384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254291465","doi":"10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb08797.x","title":"Court Finds Statute Constitutional","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Water Works Association","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Service (business); Political science; Constitutional court; Public administration; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.009350045559989325,"score_gpt":0.26118952392035877,"score_spread":0.25183947836036946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254291465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032393467,0.00063099404,0.0037366364,0.044769496,0.0013751817,0.000097137214,0.0007811192,0.00020927862,0.9160066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6437992,0.00080749614,0.0026153245,0.083564445,0.0013372338,0.00022487387,0.00089859,0.0001474164,0.2666054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398005,0.00056948065,0.00027099688,0.0010678461,0.0020474861,0.0020641447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955635,0.0025691972,0.00018722044,0.00039672307,0.001024622,0.0002587543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049094786,0.00038022347,0.0007873778,0.0013583642,0.008292814,0.009224031,0.0022406431,0.012540745,0.021698724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013399782,0.00056926266,0.00095333235,0.0014722337,0.0068702297,0.0031494205,0.0027124614,0.007864386,0.004626544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014826529,0.000022041335,0.0004689999,0.00001224027,0.000009141959,0.00030388642,0.0007573318,0.00012882352,0.00027872014,0.96270597,0.032515332,0.0027826454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013934744,0.00007794143,0.0024773388,0.0002634529,0.000091214235,0.0004765689,0.0028292297,0.0015185768,0.0013836876,0.35466883,0.6359952,0.00007865776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05544953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0947847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05544953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004409209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009999513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11025357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254455663","doi":"10.2307/3868143","title":"Enlibra Rising","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.021107170577860424,"score_gpt":0.2681918421883663,"score_spread":0.24708467161050585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254455663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030326867,0.0015700965,0.0010930122,0.0352451,0.0083918795,0.00012231625,0.0022573925,0.0015696099,0.9467179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004450145,0.000370693,0.0004526574,0.008104435,0.0003874669,0.000053635827,0.0008460267,0.0004716504,0.98486334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783117,0.00019263066,0.000055167086,0.00045493798,0.00083308667,0.00063296047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980236,0.00017063497,0.00006716086,0.00014495807,0.0006348298,0.000958729],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014653682,0.0007237528,0.00040297143,0.0012768443,0.0068152547,0.008227568,0.0012989091,0.00378074,0.55935794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041119144,0.0005145822,0.0006932443,0.00094406115,0.0013472909,0.0054933345,0.00605433,0.005270728,0.30161512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045485,0.00006216647,0.00046319253,0.000046082605,0.0000024187086,0.00018721713,0.00034113444,0.00001861515,0.00031500426,0.019414995,0.9435532,0.03555045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019409954,0.0000035503272,0.00015355813,0.000010572124,3.5783793e-7,0.000021427391,0.00008217955,0.0000080863165,0.000037001188,0.00031705695,0.99936205,0.0000021999856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010784287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039056193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55935794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032563382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051676356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6285224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255892564","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190860745.003.0005","title":"The Complexities of Land Reparations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Property (philosophy); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Communism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Rationality; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05079377325389911,"score_gpt":0.26211584697085216,"score_spread":0.21132207371695305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255892564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014984096,0.021068728,0.013288492,0.038129587,0.0009136823,0.000064617525,0.000047234225,0.000110326015,0.9113932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77195376,0.018402584,0.006353776,0.009710107,0.0023453662,0.00031174714,0.00008752187,0.00023777051,0.19059734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907224,0.004867622,0.00030434955,0.00090311514,0.0022925064,0.0009100482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953158,0.002890481,0.00026681484,0.00093656935,0.00046370795,0.00012666907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007430335,0.00048444117,0.00073616824,0.0014217076,0.00911303,0.012868938,0.0027800074,0.0071750097,0.00817329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009582705,0.0005945944,0.0008235627,0.0014859785,0.052376576,0.020628953,0.009313725,0.010649728,0.0017501093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001619793,0.000002671749,0.000013778092,0.000013552418,9.364867e-7,0.00004678861,0.0016767634,0.00010501296,0.000019531048,0.9940106,0.0018554513,0.0022531224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004823969,0.000010829767,0.000086590015,0.000193255,0.0000038219227,0.00015343158,0.0028598318,0.0003121791,0.00012809825,0.76971674,0.22651967,0.000010720708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003606599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028139264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012868938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075165126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040907343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054536402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310752064","doi":"10.30933/kpllr.2022.100.43","title":"Tax Improvement for Inmates for Public Utilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Public Land Law Association","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Double taxation; Value-added tax; Public service; Public economics; Tax reform; Income tax; Corporation; Economics; Finance; Market economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.03952354825622489,"score_gpt":0.27502564586966444,"score_spread":0.23550209761343954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310752064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1436514,0.0013397525,0.0027944017,0.016927337,0.0025300474,0.00095874706,0.002738412,0.0012479508,0.8278119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20041892,0.0009947168,0.0018413785,0.004176252,0.00047458787,0.000292326,0.0014678638,0.00011485322,0.7902192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999073,0.000117326155,0.00004754812,0.0000717552,0.00021809105,0.00047231064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987049,0.00010962351,0.00016319857,0.00021478187,0.00053276675,0.00027465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010567729,0.00037771513,0.00021519652,0.0009700319,0.004343559,0.0013079765,0.0007751103,0.0012561914,0.053770017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023871604,0.00023408227,0.0003583114,0.000754534,0.000460307,0.0009466237,0.0013534513,0.0015611106,0.013048315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019761607,0.0005928988,0.028665151,0.00013879054,0.000015425276,0.00082186377,0.0018303841,0.00028127476,0.0022578216,0.061094943,0.76542246,0.13868132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028385015,0.00013370163,0.041505877,0.00008647802,0.000016271393,0.0004471511,0.0017905791,0.00049478334,0.0013779214,0.0010261904,0.9530682,0.000024403345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023549667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049977995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053770017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001734147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006884299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17987865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310752256","doi":"10.30933/kpllr.2022.100.43.","title":"Tax Improvement for Inmates for Public Utilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Public Land Law Association","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Double taxation; Value-added tax; Public service; Public economics; Corporation; Income tax; Tax reform; Economics; Finance; Economic policy; Market economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.03952354825622489,"score_gpt":0.27502564586966444,"score_spread":0.23550209761343954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310752256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1436514,0.0013397525,0.0027944017,0.016927337,0.0025300474,0.00095874706,0.002738412,0.0012479508,0.8278119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20041892,0.0009947168,0.0018413785,0.004176252,0.00047458787,0.000292326,0.0014678638,0.00011485322,0.7902192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999073,0.000117326155,0.00004754812,0.0000717552,0.00021809105,0.00047231064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987049,0.00010962351,0.00016319857,0.00021478187,0.00053276675,0.00027465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010567729,0.00037771513,0.00021519652,0.0009700319,0.004343559,0.0013079765,0.0007751103,0.0012561914,0.053770017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023871604,0.00023408227,0.0003583114,0.000754534,0.000460307,0.0009466237,0.0013534513,0.0015611106,0.013048315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019761607,0.0005928988,0.028665151,0.00013879054,0.000015425276,0.00082186377,0.0018303841,0.00028127476,0.0022578216,0.061094943,0.76542246,0.13868132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028385015,0.00013370163,0.041505877,0.00008647802,0.000016271393,0.0004471511,0.0017905791,0.00049478334,0.0013779214,0.0010261904,0.9530682,0.000024403345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023549667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049977995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053770017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001734147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006884299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17987865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311547278","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2020-0228-0952","title":"Canadian Youth Plaintiffs Appeal Ruling in Climate Change Case","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Climate change; Political science; Law; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.10014834677444384,"score_gpt":0.3009701489513435,"score_spread":0.20082180217689966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311547278","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004535438,0.00013242339,0.000032832526,0.00022459993,0.000027419705,0.000025448307,0.995374,0.00008534988,0.003644261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049049645,0.00043432994,0.00031237316,0.00032520722,0.000039477898,0.00020774969,0.9818495,0.00009681253,0.011829575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956507,0.0002734729,0.00030495683,0.00051555975,0.001987372,0.0012679745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97688204,0.0052665817,0.0021235915,0.0023750027,0.011537677,0.0018151191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030866428,0.0019617109,0.0017747662,0.012630763,0.0056364164,0.006266219,0.0056214966,0.0036328956,0.11293207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023898527,0.0012342393,0.0023003444,0.02141179,0.0010829458,0.0017113611,0.0026981463,0.004083485,0.033707198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041907057,0.000021961236,0.0025920996,0.0002904918,0.000025742145,0.000027535554,0.00004896666,0.00030302242,0.000010814643,0.0012072675,0.9934564,0.0019737687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031600086,0.000014406765,0.047168903,0.00083294295,0.00013587644,0.00006327918,0.00046558215,0.0011805134,0.00024837657,0.0015541223,0.9479404,0.000079553865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97373223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98445636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11293207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027185716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06311005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3777954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313787401","doi":"10.1353/rss.2021.0004","title":"Frank Russell: A Whole From The Parts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Sister; Adventure; Art history; TUTOR; Brother; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Classics","score_opus":0.0493520615747589,"score_gpt":0.3094114939375226,"score_spread":0.2600594323627637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313787401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031078786,0.2509278,0.0053643202,0.20963193,0.020590136,0.000039102146,0.00021549212,0.00067183207,0.50945157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08743636,0.067736186,0.007896317,0.064064145,0.005009669,0.000062560925,0.00028006398,0.0011803318,0.76633435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981516,0.00045401073,0.00006909353,0.0002558813,0.0008359428,0.0002334766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895966,0.0002321138,0.00006597432,0.000102816644,0.0003167217,0.00032265476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001468691,0.00066118495,0.00049803645,0.0009541161,0.0041367724,0.008892162,0.00072706235,0.002622143,0.027369037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043500536,0.0004933157,0.00025062368,0.00090897933,0.0043916716,0.010351857,0.0038021186,0.0036936793,0.012643395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018614663,0.000009631975,0.00010616328,0.00009318033,0.0000035880817,0.00013734725,0.0048765186,0.000024655623,0.00020218891,0.096545614,0.8249364,0.07304606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0067705e-7,0.0000018976427,0.00006921488,0.000095419935,8.8608346e-7,0.00009371385,0.001019731,0.00000646234,0.000031180283,0.0051868134,0.9934907,0.0000033363544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0114481915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019172618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027369037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030152677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053197164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091558576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313816677","doi":"10.1017/aju.2022.70","title":"Law as Infrastructure of Colonial Space: Sketches from Turtle Island","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJIL Unbound","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Colonialism; Law; Context (archaeology); Metaphor; Sociology; Constitution; Common law; Political science; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016350212775211294,"score_gpt":0.29079012684629413,"score_spread":0.2744399140710828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313816677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19080384,0.013625629,0.012184925,0.014137647,0.00027691256,0.00018242959,0.00013559991,0.00018056751,0.7684725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96335,0.004774534,0.0033568223,0.0005926386,0.000078901016,0.000113508184,0.00004744947,0.00007654032,0.027609559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996099,0.00023115646,0.000010154592,0.00003330655,0.000048849306,0.00006663366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993818,0.00043639974,0.00004295926,0.000044219578,0.000031909512,0.00006261561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004921228,0.0005180108,0.00024023229,0.0014192064,0.0057853763,0.0053670392,0.0009668496,0.0015333878,0.0055730524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012739695,0.00036368592,0.00033790307,0.0014510578,0.025747556,0.0043775938,0.0032089222,0.0028718424,0.00045696905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016896214,0.00002143865,0.0010040314,0.00014252978,0.000005870342,0.0019192325,0.19811332,0.0008216503,0.00037989064,0.78317094,0.0037560216,0.010648168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020740634,0.00009008229,0.012007019,0.00083950354,0.000031226045,0.0024351962,0.1921811,0.0024833423,0.0003522827,0.19999275,0.58951634,0.00005043342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06466298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1004454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067969584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002185879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12857324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361003617","doi":"10.5040/9781350348837.ch-003","title":"An Explication of Common Ownership and Common Territory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Academic eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Common ownership; Business; Genealogy; History; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.07527752712469221,"score_gpt":0.3314673150299591,"score_spread":0.25618978790526686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361003617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039414912,0.0030185746,0.06931335,0.024850817,0.00058111595,0.00010021645,0.00007822049,0.00007710824,0.86256576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322985,0.0011500611,0.007597451,0.0016852955,0.00019778604,0.00015278721,0.00006172102,0.00007546224,0.05678093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605066,0.0020894797,0.00010591027,0.0005318314,0.0006296944,0.0005924984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982158,0.001007886,0.00015036555,0.00030237768,0.00018246919,0.00014115126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031364392,0.00048089144,0.00056121446,0.0010504323,0.0056566354,0.007932258,0.0019458372,0.0035715336,0.005975731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032340782,0.00035157197,0.00088753004,0.001634198,0.048269942,0.014235863,0.007777044,0.004341364,0.00058701937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.408807e-7,0.0000014976588,0.000025108457,0.000004255388,4.4750118e-7,0.000018587658,0.0019935686,0.000047350048,0.000013050516,0.9971263,0.00033811652,0.00043086178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007788362,0.000011353451,0.00015608131,0.0000767935,0.0000039934034,0.00008025716,0.0052122925,0.0008630919,0.00009276527,0.908236,0.085253276,0.00000633347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007164766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059807324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007932258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005103032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035574853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037025273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809627","doi":"10.1353/rss.2000.0015","title":"The CCNY Affair","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Skepticism; Law; Spanish Civil War; Sociology; Political science; Classics; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.03331147691442319,"score_gpt":0.3107589695205214,"score_spread":0.2774474926060982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012701264,0.004387202,0.00019147551,0.065421,0.01268078,0.000028781114,0.00021442665,0.00011603901,0.91569024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011160869,0.0010862593,0.00008607104,0.024466198,0.0022381677,0.000016290518,0.00012811663,0.00012492546,0.9606931],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980782,0.00024687123,0.00003508599,0.0002003471,0.000990661,0.00044879003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986527,0.00017410515,0.00006921502,0.00012383827,0.0006018218,0.0003783222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011913611,0.0004699595,0.0003015297,0.0006871121,0.0075954427,0.008488702,0.000708421,0.006125283,0.23961733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004794933,0.000282581,0.0002790188,0.0008149116,0.0022096469,0.0029423581,0.003177748,0.005488603,0.07679562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006201357,0.0000050450244,0.00012060085,0.000010766096,7.8721644e-7,0.000033154163,0.000118143296,0.0000061299506,0.000050449456,0.017337,0.9759033,0.0064083496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.816114e-7,0.0000010505643,0.00012961644,0.000012350413,3.075834e-7,0.000013077545,0.00010534949,0.0000063303737,0.000019213196,0.00038841256,0.99932194,0.0000018261894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04418422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07700691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23961733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041348063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004609454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80159986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379230824","doi":"10.4324/9781003080916-4","title":"Riro Whenua Atu, Hoki Whenua Mai","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.06566606853348417,"score_gpt":0.2919825923616699,"score_spread":0.22631652382818573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379230824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032614734,0.013950407,0.0008389032,0.0020902245,0.0014983647,0.00007604108,0.00013550384,0.00011602711,0.9486798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08779279,0.006577968,0.0012317997,0.0004920151,0.00012731612,0.00006801885,0.00010356266,0.000083176936,0.9035233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990606,0.000013532847,0.0000035279015,0.000019809515,0.000026767277,0.000030195648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99990785,0.000023559673,0.0000102237045,0.0000065072395,0.000029315006,0.000022468623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001566401,0.00034978354,0.0002553787,0.0005278964,0.0038597542,0.002146073,0.00033601918,0.0005635072,0.04118631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045174602,0.00024450774,0.0001664903,0.0008919312,0.0009777253,0.0014797865,0.0009491651,0.001325247,0.006797857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000278928,0.0001581858,0.009953245,0.0016438285,0.000037405065,0.005317924,0.064446636,0.00034097236,0.016649816,0.22321154,0.21054128,0.4674203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043554296,0.00003278535,0.004659294,0.00022193274,0.000010281374,0.00090751244,0.008154195,0.00011164143,0.00080425,0.0021404715,0.9829433,0.000010048369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025993073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04118631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001649034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001628072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13778192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380228169","doi":"10.1515/9780228003076-013","title":"Creating the Bird Commission: How the Canadian State Addressed Japanese Canadians' Calls for Fair Compensation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); Telecommunications; Political science; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.041465886683178015,"score_gpt":0.2324951978737663,"score_spread":0.19102931119058827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380228169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038959894,0.0054750843,0.002111577,0.1402936,0.0023881379,0.00011336462,0.00015404388,0.00010429872,0.8104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48196763,0.0032059392,0.0028356009,0.034432445,0.0002242206,0.000073540985,0.00007313735,0.00016161182,0.47702593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785393,0.0002589196,0.000020722488,0.00014522328,0.0005686746,0.0011524919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984571,0.00031992758,0.00004081216,0.000038921295,0.0006457681,0.0004974847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002528302,0.00041821122,0.00022736333,0.00119802,0.032339975,0.013490627,0.0015824911,0.007314395,0.01120748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005106166,0.00045499872,0.0003989715,0.001799191,0.012304675,0.0040626028,0.003318648,0.0075815814,0.00068341347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025977783,0.000020689697,0.0015887687,0.000061752944,0.000010191156,0.00045523586,0.058602493,0.00040555792,0.0003900313,0.6156679,0.29825872,0.024512641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014346967,0.000010726227,0.0026308172,0.00012892646,0.000025654213,0.000050146475,0.044664305,0.00028955992,0.0002191712,0.015610595,0.93629336,0.00006255714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98937184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10301866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10301866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20277189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7474562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380239017","doi":"10.1515/9780773588684-005","title":"Federal Property in Newfoundland and Labrador","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0229878097381822,"score_gpt":0.22200194657476144,"score_spread":0.19901413683657923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380239017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17821082,0.020090446,0.00040315816,0.018112872,0.00049964554,0.00005213715,0.0020223262,0.000104704435,0.7805039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45304245,0.004268046,0.00043432758,0.002837036,0.000075944416,0.00005163774,0.0006080715,0.000049535323,0.538633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997841,0.0001526093,0.000053239186,0.00017922977,0.00030962014,0.0014642223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989324,0.00024672627,0.00014682974,0.00009302747,0.00022357475,0.00035744047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090851606,0.00027580795,0.00045138702,0.0023687175,0.010578242,0.008580912,0.0015825499,0.002072553,0.01849169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002372948,0.0005915355,0.00047381254,0.00430355,0.0047677997,0.0021715858,0.0032496206,0.0030088956,0.0013091018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024822043,0.00017340598,0.024713546,0.00019815279,0.00009600904,0.0018034731,0.0156825,0.0015202502,0.0006610046,0.6610687,0.20639284,0.087441914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032973094,0.000036240253,0.14125648,0.0004974807,0.00005374854,0.00019436945,0.012678935,0.00040588458,0.00044542726,0.008122481,0.8361976,0.00007840537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9683101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99367464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09166014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09166014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04289688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66504395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381294627","doi":"10.37419/jpl.v9.i4.8","title":"Opus as the Core of Property","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Journal of Property Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Property (philosophy); Natural (archaeology); Tangible property; Law and economics; Function (biology); Factoring; Core (optical fiber); Property rights; Abandonment (legal); Property law; Sociology; Natural law; Epistemology; Intellectual property; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Business; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.08200422804584546,"score_gpt":0.33331888027108325,"score_spread":0.2513146522252378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381294627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02128891,0.004476479,0.05062009,0.01888111,0.00037678677,0.000045693534,0.00007769441,0.00012637257,0.90410686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91020477,0.0026300244,0.010588643,0.0035082079,0.00055631914,0.00015844937,0.00007043491,0.0001584811,0.07212467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802077,0.0006294788,0.00007223369,0.0004031816,0.00048630757,0.00038805668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985044,0.00057850964,0.00012184444,0.0004497241,0.0001959824,0.00014953657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027099447,0.00032915836,0.0004559959,0.0014796532,0.0047199344,0.007493485,0.001414447,0.0032971513,0.008858007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004136713,0.00029652848,0.00062623894,0.0009565559,0.035743166,0.015605733,0.0067842524,0.004347882,0.0013162424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.129175e-7,9.73364e-7,0.000015086583,0.0000027923743,2.510188e-7,0.000006094338,0.0001834682,0.000022624694,0.000009829279,0.99886465,0.0002174838,0.0006759722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016526482,0.0000032790817,0.00004517391,0.000021167822,0.0000012720075,0.000019659412,0.00018432792,0.00021683311,0.000054693806,0.97741914,0.022030763,0.0000020086438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033296992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002135583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008858007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038397487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003039206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029632926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080605","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1452","title":"When Should Publicly Owned Land Be Considered Private in Homeless Encampment Cases? A Critique of Recent Developments in BC","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Covenant; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Interlocutory; Sociology","score_opus":0.13780281839369996,"score_gpt":0.3922041117613699,"score_spread":0.2544012933676699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046933122,0.009464229,0.008289416,0.719829,0.0017206694,0.00006155168,0.00013866903,0.00005129355,0.21351196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8370415,0.00360967,0.0033030524,0.13412112,0.0022423773,0.00010902853,0.000076452765,0.00010040167,0.019396296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97471493,0.007872199,0.0012420284,0.0037668252,0.008354274,0.004049718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96564275,0.020485101,0.0015483676,0.0022162902,0.007976796,0.0021306528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019445669,0.00037760212,0.00087889953,0.0029478315,0.014642092,0.020440727,0.0059006102,0.01806186,0.003762367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053649504,0.0006529344,0.0005725635,0.002986568,0.054375764,0.013797214,0.0069716154,0.027390974,0.0006278322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134099355,0.000018986613,0.00060537405,0.000048435766,0.0000055932014,0.00009581277,0.006520872,0.00013992116,0.000071850496,0.96883607,0.01436238,0.009281282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053480322,0.000034321212,0.00409542,0.00133834,0.000039084636,0.00022267025,0.013972408,0.0016347688,0.00071514264,0.6693597,0.30845168,0.00008288576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33583543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3659072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66416454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04213089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02898963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6677613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598954","doi":"10.59962/9780774860628-004","title":"Regulating Natural Resources in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Natural resource; Geography; Biology; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0138112993064078,"score_gpt":0.17739166343713617,"score_spread":0.16358036413072838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016840212,0.021722978,0.0007263646,0.035086405,0.0007700087,0.00009673499,0.0008361164,0.000085459396,0.9238357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13119851,0.01063451,0.0012051557,0.0071845884,0.00008474164,0.000055474473,0.00021941209,0.000053450214,0.8493641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986083,0.000087550434,0.000025537061,0.00011531326,0.0006239581,0.0005393769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927443,0.00008543594,0.000020066058,0.000031169657,0.00041973434,0.00016914269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007666109,0.00044208675,0.00036520316,0.0019549765,0.013119241,0.0071657696,0.001359942,0.0028458866,0.017643621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016115522,0.00054380903,0.00039357127,0.0031437445,0.0036488823,0.0011668258,0.0016811994,0.003513847,0.0010281232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028612296,0.00004737911,0.0021307552,0.00014657706,0.000016995476,0.00032501854,0.003488856,0.0015317834,0.0005356036,0.60929596,0.32158768,0.060864672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009486229,0.000005458919,0.0033771934,0.00014019839,0.000010927521,0.000034636432,0.0015568779,0.00041663516,0.00019526738,0.010580768,0.9836451,0.000027459579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11848785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11848785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24631841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8596935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391790274","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4697544","title":"Leases Over Real Property","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Real property; Business; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016871513039700508,"score_gpt":0.30020178905702743,"score_spread":0.2833302760173269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391790274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09484019,0.0009449121,0.00557323,0.0037357886,0.00012622953,0.000062557556,0.00056575035,0.00015278785,0.8939985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7761094,0.00043001174,0.00063851994,0.0007645626,0.00012881377,0.000043150623,0.0002489995,0.000049086684,0.22158743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673504,0.0007522655,0.00020556246,0.0004950822,0.0010826983,0.0007293057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462694,0.0020606245,0.0007359747,0.001353688,0.00092845794,0.00029431144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022272863,0.00028057562,0.00035593403,0.0013505239,0.0022456269,0.008077828,0.0013085508,0.002811138,0.05210127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010250198,0.0003000786,0.00040334003,0.0013104117,0.0026344527,0.0048426907,0.0022316077,0.0028639024,0.0073590195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001291193,0.000069507594,0.0018896017,0.0000493129,0.00002182503,0.0004681137,0.0013927589,0.0006925137,0.0010285286,0.9620165,0.013240966,0.019001216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010805425,0.00022236597,0.009132795,0.00030218632,0.000060731498,0.0013561761,0.0036929874,0.0058712484,0.0043530627,0.4751847,0.49962002,0.000095763724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00854236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034685968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002148983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17429608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392816027","doi":"10.29173/jaed329","title":"Guest Editors’ Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.009564481922806583,"score_gpt":0.2750108577097149,"score_spread":0.26544637578690833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392816027","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012345075,0.004507304,0.00028853063,0.035004497,0.94621396,0.000050733026,0.00032403774,0.0001796487,0.013307789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001962099,0.008006146,0.00053001154,0.029942716,0.8310076,0.000115525894,0.0004996817,0.00033745053,0.12759887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967957,0.0003491926,0.00032277178,0.00058351684,0.0015469408,0.00040191668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975556,0.0036757118,0.0013722779,0.0009405439,0.013144056,0.005311436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040939543,0.0019313754,0.0015837627,0.00361245,0.00284812,0.008463071,0.0027459657,0.0041267443,0.16384389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025046682,0.00063674594,0.0013487886,0.0019326104,0.0011437241,0.004621266,0.00366496,0.0061892495,0.08540548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009960144,0.0000060476054,0.00003695698,0.00008096663,0.0000013950888,0.000031464322,0.000024162871,0.000013932601,0.0000472244,0.0003181371,0.99191344,0.007516362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055263095,0.000012387882,0.00015678287,0.0001273337,0.0000030224492,0.00007723105,0.00005662066,0.000023415012,0.0000465056,0.00033489143,0.99914885,0.0000075946837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020197548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044438313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16384389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023662176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00355054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5481124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393380642","doi":"10.33002/enrlaw-09/c9","title":"Indian and Canadian Laws on Biofertilizers: An Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biofertilizer; Fertilizer; Biotechnology; Business; Law; Political science; Agronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.03484657482675155,"score_gpt":0.287161796701994,"score_spread":0.25231522187524247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393380642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022943141,0.00815691,0.0004223721,0.0101992,0.0001526715,0.000065815606,0.0009866538,0.00004419485,0.9570291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6472136,0.041831277,0.0030620433,0.010416041,0.00015289336,0.00017688038,0.002093459,0.0001434485,0.29491028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943462,0.00026640447,0.00009250857,0.00024454016,0.0035937366,0.0014566479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960408,0.0009801479,0.00023698494,0.00009550288,0.002272876,0.00037365296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015241411,0.00047693212,0.0002935628,0.009878167,0.013569295,0.0069454564,0.0021103865,0.001525583,0.011986789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043126806,0.0003201322,0.0005928789,0.022558112,0.005690732,0.0018733641,0.0020979294,0.0029087882,0.0007965591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017164599,0.000033312986,0.003022003,0.0002641473,0.00000758015,0.0003021857,0.019878073,0.00020763729,0.00024804028,0.8898669,0.055778235,0.030374717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005834027,0.000012437297,0.027498139,0.0006651016,0.0000593669,0.0002514147,0.028604532,0.0004329721,0.00031461683,0.0117587885,0.93034464,0.00005203681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9828167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98847187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1298948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1298948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12049786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393937230","doi":"10.12907/978-3-593-45764-2","title":"Relating to Landed Property","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Campus Verlag eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Cambridge; Université Laval; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Oxford; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Property (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030312808324913825,"score_gpt":0.2839905182228353,"score_spread":0.25367770989792143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393937230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019087754,0.009172631,0.003324804,0.0075262603,0.00036306557,0.000011854015,0.00003071743,0.000027722715,0.9604552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7501398,0.01007189,0.0015572098,0.002409766,0.00037807677,0.000029677525,0.00005514644,0.000052052903,0.23530641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991105,0.00037553388,0.000025543253,0.000120673045,0.00025989595,0.00010793535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995472,0.00023913055,0.000037407877,0.00008384071,0.00006048214,0.000031875894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006579045,0.00019246739,0.00020931993,0.0008481119,0.0034189813,0.00436191,0.0005574227,0.0011763003,0.007419139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015729421,0.000115414965,0.00020263926,0.0011935533,0.018770492,0.00501235,0.0025888889,0.0020120323,0.00078616245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023371977,0.0000035015632,0.000119456316,0.000021851256,9.31391e-7,0.00006625194,0.010991691,0.00006143036,0.00009575271,0.9766773,0.0048295152,0.0071299444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002248261,0.00001576872,0.0007841532,0.00030896263,0.0000033730992,0.000241177,0.014490457,0.00017073132,0.00022815741,0.27832067,0.7054271,0.0000072152748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049768263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009237459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007419139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033781263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017000125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024819493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394896775","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4762778","title":"The Duty of Directors to Link Executive Compensation to Climate Change: Lessons From Europe","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Duty; Business; Compensation (psychology); Climate change; Accounting; Executive summary; Political science; Psychology; Corporate governance; Law; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.036306066487298075,"score_gpt":0.3294973662459688,"score_spread":0.29319129975867075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394896775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17233871,0.01337651,0.007135301,0.23599732,0.0015279913,0.00005613754,0.00016461972,0.00006626621,0.56933725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95192015,0.002141386,0.00084188336,0.02838186,0.0005289082,0.00003047502,0.000040273473,0.000037839345,0.0160772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285674,0.0025338011,0.00034403507,0.0010184478,0.0010198216,0.0022271683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98533684,0.008296702,0.001360188,0.0015681556,0.0022692133,0.0011688754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018225731,0.00027729053,0.00059589895,0.0017803962,0.0052691884,0.011888252,0.0018263594,0.012415294,0.0072258296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03149338,0.00029823385,0.00070091017,0.0017879801,0.014753698,0.008357482,0.004955925,0.0068717524,0.00058626395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094349445,0.000077393175,0.0073673194,0.00006206783,0.000051152107,0.0002605067,0.0038939905,0.0012614658,0.00015127119,0.9434587,0.014878719,0.02844322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018261612,0.00010241883,0.027097914,0.0012186333,0.00010662272,0.00028554953,0.008644582,0.0014289184,0.00091578934,0.6735664,0.28631297,0.00013756158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03552357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027456447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03552357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045235762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008385832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09638804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394976835","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-56560-1_4","title":"Plantations and Chartered Companies: Land for Exploitation or God’s Gift?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Management; Commerce; Economics","score_opus":0.10372874830981209,"score_gpt":0.3327889269428323,"score_spread":0.2290601786330202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394976835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011283634,0.010148025,0.0021591343,0.028910438,0.0005503556,0.000012337406,0.000030116084,0.000022976708,0.9468829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68142176,0.0046067275,0.0012204432,0.00979871,0.0009183077,0.00004918451,0.000051239538,0.000041733758,0.30189186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928814,0.0003192669,0.00001394571,0.00009793284,0.00013833087,0.0001424477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942076,0.0003241911,0.00005374252,0.00007362943,0.000057916983,0.00006976986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011267784,0.00028981638,0.00034976908,0.0005467487,0.0030196155,0.0069996514,0.0010229192,0.0057598175,0.013053095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019888624,0.00020608619,0.00017685337,0.000963378,0.021457009,0.008001643,0.0019042367,0.004641337,0.0009334045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014568727,0.0000044156163,0.000020265727,0.000003244103,4.0665046e-7,0.000011469951,0.0005703863,0.000012889225,0.0000127162175,0.99303895,0.004416133,0.0019076583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012643238,0.00000888709,0.00039552854,0.00008880173,0.0000026743369,0.000099603,0.002102418,0.00018641914,0.00009878756,0.7698678,0.22712918,0.0000072278685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009003187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022008173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013053095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003855966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002644218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04366696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031282","doi":"10.29173/alr2753","title":"Tending Gardens, Ploughing Fields, and the Unexamined Drift to Constructive Takings at Common Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plough; Constructive; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Archaeology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.027103725892721014,"score_gpt":0.3109536792797493,"score_spread":0.2838499533870283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30460256,0.02002875,0.008721017,0.18046547,0.0005740432,0.000101460406,0.00017359543,0.00010585264,0.48522726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94720197,0.0024799062,0.0015281042,0.017855078,0.00010664209,0.000019570489,0.000027033351,0.000020520612,0.03076122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215806,0.0010399634,0.00020580528,0.0010228911,0.003341048,0.0022323353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938455,0.0027946103,0.00065773947,0.00045689623,0.00158497,0.0006602565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006382025,0.00028009826,0.00037303453,0.0014019596,0.0117270695,0.009274956,0.0022971379,0.0065059215,0.0021361813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007714642,0.0003530064,0.0004864805,0.0017272859,0.06520191,0.0036731476,0.004286976,0.0069929264,0.00013408385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060888956,0.000011814285,0.0009850194,0.000030366766,0.000004071371,0.0001723845,0.005102582,0.00016741175,0.00019665856,0.9817914,0.0034856985,0.008046488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008335239,0.000103886574,0.02900515,0.00090871664,0.000071929804,0.00062531023,0.025686793,0.00091787725,0.0019926564,0.45398524,0.48644722,0.00017191561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93931586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048335027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087482005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35069686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031296","doi":"10.29173/alr2756","title":"Bruce Ziff's Property Pedagogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056339498397736,"score_gpt":0.3750849449950613,"score_spread":0.3187454465973253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010731785,0.099739976,0.006193545,0.27869782,0.0025916672,0.000027009384,0.000056408575,0.00008046083,0.60188127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6025459,0.105709784,0.005090902,0.062465906,0.001763004,0.000106045685,0.00007689433,0.000109786226,0.22213183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779874,0.0007682666,0.000051465922,0.00022793704,0.0008660625,0.00028745958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986154,0.0008770776,0.000061793144,0.000058213278,0.00025743537,0.0001300625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015761025,0.00023081242,0.00031073668,0.0011400909,0.004270959,0.0037461289,0.00070610107,0.0029817033,0.004731422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042340998,0.00019860717,0.00016869392,0.0010849201,0.010181862,0.002992913,0.0017360912,0.00447993,0.00084141357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078350495,0.000022973807,0.0003312672,0.00008638333,0.0000024235005,0.000073539595,0.0036575836,0.00016908455,0.00018984434,0.83532286,0.119627476,0.040508673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000595948,0.000012627438,0.00087098836,0.00041672456,0.000002928167,0.00011659214,0.0012409015,0.00013342837,0.00020102192,0.103734314,0.89325625,0.000008370124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07636272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060605597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07636272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010224277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067672892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15183651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031496","doi":"10.29173/alr2766","title":"The Regulation and Litigation of Cumulative Effects on Indigenous Rights Following the Yahey Decision and Blueberry River First Nation Settlement and the Potential Effects on the Energy Industry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Settlement (finance); Energy law; Energy (signal processing); Law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Law and economics; Environmental law; Finance; Politics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Ecology","score_opus":0.016702501358749955,"score_gpt":0.27211397449988617,"score_spread":0.2554114731411362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16894078,0.005285134,0.004029443,0.10064531,0.00069940934,0.00010982648,0.00022776288,0.000059983526,0.72000223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8399899,0.0016377701,0.0018977643,0.027787555,0.00025606554,0.00008186586,0.00006914477,0.000027837523,0.12825213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886053,0.0015681556,0.00030672105,0.0013527652,0.004760321,0.0034066325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989422,0.00635846,0.0005038816,0.00063666725,0.002349564,0.0007294603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008723713,0.0003121563,0.00038757123,0.0011505252,0.014989156,0.009464196,0.0032777896,0.012514624,0.004183273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013758034,0.0005020603,0.0007681319,0.001148284,0.01965646,0.0030894747,0.0047952356,0.012423925,0.0003146233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000202975,0.000023142811,0.002414679,0.00004271502,0.000018598734,0.0011506415,0.009223607,0.0004949985,0.0007214676,0.9561533,0.021246972,0.008489616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013230191,0.00015415603,0.03531542,0.0014895693,0.00032769435,0.0011570862,0.032221567,0.0029419765,0.005267173,0.21577314,0.704773,0.00044694883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8482677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9349128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15173233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037223086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06810276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30525178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401967587","doi":"10.1111/josp.12587","title":"Property as power: A theory of representation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit Utrecht; University of Oxford; Queen's University Belfast; University of Southampton","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Representation (politics); Power (physics); Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Physics; Law; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.050320617727215904,"score_gpt":0.3463816251676915,"score_spread":0.2960610074404756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401967587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016612813,0.0062196422,0.2255175,0.029641805,0.0006895607,0.000119364515,0.0002555354,0.00015302608,0.72079074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90678793,0.0040458487,0.032825146,0.0038455322,0.0015180436,0.00035595777,0.00024165261,0.00017748895,0.050202478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509937,0.0026878405,0.00015901019,0.0007118014,0.0008503571,0.0004917694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651176,0.001885716,0.00032815628,0.000625134,0.00041910872,0.00023020478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036770676,0.0007513583,0.00070553366,0.0021728976,0.004492394,0.0115389405,0.0026843539,0.004774903,0.011207976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005241705,0.00040976843,0.0015233438,0.0024265978,0.03329276,0.019686837,0.005480483,0.0050399974,0.0018299451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013413458,0.0000017101418,0.000019221581,0.0000041947596,7.0912034e-7,0.0000074306995,0.00027257894,0.000073293486,0.0000071064733,0.99867934,0.00031009933,0.0006229566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051586494,0.0000041567296,0.000031193227,0.00002002751,0.0000023057355,0.000026687037,0.00017484878,0.00076535187,0.000022524211,0.9848979,0.014046824,0.0000030838505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034675668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001738467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115389405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054931776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039856017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807700","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.11","title":"The Liberal Case for Community Land Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Université François-Rabelais; Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04959892804806369,"score_gpt":0.3373374258143671,"score_spread":0.2877384977663034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3293795,0.0008668714,0.020444416,0.0732403,0.00033108945,0.000118694574,0.00007541953,0.000078890254,0.5754648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211067,0.000044831933,0.00032769117,0.0010785974,0.000037624748,0.000015482334,0.00000511524,0.0000053382482,0.0063746558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908179,0.003501925,0.0001992985,0.00090078375,0.0016773504,0.002902752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880574,0.0035174706,0.0010873845,0.0016064824,0.0023995826,0.003331786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070329793,0.00015166598,0.00030906027,0.00076592265,0.008708584,0.008455004,0.0011184908,0.0057666483,0.0066682836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016603172,0.0002974802,0.00033919295,0.000604763,0.023494374,0.005129176,0.0071046078,0.005573135,0.0004987638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061994315,0.000010522182,0.0004247658,0.000004803148,0.0000019375643,0.000111804475,0.0012985851,0.00014769314,0.000054452317,0.9951953,0.0014553337,0.0012886308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006457332,0.000055306915,0.0018699091,0.0001445354,0.000016189337,0.00031246693,0.0070702033,0.0036424533,0.00043445083,0.8629683,0.12337147,0.000050116578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035122484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038695678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035122484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008564698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008180745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06983608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404315336","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.011","title":"Conclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03217145450384357,"score_gpt":0.23703616670379857,"score_spread":0.204864712199955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404315336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004049214,0.002083065,0.0053838175,0.043532353,0.005310681,0.00014068664,0.0017310438,0.00042589338,0.93734324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07093805,0.0025851817,0.005491547,0.031956777,0.0013679725,0.00021808468,0.003455262,0.0005489779,0.8834381],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974722,0.00036331723,0.000094887975,0.0005953747,0.0009546753,0.00051943545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974298,0.00032675776,0.00010265633,0.0003076366,0.0013852436,0.0004479327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002304896,0.0005987313,0.00038965253,0.0012287374,0.0034093119,0.006622817,0.0018031603,0.003441908,0.22070363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076909987,0.00022810484,0.0007549713,0.0010698207,0.0015387163,0.0042985594,0.0036333827,0.0034498395,0.08549654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009852643,0.000058326117,0.0019201164,0.00029081435,0.00001589737,0.00027481295,0.0018686408,0.00024208288,0.00036347014,0.34861848,0.5456315,0.10061729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067460387,0.0000090443455,0.0006696545,0.0001784603,0.000004779394,0.000080958525,0.00089069334,0.00006340554,0.00019179529,0.017795539,0.9801031,0.0000059280787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008602228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009239885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7792964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048938137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054869214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330638","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.008","title":"Homelessness, Public Property, and the State’s Fiduciary Duties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Duty","score_opus":0.03094965021768141,"score_gpt":0.21443945692942282,"score_spread":0.18348980671174142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029655382,0.015645405,0.0062595853,0.020194964,0.00036229807,0.00002766403,0.000035507397,0.000044442066,0.9277747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87218225,0.008362825,0.0018526897,0.0036753118,0.0004662308,0.000068253525,0.00004984048,0.000037988448,0.11330467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991992,0.0002949372,0.000027758611,0.00008581575,0.00022736666,0.00016495875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995795,0.00021602385,0.000052367086,0.00006000556,0.000048581707,0.00004352345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009367277,0.00020719822,0.00020746292,0.0007620989,0.0035268755,0.0043911207,0.0005996513,0.0018029355,0.005298267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014326989,0.00015475511,0.00023711495,0.0010115544,0.02180455,0.0035124612,0.0028974477,0.0035464412,0.0005615127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.680628e-7,0.0000036443862,0.000036495076,0.000005625952,2.9099488e-7,0.00001614463,0.0013717465,0.00003275693,0.00001837895,0.9942517,0.001421847,0.0028405162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005985307,0.000015002154,0.00078323076,0.00017730557,0.0000030520785,0.00018743443,0.00305805,0.00026258122,0.00017489478,0.75148124,0.24384217,0.00000913718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008640877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008968007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008640877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048245084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035004377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404901702","doi":"10.15396/afres2024-025","title":"Legal Foundations of REITs: Lessons for Developing REIT Markets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Makerere University Business School; Government of Canada","keywords":"Real estate investment trust; Business; Computer science; Financial economics; Financial system; Economics; Finance; Real estate","score_opus":0.08817678977434054,"score_gpt":0.40123193869098794,"score_spread":0.31305514891664743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404901702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5860637,0.0033895944,0.039851498,0.026489148,0.000070125636,0.00029157833,0.0001463569,0.00005082086,0.34364715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234664,0.0006876308,0.0037113295,0.00018784916,0.000008925898,0.000035488774,0.000020963693,0.000012142508,0.002989076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490094,0.0031581733,0.00028371965,0.0003643314,0.0004148564,0.0008779696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97981524,0.012880139,0.0028246676,0.0012937464,0.0021058575,0.0010803338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882127,0.00020440729,0.00033838276,0.0015615039,0.0031852394,0.0083755525,0.0013707842,0.0015776791,0.008402196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023191525,0.00034788932,0.00032235566,0.0018856316,0.012413242,0.014284646,0.0036163311,0.0026902566,0.00034332814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008595995,0.000047982572,0.0038904306,0.00007270908,0.0000032007315,0.00045030343,0.011260587,0.0008833409,0.00019128398,0.970072,0.0005122008,0.012607382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029742077,0.00009558433,0.030611705,0.0016226657,0.00001622155,0.0005947224,0.1732481,0.007072375,0.0014406091,0.68176335,0.10342402,0.00008083732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011565893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017548302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011565893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076332036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008118685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055383086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405217431","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6726","title":"Compensatory justice and accountability for First Nations peoples: the Timber Creek case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting auditing & accountability journal/Accounting, auditing & accountability journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Redress; Sociology; Originality; Economic Justice; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.030353856583384856,"score_gpt":0.3281378735954766,"score_spread":0.29778401701209173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405217431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8503735,0.0008254243,0.0021165004,0.022791516,0.00015498011,0.000074040065,0.000015848831,0.000013519647,0.12363463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931179,0.00013575642,0.00031545566,0.001180035,0.00004005768,0.00003088906,0.0000028208067,0.0000038071073,0.0051733595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872207,0.0068463096,0.00032647685,0.00085045147,0.0020270888,0.0027289025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98612636,0.008952314,0.0013841754,0.0008826853,0.0011770513,0.0014773572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011606275,0.00022077911,0.00034889881,0.0008743973,0.025472226,0.0075518563,0.001334507,0.0052489606,0.003474851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021604465,0.00023075606,0.0002683472,0.0010483789,0.021946432,0.0035780168,0.0068764305,0.005730975,0.0001735607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045006276,0.00008275254,0.01665148,0.000076020595,0.00001405942,0.013407844,0.39562628,0.0003677108,0.0006921454,0.5568081,0.0039824597,0.012246191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049053142,0.00016764332,0.03400361,0.0010291919,0.00005932409,0.0062942524,0.63781214,0.0022775205,0.002039972,0.13963132,0.1764676,0.00016841554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0630075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12808783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0630075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009952522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010558332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12528151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405292328","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5022683","title":"Geographic Segment Disclosures and Proprietary Costs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.008905398448310892,"score_gpt":0.2659573945841178,"score_spread":0.2570519961358069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405292328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7047071,0.0035248273,0.005685477,0.012537363,0.00009958558,0.00008237013,0.0017165402,0.00006800842,0.2715788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882747,0.00065719767,0.00037371076,0.00021925158,0.00009779435,0.0000145876875,0.00019166552,0.000010722273,0.010160421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996869,0.0009263275,0.00030143856,0.00028433377,0.0010621967,0.0005566757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90624577,0.06268734,0.022369497,0.0034252843,0.0040161787,0.001255831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028697771,0.00018014201,0.0003449951,0.0025661038,0.0013150201,0.0056263423,0.0008213452,0.0020727818,0.024686068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055885956,0.00023128207,0.00027761352,0.0045582224,0.001845497,0.00614723,0.0016911437,0.001675065,0.0008618605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035757385,0.00021334265,0.13677347,0.00015726086,0.00012039339,0.0006574626,0.002875522,0.004508333,0.00043740813,0.7767077,0.01400662,0.06318496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012690462,0.00017010744,0.17342888,0.00040081202,0.0003876983,0.0012238886,0.008717183,0.011525584,0.0019555204,0.74896884,0.052992065,0.00010245588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061929105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008037608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024686068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023326755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019788963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08258313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405365478","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5019893","title":"Environmental Remediation Obligations in Bankruptcy: The Uncertainty that Remains After Qualex","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Environmental remediation; Business; Environmental science; Actuarial science; Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Finance; Contamination","score_opus":0.01796665691708621,"score_gpt":0.2798121048501247,"score_spread":0.2618454479330385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405365478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32233322,0.0088092135,0.07452139,0.20593753,0.00073029223,0.000087027955,0.00071240077,0.00016054972,0.38670835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99124825,0.0006857265,0.0011930316,0.0025516213,0.0003179159,0.000025438425,0.000035525914,0.00002283145,0.003919642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993745,0.0022998648,0.0004027239,0.0011123377,0.0014054368,0.0010345858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551236,0.031981427,0.005334768,0.0025591222,0.0036242648,0.0013768574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014919512,0.0003686912,0.0011771758,0.00140952,0.0034685126,0.011658685,0.001713899,0.011657096,0.007643078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05485664,0.00040943042,0.00051274785,0.0012216298,0.012859425,0.016697302,0.0036585026,0.008262087,0.0004578961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037314694,0.00003165589,0.0015122386,0.00002526221,0.0000138142495,0.00017025451,0.0007256679,0.002584668,0.00010928768,0.9837136,0.0038632352,0.007212991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005599857,0.000009826893,0.00092982565,0.000055535955,0.0000049038754,0.000023660587,0.00044857786,0.0022982152,0.00009125932,0.9920421,0.0040751467,0.00001541582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081456555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007792362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014919512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005613464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005848757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07890284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406445511","doi":"10.1016/s0967-0653(97)86442-3","title":"10.1016/s0967-0653(97)86442-3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Value (mathematics); Population; Accounting; Business; Fishery; Biology; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Sociology; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.014934215061390118,"score_gpt":0.21555906349392837,"score_spread":0.20062484843253825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406445511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032636098,0.00035944863,0.0004574553,0.0003570155,0.00022638639,0.00008545652,0.0005292143,0.0005750237,0.9970836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049019215,0.00018089675,0.00024845687,0.00018153308,0.000045727742,0.00004722382,0.00024371331,0.00011247356,0.9984498],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992274,0.00006060128,0.00006882557,0.00027949663,0.0002121532,0.00015154375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780184,0.0006099407,0.00015709305,0.00027996852,0.0005238857,0.0006272313],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012197805,0.0027497225,0.0019220638,0.003003479,0.0027848897,0.005070134,0.0033171868,0.007020815,0.9898915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018916962,0.0011013624,0.0015420002,0.002929146,0.0023935076,0.0065557444,0.0036271974,0.0029877708,0.99287766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029686006,0.0002039663,0.0008825939,0.0006430531,0.00003770515,0.00023816804,0.00014903919,0.0003922666,0.0015992658,0.007864431,0.38956288,0.5981298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041701136,0.00009862655,0.00056984206,0.0004014019,0.000014056126,0.0002787824,0.00013917968,0.0001634058,0.0002338964,0.0007053067,0.9973321,0.000021756148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046070786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042265975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010108471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013918085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014388058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014418423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411431470","doi":"10.1002/iir.1572","title":"Miljön i konkurs [The environment in bankruptcy] (1st edition). By Edited by JonatanSchytzer, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB. 2025. pp. 394. SEK 800. ISBN: 978‐91‐39‐03050‐8","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.022394549101532123,"score_gpt":0.3099314220758118,"score_spread":0.2875368729742797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411431470","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024302282,0.9598984,0.0004972732,0.0043205824,0.0048196567,0.000014573457,0.00040216566,0.000110901114,0.029693399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00898617,0.8759965,0.0014687164,0.0024756575,0.0048345453,0.00009560671,0.0010504955,0.00015130547,0.10494102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992617,0.00015781997,0.00008919083,0.00009004711,0.00032447441,0.00007670157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991997,0.00029555341,0.00018740012,0.000046038476,0.00019941088,0.00007199723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011706823,0.002128354,0.0017356375,0.0037395605,0.001068824,0.0058174604,0.0011368998,0.0026113894,0.048653223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002310563,0.0010488085,0.0008323967,0.0041512023,0.0015243066,0.00389659,0.0019426293,0.0028273168,0.02271255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028654018,0.000026858108,0.00016825955,0.0011797935,0.000020230764,0.00006324843,0.00027007787,0.00024898187,0.00015597926,0.010960377,0.8333855,0.15349191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064428064,0.000013761297,0.0009283859,0.0020904348,0.000008709197,0.00013633368,0.00015741523,0.00006268488,0.000049258404,0.005386546,0.99115,0.000010077547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008965935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016752493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048653223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020867684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043053995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16276121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411585679","doi":"10.29173/alr2837","title":"The Coherence of Constructive Takings: A Response to Peter Wills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.01507975426649442,"score_gpt":0.3288493343012665,"score_spread":0.31376958003477207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411585679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029642598,0.008513624,0.00069795,0.9708638,0.0016192576,0.000008725523,0.000014693397,0.000012886317,0.015304902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26902106,0.012470702,0.0020367699,0.6822345,0.011900241,0.000079940924,0.000026256992,0.00007978928,0.022150759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755308,0.011816683,0.00071714085,0.0029963583,0.0071313647,0.0018075671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542401,0.038217314,0.0012843377,0.00084094325,0.00403729,0.001380191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022695608,0.0006373904,0.001048259,0.0017373702,0.013671411,0.011859265,0.0030370466,0.023947032,0.0029809137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03781275,0.00066162966,0.0007306983,0.0024160726,0.065749794,0.011528905,0.0066047506,0.024772832,0.00059955695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017226721,0.000011522846,0.00013694195,0.00005309783,0.0000063573693,0.00017691532,0.01114384,0.00010648768,0.00007835236,0.8582205,0.12567395,0.0043747537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003738367,0.000023980761,0.00050445437,0.0003687847,0.000011430053,0.00014318523,0.009874313,0.00025165238,0.00028631242,0.33838895,0.6500428,0.00006673366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062376853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06856068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062376853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018295152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01931794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13274127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412269918","doi":"","title":"The Rush of Green:the Poseidon Principles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Gold rush; Rush hour; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.12063769403493116,"score_gpt":0.3262653927136905,"score_spread":0.20562769867875932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412269918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027100034,0.0061959266,0.022980135,0.06878754,0.0010287418,0.000044239914,0.00006466156,0.000058219743,0.87374043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85726243,0.0030376955,0.010467159,0.023304434,0.00081969996,0.00010872586,0.000041367333,0.00012860283,0.10482983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952828,0.0014830834,0.00014721912,0.0007921185,0.0018063219,0.00048845843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982253,0.0008900062,0.00017967091,0.00026182382,0.000260428,0.00018273178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062826667,0.00032166892,0.00036667273,0.0008215878,0.0040996545,0.00762468,0.0008255855,0.005005271,0.0042961943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063630785,0.00026283707,0.00042252662,0.0006913616,0.0286391,0.0057027214,0.0039588297,0.006628112,0.0005964311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023197167,0.0000023144464,0.00003719293,0.000005307768,5.093531e-7,0.000011247953,0.00041424573,0.000044906763,0.000032184296,0.99653697,0.0015750692,0.0013377763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011395276,0.000022223207,0.00040537945,0.00014009634,0.0000037772656,0.00010406044,0.00081958406,0.00029270514,0.00036742102,0.8154163,0.18239295,0.000024082376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064205965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008785622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00762468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044313665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055346033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03322637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413592234","doi":"10.64628/aa.6kcrrh9eh","title":"In NSW there have been significant wins for First Nations land rights. But unprocessed claims still outnumber the successes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Land rights; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.0423542689473227,"score_gpt":0.3238848270846744,"score_spread":0.2815305581373517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413592234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4568117,0.004369235,0.0047189468,0.028403351,0.000982382,0.00011149319,0.0008717457,0.00015084997,0.50358033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8078079,0.0013281709,0.0034200738,0.0025888383,0.00015012911,0.000038279508,0.00035979363,0.00010272988,0.18420401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644995,0.00049985305,0.00008477027,0.00024748483,0.0016260453,0.0010917783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99203545,0.0025381406,0.00079695974,0.0007479885,0.0023070518,0.0015744702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004330883,0.00023089562,0.00037197807,0.0013048148,0.005089266,0.0069454364,0.00079304905,0.001277492,0.02434264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091987075,0.0002810216,0.00032610047,0.00144212,0.0035851898,0.0031800054,0.0055669886,0.0027110905,0.002954048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004043664,0.000278339,0.09942537,0.0015769458,0.00018759754,0.0017200764,0.022982718,0.00061327027,0.011007956,0.5296628,0.08365015,0.24849048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029183098,0.00026046095,0.23929428,0.0007501204,0.000049351864,0.00051356474,0.021199271,0.0007851117,0.00533142,0.036354814,0.6953467,0.0000858139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07401862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37327647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07401862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007210802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009835251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14717561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416423329","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5771324","title":"Public Order and Capricious Wills in Quebec: Some Important Lessons for the Rest of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Common law; Charter; Public law; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Constitutional law; Private law; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.027165051720198185,"score_gpt":0.2887325695700466,"score_spread":0.26156751784984844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416423329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4178136,0.01659437,0.0014537544,0.23604847,0.0006903259,0.00015244278,0.0020702502,0.000081915234,0.3250949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111385,0.002926945,0.00063153286,0.010560014,0.00008976695,0.000032095366,0.00020591568,0.00004271739,0.074372575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579924,0.00043488908,0.000077427125,0.00029070154,0.0007418299,0.0026559466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99405223,0.0011359107,0.00034133787,0.00023114077,0.0026913416,0.001548055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026701335,0.00038768913,0.0009807528,0.0021326614,0.023425693,0.010901228,0.002593038,0.0041263388,0.016907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006822608,0.0003963798,0.0007911432,0.0047527296,0.00978116,0.003536266,0.0027041747,0.005100048,0.00047451674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002821417,0.00018451613,0.053523645,0.0002600089,0.00018021296,0.0018018974,0.033590432,0.002615209,0.0004673314,0.7124079,0.13539536,0.059291404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002204405,0.00008714533,0.20493875,0.001105934,0.0002561641,0.00037992492,0.10695836,0.004329725,0.0006553889,0.06522624,0.6153972,0.00044475627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99937123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21489093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21489093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2377808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91061527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416863721","doi":"10.33920/sel-04-2511-01","title":"Cadastral and Market Value of Agricultural Lands and Their Use in Establishing Land Payments and Allocating State and Municipal Lands to Agricultural Producers under Various Rights","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zemleustrojstvo, kadastr i monitoring zemel' (Land management, cadastre and land monitoring)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agricultural land; Leasehold estate; Land management; Land tenure; Agriculture; Cadastre; Revenue; Profit (economics); Land use","score_opus":0.015762982291660305,"score_gpt":0.2575882963549776,"score_spread":0.24182531406331728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416863721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63933325,0.0027966753,0.038705315,0.0012199822,0.00013396889,0.00023573825,0.006738168,0.00012571993,0.3107111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724398,0.0008291008,0.009191779,0.000048521393,0.00007586574,0.000045588804,0.0016466842,0.000023888932,0.015698923],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987953,0.0003396167,0.00006555651,0.00012496863,0.0005632039,0.000111354166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968034,0.0008195168,0.00086389703,0.00032459522,0.001048271,0.00014028385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021444112,0.00023397537,0.00017790045,0.004171702,0.000595158,0.0036970342,0.0006164417,0.00039860522,0.010054661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059108,0.00015634987,0.00020366258,0.005275928,0.0010898458,0.0032331652,0.0007221592,0.0002982239,0.0011104436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016328582,0.00033486026,0.20855412,0.0002920369,0.00006469745,0.0005900199,0.0021491065,0.02646227,0.003974538,0.3026349,0.0135688055,0.44121143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020241847,0.00026807308,0.6699854,0.00038134312,0.00007439295,0.0017936209,0.0064394046,0.05006866,0.0035946856,0.06613197,0.20114115,0.00010115047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010235222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029948208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010235222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025872728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010307943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033636153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417492141","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5938298","title":"Administrative Law Wrapped, 2025","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Charter; Administrative law; Supreme court; Nothing; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.042216360139646164,"score_gpt":0.35856112082626773,"score_spread":0.31634476068662154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417492141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00655052,0.0056420914,0.004106015,0.024049014,0.02841012,0.0001890037,0.01314087,0.0020130002,0.9158994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031812657,0.0011568166,0.0012982893,0.007945102,0.0036579357,0.00010716884,0.0036715274,0.0006650481,0.9496854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796224,0.00024185682,0.0001898825,0.00036707704,0.0009228404,0.00031609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983418,0.00051339203,0.00007910286,0.0004484988,0.00048310106,0.00013404925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205839,0.0006818541,0.00092652335,0.003614033,0.0027175173,0.012962007,0.0009342876,0.0074020997,0.16305129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009960691,0.00080807356,0.0011433527,0.0024793278,0.0017843244,0.0036361853,0.0022713102,0.0050082263,0.097350314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110206805,0.00003959428,0.00043561746,0.00012321443,0.00002922608,0.0001875128,0.00021910803,0.00021439196,0.00038072563,0.13780281,0.8205465,0.03991104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027439515,0.000015510825,0.0017606155,0.00019633706,0.00001654902,0.00010603961,0.00014539747,0.0003666396,0.00037924552,0.031041339,0.9659273,0.000017592081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014178896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015420475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16305129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005165486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033751735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54546094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54839640","doi":"10.29173/alr96","title":"Insurance Law Principles in an International Context: Compensating Losses Caused by Climate Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Context (archaeology); Subsidy; Liability; Loss and damage; Liability insurance; Business; State (computer science); Insurance law; Climate Finance; Economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Public economics; Political science; Law; General insurance; Finance; Economic growth; Developing country; Geography","score_opus":0.08042271661837308,"score_gpt":0.336927511584071,"score_spread":0.25650479496569795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54839640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024270345,0.010972826,0.0132797025,0.095505185,0.0011030277,0.000044143188,0.000105399005,0.00006999346,0.85464936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88664955,0.011017348,0.007428509,0.035450697,0.0018333428,0.000111009525,0.00013646347,0.00007579417,0.05729738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681985,0.0008151334,0.00013019715,0.00030842845,0.0011266007,0.0007996959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804914,0.0007854951,0.00022313265,0.00024406664,0.00053945323,0.00015882174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004492759,0.0003955433,0.00036189455,0.001588775,0.005045067,0.007953401,0.0014013748,0.0065627415,0.0033586738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057591707,0.00025622424,0.0008507866,0.0014037276,0.013998603,0.003944869,0.0032828504,0.008159736,0.00036926387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021235685,0.0000075983094,0.00030169016,0.000012484917,0.00000412968,0.00006295271,0.00055374624,0.0003324848,0.000078826924,0.9922857,0.0034701265,0.0028881633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002065813,0.000053906166,0.004452528,0.00056188984,0.00006062874,0.0003334045,0.002808293,0.0014416844,0.0006322771,0.57373035,0.4158435,0.000060870796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10219098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114866845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10219098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073398547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012424621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2031923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55165375","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1041","title":"Standard of Review from Decisions of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Rental housing; Renting; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07541170921499277,"score_gpt":0.3390322300614727,"score_spread":0.2636205208464799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55165375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047394875,0.53217083,0.0055468353,0.11922754,0.054251138,0.016930921,0.05337019,0.0010329675,0.21273008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052215964,0.55798084,0.017304813,0.07316703,0.013301163,0.031386256,0.055564113,0.0009708308,0.19810897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9257148,0.009642268,0.019144516,0.0032093157,0.03920318,0.0030859672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70777065,0.029206732,0.030689562,0.012848112,0.21387725,0.0056077912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040954236,0.0013339206,0.0044047046,0.021877635,0.0036878441,0.012428044,0.005942596,0.011111928,0.012897123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15725878,0.0018195638,0.0029038065,0.022329262,0.0024792042,0.00343989,0.003270255,0.0034592636,0.008929545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002770963,0.000047999627,0.0015514682,0.06303343,0.0002967071,0.00046121125,0.0007182385,0.00023830698,0.0012849692,0.005863475,0.8084508,0.117776245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083651685,0.000031303873,0.008577433,0.025640575,0.0002445627,0.00008940124,0.000099917175,0.00006903341,0.00037544416,0.00058308465,0.96416396,0.00004177591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14781925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29584727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8521807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037019398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09802266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29391772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W632841074","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1105","title":"Book Notes: The Meaning of Property: Freedom, Community, and the Legal Imagination, by Jedediah Purdy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016997465099213255,"score_gpt":0.2670843482335554,"score_spread":0.2500868831343422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W632841074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013172744,0.17913875,0.00241143,0.5375387,0.015963817,0.000026569645,0.0002860849,0.000072118404,0.26324525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05007622,0.14977908,0.0035574944,0.18644154,0.026331631,0.00016077796,0.00023088545,0.00024173272,0.5831807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994615,0.00020121818,0.000023533932,0.00009234993,0.00018663885,0.000034829423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968405,0.0025029536,0.00007569572,0.000092015565,0.00036519507,0.00012364089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011099586,0.000620506,0.00061311387,0.0013844966,0.0054460224,0.0068889624,0.001017205,0.004641368,0.018533813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039830795,0.00052749604,0.000246892,0.002151369,0.010544453,0.012290994,0.0017691136,0.008433684,0.004140306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007812127,0.000010698419,0.00006734452,0.000051270246,0.0000015678853,0.000023791456,0.0009577187,0.000045817265,0.000026110674,0.20722248,0.7839597,0.007625598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081021235,0.000006168028,0.00031383304,0.00023886762,0.0000026205644,0.00007304028,0.0021444724,0.00007410678,0.00007359939,0.10235952,0.89469343,0.00001224987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023246462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06385196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023246462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028444391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033500239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062001824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645547363","doi":"","title":"Property rights and duties of redistribution","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Routledge eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Property law; Private property; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.029667924724872872,"score_gpt":0.2531777157714968,"score_spread":0.2235097910466239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645547363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058145123,0.022590812,0.009789614,0.025734598,0.0007891139,0.00005615288,0.00020082881,0.000053223885,0.93497115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74577767,0.018495483,0.0075653414,0.011586724,0.0024976202,0.00036040272,0.00022919418,0.00013943073,0.21334806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362826,0.0024631554,0.0003529966,0.0010981864,0.0016388766,0.000818594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611217,0.0015590977,0.0003763344,0.00083341415,0.00087240734,0.0002466579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046416456,0.00063788117,0.00051469874,0.0020102628,0.0041179843,0.009104874,0.00095588405,0.0040186727,0.015845004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010448577,0.0004354593,0.00040921484,0.0019817378,0.02339703,0.009428154,0.0045048585,0.0042748074,0.0030910275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026535997,0.0000023481132,0.000039805647,0.0000074133313,9.117505e-7,0.000008236653,0.00037855218,0.000030919826,0.000018594257,0.99338114,0.0035241463,0.0026051565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090459625,0.000010832073,0.0003318791,0.00019478022,0.0000039607626,0.00007167478,0.0005286729,0.000109265035,0.00007883196,0.71156365,0.28708944,0.000007959924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007054948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004726713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015845004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056151035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044457344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053006828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889948326","doi":"10.34675/l12274","title":"Sale and transfer of mineral claims in British Columbia.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RoyaltyStat Library","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mineral; Payment; Transfer (computing); Production (economics)","score_opus":0.008004973072806893,"score_gpt":0.21249792401304962,"score_spread":0.20449295094024272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889948326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970965,0.0011725917,0.00011399651,0.0043364987,0.000040370796,0.000082938175,0.0027935647,0.000024536266,0.09433883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9007195,0.0005588455,0.00010298768,0.00054783083,0.000008372372,0.00001807272,0.0005417066,0.000010176973,0.09749254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907875,0.00007287073,0.00003302671,0.00007263677,0.0003317054,0.00041107912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787104,0.0005327579,0.00019201382,0.00008016962,0.0009118969,0.0004121436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051796396,0.0001142317,0.00017400576,0.0015302452,0.0055845417,0.0021166883,0.0012960063,0.0013996817,0.01410769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042676264,0.00021862444,0.00011674755,0.0026635006,0.0011514144,0.0006903243,0.0016360211,0.0018714694,0.0010285749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015609856,0.0010866048,0.51448196,0.00037067622,0.000116676114,0.0089477245,0.0377146,0.0019243475,0.0038663698,0.049572263,0.13951766,0.24084009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005933023,0.00010148217,0.8389677,0.00016241072,0.00005871937,0.0005234461,0.052459184,0.0020294543,0.0018265684,0.0020196107,0.10171951,0.00007255578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028109407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028109407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028761603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20394897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6891722915","doi":"10.4324/9780203712153-8/work-ownership-estair-van-wagner","title":"The Work of Ownership: Shaping Contestation in Ontario’s Aggregate Extraction Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Private property; Process (computing); Property (philosophy); Aggregate (composite); Property rights; Space (punctuation); Centrality; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.056614758229918107,"score_gpt":0.30946360291829605,"score_spread":0.2528488446883779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6891722915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36196607,0.00050329807,0.006631641,0.01431114,0.00007903516,0.000095532196,0.00008116377,0.000029566225,0.61630255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98473686,0.000103854894,0.00038008692,0.00027073995,0.000013141133,0.000025532127,0.000015472186,0.00001689287,0.014437365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882747,0.0034169266,0.00040021093,0.0012174193,0.0034663917,0.003224399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865421,0.008051376,0.0010839896,0.0011218009,0.0017182942,0.0014823759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010891309,0.00029385654,0.0005334815,0.0018424181,0.037084382,0.012724678,0.0022092147,0.0039944155,0.01020996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024797479,0.0005582942,0.0004810232,0.002659951,0.04267016,0.0073197773,0.012488829,0.0034216729,0.0004020287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045319062,0.00003135405,0.009843693,0.0000410192,0.000012068815,0.0008379891,0.33889404,0.0005940031,0.0004684888,0.6340946,0.003978885,0.011158488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072082374,0.000040039464,0.02260814,0.00029548223,0.000036009224,0.000312346,0.35882938,0.0027643123,0.0005099397,0.3152121,0.29922158,0.00009853583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67667013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32332987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055361394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04935867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.650468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904905063","doi":"10.14288/1.0226309","title":"Regulations for sale of lands in the provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Work (physics); Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.029992476110524465,"score_gpt":0.2909934445422567,"score_spread":0.2610009684317322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904905063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045114964,0.0019721761,0.0028577384,0.0146338595,0.0018668483,0.0021561973,0.040603,0.0010760202,0.8897192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04834489,0.0014078547,0.003926774,0.006688359,0.00010479903,0.0005350644,0.00854149,0.00017277747,0.930278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985025,0.000112254354,0.00006722231,0.00007391,0.0009240663,0.0003200886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961746,0.0006850201,0.00016494477,0.00016560218,0.0024826697,0.00032720977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012934807,0.0003727022,0.00024445483,0.0013217473,0.005412888,0.0018328173,0.0017845002,0.0017832223,0.06259103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024939147,0.00064702076,0.00025137965,0.0024604637,0.0014261792,0.00044234685,0.0006825306,0.0014215127,0.0107958615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012002334,0.00010959394,0.011502983,0.00018640992,0.00001253741,0.00059700373,0.002436667,0.0005792001,0.0045698555,0.019204503,0.9337219,0.026959373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045039425,0.000035859215,0.05856984,0.00018807726,0.000012951811,0.00009377403,0.0024247412,0.0002642032,0.00084153516,0.00079975417,0.9366564,0.00006778747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93700105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06299895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112745855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04209056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20938784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904916963","doi":"10.14288/1.0222240","title":"The land laws of British Columbia : together with Land Office forms &amp; regulations. 1873","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Land use; Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.02083974534412091,"score_gpt":0.2634785663686073,"score_spread":0.24263882102448636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904916963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013302275,0.0049292636,0.00090224744,0.017632574,0.0008662578,0.00021357641,0.019243015,0.0004059786,0.94250476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047204837,0.0018343459,0.0014568393,0.0028818185,0.00007404944,0.000116811294,0.0028297848,0.00011933101,0.9434821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803096,0.00012361536,0.00009387029,0.00013785767,0.0011880993,0.00042556803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645114,0.00043360348,0.00010551241,0.00021424978,0.0025389188,0.00025657998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008032489,0.00040666942,0.00037272065,0.0019790998,0.0073618214,0.0050875233,0.0014007984,0.0031851653,0.046698924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043285787,0.0006375059,0.00023727847,0.0058310614,0.002625802,0.0008837251,0.0010223751,0.0030344708,0.010183827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034562043,0.000041567426,0.0030558298,0.00011915532,0.000008419523,0.00016258529,0.0014820644,0.00025603906,0.00064674334,0.054280363,0.8993554,0.040557258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008069138,0.0000053224903,0.014916261,0.00013923291,0.000010520086,0.000035181343,0.0011370706,0.00017999875,0.0003579255,0.0022428983,0.9809303,0.00003723439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99463636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046698924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02820394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092889175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2046349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927317237","doi":"10.34675/l14223","title":"Exclusive option to acquire a l00% undivided right, title and interest in and to one mineral property claim located in Coleman Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RoyaltyStat Library","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Real property; Payment; Property law; Property rights; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03570393344660213,"score_gpt":0.263810183150917,"score_spread":0.22810624970431484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927317237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028401317,0.00015513205,0.001054409,0.0020758791,0.00007962455,0.00013845286,0.0017053324,0.00016649715,0.96622336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10901477,0.00009412674,0.00028105368,0.0007803657,0.00004238354,0.00006082875,0.0004925675,0.00002497569,0.889209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888295,0.00005449285,0.000032801916,0.000102185986,0.00053677725,0.00039082748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983291,0.00033475072,0.00009772266,0.00022218667,0.00054369855,0.00047254984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072486344,0.00026182312,0.0002748857,0.00081037654,0.0037917201,0.0021548725,0.0013277694,0.0017334644,0.18070695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021746485,0.00044131643,0.00030483902,0.0006340318,0.0013304314,0.0007077314,0.0020599,0.0012414597,0.03814886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001282914,0.0007386966,0.030156562,0.00023945585,0.00007073159,0.0035110044,0.00484214,0.00047530874,0.021472415,0.2086638,0.56678504,0.16176198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014633466,0.00014614346,0.028524673,0.0001121776,0.000037461865,0.0007361394,0.0009440829,0.0009506344,0.003742614,0.005285797,0.95931023,0.00006371214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.183213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47576454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.816787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031664395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010417577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60452497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927791270","doi":"10.34675/l3954","title":"Exclusive mineral rights option to acquire the entire right, title and interest in the Dalhousie Claim, which includes any mineral leases or other interests.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RoyaltyStat Library","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mineral; Mineral exploration; Mineral resource classification; Legislation","score_opus":0.03494180526358541,"score_gpt":0.2918006803904317,"score_spread":0.2568588751268463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927791270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063371025,0.00032065384,0.0018133201,0.0050729513,0.00033877036,0.00015587649,0.0012713681,0.0003169006,0.9843731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0554276,0.00023784177,0.0012281571,0.0011075271,0.00009256291,0.00006726405,0.0003402662,0.00007187149,0.94142693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791926,0.00010317274,0.000070618924,0.0002347362,0.0012993225,0.00037283165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996801,0.0005401033,0.00016779205,0.00066959416,0.001240686,0.0005807452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021625145,0.0004997436,0.00059751986,0.0019509837,0.0065543624,0.007704672,0.0014204673,0.00413604,0.28694624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057822275,0.0006972891,0.00065243087,0.0010237616,0.002938586,0.0031472654,0.0044481326,0.0038337782,0.06567441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039037442,0.00024566756,0.0027654977,0.00020859418,0.000044399563,0.00071244023,0.0016366665,0.0002809387,0.0068366155,0.5136397,0.39273643,0.080502704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005310194,0.000052331994,0.0025754278,0.00009839256,0.000021706312,0.00022945322,0.0005236754,0.0005417565,0.002951709,0.013198305,0.97970104,0.000053125397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07851599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16365764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28694624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00511444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02059047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9599308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6961129964","doi":"10.14288/1.0370684","title":"An Act for consolidating in one Act certain provisions usually inserted in Acts authorizing the taking of Lands for undertakings of a Public nature. Whereas It is expedient to establish certain conditions and provisions upon and in accordance with which Land required for undertakings or works of a public nature may be acquired and the manner of obtaining compensation for the same...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Legislation; Land consolidation; Legislature; Public use","score_opus":0.10019522564142866,"score_gpt":0.375484519187208,"score_spread":0.27528929354577936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6961129964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070774863,0.0014816116,0.0025288314,0.009499746,0.0016145718,0.00052173174,0.0011405714,0.00024754263,0.97588784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0633141,0.0010304494,0.003094959,0.009914627,0.00036480743,0.00039670765,0.0009379678,0.0002009915,0.9207454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247825,0.0010670227,0.0005225861,0.0007591577,0.0035393666,0.0016336293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928491,0.0012906023,0.0004677953,0.0009101337,0.0039005813,0.0005818676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030314862,0.0007414494,0.0005489581,0.0011468852,0.009532899,0.006114013,0.0015302452,0.006186718,0.034049865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095597785,0.0010412133,0.00046415132,0.0016703884,0.005617426,0.0026275557,0.0031489402,0.0089853825,0.017776802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006824968,0.00007977522,0.001417185,0.00012728691,0.000010978423,0.00024502835,0.006162277,0.00015285169,0.0019711622,0.36493838,0.6005223,0.024304524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018965506,0.000016817832,0.0033462096,0.00012641831,0.000010397374,0.00007041757,0.0007761136,0.00006295003,0.00045944922,0.0029811743,0.99209106,0.00004006831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3712459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.613205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3712459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010610115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036024954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979791231","doi":"","title":"After the Revolution: Being Pragmatic and Functional in Canada's Trial\\nCourts and Courts of Appeal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Standard of review; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01543662959929202,"score_gpt":0.22529111395517004,"score_spread":0.20985448435587803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979791231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19773635,0.017632423,0.016557792,0.315,0.00078474864,0.00025070715,0.00024308107,0.00012134312,0.45167357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639509,0.0020362968,0.0027450086,0.017723203,0.00014725036,0.00006624535,0.0000523906,0.00005135484,0.0132273445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568419,0.011775058,0.00086675945,0.0029278726,0.017915802,0.009672661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714541,0.0146145,0.0015398406,0.0015016191,0.00842909,0.0024608285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027712435,0.0003675631,0.0008226004,0.0041677835,0.03710328,0.030655578,0.003041027,0.007576829,0.0020136626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06570088,0.0007396269,0.0005632916,0.005813069,0.07325547,0.009478646,0.007619681,0.0114304405,0.00020911606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031503896,0.0000096102995,0.0013548379,0.000045140678,0.000013359793,0.00018347055,0.033937145,0.00024930373,0.00021582846,0.9290019,0.009672539,0.025285281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008738173,0.000047394045,0.02236338,0.00067320577,0.00009020868,0.00018820757,0.04758695,0.0013111831,0.00076014164,0.5173195,0.409382,0.00019037136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91911405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93608254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13860385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13860385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22315653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986631850","doi":"","title":"Property Rights and the Public Interest: Why <i>Annapolis Group v Halifax Regional Municipality</i> is Wrongly Decided","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; De facto; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Private property; Property rights; Property law; Certainty","score_opus":0.04301092555500766,"score_gpt":0.2925902481220232,"score_spread":0.24957932256701557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986631850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022797527,0.0060352255,0.00076002465,0.8310745,0.0009373298,0.000015156118,0.00009208422,0.00004601172,0.13824223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6647988,0.002490043,0.0007812808,0.27266398,0.0012263657,0.000052964475,0.0000863277,0.000084074345,0.05781611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948066,0.0014209063,0.000098405704,0.00070026657,0.0010717701,0.0019019722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948426,0.0023972914,0.00023857565,0.0002813978,0.0014399366,0.0008001742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005946493,0.00030677143,0.00032952728,0.0007446702,0.01131736,0.016569672,0.0021042828,0.019517465,0.00632042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008285484,0.00038628836,0.00063814904,0.0005234558,0.028965337,0.0074736206,0.0025793125,0.01611236,0.0012874294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018113966,0.00001855255,0.0011228297,0.00002730168,0.0000100568295,0.0003877416,0.004424206,0.00008008707,0.00022355681,0.8988578,0.08961624,0.005213567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095043004,0.00003759036,0.0072939335,0.00056384306,0.000051944746,0.00050187873,0.021316456,0.0006723601,0.0013478892,0.2804071,0.6875737,0.00013826262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5515822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5420809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44841778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031097747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022548068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9021172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989233867","doi":"","title":"Accounting for Risk: The Advent of Capped Conveyancing Title Insurance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conveyancing; Freehold; Insurance policy; Work (physics); Reinsurance; Casualty insurance","score_opus":0.022369508232320173,"score_gpt":0.24423726782908028,"score_spread":0.2218677595967601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989233867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25584784,0.041642968,0.1776656,0.102856904,0.0029414694,0.00040658822,0.0004725909,0.00084978715,0.41731632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93082386,0.008318068,0.040019482,0.0020688265,0.0012605874,0.000049275168,0.00014754586,0.00012983366,0.017182587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925524,0.0018575281,0.00028510753,0.00073592394,0.0039325203,0.0006364404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855714,0.005601444,0.002114838,0.002187819,0.003473064,0.0010514017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009954439,0.0006903296,0.0006022502,0.0016725567,0.0017593246,0.007817105,0.0023194288,0.0026428704,0.0044320896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031593386,0.000549148,0.0011424735,0.0012365987,0.0049837236,0.008606446,0.005447983,0.0070491843,0.00043091146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023772084,0.00019308478,0.027893053,0.00033405816,0.00010053502,0.0014905153,0.006792382,0.024796013,0.0021797928,0.6835258,0.01962107,0.23283605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006697105,0.00058623217,0.046316423,0.001675249,0.00018162723,0.0019291285,0.0033604854,0.15488406,0.0035423138,0.39014775,0.39687595,0.00043382365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06033317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036768105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06033317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008294979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063274074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119963944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989305868","doi":"","title":"1820, April 24, 03 Stat. 566, Act Making Further Provision for Sale of Public Land","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - CSUMB (California State University, Monterey Bay)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Public land; Public interest; Legislation; Public access; Public policy","score_opus":0.04347716119120237,"score_gpt":0.2582935779844333,"score_spread":0.21481641679323094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989305868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028651257,0.002433006,0.00087393017,0.0120172165,0.00188367,0.00029323847,0.02579501,0.00051351875,0.95332533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013069449,0.0010838669,0.0010023757,0.029678162,0.000661275,0.000830492,0.006635856,0.00016556536,0.94687295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721366,0.00025684023,0.00017671689,0.00030746727,0.0015517288,0.0004936388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980268,0.00042350203,0.00014086757,0.00013156825,0.0011337195,0.00014359294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002087563,0.0009801082,0.00052475464,0.0015361403,0.005007475,0.0038013128,0.0019210697,0.0076747346,0.06041907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007665472,0.0012903473,0.00076564355,0.001533141,0.001418872,0.0019288476,0.0016730012,0.0065247826,0.07446627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005247055,0.000064648426,0.0009109875,0.00007444614,0.0000058182745,0.00011439852,0.00028822912,0.000084494284,0.00046538742,0.029030064,0.9623306,0.006578458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054529275,0.000033420354,0.0076566823,0.0002558627,0.000014541216,0.00008259219,0.00024245509,0.00012204902,0.00027759917,0.003973729,0.9872585,0.000027995055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16262068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3352112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16262068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067027803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010264751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32334822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989372279","doi":"","title":"Are Royalty Agreements Required For\\nCanada East Coast Offshore Oil And Gas?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Submarine pipeline; Nova scotia; East coast; Production (economics); Petroleum industry; Oil production","score_opus":0.034309354716604026,"score_gpt":0.27658795397736163,"score_spread":0.24227859926075762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989372279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19269207,0.002542621,0.007516736,0.03528291,0.00045561732,0.000109657056,0.00026145318,0.00009459548,0.7610443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92515594,0.0010046384,0.0021308607,0.00577365,0.00015088003,0.00005355938,0.00009462419,0.000020643665,0.06561523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934407,0.00065893726,0.0003409563,0.0006546679,0.002432586,0.0024721285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153817,0.0026508982,0.0020822291,0.0009880769,0.0021573075,0.00058343454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045187217,0.00014101372,0.0002981059,0.00063102297,0.004813452,0.0065873815,0.0011293736,0.004910741,0.0063345255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014589364,0.00040330464,0.00031508252,0.00080782064,0.009571895,0.005329093,0.001942868,0.0043783025,0.001284225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133024805,0.00001718313,0.0020741187,0.000039363804,0.0000047744875,0.0002929981,0.00190213,0.00022651008,0.00043675472,0.9815042,0.0054735467,0.008015165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000785683,0.00010191695,0.042967677,0.0006391381,0.000052896812,0.001386069,0.011884721,0.00195419,0.003034768,0.3184862,0.6192457,0.00016822184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23124595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3084683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76875407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105286585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017538775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4597999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989482237","doi":"","title":"Avalanche trade Duchene to Senators, Predators get Turris","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Government (linguistics); Falling (accident)","score_opus":0.020700789096614183,"score_gpt":0.2811413796641602,"score_spread":0.26044059056754604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989482237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038360914,0.00055329234,0.000095849246,0.00479109,0.00071734184,0.000030315246,0.0008978552,0.00017944282,0.9888987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008650957,0.00029424572,0.000035467205,0.0006540983,0.000055643693,0.000011278708,0.00029383154,0.000091080685,0.9899132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996176,0.00002342202,0.000007433567,0.000048452523,0.00017103972,0.00013210185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990657,0.00007587923,0.00005221474,0.00005053654,0.0004447084,0.0003110461],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031243675,0.00044258244,0.00029740192,0.00087141345,0.007348355,0.004739879,0.0004482312,0.0015484352,0.3788139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013065502,0.00034364546,0.00022061542,0.0009456529,0.00109874,0.001769144,0.0019560189,0.0026920342,0.11234618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022024738,0.00002277634,0.001009073,0.000030414581,0.0000030851686,0.00015496614,0.0005279458,0.000016457252,0.0002509641,0.009388402,0.9775793,0.010994646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003770625,0.000007564693,0.0025529477,0.00003303038,0.0000019758008,0.000060624956,0.001113046,0.000017006898,0.00019427738,0.00036866244,0.9956418,0.000005324152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14710623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41189203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3788139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037132704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035229481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8860466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6993157405","doi":"","title":"Notes from the periphery: finding more than (non)ownership in property law?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Property (philosophy); Assertion; Indigenous; Public property; Property law; Private property; Property rights; Space (punctuation)","score_opus":0.04240599340427809,"score_gpt":0.2887694600608076,"score_spread":0.24636346665652953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6993157405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1250795,0.010579663,0.0131399855,0.14040253,0.0009295824,0.00002887259,0.000048747203,0.000074075004,0.70971704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529824,0.002721234,0.0014194973,0.007818353,0.00046922886,0.000022727436,0.00002322519,0.00007618588,0.034467053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974005,0.0013162496,0.000057195204,0.0004006496,0.0004767145,0.00034870044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966869,0.0019579544,0.00020559605,0.00048140186,0.00037935542,0.00028881148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036748392,0.00024462224,0.0003761994,0.0007474216,0.008530652,0.010718197,0.0010816236,0.002726512,0.008849367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006457365,0.00018260568,0.00021368678,0.0011095401,0.054793775,0.02159232,0.006356465,0.0067622624,0.0008831692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008938733,0.000008832437,0.00033879268,0.000023974002,0.0000012370847,0.00014896881,0.055799086,0.00002670884,0.00015719303,0.9289431,0.0057777073,0.008765397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131714705,0.000027641743,0.0019842272,0.0003895743,0.0000075174707,0.00029026938,0.102308564,0.0002712874,0.00038267908,0.6278152,0.2664895,0.00002040294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014419125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020841153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014419125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048778453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032779174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03539145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998565543","doi":"","title":"An analytical index to the act 20th Victoriae, cap. XLIV., amending the judicature acts of Lower Canada.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.007818340206857144,"score_gpt":0.21257976322630834,"score_spread":0.2047614230194512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998565543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034257162,0.039061688,0.0023953698,0.039800953,0.009324712,0.0004674379,0.0048664454,0.00023802572,0.9004197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028604677,0.010401289,0.002532179,0.023754915,0.0014475492,0.0003571735,0.0014647457,0.00024174529,0.93119574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937735,0.00044409063,0.00020573188,0.00031843476,0.003947623,0.0013105748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968829,0.0004926231,0.00018733274,0.0001014679,0.002113451,0.00022233058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019352833,0.0011604114,0.0006672677,0.005356481,0.014771619,0.006596371,0.0024372693,0.0054000043,0.019970158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00809213,0.0006798598,0.0006622703,0.007412421,0.005312636,0.0021614197,0.0021656682,0.006845642,0.005336706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001908165,0.000026876507,0.00038237762,0.00016080125,0.0000038559133,0.000088643734,0.0019941323,0.00012707319,0.00020971538,0.121343,0.85896313,0.01668132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004667045,0.000006218493,0.002894016,0.00025875436,0.000005074699,0.000033456556,0.00086203514,0.00009599951,0.00013912859,0.0061009596,0.98958033,0.000019499446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92841136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9725408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071588635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051388737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07930085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37285316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998890373","doi":"","title":"Beneficial Interests Under the Chattels Real Act","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.04495838495947105,"score_gpt":0.3094161888029288,"score_spread":0.26445780384345774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998890373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13621342,0.0029812052,0.0057980116,0.019079704,0.0002227527,0.00007453628,0.00015128855,0.000047956008,0.8354311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94052994,0.00053989765,0.0010681556,0.0031645873,0.000066210516,0.00006415256,0.000055009084,0.000012637824,0.0544994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994142,0.00173982,0.0001919247,0.00068732316,0.0013171765,0.00192189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953009,0.0022438176,0.0005854417,0.00051291205,0.00091424386,0.0004427038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035141292,0.00030723735,0.00030722245,0.0011282875,0.008764212,0.0065074163,0.0008527105,0.003045978,0.0040790155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055986736,0.00031021453,0.00030249864,0.0008278479,0.03272126,0.002236364,0.0037768665,0.0039966777,0.0003621377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014921348,0.0000062843424,0.0014094287,0.00001822122,0.0000045021825,0.00018548954,0.007357094,0.00030857266,0.00012951677,0.9830124,0.0033471503,0.0042063566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009092833,0.00013211738,0.043490525,0.0010717098,0.000119650664,0.0007923831,0.029951578,0.001963746,0.0016222557,0.23646058,0.68406695,0.00023749421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6536589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73192924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6536589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029399648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023951571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6967615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999174443","doi":"","title":"Biodiversity and Conservation : Cross-Border Legal and Regulatory Perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Corporate governance; Constitution; Wildlife; Environmental law; Biodiversity conservation; Subject (documents); Environmental governance","score_opus":0.018941158163848597,"score_gpt":0.2932666020930865,"score_spread":0.2743254439292379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999174443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01673635,0.12536214,0.010451578,0.21213801,0.0013011647,0.000046266163,0.00010310631,0.000055314555,0.6338061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.780133,0.11003343,0.012731148,0.05830855,0.0021813707,0.00017331028,0.00017111417,0.00008210899,0.036185995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925033,0.0027265637,0.0002694023,0.00069667614,0.001939708,0.001864403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940498,0.0036694475,0.00042410372,0.00031889652,0.0010261148,0.0005116743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091034025,0.00063549797,0.0009600624,0.006209034,0.011886577,0.030075999,0.002939704,0.011299931,0.008352753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062998733,0.0004650592,0.00087837764,0.008479841,0.04325131,0.016177086,0.010206381,0.008749205,0.00041203207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004312461,0.000022565531,0.00041811282,0.000072290175,0.000007067294,0.0001266457,0.002158924,0.00035790724,0.00006553527,0.9839654,0.0028282662,0.009972991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010730254,0.000040556926,0.0040132357,0.0022627506,0.000043069613,0.0003334832,0.02567414,0.0011083293,0.00027608592,0.60725856,0.35893804,0.00004102483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19920576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2343812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19920576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03027073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026978873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39609247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000298253","doi":"","title":"Federal Systems, Covenantal Theory and Common Property","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Politics; Individualism; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Political philosophy; Democracy; Liberal democracy","score_opus":0.00836400279717377,"score_gpt":0.1893230281063919,"score_spread":0.18095902530921812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000298253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015305643,0.009569581,0.016269824,0.027199129,0.0003339276,0.000034322744,0.00014865135,0.00010784964,0.931031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217642,0.0041279052,0.0045400616,0.0028633561,0.00051292666,0.00010548019,0.00019732621,0.00006569331,0.06582307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977428,0.0010032982,0.000050316703,0.00037922928,0.0003797968,0.00044460752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987117,0.0004850869,0.00016323813,0.00027070902,0.0002412807,0.00012797955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023969235,0.000352088,0.0003534861,0.002673812,0.008382229,0.0069422605,0.001164637,0.002805863,0.00963712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025244362,0.0002378293,0.00046839457,0.0029719777,0.021362482,0.0074941814,0.003001595,0.0033429214,0.0009715817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.009911e-7,0.0000010358359,0.000015018072,0.000001378298,2.4773297e-7,0.0000022637726,0.00006940525,0.00003645473,0.0000015366101,0.99859744,0.0008378773,0.00043680624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030269666,0.0000025499537,0.00016993808,0.000028888053,0.000001867195,0.000012654192,0.0001947222,0.00031679653,0.00002400991,0.9446698,0.054572616,0.0000032470523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043889716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029940382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043889716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013299424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067405603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096494496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001562921","doi":"","title":"La proprieta aborigena tra esclusivita e sovranita","year":2016,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Padua Research Archive (University of Padova)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domain name; Tacking; Domain (mathematical analysis)","score_opus":0.06406497584400998,"score_gpt":0.3196342033700237,"score_spread":0.2555692275260137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001562921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13211504,0.006381246,0.020095456,0.009884305,0.00022995366,0.00009873889,0.0003488853,0.00012007364,0.8307263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77046645,0.004844422,0.0074922047,0.00096111343,0.000106399515,0.000072816096,0.00015166079,0.000099388475,0.2158056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773633,0.00048217768,0.000055687076,0.00035934587,0.000722799,0.00064368796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773574,0.00039718588,0.00038340237,0.00033995695,0.0008744946,0.00026917545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018294357,0.00041283568,0.00036579833,0.0015525202,0.005072749,0.009342023,0.0012498081,0.0008739983,0.00963066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031575358,0.0002693389,0.00036080737,0.00205508,0.009211837,0.0021300085,0.00407087,0.0022409216,0.0011745078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022311066,0.000015414931,0.011483023,0.00014037227,0.0000147086785,0.00026304473,0.032256097,0.00023424729,0.00081413856,0.9107879,0.0045652855,0.039403472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009009332,0.00006308657,0.059178803,0.00059936556,0.00007230215,0.00065214327,0.033460937,0.0010212825,0.0016264996,0.07336126,0.8299039,0.000051451916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24464189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4995455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24464189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01204409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013254534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48643583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009238467","doi":"","title":"The Durability of Terra Nullius: Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.032411397525443746,"score_gpt":0.27433616918010056,"score_spread":0.2419247716546568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009238467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22179537,0.0026173228,0.00068787445,0.05506255,0.0004012746,0.000058160058,0.0002928992,0.000040060713,0.71904457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8427429,0.0008132703,0.00017239497,0.011060944,0.000046539786,0.00003342048,0.00006780837,0.000045715948,0.14501706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707866,0.00046956053,0.000079248624,0.00024724973,0.000674373,0.0014507995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972621,0.0011115468,0.0001319353,0.00014735089,0.00089442974,0.00045257603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033751477,0.000230374,0.0005050559,0.0009399828,0.027351717,0.009776053,0.00213221,0.0065388405,0.010346817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007432167,0.00038401101,0.00026717823,0.0013632014,0.010481091,0.0030841904,0.0043926304,0.011158947,0.0007185017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014236954,0.000041490814,0.010117295,0.00010220224,0.000024088684,0.0024326576,0.06989424,0.00022374047,0.00076166313,0.78584814,0.10783789,0.022574205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006458791,0.00006046712,0.029221907,0.0011058429,0.00021526308,0.00075017195,0.18627581,0.00095507334,0.0025482618,0.08898273,0.68959486,0.00022491666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9072155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97325337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092784524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03976985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045229428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2885518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009388294","doi":"","title":"Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick: Nav Canada v. Greater Fredericton Airport Authority Inc.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Liability; Context (archaeology); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.011634700686370913,"score_gpt":0.2117169023539463,"score_spread":0.2000822016675754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009388294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3484183,0.0055075344,0.0013718074,0.107421584,0.0010885759,0.0004951192,0.0006379564,0.0000727539,0.53498644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8709652,0.0013113427,0.0008161078,0.021675583,0.00009198469,0.00014331547,0.00012373857,0.000032306667,0.1048404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912548,0.0010697303,0.00039050507,0.00068486546,0.0024842783,0.0041157855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942053,0.0016204226,0.0003531548,0.00038319972,0.0026351805,0.00080273557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059567275,0.0003998585,0.00041380004,0.0010980509,0.027735427,0.010574374,0.0050308933,0.011171945,0.004892119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01515956,0.00072464935,0.00047402913,0.0029724538,0.013735808,0.0023569546,0.0033659423,0.012159878,0.00044586443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001260322,0.0001536455,0.007983268,0.00008605327,0.000030109233,0.0015127318,0.046360876,0.0011946562,0.0015697478,0.8586966,0.064482346,0.01780396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003058626,0.00012418095,0.07042617,0.00054623466,0.00019519737,0.00055075885,0.070363134,0.0023782414,0.0043332027,0.047552448,0.80277187,0.00045268598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99110985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16552651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16552651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2776326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96787095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010320016","doi":"","title":"How Has Dunsmuir Worked? A Legal- Empirical Analysis of Substantive Review of Administrative Decisions after Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick: Findings from the Federal Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Set (abstract data type); Judicial review; Focus (optics); Centrality; Standard of review","score_opus":0.0972193804624586,"score_gpt":0.35957383535376525,"score_spread":0.26235445489130665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010320016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8804269,0.009266308,0.0013339563,0.058300346,0.00017117201,0.00031127853,0.00028017498,0.0000305871,0.04987924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99237317,0.0009366398,0.00038333656,0.003658664,0.000043185246,0.00006312985,0.00004999253,0.000012720459,0.0024791374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9088542,0.032931708,0.0032242252,0.005665944,0.03200472,0.017319165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66620463,0.21604355,0.046740897,0.008260592,0.052984793,0.0097655635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.076754294,0.00019658805,0.0008537113,0.0064273383,0.015825728,0.0150628975,0.003327401,0.0040782853,0.0017173608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26650444,0.0005806247,0.0005705248,0.009699426,0.01627756,0.008123978,0.004213445,0.004510212,0.0002159974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004777205,0.00042195385,0.34093955,0.0006891444,0.000270739,0.0013248315,0.29244074,0.0016175879,0.00092216796,0.22777887,0.024457937,0.10865871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008808324,0.00036739698,0.6858518,0.0013768948,0.00017012397,0.0002523957,0.21185572,0.0013585013,0.0013643712,0.016093954,0.080906756,0.00031400262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8918827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93409234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8918827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12832555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14929691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9310714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010367632","doi":"","title":"An inconsistency in the Canadian law of adverse possession? Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Common law; High Court; Jurisprudence; Legal history","score_opus":0.07092524141209065,"score_gpt":0.32468545153167083,"score_spread":0.25376021011958017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010367632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1266151,0.0055369963,0.004441789,0.19975953,0.0007655077,0.00012283813,0.0012092199,0.00007129858,0.6614776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93116295,0.002467416,0.0016099941,0.029668882,0.00024858158,0.000056402467,0.00020812915,0.000037702655,0.034539975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99081343,0.0007139811,0.00033919353,0.00096904277,0.0046744538,0.002489783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912873,0.0023052765,0.0005105262,0.00057006703,0.004599795,0.0007271037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052201007,0.00034489576,0.00062190025,0.0015656174,0.017664079,0.00906526,0.003268159,0.006222407,0.0037741135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020706614,0.0005915426,0.0005973923,0.0031683529,0.01967858,0.0036450482,0.0024751918,0.008382633,0.0002981997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004123129,0.000010529024,0.0052678296,0.00004473946,0.000019424564,0.00041711284,0.007381275,0.0003342717,0.00019609419,0.9382119,0.0390268,0.009048874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017672918,0.0000443878,0.03964869,0.00096240203,0.00026809177,0.00061046734,0.02364983,0.0025113572,0.001278768,0.28944728,0.64096385,0.000438193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101811156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101811156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16586867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7386951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014248724","doi":"","title":"Ontario Hit With Lawsuit Challenging ‘Ag-Gag’ Legislation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Supreme court","score_opus":0.027129647101620386,"score_gpt":0.2593591559814583,"score_spread":0.23222950887983793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014248724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12704425,0.0014098833,0.0011748759,0.18170153,0.0014240526,0.00017634832,0.0009301508,0.00016862953,0.68597037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44696826,0.0017092123,0.0013775325,0.08482139,0.00038445086,0.000087342196,0.00037891377,0.00008673732,0.4641861],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952272,0.00024451327,0.00009032655,0.0002875583,0.002369076,0.0017812749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956695,0.00082049356,0.00016738211,0.00019049647,0.0019626752,0.001189475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002152408,0.00025137773,0.00024628427,0.0008338292,0.028194241,0.0057979757,0.001417553,0.0071192277,0.009216639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048433547,0.0005162843,0.00067466195,0.001193143,0.006581714,0.0012413705,0.0021369369,0.005855543,0.0008675754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010165064,0.0000802465,0.019681646,0.00011500021,0.00005016117,0.0038828496,0.028502269,0.00045173653,0.0023734898,0.311272,0.6125443,0.020944705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003722317,0.00003430546,0.027625678,0.00011085466,0.000052949108,0.00022894454,0.013381052,0.00047742086,0.0008264597,0.00629863,0.9508481,0.000078391146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082531594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082531594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13807322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5988114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017283238","doi":"","title":"Base Visit Book Niagara Falls International Airport ARS, 27 June 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Navy; Canadian Armed Forces","keywords":"International airport; Pacific islanders; Population; Base (topology); Race (biology)","score_opus":0.011677250577989046,"score_gpt":0.1878744961009461,"score_spread":0.17619724552295704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017283238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000093451294,0.0006189086,0.00011134061,0.00037404228,0.00045909156,0.000022709877,0.0011999195,0.000382099,0.9967384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00029691946,0.0003988198,0.000064912856,0.00011149994,0.000036204085,0.000006797092,0.00048991357,0.00007616074,0.9985189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998832,0.000007721926,0.0000045358074,0.000020592941,0.000067949084,0.000016003345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997383,0.000031397973,0.000009408635,0.00002628422,0.00013334425,0.00006124941],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017160819,0.0008679111,0.0005758184,0.0009910081,0.0017630217,0.0033543557,0.000868705,0.0011257838,0.73354477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073051377,0.00044079928,0.00029328922,0.0012256736,0.00023279423,0.001995531,0.0008576947,0.0014250448,0.6570113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062960708,0.000010112943,0.000043343112,0.00002970214,4.658066e-7,0.000012348806,0.000020221902,0.000017615046,0.000031604315,0.00096071855,0.9815595,0.017308105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017057678,0.000003919012,0.00017376238,0.00005306275,6.515828e-7,0.00001497339,0.000034905996,0.000015751051,0.00002052742,0.00021219495,0.99946696,0.0000016259112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015615433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07246882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98438454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010949173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013247763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38006604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018824347","doi":"","title":"Domesticating Guidance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Statute; Formality; Promulgation; Interpretation (philosophy); Notice; Scholarship; Scrutiny","score_opus":0.0192168237388043,"score_gpt":0.2866433128202807,"score_spread":0.2674264890814764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018824347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065542827,0.0017395425,0.016705485,0.025332622,0.0013511957,0.00009352326,0.000111176596,0.00028269846,0.9478294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40220293,0.0031147653,0.010515254,0.026867758,0.0011527687,0.00034269068,0.00032329382,0.0007004905,0.55478007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870646,0.004743391,0.0005063462,0.0024762987,0.0031354802,0.0020739266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429333,0.0023564822,0.00049904286,0.0011128882,0.0012695494,0.00046877115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073067537,0.00069609063,0.0005816289,0.0013396956,0.009889945,0.009373297,0.0024131988,0.007440343,0.02556677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018250372,0.0005289095,0.00063220167,0.0013069559,0.0164154,0.0091767255,0.012603717,0.008049943,0.0081242435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000587972,0.0000071329414,0.00015650727,0.000019618723,0.0000013734209,0.00010829648,0.005229687,0.00006242814,0.00011389492,0.9637429,0.020247068,0.010305228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005949686,0.000015321275,0.00015543081,0.00015465131,0.0000053651684,0.00013999685,0.0029403383,0.00012904052,0.00036590113,0.05501093,0.94106495,0.000012119246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015149314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014383972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02556677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009055452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144078275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08552933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019615438","doi":"","title":"The Hallett Decrees And Acequia Water Rights\\nAdministration On Rio Culebra In Colorado","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Feature (linguistics); Period (music); Nova scotia","score_opus":0.033845606743309935,"score_gpt":0.28960878259900663,"score_spread":0.2557631758556967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019615438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2071656,0.003275334,0.00078754104,0.076146215,0.0013854849,0.00040308703,0.000607939,0.00007121975,0.7101576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56070215,0.0012127548,0.0005222867,0.022863192,0.000337406,0.0002704123,0.00015157042,0.00006247428,0.41387776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967955,0.00033512185,0.00007197979,0.0004353669,0.00043060837,0.0019313957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982362,0.0007042472,0.00011908031,0.00012419338,0.0004309064,0.00038536938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020635927,0.00027134523,0.0005262114,0.0007062807,0.029468391,0.0075096283,0.0018284041,0.010653239,0.009679281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059250584,0.0007969114,0.00046038136,0.0007305169,0.007818762,0.0017585995,0.0043511856,0.009538384,0.00043283694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018493891,0.00021890044,0.018030895,0.00020020842,0.00006178364,0.0025761495,0.030336361,0.0010008396,0.0016613181,0.671331,0.25076553,0.023632053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073718635,0.00008613692,0.049974676,0.0003324187,0.00007461614,0.00017068553,0.022901217,0.00044965488,0.001679933,0.015532144,0.9086186,0.00010624862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77412266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9290587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77412266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020942163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034866955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45441514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019770552","doi":"","title":"1968 House Bill 3157. An Act Providing For The Acquisition Of Land Situated In Salisbury By The Town Of Salisbury From The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legislature; Situated; Legislation; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.012917254799336397,"score_gpt":0.24768635685149423,"score_spread":0.23476910205215784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019770552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021718189,0.0014334751,0.00039686006,0.007913255,0.0010962937,0.00014618125,0.008340568,0.00030670155,0.9781948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009838716,0.0006266841,0.00031359782,0.0035462214,0.00021400957,0.00009890612,0.001800172,0.000085567786,0.9834763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868983,0.00010638724,0.000091911694,0.00014480631,0.0006306389,0.00033640198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992625,0.00012548506,0.000072853,0.000057641024,0.0004074131,0.000074093754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629311,0.0009584913,0.0003128609,0.0011263593,0.0035207726,0.0018281336,0.00084646244,0.003960026,0.13757722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036833405,0.0007353079,0.000433683,0.0013835581,0.000956012,0.0012452898,0.0011770272,0.0031944367,0.0755744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033007625,0.000024175737,0.00036541565,0.000050113886,0.000002901834,0.00014829503,0.00035363954,0.000057416197,0.00033679948,0.04379701,0.9420259,0.012805326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013925521,0.000008946174,0.0022155808,0.00006492086,0.0000051570883,0.00004485475,0.000111875015,0.000030404039,0.00014762841,0.0015850374,0.9957634,0.000008256336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.208928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38131472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.208928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005601581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005269861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46024168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023923562","doi":"","title":"Positive Covenants and the Inherent Instability of Alteration Agreements Within Condominium: <em>The Owners, Strata Plan NW 2476 v. Jensen</em>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Liability; Supreme court; Property (philosophy); Common law; Dispute resolution; Abandonment (legal)","score_opus":0.022940552865706253,"score_gpt":0.28277967129413606,"score_spread":0.2598391184284298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023923562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09716248,0.003198072,0.017410541,0.06766694,0.00096275,0.00021073785,0.00018480192,0.00020026378,0.81300336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8880515,0.0007078613,0.0023576438,0.021957437,0.0004038595,0.0002302358,0.00008152435,0.00013024671,0.086079665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777053,0.0070691486,0.0008653103,0.0035722966,0.006159902,0.0046281316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98115796,0.010875247,0.0014469138,0.0015207806,0.0034812393,0.0015178255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018188756,0.0004390146,0.000514936,0.001062156,0.021441488,0.015541436,0.003410164,0.01267839,0.00759517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038150355,0.0010733395,0.0005353847,0.001265871,0.02502374,0.009198681,0.0065028523,0.015904361,0.0012325101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018215833,0.000013013452,0.0010636466,0.00001881205,0.0000048477327,0.00029439182,0.009618585,0.00015506866,0.00013587203,0.96869004,0.01592492,0.0040626694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007999322,0.00009561544,0.0077168825,0.00057888485,0.00005675588,0.00070632127,0.025156118,0.0026420117,0.001287057,0.35358652,0.6078575,0.00023624234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27018747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4023253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27018747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017233891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020957846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5372296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025323328","doi":"","title":"Volumetric Subdivision and the Architectures of Property","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Property (philosophy); Real property; Property law; Statutory law; Space (punctuation); Subdivision; Property rights; Architecture","score_opus":0.010825889123523462,"score_gpt":0.28238228651742064,"score_spread":0.2715563973938972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025323328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091833115,0.003100522,0.10606911,0.0057688598,0.000123342,0.00004974939,0.00007075415,0.00017332842,0.79281116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529426,0.0010768864,0.014250921,0.0002418079,0.00004671821,0.00004070372,0.000059531903,0.00005696181,0.031283855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880373,0.00045443868,0.000034269626,0.00018697443,0.00030821344,0.00021227915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914086,0.0002444511,0.00010182136,0.00025392848,0.0001586102,0.00010021581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011193719,0.00028889359,0.00022387652,0.0011554005,0.0035750414,0.007116902,0.0009639568,0.0012357532,0.006546136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002160437,0.00024222893,0.00038823133,0.0016004948,0.028061455,0.0061343727,0.004240663,0.001282129,0.0006755624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024719725,0.0000011112371,0.00009215248,0.0000035356225,7.27817e-7,0.000017267512,0.00070393697,0.0004365915,0.000041035164,0.9961116,0.00022888252,0.0023608026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055541286,0.000010138254,0.00055022974,0.000037481128,0.000004461566,0.000068611786,0.0012493216,0.0019114838,0.00020445326,0.9086648,0.08728361,0.000009969535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023489276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024490604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023489276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006999688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002662867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050786495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7041962174","doi":"","title":"Offshore Wind Development in the Great Lakes: Accessing Untapped Energy Potential Through International and Interstate Agreement to Overcome Public Trust Concerns","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public trust doctrine; Scrutiny; Doctrine; Public trust; Ambiguity; Public interest; Renewable energy; Wind power","score_opus":0.043715339772431264,"score_gpt":0.30117676391092296,"score_spread":0.2574614241384917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7041962174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1430347,0.021597316,0.036611535,0.07813743,0.0008799393,0.0002468459,0.000099495555,0.00014502883,0.7192477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922485,0.014530082,0.007885169,0.005965543,0.000177769,0.00014803618,0.00011164537,0.000032757787,0.04866395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966545,0.0013465373,0.00015097576,0.00016252883,0.0010878395,0.00059753197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971629,0.0011265209,0.00033548285,0.00020118742,0.00087341754,0.00030041288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036477868,0.00020117598,0.0001486636,0.0006607229,0.0026821143,0.0051139304,0.0009792728,0.0023201958,0.0030742385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047247354,0.0001611833,0.00046396063,0.000854499,0.0050815386,0.0053091124,0.0060352497,0.0024139693,0.00022893018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002008315,0.0000263154,0.002549832,0.00039647723,0.000022366456,0.001267661,0.009827367,0.001576761,0.0010098547,0.9305647,0.012013832,0.040724814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023883036,0.00010776129,0.00856957,0.0023840938,0.000074547745,0.0006468863,0.025761122,0.0033214618,0.0023654865,0.14188965,0.81479,0.000065479064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062386364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12760645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9376136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007771273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023919642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124046445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043014668","doi":"","title":"Review of <i>Aboriginal Title and Indigenous Peoples: Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.</i> Edited by Louis A. Knafla and Haijo Westra.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Indigenous; Discipline; Jurisdiction; Frame (networking)","score_opus":0.024578008223141937,"score_gpt":0.2416431876121418,"score_spread":0.21706517938899986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043014668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016371177,0.99266875,0.000020404057,0.0032866413,0.0015681483,0.0000059616254,0.00010290726,0.000003662941,0.0021797854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018049744,0.99111617,0.00006826225,0.0011981868,0.0005530297,0.000009559502,0.00014681701,0.0000054421153,0.0050976286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988952,0.000107125124,0.00008249577,0.000088942914,0.0006827159,0.00014352845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617517,0.00052015187,0.0002661434,0.000049510927,0.002624873,0.00036407233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016967214,0.0010349734,0.0017807982,0.0068299887,0.0026245122,0.003215717,0.0017087465,0.0013440377,0.007459951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003896906,0.0007051354,0.00047133813,0.019283645,0.0029421635,0.0024129946,0.0013816304,0.0019922347,0.0013640391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034712863,0.000017510478,0.00072505925,0.01692434,0.00006347554,0.00021359774,0.00272552,0.0001716401,0.0002141703,0.0050068134,0.7495042,0.2243989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027909714,0.000008604614,0.004784421,0.006312341,0.000028910697,0.00011303419,0.0012248427,0.000011934002,0.00003500771,0.0002789806,0.9871862,0.00001284665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81392485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9133408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18607515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019541362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0754876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3743419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043528855","doi":"","title":"“There’s a Moment When All Old Things Become New Again”: The Canadian Oil and Gas Royalty – A Modern Rent Charge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Flexibility (engineering); Investment (military); Real property; Value (mathematics); Production (economics); Petroleum industry; Energy law; Peak oil","score_opus":0.03273996349982775,"score_gpt":0.26623578629049405,"score_spread":0.2334958227906663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043528855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052147225,0.013930459,0.0062176073,0.21306542,0.0017845471,0.000041353007,0.00022026946,0.0000898672,0.71250325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8391065,0.006667434,0.002220261,0.024289792,0.0005397568,0.00002185081,0.00008175067,0.00010604993,0.12696664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979436,0.00024887902,0.000018869807,0.00021222117,0.001002623,0.00057372986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.00016888554,0.000062451676,0.00004674404,0.00047882288,0.00014436607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009647884,0.00033346977,0.00020834742,0.0008746018,0.022035675,0.010257293,0.0012745532,0.0038495758,0.0051155197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028231605,0.00024525722,0.0002977923,0.0013347835,0.023225928,0.004650106,0.0019873155,0.0047841365,0.0005544014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013066952,0.0000056150543,0.0005962983,0.000028208764,0.000003798205,0.0002972088,0.012785711,0.00018076153,0.00021569408,0.91656536,0.058396854,0.010911462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065722325,0.000008825016,0.0035028032,0.00014860735,0.000012793899,0.0002885902,0.018400937,0.0005084419,0.0004688925,0.07169943,0.904865,0.00008910792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9410846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96787953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06278597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06278597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048551545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4555462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7044086136","doi":"","title":"\"There's a Moment When All Old Things Become New Again\": The Canadian Oil and Gas Royalty - A Modern Rent Charge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Flexibility (engineering); Investment (military); Real property; Value (mathematics); Production (economics); Petroleum industry; Energy law; Peak oil","score_opus":0.12319879440037455,"score_gpt":0.3336927304570016,"score_spread":0.21049393605662703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7044086136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05926003,0.012165748,0.0049085952,0.18254447,0.0014586803,0.00004175914,0.00017943476,0.00008973111,0.73935163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85058665,0.0060130395,0.0016404305,0.019027302,0.000370136,0.000020122035,0.000056275745,0.00008286369,0.12220321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980361,0.00025911926,0.000018018049,0.00018794228,0.00092347834,0.00057538535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992207,0.00017426466,0.000059388352,0.000036299425,0.0003841631,0.00012511466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009933491,0.00035064612,0.00021664608,0.0008648274,0.023790354,0.010574624,0.0012975625,0.003866615,0.0048761326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002931701,0.00022820666,0.00027486606,0.0013771508,0.024927814,0.00448304,0.0022010251,0.004795424,0.00048278118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012998231,0.0000064070605,0.0006408863,0.000032150136,0.000003182663,0.00035767237,0.01943324,0.00016317567,0.00019965891,0.9182214,0.049163703,0.011765444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008814074,0.00001192053,0.0048314473,0.00021469494,0.000019122834,0.00038493378,0.043903086,0.0006711428,0.00054814917,0.08669174,0.8626119,0.000103041326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9423005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97245854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06380537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06380537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054869846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46294254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067925579","doi":"","title":"Nation Rise Wind Farm Assessing Legal Action Following the Government of Ontario’s Unprecedented Decision to Revoke its Renewable Energy Approval","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Renewable energy; Energy policy; Public policy","score_opus":0.037853330275684605,"score_gpt":0.30550333598621066,"score_spread":0.26765000571052605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067925579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16559143,0.00077761477,0.0015839341,0.068130106,0.0006962604,0.0007390366,0.0076362733,0.00018785062,0.75465757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44121584,0.0009719744,0.0024951359,0.012197819,0.00018261996,0.00021434663,0.0026953868,0.00014212253,0.5398847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450374,0.0002757627,0.00012182982,0.00020249403,0.0035057608,0.0013903939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98418796,0.0031367755,0.000538501,0.00038701235,0.010203826,0.0015458608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042825616,0.00021238455,0.00024240148,0.0018240857,0.008831784,0.0070894733,0.0012721858,0.0055426187,0.012840783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017690923,0.00031058327,0.00037456467,0.0014472296,0.0026629253,0.0014639705,0.0017514668,0.0032444259,0.0011068132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023360731,0.00017745775,0.058507405,0.00031048438,0.000061143444,0.002620973,0.015153002,0.0026490912,0.0020508852,0.13554852,0.74059975,0.042087764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005992264,0.00006474982,0.119054206,0.00031836546,0.000051639996,0.00009366458,0.02615747,0.0031201525,0.0014691259,0.008978395,0.8405326,0.000099786186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080726765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080726765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14202861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5857164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070779861","doi":"","title":"A Property Law Reader: Cases, Questions, and Commentary, 5th ed.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property law; Indigenous; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Meaning (existential); Real property; Value (mathematics); Intellectual property","score_opus":0.025503292092713715,"score_gpt":0.2878017450693656,"score_spread":0.2622984529766519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070779861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017399536,0.18577224,0.002048181,0.1504065,0.016517842,0.000101625265,0.00046230058,0.0002276158,0.64272386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035325944,0.103424296,0.001851914,0.052385207,0.008185203,0.0003124369,0.0006655903,0.0002753487,0.79757404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819535,0.00044193777,0.000073517826,0.00013792628,0.0008974208,0.0002538232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982607,0.0010574682,0.00010416582,0.000077604745,0.00039967144,0.00010037955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014723781,0.00054196845,0.00039377055,0.0020789208,0.0045733736,0.006423186,0.0019191569,0.005588783,0.03713128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007763665,0.00052158855,0.0003587674,0.0029782436,0.0054738754,0.0070128376,0.0027118796,0.003918412,0.013101595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034217169,0.0000078816765,0.000034261266,0.0000753432,7.797549e-7,0.00008936993,0.0014716181,0.00002483764,0.000053676526,0.03747428,0.9444409,0.016323749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015373564,0.0000018953499,0.00012691195,0.00026421176,7.1383755e-7,0.00007212395,0.0010486732,0.000016505552,0.000026806898,0.004574317,0.9938624,0.000003941225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044323225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073673666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044323225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006232003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1242165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7084235369","doi":"","title":"Radical Agreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Agreement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.024947133987708314,"score_gpt":0.29380765232156764,"score_spread":0.2688605183338593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7084235369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009497157,0.00065504416,0.025456822,0.021451058,0.0010795594,0.00006415507,0.00017389018,0.0000737523,0.9415485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72961247,0.0009864535,0.012226435,0.014713618,0.0017854659,0.00034445274,0.00039825015,0.00021321003,0.2397196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940322,0.0016421806,0.00021807235,0.0014642802,0.0016637166,0.0009796158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954053,0.001781755,0.00029193927,0.0012672003,0.000985228,0.00026858668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057299095,0.00035483495,0.00040597314,0.0010963937,0.0060482128,0.0047568,0.0020986053,0.0036067928,0.037140843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012394829,0.00018180358,0.00084533845,0.00096808065,0.009263898,0.007781556,0.0054241903,0.0066051725,0.004436121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002658498,0.0000031288578,0.00003502636,0.000005703393,0.0000010766985,0.000012192002,0.00061886816,0.000025577026,0.000027176768,0.99452037,0.0030768558,0.0016713665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008968631,0.000011471174,0.00020760174,0.000047183563,0.000005467184,0.000047801073,0.0010688303,0.0002759156,0.00016839188,0.83267164,0.16547684,0.000009869314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021826874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030707973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037140843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033960557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020968586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124248505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095292997","doi":"","title":"2 N,N 0)[2-tert-butylanilinato(2","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intramolecular force; Ligand (biochemistry); Atom (system on chip); Coordination sphere; Hydrogen bond; Hydrogen atom; Oxide; Molecule","score_opus":0.012257883323805691,"score_gpt":0.31288939296016044,"score_spread":0.30063150963635477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095292997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5894976,0.010029346,0.035216853,0.0013964128,0.0018415967,0.00045577713,0.00772518,0.0069072954,0.3469299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87451214,0.003500903,0.021369772,0.0011053534,0.00014525598,0.0006544332,0.0074219718,0.0008146798,0.09047553],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998392,0.00002027752,0.0000059237,0.00007051538,0.000028609855,0.000035389523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99993217,0.00000687627,0.000025464133,0.000016199454,0.000009882536,0.000009393773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001535807,0.00047769584,0.00043432385,0.00022418432,0.00043565093,0.00038131612,0.00077638763,0.0002769085,0.036086313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023513603,0.00019778099,0.0001148523,0.0003436566,0.00020444978,0.0003633598,0.0004447815,0.00039998637,0.0074233366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014985238,0.00014893421,0.0018874689,0.0027136388,0.0001454209,0.00069841713,0.00019414588,0.00345165,0.81130743,0.021409834,0.050180644,0.1063638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054766337,0.00080029736,0.00562235,0.00015797424,0.000085116175,0.0014169365,0.00016690466,0.013192685,0.3212228,0.0046606516,0.6520243,0.000102349055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001573447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022440474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003670776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030877755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120720744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095854342","doi":"","title":"Address for manuscript correspondence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Incentive; Information asymmetry; Moral hazard; Private information retrieval; Welfare; Private sector; Public good; Information economics","score_opus":0.054077062799252854,"score_gpt":0.32658754492123665,"score_spread":0.2725104821219838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095854342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024496983,0.0024227707,0.0047710575,0.040958486,0.055599622,0.0015877603,0.024125677,0.0038925605,0.86419237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015535022,0.0013706391,0.0035812748,0.01022565,0.0036104815,0.00074142806,0.009462269,0.0024434682,0.95302963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571097,0.00087364804,0.00034627042,0.0010702296,0.0014821927,0.00051673205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900227,0.0014375699,0.00039510836,0.0013253874,0.0046315035,0.002187784],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029352964,0.001313386,0.0012330642,0.0017283437,0.0025380081,0.0049363524,0.0033318014,0.0038684518,0.88561946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021193692,0.00051616086,0.0009046834,0.001333179,0.0007887189,0.003263056,0.0051834905,0.0021898816,0.6854754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010658303,0.00004631374,0.00055997993,0.00040803596,0.000010412262,0.00030134528,0.00022759971,0.00006473668,0.00022168626,0.0035152517,0.92090255,0.07363551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015339878,0.000016884635,0.00027849514,0.000109287976,0.0000053147755,0.00012164325,0.00016030716,0.00005158796,0.00010728644,0.0008437268,0.99828464,0.0000054767374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016823869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028326442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11438054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016745786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049840785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16314995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095895061","doi":"","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Incentive; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Natural resource; Property law; Tangible property","score_opus":0.18901999199442168,"score_gpt":0.38782608634084614,"score_spread":0.19880609434642446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095895061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009610017,0.0070250365,0.022772504,0.04481561,0.040794637,0.0017098638,0.05365408,0.007471655,0.8121466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04235648,0.0036268642,0.019516984,0.01686766,0.0023378907,0.0013512787,0.03631325,0.003859025,0.87377065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664706,0.0005159493,0.00017927415,0.00095851946,0.0013299597,0.0003692568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401,0.00067189336,0.00018786601,0.0005523828,0.0034492956,0.001128728],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030172865,0.0013903896,0.001414754,0.0016043464,0.0026209187,0.004402106,0.002814708,0.0024540129,0.5478146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010616505,0.00045989803,0.0008284039,0.0013645185,0.00081012055,0.0028220788,0.0049109086,0.0026585183,0.32840267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028579263,0.000064418455,0.001546894,0.0006210301,0.00001961954,0.00048551816,0.0007107357,0.00023534904,0.0016233883,0.0126436185,0.8837602,0.09800347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017068649,0.000023198689,0.00063530897,0.00016983671,0.0000110300425,0.00026482984,0.0003931576,0.00013737226,0.00042518481,0.0020116665,0.99589866,0.000012615206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007776058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4521854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002817122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005243538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6449876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095908665","doi":"","title":"The Chief Corporate Officer recommends that:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Expropriation; Chief executive officer; Property (philosophy); Dual (grammatical number)","score_opus":0.13325474820204602,"score_gpt":0.2939910511392634,"score_spread":0.16073630293721736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095908665","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060386006,0.0011740455,0.0014415723,0.65970707,0.02037816,0.002106752,0.002616691,0.0012423599,0.30529484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008464985,0.00084523874,0.0010663756,0.12524906,0.0016616769,0.000306848,0.0005751179,0.00009641773,0.8617343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663526,0.00021537257,0.00027870323,0.0004048709,0.0014968921,0.0009688776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875234,0.00095248315,0.00042130283,0.00028958506,0.007996727,0.0028165125],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021920959,0.0007833361,0.0006034387,0.0010939081,0.0062568286,0.005236211,0.0018807702,0.021436881,0.14985383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008712612,0.00074994616,0.00054493867,0.0010217791,0.001712741,0.0025541477,0.001354568,0.007587151,0.08484381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008914969,0.000022892096,0.00062216877,0.000035947854,0.000001321862,0.00021830433,0.00010539637,0.000019767447,0.00019473485,0.00092639105,0.99206877,0.0057754107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002489469,0.000038218503,0.0023676923,0.000071286304,0.00000758003,0.00006847448,0.0010466877,0.00007754729,0.00022548198,0.00019569111,0.99586004,0.000016446558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23286118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51913273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004301495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039266612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50131094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096348925","doi":"","title":"Great Lobbying Allocation And Dissipation Of Rents In A Dynamic Commonagency Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Markov perfect equilibrium; Economic rent; Pareto principle; Sequential game; Welfare; Markov chain; Pareto efficiency; Markov process; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.03354525851645872,"score_gpt":0.3396483175248989,"score_spread":0.30610305900844015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096348925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6292468,0.0005062829,0.2491327,0.005891204,0.00010300112,0.00020658507,0.0005261555,0.00018456722,0.114202686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823574,0.00014704741,0.0035154512,0.00015134279,0.00001959802,0.000060702543,0.000044408178,0.000015596155,0.013688436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886274,0.00038683705,0.000039298637,0.00021545227,0.00011987688,0.0003758382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714774,0.0012551248,0.00068793405,0.00020329862,0.00017473867,0.0005312699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019508527,0.00073198415,0.0010857277,0.00062950654,0.0012190865,0.0028951576,0.0018335546,0.0027129864,0.010994635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049286154,0.0004974548,0.0008892378,0.0005219521,0.0039045487,0.0034981389,0.002337322,0.0019582822,0.0008230057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021176659,0.00014278453,0.002458981,0.00006338612,0.000064194915,0.0005041646,0.00048853573,0.34044003,0.0018056121,0.64654315,0.0023864286,0.0048909513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120150515,0.00009775175,0.0011472903,0.000027682176,0.000038633614,0.00008746949,0.00035981415,0.6640002,0.0002437499,0.3309526,0.0028757446,0.00004886695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011057055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008225561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011057055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033846984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019368678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036780775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096633240","doi":"","title":"Title of Project: The Impact of Open Market Share Repurchases on","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Open market operation; Reproduction; Order (exchange); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.09558869775891171,"score_gpt":0.409933510397085,"score_spread":0.31434481263817327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096633240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4279648,0.00416492,0.0051839994,0.016987374,0.0015942894,0.0016315771,0.024715928,0.00057829596,0.51717883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8248529,0.0010859156,0.0008279741,0.00083979295,0.00044744575,0.0003928991,0.005010066,0.00029831182,0.1662447],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452066,0.0014229249,0.00023662978,0.0004907735,0.0028626022,0.00046629953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.931577,0.03407339,0.011063287,0.0029604167,0.014526123,0.0057997536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008338033,0.00027661116,0.00060070324,0.001020619,0.0011184814,0.006827294,0.0011754149,0.0018537149,0.12673481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06768619,0.00019413725,0.0004992261,0.0014985629,0.0012422611,0.0035778438,0.002581092,0.0019610352,0.017555809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015276418,0.0031864343,0.18590435,0.0021733532,0.0006132072,0.0007362705,0.0033002594,0.0067936787,0.004830899,0.15291724,0.30999953,0.3142684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023649507,0.004133809,0.61437416,0.0013145758,0.00087805116,0.00035573897,0.0079078665,0.015526189,0.010234749,0.07434898,0.26832762,0.0002332933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009830859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011084202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8732652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002221492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068825423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42397016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096674037","doi":"","title":"Public Lands Operational Handbook","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Government (linguistics); Majesty; Liability; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.08835987594396,"score_gpt":0.30015833560599686,"score_spread":0.21179845966203686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096674037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023373733,0.006395602,0.009507016,0.0033126448,0.0012227669,0.00046291557,0.0660072,0.0027151383,0.90803933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021317972,0.012179444,0.017284771,0.00046808747,0.00027911385,0.00033313563,0.06645112,0.0015020991,0.8801843],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873835,0.00012453464,0.0001130104,0.00007857838,0.00084844383,0.00009715098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979898,0.00021208897,0.00009246987,0.00026049127,0.0013289598,0.000116227355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016064133,0.0005575736,0.0004565946,0.003922177,0.0012252803,0.0038047868,0.0017862415,0.00065111835,0.23829724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00269977,0.0005370739,0.00026491666,0.0065269875,0.00050535443,0.0023365305,0.001013347,0.0010211072,0.12629224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002681835,0.000037651662,0.00067739876,0.00028978937,0.000004195504,0.000050367973,0.00021971039,0.00057109375,0.00027010255,0.0094093215,0.78160024,0.20684332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018564311,0.0000049570544,0.00085995573,0.00007822112,0.0000014561112,0.00003814444,0.0001667618,0.000082099665,0.00006151779,0.00072208134,0.9979784,0.0000045685083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089991875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12788601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23829724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003122437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008351627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7971837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096737833","doi":"","title":"Reference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Tax exemption; Capital (architecture); Property tax; Real property; Space (punctuation); Square (algebra)","score_opus":0.039907920663465775,"score_gpt":0.334631936368542,"score_spread":0.2947240157050762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096737833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003345706,0.0013355438,0.002063513,0.0038569432,0.0063678054,0.00030918623,0.011765951,0.0021313892,0.97183514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022070087,0.0016831815,0.0016190665,0.001710558,0.0006471947,0.00014653127,0.012789141,0.0008330665,0.9783643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773216,0.00020946143,0.00013411131,0.00033344113,0.0013633394,0.00022730841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971238,0.00025403211,0.00007628213,0.00046382516,0.0018136333,0.00026839226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011941866,0.00096356386,0.00081938226,0.0027223728,0.0020006048,0.008006133,0.0027961698,0.0026357246,0.7291048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067296987,0.00046604776,0.0008822347,0.0035815325,0.00070858677,0.0046670316,0.0030736204,0.002022523,0.6852435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012908859,0.000022132856,0.00012471912,0.00012978821,0.0000021804985,0.00004429145,0.00008542189,0.000047899655,0.00009694109,0.006758704,0.9355654,0.057109516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018792555,0.000004792508,0.00013482614,0.00006558968,0.0000011833996,0.000031090047,0.00006281178,0.000010976554,0.000040469487,0.00060774724,0.9990357,0.0000029709693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015020871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012060646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27089518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029703914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005290122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097161701","doi":"","title":"STANISLAUS COUNTY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Patience; Valuation (finance); State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.11064883865182555,"score_gpt":0.29415720223602343,"score_spread":0.18350836358419786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097161701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027980953,0.0023133548,0.0010637308,0.006589789,0.0012972637,0.00037988613,0.08128217,0.0013834351,0.87770945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038132165,0.0011986387,0.0016650498,0.0014020322,0.00016330338,0.00038302407,0.035550237,0.00025669482,0.9212488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990421,0.00007772751,0.000051564366,0.0002067717,0.00044987188,0.00017194694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983418,0.00018332881,0.0001306521,0.00011504953,0.00095570215,0.00027342915],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057779485,0.0005174145,0.00041253495,0.002573885,0.002995293,0.002626444,0.0007648082,0.00061678403,0.3047125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025514949,0.0004483579,0.00016803107,0.002281459,0.00028229234,0.0011209885,0.0017293502,0.0009953827,0.08604197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005004226,0.000047050366,0.007985003,0.00009056784,0.0000042821116,0.000070363916,0.0003001454,0.000050512055,0.00011103812,0.0040593017,0.9307174,0.056514405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007228441,0.000016076167,0.012348658,0.000072874594,0.0000030399124,0.0000396568,0.00044449675,0.00005507923,0.0000841841,0.00036920956,0.98655206,0.000007371698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074006006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19950373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69528747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002777015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007411923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097602484","doi":"","title":"Ownership","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Block (permutation group theory); Quarter (Canadian coin); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.18716949750731945,"score_gpt":0.3554271968070139,"score_spread":0.16825769929969445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097602484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004641067,0.00015238291,0.00030898367,0.00034332386,0.00022320513,0.000034555374,0.009190005,0.0003208837,0.9889625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003777536,0.00017607368,0.000099788165,0.00011275434,0.00005549039,0.000030795763,0.0030298939,0.0001300023,0.9925876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993437,0.00004739212,0.000032931945,0.00012290505,0.00031582892,0.0001372929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988895,0.000094687915,0.00008339683,0.0002404195,0.00051322026,0.00017884836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035683915,0.000511904,0.00034863365,0.0012108174,0.0016192656,0.0038899586,0.0007652565,0.00068487396,0.73296285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018556206,0.00031873133,0.0002536207,0.0022294375,0.0004312114,0.0026776856,0.0013084393,0.0010258993,0.57774377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010924767,0.0000110788405,0.0003300174,0.000033852757,0.0000010247313,0.000022198788,0.000081682425,0.000025726793,0.00011239531,0.019185342,0.94880426,0.03138159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016056339,0.0000034926445,0.0006270444,0.000018077772,5.6256823e-7,0.000016635215,0.00004686214,0.00002029391,0.00004463228,0.0005323882,0.99868625,0.0000020653704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013301653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016617838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73296285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012523188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014499292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097765890","doi":"","title":"Udvers i ty of Alberta Losing the Game: Wildlife Conservation and the Regulation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; North American Model of Wildlife Conservation; Wildlife management; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04514841181480491,"score_gpt":0.28321849448808356,"score_spread":0.23807008267327864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097765890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3225638,0.00630702,0.0010348746,0.105434395,0.00087338284,0.000049316186,0.0003978347,0.000039993913,0.5632994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9185901,0.0015056198,0.0002933461,0.0074532847,0.00010519118,0.000019235438,0.00008909632,0.000016551445,0.07192763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978732,0.00033798662,0.00003720169,0.00022125377,0.00050637237,0.0010239767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997837,0.0005145413,0.00020182882,0.00009686781,0.00065788685,0.00069181254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002445132,0.00023893162,0.00034724068,0.0012266664,0.013688493,0.010658298,0.0020973363,0.0048785047,0.010076921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004488427,0.0002512716,0.00027433774,0.0010892157,0.014017381,0.0020596883,0.0030326566,0.0055513303,0.00028395592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002287924,0.00017659285,0.038233265,0.00008094877,0.000046879275,0.0013509816,0.029268738,0.0019080768,0.0010508052,0.80045927,0.08123147,0.04596416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055686913,0.0001176924,0.13730507,0.00058067864,0.000121916506,0.0005175917,0.17533766,0.0028220513,0.001026849,0.15204704,0.5298422,0.00022566023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96566874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043277264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043277264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075718805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100462915","doi":"","title":"Province of Ontario C","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.07323596821571475,"score_gpt":0.29878388753680085,"score_spread":0.2255479193210861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100462915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017709313,0.0028366651,0.0008518331,0.004578779,0.0008768977,0.00050945766,0.06058281,0.0006463634,0.9114079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017650502,0.0010085203,0.00048783323,0.00048290755,0.000038035974,0.00007491167,0.0042736684,0.00012340686,0.97586024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988374,0.000047500384,0.000033109736,0.00017040416,0.00046659427,0.0004449644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984048,0.00010361587,0.000094300594,0.00008782919,0.0010378275,0.0002716993],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036302727,0.0008142382,0.0007352575,0.001889393,0.007406406,0.0036200802,0.0010685642,0.0012476691,0.24569891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001940516,0.0006395318,0.00065214647,0.004062755,0.0011744424,0.00073407707,0.0013103649,0.00090012065,0.043921612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024016874,0.000048810783,0.009913431,0.0007555144,0.000051103823,0.0008793549,0.00091673416,0.0004984291,0.0007347558,0.023330722,0.9013144,0.061316606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045371697,0.000019373958,0.026129022,0.00016609041,0.00001858281,0.00014036684,0.0008631021,0.0002702068,0.0002816907,0.0006670576,0.97137535,0.000023759032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98312485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99362177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7543011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0337877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08154783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8219447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100699795","doi":"","title":"Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Correlation of Private and Public Interests in Land Law: Continuation of the Optimal Combination Search","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuation; Public domain; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Public opinion","score_opus":0.019913321477079315,"score_gpt":0.27986697622991746,"score_spread":0.25995365475283816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100699795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09433342,0.0030917642,0.012084163,0.01544782,0.0003015508,0.00008637129,0.0014037499,0.00011657761,0.87313455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9097771,0.0028409741,0.0068665873,0.0005442545,0.00014638559,0.0000566595,0.00030233146,0.00005009185,0.079415545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999519,0.00015998867,0.00002289935,0.00009546557,0.00011530994,0.00008730846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978854,0.0012039118,0.00016596033,0.00018264864,0.00044041316,0.000121721765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078798394,0.00028502214,0.0010760787,0.0009974061,0.0018714489,0.007892764,0.00067346066,0.0010186698,0.106529005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007238618,0.00029278046,0.00042809785,0.001846233,0.002379494,0.0017084813,0.0011295618,0.00078678713,0.0023340553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018079302,0.00008776361,0.012537549,0.00028103002,0.00009344098,0.00033459073,0.0006629349,0.017915236,0.0004261211,0.7812785,0.060312897,0.12588921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017220959,0.0000780622,0.029714148,0.00036287293,0.00025005382,0.00040282143,0.005186746,0.10610052,0.00067164225,0.6661204,0.19086334,0.000077192635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35711473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35992587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64288527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068273037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010647522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71007216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117148552","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5790363","title":"&lt;p&gt;Eminent Domain: A Critical Analysis of the Balance Between Public Purpose and Property Rights Under Indian and Canadian Law&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Expropriation; Public domain; Doctrine; Government (linguistics); Property rights; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.016765054147002474,"score_gpt":0.2730595272499414,"score_spread":0.25629447310293896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117148552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10077805,0.0022528092,0.0077619217,0.060852047,0.0002532584,0.00010411639,0.00019786124,0.000052142394,0.82774776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861042,0.00046238134,0.0012097084,0.0019760213,0.000089697984,0.00003543247,0.00002073715,0.000027820019,0.010073995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996089,0.0010762792,0.00006850674,0.00036371083,0.0011631312,0.0012394025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99001783,0.0063406797,0.00047764948,0.00044857623,0.0019706585,0.00074462924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068566697,0.00046133794,0.0005244896,0.006509445,0.019383505,0.01480635,0.0027257537,0.0052730264,0.008649181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015245371,0.00030014443,0.0005752293,0.0053087343,0.072156794,0.009804677,0.004026142,0.0083918655,0.00033501428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047266435,0.0000022132467,0.00007104778,0.000006003871,7.612478e-7,0.000023219782,0.002909042,0.000033736545,0.000021322041,0.9950205,0.0010353341,0.00087203906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019844354,0.0000109911625,0.003383356,0.00019458201,0.00003062672,0.00007330144,0.036671035,0.0010544008,0.000505001,0.89960915,0.05840947,0.000038275954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56486183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57138574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43513817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06122118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040219504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87540156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119522914","doi":"10.58837/chula.is.2024.391","title":"Section 94 of the Land Code B.E. 2497: Legal Issues Concerning Illegal Acquisition, Disposal, and Retention of Land by Foreigners","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislative history; Dispose pattern; Enforcement; Legislature; Statutory law; Section (typography); Normative; Land registration; Legal certainty; Doctrine","score_opus":0.015869863772220053,"score_gpt":0.2920684017147229,"score_spread":0.2761985379425029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119522914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29279464,0.006945118,0.008497991,0.034934934,0.00049334165,0.00019398092,0.0008603977,0.00010505383,0.6551745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92965436,0.0041375277,0.003377103,0.009974109,0.000329948,0.00015630352,0.00025252768,0.000036394118,0.052081816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951566,0.0016016423,0.0004691815,0.00043407074,0.0017490668,0.0005893296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98026466,0.013729742,0.0026356175,0.00073037436,0.0022342613,0.00040534136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042550983,0.0002421617,0.00019043311,0.0012169651,0.0045967163,0.005203236,0.0008929571,0.004046632,0.0037795727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010081236,0.00028882746,0.00025474615,0.0018605811,0.010229408,0.0019069522,0.0013081571,0.0028832215,0.0005763016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051407103,0.000063101455,0.015764147,0.00035207873,0.00001374741,0.0030861122,0.03113852,0.0013339871,0.002436968,0.88028306,0.03408849,0.031388465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029203498,0.0002854481,0.066074125,0.002861004,0.00008444543,0.003785605,0.053654395,0.0019405712,0.008599477,0.06485054,0.7975586,0.0002767328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06684198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07217831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06684198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047607003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012101942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13290584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124228793","doi":"","title":"Dunsmuir: A View from South of the Border","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Deference; Administrative law; Charter; Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Conversation; State (computer science); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.02226851983409456,"score_gpt":0.28339309888607184,"score_spread":0.2611245790519773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124228793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02473035,0.021390164,0.00089211884,0.56822544,0.011231654,0.000028626495,0.00011794356,0.00012686955,0.3732568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36063698,0.00715924,0.0021877866,0.23442098,0.0017703387,0.00010676538,0.00015787977,0.00032476953,0.39323536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488574,0.0015334566,0.0001354582,0.0007844438,0.0010299314,0.001631031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739826,0.00082033756,0.0001647288,0.00019214611,0.0006683833,0.0007562722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043779677,0.000371821,0.00051459204,0.0013749733,0.02693093,0.021468984,0.0019188465,0.0095279515,0.018977052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075566797,0.00064027763,0.0005136913,0.0013966179,0.0093983505,0.007927877,0.0071452246,0.0139627,0.0018894991],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007406791,0.000026876502,0.001056837,0.0001161206,0.000007876736,0.00083708164,0.026512217,0.00008099809,0.00044223355,0.6683316,0.2816092,0.02090489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081614235,0.0000145446065,0.0009017874,0.00021088491,0.000005258522,0.000115236464,0.013091395,0.000055322973,0.00012845447,0.00994053,0.9755039,0.000024514819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4422813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54889965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4422813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023465978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028280417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8794139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125704442","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-069","title":"8.2 The Durability of Terra Nullius: Tsilhqot’in v. British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Period (music); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02206481248893614,"score_gpt":0.20944594024654015,"score_spread":0.18738112775760402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125704442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020633943,0.0029653155,0.0005743126,0.014809225,0.00025500247,0.000030217712,0.00014327075,0.000027854752,0.9605608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4347324,0.0016027928,0.0004072787,0.007894996,0.00008432052,0.000049666007,0.000093800554,0.00006388077,0.55507094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987386,0.00016015688,0.00003054194,0.00011568079,0.00037732095,0.0005777424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993241,0.0001872507,0.000031940188,0.000044279943,0.00033401488,0.00007839715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085307006,0.0003259715,0.00027279212,0.0011025497,0.013969438,0.0072060754,0.0013394366,0.004566066,0.021040514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020778251,0.00033926894,0.0002587854,0.0013111938,0.0077396017,0.002377703,0.002190958,0.0052506784,0.00252155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034981997,0.000012575505,0.001897485,0.000076753444,0.00000573119,0.0006863534,0.02076064,0.00010189788,0.00038544493,0.84907794,0.10442113,0.022539154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011662144,0.000013786624,0.004838861,0.00037736387,0.000017907441,0.00025956327,0.012569042,0.00020972379,0.00072981016,0.038941447,0.94198406,0.000046811147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8023546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9261378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023706075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018377542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39761877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133078665","doi":"","title":"&apos;Formalizing&apos; Land Tenure in First Nations: Evaluating the Case for Reserve Tenure Reform","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land tenure; Land rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Higher education; Land use","score_opus":0.1403153404214487,"score_gpt":0.45851053267619596,"score_spread":0.31819519225474724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133078665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20678313,0.002847122,0.004655156,0.17551944,0.00043253947,0.0002504883,0.000086477165,0.00004609705,0.60937965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97400075,0.0007113322,0.0011111397,0.007160107,0.00014244467,0.00012398006,0.000028239965,0.000012793908,0.01670916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989426,0.004992499,0.00022945701,0.00053164235,0.0012970907,0.0035233272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711675,0.018931935,0.0024080216,0.0014995778,0.0037040547,0.0022889297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016653417,0.00026431194,0.00043838998,0.0009954927,0.011379066,0.014112704,0.0025991153,0.009964355,0.011258109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038082924,0.00032317327,0.00053412333,0.0012187801,0.02589534,0.007822692,0.006419015,0.009354012,0.00043093835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003631505,0.000053424385,0.0019436787,0.000051337272,0.00000739913,0.00013943344,0.0034587735,0.0009190001,0.00010319606,0.9797738,0.007750477,0.005763191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032818955,0.00045009932,0.030199938,0.0015080789,0.0001499412,0.00022237611,0.062514305,0.009792768,0.0016716665,0.6162779,0.27671,0.00017479136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15509477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29133502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84490526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025115285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031952765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30838406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134330747","doi":"","title":"Leases as subdivisions of land : A comparative analysis of Singapore, New South Wales & British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subdivision; Lease; Zoning; Estate; Real estate; Easement; Estate planning; Demise; Land tenure","score_opus":0.031045804987597316,"score_gpt":0.2633649694453478,"score_spread":0.2323191644577505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134330747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571943,0.0009021443,0.000069134454,0.0005945375,0.000009030804,0.000025784062,0.000150102,0.0000036435133,0.04105139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108666,0.0008119107,0.00005946924,0.0001738638,0.0000014618183,0.000016251539,0.00014168065,0.0000058508936,0.0077028307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981515,0.00031413752,0.0001000467,0.00014216291,0.0006595154,0.0006326054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703634,0.0005238454,0.00044104757,0.00010703381,0.001247849,0.0006438135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007527858,0.00019185687,0.00041039565,0.0031384842,0.005511135,0.0046645114,0.0009250472,0.0005743415,0.0067285323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035453257,0.00024683742,0.0002589809,0.010871247,0.0030245981,0.0016778207,0.0028280148,0.0011525145,0.00048037578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039460196,0.0002748946,0.5212971,0.00070882495,0.00022123705,0.009183428,0.32100725,0.0010627646,0.0044412604,0.043067887,0.011627392,0.08671335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011325979,0.00006555202,0.64931214,0.00030110666,0.000053319138,0.00050656,0.30729374,0.00052377663,0.00035219305,0.0006746965,0.040847074,0.000058598052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9421519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057848096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034127653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021909105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24761462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7149221427","doi":"","title":"Ontario","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02277828229182468,"score_gpt":0.19008959635275702,"score_spread":0.16731131406093233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7149221427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008141706,0.0021592504,0.0005214556,0.0032099674,0.0005198095,0.0000696208,0.013498503,0.00032386457,0.9715559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011401352,0.00095797546,0.0003392252,0.00035332996,0.000024499377,0.000015604104,0.0016432293,0.000114039714,0.98515064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937207,0.000020978638,0.000016190148,0.00016099683,0.00028113928,0.00014860353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913186,0.0000674803,0.00005202473,0.000048005837,0.0005105715,0.00019006405],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018159706,0.0005716597,0.00044272127,0.00072890706,0.0068262108,0.0028544879,0.0007649656,0.0008139403,0.4533065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008254227,0.0004644359,0.00028090618,0.0017699257,0.0009314518,0.0008522052,0.0012067466,0.00077963463,0.11640932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035641133,0.00006428452,0.01449461,0.00067883515,0.000044305605,0.0017042592,0.0018509156,0.0004753971,0.0033305017,0.026864408,0.8145631,0.13557297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013747526,0.000012171274,0.009882912,0.00009239081,0.0000063283237,0.0001180588,0.00090868515,0.00011901835,0.00038589092,0.0006743636,0.9877721,0.000014343289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76939344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9510656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5466935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011909286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015281902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7153677248","doi":"","title":"CRT2 S3 Ep2: Eminent Domain: Discriminatory Land Takings and the Fight for Reparations","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Thriving; Power (physics); Jazz; White (mutation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Dance; Center (category theory)","score_opus":0.022756014639980993,"score_gpt":0.29247646965777657,"score_spread":0.26972045501779557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7153677248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021488797,0.001091619,0.0028918611,0.110854544,0.003247126,0.00015739346,0.0007810121,0.00020082167,0.85928684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13327315,0.00055691926,0.0012329239,0.17634013,0.0017650229,0.00025844475,0.00025746023,0.00037986093,0.6859361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951864,0.0011560948,0.00008566214,0.0006405985,0.0014547287,0.0014765753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980698,0.0008439412,0.000094930154,0.00020320948,0.000451271,0.00033680288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038234135,0.00068532774,0.00051764137,0.000482455,0.017869899,0.010841456,0.002942214,0.019523744,0.029120112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008844231,0.00048846274,0.0008794613,0.0008991422,0.0067929714,0.0039897836,0.0059082257,0.021026222,0.005554037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046147117,0.00006809106,0.0008136056,0.00007512737,0.000006554097,0.0021631524,0.013451009,0.0003695829,0.0010725143,0.31114006,0.66273767,0.00805659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011525921,0.000018687855,0.0009845893,0.00009062173,0.000003914032,0.00018608672,0.0045937416,0.00022666769,0.00037124855,0.0072219325,0.9862618,0.000029236391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11428422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20056663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11428422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010333897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009164893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.227238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161309311","doi":"10.7202/1125049ar","title":"Security of Tenure in Foreclosure Proceedings: The Judicial Role when Borrowers are Absent or Self-Represented","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; Fair Housing Act; Government (linguistics); Adversarial system; Consistency (knowledge bases); Security interest; Balance (ability); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.019482780086007144,"score_gpt":0.30902905460111485,"score_spread":0.2895462745151077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161309311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75214386,0.0068333093,0.015167896,0.04873194,0.0009330153,0.00019361771,0.000059432492,0.00008294366,0.17585394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98785025,0.00072730484,0.0016369222,0.0032364947,0.00015849607,0.000036971815,0.000012380793,0.000012130738,0.0063289665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98501575,0.0071661104,0.00071955397,0.0014917762,0.0027167276,0.0028901163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98026556,0.013315789,0.0021198108,0.0009380714,0.0018721008,0.0014886837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016028885,0.00021203957,0.00037005113,0.0011909402,0.0206567,0.013285372,0.0020085338,0.007754227,0.0017479357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04517928,0.00046039867,0.00053573994,0.0008443427,0.017976165,0.0069794892,0.0058423537,0.008421582,0.00024213124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013513357,0.00024318938,0.0450009,0.00025227212,0.000052046686,0.010608874,0.29779264,0.0010735668,0.0074318256,0.5246491,0.023117056,0.08964348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012619716,0.0006879682,0.10970389,0.0015253237,0.00028442143,0.006738621,0.315794,0.004581285,0.009977578,0.20730105,0.3427699,0.000509826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027730657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09281431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027730657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008695554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013260236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084769845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W839321378","doi":"10.1890/11-0306.1","title":"Economic-Based Projections of Future Land-Use Under Alternative Economic Policy Scenarios in the Conterminous U.S.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land use; Natural resource economics; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Environmental resource management; Economic model; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.03490956156038192,"score_gpt":0.281867260074683,"score_spread":0.24695769851430108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W839321378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99312943,0.00009759929,0.0019497941,0.0004212493,0.000007088547,0.000013504141,0.0016612129,0.00003444374,0.0026855245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676573,0.000091834845,0.0013902583,0.0000341046,0.0000023311152,0.000019488,0.001148683,0.0000048501047,0.0005427084],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980503,0.000089398956,0.000010090192,0.000035816767,0.00002797359,0.000031671036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994981,0.0002574421,0.000085679145,0.000021342566,0.000089322944,0.000048047437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006956049,0.00031052524,0.0001975081,0.00069302693,0.00025928256,0.00068090594,0.00040661398,0.0005667379,0.0015840046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016548693,0.00026645017,0.00047392453,0.0010817152,0.0003137516,0.00068373984,0.00032548115,0.0004298546,0.00018845807],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006908303,0.000035110046,0.04102234,0.000015097837,0.00003195575,0.0000929768,0.000052485273,0.9528833,0.0002042438,0.0028137949,0.00080573565,0.001973776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022887689,0.000045707435,0.037387937,0.000013398151,0.00002551753,0.000039921826,0.00031368562,0.9580861,0.00019216756,0.0025587154,0.0012947883,0.000019123197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12167646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13221999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12167646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030729992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085611356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24193645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}