{"meta":{"query_hash":"2ca9567f1ae6","filters":{"topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine"},"cohort_total":229,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":229,"exported":229,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2ca9567f1ae6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Property+Rights+and+Legal+Doctrine"},"results":[{"id":"W1137899428","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Environmental Law Without Congress","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Legislation; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01116708696339102,"score_gpt":0.2495980772184167,"score_spread":0.23843099025502568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1137899428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01957646,0.000027366787,0.00024996354,0.020047678,0.00086672895,0.00010561307,8.8318455e-7,0.00010156105,0.9590238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87415975,0.000012801311,0.0002099742,0.000669991,0.0020128915,0.0000025671147,0.0000018666807,0.0000031136146,0.12292705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943763,0.00007191034,0.000063952066,0.00012491322,0.00016220202,0.00013937263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997976,0.000010775335,0.000016085794,0.000099228535,0.000006065241,0.000070247326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002444201,0.0000440457,0.000062361214,0.0000089154955,0.0003490228,0.000056295896,0.00009935967,0.000029990786,0.006594279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011722524,0.000027801216,0.000020357393,0.00002938396,0.00032018518,0.00017180206,0.000016850188,0.000050337047,0.000583145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005138639,0.000025359288,0.0005953094,6.9510236e-7,0.0000043560767,3.4161707e-7,0.00047383635,8.916555e-7,0.00027771905,0.98280007,0.009546911,0.0062693534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010614643,0.000020109592,0.00019690262,6.7194185e-7,0.0000028111026,7.010424e-7,0.00014345416,0.000024550598,0.0006548978,0.001564739,0.99722326,0.00006176495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020433993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017734681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002636023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008410228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99431384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1178932211","doi":"","title":"Dissolving Condominium, Private Takings, and the Nature of Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Property (philosophy); Legislature; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Property rights; Property law; Private property; Political science; Business; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.02324628406985408,"score_gpt":0.278367712791918,"score_spread":0.25512142872206395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1178932211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50780576,0.007190218,0.000035505498,0.027348964,0.0012298715,0.0018190196,0.000016702712,0.00017366787,0.45438027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989783,0.00011475092,0.00024653965,0.00082574686,0.00032424254,0.000022957236,0.000001645268,0.00001033756,0.008670819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986167,0.00027773625,0.00022022416,0.00020471029,0.0004054867,0.0002751505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991146,0.00015605285,0.00012608066,0.00023342237,0.00015104147,0.00021880964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014923546,0.000115448325,0.00025567698,0.000020264202,0.00039911526,0.00016103554,0.0003767974,0.00013946158,0.00012091564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009743487,0.000047645874,0.000058217855,0.00017183395,0.0010347739,0.00036106832,0.00011657004,0.0003948112,0.00002632268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023878347,0.000031174244,0.0012591473,0.00001601452,0.000029199562,0.000005808694,0.003993753,0.0000014081166,0.00031775126,0.98980576,0.0030724942,0.0012287123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019085867,0.0000384457,0.0004080408,0.00004966466,0.000021032036,0.0000025421332,0.00044168637,0.000043104803,0.0007360518,0.0070638736,0.9891544,0.0001325682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012819065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004147343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003875216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014710145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124755466","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1195","title":"Putting Ethics into Environmental Law: Fiduciary Duties for Ethical Investment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Sustainability; Investment (military); Business ethics; Business; Capitalism; Environmental law; Finance; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty; Politics","score_opus":0.07829200082144241,"score_gpt":0.32889706847752354,"score_spread":0.25060506765608115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124755466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007141087,0.0019242935,0.0009811522,0.07082718,0.0012499063,0.00055504206,0.00001957493,0.000119156146,0.9171826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757422,0.00076525507,0.008327728,0.011851667,0.0013213939,0.000013850282,0.0000065485583,0.000020998546,0.0019503221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765766,0.0004463306,0.00036898212,0.00023530002,0.0007773879,0.00051435735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989724,0.00033022495,0.00015046362,0.0001377231,0.00006154713,0.00034761356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021972477,0.000167392,0.00022476916,0.00003402602,0.0060936054,0.00018666616,0.0003635124,0.00043761785,0.00037293576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018978512,0.00012305866,0.00017802906,0.00005417445,0.0011884368,0.00038946254,0.00007692133,0.0017891153,0.000044834676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026073767,0.00008534755,0.00008646856,0.000009896415,0.000034001816,0.000057426903,0.014759357,0.00001217421,0.0002596264,0.9822144,0.0014755587,0.0009796994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050586835,0.0001392132,0.00006904722,0.000040779178,0.000022043083,0.00012396595,0.0008485367,0.000049851635,0.0006562982,0.36240798,0.6349367,0.00019973585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08198716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96860117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002670768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027661875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99520034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1409821377","doi":"","title":"Environmental water transactions under regulatory capitalism: The role of law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Environmental law; Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008366319211789354,"score_gpt":0.18358449574521027,"score_spread":0.17521817653342092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1409821377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27910316,0.00060163473,0.000027068214,0.0014093195,0.00077062804,0.0008654962,0.00056250405,0.00033210331,0.7163281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6366484,0.00073475577,0.000049153317,0.000097365155,0.00014681065,3.5576127e-7,0.0007250218,0.000050521907,0.3615476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653536,0.00071713893,0.0003155596,0.0007219409,0.0009831768,0.0007268463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983769,0.00010672015,0.00028642302,0.0006619341,0.00010065519,0.0004673404],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002737068,0.0005225854,0.0006000568,0.00060766045,0.002652326,0.000113463735,0.0018230221,0.0007683407,0.003279168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000041771036,0.00042576573,0.00048014766,0.0005803364,0.0012799252,0.002920834,0.00028143407,0.000785584,0.00013595063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001583457,0.0010741998,0.0003069694,0.00014201904,0.0013165879,0.00047680145,0.14505349,0.00025337827,0.0028649888,0.8333518,0.00785405,0.0057222736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007750785,0.00009410417,0.00026672691,0.000060615406,0.00040986863,0.000002761462,0.102513045,0.000015447467,0.0031619873,0.003331844,0.8887638,0.00060470705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005724302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004943459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88090974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005099373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007803035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147545885","doi":"10.29173/alr157","title":"What Happens When Developers Can't Develop: Can and Should Resource Developers be Compensated When They Can't Develop Their Assets?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Entitlement (fair division); Compensation (psychology); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Resource (disambiguation); Government (linguistics); Business; Action (physics); De facto; Public interest; Law; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.060295699518503755,"score_gpt":0.30012555645986083,"score_spread":0.23982985694135708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147545885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07454192,0.03315129,0.000012262956,0.6470729,0.002253582,0.005401008,0.0001273296,0.00048237984,0.23695733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6085983,0.12370464,0.0072841938,0.18666014,0.0007450251,0.000490812,0.0007863486,0.0003945381,0.071336016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951224,0.00072714826,0.0009879963,0.0010379694,0.0008160807,0.0013084414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668026,0.0006795846,0.0003358646,0.0007663661,0.00073093554,0.000807005],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023842223,0.0007382935,0.0011777249,0.00009985097,0.0017837259,0.00081177533,0.0013822038,0.00042170926,0.0012719322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012722583,0.00048692082,0.0001380374,0.0007588713,0.0009129608,0.00092281663,0.000394825,0.0009849466,0.00007740343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006862036,0.00019636395,0.004649926,0.0014532331,0.0008241853,0.000121274854,0.11902938,0.000001065639,0.00043757513,0.64048517,0.08966532,0.1430679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037563193,0.00002688109,0.0007254612,0.0017258808,0.000111384186,0.000048337835,0.0010201981,0.000003436133,0.00017504767,0.00063377107,0.9941845,0.00096948555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2566252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90653783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90451914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027648787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002455721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485537388","doi":"","title":"Navigating the U.S. Transition to Sustainability: Matching National Governance Challenges With Appropriate Legal Tools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prosperity; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Sustainable development; Government (linguistics); Business; Reflexivity; Scope (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Environmental planning; Economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0403146735381893,"score_gpt":0.3014132238926715,"score_spread":0.2610985503544822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485537388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53367925,0.00028053691,0.0026731761,0.32754382,0.00010328283,0.0009138631,0.000007785634,0.0001792644,0.13461904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959293,0.0001418241,0.00065984635,0.0010016692,0.0002960083,0.000038129303,0.0000015565904,0.000007088249,0.0019245885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986089,0.00011690058,0.00013145406,0.00021061914,0.00066904107,0.00026310972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994116,0.000093675735,0.00004214138,0.00009926948,0.00028018028,0.000073154995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007142775,0.000089206136,0.00009960228,0.0000064336796,0.0011066544,0.000113305156,0.0002067555,0.00003757064,0.000074272444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011868203,0.000044818833,0.000035437562,0.0001832115,0.00018697404,0.00062674127,0.000019424933,0.00022563853,0.000014223017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058657377,0.00005997605,0.000025193172,0.000016147145,0.0000151950235,0.000024171179,0.07312091,0.0006307167,0.000041096977,0.86964804,0.00017342066,0.05618651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012497135,0.00044844017,0.015763963,0.00021490936,0.000024162126,0.00010202803,0.05834411,0.00060485356,0.0007134649,0.060819242,0.8606999,0.0010152142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00944112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045502167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8605265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020663264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037554212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489176446","doi":"","title":"New Owners in Their Own Land: Minerals and Inuit Land Claims","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Natural resource economics; History; Mining engineering; Geology; Economics","score_opus":0.03599617318962046,"score_gpt":0.2811255292031815,"score_spread":0.24512935601356106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489176446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8997187,0.051855184,8.850826e-7,0.030154927,0.00023693619,0.000118019816,0.000022929768,0.000007108457,0.017885335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96707577,0.02279701,0.00020620617,0.00072738895,0.0008850798,8.163752e-7,3.112146e-7,0.00000571933,0.008301702],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991507,0.00007211914,0.00024002897,0.00008276999,0.00016425164,0.00029014246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935573,0.000050529557,0.00008008373,0.000033090768,0.0001074226,0.0003731302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005051484,0.000072045965,0.00025043185,0.00026245162,0.00024001593,0.00013067274,0.00012932764,0.000045812663,0.00010257514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013028599,0.000052868952,0.000039547558,0.00024969305,0.00012878704,0.00027719184,0.000013764576,0.00017125755,0.0000026818232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021875047,0.000018748155,0.029251607,0.000011119205,0.00016079636,0.000908097,0.035360258,0.000020561523,0.000015199636,0.0010788428,0.18926144,0.7438915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053800666,0.00003654866,0.023708275,0.00016065806,0.000010408895,0.00017309758,0.0023848251,0.0000014907132,0.0000055073806,0.0008018965,0.97207093,0.00010838285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7165018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7828095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019323846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063702185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2853861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500955749","doi":"","title":"Challenging the Sprawl of Big Box Retail: The Smart Growth Approach to 'Zone it and They Will Come' Development","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Urban sprawl; Smart growth; Zoning; Metropolitan area; Scope (computer science); Big data; Land use; Politics; Business; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.034828966307864376,"score_gpt":0.2381315928267977,"score_spread":0.20330262651893333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500955749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3704891,0.03350892,0.013820848,0.26060006,0.0007059389,0.001820566,0.0000032023902,0.0001193469,0.31893203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841018,0.008326162,0.00008729579,0.0003398369,0.0002873802,0.000008441066,2.681148e-7,0.000011316493,0.0068375347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975871,0.00023560219,0.00027092797,0.00016203446,0.00047582437,0.0012685528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994589,0.00007956707,0.00012117964,0.00014214007,0.000095972595,0.00010220422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035882283,0.00012786937,0.00017394658,0.000064912194,0.0014819099,0.00011263459,0.00054154126,0.000052437204,0.000038391077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008019021,0.00005748375,0.000061845705,0.00023790346,0.0001422772,0.00015618882,0.00006820518,0.00093140407,0.000010557568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032146814,0.0001499922,0.0009364081,0.000010131752,0.00023266523,0.0000015906347,0.046807762,0.000013401425,0.000069258145,0.8685681,0.00040865643,0.08276985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009483676,0.00035957832,0.0019818775,0.000076332595,0.0000848569,0.00020467534,0.031138228,0.00028905302,0.00016707706,0.03686431,0.927392,0.00049365126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000963747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072280336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92698336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028457222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049491244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503734802","doi":"","title":"The Role of the Courts in Shaping American Bankruptcy Law: Review of Debt's Dominion - A History of Bankruptcy Law in America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Debtor; Dominion; Creditor; Debt; Legislature; Law; Political science; Legislative history; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.01803228673400375,"score_gpt":0.2726189819555021,"score_spread":0.25458669522149835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503734802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11518952,0.1808101,0.0000061647447,0.018584395,0.00063278445,0.0020340898,0.000033883367,0.00006704741,0.68264204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98664284,0.009203724,0.0001759952,0.0028106752,0.00013239689,0.000032870536,0.0000018005904,0.000015624757,0.0009840798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973258,0.00065542,0.00077328255,0.00025833203,0.00058989343,0.00039727523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984634,0.0002442873,0.00056575524,0.00049307203,0.0001318066,0.00010168351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014152463,0.00016577564,0.00056562026,0.000044348413,0.00018609787,0.000018899225,0.0007870559,0.000065330525,0.00030496556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002473375,0.00009645029,0.00018238493,0.00044841887,0.0020217241,0.0003136478,0.00011349488,0.00034235732,0.000015247444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106814434,0.00033531792,0.0013724094,0.000338017,0.00003529728,0.0000031864531,0.0049590333,0.00003121059,0.0016151709,0.9379614,0.0024554313,0.050786737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031259801,0.000055127424,0.0010220746,0.0014053463,0.000017490438,6.663391e-7,0.00039853883,0.00004394945,0.0005115634,0.0013374239,0.99475396,0.00014129284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20780902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13288182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004564068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039429893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8829408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517884536","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1417955","title":"A Principle of Abuse of Property Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Numerus clausus; Law and economics; Property rights; Law; Business; Political science; Property law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027346069395236358,"score_gpt":0.2742834323283129,"score_spread":0.24693736293307655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517884536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.738026,0.0017550723,0.0007181677,0.00039262063,0.00023609304,0.0003124937,0.000002417763,0.00003329018,0.2585238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802521,0.002510724,0.00015143126,0.00001687272,0.00012663353,0.0000018466675,2.4595118e-7,0.000007929133,0.016932243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980445,0.00013269455,0.00030271962,0.00010218923,0.00032651162,0.0010913917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993692,0.000013169993,0.0002230973,0.00012703458,0.00018529002,0.00008222578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017648713,0.000079801146,0.00018628266,0.000075352225,0.00020503816,0.000010455354,0.00040133746,0.000060498387,0.00032040259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052196756,0.00003985713,0.0001050894,0.00019853147,0.00023428413,0.00023354698,0.00001734097,0.0005834931,0.000011955245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008233031,0.0002303783,0.0013250804,0.0000071739814,0.00008165266,0.0000021270394,0.007978165,4.2438666e-7,0.0006944731,0.98512256,0.00004196355,0.004433671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015637482,0.0013540373,0.0022303234,0.00010387939,0.00010164182,0.00010394249,0.0038771415,0.000026449452,0.014508243,0.37837932,0.5973458,0.00040542934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034966227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005998805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6067432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021538224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023274862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5285871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518645978","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Doctrine; Land rights; Native american; Political science; Geography; Law; Ethnology; History; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.040688476194232825,"score_gpt":0.2877428786015839,"score_spread":0.24705440240735105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518645978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433712,0.0012007051,4.1113165e-7,0.0013445063,0.00005301759,0.0004072748,0.00005017358,0.0000038376957,0.05356887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831684,0.0033286968,0.0000034752418,0.000048063135,0.000014774138,9.1739174e-8,5.541958e-7,0.0000012037992,0.013434694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936354,0.00018415226,0.00008902456,0.000086254746,0.00014921244,0.00012780662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995717,0.000077511235,0.00012081789,0.00012937993,0.000041569627,0.00005904982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001647094,0.00006196285,0.00019505815,0.00001368577,0.00017359362,0.000006362533,0.0002306613,0.00001229625,0.00004236579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019339877,0.00002714,0.000056721492,0.00027614244,0.00061366137,0.00009704675,0.000037098896,0.000082359446,5.433381e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045524733,0.0001753242,0.11395158,0.00019340853,0.00024668287,0.000038082115,0.0048019527,0.0000035968098,0.000018988227,0.85631037,0.016747892,0.0070568807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039856552,0.0002290963,0.26598245,0.00076974224,0.00005418898,7.9219774e-7,0.0000854132,7.446611e-7,0.0001487848,0.0013614437,0.73083574,0.00013301433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99170786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85494894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011545649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030853492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22610609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522070982","doi":"","title":"The Hand is Invisible, Nature Knows Best, and Justice is Blind: Markets, Ecosystems, Legal Instrumentalism, and the Natural Law of Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Law and economics; Mandate; Multitude; Legislature; Political science; Environmental law; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.007356384662353332,"score_gpt":0.2637705096628919,"score_spread":0.25641412500053856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522070982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54902375,0.3506414,0.000023818628,0.057306852,0.001671407,0.0011054844,0.000024796918,0.000030196607,0.040172298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95806456,0.03378531,0.000005166572,0.0008837271,0.0006338838,0.000003177833,9.722504e-7,0.000008685555,0.006614508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728453,0.00045873725,0.00037681792,0.00019995605,0.0005226567,0.001157277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991651,0.00015349913,0.00026651626,0.00016374527,0.00014327682,0.000107842934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003641897,0.00017614708,0.0002794521,0.00005188408,0.0024268322,0.00082213175,0.00042877407,0.00016457758,0.000010157241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006530423,0.00008013716,0.0000837273,0.00020460879,0.000690274,0.00046668033,0.000044142074,0.002025883,0.000002175193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038888046,0.000023563925,0.000028068456,0.000017445645,0.00012654888,0.0000025179288,0.00183056,3.549465e-7,0.00006198976,0.9889022,0.0011687548,0.00744908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040938375,0.00038733863,0.00009153959,0.00017430868,0.0002911233,0.0006961381,0.015374303,0.0005766718,0.00020478941,0.044212148,0.93359303,0.00030475645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057506235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018675309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9446901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023374989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008223496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526106016","doi":"","title":"Local Climate Change Law: Environmental Regulation in Cities and Other Localities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Climate governance; Local government; Indigenous; Corporate governance; Political science; Political economy of climate change; Environmental governance; Greenhouse gas; Geography; Global warming; Public administration; Business; Ecology","score_opus":0.022798857999407455,"score_gpt":0.19636250268650493,"score_spread":0.17356364468709748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526106016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010457341,0.0008660492,0.000023539236,0.00007371552,0.00017916964,0.00028585352,0.00021144346,0.000041150535,0.98786175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58817005,0.00016028558,0.000012373926,0.000038937207,0.00021480267,4.395809e-7,0.000037039572,0.000015286927,0.4113508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888843,0.000057102112,0.00015383583,0.0002497666,0.000362534,0.0002883263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948287,0.00004486606,0.00018327266,0.00015315833,0.000017364058,0.000118464515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012279378,0.00017533792,0.0002864997,0.00010170334,0.0003745007,0.00009821641,0.00020047583,0.00025677824,0.00014373916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002236968,0.00019004941,0.00009371958,0.000037113463,0.001512583,0.0012572418,0.00015330741,0.00016355864,0.000035884932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005007255,0.0003777269,0.0147062875,0.00055112195,0.00022709799,0.00030681328,0.07515466,0.0000075714543,0.000063869666,0.8670628,0.00572968,0.035311628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030847918,0.00007040078,0.0045245085,0.00023035418,0.00004200528,0.000008476356,0.0062610805,0.000027765851,0.000013107352,0.0020217672,0.9861469,0.00034514748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003151551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022362908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98041725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035325214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056366312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.774999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526265844","doi":"","title":"Greener Pastures: Decentralizing the Regulation of Agricultural Pollution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Legislation; Business; Natural resource economics; Reversing; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Agricultural economics; Geography; Engineering; Economics; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02805671331928468,"score_gpt":0.27494025672157224,"score_spread":0.24688354340228758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526265844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016770564,0.0005461007,0.000100349105,0.0026928629,0.00028812786,0.0003016404,0.000005001017,0.00004514932,0.99585307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082580276,0.00020163992,0.00006585951,0.00021881673,0.00100524,0.0000016517954,0.000032995616,0.000006656393,0.9158869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987791,0.000078011515,0.00024087788,0.00014537388,0.0005251541,0.0002314835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.00004705122,0.00018040476,0.00013086743,0.00015254645,0.00005498546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048555763,0.00012335995,0.00015960439,0.00004622414,0.0003831502,0.000046953017,0.00024275531,0.00024540923,0.0006686984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028468432,0.00005093222,0.0001227729,0.00012096557,0.00029211165,0.00012715661,0.00002609943,0.0001721029,0.00002253062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007976909,0.0000105851395,0.00001510835,0.00001031497,0.000030387406,3.7370108e-7,0.0018926484,0.000011884031,0.00013576528,0.8473113,0.14423978,0.006333863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006972804,0.000013493102,0.011548536,0.000054635297,0.00003222267,7.129672e-7,0.00026050484,0.0000016775028,0.00009672629,0.0046473434,0.9831569,0.000117493924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004765327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012543749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84266394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018958058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019906339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73217785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531883695","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1938745","title":"Re-Inventing Governance Using the Laws of Nature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.0322117716230404,"score_gpt":0.2924414276384237,"score_spread":0.2602296560153833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531883695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7300004,0.024770375,0.0017929478,0.0070302603,0.0012595953,0.00035848486,0.0000043008286,0.00005580299,0.23472784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383366,0.0023140807,0.00010374413,0.00011535917,0.00040810427,4.6711295e-7,9.6103314e-8,0.000007298523,0.0032171612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981772,0.0001455429,0.00018010502,0.00008911032,0.0003191018,0.0010889958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950564,0.000024299248,0.00023234323,0.00010673409,0.000089664856,0.000041322888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002305338,0.000068466834,0.000105309635,0.000017684937,0.0006358029,0.000032214113,0.0004354438,0.00008316101,0.00014299447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010559294,0.000037083264,0.00009489238,0.00018841101,0.00015340855,0.00023316615,0.000028047381,0.0015937106,0.0000029743799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019998051,0.000024997667,0.0010246185,0.0000018674809,0.00004253257,0.0000021239894,0.0033255657,0.0000017579805,0.00017222925,0.98977834,0.00005992033,0.0055460543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006812522,0.00025197322,0.0015746714,0.00013049453,0.00010063396,0.00009310514,0.023773292,0.00018151711,0.0022891937,0.7532147,0.21734804,0.00036111093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046273754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020386118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26383328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031319662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013785396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533708772","doi":"","title":"Water as a Public Commodity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marquette law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Doctrine; Obligation; Theme (computing); Public trust doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public interest; State (computer science); Business; Principal (computer security); Political science; Law; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.12089439144847657,"score_gpt":0.31460671234548176,"score_spread":0.19371232089700519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533708772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006198246,0.011573988,0.000006014428,0.03792308,0.00018434208,0.00045965417,0.000004983796,0.000120203535,0.9491079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74212223,0.08159992,0.00033521003,0.14197217,0.0006823844,0.00019241574,0.000067705834,0.000035535577,0.032992415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.00035749824,0.0002115769,0.00018564193,0.00025449315,0.00039597737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999395,0.000015982974,0.000039836177,0.0002917261,0.000082530976,0.00017489099],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00115621,0.0001074401,0.00025316735,0.000014328922,0.00043330394,0.0000711799,0.00041085816,0.000055319684,0.017009595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051637096,0.000055575874,0.000110831556,0.00012505357,0.0002705041,0.0003351126,0.00008037013,0.00014732052,0.0028128568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002405868,0.000054927754,0.00004627522,0.00021048274,0.000013334544,0.000018992318,0.00062243314,6.9672296e-10,0.0000060781954,0.9546496,0.031003254,0.013372204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059649545,0.000020106509,0.000023007628,0.00019637594,0.000020603451,0.0000029346158,0.000005414206,1.4290246e-7,0.00010032018,0.0060765827,0.9933698,0.00012503161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015259307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004415748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039529175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051055413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535343897","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1077","title":"Ecosystem Management in Question: A Reply to Ruhl","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Environmental ethics; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem management; Ecosystem; Political science; Sociology; Ecology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.011929284005226658,"score_gpt":0.26713440144796996,"score_spread":0.2552051174427433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535343897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007085418,0.067793936,0.00004797509,0.031720392,0.0002541407,0.0031229132,0.000024132292,0.00010475992,0.8898463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90206665,0.06324479,0.0009011777,0.009921119,0.0002625167,0.00026518354,0.000023631008,0.000021717115,0.023293238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987393,0.00020832692,0.00025386486,0.00025543853,0.00029289286,0.0002501835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996396,0.000012214101,0.000048790454,0.0002084838,0.0000018690428,0.000089084206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068477675,0.00010688215,0.00019934056,0.000021214453,0.00016446035,0.000032906853,0.00016527256,0.000024147304,0.0007028473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004531216,0.00008085533,0.000057803547,0.00013857773,0.00005431729,0.0001271228,0.00005988985,0.00006451148,0.0010825413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006720098,0.00019168701,0.00071312004,0.0004671325,0.0000108345075,0.000084945656,0.0001446994,0.000010038346,0.000033765034,0.97492427,0.010972699,0.012440077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009383573,0.000017756824,0.0011095274,0.00083749933,0.000014064133,0.0000014661468,0.00003252259,0.0000011539323,0.000013868141,0.000371123,0.9973798,0.00012739915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056381645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057990565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003093377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058790524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557764441","doi":"","title":"Expropriation and the Socio-Economic Status of Neighbourhoods in Canada: Equal Sharing of the Public Interest Burden?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Public interest; Socioeconomics; Geography; Demographic economics; Development economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.23862767094439927,"score_gpt":0.49371966594129846,"score_spread":0.25509199499689916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557764441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866261,0.0023938841,0.000030973813,0.0026585737,0.00041518474,0.00036332363,0.000014528025,0.0000039351953,0.0074934983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971562,0.0024264343,0.000010578708,0.000097618686,0.00014645244,0.000009746501,0.0000010032662,0.000010691342,0.00014128485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978122,0.0005664941,0.0006836282,0.00020229323,0.00039965534,0.00033569525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982381,0.0003953463,0.0008260901,0.00027233784,0.00013682395,0.00013131664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026560137,0.00012718237,0.00046766122,0.00016163941,0.00029636367,0.00047487897,0.0019585467,0.00005426959,0.0017890343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006138494,0.00006960636,0.00008184486,0.0003153094,0.00041860252,0.0011480283,0.0006469967,0.00026693824,7.520437e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015872257,0.000052957632,0.88979125,0.0000505095,0.000106198786,0.0000012137433,0.004179496,0.00012768694,0.002635683,0.07410573,0.0012553249,0.02753524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016941365,0.000011054827,0.936223,0.00027798495,0.00004485006,0.0000013669347,0.0022867364,0.0012370158,0.002290005,0.027676865,0.027975764,0.00028122764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9197983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85273623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06706203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039276265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012493002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560945108","doi":"","title":"A Regulatory Quick Fix for Carcieri v. Salazar: How the Department of Interior Can Invoke an Alternative Source of Existing Statutory Authority to Overcome an Adverse Judgment Under the Chevron Doctrine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Statutory law; Doctrine; Legislation; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.22619924120204335,"score_gpt":0.3938734833854143,"score_spread":0.16767424218337093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560945108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243299,0.013440853,0.00084294414,0.01580641,0.0006822117,0.013126542,0.0006959478,0.00012226959,0.030952917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958631,0.0007389981,0.0005460212,0.001335428,0.00012559,0.0002359938,0.000018129362,0.000015315685,0.0011214168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975526,0.000822151,0.00048913737,0.00035299902,0.0004385807,0.00034456686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832255,0.00016750394,0.00046881157,0.0005193072,0.00029224076,0.00022960352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912853,0.00022480516,0.00050758285,0.000021641183,0.00044150185,0.000031476673,0.00064264145,0.000051876894,0.000101353944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121446305,0.00011764902,0.00017261127,0.00020024812,0.00088234455,0.00027164086,0.00009724146,0.00016774562,0.0000013365318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002436119,0.00032560824,0.00019033284,0.0008141469,0.00020536107,0.0000054022694,0.04756435,0.0000018830491,0.00071058754,0.9417211,0.000547097,0.007670519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006095235,0.003337406,0.006115549,0.0015528218,0.00030435796,0.0000038684643,0.012240839,0.000020711932,0.0077375644,0.0021777935,0.965415,0.00048456615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011284685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031136341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9648679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018955271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045468914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562561535","doi":"","title":"Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Property rights; Economic history; Public administration; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03211227064352791,"score_gpt":0.3196289523413421,"score_spread":0.2875166816978142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562561535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013419356,0.0008985806,0.0002078056,0.008180178,0.0012567479,0.0007790222,0.000032214273,0.00008635932,0.97513974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26406318,0.0016877131,0.00007128478,0.00011116808,0.0020277915,0.000008227781,0.00004171658,0.000022357539,0.73196656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978627,0.0001511296,0.00025181012,0.00029705153,0.0005633618,0.0008739394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867547,0.00022169501,0.00036549065,0.00012293091,0.0004949893,0.00011941172],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090145424,0.00022392094,0.00029240758,0.00025245626,0.0011188706,0.00043080415,0.00030370953,0.00027396504,0.00017411713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009444953,0.00016078528,0.00010554116,0.00007491867,0.00034060428,0.00049802364,0.000030193678,0.0032678728,0.00003904935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059786376,0.00003314437,0.000038038663,8.4377893e-7,0.00018372103,0.0000036698293,0.004514574,0.0000040016403,0.0000055837245,0.9932057,0.0013749944,0.0005759405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003200878,0.00011069264,0.00025347772,0.00004883796,0.000039436134,0.000037030633,0.00044529315,0.000029652696,0.0000020907303,0.43752939,0.5610137,0.00017032106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048851934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113066636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55963874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030116343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029115418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572082001","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.303619","title":"Biotechnology's Uncertainty Principle","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0139419027844496,"score_gpt":0.2860678836544981,"score_spread":0.27212598087004847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572082001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52301395,0.01202144,0.010126756,0.039754335,0.0016687568,0.00068651896,0.000002986168,0.00053388125,0.41219136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714335,0.005980079,0.00009470016,0.00014154181,0.00021357423,0.0000027531883,4.2969424e-7,0.000009489661,0.022123925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969442,0.00020969393,0.00017041985,0.00015285639,0.00026871928,0.0022541021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958843,0.00002457651,0.00008141894,0.00013178805,0.00006769891,0.00010609486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028792024,0.00009690795,0.0001245216,0.00008777017,0.00089161366,0.00007489669,0.00033227043,0.00013724672,0.00026554402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029686926,0.00006649455,0.00008088766,0.00029891587,0.00020064622,0.00017713688,0.000015397261,0.0014634266,0.00009713577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007018391,0.000030051224,0.00019726012,4.96751e-7,0.000028622051,0.0000033936667,0.00022935691,0.000007845824,0.00011718948,0.98942155,0.00009320542,0.00986399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021910275,0.000084840714,0.000019878145,0.0000032392843,0.000007144242,0.00006403595,0.0013535426,0.000005044066,0.0001734178,0.2932113,0.7047641,0.00009433832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008811265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01146537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7046709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000997576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037905383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68576616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579452098","doi":"","title":"Some implications of William Blackstone's Biblical grounding of property rights for American jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Jurisprudence; Theology; Hegelianism; Humanities; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07677169333376033,"score_gpt":0.34130558788497706,"score_spread":0.26453389455121673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579452098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6404122,0.00023040932,0.008340174,0.0065386402,0.00038381107,0.0023912995,0.00005931535,0.0002480859,0.34139606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901969,0.00009276602,0.0038391808,0.00009337679,0.00013631642,0.000044748253,0.000001738974,0.000006793635,0.005588225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989576,0.000056739747,0.0003021678,0.00020245004,0.00021387273,0.00026717113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918586,0.00007026978,0.00017559352,0.00022024989,0.00022930787,0.00011874317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036817146,0.00008721349,0.00023773372,0.00017608749,0.00027206345,0.00001669741,0.0004019294,0.000045723194,0.00019018204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064851425,0.00004359045,0.00009832795,0.0007497453,0.0009881913,0.00038518012,0.000036898764,0.000058606827,0.000008680318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004361837,0.00026034683,0.0035163884,0.000019770117,0.000026248894,2.2427318e-7,0.0033191813,1.6770423e-7,0.0029346624,0.98286235,0.0022479189,0.004769097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008304538,0.0012190937,0.097270735,0.00008210279,0.00010571406,0.0000021177832,0.0010152827,0.000076163014,0.04951698,0.15791929,0.6913229,0.0006391336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022983298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038637407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82494307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033179742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001236773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581848193","doi":"","title":"What the New Liberal Government Should Know About \"Public Property and the PublicTrust in New Brunswick\"","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05605066347721069,"score_gpt":0.2880998511225479,"score_spread":0.2320491876453372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581848193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11175296,0.08337164,0.00018518933,0.7786481,0.0047043455,0.0023272084,0.0000017221759,0.00014232016,0.018866545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73841894,0.103746854,0.0010173583,0.009929931,0.010258324,0.000011035599,0.000002862667,0.00016492675,0.13644977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154097,0.0014574539,0.0022055204,0.00084665796,0.002321737,0.001627688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388903,0.0016026881,0.0016298379,0.00096268783,0.00078753085,0.0011281951],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066961544,0.00087211345,0.0019039271,0.0002614685,0.0017893168,0.0021478322,0.002413728,0.00040108757,0.0001324874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030757694,0.00041217403,0.00068914704,0.0013446197,0.0014935193,0.0036606807,0.00078264216,0.0020025712,0.000034580728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016972494,0.00088824425,0.017765751,0.00028028345,0.0017573909,0.00011824411,0.116821125,0.00014877268,0.000077738085,0.5089333,0.25233057,0.09918132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070052934,0.00054160727,0.0137832295,0.0009742134,0.00020013844,0.00013016646,0.0132032735,0.0001654782,0.000029898745,0.0025776706,0.9606938,0.00069523446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14579794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6555905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7687181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009655844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021524448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585106935","doi":"","title":"First Possession Beyond the Law: Adults' and Young Children's Intuitions About Ownership","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006829426263310092,"score_gpt":0.2487262750853927,"score_spread":0.2418968488220826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585106935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70725954,0.017373795,0.00097541424,0.1916506,0.0007238789,0.00079364376,0.000010117315,0.00017498198,0.08103805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859726,0.009249921,0.00001739661,0.00091250375,0.0008822443,0.0000024024444,0.0000027109481,0.000007047816,0.0029532132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978057,0.00014553015,0.00017971316,0.00016246617,0.00032305229,0.0013835193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954236,0.000042405285,0.000097562275,0.000117678705,0.00007483089,0.00012514043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014268057,0.00011732116,0.00011595688,0.000045786535,0.0028238785,0.00028149705,0.00032988517,0.000079021134,0.00006572595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006399637,0.00006018686,0.00007429743,0.0001841272,0.0002455682,0.00041301013,0.00001959314,0.001306817,0.000013741447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029503319,0.000041881893,0.0006905526,8.3770897e-7,0.000023678767,0.000001636732,0.002866788,0.0000018296686,0.000010507842,0.9809489,0.00028171018,0.015102155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010727319,0.00059777114,0.024459153,0.00009186236,0.00006443919,0.00033939868,0.005925689,0.000037718582,0.000023851293,0.9060173,0.061022967,0.00034708597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042368453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04434837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27871305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033569115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007353983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606613292","doi":"","title":"Specific Relief for Ancient Deprivations of Property","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Indigenous; Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Proposition; Property rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06401731565646324,"score_gpt":0.30354163663472744,"score_spread":0.2395243209782642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606613292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010784074,0.000183018,0.007171752,0.003238926,0.00022953711,0.0005991894,0.0000038956655,0.000047508565,0.9777421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9049765,0.00009433404,0.0079704225,0.00022588596,0.000075513446,0.000025261024,0.0000015224938,0.0000048974334,0.08662568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994335,0.000036082638,0.00012571173,0.00010628738,0.00014229058,0.0001561164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996476,0.000036078785,0.000030254769,0.00010739634,0.00012724134,0.000051414903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003941615,0.00003863938,0.00007215856,0.000026746522,0.00024462873,0.000020897001,0.000100407065,0.00002882977,0.0007090106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016198767,0.00001866605,0.000042026273,0.00017197334,0.00011673134,0.00009140121,0.000005887483,0.000026772923,0.000020435378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048380866,0.00007826089,0.00023549878,0.0000037430812,0.000003280562,1.4340895e-7,0.0008871633,0.0000023965756,0.001593392,0.9694301,0.024967099,0.0027940886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013952391,0.00003308478,0.00024035606,0.000003427825,0.0000019378208,1.3545369e-7,0.00019555175,0.000010288178,0.0052365097,0.0027856738,0.9913047,0.00004882975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057120365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004016126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027141974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011817323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7763169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1615100587","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Idea of Private Property: A Small Step Along the Road from Common Sense to Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Property (philosophy); Sense (electronics); Private property; Epistemology; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04045536146510969,"score_gpt":0.24250752604577605,"score_spread":0.20205216458066635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1615100587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98888683,0.00013972615,0.0038273367,0.0028031257,0.00044633722,0.00025531196,0.000013337828,0.000009007871,0.0036189605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707997,0.000556783,0.00021058045,0.000088343804,0.0003060064,1.6557239e-7,0.0000017658294,0.000008425061,0.001747938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961382,0.00227828,0.0004722067,0.00014946106,0.00067962316,0.00028222022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975665,0.0007743313,0.0007312431,0.00047650468,0.0003279885,0.00012342156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046553775,0.00016420927,0.0005752068,0.00019053183,0.00093999004,0.000059253052,0.0012072641,0.000055366512,0.00018116072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026097288,0.0000684397,0.00046710562,0.0011065196,0.0006013699,0.00027594023,0.00014182371,0.0003729476,0.0000066817506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02594034,0.0016615508,0.06719762,0.00010978802,0.03859584,0.0006676265,0.4650762,0.07359031,0.01442915,0.1939494,0.0021812818,0.116600886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011050791,0.0019298844,0.27105317,0.0006536976,0.035858713,0.00010839182,0.20371985,0.009905621,0.00058889115,0.024233345,0.4388824,0.002015241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118465304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17155215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43670112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018537484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022083953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8874049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677036363","doi":"10.14288/bcs.v0i58.1158","title":"On Uprooting and Rerooting: Reflections on the Columbia River Project","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Agency (philosophy); Feeling; Compensation (psychology); Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.0822073746875948,"score_gpt":0.3651381113061651,"score_spread":0.28293073661857027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1677036363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02572741,0.0000023946513,0.000007552507,0.005363636,0.000505592,0.0010508624,0.0000073901706,0.00006272705,0.96727246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36648092,0.000011698668,0.00033408188,0.0005438642,0.00024519826,0.00017249466,9.23316e-7,0.0000103233815,0.6322005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990472,0.00017939418,0.00011798161,0.00024464037,0.00018490886,0.00022588499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992569,0.00033312893,0.000055441607,0.00020072007,0.00008675775,0.0000670625],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007044723,0.00007524907,0.000095539894,0.000040781964,0.015868813,0.002808235,0.00030943757,0.00007185688,0.0011878969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000668673,0.000052470063,0.000034204193,0.000984116,0.00028577514,0.00018285077,0.00007854507,0.00045281468,0.000023835752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041696996,0.00021914594,0.00013141407,0.0000020252678,0.000033029024,0.000002637657,0.0063100546,0.0000038181383,0.00029261986,0.17666334,0.81378776,0.0025124562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019558659,0.00015670786,0.00040296794,0.000016715716,0.000011086797,0.000003558174,0.00090267864,0.00004692719,0.00006297663,0.009481534,0.98860836,0.00011090178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26933998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6011319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34075353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057514677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002810684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174695633","doi":"","title":"Equality and urbanism : an inquiry on egalitarian ethics in planning with a particular reference to the public consultation policy and the overdale approach to equal land-use opportunities of the Montreal Citizen's movement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Public administration; Politics; Redevelopment; Political science; Urban planning; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.20611867739244782,"score_gpt":0.37928041737897716,"score_spread":0.17316173998652934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174695633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8933005,0.000053327556,0.00004658352,0.0067711896,0.00007821083,0.0012575918,0.000019414423,0.00001738255,0.09845583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98641217,0.00008775084,0.000011415225,0.00020054175,0.00014065077,0.000013260106,0.000024246181,0.000011437288,0.013098547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950113,0.0027657638,0.00023526933,0.00040810436,0.0010892131,0.0004903281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788046,0.0009748036,0.00014632379,0.0003940713,0.000330166,0.00027420142],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038613048,0.00017361452,0.00026172056,0.00046246257,0.0015542848,0.00037928144,0.000553819,0.00020997741,0.0000022093839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007547975,0.0000924599,0.000038748945,0.0009504599,0.0010633015,0.00031169318,0.00014315429,0.0010373193,3.526324e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023187096,0.00010582883,0.005058024,0.000059875085,0.00007447348,0.00005673995,0.13533847,0.00006687387,0.0000599715,0.8562855,0.00006468187,0.00051085575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040525827,0.0015363934,0.44623703,0.0006166587,0.00012280238,0.000007557079,0.44662663,0.00028460764,0.0007121433,0.006172927,0.092842326,0.0007883403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4119323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40169793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85011256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003649441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001791837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834777629","doi":"10.21083/surg.v5i1.1337","title":"“The quarry proposed by St Marys Cement Inc. for a location near Carlisle, Ontario should not be permitted” : Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SURG Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Proposition; Law; Environmental law; Political science; Sociology; Operations research; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08482371175819023,"score_gpt":0.29118255700089946,"score_spread":0.20635884524270923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834777629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6607481,0.0023188698,0.00423534,0.27130237,0.016825207,0.0049582394,0.00009357619,0.00028551224,0.03923278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959262,0.00025768706,0.0006172557,0.0005916347,0.0031384637,0.000034196662,0.000030076702,0.000022337163,0.036046308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984606,0.0001884035,0.00030407283,0.00017520045,0.00049997744,0.00037176578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999142,0.000041445317,0.00016949797,0.00013673356,0.00036106384,0.00014927103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019927823,0.00011033191,0.00012811371,0.000036420097,0.0023189797,0.0003326131,0.0002560779,0.00006779789,0.0008052904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009012929,0.000064691114,0.000072465846,0.00013908374,0.00021939071,0.0004082209,0.0000213671,0.00034491371,0.000010720188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012300904,0.00049665733,0.0034282722,0.000025468491,0.00020958358,0.000017314102,0.061611917,0.000011635804,0.00090549496,0.017189864,0.67519253,0.23968114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035808474,0.00015302589,0.0009733709,0.000007200215,0.000026161279,0.000009574757,0.0012377261,0.000055279987,0.00044647368,0.00044459986,0.99616784,0.00012065082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06972597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13795117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3209753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047619746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000878526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834797527","doi":"","title":"A Case Study on the Legal Impacts of Corporate Sustainability Pledges in the Alberta Oil Sands","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Sustainability; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Asphalt","score_opus":0.074646981191422,"score_gpt":0.33936716133451783,"score_spread":0.26472018014309584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834797527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683589,0.00075607654,5.3430546e-7,0.023798242,0.00020851179,0.00041322215,0.000002430117,0.000005218931,0.0064568613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997618,0.00020204273,0.0000046741684,0.00031426045,0.00025082284,0.000021136719,1.03865055e-7,0.000008534741,0.0015803956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968816,0.001149435,0.00070095685,0.00015506559,0.0007301552,0.0003828117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996642,0.0013159515,0.00068614766,0.0002651643,0.0009994886,0.00009126603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039530224,0.0001950281,0.0005089314,0.000114542454,0.0007437854,0.00022298323,0.0005856505,0.000047981022,0.000045941877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023806102,0.00007577383,0.00015994623,0.00055168953,0.000713315,0.00060761214,0.00010437857,0.00051913905,0.000005060993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006708311,0.00449392,0.11079488,0.00015108752,0.0012268,0.009163764,0.7722153,0.000093972994,0.000111555055,0.067796946,0.022287315,0.010993596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020488251,0.0031180382,0.04779579,0.00013901138,0.00019282513,0.0007877071,0.8860156,0.000016307482,0.00008868687,0.004248218,0.05518534,0.00036367364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11243164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106522955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11380025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018506993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043435948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9097807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850908651","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.501462","title":"Loggers vs. Campers: Compensation for the Taking of Property Rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02604270437387943,"score_gpt":0.29128966900202985,"score_spread":0.2652469646281504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850908651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5987333,0.014040339,0.13772215,0.16584234,0.0035045936,0.005659696,0.000018263916,0.00028289392,0.07419642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603206,0.0008815939,0.00012924064,0.00011533036,0.0004654004,0.0000076089386,0.0000010086595,0.000007556161,0.0023602315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981863,0.00008074891,0.00021691159,0.00011117298,0.00030518565,0.0010996922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939144,0.00007235504,0.0002251709,0.00009397844,0.0001659638,0.000051100647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002097739,0.000085295535,0.00013419667,0.000046385918,0.0011992962,0.000071218674,0.0003409805,0.000055240223,0.00004257711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105052284,0.000035716886,0.00011622894,0.00015040598,0.00021091406,0.00024508106,0.000011163728,0.0005550604,0.0000058431806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009700922,0.0000481968,0.00006029934,0.00000383302,0.00008955754,6.709255e-7,0.003688785,0.00019585932,0.0003122374,0.97914445,0.00007480299,0.016284289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020961761,0.0006889283,0.00036931908,0.00006841926,0.00010108466,0.000055431858,0.006511181,0.00014942925,0.0008855435,0.68502116,0.30379406,0.00025925515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01045636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036104638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39729872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007703361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022969618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1861684145","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2026088","title":"Yet Another Function for the Numerus Clausus Principle of Property Rights, and a Useful One at That","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Function (biology); Law; Mathematics; Business; Property law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04267826229504205,"score_gpt":0.2826181477099428,"score_spread":0.23993988541490077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1861684145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91018605,0.045531895,0.010131423,0.012193925,0.0016337727,0.0023359796,0.000015293615,0.00009628009,0.017875364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96006733,0.0020366944,0.000037524125,0.000102115635,0.00057143375,0.000014996689,9.0396935e-7,0.000012173892,0.037156817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797773,0.00012035881,0.00016826358,0.00011325297,0.00029833266,0.0013220403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.00008732033,0.0001519272,0.00011661452,0.000078783014,0.000080439204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023036518,0.00010054351,0.00014792758,0.00003639497,0.0009946041,0.00004957101,0.0001868279,0.00007382409,0.0001632407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004259217,0.00004247037,0.0000795803,0.000098601275,0.00018243882,0.00035133236,0.000032210402,0.00043870238,0.000009422394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010054684,0.0003417786,0.01425805,0.000023251321,0.00058121467,4.0677614e-7,0.00617106,0.0000031284808,0.0014238673,0.93443775,0.0015384774,0.04021555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069583056,0.00029725488,0.0026840789,0.000017612865,0.000100357465,0.000027552815,0.000496763,0.000024323639,0.00057016825,0.03675261,0.9582057,0.000127768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015509044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010358481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004154253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048771917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76497906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19482909","doi":"10.1177/0748233709105270","title":"The Concept of the Anticommons: Useful, or Ubiquitous and Unnecessary?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gridlock; Law and economics; Private property; Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Public property; Political science; Business; Property rights; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.013672553701438446,"score_gpt":0.2627536908293838,"score_spread":0.24908113712794538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19482909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9168092,0.016964674,0.00011658274,0.05195651,0.0005969857,0.0005887825,0.0000019319486,0.000030234069,0.012935096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802407,0.008039208,0.0000058594464,0.00015069132,0.00025465988,0.0000036346405,8.587248e-8,0.0000064323526,0.011298749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804604,0.00026646222,0.00019942316,0.000087864195,0.00029465358,0.0011055398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993723,0.0001741549,0.00014315691,0.00014120106,0.00010416344,0.00006502813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012246876,0.00007907383,0.00011680523,0.000017335606,0.0014252852,0.00018165154,0.00053921394,0.000048738508,0.00009941404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016983811,0.000028715733,0.000060173028,0.00017250786,0.00059363624,0.00025143044,0.000056893427,0.0007951589,0.0000075512885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003134422,0.000038362286,0.0021696254,0.0000019968966,0.000088794644,9.161607e-7,0.0026380073,0.0000018374835,0.00014307768,0.9273936,0.0015352194,0.06595723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010328774,0.0005170976,0.008025366,0.0000604054,0.00006641408,0.0001810692,0.024625119,0.000062132895,0.0006968914,0.47974703,0.48470345,0.00028214185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00402369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022924302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4831682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014055606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001556759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976046325","doi":"10.2753/jei0021-3624460302","title":"A Review and Assessment of the Heirs' Property Issue in the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Economic Issues","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12920807898685752,"score_gpt":0.4290147021253737,"score_spread":0.29980662313851614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976046325","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021136611,0.9853985,1.5635786e-7,0.0075744023,0.00024412358,0.00054680975,0.000007633167,0.0000017014929,0.0062055695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006043898,0.996732,0.000042502677,0.00046516492,0.0005102382,0.000008701691,0.0000025434983,0.00000978172,0.0021686326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768275,0.0010052678,0.00087995606,0.000095549614,0.00014556797,0.00019088988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983962,0.00018293074,0.0010960796,0.00020388405,0.00006471244,0.000056193054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035262643,0.0001635666,0.0011240344,0.00010339867,0.0001243944,0.000073360454,0.0007404979,0.00008972034,0.00045168478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000628287,0.000052206095,0.00024439354,0.0001762146,0.00021648263,0.00021488589,0.000065618144,0.0004784393,0.000008033446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060456373,0.00021639524,0.00015844083,0.025803424,0.00044477332,0.000008782126,0.008896341,0.0000038042922,6.722852e-8,0.009214545,0.05905384,0.89619356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000629722,0.00003962205,0.000021028312,0.01088203,0.0004792772,0.000021731177,0.00025631886,0.000001915198,9.046384e-8,0.000098857425,0.98804665,0.000089487105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004076095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007382403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014702756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005151728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6161863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976445175","doi":"10.12957/rqi.2012.9867","title":"A TEORIA POLÍTICA DA PROPRIEDADE NA ERA MODERNA: ASCENSÃO E CRÍTICA DO INDIVIDUALISMO POSSESSIVO / A POLITICAL THEORY OF PROPERTY IN THE MODERN ERA: RISE AND CRITIC OF POSSESSIVE INDIVIDUALISM","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Individualism; Politics; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05241774594116107,"score_gpt":0.33858994964594574,"score_spread":0.2861722037047847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976445175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86208934,0.06526011,0.00091723277,0.039474156,0.00083541597,0.006900382,0.0015370509,0.0001574717,0.022828843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669987,0.0005453308,0.00037150428,0.00047356312,0.0005531827,0.00011001665,0.000016778813,0.00007332897,0.0011564357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894509,0.0041145277,0.0017792969,0.00086927303,0.0019167189,0.0018693213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557006,0.0013574673,0.0007598615,0.0010586176,0.0005340121,0.0007200042],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057396544,0.00075063395,0.0015075355,0.00038167046,0.0006239214,0.0006761719,0.001346527,0.0006081311,0.00026016534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025876726,0.00040858221,0.00032060547,0.0011133485,0.0029408946,0.0010402912,0.00042777677,0.0014955739,0.000019116997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022994385,0.0016064966,0.0055620815,0.0011110586,0.00020341044,0.000051802686,0.08352093,0.0000022765923,0.00024035429,0.89808124,0.0005655016,0.008824887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015890557,0.005148555,0.14560193,0.016529847,0.008005949,0.00096190895,0.085110955,0.0048607183,0.0020812515,0.609916,0.0973527,0.008539674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049720155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008046834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2881653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023252156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001224556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985426506","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1082","title":"In Search of a Definition of Property: Conceptualizing property as need-actions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property law; Business; Public property; Real property; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06659859312739655,"score_gpt":0.357058792937394,"score_spread":0.2904601998099975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985426506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108822465,0.002633347,0.00008969619,0.0014384749,0.0003178206,0.00051899266,0.00002899468,0.00004061894,0.8861096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956598,0.0008230562,0.0013275571,0.00009937342,0.00004703537,0.000017857408,0.0000025196002,0.0000050400135,0.002017739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984916,0.00026529736,0.00032805296,0.00020308763,0.0004087847,0.0003031712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945676,0.000037595128,0.00010866474,0.00012766285,0.00018763135,0.00008171198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042406854,0.000104034465,0.00024257838,0.000052922882,0.0001819784,0.000024396653,0.00018191029,0.00006634942,0.0002751067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002674797,0.000055610282,0.00006180826,0.00068593235,0.00059562054,0.0006015339,0.00002224699,0.00010348741,0.00002576535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012382815,0.00036698268,0.009481947,0.00008400888,0.000020193278,0.0000137956495,0.0047554024,0.000041996023,0.0010284602,0.97103715,0.00056651025,0.012479707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053872,0.00019705914,0.0004764672,0.00011413393,0.0000120794275,0.0000058267815,0.0073251077,0.0000073279452,0.0031590855,0.01803521,0.9699462,0.00018278153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01863207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055744005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96937966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013308629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004605624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98790294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001115075","doi":"10.7202/1027036ar","title":"Du droit de superficie à la propriété superficiaire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013696557716364657,"score_gpt":0.2390386277269556,"score_spread":0.22534207001059095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001115075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63455296,0.0023953663,0.0013086892,0.028434355,0.0011416237,0.000500993,0.00003138391,0.00022875443,0.33140588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8817618,0.0015419037,0.0006283106,0.0010000715,0.0038965535,0.00003972181,0.000014798717,0.00006966168,0.111047186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607563,0.0008000589,0.0005308831,0.00066258904,0.0004492783,0.0014815354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981835,0.00032292053,0.00013788423,0.00056687015,0.0001658706,0.0006229585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002513439,0.00031134865,0.00059640105,0.00011323425,0.0007349805,0.00031811994,0.00088043226,0.00060607225,0.0015401712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042342924,0.00037826464,0.0003439645,0.00069362146,0.00090099813,0.00052543875,0.00012761146,0.00074418343,0.0012018752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004368018,0.00046258295,0.008208549,0.0003466789,0.00006695385,0.0002174461,0.008114304,0.00011559013,0.00086646446,0.87388104,0.0057024015,0.1019743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079102424,0.00032403928,0.0052005346,0.0005006117,0.00016654038,0.00028638603,0.0006906027,0.011485872,0.00085452246,0.10123148,0.87762356,0.00084480946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074780113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021003233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8719212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087655854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005600298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002725840","doi":"10.1111/jeb.12648","title":"The evolution of respect for property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Simons Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Property (philosophy); Evolutionary biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1228399343557686,"score_gpt":0.4138418531958961,"score_spread":0.2910019188401275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002725840","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.510369e-7,0.99142975,0.0001826273,0.00095584453,0.0012600436,0.0005533024,0.00004504274,0.0000065043523,0.0055660177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007284417,0.991298,0.00036149446,0.0000076160422,0.0018561261,0.000018151657,0.000008227237,0.000011140524,0.006366384],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740994,0.0009271874,0.0009612223,0.00014039846,0.00026950895,0.0002917288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966228,0.0005870362,0.0013719179,0.00016864261,0.0011418099,0.00010779011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003084501,0.00015865974,0.00097151083,0.00016970704,0.00045149203,0.000016441138,0.0007141018,0.0003298831,0.000026840136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012179336,0.000057684327,0.00058677647,0.00028879673,0.00071030506,0.0001264642,0.00005279627,0.0003333096,0.000008100567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016200065,0.00008780008,0.00001164495,0.0005303336,0.00025822615,0.0000031344518,0.00016422397,7.8531224e-7,0.0000018245204,0.17440355,0.07795444,0.74642205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016668979,0.00049432466,0.000004635556,0.00071100006,0.00019452578,0.0000497297,0.00010060853,0.0000030915446,6.2677046e-8,0.012834859,0.98534477,0.00009571783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045972678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014745645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9073903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096909236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052500865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93134284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004621154","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v4n6p169","title":"Infrastructure Provision and Private Lands Acquisition Grievances: Social Benefits and Private Costs","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Government (linguistics); Business; Eminent domain; Population; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Welfare; Land use; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.016473301771170876,"score_gpt":0.24647523288658899,"score_spread":0.2300019311154181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004621154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995109,0.0007277674,0.00008023919,0.00065822736,0.000103700935,0.00023384453,9.0976306e-7,0.000013788015,0.0030725177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955628,0.00071351073,0.002521887,0.00012922262,0.00019577493,0.000003483894,0.000001383126,0.000008472495,0.00086348655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873734,0.00006808259,0.00033735245,0.0001350009,0.0003788176,0.0003434081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.000017994253,0.00027917052,0.000042307358,0.00035904977,0.00016078359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008436877,0.00012257384,0.0002075233,0.00013404891,0.000764688,0.00013877334,0.00014577701,0.00009818003,0.00006403323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005877344,0.000081135,0.000025207566,0.000178256,0.00013514532,0.00072951626,0.00010219958,0.00017956895,0.0000010206579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011003723,0.00023706122,0.056182202,0.0003697805,0.00021369544,0.00065377593,0.22746766,0.0000070142273,0.0004234929,0.4170988,0.0012648152,0.29498136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015452455,0.00029779234,0.47810277,0.00017317542,0.00003583006,0.000049422208,0.013903984,0.000007437888,0.0013614417,0.010538857,0.49362513,0.00035891435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008827547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026190732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4923603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029226262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003687227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58814394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022362068","doi":"10.7202/1012994ar","title":"What Justice Entails1","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Privilege (computing); Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Nationality; Economic Justice; Citizenship; Lottery; Mechanism (biology); Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Law; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Immigration","score_opus":0.044958323511076356,"score_gpt":0.33406043238739763,"score_spread":0.28910210887632126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022362068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23763496,0.009256861,0.0013695329,0.025373142,0.00487913,0.0005700548,0.000004340218,0.0004656947,0.7204463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809258,0.002946566,0.000581964,0.0037660627,0.0012256013,0.00001265578,0.0000028435218,0.000012552224,0.010525942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987271,0.00023862663,0.00011915615,0.00012251528,0.00020928394,0.0005833105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940693,0.000083130806,0.000041268628,0.00013260894,0.000051277122,0.00028475473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088259106,0.00009463482,0.00010611176,0.000036092442,0.0005277127,0.00020887885,0.00022945598,0.00019177062,0.0006660778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014132651,0.00007077698,0.000057388646,0.0001399306,0.00019089565,0.0010729835,0.00003491585,0.0002737759,0.00027882744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031237054,0.00011291812,0.003890264,0.000040649782,0.000029944253,0.00001675658,0.05238163,0.000008121099,0.0008085266,0.90312445,0.0076851216,0.03187037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012284948,0.000018045737,0.00092676934,0.000029660232,0.00003327394,0.0000048115953,0.010397983,0.000017918072,0.0009971859,0.0034624666,0.98381895,0.00017006972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003450991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008782847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001802386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008696033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7293085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031761283","doi":"","title":"Property in Licenses and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Property (philosophy); Property law; Political science; Law and economics; Humanities; Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02267648806104593,"score_gpt":0.31337960837058626,"score_spread":0.2907031203095403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031761283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0854004,0.00022027205,0.000015019296,0.033628892,0.000041560634,0.00016156786,6.966791e-8,0.000018396337,0.88051385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783608,0.00007523544,0.00006877506,0.0007198595,0.000043808446,0.0000026791513,5.600121e-8,0.0000020117677,0.02072679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953026,0.00014681979,0.000059550406,0.00006358704,0.00010404059,0.00009575365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976695,0.000092451926,0.00002555926,0.000070993214,0.000021039305,0.000023032482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073102815,0.000031825257,0.00008554615,0.000009770196,0.00012123913,0.000025527244,0.00009684394,0.000023109242,0.00004976851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011779009,0.000011612798,0.00001313552,0.00007166718,0.00050540565,0.00008912956,0.000023387276,0.000058219957,0.000005556796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031031228,0.000011254975,0.00022092066,0.0000058635196,0.0000019999964,2.8587695e-7,0.07505806,3.62737e-7,0.00011396416,0.9211151,0.00027963668,0.003161536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005467802,0.000025103487,0.0005216262,0.000022678216,0.0000039004276,3.5573748e-7,0.0025689404,0.00020282152,0.00035272958,0.0043117236,0.99139017,0.00005318982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11697669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009702882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062103586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001765647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88890344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039123807","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0006","title":"The Natural Law Duty to Recognize Private Property Ownership: Kant's Theory of Property in His Doctrine of Right","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Duty; Law; Doctrine; Public property; State (computer science); Private property; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012214894139636926,"score_gpt":0.21932444111470115,"score_spread":0.20710954697506423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039123807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15402257,0.0021375446,0.00007201949,0.0068943975,0.000592176,0.0008697645,0.000024610577,0.000036305762,0.83535063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97029895,0.00030758503,0.0005678341,0.000052765583,0.00012468555,1.8619967e-7,0.0000012177601,0.000006302346,0.028640477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812216,0.0005001252,0.00035681154,0.00017147142,0.00049569964,0.00035370764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988799,0.000115476214,0.00032643808,0.00019585711,0.0003588256,0.00012351784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015879781,0.00013156747,0.00032416056,0.000035440524,0.00082881405,0.000037838672,0.0007711616,0.00008661389,0.0006469464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067582696,0.000057652836,0.0001583302,0.00012762398,0.0008804207,0.0006741668,0.0001120362,0.00025616592,0.0000035544813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019026026,0.000403512,0.0009953722,0.000043090542,0.00011361722,0.00006972117,0.008161665,0.000024992623,0.003544317,0.96269244,0.0032449157,0.018803762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011169827,0.00021704065,0.00248234,0.0001478124,0.00004059086,0.000008418867,0.0022160928,0.00001903279,0.0023717259,0.00410388,0.98708713,0.00018894067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41349953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69049877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98384225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003805753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016243303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70836097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057420653","doi":"10.7202/039836ar","title":"The Moral Paradox of Adverse Possession: Sovereignty and Revolution in Property Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Morality; Positivism; Analogy; Virtue; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Politics; Philosophy; Land tenure; Epistemology; Land law","score_opus":0.02453393702755719,"score_gpt":0.2797557446958232,"score_spread":0.255221807668266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057420653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09229116,0.00020893665,0.0000019304505,0.00365227,0.00066651474,0.00021752475,0.000008462496,0.000016521586,0.9029367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986573,0.00019424515,0.0001414131,0.00010374422,0.00019587741,0.0000019360164,2.8653398e-7,0.000004435739,0.0007007832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989895,0.00015677018,0.00023490611,0.00009956406,0.00028530427,0.00023393583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995204,0.000045494657,0.0001158912,0.00010389379,0.00009904718,0.00011523817],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010794625,0.00006990865,0.00012145444,0.000018004966,0.0032276276,0.000039072253,0.0001899304,0.00007389172,0.0001875303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006836815,0.000029056977,0.000044702916,0.00009905135,0.0005991439,0.0004127649,0.0000374757,0.00044486325,0.0000045142433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049317798,0.000034223955,0.00060228084,0.0000025006273,0.0000053834106,0.000012109629,0.00018061585,0.0000016294118,0.00021931411,0.99357307,0.000067904846,0.0052516586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048493734,0.00007495374,0.0023864466,0.00004127307,0.000009188536,0.000049164046,0.0003779877,0.00006259081,0.00035988583,0.032688245,0.9633676,0.00009775125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016029356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13827355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003653054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027290715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065245719","doi":"10.7202/042289ar","title":"Les droits de superficie et l'imprécision du langage juridique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Accession; Civil code; Beneficiary; Property rights; Confusion; Institution; Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Humanities; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Epistemology; International trade; Computer science","score_opus":0.013981165661697464,"score_gpt":0.27735332898496384,"score_spread":0.2633721633232664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065245719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7875934,0.00024519785,0.0026529634,0.009233008,0.00007547714,0.00014990316,0.000009455315,0.00017521039,0.19986537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679664,0.00029649248,0.0012164509,0.002090875,0.0005607249,0.000011356946,0.000008085868,0.00002070865,0.027828915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855644,0.00025835,0.00016939604,0.00022932683,0.00028335617,0.00050314475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999358,0.00015744247,0.00004560721,0.00017112946,0.00005124376,0.00021658537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012334338,0.00012995626,0.00016402667,0.00007554926,0.0007047041,0.00013530058,0.0003445004,0.00028354075,0.0004735656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022390607,0.00010679375,0.000098900986,0.00018912426,0.00030260853,0.0002581981,0.000023891616,0.00051008223,0.0001232759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034291177,0.00010155702,0.002158163,0.000011933787,0.000019454403,0.00006251101,0.028440552,0.000064199485,0.0023806486,0.90456843,0.005318658,0.056839623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033067705,0.000050812625,0.0043546166,0.000025967474,0.000017431576,0.000013725777,0.0011398108,0.0003661209,0.002356974,0.007928362,0.9831565,0.00025897127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008690624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97783786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007941878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025049128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081003266","doi":"10.2747/0272-3638.28.2.198","title":"Legal Geographies—<i>Kelo</i>, Contradiction, and Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Geography","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Redevelopment; Public use; Private property; Supreme court; Capitalism; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Politics","score_opus":0.007497949538879941,"score_gpt":0.23671727286907698,"score_spread":0.22921932333019704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081003266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63120764,0.00959337,0.00045925684,0.0033120015,0.0012975095,0.0006027022,0.000021602944,0.00052624557,0.3529797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956113,0.00063054595,0.0001613277,0.0007761774,0.0006440456,0.000006740411,0.0000069525377,0.000012339584,0.002150574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846315,0.00006406193,0.00023650409,0.0002955028,0.000368895,0.00057189126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992734,0.000071942326,0.00006583868,0.000172649,0.00009514791,0.00032098335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009226739,0.00015276934,0.00017489675,0.00040032048,0.0008983858,0.00019578687,0.00019250631,0.00012362064,0.00017489617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030808274,0.0001199691,0.0001368618,0.0007413946,0.0009141174,0.00039025847,0.000026399814,0.00018615006,0.000015332998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005550677,0.00011173645,0.2723266,0.000010336855,0.000104579674,0.000057372232,0.004960167,2.3310363e-7,0.00012811633,0.68991727,0.021343013,0.010985057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003469031,0.00005821067,0.104238376,0.00000829836,0.000023601197,0.000004594826,0.0005069163,0.0000022503662,0.00004927256,0.0021688875,0.89239717,0.00019550751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019850988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052093635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015863618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003622201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083230380","doi":"10.7202/1012997ar","title":"Citizenship as Property, Not So Valuable","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Nothing; Politics; Realm; Political science; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Corporate governance; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.056162576604918066,"score_gpt":0.3198307357513996,"score_spread":0.2636681591464815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083230380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124521844,0.00080853916,0.00017575508,0.014121016,0.00047159754,0.000440522,0.0000041189037,0.00027865884,0.85917795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932319,0.00032616538,0.0007121712,0.0061240327,0.0009418898,0.000033440858,0.0000034415666,0.000024050965,0.05951583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789506,0.0004334749,0.00018899674,0.00020723893,0.00038458116,0.0008906283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00009060459,0.0000616295,0.00021079642,0.00010283433,0.00040425037],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017835831,0.00015536905,0.00018574507,0.000056179113,0.0009809496,0.00020631793,0.00036105438,0.00029730742,0.0013409378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040697076,0.000093450624,0.00009582468,0.00020257692,0.00039480696,0.00028566035,0.00006465351,0.0004232387,0.0007424269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011986556,0.00014710936,0.009053332,0.000049687984,0.000080949634,0.000039378177,0.033375114,0.000015125353,0.0041617565,0.89510417,0.03145357,0.026399931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025865788,0.000059737366,0.0011174672,0.000034195426,0.000022502798,0.000014532589,0.0010620827,0.000037649268,0.005829274,0.018957905,0.9722896,0.0003163594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147029385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006259854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002443768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003331516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113519645","doi":"10.1017/s000819730000012x","title":"The Rule Against Perpetuities and the Law Commission's Flawed Philosophy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law; Rule of law; Perpetuity; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.015856616679670102,"score_gpt":0.2507193452691885,"score_spread":0.2348627285895184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113519645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022727814,0.00292819,0.0000018318004,0.14957477,0.00026935898,0.00018211328,0.000005085453,0.00003064547,0.8242802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589634,0.0037355665,0.000009542438,0.0055062505,0.0017870237,0.0000068731733,7.0492916e-7,0.000012086198,0.02997854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798673,0.0007793873,0.00024459357,0.00011200479,0.00048545952,0.00039184184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989982,0.000407503,0.00009412727,0.00026003606,0.00007809297,0.00016200688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00236817,0.00013634749,0.00017425572,0.000009252287,0.01226141,0.0009671108,0.00076380104,0.000050560957,0.00023732403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034134886,0.0000450164,0.00012843702,0.0001000554,0.00364338,0.00027227376,0.000059149177,0.00058120035,0.000063485204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015099882,0.000012781053,0.00000384006,0.000001487746,0.000032244447,0.000011245036,0.0040255273,0.000004694249,0.000009312351,0.9794748,0.0066415677,0.009631538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007155358,0.000021531772,0.000079251084,0.000026666723,0.000023481442,0.00005978812,0.0012082765,0.00006420451,0.000026731948,0.017168276,0.9805074,0.0000988827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004980514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015841078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043235177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006835591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126806701","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v2n1p102","title":"Commodifying Human Life: The Numerus Clausus Principle and Unconventional Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Property law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.1577617189360805,"score_gpt":0.4460581746916094,"score_spread":0.2882964557555289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126806701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17776577,0.00015253955,0.000015366883,0.043599363,0.00032638988,0.0007158609,0.000008187219,0.00005224109,0.77736425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93579143,0.000021160837,0.000060464452,0.0002644344,0.0005929579,0.00010348378,0.000009249384,0.0000066500056,0.0631502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976201,0.00039725803,0.00018905933,0.00022457125,0.0012161242,0.0003528745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877286,0.00022464004,0.00003679272,0.0001576825,0.0006330911,0.00017494503],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015819665,0.00007780621,0.00008521864,0.000067172106,0.0023907097,0.0006448096,0.0006776617,0.000062297055,0.0035728042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014684982,0.00003582272,0.000042097676,0.000140065,0.0010740999,0.0004537098,0.00024313423,0.00042126336,0.0004139962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009818985,0.00005959556,0.000895519,0.0000036273038,0.000031885036,0.000003885084,0.0005437128,0.0000010724486,0.00021623774,0.9935844,0.00368023,0.00097001786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022545378,0.000029511906,0.003383882,0.00001856034,0.0000016953994,0.0000021425155,0.0001264415,0.00025137977,0.00006842806,0.07698015,0.9188387,0.000073684845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12391859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014876095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012952143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013171289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129370845","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.467","title":"PROPERTY AND COLLECTIVE UNDERTAKING: THE PRINCIPLE OF <i>NUMERUS CLAUSUS</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Private property; Politics; Property rights; Context (archaeology); Political science; Democracy; Converse; Law; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04223924788035284,"score_gpt":0.2432543048598389,"score_spread":0.20101505697948607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129370845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0346519,0.00059376546,0.00015460009,0.00042584215,0.00011238811,0.0001642235,0.000003201271,0.000009667943,0.9638844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885042,0.00042639283,0.00038143093,0.000035565972,0.000040147686,3.4344435e-8,9.696669e-8,0.0000025500467,0.010609633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935704,0.00014461309,0.00009090995,0.000075402546,0.00019665026,0.00013539137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948585,0.000028582497,0.00014988345,0.00007730198,0.0001724365,0.00008596461],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037293354,0.000052790834,0.000121588,0.000009347353,0.0010460617,0.000015566962,0.0002738696,0.000044473287,0.00094589265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018191502,0.000028276121,0.000054634114,0.000036784815,0.00064350443,0.00035945,0.000057532943,0.00010267892,9.914978e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052805897,0.00023567473,0.003957529,0.00001686496,0.00021060873,0.000033814176,0.13184285,0.0000016623325,0.00029162585,0.8555807,0.0016954365,0.005605205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073102844,0.00027596927,0.008086464,0.000040955572,0.00006714163,0.000015922957,0.014803471,0.000018680239,0.00034256733,0.0034989663,0.9720004,0.00011843911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19954975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23107012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97030497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001606223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018945817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131571412","doi":"","title":"The Regulative Function of Property Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Property rights; Function (biology); Law and economics; Position (finance); Property (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Business; Control (management); Focus (optics); Economics; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Computer science; Right to property; Finance","score_opus":0.03633403168206132,"score_gpt":0.24026547571393755,"score_spread":0.20393144403187624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131571412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051277395,0.00023313967,0.00018404535,0.0009531334,0.00013961627,0.00017948697,0.0000016323154,0.000028480257,0.94700307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92219365,0.00012206196,0.0002454097,0.000004685932,0.000026693902,9.164722e-8,4.0071572e-7,0.0000018576443,0.077405155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994133,0.0001112187,0.000052318144,0.0000986765,0.00019150105,0.0001329671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.00002605548,0.0001073683,0.00014880743,0.00014548647,0.00005270453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025648015,0.00005049319,0.00010233394,0.000009544057,0.00067316217,0.000005135449,0.0002575341,0.00004978568,0.007780478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011897713,0.000027644599,0.00006133845,0.000051748044,0.0005380234,0.0004143495,0.000041257925,0.00004241725,0.000011665556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009599728,0.0001917619,0.0005983756,0.000017353157,0.00016850983,0.000005505268,0.29271597,8.268944e-7,0.0007684973,0.5674205,0.004547854,0.13260488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063985644,0.00046391351,0.27354315,0.000037767728,0.00008974412,3.2025252e-7,0.052127585,0.000070409464,0.00052973814,0.0034146316,0.6688775,0.00020539486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.704811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5190331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87091625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008698237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006810278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135936424","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000061","title":"OWNERSHIP AND SOCIAL SOLIDARITY: <i>A Kantian Alternative</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Instrumentalism; Normative; Law and economics; Harmony (color); Individualism; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Property rights; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06766350222503802,"score_gpt":0.28581791827382536,"score_spread":0.21815441604878733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135936424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060478043,0.00020927949,0.00024906048,0.0024328795,0.00036746802,0.00014788548,0.000006240561,0.00011838335,0.93599075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807047,0.00003786696,0.000106919106,0.0010987099,0.00058952457,0.00000483321,0.0000012186405,0.0000099760855,0.01744625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988449,0.0003396793,0.000110876805,0.0001913488,0.00020006558,0.0003131109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.0000466797,0.000047770656,0.0000856533,0.00004043156,0.00009458585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089295505,0.000097716336,0.00013053784,0.000039785606,0.00066947466,0.00010752467,0.00023188678,0.00008072025,0.00076128275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042077103,0.000067074005,0.000051575327,0.000086832486,0.0006610916,0.00037041333,0.000056001772,0.00018550752,0.00007179834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055503944,0.000033519056,0.00016115064,0.000004200219,0.000018041392,0.000019112642,0.026810749,8.9519725e-9,0.00007977222,0.95769703,0.00031533377,0.014805564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002863378,0.000045715435,0.0006730127,0.0000095185105,0.000019568295,0.0000027218375,0.0024607154,0.000004019216,0.00076462113,0.26924074,0.7262887,0.00020438683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043030633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083911524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92022663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023936782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006927988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8335512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156687330","doi":"","title":"Environmental Damages after the Federal Environmental Enforcement Act: Bringing Ecosystem Services to Canadian Environmental Law?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Damages; Ecosystem services; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Valuation (finance); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Law enforcement; Environmental degradation; Environmental resource management; Environmental studies; Business; Political science; Law; Ecosystem; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.0074543322649080765,"score_gpt":0.19861961660297528,"score_spread":0.1911652843380672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156687330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97211236,0.0018779879,0.000031142146,0.001659915,0.00032445445,0.000550057,0.00005867928,0.000030441824,0.023354964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99135923,0.0011244287,0.000025481642,0.0011408393,0.00050992967,0.000030443338,0.000010264795,0.000035688005,0.0057636783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954938,0.00021421794,0.0003471355,0.00034134803,0.00062036613,0.0029831135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990314,0.000017667886,0.0001231785,0.00025189604,0.0000033415388,0.00057251024],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013339559,0.0002889664,0.00020151178,0.00010614545,0.002255522,0.0002662526,0.00076821866,0.000104644154,0.0035253915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002401777,0.00019819273,0.00015563384,0.00006360783,0.0001834247,0.0005726348,0.00012761388,0.0010049829,0.00050828286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001275097,0.0013081222,0.11871028,0.000051352836,0.0019071078,0.0005659833,0.2385573,0.000118541386,0.007286124,0.519303,0.00047371024,0.11044335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010181231,0.0006365692,0.020186078,0.000052140545,0.000117282194,0.00040455046,0.06746752,0.00007890711,0.0006845335,0.0055894363,0.90273196,0.0010329302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13706025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67572135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045979195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058941427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2193824776","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0015","title":"Property’s Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0480782264763015,"score_gpt":0.3631084027986167,"score_spread":0.3150301763223152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193824776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040266286,0.00003509527,0.00069820357,0.010088272,0.00037513048,0.00019240013,0.0000024023961,0.00006373705,0.9845181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992478,0.000044423094,0.00013526763,0.00079035736,0.0004156992,0.000013150827,9.0369133e-7,0.000009794297,0.0061123674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987467,0.00016342684,0.00017103054,0.00021195384,0.00028847856,0.00041839347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919623,0.00008252726,0.000049659113,0.00048735124,0.000052602813,0.0001316127],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008617181,0.000103193684,0.00017763265,0.000019729943,0.0013017824,0.00041211752,0.00079236773,0.0001148622,0.003846752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061398087,0.0000547881,0.000047594265,0.000043966153,0.1265187,0.0004665043,0.00018712817,0.00020531744,0.00018504329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041956926,0.00004483559,0.0002568558,0.000004216831,0.000003845997,0.000018685472,0.0018480725,2.5600744e-7,0.000011356545,0.9949409,0.000371926,0.0024571395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002004201,0.00003279166,0.000060353068,0.000024426878,0.0000035609178,6.5811867e-7,0.00018629715,0.00002847433,0.00023416805,0.7583383,0.2407691,0.000121486824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074721925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003389781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056071054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007720986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207448566","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2225297","title":"Moving Backwards: Does the Lack of Duty to Consult Create the Right to Infringe Aboriginal and Treaty Rights?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Duty; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.011654216720585323,"score_gpt":0.2947338072525524,"score_spread":0.2830795905319671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207448566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296389,0.0009976067,0.0002266001,0.040147994,0.00020599364,0.0006430687,0.0000055467954,0.000028389039,0.028105855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844476,0.0015231345,0.00006464935,0.00056829036,0.00049587776,0.00001919116,2.9423282e-7,0.00000964945,0.0128713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973706,0.0002742313,0.0002942753,0.00019554993,0.00041169062,0.0014536323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990311,0.00019071894,0.00012623661,0.00020776952,0.00023118839,0.00021297151],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020480067,0.00015947386,0.00021909409,0.00007193337,0.0013675684,0.00028994403,0.0005737796,0.00005045776,0.00040818253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105684936,0.000056699948,0.00008258639,0.00031870755,0.00030990993,0.00032209101,0.000050243445,0.00082072866,0.000079522884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010740082,0.00007193128,0.0026423996,0.000006473933,0.0002049639,0.0000047865647,0.014209678,0.000016290363,0.00080923055,0.9619123,0.0021804948,0.017834093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005729305,0.0003408908,0.0058531025,0.00005592351,0.00007250476,0.00006593441,0.004422735,0.000030978856,0.0009021177,0.18765818,0.7997465,0.00027820453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027784321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05762776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.797566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033032853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001039723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220590183","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2738","title":"Book Note: Saving The Neighborhood: Racially Restrictive Covenants, Law, And Social Norms, by Richard RW Brooks and Carol M Rose","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.010147466980334726,"score_gpt":0.25355093099822923,"score_spread":0.2434034640178945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220590183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030751552,0.007775639,0.00069700275,0.019525401,0.0005364763,0.00043140267,0.000046703684,0.00007726061,0.96783495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888792,0.0011504632,0.00006872103,0.006133271,0.0013038405,0.000005681686,0.0000029479984,0.000022418179,0.002433462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778247,0.00049982435,0.00031817425,0.00027790555,0.00056416175,0.000557472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990236,0.00020729758,0.00023869172,0.00012574618,0.00014191885,0.00026270252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012337411,0.0002120188,0.00030380866,0.000031561423,0.0047938246,0.00078631693,0.00034739802,0.00018171959,0.0001208524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091634705,0.00012479821,0.00008696633,0.00009400505,0.0007547672,0.00065914815,0.000106442916,0.0006844606,0.000014447625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086455664,0.000056474055,0.00030878434,0.000009762863,0.00005568079,0.000020639513,0.010311754,0.0000016623012,0.00077366,0.9629526,0.014028288,0.011394227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010643594,0.00015305782,0.0010410774,0.000036943602,0.00007483772,0.00005400689,0.00058842887,0.00008799901,0.00014725047,0.027711619,0.9687235,0.00031692235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043901395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08249538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108590306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013148045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228162110","doi":"","title":"Holding Deposit Agreements: Pre-Tenancy Obligations and Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Leasehold estate; Landlord; Renting; Obligation; Business; Position (finance); Payment; Law; Confusion; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.032529383162635254,"score_gpt":0.29077886562680666,"score_spread":0.2582494824641714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228162110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6675364,0.0016573529,0.0002270013,0.0030516253,0.000630173,0.00053485,0.000010264903,0.00022861219,0.32612377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811855,0.00006386334,0.0008555612,0.00044569428,0.00046030173,0.00002320087,0.0000060893926,0.000009180156,0.016950613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986167,0.00012540777,0.00020584752,0.00027081443,0.00041661752,0.00036462137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990659,0.00003488862,0.00006568054,0.00020440914,0.00012912317,0.00050002744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043751355,0.00012428593,0.00015497864,0.00004387637,0.0009441326,0.00033766104,0.00024868042,0.00008861867,0.0002031248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010204383,0.000086176056,0.00004131749,0.00022977579,0.00022637288,0.00087065325,0.00007330909,0.00016153684,0.0002057971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024594097,0.000113770926,0.011895904,0.000013822304,0.000038889986,0.00003039696,0.0051235734,0.000010808778,0.00031486084,0.96945107,0.010436332,0.0025459505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071600947,0.000076892975,0.0049291314,0.00007300279,0.000029974535,0.000003967102,0.00028528878,0.00007038463,0.0006584667,0.035487417,0.95740145,0.0002680138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046572752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029916426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9469651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001054535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010025649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98778504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253276794","doi":"","title":"The Enforcement of Security Interests Against the Personal Property of First Nations Persons on a Reserve","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Debtor; Creditor; Enforcement; Personal property; Security interest; Business; Legislation; Law and economics; Law; International trade; Finance; Economics; Political science; Debt; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.020646841218818848,"score_gpt":0.2805618801163803,"score_spread":0.25991503889756146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253276794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6572622,0.0029715365,0.00021536376,0.15214473,0.0005572549,0.0010703099,0.000042573392,0.000036952606,0.18569908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98430896,0.0054949103,0.0000016960324,0.000045478424,0.0002051617,0.000008760251,3.9910674e-7,0.0000062521626,0.009928385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789417,0.00026474957,0.00025743962,0.00010774823,0.0005482581,0.0009276545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901056,0.00037389202,0.00020872368,0.00014616184,0.00020193332,0.000058748174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028631997,0.00009039137,0.00011531706,0.000056735225,0.001724447,0.00004650108,0.0005831699,0.0000427539,0.0001064766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053689483,0.00002694822,0.00014787432,0.00019751697,0.00049956626,0.00014679208,0.000044216915,0.00057788845,0.0000055585374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017202967,0.000116126495,0.00063247245,0.0000061950536,0.000161599,7.8096747e-7,0.016536651,0.000002125387,0.00014890451,0.9679569,0.0009426096,0.013323605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014756582,0.0014344921,0.00028058645,0.00039990258,0.000051923937,0.000021502368,0.043790966,0.00020165124,0.00076094083,0.073997006,0.87733084,0.0002545318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024473877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24216501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8939599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005985782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017214967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225544482","doi":"","title":"The (Virtue) Ethics of Private Property: A Framework & Implications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Institution; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Political science; Sketch; Constructive; Private rights; Morality; Politics; Public property; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030909351966628536,"score_gpt":0.3261057091789169,"score_spread":0.2951963572122884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225544482","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08110632,0.035914227,0.09412036,0.44492814,0.0019083257,0.0021913862,0.000008108842,0.00025063133,0.3395725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710472,0.016924446,0.00023961709,0.00024625508,0.00020323988,0.0000086669515,2.2329614e-7,0.000011276867,0.011319046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973337,0.0005496187,0.0002632652,0.000118204465,0.00037039636,0.0013647926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990208,0.00030164822,0.00016877691,0.00021058312,0.00020906291,0.00008911168],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061311387,0.00008634668,0.000116026626,0.00003322782,0.0022046522,0.000114140465,0.0004930918,0.00013414914,0.00003544842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016250001,0.000038541868,0.000093784125,0.0003307985,0.00033515636,0.00014889476,0.000018329696,0.002881778,0.000017881193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009195812,0.000029661796,0.00032831213,0.0000012181476,0.000040309144,2.1527272e-7,0.0012321933,0.0000018056874,0.0000912183,0.98754907,0.00007314316,0.010643682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006904903,0.000059337926,0.00009970372,0.000010304562,0.000009744779,0.000014759418,0.000941858,0.0000012550971,0.000054880264,0.5705046,0.428182,0.00005249528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045579072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039920867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8899409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036541824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055204546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262223792","doi":"","title":"The Trail Smelter, is What's Past Prologue? Epa Blazes a New Trail for Cercla","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Smelting; Prologue; Environmental protection; Recreation; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022328123499462997,"score_gpt":0.29088533248525666,"score_spread":0.26855720898579366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262223792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070764385,0.080166265,0.0051425467,0.8204524,0.0017777372,0.0021080477,0.000012228387,0.0001672474,0.01940916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8211489,0.04450045,0.00022459133,0.0017414942,0.007943394,0.000038582963,0.000002771794,0.0000372933,0.12436256],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599034,0.00016032846,0.00033903227,0.00024212718,0.00042510682,0.002843041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919444,0.00013361861,0.0001615267,0.00016203374,0.000119582386,0.0002287889],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027261942,0.00018271815,0.000204655,0.00005468098,0.0019869802,0.00086326385,0.0007086482,0.00012654164,0.00022010053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007485254,0.00010108029,0.00025255937,0.00019008595,0.00022992694,0.0010851052,0.000021243302,0.0011814964,0.00006946328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012292706,0.00005292296,0.000018298575,0.0000014617193,0.000101304,8.4738633e-7,0.006313261,0.0000032292019,0.000051605366,0.22934122,0.0060490374,0.75794387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006881707,0.00032592463,0.0000429596,0.000013337742,0.00003596963,0.000045854107,0.0057972916,0.000046185767,0.00009811567,0.12807107,0.8646735,0.00016164086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007803207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03752269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85862446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066744257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041171056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263093417","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Three Takings: Taking Analysis in Land Use Regulation in the United States, Australia and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Just compensation; Private property; Property law; Eminent domain; Public use; Property rights; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Law; Public property; Government (linguistics); Nonpossessory interest in land; Law and economics; Land law; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0354172027079544,"score_gpt":0.2889424336074119,"score_spread":0.2535252308994575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263093417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963779,0.00004232344,0.000118456825,0.001511119,0.00007900998,0.000056507633,0.000010973433,0.0000012091236,0.0018025236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993978,0.00001712274,0.00012223695,0.000092082475,0.00008279435,7.250661e-7,0.00001434277,0.0000019619629,0.00027094854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989598,0.00009338881,0.00034949023,0.000058411828,0.00044437897,0.00009453647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926573,0.00014857156,0.0003362628,0.000042350162,0.00018492948,0.000022182634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057455583,0.000049532428,0.00012445783,0.00023939049,0.00005212383,0.000081302394,0.00019024443,0.00002609589,0.00007751696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008085764,0.00003082635,0.000036326463,0.00037736088,0.00008842765,0.00027843122,0.00001072904,0.000111006615,9.94044e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058963917,0.000051728864,0.80870795,0.0000033176204,0.00007938557,0.000055787594,0.00073926063,0.010175377,0.000055136785,0.17969526,0.0002626394,0.00011517441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037116185,0.000018052282,0.9244629,0.00005403627,0.000030658033,0.000007742487,0.00014169235,0.0012828187,0.00003321088,0.0025595964,0.07098431,0.00005382198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17713566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010576679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008898447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12570621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264714780","doi":"","title":"Of Course a Land Use Regulation that Fails to Substantially Advance Legitimate State Interests Results in a Regulatory Taking","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham environmental law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Balancing test; Law; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Economics; History","score_opus":0.03886879061215617,"score_gpt":0.30399195804486606,"score_spread":0.2651231674327099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264714780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772963,0.010854069,0.00019846878,0.0029489375,0.00016141163,0.0023495695,0.0001589333,0.000058355006,0.0059739803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99042255,0.007964593,0.00062858715,0.0004908128,0.000023889503,0.000018743056,0.000028573302,0.000016104928,0.00040616046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983832,0.0001315773,0.0004656435,0.0003037498,0.00040326887,0.00031253108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992571,0.00003450507,0.00028697442,0.00029213235,0.000009575311,0.000119721364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006537678,0.00015460447,0.00033737192,0.000035012883,0.0001289665,0.00005074872,0.00020630684,0.000045617133,0.000113460264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043728076,0.00012210284,0.00008089055,0.00014005652,0.0002446845,0.00091833074,0.000064439715,0.00010068989,0.000034085402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002446698,0.0029272276,0.028024143,0.0041451743,0.00024881226,0.0005994664,0.023922287,0.0061414735,0.013670376,0.6978953,0.0011109711,0.21886809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020755688,0.000267257,0.1082829,0.009213537,0.00005755621,0.000010306065,0.000117067415,0.000012241104,0.0029404417,0.0026851515,0.8737322,0.00060578366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031351044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0154453395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87262124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025333624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044356584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8618862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268489386","doi":"10.1215/9780822376149-012","title":"Dispossession and Canadian Land Claims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.022225468123340877,"score_gpt":0.2573010534360088,"score_spread":0.23507558531266792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268489386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000047279027,0.00022228286,0.000010949377,0.0036897187,0.00018089109,0.000121950405,0.000008658295,0.000031929147,0.99568635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04105171,0.0005282001,0.000023902094,0.0005821675,0.00048820997,0.0000010354054,0.000011935763,0.000012492449,0.95730036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993306,0.000014937775,0.00009368305,0.00018402799,0.00016697092,0.00020980895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994241,0.000024726982,0.00003216162,0.000108339336,0.000036827198,0.00037382188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018557864,0.00011615591,0.00015716584,0.00007143338,0.00043450965,0.00011323431,0.000119293545,0.0002500546,0.0043516494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008760902,0.0000691373,0.000032551856,0.000010583521,0.00018187992,0.000051526207,0.000020336513,0.00015873356,0.00019312018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015132003,6.463757e-7,0.000099105644,0.0000046871455,0.00000603004,0.000007811671,0.0002006588,1.991112e-8,3.3138087e-7,0.96781045,0.011213094,0.020655641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005488493,0.000013847842,0.00011595951,0.000039941136,0.000009221779,7.4362384e-7,0.000008120182,0.0000036503093,4.3163396e-7,0.017553564,0.9820524,0.0001472445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62005025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9566013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069941285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029149727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294284428","doi":"","title":"Finger in the Dike: Oliver a Houck & the Environmental Movement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Scholarship; Courage; Passion; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental law; Management; Political science; History; Archaeology; Psychology","score_opus":0.009891462051680688,"score_gpt":0.2560042330479506,"score_spread":0.24611277099626994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294284428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93403995,0.0059844623,0.0006710094,0.02427168,0.0002809499,0.00044545313,0.0000013768897,0.000017419552,0.03428769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98858404,0.0035029105,0.000005455702,0.001661257,0.0005602043,0.0000031379943,4.8555347e-7,0.0000060419284,0.0056764623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732304,0.00020771679,0.00020174429,0.00010383456,0.0005046344,0.0016590129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996693,0.0000856205,0.00007626538,0.00011395829,0.000009178262,0.000045670422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069257207,0.00008612718,0.00007546825,0.000040518273,0.00080035196,0.000097279735,0.0005224779,0.000042683183,0.00018920169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028751687,0.00003744357,0.0000661418,0.00016067881,0.00017547705,0.00015039441,0.000026770613,0.0012982982,0.000046292767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008746806,0.0003026342,0.0082748085,0.0000010696018,0.00008199423,0.000037158497,0.029233469,0.000013110326,0.0004433978,0.8711405,0.0010094882,0.08937493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008140672,0.0002879014,0.03534769,0.000012768898,0.000029987308,0.00006739819,0.03844723,0.000018799145,0.000092000504,0.1529031,0.7717418,0.00023722764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023275046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032298226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77073234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008352853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050808175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309424387","doi":"10.11575/prism/33941","title":"The Law of Expropriation of Land: A Balancing Act,","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Law; Land law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Land tenure; Economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009932058654296683,"score_gpt":0.20434730641557103,"score_spread":0.19441524776127433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309424387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7758287,0.00017259437,0.005556065,0.003293782,0.00010049004,0.00033479885,3.468846e-7,0.00002401088,0.2146892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484354,0.00010206289,0.0015087322,0.000015048507,0.000010666043,1.4469309e-7,7.836116e-7,0.0000017554701,0.0035172915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994984,0.00006584945,0.00007651432,0.00006078819,0.00019976828,0.00009863606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957764,0.00006120832,0.0001231197,0.00009831956,0.00010354095,0.000036166526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023671656,0.00003322136,0.00010169138,0.000022439908,0.00024499814,0.000007309084,0.00021585009,0.00004216558,0.00018586329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024741032,0.000023399129,0.00004827468,0.00008204194,0.00028639502,0.00021505261,0.000041135492,0.000051860723,0.000009108679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012336185,0.00017088621,0.009978483,0.00007933186,0.00010979987,0.000003983558,0.053612337,0.0000010225909,0.011178972,0.5974689,0.0029966861,0.3242762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002339302,0.00035830087,0.15126143,0.00016125894,0.00011747743,8.099488e-7,0.0055273506,0.0092436075,0.007286226,0.025593169,0.7976766,0.00043446044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09691724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015791336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79467994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018978426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005748333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9090965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318756810","doi":"10.1215/08879982-2011-1007","title":"Shasta and Goliath","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tikkun","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Corporation; Law; State (computer science); Personhood; Political science; Power (physics); Multinational corporation; Politics; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration","score_opus":0.11932542431530747,"score_gpt":0.28424971596120746,"score_spread":0.1649242916459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318756810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08561859,0.00015268425,0.00001837581,0.0008150165,0.000080490965,0.00005845735,0.0000011018326,0.00005155724,0.9132037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710774,0.000060530136,0.0002211731,0.00018243422,0.00011251053,0.0000017379998,2.6284562e-7,0.0000027983717,0.028341182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965054,0.000022473283,0.000043453318,0.00007731048,0.0000785581,0.00012766608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998381,0.000005798139,0.000011808745,0.000057798406,0.000015054771,0.00007145284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013826034,0.00003246912,0.00004582355,0.0000137787965,0.00016084751,0.000022469825,0.000080497804,0.000025378979,0.0014785406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016704851,0.000021132571,0.000011251959,0.00005209607,0.000116538795,0.00010304484,0.0000202835,0.000038655766,0.000142825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016133235,0.00004847579,0.0032636533,0.0000042500906,0.00000921898,0.0000133282665,0.036714524,1.0224725e-8,0.000083892475,0.88948226,0.0055377795,0.06482649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111772126,0.000030643838,0.011442491,0.0000042579773,0.0000046632704,7.7428837e-7,0.00045420663,0.0000053848994,0.00010680104,0.009701614,0.9780617,0.00007570588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052966005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009907634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007901761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024309265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322773336","doi":"10.1093/jhuman/hus015","title":"The Justiciability of Housing Rights: From Argument to Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Justiciability; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Rhetoric; Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03724283223681019,"score_gpt":0.37549737422603024,"score_spread":0.33825454198922006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322773336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6908454,0.0033722192,0.0013407511,0.05953158,0.0068017407,0.0011125135,0.000014043703,0.00006248013,0.23691931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022996,0.00005437147,0.0054090912,0.000568007,0.0025965394,0.0000027016185,5.443732e-7,0.000010788544,0.0011279765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956707,0.0015010937,0.00091126346,0.00015555977,0.0012678644,0.0004935373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220157,0.0042380076,0.0015694463,0.00034523392,0.0012419907,0.0004037267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00743972,0.00016205623,0.0003394931,0.00009182312,0.0023481243,0.00025108643,0.000614273,0.00009792856,0.00030197427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00339739,0.0000788086,0.000150589,0.0002617884,0.00032029764,0.003612725,0.00007721135,0.00057306956,0.00005910564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022478146,0.004421239,0.00043673537,0.000030478088,0.0010341143,0.00016645221,0.085270114,0.00004151291,0.0032087688,0.8661174,0.029868862,0.0071565146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033223728,0.00025416526,0.00045155783,0.000053217176,0.00038893952,0.000019861296,0.0027801231,0.0000019264644,0.0012401792,0.010154135,0.984183,0.00014066653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012241161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00293217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031054756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019374643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328588749","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00201003","title":"Restorative Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Doctrine; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Alienation; Economic Justice; Public administration","score_opus":0.06563879200546957,"score_gpt":0.3746379273291859,"score_spread":0.3089991353237163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328588749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17030005,0.0007353281,0.00045273823,0.004764412,0.0006969786,0.00018432223,0.00000503911,0.000016789882,0.8228443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686027,0.00003611505,0.00078693574,0.0006174239,0.00053357147,0.0000015526754,3.1817973e-7,0.0000017723127,0.0011620602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986855,0.00030979465,0.00028804436,0.00007544728,0.0004249992,0.00021625374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986215,0.00007276462,0.00024275291,0.000069071364,0.0007872229,0.00020667796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030629538,0.00008851846,0.00024731804,0.000019088608,0.0003575711,0.00016153163,0.00031015518,0.000043090684,0.0006024511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028465274,0.000054920358,0.000080948266,0.00021836035,0.0004410392,0.00085903634,0.00002227262,0.00016249328,0.00029494875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038157737,0.00005695128,0.0001307363,0.000002128329,0.00003894152,0.000014077878,0.003010409,0.000021573318,0.00009616358,0.95531595,0.04080633,0.00046859586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044419625,0.0002390291,0.002012847,0.0000349439,0.00004864431,0.000020285966,0.004013583,0.000021846665,0.00021890823,0.07250611,0.9203069,0.0001326868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022204865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013101534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8828098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015886902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019358999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6596417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329572589","doi":"10.2307/4127184","title":"Restitution of Land to New Zealand Maori: The Role of Social Structure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.015474339492043557,"score_gpt":0.24312503019939233,"score_spread":0.22765069070734878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329572589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033494983,0.0004045563,0.000031581127,0.005631764,0.0002636337,0.0003106181,0.000039543742,0.000034791257,0.9597885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849778,0.000025525895,0.000073478106,0.000005587212,0.0003207709,0.0000011589284,0.0000016316693,0.0000034771294,0.014590574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993055,0.00006267471,0.00012757536,0.000098335746,0.00025221586,0.00015372814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997023,0.000025142816,0.00006315873,0.00009997088,0.000045119534,0.00006432832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013629478,0.000057847843,0.000115114664,0.000029997618,0.00020790713,0.000020120806,0.00017059155,0.000059821872,0.0007900185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004342571,0.000032219476,0.000041231604,0.00022388135,0.00018051032,0.00006735416,0.000018363358,0.00007308181,0.00001917948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017090516,0.00014360771,0.01103487,0.000026891625,0.00009002895,0.000004446856,0.38748294,0.00008602096,0.008596548,0.38271737,0.10182492,0.107821465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021859266,0.000055696783,0.0014317001,0.000011393396,0.000016105896,6.8820844e-7,0.026875386,0.000030353,0.0012110622,0.0068321577,0.9632205,0.00009636568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037211792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018140727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95148283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021740474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044758566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8650148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23452499","doi":"10.1023/a:1012660302764","title":"Property rights and property wrongs: Why context matters in fisheries management","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Sciences","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Fisheries management; Fishery; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography; Fishing","score_opus":0.052475750941143255,"score_gpt":0.30424191968408515,"score_spread":0.2517661687429419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23452499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13438733,0.00029145004,0.000015247499,0.23482859,0.00021686996,0.00082558533,0.0000026438777,0.00011853267,0.62931377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299595,0.00037451577,0.0002363933,0.008139379,0.00021462058,0.00004495577,5.738645e-7,0.000005900113,0.061024155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981199,0.00016387294,0.0002227827,0.00041016948,0.00046877086,0.00061449356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957436,0.000035604615,0.00005554304,0.00013587173,0.000035051755,0.00016358003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085336,0.00015020401,0.00018400225,0.00024289191,0.0010323924,0.00043871652,0.00049674837,0.000050863317,0.00026239417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004739353,0.000063438674,0.000031658114,0.0009404801,0.0019079148,0.0009305217,0.000104564075,0.00009879105,0.000049354963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015694293,0.0004789073,0.088515446,0.000115330084,0.000056905916,0.00023273146,0.076557055,0.000015563533,0.0001235581,0.43452185,0.12144084,0.27778485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002520986,0.000070036425,0.0051016333,0.000049884173,0.0000038929184,0.0000056412387,0.0019003135,0.00007246854,0.000026558977,0.008208255,0.98411554,0.00019365636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23962548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07579148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8626747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098930286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013206524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94107294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417581176","doi":"","title":"The Morality of James Harris’s Theory of Property","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Institution; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Private property; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013725030251273541,"score_gpt":0.2601528120084714,"score_spread":0.24642778175719787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417581176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.685531,0.035777446,0.0018865741,0.032078937,0.00072330283,0.0008003689,0.000010918924,0.00007848708,0.24311297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646209,0.0027539486,0.000015499238,0.000021826678,0.00026170124,0.0000017407026,3.558207e-7,0.0000058553137,0.032318182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997764,0.00041725862,0.00031378568,0.00008618936,0.00037572396,0.0010430604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993326,0.0000927753,0.0002327708,0.00013092044,0.00017348338,0.00003744546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005273538,0.000074988915,0.00015170065,0.000030392028,0.0006339945,0.00004125204,0.00042284164,0.00004819473,0.00005580235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012591145,0.000030158184,0.00011745664,0.00016135455,0.00050105376,0.00015810141,0.000022181319,0.0006083207,0.000003928029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066846886,0.000051711588,0.00090785505,0.000002585597,0.00003877773,4.1548185e-7,0.00047041295,0.0000036024999,0.00029871336,0.970316,0.00043383212,0.02740927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027148568,0.00014812921,0.0012057053,0.000013984407,0.000023191462,0.000010049313,0.0038136882,0.0000072692314,0.001061717,0.7812372,0.21212322,0.00008438795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010415257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013478671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2790899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022673202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022051036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99617445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487141959","doi":"10.1002/9781119205524.ch25","title":"Escheat, Abandoned Property, Unclaimed Checks: U.S., Canada, and Where Local Regulations Require","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Property (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Settlement (finance); Business; Law; Control (management); Operations research; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; Payment; Finance; Advertising; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.0178409165578839,"score_gpt":0.2512329108557971,"score_spread":0.23339199429791319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487141959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018962306,0.004283333,0.0001452125,0.005746664,0.00039276766,0.0005656128,0.000032407625,0.00020385934,0.98861116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014813768,0.00062186987,0.00018988599,0.00027262105,0.0010207061,0.000026170414,0.000023213133,0.00014442262,0.9828873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982972,0.00012730545,0.00021235937,0.0003365195,0.00050252874,0.0005240846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991893,0.000027825565,0.0000735964,0.00027923126,0.000060218936,0.00036980718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025517718,0.00026132664,0.00035172535,0.000078292614,0.00041891786,0.000091548536,0.00024920295,0.0003008393,0.0186081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027534816,0.0001375621,0.00004812459,0.00018184091,0.0004886947,0.00019519315,0.000067866225,0.00021864315,0.00005879882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008910015,0.00002858415,0.0001618036,0.000049330603,0.000056304107,0.000008614913,0.0003568553,1.9449183e-7,0.000007480816,0.02374616,0.95945626,0.016119491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026696286,0.000012789742,0.00011302032,0.000105790015,0.00003494436,0.0000024819042,0.00020607492,0.000014936051,0.000012638743,0.00007687921,0.99882823,0.00032527026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03937194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002134392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013822574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499888674","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316403594.004","title":"Oil on troubled waters: the consequences of civil liability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Doctrine; Forensic engineering; Law and economics; Legal liability; Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.03972099687914223,"score_gpt":0.23159920577891752,"score_spread":0.19187820889977528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499888674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035722743,0.000056913228,0.0000059612066,0.0009849599,0.00028169586,0.00018789289,0.00018633173,0.00007238913,0.99786663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037722465,0.00029206128,0.0000047352564,0.00010961626,0.0002032769,8.1462434e-7,0.0000038058797,0.000014593181,0.96164864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839747,0.00020458343,0.00020845012,0.00039743804,0.00047959018,0.00031249662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985812,0.0002620021,0.00025541612,0.00052514626,0.00023523589,0.00014103395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004639991,0.0002547489,0.00038523288,0.00007907043,0.0005615201,0.000048217244,0.00091230735,0.0002917463,0.00006194447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038462465,0.00014388075,0.0002511709,0.000010068155,0.00292732,0.00010724914,0.00016275638,0.0003198878,0.000025005747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015281388,0.000011272701,0.000001457086,0.00003315191,0.00007769439,0.00004085932,0.00045719967,2.6092732e-7,0.000058111662,0.9883419,0.0076360945,0.0031891384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035834554,0.00007004795,0.0000034991444,0.00021988903,0.00008627204,7.8228567e-7,0.00009775852,7.964276e-7,0.0004301918,0.00021935678,0.99827915,0.00023393377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028047734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020976875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022698255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037471091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251000183","doi":"","title":"Dismissing Bankruptcy-Debtor Plaintiffs' Cases on Judicial Estoppel Grounds","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Debtor; Plaintiff; Bankruptcy; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Creditor; Economics; Doctrine; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.19837668139470596,"score_gpt":0.38107136113705853,"score_spread":0.18269467974235257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251000183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122241445,0.00013770092,0.0002889548,0.013092211,0.0013145752,0.00024129776,0.0000053799395,0.00031862385,0.8623598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551392,0.000012859198,0.00030418957,0.0012773883,0.0012454839,0.000004849426,0.0000040574523,0.000011725963,0.042000197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855983,0.0001257105,0.00016695686,0.00024008448,0.00051975757,0.00038766535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992268,0.00010872265,0.00004332608,0.00016169003,0.0000924103,0.00036704255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046059806,0.00012484663,0.00016095815,0.000065681874,0.0006187507,0.00024133708,0.00023993677,0.00007065311,0.0007756162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039736895,0.00007944135,0.00006206731,0.00020746293,0.00024091742,0.00031393106,0.000039826256,0.00013414309,0.00038089952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001979202,0.00032227003,0.0010190066,0.0000070656843,0.000028243785,0.0002520385,0.01173531,0.000020142708,0.00008070945,0.7579274,0.15169294,0.07671693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036439713,0.0001488397,0.00044361493,0.000020108924,0.00000980384,0.000005149674,0.0012495306,0.00010779003,0.00010798336,0.00298198,0.9943607,0.00020010745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028783793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007683196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84266776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017343352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029463688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9776836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513169322","doi":"10.1086/423720","title":"Book ReviewsSerena Olsaretti, , ed. <i>Desert and Justice</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $65.00.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Ninth; Economic Justice; Download; Reprint; Library science; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07888899985329968,"score_gpt":0.3151188666197435,"score_spread":0.2362298667664438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513169322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001120517,0.42998224,0.0012617852,0.1070132,0.0018695219,0.0016121019,0.000052710086,0.00048589864,0.456602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010275296,0.6083132,0.0033603257,0.017843109,0.0017931281,0.0000045259453,0.000026747071,0.000045772642,0.3583379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.00024379889,0.00018116621,0.0003208392,0.00044598343,0.0004038483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998976,0.00012063199,0.00009663124,0.00025189805,0.00023867967,0.00031614242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010289,0.00016266272,0.00023809493,0.000021215423,0.0010205059,0.0001304236,0.00039549,0.0003249111,0.00025772233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006993246,0.0001273559,0.00005284301,0.00034060894,0.00042381336,0.0004660884,0.00009738691,0.0008752922,0.000032768792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004324857,0.00006290048,0.000049137776,0.00016855853,0.000029141038,0.000038133487,0.008534242,0.000015056769,0.000028336231,0.5327661,0.45367065,0.0045944555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004030896,0.000044372482,0.00005018435,0.00015412139,0.00007489687,0.0000021651686,0.00046789483,0.0000068009203,0.000086817294,0.0011914385,0.9973033,0.00021493017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009455315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001823481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013343792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012007584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2544670875","doi":"","title":"Realizing Rights Here and Now","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Utopia; Fundamental rights; Political science; Law; Constitution; Rights of Nature; Enforcement; International human rights law; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Supreme court; Right to property; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.012713618642905078,"score_gpt":0.2693101384833658,"score_spread":0.2565965198404607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2544670875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56940216,0.014910341,0.0046851966,0.076253146,0.00071908906,0.00038534714,0.000004342884,0.00021684404,0.33342355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95275134,0.01045452,0.00002828537,0.00006852712,0.00064488285,0.0000011381404,1.2805626e-7,0.000006608505,0.036044564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978946,0.00012247491,0.00013205322,0.00013063269,0.00023002081,0.0014902472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996312,0.000044398967,0.00006432187,0.00007220322,0.000056280045,0.00013157549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014430621,0.000079564335,0.000103497034,0.000046070134,0.0008286934,0.00008711568,0.00018015025,0.000058572055,0.00011803308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003973982,0.00003780669,0.000043442742,0.00008707746,0.00014800718,0.00036257974,0.000018831128,0.00044723126,0.00005457819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015911808,0.000011613007,0.00065553485,7.0549027e-7,0.0000270303,0.000004957066,0.0003222193,3.2359168e-8,0.00030271758,0.944157,0.00035423305,0.054148026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000363629,0.000089009714,0.00017346293,0.000025834834,0.000009071026,0.00007540799,0.00058359647,9.4613347e-7,0.00006458741,0.45670897,0.54180425,0.000101234466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016626655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0424273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004524123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009265537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610124562","doi":"10.29173/alr500","title":"Seismic Access Issues","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freehold; Scope (computer science); Easement; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08224893160894362,"score_gpt":0.36580324232032135,"score_spread":0.2835543107113777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610124562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001859168,0.1765604,0.000001938305,0.07211984,0.00014975674,0.0003165966,6.734768e-7,0.00003854574,0.7506263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22492583,0.51274204,0.000029896148,0.027968945,0.00046067638,0.000038590635,0.0000037559614,0.000015903162,0.23381433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897546,0.00015576782,0.00019300422,0.00018739876,0.00022026998,0.00026807396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946016,0.00008249817,0.00005488214,0.00024090549,0.000045142922,0.00011639102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002615035,0.00009909255,0.00024429767,0.000010909525,0.00035295353,0.00012877761,0.0005022358,0.000042453805,0.013089588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012165122,0.000062734005,0.00009011098,0.00024454587,0.00015736408,0.0004917356,0.000051383468,0.000089719084,0.0025807316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.146787e-7,0.00005540456,0.000096566255,0.00036583692,0.000018383067,0.000004844255,0.0006842425,3.23255e-7,9.967689e-7,0.74964267,0.21367656,0.035453457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048122383,0.000009356111,0.0000141414475,0.0005966421,0.000025210995,0.0000015236559,0.000003094914,0.000024912364,0.000007831456,0.00053937297,0.99860966,0.00012015442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11692825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026424276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7849331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024718964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014400462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610940184","doi":"","title":"Contracts for the Sale of Land: Understanding the Impecuniosity Defence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.11992804248137287,"score_gpt":0.34354387061554137,"score_spread":0.2236158281341685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610940184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41028795,0.0004361042,0.0114109265,0.13063782,0.0008276705,0.0057500307,0.00029170437,0.00025061332,0.44010717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875345,0.00018857888,0.00003786917,0.000039208055,0.00012516239,0.0000015519711,0.0000041521284,0.0000059088206,0.012063064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978617,0.0004362079,0.00011312585,0.00018793627,0.0008831113,0.0005179467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979256,0.0010152454,0.00007680963,0.00025845022,0.00048681645,0.00023712481],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033416816,0.0000819855,0.00014218161,0.00009090068,0.0017175117,0.000079847945,0.00078795117,0.000078913756,0.000088928464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005490694,0.000045848257,0.000093341674,0.0005189575,0.0011883813,0.00033043142,0.00017931797,0.0003372948,0.000010501675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038416314,0.00011952876,0.005164035,0.000017966271,0.000103630904,0.00007112609,0.011470967,0.00005134247,0.000049464616,0.958697,0.023285342,0.00058540946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018711477,0.00042967065,0.0057308576,0.000060835137,0.00006778637,0.000002805414,0.11438324,0.00026669673,0.00026835033,0.017878415,0.85876346,0.00027672396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036470756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004984051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002681915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080442964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612103955","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Private Environmental Governance Through Community Contracts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Corporate governance; Publicity; Obligation; Accountability; Compliance (psychology); Environmental governance; Context (archaeology); Environmental compliance; Harm; Good governance; Accounting; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025123600737146926,"score_gpt":0.29366033925029317,"score_spread":0.26853673851314624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612103955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88076323,0.0026739019,0.00061393564,0.0057510207,0.00048455913,0.00021345807,0.0000060575235,0.000041776853,0.109452076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748821,0.015848078,0.00004824682,0.00018703466,0.00051493174,0.0000019032055,0.0000011630722,0.000011550406,0.008504956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722975,0.00025395586,0.00019395081,0.0001077706,0.00038670993,0.0018278615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991362,0.000048541493,0.00035297294,0.00034593904,0.000016845554,0.00009951641],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025719525,0.000121116434,0.00016306656,0.000008256112,0.006864725,0.00039226023,0.0010453145,0.00007702752,0.0001374215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002085989,0.000089312125,0.000093837676,0.000023377555,0.0003954925,0.0012817564,0.000099648314,0.0025405763,0.00006536349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044152806,0.00009234393,0.0029889767,0.0000015037781,0.00007009644,0.000008293498,0.0032906237,0.0000028703066,0.00060174137,0.9596268,0.00009414811,0.03317848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012044293,0.00022740848,0.021652829,0.00004087985,0.000030067897,0.00008313665,0.0033632182,0.000015881647,0.00044894815,0.34642828,0.6261877,0.00031725728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010233257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017797789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6260935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012010495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008528423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618433515","doi":"","title":"The Decline of the Fish/Mammal Distinction?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Law; Sign (mathematics); Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.034261501589087084,"score_gpt":0.32402333145825246,"score_spread":0.2897618298691654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618433515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059763946,0.000022870017,0.00003624747,0.14493608,0.00071397406,0.00013251402,0.0000024941467,0.000018919012,0.7943729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8991196,0.000033590448,0.000012970726,0.00025359524,0.00023445391,0.0000019623674,1.0500185e-7,0.0000014495663,0.10034224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951553,0.00004747195,0.000081191734,0.000055713554,0.0001910347,0.00010903249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946713,0.00006242793,0.000076696,0.00031420638,0.000053149735,0.000026390595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004441735,0.000029592537,0.0000422496,0.0000026750768,0.003250621,0.00015946043,0.0006706052,0.00002128961,0.00025394367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039370218,0.000009670324,0.000045914865,0.000026338037,0.00060089055,0.00009820391,0.00012450035,0.00005418767,0.000012786765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020301832,0.00003525572,0.016607916,0.00000188585,0.00001407664,5.097511e-7,0.00078262045,7.304197e-7,0.00008098803,0.918457,0.0262928,0.037705965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006398802,0.0000066278117,0.07766004,0.0000023041775,0.000003344082,1.2279234e-7,0.00010336171,0.000023623827,0.00024009601,0.0034471066,0.9184261,0.000023277988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013889573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082010716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91500986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000096192225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005801517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737459881","doi":"10.1515/til-2017-0013","title":"Property and Sovereignty: How to Tell the Difference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Muscular Dystrophy Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Confusion; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Politics; Stewardship (theology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04499553625122221,"score_gpt":0.3274981946011386,"score_spread":0.2825026583499164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737459881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06898467,0.00009714495,0.0029042435,0.1470783,0.00038902552,0.00067463773,0.0000063511175,0.000056263496,0.77980936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933968,0.00006880022,0.00010052421,0.0015633039,0.0002480206,0.000019038813,3.936753e-7,0.0000067239425,0.0045964047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989191,0.00017795574,0.00010050952,0.00021568747,0.00024234178,0.0003443691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991603,0.00018606443,0.000033811863,0.0004366148,0.000042029435,0.00014121864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007262208,0.00010441811,0.00015529133,0.000014319885,0.0013601345,0.0007588347,0.00072692195,0.00007430002,0.0005082479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082061125,0.000041706673,0.000024405399,0.00005178471,0.077764705,0.00021352977,0.00031845656,0.0001812541,0.000023151244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035774472,0.000018507717,0.0004525579,0.0000037526584,0.0000031172278,0.000005104442,0.003776811,5.2277166e-8,0.000044656583,0.98944044,0.00019998774,0.006019234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017436859,0.00008274764,0.0011242322,0.000040821273,0.000006814612,0.0000012956008,0.0005720662,0.000036242993,0.00061875087,0.82705337,0.17012413,0.00016519125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005035402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055613875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92441213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002576023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003952631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752532644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1264","title":"Community, Property, and Human Rights: The Failure of Property-as-Respect","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Private property; Law and economics; Property law; Numerus clausus; Human rights; Political science; Law; Land law; Sociology; Business; Land tenure; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.043043714012098916,"score_gpt":0.3476722668467948,"score_spread":0.3046285528346959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752532644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5097533,0.00026519582,0.0000017638448,0.17833309,0.00006353084,0.00028626408,0.000004919846,0.00001811439,0.3112738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916766,0.00005310759,0.000020423178,0.0019229415,0.0013919394,6.1168885e-7,3.193042e-7,0.000004959477,0.0049290955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849147,0.0005404315,0.00032705523,0.00006409928,0.000356348,0.00022057931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931484,0.000041787112,0.00024394046,0.00008984676,0.00020405518,0.00010552685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010828436,0.00010715774,0.0002918119,0.00006669418,0.0029081379,0.0001682506,0.0003492304,0.000099608784,0.000028637667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004593442,0.000039305774,0.00009457536,0.00014002903,0.0010071404,0.00030972413,0.000053665575,0.0004938925,0.0000012299795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043045595,0.00012233488,0.00003089082,0.000011858198,0.000034805515,0.000006151257,0.04516815,7.177308e-8,0.000825037,0.9471607,0.0032857554,0.0033111647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005769996,0.00062173716,0.0012169933,0.000045928227,0.00003657414,0.000026890053,0.0017334907,5.09087e-7,0.00021949697,0.10260028,0.8928094,0.00011173078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015047492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044876837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017936103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752717888","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1265","title":"Revitalizing Land Use Law: Introductory Notes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.052099636497167146,"score_gpt":0.3443510968078286,"score_spread":0.29225146031066146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752717888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124123,0.001410394,0.000023986267,0.18407384,0.0005539791,0.00017858646,0.000010303633,0.000046637324,0.20129001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98439014,0.0003117206,0.00008506589,0.006564237,0.00801784,1.1951327e-7,3.629777e-7,0.000004114195,0.0006264019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991316,0.0001243782,0.00022440824,0.000070042464,0.00024073971,0.00020878538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995241,0.000050386192,0.00014799461,0.000041783587,0.00012551872,0.00011019995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004971102,0.00007150892,0.00020825278,0.000050320534,0.00069997204,0.00022013648,0.000113270515,0.00007335788,0.000018064293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013703933,0.00004838172,0.00008778928,0.000085346845,0.0002789399,0.00062463345,0.000012329223,0.00017317267,0.0000023942098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021209296,0.000029819656,0.00011125621,0.0000038132628,0.000013255795,0.000010436153,0.008555374,1.9465026e-7,0.00026137382,0.985342,0.0009890584,0.004662192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032230892,0.00010811366,0.0023916205,0.000021321874,0.000020879104,0.000010251997,0.00018072751,4.6029842e-7,0.00006535591,0.031722505,0.9650531,0.00010336171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018829355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017958176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96406406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060135284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013856431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98770434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763138432","doi":"","title":"Enforcement Dissonance: Lobsters, the Legislature, and Federal Waters in State v. Thomas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maine law review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Legislature; Enforcement; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Fishery; Law; Economics; Biology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04551994356527655,"score_gpt":0.2918166684997344,"score_spread":0.24629672493445787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763138432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007813633,0.13524295,0.000023283277,0.02080983,0.00036048127,0.0019641742,0.000009969762,0.00007102763,0.83370465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8511259,0.1289171,0.00009934317,0.006391144,0.00007661602,0.000047325153,0.0000043813643,0.000009451814,0.013328737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989883,0.00017757714,0.00020489153,0.00015876886,0.00017864355,0.00029187519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968576,0.000020632664,0.00005285516,0.00015361478,0.000019927522,0.00006720969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079688133,0.00010338609,0.00020158268,0.000007586082,0.00029124808,0.00006299343,0.0001996888,0.000024984894,0.00027704437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018039815,0.00004761009,0.0000437358,0.00012302463,0.00024273574,0.0001780322,0.00005565063,0.00012332469,0.00001796534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013607375,0.000030191268,0.00047803269,0.00027827764,0.00001249923,0.00002413077,0.006431531,1.0424503e-7,0.0000035541009,0.9705443,0.0035113606,0.018672433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013840855,0.000024712985,0.00084934436,0.0005305037,0.000008941468,0.0000014448888,0.000053360123,0.0000015185466,0.000009116401,0.0030308657,0.9952563,0.000095484495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012680526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065828254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99174494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034322205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027004864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763602987","doi":"10.15396/eres2017_338","title":"Railway vibrations: a challenge for sustainable real estate?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"24th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Train; Vibration; Real estate; Work (physics); Architectural engineering; Engineering; Track (disk drive); Transport engineering; Estate; Function (biology); Computer science; Civil engineering; Business; Mechanical engineering; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.04738103045847139,"score_gpt":0.32368262865753605,"score_spread":0.27630159819906464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763602987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016716283,0.00001784808,0.0011111785,0.005660005,0.00022003001,0.0009885567,0.00015743077,0.00029395238,0.97483474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8576462,0.052194614,0.001341873,0.00021817395,0.00084020424,0.00006728453,0.00008935678,0.00007337063,0.087528914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970131,0.00035990126,0.00041145465,0.0006338634,0.00046068954,0.0011209908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973244,0.00014022371,0.00036451782,0.0006077109,0.001117939,0.00044517274],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018583959,0.000310465,0.00034529442,0.000035171906,0.0048262132,0.001337746,0.0011595611,0.00012032334,0.00014097976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044075612,0.00025167962,0.00028458322,0.00011387805,0.0011612673,0.0018590123,0.0002932915,0.00032016513,0.0001110083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001801643,0.00029907128,0.00019487724,0.00020254556,0.00012562303,0.00019404908,0.19054657,0.00001327288,0.00009459589,0.29114968,0.026168158,0.49083138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010234372,0.00032132064,0.0019745377,0.000039042094,0.00003499293,0.000001451317,0.04309525,0.00075500656,0.000022042475,0.0011309023,0.9511127,0.00048932945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03296526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047694016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9249445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014243004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009071185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790353047","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's laws of Canada. Volume 5R, Environment.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science","score_opus":0.010870993592990914,"score_gpt":0.1965079187101728,"score_spread":0.1856369251171819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790353047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016717644,0.00032835093,0.000009314719,0.008425899,0.00032301835,0.00028517118,0.0002370454,0.00001658363,0.97365695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6050173,0.0010332388,0.00013892684,0.00038028043,0.0002719282,0.00001334545,0.0000046810933,0.000021258906,0.39311907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981323,0.00010274696,0.00037286224,0.00024380686,0.0005179101,0.00063039176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986503,0.00007569973,0.00015044973,0.0003229707,0.0000656785,0.0007348666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000350899,0.00015266043,0.00029972932,0.00019724274,0.00024538906,0.000013221332,0.00044659933,0.00011187652,0.0031561314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001262546,0.00010507744,0.000072858726,0.00016594812,0.00039392745,0.00017789137,0.000028843924,0.0000807746,0.00003093303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003974446,0.00006661423,0.022393014,0.000052362226,0.000116938536,0.00012653125,0.0027050895,0.0000056258004,0.0005465569,0.3887139,0.5177133,0.06752032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020640093,0.000032524207,0.006774647,0.000031346197,0.000014564042,7.621797e-7,0.00008024147,9.41432e-7,0.0001585501,0.0007961227,0.9917217,0.00018220728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99810576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58829963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004505535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003947916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801579507","doi":"","title":"Owning and Dissolving Strata Property","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Dissolution; Law; Confusion; Business; Dissenting opinion; Law and economics; Property rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03740769300889654,"score_gpt":0.30144146361700486,"score_spread":0.2640337706081083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801579507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22419362,0.0006509052,0.000033272125,0.00963965,0.0005105575,0.0003805709,0.000009640539,0.00016414083,0.76441765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587895,0.00013410796,0.00035210475,0.00029906927,0.00057134836,0.000009076289,0.0000017135919,0.0000112539565,0.03983177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882656,0.000078514204,0.00014634171,0.00028816186,0.00027550024,0.00038494042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909645,0.000029520073,0.00009708802,0.0004307348,0.00005807193,0.0002881493],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005807686,0.00011719077,0.00016134167,0.000017209797,0.003554202,0.0012975122,0.0005330702,0.00008206974,0.0005358325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003600988,0.000065150285,0.000039928156,0.000037632617,0.00053224806,0.0011765783,0.00016119753,0.0002238366,0.00011722766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004232358,0.00008270207,0.025989488,0.000042408952,0.000046579626,0.00007981165,0.0035849516,0.0000013861544,0.0021008695,0.9242245,0.0049538403,0.038851142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030325932,0.00003700848,0.011697033,0.000075288655,0.000012357105,0.0000022738502,0.00031377116,0.000046529865,0.00027135096,0.0029961884,0.9840183,0.00022664049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047069795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032522626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97906446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003878819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010431373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280544097","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1084571","title":"Property Rights and Development: The Contingent Case for Formalization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Transition (genetics); Precondition; Political science; Institutional change; Sociology; Economics; Law; Economic system; Epistemology; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030575768336170758,"score_gpt":0.26942862663083444,"score_spread":0.23885285829466368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280544097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91651016,0.008694585,0.040297262,0.010951687,0.0005887308,0.0019997223,0.0000024909898,0.000119425604,0.020835904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98323303,0.001188523,0.0001607006,0.00010392475,0.00031545243,0.000014203049,0.0000011876153,0.000006082177,0.014976862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984819,0.00007535964,0.00016819405,0.00009504544,0.0001697277,0.0010097706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965507,0.00003136232,0.00008112386,0.000047652844,0.00011826354,0.000066532615],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015387416,0.00007341162,0.00008223107,0.00002956037,0.0037529394,0.00007356731,0.00012325014,0.000039080456,0.000016888509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045478904,0.000030183115,0.000030290486,0.00007385574,0.00013104847,0.00026109433,0.000014218524,0.00032990117,0.000003889616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013897898,0.000105822306,0.0012207432,0.0000111739155,0.00019706412,0.0001088694,0.045186765,0.000006335506,0.00003563188,0.83454865,0.0016417608,0.11679822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005430502,0.00009752703,0.000059797847,0.000006703974,0.000012636402,0.0030919358,0.0014676146,0.000079104895,0.000092351016,0.02514406,0.9692925,0.000112689064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014868532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026144639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002697713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016586861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889358966","doi":"10.5167/uzh-133185","title":"Laws from ‘Heaven’ to ‘Nature’: some afterthoughts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Leipzig; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Universität Zürich; Universität Heidelberg; University of Oxford; Brandeis University; University of Cambridge; American Philosophical Society; York University; Boston College","keywords":"Heaven; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.014257469502273152,"score_gpt":0.2310932553342878,"score_spread":0.21683578583201463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889358966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024704502,0.0009328515,0.00032242126,0.002382203,0.0004940872,0.0007711514,0.00034290622,0.000056870336,0.9922271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027502622,0.000949734,0.002464698,0.0003584783,0.0008405639,0.0000010320379,0.000031469222,0.0000357397,0.96781564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794275,0.0003296708,0.00021674628,0.0007257142,0.00044176241,0.00034338768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829006,0.00040988714,0.00027906327,0.00045774414,0.00011300899,0.00045025974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046181207,0.0003115474,0.0006037155,0.00018314912,0.0012537971,0.00015170079,0.0013287782,0.0004026946,0.0005842298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017937342,0.00026180412,0.00017882933,0.00005726968,0.00060035585,0.0006791329,0.0009913499,0.0004784816,0.00014865062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005860651,0.00008505214,0.000118452925,0.00004231644,0.00033840007,0.00064652704,0.008709823,4.420121e-7,0.0009906553,0.93254167,0.04722898,0.00871161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004239768,0.00014359778,0.0007532868,0.00037312318,0.00010989953,0.000003737574,0.00026915752,0.0000012482276,0.00006850957,0.05951562,0.93789834,0.00043949424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005564962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003164541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89066935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008873713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024239282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28930196","doi":"10.3390/ijerph14091089","title":"FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE ONE AND TWO DIRECTOR STATUTES","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"North-West University; South Africa Netherlands research Programme on Alternatives in Development; Population Health Research Institute","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Corporation; Governor; Law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Order (exchange); Management; Business; Engineering; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.1451607574747402,"score_gpt":0.4186292728999549,"score_spread":0.27346851542521466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28930196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61923987,0.0008671126,0.000040448005,0.3755483,0.0001667451,0.000119125994,0.000029058889,0.0000033264373,0.0039860364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859635,0.010241054,0.000044381148,0.00071745133,0.00085418514,0.0000020635787,4.939993e-7,0.0000042494144,0.0021726207],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979082,0.00046700172,0.00017373856,0.00009463035,0.0010750759,0.00028138584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988406,0.0006273249,0.00008600747,0.000054711425,0.00005927998,0.000332121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031288294,0.00004795766,0.00008066136,0.00010946009,0.0003103046,0.00015990851,0.00026160997,0.000019311541,0.0006028402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030063282,0.000020623504,0.00002101672,0.00004690144,0.0005747971,0.00030934,0.00006680715,0.00019447038,0.000015920625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022824651,0.00075265527,0.012565287,0.000003697248,0.00014091609,0.000027761305,0.0066158595,6.7599466e-8,0.0016349053,0.12250041,0.004294386,0.8512358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067616836,0.0005563337,0.03685087,0.000067250476,7.873938e-7,0.000012089959,0.0013079807,0.0000018011556,0.00014764401,0.011468588,0.9488539,0.0000565513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043831827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031904233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9445596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002445782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022473221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6600678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916627404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5690","title":"Freedom and Access to Housing: Three Conceptions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative liberty; Premise; State (computer science); Power (physics); Property (philosophy); Law; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10248292355161469,"score_gpt":0.3805958446446976,"score_spread":0.2781129210930829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916627404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6316828,0.00016970227,0.004277767,0.01726017,0.0012314485,0.0013712053,0.000040289833,0.00018580929,0.34378082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935985,0.000025334448,0.0011088894,0.001802372,0.0015203094,0.000018872239,0.0000010165634,0.000017424085,0.0019072822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986703,0.000055413486,0.00022527945,0.00031347576,0.00037761984,0.00035791495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893004,0.000096522985,0.00007945985,0.0002648355,0.00030034932,0.00032881033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003353739,0.00012780368,0.00021340259,0.000149182,0.0005079836,0.000495988,0.0009207643,0.00008496574,0.0008484651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031350946,0.000102417594,0.00003629231,0.0005062005,0.000532846,0.00088161515,0.00040861097,0.000106461426,0.00015953314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018189598,0.0013058259,0.10291876,0.0007890292,0.0005132231,0.00008789986,0.09543494,0.0006236106,0.024561109,0.3528064,0.2785405,0.14059974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006127256,0.00038897284,0.105513245,0.00019302685,0.00022241895,0.0000013134337,0.0008693013,0.00012055929,0.0022044843,0.0013931519,0.8879655,0.0005153122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007848774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013233903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.609425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004356932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016219803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917896605","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n1p98","title":"State Responsibility and the Question of Expropriation: A Preliminary to the “Land Expropriation without Compensation” Policy in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); International law; Government (linguistics); Law; Foreign direct investment; State responsibility; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.019741528244919235,"score_gpt":0.30169641994618135,"score_spread":0.2819548917012621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917896605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819306,0.0001906895,0.000094901654,0.014251482,0.00007529786,0.00032593272,0.0000057684883,0.0000023263863,0.0031229586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.000042926164,0.00013806239,0.0002302881,0.00016471466,0.0000017005017,2.7477336e-7,0.000002778119,0.00051812024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988409,0.0004212918,0.00029539154,0.00006760914,0.0002545337,0.00012025004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928325,0.00017810281,0.00021336124,0.00008672679,0.0001754024,0.000063149004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002283748,0.00005075696,0.00014980264,0.0000631903,0.00015933384,0.000068218105,0.0000904062,0.000030355073,0.0000075307557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028913477,0.000023342658,0.000025501871,0.00012047062,0.00020890622,0.00014876228,0.0000272653,0.00011137611,9.824482e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006587728,0.000035112622,0.012022019,0.000018501642,0.000012344394,8.4354883e-7,0.09996915,0.000076251985,0.00010139743,0.88659465,0.000019428691,0.00049149914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007954251,0.0018514389,0.5313058,0.00041628792,0.00010190399,0.000026861955,0.013108745,0.0026167345,0.00055779604,0.3268519,0.11482738,0.00038088896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00395574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079642347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5597428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048608003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017550284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5979922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940566018","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2019.67.1.krever","title":"Non-Residents and Capital Gains Tax in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital gains tax; Taxable income; State income tax; Tax reform; Economics; International taxation; Double taxation; Tax avoidance; Withholding tax; Capital (architecture); Income tax; Ad valorem tax; Indirect tax; Labour economics; Public economics; Economic policy; Accounting; Geography","score_opus":0.02777445330689098,"score_gpt":0.26016266929403625,"score_spread":0.23238821598714526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940566018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648591,0.00022800034,0.0000019472977,0.018585399,0.0010661264,0.00035236578,0.000101173864,0.000009200941,0.01479667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8275456,0.000112193266,0.000044888115,0.00033273397,0.0004999391,0.0000062486088,0.0000067947653,0.000020145675,0.17143148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760866,0.00011022787,0.00036021217,0.00033776608,0.00018275483,0.0014003712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968346,0.000038891634,0.00013116123,0.00022983838,0.00012111189,0.002644397],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008382048,0.00020758269,0.00033719675,0.0005213697,0.0005811708,0.00028982217,0.00047077818,0.00022030306,0.0023547125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015254226,0.00018958966,0.000079918056,0.0004266346,0.0002099874,0.0005027,0.000025786607,0.0006756499,0.00020646308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058516238,0.00011603493,0.653871,0.000154995,0.00015983976,0.0072494266,0.08197032,0.00014439342,0.0006061213,0.020606365,0.22380385,0.01125915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012354326,0.00019174282,0.34071246,0.0002962279,0.000026525006,0.0003076654,0.0037382154,0.000101193626,0.00002860538,0.0034805974,0.6491551,0.0007262588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95697665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42535123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014574783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095693156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945448988","doi":"","title":"Memphis Fights Blight: Collaborating to Win the Battle Against Vacant and Abandoned Property","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bridges Conversations in Global Politics and Public Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memphis; Battle; Property value; Blight; Property (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Public administration; Environmental planning; Archaeology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.023886984082813815,"score_gpt":0.2956647615693657,"score_spread":0.2717777774865519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945448988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53658646,0.00024886127,0.000076538076,0.3989088,0.000289764,0.0005991646,0.00037507334,0.000070829396,0.06284451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929871,0.00033554673,0.000061926694,0.0027351666,0.00041956548,0.000027739392,0.000004588004,0.0000068231698,0.0034215518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984874,0.00018424535,0.00024195302,0.0002578794,0.0002554645,0.00057303306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895704,0.00022924387,0.000060278508,0.00019046552,0.00018909328,0.0003739036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004129869,0.00013927712,0.00016438575,0.00013309621,0.00075118826,0.00035935195,0.00024102915,0.00005833091,0.000039426242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015283856,0.00006406155,0.00002681651,0.00071802357,0.0004915367,0.00035809577,0.0001178896,0.000064760585,0.000019409039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006572911,0.000035930156,0.008785865,0.000006654904,0.000018612067,0.0000041420353,0.002153582,8.344341e-7,0.00004013905,0.96851945,0.007811324,0.012616903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072218105,0.000039183862,0.02660309,0.00004328486,0.00000888488,0.000005436997,0.0009971699,0.00010735984,0.000048053174,0.003778852,0.96742994,0.00021658221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046820402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013506067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035990658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009938405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9595269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977184238","doi":"10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4208","title":"The Position and the Development Trends Private Property and Common Property","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Public property; Property law; Property rights; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economic history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.03164252809627051,"score_gpt":0.3110576130483996,"score_spread":0.2794150849521291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977184238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87460864,0.006670732,0.000005461506,0.08603749,0.00064198556,0.00035409434,4.3783413e-7,0.000013646306,0.031667493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874636,0.0021370493,0.00016621753,0.0002773301,0.00011413444,0.0000042695924,3.38017e-8,0.0000031048762,0.0098342765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829334,0.0001636301,0.0003255586,0.00014880479,0.00076770235,0.00030095153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991264,0.0001495509,0.00021909125,0.00009422996,0.00031787786,0.00009286698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048986734,0.00010222539,0.00022707475,0.000078853554,0.0035611973,0.00050842046,0.0004544859,0.000021396592,0.0000060469038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002193933,0.000025803949,0.000034929348,0.00044567187,0.005283536,0.00090720406,0.00019728723,0.00020816304,0.000003413628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082214107,0.0001140756,0.014237434,0.0000425511,0.00026064145,0.000021220509,0.11976529,0.0000091438715,0.002660968,0.13057567,0.0018633386,0.7296275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013057443,0.0003172997,0.027718281,0.00015365201,0.000035669447,0.00006925472,0.011006987,0.00008939396,0.0009354891,0.0016416758,0.9565304,0.00019615574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044363822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006430971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95466703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010551216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000247572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991919886","doi":"10.29173/alr2578","title":"Let's Talk About Royalties: The Continued Uncertainty Surrounding the Creation and Legal Status of the Overriding Royalty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Supreme court; Property law; Law; Energy law; Property (philosophy); Capital (architecture); Law and economics; Economics; Business; Property rights; Political science; Environmental law","score_opus":0.016490411099595977,"score_gpt":0.2898602242173984,"score_spread":0.2733698131178024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991919886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25453064,0.12283269,0.000004768202,0.02550893,0.000996738,0.0032364428,0.000015048593,0.000030133562,0.5928446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94965,0.025361506,0.0000036705549,0.0021796403,0.00011363901,0.00002346829,0.0000033233375,0.000009575625,0.022655202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981227,0.0006120203,0.0003216133,0.00020033751,0.00037945725,0.0003638982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998286,0.00088258495,0.0002606317,0.00041161836,0.00009496181,0.00006417645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014057735,0.00013576189,0.00031290483,0.000007748016,0.00086249283,0.00017492501,0.00043904604,0.000046925943,0.00037105885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005655739,0.000050457227,0.00013516094,0.0002415663,0.00051990896,0.00025637035,0.00009669434,0.00019693385,0.000017488275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000948545,0.000014072486,0.0017340195,0.00028605404,0.00003876226,3.3506493e-7,0.0019944245,0.000008998772,0.000032591168,0.9886974,0.0011162352,0.006067612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014309384,0.000017829432,0.0013319106,0.0011118904,0.00007004198,0.0000016183138,0.00025640745,0.00006933037,0.000021655394,0.00020805142,0.9966748,0.00009340608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34227675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100558355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007407446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014681657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9158541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W305844978","doi":"","title":"Eminent Domain in Oil and Gas: Tax Treatment When a Pipeline Devalues Surrounding Property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Easement; Pipeline (software); Natural gas; Revenue; Engineering; Petroleum industry; Business; Finance; Waste management; Law; Environmental engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.029668317621907206,"score_gpt":0.27344321884272793,"score_spread":0.24377490122082074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W305844978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90401685,0.0013915297,0.000042168427,0.017360535,0.00023930996,0.00020925827,0.000013315244,0.000043168107,0.076683864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452603,0.00082912535,0.0009372177,0.00028039832,0.00093236816,0.000028576082,0.0000018148128,0.000022679702,0.05170756],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845266,0.0003033818,0.0003002322,0.00018275187,0.0003320376,0.00042894392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942786,0.000040522962,0.00010350838,0.00009781814,0.00008777687,0.00024251943],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009258445,0.00015019337,0.00021864106,0.000060395505,0.0007866476,0.0004476677,0.00016682576,0.00007040406,0.0010649449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004350839,0.000070254166,0.00006476667,0.0000885261,0.00023877229,0.0003521861,0.000028829856,0.00019611779,0.00011205891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018753066,0.00073757756,0.019624734,0.00003968095,0.0001358091,0.00024020397,0.25282443,0.00001366627,0.0017979891,0.029888215,0.0029852937,0.69152486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023914783,0.0002214129,0.00023075513,0.00023015031,0.00003245368,0.00009120584,0.030945532,0.0002519933,0.00006969676,0.041900884,0.9232211,0.00041334057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10012203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08182886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9202358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028043246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011012223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094481967","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3651556","title":"Clarifying the Matter: Modernizing Peace, Order, and Good Government in the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act Appeals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Natural resource economics; Pollution; Business; Public economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.021449565580174718,"score_gpt":0.25554899140292386,"score_spread":0.23409942582274915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094481967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60086185,0.014062294,0.008860472,0.35017416,0.00015994048,0.00085583125,0.000003044822,0.00006269471,0.024959682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894454,0.0074376073,0.000028521585,0.0022554668,0.00041057557,0.0000038685707,2.7614485e-7,0.000011476254,0.00040680708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973701,0.00043672352,0.00021958599,0.00016435402,0.00058258517,0.0012266063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962366,0.000060041737,0.0001299674,0.000092343806,0.000023096572,0.00007089577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002966741,0.00011530917,0.00013071882,0.000020197771,0.0010960203,0.000273961,0.0004072655,0.00005799158,0.000022446742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008248657,0.00005708743,0.00004954978,0.00027851382,0.00008646469,0.0002985252,0.00005075869,0.0017222279,0.0000123629225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028893226,0.00023559101,0.02685471,0.000038715934,0.00025643886,0.00003661809,0.1204737,0.0006041904,0.0016765193,0.6452612,0.001212859,0.20306051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049407748,0.0016042734,0.019651724,0.0002718967,0.0002933399,0.00070316094,0.19121489,0.00927475,0.00016134394,0.15978292,0.61069477,0.0014061905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020779273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011500424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6094819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057793374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006110253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84298134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121940334","doi":"","title":"The Hand Is Invincible, Nature Knows Best, and Justice Is Blind: Markets, Ecosystems, Legal Instrumentalism, and the Natural Law of Systems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Law and economics; Law; Explication; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017381783659079015,"score_gpt":0.26767914648139224,"score_spread":0.25029736282231324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121940334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62214446,0.054385416,0.000003389121,0.01990814,0.0017648257,0.0014117382,0.00007174748,0.000048888574,0.3002614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96416193,0.004638931,0.000019215364,0.0013435436,0.00031562033,0.000014192055,0.0000020765065,0.000008877864,0.029495591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829924,0.00034187533,0.00032017182,0.0002499362,0.00048732746,0.00030143803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909145,0.00029321964,0.00014066778,0.00023160495,0.00013549802,0.00010758439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010265716,0.00016356118,0.00027684536,0.000033784458,0.0025083392,0.0004347192,0.00033367905,0.00017808864,0.00005299722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006432715,0.00006722898,0.000056885052,0.00019802303,0.0019274259,0.00041170185,0.000120207864,0.00037916302,0.0000057658804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044410903,0.00004401385,0.00027797424,0.00014311564,0.00013498472,0.000012465642,0.01035555,3.0725587e-7,0.000073737116,0.9507338,0.036774132,0.0010058256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015218748,0.000038200174,0.000109754226,0.00006099732,0.00007440454,0.00006924772,0.0047340463,0.00081689964,0.00034148674,0.00017073813,0.9919118,0.0001505409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055789284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023329422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95513767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000377387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121115205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123528069","doi":"10.7916/cblr.v2017i3.1727","title":"Progressive Era Conceptions of the Corporation and the Failure of the Federal Chartering Movement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Corporate law; Legislation; Federalism; Politics; Political science; Legislature; State (computer science); Scholarship; Federal law; Law; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.020572453192991936,"score_gpt":0.27365853854944044,"score_spread":0.2530860853564485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123528069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93399453,0.00025248886,0.000015372449,0.03660252,0.0004327769,0.0010206241,0.000018571318,0.000014752121,0.027648386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969609,0.000016994232,0.000038677044,0.00029226675,0.00016024178,0.000026116897,5.315884e-7,0.000003371494,0.0025008963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920547,0.00015649886,0.00015160065,0.00009986189,0.00026657773,0.00012001696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991838,0.000027898555,0.00030979028,0.0003497888,0.000093348615,0.000035406236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036345382,0.000063150466,0.00011267256,0.000004799784,0.002170115,0.0002314074,0.0004629231,0.000038185088,0.00010544123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009731085,0.0000244442,0.00006655821,0.000043256285,0.0015554217,0.0002671605,0.00013249955,0.00014026453,0.000002555188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026190011,0.000028358934,0.008202481,0.000012370114,0.000027262033,4.6423978e-7,0.0046494594,0.000006001974,0.0020994046,0.98349595,0.000585055,0.0008670219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069649136,0.0002340867,0.44103697,0.00080028945,0.0001734634,0.00000578492,0.008019065,0.00058207876,0.02732378,0.10310289,0.41112384,0.0006328495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008079445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014073472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.880393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001974247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008386864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123978572","doi":"","title":"The Rhino's Horn: Incomplete Property Rights and the Optimal Value of an Asset","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Asset (computer security); Property rights; Value (mathematics); Business; Property (philosophy); Private property; Public property; French horn; Book value; Economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Market economy; Computer science; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.02804498627541722,"score_gpt":0.2664841892460309,"score_spread":0.2384392029706137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123978572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2613048,0.00079566665,0.000065475375,0.038348302,0.00022992652,0.0009029098,0.000007630105,0.0000956742,0.69824964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628427,0.00011998737,0.00034176483,0.00025595995,0.00017074715,0.000009906992,6.35174e-7,0.000004405612,0.036253892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986736,0.00042692377,0.00017848152,0.00015358037,0.00032836766,0.0002390058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939597,0.00015843051,0.000059024194,0.00023046425,0.000069781745,0.000086327156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010825605,0.00008699876,0.0001431908,0.0000150089545,0.0014155899,0.00018837782,0.0004261124,0.000044954468,0.00043829717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005998171,0.000023152095,0.000046023208,0.00013017491,0.001240693,0.0002673029,0.00006228903,0.00012056782,0.000021061682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007814787,0.00007895722,0.000061290004,0.000003835604,0.000035291614,0.0000035534085,0.010338835,0.000008950322,0.000057391375,0.96697813,0.00797766,0.014377983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067529303,0.000107047636,0.0004954083,0.0000061926457,0.000016142845,0.0000035631515,0.000515663,0.014033769,0.00014469396,0.007909983,0.97597694,0.00011532045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02224664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062081264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014514458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024038654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124178933","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Rights, Resource Development, And The Source Of The Provincial Duty To Consult In Haida Nation And Taku River","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Duty; Resource (disambiguation); Supreme court; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012240639394103008,"score_gpt":0.25896639012319955,"score_spread":0.24672575072909655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124178933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93701917,0.00009225059,0.000064139625,0.011891436,0.000029724131,0.0004236219,0.0000011326282,0.000014273911,0.050464224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805579,0.000012206427,0.0005201607,0.00054070534,0.000106909785,0.000008602573,3.1743048e-7,0.0000023958053,0.018250799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992065,0.00013773216,0.00015376587,0.00012675088,0.00023397591,0.00014128698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969923,0.00008666732,0.00004777515,0.00007016731,0.00004883346,0.000047300262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006888344,0.00006211249,0.00009493363,0.000033205262,0.000448005,0.00004986803,0.00014845862,0.000039906165,0.00003960481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058647114,0.000025492449,0.000012710823,0.00018899572,0.0005694644,0.00012108222,0.000032869677,0.00008628402,0.000004254683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032246404,0.000088336215,0.010237774,0.000012429223,0.000020805051,0.0000012323497,0.19989908,0.00002154411,0.00017057116,0.7061473,0.003099945,0.079978526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006779103,0.0000074960512,0.008474993,0.000011394198,0.000003839323,7.013478e-7,0.0004003102,0.00006721046,0.00087399577,0.0004227776,0.98899794,0.00006142391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018702576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09389469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046077042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014312516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98783195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124516724","doi":"","title":"Death to Semelhago","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Damages; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Common law; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.05073519481133954,"score_gpt":0.3128993821918387,"score_spread":0.2621641873804992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124516724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08982741,0.0015766049,0.004986493,0.20608786,0.009437126,0.0008772557,0.00015191459,0.00025898378,0.68679637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8630318,0.0006627029,0.00017467952,0.0036842865,0.004147775,0.000004232766,5.989344e-7,0.00003994486,0.128254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676716,0.00034823906,0.0005335818,0.00036934353,0.0009178751,0.0010638026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796605,0.000112931266,0.00020573226,0.00030822848,0.00027856606,0.0011284953],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013164051,0.00028703385,0.00037694737,0.00010379216,0.0022160052,0.0005620042,0.00087351596,0.00018860564,0.0059066135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013210294,0.0001444186,0.00024102052,0.00033924426,0.00022532116,0.0007147991,0.00016559598,0.00041252899,0.0031577928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029161017,0.00043008084,0.0022970035,0.000021880307,0.00028427257,0.0009145503,0.022498231,0.000007310718,0.0027630876,0.7078909,0.15308802,0.10951301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007094209,0.0003054155,0.0010080779,0.00022400447,0.00004683022,0.000118820615,0.00035690464,0.000003845779,0.00048456425,0.003245524,0.9931275,0.0003690389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032795542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011621622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84003955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024721742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002708258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125353358","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.445","title":"PERSON, PLACE, OR THING? PROPERTY AND THE STRUCTURING OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Structuring; Property rights; Epistemology; Intuition; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013791017483509402,"score_gpt":0.22701702171855773,"score_spread":0.21322600423504834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125353358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3243057,0.00018940943,0.00006351895,0.007866417,0.00032791833,0.00020197313,0.000008463411,0.000018057657,0.66701853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864755,0.000064644046,0.00056028046,0.00002003473,0.00014484486,1.7401836e-8,1.6431586e-7,0.0000019812082,0.012732504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947053,0.000107733635,0.000073089286,0.00005604725,0.00019158663,0.000100999474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960655,0.000051123814,0.00012563956,0.00004616974,0.00011427538,0.000056257733],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004928429,0.00004210648,0.00011044895,0.000008759269,0.0019277459,0.00003276326,0.00021343339,0.00005631148,0.0021640125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043622746,0.00002018,0.00005602158,0.000020809966,0.00092644605,0.0004662713,0.00003176532,0.00021217142,6.8936583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064558676,0.000033880853,0.00047469308,0.000009609232,0.000081614766,0.0000094221605,0.19118527,0.0000026546425,0.00033990393,0.79988897,0.0023785785,0.004949788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00236753,0.000068990936,0.0053996393,0.000020818257,0.00008110094,0.000023056728,0.054925274,0.00013247451,0.00003569349,0.00091077486,0.93591833,0.0001163241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1296217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40852278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93353975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050648443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115584924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125518739","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1179","title":"Changing Nature: The Myth of the Inevitability of Ecosystem Management","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace Environmental Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem; Ecosystem management; Legitimacy; Natural (archaeology); Total human ecosystem; Precautionary principle; Environmental ethics; Utilitarianism; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Natural resource; Relevance (law); Ecosystem valuation; State (computer science); Ecosystem services; Ecology; Ecosystem health; Economics; Political science; Geography; Law; Computer science; Biology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009999540753997602,"score_gpt":0.24632671474118428,"score_spread":0.23632717398718667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125518739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03537112,0.38519308,0.000032415614,0.029953636,0.0008730813,0.0062511554,0.000075570155,0.000036378922,0.54221356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753576,0.022142254,0.000037987684,0.0013571539,0.000018060386,0.000022232452,8.0408716e-7,0.0000048830157,0.0010590523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865377,0.0004862405,0.00022112067,0.00013048454,0.0003415604,0.00016680315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942404,0.0000405341,0.00014702707,0.00035449007,0.0000039328997,0.000029954737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014099873,0.00008221977,0.00019477213,0.0000069111416,0.00025967252,0.000006888939,0.00029604274,0.00003442256,0.00032793215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025799716,0.00003586331,0.00013469477,0.00016759428,0.00027280388,0.00006154418,0.000083142906,0.00011901109,0.000015616677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021291937,0.000113362585,0.0004292203,0.0013144673,0.00004429511,8.1410786e-7,0.0007309354,0.0000016403401,0.00008079154,0.9923496,0.00043267995,0.0045000366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005615892,0.0000083140385,0.00028876268,0.0005390026,0.00004914769,8.0538354e-7,0.0003153795,6.809276e-7,0.0007095065,0.00024409746,0.99773437,0.00005376742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080722246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010981234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007226641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008701396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35906273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125995196","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2759","title":"The (ir)relevance of constitutional protection for property rights? Compensation for takings in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Statutory law; Law and economics; Just compensation; Property law; Constitutional law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Law; Government (linguistics); Economics; Private property","score_opus":0.02946621708068886,"score_gpt":0.23164383999305554,"score_spread":0.20217762291236668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125995196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7852731,0.0035284762,0.058962543,0.06903922,0.0026318042,0.0117591955,0.00028985392,0.000043452135,0.06847239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991362,0.00012157617,0.000308746,0.000024700106,0.000037560334,9.3343715e-7,0.00000227506,8.9592254e-7,0.00036708385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994972,0.00010287105,0.00009660161,0.0000466696,0.00016422528,0.00009244504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921197,0.00018360808,0.00014734469,0.000031723735,0.00038263685,0.000042715204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007457917,0.000034171662,0.00008316351,0.0000079705205,0.00094702194,0.00002045106,0.00012347035,0.0000178099,0.000010361226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000924677,0.000015818325,0.000023150347,0.000026723563,0.0008416532,0.00022588338,0.000010785143,0.00005096103,3.1981806e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015860132,0.000020676873,0.00018314176,0.000012163566,0.000036225745,0.0000010557816,0.0073715644,0.00044240223,0.000017554077,0.98613924,0.0011345088,0.0030554794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021601003,0.00006831348,0.0002550465,0.000027814533,0.00001483766,0.000002687858,0.006020245,0.004392486,0.000036043275,0.0066069313,0.9803727,0.00004275652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004922566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005944285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126012770","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3145","title":"The Philosopher and the Developer: Pluralist Moral Theory and the Law of Condominium","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Doctrine; Law and economics; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Property (philosophy); Legislation; Legislature; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Private property; Politics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030276685438155634,"score_gpt":0.29357808617889103,"score_spread":0.2633014007407354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126012770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041828207,0.003221773,0.000011957064,0.08128045,0.00032100533,0.00025085037,0.000003817384,0.000007270044,0.91072005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338174,0.0016329838,0.000042526466,0.0011196033,0.00048470416,0.000006036242,1.6253355e-7,0.000007934185,0.0033243347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808806,0.00096507143,0.00025744288,0.00011082203,0.00032510335,0.00025348173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839085,0.00078775344,0.00030504866,0.0002847224,0.00013504895,0.00009659459],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059237676,0.00011201129,0.0002345759,0.000006391041,0.009070493,0.0011296233,0.00077751715,0.000056799057,0.00007799628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003371184,0.000035485707,0.00008695416,0.000023526334,0.010200871,0.0003517979,0.00015537436,0.00034973287,0.0000038901435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007888435,0.00000768692,0.00006257412,0.0000021680892,0.000059554302,0.000004760451,0.0033517736,2.6842378e-7,0.000008741749,0.9940924,0.00018836223,0.0014328887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004354202,0.000020373265,0.00032191124,0.000026754304,0.000056530924,0.000055945664,0.0012165817,0.000018639072,0.00007370281,0.8469546,0.146808,0.00009278165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047865234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12620522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014728253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007176288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126145074","doi":"","title":"Reforming Property Law to Address Devastating Land Loss","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Real property; Real estate; Statute; Estate; Partition (number theory); Property (philosophy); Legislation; Business; Property law; Property rights; Law and economics; State (computer science); Law; Economics; Finance; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02608475479028058,"score_gpt":0.2872730475029215,"score_spread":0.2611882927126409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126145074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16478461,0.00011695705,0.000212898,0.0058911443,0.00055924844,0.00064414745,0.00001356295,0.0003226942,0.82745475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97031814,0.000009516896,0.0011131277,0.003978773,0.001062812,0.000038428043,0.000005733889,0.00002529074,0.023448208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979531,0.00023923379,0.0002834506,0.000376212,0.0005040624,0.0006438991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988902,0.00008164076,0.00007634034,0.0003139702,0.0001454425,0.0004923832],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011734674,0.00017397056,0.00024862855,0.00003697143,0.0012947619,0.00032855486,0.00047606078,0.00010245113,0.00052319135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030290426,0.00009823571,0.00006944672,0.000253136,0.00023786163,0.00060375023,0.00012156246,0.0002714865,0.0008296916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071087714,0.0000843351,0.002884561,0.000051634965,0.000031377775,0.00003104966,0.004756958,0.000046241774,0.00085904344,0.9619195,0.002174578,0.027089633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032586127,0.00009188873,0.00021735138,0.00009069,0.0000090942385,0.0000026491336,0.00020708593,0.000046221397,0.0008895678,0.001671123,0.9961817,0.00026672272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104865536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13293724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118523094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009934507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134871093","doi":"10.37381/7kfcpm81","title":"Changing Sovereigns and Settling Land Claims in Florida","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tulane European and Civil Law Forum","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settling; Business; Environmental science; Geography; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.01147888679492381,"score_gpt":0.22989497499782285,"score_spread":0.21841608820289904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134871093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50689894,0.00031261472,0.0000046061227,0.0005798631,0.00013080174,0.00011654864,0.000004199373,0.000040197003,0.49191222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299514,0.00017913639,0.000014249347,0.00062346173,0.00018244088,8.22769e-7,0.0000060555362,0.000014244864,0.0059844404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900705,0.0001434605,0.0001180722,0.0002088597,0.00013253115,0.00039001135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997349,0.000028651213,0.000028854822,0.00009792928,0.0000117521795,0.000097917575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067913457,0.000092127,0.00013488327,0.000053025044,0.00026905118,0.00012802238,0.0000980241,0.000029189887,0.00016957016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000062927534,0.000070396614,0.000019622308,0.000108580265,0.00010171919,0.00018913353,0.00008975509,0.00012635197,0.0000938864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038752132,0.000031660336,0.04566207,0.00005222569,0.000017006732,0.00010941986,0.008365446,0.000010058852,0.00023848657,0.93176186,0.00029088027,0.013422152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016820796,0.00016576501,0.020758502,0.00019458325,0.000013896529,0.000017422748,0.0035487772,0.00045662798,0.00007138381,0.005644891,0.9669201,0.00052596466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011122803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006856908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014401333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001229792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38263157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154565668","doi":"","title":"Drilling to the Bottom of the Orphan Well Problem: Suggestions for a Better Regulatory Framework for Preventing and Remediating Orphaned Oil Wells in British Columbia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Orphan drug; Scope (computer science); Bankruptcy; Supreme court; Political science; Engineering; Business; Law","score_opus":0.02117685140328224,"score_gpt":0.3019287645671203,"score_spread":0.2807519131638381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154565668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28322023,0.5849644,0.0010177745,0.07592189,0.0025290581,0.014343143,0.0004599978,0.00012680354,0.037416738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87319165,0.10305922,0.010697224,0.008533545,0.0010644196,0.0008561915,0.00006194343,0.00006350249,0.002472317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985698,0.00014177283,0.000529109,0.00023785776,0.00024174307,0.0002797412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908715,0.0001913098,0.00026286166,0.00020210032,0.0001840115,0.00007256982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017127816,0.00008962606,0.00035130524,0.000008723759,0.00058230344,0.00011051657,0.00019947642,0.000064258544,0.000020448191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019737615,0.00006329787,0.00012563002,0.00025117098,0.00024065106,0.00012977325,0.00009383057,0.00017040822,3.4850564e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011476679,0.00016278599,0.0017576619,0.016864624,0.000050420014,9.2476034e-7,0.002130863,0.000001120984,0.00006530327,0.7564137,0.0015626365,0.22097847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025068174,0.000034031455,0.0003564713,0.019931382,0.00006386539,0.000002253557,0.00012220493,0.000013238091,0.00010247122,0.00795604,0.97104967,0.00011769532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012370861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15306358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041193318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106189495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99420583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161251692","doi":"10.15173/a.v1i2.2818","title":"LAND ETHICS IN CONFLICT","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aletheia","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Lifeworld; Land law; Government (linguistics); Legitimacy; Land tenure; Nonpossessory interest in land; Political science; Sociology; Law; Geography; Social science; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.11380474092978358,"score_gpt":0.3767894480989423,"score_spread":0.2629847071691587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161251692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23341739,0.0018024424,0.000034832297,0.04489437,0.00039013085,0.00011572929,0.000003747808,0.00006862377,0.71927273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965825,0.0009848148,0.00012465633,0.00208133,0.00019215155,0.0000030088656,0.000002849073,0.0000044743683,0.030781677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930567,0.00020165322,0.0000747266,0.00010260387,0.0001606774,0.00015467238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996512,0.00014528292,0.000012959513,0.000089119814,0.000053979988,0.000047488622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044517158,0.000036520152,0.00007189745,0.000016247439,0.00014101787,0.000043864155,0.00009187776,0.00008794673,0.000770257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028376802,0.000026291678,0.000022119308,0.00015983512,0.000092731,0.00006742087,0.000021066937,0.00024573243,0.00011380221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002675432,0.00025684244,0.047696933,0.000028592116,0.000032336095,0.0004990312,0.11091348,0.000008937443,0.0020788072,0.7977385,0.010906249,0.02981356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013532836,0.000007046592,0.0026614398,0.000013689045,0.0000016295328,9.3319034e-7,0.00037414735,0.0000070319998,0.00033027146,0.0020499828,0.99436414,0.000054364813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075235977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03453295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98345786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020214322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022590598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162521870","doi":"","title":"Summers v. Earth Island Institute","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Statute; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Environmental law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.011657319795292205,"score_gpt":0.2724939326568197,"score_spread":0.2608366128615275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162521870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75098056,0.0010069811,0.0011751732,0.013841657,0.0028405206,0.00021574352,0.0000024494357,0.00009244669,0.22984448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585842,0.0022081465,0.000043005126,0.00016171086,0.0013774433,0.000001362528,0.0000011015277,0.000008301689,0.037614763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757653,0.000064220236,0.00014270683,0.00012394322,0.0003021755,0.0017904118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995944,0.000015704263,0.00006544629,0.000101829566,0.000072408344,0.00015020114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017861171,0.00008832685,0.00010606549,0.000066227985,0.00089314097,0.00014439407,0.0003258446,0.00008490017,0.00037732438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009215129,0.00005940227,0.00007747002,0.00016631559,0.00019167982,0.00049226586,0.000017205726,0.0022591718,0.00012535823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015139825,0.000026592807,0.00090349343,6.083369e-7,0.000032768978,0.000005609452,0.0006763317,0.0000013899595,0.00078275014,0.96904534,0.00035710688,0.02815285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032048533,0.00007020825,0.00026619135,0.0000033250146,0.000010427829,0.00006585793,0.000591578,0.000008437347,0.00006376191,0.09236342,0.9061167,0.000119594566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032021457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3456573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90575963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013194799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033897073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169645979","doi":"","title":"Takings, PASH, and the Changing Coastal Environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Subject (documents); Section (typography); Property rights; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Business; Computer science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.00899563938103796,"score_gpt":0.2335933446062519,"score_spread":0.22459770522521394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169645979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6457666,0.07594631,0.013125611,0.17127743,0.001405592,0.00086643064,0.0000068520258,0.00011929822,0.09148586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649999,0.022615511,0.000025510244,0.0002648568,0.0005610272,0.000003963385,7.503778e-7,0.0000065404242,0.011521923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798226,0.00022106947,0.00011420987,0.00011190823,0.0002702132,0.0013003105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997143,0.00006277264,0.00006272675,0.00007157152,0.0000239378,0.00006466106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023558447,0.00006915494,0.00010397375,0.000028354041,0.0010887962,0.00014976705,0.00013633445,0.000033605604,0.00016161718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071489056,0.00003800459,0.000059602644,0.00010612268,0.00024989364,0.00013166142,0.000057607853,0.00075027655,0.000014658286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024483406,0.000017301998,0.00020033719,9.209374e-7,0.000052216914,0.000011778055,0.0045161205,0.000002775035,0.00006572537,0.9440516,0.000033182514,0.051023506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014291602,0.00006003207,0.00021203417,0.000014964955,0.00004241592,0.0003371776,0.018588135,0.00005638113,0.000106784646,0.24332057,0.7356712,0.0001611036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056952634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005694562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7356381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020873662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088160567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83742505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175436812","doi":"10.82308/26329","title":"Liberal property and lived property: a critique of abstract universalism in the human right to property","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Universalism; Liberalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04680054956712093,"score_gpt":0.28047559265823513,"score_spread":0.2336750430911142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175436812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76150274,0.000067235305,1.2427282e-7,0.0109174475,0.000088546825,0.0017278228,0.00009401258,0.00013985983,0.2254622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760337,0.00009727774,0.00021329471,0.0041829287,0.00009819872,0.00007167746,0.000007979769,0.000046258458,0.007679005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627364,0.0008479073,0.0006216301,0.0007609906,0.0007836873,0.00071213837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854136,0.000120175246,0.00016373405,0.00039379345,0.00028124737,0.0004997009],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015856765,0.00037920155,0.0005241798,0.00014641954,0.0014515286,0.00018503756,0.0010674221,0.0002505347,0.00037251945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006297189,0.0001573023,0.00014017489,0.00082277745,0.00041703187,0.001142533,0.00025332457,0.0009159139,0.0000678302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010006989,0.0018669091,0.0010189812,0.00068537064,0.00026016592,0.0011718564,0.011965785,0.000032821663,0.2760822,0.57003397,0.0009659075,0.13491532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185149,0.0005687769,0.0023404583,0.000240294,0.000047780482,0.000012389689,0.0020375857,0.000025812864,0.012058805,0.0038060108,0.9769939,0.0006830078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018131107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009918203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021598111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118940196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179302855","doi":"","title":"Reviewing Redwater: An Analysis of the U.S. and Canadian Approaches to Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Statutory law; Environmental law; Law; Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.051187681580645204,"score_gpt":0.2548992073520314,"score_spread":0.2037115257713862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179302855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852563,0.0030487888,0.000035401,0.009700655,0.0000336597,0.00009776858,0.00000515034,0.000002344972,0.001819901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964506,0.002286341,0.00003700872,0.00015340441,0.00004784003,0.0000020924558,0.0000034830189,0.0000034536172,0.001015758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985733,0.0002514361,0.00017274318,0.00012234542,0.00016978281,0.0007104004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996795,0.000011810612,0.000046080124,0.00011107332,0.000011702771,0.00013981739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013739229,0.000053913645,0.00013874673,0.00015178429,0.00039061904,0.000056761575,0.00017561443,0.00003308569,0.00007735719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004380429,0.000034328554,0.00006777145,0.00067436596,0.00006608018,0.00016226216,0.000021642001,0.00038411876,0.0000012153421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010017913,0.00012948121,0.32360196,0.000006387472,0.0004896844,0.000010268968,0.02417155,0.00051765324,0.000760627,0.5827341,0.000019823503,0.06754844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067827164,0.00020494389,0.7172196,0.00009842183,0.0010524872,0.00008442724,0.05096015,0.001083512,0.000556105,0.07832453,0.14911519,0.00062240666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08604008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93604827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8500082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061495736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001748439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92004603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191946479","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3881244","title":"Boundary Law Under the New Brunswick Land Titles Act: The Worst of All Possible Worlds","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.015840593661799816,"score_gpt":0.2796596892811451,"score_spread":0.2638190956193453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191946479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13521016,0.04763029,0.0010266465,0.38831043,0.00067839987,0.00053250854,0.0000024291355,0.00008493101,0.4265242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9037372,0.0046752314,0.000022540857,0.0013916794,0.0013787189,5.941926e-7,6.36691e-7,0.000010512328,0.08878288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800557,0.00015618307,0.00019870703,0.000100449615,0.00037912035,0.0011599737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950767,0.00007580727,0.000120580975,0.00015787929,0.000051323175,0.000086771244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018470448,0.000096957854,0.000120612305,0.000029887828,0.0009662308,0.0002101912,0.00058045314,0.000056286266,0.00041788458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016904092,0.000041980187,0.00010420441,0.00019052823,0.0003534555,0.0002553796,0.00003340166,0.0010773538,0.000064477426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026756108,0.00003094303,0.0002582438,8.470452e-7,0.00008587627,5.477403e-7,0.0018173899,0.00003059157,0.000035271027,0.9768114,0.003086004,0.017816126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025991528,0.000058277677,0.0005700025,0.000012062848,0.00002926632,0.000028552677,0.0010703264,0.000013968244,0.00005088724,0.1382014,0.859626,0.00007933699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02696498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6024047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003566559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006240581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197035081","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0132","title":"When, and how, does property matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Property (philosophy); Tangible property; Law and economics; Nothing; Property law; Property rights; Law; Private property; Intangible property; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Restitution; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.012809334355310438,"score_gpt":0.2137237181715257,"score_spread":0.20091438381621526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197035081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034869898,0.0018154023,0.00025409684,0.06160657,0.00046061687,0.000107394786,0.000010238199,0.000026914258,0.90084887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8397718,0.0016438363,0.001794083,0.00023373598,0.00020692302,1.692265e-8,7.2616405e-7,0.0000038965754,0.15634498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994209,0.00012303953,0.00004419653,0.00009148072,0.00018180403,0.00013859352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995694,0.000013557063,0.000055773013,0.00006499394,0.00016174464,0.00013448895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018812991,0.000047859005,0.00010640879,0.0000061098044,0.00084430416,0.000094662675,0.00014664924,0.000041909057,0.005906199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011285616,0.000024410465,0.0000484704,0.000013484118,0.0002634734,0.0006890924,0.000055757464,0.000084286294,0.000005676885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004197385,0.000604148,0.023901895,0.0001484798,0.00056061125,0.0019249999,0.16733567,0.0000026532243,0.0060048453,0.47023004,0.1988958,0.12997115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026914058,0.000021949087,0.0011761576,0.000023511788,0.000017810144,0.000020445339,0.010009314,0.0000033863105,0.00011288467,0.00059214997,0.9876869,0.000066383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1019798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4115184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8049019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010884725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009382821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214682557","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0042.br","title":"Hanoch Dagan, <i>A Liberal Theory of Property</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018800059681103348,"score_gpt":0.2283910366791582,"score_spread":0.20959097699805485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214682557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018192353,0.0018059192,0.00028774512,0.001736881,0.0002778713,0.00006818425,0.000007956567,0.000015912801,0.9776072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89048916,0.0012832447,0.0014377732,0.00013573644,0.0002093902,1.8364691e-8,0.0000015446724,0.0000054323,0.10643771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906605,0.00027288022,0.00011458627,0.00009198812,0.00028686132,0.00016761669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992401,0.000033010598,0.00015407163,0.000104874605,0.00034223465,0.00012568066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045170996,0.00005722737,0.00016356357,0.0000094844145,0.0006045503,0.000026885591,0.00029430678,0.000058085367,0.005230323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030280513,0.00004029387,0.00011982375,0.00004044028,0.00038586423,0.0005487753,0.000062906445,0.000112526664,0.0000051091747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028115668,0.0003138525,0.0004304274,0.000025934823,0.00016679981,0.00026586515,0.028397135,0.000007245702,0.0040279566,0.9294571,0.010213705,0.0264128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005457603,0.0000769666,0.00037092998,0.000053323314,0.000039209568,0.00002022923,0.009046388,0.0000041349485,0.001659206,0.0028803798,0.98520863,0.00009486857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04368485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15508999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012428354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002901922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W342249510","doi":"","title":"Non-Compliance in a Dangerous Time: The Pitfalls of Section 27 of the Surface Rights Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Business; Law and economics; Compensation (psychology); Property rights; Incentive; Negotiation; Liability; Landlord; Easement; Finance; Law; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.02478156130461846,"score_gpt":0.2811178118612537,"score_spread":0.2563362505566352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W342249510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772481,0.001265389,0.00011196792,0.0027817665,0.00042392986,0.00023644562,0.0000011344657,0.000007664462,0.017923601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905151,0.00031476768,0.00001361398,0.000027098566,0.00022300927,8.045267e-7,1.8680674e-7,0.000005255007,0.00890018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981771,0.0002723898,0.00023921563,0.000095693824,0.00042618066,0.00078938244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993804,0.000046767615,0.00022398424,0.00015507494,0.00014434899,0.00004940962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029711653,0.00007968096,0.00015884468,0.00002992901,0.00025444716,0.000027707607,0.0005415821,0.00005979671,0.000027775202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005830454,0.000035754027,0.00008203966,0.00039148636,0.00020614162,0.00018238566,0.000030537947,0.00088964147,0.000012209966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001757917,0.0021352181,0.045040235,0.00007039986,0.001147187,0.000023374034,0.12928614,0.004328506,0.05405704,0.6988722,0.015091871,0.048189875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005314991,0.001782697,0.017740484,0.00046092263,0.00016500513,0.0002978239,0.010348735,0.0017476853,0.0117718205,0.60615057,0.34333843,0.0008808314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010312943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0415934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32824653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053133233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022355076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99627745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205177291","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006359.v1","title":"The fiscal nullity doctrine in New Zealand","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Revenue; Political science; Fiscal year; Economic history; Economics; Geography; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.019830691921551562,"score_gpt":0.3111477209807346,"score_spread":0.29131702905918305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205177291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047002595,0.00065353955,0.0000012089927,0.008855734,0.001015969,0.0006005558,0.0000017851441,0.00006630403,0.9418023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03384846,0.0010236347,0.000021382923,0.000089810324,0.00056598586,0.000015937449,0.00006098999,0.000008625109,0.9643652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869734,0.0001174044,0.00025299372,0.00021457874,0.00035961164,0.0003580768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942935,0.000118224576,0.00007849929,0.00018009295,0.00005365291,0.00014020359],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045106647,0.00013923741,0.0001864317,0.00004537179,0.0003968234,0.00028737806,0.00041503442,0.00022012614,0.0025677402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012170651,0.00006615356,0.00007081749,0.00020927988,0.00006685109,0.00014934428,0.000013874469,0.00034062666,0.0003409612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002050208,0.00008718837,0.0022114373,0.000019425897,0.00003573307,0.000010190511,0.012044846,6.269724e-7,0.000036456055,0.3445348,0.46249464,0.17831962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017389131,0.000014377706,0.020660011,0.000018791527,0.000005534096,1.1236908e-7,0.000719786,0.000006232718,0.000042693937,0.0062664775,0.9719602,0.00013192178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23859179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5913306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5094655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007909469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050953415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205354467","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006359","title":"The fiscal nullity doctrine in New Zealand","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Revenue; Political science; Fiscal year; Economics; Law; Public administration; Accounting","score_opus":0.019830691921551562,"score_gpt":0.3111477209807346,"score_spread":0.29131702905918305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205354467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047002595,0.00065353955,0.0000012089927,0.008855734,0.001015969,0.0006005558,0.0000017851441,0.00006630403,0.9418023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03384846,0.0010236347,0.000021382923,0.000089810324,0.00056598586,0.000015937449,0.00006098999,0.000008625109,0.9643652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869734,0.0001174044,0.00025299372,0.00021457874,0.00035961164,0.0003580768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942935,0.000118224576,0.00007849929,0.00018009295,0.00005365291,0.00014020359],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045106647,0.00013923741,0.0001864317,0.00004537179,0.0003968234,0.00028737806,0.00041503442,0.00022012614,0.0025677402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012170651,0.00006615356,0.00007081749,0.00020927988,0.00006685109,0.00014934428,0.000013874469,0.00034062666,0.0003409612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002050208,0.00008718837,0.0022114373,0.000019425897,0.00003573307,0.000010190511,0.012044846,6.269724e-7,0.000036456055,0.3445348,0.46249464,0.17831962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017389131,0.000014377706,0.020660011,0.000018791527,0.000005534096,1.1236908e-7,0.000719786,0.000006232718,0.000042693937,0.0062664775,0.9719602,0.00013192178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23859179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5913306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5094655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007909469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050953415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238239505","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_2515","title":"Downward Closure Property","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Database Systems","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Property (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.028201048674158843,"score_gpt":0.2684694340353436,"score_spread":0.24026838536118478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238239505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012094356,0.005687498,0.000019815285,0.00045022645,0.0016471461,0.0012312153,0.0009884513,0.00014888738,0.98981464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008638956,0.011784846,0.0001448381,0.00006628271,0.0033615606,0.000021336737,0.00043779265,0.000056449382,0.983263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996625,0.0001554945,0.000855099,0.0006236209,0.0012365293,0.0005042581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978267,0.00006853226,0.0005602085,0.00090711046,0.00031813953,0.00031933145],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010732486,0.00046716048,0.00089303864,0.00020279516,0.00032791385,0.00008548315,0.0008005113,0.00049987703,0.0011485056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013063819,0.00027363712,0.00025370956,0.000089763635,0.00038112816,0.00040907232,0.00011782054,0.000579988,0.00053165026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060090835,0.00009566542,0.000050880753,0.00048853346,0.00012702045,0.00017743402,0.0017614322,0.0000031133084,0.000017424569,0.6462839,0.31587645,0.035058018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024060972,0.00009694054,0.0000076028587,0.0008023189,0.00009602945,0.0000059101385,0.00008493838,0.000003911801,0.0000028783559,0.0005449393,0.997623,0.0004908847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008976277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016110132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6817466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001439052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008086858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244322878","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_1041","title":"Sacramento State","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Savoy Foundation; Menzies Foundation; Samuel H. Kress Foundation","keywords":"State (computer science); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03259441735316272,"score_gpt":0.2757141888251589,"score_spread":0.2431197714719962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244322878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000074508425,0.00066552707,0.00002569252,0.00023293309,0.0007020012,0.00062155793,0.00009762473,0.00020193344,0.99737823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5330875,0.00027952055,0.00008967614,0.00037029947,0.0011293725,0.00001199789,0.000019406423,0.00006218444,0.46495008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973854,0.00007039484,0.00043588967,0.00060354854,0.0008008254,0.00070395163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848497,0.000064850305,0.00025933425,0.00056762836,0.00023025188,0.00039296053],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004986481,0.0004745428,0.0005179725,0.00017653649,0.0006069449,0.00023981664,0.0006502367,0.0003806761,0.010391678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030779767,0.0003601553,0.00027328962,0.000020738564,0.00094301975,0.0000010821461,0.00016520037,0.00037321218,0.0026075721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002852704,2.7463858e-7,0.000008117045,0.000016710186,0.00010052691,0.00006379518,0.003945403,4.315239e-8,0.000017964214,0.97400343,0.0007812309,0.021033999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013021182,0.00006270462,0.0000073979277,0.00006551173,0.000029264125,0.0000017224982,0.00003300899,0.0000010366208,0.00003382934,0.535099,0.46420127,0.0003350194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021617007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007293225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.533013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021309736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003179752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245541635","doi":"10.1353/tyr.2012.0016","title":"PROPERTY TAX ECLOGUE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Yale Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"KISS (TNC); Art; Sunset; Advertising; Art history; Physics; Computer science; Business; Astronomy","score_opus":0.0816120730166239,"score_gpt":0.3447492499448498,"score_spread":0.2631371769282259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245541635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020035083,0.4352253,0.0000128433685,0.043448042,0.00030324774,0.00073053583,0.0000021527426,0.000068238536,0.5200093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17838033,0.57275087,0.000114902046,0.01045569,0.0018752377,0.00010124767,0.0000038138446,0.000017340379,0.23630056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897206,0.00032308322,0.00012870431,0.000073674884,0.00020067538,0.0003017822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995599,0.000036259382,0.00004685388,0.00022135177,0.000033976245,0.00010168167],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016915397,0.00006669442,0.00015418205,0.000006524717,0.00039078365,0.000023858665,0.00031579335,0.000024856969,0.0018000805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014877119,0.000022010801,0.00007121724,0.00017626745,0.0001535469,0.00018173037,0.00003944805,0.000102007965,0.0016833403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042106967,0.00012861978,0.0005815888,0.00076585653,0.000030493378,0.0000021571993,0.0034243509,1.01787656e-7,0.000024494284,0.17383614,0.30399773,0.5172043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000249268,0.000006145002,0.00013767366,0.00034232126,0.000025114145,0.0000022001193,0.00002037103,7.0171814e-7,0.00000906372,0.00013238851,0.9992352,0.000063857995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019636753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023240983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6952375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027576862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056470526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245611581","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v21i8.2589","title":"Fully Compensating Eminent Domain Sellers When Economic Development Is the Public Use","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Property (philosophy); Public domain; Property rights; Law and economics; Public use; Domain (mathematical analysis); Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02913044091216317,"score_gpt":0.2210257660880496,"score_spread":0.19189532517588645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245611581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840542,0.00006370918,0.000042987656,0.008099389,0.00040274978,0.00016750347,0.000001935817,0.000005727369,0.007161782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958187,0.00060018373,0.0018044183,0.0009143511,0.00035113923,0.000002394126,0.0000013540671,0.000011492165,0.000496014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990874,0.000017605937,0.00044237965,0.00013518306,0.00008304392,0.00023441658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992138,0.0000853246,0.00040869846,0.00010978734,0.00007406078,0.00010832936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008782511,0.000113557806,0.00025530905,0.00007172514,0.00039118394,0.00051893655,0.0002680549,0.000059665294,0.0003998832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071057348,0.000069594076,0.00004674982,0.000042832482,0.00010684114,0.00048648854,0.000067725014,0.00013673196,0.00006691541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075909396,0.00028221114,0.0641068,0.00016224541,0.00091234077,0.000015964233,0.098655336,0.0031834273,0.0005098189,0.70415586,0.016624644,0.11063224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055717654,0.000010914278,0.0073903794,0.000015792159,0.0000102434915,0.0000096670465,0.0017771561,0.00017716807,0.00004504378,0.001990222,0.9878599,0.00015633281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018121667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000596065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020050313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040073856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5004117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254291465","doi":"10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb08797.x","title":"Court Finds Statute Constitutional","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Water Works Association","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Service (business); Political science; Constitutional court; Public administration; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.009350045559989325,"score_gpt":0.26118952392035877,"score_spread":0.25183947836036946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254291465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38738692,0.00007555253,0.0006275457,0.045629404,0.00051418593,0.00032689824,0.00002758716,0.00028962607,0.5651223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943744,0.00024735514,0.00020224981,0.0010924919,0.0003998118,0.00001065032,0.000044444285,0.0000051282746,0.05425385],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986601,0.00016083315,0.0001574779,0.00016512,0.00044109975,0.00041535887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995972,0.000060343267,0.00007523677,0.000081821476,0.00009052616,0.000094871146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053914846,0.00008309689,0.00014220961,0.000037528313,0.00055381365,0.00016857717,0.00012914096,0.00006288554,0.003973947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042388354,0.000055955716,0.000056661425,0.00022858511,0.00048400153,0.0003404759,0.000010392515,0.00015124555,0.0007598468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001875358,0.00041541093,0.07496263,0.0000050188187,0.00034845315,0.000031842366,0.02362499,0.00055732473,0.00040082386,0.120798096,0.14432162,0.63434625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018850254,0.000022469354,0.0053680483,0.000008465671,0.000013413054,3.0740998e-7,0.00030474938,0.000052372096,0.00007640501,0.00059153774,0.9932382,0.0001355288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063765347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007232977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8489166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063969527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113525704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99693656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254455663","doi":"10.2307/3868143","title":"Enlibra Rising","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.021107170577860424,"score_gpt":0.2681918421883663,"score_spread":0.24708467161050585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254455663","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000041564417,0.9800369,0.00008111658,0.0004031441,0.0009111208,0.00061230164,0.0000024843341,0.000007799998,0.017940987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000027298915,0.98984176,0.00042165822,0.00015407181,0.000090041656,0.0000784732,0.0000039133706,0.0000115362045,0.009371222],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997891,0.0011726104,0.00026643806,0.000253842,0.00010726393,0.00030884432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950457,0.00014264708,0.00012514384,0.00016987871,0.0000011729122,0.000056562607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011352025,0.00017184844,0.0007807541,0.00007140612,0.0004092517,0.000030222873,0.00024935795,0.0002967436,0.00021416339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003108803,0.00009085299,0.00012283125,0.000073093775,0.0012112202,0.000060286347,0.00006662553,0.00038550462,0.000040557563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008516116,0.00004535715,0.00022871557,0.00018248138,0.00009388224,0.00001571724,0.0010230595,0.000001354803,1.1730755e-9,0.02773714,0.0029689157,0.9676949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003082658,0.0000111669615,0.000025022362,0.00013134573,0.00012514816,0.0000020943783,0.000120877354,0.0000023770626,1.17906e-8,0.0048469775,0.9942984,0.00012829438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007842375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005493207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001890683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008200692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4462791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255892564","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190860745.003.0005","title":"The Complexities of Land Reparations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Property (philosophy); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Communism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Social science; Rationality; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05079377325389911,"score_gpt":0.26211584697085216,"score_spread":0.21132207371695305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255892564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003274345,0.00008172612,0.00002226884,0.00010939806,0.00016786825,0.0002317666,0.000074318275,0.000044183995,0.99923575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036463968,0.00031910161,0.000043701042,0.00001538678,0.00030354768,4.143338e-7,0.000013336497,0.0000069492485,0.9989329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918073,0.00011883265,0.000114625494,0.00014505432,0.0002581821,0.00018254972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918175,0.00014490522,0.00016080576,0.00026106747,0.00018948998,0.00006198383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021626416,0.00010409379,0.0001712337,0.000040220075,0.001288723,0.000061335384,0.00055061723,0.00014744885,0.00004970639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017041384,0.00007165128,0.00010058412,0.000011605456,0.0014480419,0.00006674875,0.00012743982,0.00015064306,0.0000011191712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034483593,0.00000405285,0.0000019645688,0.000009330018,0.00004463677,0.0000034613902,0.0015313368,2.7900435e-7,4.6272552e-7,0.90501535,0.09285168,0.0005029767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011646994,0.000037650218,0.000005299724,0.000036285277,0.00004661028,2.939687e-7,0.00018537494,0.000006619416,0.00000967393,0.0044285394,0.99502385,0.00010331104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020999834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00663566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109285764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004934596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99119455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310752064","doi":"10.30933/kpllr.2022.100.43","title":"Tax Improvement for Inmates for Public Utilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Public Land Law Association","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Double taxation; Value-added tax; Public service; Public economics; Tax reform; Income tax; Corporation; Economics; Finance; Market economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.03952354825622489,"score_gpt":0.27502564586966444,"score_spread":0.23550209761343954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310752064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17249237,0.00059347064,0.0025572313,0.45063815,0.005848412,0.010181829,0.005609487,0.0013251789,0.35075387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577568,0.00001571177,0.00013217844,0.001263437,0.00060325325,0.0010316621,0.00047573244,0.000015892236,0.038705334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983381,0.00014886943,0.00023809705,0.00022738297,0.00049583544,0.0005517047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.00032322042,0.0002312882,0.00011643079,0.0003090061,0.0001087013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002552704,0.000101487836,0.00017014875,0.00006545683,0.0023721429,0.00050796336,0.00027508097,0.00007410565,0.0004428028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056927634,0.000079183985,0.00012294433,0.00019978768,0.000048607886,0.0005427684,0.00006687224,0.00010261358,0.0000035946366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018936551,0.00011342531,0.004115291,0.000015625423,0.00006588319,1.2968162e-7,0.0023254163,9.127663e-7,0.000026488844,0.9555235,0.030464169,0.0073302304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078430056,0.00016270216,0.00019400148,0.0000012776985,0.000015129215,1.242038e-7,0.0014926728,0.00020447583,0.000054359374,0.020700544,0.9762528,0.00013762011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005478429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014121613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094501826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002891233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310752256","doi":"10.30933/kpllr.2022.100.43.","title":"Tax Improvement for Inmates for Public Utilities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Public Land Law Association","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Double taxation; Value-added tax; Public service; Public economics; Corporation; Income tax; Tax reform; Economics; Finance; Economic policy; Market economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.03952354825622489,"score_gpt":0.27502564586966444,"score_spread":0.23550209761343954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310752256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17249237,0.00059347064,0.0025572313,0.45063815,0.005848412,0.010181829,0.005609487,0.0013251789,0.35075387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577568,0.00001571177,0.00013217844,0.001263437,0.00060325325,0.0010316621,0.00047573244,0.000015892236,0.038705334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983381,0.00014886943,0.00023809705,0.00022738297,0.00049583544,0.0005517047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.00032322042,0.0002312882,0.00011643079,0.0003090061,0.0001087013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002552704,0.000101487836,0.00017014875,0.00006545683,0.0023721429,0.00050796336,0.00027508097,0.00007410565,0.0004428028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056927634,0.000079183985,0.00012294433,0.00019978768,0.000048607886,0.0005427684,0.00006687224,0.00010261358,0.0000035946366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018936551,0.00011342531,0.004115291,0.000015625423,0.00006588319,1.2968162e-7,0.0023254163,9.127663e-7,0.000026488844,0.9555235,0.030464169,0.0073302304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078430056,0.00016270216,0.00019400148,0.0000012776985,0.000015129215,1.242038e-7,0.0014926728,0.00020447583,0.000054359374,0.020700544,0.9762528,0.00013762011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005478429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014121613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094501826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002891233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311547278","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2020-0228-0952","title":"Canadian Youth Plaintiffs Appeal Ruling in Climate Change Case","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Climate change; Political science; Law; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.10014834677444384,"score_gpt":0.3009701489513435,"score_spread":0.20082180217689966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311547278","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017005171,0.0012436705,4.024931e-8,0.0012854337,0.0018162001,0.0014320533,0.9820283,0.00006663974,0.010427129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023291923,0.03521582,0.0000039965985,0.002149608,0.0028480578,0.0008976909,0.93511003,0.000052183528,0.00043065625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975342,0.00031066654,0.00031741653,0.00054296275,0.00029069404,0.001004015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916106,0.000041903462,0.00015556857,0.00022693828,0.000049736434,0.00036478043],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009825819,0.00029863094,0.0004038285,0.00053515553,0.0039888513,0.00030666642,0.00020276844,0.00037048868,0.004818803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023943187,0.00027529683,0.00007709845,0.00080735295,0.00014699766,0.00036581967,0.00015340852,0.0006007577,0.000025944444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002587754,0.00030013436,0.00022508252,0.00096159073,0.000070427224,0.009964967,0.100082256,0.0000012430127,0.0000010235672,0.0111722695,0.87057376,0.006388482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037562868,0.00011274169,0.000019079645,0.000120224024,0.00006341761,0.00010361792,0.0066378303,0.000028090612,3.655805e-7,0.000040327173,0.9921147,0.00038393965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96901757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121540986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010188188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015755185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313787401","doi":"10.1353/rss.2021.0004","title":"Frank Russell: A Whole From The Parts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Sister; Adventure; Art history; TUTOR; Brother; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Classics","score_opus":0.0493520615747589,"score_gpt":0.3094114939375226,"score_spread":0.2600594323627637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313787401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43481842,0.32742226,0.000298453,0.18822838,0.0042265747,0.0006713846,0.000049699927,0.00008856749,0.044196248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90006506,0.0868868,0.00013913818,0.0018104241,0.0021693865,0.000004069491,0.0000021800456,0.000024982737,0.00889794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964554,0.0010818185,0.00074927503,0.00022366174,0.0009407258,0.0005491771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636966,0.0020485078,0.0004425268,0.00039758405,0.00056584517,0.00017584761],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026054843,0.000280853,0.0006347679,0.000042522282,0.002260313,0.00021682915,0.00085324934,0.00010084424,0.00048813128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041290023,0.00011574239,0.00037393032,0.0005221833,0.00083678094,0.00033943515,0.00011225207,0.00067587546,0.00011683355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011895598,0.001143371,0.0033582083,0.00009998985,0.006275785,0.0009836446,0.41224006,0.00041932228,0.0073993667,0.024316708,0.5214006,0.021173438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000883288,0.000098018536,0.0015094609,0.00017355173,0.0005097529,0.000052527867,0.019559966,0.000011187071,0.0026724006,0.006254647,0.968039,0.0002362016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015656868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042482154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46524665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007270802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035678854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313816677","doi":"10.1017/aju.2022.70","title":"Law as Infrastructure of Colonial Space: Sketches from Turtle Island","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJIL Unbound","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Colonialism; Law; Context (archaeology); Metaphor; Sociology; Constitution; Common law; Political science; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016350212775211294,"score_gpt":0.29079012684629413,"score_spread":0.2744399140710828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313816677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84755105,0.0001226356,0.0000036545773,0.003568294,0.00049729424,0.00012587935,0.000060731465,0.00008479376,0.14798565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98578537,0.000087194065,0.00006035692,0.00019367873,0.00050474494,0.00000388194,0.000023670622,0.00000905095,0.013332086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905103,0.000070601825,0.00013649777,0.00017169239,0.00031772582,0.0002524432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952424,0.00011833957,0.000060030936,0.000154067,0.00005904208,0.0000842928],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002043573,0.00008901343,0.00016757999,0.00003811635,0.0003465619,0.00010136657,0.00023607016,0.00011816993,0.0015459696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000936016,0.00006314318,0.000053827403,0.00033954508,0.0004351944,0.00016100219,0.00005858587,0.00012184774,0.00027869697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011169063,0.000058774553,0.004258175,0.00001959544,0.00011652744,0.00008095449,0.039545372,0.000032764856,0.005273073,0.88964915,0.05716402,0.0036899014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002917332,0.00004821836,0.0053804563,0.00001297008,0.000014366778,6.139012e-7,0.00049948273,0.000019503057,0.0014088699,0.08136996,0.9108454,0.00010842001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077278525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049876533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8536814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003822962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019807607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361003617","doi":"10.5040/9781350348837.ch-003","title":"An Explication of Common Ownership and Common Territory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Academic eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Common ownership; Business; Genealogy; History; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.07527752712469221,"score_gpt":0.3314673150299591,"score_spread":0.25618978790526686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361003617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008401879,0.0018070629,0.0000035622686,0.00085615367,0.0003642075,0.00077173737,0.000067383415,0.00034635593,0.98738164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.152784,0.0022473533,0.000028744023,0.00036443,0.0012562689,0.000035025107,0.000062710904,0.000087606546,0.84313387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979783,0.00014478472,0.0005632726,0.0004542495,0.0005281579,0.00033122723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868584,0.00017131945,0.00039312962,0.00043263595,0.00006303284,0.00025403767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094646437,0.0002933034,0.0005239847,0.00019641094,0.000344451,0.000036984537,0.00064354215,0.0011008927,0.00007453876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022109216,0.00023755801,0.000103903076,0.000023725564,0.00088873826,0.00015444716,0.00010778429,0.0011804667,0.000041315157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039946884,0.000018141362,0.00030564645,0.00010327597,0.000057592148,0.000013087411,0.0040213843,3.244807e-7,0.0011067819,0.8942663,0.0022409856,0.097826496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021995774,0.00010370934,0.00025336468,0.0003374151,0.00009542839,0.00000327103,0.00015216476,0.000010980111,0.0004369857,0.090116255,0.9078861,0.00038435205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020209872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001437957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90564513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007329103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015726112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96873343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809627","doi":"10.1353/rss.2000.0015","title":"The CCNY Affair","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Skepticism; Law; Spanish Civil War; Sociology; Political science; Classics; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.03331147691442319,"score_gpt":0.3107589695205214,"score_spread":0.2774474926060982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3706018,0.18008168,0.000034428627,0.15382655,0.0023475222,0.0007134948,0.000004870345,0.00008216925,0.2923075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77487504,0.18720634,0.000031227908,0.000301901,0.0009765193,0.0000019260929,9.2968904e-8,0.000011473903,0.03659546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977096,0.00053084793,0.000538354,0.00010489628,0.0006540521,0.0004622798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981489,0.0010364614,0.00024173151,0.00021086444,0.00023844793,0.00012357104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003293733,0.0001762422,0.00034470455,0.000037675534,0.0032247268,0.0001356496,0.00076351577,0.00006405178,0.0004422977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001223299,0.00006305318,0.00022400622,0.00030708296,0.001004417,0.000255438,0.000027981632,0.00039957114,0.00011483699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032084591,0.0007302132,0.0006690638,0.00008251553,0.0038248072,0.00017214773,0.21798933,0.00035073987,0.0008350587,0.081772424,0.37810093,0.31226432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004767623,0.00014524303,0.00030964127,0.00005117978,0.0001539829,0.000032888554,0.006742074,0.000006066732,0.00030518332,0.0047602346,0.98688847,0.00012828104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003121416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014859963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60878754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006166471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013003965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379230824","doi":"10.4324/9781003080916-4","title":"Riro Whenua Atu, Hoki Whenua Mai","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.06566606853348417,"score_gpt":0.2919825923616699,"score_spread":0.22631652382818573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379230824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068693157,0.00033224293,0.000017465258,0.005908481,0.0012421318,0.0003578343,0.000042415388,0.0005307394,0.99156183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00063107465,0.0016175952,0.00009580233,0.0007410817,0.0018570961,0.000010067793,0.000034108005,0.000076679,0.99493647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977986,0.00003918788,0.0003231015,0.0005150525,0.0007920322,0.0005320171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989723,0.000094658695,0.00012932671,0.00040552003,0.00013025488,0.0002679312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047275043,0.00033038534,0.0004279457,0.00015482519,0.00058701047,0.0002196519,0.00061674736,0.0005692988,0.022331525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049444785,0.00022520123,0.00026331868,0.0000708453,0.00039824215,0.00019376753,0.00015204524,0.0005330413,0.011213659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062543427,0.0000074486957,0.0000023271061,0.000012159121,0.00004435755,0.000059474696,0.0007750478,1.456548e-7,0.0000019597153,0.87182695,0.11908199,0.008181866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114979484,0.000030797222,0.000011624895,0.000070139366,0.000032854226,0.0000012554473,0.00005587305,0.0000018663451,0.000004745583,0.13338137,0.8659324,0.000362086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063739372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017605016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74685043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013733094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003245464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98955625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380228169","doi":"10.1515/9780228003076-013","title":"Creating the Bird Commission: How the Canadian State Addressed Japanese Canadians' Calls for Fair Compensation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); Telecommunications; Political science; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.041465886683178015,"score_gpt":0.2324951978737663,"score_spread":0.19102931119058827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380228169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004413838,0.0000042655442,0.00001436927,0.0273063,0.00021308947,0.0016381558,0.0011773134,0.00014512875,0.96949697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060987327,0.00003855362,0.00004007111,0.0009975833,0.00026572167,0.0000065313284,0.000055178403,0.000059236547,0.93754977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979477,0.00025948315,0.00019985867,0.00047439197,0.0005349372,0.00058364787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783725,0.00037336088,0.0002745593,0.00045765808,0.00037208322,0.0006850846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038590172,0.00037256558,0.0003909572,0.00012411107,0.006272491,0.00032330235,0.0011687472,0.00033644363,0.000081455786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007731131,0.00024178223,0.00022678908,0.00003774361,0.00065335387,0.00016416804,0.00014775305,0.0006664868,0.000010082332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006338782,0.0000036722267,0.0000021551216,0.000036517307,0.00014334379,0.00009639576,0.0067597134,0.000018395445,0.0000022296467,0.9718115,0.019775774,0.0012869509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035976575,0.00004376144,0.000016297972,0.000097955024,0.00014119699,7.255125e-7,0.0013708236,0.000077905795,0.000013348911,0.0006049645,0.99689585,0.00037739656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9590246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63932973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009521568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097384653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380239017","doi":"10.1515/9780773588684-005","title":"Federal Property in Newfoundland and Labrador","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0229878097381822,"score_gpt":0.22200194657476144,"score_spread":0.19901413683657923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380239017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008139773,0.0000059156,0.0000023920675,0.0008588776,0.00014248659,0.00078543735,0.00006994274,0.000120305136,0.99793327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005432181,0.0004245407,0.00008199956,0.00017759498,0.00015111179,0.0000020305233,0.00001123017,0.00003490376,0.9936844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982413,0.00012506831,0.00021079411,0.0005647651,0.00039203846,0.00046600745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910504,0.000056339446,0.00014745322,0.00027776006,0.00013206,0.0002813659],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018180649,0.0003583731,0.000463898,0.00019407488,0.00090843585,0.00017117654,0.0004264554,0.0004897255,0.0003068571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014223573,0.0002579105,0.00010617858,0.000017003289,0.0005225451,0.00033331962,0.00031092254,0.00056759873,0.000038386486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006954749,0.000016923685,0.000031481464,0.00004344376,0.000053356856,0.00018790328,0.0007494825,6.210863e-7,0.0000023366897,0.9882368,0.0031851751,0.0074229715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068487396,0.000058615235,0.00007105616,0.00014373167,0.00003911239,0.0000013630982,0.00008245516,0.000007432095,0.000004081354,0.0012291974,0.99721515,0.0004629087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28904474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018715791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004889785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012912197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381294627","doi":"10.37419/jpl.v9.i4.8","title":"Opus as the Core of Property","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Journal of Property Law","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Property (philosophy); Natural (archaeology); Tangible property; Law and economics; Function (biology); Factoring; Core (optical fiber); Property rights; Abandonment (legal); Property law; Sociology; Natural law; Epistemology; Intellectual property; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Business; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.08200422804584546,"score_gpt":0.33331888027108325,"score_spread":0.2513146522252378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381294627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21341789,0.0018461671,0.000021463247,0.0788963,0.0020961552,0.001384923,0.000016244729,0.00019681918,0.70212406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88006926,0.000524875,0.000089667155,0.00090370723,0.0006847966,0.0000036225927,0.0000010384588,0.00002201752,0.117701024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975236,0.00028445348,0.00062093284,0.0001635716,0.00097558514,0.00043185984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984353,0.000114392366,0.0004045532,0.00028515075,0.000565535,0.00019502765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025336426,0.00016038153,0.00037866828,0.00009320736,0.0005811235,0.00012030977,0.0010160564,0.000102974765,0.0007901574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037033894,0.00004904631,0.00022099502,0.00064319477,0.0008967793,0.00044944414,0.00011757553,0.00042405628,0.00031732235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010251203,0.00077048986,0.0027039794,0.00019697736,0.0005913805,0.0007301905,0.028032085,0.0001438428,0.013087023,0.61638206,0.22327313,0.11306369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046661138,0.00046056096,0.00040188237,0.00012756794,0.000043808348,0.000050690734,0.0006364944,0.000060096037,0.0017546627,0.004172545,0.9916807,0.00014439326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009801448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001094525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7684076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007538944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055022864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080605","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1452","title":"When Should Publicly Owned Land Be Considered Private in Homeless Encampment Cases? A Critique of Recent Developments in BC","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Covenant; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Interlocutory; Sociology","score_opus":0.13780281839369996,"score_gpt":0.3922041117613699,"score_spread":0.2544012933676699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422073,0.000057647372,0.0000011776448,0.047843967,0.00010108524,0.00016095143,0.00001090703,0.000009507863,0.009607489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683833,0.0010484545,0.00008801336,0.0014358397,0.0002869145,0.0000038124142,0.0000021715066,0.0000068863487,0.00028957575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842674,0.00024094703,0.0005196698,0.00010309404,0.00038186705,0.00032770447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938476,0.00009600846,0.00021423188,0.00004159218,0.00015027708,0.0001131077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012710091,0.00009338275,0.00037205857,0.00029702336,0.00019027595,0.000085676234,0.00015545443,0.00011924177,0.000051181232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025112432,0.00006788755,0.00005114098,0.00042236433,0.00021682531,0.00029960752,0.000055085577,0.00022378446,0.0000011606338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031093048,0.00040363602,0.03397007,0.00011348847,0.000103956125,0.00055308384,0.17668283,0.0000027803808,0.00041222348,0.7626133,0.0023226815,0.022511043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043012435,0.00021302032,0.10805333,0.0001984562,0.000018956714,0.000024003695,0.0071357894,0.000004647131,0.0004225671,0.039528333,0.8397186,0.0003810892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057624355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06024057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001938197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073070277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9569076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385598954","doi":"10.59962/9780774860628-004","title":"Regulating Natural Resources in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Natural resource; Geography; Biology; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0138112993064078,"score_gpt":0.17739166343713617,"score_spread":0.16358036413072838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385598954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013101794,0.00045389935,2.7821358e-7,0.000029080296,0.00022549226,0.00033310207,0.00013155375,0.00002425744,0.98570055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14537783,0.00009509789,0.000033704717,0.000027363098,0.00006023249,7.448131e-8,0.0000071631416,0.000012851682,0.8543857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986925,0.00005682785,0.00017799006,0.00031029727,0.00049062306,0.00027172008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993208,0.00006402612,0.00020897598,0.00018747819,0.00012819625,0.000090522306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015117245,0.000093395356,0.0003637974,0.000033368913,0.00024764205,0.00010482847,0.0005028842,0.00018247671,0.00038439033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013162738,0.00018604996,0.000088581124,0.000009963653,0.0003131146,0.00008856576,0.00016115932,0.00037405384,0.00000215964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022488624,0.000058406684,0.0030133633,0.0007894069,0.00053194683,0.004070196,0.01772817,0.000051365023,0.000025181482,0.09250083,0.34289593,0.5381103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035005523,0.000012423637,0.0011829957,0.00058899383,0.000023322025,0.0000034353006,0.00041146987,0.000022864357,5.258005e-7,0.0004044336,0.99674255,0.00025695885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65384656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056847994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015951243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7586897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391790274","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4697544","title":"Leases Over Real Property","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Real property; Business; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016871513039700508,"score_gpt":0.30020178905702743,"score_spread":0.2833302760173269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391790274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13056158,0.031518843,0.0010450229,0.028516196,0.0023731927,0.00046301723,0.000005936206,0.0006230214,0.8048932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78713256,0.02064398,0.000011176693,0.00010100329,0.0015900908,0.0000030134568,9.1432213e-7,0.000014322682,0.19050296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732155,0.00013431245,0.00016419675,0.00017455163,0.00039050455,0.0018149021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967736,0.000033609813,0.00002984103,0.0000837285,0.000051438674,0.00012404022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001704463,0.00010259406,0.00011181051,0.00008241186,0.00060814153,0.0003625863,0.00026501185,0.00006643087,0.00057212793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005324953,0.00005061039,0.00011689004,0.0002540946,0.00012617977,0.0004906433,0.000021180962,0.001257699,0.00019997385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020378746,0.000029304074,0.0001740588,0.000004710771,0.00007105481,0.000028729115,0.0010147184,0.0000011847638,0.0001339947,0.8982083,0.004590681,0.09572286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012239724,0.00012481141,0.000090968286,0.00003164224,0.000021539672,0.00007386566,0.00082185835,0.000059823607,0.000015774578,0.12766895,0.87084275,0.00012561724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011211962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022692893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86625206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095032767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053074374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392816027","doi":"10.29173/jaed329","title":"Guest Editors’ Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.009564481922806583,"score_gpt":0.2750108577097149,"score_spread":0.26544637578690833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392816027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79447925,0.0002392719,0.00016476947,0.054096397,0.09062417,0.00037587466,0.0000012028337,0.00004729763,0.059971787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66582346,0.0007374406,0.011917744,0.00041619703,0.2919272,0.000018170138,0.000003618808,0.000027604474,0.029128615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989875,0.00004398688,0.00045696436,0.00010168277,0.0001914983,0.0002183659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925834,0.000021824953,0.0002906594,0.00006581236,0.00018450765,0.00017887214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074066094,0.00008469537,0.00017554729,0.00011264538,0.00022181017,0.00014827203,0.00023302584,0.00004799763,0.0023028816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002203675,0.000060324357,0.000050442544,0.00005572727,0.00008033993,0.0008283417,0.0000102003805,0.00015368914,0.00090091315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033317792,0.00008695606,0.001605623,0.0000070573765,0.0000935471,0.0000098443425,0.004744174,0.000047745772,0.0001630614,0.016115882,0.95010704,0.026985755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001889016,0.000039444378,0.0027962506,0.000009444235,0.000005457976,0.000012957014,0.00021583047,0.0000044500784,0.00046720018,0.0003015635,0.995861,0.000097486845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073964975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014827105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.201303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006449296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013371856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393380642","doi":"10.33002/enrlaw-09/c9","title":"Indian and Canadian Laws on Biofertilizers: An Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biofertilizer; Fertilizer; Biotechnology; Business; Law; Political science; Agronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.03484657482675155,"score_gpt":0.287161796701994,"score_spread":0.25231522187524247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393380642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030822406,0.00036715166,3.3870433e-7,0.0036277918,0.00015420996,0.00015930073,0.00007532334,0.00007783803,0.99522984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14852734,0.00027895585,0.000012997371,0.000924294,0.0002690117,0.0000022924628,0.00004367567,0.000019486328,0.84992194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988234,0.000019872276,0.00015251385,0.00042373737,0.00027359245,0.00030689937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899584,0.000020336,0.000030245677,0.00023195379,0.000041352137,0.00068026746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023767594,0.00019980983,0.0002865247,0.000736446,0.00036443892,0.00033676173,0.00020919812,0.000347952,0.007779616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008090285,0.00013041879,0.00013223683,0.00013972503,0.0002222527,0.00011409405,0.000020532452,0.00028257555,0.00049578043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036256017,0.0000034420168,0.000022561997,0.0000058495807,0.00024322316,0.00009528037,0.0020601598,3.7035844e-7,2.5986378e-7,0.99028486,0.0012756988,0.006004677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030606534,0.000053418837,0.000063788044,0.000026376894,0.00027539607,3.841929e-7,0.00023780552,0.000017755401,0.0000012558347,0.0193739,0.9796797,0.00023963246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80566216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021574799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004022067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393937230","doi":"10.12907/978-3-593-45764-2","title":"Relating to Landed Property","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Campus Verlag eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Cambridge; Université Laval; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Oxford; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Property (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030312808324913825,"score_gpt":0.2839905182228353,"score_spread":0.25367770989792143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393937230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054960678,0.0004385336,0.000008259344,0.00092182116,0.0015216166,0.00085211004,0.000021783791,0.00043093768,0.99574995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018823189,0.000017205486,0.00009536401,0.00079824496,0.0022953735,0.000050162533,0.00001844808,0.00007950213,0.9947634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978273,0.000098149016,0.000335591,0.0005894996,0.00060270936,0.00054674136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989756,0.00007605094,0.0000943601,0.00037378428,0.00013192686,0.00034831776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005565874,0.0003281532,0.00041537007,0.0001666475,0.0005769658,0.00033833575,0.00051889295,0.00052367646,0.00043327888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013406132,0.00018681475,0.00019947483,0.00007057178,0.00023084867,0.000066891036,0.00017994599,0.0008278503,0.0031105657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029953582,0.000011460751,0.0000033118515,0.00014071187,0.0001060921,0.0002614246,0.016292058,0.0000010707596,0.000074916825,0.23489891,0.67433745,0.07384262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117545445,0.0000658148,0.000001221048,0.00046825982,0.00006536227,0.000003976338,0.000097460346,0.000005910162,0.000021820304,0.014269298,0.9844776,0.00040572538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014036149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027759743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31014013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054559147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017540616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99766564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394896775","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4762778","title":"The Duty of Directors to Link Executive Compensation to Climate Change: Lessons From Europe","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Duty; Business; Compensation (psychology); Climate change; Accounting; Executive summary; Political science; Psychology; Corporate governance; Law; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.036306066487298075,"score_gpt":0.3294973662459688,"score_spread":0.29319129975867075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394896775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4772496,0.024357717,0.0027763809,0.429209,0.004390308,0.0016315288,0.000105456624,0.00030002298,0.05998001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846908,0.010865244,0.000030151705,0.00023233092,0.0012905453,0.000009378701,0.000002078232,0.000014893692,0.0028646095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997799,0.00024645746,0.0002137137,0.00017233848,0.00034986695,0.0012186181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940133,0.00015335808,0.0000602168,0.00010761738,0.00014258895,0.00013487364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020605568,0.00009751196,0.00013610222,0.00007890384,0.0007447146,0.0002222102,0.00035077104,0.000041069026,0.00003788731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014132324,0.000054804117,0.00007362038,0.0005259942,0.00007064088,0.00018901529,0.00005697025,0.0007051285,0.00010877415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059506165,0.000015704618,0.00013154597,0.0000022616393,0.00007161939,0.0000044895883,0.009799406,0.0000052237347,0.0007047491,0.79206544,0.0004663502,0.19667372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014106996,0.00030692792,0.0029192516,0.00013030435,0.000045085202,0.0000071522522,0.0028580264,0.0000767831,0.0004370407,0.044521578,0.94836795,0.00018880684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050026174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033515602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043647073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089376525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394976835","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-56560-1_4","title":"Plantations and Chartered Companies: Land for Exploitation or God’s Gift?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Management; Commerce; Economics","score_opus":0.10372874830981209,"score_gpt":0.3327889269428323,"score_spread":0.2290601786330202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394976835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056849407,0.00044082242,0.00014306945,0.003554474,0.00037876322,0.0006543521,0.00023807485,0.00013801138,0.99439555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037943888,0.00083839416,0.00025521798,0.00021150372,0.00051060907,0.000038755647,0.00010304995,0.000022052562,0.99422604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992855,0.00000767363,0.00016944515,0.00022889467,0.00016135204,0.00014711675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995701,0.00015516004,0.000049437218,0.00007413406,0.00006969366,0.00008152609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013132,0.00013683805,0.00019377987,0.00008328198,0.00031165566,0.00021062934,0.00008723973,0.00013787794,0.0017350157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015975482,0.000081039936,0.000054651548,0.000020415997,0.00013081008,0.00014389145,0.000017293207,0.00009783651,0.0001307838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003390913,0.000004581856,0.0000010541501,0.00006756982,0.00004727615,0.0000046849873,0.004580292,1.5456493e-7,0.0000023881466,0.98027486,0.012884839,0.0020984085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018255683,0.00007786918,0.000006775562,0.00008315528,0.000051708692,0.0000016907464,0.00047951352,0.00006366798,0.0000027990857,0.0569792,0.94190836,0.00016267921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007205828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014163433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92902356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035443743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010918133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031282","doi":"10.29173/alr2753","title":"Tending Gardens, Ploughing Fields, and the Unexamined Drift to Constructive Takings at Common Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plough; Constructive; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Archaeology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.027103725892721014,"score_gpt":0.3109536792797493,"score_spread":0.2838499533870283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02262326,0.022374704,0.000002828947,0.10909393,0.0005387556,0.002209684,0.0000060350594,0.00013930601,0.8430115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442624,0.022080436,0.000038882063,0.016798256,0.00020654553,0.00008729697,0.000008422257,0.000017880508,0.016499871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986194,0.00031724584,0.00025069434,0.00025042912,0.00023703466,0.00032524279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834913,0.0011789468,0.000085229665,0.00022384728,0.000041201267,0.00012165115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079330715,0.00013181315,0.00038657492,0.000015916503,0.0010853419,0.00011617032,0.00027436047,0.000057278714,0.00032007924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003393505,0.0000711721,0.000084340114,0.00030179782,0.00059113506,0.000113527545,0.0001915629,0.00014762535,0.00025656747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011041371,0.0000035834935,0.00007680559,0.00013326736,0.000025625364,0.0000063093175,0.0030216577,2.6503753e-7,0.0000058876835,0.9875183,0.0059649795,0.0032322893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022895465,0.00001585465,0.00006331512,0.0009846429,0.0000555095,0.000006166886,0.000097153024,0.000008194651,0.000014703325,0.0021866427,0.9962051,0.0001337803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09843333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23151238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039853152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019836494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031296","doi":"10.29173/alr2756","title":"Bruce Ziff's Property Pedagogy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056339498397736,"score_gpt":0.3750849449950613,"score_spread":0.3187454465973253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004034331,0.023678882,0.0000013265892,0.06953909,0.000343002,0.000761449,0.000001946209,0.00018233596,0.90508854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08210773,0.21508598,0.00004872814,0.020950615,0.0007395863,0.00015779883,0.000033427663,0.00004339984,0.68083274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845564,0.00025085418,0.0002587539,0.0002769696,0.0003196019,0.00043819615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999223,0.00015749352,0.00006185758,0.00031494448,0.00007596012,0.00016677486],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007440927,0.00012948348,0.00031305183,0.000022176677,0.0005076531,0.00006700989,0.0004097533,0.000061581806,0.0024781015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003337469,0.000064989974,0.0001274179,0.0006168186,0.00021549224,0.0002525979,0.00007557909,0.00012852642,0.0066504353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002786879,0.000028983191,0.00007576637,0.0005189702,0.000019890871,0.000015881391,0.0008050432,1.4388723e-7,0.000013177851,0.83725226,0.117001735,0.044265375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000734587,0.000019239404,0.00006455362,0.00066618586,0.000028884526,0.0000023887085,0.000018303648,0.000005341202,0.000008063537,0.0004343937,0.9985251,0.00015410036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13771535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0926685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8815234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003490316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016833459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031496","doi":"10.29173/alr2766","title":"The Regulation and Litigation of Cumulative Effects on Indigenous Rights Following the Yahey Decision and Blueberry River First Nation Settlement and the Potential Effects on the Energy Industry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Settlement (finance); Energy law; Energy (signal processing); Law; Indigenous rights; Political science; Economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Law and economics; Environmental law; Finance; Politics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Ecology","score_opus":0.016702501358749955,"score_gpt":0.27211397449988617,"score_spread":0.2554114731411362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93760914,0.016755084,0.000015278765,0.037962258,0.00043213114,0.0029899094,0.000003807837,0.00002466614,0.0042077187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881187,0.009951956,0.0000031029365,0.0011024731,0.00013435076,0.00008330729,0.000008251128,0.000007363623,0.0005904645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803513,0.0008982287,0.00023369514,0.00020405547,0.00044832117,0.0001805754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934617,0.006064378,0.00016902671,0.00021287656,0.0000491637,0.00004280127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018211427,0.00013404724,0.00020400262,0.00002204202,0.0023509096,0.00012264108,0.00016332822,0.00009382815,0.000006270164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004582527,0.00004627942,0.00006975854,0.00027833765,0.00039391813,0.00014871858,0.00006861728,0.0001779358,0.0000046645646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082023485,0.000019326715,0.000090553156,0.00020204732,0.00012561001,0.0000027043127,0.009780419,0.000023642153,0.000023360924,0.87829566,0.0008701556,0.110484526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030171254,0.0005569547,0.028838508,0.010946895,0.0007552358,0.0000064386463,0.0002829147,0.0020350497,0.0019040013,0.17990404,0.7712137,0.0005391286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018142367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014310668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77034354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035253735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024109822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401967587","doi":"10.1111/josp.12587","title":"Property as power: A theory of representation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universiteit Utrecht; University of Oxford; Queen's University Belfast; University of Southampton","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Representation (politics); Power (physics); Mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Physics; Law; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.050320617727215904,"score_gpt":0.3463816251676915,"score_spread":0.2960610074404756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401967587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045764647,0.0017652749,0.000098410164,0.046158772,0.0013508424,0.00021454728,0.000005760216,0.000045664234,0.9045961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937103,0.00012837035,0.00005110092,0.00019291122,0.0020112493,0.0000010507192,4.1374034e-7,0.000009602131,0.0038950108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860615,0.0002550427,0.000360061,0.00009111719,0.0005542361,0.00013337974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933153,0.000089251276,0.00019306471,0.000053799136,0.00025843864,0.000073915784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011068702,0.00007076503,0.00020469767,0.00012541603,0.00022314649,0.000081467326,0.00021451511,0.00007875689,0.00057451683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020331187,0.00003783073,0.00023162653,0.00034378268,0.00028937522,0.000486572,0.00002147643,0.00023409979,0.000036142053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014737512,0.00007706622,0.000039409504,0.0000274538,0.00010313245,0.000060635244,0.025583591,7.4364795e-7,0.0008470269,0.9579527,0.0037260887,0.011434799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023319559,0.00023446129,0.0003109473,0.000106356216,0.000053031035,0.00001172057,0.001445944,0.0000027065516,0.00043304212,0.7018335,0.29524052,0.000094587806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018863504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007494992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94794565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007246204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036911128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6290557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807700","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.11","title":"The Liberal Case for Community Land Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University; Université François-Rabelais; Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04959892804806369,"score_gpt":0.3373374258143671,"score_spread":0.2877384977663034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389729,0.03312007,0.0004265118,0.080606446,0.007251021,0.00085749576,0.00015651392,0.00006900063,0.13854006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489003,0.00013239183,0.00008571766,0.00041012958,0.00063424633,0.0000030686585,4.180484e-7,0.000008248801,0.003835723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989863,0.00023492862,0.00021782696,0.000061030358,0.00015917326,0.00034074095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862874,0.00048774446,0.000057637142,0.00012975173,0.00017526493,0.00052085496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001806721,0.00007201759,0.00011187753,0.000047909085,0.0026354126,0.0007016838,0.00048522712,0.000056539182,0.00007180787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018015751,0.000040725263,0.000103629485,0.00014037648,0.0005023576,0.00036191018,0.000009668909,0.00045498423,0.00000971421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034935856,0.000015414704,0.0005567313,0.000047497262,0.00008538899,0.0057462,0.022944538,0.00001107042,0.000015417178,0.89771295,0.0478885,0.024941359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009470309,0.00008330808,0.00010994852,0.00009171405,0.000020553296,0.0006505297,0.00038950527,0.000034999583,0.000025676596,0.010009316,0.9884171,0.00007264069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22129704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9044946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94052863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017215013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001925328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404315336","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.011","title":"Conclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03217145450384357,"score_gpt":0.23703616670379857,"score_spread":0.204864712199955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404315336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011344079,0.0005372872,0.00001754117,0.0002311779,0.0006351955,0.00032170146,0.00011723559,0.00028110872,0.99784744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009512266,0.00048614098,0.000013141595,0.0000903933,0.00053382036,2.5014936e-7,0.000018981395,0.00003134038,0.9978747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987925,0.00003356877,0.00011990747,0.0004018664,0.0003760801,0.00027603185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928147,0.000040397645,0.000078667385,0.00027023593,0.00012023716,0.00020902176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015740035,0.00023067862,0.00026282002,0.00012889906,0.0005906988,0.00011005817,0.000493494,0.00038549872,0.00006237905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006870109,0.00020942019,0.00020435685,0.00000899337,0.0005177917,0.00009392302,0.00038689093,0.0004816297,0.00020415903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021121177,0.0000027369044,7.3185e-8,0.00003140103,0.00005263689,0.0004245461,0.00029988302,1.04701705e-7,0.000008803584,0.91106004,0.086676754,0.0014219309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014829946,0.000023497963,3.9428326e-7,0.00017271112,0.00013381813,0.0000023392508,0.000058922258,0.000008935972,0.000029922554,0.00017729907,0.9989403,0.0003035706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031130458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009035688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9122635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032211558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025732277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330638","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.008","title":"Homelessness, Public Property, and the State’s Fiduciary Duties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Duty","score_opus":0.03094965021768141,"score_gpt":0.21443945692942282,"score_spread":0.18348980671174142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006481473,0.0027468188,0.000005708462,0.0021168755,0.00037203237,0.00070126535,0.00013903235,0.00021085991,0.99364257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011830215,0.0028754615,0.0000044139497,0.00012060513,0.0003160325,0.0000022081867,0.000014050468,0.00003729981,0.9847997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835646,0.00012824111,0.00017759966,0.0004926453,0.00044993372,0.00039513665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990179,0.00010897327,0.00012077146,0.0003646533,0.00019034623,0.00019734165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048174476,0.0003228359,0.00044554452,0.00014964548,0.0010030831,0.00051254383,0.0007123448,0.00026615223,0.000029521705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020460262,0.0001772291,0.00017965164,0.000019814586,0.0026408548,0.00024010976,0.0005951314,0.00064866676,0.000041514813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087625165,0.0000047983635,5.866736e-7,0.00007948775,0.0001434491,0.0001647467,0.0017807133,1.0117067e-7,6.140893e-7,0.9562994,0.037927493,0.003510945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049049483,0.000016566908,0.000001945441,0.0001228478,0.00015127273,0.000004692367,0.00041538445,0.000023780585,0.000005765446,0.0010898766,0.9973372,0.00034017386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093906345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007853337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018005715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004257257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404901702","doi":"10.15396/afres2024-025","title":"Legal Foundations of REITs: Lessons for Developing REIT Markets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Makerere University Business School; Government of Canada","keywords":"Real estate investment trust; Business; Computer science; Financial economics; Financial system; Economics; Finance; Real estate","score_opus":0.08817678977434054,"score_gpt":0.40123193869098794,"score_spread":0.31305514891664743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404901702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015405198,0.00046171024,0.03281143,0.08169844,0.000725832,0.00039843176,0.000018267421,0.0001966572,0.88214874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84601796,0.00017182184,0.0079455115,0.00019371197,0.00027790037,0.000029680465,0.000008136257,0.000008805112,0.14534646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993636,0.00003526424,0.00014989439,0.00013761531,0.00014373752,0.00016988638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996073,0.00017093387,0.000018966812,0.00007199321,0.000094486255,0.000036305984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005130334,0.00005021234,0.000084944884,0.000060534458,0.00030004184,0.0001433526,0.0001339202,0.000042967047,0.00043972055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016389576,0.000033435346,0.00005771244,0.00025975014,0.000098882745,0.00032147527,0.000020131347,0.000051051546,0.000026215532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004910731,0.0000057572925,0.0000035553655,0.000026200745,0.000015139195,0.000001044905,0.00061099266,2.608017e-7,0.00011791445,0.96952295,0.007938732,0.02175251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056388108,0.0000113108035,0.00011953153,0.000051999985,0.000009763997,5.4683494e-7,0.00024442328,0.0002148709,0.00053836685,0.011380059,0.9873027,0.00007001286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020719168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034070828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055365555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005077975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48146316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405217431","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-11-2023-6726","title":"Compensatory justice and accountability for First Nations peoples: the Timber Creek case","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting auditing & accountability journal/Accounting, auditing & accountability journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Redress; Sociology; Originality; Economic Justice; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.030353856583384856,"score_gpt":0.3281378735954766,"score_spread":0.29778401701209173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405217431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553446,0.005964467,0.0038045743,0.013595831,0.009772832,0.0034305581,0.00048182506,0.0012705715,0.006334742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97288036,0.0025519023,0.0027631929,0.0019665535,0.01844624,0.00030941682,0.00005614763,0.0004002408,0.00062596664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98057485,0.0020589095,0.0054929205,0.0030398502,0.004312291,0.0045211897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479157,0.0355181,0.0049063307,0.0023949698,0.007834765,0.0014301536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050658908,0.0020237688,0.0022492907,0.0012908477,0.036786485,0.02514819,0.0034134595,0.0011999233,0.0031362409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044541556,0.0016586449,0.0018257035,0.0033368245,0.0038355999,0.01186196,0.0010462143,0.007186024,0.00020783996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016332401,0.0048404867,0.4498316,0.023313895,0.00512168,0.0032712407,0.23111561,0.0038834189,0.0010583161,0.02395883,0.17124286,0.08072882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038784249,0.00039204597,0.029084323,0.004833776,0.004223658,0.027954038,0.1272263,0.008822176,0.000065096014,0.014844433,0.7739101,0.0047656624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016667947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16233584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6026672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044835326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005943888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405292328","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5022683","title":"Geographic Segment Disclosures and Proprietary Costs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.008905398448310892,"score_gpt":0.2659573945841178,"score_spread":0.2570519961358069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405292328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74975115,0.17054272,0.0009287314,0.04046901,0.0011909758,0.0005469759,0.0000054818966,0.00028007684,0.036284856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95782346,0.033768687,0.000019016861,0.00009176817,0.0005992557,0.000004266845,0.0000010916983,0.000010457737,0.007681981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784446,0.00012031524,0.0001443654,0.00017176228,0.0003423271,0.0013767818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997163,0.000029163826,0.000027020997,0.000063867345,0.00003723137,0.00012644767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018809892,0.00009887748,0.000103104125,0.00010499871,0.0006205848,0.0003471306,0.00016266677,0.00005647021,0.00006992415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023381566,0.00005980168,0.00007454116,0.00021386832,0.00018496093,0.00032392467,0.000026497428,0.0011226356,0.000021725047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015752707,0.000025907897,0.002840902,0.000008376322,0.00012682023,0.000023379822,0.0011388449,6.3927024e-7,0.00009122013,0.8572227,0.00027940882,0.13822608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033772766,0.00040581074,0.0032216026,0.00011393876,0.000082794846,0.00028694846,0.0033174357,0.00008013642,0.0000382398,0.4259135,0.56588566,0.00031616833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021374503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012236089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5656063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004320016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016633036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68280256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405365478","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5019893","title":"Environmental Remediation Obligations in Bankruptcy: The Uncertainty that Remains After Qualex","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Environmental remediation; Business; Environmental science; Actuarial science; Environmental planning; Risk analysis (engineering); Finance; Contamination","score_opus":0.01796665691708621,"score_gpt":0.2798121048501247,"score_spread":0.2618454479330385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405365478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87819374,0.027703075,0.0003637903,0.077832915,0.0025886334,0.001265654,0.00006270247,0.00011561754,0.011873887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680843,0.022045726,0.000017819872,0.00022777134,0.001507566,0.00006555706,0.000022437334,0.000026858086,0.008001965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604267,0.0005792471,0.0004080195,0.00037279233,0.0007880066,0.0018092567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928063,0.00009762709,0.00021019386,0.0002804083,0.000026582999,0.000104542865],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047239223,0.00024488644,0.00023939623,0.00020008287,0.00056305726,0.00038866827,0.00063972553,0.00028992706,0.00029273398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000864388,0.000148098,0.00023499886,0.0002223819,0.0002785934,0.00017463072,0.0002793994,0.0061688623,0.00012193565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018352225,0.00027431402,0.007873469,0.000048644124,0.00048559697,0.000075871845,0.043248203,0.0011510958,0.00009388308,0.8817833,0.0013107667,0.06347133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024337354,0.00005686773,0.0043272106,0.00013332134,0.00008258734,0.000025851943,0.008279916,0.00025286552,0.000008319402,0.9003568,0.08591295,0.00031993515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034013886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14562345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14222205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004550515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049667684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406445511","doi":"10.1016/s0967-0653(97)86442-3","title":"10.1016/s0967-0653(97)86442-3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Value (mathematics); Population; Accounting; Business; Fishery; Biology; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Sociology; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.014934215061390118,"score_gpt":0.21555906349392837,"score_spread":0.20062484843253825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406445511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056955352,0.000086276064,3.0418084e-7,0.0026566794,0.0000030955398,0.00018971968,0.000005916513,0.00015850199,0.99684256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001307373,0.0000013745172,0.000049138205,0.00011649287,0.0004862732,0.000011639754,0.0000043761634,0.000012171743,0.99918777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988875,0.00008992291,0.00013996888,0.00020960851,0.00029924023,0.00037377293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946946,0.00003455541,0.000020103009,0.00018956732,0.000048307607,0.0002380004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003056889,0.00010531803,0.00014037965,0.000043963322,0.000388061,0.00013904118,0.00033709646,0.00007144317,0.9995535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004626029,0.00007688967,0.000060275754,0.00028000536,0.00010619885,0.00019788419,0.000026446494,0.00010681991,0.9996539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033443983,0.00003392888,2.2503766e-8,0.0000012487754,0.0000067358005,0.0000052488526,0.00025732635,0.000004497834,0.000001968335,0.00010857582,0.106678635,0.89286834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013976733,0.0000693259,0.000002101016,0.000008616016,0.000007682566,8.2874584e-7,0.000005277414,0.000019366566,0.00002382733,0.000051538485,0.99951637,0.00015530198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020625126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026838334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89283776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054054424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007907034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.313547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411431470","doi":"10.1002/iir.1572","title":"Miljön i konkurs [The environment in bankruptcy] (1st edition). By Edited by JonatanSchytzer, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB. 2025. pp. 394. SEK 800. ISBN: 978‐91‐39‐03050‐8","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.022394549101532123,"score_gpt":0.3099314220758118,"score_spread":0.2875368729742797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411431470","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022540623,0.5936486,0.0005561542,0.2614134,0.008807597,0.0033082939,0.00095945195,0.00019703155,0.1288554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037006475,0.8483887,0.0002688547,0.019350318,0.0016685901,0.00085662765,0.0011036616,0.00005671808,0.091300085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996267,0.00041176562,0.0009550685,0.00064122933,0.0011942531,0.00053067406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986834,0.00023376511,0.00029316955,0.000438797,0.00018863818,0.00016224752],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001306956,0.0003558303,0.0004974452,0.00012775681,0.00048029586,0.0001660876,0.0014140455,0.0001784962,0.005156142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030053794,0.0002527166,0.0002536501,0.0006464405,0.00037589757,0.00063758454,0.0001778938,0.0006150509,0.0005772182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017733288,0.00039613157,0.00031417995,0.00017997618,0.0001041048,0.000014808505,0.0002698302,0.000004044935,0.00024310942,0.018590467,0.96037865,0.01948699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000466731,0.000042627635,0.0004444849,0.0016714167,0.00005950865,0.0000022403294,0.000075761964,0.00005129975,0.000102714715,0.0011802879,0.99559736,0.00030554575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035095455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006853598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25474006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006525488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000340496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411585679","doi":"10.29173/alr2837","title":"The Coherence of Constructive Takings: A Response to Peter Wills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.01507975426649442,"score_gpt":0.3288493343012665,"score_spread":0.31376958003477207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411585679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059461505,0.042149313,0.0000126164305,0.05325537,0.00042320185,0.0019519388,0.0000051565016,0.000021072665,0.89623517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90763944,0.019656293,0.00020583897,0.017286683,0.00006700892,0.00021346843,9.624392e-7,0.000009886323,0.05492043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987444,0.00048258988,0.000250062,0.0001544736,0.00017386038,0.00019458309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978642,0.001587944,0.00008526625,0.0002634918,0.000138425,0.00006066313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010782152,0.00007897289,0.00023481341,0.000014517557,0.0003708503,0.000044623524,0.0003866135,0.00002983053,0.00020228683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001799557,0.000040436214,0.00007956284,0.0003944823,0.00048292862,0.00008985046,0.00006172834,0.00007607071,0.00007167944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007134947,0.000011938931,0.0000596437,0.00012235869,0.000028403427,0.0000010038657,0.00072155514,4.830112e-8,0.00009863572,0.97217137,0.004839217,0.021874491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063963904,0.000027839917,0.0001932127,0.0019653684,0.000028057118,6.097266e-7,0.000023892606,2.4452424e-7,0.00012362062,0.0009623115,0.99654967,0.00006123529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01802005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022968376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034620898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020094232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99485993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412269918","doi":"","title":"The Rush of Green:the Poseidon Principles","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Gold rush; Rush hour; History; Archaeology; Engineering; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.12063769403493116,"score_gpt":0.3262653927136905,"score_spread":0.20562769867875932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412269918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43120337,0.0031777506,0.00006827944,0.024273187,0.00012832062,0.001412021,0.00008638786,0.00007392845,0.53957677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46729168,0.0012913222,0.000024111761,0.0000115893345,0.000024916904,1.0112522e-7,0.000006410427,0.0000068494883,0.531343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557656,0.0017197038,0.00020077464,0.00031038286,0.0015110972,0.0006814838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965669,0.0014503587,0.00026571724,0.00077555946,0.00074765197,0.00019381763],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056562875,0.00014260985,0.00032255586,0.00015134778,0.0061411695,0.000047622925,0.0033016603,0.00012590848,0.077703804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002493271,0.00009457459,0.00025985515,0.0019213232,0.004379087,0.00040795864,0.0014473115,0.00041432885,0.021210719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006686117,0.00007237483,0.000014490854,0.000056039735,0.00019745709,0.00007070472,0.024889402,0.00006286439,0.0018978678,0.016462056,0.9483343,0.0072738547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049796345,0.00014478657,0.006544936,0.000043047974,0.000045809524,0.0000010950832,0.040138956,0.00022766084,0.0007878972,0.00006908101,0.9513851,0.00011369951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036129814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04332391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056493085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022010593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007492319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413592234","doi":"10.64628/aa.6kcrrh9eh","title":"In NSW there have been significant wins for First Nations land rights. But unprocessed claims still outnumber the successes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Land rights; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.0423542689473227,"score_gpt":0.3238848270846744,"score_spread":0.2815305581373517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413592234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10177631,0.0010861665,0.00065487,0.14539371,0.0023033007,0.007867931,0.0014471891,0.0004040885,0.7390664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9119499,0.00032620784,0.00010247888,0.0004247087,0.00058494834,0.00093631254,0.00011267571,0.000028131422,0.085534655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750423,0.00019028572,0.00046786427,0.0006507432,0.0006524315,0.0005344635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997986,0.0010151652,0.00016994451,0.00045099983,0.00025588326,0.00012199053],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009666883,0.0003160436,0.00041700716,0.00015821827,0.0021180168,0.00046946848,0.0014106187,0.0003559808,0.004671726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021349709,0.00016598652,0.00019554821,0.0003825176,0.00037182143,0.0002650133,0.0004445158,0.00092778326,0.00002383016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023574226,0.0010616495,0.015282926,0.00077078113,0.00040930172,0.00007544345,0.05497062,0.0030316783,0.000019120565,0.90390056,0.019730527,0.0005116537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044038653,0.000036840636,0.0011487493,0.00004931071,0.00006181372,4.563661e-7,0.0024269442,0.0002526191,0.00009283524,0.057948653,0.9371354,0.0004059925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22594343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72159785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028638018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007375482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416423329","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5771324","title":"Public Order and Capricious Wills in Quebec: Some Important Lessons for the Rest of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Common law; Charter; Public law; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Constitutional law; Private law; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.027165051720198185,"score_gpt":0.2887325695700466,"score_spread":0.26156751784984844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416423329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11873766,0.195791,0.0011892534,0.66931486,0.0032894593,0.00340165,0.0002823163,0.000046403522,0.007947412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92029905,0.050664138,0.000024554425,0.00029209733,0.00043233923,0.00003580127,0.0000064148517,0.000012822828,0.028232768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690574,0.00017676574,0.0004869332,0.00024656233,0.00039712628,0.0017868591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988498,0.00024285095,0.00034954218,0.00020621112,0.0002535403,0.00009804854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033241988,0.00017615972,0.00035049248,0.00013048717,0.0006062023,0.00016489874,0.00066496094,0.00017097952,0.000015259118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048179514,0.00010381854,0.00008687379,0.00023921188,0.00018756479,0.00014472558,0.00015008406,0.002235168,8.3496296e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029527502,0.00003714402,0.0007100689,0.000029456804,0.00017694806,0.0000044543867,0.0010509283,0.000053983887,0.0000069352545,0.9859397,0.00094626815,0.011014608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000960368,0.000098106684,0.0021129574,0.00019246241,0.0001170607,0.00001994377,0.007462324,0.00030938152,0.000017150674,0.6844551,0.30381587,0.00043929738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98199624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99975187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8015614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022274838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078764945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416863721","doi":"10.33920/sel-04-2511-01","title":"Cadastral and Market Value of Agricultural Lands and Their Use in Establishing Land Payments and Allocating State and Municipal Lands to Agricultural Producers under Various Rights","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Zemleustrojstvo, kadastr i monitoring zemel' (Land management, cadastre and land monitoring)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agricultural land; Leasehold estate; Land management; Land tenure; Agriculture; Cadastre; Revenue; Profit (economics); Land use","score_opus":0.015762982291660305,"score_gpt":0.2575882963549776,"score_spread":0.24182531406331728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416863721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920609,0.0028728386,0.000024961155,0.00053823716,0.0011262659,0.0012529438,0.00011525634,0.00006034303,0.0019482818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545927,0.0054350253,0.0005673234,0.00002615521,0.00068546145,0.000053634827,0.000025207779,0.00003793313,0.0077100033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950954,0.00036460816,0.0010221688,0.0015055231,0.00060724677,0.0014050516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803203,0.00032705365,0.00038851638,0.00039317313,0.00017476808,0.0006844722],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010272436,0.0010070795,0.001137242,0.00051185134,0.0011968144,0.0016282357,0.0003877606,0.00033435435,0.000007262665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066171204,0.0006722587,0.00008504557,0.00074859493,0.00042374484,0.001420231,0.0010759137,0.0007898702,4.2980756e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034129436,0.00017001227,0.97405654,0.00073016074,0.0006670414,0.000040822648,0.0122162895,0.00026020204,0.00047008152,0.00029318786,0.00019719532,0.01055714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035252918,0.00039385975,0.9723868,0.0020248755,0.00037133275,0.000027374263,0.013414343,0.00013375167,0.0006032164,0.000147374,0.006082267,0.00088951754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041067597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060466635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035020936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001731822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075795884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417492141","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5938298","title":"Administrative Law Wrapped, 2025","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Charter; Administrative law; Supreme court; Nothing; Judicial review; Judicial opinion; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.042216360139646164,"score_gpt":0.35856112082626773,"score_spread":0.31634476068662154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417492141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034528659,0.012989367,0.0021956346,0.022619108,0.0023523094,0.00067251426,0.000041851858,0.00015132423,0.95552504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7402196,0.01823846,0.000105871004,0.00057645235,0.0019710343,0.000022585924,0.000014396057,0.000016243279,0.23883538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951697,0.00048348465,0.0004382548,0.0004193691,0.000601867,0.0028873177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887294,0.00008548434,0.00029560077,0.0002867003,0.0002647675,0.00019452357],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030227625,0.00030658365,0.00042028565,0.00013704394,0.0012935891,0.00041911693,0.0010949721,0.00042545717,0.00026981818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010837666,0.00023103942,0.00033611493,0.00022304275,0.00036242107,0.00019857625,0.00025811786,0.00692684,0.00006517707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047205514,0.00006455027,0.000022170656,0.000013984897,0.00020853925,0.000014121336,0.0011670162,0.000012705947,0.0000024817157,0.9912442,0.0010166222,0.0061864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021694599,0.00009496344,0.0000068786435,0.00007638305,0.00006291301,0.0000145666745,0.0017939898,0.000007497116,0.000026595782,0.54408497,0.4533889,0.00022539948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112367375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107216224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7367667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020553214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029536039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99536425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54839640","doi":"10.29173/alr96","title":"Insurance Law Principles in an International Context: Compensating Losses Caused by Climate Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Context (archaeology); Subsidy; Liability; Loss and damage; Liability insurance; Business; State (computer science); Insurance law; Climate Finance; Economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Public economics; Political science; Law; General insurance; Finance; Economic growth; Developing country; Geography","score_opus":0.08042271661837308,"score_gpt":0.336927511584071,"score_spread":0.25650479496569795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54839640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24207224,0.051085193,0.0000012642967,0.04088508,0.0006881064,0.0034905244,0.000050596904,0.00011282235,0.6616142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600411,0.028026436,0.000026612846,0.010890104,0.00014529879,0.00016889909,0.000031713986,0.000011667818,0.0006581439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858606,0.0002345174,0.00036369744,0.00024911712,0.00024204927,0.00032455235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929315,0.00015351495,0.00013634934,0.00019798413,0.00010613272,0.00011287999],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043517418,0.00013103492,0.00030383558,0.000014410024,0.00025910686,0.00016540024,0.0004184168,0.000049450915,0.001183156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010466399,0.00009158836,0.000050763643,0.00013758945,0.00022207701,0.0013025113,0.000059485887,0.000121990255,0.00025773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018360168,0.00006894758,0.010380501,0.00019431293,0.000007875315,0.0000023734576,0.0010383554,9.023823e-8,0.000028850087,0.9775005,0.00021695845,0.010559398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018342093,0.000021299133,0.0039878893,0.0015822396,0.000006105292,7.526452e-7,0.000034396315,0.00002857164,0.000020106689,0.00016958649,0.99379843,0.00016722176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2955989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4671691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053570006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020572807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55165375","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1041","title":"Standard of Review from Decisions of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Rental housing; Renting; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07541170921499277,"score_gpt":0.3390322300614727,"score_spread":0.2636205208464799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55165375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85259694,0.009806173,0.00002313382,0.040281475,0.00042230796,0.00024317813,0.00010366445,0.000005917309,0.096517235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940895,0.0036882276,0.000076895005,0.0008804982,0.00075032446,1.6102261e-7,2.5040927e-7,0.0000033412923,0.00051081984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988551,0.00015109786,0.0004002617,0.00004771415,0.00042428583,0.000121510966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992622,0.00006782248,0.0003941944,0.00005417109,0.00015931885,0.00006226091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045382476,0.00005663895,0.00032894843,0.000027881426,0.00040212538,0.00002388112,0.00018812696,0.00005250472,0.00027976366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012993343,0.000030574567,0.00019759913,0.000129396,0.00037860777,0.00014155803,0.000033511704,0.00017706538,5.279509e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030106257,0.00042181584,0.0025160247,0.00011263584,0.0003080745,0.000018096196,0.1454404,0.0000011430265,0.00066872797,0.7426575,0.02574702,0.08180752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008342857,0.00017579147,0.0037920168,0.0008858707,0.00013119869,0.000005043393,0.00051461096,8.765094e-7,0.00021217126,0.014298107,0.9790497,0.00010035482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13818365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08540161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9533027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012527012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000293874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9312874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W632841074","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1105","title":"Book Notes: The Meaning of Property: Freedom, Community, and the Legal Imagination, by Jedediah Purdy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Property (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016997465099213255,"score_gpt":0.2670843482335554,"score_spread":0.2500868831343422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W632841074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027317517,0.0034997822,0.00017159703,0.108711526,0.0006209927,0.00042595377,0.0000087164835,0.000035321213,0.88379437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99264,0.0005154865,0.0001725644,0.0019004744,0.0005096696,0.00000639826,0.0000013998424,0.000011991711,0.0042419834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980147,0.00080788584,0.00028992828,0.0000934002,0.0005162372,0.00027788637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.00041981653,0.0002132278,0.00024876167,0.00030125293,0.000124342],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036237768,0.00011921126,0.00019258205,0.000024101413,0.0039105914,0.00060054427,0.00079309987,0.000071699294,0.00034036668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040625298,0.000044324595,0.000080516285,0.0001068005,0.0023297956,0.0006959532,0.0001235731,0.001436148,0.0000067147103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039895065,0.00006577309,0.0000941715,0.0000049974924,0.000035693323,0.0000028035786,0.007996938,0.0000019801623,0.0010748279,0.9741746,0.013078822,0.0034295009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012172111,0.00006123989,0.000060089726,0.000031855812,0.0000489422,0.000084510604,0.0013917951,0.00018282025,0.00057164126,0.051622752,0.94459295,0.00013419078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23172686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2439618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022768876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013012593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W645547363","doi":"","title":"Property rights and duties of redistribution","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Routledge eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Property law; Private property; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.029667924724872872,"score_gpt":0.2531777157714968,"score_spread":0.2235097910466239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W645547363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000387255,0.0009238031,0.00001383391,0.00014884913,0.00029861694,0.00042689353,0.000057157216,0.00007587924,0.99801624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035719767,0.000041251827,0.00002495233,0.000022293125,0.0007681607,0.000011431852,0.000028418377,0.000016482685,0.9633672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985983,0.000103685255,0.00031799974,0.0002977658,0.000394959,0.00028731872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992223,0.000047016605,0.00019480297,0.00022611694,0.00017616381,0.00013361269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030994424,0.00022196847,0.00041071876,0.00008264271,0.0004455429,0.00006646745,0.00023608007,0.00038555948,0.00040907052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003854011,0.00012295422,0.00010496153,0.000027699274,0.0008289029,0.00007860728,0.000071930204,0.00029068106,0.000051005347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003157723,0.000036051606,0.0000059385907,0.00014701295,0.00007602994,0.000021130167,0.0075870138,2.3782151e-8,0.000023081086,0.8010934,0.17464639,0.016332325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018753494,0.00006495879,0.000005025489,0.00018712594,0.00005110604,0.0000019981887,0.000022637842,0.000009596798,0.00011827878,0.05921904,0.9399148,0.00021785848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010256551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009206777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76526845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019720147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003212582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5013928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6889948326","doi":"10.34675/l12274","title":"Sale and transfer of mineral claims in British Columbia.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RoyaltyStat Library","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mineral; Payment; Transfer (computing); Production (economics)","score_opus":0.008004973072806893,"score_gpt":0.21249792401304962,"score_spread":0.20449295094024272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6889948326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490578,0.00046186981,0.0000014681028,0.00064392766,0.00010256175,0.00022413608,0.000025521436,0.0000357849,0.049446907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413904,0.00023165187,0.00008859167,0.00021451588,0.000059994367,0.0000040009786,0.000009521409,0.000010359078,0.057990976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921244,0.00008765521,0.00017239542,0.00016466323,0.00015006441,0.00021275523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977297,0.000037512455,0.000015283153,0.00008195006,0.000009126568,0.000083158746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011652083,0.00004428475,0.00017057016,0.000028091074,0.000060676037,0.00017156127,0.0001282817,0.00006654539,0.0021120259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040134346,0.0000560002,0.000032950757,0.00017401575,0.00012612967,0.00059740106,0.000025164287,0.000087020235,0.0000137108555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004362322,0.00017753549,0.9345353,0.00014633751,0.000017490218,0.00006499907,0.0052853078,0.000006453724,0.00048188106,0.010084876,0.021437477,0.027718697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014929946,0.0001608809,0.43912455,0.00016925762,0.0000066586217,0.0000037285806,0.00090742554,0.00014281982,0.00008763875,0.0038573954,0.5537616,0.00028503605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052215885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082129695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53232414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008530465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001132667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6891722915","doi":"10.4324/9780203712153-8/work-ownership-estair-van-wagner","title":"The Work of Ownership: Shaping Contestation in Ontario’s Aggregate Extraction Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Private property; Process (computing); Property (philosophy); Aggregate (composite); Property rights; Space (punctuation); Centrality; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.056614758229918107,"score_gpt":0.30946360291829605,"score_spread":0.2528488446883779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6891722915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8599946,0.00064712897,0.00006025369,0.008052899,0.00091177376,0.00045309696,0.0000022800089,0.000050251372,0.12982774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849357,0.00010537217,0.000099096884,0.000093071336,0.00014255845,0.000015476011,0.0000021989072,0.0000061838855,0.014600322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893355,0.00012870129,0.0002306565,0.00016405572,0.00027830384,0.00026473677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909836,0.0001718947,0.00026317098,0.00029616136,0.00008117062,0.0000892563],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009407828,0.000084404135,0.00013207954,0.000023193717,0.0014699023,0.00041847932,0.00042002284,0.00006944374,0.00016885894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000479448,0.000050643826,0.000053781292,0.000071427254,0.00041079122,0.0008166348,0.000038452046,0.00027771914,0.000041264724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024850277,0.00012105176,0.18242602,0.00001654377,0.000040387156,0.00002568882,0.010034386,0.0000281857,0.0008051407,0.7499475,0.0008487817,0.055457823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056370406,0.000041780455,0.3331015,0.00025524918,0.000011136111,5.758948e-7,0.0007480179,0.00003730121,0.0005935525,0.010498395,0.65395945,0.00018934027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61024857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9508632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7394491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018213832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018159002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904905063","doi":"10.14288/1.0226309","title":"Regulations for sale of lands in the provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Work (physics); Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.029992476110524465,"score_gpt":0.2909934445422567,"score_spread":0.2610009684317322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904905063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07593421,0.000057968926,0.00024047344,0.013928383,0.00012647468,0.0023138777,0.00008387416,0.0000083967325,0.9073063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8017111,0.000018722525,0.00021143648,0.00001697834,0.000031124662,0.00008163404,8.323321e-7,0.0000019927506,0.19792618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959975,0.000065125074,0.000113466696,0.00007327177,0.000071841074,0.000076564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994751,0.0003254356,0.000048510166,0.0000809802,0.000053992513,0.000015954018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032161849,0.000029645327,0.00008061139,0.000025684107,0.0006970339,0.00009107044,0.00018795826,0.000023936958,0.0000837274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009569823,0.000013964268,0.000018897024,0.0003188307,0.00014180802,0.0001538072,0.00002427169,0.000017581257,2.9494387e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073692395,0.001858013,0.059018813,0.00013619834,0.00023109747,0.0000018214257,0.15559722,0.000018822668,0.0043933904,0.282757,0.4370776,0.058173068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001073875,0.0002250943,0.010681426,0.00006914231,0.000025748905,0.000001275891,0.016587453,0.000030143476,0.0007229139,0.018103397,0.9523766,0.00010290827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35603252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9187839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7257769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002014734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020335248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6482557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904916963","doi":"10.14288/1.0222240","title":"The land laws of British Columbia : together with Land Office forms &amp; regulations. 1873","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Land use; Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.02083974534412091,"score_gpt":0.2634785663686073,"score_spread":0.24263882102448636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904916963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032639787,0.000059759117,0.00018166244,0.0029690028,0.00012447,0.00076164963,0.00009272944,0.000036935344,0.963134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14679463,0.00010380754,0.00017896843,0.00003547591,0.000060684473,0.000056747664,0.0000017607854,0.000006847449,0.8527611],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993044,0.000083053084,0.00013006564,0.00012968223,0.00017946228,0.0001733097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937856,0.00015784251,0.0000673303,0.00017294065,0.00016605509,0.000057252095],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037133112,0.000040242056,0.00010009581,0.000009413178,0.003957226,0.001406024,0.00029155106,0.00004166219,0.001510404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007548758,0.000024792584,0.000028188984,0.0005307999,0.00027956977,0.0002826376,0.00004940906,0.000047454145,0.000013005625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009723404,0.00012687201,0.014666573,0.0000032988405,0.00007877808,0.00000178881,0.0006011155,0.0000053366134,0.000027390055,0.0015258319,0.97012335,0.012742416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047426135,0.00004754958,0.007279945,0.000037423808,0.000011598527,0.000004921827,0.000108665634,0.000001993035,0.0000044006165,0.0020989352,0.9898576,0.00007270292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6992793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29078537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004905413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025317198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927317237","doi":"10.34675/l14223","title":"Exclusive option to acquire a l00% undivided right, title and interest in and to one mineral property claim located in Coleman Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RoyaltyStat Library","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Real property; Payment; Property law; Property rights; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03570393344660213,"score_gpt":0.263810183150917,"score_spread":0.22810624970431484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927317237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553624,0.000062615545,0.00001453153,0.003907879,0.00009393167,0.0005481583,0.000011608253,0.000035669622,0.039963238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91835576,0.00001039594,0.00033523043,0.000647055,0.00004666149,0.000014769126,0.000024920379,0.00001219182,0.080553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991156,0.00009141626,0.00017291217,0.00026625226,0.00011325723,0.00024054878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996748,0.000031901964,0.000026675865,0.00010144402,0.000013426363,0.00015173572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013946698,0.00010325005,0.00017748008,0.00014307663,0.000076372504,0.00013653384,0.00012382728,0.00007302392,0.0017611538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018545874,0.0000675837,0.000013649939,0.00023727426,0.000038546466,0.00041556603,0.0001636806,0.00010658623,0.00010151434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067438575,0.000497845,0.7788135,0.00023980491,0.00005502213,0.00019835407,0.10770561,0.00013199466,0.0008226288,0.030962655,0.05928837,0.02060984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010438198,0.0002561584,0.2770208,0.0005846613,0.0000055180867,0.0000014629393,0.0011509213,0.0003405406,0.00009720738,0.0010571384,0.7180629,0.00037889116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006214925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19020846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6587745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046228448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012329489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927791270","doi":"10.34675/l3954","title":"Exclusive mineral rights option to acquire the entire right, title and interest in the Dalhousie Claim, which includes any mineral leases or other interests.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RoyaltyStat Library","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mineral; Mineral exploration; Mineral resource classification; Legislation","score_opus":0.03494180526358541,"score_gpt":0.2918006803904317,"score_spread":0.2568588751268463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927791270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81853944,0.0002584925,0.0000050733174,0.010067801,0.00033873922,0.0005050197,0.0000212065,0.000056586417,0.17020766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90628093,0.000026465974,0.000066566434,0.0017637935,0.00039249833,0.000016497503,0.000011916527,0.000014630345,0.091426685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998959,0.0002361271,0.0001656093,0.00022352043,0.00015772817,0.00025801235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995361,0.00011308387,0.000045469136,0.00021218964,0.000016106398,0.00007706011],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015534581,0.00013118984,0.00014041318,0.0000705228,0.00024979038,0.00025163172,0.00043505066,0.000069439055,0.0032082149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001899164,0.000055759127,0.000036385063,0.00028362972,0.0001235676,0.0004990415,0.00015517011,0.00014316395,0.0002832575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075806625,0.0004588966,0.015745332,0.00013183996,0.00009492776,0.00016637033,0.060699027,0.000026020027,0.00085598667,0.46804398,0.44293514,0.0100844195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002541698,0.000106119536,0.0059866603,0.00009445524,0.000007539949,0.0000042765146,0.00082839327,0.00015792563,0.00008188127,0.00227739,0.9900477,0.0001535206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010369411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008357714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5471125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017467457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081411235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6961129964","doi":"10.14288/1.0370684","title":"An Act for consolidating in one Act certain provisions usually inserted in Acts authorizing the taking of Lands for undertakings of a Public nature. Whereas It is expedient to establish certain conditions and provisions upon and in accordance with which Land required for undertakings or works of a public nature may be acquired and the manner of obtaining compensation for the same...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Legislation; Land consolidation; Legislature; Public use","score_opus":0.10019522564142866,"score_gpt":0.375484519187208,"score_spread":0.27528929354577936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6961129964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198525,0.00020805286,0.00549269,0.05288631,0.00013577635,0.018449288,0.0004037204,0.000023319904,0.0025483673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469054,0.000035470264,0.002827481,0.00029499936,0.00004229774,0.0014832907,0.00004037051,0.000023387596,0.00056219473],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800986,0.00033615791,0.00060696225,0.00039708102,0.00024492593,0.00040502218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936466,0.004381812,0.00067512196,0.00024845757,0.00096377864,0.00008423443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031733236,0.00018292482,0.00050980557,0.0003007084,0.001927886,0.0007121472,0.00045258625,0.00023205215,0.000013318247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045175995,0.00009916547,0.000045421788,0.0021718368,0.0004720372,0.00091542274,0.00011911707,0.00023910015,4.571339e-9],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03925847,0.0034994546,0.042189162,0.0016151196,0.0014674197,0.0000021258281,0.5051579,0.0007777772,0.0123930145,0.35779825,0.008437389,0.02740392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.064012095,0.010962622,0.07269113,0.0091501735,0.0009353313,0.000028333594,0.50468904,0.2457814,0.0033481715,0.033647303,0.052646734,0.002107644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018711336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60141784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5827065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099208824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009624786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6979791231","doi":"","title":"After the Revolution: Being Pragmatic and Functional in Canada's Trial\\nCourts and Courts of Appeal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Standard of review; Judicial review","score_opus":0.01543662959929202,"score_gpt":0.22529111395517004,"score_spread":0.20985448435587803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6979791231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366323,0.003175141,0.00001071441,0.0115560265,0.00043049207,0.0005873062,0.000009704064,0.000016182716,0.047582176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639106,0.0001799071,0.000038742884,0.00043955952,0.00026654493,0.000024460162,8.7567497e-7,0.000004474019,0.0026543674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989228,0.00017482415,0.00021425656,0.00015053734,0.0003316522,0.00020592043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995621,0.00011460376,0.000063756896,0.000109346474,0.000040559895,0.00010967175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054139853,0.00007833341,0.00014885406,0.00002267095,0.0002843458,0.00005222891,0.00007656801,0.000042212956,0.0006393797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010070663,0.000048972946,0.000019909761,0.000107641165,0.00021748892,0.0001911676,0.000032024793,0.00015077197,0.00000516782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004428335,0.00043871507,0.0794386,0.000315371,0.00018452066,0.00020286108,0.014599944,0.00009095253,0.00012892736,0.80530566,0.07173708,0.023129033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008663374,0.00013872166,0.073369004,0.00022324092,0.00004871552,0.000016861066,0.0009973374,0.0007159225,0.000016706945,0.011858731,0.9035804,0.00037093158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7547857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9577161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013323395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022388408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7000759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986631850","doi":"","title":"Property Rights and the Public Interest: Why <i>Annapolis Group v Halifax Regional Municipality</i> is Wrongly Decided","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; De facto; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Private property; Property rights; Property law; Certainty","score_opus":0.04301092555500766,"score_gpt":0.2925902481220232,"score_spread":0.24957932256701557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986631850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07158556,0.004662052,0.00013962183,0.34529972,0.0012169918,0.001705234,0.000045608675,0.0003731753,0.57497203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158112,0.00029387505,0.00014156968,0.028025148,0.0004665474,0.0000958708,0.000015382815,0.0000153853,0.055135045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970771,0.0008051067,0.00043718863,0.0005306879,0.00050383515,0.00064607547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984208,0.00026242633,0.00011986662,0.0006330428,0.00021678672,0.00034707945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015568321,0.0002624402,0.00038850476,0.000089329966,0.002021808,0.00088995555,0.0010083576,0.00019155936,0.0007189336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027012877,0.00012099419,0.00017684612,0.00054294,0.002088448,0.0008579238,0.00028540898,0.0005106834,0.000114324044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011352486,0.00006862537,0.0002323278,0.000013319357,0.000068438334,0.0000076039005,0.001532837,8.121542e-8,0.000017077686,0.8682947,0.12882751,0.000823938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013517822,0.000031159532,0.00012896257,0.00008259165,0.000034599936,0.0000039926163,0.00023986478,0.00003898603,0.000066599634,0.0783453,0.91946274,0.00021344915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1652852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28314188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84422565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012457256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023325878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989233867","doi":"","title":"Accounting for Risk: The Advent of Capped Conveyancing Title Insurance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conveyancing; Freehold; Insurance policy; Work (physics); Reinsurance; Casualty insurance","score_opus":0.022369508232320173,"score_gpt":0.24423726782908028,"score_spread":0.2218677595967601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989233867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92522997,0.00052301044,0.0007482833,0.003173013,0.00016107205,0.00023720862,0.000025920353,0.000082780374,0.06981872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955275,0.00006444666,0.0005122931,0.000008475174,0.000021536587,1.5731351e-7,5.986226e-7,0.0000017936109,0.0038631884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972653,0.0000141026985,0.000047472306,0.000057814457,0.000071535695,0.00008256477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971193,0.000020082416,0.00007863376,0.000084701845,0.000089025416,0.00001564458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023676266,0.000028965425,0.00007883133,0.00004192578,0.00016882607,0.0000037431105,0.00020131412,0.000059122314,0.00005427649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006175117,0.000020183892,0.00002745053,0.00013110424,0.0002732629,0.000046703528,0.000028065331,0.00006322816,0.00000995803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038144522,0.00026081645,0.26179537,0.00012267154,0.00026577045,0.0000145730255,0.025019119,0.000049799197,0.0013868025,0.4439135,0.062189233,0.2046009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036933692,0.000033180062,0.0019388653,0.000014565042,0.000012271951,2.6742154e-7,0.0021866674,0.00005184962,0.00038789117,0.0024627876,0.9924985,0.000043829135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023989347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084118184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93030924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002063643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008154914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36264876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989305868","doi":"","title":"1820, April 24, 03 Stat. 566, Act Making Further Provision for Sale of Public Land","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - CSUMB (California State University, Monterey Bay)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Public land; Public interest; Legislation; Public access; Public policy","score_opus":0.04347716119120237,"score_gpt":0.2582935779844333,"score_spread":0.21481641679323094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989305868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106996,0.00012505696,0.010640598,0.008494981,0.00036482836,0.001560307,0.006910129,0.0003759863,0.16082855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870107,0.000065571956,0.0001746424,0.00005455107,0.00005882415,0.0000021829335,0.000058709462,0.000030254905,0.012544526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806786,0.00015531591,0.00030524516,0.00040014533,0.0004145884,0.0006568713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985687,0.00028574056,0.00023244804,0.00035306806,0.00029372703,0.00026632554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035926935,0.00024302735,0.0003578423,0.00024187834,0.00049434364,0.00030211674,0.00071415125,0.00011021431,0.0001521844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001709527,0.00016583504,0.00022123412,0.00032176386,0.0004646154,0.0014710642,0.000316965,0.00012983108,0.00008378451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026093307,0.0018333187,0.54719925,0.00027777033,0.00065854745,0.00019436465,0.009651301,0.000013823471,0.0008639907,0.043303378,0.021645568,0.37174934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018101793,0.00027778881,0.0034437478,0.00013519844,0.000030248888,0.0000018010652,0.0009370015,0.00008317521,0.00009693025,0.0024965375,0.9903037,0.0003837016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009596754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011508311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96865815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002537134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023507944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67625564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989372279","doi":"","title":"Are Royalty Agreements Required For\\nCanada East Coast Offshore Oil And Gas?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Submarine pipeline; Nova scotia; East coast; Production (economics); Petroleum industry; Oil production","score_opus":0.034309354716604026,"score_gpt":0.27658795397736163,"score_spread":0.24227859926075762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989372279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6545168,0.001954792,0.000069723974,0.028402077,0.001237775,0.0005642511,0.00017117249,0.00027063992,0.31281275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91876733,0.00040221508,0.00025347804,0.0020474242,0.00085497537,0.000049560098,0.000020895723,0.000023769455,0.07758033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816614,0.000106730506,0.00026338673,0.00038856643,0.00046377402,0.0006114097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989003,0.00004277309,0.00015459357,0.0002617277,0.00015263801,0.0004879667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004677101,0.0001871985,0.00026788362,0.000038016056,0.0011098684,0.00025037178,0.00032798093,0.00011752333,0.00058090687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016056499,0.0001447899,0.00007573146,0.00021057136,0.00029722328,0.00043108538,0.000074664895,0.00016970599,0.00006289931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008585678,0.00069192384,0.13168901,0.00031114326,0.0003662095,0.0004663006,0.0071599106,0.000028503993,0.0007271533,0.3813257,0.25735334,0.21902224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080079155,0.00005341055,0.0032520161,0.0000750096,0.000021422728,0.0000037564635,0.0010475043,0.000042970878,0.000034483444,0.0018504671,0.9925685,0.0002496979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059163168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4951896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7352151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013155844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001514975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94710195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989482237","doi":"","title":"Avalanche trade Duchene to Senators, Predators get Turris","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Government (linguistics); Falling (accident)","score_opus":0.020700789096614183,"score_gpt":0.2811413796641602,"score_spread":0.26044059056754604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989482237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003302903,0.0005755926,0.0015827978,0.0021120433,0.0024070973,0.001490228,0.001174058,0.0006351793,0.9896927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026814254,0.0005604449,0.0015531052,0.00080391724,0.0034423943,0.00012753448,0.00038397693,0.0005635473,0.9657508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945898,0.0007950035,0.0006349526,0.0015425093,0.0010115053,0.0014262011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966477,0.00024316927,0.0006149698,0.0013550702,0.00003460336,0.00110447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005714727,0.0009867569,0.0011340835,0.0007984696,0.00023928186,0.0006232555,0.0036050885,0.00041630893,0.014065136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033179854,0.00077744236,0.00060258876,0.00013535269,0.0012207255,0.00021168243,0.0009967356,0.0012470373,0.003518161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013522469,0.00014425075,0.00038194124,0.000078713805,0.00044069,0.00019370399,0.014908525,8.5968696e-7,0.000076290584,0.013135736,0.96785355,0.0026505438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055147597,0.00025500538,0.00036804058,0.0013699436,0.00010073795,0.000016339658,0.00011772714,0.00007083686,0.00024438754,0.0013828244,0.9944519,0.0010708201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18129991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25941506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07811514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016950785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038720298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6993157405","doi":"","title":"Notes from the periphery: finding more than (non)ownership in property law?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Property (philosophy); Assertion; Indigenous; Public property; Property law; Private property; Property rights; Space (punctuation)","score_opus":0.04240599340427809,"score_gpt":0.2887694600608076,"score_spread":0.24636346665652953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6993157405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6247663,0.0022746795,0.000020332465,0.06430386,0.0008736728,0.0006442594,0.000047769805,0.00018401453,0.30688512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97855395,0.0000931883,0.00025863954,0.0042363093,0.0009402188,0.000035848563,0.000022470545,0.000022021968,0.015837355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780756,0.00041587293,0.00026502172,0.0004479625,0.0004981101,0.00056549505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892765,0.00026706659,0.0000672536,0.00043667635,0.00009409267,0.00020726814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007040271,0.00019177282,0.00026692453,0.000018467239,0.0009821093,0.0005239351,0.0005930226,0.00015868532,0.0018871923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004049138,0.00009398886,0.00012159597,0.0004302705,0.00045037322,0.0005217811,0.00013829317,0.0005204335,0.00027436708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017124019,0.00048566394,0.0943246,0.000049194503,0.00016536763,0.00064032176,0.05530538,0.000063948966,0.0057830433,0.81240016,0.009030652,0.021580426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004925249,0.000028355498,0.011713059,0.00014014893,0.000018167117,0.0000018054689,0.0040252674,0.000066872984,0.0021613878,0.0034634639,0.97757673,0.0003122082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23607096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37234533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015451538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037238377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998565543","doi":"","title":"An analytical index to the act 20th Victoriae, cap. XLIV., amending the judicature acts of Lower Canada.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.007818340206857144,"score_gpt":0.21257976322630834,"score_spread":0.2047614230194512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998565543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1388763,0.000014674703,0.00021373892,0.70201564,0.0007381668,0.0005155686,0.00004138211,0.00013669304,0.15744786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95171183,0.000033513887,0.000059762333,0.0011588593,0.0003686373,2.2716708e-7,0.000005402027,0.000011229931,0.046650514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830735,0.00039795347,0.00010072113,0.0002688398,0.00051996455,0.00040520148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886376,0.00018740297,0.000091215974,0.00044862804,0.000057447403,0.0003515692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021614456,0.00014615778,0.00019823536,0.00008347641,0.000802507,0.00011657791,0.0011589348,0.00011468151,0.0005090739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080917314,0.00008310206,0.000071943345,0.0007991569,0.00025699666,0.0008128,0.00017382998,0.00034315392,0.000011855511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022119781,0.00009902444,0.010855611,0.000010039521,0.000094177776,0.00004974885,0.005453354,0.00018782406,0.0000114364375,0.2940259,0.6884951,0.00049656583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012974061,0.00007346096,0.012716403,0.000015126555,0.000027751981,7.445857e-8,0.0016865853,0.000049109818,0.00010738929,0.00009909479,0.9849484,0.00014685758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6896053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.443661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8128356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014031818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009367746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6172316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998890373","doi":"","title":"Beneficial Interests Under the Chattels Real Act","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.04495838495947105,"score_gpt":0.3094161888029288,"score_spread":0.26445780384345774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998890373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5057183,0.0031909961,0.000017397904,0.16103002,0.008575348,0.0006516866,0.000075335476,0.00045402598,0.32028687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81314915,0.0021171707,0.000018846951,0.00303041,0.004448885,0.000025355317,0.000017549377,0.00003831119,0.1771543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968464,0.0005008905,0.00041078744,0.00050784607,0.0006981382,0.0010359798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985722,0.00028268146,0.0001323333,0.0005200448,0.00010429799,0.00038846134],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172261,0.00030681663,0.00033324308,0.00006224348,0.0015058842,0.00049053825,0.00096947816,0.0002969393,0.0049455827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000789232,0.0001919441,0.00024828454,0.0010776527,0.0010444325,0.00065426464,0.0002801571,0.0007162325,0.011599244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034791155,0.00008090647,0.00033842213,0.000025212887,0.00007796146,0.000055053995,0.002234744,0.00008175582,0.00013475318,0.9470704,0.035337675,0.014528288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003300827,0.00010351666,0.007882331,0.00011186094,0.00004937374,0.0000048603683,0.0012063648,0.00016823062,0.00016483373,0.0240085,0.96562934,0.00034071013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07975458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10362334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93029165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023172198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029870166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999174443","doi":"","title":"Biodiversity and Conservation : Cross-Border Legal and Regulatory Perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Biodiversity; Corporate governance; Constitution; Wildlife; Environmental law; Biodiversity conservation; Subject (documents); Environmental governance","score_opus":0.018941158163848597,"score_gpt":0.2932666020930865,"score_spread":0.2743254439292379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999174443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9120523,0.00020831943,0.00010021431,0.0032911438,0.00010648851,0.000107460684,0.000015332907,0.00004413857,0.084074646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8929669,0.00021168507,0.0003041663,0.00041900662,0.00010094845,2.4766274e-7,0.000006043711,0.000005759538,0.10598523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988689,0.00015752649,0.00009450593,0.00042670872,0.00018666024,0.00026574492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999336,0.000041832936,0.00005606543,0.00019325467,0.00020714794,0.00016567616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016959259,0.00012982554,0.0001805318,0.00010958808,0.0005755501,0.00022572918,0.000112642614,0.000106594365,0.0012324584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029069435,0.00012548675,0.00004118336,0.00027465032,0.0005646741,0.0007608809,0.00024411832,0.00015322422,0.00008023644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000203004,0.00011910775,0.8953841,0.000049778566,0.00011441842,0.0006451668,0.015920026,8.971753e-8,0.0004174026,0.07901885,0.00078605174,0.0073420135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054224837,0.000012316904,0.4759517,0.000013253222,0.000016590042,0.000016960877,0.0048497887,0.000012423443,0.00008199726,0.000047799276,0.5183204,0.00013454122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011516088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023078916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5175343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008269544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012500324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000298253","doi":"","title":"Federal Systems, Covenantal Theory and Common Property","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Politics; Individualism; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Political philosophy; Democracy; Liberal democracy","score_opus":0.00836400279717377,"score_gpt":0.1893230281063919,"score_spread":0.18095902530921812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000298253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36554614,0.00032307467,0.000004207075,0.0016318843,0.00019827395,0.0003043389,0.00005895443,0.00010191614,0.6318312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89677525,0.000023384311,0.000006414754,0.000072821065,0.000065692824,1.7410586e-7,0.0000061780365,0.000006681774,0.103043415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888813,0.00035269948,0.00015208338,0.00017642538,0.00021016427,0.00022047565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993553,0.0000944624,0.00011517111,0.00026380143,0.000020977246,0.00015026136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010038557,0.00012174071,0.0001986753,0.000093728355,0.0010025764,0.0003757995,0.00062681217,0.00008280959,0.000009642517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016779708,0.00006931306,0.000108265995,0.00029990828,0.000549133,0.0017514644,0.0001737829,0.00015622018,0.0000040052523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065217866,0.0004734479,0.14311406,0.00005862214,0.00014284914,0.00041495907,0.0029852432,0.000018650344,0.0002938952,0.83037156,0.010297386,0.011177124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004249593,0.00018448227,0.019401437,0.00014841196,0.000030899875,0.000037045036,0.0016107942,0.000027223845,0.0007666827,0.0020197218,0.9750616,0.00028672235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004776951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049833438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96476424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004570633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001657369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77111083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001562921","doi":"","title":"La proprieta aborigena tra esclusivita e sovranita","year":2016,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Padua Research Archive (University of Padova)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Domain name; Tacking; Domain (mathematical analysis)","score_opus":0.06406497584400998,"score_gpt":0.3196342033700237,"score_spread":0.2555692275260137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001562921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021378506,0.0010239019,0.19583647,0.07715323,0.0006622521,0.003251951,0.001466164,0.00024539832,0.6989821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87535757,0.007962905,0.0129752,0.000048979888,0.0005300947,0.0000026467883,0.000019722687,0.000056394303,0.1030465],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914239,0.0036447174,0.00027770578,0.00088235276,0.0022739826,0.001497325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958173,0.0017242057,0.0001881427,0.0007501542,0.0007432397,0.0007769694],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004838952,0.00030375514,0.0005472972,0.0005960788,0.0022136562,0.00011257309,0.0021436317,0.0002753019,0.0050274874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006018952,0.00022379597,0.0003544164,0.0012533021,0.0063115484,0.0008170398,0.0009809224,0.0010171019,0.0012968394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018618288,0.0015784821,0.0022156602,0.00040553213,0.0006849406,0.0012135006,0.08950784,0.0000015828111,0.40862858,0.10187683,0.04461587,0.34740934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021583878,0.0007372469,0.009431323,0.00053810223,0.00006565091,0.0000067816145,0.014043213,0.0013749016,0.00017927695,0.025677843,0.94527256,0.0005147265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016926361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007618406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030068637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015336158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009238467","doi":"","title":"The Durability of Terra Nullius: Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.032411397525443746,"score_gpt":0.27433616918010056,"score_spread":0.2419247716546568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009238467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79712695,0.00078422617,0.000008731798,0.003483301,0.00059368095,0.000513412,0.000015642092,0.00006839909,0.19740564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865702,0.00008355903,0.00007520908,0.00017261683,0.00024564363,0.00002241278,0.000003473015,0.0000068928443,0.012820034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983691,0.00034265305,0.0003098798,0.00020590582,0.00048032263,0.00029216651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991729,0.000105574196,0.00009338458,0.00023422141,0.0002118846,0.00018203429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020091862,0.00006104313,0.00015984956,0.000011754044,0.0004718622,0.00048528737,0.0003790094,0.000091016766,0.00050305034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008255384,0.00005674385,0.000057754838,0.00026738725,0.00047394406,0.00039679403,0.000047348567,0.00018699902,0.00005702536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002608824,0.0012262594,0.25592768,0.00009917696,0.00010168539,0.00008652774,0.015080549,0.0000662482,0.000620121,0.4289346,0.2022635,0.095332794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069135166,0.00006351028,0.037465256,0.000044887678,0.0000062387803,0.0000019696756,0.0010261566,0.000041597916,0.00005715251,0.02564991,0.9347988,0.0001532077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64681065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92134297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73253524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017461437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002758774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55080485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009388294","doi":"","title":"Doctrinal reform and post-contractual modifications in New Brunswick: Nav Canada v. Greater Fredericton Airport Authority Inc.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Liability; Context (archaeology); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.011634700686370913,"score_gpt":0.2117169023539463,"score_spread":0.2000822016675754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009388294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8397418,0.000046358153,0.000079597005,0.0032617748,0.00036739584,0.00025939307,0.000046430847,0.000038430804,0.1561588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98734564,0.000022805838,0.00009014801,0.00006877919,0.0002162168,3.4135482e-7,0.000039859067,0.0000047195126,0.012211494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855727,0.0000597181,0.0002655052,0.00030689943,0.00050082244,0.00030978266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903303,0.000084148654,0.00014608279,0.00023936653,0.00023605944,0.00026128913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020510254,0.00017211343,0.00023103025,0.00009564631,0.001140621,0.000115583585,0.00038349844,0.00015776744,0.0000635452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009114652,0.00012885271,0.00007033513,0.00018571514,0.0009367571,0.0007676273,0.00008344716,0.00044413467,0.00000851894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008244767,0.00033749352,0.27728987,0.000042834938,0.00018145489,0.0007595635,0.009782605,0.00008737386,0.00094431813,0.695706,0.005250362,0.008793653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000794101,0.00006424019,0.6048515,0.00003381648,0.000029721234,0.00009584123,0.0016075119,0.000090742054,0.00009431844,0.0004919729,0.39157432,0.0002719332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9295161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69521403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003735437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006593124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010320016","doi":"","title":"How Has Dunsmuir Worked? A Legal- Empirical Analysis of Substantive Review of Administrative Decisions after Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick: Findings from the Federal Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Set (abstract data type); Judicial review; Focus (optics); Centrality; Standard of review","score_opus":0.0972193804624586,"score_gpt":0.35957383535376525,"score_spread":0.26235445489130665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010320016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82435876,0.023575615,0.00042607493,0.12754448,0.0005147665,0.0013279365,0.00029411717,0.00007150258,0.021886734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98369676,0.0036835135,0.00048990163,0.0017799214,0.00031428647,0.000015560763,0.000024197676,0.000017324466,0.009978527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685293,0.00045128766,0.0006309412,0.0005392272,0.0010356389,0.00048996235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671805,0.0007482242,0.0006142016,0.0010733147,0.00042620796,0.0004200269],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010531718,0.00029696364,0.0009877979,0.00007847612,0.0016938457,0.0010461425,0.0013226708,0.0001925633,0.0016698425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020088498,0.00017168038,0.00066810724,0.00063300115,0.0015687648,0.0009808778,0.000183981,0.0004510241,0.000033537668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018499017,0.0012077255,0.40295312,0.00029062072,0.0075976453,0.00044858598,0.036421962,0.0000070836745,0.0004153968,0.38263825,0.15674515,0.009424566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006905294,0.00013851766,0.2603791,0.002403177,0.0012073679,0.0000013172194,0.0011017157,0.000019890798,0.00046960966,0.0018000962,0.73135257,0.00043612556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08233034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2935225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5746074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090353984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017723083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010367632","doi":"","title":"An inconsistency in the Canadian law of adverse possession? Nelson (City) v Mowatt 2017 SCC 8","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Common law; High Court; Jurisprudence; Legal history","score_opus":0.07092524141209065,"score_gpt":0.32468545153167083,"score_spread":0.25376021011958017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010367632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4580573,0.000013359963,0.0000719554,0.0043872097,0.00006433548,0.00055084325,0.00019668807,0.000018259354,0.53664005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416775,0.0005286093,0.0007332388,0.000039618084,0.000045226305,1.677118e-7,0.000029771514,0.000008150394,0.0044474597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963921,0.0011581446,0.00015400494,0.0004428308,0.0009926867,0.0008602661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736637,0.00024960583,0.00023304425,0.0010605564,0.0004973026,0.0005931321],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341405,0.00016874928,0.0003458409,0.0008137439,0.007353768,0.00009500991,0.0042598103,0.00017898856,0.00033056404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018588283,0.00015475092,0.00018257172,0.0005860807,0.0047374414,0.0019084171,0.0005396334,0.00078349875,0.000007701596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010281375,0.000537631,0.1056521,0.000066678534,0.000091274094,0.0011883131,0.04675442,0.000024525882,0.0003407629,0.8379684,0.0018359098,0.0045118583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015570763,0.00047433792,0.1973311,0.00014166378,0.000037889527,0.0000031207887,0.075229436,0.000360883,0.000026420881,0.010368999,0.7141482,0.0003208481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87496036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8275994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004178145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020014485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014248724","doi":"","title":"Ontario Hit With Lawsuit Challenging ‘Ag-Gag’ Legislation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Supreme court","score_opus":0.027129647101620386,"score_gpt":0.2593591559814583,"score_spread":0.23222950887983793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014248724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09275523,0.0007435024,0.00032506004,0.0076088645,0.00042181008,0.00023803656,0.000003966418,0.0001751705,0.8977284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846922,0.000060337487,0.0005976919,0.0007150179,0.00055427547,0.000014551343,0.000014267302,0.000015352367,0.113336325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837416,0.00013520876,0.00018717731,0.00034903106,0.0005101259,0.0004442985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992035,0.000045776538,0.00006745779,0.00027712432,0.00016697437,0.00023918059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038364794,0.0001461445,0.0002001335,0.00003084117,0.00089912844,0.00031307363,0.00021588309,0.00010385658,0.0041107414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051257,0.0001092289,0.000069244896,0.00024865707,0.0001529543,0.00066367723,0.00004971789,0.0003489295,0.00043364562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032180546,0.00009499549,0.0043743686,0.000011234964,0.00005433995,0.00016665936,0.0063636797,0.00005531917,0.00020321045,0.98399067,0.0013755129,0.003277841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041568885,0.000043490494,0.0028001592,0.000050079503,0.000017086677,0.0000064915444,0.0005005767,0.000016100092,0.00027881525,0.0028223232,0.9928199,0.0002293128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22432439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90076363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99144435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030879988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005535228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99679965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017283238","doi":"","title":"Base Visit Book Niagara Falls International Airport ARS, 27 June 2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Navy; Canadian Armed Forces","keywords":"International airport; Pacific islanders; Population; Base (topology); Race (biology)","score_opus":0.011677250577989046,"score_gpt":0.1878744961009461,"score_spread":0.17619724552295704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017283238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0138666425,0.00055072305,0.00012616956,0.0034911435,0.0006019225,0.0008357795,0.005907691,0.0003806806,0.97423923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009292568,0.0031108565,0.0005269522,0.00026010213,0.00036715597,2.4589777e-8,0.0030594375,0.000055893557,0.98332703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642146,0.00010604586,0.00044504312,0.00094558974,0.0013423744,0.00073950185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971945,0.00014463966,0.0009936339,0.0006795563,0.00030551196,0.00068211294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015191165,0.0006113248,0.0010141406,0.00083135796,0.00063281215,0.0001518278,0.0031624637,0.00046367763,0.012023593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002478389,0.00074686384,0.0008132009,0.00043454216,0.001846681,0.0070453947,0.0011783965,0.0007630596,0.0011150109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044040053,0.000506726,0.26535636,0.00011208904,0.000627513,0.00090295234,0.0003719262,0.00007011653,2.6583674e-8,0.0043982794,0.71317226,0.014041342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094633776,0.00011921622,0.09464463,0.00018276052,0.00017638976,0.000005764285,0.00006351484,0.000024183628,8.07951e-7,0.00015389604,0.90294784,0.00073464116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008543351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015571873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18977559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036968503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002156112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018824347","doi":"","title":"Domesticating Guidance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Statute; Formality; Promulgation; Interpretation (philosophy); Notice; Scholarship; Scrutiny","score_opus":0.0192168237388043,"score_gpt":0.2866433128202807,"score_spread":0.2674264890814764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018824347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1355205,0.0006145911,0.000048403203,0.0034409428,0.0005991309,0.00030021707,0.0000036196634,0.000187106,0.8592855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92942685,0.000036167206,0.0010902627,0.0013789227,0.0005024397,0.0000116654455,0.0000019499957,0.000011598803,0.06754015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871606,0.00010991188,0.00018289966,0.0002581727,0.0003418817,0.00039105956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992551,0.00008673218,0.00006333121,0.0003042725,0.00007834864,0.00021219408],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057433924,0.00009881317,0.00015236797,0.000021566935,0.00042565644,0.0001682434,0.000393667,0.00007480844,0.0036583699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020240214,0.00007310823,0.00005860024,0.00020658133,0.00016386305,0.00038390406,0.00005445177,0.00019347601,0.0053650453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008232387,0.000027545355,0.005348209,0.000011351138,0.000008824344,0.0000061605115,0.0006127832,0.0000071114987,0.0009686251,0.9881272,0.002752929,0.0021210357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022717284,0.000028376457,0.0018034643,0.000036644207,0.0000047269996,9.661213e-7,0.00014148872,0.000035125373,0.000283714,0.004738066,0.9925406,0.00015964892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010976649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028402319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007579513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013033715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019615438","doi":"","title":"The Hallett Decrees And Acequia Water Rights\\nAdministration On Rio Culebra In Colorado","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Feature (linguistics); Period (music); Nova scotia","score_opus":0.033845606743309935,"score_gpt":0.28960878259900663,"score_spread":0.2557631758556967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019615438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75293493,0.00038654808,0.0000049379864,0.025375845,0.0004305918,0.00042548365,0.0000031806157,0.00007146479,0.22036701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98448086,0.000058905767,0.00007958152,0.00072042056,0.00031499067,0.00002570609,0.0000056740996,0.00000771191,0.014306154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853146,0.00024912512,0.00020433818,0.00023821082,0.00038980262,0.00038708292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933803,0.000076234806,0.000039064467,0.00019530482,0.00006899328,0.00028236312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010585025,0.00012319807,0.00014022789,0.000028892087,0.00084380695,0.00043638056,0.00026614527,0.000108096,0.00013929985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098547265,0.000058915983,0.00003142284,0.000100301484,0.00038711427,0.00038056113,0.000048107948,0.00023117909,0.00030398127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001642371,0.00008187781,0.0010606503,0.0000038309686,0.000013659404,0.000038396258,0.0038272818,0.000006047896,0.00018624224,0.9835933,0.010040685,0.0009838127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004969058,0.0001569649,0.0007645901,0.00001646528,0.0000049412465,0.0000016079792,0.0004174809,0.000027642533,0.0008377528,0.021315835,0.97582227,0.00013754738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021403367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22029571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96578157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114110015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013264793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019770552","doi":"","title":"1968 House Bill 3157. An Act Providing For The Acquisition Of Land Situated In Salisbury By The Town Of Salisbury From The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legislature; Situated; Legislation; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.012917254799336397,"score_gpt":0.24768635685149423,"score_spread":0.23476910205215784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019770552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3064195,0.10078119,0.00070522266,0.122005224,0.0039802114,0.032743804,0.033487238,0.0031292208,0.3967484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6753048,0.020610008,0.00029257557,0.00096401875,0.0010899387,0.00027433975,0.0011876948,0.0011953647,0.2990813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931555,0.0021513677,0.0017322878,0.0008021945,0.001012027,0.0011466728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99365085,0.0019762232,0.0026108366,0.0015059737,0.00007264389,0.00018348508],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011892184,0.00068818737,0.0013203842,0.00030284777,0.00041688516,0.00019963658,0.0028221926,0.00043364667,0.0007053871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046680554,0.0003130362,0.0004406393,0.0007203652,0.0015138368,0.0020594473,0.00029606544,0.00079022645,0.0000025717538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033506406,0.0007758276,0.019508153,0.0005941379,0.0014958858,0.000020789754,0.0104733305,0.000059397247,0.010077683,0.0043890295,0.9423723,0.0068828026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023060571,0.0010010757,0.0017477667,0.00096416555,0.00027761358,0.0000038223657,0.0005887636,0.00012229556,0.038723823,0.009713407,0.94380945,0.00074173755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02027291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012112422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36888525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009430341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017586851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023923562","doi":"","title":"Positive Covenants and the Inherent Instability of Alteration Agreements Within Condominium: <em>The Owners, Strata Plan NW 2476 v. Jensen</em>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Liability; Supreme court; Property (philosophy); Common law; Dispute resolution; Abandonment (legal)","score_opus":0.022940552865706253,"score_gpt":0.28277967129413606,"score_spread":0.2598391184284298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023923562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96129847,0.00058790616,0.00007105968,0.0060233115,0.00048215603,0.0014634244,0.00010209342,0.000032093772,0.029939467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554914,0.00006010223,0.00004364342,0.001132586,0.000097645105,0.000033084387,0.00001646763,0.0000050797835,0.0030622215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979518,0.000741268,0.00039777166,0.00027698162,0.0003842937,0.00024790654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893934,0.00032329012,0.00018237403,0.000319546,0.0001406926,0.00009475807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015661379,0.00014668236,0.00026864698,0.000027769043,0.00081258983,0.00025804143,0.00034797803,0.000084795785,0.00015445704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027518443,0.00006858054,0.00006562853,0.00021736737,0.000876032,0.00030963798,0.000107020736,0.00026897722,0.000013276696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012158665,0.00020844166,0.0051958165,0.000053505257,0.00021293527,0.0000069822795,0.02211614,0.000018623183,0.00085002347,0.9634965,0.0026872077,0.0039379746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05317014,0.0015648418,0.15145002,0.0020395194,0.0011123308,0.000018261373,0.08106055,0.002513638,0.052219532,0.19135024,0.46090987,0.0025910586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018824005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06259096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7721462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007816443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026058868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025323328","doi":"","title":"Volumetric Subdivision and the Architectures of Property","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Property (philosophy); Real property; Property law; Statutory law; Space (punctuation); Subdivision; Property rights; Architecture","score_opus":0.010825889123523462,"score_gpt":0.28238228651742064,"score_spread":0.2715563973938972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025323328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10614692,0.0014332044,0.00051262026,0.022607306,0.00012371644,0.00042012605,7.209411e-7,0.000039928964,0.86871547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176914,0.00011088467,0.00007199155,0.00032960586,0.000021795424,0.000002954656,9.2499185e-8,9.487488e-7,0.08177034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995054,0.00011838342,0.00008512798,0.00007517777,0.0001278867,0.000088030865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970835,0.00013462041,0.000018514544,0.000079083395,0.000039833216,0.00001957125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005393137,0.000033916564,0.000086007196,0.00006488895,0.0002395213,0.000033615583,0.00013561067,0.000022629396,0.00011151827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002566602,0.000010228387,0.00002614829,0.00038755493,0.0004929257,0.000024100498,0.000045897577,0.000054223125,0.000002148894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076734155,0.000025086027,0.002451689,0.000013498252,0.000015342515,2.9917894e-7,0.002408794,0.0000011922272,0.00005171024,0.79629874,0.003799422,0.19485746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009038111,0.000033422522,0.014860528,0.000023928396,0.000018291266,2.5115418e-7,0.0004377599,0.00065303344,0.0006551676,0.02145312,0.9608909,0.00006977395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016673455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019298963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9570915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006434782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055258424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7041962174","doi":"","title":"Offshore Wind Development in the Great Lakes: Accessing Untapped Energy Potential Through International and Interstate Agreement to Overcome Public Trust Concerns","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public trust doctrine; Scrutiny; Doctrine; Public trust; Ambiguity; Public interest; Renewable energy; Wind power","score_opus":0.043715339772431264,"score_gpt":0.30117676391092296,"score_spread":0.2574614241384917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7041962174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8575485,0.00077132334,0.0012389857,0.03748114,0.0011515061,0.0003728037,0.000021666983,0.000059069345,0.10135506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98923653,0.0001774721,0.0005007292,0.0038964078,0.00038085686,0.00001989499,0.000036987938,0.000009437313,0.0057416954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821657,0.00024294652,0.00030729864,0.00032110707,0.0005255878,0.00038646365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994341,0.000043792395,0.00006691078,0.00017543307,0.00012183895,0.00015790707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041837877,0.00015392632,0.00017954063,0.000051847433,0.00053585495,0.0009612114,0.0005129889,0.00006798375,0.0014417422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007365508,0.00010385942,0.0000475597,0.0003084127,0.00018095422,0.00080201775,0.00022539102,0.00018319943,0.000031113872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022275865,0.0005154895,0.017357973,0.000040873783,0.00034088094,0.0005494342,0.10073559,0.00007745411,0.0018559168,0.76017064,0.005901867,0.11223113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000593496,0.000028248201,0.0037558072,0.000063701744,0.000008361916,0.0000071122613,0.00606104,0.000036913585,0.00047321443,0.0014023605,0.987368,0.00020175798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009952366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07728233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026877617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032184983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043014668","doi":"","title":"Review of <i>Aboriginal Title and Indigenous Peoples: Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.</i> Edited by Louis A. Knafla and Haijo Westra.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Indigenous; Discipline; Jurisdiction; Frame (networking)","score_opus":0.024578008223141937,"score_gpt":0.2416431876121418,"score_spread":0.21706517938899986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043014668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93042856,0.02001223,0.000025922065,0.0046061366,0.0002697062,0.0005693319,0.00022036888,0.000032588323,0.043835167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6903028,0.080569975,0.0014503509,0.0006776124,0.00026349162,3.7696446e-7,0.000035065794,0.000014920939,0.22668545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995893,0.000025626518,0.000059998063,0.00010375939,0.000116070194,0.00010522872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969333,0.000020713416,0.00006146291,0.000055804325,0.00003826975,0.00013043889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008771114,0.000052767526,0.00014272919,0.000024818592,0.000108920074,0.0000064036926,0.00008826396,0.000044337925,0.00062104757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007943434,0.000049024933,0.000013474964,0.00010034945,0.00016758566,0.00008530168,0.000020452182,0.00005628487,0.000003980829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049375056,0.00008574213,0.020577539,0.0010495535,0.000072561044,0.000039861014,0.022196691,3.3903206e-8,0.00013145144,0.004912879,0.9364448,0.01443947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020417002,0.00004972101,0.010207623,0.00023328527,0.000034932385,0.0000022484217,0.0006213335,7.5885487e-7,0.000016425869,0.000067192246,0.98848325,0.00007905328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81862265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55686206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2617606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019095096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036921987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6800035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043528855","doi":"","title":"“There’s a Moment When All Old Things Become New Again”: The Canadian Oil and Gas Royalty – A Modern Rent Charge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Flexibility (engineering); Investment (military); Real property; Value (mathematics); Production (economics); Petroleum industry; Energy law; Peak oil","score_opus":0.03273996349982775,"score_gpt":0.26623578629049405,"score_spread":0.2334958227906663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043528855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19262756,0.0026602775,0.000012085921,0.44441757,0.001100379,0.00067533395,0.00006740942,0.00056823774,0.35787115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48341477,0.001129392,0.00009410793,0.01394566,0.00089631404,0.00006895124,0.000024559242,0.00004157967,0.5003847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977753,0.00017397842,0.00023939981,0.0004029188,0.0005599107,0.0008484874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846107,0.000056021992,0.00007298104,0.00036960444,0.000058556747,0.0009817668],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011164296,0.00020078242,0.00022754652,0.000075167336,0.0014219759,0.0005651342,0.0005567757,0.00013359661,0.0013289008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007413425,0.00012448245,0.00008737856,0.0002439343,0.00020769643,0.00037532535,0.000114085226,0.00038683545,0.0007521799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039276674,0.0000654362,0.0010884538,0.000044076583,0.00016736965,0.00013324349,0.079190545,0.000021518876,0.00015647884,0.66271347,0.20822182,0.048158303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032674707,0.000031427735,0.00039434974,0.000039968432,0.000017947517,0.0000013856314,0.00023811152,0.00044251385,0.000018477236,0.023180015,0.9750921,0.00021692346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9284064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95496935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7668703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036101873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006116945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7044086136","doi":"","title":"\"There's a Moment When All Old Things Become New Again\": The Canadian Oil and Gas Royalty - A Modern Rent Charge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Flexibility (engineering); Investment (military); Real property; Value (mathematics); Production (economics); Petroleum industry; Energy law; Peak oil","score_opus":0.12319879440037455,"score_gpt":0.3336927304570016,"score_spread":0.21049393605662703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7044086136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6171221,0.0018653362,0.000035681354,0.34452125,0.00017719231,0.00072859356,0.00007264671,0.00024278075,0.035234395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7983788,0.0053095883,0.00029066773,0.00095166493,0.00021680516,0.0000052544,0.000034435623,0.000045369074,0.19476739],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380875,0.0012651358,0.0002939972,0.00075773115,0.0021541384,0.0017202348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658275,0.00045921037,0.00014177259,0.000685491,0.0004838841,0.0016468816],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075089657,0.00027742892,0.0004069179,0.0007695222,0.0038922133,0.00048892817,0.0018794483,0.00033520994,0.0013552998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005142882,0.00023066356,0.00020035569,0.0013065528,0.0011106973,0.0018983225,0.0006196055,0.0019153932,0.00054261036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070524117,0.00034723015,0.00933452,0.00032488667,0.0009591571,0.0016538166,0.38757965,0.00008920604,0.0018282556,0.25014934,0.14420769,0.20282102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013375505,0.00023931525,0.0070870183,0.00027067543,0.0000675175,0.000008318892,0.008725254,0.0011966815,0.000054098662,0.05300588,0.9274791,0.0005285871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76824874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72228783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78327143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009762761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020613065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067925579","doi":"","title":"Nation Rise Wind Farm Assessing Legal Action Following the Government of Ontario’s Unprecedented Decision to Revoke its Renewable Energy Approval","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Renewable energy; Energy policy; Public policy","score_opus":0.037853330275684605,"score_gpt":0.30550333598621066,"score_spread":0.26765000571052605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067925579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011701796,0.00015980628,0.0036641648,0.0005234044,0.0015794609,0.0005330209,0.0000055541736,0.000062422776,0.992302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062293418,0.00007619616,0.00068515213,0.00013978229,0.00033802347,0.0000100768575,0.00000739925,0.00007682796,0.9363731],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721634,0.00016025879,0.00031040455,0.00038350062,0.0016404472,0.00028905322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918103,0.00008136853,0.0002841315,0.0002957686,0.0000671356,0.00009055887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007379309,0.00021472009,0.00032174072,0.00010083704,0.00030514773,0.0002502058,0.00040958473,0.00026909963,0.0012418063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110587076,0.00012637458,0.0001709736,0.00029059622,0.000034957055,0.00028049393,0.0000943442,0.00016965627,0.000024376935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043286994,0.0006646252,0.00057234685,0.00013262729,0.00071764487,0.00002036751,0.0089509105,0.0017541848,0.007411686,0.04109794,0.62309253,0.31515226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028377617,0.000039838735,0.000054452874,0.00029873705,0.000049985803,4.180352e-7,0.00058517244,0.00008815988,0.0010495717,0.00005366652,0.99729615,0.00020007587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7467822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8771135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3742036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013555263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069507275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070779861","doi":"","title":"A Property Law Reader: Cases, Questions, and Commentary, 5th ed.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property law; Indigenous; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Meaning (existential); Real property; Value (mathematics); Intellectual property","score_opus":0.025503292092713715,"score_gpt":0.2878017450693656,"score_spread":0.2622984529766519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070779861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08113509,0.012328062,0.00002545289,0.24159306,0.0017583122,0.0028778214,0.00036393045,0.001010785,0.6589075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594871,0.00033987057,0.00043122921,0.020017717,0.0005560474,0.00015282453,0.000043130392,0.000022726368,0.018949375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802226,0.0005152726,0.00021999239,0.000343009,0.00048747077,0.00041198972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992254,0.0000763817,0.00006383594,0.0002729353,0.00005180342,0.00030967142],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076462195,0.00014324534,0.00020104808,0.000032211854,0.0030505713,0.00023284847,0.0003342623,0.000053186577,0.0027331302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058399677,0.00009804166,0.000054348933,0.00019113738,0.00046208687,0.0004283576,0.00023647932,0.00043332117,0.000080535334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006608272,0.00027556755,0.0013918548,0.00001884588,0.00003976583,0.000110697845,0.0015543078,0.000004386128,0.0000934325,0.8748395,0.11794325,0.0036623199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003686402,0.00019218937,0.00015064684,0.000018921635,0.0000228159,0.00002324991,0.00069446943,0.000014133673,0.000038721064,0.002295585,0.9959678,0.00021282301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34954327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071596295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.878352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022058024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012908716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7084235369","doi":"","title":"Radical Agreement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Agreement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.024947133987708314,"score_gpt":0.29380765232156764,"score_spread":0.2688605183338593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7084235369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018131599,0.0045950296,0.00016582866,0.023236249,0.0018163736,0.00031565828,0.000010224381,0.00045043067,0.9512786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89784646,0.00021366544,0.00028580395,0.0015713925,0.0016252373,0.00001927302,0.0000048963357,0.000012524704,0.098420754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986415,0.00010943585,0.0001630192,0.00026541553,0.00045503664,0.0003655748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943125,0.00005259917,0.000014486924,0.0001725294,0.000029470235,0.00029968444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056125224,0.00009945933,0.00011954847,0.000035469566,0.00044907408,0.00040178504,0.00027492363,0.00008368372,0.008557248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057760284,0.00006730164,0.000091554524,0.00023666733,0.0002896348,0.00033189793,0.000047391975,0.00025714707,0.004490174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055134433,0.00002926696,0.000059897116,0.000013189552,0.00002079124,0.00007150759,0.0007176949,9.905131e-7,0.00015038416,0.95058054,0.040726196,0.0076240525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001074161,0.000031603122,0.00009498426,0.000042854706,0.000011205276,0.0000017294052,0.0000907857,0.000044907614,0.00019433949,0.0076814867,0.9915718,0.0001268879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012044776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007260864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012770112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020263893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99628496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095292997","doi":"","title":"2 N,N 0)[2-tert-butylanilinato(2","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intramolecular force; Ligand (biochemistry); Atom (system on chip); Coordination sphere; Hydrogen bond; Hydrogen atom; Oxide; Molecule","score_opus":0.012257883323805691,"score_gpt":0.31288939296016044,"score_spread":0.30063150963635477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095292997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11535474,0.000009945158,0.000039251885,0.008076567,0.00051795307,0.00006708842,5.0288503e-7,0.00012838838,0.87580556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9035203,0.000009276712,0.0004478069,0.00048086263,0.000367067,0.0000024776575,5.9676876e-7,0.000003143443,0.09516851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994842,0.000021778182,0.000063216,0.000096148935,0.00015299935,0.00018169053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999715,0.000023358505,0.000011782016,0.00010662824,0.00004127343,0.000101982216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025970672,0.000040535855,0.00005105838,0.000020664367,0.000280844,0.00006594729,0.00017754415,0.000057637753,0.00812983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006565186,0.000024328721,0.00002835738,0.0000879525,0.00012848608,0.0001362731,0.000017534261,0.00014289841,0.00059872237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023733946,0.000025193907,0.0010575699,7.995322e-7,0.0000024719584,0.0000040803734,0.0009856974,2.4346814e-8,0.0027093492,0.97110975,0.008955912,0.015146804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006570868,0.000007804943,0.0008924787,6.1712325e-7,0.0000013202705,6.3977905e-7,0.00009478388,0.000010957824,0.0010280033,0.0041468744,0.99369144,0.00005938109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044584665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016355904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007147693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062981635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095854342","doi":"","title":"Address for manuscript correspondence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Incentive; Information asymmetry; Moral hazard; Private information retrieval; Welfare; Private sector; Public good; Information economics","score_opus":0.054077062799252854,"score_gpt":0.32658754492123665,"score_spread":0.2725104821219838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095854342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004796543,0.000042339143,0.013795262,0.0069183987,0.00068084744,0.00031195136,0.0000026207215,0.00013417973,0.97331786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6841109,0.00000815923,0.00072002574,0.0010715489,0.00036215497,0.000019142537,0.0000010952481,0.0000037254865,0.3137033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994203,0.000055015957,0.00006949042,0.0001136681,0.000142051,0.00019946371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996481,0.0001045928,0.000017566392,0.000092289454,0.00005990388,0.000077540375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050427654,0.000041897423,0.000065362154,0.000020943524,0.0003224512,0.000068772635,0.00019736862,0.00003557224,0.0010998205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020722026,0.000026171148,0.000033420296,0.00006586109,0.0000927851,0.00013578942,0.000013870252,0.000033102606,0.00014716935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022028487,0.000014576694,0.000084925945,0.000003334657,0.000002200084,2.932451e-7,0.0008264001,7.0381515e-7,0.0002353882,0.9371462,0.043293457,0.018370502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001360438,0.000036993682,0.0002859671,0.0000035975881,0.0000024998776,1.4045553e-7,0.00012853698,0.00028452804,0.00034649696,0.005727896,0.9929832,0.00006407835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019024224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023175254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94968975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015812424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036869344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095895061","doi":"","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Incentive; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Natural resource; Property law; Tangible property","score_opus":0.18901999199442168,"score_gpt":0.38782608634084614,"score_spread":0.19880609434642446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095895061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006062719,0.00005217798,0.000071549635,0.0024573805,0.00025257887,0.000039895564,1.2002776e-7,0.000059065107,0.9910045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71378064,0.000008565541,0.00021984165,0.0002854327,0.000219831,0.0000014243158,2.9738058e-7,0.0000014343258,0.28548253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966073,0.000026774771,0.000033641507,0.00004695339,0.00013197013,0.00009992446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997635,0.0000048924003,0.0000056547333,0.000043900847,0.000056878438,0.00012516945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022604932,0.000019961288,0.000028487342,0.000010566199,0.000085033374,0.00003127522,0.00008635142,0.000016928387,0.001121003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006242674,0.000011674057,0.000010034511,0.00006811578,0.000046366564,0.000110345005,0.000013266055,0.00002128479,0.0015983321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058338746,0.000046559944,0.0014549954,6.156729e-7,0.0000048219613,0.0000032955334,0.006894939,4.0458698e-7,0.000017671797,0.7062198,0.26738003,0.017971003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009118307,0.000009317558,0.000073724084,7.453716e-7,7.428891e-7,6.266448e-8,0.00042712083,0.0000071740405,0.00006251153,0.0033197496,0.99597955,0.000028102933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022380047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018134768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72859955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028773422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009276777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095908665","doi":"","title":"The Chief Corporate Officer recommends that:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Expropriation; Chief executive officer; Property (philosophy); Dual (grammatical number)","score_opus":0.13325474820204602,"score_gpt":0.2939910511392634,"score_spread":0.16073630293721736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095908665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02439678,0.00015123456,0.000033451768,0.03101191,0.00036862816,0.000103157305,9.29891e-7,0.000098868855,0.943835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71774477,0.0007418764,0.0000633422,0.0008673051,0.00020242152,0.0000043021787,8.5643626e-7,0.0000037283555,0.2803714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992893,0.00009073385,0.00008405237,0.00009995367,0.00020439632,0.00023156349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996239,0.00007406464,0.000053120813,0.00013123131,0.00003978155,0.00007791913],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039204286,0.000054784523,0.000063053405,0.000013239682,0.0018704206,0.00006758989,0.00024081937,0.000035800043,0.001215493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003121124,0.000023990106,0.000039024628,0.0001479621,0.00032006297,0.00013522718,0.000026050378,0.00009104423,0.00029858507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031406453,0.0000666409,0.004547093,0.0000010380257,0.000023507888,0.000020765956,0.0048898067,9.4368767e-7,0.000033298496,0.6188713,0.33526197,0.036252253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008768643,0.000015677919,0.0032524609,0.0000011540678,0.0000015945723,0.0000019143122,0.0002410944,0.000015592019,0.00009850615,0.0014474323,0.9947744,0.00006246132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004011145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005338306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.693348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022842689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000979275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096348925","doi":"","title":"Great Lobbying Allocation And Dissipation Of Rents In A Dynamic Commonagency Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Markov perfect equilibrium; Economic rent; Pareto principle; Sequential game; Welfare; Markov chain; Pareto efficiency; Markov process; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.03354525851645872,"score_gpt":0.3396483175248989,"score_spread":0.30610305900844015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096348925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91385335,0.00006806351,0.008244683,0.0005715636,0.000023776938,0.00013034629,5.512872e-7,0.000015127003,0.07709256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695426,0.00007115664,0.0005422547,0.000023977853,0.0000066984917,0.000001284462,0.0000030703384,0.0000018635661,0.002395422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956155,0.000021608485,0.00012634814,0.00007330041,0.00011854865,0.000098672426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998478,0.00001769791,0.000030139365,0.000046407276,0.000026318277,0.000031593514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004271451,0.000031778185,0.000055394186,0.00005446677,0.00007270807,0.000010736846,0.000050393246,0.000031546213,0.000027264827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024009492,0.000022490065,0.000009026452,0.00012681,0.000052812975,0.00017433535,0.000012037825,0.000032074782,0.0000011959663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102862694,0.00024779642,0.09009604,0.000055916204,0.000011815723,0.0000044543413,0.03229255,0.0005733397,0.0063971807,0.53506494,0.000091896494,0.33506122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013057898,0.00010561062,0.3848159,0.00014767623,0.000021778127,9.2020275e-7,0.0032303566,0.54918116,0.0011565773,0.05639907,0.0032018146,0.00043333258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008020754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042799234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5486078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004308328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019826743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096633240","doi":"","title":"Title of Project: The Impact of Open Market Share Repurchases on","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Open market operation; Reproduction; Order (exchange); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.09558869775891171,"score_gpt":0.409933510397085,"score_spread":0.31434481263817327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096633240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046933247,0.000013608961,0.0000019126758,0.0012963945,0.000017257364,0.00013665503,0.000018562525,0.000005188366,0.9938171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8009312,0.000020359887,0.000011441391,0.000020606112,0.000025720688,0.000001999015,2.1005634e-7,0.000001394588,0.19898705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974495,0.000034322755,0.000049198872,0.000042129606,0.00007636395,0.00005303351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979174,0.000050410003,0.000025699115,0.00009307892,0.000027743461,0.000011341655],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019849592,0.000020874979,0.000047122176,0.000010884384,0.000036005196,0.000011890788,0.00022273452,0.0000121866315,0.027373075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079881,0.000006059409,0.000028485309,0.000057560505,0.000068515415,0.000054253956,0.000034346558,0.00001219594,0.000039403545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044683027,0.00005471258,0.0004215203,0.0000026329114,0.000016495998,5.126481e-7,0.00063864846,3.9447496e-8,0.00035651485,0.08794343,0.8804356,0.030085238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012886543,0.00014038329,0.003125153,0.00003417342,0.0000023802447,1.5347857e-7,0.0001175843,0.000004789243,0.0016224592,0.0013239216,0.9934604,0.000039717623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011425338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033651237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011943633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010144996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99515766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096674037","doi":"","title":"Public Lands Operational Handbook","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Government (linguistics); Majesty; Liability; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.08835987594396,"score_gpt":0.30015833560599686,"score_spread":0.21179845966203686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096674037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050015566,0.00012263765,0.0015481645,0.043673057,0.00012360021,0.0000788731,9.85684e-7,0.00009083396,0.9493603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250979,0.00004167992,0.0006728993,0.0013833431,0.0003051218,0.000004641009,0.0000039693227,0.0000021846647,0.0724883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953514,0.000017799875,0.000055960885,0.000075267446,0.00017553286,0.0001402987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980354,0.000007562987,0.0000072016137,0.000047258218,0.000053509426,0.000080945654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015755653,0.000031872612,0.000039342536,0.000021464619,0.00039374683,0.00015056286,0.000102728045,0.000028434271,0.003381497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003344941,0.000018736993,0.000019752364,0.0000857279,0.00007861973,0.00027256255,0.000011514792,0.000038790957,0.0003449457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011558367,0.0000240201,0.00034562734,3.2296703e-7,0.000002945346,0.0000017056775,0.00075106946,0.0000033958916,0.00005739021,0.99496895,0.00245435,0.001389077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023375843,0.000014007883,0.000347375,0.0000024005853,8.762163e-7,5.591886e-7,0.0000661009,0.00000534522,0.0002502656,0.008881245,0.9901459,0.00005212537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035852734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006738719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044662233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026643637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99752957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096737833","doi":"","title":"Reference","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Tax exemption; Capital (architecture); Property tax; Real property; Space (punctuation); Square (algebra)","score_opus":0.039907920663465775,"score_gpt":0.334631936368542,"score_spread":0.2947240157050762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096737833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055149782,0.0000031282195,0.000017915156,0.0035860627,0.00017352667,0.00002649712,1.8743495e-7,0.00006040064,0.9409825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8820506,0.000007084012,0.00041567266,0.00024827983,0.00014541333,0.0000010286252,2.3130632e-7,9.483087e-7,0.11713074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997294,0.000010708608,0.00002994502,0.00005090092,0.000085404135,0.00009362964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998434,0.000011414904,0.0000056431463,0.00006171835,0.00002462112,0.00005316507],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014688403,0.00001813302,0.000023336324,0.000008605051,0.00017232985,0.00003519163,0.00010726079,0.00002948199,0.008086908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040511997,0.0000102131535,0.000008104547,0.000049255665,0.0000820129,0.000085962405,0.0000085855,0.00008968966,0.00049279083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.598187e-7,0.0000055245937,0.00020341277,1.4496274e-7,4.244867e-7,5.0552325e-7,0.0003131824,5.1036633e-9,0.0014034507,0.9846686,0.0029452948,0.01045888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022552775,0.0000034027819,0.0008631647,2.572385e-7,4.035787e-7,1.2705675e-7,0.000052364656,0.0000023737748,0.00031242843,0.0036326225,0.9950831,0.00002718009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006788651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023781419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99213785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000027823069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043837685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097161701","doi":"","title":"STANISLAUS COUNTY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Patience; Valuation (finance); State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.11064883865182555,"score_gpt":0.29415720223602343,"score_spread":0.18350836358419786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097161701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005798228,0.000028695848,0.00021285024,0.00038551955,0.00012498537,0.000049760973,9.880041e-7,0.00008059992,0.9933184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167275,0.00003632161,0.00075930444,0.00036330902,0.000092609225,0.0000016549354,2.3644432e-7,0.0000022348254,0.08201684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996027,0.000024415165,0.00004798462,0.00006530386,0.0001251758,0.00013442698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998297,0.00000657049,0.000009764771,0.00006397458,0.000032850083,0.000057102796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001918221,0.000027936758,0.000037630583,0.000010244341,0.00018566662,0.000020723375,0.00010970861,0.000024207357,0.010181278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014267223,0.000016276153,0.000015996808,0.000064672175,0.00009309057,0.00012488442,0.000009835794,0.00003200171,0.00028881902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041042467,0.00002084407,0.0003531659,4.4718266e-7,0.0000026137589,0.0000035890125,0.0050129946,5.1199454e-9,0.00001994738,0.9845636,0.005542209,0.0044764616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046560435,0.000014839232,0.00095005916,8.568e-7,0.0000016287144,1.5237315e-7,0.0005231178,0.0000014718382,0.0002549381,0.0073929266,0.99076813,0.00004530776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022099286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061223204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017786928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053688913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99072355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097602484","doi":"","title":"Ownership","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Block (permutation group theory); Quarter (Canadian coin); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.18716949750731945,"score_gpt":0.3554271968070139,"score_spread":0.16825769929969445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097602484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045673572,0.000035971203,0.00006549675,0.010193856,0.00013511741,0.000031421845,8.650966e-8,0.00007153534,0.98489916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7866867,0.0000036760512,0.00018534745,0.00047391985,0.00019993633,8.591248e-7,2.0322169e-7,0.000001141962,0.21244822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996468,0.000034744688,0.0000309279,0.000045171317,0.00013849647,0.000103905804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999776,0.000008318622,0.000005675339,0.00004391666,0.000036616188,0.00012949163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031896392,0.000018834355,0.000027510958,0.000010330849,0.000077695884,0.00003417847,0.000082854116,0.000018573963,0.0007236004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007662043,0.000009823986,0.000010852362,0.000071926166,0.00005777604,0.000101920814,0.000007929446,0.000024948979,0.00058230705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031830104,0.000010438245,0.00049793255,2.4147315e-7,0.0000014125236,0.0000022483914,0.003945232,3.14525e-7,0.0000063247408,0.9261126,0.06250148,0.0069185765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006437457,0.000009246526,0.000070636816,4.846684e-7,6.657672e-7,1.14159114e-7,0.00088068045,0.0000062172007,0.000045449302,0.0060845315,0.9928086,0.000029032548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006540003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025005229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9303071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002251617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009675374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98865724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097765890","doi":"","title":"Udvers i ty of Alberta Losing the Game: Wildlife Conservation and the Regulation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife conservation; Wildlife; North American Model of Wildlife Conservation; Wildlife management; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04514841181480491,"score_gpt":0.28321849448808356,"score_spread":0.23807008267327864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097765890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32625473,0.00017310913,0.00031976937,0.21842597,0.00017952442,0.00043089397,4.837854e-7,0.000022418977,0.4541931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848236,0.000026203505,0.000041802887,0.0013814145,0.00006766157,0.0000016996036,7.427146e-7,0.0000015755777,0.013655305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999448,0.00015598867,0.00009331068,0.00005516184,0.00018007298,0.00006744876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955124,0.00020140629,0.000053564934,0.00008139671,0.00008229891,0.000030088144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008824732,0.00003073643,0.000057628313,0.000008658649,0.00017658445,0.00004401264,0.00008197422,0.000023941864,0.00005432941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029556465,0.000011600329,0.000015565472,0.000105054634,0.0005199443,0.00016063523,0.000016247699,0.000034317123,0.000004081069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006541744,0.000008004257,0.0025595913,0.0000020162463,0.000009409799,4.9374215e-8,0.02446852,0.00001484304,0.000027541846,0.9553563,0.015197949,0.002290377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010824442,0.000023743676,0.009236645,0.000013745048,0.000024387402,7.487608e-7,0.0053094565,0.006541876,0.0001405308,0.022976846,0.95457447,0.00007510281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078281924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01638754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93937653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015593865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075522556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92785585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100462915","doi":"","title":"Province of Ontario C","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.07323596821571475,"score_gpt":0.29878388753680085,"score_spread":0.2255479193210861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100462915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061832678,0.00001796201,0.00003990796,0.0010069701,0.0000721228,0.00005624935,1.4591065e-7,0.00001875052,0.9369552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63687867,7.7761894e-7,0.0003994376,0.000060764574,0.000035337856,5.0579786e-7,1.4765244e-7,7.580089e-7,0.3626236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996692,0.000016314918,0.00005181965,0.000043509594,0.00014471228,0.00007443762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998104,0.0000048784773,0.000014598388,0.00004883227,0.000053509295,0.00006779138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021772475,0.000018921128,0.00004278325,0.00000894639,0.00003598344,0.000010266057,0.00008538802,0.000016539232,0.00058511295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026592228,0.000010846157,0.000012088132,0.00003901426,0.000069594076,0.00009552202,0.000011543827,0.00002592786,0.000046811347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017593253,0.00006670581,0.008202712,0.00000213324,0.0000055821906,0.0000045219617,0.025384177,0.0000016528525,0.00004059382,0.9325644,0.026391407,0.0073185586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007566178,0.000026769418,0.0004694992,0.0000013950905,0.0000010853825,8.220526e-8,0.00019308069,0.0000017054582,0.00025846498,0.0018356092,0.9971119,0.000024749921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68632805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88147634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97072047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110332316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015396496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64065766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100699795","doi":"","title":"Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Correlation of Private and Public Interests in Land Law: Continuation of the Optimal Combination Search","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuation; Public domain; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Public opinion","score_opus":0.019913321477079315,"score_gpt":0.27986697622991746,"score_spread":0.25995365475283816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100699795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907677,0.000040853378,0.000008629471,0.00173844,0.000030715833,0.00031933896,0.0000049236787,0.0000025605489,0.007086831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937075,0.000021057042,0.00004111146,0.00003778638,0.000008710502,0.0000024664553,0.0000048590728,0.0000017489848,0.0005115317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939525,0.00009549207,0.0001631459,0.000075644966,0.00016780765,0.000102653845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997401,0.000024552686,0.00007019206,0.000029576395,0.000075698874,0.000059876165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024921467,0.00004055076,0.00008826073,0.000060123926,0.000086663946,0.000030706822,0.00008250353,0.000072693714,0.00011363486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036037545,0.000022985105,0.000011878773,0.0001491697,0.00031408764,0.00042449447,0.000029545743,0.00008747627,7.334425e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009956827,0.000037647293,0.60774344,0.000013185492,0.000007587839,1.0190435e-7,0.007712294,0.0000029070334,0.0016393655,0.38174906,0.00017904406,0.0009054185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088329613,0.000077927936,0.9845545,0.00005526816,0.000006542272,0.000001231508,0.0021480606,0.0022741354,0.0052942317,0.0017572739,0.0028684926,0.00007902325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.369936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3473654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3799918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004140984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051120016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66454345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117148552","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5790363","title":"&lt;p&gt;Eminent Domain: A Critical Analysis of the Balance Between Public Purpose and Property Rights Under Indian and Canadian Law&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Expropriation; Public domain; Doctrine; Government (linguistics); Property rights; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.016765054147002474,"score_gpt":0.2730595272499414,"score_spread":0.25629447310293896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117148552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6833389,0.030644454,0.0008123455,0.16347356,0.0013046486,0.0024901954,0.0006164515,0.00010675381,0.117212705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916329,0.00258707,0.000051070278,0.00033614234,0.00041066034,0.000018283412,0.000017158958,0.000014016125,0.0049326965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948761,0.0006983417,0.00059994287,0.0005758536,0.00074783736,0.0025019324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813,0.00016719772,0.0002668899,0.00043616904,0.00034095574,0.00065879145],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003076088,0.00036027413,0.0007982491,0.00059071503,0.0018067885,0.00055343163,0.0010189121,0.0004714901,0.00008383718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018550591,0.00018778622,0.0003147971,0.00097003917,0.00114066,0.00025876088,0.00029225476,0.0028183109,0.0000015554429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014202042,0.000045942663,0.0054710214,0.000038217866,0.0015589485,0.000009485184,0.0019785992,0.000007472049,0.000020618534,0.9880411,0.00015149402,0.0026629034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006646669,0.00013658023,0.014464926,0.00028743342,0.001891051,0.000045420482,0.0007602439,0.00012161344,0.000018421468,0.59413886,0.38673538,0.0007354232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20452376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9516893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74716556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018914517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0119460365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119522914","doi":"10.58837/chula.is.2024.391","title":"Section 94 of the Land Code B.E. 2497: Legal Issues Concerning Illegal Acquisition, Disposal, and Retention of Land by Foreigners","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislative history; Dispose pattern; Enforcement; Legislature; Statutory law; Section (typography); Normative; Land registration; Legal certainty; Doctrine","score_opus":0.015869863772220053,"score_gpt":0.2920684017147229,"score_spread":0.2761985379425029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119522914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94952166,0.006906005,0.00005188369,0.0012333043,0.0023662138,0.00086310215,0.0002581329,0.000054490207,0.03874518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154179,0.002235475,0.000022797753,0.000036253787,0.00046609505,0.000017240338,0.0003654219,0.000031261243,0.08140752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701303,0.00031433173,0.0008593835,0.0005843145,0.0008749906,0.00035394417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985254,0.00008258495,0.0006387624,0.00022785403,0.00042971954,0.00009570336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000733093,0.00037799796,0.0006153367,0.00013299305,0.0007200899,0.00028721784,0.0003229623,0.00048182544,0.00071944797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065952576,0.00022130496,0.00028022978,0.0005685125,0.00068955147,0.0006336574,0.000071341296,0.00045154383,0.00000575316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005208756,0.0013358649,0.10497053,0.0116268145,0.0040099774,0.000038146354,0.19587111,0.00037782037,0.16183239,0.37616804,0.12264398,0.01591656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052115857,0.0026861914,0.04039753,0.0075900936,0.0035110041,0.000038376384,0.06694207,0.01009142,0.07422809,0.009070832,0.7770869,0.0031458968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038311485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015498306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6544429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007912597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027174066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9680925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124228793","doi":"","title":"Dunsmuir: A View from South of the Border","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Deference; Administrative law; Charter; Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Conversation; State (computer science); Constitutional law","score_opus":0.02226851983409456,"score_gpt":0.28339309888607184,"score_spread":0.2611245790519773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124228793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43680245,0.014328244,0.00013336929,0.025661713,0.008391634,0.002047053,0.0004482475,0.00018888785,0.5119984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615222,0.0003515976,0.00015208776,0.003067901,0.0027124323,0.000014681669,0.0000036265806,0.00003306645,0.0321424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608773,0.0006657337,0.00074510725,0.0006722543,0.0010330125,0.0007961617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752903,0.00011968519,0.00043149668,0.001095564,0.00040727464,0.00041692762],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008458193,0.00037284134,0.00059946143,0.000035444424,0.0016061718,0.00030766733,0.0016368076,0.00031708134,0.026853785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027095934,0.00020906686,0.00040087535,0.000882452,0.002995198,0.0005237167,0.0004098077,0.0005791596,0.0022830914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004350345,0.0010429615,0.010914505,0.00018676228,0.0008525474,0.0000234197,0.07506834,0.00000478715,0.0034417512,0.846474,0.029707668,0.03184822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006948868,0.0001704025,0.002915097,0.00031318687,0.00013661523,7.1053734e-7,0.00096229377,0.00005753151,0.002402034,0.006742432,0.9852204,0.00038441183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06624195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030796183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096383636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060055853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125704442","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-069","title":"8.2 The Durability of Terra Nullius: Tsilhqot’in v. British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Durability; Period (music); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02206481248893614,"score_gpt":0.20944594024654015,"score_spread":0.18738112775760402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125704442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055752043,0.0025527612,0.000015444262,0.00010292214,0.0004816777,0.0010993006,0.0001584794,0.00004565268,0.98996854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13529943,0.0031651482,0.00004504741,0.00001590334,0.00008305401,7.6266815e-7,0.0000070136293,0.00002849407,0.8613551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967907,0.0002483945,0.00073798455,0.0007816759,0.00088835444,0.00055290316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793965,0.00031254478,0.0005046702,0.0006765088,0.00033608646,0.00023053912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009801494,0.0003063545,0.0008915014,0.0000768134,0.0009603878,0.00029537705,0.0015283418,0.0006232755,0.0013731263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004060417,0.00036869317,0.00061891286,0.000044347547,0.005234845,0.00018196629,0.00065529434,0.0009627388,0.000014458201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042834267,0.00019942941,0.000339462,0.0010193501,0.00065064523,0.00077758264,0.011898907,0.0000051455168,0.00006535083,0.81418085,0.0017929338,0.168642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006648993,0.000184724,0.0008920661,0.0012263575,0.00026438892,0.0000075241683,0.0007893552,0.0002035624,0.000021936163,0.012930294,0.9823487,0.00046623952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6400843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76365286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022160033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004531272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133078665","doi":"","title":"&apos;Formalizing&apos; Land Tenure in First Nations: Evaluating the Case for Reserve Tenure Reform","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land tenure; Land rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Higher education; Land use","score_opus":0.1403153404214487,"score_gpt":0.45851053267619596,"score_spread":0.31819519225474724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133078665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8096778,0.0014795484,0.000013530086,0.0931586,0.0016644107,0.0028335443,0.000065160835,0.00008003953,0.091027364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673842,0.00035006044,0.00058569416,0.00029044235,0.0013644286,0.00023776187,0.000015860795,0.00003724427,0.029734286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969197,0.00026415364,0.0006131202,0.00054950506,0.00067441683,0.0009791061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732804,0.00091970793,0.00035166842,0.00066073315,0.0005119382,0.00022787975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050785355,0.0003447438,0.0003767593,0.00019472686,0.0046006246,0.0005546353,0.00060881843,0.0004184529,0.00071129354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002867821,0.00019148912,0.00019964187,0.0012306637,0.0005188608,0.00074254733,0.0001963742,0.0011424925,0.00005811956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014111326,0.0010229764,0.0035203702,0.001078588,0.000293663,0.001388033,0.71116483,0.00034372034,0.0017655407,0.23735157,0.011062557,0.02959705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028605857,0.000905394,0.0006237916,0.00042951843,0.0001548461,0.0004514312,0.06739197,0.02450175,0.00031137918,0.0031125592,0.8984524,0.00080439256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13278665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80081385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88738984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003185168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055089075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134330747","doi":"","title":"Leases as subdivisions of land : A comparative analysis of Singapore, New South Wales & British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subdivision; Lease; Zoning; Estate; Real estate; Easement; Estate planning; Demise; Land tenure","score_opus":0.031045804987597316,"score_gpt":0.2633649694453478,"score_spread":0.2323191644577505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134330747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15651347,0.00063968956,0.004656598,0.00034588965,0.00056749623,0.001020906,0.00032668698,0.00036407443,0.8355652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8040846,0.00067986414,0.0009879969,0.000024750425,0.000084150764,4.6223985e-7,0.00027785485,0.000013907167,0.19384642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966946,0.0003262612,0.0004883961,0.000943753,0.0009282509,0.0006187054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830616,0.00013822118,0.00032321666,0.00045863888,0.0004023036,0.00037144564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058487116,0.0003551498,0.00078840216,0.0023833408,0.0018386643,0.00043463203,0.0010973475,0.0001797046,0.0011458999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029895453,0.00048303066,0.0006596098,0.0068617947,0.0017012551,0.0010156232,0.00079352554,0.00031590732,0.000063083324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023212485,0.0010612806,0.01001776,0.0007182498,0.008381895,0.002995058,0.009835785,0.0019489472,0.00001168689,0.92687994,0.017273145,0.020644119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013289686,0.00012891866,0.012805287,0.000991165,0.0054180743,0.0000035239027,0.019886933,0.0012917982,0.0000090890635,0.0011842175,0.95628506,0.0006669572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033510696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09178324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93901193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008631711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006278896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7149221427","doi":"","title":"Ontario","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02277828229182468,"score_gpt":0.19008959635275702,"score_spread":0.16731131406093233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7149221427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69915265,0.00014004314,0.00032016038,0.0006585203,0.0005666075,0.0005353314,0.0013643025,0.00012534339,0.29713702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.884198,0.0001391398,0.00023166985,0.000027419648,0.00021237592,5.088553e-8,0.000095526215,0.000034786222,0.11506102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506384,0.00023274314,0.00056796154,0.0011947779,0.0016322718,0.0013084273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996268,0.00016227285,0.00076653383,0.0011621268,0.00062476343,0.0010163485],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050025206,0.00077429245,0.0015267862,0.0005825285,0.0027382725,0.00021205576,0.0030018345,0.0006996854,0.02120911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037623933,0.0009821465,0.001250685,0.0016913799,0.004413377,0.0031361275,0.0007688288,0.0011269959,0.0015676086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064703426,0.0012549403,0.091498554,0.00038622107,0.0019985395,0.00094288896,0.84299093,0.00047239757,0.000032411524,0.013419134,0.0057516415,0.034781985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005574581,0.0009981492,0.032708775,0.0005012648,0.0009261029,0.000008409161,0.20362028,0.0003366553,0.00002738666,0.00054744695,0.75285095,0.0018999858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100805275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06911129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74709934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007411077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015159773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7153677248","doi":"","title":"CRT2 S3 Ep2: Eminent Domain: Discriminatory Land Takings and the Fight for Reparations","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eminent domain; Thriving; Power (physics); Jazz; White (mutation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Dance; Center (category theory)","score_opus":0.022756014639980993,"score_gpt":0.29247646965777657,"score_spread":0.26972045501779557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7153677248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10916797,0.13986915,0.0015013944,0.28688964,0.013860959,0.013156649,0.00087752956,0.0007908742,0.43388584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941317,0.0018587633,0.00032428556,0.0029414739,0.0026638147,0.00085517066,0.000028403898,0.00004975107,0.049961332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703133,0.00033201912,0.0005982063,0.0007831834,0.00055171404,0.000703521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980145,0.00085150363,0.00013863693,0.0004734404,0.00014058915,0.0003813072],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018022544,0.00036606946,0.0004707345,0.00007032029,0.002612666,0.0017947839,0.0005195979,0.00022886237,0.0013061533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028738898,0.0001994331,0.00033240413,0.00040764728,0.0016129611,0.0008642183,0.00016925062,0.0005309482,0.00020069811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016236705,0.00006203268,0.0000778523,0.00017261914,0.0001279927,0.000024177434,0.009038503,0.0000030047593,0.0000631408,0.9472731,0.041217126,0.0017781053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011417972,0.00011046469,0.0001485581,0.0002716789,0.00021157452,0.000010495337,0.00064988836,0.0006520909,0.000099214434,0.048685707,0.94765615,0.0003623768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008416322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013265671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.906439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015033726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034298832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161309311","doi":"10.7202/1125049ar","title":"Security of Tenure in Foreclosure Proceedings: The Judicial Role when Borrowers are Absent or Self-Represented","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; Fair Housing Act; Government (linguistics); Adversarial system; Consistency (knowledge bases); Security interest; Balance (ability); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.019482780086007144,"score_gpt":0.30902905460111485,"score_spread":0.2895462745151077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161309311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008037285,0.2890771,0.0000015183922,0.0839763,0.0006633569,0.0034336005,0.000048167225,0.00034974117,0.61441296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499202,0.044804066,0.0000567076,0.0019906044,0.00060825486,0.00012630528,0.0000056017043,0.000027408407,0.0024608853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984677,0.0001245806,0.00039246876,0.00027452665,0.00044886614,0.00029186945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994428,0.00006876067,0.000120304285,0.00016066639,0.00012824745,0.00007920338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013421917,0.00013971489,0.00037021236,0.000032094038,0.00019494786,0.0000938056,0.00034822494,0.00008609654,0.00057038874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001911446,0.000066109234,0.00014746298,0.0006096102,0.00020844422,0.0002420835,0.00005833078,0.00027635484,0.000038551967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002878785,0.00022730604,0.0018684523,0.005651461,0.00012477163,0.00007069016,0.012129352,4.0379726e-7,0.000026054544,0.788849,0.18416274,0.0068610036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089075525,0.00003198743,0.0001200277,0.004095569,0.00007052615,0.0000036688975,0.00038131993,0.000034967587,0.000026864574,0.0039647534,0.99107087,0.0001103684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076969145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022860564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007781551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017460632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W839321378","doi":"10.1890/11-0306.1","title":"Economic-Based Projections of Future Land-Use Under Alternative Economic Policy Scenarios in the Conterminous U.S.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land use; Natural resource economics; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Environmental resource management; Economic model; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.03490956156038192,"score_gpt":0.281867260074683,"score_spread":0.24695769851430108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W839321378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857833,0.00008844721,0.0002024916,0.0030571742,0.00027508076,0.0003229011,0.000052633266,0.000020322963,0.010197683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974309,0.000059751186,0.00007430375,0.00016040744,0.0004968329,8.0879886e-7,0.00000962995,0.0000063503717,0.0017610169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990199,0.00023001395,0.0001434863,0.0001589639,0.00013613931,0.00031145485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934655,0.00013114531,0.00018521283,0.00020321748,0.000046472673,0.000087369124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004760112,0.00011128022,0.00022175621,0.000212494,0.00043138955,0.000051688003,0.00042922026,0.000098540375,0.00030687885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020591326,0.000090952955,0.00013358863,0.00014919885,0.00050211215,0.00093496987,0.000045123812,0.0001556723,0.00005417825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006661482,0.00013450556,0.042585477,0.00000948494,0.000050833252,0.00000194076,0.02688351,0.00051371485,0.0000019621941,0.9292021,0.00049004384,0.000059833714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027225297,0.00020114795,0.093132526,0.000039816,0.000102909704,0.0000061205083,0.07045513,0.0006493291,0.000004310794,0.74262327,0.089562796,0.00050009775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12448999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16308556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18657878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043671016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048568437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8813401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}