{"meta":{"query_hash":"84d431f4d265","filters":{"topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination"},"cohort_total":187,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":187,"exported":187,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/84d431f4d265","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Religious+Freedom+and+Discrimination"},"results":[{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04711717255424792,"score_gpt":0.2850996094726049,"score_spread":0.23798243691835697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488097330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045797545,0.006416454,0.0054674265,0.41566026,0.0042171287,0.00007475082,0.00013328952,0.000058224097,0.52217495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835729,0.0018538662,0.0019839986,0.046905253,0.0014780429,0.00006318702,0.000057582,0.00008813244,0.111840986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98673743,0.0039359434,0.00034540953,0.0009936303,0.0046336357,0.0033540283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922712,0.0033848786,0.00036677264,0.0005826825,0.0022835436,0.0011108718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01487959,0.00039833836,0.0005704943,0.0013438046,0.020903833,0.010402609,0.0028334053,0.008687673,0.0059046783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01523893,0.00043569805,0.000508296,0.001283344,0.03789145,0.0040994952,0.0059670988,0.008739277,0.00047972504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027146923,0.000008792177,0.0005692965,0.00004831498,0.00000661144,0.00011955872,0.026476687,0.00013067496,0.00016639373,0.9235947,0.04123083,0.0076210145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039136925,0.000009851364,0.002234531,0.0002106891,0.00001876056,0.000055414537,0.012360976,0.0003783362,0.0002979916,0.08894254,0.89541435,0.000037398106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7884713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8936877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08983638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06671356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6518116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488657516","doi":"","title":"Church of Saints and Sinners","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America (Catholic Theological Society of America)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.016083185187417862,"score_gpt":0.2588470593235327,"score_spread":0.24276387413611483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488657516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24731302,0.007120881,0.00086430094,0.061260857,0.0024560501,0.00003878281,0.00007480646,0.00006367023,0.6808077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93681514,0.0010693949,0.00030248487,0.0026419898,0.00022060286,0.000007690674,0.000019741294,0.000022725797,0.058900326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998985,0.0005721206,0.000020071939,0.00005318466,0.00017044363,0.00019920059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889934,0.00016165347,0.0001012053,0.00012194449,0.00016051267,0.0005552698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013841288,0.0001362621,0.00016853187,0.00040043675,0.007175173,0.0036008304,0.0002604987,0.00068198075,0.008197612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023673263,0.000121140736,0.00007616688,0.00039614594,0.007596147,0.0017690555,0.0037129074,0.0022895967,0.0005262746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006484536,0.000042186424,0.003038522,0.00005660596,0.000005851073,0.00024403978,0.08376082,0.000047264173,0.000354693,0.81593335,0.069620825,0.02683098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002580981,0.000051455485,0.008782623,0.00023166643,0.0000046373048,0.0002372686,0.084646896,0.00011957143,0.00029980877,0.03665963,0.86892164,0.000018915807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006431658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021709362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008197612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002384948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002353588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02742374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505143777","doi":"","title":"Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?: Susan Moller Okin with Respondents","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.02843794178208949,"score_gpt":0.308119923631044,"score_spread":0.27968198184895454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505143777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010549353,0.0061061904,0.000059309365,0.9607766,0.013210545,0.00006680718,0.00025606976,0.00002020975,0.008954918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06665573,0.01221614,0.0002979842,0.80721784,0.0063627306,0.00023702695,0.00016705549,0.00009702449,0.10674853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996548,0.0008947111,0.00011052839,0.00026954612,0.0010150373,0.0011622414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860415,0.0025445463,0.000525755,0.00023036123,0.0040836283,0.006574195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00420635,0.00072258327,0.0006297595,0.0014571651,0.03273175,0.005471581,0.0016926489,0.008534649,0.008793083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018465359,0.00052320637,0.00042689664,0.0020417268,0.0042065163,0.0028329794,0.0044636414,0.014636252,0.001641615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019292625,0.00004026439,0.0034997275,0.00007009836,0.0000061369483,0.00042473746,0.028803106,0.000013150833,0.00014246201,0.001507036,0.9569933,0.008480633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000885422,0.00002324382,0.007051859,0.00037975155,0.000013296146,0.0004834798,0.22608437,0.000023626162,0.0001423547,0.0006117944,0.7651288,0.00004854001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58033216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74143916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41966784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013556052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030474018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8442787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514129879","doi":"10.2979/aft.2008.54.3.144","title":"<i>Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in a Comparative Perspective</i>, David Turton, ed.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa Today","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Ethnic group; Politics; Restructuring; Political science; Government (linguistics); Comparative politics; Sociology; Dual federalism; Development economics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.14980684495708055,"score_gpt":0.38728441280760334,"score_spread":0.2374775678505228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514129879","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010330259,0.8452543,0.00032118615,0.04763429,0.007897085,0.000014178236,0.00007588741,0.000013700744,0.08845909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24217772,0.65853214,0.000641521,0.011912944,0.0044014864,0.000052092877,0.00015746627,0.00005647326,0.08206805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904984,0.0005474114,0.000033329376,0.00007395743,0.00013503173,0.00016038062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941564,0.00029543412,0.000063719046,0.000014971608,0.00009879528,0.000111482004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016885438,0.00076520804,0.0004911066,0.0017987184,0.0057316106,0.007654558,0.000796457,0.0016691891,0.007943257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014113191,0.00033927622,0.00024687697,0.0048843096,0.003929531,0.0070495554,0.0018365636,0.0026459831,0.0010050156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008149977,0.00007758578,0.0018165145,0.0015541932,0.000028715362,0.0007518724,0.09950106,0.00029187417,0.0003149544,0.23791951,0.5572276,0.10043461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031551722,0.000013027325,0.0016312072,0.0017287154,0.0000052777295,0.0003149106,0.05175289,0.00002832412,0.00006473626,0.003954483,0.94049346,0.0000098230985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016911948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027701847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016911948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053440263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00465414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038773835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535705846","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199253623.001.0001","title":"Religious Freedom in the Liberal State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Religious persecution; Religious freedom; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Convention; Religious identity; Persecution; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.01698543093061049,"score_gpt":0.287088133275967,"score_spread":0.2701027023453565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535705846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012651081,0.006440318,0.0016754406,0.017268494,0.00032111353,0.000012348811,0.000022226122,0.0000186277,0.9615904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8334823,0.0033039593,0.00080233015,0.004806875,0.00051101664,0.000037532962,0.00003481947,0.000019205203,0.15700184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993857,0.00027853923,0.000012691954,0.000052526277,0.00017850344,0.00009193137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994418,0.00030964933,0.000033956778,0.00006924395,0.00008233006,0.000062988205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007894348,0.0001319394,0.0001644029,0.00040460238,0.002478913,0.0037480798,0.0002697987,0.0011312868,0.0049186815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010935111,0.00008365487,0.00013317901,0.0004579605,0.013024039,0.0018259196,0.0018365792,0.0031497707,0.00047473525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010256955,0.000004100627,0.000017453802,0.0000040827,2.677417e-7,0.000006899502,0.00070899155,0.000056315075,0.00001730107,0.994716,0.0024110791,0.0020564622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063109483,0.00001010121,0.00019804758,0.000114691895,0.0000013566253,0.000024050038,0.0008950824,0.0002493042,0.000081356586,0.72467303,0.27374184,0.000004888476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045508984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004505958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049186815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034256817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002411121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024855196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542646315","doi":"","title":"Catholic Social Teaching and Global Migration: Bridging the Paradox of Universal Human Rights and Territorial Self-Determination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Democracy; Globe; Immigration; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Emigration; Sociology; Christianity; Political economy; Law; Geography; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.01273899358870661,"score_gpt":0.2861739003272085,"score_spread":0.2734349067385019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542646315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10433117,0.18666825,0.0021346933,0.22012438,0.0016414938,0.000034718454,0.00003247366,0.000018819997,0.485014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269631,0.040543053,0.0003915844,0.015096435,0.0009551469,0.000026922982,0.000021701373,0.000012440213,0.015989669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738044,0.0016491087,0.00004518769,0.00012358217,0.00044164225,0.000360104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972976,0.001641245,0.00029473603,0.00012827186,0.00030847386,0.00032970705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003397263,0.00015782299,0.00027481627,0.0008196649,0.002819376,0.002657119,0.0005360898,0.0017776011,0.0035350984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036829398,0.00009283141,0.00015691262,0.00093532476,0.014090835,0.0025275936,0.0026726972,0.0027371242,0.00014073633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011460647,0.000041250525,0.0011669873,0.00030512438,0.000009454174,0.00013675958,0.0064860675,0.00019596485,0.00005678399,0.9363358,0.013332733,0.041921604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054663433,0.00009101572,0.011410845,0.001451886,0.000023489201,0.0003263625,0.020814143,0.0002872872,0.00017463912,0.25145137,0.7138969,0.000017362818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016822454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031153442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016822454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041374345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065139364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033449054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549533466","doi":"","title":"Gender Equality Versus Minority Inclusion: The Political Dilemma of Religious Arbitration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Law; Religious law; Inclusion (mineral); Dispute resolution; Religious freedom; Dilemma; Sociology; Gender studies; Islam; Geography","score_opus":0.03107506659729873,"score_gpt":0.33250604236237763,"score_spread":0.3014309757650789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549533466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24998356,0.005778624,0.006246925,0.1368807,0.00049928686,0.000047997128,0.00003313857,0.0000086029,0.60052127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886796,0.0006654241,0.00036376892,0.003388684,0.00022048672,0.000014731089,0.000004652407,0.0000049877303,0.006657672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918543,0.0044087158,0.00012212586,0.0004959961,0.0016168043,0.0015019738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944323,0.0034087815,0.0007280154,0.00030126632,0.0004992787,0.0006303726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010615412,0.00022487003,0.0003821192,0.0010134885,0.011854231,0.007591095,0.0011324983,0.0038913481,0.0036226215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012814643,0.00014327667,0.0002680051,0.0010126609,0.030693877,0.005640833,0.006208684,0.0032982659,0.00030253985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016332917,0.0000118765465,0.0015279456,0.000018395422,0.0000031460293,0.00016867787,0.02871179,0.000034745895,0.0001311109,0.96024936,0.0012937546,0.007832697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053842585,0.000062541694,0.009265813,0.0004755447,0.000030301044,0.0005472283,0.10079549,0.0005079789,0.00088567747,0.671766,0.21557888,0.00003070867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03446701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058613032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03446701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007896383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070312074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068532765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555603385","doi":"","title":"Religious Arbitration in Canada: Protecting Women by Protecting Them from Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022378622116247346,"score_gpt":0.2173995701327661,"score_spread":0.19502094801651876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555603385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5673558,0.01220326,0.0018743661,0.16317897,0.0008553366,0.00032008387,0.00071340613,0.00007405911,0.2534247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89381593,0.0041630445,0.0012055465,0.011188409,0.000060090068,0.00006787314,0.00015859552,0.000038112903,0.08930239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490273,0.0006847944,0.0000858247,0.000346026,0.0012178983,0.0027626168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470747,0.0007242971,0.00031228727,0.00017695712,0.0012597912,0.0028190874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025131076,0.00027629748,0.00036420845,0.0011074623,0.030882161,0.006651889,0.00211282,0.0026540249,0.009580514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072377683,0.00040514756,0.0002585038,0.00261593,0.008935754,0.0017362101,0.005662442,0.0033958813,0.00046911577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025482688,0.00018403323,0.076559804,0.0005537599,0.00005487616,0.0021849934,0.26697633,0.0005632764,0.002031871,0.3101246,0.120019495,0.22049218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048357924,0.000055358254,0.07425516,0.0004717984,0.00003650192,0.00030507467,0.19651268,0.00046752542,0.0007453813,0.008984341,0.7179993,0.000118643984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13703053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13703053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34333798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","score_opus":0.054627436617493065,"score_gpt":0.31406249022491767,"score_spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586913609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15062289,0.05402511,0.0048577986,0.09855411,0.0011910656,0.00014971523,0.00014455564,0.000051204697,0.6904035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94491386,0.025608214,0.0024002022,0.015608737,0.00057280844,0.00019876867,0.00014577969,0.00006073566,0.010490959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873935,0.0071858857,0.00063402904,0.0007523217,0.0019483707,0.002085827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157035,0.0055217673,0.0007205105,0.00047663433,0.0010047029,0.00070604245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153278215,0.000494847,0.00050869543,0.004363909,0.0055694,0.014706625,0.0015987311,0.005397956,0.003416016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543417,0.0004429699,0.00057962997,0.005521543,0.024271557,0.006489219,0.005889675,0.0076913843,0.0003519313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028855582,0.000056653385,0.0010604428,0.00023267636,0.000011178738,0.00010659814,0.021659771,0.00040025194,0.00019205589,0.95495313,0.002223342,0.019075014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007182311,0.00034660895,0.027795525,0.008051199,0.00009188805,0.0005852539,0.27592173,0.00129167,0.0023813918,0.2846125,0.39867353,0.00017688202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011733493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011558242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153278215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012885302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010175251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093489826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590246975","doi":"","title":"Coaching bivocational ministers for greater ministry effectiveness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Coaching; Political science; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.023425661144968333,"score_gpt":0.29521238792467147,"score_spread":0.2717867267797031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590246975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9213407,0.00030707574,0.0027825483,0.013452934,0.00033720784,0.0004583932,0.000029118753,0.00007218606,0.061219748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98970675,0.00017106059,0.002884584,0.00076934014,0.000039826013,0.00011017014,0.000013954696,0.000013909284,0.0062903576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394023,0.0039121066,0.00008749417,0.00019695013,0.00046075837,0.0014024577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889713,0.0016198581,0.0007967911,0.00058956555,0.0010617769,0.006960607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005993374,0.0002330614,0.00025993327,0.00062004843,0.007595004,0.0032025124,0.0007322476,0.0008133747,0.009868699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012356695,0.00023034237,0.00025260617,0.00052380265,0.0019081124,0.001317912,0.0058735544,0.0031722726,0.00074099447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056607864,0.008713354,0.15025263,0.0006433282,0.00006625755,0.00093585945,0.19635469,0.0005651525,0.0057916637,0.028198978,0.046019167,0.56189287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037039656,0.002610061,0.23715664,0.0009360641,0.00006571706,0.0007552444,0.44432572,0.0013232565,0.0023046518,0.007122422,0.30291554,0.000114382514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044980934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035637796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009868699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027843188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0082994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03301412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599675491","doi":"","title":"Eweida v United Kingdom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of religion; Religious freedom; Kingdom; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Accommodation; Political science; Clothing; High Court; Sociology; History; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.04548782921124649,"score_gpt":0.3187942160396319,"score_spread":0.2733063868283854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599675491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041520007,0.016301462,0.0018800092,0.048445534,0.0036720405,0.00020628181,0.000734342,0.00017776195,0.88706255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30962914,0.004078411,0.0012720694,0.10438872,0.0005471269,0.0002759942,0.00041045752,0.00013881442,0.57925934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99199355,0.0012587556,0.0005597573,0.0011527304,0.00240142,0.0026338883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966558,0.0014756231,0.00022379373,0.0004117129,0.00092099747,0.00031193273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003726944,0.00046543794,0.00076553115,0.0014031283,0.0074715475,0.007822788,0.0013807439,0.01314428,0.021783482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014933997,0.00073133747,0.0009427794,0.0012005441,0.0028465956,0.0031667075,0.0049866233,0.008647558,0.0039087217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002513277,0.000050389946,0.0025537298,0.0002954949,0.00006353081,0.00363781,0.0037512097,0.00019301192,0.0020799716,0.7874588,0.16691098,0.032753684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585328,0.000059283906,0.0022468278,0.0004216543,0.00004143186,0.00040572204,0.00081416056,0.00010950395,0.0008832392,0.014644279,0.9802514,0.00006408566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1044933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17155327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1044933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005797569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070355437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20777017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1618917261","doi":"","title":"El tratamiento jurídico y político de la diversidad religiosa en Québec y Canadá","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Migraciones. Publicación del Instituto Universitario de Estudios sobre Migraciones","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Diversity (politics); Politics; Political science; Commission; Interculturalism; Welfare economics; Humanities; Geography; Public administration; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Multiculturalism; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007145560658882547,"score_gpt":0.2588630837279757,"score_spread":0.2517175230690931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1618917261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49773985,0.04614573,0.0016957758,0.24886477,0.0010212777,0.00012823986,0.00071021926,0.000096574986,0.20359756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94280684,0.009498651,0.00067806186,0.009472101,0.000109294495,0.000036595527,0.0001470362,0.00001973454,0.037231717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823916,0.0003226343,0.000027613709,0.000111920985,0.00044851686,0.0008501303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657935,0.0004921939,0.00020633261,0.00007675539,0.0013548713,0.0012904868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023137918,0.00022935664,0.00025876617,0.0012745861,0.012014208,0.004405865,0.0013645062,0.001560306,0.005019335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031131315,0.00018204433,0.00021902169,0.0017608402,0.0049257,0.00096918666,0.0016825444,0.0030181,0.00018585591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026505374,0.00022324639,0.091848865,0.0004249858,0.00009559399,0.0019292149,0.037289347,0.0020224235,0.0017380363,0.36055806,0.2625392,0.241066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010117832,0.000083378996,0.17983373,0.0012550575,0.000092504066,0.000302894,0.06616379,0.0025405984,0.00082504365,0.010179387,0.7384576,0.00016491214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99872404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11434115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11434115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19786532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82960695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1674632769","doi":"","title":"Faith Based Arbitration in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Sharia; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Faith; Judaism; State (computer science); Dispute resolution; Islam; Alternative dispute resolution; History; Theology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.012123558176166794,"score_gpt":0.26459910352147525,"score_spread":0.25247554534530847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1674632769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041151468,0.07125995,0.0057780277,0.103289016,0.001539365,0.00013043755,0.00030323272,0.00005013124,0.7764984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7663683,0.03652672,0.0040004184,0.012624339,0.00038489595,0.00009113571,0.00017163075,0.00005097465,0.17978156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930307,0.0013131069,0.0002947608,0.00041628352,0.0036441674,0.0013009822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946319,0.001846199,0.000600717,0.00034201506,0.0021404054,0.0004388073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00577274,0.00016391656,0.00033135983,0.0011962183,0.008120595,0.0055283024,0.0012492418,0.0023716153,0.005608861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009781233,0.0002817054,0.00031398953,0.0030616946,0.008386419,0.0021923785,0.003410707,0.0019023572,0.0003748044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028507962,0.000008875614,0.001814244,0.00026822888,0.000015957574,0.00062964007,0.010778891,0.00052742276,0.00028666374,0.87002826,0.062164735,0.05344861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011492416,0.00000784434,0.0058764596,0.00033035217,0.000012921136,0.000142274,0.0033423798,0.00033127464,0.00023651391,0.038559124,0.951115,0.000034368673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9339267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9672579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06837013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06837013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08294921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49606234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17498086","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2516.2007.01466.x","title":"Canonization Practices and the Canadian Boikshelf.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays on Canadian writing","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Art; History","score_opus":0.019733273582217117,"score_gpt":0.29013631394639977,"score_spread":0.27040304036418267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17498086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06443418,0.023639563,0.0005205601,0.118116915,0.0023117443,0.000032627642,0.00021237036,0.00003707128,0.790695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8631137,0.005085515,0.0004095879,0.008237937,0.0001903278,0.000018517132,0.000042429736,0.000040791907,0.12286123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964042,0.0005241612,0.00006814028,0.00025648423,0.0014137257,0.001333287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960563,0.0012785498,0.00019702868,0.00018542736,0.001603072,0.00067965663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023364949,0.00042192146,0.00029721254,0.0020023468,0.04363159,0.009793216,0.001286406,0.0033555082,0.008743379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008469984,0.00026062116,0.00021373424,0.004251927,0.020748282,0.0020993822,0.0028433125,0.006149969,0.00047492536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043497927,0.000013368826,0.0011663975,0.000104368395,0.0000074138993,0.00027012522,0.105410874,0.000074122065,0.00022769884,0.7420002,0.12501405,0.025667794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010964554,0.0000069785465,0.004653379,0.00024309866,0.000011814753,0.00007840495,0.058812134,0.000062300154,0.00026842137,0.012972349,0.92284304,0.00003719754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9787458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087245636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087245636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08920733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6330143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882741937","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789.011","title":"Political Liberalism, Islamic Family Law, and Family Law Pluralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Israeli law; Sharia; Politics; Islam; Religious law; Comparative law; Sociology; Private law; Black letter law; Legal realism; History","score_opus":0.033497423835823215,"score_gpt":0.23300911720811548,"score_spread":0.19951169337229227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882741937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16874404,0.011885226,0.006015246,0.054934237,0.0003121456,0.000026022564,0.000016854116,0.000023816376,0.75804245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98730785,0.0014010281,0.00056709885,0.0017022166,0.00013634334,0.000012934612,0.0000051397074,0.0000051693883,0.00886231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980641,0.0010855171,0.000032681197,0.00012692365,0.00033798345,0.00035272984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987025,0.0007439977,0.00017651031,0.00008982224,0.000110600784,0.0001764551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00216986,0.00013157618,0.0001798866,0.00057890394,0.0068297423,0.0045600687,0.00045913213,0.0017521166,0.0018843837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019951302,0.00013750809,0.00017225706,0.0007832089,0.036888123,0.0026165708,0.002564824,0.003081434,0.00012921345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022639133,0.000005790983,0.00016342835,0.000005057444,7.9612465e-7,0.000061615865,0.0055867312,0.000060582843,0.000033493383,0.9913378,0.0007729728,0.0019695756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012095117,0.000015369673,0.002030003,0.000073214556,0.0000025176328,0.00015563183,0.008696439,0.0005191663,0.000117406504,0.9075641,0.08080429,0.000009680219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011096842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012234789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011096842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057212287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032139323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041510582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983103512","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs031","title":"Britain's Religious Tribunals: 'Joint Governance' in Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Transformative learning; Accommodation; Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Tribunal; Political science; Corporate governance; Archbishop; Theology; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.047161122174245305,"score_gpt":0.36973777557530374,"score_spread":0.32257665340105846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983103512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5234341,0.0071506957,0.008888718,0.10162608,0.00070166594,0.0000798801,0.00002070201,0.000076150405,0.358022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057674,0.00030266782,0.00046867647,0.0019180023,0.000043903525,0.000012124481,0.000004514371,0.00000951128,0.0066637904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787957,0.0135571025,0.00051417144,0.001120716,0.0029448923,0.0030673128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98709434,0.0052369162,0.0013927568,0.0017501218,0.0011546427,0.0033712417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011609376,0.00013216819,0.00028464192,0.0007902537,0.013065693,0.009212464,0.0014164195,0.004817057,0.0055980366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023671396,0.00033351558,0.00021708982,0.0018794002,0.034986746,0.004542954,0.01240371,0.005318934,0.00058786257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027672479,0.0000992395,0.0068375156,0.00009872353,0.00000835652,0.00080048275,0.21632056,0.0002521191,0.00037111907,0.7145024,0.013005869,0.047676034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007987471,0.0002086907,0.035848126,0.0008493401,0.000013767453,0.000900721,0.29159456,0.0012392075,0.00031474547,0.17219104,0.49667627,0.000083729545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03909537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06315127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03909537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009630504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011676165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0777356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991718069","doi":"10.7202/1008036ar","title":"Beyond Objective and Subjective: Assessing the Legitimacy of Religious Claims to Accommodation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Reinterpretation; Argument (complex analysis); Disadvantage; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Accommodation; Law; Law and economics; Plaintiff; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01931340330095821,"score_gpt":0.33976955187325747,"score_spread":0.32045614857229926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991718069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7254351,0.002201295,0.03439485,0.0084689725,0.00022201757,0.0003682703,0.0003585956,0.000037312002,0.2285136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698514,0.0001712823,0.0018619365,0.00022015662,0.00008128924,0.000069407084,0.00004894663,0.0000075127255,0.00055433495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95274293,0.025569636,0.0038002555,0.0020246594,0.014585308,0.0012772394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57012236,0.3144908,0.062333543,0.02224747,0.02423988,0.00656602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048763093,0.00045663724,0.00086556404,0.014272391,0.003452362,0.010724266,0.00230728,0.004477474,0.0063384557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29278636,0.00035701832,0.000765056,0.0063397293,0.038114816,0.016254898,0.009540042,0.0038877248,0.0003683111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000451695,0.0004577584,0.279336,0.00064667716,0.0003293075,0.00090143736,0.049136333,0.0014054292,0.00092688564,0.6174915,0.0012736495,0.047643308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011431614,0.0005912628,0.22679451,0.0016432023,0.00018851807,0.0011447826,0.06758516,0.009018861,0.0018304063,0.6747054,0.016141776,0.00024191797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016933663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027268336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048763093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026776982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015761219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.257887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020443408","doi":"10.1080/11926422.2014.934863","title":"Canada's Office of Religious Freedom: notes for a genealogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Foreign Policy Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Geopolitics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Ottoman empire; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.017988532997597777,"score_gpt":0.27843815776305836,"score_spread":0.2604496247654606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020443408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0145467315,0.017020604,0.0007073417,0.5775775,0.0074360846,0.000049771428,0.000538049,0.000054013035,0.38207006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35449433,0.016531397,0.0014968346,0.18253215,0.0017836422,0.00006870703,0.0002804047,0.00013338627,0.4426792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986344,0.00012664,0.00002654073,0.00012321353,0.00052863173,0.0005604894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987097,0.00033355175,0.000047415288,0.000056191395,0.00053787394,0.00031527173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011112802,0.00033211568,0.00029252545,0.00086642674,0.022841865,0.007531867,0.0012071737,0.004736338,0.008892439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022407381,0.00019314926,0.00026386423,0.0017977151,0.012795452,0.0019379744,0.0015583207,0.010038674,0.0007225895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014618581,0.000016580922,0.0008212263,0.00006239144,0.0000041986914,0.00024093279,0.007591681,0.00013867502,0.00013585771,0.6136087,0.36512595,0.012239198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070616343,0.00000466871,0.0016255681,0.00012251647,0.0000048137467,0.000040491093,0.0070255157,0.00008233631,0.00010642467,0.009413196,0.9815435,0.000023924242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98637795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05743283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05743283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11575649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41670632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202991644","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139104173","title":"Religion, Charity and Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Legislation; Abortion; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018520079173860768,"score_gpt":0.23904843466427786,"score_spread":0.2205283554904171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202991644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002798354,0.038978666,0.00041971187,0.019603554,0.0014839072,0.000015867548,0.000023965247,0.0000246101,0.9366513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11365977,0.024487218,0.00093783176,0.011467604,0.0014049424,0.000072587114,0.000050285093,0.000037725353,0.8478821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994306,0.00024535332,0.000011756861,0.000041524734,0.00017518565,0.00009552306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969053,0.00011916103,0.000028234586,0.000038010534,0.000042291944,0.00008176449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005919016,0.00023205209,0.00019507151,0.0006841684,0.003683423,0.004098767,0.00041872764,0.0018785408,0.016199064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001050687,0.00013542286,0.00014245114,0.0010885975,0.0077329725,0.0024066635,0.0026767447,0.0027287172,0.0024888087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004490942,0.00002625422,0.00014334763,0.000060532224,0.000001551226,0.00006387553,0.0027232347,0.00007384711,0.000050728537,0.85929596,0.10050288,0.03705329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034065195,0.000008233056,0.00037496758,0.00018512292,0.0000010076348,0.000099719386,0.0012142158,0.00003540783,0.000021786356,0.07883809,0.91921467,0.000003351465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007107531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016360281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016199064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00325138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004017646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05419123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030039118","doi":"10.1177/002096430405800304","title":"The Righteousness of the Law and the Righteousness of Faith in Romans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Righteousness; Faith; Philosophy; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0040865069613479355,"score_gpt":0.25399765730473217,"score_spread":0.24991115034338424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030039118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06651096,0.0082358625,0.004868091,0.0328761,0.0006275208,0.00002274513,0.000039833987,0.000027092912,0.8867918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759747,0.0012410177,0.00084458967,0.0024569575,0.00025134694,0.000013934552,0.000013301948,0.000022443795,0.019181747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950506,0.0032338898,0.00015005439,0.00032298965,0.00069724396,0.00054523046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978295,0.0010777975,0.00026472856,0.00032475713,0.000258034,0.00024511566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035322136,0.00022050246,0.00036821418,0.00069089764,0.0059398613,0.0057430374,0.0004047922,0.0023466563,0.004271034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061696903,0.00023394993,0.00020921257,0.0007126752,0.05032897,0.0042420523,0.0030487608,0.0052852333,0.00074116397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074880063,0.0000069603925,0.00012802103,0.000008826428,8.242351e-7,0.000031584124,0.0053128563,0.000023284763,0.00003099941,0.9914518,0.0011713023,0.0018260386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026299187,0.000018311877,0.0010163937,0.000121476616,0.0000026220239,0.00017179934,0.0046050134,0.00015874844,0.00015750105,0.8830276,0.11067875,0.000015485935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030681866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042817625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059398613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023856405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017339166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018680394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035467982","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000177","title":"Multiculturalism meets privatisation: the case of faith-based arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law; Multiculturalism; Religious law; Family law; Supreme court; Faith; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law and economics; Islam","score_opus":0.03095093799431146,"score_gpt":0.3302311450385649,"score_spread":0.2992802070442534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035467982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32314104,0.0013079514,0.02245207,0.09107704,0.00043249415,0.00016515229,0.000030874155,0.000052298692,0.56134117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893702,0.000094773124,0.00079576584,0.0019995281,0.0000701905,0.00003472671,0.0000025864738,0.0000089756995,0.0076232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98207664,0.008968421,0.00046374902,0.0015911772,0.0023538924,0.004546169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881126,0.006935909,0.00086581736,0.001516106,0.0014646865,0.0011049213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017872434,0.0003156168,0.00074950967,0.00089000195,0.029117774,0.013448592,0.0020802687,0.013465095,0.0072798566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018309422,0.0005354252,0.0010145168,0.00095787825,0.047683813,0.009381248,0.015408896,0.01164308,0.0004161076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000589704,0.000013424448,0.0001757576,0.0000060732177,0.0000027197036,0.00034531727,0.0055096936,0.00010579831,0.00006941454,0.9926737,0.0004572126,0.0006350905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102698934,0.000049215327,0.000780997,0.00019073466,0.000036017726,0.00071468495,0.018962616,0.0035903938,0.00085089303,0.90640324,0.0682547,0.00006384888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036928445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038469933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036928445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014605744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012863742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10597259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055456844","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.62","title":"Prejudice Unveiled: The Niqab in Court–","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Multiculturalism; Political science; Prejudice (legal term); Mythology; Islam; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013154296934794954,"score_gpt":0.26007015686746193,"score_spread":0.246915859932667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055456844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2423939,0.0015530883,0.0056080013,0.19256872,0.0052524745,0.000260795,0.00014956499,0.00020118304,0.5520123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8656579,0.0004707395,0.00091653335,0.076600276,0.00076411705,0.00006342245,0.00003893183,0.00005990743,0.055428103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98659176,0.0043494003,0.0005650252,0.001130911,0.003372171,0.003990831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886734,0.005190828,0.00063240697,0.0010484066,0.0025190667,0.001935837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009542786,0.0003129516,0.0005755539,0.0012577567,0.028895967,0.008673095,0.002226584,0.01674449,0.012197665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030818773,0.00055082736,0.00062278315,0.0009129699,0.00971837,0.0039734,0.0066398326,0.02349062,0.00146021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011596658,0.00038909362,0.013804575,0.00012046961,0.0000880751,0.019903142,0.12508024,0.00037414732,0.0044726436,0.5898148,0.19123255,0.054604348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007613409,0.00022685957,0.015489547,0.0010782736,0.00013432193,0.0055133556,0.1346471,0.0018209991,0.0038893577,0.11854362,0.7182541,0.00032639626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10832103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25372434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009700122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012686696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21538109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205819075","doi":"10.5250/fronjwomestud.34.2.0134","title":"The Question of Muslim Women's Rights and the Ontario Shari'ah Tribunals: Examining Liberal Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers A Journal of Women Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01992378099291489,"score_gpt":0.2871852257690191,"score_spread":0.26726144477610425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W205819075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6041804,0.0009589287,0.00026405623,0.05509282,0.000093802344,0.000029987577,0.00008539228,0.0000043898303,0.33929023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98984164,0.0002246097,0.0000577076,0.0012482144,0.000026478228,0.000009454447,0.000008040875,0.0000026853895,0.008581242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971302,0.00067696226,0.000057075813,0.00014145866,0.000736136,0.0012582464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247015,0.004456476,0.00071344594,0.00038784038,0.0009856038,0.0009864125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040669227,0.00017870682,0.00028083014,0.00088341365,0.0223233,0.0073529542,0.0015293079,0.004292893,0.0062611294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011009293,0.00022173073,0.00021269156,0.0014883796,0.046567235,0.002943189,0.0041720625,0.003732761,0.0002740183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014987991,0.000066355875,0.01621861,0.00007779094,0.00001350639,0.00040893245,0.30980602,0.000114640854,0.00057378237,0.652615,0.0072076614,0.012747759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007650901,0.00004435855,0.062456243,0.00035863754,0.000032255623,0.00012459826,0.6808398,0.00033673053,0.0005266234,0.11999661,0.13515083,0.000056820023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7321204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87236065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2678796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03044991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03921717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5389144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063112049","doi":"10.7202/1008034ar","title":"Nationalism, Secularism and Liberal Neutrality: The Danish Case of Judges and Religious Symbols","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Neutrality; Nationalism; Law; Parliament; Political science; Danish; Politics; Islam; Separation of church and state; Mainstream; Legislation; State (computer science); Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.018456475609155004,"score_gpt":0.3012128706937708,"score_spread":0.2827563950846158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063112049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43315542,0.004685454,0.001934118,0.03634809,0.00022598302,0.000030402944,0.00006483808,0.0000063238126,0.5235494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923488,0.00044487807,0.00012836079,0.0010707425,0.000025944693,0.000007232407,0.000007158441,0.0000032253777,0.005963767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885477,0.0049611107,0.00032508568,0.00089160004,0.0017868498,0.0034876522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334913,0.004467305,0.00059231435,0.00042180566,0.000462598,0.0007067689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073265093,0.00028044215,0.00063427596,0.0009872415,0.021234648,0.011775923,0.0012455181,0.010433249,0.00376394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008907157,0.00043504813,0.0005004947,0.001393233,0.032524474,0.0043877955,0.00676322,0.006792035,0.0003532764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023260029,0.00001701036,0.0010704314,0.000020097152,0.0000068356776,0.0005618282,0.020015502,0.00010968337,0.000101623635,0.97598165,0.0011090101,0.0009830932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002703862,0.00009067641,0.011319986,0.00052308023,0.00010594486,0.0012665347,0.10054448,0.0014259111,0.0009792423,0.6815773,0.20172524,0.00017117585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116837226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1614936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116837226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012756652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008200632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23231435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105475502","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-41821-6_30","title":"Faith in Law? Diffusing Tensions Between Diversity and Equality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Philosophy and politics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Faith; Obligation; Separation of church and state; Realm; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11529711040852335,"score_gpt":0.31320111606263185,"score_spread":0.19790400565410848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105475502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043938767,0.009870053,0.008452967,0.10489542,0.000988176,0.00002078299,0.000035333782,0.00003137866,0.83176714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250781,0.0027155047,0.0016634887,0.006237354,0.00053847383,0.000033339224,0.0000247865,0.00006613175,0.06364281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709487,0.0018671248,0.000050488394,0.00023975605,0.00047429118,0.00027342225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629325,0.002588324,0.00015084303,0.0003718988,0.0002582788,0.00033740082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005592574,0.0002517339,0.00037094014,0.0007932826,0.0043796557,0.010437933,0.000932334,0.0033921474,0.007881911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008437784,0.00023482686,0.00013962969,0.0012067839,0.037327882,0.017418664,0.0057184002,0.0066749514,0.0007288491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026976984,0.0000069951957,0.00008240519,0.00000960633,9.2623964e-7,0.000014153746,0.008759273,0.000028405699,0.00003872522,0.9814245,0.0026756087,0.00695667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041850813,0.0000035343262,0.00019923862,0.0000800374,0.0000012868264,0.000021346836,0.007854067,0.000108320026,0.000056200082,0.9264504,0.065217435,0.000004042845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027155692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047813104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010437933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037246712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038454267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029576719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115370753","doi":"10.1017/s0008197313000718","title":"THE GOD “DILUTION”? RELIGION, DISCRIMINATION AND THE CASE FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Normative; Reasonable accommodation; Disadvantage; Compromise; Religious discrimination; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.014983419445327386,"score_gpt":0.2772541085213401,"score_spread":0.2622706890760127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115370753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23311779,0.0034968373,0.0047627385,0.19477737,0.00055455684,0.00003933741,0.000045322016,0.000026566686,0.56317955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98979926,0.00017943468,0.00029487864,0.0039265635,0.00005132283,0.0000062158424,0.0000030820079,0.000004152733,0.005735124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954724,0.002021763,0.00011893615,0.0002864783,0.00095597276,0.0011443908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602085,0.0022323714,0.00033068634,0.00039424142,0.00060788426,0.00041400752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044713398,0.00013796278,0.0002518232,0.0006086169,0.008661144,0.0063073407,0.0012653725,0.0071452144,0.004004644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009776414,0.00019351997,0.00031541198,0.0005064923,0.04278287,0.0040329336,0.0044445735,0.0065188725,0.00028883768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011166531,0.000008167248,0.0004960031,0.000010527046,0.0000013830185,0.00020468734,0.004210722,0.000057827954,0.00007431483,0.99081975,0.002071114,0.002034303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056124838,0.000055492867,0.0051888954,0.0005435935,0.000022024544,0.0008213635,0.039361414,0.0012174296,0.0007844561,0.71786284,0.2339982,0.00008815877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12668107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14573762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12668107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105740605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007155938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25188744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012421256337278697,"score_gpt":0.2969896724442739,"score_spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125280111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18494521,0.01926068,0.017783025,0.13228251,0.007585705,0.0006404997,0.00016326162,0.00011682222,0.6372223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80407894,0.0019932035,0.011439528,0.029591884,0.0010267454,0.00041022978,0.0000800947,0.000043280103,0.1513361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881621,0.005445755,0.00069241377,0.0013555317,0.0025090831,0.0018351253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944127,0.0018582193,0.00043421565,0.00061049144,0.0018957151,0.0007885683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012290298,0.00041454405,0.0004387803,0.0010513013,0.013996373,0.013247452,0.0013226017,0.01245845,0.002390946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014376652,0.0005826653,0.00040019501,0.0008013205,0.0137542235,0.003254339,0.004881962,0.010962001,0.00052768737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016474567,0.000016473925,0.00050188636,0.000022688142,0.0000028697693,0.00013086827,0.0052420897,0.00010660347,0.00018833317,0.97969383,0.010564977,0.003512896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007197383,0.00014599541,0.0044177496,0.00076924596,0.000025150066,0.00043411614,0.012332064,0.00091868645,0.001056956,0.1341249,0.8455146,0.00018857227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031570964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04008922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031570964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00917624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017800262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06657857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129410355","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rws005","title":"How Religious Arbitration Could Enhance Personal Autonomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Autonomy; Religious freedom; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Law and economics; Law; State (computer science); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.01715009676357333,"score_gpt":0.2908915983203651,"score_spread":0.2737415015567918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129410355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24351163,0.00071774295,0.024612479,0.041816168,0.0002869506,0.00006206739,0.000026970887,0.000053535496,0.68891245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927799,0.00007075265,0.0012978659,0.0009234228,0.000058591602,0.000012393431,0.000003779963,0.0000066618873,0.0048467554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247277,0.004104049,0.00022408584,0.0006682622,0.0013278591,0.0012029902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99053055,0.0048650363,0.0009498156,0.001967266,0.00080357894,0.00088378007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008199523,0.00015390615,0.0002768998,0.00052117335,0.003337835,0.004640209,0.00084518304,0.0035682197,0.0089749815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019107468,0.00018811625,0.0006328437,0.00032979096,0.013248436,0.0058017513,0.0076470682,0.003573367,0.000749047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027264468,0.00006123406,0.0013782468,0.000020108313,0.000008103809,0.00019937193,0.0053394507,0.0004626143,0.00061073335,0.98175186,0.0011878804,0.008953114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005373003,0.00007559645,0.0028363883,0.00007620396,0.00001936047,0.00029776504,0.0024471737,0.001605678,0.001049612,0.9494997,0.04200971,0.000028961413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012938996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015031941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0089749815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015728567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021695907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04336375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143688148","doi":"10.1093/icon/mos048","title":"Religious law as foreign law in constitutional interpretation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013054255779701764,"score_gpt":0.3055705611410323,"score_spread":0.29251630536133055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143688148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07461617,0.009486006,0.14556776,0.071437925,0.001361322,0.00012286672,0.00008835219,0.00013290282,0.6971867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743532,0.0013188485,0.0089806635,0.0054325075,0.0007124876,0.00009412265,0.00002314278,0.00004442098,0.009040654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995787,0.006563292,0.00041983198,0.00085852284,0.0014458222,0.0007546821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026626,0.0073569,0.0005399996,0.0011140419,0.00051985093,0.00020289177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013667181,0.00029918874,0.0006427878,0.0016185812,0.005334601,0.0084737735,0.0014748648,0.0052294047,0.0031147047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011705877,0.00038469856,0.00077274477,0.0011830493,0.04819498,0.010093297,0.005285198,0.0079244645,0.0003696004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013884251,0.0000015280937,0.000039807583,0.0000047772037,7.1164817e-7,0.000016516038,0.0008693756,0.000029779947,0.000027324357,0.99807113,0.00014524313,0.00079238927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013176559,0.000017808681,0.00020542806,0.00010704875,0.000009808016,0.00007518493,0.0011483509,0.00039967048,0.0002549005,0.963127,0.03462659,0.00001502149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039203987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00484589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013667181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040210416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004004707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07227981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144764777","doi":"","title":"Canada: Dignity in Diversity? A Reflection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights (Essays)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Diversity (politics); Reflection (computer programming); Geography; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0731572997856404,"score_gpt":0.2740758707257618,"score_spread":0.2009185709401214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144764777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077128885,0.006611342,0.00024403179,0.936493,0.0045510624,0.000022624557,0.0000625814,0.000012154564,0.044290274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31749874,0.0091412375,0.0006268111,0.5716455,0.003108424,0.00004624401,0.0000419559,0.00008936901,0.097801775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897177,0.0018023305,0.00026967938,0.00084075454,0.0026745002,0.0046950155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815993,0.0059621055,0.00055249844,0.0004914956,0.0052405596,0.0061539775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006792026,0.00071015686,0.001140469,0.0012191486,0.041822515,0.02084252,0.0044917567,0.030580008,0.010632698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018611468,0.00063310127,0.00079048635,0.0025422643,0.04386652,0.0092621,0.009644522,0.049905412,0.000628361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049217004,0.00005609877,0.0008797882,0.0001870396,0.00003874839,0.001070578,0.078715585,0.00020257747,0.00039177356,0.35243756,0.54711944,0.018851629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033913977,0.00001345945,0.0013509309,0.0004374431,0.000026021451,0.00018283175,0.12749913,0.00012888378,0.00027088044,0.04051384,0.8294355,0.000107089574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96953994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117820956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117820956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22863922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8548549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152695323","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778937","title":"Liberalism, Group Rights and the Boundaries of Toleration: The Case of Minority Religious Schools in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Public administration; Toleration; Flourishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Liberalism; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.015023556444042454,"score_gpt":0.26731162320920276,"score_spread":0.2522880667651603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152695323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67118186,0.0011081124,0.0011304955,0.05289863,0.00009591705,0.00009081625,0.0000721621,0.000014948691,0.27340707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98272175,0.00027909107,0.00017087802,0.0013601418,0.00001767972,0.000021511489,0.000011513742,0.0000069183293,0.015410551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944548,0.00110533,0.000082813465,0.00023634441,0.0007495081,0.0033712303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964747,0.0010084057,0.0004260162,0.00016271134,0.0005565102,0.0013716645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023560983,0.00026014305,0.000425302,0.00071208354,0.05686577,0.0073007075,0.0018501601,0.0045672413,0.004913491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005299592,0.0003319071,0.00048017615,0.0017922608,0.023790495,0.0025736953,0.0060108593,0.0042851446,0.00020618268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008839601,0.00006265574,0.016603783,0.000072314724,0.000015400263,0.0034501827,0.27476412,0.0005749822,0.00048905384,0.6853501,0.008659515,0.00986943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018098255,0.000055644196,0.04379081,0.0003140655,0.00007691622,0.0007039659,0.4967592,0.001280827,0.00051598175,0.11607164,0.3401253,0.00012471883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11495831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11495831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08776746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153447884","doi":"10.3138/tjt.25.2.239","title":"Beyond Secularism? Rethinking the “Secular” in a Religiously Plural Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Secularity; Secularization; Sociology; Ideology; Neutrality; Secular state; Context (archaeology); Dialogical self; Plural; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.012971374005007946,"score_gpt":0.2919879738528455,"score_spread":0.27901659984783755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153447884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41800413,0.007732183,0.01254203,0.16468811,0.0020908457,0.0000508829,0.0000441726,0.000050902167,0.3947967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964599,0.0002840686,0.00039781487,0.0011642098,0.000115989766,0.0000049416826,0.0000033580357,0.000007676181,0.0015621434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950498,0.0036684147,0.00009451527,0.0002863452,0.00049666764,0.00040428466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964529,0.0014865415,0.00042566148,0.00050357654,0.000471269,0.0006601315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006640248,0.0002763199,0.00047252415,0.0007309786,0.010795327,0.008482135,0.0010731755,0.0028801402,0.00273883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047866846,0.00017686973,0.00019683881,0.0008498904,0.07772272,0.00665043,0.0069075404,0.0061636353,0.00016717051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016905202,0.000021971422,0.00056992006,0.00003317254,0.0000030395213,0.00010906855,0.079740174,0.00008384752,0.0002714381,0.912899,0.0013716727,0.004879869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024607034,0.00008466647,0.003382332,0.00051033637,0.00001495122,0.0002189901,0.20281349,0.00074175437,0.0007790099,0.6008507,0.19053951,0.000039681086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014904081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033005733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014904081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008572994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060152677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06220174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182189785","doi":"10.82308/12036","title":"Civil marriage commissioners in the province of Saskatchewan: religious freedom and public service","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil service; Political science; Service (business); Public service; Public administration; Law; Business","score_opus":0.015546305248728718,"score_gpt":0.26059533468375645,"score_spread":0.24504902943502774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182189785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8788018,0.0037197785,0.00027555748,0.039212104,0.00014709188,0.000078723446,0.00029442192,0.0000066588677,0.077463746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98014635,0.0023136216,0.00016280364,0.002437616,0.0000142379595,0.000016801043,0.000076450786,0.000003331535,0.014828721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982141,0.00039530348,0.000046565627,0.00008872999,0.00024492457,0.0010104724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678576,0.00087619026,0.00036458272,0.0000823587,0.0007522213,0.0011389225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014916288,0.00014695301,0.00023200343,0.0011818548,0.012562765,0.0042304406,0.00095723424,0.0012279581,0.005690457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034270545,0.00027089234,0.00017384806,0.0033873694,0.005843406,0.0014491065,0.0032157048,0.0025902428,0.00028402277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002848705,0.0002787518,0.34124303,0.00056929723,0.000090384914,0.0045777266,0.1897828,0.0017495023,0.0026306545,0.27333254,0.040470283,0.14499019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047928424,0.00008312005,0.3721267,0.00081742986,0.000051231495,0.0005195142,0.48853236,0.0008562148,0.0008628915,0.011406427,0.12453244,0.00016379263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98518765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99705887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076076716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076076716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16635312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55197775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214884191","doi":"","title":"Religious Freedoms Under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Do Religious Freedoms Permit Religious Autonomy?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Autonomy; Multiculturalism; Law; Charter; Cultural rights; Religious freedom; Linguistic rights; Religious discrimination; Minority rights; Religious pluralism; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.006703056904974582,"score_gpt":0.24127526434986135,"score_spread":0.23457220744488677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214884191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20614241,0.006379353,0.0009885153,0.1743184,0.00051725714,0.000092216374,0.0007729102,0.00001897266,0.61077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696101,0.0022762432,0.00044022768,0.00985973,0.000081531296,0.000015010102,0.0001331962,0.000009377346,0.01757458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937635,0.00051060703,0.00009003368,0.0002949623,0.0026050906,0.0027358818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453366,0.0017717029,0.00048701526,0.0002503454,0.0018283925,0.0011288165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035459846,0.00020967948,0.0003140964,0.0013003256,0.017345438,0.0070614247,0.0011821745,0.0026519368,0.00433586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012548589,0.00018900658,0.0003146722,0.0027985398,0.01401802,0.002955586,0.0021901503,0.0055706087,0.00021216192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003400474,0.000031123665,0.011710867,0.00006292852,0.000008262884,0.00033978952,0.01919802,0.00018260967,0.00017546718,0.9046477,0.039575305,0.024033848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075444535,0.000039027356,0.14372528,0.0011046716,0.000076990975,0.0003472006,0.10305952,0.0014980799,0.0008765322,0.14220992,0.60675657,0.00023073284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99508506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07319091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07319091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14172864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5310397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249906295","doi":"10.82308/20400","title":"La compénétration des ordres normatifs : étude des rapports entre les ordres normatifs religieux et étatiques en France et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019444399241169977,"score_gpt":0.28702267994616537,"score_spread":0.2675782807049954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249906295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89650244,0.0072283964,0.005050931,0.008361869,0.00014094521,0.000072536604,0.00040888062,0.00004638041,0.082187615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828928,0.0015732672,0.0011311541,0.00044387468,0.000029040786,0.000024788358,0.00009787563,0.00001615229,0.013791027],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931311,0.0028800147,0.00019424541,0.00066821714,0.0024005868,0.00072576734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840645,0.008805567,0.0016231977,0.00037816874,0.0043753046,0.00075325835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067002955,0.00045991028,0.0005774034,0.0042613233,0.008665321,0.0071747247,0.0015649452,0.0016467402,0.004333205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015634254,0.00032769458,0.00049617974,0.007108356,0.0073301443,0.0027146912,0.0018734944,0.002812855,0.00023158238],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001418542,0.00015428202,0.13914831,0.0004228791,0.00017025134,0.0018411289,0.5137561,0.0027775692,0.0012122769,0.1935086,0.0081638815,0.13870288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032626922,0.000085062944,0.45658416,0.00071170594,0.00006882133,0.00068034884,0.2629612,0.0050067795,0.00079415087,0.00510579,0.26778525,0.00018413283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97746015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97987443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9280962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07190382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044408116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52170116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257067675","doi":"","title":"Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: Re-imagining Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Multiculturalism; Islam; Political science; Sociology; Arbitration; Tribunal; Gender studies; Law; State (computer science); Politics","score_opus":0.01026718193761669,"score_gpt":0.2479797459274932,"score_spread":0.2377125639898765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257067675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39459807,0.046769187,0.022737132,0.21392132,0.0011055756,0.00007079473,0.000046700312,0.00004272114,0.3207085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98983324,0.00405366,0.0010134198,0.002058324,0.00026587202,0.000035237146,0.0000071946565,0.000020695008,0.0027124544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903452,0.0081385095,0.00010153978,0.0003634404,0.00042709993,0.0006241851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935829,0.0053058034,0.00034216561,0.0002873555,0.00019310376,0.00028872045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011642871,0.000606102,0.0006898413,0.0025987495,0.009522036,0.01697884,0.0018326804,0.004511422,0.0018442728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005134713,0.0003148243,0.0004491009,0.0027875605,0.10949135,0.018178675,0.009191913,0.0053726216,0.00013120846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009464373,0.000011050675,0.0006115696,0.000036649446,0.0000043189966,0.00012942158,0.20889968,0.00014805251,0.00007206646,0.7843434,0.0008443046,0.004890045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010168482,0.000030359157,0.001118444,0.00032012173,0.000008318131,0.00017110241,0.35966098,0.0004826743,0.00018301287,0.5656837,0.07231357,0.000017482762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063456045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009874879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01697884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073627234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036455106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06157416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265962699","doi":"","title":"Separation of Sharia from the State as Accommodation - Effects and Limits","year":2013,"lang":"hr","type":"article","venue":"Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Sharia; Accommodation; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Diversity (politics); Space (punctuation); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Islam; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019188735749484216,"score_gpt":0.2722483576757625,"score_spread":0.2530596219262783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265962699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31981066,0.0013395703,0.014932398,0.012404266,0.0002674178,0.00005291922,0.000057082732,0.000049748192,0.6510859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644405,0.00008465521,0.0003666607,0.00024647877,0.000022837567,0.000013276936,0.000006094808,0.000006623787,0.0028093986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955329,0.0020003761,0.00019329002,0.0004811401,0.0008839943,0.00090821885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549544,0.0019791897,0.0005895642,0.0009906241,0.0003983732,0.00054674497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046416633,0.00018318239,0.0005096576,0.0008426716,0.005930127,0.008816345,0.0010013789,0.0017418748,0.0063382066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007475329,0.00027906563,0.00042429086,0.0009778878,0.040445883,0.008848526,0.0110337,0.0038663044,0.0002947019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020995334,0.000014249818,0.0009379711,0.000015641113,0.0000029883945,0.000046072648,0.008158287,0.00014660301,0.00010201417,0.98590904,0.00022472299,0.0044214283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047737092,0.00010868305,0.0071573625,0.0003451097,0.00002526618,0.00020727367,0.03397964,0.0010601502,0.0004859108,0.90195316,0.054580525,0.000049174283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00830837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010511277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008816345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005273139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005621971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038259447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269194084","doi":"","title":"The land of Unlikeness: A post-colonial review of the Anglican covenant","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"St. Mark's Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Ordination; History; Colonialism; Identity (music); Religious studies; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03773791178091053,"score_gpt":0.3646085498903017,"score_spread":0.3268706381093912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269194084","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012183729,0.9992526,0.000007886601,0.0002678722,0.000081288636,0.000002201178,0.000014197182,6.1011576e-7,0.0002515582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00093181996,0.998728,0.00002513234,0.00017730589,0.000055322613,0.0000026341415,0.000015463325,5.117828e-7,0.00006373012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990101,0.000332184,0.00023924833,0.00011976897,0.00024983313,0.000048859954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567455,0.0026049898,0.0006151169,0.00008117968,0.00086964475,0.00015453354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026170847,0.00051680894,0.0015985052,0.005829923,0.00060363516,0.0019272226,0.00084537186,0.0009894171,0.0026040534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050537917,0.0003895292,0.0006515035,0.010675956,0.0012104731,0.0019026108,0.0010481342,0.001375547,0.0005076532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009177899,0.000054427106,0.0010720957,0.16876005,0.00037123906,0.00030242387,0.0017281985,0.00008515078,0.00033822627,0.004964547,0.034986846,0.7872451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013167111,0.00012793936,0.0089904545,0.11067661,0.00072350365,0.0014152105,0.0019497144,0.000029567518,0.00018579986,0.0009394066,0.8749138,0.000034762783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071320506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0203248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071320506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016276063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006135905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0141810775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270080128","doi":"","title":"\"Obligations Concerning the Return of Nationals to a State Party to an Internationally Recognized Armed Conflict\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Armed conflict; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08451678797065643,"score_gpt":0.265028703960899,"score_spread":0.18051191599024258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270080128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08117722,0.0014673949,0.0028385855,0.02439736,0.00044047524,0.00037461452,0.00026453898,0.00007240015,0.88896745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7428109,0.002644404,0.0025198618,0.024474554,0.00025413223,0.00054539094,0.000342471,0.000053722964,0.22635457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98625773,0.0033459316,0.0006063017,0.00060565065,0.0044116625,0.0047727493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931543,0.0036265084,0.0006053797,0.00039806144,0.0015307929,0.0006850522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011395298,0.0005735168,0.00032002907,0.0016721961,0.020562055,0.0067043337,0.0026939423,0.009642605,0.005094087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017545646,0.0004848583,0.00054302544,0.0018744235,0.011977062,0.002816995,0.007316126,0.009251076,0.0007374665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024623176,0.00006097486,0.0039556897,0.00009049126,0.000006618875,0.0026338364,0.035577312,0.00051212014,0.00037782226,0.8964829,0.048637725,0.011639904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057145757,0.000064227424,0.023363905,0.000994817,0.00007674937,0.0024528096,0.08291961,0.00092422107,0.0025764124,0.044755854,0.84162503,0.00018913494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6374322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7624304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6374322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01811282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052539527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.729406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279996450","doi":"","title":"The Identity of Anglicanism: Essentials of Anglican Ecclesiology by Paul Avis (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecclesiology; Identity (music); Philosophy; Theology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.01058580801410783,"score_gpt":0.311292601806551,"score_spread":0.30070679379244314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279996450","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005979807,0.9922168,0.000019908553,0.0062859235,0.0011259078,7.4619453e-7,0.000002227634,6.2323346e-7,0.00028810004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019630159,0.9880856,0.00009293329,0.006849126,0.002280644,0.000005330644,0.0000081470735,0.0000029248959,0.00071226567],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990564,0.00048903783,0.00008559115,0.00009178431,0.00020373498,0.0000734217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760336,0.0016572817,0.0001845427,0.00004089527,0.0003691662,0.00014476277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002754578,0.000580048,0.0012218032,0.0017172922,0.0012844232,0.0034389535,0.0007453439,0.0025292821,0.0020257814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004884664,0.00034580316,0.00024104449,0.0021733772,0.0045636827,0.0044902833,0.0026392594,0.0041326727,0.00067350076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001249851,0.000040989304,0.00051241694,0.010268191,0.000108796674,0.00019814385,0.00453481,0.00007304855,0.0002469031,0.026266664,0.40246928,0.5551558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023079003,0.000033128457,0.0013229027,0.012114991,0.00006300108,0.0006513554,0.0023466717,0.00002009145,0.00008770606,0.004521004,0.9787839,0.000032169366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00939724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018774364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00939724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015147979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003907521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018685102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297473546","doi":"","title":"Arbitration, Religion and Family Law: Private Justice on the Backs of Women","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Private law; Family law; Business; Public law","score_opus":0.018318610557761635,"score_gpt":0.280770204734995,"score_spread":0.26245159417723335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297473546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05350516,0.024608292,0.0021928952,0.4969087,0.0017107774,0.000040862033,0.00011240099,0.000028049883,0.42089275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523488,0.0044862917,0.0005933585,0.028356144,0.0009155191,0.00004253734,0.00002706753,0.00004337648,0.11318692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938257,0.0025712391,0.000116019444,0.00036740993,0.0009900486,0.002129667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943047,0.0032072111,0.00031466165,0.00026929379,0.00079750665,0.0011065396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063437074,0.0002641132,0.00049804145,0.0007152011,0.022546886,0.015899325,0.0012495624,0.011898854,0.012960524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017423755,0.00036529163,0.0002882072,0.001404607,0.033066094,0.007157962,0.0047233454,0.008298793,0.0005965064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017264125,0.000027005259,0.00093913876,0.000019320158,0.0000049011205,0.0001228922,0.015285361,0.00009545232,0.00006129285,0.9104018,0.062377926,0.010647704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041271647,0.000021443695,0.0060658804,0.00049990305,0.000019866078,0.0001607869,0.062191576,0.00050937786,0.00022288051,0.41923127,0.5109806,0.000055052824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50258577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6820697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50258577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01909281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045990195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312699049","doi":"10.7202/1035335ar","title":"Equality, Responsibility, and Culture: A Comment on Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1057056092805917,"score_gpt":0.3572065522453373,"score_spread":0.2515009429647456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312699049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012311888,0.0028389131,0.00022891056,0.98644954,0.0026645402,0.0000043828704,0.000020668704,0.000009272222,0.006552596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03709554,0.0018438249,0.00036270346,0.94719434,0.004761452,0.000055479657,0.00001622182,0.00005346918,0.0086168405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097615,0.003503032,0.0004391836,0.0018491062,0.0021148422,0.0011177143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770508,0.018272124,0.00090795575,0.00075449195,0.0019091422,0.0011055935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011825022,0.0010487215,0.0018296909,0.0009367192,0.014781497,0.008951232,0.006054511,0.051651493,0.0073404703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03169962,0.001084452,0.0014535624,0.0019722306,0.032177895,0.02310908,0.0070923674,0.060286533,0.0018862825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005851168,0.000028409855,0.0003182668,0.000112556736,0.000014755138,0.0003923655,0.01062485,0.00015108555,0.00013934498,0.29724535,0.6847237,0.0061907987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007171679,0.000048035046,0.0013742023,0.0011340906,0.00003072786,0.000452959,0.012226763,0.00059781293,0.0005687212,0.15693577,0.8264061,0.00015312998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04482689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0431259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051651493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007112984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065648346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08913195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320468231","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006554","title":"Emerging Legal Issues Involving Islam in Europe","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Conversation; Political science; Subject (documents); Soviet union; Classics; Law; Theology; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.01271117894001443,"score_gpt":0.29936639385805275,"score_spread":0.2866552149180383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320468231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33733484,0.07334371,0.0011885415,0.19264582,0.0026305013,0.00003499046,0.00013146517,0.00002125345,0.39266884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630516,0.0069003343,0.00033751733,0.016102113,0.0005413118,0.000012198836,0.000043381726,0.000009229986,0.013002317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956862,0.0013330061,0.00023209017,0.0004269119,0.0008140371,0.0015079262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977592,0.0012706878,0.00031713946,0.000117671305,0.00019176814,0.00034352555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034755855,0.0002064961,0.00037452648,0.0016378945,0.0067092795,0.0145508805,0.001179702,0.0108443,0.0041244463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005248943,0.00021737938,0.00035684984,0.002415804,0.013058187,0.004425087,0.005437457,0.004867969,0.00023049132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051017658,0.00003343778,0.0023890503,0.00009072046,0.000016992211,0.0031685245,0.015276097,0.00036987194,0.00028358866,0.9420545,0.018155297,0.018110937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000996681,0.000057937024,0.024886647,0.0012707417,0.000036644313,0.0030452851,0.0579015,0.00055450114,0.0005965348,0.19065963,0.72081256,0.000078339835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017077256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016204765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017077256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009442813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043957806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322037171","doi":"10.1177/0014524612454398c","title":"25 <sup>th</sup> November: Reign of Christ the King","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Expository Times","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reign; Theology; Philosophy; Ancient history; History; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019862611719826312,"score_gpt":0.27652807808754676,"score_spread":0.2566654663677205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322037171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013559811,0.029303173,0.0004553709,0.13522562,0.2045791,0.00015645912,0.0019530104,0.00024997687,0.6145175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059742633,0.0030689016,0.00012914362,0.016165515,0.01682647,0.00009825609,0.00026022675,0.00022157436,0.9034873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998793,0.00029735125,0.00004844054,0.00013394826,0.00032205717,0.00040518792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.0002229503,0.00006546281,0.00007448802,0.00017262655,0.00022980453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013306957,0.0010296582,0.0007835701,0.0010959859,0.013210234,0.009034873,0.0011146718,0.0057703895,0.07026061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004846697,0.00041298248,0.00067059876,0.0009685198,0.003887546,0.0024988973,0.0041728034,0.010827239,0.016500087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018243499,0.000028359953,0.00053853804,0.00016217565,0.000016672082,0.0007528272,0.006661429,0.000054343232,0.00027778276,0.04334943,0.94010586,0.0078702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006427992,0.00001771158,0.0015870413,0.00022920608,0.000005613239,0.00007063119,0.004442776,0.000009185676,0.00014447192,0.00094562717,0.99252933,0.000011983558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028365973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10107849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07026061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052946727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021059096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2350452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327991827","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914000961","title":"Freedom from Past Injustices Nahshon Perez Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; History; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01796452192475687,"score_gpt":0.2612541575890478,"score_spread":0.24328963566429093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327991827","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035853225,0.4982789,0.0011637791,0.101712525,0.003439575,0.000026295085,0.0017816841,0.00017399485,0.3898379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10884843,0.20953985,0.0013134807,0.0059623206,0.0014248765,0.000050525177,0.0012311557,0.00014906305,0.6714803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994043,0.000095348434,0.000052421412,0.00006434369,0.00027191656,0.00011165321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992023,0.00029228255,0.00009999742,0.0001219524,0.00017742513,0.000105962165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011409459,0.0005714303,0.00056839164,0.0008872333,0.0019874186,0.0032974097,0.0007059295,0.0021406473,0.0466001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022837003,0.0006138234,0.00020215547,0.001633799,0.0029731279,0.0037124201,0.0014772213,0.002327676,0.009276086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042419837,0.000019226281,0.00035395747,0.0003819854,0.000009258963,0.0001816152,0.0017975493,0.0001435369,0.00021071512,0.108592845,0.70394737,0.18431942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060319735,0.000006506488,0.0023818,0.0004159326,0.0000032454334,0.00010644884,0.0007428103,0.000021137068,0.00006581455,0.01320284,0.9830368,0.000010562825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033147134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08868106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0466001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002499406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031102055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15589285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336079757","doi":"10.7202/1035668ar","title":"The Protection of Religious Freedom under the European Convention on Human Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Toleration; Freedom of thought; Convention; Political science; International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; Conscience; International law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02673923157394651,"score_gpt":0.2759606894391198,"score_spread":0.24922145786517327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336079757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00536014,0.021776315,0.005728838,0.035590086,0.0024139937,0.00024229137,0.00034220048,0.000104531806,0.92844146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4437939,0.029022813,0.027130146,0.100562066,0.0050154706,0.001387148,0.0010104771,0.00027515198,0.39180282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830052,0.006483965,0.0011128751,0.0017037115,0.0055301976,0.0021639585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968194,0.0014608453,0.0003047266,0.0007176427,0.0004883101,0.00020919998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012206827,0.0007675995,0.001175448,0.0013847168,0.0039356593,0.00946012,0.001720254,0.015154879,0.0073969867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010783896,0.0003501372,0.0010257991,0.0022639418,0.012248189,0.0037739482,0.004783964,0.012371776,0.0035593791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009812692,0.000017263857,0.00011140078,0.00005274787,0.0000054821517,0.00009422256,0.00075225596,0.00011735025,0.00021126309,0.97417146,0.0120460335,0.012410803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000355838,0.000043947668,0.00091007346,0.00061258837,0.000011866171,0.000270998,0.0003352096,0.00017845242,0.00022118023,0.18523186,0.81209683,0.000051286333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020411422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01708414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020411422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054263105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010575986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0645566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338100904","doi":"10.17645/si.v4i2.504","title":"Living Together v. Living Well Together: A Normative Examination of the SAS Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Inclusion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Normative; Sociology; Oppression; Law; Mantra; Sincerity; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01970681895293581,"score_gpt":0.29338187803385096,"score_spread":0.27367505908091516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338100904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14987488,0.0013405007,0.006522701,0.06915741,0.00032895306,0.00017918646,0.0000968471,0.000050319235,0.77244925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96420175,0.00051085855,0.0010372502,0.013773097,0.00019045892,0.00029359,0.000048563754,0.00002885565,0.019915663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847451,0.0077025075,0.00051429396,0.0013640501,0.0030041633,0.002669891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98605484,0.010147928,0.0006058992,0.0005388296,0.001958959,0.0006935317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143421255,0.00056129467,0.0007328637,0.002237921,0.017589996,0.014441872,0.0019428226,0.011960067,0.0044639106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021893222,0.00047850836,0.0010062213,0.002036048,0.033992846,0.00870036,0.0072425595,0.012482474,0.00057806086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006744696,0.000010983907,0.00031643367,0.000006607256,0.0000021176184,0.00025741215,0.0071641216,0.00009731411,0.000058578855,0.9903494,0.0009950255,0.000735334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007329576,0.000082117265,0.0021233938,0.00042982245,0.000035344816,0.0006187354,0.07194257,0.003104497,0.00076393597,0.76902443,0.15169674,0.00010512278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106209844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10769101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106209844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016873287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013106442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21118325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345542358","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0001","title":"The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Opposition (politics); Islam; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Law; Political science; Religious identity; Compulsory arbitration; Epistemology; Negotiation; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.024485303344638817,"score_gpt":0.3369978418985137,"score_spread":0.31251253855387484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345542358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50528634,0.0033565077,0.0014977928,0.16705224,0.0006035138,0.00009692216,0.00029961683,0.000020735777,0.32178634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97894865,0.0006660592,0.00027198225,0.0040774234,0.00008060601,0.000018387793,0.00002869418,0.000012381732,0.015895808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941251,0.0012527292,0.0002348051,0.0005201314,0.0021313867,0.0017357824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832924,0.0080216555,0.0015949111,0.00061866984,0.004669375,0.0018030155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065921694,0.00018710321,0.0003951056,0.0014752588,0.02531901,0.010321297,0.0017069806,0.003821854,0.0062254947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016893588,0.0003187298,0.00023190037,0.0027610995,0.020400176,0.0025825985,0.004006659,0.0035454435,0.00019425576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015738844,0.000057531088,0.025398055,0.00029758696,0.000038360606,0.0017056875,0.31258133,0.00025250134,0.0011153314,0.5994692,0.034146484,0.024780594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006718682,0.000029255725,0.054721955,0.00074488454,0.0000642428,0.00022342552,0.3516572,0.000747091,0.001076761,0.0297851,0.56075007,0.00013281124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98858404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13336974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13336974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08592314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466124574","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511801594.007","title":"Patterns of engagement – political","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03849279922989903,"score_gpt":0.2550254394813766,"score_spread":0.2165326402514776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466124574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78722954,0.0010132948,0.0014616153,0.0022170017,0.000048408576,0.00005190254,0.00037436766,0.00003158751,0.20757227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097484,0.00015751428,0.00021189578,0.00016845025,0.000015369013,0.000022897426,0.00013715678,0.00001925336,0.008292611],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959644,0.001709537,0.00019037181,0.00063244696,0.0007677489,0.00073552364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962136,0.0012311188,0.00092353777,0.00037041045,0.0007240605,0.00053715473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020837628,0.00012126463,0.00017509625,0.0015178967,0.0029856113,0.0057835304,0.00053345837,0.00070875423,0.014710123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005830904,0.0002090975,0.000116961935,0.0028493379,0.0024149558,0.003607298,0.0045136283,0.0013541507,0.0018707553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014794967,0.00015994809,0.21889856,0.00017817109,0.000054293625,0.0004603025,0.5499035,0.00013224877,0.0018162344,0.123628736,0.011471042,0.09314899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011730932,0.00005750871,0.3969682,0.0002285623,0.00000880386,0.0007577794,0.44439256,0.00037517239,0.00038643504,0.016084023,0.14069383,0.000035369863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035472533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00606602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014710123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012838201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068346225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04921031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484722975","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0008","title":"Citizenship and the Challenge of Aboriginal Self‐Government: Is Deep Diversity Desirable?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Government (linguistics); Politics; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Cultural assimilation; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.021604004611305464,"score_gpt":0.25216231471361306,"score_spread":0.2305583101023076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484722975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030744147,0.023295507,0.000985555,0.057060204,0.00058602134,0.000020400308,0.000016324013,0.000018931365,0.887273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6633471,0.017759215,0.0010971865,0.0069524236,0.0003796991,0.000040607792,0.00003612455,0.000036567075,0.310351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994087,0.00022258842,0.000007037879,0.000030802963,0.00016895164,0.00016197175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999696,0.00010732016,0.000015698884,0.00002203307,0.000067222354,0.00009175737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007600684,0.00015008979,0.00017813248,0.00040637143,0.0056351232,0.0048964783,0.0005675674,0.0010914011,0.0017524526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066298107,0.00009017361,0.00012181955,0.0007637161,0.014686884,0.0018888391,0.0017085277,0.0022997612,0.00026001607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004843025,0.000010529828,0.0003073076,0.000034335335,0.000002063435,0.000119240605,0.032487053,0.00011931773,0.00009543752,0.9257643,0.023915857,0.017139858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047297467,0.000013611613,0.0019188442,0.00027930015,0.0000048586217,0.00012740289,0.04078485,0.00020154443,0.00016908848,0.1669643,0.7895207,0.000010836631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2758404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4631692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2758404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0125612095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015599668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54846966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517982792","doi":"10.1086/343021","title":"Book ReviewsMargaret Moore, . <i>The Ethics of Nationalism</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. 260. $45.00 (cloth).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Nationalism; Download; Media studies; Section (typography); Sociology; History; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06908773803624252,"score_gpt":0.33420642310245724,"score_spread":0.2651186850662147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517982792","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023456685,0.8414712,0.00058588944,0.02382691,0.010449276,0.00003873918,0.0008945449,0.000105553976,0.122393295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002471409,0.66284657,0.00086460746,0.010296071,0.008266655,0.000070398986,0.001265831,0.00015909763,0.31375927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951375,0.00007502413,0.000034409568,0.000054917884,0.00028304715,0.00003880137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812883,0.00080550776,0.0001396593,0.00005905049,0.0007220976,0.00014481111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057463493,0.0012003644,0.0009853551,0.0032078868,0.0010108603,0.002387692,0.0013178776,0.0016793758,0.08974973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00296386,0.0005363362,0.00047017008,0.0045197043,0.0007576524,0.0029090468,0.00078124023,0.0023252955,0.04454044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006453119,0.000007725966,0.000027849905,0.00039596687,0.0000030485576,0.00002192037,0.000059314676,0.000029655937,0.000028583661,0.002635278,0.9601931,0.036591172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022624183,0.000004546614,0.00023881071,0.0006304438,0.000003078189,0.00011658789,0.000049748385,0.000011884357,0.000023621797,0.0014529359,0.99746144,0.000004716985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011651237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032329246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08974973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020412703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021877058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30024272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521091882","doi":"","title":"On Collective Constitutional Rights: Lessons for Religious Rights from Language Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Individualism; Law; Autonomy; Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Rights of Nature; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Right to property; Human rights","score_opus":0.011442832389271783,"score_gpt":0.2960408376415442,"score_spread":0.2845980052522724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521091882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031258777,0.010745827,0.02336435,0.36372468,0.0007776364,0.00004550612,0.00017806259,0.000056156125,0.569849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93795466,0.006397813,0.0052418807,0.022479694,0.0012537872,0.00006331217,0.00009939953,0.000074777396,0.026434723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564147,0.0012146514,0.00008825521,0.00047970438,0.0011920272,0.0013838181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99180275,0.004460954,0.0003894063,0.00093696994,0.0013249192,0.0010849779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008626474,0.000588799,0.0009296551,0.00180597,0.011476093,0.009584411,0.0023602445,0.0069441437,0.008840116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010491131,0.00031574772,0.0007138028,0.0016926902,0.10879728,0.013587001,0.0066640433,0.010573062,0.000689719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021841004,0.0000037686295,0.00009223621,0.000009155381,0.0000012981218,0.000028477389,0.0014740787,0.00009219312,0.0000136921935,0.99555534,0.0012314739,0.0014961166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000877151,0.0000037064056,0.00040521158,0.00010200512,0.000002738432,0.000019837607,0.0018054924,0.0001522441,0.00004427848,0.9612096,0.036236912,0.000009129629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4254248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44349122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4254248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028353406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028882662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84589714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551934934","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000986","title":"Toleration or Latitude? Two Models for Liberal Politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Impartiality; Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0565158228639713,"score_gpt":0.35356846542373266,"score_spread":0.2970526425597614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551934934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115413174,0.0016777124,0.050059266,0.045862116,0.0003528491,0.000062430234,0.00016512883,0.00015975039,0.7862475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992485,0.00021650257,0.0013714131,0.0007703315,0.00016410205,0.000028995197,0.00002400096,0.000026063854,0.0049136365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462825,0.0031684937,0.00010498885,0.0005515558,0.0007717521,0.0007750483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157274,0.0047521354,0.0009502588,0.0010580072,0.0005870317,0.0010799132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046902113,0.00037362246,0.0006303642,0.002046577,0.003472898,0.008951807,0.0012238923,0.0032323354,0.015365874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00994135,0.00024746612,0.000855786,0.0014803319,0.02842871,0.009387285,0.0061614774,0.0038625377,0.0015648544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000778021,0.000006441015,0.00016580212,0.000005607419,0.0000012231068,0.000014740692,0.00059875194,0.00015845636,0.000012562892,0.99808526,0.00023653089,0.0007068872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011937072,0.0000064898936,0.0002596907,0.000017063781,0.000002418908,0.000027886064,0.0008181149,0.0008017374,0.00001782968,0.9932134,0.0048172097,0.000006132314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020832205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016755037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015365874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038144395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018139457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05140394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556221961","doi":"10.1515/icl-2015-0104","title":"The Place of the Niqab in the Courtroom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Law; Witness; Accommodation; Charter; Citizenship; Political science; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Freedom of religion; Psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.04297987057629569,"score_gpt":0.332259574693555,"score_spread":0.2892797041172593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556221961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27417332,0.0019623712,0.008246415,0.042353615,0.0006520239,0.000074323376,0.000109559725,0.000059950704,0.67236835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869033,0.00015020772,0.00037250784,0.0014558994,0.000037640675,0.000008398322,0.0000100389825,0.000013500956,0.01104848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98810834,0.0042175082,0.00026979402,0.0011598867,0.002829892,0.00341462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292773,0.0031762517,0.00045612265,0.00040981802,0.0014616478,0.0015683868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058172424,0.00017133825,0.0004249012,0.0018290691,0.034815565,0.017845228,0.0020720717,0.004725973,0.012840625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014068944,0.00048583746,0.00034317287,0.0015740119,0.033036307,0.0046960916,0.008019088,0.0076814224,0.000844335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003506549,0.000028750545,0.0034638909,0.000033944267,0.000009322068,0.0016083628,0.06012902,0.00024442695,0.00073171814,0.91365576,0.009343857,0.010715893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040234616,0.00008138584,0.02068079,0.001134083,0.00005075274,0.0009188246,0.27396467,0.0015926514,0.002000103,0.17914921,0.5201675,0.00021979082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48207787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64070666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48207787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02890259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029819487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560223691","doi":"10.1400/238464","title":"Gli accomodamenti ragionevoli in materia di libertà religiosa tra giurisprudenza della Corte europea e della Corte canadese","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Duty; Jurisprudence; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Impartiality; Pluralism (philosophy); Supreme court; Public sphere; Relation (database); State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Sociology; Political science; Constitutional court; Identity (music); Human rights; Constitution; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02132801349354167,"score_gpt":0.2785450020323171,"score_spread":0.2572169885387754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560223691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17538552,0.029143337,0.004318424,0.045954432,0.000512369,0.000096898875,0.00016449104,0.00008063602,0.7443439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8864535,0.004888584,0.002795877,0.0033197696,0.00012408172,0.000032892905,0.000056185152,0.00003112943,0.10229805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977235,0.00059249345,0.00004258272,0.00018904882,0.0007233097,0.0007290696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932504,0.00021497613,0.00008180034,0.00011420258,0.0001421792,0.00012180161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020047943,0.0002063723,0.00017956323,0.0009634308,0.0039880634,0.004908253,0.00046476675,0.0015570602,0.006194977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025406785,0.00014527807,0.00018108024,0.0013426131,0.005240731,0.0011193926,0.0027634073,0.0030411123,0.0005394051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034143573,0.00003314713,0.0046724463,0.00010138534,0.000012911745,0.0003155535,0.013502024,0.00027477957,0.0010121763,0.9068117,0.011115686,0.06211396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003263192,0.00006939978,0.036860116,0.00044573675,0.000029821847,0.00033291444,0.009940915,0.00037664152,0.0009994899,0.066482246,0.8843822,0.000047970938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13448146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31903806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86551857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072219996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00716937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2673974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581876056","doi":"","title":"Book Review: HASSAN MAHAMDALLIE (Ed.). Defending Multiculturalism: A Guide for the Movement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Multiculturalism; Sociology; Political science; History; Aesthetics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.22184270658559574,"score_gpt":0.4506123742871046,"score_spread":0.22876966770150886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581876056","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010145102,0.93694896,0.0003706047,0.016738798,0.017588478,0.00007669531,0.00040386827,0.00010040889,0.027670769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010700875,0.85757655,0.0008154484,0.009853287,0.008549393,0.00017854007,0.0008761354,0.000092230286,0.12098836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876416,0.00020851952,0.000094013194,0.00013619495,0.00072333176,0.000073770905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965132,0.00094950426,0.00031678058,0.00006876363,0.0018387461,0.00031304787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013856388,0.0017133851,0.0023200556,0.0036210367,0.0009234753,0.0033083905,0.0018685155,0.002481592,0.06495629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054647373,0.0007026443,0.0007639479,0.0053210184,0.0008419248,0.003935043,0.0014261887,0.0037406606,0.06459436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008767138,0.000006293792,0.00002210645,0.0008933603,0.0000060120424,0.000024849192,0.00004590656,0.000020788351,0.000041877563,0.00036185322,0.9330067,0.0655615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060590114,0.000010950869,0.00016243458,0.0019103903,0.000008921982,0.00017291665,0.00005838233,0.000012768356,0.000025589308,0.00036797635,0.99725515,0.000008526651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008127372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014122692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06495629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021112252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005577986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21730047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587867489","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1271","title":"In the (Canadian) Shadow of Islamic Law: Translating Mahr as a Bargaining Endowment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Canadian Bar Association; McGill University","keywords":"Islam; Shadow (psychology); Multiculturalism; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Ideology; Negotiation; Sharia; Law and economics; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Institution; Endowment; Narrative; Political science; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018030406697897006,"score_gpt":0.2828372173223689,"score_spread":0.26480681062447187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587867489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07856637,0.0009797704,0.016716808,0.01295761,0.00014652731,0.000053262203,0.000056753528,0.00003344989,0.8904894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817215,0.00047451307,0.004123093,0.0007532264,0.000044706907,0.000024558276,0.000012724539,0.000022569837,0.012823185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521977,0.0012980971,0.00007609829,0.00044338198,0.0019158358,0.0010468661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975067,0.00090089015,0.00023707288,0.00034150312,0.00066545955,0.00034842105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048370473,0.00037321917,0.00040908693,0.0021574476,0.014527979,0.0108417375,0.0017546462,0.0022373782,0.0071389116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008271876,0.00032072575,0.0002743482,0.0028094517,0.063230395,0.0063336496,0.006201289,0.0031099764,0.0004246807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053459403,0.000003514788,0.00023701979,0.000005177052,0.0000010201699,0.00003850597,0.0042310227,0.00025558434,0.00005550748,0.99201876,0.00031001423,0.0028383902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001820983,0.00002833777,0.0032683632,0.000118821954,0.000013857379,0.00010269542,0.029190712,0.0023712618,0.00029556442,0.87517554,0.08936318,0.00005344337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7062401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7882656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29375988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048050016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037154224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59097975},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2605556373","doi":"10.1017/s1740355315000108","title":"The Ethics of the Empty Church: Anglicanism’s Need for a Theology of Architecture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anglican Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Quarter (Canadian coin); Closing (real estate); Institution; Theology; Work (physics); Sociology; Religious studies; Political science; History; Law; Philosophy; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.13433034035157768,"score_gpt":0.4093706305743623,"score_spread":0.27504029022278464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605556373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52009964,0.018132975,0.010357017,0.19242303,0.0012473298,0.000034050554,0.000021858836,0.000028129549,0.25765604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944458,0.0005531169,0.000431608,0.0017496728,0.000115144256,0.0000075249427,0.0000018835319,0.0000068354834,0.0026883984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923868,0.006530078,0.00010875084,0.00017126785,0.00042312825,0.00037993264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908439,0.0064160153,0.0005718384,0.00057773665,0.00079233065,0.00079825945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009765793,0.00016947667,0.00038120797,0.0007799612,0.008094542,0.006629889,0.00065721414,0.0020188545,0.0019283445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007256224,0.00023544295,0.00011011549,0.00048722487,0.055581983,0.004742579,0.0030116832,0.0045317197,0.00022501544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021109887,0.000019094596,0.00069285574,0.000050294704,0.0000018903289,0.00012776062,0.17535922,0.00006135759,0.00013111708,0.8154845,0.0033105023,0.0047403304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002884173,0.00007246282,0.003099244,0.0007207865,0.000008330225,0.00041387003,0.29997337,0.0006463572,0.0003569107,0.4645195,0.23012488,0.00003542813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058077388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007048941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009765793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031922145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026551373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051647067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615927180","doi":"","title":"Tackling prejudice and engaging with religious minorities : how cities can make a difference with an intercultural cities approach.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Durham Research Online (Durham University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Islamophobia; Human rights; Political science; Context (archaeology); Convention; Population; Sociology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Politics; Law; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.05149511755780831,"score_gpt":0.29471803900082677,"score_spread":0.24322292144301846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615927180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40302145,0.01437351,0.005568584,0.3497176,0.005010266,0.0005716623,0.00019939078,0.00025377682,0.2212838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009206,0.006872525,0.007002612,0.027083185,0.00039151034,0.0004885011,0.0001580019,0.0001731648,0.0569098],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938659,0.0043912237,0.00008652644,0.00016766375,0.00047214716,0.0010165466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948054,0.0012765003,0.00041337239,0.0004061362,0.00039855196,0.0026999246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061607705,0.0005472815,0.0003420917,0.0007635011,0.019967219,0.011531443,0.0028162368,0.0033466076,0.012653554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057367,0.00045269114,0.00073782925,0.00088849507,0.008883283,0.008813192,0.02064058,0.0068557574,0.0017529107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017306073,0.0010325175,0.019769637,0.00113898,0.00008413884,0.0021198748,0.6205419,0.00046283824,0.0016429678,0.077731036,0.10297245,0.1723306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027566202,0.00019845982,0.015358015,0.0007403832,0.000028544722,0.00018633531,0.5954352,0.00024263476,0.0005721961,0.01104482,0.376116,0.000049791855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017621493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08026247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019967219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061242147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118464315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044434488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W262563095","doi":"","title":"Anglican and Episcopal Readings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Convention; Protestantism; Law; Synod; Church history; Theology; History; Sociology; Classics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01451824280908277,"score_gpt":0.3275030756231495,"score_spread":0.31298483281406675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W262563095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008126209,0.022645438,0.00048630728,0.013541344,0.0075814184,0.00002400402,0.00018605626,0.000045738983,0.9473635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28635255,0.025384778,0.0009056229,0.015113434,0.016924072,0.00013085731,0.000542539,0.00032099494,0.65432507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839205,0.00083180564,0.00006413572,0.00015600825,0.0003183036,0.00023770706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998099,0.00064714224,0.00016038009,0.00013162571,0.0006354375,0.00032636386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012431366,0.00049517263,0.0003751651,0.0022042675,0.0066483705,0.007690078,0.0007424081,0.0011781753,0.037271272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039335703,0.00022741708,0.00015960832,0.0025120643,0.00431376,0.0027554072,0.0018754285,0.003016654,0.0054553924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005210306,0.00007825445,0.0011687306,0.00043159563,0.0000055843248,0.000429519,0.07444393,0.000044026823,0.00036960258,0.39653918,0.48113716,0.045300286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020729847,0.00000935918,0.001219034,0.00039614015,0.0000018574551,0.000087185705,0.012732484,0.000025984908,0.00005068643,0.004084329,0.98138636,0.0000044371873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012043183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016984155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037271272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004286502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024246583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12468481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269282748","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0020","title":"Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial, and Religious Expression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Denial; Sexual orientation; Freedom of expression; Punishment (psychology); Immigration; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02924679277733437,"score_gpt":0.3004910290392545,"score_spread":0.2712442362619201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W269282748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03065942,0.010731808,0.0025698151,0.008902906,0.0006120447,0.000019634332,0.00001972726,0.000015723128,0.94646895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84178954,0.0057692146,0.00077387766,0.0033179405,0.00046355146,0.000035108107,0.000030767846,0.000025611598,0.14779453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993463,0.0003192861,0.000015548501,0.00006328359,0.00018818722,0.00006721993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995895,0.00026646105,0.000037216876,0.000035699115,0.000038993654,0.000032178956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066746713,0.00018595305,0.00020252433,0.0003411389,0.0016472028,0.0023791997,0.0003809776,0.0011809595,0.0071342625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010338145,0.00008936033,0.00012776612,0.00023039554,0.012151113,0.0021129549,0.0018924555,0.002245926,0.0005998868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004394404,0.000013449082,0.00006531362,0.00002698909,8.1885554e-7,0.000069403504,0.006557104,0.00003545298,0.00011956371,0.9787017,0.004072208,0.010333586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001575369,0.00004285055,0.0016473678,0.0005271212,0.000006556233,0.0006200212,0.011323442,0.00033789466,0.00093297125,0.48763028,0.4969007,0.00001496669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013204174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017936417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071342625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014524728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000983679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023866475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730428860","doi":"","title":"A Destruction of Muslim Identity: Ontario's Decision to Stop Shari'a-based Arbitration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Identity (music); Islam; Law; Business; Political science; Theology; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.018163909956121736,"score_gpt":0.3205209524441682,"score_spread":0.30235704248804646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730428860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3240064,0.0011659911,0.0010996484,0.30071408,0.0015716519,0.00026474815,0.00023548915,0.00008355215,0.37085846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6643185,0.00061536074,0.0010416199,0.07740482,0.00037869212,0.00009786317,0.000053983877,0.000070218346,0.25601885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949602,0.00045636445,0.00014912208,0.00026482972,0.0015216878,0.0026477594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472356,0.0017487542,0.00023723397,0.00018991064,0.0014314491,0.0016690422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004232578,0.0002783779,0.00035998604,0.00061571767,0.045575876,0.007854473,0.0022129158,0.015335411,0.00810984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007211655,0.00073749817,0.0006630285,0.0007183498,0.007242954,0.001394095,0.0030245304,0.012376917,0.0006782946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063080766,0.0002643995,0.038914207,0.0001967315,0.00017384,0.008245801,0.067375414,0.001473028,0.0056229653,0.31907907,0.5157678,0.04225587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023620321,0.00010037881,0.041924745,0.00019402477,0.00015891225,0.0006277979,0.04099953,0.0013543833,0.0020846722,0.0131422905,0.8989529,0.00022420971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9620856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99343467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07227391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07227391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13250726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5243864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751457090","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n4p60","title":"Human Rights and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Law; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Sociology; Liberalism; Political philosophy","score_opus":0.03672037188946901,"score_gpt":0.3512015154988274,"score_spread":0.31448114360935836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751457090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51087004,0.032386903,0.0014846775,0.16261065,0.00072455144,0.000046999317,0.000014432743,0.000011126275,0.29185054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655047,0.005216353,0.00027570632,0.012088642,0.00017984441,0.000017062917,0.0000037103598,0.000006247916,0.016707642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954573,0.0026567364,0.00010355065,0.00024833097,0.00079450145,0.0007396174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962643,0.0022042838,0.0003863952,0.00011597562,0.00042246334,0.00060673535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051837116,0.00012630572,0.00034610063,0.0010519966,0.015707454,0.0063491026,0.00086514227,0.0070878225,0.0033495112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008460727,0.00035580646,0.0002550198,0.001210095,0.01981438,0.0037561024,0.005532058,0.0062738643,0.00020072455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028286635,0.00009661126,0.0028154668,0.0001621688,0.000011574134,0.0012241423,0.12447899,0.00027055945,0.0007763758,0.83786976,0.005165799,0.027100349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004758494,0.00023405584,0.05610557,0.0014742829,0.000041787942,0.0011760367,0.16426599,0.0018880999,0.0010385674,0.27856383,0.4950582,0.00010597823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10496734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16797937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10496734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01335084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20871276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756108888","doi":"10.1177/0191453709358834","title":"Faith in law?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Separation of church and state; Citizenship; Obligation; Faith; Sociology; Realm; Politics; State (computer science); Secular state; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02785350278673347,"score_gpt":0.3378942874117365,"score_spread":0.310040784625003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756108888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012684046,0.0106963385,0.005347437,0.2563915,0.0027419615,0.000027923323,0.000035199388,0.00006131837,0.7120143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8032198,0.003809881,0.0015653251,0.059621263,0.0015968569,0.000054475222,0.000041115978,0.000060746068,0.1300306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961611,0.0017476293,0.000089390545,0.0005150457,0.00094472064,0.0005421296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963085,0.0017902399,0.00028012597,0.00058039074,0.0005498853,0.00049081043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045108204,0.00022627228,0.0003142231,0.00066663657,0.007955395,0.0073046894,0.0010031383,0.005021555,0.01482077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009976098,0.00014334636,0.00020701358,0.0005162811,0.03445193,0.007802001,0.004208788,0.007826964,0.0021649625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032470168,0.000009192693,0.00014609138,0.0000110077335,9.862645e-7,0.000039634662,0.0049119447,0.00002121703,0.00003078786,0.97117966,0.015259235,0.008387066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007770644,0.000018935436,0.00042923618,0.00026657054,0.0000022197376,0.00015711441,0.009724427,0.00012931215,0.000090123125,0.4535621,0.53560364,0.00000855526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006276338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006359902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01482077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040958095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003632373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049580455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766467779","doi":"10.1163/15718115-02404005","title":"Legal Pluralism and Reasonable Accommodation of Religious Diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Accommodation; Normative; Reasonable accommodation; Diversity (politics); Political science; Arbitration; Sociology; Religious freedom; International law; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019799898089918482,"score_gpt":0.3042422611656729,"score_spread":0.2844423630757544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766467779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25887984,0.0038286624,0.06010663,0.11344927,0.00069559785,0.00016168621,0.00006967773,0.000079179845,0.56272954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911282,0.00021425275,0.0029380985,0.0023359424,0.00020694957,0.000046030236,0.000014701809,0.000012285122,0.003103351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661924,0.019080043,0.0017961921,0.003405784,0.005609775,0.003915819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98025024,0.008308309,0.0024816343,0.0042264136,0.0019772213,0.0027562003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031734865,0.00029602202,0.0011534189,0.001959455,0.0131652085,0.011586408,0.0025214313,0.008430048,0.0030761284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029987087,0.00044728452,0.0011174781,0.001248264,0.081552684,0.010133879,0.02262205,0.008659458,0.00034853214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065673357,0.000014773294,0.0002763461,0.000014680361,0.000005021349,0.00007880664,0.0041164905,0.0001157444,0.000117034295,0.9931427,0.0002592558,0.0018525578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022982484,0.000026944228,0.0005459623,0.00008244327,0.0000055604464,0.0001407742,0.0029072624,0.00024801373,0.000095364194,0.98256654,0.013340428,0.00001760034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052088886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061243717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031734865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00560203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008531346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16783202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769746738","doi":"10.2174/9781681085937117020005","title":"The Case-Law Concept of Reasonable Accommodation: The European Court of Human Rights Facing the Governance of Cultural and Religious Diversity in the Public Space","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Current and future developments in law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; Human rights; Religious diversity; Political science; Law; Public space; Space (punctuation); Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04968149226689107,"score_gpt":0.30342910722498645,"score_spread":0.2537476149580954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769746738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00876384,0.015649226,0.017539281,0.025286233,0.0013037316,0.00006311018,0.00004111564,0.000027448486,0.93132603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77760684,0.010740094,0.0131105445,0.017194442,0.002091316,0.00025048602,0.00013946088,0.00010056684,0.1787663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523586,0.002160633,0.00018379967,0.0004775227,0.0013441123,0.0005981188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987815,0.0006894141,0.00008352296,0.00013020005,0.00022264889,0.000092760856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053547863,0.00035623022,0.00045959672,0.0010430565,0.0040069027,0.008711742,0.0015080278,0.006103402,0.00373752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057718693,0.00022492533,0.0005029519,0.0015135573,0.02011867,0.006454906,0.0034914382,0.006054402,0.0006939006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.882983e-7,0.0000029101107,0.000018350835,0.0000065140166,4.7377802e-7,0.000022106917,0.00040184543,0.000040984323,0.000011494277,0.9961791,0.0016817343,0.001633498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006519623,0.000009906542,0.00020331625,0.00027043326,0.0000045086995,0.00013447409,0.0011314953,0.00033742332,0.00010164975,0.765843,0.2319436,0.000013701557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010057713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009996776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010057713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007426232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006175983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053881347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780089108","doi":"10.13130/1971-8543/9161","title":"Challenges of Pluralistic Societies with Dissimilar Cultural Identities and Religious Legal Traditions: ADR and the Role of Religious Mediation and Arbitration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Riviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Religious law; Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Religious pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Islam; Mediation; Legal realism; Comparative law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.017833979175324317,"score_gpt":0.25555701256523145,"score_spread":0.23772303338990713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780089108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20750356,0.03128688,0.0044341623,0.39612845,0.0010264373,0.000073072784,0.000052947056,0.00004229729,0.35945207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787715,0.0026896482,0.0009960548,0.007430154,0.00050022296,0.000028840688,0.000016789,0.000010657925,0.009556055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819386,0.010907145,0.0006405266,0.001244535,0.0027081554,0.00256099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285586,0.009256155,0.0020407205,0.0009829788,0.002078816,0.002785507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01910621,0.0002669888,0.000548594,0.0011909793,0.013680062,0.016815498,0.0017589377,0.005427857,0.007542832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015973244,0.00029451624,0.00046998257,0.001178841,0.02838656,0.008351801,0.013088531,0.0072957394,0.0006852334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028579017,0.00009562174,0.0031915144,0.00020446925,0.00001683291,0.0012204243,0.042338904,0.0005214893,0.00019046039,0.9038931,0.010168432,0.038130205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045011067,0.0001200065,0.0063468036,0.0009687854,0.000020567513,0.0019411838,0.14497058,0.0011375621,0.00031024186,0.57476234,0.26930803,0.00006896686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048828796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006261363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01910621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00741053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010239919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101044476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788678691","doi":"","title":"The Religion Clauses of the New Zealand Bill of Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.01682139988986197,"score_gpt":0.2859575613368566,"score_spread":0.26913616144699465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788678691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037701856,0.0025344244,0.0016200744,0.05732513,0.0010977172,0.00035752464,0.00081617123,0.00006524492,0.8984819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4253157,0.0037585376,0.0060700863,0.073761016,0.0007153169,0.00056689826,0.00120439,0.00010568538,0.48850238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867823,0.000851322,0.0006586774,0.00065791653,0.009057053,0.0019927684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993529,0.0017711153,0.0009773512,0.0005783318,0.002191446,0.00095271715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065164026,0.00034436482,0.00043913114,0.0011179236,0.0048326585,0.0048473575,0.0012398922,0.0058284444,0.011215503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018456908,0.000522186,0.00065820076,0.0010995378,0.005059386,0.0020527334,0.0029900572,0.006661304,0.0020740319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101158956,0.00009898426,0.006074973,0.00012910904,0.000019710908,0.0004905404,0.004871665,0.00021921404,0.0022577462,0.74202996,0.19266482,0.051042043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008808628,0.00005886857,0.037307527,0.00030974334,0.000029470059,0.00031951972,0.0014182532,0.00027735546,0.000677717,0.027620925,0.9318028,0.00008982277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5207028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6883061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5207028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013181722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032113504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794379701","doi":"10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp55-70","title":"Freedom of religion versus freedom of business management in Spain: Spanish Case-law analyzed in the light of “reasonable accommodation” figure according to Canadian Case-law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Law; Duty; Common law; Obligation; Judgement; Reasonable accommodation; Labour law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03418002145604547,"score_gpt":0.3125540892297254,"score_spread":0.2783740677736799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794379701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43553814,0.0116417175,0.002287026,0.021782186,0.00025037615,0.00021362404,0.00049722276,0.00003488426,0.5277549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98047286,0.0023163718,0.00079658785,0.0021690675,0.00006203834,0.000042594846,0.00017747024,0.000017946864,0.013944965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995522,0.0010135997,0.00015660623,0.0003298082,0.0012042891,0.0017736512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945927,0.0023197362,0.00045589232,0.00040946872,0.0017710612,0.00045101438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00676979,0.00024782406,0.0006310795,0.002453589,0.0054217624,0.00738317,0.001382118,0.0030963125,0.0039684363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011611899,0.00017877124,0.00058509613,0.0034623146,0.008317434,0.0015989245,0.0024848222,0.0028416365,0.0002177586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010659887,0.00012058608,0.015798857,0.00016485307,0.000026795258,0.00149141,0.009945683,0.0012197011,0.00025842985,0.94283897,0.014471236,0.013556901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022005253,0.00012947316,0.102433205,0.0026938487,0.0002343658,0.0019209245,0.082327135,0.00787166,0.0009848757,0.20473504,0.5961509,0.00029853426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69529665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6371991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30470335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034814525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026069812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6129956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386265","doi":"10.1017/lst.2017.11","title":"Autonomy and prenuptial agreements in Ireland: a relational analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Irish; Commission; Common law; Law; Equity (law); Injustice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04825470394405566,"score_gpt":0.3693254662490878,"score_spread":0.3210707623050321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796386265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.583334,0.0007636345,0.008252493,0.007583646,0.000060611215,0.0002045381,0.00015894722,0.000022284821,0.3996198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672854,0.00013242185,0.0004449176,0.00013895518,0.000008682106,0.000024609659,0.000028158396,0.000006985662,0.0024867726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845035,0.008021011,0.0005531415,0.00088172115,0.0028804294,0.0031601796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98303753,0.008931259,0.0032659234,0.0011703542,0.0023774356,0.0012175448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122668715,0.000204481,0.00033179953,0.0027261595,0.0061336923,0.011079436,0.0023409664,0.0013488226,0.009280377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022510694,0.00025776078,0.0006267901,0.0032962365,0.019016622,0.007431348,0.0106071215,0.0027371426,0.00045718867],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053412063,0.00007463179,0.022842664,0.000104800376,0.000021941747,0.0005547941,0.13283807,0.0009122855,0.00013041287,0.8292751,0.0012740213,0.01191785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042289932,0.00009600571,0.056974098,0.00070725766,0.00006756262,0.00048146493,0.6373721,0.0045611584,0.00035808384,0.19989668,0.09935907,0.00008432573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0832618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06122801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0832618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02880583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01452041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2090019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798079748","doi":"10.4337/9781784719692.00005","title":"International and comparative perspectives on diversity management: an overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.10825308030533445,"score_gpt":0.3245990219933776,"score_spread":0.21634594168804314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798079748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002159072,0.33579126,0.0013658105,0.011218572,0.0024573419,0.000015191127,0.000061155595,0.00001819642,0.64691335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11262388,0.6841134,0.0034824754,0.008129207,0.008007246,0.00014084589,0.0003250773,0.0000933194,0.18308458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921405,0.00035540565,0.00003870194,0.00007417493,0.00019142752,0.00012627128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994711,0.0003091338,0.00004222931,0.000036548092,0.00006486449,0.00007624137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010295038,0.00064949394,0.00042653445,0.004600078,0.0033894805,0.0058536087,0.0008330962,0.0017243293,0.017701177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009962745,0.00017525093,0.00033111032,0.010158101,0.0046979575,0.005209672,0.003256148,0.002827914,0.0021581315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123189375,0.000057190482,0.00022026124,0.0007219808,0.000006258182,0.00012606822,0.0059807925,0.00019986277,0.000126531,0.8295005,0.069970615,0.093077645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014362369,0.000010607315,0.00040991095,0.0009399416,0.0000020338637,0.00017685958,0.0025112913,0.00003773927,0.0000345187,0.0348253,0.9610465,0.0000038020232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002655953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004316651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017701177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004008172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002234508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05921632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806703425","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.8292","title":"Multiculturalism in Canada: Individual vs. Collective Rights  ","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Pretext; Human rights; Immigration; Law; Minority rights; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.1052147601157256,"score_gpt":0.36807412524702193,"score_spread":0.2628593651312963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806703425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2471699,0.013146786,0.0011733375,0.101345316,0.00065509253,0.0000799687,0.00020411941,0.000032579435,0.6361929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666312,0.00407885,0.00041952074,0.0037894882,0.00005594132,0.00001552177,0.000042348678,0.000017322905,0.02494996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935098,0.00073103653,0.000094962954,0.00037411062,0.0024112419,0.002878788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565876,0.0008880312,0.00030070986,0.00017212954,0.0012056073,0.0017748061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024819379,0.00031553194,0.0004417104,0.0016299745,0.033141505,0.009596586,0.0012996751,0.0024161555,0.0076360567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049852068,0.0002368472,0.00039398586,0.0036045138,0.025181089,0.0027257344,0.0054916334,0.0038398288,0.00021732486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048844835,0.000054620832,0.01840586,0.00032085858,0.000039095285,0.0009013939,0.17630701,0.000482155,0.0005193645,0.70704716,0.03382236,0.062051263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035944417,0.000048906462,0.08708367,0.0012456712,0.00006850499,0.00043137645,0.35770425,0.00059518905,0.00046968763,0.044179436,0.5079778,0.0001596469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12399559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12399559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19328707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89965516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809263102","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n10.5","title":"REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION BASED ON RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR PRACTICES. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN, CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN APPROACHES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14268369864834157,"score_gpt":0.3728837980788236,"score_spread":0.23020009943048203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809263102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1819883,0.017000591,0.0029223745,0.03679611,0.00038309858,0.00006238627,0.00015430401,0.000025942287,0.76066697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849498,0.0028302022,0.000533996,0.002652395,0.000039400893,0.000015260777,0.000031217136,0.000008336689,0.008939234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900922,0.0027442994,0.00025594502,0.000512672,0.0032162531,0.0031784826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944729,0.0016169843,0.0005921305,0.00031716115,0.0019146866,0.0010860775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052958275,0.00025763572,0.00026609754,0.003978232,0.014804229,0.008551585,0.0015469387,0.0031105338,0.002875429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009252212,0.00017720852,0.0004901441,0.004180451,0.039577343,0.0026640184,0.0039436813,0.0035744486,0.00016658685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018050849,0.00002294913,0.0027725731,0.000041070787,0.0000067928722,0.00018155843,0.032272696,0.00017886776,0.000105307176,0.9469856,0.0029140885,0.014500537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029547493,0.00008243683,0.08785867,0.0019906953,0.00008517257,0.00058529794,0.26554206,0.0010276154,0.00069244386,0.15397157,0.48791423,0.0002202067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9073839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09261608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06299999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05987969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45709908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904991890","doi":"10.4324/9781315270661-8","title":"The challenging parallelism of rights claims based on religious identity and on sexual identity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallelism (grammar); Identity (music); Religious identity; Sexual identity; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Computer science; Human sexuality; Philosophy; Parallel computing; Aesthetics; Religiosity","score_opus":0.04046017338645062,"score_gpt":0.3239360623274196,"score_spread":0.283475888940969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904991890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031166125,0.0042596683,0.004282166,0.057045773,0.00046230803,0.000034716944,0.00003452367,0.00001662219,0.90269816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138222,0.003319524,0.0020371992,0.0087443385,0.00038395508,0.00005027006,0.00003181239,0.000032941953,0.0715778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520737,0.0015369315,0.00008321264,0.00029620074,0.0019008893,0.0009753827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.0011639205,0.00008218052,0.00012111534,0.0002420433,0.00023221469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004551166,0.00030573402,0.0004962802,0.0014195525,0.012189079,0.011290027,0.0017139603,0.005055108,0.004683487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046164426,0.0002801057,0.0004380959,0.0014841929,0.09006499,0.0086970255,0.0054202196,0.010058411,0.00034032017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.334186e-7,0.000001433822,0.000025674843,0.0000031467298,2.547579e-7,0.000016919843,0.0040905485,0.000012458906,0.000016811802,0.9944886,0.00041262028,0.0009305355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010080112,0.000010142917,0.00083428825,0.00018248905,0.0000049573123,0.00008997922,0.020539185,0.0002774943,0.00020647228,0.8784878,0.09933841,0.000018730017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30233586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4660109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30233586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032002375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033081647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6011521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945750318","doi":"10.1108/s1059-433720190000079006","title":"Religious Accommodation in the Secular State: The Sharia Debates in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in law, politics, and society","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secular state; Sharia; Neutrality; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Multiculturalism; Common law; Sociology; Islam; Geography; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06463093567756763,"score_gpt":0.3369315178786218,"score_spread":0.2723005822010542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945750318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70893764,0.017113183,0.0003638058,0.106723085,0.0005304203,0.00004704615,0.000075175805,0.00001791962,0.16619183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98291105,0.002179895,0.00013208902,0.006577925,0.000042568787,0.000007689507,0.000009345407,0.000008408232,0.008130996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551183,0.0010489573,0.00012536436,0.00022458154,0.0012002307,0.001888996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067044,0.0029867191,0.0005819264,0.00018601693,0.0029387502,0.0026361286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052060676,0.00018013996,0.0004330115,0.0016130466,0.02935118,0.011098396,0.0017295,0.0040834285,0.0036067737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071339887,0.00026234062,0.00024503705,0.0026818118,0.023454947,0.0022924305,0.004844674,0.00533388,0.00013800764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013811217,0.00010696846,0.015615876,0.00033820374,0.000038493334,0.0024252671,0.40738672,0.0006926197,0.00080629485,0.509359,0.02276461,0.040327877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053270163,0.00004600012,0.06663623,0.0014102332,0.00004915557,0.00033719,0.47174057,0.0008926456,0.0005725064,0.018544009,0.4395616,0.00015653626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14251013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14251013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13199034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972761749","doi":"10.5040/9781509911400","title":"Religion, Equality and Employment in Europe","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing Ltd eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Labour economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05163308555306596,"score_gpt":0.3113290036416802,"score_spread":0.25969591808861425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972761749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00669242,0.07583502,0.00047360672,0.009075718,0.0016752899,0.000011812361,0.000021688806,0.000018145853,0.90619636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2901963,0.06387117,0.0011529818,0.010318614,0.0022085386,0.000061759674,0.000086770284,0.00006241562,0.63204145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995105,0.00017831015,0.000015163893,0.000040007817,0.00016301089,0.000092969254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999881,0.000044397377,0.000012923195,0.0000140218435,0.000018258046,0.000029395853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000498026,0.00029191392,0.00028879746,0.0006229363,0.0028893875,0.004376035,0.0003521298,0.001236833,0.0069017657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081487,0.00011895698,0.0001915456,0.0012716885,0.0041927802,0.0024153476,0.00235023,0.0019084339,0.0012085929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014416452,0.000050193656,0.00032096347,0.000086921114,0.0000047699364,0.00013168491,0.0071182316,0.0002134703,0.00011945079,0.8094727,0.087221965,0.09524529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004778496,0.000014108655,0.0010870624,0.00030606857,0.0000022241281,0.00012512165,0.001985317,0.000058311183,0.000049398423,0.08189424,0.9144683,0.000005110002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044323974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055915103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069017657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002048431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015397562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023088753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974262435","doi":"10.7202/1064487ar","title":"Entre Luxembourg et Strasbourg : modalités juridiques et diffractions européennes dans la gouvernance du religieux","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013443781517067974,"score_gpt":0.29111037191699934,"score_spread":0.27766659039993136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974262435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90103704,0.006522842,0.0007870042,0.011800742,0.000074183314,0.000015821224,0.00028939403,0.000019529803,0.07945335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921125,0.0009324189,0.00015341917,0.00036480426,0.000018409643,0.000009029955,0.00008174953,0.000010201607,0.006317413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988821,0.00048680295,0.000020773694,0.00014674688,0.000115459996,0.00034805702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999141,0.00036228626,0.00019849793,0.00007928027,0.00012281076,0.000096125375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001854255,0.00023974606,0.00025949994,0.002201336,0.0033013206,0.005473761,0.00064954866,0.00070755236,0.008710322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024622958,0.00021794927,0.00018421827,0.004781,0.009724081,0.0026160954,0.0030033763,0.001327842,0.0006647092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020564636,0.000042783562,0.06767494,0.00021552724,0.0000651637,0.00082480453,0.42089027,0.00040155312,0.00096904795,0.43985093,0.004408047,0.06445128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008716154,0.00009253529,0.39131278,0.0009131216,0.00006394621,0.00033805193,0.35999012,0.00033955034,0.0004337834,0.033418283,0.212946,0.000064665495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27127457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33286056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27127457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011214398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039127287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53939116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982294728","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.74","title":"A Tale of Two (Diverse) Countries: Religious Diversity in Canada and Singapore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Political science; Religious freedom; Religious diversity; Charter; Sociology; Liberalism; Ethnic group; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Human rights; Ethnology; Economic freedom; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012225705339405405,"score_gpt":0.26701008077356947,"score_spread":0.25478437543416405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982294728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135483,0.0022572733,0.00022155598,0.022375295,0.00013255424,0.000031029133,0.00034423143,0.000010007269,0.061079774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930708,0.00062728446,0.00011068249,0.0011007307,0.0000061742326,0.0000055769965,0.000056785306,0.000005465598,0.005016544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831223,0.00033166303,0.00003066161,0.00011352279,0.00032906164,0.00088284793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976496,0.00030444888,0.00017040226,0.00005795467,0.0006671073,0.0011504935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010973624,0.0002402055,0.0003815226,0.001935284,0.026796289,0.0058607496,0.0010169452,0.0012545629,0.0043711867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021609068,0.00015371006,0.00025329593,0.0046274597,0.008220237,0.0014460048,0.005240621,0.0024525297,0.00014538171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017677496,0.00014001426,0.14866926,0.00022120593,0.00007741743,0.0071860068,0.57710475,0.0008566528,0.0012389059,0.15967345,0.04118429,0.06347126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010708285,0.000026555355,0.07555442,0.0002431866,0.000028575914,0.00031128852,0.8245243,0.00030347132,0.00026808705,0.0029260663,0.09571781,0.000085558386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99147683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073151484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073151484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06930321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5307536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982351217","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.77","title":"Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Political science; Secularism; State (computer science); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01665888651955795,"score_gpt":0.29817363911422906,"score_spread":0.2815147525946711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982351217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25827423,0.004106385,0.0043726256,0.15639484,0.0013010345,0.00004094747,0.0000631979,0.00002093334,0.57542574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98943824,0.0005279026,0.00013301944,0.0042403787,0.00014101723,0.000009936085,0.000008363569,0.00000658132,0.0054944777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952148,0.0029585995,0.00010029781,0.00021970367,0.0007303748,0.00077626086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967353,0.0019102304,0.00032241503,0.00021516813,0.00031043394,0.00050648325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004244263,0.00012164799,0.00022751187,0.00069495523,0.00482286,0.0066204555,0.0005392054,0.0026332715,0.0053877328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047884495,0.000096344564,0.00020124062,0.0008536092,0.01676662,0.0039722077,0.0061603123,0.0039001098,0.00023055355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017614497,0.000025158317,0.0009914011,0.000032818203,0.0000047362723,0.000100712474,0.040053267,0.0000823775,0.0001886962,0.94676524,0.0045674113,0.0071706125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031028394,0.00008172711,0.015499225,0.00050313695,0.000019710287,0.00015162646,0.19449666,0.0006791653,0.00065744796,0.49120498,0.29661918,0.000056166948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069432002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01753696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069432002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006376905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025881552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046267927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004595240","doi":"10.4000/theoremes.3393","title":"Frontières de la liberté religieuse et exemptions individuelles","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Théorèmes","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010145923006379816,"score_gpt":0.3093641981176664,"score_spread":0.29921827511128657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004595240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26300162,0.010865847,0.012705565,0.041913483,0.00043846486,0.00007449934,0.0002528617,0.000040764768,0.6707068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768183,0.002041032,0.0020575286,0.0021637056,0.00012935197,0.0000636789,0.00006168493,0.000018978173,0.016645676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966827,0.0018002096,0.00007011106,0.00028777952,0.00072692183,0.0004322646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669564,0.0017209918,0.00049232296,0.0004066465,0.00041580023,0.000268491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003356952,0.00033974132,0.00034027474,0.0011723846,0.0042822673,0.0054340977,0.0006186842,0.0013527296,0.009513625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057683955,0.00016066006,0.00029926377,0.0015959091,0.017966218,0.0031980053,0.0037149978,0.0037618093,0.00061226886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023209905,0.000014708803,0.00243485,0.000050568386,0.000007535914,0.00006200769,0.020473476,0.00009908801,0.00010129427,0.9641677,0.0010624729,0.011503217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005397611,0.00009859566,0.038474176,0.0011634127,0.000039847608,0.0003144324,0.07796609,0.00070838333,0.00074852345,0.5897521,0.2906218,0.000058751266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021965805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03045494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021965805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046335324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057708714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0436759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07395497734515308,"score_gpt":0.32980345894477453,"score_spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008191152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030210648,0.00407016,0.034413997,0.06185543,0.002165029,0.00027070646,0.00029462887,0.00017150184,0.8665479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609038,0.0013549916,0.013617292,0.039964102,0.0013497566,0.0005201143,0.00020475837,0.00011897375,0.08196618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867887,0.0043241507,0.0013345156,0.0020430777,0.0028765986,0.0026328985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917509,0.0024079925,0.0008659823,0.0017711958,0.0021658945,0.0010380605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008508072,0.0004786288,0.0005946598,0.0007935347,0.007791219,0.006347809,0.0016717949,0.010504554,0.008755116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021708714,0.00033023648,0.0013555172,0.0005406914,0.019321335,0.007439012,0.007720495,0.009318465,0.0019579718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007774572,0.000012071271,0.0002809248,0.000023015664,0.0000031490874,0.000079550366,0.0013112857,0.00007099628,0.00009015733,0.99119097,0.004068359,0.0028617696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027717373,0.000081828504,0.0020771525,0.00038446384,0.000022356615,0.0005190497,0.002201972,0.00053314463,0.00039877312,0.66980404,0.32386607,0.00008337903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018018888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0171246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005231767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009066456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044995546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03512001175155976,"score_gpt":0.2922466806274343,"score_spread":0.25712666887587454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121641526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052903425,0.018864166,0.006254135,0.93832755,0.0026252898,0.000024746105,0.000023902361,0.0000302546,0.028559625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47323087,0.025933983,0.0130009195,0.44212386,0.018308628,0.00023777969,0.000030739375,0.00021699385,0.02691624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857465,0.010343175,0.00036691272,0.0011539642,0.001597603,0.00079199875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825951,0.0140417125,0.00048099906,0.0009723006,0.0013804452,0.00052944775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017947963,0.0005870764,0.0008442079,0.001578486,0.0124609545,0.010830309,0.004102019,0.01707688,0.002025984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027328333,0.00048046318,0.0010881025,0.0011481844,0.059589043,0.024010073,0.0072764982,0.020260852,0.00068861886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001797061,0.00001598804,0.00031043307,0.000066240464,0.000010497639,0.0004238535,0.025921466,0.00020308088,0.00007669474,0.9239921,0.0407808,0.008180965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003847679,0.000030025858,0.0003929764,0.00051151944,0.000008963429,0.00046347053,0.012670787,0.00058535865,0.00017531183,0.70682997,0.2782354,0.00005776293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02055742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020775447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02055742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006097426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050019356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094919026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121682222","doi":"","title":"Are Muslims the New Catholics? Europe’s Headscarf Laws in Comparative Historical Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Immigration; Political science; Population; Secularism; Sociology; Referendum; Politics","score_opus":0.14085115607918847,"score_gpt":0.3737837721688877,"score_spread":0.23293261608969923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121682222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35307705,0.086315006,0.00039656129,0.026256323,0.0007231456,0.000011689458,0.00014676085,0.000009248744,0.53306425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755883,0.012691014,0.00011319276,0.0016086148,0.00044014174,0.0000043829864,0.000041874533,0.00000770005,0.0095047355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992836,0.0003442749,0.000020899468,0.000099648365,0.000058118832,0.00019348091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992306,0.00042199425,0.0001430544,0.000043692882,0.000055202327,0.00010544821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016187439,0.00018206151,0.0001887296,0.0014848765,0.003779388,0.005152801,0.00037299577,0.0016183987,0.006159956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011470065,0.00015820192,0.00009793472,0.002523418,0.010707185,0.003225724,0.0015287895,0.0018133793,0.0002358867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037386326,0.000033281845,0.004262234,0.00012918121,0.000011315579,0.0005372581,0.12757063,0.00005992012,0.0001837044,0.83823436,0.0077515272,0.021189101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007613962,0.000051433013,0.037880316,0.0009471082,0.000010401844,0.0006472155,0.1273201,0.00007355272,0.00017867662,0.018732017,0.81413054,0.000020995756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011182691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014335682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011182691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002977928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065460993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022235215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121980120","doi":"","title":"Dilemmas of Civil Tribunals in Formulating Their Positions Towards Religious Tribunals – The Case of Custody of Muslim Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Multiculturalism; Supreme court; Position (finance); Scope (computer science); Immigration; State (computer science); Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law; Economics","score_opus":0.018058702016493778,"score_gpt":0.31610987743466795,"score_spread":0.29805117541817416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121980120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42447594,0.0034282277,0.010020837,0.24184605,0.0014842654,0.0002851597,0.00003194306,0.000031994678,0.3183956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96993935,0.00060557347,0.0024442903,0.017358886,0.00040606296,0.0000987633,0.0000062790373,0.000019183057,0.0091216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9675676,0.019795347,0.0010480807,0.0016456335,0.003201831,0.0067415233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98255044,0.011213796,0.0014347384,0.0006331093,0.0017876531,0.0023802994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040583644,0.00048413672,0.00070441037,0.0012160311,0.035319973,0.015843011,0.0034376613,0.02308007,0.0059086657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04070724,0.00081806566,0.0009887632,0.0010895545,0.039843243,0.0072294096,0.010932661,0.021959681,0.0005658085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042621883,0.000070423484,0.0021202536,0.000050810027,0.000031872183,0.0069041625,0.06016787,0.00053647714,0.0004866214,0.9158751,0.007182199,0.0065316353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002337781,0.00024477104,0.0055170613,0.0009661505,0.00010976716,0.0063578757,0.29682106,0.0029218153,0.0018243113,0.47815773,0.20656067,0.00028492458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028936066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041772667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040583644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011288478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012233667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21462935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793050","doi":"","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Framing (construction); Arbitration; Law; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.01674414092716521,"score_gpt":0.2733536071429327,"score_spread":0.2566094662157675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123793050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044034388,0.0069126245,0.00463571,0.5203103,0.004966726,0.00004435932,0.000087134315,0.000059312526,0.41894943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346446,0.0022463168,0.001542069,0.079978086,0.0026234717,0.000042710446,0.00004175692,0.00007848052,0.07880254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850684,0.004387144,0.0003813493,0.0010237175,0.0055915504,0.0035479707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354714,0.0029694622,0.00032460326,0.00033642686,0.002119505,0.00070288073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017814532,0.0003680926,0.0006152191,0.0011344969,0.017830258,0.009931087,0.0026767359,0.012148526,0.0059684706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016362062,0.00037592908,0.0005954181,0.00107167,0.023229405,0.004259442,0.005144963,0.012556396,0.0005879603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029829373,0.000010542447,0.000554647,0.000051229454,0.000008313455,0.00016964565,0.019247701,0.0001534168,0.00021086946,0.9222632,0.04850354,0.0087971445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004483694,0.000016827584,0.0017215965,0.0003082878,0.000026048112,0.00008205401,0.00980009,0.0005833522,0.00044659435,0.10366268,0.8832612,0.0000463161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48413327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68366194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48413327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049583763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043215863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9626306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124062011","doi":"","title":"Equality in Sheep's Clothing: The Implications of Anti-Discrimination Norms for Religious Autonomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Clothing; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.0599814106725551,"score_gpt":0.36631858864637024,"score_spread":0.30633717797381516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124062011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4480558,0.001119344,0.006790111,0.06144943,0.00018793286,0.000039996812,0.00003661008,0.000016958133,0.48230377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591666,0.00007996357,0.00036897915,0.0011430491,0.000023726574,0.000008581427,0.000002777058,0.000003731189,0.0024526159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406624,0.0026902736,0.0001953282,0.00046062743,0.0017176551,0.00086991006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915047,0.005003128,0.00071726466,0.00077787315,0.0010877294,0.0009093161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069407346,0.00010879374,0.00022165783,0.0005239517,0.007162558,0.0049203276,0.00095576653,0.0027413354,0.002576641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014230913,0.00014342593,0.00018580223,0.00038966478,0.052771125,0.0038272822,0.003435042,0.003468516,0.00014820458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012720785,0.000021381707,0.0021035776,0.000013886115,0.0000018158875,0.0001771613,0.026960194,0.00006142802,0.00032269396,0.9644486,0.00068126805,0.0051953048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053227603,0.000101608806,0.024834126,0.0003516818,0.000014886075,0.0005860833,0.097741224,0.0010011233,0.0013292138,0.76670134,0.107229084,0.000056498666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048584893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08723239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048584893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055405716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005273246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09660417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145748135","doi":"","title":"权利的边界：宗教自由vs. 同性恋平权——从奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案谈起 (Rights in Conflict: Religious Freedom versus LGBT Rights)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Religious freedom; State (computer science); Balance (ability); Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.014337526460151667,"score_gpt":0.2851071456227762,"score_spread":0.27076961916262454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145748135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09467234,0.0063426797,0.008157632,0.10381742,0.0006496285,0.00011077844,0.000448734,0.0000667576,0.785734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571127,0.0027553013,0.00259798,0.003932812,0.00025013735,0.000121841185,0.00010168665,0.000031747124,0.03309586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720985,0.0014390411,0.00011058208,0.00040763183,0.0004561361,0.00037674193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647266,0.0017655083,0.00040829697,0.00018504723,0.00069763337,0.00047083606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039548944,0.0003417947,0.00029158962,0.0016138938,0.0059289215,0.009397214,0.00083099236,0.001994928,0.015883964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071739736,0.00022152407,0.0003851235,0.00197768,0.017652126,0.010790022,0.0028853074,0.0030657127,0.0011997827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016844873,0.000022130409,0.0020752081,0.00009189699,0.000008967634,0.00009028246,0.022337051,0.00018838765,0.0001102726,0.9538323,0.00871753,0.01250911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041566393,0.00004689003,0.008710514,0.00064245984,0.000025762685,0.0001491773,0.08369733,0.00089030183,0.00062233367,0.6941361,0.21098629,0.000051288356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025600566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02439522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025600566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008716912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009691423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06324589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146571481","doi":"","title":"Il metodo e l’uso degli strumenti religiosi di ADR negli ordinamenti statali","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Quaderni di diritto e política ecclesiastica","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Political science; Hostility; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.042210766171458365,"score_gpt":0.3029997649661019,"score_spread":0.26078899879464357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146571481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3410273,0.035702404,0.23261386,0.048198357,0.0014812198,0.0010260168,0.0046371254,0.00059884024,0.33471483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85611093,0.00951202,0.11751506,0.0019383322,0.0005360141,0.00047876968,0.00066899735,0.0001477814,0.013092095],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233454,0.0046272264,0.0003688079,0.0009320292,0.0014922674,0.00024506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918395,0.0033254887,0.0013443751,0.0021590278,0.001123171,0.0002084409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00983695,0.00040290502,0.0004770451,0.0022060983,0.0008891984,0.0057813977,0.00083757594,0.00072228274,0.0071849218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016511908,0.00026296615,0.0003472023,0.0033635644,0.0025456387,0.0035035352,0.0024353699,0.0015139934,0.0011689906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017608445,0.00021733379,0.08478562,0.0013254266,0.00013610527,0.00025376517,0.011861961,0.0012341451,0.0029351886,0.29209018,0.011251712,0.59373254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015531188,0.0005900787,0.09179235,0.003159773,0.00029056813,0.0018564631,0.018136045,0.005325475,0.0066240015,0.16361402,0.70825565,0.00020028818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044543897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006573052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00983695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018196979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002514283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05202341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188745354","doi":"10.14288/1.0397499","title":"The Law of 1905 in Question : Legislative Compromise and the Role of Moderate Catholics in Pacifying the Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Law; Political science; Legislature","score_opus":0.008346671152526141,"score_gpt":0.20950075908854546,"score_spread":0.20115408793601933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188745354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3234189,0.005342723,0.0006221093,0.12792796,0.0010397458,0.000075003176,0.000112989386,0.000015575955,0.541445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523081,0.0005911952,0.00021693898,0.020139577,0.00023563846,0.00003257999,0.000019991407,0.000013126147,0.02644276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203837,0.0029879066,0.00021135667,0.00062862586,0.00078449555,0.0033492148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653506,0.0018972589,0.00030526498,0.000108875574,0.0004551485,0.00069842197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008448319,0.00024478367,0.00044691397,0.0010731468,0.019823814,0.007919889,0.0014824381,0.010842351,0.004540205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014585066,0.00031599947,0.00032343742,0.0012737085,0.020694707,0.002636334,0.0037878228,0.01266127,0.00033242864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075354306,0.000059427337,0.0025504474,0.00003601495,0.000010684008,0.0002734205,0.04836446,0.00010666167,0.0002254387,0.92209107,0.018320916,0.00788614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013785608,0.00015727377,0.04694096,0.0008778638,0.00010322541,0.00027888888,0.11031668,0.000570231,0.0014135066,0.099010006,0.74004495,0.00014856736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32209298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46769494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32209298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024104705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02351612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6404364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207405667","doi":"","title":"Pluralismo y Multiculturalidad: Tribunal Arbitral Musulmán y Consejos Islámicos ('Sharia Courts') en el Reino Unido (Pluralism and Multiculturality, Muslim Arbitration Tribunal and Sharia Courts in the United Kingdom)","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Arbitration; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.025356518616590478,"score_gpt":0.326613611962779,"score_spread":0.3012570933461885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207405667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99342513,0.00043303502,0.000055699576,0.0006238434,0.000008469436,0.000007522799,0.000009459815,8.5110736e-7,0.005435933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988167,0.000093987845,0.000019430829,0.00007405167,0.0000034071466,0.0000028665177,0.0000049359273,7.602168e-7,0.000983745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968485,0.0012922906,0.00016112124,0.00029181826,0.00049031974,0.000915879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99397695,0.0018441133,0.0020084763,0.00025357044,0.00072788197,0.0011889936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00370915,0.000116805226,0.00034385617,0.0011608287,0.0066704666,0.005205579,0.0006558013,0.0009368218,0.0049546035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051822495,0.00023737983,0.00015880936,0.001863903,0.0061969976,0.0017020247,0.006182343,0.0015164085,0.00020701872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016249476,0.00016996304,0.35502872,0.00014665905,0.000040476392,0.0021766142,0.57207197,0.00016579643,0.00083221716,0.035009928,0.0020728617,0.032122344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017694541,0.00006607796,0.4212941,0.00016850539,0.000017782879,0.00040410622,0.5574809,0.0002274774,0.00021381471,0.0012497461,0.018836407,0.000023394823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18734339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39565375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18734339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076835165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054099755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37250584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W323909182","doi":"","title":"The Changeless, the Changeable, and the Changing: Thoughts on the Future of Anglicanism(s)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Worship; Gospel; Diversity (politics); Globe; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Law; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02281746230808459,"score_gpt":0.29430677177576975,"score_spread":0.2714893094676852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W323909182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06747914,0.18181603,0.0015813088,0.5209427,0.016497916,0.00005599018,0.000053107036,0.00007497411,0.2114989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7946717,0.056278877,0.0016272024,0.071383856,0.007688509,0.00014051562,0.0000481801,0.000070898284,0.06809037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964934,0.0025725695,0.000047537014,0.00021074768,0.00021959688,0.00045614975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815625,0.00081371894,0.00014772851,0.000049734215,0.00024794103,0.0005845426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00503351,0.00061251665,0.00048368765,0.0011512887,0.025102362,0.017435923,0.0014117816,0.0057414803,0.0029012081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022224626,0.0004462175,0.0004385068,0.0009264555,0.0318112,0.013068817,0.0037073377,0.009307387,0.00070987025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003886458,0.000083851155,0.0011352106,0.00027997122,0.000006731377,0.000969881,0.4489784,0.00006886577,0.00023800769,0.43658054,0.093037724,0.018581923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007547441,0.00005207888,0.0011567044,0.0008490738,0.0000065500676,0.0005263775,0.57950234,0.00014400257,0.00010245492,0.041071687,0.37654436,0.000036777627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015180542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023950065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025102362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073556867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058405255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053369522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334241474","doi":"","title":"Islam in Catalonia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Quarterly","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Catalan; Immigration; Islam; Arabic; Emigration; Ancient history; History; Political science; Capital (architecture); Ethnology; Economic history; Geography; Humanities; Law; Archaeology; Art","score_opus":0.023333462087865183,"score_gpt":0.26786227852362854,"score_spread":0.24452881643576335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334241474","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018040784,0.67893064,0.00009831623,0.047477577,0.035100114,0.00005497271,0.00035886082,0.000039279657,0.21989952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29133728,0.2833156,0.00051751384,0.05875786,0.021347001,0.00011933495,0.00081016467,0.00009871483,0.34369653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931884,0.00018495032,0.00005248521,0.000095880896,0.00016211047,0.00018570201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966335,0.000058577145,0.000052475523,0.000021825437,0.00012552882,0.00007834901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000979717,0.0008480953,0.00049609767,0.0012914828,0.002568861,0.0054657483,0.00065274216,0.0022791256,0.00964874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008068613,0.00023494847,0.00044920345,0.0011237502,0.0018299635,0.0007965736,0.0028466878,0.0018418552,0.0024524098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021134637,0.00007934284,0.0016778171,0.0019846477,0.000054035438,0.0021064822,0.0071243607,0.00045902492,0.00094990607,0.07158818,0.74840283,0.16536197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019557989,0.000013879792,0.003972941,0.00042093443,0.0000076196184,0.00023474994,0.0015940471,0.000016402313,0.000040758387,0.00063154014,0.99303985,0.000007626394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.111543305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081002936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111543305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008190435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060165366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22178811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343313169","doi":"","title":"Postcolonial Anglicanism: One Global Identity or Many Contextual Identities?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Bishops; Ecclesiology; Identity (music); Sociology; Publishing; History; Religious studies; Classics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08602599552791201,"score_gpt":0.37624609979677137,"score_spread":0.29022010426885936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343313169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09660824,0.33025315,0.0021257547,0.09603352,0.0043611913,0.00005496551,0.0001423242,0.000057911762,0.470363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8504071,0.060937442,0.0008586205,0.007408008,0.0015747045,0.000067781344,0.0001014687,0.00005899063,0.07858587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984401,0.0008257698,0.00003761694,0.00013745646,0.00023354117,0.00032557064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883395,0.00035392705,0.00015300477,0.00014094939,0.0002645239,0.00025358188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013029396,0.00047913505,0.00062413857,0.0011614935,0.00558361,0.013545479,0.0007545897,0.0014515317,0.0046282527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016292506,0.00022716138,0.00014524288,0.002834653,0.027643973,0.0077363136,0.0031081454,0.0035934013,0.0008971961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037075177,0.000045049692,0.0025593403,0.0003426437,0.000014745532,0.00057488447,0.32561588,0.00004037662,0.00021478884,0.5521927,0.048914604,0.06944803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000789318,0.000046456185,0.008181121,0.0013389024,0.0000111509935,0.00030187008,0.21569869,0.00004969953,0.00018447239,0.059263784,0.7148943,0.00002164866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012816145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024439426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013545479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005348441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052870186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038805842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37124968","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2023.01.002","title":"Where did all the women go? Representation of women and men in the Standing Comittees of the European Parliament","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CJC Open","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03481015929442325,"score_gpt":0.31970249619670854,"score_spread":0.28489233690228527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37124968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61014336,0.009338286,0.0008633493,0.26833168,0.004202313,0.00007526442,0.0007935862,0.000042867574,0.106209286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521742,0.002027545,0.00018972791,0.024229495,0.00041252852,0.0000407407,0.00013288819,0.000029532886,0.020763487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969477,0.0011065701,0.00013980916,0.00014005028,0.00036765946,0.0012982271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975452,0.00044795976,0.00040570495,0.00007775529,0.00031334668,0.0012100325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030724634,0.000121322344,0.00029343323,0.00049158034,0.0026280917,0.0021235452,0.00029330404,0.0013106738,0.009565067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054543763,0.00018466443,0.0002123303,0.0006921158,0.0010134373,0.0014718643,0.0016500289,0.0019670967,0.000934361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012192894,0.00033406884,0.22678626,0.00057934516,0.00014924361,0.003619896,0.094486654,0.00018406926,0.007864306,0.098967135,0.26809263,0.29771715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007176272,0.00020510002,0.25660768,0.00077142956,0.00003105212,0.0018094726,0.090295136,0.0003013783,0.00078425667,0.0051865224,0.64385265,0.00008370842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011752295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015972434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011752295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014124769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016756768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031998277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W381326460","doi":"","title":"To Make Room for the Spirit to Work: Reflections from Lambeth Conferences on Theological Education","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Archbishop; Ecclesiology; Spirituality; Theology; Law; Political science; History; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17730161519804388,"score_gpt":0.4258623109013206,"score_spread":0.2485606957032767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W381326460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23353201,0.02362546,0.0017195749,0.63994247,0.01424007,0.00016892537,0.000065227905,0.00008794618,0.0866183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80787677,0.0073681464,0.00088619604,0.13043043,0.0051416154,0.00022571385,0.000041962357,0.00037251276,0.04765652],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95401675,0.03379893,0.00062806736,0.0012025152,0.0036613087,0.006692361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96411306,0.021039985,0.0017766342,0.0009732135,0.0028813072,0.009215752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03205782,0.0008666129,0.0011672681,0.002076062,0.050903745,0.02534973,0.004909436,0.018491052,0.0053949486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05538048,0.0011315887,0.0009451488,0.0021078275,0.034069553,0.0135833705,0.02338933,0.04238513,0.0012334108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006553298,0.00013877724,0.0005785055,0.00020848078,0.000011212055,0.0017004219,0.9384285,0.000055677665,0.00044141733,0.022185657,0.027304413,0.0088814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111970385,0.000038045593,0.0006962047,0.0003682392,0.0000037303405,0.00024704204,0.81884974,0.00003773203,0.00020460006,0.0026568226,0.17684826,0.00003837962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019737955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030175762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050903745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013155474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012677937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16953999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214739763","doi":"10.1080/09637494.2021.2010906","title":"Religious anti-discrimination legislation and the negotiation of difference in Victoria, Australia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion State & Society","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Legislation; Negotiation; Etiquette; Sociology; Constructive; Covert; Power (physics); Law; Tribunal; Political science; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.022626020965367755,"score_gpt":0.2973799517109,"score_spread":0.2747539307455322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214739763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85161906,0.002380915,0.0010380631,0.020523919,0.00015102526,0.00006797602,0.000014969279,0.000009223871,0.12419476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909836,0.00033410257,0.0002668337,0.00084395567,0.000009143259,0.000013672838,0.0000036312433,0.0000030238089,0.0075421073],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930508,0.0040967544,0.00017322629,0.00027247952,0.0011561825,0.0012505999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996218,0.0011804701,0.0007086628,0.000121802645,0.00052075967,0.0012503387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041681933,0.00010152968,0.00021207516,0.0006813308,0.015346581,0.0035024697,0.00087376806,0.0016666387,0.002429142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007417699,0.00031145263,0.00016348124,0.00082974613,0.012507732,0.0017479938,0.006184054,0.003066497,0.00014965505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045931673,0.00012988203,0.012144797,0.00018150361,0.000012031172,0.0012235027,0.6804765,0.00031544451,0.001917202,0.25587684,0.0034101997,0.044266175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035610068,0.00023923111,0.14624782,0.00072459655,0.000022109423,0.0008504471,0.42129612,0.0014300465,0.00073255115,0.05349685,0.37479848,0.00012614671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41634673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6271541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41634673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024047384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025854591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82784665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233248001","doi":"10.1080/14742250208574006","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Rowan; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06375113010546707,"score_gpt":0.36360474544892407,"score_spread":0.299853615343457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233248001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039748047,0.08819916,0.0014322834,0.012615308,0.025625478,0.00018385745,0.0040438557,0.0010232861,0.8664792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001851107,0.040718786,0.0010795579,0.005521954,0.0053293533,0.00010044527,0.0034636983,0.0005400964,0.941395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986117,0.00015402958,0.000095467185,0.00026276207,0.00075145415,0.0001246203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979144,0.0003827164,0.000114758484,0.000229026,0.0010177152,0.00034141474],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071447523,0.0011149256,0.0012588421,0.003458322,0.0015165558,0.008414498,0.002578611,0.0026370764,0.587859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045326017,0.00051476224,0.000836137,0.0048660296,0.00079198234,0.004753002,0.0027260869,0.0026902643,0.5590199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012319632,0.000017161205,0.000044062333,0.00041916937,0.0000037203788,0.000061759805,0.000067810724,0.000039277704,0.000108592554,0.004200113,0.8957987,0.09922729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017739036,0.0000030179724,0.00004931946,0.00017444676,0.0000013056676,0.000063302985,0.000034342676,0.0000063928132,0.000015180463,0.00054396933,0.9991047,0.0000023064204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037626638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006109147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41214103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022187636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040403507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58786917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237439551","doi":"10.5539/res.v11n1p203","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Review of European Studies, Vol 11, No. 1","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; George (robot); Classics; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; History; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.08180596522111333,"score_gpt":0.39458429952743185,"score_spread":0.3127783343063185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237439551","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016027335,0.015095416,0.003212362,0.1526881,0.8152386,0.0034193378,0.0014341658,0.00064171373,0.008110003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011252384,0.033910997,0.018442228,0.2529239,0.5562759,0.034212545,0.004443959,0.0040196558,0.0845184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.78945726,0.077106096,0.053272273,0.012391044,0.06274116,0.005032184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1386019,0.06685493,0.03270183,0.020966059,0.7306786,0.010196639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16747747,0.0039123567,0.007195815,0.024178216,0.0064928443,0.017588044,0.0070826965,0.013207284,0.09886038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67582476,0.0019319005,0.004663314,0.0145549085,0.0049372073,0.014106582,0.007925725,0.012466514,0.054008316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036844533,0.0000056251247,0.00009976679,0.0019030398,0.000023274662,0.000046894038,0.00027971243,0.000009954957,0.000043257834,0.00068203657,0.98277885,0.01409071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007795061,0.000020246009,0.00045388262,0.011470102,0.000058488644,0.00023019743,0.0006617596,0.00007731303,0.00007356486,0.0017490942,0.98506886,0.0000586433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030563578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043274877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16747747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012107655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0287251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88571614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239035810","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u7032","title":"Bedford-Jones, Rt Rev. Michael Hugh Harold, (29 Sept. 1942–18 April 2021), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto, 1994–2008 (Area Bishop of York Scarborough, 1994–2006, of Trent-Durham, 2006–08)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History; Art history","score_opus":0.03215305352131045,"score_gpt":0.29572967269622225,"score_spread":0.2635766191749118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239035810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025810583,0.02336071,0.00028233606,0.061504252,0.013585095,0.00025071023,0.007163855,0.00025634057,0.8910157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026164444,0.002283902,0.00005428109,0.0070013674,0.00034919695,0.000054761626,0.00035440928,0.00007554337,0.98721004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954754,0.000048988586,0.000020940985,0.00007066282,0.0001695758,0.00014224421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947375,0.00009488725,0.000026662274,0.000020758976,0.0002671566,0.000116859315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008087573,0.00072542625,0.00038676956,0.0007097495,0.0069119507,0.0028449032,0.0011961033,0.0049649887,0.19560032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021681304,0.00056955765,0.00030819024,0.0008136484,0.0006080864,0.0019581574,0.002300442,0.005134104,0.080148876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008193945,0.0000064222886,0.000093331575,0.000024622928,5.8931954e-7,0.000046294575,0.00014306536,0.00000911462,0.000028032122,0.0021589713,0.9931137,0.004367748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029813266,0.0000034059703,0.0010804953,0.000073459145,7.351913e-7,0.000016403554,0.0003557037,0.000008302157,0.000025243491,0.00026577432,0.99816257,0.000004940166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26875615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62113947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73124385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037351807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062906323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65434825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239577129","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-95943-3_234","title":"Canterbury Christ Church, University College, Graduate School","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Affairs Canada; Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance; Camargo Foundation; Canada Council for the Arts; Killam Trusts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032798877562944924,"score_gpt":0.25658948776855695,"score_spread":0.22379061020561203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239577129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007516051,0.009749129,0.00015430416,0.003985253,0.0017522268,0.000025309451,0.0002655059,0.000046687648,0.98326993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029534337,0.0013651504,0.00006151276,0.00024094638,0.00008284879,0.000009544529,0.000039067127,0.000037426227,0.9952101],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949086,0.00007839475,0.000017934497,0.00010240529,0.00019283425,0.00011760379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995012,0.00008243183,0.000028016479,0.000064612446,0.00017867345,0.00014502711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055409345,0.00068346265,0.00051545433,0.000920896,0.006756909,0.006010959,0.00088419515,0.0023965405,0.33630028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018598657,0.00055142964,0.00023652564,0.0018989877,0.0022458013,0.0030761508,0.0019821802,0.0050997557,0.05788934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026802796,0.0000186306,0.00009969622,0.00010728462,0.0000014303299,0.00010735944,0.0011153059,0.000051850227,0.00014736789,0.101046026,0.8397299,0.057548255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022818517,0.0000037631598,0.0002530957,0.00010958337,6.997681e-7,0.000020546971,0.00035995466,0.000008402894,0.000037004833,0.0017316695,0.9974694,0.0000036320412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13817456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44498017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66369975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069671334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007313498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9466871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244626071","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-4208-0183","title":"behind-closed-doors-how-faithbased-arbitration-shuts-out-womens-rights-in-canada-and-abroad-7-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doors; Arbitration; Political science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.018901141213635574,"score_gpt":0.31870015659048867,"score_spread":0.2997990153768531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244626071","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005986379,0.00010428001,0.000055718087,0.00018677351,0.00006482252,0.000021147898,0.9974355,0.00055303815,0.0009800213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010820426,0.000068339396,0.0003154099,0.00007982344,0.000014061847,0.00004928733,0.99699235,0.000067359,0.0013312576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909246,0.0001648441,0.00007780003,0.00020860357,0.00018565267,0.0002706377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819714,0.00040070293,0.00017440684,0.00053333666,0.0003567736,0.00033764765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010365468,0.0032670642,0.001012574,0.0027206838,0.0014068673,0.0026259043,0.003185875,0.0034877455,0.063324615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003990473,0.0007297373,0.002786409,0.0031400523,0.00077186484,0.0017216515,0.0026395947,0.002215191,0.07673084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009659192,0.00004976723,0.0022522209,0.00040643764,0.00003316129,0.000027597118,0.000042292842,0.00041480584,0.00009420521,0.00039079718,0.99384284,0.002349318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081160583,0.00004975535,0.012915542,0.0006618255,0.000083040126,0.00010892366,0.00047869285,0.0026925849,0.0009553364,0.0019464002,0.979226,0.00007023009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12000126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3339521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87999874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023695775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036724673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23860556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250679855","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330","title":"Multicultural Jurisdictions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":507,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Autonomy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Normative; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Corporate governance; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.023909360684186417,"score_gpt":0.24409119410231037,"score_spread":0.22018183341812395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250679855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029353661,0.007012696,0.0024463309,0.008273364,0.00047880234,0.00003317215,0.000035310964,0.00003714283,0.9523294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.878262,0.003694608,0.0014490125,0.0055664186,0.00035154136,0.00007617426,0.00005237458,0.00003552819,0.11051238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970579,0.0010173356,0.000079959435,0.00043663286,0.00057930214,0.0008287732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985683,0.0003444355,0.00015159854,0.00023494063,0.0003438149,0.0003568273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015190062,0.00028296676,0.00030958347,0.00088787434,0.006417492,0.0059730867,0.0007672116,0.0015546897,0.01044107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025006807,0.0002724111,0.00045567518,0.0010310055,0.0077387737,0.0044020726,0.010964566,0.0028201,0.0010686686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053908743,0.000010548128,0.0006124884,0.00004079136,0.0000058319833,0.00016570033,0.012128862,0.00007563118,0.00012162788,0.9570659,0.008122,0.02164537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010520054,0.00003643664,0.0025020312,0.00037454255,0.000025482084,0.0009632005,0.014539979,0.0002847373,0.00030973594,0.20952922,0.77140206,0.000022065042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072923494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0097717475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01044107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029102943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003766507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03492886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309241678","doi":"10.1017/9781009177856.041","title":"M. J. McDonnell and S. T. A. Pickett (1990)","year":2022,"lang":"war","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.02903325346538531,"score_gpt":0.222273121037746,"score_spread":0.19323986757236067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309241678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000929407,0.33031443,0.0032419204,0.028039666,0.005964573,0.00007004719,0.00052964425,0.00021458254,0.6306957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006194231,0.11036354,0.0022486078,0.003265888,0.00086238683,0.000037250047,0.00023601156,0.000113653965,0.8766784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987733,0.0000179548,0.000006691621,0.00002236447,0.00006227989,0.0000132750465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997644,0.000105362866,0.000014899219,0.000011411226,0.000061309685,0.00004271306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040374164,0.00066011143,0.00032970452,0.0012225774,0.0010786364,0.002050158,0.0006102261,0.0012191811,0.088050306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007299714,0.0004134718,0.00019619388,0.0015551443,0.000915165,0.0025271573,0.00063851866,0.0015442844,0.05148309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012662991,0.00001708038,0.000120747995,0.00017700614,0.000002004744,0.000052090596,0.00053619704,0.00004279041,0.00013342292,0.022660859,0.85292363,0.12332145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002016456,0.0000041997264,0.00037401906,0.0001625448,0.0000014634956,0.00008646828,0.00013368775,0.000018660654,0.000037511123,0.003979431,0.9951976,0.0000023382443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00873459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037360117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088050306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009937647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013394762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29455763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369141","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198854081.003.0002","title":"Social Context and Legal Developments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Politics; Patriarchy; Inequality; Race (biology); Ethnic group; Sociology; Political science; Relation (database); Gender studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03637972906945683,"score_gpt":0.2983762670957816,"score_spread":0.2619965380263247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013776639,0.009955937,0.00071461283,0.012754413,0.00026604527,0.000016339345,0.000028624476,0.0000130008475,0.9624742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8817513,0.009871247,0.00090264354,0.004399925,0.00059286953,0.000055155746,0.00005692416,0.000030424937,0.10233952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817014,0.0010352016,0.00004364684,0.0001565818,0.0003673887,0.00022689824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988518,0.00065582513,0.00011158084,0.00007289754,0.00016566903,0.0001422442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014033709,0.00021973686,0.00024091765,0.0012761421,0.0058460073,0.0068233665,0.00086106063,0.0019859844,0.011803656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014718629,0.00015910932,0.0001501167,0.001587015,0.02609382,0.0031287426,0.0036726627,0.0028901473,0.00074742513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.820941e-7,0.0000055837772,0.000051292547,0.000011847085,3.8082607e-7,0.000043117627,0.003443422,0.00004291612,0.000022919614,0.99237025,0.0014181066,0.0025896002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048932625,0.000015804024,0.0011264143,0.0004467135,0.0000026894359,0.00009934604,0.014202524,0.00018824718,0.00011355839,0.30432785,0.67946124,0.000010638345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014145935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024309672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014145935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008400814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004444789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060952425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322712695","doi":"10.17656/jlps.10219","title":"Political Governance and Citizen Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Cultural pluralism; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); Cultural diversity; Sociology; Political science; Minority rights; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01281529821310935,"score_gpt":0.28098591399954403,"score_spread":0.2681706157864347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322712695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008736596,0.003977925,0.010292288,0.04899295,0.0005536716,0.000078213874,0.00007013574,0.00004992758,0.92724824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78004646,0.0040053944,0.0036965145,0.015326157,0.0014951965,0.00028668603,0.0001272999,0.000088435176,0.19492789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087745,0.0038207716,0.00030287518,0.0015942261,0.0014736422,0.0019309666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945169,0.002543321,0.0007496586,0.0009315569,0.00063799147,0.0006206525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087063415,0.00045519893,0.0005653562,0.000957981,0.0064882697,0.012591256,0.0011001707,0.005676993,0.016514355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012116625,0.00030849743,0.00042649722,0.0020043356,0.027091434,0.0068245106,0.007836739,0.006509963,0.0017375181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001311316,0.0000036446538,0.00007485134,0.00000711269,9.4512546e-7,0.000010807943,0.0006527482,0.000041322684,0.000017220107,0.9938792,0.0024782782,0.0028325561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012542771,0.000010526454,0.00028861707,0.00012347472,0.000003577759,0.00004106103,0.0008023764,0.00016106458,0.00008108481,0.7196945,0.2787736,0.000007541048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00830355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007747641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016514355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049429806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008016304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055246055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366826253","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2023.10","title":"A Political Theology of Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Politics; Link (geometry); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer network; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.10214871443126222,"score_gpt":0.4050267276625238,"score_spread":0.30287801323126157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366826253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009220893,0.0059859087,0.009226588,0.10031546,0.0005534498,0.000022544751,0.00010295397,0.000029243263,0.87454283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8933786,0.0034698085,0.002768451,0.010306629,0.001272265,0.0000944541,0.00005128147,0.00006299144,0.088595435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714917,0.00164597,0.000047463895,0.0003212249,0.00046084443,0.00037536165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979164,0.0011084912,0.00017212986,0.00031055117,0.00029727365,0.00019510134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027801185,0.0002693063,0.00026609807,0.0012238066,0.0059814355,0.008782616,0.00060163834,0.0036019066,0.0095369965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005453913,0.00022076163,0.0003030803,0.0010185902,0.029246554,0.0056029223,0.0019996425,0.0051822863,0.0010367206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8278234e-7,0.0000014090018,0.000026526423,0.0000022066943,3.4325774e-7,0.0000051380625,0.00020139874,0.000023205126,0.0000067767282,0.9971284,0.0021089597,0.0004950019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044796475,0.0000033001568,0.00018678598,0.000044620745,0.0000015603978,0.000020177658,0.0006667734,0.00023924216,0.00003221316,0.92800426,0.070794016,0.0000026548578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071254456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006198856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095369965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064711063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004334656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046951413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386506683","doi":"10.1515/9781772126716-006","title":"4. Group Rights and Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trinity Western University","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.018081018512653407,"score_gpt":0.21403547039808754,"score_spread":0.19595445188543414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386506683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047112288,0.005526055,0.0003037354,0.002130882,0.0002717919,0.000012129388,0.00003815806,0.000017237364,0.99122894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018076437,0.0026749787,0.00030549415,0.0011646657,0.00015315281,0.00002632835,0.000038284223,0.000024456353,0.97753626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996001,0.00007497103,0.000006606117,0.00003769212,0.00016177828,0.00011886934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980766,0.00005706649,0.000009044778,0.000026162199,0.00006694841,0.00003308013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000489278,0.0007286272,0.00039137952,0.0013095033,0.004117769,0.00514073,0.0011401772,0.0041455133,0.05705604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006646449,0.000305813,0.00026748792,0.0019475113,0.0056179552,0.0020332073,0.0011672092,0.0030215068,0.0089224875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055846504,0.000014942748,0.000048312242,0.000049343784,0.0000010923513,0.000031512962,0.0013765569,0.000089988505,0.000057413694,0.8640299,0.11381659,0.020478746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007331858,0.000005168997,0.00037330747,0.00014379642,0.0000030144918,0.000030381596,0.0007368442,0.00006234238,0.000060030223,0.10469284,0.89388,0.0000050632707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26725405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5056412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26725405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010522645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006872384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5313969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386628760","doi":"10.5040/9781350297296.ch-13","title":"The Permissible and Contested Boundaries of Religious Dress Worn in Schools: Contemporary Examples of Religious Restriction in Canada, France, Kenya and Turkey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.019380986493882216,"score_gpt":0.26611971101549897,"score_spread":0.24673872452161677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386628760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89308554,0.0010563649,0.000251831,0.0041246787,0.0000476503,0.000028092907,0.00010097752,0.000012608516,0.101292215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99054307,0.00022141798,0.00009756985,0.00020587906,0.0000047932353,0.0000066515445,0.000018191397,0.000008192673,0.0088943355],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772733,0.0006779858,0.000039711525,0.00011405099,0.00029138027,0.0011495531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844056,0.00043850904,0.00024267827,0.00007101777,0.00030871553,0.00049848895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011327794,0.00024918737,0.00027794242,0.0019251682,0.030620292,0.0047476413,0.0013390579,0.0022378615,0.0049288045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018083525,0.0002341211,0.0002194335,0.0036068475,0.020856371,0.0014678695,0.0037110609,0.0036425414,0.0003300042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045256565,0.000090625974,0.0204119,0.00007689141,0.0000060828056,0.0013002879,0.86823994,0.00009616058,0.0003171691,0.08691683,0.0066230646,0.015875759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000907531,0.000016557886,0.049626444,0.00016772513,0.000008088284,0.00044760454,0.8799127,0.000102591985,0.0002091743,0.0022225839,0.067250155,0.000027222826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79778665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94140756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20221335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024768645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01736409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40680844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386984679","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96073-6_9628","title":"Canterbury Christ Church, University College, Graduate School","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; Camargo Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04810982172630491,"score_gpt":0.26887726705078485,"score_spread":0.22076744532447995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386984679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005611392,0.003491214,0.00022223846,0.0016885613,0.00059423724,0.000017988796,0.00017782603,0.00006902397,0.9931778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014484546,0.0006364988,0.00011345362,0.0001624378,0.000022606013,0.000005338803,0.000033493423,0.000027857095,0.99754983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998079,0.000018711058,0.000005110715,0.000044994693,0.00007858155,0.000044783217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997148,0.000041377683,0.000011715562,0.00002145422,0.00010390808,0.00010671308],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021610597,0.0004542453,0.00024447136,0.000634172,0.0047008772,0.0035579738,0.000665193,0.0011537953,0.34081313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007049086,0.0004329498,0.00018247637,0.0009989999,0.0010745549,0.0020455567,0.00091068575,0.002517877,0.06243303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017094573,0.000023074934,0.00019111767,0.00008390196,9.4511165e-7,0.0001525539,0.0008713224,0.00005909707,0.00030203958,0.043035243,0.8934327,0.061831087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.350174e-7,0.0000031503346,0.00023479472,0.00005053237,3.5286325e-7,0.000033669487,0.00024050947,0.0000133705535,0.000046653928,0.0007755501,0.9985984,0.0000021695007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09855937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42125162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65918684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003471593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044898316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94025004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391034185","doi":"10.62221/ctj.2024.103","title":"Evangelical Identity in Anglicanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cranmer Theological Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wycliffe College","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Identity (music); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Theology; Religious studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03523199778017817,"score_gpt":0.3958618546038265,"score_spread":0.36062985682364834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391034185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.592613,0.006445519,0.001062989,0.009838614,0.0005540856,0.000023906441,0.000019044288,0.000017715038,0.3894252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957052,0.00026541398,0.00008898313,0.00032363052,0.00004876482,0.0000045997263,0.0000029085902,0.0000033905387,0.0035571144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579096,0.0028709038,0.00011339062,0.00021188764,0.00037901083,0.0006338387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840707,0.0004903823,0.00028968047,0.00010402562,0.00022731947,0.0004815004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032505689,0.00018031782,0.00032908807,0.001234635,0.015303336,0.008554471,0.00046540733,0.0013340387,0.0026122723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029187724,0.0001551323,0.000090861555,0.0009839395,0.021913234,0.0023877386,0.0047638235,0.0025430275,0.0003134652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022412081,0.000066099885,0.0028285997,0.00005634692,0.000002379322,0.00040039353,0.56218594,0.000020009216,0.000186864,0.42439154,0.0018820767,0.007957361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017796736,0.00010455564,0.009924628,0.0005918291,0.000008660906,0.001107918,0.7352356,0.00017394766,0.00033592086,0.063475005,0.1889789,0.000045201086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047601988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067074713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015303336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035667652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029683823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025878847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600234","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1440","title":"Insulating the Church: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral v. Aga and the Suppression of Public Law in the Construction of Religious Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Religious freedom; Sociology; High Court; State (computer science); Constitutional court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05914093009292188,"score_gpt":0.31107352325989424,"score_spread":0.25193259316697236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40970826,0.076493055,0.0006877296,0.10900285,0.0008098776,0.00009702293,0.0002333857,0.000010248117,0.4029576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549719,0.01244888,0.00024516127,0.015046068,0.00010650483,0.000014777488,0.000026058073,0.0000037153209,0.017136926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983297,0.00036152496,0.000021510032,0.00008868874,0.0004801739,0.00071831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987275,0.00056947686,0.0001180698,0.0000307572,0.0003411924,0.00021297202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022521997,0.0001595216,0.0002033306,0.0007672624,0.010474383,0.005247606,0.0009708854,0.0037712622,0.0014320455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026982978,0.00017486534,0.00014624053,0.0010279822,0.007629902,0.00094679097,0.0009967183,0.0029541855,0.00008655708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056467106,0.000050959705,0.007533921,0.00026866494,0.00002772201,0.0015585916,0.017072396,0.0005408464,0.0007970724,0.91543883,0.03260625,0.024048233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014007182,0.000097959775,0.09696396,0.0024248366,0.00027309242,0.0007359635,0.088271536,0.0010538752,0.003300776,0.07882465,0.72770125,0.00021201548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8705376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95390844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12946242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024892123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06507441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26044965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392239603","doi":"10.1177/00405639231225145","title":"The “Hierarchy” of Truths in a New Context","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theological Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.09666824437422654,"score_gpt":0.42093700434134174,"score_spread":0.3242687599671152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392239603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08007531,0.015580776,0.1347515,0.24832326,0.0036025445,0.0001251109,0.00026510892,0.00020156233,0.51707476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713634,0.0014592594,0.015854431,0.004147381,0.0016560329,0.000081420454,0.00007458525,0.00007836642,0.0052851657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.978049,0.012812501,0.0011442915,0.0020844883,0.004515761,0.0013940027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98150796,0.010111881,0.0015816626,0.002694165,0.0026811878,0.0014231657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01951568,0.00079842366,0.0012126826,0.0069016875,0.010235677,0.01739951,0.0024298504,0.0056181685,0.0057619126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022031624,0.00080143224,0.0007938168,0.003160838,0.109713316,0.03926965,0.011847258,0.013341847,0.00069795165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004476549,0.000003017239,0.000052872572,0.000013510519,0.0000016403818,0.000016501515,0.003509148,0.000046114692,0.00004075025,0.994926,0.00036224638,0.0010238093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001352307,0.000012115611,0.00016823948,0.000072099894,0.000004538114,0.00003964234,0.0036163635,0.00026560866,0.00006108771,0.96712863,0.028606046,0.000012103854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047617215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003941981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01951568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010103403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070296237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10321003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392882722","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1743","title":"Embracing interdisciplinarity: CJAS's strategic vision for the future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.10817680141131042,"score_gpt":0.39010500205853915,"score_spread":0.28192820064722873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392882722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008314935,0.026658528,0.0018973877,0.87612593,0.084057055,0.00007390943,0.00007734644,0.00025771602,0.010020596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11755206,0.112258196,0.0610033,0.4542094,0.18351738,0.0006942966,0.000949372,0.0012508344,0.068565205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88714844,0.037897054,0.006256959,0.005159486,0.04742201,0.01611607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45823774,0.050816327,0.011789616,0.013138343,0.11575408,0.35026383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21220201,0.0021009634,0.0021227146,0.010659196,0.030680168,0.070295714,0.01013076,0.03583068,0.011427568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13677303,0.001218484,0.0027320215,0.008516729,0.030341556,0.04270955,0.023005411,0.043590073,0.007025231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008985097,0.000091921924,0.00046020854,0.00058285904,0.000029495988,0.00040188618,0.004006803,0.00021412942,0.00033702393,0.13274854,0.8010749,0.05996237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026725955,0.000036349476,0.00047731644,0.00073863135,0.0000112143525,0.00027907788,0.004518351,0.00023456963,0.00011572052,0.039486997,0.95399326,0.0000817443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08008341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09377701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042690862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34371206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97149515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394963210","doi":"10.1080/17449057.2024.2322866","title":"Navigating Between National Unity and Political Expediency: The Federal Government’s Response to Substate Identity Policy in Nigeria and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnopolitics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions","keywords":"Politics; National Unity; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Identity (music); National identity; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.026886081037990717,"score_gpt":0.3733240901830262,"score_spread":0.3464380091450355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394963210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95821816,0.00021701498,0.00011054853,0.009555752,0.000045135595,0.000025422643,0.000022888356,0.0000028508919,0.031802233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967781,0.00014896401,0.00005777392,0.000513757,0.0000029022929,0.000004894671,0.0000074010227,0.0000023456369,0.0024840578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606663,0.00095785526,0.00007178791,0.00021011209,0.00052265014,0.0021709127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950805,0.001135738,0.00049429457,0.00012700788,0.0010170204,0.002145373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027382346,0.00013947824,0.00022712261,0.00072798796,0.029274331,0.005956451,0.0007411043,0.0016022255,0.00242612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234922,0.00017098639,0.00012180142,0.0011598344,0.008913043,0.0010591833,0.003826917,0.0031988123,0.000104900784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000313055,0.00013573478,0.13660589,0.00011896685,0.000028505301,0.0022483368,0.7270316,0.00081868534,0.0023416558,0.08271592,0.010316545,0.037325185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012294633,0.000023173317,0.05792218,0.00009920107,0.000010674572,0.000097584896,0.89770925,0.00025903838,0.00037610042,0.0020303873,0.04142194,0.000038245125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96464825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9250185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07498149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09935461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5440313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396709633","doi":"10.1515/9783111026176","title":"Religion and Diversity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Royal Historical Society; King's College London; Royal Irish Academy; Harvard University; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.020836198188623332,"score_gpt":0.27728478432715725,"score_spread":0.25644858613853394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396709633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072515244,0.065900795,0.0012432063,0.024824038,0.002130124,0.000029222954,0.00007001564,0.000032899585,0.8985182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45208183,0.03820084,0.0021979238,0.011079108,0.0039499225,0.00008786322,0.00013022484,0.0000828505,0.49218938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932504,0.00036314936,0.000017813709,0.000075901684,0.00013809266,0.000079944235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999549,0.00019306572,0.000032996057,0.0000789078,0.000047015612,0.00009899784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072811113,0.00033638516,0.00029695823,0.00081446016,0.0034365342,0.006211103,0.0004476624,0.001092331,0.010806891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013734434,0.00014159472,0.0001799885,0.0011425122,0.012876754,0.004244986,0.0040944503,0.0027996888,0.0017001275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008214083,0.000010315353,0.00031894582,0.000084043655,0.000004020894,0.000047341782,0.0074952384,0.000098968994,0.000078576435,0.91175747,0.0408877,0.0392092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005867372,0.000014119769,0.0007212096,0.00027605295,0.000002303787,0.00014977109,0.0027400004,0.000052001047,0.000042496293,0.20485923,0.7911314,0.000005694216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003368128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053680497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010806891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031301142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018013315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03615266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399174286","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-59940-8_4","title":"Contentious Terms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03211912112290058,"score_gpt":0.2990131772485159,"score_spread":0.26689405612561534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399174286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023886605,0.002739983,0.0016077764,0.0051569073,0.0029077732,0.000027772161,0.00012777059,0.00006073731,0.9871323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041095773,0.0015805846,0.0005342461,0.003792484,0.0016266137,0.000056469027,0.00010226429,0.00014949802,0.9880483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909925,0.0002783102,0.00002820516,0.000107605556,0.0003860746,0.00010051122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992299,0.00032708127,0.000035192665,0.00011809001,0.00022524518,0.00006454342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000930539,0.0009063887,0.000654955,0.0018825515,0.0030772942,0.008462907,0.0016236617,0.0029243715,0.16322084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036495777,0.00032279422,0.00032978685,0.0022890063,0.0041830325,0.0071354983,0.0026701728,0.004593698,0.082562156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007830032,0.000016480484,0.000021323305,0.000057575668,0.0000015568486,0.000019298826,0.00043205565,0.0000512156,0.00008277576,0.5576149,0.42450383,0.017191203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018324614,0.0000023070875,0.00002420309,0.000050203274,9.93295e-7,0.00002080948,0.00016743157,0.000046123358,0.00003344125,0.047594216,0.95205605,0.0000023977746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038893654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009979202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16322084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028560683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016445138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54602814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400534338","doi":"10.4324/9781003458128-6","title":"Religious Freedom or Multiculturalism?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Religious freedom; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economic freedom; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03763336751302306,"score_gpt":0.3116862492017393,"score_spread":0.2740528816887163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400534338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008422818,0.028493883,0.0007057345,0.02502829,0.0010463444,0.000011188196,0.000018036415,0.000013400406,0.9362602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57310295,0.025952592,0.0016411766,0.024985556,0.002519322,0.00005058999,0.000055536173,0.000045389377,0.37164694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995871,0.00018964412,0.0000061797587,0.00004355027,0.00008338618,0.00009013969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997024,0.000098347984,0.000023687966,0.00004014071,0.000031006064,0.00010434083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055423187,0.00021492665,0.00017926592,0.00049672625,0.0026681419,0.0036905922,0.0004603616,0.0010926609,0.009764022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068293524,0.000087465465,0.00015723432,0.0005496979,0.00860246,0.0036686254,0.0028812783,0.0021920665,0.0011989493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005084333,0.000014250936,0.00016231564,0.000035291763,0.0000013454578,0.000050012306,0.004915284,0.000030476223,0.000053201282,0.9504483,0.016247904,0.028036596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061232377,0.000015383765,0.0006830337,0.00021503691,0.0000020278733,0.00020558924,0.005042911,0.000074933065,0.000095793876,0.2663004,0.72735345,0.000005376622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00333561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067957453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009764022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018439849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015632162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03266388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401004569","doi":"10.1515/9781772840742-017","title":"15 Structural and Lateral Violence toward Metis Women in the Academy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03701746362573467,"score_gpt":0.24834513872802963,"score_spread":0.21132767510229494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401004569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18570615,0.0065851635,0.00009505891,0.021739727,0.00049354567,0.000047787136,0.00008798524,0.000012602011,0.78523195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6235934,0.0056862645,0.00014547467,0.0026010575,0.00013021936,0.00006742323,0.00005045641,0.00001713546,0.36770856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942327,0.00012656937,0.000010344117,0.000018280309,0.00008333571,0.0003382914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995622,0.00007692157,0.000032190568,0.000009413683,0.000070257985,0.00024901988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043754064,0.00031498252,0.00017802142,0.0008876583,0.02024226,0.0035966753,0.0008312002,0.0013961132,0.01680572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009185812,0.00024289612,0.00012230281,0.0013719787,0.005475402,0.0008133484,0.0034279504,0.0027139606,0.0010596607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007049409,0.00030201563,0.034364127,0.00020260994,0.000008537317,0.0019506124,0.37060484,0.00020617165,0.00086496625,0.4003447,0.11041978,0.080661215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013023771,0.00005379887,0.047476467,0.00063465716,0.00000881567,0.00046248134,0.5698922,0.00009141203,0.0003106855,0.009137029,0.3719039,0.000015417132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35339507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7174637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010073488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022674799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7026762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401804016","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96110-8_9527","title":"Canterbury Christ Church, University College, Graduate School","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Canada Council for the Arts; École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales; Strong","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03313847094213582,"score_gpt":0.2642028773735161,"score_spread":0.2310644064313803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401804016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029487447,0.003167608,0.00023088702,0.0052677016,0.0011292391,0.00004998704,0.00031757902,0.00007684679,0.9868116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032947038,0.00039270206,0.000096619944,0.00013822912,0.000034144323,0.000009629297,0.000032292042,0.000026625275,0.99597496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954826,0.00006933552,0.00001105096,0.00010140935,0.00014761266,0.00012226355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993268,0.00009126565,0.000027161857,0.000055017586,0.00017992787,0.0003199108],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005534099,0.0005043588,0.00033348505,0.00062815065,0.007205465,0.004750123,0.0008092884,0.00165362,0.42549533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001216655,0.00045512212,0.00020775232,0.0012320112,0.0019880675,0.0021109139,0.001892451,0.0036617003,0.07256303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004966299,0.000046168523,0.00037566453,0.00012875446,0.0000015042446,0.0002301524,0.0020364486,0.00009234818,0.00059634395,0.05710942,0.86185104,0.07748261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041316225,0.00001030131,0.00080259127,0.00009434312,7.740127e-7,0.00004029643,0.0009876052,0.000019677547,0.000118542644,0.0010329667,0.9968832,0.000005378506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09875169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44813046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5745047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004604643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006664978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81946117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406322564","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5033024","title":"Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause: A Case for Constitutional Guardrails on Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.012300208094892226,"score_gpt":0.294177215335637,"score_spread":0.28187700724074477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406322564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085741386,0.0013547584,0.016319606,0.43205312,0.0022923977,0.00031283213,0.00025650373,0.00012224098,0.46154723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7890873,0.0005896593,0.0054244855,0.16482869,0.0021922642,0.00043926583,0.00010081823,0.00014605284,0.0371916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795268,0.00651131,0.00080966816,0.003150992,0.0037308529,0.0062702736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95207,0.03731999,0.0024746123,0.003479225,0.0025976526,0.0020584005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034000866,0.00057389087,0.001399469,0.0011166098,0.012722432,0.013478715,0.0058411625,0.04599407,0.009751835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06774329,0.0011211087,0.0016268557,0.0013983294,0.026120948,0.01397384,0.00670227,0.048529215,0.0014561422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037214548,0.00003095542,0.00026642994,0.000011846124,0.000005340205,0.00018871966,0.001334886,0.000073133706,0.00014580428,0.98696405,0.009224518,0.0017171548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023507253,0.00009594911,0.0015030759,0.00042126072,0.00010674131,0.00034442946,0.003744365,0.0015438127,0.0010278582,0.83456546,0.15628366,0.0001283434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033974297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046146125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005333784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017578628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17981589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408167329","doi":"","title":"Quand les juges disent la laïcité. Perspectives belges et françaises","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01708898399631996,"score_gpt":0.26210479783948515,"score_spread":0.24501581384316518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408167329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054035377,0.11802652,0.00026361676,0.6360485,0.0032684747,0.000011553282,0.00014882682,0.000020274301,0.18817687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70929223,0.03747308,0.00032376984,0.075795725,0.0016637888,0.000026507038,0.00007313428,0.0000553663,0.17529641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996376,0.0013418671,0.00003454737,0.00011827201,0.00035576322,0.0017735143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984484,0.00040263718,0.00019388732,0.000041998028,0.000295571,0.0006175283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024091594,0.00029111878,0.0004698356,0.0007302733,0.009643347,0.006526171,0.000638115,0.005625027,0.011791148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002806884,0.00018825116,0.00032828838,0.001274469,0.010387378,0.003664429,0.0019248229,0.0053688926,0.0013311553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021262221,0.00014796444,0.007976421,0.00038787854,0.000049149694,0.0010390008,0.07172804,0.00017952065,0.00084911194,0.51440066,0.33331552,0.069714084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020833037,0.000029993651,0.015339544,0.00043142014,0.000013642992,0.00022830973,0.048830766,0.000048869824,0.00009154524,0.009119996,0.92582065,0.000024547993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45687476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5538839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45687476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011887551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014919967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90843093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415837968","doi":"10.1628/978-3-16-167219-4","title":"Religiöse Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"Mohr Siebeck eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Compulsory arbitration; Religious freedom; Constitutional court; Constitution; Legislation","score_opus":0.01710827414514607,"score_gpt":0.27731692045704737,"score_spread":0.2602086463119013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415837968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0102488855,0.010421561,0.0011121505,0.009133468,0.0002611444,0.000010073894,0.00005363424,0.000026046697,0.968733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6630765,0.012488419,0.0013847845,0.002464798,0.0002973956,0.000034738656,0.00008962367,0.000035860732,0.3201279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964845,0.00015399432,0.000008793184,0.000031240706,0.00008148797,0.00007593994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998229,0.0000794941,0.000024173383,0.000027404707,0.000019578929,0.000026463927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005340114,0.00017308192,0.000114191724,0.0005280272,0.0015740651,0.0030746988,0.00020048182,0.0007099146,0.011928114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009141284,0.0000940541,0.00010335037,0.00075005274,0.005907545,0.001113697,0.0018087365,0.0016054384,0.0017191799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000505851,0.000005116508,0.00014503494,0.000020386342,0.0000014002462,0.000047180478,0.0024237968,0.00009995732,0.00010443297,0.96999747,0.0107026845,0.016447531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000601604,0.000009899362,0.0014099893,0.00018044077,0.0000030878946,0.00018792311,0.0023189224,0.00017867667,0.0001720148,0.20836923,0.7871569,0.000007050548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006996911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011025784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011928114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002200267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010297097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03990352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416046982","doi":"10.1093/9780198922469.001.0001","title":"Dignity in Judgment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Polity; Autonomy; Faith; Islam; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.023066898728900255,"score_gpt":0.3179620914323274,"score_spread":0.2948951927034271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416046982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038842452,0.007222894,0.0056615234,0.050601516,0.0015485762,0.000059121096,0.00005943167,0.00005051511,0.9309122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71137244,0.005800158,0.0038743354,0.030019898,0.0018649113,0.00015156517,0.0001486668,0.00012036328,0.24664776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916283,0.0032203477,0.00045237818,0.001095859,0.0022836665,0.0013193802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508864,0.002615497,0.00021224786,0.0005671144,0.0009875352,0.00052897807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064255446,0.00046070514,0.00061432,0.001155674,0.007697359,0.014157697,0.0016626534,0.005653662,0.014306417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012919499,0.00030208044,0.00039172664,0.00078546716,0.034840506,0.0076271994,0.007849978,0.008611296,0.002675225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035212454,0.000004665444,0.00008607699,0.000018367984,0.0000013374422,0.00005791128,0.0017580901,0.00006684958,0.00002978579,0.97910905,0.01265014,0.0062142625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008935884,0.000015946061,0.00017295005,0.00039663093,0.0000039615475,0.000109831984,0.0020225167,0.00017681876,0.000103958286,0.58414066,0.41283566,0.000012265592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010556205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011812631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014306417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086635845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01001854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06285894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416336189","doi":"","title":"Introduction : les juges, exégètes de la laïcité","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012723055311673375,"score_gpt":0.2434152141681467,"score_spread":0.23069215885647334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416336189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002852217,0.03618001,0.00091714895,0.021562342,0.0083442405,0.000074074276,0.0004269141,0.00010974292,0.92953324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020589508,0.00853923,0.0005347045,0.0030027921,0.0014461633,0.000057563666,0.00017892414,0.00010160944,0.96554947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997167,0.0000910069,0.000012072362,0.00004403859,0.000089506386,0.00004668783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975806,0.00011130642,0.000013939552,0.000013931087,0.000058095768,0.000044656244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043092194,0.0005846014,0.0002757606,0.00088901544,0.0037956976,0.0036488585,0.0004450712,0.001409257,0.04641886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007973387,0.00022623735,0.00018970674,0.0010110876,0.0023586855,0.0019539476,0.0012087104,0.0038793008,0.008396672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023314804,0.00002416471,0.00018987813,0.00017815213,0.0000016723271,0.00010411808,0.008061413,0.00006957774,0.0002185265,0.34281337,0.61471,0.03360581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000134476,0.0000029814667,0.00022854141,0.00006061268,3.4636267e-7,0.00003560379,0.00058401126,0.000009535044,0.000016295473,0.0022357453,0.99682343,0.0000016500135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030794257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052655563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04641886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039453283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028083273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15528661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416581200","doi":"","title":"Avant-propos : et si le juge était une personne trans","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Unjust enrichment","score_opus":0.018388797411055,"score_gpt":0.2500692054230868,"score_spread":0.2316804080120318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416581200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052294005,0.009052641,0.0026985009,0.066718474,0.004077081,0.000048320497,0.00006904721,0.00007549826,0.8649665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36566094,0.002989886,0.0009630911,0.009911185,0.00062527426,0.000073601914,0.00003563721,0.00014553069,0.6195948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986041,0.0006485456,0.000031671392,0.00017494017,0.00025775944,0.0002830693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945265,0.00015555325,0.00004485833,0.000054708733,0.0001216406,0.00017049661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016032753,0.00044389267,0.00031316053,0.00047018283,0.008447472,0.005535328,0.00057294837,0.002289515,0.008273565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023475618,0.00024056304,0.0002730263,0.0005369833,0.012074375,0.00474638,0.0030927353,0.0066089346,0.0024552133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031462907,0.00003347047,0.0013626888,0.000053080163,0.000008565625,0.00047485172,0.1801016,0.000025453013,0.00038053002,0.74092185,0.056478195,0.020128315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051159423,0.000023318951,0.00122969,0.0001420165,0.000006353864,0.0005270782,0.06711633,0.000047036716,0.00024732194,0.021708151,0.9089318,0.000015874022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019619867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036167484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019619867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029213282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028051536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03901136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416898183","doi":"10.1515/9782766306800","title":"Laïcité versus multiculturalisme?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Nonconformist; Indignation","score_opus":0.03781930942436768,"score_gpt":0.3279790824044908,"score_spread":0.29015977298012313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416898183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06875145,0.049736846,0.0014096722,0.09352485,0.0010863629,0.000022310858,0.000053260675,0.000038401322,0.78537685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9177862,0.012782332,0.00047504622,0.0071751084,0.0006931675,0.000036278285,0.000035377594,0.00003875118,0.060977742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978788,0.0011644457,0.00003398765,0.00013771314,0.00030534557,0.00047973418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982799,0.0006341759,0.0003030799,0.00019342673,0.00019251485,0.00039687759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019517387,0.00028434765,0.00030653196,0.0014428694,0.0043156426,0.0060723424,0.0006612489,0.0016659827,0.009161948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030648035,0.00013506398,0.00026136046,0.0022295064,0.01849903,0.005744669,0.004361736,0.0028133513,0.0008805651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027050202,0.00002900749,0.0016479384,0.00014517334,0.000010393951,0.00018354921,0.047622472,0.000056715962,0.00010879391,0.9114344,0.012776985,0.025957618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038914306,0.00007424522,0.01090717,0.0012985417,0.000031930824,0.0008641684,0.1065092,0.00021621009,0.00029109872,0.19912957,0.6806021,0.0000368808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023757804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03204597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023757804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006808163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005388019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049396873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W574873243","doi":"10.1093/0198297467.001.0001","title":"The Ethics of Nationalism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Denial; Politics; Political science; Secession; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.055534556806220346,"score_gpt":0.3655998987856322,"score_spread":0.3100653419794119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W574873243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002198301,0.0063716867,0.0034530098,0.01747547,0.00053212483,0.000009500808,0.000024247194,0.000017113365,0.9699185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53722435,0.009058484,0.0048330314,0.010886407,0.0010313013,0.00018558919,0.00010834524,0.00011512894,0.43655744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975491,0.0015176407,0.0000524331,0.00019852312,0.00048683624,0.00019544475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.00063849735,0.00006745024,0.00015083152,0.00026796368,0.000107516506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017004457,0.000297161,0.00030525404,0.0005441038,0.0035304653,0.0051062508,0.0006199651,0.0021206662,0.005187965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025945592,0.00020314999,0.00021461192,0.00053415267,0.018100306,0.0043255915,0.0019462086,0.0041807983,0.001268077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001393598,0.0000018250182,0.000023586306,0.0000076177794,6.3735337e-7,0.000009760094,0.0005882095,0.00003866426,0.000014362768,0.98975706,0.00749532,0.0020616218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031600077,0.000005376431,0.00011578638,0.00013369588,0.0000015679122,0.000051024264,0.0007439697,0.00018243727,0.000070258335,0.6642811,0.3344081,0.000003629648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039945506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039520515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005187965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004909346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030282883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035620034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884582592","doi":"10.1093/acprof%3aoso/9780199548781.003.0020","title":"‘Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial and Religious Expression’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Durham Research Online (Durham University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Denial; Legislation; Convention; Sexual orientation; Immigration; Economic Justice; Human rights","score_opus":0.06364867257891318,"score_gpt":0.3799549774679924,"score_spread":0.3163063048890792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884582592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037393022,0.008150851,0.0021613264,0.01827756,0.00067645824,0.000021207985,0.000024101591,0.000017630307,0.9332779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89373994,0.0059050824,0.0008258481,0.006236966,0.0006567497,0.000045108376,0.00003384911,0.000029051338,0.092527434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841106,0.00086659554,0.000045882,0.00011492296,0.00035367822,0.00020785324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989473,0.00059428357,0.0001515176,0.00012077259,0.00008073158,0.00010544245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015477504,0.0002478836,0.00026148485,0.0004935711,0.0032670284,0.0038838473,0.0005480369,0.0022184744,0.009787863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030490942,0.00010209696,0.0001673528,0.00055842934,0.01749224,0.0030748742,0.0038934853,0.0026459477,0.0009994732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007753876,0.000023226328,0.000199277,0.00006149451,0.0000014708736,0.0001220855,0.026911236,0.000028099515,0.00013716785,0.9430585,0.008077871,0.021371778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017933655,0.000039924158,0.0039712,0.0005389633,0.0000053423023,0.001049752,0.040658865,0.00015247823,0.0007449534,0.35753968,0.5952599,0.000020938453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019210972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028102575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009787863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014630076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014079503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032743633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893754234","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3894009","title":"Religious-Based Discrimination Against Muslims in North American and European Prisons: \"Comprehensive Discrimination\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Racism; Prejudice (legal term); Islam","score_opus":0.04452360140394422,"score_gpt":0.27686156662738215,"score_spread":0.23233796522343791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893754234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972704,0.00010558456,0.000028540242,0.00026052128,0.0000090782705,0.0000023357143,0.0000074729523,3.9400786e-7,0.002315786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994042,0.00009755362,0.000023304625,0.00012552082,0.0000047802323,0.000001328902,0.000009093634,2.4280442e-7,0.00033399323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949634,0.0001607013,0.000023573793,0.00003863074,0.00008849777,0.00019221526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990521,0.00012059098,0.00035963624,0.00004985805,0.000103727165,0.00031408382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008147664,0.00010737619,0.00016350337,0.00053635763,0.002278162,0.000669855,0.0001588048,0.00041527936,0.0019270116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011379985,0.000063008956,0.00011517112,0.0004450962,0.0017984452,0.0006536056,0.002497451,0.0006485655,0.000084562955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000355621,0.00048688613,0.7038619,0.0001203413,0.000048445287,0.0012397032,0.19263002,0.00014826108,0.0033534102,0.01118305,0.002411343,0.08416099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008656646,0.00014506868,0.8590752,0.00012737504,0.00001200682,0.00079598546,0.1345149,0.00008528417,0.00028940328,0.00093596027,0.0039952756,0.0000148468325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077254903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032675605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077254903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005447857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007329705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015361011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894239672","doi":"10.5284/1082074","title":"Statement of Significance, Church of St Andrew, Sedbergh, Cumbria","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archaeology Data Service","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.07985433071839042,"score_gpt":0.34069983572435725,"score_spread":0.2608455050059668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894239672","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009550986,0.0040918672,0.0003783278,0.70054066,0.23114678,0.0008646608,0.008275336,0.00027369862,0.0448777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08379757,0.0068510054,0.0021789118,0.29206723,0.11263341,0.0022042745,0.002979688,0.0004123786,0.49687555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807125,0.00020933848,0.00022445657,0.00033565753,0.00068542175,0.00047387125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98800886,0.0026530137,0.00088732893,0.00045939398,0.004416706,0.0035746533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032707602,0.00055975304,0.0012422174,0.0010765488,0.0028233887,0.0041171922,0.0018380798,0.006967097,0.12494894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03705181,0.00040080227,0.0005576047,0.0009308539,0.0010150669,0.0010112465,0.0028676332,0.0050049596,0.025381925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015442318,0.000021176575,0.0010850546,0.00038589322,0.000011560661,0.0005962883,0.0005308188,0.000025136751,0.0005015072,0.0016809214,0.97924554,0.015761668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006249632,0.00006995819,0.007927771,0.00075945165,0.000021836493,0.0007548142,0.002733408,0.0002674092,0.00036558733,0.00075157866,0.9862584,0.00002726302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070829615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01162582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12494894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002162359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008903878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41799587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927566101","doi":"10.25949/19443584","title":"Accommodating Sharia: : A Feminist Institutionalist Analysis of Sharia law in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Macquarie University","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Multiculturalism; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Normative; Comparative law; State (computer science); Family law","score_opus":0.0357463213568792,"score_gpt":0.2999728607094842,"score_spread":0.264226539352605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927566101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7931478,0.0028743485,0.00079740584,0.01690516,0.0001003794,0.00008660924,0.00014239796,0.00001911668,0.18592677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98528844,0.0009630628,0.00031439625,0.0010984783,0.000008368339,0.000025358358,0.000028751398,0.000012388875,0.012260767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967405,0.0007667375,0.00006544211,0.00021736,0.0007731779,0.00143675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967763,0.0010154151,0.00026522198,0.0000729975,0.001170622,0.0006993776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020763327,0.0002659426,0.0003895218,0.0017499703,0.02888777,0.008643847,0.0018106953,0.0020111268,0.0033510285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040282747,0.00029410375,0.0002835082,0.0031535774,0.015685411,0.0021823032,0.004802434,0.0028994929,0.00015811354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031337335,0.00004575873,0.010991998,0.00013921973,0.000011934705,0.001414083,0.7589805,0.00051189034,0.0005057372,0.20683585,0.0065345634,0.013996992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073479882,0.000015864029,0.041815944,0.00038146574,0.000022346596,0.00022533884,0.80410296,0.00060491916,0.0002728762,0.0054876325,0.14699781,0.000065589345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14040501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14040501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10946578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6943905196","doi":"10.17176/20170910-214602","title":"Reconciling Religion: Lessons Learned from the Triple Talaq Case for Comparative Constitutional Governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"intR2Dok (Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Democracy; Constitutional law; Democratic governance; Constitutional amendment; Indigenous rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.19697312150635152,"score_gpt":0.4210426070470573,"score_spread":0.2240694855407058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6943905196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09260512,0.016292091,0.032922335,0.20360452,0.000922676,0.00008423022,0.000088449386,0.000055439654,0.65342516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97483486,0.0024214117,0.0038667896,0.008293234,0.00042741312,0.00008857992,0.00003526061,0.000047112237,0.009985334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99113995,0.006070373,0.00016524535,0.00058840896,0.0008358225,0.0012001985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872777,0.009953089,0.00032200204,0.0011699346,0.0007006306,0.0005767227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019422898,0.00038524612,0.0007013451,0.0016691795,0.009040727,0.010053982,0.0024634534,0.008144318,0.009202168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02014338,0.00028942566,0.00052422745,0.001979244,0.047077652,0.020794818,0.007599458,0.01013441,0.0004193778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046052583,0.0000042877123,0.00008932548,0.000009270675,0.0000015980442,0.00006986827,0.002685185,0.000091394504,0.000010782484,0.9937116,0.0011259641,0.0021961734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002054303,0.0000080089485,0.0002570254,0.00014183589,0.000004291106,0.00006856609,0.0067381808,0.00040437607,0.00007768267,0.94746834,0.044798788,0.000012278226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015983814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02802066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019422898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009109792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005237838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10271937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958698245","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.29455850","title":"Additional file 2 of Parents’ experiences of family-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Physical activity; Qualitative research; Component (thermodynamics); Systematic review","score_opus":0.12213469900048048,"score_gpt":0.4305695091504111,"score_spread":0.3084348101499306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958698245","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041350102,0.0004368603,0.0004997687,0.00045749595,0.000059480943,0.0044652172,0.99165994,0.00018744796,0.0018202966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01722757,0.0041909814,0.027935734,0.0033624168,0.00023978246,0.35004193,0.5635341,0.0009857612,0.032481838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962804,0.0010955242,0.0013345925,0.00038308304,0.00062319316,0.00028332244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9027432,0.08363247,0.0054989094,0.001390952,0.0059054946,0.0008288718],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010613258,0.0015250513,0.0030337842,0.010779619,0.0013098202,0.0027974572,0.0020773623,0.0018188495,0.8396016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089080274,0.0013190837,0.0029680296,0.013745829,0.00058448914,0.0034017863,0.0024737113,0.001300937,0.043629102],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011005253,0.00013175832,0.0015477163,0.440602,0.00048343054,0.00016076214,0.0012066961,0.0005982798,0.00021980057,0.003703771,0.5206219,0.02962338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01977861,0.0006166289,0.028043078,0.2684006,0.002676738,0.0004980166,0.0042831013,0.001348999,0.00081259134,0.017615324,0.655578,0.00034828522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011059465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02687551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8396016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038468572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009810655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22878891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967062088","doi":"10.5167/uzh-176679","title":"Fresh expressions of church and the mixed economy : potential and challenges for church development","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecclesiology; Protestantism; State (computer science); Diversity (politics); Expression (computer science); Local church; Mixed economy","score_opus":0.020006843168728226,"score_gpt":0.2282853725649506,"score_spread":0.20827852939622238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967062088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14419469,0.06827741,0.0059925737,0.5965538,0.002018732,0.00017734921,0.00017903977,0.00008212687,0.18252428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480315,0.019038122,0.0059986976,0.008106035,0.0004254044,0.00013054752,0.00008150568,0.000053580374,0.018134722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99271625,0.00439539,0.0001393725,0.00031165945,0.0007370763,0.0017002767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815475,0.005091266,0.0006334418,0.00080695155,0.0023446637,0.009576168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01713417,0.00028175296,0.0005899559,0.001352208,0.00874476,0.012567203,0.0028564755,0.0028838548,0.024333915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012026632,0.00032778454,0.0005061166,0.0013135668,0.01841962,0.012916618,0.021979516,0.0056176228,0.0014979473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000774043,0.0002446953,0.0049128872,0.00075938046,0.000020897995,0.0005178866,0.062112298,0.00017330228,0.00038615882,0.6970419,0.030275939,0.2034772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054100874,0.0001770244,0.008059066,0.0034481152,0.000023332603,0.0006079474,0.288986,0.000727858,0.00060899195,0.16463241,0.53260756,0.000067680674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0137881655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03091802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024333915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008806924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02946746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09061527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969042174","doi":"10.5683/sp2/ukrbnb","title":"Southminster United Church - Integrated Project Dossier (2014)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Church history; Local church; Christian Church; Intersection (aeronautics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.04080066042096831,"score_gpt":0.3245915215429907,"score_spread":0.2837908611220224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969042174","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034652677,0.00005472663,0.000031300726,0.00003374595,0.0000116972315,0.000011880202,0.99847144,0.000061534505,0.0009771651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000900945,0.000066006796,0.00025635847,0.000028173481,0.000004855281,0.00012740007,0.99689925,0.000051357678,0.0016656639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.00011685019,0.000094281444,0.00020179295,0.0002010371,0.0001599642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978928,0.00027184788,0.00027252844,0.00038060453,0.0009357332,0.00024654917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000889426,0.00091999274,0.0007362812,0.003634717,0.00070062664,0.0019534465,0.0012223196,0.00077744114,0.055164956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004836304,0.0005294063,0.0006171936,0.0063112564,0.00034007806,0.0011138582,0.0023183995,0.0009885404,0.041426204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009164968,0.000019204992,0.0048271106,0.0009400414,0.000037878686,0.000033366414,0.00015572572,0.00015811485,0.000098503704,0.0010288592,0.98770124,0.004908162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000999142,0.000011105368,0.023999605,0.000456857,0.00002183102,0.000034105382,0.0005220221,0.00015021543,0.00020317771,0.00044423764,0.9740305,0.000026373047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15743354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31614488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8425665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020238718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00308999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31303436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981294190","doi":"","title":"DS 87-9 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 9: Design Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering design process; Engineering education; Design education; Design elements and principles","score_opus":0.03822509788729904,"score_gpt":0.25124561642559573,"score_spread":0.21302051853829668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981294190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023193725,0.01578161,0.008962653,0.0046034786,0.029697213,0.00013434788,0.0008038476,0.0005597425,0.9371378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00603582,0.0060563125,0.0018997806,0.00032084063,0.0009963004,0.000047567784,0.00073189614,0.00034492515,0.9835666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988319,0.0001725945,0.000044038316,0.00009490982,0.0007529578,0.000103518236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887246,0.00017100076,0.000031036925,0.00013179131,0.0005554969,0.00023811874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015940517,0.0010809246,0.00097320386,0.0022345453,0.0014881946,0.0057388134,0.0008762217,0.0012335047,0.22522554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001787627,0.00042689932,0.0005658641,0.0017534931,0.001083616,0.0018014832,0.0023753592,0.0025561117,0.07741927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041034742,0.000102178186,0.00026275576,0.0002455758,0.000008116464,0.000037284357,0.000131175,0.0006967007,0.0008839337,0.018176662,0.78931755,0.19009702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022066113,0.00001859723,0.00029436487,0.00011306871,0.0000026704963,0.000044711287,0.00006693148,0.00025774588,0.0003792957,0.0021263915,0.99669063,0.0000033882607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048564123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012532327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22522554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028043678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042500603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7534545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981811280","doi":"","title":"FGA TRADES Now Offers Geothermal Service in North Bay","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Service (business); Geothermal gradient; Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01911128584208732,"score_gpt":0.2695322499663488,"score_spread":0.25042096412426146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981811280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012952677,0.00011460441,0.00012884325,0.001564474,0.0003024554,0.000061787134,0.001474926,0.00030798462,0.9947496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013839105,0.00003277902,0.000047536076,0.0004287292,0.000017423421,0.00001558173,0.00026208378,0.00005556126,0.99775654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996431,0.00003341478,0.000007336292,0.00004006383,0.00013250609,0.00014358031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911004,0.00015891295,0.000026429429,0.00006627789,0.00027397406,0.00036441404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058459665,0.0005569769,0.0002850485,0.0009960609,0.004212396,0.0026080888,0.0010346984,0.0040780394,0.6799964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012995105,0.0003679093,0.00035151682,0.00058592483,0.00070248434,0.00094236905,0.0024149066,0.0019289909,0.31903931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052298536,0.00010553639,0.000536277,0.000060081802,0.000001981538,0.00014037774,0.00017288327,0.000054089534,0.00039804413,0.007957599,0.9461603,0.044360492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023352632,0.000020629193,0.0020932464,0.000041701933,0.0000021778517,0.0000524497,0.00026758673,0.00012015707,0.00019696128,0.0007492427,0.99642617,0.000006361202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06746572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2090688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6799964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014303427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004060213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4564463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981856866","doi":"","title":"First T2K measurement of transverse kinematic imbalance in the muon-neutrino charged-current single-$π^+$ production channel containing at least one proton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules; Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron; Science and Technology Facilities Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Russian Foundation for Basic Research; Russian Science Foundation; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; CERN; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; European Regional Development Fund; U.S. Department of Energy; European Commission; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Compute Canada; Western Canada Research Grid","keywords":"Kinematics; Measure (data warehouse); Proton; Transverse plane; Production (economics); Detector; Channel (broadcasting)","score_opus":0.08372497980558352,"score_gpt":0.2546293683266229,"score_spread":0.1709043885210394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981856866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806253,0.000060602903,0.009576938,0.00008465311,0.000015062484,0.00003915472,0.000746016,0.00013672271,0.008715533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624,0.000031660722,0.0021733404,0.00002382122,0.0000042486713,0.000019001243,0.00029183098,0.000024252671,0.0011919177],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995547,0.000082054255,0.000011958942,0.00009324553,0.00015637415,0.0001016993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.00010167312,0.00016135523,0.000085611966,0.000086819615,0.00007840687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047400472,0.00034501022,0.00024266372,0.0005412661,0.00086634245,0.0006577289,0.00037837215,0.00043775485,0.004107342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000990179,0.00025457377,0.0002761608,0.00046929112,0.0005039112,0.0006656538,0.001180096,0.00047218218,0.00052420696],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043915664,0.00030579467,0.2833467,0.0002576921,0.00025191563,0.0012672908,0.0012507569,0.0057007596,0.6539738,0.011013276,0.0015691267,0.036671355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120336656,0.0014403284,0.29764798,0.000031717293,0.00018324195,0.0017508238,0.0011713551,0.019986385,0.6648526,0.0031395003,0.009477338,0.00019834732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031667391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060189213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004107342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008035452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006520154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01374048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982316797","doi":"","title":"I can see clearly now: Survey results from neonatal staff on mydriatic use in retinopathy or prematurity screening","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cyclopentolate; Mydriatics; Tropicamide; Pupil; Retinopathy of prematurity; Drug administration","score_opus":0.08981827219949577,"score_gpt":0.3117457954843088,"score_spread":0.22192752328481302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982316797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941022,0.00029841255,0.000103043574,0.001160364,0.000019412879,0.00012209729,0.0017541422,0.0000075250696,0.0024326507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599624,0.0007653299,0.00044265832,0.00094856735,0.000021712922,0.00029067032,0.00077847525,0.0000050969784,0.0007512733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966534,0.0010966506,0.00070532,0.0002339462,0.0008094064,0.00050123065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892392,0.0022516095,0.004871086,0.00029380538,0.00198672,0.0013575491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004952989,0.00011835865,0.00021656718,0.0007736263,0.00052565144,0.000694988,0.0005740596,0.00070770405,0.002780892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016986473,0.00028114166,0.0003950762,0.0009960433,0.00039258986,0.0010235289,0.0015416346,0.0006649364,0.00079038134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042588454,0.00005305387,0.985783,0.00016257026,0.000012365529,0.000053710795,0.004643156,0.000024119916,0.00013979619,0.0000253001,0.0017326389,0.0073278192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031702966,0.00016669558,0.9881523,0.00016293662,0.0000064268006,0.000099489414,0.0101724975,0.00004379023,0.000056562672,0.000008843765,0.001120653,0.0000065748736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03470199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0402354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03470199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009776512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018950404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069000006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983208623","doi":"","title":"LL.D. citation for Hon. Justice Archie Campbell, 19 June 2007","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Commission; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.02656444999705496,"score_gpt":0.31280402744817926,"score_spread":0.28623957745112427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983208623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000106787724,0.0016689755,0.00016066873,0.018692484,0.012207329,0.00017580499,0.003910884,0.00050165306,0.9625753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008961563,0.001001251,0.000055414646,0.0034849802,0.00067842245,0.00010277094,0.0006573759,0.0001404621,0.9929831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688137,0.00029182812,0.00022196097,0.00032414543,0.0016564203,0.0006242188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913334,0.0009955325,0.00028661115,0.00047063094,0.0058451244,0.001068749],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023639963,0.001141875,0.0020238322,0.00348511,0.0061220415,0.00810042,0.0023470437,0.0069716084,0.61590195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016249219,0.0009029614,0.0007125611,0.00447649,0.0015591251,0.0027213944,0.0034697622,0.0058879475,0.66253346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003159518,0.000005887167,0.000025138314,0.000023284,4.6856286e-7,0.000008144888,0.000016351572,0.0000065227987,0.000009891556,0.0012777513,0.99488384,0.0037395626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059553986,0.0000056996582,0.0003839926,0.00013033199,0.0000016104722,0.000012758956,0.00008840159,0.000025494086,0.000024925042,0.00042653803,0.99888724,0.00000703261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069725595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10877244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006685127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087399045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5478692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984835915","doi":"","title":"Sacramento","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Sister; Immigration; Politics; Faith; Rage (emotion); Alien; Human rights","score_opus":0.03285015552833374,"score_gpt":0.24576913682631046,"score_spread":0.21291898129797673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984835915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010435377,0.0025465318,0.0002703371,0.0021393513,0.0019574084,0.000039136456,0.0015630528,0.00042069558,0.9900199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003114897,0.0010365786,0.00024389337,0.00083319034,0.00025006273,0.000027352782,0.0007399305,0.00022695,0.9935272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992016,0.000082834806,0.000032118798,0.00029829648,0.00025461102,0.00013052291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992849,0.00012375134,0.000054402288,0.00010148963,0.00020407738,0.00023137283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031083537,0.0010090735,0.0005029133,0.0012542695,0.004133073,0.0063970163,0.0010103475,0.002422562,0.7742473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001644473,0.00046621187,0.0003613962,0.0012574891,0.0008813769,0.0024697878,0.0037710562,0.0023615696,0.4690057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010747223,0.000046918107,0.0007364857,0.00025603533,0.000008681005,0.0006760606,0.0008427636,0.000069632704,0.0007708476,0.020758983,0.846823,0.12890308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044823623,0.000008060677,0.00041489824,0.0000716148,0.0000015164352,0.00012080164,0.0002017985,0.000013471572,0.000059774982,0.00037383882,0.9987256,0.0000041529706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008954355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02720758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22575271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017815417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013428881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987627174","doi":"","title":"Theorizing Religions as Vestigial States in Relation to Gender and Law: Three Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Judaism; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Islam; Politics","score_opus":0.03046045040961023,"score_gpt":0.26397638999772355,"score_spread":0.2335159395881133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987627174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6770958,0.005162624,0.008577162,0.027660057,0.00021153921,0.00030611627,0.000100032754,0.000037682308,0.28084898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907626,0.0011598525,0.0014106428,0.0016192609,0.000033263565,0.00012934773,0.00001969125,0.000009535225,0.006542212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971367,0.0013939368,0.0000975864,0.00020240725,0.0004336989,0.00073556043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947464,0.003883429,0.00034152178,0.00031801473,0.000302203,0.0004085104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006576223,0.0006028553,0.0005495415,0.0020042849,0.015793156,0.006469393,0.0023970727,0.0068222587,0.002107998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077506728,0.0004986799,0.00081878976,0.0026955146,0.04941774,0.005897316,0.009043821,0.005808631,0.00015809576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017001852,0.000037749905,0.002789402,0.000029899507,0.0000041908834,0.0020864056,0.07339324,0.00013816179,0.00013938265,0.9173619,0.0010545078,0.0029480814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015862336,0.0001019361,0.01175296,0.0010193043,0.00009136143,0.0028593978,0.37632066,0.002456652,0.0017024385,0.4624761,0.14094174,0.00011878074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.123562895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17140734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123562895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017395688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004635404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24568737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989094166","doi":"","title":"Acts and proceedings of the Synod of the Presbyterian Church of Canada, in connection with the Church of Scotland : Session XXX, begun at Montreal, 26th May, 1858.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Connection (principal bundle); Period (music)","score_opus":0.004190856448498945,"score_gpt":0.17384697977771593,"score_spread":0.16965612332921698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989094166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025491787,0.03622333,0.00071000395,0.043307696,0.011211649,0.00036177514,0.0048594614,0.00011702353,0.87771726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09151855,0.0045077866,0.0003787793,0.00578636,0.0010072356,0.00013982954,0.0004569863,0.00009271477,0.89611167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990069,0.00014528644,0.00003258771,0.000089650355,0.00039311414,0.0003323604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927634,0.000121403486,0.00005168621,0.000041886036,0.00033160584,0.00017705339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010554453,0.0006266043,0.00034032032,0.00085681863,0.013690071,0.0024112104,0.0009533642,0.002432406,0.030929705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029136296,0.0003452002,0.00020571533,0.001359461,0.00263027,0.0007327502,0.001876014,0.0034228016,0.0027079002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068894755,0.000021350072,0.0008349116,0.00018278997,0.000008938141,0.0003312477,0.008593288,0.000052797557,0.0005621761,0.07678982,0.89796275,0.014590969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046539985,0.0000047566155,0.003294631,0.000054444892,0.0000019444374,0.000033360557,0.0015931588,0.000008394649,0.00012063055,0.000481129,0.99439454,0.000008398844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8095311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9465815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1904689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017913578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020596875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3831812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989708782","doi":"","title":"Canadian Freedom of Religion Case","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of religion; Multiculturalism; Religious freedom; Commission; Scope (computer science); Establishment Clause","score_opus":0.024661187186083528,"score_gpt":0.28249012341172713,"score_spread":0.2578289362256436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989708782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015395644,0.004865213,0.0003158127,0.08586117,0.0011033242,0.00012717309,0.0015865838,0.000046923284,0.8906982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39416954,0.008049592,0.0011828203,0.15878117,0.00067243364,0.00027430177,0.0018037112,0.00009477396,0.4349717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102247,0.000430471,0.00013345356,0.00061072555,0.003428069,0.0043747183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963652,0.0006134143,0.0001091991,0.00018608336,0.0014458316,0.0012803229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025794487,0.00068747666,0.00067879894,0.0023719098,0.039225403,0.007258238,0.0031708253,0.011046612,0.024643412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008528801,0.00072582456,0.00136927,0.004132616,0.0065907957,0.0020058784,0.004323274,0.009586272,0.0018456436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008662395,0.000053360855,0.0039483383,0.00011630943,0.00003304573,0.0023267288,0.0028440768,0.0002720201,0.0002201804,0.511412,0.4568325,0.02185475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079944526,0.000014216299,0.0067991,0.0002496053,0.000045494497,0.0005485334,0.0026516644,0.00022174457,0.00018598759,0.016894417,0.9722234,0.000085984175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09903773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09903773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15776129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991606804","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada – Religious Institutions (2022 Reissue)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Charter; Arbitration; Freedom of religion; Religious discrimination; Liability; Legislation; Religious organization; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.018484925147500567,"score_gpt":0.2727881238039921,"score_spread":0.25430319865649154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991606804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011649334,0.010308299,0.001627662,0.15856622,0.009343503,0.00031276586,0.0036574265,0.0002585373,0.8042761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08907167,0.0024390211,0.002781802,0.13853054,0.00084135233,0.00016572123,0.00062901527,0.00011427467,0.76542664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412906,0.00030053005,0.00015844706,0.00046662075,0.003136896,0.0018083605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968077,0.00037132122,0.00008807825,0.00016988833,0.0019860074,0.00057712663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968433,0.0005762884,0.0004162605,0.0013148717,0.013184848,0.007922624,0.0021642898,0.011926619,0.013328445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059344666,0.00059191673,0.000693205,0.0014497767,0.0053549693,0.0020222254,0.0024715685,0.008749614,0.0030407957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001859704,0.00002671946,0.0011407159,0.00003639291,0.000005820184,0.00020403664,0.0023716984,0.00013545509,0.0002680676,0.35311863,0.6288012,0.01387256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005294988,0.0000039875736,0.001852302,0.00006260839,0.0000043088735,0.00004741174,0.0007008231,0.00005314493,0.000118299475,0.0037544514,0.9933774,0.000020051302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99122745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052731648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052731648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1353462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38259667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995832096","doi":"","title":"The Potential Impact of Charter Section 28 on Quebec's Controversial Secularism Law and the Pursuit of Gender-Equality in Canadian Courts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Secularism; Section (typography); Supreme court; Scholarship; Intersectionality; Democracy; Common law","score_opus":0.011631398479884784,"score_gpt":0.282901649154736,"score_spread":0.2712702506748512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995832096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43135187,0.0035772151,0.0038164093,0.08861288,0.0005970771,0.00018779408,0.00038888614,0.00009335866,0.4713745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95583534,0.00096122763,0.0010070144,0.009390836,0.000046695593,0.000037987946,0.00004951889,0.00002212844,0.032649275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283856,0.001303286,0.000104214305,0.0007465892,0.0025210609,0.0024861614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913804,0.0034397214,0.0005484195,0.0003820892,0.0033211324,0.0009282882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060954383,0.00031896937,0.00033214418,0.0014129127,0.026120368,0.0099751,0.0022844588,0.0033756658,0.005696136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010087687,0.00034858185,0.0005316087,0.0014311193,0.0124616595,0.0021056843,0.002821117,0.004094522,0.00021792682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000648462,0.00006107722,0.017260358,0.000106495674,0.000033434506,0.0012931597,0.034199145,0.0017242153,0.0014832413,0.86715585,0.03174207,0.044876143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097479264,0.00023572541,0.107985884,0.0012719483,0.00018248208,0.00046135898,0.10291102,0.0058713453,0.004170958,0.05586876,0.72035784,0.0005851512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15148024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15148024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20955877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998890300","doi":"","title":"Banned for Believing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Duty; Charter; Context (archaeology); Convention; Supreme court; Appeal; Order (exchange); Common law","score_opus":0.00954994756906008,"score_gpt":0.23892069282894957,"score_spread":0.22937074525988949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998890300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064517446,0.0005855687,0.004981045,0.013319781,0.0013350208,0.00040577582,0.0013823364,0.00012452909,0.9133485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73600405,0.0010221526,0.005632954,0.016626794,0.0003070789,0.00066941645,0.0023149985,0.00009702336,0.23732547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934289,0.0010939451,0.0001927684,0.0004884402,0.003681963,0.0011138883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137986,0.0020685066,0.0008662398,0.0015588815,0.0028386712,0.0012877304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051024,0.00037989323,0.00043062953,0.0014150322,0.004081054,0.0029043562,0.0016615869,0.0021416447,0.08004394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019310713,0.00019729504,0.0004994722,0.0009603803,0.0040278174,0.0018573365,0.0030118779,0.004825428,0.009127876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035795057,0.0006972529,0.022638595,0.0002905011,0.00006740448,0.00083990337,0.0139926,0.0002955614,0.0032245922,0.6823755,0.095795445,0.1794246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010310539,0.0003333791,0.030655447,0.0007288999,0.00012120281,0.0010997934,0.007601735,0.0006596237,0.002846576,0.06562181,0.8901373,0.00009119181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06024421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14915179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08004394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004401452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008257914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2677737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999359524","doi":"","title":"Complementary Perspectives on Religious Accommodation in Europe and in Quebec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.013873207054720718,"score_gpt":0.22819683976631674,"score_spread":0.21432363271159602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999359524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49696058,0.01687822,0.0003008672,0.051103994,0.0005189808,0.000040644063,0.00062184787,0.0000108615895,0.43356407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538499,0.0045146504,0.00013746167,0.003038141,0.00007596418,0.000020057603,0.00012668625,0.0000072690664,0.03822988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988387,0.00033749692,0.00002858638,0.000046306468,0.00012580298,0.00062304764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983912,0.0003805904,0.00013454758,0.000051340692,0.00050711277,0.00053521496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011541746,0.00024770998,0.00029648692,0.0026004394,0.0137436595,0.005932233,0.00086685526,0.0012578688,0.017154168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016742591,0.00011099704,0.00030365586,0.0065822406,0.0034100232,0.0019076974,0.0029032158,0.0018878902,0.00020045869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002547496,0.00030669526,0.07692133,0.00035926036,0.000100933,0.0019222845,0.20903239,0.00082235434,0.00071890553,0.5210105,0.06358269,0.12496792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040532716,0.000040901374,0.15260333,0.0006416655,0.000047868878,0.00024770715,0.49171612,0.000456057,0.00024888554,0.0077936566,0.34610292,0.000060346585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040726807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040726807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033064827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2954951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000690508","doi":"","title":"Freedom of religion as a universal human right: UDHR, Islam, and the late 20th century rights revolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Human rights; Islam; Freedom of religion; Government (linguistics); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.008944956144085203,"score_gpt":0.2543341153732081,"score_spread":0.2453891592291229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000690508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28448644,0.019438531,0.0011193748,0.17541221,0.000455872,0.00001842934,0.00005129421,0.00001295771,0.51900494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748291,0.0024908967,0.0001897468,0.0056611397,0.0002675946,0.000008231094,0.0000063803814,0.000007739147,0.01653922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985927,0.0007606392,0.000024909614,0.00008538417,0.00014840071,0.0003879622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983157,0.00095001963,0.00015000532,0.00012374997,0.00010552844,0.0003550028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033057968,0.00017521433,0.0002471148,0.0006103168,0.005581847,0.007358776,0.00044442038,0.002574065,0.005077401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027973494,0.000115070994,0.00012942,0.00072553277,0.032190077,0.004583264,0.0037318442,0.004467678,0.00022327687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014030614,0.00003502985,0.00039390044,0.000011003202,0.0000011597909,0.00004570715,0.013669914,0.00003706335,0.000070108596,0.9763916,0.002427492,0.006902957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030994615,0.000028581473,0.004472413,0.0003161749,0.000004763915,0.00010264569,0.038089342,0.00018238537,0.0002630869,0.7543083,0.20217845,0.000022907041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01940886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037653558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01940886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00674291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004380633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048923433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000725760","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of Human Rights Policies : a comparison between France, Canada and Turkey","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"United Nations","keywords":"Human rights; Obligation; Globalization; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.024742092272391485,"score_gpt":0.2996291993914868,"score_spread":0.2748871071190953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000725760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9110762,0.0055960496,0.00014067984,0.002106044,0.000026525002,0.000031712014,0.00054887513,0.00001854757,0.0804554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99218583,0.0020995818,0.00010214574,0.00014070461,0.0000044143735,0.00001062133,0.0002550717,0.000008463783,0.005193196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982596,0.0001513014,0.00004589793,0.00012326035,0.00047715308,0.00094270834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984609,0.00017172405,0.0002481172,0.00004752488,0.0007041263,0.0003675269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008696578,0.0003074261,0.00035802394,0.0039651394,0.0041562202,0.004654843,0.0006993112,0.00072882685,0.0050944597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020923265,0.00012561247,0.00043562995,0.0070756515,0.0028948933,0.0011559824,0.0015802708,0.00059521926,0.00023677631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088928896,0.0002764434,0.5011904,0.0007329207,0.00031553596,0.0031107347,0.058560226,0.007803798,0.0014403053,0.2142801,0.016175244,0.19522491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026700682,0.00005504118,0.85142374,0.0003127331,0.00006029798,0.00020469616,0.069866285,0.0008015722,0.00023339965,0.0015700189,0.07538787,0.000057589325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95791125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9644639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060058143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060058143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050964538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43575442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001121837","doi":"","title":"On the influence of American ideas in the Anglican Church in the Diocese of Montreal : (with other matter) / by Rev. I. Constantine, M.A.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Triacetin; Emperipolesis; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.004114319469220431,"score_gpt":0.19821520172787835,"score_spread":0.19410088225865793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001121837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41200092,0.008682673,0.0003237974,0.09589727,0.00067523285,0.000046880505,0.00022375637,0.00001849869,0.48213094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729091,0.0012114515,0.000053350577,0.0019380923,0.00012102286,0.000008052275,0.000011171397,0.000012394441,0.02373551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876463,0.00059950503,0.000008237999,0.000059479622,0.0001635809,0.00040463463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864084,0.0005328189,0.00014083427,0.0000442147,0.00022702168,0.00041421803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016079771,0.00027017633,0.00017254753,0.0006959312,0.0122735705,0.005274867,0.00091892434,0.0014795095,0.010389079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033373954,0.00015576625,0.00016942546,0.0010437096,0.020499835,0.0009514236,0.002301173,0.0028961722,0.00039888252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025378645,0.000163349,0.022180248,0.0001669241,0.000059852777,0.0015124814,0.40775177,0.00038242468,0.0017723709,0.43378043,0.09401969,0.0379567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010240103,0.00006229313,0.13376349,0.00056224986,0.000061264356,0.00019181067,0.3668631,0.00030201869,0.00089397613,0.019336741,0.4777753,0.000085207335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8203673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9092936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17963272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026194016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009693905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36138117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009776318","doi":"","title":"Family Law, Pluralism, and Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; State (computer science); Human rights; Family law; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism","score_opus":0.03218260263118863,"score_gpt":0.28337113729269364,"score_spread":0.25118853466150504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009776318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08127172,0.037803568,0.0058846325,0.14014421,0.0006398603,0.000040352483,0.00008817475,0.00003108661,0.7340963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730848,0.005211183,0.000989351,0.0054199197,0.00051303563,0.0000343281,0.000023189266,0.000008176423,0.014716025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613416,0.0021434396,0.00009706136,0.00043855986,0.0005212626,0.0006655695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755186,0.001163333,0.00035748747,0.0002241067,0.0002167289,0.0004864684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050112973,0.00024755366,0.0004132243,0.0010653412,0.008392401,0.004912638,0.00064771174,0.0036212192,0.0058315424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004499046,0.0001525161,0.00022903935,0.0011821707,0.0419338,0.004220505,0.004030686,0.0037297425,0.00031620258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030841593,0.000012661319,0.00025056684,0.000009151885,0.0000017058858,0.000050924285,0.0014765669,0.00006672787,0.000015951691,0.9920774,0.0019087798,0.004126471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011462967,0.000014304067,0.0008035713,0.00010890957,0.0000023562388,0.00009092483,0.0019281361,0.00012487234,0.000027182896,0.9470318,0.049849816,0.0000066960915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015537052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018412452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015537052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00574517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005031996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04168433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011023023","doi":"","title":"La compénétration des ordres normatifs : étude des rapports entre les ordres normatifs religieux et étatiques en France et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Field (mathematics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.0050730291556978875,"score_gpt":0.20074947289441772,"score_spread":0.19567644373871984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011023023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37488735,0.014377867,0.0048594545,0.05298113,0.0005343295,0.000054924585,0.0006243466,0.00006615459,0.55161446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528747,0.0044849883,0.0013535311,0.0012575372,0.0000744232,0.000027478978,0.00014715895,0.000033989854,0.039746277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463755,0.0025460578,0.00008505556,0.00036494635,0.0018417287,0.000524699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908698,0.0030432243,0.0009886862,0.00046795572,0.004062226,0.0005681461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061599645,0.00027837683,0.0002921461,0.0024313545,0.00763575,0.0076873307,0.0011974233,0.00087055325,0.0125819985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012332906,0.0001596543,0.00023880045,0.004192731,0.011107202,0.002577358,0.0021484739,0.0024156568,0.0005012068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010139404,0.000086065294,0.046261024,0.00033970346,0.00004233728,0.00023358548,0.1052436,0.000779354,0.00036690547,0.6194183,0.027803069,0.19932471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029710722,0.000057410653,0.2817643,0.0013212399,0.00004141034,0.0002008202,0.15764765,0.002217645,0.0014651191,0.034503806,0.5206266,0.0001242171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94701195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96636826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0569632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0569632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06756901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4132989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017251852","doi":"","title":"Angelo Rinella, La Shari’a in Occidente. Giurisdizioni e diritto islamico: Regno Unito, Canada e Stati Uniti d’America il Mulino, Bologna","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Headline; European union","score_opus":0.0702898508422462,"score_gpt":0.31433445213233985,"score_spread":0.24404460129009364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017251852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012791607,0.16021793,0.00022864867,0.7467059,0.020791452,0.00003292982,0.00091882295,0.000052703766,0.058260113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2822601,0.16347602,0.0013568081,0.11785998,0.01691238,0.00017348603,0.0008954934,0.00024234383,0.41682342],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999124,0.00031493304,0.00003854251,0.000104996456,0.00021407715,0.00020349301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998696,0.00041412757,0.000113146016,0.000044785487,0.00035589514,0.00037610639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014551682,0.00043265644,0.00031601213,0.00110837,0.0040724967,0.0033932696,0.0006537844,0.0026633549,0.01790935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037155466,0.00025274686,0.00016395892,0.0014124446,0.00177479,0.002105086,0.0012731731,0.0036325213,0.0030059344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036605834,0.00004770587,0.004497458,0.00013200648,0.000008193955,0.000082842715,0.0067593083,0.000026672256,0.000062537016,0.024342434,0.9190639,0.044940364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016580845,0.000009748306,0.017688842,0.00038368013,0.0000092039245,0.00013711081,0.01032972,0.00003172259,0.0000861213,0.0036086664,0.9676825,0.000016135084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16234413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37828904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8376559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004522286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064662984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32279837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018038258","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Secularization: Religious Pluralism and the Canadian Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Religious freedom; Constitution; Establishment Clause; Legislation","score_opus":0.00799136243682879,"score_gpt":0.19035306305228802,"score_spread":0.18236170061545923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018038258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2104512,0.008113549,0.0010257894,0.14576897,0.00033519033,0.00008042757,0.00054259965,0.000050853247,0.63363147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95320755,0.0023180244,0.00047238762,0.008535106,0.00011161109,0.000019664056,0.00007248618,0.000028121402,0.035235126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933296,0.00086961035,0.00011294155,0.00059086573,0.0019134284,0.0031834638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897877,0.00307057,0.0005433272,0.00045306157,0.0039009543,0.00224443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056171995,0.00031741377,0.000645159,0.0024179572,0.03209983,0.015757471,0.0027646245,0.005190247,0.012716163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018014396,0.00045185475,0.00045683363,0.0044012745,0.023167111,0.0038384083,0.0038751164,0.009191519,0.0003217944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004028699,0.000025586874,0.0030557814,0.000037878403,0.000011095892,0.00012034884,0.00829742,0.0003378903,0.00014155307,0.9549569,0.019764192,0.013211013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017225997,0.000048997124,0.06898406,0.00081107253,0.0001566409,0.00018134256,0.053597506,0.0030076099,0.0007851055,0.30098543,0.57091266,0.0003573533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99648404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99836653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1953301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1953301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26198703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.933303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026640410","doi":"","title":"Aménager la diversité: le droit de l'égalité face à la pluralité religieuse","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.011170538953812655,"score_gpt":0.22416540154389333,"score_spread":0.21299486259008069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026640410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6116427,0.0032591568,0.002285731,0.045140352,0.00023088194,0.000016133727,0.00003628465,0.000017520544,0.33737126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102014,0.0004528466,0.00010491992,0.00069239625,0.000045305915,0.0000034994289,0.000005059962,0.000006099499,0.007669795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980641,0.000977917,0.000029080458,0.00010501959,0.00033355813,0.0004902643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799263,0.00067387207,0.0003491191,0.00018657796,0.00020759205,0.00059012003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018517078,0.0001823541,0.00027265016,0.00088109175,0.008824662,0.007493865,0.0005137816,0.0016828377,0.0059194076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033278246,0.00009345626,0.00021220438,0.0012270228,0.021170095,0.0042751688,0.007890405,0.003067949,0.0003494551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007196343,0.000047366564,0.008759896,0.00006922141,0.0000144697015,0.00059332285,0.24220774,0.00011285411,0.0006230848,0.70286226,0.0036313515,0.041006513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021309243,0.00007007404,0.022994578,0.0005117147,0.000017616452,0.0010213634,0.45067987,0.00018768405,0.00058840046,0.1553503,0.3685089,0.00004822038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021211619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04112572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021211619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039745667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002739679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042176306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036078406","doi":"","title":"Another Breeding Record of the Ring-necked Duck for the Province of Quebec, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.019251755732767408,"score_gpt":0.20260529204737293,"score_spread":0.18335353631460552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036078406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462914,0.002321952,0.00078664604,0.0010219234,0.0001125104,0.00013521918,0.008258884,0.000054840824,0.041016754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966886,0.0008766577,0.001247675,0.00039916576,0.000016363132,0.000024437282,0.001901349,0.000026802376,0.028621597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971384,0.000022206992,0.0000071487575,0.00006262411,0.000079736354,0.00011443511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987191,0.00010411093,0.000094499825,0.00005496242,0.00076447544,0.00026287232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026213357,0.00024016335,0.00040750904,0.0015697828,0.0066050785,0.0010201596,0.0009920393,0.0005477486,0.00607379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063408166,0.00022034821,0.00018771847,0.0025469735,0.00086618034,0.00029117402,0.00038665198,0.00082727196,0.0005880923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004590956,0.00015486094,0.72967273,0.0004578015,0.000248343,0.008473485,0.043101113,0.00062055094,0.014663346,0.0032664817,0.047319382,0.15156275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008426723,0.00008043676,0.92788917,0.00015089764,0.000039021033,0.0012620427,0.010093953,0.00033629846,0.00043096088,0.000092320464,0.059578232,0.000038193233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99224323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014183276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014183276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013540343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10290736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037177836","doi":"","title":"Disruptive Choices: Agency, Religious Freedom, and Veiling Muslim Women in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Critical race theory; Public law; Scholarship; Human rights; Normative; State (computer science); Indigenous; Constitutional law; Law reform","score_opus":0.027356139692044087,"score_gpt":0.3023603522655171,"score_spread":0.275004212573473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037177836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79151255,0.0011903847,0.0005612227,0.034981657,0.00010612758,0.00004666135,0.00017047483,0.000013819769,0.17141709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920082,0.00019696364,0.000100104015,0.0011209755,0.000010639561,0.0000065776126,0.000011785706,0.000005910095,0.006538898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947339,0.0009066474,0.00007455314,0.00030994153,0.0008487435,0.0031262052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454814,0.0019116584,0.00045632385,0.0002098318,0.0008707486,0.002003315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004337676,0.000266342,0.0003629506,0.0015731233,0.03750515,0.009198095,0.001814392,0.0035320576,0.008254822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077219713,0.00029841275,0.0003470398,0.00251189,0.030557672,0.0023256638,0.005069004,0.006813531,0.00017628566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082239436,0.00013776061,0.03633528,0.000052865547,0.000025715859,0.00047941622,0.287329,0.00040680871,0.00052792067,0.637284,0.013205598,0.024133487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048233927,0.000044232824,0.10434694,0.00031124218,0.0000587011,0.00019680389,0.66229576,0.00090455223,0.00040923833,0.0501745,0.18100034,0.0002094471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98730034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08344522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08344522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11056973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60544026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038158744","doi":"","title":"Hedge funds had their best first quarter in 13 years to start 2019","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Hedge fund; Hedge; Investment (military); Revenue","score_opus":0.01986238538269223,"score_gpt":0.2813780835891479,"score_spread":0.26151569820645565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038158744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01637384,0.0027788978,0.0011838365,0.05676816,0.013223154,0.00023050801,0.016894583,0.0010996766,0.89144737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046881303,0.0006617088,0.00080121396,0.012538312,0.0009890982,0.00011255021,0.0049717603,0.0002528538,0.9327913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987668,0.00010373196,0.000037490165,0.00006165957,0.0005323233,0.0004980599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750155,0.00020058893,0.0001317493,0.00009243045,0.0007551948,0.0013184126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018666568,0.0005587374,0.0003349731,0.0011307601,0.0017989314,0.0052869054,0.0008218783,0.004085962,0.10897277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056262435,0.00025838034,0.0005046911,0.0005455041,0.0006450652,0.0016053299,0.0028484506,0.0034635388,0.03946377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002194553,0.0000819123,0.001757605,0.00006747131,0.000011314397,0.00012360264,0.000054838507,0.00011152839,0.00031376188,0.037299734,0.9195722,0.040386643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004475893,0.00004565391,0.004024934,0.00006518767,0.0000049758473,0.000048496386,0.00012411877,0.000219365,0.00038834292,0.0048324554,0.99018914,0.000012634423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024840724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041747272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10897277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037224884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009043723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36455023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043635859","doi":"","title":"Two letters to the Lord Bishop of Ontario on the question is lay baptism valid?.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Baptism; Covenant; Warrant; Absolute (philosophy); Worship; Conscience","score_opus":0.011659554769807255,"score_gpt":0.22634003146154172,"score_spread":0.21468047669173446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043635859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043805577,0.015441931,0.0007243664,0.32685965,0.025244232,0.0003332945,0.0019322601,0.0003776718,0.624706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007715401,0.0008565026,0.00015218677,0.024673324,0.000593041,0.000021515558,0.00015190779,0.000092996284,0.96574324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990095,0.000094588264,0.000030927415,0.00011623908,0.00042814796,0.00032052124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848723,0.0002322216,0.00006355019,0.000049321898,0.0007281845,0.0004393942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068420527,0.0005204481,0.00037950755,0.00047515336,0.013975672,0.003278179,0.0009180418,0.0054080463,0.19778135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003232947,0.00062362547,0.00033290658,0.00041769407,0.002511387,0.0015467375,0.0021109642,0.0058276844,0.05093427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020893443,0.0000075979297,0.0002468553,0.000026789747,0.000001360934,0.00012127544,0.00081509317,0.0000058158985,0.00018840557,0.002818277,0.990234,0.005513626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005620304,0.000004723684,0.0010253252,0.00004194488,0.000001385665,0.000029504565,0.0020604078,0.000011170308,0.000080646336,0.0003530916,0.99637586,0.00001028229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5918431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86612904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5918431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010286966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00854924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82112116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045197577","doi":"","title":"Aménager la diversité: le droit de l'égalité face à la pluralité religieuse","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02262111713405934,"score_gpt":0.2903407476771286,"score_spread":0.26771963054306924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045197577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26050818,0.0076976484,0.0028111443,0.03953107,0.0005116189,0.00001883404,0.000054516087,0.000040944524,0.6888261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94861907,0.0016408376,0.00031503898,0.0014437464,0.00020964179,0.000010164532,0.000014334519,0.000019647827,0.04772737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815565,0.0009420175,0.000045094643,0.000117123884,0.00040802508,0.0003320943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782073,0.0009154442,0.00036819943,0.00030703453,0.00017669064,0.00041201906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016723401,0.00017612638,0.00020878133,0.0009159855,0.0059520286,0.009836165,0.00044882167,0.0017991653,0.012552879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003557242,0.00008948423,0.0002178643,0.0016872124,0.013129678,0.00422192,0.006889204,0.0024369748,0.0011533508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005418577,0.000030890027,0.0030320454,0.000111011504,0.00000773441,0.00030293703,0.0743275,0.000061823164,0.0006045333,0.8668547,0.00562021,0.04899225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016504688,0.00006416313,0.01115105,0.0005436154,0.0000121811945,0.0008905633,0.081902996,0.00015354226,0.00096496934,0.14018323,0.76408094,0.000036218302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005892756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011583995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012552879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031383738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021853019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041993618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045337308","doi":"","title":"Address of the Synod of the Presbyterian church of Canada in connection with the Church of Scotland, to the members of that Church, on parental responsibility.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Liquation; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.008127446820433992,"score_gpt":0.20146553536413214,"score_spread":0.19333808854369816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045337308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032812178,0.014041253,0.00051050755,0.19070894,0.013422486,0.00023117714,0.00429324,0.0002039744,0.7437762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053470507,0.0016099443,0.00016219036,0.005749079,0.00045886956,0.0000152354205,0.00019438803,0.000045883604,0.938294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995752,0.00004297405,0.0000081224925,0.00003445713,0.00013593247,0.000203265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825305,0.00016581861,0.00006844958,0.00003613037,0.0006511556,0.0008253938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033758173,0.00022104051,0.00023738845,0.00050983275,0.011073153,0.0015402627,0.0004643903,0.0017316329,0.14612909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022571718,0.00016867109,0.00013206138,0.0004928861,0.0010039753,0.00046425906,0.0012328988,0.0030606075,0.009961532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005934913,0.00002193739,0.0030978841,0.00007877786,0.0000055801565,0.00046592043,0.004336559,0.00003219324,0.0006936129,0.011167161,0.95550144,0.02453962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036974423,0.000008401063,0.009410634,0.00006199594,0.0000022792449,0.00007855315,0.003956597,0.000024384042,0.00015332468,0.00024105511,0.98604923,0.000009854882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8087315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9449622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1912685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009774932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016994053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48885047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070479946","doi":"","title":"\"The participation of God himself\" : law and mediation in the thought of Richard Hooker","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Doctrine; Incarnation; Mediation; Creatures; Faith; Natural law; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02144122165392816,"score_gpt":0.2860844730925885,"score_spread":0.26464325143866035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070479946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07551393,0.068943664,0.017068379,0.19522837,0.0013456593,0.00006489335,0.00004564459,0.00026134867,0.64152807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414472,0.0064235805,0.002574642,0.009019267,0.00069499394,0.000063056206,0.000011938352,0.00007553968,0.039689813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959103,0.0026540067,0.00006757958,0.00037509805,0.00055118336,0.000441873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805874,0.0014646514,0.00014480317,0.00012931871,0.00009773328,0.000104775136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032189067,0.00038449618,0.000466004,0.0012132406,0.005483236,0.0055739647,0.0011441136,0.00401514,0.001879672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041720965,0.00033968096,0.0004481099,0.00070413755,0.037549276,0.0074547455,0.0035381753,0.0055146767,0.0005304739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000491178,0.0000067673473,0.000060408354,0.000014929048,0.0000019066581,0.0000678399,0.020723099,0.000057094894,0.000044991884,0.97208256,0.0048583057,0.0020772286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000275127,0.0000301392,0.0006879356,0.00027997087,0.000017985889,0.00038422717,0.015207788,0.000599159,0.00026997278,0.6670472,0.31539682,0.000051290317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125719495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009930917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0125719495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075541553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021137905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05480951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096743781","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Towards an Anglican Covenant (JSC March 2006) and","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Worship; Face (sociological concept); Context (archaeology); Windsor; Ecclesiology; Bishops; Body of Christ","score_opus":0.06297373301296447,"score_gpt":0.42418515797958845,"score_spread":0.36121142496662395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096743781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30291063,0.007845678,0.011782538,0.24929434,0.01733733,0.0017624281,0.0008064823,0.00043264407,0.40782797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49692178,0.0018264912,0.007270292,0.023233507,0.0008876231,0.0013367224,0.00033673766,0.0007166128,0.46747023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896702,0.007009317,0.00016351296,0.0006189421,0.001344236,0.0011937472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920769,0.0014975262,0.0002060115,0.00035299952,0.0033939409,0.0024726696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01351625,0.0006255195,0.00034801685,0.0006617463,0.039578144,0.0138776265,0.0015194512,0.0040405807,0.019641768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013960383,0.0006708509,0.00037251515,0.00087342056,0.007723868,0.0032708705,0.005086686,0.007974169,0.0026240356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109341105,0.00016375331,0.0015020381,0.00012432545,0.000006271986,0.00079631567,0.61779803,0.0001165145,0.0013419839,0.027671566,0.32224315,0.028126666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076838905,0.00005510948,0.0012266276,0.00015422942,0.0000027910855,0.000104225655,0.28472388,0.000038601836,0.0002927137,0.0006790924,0.7126871,0.000027894213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2250819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44580853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2250819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019809278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014562892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44754362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104177754","doi":"10.7202/1121375ar","title":"Astrid Von Busekist, La religion au tribunal. Essai sur le délibéralisme*","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.009415729247770873,"score_gpt":0.22585057460998442,"score_spread":0.21643484536221355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104177754","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051710254,0.6516191,0.00034389342,0.28514335,0.024405645,0.000017127602,0.00023285442,0.000026601825,0.03769436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045212716,0.66644424,0.0012125558,0.08588404,0.0154500855,0.00010652093,0.00038900503,0.00015419401,0.18514667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998042,0.000693991,0.0001201093,0.00018085909,0.00075402093,0.00020889082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661994,0.0018062862,0.00034826953,0.00011774045,0.0008185724,0.0002892513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019388812,0.0007821442,0.00064344547,0.0013617566,0.0040754103,0.0046604685,0.0012472966,0.00546431,0.022139587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006241679,0.00041480022,0.00030596467,0.0022552684,0.0033806572,0.006384741,0.0023138633,0.0074624512,0.0074623213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059412414,0.00001502747,0.00025631854,0.00036256152,0.000009822237,0.000069699156,0.0014825393,0.000023805851,0.00008017185,0.038933348,0.91869295,0.04001444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012908865,0.000009865219,0.0011391197,0.0007566513,0.000005587553,0.0000743211,0.0013090897,0.00001856637,0.00010712112,0.009056997,0.98749304,0.000016716182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042941272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110781915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9570587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004894794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050376286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08538264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104460804","doi":"10.1093/9780198922469.003.0006","title":"Dignity’s Epilogue?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Interpretation (philosophy); Autonomy; Individualism; Secularization; Dualism","score_opus":0.03045871171617695,"score_gpt":0.30379041530062334,"score_spread":0.27333170358444636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104460804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016854149,0.0132342735,0.003295451,0.039175395,0.005563373,0.000033687647,0.000051393647,0.000038982027,0.93692195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1895819,0.019564815,0.0026011595,0.046485245,0.004564004,0.00019262261,0.00014508974,0.00013165495,0.7367335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991652,0.00034870158,0.000026789925,0.0001050058,0.00026432463,0.000089972236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999483,0.00033486608,0.000021380953,0.000036885376,0.0000850656,0.000038879443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011453879,0.0003974896,0.00027650883,0.0008171296,0.0023579113,0.004770699,0.0007855709,0.0025587596,0.0122599695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020065669,0.00013543088,0.00022122859,0.0005858704,0.010392614,0.005203517,0.001854781,0.0057218936,0.0023461673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003127269,0.0000039488978,0.000016209018,0.000025275684,5.4401187e-7,0.000057669316,0.0011189254,0.000030392608,0.000044283148,0.95750463,0.034421477,0.0067735417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024642359,0.00001055054,0.00007127353,0.0002529091,0.0000012261848,0.00011504526,0.0013547374,0.000088634195,0.00012908923,0.13663137,0.86133724,0.000005470177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00489295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059688524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122599695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033926794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020511819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041013658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104832580","doi":"10.4000/154xu","title":"Stéphane Bernatchez, Pierre C. Noël, Raphaël Mathieu Legault-Laberge (dir.), Droit des religions Canada-Québec","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit des religions","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Order (exchange); Relation (database); Christianity","score_opus":0.011861897795009069,"score_gpt":0.2541912716711324,"score_spread":0.24232937387612336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104832580","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027527444,0.55833584,0.0015542575,0.31906888,0.07263449,0.00007702866,0.0015209508,0.00019803095,0.043857846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039714828,0.43962446,0.001758911,0.02423706,0.016073683,0.00010240346,0.00082300795,0.0003741518,0.4772916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986191,0.00028806133,0.00005538172,0.00025852205,0.00059389963,0.00018508892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969434,0.0005985046,0.000131147,0.000047741436,0.0016066558,0.000672497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020576182,0.0010572996,0.0009258915,0.0011743697,0.0039027375,0.0026566288,0.0008548428,0.0021326605,0.05431897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004781381,0.0004018948,0.0003070169,0.0011549697,0.0011553268,0.0013941003,0.0010126029,0.004324142,0.018736625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010191152,0.000027653128,0.0015260328,0.00037643817,0.000020854197,0.00019403291,0.00041736325,0.00010328062,0.00022400542,0.0050405837,0.8991518,0.09281604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014135456,0.000019597252,0.0057757287,0.00032467183,0.000011441806,0.00035687583,0.000763354,0.00011309481,0.00028289307,0.0011861852,0.99111724,0.000034721605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55269945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65406555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44730055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008996738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009132724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89986956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111695239","doi":"","title":"Questions About the Reasonable Accommodation of Minorities","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Reasonable accommodation; Accommodation; Constructive; Politics; Democracy; Property (philosophy); Legal culture","score_opus":0.017280938482975343,"score_gpt":0.28455619796656856,"score_spread":0.2672752594835932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111695239","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042387556,0.007888736,0.00526344,0.70275384,0.0017472864,0.000041631098,0.000071117924,0.000027852333,0.2398186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8602186,0.0023794456,0.0024871586,0.10877494,0.0023917288,0.00011109547,0.000055093948,0.00005718651,0.023524886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755563,0.014708385,0.0009957195,0.002734515,0.0031904324,0.0028146114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839118,0.009842744,0.0011767151,0.0016393024,0.0015832251,0.0018462795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02636275,0.00026636483,0.00072316575,0.000885702,0.016821057,0.010980851,0.003510686,0.01344653,0.0073214374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03734416,0.00043789155,0.0008783487,0.0009160187,0.06226754,0.013804567,0.010398245,0.014660004,0.0012467692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000816162,0.0000074566183,0.00018944482,0.000016752978,0.000002575275,0.00006130749,0.005603649,0.000048559912,0.000055063545,0.9874607,0.0043337294,0.0022126304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017242482,0.00002106204,0.00070024724,0.00019880291,0.000005624517,0.00014403192,0.009644433,0.00023148909,0.00017532537,0.8815201,0.10731241,0.000029207215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025400864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01722802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02636275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009167262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009019542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13942122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114428145","doi":"","title":"Dignity in Judgment. Constitutional Adjudication in Comparative Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Adjudication; Autonomy; Connotation; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Discretion","score_opus":0.12429530977278976,"score_gpt":0.4018050361164045,"score_spread":0.27750972634361476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114428145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016404006,0.032159954,0.004211417,0.008954119,0.0013140988,0.00004970503,0.00003336853,0.000027065344,0.9516098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4265442,0.048953682,0.0114558,0.015434825,0.0036492718,0.0005017211,0.0002845207,0.00022167593,0.49295422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965121,0.0019352471,0.00011895016,0.0003226513,0.0008385572,0.0002725342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770075,0.0016394808,0.0000938489,0.00018267844,0.00026873255,0.00011459559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026314287,0.00060894934,0.00057059765,0.0019411738,0.0068526603,0.008406965,0.0010438458,0.002723388,0.008897597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005579047,0.0002519548,0.00031978203,0.0025987406,0.02404457,0.0074183,0.0030731307,0.0046500224,0.0015706612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033492438,0.0000080583595,0.000031257994,0.00005527489,0.0000015879191,0.000033131346,0.0026845105,0.00005813135,0.000048578393,0.9722906,0.015182285,0.009603262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064492256,0.00001947464,0.00030298083,0.00034544358,0.000004171831,0.00011617848,0.0029441637,0.00011710923,0.000116636635,0.38601944,0.6099996,0.00000834271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074408045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013225728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092400815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092400815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042789113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067041755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116349764","doi":"10.5287/ora-5rknrqgm0","title":"A systems theoretical and reflexive law framework for the regulation of religious family life","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Reflexivity; Normative; Psychological intervention; Family law; State (computer science); Family life; Religious law; Conceptual framework","score_opus":0.031096373159497964,"score_gpt":0.31769050227787543,"score_spread":0.28659412911837745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116349764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028309599,0.0039301515,0.49189448,0.04975736,0.00041317404,0.00033571533,0.00016445966,0.00023825314,0.4249568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283087,0.0012539966,0.05530283,0.0023113785,0.00039943706,0.00069663586,0.00006519082,0.0000775403,0.011584331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923884,0.0047354763,0.00026738655,0.00086827955,0.0012284507,0.0005119333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927947,0.004426436,0.00075176026,0.0009680944,0.0006746046,0.00038443442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009424482,0.00051804294,0.0005512257,0.0021710123,0.004029306,0.009321278,0.0028401494,0.003395626,0.006450449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071247136,0.000413592,0.0012184863,0.0012844531,0.047548283,0.008730866,0.0041287867,0.004639502,0.00059768016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.277647e-7,0.000004077731,0.00003936535,0.000007151305,0.0000013656186,0.000007847278,0.00047830117,0.0003554112,0.000023653667,0.9984843,0.00013257469,0.0004652893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099616345,0.000012596446,0.000110528505,0.00003761949,0.0000032540736,0.00002104773,0.00045793614,0.0020989843,0.00007435749,0.98622185,0.010944415,0.0000074627983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051461007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013139153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013139153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008321687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09533167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117994686","doi":"10.1017/s0957876509023833","title":"Kerry O’Halloran, Myles McGregor-Lowndes, Karla W. Simon, Charity Law &amp; Social Policy: National and International Perspectives on the Functions of the Law Relating to Charities, Springer (Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, Volume 10), New York, 2008, 514 pp., index, $139.00","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Public law; Social policy; Public authority","score_opus":0.035463712564559546,"score_gpt":0.2947376791333898,"score_spread":0.2592739665688302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117994686","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013618816,0.67435753,0.0015929891,0.24941897,0.008167943,0.000053100393,0.00040395014,0.0001409456,0.06450268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018550184,0.7202638,0.002345296,0.041759536,0.005959809,0.00007161766,0.00031710663,0.00021795073,0.2105148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992455,0.0001166604,0.00004417292,0.00008384147,0.00044803615,0.000061774146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959692,0.0019111483,0.0003518445,0.000111008165,0.0011074451,0.00054943364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016021774,0.00068602693,0.000453176,0.0020933303,0.0024687906,0.0035213365,0.0014265786,0.0028769842,0.04748739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006808821,0.0007390907,0.00023635881,0.002448831,0.0020740377,0.007116751,0.0018569289,0.0038270203,0.018440511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021407253,0.000018370887,0.00030935192,0.00028336633,0.0000041701514,0.00004520399,0.0006091148,0.00003252359,0.00006295591,0.005646201,0.9350395,0.057927825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007826775,0.000008982278,0.0033353325,0.00071561313,0.0000052585783,0.00019414889,0.0019551502,0.00003997394,0.00014497877,0.0046546566,0.98891664,0.00002147511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040408775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12817304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04748739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025428352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003338971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1588611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126092596","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781399507431.003.0018","title":"Anglicans","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charisma; Liberalism; Christianity; Synod; Protestantism","score_opus":0.04771596393429815,"score_gpt":0.2541883087856775,"score_spread":0.20647234485137933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126092596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014888865,0.0140799545,0.0007440756,0.0019112047,0.0018762909,0.00010791378,0.00039926468,0.00013975418,0.9658527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04470462,0.006557302,0.00083590654,0.0020155224,0.00037708713,0.00008975793,0.00031867123,0.000108491884,0.94499266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994808,0.00016886136,0.0000287508,0.00008247984,0.0001226761,0.000116484945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955446,0.00008591309,0.000022631597,0.00004936247,0.00019320862,0.000094472045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006397579,0.0004679726,0.00033811945,0.0010471311,0.0050070714,0.004791796,0.0005194628,0.00072097237,0.08746529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009146389,0.00036351194,0.00014696507,0.0010044072,0.001009145,0.0016885825,0.0014481202,0.0014938619,0.04110823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014778315,0.00022686084,0.0023954883,0.00074037764,0.000010494385,0.00074485136,0.053788237,0.000068454116,0.0017106553,0.2626349,0.42269963,0.25483218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002264644,0.000015597401,0.0005611673,0.00009379902,0.0000015489169,0.00016680136,0.0029700487,0.000012546448,0.000101187325,0.0009045792,0.99516594,0.0000044608782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061501237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015296217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08746529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015000384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011456127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128612901","doi":"10.26180/10065695.v1","title":"The Reconciliation of Freedom of Religion with Anti-Discrimination Rights","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; International law","score_opus":0.008638607703180493,"score_gpt":0.21047778243926804,"score_spread":0.20183917473608753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128612901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04116775,0.0096332375,0.042954605,0.15929665,0.002383119,0.00013858279,0.000077561584,0.000058948655,0.74428964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91133976,0.004288823,0.011147548,0.031019215,0.0018786005,0.00016052606,0.000060867842,0.00006499555,0.040039685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97495294,0.009604789,0.0011652504,0.002365805,0.009052742,0.00285846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807755,0.010145121,0.0019580852,0.0034144616,0.002557371,0.0011494174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020058306,0.00047408856,0.0008058682,0.0017616962,0.0074188863,0.012096442,0.0037840623,0.01039438,0.0053185183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026946777,0.0005619898,0.0007357439,0.0018102239,0.07278138,0.012726794,0.012558697,0.016129466,0.00074022653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018577747,0.000006858428,0.00009760299,0.000017037959,0.0000020088157,0.000067360095,0.0015292026,0.000052229065,0.000047575246,0.9944096,0.0007653129,0.003003388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015672618,0.00004403466,0.0012616521,0.00060919335,0.000011820162,0.00043708587,0.0032073944,0.000391672,0.00032993508,0.84845704,0.14520095,0.00003360822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014995445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022049572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020058306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011852697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01589118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1060797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128641882","doi":"10.26180/10065695","title":"The Reconciliation of Freedom of Religion with Anti-Discrimination Rights","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; International law","score_opus":0.008638607703180493,"score_gpt":0.21047778243926804,"score_spread":0.20183917473608753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128641882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04116775,0.0096332375,0.042954605,0.15929665,0.002383119,0.00013858279,0.000077561584,0.000058948655,0.74428964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91133976,0.004288823,0.011147548,0.031019215,0.0018786005,0.00016052606,0.000060867842,0.00006499555,0.040039685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97495294,0.009604789,0.0011652504,0.002365805,0.009052742,0.00285846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807755,0.010145121,0.0019580852,0.0034144616,0.002557371,0.0011494174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020058306,0.00047408856,0.0008058682,0.0017616962,0.0074188863,0.012096442,0.0037840623,0.01039438,0.0053185183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026946777,0.0005619898,0.0007357439,0.0018102239,0.07278138,0.012726794,0.012558697,0.016129466,0.00074022653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018577747,0.000006858428,0.00009760299,0.000017037959,0.0000020088157,0.000067360095,0.0015292026,0.000052229065,0.000047575246,0.9944096,0.0007653129,0.003003388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015672618,0.00004403466,0.0012616521,0.00060919335,0.000011820162,0.00043708587,0.0032073944,0.000391672,0.00032993508,0.84845704,0.14520095,0.00003360822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014995445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022049572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020058306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011852697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01589118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1060797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132893257","doi":"","title":"Freedom of religion vs. substantive equality: Value-based resolution of conflicts in the context of the Ontario sharia law debate","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of religion; Charter; Dignity; Human rights; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Resolution (logic); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.04414177067204003,"score_gpt":0.33860509684188894,"score_spread":0.29446332616984894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132893257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10804724,0.0058951355,0.0031495627,0.21984908,0.00042044898,0.000074288364,0.00008871198,0.000016596205,0.6624589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95163465,0.0019187399,0.0012289718,0.0065020816,0.00015122154,0.000034498342,0.000017618819,0.00001680071,0.038495418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992234,0.0026618612,0.00016591832,0.00038211487,0.0024804012,0.0020756868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950507,0.0026429177,0.000429654,0.00021027647,0.00089446065,0.00077191205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065085166,0.00022619012,0.0004024302,0.0011451162,0.029452423,0.011569988,0.001548938,0.0055338736,0.004718481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009818288,0.00033830712,0.00033529193,0.002163286,0.047228165,0.0035291624,0.0044499403,0.0045959395,0.00021352222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020479296,0.000010638094,0.0014681824,0.000045084947,0.000004611207,0.00028125502,0.029319284,0.00023363801,0.00015109612,0.9517254,0.009982093,0.006758217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085829495,0.00002458015,0.015838364,0.000573333,0.00003858123,0.00020611801,0.07806077,0.0011455452,0.00049130304,0.43126506,0.4721742,0.000096401534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92035705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97621834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14268029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14268029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10589469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132959013","doi":"","title":"Bucking the Trend: A Study of the Local Theologies Contributing to Numerically Growing Anglican Congregations in the Dioceses of Huron and Toronto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Faith; Worship; Church attendance; Prayer; Period (music)","score_opus":0.023203442006423408,"score_gpt":0.3675771074070581,"score_spread":0.34437366540063474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132959013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976981,0.00019746715,0.000100375626,0.00046406424,0.000015305652,0.000032815788,0.000023848303,0.000002376991,0.0014656213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997294,0.0003604734,0.00021437742,0.00027007275,0.000008064144,0.000044340315,0.000034585468,0.000010258799,0.0017638622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975637,0.0013392427,0.00007818743,0.00021085174,0.00029407194,0.00051400956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624795,0.0014063012,0.0005674416,0.00015202007,0.00060987833,0.0010163869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033388836,0.00043980288,0.00046557153,0.0010852504,0.013843447,0.0044387123,0.0021480129,0.0008696918,0.0021860714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005916782,0.0008182411,0.00026563925,0.0011377794,0.013249148,0.0022599138,0.0048045674,0.0031455217,0.00021695903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008133965,0.000015921612,0.005341153,0.000023322085,0.0000019827746,0.00017858582,0.99309784,0.0000059826084,0.00016439472,0.00020799859,0.00020792619,0.00074676884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.5871726e-7,0.000009401804,0.004815007,0.000018546552,0.0000011508532,0.00003281818,0.99382496,0.000011675242,0.000026226842,0.0000130875405,0.0012430589,0.0000035337825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42458615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7506187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5754138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014681337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010798734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8442296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133041863","doi":"","title":"Anglican Stagnation and Growth in West Africa: The Case of St. Paul&apos;s Church, Fajara, The Gambia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wycliffe College","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Church Growth; Christianity; Government (linguistics); Period (music)","score_opus":0.03817666468477091,"score_gpt":0.36345294520408805,"score_spread":0.3252762805193171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133041863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899552,0.0009602406,0.000040356663,0.0013042849,0.00001836143,0.000011646663,0.000008103973,0.0000018215421,0.0076998654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967715,0.00090815156,0.00007766551,0.00018654506,0.000008122018,0.0000076048095,0.000007113389,0.0000043587825,0.0020290837],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989274,0.00044482818,0.000017020699,0.000038756905,0.00006291767,0.0005090447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998872,0.00045776585,0.00018023228,0.000031636355,0.000095857395,0.0003624686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001207425,0.0003071574,0.0003509896,0.0017002958,0.014931789,0.0057218685,0.00083224475,0.001262752,0.0023034522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019188612,0.00035058212,0.00013779884,0.0024934474,0.0066393674,0.002087422,0.0036311047,0.0022675833,0.0001473296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007357313,0.000093325354,0.0166426,0.00015739369,0.000009775178,0.011648111,0.9346352,0.00007637514,0.0008076306,0.021209743,0.00124674,0.0133995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062087634,0.000033758217,0.023368336,0.00017261102,0.000006749853,0.0009538262,0.9576535,0.000061543775,0.0001307577,0.0008090876,0.016795356,0.0000082199895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08019867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22364211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08019867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005725703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004097053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15946376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139346918","doi":"","title":"Fishing for Millennials? A Present Hope for the Diocese of Niagara","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Christian ministry; Liturgy; Blessing; Outreach; Fishing","score_opus":0.02556156048102094,"score_gpt":0.30850340168901524,"score_spread":0.2829418412079943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139346918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53027105,0.030624866,0.001382834,0.24331012,0.0057106875,0.0001098924,0.00013604836,0.000095570096,0.1883589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87193274,0.010388986,0.0017057055,0.014485663,0.00039953805,0.00009195463,0.000080502425,0.000070964044,0.10084382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991381,0.00040811836,0.000024709227,0.000108385495,0.00009114032,0.0002295646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978794,0.0002898202,0.00014190462,0.0001109102,0.00023318508,0.0013447949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014550076,0.00042688122,0.00045241977,0.0003203001,0.01955878,0.0062028496,0.0011376202,0.0015713763,0.008294806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016848393,0.00028172744,0.00017141098,0.0003901331,0.005714156,0.0042543164,0.0061804387,0.0063626147,0.0009522307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006637317,0.00009484931,0.00828549,0.0003361581,0.000011913088,0.0028031804,0.87330145,0.000022946333,0.0016954099,0.034423113,0.046246063,0.03271309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033555348,0.000033428056,0.0030242288,0.00036453703,0.0000042101087,0.0007032052,0.7674517,0.00002284174,0.00016810934,0.0016571746,0.22654943,0.000017750934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029840834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15495944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003825423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006380728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059334278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7143418433","doi":"10.70675/18f342acz2346z425dzb6ebzae739aa4c8a4","title":"L’existence d’une hiérarchie juridique favorisant la protection des convictions religieuses au sein des droits fondamentaux canadiens","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Legal norm; Millenarianism","score_opus":0.034479992129224854,"score_gpt":0.32746288416870173,"score_spread":0.29298289203947686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7143418433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5735305,0.0023279798,0.0043593105,0.024459537,0.00018563343,0.00014718871,0.00040062884,0.00009212028,0.39449713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616873,0.0006412431,0.00096242805,0.0015971616,0.000037567803,0.00004287711,0.00011054635,0.000015093944,0.03490577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970528,0.0006085512,0.00005824565,0.00031827154,0.00097177003,0.0009904125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950358,0.0008157471,0.00080794556,0.00037982423,0.0017213649,0.0012392416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026358087,0.00016337371,0.00025442502,0.001309562,0.008786266,0.0041091954,0.0007793921,0.00093577534,0.01662394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073862495,0.00029564212,0.00022895352,0.0018590143,0.005751727,0.0011493465,0.002225046,0.0024594492,0.0010364791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021044038,0.00010784488,0.16985363,0.00031624,0.00017634928,0.0005949836,0.09069098,0.0007795274,0.004521608,0.5717007,0.040543646,0.120504156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006376189,0.00012459766,0.59779775,0.0004010441,0.00008945569,0.00033047935,0.045260068,0.00049867784,0.0010612245,0.023113804,0.33112106,0.00013804455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63032883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8148284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36967117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015850767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031197213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74369645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7144394601","doi":"","title":"アングリカニズムの現代的展開 : 英国教会の都市問題との取り組みとそのダイナミックス","year":2003,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gospel; Expression (computer science); Ecclesiology; General partnership; Diversity (politics); Globalization; Movement (music)","score_opus":0.025638181083799418,"score_gpt":0.2931229480498037,"score_spread":0.2674847669660043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7144394601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106051445,0.018547585,0.032715317,0.06455102,0.008397133,0.00026477058,0.00031679147,0.00029310927,0.76886284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7494693,0.0029950503,0.0074548395,0.008631851,0.001518703,0.00012729643,0.00011126481,0.00018771777,0.22950406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818254,0.000951843,0.00009173368,0.0003068537,0.00030982657,0.00015718325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815685,0.0006021992,0.00016615006,0.00011446869,0.0007066656,0.00025372457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003500826,0.00047680028,0.0002475834,0.0007166676,0.0063879155,0.006799154,0.00043810508,0.0018095004,0.005191978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028300255,0.00030538038,0.00017903293,0.0004807967,0.011041852,0.0038659924,0.0017265849,0.0044072396,0.0025144503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100750745,0.000044445824,0.0026801517,0.00028496308,0.000012138675,0.0006371403,0.19641067,0.0001627579,0.001530414,0.70907164,0.050512757,0.038552232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016788877,0.000108777764,0.0031963834,0.00039043464,0.000017732384,0.00082851405,0.052957922,0.00061741687,0.001965189,0.044018682,0.89581734,0.00006480554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057588923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011454545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006799154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003160719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026819485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022932708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148885185","doi":"10.70675/1c18fbd5zd94az48e1z9aa0z19ddac6abe29","title":"L’arbitrage musulman dans les pays non musulmans","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private life; Procedural law; Child custody","score_opus":0.019832298583922228,"score_gpt":0.3138711633740918,"score_spread":0.2940388647901696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148885185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6378381,0.01595757,0.003229714,0.039763406,0.0006045639,0.00012335579,0.0003982532,0.00009486662,0.30199015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8138007,0.0026411873,0.00085848337,0.0028494818,0.00006451262,0.000030985273,0.00010373072,0.000027635619,0.17962325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729013,0.00042823973,0.00006917584,0.00027601336,0.0007258345,0.0012107006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844664,0.00039468615,0.00023038729,0.00008010197,0.00035246683,0.0004957588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015645504,0.00026996314,0.00038669107,0.000691501,0.017714374,0.005160326,0.000799877,0.001894366,0.022977792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027171606,0.0003448836,0.00019810372,0.0020707215,0.0048676804,0.0013211815,0.0021618528,0.0026284617,0.0010091085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015717483,0.00006819727,0.04885207,0.00035725808,0.00004919523,0.0035438258,0.09040204,0.00050822226,0.002374333,0.71822155,0.044738427,0.090727694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021349853,0.00004972447,0.08419324,0.00031340544,0.000019599915,0.000713646,0.046504423,0.00045116487,0.00076065527,0.006855018,0.8600728,0.000045021905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8344518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9344576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8344518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022684794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048418183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33304626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151903195","doi":"10.70675/64f404e9z1002z47dbz9ab6z6139f5cae50b","title":"La notion d'accommodement raisonnable en matière religieuse : Étude comparée entre la France et le Canada","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Ideal (ethics); Extension (predicate logic)","score_opus":0.009782420500022518,"score_gpt":0.2891821094221649,"score_spread":0.27939968892214234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7151903195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414365,0.004000244,0.0009031796,0.0035828063,0.000042824708,0.000035613004,0.00058659754,0.000013829516,0.049398307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99143124,0.0014454107,0.00029236032,0.00028151646,0.000008564795,0.000017808397,0.00017874799,0.0000120926115,0.006332295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978854,0.00049209106,0.000062848136,0.00018934347,0.0007358516,0.0006344424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959111,0.00096710864,0.00061534345,0.00017581396,0.001708124,0.00062247703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023338143,0.00028041436,0.0004567707,0.002295756,0.0072802706,0.0058086086,0.00096896326,0.00069770153,0.0059174383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004789252,0.00022297371,0.0005574976,0.0054765595,0.0048523955,0.001708465,0.0022117042,0.0015430966,0.0002308373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023609672,0.00012872998,0.45675564,0.00037915038,0.00029752604,0.0008288007,0.28341356,0.001390976,0.0008497127,0.1503555,0.008001878,0.097362414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027083805,0.00005399712,0.6829139,0.0008165231,0.00013101938,0.00025845604,0.19190885,0.0009497577,0.00038031145,0.0037683342,0.11868007,0.0001116562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.983192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05914213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05914213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059751447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4291082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162011023","doi":"10.82308/42064","title":"Faith-based arbitration in Ontario: promoting the option to exit and building fraternity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Windsor; Ex parte; Statute","score_opus":0.019939795426726317,"score_gpt":0.3068908784988052,"score_spread":0.2869510830720789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162011023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6687375,0.0010100729,0.003138718,0.023166688,0.00023171976,0.00021739285,0.00014551188,0.00004118604,0.30331117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93058825,0.0003743898,0.00091805897,0.0008502894,0.000022316952,0.000039089926,0.000033432323,0.000018330344,0.06715594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963748,0.00074929267,0.00009377817,0.00028837955,0.001086822,0.0014068881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577904,0.0008696813,0.00045532093,0.00040777706,0.0010984652,0.0013896738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003237537,0.0001908228,0.00024539008,0.0005040204,0.019234786,0.00394913,0.0012887242,0.0014523987,0.01040199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007586434,0.00026142775,0.0002786514,0.00085233396,0.009288513,0.0012766697,0.0056222673,0.0016995958,0.0004946013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019992529,0.000114302806,0.063731045,0.00028408284,0.000034108492,0.0032852471,0.3989242,0.00076474185,0.0029802718,0.40279728,0.033234194,0.09365056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053152216,0.000086870656,0.100494064,0.0003572189,0.000041151852,0.00039989172,0.18127732,0.0009123027,0.0012993613,0.01533786,0.69963896,0.00010177957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90839255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97586626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09160745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048836794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07650277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35433745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162994572","doi":"10.6082/t7n7r-2yn38","title":"Faith-Based Divorce Proceedings: Alternative Dispute Resolutions for Canadian Muslims","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Chicago","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Negotiation; Identification (biology); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01864414601817286,"score_gpt":0.23856549453312673,"score_spread":0.21992134851495387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162994572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6306535,0.0034474994,0.0017973424,0.14675067,0.0013520571,0.00062626536,0.00029126625,0.000059887727,0.21502149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95013857,0.0011623894,0.0014907138,0.011810097,0.00017172522,0.00012894934,0.00008855081,0.000020633683,0.03498851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867014,0.002821097,0.00037712863,0.00045897093,0.0032731148,0.006368262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98046803,0.009500312,0.0007151654,0.000605357,0.00445928,0.0042519146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017271413,0.00042749042,0.0005421121,0.0015808163,0.06584526,0.00928553,0.005180322,0.01330758,0.015067462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037467796,0.00054715166,0.000868779,0.0025377618,0.00697248,0.002773618,0.006059331,0.011673123,0.00067149056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012662365,0.0016493355,0.047015402,0.00032264713,0.00015771363,0.0058116238,0.13936833,0.0037526526,0.0012722033,0.3831141,0.2581378,0.158132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009733357,0.00044256813,0.0650517,0.0007995579,0.00040007092,0.0010108507,0.52598697,0.0058412207,0.0016624964,0.03183232,0.36553642,0.00046247157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9328147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06718528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0627146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1619942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4550284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163054838","doi":"10.6082/k8zgc-jjw19","title":"Faith-Based Divorce Proceedings: Alternative Dispute Resolutions for Canadian Muslims","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Chicago","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Negotiation; Identification (biology); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01864414601817286,"score_gpt":0.23856549453312673,"score_spread":0.21992134851495387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7163054838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6306535,0.0034474994,0.0017973424,0.14675067,0.0013520571,0.00062626536,0.00029126625,0.000059887727,0.21502149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95013857,0.0011623894,0.0014907138,0.011810097,0.00017172522,0.00012894934,0.00008855081,0.000020633683,0.03498851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867014,0.002821097,0.00037712863,0.00045897093,0.0032731148,0.006368262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98046803,0.009500312,0.0007151654,0.000605357,0.00445928,0.0042519146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017271413,0.00042749042,0.0005421121,0.0015808163,0.06584526,0.00928553,0.005180322,0.01330758,0.015067462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037467796,0.00054715166,0.000868779,0.0025377618,0.00697248,0.002773618,0.006059331,0.011673123,0.00067149056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012662365,0.0016493355,0.047015402,0.00032264713,0.00015771363,0.0058116238,0.13936833,0.0037526526,0.0012722033,0.3831141,0.2581378,0.158132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009733357,0.00044256813,0.0650517,0.0007995579,0.00040007092,0.0010108507,0.52598697,0.0058412207,0.0016624964,0.03183232,0.36553642,0.00046247157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9328147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06718528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0627146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1619942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4550284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W835925546","doi":"10.5206/uwoja.v11i1.8815","title":"The Influence of European Colonialism on Zande Customary Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02582770847668129,"score_gpt":0.2561349162807066,"score_spread":0.23030720780402533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W835925546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8606501,0.0010835534,0.00011488183,0.0022119947,0.000025475287,0.0000069059174,0.000029853358,0.0000032533753,0.13587394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964541,0.00017881875,0.000047815993,0.00017970944,0.0000059301037,0.0000016979874,0.000007073963,0.0000037845064,0.003121097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986123,0.00030826873,0.000044310265,0.000112993876,0.00013954772,0.00078268757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990338,0.0003942725,0.0002522682,0.00009006875,0.00013061817,0.00009897533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017847541,0.00013455634,0.00022576327,0.0009642481,0.0038282624,0.0049486808,0.00045965434,0.0010708394,0.0053829257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035620183,0.00019503133,0.00016424338,0.0013704089,0.00793784,0.001634251,0.0033194432,0.0019095525,0.00021003724],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006207274,0.000174148,0.059994034,0.00011982241,0.00008454473,0.0016823823,0.081061296,0.00057426357,0.0038220414,0.8030356,0.0038016657,0.045029543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011639036,0.00011003708,0.6772598,0.00053542806,0.00012214309,0.0007323437,0.06319839,0.0006502254,0.0020817453,0.03167006,0.22343886,0.00008463331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082882136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21519324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082882136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007614242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002972458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16479939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93254731","doi":"10.21991/c9jq1j","title":"KEEPING RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM UNDER WRAPS: THE CLOTHING CONTROVERSY IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Multiculturalism; Islam; Fundamentalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Human rights; Political science; Secularism; Terrorism; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.030083252814586223,"score_gpt":0.2688753680402263,"score_spread":0.2387921152256401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93254731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943355,0.01104196,0.000095159,0.004512009,0.00007951575,0.000011560931,0.000040584484,0.0000022815923,0.040861968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959092,0.0015514069,0.000041530275,0.0014498236,0.000031728177,0.0000035433823,0.000027067366,0.0000034046038,0.0009823075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778086,0.001186396,0.00010617815,0.00017890033,0.00018288764,0.0005647376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981371,0.0007725976,0.0004349224,0.00012663055,0.00019569111,0.00033306057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052062673,0.00026997138,0.00039126052,0.002074943,0.005784597,0.006103616,0.00068902655,0.0024848697,0.0018783564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035049757,0.00016649363,0.00029025908,0.00309947,0.007064953,0.0018757327,0.0034461892,0.0013318027,0.00010954305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010534535,0.00050737156,0.26856706,0.00066457834,0.0002811129,0.009090157,0.4259974,0.00038739643,0.0017414871,0.1648101,0.013912891,0.1129869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008654227,0.00022453118,0.533971,0.001184712,0.00009012414,0.0027787948,0.3395134,0.00015011946,0.00084768375,0.0053547635,0.11573449,0.00006387133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020877825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041346986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020877825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024005782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011186219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04151261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}