{"meta":{"query_hash":"84d431f4d265","filters":{"topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination"},"cohort_total":187,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":187,"exported":187,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/84d431f4d265","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Religious+Freedom+and+Discrimination"},"results":[{"id":"W1488097330","doi":"10.21991/c9s67t","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Sharia; Religious freedom; Nothing; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Human rights; Hatred; Freedom of religion; Islam; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04711717255424792,"score_gpt":0.2850996094726049,"score_spread":0.23798243691835697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488097330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025978968,0.00069241767,0.107102625,0.0074799573,0.002651039,0.00075688015,0.000048273054,0.0002918669,0.87837905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539346,0.00016504084,0.0011063134,0.0021508918,0.00030589598,0.000110130015,0.000064200525,0.000008923374,0.00069514976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997505,0.00017152092,0.00049934984,0.0004238566,0.0006737836,0.0007264911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986072,0.00018818525,0.00021491492,0.000361302,0.00041202497,0.00021632858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089373486,0.0002483565,0.00020480243,0.00016839014,0.004307307,0.00019820209,0.00055425876,0.00023520415,0.0006823946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008133965,0.00020127386,0.00020276614,0.0004699711,0.007776425,0.0010128408,0.00010110128,0.00027519075,0.0004298301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003502,0.00007702124,0.0059618466,0.000006059779,0.00003472312,0.000012549376,0.0020603538,0.000056352656,0.00006810284,0.98203474,0.00867994,0.0009732982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015905459,0.00009132111,0.0031279922,0.00017805382,0.00018501903,0.00008053462,0.042857096,0.00084395823,0.00076484244,0.74703723,0.20232256,0.00092082605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004328762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0104608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024563534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017320948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488657516","doi":"","title":"Church of Saints and Sinners","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America (Catholic Theological Society of America)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.016083185187417862,"score_gpt":0.2588470593235327,"score_spread":0.24276387413611483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488657516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552058,0.00076691917,0.00045293907,0.012625553,0.000089972025,0.0009885888,0.000027910799,0.0001077579,0.029734535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651078,0.004944071,0.027483672,0.0015455071,0.0001064889,0.00006937834,0.0000036653973,0.000024676052,0.0007147553],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611014,0.00019624087,0.001105303,0.0006680926,0.0011083062,0.00081193383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566776,0.000811023,0.0019405307,0.0003428091,0.0009707346,0.0002671307],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014483636,0.00045112122,0.001357028,0.000047825684,0.00048758293,0.000038572576,0.0015339137,0.00057518797,0.00047355003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001220906,0.00029260307,0.001478655,0.0011962857,0.02046575,0.000294708,0.00080144225,0.0005409583,0.0000073277606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030843852,0.0030557343,0.04170484,0.0012616889,0.00080648565,4.6159832e-7,0.33833706,0.00010307448,0.3092354,0.15188365,0.057882506,0.09542065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038060711,0.004054528,0.3011912,0.0006041159,0.0009020418,0.000038251186,0.28856543,0.0025466944,0.023895321,0.3337881,0.038096182,0.0025120436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051828725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015734124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28534007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010050351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115080795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505143777","doi":"","title":"Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?: Susan Moller Okin with Respondents","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.02843794178208949,"score_gpt":0.308119923631044,"score_spread":0.27968198184895454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505143777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243435,0.0002335421,4.794835e-7,0.0026550146,0.00018811686,0.00048068445,0.000056294793,0.0000398227,0.0720025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8885792,0.00036959065,0.00006259109,0.001792961,0.00016692354,0.00041288236,0.0000052781584,0.00001377885,0.10859682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840313,0.000062132494,0.00015155964,0.0002759911,0.00028189184,0.00082528766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990203,0.00008341501,0.000043218773,0.00014284757,0.00023447306,0.00047578607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032271334,0.00015549996,0.00021822413,0.0001343348,0.0011175828,0.00009634397,0.00018978902,0.00007439615,0.00084443245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121633246,0.00012289162,0.000041723615,0.00029374534,0.00035134077,0.00017003318,0.000009340958,0.000054971897,0.00007467243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017538347,0.000035461784,0.001447061,0.00004509735,0.00028217607,0.000030125675,0.89186215,0.000016836171,0.00002049774,0.011506725,0.090256914,0.0043215877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013275512,0.00021153326,0.0020805835,0.000038310955,0.000024791889,0.0000012431466,0.56693107,0.00000754027,0.000025878704,0.014477223,0.41445053,0.00042377188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022107165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25280747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3249311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015116791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003392778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514129879","doi":"10.2979/aft.2008.54.3.144","title":"<i>Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in a Comparative Perspective</i>, David Turton, ed.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa Today","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Ethnic group; Politics; Restructuring; Political science; Government (linguistics); Comparative politics; Sociology; Dual federalism; Development economics; Political economy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.14980684495708055,"score_gpt":0.38728441280760334,"score_spread":0.2374775678505228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514129879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24332517,0.00276367,0.0001017083,0.0156110125,0.00035252504,0.00046313048,0.0000025771317,0.00008777559,0.7372924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944967,0.0009377236,0.0000929753,0.00042148793,0.00015766325,0.00007506071,0.0000012653002,0.000006276653,0.0038108402],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983517,0.0003908473,0.00018388186,0.0002727342,0.0004422361,0.0003585982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923223,0.0002542198,0.000073664785,0.00020742632,0.00014508817,0.000087345215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032692624,0.000118362776,0.00016383214,0.000059651404,0.00093263824,0.000059081085,0.00039177202,0.000090444664,0.00010293269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021987782,0.00008651362,0.000066260465,0.0005631203,0.00080041896,0.00025144234,0.00004489715,0.00021652732,0.00009433705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012356198,0.000065065455,0.00090498367,9.678688e-7,0.000004355123,0.000012706897,0.8363627,0.0000151356935,0.00016819286,0.14246355,0.019847536,0.00014240718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009903952,0.00013840909,0.04926814,0.000044726963,0.000018158871,0.000015476051,0.75452197,0.00012074647,0.0006636101,0.0657018,0.12791693,0.00059963303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02324413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01242231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7511715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020950758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017640548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98326015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535705846","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199253623.001.0001","title":"Religious Freedom in the Liberal State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Religious persecution; Religious freedom; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Autonomy; Freedom of religion; Convention; Religious identity; Persecution; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.01698543093061049,"score_gpt":0.287088133275967,"score_spread":0.2701027023453565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535705846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062295105,0.0011593205,0.00002777873,0.0033634019,0.00039648043,0.00048153178,0.0000077476325,0.000088159075,0.99441326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004644732,0.004508463,0.00013998643,0.001221157,0.0013176501,0.000025081576,0.000037633126,0.00002190281,0.9880834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815917,0.00018227084,0.0002988386,0.0002621803,0.0007358954,0.00036166367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924886,0.00020829187,0.00012115448,0.00028537255,0.00007151979,0.000064785054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087671605,0.000183458,0.00020683378,0.00014716797,0.00021049926,0.0001909562,0.0006508844,0.0002867318,0.00020552157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007407072,0.00012753988,0.00012362615,0.00013048018,0.00032825992,0.00012128394,0.00003493574,0.00034080693,0.0004522297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040259024,0.000018906487,0.000017616994,0.0000045664547,0.0000042087054,0.000013576393,0.01639249,0.000024359075,1.298892e-7,0.17833689,0.80057883,0.0046043866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016947588,0.000020780635,0.00005767256,0.000026001164,0.000013323899,0.0000011233361,0.0007154714,0.000011155205,2.3245485e-7,0.2384549,0.76035297,0.00017687865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014658552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13110459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11644603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030323662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007438581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99190295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542646315","doi":"","title":"Catholic Social Teaching and Global Migration: Bridging the Paradox of Universal Human Rights and Territorial Self-Determination","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Democracy; Globe; Immigration; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Emigration; Sociology; Christianity; Political economy; Law; Geography; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.01273899358870661,"score_gpt":0.2861739003272085,"score_spread":0.2734349067385019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542646315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6713761,0.0075187027,0.00034877684,0.019736651,0.0005300451,0.0013088124,0.000038735077,0.0002328451,0.29890934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806315,0.0012863786,0.00012925171,0.00009599422,0.00026427378,1.2890679e-7,0.000006887594,0.0000013392463,0.00015260532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917316,0.00032744545,0.000088198125,0.00012495978,0.00018317583,0.0001030593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997159,0.000033486387,0.00008936158,0.00006323632,0.000055760273,0.00004220668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039471372,0.00006656847,0.00013299557,0.000018895444,0.0016172631,0.000036061218,0.00011363976,0.00004968686,0.0000033884655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001457825,0.000058308447,0.00004379465,0.00010054512,0.00023327893,0.00027005642,0.000022927488,0.00007428725,7.082237e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004868955,0.000028901073,0.00014684309,0.0000966679,0.0000070125448,0.0000044794406,0.006430781,1.17946904e-7,0.000014714406,0.9814905,0.0018491874,0.009925909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012522119,0.00017767493,0.0098497905,0.00083816063,0.0006372094,0.00001286564,0.00198842,0.00007139045,0.000020832547,0.024580956,0.9601533,0.00041722902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018155418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010793569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95830405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115002644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029857554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549533466","doi":"","title":"Gender Equality Versus Minority Inclusion: The Political Dilemma of Religious Arbitration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Law; Religious law; Inclusion (mineral); Dispute resolution; Religious freedom; Dilemma; Sociology; Gender studies; Islam; Geography","score_opus":0.03107506659729873,"score_gpt":0.33250604236237763,"score_spread":0.3014309757650789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549533466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49518287,0.003285007,0.004591681,0.02588654,0.0008612548,0.0003582092,0.0000037491263,0.00006693438,0.46976376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713033,0.0016281386,0.000032336655,0.00036958896,0.0007252137,0.000001283457,0.0000026389653,0.0000037106734,0.00010673182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709123,0.0003805779,0.00030985585,0.00013002852,0.00071128143,0.0013769988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921834,0.00013800866,0.00016919829,0.0001489911,0.00021564926,0.00010983414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029495636,0.00009397206,0.0001279278,0.00005411265,0.0011029416,0.000055242162,0.00034592595,0.000110137444,0.000013485797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039634405,0.000068229776,0.00012846915,0.00020495828,0.00020210378,0.00017961273,0.000045862063,0.0007337308,0.0000052846613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009494265,0.000063493135,0.00026038996,0.0000015751693,0.000017730928,7.1779795e-7,0.00257582,0.0000042393563,0.000101064106,0.9925792,0.0003158107,0.00398501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005505785,0.00027444924,0.0014307715,0.000003529037,0.000043814583,0.000014210231,0.007609363,0.000019480734,0.00007745418,0.9889447,0.0009443648,0.000087301145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008082368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013272478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50194746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008683508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024608236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555603385","doi":"","title":"Religious Arbitration in Canada: Protecting Women by Protecting Them from Religion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022378622116247346,"score_gpt":0.2173995701327661,"score_spread":0.19502094801651876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555603385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64133984,0.000003870194,0.00023119088,0.00019257359,0.00011726632,0.0008748244,0.000009998589,0.00011931075,0.35711113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97260046,0.026820611,0.00025745557,0.00011265006,0.000111834335,0.000022439086,0.000016064823,0.00001956334,0.000038947008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997729,0.0005112453,0.00024462168,0.0004501275,0.00050754845,0.0005574788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991505,0.00018328575,0.00021520452,0.0002076794,0.00012627363,0.00011703905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004827992,0.00019024835,0.00022381678,0.0017155322,0.0010088644,0.000046372876,0.0003345043,0.00015150387,0.000012839292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042691806,0.00021880871,0.000053066564,0.004475994,0.00010179424,0.0004598967,0.000062215506,0.0004454482,0.000009973672],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088717684,0.00059867627,0.054074157,0.00012413353,0.00014485221,0.0012949941,0.88169765,0.00026663262,0.00090203586,0.007146281,0.010516718,0.042346694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019279225,0.00011507999,0.0006932134,0.00013115477,0.000027760841,0.000010398309,0.064210795,0.00037418518,0.0022951353,0.000185982,0.92925096,0.00077741395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99957335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91873425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037455498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004023301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97944826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","score_opus":0.054627436617493065,"score_gpt":0.31406249022491767,"score_spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586913609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6179782,0.00086526026,0.00018520677,0.01498363,0.00087889895,0.00024066074,0.0000017480503,0.000011920935,0.36485445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987188,0.00008597858,0.000036144065,0.00017706139,0.00088368554,0.0000038747835,3.0833513e-7,0.00000407739,0.00009010143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989571,0.00030719742,0.00017794933,0.000044368113,0.0003040191,0.0002093496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940026,0.00027318,0.00016832224,0.00006295413,0.000054567598,0.00004073106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025698212,0.0000480609,0.00005787886,0.000022770948,0.0014182994,0.00015260525,0.00024196816,0.00003320785,0.0000025633217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003318396,0.000023431785,0.000039405542,0.000106285384,0.00058163004,0.00023168701,0.000044596316,0.00018115164,6.0049405e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008942824,0.000015937032,0.0038586478,0.0000017855868,0.000008428777,1.9029055e-7,0.027536154,0.00003055093,0.00013236616,0.9652497,0.00007858984,0.003078663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027929798,0.00009937792,0.16422594,0.0006480556,0.00013173418,0.00039872757,0.27623412,0.002479855,0.0025897701,0.52670443,0.023195447,0.0004995744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007141264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008501899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43854532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007305739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004553969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590246975","doi":"","title":"Coaching bivocational ministers for greater ministry effectiveness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Coaching; Political science; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.023425661144968333,"score_gpt":0.29521238792467147,"score_spread":0.2717867267797031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590246975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336862,0.000008233529,0.002372775,0.0005459613,0.0008894918,0.00026115478,0.000016223927,0.0000941439,0.062125847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911176,0.0000020974244,0.002010463,0.00009325448,0.00015166862,0.0000019332915,0.00001966443,0.0000125757615,0.00659072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894476,0.00015297596,0.00009732348,0.0002857375,0.0002313151,0.00028786538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915344,0.000264981,0.00008221111,0.00015947451,0.00019899591,0.0001408979],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073103356,0.00011090308,0.00011658193,0.00017307834,0.0028922688,0.0007555321,0.0003072489,0.00018403452,0.00002840653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002727318,0.000120998935,0.00011349228,0.00027508417,0.00075805956,0.00078585173,0.00003997158,0.00022484058,0.000012989931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081886427,0.0003478257,0.17570093,0.00020840332,0.00013541794,0.00006916789,0.04230526,0.000052376392,0.07460064,0.6742739,0.0022185089,0.02926871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061243963,0.00018929454,0.22199018,0.00024349993,0.00029427136,0.000020608832,0.012131192,0.00033131696,0.01044436,0.02237263,0.7243825,0.001475716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097063446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011123157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72216403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012378795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043491248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599675491","doi":"","title":"Eweida v United Kingdom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Freedom of religion; Religious freedom; Kingdom; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Accommodation; Political science; Clothing; High Court; Sociology; History; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.04548782921124649,"score_gpt":0.3187942160396319,"score_spread":0.2733063868283854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599675491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16016296,0.000007702939,0.00058233965,0.00288409,0.00014472716,0.00010482657,1.17671455e-7,0.00009855561,0.8360147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836652,0.000012489663,0.00038037528,0.00057614973,0.00010611534,0.000009153083,0.0000027731096,0.0000025200568,0.015245177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995665,0.000038403792,0.00005680228,0.00006213856,0.00014972227,0.00012643436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973935,0.000035390814,0.000015743013,0.000060369744,0.00008782525,0.00006132304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107164946,0.0000292274,0.000031687123,0.0000552537,0.00018149367,0.0000847679,0.00008889616,0.000036700094,0.002065704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008927481,0.000023642891,0.000018301966,0.0002075604,0.00007936181,0.00015099884,0.000009500371,0.00002302092,0.0011133088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9649624e-7,0.000009372564,0.0015808237,6.6642224e-7,0.0000012515112,1.9120328e-7,0.0013145407,0.0000012902397,0.000090013156,0.906521,0.087837346,0.0026432052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040493548,0.000035343648,0.017051324,0.000008683436,0.000011034016,4.2419734e-7,0.010766352,0.00043484595,0.0004211892,0.36882034,0.6017793,0.0002662727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17490928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00363007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8235023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020327787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026071119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1618917261","doi":"","title":"El tratamiento jurídico y político de la diversidad religiosa en Québec y Canadá","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Migraciones. Publicación del Instituto Universitario de Estudios sobre Migraciones","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Diversity (politics); Politics; Political science; Commission; Interculturalism; Welfare economics; Humanities; Geography; Public administration; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Multiculturalism; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007145560658882547,"score_gpt":0.2588630837279757,"score_spread":0.2517175230690931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1618917261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8558926,0.0035233106,0.001457735,0.055061642,0.0011570137,0.0022408245,0.00021330461,0.00079906476,0.0796545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984367,0.0062941457,0.0007379703,0.0011084923,0.0007782825,0.00016269769,0.00014494281,0.00010314771,0.0063032946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157673,0.0015563464,0.0010398206,0.0015882814,0.00175665,0.002482148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942001,0.000980549,0.0006851056,0.0011417215,0.0011650043,0.0018275256],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019254901,0.0012111488,0.0011227368,0.0015604229,0.0036611026,0.0015018348,0.002286733,0.0014869414,0.00038135407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012529597,0.0013187724,0.00084437075,0.0023839443,0.0021951052,0.0038397245,0.0007222346,0.0012717055,0.0009066965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002207223,0.0018823603,0.13263159,0.00026902492,0.00089174544,0.0005974765,0.075920984,0.00057006127,0.00041705425,0.5595191,0.20791477,0.019165108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037220493,0.00033440927,0.17987546,0.00031694726,0.0012688303,0.00022861254,0.06958436,0.0006359252,0.00011694872,0.004387603,0.73722273,0.0023061307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7790191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51893604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5551315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051666945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073953047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1674632769","doi":"","title":"Faith Based Arbitration in Ontario","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Sharia; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Faith; Judaism; State (computer science); Dispute resolution; Islam; Alternative dispute resolution; History; Theology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.012123558176166794,"score_gpt":0.26459910352147525,"score_spread":0.25247554534530847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1674632769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56050587,0.0009033148,0.008195872,0.008123484,0.00026708932,0.0002220383,3.0633805e-7,0.000046038378,0.421736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565214,0.00043060724,0.00017392571,0.00024647173,0.0002775689,0.0000030563795,0.0000021459095,0.0000050917065,0.0032089737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829775,0.0001002694,0.00016562472,0.00009385919,0.00028964106,0.0010528426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974954,0.000022756678,0.00007141797,0.000052091924,0.00004985887,0.0000543624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017631011,0.000060442962,0.00007060948,0.00011436585,0.00024656407,0.00007194484,0.00013303325,0.000063814005,0.00010064857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052001753,0.000057451736,0.000047934387,0.00013183826,0.00004219356,0.00029760718,0.0000034747825,0.0008096817,0.00002635066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031126783,0.00009416509,0.015130706,6.775287e-7,0.000007992085,0.0000015986507,0.0047590854,0.00045562867,0.0000693765,0.9537261,0.0003024502,0.02542106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016360425,0.00021435904,0.014780534,0.00002222877,0.000021318647,0.000018867793,0.008001371,0.0005086467,0.00010712742,0.9449296,0.029493941,0.000265957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23144811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7631023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031989515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071189245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17498086","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2516.2007.01466.x","title":"Canonization Practices and the Canadian Boikshelf.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays on Canadian writing","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Art; History","score_opus":0.019733273582217117,"score_gpt":0.29013631394639977,"score_spread":0.27040304036418267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17498086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042472754,0.00022785513,0.0000011497,0.03512799,0.000105529485,0.00022295292,0.0000112644,0.000022880371,0.92180765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931827,0.00023008487,0.00003124492,0.0032483826,0.00032207588,0.00001380513,0.000010632354,0.000009667604,0.0029513878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988627,0.00021701294,0.00012436144,0.00016517342,0.00022768341,0.00040307632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902904,0.00019839844,0.000077960285,0.00010918665,0.00007709941,0.00050832226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010798533,0.00007483551,0.00007770494,0.00013378421,0.0025616281,0.00046686828,0.0001470906,0.00008949992,0.0005826745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006946844,0.000065281456,0.000020713742,0.00023900051,0.0002859672,0.00021507766,0.000002844529,0.00012782082,0.00007594248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009922118,0.0000039687275,0.0048774392,0.0000049056434,0.000008155451,0.000023353403,0.01119452,0.00004663817,8.396804e-7,0.9073802,0.009159729,0.06729029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017391288,0.00004575618,0.017808871,0.0001132888,0.00006972725,0.000018268729,0.025481692,0.0014354647,0.00001424304,0.050913792,0.9017457,0.0006140815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99918556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95070994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042589658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001894263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882741937","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139013789.011","title":"Political Liberalism, Islamic Family Law, and Family Law Pluralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Israeli law; Sharia; Politics; Islam; Religious law; Comparative law; Sociology; Private law; Black letter law; Legal realism; History","score_opus":0.033497423835823215,"score_gpt":0.23300911720811548,"score_spread":0.19951169337229227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882741937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052702747,0.0003430255,0.00004990308,0.00009114176,0.00043132168,0.0004386461,0.00020927469,0.00020897403,0.9977007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103969865,0.00028428703,0.000048609898,0.0015099697,0.00031023825,9.81018e-7,0.000045499924,0.00004424905,0.8937863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805546,0.00011735854,0.00021818241,0.0005706445,0.00045920716,0.0005791205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880666,0.000093643546,0.00016082487,0.00038473992,0.000226928,0.00032719725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017669862,0.00037310336,0.0004205298,0.0001333904,0.0007446521,0.00014124544,0.0005174199,0.0007007469,0.000004998734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009600681,0.00043706998,0.00020349742,0.000010094221,0.0023426802,0.00023552625,0.0002817576,0.00039796118,0.00002527571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035509416,0.000008987871,7.825793e-7,0.000027645912,0.000050461313,0.00011751961,0.0010504922,3.9537266e-8,0.000026287584,0.9773934,0.021101156,0.00018770785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057267264,0.000052118627,0.000029337609,0.00011622126,0.00026878974,0.000004810374,0.0007034122,0.0000025987679,0.000037358914,0.025800211,0.9718144,0.0005981007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107461184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010379057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026977895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017365326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983103512","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs031","title":"Britain's Religious Tribunals: 'Joint Governance' in Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Transformative learning; Accommodation; Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Tribunal; Political science; Corporate governance; Archbishop; Theology; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.047161122174245305,"score_gpt":0.36973777557530374,"score_spread":0.32257665340105846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983103512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20746134,0.19544643,0.00017394219,0.035238694,0.0034301647,0.0003174811,0.000004099293,0.00003289478,0.55789495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916918,0.080602236,0.000703284,0.00041944374,0.0009155806,0.000003447205,1.7649387e-7,0.0000074260975,0.0004304434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998021,0.0002614572,0.0005377957,0.000083592306,0.000694208,0.00040193787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982443,0.0003706953,0.00063807814,0.000074816235,0.0005452242,0.0001269128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030525855,0.00010862105,0.00032694597,0.00008819318,0.0002546164,0.000071806615,0.0001696478,0.00005356611,0.000008036486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052540232,0.00008854563,0.00012961251,0.0002911636,0.00021207385,0.0014824398,0.00004617517,0.00024246833,0.000006888739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045928778,0.0008753174,0.030135464,0.00006249407,0.00044955022,0.0002949347,0.12567836,0.000061919825,0.0000846576,0.56855565,0.2285011,0.04484125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008846524,0.00020272903,0.007429712,0.00014718148,0.000107969136,0.000085506625,0.05681543,0.0000010430288,0.00006249764,0.01144486,0.9226431,0.00017526295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032901713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019394815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7094566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041624333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016764726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62899363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991718069","doi":"10.7202/1008036ar","title":"Beyond Objective and Subjective: Assessing the Legitimacy of Religious Claims to Accommodation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Reinterpretation; Argument (complex analysis); Disadvantage; Normative; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Accommodation; Law; Law and economics; Plaintiff; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01931340330095821,"score_gpt":0.33976955187325747,"score_spread":0.32045614857229926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991718069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77591616,0.00067696214,0.0064592375,0.002274438,0.00023003486,0.000445723,0.0000034090322,0.00005120438,0.21394281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742794,0.00037408192,0.0011931518,0.0006562177,0.00023299687,0.000029400153,0.0000034648615,0.000011830392,0.0000709386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987776,0.00037480955,0.00016355654,0.00013952662,0.00023309783,0.0003113735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991598,0.00031328257,0.00011134084,0.00013482959,0.00015724695,0.00012346933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012553592,0.00009575805,0.00012545023,0.000081361504,0.00048222515,0.0001095798,0.00015716477,0.00015630537,0.0000075156595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004126775,0.00007709014,0.00004438967,0.00025539476,0.00028985256,0.0004235934,0.000047782447,0.000176797,0.000005754079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004742606,0.00010111147,0.1093971,0.000036860183,0.000042855885,0.0000019600338,0.24351168,0.00015157288,0.004698545,0.6026491,0.0034597258,0.035902083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006920812,0.00014946244,0.34872878,0.00011828235,0.00012417452,0.000019437155,0.13923623,0.0002355166,0.012956519,0.49270782,0.0044498295,0.0005818548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011552609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015287878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23933168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018756698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011517595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99502957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020443408","doi":"10.1080/11926422.2014.934863","title":"Canada's Office of Religious Freedom: notes for a genealogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Foreign Policy Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Geopolitics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Politics; Ottoman empire; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.017988532997597777,"score_gpt":0.27843815776305836,"score_spread":0.2604496247654606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020443408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007733949,0.00038684387,0.0027441967,0.006249887,0.00029201971,0.0003583292,0.00019833288,0.000016221564,0.9820202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950276,0.00012541938,0.0006244077,0.0020323142,0.0018178488,0.0000072262465,0.000010512574,0.000017802777,0.00033686653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984883,0.00011174844,0.0003167745,0.00013075126,0.0003012279,0.00065117574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997994,0.0003375228,0.00020673664,0.00014643253,0.00040920722,0.0009060919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006673842,0.0001103454,0.00020329405,0.0003637878,0.0006488457,0.00006691266,0.0003707099,0.00012179693,0.00003569635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027965738,0.00011161091,0.00010491965,0.0002492763,0.00021993427,0.00007735578,0.000008396599,0.000116869014,0.0000032337555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009912496,0.000004305373,0.0006500173,0.000008308959,0.000014269481,0.000003953309,0.0006648224,0.00010274616,0.000019479095,0.85184073,0.14424156,0.0024398947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078067835,0.00014733273,0.0018859442,0.000027659778,0.00004162395,0.00005772878,0.00087343546,0.00019853642,0.00011860492,0.66757095,0.3280423,0.00025520497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99856627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98729366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008707823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015914233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202991644","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139104173","title":"Religion, Charity and Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Legislation; Abortion; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018520079173860768,"score_gpt":0.23904843466427786,"score_spread":0.2205283554904171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202991644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044527918,0.00010062402,0.000103757084,0.000037616086,0.00024240694,0.00035530466,0.0000327532,0.00015989592,0.99852234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012128659,0.000090448346,0.00001970123,0.000051818377,0.0004320925,7.0116755e-7,0.000058300724,0.000015464624,0.9872028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986033,0.00017552356,0.00014107424,0.00042970513,0.0003665992,0.00028379352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901223,0.00006913709,0.0001895265,0.00030625836,0.00019012143,0.00023275291],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002773625,0.00022042703,0.00029281082,0.00015186165,0.0014798134,0.00009405731,0.00040758212,0.0004901857,0.0000021740996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014532216,0.0002551256,0.000111285226,0.000012917335,0.0008018665,0.000098895056,0.00015946539,0.00028196853,0.0000122221445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060361854,0.0000045134043,0.0000038929325,0.000027470784,0.00001274865,0.000017485265,0.00026331452,3.982917e-8,0.0000027855428,0.6144735,0.38511342,0.00007479525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032970245,0.000032318076,0.000041437015,0.00008321243,0.00012656502,0.000001494125,0.00004421944,0.0000025097872,0.000018766339,0.0019989298,0.99701595,0.0003049186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030687077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018265595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61247456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002954404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001741697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030039118","doi":"10.1177/002096430405800304","title":"The Righteousness of the Law and the Righteousness of Faith in Romans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Righteousness; Faith; Philosophy; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0040865069613479355,"score_gpt":0.25399765730473217,"score_spread":0.24991115034338424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030039118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321545,0.0023588184,0.0022683495,0.007848068,0.00040249314,0.00019414803,0.0000013853861,0.0000027309777,0.054769527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987317,0.0009777969,0.00003352602,0.00017685199,0.000028636696,0.0000022557376,9.309997e-8,0.000002573011,0.00004658852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989235,0.0004028974,0.0003467471,0.0000554036,0.00017601454,0.00009545827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877423,0.0005462768,0.00040577963,0.00008005926,0.00017178405,0.000021854175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011791553,0.000052778156,0.0001684207,0.000099231765,0.00021227071,0.000028774224,0.0002282263,0.00005453356,0.000006549869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016535731,0.000022424047,0.000060940918,0.00022591531,0.0017788493,0.00012106826,0.000029167477,0.00010817693,2.6900466e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002410313,0.000023926432,0.0009004189,0.000007472143,0.000021631213,0.000001543333,0.035134487,0.000105673505,0.00012256319,0.9623286,0.000018122686,0.0010945455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016197445,0.00012650825,0.0036189451,0.000103074286,0.00004361085,0.000041736523,0.008935779,0.00014416163,0.0012926051,0.98374546,0.00028496378,0.000043432392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003875495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014045307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0665772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015817535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085448075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78376114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035467982","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000177","title":"Multiculturalism meets privatisation: the case of faith-based arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law; Multiculturalism; Religious law; Family law; Supreme court; Faith; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law and economics; Islam","score_opus":0.03095093799431146,"score_gpt":0.3302311450385649,"score_spread":0.2992802070442534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035467982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268641,0.00029995828,0.0005065766,0.031998206,0.0012575582,0.0003211799,0.000004707743,0.000007994599,0.038739737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983106,0.0000382199,0.0004482812,0.0008635804,0.0002532761,0.000007062492,0.0000021363724,0.00000331773,0.00007351783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988004,0.00016291892,0.00046329378,0.000060723632,0.00042948197,0.000083193656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979257,0.00032615932,0.00043583717,0.00006140903,0.0012114742,0.000039450562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005695582,0.000058396887,0.00010357163,0.000074443975,0.000089331545,0.00010637886,0.00030194776,0.000051395447,0.00014192777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038563626,0.000038735434,0.000078989935,0.00007697943,0.00022939082,0.00050193444,0.00001199861,0.00010302549,0.000007874789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004531494,0.00013982812,0.00078710675,0.0000055871214,0.000050562598,0.00015902886,0.030984838,0.00046726377,0.0019030086,0.9417771,0.001942775,0.021737568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024460936,0.001204147,0.055975698,0.0020903072,0.00030795526,0.0025662133,0.21422581,0.02429263,0.04537656,0.47458693,0.15314254,0.0017702539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039771598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031696558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46719018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106671854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010447052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98597246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055456844","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.62","title":"Prejudice Unveiled: The Niqab in Court–","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Multiculturalism; Political science; Prejudice (legal term); Mythology; Islam; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013154296934794954,"score_gpt":0.26007015686746193,"score_spread":0.246915859932667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055456844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6389857,0.0013325815,0.00019231552,0.021127665,0.0012183937,0.00029071313,0.000020621335,0.0000117687205,0.33682021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299026,0.00048509834,0.000081367325,0.004939604,0.00046979543,0.0000043808545,0.0000026713801,0.000014356437,0.0010124869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985462,0.0002492697,0.00034443743,0.00015326458,0.00013903278,0.0005678089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982152,0.0003185911,0.0002220804,0.00014807486,0.00023961923,0.0008564412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027804838,0.00011992588,0.00026028397,0.0000634784,0.0007977591,0.00016236809,0.00035852325,0.00017274352,0.00005370181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003882833,0.000108663735,0.00018661025,0.000227437,0.00072883384,0.00026446782,0.000010762223,0.00038632922,0.0000022445365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029356627,0.000007021304,0.0008075173,0.00001782311,0.00002596738,0.000018425979,0.11204573,0.000032093212,0.000007089816,0.87616485,0.008638108,0.0022324151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017279687,0.00020946887,0.009877697,0.00026886733,0.00013230393,0.000114340444,0.1833391,0.0004715745,0.000010779075,0.28383672,0.51946324,0.0005479189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54069847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9751526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59232813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000647784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012048958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61357987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W205819075","doi":"10.5250/fronjwomestud.34.2.0134","title":"The Question of Muslim Women's Rights and the Ontario Shari'ah Tribunals: Examining Liberal Claims","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers A Journal of Women Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01992378099291489,"score_gpt":0.2871852257690191,"score_spread":0.26726144477610425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W205819075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98819745,0.0057782084,0.00010877553,0.00168589,0.0009148634,0.00022893291,6.026431e-7,0.0000063995544,0.0030788523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929924,0.0026566994,0.00024145648,0.000080455575,0.00023196929,0.0000407997,1.5723765e-7,0.000004826815,0.003751224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981981,0.00039877152,0.00046640827,0.00009598142,0.0004777983,0.00036295014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983309,0.00041665332,0.00056705193,0.000093090865,0.0004826257,0.0001096793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036627036,0.00011133494,0.00039365204,0.00008417829,0.001000276,0.00015121128,0.00024772674,0.00004999316,0.000018527786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040447307,0.00005402983,0.00006856597,0.00013489288,0.0011356542,0.00038627366,0.00005416248,0.00017879996,0.0000012637831],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019800753,0.000034668483,0.0053715734,0.000010651636,0.0004736509,0.0000027298152,0.9559169,0.000005717647,0.00000993488,0.0071380474,0.025572602,0.005265547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015934454,0.00031222642,0.0103197,0.000063959975,0.00006311364,0.000004514325,0.615646,0.000016779304,0.000008784129,0.3650017,0.006865774,0.000103985694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007034256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006966439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35786363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007607416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001386333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063112049","doi":"10.7202/1008034ar","title":"Nationalism, Secularism and Liberal Neutrality: The Danish Case of Judges and Religious Symbols","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Neutrality; Nationalism; Law; Parliament; Political science; Danish; Politics; Islam; Separation of church and state; Mainstream; Legislation; State (computer science); Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.018456475609155004,"score_gpt":0.3012128706937708,"score_spread":0.2827563950846158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063112049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96353614,0.0031249092,0.00015402935,0.005142635,0.000103316044,0.00022193677,0.000006931397,0.000033526067,0.027676562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966394,0.0016135314,0.000316199,0.0010882192,0.0001562067,0.000013693884,0.000004089547,0.0000085706015,0.00016013344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990603,0.00027922896,0.0001504929,0.000117067524,0.0001577276,0.00023522876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994375,0.00017114959,0.000080344624,0.00010467046,0.00008498251,0.000121322955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010058372,0.00008305386,0.00010852669,0.00003709852,0.000368616,0.00007408936,0.00008741612,0.00018396675,0.000006448944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019187327,0.00006541182,0.000035972644,0.00009498575,0.0004688667,0.00017583434,0.000038753453,0.00014865898,0.000001048586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010662228,0.000027581365,0.024306929,0.000041103147,0.000026685799,0.00003370654,0.093906485,0.000008108397,0.0002904798,0.8736605,0.004966402,0.002721324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011503281,0.00012066717,0.049129147,0.00008410404,0.000257797,0.0015183464,0.08670497,0.00026385175,0.002394067,0.840073,0.017580666,0.0007230857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013646547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024214697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033587564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046776502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005115564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99292165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105475502","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-41821-6_30","title":"Faith in Law? Diffusing Tensions Between Diversity and Equality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Philosophy and politics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Faith; Obligation; Separation of church and state; Realm; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11529711040852335,"score_gpt":0.31320111606263185,"score_spread":0.19790400565410848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105475502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006197526,0.0003657164,0.000021246577,0.002530541,0.0001021892,0.00013848512,0.00015204326,0.000026031159,0.99046624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812217,0.0007371693,0.000018827754,0.00035488582,0.0009720069,6.283207e-7,0.000010385207,0.00001030554,0.016674101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909914,0.000050390805,0.0001678155,0.00022051958,0.0002339851,0.0002281762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934727,0.00021576446,0.00008641706,0.0001136423,0.000060429044,0.00017650223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022343778,0.00014645212,0.0002402003,0.00008498394,0.0011402657,0.00003350513,0.00008829038,0.00027667804,0.000013374249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004089994,0.0001282505,0.000044389577,0.000015212709,0.0010378363,0.00010386377,0.00029285366,0.00015264947,0.000006426286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019248387,0.000005481679,0.0032157635,0.000027189975,0.0000090293,0.0000035352145,0.0038929242,1.2393273e-8,2.711724e-7,0.99240535,0.00004461225,0.00039389645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020562357,0.000017611073,0.0012878411,0.00013748459,0.000056601562,4.5455926e-7,0.00007572364,3.4847346e-7,6.01544e-7,0.9846358,0.013404171,0.00017776323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058630165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095534587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97502416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006957461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004144822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88631666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115370753","doi":"10.1017/s0008197313000718","title":"THE GOD “DILUTION”? RELIGION, DISCRIMINATION AND THE CASE FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Normative; Reasonable accommodation; Disadvantage; Compromise; Religious discrimination; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.014983419445327386,"score_gpt":0.2772541085213401,"score_spread":0.2622706890760127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115370753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14594972,0.0056108385,0.012599507,0.4755689,0.0023637663,0.0038737052,0.000021839254,0.00011318884,0.35389853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946193,0.002049754,0.00009024959,0.00062762445,0.0007491731,0.00011654106,0.0000051914394,0.0000099470735,0.0017321857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985365,0.0005156606,0.00026639318,0.0001097717,0.00028677302,0.00028487376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814385,0.0009221359,0.00023486858,0.00019731546,0.00041754768,0.00008425769],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034019,0.000094924835,0.00009811346,0.000020955773,0.008375708,0.0010588635,0.00030739227,0.0000563122,0.000008026854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005167435,0.000042017436,0.00009005895,0.00011854135,0.0009118352,0.00056136935,0.000041479332,0.00018292568,0.000013077693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039773917,0.000008901198,0.000015876512,0.0000030088395,0.000011462845,0.000002395515,0.002088525,0.000009367517,0.000010998285,0.9001665,0.08682735,0.01081585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026804619,0.000085544045,0.0015496153,0.00004341908,0.00022252348,0.0015027219,0.03677394,0.004740483,0.000074270305,0.77729666,0.17477348,0.00025689363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04144673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01658249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009961161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006497329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012421256337278697,"score_gpt":0.2969896724442739,"score_spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125280111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073259342,0.0010467363,0.004740687,0.12412854,0.0006039201,0.00033076337,0.0000073264623,0.000069076166,0.861747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965502,0.00021635357,0.00019257976,0.0006016448,0.0010530439,0.000002388075,0.0000010592817,0.000008478814,0.0013742683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821913,0.00042055573,0.00023796382,0.00009931982,0.0006431658,0.0003798453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.0005209741,0.00009802359,0.00013198932,0.00011650095,0.00024863848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589627,0.00008576108,0.00008938795,0.000011013381,0.0045120656,0.0004655435,0.00043383215,0.00006961484,0.00010798659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004505281,0.000039421382,0.000079309604,0.00010768797,0.0008958129,0.00014540803,0.000034008746,0.00035173478,0.00005169997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030651794,0.00006214322,0.000043229065,8.323627e-7,0.0000080241725,0.0000057473126,0.0015111519,0.000011077807,0.00013259462,0.8546433,0.10337166,0.040179625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003685576,0.0000801908,0.00036465735,0.000020511747,0.000027279388,0.00005203041,0.003134312,0.00042150088,0.00032720342,0.050935257,0.9441536,0.000114884446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013795525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062436513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98922426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011404419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129410355","doi":"10.1093/ojlr/rws005","title":"How Religious Arbitration Could Enhance Personal Autonomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Autonomy; Religious freedom; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Law and economics; Law; State (computer science); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.01715009676357333,"score_gpt":0.2908915983203651,"score_spread":0.2737415015567918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129410355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35027528,0.020992734,0.005835715,0.011516766,0.0022457638,0.00027689643,0.0000023847115,0.000043852502,0.6088106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835111,0.013350636,0.00055250624,0.000681782,0.0011674184,0.0000019352153,0.0000017266539,0.000008487462,0.0007244432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988672,0.00009317246,0.00025075136,0.0000912228,0.00042080504,0.00027686357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991242,0.000063323525,0.00032127663,0.000059363614,0.00020910696,0.0002227173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007633776,0.00010297768,0.00016921315,0.00007415436,0.00038009344,0.00016568208,0.0000999541,0.00014229883,0.000004814592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007242721,0.00008259741,0.00010203591,0.00008926367,0.00022256718,0.00080579246,0.000012697875,0.00018262424,0.0000022917002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010315705,0.00013067317,0.0019091871,0.00003459799,0.000037822527,0.000010855098,0.026173804,0.0000020399716,0.0024726929,0.94660574,0.014430992,0.008088408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005797619,0.00026784933,0.00039229763,0.00010300706,0.00009008557,0.000107860345,0.0021456673,0.000026851914,0.0022362694,0.035867147,0.9579432,0.00023999775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008012029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024325146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010531178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016148335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33682248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143688148","doi":"10.1093/icon/mos048","title":"Religious law as foreign law in constitutional interpretation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013054255779701764,"score_gpt":0.3055705611410323,"score_spread":0.29251630536133055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143688148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008978325,0.0004083825,0.0083297845,0.0047165607,0.0023046166,0.00028711997,0.000022281138,0.000032192856,0.97492075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939836,0.00016682727,0.001084521,0.0038206126,0.00072603126,0.000020474601,0.000031697793,0.000005985219,0.00016022277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705887,0.0001695077,0.0008420012,0.00019768396,0.0014566237,0.00027531566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703777,0.00033205305,0.00043733968,0.00009694126,0.0019017257,0.00019420138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075703405,0.00016649385,0.00024217044,0.00025500244,0.00030974485,0.00032783655,0.00060354476,0.00015892701,0.00063204253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036791115,0.00015967076,0.00020341697,0.00015387112,0.0066151996,0.0017620067,0.0000521468,0.00029022145,0.00032252655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010889457,0.00013898894,0.00062517513,0.000003364955,0.000070739625,0.000092414644,0.0006858109,0.0007245245,0.00019173592,0.99456704,0.0023495548,0.00044173526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013156781,0.000070641414,0.0001852654,0.00019227139,0.00002272948,0.00033106012,0.00082769274,0.00012317511,0.00029006196,0.8757963,0.12063893,0.00020615973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018264767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004682185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055395195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010126872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144764777","doi":"","title":"Canada: Dignity in Diversity? A Reflection","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insights (Essays)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Diversity (politics); Reflection (computer programming); Geography; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0731572997856404,"score_gpt":0.2740758707257618,"score_spread":0.2009185709401214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144764777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2318609,0.00006690418,0.000112514936,0.00017538984,0.0003949033,0.00010710801,0.0000012415131,0.000035314257,0.7672457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984163,0.00006484881,0.00004254825,0.00018449783,0.00008524147,0.0000049036503,0.000002143509,0.0000036621313,0.001195873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991306,0.00011688655,0.00010875529,0.00014823268,0.00031018892,0.00018534984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999673,0.000031511725,0.000046589867,0.00009476241,0.00007421953,0.000079931124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017294163,0.00006339209,0.000083068684,0.00008964955,0.00052755786,0.000019413545,0.00016489191,0.00007689821,0.000073727366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008614176,0.00005935572,0.000022596292,0.00028592919,0.0000942245,0.00025435459,0.00006131292,0.00008669007,0.00001781818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052080373,0.00022907158,0.052281708,0.000011404129,0.000012948197,0.000102284466,0.1191497,0.000003065803,0.00012237267,0.8072219,0.01716113,0.0036523296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012869487,0.00008969627,0.17013627,0.000048789778,0.00003999557,0.0000021308017,0.016129855,0.00004168708,0.0013163873,0.75892293,0.051410012,0.0005752683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99301034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76655537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035154013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047409098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40576017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152695323","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778937","title":"Liberalism, Group Rights and the Boundaries of Toleration: The Case of Minority Religious Schools in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Public administration; Toleration; Flourishing; Political science; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Liberalism; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.015023556444042454,"score_gpt":0.26731162320920276,"score_spread":0.2522880667651603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152695323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95930415,0.00029272752,0.000028241071,0.003963584,0.0002692236,0.00010857728,0.0000020903742,7.8192784e-7,0.03603065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995383,0.000004239596,0.0001340744,0.00018401287,0.000043648703,8.404001e-7,6.3908395e-8,9.0923413e-7,0.00009388832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872166,0.000222926,0.00032024604,0.000081588856,0.00028419835,0.00036937767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879616,0.000196662,0.00012847055,0.000103686754,0.00029448033,0.000480529],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027236058,0.000052010353,0.00014088319,0.00011909454,0.00080422964,0.0002436901,0.00026749424,0.000040497096,0.000024089688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001379307,0.000029363866,0.00004257433,0.0003355508,0.0066885143,0.00028566754,0.000007801592,0.00018320403,3.9685668e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048989423,0.00000554596,0.006328449,0.0000019053053,0.0000016000737,0.00005974074,0.011870524,0.0000018101395,0.0000057092843,0.9813501,0.00031565028,0.00005404036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006837654,0.00008978924,0.052805994,0.000041247808,0.000028296296,0.00050019316,0.009042749,0.00001636976,0.00018373577,0.9319423,0.0045764386,0.00008911533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98257774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99583936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049407817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037173653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061361566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153447884","doi":"10.3138/tjt.25.2.239","title":"Beyond Secularism? Rethinking the “Secular” in a Religiously Plural Context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Secularity; Secularization; Sociology; Ideology; Neutrality; Secular state; Context (archaeology); Dialogical self; Plural; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.012971374005007946,"score_gpt":0.2919879738528455,"score_spread":0.27901659984783755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153447884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5040532,0.021130743,0.000971891,0.026072852,0.0014079548,0.0003029884,6.331067e-7,0.00002653545,0.4460332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958208,0.0010381415,0.000218179,0.0021843605,0.00037534177,0.0000010696165,4.2181904e-7,0.000004925129,0.00035676782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828607,0.0005859039,0.00040212736,0.00010020766,0.00034629396,0.00027940798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908805,0.00018624442,0.00033080662,0.00013779278,0.0001839888,0.00007312622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002169295,0.00009239351,0.00023302254,0.00005440673,0.00022151116,0.00004608004,0.0004816318,0.00015727952,0.000118340875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004405806,0.00006260376,0.00014007052,0.000078730634,0.0002688848,0.00026928115,0.000021897391,0.00025196816,0.0000056586623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013558066,0.00005356967,0.0007121293,0.0000016526913,0.0000225296,0.00009591857,0.09645661,0.00003980969,0.00034029712,0.88208014,0.008000135,0.012061641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008739065,0.00034897125,0.0036776613,0.00003216058,0.00003616148,0.00012089785,0.013937535,0.000035187077,0.00007840753,0.9769046,0.003838896,0.00011564639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015586958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06587258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49176762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028046526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001717955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99096835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182189785","doi":"10.82308/12036","title":"Civil marriage commissioners in the province of Saskatchewan: religious freedom and public service","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil service; Political science; Service (business); Public service; Public administration; Law; Business","score_opus":0.015546305248728718,"score_gpt":0.26059533468375645,"score_spread":0.24504902943502774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182189785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6010133,0.0011884645,1.486686e-7,0.0006585399,0.00060075236,0.0012313412,0.00017617331,0.00011994512,0.3950113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994337,0.0015158999,0.00018023417,0.000635814,0.00008033627,0.00007584314,0.00035488763,0.000064197586,0.0027557537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488956,0.0011486366,0.0009283344,0.00079151173,0.0014948942,0.0007470861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971971,0.0004466062,0.00078001025,0.00070007145,0.0005707082,0.00030552156],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026584442,0.00053414976,0.0006649419,0.00046893055,0.0013633103,0.00022754679,0.0013153682,0.0009187177,0.00004347838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012598331,0.0004634157,0.00019858847,0.0012212464,0.00023135314,0.00075081154,0.000083168765,0.001097054,0.00002647083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063259096,0.0015922865,0.0005943028,0.0017211357,0.00020234732,0.00030056003,0.009792025,0.000054301967,0.007673821,0.6037551,0.0013516387,0.3723299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046853097,0.000692394,0.01118599,0.0022180637,0.0006252868,0.00003549464,0.24124075,0.000056665114,0.003241848,0.5357093,0.19691688,0.0033920077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054813858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64089215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5860783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041288917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044712104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214884191","doi":"","title":"Religious Freedoms Under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Do Religious Freedoms Permit Religious Autonomy?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Autonomy; Multiculturalism; Law; Charter; Cultural rights; Religious freedom; Linguistic rights; Religious discrimination; Minority rights; Religious pluralism; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.006703056904974582,"score_gpt":0.24127526434986135,"score_spread":0.23457220744488677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214884191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65019864,0.054964345,0.008003536,0.03682505,0.004196812,0.0024647955,0.000053384847,0.00042269754,0.24287073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832875,0.013169466,0.00010007182,0.0005717627,0.0013989933,0.000024914558,0.0000096043495,0.00005911555,0.0013785815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933322,0.00064242445,0.0008730132,0.0005979372,0.0011160569,0.0034383808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722624,0.00034115813,0.0005950653,0.00067276065,0.00050969404,0.00065506],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049451706,0.00046283903,0.0005755982,0.0004860899,0.0023414143,0.00048321686,0.0011652078,0.0004818887,0.000034790257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028983824,0.0003465057,0.00032718616,0.00054162485,0.0018111422,0.0003749066,0.00008183786,0.0019252179,0.00006766838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056761754,0.000070247974,0.0012088879,0.000011920264,0.00020929343,0.000010648147,0.0176875,0.00011336541,0.0000726187,0.95520747,0.019521773,0.0058295433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013938274,0.00047207705,0.00057636533,0.00006821198,0.00018055651,0.00028934277,0.008894255,0.00018700799,0.000031226373,0.9527755,0.034618534,0.00051311636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69686425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9212709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33308885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024837523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007030235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249906295","doi":"10.82308/20400","title":"La compénétration des ordres normatifs : étude des rapports entre les ordres normatifs religieux et étatiques en France et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.019444399241169977,"score_gpt":0.28702267994616537,"score_spread":0.2675782807049954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249906295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7102634,0.0030184828,0.000026633681,0.00022609164,0.0007294523,0.0010130304,0.00046826477,0.00045671017,0.28379798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756423,0.012800169,0.004543105,0.0006072905,0.00021632374,0.00030987096,0.0015170717,0.00022532664,0.0041384916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869719,0.0059519703,0.002228971,0.0013720788,0.0020052155,0.0014698757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930381,0.0023510316,0.0017877507,0.0007387218,0.0013878378,0.00069652236],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005432975,0.0014902876,0.0012782353,0.0006578733,0.005504317,0.00069305307,0.0013420825,0.0017748567,0.0004018467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029324484,0.0015800678,0.0006900412,0.0012464517,0.0014733246,0.0052145114,0.00019433496,0.0020486175,0.00043659058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021820882,0.0009435075,0.007919273,0.0016270685,0.00035308368,0.00007697147,0.033305984,0.0013669296,0.0043858825,0.60101086,0.00012874763,0.34866348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004987551,0.0012588254,0.30371317,0.008963893,0.0019747224,0.00020958328,0.17457092,0.00077426963,0.04515576,0.20975876,0.24016483,0.00846773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42759448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88692147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45932695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029400988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013772547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257067675","doi":"","title":"Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: Re-imagining Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Multiculturalism; Islam; Political science; Sociology; Arbitration; Tribunal; Gender studies; Law; State (computer science); Politics","score_opus":0.01026718193761669,"score_gpt":0.2479797459274932,"score_spread":0.2377125639898765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257067675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6452032,0.038139474,0.00066916127,0.008565047,0.00009173243,0.00037404412,0.0000042313836,0.00002163591,0.3069315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519124,0.04661448,0.00008196188,0.000051952116,0.000074699994,0.000002517825,4.2304325e-7,0.000004916857,0.0012566287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858993,0.0001685695,0.0002096011,0.000102536054,0.00027100078,0.00065838883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957126,0.00010249027,0.00018798037,0.00004359351,0.000070278504,0.000024420115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024865344,0.00006816331,0.000118923424,0.000032381406,0.00032661608,0.00006607713,0.00010766175,0.00003857254,0.0000033302658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005062896,0.00005006016,0.000035069526,0.00012737929,0.00051340985,0.00012984873,0.00002444155,0.0004159311,5.0784473e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049665334,0.000008987294,0.010398367,0.000008142906,0.000012450554,0.0000010214947,0.0114564095,0.000022195354,0.000021193115,0.9733185,0.0017996159,0.0029034626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010277027,0.000029101102,0.0035062183,0.000018073337,0.0000131195275,0.000012964166,0.025373545,0.000020855901,0.000010115724,0.9697403,0.00018659959,0.0000614326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010712939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024621293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30670923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022079468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005411532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265962699","doi":"","title":"Separation of Sharia from the State as Accommodation - Effects and Limits","year":2013,"lang":"hr","type":"article","venue":"Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Sharia; Accommodation; State (computer science); Law; Political science; Diversity (politics); Space (punctuation); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Islam; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019188735749484216,"score_gpt":0.2722483576757625,"score_spread":0.2530596219262783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265962699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924842,0.0006805904,0.0007307674,0.0010206453,0.0009457389,0.00047511733,0.00004832423,0.0000118185135,0.0036027834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852467,0.00024299436,0.0004024714,0.000015831765,0.0000643374,1.3503452e-8,0.00003787992,0.0000072926964,0.00070452667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974012,0.00041624674,0.00058429985,0.00034254085,0.00094778533,0.00030796096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604654,0.00063907134,0.0018550896,0.0002703304,0.0010179288,0.00017102246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014287859,0.00017264066,0.00039716222,0.00025521318,0.0007933612,0.00028032038,0.000569579,0.00012026303,0.00029950135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026534777,0.00015922118,0.00017215432,0.00076418626,0.0011310951,0.0010745273,0.00017376766,0.00017282585,0.000022365208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002820927,0.001461779,0.11552275,0.00070565904,0.00096245605,0.000038719514,0.5540712,0.0031315754,0.14300895,0.03915809,0.041072134,0.1005846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023373796,0.00021821179,0.8345018,0.0016441651,0.0006473227,0.0000060863667,0.095045224,0.025662612,0.01243826,0.026734663,0.00023547531,0.0005287923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022758858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017175159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71897906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004634885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027418247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9837487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269194084","doi":"","title":"The land of Unlikeness: A post-colonial review of the Anglican covenant","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"St. Mark's Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Ordination; History; Colonialism; Identity (music); Religious studies; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03773791178091053,"score_gpt":0.3646085498903017,"score_spread":0.3268706381093912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269194084","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.1911579e-7,0.9639634,8.9984366e-7,0.0020877407,0.00071751355,0.0034907782,0.0001627601,0.000014027052,0.0295627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000007696583,0.99812967,0.000010345934,0.0005943891,0.00029302354,0.0002536312,0.000053128257,0.000028767996,0.00062933355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450487,0.0025123733,0.0013697513,0.00028250355,0.00089906325,0.0004314486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574184,0.0007195291,0.0020089184,0.0009327102,0.0004825708,0.000114431765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005412906,0.00034575598,0.0021952502,0.000043794105,0.00037861546,0.00002949005,0.0014191002,0.0001982764,0.00019654859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021314411,0.00015718475,0.0013308427,0.00096842536,0.00067239057,0.000085494554,0.00021140346,0.00027669477,0.000033801316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014056817,0.000028069726,0.000007995892,0.27949896,0.000049776318,5.85505e-7,0.000069294205,2.2621587e-9,1.8787434e-8,0.0051718,0.014598884,0.7005732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036478807,0.000018537632,0.00001027251,0.28421056,0.0017611709,0.000005762365,0.000010370417,1.4590071e-8,5.6149474e-8,0.00019959804,0.71361345,0.00013372453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020840995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015938284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70043945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013347797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013898391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6409808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270080128","doi":"","title":"\"Obligations Concerning the Return of Nationals to a State Party to an Internationally Recognized Armed Conflict\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Armed conflict; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08451678797065643,"score_gpt":0.265028703960899,"score_spread":0.18051191599024258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270080128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02848891,0.00005586619,0.0006698118,0.0014086663,0.00057082105,0.0012065329,0.002459861,0.00027208464,0.9648675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5756697,0.00067729194,0.00078180543,0.00034549378,0.0003308669,0.0000018251677,0.0017703464,0.000056585937,0.4203661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971914,0.00031569728,0.00034645756,0.0005986705,0.0011475667,0.00040020677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972632,0.00040375013,0.0005836761,0.00040453198,0.0008165887,0.0005282514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033062717,0.00030475637,0.00042539093,0.0011210159,0.0007655094,0.00035107924,0.001695499,0.00028826387,0.0004080128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037370203,0.0003251428,0.00027849624,0.0019226852,0.00051161536,0.0024017189,0.00047077792,0.00031312153,0.00009350479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016761143,0.0007082932,0.0190068,0.00013462058,0.0010296981,0.0002878484,0.07013857,0.0003357901,0.000049002487,0.3105042,0.57746,0.018669099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045283555,0.00013811221,0.0014634624,0.00019867466,0.00010663994,0.0000023485115,0.017456124,0.000007078418,0.000046027897,0.0020193274,0.977686,0.0004233537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040991753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002730075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5471808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050305005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033326396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279996450","doi":"","title":"The Identity of Anglicanism: Essentials of Anglican Ecclesiology by Paul Avis (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecclesiology; Identity (music); Philosophy; Theology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.01058580801410783,"score_gpt":0.311292601806551,"score_spread":0.30070679379244314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279996450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52300555,0.3076411,0.0018839464,0.016731557,0.00218874,0.0009832564,0.000024200832,0.00002281148,0.14751883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417614,0.057382483,0.00010591286,0.00022572793,0.00013314858,0.000004159488,0.000001002522,0.0000048081647,0.0003813769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810725,0.00072520034,0.00061565207,0.00007860863,0.00026998372,0.0002032828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977714,0.00038310536,0.0010193721,0.00016554387,0.0005805738,0.00008003336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017232816,0.00007499081,0.00038037662,0.000023021925,0.00012932224,0.0000097452175,0.00059578335,0.00009283731,0.001048671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006971338,0.00004826152,0.00016011811,0.00006126963,0.0008379124,0.00031351374,0.000051512478,0.00007312247,0.000006360147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078206074,0.00024036736,0.0023827292,0.00011725625,0.00020782546,0.0000046023833,0.004807693,0.0000024546264,0.022022182,0.5033551,0.43741882,0.029362792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020767038,0.0023022462,0.03872221,0.0004694849,0.00070004934,0.000092164984,0.02039593,0.00001574522,0.009163575,0.88118947,0.044354983,0.00051742524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026988788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013719707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064769374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115301795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297473546","doi":"","title":"Arbitration, Religion and Family Law: Private Justice on the Backs of Women","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Private law; Family law; Business; Public law","score_opus":0.018318610557761635,"score_gpt":0.280770204734995,"score_spread":0.26245159417723335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297473546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40038443,0.000050705534,0.00012951244,0.0030439044,0.00004159315,0.00009595633,3.71756e-7,0.00001816866,0.5962354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949453,0.0004895987,0.00029165848,0.0034094492,0.00012458443,0.000008282722,6.918645e-7,0.000002919331,0.000727538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993758,0.00006727591,0.000116414194,0.0000896021,0.0002105339,0.00014033556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963063,0.00013710065,0.000048422986,0.000091916925,0.000043866512,0.0000480796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004785033,0.000044446133,0.00005731816,0.00002036005,0.0002500078,0.000039142575,0.000086821754,0.00004201,0.000025421656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121557125,0.000028938375,0.000014948538,0.00008591398,0.0001844631,0.000107909385,0.00001081298,0.0000398681,0.000019810632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007941545,0.000018516424,0.000044818218,0.0000038473936,0.0000022367972,7.3578356e-8,0.007217149,0.0000074912027,0.00085866614,0.98645395,0.0046987534,0.00068653026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009875508,0.00038438672,0.0069573848,0.000060358438,0.000084049454,9.0594057e-7,0.038393635,0.00046789774,0.008409714,0.7326826,0.2111527,0.00041881885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035381787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016811523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59550786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043838325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032522097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53486913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312699049","doi":"10.7202/1035335ar","title":"Equality, Responsibility, and Culture: A Comment on Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1057056092805917,"score_gpt":0.3572065522453373,"score_spread":0.2515009429647456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312699049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36177614,0.0004452724,0.0041559306,0.048394836,0.00050435466,0.00090206164,0.000046418194,0.00030308057,0.5834719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99096847,0.00024953147,0.0005951684,0.0074332366,0.00017542038,0.000028157097,0.000035523353,0.000010086663,0.0005044203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979287,0.0009909513,0.00019141615,0.00024351677,0.00036429818,0.0002811155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991703,0.0001657126,0.00008020363,0.0001474974,0.00017196072,0.0002643353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025919154,0.000113672955,0.00013096296,0.00006219441,0.00028705582,0.00012135789,0.00012851777,0.00026165228,0.00001861804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008959382,0.000103470426,0.000043764983,0.00011263453,0.00024264137,0.00012137734,0.00004864841,0.00022111261,0.00004081219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062509935,0.00034127032,0.010152581,0.00006425728,0.00003876558,0.000031935582,0.1874124,0.000026299878,0.00043189558,0.6709669,0.08723816,0.042670384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009985139,0.000458819,0.001274739,0.00007415422,0.000025388166,0.0000060164384,0.026131999,0.00009028386,0.000901103,0.920629,0.049079485,0.00033047565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018833185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011285913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62919235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036240963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016250875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98770046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320468231","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006554","title":"Emerging Legal Issues Involving Islam in Europe","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Conversation; Political science; Subject (documents); Soviet union; Classics; Law; Theology; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.01271117894001443,"score_gpt":0.29936639385805275,"score_spread":0.2866552149180383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320468231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073727235,0.0013222671,0.002046493,0.0059576673,0.000747895,0.000100986166,0.0000013815559,0.00007222682,0.91602385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633986,0.00023916698,0.00089891243,0.00016413057,0.0016447635,0.0000012514382,0.0000015459246,0.0000124100325,0.0006979526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835134,0.00024661352,0.0003380358,0.0001446503,0.0004969038,0.00042246943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994837,0.00011335423,0.0000733458,0.000067312525,0.00015975523,0.00010251504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008628907,0.00009615658,0.0001403461,0.000095009826,0.0007529251,0.00037940723,0.0002045781,0.00007258928,0.00020031742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044814477,0.00008938676,0.000052083753,0.0003429136,0.00026535807,0.0004497872,0.00003002308,0.00030091943,0.00006053815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075099997,0.00006165917,0.0009464671,0.000002765386,0.0000021037326,0.00012927833,0.0011310079,0.00015962392,0.00016384243,0.9919119,0.0044004675,0.0010833652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013208635,0.0001327304,0.023845568,0.0002291296,0.0000458169,0.000118885706,0.007895471,0.0015454768,0.00036007358,0.7977048,0.16615888,0.00064227555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029779129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052336786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094554794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094392926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97668165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322037171","doi":"10.1177/0014524612454398c","title":"25 <sup>th</sup> November: Reign of Christ the King","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Expository Times","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reign; Theology; Philosophy; Ancient history; History; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019862611719826312,"score_gpt":0.27652807808754676,"score_spread":0.2566654663677205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322037171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10884877,0.004230908,0.00012061361,0.0014490971,0.0005887975,0.00027558123,0.000002198551,0.00006603709,0.884418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915497,0.00009460938,0.00007002319,0.00016705427,0.0014066778,0.000013524311,0.0000012073909,0.000009606288,0.0066876095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987942,0.00028801407,0.00016822225,0.00009128008,0.00038399684,0.00027430247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992028,0.00028769532,0.00011354159,0.00027520378,0.000062428495,0.000058341233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009930201,0.00008670861,0.00010602709,0.00002773346,0.0007506645,0.000051358467,0.00044096788,0.00006537943,0.00015710284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009936732,0.00004958331,0.00008304324,0.00014700911,0.00047823132,0.00020914956,0.000054300817,0.00009672245,0.00010792622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030918767,0.00015419038,0.0069319755,0.000019427314,0.00005080399,8.1951384e-7,0.1696244,0.00015793326,0.003972596,0.67037016,0.14149214,0.007194634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020178894,0.00039184702,0.058669377,0.0003628617,0.00073600136,0.000023121833,0.2486973,0.0015172074,0.04983283,0.118422486,0.5177551,0.0015740198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00375436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000087672495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004105633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005752634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.577358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327991827","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914000961","title":"Freedom from Past Injustices Nahshon Perez Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; History; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01796452192475687,"score_gpt":0.2612541575890478,"score_spread":0.24328963566429093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327991827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37246174,0.00032435148,0.0030320734,0.013011833,0.0050725555,0.0001837886,0.000071356204,0.00003068946,0.60581166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545944,0.000020600954,0.00053864496,0.00025162706,0.002218657,1.7403845e-7,7.921717e-7,0.0000041433887,0.0015059081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975933,0.000120878685,0.00026360402,0.00021533818,0.0007686498,0.0010382567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563384,0.00033455138,0.00016533252,0.00015996769,0.000606914,0.0030993866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017864645,0.00010770535,0.00018275075,0.00027214477,0.0010388022,0.00030126597,0.0010441312,0.00010650562,0.0005120543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027963633,0.00009943041,0.00008383953,0.00042936509,0.0030574433,0.0010891845,0.00003482133,0.0002218451,0.000008147501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006737912,0.000014765712,0.00549177,0.0000017595441,0.000005145802,0.000027090337,0.0018705764,0.000025523343,0.00012525622,0.9336949,0.057614185,0.0011222633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012821185,0.00046273245,0.16136254,0.000231195,0.0002591874,0.000030045236,0.029892767,0.00143392,0.00034859203,0.14481135,0.65902674,0.0008587872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54877484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24294077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78888357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007272319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003193562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336079757","doi":"10.7202/1035668ar","title":"The Protection of Religious Freedom under the European Convention on Human Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Toleration; Freedom of thought; Convention; Political science; International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; Conscience; International law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02673923157394651,"score_gpt":0.2759606894391198,"score_spread":0.24922145786517327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336079757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3007313,0.000103626415,0.0025425358,0.006444774,0.00048505666,0.0006793957,0.0000039422575,0.00009831592,0.688911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352866,0.00013881041,0.0000106979505,0.000029473364,0.00049415266,0.000023383851,0.0000015380944,0.000010984717,0.0057622674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864835,0.00051932095,0.00021417247,0.00015459883,0.00024660164,0.00021695471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992374,0.00014672492,0.00018711669,0.00028421602,0.00009748041,0.000047044457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001374271,0.00006195733,0.00008268595,0.0000400862,0.0010439571,0.000057164925,0.00029958898,0.000058609254,0.000013377526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000922348,0.00003991005,0.0001014251,0.00013680308,0.00040506702,0.0000780325,0.000020729698,0.00008082387,0.000098879995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018023511,0.00003919576,0.00011366842,0.000008922195,0.000013632745,0.0000022184265,0.0015319667,0.000019566723,0.0033462467,0.98432827,0.003943117,0.006635198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048306337,0.00014775874,0.00619214,0.0001586431,0.00003157907,0.000004353499,0.00074406265,0.00002083293,0.0015959524,0.9711698,0.01932109,0.00013067697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041732085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062986207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69279736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015900987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002556268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8029379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338100904","doi":"10.17645/si.v4i2.504","title":"Living Together v. Living Well Together: A Normative Examination of the SAS Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Inclusion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Normative; Sociology; Oppression; Law; Mantra; Sincerity; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01970681895293581,"score_gpt":0.29338187803385096,"score_spread":0.27367505908091516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338100904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80561006,0.00007947391,0.0005911266,0.0016875337,0.0004169085,0.00028927712,0.0000057018106,0.00004944588,0.19127044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669915,0.000059479684,0.000047801575,0.00012320236,0.00037472392,0.000010096962,3.421576e-7,0.000011932762,0.0026732571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795634,0.0009150022,0.00022888675,0.00015025865,0.000531849,0.00021768452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987174,0.0006529915,0.00024744257,0.00012269453,0.00021614229,0.000043282063],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018568854,0.000097005504,0.00012469589,0.000060849183,0.0025346708,0.00002802513,0.00024962414,0.00016082254,0.0002772359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079723273,0.000060160495,0.00011333152,0.00028538174,0.0003731976,0.00030075572,0.0006475947,0.000075651245,0.000025863126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007784108,0.00012876431,0.0038039614,0.000022480415,0.000015285372,0.000007350945,0.8016039,0.0000013633341,0.008036967,0.0471277,0.0013017025,0.13794275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021870267,0.0004349846,0.1980641,0.0031112793,0.0003746914,0.000059829632,0.573943,0.0003526328,0.011307955,0.17989305,0.028184325,0.0020871388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011939927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019613804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22766091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026912396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010579244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345542358","doi":"10.1515/wps-2016-0001","title":"The Controversy over Religious Arbitration Tribunals in Ontario: Unspoken Identity-Based Justifications?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Opposition (politics); Islam; Faith; Sociology; Identity (music); Law; Political science; Religious identity; Compulsory arbitration; Epistemology; Negotiation; Politics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.024485303344638817,"score_gpt":0.3369978418985137,"score_spread":0.31251253855387484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345542358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25307813,0.00011244805,0.005288069,0.07737661,0.0014352674,0.0009198953,0.000013165646,0.00014487393,0.6616315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950786,0.00001603153,0.00010290425,0.0011284625,0.00009249006,0.000031413674,0.0000011755957,0.0000038641506,0.0035450268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741995,0.00014733632,0.00029530647,0.00030708188,0.0009303696,0.0008999315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818134,0.0009542311,0.00007751307,0.0002704892,0.00019137628,0.0003250759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260337,0.00008947517,0.00010353126,0.00019166808,0.0010159203,0.00036727826,0.0005836756,0.00004567616,0.00010129707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020578532,0.000055052624,0.00005604566,0.0009899035,0.0023283844,0.0007183669,0.000031570875,0.0001120944,0.00010088506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231587,0.000030660853,0.0136991525,8.0157196e-7,7.888794e-7,0.0000011714957,0.00034554585,0.0000025033498,0.0007531932,0.9834525,0.001348862,0.00035252023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083108153,0.00003336099,0.27535325,0.000053591517,0.000016615004,4.095253e-7,0.00054587825,0.000090607115,0.0009776673,0.6706144,0.05125609,0.00022700187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3794555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90759444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74200046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016171171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018788262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85790294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466124574","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511801594.007","title":"Patterns of engagement – political","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03849279922989903,"score_gpt":0.2550254394813766,"score_spread":0.2165326402514776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466124574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014800207,0.00005222701,0.00027758683,0.00006777382,0.00017661233,0.0002788108,0.00015278775,0.000060419396,0.9987858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102981135,0.00017064114,0.000036219662,0.000048581853,0.00027520335,2.8929773e-7,0.000022188398,0.00001490022,0.8964508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882865,0.000078025645,0.00015482849,0.00024350753,0.0004119697,0.0002830133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918187,0.000073589974,0.00015041386,0.00024209364,0.00016589896,0.0001861226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018624666,0.00016193239,0.00023228352,0.00013288659,0.00022148754,0.000022100427,0.00036021596,0.00027532002,0.000024254607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018822222,0.00019731265,0.00017214064,0.0000041184844,0.00027433925,0.00005784614,0.000144014,0.00021312678,0.00001092445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001984479,0.000011014509,0.000011086907,0.000036849666,0.0000367162,0.000027511436,0.00038392874,3.846031e-7,0.0000043070613,0.9851902,0.012962823,0.0013153485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002674442,0.000027255608,0.000038774204,0.000090692505,0.00014658917,5.70933e-7,0.00062044937,0.000002701468,0.00008902287,0.00017282789,0.9983351,0.00020854345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005298942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012751704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029032008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016288416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80461764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484722975","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0008","title":"Citizenship and the Challenge of Aboriginal Self‐Government: Is Deep Diversity Desirable?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Government (linguistics); Politics; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Cultural assimilation; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.021604004611305464,"score_gpt":0.25216231471361306,"score_spread":0.2305583101023076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484722975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013369085,0.0014002268,0.00003686323,0.001270874,0.000087142806,0.00028799576,0.000019470794,0.000036609097,0.9967271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47485474,0.044960957,0.0001052751,0.0003227286,0.00023201542,0.0000023019911,0.0000031582358,0.00001547874,0.47950336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984742,0.000054203,0.00017727923,0.00023001939,0.00087360176,0.00019072978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993528,0.0001672174,0.00015686717,0.0001769864,0.000068976005,0.000077136494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000556054,0.00015859418,0.00025374282,0.000030684638,0.00068954483,0.000040691015,0.00026859238,0.00024066988,0.001903714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012503207,0.00011382189,0.000116679614,0.000022075037,0.0007182221,0.00005767596,0.00008144332,0.0001396353,0.000031514606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051560277,0.000008445568,0.000056960722,0.000019153851,0.000052510055,0.000002332466,0.013062626,1.5181307e-7,6.4960794e-8,0.979201,0.00442123,0.0031239707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006937638,0.000036669535,0.000067425426,0.000033265664,0.00019198115,5.6676566e-7,0.00075662194,0.0000107165015,0.0000038849007,0.9557738,0.042258017,0.00017330592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024051114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014915582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5172238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009907728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006702484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517982792","doi":"10.1086/343021","title":"Book ReviewsMargaret Moore, . <i>The Ethics of Nationalism</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. 260. $45.00 (cloth).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Nationalism; Download; Media studies; Section (typography); Sociology; History; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06908773803624252,"score_gpt":0.33420642310245724,"score_spread":0.2651186850662147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517982792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003177203,0.026744314,0.0017790925,0.035365704,0.000853861,0.0007179761,0.000064263666,0.00009363909,0.93406343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12192102,0.7400664,0.0027313344,0.026176514,0.0007348532,0.000024446103,0.00013536312,0.00007481738,0.108135246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960509,0.0018825529,0.0003154382,0.0002529948,0.001171146,0.00032697988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667126,0.0017501488,0.00028840726,0.00033113925,0.00083414506,0.00012490526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063699884,0.00014680676,0.0002150376,0.000043362365,0.0010976923,0.000053600128,0.00053077796,0.0006290292,0.0002801255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006265516,0.00012767798,0.00014300851,0.0003833359,0.0009503782,0.0002978271,0.000054603974,0.0012502744,0.000008661908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072518856,0.00003363719,0.00021017074,0.00006530063,0.000012107373,0.0000015676827,0.008899613,0.000031844982,0.0000061614146,0.72492754,0.26570258,0.00010221319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022465935,0.000024103529,0.00012926715,0.00006539741,0.00004472632,9.1147206e-7,0.0028217232,0.000025435253,0.00010981715,0.026901122,0.9695023,0.00015055337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057139057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027871274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017572583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013288175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86377543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521091882","doi":"","title":"On Collective Constitutional Rights: Lessons for Religious Rights from Language Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Individualism; Law; Autonomy; Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Rights of Nature; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Right to property; Human rights","score_opus":0.011442832389271783,"score_gpt":0.2960408376415442,"score_spread":0.2845980052522724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521091882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29742867,0.0052113794,0.15570877,0.021599906,0.0037959043,0.0020126307,0.00048752135,0.00039006697,0.51336515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899073,0.00056433503,0.00013374805,0.00009022977,0.001068641,0.00003053998,0.000014625075,0.000009071942,0.008181459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970637,0.0002058674,0.00027857008,0.0003176347,0.0005443766,0.0015898623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855596,0.0006753639,0.00020575819,0.00014910381,0.00024789487,0.00016590227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010238074,0.00018251868,0.00021491719,0.0001678072,0.0021082028,0.000101100195,0.00033779742,0.00017508319,0.0001000518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021856312,0.00011261569,0.00019139965,0.00017710036,0.000635088,0.0002611623,0.000013626019,0.00044425036,0.00009886663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001660481,0.00008215958,0.000019706536,6.107285e-7,0.00009906721,0.0000067538886,0.0022846332,0.0000026300315,0.00019474461,0.984713,0.011376629,0.0010539811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018009449,0.00026008944,0.00003152349,0.000053340435,0.00005495464,0.000020417841,0.00090884994,0.000004677276,0.00060498825,0.97750854,0.018542323,0.00020932456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012310258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10971657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69247866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002771204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003504896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2551934934","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000986","title":"Toleration or Latitude? Two Models for Liberal Politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Impartiality; Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0565158228639713,"score_gpt":0.35356846542373266,"score_spread":0.2970526425597614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2551934934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47188556,0.00015774467,0.19868936,0.09419525,0.0041344077,0.0008087134,0.000121766636,0.000041843283,0.22996536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994877,0.0000047597764,0.0022023653,0.0006664543,0.0007197223,0.000002095129,2.0799482e-7,0.000004504329,0.0015228981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982627,0.000044162152,0.0002522287,0.000114901464,0.00041273926,0.0009132615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701244,0.0002114493,0.00007870037,0.00008240208,0.00069150596,0.001923518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011222743,0.00006240838,0.00010724764,0.00021711137,0.00069415994,0.00019925427,0.00038914708,0.000045558834,0.00007893338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021171041,0.00003879102,0.00005850064,0.00024197839,0.001321694,0.00090351276,0.000007312988,0.000047929247,0.0000070269775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035789697,0.000005158724,0.0003691502,0.0000016147686,0.0000014463518,0.000005331836,0.0007901228,0.000020991938,0.000118782365,0.9958546,0.0014159067,0.001413311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006449961,0.00018271306,0.0043903682,0.00006476554,0.000018887162,0.000023199113,0.0009201168,0.0006281734,0.0005062449,0.9880311,0.0044321762,0.00015727626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06839556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22691894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5229914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000854233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008683782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556221961","doi":"10.1515/icl-2015-0104","title":"The Place of the Niqab in the Courtroom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Multiculturalism; Law; Witness; Accommodation; Charter; Citizenship; Political science; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Freedom of religion; Psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.04297987057629569,"score_gpt":0.332259574693555,"score_spread":0.2892797041172593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556221961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6163225,0.0014164969,0.000094306495,0.046537332,0.0013188059,0.0001903247,0.0000012687798,0.0000062686704,0.3341127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868095,0.00019139759,0.000010724545,0.00019490068,0.00027526362,0.0000013572325,4.9923063e-8,0.0000018281871,0.0006435008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876493,0.00042418274,0.0001271127,0.000032195225,0.00052306615,0.00012850363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947345,0.00018225814,0.00011138688,0.00009811401,0.0000985938,0.000036203084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028794624,0.000030517578,0.00004070561,0.000016311511,0.00047305855,0.00011983112,0.0004914027,0.000027393482,0.000006534421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046015292,0.000012029783,0.00004347625,0.00016266163,0.00020504474,0.000079615296,0.00001755837,0.00015768211,0.0000051126103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007403998,0.00010794575,0.046358116,0.0000025783759,0.000016892982,0.000011154523,0.21466702,0.00040536746,0.00008995769,0.21075292,0.51255345,0.014960527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014428808,0.000112116046,0.063223965,0.000059767153,0.000035851608,0.00008869737,0.3280555,0.00023773006,0.0001744332,0.3784802,0.22794388,0.00014499296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019556785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00752202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3823585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052752614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025565195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4197464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560223691","doi":"10.1400/238464","title":"Gli accomodamenti ragionevoli in materia di libertà religiosa tra giurisprudenza della Corte europea e della Corte canadese","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Duty; Jurisprudence; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Impartiality; Pluralism (philosophy); Supreme court; Public sphere; Relation (database); State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Sociology; Political science; Constitutional court; Identity (music); Human rights; Constitution; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02132801349354167,"score_gpt":0.2785450020323171,"score_spread":0.2572169885387754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560223691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72190636,0.00082479237,0.00023253233,0.0014890404,0.0017847416,0.0006573664,0.000086995955,0.00015075397,0.2728674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98516154,0.0032836252,0.0002413266,0.00044202217,0.0005694533,0.000013111646,0.000083666724,0.00010051353,0.010104736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941748,0.0016027122,0.0006762109,0.000963885,0.001178418,0.0014039993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702865,0.0003097205,0.0005138014,0.0006770833,0.00033863966,0.0011320943],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016579087,0.00061386934,0.00074262806,0.000673382,0.00055071176,0.0007145311,0.0012358623,0.00071711914,0.0002620312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024512538,0.00072428526,0.00027411804,0.0014874398,0.0009225079,0.0008332094,0.0003163077,0.00057734404,0.0004567205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001753821,0.0015616971,0.05671406,0.0002806596,0.0004646841,0.008406799,0.17354666,0.0024181171,0.00562707,0.24196696,0.49939728,0.007862202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023059536,0.0014840724,0.15743847,0.0010973513,0.0014791877,0.00029433356,0.086826645,0.010579357,0.001448677,0.07714806,0.6328516,0.00629271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1649201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035089444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26325518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014281152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015913751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581876056","doi":"","title":"Book Review: HASSAN MAHAMDALLIE (Ed.). Defending Multiculturalism: A Guide for the Movement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Multiculturalism; Sociology; Political science; History; Aesthetics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.22184270658559574,"score_gpt":0.4506123742871046,"score_spread":0.22876966770150886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581876056","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016147282,0.59171975,0.008944971,0.17155696,0.0231784,0.004869392,0.000102545986,0.00016268443,0.18331805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59717965,0.20951143,0.052798603,0.10858895,0.004789173,0.00059199886,0.000028234825,0.00006798287,0.026443973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756783,0.00037704167,0.0007261312,0.00019885835,0.00055041333,0.00057975017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711764,0.0006065366,0.0009132899,0.00020100763,0.000828381,0.0003331756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059508346,0.00016546395,0.00022276015,0.0001968055,0.0032937261,0.00013103886,0.0006997417,0.000082923194,0.00024318957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031530496,0.00012159318,0.00022717686,0.0005541747,0.00055532757,0.0013102724,0.00003041496,0.00014551927,0.000018259432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113013675,0.00034608258,0.0005537557,0.00019758834,0.00003280612,3.3840556e-7,0.012766658,0.00021261128,0.000488015,0.055607583,0.9156722,0.01411107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001656327,0.00008054292,0.0011736078,0.00053178956,0.0001557139,0.00007101807,0.015071899,0.00011535114,0.0004140712,0.0042590196,0.97777754,0.00018381774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093289686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035533815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5810324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019061385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006634838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587867489","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1271","title":"In the (Canadian) Shadow of Islamic Law: Translating Mahr as a Bargaining Endowment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Canadian Bar Association; McGill University","keywords":"Islam; Shadow (psychology); Multiculturalism; Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Ideology; Negotiation; Sharia; Law and economics; Plural; Pluralism (philosophy); Institution; Endowment; Narrative; Political science; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018030406697897006,"score_gpt":0.2828372173223689,"score_spread":0.26480681062447187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587867489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005618402,0.00030102968,0.00008011843,0.0026218754,0.00013295018,0.00013573426,0.0000033199285,0.000007182823,0.996156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983703,0.000042907577,0.0004081334,0.0006713916,0.0003140744,0.00000485902,0.0000025239274,0.000008013123,0.00017782835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841726,0.00027016015,0.0003243892,0.0001070314,0.0005172752,0.00036387457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995512,0.00008502454,0.00013716234,0.00008748024,0.00007141494,0.00006771231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014114053,0.00008766045,0.00012671866,0.0000808069,0.0009998454,0.0002027998,0.00030089126,0.00008500583,0.00013432973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034621855,0.00006912347,0.000090868656,0.00016027222,0.00020254872,0.0002845069,0.0000062166855,0.0002489977,0.000013142962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044792296,0.000029235327,0.00025130945,0.000002880103,0.000004540412,0.000037143363,0.0074901576,0.00013441923,0.0001561954,0.99088275,0.0003758782,0.0006310259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038781925,0.00003596412,0.00026124468,0.000041105835,0.000014158592,0.000038424747,0.003986953,0.000058883878,0.00011588813,0.99468046,0.00029767008,0.000081448765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99883354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99780846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016439379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023133143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76901037},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2605556373","doi":"10.1017/s1740355315000108","title":"The Ethics of the Empty Church: Anglicanism’s Need for a Theology of Architecture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Anglican Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Quarter (Canadian coin); Closing (real estate); Institution; Theology; Work (physics); Sociology; Religious studies; Political science; History; Law; Philosophy; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.13433034035157768,"score_gpt":0.4093706305743623,"score_spread":0.27504029022278464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605556373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7223393,0.018494891,0.0011136044,0.18633053,0.0027924625,0.00093659264,0.000029056124,0.000019174873,0.06794444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978952,0.00087104784,0.0002977213,0.00025784405,0.00032880504,0.000004648661,9.4186845e-8,0.000004825868,0.00033986088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857306,0.00038882307,0.00036229633,0.000057324196,0.00046276834,0.00015574499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962436,0.0014120154,0.0006857696,0.00013026751,0.0014758782,0.000052444473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030063405,0.00006882941,0.00026268692,0.000048609985,0.00036444346,0.00001120466,0.00039968872,0.00007665181,0.0000010469089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059412518,0.000032093172,0.00019207963,0.0002010388,0.0015470573,0.00003760041,0.0000651285,0.00021987126,1.08879426e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003750205,0.00010209465,0.0040597836,0.00005405601,0.00042666693,0.0000015940171,0.38965425,0.00010018283,0.0005979053,0.54305756,0.05487367,0.006697247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012372499,0.00094849087,0.005459807,0.00009896196,0.00022571885,0.000013174613,0.3376519,0.000006208888,0.001355722,0.6122707,0.040613193,0.000118861404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036565072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023103382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2755559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045703757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004369243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7112662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615927180","doi":"","title":"Tackling prejudice and engaging with religious minorities : how cities can make a difference with an intercultural cities approach.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Durham Research Online (Durham University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Islamophobia; Human rights; Political science; Context (archaeology); Convention; Population; Sociology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Politics; Law; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.05149511755780831,"score_gpt":0.29471803900082677,"score_spread":0.24322292144301846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615927180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96506906,0.00022019849,0.00059390534,0.005102747,0.000045711655,0.00047183104,0.000085932996,0.00018876101,0.02822185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96920633,0.0014091787,0.0013057791,0.0000402667,0.00022872614,0.0000067241185,0.000036145313,0.000023972081,0.02774288],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966743,0.00068051106,0.00013401898,0.00061261276,0.0010537055,0.0008448798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804676,0.00037788908,0.0000955337,0.0003107632,0.0007812568,0.0003878275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065104774,0.00025701482,0.0002863781,0.0006736157,0.0014964303,0.00040475262,0.00057346193,0.00013966105,0.0000078279545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002390185,0.00017483394,0.00004506886,0.0007541017,0.0027366213,0.000609165,0.00020607501,0.00041739244,9.880232e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036353436,0.0011127181,0.10550392,0.00081008027,0.0005069135,0.0012066363,0.5407433,0.000043693148,0.0037556575,0.25499955,0.0021245002,0.08555766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035101601,0.0018375175,0.01001139,0.00090354326,0.000105562875,0.00006790133,0.9626018,0.00030492188,0.00033965404,0.0039048253,0.015332519,0.0010802383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0198789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092248335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42185846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048644678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007594296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W262563095","doi":"","title":"Anglican and Episcopal Readings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Convention; Protestantism; Law; Synod; Church history; Theology; History; Sociology; Classics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01451824280908277,"score_gpt":0.3275030756231495,"score_spread":0.31298483281406675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W262563095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036441993,0.055558804,0.000016465894,0.00971205,0.000036953643,0.00041314895,0.0000029378568,0.00012902178,0.8976886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69770324,0.29002756,0.00013218325,0.006332279,0.00014198301,0.00003350832,0.0000049731148,0.0000059090244,0.0056183813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987597,0.00028604717,0.00019938948,0.00025263886,0.00021527318,0.0002869615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993961,0.00016242308,0.000055901422,0.00015091413,0.000043217224,0.0001914573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008132342,0.000106493346,0.000260253,0.000020250003,0.00026085935,0.0000369494,0.00020830912,0.00007829771,0.0049453815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005407559,0.000075612035,0.00007910163,0.00025097822,0.00068452954,0.00009576252,0.00002568373,0.00009425853,0.00020053542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006044216,0.000025866519,0.00067636755,0.000057442554,0.000004136899,0.000008510102,0.000527361,3.4832155e-8,0.000006598397,0.6741452,0.015605066,0.30893734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017431172,0.00014651255,0.0044767996,0.0005105518,0.00006439868,0.000012082138,0.00027324955,0.0000034414902,0.0000104220135,0.13022508,0.8638496,0.00025357847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011983588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032149517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89207023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024654655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032942506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W269282748","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0020","title":"Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial, and Religious Expression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Denial; Sexual orientation; Freedom of expression; Punishment (psychology); Immigration; Political science; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02924679277733437,"score_gpt":0.3004910290392545,"score_spread":0.2712442362619201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W269282748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025284107,0.0024876301,0.00007912036,0.0006044876,0.00030295955,0.0003495125,0.0000064877663,0.00018374878,0.9957332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05496987,0.015777437,0.0007889362,0.00043773276,0.0006926791,0.000004132609,0.000024936468,0.00002908496,0.9272752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828434,0.00005969624,0.0003170449,0.00043454737,0.0006300162,0.00027432587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910265,0.000091160226,0.00019059771,0.00028604042,0.00012902298,0.00020050626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047171162,0.00025183626,0.00031469323,0.00012788974,0.00040542273,0.0001593908,0.00022281715,0.00060302817,0.00036980223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000721128,0.000225381,0.00011990169,0.000030840696,0.00034165112,0.00012685284,0.00006372937,0.00021495474,0.0001752023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018410181,0.0000176784,0.000010793199,0.000020481964,0.000007770634,0.000024412051,0.002246281,1.8522518e-7,0.0001446209,0.8093249,0.13176812,0.05641634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019121674,0.00005326971,0.00001663816,0.00010333754,0.000039029946,0.0000040494942,0.0002179901,9.792958e-7,0.00014749063,0.63416165,0.36473405,0.00033028043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005957656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053540575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23296595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011070376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015845615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91907704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730428860","doi":"","title":"A Destruction of Muslim Identity: Ontario's Decision to Stop Shari'a-based Arbitration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Identity (music); Islam; Law; Business; Political science; Theology; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.018163909956121736,"score_gpt":0.3205209524441682,"score_spread":0.30235704248804646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730428860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91241467,0.00003253164,0.055765007,0.0003826141,0.0017662966,0.00012552629,0.0000057108055,0.000008817579,0.029498845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927672,0.000021824235,0.0061843097,0.00039460912,0.00051293813,0.0000012353315,0.000011165744,0.000007076034,0.000099631055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771166,0.00004701458,0.00065189326,0.00012022323,0.0013072485,0.00016197978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975682,0.00014468424,0.00052433525,0.00009097598,0.0015147377,0.00015709558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014545352,0.00008961319,0.00016529071,0.0003645082,0.0001737367,0.000068217385,0.00036650413,0.000084253516,0.00015333267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003659622,0.00008698018,0.00016173212,0.0002484043,0.000107418586,0.0007251156,0.000021237134,0.00016381039,0.000011160369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012533172,0.0003745481,0.3025673,0.000016935574,0.00010435316,0.000079362224,0.018057367,0.005395117,0.0015008934,0.6555361,0.0008054924,0.014309154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003121179,0.00091422454,0.86315674,0.00035215548,0.00016448605,0.000082064966,0.0028805307,0.00023792067,0.0046038306,0.09482139,0.029217418,0.00044807384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0529172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68777114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6348539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005951684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041142444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9533895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751457090","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n4p60","title":"Human Rights and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Law; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Sociology; Liberalism; Political philosophy","score_opus":0.03672037188946901,"score_gpt":0.3512015154988274,"score_spread":0.31448114360935836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751457090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8717766,0.00007922017,0.0000017671415,0.001751675,0.00014650548,0.000039020702,0.0000013585002,0.0000010275293,0.12620287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970248,0.000037590653,0.000018885648,0.0001473462,0.00021278503,2.702191e-7,9.217747e-8,0.0000015147666,0.002556728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995112,0.00006399559,0.00014413746,0.000036673795,0.00012851202,0.000115486335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996323,0.00004437259,0.00015186434,0.00006475246,0.000040344865,0.00006639168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064825895,0.000035763307,0.00010430255,0.000028928815,0.00080176786,0.00024361777,0.00011957114,0.000037326336,0.00001104927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000494354,0.000021295193,0.000026379435,0.000010440667,0.000693447,0.00013450478,0.000017377704,0.00007765364,4.9712054e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003063173,0.0000074596464,0.0010720999,0.0000022977383,0.0000057057127,0.000010345715,0.0037934866,2.2440791e-7,0.000012299849,0.99442506,0.0006113864,0.000056587516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096224045,0.000029550452,0.02585564,0.000027216538,0.000031503754,0.000007068912,0.00068850606,0.000012751389,0.000030071371,0.9522839,0.02002459,0.000046915586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081899956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03871649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12524824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017227689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013810563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97882444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756108888","doi":"10.1177/0191453709358834","title":"Faith in law?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Separation of church and state; Citizenship; Obligation; Faith; Sociology; Realm; Politics; State (computer science); Secular state; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02785350278673347,"score_gpt":0.3378942874117365,"score_spread":0.310040784625003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756108888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07162689,0.0000446381,0.000026153923,0.024750184,0.0008668331,0.0001741235,0.000006775062,0.000097484466,0.90240693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551696,0.000012483874,0.00012979786,0.0015308395,0.0024613559,0.000026489906,0.000004559229,0.000013873284,0.00030366838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875885,0.00010503067,0.00018921112,0.0002007565,0.00039204548,0.00035410677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995678,0.00008725337,0.00003641822,0.00009966619,0.00010880495,0.00010003542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043512552,0.00009994024,0.00014815743,0.000075091055,0.00066387275,0.00009160096,0.00023612753,0.00018475718,0.0001590261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018963976,0.000110217916,0.00008707261,0.00022692415,0.0008982094,0.0002607089,0.000027400174,0.00029882687,0.00010911631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047976214,0.00007011473,0.00024542067,0.000007437819,0.0000020168472,0.000007888382,0.012302816,7.45899e-8,0.0004905825,0.98517895,0.00086909014,0.00082081376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028793485,0.000012679523,0.001331566,0.0000057967486,0.000008138875,4.0542423e-7,0.0013833067,0.000002757573,0.000092225455,0.9828141,0.013912035,0.00014906359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088666435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021436831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92389005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050805636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000852064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766467779","doi":"10.1163/15718115-02404005","title":"Legal Pluralism and Reasonable Accommodation of Religious Diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Accommodation; Normative; Reasonable accommodation; Diversity (politics); Political science; Arbitration; Sociology; Religious freedom; International law; Comparative law; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019799898089918482,"score_gpt":0.3042422611656729,"score_spread":0.2844423630757544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766467779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92268574,0.00013112975,0.00006416411,0.0033790406,0.00088680227,0.0000611604,0.000009082698,0.00000863272,0.07277425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975312,0.0010312186,0.00018990238,0.00008239167,0.00047375428,5.6848995e-7,0.0000041786084,0.0000017167818,0.00068509975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990768,0.00006191963,0.00014673921,0.000116769625,0.0004934195,0.000104395054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925184,0.000060469447,0.0002638436,0.00009015919,0.00023363158,0.00010004993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042577946,0.00006724492,0.00009975541,0.0000865662,0.0017279296,0.0003783371,0.00034664298,0.000073787014,0.000019601828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012472157,0.000056029217,0.000043639404,0.000015865278,0.00029696937,0.00076023396,0.00013271275,0.00012741031,0.000003063876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013068019,0.00008775682,0.028436411,0.000004017364,0.000043986554,0.000049957198,0.0033323935,0.0000014468914,0.00006848413,0.9558724,0.0029633606,0.009009065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021415353,0.00021499388,0.32780343,0.00012609843,0.00006381114,0.00009187908,0.0008771312,0.000089640496,0.00026152836,0.5986557,0.069397666,0.00027658578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031445097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006492396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35721675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057963363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024369263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769746738","doi":"10.2174/9781681085937117020005","title":"The Case-Law Concept of Reasonable Accommodation: The European Court of Human Rights Facing the Governance of Cultural and Religious Diversity in the Public Space","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Current and future developments in law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; Human rights; Religious diversity; Political science; Law; Public space; Space (punctuation); Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04968149226689107,"score_gpt":0.30342910722498645,"score_spread":0.2537476149580954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769746738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0126495715,0.012352052,0.0000031018803,0.002965985,0.000871076,0.0007294686,0.000044451368,0.0000071826453,0.9703771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936421,0.0046376335,0.00000906058,0.000026305865,0.0001732019,0.0000032479438,0.000016287937,0.0000050212593,0.0014871558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987911,0.00020735791,0.00028650113,0.00017114551,0.00039098976,0.00015289593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988267,0.00014779196,0.00056669826,0.000251149,0.00018296906,0.00002472422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121246,0.00014898491,0.00020150871,0.00001737958,0.0022089863,0.00012051146,0.0006296703,0.00008604159,0.000003244654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003133716,0.00006865326,0.000043566208,0.000038496248,0.002050606,0.00018013586,0.00028262017,0.00025391928,4.1614337e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005365031,0.000010672377,0.00032100905,0.00002267097,0.000015593614,0.000006824004,0.028447596,1.8698393e-7,5.00417e-7,0.9625183,0.0041140374,0.0045372657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062936015,0.000025193027,0.004805889,0.00041800633,0.000056018678,0.000016526696,0.009808221,0.0000018136824,0.000014088893,0.06777272,0.91621345,0.00023872392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004728787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043634962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044849698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045913752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780089108","doi":"10.13130/1971-8543/9161","title":"Challenges of Pluralistic Societies with Dissimilar Cultural Identities and Religious Legal Traditions: ADR and the Role of Religious Mediation and Arbitration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Riviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Religious law; Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Religious pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Islam; Mediation; Legal realism; Comparative law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.017833979175324317,"score_gpt":0.25555701256523145,"score_spread":0.23772303338990713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780089108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91642237,0.016883519,0.00003779759,0.0051108133,0.00008108357,0.0004184953,0.000030499405,0.000032214444,0.06098322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345231,0.065142214,0.000067884925,0.000029952713,0.000045707235,0.0000051170528,0.000009294897,0.0000067814262,0.00016991468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899536,0.00012788571,0.00016318611,0.00021058504,0.00034797305,0.00015501815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989731,0.00022745627,0.00033924982,0.00018466134,0.0002126135,0.00006295253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029137265,0.00013366465,0.00026238282,0.00007518678,0.0012121596,0.00013635923,0.0001805598,0.00007905915,0.0000010809927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014452466,0.000100172845,0.000047071102,0.000063645086,0.0025553356,0.00063017255,0.00005785221,0.000081633705,2.0289347e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002470324,0.000059574762,0.010467946,0.00017218731,0.0001922658,0.000009859408,0.20822097,0.000009466867,0.00017834731,0.7767637,0.0018549705,0.0018236727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054929894,0.0005288999,0.21540286,0.0003529805,0.00092219334,0.000028807479,0.6292501,0.00063385203,0.0002209962,0.14475809,0.0018430894,0.00056511856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036304246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071374057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63200563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036642236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005475686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788678691","doi":"","title":"The Religion Clauses of the New Zealand Bill of Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.01682139988986197,"score_gpt":0.2859575613368566,"score_spread":0.26913616144699465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788678691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528736,0.00056715944,0.0003699534,0.02129096,0.00017137938,0.0004212447,0.000008252164,0.000021795347,0.12427566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97912526,0.0013409093,0.00008446199,0.0000041150215,0.00003647736,2.8159377e-8,7.879784e-7,0.000002413905,0.019405572],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987424,0.00016241407,0.00009047058,0.0000961833,0.0006860038,0.00022250118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988542,0.00043170544,0.00015075378,0.00022674125,0.00024259962,0.000093951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012600999,0.000046117435,0.00010774581,0.00009757863,0.00055367645,0.000010338636,0.0005112572,0.00007605592,0.000021610911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020276927,0.000027227119,0.000094005154,0.0004671039,0.0009368524,0.00010081771,0.00009583192,0.000098409524,0.0000043190003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077286776,0.00014572327,0.054789014,0.000043243243,0.00008461436,0.000009032073,0.05903698,0.000027428414,0.0032864707,0.23808591,0.63828504,0.0054336656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025827354,0.00047159972,0.19123016,0.0002595671,0.00009529237,0.0000019704382,0.059914056,0.000070756985,0.007863746,0.25749335,0.4797375,0.00027929663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28205207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22879788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15854757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047497768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002495584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78527457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794379701","doi":"10.18543/aahdh-8-2011pp55-70","title":"Freedom of religion versus freedom of business management in Spain: Spanish Case-law analyzed in the light of “reasonable accommodation” figure according to Canadian Case-law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Law; Duty; Common law; Obligation; Judgement; Reasonable accommodation; Labour law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03418002145604547,"score_gpt":0.3125540892297254,"score_spread":0.2783740677736799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794379701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8761628,0.00015945068,0.000037433783,0.0014139215,0.00044941434,0.00046021826,0.00001629604,0.000004228405,0.121296234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927706,0.000030166817,0.00035349006,0.000035729558,0.0001966137,0.000005528723,0.0000051465177,0.00001132872,0.00008491386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763924,0.00027654768,0.000882148,0.00019385123,0.0006576891,0.00035051038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746966,0.0001426979,0.0010514313,0.00046050164,0.00070432026,0.00017140478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018981845,0.00017326191,0.00048588467,0.00061851804,0.0010061448,0.00015800376,0.00096585945,0.00014224392,0.000035813202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015149024,0.00013385176,0.00014191653,0.0004492509,0.00035389178,0.0006931597,0.00006656788,0.00020427722,0.000002030053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002345784,0.00023994307,0.002005274,0.00009487767,0.00010677331,0.00778872,0.0109398505,0.0015407683,0.00021490523,0.9721831,0.0043204674,0.00033074617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.056571737,0.0040250514,0.11395003,0.009498759,0.0038731487,0.0062463335,0.19974582,0.001341262,0.0064403675,0.49967465,0.093708865,0.0049239616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8506256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97214895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47250843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033332178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018543248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7738554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796386265","doi":"10.1017/lst.2017.11","title":"Autonomy and prenuptial agreements in Ireland: a relational analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Irish; Commission; Common law; Law; Equity (law); Injustice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04825470394405566,"score_gpt":0.3693254662490878,"score_spread":0.3210707623050321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796386265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7391748,0.0013712049,0.0002389683,0.002032795,0.0002485339,0.00015253449,0.0000028148943,0.000030937248,0.25674742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967987,0.00018018995,0.0002348205,0.00006138154,0.00021919444,0.000011788808,0.0000024805631,0.0000016112759,0.0024898124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993901,0.000054818764,0.00011600028,0.00013135847,0.00018171813,0.00012595803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999764,0.000054453252,0.000038737933,0.000042447253,0.000072949406,0.000027378608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002505533,0.000049098442,0.00011032775,0.00011107733,0.0003210814,0.000032128286,0.000043616787,0.00003260435,0.000030730782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013201639,0.00004303932,0.00002902536,0.00033625038,0.00033503002,0.00015534506,0.000035911802,0.000034645673,0.000015753549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000328874,0.0000590171,0.6075492,0.00000749732,0.0005242285,0.0000048299994,0.11232281,0.000025190413,0.000010950556,0.26879454,0.0038157331,0.0068531106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091382937,0.00012183311,0.888194,0.00002473741,0.00035879572,3.5960645e-7,0.014024725,0.00048587102,0.00001676333,0.03068774,0.06492013,0.00025116996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06958288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28064483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008628468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046454035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798079748","doi":"10.4337/9781784719692.00005","title":"International and comparative perspectives on diversity management: an overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.10825308030533445,"score_gpt":0.3245990219933776,"score_spread":0.21634594168804314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798079748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009661997,0.00047586169,0.00003784259,0.0010525051,0.00084349315,0.00032224972,0.000049737417,0.00013386938,0.9969878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12802863,0.002295077,0.00019878335,0.0003419747,0.0012897862,0.000009474021,0.000038713093,0.000025874222,0.8677717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981084,0.00008630229,0.00017852218,0.0005335783,0.00086150964,0.00023168766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990253,0.00009673611,0.0002089894,0.0002386898,0.00025493035,0.00017536929],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006193613,0.00023872165,0.00025134647,0.00027874694,0.00083684543,0.0011652781,0.0006524823,0.0002645523,0.00029677385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060360275,0.00021368357,0.00010261765,0.000015277168,0.0004345239,0.0010438769,0.00046433904,0.0002770319,0.00005756196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024806015,0.0000142352765,0.000018316607,0.000012726374,0.00009938586,0.000009934156,0.029137706,1.3241197e-7,3.8936847e-7,0.9321494,0.014908957,0.023623971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039375416,0.00005863485,0.00020504468,0.0002592588,0.00006143336,8.9740684e-7,0.007737379,0.0000020305322,0.0000013308206,0.2778035,0.7131388,0.00033790417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077657634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010024607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69822985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033537342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005763791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806703425","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.8292","title":"Multiculturalism in Canada: Individual vs. Collective Rights  ","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Pretext; Human rights; Immigration; Law; Minority rights; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.1052147601157256,"score_gpt":0.36807412524702193,"score_spread":0.2628593651312963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806703425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7609859,0.000062281935,0.00009495328,0.1142619,0.00051239645,0.0015079551,0.000024803705,0.000127562,0.12242223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941286,0.0005066242,0.00008930968,0.00008731959,0.0002493063,0.00016602772,0.0000043698788,0.000014719822,0.004753715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522334,0.00029447358,0.0003910213,0.00059693906,0.0022913127,0.001202921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966666,0.0005768601,0.00012136926,0.00012373256,0.0021131516,0.0003982872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020876585,0.00021217555,0.00028758342,0.00044198445,0.00088557566,0.00037140414,0.0007805769,0.00017012471,0.00006938048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015160157,0.0001465139,0.00004682661,0.0012341902,0.0012410166,0.0009128974,0.00017794411,0.00040244835,0.00005928368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001628074,0.00011006888,0.021114558,0.000038924074,0.000058700763,0.00004447363,0.0866966,6.2453466e-7,0.0010544917,0.78214246,0.10259555,0.005980733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027114847,0.00025203533,0.033155724,0.0006553075,0.000025457504,0.0000054952548,0.06502547,0.00007727444,0.0037161706,0.8699157,0.023593018,0.00086682953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9718792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2331427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004058942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007646042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809263102","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n10.5","title":"REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION BASED ON RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR PRACTICES. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN, CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN APPROACHES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14268369864834157,"score_gpt":0.3728837980788236,"score_spread":0.23020009943048203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809263102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5641972,0.000073104246,0.00009087911,0.009755055,0.00006639982,0.00032963257,0.0000071434806,0.000017155202,0.42546344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828094,0.000025227484,0.00013224361,0.00023202169,0.0008225642,0.000002560232,0.0000046264504,0.000007973179,0.00049186096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979731,0.0011300738,0.00019263042,0.00014445616,0.0003303168,0.00022945597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984074,0.00034671012,0.0006688369,0.00019551162,0.00025607194,0.00012547385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017656358,0.00010541654,0.00016913512,0.0001181085,0.003388935,0.00025467016,0.00042097602,0.00002411499,0.00003409666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015906518,0.00005019088,0.000045197532,0.00021677902,0.0016419668,0.00019440695,0.00002083083,0.00025526562,0.000013210569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052521005,0.0002700075,0.005493364,0.000011553244,0.00031091183,0.00012726299,0.5014435,0.00008692317,0.000116614625,0.39249143,0.09606603,0.003057173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024089192,0.0039542136,0.300721,0.00027080026,0.0006059154,0.000075661446,0.12943214,0.00056992384,0.00046831762,0.49210367,0.068549894,0.0008395451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36424348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58248854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43408373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017813375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021212376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904991890","doi":"10.4324/9781315270661-8","title":"The challenging parallelism of rights claims based on religious identity and on sexual identity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallelism (grammar); Identity (music); Religious identity; Sexual identity; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Computer science; Human sexuality; Philosophy; Parallel computing; Aesthetics; Religiosity","score_opus":0.04046017338645062,"score_gpt":0.3239360623274196,"score_spread":0.283475888940969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904991890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010136114,0.0008167012,0.00023813988,0.000892671,0.0007254078,0.000404705,0.000009961455,0.000060868417,0.9958379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.769329,0.0039664945,0.000026985019,0.00011081163,0.00043525413,0.00000855437,0.00000957184,0.000023171047,0.22609013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785787,0.00007127509,0.0003211722,0.00039559903,0.0010896258,0.00026448804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838305,0.00031781537,0.0004194618,0.0005964533,0.00016741935,0.00011579682],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010225262,0.00024782307,0.00030959235,0.00013403826,0.0018565764,0.00036023813,0.00060720736,0.00038916816,0.00005583875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010212745,0.0001734849,0.00012984448,0.000015348229,0.00074610126,0.0003099697,0.000072088355,0.00027825098,0.000070013564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028772492,0.000018409792,0.000010834391,0.00001941852,0.000021340877,0.0000080959,0.00093279156,0.000010565233,0.0000013294,0.9907288,0.006526398,0.0016932203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035119004,0.00015790483,0.00016864436,0.00015234406,0.000061157094,4.7225964e-7,0.00028571681,0.00011426711,0.000007916179,0.9596429,0.038781922,0.00027556473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015444472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07676267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7697478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009597171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010788482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945750318","doi":"10.1108/s1059-433720190000079006","title":"Religious Accommodation in the Secular State: The Sharia Debates in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in law, politics, and society","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secular state; Sharia; Neutrality; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Multiculturalism; Common law; Sociology; Islam; Geography; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.06463093567756763,"score_gpt":0.3369315178786218,"score_spread":0.2723005822010542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945750318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40126777,0.022452192,0.000013885018,0.034374397,0.002799904,0.005551857,0.0003429822,0.00006289266,0.5331341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681565,0.016393002,0.0000074529007,0.0026509808,0.00015725645,0.00002547295,0.00003152713,0.0000140388565,0.012563758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839324,0.00024464834,0.0003531472,0.00024697548,0.0003962297,0.00036574103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984191,0.0010609756,0.0001423146,0.00022887843,0.000117408075,0.00003133534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001566219,0.00021322095,0.00033834184,0.00003932386,0.00054569216,0.00011041962,0.0002973708,0.00018392772,0.000003264315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017573178,0.00011814497,0.00007686307,0.00007156366,0.003437294,0.00006323948,0.00012565564,0.0004165272,7.7124895e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004719397,0.0000049964965,0.0008863425,0.00004190722,0.000047462454,0.0000031638112,0.14515556,0.000019583373,4.6746102e-8,0.8428476,0.010968324,0.000020271855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011196943,0.000019334797,0.0022537254,0.00019084483,0.00008234412,0.0000019619313,0.09059724,0.00008721645,5.4452835e-7,0.83817583,0.067182995,0.00028828063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9559389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97293925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56688875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038567456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026872577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972761749","doi":"10.5040/9781509911400","title":"Religion, Equality and Employment in Europe","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing Ltd eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Political science; Labour economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05163308555306596,"score_gpt":0.3113290036416802,"score_spread":0.25969591808861425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972761749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016748367,0.00056305336,0.000020815361,0.0024318628,0.00078214804,0.00042331495,0.000018817249,0.00013389433,0.9954586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013789003,0.00044007984,0.000051736588,0.00066062313,0.00090693176,0.000029504929,0.00008593072,0.000044798813,0.9839914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974178,0.00029815166,0.00044739642,0.00056908303,0.0007978816,0.00046968603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982114,0.00014855117,0.00043016655,0.0005652377,0.0004125252,0.00023212326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030542398,0.00026172877,0.0003745589,0.00026038865,0.0007876583,0.0045090546,0.0007984812,0.0005467097,0.000024496496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020458563,0.00026871433,0.00007384831,0.00004465461,0.000534637,0.0010270833,0.0002808533,0.0005982678,0.000047504305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000638117,0.000009818243,0.0001777035,0.00003255908,0.000007657405,0.000016029693,0.0054623396,1.4175389e-7,0.000002836713,0.4635687,0.52311176,0.0076040947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002545776,0.000018757371,0.00037673354,0.00025112202,0.000020751097,0.0000012045773,0.00011442357,0.0000012580115,0.0000040267296,0.15512776,0.8435528,0.00027655804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02976073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04738284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32044107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003408911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013845102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974262435","doi":"10.7202/1064487ar","title":"Entre Luxembourg et Strasbourg : modalités juridiques et diffractions européennes dans la gouvernance du religieux","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013443781517067974,"score_gpt":0.29111037191699934,"score_spread":0.27766659039993136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974262435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43435407,0.0034710788,0.00017958008,0.032828487,0.004300856,0.00040215635,0.00011296245,0.00019021177,0.52416056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9123072,0.03061894,0.00012815962,0.0011043936,0.000567372,0.000020127043,0.000024153704,0.000062738014,0.05516689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961848,0.0013904514,0.0004636534,0.0006514346,0.0006781885,0.0006314596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980611,0.00070949504,0.00034948203,0.00043007315,0.00022053631,0.0002292907],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000981415,0.000378022,0.0003886059,0.00008768658,0.00046734017,0.00031397643,0.00044878616,0.0002337123,0.00028376497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005065629,0.00039302366,0.0002567126,0.0005391152,0.0005353651,0.0008841604,0.00017248829,0.00048813928,0.0012386069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027285188,0.00053984695,0.04160072,0.00007047404,0.00006244761,0.0000931018,0.031595726,0.00023148565,0.0008877811,0.784308,0.13877451,0.0018085776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008011936,0.00018504055,0.32649353,0.00022507014,0.00013456153,0.000029612704,0.008092649,0.000106387284,0.00013697523,0.018465871,0.6447096,0.0006195157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011521436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008526227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7658422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022945515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067553413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982294728","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.74","title":"A Tale of Two (Diverse) Countries: Religious Diversity in Canada and Singapore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Political science; Religious freedom; Religious diversity; Charter; Sociology; Liberalism; Ethnic group; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Human rights; Ethnology; Economic freedom; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012225705339405405,"score_gpt":0.26701008077356947,"score_spread":0.25478437543416405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982294728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94225407,0.00022289301,0.000004406865,0.00020030582,0.00027789403,0.000067260924,0.0000068108257,0.0000035567018,0.05696282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992155,0.00044036782,0.000021989317,0.0001622679,0.000056376317,1.5774702e-7,9.096228e-7,0.0000023211383,0.0001001223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920136,0.000059725517,0.00013713381,0.00007562746,0.00035850727,0.00016763828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996256,0.000041964853,0.00011334703,0.000054685694,0.00008505874,0.00007933692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000328664,0.000048582453,0.000110498986,0.00003922123,0.00037567236,0.00003397631,0.00012036552,0.000028029597,0.00006879613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014422023,0.000047136582,0.00002247809,0.00007395404,0.00013690234,0.00017454934,0.00006122067,0.000100367266,0.0000042409765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050884155,0.000029299094,0.77999747,0.000035477933,0.00002042431,0.00014661282,0.046318673,0.00006720913,0.00006463852,0.15870664,0.013160574,0.0014020914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014252811,0.00044540662,0.38107908,0.00069226295,0.00022425695,0.00035740584,0.17432489,0.00037209017,0.00057005085,0.340516,0.08554735,0.0016184129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99661034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3989184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029235534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046349794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2889406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982351217","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.77","title":"Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Political science; Secularism; State (computer science); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01665888651955795,"score_gpt":0.29817363911422906,"score_spread":0.2815147525946711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982351217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588802,0.00014590008,0.000011770684,0.0014225339,0.00022895762,0.0002046446,0.0000058278288,0.000015949996,0.039084245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980921,0.00046069646,0.00008328501,0.00028421325,0.00009067072,8.7027274e-7,6.4466553e-7,0.000005342636,0.0009821897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985722,0.0002596174,0.000174841,0.00021558073,0.00040307935,0.00037469686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994604,0.00007744743,0.0000754225,0.00009222801,0.00009188045,0.00020263183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009349527,0.00010347574,0.00018044228,0.00023407242,0.0010383864,0.00016427368,0.00024882331,0.0000745008,0.000034804056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055143402,0.0001063042,0.000052179937,0.00022251804,0.00018722484,0.000568448,0.00050386746,0.0002944079,0.000031837455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042733416,0.00009570728,0.6411155,0.000007969581,0.0000107477845,0.00016475221,0.34374812,0.0000422411,0.000067592235,0.01026803,0.0035157844,0.00053625833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016653612,0.00016780992,0.8752644,0.000061504456,0.000011064731,0.00002266026,0.018139334,0.00003144408,0.000020423178,0.10391812,0.0004204141,0.000277441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041578792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057702493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3256088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008128275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9648034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004595240","doi":"10.4000/theoremes.3393","title":"Frontières de la liberté religieuse et exemptions individuelles","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Théorèmes","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.010145923006379816,"score_gpt":0.3093641981176664,"score_spread":0.29921827511128657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004595240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27552527,0.013670617,0.00021105104,0.013003969,0.001508232,0.00025472968,0.000026133952,0.00012815598,0.69567186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86840755,0.016709028,0.0010995677,0.0005887218,0.00033780176,0.000017250588,0.000015906671,0.000027679873,0.112796485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777544,0.000802164,0.00024266256,0.00029552568,0.00039917234,0.00048506784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871707,0.00063505664,0.0001307057,0.00028858645,0.0000679892,0.00016061505],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010513471,0.00019219352,0.00023096033,0.000111456895,0.00027816513,0.00025685976,0.00038559258,0.00034377447,0.0008819023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021436294,0.00019589691,0.0001593205,0.00029970286,0.000592029,0.0006124657,0.000093902,0.00024992286,0.0019382553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011036319,0.00015396971,0.019012788,0.00004129579,0.00003593031,0.0000057922894,0.028574675,0.00011071031,0.0001169641,0.7757294,0.17074579,0.00546161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063681236,0.000098165634,0.036143064,0.00020191442,0.00012440208,0.000005591998,0.008285845,0.00012889289,0.00019950731,0.38572696,0.5680386,0.00041023892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019349162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024633165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5928823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013561567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041358563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008191152","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.33","title":"Reasonable Accommodation for Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; nobody; Reasonable accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Law; Scope (computer science); Opt-out; Conscience; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07395497734515308,"score_gpt":0.32980345894477453,"score_spread":0.2558484815996215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008191152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090261124,0.0043837233,0.023497622,0.10955895,0.0027758118,0.0011557431,0.00007756461,0.000062968684,0.7682265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960952,0.000067682966,0.0012888262,0.0016792082,0.00060916186,0.000002715993,0.0000026780488,0.000007075652,0.0002474795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919665,0.000057155085,0.00020977175,0.000085478154,0.00021317408,0.00023775984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872875,0.000076943434,0.00015760823,0.000061108985,0.00028237997,0.0006931917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004690151,0.00005746245,0.00011890066,0.000045925277,0.00042493924,0.00016156229,0.00033933108,0.000063370724,0.00007295635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005432626,0.00005779777,0.00007843105,0.00014136701,0.00018168928,0.0004197871,0.00000449496,0.00009122548,0.000013191034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020081523,0.0000065917325,0.0007613005,0.000018701412,0.0000106554235,0.00007350466,0.013430481,0.00006857212,0.00019592694,0.92245007,0.058781512,0.004182609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042619128,0.0001757187,0.00089196954,0.00006708849,0.00004122878,0.000008331099,0.0020483232,0.00007082274,0.00034226812,0.052000828,0.94376326,0.0001639878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06716219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29022092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012804841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012666489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93904966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121641526","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1198","title":"Privatizing Diversity: A Cautionary Tale from Religious Arbitration in Family Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Dignity; Religious law; Family law; Multiculturalism; Diversity (politics); Arbitration; Allegiance; Sociology; Israeli law; Identity (music); Religious identity; Political science; Private sphere; Public sphere; Private law; Islam; Public law; Religiosity; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03512001175155976,"score_gpt":0.2922466806274343,"score_spread":0.25712666887587454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121641526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61559695,0.00027672635,0.0044370047,0.00097477686,0.000274736,0.0002330789,0.000008012996,0.00008409291,0.3781146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741524,0.00032542198,0.00043959433,0.0015785716,0.00016135185,0.000013010445,0.000025934885,0.000008585883,0.000032279517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846077,0.00027021326,0.00026828,0.00025554837,0.00043563795,0.00030953292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993087,0.00034000885,0.000048785572,0.00016670456,0.000055235367,0.00008054156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617331,0.000112097536,0.00017950065,0.000070096234,0.00063417834,0.00004144178,0.00024749653,0.00017971215,0.0000629087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020874981,0.000115546674,0.000047017125,0.0002894444,0.036547314,0.00033942432,0.00017799708,0.00018949341,0.00003805052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050420847,0.00007488431,0.0032356097,0.0000031617526,0.0000031025122,0.000060969935,0.03407885,0.00001681309,0.000118403725,0.96186244,0.0004403615,0.0000549938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040569363,0.000036304707,0.0010164201,0.00003455585,0.0000074338964,0.0000016586298,0.0041445442,0.00011322921,0.00018754698,0.99307054,0.00082429353,0.0001577479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017094823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036231005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3818183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018714747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007543706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98945045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121682222","doi":"","title":"Are Muslims the New Catholics? Europe’s Headscarf Laws in Comparative Historical Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Immigration; Political science; Population; Secularism; Sociology; Referendum; Politics","score_opus":0.14085115607918847,"score_gpt":0.3737837721688877,"score_spread":0.23293261608969923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121682222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05900695,0.00078683527,0.000646446,0.0063367123,0.0014889172,0.00019738662,0.000005642282,0.000013259718,0.93151784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957071,0.00009432986,0.0003753831,0.000498713,0.00084683055,0.000004656367,0.0000014340138,0.000007369671,0.0024641731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977699,0.00051168667,0.00054224505,0.00017183673,0.00078637013,0.0002179515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717385,0.00024264847,0.000835427,0.00011253976,0.0014792988,0.0001562463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074011495,0.00015902214,0.00037090984,0.00018447542,0.000252555,0.00009394859,0.0007239029,0.0000629518,0.00015027945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016570142,0.00011511031,0.00016670447,0.00031781784,0.00040480812,0.00051927794,0.00005058112,0.00040338677,0.00004697987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015620519,0.000184526,0.0012383732,7.037183e-7,0.000051147337,0.000029401674,0.16901393,0.00006238589,0.00003616149,0.8141249,0.015073988,0.000028322056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015939163,0.00029869427,0.030553624,0.00011155381,0.000058577163,0.000054242057,0.10661481,0.00011421368,0.0005386236,0.106935926,0.75279194,0.00033385548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013948342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03238339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93670017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011909028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029334793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99261785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121980120","doi":"","title":"Dilemmas of Civil Tribunals in Formulating Their Positions Towards Religious Tribunals – The Case of Custody of Muslim Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Multiculturalism; Supreme court; Position (finance); Scope (computer science); Immigration; State (computer science); Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law; Economics","score_opus":0.018058702016493778,"score_gpt":0.31610987743466795,"score_spread":0.29805117541817416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121980120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98492014,0.0016094226,0.0005988581,0.0012276826,0.00008536067,0.00031183485,0.000034695873,0.0000072059743,0.011204802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486095,0.004885454,0.000019768062,0.000012617102,0.00014054694,0.000005171483,0.0000043099417,0.000010522478,0.000060678824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976233,0.0002984633,0.00065259036,0.00013201698,0.00034066287,0.00095296383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801576,0.00018461951,0.0011124978,0.00031568084,0.00031169175,0.00005977351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049265763,0.00012352952,0.00033368514,0.00016982688,0.0008235789,0.00005574592,0.0006041794,0.000109173176,0.000013477336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000828187,0.00008638623,0.00023928574,0.00020927849,0.00037881683,0.0002699551,0.000058849768,0.0005835187,5.297279e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019706751,0.0005469548,0.021583626,0.00003866208,0.00040242964,0.000033636592,0.053341392,0.00044113607,0.0023787874,0.8518095,0.00039429657,0.06883248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019908294,0.0005525582,0.01800816,0.00018527087,0.00014912889,0.0006546623,0.04142284,0.0001531014,0.0025942633,0.93403685,0.000028827048,0.0002235093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041650523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119659096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08222732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029416903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017902479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793050","doi":"","title":"Re-Framing the Sharia Arbitration Debate","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Framing (construction); Arbitration; Law; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.01674414092716521,"score_gpt":0.2733536071429327,"score_spread":0.2566094662157675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123793050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0721548,0.0004911385,0.0006781795,0.00465024,0.00056381774,0.00029247423,0.0000032464225,0.00015806097,0.92100805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921981,0.000045774,0.00027546013,0.0011696005,0.0010038156,0.000025991492,0.00001661529,0.000010640301,0.0052539823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874866,0.0001611161,0.00020321523,0.00019749966,0.00040249067,0.0002870329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941987,0.00010662173,0.00008938319,0.00021833972,0.00009003966,0.000075725875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071148615,0.00009387119,0.00008980773,0.000027533106,0.0010686471,0.0003482763,0.00027243647,0.0001024541,0.00024039701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016358698,0.00007243108,0.00006772066,0.00021586542,0.00021288091,0.00036633664,0.000024777033,0.00014659937,0.00032095498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005480773,0.000024116483,0.0011562889,0.0000037952452,0.000003958063,0.000002944966,0.0010716565,0.000058176443,0.0004677002,0.9763926,0.02026158,0.0005516534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068791077,0.00004981957,0.014204711,0.000048652615,0.000063444626,0.0000018503885,0.005536222,0.0004173479,0.0018318803,0.65359217,0.32311356,0.00045245048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106660925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18846388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92004335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086175314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009450299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8992879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124062011","doi":"","title":"Equality in Sheep's Clothing: The Implications of Anti-Discrimination Norms for Religious Autonomy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Clothing; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.0599814106725551,"score_gpt":0.36631858864637024,"score_spread":0.30633717797381516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124062011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33906916,0.00052226713,0.04437419,0.018908376,0.0005900614,0.0018514458,0.000017239588,0.00012803938,0.5945392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980232,0.00007957356,0.0008433372,0.00022379216,0.00014210044,0.00010785134,0.000014085503,0.0000064858095,0.00055954535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900633,0.00010642406,0.00030293706,0.00011950677,0.00018502944,0.00027975088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991679,0.0002903304,0.00013792013,0.00019902419,0.00014590882,0.00005888285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001745772,0.00006910768,0.00011644389,0.000077066776,0.00027274867,0.000034314548,0.00023507614,0.00008093578,0.00001828524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003420952,0.000048512367,0.00007320915,0.00025903457,0.00018367398,0.00033490526,0.000024985364,0.000052603173,0.000007355555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040345467,0.00011335841,0.03480425,0.000015594167,0.0000039278075,9.829816e-9,0.037688263,0.000019658464,0.0003071431,0.9194389,0.0031403888,0.004464481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009854499,0.000072958144,0.5708966,0.000031056403,0.00008017634,7.90356e-7,0.040089324,0.00052116235,0.0029808292,0.33935016,0.044582237,0.00040926438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016241308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062123025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6589541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013646849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016174169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145748135","doi":"","title":"权利的边界：宗教自由vs. 同性恋平权——从奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案谈起 (Rights in Conflict: Religious Freedom versus LGBT Rights)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Religious freedom; State (computer science); Balance (ability); Human rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.014337526460151667,"score_gpt":0.2851071456227762,"score_spread":0.27076961916262454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145748135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41237858,0.0100607835,0.004396453,0.013519235,0.006292319,0.0010507613,0.000021725096,0.00038885302,0.55189127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820762,0.010490684,0.000055556877,0.000060757797,0.0012102738,0.000013939078,0.0000037819634,0.000020630716,0.006068177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947173,0.0003587332,0.000553373,0.0004042538,0.00086495973,0.0031013854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998613,0.00031702517,0.00028385894,0.00028818022,0.00022339544,0.00027454924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023003623,0.00026797183,0.00032318046,0.00033655105,0.0008605567,0.00015354178,0.0006955653,0.00028559688,0.00014088105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028244333,0.00018327622,0.0002056596,0.00042952073,0.00044802018,0.00057085184,0.000041250863,0.0010067682,0.00026665625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002544065,0.00008598714,0.0005470861,0.000002001156,0.00005981956,0.000029296967,0.002312469,0.0000058562387,0.00025236566,0.98530096,0.0057373242,0.005412457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004416774,0.0003784345,0.0002059023,0.000060972397,0.000047610996,0.000061111044,0.0018368112,0.000006933234,0.00011677878,0.8623173,0.13016625,0.00038511108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037386056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3689472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002529595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023228927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96902406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146571481","doi":"","title":"Il metodo e l’uso degli strumenti religiosi di ADR negli ordinamenti statali","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Quaderni di diritto e política ecclesiastica","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Political science; Hostility; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.042210766171458365,"score_gpt":0.3029997649661019,"score_spread":0.26078899879464357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146571481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14031798,0.0141039975,0.03526266,0.275323,0.0073008244,0.007168077,0.0026905304,0.0031675866,0.51466537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879039,0.0036887352,0.0009177488,0.0029830504,0.0020604506,0.00009966595,0.0001851347,0.00025123637,0.0019100882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886481,0.0011719497,0.002035839,0.002299238,0.0030150125,0.002829874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937819,0.0010616655,0.0008714276,0.0011684845,0.0005561264,0.0025603701],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010062538,0.00134154,0.001618742,0.00035070154,0.0018368827,0.001772623,0.0020367184,0.00084675674,0.0024774706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026414134,0.0014284037,0.000869914,0.0017648881,0.0019016985,0.0011193632,0.0007667628,0.0010557137,0.0046537546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011071891,0.002678425,0.007157714,0.0013123216,0.0016914861,0.00065914966,0.060466066,0.00028074093,0.0071186395,0.61810184,0.26663366,0.032792795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011983781,0.006059027,0.020906918,0.001991063,0.010726264,0.00007381569,0.11586791,0.03007591,0.008466061,0.10254351,0.68009657,0.0112092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007105692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044358897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8475859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050408597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009851551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188745354","doi":"10.14288/1.0397499","title":"The Law of 1905 in Question : Legislative Compromise and the Role of Moderate Catholics in Pacifying the Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Law; Political science; Legislature","score_opus":0.008346671152526141,"score_gpt":0.20950075908854546,"score_spread":0.20115408793601933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188745354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9230074,0.0009320998,0.000032568325,0.0007013845,0.000030808085,0.00020636847,0.000015136157,0.0000047010662,0.075069495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873954,0.0010725675,0.000037063615,0.000020622896,0.000007762116,6.7137626e-7,0.0000020501072,0.0000022562497,0.00011747457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990913,0.0004070936,0.000103925355,0.000109585344,0.00018297124,0.000105088446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993894,0.00021702381,0.00011367054,0.00010974055,0.0001510146,0.000019129315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078709115,0.000020898608,0.00013519298,0.000011083143,0.0004302809,0.000064919615,0.00015929376,0.000049529855,0.0000020649325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006681605,0.000036345977,0.000039775747,0.0002107299,0.001639353,0.00017358284,0.000062873325,0.00008712983,2.0234036e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016701187,0.00027443384,0.022561174,0.00008382402,0.00004797029,0.000042209205,0.23867035,0.00043981022,0.0007798554,0.5286089,0.00017011262,0.2081543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021128757,0.00002827277,0.6080518,0.00022698092,0.00003595806,0.000004316229,0.1927273,0.0029652268,0.000027176786,0.19329253,0.00041370586,0.00011391184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8197372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9782697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5854906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003451407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007671511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60402644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207405667","doi":"","title":"Pluralismo y Multiculturalidad: Tribunal Arbitral Musulmán y Consejos Islámicos ('Sharia Courts') en el Reino Unido (Pluralism and Multiculturality, Muslim Arbitration Tribunal and Sharia Courts in the United Kingdom)","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Arbitration; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.025356518616590478,"score_gpt":0.326613611962779,"score_spread":0.3012570933461885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207405667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777563,0.002480407,0.00013626771,0.016517013,0.0008277984,0.0013506575,0.00008723467,0.00006701658,0.0007772804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98614424,0.010332894,0.00008283102,0.0011456647,0.001730199,0.00004631906,0.00025198844,0.00004764977,0.00021820872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98952246,0.002862196,0.0013532217,0.00068162277,0.0014015897,0.0041789324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966675,0.00096516084,0.0009651066,0.000337126,0.0005320788,0.00053300965],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009536239,0.00080525735,0.0007958546,0.00047123534,0.0017936017,0.001520814,0.00077676,0.00073286024,0.000039504474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010512961,0.00056245463,0.00029909823,0.0008075375,0.000899386,0.0018487399,0.00014464173,0.00379785,0.000013397505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045572422,0.0005794353,0.010281396,0.0000677889,0.00036354864,0.000029535591,0.09505771,0.000060419898,0.0024929056,0.88853276,0.0009669727,0.0011117873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031932484,0.0022627658,0.25205773,0.0012658967,0.0033500872,0.005890144,0.3928178,0.0090692835,0.00059095764,0.28088433,0.014930002,0.004948542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02886895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006964724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60764843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015575605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001188557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W323909182","doi":"","title":"The Changeless, the Changeable, and the Changing: Thoughts on the Future of Anglicanism(s)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Worship; Gospel; Diversity (politics); Globe; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Law; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02281746230808459,"score_gpt":0.29430677177576975,"score_spread":0.2714893094676852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W323909182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068687713,0.40625802,0.00006498572,0.4784831,0.00042718023,0.0028607235,0.000009400629,0.00007381606,0.104954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62504137,0.36150318,0.000007952203,0.011584054,0.0010670859,0.00024348598,0.0000016536167,0.0000077279665,0.0005434577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975688,0.0010806271,0.0002565622,0.00022108636,0.00046513285,0.00040779597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974079,0.0016429167,0.000252975,0.000514683,0.00011431118,0.00006718639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045684627,0.00016771561,0.00030454993,0.000021163456,0.0018148544,0.00007760311,0.0009264971,0.00009057465,0.000051528154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001038805,0.000048861515,0.00018558295,0.00068813196,0.0028375196,0.000045864977,0.0001398566,0.0002456655,0.000017146987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019284027,0.000019405394,0.0000067431283,0.000028131473,0.000013604084,0.0000011979267,0.0038255334,3.2274207e-7,0.0000014858505,0.96483326,0.0036913876,0.027559634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044488726,0.00013915774,0.00045345814,0.00046826748,0.000120761135,0.0000065098798,0.011937927,0.000005019425,0.000048905848,0.5042325,0.48198435,0.00015824451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035047616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014528692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61817265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031549647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057138226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334241474","doi":"","title":"Islam in Catalonia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle East Quarterly","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Catalan; Immigration; Islam; Arabic; Emigration; Ancient history; History; Political science; Capital (architecture); Ethnology; Economic history; Geography; Humanities; Law; Archaeology; Art","score_opus":0.023333462087865183,"score_gpt":0.26786227852362854,"score_spread":0.24452881643576335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334241474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8123,0.000031508014,0.00007383079,0.0007126086,0.0008052003,0.00013048877,0.000003139869,0.000059541835,0.18588364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965842,0.0000012695576,0.00017786623,0.00006045701,0.00029471,0.000014799744,0.0000071357194,0.0000067977626,0.0028527947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991765,0.0000533209,0.00013702853,0.00015707391,0.00022023128,0.00025585966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966383,0.000022308313,0.000036450343,0.0001540731,0.000043462147,0.00007989304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003309966,0.000068271685,0.0000819551,0.00008795975,0.00015473182,0.000084930616,0.00019450205,0.0000962518,0.00012846776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004147399,0.00006896025,0.00003704222,0.00019584721,0.0001512547,0.00020535686,0.00000467343,0.00014785271,0.00044805996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021327267,0.00032198624,0.033713628,0.00002000993,0.0000067144474,0.00003207283,0.32823578,0.0000017593343,0.0066634775,0.48897278,0.0035804373,0.13843004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004746376,0.0010222651,0.3515647,0.00015096864,0.00005098634,0.000026058384,0.19891873,0.00067033805,0.00052975817,0.30341387,0.13688524,0.0020207134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025823131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36338535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3375622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025298172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008368658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343313169","doi":"","title":"Postcolonial Anglicanism: One Global Identity or Many Contextual Identities?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archbishop; Bishops; Ecclesiology; Identity (music); Sociology; Publishing; History; Religious studies; Classics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08602599552791201,"score_gpt":0.37624609979677137,"score_spread":0.29022010426885936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343313169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13018827,0.06361036,0.0016066775,0.012199601,0.00072921667,0.0021588716,0.00007823459,0.0005990262,0.78882974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8535728,0.13396253,0.00020538497,0.0076998933,0.00039092475,0.00007026182,0.000015818701,0.000008554097,0.0040738457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734396,0.0006028077,0.0004487711,0.0003849552,0.00070194213,0.0005175554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878585,0.00020439277,0.00020857924,0.00029248922,0.00023198409,0.0002766794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010242915,0.00019108444,0.00053041487,0.000028705763,0.00070658745,0.00006528328,0.00066748355,0.0001689506,0.0038357063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024343156,0.00014040027,0.00025027446,0.0006088968,0.0014115756,0.00041719442,0.00014924788,0.0001495967,0.00050783576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004379551,0.00015893143,0.0018773273,0.00009065672,0.0000224291,0.00015273457,0.0004365149,6.3560215e-8,0.0000064092815,0.95959187,0.03227029,0.0053489613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023778349,0.0017282576,0.096025564,0.0017599656,0.0006252317,0.0004403538,0.0025016526,0.000007564248,0.00003363715,0.6418005,0.25096884,0.0017305466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003276725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041997274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7847559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018812949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002691155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37124968","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2023.01.002","title":"Where did all the women go? Representation of women and men in the Standing Comittees of the European Parliament","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CJC Open","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03481015929442325,"score_gpt":0.31970249619670854,"score_spread":0.28489233690228527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37124968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73244935,0.00010459628,0.000003826299,0.0032398652,0.000031999345,0.00067041226,0.0000014495371,0.000002466056,0.26349604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985296,0.00036986277,0.000011142836,0.0001393974,0.000025659052,0.000073660725,6.2994997e-7,0.000003892888,0.0008461568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985193,0.0008214738,0.00016791833,0.00009427674,0.00024081295,0.00015622743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.00016574847,0.0001352409,0.00020131015,0.00003716833,0.000026335223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023028357,0.000045320594,0.00010746792,0.000015193512,0.00016751909,0.00016420906,0.0006436881,0.00001640878,0.00006586716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010306635,0.000021608232,0.000016142472,0.00014765371,0.00022387796,0.00019746025,0.0001830229,0.00004720932,0.00000472463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021220054,0.00006838101,0.052106682,0.000020995549,0.00002912939,5.73457e-7,0.8752156,0.000020070705,0.00090888474,0.029001845,0.02379606,0.018810553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007798535,0.000073958625,0.38215336,0.00005934771,0.000011333393,4.3063426e-7,0.5508708,0.0000423772,0.00021843365,0.056137376,0.009556299,0.00009642932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01805625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017839158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33004668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009649536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002960469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W381326460","doi":"","title":"To Make Room for the Spirit to Work: Reflections from Lambeth Conferences on Theological Education","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bishops; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Archbishop; Ecclesiology; Spirituality; Theology; Law; Political science; History; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17730161519804388,"score_gpt":0.4258623109013206,"score_spread":0.2485606957032767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W381326460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035863683,0.030353721,0.008208103,0.23527953,0.0011293654,0.0059712036,0.000042690783,0.00032790093,0.6828238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92573434,0.026546132,0.0012976859,0.03977172,0.00061854144,0.00095472543,0.00002157825,0.00000853691,0.0050467663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982996,0.00041210456,0.00027872185,0.00037511913,0.000306612,0.00032787214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777985,0.001399398,0.00009297407,0.00030930957,0.00019959804,0.00021887729],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087155245,0.00014993137,0.00029599926,0.000040381667,0.00082039315,0.000044359655,0.00052617176,0.00011543383,0.0009962211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034639372,0.000081814505,0.00016874755,0.0005547393,0.0003130046,0.000035320605,0.000059430327,0.00013606808,0.0002768758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048109076,0.00013238317,0.00078903785,0.000011042578,0.000010887975,0.0000010880391,0.00092673075,0.0000035902167,0.0000069637035,0.79495263,0.09177243,0.111345105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079041274,0.00037586503,0.018464549,0.00030314512,0.000054793356,0.0000013152232,0.00071181916,0.0000011988474,0.000014480465,0.103275985,0.87653756,0.00018024782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016216905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032552916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88987064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006210333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022925672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214739763","doi":"10.1080/09637494.2021.2010906","title":"Religious anti-discrimination legislation and the negotiation of difference in Victoria, Australia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religion State & Society","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives; University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Legislation; Negotiation; Etiquette; Sociology; Constructive; Covert; Power (physics); Law; Tribunal; Political science; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.022626020965367755,"score_gpt":0.2973799517109,"score_spread":0.2747539307455322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214739763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912831,0.00094513147,0.0010473334,0.0019764334,0.00047628803,0.000632355,0.000014751792,0.00004807482,0.0035765376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912978,0.007829266,0.0001162822,0.00012271116,0.00006503882,0.00005931447,0.00003218266,0.0000096162885,0.00046782783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787897,0.00049262156,0.00044351298,0.0002485581,0.000696917,0.00023941562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990751,0.00024180108,0.00034425445,0.00016141495,0.00013220879,0.000045199613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017063622,0.00011533221,0.00020621122,0.00007060751,0.00057604874,0.00006251953,0.0001850425,0.0000686876,0.000012900192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013383603,0.00009878155,0.000120814,0.00054406037,0.00038100276,0.00017909196,0.00008265192,0.00020488343,0.0000022088243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024771562,0.00023671976,0.043778397,0.00008786135,0.000046384484,0.0000028949064,0.63304055,0.0027744311,0.0030693128,0.27681512,0.034898043,0.0050025713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011224235,0.00034195627,0.24135618,0.00012882409,0.00021492927,0.0000077592085,0.09804971,0.010625002,0.00081334845,0.6067584,0.029425735,0.0010538984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033058375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00193536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53499085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024963784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100997204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97338057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233248001","doi":"10.1080/14742250208574006","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Rowan; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06375113010546707,"score_gpt":0.36360474544892407,"score_spread":0.299853615343457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233248001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15022221,0.17088506,0.0042045303,0.27064422,0.05727818,0.010449187,0.00007232869,0.000115520466,0.33612877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97195995,0.004165539,0.00002712254,0.0007731102,0.0012678556,0.00002935409,3.451564e-7,0.0000073248234,0.021769386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985368,0.00019127544,0.00033411334,0.000089052526,0.0007087025,0.000140015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891627,0.00022542401,0.0003186317,0.00016476114,0.00033183928,0.000043050528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011551693,0.00007300249,0.00011693202,0.000052523144,0.00092511094,0.000110412206,0.0013379604,0.00002892095,0.0005508504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007217937,0.000038681956,0.00020317524,0.00009974914,0.00016146101,0.00011364702,0.000064739266,0.00014898537,0.000022763743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028854736,0.00031445303,0.00063174905,0.00000365483,0.00012179255,0.0000016798259,0.031153003,0.000054301476,0.000037790047,0.0035047685,0.9450407,0.019107275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008340465,0.0001082225,0.002536848,0.00004784915,0.00007532614,0.000017792127,0.010333315,0.00018494781,0.000025816536,0.0038134821,0.98194253,0.0000798079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010994715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004127595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82173777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009148237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025935151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7115299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237439551","doi":"10.5539/res.v11n1p203","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Review of European Studies, Vol 11, No. 1","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; George (robot); Classics; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; History; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.08180596522111333,"score_gpt":0.39458429952743185,"score_spread":0.3127783343063185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237439551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000047334623,0.74353117,0.0000072090575,0.00036640046,0.0033302503,0.0018069159,0.000012998587,0.000027065224,0.25087065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00035041652,0.9823071,0.00034221145,0.0018406259,0.0011511281,0.00003344652,0.000013683924,0.000035799916,0.013925601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588937,0.001669308,0.0012445806,0.00037427957,0.000524478,0.00029797474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777322,0.00030566394,0.00092128123,0.0005226989,0.020451255,0.00006694443],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007965426,0.00024805166,0.001294364,0.000056805275,0.00018221936,0.000009155713,0.00052003085,0.000015855923,0.00017993012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0651215,0.0001827366,0.00042635214,0.0003879302,0.0003402263,0.00015814317,0.00030030494,0.00006480754,0.0016986405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002127514,0.000051207302,0.00015407089,0.18585336,0.00017622813,6.975223e-7,0.00069406244,3.2586577e-8,0.000006029668,0.0011999123,0.7959905,0.015871754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022147562,0.000103235325,0.00015527011,0.17750761,0.0003900232,8.105563e-8,0.00052657275,1.2889046e-7,0.0000066498574,0.0000699265,0.820859,0.00015999422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010199151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023810766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23877591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006962178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005743777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239035810","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u7032","title":"Bedford-Jones, Rt Rev. Michael Hugh Harold, (29 Sept. 1942–18 April 2021), a Suffragan Bishop of Toronto, 1994–2008 (Area Bishop of York Scarborough, 1994–2006, of Trent-Durham, 2006–08)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History; Art history","score_opus":0.03215305352131045,"score_gpt":0.29572967269622225,"score_spread":0.2635766191749118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239035810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015123452,0.10145932,0.00013367613,0.00028730312,0.003853858,0.0019661984,0.003286082,0.00015717624,0.8737329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2542418,0.4428743,0.0013289303,0.00039879122,0.005795253,0.00021500219,0.0037915949,0.00046081044,0.29089352],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898656,0.00061686535,0.0028590858,0.0015398957,0.003374773,0.0017437891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99335986,0.0005493283,0.002906036,0.0017020311,0.0008488799,0.0006338506],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019725664,0.001267304,0.0030587162,0.0007694996,0.0005074112,0.00014717122,0.0021217868,0.00231848,0.0019204679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051034294,0.0012533927,0.0013172543,0.0015831555,0.0018696024,0.0006303687,0.00038817603,0.00087773526,0.000029206345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032874086,0.0008885824,0.0045370082,0.0017639172,0.00054656924,0.00003144472,0.015778644,0.000026266904,0.00013705356,0.0047802785,0.92651266,0.04466886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032031091,0.0007644067,0.0021141232,0.005826857,0.0013469625,0.000015103175,0.009389485,0.00007944831,0.0015781262,0.0021126044,0.9712529,0.0023168372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29300547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17105477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5828394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008893559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019667533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239577129","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-95943-3_234","title":"Canterbury Christ Church, University College, Graduate School","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Global Affairs Canada; Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance; Camargo Foundation; Canada Council for the Arts; Killam Trusts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032798877562944924,"score_gpt":0.25658948776855695,"score_spread":0.22379061020561203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239577129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025855828,0.00044057655,0.000040088376,0.00019358443,0.0010497712,0.00092679786,0.0006017045,0.0001761669,0.99631274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66406524,0.0006186244,0.000038047965,0.00012512397,0.00041244258,0.0000020138184,0.000053932727,0.000046534653,0.33463803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974288,0.00011279694,0.00033758543,0.0006480974,0.00090260326,0.00057013927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982252,0.000117317715,0.00034967772,0.0005724014,0.0003142491,0.00042113653],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041280015,0.00046244284,0.0005477024,0.00036025132,0.0006386645,0.00006949316,0.0006931881,0.00058037695,0.0008080388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066502806,0.00050170824,0.00036350443,0.00004502762,0.0006326669,0.0000021989683,0.00016971004,0.00045992105,0.0010931347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048260375,4.6790515e-7,0.00007720644,0.00004264823,0.000078588295,0.00011335711,0.0011022666,6.3234853e-7,0.000019941457,0.99157834,0.005406781,0.0015315206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008030081,0.000097568,0.00059800275,0.00023791658,0.00019939594,0.000007439179,0.001678775,0.000013219403,0.00001944343,0.91079223,0.08462654,0.0009264453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012783191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012926708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6638067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055902085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001066906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244626071","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-4208-0183","title":"behind-closed-doors-how-faithbased-arbitration-shuts-out-womens-rights-in-canada-and-abroad-7-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doors; Arbitration; Political science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.018901141213635574,"score_gpt":0.31870015659048867,"score_spread":0.2997990153768531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244626071","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014541659,0.00045108117,0.000006153774,0.0020124149,0.0022920968,0.0016395104,0.9623809,0.000114868686,0.016561305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04142005,0.0006638416,0.0000935755,0.0007228702,0.0022518637,0.00012681202,0.93211323,0.00005264138,0.022555105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423116,0.00048455212,0.0009967264,0.0011632481,0.0020133415,0.0011109731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973467,0.00021738677,0.00071493554,0.00091814174,0.00026760568,0.0005352468],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006750478,0.00077612064,0.0008979433,0.00045086854,0.0016401829,0.00047963025,0.001097655,0.00056796474,0.0025149975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000661321,0.0005716157,0.00017755807,0.00020334547,0.00055862655,0.00079582183,0.00015926447,0.0006297744,0.00016816717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025287089,0.00028149033,0.00009019704,0.00006388124,0.000080387064,0.00013487539,0.00051425234,4.6222948e-7,0.000010614745,0.014749826,0.9839116,0.00013717437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014924938,0.00009618126,0.00036988943,0.0002788506,0.00014804065,0.0000023350894,0.0001399292,0.0000021557191,0.000025724266,0.046571843,0.9500481,0.00082445587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03386345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019743994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013948856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250679855","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330","title":"Multicultural Jurisdictions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":507,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Autonomy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Normative; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Corporate governance; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.023909360684186417,"score_gpt":0.24409119410231037,"score_spread":0.22018183341812395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250679855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043139924,0.00011882499,0.00011670176,0.000057931124,0.00060523686,0.0003961413,0.000087536915,0.0002631101,0.9983114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001351787,0.0005373566,0.0000480133,0.0000433741,0.0006008012,0.0000011172194,0.00009942284,0.000018329829,0.9972998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987251,0.00011666241,0.0001268659,0.00032635563,0.00038745,0.00031755335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999078,0.0000659492,0.00014660032,0.0002487399,0.000250184,0.0002105321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009925772,0.00020444013,0.00021871093,0.00013847035,0.00088980305,0.000087660235,0.00043366957,0.00043627885,0.000007959563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029313836,0.00023329325,0.000205312,0.000023299357,0.00053468294,0.00013424433,0.000102329665,0.00029476287,0.000045887864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009411813,0.000008610344,8.806387e-7,0.000009907605,0.000024981717,0.000052195515,0.0012617607,0.0000012242288,0.000003078351,0.5158191,0.48244116,0.00036771112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032403014,0.0000152485345,0.000012089541,0.00005055899,0.00017425712,0.0000028126024,0.0010342458,0.000011345811,0.00000878443,0.000027658976,0.9980628,0.0002761913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008475131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039770224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5157914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070675276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046644325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309241678","doi":"10.1017/9781009177856.041","title":"M. J. McDonnell and S. T. A. Pickett (1990)","year":2022,"lang":"war","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.02903325346538531,"score_gpt":0.222273121037746,"score_spread":0.19323986757236067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309241678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012596331,0.00069107045,0.0000633103,0.00017069107,0.0008960048,0.0007113488,0.00032973246,0.00014271331,0.99573547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062473647,0.0047959685,0.0000429156,0.00015368396,0.00030599796,0.0000016280034,0.00007463739,0.000050202903,0.9321013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728847,0.00023199689,0.00028645643,0.0009058806,0.0007514478,0.000535729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983523,0.00017654183,0.00038395717,0.000499456,0.00017846812,0.00040931534],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003768465,0.00049599865,0.00052828685,0.00027815602,0.0018526131,0.00014042834,0.0007756589,0.0004919183,0.00009863612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032423446,0.00064076873,0.00028402157,0.000027932474,0.0013389952,0.00024583386,0.000844521,0.00065976783,0.00003467352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009670547,0.000021914006,0.00001542152,0.0000850344,0.000101797836,0.00025598798,0.0017036577,0.0000024542633,0.000019326724,0.94449896,0.051160537,0.0020382085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082598254,0.00014161492,0.000062497034,0.00007354235,0.00045008474,0.000011488347,0.0025280803,0.000038866776,0.000031804764,0.00018857374,0.9949438,0.0007036954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019538142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019190006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94431037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042439965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022879597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369141","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198854081.003.0002","title":"Social Context and Legal Developments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Politics; Patriarchy; Inequality; Race (biology); Ethnic group; Sociology; Political science; Relation (database); Gender studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03637972906945683,"score_gpt":0.2983762670957816,"score_spread":0.2619965380263247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033377528,0.00025046393,0.000008008127,0.00127396,0.00027131222,0.00015658776,0.0000058224673,0.000052838182,0.99794763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08656943,0.00044782372,0.000037140922,0.00042745782,0.00023164981,0.000007472707,0.00002428995,0.00001352155,0.9122412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991125,0.0000210968,0.00013314708,0.00018426531,0.00041107112,0.00013794556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997506,0.000028808978,0.00007510045,0.000041151976,0.000048394024,0.000055919063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020369966,0.00010819803,0.00014039004,0.00006438517,0.0008459857,0.00008309533,0.000113910275,0.00015240208,0.0037801731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017109,0.000111412104,0.00004811939,0.000014589584,0.0002129548,0.000098409844,0.00007545473,0.0001289408,0.000066171866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034655334,0.0000028392237,0.0000068801473,0.0000033983438,0.000012767353,0.0000061963115,0.0024582562,9.023061e-9,2.610465e-7,0.9231899,0.047056716,0.027259333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011576,0.000009361362,0.000033435703,0.0000036463,0.0000146007915,7.8801133e-7,0.0011034606,1.7031361e-7,4.368558e-7,0.08045857,0.9181177,0.00014209026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005916541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009551483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87106097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014756848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002853376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322712695","doi":"10.17656/jlps.10219","title":"Political Governance and Citizen Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Cultural pluralism; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); Cultural diversity; Sociology; Political science; Minority rights; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01281529821310935,"score_gpt":0.28098591399954403,"score_spread":0.2681706157864347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322712695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03672583,0.00007181848,0.00004087085,0.004754885,0.000119898265,0.000048566006,0.0000031254074,0.00003338447,0.95820165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595077,0.000008388112,0.00007595423,0.0004369872,0.00007321795,0.0000076004953,9.1424215e-7,0.0000013460677,0.013444851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994734,0.00005283342,0.000041763593,0.00007456379,0.0002178483,0.00013960862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984026,0.00003638232,0.0000111318695,0.00003681369,0.000011668043,0.00006376644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001390838,0.000022388987,0.000031709682,0.000008704628,0.000591571,0.000024262192,0.00006286084,0.0000112350635,0.0006898494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027387445,0.000020144242,0.00001170744,0.000056770932,0.00010103932,0.000045812238,0.00003684182,0.00003352127,0.000009496701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014339669,0.000007857264,0.00042890673,4.5165817e-7,6.856214e-7,0.0000015893155,0.00069360354,1.7105981e-7,0.0000054731677,0.9829145,0.015573612,0.00037168834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001403683,0.0000235129,0.0039707595,6.118358e-7,0.0000033655697,0.0000017052474,0.0029831133,0.000027954557,0.000029177472,0.82167614,0.17108229,0.000060998318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02064493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021167526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059511287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003129916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366826253","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2023.10","title":"A Political Theology of Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Politics; Link (geometry); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer network; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.10214871443126222,"score_gpt":0.4050267276625238,"score_spread":0.30287801323126157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366826253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049187757,0.00003075848,0.00003060129,0.0041024424,0.0007390014,0.000095038384,0.000004134963,0.00014850475,0.9456618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969425,0.000015295918,0.0000213408,0.0010275618,0.0011514846,0.000010270245,0.000009470321,0.000007889336,0.0008141632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889255,0.00018961722,0.00015615081,0.00012221746,0.0002618262,0.00037765637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995746,0.00015205145,0.00004643505,0.000073898584,0.00007962912,0.00007340789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041844713,0.0000580837,0.0001407552,0.000020853586,0.0004744351,0.000021151933,0.0001627494,0.00016256698,0.00007305204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008658894,0.000057801262,0.00008715648,0.00022310544,0.0025178567,0.000088465524,0.000047122212,0.00006662417,0.00013674957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006266863,0.000023306713,0.0001141625,0.000005782034,0.000006989685,0.0000031018458,0.022204762,2.0914581e-7,0.000110192865,0.97193515,0.0053581423,0.00023195888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015632084,0.000024353996,0.0007696564,0.0000036483527,0.00001405337,2.1451366e-7,0.010824554,0.0000034607478,0.0001847866,0.96613395,0.021809153,0.00007587282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020929089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081278775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94775474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043150998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007206293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98559064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386506683","doi":"10.1515/9781772126716-006","title":"4. Group Rights and Collective Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trinity Western University","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.018081018512653407,"score_gpt":0.21403547039808754,"score_spread":0.19595445188543414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386506683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030032068,0.0001135152,0.000011072299,0.000028666582,0.00015232697,0.00035569392,0.000023319097,0.000023688597,0.9989914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013950239,0.00009543961,0.000058366128,0.0000098152805,0.000049391496,3.9359222e-7,0.0000190244,0.000009167973,0.98580813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999009,0.00007060907,0.00010465645,0.00030068707,0.00035929997,0.00015571699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921274,0.00022270293,0.00019930107,0.0001675435,0.00008967703,0.0001080123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010314675,0.00015562985,0.0002541239,0.0001334456,0.0011070438,0.000021833612,0.00029300578,0.00022433093,0.00061732373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007240257,0.00017938382,0.000106547726,0.000008840347,0.00069786375,0.00008908069,0.00015901994,0.00017436703,0.00000502507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058011028,0.000010862058,0.0000017855496,0.000014031046,0.000070146,0.000014236638,0.029748403,4.2635435e-7,0.0000017349349,0.9568865,0.01292995,0.000263972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032684862,0.000061437226,0.000005230864,0.000030218962,0.00012576776,8.611378e-7,0.00023855116,0.000002811255,0.000007643504,0.22348349,0.7755397,0.00017741918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47194865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27049208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7626098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017840724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112195456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85145974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386628760","doi":"10.5040/9781350297296.ch-13","title":"The Permissible and Contested Boundaries of Religious Dress Worn in Schools: Contemporary Examples of Religious Restriction in Canada, France, Kenya and Turkey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.019380986493882216,"score_gpt":0.26611971101549897,"score_spread":0.24673872452161677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386628760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12282501,0.08657771,0.000013879652,0.0018359654,0.0011595566,0.0019722742,0.00014687788,0.00022028084,0.78524846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90516675,0.05106163,0.000030364225,0.000030138317,0.000059828435,0.000031866264,0.000009296964,0.00010360276,0.04350651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981724,0.00021735897,0.0005620295,0.00031074838,0.0004709037,0.00026653497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870366,0.0004869534,0.00040797572,0.00021705331,0.00009959217,0.00008478548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058949494,0.00019277992,0.000473789,0.0003419924,0.0001812616,0.00011664315,0.0002015268,0.00024916165,0.000007579084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006660189,0.00015283684,0.000031618925,0.000568245,0.00066267356,0.000085412896,0.000050616025,0.00021236208,6.887338e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008432312,0.000026532318,0.2096916,0.0001699206,0.000032578882,0.000025039026,0.005108375,0.000004785859,0.000013133181,0.011713501,0.77152467,0.0016055707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005575309,0.0003111418,0.2141838,0.0051598344,0.00009682912,0.0000054702073,0.1286268,0.0001473335,0.000087501714,0.04549942,0.5987904,0.0015161672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7823418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000196349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002951388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62325054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386984679","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96073-6_9628","title":"Canterbury Christ Church, University College, Graduate School","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; Camargo Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04810982172630491,"score_gpt":0.26887726705078485,"score_spread":0.22076744532447995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386984679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001379047,0.00020125236,0.000029305835,0.00026699196,0.0011190816,0.0007265825,0.0007550949,0.000406933,0.99635684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62761945,0.00086618855,0.000028146978,0.00008439049,0.00049687823,0.000004191945,0.00006511404,0.00006179617,0.37077388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973409,0.00011143233,0.00034902612,0.0006416146,0.00095378765,0.0006032214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828196,0.00014957167,0.00030425683,0.0004910484,0.00029761187,0.00047556625],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050166657,0.0004450432,0.0005025003,0.00045267562,0.0008790207,0.00007185494,0.00067071326,0.0005495888,0.0004229769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011290814,0.00049315696,0.00035725135,0.00007609068,0.00072585413,0.0000018085863,0.00019519236,0.00045218598,0.0011880002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035773286,3.5893638e-7,0.000035712903,0.000035805937,0.000083980085,0.0002841273,0.0013051138,5.989044e-7,0.000013009636,0.988528,0.007966957,0.0017105619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048998627,0.000058534806,0.0004965495,0.0001930343,0.00015331876,0.000004561323,0.001824003,0.000010558111,0.000011243176,0.96602917,0.03004397,0.00068508164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016795468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025594117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6274815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048432747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070210744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391034185","doi":"10.62221/ctj.2024.103","title":"Evangelical Identity in Anglicanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cranmer Theological Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wycliffe College","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Identity (music); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Theology; Religious studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03523199778017817,"score_gpt":0.3958618546038265,"score_spread":0.36062985682364834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391034185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3554001,0.006372766,0.010525899,0.010619224,0.0020947233,0.00018431863,0.0000030020215,0.00018134274,0.61461866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972682,0.00073487824,0.00016377629,0.000278501,0.0007294972,0.0000041856756,6.96125e-7,0.000005053438,0.00081521855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866253,0.0003178551,0.00020178055,0.00015051474,0.00036819195,0.00029914064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955463,0.00016925811,0.000025237347,0.000059941285,0.000042988144,0.00014792643],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00141988,0.00007142684,0.00011193857,0.00011168037,0.00024632737,0.00033561717,0.00026282878,0.00012956378,0.0012424341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035453844,0.000050052677,0.00010799288,0.00033488913,0.00035720825,0.00040368622,0.00003324856,0.00037958825,0.00026429535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012908155,0.000052594754,0.0017655536,0.000003942046,0.000007277111,0.00035040596,0.0038740444,0.000004174897,0.00012964844,0.9670388,0.005149647,0.021610964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017844772,0.000044723984,0.008993618,0.00003487832,0.000013624089,0.00006184816,0.0025476683,0.00009438897,0.000015013716,0.9723148,0.015597553,0.00010347612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033221397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013139922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6418681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010991889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009400145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600234","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1440","title":"Insulating the Church: Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Canada St. Mary Cathedral v. Aga and the Suppression of Public Law in the Construction of Religious Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Religious freedom; Sociology; High Court; State (computer science); Constitutional court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05914093009292188,"score_gpt":0.31107352325989424,"score_spread":0.25193259316697236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5027645,0.2124977,0.0000352985,0.06714738,0.00077803916,0.0036910695,0.00014749066,0.000082803046,0.21285568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91321576,0.086167715,0.00003745472,0.00045736248,0.00003511367,0.000023782002,0.000023545508,0.0000075230128,0.00003177312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585634,0.0025235144,0.00057272665,0.000111828354,0.0007043402,0.0002312179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709857,0.0019359606,0.00030857182,0.0004022039,0.00022191898,0.00003275764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006423319,0.000111851965,0.0003626397,0.000040726,0.0005217899,0.000042271633,0.00054220634,0.00007205583,0.000025519825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005134245,0.000058418154,0.00010330755,0.0006192784,0.0019795243,0.0001535417,0.00010236966,0.00024415823,2.4821466e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011338782,0.00001275888,0.002085418,0.0011959468,0.000023186489,0.0000013013145,0.01980753,0.000012028292,0.0000312773,0.9669096,0.0035628888,0.0063467287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034410323,0.00029523566,0.040051837,0.024862679,0.0007910666,0.00007918376,0.20113581,0.0012114062,0.0003077241,0.18091825,0.5458023,0.0011034617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7658362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7246913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7859914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042072985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000460001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.729364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392239603","doi":"10.1177/00405639231225145","title":"The “Hierarchy” of Truths in a New Context","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theological Studies","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Hierarchy; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.09666824437422654,"score_gpt":0.42093700434134174,"score_spread":0.3242687599671152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392239603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22160648,0.1594738,0.00025962273,0.02797218,0.00086434133,0.00037579524,0.0000017787019,0.00013992365,0.58930606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98655385,0.009318742,0.000018124816,0.000068588975,0.000097263546,0.0000075555195,1.2460497e-7,0.0000015375547,0.0039342423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934614,0.00015222444,0.00012734678,0.00008970734,0.00014176055,0.00014279471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986594,0.0012170471,0.000017905553,0.000052555304,0.000029616476,0.00002353151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006857998,0.00004413198,0.00010927587,0.000022436818,0.00018217634,0.000025650534,0.00014168095,0.00003513466,0.00003496797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088654476,0.000021406993,0.0000431273,0.00019187368,0.0008554141,0.00003314894,0.000036859572,0.000060960367,0.000021534059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013409761,0.0000083025525,0.000617153,0.000004328359,0.000014121537,0.000003161187,0.017518215,0.0000011444353,0.000014309145,0.9134063,0.007086723,0.061312824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008978568,0.000060958948,0.0028723078,0.00003002734,0.000007398241,1.9394929e-7,0.027462319,0.000014552367,0.000037724963,0.94187623,0.02750742,0.00004105406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002121073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007952446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76494735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029639332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057742676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44376516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392882722","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1743","title":"Embracing interdisciplinarity: CJAS's strategic vision for the future","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.10817680141131042,"score_gpt":0.39010500205853915,"score_spread":0.28192820064722873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392882722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7481422,0.009921501,0.009651126,0.045460824,0.010537079,0.0012371443,0.00015225599,0.00006681774,0.17483105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948028,0.00013199927,0.0023270964,0.00015617261,0.0019853262,0.000019153882,0.0000046334635,0.000011902557,0.0005609355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972784,0.00027726323,0.0006189354,0.00045627065,0.00038175267,0.0009873924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971212,0.0008067886,0.00033491387,0.00015252558,0.0005534815,0.0010310967],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006732744,0.00022746297,0.0002476627,0.0005840302,0.0060750865,0.00270464,0.0011879222,0.00016107918,0.000076848526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067140715,0.00016916965,0.0002325435,0.0017661155,0.007355504,0.0015758488,0.000016450824,0.00032162332,0.00000495225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032855372,0.000019313427,0.00034533598,0.00008402255,0.000028315266,0.00015332847,0.05262718,0.00032065393,0.00021325787,0.9366143,0.0017090229,0.007852443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023979855,0.004716079,0.0018175525,0.0006202673,0.00013927746,0.000774094,0.27495745,0.007327405,0.00024480664,0.6855185,0.02316309,0.00048167916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016873792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86149645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001095591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018884627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394963210","doi":"10.1080/17449057.2024.2322866","title":"Navigating Between National Unity and Political Expediency: The Federal Government’s Response to Substate Identity Policy in Nigeria and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnopolitics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions","keywords":"Politics; National Unity; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Identity (music); National identity; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.026886081037990717,"score_gpt":0.3733240901830262,"score_spread":0.3464380091450355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394963210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95509195,0.000102612314,0.00003357796,0.031478748,0.00017915374,0.00013700672,0.000092400776,0.000022107879,0.012862414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980541,0.000016594006,0.00004468944,0.0011247627,0.0003557499,0.000008617054,0.0000035282008,0.0000074021254,0.0003845699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816567,0.00031531168,0.00018285387,0.00017194463,0.00074670825,0.00041749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986189,0.0009809873,0.000020554988,0.00006544943,0.00007269338,0.00024138716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013377566,0.00008422363,0.00009131639,0.000029575547,0.00048250612,0.00028584208,0.000116471805,0.000058248774,0.0000051451843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027505537,0.000073441486,0.000014196349,0.00022958762,0.00031079302,0.00020800519,0.00007782447,0.00021483336,0.0000017904537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009256673,0.000006660972,0.03745802,0.000019392497,0.00000626732,0.000010884578,0.027631147,0.0000015621383,0.000038886716,0.93314165,0.0011533529,0.00052293006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033049824,0.00005735551,0.27994347,0.00013775346,0.000015121726,0.0000037911193,0.113121554,0.00013518253,0.00023510946,0.5981428,0.0075356592,0.00034172196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92230666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9414163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33499885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001162989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013957738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37110958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396709633","doi":"10.1515/9783111026176","title":"Religion and Diversity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Royal Historical Society; King's College London; Royal Irish Academy; Harvard University; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.020836198188623332,"score_gpt":0.27728478432715725,"score_spread":0.25644858613853394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396709633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001828824,0.0019556382,0.000021350534,0.00075901824,0.00045797744,0.00010343982,0.0000033361612,0.0001200336,0.99656093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037790008,0.005484179,0.000025432742,0.00016978082,0.0003369293,8.681535e-7,0.0000107699425,0.000006338867,0.9901867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941903,0.000016588525,0.000058690242,0.0001645356,0.00024908516,0.00009207945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978656,0.00003400473,0.00002271685,0.00006136147,0.00003488466,0.00006048018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017219856,0.000069043075,0.000081999,0.00006712669,0.0003619743,0.00007846448,0.00008683673,0.00020704462,0.000082591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022215896,0.00006201064,0.000042377273,0.000029406943,0.00017150055,0.000051155308,0.00018805581,0.0000933933,0.00031610674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.0324417e-7,8.1032886e-7,0.000008742044,0.000012264111,0.00000300846,0.000003003571,0.0013592653,1.0009631e-8,6.52671e-8,0.4925431,0.5050815,0.0009877707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001873467,0.0000059195504,0.0000064384217,0.000023910665,0.000029677936,2.1899525e-7,0.00010626873,9.442024e-7,2.044361e-7,0.46520865,0.53454083,0.000058219008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009998328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009625971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029459365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011803456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017406908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399174286","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-59940-8_4","title":"Contentious Terms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03211912112290058,"score_gpt":0.2990131772485159,"score_spread":0.26689405612561534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399174286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010232523,0.0009125844,0.00004292477,0.0010955778,0.0012500081,0.00017211736,0.0000074662917,0.0002238623,0.99629444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011319269,0.000912365,0.000020533402,0.00019518989,0.0005877718,0.0000040001896,0.000016011023,0.000021784273,0.9869231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992176,0.0000049883097,0.00013561298,0.00019461183,0.0003151303,0.00013205403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996931,0.000024461777,0.000042232732,0.00011358653,0.000057784222,0.00006884003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013793726,0.00011182814,0.00012570697,0.00008810399,0.0001310244,0.00013888036,0.00013885794,0.00025236918,0.002251195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015078686,0.00009384645,0.00014043883,0.000013517754,0.00020374512,0.00004706583,0.0000273943,0.00012182092,0.0037499869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.157897e-7,0.0000017106273,8.851914e-7,0.000009609358,0.000013558139,0.000013865106,0.0005633935,2.8826754e-8,0.0000010520877,0.8599235,0.13574809,0.0037236314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000224844,0.000006282245,6.274848e-7,0.000029927702,0.000025759478,4.3211224e-7,0.000099157645,9.034701e-7,6.1273613e-7,0.48953655,0.51020324,0.00007405335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026599881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00839969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37445512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007658015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006862533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400534338","doi":"10.4324/9781003458128-6","title":"Religious Freedom or Multiculturalism?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Religious freedom; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economic freedom; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03763336751302306,"score_gpt":0.3116862492017393,"score_spread":0.2740528816887163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400534338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000052071728,0.002234411,0.000014198481,0.0025754794,0.0020355177,0.00041590718,0.000024210662,0.00052349793,0.9921716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005810046,0.006990692,0.000318892,0.0002852928,0.0015798473,0.0000127989115,0.000046493376,0.000052058094,0.9849039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829555,0.000015338805,0.0003131494,0.00043278682,0.0006489908,0.00029417896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991646,0.00011211992,0.00010119387,0.00025137162,0.00019836485,0.0001723935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021088225,0.00028715443,0.0002861106,0.00014288045,0.0002631829,0.00028153296,0.00032634413,0.00059075543,0.0025099379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009470916,0.00019073003,0.00023866245,0.000053462718,0.0003996628,0.000105204344,0.00007403888,0.0002756888,0.0048268503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064556675,0.0000036257222,1.9619232e-7,0.00002067849,0.000024404859,0.000048894264,0.0043099397,0.0000011386556,0.0000021283502,0.6434523,0.3513282,0.0008020341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009843141,0.000027812142,4.0275586e-7,0.00011803887,0.000102633334,0.000003823163,0.00093395996,0.000012071473,0.0000027316412,0.22186457,0.7765463,0.00028920706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011985866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033155706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42521814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002089358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020943931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401004569","doi":"10.1515/9781772840742-017","title":"15 Structural and Lateral Violence toward Metis Women in the Academy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03701746362573467,"score_gpt":0.24834513872802963,"score_spread":0.21132767510229494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401004569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022324154,0.0006031498,0.0000022258291,0.0001562795,0.00011916117,0.00027942483,0.00003215857,0.00002905696,0.9764544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73229676,0.0013403584,0.000027377642,0.000057093803,0.0001281124,6.15688e-7,0.000004615898,0.000011384586,0.26613367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999105,0.000054787437,0.000102259066,0.00021710467,0.00032186377,0.00019899903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996675,0.00006135715,0.000087714216,0.000091973874,0.00003298648,0.000058461344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028220363,0.00012970321,0.00018294877,0.00010373444,0.00015778495,0.00005371606,0.0004282722,0.00023912985,0.000025780739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006703457,0.000116845215,0.000058480513,0.000008063125,0.000548372,0.000075334014,0.00014035052,0.00028071334,0.0000056051276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026322552,0.0000017627573,0.000038787934,0.00007637707,0.00002939839,0.000038481776,0.055889226,9.570629e-7,0.0000029547462,0.9353855,0.00070219766,0.007807979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038583527,0.00006217913,0.001042222,0.00043709454,0.00014619691,0.0000046146847,0.023841703,0.000020865693,0.000011145611,0.6795121,0.29418322,0.0003528392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027814109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013761562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7103207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012544743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045048244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97865975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401804016","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96110-8_9527","title":"Canterbury Christ Church, University College, Graduate School","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Canada Council for the Arts; École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales; Strong","keywords":"Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03313847094213582,"score_gpt":0.2642028773735161,"score_spread":0.2310644064313803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401804016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011129967,0.0012324785,0.000023189074,0.00034164672,0.0013260389,0.0006852642,0.00078542397,0.00030600597,0.99518865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6152755,0.0007930051,0.00002783159,0.00008417629,0.0005739686,0.0000033893714,0.000043711952,0.000051435007,0.38314694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975104,0.00007023442,0.00033770595,0.0006837936,0.00086080795,0.0005370625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985487,0.000091722264,0.00020953741,0.00045203764,0.00024344493,0.00045455148],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003958388,0.0004657581,0.00047457838,0.00043880474,0.00064492685,0.00010942548,0.0005968662,0.00053492375,0.0006773235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050155035,0.00049186166,0.000393751,0.00006159097,0.0007289006,0.0000017933825,0.000192928,0.00054443366,0.0011809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003083206,3.5907686e-7,0.000013075378,0.00006653734,0.000106450236,0.00037725514,0.0014975509,3.523283e-7,0.000015024637,0.9891067,0.0074002445,0.001385595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027921394,0.00005025719,0.00007782002,0.00026009165,0.00021842157,0.000007950776,0.0013301765,0.000011479887,0.000012001801,0.90751874,0.08965681,0.0005770581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012344957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015846886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6151642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006045732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006839567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406322564","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5033024","title":"Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause: A Case for Constitutional Guardrails on Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.012300208094892226,"score_gpt":0.294177215335637,"score_spread":0.28187700724074477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406322564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84797496,0.0018308096,0.089476876,0.0063524665,0.002499445,0.0013360891,0.000054529675,0.000027198274,0.050447658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988571,0.00024342233,0.000021305763,0.000051205327,0.00022583443,0.00000651887,5.8166233e-7,0.00000307247,0.00059098285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986947,0.00013468717,0.00024960644,0.000111957765,0.0002837323,0.0005253132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922144,0.00026140662,0.0002239654,0.000095429394,0.0001711237,0.000026641903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019527583,0.00008276925,0.00012886061,0.00010660549,0.0012844669,0.000049142072,0.00015228083,0.00007486916,0.0000054135253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019240077,0.00004668972,0.000101897014,0.00023659042,0.000787085,0.00011874989,0.000016465134,0.0004054492,1.7049892e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008765024,0.000022369915,0.0005994402,0.00000928363,0.00006490057,9.907579e-7,0.0022422909,0.000027043176,0.0003655096,0.99544436,0.00044988873,0.00068629795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001173895,0.00021321334,0.00021782955,0.00014476074,0.00012546137,0.00022612176,0.012993873,0.00014498449,0.00091432314,0.98158693,0.0021684105,0.0000901955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015047719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015937056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15088215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048391795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012397611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408167329","doi":"","title":"Quand les juges disent la laïcité. Perspectives belges et françaises","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01708898399631996,"score_gpt":0.26210479783948515,"score_spread":0.24501581384316518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408167329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038235113,0.02167304,0.016832039,0.042436548,0.00037898863,0.0005099476,0.00010161235,0.00024127809,0.914003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4008709,0.015681686,0.0034728653,0.00011716872,0.00007215818,0.000052243697,0.00011290251,0.00007675451,0.57954335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98732466,0.010096044,0.0004946975,0.00089557277,0.0006959908,0.00049304863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929377,0.0035985971,0.0005039248,0.0010668576,0.0016569685,0.00023595672],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041983994,0.0004875439,0.00052009814,0.00032860445,0.0011866218,0.00060015195,0.0011328356,0.00056537637,0.003179669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029945634,0.00049729925,0.0003486209,0.00074238825,0.0020207686,0.00023051673,0.00036022393,0.0004940418,0.0002136698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008079472,0.00065184984,0.0023606566,0.0001223181,0.000097247495,0.0000035835158,0.061344747,0.0000060909233,0.0001268524,0.87430114,0.014206661,0.046770807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091352,0.0000015318263,0.011169323,0.00387809,0.00026119483,0.0000037878474,0.016302487,0.0004181921,0.0018676091,0.026655443,0.93761414,0.0009146503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05421475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09280857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021246591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067532505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415837968","doi":"10.1628/978-3-16-167219-4","title":"Religiöse Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"Mohr Siebeck eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Compulsory arbitration; Religious freedom; Constitutional court; Constitution; Legislation","score_opus":0.01710827414514607,"score_gpt":0.27731692045704737,"score_spread":0.2602086463119013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415837968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018396492,0.004532937,0.00036608573,0.0009965232,0.005796989,0.001464672,0.00009316253,0.00042320663,0.98614246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028422806,0.0017961216,0.0002679213,0.0013423589,0.0029209412,0.00013469058,0.00020286923,0.00010642156,0.96480584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99369097,0.00054126733,0.0012674283,0.0014781064,0.0016857883,0.0013364144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963177,0.0005468511,0.0007619236,0.0012983071,0.00053563976,0.0005395825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011837614,0.0010329281,0.0012036816,0.000723695,0.0016673752,0.0006389893,0.0016020085,0.0017377523,0.00053798984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004649644,0.0010822888,0.0008454293,0.00031954044,0.0013807014,0.0001498939,0.00044400696,0.0011453092,0.0037474982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085107706,0.000074926946,0.000035338366,0.00029268378,0.0002480246,0.00008474066,0.0060317544,0.000006494149,0.00004589008,0.4743536,0.4978932,0.020848226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007681834,0.00013873639,0.000053410186,0.00081307604,0.00069326436,0.0000025538016,0.0007782014,0.000045281227,0.00008833634,0.14459758,0.85094255,0.001078844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008525688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004280147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35304934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093831215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042363186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416046982","doi":"10.1093/9780198922469.001.0001","title":"Dignity in Judgment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Polity; Autonomy; Faith; Islam; Constitutional court; Constitutional law; Constitutional right","score_opus":0.023066898728900255,"score_gpt":0.3179620914323274,"score_spread":0.2948951927034271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416046982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004115427,0.00019383382,0.00006013607,0.0007031417,0.00036409404,0.00022605824,0.0000027513445,0.00004351531,0.99840236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021064337,0.00057645154,0.000036669884,0.00026864125,0.00014570486,0.000010985689,0.000021444708,0.0000032497182,0.9968304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992924,0.000044587123,0.00012977247,0.00014290925,0.00025555678,0.00013477786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972266,0.00007015774,0.00003658276,0.00009547739,0.000039686354,0.000035411056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002937258,0.000073051306,0.000120315846,0.00012533442,0.00008925905,0.000039480925,0.00015338436,0.00021222855,0.00037337287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073507814,0.00006950611,0.000049602477,0.00006720702,0.00008495696,0.000038901897,0.00003047637,0.00011019734,0.000100838246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.75677e-7,0.000009665663,0.000030714567,0.000009576531,0.0000016850134,0.0000014049167,0.00065603195,3.3469883e-7,7.43875e-8,0.56916934,0.42635983,0.003760571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007826997,0.0000049845326,0.00007238968,0.000057776226,0.000007719977,1.2943876e-8,0.00029017887,0.0000011570836,0.0000015797194,0.37575987,0.6236447,0.00008138188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013227765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06906759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19728486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043851518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010130045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99334323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416336189","doi":"","title":"Introduction : les juges, exégètes de la laïcité","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012723055311673375,"score_gpt":0.2434152141681467,"score_spread":0.23069215885647334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416336189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019364194,0.0045850403,0.025256451,0.045323353,0.0006202236,0.00038054108,0.000046937206,0.0002278967,0.9216231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23765369,0.012627799,0.012057201,0.0001787834,0.00045468187,0.00004167651,0.00036065583,0.000060437455,0.73656505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99061424,0.0068025435,0.00061487156,0.00083230674,0.00063166505,0.00050437526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992949,0.0031453855,0.0005381722,0.0011714236,0.001955703,0.00024029812],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008200351,0.00044072495,0.00043340662,0.00029933837,0.0013923229,0.0004778801,0.0010164892,0.00078052294,0.0013817588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003044988,0.00050541735,0.0003210351,0.0003634577,0.0021058302,0.0002674858,0.0003209215,0.00067828177,0.00020269479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072623134,0.0001626932,0.00040128635,0.000086759,0.000052901058,0.0000032562968,0.0057642343,0.000011575308,0.00026664487,0.79758614,0.01417072,0.18148653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004106723,8.603398e-7,0.0010860892,0.0013647414,0.00019231135,0.0000117552645,0.0005682586,0.00076467573,0.0039028213,0.12441444,0.8667308,0.00055255013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02183224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151773775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8525601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004625493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005920786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416581200","doi":"","title":"Avant-propos : et si le juge était une personne trans","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Unjust enrichment","score_opus":0.018388797411055,"score_gpt":0.2500692054230868,"score_spread":0.2316804080120318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416581200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010643533,0.0022513792,0.035316654,0.100172445,0.0009915691,0.00073053373,0.00014775527,0.00023658207,0.8590887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34365752,0.006654237,0.006333037,0.00043974104,0.00006962515,0.000037200363,0.00045607725,0.0000657531,0.64228684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913906,0.0050869943,0.0008216455,0.0010730327,0.000949142,0.0006786242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314123,0.0019300318,0.00061346416,0.0014788978,0.0024793467,0.00035705467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006164036,0.00060414395,0.0006519444,0.0003145672,0.0017063634,0.0004447342,0.0015255525,0.000707869,0.0015922568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010448977,0.00068202853,0.0005643851,0.00045396792,0.0020272194,0.00041915802,0.00029826636,0.0007653558,0.0004995421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013769745,0.0003390221,0.00007027564,0.00014150685,0.000085993466,0.000009243502,0.033652782,0.000009626083,0.0005598201,0.907527,0.0052487804,0.05234217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016101688,0.0000031980228,0.0004980619,0.004076653,0.0003772658,0.000012883249,0.0035289673,0.0029621278,0.0038307973,0.14024892,0.84148043,0.0013705192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04467304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09885551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83623165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003025235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011366507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416898183","doi":"10.1515/9782766306800","title":"Laïcité versus multiculturalisme?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Nonconformist; Indignation","score_opus":0.03781930942436768,"score_gpt":0.3279790824044908,"score_spread":0.29015977298012313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416898183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044913995,0.00088809704,0.000090190115,0.0031891568,0.013304421,0.0007212867,0.000032460426,0.00017305386,0.9815564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02149674,0.0046708123,0.0002816596,0.0004183805,0.0015256368,0.000031590498,0.00016573719,0.000018197237,0.97139126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966896,0.00022527981,0.0006240728,0.00077420886,0.0010320187,0.000654829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742603,0.0009986011,0.00029868496,0.00042124497,0.00058977527,0.0002656385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041118448,0.0005259641,0.00056379323,0.00020879423,0.0010914968,0.00039288934,0.0008170756,0.0010513122,0.0028165497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007986434,0.0004482375,0.0005055681,0.00040101114,0.0008386888,0.0002889434,0.00018891612,0.00041784643,0.0013379508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000648698,0.000042797357,0.0000029841567,0.00005809367,0.000083364765,0.000004950023,0.004192788,0.0000048906068,0.0000040553696,0.6123703,0.37537318,0.0077977516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021446922,0.00013117037,0.000043478274,0.0002575516,0.0005073216,3.5348188e-7,0.008217417,0.0001015101,0.000038625687,0.020167261,0.9675814,0.00080921466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01849621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01514534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5922082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072272896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014813867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W574873243","doi":"10.1093/0198297467.001.0001","title":"The Ethics of Nationalism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Denial; Politics; Political science; Secession; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.055534556806220346,"score_gpt":0.3655998987856322,"score_spread":0.3100653419794119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W574873243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.310405e-7,0.0005414873,0.00013015942,0.007785235,0.0003883182,0.000111076806,0.0000031200466,0.000021082005,0.991019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068210927,0.0053682015,0.000044505006,0.00022134185,0.00039996652,0.0000034787608,0.000016674841,0.0000056262456,0.9932581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887145,0.00009601182,0.00014733557,0.00007616867,0.00071601704,0.00009302716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844444,0.00092398527,0.00012658435,0.00010378283,0.00037380232,0.00002741373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011671149,0.000053778567,0.00007441422,0.000033115193,0.00048555163,0.000037726753,0.000245218,0.00034111284,0.00019080285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006249054,0.000035747664,0.0000674474,0.00004850956,0.00048498347,0.000030416288,0.000016322307,0.0002126381,0.00004170172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.6961085e-7,0.0000020796642,0.0000011864335,0.0000031046516,0.0000040318055,1.5968658e-7,0.0016349545,3.431378e-7,1.2428592e-7,0.6732248,0.32381353,0.0013151108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017451644,0.0000027002447,0.0000041166345,0.000008371887,0.00000580635,7.024655e-8,0.0002995866,8.317967e-7,8.1121954e-7,0.4460709,0.5535623,0.000027053213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033466062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019790715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22974879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009061962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013724926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884582592","doi":"10.1093/acprof%3aoso/9780199548781.003.0020","title":"‘Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial and Religious Expression’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Durham Research Online (Durham University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Denial; Legislation; Convention; Sexual orientation; Immigration; Economic Justice; Human rights","score_opus":0.06364867257891318,"score_gpt":0.3799549774679924,"score_spread":0.3163063048890792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884582592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003278715,0.0015930556,0.00006552611,0.0020576636,0.00032995676,0.00093354733,0.0001864818,0.0004565886,0.99109846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021618197,0.024716701,0.0012669307,0.00009719739,0.0017514422,0.000002186622,0.0002070458,0.0001857175,0.9501546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944317,0.0014334397,0.00027884796,0.00093854725,0.0018479862,0.001069478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977485,0.00030534662,0.0002244816,0.0006475324,0.00041344843,0.000660669],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014207165,0.0003760155,0.0005202037,0.0019931113,0.00095732935,0.00020044578,0.0010519417,0.00096067885,0.0007799888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063793466,0.0004029513,0.00017320523,0.0014853805,0.0014397586,0.0002191481,0.0004289517,0.0010294489,0.00016273331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014054653,0.00038801844,0.00019007508,0.000100032834,0.000041494888,0.00063114485,0.0021688037,7.8783154e-7,0.00026239766,0.023792671,0.9619476,0.010336433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094657356,0.00015323299,0.00015766986,0.00030727655,0.00003895898,0.0000059403887,0.004658933,0.000007578098,0.000056895606,0.005898922,0.9872884,0.0004796086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04959283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06486188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040943883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005064555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009900546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893754234","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3894009","title":"Religious-Based Discrimination Against Muslims in North American and European Prisons: \"Comprehensive Discrimination\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Racism; Prejudice (legal term); Islam","score_opus":0.04452360140394422,"score_gpt":0.27686156662738215,"score_spread":0.23233796522343791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893754234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73571414,0.00025908882,0.0048327665,0.016356865,0.0001276991,0.0013045969,0.00012900597,0.0012126699,0.24006318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639696,0.00070120936,0.00031105927,0.0010321144,0.00017134396,1.7573932e-7,0.0009004919,0.00044154626,0.000045084475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997094,0.0010806854,0.0003393921,0.0005265649,0.00054771546,0.00041164912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986984,0.00006636113,0.00019565749,0.00023219944,0.0004929881,0.0003143528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005763799,0.00017706947,0.00019431919,0.00028700958,0.0018236723,0.000710772,0.00064058806,0.000040372077,0.00014753411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012843426,0.00019289057,0.000052151012,0.0012146031,0.00061936193,0.00037387534,0.00036311132,0.0002446666,0.00059069897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002528223,0.0005647359,0.0012245913,0.00029459407,0.000044906727,0.000097751836,0.19815707,0.000952089,0.0021344607,0.017885134,0.07830783,0.70008403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021680153,0.00075325306,0.08069958,0.000097627046,0.000054622804,0.0000077216355,0.059064675,0.0044200704,0.00015521485,0.0005050026,0.8512438,0.00083042384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005302345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022663428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.772936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001946315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013609744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894239672","doi":"10.5284/1082074","title":"Statement of Significance, Church of St Andrew, Sedbergh, Cumbria","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archaeology Data Service","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.07985433071839042,"score_gpt":0.34069983572435725,"score_spread":0.2608455050059668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894239672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8506677,0.0008450292,0.005655915,0.07444761,0.0005990965,0.0011864023,0.0021267394,0.00012392829,0.06434756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963296,0.0005018335,0.0012565831,0.0012651262,0.00010004047,0.000006360891,0.00047933438,0.0000068043405,0.000054298736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863666,0.00022173875,0.00033124787,0.0002855151,0.0003068435,0.00021797951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988577,0.00016272547,0.00020052562,0.00042207446,0.00024971692,0.00010725175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057948806,0.00007767522,0.00021028513,0.000042615167,0.00006955409,0.0000040005166,0.000976393,0.00007254659,0.00021725905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021804213,0.00007780143,0.000018752484,0.00047357677,0.0005322876,0.00021923236,0.0005255976,0.00007789196,0.000019605812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006573103,0.00046756235,0.09250251,0.0012619906,0.00030481862,0.000028002001,0.328486,0.00032743788,0.025479889,0.42244387,0.114075385,0.013965229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075600627,0.0017055942,0.071173646,0.00020346402,0.00057584216,0.000005358553,0.10968197,0.0110739935,0.012881749,0.13094498,0.6527351,0.0014582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03596826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023213277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53865975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001292733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002482578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927566101","doi":"10.25949/19443584","title":"Accommodating Sharia: : A Feminist Institutionalist Analysis of Sharia law in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Macquarie University","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sharia; Multiculturalism; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Normative; Comparative law; State (computer science); Family law","score_opus":0.0357463213568792,"score_gpt":0.2999728607094842,"score_spread":0.264226539352605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927566101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8494529,0.000015399446,0.000013583378,0.00019692478,0.00027239186,0.00023003585,0.00019110061,0.000012568577,0.1496151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951357,0.000013534227,0.000033465556,0.00006527545,0.00004033622,6.2236853e-7,0.0014735388,0.000003956374,0.003233548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987465,0.00022365009,0.00021856515,0.00024044179,0.00039341024,0.00017742692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990206,0.00022371142,0.00030366145,0.00016969963,0.00021805908,0.00006427104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053653424,0.00012967178,0.0003211687,0.00036199688,0.000718541,0.00007090076,0.00038561202,0.00019918066,0.00017786305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017307585,0.00012354305,0.00008832537,0.0015125177,0.00075201236,0.000105358034,0.000045883186,0.00017201185,7.7342537e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020040707,0.000021134758,0.0073289643,0.000027962029,0.00023511499,0.000012158774,0.013466212,0.00008205335,0.0000020779144,0.977647,0.00093439285,0.000042508807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009873691,0.000104603714,0.3445985,0.00066649204,0.012906709,0.0000016636037,0.27058828,0.0065013845,0.00007064049,0.046376374,0.30609936,0.0022122993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93127066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038494947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073830184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55265087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6943905196","doi":"10.17176/20170910-214602","title":"Reconciling Religion: Lessons Learned from the Triple Talaq Case for Comparative Constitutional Governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"intR2Dok (Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Democracy; Constitutional law; Democratic governance; Constitutional amendment; Indigenous rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.19697312150635152,"score_gpt":0.4210426070470573,"score_spread":0.2240694855407058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6943905196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2612179,0.006970501,0.039272226,0.16398473,0.009465984,0.004464134,0.0037300345,0.0004940325,0.5104005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913877,0.002277422,0.0014627805,0.0006843995,0.0014735971,0.0001160866,0.000064501895,0.000015592073,0.0025179086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978498,0.00021503931,0.00041843197,0.0005211404,0.00052601635,0.00046957488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967131,0.0013740811,0.0005832797,0.0007186494,0.0004447419,0.0001661752],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012396199,0.00022506434,0.0003375569,0.00013519377,0.0047583613,0.0012019473,0.0009224903,0.00019564568,0.00019084706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020222147,0.00018086535,0.00020245247,0.00042595205,0.0026349768,0.0009492525,0.00011238631,0.0002508953,0.00009483485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017697908,0.00007362035,0.0007638421,0.000007846964,0.00006657046,0.00006858934,0.007922732,0.00005914114,0.00012318362,0.8170323,0.15854962,0.015155595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032404575,0.0001224149,0.0015507486,0.00016463784,0.00015503739,0.00006399525,0.01389353,0.0014794146,0.0009812026,0.2670224,0.71064913,0.0006770411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047659997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07067419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73016983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020013584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075213535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958698245","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.29455850","title":"Additional file 2 of Parents’ experiences of family-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Physical activity; Qualitative research; Component (thermodynamics); Systematic review","score_opus":0.12213469900048048,"score_gpt":0.4305695091504111,"score_spread":0.3084348101499306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958698245","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028221167,0.0042873947,0.0000058023747,0.000070503724,0.000010387909,0.0005354736,0.9909434,0.000014712109,0.0038501646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92236185,0.00015326859,0.00016135593,0.00009297013,0.000021474729,0.018082343,0.0586609,0.0000051843244,0.0004606263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892014,0.00046728738,0.00018784036,0.000117457785,0.00023807844,0.00006918846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916638,0.007719401,0.00027188778,0.00009454479,0.00022566799,0.000024712373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013479793,0.000059089092,0.0002871938,0.000051008512,0.000084556916,0.0000147969195,0.0001424139,0.000028033557,0.4635304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040732644,0.000050047893,0.00013259944,0.00025136038,0.00007971197,0.00016160938,0.00002770637,0.000029461302,0.00002843874],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023734344,0.000087221175,1.3706564e-7,0.106960535,0.000013931295,1.2836254e-7,0.009692932,1.2758066e-7,0.0000013037101,0.00016061233,0.8829518,0.00012891303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003710996,0.000040047227,0.00012997129,0.9342358,0.00013972163,5.5787723e-8,0.064126074,0.000062046725,0.0001328277,0.00044323714,0.0005665238,0.00008659915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101404126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041046427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93228245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025948311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016766052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967062088","doi":"10.5167/uzh-176679","title":"Fresh expressions of church and the mixed economy : potential and challenges for church development","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecclesiology; Protestantism; State (computer science); Diversity (politics); Expression (computer science); Local church; Mixed economy","score_opus":0.020006843168728226,"score_gpt":0.2282853725649506,"score_spread":0.20827852939622238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967062088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8121081,0.0016471039,0.0014901676,0.0013113286,0.00011463773,0.0010073183,0.000009791039,0.0000099622775,0.18230161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923777,0.0016909181,0.003612558,0.000011753536,0.000026581682,0.0000026282348,0.0000043907658,0.000004117511,0.0022693728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991043,0.00031842792,0.00011456784,0.00022264106,0.00011142188,0.00012861905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910045,0.00048724876,0.00015174129,0.00011588544,0.00006804262,0.00007664287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000805791,0.000076421515,0.00020778722,0.000062774285,0.0007970091,0.000045809607,0.00027917424,0.000052102707,0.0000147519995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023490502,0.0000666277,0.00003718501,0.000042966494,0.000579008,0.000245157,0.00032458123,0.000054783835,6.5940884e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002253382,0.00042640074,0.014244924,0.00096042233,0.00044979315,0.000015177222,0.33767363,0.00002890384,0.02050599,0.577998,0.01230792,0.03313545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013510818,0.0006108957,0.45979548,0.0004040995,0.00036726956,0.00002352586,0.30935416,0.00071592705,0.0023552505,0.08045071,0.13158269,0.00082916254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015341532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039886212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49754727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010168214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009310214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.613003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6969042174","doi":"10.5683/sp2/ukrbnb","title":"Southminster United Church - Integrated Project Dossier (2014)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Borealis","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Church history; Local church; Christian Church; Intersection (aeronautics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.04080066042096831,"score_gpt":0.3245915215429907,"score_spread":0.2837908611220224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6969042174","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000049938835,0.00008420592,0.0000147723595,0.0009204854,0.00035325918,0.0006019204,0.94613194,0.00013374069,0.0517547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000033800097,0.0011176793,0.000049440543,0.00091479113,0.0010168001,0.00007044557,0.99565303,0.000023309709,0.001120714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769044,0.0003780993,0.00033629115,0.00045076257,0.00071922306,0.0004251767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879783,0.000082684484,0.00022775782,0.0004457393,0.00025542738,0.00019053233],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043002798,0.00029399252,0.0003387492,0.0004015288,0.00036624543,0.0003089317,0.0006764758,0.0005893826,0.00034755678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005861449,0.00024848053,0.00014313843,0.00088122685,0.00035808873,0.00012841134,0.00008558124,0.0004169911,0.00033865467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027089507,0.000037759248,0.0000053671893,0.000043492135,0.000033192104,0.000031883654,0.0031234534,2.5939283e-7,9.518805e-7,0.0010169209,0.99482894,0.0008506949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024040428,0.00004928994,0.00005492784,0.000048057616,0.0001091769,0.0000011601517,0.0022244516,0.0000059912727,0.0000022131987,0.00035752135,0.99659187,0.00031493025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.742935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16942142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57351357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016985777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090054126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981294190","doi":"","title":"DS 87-9 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 9: Design Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering design process; Engineering education; Design education; Design elements and principles","score_opus":0.03822509788729904,"score_gpt":0.25124561642559573,"score_spread":0.21302051853829668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981294190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059336744,0.0001349508,0.011397346,0.0015746375,0.00059108186,0.0019627295,0.00009719946,0.00018613477,0.9834626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52437,0.0037466558,0.019848535,0.00008160978,0.00032675438,0.0000023537232,0.000055081677,0.00009167831,0.45147732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962061,0.00017841517,0.00055768905,0.00085203844,0.0016852573,0.0005205229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946027,0.0005988622,0.0016744726,0.00078426953,0.0020212391,0.0003184549],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013818847,0.0005276136,0.0009813714,0.00065119175,0.00078206084,0.000067843925,0.004653523,0.0015239534,0.0007750641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010715681,0.0006000358,0.0007017733,0.00044824212,0.0026473443,0.00056663295,0.0009042259,0.0011328381,0.000053291827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015937034,0.0013115989,0.00022583785,0.0004536846,0.00041643425,0.00003816737,0.0016472051,0.00019699612,0.009005517,0.49368122,0.48637405,0.0050555943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014880656,0.0049776942,0.023969334,0.023205765,0.0070604766,0.00013532978,0.02508363,0.003331807,0.0070576384,0.111273706,0.76948684,0.009537123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015314999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007310349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5319852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001417227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026805117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981811280","doi":"","title":"FGA TRADES Now Offers Geothermal Service in North Bay","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bay; Service (business); Geothermal gradient; Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01911128584208732,"score_gpt":0.2695322499663488,"score_spread":0.25042096412426146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981811280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012053186,0.00022766527,0.000007714167,0.0010913992,0.0003598248,0.00031115074,0.000019961404,0.0001746348,0.99660236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026535477,0.0005368196,0.00007377825,0.0011050137,0.00038246185,0.000045489127,0.000072226576,0.00014400958,0.97110474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879056,0.00013740137,0.00013531171,0.00024410927,0.0004265696,0.00026603325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996487,0.00003508964,0.000082901075,0.00015456861,0.000011101826,0.00006766781],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018860128,0.0001390823,0.00017679806,0.00022609117,0.000121335564,0.000043398464,0.00035235577,0.00016597805,0.042780146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014710179,0.00013242097,0.000056582256,0.00046584092,0.00007863966,0.00005163633,0.00003587838,0.00014771552,0.00018808494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077162185,0.000089333036,0.018290607,0.000055974273,0.00001937491,0.000014745961,0.009334795,0.000024182324,0.0000013854676,0.02378926,0.946096,0.0022766374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002506586,0.0000144286305,0.0040066694,0.000012590462,0.000013149873,2.58584e-7,0.0050897524,0.000017056394,6.0625644e-7,0.00040087142,0.9899648,0.00022917692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13142428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9144758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7830515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012954629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016697652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9580949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981856866","doi":"","title":"First T2K measurement of transverse kinematic imbalance in the muon-neutrino charged-current single-$π^+$ production channel containing at least one proton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules; Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron; Science and Technology Facilities Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Russian Foundation for Basic Research; Russian Science Foundation; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; CERN; Centres de Recerca de Catalunya; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; European Regional Development Fund; U.S. Department of Energy; European Commission; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Compute Canada; Western Canada Research Grid","keywords":"Kinematics; Measure (data warehouse); Proton; Transverse plane; Production (economics); Detector; Channel (broadcasting)","score_opus":0.08372497980558352,"score_gpt":0.2546293683266229,"score_spread":0.1709043885210394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981856866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91796803,0.0002454782,0.0010727171,0.0033968075,0.00070668873,0.0018018632,0.000010027166,0.00004692561,0.074751474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984814,0.00014090238,0.000046595556,0.000036271747,0.00016869999,0.000015463067,0.000009529172,0.000011482224,0.0010896728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977258,0.00039777995,0.00030329902,0.00043469123,0.00074640167,0.00039205616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900097,0.000043138927,0.00019315352,0.00036350542,0.00031826063,0.00008097475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007590624,0.00017995575,0.0002990888,0.00020552646,0.0002899998,0.000048653048,0.0003441662,0.000084884065,0.00011149614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008117958,0.00017168338,0.00010747088,0.00065336,0.00014506157,0.00030800755,0.00009039186,0.00018545213,0.000062569445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031286736,0.009016012,0.48378116,0.0066944757,0.0004853597,0.00077890494,0.41567564,0.0003173335,0.030038709,0.039356194,0.0010576292,0.009669924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014668081,0.0009134599,0.68667656,0.0068414994,0.00068148196,0.000106187304,0.15895145,0.0019837366,0.026412895,0.0018182504,0.09843362,0.0025128045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003495791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012730286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25672418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004474091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010840108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71037984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982316797","doi":"","title":"I can see clearly now: Survey results from neonatal staff on mydriatic use in retinopathy or prematurity screening","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cyclopentolate; Mydriatics; Tropicamide; Pupil; Retinopathy of prematurity; Drug administration","score_opus":0.08981827219949577,"score_gpt":0.3117457954843088,"score_spread":0.22192752328481302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982316797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05444352,0.000070395916,0.0008498505,0.0011336693,0.00036595552,0.0019271405,0.017279353,0.0002166344,0.9237135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20214304,0.0031463876,0.0039033557,0.00001179146,0.00022147811,3.1359892e-7,0.0018110335,0.00014023425,0.7886224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232155,0.0036931937,0.0001950916,0.0010799279,0.0017946414,0.00091556704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510986,0.002327153,0.00056854496,0.0011220259,0.00037052543,0.0005018667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025735106,0.00034530705,0.00066676334,0.0017622628,0.0015272457,0.00016379659,0.0023324476,0.00055017596,0.00052220776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002450416,0.000425807,0.00020767475,0.00069592416,0.0023751527,0.0005070028,0.0009020276,0.001260636,0.00012457768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016663194,0.0007899137,0.017115755,0.00020824713,0.00041552738,0.0034822098,0.0690885,0.0000319675,0.00008398612,0.006153718,0.86864597,0.017320998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009688385,0.0011576939,0.17479505,0.0029366608,0.00014145125,0.0000019595063,0.059330463,0.00060944,0.000009746788,0.0025321827,0.74734217,0.0014547987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.795202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9446478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15767929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055656384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012348687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983208623","doi":"","title":"LL.D. citation for Hon. Justice Archie Campbell, 19 June 2007","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Commission; Citation analysis","score_opus":0.02656444999705496,"score_gpt":0.31280402744817926,"score_spread":0.28623957745112427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983208623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005291146,0.0008118804,0.17531794,0.00038973452,0.0049060215,0.0020976753,0.0006885937,0.00048205114,0.8152532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004108458,0.0011699193,0.0106283,0.0008507058,0.004687638,0.00024985248,0.0016995673,0.0005876481,0.9760179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947892,0.00057944417,0.00090592785,0.0012885766,0.0010693643,0.001367488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960011,0.0016869995,0.0008547491,0.00062250596,0.00014553947,0.0006890961],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011101081,0.00081405835,0.0007998078,0.0019292244,0.00021809165,0.00030413346,0.0015444049,0.00045930562,0.004846994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094449107,0.00082882424,0.0006359573,0.00030454775,0.0013657338,0.00016323397,0.00031846776,0.0007290219,0.0019938105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033755388,0.00016759046,0.00007588559,0.00035763235,0.00021457236,0.000034895016,0.016375974,0.0000076287333,0.000052022897,0.13942307,0.84148014,0.0014730629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012192054,0.00024755206,0.0000747465,0.00074453215,0.00037401932,0.000009177567,0.0015487757,0.00053953764,0.00007315584,0.028448224,0.9658114,0.00090971985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11870649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2922347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17352821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021125628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038827237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984835915","doi":"","title":"Sacramento","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"scholarworks - UTEP (The University of Texas at El Paso)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Sister; Immigration; Politics; Faith; Rage (emotion); Alien; Human rights","score_opus":0.03285015552833374,"score_gpt":0.24576913682631046,"score_spread":0.21291898129797673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984835915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3020049,0.0003957926,0.0009543113,0.0012288855,0.00036494742,0.00029502794,0.000005449692,0.00009172851,0.69465894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840848,0.00038427743,0.0006467591,0.00011401532,0.00006109201,1.625374e-7,0.000003872137,0.000006618066,0.0146984365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.00020032823,0.00010529763,0.00019828226,0.00038035883,0.00026202784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925804,0.00006769981,0.00012713321,0.00029689702,0.00012782672,0.00012241345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062363484,0.00009432763,0.0001262065,0.000068820875,0.0010634739,0.00003025819,0.00066628616,0.00014673495,0.0016855091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009011956,0.000087071436,0.00012809788,0.00026468246,0.0006450164,0.00037152623,0.00017174566,0.00018526176,0.00044106063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005420609,0.0006378259,0.17492752,0.00005064062,0.00028632773,0.000080111306,0.1815146,0.000057015706,0.00062973844,0.43950823,0.16166648,0.040099442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023801953,0.00023995816,0.30372727,0.00015071454,0.00041523168,0.000005065226,0.063476905,0.00011695409,0.00080215087,0.059399053,0.5684535,0.0008329986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013711767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068857265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68207985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016559834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007431308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987627174","doi":"","title":"Theorizing Religions as Vestigial States in Relation to Gender and Law: Three Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Judaism; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Islam; Politics","score_opus":0.03046045040961023,"score_gpt":0.26397638999772355,"score_spread":0.2335159395881133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987627174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3954053,0.0000035747014,0.00027225897,0.000402558,0.00008086453,0.0004942824,0.0000033570022,0.00007423449,0.60326356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984986,0.014232472,0.000483184,0.00017193884,0.00006423461,0.000005265248,0.000008275505,0.0000098559,0.000038789545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989899,0.00014500711,0.000115184754,0.00026562525,0.00020672327,0.00027760302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994037,0.00019140808,0.00005249422,0.00012859332,0.0001053767,0.00011843353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019981917,0.000111159825,0.00011369553,0.0027488896,0.0004071792,0.000116876356,0.00015373416,0.00010144453,0.000023820343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020202712,0.00011829258,0.000033768694,0.002512041,0.0001717231,0.0006908773,0.00007774659,0.000104199484,0.000058440524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005257804,0.000070521026,0.0060463874,0.0000147800265,0.0000148839335,0.00007237668,0.06457285,0.000080458834,0.000025404293,0.92215645,0.00078945956,0.0061038616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013375364,0.0002802398,0.012680026,0.00009088303,0.00007597841,0.000010739879,0.0327,0.000290611,0.00009459754,0.012565029,0.93924904,0.00062530127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79973036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36368376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019628934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022324879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64792734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989094166","doi":"","title":"Acts and proceedings of the Synod of the Presbyterian Church of Canada, in connection with the Church of Scotland : Session XXX, begun at Montreal, 26th May, 1858.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Connection (principal bundle); Period (music)","score_opus":0.004190856448498945,"score_gpt":0.17384697977771593,"score_spread":0.16965612332921698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989094166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9184216,0.000013731204,0.0000045767947,0.018742094,0.00004591002,0.00031598465,0.000011302939,0.000008459791,0.062436324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902649,0.000085146414,0.0000183909,0.000018605355,0.00001492787,4.6333463e-7,0.0000013516176,0.000005920179,0.009590282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991048,0.00013824241,0.00010724503,0.00014402905,0.0003628276,0.00014284556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935246,0.00014076228,0.00025127284,0.00013160208,0.00007863849,0.000045297045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016000577,0.00008199561,0.0001642336,0.0000711544,0.00024843417,0.000017111064,0.00033384978,0.00007647313,0.000018017461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047979906,0.000048799342,0.000037743568,0.0004537805,0.00049694686,0.00041901908,0.00015066071,0.00008294264,3.6295965e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065340556,0.00013629903,0.77161485,0.0004974168,0.00006694712,0.0000017892737,0.032517873,0.00015190788,0.0025917431,0.0642792,0.126989,0.0004995656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006745716,0.00013006204,0.961149,0.0003656461,0.000055303055,2.9946722e-7,0.013484755,0.00003728117,0.016860483,0.00046133916,0.006669453,0.000111801215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7014221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35896403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34245807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006512594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038939939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6527332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989708782","doi":"","title":"Canadian Freedom of Religion Case","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Freedom of religion; Multiculturalism; Religious freedom; Commission; Scope (computer science); Establishment Clause","score_opus":0.024661187186083528,"score_gpt":0.28249012341172713,"score_spread":0.2578289362256436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989708782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21666019,0.0007397527,0.000053176773,0.0018917009,0.00087914703,0.00024303001,0.000020423047,0.00007077662,0.77944183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957194,0.00006944301,0.00045276576,0.00035927424,0.00035914854,0.000008821191,0.00000924785,0.00001100958,0.003010901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876606,0.00013526974,0.00021340225,0.00017884288,0.00037474456,0.000331664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985213,0.000043404147,0.000081893806,0.00024165108,0.00028125555,0.0008304814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007048771,0.00009125903,0.00014078648,0.00009861733,0.0003106768,0.000077969016,0.00021042189,0.00014000032,0.000092528564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045708253,0.000092488604,0.00006106504,0.00026067422,0.00023525722,0.00028022716,0.000021459111,0.000103891725,0.00025904557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010701408,0.000026090169,0.0038110118,0.0000077014065,0.000008080282,0.00027513335,0.0039042,0.00005494663,0.00003063244,0.8547428,0.13667785,0.00045085012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001912048,0.0002601992,0.0005647566,0.000087468616,0.00009064197,0.00017817403,0.016547222,0.00014645624,0.0005952794,0.20774332,0.7711635,0.00071090163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99230886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77905923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035634267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009548597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37715757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991606804","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada – Religious Institutions (2022 Reissue)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Charter; Arbitration; Freedom of religion; Religious discrimination; Liability; Legislation; Religious organization; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.018484925147500567,"score_gpt":0.2727881238039921,"score_spread":0.25430319865649154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991606804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06914789,0.0023709422,0.000068195804,0.004780021,0.0018438878,0.00042444226,0.00010296894,0.000113560556,0.92114806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888953,0.00020857147,0.00012910936,0.0009826756,0.00019871838,0.00007459588,0.000030136755,0.000012579242,0.009468309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978506,0.00026025256,0.0003074766,0.0002573981,0.0009488102,0.0003754728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990806,0.00007928658,0.00015138417,0.0003254189,0.00013554901,0.00022777368],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067011133,0.00011172678,0.0001892396,0.000065795146,0.0017798096,0.000046308218,0.00046388814,0.000054778182,0.0012314859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028561076,0.0001258542,0.00007748576,0.000505264,0.0002799949,0.0001626978,0.00012984256,0.0002407823,0.00002090344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012632384,0.00005048364,0.00051102706,0.000008552871,0.000012148114,0.00002248362,0.0013452038,0.0005780883,0.0001950287,0.7899977,0.20703237,0.00023427891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031984175,0.00005414731,0.00026187117,0.000009100475,0.0000219721,0.000004157928,0.0045172726,0.000013730896,0.00027366108,0.029330809,0.96500325,0.00019016878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97120744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9731481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006092555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027160386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995832096","doi":"","title":"The Potential Impact of Charter Section 28 on Quebec's Controversial Secularism Law and the Pursuit of Gender-Equality in Canadian Courts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Secularism; Section (typography); Supreme court; Scholarship; Intersectionality; Democracy; Common law","score_opus":0.011631398479884784,"score_gpt":0.282901649154736,"score_spread":0.2712702506748512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995832096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7804259,0.0014915114,0.000074122145,0.006363462,0.0015725964,0.00082064647,0.00007771329,0.00003398327,0.20914006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989168,0.00011329523,0.0000023610216,0.00029143124,0.0002923928,0.000009830719,0.0000059515987,0.0000066198913,0.00036133247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849904,0.000401336,0.00022247041,0.0001619881,0.00043762647,0.00027752834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993678,0.00018813179,0.00007239037,0.00015766664,0.000073179384,0.00014086245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019235589,0.00009129839,0.0001570712,0.00005192993,0.0003944221,0.00026113898,0.00019260653,0.00012182319,0.00005233456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011119914,0.000056176672,0.0001351173,0.00012504884,0.0006436561,0.00018367,0.000019132858,0.00018919173,0.0000062077493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010718066,0.00001525401,0.00041395286,0.000013774617,0.00004598078,0.0000049865807,0.004270704,0.00005651367,0.00026204815,0.99164337,0.0027130595,0.00045320415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010727264,0.0007754055,0.14540601,0.00036868226,0.0005104514,0.000018345525,0.02204919,0.004830539,0.001292309,0.67311716,0.1397855,0.0011191175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31852615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030777196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005026623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30336156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998890300","doi":"","title":"Banned for Believing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Duty; Charter; Context (archaeology); Convention; Supreme court; Appeal; Order (exchange); Common law","score_opus":0.00954994756906008,"score_gpt":0.23892069282894957,"score_spread":0.22937074525988949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998890300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013291087,0.0002871289,0.000153802,0.060158387,0.0027106376,0.0011030431,0.00010589691,0.00088540174,0.92130464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08807573,0.0013951078,0.0007952149,0.00009105241,0.00047584533,0.000004158236,0.001201239,0.00006106507,0.9079006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985519,0.0001067832,0.00013297297,0.00046910017,0.00035506318,0.00038415848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922055,0.00016011886,0.00014412617,0.00020002198,0.00009619524,0.00017900285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009325626,0.00023687365,0.00026211728,0.00042289105,0.00071343244,0.00027012543,0.00048810025,0.0004794269,0.00028294825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008463586,0.00028083462,0.0002883964,0.00051230914,0.00009412483,0.0010308177,0.000053412958,0.00024176601,0.00013908341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100913705,0.000026540984,0.00016205739,0.0002522178,0.000050254504,0.000026605525,0.011442389,0.0000034221018,0.0000027649787,0.2216422,0.76546335,0.00082730706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002708637,0.000066345594,0.0005261678,0.0002922997,0.00023627827,2.5260372e-8,0.04721452,0.000004828595,0.00023977685,0.019412639,0.9312766,0.00045961872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02803185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051614917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20222956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016328247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007243294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999359524","doi":"","title":"Complementary Perspectives on Religious Accommodation in Europe and in Quebec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.013873207054720718,"score_gpt":0.22819683976631674,"score_spread":0.21432363271159602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999359524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061531454,0.005901455,0.0014764797,0.00268682,0.00039634312,0.001346818,0.00020360827,0.0006198569,0.92583716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72305346,0.0584307,0.0026924312,0.00095781486,0.0007972257,0.000022735709,0.00065955415,0.00050355634,0.21288253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635077,0.0007137385,0.00038556705,0.0010076786,0.00053068204,0.0010115865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833417,0.00016505297,0.00040465078,0.00052684493,0.0001331056,0.00043615588],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051231944,0.0006329617,0.0006319741,0.002043641,0.0007135476,0.00019765111,0.0011523935,0.00086868985,0.0010103455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010796251,0.0008052654,0.00018209511,0.00158889,0.0008630848,0.00092702865,0.0004224922,0.0007597163,0.00015141671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016713294,0.0007920195,0.011750655,0.00019882164,0.00018179203,0.0017281909,0.18019079,0.0006532397,0.00008627924,0.31104037,0.48189446,0.009812087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009534822,0.00022154051,0.026531868,0.0014096157,0.00024285528,0.000063482155,0.2255445,0.0006351127,0.000035643538,0.0034744663,0.73055524,0.0017508736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37331328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45710772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71295464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021612246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014427078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000690508","doi":"","title":"Freedom of religion as a universal human right: UDHR, Islam, and the late 20th century rights revolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Human rights; Islam; Freedom of religion; Government (linguistics); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.008944956144085203,"score_gpt":0.2543341153732081,"score_spread":0.2453891592291229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000690508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5663921,0.00059100625,1.6648153e-7,0.000046444202,0.0012564224,0.00076139794,0.00012904326,0.000114732014,0.4307087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717285,0.004035146,0.00014396521,0.000065813925,0.00022336758,0.000040694355,0.0005230441,0.00007170278,0.023167746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531156,0.0010672798,0.00086920604,0.0007853635,0.0013168936,0.0006497134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968574,0.00026308175,0.0011166946,0.0006388595,0.0008634516,0.00026049578],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00196146,0.0005617437,0.00072610786,0.0004364822,0.004298457,0.00014420808,0.0008365073,0.0010268997,0.00018556423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000599604,0.0004530383,0.00038508882,0.00065002067,0.0011368449,0.00089012936,0.000112984715,0.0008068241,0.00013529668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003849838,0.000100786965,0.0000072759776,0.00011456218,0.00011484153,0.000013049349,0.0010904437,0.000002540868,0.001999534,0.9926632,0.0002942765,0.0032144806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033789247,0.0003139252,0.00047730407,0.00074036035,0.000716778,0.0000073904757,0.0043802112,0.000023538885,0.0045080055,0.8612342,0.123250365,0.0009690182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08308138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10207083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40754095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059546385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001335041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000725760","doi":"","title":"The Globalization of Human Rights Policies : a comparison between France, Canada and Turkey","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"United Nations","keywords":"Human rights; Obligation; Globalization; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.024742092272391485,"score_gpt":0.2996291993914868,"score_spread":0.2748871071190953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000725760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64966387,0.006991444,0.0007224918,0.049549613,0.0005715872,0.00031912883,0.00004469036,0.000029552888,0.2921076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953599,0.000101073965,0.000021265656,0.00021555989,0.00031558287,0.0000013462134,0.000007834987,0.000003145829,0.003974301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989483,0.00012368287,0.00027681098,0.000120826866,0.00034637062,0.00018406197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945223,0.0001137257,0.00014223868,0.00006808662,0.00009991473,0.00012379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012814105,0.00008465458,0.00017429824,0.000009639913,0.0007930834,0.00005953758,0.00015947179,0.0000659951,0.000030326953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036895333,0.00006096085,0.00002600074,0.00030314128,0.00042825245,0.00008897648,0.000031123232,0.000051932027,0.0000022793008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022710242,0.000011173731,0.08016087,0.00003552329,0.000022519916,3.028504e-7,0.010012557,0.00003604413,0.000021288311,0.7904191,0.11670185,0.0025764888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006052518,0.00023494249,0.11931847,0.0000693864,0.00017089967,2.7885662e-7,0.009299511,0.0019711698,0.0011316291,0.079265095,0.7875817,0.00035169386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71115404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068758556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001474584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6099836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001121837","doi":"","title":"On the influence of American ideas in the Anglican Church in the Diocese of Montreal : (with other matter) / by Rev. I. Constantine, M.A.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Triacetin; Emperipolesis; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.004114319469220431,"score_gpt":0.19821520172787835,"score_spread":0.19410088225865793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001121837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7939365,0.0000047682424,0.000016871709,0.06883556,0.0000051070674,0.00022674435,0.000011441644,0.00001049142,0.13695252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970875,0.00006533517,0.00003104652,0.0011022863,0.00000919591,0.0000012906095,0.0000021920378,0.000005691152,0.0016955014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846417,0.0007511868,0.00010362645,0.00014952318,0.00034933214,0.00018213503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988379,0.0006430736,0.00017746659,0.00028194633,0.00002955728,0.000030063748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032235935,0.000093028204,0.00015163522,0.00010361535,0.00012821522,0.000030891668,0.0007166644,0.000047455716,0.00004110057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006750476,0.000050625214,0.000039795774,0.0009053233,0.0009927398,0.00029093857,0.000037894395,0.00016904563,0.000003307185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002454091,0.00022983288,0.5055874,0.00002011141,0.000016629008,0.0000130974295,0.04362455,0.00021366475,0.000033498425,0.27663812,0.17310175,0.00027594928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007517902,0.0003480878,0.88203,0.00012752133,0.000030884006,2.4142565e-7,0.08988792,0.000010971996,0.00012103549,0.0070706843,0.019395882,0.00022496028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22870292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063168267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37644264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019556592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007746416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7764332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009776318","doi":"","title":"Family Law, Pluralism, and Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; State (computer science); Human rights; Family law; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism","score_opus":0.03218260263118863,"score_gpt":0.28337113729269364,"score_spread":0.25118853466150504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009776318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34651226,0.00019647069,0.000011911804,0.0001144406,0.00022269331,0.0001296368,0.0000029289179,0.00009865543,0.652711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946149,0.000026913114,0.0003302823,0.00067780603,0.00028957374,0.000014049793,0.0000060931766,0.000010069075,0.00403029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887615,0.00011551959,0.00017340816,0.00024352582,0.00029496383,0.00029645578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999396,0.000028131495,0.0000627322,0.00019429304,0.00007809621,0.00024069827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031901198,0.00011394946,0.00013553278,0.00003498117,0.0012238657,0.00013213912,0.0002203843,0.00012430809,0.0003014939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018940156,0.0001016868,0.0000514115,0.000100723846,0.00056635035,0.00042044604,0.00004099983,0.000111687754,0.00023039084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050589756,0.000029878098,0.0011861203,0.0000037932368,0.000005235314,0.000007113872,0.0033297476,8.9247e-8,0.00023713306,0.98996204,0.005138661,0.000095115065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006469521,0.00009656751,0.016162299,0.0000338035,0.000038137157,0.0000017475446,0.0013889046,0.0000017163434,0.00097250676,0.65895194,0.32133904,0.00036640046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39985302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20750286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6486807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043727217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002525521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94131094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011023023","doi":"","title":"La compénétration des ordres normatifs : étude des rapports entre les ordres normatifs religieux et étatiques en France et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Field (mathematics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.0050730291556978875,"score_gpt":0.20074947289441772,"score_spread":0.19567644373871984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011023023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044632717,0.0017854968,0.00038665373,0.0017224789,0.00016048527,0.00035102572,0.0002927379,0.00007015236,0.9907677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82069355,0.011548566,0.0045779175,0.001498675,0.0002887912,0.000036237736,0.00013116589,0.00014068729,0.1610844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620813,0.00075201853,0.00043699707,0.00030537287,0.0018713804,0.0004260848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846977,0.000597041,0.00044234685,0.00020109558,0.0000034099612,0.00028632814],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012431045,0.00035056705,0.00038902892,0.00008363107,0.00040653071,0.00012745189,0.00037687426,0.00014875572,0.0003392822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033221902,0.00033641065,0.000059217466,0.00010829001,0.0005677586,0.00072135386,0.00009613089,0.00023886889,4.0039804e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015389475,0.00013483912,0.032432523,0.0011390394,0.00026267735,0.000090941816,0.031509757,0.00017947388,0.0004220593,0.5836732,0.28711793,0.06288369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049448374,0.00007475887,0.04994663,0.0010741153,0.00007733147,0.0000069640914,0.029117439,0.00015360302,0.001507865,0.008466862,0.9083251,0.0007548646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3502061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89741826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052561543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037165163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017251852","doi":"","title":"Angelo Rinella, La Shari’a in Occidente. Giurisdizioni e diritto islamico: Regno Unito, Canada e Stati Uniti d’America il Mulino, Bologna","year":2020,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Headline; European union","score_opus":0.0702898508422462,"score_gpt":0.31433445213233985,"score_spread":0.24404460129009364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017251852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14186136,0.0007075221,0.0029946615,0.015223458,0.0016354539,0.0025176655,0.0021065276,0.00025864097,0.8326947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627554,0.0009618407,0.00006355202,0.0003407352,0.00030114225,0.00004531077,0.0005989767,0.000017471826,0.0013954445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914007,0.0015870646,0.0010894128,0.000581305,0.0041092136,0.0012323121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954506,0.0008082374,0.00052692695,0.00036427574,0.0020779043,0.0007720531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018055158,0.00045053966,0.00062098337,0.0011761871,0.0025800948,0.00060470495,0.0012548489,0.00034141212,0.0002485014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012410126,0.00050167664,0.00017468228,0.004469492,0.0014195859,0.0035162233,0.00063861645,0.0010054602,0.00064012513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007631807,0.00033862313,0.016658789,0.0013553373,0.0003977101,0.0009365034,0.1132707,0.010065973,0.000018037985,0.67129725,0.17459981,0.010298061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004578825,0.0002897545,0.027424244,0.0009240229,0.00010190144,0.000025426216,0.4769596,0.016562384,0.000013631359,0.00026733213,0.47195503,0.0008978474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7172649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3503037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85441417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050588166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077106925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018038258","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Secularization: Religious Pluralism and the Canadian Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Religious freedom; Constitution; Establishment Clause; Legislation","score_opus":0.00799136243682879,"score_gpt":0.19035306305228802,"score_spread":0.18236170061545923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018038258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026093146,0.0063032927,0.000018643183,0.002926307,0.00044544024,0.00066719844,0.000012588383,0.00016413312,0.98685306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873507,0.0056753317,0.00016087461,0.0026236463,0.000617845,0.00006650762,0.00008081218,0.000015316738,0.00340894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979808,0.00031710265,0.00023704945,0.0003005044,0.0003237012,0.00084086217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928313,0.000100605306,0.000088344495,0.00017238676,0.00006830526,0.00028721135],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004896164,0.00009835158,0.00017342383,0.00002223606,0.00227613,0.0011532147,0.0003271582,0.00016702649,0.011975882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061583945,0.00013706778,0.000074101896,0.00034179504,0.0023187858,0.0006580019,0.0000550124,0.00025544252,0.000015381293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011910967,0.000012377924,0.0048227166,0.0000019956021,0.00002447226,0.00002839284,0.0011350435,0.000007888722,1.3757279e-8,0.8528278,0.13909082,0.0020365997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000746956,0.00003166365,0.0007384039,0.0000293749,0.00003068652,0.00005793323,0.00012339232,0.00010120265,4.2360674e-7,0.8601784,0.13778403,0.00017748943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86279577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013910956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020999745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026640410","doi":"","title":"Aménager la diversité: le droit de l'égalité face à la pluralité religieuse","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.011170538953812655,"score_gpt":0.22416540154389333,"score_spread":0.21299486259008069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026640410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31717262,0.0039058526,0.006389543,0.054992404,0.0004119685,0.0013790675,0.0005457207,0.0006517668,0.61455107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8756054,0.005143796,0.0006142249,0.003390226,0.00028249677,0.000005636887,0.0001941406,0.00011788997,0.11464616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247503,0.0016935259,0.0006468935,0.0016352149,0.0011732802,0.0023760335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942392,0.0015966931,0.00072166335,0.0011517798,0.0004701867,0.0018204422],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015528313,0.0012606313,0.00127979,0.0012181078,0.00414363,0.0029789524,0.004134891,0.001410888,0.00027703264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042232088,0.0014404469,0.00095356203,0.003134625,0.003600041,0.0036271468,0.0029167766,0.0012831306,0.0001438755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002314095,0.00038996479,0.0025857906,0.00013095772,0.00038560966,0.0024154743,0.19325897,0.0006669168,0.00010602338,0.76792455,0.016344814,0.01347684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007823324,0.00049788406,0.017010977,0.0004766321,0.0010764031,0.0005133898,0.03819022,0.0010771854,0.0004108845,0.079646625,0.8509597,0.00231674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022071367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013010486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83461493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015491924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036078406","doi":"","title":"Another Breeding Record of the Ring-necked Duck for the Province of Quebec, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.019251755732767408,"score_gpt":0.20260529204737293,"score_spread":0.18335353631460552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036078406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523363,0.00020664271,0.0047911135,0.0017738859,0.0011109923,0.0008211986,0.0011073867,0.00006594259,0.037786547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941963,0.000023210716,0.00010805366,0.000009417728,0.00007545343,1.1073266e-7,0.000010308395,0.000013315114,0.005563849],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985087,0.000060698865,0.00020759099,0.0002814738,0.00065229303,0.00028923273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984076,0.0003854017,0.0003748195,0.00038117525,0.0003628141,0.00008820552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003013651,0.00016867217,0.0003504156,0.00015732979,0.00070649374,0.000041645693,0.00113493,0.00012469418,0.00004244915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011358307,0.00016114925,0.00035757705,0.00061631436,0.0013519865,0.0005376067,0.00027732583,0.00017411589,0.000002609834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025515985,0.0003598568,0.13689649,0.0025315906,0.002245632,0.00009253584,0.5387645,0.0016527483,0.00076767843,0.2214352,0.06923597,0.023466235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027580585,0.00033133687,0.0342751,0.0009944161,0.0011051745,0.0000016639622,0.8884142,0.002286266,0.00059415307,0.0026754166,0.06566277,0.00090145774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5647676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81902295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34964973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023348938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013398676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6571476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037177836","doi":"","title":"Disruptive Choices: Agency, Religious Freedom, and Veiling Muslim Women in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Critical race theory; Public law; Scholarship; Human rights; Normative; State (computer science); Indigenous; Constitutional law; Law reform","score_opus":0.027356139692044087,"score_gpt":0.3023603522655171,"score_spread":0.275004212573473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037177836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025441714,0.0036005448,0.0000015556082,0.00081602146,0.00055152224,0.0005382204,0.06076691,0.00018904828,0.90809447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995463,0.00008727833,0.000010880815,0.00018796137,0.00024951558,0.000117281044,0.0036435237,0.000006572118,0.00023396996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989368,0.00004941296,0.00012475382,0.00023109403,0.0001966307,0.00046133314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.000151315,0.00001992067,0.000069865244,0.00005541667,0.00031786427],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021005081,0.000087797365,0.00009302795,0.00014260804,0.00029864462,0.0002282461,0.00012160173,0.00010803638,0.006340224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062802486,0.00008920186,0.000028668886,0.00026832023,0.0001603131,0.00025511952,0.000025806117,0.000119702505,0.00091033155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008119394,0.000036099624,0.0010339885,0.00032478682,0.00003586451,0.00055099843,0.26985636,0.00013631642,0.000016267246,0.47677916,0.24655011,0.0046719266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034085393,0.000044704284,0.0029549017,0.0017962441,0.000009934111,0.000010206943,0.019031059,0.0010590018,0.000009169876,0.031146685,0.94315577,0.00044146692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43143916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8212956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000573906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011141883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038158744","doi":"","title":"Hedge funds had their best first quarter in 13 years to start 2019","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Hedge fund; Hedge; Investment (military); Revenue","score_opus":0.01986238538269223,"score_gpt":0.2813780835891479,"score_spread":0.26151569820645565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038158744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041150762,0.00033454335,0.00006235324,0.0015420597,0.0010038015,0.0005882915,0.000029261571,0.00009322119,0.99593496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02775418,0.00037262338,0.000078843994,0.00040442654,0.00046105715,0.000021274118,0.000021627564,0.00009874474,0.9707872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988565,0.000060274564,0.0001580159,0.00030337507,0.0002976996,0.0003241395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947375,0.000045999874,0.00006419114,0.00028408345,0.000025214267,0.00010676053],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024160957,0.00016170146,0.00023455119,0.0002941252,0.000052687898,0.00009005007,0.00032082794,0.00031873165,0.002817333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024575564,0.0001403203,0.00007397954,0.00022303472,0.00007890561,0.00006245562,0.000038176237,0.00010271416,0.008074122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034815637,0.000041934058,0.0008426271,0.000012087131,0.0000065560266,0.0000017335113,0.006757207,0.0000017804794,0.0000013952263,0.0073305774,0.9833658,0.001634866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019843076,0.000057056044,0.0008207278,0.00008932699,0.0000059519366,9.3033464e-8,0.004835528,0.0000027681535,0.000001108411,0.0006238071,0.99313855,0.00022664036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1681317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5184634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35033172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010169056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012555004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043635859","doi":"","title":"Two letters to the Lord Bishop of Ontario on the question is lay baptism valid?.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Baptism; Covenant; Warrant; Absolute (philosophy); Worship; Conscience","score_opus":0.011659554769807255,"score_gpt":0.22634003146154172,"score_spread":0.21468047669173446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043635859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3107528,0.0000024605781,0.00079388893,0.48587826,0.00024471234,0.0002955707,0.0000058299265,0.00007919975,0.20194727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91976523,0.000035368917,0.00033877091,0.0038207436,0.00012640307,8.205232e-7,0.0000051117363,0.00000940486,0.07589814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870044,0.0004142858,0.000083971936,0.00020941047,0.0003725206,0.00021936352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923444,0.00022014536,0.00009477489,0.0003085937,0.00003904104,0.0001030283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002564113,0.000109810455,0.00011585861,0.00011168885,0.0005303517,0.000085441294,0.0005470025,0.00006386626,0.00026808147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006155545,0.0000794557,0.00009584953,0.00036717966,0.00021295845,0.0005138282,0.00010280002,0.00014698661,0.00009656366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003970542,0.00002908059,0.00760417,0.0000035844728,0.000013901285,0.000002701884,0.018715648,0.0001409604,0.000013843472,0.4065346,0.5665241,0.00037771667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032858455,0.00012644567,0.017422453,0.000059494698,0.00004651362,5.5309414e-8,0.004705514,0.0000073011697,0.0010311313,0.0046954034,0.97136223,0.00021485145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5113423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07685468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6090124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016868618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019421177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045197577","doi":"","title":"Aménager la diversité: le droit de l'égalité face à la pluralité religieuse","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Subject (documents); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02262111713405934,"score_gpt":0.2903407476771286,"score_spread":0.26771963054306924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045197577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07211272,0.0031358222,0.0016316797,0.045070592,0.0005712348,0.00039579842,0.00017231495,0.0003456724,0.87656415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95764166,0.0005370714,0.00029879253,0.0025213205,0.00041235416,0.000012337347,0.00006742142,0.000032107262,0.038476914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997338,0.00023787345,0.00040385633,0.0005677048,0.0006202121,0.00083236524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983751,0.000459768,0.00016942795,0.00036721464,0.00010217245,0.0005262718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027514508,0.0003650513,0.00037384007,0.00018436226,0.00061069947,0.008101728,0.0014180157,0.00037860608,0.00011137673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051916897,0.0003995303,0.00023144358,0.0009838403,0.0009935775,0.012693789,0.00046223053,0.00024781257,0.00032885477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068794754,0.000259969,0.004110173,0.000039282095,0.000033583932,0.00007601263,0.014514499,0.000115482166,0.000009684094,0.77296543,0.16531943,0.042487673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005050372,0.00013861113,0.020200264,0.0001532376,0.000053954158,0.00000914118,0.0056256345,0.0000398903,0.0005098911,0.4073929,0.56469816,0.0006732521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005019481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016491681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.885529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013981557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005466363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045337308","doi":"","title":"Address of the Synod of the Presbyterian church of Canada in connection with the Church of Scotland, to the members of that Church, on parental responsibility.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Liquation; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.008127446820433992,"score_gpt":0.20146553536413214,"score_spread":0.19333808854369816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045337308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9247713,0.000009831725,0.0000127532085,0.027113186,0.00013759318,0.0006058698,0.00005448602,0.000007800717,0.047287166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529845,0.000024517976,0.000014146232,0.000053327498,0.00001788942,0.0000011843923,0.000002615081,0.0000073273163,0.004580571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779004,0.0010058249,0.00017048753,0.00018584968,0.0006670191,0.00018078399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984688,0.00059275853,0.00030821827,0.00049547286,0.00008585727,0.000048897073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004527366,0.00010884705,0.00022425197,0.00010195645,0.00021557452,0.000012319939,0.00083529257,0.000076910495,0.000066037945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001538901,0.000057641137,0.00009441491,0.0007690231,0.0007257486,0.00024063062,0.00016378125,0.0001357085,1.11233305e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00436153,0.00045571473,0.600471,0.00048012598,0.00021941474,0.0000040744335,0.08174596,0.006171783,0.0018533058,0.13023838,0.17345682,0.000541849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009007398,0.00038346762,0.886456,0.0004910466,0.000082790466,2.1814014e-7,0.051916286,0.000044088716,0.046066083,0.0004276593,0.013047717,0.00018391141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72733825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47735536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28598496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000923682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007679946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53218156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070479946","doi":"","title":"\"The participation of God himself\" : law and mediation in the thought of Richard Hooker","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Bibliographical Society of Canada","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Doctrine; Incarnation; Mediation; Creatures; Faith; Natural law; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02144122165392816,"score_gpt":0.2860844730925885,"score_spread":0.26464325143866035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070479946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6636935,0.0010536483,1.4540367e-7,0.0001583552,0.0005788656,0.00068583706,0.000085718435,0.000028803852,0.3337151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953259,0.0026155557,0.000045666635,0.00009895257,0.000057695568,0.00012272564,0.00013412989,0.0000282022,0.0015711631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647546,0.0009719517,0.0007795357,0.00035059353,0.0010595421,0.00036290006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975986,0.000800302,0.0007757012,0.0003407202,0.00039916646,0.00008553836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002590163,0.00024513275,0.00035536298,0.00016041781,0.0010893282,0.00006827701,0.00047167178,0.00044001295,0.00003576987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014185477,0.0001811138,0.00013436166,0.00057320506,0.00027641706,0.0004439613,0.000027429718,0.00042713646,0.000014248136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062980835,0.00013206042,0.00015747875,0.000107341875,0.000032269265,0.0000021283472,0.0013327005,0.000008634136,0.0015633459,0.9552402,0.000033364537,0.041327506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003513412,0.00066471915,0.052712474,0.0008055622,0.00090942765,0.0000048724887,0.044559214,0.00017461227,0.04281252,0.7009721,0.15098217,0.0018889636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055353413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08017347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33214396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001714169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004137206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93661094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096743781","doi":"","title":"Reflections on Towards an Anglican Covenant (JSC March 2006) and","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Worship; Face (sociological concept); Context (archaeology); Windsor; Ecclesiology; Bishops; Body of Christ","score_opus":0.06297373301296447,"score_gpt":0.42418515797958845,"score_spread":0.36121142496662395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096743781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07227582,0.000028081033,0.001281714,0.002017111,0.00015669472,0.00011561923,0.0000025012957,0.00007535553,0.9240471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184245,0.00010519974,0.00048404816,0.00047941424,0.0002098364,0.0000032910968,0.0000034677923,0.000004402971,0.006867886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999289,0.000047883503,0.00008824211,0.0001413237,0.00022584682,0.00020774496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996483,0.000042041145,0.000020594127,0.00008925992,0.0000586184,0.00014121848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006959788,0.000048676826,0.00005412595,0.00008507276,0.00039745437,0.000059368853,0.00006979423,0.00005806506,0.00010802724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076014185,0.00003968475,0.000018501698,0.00019505294,0.00014864586,0.000108954795,0.00001064742,0.00004936501,0.00001944188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027002565,0.000100839905,0.00082836713,0.0000023691534,0.0000035683563,0.0000043209034,0.007059089,0.0000019341767,0.0005663829,0.91910315,0.009066368,0.0632366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012997834,0.0015455747,0.17126799,0.00003259625,0.000048516813,0.000010700301,0.07046798,0.00010689874,0.004210747,0.22225143,0.52796704,0.0007907592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033295754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08348418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91956663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006108619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000668797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104177754","doi":"10.7202/1121375ar","title":"Astrid Von Busekist, La religion au tribunal. Essai sur le délibéralisme*","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.009415729247770873,"score_gpt":0.22585057460998442,"score_spread":0.21643484536221355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104177754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13873924,0.0069288923,0.006107433,0.016911209,0.0012633777,0.00038533058,0.000041152016,0.00017813551,0.82944524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5490838,0.007521289,0.00042124864,0.0003830838,0.0004435853,0.0000057005245,0.00004550035,0.000030705956,0.44206503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997424,0.00050912274,0.00035511237,0.0005370483,0.0003173854,0.000857328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985474,0.00032910696,0.00019897563,0.0003970627,0.00020695334,0.00032054086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010035506,0.00028636065,0.00039659173,0.0002882748,0.0008942687,0.00012979958,0.00062410755,0.0006326957,0.00009900226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020447328,0.00040927072,0.00034649446,0.001034928,0.0005332579,0.00042003195,0.0001819996,0.00037575362,0.00011803662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013246812,0.00024743887,0.0038728998,0.00036797626,0.0000857597,0.00022178232,0.0045450954,0.00079173374,0.00056412653,0.90364385,0.07520082,0.010326066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023210556,0.00009690436,0.0050917407,0.00094266643,0.0003882253,0.000047766363,0.001839792,0.0017513643,0.0014725772,0.10811988,0.87741584,0.0005122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059743557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024465926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80221504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063995738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015796539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104460804","doi":"10.1093/9780198922469.003.0006","title":"Dignity’s Epilogue?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Interpretation (philosophy); Autonomy; Individualism; Secularization; Dualism","score_opus":0.03045871171617695,"score_gpt":0.30379041530062334,"score_spread":0.27333170358444636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104460804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.6239993e-7,0.00029641562,0.00027581403,0.0013163108,0.0006228612,0.00019133251,0.000009258082,0.00013398076,0.99715364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027907065,0.0012396233,0.000106398045,0.0004374959,0.00033809684,0.00000407689,0.000033200944,0.0000088383,0.99504155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991879,0.0000177375,0.00014582962,0.00019243335,0.0003056652,0.00015044547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950165,0.00009405403,0.00006304155,0.00015713343,0.00011684703,0.0000672782],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020310104,0.00011979691,0.00015573506,0.00011535515,0.0002600216,0.00006374053,0.00020639198,0.0003184053,0.0021559766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089659676,0.00011226793,0.00011073786,0.000023477292,0.00020591774,0.00005378102,0.000040385617,0.00012502087,0.000663256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010106761,0.0000028482734,0.0000032247272,0.0000060809657,0.0000074165205,0.000001836106,0.00026363053,4.7237545e-8,1.9071624e-7,0.7372566,0.25068292,0.011774218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034025048,0.0000054173674,0.0000036322522,0.000023749979,0.00002036728,5.1638043e-8,0.0000796281,4.4386084e-7,0.0000012221617,0.4439628,0.5557846,0.00008402716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004847419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011198559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30510166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009527073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029665406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104832580","doi":"10.4000/154xu","title":"Stéphane Bernatchez, Pierre C. Noël, Raphaël Mathieu Legault-Laberge (dir.), Droit des religions Canada-Québec","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du droit des religions","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Order (exchange); Relation (database); Christianity","score_opus":0.011861897795009069,"score_gpt":0.2541912716711324,"score_spread":0.24232937387612336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104832580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17089437,0.3121611,0.0032955396,0.043992493,0.008217324,0.0017529294,0.00052211183,0.0005959204,0.45856822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62986356,0.11716259,0.0009109293,0.0012525575,0.0011080618,0.00018329581,0.00013723006,0.00011859576,0.24926318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363714,0.00047781394,0.0015008519,0.0013378088,0.0010468808,0.0019995214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953908,0.00086864154,0.00053732115,0.001227923,0.0009906782,0.0009846751],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009558364,0.00087084074,0.0010830255,0.000566693,0.0033396157,0.0004152855,0.0015029705,0.0008453285,0.00037147236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015207123,0.001071116,0.000706513,0.0034079514,0.0028364775,0.0007858633,0.00030613094,0.00091318175,0.000401861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005313571,0.00063901005,0.0038035493,0.00060429715,0.00035114837,0.00034199058,0.004025658,0.0003637665,0.00022380424,0.33080825,0.63472456,0.024060836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015328005,0.00022609244,0.003148021,0.0023336578,0.0011401701,0.00019028237,0.0036672107,0.0009131376,0.00041377544,0.24324167,0.7416859,0.001507292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98291266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99223423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45896918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00448044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005799959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111695239","doi":"","title":"Questions About the Reasonable Accommodation of Minorities","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Reasonable accommodation; Accommodation; Constructive; Politics; Democracy; Property (philosophy); Legal culture","score_opus":0.017280938482975343,"score_gpt":0.28455619796656856,"score_spread":0.2672752594835932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111695239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32918316,0.002466523,0.00012560854,0.005272645,0.0041668857,0.0007503976,0.000070134774,0.0000936046,0.65787107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988789,0.001109624,0.0005120169,0.00028060318,0.0013420922,0.00006138946,0.000025797044,0.000021546562,0.007857933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973033,0.00038801334,0.0006101347,0.00037196075,0.00081747724,0.00050907925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764943,0.00039077777,0.0004160457,0.00072446105,0.0005727174,0.00024659274],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015530976,0.00024386833,0.0003036478,0.00007702509,0.001751392,0.00043709273,0.00084690994,0.0003624442,0.0014700798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009212197,0.00020104162,0.00020885206,0.0005276407,0.0018171229,0.00093143893,0.00011704834,0.00063062675,0.00031761674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017840444,0.00014325637,0.0027376486,0.000042413452,0.000024604144,9.273332e-7,0.0038636466,0.000020069752,0.0019650206,0.9786527,0.009531199,0.0030006717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015356989,0.00023327945,0.052150376,0.00041360458,0.0005134304,0.000012623948,0.030202154,0.00052812515,0.0053420835,0.512787,0.39515156,0.0011300951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13313952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14426564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65960586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075313415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004667311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114428145","doi":"","title":"Dignity in Judgment. Constitutional Adjudication in Comparative Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Padua  Archive (University of Padua)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Adjudication; Autonomy; Connotation; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional law; Discretion","score_opus":0.12429530977278976,"score_gpt":0.4018050361164045,"score_spread":0.27750972634361476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114428145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031737436,0.0003198276,0.004230283,0.0020075152,0.00007517921,0.0011203317,0.00024347207,0.000022495395,0.9916635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45889944,0.006164868,0.0024384023,0.000046778216,0.00021815415,0.00001598267,0.0007991512,0.000016677426,0.53140056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959906,0.0014528859,0.0002206999,0.0005427293,0.0012988705,0.0004942627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725056,0.0013966572,0.00017512777,0.00024087731,0.00078210374,0.00015465247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019298631,0.00017186231,0.0004515838,0.0018121424,0.0006398521,0.000030977146,0.000661736,0.00025743467,0.00018254144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050384324,0.00023095457,0.00014140905,0.0007576041,0.00605349,0.00026795713,0.00029494907,0.0010272508,0.000075780416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014759097,0.00021895819,0.0007103917,0.00007197156,0.000040790037,0.000045965,0.038084313,0.000034721794,0.0000749478,0.89370525,0.06632427,0.00054084166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001518978,0.00013666657,0.011348382,0.0010426663,0.000030414225,4.885366e-7,0.09296046,0.00050836377,0.000007968576,0.8492849,0.042830415,0.00033031765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042604312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1520634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46026298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024666311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005814707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116349764","doi":"10.5287/ora-5rknrqgm0","title":"A systems theoretical and reflexive law framework for the regulation of religious family life","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Reflexivity; Normative; Psychological intervention; Family law; State (computer science); Family life; Religious law; Conceptual framework","score_opus":0.031096373159497964,"score_gpt":0.31769050227787543,"score_spread":0.28659412911837745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116349764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1249388,0.0028165001,0.028149934,0.003581207,0.001098565,0.0063926317,0.001614633,0.00016492298,0.8312428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733718,0.016830498,0.0023920226,0.000023098552,0.00011815946,0.0000030527885,0.00061141147,0.000033661916,0.0066162692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960677,0.001120058,0.00023975322,0.0005486914,0.0014527296,0.0005710472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948598,0.0030075198,0.00045736725,0.00048194782,0.000908622,0.0002847289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002064731,0.00022638387,0.0005024523,0.00063643744,0.0032548856,0.000067214256,0.0013396159,0.00038595725,0.000117282194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006147802,0.0002503842,0.0002992127,0.0008066408,0.003441196,0.00029304443,0.00036782867,0.00082126306,0.00000122404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023170125,0.00008134919,0.000105424864,0.0003110111,0.00016379202,0.000009391284,0.030979317,0.00007344799,0.00010260702,0.9589052,0.005472097,0.0014793235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009553984,0.00061076216,0.002267291,0.0002672253,0.00027892392,9.4173384e-7,0.47139585,0.0012017016,0.000008092897,0.31860834,0.20409705,0.00030840805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023331316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011611529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.848433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031027332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009937085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117994686","doi":"10.1017/s0957876509023833","title":"Kerry O’Halloran, Myles McGregor-Lowndes, Karla W. Simon, Charity Law &amp; Social Policy: National and International Perspectives on the Functions of the Law Relating to Charities, Springer (Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, Volume 10), New York, 2008, 514 pp., index, $139.00","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Public law; Social policy; Public authority","score_opus":0.035463712564559546,"score_gpt":0.2947376791333898,"score_spread":0.2592739665688302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117994686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4297104,0.0021665609,0.0024242941,0.50930023,0.0011438861,0.0008004,0.0006466514,0.00008383648,0.05372372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99191856,0.00053617696,0.00039273233,0.0017341151,0.0022089626,0.000004761888,0.00006771854,0.000021403626,0.0031155567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735576,0.00025456888,0.0007338903,0.0002874189,0.001108298,0.0002600578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701524,0.00025693758,0.00065993663,0.00014664127,0.0016940869,0.00022714227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007201556,0.00021874906,0.00025813282,0.0004145883,0.0010610806,0.0004130617,0.0006675865,0.00016776205,0.0005173523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017957935,0.00017781228,0.000106748914,0.0010194032,0.00084409985,0.0014052741,0.00016692493,0.00034045073,0.0000051073525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007913306,0.00023611476,0.04717391,0.000007707185,0.00017966793,9.950044e-7,0.008243719,0.000019761537,0.00017534202,0.9202877,0.022676796,0.000919125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003088695,0.0007693361,0.5429938,0.00037767595,0.00022179502,0.00017140798,0.039698057,0.0005846354,0.00035967192,0.18643098,0.22429089,0.0010130934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005853842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005280494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73385674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002522135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016151278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8849297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126092596","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781399507431.003.0018","title":"Anglicans","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charisma; Liberalism; Christianity; Synod; Protestantism","score_opus":0.04771596393429815,"score_gpt":0.2541883087856775,"score_spread":0.20647234485137933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126092596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006769758,0.000036833553,0.000040433923,0.00013225275,0.0010675011,0.00028141987,0.000054002543,0.00041710664,0.99796367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009318965,0.00055130874,0.00002250464,0.000033234628,0.0008437391,6.169624e-7,0.000023203107,0.00002784695,0.9975656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987037,0.00002939973,0.000115362505,0.00033614802,0.00053035945,0.0002849861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914694,0.00010974193,0.00013586617,0.00025762487,0.00016490858,0.00018494486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022151435,0.00018853832,0.0002174288,0.00019777939,0.00053348683,0.000059247322,0.00048049245,0.00045180458,0.0001560492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032522512,0.00023196213,0.0001790729,0.000014629838,0.00048818,0.000082023515,0.00015409681,0.00025518914,0.000034860943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107079195,0.0000027171109,0.0000010735799,0.0000048160477,0.00002968571,0.0000745686,0.0023277164,0.0000010532381,0.0000011235325,0.7720934,0.22278048,0.0026726648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018732314,0.00001502424,0.0000027103467,0.00005705789,0.00010131152,3.449078e-7,0.000665665,0.0000032048235,0.0000045326387,0.028094918,0.9706173,0.00025063436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008047568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013413153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74783677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021280348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021893518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128612901","doi":"10.26180/10065695.v1","title":"The Reconciliation of Freedom of Religion with Anti-Discrimination Rights","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; International law","score_opus":0.008638607703180493,"score_gpt":0.21047778243926804,"score_spread":0.20183917473608753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128612901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83928674,0.00022247883,0.00029313014,0.00048325758,0.00051307905,0.0005254851,0.00001999704,0.000017562823,0.15863824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925073,0.001546161,0.00012293847,0.000004846786,0.00004329625,2.649676e-7,0.000013257206,0.000006634369,0.0057553374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809325,0.00031327715,0.00030945483,0.0003029809,0.0007340389,0.0002469994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997782,0.00028210814,0.00073396217,0.00035723345,0.00077242224,0.000072272276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006646388,0.0001554338,0.00028100546,0.00015368727,0.0006287515,0.00003096627,0.00044974897,0.00018713759,0.000044152497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005276375,0.0001223161,0.00013511899,0.00065528764,0.0007711846,0.0005538657,0.00006854825,0.00012135584,0.000025098974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089449884,0.00039322578,0.043705173,0.00023688706,0.00016477393,0.0000064580117,0.029032217,0.0019405434,0.0029580186,0.91008675,0.0064137285,0.0041677514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01795432,0.0063012447,0.5085122,0.0023382346,0.0026297478,0.0000087593635,0.18590118,0.024596266,0.030852703,0.091539346,0.12638555,0.0029804644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033910166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015558495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81854737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023694386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025931982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128641882","doi":"10.26180/10065695","title":"The Reconciliation of Freedom of Religion with Anti-Discrimination Rights","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Context (archaeology); International human rights law; Freedom of religion; Fundamental rights; International law","score_opus":0.008638607703180493,"score_gpt":0.21047778243926804,"score_spread":0.20183917473608753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128641882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83928674,0.00022247883,0.00029313014,0.00048325758,0.00051307905,0.0005254851,0.00001999704,0.000017562823,0.15863824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925073,0.001546161,0.00012293847,0.000004846786,0.00004329625,2.649676e-7,0.000013257206,0.000006634369,0.0057553374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809325,0.00031327715,0.00030945483,0.0003029809,0.0007340389,0.0002469994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997782,0.00028210814,0.00073396217,0.00035723345,0.00077242224,0.000072272276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006646388,0.0001554338,0.00028100546,0.00015368727,0.0006287515,0.00003096627,0.00044974897,0.00018713759,0.000044152497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005276375,0.0001223161,0.00013511899,0.00065528764,0.0007711846,0.0005538657,0.00006854825,0.00012135584,0.000025098974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089449884,0.00039322578,0.043705173,0.00023688706,0.00016477393,0.0000064580117,0.029032217,0.0019405434,0.0029580186,0.91008675,0.0064137285,0.0041677514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01795432,0.0063012447,0.5085122,0.0023382346,0.0026297478,0.0000087593635,0.18590118,0.024596266,0.030852703,0.091539346,0.12638555,0.0029804644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033910166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015558495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81854737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023694386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025931982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132893257","doi":"","title":"Freedom of religion vs. substantive equality: Value-based resolution of conflicts in the context of the Ontario sharia law debate","year":2008,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of religion; Charter; Dignity; Human rights; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Resolution (logic); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.04414177067204003,"score_gpt":0.33860509684188894,"score_spread":0.29446332616984894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132893257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8908773,0.0013563538,0.00009405466,0.0008834863,0.0009344778,0.0019707705,0.000038683844,0.000013565981,0.10383127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966392,0.0010002363,0.00006086933,0.00023105957,0.00006170125,0.000039944705,0.00017721615,0.000028157643,0.0017616099],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993441,0.0018951523,0.0015754801,0.000564899,0.002023305,0.0005001812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99397624,0.0009365135,0.0029822458,0.0008441099,0.001183024,0.00007786518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026286878,0.0004559315,0.0010154173,0.00023192671,0.0005148452,0.000046880097,0.0012208344,0.00073012756,0.000044746295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006001252,0.00033096498,0.00057082,0.0012395954,0.002077779,0.00019692864,0.000053391934,0.0006012961,0.0000046784776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012458982,0.00040783884,0.0025131053,0.00027327193,0.00006428654,0.000002680506,0.5872308,0.0005288303,0.0027855318,0.4040954,0.00077134033,0.00008098985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012707005,0.0026071644,0.13464767,0.007785919,0.0020553602,0.00000683044,0.66777503,0.0035097876,0.124390304,0.030202162,0.012083297,0.0022294552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92568266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8991732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37389323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043481126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016973683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132959013","doi":"","title":"Bucking the Trend: A Study of the Local Theologies Contributing to Numerically Growing Anglican Congregations in the Dioceses of Huron and Toronto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Faith; Worship; Church attendance; Prayer; Period (music)","score_opus":0.023203442006423408,"score_gpt":0.3675771074070581,"score_spread":0.34437366540063474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132959013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550516,0.0007764254,0.00007578476,0.003292886,0.00017360678,0.0009600192,0.000003832355,0.000017697084,0.039648153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944973,0.00007343399,0.0000111744,0.0001026204,0.00004835742,0.000048837617,0.0000072171956,0.0000071321574,0.00025150084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984101,0.00054694497,0.00024982204,0.00017196142,0.00043161915,0.00018953787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869883,0.000727698,0.000270413,0.00017970253,0.0000980508,0.000025321518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007786436,0.0001137309,0.00023497257,0.000026649213,0.0004361029,0.000055392702,0.00047220607,0.000064588436,0.000007078849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011219528,0.00005963297,0.00005778591,0.00035398538,0.00019846321,0.00008390679,0.00005943614,0.00013413731,2.0042627e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000576344,0.00009484427,0.0075383727,0.000029831292,0.000032388707,0.0000011303486,0.94702333,0.00006945487,0.00023054592,0.037996504,0.00017556538,0.0067504067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020275237,0.00014648774,0.04144693,0.0000691197,0.00007255971,2.0056663e-7,0.95677274,0.000052334144,0.00014154466,0.0008127097,0.00020892144,0.00007369394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11231116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39963326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2873221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006719714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106500804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89360005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133041863","doi":"","title":"Anglican Stagnation and Growth in West Africa: The Case of St. Paul&apos;s Church, Fajara, The Gambia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wycliffe College","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Church Growth; Christianity; Government (linguistics); Period (music)","score_opus":0.03817666468477091,"score_gpt":0.36345294520408805,"score_spread":0.3252762805193171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133041863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7914097,0.0022632168,0.000005285794,0.0019439482,0.000340748,0.00057844503,0.00002023007,0.000023135637,0.20341535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895132,0.0006836397,0.000010231607,0.000021379903,0.00017378548,0.000050750674,0.000090634036,0.00001523968,0.009441093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869496,0.00031149352,0.00021270859,0.00018625465,0.00033704273,0.0002575392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990067,0.0002886152,0.00027226866,0.00018201285,0.00018887008,0.00006155826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010017599,0.00014577218,0.00017873234,0.00010555762,0.0003757163,0.000075258344,0.0002242147,0.00019935923,0.00009391163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003274424,0.00009469553,0.000052437594,0.00039553482,0.00023826734,0.00012753413,0.000020281288,0.00021977909,0.0000055336864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058107784,0.00011562332,0.0019492166,0.00012887907,0.000027987571,0.000032129432,0.82824135,0.0000017138042,0.00028202313,0.14066038,0.017217608,0.011284966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070829294,0.00012326625,0.14024831,0.00015814391,0.00026431936,0.000022642696,0.8226583,0.000059249065,0.00046423735,0.026117489,0.008638468,0.00053727586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109809615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24937999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1981036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007518509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013292939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8961182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139346918","doi":"","title":"Fishing for Millennials? A Present Hope for the Diocese of Niagara","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Christian ministry; Liturgy; Blessing; Outreach; Fishing","score_opus":0.02556156048102094,"score_gpt":0.30850340168901524,"score_spread":0.2829418412079943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139346918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04620591,0.014220492,0.0044617676,0.010268223,0.002030316,0.00448066,0.0003143663,0.000070504866,0.91794777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83578765,0.006378503,0.0010582069,0.000014861301,0.00020901395,0.000010093435,0.0002150486,0.000013284423,0.15631333],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991876,0.000056904013,0.00010719194,0.00019173691,0.00028125523,0.00017529695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998508,0.0004967943,0.0003327713,0.00018580323,0.00043555655,0.00004112614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039465638,0.00010830948,0.0002669675,0.00004106549,0.0005537794,0.000021232865,0.0005147701,0.00021381662,0.00038480145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024188685,0.00010901857,0.0002774654,0.000057649373,0.000105919855,0.00022906777,0.000027742948,0.000048658847,5.431308e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016936931,0.00020262714,0.000046963254,0.0020050607,0.00047534276,0.0000010989169,0.45559368,0.00008942194,0.00030006494,0.04816886,0.26783058,0.22359262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021944821,0.00032212745,0.013658676,0.0005732379,0.0013144406,7.112827e-8,0.80714756,0.00092208595,0.00028592773,0.0030541883,0.17007089,0.00045633985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56193674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80799466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7895817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016581792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032747854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44456482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7143418433","doi":"10.70675/18f342acz2346z425dzb6ebzae739aa4c8a4","title":"L’existence d’une hiérarchie juridique favorisant la protection des convictions religieuses au sein des droits fondamentaux canadiens","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Legal norm; Millenarianism","score_opus":0.034479992129224854,"score_gpt":0.32746288416870173,"score_spread":0.29298289203947686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7143418433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51369137,0.00024700921,0.0016854139,0.00042346356,0.0023380006,0.0019777631,0.000056276036,0.00026509914,0.4793156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96216923,0.003804488,0.0016714407,0.00008364202,0.0007670177,0.00082494045,0.00036518328,0.00012122257,0.030192854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993372,0.0008128825,0.0013797898,0.0014767919,0.0013127,0.0016458315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955506,0.00046151393,0.0009814933,0.0006914556,0.0013805648,0.0009343823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015284718,0.0010035841,0.00084459357,0.00079714647,0.0067551453,0.00083809235,0.0009249084,0.0016029954,0.0003069087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011910967,0.0010194738,0.00054116675,0.0019375428,0.003470916,0.0011214099,0.000089778914,0.0015659671,0.00017230431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030778407,0.0009033501,0.001929733,0.0010677952,0.0002905268,0.000059128175,0.31474328,0.00006888098,0.016682398,0.6264511,0.0016915194,0.03580456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002993228,0.0022732464,0.055684324,0.0030180258,0.001736387,0.00021568118,0.37749198,0.0005232535,0.037389416,0.44379523,0.06947823,0.0054009855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8598634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.947514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44912276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018622859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011948366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7144394601","doi":"","title":"アングリカニズムの現代的展開 : 英国教会の都市問題との取り組みとそのダイナミックス","year":2003,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gospel; Expression (computer science); Ecclesiology; General partnership; Diversity (politics); Globalization; Movement (music)","score_opus":0.025638181083799418,"score_gpt":0.2931229480498037,"score_spread":0.2674847669660043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7144394601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036349103,0.006240711,0.0023721016,0.0013705859,0.024107642,0.0008976565,0.000778947,0.00033224848,0.92755103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814799,0.0016486942,0.002030261,0.00038231144,0.0033012037,0.000073633186,0.000563186,0.00004154483,0.010479293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941568,0.00062280986,0.000983453,0.0010667479,0.0021646144,0.0010056198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681723,0.00037895763,0.00042755075,0.0009603293,0.0007767493,0.0006392019],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013820548,0.0005715851,0.00050049747,0.00025719323,0.0035904364,0.0007620581,0.0007240831,0.00043624762,0.00057587726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030026338,0.0005906078,0.0003160278,0.0011714654,0.002139768,0.0021081595,0.00018056949,0.0005298227,0.0009904866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007546514,0.0004375677,0.0012229695,0.00011614551,0.000107618434,0.0002847982,0.0042636353,0.00010451459,0.0013160799,0.9449631,0.046660785,0.00044734305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012300025,0.00014470473,0.0008119737,0.00043000773,0.0002709369,0.0002014352,0.0066592162,0.00007639749,0.005005176,0.009717628,0.9743708,0.0010817646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011789696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022766523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94513077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008683154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028904362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148885185","doi":"10.70675/1c18fbd5zd94az48e1z9aa0z19ddac6abe29","title":"L’arbitrage musulman dans les pays non musulmans","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private life; Procedural law; Child custody","score_opus":0.019832298583922228,"score_gpt":0.3138711633740918,"score_spread":0.2940388647901696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148885185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18203668,0.00029276108,0.0026069633,0.00030186222,0.0042478666,0.0011426429,0.000027488926,0.0002089089,0.80913484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82795775,0.0033799675,0.0005017792,0.00018932988,0.0021340086,0.00010668593,0.0010162261,0.000107681015,0.16460659],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375045,0.00035230446,0.0012816547,0.001498204,0.0018020199,0.0013153721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673855,0.00017013476,0.0008568917,0.00080013846,0.00086800766,0.0005662998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011519823,0.0009863495,0.0008404088,0.0004960311,0.0030993957,0.00056115823,0.0013851525,0.0017326322,0.004412334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002562895,0.00094047934,0.0007208379,0.0010602102,0.0010858744,0.0005804952,0.00008378203,0.0007630071,0.0017675374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028320806,0.0011141768,0.0016419543,0.00075465173,0.00030898058,0.00006913584,0.6911852,0.000016775815,0.007677533,0.16191868,0.07581208,0.059217643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002077196,0.0012541185,0.020309629,0.00087522704,0.0013549937,0.0000076754895,0.82652724,0.002136212,0.012200983,0.028860442,0.100439705,0.003956561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12630716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39828023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64592105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004009011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091350026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151903195","doi":"10.70675/64f404e9z1002z47dbz9ab6z6139f5cae50b","title":"La notion d'accommodement raisonnable en matière religieuse : Étude comparée entre la France et le Canada","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Ideal (ethics); Extension (predicate logic)","score_opus":0.009782420500022518,"score_gpt":0.2891821094221649,"score_spread":0.27939968892214234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7151903195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051417373,0.0030522123,0.00044848103,0.005753645,0.0029118778,0.0011130358,0.00006288697,0.00019823744,0.93504226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91973025,0.0035553314,0.00022612483,0.0004190553,0.00031318667,0.00015339044,0.0009879442,0.0000795831,0.074535154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419856,0.0011741886,0.0010536347,0.0010023488,0.0018274065,0.0007438669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976548,0.00073402695,0.00045730508,0.0004724614,0.0003902967,0.0002911253],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015962118,0.00070849794,0.00073387404,0.00023645298,0.0007838838,0.00087280874,0.00086454203,0.0008276032,0.0006249416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000206202,0.000708244,0.00029494546,0.000753776,0.00017384275,0.0005198987,0.00011808507,0.0009200274,0.00023145361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007574743,0.0005037044,0.0006311659,0.0012022854,0.0002534533,0.000072460876,0.11407274,0.0017390989,0.00015864488,0.5626362,0.31313553,0.005518943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022480092,0.00014026673,0.017830674,0.0023550456,0.0007562959,0.0000073528904,0.28762883,0.006475404,0.0009692412,0.019947216,0.6590768,0.0025648726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9746364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86831284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006402061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061236434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162011023","doi":"10.82308/42064","title":"Faith-based arbitration in Ontario: promoting the option to exit and building fraternity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Windsor; Ex parte; Statute","score_opus":0.019939795426726317,"score_gpt":0.3068908784988052,"score_spread":0.2869510830720789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162011023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8628265,0.000029430154,0.0013215978,0.0005016853,0.00035224846,0.00069911574,5.008976e-7,0.000043157048,0.13422577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585027,0.000016138294,0.000667258,0.00027860192,0.000108642205,0.0000800517,0.000094946656,0.000011448409,0.002892646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987379,0.00017406172,0.0002472441,0.00027335505,0.0003622073,0.00020525965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994808,0.000089573354,0.00013906129,0.00010896402,0.00011231625,0.000069286674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010635373,0.0001378339,0.00014662306,0.00022986032,0.00041602898,0.0002795912,0.00014581301,0.00022072863,0.000049258255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023124991,0.000107914086,0.000036539746,0.00024112813,0.00003694637,0.00015113222,0.000007938567,0.00023298914,0.000010390559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003405621,0.00029684877,0.052354563,0.0004490216,0.000037609523,0.0000069938174,0.31732887,0.00095136143,0.011196626,0.55542016,0.0035141034,0.0581033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020987832,0.0005591589,0.7294351,0.0018047497,0.00022820944,0.0000011226639,0.058866628,0.008267621,0.014795633,0.16261986,0.01912459,0.0021985807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6610951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98632765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6770805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017519946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027732766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44006088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162994572","doi":"10.6082/t7n7r-2yn38","title":"Faith-Based Divorce Proceedings: Alternative Dispute Resolutions for Canadian Muslims","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Chicago","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Negotiation; Identification (biology); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01864414601817286,"score_gpt":0.23856549453312673,"score_spread":0.21992134851495387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162994572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29263195,0.00008912277,0.0045870235,0.025386157,0.00055658066,0.0013369921,0.00061987515,0.00012266116,0.6746696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974805,0.000009953065,0.00043897334,0.00012111937,0.000040195995,0.0000017268584,0.000018913499,0.000003503434,0.0018851093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993813,0.000032427426,0.000050912065,0.00012995352,0.00022164594,0.00018374389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995753,0.00004962184,0.00006630729,0.000052143856,0.00013190869,0.00012468145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000233759,0.00004384034,0.00007017431,0.00014912043,0.0017576742,0.000012762965,0.00028346057,0.000029264802,0.00012497089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000679258,0.00005754434,0.000066385655,0.00020659436,0.00021873746,0.00009200079,0.00003403821,0.000065362336,0.00000221486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091246,0.000107348824,0.0040127737,0.000025179557,0.000040119165,0.000006743417,0.097197145,0.0010041076,0.00012160951,0.8324984,0.06316572,0.0017117709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016581878,0.00027712755,0.0042424253,0.000022062959,0.000095694704,5.337962e-7,0.17561594,0.005285356,0.00008938094,0.02539723,0.7869915,0.00032458632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48153985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4913303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80710113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029503173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044942842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163054838","doi":"10.6082/k8zgc-jjw19","title":"Faith-Based Divorce Proceedings: Alternative Dispute Resolutions for Canadian Muslims","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Chicago","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Negotiation; Identification (biology); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01864414601817286,"score_gpt":0.23856549453312673,"score_spread":0.21992134851495387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7163054838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29263195,0.00008912277,0.0045870235,0.025386157,0.00055658066,0.0013369921,0.00061987515,0.00012266116,0.6746696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974805,0.000009953065,0.00043897334,0.00012111937,0.000040195995,0.0000017268584,0.000018913499,0.000003503434,0.0018851093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993813,0.000032427426,0.000050912065,0.00012995352,0.00022164594,0.00018374389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995753,0.00004962184,0.00006630729,0.000052143856,0.00013190869,0.00012468145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000233759,0.00004384034,0.00007017431,0.00014912043,0.0017576742,0.000012762965,0.00028346057,0.000029264802,0.00012497089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000679258,0.00005754434,0.000066385655,0.00020659436,0.00021873746,0.00009200079,0.00003403821,0.000065362336,0.00000221486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001091246,0.000107348824,0.0040127737,0.000025179557,0.000040119165,0.000006743417,0.097197145,0.0010041076,0.00012160951,0.8324984,0.06316572,0.0017117709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016581878,0.00027712755,0.0042424253,0.000022062959,0.000095694704,5.337962e-7,0.17561594,0.005285356,0.00008938094,0.02539723,0.7869915,0.00032458632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48153985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4913303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80710113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029503173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044942842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W835925546","doi":"10.5206/uwoja.v11i1.8815","title":"The Influence of European Colonialism on Zande Customary Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02582770847668129,"score_gpt":0.2561349162807066,"score_spread":0.23030720780402533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W835925546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8944966,0.00004937918,0.00004249994,0.0014503112,0.00023159067,0.00004905761,9.741767e-7,0.0000032044322,0.10367637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865013,0.00042626722,0.00003931303,0.0000849421,0.000038219718,7.3724804e-9,1.3488186e-7,0.0000026238245,0.0007583389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990518,0.00039996314,0.00017319125,0.000052316733,0.00020117135,0.00012157748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903595,0.00013778574,0.0004521867,0.00012476245,0.00020553645,0.000043776057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007619026,0.000052143696,0.00013991591,0.00004148987,0.0006022743,0.000006105627,0.0006119724,0.00004385664,0.00009025509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029729837,0.000034526875,0.000078336794,0.000051685045,0.0037524335,0.0001184158,0.00005632152,0.00015260727,0.000009240385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017482196,0.00034644076,0.06956619,0.000011316014,0.00019864253,0.0001933775,0.543042,0.00014816789,0.00042449168,0.37918448,0.0030174074,0.0021192492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002019668,0.0029786937,0.7894924,0.00014440066,0.00029750916,0.0000800835,0.094517045,0.0000012718722,0.00062778656,0.017287718,0.09234473,0.0002086496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41010526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66722906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71992624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008767858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019500201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93254731","doi":"10.21991/c9jq1j","title":"KEEPING RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM UNDER WRAPS: THE CLOTHING CONTROVERSY IN SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Multiculturalism; Islam; Fundamentalism; Government (linguistics); Law; Human rights; Political science; Secularism; Terrorism; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.030083252814586223,"score_gpt":0.2688753680402263,"score_spread":0.2387921152256401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93254731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017771725,0.0038665703,0.06466682,0.016372796,0.0036687213,0.0016026923,0.00011123725,0.0005332657,0.8914062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404025,0.0007598024,0.00028999514,0.004288623,0.00020280798,0.000055950757,0.00005727333,0.000014708081,0.00029061176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688196,0.00040378346,0.0006305574,0.00048379527,0.0007045471,0.00089537736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851185,0.0002809501,0.00024381281,0.0003152101,0.00041829987,0.00022987896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012715514,0.00029554334,0.00027047217,0.0002732996,0.0028181842,0.0002370963,0.00055787724,0.00015175191,0.00016595348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072294334,0.0002594162,0.0001572345,0.0006585259,0.008358517,0.0008504352,0.00012923128,0.00034804016,0.00027423137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000854124,0.000077025186,0.018882815,0.000008625437,0.00004007897,0.000042071093,0.00380517,0.00029910283,0.000043018885,0.9702482,0.0062724412,0.00019599732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006185491,0.00013859109,0.0250171,0.00080655544,0.00023543976,0.00017537974,0.0770964,0.00061284093,0.00023095206,0.5115291,0.3761784,0.0017937346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00761964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009110857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97626853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005774872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019559793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}