{"meta":{"query_hash":"bec976f06328","filters":{"topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies"},"cohort_total":667,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":667,"exported":667,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bec976f06328","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Rhetoric+and+Communication+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1033953151","doi":"","title":"The Memoirist's Quandary","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Corporation; Broadcasting (networking); Section (typography); Political science; Media studies; Telecommunications; Computer science; Sociology; Literature; Art; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.2680819812431997,"score_gpt":0.3936157345084642,"score_spread":0.1255337532652645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1033953151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025005657,0.026790284,0.0024430687,0.2833287,0.08248199,0.000049188435,0.00022665403,0.00020510491,0.60197437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09423994,0.00968084,0.0015973593,0.059123203,0.017465059,0.00012460627,0.00014198395,0.00049108727,0.8171359],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965113,0.0018669034,0.00010125939,0.00038789122,0.0007562701,0.00037651733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968893,0.0013692474,0.00020786405,0.00036317675,0.0007844045,0.00038600172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004150434,0.00055904186,0.00047719473,0.0010291684,0.008892242,0.009700031,0.0010125928,0.0040222374,0.024675347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00976446,0.0003174988,0.00040215845,0.0007837404,0.006931512,0.00582756,0.0039403993,0.0076663857,0.006910697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033728134,0.000008863189,0.000103869264,0.0001326995,0.000005090793,0.00011724524,0.011309785,0.000021107331,0.00021703965,0.34480232,0.6295336,0.0137147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013892944,0.0000036362546,0.000040661427,0.000075633165,0.0000011109342,0.00003498281,0.001157258,0.0000088335755,0.000063436855,0.003254388,0.99535584,0.0000027607266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070858193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011462949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024675347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004676546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033543282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08254725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109596818","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: A. F. Snoeck Henkeman's \"The use of hyperbole in the argumentation stage\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Argumentation theory; Stage (stratigraphy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Metaphor; Geology","score_opus":0.09787219831592321,"score_gpt":0.23684607063054886,"score_spread":0.13897387231462566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109596818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009017578,0.001530218,0.000106439235,0.9608121,0.035491075,0.000009198779,0.00006324046,0.000015765174,0.0018818504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022724997,0.0012722681,0.00018106269,0.96584654,0.019785564,0.000046158984,0.000029944218,0.000048957914,0.010517054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286324,0.0021020223,0.0005358931,0.0011902007,0.0026437629,0.0006648838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611206,0.023622906,0.0018126081,0.0007650668,0.0104408655,0.002237983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007901929,0.0015722406,0.0018596532,0.0023979626,0.012410138,0.0070356377,0.006647363,0.04784053,0.009860256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060335334,0.00091866,0.0015913578,0.0030620294,0.01131521,0.008918378,0.0053421566,0.06294827,0.0088104475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010096683,0.0000019964768,0.00001855225,0.000037601014,0.0000034481552,0.000052989988,0.00033261685,0.000010282349,0.000016550199,0.0016897648,0.9971107,0.0007153723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018882249,0.000008909243,0.00035228982,0.0004871278,0.000016009117,0.00016609274,0.002159517,0.00007308998,0.0001669156,0.004526947,0.991983,0.000041116913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083935894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15187195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083935894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0098044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0132117765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16689467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110739246","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-07539","title":"How to do things with Fish and MacIntyre: speech act theory, dramatic narrative, and the interpretation of moral utterance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Linguistics; Literature; Epistemology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012605501754940253,"score_gpt":0.2374663328017265,"score_spread":0.22486083104678625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110739246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15117908,0.011075986,0.06945951,0.06766825,0.0008178096,0.00008183545,0.00021817895,0.00015470748,0.69934464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802531,0.0009780114,0.00444233,0.00065365183,0.000064112304,0.000028178452,0.00003884768,0.00006740509,0.013474315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983631,0.0013134708,0.000031193245,0.00009836161,0.000109266446,0.00008468004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712247,0.0020792936,0.00023483079,0.00020902304,0.00021690107,0.00013735874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026680124,0.00042038484,0.0002326815,0.0007759713,0.0029920023,0.007610794,0.0010411176,0.002442514,0.006136001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007862076,0.0002617011,0.00031285404,0.00064084877,0.015988864,0.01085649,0.0017249475,0.0037363144,0.0006638944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041301457,0.000016024876,0.00038627489,0.00006707578,0.000010000731,0.0001442459,0.11883151,0.00021595739,0.00023550184,0.86477643,0.004749822,0.010525902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038897626,0.000043217377,0.0021056335,0.0005673176,0.000037614358,0.00037059904,0.14539419,0.0024603922,0.001199863,0.71063346,0.13710095,0.000047871097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005345963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065373788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007610794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021144012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012234604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020526946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114185767","doi":"","title":"THE GLOBE'S REPRESENTATION OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AND CANADA'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Armenian; Genocide; Acknowledgement; Globe; Political science; Mainstream; Criminology; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law; Ancient history; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03358365196984204,"score_gpt":0.21815768534477686,"score_spread":0.18457403337493483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114185767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33726183,0.0072154943,0.0006606691,0.034220092,0.00071592774,0.000032417156,0.0009454223,0.00007371636,0.61887443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96242046,0.002522501,0.00021793762,0.0016046611,0.00006331499,0.000007057146,0.00015177557,0.000045044537,0.032967336],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982192,0.00023230568,0.00003111436,0.00014998252,0.0007079172,0.0006595393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706787,0.0009078668,0.00033916096,0.00011337264,0.0012046602,0.00036716292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001359856,0.00033232724,0.00029165467,0.0031022027,0.0121935345,0.0104214605,0.00081044756,0.0013777792,0.0071702055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050523896,0.00020394084,0.00015407515,0.0062027294,0.007136248,0.0020663165,0.0030554512,0.0024330853,0.00035068073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020119688,0.000023493745,0.022262853,0.00041530235,0.00005166182,0.0019019983,0.58546335,0.00051977887,0.0018761313,0.2336463,0.08125091,0.0723871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009551138,0.00001750108,0.037740108,0.00061063014,0.00007203862,0.00025650093,0.31608656,0.0002336646,0.0010691219,0.003019289,0.64082634,0.0000587628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.975474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98729545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06335559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06335559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050694373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45967913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122799673","doi":"","title":"Political identities, presumed definitions, and protean portrayals: representations of the public-private healthcare debate in Canadian print media","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Politics; Print media; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Identity (music); Public administration; Sociology; Law; Newspaper; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04736875873783581,"score_gpt":0.25063831307626644,"score_spread":0.20326955433843064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122799673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81140906,0.0021702845,0.0007780612,0.016790168,0.00035167363,0.00006915927,0.0004936116,0.00003526205,0.16790268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936168,0.00079335703,0.00020747572,0.00056914776,0.000085448846,0.00002351119,0.00010764212,0.000022000882,0.0045747403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390185,0.0016705348,0.00017247991,0.00035161045,0.0029166352,0.0009867824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97461647,0.014853982,0.003218406,0.00068262144,0.005145633,0.0014828781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063459743,0.00045173764,0.0003663476,0.010818081,0.020260653,0.016144812,0.0012778899,0.002009225,0.0037348277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02665727,0.0004303515,0.00024185759,0.012022356,0.013507925,0.0039302553,0.0036614933,0.0031511653,0.00027795834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011343086,0.00002629096,0.010666021,0.00014478754,0.000014222147,0.00058869785,0.9432205,0.00010249658,0.00081028783,0.022519184,0.005600739,0.016193306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016671213,0.000029730085,0.04652501,0.00036314892,0.000042640186,0.0001941435,0.8325265,0.000524528,0.0008155075,0.0025665,0.11631281,0.00008269098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85582346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19243002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056478087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026376996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40977907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12682479","doi":"10.1097/01.ccm.0000059313.31477.2c","title":"Commentary on Phillips","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Care Medicine","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.08910028387969864,"score_gpt":0.33321038106381995,"score_spread":0.2441100971841213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12682479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008290293,0.00394099,0.000041369934,0.9245106,0.070370905,0.000009413069,0.00005822578,0.000013478918,0.0009721528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00087816187,0.0021839058,0.00005910531,0.9637694,0.030255865,0.00004493417,0.000019492776,0.000020142103,0.002769031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932653,0.0024695245,0.00059357105,0.0013976159,0.00171214,0.0005618382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582357,0.029309258,0.0010582587,0.0011594502,0.0067841588,0.0034531716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010133554,0.0016458019,0.0034904147,0.0015550177,0.004740774,0.00510533,0.0061046835,0.0477335,0.014047564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064195536,0.0012536377,0.0019148417,0.0021340784,0.005667806,0.007500255,0.003737188,0.06892828,0.00917244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003142467,0.0000065084228,0.000055888093,0.00007796254,0.000011319508,0.00009820731,0.00008541354,0.000011598867,0.000009619375,0.00090346806,0.9965251,0.002183506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012148735,0.000056726378,0.0009346981,0.0017780759,0.00006699099,0.0005292452,0.0010263801,0.0000803852,0.000097922726,0.008096891,0.98712987,0.00008126677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014793578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018292869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0477335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046000555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009039006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053591967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142400849","doi":"","title":"Uncovering Canada's environmental cultural politcs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of Canadian studies = Revue internationale d'études canadiennes","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.043662127400609305,"score_gpt":0.245914589696442,"score_spread":0.2022524622958327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142400849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51672816,0.0026010512,0.0023845858,0.04961052,0.00033554336,0.00008328182,0.001157097,0.000086136984,0.4270137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845116,0.0005797239,0.0006005727,0.0015184814,0.000024180297,0.00001947364,0.00010729395,0.000044516935,0.012594249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613357,0.00059384666,0.00008448127,0.0003753566,0.0014189642,0.0013938686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881765,0.0054334383,0.00083460123,0.0006406599,0.003630444,0.0012843017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035025731,0.00028229313,0.0002838636,0.004761306,0.023779009,0.014093656,0.0013915735,0.002118519,0.008763202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013213449,0.0003663197,0.00020726421,0.009112931,0.0172024,0.0028146065,0.004924489,0.0035503153,0.00030134522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008029159,0.000043612003,0.033083852,0.00018611219,0.000026827376,0.00054345914,0.27576867,0.00050038786,0.00090705877,0.5868727,0.04711913,0.054868013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014932508,0.000017231689,0.05308106,0.00040089016,0.000049814396,0.00014383225,0.3633664,0.0008741886,0.00087251037,0.023174582,0.5579316,0.00007295254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99194264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10967466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10967466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18294227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79574907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485866051","doi":"","title":"Toward an Indigenist Ecology of Knowledges for Canadian Literary Studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Canadian Literature","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Colonialism; Genocide; Criticism; Economic Justice; Anthropology; Environmental ethics; Ecology; History; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.15936811477853444,"score_gpt":0.35837996930233346,"score_spread":0.19901185452379902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485866051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050429884,0.02727916,0.013485555,0.33337086,0.0015883592,0.00012917734,0.00021103826,0.0002722062,0.57323366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91947806,0.010087069,0.015912324,0.0128281405,0.00052037847,0.00015902705,0.00010313133,0.00029488915,0.04061685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918839,0.00345926,0.0002150286,0.00068208197,0.00205494,0.0017047734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841542,0.0058261734,0.000740938,0.0009974435,0.0061262907,0.002154898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014357272,0.001226424,0.0010346457,0.016590532,0.05473007,0.03938763,0.003793122,0.0049907584,0.0062734056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015356659,0.00075398415,0.000532499,0.011445724,0.106895365,0.01405984,0.0101714535,0.010223819,0.0006432977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014874013,0.000010187897,0.0005372322,0.0000856788,0.0000056922377,0.00012247889,0.08901704,0.00011018281,0.00013124687,0.88750976,0.010042952,0.012412631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001929672,0.000009879175,0.002254043,0.0007066873,0.000027598995,0.00016244361,0.18804115,0.0006100784,0.00028523747,0.40586635,0.40195122,0.00006607075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9451347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9707882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22191721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22191721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1994632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90246576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487459737","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i3.483","title":"Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Balance (ability); Action (physics); Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1213658247406551,"score_gpt":0.27601683903559016,"score_spread":0.15465101429493505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487459737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054397665,0.007447118,0.28589857,0.055888094,0.0007837405,0.00030064405,0.00016165427,0.00021641923,0.5949062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94526345,0.0016948493,0.03287112,0.0021922523,0.00060218334,0.0005284709,0.00009041933,0.00011019496,0.016647093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95035815,0.03628377,0.0023599137,0.0027024697,0.006668178,0.0016274827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527149,0.03737879,0.0019636152,0.0027898422,0.0037826544,0.0013701958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03385403,0.00060377526,0.001033364,0.0029973055,0.009042958,0.013516907,0.002057247,0.007047907,0.0059094834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05464334,0.00083084544,0.00073927204,0.0028131746,0.03523795,0.022882622,0.011750037,0.007688903,0.0014107447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023762987,0.0000026254957,0.000025380927,0.000010597532,9.0840854e-7,0.000011909434,0.0014351622,0.000086622196,0.000018668286,0.9974607,0.00015758106,0.00078750117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067776305,0.0000022083839,0.000023550661,0.000027901433,0.000001486684,0.000016969863,0.00040567864,0.0003940495,0.00004638159,0.9886374,0.010433908,0.0000036447063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019023826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093100284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03385403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00885081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059875087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1790393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492216157","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2233","title":"Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Philosophy of Argumentation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Virtue; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06868165977470571,"score_gpt":0.26781529963186307,"score_spread":0.19913363985715737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492216157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016560665,0.24322009,0.017707359,0.45256025,0.013863885,0.000043772325,0.0001197319,0.00014050948,0.27068835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20492041,0.18759261,0.016428083,0.110095195,0.039811045,0.00031669065,0.0001862817,0.00041708033,0.44023263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789715,0.0011407938,0.00007653331,0.00022990744,0.0005726417,0.00008295799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951302,0.0036194343,0.00027276826,0.00017834715,0.0005622361,0.00023712259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002763602,0.00062987086,0.0004937029,0.0021563165,0.0033038226,0.008967108,0.00093265827,0.0045155184,0.009323295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007309612,0.00032563537,0.0002845231,0.0022447351,0.012084532,0.009976781,0.0015807841,0.007028043,0.0040394794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021017606,0.000023606584,0.00012871246,0.0003369176,0.000011851629,0.00008789381,0.004347731,0.0001736698,0.00018786763,0.66905266,0.28983036,0.0357977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012511992,0.000008501799,0.00023203933,0.0007095225,0.0000055279174,0.00013195306,0.0009968327,0.00013613352,0.00008327216,0.19662178,0.8010491,0.0000127496705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008253363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01002985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009323295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043207556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024695918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03134942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498950611","doi":"","title":"Creating Feminist Solidarity: Moving from Isolation to Communication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Feminist philosophy; Gender studies; Sociology; Feminist theory; Isolation (microbiology); Feminism; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06731620557067329,"score_gpt":0.2718033098915607,"score_spread":0.2044871043208874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498950611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092511244,0.009351545,0.03102997,0.15667973,0.0013117574,0.00007462726,0.000032544394,0.00016504883,0.70884347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97006434,0.0016070951,0.0021134266,0.0041658664,0.00039029215,0.00007801668,0.000013916647,0.00012039944,0.021446744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825104,0.013597022,0.00019056104,0.00082679495,0.0016524864,0.0012226832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698944,0.0095211305,0.0011382967,0.0008050292,0.0005958625,0.00095019134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0155945495,0.00075350574,0.00066658825,0.0020436633,0.02328929,0.016437534,0.0015988528,0.0037821662,0.009474008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012560819,0.00037047258,0.00041471186,0.0013785877,0.065070316,0.016357673,0.022550233,0.008568942,0.0011590685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002250802,0.000024129276,0.00018566301,0.00007337805,0.0000047263716,0.00015274042,0.24637684,0.000082024715,0.0002902209,0.73711985,0.0037223315,0.011945554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020774844,0.0000613644,0.00043808343,0.0006682348,0.0000109382445,0.00028064303,0.2454967,0.00032798026,0.0017549753,0.33723688,0.41367528,0.0000281868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002158114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023149136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02328929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068330257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00575407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08247286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502062671","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2010v35n1a2269","title":"Pragmatic Objectivity in Practice: Reading The Globe and Mail Columns of Christie Blatchford","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Ethos; Journalism; Globe; Normative; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Media studies; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017899928760827164,"score_gpt":0.253771128988921,"score_spread":0.23587120022809385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502062671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03557499,0.06566365,0.014471305,0.6177896,0.009984215,0.00005425914,0.00008599665,0.00014595664,0.25622994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.806573,0.02677177,0.009318171,0.0902352,0.0077334912,0.00017069318,0.000082127786,0.0006145374,0.05850104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913026,0.0064318967,0.00012114781,0.00041516696,0.001232839,0.00049628003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97888225,0.017181776,0.0006373982,0.0005595828,0.0020091909,0.0007297395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007960402,0.0007580251,0.0006150411,0.0025330393,0.015099445,0.015656792,0.0013254825,0.0062564225,0.002637332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02029049,0.00044139472,0.00027694047,0.0019605146,0.036289968,0.014418022,0.0039171707,0.010133846,0.00075580925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045686927,0.000033876313,0.00042709944,0.00016461127,0.000012684588,0.000617425,0.31554064,0.00015036631,0.00038529368,0.5003465,0.15725103,0.025024755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014997874,0.000017705723,0.00054546935,0.0007429165,0.000008641647,0.00032815264,0.10651581,0.0002506179,0.00044139574,0.12247878,0.76861775,0.00003776432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05302415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07573624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9469758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011428969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007128418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10543102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506842823","doi":"10.1080/02773941003800063","title":"A Review of:<i>The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture: Considering Mediated Texts</i>, by Deanna D. Sellnow","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Power (physics); Criticism; Literature; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.045910111602933665,"score_gpt":0.2972692920697946,"score_spread":0.2513591804668609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506842823","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037638605,0.99712473,0.000040058938,0.0011390665,0.0005015045,0.0000023133282,0.000010081218,0.000002000328,0.0011426585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00075246353,0.99645555,0.000116869436,0.000945031,0.00055268087,0.0000075440203,0.000023587401,0.0000027824085,0.0011434379],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929476,0.00017934972,0.00007880081,0.00008155771,0.00032289076,0.000042681517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974216,0.0013108857,0.0002592642,0.000035457953,0.00084120245,0.00013161117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014016024,0.00076546695,0.0014557476,0.00426602,0.00070104474,0.00255494,0.0007666404,0.0014704297,0.006084967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004734515,0.000421591,0.00042916593,0.009106152,0.0010824049,0.0033882293,0.0010258299,0.0021119437,0.0034301402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029587329,0.00004400581,0.00024407348,0.028763477,0.00008219932,0.00010899077,0.00058078865,0.00010952226,0.0004831929,0.0066767614,0.34114185,0.6217355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059180343,0.000031790976,0.0010938346,0.011271568,0.000056806708,0.00029277653,0.0003485587,0.0000220259,0.00010897755,0.0013643099,0.98539066,0.000012771817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005002852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013378649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006084967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013886271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00412101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020356297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513116577","doi":"","title":"Aristotle Meets Stuart Hall in the Age of Disciplinary Anxiety","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Rhetoric; Discipline; Persuasion; Meaning (existential); Conviction; Cultural studies; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Media studies; Philosophy; Social science; Law; Political science; Anthropology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1269055807770462,"score_gpt":0.30883790777671194,"score_spread":0.18193232699966574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513116577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057435373,0.093957335,0.0008459185,0.81005335,0.04728303,0.000004338283,0.000020906195,0.000068358735,0.04719232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10334698,0.09376364,0.002732958,0.4470348,0.15380882,0.0000647098,0.000046099558,0.00037431277,0.19882765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682957,0.0014197417,0.00009694699,0.00037872256,0.0010231977,0.0002517606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934994,0.0040787007,0.0002820252,0.00032275106,0.0010163941,0.00080080813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031580026,0.0005898662,0.0007873639,0.0017775706,0.011243993,0.009390775,0.00091727637,0.007199637,0.0069933464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011712251,0.00032077866,0.0002846023,0.0013222741,0.015429311,0.010011278,0.0030937984,0.011246448,0.0031188042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135064865,0.0000072987705,0.000064038504,0.0000477961,0.0000025798217,0.000070832066,0.003173191,0.000019923846,0.000022540406,0.108464524,0.8714622,0.016651575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024595913,0.000003905523,0.00008054871,0.00018704699,0.0000013041282,0.00006052476,0.0022241133,0.000021233753,0.000028769595,0.038886707,0.95849574,0.000007603108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008120441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019711033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011243993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043051606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041129556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031236231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513875593","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i2.4062","title":"Rhetoric, Dialectic and Logic: The Wild-Goose Chase for an Essential Distinction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Discipline; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06032515128667516,"score_gpt":0.2754074053714629,"score_spread":0.21508225408478776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513875593","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028877618,0.058397762,0.1200941,0.48233065,0.0041714176,0.00007567514,0.00015153247,0.00027282335,0.30562848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975599,0.012390365,0.035482556,0.029711276,0.0044785575,0.00025951944,0.00008977532,0.00035413538,0.019673854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927108,0.0050951806,0.00015906525,0.00053638464,0.0010512733,0.0004473036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876183,0.009389067,0.00043502383,0.0012364497,0.00072599354,0.0005951264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009248414,0.00075538224,0.0012891816,0.0036054268,0.0064631198,0.014693081,0.0022674203,0.007491089,0.006055788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01325019,0.00049251225,0.0006576615,0.0022580826,0.072791725,0.031966496,0.0082999505,0.012914812,0.0011710296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007990073,0.00000446778,0.000043424898,0.000024825675,0.0000019540987,0.00001702247,0.001834259,0.000026841035,0.000029468149,0.99392635,0.0016033043,0.0024799625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009445552,0.000010694019,0.000099619494,0.00013458545,0.0000030683707,0.00004905246,0.0029693744,0.00022577068,0.000047901634,0.9685224,0.027920913,0.000007107954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033815939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037652457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014693081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049286033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035497807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048910916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516286393","doi":"","title":"Michelle Obama: Redefining the (White) House-wife","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Candidacy; Wife; Presidential system; White (mutation); Rhetorical question; Race (biology); Persona; Presidential campaign; Conversation; Presidential election; Political science; Gender studies; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Law; Politics; Humanities; Literature","score_opus":0.1264961842461042,"score_gpt":0.23991212583485313,"score_spread":0.11341594158874893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516286393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5494905,0.0051608034,0.008403247,0.054255273,0.0023662609,0.000058649126,0.0000730428,0.00020797532,0.37998423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95027786,0.00044526876,0.0009256893,0.0021759584,0.00014568749,0.000013895652,0.000011850121,0.000065316985,0.04593856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857926,0.0009752475,0.00001652125,0.00010307078,0.00012969624,0.00019618093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894243,0.0005367601,0.00012216321,0.000056819088,0.00012654612,0.00021517786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001715494,0.00027247294,0.00017565578,0.0004521372,0.010435195,0.0037506947,0.00027430555,0.0010310306,0.004374986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003194397,0.0002003876,0.00011597882,0.00032713552,0.0046123452,0.0019285906,0.0026605153,0.0020308604,0.0008431588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013663301,0.000043157434,0.0037806712,0.00010819566,0.0000111719555,0.0021268404,0.6840052,0.00007055973,0.004580386,0.24047722,0.03362095,0.031039111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047349145,0.00006573624,0.0018266392,0.00010556856,0.000008903436,0.0008351514,0.17346874,0.00015056894,0.0029869713,0.0032106233,0.817318,0.0000183441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006830874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019951573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010435195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021047646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095725333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015271187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516297671","doi":"10.1353/mos.2011.a440541","title":"The Rhetoric of Harry Robinson's \"Cat With the Boots On\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Indigenous; Literature; Sociology; Linguistics; History; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05840789323446494,"score_gpt":0.21534350802453578,"score_spread":0.15693561479007084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516297671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084294476,0.011409573,0.013684947,0.11357453,0.0028614306,0.000048321162,0.000041337076,0.00019163883,0.77389383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454264,0.0012191355,0.0019334494,0.0056853984,0.00024915935,0.000026278587,0.000007661213,0.00010506914,0.04534745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655765,0.0025203312,0.000040416253,0.00020946281,0.00043901626,0.00023313133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803,0.0013792613,0.00011144291,0.00010875269,0.00022159093,0.00014878005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002808951,0.00027418032,0.00029781502,0.0007267514,0.007863675,0.006870165,0.0006573131,0.0018561321,0.002361226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005614401,0.00019724801,0.00014441345,0.00060173066,0.022768347,0.0041559064,0.0027793956,0.003572389,0.0005181205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001527632,0.0000039019624,0.00009868276,0.000038281363,0.0000020151701,0.000114273964,0.073515825,0.000037613183,0.00028371363,0.9065803,0.014669977,0.0046401015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014066348,0.000045096313,0.00046698216,0.00034062547,0.000012796347,0.00041052618,0.09214364,0.00029475923,0.0011872761,0.092549436,0.81250674,0.000028061217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010689193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015787777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010689193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046375454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027109834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033647835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523039887","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2002v27n1a1271","title":"Moralizing Uncertainty: Suspicion and Faith in Hitchcock's <i>Suspicion</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Leap of faith; Bad faith; Reading (process); Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Medicine; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05742808075772053,"score_gpt":0.21870275411021578,"score_spread":0.16127467335249523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523039887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51292634,0.013714814,0.028152315,0.12135039,0.001180395,0.0000941406,0.000059183843,0.00017060226,0.32235187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951756,0.00042583485,0.00038975995,0.0014048236,0.00007820165,0.000010215067,0.0000045190013,0.00001412555,0.0024970379],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98745906,0.0092154415,0.00024559302,0.000457917,0.0019621612,0.0006598921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861617,0.010130423,0.0012331046,0.0004750099,0.0013437228,0.00065607094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006036262,0.00040393625,0.00047120426,0.0013186735,0.012973281,0.01195498,0.001115572,0.0050010197,0.0016157988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02134723,0.000418275,0.00032834377,0.0011846072,0.04477136,0.008481297,0.005610412,0.0074780784,0.00019080516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034479526,0.000008420324,0.0007186682,0.0000624393,0.000007588202,0.00086450827,0.7630079,0.00013740572,0.00035448215,0.22544232,0.0042924695,0.0050693257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027572492,0.00009979493,0.00206752,0.0006070104,0.000024903924,0.001923086,0.599039,0.0010979888,0.0013865987,0.16407967,0.2294923,0.00015453342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029275384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013586917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029275384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009484736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034470193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0688169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523632034","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2012v37n2a2515","title":"Defying the News: New Aesthetics of “Truth” in Popular Culture","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Argumentation theory; Aesthetics; Meaning (existential); Constitution; Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07604798957758671,"score_gpt":0.2597377800772309,"score_spread":0.1836897904996442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523632034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13686436,0.002837881,0.03848932,0.04741087,0.0010611472,0.000041645122,0.00007981148,0.00018933484,0.77302563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99387026,0.00018632824,0.0012939691,0.00042571535,0.00017038264,0.000012517058,0.000009565921,0.00005616453,0.0039750384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99189705,0.0056049796,0.00021188232,0.00042242763,0.0013751392,0.0004885152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891621,0.006573084,0.0007781875,0.0017708002,0.0012130495,0.0005028586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008361537,0.00053619355,0.00039561628,0.0037910219,0.008808319,0.015645506,0.0012175413,0.003353844,0.005891669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013872073,0.00043315743,0.0004392421,0.001993905,0.07468159,0.0124569135,0.006808521,0.005473384,0.0004512117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019664025,0.000010234089,0.00026734214,0.00004111022,0.0000047594117,0.000119737604,0.08629293,0.00018372228,0.00023609449,0.90798694,0.0014953021,0.003342172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029260731,0.00002824686,0.0010145721,0.00021961755,0.000026515008,0.00042077975,0.08354417,0.0016780896,0.0007635325,0.80854386,0.103682406,0.000048937265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003406573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042936844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015645506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006305204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018356162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045747638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525309144","doi":"","title":"Fighting Words: Obama, Masculinity and the Rhetoric of National Security","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Rhetoric; Scholarship; Power (physics); Narrative; Mythology; National security; Sociology; International relations; Gender studies; Presidential system; Foreign policy; Politics; Political science; Media studies; Law; Literature; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07095857801707704,"score_gpt":0.25023736977460304,"score_spread":0.17927879175752598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525309144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18466298,0.040897038,0.0102875745,0.10151,0.0035791842,0.000028923057,0.000050524413,0.00007886026,0.65890485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980885,0.0033652273,0.0006955578,0.0032187211,0.0007861464,0.000019817733,0.000012271571,0.000038328424,0.01097899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728143,0.002082048,0.000041766794,0.00013925225,0.00029933578,0.00015612284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953122,0.0038071119,0.00041928963,0.000100552046,0.00022915078,0.00013169732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026893534,0.0005126592,0.00028891148,0.001753898,0.007684211,0.0056341724,0.0005230869,0.002152028,0.0039915955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061029103,0.00015848683,0.00015762133,0.0013953203,0.023488838,0.0062474166,0.003185188,0.003042885,0.00048165224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025288964,0.000012980442,0.0003725727,0.00012373114,0.0000049404407,0.00020488979,0.16958745,0.00005688797,0.0003731991,0.813416,0.007391337,0.008430661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002281018,0.00007320659,0.0011958696,0.0014176784,0.000022220263,0.0006751041,0.19354144,0.0003639778,0.0015496076,0.19947273,0.6016392,0.000026098482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002194382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002255641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007684211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027174966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013894778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019716918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528070086","doi":"","title":"A Rhetoric-Based Analysis of Chinese Public Slogans","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Antithesis; China; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Literature; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.02990567091074473,"score_gpt":0.30543031264396847,"score_spread":0.2755246417332237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528070086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697502,0.0002455386,0.0018610787,0.0002517236,0.000018265097,0.00008497393,0.0004530169,0.000038240712,0.027296929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964384,0.00012508963,0.0010184996,0.000016610962,0.00001368989,0.00003604715,0.00031315724,0.000009822138,0.0020286988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937683,0.000160767,0.000057955873,0.00006888327,0.00022922452,0.00010637477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978429,0.0010091886,0.00037269396,0.00012144202,0.00055432454,0.00009946409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000979942,0.00027749603,0.00023011366,0.00856946,0.0017894522,0.0015695594,0.00028303315,0.00027586633,0.0031086064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033906081,0.0001228319,0.00025582124,0.005118936,0.0019197427,0.0013125002,0.0008688511,0.00039503307,0.00036333592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045116866,0.0001870894,0.32324165,0.0013903091,0.00006723659,0.003637597,0.24156868,0.001295643,0.022963895,0.18490076,0.007697405,0.21259864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026288095,0.00023894223,0.8003648,0.00028459428,0.00014752861,0.0010366787,0.10689955,0.01138577,0.005924871,0.014155962,0.059443716,0.00009140016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010745021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011948757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010745021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024954705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019978962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021364927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528149452","doi":"10.1353/afa.2011.0017","title":"The Amalgamation Waltz: Race, Performance, and the Ruses of Memory (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African American Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waltz; Performativity; Art history; White (mutation); Racism; Sociology; History; Law; Literature; Art; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.04462848544361596,"score_gpt":0.2421790486594932,"score_spread":0.19755056321587722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528149452","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023836887,0.99632025,0.000013397602,0.0017792112,0.0013087477,0.0000020687155,0.000014448829,0.000002826213,0.00053522066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005884056,0.9932326,0.000025351941,0.0024642195,0.0021611429,0.000010814754,0.000047430378,0.000003468365,0.0014665906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935585,0.00017039542,0.00008420042,0.000100639685,0.00020945107,0.0000794337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817777,0.00075934414,0.00029998765,0.000035581816,0.0005417805,0.00018561771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000985656,0.0010818095,0.0014790172,0.0017916441,0.0005766813,0.002987873,0.0016923081,0.002446022,0.017725943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004487177,0.00041474012,0.00074417755,0.0026912868,0.0010907406,0.003263403,0.0011639865,0.0032140145,0.005528166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000729818,0.000024914492,0.00024321121,0.020281963,0.00011297187,0.00009188815,0.0001557551,0.00006126227,0.00010485463,0.0016989862,0.63210213,0.34504905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030695297,0.00004844312,0.0017179264,0.019312846,0.00015336544,0.00062048744,0.00026227065,0.000029106326,0.00005874332,0.0007575084,0.9769826,0.00002590788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050696097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009125207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017725943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013329827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032760485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05929917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530348084","doi":"10.1002/9781118350508.ch37","title":"Tony Harrison's<i>The Trackers of Oxyrhynchus</i>","year":2012,"lang":"fa","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"BitTorrent tracker; Art; Art history; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03743698397149058,"score_gpt":0.2369108666122837,"score_spread":0.1994738826407931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530348084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043330127,0.012662761,0.0034562857,0.1551519,0.006569809,0.000043584547,0.00045850527,0.0004628302,0.8168614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057795364,0.0038124593,0.0018661857,0.015634444,0.0019651144,0.00007205724,0.00013821454,0.0007440098,0.9179721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999151,0.0003655498,0.00002153968,0.00011452152,0.00022470133,0.0001226666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801254,0.0010082395,0.000098779805,0.00018759225,0.000363203,0.00032959436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015184856,0.00052502006,0.00025854076,0.0024125825,0.009055131,0.0076733613,0.000753825,0.0039257556,0.048406452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050308458,0.00028259231,0.00021522935,0.0015913736,0.0042877845,0.009210758,0.0023747098,0.00436805,0.00914109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014946589,0.000012963785,0.0002444848,0.000043897006,0.0000012846918,0.000049170332,0.0058550728,0.000017469534,0.000121232755,0.17353326,0.7786013,0.041504998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019579793,0.0000045458614,0.0003674946,0.00012253156,0.0000014110183,0.000070837414,0.0033467403,0.000031486295,0.00018207367,0.011410071,0.98445433,0.000006608376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027422292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09818207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048406452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003225342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00274568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16193569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532866413","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2002v27n1a1269","title":"Silences and Lies: How the Industrial Fishery Constrained Voices of Ecological Conservation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Overfishing; Opposition (politics); Fishery; Vernacular; Political science; Fishing; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.15420846269176824,"score_gpt":0.22773672972891573,"score_spread":0.07352826703714749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532866413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6702627,0.005379482,0.0053719073,0.06434062,0.00070446084,0.000050265502,0.000073581796,0.00006129027,0.25375572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99420327,0.00063574436,0.00018898389,0.0013552111,0.000106607906,0.00001942404,0.000015646283,0.00003460161,0.0034403135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98759896,0.008582339,0.00017672668,0.0006579375,0.0014035109,0.001580635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97468764,0.020595636,0.0015799487,0.0006570509,0.0013230875,0.0011566147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013857841,0.00058236386,0.0004948527,0.0027823825,0.031061666,0.011699332,0.0024253966,0.004479885,0.0033285774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026089689,0.000591128,0.00029282682,0.0022803466,0.0522072,0.012886334,0.010191472,0.0069869026,0.0004074525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011435505,0.0000031571599,0.0005519102,0.000022420232,0.0000017487748,0.0001906414,0.97600126,0.000017998642,0.00013283212,0.020289816,0.00071242754,0.0020642632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005926066,0.000010924471,0.001069916,0.00019212443,0.0000070545725,0.00013724963,0.93183947,0.000103660954,0.00026892245,0.00953287,0.056814563,0.000017318658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11161118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12279659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11161118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01578479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010249178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22192305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533468349","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i2.2242","title":"Shaping the Adversary Culture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Rhetorical question; Adversary; Reflexivity; Presumption; Epistemology; Style (visual arts); Face (sociological concept); Rhetoric; Subject (documents); Sociology; Rhetorical device; Sensationalism; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Media studies; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Computer security; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.11290439190249243,"score_gpt":0.2664940580452732,"score_spread":0.15358966614278077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533468349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26176116,0.004293415,0.078457475,0.08897811,0.0012505965,0.00015973176,0.00006631684,0.00027475745,0.56475836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98134446,0.00048707708,0.002346024,0.0024794743,0.00016538965,0.000041812982,0.000014500858,0.00012369265,0.012997583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96841455,0.022207303,0.0007448264,0.0027483779,0.0040421234,0.0018427811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764764,0.014398644,0.0021511465,0.002251108,0.0023208598,0.0024017717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028424144,0.0007478252,0.000575084,0.002931605,0.018621627,0.023570325,0.002679823,0.003713569,0.006810112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036495645,0.00056057743,0.00048752473,0.0012865737,0.047073,0.019024495,0.021254698,0.009861224,0.0012935989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024094972,0.000021316164,0.0010052017,0.00005201314,0.000016154523,0.0003072257,0.17564762,0.00019696329,0.0009148325,0.8116196,0.002404827,0.0077901687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003346591,0.0001041735,0.0012690675,0.0005881328,0.00004687624,0.00063545187,0.17011964,0.0023233534,0.0031078255,0.35050493,0.47118953,0.000077628014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027229814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002419843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028424144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008622258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047574253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15032303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536168597","doi":"","title":"“United Breaks Guitars”: Examining in Anti-Corporate Protest Music","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MUSICultures","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guitar; Dissent; Battle; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Trial by ordeal; Media studies; Literature; Musical; History; Political science; Sociology; Law; Art; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.25590413546587143,"score_gpt":0.2459587241071629,"score_spread":0.009945411358708522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536168597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7717573,0.005226544,0.0025886055,0.020003427,0.0008979115,0.0000721863,0.0000357685,0.000050149894,0.19936803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904631,0.0007827786,0.00033400752,0.0011946846,0.00018204219,0.000024149456,0.000016135251,0.000028072694,0.0069751665],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924354,0.0055182637,0.00009623013,0.00037677953,0.0007606417,0.0008127912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905252,0.0068634013,0.0009151402,0.00039022995,0.0005875498,0.00071850803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063368464,0.0007064271,0.00039494422,0.0043475972,0.024118768,0.010002203,0.0014976057,0.0039727227,0.0044316296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013356129,0.0003121218,0.00025149592,0.0023479506,0.023894088,0.005935071,0.0068607037,0.00402847,0.00040079653],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004112166,0.00006350954,0.0019675072,0.000082158156,0.000006102596,0.0012515042,0.9348709,0.00002188162,0.0006617133,0.047561694,0.0036211007,0.009850825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011205386,0.000042234435,0.0034542514,0.00024101905,0.000008308954,0.00055565144,0.91396296,0.00011183357,0.0007889419,0.0049294652,0.0758815,0.000012621006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009041077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021157948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024118768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068876315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002870775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049973488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540835822","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977800","title":"Ethics and the Media: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Journalism; Media ethics; Political science; Social media; Citizen journalism; Democracy; Public sphere; Digital media; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Engineering ethics; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.13934088994079027,"score_gpt":0.26598615960802935,"score_spread":0.12664526966723907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540835822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018206907,0.18747377,0.0091392845,0.03680311,0.008007381,0.000114223076,0.0001315388,0.000101469515,0.7564085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.076153256,0.29609567,0.014690668,0.03538681,0.023234876,0.0008428664,0.00034150595,0.00046296616,0.5527915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852115,0.000742647,0.00006017635,0.000110887486,0.0004349489,0.00013018635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987545,0.00088819186,0.00005096664,0.00004832867,0.00015233106,0.00010568805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088673,0.0009600176,0.0006002849,0.0018948583,0.0031175073,0.006682686,0.0009918436,0.0036386447,0.015202107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001850729,0.0004695782,0.00041605995,0.0018312641,0.008048135,0.007519682,0.0033319963,0.005066337,0.004485281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011527324,0.00006206116,0.000120850906,0.00035442633,0.0000041594603,0.00017657255,0.00405504,0.00029143874,0.00020651119,0.8039696,0.14652967,0.044218127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023408147,0.000010929953,0.0001147732,0.00056333403,0.0000011272709,0.00018482772,0.000884256,0.000084190615,0.000037255755,0.117805935,0.8803049,0.000006167931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019517897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022105123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015202107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034959503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025231962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050856113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545495498","doi":"","title":"Doubt, Conviction and the Analytic Process: Selected Papers of Michael Feldman","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of psychoanalysis","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Session (web analytics); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022424035696018405,"score_gpt":0.2423069250593364,"score_spread":0.219882889363318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545495498","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030220954,0.75834,0.0019144262,0.19686854,0.006144671,0.00005205337,0.000057415917,0.000024206973,0.03357656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13936777,0.7470034,0.006365591,0.031241035,0.015147313,0.00029414636,0.00009099073,0.00015292731,0.060336877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959383,0.0025420592,0.0001635055,0.0003022715,0.0008504984,0.0002033016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889432,0.009088337,0.00036203853,0.00015593639,0.0010116901,0.00043875253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010615682,0.0010889517,0.0010030359,0.0028473106,0.0061944043,0.006536184,0.00140628,0.0029927208,0.0023969861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01697069,0.0007487979,0.00049251673,0.004082709,0.01712232,0.009656175,0.0023334224,0.007084947,0.0006651458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013281347,0.00011578122,0.00059618196,0.0011603563,0.000049218,0.00044585223,0.059982024,0.00041250425,0.00024662592,0.39147368,0.45293915,0.09244575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005628153,0.000038781942,0.0012311549,0.0049341954,0.000029646859,0.00045256724,0.018148182,0.00023941936,0.00029988645,0.15394449,0.82056457,0.000060880036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020444443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019715814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020444443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013614559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075088073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09878099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545932476","doi":"","title":"Morals and the media : ethics in Canadian journalism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Wonder; Reading (process); Political science; News media; News values; Media studies; Media ethics; Technical Journalism; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.024389197984231472,"score_gpt":0.18276202204435862,"score_spread":0.15837282406012715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545932476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010748695,0.08499321,0.0025613797,0.33129093,0.006867498,0.00006992609,0.00007561873,0.00010692353,0.56328577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6601738,0.059144568,0.006297094,0.06029384,0.003286435,0.0001319395,0.00010069057,0.00032753433,0.21024416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855488,0.0046133134,0.00042547245,0.0007469268,0.006473086,0.0021924935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880641,0.005050685,0.000480591,0.0003619232,0.004091248,0.0019515227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009510463,0.00075309194,0.00062314986,0.0042179544,0.040321566,0.026596874,0.002562177,0.007963143,0.005344675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016191732,0.0005867956,0.000399235,0.0058554183,0.07219878,0.008507232,0.0060138516,0.007640818,0.0006629725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015392165,0.000012778379,0.00035142692,0.00014883601,0.0000049339046,0.00021046548,0.05964924,0.00014955213,0.00011175616,0.8088627,0.10811094,0.022371968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008311114,0.0000066895323,0.0014371448,0.0004240291,0.000008318981,0.0001480353,0.031636097,0.00026272045,0.00012399057,0.09101616,0.87485224,0.0000763655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95361835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9655666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19082083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19082083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2117394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551210841","doi":"","title":"Translation Quality Assessment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vitae (Universidad de Antioquia)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Style (visual arts); Quality (philosophy); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology; Statistics; History","score_opus":0.1180781135878321,"score_gpt":0.34583999677615423,"score_spread":0.22776188318832213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551210841","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06805771,0.009469668,0.69219834,0.018671956,0.006936405,0.07315676,0.0122854365,0.004574828,0.11464891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21915826,0.0042649265,0.67475,0.0032531011,0.00090212276,0.051572748,0.008934586,0.0022562514,0.034908026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6826453,0.18079042,0.058791894,0.01085021,0.06459359,0.0023285237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46324638,0.15465182,0.023616731,0.06922163,0.28613576,0.0031276792],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28628406,0.0014090006,0.0031547935,0.01419653,0.004629951,0.0082914615,0.0028930206,0.0019681614,0.029127318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46757197,0.00085287786,0.0028177975,0.012784271,0.0035553172,0.0046388176,0.007739858,0.0028113078,0.007972171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000706944,0.00027340272,0.007665159,0.010587209,0.000402808,0.00035957823,0.036305953,0.000973746,0.006019741,0.0353524,0.04971338,0.8516398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005155653,0.0013263756,0.02583662,0.014397152,0.0010723443,0.0010431902,0.019249255,0.009824481,0.0200535,0.053326897,0.8527961,0.0005585238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020980872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025393423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28628406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005731901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024103392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8801388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551690830","doi":"","title":"An Essay on \"An Essay on Criticism\": Derision as Inspiration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œalbatross","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Style (visual arts); Literature; Tone (literature); Argumentative; Intimidation; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.08428750771118959,"score_gpt":0.29937150063017176,"score_spread":0.21508399291898217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551690830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022558285,0.04252943,0.01257988,0.4504294,0.04166304,0.00004798482,0.00005411754,0.00013003634,0.4300078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68594706,0.020167593,0.0049163694,0.0586774,0.031635623,0.00012596056,0.00008016228,0.00041194807,0.19803785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952626,0.0031673023,0.00008001415,0.00025214418,0.0010306032,0.00020734247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893911,0.007974225,0.00038234433,0.0004339879,0.0013469203,0.00047131185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004230519,0.00052832754,0.00033597814,0.0010431618,0.0050663226,0.006294762,0.0009210325,0.0031501974,0.0042252713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015759453,0.00014038559,0.0002749565,0.00077725196,0.013325356,0.005597012,0.004319773,0.007497271,0.0009920318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042598807,0.000029623385,0.0002857731,0.0002007019,0.000011911992,0.0003723169,0.04778694,0.0001048621,0.0005329447,0.7018684,0.22212395,0.02663989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009187342,0.000024060562,0.00022797917,0.00044807926,0.000007013197,0.00024531456,0.008945942,0.00010677253,0.0003516654,0.064448945,0.9251743,0.000010899963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006002869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011029515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006294762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025080922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019389099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022373378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551984050","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2013v38n4a2649","title":"Rhetoric of Oil in Canadian News: Framed for Indigenous Care","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Indigenous; Politics; Representation (politics); Political rhetoric; Emancipation; Sociology; Economic Justice; Media studies; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03131945651035283,"score_gpt":0.24026774142561877,"score_spread":0.20894828491526593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551984050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25076646,0.010028609,0.0036952768,0.11589159,0.005385705,0.00008980177,0.00049530953,0.00018839253,0.6134589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97301596,0.0027853558,0.0007837748,0.0038766859,0.0007671126,0.000025005893,0.00008378134,0.000078455145,0.018584019],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960465,0.0010150723,0.00008473505,0.00029200254,0.0018195339,0.0007421196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98748815,0.006840185,0.00077601604,0.0003377065,0.0036352365,0.0009226965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043847733,0.00059363095,0.00033852636,0.0043200376,0.01877267,0.011784787,0.001276477,0.0024460033,0.005901264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017667158,0.00029039555,0.00022855659,0.004113776,0.0128098065,0.003396078,0.0033571576,0.0044397064,0.00047635328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019159436,0.000036193873,0.0050957524,0.00045126383,0.000022550983,0.0016423425,0.6666603,0.00026191887,0.0025903403,0.21486987,0.057404585,0.050773215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016276366,0.00002970113,0.006750689,0.0006358551,0.000046437857,0.00026249466,0.25783783,0.00044528994,0.0019213059,0.005437743,0.7265487,0.00006774431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82286125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87140924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17713875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06504262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035024397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47191948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556621809","doi":"","title":"On Building Communities, Not Audiences","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visual arts; Aesthetics; Architectural engineering; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.06881423022989483,"score_gpt":0.26723406180727255,"score_spread":0.19841983157737772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556621809","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073110405,0.55934346,0.0036250185,0.12827834,0.0048877844,0.0000796666,0.00027892334,0.00010901353,0.2960868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33090013,0.5730863,0.0062503326,0.02287127,0.0023220652,0.00024142307,0.0003706913,0.0003988495,0.06355887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879892,0.004477679,0.00034787576,0.00076528435,0.004607579,0.0018123881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97539276,0.012501586,0.0010305564,0.001168882,0.007890399,0.0020158726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016167725,0.0012198462,0.0011503263,0.010465786,0.014520238,0.013443995,0.0035501418,0.004242409,0.017327711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021374742,0.00046256566,0.0004910214,0.014645271,0.026759297,0.012219524,0.005944582,0.0058862255,0.002231388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050226103,0.000042102096,0.0004869072,0.0037547005,0.000035929912,0.00013826854,0.026125401,0.0003475991,0.00034231684,0.56795007,0.14220457,0.258522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010789573,0.0000146536795,0.0011013959,0.0049936706,0.000035876215,0.00006841243,0.016874919,0.00006694388,0.00019105872,0.022791661,0.9538277,0.000023080998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65006375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7922982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65006375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046918944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11272165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70399415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558033897","doi":"10.5130/tfc.v1i2.279","title":"Peats Ridge: a sandy track, citrus farms, springs, valleys, dams and the politics of ground water","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transforming Cultures eJournal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exhibition; Politics; Resource (disambiguation); The arts; Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Visual arts; Archaeology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.022943686305736344,"score_gpt":0.25052374304370756,"score_spread":0.22758005673797121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558033897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52802676,0.013357406,0.0017762423,0.05023221,0.0007155007,0.00002080235,0.00007394546,0.00005072692,0.40574643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409847,0.0024923484,0.00032334795,0.00087918935,0.00009411004,0.000008554644,0.000009790118,0.000029614388,0.055178244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955195,0.00020021305,0.000008207654,0.000042671905,0.00009078925,0.000106087624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995345,0.00023153856,0.000061014183,0.000018120494,0.00003881124,0.00011602411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063053844,0.0002252799,0.00016118976,0.00043295804,0.006349172,0.0059237387,0.00043181403,0.00104276,0.0045591337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008961491,0.00014136471,0.00007692939,0.0005790264,0.016980207,0.0024234175,0.0020063166,0.0015231147,0.00026155866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055444198,0.000041621814,0.0049588103,0.00015868912,0.000008047162,0.0021425074,0.5254381,0.00021282857,0.001786811,0.39441702,0.035807844,0.034972288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059328127,0.000039969284,0.01033665,0.00031494754,0.0000067298843,0.0007268743,0.5596017,0.00013007852,0.0007874563,0.017195208,0.41083372,0.000020665075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060047302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21032612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060047302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044162394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038699864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119395554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564530973","doi":"10.22329/il.v29i3.2845","title":"What Does an Argument Culture Look Like?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Negotiation; Contingency; Conviction; Subjectivity; Closure (psychology); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03986473648003297,"score_gpt":0.26340109997132033,"score_spread":0.22353636349128736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564530973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50651586,0.008267591,0.020685768,0.1981837,0.001802805,0.00010625499,0.00025235824,0.00022053257,0.26396507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309194,0.0007765066,0.0025069262,0.002329832,0.00009462367,0.00004196578,0.000041131214,0.000050777966,0.0010662776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775065,0.016394366,0.0008714654,0.0011064351,0.0026685412,0.001452673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96044517,0.021390466,0.005422358,0.0026436,0.005249556,0.004848889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015565101,0.00044252185,0.0006599775,0.0029496944,0.008269435,0.024073675,0.0013076445,0.0035755732,0.0029031052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03849299,0.00037233316,0.000558121,0.0026634422,0.024945403,0.0177775,0.0050536166,0.003935108,0.00077245204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017728376,0.00017175543,0.058787998,0.000877187,0.0001702554,0.0012914249,0.311845,0.00034843374,0.0020121548,0.5485741,0.012658321,0.0630861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044173194,0.00014142838,0.031965934,0.0015166851,0.00010609429,0.0012530057,0.55426323,0.000660555,0.0012467229,0.32447764,0.08417415,0.00015039057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020509681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024893023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024073675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00485898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038483979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082317114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575075381","doi":"10.5860/choice.38-1376","title":"Beyond public speech and symbols: explorations in the rhetoric of politicians and the media","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12010720207977246,"score_gpt":0.3108011555630638,"score_spread":0.19069395348329135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575075381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06381419,0.26304528,0.0055002896,0.14713566,0.011332683,0.00010256468,0.00042776795,0.00009834187,0.5085433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8379783,0.07753724,0.002196573,0.008163688,0.01701092,0.00021781065,0.00023636833,0.00035181147,0.05630729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823976,0.0010791547,0.000050119637,0.00018296092,0.00027626383,0.00017165362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884494,0.01019299,0.00032542125,0.00019574992,0.00045473172,0.00038169418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026962867,0.0007421252,0.00075114885,0.0064134067,0.008569075,0.013505155,0.0010309642,0.0026851697,0.00983428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007690234,0.00054573576,0.00036804136,0.007922089,0.01687404,0.012734579,0.0032134494,0.0063985772,0.000786518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010756832,0.000100532976,0.0014450419,0.00048618307,0.0000142806275,0.00039309985,0.18923713,0.00020370136,0.0007579063,0.66734165,0.080916755,0.05899618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021412478,0.000056557168,0.0071816044,0.0019188422,0.000014138686,0.00030386125,0.10874627,0.00047969338,0.00027745942,0.105448976,0.7755113,0.000039753264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008554294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007827034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013505155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061780997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022614605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044825435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575828019","doi":"10.3138/topia.22.97","title":"Race Comedy and the Misembodied Voice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comedy; Ethnic group; Imitation; Entertainment; Realm; Race (biology); Style (visual arts); Sociology; Gender studies; Ambivalence; Identity (music); Comics; Politics; White (mutation); Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Psychology; Anthropology; Visual arts; History; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05672416889294378,"score_gpt":0.2749551950828275,"score_spread":0.21823102618988371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575828019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12701233,0.007170679,0.004739003,0.045133144,0.0010927866,0.000028942639,0.00002261037,0.000046947098,0.81475365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674187,0.00063350383,0.0003799325,0.0026310394,0.00018109489,0.000016276312,0.000007020251,0.000030704687,0.02870178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979487,0.0011609074,0.00004331219,0.00023329204,0.0003233091,0.00029041638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979138,0.0012807247,0.0001674985,0.0001825558,0.0002465478,0.00020879289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021988112,0.0002950007,0.00025110107,0.0010709811,0.010966909,0.0055166855,0.00049378193,0.0021315687,0.0051723765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051062554,0.00018276526,0.0001926163,0.00043794306,0.027342882,0.0063547213,0.0054471535,0.003999503,0.00051155937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024638704,0.000009367275,0.0004264505,0.00004372076,0.0000029018522,0.00031933637,0.11175748,0.000016838841,0.00035120622,0.8749889,0.0032101958,0.008848896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032999505,0.0000895481,0.0017327274,0.0006049676,0.000024752804,0.0011067595,0.21983849,0.00027308273,0.0020389042,0.247895,0.52632886,0.00003396322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005987693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008499798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010966909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003275619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017038283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023766398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576906371","doi":"","title":"Camping Out With the Lesbian National Parks and Services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Spectacle; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.04179311510780976,"score_gpt":0.2480741361908987,"score_spread":0.20628102108308893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576906371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10549803,0.012552143,0.0019237973,0.15218192,0.0018180637,0.00006152184,0.000107952874,0.00007912989,0.7257775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68187577,0.0071697677,0.0015295512,0.0181863,0.00029445696,0.000078396624,0.0000517726,0.00008728727,0.29072678],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774843,0.0010005706,0.00003180436,0.0001515138,0.0004293589,0.0006383624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998279,0.00050711865,0.00017703109,0.000060089737,0.00034679918,0.0006299997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024036178,0.00034371967,0.00026140158,0.001346345,0.03493509,0.008393203,0.0007177134,0.0021565906,0.025764367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031021128,0.00020649433,0.00019021625,0.0016547393,0.010941353,0.004451967,0.0071364036,0.0039021592,0.0013387091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002858991,0.000035853285,0.0045469785,0.00015585977,0.000005263499,0.0007942798,0.4311929,0.00004624167,0.0005251777,0.42664534,0.086462125,0.049561374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027274698,0.000012245396,0.0024594832,0.0002483822,0.0000037969503,0.00016943872,0.31531534,0.00002159042,0.0001421146,0.003939788,0.67767453,0.000010559937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40972146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.731654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40972146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015988255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026076987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81467324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578193204","doi":"10.22329/il.v25i2.1115","title":"Pluralism, Disagreement, and the Status of Argument in the Public Sphere","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Attribution; Identity (music); Function (biology); Positive economics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.059782170620564186,"score_gpt":0.2602218745834,"score_spread":0.20043970396283584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578193204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20620294,0.007548186,0.04085783,0.121132575,0.0010869735,0.000085916385,0.00006094342,0.0000874756,0.6229372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932713,0.0004770389,0.0014691039,0.0008915486,0.00035554363,0.000051307987,0.000015345788,0.000029651123,0.0034391773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9480968,0.03908878,0.0015725399,0.0025091053,0.006404849,0.0023279022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90648824,0.07790993,0.0063579786,0.003810931,0.0036518357,0.0017810563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037105262,0.00055819895,0.0010943422,0.0050855977,0.017123517,0.028866524,0.0020681364,0.009597873,0.0049535036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07696812,0.0005150764,0.00059197773,0.0036053136,0.08808519,0.0292261,0.012351866,0.008240294,0.00049739314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016149903,0.000014700168,0.0003009212,0.000031105094,0.0000043936493,0.00005805785,0.02132947,0.00008168734,0.0000605262,0.9748283,0.0006295407,0.0026451892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029640052,0.000015324793,0.0003889134,0.00012984152,0.0000072783214,0.000054454773,0.01273762,0.00037018492,0.00014010887,0.97072077,0.015394931,0.0000108176655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013226401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009863696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037105262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008389032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050773914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19623375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583554234","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2163","title":"Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Communication studies; Political communication; Critical theory; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Criticism; Informal logic; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037260885695353664,"score_gpt":0.2732579846752149,"score_spread":0.23599709897986124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583554234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078639634,0.022846289,0.28715307,0.20182818,0.002229997,0.00037551165,0.000080692844,0.00014791693,0.40669873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563028,0.004028986,0.028049525,0.003292312,0.0012977404,0.00043197145,0.000033351243,0.00007924633,0.0064840135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762699,0.018970039,0.000525451,0.00093996915,0.0025728336,0.00072175235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94626904,0.04639611,0.0025917755,0.0016148407,0.0022187794,0.00090950815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02225784,0.0009730342,0.0009334419,0.0052667293,0.008866292,0.023730312,0.0025131328,0.007390274,0.002406779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034752745,0.0006863846,0.0006613249,0.0035162887,0.114227995,0.031584483,0.006653121,0.010203187,0.00034306786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005869078,0.000006502787,0.000048194343,0.00002527293,0.0000018165056,0.000025551217,0.008293396,0.00014703709,0.00003405453,0.98915464,0.0004496806,0.0018079914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010181752,0.0000042469082,0.000040599236,0.00007456063,0.0000022956938,0.000019602796,0.00270405,0.00040459452,0.000055083838,0.98733485,0.009344799,0.0000051175252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017612451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00130736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023730312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010558726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068785707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11771208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588345304","doi":"10.7176/nmmc.vol3310-16","title":"A Fantasy-Theme Analysis of the Reportage “The China Diaries – Discovering the New China along the Trail of the Long March” in the Global and Mail","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Fantasy; China; Theme (computing); Prosperity; Newspaper; Symbolic convergence theory; Sociology; Convergence (economics); History; Media studies; Literature; Political science; Law; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.07957265136305308,"score_gpt":0.310042178923204,"score_spread":0.23046952756015093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588345304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6777452,0.00090202846,0.013971324,0.0073492103,0.00033559348,0.00014831773,0.00029892908,0.000062849555,0.2991865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98544747,0.0002590503,0.0023030844,0.00023809113,0.000057244084,0.00005575418,0.00009554808,0.0000461386,0.011497695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989153,0.0005918325,0.00002031867,0.00008471766,0.00025883436,0.00012890236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997721,0.0015759191,0.00018410107,0.00015483952,0.00023264499,0.00013141749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018926824,0.00036846247,0.0001703933,0.0024232436,0.0045969305,0.003750969,0.0005591428,0.0006395299,0.0033607874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037871664,0.00015889508,0.00024045548,0.0020705804,0.009735585,0.003649146,0.002313304,0.0017688283,0.00019769256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006933542,0.000016534355,0.0024977706,0.00010078878,0.000006802273,0.0006275599,0.70271796,0.00009074101,0.0013833502,0.27509394,0.0037151,0.0136801405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019377783,0.000059924132,0.0126985265,0.00023267571,0.000027872677,0.00092756347,0.75595474,0.0012386616,0.0027661945,0.031034568,0.1949987,0.000041213305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096478835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01771721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045392355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018767241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032934606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588649125","doi":"","title":"Ottawa vs. Washington: Comparing the Role of Opinion Referents in Canadian and American Coverage of Nafta","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Politics; Political science; Focus (optics); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015867239580719568,"score_gpt":0.24065727345577484,"score_spread":0.22479003387505528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588649125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8716724,0.0016690185,0.0001841877,0.0055219065,0.00013652716,0.000038496328,0.00039191113,0.000012103442,0.12037347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956477,0.0006268296,0.000064951026,0.00050565077,0.0000306039,0.000010746391,0.0001465749,0.000011340583,0.0029554847],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957541,0.00084087887,0.00010754537,0.00033402778,0.0018569004,0.0011066075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842048,0.007989396,0.0018732534,0.0003246703,0.0047484217,0.00085944735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046068993,0.0002997075,0.00042723052,0.004424631,0.0149457725,0.00799711,0.0009959219,0.0015205867,0.004845536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026553769,0.0002382033,0.00026294283,0.0072847274,0.005509308,0.0026257394,0.0029308703,0.0023088525,0.00023272455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005479935,0.000056175042,0.067133255,0.00021288432,0.000056180503,0.0007064277,0.87547135,0.00013875944,0.0010447515,0.0200934,0.008550821,0.025988037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002377099,0.000057215388,0.1524549,0.0003709441,0.00012256327,0.00013573999,0.75541186,0.00025365566,0.0007862987,0.0011346093,0.089133084,0.000115213224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9705592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97912645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05111385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05111385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027599433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37085867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588833486","doi":"","title":"Carol Jacobs and Henry Sussman, eds. Acts of Narrative","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International fiction review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; History; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.029568804321706495,"score_gpt":0.27517720853102323,"score_spread":0.24560840420931673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588833486","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033599732,0.9539652,0.0006693072,0.014621048,0.0028259538,0.000007463521,0.000061997,0.000031191415,0.02748187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007715951,0.96022046,0.0011287571,0.0016659645,0.002958087,0.000024678848,0.00010780922,0.000034903864,0.02614337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991647,0.00035676543,0.000063343025,0.0000668713,0.0002919016,0.000056352957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963714,0.00237247,0.00026753478,0.00010701692,0.0006941878,0.00018750428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001982398,0.001191571,0.00095337006,0.004865009,0.0017713432,0.0053488975,0.0009994793,0.0023237914,0.013581108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052842707,0.0006928741,0.00041382905,0.004418158,0.0026381186,0.009043953,0.0015294214,0.0020888387,0.007326474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040254712,0.000029554856,0.00020831327,0.0022462022,0.00001692607,0.0001206385,0.0044921534,0.00021367305,0.000102532016,0.03928802,0.6690224,0.28421938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004095899,0.0000072700104,0.00037479133,0.0020492938,0.0000112416,0.00027973726,0.0016762959,0.00004358493,0.00008399892,0.009020803,0.98644185,0.0000070020697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008283862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017179124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013581108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019924906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036247876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045433283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590701094","doi":"","title":"Rhetorically Constructed Africana Mothering in the Antebellum: The Racial Uplift Tradition of Mary Ann Shadd Cary","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Pan-African Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scholarship; Literal and figurative language; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Gender studies; Sociology; Racism; Literature; Political science; Law; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07543096608728098,"score_gpt":0.29392236945557665,"score_spread":0.21849140336829567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590701094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37827423,0.010029832,0.004821869,0.08809832,0.0014895856,0.00005063912,0.00003107152,0.00006496124,0.51713943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629752,0.0019786241,0.0010191725,0.0037057903,0.00012911431,0.000023355859,0.000007124989,0.00005602154,0.030105617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752766,0.0015908771,0.000027755234,0.0001601219,0.00030441053,0.00038926565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975107,0.0016295112,0.00016752986,0.00009634129,0.00030220902,0.00029370404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003853483,0.00043679884,0.00029220016,0.0010878247,0.027335636,0.0052692005,0.0006948053,0.0016359977,0.0032823652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042796326,0.00025302992,0.00013462768,0.0006373853,0.022961982,0.0035050188,0.004106687,0.004934879,0.00030675912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000247076,0.000021970702,0.00073331525,0.000057202255,0.0000035463647,0.00095543975,0.6893017,0.000037673122,0.00071307516,0.28279862,0.014079812,0.011272771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010072521,0.000035454286,0.0017166327,0.00055907696,0.000014571548,0.0005897401,0.40082026,0.00019736798,0.0014702897,0.016340626,0.5782175,0.000028345044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100459486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21640757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100459486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014894828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005887208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19974947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591894600","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v8i2.2121","title":"Fuzzy Frontiers: A Performative Materialization of Intentionality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Performative utterance; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Action (physics); Globalization; Epistemology; Intentionality; Social science; Visual arts; Political science; Art; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11001418825622854,"score_gpt":0.36359173821304297,"score_spread":0.2535775499568144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591894600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52372885,0.0007690349,0.08430257,0.007031147,0.0002565314,0.00019232355,0.00010811986,0.00035014265,0.3832613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846659,0.00009034155,0.005049721,0.00013428487,0.000016195818,0.00005045711,0.000019087267,0.00006754239,0.009906562],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729794,0.0017928494,0.000042641102,0.00023551853,0.00030392708,0.00032718977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696356,0.0018697762,0.00020485096,0.00046593993,0.00017820587,0.000317693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032727055,0.0006041414,0.0002470319,0.0016689571,0.008454065,0.007875503,0.0010018068,0.0012106899,0.0072666253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00482245,0.00025704957,0.00039491447,0.000773589,0.038737882,0.006989851,0.009319376,0.0020395576,0.00039776711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006379308,0.000021508482,0.0013244915,0.00009081899,0.000005551196,0.00055585883,0.5557609,0.00040423748,0.0024228657,0.4228784,0.00181426,0.014657249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025251775,0.000121523204,0.003226726,0.00034532943,0.00001993488,0.00071015506,0.6481845,0.0022788309,0.0030564484,0.15954626,0.18243523,0.00004983204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003385514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059622303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008454065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033454879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025135023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024309218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601733068","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9191.2010.00363.x","title":"TO IMAGINE SPINOZA: DELEUZE AND THE MATERIALITY OF THE SIGN","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Forum","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Sign (mathematics); Citation; Art history; Philosophy; Art; Aesthetics; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.029866300370639885,"score_gpt":0.24721179895047035,"score_spread":0.21734549857983046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601733068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040211827,0.00854708,0.0648356,0.14238346,0.0036409453,0.000096601994,0.000116945164,0.00022569759,0.7399419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93590665,0.0011748265,0.010441816,0.006517385,0.0006224346,0.00010377497,0.00003596306,0.00022165678,0.04497554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463046,0.003677538,0.00015238122,0.0006019987,0.0005453205,0.00039236515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99298346,0.0044652703,0.00030231543,0.0011973479,0.00078396115,0.00026759718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087847,0.0006025559,0.00079220766,0.0019325064,0.010842075,0.014753775,0.0013109872,0.0077621513,0.009650153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019051434,0.0004956812,0.00053654634,0.0011038592,0.0711464,0.02151459,0.0058748024,0.011358795,0.0013041968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051672873,0.0000023468335,0.000028415909,0.000009581049,0.0000013736259,0.000023539224,0.0038098048,0.00002151097,0.00004143466,0.9943975,0.00075443886,0.0009048109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018607321,0.000013334831,0.000065663386,0.000073155126,0.0000070191654,0.000094856936,0.004423517,0.00016061692,0.00016314565,0.93477935,0.060184635,0.000016090185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00509099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005082913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014753775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003840799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004003954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046458483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602075128","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.21401","title":"Dialectics of Humanitarian Immigration and National Identity in Canadian Public Discourse","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Refugee; Immigration; National identity; Identity (music); Negation; Political science; Criminology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.052539224412951446,"score_gpt":0.2769585991238305,"score_spread":0.22441937471087903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602075128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34868628,0.010955521,0.0037769792,0.07721545,0.00058387214,0.000093617535,0.00018711505,0.00012033737,0.55838084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912627,0.0011384232,0.0005469379,0.0013210835,0.000036482925,0.000021888744,0.000026446563,0.000028098224,0.0056179576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358094,0.00239793,0.00016017872,0.0004866726,0.0017028797,0.0016714454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334645,0.0036334454,0.00042071016,0.00022481827,0.0015845473,0.0007900064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007591396,0.0007789358,0.00063415716,0.0052917097,0.044593956,0.021792147,0.0019841394,0.004059688,0.0044385036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010630261,0.0004446467,0.00042006775,0.005778876,0.06246612,0.006410733,0.0073035765,0.004895105,0.0002535958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023916626,0.00001408568,0.0008369661,0.00007749179,0.0000053922213,0.0003206122,0.64658713,0.00010458514,0.0002667576,0.34250826,0.0038677526,0.0053871516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021090984,0.000012346337,0.0033995586,0.0006486625,0.00002816483,0.00020937082,0.76194316,0.0004913742,0.00046037763,0.036763743,0.19595906,0.00006309492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95565504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9424715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18937886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18937886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14096497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94020563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604438113","doi":"","title":"Introduction to President Coaker’s Log of His Trip to the Ice Floe last Spring in s.s. Nascopie","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spring (device); Oceanography; Geology; Meteorology; Aeronautics; Geography; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.032245427123689566,"score_gpt":0.27517287673487556,"score_spread":0.242927449611186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604438113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029752615,0.03504246,0.0017714413,0.35517895,0.19754504,0.00018680454,0.010605213,0.0014051386,0.39528975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008652279,0.009056726,0.00087954296,0.05663747,0.03369321,0.000079661404,0.0029336754,0.00047763262,0.88758975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967027,0.000059631344,0.000019463598,0.000041344443,0.00014465614,0.00006470521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752945,0.0009014083,0.00014501486,0.000067963985,0.00097480445,0.00038134702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062132056,0.0006617369,0.00033668292,0.0013578702,0.0027226964,0.0027256333,0.00065360777,0.0021386193,0.1342397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003110584,0.0002791646,0.0002031589,0.0012999981,0.0005897583,0.0019115792,0.0009982921,0.0024806783,0.049038734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037422312,0.000004131486,0.000033412278,0.000012010583,2.1901545e-7,0.000012199432,0.00003199873,0.0000046563587,0.00002207707,0.00024273145,0.9964132,0.0032197305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014550569,0.0000040485493,0.00054319267,0.000047661615,4.8124105e-7,0.0000235979,0.00012996161,0.000011489353,0.000029549607,0.00014096711,0.9990644,0.0000032611983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048192568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15697296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95180744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001949701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001882151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44907653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1610053666","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2011v36n3a2375","title":"Erasing Race in the Canadian Media: The Case of Suaad Hagi Mohamud","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Race (biology); Mainstream; Somali; Kenya; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Political science; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.12674330201185371,"score_gpt":0.2556227572010151,"score_spread":0.1288794551891614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1610053666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5352837,0.007506225,0.0016067615,0.11793437,0.001075395,0.00011344421,0.00017756688,0.00006770226,0.3362349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96958435,0.002379193,0.00082415045,0.008966183,0.00018441671,0.000029904151,0.000034417302,0.000034949662,0.01796242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468213,0.0012727024,0.00008326729,0.0003700114,0.0017471861,0.0018447505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306184,0.0033404322,0.00056302344,0.0002148055,0.0018168465,0.0010030749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034789613,0.0007890475,0.0005018514,0.00407176,0.08708458,0.011228133,0.002368633,0.008646683,0.0040654144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011600778,0.0005112779,0.00040257405,0.004488069,0.020402368,0.0040034503,0.0051430725,0.0069405898,0.00035467756],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070468865,0.000045629866,0.005594433,0.00014927622,0.000021553797,0.011759129,0.7837208,0.00022485011,0.0013038452,0.15045322,0.02808923,0.018567603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012177777,0.00002179628,0.004545418,0.00041955715,0.0000519851,0.0019277757,0.5788799,0.00038336875,0.0013889988,0.005387488,0.40688014,0.000101442536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9522922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9708737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08708458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065581195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05796856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4758271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1622591963","doi":"10.22329/il.v31i3.3399","title":"“Reasonable Hostility”: Its Usefulness and Limitation as a Norm for Public Hearings","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Explication; Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Corollary; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Management","score_opus":0.2847225877389229,"score_gpt":0.26489730686262597,"score_spread":0.019825280876296925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1622591963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37664384,0.0009984613,0.24404868,0.06126936,0.0006415982,0.0003539108,0.00014001675,0.00039294854,0.3155112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872935,0.000054787673,0.010423223,0.0009286667,0.00008522631,0.0001964411,0.000021629501,0.000040996834,0.0009557359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87400717,0.09906575,0.0061702323,0.004915807,0.0134865735,0.0023545262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75146925,0.16799706,0.02462948,0.032394916,0.01951407,0.003995299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05890464,0.00033825825,0.000656253,0.002825524,0.0069388123,0.011146983,0.001913149,0.004509022,0.002103339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18956025,0.0005068279,0.0005472706,0.0017682784,0.056195963,0.011231421,0.007296095,0.005967359,0.00028380082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004705701,0.00003995886,0.005035899,0.00006830841,0.000010981658,0.00011762768,0.057942156,0.00033710487,0.00046959304,0.9219083,0.0015642626,0.012458705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060013885,0.00020546459,0.01069081,0.00048263278,0.00004061916,0.000539248,0.0831748,0.006199989,0.0017679525,0.82875675,0.06792303,0.00015866477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037317788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027201972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05890464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051218965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051693763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31152117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1637573926","doi":"10.22329/il.v20i2.2270","title":"Tindale's Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1011740871062094,"score_gpt":0.2666673883782389,"score_spread":0.1654933012720295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1637573926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007982789,0.0056147263,0.13569583,0.03131481,0.0016800006,0.00012236451,0.00008248938,0.00012739073,0.8173795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6650393,0.008024941,0.110782616,0.010607117,0.0017410681,0.0008083263,0.00015651697,0.0002537642,0.20258646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463475,0.0037721407,0.0001422614,0.0003171308,0.0009105836,0.00022315384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542624,0.003314755,0.00027762094,0.00036599796,0.00040799894,0.00020744838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004446106,0.0008158626,0.0004991626,0.0026641695,0.004266291,0.010844953,0.0019791357,0.0047086943,0.003828315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008781379,0.00044879832,0.00082253217,0.002050604,0.024863558,0.0129281245,0.003179493,0.0070640864,0.000961473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022147722,0.0000028380746,0.000016021204,0.000012936596,9.270544e-7,0.000027876291,0.0017992342,0.00006880249,0.000028288507,0.99447256,0.0019161517,0.001652149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011769482,0.00001722871,0.00009703482,0.00017008749,0.0000069299485,0.00014677623,0.0019001447,0.001599193,0.00018181956,0.8571857,0.13867171,0.000011598521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002689342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003988827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010844953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042122426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035933312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030562103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654925435","doi":"","title":"At the Edge of Language: Truth, Falsity and Responsibility inTeacher Education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Falsity; Class (philosophy); Principal (computer security); Psychology; Surprise; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.0321078595040932,"score_gpt":0.29959288042035903,"score_spread":0.2674850209162658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1654925435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101505645,0.012902337,0.034557376,0.48550573,0.002988918,0.00007238933,0.000047209196,0.00026334313,0.3621571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96374035,0.0023175755,0.003137238,0.015182596,0.00038606225,0.000049407012,0.000017107497,0.00016683855,0.015002837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94486797,0.040834304,0.0016752448,0.00249957,0.0060642366,0.004058597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311319,0.04795569,0.00469398,0.0051162867,0.0071858717,0.003916319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036600675,0.0005714586,0.000906349,0.002212943,0.021055825,0.02034559,0.0022015027,0.007329839,0.0077041583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061667968,0.00073402456,0.0006046324,0.0015747779,0.1095342,0.025962882,0.018513454,0.014576261,0.0017554589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003263199,0.000046677727,0.0019230202,0.00017258224,0.000012203514,0.001274133,0.3225888,0.00017189072,0.00021762743,0.62724483,0.022229197,0.024086427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019789268,0.000039409515,0.00078015105,0.0011399705,0.0000133506355,0.0010268178,0.24648586,0.00044551658,0.0005678151,0.5780127,0.17141362,0.000054971708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007896238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00841759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036600675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010093174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014768253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19356519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1663408855","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0508","title":"Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience:","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Identity (music); Rhetoric; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.030197498571487784,"score_gpt":0.24827549038768768,"score_spread":0.21807799181619988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1663408855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12959968,0.015872769,0.11839561,0.07281781,0.0012047305,0.00009884684,0.00006544165,0.00013952234,0.66180557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99025565,0.0010124089,0.0035263486,0.0009544856,0.000363393,0.00004521393,0.000012781738,0.000034722536,0.0037950363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597449,0.033460222,0.00074973045,0.0014014131,0.0036619934,0.0009818549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93557376,0.053281255,0.0035384006,0.001962707,0.0041523036,0.0014915398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026640017,0.0006226799,0.0009863507,0.004547739,0.0074642175,0.018432373,0.0016407617,0.007364469,0.005046247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043945488,0.000402238,0.00053820026,0.002582553,0.04459286,0.02220598,0.0081034945,0.005171684,0.00061870366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017735809,0.000011969422,0.00020217268,0.00006967857,0.0000049473133,0.000063638545,0.013251055,0.00012026776,0.00010271166,0.98257494,0.0005959768,0.002984907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026522272,0.000025398107,0.00033209118,0.0004099315,0.000012755318,0.00015144072,0.010022574,0.0012703626,0.0002831685,0.9635942,0.023857716,0.000013922338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006920387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043019463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026640017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005105064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002521802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14088756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1736649079","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i3.3758","title":"Less Ado, More Done: Verbal and Visual Antithesis in the Media.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Antithesis; Argumentative; Opposition (politics); Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05678531341418642,"score_gpt":0.2571573719619091,"score_spread":0.20037205854772266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1736649079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08761114,0.007922,0.037763357,0.03435945,0.0017350836,0.0000545608,0.00012225838,0.00017121484,0.83026093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775587,0.0007730149,0.0042633186,0.0010021345,0.00030033715,0.000044442335,0.00003569653,0.000084663996,0.015937718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957366,0.0029632237,0.00013498058,0.00029749973,0.00066184095,0.0002058069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893903,0.007861453,0.0009031329,0.00086687325,0.0007072589,0.00027091184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035601046,0.00042167556,0.00023381147,0.0022371314,0.0044687977,0.010790735,0.00068784197,0.002377271,0.0051320195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01594356,0.00026797928,0.00030472627,0.0014820294,0.029182918,0.013460131,0.0037199426,0.0031806824,0.00064696214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049421727,0.0000086497,0.00024153083,0.00006043842,0.0000034513394,0.00019592603,0.039461453,0.000049303802,0.0003506006,0.9480041,0.0022699137,0.009305075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056227873,0.000089695466,0.0017141927,0.0006919409,0.00003271686,0.0011133528,0.06210521,0.0011769234,0.0024477055,0.611305,0.31922784,0.000039215178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016344828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018996006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010790735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023880885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011377812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018827915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1800506969","doi":"","title":"This Ecstatic Nation: The American Landscape and the Aesthetics of Patriotism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œjournal of ecocriticism","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03441867449642905,"score_gpt":0.2543024668837229,"score_spread":0.21988379238729383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1800506969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040622234,0.0013799598,0.0023624713,0.041928545,0.00080008496,0.000015634232,0.000014158714,0.000034673325,0.9128423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633509,0.0003711709,0.0004875858,0.004524367,0.0003222314,0.000023672856,0.000007105643,0.000064791384,0.030848214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769324,0.0015613214,0.000027564518,0.00017294544,0.00028646755,0.00025839766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983197,0.0009762273,0.00010618019,0.00020604602,0.00018993637,0.00020190586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025163144,0.00033815202,0.00027555352,0.0011728029,0.015410387,0.00883226,0.0008069105,0.0035403734,0.0070944605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042370115,0.00023006606,0.00023535249,0.001270818,0.04840105,0.005388908,0.0048012873,0.00782096,0.00048409542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008515056,0.000009782327,0.0001655447,0.000014239108,0.0000015639517,0.000066376604,0.03998228,0.00002485759,0.00008194165,0.95211506,0.004974409,0.0025553964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023572631,0.0000416401,0.0012745225,0.00020647225,0.000015817344,0.00032452503,0.12669739,0.0003629236,0.00027498236,0.37613788,0.494614,0.000026147425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060953717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01574214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015410387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027095773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021676754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023733377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1816537332","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2235","title":"Johnstone's View of Rhetorical and Dialectical Argument","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Empiricism; Informal logic; Philosophy; Odds; Sociology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0786768683797336,"score_gpt":0.2799231439869657,"score_spread":0.20124627560723213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1816537332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046359594,0.028965585,0.1339763,0.08913602,0.0033061167,0.00014750024,0.00011283618,0.0001451693,0.73957455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6371276,0.026188495,0.104558006,0.04458013,0.0076088984,0.0016232472,0.00012008507,0.00037981593,0.17781381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98903286,0.0063175033,0.00045587576,0.0010161516,0.0026989493,0.00047865804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898583,0.0074614203,0.000557394,0.0005946361,0.0011239381,0.0004041686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007884935,0.00084631727,0.0009201058,0.0049013104,0.0046510044,0.013371947,0.0017209959,0.0072471653,0.003739687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012501273,0.0005433868,0.00074140803,0.00286227,0.048881095,0.011600127,0.0047775228,0.009175104,0.00156492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041439234,0.0000031741881,0.00001717448,0.000040607214,0.000002579617,0.000020234957,0.0013016883,0.00004388707,0.00003847941,0.99450195,0.0023175788,0.001708385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013103543,0.000013543085,0.000092925526,0.00018248813,0.0000064290975,0.000111821064,0.0005728512,0.000184344,0.00012997635,0.8478948,0.15078542,0.00001228596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036227903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035438957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013371947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067271623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053122686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04880917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1818409472","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020050102.020","title":"Collision of Confucianism, Taoism and Christian Ideas： a Comparative Study of Culture Communication Sense of Pearl S. Buck and Lin Yutang","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taoism; Conscience; Pearl; Philosophy; Ethnolinguistics; Humanities; Ethnology; Buddhism; Theology; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04571202171960924,"score_gpt":0.34134528095392247,"score_spread":0.2956332592343132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1818409472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901168,0.0004024346,0.000072941344,0.00079924235,0.000016424196,0.000007925409,0.000007995434,0.0000013381119,0.0085750185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978471,0.0001931593,0.000029527762,0.000106768275,0.0000034780048,0.000010016821,0.000007718956,0.0000021310636,0.0018001638],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987532,0.00066889374,0.000040608837,0.00012550534,0.00024133352,0.0001704184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.00078818545,0.00021721568,0.00007119847,0.00017217523,0.0001786471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002420131,0.0002814753,0.0003846199,0.0013248837,0.006726668,0.0038242966,0.00045309824,0.0007045856,0.001555481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025399644,0.00019176434,0.00015676889,0.0022521932,0.010232792,0.0019384855,0.0032060351,0.0017416701,0.000075315045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013271264,0.000009856546,0.004314351,0.000020107642,0.0000028967884,0.00019125963,0.9868743,0.000010321379,0.0002881038,0.005241699,0.00022891305,0.0028048994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024406847,0.000021760496,0.017082414,0.000035146008,0.0000032506682,0.000063435065,0.9742089,0.000036612,0.00012854674,0.0006426896,0.0077638477,0.000010920337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040077846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052806452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040077846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005815343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034691982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079689085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1825941721","doi":"10.29173/cjs9838","title":"“Keep it Wild, Keep it Local”: Comparing News Media and the Internet as Sites for Environmental Movement Activism for Jumbo Pass, British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Environmentalism; Environmental movement; Mass media; Wilderness; Democracy; Politics; The Internet; Sociology; Social movement; News media; Social media; New media; Public relations; Public opinion; Media studies; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.07185559189627172,"score_gpt":0.2276911518332942,"score_spread":0.15583555993702247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1825941721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201116,0.0014882794,0.00013241911,0.0035741637,0.000057358662,0.000090532645,0.00016229993,0.000011479218,0.07437184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340194,0.00085344096,0.00016604362,0.0006774628,0.00002447019,0.0000677582,0.00014918573,0.000021210977,0.004638426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595475,0.0018599696,0.00012282548,0.00022864732,0.000991221,0.00084256794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98053384,0.012186588,0.0017638643,0.0003831063,0.0034657125,0.0016669151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004623936,0.0002527324,0.00041633574,0.0045793164,0.010186135,0.012008883,0.0009941695,0.0015603758,0.0062545226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020864349,0.00027294506,0.00019020864,0.006009936,0.0053464198,0.0034447042,0.0034254068,0.0019580529,0.00043998615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009630965,0.00081276696,0.21949257,0.0010960981,0.0001602559,0.0015760055,0.6514268,0.0002523213,0.0015592993,0.017483247,0.015013953,0.090163596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047171212,0.00011380297,0.17699061,0.00072552194,0.00015526329,0.000086772554,0.78286546,0.0003104524,0.00040588132,0.00078579487,0.03747151,0.000041692256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67099315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83838224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32900685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019485341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013362446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66188884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877005884","doi":"","title":"Argument by Anecdote","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anecdote; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Narrative; Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Function (biology); Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Mathematics; Art","score_opus":0.029559253624920637,"score_gpt":0.21312877597005173,"score_spread":0.18356952234513108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877005884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035663754,0.015038117,0.24359095,0.07218332,0.0114849275,0.0011394991,0.0015887169,0.0005483109,0.61876243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68133444,0.019801274,0.16566347,0.011883701,0.004179474,0.0017821396,0.0016195091,0.0003925633,0.11334348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9645573,0.024946507,0.0020229307,0.0016447926,0.0060170265,0.00081147935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90192455,0.07277412,0.0046991766,0.0076047676,0.011472201,0.0015252995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02346143,0.001009035,0.0008669895,0.006832984,0.003964917,0.012560925,0.0018895081,0.004374168,0.012448328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07895038,0.0005047803,0.00054607395,0.004698747,0.009060156,0.015908781,0.007962711,0.005400752,0.0039930255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012317165,0.00005785493,0.0004127994,0.0009984018,0.000026692407,0.0006162812,0.017918171,0.0005321151,0.00078954326,0.88574684,0.03965254,0.053125534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031659445,0.00006216723,0.00031109265,0.0020798803,0.000025674988,0.0005544018,0.010675725,0.0010273252,0.0013980565,0.24625722,0.7375308,0.0000459622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007145059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009888908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02346143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033697546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029293087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12407738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891541739","doi":"","title":"The Function of Criticism. A Response to William Major and Andrew McMurry’s Editorial","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œjournal of ecocriticism","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Function (biology); Philosophy; History; Literature; Environmental ethics; Art; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.027175457857460533,"score_gpt":0.26221924635595956,"score_spread":0.23504378849849902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891541739","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008078875,0.0027513476,0.00008314953,0.8719135,0.12400657,0.000004098368,0.000011762491,0.000015060993,0.0011336907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038999845,0.002504033,0.00024156967,0.7372746,0.2474949,0.000027136783,0.000014249899,0.00007879894,0.008464662],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98497,0.005701082,0.0011681606,0.0017669493,0.00525658,0.0011373254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157992,0.057541125,0.003740476,0.0022141063,0.014662388,0.0060427464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013043286,0.0014095394,0.0016313415,0.0015482582,0.0071295593,0.012934662,0.0045286617,0.034607448,0.007051628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08285854,0.0008382418,0.0012282418,0.0013676527,0.013699331,0.01228491,0.004186136,0.05806367,0.0034699584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008985934,0.000003967985,0.000027317232,0.00005436179,0.0000050913463,0.00007591045,0.00031339814,0.000008526791,0.00003729563,0.0022306354,0.99566454,0.0015700514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011248012,0.0000093028475,0.00014155048,0.00028146835,0.000007799359,0.00018933997,0.00082146336,0.000049201226,0.00009117839,0.0040141167,0.9943644,0.00001896451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035219556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008553821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034607448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042525064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005176777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06898028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900367403","doi":"10.2304/pfie.2003.1.3.4","title":"On Enfraudening the Public Sphere, the Futility of Empire and the Future of Knowledge after ‘America’","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Face (sociological concept); Meaning (existential); Empire; Mythology; Sociology; Public sphere; Administration (probate law); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.021703644043071638,"score_gpt":0.30250750453571246,"score_spread":0.28080386049264083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900367403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030570358,0.02688443,0.027789006,0.20010565,0.0018890086,0.00003264474,0.000045355075,0.000057112025,0.71262646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231367,0.012763302,0.0042996192,0.020128863,0.00196229,0.00006882914,0.00003494224,0.00011641439,0.037489112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597293,0.002495308,0.00006274541,0.00036183512,0.00061678234,0.0004903841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341667,0.0051796157,0.00033623914,0.00041058488,0.0004895665,0.00016734617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006901132,0.00050791923,0.00048597946,0.0022378264,0.009616607,0.013060812,0.0010983397,0.006893303,0.004756254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006186531,0.00020283295,0.00048551505,0.0018894704,0.08744978,0.023186501,0.006749985,0.0075528114,0.0006311902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024724811,0.0000020114474,0.000024931533,0.000012840754,0.0000010205777,0.000025180037,0.009099408,0.000038818453,0.000023930457,0.9884227,0.0010176954,0.0013289914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041595845,0.000010295502,0.00012712152,0.00018312238,0.0000034437758,0.00007369384,0.018320307,0.00013425274,0.00017981508,0.7604062,0.22054635,0.000011247084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073857526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129322335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013060812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067248964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038317132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04879278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906261221","doi":"10.20355/c5v88v","title":"“The Sisterhood is Watching”: Challenging Identity and Agency in Citizenship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Conceptualization; Sociology; Identity (music); Citizenship; Empowerment; Context (archaeology); Collective identity; Gender studies; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Psychology; Politics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06418881742204513,"score_gpt":0.3344653234826654,"score_spread":0.27027650606062026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906261221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5967216,0.0042367396,0.013857833,0.059168834,0.00096899905,0.000063349464,0.00002821978,0.000047975678,0.3249064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934574,0.00035017414,0.00067375804,0.00093948236,0.00011764396,0.000023972545,0.0000056838167,0.000016968499,0.0044150557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322647,0.005654809,0.00006792556,0.0003188543,0.0004000748,0.00033184103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445,0.00433006,0.0003830404,0.00032238092,0.00021622526,0.00029833906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00617603,0.00036413816,0.00037328657,0.0016341031,0.013169837,0.007335837,0.0007990553,0.0030854105,0.0025362617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077398624,0.00024496252,0.00028389637,0.0010760629,0.04049549,0.008932871,0.0058783595,0.0031575055,0.00019332816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019868286,0.000015633259,0.0010716235,0.000045876066,0.0000025875408,0.00040491336,0.733993,0.00003312469,0.0002465498,0.25520757,0.0019384722,0.0070207682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011590982,0.00004756396,0.0018962966,0.00040688485,0.0000100455,0.0005093677,0.78496355,0.0003895154,0.0008364299,0.07086251,0.14004557,0.00002066367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007418191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008929726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013169837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003696202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025105486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032662332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916399285","doi":"10.3138/topia.15.27","title":"Trial by Ordeal: Abu Ghraib and the Global Mediasphere","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trial by ordeal; Meaning (existential); Public sphere; Ideology; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Aesthetics; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041972800565831324,"score_gpt":0.26774153204382706,"score_spread":0.22576873147799573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916399285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25979772,0.023604235,0.002617426,0.17543027,0.0071159466,0.00011983661,0.00012252049,0.00017785345,0.5310142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946125,0.0032392477,0.0008665412,0.011534456,0.0007848188,0.000046345063,0.000037358004,0.00015899508,0.03720743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700636,0.0018360008,0.000055927456,0.00025433354,0.00041210273,0.0004352365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963948,0.0019700075,0.0003245327,0.00039749578,0.00049186416,0.0004213779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004544241,0.00070433045,0.00037628185,0.001489621,0.020351557,0.015927177,0.0011061656,0.0038433983,0.010730768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006479567,0.0003342413,0.00024767997,0.0020462507,0.029467262,0.009893686,0.0060210098,0.0056660115,0.0011916142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000227855,0.000083072206,0.00312548,0.0003878738,0.00002429474,0.0026173054,0.63779384,0.000094998184,0.0012106402,0.25433493,0.055277124,0.04482273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032782627,0.000058343674,0.0021201603,0.0005545966,0.000025618134,0.0009351517,0.51749915,0.000094690826,0.0010814812,0.015650595,0.46190616,0.00004128011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03782829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06701457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03782829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068646846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042029107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075216234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916995948","doi":"","title":"Plenary| If Everything is Mediated, What is Distinctive About the Field of Communication?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Transformative learning; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Media studies; Social media; Law; Political science; Public relations; Epistemology","score_opus":0.34934718048838354,"score_gpt":0.5142859733116676,"score_spread":0.16493879282328405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916995948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038475404,0.011591749,0.0006490495,0.534355,0.34560096,0.00026622275,0.00072787574,0.0002695291,0.10615498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011717254,0.0067102886,0.00025503748,0.29613218,0.2300809,0.0007021747,0.0005571046,0.00057744054,0.45326754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977773,0.0006075632,0.00013830507,0.00053818466,0.00062235835,0.00031629918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643195,0.0011245761,0.00018663632,0.00015227162,0.0012855702,0.0008189404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023270152,0.0013099831,0.0011838496,0.00086723117,0.005308903,0.009462511,0.0018837774,0.008956059,0.14419171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109570045,0.00045450416,0.0010019586,0.00065631716,0.002595702,0.0057405466,0.0037904868,0.019622589,0.11002252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029765753,0.000013076969,0.00003108641,0.00006063914,0.0000021983133,0.000048781927,0.000116689436,0.000008967104,0.0000794004,0.004172575,0.99130577,0.0041311984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114513905,0.000018549405,0.00019741664,0.00014696637,0.000002644494,0.000049881193,0.00023855269,0.000031266576,0.000052324474,0.0016703337,0.9975732,0.0000073730557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036451658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00306337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14419171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043480056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023026252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4823693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917912646","doi":"10.22329/il.v21i1.2234","title":"Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialogic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Product (mathematics); Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05739613039954247,"score_gpt":0.30512835920797426,"score_spread":0.2477322288084318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917912646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048950436,0.10873026,0.05961089,0.5770351,0.011888301,0.0000801085,0.00016780902,0.00014391844,0.23744851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3789941,0.14718586,0.09990145,0.13577628,0.033506285,0.0005782792,0.00016615874,0.0003806975,0.2035109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929028,0.0027132363,0.00035469627,0.0010694778,0.0026124907,0.00034722962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98081106,0.015179844,0.0006501787,0.0010360499,0.001435164,0.0008877123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006977289,0.00057703373,0.0009393838,0.0021902723,0.0035730053,0.011251672,0.0017172333,0.005517434,0.003844722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018241242,0.00044733676,0.00058785273,0.0019015255,0.026733536,0.015856965,0.003287822,0.011566106,0.0022539394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018048526,0.000015174718,0.00010350406,0.00016218536,0.0000083115865,0.00006671783,0.002319908,0.00011963133,0.00011380507,0.9408429,0.04290653,0.0133232605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011636187,0.000010589364,0.00020238356,0.00026047262,0.000008336805,0.00015229348,0.00054898043,0.00020989399,0.000192914,0.6845925,0.31377944,0.000030588264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036649534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050126784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011251672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003558084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040467437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036899865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1929403418","doi":"","title":"Social Media and the \"Perpetual Project\" of Ethos Construction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Young scholars in writing","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Politics; Social media; Sociology; Key (lock); Political science; Law; Literature; Computer science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052592087410256005,"score_gpt":0.28236500988537283,"score_spread":0.22977292247511683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1929403418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12714732,0.007922977,0.2403696,0.04441799,0.0015117634,0.0002176228,0.00008465804,0.00027480183,0.5780533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756125,0.001112363,0.013759166,0.0006818714,0.0004537804,0.00016747274,0.00003377448,0.00012152186,0.00805758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98256266,0.013478994,0.0005399262,0.0012085995,0.0017270653,0.00048266567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96886617,0.02333237,0.0017443538,0.003968049,0.0013136665,0.0007753763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023480933,0.000652319,0.000575543,0.00519238,0.0074730366,0.01211211,0.0018400564,0.0027357512,0.0038891677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02130083,0.00049181184,0.00042656352,0.0020767287,0.086323105,0.021459159,0.009880266,0.0032918483,0.00046795234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058880128,0.000005110455,0.00014537222,0.000040007224,0.0000023135324,0.000047344172,0.018431773,0.00008662246,0.000089197776,0.9762047,0.00030440494,0.004637166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014209431,0.000024577255,0.00029604428,0.0002539359,0.0000049755276,0.00017124024,0.014815454,0.00057755515,0.00040831594,0.91704834,0.06636737,0.000018019076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000494844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004891957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023480933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003426815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032303603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124180555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930852263","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2007v32n1a1779","title":"Newsworld, Riel, and the Métis: Recognition and the Limits to Reconciliation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Rhetorical question; Character (mathematics); Identity (music); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Aesthetics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.08234533563369603,"score_gpt":0.25207909705591436,"score_spread":0.16973376142221833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930852263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08420516,0.009098558,0.016031468,0.16357419,0.0025778187,0.000062163206,0.000029805846,0.00013132145,0.7242895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975222,0.00083503133,0.0014239571,0.0054230816,0.00074669067,0.00005966206,0.000013457925,0.0001013901,0.01617469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97768825,0.01570881,0.00042918086,0.0013212642,0.0035765106,0.0012760094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98015594,0.0151427705,0.001152328,0.0013675239,0.0016074245,0.00057395553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015109179,0.00051950465,0.00069349306,0.0026022298,0.017432583,0.018615898,0.0017794399,0.0077660275,0.0038973892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031239685,0.000457268,0.00034285846,0.0016412484,0.06715899,0.015979474,0.010838143,0.012180493,0.0007240608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004069029,0.00001201388,0.00017653391,0.0000719946,0.000004834103,0.00025044344,0.12030471,0.00006870257,0.00023445922,0.86341715,0.0067125317,0.008705911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054018587,0.00007716663,0.0006009769,0.0006752182,0.000027332868,0.00046706476,0.18177187,0.00071878894,0.0016215122,0.2549148,0.5590117,0.000059612805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009461872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008395163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009610741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004710987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07990593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930940957","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2006v31n1a1557","title":"Anti-intellectualism in American Media: Magazines and Higher Education","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectualism; State (computer science); Political science; George (robot); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.02799074890614132,"score_gpt":0.23352216845258117,"score_spread":0.20553141954643986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930940957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022193665,0.19989413,0.0009034418,0.16046104,0.010272279,0.000016395656,0.00003949049,0.000037874917,0.6061817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6219651,0.19968344,0.0010182351,0.05075025,0.034306645,0.000052395582,0.00007640727,0.000094754076,0.09205271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982844,0.0007059213,0.000045618468,0.00006924164,0.000727634,0.00016721956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919436,0.005846394,0.0007474515,0.00013067081,0.0009367322,0.0003951172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016545517,0.0003801981,0.00026494698,0.0030404069,0.0049799276,0.009792629,0.0004645709,0.0025961143,0.005779482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007434032,0.00014924521,0.0001445074,0.0036834143,0.008631858,0.006908371,0.0019863965,0.002589464,0.0009052275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042807525,0.000116627445,0.0016956631,0.0005473801,0.000011157505,0.0001903209,0.040669765,0.00005983421,0.00037553243,0.6661013,0.18902203,0.10116748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007617072,0.000025018424,0.0037789142,0.0008145242,0.000008224354,0.00023274044,0.015385847,0.000046106587,0.00024819665,0.036821235,0.9426183,0.000013228467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004208194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009207182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009792629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002278396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022842893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019334257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1949656769","doi":"","title":"Common Ground, Argument Form and Analogical Reductio ad Absurdum","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reductio ad absurdum; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Common ground; Inference; Philosophy; License; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.048543139520856406,"score_gpt":0.2409642809586081,"score_spread":0.1924211414377517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1949656769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1388285,0.004821368,0.29355595,0.021433264,0.0011195,0.00036493654,0.00018440493,0.00041913267,0.53927296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687873,0.0006152535,0.022168845,0.00059533096,0.00033545477,0.0001390463,0.00006262612,0.000078635596,0.00721744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97908473,0.012089637,0.0011450223,0.0022395414,0.00459638,0.00084468914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96091473,0.028817117,0.0029051679,0.0047282106,0.0018962084,0.0007384251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013865976,0.0009484075,0.0010676775,0.0041817077,0.0031730325,0.008786797,0.0019249703,0.0036922514,0.009052359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03972346,0.0007802054,0.0014526007,0.0021684575,0.026208607,0.020417897,0.0082704555,0.005681552,0.00092952355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026165644,0.000023095417,0.00016202916,0.00007134122,0.00001172707,0.00006119738,0.001327044,0.0002242507,0.00014312692,0.9918115,0.0003741551,0.0057643065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022690841,0.00002550981,0.00020376605,0.00004991521,0.0000149979305,0.00013514998,0.0005337413,0.00084216945,0.0002785821,0.9923268,0.0055568903,0.000009767152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089599716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069478503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013865976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027818494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013978858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07333118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953580245","doi":"10.1007/s10978-015-9168-6","title":"Hearing Voice: A Theoretical Framework for Truth Commission Testimony","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Philosophy of law; Law; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.08947084020002825,"score_gpt":0.33542479035158834,"score_spread":0.24595395015156007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953580245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017257141,0.0030431445,0.4277667,0.049373753,0.00088672363,0.00028355018,0.00021377031,0.0002032544,0.500972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132878,0.00083256484,0.0628102,0.003031374,0.0008142971,0.00059176836,0.00010007589,0.00016729122,0.018364627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864081,0.009709336,0.00041180564,0.0009515073,0.0015135253,0.0010057264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97650844,0.01870332,0.0010214972,0.0015639546,0.0016095117,0.000593308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013340598,0.000909234,0.0008394767,0.0048112664,0.008949451,0.01864809,0.0044562803,0.011891226,0.011750912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030457933,0.00081260933,0.0013296537,0.0037767391,0.043676976,0.017926889,0.004888253,0.006803075,0.0015794527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020543139,0.0000031875604,0.000023987022,0.000010652107,0.0000012022633,0.000016817932,0.0017345445,0.00008951426,0.000015706983,0.99681515,0.00040887322,0.00087827153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123723585,0.000007727538,0.00004879378,0.000060773964,0.000006577393,0.00004683019,0.0017166855,0.0011797139,0.000085868094,0.98704916,0.009776722,0.000008793822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064962595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047946097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01864809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008253035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007375147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07055265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957305483","doi":"","title":"Searching for Authority","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.2141388202798353,"score_gpt":0.33883515715009904,"score_spread":0.12469633687026374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957305483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075612046,0.0033564207,0.02705467,0.02001289,0.00045667327,0.00007942302,0.00025066792,0.00016596839,0.87301135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174883,0.001256187,0.012608042,0.0010711071,0.00022039852,0.000057953832,0.000364903,0.00013851491,0.06679457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442405,0.002700755,0.00027604794,0.00093101204,0.0012294957,0.00043859638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858402,0.008942187,0.0009263093,0.0022987325,0.0014324551,0.0005601465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046904585,0.000428096,0.00082968525,0.0055160187,0.0074389977,0.011373198,0.0015603512,0.0032471267,0.04932035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026981723,0.0005252743,0.00070915895,0.0044446243,0.012088005,0.018485438,0.0050605647,0.0027465576,0.0062472923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044233115,0.000023507046,0.0015304965,0.00009864732,0.0000113078295,0.00022853327,0.01217982,0.00013769044,0.00036102,0.9412465,0.00768524,0.036452852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002690754,0.0000382434,0.0015900861,0.0003086236,0.0000398278,0.00054699153,0.025922354,0.0015174018,0.0010584461,0.7989576,0.16996156,0.00003196898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025304588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032272772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04932035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032153777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038122353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16499305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958664867","doi":"","title":"Teaching Freshmen to Reason—And Live—Through Aristotle's Modes of Persuasion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Theme (computing); Pathos; Reading (process); Ethos; Psychology; Composition (language); Sociology; Pedagogy; Literature; Epistemology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05400593354315988,"score_gpt":0.24518603862386668,"score_spread":0.1911801050807068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958664867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053110093,0.0039890315,0.113686204,0.0345823,0.0006934436,0.00012919151,0.000038705257,0.0002378086,0.7935332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8079473,0.0029505675,0.06033456,0.002657227,0.00031001386,0.00012620635,0.0000370482,0.00011350716,0.12552366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983864,0.0009072534,0.0000436722,0.0001386832,0.00036168584,0.00016234332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846894,0.001014246,0.00009581004,0.00013514255,0.0001494862,0.0001363837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031900455,0.00043316506,0.00025338432,0.0011571391,0.0046447506,0.006543731,0.0006061725,0.0017378813,0.004474572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040417174,0.00022818403,0.0002940561,0.0004332208,0.018437525,0.005724202,0.0026137189,0.0039711664,0.0013497183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010126768,0.000023147068,0.0003131044,0.000038553455,0.0000021504106,0.00005884887,0.032321844,0.00020989525,0.00021238462,0.9401397,0.0044364072,0.022233803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015084357,0.000044253862,0.00062231853,0.00016369238,0.0000040071086,0.00016022653,0.010988248,0.0005223854,0.0007734213,0.665816,0.3208766,0.000013641468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019412745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004279582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006543731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027038583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022787005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019617975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967853986","doi":"10.4018/jte.2012070105","title":"Systems of Ethical Reasoning and Media Communications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technoethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Psychology; Cognitive science; Engineering","score_opus":0.12152856382135316,"score_gpt":0.3529401161317145,"score_spread":0.23141155231036134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967853986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015841462,0.0029427712,0.2364906,0.13821167,0.0015135899,0.00014140428,0.00040387848,0.0005527028,0.60390186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8650392,0.001431333,0.06688336,0.0075640073,0.0017550872,0.00035888396,0.00040415497,0.00033482496,0.056229133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880167,0.009224604,0.00039114244,0.0006492749,0.0012125807,0.00050563796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94404155,0.047451008,0.0016434811,0.0032798338,0.0029402932,0.00064375054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010912009,0.00054777,0.0006868198,0.0032698805,0.005305467,0.018299248,0.0017506233,0.008849773,0.03165998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044589005,0.000718614,0.001281884,0.002669905,0.0224938,0.019353036,0.003981181,0.004139783,0.0038607642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004386835,0.0000054122465,0.000083652616,0.000013741118,0.0000044431704,0.000029953057,0.0005140546,0.00035839117,0.000022350667,0.9925209,0.0036971695,0.002745574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056733916,0.0000026039338,0.00006474556,0.000029995386,0.0000027557764,0.000035958165,0.00030067432,0.002246356,0.00007233678,0.98492277,0.01231151,0.0000045807415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005733692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037938068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03165998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058781197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00402214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10591322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968347954","doi":"10.1177/000842980503400205","title":"The secular masks of religion: A (re) constructive critique of W. D. Hart's Edward Said and the Religious Effects of Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Secularism; Constructive; Orientalism; Sociology; Reading (process); Philosophy of religion; Epistemology; Religious studies; Focus (optics); Philosophy; Islam; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024188557411424883,"score_gpt":0.3142134508550491,"score_spread":0.2900248934436242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968347954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02542093,0.08505437,0.004671199,0.76896715,0.007918909,0.000016889047,0.000054686916,0.000034436736,0.10786145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83475757,0.042531643,0.0025691737,0.06968212,0.008676231,0.00005272914,0.000026010379,0.000105733954,0.04159885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957883,0.0027869553,0.00008499283,0.00020016766,0.00089893903,0.00024058727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861055,0.012068784,0.0004880139,0.0002249921,0.000836469,0.00027623426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036703951,0.0004663399,0.0004947579,0.0014259259,0.006032158,0.0062935543,0.0012125277,0.0034927442,0.0013772984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075508994,0.00024752322,0.00025976184,0.0012087425,0.028215442,0.006014159,0.0025961834,0.0075335526,0.00029353204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027277198,0.000017304017,0.00017552235,0.00016076036,0.000006737108,0.00015699997,0.041569155,0.00014226357,0.00013029901,0.8731252,0.07165199,0.0128365485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020469764,0.000032333013,0.0005736583,0.0006525173,0.0000145050235,0.00023116611,0.033492945,0.00034414098,0.00040520608,0.25312495,0.7110786,0.000029562942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013194233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019029386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013194233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063324044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040443325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04594499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970539877","doi":"10.1177/1359183511424838","title":"Sea-lion whiskers and spray-crete: the affect of Indigenous status in contemporary British Columbia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Material Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Affect (linguistics); History; Ethnology; Sociology; Anthropology; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05447758528222711,"score_gpt":0.23468546277631824,"score_spread":0.18020787749409112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970539877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639261,0.0003797581,0.000043167893,0.0028039045,0.000038941296,0.0000087191775,0.000039277198,0.000007086194,0.03275307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905877,0.00024374573,0.00003018322,0.00029385203,0.000006160539,0.000005380348,0.00001584857,0.000008450474,0.008808573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992455,0.00019508453,0.000017397233,0.000060369166,0.00021069843,0.00027096015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979773,0.00064056704,0.00019585897,0.000045346827,0.00071431155,0.00042664842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096076925,0.00020057705,0.00024002715,0.0014533686,0.018227702,0.0050691864,0.00081521564,0.0010766371,0.0062497286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003766591,0.00019745763,0.00007871768,0.0017076747,0.008049479,0.001056394,0.0026345064,0.0025588935,0.00031809718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076186036,0.00004572328,0.023243105,0.000057011046,0.000008879736,0.00092336227,0.95385,0.00004810059,0.0014569878,0.0039100586,0.0048114154,0.01156914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029808855,0.000012004563,0.036930695,0.00005470135,0.0000070870306,0.000075932985,0.9402425,0.000036718902,0.00015394222,0.0002071365,0.022253707,0.000022642083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039700508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024619434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012994546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17862731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975214013","doi":"10.1080/1461670x.2015.1006908","title":"Political Conflict Photographs and Their Keyword Texts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journalism Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Meaning (existential); Reading (process); Indigenous; Mohawk; Staring; Sociology; Media studies; History; Linguistics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.21475259133392027,"score_gpt":0.33548261227288084,"score_spread":0.12073002093896057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975214013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37333736,0.003602288,0.00873613,0.005275023,0.001428151,0.00015799404,0.0012818105,0.00025399934,0.6059273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97484213,0.001058132,0.004544897,0.00042672353,0.00030164814,0.00007952096,0.00039841616,0.00025284293,0.018095704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882454,0.0006120391,0.00003804104,0.000103935614,0.00033121454,0.00009018756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943915,0.0036564018,0.00065823115,0.00029032162,0.00085646915,0.00014712867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008873931,0.0003271034,0.00015641592,0.0019757159,0.0020807805,0.0041571204,0.00041034244,0.000684825,0.01318784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008949708,0.00019478583,0.00009672511,0.0021047876,0.0032748622,0.0029002635,0.0011895399,0.0012812755,0.0010261509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008974273,0.00007021767,0.007250112,0.0019382294,0.000020796326,0.0020671273,0.60270256,0.0005788452,0.021148924,0.20901331,0.036140904,0.11817159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003663226,0.00014282422,0.030774727,0.0012236336,0.00004624317,0.0013939681,0.28836152,0.0006601134,0.008744423,0.009298342,0.6592375,0.00007995783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00806341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013862442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01318784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024275226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007065709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04411769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976899658","doi":"10.1080/02722010902834185","title":"So Close Yet So Far Away: American Academics on the Similarities and Differences Between the United States and Canada Following the International Canadian Studies Institute","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Canadian studies; Narrative; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Medical education; Gender studies; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.09659740990476653,"score_gpt":0.3112189603478513,"score_spread":0.21462155044308476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976899658","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13503902,0.57111275,0.00025759928,0.13118114,0.0023594147,0.00003183532,0.00033553413,0.00002633453,0.15965644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77909136,0.19886985,0.0002533456,0.0140507165,0.00033705274,0.000022841261,0.00014720792,0.000039231847,0.0071884287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993131,0.001925878,0.0001702791,0.00044278635,0.002713746,0.0016163508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827036,0.005126672,0.0011016248,0.00029652554,0.008545317,0.0022261476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009458945,0.00038129935,0.0007310312,0.008772891,0.022647705,0.016117975,0.0015933758,0.002031743,0.0025645993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01546369,0.00031912175,0.00022205296,0.028915746,0.018680556,0.0036536478,0.004024882,0.0028371706,0.00023604328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010321123,0.000036821177,0.014130809,0.0014922714,0.00007523326,0.0007464221,0.5767049,0.0001304462,0.00030900553,0.12737991,0.14557943,0.13331151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008237763,0.000013018561,0.034413267,0.0033806795,0.00006465496,0.00017212884,0.54660285,0.00002820951,0.00015622714,0.0035569072,0.41154444,0.000059382583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08331712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08331712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19184649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6045109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979702281","doi":"10.1023/b:jomh.0000007447.19765.ee","title":"Ultrasound: A Window to the Womb?: Obstetric Ultrasound and the Abortion Rights Debate","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Humanities","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Ultrasound; Abortion; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Obstetrics; Medicine; Psychology; Pregnancy; Radiology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03230042324028682,"score_gpt":0.25362468817953737,"score_spread":0.22132426493925056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979702281","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006598214,0.04562358,0.0012522882,0.88852435,0.0025993069,0.000009265762,0.00001980209,0.000014387256,0.055358853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61345875,0.031323224,0.0013586617,0.3087162,0.024358066,0.00011081847,0.000026691314,0.000112047164,0.020535488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784385,0.017251031,0.00038793284,0.0008879769,0.0018885387,0.0011461045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042162,0.08955564,0.0020141029,0.0010418087,0.0016206475,0.0015516683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027248986,0.0006638489,0.001240194,0.002430656,0.012334176,0.016423523,0.002562802,0.038992327,0.011181262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069735326,0.0006888138,0.00055459305,0.0023374688,0.068601206,0.020170169,0.008795224,0.025310222,0.00096116617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005372183,0.00002260155,0.0001356678,0.00012375946,0.0000058217224,0.00015824985,0.015955051,0.000048235728,0.00010503608,0.94806284,0.025123535,0.010205513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008593245,0.000048558784,0.00060141267,0.0020436516,0.000033655357,0.0003447416,0.025157765,0.00029767596,0.00026113848,0.712342,0.25872493,0.000058500278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009795853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007841641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98766583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069954637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008216304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14410818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980496868","doi":"10.1075/ssol.1.1.19kui","title":"The symptoms of science in studies of literature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Study of Literature","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Epistemology; Externalism; Interpretation (philosophy); Articulation (sociology); Philosophy of science; Praxis; Nature versus nurture; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08601650450688414,"score_gpt":0.2995817241021938,"score_spread":0.21356521959530966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980496868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14548478,0.062368594,0.034516394,0.37121686,0.004007935,0.0002963582,0.00037935152,0.00025595224,0.3814737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97127616,0.007823585,0.004369723,0.008827811,0.0014868034,0.00038321203,0.00008747042,0.00011169205,0.0056336364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565237,0.031679954,0.0018280388,0.0022239657,0.006608134,0.0011361372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9375244,0.043008465,0.008347859,0.004721362,0.004616969,0.0017809849],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024375321,0.0008776292,0.0013283836,0.007955813,0.010548429,0.015721297,0.0017874977,0.0052858926,0.0042042956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06280313,0.0006309048,0.00062747294,0.009170862,0.116902,0.021852527,0.017763468,0.006925836,0.0006200041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032887903,0.000014901684,0.0013899193,0.00042868906,0.000010893138,0.00018332382,0.13867694,0.00008667569,0.0002079936,0.8461806,0.0054166396,0.0073705018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051110575,0.000036955713,0.0016325573,0.0006697753,0.000013394879,0.0003635457,0.067204386,0.0002447071,0.00016564061,0.7970736,0.13251302,0.000031287454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002527892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020144342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009200689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008436782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12891054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981603524","doi":"10.1086/647488","title":": <i>The Rhetoric of the Conscience in Donne, Herbert and Vaughan</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Conscience; Rhetoric; Media studies; Sociology; History; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Theology; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01588285534260754,"score_gpt":0.2250654043391257,"score_spread":0.20918254899651817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981603524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063701114,0.09365431,0.0016797346,0.6770849,0.008854109,0.000017608556,0.00011302502,0.00003457116,0.21219166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5843077,0.06016276,0.0023202107,0.1889468,0.011392386,0.0001362291,0.00017559905,0.00025216115,0.15230621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755377,0.0016325815,0.00007288047,0.00015200058,0.0004640628,0.00012476213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954,0.00338307,0.00025124062,0.00015817917,0.0005951702,0.00021233958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031123753,0.0005391607,0.00036393874,0.00155304,0.007134597,0.008546779,0.0010484123,0.0055494853,0.0062419213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011986455,0.00024621875,0.00029634844,0.002229377,0.013639202,0.0126258945,0.0025352307,0.006179399,0.0013584056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026514343,0.000013388898,0.00030067805,0.00013249714,0.000005453665,0.00008176594,0.024535025,0.000035388297,0.000056632314,0.5810485,0.38576987,0.007994332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000157461,0.000009500855,0.0013477721,0.0009457987,0.000010073257,0.00024568383,0.025931865,0.00007269073,0.00022846046,0.13572907,0.83544385,0.000019572115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02023978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037700016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02023978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005816142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043895408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042199314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981815515","doi":"10.1177/000842980703600101","title":"Of myth and mantra: The slippery taxonomy of printed and oral Vrat Kathas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mantra; Mythology; Hinduism; Narrative; Aesthetics; Presentation (obstetrics); Literature; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.1581644652718314,"score_gpt":0.34702826041520546,"score_spread":0.18886379514337406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981815515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5479962,0.0056082197,0.027168825,0.0069137444,0.00043851126,0.000147371,0.00016953582,0.00016937988,0.41138816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835851,0.0007063378,0.005286778,0.00041641627,0.00010616929,0.00007959072,0.000103388935,0.00005156731,0.009664662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971615,0.0018696348,0.00012752962,0.00017531763,0.00046310236,0.00020292641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746466,0.0013879011,0.0003340471,0.00032267772,0.00024816886,0.0002426245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015706066,0.00047558112,0.00035303042,0.0033548705,0.0034007456,0.008133556,0.00078408513,0.0013845356,0.0033195082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004526779,0.00022361755,0.0002958973,0.0015808232,0.01733165,0.00643946,0.0042965454,0.0024914106,0.00043690088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000599877,0.000040023355,0.0059784697,0.0002878299,0.000010735834,0.00049410725,0.40525723,0.00016120523,0.0019321471,0.53495204,0.0017445534,0.049081657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022067657,0.00029149305,0.02542089,0.0010868766,0.000041305582,0.003901397,0.55145043,0.0019934436,0.002073296,0.16595282,0.24769346,0.0000725623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018505828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025913294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008133556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017184771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001308941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012468457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986262524","doi":"10.5250/0095182x.35.1.104","title":"From the Tomahawk Chop to the Road Block: Discourses of Savagism in Whitestream Media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Indian Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Mainstream; Colonialism; Indigenous; Newspaper; Shit; Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law; History; Art history","score_opus":0.03502305212689452,"score_gpt":0.24632469952294764,"score_spread":0.21130164739605312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986262524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48203254,0.008680305,0.001703149,0.059534647,0.0009884026,0.00004772192,0.000060292736,0.000054604556,0.4468983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842084,0.00095530157,0.00018533341,0.0023311998,0.00015904331,0.000018772587,0.000013853633,0.000047774553,0.012080146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994194,0.0036101183,0.00008808455,0.0003109015,0.00089243427,0.0009045174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938764,0.0036103555,0.0004636485,0.00021357638,0.00089289946,0.0009431523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052791224,0.00081263256,0.00047604443,0.0032483402,0.044623207,0.01666422,0.0014079772,0.0044816104,0.0051084436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007612527,0.00048383986,0.0003285041,0.0027286238,0.0469659,0.010131201,0.009373217,0.005821993,0.00049449387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024206323,0.000012750873,0.00048721393,0.00003567647,0.000004086633,0.0003564396,0.94225204,0.000013502432,0.000250389,0.050703093,0.0036473607,0.0022132935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008737435,0.000014987479,0.0010612836,0.00023790223,0.000007832605,0.00013157706,0.9021781,0.00006124045,0.00022864022,0.00781583,0.08823307,0.000020801408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18246794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27423695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18246794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015956284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081660105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36281168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986558073","doi":"10.4000/communication.1676","title":"L’évolution des pratiques rhétoriques de délibération publique par la controverse","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.07625055781539038,"score_gpt":0.2787157605488521,"score_spread":0.20246520273346175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986558073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3336186,0.010536653,0.034043692,0.20860837,0.0015534984,0.0002541881,0.00024695857,0.00022723214,0.4109108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564063,0.0015327793,0.003195484,0.003748483,0.00018297644,0.00008615379,0.000031376923,0.00009967192,0.034716673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97554636,0.01549861,0.00039478848,0.0013638004,0.005426453,0.0017700332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9267609,0.054449536,0.0038564997,0.0022712764,0.010776804,0.0018849613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027444664,0.00055580353,0.00050851365,0.003263276,0.021826306,0.013932586,0.001903424,0.005175233,0.008445336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04230154,0.00052305055,0.00039102227,0.0038831867,0.033553977,0.0056879967,0.0054032216,0.0071424437,0.00067837856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007632495,0.000034351404,0.0035638167,0.00036273996,0.000026577132,0.0006049014,0.5444742,0.0003817309,0.0018581204,0.40538588,0.009018787,0.034212567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004147591,0.0000729961,0.011248708,0.0009518076,0.000050107323,0.00033565224,0.28256044,0.0011396178,0.0025717,0.039017394,0.6618876,0.00012247126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3868083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51235014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3868083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050710786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044636786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76911366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986913681","doi":"10.1353/gsp.2011.0089","title":"What's in a Name?: Reflections on Using, Not Using, and Overusing the \"G-Word\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genocide Studies and Prevention","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Genocide; Word (group theory); History; Linguistics; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.27273275830250043,"score_gpt":0.4165554917236307,"score_spread":0.14382273342113028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986913681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014774454,0.018756997,0.0015187158,0.89384735,0.006930289,0.000022993096,0.000043091302,0.000051826715,0.06405434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28556135,0.010609566,0.0015120484,0.64031893,0.0036049688,0.0000807184,0.000040834995,0.0005855598,0.057685994],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699873,0.021950845,0.00049861637,0.0016808846,0.0032856155,0.002596704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797626,0.014186327,0.0010350836,0.00052078324,0.0022193422,0.0022757892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020719275,0.0010784226,0.0008650775,0.0016944209,0.037791017,0.018939706,0.003827795,0.020603234,0.0044393945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026796876,0.000797192,0.00053322327,0.001943272,0.083969764,0.031232243,0.009429674,0.03428639,0.0018019326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000368601,0.000033818083,0.0005641706,0.00010036196,0.0000069067582,0.000695641,0.50213903,0.000030897078,0.00024525909,0.21565723,0.26911792,0.011371902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013038708,0.00002603563,0.00039160394,0.0004117505,0.0000049216837,0.00037647705,0.25692979,0.00007528812,0.0002119626,0.02048457,0.7210146,0.000059983202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09253028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14418265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09253028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014693634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011764369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18398339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988263416","doi":"10.1162/posc.2009.17.3.346","title":"Alan Gross and the Rhetoric of Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Science","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Notice; Sketch; Order (exchange); Art history; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Mathematics; Law; Linguistics; Economics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03346461631450931,"score_gpt":0.2919688617798382,"score_spread":0.2585042454653289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988263416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012278734,0.17306007,0.008939692,0.32057935,0.0031080795,0.000023087507,0.00006148934,0.00012887854,0.48182058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76711696,0.11893756,0.010553914,0.03629399,0.005289821,0.00008913523,0.00006532222,0.000118930366,0.06153441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982514,0.001190254,0.000028784363,0.0001149197,0.00029933045,0.00011532461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649554,0.0028615138,0.00021099368,0.000108834196,0.00019891142,0.00012429789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020367187,0.0004236636,0.0003466906,0.0023790672,0.00319901,0.0036532604,0.0005017074,0.002769572,0.0026721049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050398973,0.00017807815,0.00019768557,0.0018845729,0.017020129,0.00534017,0.0017213868,0.002628742,0.001087649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014613106,0.000004285205,0.00007412525,0.00005758128,0.0000026627092,0.000046468354,0.0017413034,0.00025203507,0.00005630527,0.96142465,0.02467468,0.011651435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008223407,0.000014622164,0.00020162226,0.00022065097,0.0000040455398,0.00010532347,0.0012102447,0.00015692748,0.00011761924,0.6801733,0.31777558,0.000011835011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027499096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033952699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028035494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020423264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020341277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990912593","doi":"10.1111/1542-734x.00006","title":"Phenomenological Realities or “Quinntown,” Life in a Cyber Community","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of American & Comparative Cultures","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.29001222481250566,"score_gpt":0.3613425586137734,"score_spread":0.07133033380126774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990912593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35768843,0.0066433703,0.04014986,0.09634651,0.0022746536,0.00025473235,0.00041781002,0.0002577284,0.49596685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498756,0.0005989662,0.0013667236,0.002415219,0.00015006505,0.00006452611,0.000057834935,0.000063456944,0.01029568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961479,0.0030162926,0.00008604668,0.00025387888,0.0002844792,0.00021139893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942058,0.003496703,0.0005106078,0.0009680258,0.00033472202,0.00048421536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038144307,0.0004585701,0.00029149177,0.001865221,0.01136405,0.009595168,0.0012161493,0.002853915,0.00635442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012758076,0.00034118068,0.00034888202,0.0018413985,0.054534502,0.018667448,0.0057711503,0.0044656466,0.00040828515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032976866,0.000023928915,0.0010141237,0.00008448907,0.00000634041,0.0003724368,0.56427675,0.0000689673,0.00043417627,0.42439723,0.0052992967,0.003989218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009155287,0.000022844812,0.00082508737,0.0001914388,0.000006526225,0.00062805327,0.7754319,0.00018943433,0.00031563535,0.10086208,0.12149237,0.000025519596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030564405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004963618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027043382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020930804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021257639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991023345","doi":"10.1080/15358590802074746","title":"A Smorgasbord of Current Rhetorical Scholarship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rhetorical question; Current (fluid); Sociology; Political science; Rhetoric; Linguistics; Philosophy; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.16058046559507735,"score_gpt":0.37627584295762306,"score_spread":0.2156953773625457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991023345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029330445,0.13521254,0.0042984416,0.23676799,0.12053148,0.00012848034,0.0011799451,0.001753107,0.49719498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04055613,0.08196567,0.005889461,0.03092388,0.03526943,0.00017839855,0.0019209452,0.001165917,0.80213016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794203,0.00044236443,0.0001417039,0.00020034077,0.0010179472,0.00025556056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881662,0.0043257372,0.0005135196,0.0012979205,0.0036044426,0.0020922269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034282387,0.0003891252,0.0007916349,0.008344936,0.004637539,0.01094002,0.0012323234,0.0029733062,0.29659203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014820804,0.00043343208,0.00060986675,0.0071697333,0.003194031,0.017488128,0.005859961,0.0033464164,0.07696761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002259025,0.000030725667,0.00012571095,0.0003332326,0.0000023731466,0.00003541751,0.0004014425,0.0000124949765,0.00018901007,0.026074152,0.83509654,0.13767631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025076888,0.000005252876,0.00016877077,0.00034210616,0.0000017997331,0.00002980223,0.0003452194,0.000026645439,0.000036096586,0.0036368526,0.9954022,0.0000028435682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017763663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006245463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29659203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018147419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037014398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993709360","doi":"10.1080/15362426.2014.886933","title":"The Rhetorical Transformation of the Masses from Malthus’s “Redundant Population” into Marx’s “Industrial Reserve Army”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Population; Terminology; Rhetorical device; Meaning (existential); Politics; Embodied cognition; Epistemology; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Economics; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056338430944915516,"score_gpt":0.26486163160653103,"score_spread":0.2085232006616155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993709360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14162916,0.0076494305,0.08869709,0.10588667,0.0027764244,0.00014621954,0.00011517175,0.00029384374,0.6528059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861245,0.0006301696,0.0034688427,0.0017075635,0.0003880663,0.00004501796,0.000016021366,0.00007337919,0.007546629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979366,0.007929354,0.00016640036,0.00041142578,0.0013844267,0.0003148153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906522,0.0071029863,0.0005108525,0.0007603053,0.00079901016,0.00017463574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009603731,0.0004923623,0.00043045267,0.0025444927,0.005126333,0.006287929,0.0009626656,0.0019433693,0.0036181288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01671373,0.00024899002,0.00026774665,0.0014047821,0.037875496,0.010371983,0.004612544,0.0041861027,0.0005831215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132499135,0.0000052716377,0.00004288835,0.000024913534,0.0000013999296,0.0000398951,0.019964086,0.00006634624,0.00022253844,0.9746894,0.0013893368,0.0035407858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033194206,0.00007004779,0.00037848455,0.0003692731,0.000017385448,0.00024517375,0.023291841,0.0015054155,0.0019544545,0.68736863,0.28473178,0.00003435019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019292212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010453211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009603731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067087836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002284924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050789952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994219644","doi":"10.1353/crv.2011.0022","title":"A \"21st Century Economic Agenda for America\": Barack Obama's Pre-Presidential Economic Jeremiads","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Rhetoric; Democracy; Order (exchange); Happiness; Atonement; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07109355807024434,"score_gpt":0.3066129761420353,"score_spread":0.23551941807179097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994219644","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011719066,0.05253793,0.0010858489,0.5742515,0.015582685,0.000017805976,0.000049094906,0.000036545174,0.34471953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45094505,0.039813314,0.0018043863,0.24142294,0.0121529745,0.00018376258,0.000111480054,0.00013999558,0.25342607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997426,0.0011849194,0.000053914337,0.00018361569,0.00047020012,0.0006812893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831855,0.00061518303,0.00014799382,0.000052843003,0.00029806865,0.00056727714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032879722,0.0005588753,0.00036827213,0.001270268,0.017009618,0.019729892,0.00074652646,0.00513208,0.008554831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005280868,0.0002666741,0.0003042911,0.0011443475,0.008000795,0.009552268,0.0059698937,0.011900872,0.001017203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021997805,0.000029957122,0.0003695056,0.00006523692,0.0000032641547,0.00010872648,0.009242866,0.00006667184,0.00007754992,0.8128249,0.16756745,0.009621933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005702021,0.0000067812957,0.00044891212,0.00026765442,0.0000032549397,0.00003166302,0.0062039797,0.0000431871,0.00004863934,0.042620376,0.95030904,0.000010835612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020556903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033168912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020556903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008766624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009623189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06360656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994923595","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2011.604610","title":"Elocution and Feminine Power in the First Quarter of the Twentieth Century: The Career of Carolyn Winkler (Paterson) as Performer and Teacher","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Performing arts; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Rhetoric; Sociology; Art; Aesthetics; Classics; Literature; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05289596105385775,"score_gpt":0.24033704363380307,"score_spread":0.18744108257994532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994923595","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119972154,0.64918023,0.0005629655,0.10901898,0.0015568017,0.00001739296,0.000024317289,0.00001643814,0.11965078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8467235,0.11489976,0.00024743975,0.0037786227,0.0013817371,0.000026962049,0.000012022211,0.00001860462,0.032911345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974221,0.0016171308,0.00005984015,0.00016442762,0.00047170062,0.00026484067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934748,0.0047725155,0.0006623009,0.0001005871,0.0006531806,0.0003367243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039389846,0.00025505287,0.00038576708,0.0020315738,0.0064260894,0.0059455847,0.0005670886,0.0020065657,0.0024350805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005371475,0.00017882546,0.000086237,0.0015962146,0.009453165,0.0030484812,0.0023086658,0.002228958,0.00021409403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008371415,0.000056264267,0.001603747,0.001192661,0.000017737326,0.0015720644,0.3957461,0.00014507098,0.0006894119,0.40608042,0.07124408,0.12156873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000093522,0.00006786422,0.005460967,0.0022349623,0.000014010264,0.00082509505,0.11837147,0.00007153304,0.00079343014,0.008147734,0.8639847,0.000018932507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025829058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042797565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025829058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068080863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004809559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05135739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995563776","doi":"10.1007/s10912-015-9328-6","title":"Women, Writing, and Healing: Rhetoric, Religion, and Illness in An Collins, “Eliza,” and Anna Trapnel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Humanities","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Work (physics); Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10863374651475831,"score_gpt":0.31001210161493226,"score_spread":0.20137835510017393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995563776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040070046,0.08437934,0.0014835605,0.7878122,0.005185202,0.00003853781,0.00003435023,0.000029723138,0.080967166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84830153,0.027418505,0.0013007672,0.089901954,0.006735092,0.00012735666,0.000020586493,0.00010590367,0.026088383],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98839194,0.009750971,0.0002485243,0.00036514894,0.0008427787,0.00040061833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95671105,0.03829653,0.0016326378,0.00041880313,0.0014157438,0.0015253325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014663909,0.00078457285,0.00074675627,0.0021729574,0.02214537,0.016882079,0.001228913,0.0072249407,0.0028023045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027748268,0.0004691793,0.00024688873,0.0017183552,0.04326992,0.011001165,0.0052444558,0.012729992,0.00033375827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078353594,0.000086965665,0.00076712755,0.00030864598,0.000016432674,0.00026531212,0.58864576,0.000048137506,0.00022033964,0.3115712,0.08157,0.016421698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043477154,0.00005503926,0.0013711747,0.0014814953,0.000023478715,0.0004375378,0.47958198,0.00016540305,0.000404217,0.081479006,0.4349018,0.000055363074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009406625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021286583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02214537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004015168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007402225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07755107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996722258","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2009.01207.x","title":"Rich Sensitivities: An Analysis of Conflict Among Women in Feminist Memoir<sup>*</sup>","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Memoir; Gender studies; Ethnology; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.05863627378562894,"score_gpt":0.2808830243377793,"score_spread":0.22224675055215035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996722258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82147753,0.003565602,0.008714752,0.0073096748,0.00017179087,0.00018354136,0.00036559423,0.00005788707,0.15815373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908317,0.0006025436,0.0007638177,0.00036620878,0.000035950135,0.00012697291,0.00007487232,0.00003900297,0.007158863],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99177915,0.006410024,0.00019956873,0.00031963518,0.00062263577,0.0006690662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98421466,0.013292251,0.0010229186,0.0003587631,0.00065507164,0.00045648013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007418226,0.00044300174,0.000502381,0.004166521,0.011420929,0.0077320985,0.0011312314,0.0017452004,0.00631522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01534586,0.0004818116,0.00034004205,0.005067883,0.011780246,0.0070664748,0.006970341,0.0020579903,0.00033292721],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002701848,0.000009597916,0.0027181793,0.00007586659,0.000007624227,0.00052721554,0.9643173,0.000049952214,0.00019953428,0.026441002,0.00082255364,0.004804126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019127115,0.000016039576,0.007004349,0.00015715946,0.000009291169,0.00020207424,0.94691795,0.00014531658,0.00027803765,0.0052540386,0.040000983,0.000012900027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014749262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011420929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065636337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002264889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04762274},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1998147233","doi":"10.1177/0196859904267121","title":"9/11 in the Service of Corporate Rhetoric: Southwest Airlines’ 2001 Letter to Shareholders","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Communication Inquiry","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Shareholder; Service (business); Consciousness; Focus (optics); Sociology; Public relations; Corporate communication; Stakeholder; Business; Political science; Marketing; Corporate governance; Linguistics; Psychology; Literature; Finance; Art","score_opus":0.215305538495174,"score_gpt":0.3146335834646829,"score_spread":0.0993280449695089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998147233","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08628864,0.0037125098,0.00084649445,0.8311664,0.009491297,0.000027959382,0.00004429582,0.000066122986,0.06835635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6827368,0.0021528744,0.0011030051,0.16262552,0.006428822,0.000053550604,0.00004320025,0.00006647285,0.14478968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981749,0.0009794515,0.000073813775,0.00012943211,0.00036980768,0.00027255664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965184,0.002140851,0.00052807684,0.00007101658,0.00042407046,0.00031764377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037285946,0.00029104218,0.00019731704,0.0002973645,0.008751421,0.004347537,0.00050994626,0.0047759092,0.003607502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008249211,0.00017835427,0.00012016145,0.0003262441,0.00298013,0.0016791518,0.0018324851,0.006775075,0.0007951084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022164345,0.00009161052,0.002878918,0.00012183504,0.000012615087,0.0042962427,0.09446057,0.00024166882,0.003609356,0.07667095,0.7826514,0.03474307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023538185,0.00010772144,0.0040326295,0.00026567426,0.0000105986,0.0005522835,0.0354754,0.0003474564,0.0021914283,0.002593982,0.95436287,0.000036421454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010923301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027676385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010923301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046654325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023616068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033850253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999011748","doi":"10.1177/0170840608101481","title":"The Construction of General Public Interest: Risk, Legitimacy, and Power in a Public Hearing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Normative; Public interest; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Ideology; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09318661039922686,"score_gpt":0.27737563326511855,"score_spread":0.18418902286589167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999011748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15545347,0.0014602147,0.06548088,0.03639122,0.0005144365,0.00022259905,0.000039404316,0.0001707177,0.7402671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98802537,0.0001705127,0.0028624132,0.00066244305,0.00012975324,0.00006768777,0.000008171397,0.000040926407,0.008032726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97477823,0.01724927,0.00057435036,0.0013502089,0.0039492277,0.0020985915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96674824,0.026754763,0.0017438247,0.0022392187,0.0014476756,0.0010662698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024289388,0.0005964081,0.0007033495,0.0031493488,0.013577724,0.02089138,0.0019317295,0.0077253957,0.0069697765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03311792,0.0005730608,0.00079159456,0.0014290329,0.07928991,0.017349469,0.013649098,0.00761274,0.0006373245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018596877,0.00003526571,0.00044480935,0.00003597955,0.0000059698355,0.00033992124,0.03012765,0.00021427168,0.00033888366,0.9624928,0.0008868732,0.0050589535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056257188,0.00007640484,0.0011297354,0.00021434031,0.000033202567,0.00050061545,0.027213905,0.0013162784,0.0012382342,0.90661913,0.06154372,0.000058069218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029985541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002196672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006167083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046345834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12845606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003039119","doi":"10.1353/utq.0.0179","title":"The Pleasure of Fools: Essays in the Ethics of Laughter (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Pleasure; Aesthetics; Sociology; Discipline; Comedy; Greeks; Politics; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Media studies; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Social science; History; Art; Political science; Classics","score_opus":0.06105549374966084,"score_gpt":0.24409896512085213,"score_spread":0.18304347137119129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003039119","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038916376,0.9954768,0.00001537747,0.0028535642,0.001217307,0.000002756692,0.0000056272347,0.0000015648234,0.00038813613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013106139,0.9900529,0.000055094904,0.0050495844,0.0024415539,0.000026043585,0.00002366005,0.0000066848984,0.0010339338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809486,0.00077355833,0.00025178152,0.0001512075,0.0005794883,0.0001491301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927838,0.004640856,0.00087845814,0.00010521365,0.0012532325,0.00033840764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00259598,0.0010930123,0.0018996259,0.0032392826,0.0007671922,0.0031807579,0.0013252394,0.0033998762,0.005053046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01244569,0.0005631072,0.0008597649,0.0052975486,0.0027448186,0.0036689478,0.0017080853,0.0031796787,0.0024284327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010205528,0.00003567854,0.00023954181,0.03257294,0.00017440603,0.00016612794,0.0009399793,0.00009050759,0.00019980482,0.003048828,0.6732667,0.2891634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040993713,0.000051225827,0.0023681321,0.057507977,0.00012414757,0.00068667764,0.0013570393,0.000022367234,0.000061098166,0.0013712181,0.93637383,0.000035321038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033139265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075285025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005053046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002314549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004171288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016904116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003914823","doi":"10.7202/014359ar","title":"Longinus, Sappho’s Ode, and the Question of Sublimity","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de l’Université de Moncton","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.011614241824216047,"score_gpt":0.19530032488993,"score_spread":0.18368608306571393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003914823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07755242,0.011297023,0.0013315583,0.017212791,0.0004914481,0.000008244826,0.000032770786,0.000029358314,0.8920444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94549346,0.0017820882,0.0002502816,0.0012310048,0.00031388,0.000009340872,0.000011047312,0.000032343887,0.050876413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947554,0.00026581445,0.0000106055995,0.00007547538,0.000070579204,0.00010203105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965477,0.00017310475,0.000041388856,0.000029383877,0.000039242204,0.00006218011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006138295,0.00026565875,0.00020929339,0.00044889352,0.0041989866,0.0045111114,0.0003405631,0.0013113187,0.0052756155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095072313,0.0001089206,0.00010617485,0.00040268825,0.013321958,0.004305279,0.0019176533,0.0014749722,0.00038547866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028264396,0.000004879662,0.00025887357,0.00004352465,0.0000013090006,0.00008889636,0.024391776,0.000024014278,0.00015068371,0.96569574,0.0035817209,0.0057303626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030074385,0.00003328442,0.00358929,0.00022342172,0.000007714804,0.00032919826,0.035027154,0.00025442132,0.0005364789,0.42784804,0.53209674,0.000024174207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090337545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02100058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090337545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003398343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017630602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024656832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003970540","doi":"10.1177/1750635210360082","title":"‘The vermin have struck again’: dehumanizing the enemy in post 9/11 media representations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Media War & Conflict","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Framing (construction); Newspaper; Media studies; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Aesthetics; Sociology; History; Political science; Literature; Law; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059667506553588025,"score_gpt":0.2816946077630074,"score_spread":0.2220271012094194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003970540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5942235,0.008057451,0.006203094,0.05375064,0.0012206844,0.000034874636,0.000064863074,0.00012008245,0.33632487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909712,0.0009537531,0.00032740162,0.0019843173,0.00028122411,0.000011544028,0.000012915992,0.000045987057,0.0054115606],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956584,0.0033535422,0.000071083094,0.00017460319,0.00040676017,0.00033566856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919797,0.006330308,0.00069624855,0.00045401906,0.00031123077,0.00022846914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004679972,0.00059414434,0.0002455546,0.0021480406,0.010036741,0.011100516,0.00066215004,0.0029812725,0.0032543964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008891444,0.00034841237,0.00018511416,0.0012608423,0.032568906,0.0079277195,0.005564178,0.004435504,0.00040580428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003803362,0.000020482428,0.00090178184,0.00007614828,0.000007983129,0.0005961514,0.8358773,0.00005011722,0.0009781895,0.14700058,0.0053982106,0.009054931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018682613,0.000061322695,0.0028302227,0.00054149795,0.000029888406,0.0011421717,0.59825784,0.00040044397,0.0029208895,0.030441506,0.36331883,0.000036750465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003842708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046222243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011100516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031460077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010757011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024750412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005986955","doi":"10.1353/mos.2012.0027","title":"The Ethics of Laughter: David Sedaris and Humour Memoir","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Biography; Comics; Laughter; Context (archaeology); Style (visual arts); Narrative; Literature; Negotiation; Storytelling; Art; Order (exchange); Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.08087416020726727,"score_gpt":0.29040190218474393,"score_spread":0.20952774197747664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005986955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09334853,0.038170345,0.023309598,0.25052303,0.0029025958,0.000038811253,0.00003293312,0.000121844365,0.5915522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96136934,0.0034102013,0.0024409525,0.0047802473,0.0008972152,0.000035369154,0.000006151011,0.0000760951,0.026984364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106276,0.0075209886,0.00008396228,0.00025763293,0.00076200865,0.0003125378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079037,0.00734997,0.0003143465,0.00044198212,0.00067656295,0.00042680238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00837629,0.000363966,0.00039163875,0.0014411872,0.010313735,0.008178869,0.0009164259,0.004345193,0.0019374635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012553872,0.00028411648,0.00016484132,0.00089919794,0.060788114,0.007968265,0.004699438,0.0040176213,0.00055765815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013586074,0.000006819029,0.00009815455,0.000025230447,0.0000025677123,0.0001121589,0.048295885,0.000078573605,0.00010710455,0.9410276,0.0058624297,0.0043698573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019289375,0.000022940849,0.0002554673,0.00028042548,0.0000064035185,0.0003208773,0.044743817,0.00047461048,0.00050842937,0.67710835,0.27623394,0.000025481797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004517952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051783537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010313735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054691266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031337272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04429859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008435593","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0054","title":"Guide(s) for the Perplexed","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Consciousness; Sociology; Phenomenon; Social life; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social science; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.17806483517252428,"score_gpt":0.29687968824305805,"score_spread":0.11881485307053377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008435593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026942373,0.003583015,0.09231818,0.10696741,0.054765802,0.0045995507,0.009828473,0.024231147,0.70101213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007893097,0.0013703424,0.052363634,0.019727811,0.0037070957,0.0023143624,0.0023102749,0.0055474155,0.904766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621564,0.001495088,0.00035655726,0.00046340583,0.001222065,0.00024727214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98273724,0.0052608047,0.0006499347,0.0029454036,0.0063466374,0.0020598678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051446045,0.0011199344,0.0008792124,0.002843752,0.0028541638,0.0052143764,0.0024884664,0.004149661,0.46370855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03030022,0.00065376505,0.00096545176,0.0011688292,0.0021403062,0.004488557,0.005148767,0.005066347,0.40394253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030475192,0.000028437853,0.000057938298,0.00013921253,0.0000020768655,0.00011392339,0.0005304524,0.000046445333,0.0003643445,0.0074954927,0.9247353,0.066455886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056790377,0.000008399751,0.000031888416,0.00008360834,0.0000010289024,0.000114232535,0.00020473861,0.000050301227,0.00009816526,0.0018238516,0.997572,0.0000060702846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002343179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045662415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46370855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001666388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042240294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7649547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009716711","doi":"10.7748/nr2002.04.9.3.28.c6187","title":"<i>A post-colonial analysis of healthcare discourses addressing aboriginal women</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Nurse Researcher","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Health care; Cervical cancer; Sociology; Healthcare system; Political science; History; Medicine; Cancer; Law","score_opus":0.23694123425661315,"score_gpt":0.467175027496661,"score_spread":0.23023379324004786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009716711","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037413266,0.7983519,0.0018153818,0.07107883,0.0024348143,0.00033400583,0.00011553858,0.000039711806,0.08841648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28346238,0.66167235,0.0041386927,0.020298991,0.0006621567,0.000436178,0.00011863147,0.000035233563,0.029175371],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979108,0.0012386127,0.00010259572,0.000070888906,0.00045661564,0.00022061504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564505,0.0026447421,0.0005081247,0.00010640188,0.00096310483,0.0001326144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041830325,0.00047264286,0.0006184876,0.0032621191,0.0041150833,0.005511331,0.00095315254,0.0014897578,0.0018836835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072314288,0.00022713105,0.000384378,0.0061790682,0.004960472,0.0029442639,0.0021226984,0.001239783,0.00037550536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010754138,0.000049719205,0.0041208104,0.017105034,0.00011211334,0.0038067945,0.5315305,0.00036643064,0.0025141,0.065743625,0.07159598,0.3029474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011001161,0.00006415559,0.009663616,0.011578539,0.00011195359,0.0014060626,0.34528944,0.000107816784,0.0013462448,0.0043825144,0.6259937,0.000045010176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35588804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61380786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35588804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009629145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025765415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7076331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010236236","doi":"10.1353/esc.2011.0004","title":"\"Holo what?\" or, The Exceptional Business of Naming: A Dialogue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Rhetorical question; Foregrounding; Narrative; Rhetoric; Sociology; Indigenous; Sentence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.196470156133691,"score_gpt":0.2675435819574801,"score_spread":0.07107342582378912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010236236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0923911,0.024177896,0.0074969586,0.46766093,0.0063067875,0.000113280235,0.00010141465,0.00018799126,0.40156367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87551975,0.006737705,0.003361099,0.028818542,0.0014629544,0.00012082687,0.000032225773,0.000211197,0.08373576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926555,0.0050415383,0.00009255248,0.0004122647,0.0010198522,0.00077831565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586016,0.0025820495,0.00020275476,0.00012547798,0.00044313935,0.0007863493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071031954,0.00062893744,0.00055723096,0.0014341834,0.02751009,0.013296347,0.0015338616,0.0058147833,0.0032515563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076685953,0.00029254248,0.00026272883,0.0014649726,0.043928485,0.014314056,0.0059729395,0.008821034,0.0005896723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015249345,0.000019357909,0.0001850393,0.000063691274,0.0000032852986,0.00039241716,0.6448645,0.00006299537,0.00037934812,0.30588803,0.040856533,0.0072695487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004041172,0.000012525838,0.0005024451,0.00023386322,0.0000039210086,0.00027077945,0.45504874,0.0001693049,0.00017895314,0.026072528,0.5174738,0.00002897841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10654193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15553221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10654193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02185327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012022536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21184355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010500642","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.26.2.173","title":"Jewish Performativity on<i>Sex and the City</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Judaism; Performative utterance; Jewish identity; Sociology; Identity (music); Normative; Gender studies; Jewish studies; Aesthetics; Religious studies; Art; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02235821989245549,"score_gpt":0.23824080903895298,"score_spread":0.2158825891464975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010500642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57277656,0.00083864335,0.0013160604,0.0035529311,0.00018288633,0.000012394698,0.000024208419,0.000021539487,0.42127472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911254,0.0001101838,0.00009937203,0.00023446434,0.000024764264,0.0000032106148,0.000005367126,0.000010623647,0.008386583],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999114,0.00051179435,0.000015283933,0.000050844854,0.00012578773,0.00018237611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993678,0.0002450405,0.00010668031,0.000054490138,0.00011919278,0.00010693546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001195835,0.00020953278,0.00015645291,0.00069454405,0.011396797,0.0044956924,0.0003511459,0.0008895976,0.0037629765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010687008,0.000121305224,0.00013446937,0.0005738072,0.015036321,0.0010261784,0.0024655892,0.0012287918,0.00044067262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071533505,0.000031356714,0.005616593,0.00004313099,0.00000875636,0.0006157647,0.61656225,0.000035802535,0.001663111,0.36233413,0.002636517,0.010381026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020809293,0.00010249396,0.01926283,0.00023753574,0.000025237618,0.0010053087,0.680639,0.0001785865,0.0023131815,0.016677728,0.27949616,0.00004107325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030014662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06216282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030014662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032949287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015529476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059679925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012380917","doi":"10.1177/0741088309353505","title":"Constitutive Rhetoric as an Aspect of Audience Design: The Public Texts of Canadian Suffragists","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Written Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Suffrage; Skepticism; Politics; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09000716837523187,"score_gpt":0.27964846862372955,"score_spread":0.18964130024849768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012380917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6302999,0.0037721437,0.0049773213,0.018208517,0.00030574316,0.00009329104,0.00016799213,0.00012312822,0.3420519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933682,0.00032345252,0.00035884665,0.00030346343,0.00003646494,0.000011862256,0.000019036848,0.000029430908,0.0055492315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293584,0.0027650471,0.00015512046,0.00045238843,0.002493183,0.0011983436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840426,0.010693325,0.0011929998,0.0006026266,0.002718236,0.0007501787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008964189,0.00059891335,0.0005746265,0.0060048304,0.03229137,0.013311758,0.0013178801,0.0024694484,0.0032539263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022541827,0.0005210226,0.0002319731,0.0052046007,0.03478792,0.0038951815,0.005275048,0.0034244824,0.00019866553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034284047,0.000008533893,0.0013886245,0.00010774665,0.0000057075704,0.0003276229,0.88929975,0.00007147664,0.0008766565,0.097540654,0.0019184862,0.008420418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027849466,0.000033234795,0.016010864,0.00048521836,0.000049308397,0.0003435952,0.69719994,0.00056103594,0.002487325,0.016497819,0.26619473,0.000109112145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7811275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86299366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21887249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079247564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04741925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.574984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012995914","doi":"10.1177/0196859906294840","title":"Internet Web Logs as Cultural Resistance: A Study of the SARS Arts Project","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Communication Inquiry","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; CONTEST; Resistance (ecology); Opposition (politics); Politics; The arts; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.15116532716033126,"score_gpt":0.3427193912365698,"score_spread":0.19155406407623854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012995914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98779106,0.0001756034,0.00042612886,0.0018776673,0.000030411607,0.000072457,0.000027090518,0.000015411544,0.009584184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950599,0.00039762777,0.00040417135,0.0006423838,0.000035515797,0.00014885425,0.000029021918,0.000035334444,0.003247243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868699,0.010385236,0.0002180456,0.00048134432,0.0009453881,0.0011001991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97397375,0.019721907,0.002542598,0.0009350748,0.0010207219,0.001805987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009755944,0.0006703681,0.00073484384,0.0034205413,0.015779939,0.0095538525,0.0021732633,0.0031631738,0.004486478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026606862,0.0008951187,0.0002697573,0.002493699,0.014353543,0.0065218504,0.0078327395,0.0055167745,0.0006775173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019762063,0.00018974395,0.003080342,0.000034009776,0.0000028766015,0.00065073546,0.990141,0.000012428525,0.0001730199,0.0012009275,0.0005671086,0.003927996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064933947,0.00005630764,0.0022387381,0.000049028953,0.0000024229519,0.0001981167,0.9912032,0.00006131817,0.00008518927,0.00025891906,0.0058336877,0.0000067178476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007387983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013870203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015779939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032412538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033767873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051594973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014687644","doi":"10.2752/174063106778053255","title":"Under the Kitchen Surface: Domestic Products and Conflicting Constructions of Home","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Home Cultures","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assumption University","funders":"Johnson and Johnson","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Housekeeping; Narrative; Assertion; Safe haven; Reading (process); Competition (biology); Business; Sociology; Marketing; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0318025312605568,"score_gpt":0.2670534320985357,"score_spread":0.23525090083797892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014687644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7302909,0.010679043,0.006094079,0.009027051,0.00028557403,0.0000161536,0.000042922493,0.00005468707,0.24350968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601716,0.0006609651,0.00036356688,0.00023907496,0.000046919104,0.0000058455876,0.000008448231,0.00002548263,0.002632586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509,0.0038277043,0.000096584925,0.0002623528,0.00045131732,0.0002719253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443334,0.0043589463,0.00042481394,0.00033455563,0.0002898607,0.00015848377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041986257,0.00057883887,0.00043819155,0.0024013848,0.008670066,0.0073945047,0.00081442716,0.0022937418,0.0028121315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005769917,0.00039103397,0.00023183647,0.0016995627,0.029226158,0.009031245,0.0057032187,0.002135537,0.00027310415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034652043,0.000010106347,0.0011479415,0.00011841569,0.000005520857,0.00063812156,0.8526781,0.000043649652,0.0004921642,0.13726869,0.00085005903,0.0067126127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014108928,0.00006838138,0.0036808623,0.00064754393,0.000028491932,0.0012957191,0.83107173,0.00026581762,0.0019422724,0.027534582,0.13341837,0.000032024258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030189638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035618034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008670066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034834275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010228568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025274158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016422736","doi":"10.1007/s10912-006-9016-7","title":"Negotiating Public and Professional Interests: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Debate Concerning the Regulation of Midwifery in Ontario, Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Humanities","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Appeal; Negotiation; Health care; Sociology; Identity (music); Discourse analysis; Childbirth; Obstetrics; Public relations; Nursing; Political science; Medicine; Law; Social science; Aesthetics; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.07946453284268562,"score_gpt":0.2638852109104873,"score_spread":0.18442067806780166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016422736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41417432,0.008917671,0.0020127958,0.23370662,0.00051582244,0.00025989127,0.00046091346,0.00004350438,0.33990845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685951,0.0027285193,0.0007917577,0.0063194428,0.00008134775,0.00006434032,0.000057842462,0.000037843354,0.021323716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832281,0.0044398988,0.0005573798,0.0008800214,0.006179363,0.0047153844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9418675,0.039759804,0.0026068725,0.00061159785,0.01149005,0.00366427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01621233,0.00044772646,0.00090374984,0.003988179,0.07001461,0.020192672,0.004148686,0.0088596735,0.008093202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045307785,0.0010049748,0.0005424398,0.010147281,0.0288671,0.0038380597,0.005701621,0.010187452,0.00034113612],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023864568,0.00007338137,0.0133221755,0.0005175788,0.000053365362,0.0015027974,0.43492964,0.0012230859,0.0006237188,0.4872806,0.03986687,0.020368172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014805744,0.00006204884,0.03624707,0.0013348496,0.00016492477,0.00017866599,0.50948954,0.002059913,0.0007271834,0.036929514,0.41244668,0.00021156867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9299854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.4025636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47043264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69294155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017689028","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.6.887","title":"Seeing Red over Black and White: Popular and Media Representations of Inter-racial Relationships as Precursors to Racial Violence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Antipathy; Hostility; White (mutation); Mythology; Racism; Sociology; Race (biology); Hatred; Gender studies; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Law; Literature; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.11113354433893045,"score_gpt":0.3052609115345451,"score_spread":0.19412736719561463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017689028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8861047,0.0035244434,0.0007484608,0.013264141,0.00037826618,0.00001573934,0.000049860497,0.000025066625,0.09588928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954365,0.0011352795,0.0001204857,0.00057821034,0.00011786337,0.000006030108,0.000009866348,0.000014520915,0.0025813053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985221,0.0009937666,0.000035508045,0.00008044203,0.00021300724,0.00015531745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584526,0.0027190575,0.00073963753,0.00019045926,0.00024181421,0.00026387884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017915546,0.00039053013,0.00018742052,0.0018282927,0.008004368,0.0072661308,0.00054428744,0.001564519,0.003409963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005844455,0.0002829436,0.00015537774,0.0010974763,0.008876443,0.0039174,0.0032721378,0.0026116874,0.00027510384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038513906,0.00002665011,0.007034013,0.000066968154,0.000009987789,0.0006420845,0.95766324,0.000015748117,0.00057561084,0.018259332,0.0019123247,0.013755554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082878005,0.00006157129,0.021814015,0.00040953318,0.000047487312,0.0011548714,0.9054661,0.00016186488,0.0008151638,0.0031627472,0.06686695,0.00003138591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012062527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023578871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98793745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018030267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096536084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023984611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017879816","doi":"10.1177/1470357209356373","title":"Powell’s point: ‘denial and deception’ at the UN","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Visual Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Denial; Representation (politics); Deception; Point (geometry); Visual media; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Multimedia; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.022084801313258455,"score_gpt":0.27197475261945087,"score_spread":0.2498899513061924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017879816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027385246,0.014417856,0.032849066,0.4005858,0.0042565847,0.000040768,0.00004399777,0.00016159771,0.520259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005228,0.0031942592,0.0042918534,0.039397486,0.0009968833,0.000056687786,0.000012233011,0.00013527008,0.051392436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98950607,0.0070430995,0.00020527025,0.0007233731,0.001787825,0.0007343793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914641,0.0064335368,0.00049533823,0.0006448814,0.0007475292,0.00021465655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006096392,0.00045728454,0.0003254945,0.00092486216,0.01075216,0.0098438775,0.0010395839,0.009140222,0.0039295815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025689727,0.0003212273,0.0003235003,0.0007793827,0.030536845,0.0129805,0.0042054118,0.012440739,0.00077644765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019694748,0.0000050423573,0.00010520954,0.000051230705,0.0000030327044,0.0002976322,0.04104781,0.00008471306,0.0001304243,0.9153135,0.031260982,0.011680789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075523158,0.00002498698,0.00034396004,0.00060773693,0.000009134538,0.0008584662,0.030840408,0.0004129162,0.0010042883,0.2798245,0.6860288,0.000037311394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009638644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008218993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01075216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004277447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002485079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032241166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019184110","doi":"10.3828/bj.2014.16","title":"‘The Controlless Core of Human Hearts’: Writing the Self in Byron's <i>Don Juan</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Byron Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Elegiac; Literature; Illusion; Art; History; Philosophy; Poetry; Psychology","score_opus":0.04505232906470369,"score_gpt":0.26869356208711,"score_spread":0.2236412330224063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019184110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35445738,0.008512781,0.015586745,0.041866355,0.0026897213,0.0000461363,0.000034768895,0.00014126515,0.57666487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98559827,0.0003824798,0.0006883015,0.0008592322,0.00016397702,0.000012623092,0.0000052511487,0.00005914736,0.012230702],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675107,0.002554777,0.000041754734,0.0001846481,0.00026095493,0.00020686234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965649,0.0025016093,0.00026686347,0.00019617003,0.00022309572,0.00024741262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034817827,0.00032235877,0.00033754666,0.00059684797,0.006586358,0.0068243784,0.00047510667,0.0014408311,0.0022792262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076325173,0.00017228795,0.00015996271,0.00038644377,0.030843737,0.005094508,0.0034624445,0.0026647155,0.0003386724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006139793,0.000012202072,0.00038389632,0.00010768245,0.0000046591963,0.0003748205,0.50375366,0.0000645654,0.00078101904,0.48042086,0.006205613,0.00782961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024196517,0.00010623931,0.001363435,0.00057280366,0.000019220959,0.0010510484,0.35195798,0.0004994882,0.0019422112,0.13021877,0.51219255,0.000051979558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002514374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028908027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068243784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020936502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012408067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018413603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020439191","doi":"10.1177/000842980203100307","title":"Criticizing \"secular criticism\": Reading religion in Edward Said and Kathryn Tanner","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Wish; Reading (process); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.14451901627610542,"score_gpt":0.34781692439670675,"score_spread":0.20329790812060133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020439191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11632864,0.07225722,0.004475803,0.6173226,0.002250627,0.000027268252,0.0000338941,0.00005094186,0.18725294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404817,0.009609929,0.0010151723,0.028196486,0.0009511784,0.000031366922,0.0000072070957,0.000046730605,0.019660259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99130356,0.0068380465,0.00014234637,0.00035670915,0.00090113806,0.00045807863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97966194,0.017240584,0.0010138735,0.00042765655,0.0012699347,0.00038593495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056053167,0.00032898173,0.00047415908,0.0014095086,0.009140602,0.0073415996,0.001218661,0.0054999082,0.0015256389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016610164,0.00030367178,0.00024092731,0.0010271912,0.03720018,0.0054129655,0.0036470836,0.0069525144,0.00033341066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031430613,0.000016945749,0.00055439724,0.00014386835,0.000007623449,0.0003783496,0.19706133,0.000218226,0.00022089023,0.76396847,0.030279126,0.007119481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028461896,0.000034537374,0.0016222158,0.0012166712,0.000033917844,0.000611048,0.13973024,0.00050281663,0.00095212617,0.3101492,0.5450609,0.000057933943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027122067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02938036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027122067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009098866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035618984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06601727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020500505","doi":"10.1075/pc.19.3.01tin","title":"Out of the Space of Reasons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pragmatics & Cognition","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Common Fund","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Realm; Space (punctuation); Personhood; Epistemology; Rhetoric; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer security; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10904715622007047,"score_gpt":0.2552478712419941,"score_spread":0.14620071502192364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020500505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050509654,0.009658148,0.29748124,0.03723267,0.0013832914,0.000105588675,0.00026582685,0.0003788459,0.6029847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94302106,0.0016853021,0.030883508,0.001510633,0.00045192236,0.00013085209,0.00016362798,0.00022882858,0.021924164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991335,0.0057668085,0.00029931578,0.00091620244,0.0012231834,0.00045956776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075305,0.005900898,0.0006639812,0.0013607641,0.00091455545,0.00040680295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007265979,0.00069775706,0.0007709717,0.0023297798,0.005361198,0.012110149,0.0010649662,0.003202529,0.010779521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013027232,0.0004752523,0.0013046787,0.0014254989,0.030958608,0.020162137,0.007092287,0.004070853,0.0016008127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097347465,0.0000022785557,0.000070956296,0.00002198136,0.0000032758458,0.000030900428,0.002121517,0.000101462196,0.000067957975,0.9951343,0.00041217412,0.0020235307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010314853,0.000011356146,0.000089058645,0.000051861614,0.0000070454375,0.00007637368,0.0018120733,0.00041545773,0.00014631903,0.9473883,0.04998317,0.0000085993515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011716188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009990718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012110149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020841288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027284487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038426638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022524258","doi":"10.1353/utq.2010.0027","title":"The Bias of Communication (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Plea; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; History; Media studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030152001326172264,"score_gpt":0.22394246377608923,"score_spread":0.19379046244991696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022524258","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006164628,0.99404,0.000045163182,0.0014325611,0.0016858049,0.000018758175,0.00011814313,0.000012977012,0.0025849673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007878376,0.9931559,0.0000895641,0.002209913,0.0012674037,0.000035421785,0.0001995441,0.0000063265175,0.0022481834],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990363,0.00017989596,0.00017444631,0.0001502243,0.00037702796,0.00008209935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976477,0.00088809396,0.00047451293,0.00006202147,0.0007687722,0.00015888602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010407126,0.0010332562,0.0019806167,0.003548292,0.00047180423,0.0030697507,0.0017157904,0.001550255,0.042472832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005768634,0.0004584774,0.0009092682,0.005917379,0.00065224466,0.0023226342,0.0012999022,0.0023238633,0.013426897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067296976,0.00002690189,0.0002194135,0.064157546,0.0001553852,0.0001484432,0.00012309602,0.00008822894,0.00019153698,0.0012727851,0.41341585,0.5201335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030149551,0.000035724588,0.0014504662,0.038603533,0.0002518209,0.0006997607,0.0001560792,0.000023842662,0.00008322684,0.0005623883,0.95807964,0.000023275381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033741198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050412077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042472832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014258642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004512737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14208579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026470257","doi":"10.1046/j.1466-769x.2003.00130.x","title":"Cultivating a worldly repose: the contribution of Sally Gadow's work to interpretive inquiry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Philosophy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Subjectivity; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Opposition (politics); Genius; Metaphysics; Aesthetics; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06628466289749081,"score_gpt":0.30306043578413117,"score_spread":0.23677577288664037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026470257","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06717005,0.06370296,0.08026533,0.60721964,0.010500572,0.00013361512,0.00005484798,0.0003937209,0.1705592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89292055,0.014089618,0.030034253,0.04352968,0.0035438086,0.0002823501,0.000023931307,0.00032227352,0.015253496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660267,0.028557096,0.00046900226,0.0011394918,0.0027317605,0.0010758726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9319402,0.058669366,0.0017279023,0.0025169714,0.0027220347,0.0024235123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024560243,0.0008413021,0.001088697,0.0051020253,0.017163705,0.021308871,0.0024628548,0.0051384186,0.0013180942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032979455,0.0007174254,0.0007786842,0.0029787195,0.12587251,0.015732037,0.014134561,0.012082762,0.00044346694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022513028,0.00002353042,0.00035272999,0.00015680837,0.000010633083,0.0004101335,0.25157276,0.00013916215,0.00014953715,0.7163673,0.017569859,0.0132249165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021773214,0.000039237748,0.00024184688,0.00081754517,0.000021974329,0.00094105693,0.08843495,0.0006240532,0.0005475642,0.57398176,0.33425996,0.000068330184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00604298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00784664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024560243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008179399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009971964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12988853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026671368","doi":"10.1093/nq/50.3.298","title":"Induced Indigestion and Ann Radcliffe's Posthumous American Reputation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notes and Queries","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigestion; Reputation; Traditional medicine; Medicine; Gerontology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03852326779702741,"score_gpt":0.25049770870235966,"score_spread":0.21197444090533224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026671368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06536606,0.0061355885,0.00058587163,0.53686243,0.0057431883,0.0000099558565,0.000037087313,0.000049366045,0.38521042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66809964,0.0019958944,0.0002970763,0.065214336,0.001753699,0.000013019551,0.000014983654,0.00007474792,0.26253667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749064,0.00082096684,0.000063887615,0.00025097386,0.0006037742,0.0007697398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923407,0.003896662,0.00041597267,0.00048951246,0.0014627437,0.0013945369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043603405,0.00020888727,0.0003675202,0.0012050369,0.022733426,0.007975052,0.0007514352,0.007102556,0.0057927477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138647435,0.00026166838,0.00015928115,0.0010954249,0.01509702,0.0035576983,0.0034688027,0.013712881,0.0011034086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033725395,0.00003694182,0.0021568246,0.000013024861,0.0000068504232,0.0009739442,0.03536172,0.000042528125,0.0001186267,0.70984167,0.2345002,0.01691384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012398555,0.000010856309,0.002840909,0.000072290444,0.000008014191,0.00047571896,0.016662654,0.00011074438,0.00020532878,0.03966827,0.9399025,0.00003027075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07253115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20081274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07253115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010383203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056098024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14421797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027407911","doi":"10.1353/utq.2012.0025","title":"Pure Persuasion: Metarhetorical Motives in Kenneth Burke's Towards a Better Life","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Neologism; Uncanny; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Epistemology; Energy (signal processing); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03227735847763242,"score_gpt":0.22121946911069296,"score_spread":0.18894211063306054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027407911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08762582,0.016799381,0.021150136,0.38041466,0.0028014234,0.000054738262,0.000046291774,0.00016296864,0.49094456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447572,0.0018315011,0.0033515396,0.0108757,0.00047732363,0.000056912464,0.000007717175,0.00008825138,0.038553827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939241,0.004835045,0.00008340069,0.00032115204,0.0005808091,0.00025543084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954678,0.0031899635,0.00032687036,0.00028168852,0.000345401,0.00038827478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004322666,0.0003340247,0.00029995933,0.0005682189,0.0062172604,0.008045676,0.00063039514,0.0037592708,0.0020366353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008021333,0.00025283266,0.00016931984,0.0004054729,0.033792153,0.0063053234,0.0029925401,0.0058540497,0.00050184614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001573077,0.000013600143,0.00009987483,0.000032823908,0.0000027520941,0.00014037914,0.045472417,0.000054266005,0.00015700712,0.93932784,0.011584048,0.0030992995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030726005,0.000036412046,0.00041274485,0.0001981315,0.000008068238,0.0006179564,0.03517427,0.00044744508,0.0007476203,0.49202967,0.47025996,0.000036902413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022542612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040980214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008045676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034709065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018798091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02518338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028072914","doi":"10.1177/0021934709352987","title":"Slumming and/as Self-Making in Barack Obama’s <i>Dreams From My Father</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Black Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Narrative; Nationalism; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Literature; Art; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05118613458600793,"score_gpt":0.30332973403589253,"score_spread":0.2521435994498846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028072914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.468032,0.005155527,0.0057959873,0.031779293,0.0010907778,0.000041736177,0.000055465578,0.00009913679,0.48795012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97505367,0.00062194734,0.0007063789,0.00091866986,0.00011249307,0.000016184014,0.000011674842,0.000058909754,0.0225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985322,0.0011391098,0.000015528072,0.000070962815,0.000114850016,0.00012736862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903905,0.000527569,0.00012127307,0.000048424572,0.00009069041,0.00017316833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016488433,0.00045953388,0.00018383224,0.0006497112,0.010620667,0.0052796183,0.0004928415,0.0011452868,0.0032852213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021061962,0.00021688543,0.00015029144,0.00031092454,0.013556263,0.0039090193,0.0035898122,0.0026015935,0.00039684027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047657082,0.000022603082,0.0007044641,0.00007433981,0.000004828702,0.00063039776,0.7937219,0.000057328947,0.00052847835,0.18953787,0.008783882,0.0058863354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011107766,0.000042133255,0.0014514362,0.00025546763,0.0000123045,0.00064163306,0.61842585,0.00023245226,0.0015506597,0.01976975,0.35758373,0.000023581906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00772522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016068174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010620667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023781802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011195777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017255008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029458353","doi":"10.1353/ces.2008.0011","title":"The Nisga'a Treaty: Polling Dynamics and Political Communication in Comparative Context (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polling; Treaty; Politics; Public opinion; Context (archaeology); Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Democracy; Legislature; Public administration; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.35549841683592087,"score_gpt":0.3901965171645705,"score_spread":0.03469810032864962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029458353","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003901371,0.9981408,0.000012161291,0.0006977541,0.0004687902,0.0000030842716,0.000012127749,0.000001883864,0.0006242899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008881117,0.9970594,0.000038944283,0.0006979862,0.0005827896,0.000011954394,0.000040914034,0.000002844974,0.0006769752],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990753,0.00031435958,0.00011583838,0.00011744016,0.00029225653,0.000084777384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623543,0.0022319104,0.000476454,0.00006396503,0.0007909553,0.00020129823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013450761,0.00088004593,0.002085475,0.0059647034,0.00076632015,0.0036472115,0.001295148,0.0021717336,0.01888651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006249676,0.0005499568,0.0007804597,0.014048408,0.0013680494,0.0038862517,0.0012968157,0.0026066988,0.003470671],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009002251,0.000051870404,0.0005087381,0.066741295,0.00016285187,0.00016528391,0.00068161206,0.00015920842,0.0001924391,0.004141624,0.3163313,0.6107738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032902662,0.000073489566,0.006203528,0.07313398,0.00021918309,0.000671785,0.0013033121,0.00006106227,0.000090918154,0.0017309178,0.9164349,0.000043993332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011983559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021132791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019551998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048085977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06318164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032870531","doi":"10.1080/0951839032000086763","title":"Creating spaces: Testimonio, impossible knowledge, and academe","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.28269802395660676,"score_gpt":0.5211227139776282,"score_spread":0.23842469002102146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032870531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2973944,0.012736361,0.052482568,0.07525569,0.0010763127,0.00010731083,0.00007878547,0.0002130257,0.5606556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887949,0.0010120227,0.0035129443,0.0013500922,0.00008390991,0.00004650765,0.000011494358,0.000035785142,0.005152237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95357764,0.040110696,0.00075552444,0.0011399736,0.002812379,0.0016038564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95544624,0.035530347,0.0030472362,0.0025521046,0.0012981952,0.0021258707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01795604,0.00045297213,0.0006115845,0.0024999173,0.018714748,0.020449458,0.0015609331,0.0049489057,0.0045319283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03943673,0.0005619528,0.00041892246,0.0015410945,0.06587204,0.022547383,0.02540287,0.0058248118,0.00064227096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003674909,0.000038481685,0.0012251566,0.00027125378,0.000011879545,0.00053712167,0.5432097,0.00014307408,0.00038298542,0.42943662,0.0024750626,0.022231918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001922704,0.000060543418,0.0011110477,0.00079123356,0.000021242686,0.0008486466,0.61546135,0.00036419847,0.0012546928,0.20776674,0.17224488,0.00005612738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015436257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025699977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00352703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039816136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0949617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034049126","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.2014.017","title":"Identity and Deference: <i>A Border Within</i> 15 Years On","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Deference; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Sociology; National identity; State (computer science); Situated; Power (physics); Political science; Gender studies; Epistemology; Political economy; Law; Aesthetics; Politics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07874076908622808,"score_gpt":0.32701378212416604,"score_spread":0.24827301303793797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034049126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031364918,0.054735344,0.005241798,0.30539888,0.01846211,0.00003848362,0.00009937999,0.000094665695,0.5845644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75782746,0.012479188,0.0014699899,0.044866547,0.004009455,0.000040267405,0.000052930503,0.0001727898,0.17908129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960969,0.001508515,0.000069085836,0.00041424448,0.0009699328,0.0009414032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971923,0.0009118265,0.0001434042,0.00013838518,0.0011365225,0.00047752698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034466034,0.00045741358,0.0004845691,0.001168901,0.015735375,0.01031302,0.0012676694,0.0029436874,0.006574164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056211557,0.00022311282,0.0003951979,0.0010336555,0.02395618,0.00813086,0.004409412,0.0074072373,0.0010341317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029470668,0.000011338855,0.0003315624,0.000057401256,0.0000052457362,0.00016899526,0.051667348,0.000043428485,0.00012738803,0.8821473,0.052260395,0.013150066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006095358,0.000017988528,0.00060618,0.00035681494,0.000009317794,0.00009772143,0.022978615,0.00006341099,0.00018594369,0.060106147,0.9155495,0.000022192415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34108862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3273372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65891135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029425493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015702795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67820656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037120023","doi":"10.1162/152651603322614445","title":"Assent and Dissent in 407 Research with Children","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Dissent; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.2160085941773578,"score_gpt":0.3831364675293569,"score_spread":0.16712787335199913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037120023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08447618,0.004222367,0.00047526506,0.8652886,0.0037517673,0.0001292091,0.00006161004,0.000012056823,0.04158287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33020267,0.0020479376,0.0006100549,0.6398107,0.003144834,0.0004901396,0.000021748247,0.000029234667,0.023642682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9183635,0.05848598,0.003596503,0.005110063,0.0062726345,0.008171287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7234478,0.25059548,0.0072054206,0.003221102,0.005383513,0.010146678],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07886808,0.00052801793,0.0013589057,0.0014644697,0.036877297,0.010152157,0.0034496202,0.066566005,0.0071795834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2057313,0.0011330514,0.0011010299,0.0013216264,0.028466078,0.010260768,0.009268609,0.04072228,0.00094240264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054570567,0.00036942525,0.012567632,0.0003703037,0.00017655027,0.023676135,0.53384775,0.00016012824,0.00089846645,0.2096902,0.19079576,0.02690189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003340361,0.0003389542,0.009409186,0.002305468,0.00020497982,0.009364358,0.49693674,0.0004037091,0.002252151,0.07861832,0.3996512,0.00018088518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021925792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06797104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01214951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022396686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4170993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037186032","doi":"10.7202/040825ar","title":"On Being “Anti-Sublimed”: Early Tales of Fear and Glory at Niagara Falls","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian Society for International Health","funders":"Cape Breton University","keywords":"Sublime; Glory; Adventure; Meaning (existential); Feeling; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Art history; Epistemology","score_opus":0.048867442875656995,"score_gpt":0.28029190100423523,"score_spread":0.23142445812857823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037186032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2727107,0.010610813,0.004815539,0.04933981,0.0014735835,0.0000447763,0.000038799506,0.00012442714,0.6608416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95916307,0.001196794,0.0004824073,0.001452657,0.00011523167,0.000019602583,0.000010050996,0.000069706555,0.037490398],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.0009175186,0.00001709896,0.0001203468,0.00016042085,0.00022138815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987435,0.0008493897,0.00007474508,0.00007401094,0.0001500653,0.00010837906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016927272,0.0006383036,0.00038490124,0.001079393,0.024689311,0.0063094418,0.0009371441,0.0024024735,0.0040002307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033821499,0.00028806596,0.00023160205,0.000718089,0.025189769,0.0062532835,0.0039111287,0.005667632,0.00043037633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002572857,0.000009825231,0.00041211947,0.000043274864,0.000002851909,0.00024227692,0.86336607,0.000020119998,0.0002465047,0.12403331,0.0061490857,0.005448843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052525957,0.000032017,0.001613545,0.00038003497,0.000012446162,0.00042216017,0.6813932,0.00012260723,0.000553501,0.021166207,0.2942747,0.00002432313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04658646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09245924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95341355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070532714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027547574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092630565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040961336","doi":"10.1177/1474474011410276","title":"Still searching for the Promised Land: placing women in Bruce Springsteen’s lyrical landscapes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Geographies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Lyrics; The Imaginary; Subject (documents); Ideal (ethics); Reading (process); Aesthetics; Literature; Sociology; History; Art; Law; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.0804184641380169,"score_gpt":0.2590740000917714,"score_spread":0.1786555359537545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040961336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32971543,0.003958601,0.007170244,0.06351031,0.0013757176,0.00005944902,0.00009559154,0.00013770879,0.5939769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93114686,0.0010912959,0.0012702862,0.0022802644,0.00018878977,0.000061284634,0.000032421656,0.000140137,0.0637886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988199,0.0007997724,0.00001223024,0.000063863525,0.00013682799,0.00016742163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917537,0.0005057393,0.000065955974,0.000030845207,0.000065155735,0.00015682023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009859675,0.0005002183,0.00024434717,0.000809492,0.013648167,0.00588144,0.0006922784,0.0015650556,0.0062598833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028686642,0.0002310621,0.00013637583,0.0006541499,0.014750579,0.0047321157,0.003150536,0.0031467867,0.0007881859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034140212,0.000014652384,0.0005249378,0.000044636414,0.0000021125074,0.0008432767,0.82143277,0.00007848607,0.0009879511,0.14907795,0.02037678,0.0065822676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044279263,0.000024218449,0.0006421181,0.00013216163,0.0000035826104,0.00043452196,0.65852433,0.00011703514,0.0005027324,0.009727866,0.32987204,0.0000150001515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01311758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034309015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013648167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003335033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014375938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026082456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046936827","doi":"10.1177/0162243915571166","title":"Discourse Ecology and Knowledge Niches","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology & Human Values","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"Health Canada; Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Certainty; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Public relations; Ecological niche; Perception; Risk perception; Sociology; Political science; Ecology; Epistemology; Geography; Biology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10279553121019995,"score_gpt":0.35449820620108513,"score_spread":0.25170267499088517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046936827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64322585,0.0035786992,0.035660286,0.019126182,0.00021762827,0.00023700317,0.00030991863,0.00021475666,0.29742965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499524,0.000289242,0.002625656,0.00019422604,0.000040459552,0.0000790206,0.000071245595,0.00004143941,0.0016633794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98438835,0.008589233,0.00059077935,0.0018665731,0.0026292254,0.0019359422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672122,0.024579111,0.002194037,0.0015151255,0.00236301,0.002136519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01447833,0.0006266473,0.00085675216,0.013254403,0.015217607,0.01933332,0.0023021663,0.0029427777,0.0068349126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032536853,0.0006438344,0.00063014013,0.007023615,0.04964503,0.017780289,0.012443758,0.0023107359,0.00048271994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055959925,0.000050886923,0.004715362,0.00017037631,0.00001622973,0.00048140355,0.4757751,0.0003076018,0.0008685923,0.50163406,0.0008684225,0.015056094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005156012,0.000043482207,0.005553297,0.00035569802,0.000024133498,0.00041884457,0.62091696,0.001750085,0.00055141834,0.29014793,0.08014443,0.000042222036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017558992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009764893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012042212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00950361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08737278},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2047797848","doi":"10.3138/cras.42.2.123","title":"Rhetorical Insurgents: Biopolitics and the Insurrectionary Rhetoric of McLuhan's Cool Media","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Power (physics); Politics; Rhetorical device; Sociology; Media studies; Literature; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07409242458632671,"score_gpt":0.30677499780382034,"score_spread":0.23268257321749364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047797848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108540826,0.044511296,0.0053200787,0.28551763,0.0025729765,0.000034197576,0.000036123696,0.00008728876,0.5533796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97694355,0.003620889,0.0006836558,0.009417258,0.0007593332,0.000023633036,0.0000064642095,0.000031955282,0.008513238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363965,0.0048662852,0.000058366604,0.0002212128,0.0008754186,0.0003390075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887518,0.008947871,0.0008632393,0.0003193952,0.000803429,0.00031429535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007163443,0.00033985716,0.00025093544,0.0027684092,0.010263074,0.008450081,0.00082785706,0.0028474904,0.0024313545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010521156,0.00016087943,0.00013241722,0.0019948399,0.045698438,0.0071031987,0.0034675223,0.004098514,0.0003114859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001904839,0.000008063881,0.00019013809,0.00010437753,0.0000034181894,0.00013172804,0.07903532,0.000031919375,0.00019134975,0.90276635,0.008978734,0.0085395435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027410153,0.000035663223,0.0016164199,0.0013382809,0.000022566768,0.00036989668,0.11631095,0.00034579946,0.00095206616,0.23936042,0.63958615,0.0000345015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007715774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01234641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010263074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064787106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041386583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047006547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048517242","doi":"10.1080/10646170802391706","title":"Alain Locke on Race and Reciprocity: The Necessity of Epideictic Rhetoric for Cultural Pluralism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Howard Journal of Communications","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Negotiation; Value (mathematics); Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16670451417018145,"score_gpt":0.3321679881977899,"score_spread":0.16546347402760847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048517242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029632553,0.028815018,0.06502546,0.4175234,0.008642333,0.00006367937,0.000030468205,0.00013528718,0.4501317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9038403,0.007203239,0.011594176,0.035806887,0.0058621033,0.00019795129,0.000015693795,0.00021861806,0.035260968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867801,0.010051683,0.00026034957,0.0007093993,0.0017471628,0.0004512367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699839,0.025411472,0.00094979705,0.00097647746,0.0020472659,0.0006311097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012867411,0.00040461475,0.000558067,0.0020748333,0.01004524,0.011848731,0.001187514,0.0049163573,0.0034630285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03509578,0.00030750228,0.00036148456,0.0013142038,0.040303294,0.018982723,0.0063070236,0.008791134,0.00076711725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008327688,0.000004365592,0.00006264438,0.000037588004,0.0000018774476,0.000051740717,0.01571456,0.000036910344,0.000049934544,0.97443,0.0056124404,0.00398966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014373257,0.000024670653,0.00016655894,0.00044492408,0.000008869255,0.00020714622,0.013583855,0.00039595203,0.00036609307,0.68132687,0.30343387,0.000026765494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012167861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012705409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012867411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003334453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003298101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049280132","doi":"10.1258/ce.2009.009014","title":"Why I wrote… <i>The Wounded Storyteller:</i> a recollection of life and ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Ethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Clinical Ethics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Environmental ethics; History; Philosophy; Engineering ethics; Cognitive psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3403338950900555,"score_gpt":0.40567538747011567,"score_spread":0.06534149238006015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049280132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014516864,0.013992283,0.0062281513,0.8521615,0.019075518,0.00005511331,0.000073033945,0.00014358523,0.093754075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5883662,0.0065750885,0.0045731305,0.30172074,0.009052675,0.00019946144,0.00009237849,0.0006973004,0.08872298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789755,0.016979633,0.0004432653,0.00077156076,0.0016380482,0.0011920402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975184,0.01641099,0.0019075782,0.00095276773,0.0030753051,0.0024693501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010344424,0.00090946275,0.0006696854,0.001928584,0.020964524,0.020919083,0.0023236854,0.01264436,0.006337654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04004452,0.00062545936,0.00056675414,0.0012895598,0.06072254,0.015557781,0.00907881,0.03846502,0.002013148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030017605,0.000017597986,0.00029528968,0.00016913145,0.000017593573,0.0011382059,0.47597617,0.000033601005,0.00025364844,0.32342553,0.19267339,0.0059698755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151438935,0.0000196746,0.00024299257,0.00076362886,0.000015874766,0.0022361,0.27403983,0.000111943045,0.00036606865,0.053925585,0.6682138,0.000049405742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072697084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010501923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020964524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009381288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074322056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06806636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053543549","doi":"10.1080/15265160701462335","title":"Limits on Autonomy: Political Meta-Narratives and Health Stories in the Media","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Narrative; Scholarship; Autonomy; Politics; Sociology; Gaze; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.405026195072217,"score_gpt":0.4084370857694991,"score_spread":0.0034108906972821207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053543549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027501427,0.001312971,0.00021799155,0.97974867,0.0009988032,0.0000046895843,0.000016256981,0.000009028427,0.014941461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1276682,0.00275317,0.00045643505,0.84988296,0.005191027,0.00007944339,0.000022755486,0.000057750396,0.013888253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880477,0.00836496,0.00038555768,0.0006683931,0.0016765927,0.00085684797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223319,0.07124037,0.0018919234,0.0011479354,0.0018519469,0.0015359697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012825072,0.00054019847,0.0006282781,0.0010262282,0.015784746,0.017563254,0.0022801894,0.047726855,0.0059797857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05186132,0.000632092,0.00062211754,0.00090768334,0.026200334,0.022765828,0.008559872,0.033809267,0.0014769294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008346644,0.000036254354,0.0009862556,0.00012947127,0.000018214107,0.0024526408,0.115131,0.00011727896,0.00030235553,0.44866976,0.41208038,0.019992925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005512416,0.000031904234,0.0008801648,0.00080319727,0.000018676978,0.0011086501,0.09249882,0.0004365288,0.00041391366,0.21926945,0.6843951,0.00008844793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011249407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022697346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047726855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063716588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048507494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06782627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056224643","doi":"10.1111/jcom.12079","title":"On the Cultural Foundations for Universal Healthcare: Implications From Late 20th-Century U.S. and Canadian Health-Related Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chapel; Health care; Sociology; State (computer science); Media studies; Library science; Social science; Political science; History; Law; Art history","score_opus":0.061713967833799226,"score_gpt":0.3080866527113412,"score_spread":0.246372684877542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056224643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23290293,0.017606568,0.0036877638,0.36054298,0.0014974695,0.00012819245,0.00032405683,0.00006859763,0.38324144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821829,0.003228693,0.001012962,0.008409856,0.00017529601,0.000042946704,0.000044155626,0.00003368406,0.0048694336],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.989237,0.0037074862,0.00031888587,0.00088263606,0.0028482738,0.0030056927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668319,0.01865341,0.0016351682,0.001067265,0.007972572,0.0038397512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01955089,0.00080204924,0.00070071244,0.0060972497,0.03850721,0.01848125,0.002272269,0.004021968,0.0050227367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031334475,0.0005387617,0.00058936974,0.0063130544,0.07658528,0.008009065,0.008296061,0.008039425,0.00022488611],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046262452,0.000018521303,0.0025954698,0.00012078524,0.000010402298,0.00031787698,0.4981447,0.00012427106,0.00018801124,0.48059675,0.0070530954,0.010783931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038795246,0.000023441184,0.011280977,0.0014180625,0.00006683346,0.00021247007,0.7350358,0.000450553,0.00047380978,0.08224562,0.16865607,0.00009764888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9657727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96835953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19049115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19049115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2096212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9389155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056735806","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.14.1.005","title":"Redemption by Grace: A Rhetorical Analysis of <i>Hoosiers</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scapegoating; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Popularity; Perspective (graphical); Sacrifice; Aesthetics; Sociology; Rhetorical device; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Literature; Art; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Theology; Linguistics; Visual arts","score_opus":0.018834811035597726,"score_gpt":0.255408659702706,"score_spread":0.23657384866710826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056735806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59481704,0.0060391836,0.01938256,0.01859493,0.0009639491,0.00015894946,0.00016748461,0.0001643188,0.35971156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823613,0.0012518428,0.0021079741,0.00070458074,0.00023987408,0.000038761333,0.00004092139,0.00008306984,0.013171735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965689,0.0024366681,0.00009657915,0.0001816515,0.00045903822,0.00025717082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894036,0.008383416,0.0011108944,0.00035628476,0.00044357823,0.00030214794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003229054,0.00045130416,0.00036071535,0.002561229,0.007636581,0.0061473055,0.00091120397,0.0020320495,0.0024755346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010409125,0.00030317451,0.0002124299,0.0019305145,0.01627495,0.006091797,0.003359143,0.0034314722,0.0003150471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006230789,0.00002908583,0.0009484917,0.00016877784,0.000008485529,0.0007081222,0.7659794,0.00007474565,0.0014898968,0.21432756,0.004364581,0.011838617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001533182,0.00009485583,0.004630935,0.00061292987,0.000032035907,0.0014138202,0.607994,0.0007653693,0.004858497,0.03045881,0.34907413,0.000049289465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024320371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004821176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007636581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030979395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013058996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02247721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058639677","doi":"10.1080/14484520802628373","title":"‘I Must Know’: Re-membering Native Women in the CAVNET_IW Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Life Writing","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Indigenous; Colonialism; Fourth World; Narrative; Media studies; Amnesty; History; Sexual violence; Historical trauma; Gender studies; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.13918360439974833,"score_gpt":0.28317999745687783,"score_spread":0.1439963930571295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058639677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75623,0.0048248703,0.0010110093,0.15654121,0.005229504,0.00018034407,0.00011677517,0.00019126112,0.075675115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8976517,0.0035502096,0.0011207121,0.043958563,0.0010027668,0.00019029832,0.00012399218,0.00020018837,0.0522016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940346,0.0034765925,0.00010148451,0.0003446182,0.0006983498,0.0013444322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371123,0.0014087014,0.0005129301,0.00029543068,0.000678726,0.0033930007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061279363,0.00059785024,0.00051719334,0.0012473072,0.03350546,0.009936593,0.0024382758,0.0043329354,0.00819945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013210199,0.00068447203,0.00040932998,0.0008853033,0.014118246,0.009922252,0.015217834,0.008650236,0.00155702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022623633,0.000046580375,0.002455988,0.000051215015,0.000004722089,0.0013558087,0.96256846,0.000007407552,0.00022545012,0.0019146964,0.018558485,0.0127885975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029047762,0.000025940677,0.000637326,0.000057495075,0.0000032947805,0.00038026704,0.94457316,0.00001765133,0.00005910784,0.00044556792,0.053785518,0.000011772986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046518777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093791075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046518777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038159618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070908265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09249598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060638714","doi":"10.1177/0002764211419357","title":"Picturing Protest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Behavioral Scientist","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Indigenous; Newspaper; Action (physics); Social movement; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Media studies; State (computer science); Public opinion; Mass media; Political science; Politics; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.14828822957653073,"score_gpt":0.2947496504576732,"score_spread":0.14646142088114247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060638714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095054515,0.0027036346,0.015546277,0.0064403247,0.0025424615,0.00025963222,0.0021991106,0.0009722114,0.8742819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81097376,0.0025003378,0.023036107,0.0013559542,0.0008475038,0.00028592968,0.0014261543,0.0005831292,0.15899125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956805,0.00019733397,0.00001677668,0.00005458413,0.00010453355,0.000058775124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998844,0.00059990754,0.00017036434,0.00016327454,0.00012620573,0.00009613027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005432532,0.0005700331,0.00014213283,0.0024115592,0.0017058298,0.002728001,0.00031791133,0.00077721936,0.046931423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031632232,0.00018063065,0.00031851142,0.0011898391,0.0013482614,0.0022815675,0.0018967459,0.0011659963,0.005127184],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005436565,0.00014683495,0.008106921,0.0013174225,0.000040685405,0.002480954,0.115587704,0.0015486678,0.011244081,0.23989056,0.27861232,0.34048024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014496689,0.00009810696,0.008392366,0.00046053933,0.000017992968,0.0012692219,0.015974749,0.00083156873,0.0023227632,0.006881749,0.96370304,0.000033497232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019343935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046132733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046931423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091287505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004384099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1570012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062548877","doi":"10.1353/esc.2014.0031","title":"Sentimental Readers: The Rise, Fall, and Revival of a Disparaged Rhetoric by Faye Halpern (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Literature; Criticism; Pathos; Appeal; History; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03567574781362149,"score_gpt":0.2553438846142106,"score_spread":0.2196681368005891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062548877","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010438865,0.98423487,0.000027270415,0.011656357,0.0025658482,0.00000617632,0.000011869435,0.0000032264209,0.0013900474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002152063,0.9810053,0.00005375239,0.011550625,0.0031154568,0.00003094064,0.000033971373,0.000006958083,0.002050899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876714,0.0004874263,0.000106842665,0.00010983179,0.0004443903,0.000084531835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959337,0.0020757404,0.0004252768,0.00004752636,0.0012453961,0.0002723989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002001358,0.0006188715,0.0010811852,0.001830609,0.0009930218,0.0037318782,0.0010779703,0.0023174104,0.0043872036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007797577,0.0004441208,0.0004783857,0.0026317027,0.002235597,0.00411055,0.0016558897,0.0043256944,0.002551552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052275704,0.00002166403,0.00033416224,0.01165074,0.00007310774,0.000113882226,0.0018172243,0.00006175947,0.00012934512,0.0038489562,0.7762792,0.2056177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015585294,0.000030121966,0.0014847835,0.026516424,0.000071709925,0.00043869295,0.0019704346,0.000026993433,0.00007816986,0.0011489207,0.96818626,0.00003187299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069556586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0094628595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069556586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021529847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004197928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0156210065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063171179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2013.768352","title":"Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Public discourse; Phenomenon; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.036225289704673175,"score_gpt":0.2649978063844592,"score_spread":0.22877251667978601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063171179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8425878,0.0033069546,0.0044611483,0.043459423,0.0006733303,0.00014643716,0.00005004966,0.000068423804,0.10524641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98102784,0.0013135622,0.0016307076,0.003483474,0.00039116907,0.00007913653,0.000020934107,0.000061603976,0.0119915735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879615,0.009138168,0.00026739496,0.00066435384,0.0010039846,0.0009645815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97755563,0.018148344,0.0013312459,0.0006728637,0.0007577947,0.0015340829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008439751,0.0006337729,0.00077578676,0.0028767884,0.051512882,0.009776806,0.0022223378,0.011543428,0.0032423462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026099814,0.0006366264,0.0005912021,0.003221959,0.027000071,0.006129996,0.007384396,0.008730598,0.00045687502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036078833,0.000082811544,0.0018095156,0.00009012456,0.000006620707,0.020263804,0.9196981,0.000051370578,0.00042268902,0.050112817,0.0029127335,0.004513228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021866445,0.00009507467,0.0021317094,0.0002934637,0.000022620881,0.015072043,0.8481187,0.00034415003,0.0006906189,0.009936877,0.12323693,0.000035970417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012964856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028089395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051512882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007203207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040241117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05226314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065933926","doi":"","title":"Putting theory to practice A critical approach to journalism studies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Compromise; Curriculum; Sociology; Politics; Object (grammar); Meaning (existential); Liberal arts education; Bridge (graph theory); Technical Journalism; The arts; Vocational education; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Social science; Media studies; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.17663791275829607,"score_gpt":0.38892510329153357,"score_spread":0.2122871905332375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065933926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005988036,0.030783394,0.30944616,0.49154532,0.019949745,0.00083873986,0.00011670018,0.0005307109,0.1408012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46078447,0.037799895,0.36117855,0.071753025,0.037146393,0.0046907426,0.0002184607,0.0007538939,0.02567456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9195455,0.06490565,0.0027703657,0.0029655204,0.008188408,0.0016245295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80082744,0.16737634,0.0045677614,0.010160179,0.012230983,0.004837307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07643888,0.0022295944,0.0026011274,0.01617758,0.013626513,0.041817345,0.0073459726,0.014908709,0.0059050755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090683684,0.0010994645,0.0014853758,0.0056172498,0.12494501,0.035883088,0.011436175,0.025536612,0.0017497155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009627503,0.000038106682,0.000091681555,0.00029826918,0.000014851278,0.000113419206,0.014111931,0.0003751602,0.0001112571,0.9655609,0.009894364,0.009380419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014023993,0.000027454005,0.00003815881,0.0005602628,0.0000066067364,0.000057410256,0.0062767346,0.0003883778,0.00017151081,0.9179938,0.07445026,0.000015356083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018051459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015399987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07643888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014563748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015576255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4042523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066876514","doi":"10.3138/sim.4.2.001","title":"The Bush vs. Gore Rhetoric After the 2000 Electoral Impasse: A &lt;i&gt;Ch'i-Shih&lt;/i&gt; Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SIMILE Studies In Media & Information Literacy Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Theology","score_opus":0.019213295858788757,"score_gpt":0.292990303217346,"score_spread":0.2737770073585572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066876514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.536566,0.001971566,0.0024823525,0.01990172,0.000546795,0.00016133949,0.00023199496,0.000049036644,0.43808913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880775,0.00042137443,0.00033824693,0.000953725,0.00020854613,0.000069982765,0.00008154433,0.000044750843,0.009804282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647385,0.0015796665,0.000092905204,0.00022597065,0.0009972204,0.00063036877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807344,0.014860035,0.0015380743,0.00045990138,0.0016703156,0.00073717145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004788054,0.0004352601,0.00047895923,0.0045755147,0.007367119,0.008337336,0.0012007104,0.0025949194,0.010887744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019173805,0.00027686416,0.00042095446,0.0035546888,0.009933863,0.0068889856,0.0040243296,0.0051758736,0.0008170545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043186406,0.00032025643,0.019485578,0.00036955441,0.000043864173,0.0014810745,0.33108193,0.0005282082,0.00080473267,0.5848186,0.016915144,0.043719225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001354031,0.0003670805,0.09769935,0.0007473403,0.00010757754,0.0005820625,0.6370035,0.0042681675,0.00169375,0.07162692,0.18567596,0.00009287757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012365183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013022959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012365183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008463871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003327026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06141001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067689688","doi":"10.1558/lhs.v3i1.3","title":"Breast Cancer Narratives as Public Rhetoric","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Linguistics and the Human Sciences","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Ignorance; Rhetoric; Sociology; Action (physics); Aesthetics; Social function; Media studies; Epistemology; Linguistics; Literature; Social science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11801455150283065,"score_gpt":0.3144287696567645,"score_spread":0.19641421815393384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067689688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26227152,0.01635303,0.01916523,0.07075123,0.0014119013,0.00011508758,0.00025852933,0.0002506554,0.6294228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864726,0.0016617363,0.0014453836,0.00089246704,0.0003832973,0.00005333702,0.00007518785,0.000073783805,0.008942331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903474,0.006865052,0.00029159043,0.0004905998,0.0014432578,0.00056210085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97879034,0.01690091,0.0016914051,0.0010893166,0.0009635199,0.00056443166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009426666,0.00062545965,0.00046639278,0.0041062287,0.0090749385,0.013879239,0.0013099031,0.0034561846,0.004580125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020741887,0.00048373334,0.00038194365,0.0026230859,0.026950853,0.014026874,0.007630239,0.0033270654,0.0006247983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026660251,0.000013754312,0.00050774374,0.000119888384,0.000005813204,0.00042561782,0.34307188,0.00014174008,0.0003809478,0.643943,0.003311064,0.008051966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003888902,0.000048094218,0.00097614434,0.0007634558,0.000027119826,0.0009226137,0.22872637,0.0009410336,0.0014893431,0.29498556,0.47105116,0.000030186164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019509112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015081894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013879239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007920695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031246005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05746895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070815245","doi":"10.1080/02560040903016909","title":"Key concepts in the work of Arnold Shepperson: representing communication and collaboration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Arts","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Cornerstone; Theme (computing); Sociology; Representation (politics); Section (typography); Key (lock); Epistemology; Work (physics); Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Telecommunications; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06957363279071704,"score_gpt":0.3410786016703677,"score_spread":0.27150496887965064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070815245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09049957,0.039881106,0.23644176,0.13508308,0.0019499939,0.00039941262,0.00015181593,0.0003045885,0.49528867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93965167,0.0074257697,0.033151228,0.0023957104,0.00045640807,0.00031220468,0.000035717225,0.000086717606,0.016484503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886354,0.009305073,0.00023618573,0.00050709804,0.0010049632,0.00031129783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841887,0.013206309,0.00064651144,0.0005787418,0.00090251915,0.000477203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00901376,0.0006719012,0.0005490208,0.0031788687,0.008547676,0.011730236,0.00146261,0.00405153,0.0037121524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124596935,0.0003910051,0.00032340133,0.0029178343,0.046481628,0.014928863,0.0056536347,0.0046645845,0.00064329803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013116723,0.000008224558,0.000057953774,0.000077544064,0.0000020297268,0.00011083729,0.05113978,0.00016156748,0.00011185541,0.9419118,0.0019001694,0.004505128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015297543,0.000030115081,0.00018278554,0.0004590935,0.00001181699,0.00043454414,0.0448918,0.0008081946,0.00077554904,0.770049,0.18231514,0.000026663034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028638588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017115233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011730236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051038703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041764155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047669888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072543244","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.071780","title":"Requiem for the sounds of silence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Poetry; Elegy; Reflection (computer programming); Literature; Art; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.045403215584657715,"score_gpt":0.2426404090824806,"score_spread":0.1972371934978229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072543244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016861895,0.0059138876,0.021842225,0.22698191,0.016304905,0.00011669877,0.00017383938,0.0008766902,0.71092796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.626973,0.0028717972,0.010691197,0.048710186,0.0067047644,0.00021520758,0.00016633935,0.00093059044,0.30273697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953275,0.0019732935,0.00016466735,0.00053708506,0.0013808731,0.0006166172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99259686,0.0024238972,0.0005913586,0.0010068071,0.0015648005,0.0018162236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004945308,0.00055081,0.0005321045,0.0006660526,0.011651225,0.0076163,0.00087215647,0.0039586453,0.021805987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022253534,0.00043809277,0.00053142,0.00040493615,0.01732047,0.009060135,0.006986936,0.010183308,0.010997767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015316361,0.000037104175,0.0007420319,0.00016177347,0.00001554398,0.00060282374,0.053289864,0.00007230218,0.0023528677,0.7649587,0.14386901,0.033744715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021501884,0.0000465165,0.0005266302,0.00017283637,0.000012643079,0.00040924802,0.012103765,0.00008224243,0.00065134955,0.08064957,0.90529615,0.00002756724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058460627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007206867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021805987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025913073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00402265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07294822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072692860","doi":"10.13008/2151-2957.1191","title":"Alan G. Gross: Floppy Eared Rhetorical Rabbit, Redux","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poroi","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Redux; Rhetorical question; Rabbit (cipher); Art; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics; Literature","score_opus":0.05802428658277584,"score_gpt":0.24918707152783146,"score_spread":0.19116278494505562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072692860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013155534,0.0741639,0.0035931396,0.647453,0.081054665,0.00003024805,0.00012933192,0.00045531153,0.19180484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066448316,0.040425662,0.0066502024,0.17524274,0.030115264,0.000117108095,0.00015951857,0.00089357723,0.6799477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824214,0.0007706246,0.0000595365,0.00020018956,0.0006047502,0.00012284511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612904,0.0016972726,0.00024794883,0.0002776056,0.0011472066,0.00050093833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024342996,0.00057893316,0.00037985356,0.0015631438,0.0043854876,0.0074046855,0.0009999907,0.0034315065,0.031246457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014394331,0.0003329955,0.00028046488,0.0011665212,0.004349713,0.005971691,0.0025875424,0.0069170357,0.015847363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011806793,0.000004741398,0.00005038994,0.0000732247,0.0000021180063,0.00005854144,0.000779919,0.000013996184,0.00008494862,0.044465516,0.9390437,0.015411191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002073446,0.00000443063,0.00010232461,0.00017551504,0.000002394485,0.00009346316,0.0007670636,0.000030536936,0.0001570114,0.0063833334,0.9922752,0.0000066765206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041539827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008936747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031246457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022972133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019247568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1045298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073532270","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.21.3.001","title":"Happy Holidays: Creating Common Ground in the “War on Christmas”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Common ground; Sociology; Sample (material); Media studies; History; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.03508323129709193,"score_gpt":0.27822838206034023,"score_spread":0.2431451507632483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073532270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31846213,0.0062935245,0.012080884,0.073980324,0.0040512644,0.0000951916,0.00005703753,0.00017483086,0.58480483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811272,0.0005521622,0.000907591,0.0019236519,0.0006811553,0.000025586172,0.000019765845,0.00010272871,0.014660139],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942873,0.0041357675,0.000079459714,0.0003370381,0.0005931752,0.0005671983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994034,0.004170355,0.0005634888,0.0002724706,0.00030401163,0.0006556586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054225386,0.00053891324,0.00040914933,0.0019729282,0.019822923,0.0072434093,0.0012414106,0.0028585491,0.007786594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009768255,0.00042524686,0.00031839393,0.0010349789,0.020530991,0.009099171,0.0100456085,0.005543652,0.000776522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011249008,0.000044725926,0.0011214727,0.00012177377,0.00001605207,0.00074077223,0.5391624,0.00007012687,0.0006302427,0.42381617,0.019328829,0.014834938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035119465,0.00011912916,0.0024840788,0.0003946156,0.00003797682,0.0006175912,0.48961443,0.0004664785,0.0016603586,0.052974723,0.45155063,0.000044830624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048903157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008903604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019822923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038083186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018042851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028677464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075338117","doi":"10.7202/013589ar","title":"Byron and Shelley: Radical Incompatibles","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Poetry; Politics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026085425905705954,"score_gpt":0.20763505163819257,"score_spread":0.18154962573248662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075338117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064268515,0.015234689,0.011494066,0.20280959,0.0053726146,0.0000704562,0.00005339179,0.00014656295,0.7005501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91177964,0.002241739,0.0026830079,0.016676756,0.0014852332,0.0001106278,0.000025475034,0.00019791987,0.06479954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98826724,0.00713705,0.0002564969,0.0012596908,0.0021935818,0.00088587566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149066,0.0054025236,0.0005426165,0.0007237664,0.0012465031,0.00059389207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007175346,0.00065916276,0.00075671874,0.0019236818,0.010993488,0.012358482,0.001063288,0.004655994,0.0060061654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026159512,0.0003416864,0.00038882616,0.0015531124,0.039469104,0.0137143005,0.010117323,0.009021708,0.00093807536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004413466,0.000011094579,0.00012926995,0.000041735002,0.000003706287,0.000115286784,0.035151906,0.00001687551,0.00014311828,0.95031613,0.009401989,0.004624673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003496722,0.00005791737,0.0006731279,0.00036941728,0.00002416972,0.0005494816,0.044133503,0.00028980453,0.00074363506,0.35943648,0.59363496,0.000052546508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052241953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044267112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012358482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004935348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024381133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037947297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077002469","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x","title":"Historical Trends in Questioning Presidents, 1953‐2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":242,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Deference; Presidential system; Assertiveness; Context (archaeology); Political science; Adversarial system; White (mutation); Politics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04610514520876348,"score_gpt":0.2807071089102456,"score_spread":0.23460196370148212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077002469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90981007,0.019960362,0.00060214614,0.0044643106,0.00024131265,0.000057689354,0.0034982024,0.00006208957,0.06130383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840605,0.006288012,0.00034766854,0.0005935546,0.0003443304,0.00003776617,0.0018769715,0.00002556752,0.006425652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805033,0.00041354203,0.00025503582,0.000389397,0.00051778875,0.0003738937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840776,0.0051314044,0.005873419,0.00042167815,0.0033675642,0.0011283606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026877285,0.00022396108,0.00031923188,0.0067583146,0.0018941595,0.0035420305,0.00050871406,0.0010429487,0.0039272755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012795771,0.0003932881,0.00017690564,0.009094933,0.0019297786,0.0025530462,0.0017817562,0.00183913,0.0011118053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064885063,0.00022553193,0.6662187,0.0011087834,0.000108260734,0.000900668,0.09798,0.00053400535,0.0029014135,0.029407015,0.024749694,0.17521702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068280015,0.000099688164,0.8282557,0.00020045324,0.000019578836,0.0003997224,0.012411003,0.00014597226,0.0013626947,0.00042269035,0.15664338,0.000032330045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029231565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054484148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029231565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039089224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009989657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058122873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077690100","doi":"10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.157","title":"Morals, Process and Political Scandals: The Discursive Role of the Royal Commission in the Somalia Affair in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Speech Language and the Law","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Commission; Politics; Somali; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.006771530542384891,"score_gpt":0.24398275257236085,"score_spread":0.23721122202997597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077690100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72697073,0.008244093,0.0021368922,0.046380024,0.0007319589,0.00014037939,0.00040133542,0.00007713083,0.21491748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98702234,0.0020713254,0.00042456068,0.0016260375,0.000040512525,0.00002240331,0.000051236126,0.000042202115,0.008699358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897613,0.0027986923,0.00031955304,0.0008471804,0.004098205,0.0021750764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97860605,0.010181851,0.002024927,0.00049178494,0.0060887914,0.0026065276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077298926,0.0005882686,0.0006402542,0.005220636,0.05996316,0.023817949,0.0022034852,0.0035050337,0.0033081968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01986478,0.0006106936,0.00035227518,0.008963249,0.045501344,0.0049962457,0.0071159042,0.006612122,0.00025694128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022761335,0.000011339623,0.0037672846,0.00012874677,0.000009662318,0.0006133514,0.9541326,0.0001157084,0.00031440688,0.02876387,0.004931348,0.007189022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034066552,0.000007974532,0.006852762,0.00026848458,0.000014552544,0.000104470004,0.89649963,0.00015483107,0.00020330722,0.001504981,0.09433408,0.00005160865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98707944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94003683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20995484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19823883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9163404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079097169","doi":"10.7202/1027777ar","title":"The Cult(ture) of the Second Sun: Remembering, Repeating, and Performing the Past Imperfect1","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sémiotiques","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Semiosis; Forgetting; Parallels; Performativity; Experiential learning; Cult; Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.07250934648651239,"score_gpt":0.28427666692754666,"score_spread":0.21176732044103427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079097169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.281721,0.009188386,0.025210321,0.016348794,0.0018749589,0.00005076022,0.000112869355,0.0002091569,0.6652838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812479,0.00064592506,0.0018959799,0.00021715935,0.00014731973,0.000011299828,0.000020230043,0.000042965723,0.015771179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988949,0.0006508523,0.00003670014,0.00011990074,0.00021184953,0.00008592905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814975,0.0009978093,0.00022246964,0.0003068354,0.0002008382,0.00012226436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018747806,0.0003729254,0.00027928175,0.0013722283,0.0052702557,0.0049019693,0.0005797993,0.001017312,0.00325155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047237757,0.00015159296,0.0002342966,0.00085594103,0.021680487,0.004614528,0.0029083276,0.0016882167,0.00047542452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006020508,0.000011413324,0.0014299947,0.00014053531,0.000007364288,0.0004964061,0.19404344,0.00021025927,0.0009683258,0.7798998,0.0037371314,0.018995216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026845482,0.00022497565,0.006213092,0.00065317756,0.00003807915,0.0020864818,0.13148767,0.001669343,0.003864572,0.23361762,0.62003636,0.00008183862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034967943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064409734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052702557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002141498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012739799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015537679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079357922","doi":"10.1080/07350190802540690","title":"Metis, Metis, Mestiza, Medusa: Rhetorical Bodies across Rhetorical Traditions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Metis; Rhetoric; Sociology; Mainstream; Normative; Subject (documents); Mythology; Epistemology; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Theology","score_opus":0.1326650696711928,"score_gpt":0.3553509111752561,"score_spread":0.2226858415040633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079357922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32557106,0.023376945,0.012549659,0.067213014,0.0013341331,0.00008643372,0.000081365484,0.000098066164,0.56968933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99203485,0.0010878321,0.0006924029,0.00083665934,0.00012543758,0.00002315077,0.000010611049,0.000019967756,0.005169009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997678,0.001529478,0.000070961774,0.00021814281,0.00038845537,0.00011500001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396884,0.0045708716,0.00059349433,0.00025775682,0.0003864469,0.00022257991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046760174,0.0002581602,0.0002987287,0.001814386,0.0060609765,0.008689189,0.00060707907,0.0015175923,0.0026479696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076406114,0.0001901613,0.000105241445,0.0016883775,0.024500124,0.008622054,0.0047185775,0.0025889003,0.00017637174],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023640516,0.000015101142,0.0006659913,0.00011831763,0.00000412884,0.00014472695,0.14673296,0.00005660366,0.00037704644,0.8412989,0.0019521338,0.008610401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038763523,0.00009010589,0.005592135,0.0014319544,0.00003968724,0.0004196958,0.31819618,0.0008648412,0.0017660089,0.37281793,0.298708,0.000034735403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002185982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029792928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008689189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004657833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024971114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03379512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080047571","doi":"10.1080/14616700050081777","title":"Communicative Politics and Public Journalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journalism Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Communicative action; Technical Journalism; Politics; Sociology; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Citizen journalism; Pragmatism; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.14836246524561825,"score_gpt":0.32779360950544595,"score_spread":0.1794311442598277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080047571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038395092,0.019334456,0.031206105,0.26832154,0.0020530343,0.00006110989,0.00006292586,0.00019017482,0.64037555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95921046,0.0052560265,0.003052079,0.011902171,0.0036954605,0.0001665487,0.000034331166,0.00011272764,0.016570253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746456,0.016757535,0.0006320592,0.0014700954,0.0050975075,0.0013972266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94379634,0.04531251,0.00366826,0.0026846472,0.002592925,0.0019453687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018880125,0.0004188871,0.000572936,0.004591723,0.011255329,0.019010449,0.001421357,0.0069755837,0.005814957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034451097,0.00049747375,0.00068513246,0.0032578027,0.054710403,0.013892636,0.007830497,0.006753998,0.0012779532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008045806,0.0000098288265,0.00010065717,0.00003563561,0.000002882736,0.00003943408,0.0051553375,0.00007090747,0.00004756431,0.98985755,0.0016469532,0.0030252738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003283534,0.000019534014,0.00044984053,0.00017170592,0.000009666618,0.00013051268,0.0053934325,0.0003175053,0.00025150258,0.8793801,0.11382493,0.000018479923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020522468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001146651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019010449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008915352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070335716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09984887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081478863","doi":"10.1007/s10503-007-9026-2","title":"Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Chrysler (Canada); University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Communication studies; Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.033501667693689216,"score_gpt":0.2837933877003815,"score_spread":0.25029172000669225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081478863","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096337155,0.004511909,0.44699845,0.03674488,0.00039108584,0.00017843898,0.00013847528,0.00022805961,0.4144715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656173,0.0005599748,0.028266994,0.00067513203,0.00018055334,0.00013210459,0.00005308294,0.00010346852,0.004411425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982117,0.013747896,0.00044039564,0.0012847799,0.0017356799,0.0006742356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567905,0.0353044,0.0017700597,0.003936836,0.0013682202,0.0008299209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013028551,0.00067187974,0.0010022545,0.0025478157,0.004024936,0.016019592,0.0028769514,0.0070636948,0.0071867346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03356143,0.0006856792,0.0008707947,0.0026483715,0.044492017,0.02287185,0.005477599,0.0052370625,0.0006879495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006760398,0.0000079204265,0.000051163268,0.000019993924,0.000004182753,0.000021917898,0.0019727154,0.00026389078,0.000072283525,0.99563956,0.0002784378,0.0016610258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071070713,0.0000033160886,0.000041592888,0.000022934295,0.0000036131996,0.000019248495,0.0005728513,0.001065917,0.000082167535,0.99497294,0.0032042349,0.000004126561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014772213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096970994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016019592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031620446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033008875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06890237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081504411","doi":"10.1353/crv.2006.0003","title":"Uncontainable Metaphor: George F. Kennan's \"X\" Article and Cold War Discourse","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Object (grammar); Meaning (existential); George (robot); Philosophy; Literature; Contradiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Literal and figurative language; Event (particle physics); Conceptual metaphor; Epistemology; Linguistics; History; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.03344482863478348,"score_gpt":0.29601202300726565,"score_spread":0.26256719437248216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081504411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020775493,0.12646388,0.0015558916,0.47780314,0.008514893,0.000021194557,0.00006637257,0.000052009163,0.3647471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68322736,0.03202319,0.0012408472,0.12904051,0.0068459297,0.00012414597,0.000063615735,0.00014113834,0.14729322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969981,0.0020877277,0.00003498644,0.00021474551,0.00037763774,0.0002869674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822,0.0012129477,0.00011652311,0.00008552455,0.00020346425,0.00016156139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026352697,0.00059320504,0.000429523,0.0015113393,0.012400416,0.0056510298,0.0011953607,0.0066988072,0.0040252474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033677537,0.00026769584,0.00025012737,0.0015263807,0.025700964,0.007214599,0.0032735628,0.008208552,0.0006874445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002509898,0.00001756789,0.00012231337,0.000061093706,0.0000034805778,0.0001858767,0.050335627,0.000059108035,0.00016552646,0.7950505,0.14745252,0.00652134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080877635,0.000011509586,0.0005969603,0.0005110612,0.0000039966226,0.00023193278,0.017053362,0.00008493192,0.00016796244,0.06980104,0.9115012,0.000027884975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064614415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0887132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064614415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013838885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00471389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12847662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083334175","doi":"10.7202/007716ar","title":"“When Life Becomes Art” -- on Hemans's “Image in Lava”","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Uncanny; Poetry; Art; Literature; Romance; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04559901709948682,"score_gpt":0.2447893933883003,"score_spread":0.19919037628881348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083334175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056844387,0.003673138,0.0037720068,0.040231686,0.0016447197,0.00002224215,0.000080177764,0.000087854714,0.89364374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8650538,0.0007906879,0.0007531828,0.0036257529,0.00032574506,0.000019973722,0.000038932943,0.000080617174,0.1293113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997117,0.00013632793,0.0000042190454,0.0000374292,0.00006279202,0.00004757321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998574,0.000046579786,0.000011637863,0.000017556,0.00003425883,0.000032512846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034294426,0.00018761093,0.00009582477,0.00032773236,0.0036037844,0.0032724005,0.00033581484,0.00069663353,0.005097675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009533505,0.000052393476,0.000104431696,0.00017083596,0.00907072,0.0026362927,0.0014349923,0.0019718327,0.000936907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003195401,0.0000118427215,0.00037795017,0.000030633957,0.000002398691,0.00019192895,0.043569606,0.00004979072,0.00074347004,0.89602387,0.038537636,0.020428885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072081875,0.000019994653,0.0017334041,0.00012726677,0.0000034231098,0.00030932567,0.027569856,0.00019881318,0.0012231163,0.07417348,0.894622,0.000012155333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00629026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010456383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00629026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022101903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006118684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017053485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092822807","doi":"10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.65","title":"See No Evil, Speak No Evil: White Police Officers' Talk about Race and Affirmative Action","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; White (mutation); Race (biology); Officer; Sociology; Ideology; Racism; Criminology; Action (physics); White supremacy; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04775040852548029,"score_gpt":0.33066976800991843,"score_spread":0.28291935948443814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092822807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72095746,0.0030716842,0.0074141696,0.055411693,0.0011724209,0.00004932121,0.000038665363,0.00007582485,0.21180879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897149,0.0004900048,0.0005577325,0.002193292,0.00019270967,0.00003108003,0.000009262546,0.000046344812,0.0067646466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99176943,0.0066387015,0.00011847395,0.0002508548,0.0007013371,0.0005212516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933577,0.0048963227,0.0008728776,0.00018426377,0.0003095269,0.00037931153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006886438,0.00068697426,0.00032139118,0.0017192455,0.014372719,0.007833985,0.0005296322,0.0028915065,0.0034672208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013400116,0.00056080724,0.0002835774,0.00092510146,0.018404316,0.0075517287,0.0058563286,0.00384382,0.0005887485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068205096,0.000025753017,0.0010198882,0.00004510219,0.000008026625,0.00024739726,0.94437665,0.00002056547,0.0006628452,0.04600045,0.0022620864,0.005262968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027151107,0.00010112865,0.0047829123,0.00036009768,0.000033505854,0.00027042042,0.8815672,0.0002207743,0.0013015273,0.022398368,0.08889165,0.000045298842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062838187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006974563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014372719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018306351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016357243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03641939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094210578","doi":"10.1353/dss.2005.0030","title":"When a Tree Falls, a Bush Grows: Republican Strategy to Elect Jeb Bush","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dissent","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; George (robot); Administration (probate law); Presidential election; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Presidential system; Arctic; Public administration; Economic history; Politics; History; Ecology","score_opus":0.051139999902517726,"score_gpt":0.2685159584181582,"score_spread":0.21737595851564046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094210578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079349704,0.0023164183,0.0015697572,0.57823515,0.0046902075,0.000034317367,0.000032103373,0.000057249224,0.33371496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7724805,0.0012161934,0.00080421404,0.10556507,0.0008909499,0.00004327176,0.00002399424,0.000114443596,0.11886137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972396,0.0017112541,0.000055822922,0.00018018726,0.00026188954,0.00055116427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672854,0.0020563279,0.00018993337,0.00010204721,0.0004293782,0.00049370225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005040447,0.00022541355,0.00019267488,0.00066532334,0.019884733,0.0053773024,0.000732259,0.003716599,0.008213865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008648289,0.00017583778,0.00019372674,0.0006792432,0.006022394,0.004424755,0.0032374419,0.008032834,0.001653229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058473604,0.000060324346,0.0016641837,0.000062246014,0.000012080988,0.0007283059,0.11410744,0.00009200629,0.00093074446,0.45417252,0.39925924,0.02885245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001761798,0.000037095495,0.0017347273,0.00021499314,0.000013122598,0.00026182548,0.14480878,0.00028980692,0.00096263824,0.024300529,0.82732546,0.00003343092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01415972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03683752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019884733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004157868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032769612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03016758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095464362","doi":"10.1080/08900520802222019","title":"‘Killing’ the True Story of First Nations: The Ethics of Constructing a Culture Apart","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mass Media Ethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Journalism; Enlightenment; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Construct (python library); Cultural diversity; Media ethics; Media studies; Environmental ethics; Social science; Gender studies; Epistemology; Anthropology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17634369639676611,"score_gpt":0.31499694049325255,"score_spread":0.13865324409648644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095464362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10595119,0.009966887,0.021845434,0.3699049,0.003936142,0.00010951437,0.000047918948,0.00014363592,0.48809445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579737,0.0011507359,0.0037676159,0.020419741,0.0006030825,0.00011477706,0.00001859631,0.000108212356,0.015843548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96095854,0.034126546,0.00046711974,0.00085885834,0.0021046968,0.0014841269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9450414,0.04569442,0.0015072817,0.0034099119,0.002387812,0.0019592347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02631939,0.0006778076,0.00061889505,0.0017725182,0.025591198,0.02065315,0.0022745922,0.010811638,0.002276202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040457495,0.0005917157,0.00041438013,0.0011570492,0.1255804,0.018681264,0.009892864,0.01767425,0.00049822684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001712245,0.000010472456,0.00026571224,0.000060895698,0.0000056430845,0.00043206464,0.4508727,0.000055658402,0.00015818719,0.5344925,0.009157667,0.0044714212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012521527,0.00002813166,0.00044765323,0.00060982583,0.00001617303,0.00080202194,0.462336,0.0003444629,0.0008476652,0.18972972,0.34478223,0.000043630378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009924735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008324942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02631939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006182651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063002585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13919187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097454728","doi":"10.33776/candb.v4i1.3015","title":"“Through a glass, darkly”: The metaphor of the lens in public discussions about the Canadian Museum for Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada and Beyond A Journal of Canadian Literary and Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Metaphor; Rhetoric; Sociology; Media studies; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Scholarship; Vision; Politics; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; History; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06492808822135711,"score_gpt":0.2534313085110243,"score_spread":0.1885032202896672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097454728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054444104,0.015032381,0.011509297,0.17131077,0.0012921703,0.000096627096,0.00013883086,0.00013630907,0.74603945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685934,0.0020841171,0.002123053,0.0074724415,0.00020031055,0.0000606403,0.000022510749,0.00008105938,0.019362386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991054,0.0055564353,0.000079751815,0.00043142485,0.0016371887,0.0012411783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576426,0.0026273623,0.00024886162,0.00023320556,0.0006593475,0.0004669334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007627123,0.0009185931,0.00052227284,0.004655017,0.0433767,0.015826812,0.0023910508,0.0067425845,0.0060596582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009567136,0.00051171816,0.00055827346,0.004611739,0.11456421,0.012474823,0.0090160305,0.0069160466,0.00038063218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019245885,0.0000057047305,0.00017043733,0.00005213863,0.0000030280148,0.00020192657,0.1885171,0.00006730812,0.00016884378,0.7977808,0.008773529,0.0042399825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032430948,0.000027936596,0.0009189194,0.0007822816,0.000026641048,0.00035117604,0.32039553,0.0004029707,0.00057723874,0.17571059,0.5006878,0.00008651544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7440922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7784871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25590777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07045819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041155353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5148297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098512591","doi":"10.1007/s10708-013-9496-8","title":"Redacted in Nebraska: the noises of conspiracy around nuclear power problems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GeoJournal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Saskatchewan; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Journalism; Certainty; Nuclear power; Denial; Power (physics); Sociology; Government (linguistics); Digital media; News media; Politics; Dystopia; Strict constructionism; Media studies; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03561692451396928,"score_gpt":0.21579515237322297,"score_spread":0.1801782278592537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098512591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4071127,0.0027088348,0.0021656123,0.19824186,0.004180165,0.00004530409,0.000103597115,0.00016810493,0.3852739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639122,0.00047047954,0.0002895717,0.009880555,0.00038780767,0.000024737987,0.000027464286,0.00013869324,0.024868473],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946778,0.0026731256,0.00014286113,0.00043239305,0.0009859261,0.0010879032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9708134,0.022061013,0.0021697467,0.00081944675,0.002328167,0.0018083041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054787393,0.00052868645,0.00044482262,0.0019377475,0.050564785,0.013942023,0.001738549,0.009522733,0.009314108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031363897,0.0005193806,0.00021261066,0.0023633353,0.017118782,0.0065204077,0.0080378475,0.012045458,0.0008317362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014636705,0.00006199853,0.0046880604,0.00016045914,0.000014154534,0.002156737,0.8075345,0.00013843607,0.0014366815,0.10018655,0.063963346,0.01951262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013315296,0.000044600256,0.0049055135,0.00030070095,0.000018259621,0.00026102638,0.6409087,0.00026452474,0.00059227116,0.0066894805,0.34595966,0.000041895823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112763226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22277513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112763226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014672103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110718105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22421372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098669928","doi":"10.7202/015817ar","title":"Cultivating a “Dissenting Frame of Mind”: Radical Education, the Rhetoric of Inquiry, and Anna Barbauld’s Poetry1","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Political radicalism; Rhetoric; Power (physics); Poetry; Aesthetics; Idealism; Sociology; Epistemology; Frame (networking); Philosophy; Literature; Law; Political science; Politics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05025819994587412,"score_gpt":0.2909690669404222,"score_spread":0.24071086699454808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098669928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041636117,0.043952372,0.029012786,0.4863903,0.006972483,0.00008792878,0.000037833244,0.00022420993,0.39168608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91493297,0.004766568,0.011142613,0.02700709,0.0012477065,0.00013066869,0.0000133800895,0.00022190639,0.04053706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878803,0.010237004,0.00012776974,0.00041843302,0.0009813405,0.00035514252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828131,0.014424107,0.0005848605,0.0005507694,0.0008277192,0.0007993623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011968713,0.00054576667,0.00042262732,0.0016645858,0.016249029,0.008707555,0.0014983111,0.0037136888,0.0016344392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015606273,0.00031844157,0.0002052698,0.0007551026,0.085420504,0.006882155,0.0051386575,0.010579589,0.00061795436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021240812,0.000019933012,0.00011580639,0.00006726571,0.0000029411121,0.00019816,0.106374875,0.000092496535,0.00021174425,0.8554418,0.029405039,0.00804874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016443411,0.00003209935,0.00025611697,0.00047440853,0.0000045677643,0.0005212816,0.04979809,0.00043694998,0.0006900316,0.31534338,0.63238406,0.000042601532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057423925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007900931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016249029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066878037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038160272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06329739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102351762","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v2n2p3","title":"A Rhetoric of Cultural Contract","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Negotiation; Dialectic; Identity negotiation; Cultural identity; Rhetoric; Compromise; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.052066468540356556,"score_gpt":0.30771375793944766,"score_spread":0.2556472893990911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102351762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048514996,0.0044455105,0.06396473,0.043526,0.00096808036,0.00010642402,0.00007506827,0.00012404316,0.838275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560013,0.0012397575,0.008426959,0.0031888438,0.0003840412,0.00017434389,0.000039750255,0.00013371426,0.030411234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011225,0.0070345514,0.00019228981,0.00061094423,0.0015070017,0.0005430258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916905,0.0056895493,0.0005732617,0.0007690471,0.00092466694,0.00035288103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008452282,0.00054037664,0.0003983023,0.0025239426,0.011564204,0.0074006002,0.0015975754,0.0032912053,0.0063419407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015295262,0.00029122786,0.0003947658,0.0020650004,0.028197536,0.014034736,0.0058004693,0.004499093,0.00070081797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032115804,0.0000023701627,0.000044388013,0.000010519215,5.739986e-7,0.000043230863,0.0122362105,0.000031016833,0.000036166308,0.9852883,0.0008418852,0.0014620866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018158466,0.000029895167,0.00026543278,0.00032097605,0.0000077372815,0.00035300764,0.028773356,0.001102947,0.0006129064,0.63833994,0.33015537,0.000020340978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004034204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029957884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011564204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069892886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045744004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050711036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104283102","doi":"10.22329/il.v27i2.476","title":"Making it Public: Testimony and Socially Sanctioned Common Grounds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Rhetoric; Individualism; USable; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Public discourse; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.27491929196703513,"score_gpt":0.3082644806043631,"score_spread":0.033345188637327994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104283102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19877425,0.0059505673,0.090136416,0.13952595,0.0012755652,0.00020490699,0.00012206942,0.00021486708,0.5637954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873117,0.00070234167,0.004548738,0.0021365462,0.00025567817,0.000071813854,0.000019693629,0.000048044676,0.0049054343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9463314,0.04325166,0.0012169635,0.0020676153,0.005011583,0.0021207733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9118198,0.07300791,0.0049317875,0.005892978,0.003006733,0.0013407335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030229386,0.00052166363,0.0006167658,0.002918027,0.011708301,0.015229593,0.0020938783,0.009813495,0.0049904417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07435149,0.00057122286,0.00052345626,0.0024446598,0.05996036,0.014854178,0.012016127,0.0073948014,0.0006697084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016530435,0.000019933543,0.00030384285,0.00007812704,0.0000112243115,0.00040521286,0.040516865,0.00020111784,0.00020708528,0.95061725,0.001690015,0.0059327027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041183346,0.00003718924,0.00042317505,0.00043829496,0.00003116281,0.00033232247,0.02556103,0.0010313501,0.0007052635,0.91188204,0.05948647,0.000030550684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002134192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020737823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030229386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044058547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004775261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1598702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108202824","doi":"10.1177/1077800406295625","title":"Social Semiotics and Fieldwork","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Inquiry","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Social semiotics; Sociology; Ethnography; Epistemology; Semiotics of culture; Visual semiotics; Postmodernism; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Qualitative research; Social science; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20724667701267716,"score_gpt":0.40325426052243646,"score_spread":0.1960075835097593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108202824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05465033,0.0197333,0.38665015,0.031964365,0.0016282334,0.0009511972,0.00032159488,0.00028501998,0.50381577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87409997,0.0077095986,0.09086408,0.0018886329,0.0006610254,0.0016454759,0.00021640181,0.00014569795,0.022769134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.969639,0.02617366,0.00076394697,0.0014663782,0.0013710851,0.0005859102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712106,0.023998829,0.0010612918,0.002148961,0.0010061451,0.0005742092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019350331,0.0007285758,0.0009221569,0.0051926905,0.007148361,0.009601781,0.001363667,0.0022329746,0.0054305787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014522095,0.00045328273,0.0005585313,0.0039810673,0.06718608,0.009143168,0.0071252324,0.0024487167,0.00066513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007306302,0.000010238019,0.0001336911,0.00009746345,0.00000309345,0.00008790096,0.033256914,0.0001788541,0.000086004475,0.95920515,0.0006354616,0.006297739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015033373,0.000028122971,0.0002615909,0.000535734,0.0000038680505,0.00022688365,0.03606718,0.0004855821,0.0002850406,0.83434016,0.12773338,0.00001737817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025872618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021226106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019350331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054227444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004985412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10233557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108376675","doi":"10.1177/1741659011433366","title":"Elves, environmentalism, and “eco-terror”: Leaderless resistance and media coverage of the Earth Liberation Front","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Mainstream; Environmentalism; Blame; Ideology; Front (military); Civil disobedience; Resistance (ecology); Political science; Media studies; Terrorism; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Politics; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04166806855540089,"score_gpt":0.25446419411071786,"score_spread":0.21279612555531696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108376675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46484748,0.010903179,0.0016115695,0.107113,0.00095734675,0.000024766598,0.00008612062,0.00005029224,0.41440618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98298126,0.0025437716,0.00015837867,0.005289441,0.00063059,0.000019067918,0.000020800353,0.000035916044,0.008320785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965115,0.0023575313,0.00005776778,0.00018968405,0.0004363224,0.0004472545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914624,0.0063305916,0.0011596227,0.0002942484,0.0003991891,0.0003540419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030854444,0.00046054792,0.00020407196,0.0025073385,0.010095689,0.011729208,0.00077527127,0.0027474405,0.0048109144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006275285,0.0002875186,0.00021476587,0.0014417678,0.023203073,0.010247945,0.005746115,0.0039012325,0.00036750073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079563724,0.00009016198,0.008616326,0.00018528376,0.000019076946,0.0009779318,0.6622766,0.00010955423,0.00061626517,0.28289554,0.020970168,0.023163488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017662249,0.000059474718,0.017069295,0.0007118793,0.000025742771,0.00050959387,0.5993291,0.0003029818,0.0012469457,0.033984967,0.34669265,0.000049635633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082346955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01094367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011729208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034352182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012260758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024924397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108518986","doi":"","title":"History/Popular Culture: A Review of Frost/Nixon, the Book and the Movie","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Nothing; White (mutation); History; Frost (temperature); Conviction; Art history; Novella; Greenwich; Law; Politics; Media studies; Literature; Art; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Meteorology; Geography","score_opus":0.1142720393078326,"score_gpt":0.29999880143030383,"score_spread":0.18572676212247125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108518986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044849366,0.93639404,0.00006549682,0.010869696,0.0027527225,0.000011926719,0.00010049164,0.000010234721,0.045310415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031077081,0.9355,0.00018054464,0.004293207,0.0036402182,0.000045787132,0.00018677505,0.000042930656,0.025033401],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909806,0.00030239418,0.00005728523,0.00010182652,0.0003457233,0.00009466226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984067,0.00082047144,0.00018242994,0.000065273285,0.00033338668,0.0001916786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080669415,0.0007085888,0.00083545444,0.005572622,0.0041321074,0.006995311,0.0007368304,0.0019304096,0.011745408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025872434,0.00053549383,0.00019477971,0.012240041,0.004234106,0.006940672,0.0020767418,0.0023608822,0.0022138455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007915113,0.00013655626,0.00448222,0.005177889,0.000027386423,0.00058765593,0.030250473,0.00008230187,0.00021780691,0.04655876,0.59051365,0.32188606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035651587,0.000019971903,0.008505091,0.0046156766,0.0000066791285,0.00030206627,0.009736467,0.000019660727,0.00003151871,0.00070480636,0.9760454,0.0000090437325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04404789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09143463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04404789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005068386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00412963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087583005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109917548","doi":"10.1080/14608940500201912","title":"Rhetorical Theory and the Critique of National Identity Construction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Identities","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; National identity; Identity (music); Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Politics; Linguistics; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04156175480146074,"score_gpt":0.3122702853450285,"score_spread":0.27070853054356775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109917548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051078156,0.02567379,0.040066354,0.18711345,0.0031008206,0.000041660314,0.00008143286,0.000117704985,0.69272655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765835,0.0033279122,0.0025421625,0.0034202533,0.0015783616,0.00006249173,0.000035335688,0.00008173296,0.01236825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980099,0.015175112,0.00037490547,0.0009042455,0.0028214573,0.00062517956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643962,0.03005888,0.0014038859,0.0012914434,0.002331587,0.0005181183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016430404,0.00076671824,0.00075644185,0.007121813,0.009598131,0.012994833,0.002288218,0.005751419,0.00526588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028889269,0.0003506326,0.00044193192,0.0036429844,0.06150993,0.014296139,0.006690515,0.0066113267,0.00064795255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037738448,0.0000034953955,0.000038395105,0.000030369756,0.0000012144924,0.000025509858,0.006989502,0.000055826684,0.00002255804,0.9896249,0.0015037956,0.0017006703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016610264,0.000013078789,0.00018647294,0.0004791093,0.000006680776,0.00008190374,0.011017438,0.00080683857,0.0003101636,0.8656108,0.12146024,0.000010622217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002917915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020087461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016430404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013985558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051090396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101472795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109999498","doi":"10.7202/009264ar","title":"Ian Balfour. The Rhetoric of Romantic Prophecy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002. ISBN: 0-8047-4506-4. Price: US$27.95.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Romance; Romanticism; History; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Art history; Theology","score_opus":0.034379032886076896,"score_gpt":0.21255415159308347,"score_spread":0.17817511870700659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109999498","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024085627,0.9055909,0.0010454356,0.01858373,0.002831522,0.000020798394,0.0001954476,0.00014986073,0.071341395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010749767,0.7334135,0.002800293,0.0065827346,0.0036338398,0.0000838254,0.00045627376,0.00029946602,0.24198024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902177,0.00027331858,0.000076360455,0.000114472205,0.00042917725,0.00008486999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984333,0.0007709758,0.00016278445,0.00006664064,0.00039521907,0.0001709458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013666553,0.0023883167,0.0013012611,0.0048561823,0.0024332567,0.004522647,0.001592549,0.0032110508,0.06199109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027695075,0.0011453169,0.0006441029,0.0049767434,0.0029253894,0.010865511,0.001998036,0.0045435573,0.0516635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036323636,0.000015723554,0.00012758975,0.0006023426,0.000011211576,0.00007950672,0.0008618278,0.0000703342,0.00011086172,0.015858682,0.89238846,0.08983714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009588476,0.000009371032,0.0006652104,0.0009394664,0.0000107743845,0.00019401929,0.0006573091,0.00005287561,0.00011907808,0.02012853,0.97719586,0.00001785467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013889802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030660562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06199109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002868233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020813567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20738089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112541412","doi":"10.7202/013342ar","title":"The Ribbon and the Rose : Visual Rhetorics Against Violence to Women","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnologies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; White (mutation); Power (physics); Gender studies; Rose (mathematics); Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.02305524233300827,"score_gpt":0.259240790112855,"score_spread":0.23618554777984674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112541412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3978848,0.0106643,0.010467502,0.044685956,0.0015622718,0.00007899337,0.00005526203,0.00016245745,0.53443843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856457,0.0011511387,0.0007807482,0.0014469458,0.00021676438,0.000021979662,0.000010401217,0.00005319522,0.010673105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460113,0.0045069507,0.000041662486,0.00016311632,0.0004077558,0.00027944383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945543,0.0045331446,0.00035278,0.00016360731,0.00020536207,0.00019081337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040108473,0.0005817697,0.00028062938,0.00192892,0.010177316,0.0055131945,0.0006835779,0.0015728837,0.003360144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008377245,0.00023436699,0.00023985008,0.0010312196,0.017258825,0.0033385886,0.0033661805,0.0023832426,0.00035034472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011096588,0.000029884151,0.0010763272,0.0002706992,0.000013366943,0.00065240345,0.6966156,0.00011351948,0.0019872636,0.2588988,0.01118378,0.029047314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000366774,0.00017729276,0.0037782404,0.0011742344,0.000035402936,0.000926114,0.4837652,0.00053662,0.004115462,0.031625446,0.47378516,0.000044082026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007393818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012433564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010177316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034068178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016288606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024718344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113171648","doi":"10.1177/1363459312441009","title":"The moralization of healthy living: Burke’s rhetoric of rebirth and older adults’ accounts of healthy eating","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Healthy eating; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Gerontology; Art; Medicine; Philosophy; Physical activity; Theology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","score_opus":0.08211495195553721,"score_gpt":0.4188157709144246,"score_spread":0.3367008189588874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113171648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5498562,0.01948328,0.018596964,0.14008668,0.0011017424,0.0000689202,0.0000619718,0.000120036166,0.27062425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169755,0.00089183083,0.00057944964,0.0018011647,0.0000544026,0.000013578773,0.0000057553198,0.000025341044,0.0049308958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120295,0.006683671,0.00012372641,0.00029875577,0.0009073734,0.00078351505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960227,0.007874198,0.0006881812,0.00035517188,0.000880452,0.00059976167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106007885,0.00064418855,0.0005104048,0.0021010824,0.019666161,0.009015327,0.0011177517,0.0046563055,0.0019548796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014957283,0.00031138645,0.00030460692,0.0013359057,0.06558289,0.008545817,0.0065690367,0.005935682,0.00025187797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017032318,0.0000060226052,0.0003061632,0.000039818326,0.0000023879104,0.00019089697,0.8930216,0.000040012306,0.00013153681,0.10276605,0.0011274045,0.0023511057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147569635,0.000029075525,0.0011537541,0.0004195421,0.0000138846235,0.0004126729,0.78847575,0.00029315238,0.00048539456,0.048277598,0.1603779,0.000046478377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12060136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10526983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12060136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01629468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072245784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23979878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114270624","doi":"10.1177/016059760703100205","title":"A Response to Michael Mayerfeld Bell's “In the River: A Socio-Historical Account of Dialogue and Diaspora”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanity & Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Recreation; Diaspora; National park; General partnership; Sociology; Dislocation; Geography; History; Gender studies; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.05790800230598262,"score_gpt":0.2693402327341149,"score_spread":0.21143223042813228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114270624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005582099,0.007478273,0.0015475929,0.9624839,0.0030125803,0.000016536245,0.00002708655,0.000030986484,0.019820997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.381061,0.012561819,0.0029173193,0.53679067,0.008113826,0.00027815814,0.00006297961,0.0002495056,0.057964735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946964,0.0036206522,0.00009697785,0.0004113085,0.0005851062,0.0005895707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993601,0.004299829,0.00059730717,0.00013744106,0.0005618507,0.00080258667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059962417,0.00085565646,0.0007030465,0.0013618486,0.015718058,0.010619665,0.0035053638,0.014821341,0.007199198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011592192,0.00043669142,0.0003990731,0.0022236335,0.026793743,0.016508888,0.0086890245,0.0184474,0.00093342544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036816036,0.000022234344,0.00048977736,0.00012854619,0.0000069528064,0.00086823024,0.14775181,0.0000899957,0.00022980398,0.50049335,0.3434114,0.0064711226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009764236,0.000027156577,0.00075035903,0.00074136036,0.000009604168,0.00069855095,0.18846196,0.00019282964,0.00024903004,0.069979034,0.7388312,0.000049158683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024260618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059582908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024260618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065917606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035726402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048238814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117081349","doi":"10.7146/se.v1i1.4169","title":"The Word and the Sound: The Sonic Color-line in Frederick Douglass's 1845 Narrative","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SoundEffects - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Sound and Sound Experience","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Binghamton University; Frederick Douglass Institute for African and African-American Studies, University of Rochester; Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","keywords":"Narrative; Spectacle; Active listening; Sound (geography); White (mutation); Color line; Key (lock); History; Reading (process); Literature; Linguistics; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Art; Media studies; Race (biology); Psychology; Sociology; Communication; Computer science; Acoustics; Philosophy; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05339233506113212,"score_gpt":0.31576906599859456,"score_spread":0.26237673093746244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117081349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3778458,0.0101494985,0.0033873518,0.01556531,0.0009244878,0.00003376444,0.00022022123,0.00008432649,0.5917893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93593585,0.00084776344,0.00036374535,0.0006769859,0.00004740396,0.00000950587,0.000024288238,0.00002648037,0.062067844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938154,0.0003390162,0.000011201046,0.000048347392,0.000103405735,0.000116446055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971956,0.00015363136,0.000031952586,0.0000137256475,0.000032363194,0.00004867246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007627837,0.00035126763,0.00012078916,0.00077211024,0.00899013,0.003596756,0.00035619608,0.0010192663,0.004000246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00168456,0.00016146294,0.000103451544,0.000597697,0.010782258,0.0015908608,0.0014307663,0.001244035,0.00047757747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056350156,0.000011085045,0.0010402827,0.00007830849,0.0000032253477,0.0006561306,0.65378684,0.00012493413,0.0005247278,0.29774797,0.0302866,0.015683606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069984894,0.000019852847,0.0031685361,0.00025855118,0.000005796802,0.00053017423,0.240692,0.000077999335,0.0006434749,0.009273951,0.74530065,0.000021888422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07609695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1575972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07609695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009041185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018584101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15130806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117710448","doi":"10.7202/006531ar","title":"Green Organizing in Austin, Texas","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnologies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Corporation; Software deployment; Politics; Sociology; Capital (architecture); Media studies; Political science; Public relations; Visual arts; Art; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.09577511307141617,"score_gpt":0.2804728351932951,"score_spread":0.1846977221218789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117710448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42073116,0.002208966,0.0007608,0.015871882,0.00033538902,0.000047745623,0.00013762186,0.000086974665,0.5598194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81623906,0.0011314434,0.00055933755,0.0012746699,0.0001303186,0.000049043483,0.000096261785,0.00004745576,0.18047237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954814,0.000116312294,0.00000679922,0.000045942186,0.000060054976,0.00022267851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996061,0.00007881649,0.000059353493,0.000030616786,0.000045517227,0.00017969224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057886774,0.00016653222,0.00009618107,0.0006652181,0.01946531,0.005212606,0.0005038588,0.0008786333,0.018505193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000412745,0.00011945451,0.00012242018,0.0014125784,0.003243516,0.0010051583,0.003443753,0.0010853796,0.00069569505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021856253,0.0002116202,0.015805222,0.00022494941,0.000020218078,0.0072216825,0.31545234,0.0013797292,0.00328617,0.38751748,0.13690382,0.13175821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006765778,0.000040561503,0.016032774,0.00008846968,0.0000061035284,0.00022911688,0.12461337,0.00013170822,0.00042615837,0.0058356924,0.8525754,0.000013858149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05328389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15666203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05328389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077010314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057305866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105947495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118376598","doi":"","title":"Canadian public space, racialized minorities and the media : exploring coverage of Dr. Sunera Thobani's October 1st, 2001 speech","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Media studies; Public space; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Linguistics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04954645680246223,"score_gpt":0.22105061075024635,"score_spread":0.17150415394778412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118376598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14103727,0.030416457,0.00049886963,0.32676145,0.0050733597,0.00012807903,0.0005798236,0.000085275184,0.4954194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8021464,0.020788215,0.00053427194,0.031976167,0.0011836359,0.00009389431,0.00018007577,0.00014840387,0.142949],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971517,0.00056244334,0.000038295526,0.0001838627,0.0012167526,0.00084696786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536175,0.0020582273,0.00018709774,0.00008373187,0.001408928,0.0009002746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036799193,0.0005740941,0.00045633962,0.0029931748,0.05483638,0.009469638,0.0018965536,0.003586212,0.010588532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008103122,0.00029589335,0.00020587113,0.004844359,0.011265973,0.0020055922,0.003522143,0.005685505,0.00070511224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043369535,0.000036548896,0.002230367,0.00025779166,0.000010265744,0.00088920136,0.5784545,0.00009782409,0.00076591223,0.07274043,0.31246895,0.03200482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005592736,0.000012608943,0.0044057895,0.0004071708,0.000013293577,0.00009067477,0.31067872,0.00005769237,0.00031430146,0.0011265544,0.68285704,0.000030575386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10717313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10717313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11712342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7775991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119583573","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i4.4079","title":"The Virtues of Reason and the Problem of Other Minds: Reflections on Argumentation in a New Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Analogy; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Modernity; Sociology; Cognition; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.050331563233670294,"score_gpt":0.27744907201247676,"score_spread":0.22711750877880646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119583573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08145081,0.04910752,0.037335373,0.21462944,0.0022270738,0.000056666435,0.000036509602,0.00008455288,0.6150721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96432805,0.0061898385,0.0051264176,0.0067566796,0.0011885912,0.00006918503,0.000014748757,0.000091191774,0.016235296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98913175,0.008350523,0.00025333965,0.0005497175,0.001106244,0.00060833676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97886765,0.01859076,0.0006688949,0.0006834613,0.00064992224,0.00053929875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0128625175,0.0004982373,0.00074886816,0.002759325,0.011909,0.017218651,0.0018586806,0.011360766,0.0031289759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012599789,0.0003880071,0.0006731908,0.0019352048,0.10226362,0.020572769,0.006821978,0.011109837,0.0005343879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008044552,0.000013544282,0.00005493785,0.000030121377,0.000002597441,0.000099186866,0.042149696,0.00007065551,0.000045229834,0.9543205,0.0010330128,0.0021724456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000227842,0.000013409528,0.00015261422,0.00024508292,0.0000037787474,0.0001873617,0.01803027,0.000311592,0.000095034535,0.85955864,0.12136432,0.000015108173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032688954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036653695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017218651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009996227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038530072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072528005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121448625","doi":"10.1080/10570310209374738","title":"Rhetorical criticism as limit work","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Criticism; Identity (music); Epistemology; Rhetorical criticism; Limit (mathematics); Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Philosophy; Rhetorical device; Rhetoric; Work (physics); Aesthetics; Literature; Law; Linguistics; Art; Political science; Physics; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.1284568531266073,"score_gpt":0.2880536899781293,"score_spread":0.159596836851522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121448625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05671859,0.015605767,0.1182651,0.09862589,0.001833335,0.00008485585,0.000044569224,0.00030309326,0.7085188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712488,0.001558326,0.0066871396,0.0034303633,0.00084721204,0.0001197999,0.000014785689,0.00013931267,0.015954329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397577,0.011582926,0.00031845045,0.00085222645,0.0025914686,0.000679061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751608,0.020217508,0.00094141625,0.0015873278,0.0017441416,0.000348816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014509776,0.000586088,0.0007543392,0.0033413759,0.009533006,0.012557325,0.001534953,0.0056749485,0.0027340231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025775548,0.00037631023,0.00055898534,0.0016564833,0.07806214,0.014358069,0.006559751,0.00595132,0.0005614688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026430532,0.0000022364356,0.000030941275,0.000011691495,0.0000011713678,0.000029417743,0.005099025,0.000055348544,0.000029932939,0.9926805,0.00060254225,0.0014544219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008057784,0.000007182451,0.000048811005,0.00008206878,0.0000030730903,0.00006899629,0.002288328,0.0004472634,0.00020350724,0.94764674,0.04918822,0.000007640693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022552921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001393006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014509776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009097563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036260777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07673597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123117886","doi":"10.1353/crv.0.0019","title":"Death and the Maidens: Vancouver’s Missing Women, the Montreal Massacre, and Commemoration’s Blind Spots","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blind spot; History; Art; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.07069073935111737,"score_gpt":0.2801077491449512,"score_spread":0.20941700979383382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123117886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8533054,0.008308662,0.000707783,0.03330799,0.0012469074,0.00004857102,0.0002892407,0.000051001214,0.102734484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96691227,0.0020575372,0.00018735537,0.0013130098,0.00011883562,0.000020765194,0.000076773395,0.000026632237,0.029286833],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855345,0.0004884869,0.000022678445,0.000101504644,0.00034337305,0.00049040763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825937,0.0003521084,0.00020482283,0.00008035678,0.0004100977,0.00069329806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014803,0.00061037496,0.00033209386,0.0011394834,0.031155227,0.0069625885,0.0015177506,0.0018565878,0.005703132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038909174,0.0003375795,0.0001625438,0.0016382086,0.015279778,0.0019141709,0.005950288,0.0035423858,0.00031702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066312314,0.000021715274,0.0062449696,0.00012507007,0.000015726268,0.001574644,0.9332204,0.000109008804,0.0004012588,0.016533807,0.023955282,0.017731901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003285473,0.00002164301,0.006723264,0.0001377485,0.0000079263045,0.00026106567,0.8726478,0.000031867854,0.00019589216,0.0006616918,0.11928221,0.000025582278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.831384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9517938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.168616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023797963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016109372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33921796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123683357","doi":"10.1525/si.2008.31.2.155","title":"A Queen's Drowning: Material Culture, Drama, and the Performance of a Technological Accident","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symbolic Interaction","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Drama; Ethnography; Redress; Queen (butterfly); Accident (philosophy); Sociology; Sympathy; Citizen journalism; Personhood; Agency (philosophy); Aesthetics; History; Media studies; Art; Visual arts; Law; Literature; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Anthropology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02577887183133014,"score_gpt":0.24160312501376607,"score_spread":0.21582425318243592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123683357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747677,0.00048751902,0.00045382784,0.0013708499,0.00003315701,0.000016441343,0.000027365091,0.000013245077,0.022829965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522287,0.00036902376,0.00018523722,0.00015572541,0.000009953892,0.00001576716,0.000020643183,0.0000122968095,0.0040085376],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982809,0.0009500444,0.000041576364,0.0001075687,0.0003283898,0.00029162117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979996,0.0011810281,0.00032432773,0.0001269422,0.00015333605,0.00021479013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014398586,0.0004526359,0.00038407985,0.0013105664,0.015903482,0.006340054,0.0012415656,0.0011030571,0.0025435924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043485174,0.0002610967,0.00013409497,0.0015811484,0.016661843,0.0015522284,0.004379121,0.002304408,0.00022678504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017349088,0.00001949766,0.0038238787,0.00004363982,0.000004231505,0.0005531217,0.98677945,0.00004700113,0.00053674483,0.0027006557,0.0010540674,0.0044204793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010346441,0.000011059689,0.0061329827,0.00004085396,0.0000030631677,0.0001260763,0.98390627,0.000040055904,0.0001440713,0.00020217997,0.009384183,0.000008082973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2622647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50799197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077524846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044253473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52147627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125435113","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2011.0003","title":"Violence and the Radical Imagination","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political radicalism; Immediacy; Rhetoric; Politics; Injustice; Sociology; Solidarity; Aesthetics; Retributive justice; Sympathy; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.049085248915469865,"score_gpt":0.24708801767284766,"score_spread":0.1980027687573778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125435113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09055076,0.055400718,0.0053093755,0.09775461,0.0017754543,0.000019023917,0.000026279306,0.000036739424,0.7491271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97272205,0.0051724073,0.000447728,0.0030927206,0.00074743945,0.000016725826,0.0000071625545,0.000026273046,0.017767513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488103,0.0036797132,0.000067738816,0.00029054598,0.0007600187,0.00032098827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954129,0.0035113876,0.0003454485,0.00025934138,0.00026854442,0.0002024458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004091045,0.00030969238,0.00026085685,0.0017496455,0.0060979547,0.00782545,0.0006146195,0.002214014,0.002437216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005580105,0.0001455057,0.00013804265,0.0007974356,0.043442003,0.004310306,0.0040651537,0.0034815858,0.0003860393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006505854,0.000005086173,0.00008776414,0.000043046675,0.0000018432759,0.000065858425,0.040172543,0.000029164781,0.0001027181,0.95227766,0.0026865138,0.004521226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002106092,0.000030511706,0.00050304225,0.00046689186,0.000006795673,0.00023951838,0.04112365,0.00012537593,0.00046142755,0.4570134,0.49999493,0.00001339794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023685014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022937604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00782545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046992176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022432192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034095347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125627596","doi":"","title":"Rhetorical Leadership in Framing a Supportive Social Climate for Educational Reforms Assisting Children with Disabilities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Rhetorical question; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.1641326111905298,"score_gpt":0.30189611709811404,"score_spread":0.13776350590758424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125627596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022551075,0.004177094,0.005616592,0.504821,0.0032999194,0.000096219446,0.000032613054,0.00012994005,0.45927554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86709803,0.0016539567,0.0026812786,0.077202015,0.0010443833,0.00013631389,0.000026040065,0.0001826994,0.049975235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849434,0.009042089,0.00018999277,0.0007117758,0.0025032023,0.0026096234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889002,0.006019433,0.00055360596,0.0002506838,0.0019577262,0.002318381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01373752,0.0006075974,0.00037397703,0.002489962,0.05251361,0.01645806,0.0025758236,0.011127783,0.0053063883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015352462,0.00042481616,0.00034203692,0.0015420177,0.06714843,0.0065168934,0.009860618,0.015168813,0.00071813277],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012138366,0.000022213397,0.000400434,0.00005540682,0.0000037930877,0.0003184867,0.13103488,0.000120131794,0.00012859506,0.8071078,0.05400824,0.006787903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024810817,0.000023631157,0.0006606477,0.00040030107,0.000011798683,0.00012452633,0.11620787,0.00027797162,0.00022684818,0.08191594,0.80008024,0.000045368513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47499052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66848123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47499052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072105885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06881503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9444515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130886370","doi":"","title":"A Draft for Asinabka","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Artexte (Artexte)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); History; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Media studies; Literature; Art; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.15454195491029055,"score_gpt":0.29370870319245046,"score_spread":0.1391667482821599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130886370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014799604,0.009624423,0.003686596,0.06568252,0.11862395,0.0007693333,0.0074843015,0.0015570747,0.7910919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004722246,0.0017374442,0.0013941809,0.005538745,0.0029224486,0.0002894702,0.0021861885,0.000850365,0.98035896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983016,0.00041772914,0.00011767645,0.0003063619,0.00067127985,0.00018526192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603325,0.00047485277,0.00011178278,0.0004981793,0.0024333755,0.00044857088],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024279947,0.00065561134,0.00064756116,0.0018260195,0.0042220503,0.008321116,0.0011320043,0.0023175385,0.54325104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009917579,0.00042067468,0.0006088699,0.0014444834,0.0011696729,0.0046062474,0.0030145908,0.0037913297,0.36519876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030867566,0.00001620982,0.00006983506,0.00009023118,0.0000026931993,0.000044457945,0.00019161185,0.00002678802,0.00012305884,0.01158049,0.95832306,0.029500814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002071284,0.0000025262575,0.00009147605,0.000050697417,7.449983e-7,0.000013090743,0.00009432079,0.000008561669,0.000023488199,0.00072910875,0.99898154,0.0000023472714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058737523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009955327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54325104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031074912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004281728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65149695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131916307","doi":"10.1111/1467-7660.00239","title":"Conservation Narratives in Costa Rica: Conflict and Co‐existence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioprospecting; Narrative; Nature Conservation; Tourism; Narrative inquiry; Political science; Wildlife; Environmental ethics; Geography; Sociology; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.28793549031308713,"score_gpt":0.27972520360732583,"score_spread":0.008210286705761294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131916307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8213544,0.01351761,0.0027810936,0.03391418,0.00018662344,0.00007264522,0.000079976606,0.000035065306,0.12805839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558794,0.0015074373,0.00037932076,0.0004899994,0.000030324121,0.0000288663,0.000017194103,0.000009637881,0.0019492449],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945949,0.0042244764,0.00013597427,0.00022310234,0.00047497585,0.00034655488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929837,0.0045394516,0.0011895087,0.00040348253,0.00049364433,0.00039022707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068456354,0.00033868774,0.0003488486,0.0028771167,0.013548282,0.007526159,0.0011013446,0.0015460389,0.0021453847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100135235,0.00029337592,0.00018323935,0.0040616207,0.018339023,0.0058739698,0.009681259,0.002152197,0.00013182145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014894239,0.00000845425,0.0027413801,0.000091301285,0.0000071437166,0.0005444567,0.9391607,0.0001062687,0.00018924761,0.045731764,0.0014798972,0.009924447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007122676,0.000013306187,0.008077129,0.0004925769,0.000012712604,0.0005609896,0.86083657,0.00043915908,0.00027331326,0.011618455,0.11764441,0.000024149234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041159842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052696344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041159842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00894743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004685739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081840515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132434063","doi":"10.3167/bhs.2015.080103","title":"No Future for Boys?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boyhood Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Rhetorical question; Temporality; Declaration; Politics; Raising (metalworking); Gender studies; Work (physics); Software deployment; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Engineering; Epistemology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.22367881449936888,"score_gpt":0.33423319015496755,"score_spread":0.11055437565559867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132434063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033240173,0.020894349,0.005420671,0.41340858,0.011387644,0.000040877818,0.000105489395,0.00011646551,0.5153858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7359087,0.006745781,0.002058329,0.04187481,0.0032208634,0.000070887676,0.00005969113,0.0001656107,0.20989525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959286,0.002843995,0.000066443296,0.00035942535,0.00044560878,0.00035596077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969957,0.0012909126,0.0004242287,0.0001881902,0.00041680352,0.0006842027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039993054,0.000548951,0.00032001684,0.0007104906,0.0091718715,0.0050317263,0.00071590755,0.0026541715,0.0142343035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074556484,0.0001596491,0.00028158375,0.00036271854,0.01401097,0.007834726,0.0039569163,0.0061821644,0.0029889657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029491543,0.000017114116,0.0009320673,0.000121510646,0.000009410201,0.0002958988,0.0949861,0.000043261174,0.0002914358,0.8221008,0.06157646,0.019596476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074877757,0.00005046396,0.0005231887,0.00037925312,0.000009517202,0.0003421279,0.06361342,0.00006166844,0.00037953624,0.03931408,0.89530647,0.0000128393485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026766798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044690776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0142343035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002813196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020210335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04761851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133491810","doi":"10.5539/ells.v3n1p122","title":"Exporting Democracy and Liberating Women: An Examination of a Debilitating Rhetoric","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language and Literature Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Hegemony; Style (visual arts); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Gender studies; Law; History; Medicine; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01755683671009676,"score_gpt":0.258563420576312,"score_spread":0.24100658386621523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133491810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32117456,0.026133783,0.009357145,0.073086105,0.00088273844,0.00008934378,0.000032379932,0.00003344945,0.56921047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818813,0.0048512775,0.0009086114,0.0029959336,0.0002675194,0.000039430706,0.000009452321,0.000032808763,0.009013588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927125,0.005774742,0.00011605716,0.00024349592,0.0007064095,0.00044677313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857465,0.012803392,0.0005942008,0.00019624033,0.00047459398,0.0001849955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008227891,0.00043020837,0.00045686928,0.0032395797,0.008773111,0.009129035,0.000749795,0.0020452265,0.0028382149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008717485,0.0001757905,0.00027329713,0.0028189016,0.03665525,0.008050156,0.0054401625,0.0034391056,0.00024022725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025256899,0.000023834793,0.00095473975,0.000244567,0.00000473999,0.00040338456,0.4864281,0.000049198377,0.0003215863,0.4966803,0.0017910866,0.013073095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023418874,0.00008125576,0.0029409276,0.0015278133,0.000024244993,0.00057211285,0.61457515,0.000391147,0.0010088772,0.10312248,0.27571148,0.00002111053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033780378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045931987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009129035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060293744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035287298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043746352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133685160","doi":"10.11575/prism/30281","title":"A Collusion of Treasured Tweeds: The TransforMitt Compendium","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Compendium; Collusion; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; History; World Wide Web; Business; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.17189643440922178,"score_gpt":0.3173000713361339,"score_spread":0.14540363692691213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133685160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3344475,0.006602829,0.031797867,0.06094549,0.007775791,0.0003809113,0.0033135235,0.0012486916,0.55348754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902218,0.0020001982,0.013170909,0.0032599277,0.002277985,0.00023453859,0.0021915454,0.0012123357,0.0854308],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481404,0.0025305208,0.00025076055,0.00046421206,0.001558469,0.00038199284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97619766,0.014841379,0.0018719758,0.0032655748,0.0022919003,0.0015314809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00586322,0.0004322518,0.0003312325,0.004591204,0.00843238,0.010026142,0.0009855743,0.0015484381,0.009746987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029182818,0.00046975477,0.00025148081,0.00455829,0.0053054346,0.008056122,0.0077499324,0.0030162525,0.0025983576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033243737,0.000078879624,0.011253359,0.00053920737,0.00004915022,0.0025505829,0.3239104,0.0003690356,0.007545735,0.23975532,0.17828332,0.23533264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009192191,0.000049223443,0.005435525,0.00036959047,0.000016944216,0.0007910913,0.048228838,0.0009997328,0.002019034,0.017437046,0.92458457,0.000059105038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027147324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009739028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010026142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022133696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001968805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03260696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142170683","doi":"","title":"Part 10. Persuasion.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Frond; Art; Art history; Philosophy; Biology; Botany; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2543692948336172,"score_gpt":0.2094434622788038,"score_spread":0.04492583255481339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142170683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004168044,0.01547272,0.0016478034,0.011442528,0.0019501742,0.00007394589,0.00033685658,0.00018658946,0.96847254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04653207,0.018137196,0.002026046,0.009870285,0.0038901288,0.00037459072,0.0006282608,0.00028262247,0.9182588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971488,0.0008292176,0.00015400472,0.00036284508,0.0011810852,0.00032404874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967444,0.0015377338,0.00021782379,0.00038750865,0.0008459988,0.00026658617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024147043,0.0010740719,0.00054216845,0.002549651,0.0026031567,0.006734446,0.0013641196,0.005810027,0.20527868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063996115,0.00043242367,0.000868664,0.0018791882,0.0041939034,0.0050083306,0.0025562358,0.003980727,0.105369546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034976812,0.00008102495,0.0002082047,0.00042253613,0.00000901922,0.00010048132,0.0014342306,0.000105520565,0.0001653303,0.4710692,0.43967202,0.08669743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007755731,0.000020141752,0.0006063529,0.00032686105,0.000004053956,0.0001518738,0.00023207888,0.00004351116,0.00012581922,0.049442254,0.94903183,0.0000073815095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038522517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031570315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20527868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033673486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027912026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6867256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151412802","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905050080","title":"Dialogue and Public Space: An Exploration of Radio and Information Communications Technologies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; The Internet; Public sphere; Political science; Assertion; Public space; Information and Communications Technology; Space (punctuation); Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Humanities; Telecommunications; Engineering; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.1030696502369298,"score_gpt":0.2835349872597338,"score_spread":0.180465337022804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151412802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11597453,0.031625986,0.014105457,0.035914954,0.0005491233,0.00013957664,0.00013214296,0.00009412929,0.80146414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97434366,0.0065896986,0.0015990376,0.0011791143,0.00021863975,0.00010027303,0.00002687734,0.00004635156,0.015896402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395317,0.0047637247,0.000055411736,0.00020094281,0.0004887812,0.0005379109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920449,0.006938351,0.00025976173,0.00013215342,0.00026181078,0.00036292334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004467941,0.0005159963,0.00042053833,0.0033052845,0.009238165,0.020200098,0.0012786875,0.0032228597,0.009184616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040517547,0.00028590855,0.000530897,0.004066179,0.02895792,0.013259968,0.007065153,0.0028665317,0.00057358795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037278147,0.000043624572,0.00074094854,0.00034724674,0.000009132633,0.00058853475,0.26741263,0.0003146517,0.00026464774,0.7101459,0.00310637,0.016989134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003203925,0.00007084092,0.001978523,0.0008001564,0.000019383444,0.0006588086,0.5070321,0.0011446286,0.00028847018,0.11431972,0.3736199,0.00003548868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018286115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015872912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010276679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074675954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07456285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151484440","doi":"10.1177/1750698014558658","title":"Poetry as monument: Jenny Holzer and the memorial poems of 9/11","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Popularity; Scrolling; Meaning (existential); Literature; Mandate; History; Art history; Art; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.059501719362555994,"score_gpt":0.28092106097869085,"score_spread":0.22141934161613486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151484440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2989602,0.017597686,0.00547549,0.09569423,0.0044554854,0.000052896292,0.00007595391,0.00022298691,0.5774651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86367774,0.0034275362,0.00098011,0.0027280431,0.0008766333,0.000027384383,0.000020373453,0.00012378124,0.12813853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995677,0.00022825645,0.0000076210313,0.00003853154,0.000088685316,0.00006923491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938893,0.00036659808,0.00006962607,0.000039360235,0.00005012596,0.00008539393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076779927,0.00025471798,0.00015132621,0.00053141976,0.0062810206,0.0040266737,0.00039192202,0.00084855326,0.0043233167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023139336,0.00015223409,0.00010116196,0.00044713853,0.0097438535,0.0042250524,0.002752945,0.003168165,0.0006376535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012776336,0.00006561276,0.0010549875,0.0001907071,0.000007753575,0.0010322569,0.38565555,0.0001598517,0.001427117,0.45250392,0.119027145,0.038747363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011870452,0.000061689636,0.0019084787,0.00018518674,0.00001124397,0.0006885965,0.13073729,0.0001274727,0.0015058183,0.02106163,0.84368014,0.000020486179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002947848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008393361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062810206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013570937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007078454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014462888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153679170","doi":"10.1177/016344301023005006","title":"Céline Dion, national unity and the English-language press in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Media Culture & Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"National Unity; Politics; Political science; French; Frame (networking); Media studies; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02327862183021417,"score_gpt":0.2203445155662331,"score_spread":0.19706589373601893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153679170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25650364,0.05574529,0.00070520793,0.22633526,0.0013183069,0.00003776973,0.00043635326,0.00009507106,0.4588231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650388,0.0064820717,0.00016062647,0.0046542305,0.00019644007,0.000009869034,0.000053355925,0.00003176768,0.023372853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980769,0.00039698347,0.000039790088,0.0001451988,0.0007036113,0.0006375327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935189,0.0033916696,0.00044761138,0.00010979424,0.0016020525,0.00092999486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018045178,0.00028330527,0.00030692355,0.0034409203,0.026275832,0.014328469,0.00097062223,0.0025583592,0.005645315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068201683,0.00024999553,0.00013170196,0.0046882504,0.012726356,0.0033265043,0.0023871288,0.0029202506,0.0002755225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017619731,0.00005082905,0.012948041,0.00050560845,0.000043247543,0.0017012308,0.33970037,0.0006065416,0.0013829549,0.4354852,0.14393698,0.063462816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023211682,0.000023753837,0.02258071,0.0006773628,0.000037774207,0.00025203792,0.22956054,0.0004266772,0.0010992732,0.009797557,0.7354209,0.00010009545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97958195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98834383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10404987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10404987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061975952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7549382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155927173","doi":"","title":"A Narrative Approach to Research.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of environmental education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Humanities; Narrative inquiry; Metaphor; Epistemology; Philosophy; Conversation; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09200541785744251,"score_gpt":0.2910542965123083,"score_spread":0.19904887865486579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155927173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010020157,0.03428719,0.22274747,0.08655066,0.003755791,0.0011547543,0.0007369921,0.00028074047,0.6404663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5797751,0.036033083,0.19174787,0.020162588,0.0022755407,0.00346542,0.0007612002,0.00041613306,0.16536316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9644956,0.028558973,0.0010876018,0.00237676,0.0028940106,0.00058710336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97217077,0.01893813,0.0015711031,0.003897721,0.002186387,0.0012357753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02444065,0.0008637111,0.00078763295,0.0036844343,0.0069182185,0.016785206,0.002577293,0.00393978,0.018625444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023852825,0.0005735677,0.0008509,0.0037868768,0.03115839,0.021842182,0.009893583,0.005580418,0.0031687296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013861013,0.000025673342,0.00027091082,0.00036640288,0.000015325078,0.00012174466,0.036161877,0.00015074547,0.00015555084,0.92922467,0.009689656,0.02380359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014088367,0.00004052726,0.00025838468,0.0012601175,0.000011809288,0.000331985,0.032282025,0.00036910997,0.00022314687,0.3461598,0.61902636,0.000022683336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026377763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003756418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02444065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075490875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008880962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12925601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162369741","doi":"","title":"Ecofeminism and Rhetoric: Critical Perspectives on Sex, Technology, and Discourse","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œjournal of ecocriticism","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecofeminism; Rhetoric; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026337153230957873,"score_gpt":0.28575753150253674,"score_spread":0.2594203782715789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162369741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08839068,0.05144365,0.02039639,0.27093494,0.0037611467,0.00010568303,0.000094173374,0.0000627947,0.5648106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96716857,0.007961198,0.0020965873,0.008493698,0.0020521225,0.00013900248,0.000027560589,0.00009419848,0.01196693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890911,0.008963183,0.00015002677,0.0004471695,0.0007640686,0.00058457325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93869495,0.05673547,0.0013096896,0.0009976,0.0014895188,0.0007727272],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015959203,0.0010867313,0.0008150436,0.006917229,0.014444961,0.021747304,0.0019081498,0.008098341,0.0065039154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02307152,0.00040743794,0.0004267321,0.005148401,0.09368719,0.019875055,0.007918974,0.008211324,0.0004137166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013276163,0.00001741368,0.00015096531,0.00008556026,0.0000024681085,0.00010132596,0.09492879,0.00003552015,0.00006894053,0.89943373,0.002020799,0.0031413008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034537163,0.000042578216,0.0005469234,0.0014046625,0.000014938778,0.00035827022,0.24635641,0.00037124226,0.00053868303,0.5398431,0.21046492,0.000023760624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023606082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026606026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98555505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060297116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005109042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08440137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165248973","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2011.585171","title":"Review Essay: Assessing Rhetorics of Social Resistance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Griffin; Democracy; State (computer science); Social movement; Politics; Sociology; Public sphere; Media studies; Art history; Art; Political science; Classics; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Theology","score_opus":0.09695040382527086,"score_gpt":0.29854780232135103,"score_spread":0.20159739849608016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165248973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019599972,0.50954074,0.0049149096,0.17904207,0.065749206,0.0012932777,0.0028599694,0.00035241654,0.21664743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24091144,0.46279806,0.008765235,0.055327915,0.06066419,0.004083481,0.004652902,0.0007281976,0.16206855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920604,0.003220145,0.00042051065,0.0006381106,0.003442849,0.00021793223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222507,0.039156634,0.0063921157,0.0017155247,0.028245423,0.0022395551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007964821,0.00070902583,0.000969994,0.006645219,0.0017225598,0.006632298,0.0011702263,0.0020471136,0.01818953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09051954,0.00030998394,0.0005826692,0.0066525955,0.0013502036,0.0039003934,0.001619982,0.0016630429,0.008063722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005895483,0.00005556476,0.001261194,0.0029200807,0.000070958835,0.00007792546,0.0015544858,0.00009691629,0.00033651423,0.0049884995,0.8364641,0.15211481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003478418,0.00018624979,0.009597107,0.006500338,0.00012731437,0.00023290553,0.0042782826,0.00020762949,0.0002975443,0.0034622971,0.9750295,0.0000459223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002363006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051397746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01818953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003303992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005138931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060850024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165505162","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v6n5p50","title":"Silencing Climate Change in Utah Through Extremist Rhetoric and Stakeholder Processes: A Critical Discourse Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Rhetoric; Idealization; Sociology; Rationality; Public interest; Politics; Political science; Discourse analysis; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.08123943020510165,"score_gpt":0.30086605932798904,"score_spread":0.21962662912288738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165505162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8704989,0.0033472944,0.02353569,0.032888856,0.00062455644,0.0005050903,0.00020923124,0.00012608989,0.068264246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848667,0.0007094664,0.008265456,0.00135248,0.00015860997,0.0003106555,0.00007754317,0.00004711599,0.0042118984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98802394,0.009066395,0.00023413333,0.00061628997,0.0013838981,0.0006753018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611072,0.03466777,0.0010280004,0.00058562803,0.0021682596,0.00044319878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026806762,0.00072467007,0.00054122665,0.005496573,0.021554187,0.009434369,0.0022804716,0.003669124,0.0017211657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023993157,0.00033452947,0.0004164058,0.0034220975,0.025725018,0.008219841,0.008174244,0.0027576159,0.00012319518],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031619442,0.000035423785,0.0012212858,0.00012600368,0.000007585671,0.000258845,0.9195526,0.00021806912,0.0007808276,0.067422695,0.002041919,0.008302958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019141693,0.00006282619,0.0026482404,0.00070561207,0.000033383385,0.00014205018,0.84583837,0.0022022806,0.0032720778,0.03558542,0.109439194,0.000051360836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016784213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025150867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026806762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016313126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014571037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14176935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165561324","doi":"","title":"A critical examination and development of Wellman’s theory of conductive argument","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11588746090214895,"score_gpt":0.2400359487223322,"score_spread":0.12414848782018324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165561324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045740705,0.013184567,0.26564714,0.2386296,0.0036095183,0.0006025068,0.00016459763,0.00019143107,0.43222994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002597,0.005770704,0.052392732,0.011020884,0.0009891802,0.0008188834,0.00006500907,0.00020182546,0.028481044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97416073,0.019673223,0.0005288532,0.0012017209,0.0035343673,0.00090110896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92429435,0.06467415,0.0018894814,0.0024085306,0.006012992,0.0007205488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03763441,0.0008706859,0.0007609925,0.0076924213,0.008786149,0.011413593,0.0023983584,0.0046142456,0.0036913059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05659574,0.00053456676,0.00083959906,0.0042763,0.06424062,0.019682126,0.005593197,0.008691847,0.0005109378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063420302,0.0000060152433,0.00004224842,0.000034762284,0.000001925523,0.000058389676,0.01300745,0.0001036287,0.000032483942,0.9812231,0.0021992535,0.0032843775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012179079,0.0000158573,0.00011233797,0.0005067742,0.000006177504,0.0001236037,0.013843369,0.0012350002,0.00042234967,0.8478285,0.1358739,0.000019876541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046900776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006641978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03763441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016168961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013252577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19903219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166416445","doi":"10.7202/1025618ar","title":"Extraordinary Ordinariness: Realism Now and Then","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Narrative; Politics; Shock (circulatory); Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Art; Literature; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.025202071504700913,"score_gpt":0.21282561778585635,"score_spread":0.18762354628115543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166416445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06795487,0.0073467055,0.014840507,0.08717179,0.0014647228,0.000030490111,0.000036241523,0.00009242804,0.8210622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655304,0.0010326685,0.0009808862,0.0030449762,0.0003795241,0.000019684187,0.000015041206,0.0000536618,0.028943252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959131,0.0027281158,0.00007139018,0.00036801372,0.00057040947,0.00034894096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974107,0.0013984347,0.00020101838,0.00047789628,0.00023726877,0.00027456362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034732034,0.00029369915,0.00034156846,0.000664454,0.006088633,0.009433264,0.0006351964,0.00228933,0.003897415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957193,0.00023389328,0.00022827236,0.0004121487,0.043968953,0.009451054,0.004937943,0.007140605,0.000562251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010034706,0.0000048052875,0.000109102926,0.000017979652,0.0000013597878,0.000067709894,0.0250519,0.000038013262,0.00012604798,0.97064084,0.0015935472,0.0023385903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022764223,0.000036656,0.00040917477,0.00023420274,0.000009013497,0.0003147606,0.040131655,0.0003375359,0.00041881998,0.6456046,0.31246188,0.000018913717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036043925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038045067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009433264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005170026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001954903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03751141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167133869","doi":"10.1177/0957926504046503","title":"There’s Risks in Everything: Extreme-Case Formulations and Accountability in Inquiry Testimony","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse & Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Accountability; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.23923990506358986,"score_gpt":0.37139286523136916,"score_spread":0.1321529601677793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167133869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47523183,0.0046296697,0.1511467,0.05896225,0.00044029552,0.00060119363,0.00009488863,0.0001049085,0.30878824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874709,0.0003334281,0.009327851,0.0007692091,0.00004229428,0.00012316117,0.000012039117,0.000016592938,0.0019045663],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93434936,0.056170408,0.0011939697,0.0010995605,0.0057183043,0.0014684404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8944022,0.09337815,0.0063828207,0.0028942737,0.0022190192,0.00072353595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029362533,0.00059732684,0.00047962816,0.002809294,0.010636502,0.010063028,0.0022827522,0.0051141903,0.0016184903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067608945,0.0005129197,0.00034784636,0.0020138074,0.033660192,0.010460869,0.00923474,0.006006026,0.0001742937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005284041,0.000043637538,0.0012769119,0.00015765848,0.000012430898,0.000907454,0.49451873,0.0005854001,0.00068255514,0.48023346,0.0014038311,0.020125115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040797255,0.000084841675,0.0034393978,0.0012031444,0.000037200567,0.0013835059,0.48962602,0.0054001245,0.0025007206,0.399963,0.096226506,0.00009484479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007863136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013132044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029362533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008600784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005158309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15528578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171377141","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17000713.v1","title":"A Post-Environmental Discourse: Rhetoric, Science and Legitimacy in Environmental News Coverage of Lake Winnipeg, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmentalism; Legitimacy; Mainstream; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Political science; Public discourse; Opposition (politics); Narrative; Discourse analysis; Politics; Critical discourse analysis; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Ideology","score_opus":0.013253454532074261,"score_gpt":0.2313932467198686,"score_spread":0.21813979218779433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171377141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77938384,0.005095282,0.0007910945,0.06792963,0.00040349073,0.0001251099,0.000574238,0.00005320843,0.1456441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867639,0.0013623437,0.00029085806,0.0013254136,0.00004089255,0.000028798626,0.00009760808,0.00002858847,0.010061588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552935,0.0011732734,0.0001244968,0.00040164002,0.0017427134,0.0010284533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98002416,0.011495857,0.0012585581,0.00027796155,0.0053003123,0.0016430378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004604228,0.0004905108,0.0003826113,0.003920864,0.033683594,0.014305018,0.0016357572,0.0021264309,0.0045768395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018341387,0.0005300218,0.00021415242,0.006015978,0.017017672,0.0029382745,0.0039578727,0.0033358526,0.00021851023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008426315,0.00002544232,0.010641195,0.00024208876,0.000014576698,0.0015605538,0.9263947,0.00018279799,0.0010262921,0.035157636,0.011165833,0.013504631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014448423,0.00002156555,0.03227532,0.00046022542,0.00003640462,0.00012788753,0.7647687,0.0005163569,0.0010880614,0.0023485937,0.19827355,0.00006884851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99170625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20865445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20865445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14679389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9178487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175885684","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731596.013.045","title":"Rhetoric and Science","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Ethos; Witness; Narrative; Literature; Objectivity (philosophy); Period (music); Virtue; Style (visual arts); Representation (politics); History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.055532417156017894,"score_gpt":0.23039997110710536,"score_spread":0.17486755395108747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175885684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014643056,0.033916652,0.0047836057,0.045451287,0.001597796,0.00002297961,0.0000936272,0.00006006673,0.89943093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9063396,0.0152983805,0.0022077672,0.0052948277,0.0027630853,0.00006005822,0.0001106257,0.00011261582,0.06781304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406886,0.0038578373,0.00019672651,0.0004291314,0.0012042217,0.00024322107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986021,0.011633932,0.0005117592,0.000570182,0.0010258999,0.00023717807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047135954,0.0005588796,0.00048680336,0.0041113426,0.0059943236,0.011845645,0.00088631525,0.0026905714,0.009237027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011837476,0.00016951174,0.0001782193,0.0032288989,0.031417105,0.009226472,0.0034346208,0.0030798407,0.0012695186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057169714,0.0000048542815,0.0000701112,0.00008547481,0.0000014181136,0.000050521357,0.014382454,0.000045012086,0.000057889778,0.9731267,0.006120155,0.006049551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011994021,0.000020942976,0.00031924408,0.0011045292,0.000004915427,0.00019461919,0.013426854,0.00024412332,0.00029223994,0.44934955,0.53501916,0.000011865089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023476712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015182354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006630734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035862287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04810959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187930143","doi":"10.1162/lmj_a_00935","title":"Sonic Proxemics and the Art of Persuasion: An Analytical Framework","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leonardo Music Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Proxemics; Spatialization; Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Computer science; Politics; Human–computer interaction; Aesthetics; Art; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Literature","score_opus":0.14266276601478864,"score_gpt":0.2959887108979432,"score_spread":0.15332594488315457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187930143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06765605,0.020553155,0.25395882,0.028658003,0.0013074295,0.000206778,0.00013733447,0.00025898847,0.6272635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658004,0.0025770457,0.01837558,0.0005574028,0.0006693237,0.00024024224,0.00002982457,0.00008350002,0.011666547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946556,0.0039264252,0.00013187,0.00031515566,0.0006630641,0.00030788916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915302,0.00715602,0.0004475021,0.0003817375,0.000301677,0.00018290394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056214305,0.0009993511,0.0005561522,0.005909595,0.004688531,0.014367155,0.0020341286,0.0035698342,0.0070940843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010565079,0.00048913923,0.00076974253,0.0027287405,0.033392712,0.010699146,0.0051727514,0.0030528929,0.000611463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010218102,0.000006361152,0.00011645098,0.00007709884,0.0000044737008,0.00006161852,0.011430486,0.0003722691,0.000106125524,0.9833747,0.00031729887,0.0041228426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026985845,0.00005103803,0.000540979,0.00042427276,0.000021975606,0.00022584069,0.020709615,0.0028916104,0.0005232989,0.89251715,0.082036816,0.00003037577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012028752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007165294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014367155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025778594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014621378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029729307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189764937","doi":"","title":"Of Women, Wolves, and the \"Second World\" of Discursive Polemics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian review of comparative literature","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Literature; History; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.024034769898565945,"score_gpt":0.26676496787539167,"score_spread":0.2427301979768257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189764937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17618233,0.11779637,0.0013619614,0.17604506,0.0015439538,0.00004502652,0.00022004644,0.000034752346,0.52677053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144241,0.014016247,0.0003107319,0.007966136,0.00039831872,0.000033404962,0.000039579438,0.00005611489,0.0627553],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712116,0.0017661771,0.000045521967,0.00018793409,0.00041549123,0.00046379695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996566,0.002192106,0.0002273378,0.00016439901,0.0005250604,0.00032508725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031496526,0.0005000036,0.0005005708,0.002903659,0.022431651,0.013090336,0.00096490054,0.0026298747,0.004757656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005642968,0.00031270643,0.0001205574,0.0036751833,0.05041656,0.0063987714,0.0034489154,0.004370033,0.0004511517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002062532,0.000013437519,0.00096864614,0.00010214642,0.00000601697,0.0003699366,0.75495833,0.0000237996,0.00010512689,0.20497757,0.027030123,0.011424217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004500901,0.0000073476353,0.0036083923,0.0005158156,0.000009076762,0.00020784554,0.6579715,0.000024657273,0.00013630299,0.016909387,0.32059032,0.000014769657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53757995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7681754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53757995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01798301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93028665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190741863","doi":"10.22329/il.v35i4.4333","title":"On Novels as Arguments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentation theory; Argument map; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Narrative; Philosophy; Term (time); Linguistics","score_opus":0.14198497969348653,"score_gpt":0.2922095148641722,"score_spread":0.15022453517068565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190741863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043348044,0.013049796,0.043081563,0.03175442,0.0019650334,0.00009361752,0.0002225252,0.00013896788,0.86634606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9348547,0.0048752446,0.011319759,0.0033350673,0.0018101287,0.0001841014,0.00017270894,0.00018830341,0.043259937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947791,0.0035890853,0.00015359491,0.00062687317,0.00053256756,0.0003187679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918183,0.005717456,0.0006954806,0.00096248684,0.0005468118,0.00025950134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044450043,0.0006846756,0.00046366843,0.0021347022,0.004345868,0.011853199,0.001060255,0.0033024144,0.009425741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00982799,0.00031359136,0.00058029464,0.0015777932,0.032429237,0.018206459,0.0047456007,0.0035610215,0.0012745102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005667591,0.0000037902641,0.000029931418,0.000026353971,0.0000013302795,0.000041747197,0.003222805,0.000041991247,0.000051334653,0.9943222,0.00084907655,0.0014038357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014830665,0.000019192345,0.00016663526,0.00018534825,0.0000052929913,0.00017775504,0.004133027,0.0002838757,0.00023434078,0.82722145,0.16754979,0.000008325193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065218686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075541745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011853199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003401216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011776099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031532228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197275125","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731596.013.056","title":"Rhetoric and Social Epistemology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Social epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.06130030624844132,"score_gpt":0.2302121819188958,"score_spread":0.1689118756704545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197275125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112845395,0.029851064,0.012517851,0.038352773,0.001459109,0.00002851315,0.00007545588,0.00008038788,0.9063502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90809566,0.01756483,0.0050963084,0.0042459294,0.0025413227,0.00010762951,0.00013112165,0.00016318772,0.06205403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153817,0.005895294,0.00021076431,0.0005132031,0.0015191509,0.000323461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99121124,0.007098917,0.0002861738,0.00048161444,0.0007265454,0.00019539848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054479316,0.0006476933,0.0007614891,0.004061229,0.00548877,0.013887502,0.0010858994,0.003607106,0.010458693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008931211,0.00023159543,0.0003432856,0.003284074,0.03911077,0.010704079,0.004835177,0.004171217,0.0012584153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017498093,0.000003241692,0.00003238542,0.00003350668,0.0000010401324,0.000022904049,0.0038344904,0.00004844031,0.000025205245,0.9916283,0.001505272,0.002863574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004915476,0.000008561484,0.000096613025,0.0004148276,0.0000026498626,0.000063488114,0.0046799276,0.00017627147,0.000098384466,0.8211454,0.17330272,0.0000062481913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015949059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011747227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013887502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063062613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038121354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045755327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W220355145","doi":"","title":"J. Rick Ponting. the Nisga'a Treaty: Polling Dynamics and Political Communication in Comparative Context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polling; Treaty; Politics; Public opinion; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Public administration; Sociology; Media studies; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.3392452484072377,"score_gpt":0.371402045705967,"score_spread":0.032156797298729334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W220355145","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054273143,0.7661457,0.001182704,0.09145287,0.011303704,0.00006839918,0.0003911025,0.0002619754,0.12865084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022198116,0.49027425,0.0015176373,0.018914448,0.008597611,0.0001861137,0.0005171213,0.0006528242,0.45714188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990245,0.00032930833,0.000053610867,0.00011911128,0.00038091536,0.00009261184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976835,0.001385863,0.00013732663,0.00009361469,0.00044117734,0.00025845575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017274052,0.0020474915,0.001067711,0.0027235523,0.0043909876,0.0052736844,0.0018659391,0.004246028,0.11564249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005045311,0.0012289861,0.0005119777,0.007416267,0.0042402563,0.012931442,0.0025050712,0.0051917667,0.032354206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023506174,0.000019209823,0.00009710275,0.0003122286,0.000007753746,0.00006536085,0.0012512063,0.000046834626,0.000058693382,0.008884558,0.9270278,0.0622057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137627,0.000013332932,0.0020942667,0.00064911426,0.000009733339,0.000116850264,0.0021288316,0.000057930647,0.000058978374,0.010166041,0.9846727,0.000018412946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07799768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16604729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9220023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005016235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024666332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38686264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221114506","doi":"","title":"Salute To Women Studies' Foremothers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08653423574648554,"score_gpt":0.2519157391099487,"score_spread":0.16538150336346313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221114506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045311674,0.005163048,0.000328396,0.8225051,0.111584485,0.000033405602,0.000041725038,0.000109749926,0.055702906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09505622,0.0031483273,0.00050896785,0.3914693,0.051587082,0.00009107919,0.000053576405,0.00023701119,0.4578484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072075,0.0029263867,0.0002328692,0.00076139055,0.0023147042,0.0030439128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97627115,0.0062335758,0.0009859663,0.0011091704,0.0037735642,0.011626644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008919798,0.0007889994,0.0012331464,0.0010608627,0.018327069,0.014681683,0.0013291707,0.010014989,0.05221795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025260663,0.0003616073,0.000704317,0.0009400921,0.008400603,0.0055036913,0.010103727,0.014266582,0.011249486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052913947,0.000042468513,0.0003651153,0.0000693987,0.000007517566,0.00022816389,0.0056252233,0.000021178876,0.00043830028,0.03736861,0.93711454,0.01866668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001047872,0.000031591222,0.00044133636,0.00010358936,0.00000381147,0.00007603728,0.0060746814,0.000021070275,0.00008058151,0.004316771,0.988832,0.000008002082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048139356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010321209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05221795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058641597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012165889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17468643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217834407","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731596.013.058","title":"Rhetoric and Environment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Anthropocentrism; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Natural (archaeology); Frame (networking); Value (mathematics); Rhetorical device; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; History; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07476256803747142,"score_gpt":0.21743116116143169,"score_spread":0.14266859312396027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217834407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02115573,0.0242544,0.014601929,0.053822465,0.0018511938,0.000038592054,0.00007647219,0.00011025898,0.88408905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94029105,0.009046568,0.0033054,0.0061344844,0.0017695585,0.00007278231,0.0000745041,0.00018016474,0.039125536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935848,0.0046687215,0.00013360303,0.00034941072,0.0010181372,0.00024535233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859162,0.012172441,0.0005006453,0.00041914257,0.000752735,0.00023867896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649241,0.0005058453,0.00048779507,0.0030695335,0.0053178873,0.009899718,0.0008757684,0.0023086513,0.011387405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139656225,0.00020687388,0.00024392098,0.0020231188,0.020589372,0.009873686,0.004062531,0.0030477406,0.0012403694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008764841,0.000009410388,0.00009525916,0.0001235227,0.0000022021266,0.000075279626,0.013643716,0.000114198876,0.00014643862,0.9701524,0.005457296,0.010171531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016462289,0.000039681476,0.00039594405,0.0015014926,0.000010941607,0.00029394304,0.016194366,0.0005281936,0.0006115996,0.50177604,0.47861177,0.000019525438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009791492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007067763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011387405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037172486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022043502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0380947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238204363","doi":"10.29173/mruhr227","title":"Struggle and Emerge: An Analysis of the Biopic, Documentary, and Drama Film Genres","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mount Royal Undergraduate Humanities Review (MRUHR)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Biography; Cinematography; Art; Literature; Visual arts; Film genre; History; Movie theater","score_opus":0.06298401082423612,"score_gpt":0.2762924328856358,"score_spread":0.21330842206139972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238204363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5011612,0.12142634,0.0026015798,0.01663456,0.00061123946,0.00029073312,0.0005616312,0.000031374933,0.35668132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90018296,0.06978733,0.0017620783,0.0020904243,0.0005229848,0.00027200827,0.0005287314,0.000087175096,0.024766251],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791116,0.0010504952,0.00011727691,0.00014433179,0.00051139906,0.00026532655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963111,0.0023096704,0.0005334046,0.00009208817,0.00048172043,0.00027198184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028798305,0.00030855363,0.00049240806,0.006395277,0.00321889,0.006586872,0.0006474544,0.00081182295,0.0043856376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050872336,0.00019149756,0.00032272283,0.007960556,0.0041651544,0.0047897524,0.0032409024,0.0017009645,0.0005298879],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011437078,0.00007476287,0.010134081,0.0019256993,0.000048413687,0.0016341001,0.7093282,0.00007447453,0.0014113637,0.1576329,0.01664355,0.10097808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013813971,0.000060599097,0.043065764,0.002592727,0.000036668313,0.0013011314,0.65003437,0.00012502451,0.00033312253,0.007616976,0.2948041,0.00001572501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006204093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011572043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006586872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032677753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025315774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023709536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245221088","doi":"10.1080/10417940309373277","title":"The talk of movers and shakers: Class conflict in the making of a community disaster","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Southern Communication Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Ideology; Politics; Action (physics); Public relations; Collective action; Class (philosophy); Flood myth; Political science; Sociology; Event (particle physics); Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08776958730782376,"score_gpt":0.2875711329975368,"score_spread":0.19980154568971303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245221088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4853697,0.0064745243,0.00692917,0.14239068,0.0030002233,0.00014813084,0.000068381465,0.0001371534,0.35548195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816421,0.0006493708,0.00044061444,0.0042098192,0.0004712762,0.000049860708,0.000014874355,0.00006435868,0.012457804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004984,0.0080867605,0.00011011231,0.00034686216,0.0006938563,0.00071260263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98996186,0.007870707,0.0007145964,0.00030303025,0.00032094587,0.00082886097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079366425,0.00071393314,0.00046486486,0.00204558,0.027072644,0.010894608,0.0014064695,0.0050624763,0.0054194434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012661921,0.0004793475,0.0004026149,0.0011534002,0.02746815,0.009655026,0.010610675,0.007562461,0.0007707492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006763919,0.000027200773,0.0006736058,0.00007582305,0.000011288582,0.0007200412,0.9019863,0.00005152573,0.0004345606,0.08143841,0.008307603,0.006205847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000521024,0.000083649225,0.0015130106,0.0003412221,0.000023462186,0.0006355167,0.7512929,0.00034926547,0.0007385916,0.03161258,0.21332252,0.000035139285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047841547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004883359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027072644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004767641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00206974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04197347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246800868","doi":"10.2304/pfie.2014.12.2.237","title":"America's Descent into Madness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Neoliberalism (international relations); Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Cruelty; Democracy; Materialism; Public sphere; Political economy; Media studies; Law; Political science; Criminology; Social science","score_opus":0.01829990485378975,"score_gpt":0.3024191939415958,"score_spread":0.28411928908780604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246800868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12555385,0.01822618,0.0014769023,0.16530038,0.0022380583,0.000015175553,0.00007559514,0.0000816231,0.6870321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88394344,0.0057463036,0.00048992585,0.024351818,0.00065558136,0.000017012222,0.000035683486,0.000054461594,0.08470588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925584,0.00031057114,0.0000138183,0.000078791876,0.00014045635,0.0002005282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999421,0.00021998427,0.000075484786,0.00003666062,0.00012101276,0.00012585089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006781982,0.00021656202,0.00017367376,0.00082337274,0.010142813,0.0048563574,0.00032349784,0.0013616547,0.0048350235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012863587,0.00009602583,0.00013938225,0.0006865704,0.013858056,0.0034098981,0.0033605478,0.004718226,0.00040313648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020493357,0.000023396138,0.0013910654,0.0000662796,0.000003924198,0.0004913657,0.22436374,0.000038731625,0.0004281233,0.6925711,0.05002613,0.03057574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026497694,0.000019570894,0.0015505849,0.00017490223,0.0000028732295,0.00022308955,0.048630428,0.000034910794,0.00018374452,0.025576942,0.92358655,0.000013723814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02756758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043523546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02756758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050229398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027624457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05481422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262234015","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-1288-1_4","title":"Controversy as an Event Category","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Narrative; Event (particle physics); Phenomenon; Individuation; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; History; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05008203624402448,"score_gpt":0.24423868611501137,"score_spread":0.1941566498709869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262234015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004437596,0.0050915033,0.013425113,0.003767876,0.0006410666,0.000043484775,0.000085363776,0.0000706656,0.97243744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53424466,0.0064912885,0.009040083,0.001700793,0.002775743,0.00029909972,0.00051069085,0.0003936544,0.44454405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979437,0.0010798417,0.00008582439,0.0002350668,0.0004764447,0.0001792125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976382,0.0015107044,0.00012858027,0.00021559568,0.00030437866,0.0002026439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014872773,0.00060706574,0.0006039462,0.0041032736,0.005435041,0.01615845,0.0016339825,0.002780112,0.01961492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004023399,0.0003799905,0.0006817456,0.004676632,0.008692977,0.012324121,0.0034452311,0.004741791,0.0029814183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000526893,0.0000082030165,0.000028220347,0.000029407047,0.0000013573283,0.000018769857,0.0013452651,0.00004534625,0.000034238645,0.98345435,0.006333235,0.008696268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090068725,0.000009193788,0.00016303903,0.00014940344,0.0000066167026,0.00012213668,0.0017900573,0.0004999115,0.0001369649,0.68504775,0.31205493,0.000010953353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017802175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028093716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01961492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042142873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021792764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065618396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277532566","doi":"10.29173/pandpr22144","title":"What’s in a Name? The Experience of the Other in Online Classrooms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phenomenology & Practice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Experiential learning; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Online learning; Thematic analysis; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Multimedia; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.05976106888627016,"score_gpt":0.30740812454315836,"score_spread":0.2476470556568882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277532566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92910814,0.0022018815,0.005988669,0.010232755,0.0006749977,0.00004164805,0.000045235178,0.00010721518,0.051599495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939634,0.00040692603,0.0005429819,0.0008228638,0.000072600575,0.000015626674,0.0000128571055,0.000049384566,0.004113252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787992,0.016877756,0.00034742084,0.0009823798,0.0016680519,0.0013250964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844922,0.010213917,0.0016432927,0.0008468656,0.0006737789,0.0021299927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008615218,0.00069066655,0.000969964,0.0016201,0.015853066,0.01392008,0.0016778967,0.0038516885,0.0036597908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021775596,0.00055490574,0.00062837754,0.0010857017,0.029361112,0.02034268,0.015098594,0.00643989,0.0006963252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023258359,0.000020697167,0.00066954317,0.00003298449,0.0000035772907,0.00043550014,0.99058443,0.000012984693,0.00055628404,0.004899961,0.00042403588,0.0023366679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006491897,0.00006248632,0.0007078838,0.00009278091,0.000008431816,0.0010404758,0.9649613,0.000063943065,0.00026028644,0.001906474,0.030863917,0.000025628293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016431849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027153585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015853066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002209812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014924243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045562148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279851911","doi":"10.21810/strm.v5i1.80","title":"Contestation, a Deeper Seduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stream Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Spectacle; Action (physics); Media event; Event (particle physics); Media studies; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Art; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.025672706531107873,"score_gpt":0.28578859587704686,"score_spread":0.260115889345939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279851911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082978494,0.009218319,0.055085577,0.12096675,0.003956791,0.00015274638,0.00012360864,0.00039818411,0.7271195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197329,0.0013058687,0.006767764,0.009259939,0.0014449315,0.0001331935,0.000061390936,0.00039472102,0.06089913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822202,0.01119318,0.00052419177,0.0021107658,0.0028160966,0.001135535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851988,0.0075444677,0.0009397573,0.0034546838,0.0017996904,0.0010626096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014953434,0.0011394145,0.0011378494,0.0025028226,0.011660268,0.022412159,0.0018188467,0.004535681,0.0067910096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018919935,0.0005211423,0.0009657619,0.0013360159,0.08778401,0.02908803,0.01829073,0.009976226,0.001346231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026334807,0.000014108352,0.00019593196,0.00005303021,0.000009186382,0.0001374888,0.07190715,0.000058825968,0.00055161706,0.9175585,0.003075758,0.0064121354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028077215,0.000055690314,0.00037700767,0.00031204463,0.000020503545,0.000418917,0.048300035,0.00042498697,0.0010362226,0.5844924,0.36448786,0.000046308724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036841754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024165395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022412159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069482257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052847792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07908225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280680099","doi":"","title":"The Press Looks at the Problem of Reconciling the Meeting of Energy Demands with Environmental Protection: A Canadian Journalist's Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Energy (signal processing); Political science; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Operations research; Sociology; Environmental protection; Engineering; Environmental science; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02668419872446499,"score_gpt":0.17948548735377773,"score_spread":0.15280128862931275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280680099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002842483,0.016580174,0.00090810633,0.8011395,0.002648422,0.0000143195675,0.000067071436,0.000040145365,0.17575987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.344732,0.025600748,0.0028075413,0.51884323,0.007642938,0.00010690777,0.000080585625,0.0002870466,0.09989894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865224,0.0029915844,0.00033271732,0.000869697,0.0055067386,0.0037769377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686788,0.020119486,0.00095386256,0.00049369916,0.0066098254,0.003144362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01320522,0.0011632356,0.0015404967,0.009226136,0.055902258,0.051761966,0.005661774,0.042900383,0.009024048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030420557,0.0011507454,0.0012170341,0.0153589295,0.087285064,0.015498299,0.006362527,0.03189815,0.0010117746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009026753,0.000010452898,0.00016057488,0.000064748434,0.000008749955,0.0001678081,0.008878382,0.00024564267,0.00008335188,0.88992965,0.09595748,0.004483995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034817665,0.000010307583,0.00089940446,0.00045420913,0.000039983915,0.000092105685,0.023978481,0.00036148756,0.00016855367,0.22768317,0.74617714,0.00010030802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9530262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96769965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10439945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10439945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20471254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75747454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289337936","doi":"10.14288/1.0088275","title":"Suspend the bridge : community power, regime theory and the decision to build Vancouver’s Lions’ Gate Bridge","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Power (physics); Engineering; Forensic engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.021155488224794624,"score_gpt":0.2106553771136167,"score_spread":0.18949988888882208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289337936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3436325,0.0027354744,0.0041528833,0.10007951,0.00073262316,0.00011052709,0.000045912388,0.000035224646,0.5484754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93758506,0.0004455206,0.0006795244,0.006073853,0.000067747664,0.000053937172,0.00001943376,0.000027094378,0.055047788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949661,0.0013339439,0.000060923678,0.0004583347,0.0012639274,0.0019167783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607444,0.0011303809,0.00014235362,0.00015155965,0.00074396725,0.001757319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004125551,0.00028908535,0.0002713773,0.0010184433,0.028636403,0.012246529,0.0022082229,0.007766902,0.008208234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074524274,0.00036434684,0.00026507128,0.0010311111,0.020788182,0.0034861132,0.0066643273,0.007298075,0.000523347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030756095,0.000049676157,0.0035780636,0.00002788725,0.000008271254,0.0008277962,0.029379204,0.0004512112,0.00029475562,0.9272847,0.019846551,0.01822112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093537834,0.00010897006,0.011941336,0.00042819945,0.000022606428,0.00031143558,0.12555742,0.0025190306,0.0007439267,0.2819794,0.5761557,0.00013846082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5752762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7881471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4247238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031031037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029422542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85445017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295613278","doi":"10.1080/09644016.2016.1154124","title":"Scaling up site disputes: strategies to redefine ‘local’ in the fight against fracking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Politics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Civil society; Hydraulic fracturing; Environmental movement; Insider; Political science; China; Political economy; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.027687175301854557,"score_gpt":0.233536020064492,"score_spread":0.20584884476263746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295613278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47724143,0.0017609935,0.016371526,0.061473336,0.0007310878,0.00026141916,0.000041406307,0.00030997256,0.44180876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835755,0.00017361094,0.00095858925,0.0018627264,0.00006591508,0.00004215018,0.000010585721,0.000047505568,0.013263327],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964736,0.002108574,0.00008186065,0.00042075804,0.00028293562,0.00063221814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993944,0.0038994083,0.00055615604,0.0006204938,0.00042073347,0.00055919983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006423992,0.00042892297,0.000278666,0.0012508811,0.01825744,0.006629522,0.0016329491,0.0042003966,0.010886517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074788923,0.000291986,0.00029265208,0.0012941937,0.022020115,0.008669222,0.00819111,0.00443989,0.000976009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006118219,0.00012694181,0.0035019205,0.0002609951,0.000017861868,0.0010925169,0.57197255,0.00033872333,0.0028453255,0.34801593,0.022677105,0.049088925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036348683,0.00012793089,0.002886343,0.00026075623,0.000026475092,0.00036039462,0.5818373,0.0009744687,0.0018845638,0.037764225,0.37380147,0.00003981909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083137145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022393566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01825744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063350694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035797684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0459643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301508880","doi":"","title":"Chiasmus in Rhetoric","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08918532863206237,"score_gpt":0.3015431913580603,"score_spread":0.21235786272599794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301508880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062770635,0.01592556,0.006683542,0.046622436,0.0016964133,0.000040787094,0.00006109545,0.000059413727,0.86614007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96718115,0.0021657196,0.0007002094,0.0027091834,0.0010779116,0.00004016306,0.00002756392,0.000049378847,0.026048725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454725,0.0039946213,0.000117177566,0.00027403998,0.00064143474,0.00042559256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882395,0.008970275,0.0007086036,0.00047490688,0.001116244,0.00049039576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004686898,0.0005095457,0.00037851915,0.004078016,0.007934247,0.010739554,0.0007636713,0.003080075,0.008071553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011357858,0.00025903177,0.00018746984,0.0038199788,0.025035003,0.008859808,0.003796224,0.0066981753,0.0009937969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010945339,0.000009357528,0.0001991343,0.00005112251,0.0000022956203,0.00006939631,0.02356155,0.000025125339,0.000084545274,0.96880734,0.0028474284,0.0043317904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039537117,0.00007034312,0.0015334006,0.00052627595,0.000022565111,0.00038242465,0.041593146,0.0005417817,0.00076750794,0.68957716,0.26491952,0.000026405603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001809086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019048897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010739554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042818566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029765195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031067252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307413396","doi":"10.3968/8202","title":"Viciousness: The Image of Snake in Bay of Souls","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Soul; Worry; Aesthetics; Cover (algebra); Art; History; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02601624598367156,"score_gpt":0.30019322986402175,"score_spread":0.27417698388035017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307413396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4742839,0.0053186463,0.0077873613,0.06765524,0.0023104455,0.000040047245,0.00007357721,0.00019557613,0.44233516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830428,0.00044858747,0.0006493968,0.0016712177,0.00013060498,0.000008412351,0.000014047546,0.00006555698,0.013969461],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803156,0.0014854849,0.000029584018,0.000107112755,0.00021389348,0.00013234558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974809,0.001428924,0.0002759054,0.00013455458,0.00029712383,0.00038257331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021202948,0.0003672512,0.0002639737,0.0010518798,0.010926526,0.005717695,0.0007622648,0.0023877237,0.00303334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058038584,0.00022702085,0.0002536108,0.00055070635,0.021277945,0.00460857,0.004475738,0.004262776,0.00044666586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039826467,0.00001058754,0.00074032444,0.0000810873,0.00000744648,0.00093272055,0.85898036,0.00004534557,0.0009553668,0.12695637,0.0068579004,0.0043925503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016365237,0.000093861076,0.0025426182,0.000427197,0.00002874995,0.0021942959,0.6460688,0.0004329274,0.0016726978,0.020788817,0.32568604,0.000047617767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065450175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011543189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010926526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031530603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016096507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022877157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308686897","doi":"","title":"Christopher W. Tindale , Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument . Reviewed by","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.07158917534985733,"score_gpt":0.261874338382071,"score_spread":0.1902851630322137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308686897","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023344152,0.9490632,0.0009389193,0.034861144,0.005099308,0.000010914594,0.000055642427,0.000014890664,0.009722664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009802518,0.9604821,0.0008786535,0.010010294,0.008356778,0.00003273433,0.000098320845,0.00003959227,0.010298976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838483,0.00063462794,0.00012950442,0.00023279114,0.00054377737,0.00007443418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99052507,0.006480261,0.00042133994,0.00015752164,0.0020868655,0.00032909197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021697134,0.0015075727,0.0013158364,0.008219428,0.0025066421,0.004339297,0.0022429621,0.005305153,0.014191692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008904808,0.0009608512,0.0005806321,0.009987634,0.0071697463,0.012310389,0.0017059832,0.0061373385,0.0055696187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059586677,0.00005152648,0.00043151627,0.003946743,0.00006144334,0.00028444707,0.0026897602,0.0004819256,0.0002228479,0.11544472,0.779736,0.09658948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031098407,0.000017831237,0.0019776498,0.0042195693,0.00004072586,0.00069387216,0.0016117011,0.00030357466,0.00021816899,0.08222869,0.90861,0.00004723913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015557832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030210834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015557832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036786837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029594726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047475934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313039746","doi":"10.1177/1474474014530961","title":"Paradoxes of ethically branded bottled water: constituting the solution to the world water crisis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Geographies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Bottled water; Ethos; Consumption (sociology); Business; Marketing; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.038583309413481454,"score_gpt":0.25762308543286755,"score_spread":0.2190397760193861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313039746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45132726,0.0062035597,0.04980659,0.15276276,0.002060149,0.00019266205,0.000054498054,0.00016508627,0.33742735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98737305,0.0006220667,0.0036576916,0.0032983616,0.000169552,0.000060718703,0.000011128822,0.000075454256,0.004732075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893516,0.0079865325,0.00022042396,0.0005332594,0.0014723161,0.00043589913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98706645,0.010006693,0.0011449842,0.0006849971,0.00071960187,0.0003771494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011320269,0.00070235477,0.00054085534,0.0019040927,0.009584878,0.009715282,0.0014723423,0.006104817,0.0022716832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016763352,0.00050298765,0.00044518235,0.0013353252,0.06004854,0.016799865,0.008805872,0.007203146,0.00023651864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023879844,0.000020263991,0.00028359276,0.00010906377,0.000005441473,0.00042215682,0.25900215,0.0001863154,0.0007778145,0.7340942,0.0014998028,0.003575298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034729142,0.000060777704,0.00058731437,0.0005254723,0.000020982148,0.00077176647,0.35443735,0.00212422,0.0022627541,0.44704205,0.19206552,0.00006718912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002400728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021220644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011320269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061248094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035283575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059867978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313116508","doi":"10.1386/pi.2.1.11_1","title":"Against ethnomusicology: Language performance and the social impact of ritual performance in Islam","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Performing Islam","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnomusicology; Islam; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Scope (computer science); Aesthetics; Literature; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Art; Musical","score_opus":0.02558455895460521,"score_gpt":0.27661178151020316,"score_spread":0.25102722255559795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313116508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7181818,0.006113166,0.00870732,0.014682124,0.00021611454,0.000035131132,0.000038805116,0.000035343648,0.2519903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983589,0.00036071587,0.0002146129,0.00013948463,0.000040511783,0.000009466447,0.0000034217517,0.0000063255766,0.0008665189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413365,0.0048256107,0.000090562644,0.00025809527,0.00044045318,0.00025156196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99129397,0.006945461,0.0006976422,0.0005298016,0.00038171193,0.00015143128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056415205,0.000484262,0.0003559564,0.002343326,0.0048861546,0.006913247,0.0008715376,0.0016657409,0.0032765048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00755412,0.00013470474,0.00012016076,0.0017715117,0.049376577,0.005427646,0.006863755,0.0019538808,0.0001878139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006881898,0.000044685043,0.0030156334,0.00022311413,0.0000141326955,0.0004912239,0.47938505,0.00026259825,0.00084277906,0.48727897,0.0011813294,0.0271917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014411069,0.000098361445,0.00988364,0.00088498375,0.000025648647,0.0006153456,0.8318647,0.00092191534,0.0017776587,0.09533156,0.05854943,0.000032335967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002815988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031237837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006913247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002700646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011789398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029835582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314168658","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.19.1.005","title":"Taking off the Gloves: Dawkins and the Root of All Evil?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Secularism; Faith; Root (linguistics); Rhetoric; Narrative; Postmodernism; Philosophy; Adversary; Atheism; Aesthetics; Religious studies; Sociology; Epistemology; Theology; Islam","score_opus":0.04578269719890138,"score_gpt":0.2662208737861446,"score_spread":0.22043817658724324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314168658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044343065,0.13002098,0.0071772644,0.4678672,0.0077023166,0.0000323097,0.000038322716,0.00010089029,0.34271762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8543951,0.026285049,0.0030777112,0.037947007,0.0031589575,0.00003363714,0.000018657527,0.00016293238,0.074921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981133,0.0013302267,0.00002387853,0.000118880016,0.00029669728,0.00011700817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621236,0.0030211417,0.00014418477,0.00010626916,0.000322013,0.00019403773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002161457,0.0003867412,0.00030704908,0.0012651375,0.006857235,0.0057159555,0.0005106661,0.0026907683,0.0031715701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005558856,0.00025755074,0.00012195507,0.0007992926,0.017616376,0.007952178,0.0015215606,0.0046117827,0.00078577676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036608475,0.000017842773,0.00022580053,0.00012352357,0.0000062789513,0.00020569726,0.06811778,0.000052680924,0.0002487829,0.82946116,0.083237655,0.018266274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022281189,0.00003529024,0.0003888062,0.00038006238,0.000012371168,0.00040388928,0.07008949,0.00017573847,0.000675372,0.25323683,0.6745511,0.00002871827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008869959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016035534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008869959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038286354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020665487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027778804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315465247","doi":"10.5406/historypresent.5.1.0031","title":"Coming Out: Closet Rhetoric and Media Publics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of the Present","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closet; Rhetoric; Publics; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.202550447180996,"score_gpt":0.25727389737049344,"score_spread":0.05472345018949745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315465247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013600856,0.027281815,0.0012977773,0.20785743,0.0051998054,0.000018506767,0.00014665892,0.00010311099,0.7444941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7131593,0.021100411,0.00090119144,0.03089042,0.008445323,0.00004919252,0.00016477438,0.00042324123,0.22486612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956737,0.0020898075,0.0000983535,0.00035284428,0.0010944834,0.0006906837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316335,0.0037115265,0.0006528195,0.00039112152,0.0008117895,0.0012694194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005159293,0.0004198638,0.00045101004,0.0036775847,0.015626697,0.020563066,0.0009147487,0.0051815216,0.03727798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014063918,0.00038213632,0.00033923352,0.0033914542,0.022793714,0.022672629,0.006925236,0.008000644,0.0051271887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145746,0.000030872743,0.0005916237,0.00011255846,0.0000050044423,0.0002548792,0.03931604,0.00004073298,0.00012033821,0.77496773,0.15915017,0.025378622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009778835,0.000018977533,0.0013175464,0.0007699,0.000007988998,0.00019844982,0.031431757,0.00009666868,0.00021969725,0.099806264,0.86609805,0.000024924166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078078425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012342905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03727798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011902409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037556973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12470722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322608617","doi":"10.1386/mms.2.1.39_1","title":"‘Hypocritical bullshit performed through gritted teeth’: Authenticity discourses in Nickelback’s album reviews in Finnish media","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metal Music Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Persona; Originality; Sociology; Media studies; Aesthetics; Frame (networking); Art; Social science; Humanities; Computer science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.2283172213611025,"score_gpt":0.34349663872995423,"score_spread":0.11517941736885173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322608617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85667604,0.011753614,0.0018387472,0.016984077,0.0009596644,0.00007082997,0.00014209245,0.00008892037,0.111486055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944184,0.0009179436,0.00025550282,0.00041185188,0.00016278676,0.000017544322,0.00002509925,0.0000460011,0.0037449293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873465,0.0063947225,0.00045305214,0.0008889439,0.0037454679,0.0011713343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95389336,0.033616822,0.0035588443,0.0011835721,0.0065393983,0.001207988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012599867,0.0006509595,0.00051224837,0.005808642,0.018891195,0.012037856,0.0011753108,0.0034989365,0.0022337108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042793695,0.0004545505,0.00025095316,0.0031216638,0.017247384,0.0055476227,0.0045645405,0.0025208965,0.0002764922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639897,0.000007063049,0.0014971124,0.00019766002,0.000009695258,0.0011712711,0.97727406,0.000031781918,0.0012007286,0.006688134,0.0030775198,0.008798599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008196157,0.00004332456,0.008522566,0.00079666195,0.00003388848,0.0007513625,0.8086951,0.00010980046,0.0019663277,0.0009774804,0.17804673,0.00004855111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06961529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11382488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06961529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016849196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090437615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13842022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323987234","doi":"10.1386/ajms.4.1.131_1","title":"Environmental ethics and Indigenous identity in Wawatay News","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Indigenous; Symbol (formal); Ethnic group; Political science; Identity (music); News media; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Linguistics; Ecology","score_opus":0.14353496078824907,"score_gpt":0.3304189155569797,"score_spread":0.18688395476873065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323987234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6762923,0.0021859468,0.001375556,0.012992647,0.00020353288,0.000049258997,0.0000959141,0.00002767552,0.30677715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927862,0.00041304136,0.00016395363,0.00029981116,0.0000323118,0.000009709565,0.000015759351,0.000011721548,0.006267505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977582,0.00094608776,0.00006741157,0.00015549969,0.00061295147,0.0004599164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368393,0.0037394576,0.0007236594,0.00017026119,0.0011860528,0.0004966517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023260412,0.00024254505,0.00019846405,0.002332702,0.012848831,0.009484875,0.00050119555,0.0011538403,0.0037875657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006099302,0.0001831066,0.000113354516,0.0025396238,0.01540829,0.0029887185,0.0029955392,0.0014871258,0.0002211419],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003240263,0.000018375618,0.0061924723,0.00013871603,0.0000069509983,0.00093766616,0.9195841,0.00004882495,0.00079826295,0.06229422,0.0018345343,0.008113453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004424775,0.000012734404,0.01499301,0.0003291147,0.000016434422,0.00021969079,0.8396137,0.00013482645,0.000777252,0.0059643104,0.13791755,0.00001700454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34199545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39273235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6580045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017881645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011074233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6800096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325384304","doi":"10.1515/pol-2015-0007","title":"Illegal Search and Seizure, Due Process, and the Rights of the Accused: The Voices of Power in the Rhetoric of Los Angeles Police Chief William H. Parker","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pólemos","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hatch (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Supreme court; Rhetoric; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Literature; Theology","score_opus":0.03918218957420772,"score_gpt":0.27620809162955623,"score_spread":0.23702590205534851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325384304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12459954,0.0184062,0.006024276,0.42293692,0.0017893568,0.0000513226,0.0000446326,0.000043400476,0.4261043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779854,0.0017708966,0.00040417234,0.010930319,0.00067047274,0.000026470889,0.0000049219366,0.000020406369,0.00818697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870983,0.010156386,0.00022221445,0.0005820265,0.0012165465,0.00072456157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954743,0.041317448,0.0013224647,0.0006009564,0.0015435427,0.0004725281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012405533,0.00031521748,0.0003276046,0.0018657419,0.013798147,0.009943922,0.0010261402,0.0060808156,0.002675579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02539901,0.00031401197,0.00021393773,0.000874224,0.031281963,0.008849538,0.00439301,0.0068507786,0.00027102872],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020189766,0.000009817322,0.00028380897,0.000047730893,0.000004299436,0.00040378125,0.09466274,0.000108972294,0.00012456698,0.8839124,0.015037503,0.0053841765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005408518,0.000076820266,0.0013419732,0.0012886076,0.000030331572,0.0005324624,0.12499575,0.0011336356,0.0012459313,0.32401443,0.5451854,0.00010052846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012790049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01208291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013798147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009193716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004998856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066705406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327976147","doi":"10.5840/symposium20059112","title":"Rhetorics of Surveillance from Bentham to Big Brother","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Genealogy; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03514933510129798,"score_gpt":0.2410325079905356,"score_spread":0.20588317288923763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327976147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037977934,0.089592725,0.0054797153,0.318444,0.007418008,0.000020910606,0.000087568274,0.000079583,0.5408995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8766045,0.012157866,0.001156527,0.01810035,0.0028284763,0.000027128239,0.000025748363,0.00014862929,0.08895071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958021,0.0026149496,0.00011710943,0.00044958745,0.0005939424,0.00042228308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903516,0.007483497,0.00032758905,0.00039410518,0.00095217326,0.0004909995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004902674,0.0006143478,0.0004668581,0.0021556304,0.0140855955,0.013639638,0.0010102624,0.00560939,0.0075281956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010427427,0.0005856828,0.00021184536,0.0019409069,0.023555746,0.009035552,0.005196963,0.009061702,0.00092086446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024349763,0.0000058971345,0.00007012762,0.000048280857,0.0000034785533,0.00006289197,0.031367935,0.000038205,0.00012757634,0.93653035,0.021825438,0.009895571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016092234,0.00003255377,0.0007194453,0.00058735796,0.000019473275,0.00012486898,0.025220681,0.00019355954,0.00060727895,0.18549408,0.7869496,0.000035029403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044734575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0723125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044734575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013478898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004382788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09779668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2397437854","doi":"","title":"Speech Acts, Dialogues and the Common Ground.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Florida AI Research Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège de Maisonneuve","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Computer science; Speech recognition; Communication; Sociology","score_opus":0.2030177407554121,"score_gpt":0.36699492319656707,"score_spread":0.16397718244115497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2397437854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055960916,0.081570186,0.036349796,0.04564507,0.0013155758,0.000052425145,0.0003060228,0.00024368023,0.77855635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680296,0.006323184,0.003414697,0.0010239559,0.0005428634,0.00007159891,0.00010735894,0.00006445207,0.02042226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959054,0.0030286068,0.00013507779,0.00032079793,0.00041246854,0.00019763014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920705,0.0061881617,0.00054741703,0.00051217113,0.00039880697,0.00028290847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031547528,0.00050184235,0.00034484416,0.0023001847,0.0036971923,0.007155471,0.0007831092,0.0025054049,0.008441128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010981183,0.00026607903,0.0002038518,0.001442109,0.017524116,0.011050858,0.0029303324,0.0020655754,0.0010034268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004339374,0.000015194506,0.00041472458,0.00012441628,0.000008648088,0.00017582462,0.02250714,0.00012023163,0.00029230988,0.93700737,0.007857528,0.031433295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024633604,0.00004372059,0.0020016937,0.0005775591,0.0000228355,0.00042934204,0.032677952,0.00056022534,0.0005672422,0.7620464,0.20102751,0.000020892816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004019434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036634037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008441128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001970343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00156866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028238356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399433393","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3023","title":"In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Politics; Sociology; Anthropology; History; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07254106395858148,"score_gpt":0.2728778093746084,"score_spread":0.20033674541602695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399433393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19659339,0.0140783945,0.021452937,0.082620665,0.0032413362,0.00006389418,0.00035750118,0.000100370795,0.68149155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814077,0.0013917375,0.0019306457,0.0023758311,0.0003647985,0.000035800153,0.00004910242,0.00015104214,0.01229333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943311,0.0032530474,0.00019580052,0.0008085704,0.0007697239,0.00064166234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840119,0.009253257,0.0016687281,0.0015807752,0.002449518,0.0010357465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009548741,0.00023403896,0.00047018664,0.0023877216,0.008782462,0.01638377,0.0013873093,0.002943329,0.0120813055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03023371,0.00045534238,0.00030629477,0.0034440267,0.016948437,0.018443303,0.004510683,0.0050215833,0.0008703326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010915879,0.000018002243,0.0029308386,0.00009508268,0.000021184253,0.00022719508,0.067424186,0.00009996865,0.0007649648,0.9076238,0.00472235,0.015963204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007077214,0.000087964785,0.011705245,0.001115757,0.00013310285,0.00070864195,0.20932625,0.0007896343,0.0016827076,0.38755244,0.38670346,0.00012397903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034061693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044228554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034061693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008368337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076152724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06772685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W240912624","doi":"","title":"Thinking from Women’s Lives: Sandra Harding, Standpoint, & Science, the first project in the Women’s Studies Media Initiative, debuts December 3","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UCLA Center for the Study of Women","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Visual media; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Visual arts; Psychology; History; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.08824227855286518,"score_gpt":0.31577442383768034,"score_spread":0.22753214528481516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W240912624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011386969,0.051953923,0.0012518782,0.88265514,0.017556533,0.000083475694,0.00007486382,0.00021274916,0.034824464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21146305,0.08595943,0.004899367,0.35915512,0.011191059,0.0005378732,0.00013456638,0.00084021105,0.3258193],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979526,0.0010857643,0.00003812611,0.00019682218,0.00048222698,0.00024439194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948855,0.0021057155,0.00021133169,0.000105352556,0.00059494603,0.0020971398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048436783,0.00068751007,0.00040877194,0.00090603984,0.013598943,0.006567957,0.001192054,0.0035473935,0.0062587624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006607344,0.00046634214,0.00025069728,0.0005889152,0.0063435966,0.0072732745,0.0030306862,0.008817808,0.0018854882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048233927,0.00008131643,0.000523045,0.00015747764,0.000006298661,0.00021643515,0.050594024,0.000016183434,0.0004952615,0.011608617,0.89141184,0.044841208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014033812,0.00007923945,0.0006927215,0.00046206827,0.000007297204,0.00023448849,0.07323484,0.000038576705,0.00068395695,0.0029668827,0.9215638,0.000022082455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012290815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050480943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034042236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005264589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025616169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412641054","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3040","title":"Teaching Communication Activism: Communication Education for Social Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Social activism; Social communication; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Communication; Law","score_opus":0.07288512782898132,"score_gpt":0.30603374114182275,"score_spread":0.23314861331284142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412641054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03996466,0.05990253,0.051450286,0.15808453,0.01719728,0.00062305585,0.00010350351,0.00055747875,0.6721167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45116654,0.1000025,0.0514751,0.043909535,0.013386764,0.0016808466,0.0002977639,0.00076307345,0.33731785],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867487,0.00068382313,0.000039719456,0.000119974524,0.00032791155,0.0001536829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972378,0.0020700253,0.00014815442,0.000069696594,0.0001606072,0.0003137195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016515552,0.00060897315,0.0004795541,0.0011704542,0.0038650925,0.007050453,0.0011286219,0.0029246162,0.005525802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035708195,0.00023320454,0.0004393279,0.001271292,0.0044993814,0.0052549415,0.0050260527,0.006423563,0.0013293846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031709016,0.00036498962,0.0010411374,0.0011923154,0.000012764867,0.00027287673,0.07904975,0.0005418445,0.0013480985,0.30452004,0.2616006,0.35002387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013773387,0.00010617797,0.0021385713,0.0015013976,0.000015701975,0.00058321975,0.03171044,0.00059185777,0.0011402185,0.05833203,0.9038398,0.000026761285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017033637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046748263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007050453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024953387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038324308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018485606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418654276","doi":"10.29173/alr464","title":"Opportunities for Public Participation in the Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing Operations in Alberta","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Business; Petroleum engineering; Geology","score_opus":0.20045208898901895,"score_gpt":0.3270005756893281,"score_spread":0.12654848670030916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418654276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21848102,0.011834822,0.003721519,0.13624345,0.0006577224,0.00012165567,0.00010781581,0.00009233803,0.62873966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616314,0.0023391475,0.0006899732,0.0075505404,0.00012828837,0.000029072704,0.000024967696,0.000013785645,0.027592769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862639,0.004300994,0.00030860436,0.0007406895,0.0048713787,0.0035144843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769081,0.017260496,0.0009999173,0.000569482,0.003327279,0.0009347648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015584863,0.00020748429,0.0002748561,0.0018389374,0.017762728,0.01057188,0.0025554858,0.0063209827,0.0033372114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013772275,0.00040075183,0.00032916397,0.00194934,0.017129641,0.00211119,0.004125326,0.0047001005,0.00017411697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006645081,0.000062744206,0.0042180046,0.00030281147,0.000018425855,0.0016787664,0.07428783,0.0016560481,0.0018476658,0.846018,0.02750816,0.04233506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007528707,0.00010519847,0.032762595,0.0013418031,0.00013890502,0.00045405427,0.14724246,0.0019257257,0.002690674,0.09653385,0.7164882,0.00024127131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85926324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93419063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14073676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07460056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10067415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5412675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469754430","doi":"","title":"“True Stories,” Real Lives: Canada Reads 2012 and the Effects of Reading Memoir in Public","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Reading (process); Theme (computing); Realm; Entertainment industry; Entertainment; Literature; Media studies; Close reading; Power (physics); Sociology; History; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science; Visual arts; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07508579814726075,"score_gpt":0.2536113029181619,"score_spread":0.17852550477090118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469754430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5660552,0.0029641194,0.0006144889,0.05256644,0.0010000895,0.000072538314,0.00043988158,0.0001748728,0.37611243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750064,0.0006063661,0.00016992074,0.0034120167,0.00012367597,0.00004215953,0.00010069332,0.00010860965,0.020430168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927913,0.003777151,0.000061747465,0.00044367055,0.0012921157,0.0016339839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98843807,0.006679319,0.00075989414,0.0005590874,0.0017927366,0.0017709441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038615053,0.0006740472,0.00045520827,0.0014209888,0.03760249,0.017528197,0.0019685023,0.0038117862,0.012391503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017018558,0.00046681293,0.00038422542,0.0022296177,0.024497127,0.005338398,0.0065890383,0.0072203525,0.0008199801],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016530909,0.00015231862,0.003177917,0.00013415958,0.000023007882,0.0008242847,0.9195978,0.00010680732,0.00065059256,0.02500705,0.037762057,0.0123986015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030446481,0.00007088091,0.011443097,0.00015613584,0.00003061874,0.000117675234,0.83659637,0.00009462507,0.000541618,0.0023724094,0.14848492,0.000061174476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7973821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8806294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20261788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04312758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023185086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40762228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470574744","doi":"10.3138/ecf.2016.28.4.746","title":"<i>The Animal Claim: Sensibility and the Creaturely Voice</i> by Tobias Menely","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.013594625697992736,"score_gpt":0.2062843876391351,"score_spread":0.19268976194114235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470574744","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007832782,0.10671967,0.0027734544,0.6509488,0.021347629,0.00003287196,0.0001054108,0.00010094357,0.21013843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.404268,0.04070131,0.0019339598,0.20901829,0.03831382,0.00016502445,0.00010295184,0.0006895878,0.3048071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984547,0.0009522092,0.000036940597,0.00020441091,0.00022150602,0.00013022998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967673,0.0025890714,0.00015583697,0.0001126502,0.00024676294,0.0001284222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023003935,0.0008360676,0.00065550074,0.001266781,0.007582694,0.007094104,0.0010538438,0.0052490723,0.00494402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059409454,0.0002910519,0.00024766815,0.00089781225,0.022547128,0.008112582,0.004136352,0.01107085,0.0018689913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026538282,0.000014586154,0.00011730598,0.000117441305,0.000008825882,0.00013555262,0.030537935,0.000059142756,0.00017515918,0.6251024,0.33720216,0.0065029184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000769222,0.000013322079,0.00016704222,0.00042347374,0.000006691349,0.00021460022,0.010317633,0.00008548957,0.00028466454,0.06703885,0.9214205,0.000019900639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005946842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00861943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007582694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028335373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012986128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020558774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480294391","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-6122-6.ch012","title":"Ethics, Media, and Reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interconnectivity; Possession (linguistics); Function (biology); Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Globalization; Ethics of technology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Meta-ethics; Social science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.025864654905471848,"score_gpt":0.272029875584674,"score_spread":0.24616522067920216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480294391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025664952,0.043187536,0.008523009,0.017236194,0.0013682616,0.000038018177,0.000032698103,0.000060060145,0.92698777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35802284,0.063147105,0.017220987,0.015056067,0.0042193336,0.0003081361,0.00019344193,0.0002712036,0.54156095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972727,0.0016003122,0.000070067246,0.00020369983,0.000723536,0.00012975886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974293,0.0020619412,0.00010209539,0.00012373092,0.00020647117,0.00007644564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022513554,0.00067601964,0.00038771628,0.0018265984,0.0037514195,0.008782985,0.0008400384,0.0022141112,0.008181152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00406817,0.0002487684,0.00023118881,0.0013759814,0.022983473,0.0076934146,0.0027296254,0.0037861662,0.0016585055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024571636,0.000005288889,0.00002767076,0.00005850988,0.0000012191505,0.000037111564,0.003224753,0.0000998778,0.00005143608,0.97716683,0.009230297,0.010094499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041721623,0.0000067927726,0.00012862193,0.0005921972,0.0000025533825,0.00011709239,0.0025660386,0.00018218573,0.00015174414,0.5559808,0.44026056,0.000007277553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021798126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020838918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008782985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036527384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035196634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027368665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485805819","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521860543.009","title":"The politics of rhetorical education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Excellence; Politics; Summit; Cicero; Rhetorical device; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Aesthetics; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.049147089776874646,"score_gpt":0.22462884160938,"score_spread":0.17548175183250533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485805819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005527604,0.019282747,0.0050368416,0.03287938,0.0007786838,0.000010036147,0.000021143192,0.000060255486,0.93640333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.817649,0.011615633,0.0033972196,0.009317389,0.0026789226,0.00008861125,0.00004614309,0.00015303293,0.155054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957509,0.002774455,0.000069490605,0.00027683916,0.00082921365,0.00029911904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956281,0.0035548536,0.00017014393,0.00021706027,0.00029662962,0.00013317486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038801525,0.00042128828,0.0003341623,0.00197122,0.0050826166,0.0108163925,0.00070761534,0.0028020819,0.0046921927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064329985,0.0002120242,0.00018771489,0.0014739591,0.033494897,0.0076349047,0.002347314,0.00540468,0.0012734819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018116991,0.0000024344642,0.000011851542,0.000012556845,3.3281228e-7,0.000010044154,0.0018291477,0.000022995397,0.000017286506,0.9917425,0.0031467543,0.0032022432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007996557,0.00000918483,0.0001400858,0.00027206136,0.0000020800094,0.00006938692,0.0023790738,0.0002734885,0.00019851088,0.65415716,0.34248456,0.0000063727357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017839652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017674387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108163925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006432618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032931014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046672165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495551685","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316181645","title":"The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Audience reception; Rhetoric; Sociology; Ambivalence; Focus (optics); Psychology; Social psychology; Media studies; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.060954005086340364,"score_gpt":0.21303855160832927,"score_spread":0.1520845465219889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495551685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047031706,0.046143994,0.045023292,0.031870168,0.002208739,0.000050697883,0.000036917805,0.000079147554,0.8698839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66963714,0.05207418,0.032220576,0.010972636,0.0057454263,0.0005599182,0.00012640082,0.00042475486,0.22823891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888364,0.008304024,0.00021635545,0.0005455412,0.0016564258,0.0004412973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905856,0.008000094,0.00035183196,0.00035826984,0.00047229754,0.00023186025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074684476,0.001068719,0.0008931958,0.0030085878,0.005386578,0.014172972,0.001866107,0.0060733035,0.007089171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009883107,0.0005024962,0.0007963489,0.002824126,0.040128965,0.017246753,0.004648323,0.00787291,0.0022218134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005679848,0.000004588054,0.00003249419,0.00008289014,0.000003470363,0.00005002594,0.0047676084,0.00006956869,0.00006189368,0.98607373,0.0030990343,0.005748958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011027885,0.000015903388,0.00010236863,0.00039040318,0.0000061005935,0.00014929673,0.002804034,0.00021947168,0.000105544146,0.84163684,0.15455148,0.000007473598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064487866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074528536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014172972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004861882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002669359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039497375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496598127","doi":"10.3138/topia.35.107","title":"Troublesome Indigestion: The “Return” of Omar Khadr and Post-Racial Politics of Citizenship in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; The Imaginary; Identity (music); Racism; Homecoming; Law; Sociology; State (computer science); Gender studies; Political science; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.05566521859730512,"score_gpt":0.24687661128814636,"score_spread":0.19121139269084125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496598127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240753,0.0023312564,0.00015330057,0.024182945,0.00016217545,0.000025922049,0.00015567905,0.000022279726,0.048891198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906255,0.00073177164,0.00007382386,0.00183586,0.000017355327,0.0000052071937,0.00003568881,0.000018424855,0.0066563184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972361,0.00034090292,0.00003717326,0.00017897188,0.0006880587,0.0015188481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975666,0.00043608344,0.00030593347,0.000070959664,0.00072927406,0.00089108467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015901333,0.00030074076,0.00042111418,0.0013560983,0.04311792,0.009752476,0.0016596359,0.0024759127,0.004106767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029937043,0.00030360924,0.00026787916,0.0027609395,0.019330436,0.0022324678,0.005830594,0.0047950987,0.00026131835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099497774,0.000040730312,0.024175046,0.000109113746,0.000021055796,0.0024707331,0.90970904,0.00011571349,0.0011478071,0.03694054,0.013640266,0.011530404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048592588,0.0000112105345,0.023749216,0.00009802647,0.00001253936,0.0002573468,0.9114246,0.0000960752,0.0002699475,0.0007490712,0.063269615,0.000057378315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11137767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11137767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09444164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80810535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496724065","doi":"10.1075/dapsac.55.07wes","title":"The Qualitative Analysis of Political Documents","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Politics; Trustworthiness; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Perspective (graphical); Discipline; Task (project management); Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Political science; Epistemology; Data science; Social science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.16260373757104973,"score_gpt":0.34647413067473914,"score_spread":0.1838703931036894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496724065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17083772,0.005714399,0.19120407,0.042558227,0.0013195968,0.00868001,0.0119923875,0.00037848405,0.5673151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75125927,0.0058994056,0.11412135,0.0042665335,0.00031022602,0.01074439,0.0026958035,0.00033094388,0.11037211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97325224,0.018479906,0.0006785869,0.000971725,0.0058356794,0.00078184024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481618,0.038711254,0.001761943,0.0024213574,0.008034843,0.0009088486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026263896,0.00041510916,0.0005483804,0.004490795,0.006117175,0.00899271,0.0015693987,0.0009975705,0.008363949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044977542,0.000342839,0.00030671377,0.007532961,0.010374074,0.0041127857,0.003909439,0.0018612443,0.0016681419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049090166,0.000045937028,0.0020018322,0.0012309605,0.000008725796,0.00027861193,0.4743367,0.0004718545,0.0019060434,0.41777152,0.019381838,0.082516834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002126564,0.000035170757,0.002053015,0.0023832635,0.000009131447,0.00024079267,0.35306883,0.00078149524,0.0021754105,0.08417992,0.5550044,0.000047232646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019747915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019694246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026263896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012098414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017591909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13889837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497747648","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511676246.011","title":"What men quote by: Tolstoy, wise sayings, and moral tales","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.039472926452725585,"score_gpt":0.19943147691506363,"score_spread":0.15995855046233803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497747648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006998691,0.04898848,0.0035498282,0.24025452,0.019993786,0.000043643246,0.00045614003,0.0001540979,0.6795609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07763857,0.01149344,0.00093706214,0.04093748,0.0042417846,0.000043012074,0.00014147544,0.0002693965,0.86429775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994692,0.00019855482,0.000018593368,0.00008324461,0.00015719161,0.000073312774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935406,0.0002940894,0.00006206099,0.00003943754,0.0001490502,0.000101333484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007428016,0.0005831459,0.00033503026,0.0010095759,0.005031557,0.005252537,0.00043928102,0.0021877058,0.026310692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028614304,0.00025792082,0.00022186292,0.0012678909,0.005568544,0.006776093,0.0020013007,0.0041467813,0.0069785705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021819313,0.000016694099,0.00031238617,0.00012410693,0.0000073419124,0.000101029174,0.017026916,0.000050970702,0.00014072402,0.24185987,0.7204232,0.019915048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028903828,0.0000055739843,0.00041475068,0.00014034682,0.0000026098865,0.00011647305,0.006443713,0.000030542054,0.00017796234,0.013507439,0.97915024,0.000007472499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014773215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03977484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026310692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023957915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021293287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503708994","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521860543.012","title":"Rhetoric and the Roman Republic","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Passions; Hyperbole; Power (physics); History; Literature; Law; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Metaphor; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03962136649337158,"score_gpt":0.19462227636538207,"score_spread":0.15500090987201048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503708994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00849117,0.014351551,0.00084393605,0.006427112,0.0003579859,0.000008110907,0.000013166231,0.00001962766,0.9694873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8402584,0.008801595,0.0010885578,0.0045450106,0.000755356,0.00005556544,0.000036704103,0.000078786645,0.14438002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974031,0.0016982786,0.000055155146,0.00017271024,0.00039148005,0.0002791375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928087,0.00045747502,0.00007604041,0.00006840462,0.00006621561,0.00005101432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018119963,0.0005223941,0.00038413238,0.001429789,0.007673576,0.0074441615,0.00060761103,0.0016416876,0.0058139698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030247534,0.00024159071,0.00018282015,0.0014702708,0.021345587,0.0040554376,0.00320007,0.0034662574,0.00164624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008438166,0.00001058789,0.00006856494,0.00005164342,0.0000010254919,0.000095956995,0.014883161,0.00004783119,0.00007829467,0.96615225,0.0075140595,0.011088213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016288639,0.000029498573,0.0005916443,0.000648496,0.0000042466822,0.00036996359,0.011071792,0.0002187471,0.00036929542,0.17216967,0.81449586,0.000014489985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001697004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001863793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007673576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004273535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023048304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031006813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509172424","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i2.4672","title":"Studying Rhetorical Audiences – a Call for Qualitative Reception Studies in Argumentation and Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Conceptualization; Empirical research; Empirical examination; Sociology; Rhetorical device; Visual rhetoric; Persuasion; Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.36684443306193315,"score_gpt":0.4265013016066305,"score_spread":0.05965686854469737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509172424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4176331,0.019892298,0.2330091,0.1374872,0.004086322,0.0060458854,0.0014000206,0.00035931126,0.18008672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299204,0.0036152075,0.03472006,0.010962495,0.000659761,0.005672412,0.00033465715,0.0002933283,0.013821608],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87827706,0.108875014,0.0022201575,0.002970997,0.0055762744,0.0020804878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70915914,0.25476417,0.009061541,0.0104517555,0.012402656,0.0041607963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1305289,0.000703687,0.0014263014,0.00577265,0.009317105,0.01408147,0.0034165746,0.0038095016,0.012824945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12935504,0.00079746975,0.00089279126,0.0047729816,0.029718699,0.02608027,0.011020517,0.0053621694,0.001542153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101338126,0.00023678479,0.0026755051,0.0014313759,0.000024819981,0.00033850028,0.82669955,0.00014209261,0.0016756124,0.1286038,0.0038840296,0.034186635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006564813,0.00017895746,0.0027484286,0.0036556425,0.000019379546,0.00041378965,0.75410235,0.0006023909,0.0009051734,0.12522838,0.11199735,0.000082507526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016663634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025313993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1305289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063956073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005945326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6903111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510017249","doi":"","title":"“The Suitable Language of Love”: Confessional Discourse in By Grand Central Station I Sat Down and Wept","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Canadian Literature","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confessional; Confession (law); Rhetorical question; Ambiguity; Rhetoric; Sociology; Pleasure; Plot (graphics); Aesthetics; Literature; Law; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Politics; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.013610353055878311,"score_gpt":0.27789434821910336,"score_spread":0.26428399516322504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510017249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28112838,0.005259023,0.007050729,0.07668856,0.0010573048,0.00007934866,0.00011741014,0.0001403441,0.62847894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820208,0.00067255454,0.0005840606,0.0012407027,0.0000711375,0.000021715707,0.000018273875,0.00006315568,0.015307622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961643,0.002320074,0.00005852339,0.0002762137,0.00063997775,0.0005408904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583226,0.002414455,0.00026966585,0.00025557246,0.00065768935,0.00057035964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00399945,0.00051503367,0.00042071418,0.0012942916,0.02252475,0.008650718,0.001160618,0.002598439,0.0043448647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008910857,0.00034732014,0.00019540342,0.0017547172,0.03331779,0.0048725936,0.0047610323,0.0044089686,0.00043715895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021396718,0.000006482243,0.00019414249,0.000048994116,0.0000026358664,0.00037458574,0.7900779,0.00003926027,0.0004347882,0.19477774,0.009599148,0.0044228863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009631815,0.000020718808,0.0009239694,0.00022454822,0.000008340921,0.00041520727,0.6386995,0.00017977029,0.0008255914,0.013031747,0.345629,0.00003207468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18904327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2908949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18904327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027432691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014073146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37588584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510247332","doi":"10.4000/communication.6918","title":"Kirsten KOZOLANKA (dir.) (2014), Publicity and the Canadian State. Critical Communications Perspectives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Publicity; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.051789688401954206,"score_gpt":0.2756073623956681,"score_spread":0.22381767399371388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510247332","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017179826,0.70480496,0.00059482374,0.21368836,0.0071699233,0.000020043326,0.0005174944,0.00004493868,0.07144151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1119851,0.64542145,0.0011001527,0.030659568,0.0045964364,0.0000839075,0.0003674949,0.00022538978,0.20556045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998536,0.00029268966,0.000059181657,0.00018234643,0.00058895664,0.0003408553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998514,0.0005407359,0.00012681024,0.00005007673,0.0005479861,0.00022035548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017917627,0.0010107919,0.00064841897,0.002949906,0.012506943,0.00957719,0.0017512601,0.0054743215,0.023493765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038621288,0.00072216126,0.00033332137,0.006078314,0.01046432,0.007955335,0.0023520265,0.004628299,0.00524672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004375512,0.00001660407,0.0007467587,0.000509759,0.00001106077,0.00017771477,0.012959766,0.00015839643,0.00016161452,0.20942777,0.7090985,0.06668829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006079402,0.000003320922,0.0023825953,0.0007196444,0.000008371528,0.00006604414,0.0068757976,0.000061029834,0.000095718664,0.020997008,0.9687534,0.000030981642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.891033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9497614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108967006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047293726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04109214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34314156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516493043","doi":"10.3138/cras.2016.003","title":"La télévision publique aux États-Unis à un tournant de son histoire : vers une résurgence ?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.03853005078804817,"score_gpt":0.29791697837431663,"score_spread":0.25938692758626847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516493043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12502961,0.15620402,0.0011300639,0.22355804,0.0041411184,0.000017812203,0.00013263678,0.000056759727,0.48972997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8594556,0.05211971,0.0004715483,0.011242928,0.0021578649,0.000032550735,0.000052744643,0.000059770584,0.0744073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854016,0.0005871365,0.000031211996,0.00015099159,0.00032668537,0.00036392428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964868,0.00210191,0.00034984422,0.00019240049,0.00052905217,0.00033995265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028412233,0.00025670475,0.00027814842,0.0020458933,0.006792926,0.008214226,0.0005369045,0.0020737168,0.00856462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004909807,0.00019644377,0.0001731775,0.0040143044,0.012274443,0.006721747,0.00205661,0.005218868,0.00079183857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006657555,0.00003833627,0.0025846083,0.00042700957,0.000011617002,0.0003114478,0.124486975,0.000055947243,0.0006183663,0.7637281,0.045390174,0.062280867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012677098,0.000026595166,0.009194855,0.0010880646,0.000020410367,0.00017063106,0.07063544,0.000050878854,0.000436011,0.011426028,0.9069239,0.000014514141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10311344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1488194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10311344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013142641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102546355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2050265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516908666","doi":"","title":"A word in your ear: The speech is the poetry of politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meanjin","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Art; Cricket; Politics; Art history; Visual arts; History; Literature; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16339288220185744,"score_gpt":0.2990049483490531,"score_spread":0.13561206614719568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516908666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03435452,0.011828981,0.0044791005,0.09400556,0.006962692,0.000014593939,0.0000857417,0.00028130223,0.8479874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78077865,0.0033351122,0.0010300267,0.009640179,0.0020489814,0.000027858,0.000047196867,0.00033144295,0.2027604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990274,0.00060224807,0.000018711395,0.00007806266,0.00016660817,0.000106997264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.0004921261,0.00008081221,0.00010128237,0.00013186717,0.00012671809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008678094,0.0002663105,0.00020793742,0.0004634121,0.00795823,0.006305249,0.00028467533,0.0011358563,0.01068825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033412105,0.00016890478,0.00014676817,0.00070538913,0.01191748,0.0035613733,0.0016218957,0.0033705877,0.0037517261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007409654,0.00001778814,0.0009607557,0.00013075207,0.0000096338335,0.0004885187,0.14200947,0.00004948073,0.0013243693,0.54754984,0.26619878,0.041186463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004966451,0.000015915604,0.0010613217,0.00012777888,0.00000516846,0.00031152883,0.038189445,0.000045282562,0.0004014934,0.012570037,0.94725585,0.000011261643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021376438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00391868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01068825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011845124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009949565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035755754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520212918","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2016v41n3a3181","title":"Essence, Absence, Uselessness: Engaging Non-Euro-American Rhetorics Interologically","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anecdote; Contextualization; Humanities; Rhetoric; Philosophy; Sociology; Art; Literature; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics","score_opus":0.035260168572508716,"score_gpt":0.23976982274109862,"score_spread":0.2045096541685899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520212918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6543982,0.0066641555,0.030688591,0.01248818,0.0007966462,0.00009365777,0.000052298048,0.000121332385,0.29469696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307925,0.00040483594,0.0010651242,0.00025733418,0.00004929901,0.000020888852,0.000010905107,0.00003199918,0.005080442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944727,0.0044240425,0.0001067247,0.00029548712,0.00037182987,0.0003292997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996302,0.0028587077,0.00019464645,0.00028739814,0.00019736015,0.00015977089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005451534,0.00066913426,0.0005358607,0.0014255322,0.0059340387,0.0068945857,0.00066200655,0.0012921897,0.0020782482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005572633,0.00029216005,0.00022355744,0.001659936,0.020429298,0.006774078,0.0052148667,0.0029193482,0.00016527963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060102284,0.000018232564,0.0012687382,0.00014396108,0.00000985981,0.00045362677,0.60785484,0.00014401544,0.0018711417,0.3758488,0.0008717087,0.01145491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032787593,0.00011749395,0.005113183,0.00053960463,0.00006710982,0.000832408,0.5379338,0.0014212824,0.002974795,0.104635455,0.3462713,0.00006077535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023801494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004239843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068945857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031879232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013914388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028830767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528603402","doi":"","title":"\"CANADIANIZING\" AN AMERICAN COMMUNICATION TEXTBOOK","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Ideology; Discipline; Humanities; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.292132979387066,"score_gpt":0.4017910828182133,"score_spread":0.10965810343114729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528603402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014494884,0.010182157,0.00050437904,0.03088923,0.0031096202,0.000042974283,0.0010288175,0.00026740698,0.9394805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15947527,0.010440551,0.001409047,0.004963387,0.00053483783,0.00003732266,0.0011354493,0.00020313753,0.821801],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926597,0.00008949112,0.000017391483,0.000077511366,0.00040454097,0.00014511278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998346,0.00018754543,0.00005582919,0.00004948584,0.0011195166,0.00024157723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048517177,0.0004739887,0.00019120857,0.0020930455,0.008609307,0.004434605,0.00067746727,0.00089658005,0.035182785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022492765,0.00013284925,0.00013540983,0.004473605,0.0030094918,0.0012166817,0.00095111236,0.0019815369,0.0046938458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024112773,0.000022696702,0.00085325824,0.00012661076,0.0000020073915,0.00017976339,0.0139288185,0.00009765134,0.00063899625,0.084198445,0.81426203,0.085665636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010108251,0.0000026488815,0.0011372892,0.000058233007,0.0000019886124,0.000020839974,0.0024748875,0.000026347461,0.00008222546,0.00044932193,0.99573994,0.00000528582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93601084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9704432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06398916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045153003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048444707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32760954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532198420","doi":"10.1130/abs/2016am-287746","title":"FIRE AND BRIMSTONE AND FORT MCMURRAY: CONSIDERING THE IMPLICATIONS OF APOCALYPTIC RHETORIC IN CLIMATE COMMUNICATION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Computer science; Computer security; Architectural engineering; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04768464945211616,"score_gpt":0.2655721855818508,"score_spread":0.21788753612973466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532198420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022913663,0.006356005,0.002522642,0.7541224,0.0031501167,0.000018984909,0.000027434697,0.000025308082,0.21086338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89626545,0.0026843506,0.0010285085,0.0716713,0.0026027334,0.000063850704,0.0000120636905,0.000082652674,0.025589202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920622,0.005705431,0.00012661662,0.0005521641,0.0009312946,0.0006222934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643159,0.030790355,0.0012703792,0.0006011119,0.0018624474,0.0011598697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015448735,0.00044826625,0.00049241673,0.0013357035,0.019396262,0.014148688,0.0021171453,0.015503808,0.0131856175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050646104,0.0003566973,0.0002514106,0.0015334842,0.0340949,0.016825292,0.005311477,0.01815165,0.0009106242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003473752,0.000014460466,0.00018919083,0.00005128138,0.0000050912467,0.00017309346,0.06472823,0.00006030909,0.00009131168,0.8907346,0.038799886,0.0051178806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073800205,0.00003397814,0.0010473717,0.0007047299,0.00002757507,0.00022929262,0.13469686,0.00054677407,0.00072267296,0.41922808,0.4426255,0.00006344477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02118454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02079956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97881544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008506958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066805687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081701696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547684140","doi":"10.1353/pmc.2016.0010","title":"Introduction: Toward a Theory of Resource Aesthetics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postmodern Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Headline; Nagging; History; Archaeology; Sociology; Psychology; Advertising; Social psychology","score_opus":0.039663268358539,"score_gpt":0.23437604955162064,"score_spread":0.19471278119308164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547684140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037652773,0.006952984,0.03514997,0.05559005,0.001769932,0.000048506747,0.00027348078,0.00011055072,0.8963393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5611943,0.0143617485,0.0544519,0.026024166,0.0075880927,0.00051162386,0.00070770265,0.0006301939,0.33453035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828464,0.00081163546,0.000061677085,0.00029513412,0.00039842003,0.00014852933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984831,0.00081887655,0.000102304475,0.00014135249,0.00031768388,0.00013676111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018200281,0.00078299025,0.00046217823,0.0016534769,0.0038605512,0.007112082,0.0017880081,0.0033803068,0.029692126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028169064,0.00036459733,0.0011043025,0.001613029,0.018336821,0.011646857,0.002547143,0.0058860946,0.0055029946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022832992,0.0000069273347,0.000060516875,0.000018641014,0.0000012624712,0.000017782784,0.0007954372,0.00013832832,0.000021778886,0.9842449,0.012228325,0.0024637207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029170542,0.0000062113972,0.00019620536,0.000112494636,0.0000019074416,0.000069210626,0.0011300098,0.00044072382,0.000028837967,0.8075324,0.1904706,0.000008430478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059886635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050415043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029692126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005760222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016157458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09933001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553667131","doi":"","title":"The role of Twitter in legitimating the Energy East Pipeline, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway))","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige Universitet","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.018887404322235544,"score_gpt":0.21901975349726416,"score_spread":0.20013234917502862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553667131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64794856,0.0019141049,0.0023055454,0.046202287,0.00035333206,0.0001393526,0.0009247078,0.000158612,0.30005357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725519,0.00080847315,0.0004938335,0.00087515544,0.000024442195,0.000020863932,0.00014071052,0.000038621736,0.025046082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970312,0.00050245225,0.00007066463,0.00027593778,0.0011645978,0.0009551651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472684,0.0021392035,0.0003740026,0.0001928657,0.0016391365,0.00092798506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024539172,0.00028553783,0.00026707942,0.0019049413,0.026954267,0.012394339,0.0011870147,0.0012706424,0.0073649893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009606993,0.00028859213,0.00024431385,0.0039223633,0.0070689674,0.003954851,0.004743304,0.0017736776,0.00045876158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005158583,0.00009300324,0.09049026,0.0006885168,0.00006806956,0.0038061622,0.43854147,0.0024259775,0.0049817716,0.23623036,0.063000776,0.1591578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023678553,0.000046558143,0.062652305,0.0004051541,0.000056804336,0.00014738436,0.38283223,0.0027249171,0.0024194508,0.009107683,0.53943545,0.00014833419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07875294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07875294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11065211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5713953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557104099","doi":"10.3138/cras.2015.012","title":"Re-Reading the Portrait and the Archive’s Social Memory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portrait; Dialogical self; George (robot); Reading (process); Subject (documents); Kinship; Bridge (graph theory); Art history; Art; Sociology; History; Literature; Anthropology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.05257826203074111,"score_gpt":0.28853887825446084,"score_spread":0.23596061622371972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557104099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3144494,0.007637305,0.00670225,0.022220144,0.001652578,0.00002966887,0.00007231685,0.00011441746,0.6471219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668122,0.0016246916,0.001031575,0.0006999777,0.00028995276,0.000007694022,0.000038532307,0.00008742902,0.029407905],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987,0.00067591044,0.000031435764,0.00014932857,0.00030179988,0.00014150755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975649,0.0012678319,0.00020970292,0.00043114382,0.00031562804,0.00021090388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002267816,0.0002882638,0.00022505278,0.0017953373,0.0069968677,0.0070550945,0.0008725251,0.0014806371,0.007696681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005500422,0.00017245575,0.0002095038,0.0009083187,0.01647379,0.0087241335,0.0046128267,0.0031251826,0.0008083135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004454336,0.000021016027,0.0014269034,0.00008722673,0.000010562455,0.0009225226,0.7815198,0.00009604956,0.0016162429,0.16936731,0.008511886,0.036375973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011878189,0.000050695475,0.0032034542,0.00038018078,0.000024609739,0.0014547636,0.384326,0.00019832472,0.0011462589,0.031865552,0.5773121,0.00002610834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057975356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012376917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007696681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002878426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014260963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025748014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558873071","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.7","title":"From Epistemic Responsibility to Ecological Thinking: The Importance of Advocacy for Epistemic Community","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Epistemology; Sociology; Work (physics); Process (computing); Politics; Epistemic community; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.07689017530132941,"score_gpt":0.2973565669653361,"score_spread":0.22046639166400667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558873071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0372461,0.010358578,0.11025764,0.2769671,0.002811258,0.00007919363,0.000041521784,0.00011374307,0.56212485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594348,0.0035861763,0.009121011,0.011797945,0.0011975876,0.000170949,0.000026059564,0.00015411996,0.01451138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804411,0.012990863,0.00042096214,0.0012820982,0.0035633903,0.0013015447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662614,0.024622936,0.0021047508,0.0025185046,0.002781487,0.0017109644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014958281,0.00047297883,0.0006923058,0.002133902,0.0116002215,0.017779624,0.0018285051,0.007100482,0.004707666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029147673,0.0003624088,0.00080907985,0.0019148818,0.068270124,0.02559799,0.015036731,0.009983005,0.00071197597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005375234,0.000007799037,0.00017247291,0.000035224104,0.0000023695923,0.00005712265,0.010205867,0.0000703193,0.000024627234,0.9842717,0.0018025156,0.0033446837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007913545,0.000008767753,0.00021565215,0.00020424857,0.0000049970586,0.000109092885,0.009119491,0.00025699043,0.00012159934,0.9049736,0.08496538,0.000012205367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030565306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00291992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017779624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007455635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008496633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07910788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560295250","doi":"10.3138/utq.85.4.1","title":"Meeting Our Publics: A Search for the Right Questions in Public Humanities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Political science; Humanities; Public relations; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.0568037364424039,"score_gpt":0.24334077895091286,"score_spread":0.18653704250850894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560295250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027975442,0.0141724255,0.0029814057,0.8149907,0.0013392039,0.000038054215,0.00013598749,0.00007382231,0.13829291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950411,0.006198855,0.001400843,0.02357027,0.0014220363,0.000048746864,0.00006845944,0.00016459382,0.01671524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98311436,0.011532358,0.0004686451,0.0010531164,0.0018057689,0.0020257568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459856,0.039094824,0.0036959501,0.0024944262,0.0033440925,0.0053851404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020094197,0.0006057907,0.0010674547,0.0042041377,0.04222914,0.033067204,0.002590048,0.013664578,0.019954152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04471681,0.0009662736,0.00042128903,0.007127426,0.08928157,0.0345437,0.011413668,0.018026732,0.0014167392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032606862,0.000019111016,0.00088440994,0.00020875665,0.0000059865456,0.00030009286,0.24608941,0.00009773568,0.00013434788,0.67845035,0.06326252,0.010514664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033402972,0.000015709142,0.001856159,0.00075204414,0.00002051809,0.00016034958,0.34817693,0.00031000646,0.00022738037,0.20028995,0.44811448,0.000043118747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22264694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2758736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22264694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05175413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045767445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.442702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560487102","doi":"10.3138/utq.85.4.12","title":"In Search of Peace: Public Humanities and the Face in Creative Arts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spectacle; The arts; Exhibition; Situated; Argument (complex analysis); Face (sociological concept); Visual arts; Media studies; Comedy; Humanities; Art; Sociology; History; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04960831775916285,"score_gpt":0.23104464079905176,"score_spread":0.1814363230398889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560487102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062263552,0.01779345,0.0069349906,0.08015042,0.0015612049,0.00004417638,0.00004733133,0.000067077206,0.8311378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700023,0.0028613112,0.00087050116,0.0039578346,0.00068496313,0.0000350241,0.000013021168,0.00004999709,0.021525046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589866,0.0028730715,0.000050624512,0.00021776915,0.00041378243,0.00054611394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962769,0.0026538623,0.00032971692,0.00023298609,0.00018099815,0.00032549447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004025175,0.00053316733,0.00035555774,0.0019745615,0.020458456,0.015122608,0.0010623382,0.0041401386,0.008997878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005579949,0.00021584032,0.00030027376,0.0016485999,0.05835257,0.009989817,0.007269585,0.0045995754,0.00068391155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016343985,0.000010853252,0.00028701185,0.00007800448,0.00000337609,0.00029598648,0.180397,0.00006944739,0.00010222231,0.80593985,0.0058633056,0.006936608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017474242,0.000033052023,0.0011267866,0.0005967238,0.000016583597,0.0006378912,0.3077238,0.00022266989,0.0004634406,0.14599745,0.5431402,0.00002390296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020350551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025351869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020458456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008639055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004262511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06268102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560765686","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-40433-2_3","title":"Tarred and Feathered","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in media and environmental communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Presentation (obstetrics); Visual arts; Scholarship; The arts; Media studies; Stewardship (theology); Dramaturgy; Sociology; Political science; Art; Geography; Cartography; Law","score_opus":0.07408687973850493,"score_gpt":0.2560087690176028,"score_spread":0.18192188927909786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560765686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017087297,0.024792826,0.0020510417,0.031278245,0.0072981208,0.00001658155,0.00010539779,0.00010464063,0.9326444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022883596,0.0045390846,0.0005239476,0.0041312445,0.00063258904,0.0000150120495,0.000041446478,0.00011811924,0.9671149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993581,0.00019482354,0.0000149838,0.00014811939,0.00020002136,0.00008395861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995425,0.00013990018,0.000023425533,0.000077014156,0.00015145382,0.00006575049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000784777,0.00060812983,0.000377481,0.0014514026,0.004675425,0.0055910624,0.00066916295,0.0022157065,0.069023095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027480482,0.00027911805,0.0002149117,0.0010975155,0.005453313,0.00491542,0.0025695392,0.003043944,0.021040019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017283304,0.000013734399,0.00010615009,0.000053921267,0.0000018201378,0.000059243972,0.0037546435,0.000052198327,0.00009690484,0.6041996,0.3396042,0.05204029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013206164,0.000002722769,0.00005380757,0.00008152813,7.532156e-7,0.00003871897,0.0007733591,0.000018088693,0.000043552845,0.02053322,0.97845066,0.0000023712025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007972675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018996561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069023095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027460756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002054289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2309053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561687299","doi":"10.15173/mjc.v8i0.260","title":"‘That Worries Me’: Affective and Rhetorical Framing in News Programming of The O’Reilly Factor","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The McMaster Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Rhetorical question; Media studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Art; History; Literature","score_opus":0.057249416845562534,"score_gpt":0.26047567778325986,"score_spread":0.20322626093769733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561687299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36019984,0.002062307,0.023321778,0.02847691,0.00082389987,0.00012597031,0.000036716694,0.00013979047,0.5848129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885554,0.00027607553,0.0020356309,0.0010562855,0.00013697497,0.000046508103,0.000010074624,0.000095955635,0.0074869716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833422,0.0134541,0.00024930295,0.00052476546,0.001702195,0.0007273914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556004,0.03864214,0.0019751987,0.0011754469,0.0016860882,0.0009207743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010932325,0.00067858165,0.00036102036,0.002613208,0.009578293,0.014392188,0.0011573981,0.0029042456,0.0032724072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032929443,0.0006614856,0.0003442342,0.0012297379,0.03599813,0.010706817,0.0070812684,0.0055551515,0.00048313377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006724746,0.000048800226,0.0015927572,0.00011901627,0.000010537577,0.000644293,0.72556007,0.00012247462,0.0012655903,0.2541778,0.0024649624,0.013926326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046029938,0.00010757702,0.0053113005,0.0008443535,0.00006678335,0.001180696,0.6332686,0.001846956,0.004535937,0.122334935,0.23033036,0.0001264188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056124204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065354127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014392188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046237474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027322373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057816386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574603480","doi":"","title":"The Future of Citizen Engagement: An Interview with the Members of the New Brunswick Commission on Hydraulic Fracturing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Elitism; Publics; Government (linguistics); Paternalism; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06061064223830242,"score_gpt":0.2727881973006692,"score_spread":0.2121775550623668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574603480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7584028,0.002706196,0.0020469578,0.17711441,0.0007673524,0.00025096684,0.000108413646,0.000035789504,0.058567133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97657496,0.0011127733,0.0006560963,0.010938334,0.000059523885,0.00016237354,0.00003791363,0.000052778152,0.010405335],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.969384,0.022839746,0.00046330347,0.00075596693,0.0018446154,0.0047124755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722983,0.020521654,0.0012784225,0.0006422096,0.0021024363,0.0031569002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02078972,0.0006357139,0.00077217346,0.0017328671,0.045511432,0.014111438,0.0024102975,0.007924866,0.0030139305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022323413,0.0010233466,0.00048011524,0.0042925123,0.030866424,0.0092694275,0.010879475,0.012990058,0.00040346905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013925669,0.000010865063,0.0006876355,0.000018249308,0.0000013493842,0.00035176394,0.9917386,0.000021807178,0.00022877529,0.0036503875,0.0015509716,0.0017257711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033055783,0.00000657389,0.0003813085,0.000061843995,0.0000013510459,0.00004560317,0.97406447,0.000032487373,0.00006338115,0.00042876592,0.02489914,0.0000117899945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5143612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6034333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4856388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044166513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051587764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576098717","doi":"","title":"(Re)Producing Power: Analyzing the New Brunswick Energy Institute Roundtables1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Value (mathematics); Democracy; Energy (signal processing); Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06426813947125821,"score_gpt":0.26933222795893896,"score_spread":0.20506408848768076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576098717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70356435,0.0029119404,0.009111764,0.010763413,0.0003492623,0.00042191392,0.0048879413,0.00013624517,0.26785326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492192,0.0012097107,0.0042812126,0.00080287433,0.000049563,0.0003266529,0.0025120482,0.00023116155,0.041367467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670297,0.0012878842,0.00013869397,0.0003713279,0.0009443263,0.00055483653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856064,0.009150066,0.0016645236,0.0011378773,0.0018836564,0.0005575748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005905636,0.00033039297,0.0002634191,0.0053157336,0.0051138652,0.0061352365,0.0016085659,0.0008830345,0.009614019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016234439,0.0003342802,0.00014718271,0.010811113,0.0052750427,0.0037074608,0.00392046,0.00185118,0.0012330115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013556995,0.0000517935,0.04048699,0.00047250648,0.000022539549,0.0017908729,0.7536457,0.001123439,0.002893396,0.07871177,0.03455986,0.08610561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007514543,0.000012431261,0.05814394,0.0004418748,0.000007862326,0.00008935941,0.53705287,0.00068325695,0.0012965036,0.004919638,0.39728463,0.000060126295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48004544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6860554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51995456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021095326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013482196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576310859","doi":"10.1332/174426417x14845753387144","title":"Power and culture in emerging medical technology policymaking: the case of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence & Policy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Ideology; Human papillomavirus; Sensemaking; Power (physics); Human papillomavirus vaccine; Political science; Public health; Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Politics; Social science; Gardasil; Cervical cancer; Cancer; Law","score_opus":0.04841556650965913,"score_gpt":0.34854426967293217,"score_spread":0.30012870316327306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576310859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58232355,0.0076400978,0.006352886,0.12650168,0.00045792738,0.00015802705,0.00009079578,0.000039620787,0.27643543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994179,0.00095841166,0.00054503605,0.0014506585,0.000017088418,0.000012782191,0.000008371757,0.0000137640345,0.0028149078],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828203,0.008084563,0.00043783654,0.0009304298,0.0036563068,0.0040706918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743491,0.018632237,0.0012217617,0.00056245754,0.0030376373,0.0021968423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01558705,0.0005700823,0.0006381579,0.002958343,0.058073085,0.023418205,0.0026642075,0.0047680824,0.0035062847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028041134,0.0005176387,0.0005144635,0.0043486436,0.06297311,0.0059719766,0.010601259,0.0072700223,0.00020334417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004216823,0.00003418951,0.004622425,0.00012291831,0.000021089676,0.001830037,0.7072817,0.00086393807,0.00042433574,0.26544064,0.003423041,0.015893491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034543522,0.000025530548,0.0042661414,0.00055148936,0.00004902667,0.00028923847,0.82459706,0.0011277731,0.00066169846,0.046102706,0.122208215,0.00008650557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9617709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96575993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17785388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21587636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.953573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580064402","doi":"10.25200/slj.v5.n2.2016.265","title":"The Editorial and Public Debate. Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sur le journalisme About journalism Sobre jornalismo","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02914706039280573,"score_gpt":0.22594905770428078,"score_spread":0.19680199731147505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580064402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009979807,0.14353423,0.00067399227,0.26095864,0.27623814,0.00005202899,0.00032795832,0.00017891629,0.31703818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039862823,0.059874035,0.0008373869,0.103429,0.5695163,0.00013839832,0.00034827378,0.00027671782,0.225717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912033,0.0032028165,0.00040186476,0.0011947262,0.003272426,0.00072484434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97037786,0.019783864,0.0022176194,0.0011071033,0.0042623533,0.00225109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005233983,0.0010728713,0.00094655063,0.0033503314,0.0045003835,0.015907886,0.0017772042,0.011931284,0.0660798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022009164,0.0007191265,0.0006922883,0.0027421557,0.009603904,0.010089149,0.0031965266,0.008770403,0.019870311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056757275,0.000058013866,0.00013847392,0.0011667174,0.000008853945,0.00010187384,0.0010996548,0.000065581145,0.00020693737,0.14409436,0.8026089,0.05039387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008780986,0.00001592904,0.0003257127,0.0007853312,0.000003481926,0.00006572526,0.00042249015,0.00003089528,0.000039821145,0.022938056,0.97535455,0.00000924585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016627659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020025813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0660798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003932614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045067947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22105896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585064045","doi":"10.3138/utq.86.1.37","title":"Malcolm Lowry's <i>Under the Volcano</i> and the Drunken Discourse of Literary Solipsism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solipsism; Existentialism; Sensibility; Motif (music); Postmodernism; Persuasion; Literature; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Epistemology; Art; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017572785448958107,"score_gpt":0.2206694826104903,"score_spread":0.2030966971615322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585064045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26315635,0.029278427,0.0050977273,0.25881964,0.002553003,0.000032236145,0.00008917916,0.00022507492,0.44074833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690966,0.0018527934,0.00043494807,0.0035508724,0.0003855919,0.000014607132,0.0000105872305,0.00008464935,0.024569249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984836,0.0010444266,0.000020328995,0.00011402799,0.00020079753,0.00013683463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808013,0.0012399959,0.00023162672,0.0001347176,0.00015520667,0.00015833849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001523568,0.0003322677,0.00025948757,0.0006280635,0.0073075085,0.0076038684,0.00065733754,0.0015293136,0.0021277596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004487262,0.00015749347,0.00012762609,0.00040109523,0.023399258,0.0033982832,0.0024774745,0.0041094357,0.0004409546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007477386,0.000016164413,0.0006343921,0.00011492512,0.000008362866,0.00050371926,0.24727543,0.00012541183,0.0006099336,0.6903434,0.049621653,0.010671917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017399983,0.000043824897,0.0018024836,0.00036066244,0.000013036373,0.0007046413,0.09070625,0.00035909808,0.0015905253,0.06473382,0.83963895,0.000029286028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011762424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021650853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011762424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077849217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017848951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056483805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587878400","doi":"10.29173/cais876","title":"Danger: Information Ahead","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Silence; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.033280986581871855,"score_gpt":0.2425954240797789,"score_spread":0.20931443749790707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587878400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041138306,0.0064256145,0.0050104386,0.5807527,0.0129937,0.000044465378,0.00024185426,0.00020261346,0.39021477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2521194,0.009956157,0.002836586,0.2614255,0.010406774,0.0001189774,0.00038029728,0.0004819228,0.4622744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536884,0.0016532196,0.00020504942,0.0004750006,0.0017774944,0.0005204761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99158233,0.004481475,0.0005971127,0.00080130325,0.001659553,0.00087821536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041685672,0.00056375406,0.00046342143,0.0016658035,0.009699047,0.014911314,0.0012284085,0.012273079,0.059634965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019238576,0.0003778394,0.000490267,0.0013666846,0.011311211,0.030648442,0.008374389,0.016182346,0.019275455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029171419,0.00001498413,0.00043070645,0.00010521584,0.000007424179,0.00047440355,0.011530392,0.00006410534,0.00021598836,0.6953416,0.26559782,0.026188206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035029386,0.000012922053,0.00013019607,0.00016789454,0.00000416376,0.00028175695,0.00705956,0.00007384666,0.00013797557,0.08035577,0.9117569,0.000015606533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003426675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003934742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059634965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037716257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048574912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19949883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588732098","doi":"10.29173/cais45","title":"Ghettoes and Diaspora in Classification: Communicating Across the Limits","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Diaspora; Space (punctuation); Limit (mathematics); Rhetorical question; Sociology; Dewey Decimal Classification; Code (set theory); Epistemology; Phenomenon; Feminism; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Programming language; Set (abstract data type); World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07197890123217683,"score_gpt":0.2775700410183411,"score_spread":0.20559113978616428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588732098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19219398,0.0042024218,0.037154123,0.06059879,0.0008314711,0.00010160694,0.00007905893,0.00017392957,0.7046645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98611826,0.0005524543,0.003180776,0.0014907301,0.00009449253,0.00007056823,0.000017398268,0.0000807306,0.008394571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870783,0.010051106,0.0003234539,0.0006785354,0.0010745561,0.000794055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98162246,0.013673476,0.00083555264,0.0019370498,0.0012415312,0.0006898831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014318801,0.00044817507,0.0005275853,0.0033553662,0.014720907,0.012859624,0.0010751704,0.0024574553,0.0043809763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028181951,0.00040130637,0.00030963568,0.0026274696,0.05277642,0.02061863,0.014820004,0.0041651246,0.0004933385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017857265,0.0000074221757,0.0008839841,0.000031532498,0.0000025001216,0.00007915266,0.15068802,0.000042460844,0.00011003279,0.8349281,0.0020864462,0.01112243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001899413,0.000029810804,0.0011993698,0.0005203186,0.000014714976,0.0002405627,0.26405823,0.00070493354,0.0006636324,0.46221578,0.27030516,0.000028583208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012006739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01247618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014720907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006276317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004983232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07572603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591067928","doi":"","title":"INVENTING A DISCIPLINE: RHETORICAL SCHOLARSHIP IN HONOR OF RICHARD E. YOUNG (Editor: Maureen Daly Goggin)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Rhetorical question; Scholarship; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Political science; Law; Computer science; Literature; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.4000464925938606,"score_gpt":0.39808619563402964,"score_spread":0.001960296959830965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591067928","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024121204,0.83801776,0.00068645715,0.12167641,0.0332997,0.000007837198,0.000022482349,0.000027800386,0.0060204323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016286416,0.8129421,0.001773299,0.031389963,0.10517921,0.00004715049,0.00007860337,0.000103634426,0.032199558],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975969,0.0012259521,0.00017539419,0.00018125214,0.00071141426,0.000109112225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989251,0.007397137,0.0005595088,0.00017378425,0.0017250784,0.0008935905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050700908,0.0014623342,0.001661336,0.0046781064,0.0031664607,0.010166078,0.0015827918,0.0063128537,0.0076960255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01138486,0.0008083709,0.00054061593,0.0048772707,0.005720835,0.013276231,0.0026254859,0.006077753,0.0054761157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024576477,0.000014184071,0.000103600476,0.000517694,0.000008514295,0.0001330755,0.0016271621,0.000055952205,0.00007568767,0.012343955,0.92347145,0.061624143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018578596,0.000019123609,0.0005078769,0.0025341082,0.000017383109,0.0004574176,0.0031692234,0.00009228046,0.00010334685,0.025821844,0.96723783,0.000020941454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004862311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013804067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010166078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023377535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035865884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026813507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591721788","doi":"10.1177/0014524616678507","title":"And Finally… On Saving our Bacon(s)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Expository Times","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06478214178864808,"score_gpt":0.2733965931316893,"score_spread":0.2086144513430412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591721788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010915408,0.0034733303,0.0072385035,0.24567436,0.09009183,0.00020829451,0.00031537027,0.0009947087,0.64108807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042726383,0.0005948308,0.003009798,0.03272992,0.005360942,0.00009445669,0.00007892934,0.0006094237,0.9147954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842346,0.0005596106,0.000061682484,0.00015953358,0.00043970905,0.00035610455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973896,0.0004574783,0.00013348136,0.00035327577,0.0010017329,0.00066441944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018152333,0.00086478004,0.00043227308,0.001276339,0.013940536,0.008768062,0.0011279291,0.0044804043,0.09565733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011744087,0.0003512562,0.0007755739,0.00057850184,0.005504038,0.0071728807,0.005298753,0.01296172,0.05425101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010030351,0.00007639426,0.000508567,0.00008063888,0.0000123913305,0.00035423902,0.023137571,0.00004230463,0.0010926693,0.17658226,0.7608019,0.037210785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056775207,0.000014939797,0.00024011977,0.000076214805,0.0000055507953,0.00010054974,0.009622238,0.000026442853,0.0002989878,0.00932332,0.9802626,0.000023351451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012189584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024122972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09565733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021379977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018677358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3200056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593097188","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2017v42n1a3088","title":"“It Won’t Go Viral”: Documenting the Charter of Québec Values and Talking Theory on YouTube","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Storytelling; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Public relations; Legislation; Political science; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Narrative; Law; History; Art","score_opus":0.03717702537365678,"score_gpt":0.2616031412761985,"score_spread":0.22442611590254172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593097188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44525006,0.0039198054,0.015148898,0.09666049,0.0011632477,0.00034997816,0.0014686974,0.0003692264,0.4356696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466973,0.0009594106,0.0028366712,0.0024744296,0.000074625335,0.00011859099,0.00027538624,0.00012487681,0.046438757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609995,0.0022705703,0.000065016175,0.0002739025,0.0007716424,0.00051885785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861866,0.008730173,0.00044711956,0.0005821972,0.003014858,0.0010390028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067043556,0.00040697522,0.00023121593,0.002612531,0.021082075,0.011065546,0.0015889254,0.0020735858,0.008781508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013857731,0.0002517423,0.00022168108,0.002701942,0.01256021,0.005471023,0.0029124706,0.003254973,0.0005836908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045855708,0.000042845797,0.0075111864,0.00017029616,0.000012062436,0.0007283049,0.7352419,0.00036044477,0.0010562001,0.13849887,0.063607365,0.05272469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008644085,0.00002746511,0.008749033,0.00054357044,0.000017686512,0.00013931515,0.56539994,0.0012514102,0.0010118111,0.0062506488,0.4165389,0.00006167451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9317391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9728971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06826091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065478936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040825937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47508514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593486785","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2017v42n1a3091","title":"Pushing the Academy: The Need for Decolonizing Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Privilege (computing); Scholarship; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Commission; Social research; Environmental ethics; Social justice; Media studies; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.43865018783297777,"score_gpt":0.4159898595729962,"score_spread":0.022660328259981544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593486785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063216044,0.024556885,0.007281929,0.93778086,0.0041203056,0.00017366341,0.000027093625,0.00013244188,0.019605216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41930974,0.044311043,0.07702203,0.42535034,0.010072608,0.003074454,0.00015768105,0.0006931855,0.020008968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.75122905,0.18455073,0.009204109,0.018091397,0.026432317,0.010492403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49943376,0.36741608,0.013328178,0.054573793,0.03851648,0.026731735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3125095,0.0013921706,0.0051462203,0.008682082,0.041825525,0.043210395,0.010651828,0.030582776,0.009058131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23918444,0.0017959815,0.0026593262,0.005908853,0.19212815,0.09194786,0.044318087,0.05702756,0.0034049773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071076145,0.0002348109,0.0012515894,0.0023589805,0.00007134658,0.00048549243,0.1899838,0.0003218683,0.00069032115,0.64712125,0.05241874,0.10499074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083870465,0.00013670401,0.0005431442,0.0053446144,0.00003374175,0.0003974876,0.1662366,0.00035878448,0.00038448372,0.45075306,0.37559298,0.00013460682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010402191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014945682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022307787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14917551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84779817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603802153","doi":"10.20381/ruor-18868","title":"Word power: Manifestations of power in the environmental discourse of the Canadian government","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Word (group theory); Government (linguistics); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05136485249756911,"score_gpt":0.27806891556513724,"score_spread":0.22670406306756813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603802153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71303797,0.002465394,0.0046372334,0.013011273,0.00025681494,0.00008617775,0.00024565423,0.00008076896,0.26617873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931677,0.0005770848,0.000586229,0.00019659598,0.00002430716,0.000019221947,0.00003572005,0.000035504454,0.005357691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958378,0.0010441173,0.00011366924,0.00029870044,0.0019429367,0.00076271244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939002,0.0033393204,0.00048146068,0.00020042055,0.0017130605,0.00036549015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034028844,0.0005679798,0.0004465345,0.0053540654,0.01955037,0.012078078,0.0012806632,0.0013030259,0.0036119113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011788643,0.00031276696,0.0002362439,0.007260746,0.031166404,0.0060634646,0.0042118747,0.0025901243,0.00023766587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024062576,0.0000064511664,0.0021638554,0.00006512615,0.0000039055567,0.00023034087,0.9018844,0.000056056433,0.000990126,0.08247735,0.0015795989,0.01051878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062667737,0.000014422743,0.008517888,0.00018850934,0.000019708987,0.00013540976,0.8712467,0.00028339057,0.00094329804,0.010920525,0.1076825,0.000041450898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83864266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84680843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16135734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044329025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041553408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32461518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610219163","doi":"10.21810/strm.v7i1.120","title":"Telling the Fracking Truth: A Pentadic Analysis on the Rhetoric of the LNG Expansion in British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stream Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Government (linguistics); Liquefied natural gas; Natural gas; Political science; Hydraulic fracturing; Natural (archaeology); Public administration; Engineering; Petroleum engineering; Archaeology; History; Art; Waste management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05669972299925268,"score_gpt":0.28945597479193,"score_spread":0.23275625179267734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610219163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9093058,0.0006956569,0.002011695,0.004239629,0.00004136632,0.00006550463,0.00025204854,0.000020924543,0.08336727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942002,0.00022906924,0.00047458368,0.00015157413,0.000006649681,0.000021375185,0.000065237866,0.000017027614,0.004834179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711007,0.001362308,0.00008120343,0.00025871498,0.00072924345,0.00045856903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902262,0.0064600133,0.00068842043,0.00033966027,0.0018846015,0.00040119418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028416975,0.00028600724,0.00042015966,0.0035506834,0.013201138,0.0072041824,0.0007784909,0.0011223722,0.005230397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010358586,0.00027166362,0.00011413142,0.005366438,0.008169877,0.0023105117,0.0034970883,0.0027812475,0.00031297933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025904697,0.00005398717,0.021421779,0.00029704158,0.000038283037,0.0015243167,0.84609646,0.00092244917,0.0033016568,0.08406841,0.004870627,0.03714596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016273447,0.00003107911,0.03351465,0.00021777824,0.000042374384,0.0001327917,0.89488614,0.0015862535,0.00097467354,0.0085217375,0.060021292,0.000055051518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75277275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83781546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24722725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034117684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017316096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49736643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612437179","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2017.1309904","title":"A Rhetorical Bestiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Bestiary; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07141585429859594,"score_gpt":0.2915769428938861,"score_spread":0.22016108859529016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612437179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005521197,0.02126073,0.014136764,0.15820342,0.0057262005,0.000031481653,0.00008519232,0.00019359426,0.79484135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6557811,0.011286155,0.010530323,0.055851147,0.009689805,0.00014357272,0.00012775126,0.0006816527,0.25590846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904022,0.005369137,0.00023101707,0.00090639055,0.002536948,0.0005541299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898808,0.005856627,0.0005878554,0.0013692393,0.0016764962,0.0006290231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076820627,0.0005910238,0.0005988996,0.0024484885,0.011746848,0.015220971,0.0011073775,0.004676908,0.014142517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016876152,0.00039149632,0.00045082736,0.001637861,0.030455556,0.016346497,0.005778019,0.008440389,0.004847698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009251097,0.0000066823677,0.000051388877,0.000041316587,0.000002457293,0.000037135153,0.004000898,0.000018424234,0.00009014326,0.9589472,0.029351832,0.0074433577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010173802,0.000018666855,0.00015716797,0.00031483202,0.000005905026,0.00016373835,0.0036341324,0.00013404895,0.00026455344,0.3057962,0.68948895,0.000011639719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014601948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024772203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015220971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058273696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046540713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047311425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612443877","doi":"10.21810/strm.v9i1.233","title":"Public Event: Stream Sessions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stream Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Session (web analytics); Miller; Ethnic group; Constructivism (international relations); Sociology; Politics; Media studies; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.10922439510198402,"score_gpt":0.3532349479651509,"score_spread":0.24401055286316692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612443877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044325707,0.00063311635,0.0051227733,0.012436201,0.03205129,0.005222185,0.025170743,0.011803646,0.90312755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009577912,0.00043099368,0.0031184524,0.0038976101,0.007980557,0.003859937,0.013151242,0.0035525477,0.9544308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825805,0.00038610437,0.000060329523,0.00026273364,0.00063222845,0.00040053696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364257,0.0006306246,0.0001589063,0.0005703688,0.001831575,0.0031658143],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003666068,0.0017597459,0.0011909538,0.0011518702,0.0049949703,0.0061276928,0.0022222628,0.0029699493,0.8221268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009126435,0.0007460745,0.0009012974,0.0013568992,0.00045367196,0.00332215,0.00658192,0.0043040016,0.6104178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023601756,0.00008523341,0.000051289284,0.000044192962,0.0000013531509,0.000018393086,0.00008245347,0.000013991441,0.00012762232,0.0004590952,0.98808974,0.010790648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007558141,0.00006940829,0.0006332601,0.000035352645,0.0000015667943,0.000016050248,0.00022715796,0.00010246792,0.00012437535,0.00064221804,0.9980641,0.00000856999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017909892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047170077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8221268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014993236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002472429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25371456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620063908","doi":"10.29173/cais675","title":"Trends, Icons, and Feelings: Notions of Affect within Canadian User-Generated Content","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Metadata; Feeling; The Internet; World Wide Web; Psychology; Humanities; Computer science; Social psychology; Art; Communication","score_opus":0.05559143465736109,"score_gpt":0.24306013733105272,"score_spread":0.18746870267369165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620063908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85762936,0.0009757122,0.0039901608,0.0018551231,0.00008092249,0.000113029484,0.0007203266,0.0001009905,0.1345344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994408,0.00038171856,0.0010260496,0.00008705283,0.000019682038,0.000041526007,0.00013611154,0.00002942765,0.0038704192],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673283,0.0009969166,0.00012238386,0.0002899226,0.0014525234,0.00040541904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310476,0.0036252418,0.00081393454,0.00026800478,0.0017298467,0.00045821167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035652944,0.00041083622,0.00024609765,0.008374226,0.006244436,0.008220746,0.000589543,0.0006582823,0.0035597426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014907988,0.00025425287,0.0002647889,0.007515687,0.006998272,0.0029590447,0.0023094015,0.0008099434,0.0002185338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015326492,0.000021232723,0.07335745,0.0002188124,0.00003187558,0.00033928276,0.8517352,0.00037518286,0.004442765,0.025356522,0.0022768192,0.041691564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009999847,0.000070083384,0.25101018,0.0002535598,0.000058114627,0.00032490707,0.6526009,0.0016814213,0.0017274414,0.0056071198,0.086501956,0.00015439674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56529063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5925755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43470937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018280579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008577088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8745389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621191120","doi":"10.22329/il.v37i2.4925","title":"Rethinking Rhetorical Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy: The Living Art of Michael C. Leff","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Rhetorical criticism; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10375970710132104,"score_gpt":0.320933486726976,"score_spread":0.21717377962565498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621191120","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006311467,0.84477115,0.0023954038,0.107652605,0.011697721,0.000014280779,0.000028776223,0.000038485254,0.03277042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022575695,0.85158,0.0026984662,0.03838247,0.026054673,0.000086554806,0.00007159732,0.00018067843,0.05836981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816304,0.0007557071,0.00005349082,0.0001230368,0.0008150389,0.00008962975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934233,0.0082797,0.000331769,0.00022643007,0.0015976815,0.0002220253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031011782,0.00058170926,0.0009992265,0.003571968,0.001684415,0.0063453247,0.0013120126,0.0027062537,0.006433803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373315,0.00035612565,0.00033817827,0.003902676,0.008026746,0.008562216,0.0019339914,0.0059150322,0.002668166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019073896,0.000025827094,0.00013278336,0.0018425231,0.000021466085,0.00011553021,0.0021075543,0.00036246347,0.00024557288,0.26031786,0.5788796,0.15592979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006051412,0.000009724109,0.00015589617,0.0020262212,0.000008495629,0.0001336557,0.0005947605,0.00010259287,0.00012202565,0.04007906,0.95674795,0.000013605306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063803624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006433803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004451667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00503765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03229922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621374998","doi":"","title":"Once upon a Time . . . the Power of Narrative","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2017 ASTC Annual Conference (October 21-24)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Power (physics); Psychology; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07663431506846878,"score_gpt":0.2959536980507799,"score_spread":0.21931938298231113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621374998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024935171,0.008599017,0.033646226,0.10771105,0.0043191253,0.00007015953,0.0002074716,0.0003521206,0.8201598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7317291,0.004833035,0.00938296,0.01260103,0.0014053148,0.00009975648,0.00016702371,0.0006311854,0.23915063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963148,0.002205649,0.00009380133,0.00039234597,0.0006704389,0.00032297007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940685,0.0026309711,0.00056737947,0.0009734788,0.0010622899,0.0006974598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041867048,0.0005023645,0.00045838763,0.0011615952,0.007499602,0.014026352,0.00095862197,0.0025450033,0.017311456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014326152,0.00036593695,0.00042769135,0.0009535685,0.016960844,0.01602504,0.0058976044,0.0047741914,0.0059982114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007598553,0.000018346738,0.00053812587,0.00019478267,0.000026692258,0.0002686102,0.083521225,0.00013791454,0.0012449106,0.8102903,0.067401424,0.036281712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013503175,0.000028880793,0.00031184775,0.0004307578,0.00001587386,0.00037641963,0.032885507,0.00019749602,0.0007108633,0.14590515,0.819097,0.000026689946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00262669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038343444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017311456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027400309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002927823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057912588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623091413","doi":"10.15210/interfaces.v17i1.10771","title":"Maps of Meaning: Interview with Dr. Jordan Peterson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interfaces Brasil/Canadá","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychology; Sociology; Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10028484359592682,"score_gpt":0.28592460663340613,"score_spread":0.1856397630374793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623091413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021379339,0.0065453826,0.0009885078,0.95176333,0.0021659643,0.00009502096,0.00012172679,0.00006252252,0.01687812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3128007,0.010274186,0.0030054306,0.6087754,0.0020028523,0.0007258556,0.00018869816,0.00030697606,0.06191989],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064904,0.0056598475,0.00024675514,0.00072513334,0.0016107499,0.0011085587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872794,0.0052909194,0.0007828496,0.00017643781,0.0026520945,0.003818293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011683045,0.0008132174,0.0012781529,0.0015835764,0.029683419,0.008239538,0.0024566678,0.01031595,0.005072906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02539425,0.0011959843,0.0005758162,0.002868709,0.015094864,0.011845309,0.007360629,0.03681258,0.0022233773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006154725,0.00013543166,0.0018758773,0.00016779045,0.000010571128,0.0026332987,0.40952307,0.00032189308,0.00061856915,0.01636454,0.5580264,0.010261061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126373925,0.00005281654,0.00078230014,0.000298102,0.000005555685,0.0017469133,0.4783191,0.00016195574,0.00019202332,0.0035236038,0.5148365,0.000068478344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04615195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047775973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04615195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014448884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016584823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10483444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625700597","doi":"","title":"Surveillance in Vancouver: Legacies of the Games","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.038304838735721713,"score_gpt":0.23045388656869484,"score_spread":0.19214904783297312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625700597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47693515,0.0023434537,0.0011802154,0.039476782,0.00041886483,0.000075373704,0.00032005287,0.000062374886,0.4791877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619435,0.0004778522,0.00026055603,0.0009988382,0.000028096905,0.000016944237,0.000070935814,0.000031769807,0.036171537],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758184,0.0009872132,0.00005602216,0.00017651799,0.0005246596,0.0006737052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99357516,0.0027683382,0.00032147556,0.00022422204,0.0017745264,0.0013363442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022457605,0.0003644568,0.00031402873,0.0019238072,0.020628737,0.013680809,0.0013441056,0.002635879,0.011267827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012966004,0.00032171677,0.00013723079,0.0030812568,0.0074444218,0.0019305641,0.0033244228,0.004181283,0.0007101213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003694645,0.00014000814,0.03347439,0.00033770554,0.00006547342,0.001863945,0.45909432,0.0011237971,0.0010287686,0.26357427,0.1284245,0.11050334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030762385,0.0000634081,0.033507757,0.00043699695,0.000042039213,0.00024442762,0.46642128,0.0013291163,0.0008268821,0.017490976,0.47952598,0.000080500155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90072423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9594043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09927577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030125601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025598655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21857756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W263411063","doi":"","title":"Mediator as Cook: Mediation Metaphors at the Movies, The","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Metaphor; Style (visual arts); Psychology; Mediator; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Transformative mediation; Vitality; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political science; Alternative dispute resolution; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.029102151836474396,"score_gpt":0.26384970451264356,"score_spread":0.23474755267616915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W263411063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1357313,0.013672719,0.09641751,0.04602313,0.0021935178,0.00033786625,0.00014117375,0.00025608623,0.70522666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96670604,0.001630803,0.008251,0.0018669595,0.00019091462,0.00015630487,0.00003085537,0.00008502607,0.021082116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950976,0.0041068387,0.000060460556,0.00022406972,0.00030103864,0.00020995812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970789,0.002049079,0.00023761639,0.00023767826,0.00018750256,0.00020929516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037733447,0.00069151516,0.00037217297,0.0013131727,0.007266578,0.0089961905,0.0015466507,0.0032310698,0.009106466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072083916,0.00036355542,0.000452771,0.00089706626,0.016623894,0.010005684,0.003588895,0.004234439,0.0007352848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031928146,0.000022597691,0.00034327433,0.00011047092,0.000009010232,0.0005202609,0.09231269,0.00008355746,0.0005892566,0.899523,0.0024846562,0.0039692195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107084146,0.00019286943,0.0014464994,0.0006871111,0.00006989249,0.002438854,0.20843384,0.0023862883,0.0021224096,0.2992598,0.48279047,0.00006501328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023637884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019076548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009106466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020442691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013086593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030464113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2669460978","doi":"10.33137/aestimatio.v5i0.25871","title":"A Response to McEwen on Hiscock, &lt;i&gt;The Symbol at Your Door&lt;/i&gt;","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aestimatio Sources and Studies in the History of Science","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Symbol (formal); Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.15502410815196244,"score_gpt":0.3115569650794437,"score_spread":0.15653285692748126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2669460978","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012409037,0.0014892663,0.00009615793,0.96369463,0.031989146,0.0000073588276,0.000033097378,0.000027548314,0.0025386324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018758111,0.0009605589,0.0002040019,0.9481183,0.015693702,0.000024751189,0.000019050964,0.00006604731,0.03303774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996212,0.0009404204,0.00024474307,0.0006726075,0.0014314681,0.0004986734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978914,0.010364042,0.0009700393,0.00068391976,0.0052582603,0.0038095522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005046458,0.0011608513,0.0012855558,0.0012262394,0.0114646405,0.00894644,0.0024473788,0.029466642,0.023164889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028465116,0.0008612802,0.000833569,0.0015274282,0.006370986,0.008997793,0.004910331,0.048167083,0.010809721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007868681,0.000004247187,0.000032539003,0.000023403392,0.00000156063,0.00003802845,0.00042753626,0.0000059891972,0.00005598981,0.0018635818,0.99621505,0.0013241784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069528032,0.000009641602,0.0003639968,0.00014305633,0.0000040030213,0.00008847341,0.0035056896,0.000027813041,0.00010643482,0.0017262415,0.99399287,0.000024751424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022237213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058861148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029466642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004841932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007563352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07749432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W271382778","doi":"","title":"Now I Know Only So Far: Essays in Ethnopoetics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of native studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.0885914359950102,"score_gpt":0.32101900081607937,"score_spread":0.2324275648210692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W271382778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02688231,0.18184745,0.0025052694,0.4841692,0.04518079,0.000049233236,0.00024002431,0.00010821323,0.25901744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5260331,0.10126881,0.00244161,0.10916674,0.04132908,0.00017061374,0.00021410087,0.00044889774,0.21892712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976464,0.0013994083,0.00006810042,0.00020302451,0.00038647067,0.00029650386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983752,0.011908088,0.00040219337,0.00047492483,0.0021317778,0.0013309723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034951747,0.00054713915,0.0007530596,0.002922234,0.01650867,0.010394645,0.0009661603,0.003637255,0.008946736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014669119,0.00026522955,0.00021870866,0.004688273,0.021127703,0.011392495,0.0037275387,0.0063320743,0.00091204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045432203,0.000051675925,0.00068311923,0.00046554705,0.000015620568,0.00023936786,0.22554582,0.00003151099,0.00025034344,0.2011599,0.5344877,0.037024047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009378922,0.0000085864895,0.0012161955,0.0009939071,0.000012719365,0.0001820408,0.15246837,0.00003730989,0.00020310984,0.020616118,0.8242312,0.000021086282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0811938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18803272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065034777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009112611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1614424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2720356034","doi":"10.7202/1072800ar","title":"Barking up the Wrong Tree: A Response to Dennis Cato's \"Talking to the Animals\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.09302302374289496,"score_gpt":0.2701452232317716,"score_spread":0.17712219948887664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2720356034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009392581,0.003102509,0.00023480241,0.97910017,0.012800183,0.000008889316,0.000017979737,0.00002119822,0.0037750008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01888783,0.0021886372,0.0003308895,0.9585278,0.0099838115,0.000051294883,0.000018430988,0.00015195592,0.009859313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831355,0.00955903,0.0006450028,0.0016835784,0.00309705,0.0018798123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627449,0.026219528,0.0019212121,0.0006585971,0.004725753,0.00372994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120446235,0.0017276191,0.001370758,0.0022184732,0.03595576,0.017069822,0.005266892,0.05232973,0.008196031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044048656,0.0012624598,0.0011456078,0.00262009,0.026141044,0.01598785,0.0098313,0.07929808,0.003367035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038016533,0.000031352083,0.00026447634,0.0001551701,0.000013246953,0.00068253075,0.08432215,0.000032631677,0.00024092561,0.029290237,0.8796652,0.0052640485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016766719,0.000021698885,0.00036756435,0.0006640837,0.000013236663,0.0006375245,0.09492917,0.00009842983,0.00025890005,0.0063414196,0.89659697,0.000054191085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036400005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05482029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05232973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013043981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01262694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09464115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W272099124","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4616","title":"Figuring Reconciliation: Dancing With the Enemy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Dance; Politics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Literature; Law; History; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08357554898578719,"score_gpt":0.29594466241741274,"score_spread":0.21236911343162557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W272099124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19464704,0.006145091,0.017211212,0.04056745,0.0015604335,0.00006010267,0.000035724726,0.00019909468,0.7395739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96032566,0.0010303343,0.0032886914,0.00108683,0.00019194836,0.000044792017,0.000025121877,0.00010568801,0.033900835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958294,0.0029894884,0.000056888013,0.00027666145,0.00051637006,0.0003311605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984615,0.00085839565,0.00015433501,0.00017644514,0.00014781344,0.0002014869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00322617,0.0005680892,0.00035166164,0.00120267,0.01527363,0.007729856,0.001154053,0.00235552,0.0059635495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064740414,0.00018347203,0.000265828,0.00075988343,0.016567389,0.0066247717,0.0059538847,0.0034987608,0.0008026926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006400713,0.000032064316,0.0011662157,0.00016713979,0.000014182148,0.0006787242,0.38294637,0.00019521845,0.0014325996,0.5558052,0.014708566,0.042789735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015608268,0.00007452704,0.0019647013,0.00058972073,0.000025616766,0.0006926828,0.28163278,0.00060926616,0.0020245675,0.07122824,0.6411119,0.000030395893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004719861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014868913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99528015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036710263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026231657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02663523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2725320123","doi":"10.1353/esc.2016.0019","title":"If What We Do Matters: Motives of Research in Canadian Literature Scholarship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Wonder; Skepticism; Insider; Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Canadian literature; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Law; Literature; Political science; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12318433410531944,"score_gpt":0.33995423579383477,"score_spread":0.21676990168851534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2725320123","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16383477,0.01683952,0.0022346347,0.6511956,0.0020038683,0.00019028461,0.00021232519,0.000105440704,0.16338363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454622,0.003949614,0.0014813483,0.027686872,0.000267799,0.00009614285,0.000064168315,0.00015834416,0.020833477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91530985,0.032296818,0.001770537,0.0041173506,0.02530338,0.021202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8829359,0.039941348,0.0049580713,0.0030687095,0.030088503,0.039007455],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06059244,0.0006546801,0.0013357436,0.008532241,0.114525974,0.047070924,0.004888193,0.012756082,0.0063516805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080118455,0.0012758152,0.0008692038,0.016806263,0.0831231,0.013487703,0.02109094,0.012858196,0.00080154947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006849242,0.000050231563,0.008376093,0.0002132964,0.000036930924,0.0007461384,0.4993506,0.00015407358,0.00038637873,0.41398346,0.057791814,0.018842475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024795583,0.000030260759,0.008617432,0.00067966274,0.00004339245,0.00018818575,0.6662936,0.00043621543,0.0002790927,0.042454798,0.28067902,0.0002735367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9648646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9784551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29776388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4109716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738551867","doi":"10.31542/r.gm:1009","title":"\"We story them\": Thomas King's rhetorical approach to the de-othering and re-storying of First Nations people","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Gender studies; Art; Aesthetics; History; Literature","score_opus":0.07922578031990753,"score_gpt":0.2652299220703433,"score_spread":0.18600414175043578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738551867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04379969,0.03507567,0.0053428537,0.3363351,0.0065178014,0.00007221239,0.00011121358,0.0001444878,0.5726009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8083828,0.0125718415,0.0020635738,0.030694071,0.001276036,0.000066327266,0.000054183136,0.0002481036,0.14464307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567515,0.0028769968,0.00005602333,0.00023998569,0.00069329276,0.00045851132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960989,0.0024708486,0.00020027306,0.000115679686,0.0005690544,0.0005452913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035156622,0.00063864456,0.00034630825,0.0014479541,0.02954719,0.011171402,0.0013681666,0.0030728488,0.0029199438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058388337,0.0002629278,0.00021678639,0.0013701356,0.035457365,0.008309725,0.0033245492,0.0075567365,0.00067425537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014258584,0.00001018131,0.00016867578,0.00007450323,0.000005182865,0.00028057117,0.56261873,0.000074104566,0.00011973068,0.34036112,0.08983627,0.006436653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054439734,0.0000082672705,0.00039582755,0.0003382078,0.000011320826,0.00035281343,0.29592744,0.00014592432,0.00034990857,0.029615583,0.67282385,0.00002539715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38649827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4652376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6135017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02380973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014599423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7684972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742237371","doi":"10.1215/17432197-4129161","title":"Innis’s Infrastructure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Politics an International Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dirt; Sociology; Presentation (obstetrics); Work (physics); Media studies; Epistemology; Geography; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09418999690177354,"score_gpt":0.36035386626543264,"score_spread":0.2661638693636591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742237371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034090264,0.0028937897,0.0033181512,0.034672428,0.0014555912,0.000026740012,0.00012863733,0.00013016969,0.9539654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27402887,0.0058396044,0.0045831124,0.00836322,0.0010450525,0.00016511536,0.0002571686,0.0003610267,0.70535684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611664,0.00085734244,0.00012271093,0.00072613254,0.0015429322,0.0006342244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975141,0.0006978186,0.00013354374,0.00044469474,0.0006791127,0.0005306988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028853128,0.00055593863,0.00035432115,0.0018074156,0.011280051,0.013095247,0.00161495,0.0029373625,0.025313204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066192984,0.0003597922,0.00025328866,0.0019162338,0.0116589265,0.008408937,0.0072387992,0.004183833,0.0066976333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000671541,0.0000040298437,0.000121542456,0.000017887041,0.0000010271256,0.00006669772,0.0033662564,0.000049672482,0.000055991357,0.94377595,0.041306734,0.011227481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015964952,0.0000031868587,0.00013141708,0.00007303852,0.0000011655227,0.000058866695,0.0015513976,0.00006578632,0.00013045894,0.050120976,0.94785726,0.00000486134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048838824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05093719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048838824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01630992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014675144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11833727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747197804","doi":"10.1017/9781316416013.009","title":"Two Politeness Parentheticals: <i>If I May Say So</i> and <i>For What It’s Worth</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07750486967384547,"score_gpt":0.2569093250665834,"score_spread":0.17940445539273797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747197804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004345864,0.0029127777,0.014815736,0.015776556,0.003419648,0.00004116767,0.0000671287,0.00014684477,0.9584744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28561836,0.002459629,0.008138972,0.006271375,0.002180672,0.00024913758,0.0002191192,0.0010179509,0.6938448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977513,0.0012747996,0.00007925113,0.00021289742,0.0004998056,0.0001820541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979907,0.0012621877,0.000093031456,0.00017340499,0.00033687014,0.00014374244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016247474,0.000896217,0.00042125114,0.0009531779,0.0032197088,0.0079107,0.00060461863,0.002911947,0.020878235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053307996,0.00042772456,0.0003691053,0.00075001264,0.010235411,0.007427465,0.0031329512,0.009308117,0.007726382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029492981,0.000018813093,0.00008395065,0.00011137108,0.0000026176685,0.000086690976,0.022498177,0.000032645225,0.00075624645,0.8826814,0.06292806,0.030770402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019970284,0.000030083886,0.00030207782,0.00043385566,0.000009133964,0.00045615569,0.009514102,0.00032354175,0.0010887587,0.14238803,0.8454054,0.000028867176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012897797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019622871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020878235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020031254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019318884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0698446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749541500","doi":"10.18172/jes.3058","title":"A fragment of the world, a piece of human consciousness: Tim Bowling’s \"The Bone Sharps\" (2007) and \"The Tinsmith\" (2012)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Consciousness; Poetry; Identity (music); Literature; Art; Art history; Psychoanalysis; History; Aesthetics; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.050054334102751015,"score_gpt":0.2989397140695947,"score_spread":0.24888537996684368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749541500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09683463,0.083634436,0.0054182573,0.43202284,0.02419964,0.00010781114,0.00034341932,0.0002030266,0.35723606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832091,0.017398475,0.0025562523,0.032601837,0.0036236756,0.000091861504,0.00011916343,0.00025079778,0.111266844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850345,0.0006171735,0.000025032381,0.00013729905,0.00047115938,0.000245999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843115,0.00064325676,0.000118702825,0.000092245944,0.00036455528,0.00035004984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020773683,0.0005283915,0.00029813804,0.001081403,0.015057798,0.009730336,0.0009629205,0.00213018,0.0023285034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037955174,0.00022169735,0.00026213433,0.000990658,0.03366787,0.005091604,0.0032275256,0.005026663,0.00039432614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007266195,0.000026009022,0.00035965984,0.0001974531,0.000012844898,0.0008111319,0.34450793,0.00008216483,0.0006307539,0.36519518,0.26762173,0.020482484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009486283,0.000021146046,0.00062117504,0.00036333146,0.000007902409,0.00041354384,0.16522646,0.000047842783,0.00045578973,0.01804135,0.8147598,0.00003219216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.228798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3456315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.228798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016064458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012689879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4549325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750817202","doi":"10.1007/s10912-017-9470-4","title":"Don’t be the “Fifth Guy”: Risk, Responsibility, and the Rhetoric of Handwashing Campaigns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Humanities","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Moral responsibility; Blame; Public relations; Public health; Individualism; Etiquette; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Nursing","score_opus":0.09169321795900051,"score_gpt":0.3136455461912108,"score_spread":0.2219523282322103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750817202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09661918,0.012039685,0.019909741,0.57439923,0.0028998367,0.000078734716,0.000032510983,0.00008301907,0.29393807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97147894,0.0011207792,0.0019327286,0.019442925,0.0007242839,0.00005626725,0.000007637993,0.000053938264,0.005182483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9663476,0.027260019,0.0007084929,0.00125456,0.0033490031,0.0010804072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8728099,0.11677272,0.004750084,0.0019104723,0.0024421648,0.0013146754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033356745,0.00084358355,0.00072655885,0.0021599978,0.012544436,0.01223697,0.0022123936,0.0147310775,0.0052262996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068138786,0.0008060387,0.00056284963,0.0009800321,0.051722687,0.014576085,0.006982497,0.018303797,0.0005775977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001108861,0.0000704546,0.0007863718,0.0002484561,0.000028423208,0.00023713954,0.11067681,0.00020282304,0.00040423172,0.8671191,0.009322126,0.010793178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016335235,0.00014596328,0.0016724202,0.0020845695,0.00012826933,0.0003868455,0.08705536,0.0016237223,0.0019105849,0.752703,0.15202591,0.00009999462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003403641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033230486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033356745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006087655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005169563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17640942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752647817","doi":"10.25071/1718-4657.36754","title":"Colorblindness in the Public Consciousness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections conference journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Privilege (computing); Narrative; Sociology; Racial formation theory; Racism; Gender studies; Perception; Ethnic group; Consciousness; Identity (music); Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Psychology; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12251030929508355,"score_gpt":0.2866375636050117,"score_spread":0.16412725430992814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752647817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38823655,0.009837543,0.014788831,0.06335982,0.00096114574,0.000036762664,0.000036100573,0.00012768466,0.52261555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963644,0.00032423914,0.00025285484,0.0006247513,0.00008693551,0.0000060526295,0.0000036599924,0.000013243327,0.0023238077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551046,0.0029332803,0.00007888228,0.00031118526,0.0006535291,0.00051261805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952728,0.0032158433,0.000533173,0.00028795213,0.00037668706,0.00031348047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005413877,0.00040412287,0.00025869414,0.0029602493,0.012482533,0.010201034,0.0006988968,0.002579007,0.0032330698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00884264,0.00027524238,0.00025790805,0.0010648973,0.046441566,0.009140797,0.007177147,0.00395999,0.00019067894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023325098,0.000016472064,0.00068509614,0.000041455653,0.0000035691753,0.00019473716,0.22597753,0.000085766886,0.00037289597,0.7641766,0.001423031,0.0069994526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001992972,0.00006607534,0.0021848932,0.0004798928,0.000020138355,0.00048151382,0.29938897,0.00045317764,0.0016568756,0.4409193,0.25428906,0.000040156374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005162135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026190968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012482533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007400078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003936574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053691566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760066721","doi":"10.5555/arwg.7.1-2.11rl3n1613k2211v","title":"The Gravity of Imperial Politics: Some Thoughts on Power and Representation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arab world geographer","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globality; Geopolitics; Politics; Power (physics); Representation (politics); Relation (database); Sociology; Globalization; Political economy; Imperial unit system; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.041293173194818664,"score_gpt":0.2627457682268064,"score_spread":0.22145259503198772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760066721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04475885,0.032375213,0.017407658,0.27927053,0.0016177051,0.000049684095,0.00005256983,0.000059229315,0.62440854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96533203,0.0074914093,0.0023933938,0.005384952,0.0025147689,0.000099187804,0.000026018746,0.000068225796,0.01669006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487805,0.0033768879,0.000104211205,0.00034407037,0.00065496704,0.0006416493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633527,0.0028698486,0.00022121679,0.00018974168,0.0002091989,0.00017468524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005234249,0.000597877,0.0006722926,0.0035499344,0.011359727,0.018416028,0.0018376417,0.0048938137,0.0045573097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006110597,0.0003989576,0.0006082394,0.0031404374,0.08315469,0.019669168,0.0059593683,0.0059496476,0.00056800665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027564438,0.0000023324599,0.00005196075,0.000010537135,8.4126214e-7,0.00003470561,0.013039066,0.00003123479,0.000013427501,0.98453856,0.0012853193,0.0009892806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010348715,0.000013180355,0.00032793873,0.00013077904,0.0000033918684,0.00012530887,0.028456068,0.00029463586,0.00009874667,0.87125033,0.09927782,0.00001138148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004817709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004133927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018416028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007197988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021559608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05222535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768641390","doi":"10.5130/csr.v23i2.5472","title":"Ghosting Politics: Speechwriters, Speechmakers and the (Re)crafting of Identity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Studies Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liminality; Politics; Identity (music); Identity politics; Media studies; Sociology; Relation (database); Proposition; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Epistemology; Art; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23034791168767724,"score_gpt":0.3956937323687896,"score_spread":0.16534582068111234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768641390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13846424,0.5024772,0.0026715212,0.051067278,0.002192729,0.00004707694,0.000036176334,0.000038270726,0.30300552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8395823,0.13351496,0.00088083383,0.0051892507,0.0010486068,0.000038285434,0.000023212588,0.000043874297,0.019678615],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895147,0.008191599,0.00029804703,0.00033648434,0.0012271218,0.00043196563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901218,0.007920267,0.0007924701,0.00033008112,0.00047164442,0.0003637162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066683944,0.00034739778,0.0006043602,0.0027098143,0.0058435695,0.012475622,0.0007821077,0.0025239608,0.003498807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010141329,0.000261084,0.00025727955,0.002726691,0.025111316,0.008145975,0.0044182963,0.00327374,0.0006300503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007330427,0.000054997734,0.0018540355,0.002104757,0.000023822775,0.0014812875,0.5373402,0.00005350472,0.0006420961,0.3125691,0.01054262,0.13326034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002284828,0.00007564554,0.003707212,0.0054949317,0.000036692683,0.0018759009,0.3289773,0.000048898175,0.0011500248,0.025670443,0.63291025,0.000029891396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044419076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006034297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012475622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034721373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004865974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03526622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785964361","doi":"","title":"Our Acoustically Canadian Values","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian acoustics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Acoustics; Physics","score_opus":0.08381194277061854,"score_gpt":0.28082141440529185,"score_spread":0.1970094716346733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785964361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009991977,0.0020105224,0.0012974918,0.056772675,0.0022205717,0.000018283054,0.0004017484,0.00006701869,0.9272196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59469295,0.0030522698,0.0023013565,0.020996757,0.0011877115,0.00005554588,0.0003486739,0.000233769,0.37713093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902165,0.0013963849,0.00014301128,0.0011991431,0.0047593773,0.002285512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301344,0.00081962824,0.00026593526,0.00040750075,0.0040097283,0.0014837276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031085147,0.00090034417,0.0004781279,0.0037432879,0.02963649,0.020423153,0.0015970652,0.0036125958,0.0348377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010273018,0.00037784677,0.00034965988,0.004486879,0.020076815,0.00396661,0.0042506857,0.009461488,0.004129765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042179105,0.000020054043,0.001210155,0.00006289327,0.000008332676,0.000095739124,0.01801562,0.00008930917,0.00059036206,0.83720464,0.114045635,0.028615093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060514094,0.000010059272,0.0037395158,0.00013808403,0.000014805334,0.00007655636,0.020390168,0.00009256652,0.00038593728,0.031195762,0.943892,0.00005852826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9124135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9498915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08758652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06016549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06758601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43653327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790031015","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2018v43n1a3354","title":"Communicating Power: Energy, Canada, and the Field(s) of Communication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Field (mathematics); Energy (signal processing); Telecommunications; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Physics; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.02076047285753335,"score_gpt":0.2333312780482085,"score_spread":0.21257080519067514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790031015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03577058,0.016206147,0.0029576244,0.20461152,0.0013775326,0.000034733166,0.00011823921,0.000037337384,0.73888636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502652,0.0074675237,0.00073110824,0.010137664,0.00039872204,0.000023248214,0.000026835274,0.000072782466,0.03087686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929194,0.0025031918,0.00015665463,0.0004131632,0.0021999418,0.0018077118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817778,0.010409242,0.0010689703,0.00043995856,0.0043274523,0.0019765217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065542725,0.00040313188,0.0005088615,0.0025639788,0.023107708,0.0237822,0.0012904918,0.005737475,0.01392455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022418438,0.0002936843,0.00029894782,0.0048957043,0.04055198,0.011111738,0.0060553234,0.0072476077,0.00069933356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039364873,0.000012823709,0.0013463633,0.000105019455,0.000010500719,0.00018773878,0.048555706,0.00012998324,0.00008983159,0.903415,0.024423778,0.021683939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033636832,0.000017644024,0.0043888697,0.0012780527,0.000046842273,0.00016108321,0.15951721,0.0003329361,0.00036259732,0.2785209,0.5552578,0.0000824628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85194755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88212097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14805245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051461652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1124061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37338215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790105511","doi":"10.3138/cart.53.1.2017-0026","title":"Coopting Cops with Maps: The Rhetorical Power of Cartography in Modern Policing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Credibility; Argument (complex analysis); Police department; Context (archaeology); Geospatial analysis; Power (physics); Crime analysis; Rhetoric; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Cartography; Law; History; Geography; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.023479990269076597,"score_gpt":0.2815078201635847,"score_spread":0.2580278298945081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790105511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11770661,0.029590474,0.09247821,0.2341173,0.0057175043,0.00010717932,0.00016080041,0.0006730749,0.5194488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96964955,0.004159126,0.007969902,0.0048905127,0.0014691657,0.00007257153,0.000041764717,0.00034110976,0.011406357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841616,0.01289832,0.00021264111,0.00052913476,0.0017676353,0.00043067217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9549014,0.040053897,0.0012503404,0.001846798,0.0014576184,0.00049000396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015656922,0.0010051635,0.0004723001,0.0065534245,0.011738237,0.013470221,0.0013702974,0.0037177096,0.004471542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03164657,0.00060471485,0.0003655954,0.005124242,0.04383022,0.021829758,0.009281622,0.0049701505,0.00074844685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050790284,0.000011832831,0.00046922543,0.0001698772,0.000011286982,0.0003569534,0.12946926,0.00030385747,0.00027539418,0.83042383,0.015958138,0.022499464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000484211,0.0000644386,0.00101681,0.0010095141,0.000024933748,0.0006664598,0.0810006,0.0031446347,0.0011092456,0.35516798,0.5566904,0.00005663576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047583105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003816435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015656922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004518192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002213595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08280271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791477852","doi":"10.1177/1177180118765474","title":"“We don’t kiss like that”: Inuit women respond to music video representations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Indigenous; Sociology; Gender studies; Popular culture; Silence; Entertainment; Representation (politics); Media studies; Aesthetics; Art; Visual arts; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.07224754931988381,"score_gpt":0.3286976563257387,"score_spread":0.2564501070058549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791477852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714335,0.00037993057,0.00042989332,0.005797027,0.00029253226,0.000066277215,0.00003823242,0.000024614441,0.021538056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895629,0.00043287128,0.0002648985,0.0019515578,0.00007236095,0.000058334277,0.000025136009,0.000024305058,0.007607597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981816,0.0010886473,0.00004471182,0.00010823238,0.00020456268,0.00037232056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980166,0.0010700509,0.0002827957,0.000070662456,0.0002426921,0.00031721007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020868964,0.0005539831,0.00034942094,0.00087011495,0.010819459,0.004195748,0.0009347862,0.0019266346,0.005905826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008829118,0.00034760154,0.00024947835,0.00056903646,0.004556752,0.002737611,0.004558454,0.0024625456,0.00057370495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002483459,0.000028430697,0.0026526724,0.00004911002,0.0000039433676,0.00071072206,0.9906053,0.0000065794197,0.000755409,0.00070373167,0.0009948019,0.003464544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020964992,0.000029212366,0.0013230359,0.00004648074,0.0000039504785,0.00019626484,0.9920604,0.000031084983,0.000115984585,0.000114139264,0.0060706646,0.0000066836114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029532893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045794055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029532893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020862273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015854215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05872196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791890086","doi":"10.1111/edth.12258","title":"Becoming <i>Teacher/Tree</i> and Bringing the Natural World to Students: An Educational Examination of the Influence of the Other‐than‐Human World and the Great Actor on Martin Buber's Concept of the <i>I/Thou</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Thou; Character (mathematics); Sociology; Natural (archaeology); Reflexive pronoun; Epistemology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.032229521246221644,"score_gpt":0.30821194141953245,"score_spread":0.2759824201733108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791890086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6226323,0.0032522653,0.0060867085,0.030119607,0.0003455718,0.00010755412,0.000024300542,0.00005766793,0.33737394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910116,0.00052100257,0.0006148069,0.00067376724,0.000029240986,0.000036216155,0.0000035031585,0.00001691238,0.007092913],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683374,0.0025084459,0.000030299992,0.00014469745,0.00021304857,0.00026971186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966737,0.0024663073,0.00030394926,0.0000696308,0.00010375335,0.00038266918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028608523,0.00033008348,0.00036862813,0.0006135371,0.007636253,0.005201257,0.0006907913,0.0013312991,0.0040508546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031510408,0.00018734066,0.00019903714,0.00044275413,0.019889185,0.003847698,0.0046602674,0.0035960518,0.00027708968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002795219,0.000107127795,0.0012018925,0.00013060379,0.0000033386552,0.00050176086,0.7322725,0.00008458502,0.00077847356,0.25219756,0.004808349,0.00788585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021904361,0.00015086634,0.004004482,0.0004866265,0.000014590227,0.00037469767,0.68634474,0.00033650425,0.0015517211,0.03066092,0.2760236,0.000029317764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00472103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010033482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007636253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003662993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025590602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026576996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793411805","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i1.4959","title":"Trump, Snakes and the Power of Fables","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Fable; Immigration; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Narrative; Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04332035917595582,"score_gpt":0.24120870936498154,"score_spread":0.19788835018902573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793411805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07785619,0.018930783,0.03166814,0.1323836,0.0017119796,0.00008993867,0.00005200765,0.00031864384,0.73698884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312737,0.0024451183,0.00568171,0.005419181,0.00044521206,0.00007145982,0.000019899071,0.00019533152,0.054448526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647313,0.0026935758,0.000044749646,0.00020243465,0.0003134918,0.00027255632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955836,0.0032058528,0.00037809872,0.00024253027,0.00037305104,0.00021686807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004235477,0.0006180692,0.0003658381,0.0023156395,0.011937644,0.008383231,0.00091099343,0.0027236652,0.0064659095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008869326,0.00035311107,0.00029133118,0.0010577126,0.032747515,0.01150924,0.00438876,0.0049552713,0.0009870623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016391914,0.0000065780373,0.00008580348,0.000034338693,0.00000179584,0.00011248041,0.04890106,0.00004105514,0.00011423374,0.93767136,0.008133882,0.004880976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033584438,0.000041889605,0.00029047302,0.00033674642,0.000010497069,0.00032602306,0.047234047,0.000496508,0.0007704109,0.39885482,0.5515799,0.000025088872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043309736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005882588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011937644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059145615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014794053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042913318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794150787","doi":"10.4018/ijsvr.2018010102","title":"La Terra dei Fuochi","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Politics; Publics; Political science; Power (physics); Mass media; Consumption (sociology); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03835956101909173,"score_gpt":0.3342907670564841,"score_spread":0.29593120603739237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794150787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033833917,0.022104569,0.003631842,0.017839214,0.0048915166,0.00015683162,0.0006104369,0.0007124614,0.9162193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54878306,0.010065144,0.0058635604,0.00523061,0.0048113735,0.00043313985,0.0007082365,0.00048318357,0.42362174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993042,0.0002156211,0.000017196344,0.00016516168,0.00014251126,0.0001553776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995747,0.00019014052,0.00004249784,0.0000639152,0.00007256763,0.00005609603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010741855,0.00088183885,0.00044440938,0.0016924774,0.003308584,0.0031227872,0.0005163035,0.001402974,0.022773128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020713797,0.0002711466,0.00040993327,0.0007698767,0.0024617268,0.0013042022,0.0019483995,0.0019091871,0.00499539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004483259,0.000109137756,0.008844605,0.0010819486,0.00004355262,0.002520899,0.03573882,0.00045226727,0.0037761303,0.40413883,0.2957526,0.24709292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015814465,0.00004700848,0.004966542,0.0003144861,0.000011253688,0.0006964605,0.0015061685,0.00012432126,0.00042150734,0.0041956822,0.9876872,0.000013560888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010064229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148522435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022773128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025723174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010997159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07618368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799230004","doi":"10.3138/topia.13.185","title":"Media Representations and Medical Discourses","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.09143795117684084,"score_gpt":0.3315642829374475,"score_spread":0.24012633176060666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799230004","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020237148,0.95834744,0.00026130548,0.019207276,0.0011092654,0.000004746405,0.0000458992,0.0000072091325,0.018993046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06215176,0.9233128,0.00045128513,0.0043288018,0.005142149,0.0000216684,0.000091232076,0.000026070837,0.0044742553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704665,0.0014978314,0.00023469338,0.00020898123,0.00081875664,0.00019299018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905132,0.00762824,0.00073622575,0.00018466698,0.0007399857,0.00019770183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035225262,0.00055585225,0.00056985166,0.010122248,0.0018962052,0.009574521,0.0006431218,0.0023813783,0.0060010976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127272,0.00033506093,0.00035442354,0.011913803,0.007746651,0.009698135,0.0029631092,0.002484118,0.0011845749],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092842965,0.00009264069,0.0017505324,0.0059075905,0.00006638751,0.00046862426,0.038944725,0.00025251467,0.00069458224,0.3518244,0.110536575,0.48936856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000141166975,0.00002995953,0.0044096955,0.012431702,0.00004138348,0.0009838666,0.011103156,0.000098052864,0.00036516314,0.039704856,0.930784,0.000034048426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035112565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003804899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99648875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003398406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002944555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02465725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800058815","doi":"","title":"Author Meets Critics: The Culture of Surveillance: Watching as a Way of Life by David LYON, Queen's University, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Art history; Operations research; Media studies; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.020760265688490535,"score_gpt":0.24735007973866657,"score_spread":0.22658981405017603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800058815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005123177,0.05170591,0.0005904228,0.81404567,0.010116372,0.000021887747,0.00012658484,0.000062551604,0.11820734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39049643,0.06686313,0.001081636,0.13187002,0.008469857,0.00010089491,0.00014467078,0.0008181741,0.40015522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941673,0.0025666512,0.00011101296,0.0005728309,0.0018112867,0.0007708304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819287,0.008263291,0.0006737185,0.00045043425,0.0054208217,0.0032629552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058561396,0.0007391844,0.001088849,0.0021706386,0.04208843,0.024516197,0.0016186136,0.008821897,0.008988402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014170087,0.00064150384,0.0002954885,0.0031058914,0.03134808,0.009619737,0.0045000114,0.0167282,0.0016356526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027572441,0.000016204458,0.0007762009,0.0001306708,0.000009179904,0.00011926543,0.09715192,0.000082610866,0.00012611088,0.1358443,0.7512014,0.014514513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006875768,0.0000060033717,0.0010579684,0.00047797486,0.000009194137,0.000071833376,0.083094165,0.000072281015,0.000112075155,0.0074365214,0.907622,0.000033135642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87853116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92942756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87853116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063402236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06698306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46001756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800660771","doi":"10.3138/cjfs.19.2.2","title":"“Until Justice is Done”: Authenticity and Memory in Paul Greengrass’s <i>Bloody Sunday</i> and <i>United 93</i>","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Film Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Art; Ethnology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04320057475785763,"score_gpt":0.27047226797727925,"score_spread":0.22727169321942162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800660771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65843105,0.0059938217,0.0020724675,0.036912594,0.00072356535,0.0000311966,0.00005596927,0.000027087588,0.29575226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835579,0.0008311386,0.00020025062,0.0011366141,0.00006257814,0.000011680843,0.0000125477045,0.000023863076,0.014163306],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891996,0.00060172926,0.000022684779,0.0001072798,0.00014916372,0.00019920587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834096,0.0007962249,0.0002931565,0.00012472658,0.00019009499,0.00025488684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014690638,0.00025913797,0.00023898038,0.00058156153,0.010694747,0.007613244,0.0007093668,0.0018300522,0.0047161486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047228946,0.0002354472,0.00013596864,0.0007094892,0.020692103,0.0050272853,0.005583511,0.0043457975,0.00031020775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029469342,0.000016702583,0.00080120383,0.000037861115,0.0000029310127,0.00032179817,0.91476417,0.000021684988,0.0003125211,0.07344536,0.0038236824,0.0064226124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011197974,0.00003535665,0.004841194,0.000244887,0.000009240607,0.00033174973,0.77359307,0.00007360979,0.00043762368,0.011896237,0.20849566,0.000030142086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048218362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09629614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048218362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004489644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023115515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09587544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801492516","doi":"","title":"A rhetorical analysis of wind concerns Ontario's use of melodrama to promote online opposition to industrial wind turbine developments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Lu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Opposition (politics); Turbine; Wind power; Engineering; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Literature; Aerospace engineering; Law; Politics; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.07866373189932517,"score_gpt":0.26299165063038793,"score_spread":0.18432791873106275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801492516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37784478,0.0017004866,0.002072003,0.02263453,0.00033058878,0.00014431297,0.0003530104,0.000049556333,0.5948707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629915,0.0007124607,0.00082361745,0.0017646425,0.00006996029,0.000055016088,0.00010713765,0.00005569009,0.033420064],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660385,0.0010478232,0.00005638382,0.00024950292,0.0015086008,0.00053376536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468416,0.0030887164,0.00050322036,0.00018688996,0.0010746819,0.00046232645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029878546,0.00033401896,0.00023808613,0.0024973287,0.017847452,0.007669797,0.00101194,0.0017904234,0.004931113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00575324,0.00024116128,0.0002107098,0.0030784851,0.013699146,0.0029990803,0.0028765434,0.0030655493,0.00040179864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012932999,0.00005623754,0.0072710356,0.00026015087,0.000011685089,0.0011811678,0.7861165,0.00011709157,0.0033019588,0.16414632,0.020209692,0.017198863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022088378,0.000034185257,0.020544061,0.00039445667,0.000022912187,0.00018218726,0.52747387,0.00055979454,0.0013387625,0.0061848485,0.44321042,0.000032447475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66117233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85686964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33882767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066205494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026473055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68164617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801628116","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n4p262","title":"Identity Formation and Discourse of Power: A Study of Us, Them and Othering in Nervous Conditions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Postmodernism; Metanarrative; Metafiction; Historiography; Literature; Identity (music); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Official history; Power (physics); Subaltern; Sociology; Narrative; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04093925694287748,"score_gpt":0.32188766846744854,"score_spread":0.28094841152457106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801628116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613926,0.0013695223,0.0010662103,0.0027926613,0.00007292408,0.00003500591,0.0000146570155,0.000008688385,0.033247795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966779,0.00038742108,0.00018309291,0.00020875457,0.000022429664,0.000017573993,0.0000059609115,0.000007459266,0.0024894818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498475,0.0037655416,0.000089463465,0.00030649494,0.000390621,0.0004631452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352056,0.005220408,0.00047523738,0.00018401051,0.00017698666,0.00042277662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004872624,0.00038743846,0.00061473646,0.0024233207,0.015038419,0.008949481,0.0011004013,0.0022719826,0.002373236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008007515,0.00031354022,0.00021732984,0.0022070117,0.026431886,0.009228154,0.0067960024,0.0033665984,0.00021480763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065175122,0.00001384059,0.00041393397,0.000016718519,6.6392454e-7,0.00021949511,0.98487157,0.0000063731927,0.00010264498,0.01264102,0.00016666218,0.001540681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002299233,0.000017889879,0.0010289862,0.000050290826,0.0000017929582,0.00020672122,0.98365,0.0000522544,0.00015830288,0.0025832502,0.012243449,0.0000046249443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055149435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008069809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015038419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003713175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024665536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02694112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802653829","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n5p35","title":"A Comparative Analysis of News Discourse","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Event (particle physics); Linguistics; China; Discourse analysis; Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06845408948708336,"score_gpt":0.3588831590227534,"score_spread":0.29042906953567005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802653829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7913457,0.0070939614,0.0016918391,0.001984496,0.00032160117,0.00014060987,0.0010018424,0.000037634734,0.19638236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99047905,0.0020384276,0.0007436963,0.00009991864,0.000106736166,0.00007549552,0.00060631003,0.00003239567,0.0058178515],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962603,0.00238889,0.00017737506,0.00029014217,0.0005880438,0.0002952612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98955613,0.00791147,0.0006489032,0.00032570297,0.0013094948,0.00024825815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033302042,0.00029028868,0.00033235198,0.009247134,0.004930706,0.005705196,0.0004956933,0.00081481604,0.0063325814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011372941,0.0001806372,0.00021794575,0.0111200055,0.0039330903,0.005021798,0.0021902055,0.0010758307,0.0004649504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025488317,0.00004777435,0.005357696,0.0005533015,0.00001910798,0.0010239579,0.92242616,0.000041641277,0.002261739,0.035305414,0.0024763057,0.030232046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020221793,0.000076480836,0.037964422,0.0005964604,0.000043605865,0.00043251814,0.81325835,0.0002523869,0.0019392716,0.003421453,0.14196903,0.000025726675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010298264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012821993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010298264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049007805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019448373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035557866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805366900","doi":"","title":"A Reconsideration of Surveillance in Michael Winter’s This All Happened : What Actually Happened?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Newfoundland and Labrador Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.0676819680932944,"score_gpt":0.28915530098574466,"score_spread":0.22147333289245025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805366900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0750892,0.003410194,0.0023163713,0.6901704,0.002838781,0.000026687241,0.00012762162,0.00005871358,0.225962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686474,0.0014061085,0.0011105967,0.065840036,0.00091595796,0.00003296566,0.0000724873,0.00018097568,0.061793536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99179596,0.0035645314,0.00022251779,0.0009446946,0.0009966893,0.0024756452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98408484,0.008805767,0.0013377866,0.00079330464,0.0030122856,0.0019659481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010936699,0.00042843565,0.00045674434,0.0015956439,0.028935838,0.017638348,0.002370626,0.011018979,0.008611541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022550369,0.000570917,0.00038192148,0.0016221019,0.033841446,0.013515202,0.0058027054,0.017760681,0.00076300284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043559343,0.000034945017,0.0032784631,0.00007165057,0.000017640146,0.0007447535,0.4007269,0.00010005143,0.00032357732,0.44958535,0.13101684,0.014056305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001292137,0.000017080592,0.005466486,0.0005618539,0.00002825117,0.00029836298,0.38894057,0.00023001358,0.00058864866,0.029170234,0.57460016,0.000085485764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66606194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.799307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66606194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039408967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027043482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6718094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810235564","doi":"10.3138/ctr.175.003","title":"“Nature Exposed to Our Line of Questioning”: <i>Tomorrow’s Child</i> as Quantum Theatre","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Postmodernism; Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031787776819183745,"score_gpt":0.2802294640873685,"score_spread":0.24844168726818475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810235564","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02715717,0.51418823,0.0025129819,0.122860804,0.008431996,0.000087966,0.00028488867,0.00011294207,0.32436308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50503546,0.38427773,0.003111747,0.03250806,0.0019218972,0.0001828258,0.00030247698,0.00030553303,0.07235422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964617,0.0017284821,0.00010065608,0.00027702856,0.0009933782,0.0004387775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966568,0.0016841678,0.0002267626,0.00015097178,0.0009623399,0.0003189456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004496068,0.00045018186,0.00053471193,0.0013924523,0.00678926,0.0062556462,0.0016428453,0.0025078477,0.008063795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084185805,0.00024741847,0.0002691787,0.0020671298,0.018448748,0.003803616,0.0028375674,0.0042171115,0.00088803883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010609184,0.000027715409,0.0004960425,0.0022193526,0.000018498766,0.0006430376,0.09165387,0.00010359875,0.00066780316,0.5954013,0.18322338,0.12543935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067096466,0.000014455828,0.00089934195,0.0013819932,0.000010569334,0.00023755127,0.018122112,0.00001841088,0.0002837913,0.003625017,0.9753793,0.000020744888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5030089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64006615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5030089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02886107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03255727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2819978049","doi":"10.1177/2043820618780583","title":"The uneven terrain of dialogical encounters and the spatial politics of listening","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Politics; Active listening; Sociology; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Communication","score_opus":0.026646300824603914,"score_gpt":0.2522822139732676,"score_spread":0.22563591314866369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2819978049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06945629,0.010623807,0.047479227,0.66499346,0.014432046,0.00011740914,0.00010576819,0.0001719594,0.19262002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94307715,0.0041068075,0.0066943313,0.023728106,0.0064703156,0.00022279573,0.00002909874,0.00029536788,0.01537603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623708,0.027593566,0.0011601007,0.002049971,0.004406371,0.0024191365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87719345,0.10809388,0.003328612,0.0045234854,0.0032903396,0.0035700817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041221246,0.00064425974,0.0011345666,0.0030256968,0.027845928,0.03542283,0.004469135,0.012027681,0.006954572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056975607,0.0004954337,0.0008770875,0.003129446,0.082807176,0.029322257,0.026729569,0.016149394,0.0009300059],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030221949,0.000015914477,0.00035627704,0.00019901038,0.0000076005254,0.00050847756,0.4501188,0.00016816054,0.00032062046,0.52673554,0.011757241,0.009782112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129765285,0.000034362165,0.00075775705,0.000660113,0.000015084249,0.00076000503,0.34690884,0.0004428185,0.0007299082,0.21554658,0.43405312,0.000078361096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036271096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006174505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041221246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005601201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005952838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21800137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2834827099","doi":"10.1177/2043820618780580","title":"Dialogue, discourse, disjunctures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Negotiation; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Colonialism; Critical geography; Media studies; Human geography; Gender studies; Political science; Cultural geography; Epistemology; Social science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.046248653382020756,"score_gpt":0.28772558012907484,"score_spread":0.2414769267470541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2834827099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044055298,0.06573041,0.022195885,0.34225014,0.015577749,0.00011722732,0.00015668762,0.00015289296,0.5097636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91973335,0.010687687,0.0039224625,0.025603566,0.009796664,0.00024373141,0.00008979539,0.00026818743,0.029654529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825386,0.013046078,0.00036345585,0.0014546541,0.0018496155,0.00074762985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98023295,0.016943213,0.0007095195,0.00058187696,0.0010641305,0.00046823194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007572191,0.0008406931,0.00079055235,0.002377644,0.014905867,0.013307123,0.0019546694,0.0056838077,0.004232104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020241382,0.00035120783,0.00038230102,0.0023768332,0.05748033,0.0125791365,0.0070046377,0.008422283,0.00085089763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002899641,0.0000079818265,0.000107728265,0.0002628252,0.0000081564895,0.00040157657,0.18597381,0.000092364025,0.0002382789,0.79008126,0.016480459,0.00631647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021217982,0.000024856396,0.00033990107,0.0007672774,0.000010887244,0.00041321703,0.12351073,0.00026522062,0.00030869615,0.2504669,0.62384427,0.000026808591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063508386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059418157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014905867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064042546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041915583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04646629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2853965943","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2018.14867abstract","title":"Rhetorical History and the Legitimation of New Industries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Legitimation; Temporality; Rhetoric; Cryptocurrency; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10161905388607116,"score_gpt":0.27024389428788237,"score_spread":0.1686248404018112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2853965943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15389757,0.008519833,0.045374557,0.059098996,0.0012760605,0.0000969614,0.00006579,0.00014459943,0.73152566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98582006,0.0008881378,0.0028746699,0.0015335359,0.00035416026,0.00004180694,0.000025634105,0.00008332884,0.008378769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345333,0.010279972,0.0004940901,0.0011722961,0.0036859945,0.0009143493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92043984,0.06492113,0.0046871854,0.004419305,0.0042233816,0.0013090173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021858241,0.00057967304,0.00063064543,0.006307687,0.010999374,0.01849442,0.0018602374,0.005848011,0.0060881083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057427634,0.00064543914,0.00041953832,0.0030138502,0.051554494,0.023992209,0.0072375075,0.006023556,0.0006973635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002263331,0.000016094222,0.00071582804,0.00009448128,0.000006100516,0.0002154139,0.038408607,0.00017450805,0.00033345763,0.9476194,0.0013074065,0.011086179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053350053,0.00007395459,0.0017360363,0.0012149123,0.000033175627,0.0004895809,0.037274573,0.0018113505,0.0018509589,0.76291114,0.19249012,0.000060917446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021178427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018834808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021858241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008074936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005022639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11559886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2872121524","doi":"10.1177/0090591718786471","title":"The Rhetoric of Self-Ownership","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Rhetoric; Depiction; Sociology; Politics; Rhetorical question; Subversion; Invocation; Law and economics; Ambiguity; Individualism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.056810154213223614,"score_gpt":0.2815420788844856,"score_spread":0.22473192467126202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2872121524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054079425,0.024389572,0.057258796,0.09210397,0.004083633,0.000046933576,0.000052429226,0.0002089274,0.76777625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698308,0.0035553353,0.0028076523,0.0038301528,0.0014864285,0.00004858149,0.000021020476,0.00011738062,0.018302502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991715,0.005858298,0.00018424733,0.00042602266,0.0013988029,0.00041767844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869942,0.010698262,0.0006512204,0.0005910578,0.0007946615,0.0002705918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00798245,0.0004695332,0.0004174234,0.0023213774,0.006471254,0.008219144,0.00094102585,0.0025536146,0.0037029034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015080077,0.00027605286,0.00029484803,0.0014941776,0.0369617,0.013655577,0.0049921228,0.0045692422,0.00069030694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070935953,0.0000028722227,0.00006456252,0.000040164585,0.0000015973251,0.00004384638,0.01523502,0.00004024184,0.00008708002,0.9784903,0.0021475162,0.0038396306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017242792,0.000039257568,0.0002117865,0.00060397526,0.000012882333,0.00030605393,0.013642917,0.00055096304,0.0010960207,0.63782626,0.3456751,0.000017613353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000836663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052904413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008219144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035663804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020578767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042215705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884142383","doi":"10.1115/1.2011-jan-5","title":"A Cable to Shrink the Earth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Telecommunications; Engineering; Government (linguistics); Submarine; Laying; History; Archaeology; Mechanical engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.07131720659331063,"score_gpt":0.20007458379622733,"score_spread":0.1287573772029167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884142383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034227394,0.015627224,0.008834006,0.051698834,0.0053161043,0.000028829763,0.00007768596,0.00022703587,0.88396287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5802977,0.014698783,0.004646385,0.013196855,0.0025738569,0.000057413177,0.00010545377,0.00045365334,0.3839698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916863,0.0003642497,0.000018423365,0.00008872154,0.00021627326,0.0001435958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992587,0.0003712873,0.00005410424,0.00008850036,0.00012110947,0.00010622849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008025086,0.0003447508,0.00015679417,0.0009738175,0.0052600936,0.0038861227,0.0003656231,0.0022064468,0.019164084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002628267,0.00013881193,0.00016070173,0.0008670334,0.007093039,0.008538689,0.0034374895,0.0026130625,0.004002684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000459205,0.0000131629695,0.00024674513,0.000093125636,0.0000035278836,0.00016728713,0.019097876,0.000118528544,0.00066530384,0.8865992,0.05568869,0.037260484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067697133,0.000027047288,0.00019199612,0.00012669117,0.0000030073386,0.00013966643,0.0069294465,0.000074859,0.0002286327,0.027395954,0.9648688,0.000007151054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025152687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037886037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019164084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021523118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012310375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06411028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887209635","doi":"10.31468/cjsdwr.515","title":"The Recontextualization of Altruistic Rhetoric in Managerial Discourse: The reductive and productive effects of a municipal management plan","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Plan (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Philosophy; Linguistics; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08240608805683637,"score_gpt":0.35462358178218895,"score_spread":0.2722174937253526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887209635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49341014,0.0014186642,0.02119265,0.06739362,0.00058604596,0.00010238027,0.00009537122,0.00017995443,0.41562107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947068,0.00008024625,0.0011082509,0.0003473687,0.000054031254,0.000028417238,0.000012420765,0.00006031095,0.003602202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.979928,0.01636829,0.00034005905,0.000791851,0.0016432839,0.0009285706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604356,0.029315446,0.0031645955,0.0034989016,0.0023343347,0.0012511815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018586611,0.00040198694,0.000423431,0.002515612,0.018122857,0.013219158,0.002116247,0.0038510677,0.004717321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045355678,0.00057800085,0.00035348037,0.0025972717,0.041759253,0.009759652,0.009746293,0.005820453,0.0003587291],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056416924,0.00002640204,0.0008781754,0.00009248497,0.0000082271135,0.00017504545,0.5444716,0.00014861881,0.00064099656,0.44441548,0.001996249,0.007090322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006651226,0.00010313779,0.0047410233,0.00046757044,0.000077847,0.00032642923,0.5009499,0.001945468,0.0026084508,0.26898095,0.21967445,0.000058279635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00772313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010567621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018586611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007056351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009139838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09829652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889723676","doi":"","title":"Talk, Body, Performance: Mental Health Rhetoric in Corporate, Government, and Institutional Settings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Mental health; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Business; Public administration; Psychiatry; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021663647032426094,"score_gpt":0.2074426625651583,"score_spread":0.1857790155327322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889723676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39483055,0.008762662,0.011594817,0.0605316,0.00086218043,0.000098352466,0.0000951441,0.00012630886,0.52309835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936287,0.0006098481,0.00058546953,0.0011923764,0.00008240581,0.000021765134,0.000013750631,0.00003083906,0.0038348641],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865991,0.009202373,0.00020738647,0.0005378724,0.0022674361,0.0011858612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822405,0.013713795,0.0013463811,0.00057488173,0.0010966605,0.0010278501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012290553,0.00065404206,0.00055977446,0.0043251133,0.02722833,0.021370731,0.0014057537,0.004130591,0.002898211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01831871,0.00044161396,0.00037643613,0.0033297387,0.07779114,0.010470914,0.008570186,0.006236573,0.00034593206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028377279,0.00002814165,0.0014519829,0.00010083181,0.0000065395393,0.00018646328,0.65739733,0.000090805384,0.00028002053,0.3309748,0.0021472306,0.007307514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027461041,0.000058929225,0.004691062,0.0007545128,0.000040980758,0.00025176667,0.7854583,0.00058418774,0.0009996537,0.067592226,0.13948432,0.000056573565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08877108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092211954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08877108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0255863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015375783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18564248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889846317","doi":"10.3968/10346","title":"Dominant Discourse and Counter Discourse: The Study of Dissident Voices in The March by E. L. Doctorow","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Power (physics); Event (particle physics); Representation (politics); Sociology; Literature; Critical discourse analysis; History; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Media studies; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.030956419744832105,"score_gpt":0.36464963379131843,"score_spread":0.33369321404648633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889846317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62699586,0.02080765,0.0037027835,0.18221343,0.0022452413,0.00010270356,0.0000724611,0.000059699196,0.16380031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974145,0.0027503758,0.0006957654,0.007135732,0.0004254715,0.00006747903,0.000013328593,0.00006625615,0.014700691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98988837,0.0076423287,0.00016939489,0.00052990124,0.001107689,0.000662292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97416466,0.022166304,0.0013969981,0.00043000927,0.0009662937,0.00087566004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008670168,0.00061471475,0.0006795472,0.0025559657,0.020543484,0.013644664,0.0019380251,0.004987887,0.002297139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02778216,0.00058600446,0.00027124278,0.0016762967,0.03299998,0.0128110545,0.008865785,0.008993185,0.0004368994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050027422,0.00004096294,0.00054469577,0.000074675474,0.000004818168,0.00073814346,0.9206509,0.00002528655,0.00028253652,0.06419336,0.006544131,0.006850464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023229435,0.00005060592,0.0013011702,0.0004306061,0.0000069868315,0.00079048274,0.8355324,0.00020048615,0.0005626635,0.01766364,0.14340769,0.000029984505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004779262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006354712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020543484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006229945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035534056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04585278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890377422","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Recognition: Freedom, Self-Definition, and Principles for Practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Politics; Normative; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0876536955381473,"score_gpt":0.24737547383641892,"score_spread":0.1597217782982716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890377422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059644222,0.0090539735,0.14124754,0.3077425,0.0018433097,0.00021607592,0.000038229704,0.00024036338,0.47997376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96897864,0.001230753,0.013404179,0.0066083884,0.00036401986,0.0002074077,0.000021363481,0.00010688568,0.009078419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9478847,0.03650306,0.0014306454,0.003718377,0.0072490904,0.0032141332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97308064,0.01729892,0.0013956393,0.00397024,0.0028846178,0.0013700502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051053807,0.0008066961,0.0010769193,0.0031057515,0.019017683,0.022524398,0.0031817849,0.00778395,0.0027328413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031561382,0.0006241588,0.00084222655,0.0021120692,0.23396134,0.028308924,0.01368131,0.014398703,0.00063884124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022483318,0.0000050803283,0.00007222811,0.000014164785,9.341209e-7,0.000018631372,0.016310638,0.0000649881,0.000025506828,0.9805007,0.0006748316,0.0023102206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001298217,0.000014583251,0.0001373568,0.00017595866,0.0000033401948,0.000058684243,0.016163291,0.00031488453,0.0001397973,0.91730726,0.06565526,0.000016578419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017270887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011802316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051053807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022436801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02526853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2700016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890924417","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5050","title":"On Appeals to Nature and their Use in the Public Controversy over Genetically Modified Organisms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Externalism; Natural (archaeology); Genetically modified organism; Sociology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.05638102254125447,"score_gpt":0.2573590903537078,"score_spread":0.20097806781245334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890924417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11512682,0.020706968,0.09151055,0.115508765,0.0021888048,0.00012916542,0.0001311143,0.00013544904,0.65456235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978508,0.0031814552,0.0047424235,0.00479841,0.0010504039,0.00012037114,0.00004669453,0.00012830194,0.00742401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.973704,0.01834426,0.00080337544,0.001594916,0.00431843,0.00123503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91713214,0.07289193,0.004239103,0.0020856257,0.002894707,0.000756512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023838434,0.00080466614,0.0009815234,0.0053943037,0.008893671,0.014457503,0.0019878745,0.012935624,0.006342401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05766062,0.0004908576,0.0009858537,0.0046113357,0.051606737,0.023360364,0.009018553,0.00909612,0.0007978908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019237315,0.000009316736,0.0002514414,0.00008488856,0.000009397019,0.00017279718,0.020890383,0.0000746718,0.00012214316,0.97434264,0.0010104058,0.0030126665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003045699,0.000026646407,0.00071332336,0.00065955677,0.00004209587,0.0003000352,0.016612872,0.0007038973,0.00034123438,0.9075176,0.07300872,0.000043608114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011737813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009138968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023838434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005378261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016304532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12607116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891342704","doi":"10.22329/il.v38i3.5325","title":"Where Do Sounds Fit Within Informal Logic?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sound (geography); Process (computing); Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Acoustics","score_opus":0.08279806609179577,"score_gpt":0.2761235432991167,"score_spread":0.19332547720732093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891342704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022852954,0.004642394,0.04004016,0.84191394,0.0060646245,0.00006339409,0.000119720215,0.00022446665,0.08407833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8834698,0.0045676692,0.008048488,0.08543876,0.0052243504,0.00017398947,0.000098722216,0.00032576328,0.012652421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850639,0.009916373,0.00069543923,0.0014403001,0.0017405973,0.0011433829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92710346,0.0574977,0.004437676,0.0025418964,0.0074138986,0.001005469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016416155,0.00061299204,0.00070314074,0.0021054207,0.006292901,0.015497303,0.0026387246,0.008710705,0.01171706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07614098,0.00040152238,0.0008520607,0.002418354,0.027349882,0.04056081,0.006971622,0.0111187,0.002588879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081095706,0.000034094715,0.0012926995,0.00027603857,0.000015360338,0.0006447712,0.09318543,0.00015407705,0.00028818616,0.8441954,0.03855556,0.021277258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027661259,0.000041756583,0.0015269007,0.0010158565,0.000018033355,0.00058608974,0.15098894,0.00074162276,0.00080714177,0.60823715,0.23593275,0.0000761233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039369348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004054153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016416155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00319894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026419456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08681792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891414723","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.51.3.0269","title":"Designing Soundscapes for Argumentation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Soundscape; Argumentative; Conviction; Context (archaeology); Normative; Epistemology; Sound (geography); Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History; Acoustics","score_opus":0.08313284929350859,"score_gpt":0.2801152351405932,"score_spread":0.19698238584708463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891414723","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17789102,0.001183169,0.5899575,0.006717456,0.00084345374,0.0015858965,0.00040030805,0.0059592477,0.21546201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78499955,0.000306349,0.19696221,0.0008167394,0.00013705224,0.0012664936,0.00022262435,0.0005160932,0.0147728985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103034,0.0065096505,0.0002903586,0.00051582156,0.0012262245,0.00042761106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96209353,0.028840307,0.0013191147,0.0032855303,0.0032305236,0.001230978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010424637,0.0011004275,0.00042850286,0.0022957767,0.0032653084,0.009210906,0.0019217316,0.0031238622,0.01852268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0329552,0.00049965695,0.0006455843,0.00084365666,0.007451666,0.0070390124,0.0065720305,0.0017515861,0.0025506685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076021993,0.00065959763,0.0049568946,0.0029359208,0.00012244195,0.0025030752,0.10817271,0.0127884215,0.054289673,0.49375826,0.022810657,0.2962421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031514652,0.0009933766,0.004249154,0.0021983052,0.0001345804,0.0011250336,0.053300533,0.03246053,0.028807923,0.2964169,0.57969993,0.0002985008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008793498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012028385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01852268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017519122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012676464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061964512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892001072","doi":"","title":"Enacting Compassion: Enactment and the Theory of Image Restoration in Monica Lewinsky's TED Talk, \"The Price of Shame\"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Compassion; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.028779558349916762,"score_gpt":0.21972030741669019,"score_spread":0.1909407490667734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892001072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19641669,0.011570527,0.06286854,0.20724854,0.002411155,0.00017287406,0.0000460315,0.00028463162,0.518981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97422665,0.00079448556,0.0032654805,0.005174342,0.00013853602,0.00006878047,0.000007687332,0.00007464212,0.016249292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556077,0.0035884436,0.000059275364,0.00021654606,0.00035785398,0.0002171698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425405,0.0041179173,0.0004989674,0.00038998658,0.00043106245,0.00030803413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005068345,0.00049375155,0.00028166405,0.0010265058,0.009303677,0.0069952314,0.001076289,0.0034183855,0.0014902906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00765587,0.00029691067,0.00035173807,0.00046151833,0.052714713,0.0072397967,0.005244918,0.0067454367,0.00030332457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018914863,0.00002941523,0.00035433256,0.000076090284,0.0000059431304,0.00026859966,0.26717657,0.00013164975,0.00038969613,0.7212079,0.0042822366,0.006058665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003703234,0.00009236114,0.0014555668,0.0006717452,0.000031541633,0.0011192856,0.22337979,0.0016215629,0.0027370455,0.41242462,0.35636315,0.0000662214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007180943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070268875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009303677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050731176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029220576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036808193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901202310","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.1475784","title":"War on video: Combat footage, vernacular video analysis and military culture from within","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Vernacular; Media studies; History; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.08122891318406045,"score_gpt":0.30693837904853255,"score_spread":0.2257094658644721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901202310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93235534,0.0012922976,0.0062744156,0.0039568604,0.00021799187,0.00006204371,0.00007771182,0.000036003923,0.05572739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486035,0.0005326454,0.0009639118,0.00044654368,0.00006431194,0.000034946563,0.00004262809,0.00004606453,0.003008567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952988,0.0036507982,0.00009458546,0.0002655013,0.0004189896,0.00027137555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939796,0.004672009,0.00051301677,0.00026872582,0.0003719577,0.00019473257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038593118,0.0004946414,0.0002891187,0.0017347736,0.0057444917,0.0067031966,0.0008088786,0.0011171524,0.0032260271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011765639,0.00024070828,0.00012886105,0.0015851143,0.010907955,0.005310956,0.00323923,0.0020774296,0.00033654715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016101343,0.000013741522,0.001258595,0.00006103736,0.0000027253127,0.00030230137,0.9838882,0.000017598551,0.0013812175,0.0064293016,0.00056088617,0.006068303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027185974,0.00003506177,0.0025383485,0.00016809473,0.0000051200104,0.00043743703,0.9630682,0.00010579815,0.0010210547,0.0015973072,0.031010348,0.000010555521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044969153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067955777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067031966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015510146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082312175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02041024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901372401","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2019.1525002","title":"Making room for auditory argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09086863553332207,"score_gpt":0.3361495280654507,"score_spread":0.2452808925321286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901372401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04242283,0.0035895626,0.14946832,0.03898506,0.007376106,0.00015781978,0.00012856552,0.0010807898,0.756791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585087,0.0023000694,0.053043857,0.003930713,0.0024042637,0.00024092857,0.00020289051,0.00069896167,0.078669645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913237,0.005421871,0.00024345552,0.0007720112,0.0016748203,0.0005641858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98257625,0.013322551,0.0008625705,0.0012944777,0.0011831435,0.00076106726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00754718,0.00081397645,0.00046092787,0.0017442269,0.0049733114,0.012548991,0.0016975454,0.0040201806,0.0318852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046355117,0.00036763915,0.0007167721,0.00081634714,0.009084265,0.014858363,0.010293026,0.004517075,0.008075823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020668175,0.00010131284,0.0009346276,0.0006089137,0.000027246877,0.00081221096,0.057973877,0.0006121028,0.0041736476,0.81667835,0.03196152,0.085909486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073701354,0.00009362612,0.0006205906,0.00096416596,0.000046968256,0.00052012556,0.03431066,0.0022751605,0.0030288426,0.47709885,0.48091212,0.000055108812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031291042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006039986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0318852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010877112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015011101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106666625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909477247","doi":"10.3138/utq.87.3.38","title":"<i>Detaining Time: Temporal Resistance in Literature from Shakespeare to McEwan</i> by Eric P. Levy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); History; Biology","score_opus":0.012715202580471183,"score_gpt":0.19626729302013404,"score_spread":0.18355209043966286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909477247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048727826,0.2507304,0.0014996406,0.61536896,0.013989117,0.000026569158,0.00011610111,0.000081575694,0.11331485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3379179,0.26788333,0.0026985707,0.12970202,0.027744398,0.00022100662,0.00035322295,0.0005360452,0.23294356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974825,0.0013506874,0.000102645805,0.00017839286,0.0006870135,0.00019879991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927648,0.0046060756,0.0005416771,0.00020460428,0.0013446298,0.00053829915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034307907,0.00070437073,0.00057188526,0.0026981721,0.012284825,0.010018,0.001296455,0.0033902843,0.006744712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008407081,0.00036839538,0.0003066951,0.0048545487,0.017199239,0.013551144,0.004343415,0.007099957,0.0019029431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002420563,0.00001176843,0.0003095642,0.00023315064,0.000007896845,0.0001609813,0.050627828,0.000049916598,0.00010594518,0.16559479,0.76616096,0.016713088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005611391,0.0000075531116,0.0011053599,0.0009444339,0.0000069940256,0.0001433149,0.028546868,0.00005761713,0.00014609862,0.02587711,0.94313717,0.000021887714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06855777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12755854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06855777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009348437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008359876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13631743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910170733","doi":"10.1089/env.2018.0019","title":"Toxic Bios: Toxic Autobiographies—A Public Environmental Humanities Project","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"BIOS; Resistance (ecology); Narrative; Environmental justice; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Political science; Media studies; Environmental ethics; Art; World Wide Web; Computer science; Ecology; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04025601017626758,"score_gpt":0.21946634354241243,"score_spread":0.17921033336614484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910170733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5274474,0.0033146425,0.008407375,0.11601822,0.0010730907,0.00058054127,0.00052181346,0.00033033703,0.34230655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93649656,0.0012512523,0.005176243,0.005644261,0.00020638212,0.0005624881,0.0001604414,0.00014950818,0.050352853],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935551,0.005038656,0.00005473061,0.00022647662,0.00070168555,0.00042330654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284244,0.0043572513,0.00044157915,0.0007236329,0.00045019962,0.0011849422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072408766,0.00040185457,0.00021563955,0.0011553691,0.018577673,0.0049087238,0.0012184381,0.0022620664,0.009344569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009943805,0.0002284546,0.00017205876,0.0015590354,0.016471675,0.004088503,0.009898745,0.0037862074,0.00055792666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019396172,0.00044414608,0.0022826015,0.000368131,0.000012415953,0.0013494727,0.50096893,0.00032499843,0.0018658366,0.34104735,0.08122258,0.069919534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038989987,0.00014000587,0.0026576566,0.00020345027,0.0000094623765,0.00052144175,0.30540472,0.00029304385,0.0019493907,0.02221364,0.6665407,0.000027526596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014741678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029393373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018577673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059280256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069310525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04301101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912988450","doi":"10.1386/post.5.1.29_1","title":"The mediated arena: Re-image-ining the epideictic in the digital age","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Poster","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Media studies; Musical; Rhetoric; Politics; Explication; Entertainment; Aesthetics; Law; Visual arts; Art; Literature; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09976575476305209,"score_gpt":0.29504228759095097,"score_spread":0.19527653282789886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912988450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10855994,0.009081726,0.014020677,0.0766145,0.0022302745,0.000047740134,0.000051441293,0.00015790456,0.78923583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95647377,0.0021370007,0.0012334877,0.0035101566,0.0007036474,0.00004258541,0.000019750074,0.000101405785,0.03577834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954939,0.0030905202,0.00008529929,0.00033339855,0.00061743235,0.00037943854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565625,0.0026371132,0.000313351,0.0005454281,0.0003199881,0.0005278697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004733686,0.0004751271,0.00026877865,0.0022365756,0.009770963,0.01686405,0.0013450942,0.0029474292,0.0074549885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007386371,0.00021046384,0.00028922677,0.0009479722,0.044783432,0.014619943,0.017136548,0.0054328507,0.0013253702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021304688,0.000025843905,0.00046791526,0.00006470747,0.0000028717966,0.0005068849,0.17169452,0.000056312943,0.0002995796,0.8039026,0.008950468,0.014007004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013660155,0.00004455501,0.00058722135,0.00040941074,0.000007794582,0.00075916137,0.119070694,0.00023951913,0.0008779882,0.086456686,0.79150856,0.000024665385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020959836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032767304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01686405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052118124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022049241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037814558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916655648","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.913","title":"Brian Massumi and Communication Studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Politics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.18814780274258888,"score_gpt":0.39549709129011074,"score_spread":0.20734928854752185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916655648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003234637,0.13451825,0.0019746784,0.52644837,0.00562563,0.000016409593,0.00008787792,0.000071499315,0.3280227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5839675,0.10353366,0.0024884928,0.07627411,0.021001877,0.00032427246,0.00014244583,0.00021335394,0.21205422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581146,0.0025439423,0.000087451815,0.00044182412,0.00085238577,0.0002630081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934638,0.0045939744,0.0003501442,0.00030747332,0.0008313672,0.00045311096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025554309,0.0008501302,0.0005922003,0.0025628058,0.008136242,0.006473881,0.0013018821,0.005784172,0.023630798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00887169,0.00027597893,0.0002814882,0.003234421,0.015560732,0.0096605355,0.003348537,0.0060348976,0.003607464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010222637,0.000013181811,0.00008947668,0.00009836749,0.0000028066954,0.00008021793,0.0047592027,0.000067975816,0.0000620966,0.8170982,0.16678166,0.010936546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071026975,0.00000894264,0.00022679752,0.0005301997,0.0000024377903,0.00012342322,0.0024928479,0.00012689883,0.000074713396,0.16046636,0.8359282,0.000012149481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011787175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050438726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023630798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010750375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035927028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079052866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917534599","doi":"10.13008/2151-2957.1282","title":"Scientific Futures for a Rhetoric of Science: \"We do this and they do that?\" A Junior-Senior Scholar Session, RSA 2018, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 1 June 2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poroi","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Performative utterance; Sociology; Materiality (auditing); Science studies; Futures contract; Epistemology; Social science; Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Linguistics; Art","score_opus":0.04253928812415427,"score_gpt":0.27997747549008317,"score_spread":0.2374381873659289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917534599","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009560968,0.0139175225,0.005316306,0.79496723,0.044301644,0.000113378344,0.00014171077,0.0002126144,0.13146856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38875386,0.014209283,0.010570034,0.15576376,0.040721126,0.00046122793,0.00036039948,0.0011982518,0.38796198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559,0.0025817023,0.00011713386,0.00040721058,0.00092761,0.0003764102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912177,0.005129825,0.00037992682,0.00040237277,0.0011725225,0.0016977036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010821913,0.000788996,0.0005800649,0.001236726,0.0138182845,0.013547798,0.0010325467,0.005664379,0.018764297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013696286,0.00035722987,0.00073447067,0.00092209893,0.011786887,0.010201011,0.0073677506,0.013749458,0.00490122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048510046,0.000056682522,0.00031073458,0.00014105998,0.000007080388,0.00015292331,0.045683894,0.00005180925,0.00055361947,0.19992554,0.7301443,0.02292378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010841871,0.000028222263,0.00030778663,0.00025143343,0.0000043443506,0.000086909226,0.013726333,0.00007764636,0.00022305336,0.016921448,0.9683497,0.000012330381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027182589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006056534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98618174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062912256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005275728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06277281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918131609","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2019v44n1a3381","title":"Translating the Public Imaginary: The Narrative Aesthetics of Public Engagement in Canadian Broadcasting Policy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Narrative; Commission; Public discourse; Sociology; Political science; Discourse analysis; The Imaginary; Public policy; Broadcasting (networking); Media studies; Aesthetics; Public relations; Psychology; Art; Law; Linguistics; Literature; Politics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.08476660601390218,"score_gpt":0.27883849072618483,"score_spread":0.19407188471228265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918131609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32660463,0.003019495,0.012702904,0.03959306,0.0005376962,0.00014328866,0.00016263202,0.0001601001,0.6170762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921427,0.00035154703,0.0010058179,0.00043679966,0.000033297452,0.000032088185,0.000024377532,0.00005721003,0.0059160655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98517925,0.008532074,0.0002286825,0.00075621816,0.003358911,0.0019449529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882345,0.0070170066,0.00084084953,0.0008924765,0.0020919533,0.00092302763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01252053,0.0009159654,0.0005234056,0.005253668,0.036136214,0.02852973,0.0024430288,0.0030628298,0.0055573066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021785047,0.0004859871,0.00048132526,0.005181856,0.07684486,0.007283907,0.010850582,0.005051668,0.00033395368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024344175,0.000009250939,0.0009806026,0.00007489814,0.0000048081065,0.0003214208,0.7365207,0.0001854868,0.00030260705,0.25117975,0.0027796195,0.0076164845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011908965,0.000012215119,0.0024184855,0.00030750714,0.000021136671,0.0002169752,0.787959,0.00065481855,0.00050333585,0.04273789,0.16511126,0.000045526816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6843461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6779038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31565392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07570441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05833877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63502574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919469697","doi":"10.5539/ass.v15n3p40","title":"Inter-caste Marriage and the Impact on the Intra-cultural Communication Pattern of Balinese Hindu in Indonesia: An Ethnography Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Hinduism; Ethnography; Indigenous; Sociology; Gender studies; Identity (music); Sibling; Colonialism; Arranged Marriage; Power (physics); Anthropology; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Religious studies; Ecology; Art","score_opus":0.04510841369855967,"score_gpt":0.3215904279245529,"score_spread":0.2764820142259932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919469697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982064,0.0001260231,0.0000715116,0.00006317873,0.000003523951,0.00000976955,0.000012997198,8.6301407e-7,0.0015057825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980552,0.0004104636,0.00015449394,0.00006026598,0.000008353225,0.00001888704,0.000021550391,0.000003411745,0.0012674043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992663,0.0004726999,0.000029830682,0.00006513943,0.000051649968,0.00011433405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932516,0.0004044243,0.00009718062,0.0000348591,0.000041258612,0.00009711669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089351245,0.00028352387,0.0002799493,0.0009124055,0.003631134,0.0015682806,0.00048203004,0.00043753185,0.0015302394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011394558,0.00027302967,0.00013117243,0.00093842536,0.0022626324,0.0012254704,0.0014075561,0.00073926535,0.00021383127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018143832,0.00006273801,0.019492358,0.000047857826,0.0000034390002,0.0016576046,0.9727347,0.000010644991,0.0012975007,0.00028368144,0.00012244782,0.0042690095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014576349,0.000078890174,0.0520308,0.000046061497,0.00000773473,0.00091504777,0.9438931,0.00005005167,0.00032941392,0.000058595568,0.002579734,0.0000091995435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00911098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0297984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00911098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095803756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007409528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018115938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919886622","doi":"","title":"Sounding out on reconciliation: community radio and discourses of redress in Winnipeg, Manitoba","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Depth sounding; Community radio; Political science; Public administration; Geography; Sociology; Media studies; Cartography; Law","score_opus":0.09547953486909158,"score_gpt":0.3089479127165722,"score_spread":0.2134683778474806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919886622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.770819,0.004030001,0.0015151511,0.06456456,0.0005172884,0.00016251022,0.00016907351,0.00005276256,0.15816966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818064,0.0007424914,0.00047314982,0.0016431203,0.000028713495,0.000039787596,0.000027078733,0.000083788735,0.015155471],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539715,0.002755904,0.00007161115,0.00027730933,0.00047902603,0.0010190769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251586,0.004385562,0.00044588966,0.00021242615,0.0012871544,0.0011530827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007208597,0.0004196429,0.00049627735,0.0023623516,0.033832546,0.009962699,0.0025842143,0.0028599983,0.006834673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015197773,0.0005181953,0.00015657977,0.004088124,0.019022014,0.0028333662,0.007220028,0.004406842,0.00038147753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046549456,0.000012484498,0.0018178242,0.000082689025,0.0000068021604,0.0005502743,0.95510024,0.000062776024,0.00043139883,0.028830333,0.0058624125,0.007196161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010082867,0.000010261301,0.004624328,0.00019318107,0.000013051137,0.000081195365,0.89714104,0.00007021983,0.00023907083,0.0013648145,0.09623893,0.000013754689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86806154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9430706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13193846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03703878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04995495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26873642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922018101","doi":"10.22329/il.v39i1.5340","title":"Rhetoric and Logical Reasoning as Engagement with Being","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Conviction; Argument (complex analysis); Existentialism; Confusion; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Logical form; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03817517719170175,"score_gpt":0.2441166542721782,"score_spread":0.20594147708047647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922018101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05963887,0.0076812413,0.30285922,0.048468236,0.0009910637,0.00024345382,0.000087061395,0.000293593,0.5797373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588676,0.0014246599,0.027128568,0.0018754725,0.00036618224,0.0001707419,0.00005614304,0.00012275146,0.009987793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725389,0.021279698,0.00082144665,0.0015352624,0.002653942,0.0011706838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97646934,0.018695185,0.0017667977,0.0013618554,0.0010499555,0.0006568113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018440407,0.0008124274,0.0007629883,0.0039125877,0.007302737,0.01434464,0.001955183,0.005301201,0.0048440876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018307142,0.00054075534,0.0011521769,0.0024734195,0.07673735,0.020638634,0.008497597,0.0060257516,0.0010116975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005837424,0.000004528458,0.000058241927,0.00003687262,0.0000031011994,0.000048260677,0.013325952,0.00013755074,0.00011343148,0.9846044,0.0002345666,0.0014272573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015589549,0.000019783603,0.00010645449,0.00012661958,0.000008125983,0.000108149885,0.0063086255,0.0005340944,0.00025272754,0.9620685,0.030436479,0.000014840356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015374676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085097755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018440407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005096843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035928155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09752339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922287495","doi":"10.33137/incite.1.28910","title":"\"Heartless, Robotic Apologies\": Indigenizing Toronto Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"in cite journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Sociology; Conjunction (astronomy); Reading (process); Media studies; Anthem; Pedagogy; Visual arts; Political science; Law; Art; Computer science; Art history; Computer security","score_opus":0.06611485321771107,"score_gpt":0.31220181160038246,"score_spread":0.2460869583826714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922287495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18468595,0.0021929967,0.006278675,0.046548817,0.0010651466,0.000059400834,0.000053846943,0.00023349059,0.7588816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93550545,0.0005755289,0.0008399618,0.0013050322,0.00008881545,0.00001728449,0.00002035137,0.00008317208,0.061564494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955147,0.0021645147,0.00008427754,0.00037781952,0.0010476538,0.00081102457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994703,0.0025402796,0.0005761405,0.0005587315,0.00061085366,0.0010109608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033290535,0.00046149277,0.00023490323,0.0012968471,0.023982514,0.009956577,0.0014230175,0.0024927764,0.012298614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012226892,0.00030524822,0.00017100367,0.0010643374,0.03382698,0.0055690715,0.01015555,0.004882481,0.0011064358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023660752,0.000022674196,0.0014752074,0.00007387766,0.0000041267426,0.00040836367,0.6409342,0.0001081841,0.0003938006,0.3068871,0.024316935,0.025351854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010578563,0.000034707347,0.0022859026,0.000282534,0.000013834413,0.00020788512,0.33948037,0.00037144969,0.0006656036,0.024746979,0.6318717,0.000028413104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2327502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48216638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7672498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028178986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016711557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4627909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2928450664","doi":"","title":"O CANADA, WHOSE HOME AND NATIVE LAND? AN AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL NARRATIVE INQUIRY INTO THE CRITICAL ROLE OF CURRICULUM IN IDENTITY AFFIRMATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Identity (music); Curriculum; Pedagogy; Narrative inquiry; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.019313680389449427,"score_gpt":0.29849834251994173,"score_spread":0.2791846621304923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2928450664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29561934,0.002317195,0.0016974832,0.091687396,0.0006550863,0.00006560569,0.00025058567,0.00003713713,0.60767025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9332797,0.001052259,0.0004496299,0.004724852,0.000043526874,0.000013871141,0.000038210503,0.000045538665,0.060352497],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857473,0.00041003563,0.000017021652,0.00015128827,0.000253067,0.0005938271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978732,0.0007398602,0.00014673141,0.00007122708,0.0005284777,0.0006404761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001645011,0.00023307763,0.0002340086,0.00069962745,0.022330396,0.0084488625,0.0009896768,0.0021322079,0.00746937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006114288,0.00013205508,0.0001403014,0.0015047194,0.021918155,0.0048414217,0.0034310597,0.0037589085,0.00038544487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051778778,0.000035595483,0.004894478,0.00008075734,0.0000048762813,0.00067495333,0.6627669,0.0000934576,0.00044128508,0.28132877,0.03139913,0.018228082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064400883,0.000008556461,0.003271539,0.00014758705,0.000008145305,0.0000952791,0.7812246,0.00008953033,0.00025419416,0.00872854,0.20614712,0.000018423794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95375663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9798131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04624337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03269927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07835616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23725092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938830920","doi":"10.1111/aman.13241","title":"Uncertain Risks: Salmon Science, Harm, and Ignorance in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Anthropologist","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Iowa State University","keywords":"Ignorance; Harm; Commission; Politics; Public opinion; Political science; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Foundation (evidence); Scientific consensus; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Ecology; Climate change","score_opus":0.051517045764924316,"score_gpt":0.31286810152190664,"score_spread":0.2613510557569823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938830920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36219597,0.013415618,0.0037571944,0.2199058,0.00071175746,0.00010860837,0.00033058645,0.000045631932,0.39952892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98378974,0.002418033,0.00040980853,0.0062483847,0.000085640466,0.000013055566,0.00002424904,0.000010525768,0.007000582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99129933,0.0020431734,0.00027885448,0.00068766566,0.0041377265,0.0015532769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96871275,0.021119336,0.0020308262,0.00046040135,0.0066341343,0.0010425234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010431605,0.00038448884,0.00051574426,0.0031334192,0.030894922,0.013250225,0.0017139047,0.0055197524,0.00530353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031588953,0.00038963932,0.00027979986,0.0039915503,0.026291521,0.003709291,0.006188683,0.008507087,0.00019335472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096406475,0.000048343718,0.013288859,0.0004381603,0.000058138074,0.0032540062,0.48290464,0.0014387296,0.0008123006,0.42171878,0.040366568,0.03557509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026740423,0.00004258791,0.017908141,0.0014048872,0.000102352955,0.00048971124,0.47719002,0.002008471,0.0013652255,0.06791889,0.43130478,0.00023824563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96910506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109955624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11790642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7977876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941317976","doi":"10.5430/elr.v8n2p1","title":"From Discussion to Fist-fighting: Was Strategic Maneuvering Derailed during the Debate on the Presidential Age Limit Bill in Uganda?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Linguistics Research","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Parliament; Fist; Politics; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Dialectic; Law; Argumentation theory; Object (grammar); Political science; Political economy; Media studies; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12358706973989832,"score_gpt":0.330758932997488,"score_spread":0.20717186325758968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941317976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8764576,0.0106614055,0.0028278122,0.029918408,0.000943651,0.00010341404,0.000053636984,0.000027259157,0.079006754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366534,0.0012864888,0.0003497221,0.0009113781,0.00012442522,0.000032409447,0.000011029789,0.000024434788,0.003594944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98218346,0.014896673,0.00033970986,0.00061253796,0.0009902619,0.0009773613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97979635,0.015940804,0.0023178617,0.00036396692,0.00092768687,0.0006532763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015104942,0.00038403206,0.0005888321,0.0021237421,0.018158648,0.013080402,0.0010339554,0.0034539583,0.0020715462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029894877,0.00062972767,0.0002995509,0.002368357,0.019868644,0.0093354015,0.0053863963,0.0054869507,0.00047252802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007866277,0.000016359332,0.0016500861,0.0002222961,0.000007844189,0.0012165863,0.955352,0.000026826729,0.0006744435,0.0327527,0.001337979,0.0066641252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011179975,0.000077970355,0.006512783,0.00074332254,0.000021421696,0.0006176513,0.8860946,0.00013157657,0.0014692207,0.0060220845,0.09826401,0.00003410027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041724527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058205253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018158648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006760104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003365317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079883456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943039435","doi":"10.3138/jcs.2017-0060","title":"Commemoration, Veneration, and Inspiration: Constituting the Terry Fox Public","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Veneration; Sociology; Sensibility; Memorialization; Aesthetics; Media studies; Environmental ethics; History; Law; Art; Political science; Archaeology; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15831576900326025,"score_gpt":0.26365017943576613,"score_spread":0.10533441043250588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943039435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44969237,0.004874056,0.0046971026,0.022119211,0.0008671816,0.00003546753,0.00007903855,0.00021310715,0.5174225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97364795,0.00046186446,0.00047841537,0.0005245285,0.000062112675,0.000005751064,0.000014013769,0.00007121715,0.024734095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978479,0.0007380821,0.000027076538,0.00017883678,0.00065393944,0.0005541809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975387,0.0010403569,0.00021864136,0.0002062366,0.0005019609,0.00049408845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002715338,0.0004432677,0.00034943328,0.001438501,0.026007023,0.010950742,0.0012489116,0.0021392095,0.0047514057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047379225,0.0002558732,0.00022980123,0.0013828527,0.037824515,0.0035954386,0.0055165263,0.0033308733,0.0004264082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003934285,0.000018789384,0.00224986,0.000073887684,0.00000914375,0.0009791614,0.7439991,0.00009757268,0.00075823104,0.22530949,0.009213615,0.017251715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007855567,0.000044878772,0.0037392383,0.00032208543,0.000035302797,0.00054973125,0.56735075,0.00024926604,0.0013436696,0.0121768955,0.41412798,0.000052318355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54834795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7152484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45165205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027159795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02598774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9086238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943941955","doi":"10.15353/cjo.71.657","title":"President’s Travels | Les déplacements du président","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.031073046875865172,"score_gpt":0.30480173285589496,"score_spread":0.2737286859800298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943941955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03178921,0.047397356,0.0014334687,0.38246828,0.02730467,0.000021116468,0.00036272843,0.00018645004,0.50903684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7759964,0.015876545,0.0007640992,0.029247947,0.00867412,0.000026158832,0.00012750554,0.00028036043,0.16900696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632215,0.0018267803,0.00011109402,0.0002299622,0.0010105058,0.00049960596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99279505,0.0039139916,0.00066125405,0.0002180753,0.0017541962,0.0006574874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003883803,0.00026653506,0.00026557545,0.0009085831,0.0063447813,0.0053859213,0.00045372645,0.002432443,0.016809996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014519483,0.0002904177,0.0002239867,0.0012925097,0.0037443938,0.0032523153,0.0012326438,0.0058974614,0.0021901056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001114006,0.000022256037,0.0014964022,0.0001747827,0.000020075038,0.00040308182,0.015424498,0.00008216789,0.0003576881,0.38059497,0.55557257,0.045740064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005801164,0.000011180907,0.0013688921,0.00010834483,0.0000051472325,0.000128638,0.0035307037,0.000053891352,0.00015873527,0.002329798,0.9922855,0.000013480421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07531607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11441009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07531607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00726119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005392255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14975536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944934404","doi":"10.5539/ells.v9n2p33","title":"Translating and Representing ‘The Aftermath of Daesh’: A Rhetorical Semiotic Study of Some Mosuli Artists’ Works","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language and Literature Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Curtin University of Technology","keywords":"Semiotics; Rhetorical question; Painting; Sociology; Linguistics; Literature; History; Aesthetics; Art; Visual arts; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02196459391807164,"score_gpt":0.26996955707325815,"score_spread":0.2480049631551865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944934404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8898135,0.0019829678,0.0018630656,0.002901167,0.0001803709,0.00010184223,0.000053836608,0.00002771834,0.10307562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926802,0.0006320967,0.00048377836,0.00018463186,0.00007330531,0.000039285955,0.000018491653,0.00002002294,0.005868296],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765944,0.0015826504,0.000058192556,0.00014365156,0.0003369268,0.00021920358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648225,0.0027953226,0.00025147785,0.00011326737,0.00019150882,0.0001661555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034649463,0.0005750478,0.000459249,0.0024615068,0.013039273,0.008823057,0.0009745386,0.0014721706,0.0034645726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00564097,0.00029719018,0.00023801193,0.0021767884,0.018377516,0.0034406518,0.003608865,0.0029435905,0.0004207916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015119984,0.00002218938,0.00036136806,0.00008835316,0.0000021050064,0.0007524313,0.97593915,0.000025724989,0.0010523377,0.017739007,0.0004423959,0.0035598446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008393539,0.00006835679,0.004212254,0.00019716151,0.000009054245,0.0005967126,0.9274626,0.00019961424,0.0014613041,0.0028239847,0.0629439,0.00001668669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027344415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00590089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013039273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004759431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021569128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03453225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945712468","doi":"10.29173/cons29386","title":"The Warren Commission, Postmodernity and the Rise of Conspiratorial Thinking in America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constellations","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernity; Narrative; Postmodernism; Deconstruction (building); Modernity; Enlightenment; Proclamation; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Aesthetics; Identity (music); Media studies; Law; Literature; History; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.01850031189326143,"score_gpt":0.22892387758874375,"score_spread":0.21042356569548232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945712468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18024664,0.038844533,0.004517104,0.16476259,0.0012405327,0.000034229342,0.00004304091,0.00006529493,0.61024606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97620606,0.0029747097,0.00063860137,0.0024913887,0.00032058626,0.00001999318,0.000008289721,0.000031942487,0.01730831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997227,0.0017530742,0.000050497587,0.00024870908,0.00040053864,0.00032019935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945814,0.0035974486,0.00046063366,0.0003546488,0.00069354335,0.0003122754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039127804,0.00020858378,0.00021057142,0.0015101086,0.013274968,0.010159746,0.00050997327,0.0024374689,0.002246576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005682182,0.00020467644,0.000113124945,0.0016785053,0.047673248,0.0075377827,0.003220529,0.0046166335,0.00018228593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062407794,0.00000774944,0.00031719028,0.000014810511,0.0000011321836,0.000052626936,0.08648066,0.000022404767,0.00006262927,0.90140325,0.0062008207,0.0054304544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012978053,0.00001353759,0.002010761,0.00027887832,0.000005639805,0.0001329972,0.06533435,0.0001633315,0.00029840387,0.28720766,0.64452267,0.00001878702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042251833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05480683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042251833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014361296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068310327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10419893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946717826","doi":"10.1353/mos.2019.0003","title":"Group Psychology and Crowd Behaviour in Ira Levin's The Stepford Wives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conformity; Obedience; Collectivism; Milgram experiment; Psychology; Social psychology; Compliance (psychology); Adversary; Group (periodic table); Perception; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Individualism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.037978891061722926,"score_gpt":0.273916118558667,"score_spread":0.23593722749694407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946717826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8803416,0.00047681984,0.00068692904,0.011957883,0.00011453436,0.000021018383,0.000007835928,0.000022981969,0.1063705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886391,0.00008977158,0.00015033939,0.00051151164,0.000015202823,0.000010482592,0.0000023459927,0.000008936102,0.010572157],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983273,0.0011499022,0.00001818165,0.00010117031,0.00018108271,0.00022232447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815613,0.001070549,0.00032781094,0.00006521043,0.00012078287,0.00025948999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017689216,0.00022743986,0.00018478757,0.0010459701,0.012718181,0.003340596,0.00045267495,0.0013713026,0.0034631782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039326847,0.00018557912,0.00009480173,0.00041507295,0.011434174,0.0014321738,0.0031549823,0.0013885049,0.00029753125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005002024,0.00010533646,0.013084493,0.000033597826,0.000007751067,0.0007562175,0.82601374,0.00009426878,0.0011397754,0.12819558,0.011976482,0.018542781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017766843,0.00009240063,0.013227882,0.00011748279,0.0000075071725,0.00034646093,0.73980117,0.00025693074,0.00048275923,0.018316662,0.22729972,0.000033183973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021379257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042677943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021379257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030656923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016521943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042509615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947596529","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v9n3p365","title":"Deconstructing the Discursive Construction of Environmental Colonialism in Native America: A Study of Leslie Marmon Silko’s Ceremony and Almanac of the Dead","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Ceremony; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Hegemony; Power (physics); Objectification; Discourse analysis; Critical discourse analysis; White (mutation); Gender studies; Media studies; Aesthetics; Social science; History; Politics; Political science; Art; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015806033242093554,"score_gpt":0.2463887280147471,"score_spread":0.23058269477265353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947596529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608691,0.001444469,0.0008458235,0.0072632115,0.000079978534,0.00002419524,0.000014043626,0.00001359694,0.0294456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922179,0.0006530838,0.00036416342,0.0006397313,0.00003985037,0.000025472176,0.000009971033,0.00002103629,0.006028801],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698395,0.0023056518,0.000043130116,0.00017679046,0.00020572441,0.0002847579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963343,0.0026958256,0.00027641526,0.000105287865,0.00028503407,0.00030317393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051438725,0.0004179235,0.0005266337,0.0011422776,0.017718025,0.005703097,0.000969812,0.0013714574,0.0017380823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005208763,0.00031230244,0.00019397201,0.00094761094,0.019609226,0.0048085703,0.005458407,0.0033238695,0.0001317085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059996455,0.000006489218,0.00033810778,0.000011729082,7.030607e-7,0.00024714248,0.99314886,0.000009715325,0.00022364287,0.0046379557,0.00028941812,0.0010802164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022954532,0.000015322845,0.0016992359,0.00009711814,0.0000025856464,0.00017169556,0.9598039,0.00006748028,0.00021673573,0.0013618664,0.036550127,0.000011659007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053317614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123633675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053317614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007244778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033124194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10601455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948663690","doi":"10.29173/spectrum56","title":"Vulgar Imagery and Biological Themes: An Analysis of the Nazi’s Anti-Semitic Dialogue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Ideology; The Holocaust; Racism; German; Population; World War II; State (computer science); Sociology; Nazi Germany; Politics; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; History; Art","score_opus":0.03564450951776589,"score_gpt":0.24107552538874572,"score_spread":0.20543101587097984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948663690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90528685,0.0014544675,0.0030614417,0.003976181,0.00018860275,0.000046532128,0.000058767397,0.000027271319,0.08589977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945109,0.00032215018,0.0005224669,0.00019748897,0.00004183787,0.000018149665,0.000024677967,0.000027420157,0.0043349117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967924,0.002309939,0.000065193664,0.00016865564,0.00036963585,0.00029409523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995786,0.0034553236,0.00024995502,0.000108534456,0.00020259895,0.00019749624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034524242,0.00046128058,0.00045366396,0.002940206,0.011266919,0.006426269,0.0010124713,0.0019394886,0.002892923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006563152,0.00027865567,0.00023706409,0.0017489375,0.022378992,0.004054812,0.0046115876,0.0033031933,0.00036887702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019250885,0.00001065453,0.00039732512,0.000038292073,0.0000019097874,0.00032757898,0.9751025,0.000015472531,0.00075124763,0.021155143,0.0003321967,0.0018483758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010702259,0.000031432955,0.002986524,0.00015745194,0.0000067348356,0.00052467186,0.9311388,0.00023477952,0.0007723656,0.00487202,0.05924939,0.000015155331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045969477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006146653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011266919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046539656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014446821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033766985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948799355","doi":"","title":"Revisiting Bucket Truck: Locally Engaged Public Intellectuals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Truck; Political science; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Automotive engineering","score_opus":0.4359785447716115,"score_gpt":0.5122871806215857,"score_spread":0.07630863584997422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948799355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12791258,0.0040805154,0.012737283,0.16706097,0.0024677683,0.00018935674,0.00012468718,0.0005663752,0.6848604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92412716,0.0010592416,0.0024906674,0.011202544,0.0003448575,0.00008142258,0.000048282433,0.0003080811,0.060337793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911732,0.003440213,0.00009960293,0.00064638205,0.0020531893,0.0025873808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922673,0.0041475873,0.00033634328,0.00076870923,0.0015985692,0.0008815745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073405816,0.00070020446,0.0004830203,0.0029846774,0.037504572,0.021519108,0.0037427007,0.0061551705,0.017849047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014800174,0.00043411812,0.00042524503,0.0035731362,0.05760593,0.014622951,0.0149324555,0.010108202,0.0015220672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051289753,0.00002496935,0.0005266264,0.00012955503,0.0000046281993,0.0006194439,0.27678013,0.00018901232,0.00037775093,0.6639921,0.034908853,0.02239563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000162694,0.000022047183,0.0003521415,0.00031047539,0.000010433648,0.00017027477,0.43765205,0.00035791862,0.0004200706,0.056421187,0.5042259,0.000041204137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2883697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3861807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2883697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03698822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031396348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5733824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951189869","doi":"","title":"\"Voices\"; \"Green\"; and \"An Exercise in Rhetoric\"","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08710793700648974,"score_gpt":0.33037840186839634,"score_spread":0.24327046486190662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951189869","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017429269,0.786369,0.0016077702,0.048724376,0.0044720313,0.000025533114,0.000053742016,0.00006782338,0.15693678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096581824,0.8113664,0.0032119472,0.026534248,0.003944636,0.00012491873,0.00007453358,0.00010030555,0.058061212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960788,0.0017912743,0.00026075053,0.0002754692,0.0011786876,0.00041509967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944305,0.003374128,0.00036039893,0.00028469297,0.00128657,0.00026370006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005403947,0.00089126773,0.0011083975,0.008683462,0.0043150773,0.010238793,0.0016366879,0.0037249154,0.009317435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008492018,0.00032294812,0.0003390515,0.0058724913,0.025306277,0.008423916,0.0047358363,0.005039063,0.0020214731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032657274,0.000020048696,0.00015335753,0.003713743,0.000018260203,0.000101906706,0.0046994356,0.00008744401,0.0002461017,0.6675193,0.10515115,0.21825664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010396051,0.000018516093,0.00054618914,0.0057183546,0.000025788842,0.000113325674,0.0046868264,0.000036655714,0.00028310175,0.0377323,0.95080787,0.000020694742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039750926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06827922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039750926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013509494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024218317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098018706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953158531","doi":"","title":"\" ETHICS, MEDIA AND PUBLIC LIFE \"","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Public life; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06896726599559998,"score_gpt":0.2560502114866099,"score_spread":0.1870829454910099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953158531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025531555,0.02521596,0.00902462,0.28822923,0.0020282199,0.000029099825,0.00011338305,0.00007725271,0.6497507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92868805,0.005876391,0.0015076975,0.012758912,0.0033467966,0.0001053905,0.000045713077,0.00008864492,0.047582306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992421,0.006115072,0.00009150546,0.00029973057,0.0007432573,0.0003294274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899496,0.007965551,0.0005955706,0.00047551934,0.0006860486,0.0003277382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005670591,0.0006260805,0.00036340347,0.0025181642,0.005100743,0.012423996,0.0007682585,0.0076147434,0.0073285312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014867281,0.0002902732,0.0002190384,0.0022295255,0.031033749,0.009116083,0.002962464,0.0049511446,0.0009263482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006284105,0.0000057842767,0.000083806844,0.000025207908,0.000001393087,0.000018868186,0.004204102,0.000027815175,0.00004383731,0.98765755,0.005709669,0.0022157864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019547973,0.000013413527,0.0007552737,0.00028784413,0.000010018655,0.00009293977,0.008305496,0.0002833942,0.00031033356,0.7975608,0.19234948,0.000011460118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020389713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016571641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012423996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003715939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030036473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029989302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973664585","doi":"10.1007/s10503-019-09488-w","title":"Place, Image and Argument: The Physical and Nonphysical Dimensions of a Collective Ethos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Argument (complex analysis); Political communication; Communication studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.019995401097422535,"score_gpt":0.26508401134247306,"score_spread":0.24508861024505052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973664585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17893188,0.010468264,0.08779438,0.12649964,0.0014032039,0.00010014402,0.00009437565,0.000089063564,0.5946191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989617,0.00048541106,0.004999583,0.0007880998,0.00022745442,0.00005310471,0.00001437323,0.000039375274,0.0037756383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841732,0.012622259,0.00030211802,0.0007918316,0.0015932804,0.00051733415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95405644,0.03894471,0.0020922069,0.002298493,0.0016283483,0.0009797765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017016228,0.0005056956,0.0007196883,0.0034692758,0.007426323,0.018056454,0.0022151815,0.007808423,0.007674204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035865318,0.0005810307,0.0005011389,0.0021180552,0.0805611,0.022488017,0.0066545554,0.00522542,0.00050681515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020875666,0.000019727398,0.000250057,0.00006938258,0.0000071688423,0.00005883854,0.017946005,0.00009854993,0.00011663872,0.97724104,0.0007468716,0.003424762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046390713,0.00002533398,0.0007090672,0.00021338263,0.000014269607,0.00013264288,0.018431466,0.0007066319,0.00024617033,0.95896745,0.020486912,0.000020210187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011587887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012164777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018056454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030074466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003598672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08999151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976151420","doi":"","title":"Rhetoric Deployed in the Communication Between the National Energy Board and Aboriginal Communities in the Case of the Trans Mountain Pipeline","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Young scholars in writing","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Indigenous; Rhetoric; Government (linguistics); Indigenous rights; Supreme court; Duty; Political science; Declaration; Power (physics); Human rights; Rhetorical question; Law; Corporation; Public administration; Ecology","score_opus":0.03889156711376563,"score_gpt":0.2970070169938019,"score_spread":0.25811544988003626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976151420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17176452,0.0036615164,0.011172032,0.1644706,0.0019953048,0.00018455506,0.00007347124,0.00011134718,0.64656675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659747,0.00061232835,0.0021810068,0.008403223,0.0001401008,0.00005682236,0.000014100593,0.000056796784,0.022560842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98546475,0.008228338,0.00029427354,0.0006609184,0.0031962856,0.0021554714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844886,0.011406426,0.0007068099,0.00033368554,0.0022265518,0.0008378476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01666104,0.0005923816,0.00041825688,0.002968751,0.042701397,0.012599457,0.00208999,0.0062333527,0.0027068276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02155522,0.00047588968,0.00040083856,0.002753005,0.048942905,0.005852069,0.0074723186,0.008857835,0.00040399225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001812645,0.000006717028,0.00045128242,0.00008654534,0.0000033225615,0.00091743283,0.6511744,0.00009447984,0.0005600878,0.3313304,0.0096592335,0.0056979647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018349425,0.00002508313,0.001602066,0.00075757795,0.000030427624,0.00066826725,0.53139603,0.00048341232,0.001233154,0.03533274,0.4283781,0.000074772004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6000524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6851904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39994758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04751604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058068905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8046059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990046684","doi":"10.29173/axismundi65","title":"Burton Mack's A Myth of Innocence as Can(n)on Criticism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Axis Mundi","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Gospel; Mythology; Criticism; Literature; Ideology; Narrative; Identity (music); Philosophy; Art; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Law; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.07839918212224006,"score_gpt":0.3099084447981219,"score_spread":0.23150926267588184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990046684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018943982,0.022706898,0.0041091545,0.23323578,0.007627273,0.000031411262,0.000034979796,0.00008788394,0.71322256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65197414,0.006520511,0.001993228,0.03494161,0.0023795252,0.00011451637,0.00002286096,0.00014982159,0.30190384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974438,0.0015433063,0.000036561647,0.00024879636,0.00054019084,0.00018746853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982224,0.0009901484,0.00015644402,0.00013160998,0.00033148078,0.00016781992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021008954,0.00040256252,0.00026206087,0.0007233846,0.007713933,0.008337115,0.0008439594,0.0031172866,0.004883885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056036874,0.00017043261,0.00017826808,0.0005887053,0.016882846,0.006694608,0.0025708424,0.0054728393,0.00086997857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027245622,0.00001287768,0.00024421967,0.00008809425,0.0000035316557,0.00018385089,0.04321004,0.00004468339,0.00023523475,0.8122864,0.13071334,0.0129505405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005174078,0.000017381499,0.00031049902,0.00024606314,0.000003618018,0.00022078762,0.018691959,0.000101879166,0.00022417361,0.08556425,0.89460325,0.000010904016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005141601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009173627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008337115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00446511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020059443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032396734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992886693","doi":"","title":"Discourses of dehumanization: enemy construction and Canadian media complicity in the framing of the war on terror","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Dehumanization; Adversary; Framing (construction); Hacker; Media studies; Political science; Computer security; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0360696696495148,"score_gpt":0.23743928907335746,"score_spread":0.20136961942384266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992886693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6514856,0.0042994623,0.0018377516,0.021336589,0.00034954795,0.000050360904,0.00020674805,0.00007050596,0.3203634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993802,0.0009089305,0.00030321692,0.000530352,0.000028838875,0.000008215991,0.000030357149,0.000026532927,0.004361581],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583286,0.0016116728,0.00007054053,0.0003465545,0.0013097946,0.0008286115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931993,0.003725394,0.0007466119,0.00029188237,0.001484757,0.000552077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004591945,0.0008060325,0.00040991922,0.0054929745,0.03171922,0.01258515,0.0013279099,0.0018390057,0.0053662453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010419464,0.00043791367,0.0002615175,0.004958176,0.03173154,0.0040703486,0.005736496,0.0033645509,0.00020242395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006310444,0.000014861709,0.003699843,0.00008945466,0.000011089954,0.0005087382,0.8930892,0.00009239994,0.0009047741,0.087521754,0.004231816,0.00977308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015438462,0.000020877604,0.010906915,0.00028751793,0.00004134897,0.0002861611,0.7557148,0.00028700795,0.0010909182,0.006733328,0.22453338,0.000082275394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94537455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079353176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079353176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043752357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5757503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994710252","doi":"10.7202/1064844ar","title":"Hazard Adams's \"Insiders and Outsiders\"","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surfaces","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hazard; Humanism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04002592429732929,"score_gpt":0.23695678110668938,"score_spread":0.1969308568093601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994710252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01430294,0.023092907,0.0092725875,0.686532,0.013149719,0.00003977914,0.00010298941,0.00008739605,0.2534196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62954044,0.01720842,0.0038620273,0.10108109,0.011516647,0.00014539903,0.00007759578,0.0002837838,0.23628464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937395,0.0033353576,0.00008075099,0.0005044411,0.0018330092,0.000506915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406695,0.0039279694,0.00023995663,0.0002306415,0.0008179255,0.00071652065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005542837,0.00065230223,0.0005141856,0.0012634576,0.012756425,0.013482551,0.0013407405,0.006444233,0.007937701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01048221,0.00044077684,0.0003071583,0.0015842393,0.01682295,0.014957648,0.0061102062,0.012070474,0.0011566586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005033341,0.000015071178,0.00023369951,0.00011540698,0.000003121095,0.00011258028,0.02694426,0.000067905625,0.0001965192,0.6803685,0.2769653,0.014927339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011168249,0.000023377428,0.00036365178,0.00017650661,0.0000044867156,0.0001747783,0.02581731,0.00017378289,0.00033069152,0.091044486,0.88186145,0.000018321422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009496287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012066182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013482551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050932807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038085137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036954463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995174355","doi":"10.1525/lavc.2019.140006","title":"Dialogues","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Latin American and Latinx Visual Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Representation (politics); Visual anthropology; Ethnography; Discipline; Materiality (auditing); Media studies; Context (archaeology); Latin Americans; Political science; Visual arts; Humanities; Social science; Art; Anthropology; Politics; Aesthetics; History; Law","score_opus":0.031189700885252948,"score_gpt":0.2727112148787158,"score_spread":0.24152151399346286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995174355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033001555,0.0026339567,0.004794685,0.02310882,0.015127677,0.00026203357,0.00083270564,0.0004427296,0.9494973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067885645,0.0022081365,0.0036786012,0.011381932,0.0039667427,0.0006590794,0.0013788474,0.0008114558,0.9080295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418527,0.002816992,0.0003151611,0.0009346606,0.0011349907,0.0006129055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952992,0.0018105909,0.00022566145,0.00074922154,0.0011443925,0.00077093416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003211251,0.0008747077,0.00061144197,0.0015302626,0.007873659,0.010519974,0.0016202636,0.0035489206,0.18517466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01180409,0.000330433,0.0005909616,0.001479859,0.0031839742,0.00699192,0.008841934,0.0048182164,0.07348417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013427042,0.000090982314,0.00031649676,0.00028628024,0.000009092658,0.00040797287,0.0276326,0.00010515524,0.0006206813,0.33034056,0.55518985,0.084866114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032779024,0.000005621165,0.000048720467,0.00006299457,7.897236e-7,0.000044856864,0.0019824468,0.000017963659,0.000053971806,0.0040016407,0.9937744,0.0000033031483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001088428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013746873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18517466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033689283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002508115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996463566","doi":"10.7202/1064964ar","title":"HIROSHIMA, THE VIETNAM VETERAN'S MEMORIAL, AND THE GULF WAR: POST-NATIONAL SPECTACLES","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surfaces","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnam War; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); History; Order (exchange); Gulf war; Political science; Economic history; Art; Literature; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02695798713723849,"score_gpt":0.24078534475554342,"score_spread":0.21382735761830493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996463566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70392346,0.01737036,0.0007511215,0.050651774,0.0013445404,0.000017731489,0.00004886767,0.000026052916,0.22586608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906494,0.0017828089,0.00006594189,0.00054322014,0.00016290018,0.000006802353,0.000008557079,0.0000101579835,0.006770262],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991714,0.00042907437,0.000021478314,0.000060989867,0.000099622055,0.00021757757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.0012766465,0.00028552415,0.00009599324,0.00013879113,0.00018522037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002026496,0.00034452457,0.00025336933,0.00095432653,0.016006412,0.0080579575,0.0005912089,0.001789206,0.004748588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043445453,0.00017912222,0.00011026702,0.0015542872,0.019613974,0.0051280377,0.004892971,0.0035445997,0.00021960071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047697755,0.000013870993,0.0014219916,0.00008478518,0.000004901781,0.0009871679,0.76364875,0.000055104665,0.00027445206,0.22003445,0.0045818174,0.008845024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070899546,0.000030089734,0.0018217801,0.00023867915,0.000009609152,0.00029978214,0.8644701,0.000053708107,0.00036862967,0.010633892,0.122054785,0.000011880381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026231095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04409833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026231095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054811304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043066856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052156866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999802691","doi":"10.3968/11462","title":"Literary Discourse and Human Rights in Martin Luther King’s Speech: ‘I Have a Dream.’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Destiny (ISS module); Human rights; Power (physics); Dream; Sociology; Mores; Literary criticism; Law; Aesthetics; Literature; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02480504512211834,"score_gpt":0.3168981958801553,"score_spread":0.29209315075803693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999802691","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25696695,0.07540863,0.0036575452,0.33019012,0.004931474,0.000049897306,0.000103969636,0.00012032576,0.3285711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684911,0.0031542564,0.000377736,0.004305829,0.0005226682,0.000026193917,0.000014847672,0.00004864577,0.023058785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951161,0.003667935,0.000102459344,0.00019581217,0.00057482737,0.00034271943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922084,0.005943501,0.00077703974,0.00028702724,0.0004131251,0.0003708955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038484165,0.00046929918,0.00036237357,0.0016046276,0.010387471,0.0072395806,0.00067265885,0.0034900515,0.0027505308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010142952,0.00027840765,0.00023156583,0.0011049227,0.026410937,0.0057704803,0.0040432857,0.0032318714,0.0006090747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031891897,0.000011036418,0.00038783596,0.00015656702,0.0000052112014,0.00053525803,0.6428067,0.00005403247,0.00028064643,0.3256534,0.022680998,0.0073963623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010052844,0.00003405188,0.0022725973,0.0009703213,0.000012001217,0.0008403776,0.2896169,0.00019375727,0.000784601,0.035348624,0.6698814,0.000035264762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008195829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011502742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010387471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00649382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04711622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000082275","doi":"10.1386/ejpc_00006_1","title":"Conciliatory aggression and the rhetoric of public apologies: A rhetorical analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Blame; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Plea; Rhetoric; Remorse; Criticism; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.11587957711850973,"score_gpt":0.2930691115673217,"score_spread":0.17718953444881197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000082275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14483531,0.008361924,0.08268832,0.089932516,0.0022904507,0.00023179295,0.00011159641,0.00029211227,0.67125595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98428506,0.0005515199,0.0041365,0.0021803894,0.00068961293,0.000095299045,0.000020009837,0.0000845588,0.007957076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730032,0.021214271,0.0003724925,0.00091722637,0.0036518266,0.0008409673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92221785,0.06831501,0.003317942,0.0018405521,0.0036953231,0.0006133945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015124838,0.00062236015,0.00064952485,0.0043918923,0.0082205245,0.010629734,0.001844501,0.0067913635,0.005160441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0437741,0.000489364,0.00045436076,0.0019157113,0.029589169,0.009272577,0.0052818977,0.006664069,0.000634487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003916526,0.000028671988,0.00021366558,0.00008954585,0.000008478196,0.00021965626,0.040926334,0.00018880231,0.00027146,0.95017666,0.0036430154,0.0041945893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101781014,0.0001367311,0.0015390469,0.0011792514,0.000049467053,0.00080203696,0.053122997,0.0068128025,0.0020980798,0.6771226,0.25695288,0.0000822958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014642411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001245202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015124838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007871738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029466557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07998878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002126060","doi":"10.1177/2158244020901800","title":"“Superbugs” in the Risk Society: Assessing the Reflexive Function of North American Newspaper Coverage of Antimicrobial Resistance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAGE Open","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Risk society; Reflexivity; Elite; Modernization theory; Mass media; Resistance (ecology); Function (biology); News media; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.060077961538520595,"score_gpt":0.2977424210534801,"score_spread":0.2376644595149595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002126060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528677,0.0012696816,0.0008822065,0.0058836597,0.00011130422,0.00006451834,0.00005240679,0.000014047292,0.038854443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970402,0.000556568,0.0004359737,0.0007475622,0.0001231004,0.000056139208,0.000031432137,0.000015966596,0.000992868],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707032,0.021903822,0.0010241942,0.0013421583,0.003986638,0.0010399201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77733445,0.18526669,0.021241624,0.005015625,0.0092925085,0.0018491417],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032723658,0.00041725032,0.00041965127,0.007534575,0.0061807698,0.011076198,0.0010810224,0.0013667659,0.0027351948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08803095,0.00042233593,0.00020898848,0.005191557,0.016824149,0.009421254,0.006693723,0.002108684,0.00026163546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010833302,0.00006379116,0.03060317,0.00032410718,0.000030970365,0.00023056843,0.9320083,0.000047547557,0.00058908714,0.01238301,0.0007612922,0.022849755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009724666,0.00013380364,0.06906227,0.0005541151,0.00005335356,0.00013710203,0.9048793,0.00020127455,0.00072810496,0.0041201105,0.020092163,0.000028618277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005269388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064279987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99381924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005031027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00248569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17306125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007744576","doi":"10.7330/9781607329329.c005","title":"Rhetoric as Persistently “Troublesome Knowledge: Implications for Disciplinarity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Utah State University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Harvard University; University of Cambridge; Utah State University","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10548524951069273,"score_gpt":0.2617389791064359,"score_spread":0.15625372959574318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007744576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03616327,0.010269605,0.024253495,0.4582528,0.0019453749,0.00007643504,0.00010004676,0.00019450473,0.46874443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94050896,0.002696617,0.0059514875,0.017552687,0.0024289144,0.00020527952,0.000058317433,0.00024388544,0.030353842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834938,0.0110327415,0.00039306557,0.0011988566,0.0028523828,0.0010291587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95746136,0.033856183,0.0016138895,0.0028373145,0.0033027246,0.00092858175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015859935,0.0006036544,0.000863414,0.0038427354,0.018111072,0.031005228,0.0042421776,0.013603171,0.007757346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032538015,0.000494434,0.00046963117,0.0037860367,0.10415558,0.027644835,0.010620922,0.014811338,0.00091178634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036232457,0.0000070674996,0.00006114619,0.000022944825,0.0000013533569,0.000040889765,0.023901295,0.000023858707,0.000039268627,0.9692081,0.0040282425,0.002662144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011078854,0.000008150964,0.00027425098,0.00024271302,0.0000073710557,0.00013556342,0.041410446,0.00030240702,0.00033467833,0.8469189,0.110336415,0.00001806001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008210757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00844613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031005228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009175721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010056138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08387631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010500650","doi":"10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect215","title":"<scp>C</scp>arey,<scp>J</scp>ames","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Columbia university; Sociology; Art history; Media studies; Art","score_opus":0.02413248349823776,"score_gpt":0.25669924411309053,"score_spread":0.23256676061485276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010500650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006858505,0.0017832754,0.00081044674,0.008721599,0.0028297554,0.000040268576,0.0013207513,0.0004482132,0.98335993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008889634,0.0017116723,0.00051311665,0.0006802253,0.00044787984,0.000041641877,0.0005516471,0.0005251348,0.98663914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992592,0.00012535477,0.000035658093,0.00010222126,0.00040520154,0.00007233415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965996,0.0005267277,0.0001350064,0.00030266526,0.0018885414,0.0005475947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009424754,0.0004691426,0.0003941878,0.0023677307,0.0036416207,0.007010475,0.0007706581,0.0011038387,0.50246257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058833915,0.00018282015,0.00021646643,0.0026046268,0.0014384977,0.0026270284,0.0025607892,0.0019956147,0.1821144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016834545,0.000022582777,0.0001705562,0.000121765406,0.0000016923326,0.00009014084,0.000407128,0.00007484385,0.00015389449,0.019708663,0.9152126,0.06401936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012663832,0.0000017303448,0.00019727812,0.0001454714,6.8863284e-7,0.00004961163,0.00030458788,0.000054724977,0.00015876023,0.0017628775,0.9973201,0.0000028772831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016841125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03231959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49753743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003362345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034473783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70967674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011716805","doi":"10.22215/etd/2015-10832","title":"The Discursive Enactment of Edward Snowden","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); HERO; Media studies; Sociology; Digital media; Ethnography; Social media; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Literature; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04657082828537124,"score_gpt":0.29765896480328624,"score_spread":0.251088136517915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011716805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67501545,0.010059838,0.005659329,0.056061994,0.0014119726,0.00006200766,0.00007690588,0.000095738855,0.25155675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622129,0.0019708134,0.00052013353,0.0022187675,0.00017111175,0.00001660584,0.000016889378,0.00007745101,0.032795224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568164,0.0028055038,0.00010226135,0.00036565168,0.00061842403,0.00042647764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914786,0.0068023815,0.0005860257,0.00026550752,0.00049559784,0.000371897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037696357,0.00049983704,0.0003378578,0.0011184434,0.012687334,0.007107995,0.000642959,0.001963576,0.0023878943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011167284,0.0003773937,0.00016486962,0.00093364244,0.01934724,0.004944062,0.0060027307,0.0030652988,0.0004698757],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007968636,0.000008203671,0.0015810293,0.00012915945,0.000011174211,0.0014626866,0.8900143,0.00012224083,0.0016006106,0.08233429,0.013370504,0.00928605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064192914,0.00005427687,0.0019939363,0.00044071625,0.000012545776,0.00080325024,0.5301885,0.00026869387,0.0025563356,0.012249194,0.45138365,0.000042451207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014588513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0250118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014588513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004478567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018957892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032494485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014611328","doi":"10.22215/etd/2019-13607","title":"Reframing MAiD in the Media: Rationalizing and Normalizing a New Mode of Dying in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Consciousness; Mode (computer interface); Key (lock); Media studies; Social media; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.036272919095513105,"score_gpt":0.2581192403775793,"score_spread":0.22184632128206616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014611328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4955082,0.009944278,0.0034240978,0.14722127,0.0014024135,0.00020165018,0.00047431406,0.00010153717,0.3417223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96616066,0.004699357,0.0010156023,0.006204128,0.000118594086,0.0000461773,0.00007234041,0.00005275837,0.021630239],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925867,0.0020317722,0.00019308498,0.0005567664,0.0027260738,0.0019055515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865231,0.004978575,0.00085671,0.00029172841,0.005132594,0.0022172097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093163,0.00054399,0.00046221793,0.0032162948,0.04237021,0.017245807,0.0023154698,0.002638061,0.0034215786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021521933,0.00031879515,0.00037061019,0.004207189,0.03420975,0.003980402,0.008060901,0.008333099,0.00035421693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413906,0.000021217324,0.0042140717,0.00015444894,0.000009956753,0.00039731627,0.83811873,0.00021479769,0.0004658837,0.12056628,0.017167201,0.018628687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008894479,0.0000144696805,0.0051378203,0.0006133806,0.00002368387,0.00011057188,0.6619061,0.00026997793,0.00062337687,0.00491865,0.32630748,0.00006559087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25556841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25556841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3306155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86343515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018204526","doi":"10.3366/hlps.2020.0226","title":"Illegally Blonde: The Racialisation of Blondness and Visual Representations of Palestinian Activist Ahed Tamimi in American and Canadian Media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Medical Research Group","funders":"","keywords":"Orientalism; Representation (politics); Colonialism; Critical discourse analysis; Ideology; Sociology; Media studies; Semiotics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Gender studies; State (computer science); Power (physics); Frame analysis; History; Content analysis; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07937844638816835,"score_gpt":0.3154006235849701,"score_spread":0.23602217719680177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018204526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94619316,0.0007126818,0.00018039517,0.0015715782,0.00005900605,0.000021993803,0.00013682916,0.000013203426,0.051111247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955123,0.00045186124,0.00013781436,0.00018407984,0.000017834696,0.00000924317,0.000066782,0.000012237635,0.0036077776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923253,0.0001913573,0.000016594737,0.00008718269,0.00023203088,0.00024039566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846715,0.000613832,0.0002793423,0.00007849916,0.00036515197,0.0001959506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001400403,0.0004878162,0.0002172679,0.00399903,0.012877924,0.0073266095,0.0007339987,0.00084996974,0.0030395512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034827623,0.00026180665,0.0001402887,0.0030089868,0.0100825215,0.0018786257,0.0028049855,0.001653658,0.00015039637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057205758,0.000015168949,0.007989692,0.000057322133,0.0000060778507,0.00034016455,0.97589284,0.00002078354,0.000951383,0.0040999306,0.0016493762,0.008919973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031181244,0.0000113071565,0.02270499,0.0001006386,0.000012634174,0.00015593976,0.94641006,0.000081601975,0.00033999785,0.00030405127,0.029856954,0.000018710782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74206275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.875032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25793725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014197011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076070465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51891255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30243353","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.017","title":"Celebrity and credibility in environmental communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Credibility; Persuasion; Rhetoric; Ethos; Rhetorical question; Government (linguistics); Population; Power (physics); Political science; Source credibility; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Art; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09437590584171776,"score_gpt":0.21322544926056902,"score_spread":0.11884954341885126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30243353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40138716,0.0073641776,0.010366336,0.024623947,0.0006229536,0.00008973623,0.00012913322,0.00010779415,0.5553088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270695,0.00053559925,0.00069130375,0.0004244143,0.00014254259,0.0000121436515,0.000018832021,0.000023207098,0.0054448782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919606,0.0049669784,0.00015491816,0.00035769521,0.0021158361,0.00044396374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959,0.031780887,0.004059383,0.0011756015,0.0031832426,0.00080087176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008746537,0.00045033684,0.00031820577,0.004019121,0.0076496485,0.0098956805,0.00088333414,0.0027557178,0.0062014065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032766294,0.00026077204,0.00022918615,0.0018312293,0.013419464,0.0058488348,0.0035427562,0.0025906,0.0004895987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027012685,0.0000796989,0.013190782,0.00064132304,0.000062604064,0.0020655668,0.48256832,0.00066163944,0.003420815,0.40483236,0.008914656,0.08329211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101279715,0.00028404678,0.04967065,0.002424023,0.00015662487,0.002809549,0.33192044,0.0053887116,0.0055918987,0.14132968,0.46007383,0.00024926916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021286685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017365376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021286685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008900196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035094135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06457573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042164973","doi":"10.7202/1069854ar","title":"The Speaking Body and the Silent Mouth","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnologies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Trial by ordeal; Torture; Silence; Folklore; Criminology; Sociology; History; Psychology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08302393286560003,"score_gpt":0.2664805494966876,"score_spread":0.18345661663108756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042164973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29434022,0.004482867,0.021413105,0.015958756,0.00070100167,0.00009271122,0.000104211686,0.0002432088,0.66266394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96909225,0.00091865135,0.0021672866,0.0006952852,0.00016217279,0.00003774755,0.00003124527,0.00013117542,0.026764063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609655,0.002421634,0.000094644754,0.0002854562,0.00074150384,0.0003601467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950364,0.0034685095,0.00053139776,0.00040654602,0.00030064778,0.00025644107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022789564,0.00045399016,0.00033691086,0.00160964,0.00785919,0.007837573,0.00079836545,0.002071559,0.006967276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00653056,0.0003207756,0.00023900521,0.00073286117,0.029874863,0.0071968334,0.0043600653,0.0025700699,0.0015602034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005489762,0.000022761235,0.001186932,0.00021948664,0.000006570288,0.0011064794,0.6036863,0.00008430012,0.0032781682,0.35704383,0.0036319422,0.029678458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023774684,0.00012430936,0.0042478335,0.00095494936,0.000041025727,0.0026490965,0.5643853,0.00049062446,0.005189326,0.083884776,0.33794695,0.00006203775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043893494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004323097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00785919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018690465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022140048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02330786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042436146","doi":"10.4000/ere.5558","title":"Pour en lire plus : « Telling our stories »,","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éducation relative à l environnement","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Environmental education; Ethnology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07369931908720002,"score_gpt":0.2952232509193557,"score_spread":0.22152393183215568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042436146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015457234,0.06337747,0.008669849,0.5988172,0.039593365,0.000105451574,0.00052487134,0.00028400362,0.27317053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3218514,0.049211536,0.008476025,0.20114349,0.018150613,0.0002028265,0.00058897963,0.0005614457,0.3998137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954645,0.0019934252,0.0001917604,0.00040822715,0.0013144322,0.00062770786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935289,0.0031100374,0.00056137936,0.00046565777,0.0014237785,0.000910261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035019356,0.0006240648,0.0003729058,0.0015565872,0.009949007,0.014224759,0.0013784571,0.0053114896,0.016311076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01365482,0.0002456251,0.00039551652,0.0020629594,0.011818204,0.014281557,0.0051583825,0.00644459,0.004061474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053198844,0.000027154138,0.001643062,0.0006697159,0.000024099529,0.0002899625,0.15166177,0.00006375028,0.0011982402,0.15419245,0.622968,0.06720855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015624236,0.0000067967294,0.00075080135,0.00013221288,0.000004471514,0.00015854173,0.036506925,0.000025462896,0.00022763674,0.0052044196,0.956967,0.000014352264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06359615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16078784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06359615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062535508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065178075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12645197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044369604","doi":"10.1177/1461444820912541","title":"Picturing the pipeline: Mapping settler colonialism on Instagram","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Media & Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Colonialism; Mainstream; Sociology; Indigenous; Hegemony; Citizen journalism; Politics; Pipeline (software); Media studies; Aesthetics; Political science; History; Ecology; Archaeology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.11368530118530788,"score_gpt":0.2529345457864173,"score_spread":0.13924924460110938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044369604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85943884,0.0005256788,0.0028019643,0.0012257148,0.000044193894,0.00012022795,0.0024349575,0.00018552813,0.13322295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826414,0.00043982995,0.0032914751,0.000120696466,0.000016917445,0.000056539302,0.00082673336,0.00011289978,0.012493507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994831,0.00010415631,0.000009944451,0.000066842156,0.00019495403,0.0001410146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991171,0.00037013803,0.00009139097,0.00009457888,0.00022778504,0.000099119796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005544752,0.00022012752,0.00016705308,0.0034757457,0.0040953425,0.00508396,0.00048966944,0.00050313555,0.006192955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017495855,0.00017186363,0.0001581413,0.005985358,0.003927818,0.0016900918,0.0023001223,0.0008165389,0.0005212725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001680783,0.00004350007,0.061321195,0.00035704687,0.000026399934,0.0016352151,0.75623715,0.00052701967,0.010405337,0.022201091,0.019076573,0.12800151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056777176,0.000025026216,0.13704371,0.00025493605,0.000022998312,0.0004178956,0.6435267,0.00096536207,0.0023190873,0.0013358056,0.21403044,0.000052343887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73703605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91549855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73703605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075768754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065185023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5290252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044469180","doi":"10.24124/c677/20191697","title":"Rhetoric Revisited: Decennial Reflections on Canada's Coalition Crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Legitimacy; Sociology; Politics; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09143035136228868,"score_gpt":0.33919758002166295,"score_spread":0.24776722865937428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044469180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10044519,0.052801557,0.0015813014,0.6404101,0.0048734467,0.00005535921,0.00035631997,0.00010250122,0.19937418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8887439,0.014349978,0.00054481445,0.061149023,0.0011237254,0.000044937096,0.00010312597,0.00014980104,0.03379073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876303,0.0028764626,0.00025504336,0.00074257643,0.0054277014,0.003067896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743721,0.013755682,0.00092870166,0.0004316393,0.007831472,0.0026804253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013907838,0.00059307157,0.0009088148,0.005184671,0.03714415,0.020408519,0.0029498027,0.008317914,0.0050221602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024502493,0.0005300963,0.00044033967,0.007872508,0.027313799,0.005236792,0.005699662,0.015120883,0.00038296636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011278758,0.00003895493,0.0015923363,0.00050755066,0.00003769245,0.0011504639,0.30637673,0.00044158165,0.00056765566,0.49111497,0.1625425,0.035516787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003111967,0.000020038178,0.003922511,0.000653523,0.000040176485,0.00015844166,0.13871798,0.00030851256,0.000538106,0.014776271,0.8407572,0.000076077275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97576356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98492175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22643399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22643399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23180926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8972269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045258816","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v10n5p231","title":"The Truth Behind Voice and Power in My Feudal Lord: A Speech Act Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Deference; Power (physics); Feeling; Psychology; Pathos; Feudalism; Law; Social psychology; Literature; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03185094577952413,"score_gpt":0.27954439859988983,"score_spread":0.2476934528203657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045258816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452847,0.000500831,0.019922718,0.0015418814,0.00006846211,0.00010750652,0.00011578333,0.000041048585,0.03241695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921434,0.00018503478,0.0032474739,0.00007812779,0.000015992251,0.000036972702,0.000058210615,0.000028370725,0.0042063445],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964696,0.0026596591,0.0000922521,0.00016746807,0.00047963363,0.0001312767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928438,0.005957826,0.00040366082,0.00021985204,0.00047155438,0.00010319452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023173818,0.00027030104,0.00021142101,0.0013017972,0.0019798968,0.0039100014,0.00043914287,0.0007663111,0.0013597038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075056134,0.00017469052,0.00018315724,0.000921327,0.0061014155,0.002087841,0.001139687,0.0012462925,0.0002463343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009020532,0.000055923825,0.008421479,0.00011891942,0.000011739567,0.0010912685,0.9071571,0.0003225513,0.0040491656,0.04827372,0.0011189454,0.029288847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015133793,0.00013858422,0.027956739,0.00035016413,0.00003116556,0.00151214,0.86015445,0.0071751573,0.00831256,0.016015401,0.078273855,0.00006464685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004070992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035409806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004070992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018111314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009118289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013140738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307671889","doi":"10.20381/ruor-18662","title":"Translating the epidemic of fear-based rhetoric in Canadian press: A case study and framework","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11732064949606448,"score_gpt":0.34127674189398616,"score_spread":0.2239560923979217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W307671889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8219884,0.004142605,0.0026378168,0.022499723,0.00024257466,0.00080651476,0.0002896978,0.00007234214,0.14732027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98385394,0.002423598,0.0023473485,0.0013823272,0.00005432952,0.00015342646,0.00008316131,0.000035084868,0.009666842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656,0.006897953,0.0003811459,0.00055796443,0.0028161313,0.002786802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779139,0.015189606,0.0013389506,0.0006583265,0.0037214644,0.0011776553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010769302,0.0013292416,0.00078753685,0.0060268342,0.037812803,0.014786012,0.00305924,0.006291479,0.0031945247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021221958,0.0007027796,0.00059317163,0.011131331,0.026751263,0.004424251,0.0061113737,0.0041633863,0.00038796235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006122828,0.00010464626,0.0040472206,0.0002979852,0.000010728015,0.008412843,0.94200563,0.00020449895,0.00088218774,0.030652601,0.0026809697,0.010639461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021577114,0.000069649526,0.004514234,0.0003825567,0.000038062142,0.0016049936,0.9287893,0.00045678817,0.0009976809,0.0017620842,0.0613106,0.000052584644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8746093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90332824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12539071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08669348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069011725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6290082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082859810","doi":"10.3138/cjh-2019-0028","title":"What We Talk about When We Talk about Vínland: History, Whiteness, Indigenous Erasure, and the Early Norse Presence in Newfoundland","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Colonialism; History; Narrative; Politics; Ephemeral key; Political history; Ethnology; Witness; Anthropology; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Archaeology; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.04935048378332118,"score_gpt":0.22546797293831636,"score_spread":0.17611748915499517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082859810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57988036,0.01283629,0.0025938798,0.045245737,0.0013366087,0.000031564818,0.00015777562,0.000054812917,0.357863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675753,0.0018768053,0.00042784284,0.0023539278,0.000092211914,0.000012827307,0.000029032568,0.000030516392,0.027601544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904746,0.0003944381,0.000022241047,0.00011135764,0.00010713235,0.00031731738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789256,0.0012861422,0.00024944704,0.00007397814,0.00022238561,0.00027552352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015456893,0.00038603085,0.00028496888,0.0011598709,0.015716007,0.007947094,0.0006860894,0.0012667418,0.0035664076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026421933,0.00022676947,0.00014316032,0.0010813613,0.02530033,0.004472798,0.0029053395,0.0032572297,0.00026395786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032994405,0.00001414761,0.0049789357,0.00011738646,0.00001347677,0.00092111237,0.92985564,0.00008675277,0.00067727343,0.047550585,0.0057213358,0.010030303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026640325,0.000017173152,0.010093265,0.0004887534,0.000023074339,0.00035492497,0.8307584,0.00006214157,0.00054109766,0.003000181,0.15462974,0.000028501268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60850954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7982905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39149046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022687757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008620865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78759205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085451","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-1288-1_2","title":"Controversies and Texts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.04310253517227777,"score_gpt":0.20367632824573523,"score_spread":0.16057379307345745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001123776,0.011080117,0.0023028653,0.011454122,0.0010834791,0.000023847579,0.000046970603,0.000051489507,0.9728334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07704829,0.010083689,0.0018580089,0.004095494,0.0026880456,0.00013942749,0.00019389499,0.00033986333,0.90355325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632794,0.0020806466,0.00011229899,0.0003247351,0.000923686,0.00023058898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965983,0.0022855138,0.0001377738,0.0003107947,0.00047765183,0.00018987831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002916238,0.0008657413,0.0008050704,0.0045550778,0.00843179,0.02213147,0.0017338952,0.0052674315,0.057587557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008653458,0.00045367004,0.0004303755,0.004443125,0.014528675,0.017201293,0.0055403747,0.0063327616,0.012098601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008386929,0.00001804915,0.00001909292,0.000075203076,0.0000025161578,0.000037922022,0.0049464433,0.000051793533,0.000048987586,0.8998897,0.07147324,0.023428591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006806634,0.000004699559,0.000049797425,0.00037679353,0.0000040041427,0.000051644914,0.0027846715,0.00009309721,0.00010395693,0.18176082,0.814756,0.0000075591147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032488157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005919548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057587557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065098274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047583487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1926496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087892883","doi":"","title":"Stories Made to Matter: Power, Public Memory, and the Visual Rhetoric of Treaty 1 Representations at Lower Fort Garry","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossings","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Negotiation; Indigenous; Interpreter; Colonialism; Rhetoric; Power (physics); Law; Political science; History; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.062231543404610686,"score_gpt":0.3034817920212847,"score_spread":0.24125024861667405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087892883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20054916,0.00786262,0.0026442823,0.0925867,0.0012426048,0.000031042804,0.00009245,0.000080533726,0.69491065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821645,0.0009880911,0.00020076164,0.0014728686,0.00025559214,0.000014386652,0.000019877982,0.000058651847,0.014825283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394774,0.0044222805,0.00007002143,0.00028152997,0.0005961095,0.00068223267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98811555,0.0095164385,0.0009386974,0.00042349647,0.00056124636,0.000444569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058255936,0.00068386167,0.00033254942,0.0026822584,0.020871866,0.015466139,0.0015772802,0.004088699,0.0095767155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016159322,0.0003815459,0.00018322362,0.0023005349,0.052501667,0.011316988,0.0074764257,0.006437773,0.0006939394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002702542,0.00001379226,0.00036969592,0.00005871291,0.0000043647524,0.00031969792,0.69558746,0.000059279533,0.00011481263,0.28649506,0.01059955,0.006350584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018181992,0.00003218239,0.0009868207,0.0006709021,0.000017187134,0.00029618514,0.63929987,0.0002225081,0.0005414013,0.05528219,0.302607,0.000025517626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033087358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045858886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010095879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005035662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07325107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088975637","doi":"","title":"‘A text in process’: The Progressive Aspect in Gertrude Stein's The Making of Americans","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Narrative; Focus (optics); Teleology; Verb; Linguistics; Syntax; Timeline; Grammar; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07319739455784394,"score_gpt":0.3183992027838615,"score_spread":0.2452018082260176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088975637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17307968,0.004536019,0.035858545,0.028941305,0.0013020749,0.000050067953,0.000069431575,0.0001700176,0.7559929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97647697,0.00067361665,0.0027968031,0.00082860934,0.00011942748,0.000017324763,0.000014245037,0.00008247866,0.018990405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981786,0.0012251623,0.000041081275,0.00015588806,0.00026467754,0.00013470725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983833,0.001113394,0.000119308505,0.00012840147,0.00017393472,0.00008173494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002539748,0.0003218585,0.00017857361,0.0012356337,0.00470715,0.004455912,0.0004530371,0.0012088254,0.0018384745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038627912,0.00022728292,0.00016147296,0.0007988034,0.018477403,0.0058815842,0.0027840051,0.0024279947,0.0003564991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012666478,0.000005193293,0.00015937636,0.00001892366,0.0000015678356,0.00011477939,0.05219654,0.00006532826,0.0002522955,0.940094,0.0020032441,0.0050761728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013772647,0.00003977957,0.0008901946,0.00019575485,0.000016759177,0.0005425364,0.051304236,0.0006085456,0.0016310161,0.44429392,0.5004326,0.000030886964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004482061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077884546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00470715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003043001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015035629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022078574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092720081","doi":"10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1215","title":"Public Communication and Power: Talking Capitalism, Theory and Critique with John McMurtry","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Ideology; Sociology; Power (physics); Relation (database); Value (mathematics); Neoliberalism (international relations); Liberalism; Social science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05699737965715296,"score_gpt":0.35137961547815766,"score_spread":0.2943822358210047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092720081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076388004,0.022121375,0.0017566157,0.8735832,0.0022276347,0.00004649211,0.00005857357,0.00004857235,0.09251875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60225713,0.028294532,0.004212732,0.2201051,0.0038690032,0.00036636347,0.000067110734,0.00032061842,0.1405075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899588,0.0054744957,0.00015881743,0.0006901208,0.002481228,0.0012365647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98301136,0.012850397,0.0004979697,0.00029704304,0.002012893,0.001330455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010144637,0.0007136743,0.000961374,0.003039911,0.033187326,0.013763094,0.0033984855,0.008690815,0.0068320427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015837451,0.0006720248,0.00039578057,0.005149566,0.049820106,0.013957121,0.0045788316,0.011976142,0.00060331303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019203106,0.000033317352,0.000238059,0.00011140695,0.0000062838317,0.00025565652,0.16935359,0.00020634665,0.00017410675,0.5594388,0.26026145,0.009901816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015267482,0.000010119147,0.00061893696,0.0005394838,0.000006862745,0.00011537295,0.1206357,0.00039681132,0.0001939457,0.08185347,0.7955601,0.00005396011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6451419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6094953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6451419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050942663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043504436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71389586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095766144","doi":"10.22215/etd/2020-14029","title":"Stand-Up Comedy and Social Justice: A Discussion of Freedom of Speech and Inclusive Democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Comedy; Democracy; Oppression; Politeness; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Public sphere; Economic Justice; Media studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Social science; Art; Literature; Politics","score_opus":0.030604531094070412,"score_gpt":0.29915797979076225,"score_spread":0.26855344869669184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095766144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07648518,0.01982686,0.016101385,0.2342802,0.0030175226,0.00008518286,0.000025221027,0.00004278421,0.6501356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437231,0.0040150452,0.0014609573,0.013655647,0.0008697254,0.000109004344,0.00001336086,0.00005052531,0.036102634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99133086,0.0066483556,0.00011791737,0.00036665404,0.0007415578,0.00079464185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932921,0.0056020035,0.00025029364,0.00019041063,0.0002467191,0.00041842848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337525,0.0003751908,0.0005479789,0.0018413013,0.017920902,0.01507701,0.0010098529,0.005082093,0.0043252506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067509986,0.0002136177,0.0005527141,0.0014150565,0.046837483,0.011096366,0.009409442,0.007067164,0.00040928702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057911516,0.000007769738,0.000092357324,0.000027753873,0.0000012008629,0.00009479878,0.037944153,0.00003299609,0.000042026964,0.9568977,0.0022175114,0.0026359516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016619155,0.00006713584,0.0006402897,0.000665148,0.000007092774,0.00025430875,0.0998996,0.00028577266,0.00039312037,0.4597874,0.43795922,0.000024303283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004318902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060289167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017920902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073121763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005160754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053053796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107414365","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering 'Whiteness as Property': Bad Property for Personhood and Affirmative Action Rhetoric","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Rhetoric; Affirmative action; Property (philosophy); Critical legal studies; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Critical race theory; Law; Political science; Race (biology); Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; History; Linguistics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.08057551181221081,"score_gpt":0.2628285142448446,"score_spread":0.1822530024326338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107414365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058853887,0.03134637,0.00901335,0.6161273,0.0061418833,0.000038379134,0.00003700698,0.00006106769,0.27838078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231338,0.0067028357,0.0017125785,0.048342712,0.002853771,0.0000613095,0.000017606657,0.000108955275,0.017066523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897187,0.0072961506,0.00019568508,0.00056316704,0.0015320518,0.0006942688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821409,0.014995229,0.000755976,0.0004450921,0.0012209733,0.00044179728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019061256,0.00051600195,0.00066689134,0.0021669588,0.012603402,0.01676501,0.0015622363,0.0068970937,0.003961619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016927764,0.00031021214,0.00046742047,0.0015162259,0.054110233,0.026055215,0.00642286,0.010909616,0.00049061014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018471113,0.000009358713,0.0001132663,0.00007111038,0.0000041794287,0.00008437314,0.080433115,0.000038418468,0.00011823083,0.90290534,0.010171943,0.00603218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002556988,0.000042888598,0.00062635815,0.0009934319,0.00002569592,0.00015435148,0.12711395,0.00028706033,0.0007976602,0.47548214,0.39441094,0.000039895902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073754336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008572106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019061256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009106466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005425132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10080677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110744462","doi":"10.5204/mcj.2595","title":"The Transmission of Political Critique after 9/11: “A New Form of Desperation”?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"M/C Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Transmission (telecommunications); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Telecommunications; Law","score_opus":0.024801338640112337,"score_gpt":0.26404222071611666,"score_spread":0.23924088207600433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110744462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13998419,0.0053489553,0.008781748,0.34565133,0.005770564,0.00009838853,0.00015354059,0.00028214807,0.49392915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047027,0.0009564137,0.000796273,0.034480244,0.001987764,0.00006627915,0.000055749868,0.0003671081,0.056587525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98747766,0.0075903824,0.00025047344,0.0009744213,0.001977224,0.0017298941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985995,0.006685338,0.0018726308,0.0021182867,0.0022363607,0.0010924438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010026857,0.00048929127,0.00036962557,0.0015118833,0.013921206,0.019728048,0.0015536204,0.008485978,0.009245981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030142574,0.00044251536,0.00047007328,0.0011646516,0.0424883,0.015697496,0.0050435285,0.015663076,0.0021477563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054788026,0.00003673015,0.0015573704,0.00007550048,0.000015081759,0.0012549295,0.43123502,0.000040363266,0.00074513664,0.46031028,0.08746927,0.017205508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023178744,0.000032565637,0.0021886723,0.00043766038,0.000012834634,0.0008642353,0.21020204,0.00013213167,0.0012055775,0.050602004,0.73423654,0.00006261801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008999885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008637406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019728048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068359394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038102507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05302775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110895158","doi":"10.1177/0020715220983391","title":"The memories of others: How leaders import collective memories in political speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective memory; Politics; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Repertoire; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; History; Law; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.1730714437119896,"score_gpt":0.36868235672991434,"score_spread":0.19561091301792474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110895158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9485338,0.0012337625,0.0021792816,0.0022831205,0.00009169616,0.000022567516,0.00005388997,0.000022110557,0.045579683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982632,0.00019939145,0.00021967411,0.00009259793,0.00002197247,0.000008662159,0.000013799545,0.000014169185,0.0011664617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714845,0.0019020701,0.00009784092,0.00021980035,0.0002636681,0.00036825397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942926,0.0037814416,0.000772969,0.000544411,0.0002953595,0.00031319621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034217397,0.00031050746,0.00031028377,0.0014822793,0.0054982523,0.008229638,0.00078508555,0.0011410367,0.0038339878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011597307,0.00032193123,0.0002549561,0.0012531226,0.011752489,0.009033921,0.006446383,0.0018178385,0.0003368908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057427,0.000013557459,0.003704405,0.00008833621,0.000010218083,0.0005150849,0.97078615,0.00003181814,0.0007911923,0.014991556,0.0003742483,0.00863596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009837759,0.000042505097,0.006537044,0.00020901639,0.000022198547,0.00048661674,0.9660099,0.000080786056,0.0006623815,0.005842537,0.020073622,0.000023590444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002299246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047028963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008229638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013893096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010577085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01809609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120072854","doi":"","title":"Bob Dylan, Charles Taylor, and Cultural Disintegration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Emptiness; Sociology; Individualism; Pessimism; Aesthetics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020863090668095833,"score_gpt":0.24860240267229097,"score_spread":0.22773931200419514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120072854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03439639,0.099072374,0.0013668013,0.60156476,0.002627931,0.00002644587,0.000040918974,0.000035889563,0.26086852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8241983,0.047087908,0.0012352583,0.057081666,0.0013618108,0.00008497676,0.000036396395,0.00015063718,0.06876304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960349,0.002410664,0.000076849,0.0002824698,0.00070261356,0.00049253926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714464,0.0013060874,0.00026111447,0.00013079919,0.0005639502,0.0005933758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031551097,0.00031446374,0.0004362456,0.0012652503,0.020779187,0.007766424,0.0010500157,0.0029617795,0.0035989848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004767026,0.0002920676,0.00016650363,0.0015934805,0.034967635,0.008224091,0.0046083606,0.0070409523,0.000619453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020033021,0.00002042163,0.00046937467,0.000084277286,0.0000041885905,0.00026524527,0.15116227,0.00007020308,0.00011461885,0.7142999,0.11833044,0.015159045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007011126,0.000011167756,0.00074672216,0.0003898668,0.00000446733,0.0002719724,0.101786435,0.00006837219,0.00013872443,0.11930719,0.7772422,0.00002594408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09422719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099391975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09422719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017689656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009718177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18735749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121139040","doi":"10.22455/2541-7894-2020-9-195-207","title":"The Origins of the Kenneth Burke Society","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literature of the Americas","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Outreach; Sociology; Media studies; History; Art history; Classics; Literature; Law; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02851459590769153,"score_gpt":0.23710135392888054,"score_spread":0.208586758021189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121139040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02856474,0.06497807,0.0050924765,0.27222815,0.0069539715,0.00009361036,0.00009081035,0.00014967013,0.62184846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5059432,0.021700487,0.005190196,0.04967754,0.002868463,0.0001993438,0.00007269416,0.00034144757,0.41400668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99059933,0.004752786,0.00027935125,0.0013523508,0.0017771868,0.0012389288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921433,0.0030450698,0.0004968101,0.0005557108,0.0012162538,0.0025429144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069239275,0.00053351023,0.00065600104,0.0022430643,0.017493749,0.014200829,0.0012300061,0.0065283114,0.011181468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015554334,0.00059979246,0.00029555362,0.0015097815,0.029255537,0.008940599,0.01018264,0.010120805,0.0032057927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020780231,0.000032786655,0.0002963128,0.0000501198,0.000004824594,0.0002721929,0.016296864,0.00004188377,0.00022713892,0.8876035,0.0753842,0.019769376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000452077,0.000010411269,0.0003072261,0.00016337441,0.000001360162,0.00009814732,0.0022708394,0.00004056624,0.00010158011,0.050864607,0.9461178,0.000019480161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016617699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022426564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017493749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010564765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010548717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07665306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121716778","doi":"","title":"Equality Kapped; Media Unleashed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.515375109847134,"score_gpt":0.5724493785281322,"score_spread":0.057074268680998186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121716778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029113764,0.016647855,0.0030303183,0.20588455,0.004268755,0.000037298403,0.0004233585,0.00012779851,0.7404663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80332094,0.012193056,0.0013078981,0.06804373,0.0032481062,0.00005279134,0.00024549777,0.00020293368,0.11138507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367964,0.0016453237,0.00014419299,0.00057578157,0.0028018304,0.0011531946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929554,0.0038948075,0.0004709999,0.00047726504,0.0015243967,0.0006772687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034262256,0.0004862109,0.0004112849,0.0031369852,0.017367134,0.022645874,0.0013949104,0.0045786668,0.017632648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010808146,0.00041298682,0.00035159793,0.0034381694,0.02097853,0.013328201,0.008610602,0.0098745525,0.0011666334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045093315,0.000021918873,0.001629682,0.00021469244,0.0000117300015,0.0006603489,0.09376608,0.00010211276,0.00039501165,0.75820196,0.086434305,0.058516942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054171874,0.000009770775,0.0014488931,0.0005658503,0.000013105877,0.00015501893,0.04534625,0.00007528114,0.0004731518,0.026396088,0.92548317,0.000027946859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3637493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4213356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3637493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029763302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023674058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7232641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121742180","doi":"10.5070/t8112049585","title":"Indigenous Antinuclear Literary Resistance: Jim Northrup’s Satire and Anishinaabe Trans/nationalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transnational American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Indigenous; Nationalism; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Resistance (ecology); Political science; History; Politics; Law; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05516785526569108,"score_gpt":0.2773113959036217,"score_spread":0.22214354063793063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121742180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16919224,0.025592288,0.00089128077,0.17024194,0.0076798154,0.000025792497,0.000041107556,0.00009529506,0.62624013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83573616,0.0051223044,0.000367052,0.013845847,0.0021069683,0.00002563839,0.000022154474,0.00014368857,0.14263028],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826056,0.0007590719,0.000040965355,0.000186825,0.0004001214,0.0003525243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984333,0.000721038,0.00015989812,0.000114839946,0.00028242855,0.0002884965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018173478,0.00039717447,0.00027348794,0.00088487193,0.015064873,0.007275788,0.0006996821,0.0018653639,0.0059007215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00293569,0.00020033374,0.00015402639,0.00070774317,0.01336215,0.004395526,0.0042068795,0.0054487656,0.00078262476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006078696,0.000042325963,0.0008715975,0.0001401517,0.000011606463,0.0008710856,0.6357687,0.000043922722,0.00091278984,0.24496576,0.09550683,0.02080452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000624471,0.000015024879,0.0016811469,0.00020728113,0.0000068016993,0.00039682668,0.15226611,0.000054432567,0.00033253708,0.005392092,0.8396229,0.000018576033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014332717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041845027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015064873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050076344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002255747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036333144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124209385","doi":"10.22455/2541-7894-2020-9-60-80","title":"Reading the Signs with Kenneth Burke","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literature of the Americas","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Action (physics); Ideology; Reading (process); Representation (politics); Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; The Symbolic; Power (physics); Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Politics","score_opus":0.030961345343338872,"score_gpt":0.22731640394108996,"score_spread":0.1963550585977511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124209385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042678304,0.0505063,0.005176298,0.8157094,0.021980962,0.00002369041,0.00004706582,0.00018871916,0.10209974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29912323,0.05087082,0.013677586,0.25310192,0.021184491,0.00026065807,0.000099535784,0.0007259585,0.36095577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446374,0.0032439467,0.00014706838,0.00057528104,0.0013317671,0.00023809641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927003,0.003870145,0.00045756687,0.0005248344,0.0014618259,0.0009853153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033922573,0.0005047079,0.0007178827,0.0015209573,0.0077628577,0.0101038935,0.00093171006,0.0047887405,0.0072908443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019077633,0.00042970382,0.0002580635,0.000999475,0.01635831,0.012779637,0.005221956,0.014932644,0.0043142354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003179555,0.000043028693,0.00026920135,0.00012476355,0.000010363359,0.00037839168,0.016204678,0.00011520864,0.0003647247,0.32777587,0.6243878,0.030294165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056491645,0.000017822385,0.0001113417,0.00042822788,0.00000337826,0.00020199388,0.0053624725,0.00010984761,0.0001997059,0.07023637,0.9233054,0.000017845688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063978527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009637187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0101038935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030254535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003295325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02439028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125304394","doi":"","title":"Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Deliberation; Dimension (graph theory); Normative; Interdependence; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Social science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04175377799421306,"score_gpt":0.2648353734704606,"score_spread":0.22308159547624754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125304394","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047480732,0.0074331253,0.7385388,0.014056981,0.00050761027,0.00014103815,0.000263033,0.00046412612,0.19111446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8214698,0.0021801598,0.16230279,0.00072088814,0.00036910316,0.000291733,0.0002891587,0.00014257524,0.012233758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938645,0.0037364773,0.0003475338,0.00082199957,0.00096831756,0.00026115854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868571,0.010487105,0.0004120959,0.0015862171,0.0004811013,0.00017630367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006245848,0.000477638,0.00088624266,0.0027298282,0.002311169,0.00789396,0.0017830346,0.0023501944,0.0065573286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018836778,0.0004474118,0.0011760718,0.0019653898,0.016954264,0.012701689,0.005242909,0.0026658336,0.0007907901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004456689,0.000003790388,0.0000668438,0.000040258128,0.0000054159823,0.00001830331,0.0004183928,0.0013415095,0.000040845294,0.9942181,0.00023251394,0.0036095863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057657267,0.000002423015,0.000026495443,0.000022150654,0.0000030737876,0.000023729104,0.00009684682,0.0040779053,0.00009810269,0.9888459,0.0067940564,0.000003606149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091123703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070641097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00789396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002882007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016084657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033031642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126346939","doi":"10.1177/1363459320988886","title":"The piety of optimization: The rhetoric of health awareness in ParticipACTION and Fitbit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Piety; Rhetoric; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Public relations; Power (physics); Public health; Corporation; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Nursing; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14911584484169663,"score_gpt":0.45577882621200755,"score_spread":0.3066629813703109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126346939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22947308,0.009717419,0.07437613,0.1448023,0.002420285,0.00018157445,0.00008600604,0.00030786017,0.5386353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831783,0.0008193577,0.003985464,0.0038793958,0.00034782672,0.00012263548,0.000019376695,0.0001108677,0.0075367102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97436935,0.021785988,0.0003476885,0.0007972324,0.001920234,0.0007795016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9287299,0.06507202,0.0019980818,0.0021655327,0.0012703841,0.0007640586],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022817167,0.00068900455,0.0006148155,0.0043715085,0.014080842,0.015896661,0.0012697914,0.0052674715,0.003884386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03475831,0.0004939549,0.00047704144,0.0028253428,0.058340162,0.022168461,0.010081669,0.0072918553,0.0004873168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043293094,0.000027768681,0.0004648652,0.00011691164,0.000006515846,0.00018694223,0.2875516,0.00008852061,0.00024593878,0.701289,0.0025655923,0.0074130725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005036573,0.00012520001,0.0013010035,0.0011730944,0.000034917808,0.00074031804,0.30268672,0.0013304849,0.0019951176,0.3562672,0.3342127,0.000082941464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001894374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014822121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047294265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025847626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12067014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126550253","doi":"10.1177/1750635221991598","title":"Book review: Kris Fallon, <i>Where Truth Lies: Digital Culture and Documentary Media after 9/11</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Media War & Conflict","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Digital culture; Art; Art history; Visual arts; Literature; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.016834000442220495,"score_gpt":0.23216562811106478,"score_spread":0.21533162766884428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126550253","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011510862,0.64288557,0.0002658589,0.20739263,0.11988361,0.00007465072,0.0006227138,0.000118682845,0.028641233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002003387,0.48659128,0.00038237753,0.21168537,0.07927229,0.0002220655,0.0009797266,0.00019167576,0.21867175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983962,0.0002086746,0.000088181274,0.00020368442,0.000986333,0.000116879935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931632,0.0024028567,0.00045770907,0.00014554428,0.0032382389,0.0005924616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017667271,0.0011506972,0.002098665,0.00493336,0.0016969573,0.0049693133,0.0028194364,0.0070767235,0.047208734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009464648,0.0007047888,0.00073130365,0.006426601,0.0017785176,0.003917331,0.002067415,0.0063156867,0.04030403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034041627,0.0000017655899,0.000007266225,0.00020816537,0.0000015894575,0.000005810879,0.0000115610965,0.0000076615515,0.000011024756,0.00019281915,0.9917013,0.007847767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007336284,0.000005949132,0.0001072231,0.00065093144,0.000007924498,0.000052017705,0.00004697629,0.000010004281,0.000024489684,0.0002998615,0.9987796,0.00000753164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022412332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05946536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047208734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004878525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075431913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15792894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134916936","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2021.1.10230","title":"What Am I, a Piece of Meat? Synecdochical Utterances Targeting Women","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Perspective (graphical); Statement (logic); Stern; Daughter; Subject (documents); Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Art; Visual arts; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03299741856594434,"score_gpt":0.25025522496846525,"score_spread":0.2172578064025209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134916936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54236126,0.0131597705,0.026762018,0.13822578,0.0045461017,0.00031906384,0.00065503496,0.00030268452,0.27366823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633561,0.0022358529,0.002660965,0.005520306,0.0005897411,0.00020560903,0.000102536374,0.00015088971,0.025177917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089867,0.007492481,0.00014920926,0.00037129983,0.00063308585,0.00045539963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184626,0.006344822,0.00052952534,0.00018878379,0.0007555965,0.00033509012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005304614,0.0011628838,0.00046244884,0.0013082618,0.011548163,0.0044140215,0.0009570659,0.003446089,0.0041882177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013249615,0.00048349708,0.0003352421,0.0013017519,0.010334437,0.0052816197,0.004977126,0.004977676,0.00090398244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006534141,0.0000094838315,0.00050146034,0.00013760463,0.000006561332,0.0010426547,0.9511229,0.000043353015,0.0013919666,0.02989215,0.0115239555,0.004262604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055959645,0.000027735145,0.00059436634,0.00029865405,0.000007321115,0.0006431402,0.8380715,0.00010403293,0.000831693,0.0027719873,0.15662384,0.000020157495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070241205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0146906525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011548163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004168627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011984714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030245662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135151384","doi":"10.1177/1750698021995932","title":"Claiming Martin Luther King, Jr. for the right: The Martin Luther King Day holiday in the Reagan era","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Victory; Appropriation; Reinterpretation; Opposition (politics); Politics; Law; Sociology; Affirmative action; White (mutation); Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10982770824316157,"score_gpt":0.31237846721280893,"score_spread":0.20255075896964736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135151384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42353213,0.0132995965,0.0012797606,0.11478054,0.0018095621,0.000014080616,0.00005192114,0.000064603715,0.44516778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654597,0.0016827342,0.00010634406,0.0039467346,0.0003037697,0.0000044728176,0.000008496429,0.00003503198,0.028452702],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854517,0.00078045565,0.000021082453,0.00012541199,0.00021459562,0.0003132626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981342,0.0012264322,0.00020242124,0.000117246316,0.00012596845,0.00019369253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024312378,0.00024507023,0.00022835683,0.0009612624,0.0148407025,0.008549935,0.0006082646,0.0019549578,0.0048286105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046015144,0.00020242241,0.00013559252,0.0008333789,0.01823875,0.0054395976,0.003217547,0.004397004,0.00059420546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007211231,0.00003729033,0.0011913627,0.00007735761,0.000008090908,0.00066691113,0.55690455,0.00004960547,0.0005442874,0.3896257,0.029911993,0.020910759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001202455,0.000039499544,0.0023513848,0.00033085843,0.000018145935,0.00034355867,0.44969276,0.00008099603,0.0010422819,0.029363245,0.5166966,0.000028647955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026460843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057261504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026460843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053374204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020083112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052613676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154400068","doi":"10.1080/19376529.2021.1905927","title":"Gender, Media and Voice: Communicative Injustice in Public Speech","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Radio & Audio Media","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Linguistics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1053192771592424,"score_gpt":0.2847194683163421,"score_spread":0.1794001911570997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154400068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.544684,0.011576506,0.0029897492,0.11074944,0.0009165465,0.000020735099,0.00010906739,0.00004881942,0.32890517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99190897,0.0007860455,0.00010566167,0.0014114466,0.0002198806,0.00001041583,0.000006604069,0.000019419973,0.0055314833],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946538,0.004176244,0.00010473534,0.00024535597,0.00045685915,0.000363067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98569804,0.011896909,0.0012998703,0.0003533254,0.0004013507,0.0003504481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005186002,0.0002967847,0.00025722143,0.0012127409,0.0066450713,0.011561932,0.0006870882,0.0033582458,0.0061495374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014282618,0.00021789482,0.00024450588,0.0011359726,0.02134829,0.00666346,0.0039607272,0.0033981767,0.00060756435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013043123,0.000051718293,0.009013184,0.0001437247,0.000017907762,0.0007057356,0.6253441,0.00008798644,0.00055869715,0.33434245,0.0075217863,0.022082277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033604836,0.00014424886,0.025301334,0.00075470586,0.00005220423,0.001182513,0.72563344,0.0006227134,0.0016434469,0.12830769,0.11625381,0.00007027072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006500813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080839135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011561932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003274616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018112279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02742654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156684974","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-6732-6.ch012","title":"Writing in Times of Crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in linguistics and communication studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Autoethnography; Persuasion; Rhetorical question; Realism; Aesthetics; Injustice; Sociology; Memoir; Literature; Resistance (ecology); Media studies; Art; Political science; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07072067421639809,"score_gpt":0.3334002330260147,"score_spread":0.2626795588096166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156684974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24712326,0.025080247,0.004214103,0.048134048,0.005032743,0.00013934386,0.000100292804,0.0001848402,0.66999114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84918654,0.012027266,0.002426171,0.004824456,0.0011503317,0.000115568335,0.00008594184,0.0002148133,0.12996887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846196,0.00092074805,0.000056555353,0.0001442991,0.00023256811,0.00018383394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793494,0.0010940912,0.00020096835,0.00016082912,0.00020252525,0.0004067217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002149164,0.0005365438,0.00041572336,0.0012788317,0.007828657,0.0083806,0.0008118331,0.0019562962,0.005797459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004681371,0.00026508392,0.00018303224,0.0012369037,0.009374604,0.006690461,0.004288216,0.0031924755,0.0010185151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005270227,0.000052331703,0.00090966193,0.00044281108,0.000008512962,0.0025313366,0.7637819,0.00015194004,0.0015363719,0.15484248,0.03192578,0.04376427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073483047,0.00003859055,0.0011122912,0.0006481549,0.00000434217,0.0017021749,0.31744304,0.00012300446,0.0003981443,0.019610649,0.65889996,0.00001224592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015522187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029812383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002558532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023026986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019394398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157963792","doi":"10.7202/1076915ar","title":"A Small Story Concerning a Big Mistake: Returning Voice to a Breast Cancer Narrative","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Narrative Works","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Storytelling; Performative utterance; Utterance; Mistake; Redress; Aesthetics; History; Literature; Art; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.09643801493004578,"score_gpt":0.28305695558101934,"score_spread":0.18661894065097356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157963792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.411207,0.015998384,0.01267251,0.43680656,0.016416064,0.00019862263,0.00027931936,0.00038032501,0.10604124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102876,0.004488566,0.0036087455,0.032861643,0.0026289462,0.00010736317,0.00011407419,0.00029098126,0.045612033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377394,0.004717223,0.0001319227,0.00030778642,0.00061255955,0.0004564907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910234,0.006356112,0.00058917695,0.00025906967,0.0005960026,0.0011762673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041945726,0.0007401722,0.00053732324,0.0010401763,0.019547284,0.006635708,0.0019224315,0.0066605154,0.003435514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021349438,0.00038099248,0.0005469243,0.0008349391,0.013450206,0.007160755,0.0055836653,0.011090553,0.000989551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009178106,0.000039164624,0.0010613198,0.00013293253,0.000013658649,0.00887197,0.88398606,0.00010917715,0.000652236,0.030148877,0.06308825,0.011804573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008626849,0.000093752984,0.00076595653,0.00042998814,0.000014286089,0.009094845,0.6495815,0.0002958816,0.0008243483,0.0045653554,0.33428422,0.000041296087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053166114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012602578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019547284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032893426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001919454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023865938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158071982","doi":"10.22215/etd/2019-13679","title":"Navigating Conservatism in Trump's America: How the Penn State College Republicans Construct and Perform Political Discourses and Realities on Campus","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Performative utterance; Politics; Conservatism; State (computer science); Presidency; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Media studies; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03136411023512032,"score_gpt":0.2869674505654162,"score_spread":0.2556033403302959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158071982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97581226,0.0000930049,0.000444004,0.002635541,0.000019158522,0.000010659459,0.000007534492,0.000007980065,0.020969814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955289,0.00007777713,0.0001405063,0.00031382678,0.00000851751,0.000010965712,0.0000068987424,0.0000124764,0.0039002087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696857,0.0021387036,0.000045157703,0.00018686225,0.0002777373,0.00038296144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976247,0.001484233,0.00032445334,0.00011261858,0.00015070994,0.0003033319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025544176,0.00024494174,0.00030644314,0.0011186539,0.01362338,0.008947409,0.00069002406,0.0011484514,0.0032001096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004137067,0.00025736788,0.00012221759,0.001115494,0.014931303,0.004303311,0.005163137,0.0038552026,0.00030452968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007631221,0.000036800593,0.0035140214,0.0000076027964,0.0000012780737,0.00012944089,0.9837472,0.000017370774,0.00041012198,0.0076897065,0.00075673626,0.0036820325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019526378,0.0000136137405,0.003574034,0.000022390448,0.0000016708312,0.00006581013,0.9775924,0.00007936362,0.00021500744,0.0010511591,0.017374752,0.000007811945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019862317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046686415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019862317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003597446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028982342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03949344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158587063","doi":"10.1111/cars.12335","title":"Racial stereotyping of indigenous people in the Canadian media: A comparative analysis of two water pollution incidents","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mainstream; Newspaper; Globe; Government (linguistics); White (mutation); Colonialism; Tragedy (event); Criminology; Political science; Media studies; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; History; Geography; Law; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.11235595248257249,"score_gpt":0.31263495145978365,"score_spread":0.20027899897721116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158587063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97116417,0.0021369064,0.000119891185,0.0013936292,0.00008808544,0.000046421934,0.0003387401,0.000011177447,0.024700927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931687,0.0028472603,0.0001762297,0.00045074633,0.00006685532,0.000026654754,0.00019286244,0.000021515596,0.0030491636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956399,0.00093453634,0.0001409672,0.0003071563,0.00192542,0.0010520109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911169,0.0033470741,0.001439,0.00028597386,0.003073527,0.0007375388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003122348,0.0006793675,0.00053512596,0.016017854,0.015633168,0.006383268,0.0013439512,0.0012327824,0.0037414106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01172435,0.0004065252,0.000261142,0.013207812,0.008324942,0.0019687328,0.0041496097,0.0013276057,0.00024216033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056797177,0.000025484398,0.025415372,0.00019031104,0.000017172317,0.0007338873,0.95967317,0.000011286728,0.0009839232,0.0008940812,0.001028672,0.010969874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027996377,0.000021707177,0.10002012,0.0001654099,0.000031949414,0.000287994,0.87912333,0.000031854917,0.00036275818,0.000075598124,0.019845797,0.000030695403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9444926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05550742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024677606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023657884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17904937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158647889","doi":"10.1080/08865655.2021.1918570","title":"The Eagle, the Condor, and Exodus: New Directions in Political Theater and Border Spectacle","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Borderlands Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eagle; Spectacle; Narrative; Politics; Key (lock); Malleability; Political science; Pipeline (software); Work (physics); Political economy; History; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer security; Computer science; Art; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.04946635594345236,"score_gpt":0.31782146407224554,"score_spread":0.26835510812879315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158647889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4963005,0.021817653,0.015389006,0.06456146,0.0015496498,0.000054425553,0.00006892052,0.00010069304,0.40015772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905275,0.0014953607,0.0008224547,0.0007810775,0.00020877674,0.000018832225,0.000009308475,0.000045886663,0.0060907668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969518,0.002254078,0.000060911465,0.00023385092,0.00023990689,0.0002593611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928266,0.0058981404,0.00034990342,0.00048596654,0.00019657289,0.00024290834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005428807,0.0004761953,0.00036214598,0.0019465652,0.010837366,0.012452502,0.0008895365,0.0025158452,0.0052435976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066610677,0.00030215475,0.0002124372,0.001746772,0.035974853,0.01630897,0.0067498507,0.0042596543,0.00033217994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007057944,0.000023283306,0.0009689603,0.00014695825,0.0000054284787,0.0003669641,0.42648044,0.00006665708,0.00057944295,0.55452514,0.0023941663,0.014371953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027786135,0.00007049304,0.0021694747,0.0008332066,0.000020960439,0.0006217203,0.625181,0.00046021296,0.0014591385,0.081869535,0.28725287,0.000033582866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022054508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005163908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012452502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040712473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012382553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029539108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159575630","doi":"10.14288/1.0396990","title":"Recontextualizing the “silence” of Japanese Canadians : artistic approaches by Cindy Mochizuki and Emma Nishimura","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Gender studies; Sociology; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.035827282263501035,"score_gpt":0.16944424878499098,"score_spread":0.13361696652148994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159575630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6986672,0.021666953,0.00503951,0.05564637,0.0029221405,0.00025247064,0.0001438587,0.00017003091,0.2154914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537484,0.006818443,0.0029040643,0.003548153,0.0002672405,0.00010392873,0.0000575869,0.00011925502,0.032433096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976876,0.00079559954,0.000049128197,0.0002811868,0.00051750924,0.0006690582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997311,0.0007157208,0.00013758335,0.00015452427,0.00081379776,0.0008674563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035648611,0.0010438976,0.00051510317,0.0020461075,0.043792974,0.008126623,0.0023433517,0.0018096725,0.0026186334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003004723,0.00046743828,0.0004988789,0.0016240329,0.024995008,0.0024842895,0.0058447467,0.0043537254,0.00031809718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044914777,0.00002477262,0.0018251576,0.00016057641,0.000013844657,0.0007468027,0.9507509,0.00009082974,0.0021727656,0.012198501,0.014877557,0.017093467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010450221,0.000030206036,0.0042533767,0.00023950069,0.000040517243,0.00038447225,0.81043196,0.00014725073,0.0007197932,0.0011144778,0.18256186,0.000066144756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7325527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9018711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2674473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027865328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030967034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5380447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159602815","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.8319","title":"Naming and Indication in The One Secret That Has Carried","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Poetry; Reflexive pronoun; Reading (process); Theme (computing); Literature; Self; Philosophy; Aesthetics; History; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Art; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.35404762074857016,"score_gpt":0.3648793895901807,"score_spread":0.010831768841610523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159602815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26279408,0.0047900053,0.044429325,0.024746671,0.0025197514,0.00006547229,0.000038849987,0.00019741847,0.6604184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802223,0.0004493394,0.0020341233,0.0006021614,0.00011750354,0.000015503761,0.000008144927,0.000059673304,0.01649131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950145,0.0035041594,0.00012616941,0.00032129747,0.00076759176,0.0002663388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995752,0.0028782822,0.00037038888,0.0004443232,0.0003707734,0.00018421024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005101694,0.00034281317,0.0002956931,0.0009940095,0.007125854,0.0051545077,0.0005567635,0.0015121044,0.0019201018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008378646,0.00019308315,0.00029187134,0.000667325,0.044228848,0.008232678,0.0036228334,0.0031892434,0.0003246642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021193051,0.000005341926,0.00025340889,0.000028470351,0.0000016953171,0.00014280455,0.117839664,0.00003372919,0.00050232315,0.8763083,0.0010590854,0.0038038637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023593208,0.00015459654,0.0010815375,0.00029184876,0.000025007957,0.0011475374,0.14595123,0.00060458254,0.0036721546,0.40499058,0.44199407,0.000063238185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014857562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016177023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007125854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021044973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018355253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026980639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165878669","doi":"","title":"Review of William Pinar, Moving Images of Eternity: George Grant’s Critique of Time, Teaching, and Technology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Elite; Politics; Eternity; Lament; Sociology; Classics; Political science; Media studies; History; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011369010102330846,"score_gpt":0.23368551290174913,"score_spread":0.22231650279941828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165878669","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016221403,0.8393305,0.0001405016,0.14067894,0.01061011,0.0000052008186,0.00006217472,0.000005969385,0.009004357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006225199,0.9040056,0.00018023478,0.060324416,0.01777691,0.00002076026,0.00008656241,0.00003662526,0.011343614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977552,0.00066784985,0.00014561925,0.0002392974,0.0010400823,0.00015199416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881295,0.0063096504,0.0004063197,0.00021064295,0.0044401665,0.0005038313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033275443,0.0006619053,0.0013221174,0.0042445045,0.0026051472,0.0051590875,0.0019795387,0.0045238337,0.0058974726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014042036,0.00048363995,0.00030113698,0.0073963455,0.009571958,0.0068216934,0.0019276049,0.0068064714,0.0030931262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000079771535,0.0000056437166,0.000073554365,0.00080920575,0.0000071870318,0.000035957237,0.0010196063,0.000043821994,0.000026223817,0.023995852,0.94694257,0.027032318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022209338,0.000001901318,0.00024596442,0.0014305053,0.0000037454836,0.00005302523,0.0004691509,0.0000075118387,0.000011193514,0.0017517712,0.9960169,0.0000059971726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10049903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16075726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10049903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01083062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014030112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19982815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172482163","doi":"10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v44i1.13342","title":"What are they saying? A speech act analysis of a vaccination information debate on Facebook","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alabama","keywords":"Criticism; Speech act; Vaccination; Pandemic; Free speech; Public relations; Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine; Law; Virology","score_opus":0.02056376430977933,"score_gpt":0.21854731958806808,"score_spread":0.19798355527828876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172482163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589864,0.000476217,0.0044216258,0.004158087,0.00014838457,0.00019540254,0.00047667927,0.000059797076,0.031077445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887938,0.0003309999,0.0029055956,0.0004079834,0.00007127014,0.00016504232,0.00035665056,0.00007102181,0.006897545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878735,0.008808339,0.00030966048,0.0004281632,0.0012065173,0.00045992588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.929491,0.06398046,0.0023521974,0.0010831469,0.0023584687,0.0007347522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008008902,0.0004935302,0.00047134957,0.0031854196,0.006597555,0.006515242,0.000806003,0.002153833,0.0033906875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031712107,0.00030068515,0.00026313594,0.002670804,0.006085907,0.005472798,0.0029906812,0.0023689668,0.0008730132],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014356017,0.000044762084,0.0038993456,0.00013824188,0.000006509538,0.00067344646,0.9743756,0.00009180135,0.0017243238,0.0073985253,0.0013285956,0.010175302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001268687,0.000064270054,0.0116666965,0.00028312343,0.000017675582,0.00030879534,0.9278636,0.0016802149,0.0020657044,0.0037883627,0.052195396,0.000053498195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007191401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008989157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008008902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035824191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001669518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042355597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174132882","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2021v46n2a3783","title":"Acoustic Infrastructure: The Sounds and Politics of Radio Tests in American Emergency Broadcasting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Context (archaeology); Publics; Temporality; Politics; Telecommunications; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028500226700812745,"score_gpt":0.25251307201169,"score_spread":0.22401284531087723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174132882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10558207,0.0044698026,0.012318761,0.064473055,0.0012936195,0.00007068808,0.000052788455,0.000109683046,0.8116296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98374915,0.0007888247,0.0007462078,0.002217988,0.00035413966,0.00003076245,0.00001109752,0.000041063075,0.012060721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968893,0.0016527402,0.00006044178,0.00027151077,0.00080129836,0.00032465043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917753,0.006124048,0.00047837305,0.0002474573,0.0011013431,0.00027359172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039507826,0.00029086325,0.00016973593,0.0022033972,0.010645437,0.008578762,0.0008389513,0.0029787929,0.005249468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010236136,0.00033983935,0.00015792671,0.0015346309,0.029246554,0.0044584787,0.002733312,0.0041228854,0.00052691484],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003631189,0.000019697014,0.00090807525,0.000067397814,0.0000035885405,0.00025635117,0.113240115,0.00020386257,0.0005800087,0.858249,0.0074809548,0.01895453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033329714,0.00011343948,0.007361187,0.00074008806,0.0000449453,0.00040211037,0.23223971,0.0011955058,0.0016985693,0.15550224,0.60058814,0.00008066164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03180421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032714628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03180421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009210884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005493738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06682998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183294149","doi":"","title":"Trump vs. Clinton: Implicatures as public stance acts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0474293286877306,"score_gpt":0.19871736639225349,"score_spread":0.15128803770452287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183294149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040248208,0.0042156423,0.02208331,0.029971685,0.00092142884,0.00010578049,0.000058436093,0.00016769186,0.9022279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94799244,0.0014888055,0.004459775,0.0023010205,0.00038363656,0.00016443882,0.000040611743,0.00025129082,0.04291792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98841196,0.008464318,0.00024640793,0.00069415866,0.0015428816,0.00064032926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485327,0.012120498,0.0008938378,0.0009364133,0.0008865791,0.0003094012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008488312,0.00072753924,0.0005820858,0.0029295622,0.008945869,0.017168347,0.0019311035,0.0063351113,0.0052617905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025516864,0.0007683742,0.000453507,0.0026388702,0.044365823,0.021561977,0.007026968,0.008154675,0.0010340391],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012376996,0.0000060261727,0.00010534984,0.000037013557,0.0000024281899,0.00009165636,0.079269685,0.000038711198,0.00010342388,0.91458786,0.0022673616,0.003478132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003890873,0.000054846354,0.00091168564,0.000757608,0.00003434378,0.00046396125,0.13648166,0.0013396771,0.0010189374,0.5970984,0.26175135,0.00004860239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057109706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004311176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017168347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074135535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024921729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053789318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184632284","doi":"10.7939/r3-xnf2-9y08","title":"Residents’ perception of hydraulic fracturing and their engagement in hydraulic fracturing in Lethbridge, Fox Creek, and Rosebud, Alberta, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hydraulic fracturing; Geology; Mining engineering; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.02023304498218805,"score_gpt":0.1787601166399927,"score_spread":0.15852707165780464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184632284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98199433,0.0004899745,0.00006615735,0.0062749493,0.000057554967,0.000027200034,0.00015751972,0.000009166579,0.010923149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391454,0.00048822176,0.00007486592,0.0012175632,0.0000132419955,0.000013129701,0.000097757424,0.000006900587,0.0041737687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985189,0.00022221195,0.000030972747,0.00008897599,0.0004470486,0.000691941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653625,0.00031388502,0.0003019711,0.000034217595,0.00074659847,0.0020670576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010784741,0.00025342684,0.0002818432,0.00077127997,0.011760783,0.0031214475,0.0014391546,0.0009278264,0.0064115445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025795898,0.0002682224,0.00030144694,0.001325699,0.005531381,0.00097259297,0.002349308,0.0020959775,0.0003437659],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020581092,0.00027929354,0.42376706,0.00017111881,0.000040397077,0.0018531182,0.5121843,0.00030206813,0.0011295564,0.0028721164,0.028220257,0.02897485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073531237,0.000058333797,0.20717944,0.00015099111,0.00001068028,0.00015552682,0.7772187,0.000155662,0.00006277394,0.00015854245,0.014792188,0.000049836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98356485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99401915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027171154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027171154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033713873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19714141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184781918","doi":"10.4000/ces.5279","title":"“Let Us Give New Names to the Stars”: F. R. Scott, Dorothy Livesay, and the Power of Poetry to Move beyond Labels","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Essays and Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Argument (complex analysis); Feeling; Power (physics); Criticism; Expression (computer science); Aesthetics; Period (music); Sociology; Epistemology; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.04344140490816767,"score_gpt":0.2830591555399176,"score_spread":0.23961775063174995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184781918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017368734,0.0939278,0.0037266049,0.7579984,0.009901215,0.000026847125,0.000047688733,0.00009180224,0.11691088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.733528,0.04574883,0.0045417766,0.06967685,0.0069016325,0.00007060629,0.000052954238,0.00025451047,0.13922486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756503,0.0014427738,0.000048217556,0.00017155592,0.0006326306,0.00013978717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943011,0.0033886847,0.00036403604,0.00019956853,0.0013366957,0.0004100269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048435633,0.00053574145,0.00035215047,0.001227978,0.0092076,0.0053485427,0.00087873585,0.0022814362,0.0022026175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011650123,0.00022979836,0.00019868936,0.0010099846,0.024668153,0.006722193,0.0015905784,0.0045611574,0.00071109616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053454176,0.000026798052,0.0004602107,0.0001826492,0.0000103429265,0.0003041582,0.108231224,0.00010819574,0.0004197197,0.31932378,0.53723055,0.033648953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001016964,0.000023281225,0.0008166815,0.0004229286,0.000008296863,0.000283529,0.04144655,0.00014428914,0.00047693384,0.035002455,0.9213307,0.00003411837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067002326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11204701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9329977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004520921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038489918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13322467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186154410","doi":"10.82308/54657","title":"\"Pigs ate my roses\": Media moralities, comedic inversions, and the first amendment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"First amendment; Advertising; Law; Political science; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.044410730529504484,"score_gpt":0.22753965561098083,"score_spread":0.18312892508147635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186154410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12924255,0.003389477,0.0038975584,0.02614802,0.00047438685,0.000038612845,0.000040723713,0.000039010705,0.83672965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785539,0.0005122871,0.00035540632,0.0016159477,0.0001290686,0.000029976041,0.000009202217,0.000016153566,0.01877804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99279237,0.005219084,0.00009831103,0.00039010128,0.0007004594,0.0007996482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509215,0.0028931112,0.00072167726,0.0004224797,0.0005020268,0.00036847894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058842897,0.00031998055,0.00025559549,0.0011337543,0.008547967,0.009943457,0.00073227164,0.0024287815,0.0073337085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012373081,0.00022668863,0.0002678674,0.0008969081,0.03008926,0.0067656967,0.0052085677,0.0049613547,0.0005816416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024071956,0.000014606675,0.000496496,0.000024522777,0.000002349177,0.00007169945,0.035679903,0.00003980553,0.00007421293,0.95549196,0.002175517,0.0059049074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007291761,0.00014882229,0.0072268546,0.00089643843,0.000030034287,0.00041427335,0.10991986,0.0006139959,0.0009519727,0.44818488,0.43146253,0.00007748149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005760989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005892096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009943457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048722723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028392193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035351038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186432243","doi":"10.1080/09502386.2021.1946580","title":"Twilight of the <i>Eidos</i>: rhetoric, ecology, media (and <i>White Noise</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; White (mutation); Sociology; Aesthetics; Ecology; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07042576725464206,"score_gpt":0.27664380442353836,"score_spread":0.2062180371688963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186432243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06325081,0.028408917,0.023488268,0.41581464,0.0032751611,0.000036761936,0.000044675257,0.000106899046,0.4655738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91335243,0.0069545237,0.004694937,0.034915533,0.0019696273,0.00007581798,0.000019288509,0.00016394231,0.037853915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374557,0.004398607,0.000082673076,0.00040605076,0.0010398885,0.00032717205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99092615,0.0074240253,0.00052232953,0.00030120093,0.0004794408,0.00034679193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066973357,0.00057740445,0.00039511968,0.0024490254,0.011303134,0.0144141195,0.00097044883,0.004054413,0.0025045958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009222087,0.00027480526,0.00032026652,0.0016604301,0.058349557,0.01621675,0.005571544,0.007371943,0.0005681663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013954189,0.000015172992,0.00024765547,0.000049256796,0.000004588185,0.00008184299,0.060848277,0.00005498741,0.00017782718,0.9189912,0.01115246,0.008362843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016891121,0.00003772103,0.0008074866,0.00036817382,0.000011038617,0.000261907,0.06858254,0.00027363488,0.00085401005,0.5129151,0.4158342,0.000037436937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039090635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056059337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144141195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036796276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002505897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035419345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186756989","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14523","title":"Restart the ‘World’ with Revolutionary Ruptures: Imagining Identity through War &amp; in Crisis – Apocalyptic Rhetoric &amp; the American Civil Religion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Mythology; Tragedy (event); Identity (music); Narrative; State (computer science); Identity crisis; The Imaginary; Spanish Civil War; Value (mathematics); Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Literature; Art; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.03868946560302304,"score_gpt":0.30828087653417147,"score_spread":0.2695914109311484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186756989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2804331,0.0039363587,0.027539453,0.048405793,0.0010093043,0.000075798445,0.0000450736,0.00012070411,0.6384344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98288924,0.0006728791,0.0021614437,0.0011549378,0.000088937566,0.000028582213,0.000011801909,0.000048135644,0.012943932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979919,0.001631572,0.000018057468,0.00007889285,0.00014813303,0.00013142696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983034,0.0011641516,0.00012895468,0.0001225192,0.00010446395,0.00017642396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038169245,0.00041271767,0.00021464468,0.00092872995,0.0077793836,0.00876914,0.0007839481,0.0019049103,0.0029284507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038350278,0.00021562641,0.00023195473,0.00053951767,0.03274877,0.0112682935,0.004777931,0.0043758876,0.0005703568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021723887,0.000024981324,0.00027651477,0.00003635198,0.0000026018627,0.0001803077,0.45982015,0.00014254014,0.0004305025,0.5265684,0.004138188,0.008357762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018900942,0.000055443823,0.00070439355,0.00026022032,0.000009288445,0.00038737268,0.5798319,0.0009901898,0.0012101588,0.1888513,0.22765508,0.000025801579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027047612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039803865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00876914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028743478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019768511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02085495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187219275","doi":"10.22230/src.2021v12n1a363","title":"Lecture 1: Introduction to Rhetoric and Communication","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Humanities; Philosophy; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08794612105225028,"score_gpt":0.35434879041303713,"score_spread":0.2664026693607868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187219275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020761467,0.06497589,0.026262052,0.115776084,0.088923864,0.00026612793,0.00072290655,0.0009352051,0.70006174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064414054,0.06613375,0.014716786,0.027332852,0.06921978,0.00049314805,0.0009638856,0.000925031,0.7558007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987709,0.0003399068,0.000072543226,0.00019978243,0.00040253915,0.00021435365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845064,0.0007533807,0.00009739382,0.00009077358,0.0003221934,0.00028568174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013835502,0.0011974347,0.0008136491,0.0010914017,0.0027431,0.006063485,0.0010362581,0.002998477,0.078171514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004863834,0.00052128365,0.000797938,0.00096019596,0.0028597303,0.005145837,0.002486332,0.009804987,0.037403863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066381304,0.00010955141,0.0001113987,0.000533271,0.000005517979,0.0001508064,0.0016652466,0.0003544372,0.0011149287,0.20958865,0.68021256,0.10608728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000638995,0.000052207815,0.00024852314,0.00043911306,0.000002875642,0.0001616369,0.00030593364,0.00012231273,0.0001999863,0.041937377,0.95650893,0.000014669628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020161844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015884148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078171514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032957117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00246111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26150978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189780089","doi":"10.52086/001c.27124","title":"Implicit acts of filth: the parodic virtues of cleanliness","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TEXT","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Narrative; Art; Storytelling; Power (physics); Literature","score_opus":0.15609774115581596,"score_gpt":0.29175744499250794,"score_spread":0.13565970383669199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189780089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13789655,0.002489217,0.020181898,0.020321317,0.00052265375,0.00003484516,0.00006260511,0.00013258622,0.81835836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781189,0.00023833236,0.0011535573,0.000779944,0.00010673459,0.000018907866,0.000014302818,0.000055244,0.019514056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409014,0.0041787815,0.0001243982,0.0003716776,0.000855121,0.00037985572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948774,0.002885196,0.000429289,0.0009688387,0.000659353,0.00017985441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004635831,0.00034469855,0.00033071093,0.00086449087,0.007460544,0.009201094,0.0011949918,0.002993068,0.0048501417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013147156,0.00032675118,0.00022701261,0.0006211187,0.03862763,0.008798808,0.00592539,0.0049992027,0.00074742193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028703089,0.000010105661,0.00041592773,0.000049118808,0.0000032316702,0.00018954324,0.09438716,0.00005146782,0.00034396932,0.89241594,0.0033431798,0.008761604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053364707,0.00010706364,0.0027885349,0.0008375203,0.000033332766,0.0011329715,0.114670694,0.0012362717,0.0027109224,0.3431512,0.533198,0.000080080354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005430486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009664807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009201094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036051767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018362383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026157498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190410429","doi":"10.15273/jue.v11i2.11040","title":"“Hey there, Brian”: Voicing Mormon Cosmopolitanism in a College Apartment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Morality; Voice; Absurdity; Sociology; Identity (music); Postmodernism; Context (archaeology); Aesthetics; Anthropology; Religious studies; Philosophy; History; Linguistics; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07816427885885145,"score_gpt":0.310719751959666,"score_spread":0.23255547310081454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190410429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8633444,0.0017459135,0.006519615,0.013409883,0.00082393724,0.00006472177,0.0000323923,0.00013387827,0.11392515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905405,0.00016346533,0.0005097807,0.0007806524,0.00006517754,0.000011020192,0.0000068574614,0.00005675163,0.0078658955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970452,0.0021182923,0.000036872836,0.00019451245,0.000265267,0.00033979784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789965,0.0010079374,0.00024387213,0.00017422524,0.00016733854,0.00050695013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020561717,0.00040121493,0.00033922624,0.00043410133,0.011901668,0.0046812156,0.00077263464,0.001491109,0.0036451658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004502255,0.00024561383,0.00019450225,0.0003628641,0.012303104,0.002673052,0.005573518,0.003585382,0.00044559228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103729966,0.000041104777,0.002473143,0.00010581178,0.00000912758,0.0012858541,0.9349443,0.000064633416,0.0030577895,0.0388208,0.005329572,0.013764241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099777735,0.000086309316,0.0029355073,0.00019053326,0.000011592626,0.0010873027,0.85803455,0.00026336324,0.0017579406,0.003098405,0.13248813,0.000036541624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070724864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023594782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011901668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022491706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001206095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016318917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195378494","doi":"10.31542/muse.v5i1.2039","title":"White Lie of Persuasive Communication","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student eJournal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Visual rhetoric; Manifesto; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02811502097733931,"score_gpt":0.23080007200770042,"score_spread":0.2026850510303611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195378494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006103011,0.018614419,0.03073689,0.10403606,0.005237363,0.00007490969,0.000053464417,0.00024165145,0.8349023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7025586,0.017915625,0.019942885,0.022086158,0.008873459,0.00036572365,0.000083567604,0.0005032994,0.22767058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853182,0.008931003,0.00031793476,0.0009427586,0.004011243,0.00047886503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800295,0.013973777,0.0010029185,0.0017752599,0.0024914953,0.00072699937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010911448,0.00084661454,0.0004532274,0.0031677748,0.0069505363,0.016048554,0.0011606856,0.0054682763,0.015921813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024909219,0.0003782661,0.00042116398,0.0014076943,0.022283483,0.013542566,0.006109679,0.005508861,0.003998441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020955034,0.00001650263,0.000120225945,0.00017393495,0.000009862651,0.000098722914,0.009739283,0.000100823585,0.00025709547,0.93995863,0.021348666,0.028155379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014720321,0.00003793046,0.0002252888,0.00060891063,0.000012874654,0.0002499913,0.0044440418,0.0004752784,0.0007075306,0.40062708,0.59257543,0.000020927144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012956811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011992285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016048554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033512928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034940438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05770594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198347636","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2021.1965683","title":"A Legacy of Cunning Rhetorical Agility:<i>Métis</i>Polymorphism in the Protest Rhetoric of Sojourner Truth and Sarah Grimké","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women s Studies in Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Metis; Scholarship; Mythology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Literature; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.13270642211860148,"score_gpt":0.33378413422074854,"score_spread":0.20107771210214706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198347636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14342104,0.019128418,0.021342976,0.25149792,0.0030634846,0.00004569818,0.0000505567,0.00018715144,0.5612628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712524,0.0014758611,0.0013821251,0.0064289533,0.0008403182,0.000028432616,0.00000899245,0.000092881564,0.018489983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921733,0.0059534474,0.00010943452,0.0004619742,0.00096609845,0.00033578614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913242,0.0070803436,0.00056347094,0.00036774663,0.00039558546,0.00026871197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005773496,0.00037754525,0.00037164596,0.0015317664,0.010258508,0.00870279,0.00067559426,0.0027124444,0.002278086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012468063,0.00024410943,0.00018013085,0.0010193766,0.038490836,0.0075024567,0.0045741964,0.0062918994,0.0004357853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021107271,0.0000068566064,0.00024590836,0.000059978396,0.000004222392,0.00014228799,0.116767146,0.00005994374,0.00023353919,0.8661124,0.008181501,0.008165214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021059986,0.000063840474,0.0007496633,0.00061744597,0.000014210325,0.0006860644,0.093774624,0.00056442304,0.0013946043,0.31229228,0.58978194,0.000039820185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020969133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027429236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010258508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004359111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019079489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031627715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200088660","doi":"10.31468/dwr.885","title":"Unruly rhetorics: Protest, persuasion, and publics. Jonathan Alexander, Susan C. Jarratt, &amp; Nancy Welch (Eds.). University of Pittsburgh Press, 2018.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Publics; Psychoanalysis; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.16435934812784747,"score_gpt":0.34526360870462197,"score_spread":0.1809042605767745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200088660","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028054097,0.7919183,0.0015589822,0.05795561,0.004380116,0.000017437224,0.000033246364,0.000060387916,0.1412705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21433197,0.6229,0.0021728128,0.011663393,0.010018765,0.000110697736,0.000104633335,0.00019304961,0.13850473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981236,0.0010631968,0.00006178817,0.00011852307,0.00050422363,0.00012866932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925517,0.00615029,0.0004512581,0.00017688643,0.00037717813,0.00029267065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002942838,0.00091807195,0.00082512305,0.003066115,0.0034149867,0.012715073,0.0010049902,0.0037704273,0.009952644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00823236,0.000579343,0.00033185774,0.0030868219,0.011657289,0.012467841,0.0028727492,0.0040504504,0.0029431821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043124895,0.00007221138,0.00044345326,0.0016387794,0.000028313867,0.00027983348,0.03230146,0.0002043834,0.00028165648,0.47895017,0.27211994,0.21363673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013076153,0.000026200498,0.0008191647,0.0032196445,0.000017792405,0.0003235603,0.01728249,0.00013645456,0.0002705263,0.15819971,0.819674,0.000017494222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022595495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051678536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012715073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028845062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039941045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033294857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200768094","doi":"","title":"Internet Rumors and Intercultural Ethics--A Case Study of Panic-stricken Rush for Salt in China and Iodine Pill in America After Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rumor; Intercultural communication; The Internet; China; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.0504287164754212,"score_gpt":0.3258933496289537,"score_spread":0.27546463315353253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200768094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98684454,0.0011783266,0.00057091925,0.0034853627,0.00006799871,0.000048748647,0.00001835856,0.000009502874,0.007776168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526393,0.0013727705,0.00045675505,0.0005436918,0.000051734845,0.00003274869,0.000013795741,0.000009435696,0.0022550886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944581,0.004310917,0.00018055903,0.00016881134,0.00032666125,0.0005549145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909827,0.00639297,0.0011288988,0.00030709174,0.00041010423,0.00077821355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037322524,0.0006684061,0.000573083,0.0021340025,0.01820308,0.0040995865,0.0014826985,0.00468698,0.0018759139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010181021,0.00048268316,0.000574907,0.0019847578,0.0078120064,0.0044031134,0.004572186,0.0040560113,0.00023145658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003208573,0.00020123106,0.011652983,0.00016486946,0.000019401754,0.04287034,0.93253124,0.00006671112,0.0003316058,0.0043278704,0.0015011184,0.0063006207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006449771,0.00005398422,0.0040644985,0.00014170876,0.000016711572,0.007084982,0.97668946,0.00019175131,0.0002116565,0.0006515582,0.010869395,0.000017867895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009051157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021218015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01820308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038091089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020763811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027637124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201131868","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2021v46n3a4173","title":"Putting Race at the Forefront of Communication Studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Concordia University; Carleton University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0960480089817023,"score_gpt":0.287531318111273,"score_spread":0.19148330912957073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201131868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013180343,0.10868007,0.0067841667,0.6405659,0.0041149226,0.000023151702,0.000095571886,0.00006420752,0.22649172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85897976,0.04483137,0.004345328,0.05867841,0.0071546524,0.00010043389,0.00006589367,0.00032573647,0.025518399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835767,0.010955102,0.00029311737,0.0009009083,0.0027746437,0.0014995442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401103,0.046631314,0.0018339845,0.0021612595,0.0059808493,0.0032822723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022321342,0.0007334918,0.0018109324,0.0075166547,0.02602887,0.027385633,0.0034789087,0.012384117,0.019571735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04186845,0.0006286441,0.00043328918,0.006729096,0.08575825,0.041181784,0.009230875,0.014354608,0.001607896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002580361,0.000020681451,0.00033909944,0.00022935231,0.000012165583,0.000064368636,0.038121358,0.00008276944,0.00009977704,0.9254441,0.01602046,0.019540083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000188488,0.000018667475,0.00071433745,0.0012533958,0.000018788642,0.000057718204,0.05466902,0.00017655168,0.00015823395,0.71118087,0.23170076,0.000032815788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10236814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12597476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10236814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019323336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026576769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20354462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201392284","doi":"10.22215/etd/2009-09238","title":"Theorizing racialized discourse: perils and paradoxes in Canadian national security","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Humanities; Media studies; Art","score_opus":0.0263981967015169,"score_gpt":0.31135523007852417,"score_spread":0.2849570333770073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201392284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43840668,0.005236703,0.0043962463,0.060821995,0.00019324513,0.0000716858,0.00019288277,0.000041112096,0.4906394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919316,0.0009044619,0.0007727937,0.00054332317,0.000019698065,0.00002052177,0.00002816477,0.000025249961,0.0057540303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438334,0.0024285677,0.00015589304,0.000566169,0.001418553,0.001047517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863304,0.0073162913,0.0010949508,0.00079328154,0.0035132065,0.000951907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010941322,0.00063899014,0.0006073427,0.0070092264,0.038659785,0.01680378,0.0026201024,0.0035643275,0.00808545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025190078,0.000543464,0.0003832379,0.009605219,0.05015087,0.011488162,0.007649286,0.0045638215,0.0003074466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022876031,0.00001530477,0.002425853,0.000060077262,0.0000071765817,0.00013383634,0.36570233,0.00016463155,0.00013049076,0.6216139,0.0024980064,0.007225495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003148421,0.000014491903,0.009236338,0.00064761104,0.000058073736,0.0001172235,0.6733802,0.0017099614,0.00043361902,0.19748217,0.11683115,0.000057730602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.944196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94268006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14009659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14009659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114486545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202304340","doi":"10.22230/src.2021v12n1a371","title":"Lecture 5: Kenneth Burke","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rhetoric; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13898514414358865,"score_gpt":0.3743870058870377,"score_spread":0.23540186174344907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202304340","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028383203,0.059746653,0.0079872925,0.56020004,0.074265815,0.00006960029,0.00017168769,0.00037288613,0.29434773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052741062,0.032937806,0.005042357,0.10022711,0.01662903,0.00010172181,0.00015227323,0.00038183952,0.79178673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976047,0.0006108889,0.00008132805,0.0004489835,0.00097143254,0.00028250762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964014,0.0012519609,0.00018106599,0.00014189836,0.0008974528,0.0011261719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030816041,0.0006560342,0.00055585784,0.0011398401,0.003822179,0.0064008636,0.0007144333,0.0028486904,0.04543416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010483105,0.0003684117,0.0003987065,0.0005896703,0.002559988,0.0057373443,0.002472637,0.0087668225,0.025616826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027972863,0.00003936726,0.00018743136,0.00006520281,0.000003912631,0.00008694848,0.0007933585,0.00007770136,0.00027602018,0.04260304,0.9235851,0.0322539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038122673,0.00001798247,0.00015127752,0.00020420607,0.0000024087572,0.00015214665,0.0009761256,0.00007360075,0.00018987939,0.012160321,0.98605806,0.000010230772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003922434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006050004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04543416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004602017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003955845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15199238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203910674","doi":"","title":"Ética e identidades culturais em diferentes contextos: uma entrevista com Isaac Nahon-Serfaty","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Intexto","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Media studies; Humanities; Anthropology; Art","score_opus":0.11154793361064334,"score_gpt":0.3073391982271878,"score_spread":0.19579126461654445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203910674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39823654,0.03915344,0.0035174352,0.5085926,0.0024409052,0.00009796722,0.000045463592,0.00004159765,0.047874153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431689,0.014150769,0.0018178717,0.025832081,0.0006458728,0.00008620355,0.00001386591,0.00009009843,0.014194447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98468184,0.011638397,0.00021390502,0.00066850934,0.0014038853,0.0013934984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703177,0.024799835,0.0011998202,0.0004419671,0.0016249227,0.0016157592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027611919,0.00071318744,0.0011720334,0.0025713218,0.04007756,0.016979467,0.00238641,0.007740591,0.0025418897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236215,0.0009534336,0.0004513229,0.0031268871,0.050124995,0.016994834,0.012801861,0.018554434,0.0002874246],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009120203,0.000011441535,0.00037207702,0.00003249365,0.0000018384485,0.00031400466,0.9752362,0.000016605823,0.00007444209,0.017512161,0.002980438,0.0034391761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041177877,0.000013512217,0.00045777138,0.0002796641,0.000004085517,0.00025223728,0.9411884,0.000048256847,0.0000844376,0.002691565,0.054963447,0.000012533675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070090406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094751686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070090406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017059911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015731068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14602757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206879814","doi":"10.22230/src.2021v12n1a373","title":"Lecture 6: Contemporary Research in Rhetoric/Persuasion","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3709957450729486,"score_gpt":0.4404180209257045,"score_spread":0.0694222758527559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206879814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066630673,0.3080234,0.01258418,0.32065368,0.013616421,0.000027489228,0.00004804033,0.0001126131,0.33827108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4633676,0.2796587,0.010690022,0.04834577,0.035584353,0.00019643534,0.00010246655,0.00047949667,0.16157512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929785,0.0042902045,0.00017773238,0.00066080515,0.0015076158,0.00038517851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97969306,0.017532794,0.0006202698,0.000530581,0.0010627687,0.0005605119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007498346,0.0005938788,0.0008660858,0.0019413659,0.0042557465,0.009514829,0.0010509413,0.004364889,0.013719932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016479092,0.00036569702,0.0006640966,0.0025107553,0.02028941,0.010769556,0.002445923,0.011953313,0.0038783096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034023495,0.00003157053,0.00016845686,0.00046167418,0.000009751009,0.00006130382,0.007740973,0.00016640825,0.00025236118,0.90380615,0.05093744,0.0363299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014817254,0.000056403165,0.0004494323,0.0010885508,0.000011545853,0.00018513083,0.0047978135,0.00032415707,0.00053460675,0.3411089,0.65140563,0.000022958387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022677246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017867805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013719932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067071887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030403272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04866433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207413990","doi":"10.1007/s11245-021-09775-w","title":"Introduction: Adversariality in Argument","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04033517017221984,"score_gpt":0.24772980532312303,"score_spread":0.20739463515090317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207413990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057465946,0.034122087,0.03742693,0.37051564,0.03579325,0.00007299891,0.000896182,0.00021245689,0.51521385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44364542,0.03010074,0.014702813,0.1006979,0.15639928,0.00038578792,0.00086852594,0.00080101535,0.25239864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997666,0.0012391404,0.00009440973,0.00035239552,0.0005131204,0.00013503953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98302585,0.014652342,0.00041241755,0.00046303176,0.0010927872,0.00035365764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026225196,0.0007188887,0.00063168246,0.0023753843,0.0041683693,0.008033446,0.001621715,0.0062057488,0.032108456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108875185,0.00038605806,0.00056325697,0.004156619,0.0116319405,0.010896,0.003103886,0.011649228,0.0057364036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063179764,0.000007632863,0.000055272612,0.000111839174,0.000002605328,0.000028348279,0.0011472051,0.0000782274,0.00003979387,0.9118592,0.08164371,0.0050198114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012266237,0.000012659835,0.00030936307,0.00049789035,0.000009242967,0.00013192843,0.001223921,0.00048023646,0.00013173795,0.53505504,0.46211872,0.00001707811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019730614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001751516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032108456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025404633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015710337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10741347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211601501","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14639781.v1","title":"Between Rhetoric and Propaganda: A Case Study of Appeals to Pathos in Iraq War Justification","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Rhetorical question; Appeal to emotion; Rhetoric; Politics; Appeal; Sociology; Invective; Political philosophy; Political science; Law; Media studies; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13726454871136365,"score_gpt":0.31797735043068703,"score_spread":0.18071280171932338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211601501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98226786,0.00031716574,0.0010885483,0.0023177736,0.00006454425,0.000053563697,0.000034983907,0.0000106161215,0.013844912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957266,0.00027134828,0.00074922555,0.00052936777,0.00010374861,0.00005231151,0.000025580199,0.000029388035,0.0025125598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98905164,0.008175121,0.00023505218,0.00038786538,0.0012104014,0.0009398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571842,0.037110347,0.0025120422,0.0007441604,0.0015298594,0.00091952825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006638817,0.0006108525,0.0005870843,0.0036579932,0.013726277,0.0063218097,0.0012526058,0.003930666,0.0030564882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028457342,0.00048631034,0.00039883956,0.003292291,0.0106577035,0.0041217012,0.004085384,0.0052162716,0.0005239984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005748281,0.0001195618,0.007865275,0.00010189513,0.000012743799,0.006682421,0.96961987,0.00007814806,0.001230785,0.0072583808,0.001190544,0.005782872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018186693,0.000066567954,0.012528414,0.00016388064,0.000014568307,0.0021376768,0.9522862,0.0005127902,0.0007392229,0.0020917743,0.029407034,0.000033758977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009303431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0210985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013726277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035585875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014247708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035109818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212104888","doi":"10.3138/cras-2021-001","title":"Trump’s Base! You Can Say That Again!! An Optimistic Deconstruction of Base Politics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Politics; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Base (topology); Narrative; Aesthetics; Offensive; Media studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Management","score_opus":0.0808901237220964,"score_gpt":0.30048349682314024,"score_spread":0.21959337310104382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212104888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040195625,0.025377287,0.005596621,0.5588517,0.0030475445,0.00002304863,0.000058575413,0.000060602455,0.36678895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941237,0.009724156,0.0014268808,0.023425875,0.0014738368,0.000041119984,0.000019486899,0.0001171987,0.022534491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964824,0.002031619,0.000028936738,0.00019674448,0.0008172911,0.0004429348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964652,0.002191128,0.00015832127,0.00016456653,0.00067377946,0.00034701376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004374498,0.0003419777,0.0003290796,0.0022487992,0.011559261,0.008918019,0.0011813563,0.002487599,0.003216663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076905186,0.00017847557,0.00016413974,0.0019888158,0.039327223,0.010259675,0.0031247577,0.007432709,0.0005144339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008939104,0.00000624028,0.00012308988,0.00003860299,0.0000013619077,0.0000557648,0.03818812,0.000020690535,0.00008091909,0.9265997,0.025443947,0.009432725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011477294,0.000017078333,0.0007666382,0.0005424257,0.0000066568423,0.00013334322,0.09976027,0.00018075091,0.0002906917,0.27708703,0.6211803,0.000023379185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054492466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087444685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054492466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0119752055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011579377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108350575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213200088","doi":"10.2478/mik-2021-0008","title":"Arctic Drama to Sámi Theatre – Cultural Clashes Towards Decolonisation: In Shared Dialogic Spaces","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Art History & Criticism","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Decolonization; Dramaturgy; Indigenous; History; Sociology; Gender studies; Ethnology; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08545487664471708,"score_gpt":0.2768928002740283,"score_spread":0.19143792362931122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213200088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16490522,0.0061262995,0.0036857368,0.017212285,0.0026579425,0.000036753765,0.000049955903,0.00020510652,0.80512077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560578,0.0010828449,0.00045204055,0.001076472,0.00041704756,0.000031088653,0.000027399816,0.000114359435,0.04074102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938268,0.004131511,0.000087441316,0.00039731272,0.0008210823,0.00073582464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973349,0.0013859291,0.00023740486,0.0002134368,0.00031721237,0.0005110774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041159727,0.00072766026,0.0005147424,0.0012554061,0.017837282,0.013317383,0.0012209475,0.0019170665,0.008355502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004400142,0.00024603572,0.0003753529,0.0013033448,0.030321222,0.003897747,0.009703458,0.0034637658,0.0010213115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008193613,0.0000420031,0.0010187605,0.00019739952,0.000014931842,0.0010978621,0.76294994,0.00026654234,0.0008592596,0.1896197,0.025861058,0.017990539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009520424,0.00006343394,0.001841651,0.0005742158,0.000010144881,0.00055842637,0.45709002,0.00021617794,0.0005203545,0.009298541,0.52978563,0.000031831103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069746957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010625659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017837282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068591023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024524608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04976654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213750737","doi":"10.5406/pluralist.16.3.0001","title":"Beneath the Ordinary: Toward a Deweyan Aesthetics of Place","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pluralist","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07230945247287672,"score_gpt":0.2548559485557772,"score_spread":0.18254649608290047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213750737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042103443,0.00811025,0.080292515,0.1319952,0.0028600604,0.00006949738,0.000112967515,0.00015399329,0.73430204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398655,0.0014143963,0.009261695,0.004993563,0.0012601388,0.00012003933,0.000043522992,0.0003260171,0.042715166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924257,0.005499887,0.00018756819,0.00059630745,0.0007194247,0.00057116244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935116,0.00441548,0.00038458785,0.0006610309,0.0006085525,0.0004188236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008313219,0.0010105117,0.00093286665,0.0038710695,0.0167849,0.02138875,0.002415574,0.006328487,0.007018492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010477705,0.0006751325,0.00049278064,0.0033128902,0.0839376,0.024315672,0.01020194,0.01251664,0.0010517421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005584759,0.0000036485421,0.00004305543,0.000014287454,0.0000010263409,0.0000140505435,0.018637365,0.000024143616,0.000033332144,0.97885144,0.0010766003,0.0012955898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011729123,0.000012750336,0.00008407232,0.00010017321,0.0000074277987,0.000063391744,0.02549356,0.00024518822,0.00015450516,0.8883985,0.08541748,0.000011239102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055705034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007434264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02138875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043315985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048177065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04396504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214422783","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14656548.v1","title":"No MSG: Chinese Restaurant Menus, Monosodium Glutamate and the Trope of Risk in Shaping Chinese Culture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Professional Engineers Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monosodium glutamate; Synecdoche; Rhetorical question; Advertising; Business; Trope (literature); Chinese culture; China; Psychology; Marketing; Food science; Political science; Linguistics; Art; Literature; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.027408263577403905,"score_gpt":0.25929126479688186,"score_spread":0.23188300121947797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214422783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8669061,0.0018166278,0.0047575682,0.014872739,0.00021732165,0.00004239787,0.00008024133,0.00004426768,0.11126277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586135,0.00027349472,0.00036233565,0.00030605693,0.000018187731,0.0000070195024,0.0000099898825,0.000010212283,0.0031514678],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871767,0.00060007285,0.00004409682,0.00013585042,0.00033247337,0.00016985158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974439,0.0012513408,0.00047612342,0.00019707147,0.00039978416,0.0002318414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025181128,0.00051318767,0.00019267065,0.0012303453,0.0071834084,0.004399983,0.0005726489,0.0011002959,0.0026596184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039512953,0.00018147795,0.00020891755,0.0012316644,0.019141974,0.0024956865,0.002578194,0.0015135955,0.00016104212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001240125,0.00002008376,0.019331383,0.000267616,0.000023899898,0.0012302385,0.7736814,0.0003109241,0.0041307253,0.18217327,0.0021896136,0.016516907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031185667,0.00012484942,0.044002634,0.0004398954,0.000104664476,0.0007418465,0.7675192,0.0014246027,0.0048563154,0.034409612,0.14620368,0.00014142816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1474792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1367532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1474792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009214632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074848305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29324156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215178658","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14655993.v1","title":"The Politics of Media and 9/11","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Terrorism; Adversary; News media; Politics; Media coverage; Political science; Media studies; Media event; Mass media; Media bias; Public opinion; Advertising; Public relations; Sociology; Law; History; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.08733004600139371,"score_gpt":0.2675925959321395,"score_spread":0.1802625499307458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215178658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016895998,0.004276669,0.0015166625,0.05292737,0.0012673049,0.000017101216,0.000091910304,0.000046048397,0.922961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80136603,0.0038531632,0.0012065343,0.01108539,0.0022740061,0.00007428221,0.000078009776,0.00024429196,0.1798184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288636,0.0043603745,0.000148282,0.0006819797,0.0010061677,0.0009168088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942327,0.0036535403,0.00050892757,0.0004506134,0.0005164402,0.0006377799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005997654,0.000555638,0.00029485085,0.0024684395,0.010978236,0.020849138,0.00086890033,0.0038431005,0.024301676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067379903,0.00036004218,0.00040592576,0.0020102933,0.02401249,0.011844841,0.006552074,0.0069764266,0.0032415758],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021252517,0.000013576974,0.00030901638,0.00003922649,0.0000028608492,0.000086453765,0.012479452,0.000024371291,0.00010924612,0.9656848,0.014886234,0.0063435114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015903765,0.00002903449,0.0013791482,0.0003773043,0.000007286157,0.00018685864,0.015921293,0.00012183082,0.0007954912,0.0779637,0.9031786,0.000023605528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008020559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008292328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024301676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007822703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002821986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08129722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W322704269","doi":"","title":"On the Return of (the Repressed): Rhetoric","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic (Winnipeg)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Metaphor; Literature; Cliché; Exaggeration; Freudian slip; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04565883424302513,"score_gpt":0.24401264816136295,"score_spread":0.1983538139183378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W322704269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078035966,0.01611294,0.034376968,0.13967444,0.0036477933,0.00006670764,0.00009022564,0.0003376546,0.7276573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92481995,0.002461131,0.0024951387,0.00965467,0.0015048754,0.00007289983,0.000040237806,0.0004016918,0.058549386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98724127,0.009822071,0.00017205691,0.0006208838,0.0015960776,0.0005476187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929893,0.004836301,0.00040106327,0.0005385416,0.00096623955,0.0002685134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067747836,0.0005706167,0.00046677174,0.0022757004,0.011092678,0.01603843,0.0015261285,0.0028043238,0.003802021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013202282,0.00028921352,0.00037619704,0.0014232324,0.052148566,0.012732588,0.00578043,0.008133083,0.0011414482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016504924,0.000006654412,0.00009019615,0.000046162633,0.0000031461439,0.00012947606,0.08909736,0.00003900165,0.00025406427,0.8990298,0.0067632506,0.0045244563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002016746,0.0000491364,0.0003044586,0.00055876374,0.00001532699,0.00042818944,0.09546435,0.00040682146,0.0011342099,0.31455138,0.5870279,0.00003934358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048875944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044536116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01603843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007585328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036300833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05503571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W323987688","doi":"10.1353/srm.2012.0006","title":"Spheres of Action: Speech and Performance in Romantic Culture by Alexander Dick, Angela Esterhammer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Romanticism","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Ideology; Romance; Aesthetics; Sociology; Action (physics); Romanticism; Power (physics); Agency (philosophy); Subject (documents); Realm; Fantasy; Literature; Law; Art; Politics; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.10902694091472603,"score_gpt":0.33064932385045387,"score_spread":0.22162238293572784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W323987688","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004284233,0.84086096,0.0007054569,0.059867583,0.0043177647,0.000017302898,0.000054253407,0.000030551935,0.089861855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14311974,0.647739,0.0011447361,0.013876687,0.010496147,0.00009774737,0.00012236343,0.000108931876,0.18329462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895096,0.00046290059,0.000027903887,0.00011762886,0.00032527684,0.00011539232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988053,0.00073496875,0.00008228618,0.000036969785,0.00019173611,0.00014875199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172465,0.0010928743,0.0006457172,0.0019789226,0.0030793105,0.004887402,0.00093183084,0.0024683843,0.004356527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019791855,0.00046819774,0.00028079236,0.0023131578,0.007240187,0.0057127667,0.0020601097,0.0033879536,0.001663221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051406256,0.00007774114,0.0006235606,0.00067122595,0.000019875055,0.00022739831,0.028296866,0.00034477035,0.0002500475,0.15191504,0.6785181,0.13900386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006684047,0.000022019074,0.0029974382,0.0011316476,0.0000100580955,0.00027135957,0.011834488,0.000112947986,0.00011781156,0.019413855,0.9640532,0.000028374667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02207881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025895251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02207881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004413856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027674814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04390061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W325241925","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Justin Ross Morris' \"Narrative, intersectionality and argumentative discourse\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Narrative; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03739160182555434,"score_gpt":0.2557795178622668,"score_spread":0.21838791603671248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W325241925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025917834,0.0027980374,0.00017863899,0.9596619,0.035251327,0.000012973076,0.00006580924,0.00004081395,0.0017312701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009373666,0.0028198662,0.0002706511,0.9357469,0.03554822,0.00013466069,0.000046877263,0.00017760029,0.015881622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374604,0.0028283955,0.00027069417,0.0009509172,0.0017139803,0.0004900045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98018736,0.012270167,0.0014816902,0.00047020274,0.00441998,0.0011705573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005195292,0.001865014,0.0015794932,0.0015789331,0.007051211,0.0071862484,0.00704391,0.026534257,0.008689447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04474407,0.000660875,0.0012731847,0.0023351726,0.010999576,0.007751725,0.0057440614,0.034430698,0.005368035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016889157,0.0000022864792,0.000027249725,0.000078614605,0.000003903114,0.00015361988,0.00091916317,0.000017663682,0.000031975556,0.0024845055,0.99530137,0.0009626782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021358968,0.000015722462,0.00034657307,0.00081714534,0.000018035882,0.00031350274,0.0041176435,0.00013087672,0.00019789708,0.006493002,0.9874791,0.000049142705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04101345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049467504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04101345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008319656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00574157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081549466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3254258","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2265.1988.tb03850.x","title":"A Reason for Reasoning? Theorizing the Function of Public Argument through an Analysis of Dissident Protest","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Endocrinology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Performative utterance; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Conviction; Rationality; Function (biology); Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.18650588525463682,"score_gpt":0.39419103357246144,"score_spread":0.2076851483178246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3254258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17881134,0.0037253464,0.2982541,0.1148669,0.00047385774,0.00015750366,0.00020478191,0.00045337202,0.40305275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97575694,0.00033620888,0.019096939,0.00085589563,0.00014420447,0.00006898858,0.0000326899,0.00005730131,0.0036507833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99369335,0.004157206,0.00017099017,0.00073530775,0.0006808356,0.0005622873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97520226,0.018882921,0.0015059543,0.0024528024,0.00113209,0.00082400674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012562659,0.0005218919,0.00063142664,0.00399582,0.0036657944,0.00870219,0.0021658784,0.004187164,0.00808077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024330946,0.00047912844,0.0010559497,0.0016708919,0.045728516,0.024207773,0.003973704,0.0033866742,0.00053511857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000974316,0.000005420213,0.00024045054,0.000015227681,0.0000051314214,0.000052610234,0.00133788,0.00023309111,0.000030828483,0.9964399,0.00028193483,0.0013476436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000896544,0.000004388918,0.000114226,0.000015810621,0.0000035554342,0.00003941913,0.00077901606,0.0014777476,0.000051579267,0.9946585,0.0028424778,0.000004424185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015157141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012562659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050860997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002114718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066438496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338308767","doi":"","title":"From Spectacular to Speculative: The Shifting Rhetoric in Recent Gay AIDS Memoirs","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic (Winnipeg)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Gender studies; History; Media studies; Law; Medicine; Literature; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04563966052434194,"score_gpt":0.2739499612789437,"score_spread":0.2283103007546018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338308767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21225193,0.05312468,0.007887415,0.3611296,0.015848137,0.00007803895,0.00013163361,0.00021667629,0.34933192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94195175,0.006911411,0.0012447299,0.019854438,0.003535038,0.00005166477,0.000051469877,0.00026509902,0.0261345],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829374,0.013045556,0.00028564228,0.00058716786,0.0022907183,0.00085347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97761476,0.015947346,0.0012646676,0.000796347,0.0031832878,0.001193581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013487543,0.0006548073,0.00049073313,0.0037793033,0.029603507,0.01889198,0.0018956356,0.004378196,0.0028821277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028112186,0.0005433257,0.0002765597,0.00289124,0.048429232,0.010403467,0.00880075,0.009763708,0.0005077007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034677465,0.000016053893,0.00039865167,0.00015714754,0.0000071071445,0.00034403356,0.83813316,0.000039452272,0.0003882424,0.12953007,0.019844431,0.011106943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012007384,0.000027433849,0.0009245711,0.0007208231,0.000012764909,0.00033388424,0.5153413,0.00012550845,0.00059260335,0.015620049,0.4662536,0.000035424488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023804003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047937393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029603507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013896935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004991791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10082978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339222831","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-5705.2002.tb00017.x","title":"“The Great Communicator” and “The Great Talker” on the Radio: Projecting Presidential Personas","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Presidential Studies Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Rhetoric; Political science; Character (mathematics); Persona; Law; Linguistics; Art; Humanities; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08396634978852817,"score_gpt":0.26788132284603405,"score_spread":0.18391497305750587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339222831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90225863,0.00052593974,0.0017776844,0.0019458667,0.00009148584,0.000014020137,0.00003443483,0.000033452816,0.09331836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669975,0.00037377712,0.00033534414,0.00011739086,0.000050664414,0.000009239892,0.00002479477,0.0000151610475,0.0023739433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971961,0.0017371398,0.000050506904,0.00011748606,0.0006187194,0.0002800284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474406,0.0030326867,0.0009947751,0.00019565405,0.0006290798,0.00040373474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028135264,0.00038916102,0.00014794366,0.0018160078,0.0033667965,0.006557648,0.00027770855,0.0008833138,0.004203531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010985756,0.00027218653,0.00019807463,0.0011428687,0.0041963495,0.003765845,0.0033820085,0.0017111608,0.0007071229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018343251,0.00010282322,0.09628392,0.00019077145,0.000038159422,0.00049259554,0.75938606,0.0002462002,0.003770034,0.03203662,0.0051809084,0.10208852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009613858,0.00014055257,0.14414,0.00021700475,0.000048925187,0.00047196346,0.8184627,0.00051899,0.0019217867,0.003213834,0.030804088,0.00005051624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032584034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068314536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006557648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011792998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008301819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014879584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33948813","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2102-9_13","title":"‘Expressive Uncertainty’: Edmund Burke’s Theory of the Sublime and Eighteenth-Century Conceptions of Metaphor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Archives internationales d'histoire des idées","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Sublime; Rhetoric; Relation (database); Beauty; CLARITY; Poetry; Literal and figurative language; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Aesthetics; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04650480768864042,"score_gpt":0.21785461478420592,"score_spread":0.17134980709556552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33948813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019908227,0.046199895,0.047653813,0.07407509,0.001788839,0.00006974055,0.00012190967,0.0000883405,0.81009406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88794094,0.007647549,0.01299254,0.006725086,0.0010298879,0.00019151007,0.000052101415,0.00017001515,0.08325037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778974,0.001590871,0.000039366943,0.00017460505,0.00022594562,0.00017941998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981377,0.0013786842,0.000083051935,0.00015703462,0.00017461115,0.00006892224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028536804,0.00069568347,0.000570022,0.0016746529,0.004735823,0.007354646,0.0016405166,0.0043826797,0.00542908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005526227,0.0004775169,0.00042527565,0.0018041201,0.035171513,0.016609922,0.0034607765,0.007069152,0.0007657975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045647707,0.0000040920677,0.000015508951,0.000009990573,9.768615e-7,0.000017121654,0.004684703,0.000031602616,0.000019343752,0.99229723,0.0017908516,0.0011239036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010849537,0.000005253373,0.00006088387,0.00008024311,0.0000026053442,0.00005937591,0.0025724906,0.0001628436,0.00007940822,0.92641735,0.07053936,0.000009273572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047775116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055037094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007354646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004419971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018378699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032069266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339867809","doi":"","title":"Seeing and Being Seen in Media Culture: Shelley Niro's Honey Moccasin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cineaction!","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Identity (music); Postmodernism; Kitsch; Sociology; Popular culture; Essentialism; Politics; Gender studies; Art; Literature; Media studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03192304052602533,"score_gpt":0.22492420058966614,"score_spread":0.19300116006364082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339867809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24234754,0.032616206,0.0023317577,0.27677932,0.0076141516,0.00013020597,0.00008985492,0.00021681312,0.43787414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6864042,0.012080373,0.0026757447,0.026684416,0.0014178075,0.00011681885,0.000033884102,0.00032092773,0.27026573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905676,0.00042492084,0.000016641134,0.00011477848,0.00025030912,0.0001365641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918157,0.00041003214,0.000049571394,0.000033275675,0.00014417824,0.0001814644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011660435,0.0004022503,0.00024666096,0.0005288699,0.012722696,0.006185458,0.00073625206,0.0016463938,0.004706393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022085842,0.0003631917,0.00016145279,0.00041610163,0.008534415,0.004340768,0.0028896402,0.004941316,0.000596312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058966405,0.000061328465,0.001051787,0.00021420703,0.0000068037925,0.0014392226,0.759605,0.000039030507,0.0016329194,0.03368994,0.16443864,0.03776219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056513695,0.000035477908,0.002402917,0.0002500451,0.000008366955,0.0010033542,0.33449972,0.000065862936,0.00059459434,0.0023988688,0.65870553,0.000029475257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054299537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15927833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054299537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003065701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021561873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10796696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W348350583","doi":"","title":"Activating Exodus: The Art of Melissa Shiff","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative technology transfer and society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Israelites; Ridiculous; Hatred; Rhetoric; Art history; Art; Visual arts; Literature; History; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.04976097176022533,"score_gpt":0.25717809959567256,"score_spread":0.20741712783544725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W348350583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033875853,0.008585322,0.008723928,0.02382965,0.004504943,0.00006842295,0.000114396134,0.0005671605,0.91973037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.382022,0.003951872,0.006245677,0.00518031,0.00096781447,0.00008117077,0.00007937291,0.0005696871,0.60090196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995171,0.00017926136,0.000006283002,0.000053511612,0.00014443837,0.00009940689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997613,0.00010424562,0.000010393644,0.000022631293,0.000045160075,0.000056245353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007082938,0.00061413646,0.0001778962,0.0005879827,0.0057542366,0.0035735995,0.00051419315,0.00090390275,0.01710013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013749655,0.00016005899,0.00020901638,0.0002531139,0.0039002076,0.002124205,0.0022737894,0.0021355972,0.0027122884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001653191,0.00005508433,0.00063415064,0.00015790197,0.000007757581,0.0011345227,0.09228123,0.00015242783,0.0034059922,0.17152345,0.61057293,0.119909085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046382756,0.000012596147,0.00030587486,0.000091282054,0.0000022377747,0.00041428162,0.010825249,0.00013920404,0.00058354635,0.0031244415,0.9844892,0.0000075758117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012224681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040419374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01710013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021253373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010331519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057205617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W379228731","doi":"","title":"Rhetorical Faith: The Literary Hermeneutics of Stanley Fish by Phillip J. Donnelly (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Faith; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Hermeneutics; Philosophy; Theology; Linguistics; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.02614802905770421,"score_gpt":0.21796333360273215,"score_spread":0.19181530454502793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W379228731","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000745282,0.9596564,0.000079364305,0.036688708,0.0025756971,0.000001873567,0.000004156033,0.0000023562993,0.0009169981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033416883,0.9753866,0.00014678622,0.013769853,0.0054646377,0.000014754064,0.000010624775,0.000010691973,0.001854324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972216,0.0014722932,0.0001418181,0.00017023431,0.0008777101,0.000116359726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846638,0.010930226,0.0006801303,0.00027648197,0.002837411,0.0006119545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006336366,0.0008628392,0.0017539273,0.0046773497,0.002552369,0.0068277856,0.0013482776,0.0042173355,0.0024508366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019956734,0.00056890387,0.0003893588,0.006440494,0.012543001,0.0087978095,0.0030359942,0.00589974,0.0014340292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055059176,0.0000221299,0.00023236203,0.0051849056,0.000058641726,0.00015879842,0.0043070484,0.00012904113,0.000105393156,0.029418418,0.75480455,0.2055237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002073789,0.000024856105,0.0010268037,0.010595461,0.000040257502,0.00041299942,0.0025507922,0.000042357537,0.00007973792,0.013298965,0.97187895,0.0000279336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022339262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047204897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022339262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046862196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010327587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044418454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W39266853","doi":"10.7202/1071143ar","title":"A Taxonomy of Responses and Respondents to Literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Psychology; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.13626388008223436,"score_gpt":0.26469953282365827,"score_spread":0.1284356527414239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W39266853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6788437,0.0018231386,0.10981434,0.004550513,0.00040493082,0.006275011,0.007639886,0.0010253005,0.18962318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87582964,0.0027288473,0.0720497,0.0018695777,0.00013384793,0.011455382,0.009375606,0.00025421902,0.02630316],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94666094,0.03168929,0.006046213,0.0024329529,0.009851603,0.0033189903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323666,0.037435994,0.0057798885,0.004641572,0.017558957,0.0022169948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019805653,0.0009900098,0.0006722612,0.021024324,0.003292696,0.005696803,0.002262201,0.0036038822,0.011757914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08980834,0.000546584,0.0006398951,0.01694495,0.002374311,0.008066614,0.005849764,0.0015652693,0.00447727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005832849,0.00048680813,0.18804176,0.0028853859,0.000069451926,0.0017109127,0.40383285,0.0010843512,0.0088801645,0.10361845,0.016811255,0.27199543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044152875,0.0006517327,0.088168405,0.0022007532,0.000038722766,0.0023005207,0.6901968,0.004225434,0.0033686778,0.052564878,0.1560083,0.00023157152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014137002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011188878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021024324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024719927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023707536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10474354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W398826848","doi":"","title":"Commentary on Ripley","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Ideal (ethics); Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05720655181943424,"score_gpt":0.26252711928481737,"score_spread":0.20532056746538313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W398826848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004018593,0.0020812408,0.000060457074,0.94666034,0.049955565,0.000005259541,0.00003219504,0.0000130617855,0.0011517063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009255561,0.00097327086,0.00008994873,0.97415507,0.021228679,0.000032224,0.000011483555,0.00003962248,0.0025441812],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835279,0.0051439265,0.0013610064,0.0033863853,0.005357199,0.0012235515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9096588,0.059604567,0.0025443647,0.0028997166,0.020301254,0.004991311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020214844,0.0016613251,0.0034660168,0.0024831186,0.009761219,0.010508153,0.009340704,0.058619637,0.01231072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12792291,0.0014388072,0.0024043224,0.003264438,0.012629616,0.016564382,0.006426824,0.11426929,0.010663527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010107316,0.0000019550957,0.000015537744,0.00004227393,0.0000044414314,0.00006447842,0.00011151109,0.000010400902,0.00000909142,0.0018277331,0.9969887,0.00091371144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003036352,0.000012053576,0.00018637288,0.0007694498,0.000023705501,0.00027556345,0.00095597433,0.00007901615,0.00013052882,0.009142881,0.9883382,0.000055913355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015343878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020408062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058619637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099284705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013959642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10690755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40934222","doi":"10.1080/00335630209384392","title":"Review of: eloquence is power: Oratory and Performance in Early America by Sandra Gustafson","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); History; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02516308076230069,"score_gpt":0.20440446221496775,"score_spread":0.17924138145266705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40934222","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033635777,0.8923508,0.00008670679,0.08265446,0.01653995,0.000005827831,0.000059271613,0.000010610734,0.007956003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012007506,0.90250266,0.00015991983,0.030800704,0.034990318,0.000031120246,0.00010681086,0.000045305605,0.019355733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989479,0.00038411995,0.00007872239,0.00017601335,0.0002741593,0.00013906816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248946,0.0040536774,0.00039004307,0.00015470953,0.0024080602,0.0005040875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189518,0.0010882989,0.0016355996,0.0045458097,0.003009266,0.0059706634,0.0013723478,0.005437204,0.009034732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072407327,0.00053505506,0.00031162848,0.0062951166,0.0047363867,0.0068029617,0.002847737,0.0053343177,0.0034105044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027072678,0.000015902371,0.00021935593,0.0016753736,0.000010853859,0.000051873736,0.001802187,0.00005055392,0.00009252486,0.008801145,0.90598327,0.081269786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065211507,0.000010172191,0.0009108803,0.002682955,0.000016935108,0.00011449851,0.0016715333,0.000014484938,0.000033767672,0.0018581745,0.99266714,0.000013035817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035956923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07221777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035956923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037225715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007597804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071495235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41826288","doi":"","title":"Examining the ‘dark past’ and ‘hopeful future’ in representations of race and Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Commission; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.041861622005250766,"score_gpt":0.1968895502059533,"score_spread":0.15502792820070255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W41826288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037661735,0.006463067,0.0024317023,0.088208094,0.00085224333,0.00003841362,0.0000898099,0.00004731133,0.8642077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840716,0.0017270686,0.0010062335,0.005527262,0.00013905636,0.000044619206,0.000036160556,0.00013037375,0.10731767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931056,0.0028743735,0.00012689322,0.00045126432,0.0017858832,0.0016559896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917189,0.005073364,0.00031498185,0.0004107993,0.001516612,0.00096543966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006697341,0.00056484074,0.0006004491,0.0024214515,0.03880378,0.026763475,0.0025045304,0.0076833237,0.007948982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016519343,0.0005707124,0.0003382608,0.0047787973,0.06495038,0.009307493,0.006621873,0.014618815,0.00055779313],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006547186,0.0000039642014,0.00013077188,0.000017932764,0.0000023587725,0.00008577121,0.16465127,0.00008981788,0.00002565051,0.81444514,0.016348515,0.0041923756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010774395,0.0000074502773,0.0012246503,0.0003755908,0.000019516161,0.00013565362,0.24309161,0.00047429706,0.00020584896,0.21586666,0.53852624,0.00006174232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.925089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9554266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10431187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10431187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13614812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75683916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200112142","doi":"10.22230/src.2021v12n1a377","title":"Lecture 8: Hegemony and Rhetoric Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly and Research Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Hegemony; Humanities; Articulation (sociology); Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.10597360995736921,"score_gpt":0.3652512096321609,"score_spread":0.2592775996747917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200112142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013163615,0.045133226,0.043365385,0.24673598,0.0093891835,0.000041327166,0.00018106877,0.00021367917,0.6417766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61467457,0.02876362,0.017888537,0.017171124,0.010719316,0.00016322869,0.0001888287,0.00045815634,0.3099727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974342,0.0015847879,0.00004985465,0.00020875524,0.0005055914,0.00021692851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997015,0.0022571117,0.00012683257,0.00014376565,0.00031447154,0.00014281577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022632657,0.0005428588,0.00041057996,0.001386594,0.0031986544,0.006427905,0.0007555791,0.0018532773,0.017173875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005732415,0.00024144241,0.00055424345,0.0011027919,0.011173042,0.0062588183,0.002181483,0.0059783407,0.0022639656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000996127,0.000005660263,0.000055869692,0.000037018905,0.0000031712434,0.00003395455,0.0019367869,0.0001485809,0.0001312683,0.9703058,0.020768987,0.0065628625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061527353,0.000011336229,0.00020693218,0.00017503682,0.000005776753,0.000052334173,0.0023431054,0.0004973254,0.0003865733,0.7059091,0.2903967,0.000009591259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004167875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042264047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017173875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008072775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025782555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05857241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200112281","doi":"10.1177/13634593211064115","title":"Constituting good health citizenship through British Columbia’s COVID-19 public updates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Ethos; Public health; Political science; Rhetorical question; Moral responsibility; Public relations; Agency (philosophy); Social responsibility; Good citizenship; Sociology; Collective responsibility; Public administration; Law; Social science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.20682404710934077,"score_gpt":0.453907437775732,"score_spread":0.24708339066639123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200112281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2678691,0.0046092058,0.004726493,0.13626018,0.0009381993,0.00007094006,0.00013305893,0.0001559022,0.58523697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728655,0.0006342369,0.0007812333,0.004168442,0.000056974048,0.000020056843,0.00002427061,0.0000436274,0.021405518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929093,0.0036850912,0.00013627512,0.000433124,0.0017514576,0.0010847882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899777,0.0064206086,0.00044349756,0.00038855502,0.001966427,0.0008031289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006758606,0.0004441754,0.00030922238,0.0018178506,0.0292049,0.012260033,0.00090914173,0.0033328133,0.004047082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011563533,0.00033868806,0.00018384698,0.0019568605,0.025936184,0.0031624655,0.006090899,0.0059044682,0.00036640768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046711913,0.000026119878,0.0028295459,0.00013640037,0.000008752234,0.00062067935,0.6290682,0.00025341366,0.00088133995,0.3028883,0.031672757,0.03156781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015737889,0.000025511496,0.005461829,0.00056576956,0.000027825201,0.000241475,0.26594952,0.0007350626,0.0010318415,0.019838601,0.70602673,0.00008015038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8750958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91170263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124904215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07290283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054758273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206503452","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.13.2.01","title":"Kenneth Burke’s Dramatistic Pragmatism: A Missing Link between Classical Greek Scholarship and the Interactionist Study of Human Knowing and Acting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Symbolic interactionism; Sociology; Pragmatism; Rhetoric; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); The Symbolic; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; History; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.2729903233806681,"score_gpt":0.47360516849933154,"score_spread":0.20061484511866345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206503452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056192745,0.075223,0.035596542,0.40464908,0.005304528,0.000075546304,0.00007214628,0.00020424591,0.42268226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8869833,0.015322648,0.013559852,0.03258594,0.0014751097,0.0001645738,0.000032493,0.00016846723,0.049707677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443203,0.0036276227,0.00016310788,0.00056925684,0.0010313131,0.00017664851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954804,0.0029882884,0.00036956783,0.00049315876,0.0004569385,0.00021169029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037528295,0.0004331079,0.0005142598,0.0011751418,0.0038494382,0.0060146605,0.0008293556,0.0036026991,0.0019760733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011050232,0.00020868302,0.0001985608,0.0010335221,0.034223095,0.0078112967,0.0039888476,0.005086592,0.00081767485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012294431,0.000015091648,0.00009964792,0.0000744922,0.0000030718816,0.00007478211,0.030823437,0.00009014346,0.00017788475,0.9499718,0.009339619,0.009317895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012706919,0.000017586377,0.00024094289,0.0004678912,0.0000037941334,0.00026531614,0.010595474,0.00026847995,0.00033167712,0.66917396,0.31860292,0.000019277095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018202974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016970889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060146605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028438738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031751886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020633817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206809120","doi":"10.1080/02773940409391297","title":"Reviews","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Logos Bible Software; Power (physics); State (computer science); Rhetoric; Identity (music); Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05384353033119784,"score_gpt":0.26296279256102106,"score_spread":0.20911926222982322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206809120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006617567,0.3607403,0.002541766,0.040828295,0.06332547,0.00030866556,0.006255592,0.0011737455,0.5241644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005760571,0.27055833,0.003023732,0.026438875,0.026242038,0.00034581192,0.0076544797,0.00073157996,0.65924454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979354,0.00030495954,0.00017782282,0.00037628095,0.0010328856,0.00017268282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967373,0.00065724266,0.0002086858,0.00035865788,0.0016027138,0.00043541376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012021988,0.001087877,0.0013548783,0.0035606613,0.0011965225,0.005842464,0.0026631749,0.003203686,0.36980358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067099053,0.00042654562,0.0008324403,0.003427429,0.0010512938,0.0041507,0.0026275883,0.0023257989,0.28652787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027329845,0.00002136192,0.000079588295,0.001279897,0.0000103343145,0.000089936184,0.00009551159,0.000045777084,0.00017051012,0.0058459225,0.8494023,0.14293155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024202302,0.0000042056918,0.000072544964,0.0003599553,0.000002744199,0.00006704426,0.000029789806,0.0000045151087,0.000021483307,0.0007278512,0.99870527,0.0000022619756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028941678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004437505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63019645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023416914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047864504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206999097","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14653959.v1","title":"Thickening the Public Realm: Choreographing the Interaction of the Public Realm with the Built Environment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Public space; Vitality; Architectural engineering; Public sphere; Pedestrian; Public domain; Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Public relations; Civil engineering; Engineering; Art; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.08371527945605246,"score_gpt":0.2522151063646522,"score_spread":0.16849982690859977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206999097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2266547,0.0039073383,0.030171586,0.016510163,0.0005623729,0.00010723938,0.00009776798,0.00019494936,0.72179383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814633,0.00067115173,0.0032825808,0.00038433602,0.00008124666,0.00003890525,0.000025531846,0.00011123492,0.013941703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977582,0.0017133446,0.000027747246,0.00012864223,0.0001728581,0.00019932594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775785,0.0016343798,0.0001381762,0.000252324,0.00008292475,0.00013433176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027370034,0.00043318034,0.000271603,0.0019474687,0.009709549,0.010284937,0.0006840967,0.0018036377,0.0049746237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036969257,0.0002921272,0.00037787523,0.0015457107,0.04417561,0.011097323,0.007826679,0.0035936846,0.0004892036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020572445,0.000010620006,0.00056161056,0.000057265755,0.0000033009146,0.00029760637,0.33353788,0.00019602105,0.0006609412,0.65670806,0.0021194264,0.0058267275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024274046,0.000059860082,0.0023324795,0.0004940026,0.000027176178,0.00059543486,0.3906944,0.0009853916,0.0014939234,0.2125448,0.39070907,0.000039157516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007078255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010291773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010284937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038588517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022412103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02799803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210497166","doi":"10.21900/j.median.v18i1.850","title":"Runaway Slave Portraiture, Aesthetic Culture, and the Emergence of Racial Sense","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Media-N","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Emily Carr University of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Reading (process); Racial formation theory; Racial profiling; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Newspaper; Perception; Sense of place; Racism; Race (biology); Art; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Media studies; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.024109371187064455,"score_gpt":0.21636702069680908,"score_spread":0.1922576495097446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210497166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3941018,0.0031048995,0.0048792516,0.016783243,0.00047405754,0.000012732118,0.000018081533,0.000047818103,0.580578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993826,0.00022713693,0.0003003754,0.00035296858,0.00006722906,0.000004989186,0.0000030005558,0.000020994185,0.005197258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979898,0.0012906074,0.000036684305,0.00019344613,0.00031519475,0.00017437944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801517,0.0012207644,0.00027536135,0.00022696862,0.00012694541,0.00013489343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027288522,0.00029291754,0.00025682003,0.0012677484,0.0088177705,0.0061318353,0.00050999824,0.0014833043,0.0030993302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004572475,0.00022541161,0.0001699121,0.00084582635,0.041779112,0.0059687817,0.0045771636,0.0031199167,0.00019476874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015804344,0.000011092651,0.0007529186,0.000033581317,0.0000026752573,0.0002192184,0.36403176,0.00003514375,0.00053996686,0.62769294,0.001846645,0.004818125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024615383,0.000078209625,0.005692105,0.0003444566,0.000020428755,0.0013188754,0.42421556,0.00053075526,0.0016069382,0.29529586,0.2708242,0.000047985264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002013904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038027614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0088177705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020753834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087129173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0150581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210788788","doi":"10.1515/sem-2019-0085","title":"A Lotmanian semiotic interpretation of cultural memory in ritual","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semiotica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Semiotics; Cultural memory; Context (archaeology); Symbol (formal); Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Meaning (existential); Semiotics of culture; Construct (python library); Aesthetics; Collective memory; Linguistics; Epistemology; Psychology; Anthropology; History; Computer science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03114049452572071,"score_gpt":0.2549322747846003,"score_spread":0.22379178025887958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210788788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1069121,0.006314643,0.14425786,0.008247254,0.00072387967,0.00010765853,0.0001919739,0.00016638976,0.73307824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742397,0.000766918,0.011136207,0.00037918246,0.00017836658,0.00006710867,0.000049937604,0.000040442632,0.013142185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985453,0.001009652,0.00005176295,0.0001154433,0.00016161219,0.0001161525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914026,0.0004141441,0.00008812588,0.00012985837,0.00015625564,0.00007127095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017190948,0.00039416942,0.00030074277,0.0016557408,0.002349489,0.005055847,0.0007768054,0.0010920902,0.0042764437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020471204,0.00017168741,0.0004728096,0.0008302326,0.022162247,0.005397492,0.0026999845,0.0013648883,0.0004308016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011832955,0.0000034117538,0.00006467691,0.00002761649,0.0000018813466,0.00006441517,0.007855709,0.000113993825,0.00017544026,0.98953944,0.000374214,0.0017673651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022531336,0.000045876597,0.0005731494,0.00015029794,0.000012708103,0.0005037391,0.0150057925,0.0026161158,0.00078360486,0.89127624,0.08898347,0.000026440408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016375266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013533895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005055847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020713906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008282867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015029073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211000642","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14658003","title":"The (un)sustainable game: An exploration of rhetorical strategies and risk communication in sustainable seafood campaigns","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Framing (construction); Business; Credibility; Social marketing; Certification; Sustainable products; Sustainable consumption; Marketing; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.07901618139248315,"score_gpt":0.29444537488128325,"score_spread":0.2154291934888001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211000642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42080516,0.0071031605,0.014120523,0.022498488,0.00030103704,0.00014454678,0.00007031894,0.000048375012,0.5349084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894553,0.0013883157,0.0017523798,0.0009477053,0.00009600523,0.0000646917,0.000018318655,0.000031504984,0.006245771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934141,0.00530911,0.00007999703,0.0002140895,0.0006633533,0.0003192459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970595,0.02673391,0.0012675045,0.00035257652,0.0006570157,0.0003939712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009251425,0.00054229685,0.0003074214,0.0030228556,0.0045463834,0.012133439,0.000878766,0.0020273603,0.0045735193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016188065,0.00031378993,0.0002623286,0.0021798282,0.016516492,0.012089622,0.003567216,0.0028166345,0.00034900097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008556969,0.00019333829,0.0035589987,0.0003559313,0.00001721418,0.00044926052,0.39550585,0.0003268306,0.00068725157,0.56670105,0.0024457187,0.029672993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081766186,0.0002289801,0.01430661,0.0016375742,0.000056133973,0.0005528592,0.60037297,0.0039217332,0.0015814174,0.22449283,0.15270597,0.0000612262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004379192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00541342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012133439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057800026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031945866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04892683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211076967","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14655993","title":"The Politics of Media and 9/11","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Terrorism; Adversary; News media; Politics; Media coverage; Political science; Media studies; Media event; Media bias; Media relations; Mass media; Advertising; Public relations; Sociology; Law; History; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.08733004600139371,"score_gpt":0.2675925959321395,"score_spread":0.1802625499307458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211076967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016895998,0.004276669,0.0015166625,0.05292737,0.0012673049,0.000017101216,0.000091910304,0.000046048397,0.922961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80136603,0.0038531632,0.0012065343,0.01108539,0.0022740061,0.00007428221,0.000078009776,0.00024429196,0.1798184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288636,0.0043603745,0.000148282,0.0006819797,0.0010061677,0.0009168088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942327,0.0036535403,0.00050892757,0.0004506134,0.0005164402,0.0006377799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005997654,0.000555638,0.00029485085,0.0024684395,0.010978236,0.020849138,0.00086890033,0.0038431005,0.024301676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067379903,0.00036004218,0.00040592576,0.0020102933,0.02401249,0.011844841,0.006552074,0.0069764266,0.0032415758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021252517,0.000013576974,0.00030901638,0.00003922649,0.0000028608492,0.000086453765,0.012479452,0.000024371291,0.00010924612,0.9656848,0.014886234,0.0063435114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015903765,0.00002903449,0.0013791482,0.0003773043,0.000007286157,0.00018685864,0.015921293,0.00012183082,0.0007954912,0.0779637,0.9031786,0.000023605528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008020559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008292328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024301676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007822703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002821986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08129722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211200075","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14658003.v1","title":"The (un)sustainable game: An exploration of rhetorical strategies and risk communication in sustainable seafood campaigns","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Framing (construction); Credibility; Certification; Social marketing; Sustainable products; Marketing; Sustainable consumption; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Geography; Political science; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.07901618139248315,"score_gpt":0.29444537488128325,"score_spread":0.2154291934888001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211200075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42080516,0.0071031605,0.014120523,0.022498488,0.00030103704,0.00014454678,0.00007031894,0.000048375012,0.5349084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894553,0.0013883157,0.0017523798,0.0009477053,0.00009600523,0.0000646917,0.000018318655,0.000031504984,0.006245771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934141,0.00530911,0.00007999703,0.0002140895,0.0006633533,0.0003192459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970595,0.02673391,0.0012675045,0.00035257652,0.0006570157,0.0003939712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009251425,0.00054229685,0.0003074214,0.0030228556,0.0045463834,0.012133439,0.000878766,0.0020273603,0.0045735193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016188065,0.00031378993,0.0002623286,0.0021798282,0.016516492,0.012089622,0.003567216,0.0028166345,0.00034900097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008556969,0.00019333829,0.0035589987,0.0003559313,0.00001721418,0.00044926052,0.39550585,0.0003268306,0.00068725157,0.56670105,0.0024457187,0.029672993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081766186,0.0002289801,0.01430661,0.0016375742,0.000056133973,0.0005528592,0.60037297,0.0039217332,0.0015814174,0.22449283,0.15270597,0.0000612262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004379192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00541342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012133439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057800026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031945866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04892683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213254138","doi":"10.31468/dwr.899","title":"Reinventing (with) Theory in Rhetoric and Writing Studies: Essays in Honor of Sharon Crowley. Andrea Alden, Kendall Gerdes, Judy Holiday, &amp; Ryan Skinnell (Eds.). Utah State University Press, 2019","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; History; Art history; Computer science","score_opus":0.1184654846007926,"score_gpt":0.34722790102430473,"score_spread":0.22876241642351214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213254138","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002442544,0.63225526,0.0022254267,0.296039,0.029432235,0.000020785157,0.000027183722,0.000044638076,0.0375129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13938454,0.61013967,0.008458945,0.060463518,0.070267655,0.00024070257,0.00015884076,0.00027837354,0.1106078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99327904,0.004617324,0.00022879348,0.00043079726,0.0011798613,0.00026423048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97578806,0.019623095,0.00082318916,0.00069488556,0.0020076225,0.0010630821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010707472,0.00095252704,0.0008685125,0.0021957417,0.0042762673,0.010208472,0.0012155495,0.004264163,0.004861988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015612759,0.00048538615,0.00037400058,0.002088472,0.016031306,0.015289847,0.0056211664,0.0076280544,0.002193403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004671367,0.00007449909,0.000303528,0.00072310807,0.000018100034,0.00016235051,0.019627307,0.00014067105,0.00034275532,0.10208873,0.6820923,0.19437996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010846532,0.000019917092,0.0005447653,0.0017654588,0.000009741982,0.0001467668,0.009159643,0.00007319941,0.00015362602,0.052731477,0.93536556,0.000019066054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033694443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056499154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010707472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003796825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053403876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056627154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220884481","doi":"10.1386/eme_00116_1","title":"Two cheers for literacy: Walter Ong, President Trump and the literate mind","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Explorations in Media Ecology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Rhetoric; Literacy; Political rhetoric; Political philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Political science; Theology; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.05210941054033698,"score_gpt":0.2913825225379447,"score_spread":0.23927311199760776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220884481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006171677,0.029232554,0.0004887327,0.945631,0.0067576743,0.0000062801996,0.000017314656,0.000016619233,0.011678152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33022484,0.050600078,0.0025041525,0.5000024,0.01986233,0.00007516051,0.000063560066,0.00015082657,0.09651674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841166,0.0008260495,0.00003766318,0.0001688301,0.00035680115,0.00019897221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502414,0.0037661954,0.00022977433,0.00008620113,0.00033775604,0.0005559407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021126694,0.00037015785,0.00040272568,0.000989099,0.0044791917,0.0042713587,0.0005799419,0.0043813735,0.003511625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008207473,0.00025180206,0.00020099976,0.0007307101,0.0064747958,0.0072613717,0.0021941867,0.010441135,0.000747349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054427222,0.0000477891,0.0016816943,0.00014396047,0.0000142974195,0.000346639,0.013697677,0.00006921054,0.00029666573,0.16790955,0.7804591,0.03527897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017670513,0.000036285037,0.0015940369,0.00058459025,0.000012089252,0.0005448243,0.013265443,0.00019661222,0.00051990716,0.082253546,0.90092266,0.000052418352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031163606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007249948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044791917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002108645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01529938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229914274","doi":"10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecr061","title":"Rhetoric in North America: Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The International Encyclopedia of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Diversity (politics); Politics; Composition (language); Phenomenon; Subject (documents); Categorization; Sociology; Curriculum; Political rhetoric; Media studies; Social science; Political science; History; Pedagogy; Literature; Library science; Law; Epistemology; Anthropology; Art; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02113950965943389,"score_gpt":0.22724126761631494,"score_spread":0.20610175795688104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229914274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16154718,0.047431547,0.0005483894,0.06438118,0.00089598075,0.000110140536,0.0040499084,0.00022386728,0.7208117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73194987,0.035000626,0.0012441756,0.010489127,0.00024241467,0.00007703815,0.0015917597,0.00015963362,0.2192453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821585,0.00011421026,0.00005170078,0.0002012482,0.00075131963,0.00066569325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935847,0.0007836208,0.00033846768,0.00008582731,0.003283072,0.0019242732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092311285,0.00025788246,0.00039946,0.004460308,0.019313794,0.0075247874,0.0010933664,0.0012254443,0.01872828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036506809,0.0002601594,0.00024639253,0.011662747,0.003864485,0.0013103393,0.001925268,0.002016763,0.0013691722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010978333,0.00012303384,0.03413397,0.00092415937,0.00003160578,0.0015435028,0.082415074,0.0003982734,0.00083633576,0.22726929,0.4131239,0.23909108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011478275,0.000009886308,0.053393442,0.00033014052,0.000012357285,0.00017436083,0.025128992,0.00011668547,0.00017195367,0.002107554,0.91850704,0.000036089437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99589145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124883704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.124883704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25288928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90609896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230107506","doi":"10.1177/1532708609348578","title":"Secret Muslims","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; Presidential system; Narrative; CLIPS; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics; Literature; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.33576788836717414,"score_gpt":0.45328515532839586,"score_spread":0.11751726696122172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230107506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44006756,0.0011680577,0.003159174,0.01889922,0.0019316147,0.00005756222,0.00009749983,0.000038940485,0.5345803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748487,0.0003168758,0.00036606097,0.0015117985,0.00017038929,0.000013331481,0.000031226686,0.000014466576,0.022727152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993099,0.0003027325,0.000024888548,0.00007414866,0.00015538323,0.00013293218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990138,0.00044512298,0.00021268897,0.00008196232,0.00010310708,0.00014325119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010659255,0.00022944609,0.00012332459,0.0003559795,0.0053034793,0.0023105391,0.0002714153,0.0009506589,0.0091006635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003376529,0.00012186068,0.0001026724,0.00025176175,0.0045434083,0.0019723368,0.0024218524,0.0022421745,0.0010825709],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019984547,0.0000752943,0.0061345557,0.00017986186,0.00001146211,0.0010268722,0.27409595,0.000086561275,0.0034298494,0.6584872,0.02396523,0.032307364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029977651,0.00012819265,0.008026374,0.00033477368,0.000025119702,0.0009280615,0.24736404,0.0003998633,0.003575835,0.0352379,0.703918,0.000031915304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030362858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091006635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009930218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063178455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0304448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231371256","doi":"10.1017/9781108348218.007","title":"“Hard Words and Rhetoricall Phrases”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Natural language processing; History; Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06056582285151457,"score_gpt":0.20862612261502625,"score_spread":0.14806029976351168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231371256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004372151,0.032607537,0.0133963125,0.016365012,0.0027804286,0.000028532459,0.00012952292,0.000118469994,0.930202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3343671,0.017737262,0.006961015,0.005999806,0.0073971865,0.00020711256,0.00037663634,0.0007607871,0.6261931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819845,0.0011236983,0.000058267047,0.00013354451,0.00037181342,0.000114126604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813265,0.001294362,0.00010310292,0.00016105101,0.00021930902,0.000089536035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013008317,0.0010881838,0.00054092106,0.0034616613,0.003132457,0.010777631,0.0009415236,0.0026092848,0.030356953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004633732,0.0004052764,0.00020166337,0.0028963292,0.013482304,0.012081909,0.002748861,0.004673586,0.00809844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007632857,0.0000061677088,0.00002686412,0.000088947534,0.0000013389343,0.000022750977,0.0040817712,0.00001990137,0.00015480375,0.95408595,0.027922627,0.0135813635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011146647,0.000011407902,0.00019851717,0.00037573898,0.000003726221,0.00012814507,0.0028530222,0.0001741055,0.00032781102,0.37325203,0.6226542,0.000010168388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011933589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001978098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030356953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00263429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013445133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101554096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231639837","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.23.2.0121","title":"The Loudspeaker and the Little Man: Mass Media and Democratic Participation in the Federal Theatre Project’s <i>One-Third of a Nation</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Democracy; Media studies; Narrative; Rhetoric; Sociology; Mass media; Politics; Political science; Law; Literature; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10472072668492775,"score_gpt":0.27328400385844503,"score_spread":0.16856327717351727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231639837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6397689,0.0024424884,0.002749791,0.074763246,0.0016660267,0.000082024715,0.000081497456,0.00010398267,0.2783421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98074293,0.00034916357,0.00027380715,0.0032353387,0.00021836911,0.00004902542,0.000016627997,0.000052611296,0.0150620965],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904514,0.008455321,0.00010956075,0.00045546205,0.0007862672,0.0011482842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98968387,0.0061234287,0.0010643573,0.0004098279,0.0005692847,0.002149167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160126,0.0005737213,0.0002860315,0.0013781617,0.027244903,0.013694159,0.0014388326,0.0033202353,0.008286072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009197622,0.0004997291,0.00028815196,0.00069020625,0.02258116,0.006305855,0.010606461,0.007261403,0.000907063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007206067,0.00014113491,0.0025661457,0.0000901973,0.0000101544865,0.0007719964,0.9039073,0.0000400292,0.0009750762,0.050873037,0.025005838,0.015546962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016191143,0.00008324894,0.003082089,0.00026950546,0.000010857133,0.0003553508,0.77073216,0.00014077114,0.0008592915,0.0040221945,0.22039571,0.000032707005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011966283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024673551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027244903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062686517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030083635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045482457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231728321","doi":"10.22215/etd/2013-09685","title":"Beautiful &amp; ambiguous news : an aesthetic approach to the limits of discursive \"truth\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.08807108886510186,"score_gpt":0.2933969119491886,"score_spread":0.20532582308408676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231728321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016845232,0.0037793997,0.033773743,0.033353776,0.0008062242,0.000041402647,0.000052800435,0.000115784635,0.91123164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228787,0.001744765,0.01157225,0.0025727039,0.0010513688,0.00013284938,0.000040457388,0.000238965,0.05976793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926011,0.0049624224,0.0001794749,0.00043371483,0.0014233037,0.00039987054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987143,0.008993096,0.00094099774,0.001422384,0.0009556987,0.00054488203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007018133,0.0006157667,0.00036862495,0.004431619,0.009260525,0.022209588,0.0018360453,0.0039462424,0.007715218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014762392,0.0004166748,0.00044460344,0.0024051263,0.06305859,0.01342432,0.0063653584,0.0055573382,0.0009137122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008777194,0.0000039258234,0.000057978123,0.000029292714,0.000001292624,0.000049876464,0.018450066,0.000054281943,0.00009958796,0.9754301,0.0020714013,0.0037434348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020017955,0.00002043689,0.0003970488,0.0002799751,0.000015076274,0.00042874995,0.029456584,0.00076597056,0.0007225726,0.72240776,0.24546628,0.000019583016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002273134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038795148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022209588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058656083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032039192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042558134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231835419","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.19.1.0115","title":"The Rhetoric of Pregnancy. By Marika Seigel. Foreword by Jane Pincus","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric and Public Affairs","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Icon; Citation; State (computer science); Download; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; World Wide Web; Computer science; Philosophy; Algorithm; Theology","score_opus":0.021327573636317754,"score_gpt":0.21656238308580056,"score_spread":0.1952348094494828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231835419","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071051465,0.87356573,0.00024256176,0.07161939,0.020419031,0.000011797083,0.00009176356,0.000051263356,0.03392749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040015383,0.7295274,0.00036340705,0.058635842,0.027647132,0.00006845651,0.00022186172,0.00015440927,0.17937994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989122,0.00031904635,0.00006443337,0.00014710653,0.00047097396,0.00008625938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979594,0.0011158544,0.0001826817,0.00005576506,0.00050863525,0.00017773858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00124546,0.0012614742,0.0008698352,0.0029253408,0.0013678812,0.0042592497,0.0012444385,0.0029635925,0.04146034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064896895,0.00064007234,0.00062916195,0.0028989273,0.002699702,0.005696077,0.0017822024,0.0069105695,0.038635764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005937093,0.000002571729,0.00001862178,0.0002296116,0.000002391368,0.000014478446,0.00013058793,0.00001087953,0.00002442207,0.0036633948,0.96986157,0.026035594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018170148,0.0000033024173,0.00008425884,0.00086428627,0.0000027461524,0.00008747632,0.00011946691,0.0000058598716,0.000019701713,0.0014246369,0.99738234,0.0000040358855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068862066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009755938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04146034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033378934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041506523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13869864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232167357","doi":"10.3138/cras.40.2.163","title":"Brutal Honesty? The Uses of Gore in Tribal-Warrior and Gangbanger Autobiography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Biography; Objectivity (philosophy); Tribe; Face (sociological concept); History; Flesh; Literature; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Anthropology; Epistemology; Theology; Biology","score_opus":0.03249452032887689,"score_gpt":0.2849075400426128,"score_spread":0.2524130197137359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232167357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3084606,0.075537756,0.002364377,0.102956116,0.0020753408,0.00004784666,0.00008619539,0.000093441166,0.5083784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710556,0.008198709,0.0003381871,0.0028369306,0.00025340472,0.000014469007,0.000018666306,0.000038246242,0.01724579],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961802,0.0028432882,0.000076961645,0.00017227604,0.0004960998,0.00023119219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990338,0.007514507,0.00071218284,0.00048192288,0.0006391995,0.0003140535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048004785,0.0003099337,0.0003642194,0.0029191694,0.0079922015,0.006121444,0.000669346,0.0018616944,0.004173281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00883517,0.00022798874,0.000098718556,0.0022681959,0.025940243,0.005638288,0.0027814487,0.00330061,0.0005135552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023191038,0.000023259741,0.0009240387,0.00024332464,0.000008485578,0.0006641506,0.7490916,0.000025785013,0.0003182951,0.21074018,0.019917393,0.018020345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007838409,0.000021338525,0.003420004,0.0010732858,0.00001443684,0.0009974629,0.40164995,0.0000863781,0.00056841853,0.013908413,0.5782331,0.0000194006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014463939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03993248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014463939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031658527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034785986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232681776","doi":"10.4324/9781003035268-12","title":"Epistemic injustice in a settler nation: Canada’s history of erasing, silencing, marginalizing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.08646405431140805,"score_gpt":0.20699526211674743,"score_spread":0.12053120780533938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232681776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13930221,0.0148793245,0.0035115676,0.060113937,0.0009496471,0.00005792017,0.00015311626,0.0001131234,0.7809191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90511405,0.0046233432,0.00092602544,0.0048219874,0.000095502306,0.00002200163,0.000056623245,0.00008303424,0.08425747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970799,0.00061085814,0.00004395604,0.0002607044,0.0010555866,0.0009489612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726236,0.0012571152,0.0001220057,0.00017746173,0.00077558233,0.00040546732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002315417,0.00033062676,0.00042510216,0.0016398997,0.04608953,0.012135862,0.0016551197,0.0029912302,0.0037732746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047198697,0.00023386096,0.00024933665,0.0029468532,0.040777117,0.0030288626,0.0043605207,0.0062934617,0.00023736402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013534684,0.000011010926,0.0009658764,0.00007138003,0.0000049596256,0.00074906537,0.3225232,0.00015188231,0.00018818387,0.6347141,0.020298243,0.020308418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006629051,0.000013706976,0.003184244,0.0004019193,0.000017510603,0.00050510385,0.17634869,0.00027621773,0.00045196456,0.028983831,0.78975165,0.000058567173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99164915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95391047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11358492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15045728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82412016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233218468","doi":"10.1080/00958964.2021.1885916","title":"Correction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Environmental Education","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.020612677553518376,"score_gpt":0.2328595520378209,"score_spread":0.21224687448430254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233218468","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018761995,0.0008325169,0.0002991675,0.10538229,0.87705994,0.0000296014,0.0013012171,0.00028960354,0.014618067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018318268,0.00407587,0.0015187799,0.14885145,0.2526072,0.0002535216,0.0021928344,0.001371246,0.5708109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937157,0.00086067297,0.00058292336,0.0009162768,0.0031459255,0.00077848334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95070153,0.009163014,0.001741306,0.0033823254,0.033413768,0.0015979641],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003612404,0.0012377341,0.0011747093,0.0046604467,0.0064494833,0.0070141195,0.0035258285,0.0073669273,0.09739499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07401947,0.00061846105,0.0010399177,0.0037946198,0.0034202083,0.0029951932,0.0029232483,0.010655472,0.04706821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055462806,0.0000015520912,0.000025757954,0.000033601882,0.0000022593008,0.0000348546,0.00009872516,0.000006550734,0.000012177725,0.0012276205,0.9965581,0.0019931614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055969804,0.0000030494107,0.00029900766,0.0001421032,0.000006393519,0.000043828535,0.0002041528,0.000025945315,0.00006208047,0.0005353892,0.9986614,0.000011055062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10678837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110475324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.902605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007550803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013167662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233494454","doi":"10.4000/communication.4827","title":"Jonathan POTTER (1996), Representing Reality. Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sociology; Social reality; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08073940176762595,"score_gpt":0.3049610524294307,"score_spread":0.22422165066180477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233494454","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039524836,0.678434,0.016982043,0.12351218,0.0031974597,0.000108731816,0.00033402155,0.00014427172,0.17333485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1864144,0.68789774,0.01259496,0.024095813,0.0029741488,0.0004283624,0.00034283503,0.00031163672,0.0849401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984503,0.00084111246,0.00009602477,0.00019646676,0.00032267146,0.00009339689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744403,0.0018319881,0.000218147,0.00011312861,0.0002596981,0.00013294553],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028839002,0.0017048491,0.00065869215,0.0032183607,0.0042335247,0.008728927,0.0017954004,0.004852817,0.007218138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004692233,0.0008360453,0.0004631794,0.006008637,0.008897299,0.021882685,0.0027260003,0.0050526364,0.0031642804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007551408,0.000079112426,0.000970629,0.0016745969,0.000053500953,0.00043265798,0.043882243,0.0003510708,0.0003000818,0.6711279,0.20412238,0.07693029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003359403,0.000026637663,0.0018435578,0.0018784364,0.00003888782,0.0005676199,0.013094074,0.00019654883,0.0004462465,0.40088356,0.5809575,0.00003332294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009013198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011758257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99576646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003846786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003573357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027910471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233981640","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14644404","title":"Campaigning in the time of Twitter: 140 character ethical appeals from the 2012 United States presidential election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Credibility; Presidential system; Politics; Social media; Political science; Presidential election; Rhetoric; Media studies; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0566377134651424,"score_gpt":0.281568996046768,"score_spread":0.2249312825816256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233981640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98314226,0.00026649644,0.00018229616,0.002377201,0.00013766039,0.000022203496,0.0003453575,0.000010167934,0.013516413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927573,0.0004811332,0.00025073424,0.00090930087,0.00030116845,0.00005741365,0.00053488667,0.000037779326,0.0046703196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894375,0.00044518177,0.000061433464,0.00008069903,0.00030117878,0.00016774847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573684,0.002613883,0.00060312665,0.00012040247,0.0006455063,0.00028030397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012937499,0.00023406954,0.00024024922,0.00202679,0.004197998,0.0032023524,0.00021215828,0.0010357591,0.0026338552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008163157,0.00021423126,0.00015651005,0.0021856949,0.0012354607,0.0024681392,0.0018464494,0.0013259939,0.00072603737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006704243,0.00028382964,0.19365892,0.0004923964,0.000053262076,0.0036020253,0.68691474,0.00019504693,0.008016622,0.0074423924,0.031066012,0.06760427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000161418,0.00009362033,0.3983351,0.0002211858,0.000036721383,0.000669745,0.48602772,0.00076434476,0.0015062875,0.0012254518,0.11102737,0.00007636223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090092635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028805343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090092635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012350943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049392175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01791364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234677774","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661753.v1","title":"Ethnographic journalism and the American urban crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Sociology; Underclass; Prejudice (legal term); Journalism; Empathy; Gentrification; Scholarship; Media studies; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.057252020302790065,"score_gpt":0.2768229341584163,"score_spread":0.21957091385562624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234677774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44452795,0.018837463,0.0025988114,0.12978372,0.0017784974,0.00006099221,0.00020023165,0.000113919115,0.40209842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824025,0.0056641093,0.0006464925,0.0033034363,0.0010212314,0.00007828921,0.000037364673,0.00004986413,0.0067968466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99015146,0.0083703995,0.00019544455,0.00032916994,0.00054920214,0.00040424513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466538,0.04709163,0.002354904,0.001432265,0.0012077116,0.0012595858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009377588,0.00035088873,0.00032159564,0.006809498,0.013794834,0.011998664,0.00067655626,0.002183297,0.0040386873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016777748,0.00032839982,0.00012852691,0.006332197,0.03228286,0.008228459,0.0067114113,0.0023324026,0.00026282403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045049066,0.0000550093,0.0045433473,0.00022750004,0.000008735267,0.00071435457,0.62857366,0.00006884936,0.00037821423,0.33017534,0.016776972,0.018432971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025766618,0.00002654689,0.0041975854,0.00048140358,0.000011424841,0.0005185966,0.6584119,0.00014686788,0.00047340052,0.053624805,0.28206417,0.000017554506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005319754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008751016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013794834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005115947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024945352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049593985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234834008","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14646597.v1","title":"Come Fly With Me: Analyzing The F-35 Aircraft Acquisition Discourse to Study Incivility in Question Period","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incivility; Politics; Period (music); Ideology; Rhetoric; Political communication; Sociology; Media studies; Accountability; Political science; Government (linguistics); Social science; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.038324005461900165,"score_gpt":0.3082875254160106,"score_spread":0.26996351995411044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234834008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614577,0.0018668565,0.006181304,0.010531678,0.00013425377,0.00010775184,0.00023732586,0.00004723874,0.119435966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487597,0.00027625344,0.0007203915,0.0003386255,0.000038660168,0.000038426315,0.000075562464,0.000039708386,0.0035964777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260885,0.0049012317,0.00019444716,0.0005062888,0.0010686254,0.00072053773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96883976,0.026354037,0.0018042236,0.0008895529,0.0015338804,0.0005785158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086100185,0.00036210765,0.00040761856,0.003234573,0.010220003,0.012136651,0.0009098146,0.0022483177,0.0036129684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147004,0.0002881116,0.00025872522,0.0037103272,0.02177339,0.007749,0.0057379403,0.0034909737,0.0004405483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003961322,0.000013278602,0.002094769,0.000058630587,0.0000029157036,0.00022233647,0.9423429,0.000043317945,0.00092325645,0.049283,0.0006059037,0.0043701017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067331225,0.000024238167,0.0073428224,0.00025023325,0.000009244783,0.00017790927,0.918356,0.00030531976,0.0012237226,0.009106181,0.0631796,0.000017997578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03770022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033252206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96229976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014111583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049642376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10238719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234890077","doi":"10.1353/mdr.2005.0020","title":"\"Loyal to the Truth\": Gary Mitchell's Aesthetic Loyalism in As the Beast Sleeps and The Force of Change","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Aesthetics; Literature","score_opus":0.05448902319219815,"score_gpt":0.2495977816574379,"score_spread":0.19510875846523976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234890077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038671818,0.011378701,0.0030183669,0.5561913,0.0064857197,0.000033236534,0.00003521597,0.000131021,0.38405454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87757117,0.002698434,0.0011791526,0.043669917,0.0034007286,0.000053735163,0.0000160238,0.00029046653,0.07112033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952277,0.0030288142,0.0000664182,0.00034091843,0.0006332573,0.00070284767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947206,0.0033392985,0.00040106007,0.0003417169,0.0004486,0.0007487667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004363811,0.00052217924,0.00054679665,0.0011967915,0.024430957,0.01172403,0.0015202493,0.007890543,0.0049923975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011562956,0.00036249158,0.00030207296,0.0010750679,0.05299307,0.011106266,0.005666482,0.0182656,0.00082681724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028061706,0.000020097608,0.0001616658,0.000043771925,0.0000039756637,0.00021295606,0.19678555,0.000034851957,0.00012232397,0.72615707,0.07030142,0.006128233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000258446,0.00003895253,0.0006307566,0.00037784185,0.000016471784,0.0005468378,0.14953957,0.00021335526,0.0003823449,0.2561535,0.5920336,0.00004093847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018150885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033435233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024430957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005201686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003959435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037741005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234925516","doi":"10.3138/cras-s035-01-02","title":"Uncontainable Metaphor: George F. Kennan’s ‘‘X’’ Article and Cold War Discourse1","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Object (grammar); Meaning (existential); Event (particle physics); Philosophy; Contradiction; George (robot); Irony; Literature; Literal and figurative language; Interpretation (philosophy); Poetry; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Linguistics; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.03411515013378161,"score_gpt":0.28675655627000446,"score_spread":0.2526414061362229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234925516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0143294055,0.12916017,0.0020848496,0.4198653,0.0074503603,0.000027194948,0.00007718174,0.000046388326,0.4269591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5598548,0.030403642,0.0019773736,0.18819954,0.004877259,0.00017487377,0.00007808446,0.00019366846,0.21424071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697626,0.002070375,0.00002996321,0.00023637647,0.00037919896,0.00030775135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990971,0.00058712985,0.000057619836,0.00004960532,0.00011659624,0.00009196127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025741216,0.0007972414,0.00048598665,0.0014260067,0.0151192,0.005380869,0.0014300308,0.007555718,0.004614833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029664314,0.0003310529,0.00030780173,0.0017267129,0.026346894,0.008347363,0.0038091904,0.009201203,0.0009149183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001770287,0.000012088184,0.00008266023,0.00003761537,0.0000026635125,0.00017315749,0.04282771,0.000037115107,0.000076289885,0.83924335,0.113264956,0.0042246627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071758896,0.00000995622,0.00041107126,0.0003621409,0.000002699034,0.0001975132,0.013761722,0.00007875737,0.0001199843,0.07742364,0.9076044,0.000020980253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07808256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12035046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92191744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010680498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004270825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15525615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236504032","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14651682.v1","title":"Come fly with me: Analyzing the F-35 aircraft acquisition discourse to study incivility in question period","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incivility; Politics; Period (music); Ideology; Rhetoric; Political communication; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Social science; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.038324005461900165,"score_gpt":0.3082875254160106,"score_spread":0.26996351995411044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236504032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614577,0.0018668565,0.006181304,0.010531678,0.00013425377,0.00010775184,0.00023732586,0.00004723874,0.119435966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487597,0.00027625344,0.0007203915,0.0003386255,0.000038660168,0.000038426315,0.000075562464,0.000039708386,0.0035964777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260885,0.0049012317,0.00019444716,0.0005062888,0.0010686254,0.00072053773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96883976,0.026354037,0.0018042236,0.0008895529,0.0015338804,0.0005785158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086100185,0.00036210765,0.00040761856,0.003234573,0.010220003,0.012136651,0.0009098146,0.0022483177,0.0036129684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147004,0.0002881116,0.00025872522,0.0037103272,0.02177339,0.007749,0.0057379403,0.0034909737,0.0004405483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003961322,0.000013278602,0.002094769,0.000058630587,0.0000029157036,0.00022233647,0.9423429,0.000043317945,0.00092325645,0.049283,0.0006059037,0.0043701017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067331225,0.000024238167,0.0073428224,0.00025023325,0.000009244783,0.00017790927,0.918356,0.00030531976,0.0012237226,0.009106181,0.0631796,0.000017997578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03770022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033252206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03770022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014111583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049642376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10238719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237073778","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14655573.v1","title":"Affective news: a case-study of the work of emotions in news coverage of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Emotive; News media; Scholarship; Journalism; Narrative; News values; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Political science; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0672147832605781,"score_gpt":0.26631734864596274,"score_spread":0.19910256538538462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237073778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96115214,0.0009025834,0.0009898792,0.004300568,0.00020375392,0.0001111002,0.00007534188,0.000025635032,0.03223902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877181,0.001120082,0.00072880817,0.00097412086,0.00015503858,0.00008635461,0.000054872326,0.00004401536,0.009118482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531496,0.003347486,0.00013472965,0.0002834436,0.00032663075,0.00059267884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919863,0.005714518,0.0007503069,0.000341607,0.00041588774,0.0007913952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036805314,0.0007355006,0.00053988805,0.0022313527,0.019062813,0.0071800933,0.0015295468,0.004100866,0.0037180874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00962174,0.00054964446,0.00041516,0.0022300305,0.008868551,0.004366487,0.004985706,0.0039371047,0.0008174825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004084503,0.00013909265,0.003549094,0.000109927714,0.000009101702,0.006854612,0.9788222,0.000047217454,0.00056343304,0.0029535126,0.0016632429,0.005247745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052859064,0.00005893102,0.0061825416,0.000070522045,0.000008629708,0.0014841971,0.97083783,0.00011003508,0.00026805737,0.00043274937,0.020526806,0.000014504482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01624274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049856067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019062813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004661493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017288103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033821583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237385334","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14647152","title":"Witnessing the Genetic Self: How Non-Specialists use Reveal Videos to Approach Genetics and Race Through Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Ancestry Testing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for Social Innovation; Mount Royal University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic genealogy; Race (biology); Test (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Narrative; Identity (music); Intersectionality; Genetics; Sociology; Computer science; Biology; Gender studies; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.16263012216891587,"score_gpt":0.2917609967273701,"score_spread":0.12913087455845423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237385334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8698071,0.0010474335,0.009706448,0.019481191,0.00036104966,0.00008465794,0.00020313577,0.00009135349,0.099217586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873772,0.00042397907,0.0012589429,0.0017518708,0.000059226157,0.000035745386,0.000063724445,0.00008487712,0.008944529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387664,0.004707199,0.00009213813,0.00033201833,0.0005515276,0.00044040734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846622,0.012544759,0.0008854722,0.00051015115,0.0005934119,0.0008039823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005671425,0.00034360663,0.00021217506,0.0011707564,0.0063633923,0.0057484256,0.00082383305,0.0017958337,0.006552127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024430953,0.00030753308,0.00017971432,0.0006786447,0.0095369425,0.006436053,0.006643957,0.0027578243,0.0010386504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034155775,0.000019995789,0.0038023498,0.00005948261,0.0000037941772,0.0007196906,0.96967286,0.000030571435,0.0010275268,0.012570009,0.003066995,0.0089927055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008711582,0.000037477574,0.0026273257,0.00020153407,0.000008921082,0.00072125543,0.89774334,0.00024790957,0.00088459946,0.0050365245,0.092456184,0.000026164062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070124296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009935527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070124296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024816121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014931742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029993713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239423530","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/z6fht","title":"Valuing subjectivity in journalism: Bias, emotions, and self-interest as tools in arts reporting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Objectivity (philosophy); Journalism; Scholarship; Newspaper; Sociology; Virtue; Aesthetics; Media studies; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.38499172266259596,"score_gpt":0.3690441965843803,"score_spread":0.015947526078215646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239423530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88866186,0.0024738805,0.012135752,0.0084754005,0.0003193946,0.00009507109,0.000029458866,0.00006860434,0.08774047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966185,0.00032654428,0.0011273253,0.00043713066,0.00017341164,0.000042545784,0.000010132076,0.00004078109,0.0012235938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9264602,0.059618626,0.0017386922,0.0017115069,0.009098743,0.0013722016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77904654,0.17729214,0.023997556,0.0063477675,0.009155403,0.004160596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039370827,0.00049068895,0.00056541763,0.0042037307,0.0067020915,0.01811083,0.0009988834,0.0019481509,0.0011576285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118468255,0.0004375573,0.0003864694,0.0020778528,0.03396246,0.009134645,0.009549612,0.0035425373,0.00023701887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008532465,0.000048214093,0.019324902,0.00014092217,0.000022272048,0.00025448884,0.9376563,0.00005222078,0.0015724716,0.021217603,0.00039799168,0.019227332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003176932,0.00018634721,0.037201714,0.0007213287,0.00004636683,0.00096644275,0.88659453,0.00052191445,0.0032809281,0.039989322,0.03034464,0.00011471764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010950706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010759261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039370827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003064247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002265112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2082153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239949108","doi":"10.22215/etd/2012-07013","title":"Gorgias' Encomium of Helen as a model speech","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05589898855085331,"score_gpt":0.2869751579468244,"score_spread":0.23107616939597106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239949108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033644035,0.00326949,0.06753557,0.012212607,0.0013054326,0.00007472418,0.00026595435,0.001019282,0.8806729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7710002,0.001532716,0.020431243,0.0012730816,0.0004745244,0.00009623935,0.00024799455,0.00090888434,0.20403522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998679,0.00081376656,0.00003460269,0.00015754935,0.00021582964,0.000099219775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860054,0.00071671663,0.000058311143,0.00039698722,0.00013732011,0.000090002904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016463193,0.00044699915,0.0003897337,0.0016245039,0.002047366,0.0046621985,0.0005688911,0.001467233,0.015959669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004845787,0.00024091903,0.00029295665,0.0007461047,0.005653584,0.006626228,0.0033158688,0.0023006857,0.0031643256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025367712,0.0000066112043,0.00012296921,0.00003426874,0.0000025311056,0.00003913165,0.007905931,0.00014395354,0.00035417546,0.972546,0.005902964,0.0129160015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036056183,0.00004779206,0.0008791794,0.00023855559,0.000024139843,0.00037241922,0.00545438,0.0057672486,0.0026278456,0.3924003,0.5921225,0.00002963147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026727468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041158414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015959669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018535163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001162936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053390443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240750022","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199731596.013.061","title":"Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Literature; History; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0698559589662397,"score_gpt":0.2349362343564857,"score_spread":0.165080275390246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240750022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012931617,0.0072997613,0.004204544,0.01450917,0.012749132,0.00026205226,0.008266666,0.001238163,0.9501773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0143688535,0.008370278,0.0039028486,0.0057380805,0.0046375087,0.00032005462,0.011859862,0.00083316327,0.9499693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819946,0.00023468459,0.0001185296,0.0004126002,0.00083243864,0.00020226734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771404,0.00037408256,0.00010716429,0.00027124683,0.0012260275,0.00030743828],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172827,0.0009807938,0.00068754837,0.002264643,0.0022338375,0.007763639,0.0020683312,0.0027849555,0.5014128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053751655,0.0003410698,0.00069745525,0.0020178459,0.00091436185,0.004448711,0.003479082,0.0024757606,0.31475738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048279653,0.000040462568,0.0003323024,0.000510007,0.000005012642,0.00015122058,0.00068179244,0.00014693917,0.00032094252,0.05284918,0.8224475,0.12246646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019965655,0.000008135036,0.00016030925,0.00019018269,0.0000011368896,0.00005277608,0.00012842375,0.000016588132,0.000051848074,0.0023621817,0.9970228,0.0000034949437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034814782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026313097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4985872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028138035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032359953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71117413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241227371","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14651682","title":"Come fly with me: Analyzing the F-35 aircraft acquisition discourse to study incivility in question period","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incivility; Politics; Period (music); Ideology; Rhetoric; Political communication; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.038324005461900165,"score_gpt":0.3082875254160106,"score_spread":0.26996351995411044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241227371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614577,0.0018668565,0.006181304,0.010531678,0.00013425377,0.00010775184,0.00023732586,0.00004723874,0.119435966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487597,0.00027625344,0.0007203915,0.0003386255,0.000038660168,0.000038426315,0.000075562464,0.000039708386,0.0035964777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260885,0.0049012317,0.00019444716,0.0005062888,0.0010686254,0.00072053773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96883976,0.026354037,0.0018042236,0.0008895529,0.0015338804,0.0005785158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086100185,0.00036210765,0.00040761856,0.003234573,0.010220003,0.012136651,0.0009098146,0.0022483177,0.0036129684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147004,0.0002881116,0.00025872522,0.0037103272,0.02177339,0.007749,0.0057379403,0.0034909737,0.0004405483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003961322,0.000013278602,0.002094769,0.000058630587,0.0000029157036,0.00022233647,0.9423429,0.000043317945,0.00092325645,0.049283,0.0006059037,0.0043701017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067331225,0.000024238167,0.0073428224,0.00025023325,0.000009244783,0.00017790927,0.918356,0.00030531976,0.0012237226,0.009106181,0.0631796,0.000017997578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03770022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033252206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96229976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014111583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049642376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10238719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241481482","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14639781","title":"Between Rhetoric and Propaganda: A Case Study of Appeals to Pathos in Iraq War Justification","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Pathos; Rhetorical question; Appeal to emotion; Rhetoric; Politics; Appeal; Political philosophy; Sociology; Invective; Political science; Law; Media studies; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13726454871136365,"score_gpt":0.31797735043068703,"score_spread":0.18071280171932338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241481482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98226786,0.00031716574,0.0010885483,0.0023177736,0.00006454425,0.000053563697,0.000034983907,0.0000106161215,0.013844912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957266,0.00027134828,0.00074922555,0.00052936777,0.00010374861,0.00005231151,0.000025580199,0.000029388035,0.0025125598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98905164,0.008175121,0.00023505218,0.00038786538,0.0012104014,0.0009398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571842,0.037110347,0.0025120422,0.0007441604,0.0015298594,0.00091952825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006638817,0.0006108525,0.0005870843,0.0036579932,0.013726277,0.0063218097,0.0012526058,0.003930666,0.0030564882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028457342,0.00048631034,0.00039883956,0.003292291,0.0106577035,0.0041217012,0.004085384,0.0052162716,0.0005239984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005748281,0.0001195618,0.007865275,0.00010189513,0.000012743799,0.006682421,0.96961987,0.00007814806,0.001230785,0.0072583808,0.001190544,0.005782872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018186693,0.000066567954,0.012528414,0.00016388064,0.000014568307,0.0021376768,0.9522862,0.0005127902,0.0007392229,0.0020917743,0.029407034,0.000033758977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009303431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0210985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013726277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035585875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014247708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035109818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241533916","doi":"10.1017/9781316443668.015","title":"Glossary of Rhetorical Figures","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Glossary; Rhetorical question; Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Database; Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06430159000575929,"score_gpt":0.2687818320830168,"score_spread":0.2044802420772575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241533916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006151745,0.008286936,0.00829739,0.0020320846,0.0030882044,0.0006925757,0.2799871,0.0023827758,0.6946178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01384454,0.02417263,0.029298175,0.002502674,0.0030796982,0.0018364936,0.44123834,0.0069119297,0.47711542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905413,0.00022620367,0.00017601092,0.00014945347,0.0003341671,0.000059992846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452364,0.0021876367,0.00043864327,0.0006267977,0.0020036015,0.00021969875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011755571,0.0017914608,0.0012365587,0.017488865,0.0023688697,0.00558015,0.0013525776,0.0012152143,0.5775375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009865732,0.00078539946,0.0007039047,0.015799243,0.00095611357,0.0044090184,0.0020487567,0.002008662,0.40754968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030495698,0.000014270235,0.000071573486,0.0014707797,0.000005503743,0.0000639064,0.00023516323,0.000121018275,0.00025316482,0.02052814,0.9349466,0.042259432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031659524,0.0000026831422,0.000112504524,0.00036767434,0.0000032683859,0.00003416967,0.00005287161,0.000024222967,0.00004401751,0.0020685252,0.9972818,0.0000051990514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008222314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010198161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5775375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026103263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024327117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6025915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242109856","doi":"10.3138/cras-s036-01-04","title":"Mass Appeal(s): Representations of Women’s Public Speech in Suffrage Literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suffrage; Appeal; Politics; Conceptualization; Negotiation; Sociology; Public sphere; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies; History; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03576378362396688,"score_gpt":0.2924999635652584,"score_spread":0.25673617994129155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242109856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.612108,0.008746118,0.0030548458,0.020617655,0.0009886409,0.000037208025,0.00015178118,0.00013503559,0.35416064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246806,0.00054517895,0.00010474975,0.00024913996,0.0002260179,0.000011417021,0.000019102963,0.000028801374,0.0063474826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980545,0.0011748397,0.000038144986,0.00013457391,0.00037071077,0.00022720755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603015,0.0027139946,0.0005670287,0.00019085013,0.00025795514,0.00023992249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025560814,0.0004096001,0.00033332835,0.0031851,0.007918833,0.009783151,0.00065962813,0.0020965151,0.005923262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050443634,0.00021948977,0.0001818372,0.002132567,0.0147008505,0.004691445,0.004366551,0.0021674423,0.00036997264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006289673,0.000020202673,0.00088873156,0.00010691116,0.0000060753378,0.00061065436,0.8746199,0.00005474473,0.0006723626,0.10844041,0.0054906975,0.009026413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002182875,0.00007359226,0.0067431466,0.0005105278,0.000016952128,0.0007474981,0.68476975,0.00035489906,0.00091737707,0.01904652,0.28676665,0.000031231553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007617961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010023517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009783151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048056254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015531391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034867406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243052644","doi":"10.3138/utq.81.2.246","title":"Pure Persuasion: Metarhetorical Motives in Kenneth Burke’s <i>Towards a Better Life</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Neologism; Uncanny; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Energy (signal processing); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychology; Literature; Linguistics; Art","score_opus":0.028730980085583356,"score_gpt":0.21595636008801714,"score_spread":0.18722538000243377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243052644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091022864,0.015566185,0.030037625,0.35218143,0.0025769072,0.000058385584,0.00006041412,0.0001877122,0.50830835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95684725,0.0012872452,0.0034570238,0.008188152,0.00044857126,0.00004990244,0.000008701973,0.000100855126,0.02961221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947291,0.004058761,0.000086118554,0.00033666415,0.00055159966,0.00023776825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581367,0.0027879302,0.0003503801,0.00032949384,0.0003692867,0.00034910897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039492166,0.00035807854,0.0002948441,0.00053662434,0.0058969446,0.008682628,0.0007259287,0.0037865455,0.0021274195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073403767,0.0002856557,0.00020449617,0.00039473907,0.03415069,0.006224931,0.003030103,0.0053697787,0.00050044537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017588765,0.000010615757,0.0001126315,0.00003793467,0.0000034463328,0.00013297447,0.044303883,0.000053282412,0.00019976703,0.9422732,0.010163111,0.0026914827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031940082,0.000035213925,0.0005921792,0.00022730563,0.00001199088,0.000676466,0.036699463,0.0006181018,0.001105274,0.46966732,0.49029127,0.000043502518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032767605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00534608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008682628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038457448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019597458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02790302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243244020","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.48.2.0233","title":"Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.21426168424387784,"score_gpt":0.2766817939204269,"score_spread":0.06242010967654907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243244020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10572476,0.016307652,0.06356934,0.078140795,0.00079364335,0.000103080696,0.00008384766,0.0002329804,0.73504394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835381,0.0013625212,0.0045565306,0.002078302,0.00037080722,0.00007557,0.0000385536,0.00006577819,0.007913828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731319,0.018752923,0.00077424396,0.002214958,0.003600691,0.0015252827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97189134,0.021296883,0.0026266887,0.0017722407,0.001674864,0.0007379578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020273061,0.0005022161,0.00064604013,0.0033637595,0.005871138,0.012545872,0.0012403646,0.0045837006,0.0045311837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024807444,0.00040611485,0.0007403508,0.002314493,0.041877076,0.012718504,0.0088549685,0.004832697,0.0008316602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012881535,0.00001413038,0.0002668685,0.000039777224,0.0000075257594,0.000047332134,0.010183595,0.0002199515,0.00010420476,0.981938,0.0010791329,0.006086545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001983931,0.000014989985,0.00030230527,0.00009977569,0.000006658087,0.00006523112,0.0025798278,0.00031902106,0.00026353987,0.96138567,0.034931254,0.000011840404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010634926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066607323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020273061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044195177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033628661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107215464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245008094","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691167732.001.0001","title":"Ethical Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Princeton University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Creatures; Epistemology; Ethnography; Social science; Anthropology; Natural (archaeology); History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11970992181736234,"score_gpt":0.24240930070266958,"score_spread":0.12269937888530724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245008094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008572871,0.008518747,0.0028212785,0.01316813,0.0027555255,0.00003352109,0.000058273392,0.000072185685,0.9717149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06628904,0.0078114495,0.003600604,0.014452699,0.001974654,0.00013566918,0.00017120778,0.00018400946,0.90538055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800307,0.0007863406,0.000070627204,0.00022955367,0.00068426726,0.00022609244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.00030256517,0.000070233444,0.00014853453,0.00022005136,0.00011601002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012635449,0.0006719333,0.00036625142,0.00074068276,0.004631487,0.007448764,0.000691052,0.0029805268,0.023224898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033181296,0.00023739885,0.00034456645,0.0006845379,0.009963216,0.005622014,0.004109574,0.0050428202,0.010010205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003527697,0.000007773916,0.0000455187,0.000040723473,0.0000016499379,0.00004278697,0.0032394533,0.000047729307,0.00007867334,0.8681903,0.10984481,0.018457133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010916724,0.0000034536738,0.000049837618,0.000114408904,7.2714124e-7,0.000071334165,0.00081637007,0.000028820978,0.00004119569,0.06295378,0.9359155,0.0000033532433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017256711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033319264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023224898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032896632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028332178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07769501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245194067","doi":"10.3138/utq.75.4.971","title":"Addicts, Edicts, and Empty Infinities: The Rhetoric of Drugs from De Quincey to Derrida","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Drug addict; Literature; Addiction; History; Art; Psychiatry; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.010500176569079282,"score_gpt":0.1866568689776774,"score_spread":0.1761566924085981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245194067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062445126,0.029928437,0.012701308,0.20375106,0.0022046568,0.00003487011,0.00012016618,0.00013332909,0.6886811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644384,0.00302327,0.0011325468,0.007704505,0.00061278144,0.000019817418,0.000016914308,0.00012706788,0.022924671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661285,0.0024714847,0.00007015752,0.00023269553,0.00035444493,0.00025836928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914613,0.007179347,0.00029211058,0.00032971043,0.00045370866,0.00028382617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045413603,0.0005755279,0.00059982395,0.001315728,0.010122224,0.00788451,0.001059143,0.004289342,0.006526802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009230866,0.00046992407,0.0002556859,0.0011696311,0.039110176,0.009247519,0.004656473,0.008333114,0.0005504201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022729222,0.0000060001425,0.00012575112,0.000049040274,0.0000030715776,0.00007958057,0.050620347,0.000041126266,0.00008521902,0.9371368,0.008324894,0.0035054241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004459106,0.000039299866,0.0006257852,0.00054148724,0.000029705747,0.00031423106,0.06835239,0.0005768154,0.0007498659,0.40157935,0.5270995,0.00004700412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026607307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03512935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026607307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008900441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033273627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06457758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245408096","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661753","title":"Ethnographic journalism and the American urban crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Underclass; Prejudice (legal term); Sociology; Journalism; Empathy; Poverty; Gentrification; Scholarship; Media studies; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.057252020302790065,"score_gpt":0.2768229341584163,"score_spread":0.21957091385562624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245408096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44452795,0.018837463,0.0025988114,0.12978372,0.0017784974,0.00006099221,0.00020023165,0.000113919115,0.40209842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824025,0.0056641093,0.0006464925,0.0033034363,0.0010212314,0.00007828921,0.000037364673,0.00004986413,0.0067968466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99015146,0.0083703995,0.00019544455,0.00032916994,0.00054920214,0.00040424513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466538,0.04709163,0.002354904,0.001432265,0.0012077116,0.0012595858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009377588,0.00035088873,0.00032159564,0.006809498,0.013794834,0.011998664,0.00067655626,0.002183297,0.0040386873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016777748,0.00032839982,0.00012852691,0.006332197,0.03228286,0.008228459,0.0067114113,0.0023324026,0.00026282403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045049066,0.0000550093,0.0045433473,0.00022750004,0.000008735267,0.00071435457,0.62857366,0.00006884936,0.00037821423,0.33017534,0.016776972,0.018432971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025766618,0.00002654689,0.0041975854,0.00048140358,0.000011424841,0.0005185966,0.6584119,0.00014686788,0.00047340052,0.053624805,0.28206417,0.000017554506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005319754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008751016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013794834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005115947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024945352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049593985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245409835","doi":"10.3138/ecf.22.1.1","title":"Pity, or the Providence of the Body in Richardson's <i>Clarissa</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pity; Decorum; Aesthetics; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Solidarity; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.028033310843612144,"score_gpt":0.2427234537356602,"score_spread":0.21469014289204807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245409835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059561092,0.010885822,0.024579197,0.06587016,0.0029018505,0.00009127882,0.00005237619,0.00027743596,0.83578086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87970406,0.0015806615,0.0036104613,0.005295252,0.0005824803,0.00006565301,0.00001341023,0.00015811899,0.10898998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837154,0.0009552381,0.000036474925,0.00023650443,0.0002206365,0.00017971284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985576,0.0008297511,0.00017139514,0.00020029562,0.00014547352,0.00009544244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019321295,0.00039010932,0.0003526971,0.00073506933,0.0077255303,0.005303648,0.0006081377,0.0022901609,0.003293607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053877123,0.00026721647,0.00023301695,0.0003937238,0.034346104,0.005700797,0.0037024566,0.0046759,0.0008629773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028304903,0.0000045610973,0.00012288771,0.000059347927,0.0000025533247,0.00018052354,0.03797643,0.00004314439,0.00027141615,0.9469784,0.008475068,0.0058574337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015066443,0.000096989796,0.00043529246,0.00037458588,0.000017016726,0.00055120134,0.026741257,0.00021068648,0.0013267272,0.107618555,0.8625819,0.000030745567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003936662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074254344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077255303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027909665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018837837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020250022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247069491","doi":"10.17760/d20318698","title":"Embodying, producing, and materializing citizenship","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; University of Pittsburgh; Harvard University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Scholarship; Sociology; Literacy; Embodied cognition; Pedagogy; Political science; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.052265704253675674,"score_gpt":0.2669209847208016,"score_spread":0.21465528046712595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247069491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67789865,0.0011563185,0.015755253,0.003284432,0.00007118347,0.000048242884,0.000027651451,0.00011080249,0.30164748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904261,0.00020735593,0.0021630074,0.00007393194,0.000014393216,0.000011136438,0.000011017176,0.00003044148,0.0070626186],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979632,0.0012791853,0.00004414915,0.00018091364,0.00028771456,0.00024489616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760664,0.0014870226,0.0002120144,0.00033737134,0.00016639584,0.0001905412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034819068,0.00024737412,0.00019376444,0.0013406166,0.0038404816,0.0055863583,0.0006190582,0.0006615978,0.0023283307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038251216,0.0001959329,0.00015570523,0.00089660136,0.025859509,0.004000924,0.004396459,0.001150323,0.00022294631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001217651,0.000026742695,0.0047295094,0.000082229824,0.0000047041926,0.0004273601,0.5906554,0.00012660342,0.0016605402,0.36520374,0.0010713986,0.03599968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016732785,0.0001581429,0.013913868,0.0004744226,0.000033765682,0.00093331677,0.49281156,0.00075010135,0.00532962,0.15122683,0.33431572,0.000035982925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021676829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005875181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055863583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023908073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002511479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018414319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247171463","doi":"10.3138/cras.38.3.375","title":"Death and the Maidens: Vancouver's Missing Women, the Montreal Massacre, and Commemoration's Blind Spots","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Grief; Rhetoric; Resistance (ecology); Criminology; Gender studies; Status quo; Subject (documents); Sociology; History; Media studies; Political science; Law; Psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.06293566712157854,"score_gpt":0.2754563679667162,"score_spread":0.21252070084513763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247171463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4499813,0.17066634,0.0009563263,0.082227506,0.0030436774,0.00006223008,0.00030800176,0.00008446761,0.29267016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306292,0.033483863,0.00023160737,0.0024605477,0.00036507458,0.000024964693,0.000086163556,0.000027997712,0.032690544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835396,0.0006809827,0.000031480093,0.00010463835,0.00048046684,0.00034841185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710053,0.0012127074,0.0003405616,0.00011468185,0.0006523146,0.0005792043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001830155,0.0005203873,0.00035814426,0.0025903091,0.021006225,0.0076913587,0.0013822201,0.0017453642,0.0044772974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059881727,0.0002553541,0.00011657802,0.004074677,0.022289444,0.0021412636,0.0037090706,0.0025860206,0.00030823197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058426773,0.00002986767,0.0037019893,0.0007271575,0.000017380285,0.0013512127,0.78557974,0.00012556819,0.00030361532,0.073357485,0.056136604,0.07861095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004995023,0.00002431926,0.00826136,0.00079504505,0.000015034532,0.00040164439,0.60689807,0.000030109999,0.00024505265,0.0019642822,0.38133317,0.000026854657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78650004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92233276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21349996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024053015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024090527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4295146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247308390","doi":"10.1163/15691640-12341436","title":"Interpreting Silence?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Phenomenology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Mythology; Indirection; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Exegesis; Sociology; Aesthetics; Literature; Theology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.564111714343151,"score_gpt":0.4202522431875781,"score_spread":0.1438594711555729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247308390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07357816,0.015043948,0.048419155,0.195501,0.009179552,0.000097277974,0.00023327697,0.0003479078,0.6575997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628047,0.0028129893,0.0018589692,0.008960248,0.0014997373,0.000054107106,0.000095614945,0.00018756364,0.021725982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910779,0.0064412137,0.00023027824,0.0006992344,0.0009613809,0.00059005927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903493,0.0065202136,0.0008260323,0.0005747248,0.0012512269,0.0004785379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068596443,0.0006110135,0.00051621423,0.0010016088,0.0065054926,0.009005241,0.0013129615,0.003667451,0.0082043875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022775875,0.00023509591,0.00044637264,0.00073977595,0.029414296,0.011648788,0.0057531754,0.0057666567,0.0023355149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047875594,0.000009497742,0.00039244303,0.00014654333,0.000007953086,0.0004210962,0.25158694,0.00007509368,0.00055025757,0.723109,0.012595947,0.0110573685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021959428,0.00005248191,0.00043479312,0.0011850009,0.00002358636,0.0007760871,0.18599369,0.00051202526,0.0016581586,0.39819783,0.4111002,0.000044165048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031979107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019936564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009005241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041313656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028050654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03627771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248410531","doi":"10.3138/cras.37.1.111","title":"The Addressed and the Redressed: Helen Hunt Jackson's Protest Essay and the US Protest Novel Tradition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mythology; Appeal; Economic Justice; Literature; History; Sociology; Literary criticism; Law; Media studies; Classics; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04307759335472057,"score_gpt":0.2803649688928817,"score_spread":0.23728737553816115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248410531","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21545815,0.065049626,0.0008500099,0.40806553,0.007553,0.000019501244,0.000036509813,0.000044618955,0.30292305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412765,0.008195463,0.00019751638,0.018860888,0.0017497464,0.00001824902,0.000012538781,0.000030582847,0.029658472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750024,0.0017150413,0.00003228245,0.00017095373,0.00033776351,0.0002438522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951904,0.0035432219,0.00031955424,0.00010500973,0.00044607028,0.00039571457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025642274,0.00020743543,0.00024138717,0.001258315,0.0087033175,0.00620824,0.00062528707,0.0026711647,0.002418415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006062801,0.00013203557,0.0001010958,0.0010074765,0.013768487,0.0029183961,0.0026530658,0.0030366352,0.0002081318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044789864,0.00009282552,0.0012530246,0.00022734654,0.000013388544,0.0013026535,0.32321107,0.000113526745,0.00053695915,0.42614093,0.21897823,0.028085262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009629489,0.000023660827,0.00219333,0.0006983154,0.000009798357,0.0005493933,0.15791436,0.00010008507,0.0004209381,0.01643412,0.8216264,0.000019943995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016790062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03920575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016790062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005137293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004167473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037273884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248463417","doi":"10.2307/25606063","title":"Fish Talk","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.12836872094427199,"score_gpt":0.27285410236581914,"score_spread":0.14448538142154715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248463417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010778067,0.0009810806,0.0011097692,0.009043665,0.004111262,0.00004020842,0.0005878744,0.00042298992,0.98262525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047769123,0.00020963202,0.00020095159,0.001045067,0.0004237891,0.0000176055,0.00014238081,0.00013368121,0.99305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993529,0.00012366654,0.000018284845,0.00013475155,0.00025921088,0.00011120148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998914,0.00023003112,0.000039309198,0.00018129386,0.00032429752,0.00031116768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086897606,0.0007813117,0.0004611755,0.0022585897,0.005097027,0.0059429957,0.0009107626,0.002736303,0.59934175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030179678,0.00032811597,0.0005100374,0.0011427538,0.0015679856,0.003710442,0.0049609174,0.0025080612,0.27259588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007413719,0.000024576773,0.00025776718,0.00007120415,0.0000057974503,0.00012779339,0.0009124629,0.000056797275,0.0004791473,0.061180316,0.86995745,0.06685252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039668857,0.000006166221,0.00016127776,0.000027577877,0.0000018260616,0.00003686325,0.00033935488,0.000026858665,0.00008043562,0.0031898923,0.9961217,0.000004021086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073375003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016483953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59934175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002341539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017752378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248648092","doi":"10.1353/esc.2004.0052","title":"Introduction: The Keywords Collective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.045261044355987975,"score_gpt":0.24634604354451098,"score_spread":0.20108499918852302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248648092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00270495,0.060013507,0.0018462561,0.2639463,0.09980785,0.000104028986,0.0060438076,0.00036875042,0.56516457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06849407,0.032885224,0.001058219,0.049516745,0.043427162,0.00012512637,0.0028121932,0.00045907593,0.8012222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984641,0.00015531258,0.00007078185,0.0002991274,0.0007085485,0.00030203292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461293,0.001133259,0.00026399476,0.00028979944,0.0028183435,0.0008816576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017398869,0.00078970793,0.00068244926,0.0033300663,0.0055024517,0.010338217,0.0017986165,0.0038953754,0.090906255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042141513,0.00034364726,0.00043093794,0.0067604594,0.0043519274,0.0042244527,0.0019277106,0.0040667565,0.021620436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017331653,0.000006905149,0.00024369222,0.00035605836,0.0000033818312,0.000019002015,0.00078033254,0.000039793693,0.00007643242,0.09107825,0.8879357,0.019443192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022416475,0.0000026260352,0.0006993014,0.00023063956,0.000003634107,0.000014577466,0.00044899358,0.00001720511,0.000025285895,0.0017661578,0.99678314,0.0000061282617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5822333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64507735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4177667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021432841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025054926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.840454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249248016","doi":"10.3138/cras.2013.007","title":"Dismemberment, Repetition, and Working-Through: Keeping Up in <i>Treme</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Rhetoric; Dismemberment; Order (exchange); History; Sociology; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.07120657502610661,"score_gpt":0.2951637946238753,"score_spread":0.2239572195977687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249248016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37033537,0.026719566,0.0068793,0.045912433,0.0015423124,0.000046341884,0.000052477735,0.000097213066,0.54841495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829928,0.0030077707,0.00043322062,0.00080845697,0.00023818786,0.00001208127,0.000011812679,0.00003196628,0.012463631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997092,0.0021309056,0.000046732395,0.00012893067,0.00039190697,0.00020956533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529904,0.0033968461,0.00052019395,0.00027168327,0.00027514543,0.0002371445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038157518,0.00027970757,0.00029533813,0.0013540915,0.006049589,0.0047852877,0.00087135733,0.0014217022,0.0040096403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056628822,0.0001616364,0.00017055309,0.0011649134,0.028562497,0.0052177543,0.0037556689,0.003067735,0.0003991018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046297035,0.000038015805,0.000964391,0.00029294245,0.000010330157,0.00047142163,0.48161238,0.000060145994,0.00075701333,0.4840404,0.008195807,0.0235109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014072067,0.00008677643,0.00480664,0.001101967,0.000027657177,0.0011798661,0.47187278,0.00021008031,0.0017084955,0.061188992,0.4577692,0.000033427612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022019425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004036653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006049589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017858307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001960133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020179868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250419928","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14655573","title":"Affective news: a case-study of the work of emotions in news coverage of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Emotive; News media; Journalism; Scholarship; Narrative; News values; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Media studies; Social psychology; Literature; Epistemology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0672147832605781,"score_gpt":0.26631734864596274,"score_spread":0.19910256538538462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250419928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96115214,0.0009025834,0.0009898792,0.004300568,0.00020375392,0.0001111002,0.00007534188,0.000025635032,0.03223902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877181,0.001120082,0.00072880817,0.00097412086,0.00015503858,0.00008635461,0.000054872326,0.00004401536,0.009118482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531496,0.003347486,0.00013472965,0.0002834436,0.00032663075,0.00059267884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919863,0.005714518,0.0007503069,0.000341607,0.00041588774,0.0007913952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036805314,0.0007355006,0.00053988805,0.0022313527,0.019062813,0.0071800933,0.0015295468,0.004100866,0.0037180874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00962174,0.00054964446,0.00041516,0.0022300305,0.008868551,0.004366487,0.004985706,0.0039371047,0.0008174825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004084503,0.00013909265,0.003549094,0.000109927714,0.000009101702,0.006854612,0.9788222,0.000047217454,0.00056343304,0.0029535126,0.0016632429,0.005247745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052859064,0.00005893102,0.0061825416,0.000070522045,0.000008629708,0.0014841971,0.97083783,0.00011003508,0.00026805737,0.00043274937,0.020526806,0.000014504482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01624274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049856067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019062813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004661493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017288103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033821583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251289303","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch090","title":"Ethics, Media, and Reasoning","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Interconnectivity; Function (biology); Information ethics; Ethics of technology; Engineering ethics; Globalization; Sociology; Psychology; Meta-ethics; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06434155843533765,"score_gpt":0.2679637327676004,"score_spread":0.20362217433226273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251289303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036299208,0.040478148,0.010617748,0.01904454,0.0012336335,0.000042792457,0.000039151077,0.000058103684,0.92485607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4877978,0.06229366,0.020805726,0.015379429,0.0041057984,0.00035254963,0.0002011449,0.00030061675,0.4087633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680316,0.0020241367,0.00008269904,0.0002492113,0.0006818002,0.00015893298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733645,0.0021696044,0.00011095679,0.00013414024,0.00017608858,0.00007277147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027197963,0.00071612454,0.00042825396,0.0018709886,0.004126872,0.009765945,0.000940075,0.0027304124,0.008357692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039316164,0.00025682396,0.00027407135,0.0015525328,0.03023941,0.008173355,0.0030369267,0.004098923,0.0015782996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002355186,0.000004593437,0.000025644435,0.000057561698,0.0000011981258,0.000038523187,0.0035872443,0.000095135714,0.000047116933,0.98330873,0.005219116,0.0076127085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045187894,0.000007207492,0.00012378661,0.0006539661,0.0000027886217,0.00012449898,0.0031225025,0.0001717627,0.00015197638,0.6334709,0.36215797,0.000008096634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021271624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018060448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009765945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041975575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003330929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03045553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251506311","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14656548","title":"No MSG: Chinese Restaurant Menus, Monosodium Glutamate and the Trope of Risk in Shaping Chinese Culture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Professional Engineers Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monosodium glutamate; Rhetorical question; Advertising; Synecdoche; Business; Persuasion; China; Chinese culture; Psychology; Marketing; Food science; Social psychology; Political science; Art; Linguistics; Literature; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.027408263577403905,"score_gpt":0.25929126479688186,"score_spread":0.23188300121947797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251506311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8669061,0.0018166278,0.0047575682,0.014872739,0.00021732165,0.00004239787,0.00008024133,0.00004426768,0.11126277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586135,0.00027349472,0.00036233565,0.00030605693,0.000018187731,0.0000070195024,0.0000099898825,0.000010212283,0.0031514678],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871767,0.00060007285,0.00004409682,0.00013585042,0.00033247337,0.00016985158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974439,0.0012513408,0.00047612342,0.00019707147,0.00039978416,0.0002318414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025181128,0.00051318767,0.00019267065,0.0012303453,0.0071834084,0.004399983,0.0005726489,0.0011002959,0.0026596184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039512953,0.00018147795,0.00020891755,0.0012316644,0.019141974,0.0024956865,0.002578194,0.0015135955,0.00016104212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001240125,0.00002008376,0.019331383,0.000267616,0.000023899898,0.0012302385,0.7736814,0.0003109241,0.0041307253,0.18217327,0.0021896136,0.016516907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031185667,0.00012484942,0.044002634,0.0004398954,0.000104664476,0.0007418465,0.7675192,0.0014246027,0.0048563154,0.034409612,0.14620368,0.00014142816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1474792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1367532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1474792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009214632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074848305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29324156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253308653","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14647152.v1","title":"Witnessing the Genetic Self: How Non-Specialists use Reveal Videos to Approach Genetics and Race Through Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Ancestry Testing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Centre for Social Innovation; Mount Royal University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Genetic genealogy; Race (biology); Test (biology); Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Identity (music); Intersectionality; Sociology; Genetics; Computer science; Biology; Gender studies; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.16263012216891587,"score_gpt":0.2917609967273701,"score_spread":0.12913087455845423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253308653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8698071,0.0010474335,0.009706448,0.019481191,0.00036104966,0.00008465794,0.00020313577,0.00009135349,0.099217586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873772,0.00042397907,0.0012589429,0.0017518708,0.000059226157,0.000035745386,0.000063724445,0.00008487712,0.008944529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387664,0.004707199,0.00009213813,0.00033201833,0.0005515276,0.00044040734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846622,0.012544759,0.0008854722,0.00051015115,0.0005934119,0.0008039823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005671425,0.00034360663,0.00021217506,0.0011707564,0.0063633923,0.0057484256,0.00082383305,0.0017958337,0.006552127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024430953,0.00030753308,0.00017971432,0.0006786447,0.0095369425,0.006436053,0.006643957,0.0027578243,0.0010386504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034155775,0.000019995789,0.0038023498,0.00005948261,0.0000037941772,0.0007196906,0.96967286,0.000030571435,0.0010275268,0.012570009,0.003066995,0.0089927055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008711582,0.000037477574,0.0026273257,0.00020153407,0.000008921082,0.00072125543,0.89774334,0.00024790957,0.00088459946,0.0050365245,0.092456184,0.000026164062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070124296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009935527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024816121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014931742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029993713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254248834","doi":"10.22215/etd/2008-08001","title":"The Americans are coming! The Americans are coming! Framing the Great Lakes water debate in the North American Press","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Humanities; Art; Art history; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05471271659889377,"score_gpt":0.2691384706756342,"score_spread":0.21442575407674042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254248834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12946448,0.017322345,0.00042690945,0.35467425,0.00085389346,0.000015131401,0.000056719626,0.00003449197,0.4971518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.893227,0.005787423,0.00020754563,0.022599103,0.00066853006,0.00003846589,0.000022172173,0.000058277234,0.07739158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650574,0.0023648199,0.00004842548,0.00015828092,0.0003857914,0.0005369035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959462,0.0029913252,0.00028721252,0.00010975202,0.00029333233,0.0003721772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003522806,0.00024585938,0.0002577146,0.0015681037,0.017623961,0.014992626,0.0007739087,0.0047717406,0.011537766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005083118,0.0002924797,0.00015598415,0.002754726,0.023945168,0.009351432,0.0052088443,0.004456073,0.00071017956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004536333,0.000025575175,0.0017846689,0.0001414341,0.000009155882,0.00033038156,0.30339473,0.00008703568,0.00023521946,0.6032911,0.07396623,0.01668909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018635705,0.00001434358,0.00551416,0.0006298041,0.000020849731,0.000055060387,0.33342212,0.00012211592,0.00026362704,0.07524667,0.5846639,0.000028717664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14428608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2823309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8557139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016484208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009332915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28689253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254376448","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0052","title":"Televised Debates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Political science; Politics; Face (sociological concept); Media studies; Adversary; Presidential election; General election; Law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.07957755754690989,"score_gpt":0.2566707865030963,"score_spread":0.17709322895618645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254376448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015840907,0.0014905107,0.0067285015,0.0020757734,0.0020424651,0.0001898653,0.001259202,0.0007779007,0.96959484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36682716,0.0026201655,0.00995924,0.0033458997,0.003042747,0.0005591371,0.0036638395,0.0016960539,0.6082858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979279,0.00074395613,0.00009928993,0.00029710022,0.0006742751,0.00025742184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951444,0.0021643103,0.0004379067,0.0011136582,0.000677471,0.00046227183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014963341,0.0004137953,0.0002713817,0.0015784905,0.00211801,0.005986918,0.000814478,0.0015928828,0.18702908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007560825,0.00022171468,0.0004161292,0.001996837,0.0012200559,0.006237835,0.002963095,0.0018181838,0.03561341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006419415,0.00022546972,0.001927152,0.0011546598,0.00003378095,0.0008170509,0.014436117,0.0005536743,0.0076450147,0.31483036,0.28957778,0.36815703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003495599,0.00003615973,0.0006338543,0.00012071789,0.0000062974595,0.00016792945,0.001229401,0.00020352413,0.0014379228,0.008016437,0.9881032,0.000009564458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055185525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007907222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18702908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013728667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076301524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6256746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254554688","doi":"10.5406/illinois/9780252040139.003.0001","title":"Multiculturalism, Minor Publics, and Social Intimacy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Illinois Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Publics; Racialization; Feeling; Gender studies; Rhetoric; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Race (biology); Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08159393465170663,"score_gpt":0.22987257283272228,"score_spread":0.14827863818101567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254554688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017066509,0.0059914333,0.0005174389,0.022764232,0.0006658085,0.00001656577,0.000012861263,0.00003617855,0.95292896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6565126,0.005068027,0.00037539468,0.0054259193,0.00054351875,0.00003572502,0.000024917974,0.00007435955,0.3319395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873704,0.0005213848,0.00001486751,0.00007877711,0.00032957512,0.0003183243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991773,0.0004246612,0.00005568109,0.00005104689,0.000101969476,0.00018935444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010857452,0.00038273513,0.00024601602,0.000900025,0.020660577,0.008459407,0.0007498022,0.0016596572,0.008416527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021596877,0.00019944672,0.00018150565,0.0011124611,0.021770952,0.003720466,0.00538956,0.0040834616,0.00079802016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045111415,0.000010370021,0.00021368936,0.00003208914,9.5317387e-7,0.00010491865,0.05738437,0.000020705942,0.00008596939,0.9089051,0.021656744,0.011580478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031024335,0.000011481617,0.0007128494,0.0002229867,0.0000036689228,0.00016204073,0.044000447,0.000052756943,0.00017222334,0.061930884,0.89272004,0.000007580848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16667028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014853179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009084862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18325114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254742686","doi":"10.3138/cras.41.3.299","title":"A “21st Century Economic Agenda for America”: Barack Obama's Pre-Presidential Economic Jeremiads","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Rhetoric; Democracy; Order (exchange); Atonement; Political science; Happiness; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Economics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07805551829891015,"score_gpt":0.3014561169178293,"score_spread":0.22340059861891914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254742686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018820217,0.07637422,0.0008829297,0.6713976,0.008986592,0.00001394371,0.000026039128,0.00002143238,0.2234769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76197803,0.041689802,0.0010843164,0.1381441,0.006968537,0.000082776074,0.000038366503,0.00006166473,0.049952235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484694,0.003415798,0.0000926804,0.00023143124,0.00080144854,0.0006117181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921822,0.005738099,0.00051782414,0.00014373397,0.0008600786,0.0005580662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007514826,0.0003773635,0.000380607,0.001986314,0.017252315,0.014449049,0.00082570314,0.005774421,0.005274262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103443125,0.0002155448,0.00021398831,0.002185016,0.015501063,0.009329838,0.0041321195,0.011441566,0.0005153897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018812865,0.00002586278,0.00024527957,0.00015046266,0.000003423134,0.00013293096,0.041649975,0.00004043909,0.00008612472,0.844636,0.10040804,0.012602688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007889633,0.000009784967,0.00073111226,0.0009575912,0.0000073183633,0.00007261512,0.029934747,0.000047903468,0.00010283178,0.04085716,0.92725533,0.000015699088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02739936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03763452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02739936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01036712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010503329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075219095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255586970","doi":"10.3138/cras.40.3.327","title":"Exorcistes américains : la <i>Heritage Foundation</i>, la guerre culturelle et la sauvegarde du mariage et des valeurs familiales traditionnelles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Soul; Convention; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Identity (music); Human sexuality; Order (exchange); Humanities; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Theology","score_opus":0.051411779564850095,"score_gpt":0.3099193383055161,"score_spread":0.258507558740666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255586970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23941875,0.14268094,0.00095492834,0.16494036,0.0017609332,0.000025915926,0.000051367588,0.000041591164,0.4501253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611531,0.020298103,0.00020562617,0.0037585879,0.00032522375,0.000012938604,0.000014827225,0.000012991796,0.014218643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761105,0.0015904239,0.00004266076,0.00016380167,0.00036906643,0.00022304895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559253,0.0029451386,0.00054061244,0.000091205824,0.00060324627,0.00022719157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051863194,0.0002197138,0.0002073929,0.0017197332,0.006601394,0.0055581974,0.0006301056,0.0018121741,0.0032085823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035378896,0.0001439518,0.000079855185,0.0019564396,0.014463238,0.0030170614,0.0017468152,0.0029819568,0.00022266526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047146958,0.00006787887,0.00451757,0.0004489749,0.00001757501,0.00071612373,0.37086347,0.00004217155,0.00070994324,0.4914868,0.054477174,0.07660517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012803506,0.00002438046,0.0090017235,0.0013017702,0.00002492326,0.00037344426,0.26730382,0.000060231778,0.00066253985,0.0077606076,0.7134526,0.000021078073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07745772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12099633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069868998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008687773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15401375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255924461","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14646597","title":"Come Fly With Me: Analyzing The F-35 Aircraft Acquisition Discourse to Study Incivility in Question Period","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incivility; Politics; Period (music); Ideology; Rhetoric; Political communication; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Social science; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.038324005461900165,"score_gpt":0.3082875254160106,"score_spread":0.26996351995411044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255924461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614577,0.0018668565,0.006181304,0.010531678,0.00013425377,0.00010775184,0.00023732586,0.00004723874,0.119435966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487597,0.00027625344,0.0007203915,0.0003386255,0.000038660168,0.000038426315,0.000075562464,0.000039708386,0.0035964777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260885,0.0049012317,0.00019444716,0.0005062888,0.0010686254,0.00072053773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96883976,0.026354037,0.0018042236,0.0008895529,0.0015338804,0.0005785158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086100185,0.00036210765,0.00040761856,0.003234573,0.010220003,0.012136651,0.0009098146,0.0022483177,0.0036129684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02147004,0.0002881116,0.00025872522,0.0037103272,0.02177339,0.007749,0.0057379403,0.0034909737,0.0004405483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003961322,0.000013278602,0.002094769,0.000058630587,0.0000029157036,0.00022233647,0.9423429,0.000043317945,0.00092325645,0.049283,0.0006059037,0.0043701017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067331225,0.000024238167,0.0073428224,0.00025023325,0.000009244783,0.00017790927,0.918356,0.00030531976,0.0012237226,0.009106181,0.0631796,0.000017997578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03770022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033252206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96229976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014111583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049642376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10238719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280520763","doi":"10.1080/13504622.2022.2075830","title":"“A good hell”: absurdist insights for environmental education &amp; research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Education Research","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental education; Scholarship; Absurdism; Closing (real estate); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Pedagogy; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17056319916324997,"score_gpt":0.4044371425796776,"score_spread":0.23387394341642764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280520763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21697606,0.010747597,0.017259117,0.13227847,0.0011217889,0.00006544753,0.00012568544,0.00013188653,0.621294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97407216,0.0016744426,0.0018875856,0.0030694853,0.00012922878,0.000026920714,0.00002542536,0.000057119345,0.019057568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949014,0.0033724,0.00004982385,0.00027974448,0.00074311055,0.0006534146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946373,0.0038481473,0.00027035442,0.0003206756,0.0004120082,0.0005115024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065264306,0.000614996,0.00038623146,0.0025231855,0.022166776,0.01432727,0.001937445,0.0026591897,0.0053736535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005269593,0.00022942881,0.0002003341,0.002629816,0.09245703,0.0061675096,0.008333977,0.005354771,0.000501537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151908225,0.000011463006,0.00053665263,0.0000716934,0.0000023613686,0.00030298834,0.3704659,0.00011745305,0.00022270059,0.6145043,0.0054298113,0.008319512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052353703,0.000009775588,0.0010201568,0.0003514697,0.0000054283346,0.00024342138,0.61522573,0.00031968098,0.0003339927,0.110568315,0.27190006,0.000016671867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1946116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33959675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1946116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027021818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019286081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3869577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280572667","doi":"10.3138/cras-2021-014","title":"<i>Mad Men</i> and the Falling Bodies of 9/11","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Uncanny; Falling (accident); Falling in love; Synecdoche; Representation (politics); Politics; Contradiction; Sociology; History; Aesthetics; Literature; Law; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Psychology; Metonymy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0502513681069102,"score_gpt":0.2785036659296645,"score_spread":0.22825229782275433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280572667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09620011,0.02962005,0.002034681,0.1847134,0.0055953218,0.000030200736,0.000059365564,0.00008175877,0.6816651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88513595,0.006676473,0.0005197528,0.025280293,0.0016581869,0.000021771304,0.000022808605,0.000079358644,0.08060537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811316,0.0011217324,0.000029078672,0.00010972439,0.00036373604,0.00026259082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998201,0.0010867702,0.00022973938,0.00007144495,0.00023459522,0.0001763823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019946888,0.0004536454,0.00018306052,0.0012429677,0.015417145,0.0061929924,0.0006246861,0.002522001,0.005815511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002612916,0.00021909857,0.00016146971,0.0008521654,0.02645644,0.0041244444,0.00323674,0.005979832,0.0009123433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003418994,0.000026570026,0.0009525553,0.00015963499,0.000007886998,0.00049827993,0.4278029,0.000032756016,0.00055362226,0.48511755,0.066653326,0.018160772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005290853,0.000026829324,0.0015025754,0.0003529246,0.000009112789,0.0003475097,0.20023786,0.00004076457,0.00066691416,0.009773664,0.78701776,0.000018765611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032545146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069107145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032545146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002370201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06471145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280595972","doi":"10.32920/19583902","title":"A Sentiment Analysis of The First Nations Water Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Narrative; Indigenous; Representation (politics); Colonialism; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics; Art; Law; Literature","score_opus":0.05318816259864277,"score_gpt":0.2691467968649273,"score_spread":0.21595863426628453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280595972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90658987,0.00061640394,0.0048656166,0.0036835202,0.0005006446,0.00014337692,0.0043675024,0.00008696673,0.07914625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805876,0.00052549946,0.0039892658,0.00030288042,0.00024453684,0.0001290798,0.0024380486,0.00009875716,0.011684259],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994174,0.00028264898,0.000028719247,0.000052984175,0.00015758183,0.00006063148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829835,0.0008771065,0.0002034414,0.00006876944,0.00048097005,0.00007135489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011310293,0.00018416964,0.00013516794,0.001886347,0.0010687811,0.0014762298,0.00014711944,0.00032342138,0.0037747642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034784188,0.000087336775,0.00016084676,0.002409015,0.0006121268,0.0011622449,0.0007159154,0.00053371803,0.00055950554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001530248,0.00028576882,0.09591434,0.0017637932,0.00015710197,0.0034756581,0.31522372,0.0018035758,0.08615459,0.06177406,0.14342217,0.288495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044591663,0.0001959141,0.24904615,0.0005028398,0.0000792904,0.00076560443,0.31519902,0.014576457,0.01064721,0.010059953,0.39879954,0.00008349909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050493344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068555134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087538303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038118343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01262784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280635193","doi":"10.24093/awejtls/vol6no2.1","title":"“A National Literature of Irrationalism”: Horror and the Weird as Foundations for an American Literature Survey Course","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arab World English Journal For Translation and Literary Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Declaration of independence; Context (archaeology); American literature; Course (navigation); Canadian literature; Independence (probability theory); Literature; Declaration; Sociology; History; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Political science; Constitution","score_opus":0.10317494375639984,"score_gpt":0.3500022458984334,"score_spread":0.24682730214203352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280635193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3583209,0.0023781576,0.020072944,0.18322036,0.003648503,0.00044955852,0.00007898455,0.00035627198,0.43147436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87288016,0.0013076814,0.020213671,0.014908549,0.00039876043,0.00053889444,0.000085498694,0.000100589335,0.0895662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978465,0.0014822881,0.000051140567,0.00013285504,0.0002480745,0.00023922391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944431,0.002503824,0.00021569015,0.00031366275,0.0005804787,0.0019431793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066753533,0.00021957538,0.00030091227,0.0006828617,0.008138724,0.0052893185,0.0010760183,0.0013164788,0.007330266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007115369,0.000289323,0.00018680873,0.0005776935,0.006680338,0.0040317103,0.0049676257,0.006045298,0.0011145694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009021173,0.001481456,0.010841184,0.00020767732,0.0000048451284,0.0007166313,0.16818608,0.00036480933,0.002490885,0.48370892,0.18445233,0.14745493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033050266,0.00027656136,0.009153228,0.00074503233,0.000010670044,0.00033450045,0.13368693,0.0010972727,0.0016129066,0.0854238,0.767593,0.000033020024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00435855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026234567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008138724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004559911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014150065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035303056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281478548","doi":"10.32920/ifmj.v2i2.1593","title":"Listening to Radiation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interactive Film and Media Journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Active listening; Context (archaeology); Object (grammar); Perception; Computer science; Interfacing; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Communication; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.031088490621388493,"score_gpt":0.2662012938503182,"score_spread":0.23511280322892972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281478548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03277289,0.0094947545,0.021045355,0.03627833,0.003847703,0.000083752166,0.00026425428,0.00053731125,0.89567566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.721286,0.011749513,0.007735944,0.023441447,0.0032781733,0.00024796368,0.0004162312,0.0007273275,0.23111747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997591,0.0012710164,0.000070685484,0.0003361891,0.0004666422,0.0002645303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971693,0.0016248497,0.00020674735,0.00029229437,0.00036563218,0.00034114046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018275767,0.00057566725,0.00032470262,0.0009012012,0.003411237,0.008094618,0.0009828167,0.002930334,0.032196835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093894545,0.00023708896,0.00052000006,0.00055403484,0.00776799,0.0073589743,0.0056098737,0.0032438429,0.007958309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018977301,0.000088077424,0.0033592344,0.0008384901,0.000048110935,0.0010830682,0.288025,0.00042740323,0.0062315334,0.38332888,0.11350914,0.20287138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012481074,0.00006432533,0.0017024713,0.00047383254,0.000019590088,0.00081149314,0.04828236,0.00018349463,0.0008622066,0.03746759,0.9100788,0.000041438023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015762277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015371859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032196835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014171279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001019564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10770917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281485789","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198833932.013.19","title":"“My Business is to Love”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Consolation; Scholarship; Affect (linguistics); Faith; Literature; Relation (database); Friendship; Set (abstract data type); Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.06070906838874854,"score_gpt":0.20753182116381738,"score_spread":0.14682275277506884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281485789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030961078,0.0074869078,0.00422492,0.046781443,0.0026148604,0.00003086967,0.00004473752,0.000097470205,0.9077577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69682634,0.0039219656,0.0020589088,0.0072306735,0.0010454108,0.000045109577,0.000034782595,0.0000942564,0.28874254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885917,0.000719761,0.000018362201,0.00010153766,0.00021749362,0.00008361896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989235,0.0006595522,0.00006000217,0.00007751037,0.0001227598,0.00015662274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008407195,0.00022239408,0.00013309903,0.00042243517,0.004227964,0.004546129,0.00038603524,0.0009113763,0.009477281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024574006,0.0000770188,0.000089830064,0.0004968215,0.009772311,0.0031282934,0.0018286627,0.0032082133,0.0025880642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028676812,0.000029092702,0.00058066,0.00013031557,0.0000036932377,0.00030579147,0.07271765,0.00006698329,0.0005237119,0.73542774,0.14542603,0.044759657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002173749,0.000019379071,0.0004488607,0.0001320042,0.0000015186434,0.0002975362,0.020087268,0.0000755666,0.00022353097,0.022817167,0.95588946,0.0000054940574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082606403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00163127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009477281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012659795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009580125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031704664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281776265","doi":"10.31542/muse.v6i1.2255","title":"I'm Just a Rhetorical Dirtbag, Baby","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student eJournal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Pejorative; Rhetorical question; Aesthetics; Reputation; Impartiality; Decorum; Ideology; Deception; Sociology; Literature; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Art; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.06725285271786643,"score_gpt":0.2595992098301053,"score_spread":0.19234635711223888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281776265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063903606,0.028578576,0.020823512,0.40882364,0.05388522,0.00012564953,0.00027438454,0.0011759351,0.47992274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19045538,0.014151435,0.021816097,0.1249215,0.0124475425,0.00020860853,0.0002526572,0.0020039056,0.63374287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691796,0.0013024616,0.00008342342,0.0004391132,0.00093745807,0.00031964038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944272,0.0022816497,0.00043003145,0.0006067369,0.0015956997,0.0006586506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004927944,0.0006947046,0.0006623978,0.001470196,0.008171307,0.009639136,0.0010558305,0.0039928053,0.021003582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016427262,0.0004442177,0.00046142287,0.0010839222,0.012985468,0.0128142275,0.0038573546,0.010859071,0.015964469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008399009,0.00003231529,0.00054638146,0.00025338292,0.000015919702,0.00022150589,0.012513352,0.00006775956,0.00093890243,0.37700632,0.5563894,0.051930737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008251325,0.00003366667,0.00030794868,0.00028534044,0.000010220763,0.00027332822,0.0034539618,0.00012902776,0.00039945423,0.019191902,0.97588307,0.000023916085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004914536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008178034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021003582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027952527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023569323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07026398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282962950","doi":"10.24908/ss.v20i2.15624","title":"Review of Stoddart’s The Common Gaze: Surveillance and the Common Good","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Gaze; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03143658379090941,"score_gpt":0.2626880953228871,"score_spread":0.2312515115319777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282962950","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011473414,0.9820877,0.000109857116,0.0128369015,0.0013058197,0.0000030001302,0.000017814325,0.000002364551,0.003521807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004000787,0.98415226,0.00018208205,0.006459224,0.003952164,0.000012063897,0.000032810152,0.000012501045,0.0011960294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742883,0.0013038955,0.0002778128,0.00025742073,0.00058773893,0.00014433797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97834516,0.017739503,0.00077078317,0.00037987335,0.0022836386,0.00048099278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00544641,0.00096369325,0.0016799571,0.00882334,0.0017908725,0.006141403,0.0016624707,0.00509804,0.007219737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018998127,0.00051995594,0.00048171586,0.010982637,0.008695357,0.0077531887,0.0025236977,0.0047333827,0.001923776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000814278,0.00005025624,0.00034545187,0.015021416,0.00009570432,0.0002226298,0.005291597,0.00022970121,0.00019273823,0.22012019,0.38389716,0.37445176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065421623,0.000015381745,0.0005686809,0.013931056,0.00002707284,0.0002322797,0.0009058603,0.000029297604,0.00005088032,0.011831846,0.9723846,0.000016471542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014153951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026457299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014153951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049018366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00912935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035565495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282964797","doi":"10.47369/eidea-22-1-3413","title":"Rhetoric and interdisciplinarity: a conversation with Christopher Tindale","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetoric; Conversation; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019329345287582227,"score_gpt":0.24026521531395129,"score_spread":0.22093587002636905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282964797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07771794,0.022166397,0.00582122,0.80788636,0.006246896,0.0001336305,0.000047288897,0.000060326904,0.07992001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80813074,0.016442582,0.0063028936,0.12966321,0.0022667944,0.00036399567,0.000034984063,0.00024971066,0.03654502],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795877,0.014922689,0.00027816414,0.0013614492,0.0023342364,0.0015157518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541962,0.038252622,0.0011609519,0.00046608897,0.002727172,0.0031969887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019437794,0.00086338614,0.0014869269,0.0030705724,0.029593496,0.014441248,0.0032764613,0.01210903,0.0027604618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04233735,0.0010217187,0.0006232659,0.0041651167,0.039285395,0.018918602,0.007915724,0.02481949,0.0004618572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039089417,0.000053587853,0.0005212077,0.00015692055,0.000010397162,0.0016941633,0.7460017,0.00017801601,0.000426218,0.17716241,0.06593303,0.00782328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001963807,0.000048636542,0.000591219,0.0009759273,0.0000113026035,0.0014601571,0.4784383,0.00046789952,0.0003042184,0.015760427,0.5018164,0.00010593696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03580085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047531486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03580085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0159004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133320205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11536604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283803397","doi":"10.25071/2563-3694.64","title":"White Supremacy in Rainbow","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Sociology Journal of Critical Praxis","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Irvine","keywords":"Pride; Solidarity; White supremacy; Political science; Gender studies; Performative utterance; Sociology; Aesthetics; Media studies; Political economy; Politics; Law; Racism; Art","score_opus":0.057481514944364064,"score_gpt":0.32096752286766844,"score_spread":0.2634860079233044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283803397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13649397,0.004800199,0.013262235,0.049440302,0.0021747905,0.000076417055,0.000032639546,0.00016852807,0.79355085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9310404,0.00071414304,0.0017913362,0.008409215,0.00045756134,0.000060537503,0.000013299771,0.00013810971,0.05737521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953472,0.00256907,0.00010869416,0.0006951946,0.00072840764,0.00055148883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635774,0.0024577465,0.0002812357,0.00030974956,0.00030702853,0.00028639231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077511678,0.00051448954,0.00039484503,0.0012809023,0.015421019,0.008524415,0.00075655396,0.0031603752,0.0062399283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008292587,0.0002982091,0.00037138347,0.00072239083,0.04051039,0.009684081,0.009602883,0.0062142033,0.0007043751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020432006,0.000011217596,0.00021172228,0.000044910154,0.0000039077436,0.00019048437,0.122441135,0.000045946766,0.00036106343,0.86773574,0.003642378,0.0052911346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002297005,0.000099349985,0.0011018346,0.00054996106,0.000023207967,0.00029539506,0.10756134,0.0004327328,0.0022463514,0.28088176,0.6067389,0.00004616882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043236203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060765976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015421019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004992298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025748608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040992558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284668844","doi":"10.1080/01639374.2022.2090039","title":"Misrepresentation in the Surrogate: Author Critiques of “Indians of North America” Subject Headings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cataloging & Classification Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Subject (documents); Subject access; Library science; History; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08102582978405094,"score_gpt":0.29817713818686065,"score_spread":0.21715130840280972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284668844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76679796,0.002368446,0.011736858,0.041530315,0.0016829701,0.00008325924,0.000102670354,0.00017867492,0.17551881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98435104,0.00039748126,0.0017295207,0.001871146,0.00020776041,0.000029963056,0.000034028344,0.00017105739,0.011207936],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627106,0.028814811,0.0010219063,0.0014739495,0.004982594,0.0009961169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9126951,0.06225223,0.0076232124,0.006890914,0.008821186,0.0017174104],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026596112,0.00043436023,0.0005236267,0.004217458,0.012767726,0.010971958,0.0012818364,0.0023592308,0.0032273738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07444225,0.00047615083,0.00026445536,0.004292029,0.020951023,0.0069921715,0.00714539,0.005678148,0.0005318784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013394193,0.0000058843552,0.0012414184,0.000037880298,0.0000027241997,0.00030695996,0.9694335,0.000021576445,0.0005137559,0.020652557,0.00315507,0.004615333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006995348,0.00002342193,0.0025984517,0.00042212216,0.000015932479,0.000644433,0.7877037,0.00038986548,0.0015212263,0.0062458245,0.20039664,0.00003145942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0115668755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02200157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98902804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074938154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005580568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1406554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285129277","doi":"10.25158/l11.1.6","title":"Review of <i>Dear Science and Other Stories</i> by Katherine McKittrick (Duke University Press)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lateral","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Art history; Art; Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03454834596813916,"score_gpt":0.23298708647878935,"score_spread":0.1984387405106502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285129277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002318107,0.94103646,0.0001263515,0.027242184,0.019337904,0.000010791662,0.00006622981,0.000011487489,0.011936822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045279986,0.9514384,0.00020445678,0.015678229,0.01477699,0.00004139863,0.00015158826,0.000043605818,0.013137274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834085,0.00060371164,0.00013823835,0.00013276312,0.0006284143,0.00015597779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98978335,0.005520886,0.00048205044,0.00024301907,0.0031479718,0.0008227829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002432596,0.0009896896,0.0010795704,0.0066961045,0.003270213,0.0052606105,0.0015873066,0.002782724,0.012856968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008459902,0.00050318014,0.0003977282,0.008036498,0.003833006,0.0053983065,0.0024689024,0.0037480996,0.00505453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010876957,0.000013036413,0.000088101464,0.0017900486,0.0000075958965,0.00011099406,0.0015543657,0.000035342313,0.000070242626,0.0049265227,0.9122387,0.079154186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.768546e-7,0.00000381348,0.00037597807,0.0021208087,0.0000026096902,0.00010457748,0.0006821182,0.0000061780584,0.000015550713,0.0003030451,0.9963792,0.0000051862235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03140112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059626356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03140112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004697799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006932681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0624367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285466287","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469661100.003.0005","title":"Lenny’s Epiphany","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of North Carolina Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drummer; Epiphany; The arctic; History; Bay; Art history; Geography; Art; Archaeology; Visual arts; Oceanography","score_opus":0.06866596935160248,"score_gpt":0.19673570328959428,"score_spread":0.12806973393799181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285466287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005567885,0.015499222,0.0009983019,0.013612242,0.002225342,0.000017826129,0.000034540906,0.000075362215,0.9619692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10587943,0.00855262,0.0010368256,0.009844228,0.00072718103,0.000041509404,0.000051423944,0.00018969271,0.8736771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995103,0.00016464463,0.00000996141,0.000081215665,0.00015330841,0.00008055037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980897,0.00008329277,0.000012773189,0.000020111343,0.00003603405,0.0000388592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044677724,0.00052078126,0.00029030474,0.0010475896,0.005992392,0.004056508,0.0005183331,0.0012801406,0.016196253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009853035,0.00023085863,0.0002126496,0.0007240784,0.0049835346,0.00506196,0.0030059402,0.0038246003,0.0039178054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033119453,0.00002861339,0.0003853437,0.00021030066,0.0000045663132,0.0005332877,0.04464882,0.00006968054,0.00068936055,0.55420035,0.3321367,0.06705995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.628724e-7,0.0000047661574,0.000113906506,0.00011349619,0.0000010659103,0.00023572936,0.0035304837,0.000020906971,0.00009631497,0.004634877,0.99124473,0.0000029536282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006275106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020932222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016196253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033920184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017794941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054181874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289712466","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.18.3.01","title":"Influence Work, Resistance, and Educational Life-Worlds: Quintilian’s [Marcus Fabius Quintilianus] (35-95 CE) Analysis of Roman Oratory as an Instructive Ethnohistorical Resource and Conceptual Precursor of Symbolic Interactionist Scholarship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Scholarship; Rhetoric; Symbolic interactionism; Resistance (ecology); Epistemology; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08110499421361825,"score_gpt":0.3819371489470781,"score_spread":0.3008321547334598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289712466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18356785,0.08025627,0.037887968,0.099291205,0.00095009466,0.00022704311,0.00015783151,0.00013674273,0.59752506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787552,0.005076017,0.0028708149,0.0022337565,0.00022842622,0.0001043118,0.000017978648,0.00003625713,0.010677149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981958,0.0011734137,0.000039836556,0.00023180452,0.00022283368,0.00013626396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986376,0.0010480698,0.00011865572,0.00006404073,0.00007380286,0.00005777245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028250753,0.00046133774,0.00034420713,0.0020194694,0.0058708936,0.0043992167,0.0010098866,0.0020362032,0.0019897674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037401414,0.00025121073,0.00024762045,0.001526603,0.034058236,0.005695264,0.003982164,0.0027772207,0.00019549008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015026251,0.000009432755,0.0003051623,0.00006651952,0.0000029894372,0.00018144638,0.18102741,0.000104323546,0.00016352201,0.8054093,0.0030527902,0.009662062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024973519,0.00006140079,0.0028109853,0.00068675604,0.000013605163,0.0006556717,0.060525954,0.0005611927,0.000591966,0.36034662,0.57367796,0.000042892378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013854186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012323772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013854186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051340065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018112342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037249982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293078411","doi":"10.32920/19519726","title":"Sentiment Analysis: The Water Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Narrative; Politics; Colonialism; Political science; Empathy; Mythology; Perspective (graphical); Political economy; Sociology; History; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Art; Literature; Ecology","score_opus":0.06743890541001453,"score_gpt":0.27741872624770225,"score_spread":0.20997982083768774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293078411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6107897,0.0046902555,0.019367686,0.043644153,0.0041151918,0.00047592414,0.008802927,0.00020703852,0.30790713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592986,0.00259244,0.006311951,0.0029972675,0.0011487914,0.00026170982,0.0031172077,0.00021781611,0.02405417],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778324,0.0012070056,0.00009085628,0.00016664938,0.00057667977,0.00017556117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951212,0.0029049793,0.0004278054,0.00016842652,0.0012318993,0.00014568123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034564033,0.00030563262,0.0002595482,0.0018577584,0.0019508185,0.0028681199,0.00025178623,0.00062162324,0.005813932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009488451,0.000097546144,0.00026672622,0.0031226124,0.001445618,0.0023596338,0.0012870615,0.0011070215,0.0010408137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006233928,0.00011339383,0.033489775,0.0021487812,0.000110331275,0.0013337386,0.284597,0.00090167235,0.01670332,0.13486381,0.2514515,0.27366328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029122504,0.000059357924,0.045298737,0.0007948101,0.00005679989,0.00046981534,0.2828469,0.0061304034,0.0038183734,0.022715596,0.6377086,0.00007151368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009525913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009356797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009525913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022706762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012381679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019449532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293081146","doi":"10.1525/aft.2006.33.6.20","title":"Democracy’s Promise and the Politics of Worldliness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Afterimage","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Politics; Citation; Download; Democracy; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.016576545721977032,"score_gpt":0.2195834618959212,"score_spread":0.20300691617394417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293081146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011002723,0.024836008,0.0004692292,0.3539381,0.0017146678,0.000009738365,0.000087224624,0.000018903913,0.60792345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8746118,0.01198825,0.00021846396,0.016891351,0.0038853928,0.000030062765,0.000039722083,0.000048556878,0.092286445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659,0.0019332861,0.000067650995,0.00029325305,0.0005714303,0.0005444536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957783,0.0027869076,0.00038626327,0.00020837232,0.00042459168,0.00041547298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00394592,0.00037667502,0.00037697126,0.0010248164,0.00796479,0.012780805,0.00052233157,0.005882435,0.009590202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00838751,0.00023550782,0.0002942583,0.0014633044,0.021283587,0.006161731,0.0024559328,0.005468896,0.0012612891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001682675,0.0000103507155,0.0002282406,0.000034882098,0.000003990313,0.000056687906,0.004047128,0.000080261016,0.000039155322,0.9138847,0.077953026,0.0036448424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028308143,0.000020028658,0.0018564909,0.0004991555,0.000009919123,0.00009353254,0.010295196,0.00016773117,0.00013526753,0.3394319,0.6474426,0.000019861804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008249655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010599977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012780805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011977131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004153395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08690059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294982840","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395699.013.38","title":"Editor’s Introduction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Style (visual arts); Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Biography; History; Art history; Literature; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03428978943601807,"score_gpt":0.19446042421677612,"score_spread":0.16017063478075805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294982840","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024352908,0.012361903,0.0012848113,0.054694377,0.82585,0.00009077637,0.0008843273,0.0004664332,0.1041238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003769598,0.016890312,0.0020089266,0.043965027,0.41285643,0.00018013905,0.0010219021,0.0007996999,0.51850796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763656,0.0002823254,0.00018263132,0.00037307202,0.0013145932,0.00021077787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904288,0.0020978283,0.0004089974,0.0005004641,0.0053871707,0.0011767291],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002032832,0.001374076,0.0009821324,0.0028084032,0.0018257431,0.0053345654,0.0024350884,0.0037415114,0.19322309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013399378,0.00045519264,0.0009255304,0.0014099845,0.0011160127,0.004195077,0.002276528,0.005586504,0.103259064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063400935,0.0000073543706,0.000021483615,0.00012427356,0.0000015938909,0.00004023244,0.000021227292,0.000025247944,0.000051817224,0.0014694588,0.98139316,0.016837781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019408626,0.0000048610787,0.000042810287,0.00014590735,0.0000013653081,0.00005222366,0.000014659644,0.00001601673,0.000037104834,0.000522774,0.9991573,0.000003180591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010032305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017645059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8067769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020993634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030139305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6463956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297815549","doi":"10.46692/9781847422569.003","title":"Sir Keith Joseph and the cycle speech","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Speech recognition; Linguistics; History; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032758249676240886,"score_gpt":0.25114815268936247,"score_spread":0.21838990301312158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297815549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001967996,0.050541427,0.0003774577,0.75772685,0.048666697,0.000028226343,0.00019164007,0.000041432264,0.14045833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08746407,0.039221965,0.00058389886,0.35542116,0.044380076,0.0001064748,0.00026347602,0.00019328606,0.47236562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975128,0.0009162315,0.000082226106,0.00031287308,0.0008642485,0.0003116717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953501,0.002188916,0.00027415267,0.00018671303,0.00081657845,0.0011833844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022355076,0.00040377473,0.00030627492,0.0009040263,0.0029124331,0.005823208,0.00095092156,0.0052109696,0.036001563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015809782,0.0003104838,0.0001745162,0.00082995015,0.0035803006,0.0045619304,0.0027368236,0.005949106,0.005579137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012776862,0.0000064999062,0.00023940754,0.000040760635,0.0000012388762,0.00006766809,0.00097464304,0.000016149817,0.000026416466,0.027718276,0.95582885,0.015067312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020464993,0.000004707184,0.00021126427,0.00008877248,5.447683e-7,0.000089417044,0.00068404916,0.000009107213,0.000014630211,0.0026290722,0.9962626,0.0000037069863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010386882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102860145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036001563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035053303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034548433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120437205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297989458","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10234212","title":"Anniversary Narratives of the Health Care State: Institutional Entrenchment in Retrospect","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; State (computer science); Political science; Health care; Art; Literature; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04140617655628047,"score_gpt":0.3221079815755998,"score_spread":0.2807018050193193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297989458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49263525,0.008960442,0.011713516,0.0794835,0.00091127475,0.0000649718,0.00010612249,0.00009364929,0.40603125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915895,0.00057376584,0.0003860463,0.0012485746,0.00007295334,0.000015983916,0.000014419581,0.000024840541,0.006073937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990918,0.0061400672,0.00025575695,0.0004752696,0.001220153,0.0009908191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989394,0.008068901,0.00075878954,0.00053474953,0.00072519266,0.00051830173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010318229,0.00029232248,0.00034602376,0.0014211755,0.018362826,0.012324724,0.0010315134,0.0025089812,0.003106581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016998276,0.000418227,0.0002180349,0.0015784994,0.04475141,0.012316827,0.009075667,0.006395077,0.00022729722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016514745,0.000006237127,0.0006771504,0.00003412734,0.0000035076214,0.0002191324,0.4879488,0.000066023145,0.00015065532,0.5022365,0.0024426936,0.0061986404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065363924,0.000027357997,0.0016446295,0.0004824357,0.000012596571,0.00029436065,0.5850155,0.00030129423,0.0006491931,0.0830405,0.32848597,0.000039754323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018672813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024545655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018672813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014453189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006140612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10486573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300411693","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.17.1.0088","title":"The Rhetorical Transformation of the Masses from Malthus’s “Redundant Population” into Marx’s “Industrial Reserve Army”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Population; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Rhetorical device; Politics; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Political science; Linguistics; Demography","score_opus":0.10585633871295512,"score_gpt":0.2742022453401618,"score_spread":0.16834590662720667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300411693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15205313,0.0067234575,0.08482505,0.10039255,0.0027793918,0.0001537335,0.00011609505,0.0002971713,0.6526594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98718274,0.0005312533,0.0031390912,0.0016087542,0.000363971,0.000044221677,0.000015650241,0.0000707172,0.0070437174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99033374,0.007443176,0.00016011724,0.00039402762,0.0013482999,0.0003206564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99168384,0.0061760293,0.000474526,0.0007515553,0.00074870593,0.00016535385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00924395,0.0004777978,0.00042521404,0.0025254355,0.0050782515,0.006209296,0.000977647,0.0019843583,0.0035021254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016637696,0.00025875482,0.00027236927,0.001382324,0.037293524,0.010247799,0.0046737655,0.0042954218,0.000568761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141015935,0.0000054235315,0.00004366381,0.000023457793,0.0000014250732,0.00004215864,0.020167554,0.00006396662,0.0002306934,0.97466236,0.0013558248,0.003389326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003642141,0.00007676413,0.0004160692,0.00035648473,0.000018242767,0.00026389144,0.023953551,0.0015389358,0.0020491832,0.6898295,0.28142536,0.00003562137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001994109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010665826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00924395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066493438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022777186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048887253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302007442","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2022.2061582","title":"Chronotopic Expertise: Enacting Water Ontologies in a Wind Energy Debate in Ontario, Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sociology; Technoscience; Appropriation; Ontology; Foregrounding; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025284406809527496,"score_gpt":0.20433786784472754,"score_spread":0.17905346103520003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302007442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51283246,0.0033142366,0.0041678087,0.10080098,0.00062682683,0.00014399675,0.00019014034,0.000062541614,0.37786108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755972,0.00075187936,0.0007661738,0.0026650403,0.000035015175,0.000020207428,0.000031840354,0.000031142015,0.02010148],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949157,0.0014542389,0.00017251595,0.00054599677,0.0017104313,0.0012010538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898234,0.0052878545,0.0004956135,0.0002514986,0.0030248896,0.0011167575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006241522,0.00033924633,0.00045755986,0.002293698,0.051097754,0.009085222,0.0015082324,0.0034573607,0.0038693375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112069715,0.00040758456,0.0002411162,0.003794526,0.02834067,0.0047530723,0.006046416,0.0045235935,0.00020091009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005858482,0.000022501343,0.0046321386,0.00011626829,0.000012463558,0.0017321721,0.73509175,0.00043328034,0.0010748318,0.22405638,0.018379267,0.014390419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024540615,0.000017241699,0.007294165,0.00025640358,0.000023945287,0.0001408864,0.54875493,0.0008423152,0.00070929516,0.016661087,0.4252025,0.00007260973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98523915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94890225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20500024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16163667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9220871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302012022","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649165","title":"Wiped Off the Map Disturbing Toronto's Draft Biodiversity Strategy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Rhetorical question; Neoliberalism (international relations); Work (physics); Natural (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Geography; Engineering; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07830620170894664,"score_gpt":0.2634825636772372,"score_spread":0.18517636196829057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302012022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25392443,0.0047723674,0.018269826,0.21448518,0.0022091174,0.00025814222,0.0011283262,0.0005534628,0.5043991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077486,0.0013134287,0.0063467827,0.005382975,0.000107611566,0.00006223258,0.00019911787,0.00017057722,0.07866881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958246,0.001022326,0.00012563849,0.00027896935,0.0019215045,0.0008271195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931686,0.0024157295,0.00031042122,0.0004655022,0.0026463675,0.0009933878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004511103,0.00043585466,0.00024575953,0.0015455921,0.01821793,0.009695213,0.0011118228,0.002488818,0.005427427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091810925,0.00035417068,0.00029969262,0.001988884,0.014391998,0.0033444085,0.004412245,0.0031744584,0.0005107944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000803463,0.000020332383,0.005729942,0.0002781897,0.000026114194,0.0008087448,0.21843323,0.0019741321,0.001995943,0.57842976,0.14362495,0.04859827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001100869,0.00002305676,0.0046816883,0.00016042063,0.000028987,0.000093542905,0.065287165,0.00081854285,0.0012082458,0.018105611,0.90952516,0.000056449462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9320339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97901493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13161229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13161229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113605924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95491844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302012039","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649165.v1","title":"Wiped Off the Map Disturbing Toronto's Draft Biodiversity Strategy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Rhetorical question; Neoliberalism (international relations); Work (physics); Natural (archaeology); Political science; Software deployment; Sociology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Geography; Engineering; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07830620170894664,"score_gpt":0.2634825636772372,"score_spread":0.18517636196829057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302012039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25392443,0.0047723674,0.018269826,0.21448518,0.0022091174,0.00025814222,0.0011283262,0.0005534628,0.5043991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077486,0.0013134287,0.0063467827,0.005382975,0.000107611566,0.00006223258,0.00019911787,0.00017057722,0.07866881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958246,0.001022326,0.00012563849,0.00027896935,0.0019215045,0.0008271195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931686,0.0024157295,0.00031042122,0.0004655022,0.0026463675,0.0009933878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004511103,0.00043585466,0.00024575953,0.0015455921,0.01821793,0.009695213,0.0011118228,0.002488818,0.005427427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091810925,0.00035417068,0.00029969262,0.001988884,0.014391998,0.0033444085,0.004412245,0.0031744584,0.0005107944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000803463,0.000020332383,0.005729942,0.0002781897,0.000026114194,0.0008087448,0.21843323,0.0019741321,0.001995943,0.57842976,0.14362495,0.04859827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001100869,0.00002305676,0.0046816883,0.00016042063,0.000028987,0.000093542905,0.065287165,0.00081854285,0.0012082458,0.018105611,0.90952516,0.000056449462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9320339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97901493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13161229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13161229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113605924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95491844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302307745","doi":"10.3138/cjc.2022-0043","title":"Becoming Invisible to/and Still Not Belong: Rethinking the Dwelling of BIPOC Scholars at the Physical and Disciplinary Margins of Communication Studies in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Discipline; Construct (python library); Sociology; Class (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Erasure; Gender studies; Social psychology; Media studies; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11580794888289209,"score_gpt":0.29709981111677297,"score_spread":0.18129186223388088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302307745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9500387,0.0019448922,0.0008518515,0.01836184,0.00025885206,0.000069267284,0.000114303126,0.000034091932,0.028326135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929628,0.0005555681,0.0003358864,0.0010431843,0.000019143294,0.000018833945,0.000025546395,0.000040390423,0.004998628],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087954,0.0025396645,0.0002224477,0.00093784655,0.0020842275,0.003336227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793235,0.00628438,0.0013250327,0.0006986888,0.0048443554,0.0075240186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097511215,0.00051284686,0.00092243723,0.0050164256,0.07477288,0.022311285,0.0051315594,0.0029169468,0.006259996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019632496,0.0005070176,0.0003717533,0.0055907755,0.044686507,0.0061472766,0.01806249,0.0060034962,0.00033560168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017686123,0.000007653802,0.0031078043,0.000030897256,0.0000023366786,0.00024055637,0.9881402,0.0000104815,0.0002206253,0.0035955007,0.0007962613,0.0038299335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.944883e-7,0.000004445051,0.0022298505,0.000061238745,0.0000032903877,0.000030452145,0.9867806,0.000022099333,0.000058873018,0.00025862514,0.010539865,0.000009886638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97106016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86827624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13172373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19965209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95572704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308017478","doi":"10.25071/2564-2855.14","title":"Framing the pandemic in the political discourse of Justin Trudeau and Donald Trump","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Ideology; Politics; Topos theory; Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Public discourse; Underpinning; Media studies; Political science; Law; History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.04146565371006239,"score_gpt":0.2688262668147031,"score_spread":0.22736061310464073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308017478","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19585586,0.028657416,0.012480971,0.60009295,0.0043317666,0.00008328032,0.00007267331,0.000103887476,0.15832126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680005,0.0047403434,0.002818388,0.012946952,0.00074418634,0.00009513247,0.00002343631,0.000117894015,0.010513091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98818064,0.010009136,0.00011278769,0.0004061871,0.00094596145,0.00034540324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97768813,0.020139338,0.00054572005,0.0002649402,0.000969304,0.00039264155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008690331,0.00041512577,0.00046050758,0.0016206384,0.009996671,0.0099284565,0.0010173726,0.0032744608,0.0013370037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019896092,0.0003821201,0.000194667,0.0014633336,0.030926917,0.008337553,0.0049198605,0.0053078076,0.00021869178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050213435,0.000016177382,0.0003462035,0.00009796572,0.000007987577,0.00033827484,0.29108298,0.0002632675,0.00046210087,0.66741234,0.029464155,0.010458449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030260671,0.000047592646,0.00068234565,0.0006863018,0.000016129177,0.0003606131,0.20228574,0.0011114469,0.00135171,0.1704566,0.62289566,0.000075658354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013577175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015914865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98642284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008543245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050518624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06198585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308593956","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/x4md3","title":"Why I Don't Believe in Bucket Lists","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Aesthetics; The Thing; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science; Art; Philosophy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.08438344968481197,"score_gpt":0.2847474149575346,"score_spread":0.2003639652727226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308593956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03307114,0.006269574,0.019494416,0.3540805,0.0070945877,0.00009716929,0.0004004434,0.0009418641,0.5785503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6522093,0.0030338878,0.0065461732,0.08046507,0.0016004244,0.00010081807,0.00030360682,0.0014580815,0.25428268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940057,0.0026467445,0.0001789314,0.0005843883,0.0016093494,0.0009747987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98721373,0.0050735804,0.001254385,0.0013157175,0.003392288,0.00175027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060936967,0.00041415266,0.000416877,0.00089236005,0.009631955,0.008513674,0.0014669073,0.005391477,0.074826896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02992,0.00051257096,0.00048002606,0.0008483321,0.012014961,0.01782731,0.0037749077,0.0068872306,0.02364477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021519653,0.00006682273,0.0038462023,0.0003382273,0.000040723913,0.0010976184,0.11914485,0.00012490059,0.0012052979,0.30479673,0.520224,0.04889951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031211788,0.000055268716,0.001004286,0.00043532118,0.000019229063,0.00075706374,0.07959701,0.00016481915,0.00061354897,0.0647659,0.852488,0.00006841647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00967403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0126085775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074826896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004155912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002124376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2503209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309377456","doi":"10.1163/15685152-03050006","title":"Response: The Blur of Letters, the Residue of Reception","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biblical Interpretation","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sociality; Conversation; Perception; Meaning (existential); Biblical studies; Aesthetics; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Epistemology; Literature; Art; Communication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04037768851913581,"score_gpt":0.26357526686185667,"score_spread":0.22319757834272086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309377456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06795835,0.0023505306,0.011670493,0.71701944,0.021722393,0.00007174776,0.00023249157,0.00027297562,0.17870156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.789785,0.00090480404,0.0013304382,0.11618444,0.004923574,0.00007406793,0.00006444991,0.00032811466,0.08640508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935893,0.004500341,0.00015311685,0.0005292013,0.0008070865,0.00042097075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885771,0.0077741286,0.000888109,0.00066382764,0.0014702001,0.0006266482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003748256,0.00043255478,0.0003815244,0.0005629312,0.005659973,0.0048419503,0.00075556035,0.0070326794,0.012613019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026977416,0.00020783753,0.00028068852,0.0005620637,0.008479977,0.0047680894,0.00426538,0.010943891,0.0026941395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041334506,0.000036898604,0.0012342017,0.00029767246,0.000020266334,0.0015268049,0.34457347,0.00017116003,0.002871516,0.36989725,0.2592774,0.019680003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029957515,0.00007887952,0.00084128766,0.00040367697,0.000013383194,0.0008227011,0.17320603,0.00024898935,0.0014220736,0.03891592,0.78396875,0.000048355683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025184746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023715736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012613019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002824949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011184983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042194784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309643863","doi":"10.32388/zd15qj","title":"Review of: \"Changing chiropractic’s subluxation rhetoric: Moving on from ‘deniers’, ‘vitalists’, and ‘unorthodox’, to realists, post-realists, and absurdists\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Chiropractic; Rhetoric; Subluxation; Literature; Aesthetics; Political science; Gender studies; Medicine; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Pathology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.07656370642110663,"score_gpt":0.32327634518175125,"score_spread":0.24671263876064461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309643863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007349866,0.08448008,0.0007377507,0.59554857,0.2794132,0.00031302357,0.00084214535,0.00018193324,0.03774825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023090048,0.18700443,0.0021572514,0.33470276,0.26227698,0.0007519275,0.0018809962,0.000442965,0.18769266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872866,0.0033013788,0.001098105,0.00050758204,0.0073642293,0.00044210558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85143584,0.0465584,0.004712083,0.0023779306,0.090681374,0.0042344006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014390827,0.00060797535,0.0012434337,0.004699485,0.0035737948,0.005090126,0.002323366,0.0053633163,0.029875563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09859533,0.00044784404,0.00056273723,0.0025166448,0.0037584193,0.0038759965,0.0023120993,0.004042291,0.014550764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000818166,0.000004064086,0.000028063705,0.00088419043,0.0000044940907,0.000023818833,0.00016522894,0.000009423051,0.000047747257,0.0011597245,0.9835345,0.014130664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008703827,0.000010608059,0.0004315303,0.0026143142,0.000015735228,0.00006301725,0.00025977555,0.000028761375,0.000058983507,0.0007831753,0.99571484,0.000010425108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01003893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02894379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029875563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047118664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02894442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09994376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311233603","doi":"","title":"Fictionality, Factuality, Reflexivity Across Discourses and Media","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06403826936530232,"score_gpt":0.30520174349513807,"score_spread":0.24116347412983574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311233603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3453534,0.020036664,0.094013095,0.021698192,0.00061847595,0.00020353805,0.0008533145,0.000370808,0.51685244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877182,0.0015583842,0.0044236653,0.00020336725,0.00027768128,0.00008967479,0.00023245877,0.00012755548,0.0053690495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98741233,0.007403399,0.0006326743,0.0015689707,0.0024875614,0.0004951104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94939196,0.040426213,0.0029683083,0.0036311604,0.0028677613,0.00071463373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012252795,0.0005390335,0.00075818505,0.007475191,0.0043561403,0.023881923,0.0012004233,0.002998172,0.010547542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052555595,0.0006305667,0.00048708558,0.0066712,0.017629435,0.02211271,0.0050272713,0.0030593826,0.0010093166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075143485,0.00004674753,0.0022475438,0.0003709627,0.00005143788,0.00018226924,0.10152165,0.00021686517,0.0018196158,0.8674853,0.0013719437,0.02461041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052698935,0.00008514863,0.011292066,0.00072745164,0.00010744166,0.0006741743,0.07742277,0.0016640661,0.0031401152,0.83360416,0.071155205,0.000074684314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012150835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006452888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023881923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029948556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017815289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064799726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312659173","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-18802-2_5","title":"Rhetorical Structures, Deliberative Ecologies, and the Conditions for Democratic Argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Deliberation; Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Stipulation; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Action (physics); Sociology; Citizen journalism; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.070908580000833,"score_gpt":0.2797323788161272,"score_spread":0.20882379881529423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312659173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060027707,0.0035426598,0.09396365,0.019102862,0.00022032145,0.000100709796,0.00027550245,0.00019861077,0.82256794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96009815,0.0008446868,0.018473417,0.00052459905,0.00020296877,0.00021342062,0.00018151957,0.00015551636,0.019305741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99116653,0.0054714936,0.00036870854,0.000710186,0.0016200134,0.0006629966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96140856,0.032801624,0.0016669366,0.002365766,0.0011894718,0.00056752557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074764965,0.00041465551,0.0006803559,0.0024951,0.0040707737,0.01296158,0.0012655063,0.0037949297,0.0145214945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03423195,0.0006277927,0.000608464,0.002086692,0.021269446,0.016472494,0.0037061311,0.0043688943,0.0018581765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006192587,0.0000066809152,0.00006222973,0.000019995503,0.000001312062,0.00001116403,0.0005796243,0.00014355412,0.000068462236,0.996863,0.0004024342,0.0018353728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000752584,0.000004037703,0.00010827772,0.000031958065,0.0000016098844,0.000019063005,0.00040393928,0.0003781153,0.00013969521,0.9937556,0.0051467447,0.0000034675347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074751134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011510283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145214945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003314194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032495277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048579276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313000829","doi":"10.1353/bio.2022.0017","title":"Identity Work, Sexuality, and the Reception of Testimony: On Identification with Anne Frank","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Identity (music); Feeling; KISS (TNC); Sympathy; HERO; Psychoanalysis; Identification (biology); Appeal; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Literature; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037753563583101904,"score_gpt":0.24344731020181887,"score_spread":0.20569374661871698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313000829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3864542,0.01925724,0.003760517,0.24844737,0.0052859862,0.00009961589,0.00014602231,0.00008172126,0.33646742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93340033,0.0045177024,0.00078127004,0.022538595,0.0007693718,0.000071527524,0.000027998452,0.00007532236,0.037817907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900323,0.0069641517,0.00023344735,0.00043579863,0.0012261281,0.0011081476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98478055,0.011408269,0.0011607803,0.00055145903,0.0010782252,0.0010206664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070291674,0.000408342,0.000337216,0.0010677639,0.02262494,0.009205455,0.0012431187,0.0059910794,0.0039007324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033135056,0.0004449997,0.00024979777,0.0007995329,0.022470968,0.008041506,0.008528801,0.008345631,0.0007825344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028765558,0.000020028694,0.0007599994,0.000071518196,0.0000045110414,0.0018374148,0.9213587,0.00002486552,0.00039897813,0.04195505,0.026942406,0.006597727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024591877,0.00001836039,0.0011628785,0.0005524523,0.000004938089,0.0011806482,0.7590413,0.000040168037,0.00031042105,0.0028264336,0.23483086,0.000029186524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0165978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039939016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02262494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045090434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032404407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037174225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317555037","doi":"10.3138/md-65-4-1162","title":"Staging Socrates: The Public Intellectual and Democracy in Maxwell Anderson’s<i>Barefoot in Athens</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Politics; Democracy; Silence; Barefoot; Parallels; White (mutation); Law; Sociology; History; Political science; Media studies; Literature; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.055716220258974006,"score_gpt":0.2378814376048665,"score_spread":0.18216521734589247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317555037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24673201,0.005703895,0.0010694554,0.060709573,0.001772166,0.000030269983,0.00006698892,0.00009303471,0.6838226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92494345,0.00068702886,0.0002802377,0.0040988685,0.0002966974,0.000014468091,0.000012308266,0.000052644715,0.06961428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999073,0.0004523395,0.000011449331,0.00007116082,0.00012246781,0.00026961826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995598,0.00017947979,0.000048734906,0.000030251533,0.00003843325,0.00014321377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095604116,0.00038090735,0.00017259756,0.0010503688,0.015718855,0.006862471,0.00058318034,0.0018692866,0.0044451165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015049779,0.00020707911,0.0001444293,0.0005958226,0.016926201,0.0024748705,0.0031297556,0.0039017699,0.0005619697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045945268,0.00004261137,0.00074741046,0.000058310976,0.000005683754,0.00058997516,0.29974687,0.00012034935,0.00042980586,0.5996356,0.086647816,0.011929686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008387111,0.000019170058,0.0014976966,0.00014958395,0.0000044784183,0.00030763831,0.09070935,0.0001256161,0.00049718533,0.014568458,0.8920873,0.00002516252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027047273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06542292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027047273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008420921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020105317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061098278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320170156","doi":"10.32920/21950399","title":"Towards a Theatre of Global Empathy: Imagining Otherness in the War on Terror","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Empathy; Dysfunctional family; Fell; War on terror; Media studies; Al qaeda; History; Psychology; Sociology; Spanish Civil War; Political science; Law; Art; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Terrorism; Literature; Social psychology; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.12112556237014284,"score_gpt":0.3242688884840624,"score_spread":0.20314332611391955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320170156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1605787,0.0065374193,0.006843683,0.055499136,0.0024120994,0.00006875981,0.00007614908,0.00011946459,0.76786464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570451,0.0016488822,0.0010423929,0.003859982,0.00022343078,0.00003113352,0.000029360363,0.00014071177,0.0359791],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963199,0.0026088024,0.000022267095,0.00016121604,0.00027408215,0.0006137641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983302,0.000903865,0.00010003924,0.00009366581,0.00014423135,0.00042802372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031930872,0.0011622653,0.00032880175,0.0011357794,0.020519333,0.011734737,0.00090891833,0.0032168617,0.0068239714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003358822,0.00029495233,0.00046761657,0.00064568344,0.04532675,0.007061635,0.006549108,0.007047727,0.0009487614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048250236,0.000016961607,0.00037433,0.00006926558,0.000008478843,0.00053421105,0.81824774,0.00015498407,0.00073114503,0.15623933,0.018324818,0.005250529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012121825,0.000025623489,0.0006420141,0.00018011131,0.000007694043,0.00038098326,0.7310273,0.00013660864,0.00040352656,0.018224854,0.24893723,0.000021822763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06634496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099748045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06634496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00912948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038356415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1319176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320170160","doi":"10.32920/21950399.v1","title":"Towards a Theatre of Global Empathy: Imagining Otherness in the War on Terror","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Empathy; Dysfunctional family; Fell; War on terror; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; History; Political science; Spanish Civil War; Psychoanalysis; Art; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Social psychology; Literature; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.12112556237014284,"score_gpt":0.3242688884840624,"score_spread":0.20314332611391955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320170160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1605787,0.0065374193,0.006843683,0.055499136,0.0024120994,0.00006875981,0.00007614908,0.00011946459,0.76786464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570451,0.0016488822,0.0010423929,0.003859982,0.00022343078,0.00003113352,0.000029360363,0.00014071177,0.0359791],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963199,0.0026088024,0.000022267095,0.00016121604,0.00027408215,0.0006137641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983302,0.000903865,0.00010003924,0.00009366581,0.00014423135,0.00042802372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031930872,0.0011622653,0.00032880175,0.0011357794,0.020519333,0.011734737,0.00090891833,0.0032168617,0.0068239714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003358822,0.00029495233,0.00046761657,0.00064568344,0.04532675,0.007061635,0.006549108,0.007047727,0.0009487614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048250236,0.000016961607,0.00037433,0.00006926558,0.000008478843,0.00053421105,0.81824774,0.00015498407,0.00073114503,0.15623933,0.018324818,0.005250529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012121825,0.000025623489,0.0006420141,0.00018011131,0.000007694043,0.00038098326,0.7310273,0.00013660864,0.00040352656,0.018224854,0.24893723,0.000021822763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06634496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099748045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06634496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00912948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038356415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1319176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321504144","doi":"10.3138/ctr.193.001","title":"Introduction: Casting Calls/Calls for Change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casting; History; Visual arts; Media studies; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.1738464525797966,"score_gpt":0.3030275970914081,"score_spread":0.12918114451161147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321504144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077612563,0.1801435,0.0021641268,0.23138724,0.031210162,0.00024156432,0.0017835089,0.0003138636,0.5449947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28789732,0.20043479,0.004273427,0.14377937,0.012987307,0.00047611506,0.0022835562,0.00076119695,0.347107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933207,0.0019468841,0.00030760147,0.0006106125,0.0028229658,0.000991224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888787,0.004815929,0.0007666904,0.0008152384,0.0038798011,0.0008435895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007001428,0.0005410673,0.0004254078,0.0023884894,0.006434547,0.0102420645,0.001977184,0.0036861117,0.033681206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018815665,0.00035310484,0.0004973538,0.003482665,0.009469481,0.005792061,0.003171686,0.005013147,0.0065407613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025651243,0.0000106135185,0.00030934828,0.0016316146,0.0000067911874,0.00014419285,0.018434301,0.000048799284,0.00022910918,0.26221734,0.6445489,0.072393365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019312615,0.0000030513447,0.0005247576,0.0012874986,0.0000042674333,0.000059101592,0.005324879,0.000007388597,0.00006311602,0.0019929665,0.9907251,0.000006015526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23407619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28259614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23407619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021064315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030100346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46542746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323287787","doi":"10.1353/rht.2022.0024","title":"Robert Burton’s Rhetoric: An Anatomy of Early Modern Knowledge by Susan Wells","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scholarship; Rhetorical question; Discipline; Enlightenment; Humanism; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.030033912987981325,"score_gpt":0.2799175967827149,"score_spread":0.24988368379473355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323287787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002082496,0.5902722,0.0057661994,0.14314465,0.010711988,0.000050081977,0.00007814705,0.00007615092,0.2478181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.123760134,0.38077125,0.008341929,0.033452492,0.009392302,0.00021024919,0.00013623902,0.0004003554,0.44353512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811375,0.00085196114,0.00007631848,0.00023813198,0.0006059962,0.00011394086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983891,0.00093507784,0.00011921946,0.000054689044,0.00035321285,0.0001486455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017557616,0.00082743703,0.00044597196,0.002742427,0.002974471,0.005340983,0.00073512923,0.0027717906,0.01196988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004462883,0.00038220483,0.00025650876,0.0024720235,0.009659651,0.008954167,0.0026102555,0.004118532,0.0044484744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023533012,0.000016006865,0.00012015676,0.0004927939,0.0000054400552,0.00016017011,0.017108545,0.00013437348,0.0004779772,0.48301765,0.4140063,0.084437005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015162753,0.0000040830573,0.00008375073,0.0005075862,0.0000011794966,0.00011768303,0.0015610115,0.00001803317,0.0000463148,0.021052927,0.9766005,0.000005522196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073349373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008735197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01196988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045758965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004114956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040043294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323661172","doi":"10.33137/ic.v14i.40396","title":"Displacing the Dominant Discourse(s): Ethnopoetics as Subversion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subversion; Linguistics; Literature; Sociology; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04526922660313001,"score_gpt":0.2812020158501528,"score_spread":0.2359327892470228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323661172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24178842,0.0039355285,0.02104926,0.008658014,0.0005504927,0.000106623425,0.000070927075,0.00026198648,0.7235788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860146,0.00050694164,0.001782256,0.00050852064,0.00010394176,0.00004852812,0.000020886378,0.00012598622,0.010888346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916443,0.005366727,0.00024166974,0.0008600485,0.0010267363,0.0008605679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937901,0.0035863204,0.0003856132,0.0012723494,0.00049541064,0.0004701883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050686453,0.0008199481,0.0005894835,0.0034543916,0.011361339,0.016827496,0.0014728367,0.002006563,0.0030839252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077871312,0.00040778492,0.00044231565,0.0029147868,0.077765055,0.010290078,0.010354139,0.003821558,0.00041607267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025691688,0.00001057312,0.00052425865,0.00005362442,0.0000048934407,0.00022555569,0.44297042,0.000053361844,0.0004600873,0.5464293,0.00072252366,0.0085196635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000433386,0.00007424277,0.0021969683,0.00041480176,0.000031363747,0.001196757,0.4233019,0.00080138235,0.0012283949,0.35193202,0.21873249,0.00004629311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02483332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01922256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02483332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008809186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005214728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06391537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005064","doi":"10.1353/rht.2000.0015","title":"The Changing Tradition: Women in the History of Rhetoric ed. by Christine Mason Sutherland and Rebecca Sutcliffe","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scholarship; Power (physics); Politics; CLARITY; Sociology; Political rhetoric; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Gender studies; History; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02315727814842709,"score_gpt":0.20843087662265836,"score_spread":0.18527359847423128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005064","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050646364,0.94123584,0.00012203539,0.032989938,0.004747552,0.000006068598,0.000015965268,0.000013469874,0.020362718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021488551,0.9046389,0.00044592982,0.011284091,0.010855732,0.000051040435,0.00004472716,0.00007335216,0.051117674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997678,0.0010693292,0.00009232292,0.00023632392,0.00067877286,0.00024538834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683964,0.0021283366,0.0002290898,0.00011397832,0.0003984313,0.00029045407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022920673,0.0011498826,0.0011697214,0.0040806625,0.004986922,0.009616394,0.0014419876,0.0042392476,0.010780316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039344784,0.000757503,0.0005444662,0.005785409,0.01026302,0.008554015,0.0032395136,0.0049844803,0.0035939116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042941378,0.00006445723,0.0004015645,0.002622298,0.000020474006,0.0002448137,0.026375724,0.000112104295,0.00032131348,0.08485302,0.66200995,0.22293139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033041804,0.000013324904,0.00053470785,0.003213191,0.0000059111203,0.00011643251,0.0041857823,0.000016367809,0.000048064147,0.0062608994,0.98559386,0.0000081562175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013111939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024725955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013111939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075557926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068909954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05482143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005384","doi":"10.1353/rht.2013.0005","title":"A New History of the Sermon: The Nineteenth Century ed. by Robert H. Ellison","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sermon; Rhetorical question; History; Surprise; Subject (documents); Literature; Classics; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.016879393460475716,"score_gpt":0.18822836079870822,"score_spread":0.17134896733823252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005384","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003171339,0.95280117,0.00016058174,0.012895405,0.007982542,0.000004172795,0.000020437185,0.000019531524,0.025799029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024937661,0.8544142,0.00045777715,0.010216163,0.020705093,0.000024067103,0.00006737329,0.00008733131,0.089090385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998587,0.0005803051,0.00008400696,0.00018190934,0.00041198998,0.00015480493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872106,0.0005784774,0.00012833494,0.000066951776,0.00032299513,0.00018210562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014902232,0.001089237,0.0007489599,0.003969179,0.0027264669,0.00784297,0.0007712811,0.0031069398,0.01550677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025422669,0.00059205777,0.0004488082,0.003275186,0.0043630223,0.005738558,0.002198509,0.0044608223,0.006484431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059597765,0.000047788555,0.00033972182,0.0018097577,0.000016442536,0.00032721087,0.009265614,0.00009389521,0.00023843462,0.084527135,0.67761767,0.22565675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017606737,0.000005643884,0.00021260478,0.0012304098,0.0000024022722,0.00009559453,0.0006798585,0.0000067276314,0.00002108136,0.0029594155,0.99478096,0.0000034317432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00595013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008745698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01550677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004114626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039029932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051875353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324005429","doi":"10.1353/rht.2003.0004","title":"Episodes in the Rhetoric of Government-Indian Relations by Janice Schuetz","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Appeal; Scope (computer science); History; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Social science; Law; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02423556957828069,"score_gpt":0.2269617000477655,"score_spread":0.20272613046948482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324005429","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003793513,0.6849724,0.0005541285,0.09523448,0.014191027,0.000051173636,0.00016333327,0.000103022336,0.20093682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08860357,0.67229116,0.001215585,0.028369674,0.018506836,0.00013576237,0.00045529657,0.00032473414,0.19009733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.00031481357,0.000033083656,0.0000804662,0.0002634674,0.00010124419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881554,0.00072812324,0.000093459756,0.000035109,0.00022304857,0.0001048118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068524806,0.00064070465,0.0003812421,0.0021434268,0.0036899315,0.0068029067,0.0007756031,0.0014514759,0.005726838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023519068,0.0004528271,0.0002201246,0.0038792286,0.0033559133,0.0052227736,0.0017657182,0.0044647097,0.0028097243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020437363,0.000028321967,0.0002826672,0.00045394214,0.0000066619305,0.00012867889,0.013216191,0.00018321707,0.00011430136,0.092490345,0.8481813,0.044893917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016895235,0.0000046984055,0.0005434556,0.00075779407,0.0000037283853,0.00008540975,0.003207974,0.000030326955,0.00004365745,0.0049163443,0.9903984,0.000006572941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022795958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030640528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022795958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003823472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039150896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04532653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324006202","doi":"10.1353/rht.2014.0025","title":"Between Worlds: The Rhetorical Universe of Paradise Lost by William Pallister, and: Milton and the Art of Rhetoric by Daniel Shore","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Literature; Paradise; Philosophy; Erasmus+; History; Art; Art history; Theology; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.025515320401331216,"score_gpt":0.2318754741764288,"score_spread":0.20636015377509756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324006202","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006184226,0.5173002,0.0025982873,0.27091488,0.010910405,0.000049830025,0.00008445227,0.00007473884,0.19188295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23769003,0.23228662,0.0036360198,0.061429746,0.024159126,0.00022219888,0.0001298949,0.0003236161,0.44012278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988827,0.0005896058,0.00003621755,0.00014859876,0.00025275574,0.000090056325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872154,0.0007875805,0.00011500914,0.000059463502,0.000160222,0.00015615413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019120796,0.0008150801,0.0003940875,0.0017430203,0.004049498,0.0059895893,0.0009711925,0.0030230195,0.0063683446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042874427,0.00044587546,0.0002945682,0.0018186442,0.011796901,0.011550602,0.0034092127,0.0065118815,0.0023622336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000411967,0.000029587023,0.00020352102,0.00026212612,0.0000071930144,0.00020756145,0.025182571,0.00013325257,0.00019880362,0.29278633,0.6439442,0.037003763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046793825,0.000012910853,0.0002939926,0.0005026629,0.0000029956134,0.00019447113,0.005796475,0.000082245686,0.000080252175,0.04057647,0.95243865,0.000014330413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069547566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010921946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069547566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00505244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025313748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03665811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360978040","doi":"10.1353/aiq.2022.0024","title":"Native American Rhetoric ed. by Lawrence W. Gross","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Indian Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Scholarship; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Literature; Philosophy; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.015870651047999593,"score_gpt":0.24615913292109035,"score_spread":0.23028848187309076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360978040","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005661968,0.70241624,0.00073358807,0.051055588,0.029423742,0.000043913922,0.00031980328,0.00019782735,0.21524318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012288818,0.38480932,0.0014747711,0.0130202435,0.011268573,0.00011673883,0.00040981083,0.00025632422,0.5763554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935836,0.00016408983,0.000036013418,0.00011961607,0.0002584683,0.000063451014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993987,0.0001558995,0.00006276925,0.000022920583,0.00027163178,0.000088016706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010535156,0.0015344189,0.00076093414,0.0023108325,0.002917712,0.005259597,0.00074167654,0.0020769602,0.058404893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002200229,0.0005311144,0.00040799918,0.0031202412,0.0014899472,0.005274995,0.0017790003,0.0032383248,0.050601836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006741759,0.000009878474,0.000060458766,0.00018419698,0.000001894868,0.000027046468,0.0006920011,0.0000319456,0.000067946516,0.0064871884,0.9403863,0.052044477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.1506076e-7,0.000001739625,0.00013351938,0.0003171737,0.0000010442155,0.000030962387,0.0002447364,0.000009090398,0.00001296787,0.0009189579,0.9983266,0.000002473022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016020412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027982647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058404893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030717494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037336599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19538385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361000806","doi":"10.29173/scancan227","title":"“The Long Road of Reconciliation”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian-Canadian Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Complicity; Rhetorical question; Colonialism; Indigenous; Sociology; Foley; Narrative; Commission; Prime minister; History; Aesthetics; Media studies; Law; Political science; Art; Literature; Politics","score_opus":0.12191612510652453,"score_gpt":0.3082482009898302,"score_spread":0.18633207588330566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361000806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02708576,0.008345066,0.042750727,0.16189219,0.0026056021,0.00010899967,0.000056425353,0.00030525494,0.75685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932215,0.0016849412,0.007288091,0.008165382,0.0012003883,0.00010027066,0.00004155071,0.00035261663,0.048951868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754149,0.016350903,0.00038810418,0.00225005,0.0037593879,0.0018366781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98812264,0.0062017906,0.00085281907,0.0024875237,0.0016023102,0.00073285826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019837921,0.0008218505,0.0006496456,0.0030135422,0.023563875,0.015729312,0.0033328957,0.005410173,0.008150734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027500547,0.00038370673,0.00043759486,0.0021652426,0.12734938,0.022028843,0.013096959,0.0089096995,0.0015437434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049173404,0.000004427614,0.00007306445,0.00003945292,0.000002944764,0.00006174121,0.048879903,0.00004054961,0.000045522684,0.93819314,0.0058862073,0.0067681023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008583094,0.00001888678,0.00029952446,0.00038659325,0.000008695565,0.00018658688,0.06015622,0.00021974723,0.00037164433,0.48202422,0.45629668,0.000022664783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016812976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017410716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.983187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013375024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015093787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10491419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361283546","doi":"10.1089/env.2022.0081","title":"What Does Chelsea Creek Do for You? A Relational Approach to Environmental Justice Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Joyce Foundation; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Environmental justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05739044440163858,"score_gpt":0.25340559221021,"score_spread":0.19601514780857138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361283546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19084495,0.0056723584,0.025140932,0.25658512,0.0007508701,0.00007602103,0.00015299425,0.00019224572,0.5205845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776114,0.00096042803,0.0022040054,0.0054641636,0.00012495492,0.000039346873,0.000025336456,0.000044481287,0.01352585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952193,0.0032697131,0.00010586446,0.00041671112,0.00048578723,0.0005026052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408805,0.0037080094,0.0007088599,0.00034084008,0.0005661253,0.0005880728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050097895,0.00035840727,0.0002354611,0.0024155108,0.019464076,0.010955138,0.0016079786,0.0032782448,0.008143706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010083031,0.00020921597,0.00021254217,0.0023007374,0.026552536,0.012008154,0.008068244,0.0038992062,0.00059984025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015025743,0.000014922882,0.0031674867,0.00008605742,0.000008098309,0.0004078866,0.44201112,0.00012958358,0.0004026545,0.52583486,0.013868443,0.014053916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000831308,0.00003948633,0.0056181354,0.00047797314,0.000024115101,0.00027933382,0.5003361,0.0004564472,0.0005753099,0.072611965,0.41953358,0.00003932789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05675656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11440872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05675656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012584392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054175085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112852395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362509944","doi":"10.1353/nai.2023.0003","title":"Rhetoric and Settler Inertia: Strategies of Canadian Decolonization by Patrick Belanger, and: Arts of Engagement: Taking Aesthetic Action in and Beyond Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission by Dylan Robinson and Keavy Martin, and: Research &amp; Reconciliation: Unsettling Ways of Knowing through Indigenous Relationships by Shawn Wilson, Andrea V. Breen and Lindsay Dupré","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Native American and Indigenous Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Indigenous; The arts; Decolonization; Sociology; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Media studies; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.20373143023479903,"score_gpt":0.34156260824977464,"score_spread":0.1378311780149756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362509944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042359024,0.044458013,0.0038868252,0.48671725,0.0061842543,0.00017616796,0.0001982433,0.00018309538,0.41583714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7152338,0.026354846,0.0037857029,0.045359418,0.001015676,0.00015968696,0.00014703814,0.00044844594,0.20749542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904975,0.0021050298,0.00018549841,0.00065592024,0.0042459206,0.0023100968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941106,0.003278004,0.0006199132,0.00036584734,0.0046983664,0.0016267451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007875145,0.00083583186,0.00075641123,0.0035015198,0.06017534,0.018834716,0.0030627863,0.0047385227,0.016463226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014085218,0.00047881843,0.0005594517,0.005074793,0.05573017,0.0074607707,0.011920114,0.009221186,0.0010696668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004391936,0.000025619769,0.0011825202,0.00035906755,0.00001646202,0.0004110102,0.3144033,0.00032923836,0.0004796749,0.3386025,0.2835599,0.060586724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008201878,0.000013514643,0.0012814471,0.00064902875,0.000017481127,0.00010068236,0.16008331,0.00014502574,0.00026052207,0.015129811,0.8222372,0.00007374197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97340447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93982464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13914324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19361831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367159047","doi":"10.7202/1079374ar","title":"Penny Van Esterik, Beyond the Breast-Bottle Controversy, New Brunswick, New Yersey: Rutgers University Press, 1989. 242 pages, U.S. $13.00 (paper), $30.00 (cloth)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bottle; Art history; Penny; Media studies; Art; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02791689485412327,"score_gpt":0.21445563568336629,"score_spread":0.18653874082924302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367159047","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005040434,0.85118616,0.00057379185,0.0598479,0.002693671,0.000018467497,0.0005363309,0.00008713413,0.084552534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016558163,0.7390981,0.0013154576,0.0120482305,0.0021027047,0.00007096605,0.0006205204,0.00025298548,0.22793296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930036,0.00015427667,0.00006419708,0.00008357384,0.0002915751,0.000105901236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866676,0.00060372794,0.00016399064,0.00006005521,0.0003733259,0.00013220622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014458562,0.0012301338,0.0007765468,0.0030023498,0.0033537643,0.0051336875,0.0021798469,0.0034253155,0.05945264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031327384,0.0012082269,0.00037360468,0.0076013003,0.0034223252,0.011077148,0.001215172,0.004102455,0.023805397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002347757,0.000012903413,0.00020263797,0.00036349133,0.000007149153,0.00008997487,0.0013450738,0.000056919933,0.00011524545,0.020831412,0.9407147,0.036237042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085011625,0.0000036124425,0.0020889947,0.0006128696,0.000009075342,0.00009529476,0.0018441591,0.000029228002,0.00010478176,0.010782891,0.98440415,0.000016468353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21419404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5019823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21419404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008131759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074400473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42589462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376109036","doi":"10.1080/10572252.2023.2210198","title":"Infrastructural Storytelling: A Methodological Approach for Narrating Environmental (In)justice in Technical and Professional Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technical Communication Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Digital storytelling; Sustainability; Narrative; Politics; Environmental justice; Sociology; Technical communication; Environmental communication; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13203191766541023,"score_gpt":0.3380915344555188,"score_spread":0.2060596167901086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376109036","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093444504,0.0056879227,0.55888355,0.023091609,0.0011182232,0.0010581694,0.0007825367,0.00040579526,0.3155278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369056,0.0022484183,0.13961978,0.0017440243,0.00036762678,0.0020774836,0.00035248042,0.00031029637,0.016374288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98539203,0.012937023,0.00027262993,0.00048189508,0.0005824637,0.0003339469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97130865,0.024542954,0.0012113466,0.0014619965,0.0009466732,0.0005283058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013819825,0.0012264753,0.0005246821,0.0061585843,0.008053077,0.0134768635,0.0027068031,0.002896625,0.00810129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023643129,0.0004894669,0.0005564709,0.0043798927,0.026332349,0.015279449,0.009133173,0.003371802,0.0008520806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035662662,0.000028338061,0.00065497315,0.00034823103,0.000013168196,0.0003045046,0.43680254,0.0004485131,0.00076941785,0.53896755,0.0038643405,0.01776283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035368474,0.000072961324,0.00088956323,0.0011971935,0.00003593682,0.000652811,0.3549505,0.0026693018,0.0021998978,0.363833,0.27340236,0.00006107325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027490244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043067248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013819825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039867153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030307467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073087096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376270289","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.2022-0038","title":"The Aweful Music of Kurt Cobain: Nirvana and the <i>Mysterium Tremendum</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03750935024616683,"score_gpt":0.2471814781845324,"score_spread":0.20967212793836557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376270289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70550984,0.017614253,0.0021068226,0.0324206,0.0024193246,0.000042403855,0.000048563204,0.00007296063,0.23976521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97528785,0.0027201418,0.000382819,0.0020019382,0.00026095076,0.000024559062,0.000014816115,0.00006647295,0.019240558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990576,0.0005329132,0.00001197762,0.0000792048,0.00013208881,0.00018621076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993345,0.0003148928,0.00008574441,0.000041095835,0.00006812346,0.00015552137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759738,0.00041006538,0.00030902965,0.0007173294,0.01337269,0.0072635375,0.00065999915,0.0014322605,0.0025119772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00217822,0.00020841538,0.00015423361,0.00058530364,0.013809151,0.003507671,0.0038036632,0.0034638944,0.0005474021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015852021,0.000069352616,0.0033498139,0.00021474207,0.000014203217,0.0016108297,0.8268867,0.00009579436,0.0024870448,0.11980193,0.021784525,0.02352651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014432698,0.000073739866,0.0064833746,0.00039032206,0.000013342694,0.0017331053,0.4358053,0.00011671933,0.000862504,0.0065544327,0.5479005,0.00005223084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008795964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023080448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01337269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033534567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015644118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024331152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376460807","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-29937-7_11","title":"Transforming Data on the Boundaries of Science and Policy: The Council of Canadian Academies’ Rhetorical Repertoire","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in big data","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Repertoire; Rhetorical question; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Science policy; Boundary-work; Boundary (topology); Public relations; Sociology; Social science; Linguistics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.6621043897038935,"score_gpt":0.37215805610448716,"score_spread":0.28994633359940636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376460807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003387574,0.012704335,0.002642468,0.81617385,0.0030000794,0.000055285884,0.00029977228,0.00006568129,0.16167097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5479443,0.018091846,0.01451799,0.30334678,0.0036237666,0.0005559018,0.00045260097,0.0007940463,0.110672794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89718825,0.037519988,0.0033514968,0.006091184,0.044425055,0.011424081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72331345,0.20815304,0.0031166717,0.008398583,0.044599924,0.012418328],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1227249,0.0011004107,0.002487301,0.010823726,0.068483606,0.058206137,0.006889736,0.023150079,0.007212126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15942568,0.0018788592,0.0010578729,0.02026674,0.111028954,0.022857442,0.019169932,0.039719407,0.0007471278],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129606005,0.000008366653,0.00019813803,0.00009705029,0.000012761516,0.00005578351,0.027332217,0.00012103771,0.00006148652,0.8401119,0.12041341,0.011574916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000216469,0.00000556791,0.0010390849,0.0008193267,0.000022856246,0.000029563744,0.02055332,0.00030155707,0.00016065245,0.18961522,0.78733355,0.00009767817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95370156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96434546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94179386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22688681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47669002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8967017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377240570","doi":"10.1515/9780773557826-008","title":"Hard Facts and Soft Power: Rhetoric, Reality, and Influence in Montreal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soft power; Rhetoric; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics; Politics; Law; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.031245572416128287,"score_gpt":0.21285848156675438,"score_spread":0.18161290915062608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377240570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035131916,0.0138482135,0.0022104187,0.044108633,0.00046349596,0.000072888535,0.0003015228,0.00010572188,0.90375715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7411989,0.006201118,0.0012880177,0.001889009,0.00021801483,0.00006490698,0.00009072665,0.00014653597,0.24890289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754226,0.0008120163,0.000066661356,0.00033490438,0.0007765921,0.000467467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967685,0.0019093724,0.00021917434,0.00012958322,0.00051293016,0.00046036768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002637479,0.0006018681,0.0003692424,0.002745992,0.015945408,0.016001359,0.0016362212,0.0021389287,0.02254758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092183715,0.00054818316,0.000195557,0.0051386678,0.022773903,0.0053358204,0.0043894597,0.003508328,0.000882328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025924806,0.000017351262,0.0010442164,0.00009140497,0.000008667547,0.00021939083,0.058464818,0.0003144234,0.0002543891,0.86634797,0.03570902,0.037502553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019321662,0.000022661141,0.008051645,0.0003791755,0.00003092452,0.0000608773,0.03431783,0.00056435214,0.0005572328,0.08108023,0.8748427,0.00007303075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9372089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9633968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08789787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08789787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058259185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63774663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378187924","doi":"10.29173/spectrum184","title":"The Goodness of Gilmore: Examining the Moralization of Reading in the Rory Gilmore-inspired Readathons of BookTube","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Drama; Virtue; Scholarship; Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Art","score_opus":0.09292438235765814,"score_gpt":0.27950441276012733,"score_spread":0.18658003040246918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378187924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88609153,0.0004414312,0.0010209453,0.008370708,0.00012308145,0.00002267746,0.000042444637,0.000040909017,0.10384639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866153,0.00018243208,0.00025998979,0.0006813645,0.000041242925,0.000012461966,0.000022600467,0.000046815097,0.012137704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987097,0.0008663444,0.000013951387,0.000106091175,0.00016492055,0.00013912386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964914,0.0023900808,0.00045318945,0.00015931022,0.00018032787,0.00032576613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012755328,0.00021436611,0.0002667552,0.00067850045,0.006158252,0.0042089415,0.00055491,0.0014117715,0.0044789854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057755597,0.00018692116,0.0001140208,0.00039169606,0.00941455,0.0030860913,0.0030541515,0.0032080426,0.00048133096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048438742,0.00006109411,0.004498897,0.00008621603,0.0000062905633,0.0010369201,0.936302,0.000070815564,0.0020429816,0.04030544,0.0058187502,0.009722123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009872414,0.00012580045,0.016486902,0.00023772764,0.000014332177,0.00094326574,0.77653015,0.00033021288,0.0027993885,0.006230942,0.19624278,0.000048741225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008011805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029789532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008011805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025662077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009444768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01861918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379780098","doi":"10.1353/aiq.2016.a615233","title":"Sarah Winnemucca Goes to Washington: Rhetoric and Resistance in the Capital City","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Indian Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Politics; Resistance (ecology); Power (physics); Depiction; Brother; Law; History; Rhetoric; Sociology; Economic history; Political science; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.021108742493331643,"score_gpt":0.2402008633857989,"score_spread":0.21909212089246727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379780098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11094309,0.022361401,0.00063309714,0.27533233,0.005904034,0.000049561342,0.000049636263,0.000075513446,0.58465135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8304959,0.0057172514,0.000319274,0.033226185,0.0010689553,0.00005933684,0.000033466826,0.00010655532,0.12897313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980171,0.0009321109,0.00003574702,0.00020163995,0.00027766294,0.00053574814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983126,0.00077692134,0.00016811269,0.00008932206,0.00021119443,0.00044173177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025492497,0.0006422728,0.00027887625,0.0014994942,0.03047544,0.013567025,0.0011385222,0.004335102,0.010413684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029494364,0.0003090597,0.00020623814,0.001352302,0.020719135,0.0061219484,0.006554533,0.0061915372,0.0010082576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004693035,0.00008130535,0.0014899131,0.00013558511,0.000014820973,0.0008372677,0.27655452,0.000079053294,0.0003796502,0.31182683,0.37427565,0.034278493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010705476,0.000018371264,0.0013668585,0.00047917568,0.000009094713,0.00009998982,0.1370288,0.00007103294,0.00023636292,0.009191105,0.8514627,0.000025789655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112268485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21598671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112268485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020350793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080301175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W437999362","doi":"","title":"The informal use of Reductio ad Absurdum","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reductio ad absurdum; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06375881558454939,"score_gpt":0.22135274505102984,"score_spread":0.15759392946648043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W437999362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02669164,0.012388575,0.41952127,0.023411283,0.0019925595,0.00014756787,0.00012636925,0.0006466115,0.5150741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8987996,0.003440033,0.06502058,0.002792797,0.00143677,0.0003052322,0.00012595308,0.00025238964,0.027826587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97830725,0.0139237745,0.0010454529,0.001784044,0.0039451937,0.0009942648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98562884,0.009102349,0.0010672376,0.0023857267,0.001476036,0.000339901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011672722,0.0011575972,0.00094144914,0.002645237,0.004898967,0.009711549,0.0021261263,0.0028600297,0.004688967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01894183,0.00071806775,0.001376882,0.0014050986,0.030209439,0.015472188,0.007080071,0.00645854,0.0015006942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004318109,0.0000043835043,0.000046914687,0.000021058124,0.0000031996103,0.000028186085,0.0012405758,0.00013879924,0.000060866623,0.99521893,0.0005519362,0.002680758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066295306,0.000011952894,0.00006845545,0.00006789552,0.000006648931,0.00008238802,0.00035554645,0.0008904519,0.00015594279,0.9632753,0.035066914,0.000011856143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002480308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001399489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011672722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051865675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001969204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061731994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380048046","doi":"10.5817/ty2023-1-6","title":"Theatre and pedagogy : adapting Euripides' Trojan Women and the political science classroom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatralia","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trojan; Politics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.05592850744321265,"score_gpt":0.30570225805764906,"score_spread":0.2497737506144364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380048046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3748988,0.0021336211,0.0026903856,0.013164105,0.0009099959,0.000071817056,0.000019231276,0.000043895066,0.60606813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916804,0.00059130485,0.0009819141,0.0014070293,0.00009270148,0.000040076306,0.000010557123,0.000085176835,0.079987325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692684,0.0018156769,0.0000561081,0.00024616352,0.00029421962,0.0006609835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989687,0.00061228685,0.00006636566,0.00006970825,0.00007772551,0.00020519976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004695051,0.0005033327,0.00034747945,0.0010026112,0.012908692,0.010121914,0.0010647658,0.0024333585,0.008836168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041726413,0.0002987344,0.00026178817,0.0007306684,0.013556874,0.0042241276,0.009543958,0.005224359,0.0008337283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001107236,0.00014764293,0.0010726835,0.00011772694,0.0000067870683,0.00065861247,0.5479053,0.00020506541,0.0014860742,0.40792674,0.0050546643,0.035308015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045731085,0.0001569441,0.003410574,0.00048617876,0.000016410866,0.0003703697,0.38477573,0.00034260246,0.0018122988,0.028830467,0.57972443,0.000028240413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046896194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012370285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012908692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053769248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050072875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03901249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380675090","doi":"10.1080/27671127.2023.2222794","title":"Reactive Memories of 1776","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication and Democracy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Mythology; White supremacy; Politics; State (computer science); Scholarship; Prerogative; Collective memory; Rhetorical question; Status quo; Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Art; Theology; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059757282617502225,"score_gpt":0.2776086415536838,"score_spread":0.21785135893618157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380675090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21076952,0.007128285,0.029264921,0.03456032,0.0024862618,0.000073901785,0.00011317917,0.00029074593,0.71531284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98048854,0.0005820775,0.0013685712,0.0019778146,0.00030339588,0.0000290286,0.000033817716,0.0001223988,0.015094315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956382,0.002927423,0.00013506137,0.00041814955,0.00058563735,0.00029553956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413824,0.0040478157,0.0005392801,0.00055204745,0.00048284847,0.00023992258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058888965,0.000728361,0.00032988217,0.0019597765,0.008327356,0.0066789268,0.0010177362,0.0028189286,0.0059543876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014467488,0.00025965835,0.0003089207,0.0010788784,0.026907628,0.010033775,0.005559294,0.0047807796,0.0007722449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047672955,0.000010075819,0.00038147552,0.00010887075,0.0000074345458,0.00022074276,0.26951492,0.0001086377,0.00063844625,0.71543765,0.004165001,0.009359204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023305794,0.00010227915,0.0010053716,0.00092547253,0.00003092573,0.00082128175,0.21363983,0.0006851845,0.0034040501,0.17181474,0.60747343,0.00007419319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018523734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019779915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008327356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00292778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001167306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031143844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380881046","doi":"10.3138/ctr.127.016","title":"Urban Research, Collective Report, Audience Encounter: Darren O’Donnell Discusses the Benefits of Talking to Strangers in <i>Diplomatic Immunities</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Visual arts; Art; Ceiling (cloud); Art history; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.06125374989039529,"score_gpt":0.2904173623050762,"score_spread":0.22916361241468092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380881046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075612426,0.03697114,0.0012247772,0.20741186,0.0055623213,0.000209712,0.0009732079,0.00029300892,0.67174155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43024284,0.022561224,0.0005189622,0.014526319,0.0018867537,0.00020293472,0.00037628275,0.00027250047,0.5294122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981768,0.000889235,0.00004198729,0.00014501516,0.00042840716,0.0003186048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970457,0.0012838135,0.0002722569,0.00016775036,0.00062344235,0.0006069964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003173253,0.00056989945,0.0003712488,0.0022047742,0.021599561,0.0048813964,0.0011716762,0.0025038992,0.03118923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050694486,0.00034230927,0.0002435004,0.0034045242,0.0062695756,0.0025889643,0.004884365,0.0025818394,0.00331307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030949686,0.000041212625,0.0019600103,0.0003303618,0.000007724673,0.001104202,0.2628251,0.00007535467,0.00038934374,0.024737647,0.6845018,0.02399635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027264873,0.000013712367,0.0023833236,0.00013579374,0.0000044566636,0.0001753682,0.13114314,0.000017026367,0.00017732069,0.00034120705,0.86559445,0.000011559498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26324484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49621746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26324484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009648449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007396202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52342516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381234871","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.1383","title":"Animal Rhetorics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Aesthetics; Literature; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.18015282891374176,"score_gpt":0.3764431301019335,"score_spread":0.1962903011881917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381234871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013971771,0.017490432,0.016389636,0.046977002,0.004428566,0.00004696446,0.00011730544,0.00017307297,0.9004051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74448323,0.009369935,0.0059620594,0.016763652,0.0046570394,0.00013144861,0.0001962288,0.00032427968,0.21811213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739254,0.0016801768,0.00005511581,0.0002299578,0.00048545114,0.00015669112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968363,0.0021813794,0.00023091398,0.00021971644,0.00039726,0.00013442761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002186264,0.0004988047,0.00034959754,0.0018301299,0.0038874685,0.0057400814,0.0008242685,0.0023357226,0.016021514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049803127,0.00016796365,0.00032147975,0.0009791772,0.010637782,0.0051868847,0.0024252038,0.0034029828,0.0031097194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012484711,0.000010841465,0.00011735803,0.00011016285,0.000004654557,0.00007663671,0.007394013,0.000097775046,0.00022028357,0.95795816,0.022359226,0.01163838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049909036,0.000025084533,0.00022116542,0.000491393,0.000005193709,0.00013529827,0.0031156996,0.00025840048,0.00033496894,0.1342479,0.8611515,0.000008428341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085417106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008999334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016021514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031623214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014248387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05359733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383704334","doi":"10.7202/1099917ar","title":"Solidarités et altérisation : le « nous » et le « elles » dans les écrits de Québécoises deboutte!","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches féministes","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1955911527692392,"score_gpt":0.3528969285118204,"score_spread":0.15730577574258123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383704334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47540045,0.00988881,0.0037881082,0.073933706,0.0006587593,0.0000637334,0.00018940179,0.000037553324,0.4360395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229685,0.0018827349,0.0005898289,0.0024577668,0.000041316373,0.000028125116,0.000034558834,0.00003120514,0.0719659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984554,0.00052434416,0.000023918401,0.00017168905,0.00028226085,0.0005424589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885225,0.00029815605,0.00013560557,0.00008552568,0.00028594796,0.00034257583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016424381,0.00035118073,0.0002905689,0.0008248919,0.019679872,0.005870916,0.00081544643,0.0017665456,0.011212691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019224957,0.00021749029,0.00022593253,0.0013233343,0.029798951,0.0039482787,0.00416832,0.003796134,0.000421514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300582,0.000017089034,0.005942929,0.00008154875,0.0000088758,0.00046734774,0.47795334,0.00014094083,0.0006382481,0.47797617,0.0123322485,0.02440819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086283335,0.00002809738,0.021138014,0.00048249724,0.000016594317,0.00020491118,0.4042521,0.0002411635,0.00047998587,0.022426127,0.5506581,0.00006383494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8635244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9406535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13647562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029815108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02276584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27455866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594691","doi":"10.59962/9780774823128-009","title":"Capture and Control of Biotechnology Discourse in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Biotechnology; Political science; Biology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.013841008179185984,"score_gpt":0.15669230775765036,"score_spread":0.14285129957846437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18551736,0.013977263,0.0013505316,0.057476103,0.00036361808,0.0000794013,0.0006011978,0.000118408956,0.7405161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86562634,0.0044473056,0.0005651362,0.0031387222,0.000079304584,0.00003736906,0.00012402846,0.00010562681,0.12587619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947984,0.00059120863,0.00009272512,0.00046150663,0.002251178,0.0018049658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152386,0.003603435,0.00045175847,0.0002660611,0.0029191694,0.0012357006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027179823,0.00050828804,0.0005529011,0.0051461887,0.03279018,0.021679284,0.0020430204,0.0035981212,0.015527757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111432355,0.0006379235,0.00029036537,0.010949208,0.017779173,0.0036642186,0.0041078827,0.0050240164,0.00087141717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013723868,0.000058708425,0.0048729097,0.00017842372,0.000024323652,0.000533208,0.17640695,0.0006523233,0.0010665294,0.6599168,0.079462975,0.076689586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003543141,0.000022892082,0.017613625,0.0005454439,0.000046996593,0.00013747514,0.10966137,0.0011145767,0.0013788174,0.035748474,0.8335795,0.000115362855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99460393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26955876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31439978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8472083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385622525","doi":"10.4324/9781003350620","title":"Energy Politics and Discourse in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Environmental politics; Energy (signal processing); Sociology; Media studies; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.04230970786907904,"score_gpt":0.23246780133257383,"score_spread":0.1901580934634948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385622525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028179316,0.025026282,0.0003810215,0.06743592,0.0007824203,0.000028302204,0.00025899254,0.00006973948,0.877838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6751813,0.021549035,0.0006223357,0.010984004,0.000298222,0.000057826863,0.00027188842,0.00013796834,0.29089734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965982,0.00033732678,0.00003827657,0.000204576,0.0016148769,0.001206746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983778,0.0005304083,0.00006734905,0.000044781293,0.00069049135,0.00028907254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011848159,0.0005403198,0.00042038524,0.0030392667,0.045188863,0.018750643,0.0017363582,0.0034156574,0.011258003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035690588,0.0003398447,0.0002800155,0.008407093,0.019287033,0.0034349929,0.004289102,0.0038508247,0.00093004794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017019864,0.000013673366,0.00073254044,0.00012193613,0.0000065474146,0.0003454949,0.07813506,0.00034876048,0.00020429047,0.77928764,0.117109686,0.023677407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005584004,0.000003233759,0.0017067518,0.00027312883,0.000008564152,0.000057506404,0.04457671,0.00024000727,0.00014216435,0.019412152,0.93354857,0.00002564417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99283373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2619371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2619371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21747844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85604835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385696453","doi":"10.59962/9780774814874-004","title":"Reputation and Representation: Reaching for Political Inclusion in Toronto","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Reputation; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.042518134024667364,"score_gpt":0.23811894216926063,"score_spread":0.19560080814459327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385696453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0674416,0.007889844,0.00094664394,0.046552293,0.00034923316,0.000034301636,0.00020388073,0.00007748327,0.87650484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71918434,0.0027849774,0.0004432944,0.0008438126,0.000096240416,0.000024865532,0.000061050574,0.00008035852,0.27648094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981134,0.0004989527,0.00005289264,0.00017961531,0.00046345493,0.000691666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978529,0.0007825184,0.00017401949,0.0001284628,0.0003691008,0.0006930045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012676029,0.0003387838,0.0002806318,0.0015970067,0.018351521,0.011068177,0.00086687924,0.0022675747,0.024588633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004865644,0.00035461364,0.0001812293,0.0035365282,0.00841509,0.0035256492,0.004228922,0.0031620446,0.0013107506],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006770916,0.000016359183,0.0027262524,0.00008613481,0.000007131091,0.00051145494,0.11177485,0.00027722816,0.00027879933,0.7241682,0.10542499,0.054660797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019990264,0.00002433691,0.017922226,0.0003014443,0.00002658934,0.00014362812,0.077499524,0.0005911549,0.00075538195,0.046134163,0.8565271,0.00005441291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88875645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111243546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07124921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04278727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5169516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385815847","doi":"10.1080/08989575.2023.2221953","title":"Black Women Making Place in Nineteenth- Century Newspapers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"a/b Auto/Biography Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Reading (process); Politics; Sociology; Focus (optics); Close reading; Media studies; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06997548808324015,"score_gpt":0.29466932425698567,"score_spread":0.2246938361737455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385815847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76013666,0.0052263676,0.00081365195,0.03403669,0.0016265654,0.00003638212,0.00011704086,0.00004782486,0.19795881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96396625,0.0014420444,0.00017480708,0.002092573,0.00047734412,0.000017606564,0.000025571975,0.000055304463,0.031748492],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747354,0.0016417247,0.00005157732,0.00015137806,0.00035244483,0.00032928158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418384,0.004200211,0.0006344476,0.00011552039,0.00042267755,0.00044334793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030219462,0.0003569419,0.0002739253,0.002213613,0.015011167,0.0065795504,0.000474035,0.0018812466,0.006453827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007197978,0.0003250904,0.00010142014,0.0019291488,0.0079785315,0.0035267868,0.003207201,0.0024195414,0.00075148646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006474781,0.000027066166,0.0015070002,0.00011185315,0.0000049810196,0.0009151102,0.936382,0.000018652774,0.0011271619,0.039226595,0.007838763,0.012776163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010903401,0.0000445761,0.005057378,0.00039694604,0.000012943665,0.00032665642,0.6464407,0.00006687148,0.0017555703,0.0042498866,0.34161717,0.000020382184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008409625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018062763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015011167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046314807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017267985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033603847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385862110","doi":"10.1515/9780774851473-008","title":"Misrepresenting the Canadian Conversation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.06580096164326435,"score_gpt":0.19677350617448594,"score_spread":0.1309725445312216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385862110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03058264,0.009401315,0.0007753522,0.09909995,0.0017682664,0.000032446256,0.00033905092,0.00011112128,0.85788983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66630995,0.0063005826,0.00095010287,0.014345462,0.0004239667,0.000044650897,0.0001636719,0.00027821603,0.31118336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937257,0.0013575334,0.00009723718,0.0005792147,0.0021157253,0.0021246362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99321777,0.0020599493,0.00016981654,0.00033629415,0.0031312422,0.0010849892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037583744,0.0008068705,0.0006501647,0.004667884,0.04710167,0.020500006,0.0022114231,0.005360367,0.024599325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013278597,0.0005256785,0.00031014415,0.006501349,0.019892178,0.005529941,0.004822089,0.008096388,0.0019841166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000880389,0.00001742561,0.0011094438,0.00011134998,0.000012452619,0.00034571532,0.12365392,0.0002179339,0.0003315123,0.57275176,0.2568429,0.044517584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008980791,0.000006000335,0.0018096364,0.00020153922,0.000016907437,0.00008677631,0.056283444,0.0002071433,0.00031529542,0.014301791,0.92670625,0.000056246226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99217635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17291427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17291427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16934133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9593022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387092162","doi":"10.54590/pop.2023.009","title":"Rhetoric, Research, and Revolution: Analyzing Cultural Rhetorics to Rethink Pedagogical Frameworks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pop! Public Open Participatory","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Affordance; Rhetoric; Sociology; Discipline; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Psychology; Linguistics; Engineering; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.7388633744917573,"score_gpt":0.5094630183555485,"score_spread":0.2294003561362088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387092162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27974162,0.039824992,0.26851645,0.109495044,0.0026664399,0.00033794311,0.00015181431,0.00039479198,0.2988709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94724387,0.0065642726,0.03604926,0.0023813327,0.000527974,0.00020153841,0.00006342105,0.00021099905,0.0067572906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98411775,0.013283839,0.00030175317,0.0005645593,0.0012691881,0.000462887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542725,0.03997605,0.0016572728,0.0021239964,0.0013641627,0.00060602714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025029335,0.0007170331,0.0006373264,0.007946335,0.0064897016,0.014813557,0.0015211406,0.0024436924,0.0029155978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033056505,0.00038773275,0.00047640415,0.004078479,0.04619264,0.023081623,0.007348521,0.0055842265,0.00039036546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017102075,0.00003225723,0.0009091268,0.0002447263,0.000009111561,0.00019912272,0.24214453,0.00027057363,0.00042947632,0.7283785,0.0015632951,0.025802232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020133275,0.0000552457,0.0013115691,0.0014903307,0.000024030418,0.00035073215,0.26124498,0.002038191,0.0016616394,0.54790384,0.18386398,0.00003535664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013687139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024318623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025029335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005039988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005664005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13236934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387338928","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v17i3.4219","title":"Collegial or Contentious? Reflections on an Interdisciplinary Panel Discussion about an Oil Pipeline","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oklahoma; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Panel discussion; Pipeline (software); Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Business; Engineering; Advertising; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.35552733911251017,"score_gpt":0.47767223305226886,"score_spread":0.12214489393975869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387338928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028703008,0.0041139945,0.0008352437,0.8980574,0.01825702,0.000090591166,0.000047154357,0.00003469697,0.049860872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42769504,0.005386026,0.00069276436,0.4875543,0.012601974,0.00035672184,0.000047997706,0.0002648233,0.065400384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724741,0.018100921,0.00045818067,0.0021013995,0.002631828,0.004233726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97776836,0.014162549,0.0008388948,0.00042354607,0.0019419807,0.0048647565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02620477,0.0011203832,0.00078219484,0.0019577406,0.058050748,0.025110627,0.0038443091,0.026428372,0.009078407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032016188,0.0008835016,0.0012002393,0.0022990238,0.024300385,0.02139344,0.020202557,0.042936992,0.0014602866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056219444,0.00011674241,0.000865454,0.00020514631,0.000017532893,0.00198137,0.60540575,0.00009164117,0.0006812269,0.078603365,0.30125368,0.010721846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009919371,0.00003116297,0.00049465615,0.0003028534,0.0000052638698,0.00025546533,0.5087452,0.000051011804,0.00014420404,0.0046073245,0.48531425,0.00003871532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013287297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020558096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058050748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013872662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011303438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13858569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388485871","doi":"10.2307/jj.8306234","title":"Public Opinion and Canadian Identity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Identity (music); Political science; Art; Law; Aesthetics; Politics","score_opus":0.21156472324682352,"score_gpt":0.27514461163077286,"score_spread":0.06357988838394935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388485871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005187988,0.0037478956,0.00024707985,0.014915367,0.00034993063,0.0000150045325,0.000117787495,0.000017877062,0.97540104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2532129,0.0036290232,0.00049752,0.003205821,0.00019742882,0.000029226587,0.00010764998,0.000057302117,0.739063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979893,0.00026186655,0.000024546782,0.00016006819,0.0006754564,0.0008887031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988644,0.0002653443,0.000040295152,0.00006308704,0.000545475,0.00022145285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012477438,0.0005440232,0.00039674234,0.0026210258,0.02630908,0.0128661515,0.001146789,0.0034456963,0.034800824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003950811,0.0003311697,0.00035487334,0.004137955,0.010477477,0.0037687994,0.002359554,0.0041900794,0.002262879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008392155,0.000006673692,0.00020887534,0.000013238911,0.0000014024871,0.00004855763,0.004200592,0.000053579053,0.000019268162,0.9248331,0.061084986,0.009521287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009256653,0.0000060530006,0.0020537372,0.00012995092,0.00000926803,0.00006138289,0.011266126,0.00021582536,0.00011631396,0.09072428,0.89538014,0.000027631864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98140395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98953784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095346645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095346645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08927134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69179153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389130142","doi":"10.32920/24660438","title":"A Dialogue on Public Health Celebrities during COVID-19","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public health; Scholarship; Rhetoric; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Perspective (graphical); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sociology; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Virology; Art; Nursing","score_opus":0.3867102825071771,"score_gpt":0.3505373462236935,"score_spread":0.036172936283483614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389130142","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22233146,0.009610066,0.008611725,0.39046973,0.007286378,0.00012631723,0.00015554015,0.0001429062,0.3612659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630326,0.0011074851,0.0008184323,0.016219487,0.0008855079,0.000069800204,0.000030688272,0.00012399614,0.017712085],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97886056,0.016407514,0.00031932042,0.0010263158,0.0014449728,0.0019412829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762165,0.019391,0.0007970841,0.00061012123,0.0007159066,0.0022693824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021839328,0.00073031127,0.0007055578,0.0017928266,0.039479744,0.018012421,0.0016785446,0.010292812,0.0059860786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024536561,0.00067000656,0.00065378216,0.0017905708,0.048673943,0.016308535,0.019838829,0.018589465,0.0007730953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031305182,0.000015364494,0.00029289024,0.00006474057,0.0000036115036,0.0006453182,0.8103802,0.000050172115,0.00022301452,0.17824554,0.0068574017,0.003190363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016824828,0.00004009178,0.0005748003,0.00052031537,0.000008744886,0.00044950857,0.5817249,0.0001963282,0.00049052265,0.030964069,0.38497344,0.000040448518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011995449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013476414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96052027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012805954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006457778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11549884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389130258","doi":"10.32920/24660438.v1","title":"A Dialogue on Public Health Celebrities during COVID-19","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public health; Rhetoric; Pandemic; Scholarship; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Virology; Art","score_opus":0.3867102825071771,"score_gpt":0.3505373462236935,"score_spread":0.036172936283483614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389130258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22233146,0.009610066,0.008611725,0.39046973,0.007286378,0.00012631723,0.00015554015,0.0001429062,0.3612659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630326,0.0011074851,0.0008184323,0.016219487,0.0008855079,0.000069800204,0.000030688272,0.00012399614,0.017712085],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97886056,0.016407514,0.00031932042,0.0010263158,0.0014449728,0.0019412829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762165,0.019391,0.0007970841,0.00061012123,0.0007159066,0.0022693824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021839328,0.00073031127,0.0007055578,0.0017928266,0.039479744,0.018012421,0.0016785446,0.010292812,0.0059860786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024536561,0.00067000656,0.00065378216,0.0017905708,0.048673943,0.016308535,0.019838829,0.018589465,0.0007730953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031305182,0.000015364494,0.00029289024,0.00006474057,0.0000036115036,0.0006453182,0.8103802,0.000050172115,0.00022301452,0.17824554,0.0068574017,0.003190363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016824828,0.00004009178,0.0005748003,0.00052031537,0.000008744886,0.00044950857,0.5817249,0.0001963282,0.00049052265,0.030964069,0.38497344,0.000040448518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011995449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013476414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96052027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012805954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006457778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11549884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389191983","doi":"10.22215/etd/2023-15652","title":"Ethical Storytelling: How Ethical Guidelines Across Canada are Responding to (or Failing to Respond to) Advancements in Multimedia Tools","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Storytelling; Engineering ethics; Deontological ethics; Ethical dilemma; Media ethics; Ethical issues; Journalism; Ethical code; Virtue ethics; Political science; Virtue; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Engineering; Law; Art","score_opus":0.21623863358759043,"score_gpt":0.4185109719265843,"score_spread":0.20227233833899388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389191983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.861055,0.0017635319,0.0037553797,0.035470016,0.00035687245,0.00024212388,0.00015683973,0.000083324914,0.09711689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99165136,0.0006619796,0.0008311201,0.0016421922,0.000019071902,0.0000377953,0.00003608125,0.000036418896,0.0050839745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699635,0.014616853,0.0010515591,0.0019590203,0.007871229,0.004537949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9077122,0.051835805,0.007984286,0.0023569185,0.01985315,0.010257533],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025590379,0.00044917586,0.00048574418,0.004345356,0.043219436,0.02228951,0.0026022645,0.0026954007,0.0035214517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08020154,0.0006020078,0.00034508423,0.005773334,0.033044603,0.006022862,0.009609026,0.0056607723,0.0002386443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027987038,0.000020662717,0.009669826,0.0000843611,0.000007843624,0.00040311922,0.96095204,0.000071432856,0.00032407916,0.013532829,0.003269273,0.01163641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005434406,0.000011438843,0.008403711,0.00016608243,0.000010750637,0.00009056471,0.94417024,0.00020321985,0.00020877286,0.0018327737,0.044853367,0.00004357248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9436548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9653436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11288816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2164571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81906474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389194223","doi":"10.22215/etd/2023-15768","title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates and a Freedom Convoy: A Transdisciplinary Framework for Analyzing Meaning in Health Risk Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Public health; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Risk communication; Transitive relation; Health communication; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing; Psychotherapist; Geography","score_opus":0.07134646901747894,"score_gpt":0.3632350779773324,"score_spread":0.29188860895985347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389194223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19650815,0.01131651,0.094889164,0.12517823,0.0006980118,0.0004522225,0.00029190528,0.00011277474,0.57055295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97557384,0.0016645964,0.013661201,0.001218944,0.00011033211,0.00021064916,0.000075507225,0.000062272105,0.0074226903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880867,0.009570157,0.00030531053,0.00047047014,0.0011208383,0.00044653268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771613,0.01801214,0.0014905577,0.0010553601,0.0017089866,0.000571699],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018017171,0.00059921166,0.00045690202,0.005008535,0.009880466,0.0135170715,0.0012289224,0.00273689,0.0029861063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019988623,0.00035334227,0.00046839146,0.0036545333,0.051852245,0.013567407,0.00660634,0.0043878783,0.00036513494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017160794,0.000016086151,0.001229172,0.0001006077,0.000005649727,0.0001391987,0.25483453,0.00014631523,0.00023051325,0.73311526,0.0013509169,0.008814649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019734487,0.00003737213,0.004254176,0.0012827396,0.000023383067,0.00022055247,0.41801184,0.00159343,0.00079069164,0.42599195,0.1477317,0.00004248818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029621005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027946943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020191794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016828598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14650244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389540149","doi":"10.34041/ln.v28.895","title":"Tensions and Ambivalences of Pride Politics in Uncertain Times","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"lambda nordica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06984522797276692,"score_gpt":0.28505363797380134,"score_spread":0.2152084100010344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389540149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5900885,0.010037924,0.0012048293,0.13337737,0.0034974953,0.000023486335,0.000088822664,0.000032523818,0.26164907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896913,0.0014687476,0.00008144129,0.0031904478,0.00043140826,0.000013980173,0.000021315918,0.00004382607,0.0050575193],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930137,0.00465585,0.00012797178,0.0004621312,0.0006330295,0.0011072697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941315,0.0031178768,0.0006661656,0.00023447139,0.0003815135,0.0014684849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061307917,0.00027123786,0.00043773232,0.0009381049,0.025792986,0.01998604,0.001020162,0.0033829408,0.0055323336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011092191,0.000413285,0.00026179143,0.0010893798,0.032516763,0.0113962805,0.009286048,0.0086733205,0.00076011993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008293525,0.000029978635,0.0037837466,0.000065268505,0.000015176011,0.0008207568,0.7919333,0.000071856455,0.00017071223,0.17535244,0.02054761,0.007126176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007883438,0.000016829987,0.005425424,0.00023843859,0.000005084778,0.00024033134,0.80006135,0.00011312602,0.00008574943,0.020605396,0.17316408,0.00003632328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008199648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01480165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025792986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007264284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022931504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05270636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390483086","doi":"10.29107/rr2023.4.8","title":"Review/recenzja: Christian Kock and Marcus Lantz (eds.). Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School. Windsor, Ontario: Windsor Studies in Argumentation 2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Rhetorica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Environmental science; Literature","score_opus":0.12508882528108484,"score_gpt":0.3467472310167964,"score_spread":0.22165840573571155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390483086","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005642965,0.9915565,0.00007905475,0.0027209898,0.0026549054,0.000008303094,0.00009148663,0.000013447169,0.0028189116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005208491,0.9929974,0.00009803386,0.0011797426,0.0015663123,0.000019089124,0.00016981077,0.000011593464,0.0034371945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855953,0.00025363723,0.00018873165,0.00021718943,0.00067391613,0.00010705481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967769,0.0012871323,0.00046221237,0.00015407418,0.0010521892,0.0002675158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017914438,0.0022848654,0.0038067847,0.005768404,0.0010076397,0.0052834265,0.002847477,0.0032582018,0.030962378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050627333,0.0013084194,0.0012071121,0.014110005,0.0017962876,0.0056759897,0.0021199065,0.0041831494,0.027882822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007048416,0.000031123767,0.00021038688,0.019407574,0.00013460896,0.000110802466,0.00023483585,0.00023165744,0.0001900426,0.002993302,0.6738249,0.30256027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001304832,0.000009986536,0.00050504436,0.008116659,0.000054612818,0.00012784069,0.00010866743,0.000025637653,0.000037239934,0.0006311053,0.9903555,0.000014660985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022326957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03553397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030962378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050530415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00764875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10357946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390678812","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.26.3.0283","title":"Nietzsche’s Mad Eloquence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Aphorism; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Ethos; Style (visual arts); Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Irrationality; Literature; Confusion; Rhetorical device; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Art; Psychology; Rationality; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.14404434488495552,"score_gpt":0.2855232703451368,"score_spread":0.1414789254601813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390678812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06320347,0.008288428,0.029730115,0.110502064,0.0024932888,0.00005253163,0.000077972996,0.00019161637,0.78546053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631804,0.0010326959,0.0025663762,0.003728275,0.00044983285,0.00003065676,0.000015098159,0.000058021178,0.02893861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99376583,0.0038720735,0.00013757835,0.00056303473,0.0013499625,0.00031158252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400735,0.004513522,0.0002884072,0.00041718662,0.0006458029,0.00012768587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053104893,0.00039106287,0.00031004482,0.0016922799,0.0043147923,0.0062295375,0.00073233305,0.002531238,0.0027382907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012769865,0.00021874016,0.00020688848,0.000537261,0.025103834,0.0067728334,0.0037109496,0.0042779506,0.0006739393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008359631,0.000003150999,0.00006313091,0.000015692765,0.0000016798854,0.00004498512,0.005512952,0.000043539618,0.00010810828,0.9898084,0.002038013,0.0023520265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019604233,0.00002618507,0.00022332641,0.00023517116,0.0000131545685,0.00029041103,0.0058396743,0.0007056111,0.0015220327,0.5678216,0.4232708,0.000032382384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022231839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024684598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062295375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043536965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017741473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031588495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390703523","doi":"10.1017/s0034670523000505","title":"Making Rhetoric Risky for Democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Democracy; Demise; Rhetoric; Politics; Deception; Aesthetics; Style (visual arts); Character (mathematics); Sociology; Literature; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13589941206217027,"score_gpt":0.37290814401421135,"score_spread":0.23700873195204109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390703523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008161607,0.103556335,0.016004689,0.54009384,0.0060710013,0.000023178598,0.00003272262,0.0001363128,0.3259203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6957819,0.074228495,0.007980978,0.11549845,0.01580395,0.00017353542,0.000055341618,0.00037115207,0.09010629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98968947,0.0072036353,0.00018826891,0.0005397041,0.0017925632,0.000586336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97878253,0.017802238,0.0010807508,0.00066674856,0.0013128975,0.00035476795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009378704,0.00043665228,0.00053921103,0.0019238318,0.0066814423,0.014885742,0.0011443883,0.005124874,0.0039537167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01794812,0.00033693257,0.00040959578,0.0016130544,0.037132405,0.019193938,0.004039909,0.01160674,0.0015427603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004397714,0.0000035280386,0.000039148723,0.0000920696,0.0000031798484,0.00004070831,0.0053152516,0.000044441564,0.0000488991,0.96390826,0.022148289,0.008351911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000813212,0.000012023676,0.000118088465,0.00067292067,0.0000073950782,0.00013459363,0.00468248,0.00012595256,0.0002067286,0.552406,0.44161555,0.000010123858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016354278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021525074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014885742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004557747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050759055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049599886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391052538","doi":"10.52610/rhs.v27i87.309","title":"Rhetorical Argumentation: The Copenhagen School","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica Scandinavica","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0601283556361094,"score_gpt":0.29787429134882065,"score_spread":0.23774593571271124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391052538","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019981242,0.59047693,0.005591109,0.0707781,0.00391369,0.000024272855,0.0003957163,0.00011668539,0.32670537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3474001,0.38074204,0.009674438,0.0066769114,0.0052098637,0.00015878309,0.00085732044,0.00079677283,0.24848382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162114,0.0036062656,0.0006294317,0.0011556338,0.002341084,0.0006464309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081916,0.0053495322,0.0006499905,0.00076069497,0.001533019,0.00088758307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008948339,0.0011921001,0.0014597018,0.0042652623,0.0065894285,0.017731681,0.0013569491,0.0071245413,0.014414058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016523456,0.0017046429,0.0008447837,0.0066788034,0.013543243,0.015129832,0.0050919517,0.0061391536,0.005563073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006739499,0.000040920266,0.0002877957,0.0005056131,0.000021505777,0.00007976836,0.0041253697,0.00063181965,0.000076986435,0.7516019,0.19078776,0.051773164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024714182,0.000011590354,0.00090963766,0.0016181517,0.000016585578,0.00007649845,0.0017772681,0.00031507396,0.000086824424,0.19945456,0.79567903,0.000030030396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06512231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06938706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06512231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02192113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017688321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15904969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391145907","doi":"10.1111/jore.12467","title":"Why Gaps Matter—A Negative Hermeneutical Approach to the Reconciliation Process in the Diocese of British Columbia Based on the Example of Bishop Logan's “Sacred Journey”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.10433744562849878,"score_gpt":0.3055058466439625,"score_spread":0.20116840101546374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391145907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32390147,0.005536074,0.020552982,0.08840765,0.0010924957,0.00019799256,0.00006033642,0.00017753607,0.56007344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733496,0.00047666888,0.0023537632,0.0018000072,0.000036918573,0.000048699385,0.000013378775,0.0000737684,0.021847159],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856536,0.010407979,0.00019159229,0.00062861055,0.0017211828,0.0013970516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903197,0.006003949,0.00048760418,0.0006714094,0.0016680561,0.00084935885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009575715,0.0005629939,0.0005259928,0.0022156832,0.04150856,0.015293329,0.0027563993,0.0047318353,0.00276877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014473895,0.0004102566,0.0001875367,0.0018639013,0.071126655,0.0058824485,0.008309698,0.008036308,0.0002983763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027597616,0.000022210059,0.00052316237,0.0000685617,0.000003735544,0.00085724966,0.6693868,0.00016465332,0.0005438903,0.31243747,0.00616558,0.0097990995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009153961,0.000021015503,0.0009596271,0.00040904334,0.000009681307,0.0005034206,0.70385855,0.00063785614,0.0007839766,0.052817635,0.2399294,0.000060623697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40141687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5432458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5985831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041188087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03412664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79816073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391194369","doi":"10.51644/9781771122238-009","title":"Lament for a Hockey Nation, Don Cherry, and the Apparatus of Canadian Celebrity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lament; Advertising; Art; Literature; Business","score_opus":0.08015270942584869,"score_gpt":0.2246265101739988,"score_spread":0.14447380074815008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391194369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017635036,0.013497894,0.0013127598,0.12939124,0.0013808652,0.000030003197,0.00017095983,0.000066958724,0.8365143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5067321,0.0044964277,0.0011380792,0.016025642,0.0005207841,0.000032697866,0.000066214154,0.00019732089,0.47079083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978968,0.0005289133,0.00003423126,0.00025972357,0.0006951353,0.00058512035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971505,0.001254067,0.00008935925,0.0001346291,0.0009791622,0.00039234658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029037804,0.0005330962,0.00039641,0.001955318,0.036705345,0.01396356,0.0013560803,0.0052906536,0.015723282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067892633,0.00039721344,0.00023422691,0.002230457,0.029410658,0.00672518,0.0021786876,0.007045238,0.0013802266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001886209,0.000005691571,0.00022663896,0.000027646218,0.0000029111873,0.00005810338,0.029948946,0.00004678891,0.00008384307,0.86537725,0.09577308,0.00843025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077768545,0.0000069665016,0.0008753674,0.00022521593,0.000012808043,0.00007063395,0.036420148,0.00010138526,0.000243321,0.056428388,0.9055605,0.00004745799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9349131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9698324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0650869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05846147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06245357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42416966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391820584","doi":"10.46539/gmd.v6i1.447","title":"Forms of Historical Oblivion and Figures of Silence in Commemorative Practices of the Black Lives Matter Movement: A Comparative Analysis of Media Discourses in English-Speaking Countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Galactica Media Journal of Media Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Movement (music); History; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08942543249469169,"score_gpt":0.34269437002110315,"score_spread":0.25326893752641144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391820584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756649,0.0013014185,0.0005093936,0.0010618769,0.00003865302,0.000021186166,0.000045293986,0.000008075637,0.021349188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979327,0.0006681285,0.00013382701,0.00008646885,0.000019366256,0.000016425336,0.000018262239,0.000012120133,0.0011128287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994224,0.0038924525,0.00020499493,0.00027014877,0.0006678676,0.0007404584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811399,0.014506101,0.0018349875,0.0006072606,0.0013895012,0.0005222129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005870206,0.00040127174,0.00060514756,0.0066775577,0.011305031,0.007974174,0.0010557319,0.0014088813,0.0022728506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015400421,0.000369351,0.00023184353,0.0048123645,0.021812038,0.0054250904,0.0057912758,0.0019633595,0.00015992549],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013252123,0.0000025737227,0.00086425367,0.00002998206,0.0000016878417,0.00016314907,0.99542147,0.0000052445434,0.0002057604,0.0016965119,0.000055577217,0.0015405137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011235585,0.000009509348,0.005532219,0.00012856197,0.000005140046,0.000108917615,0.9862606,0.000024154602,0.00023263053,0.0001839108,0.007505228,0.000007935181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067767695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09565895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067767695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009248506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040708897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13474643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392239837","doi":"10.4324/9781032719979-8","title":"Do citizens even want to hear the truth?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08366677302328213,"score_gpt":0.2597219015326676,"score_spread":0.17605512850938548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392239837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01603984,0.011985168,0.006502673,0.33398902,0.0037255578,0.000040239225,0.00009861107,0.00012078096,0.6274981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65128213,0.011609881,0.0045748223,0.089451656,0.0038261712,0.0001334468,0.00015726844,0.00026484704,0.23869978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937669,0.003852045,0.0001483334,0.00037074354,0.0013634244,0.000498559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872273,0.010332208,0.0005813666,0.00051962293,0.00086834864,0.00047116258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006705261,0.00033520535,0.0002959035,0.00081753,0.0053060055,0.01261821,0.0004940223,0.0045166523,0.008819288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01753364,0.00025519833,0.00027417194,0.0011695676,0.016167413,0.013586712,0.0026924387,0.00597312,0.0028420002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036957204,0.000027566552,0.0011094668,0.00022617582,0.000010796205,0.0002556456,0.05488103,0.00010846469,0.0004352066,0.74875236,0.1263129,0.06784348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009300835,0.00002675754,0.0008228442,0.00042967702,0.000012042135,0.0002199619,0.02356807,0.00015651454,0.00042867957,0.16786025,0.80644596,0.000019956402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023658639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038936813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01261821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025317855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022246153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035461187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392528416","doi":"10.58680/ce20065832","title":"Chronotopes: Forms of Time in Rhetorical Argument","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"College English","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Argument (complex analysis); Rhetorical criticism; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01700706198831468,"score_gpt":0.2160875562430698,"score_spread":0.19908049425475513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392528416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13712169,0.007552514,0.26534486,0.024360912,0.0015568403,0.00028125173,0.00017873371,0.00029126336,0.563312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967709,0.0011456651,0.021252109,0.00080096413,0.0003359597,0.00021434452,0.00006668285,0.00012839952,0.008346987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930754,0.0051687537,0.0002110798,0.00041229965,0.0007957211,0.0003367485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744872,0.021324826,0.0016642405,0.0012358531,0.0009416739,0.00034628966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072376034,0.0007116117,0.0004969084,0.0044550956,0.005473992,0.008772647,0.001185905,0.0024543584,0.00607849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022425637,0.0005085616,0.00070228387,0.0040653027,0.024027407,0.02593523,0.006041214,0.0035085543,0.00055697764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023180619,0.000006125312,0.00013652374,0.000038549184,0.0000031251516,0.00008806552,0.018504828,0.00008660036,0.00020736265,0.97619957,0.00047357063,0.004232456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004329175,0.000055207955,0.00071405206,0.00027475363,0.000016213118,0.00044327788,0.024406796,0.0017133515,0.00089670985,0.8675035,0.10390024,0.000032582604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095294596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001175289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008772647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00434049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011742237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038276553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392670233","doi":"10.22210/govor.2019.36.02","title":"More artful methods: Techniques of narrative in argumentation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Govor/Speech","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Persuasion; Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Power (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.040965671564079646,"score_gpt":0.3488915308543228,"score_spread":0.30792585929024313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392670233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010201472,0.019570984,0.6568839,0.02210259,0.0017914269,0.00034459366,0.00010500767,0.0005702745,0.2884297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50102717,0.01113616,0.42096668,0.003228624,0.001968722,0.0013429545,0.0001535875,0.000799398,0.059376653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97808963,0.01907387,0.0003649199,0.0007933491,0.0013470442,0.00033116498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97919035,0.016998095,0.00085481495,0.0021126398,0.00043275979,0.00041147516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015734252,0.0013793986,0.00080593734,0.004841477,0.0053613377,0.016691644,0.0026291232,0.0035621924,0.010285752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018076554,0.0006681682,0.0015792134,0.0034159755,0.042954236,0.022869991,0.007365986,0.0057265637,0.0018597374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015030365,0.000010362958,0.000042961132,0.0001311534,0.0000079581605,0.000047566067,0.018863345,0.0001623106,0.00014985546,0.9684047,0.0019013251,0.01026347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000231549,0.000019692243,0.000080178135,0.0002816613,0.000009646638,0.00017613027,0.006071145,0.0009110374,0.00035597145,0.81070524,0.18134904,0.000017076693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088162883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013006998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016691644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038845467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018496423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08321166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392954736","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-51154-7_9","title":"Conclusion: Post-Truth About the War","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Post war; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Ancient history","score_opus":0.05246387803968711,"score_gpt":0.2466831383849254,"score_spread":0.1942192603452383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392954736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046264897,0.0073746075,0.0038320834,0.25659484,0.016249733,0.00006253554,0.00045961564,0.00009772334,0.7107024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1475268,0.0037957504,0.0010742673,0.10580064,0.007583049,0.00009690633,0.00035675173,0.00022434912,0.7335414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992586,0.0002559168,0.000020217178,0.00011429621,0.00021436426,0.0001365565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986426,0.0007510128,0.000057635272,0.0000760584,0.0003774362,0.00009532521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013520194,0.0003799961,0.00029393082,0.0008080574,0.0028538515,0.005784501,0.0011130096,0.006090096,0.049766548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039070626,0.00011810161,0.00027022886,0.00074377167,0.0041604023,0.0068859323,0.0015743312,0.0061557074,0.012508038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022892249,0.000010790313,0.000055834418,0.00008614943,0.0000031442446,0.000073782794,0.0022756653,0.000039510567,0.00010913046,0.763426,0.2246221,0.009274988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010648269,0.000011290358,0.0003272,0.0003674126,0.000006868499,0.00010516062,0.0047095483,0.000081138,0.00043502462,0.17505689,0.8188794,0.000009366081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048071994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006530111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049766548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028229095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021791023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16648567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394360416","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.1044211.v1","title":"Places and People: Rhetorical Constructions of “Community” in a Canadian Environmental Risk Assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Environmental planning; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Geography; Linguistics; Environmental science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0473199591373978,"score_gpt":0.27032510407063176,"score_spread":0.22300514493323395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394360416","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07214967,0.0022638633,0.0014146954,0.0020858967,0.00013949312,0.00036468983,0.85934484,0.0004911165,0.061745677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15845472,0.002512681,0.0053414283,0.00055317796,0.000070565446,0.0013567125,0.80166686,0.00031279423,0.0297311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718374,0.00057951116,0.00017948361,0.00033005132,0.0012912682,0.00043585268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906879,0.0040454785,0.0006250832,0.00097363023,0.0031208012,0.00054710347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028155902,0.0005860684,0.00045564046,0.013241433,0.0052732565,0.0039375834,0.0019115494,0.0009680438,0.014058789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01756722,0.00032315816,0.00046768878,0.026354937,0.0021351012,0.0019389319,0.0038374823,0.0013970535,0.0028787835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002083015,0.00009410802,0.043463185,0.0030686716,0.00006732612,0.00040577602,0.04583289,0.0011264777,0.0007289867,0.034720827,0.80466557,0.06561787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033891618,0.000009817134,0.079525106,0.0008566112,0.000032327516,0.00008133782,0.021239793,0.0008351932,0.00051368464,0.0017199047,0.8950892,0.0000631188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95570445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97399974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022202777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023214884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16109318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394464219","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.1044211","title":"Places and People: Rhetorical Constructions of “Community” in a Canadian Environmental Risk Assessment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sociology; Geography; Environmental planning; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0473199591373978,"score_gpt":0.27032510407063176,"score_spread":0.22300514493323395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394464219","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07214967,0.0022638633,0.0014146954,0.0020858967,0.00013949312,0.00036468983,0.85934484,0.0004911165,0.061745677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15845472,0.002512681,0.0053414283,0.00055317796,0.000070565446,0.0013567125,0.80166686,0.00031279423,0.0297311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718374,0.00057951116,0.00017948361,0.00033005132,0.0012912682,0.00043585268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906879,0.0040454785,0.0006250832,0.00097363023,0.0031208012,0.00054710347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028155902,0.0005860684,0.00045564046,0.013241433,0.0052732565,0.0039375834,0.0019115494,0.0009680438,0.014058789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01756722,0.00032315816,0.00046768878,0.026354937,0.0021351012,0.0019389319,0.0038374823,0.0013970535,0.0028787835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002083015,0.00009410802,0.043463185,0.0030686716,0.00006732612,0.00040577602,0.04583289,0.0011264777,0.0007289867,0.034720827,0.80466557,0.06561787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033891618,0.000009817134,0.079525106,0.0008566112,0.000032327516,0.00008133782,0.021239793,0.0008351932,0.00051368464,0.0017199047,0.8950892,0.0000631188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95570445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97399974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04429555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022202777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023214884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16109318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394685037","doi":"10.25071/e5100b16","title":"Obama, Canada, and civil society South and North","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.016114179011830997,"score_gpt":0.165212943074762,"score_spread":0.14909876406293102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394685037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11242453,0.046118096,0.00023025129,0.30049083,0.0016086744,0.000025427826,0.00073903345,0.000051878153,0.5383113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169556,0.019991785,0.00027020366,0.023746952,0.00045366533,0.000034153672,0.0001904757,0.00008683128,0.13827044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805695,0.00019580027,0.000035757657,0.00014161158,0.0005496782,0.0010201283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456644,0.001945372,0.0004535401,0.00009647962,0.0015320773,0.0014061921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016751344,0.00033168757,0.000477311,0.0028025575,0.031229114,0.014285344,0.00094735855,0.0031304876,0.019837921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062746694,0.0002568607,0.00021509499,0.00634018,0.0116376765,0.004139771,0.003580796,0.005153828,0.0005528374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014105368,0.000043009095,0.014138021,0.0004764138,0.000034054225,0.00040262277,0.098805524,0.00018076759,0.000455435,0.55543065,0.2670222,0.06287025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014794745,0.000010244766,0.025310947,0.00079190265,0.00004793895,0.00006317842,0.15842451,0.000057557587,0.00030923582,0.011715042,0.8032064,0.000048240356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09378854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09378854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16484527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6804867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843725","doi":"10.4000/aad.8277","title":"Christopher Tindale: Exploring the Cultural Foundations of Rhetoric and Reason","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation et analyse du discours","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0875440387876914,"score_gpt":0.33046826536769125,"score_spread":0.24292422657999985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0891209,0.0341622,0.015758654,0.6375434,0.0060555753,0.00022990201,0.00007460007,0.00013117454,0.21692371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749994,0.012966742,0.014705671,0.053415593,0.0013133729,0.00049250707,0.000050571332,0.0002900941,0.04176607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870948,0.00861471,0.00021484023,0.0010696587,0.0022351027,0.00077082653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520474,0.041879807,0.0011337812,0.0005618689,0.0028041222,0.001573012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014163541,0.00060533674,0.00073607353,0.0031192077,0.015090377,0.014829697,0.0025650715,0.008190958,0.0037398683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042721927,0.0006673943,0.00043127598,0.0025905247,0.0386866,0.01923965,0.0060739717,0.013433936,0.0004453156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038919196,0.000040774874,0.0008527143,0.00023561886,0.0000116641395,0.0014942114,0.42496443,0.00020248053,0.00074965187,0.4692095,0.08033538,0.021864759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001887208,0.000033503933,0.0011741135,0.0011941389,0.000013597755,0.0011618305,0.21836531,0.0006405245,0.0009680914,0.08081018,0.6955213,0.00009843701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036612652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049062844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036612652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014157856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013489727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10272288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395099473","doi":"10.3138/jcs-2022-0034","title":"Tracing E-race-sures, Finding Reclamations: Embodied Perspectives of “Canadian” Immersion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NorQuest College; Athabasca University; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Race (biology); Tracing; Immersion (mathematics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Gender studies; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15747885518092739,"score_gpt":0.3117880662753396,"score_spread":0.15430921109441223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395099473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49655667,0.004972466,0.011165627,0.06322972,0.00087528664,0.00012516428,0.00041710783,0.0002548459,0.422403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974416,0.0008868667,0.0012891166,0.0016179209,0.0000324261,0.000021289663,0.000051626612,0.00012375796,0.021561034],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080056,0.0038667687,0.00016821868,0.0008146484,0.0020746707,0.0022751438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924936,0.003097218,0.00036311345,0.00044680035,0.0020559244,0.0015433014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072745145,0.00091108686,0.0007025248,0.0034480763,0.05632553,0.021261567,0.0031588464,0.004339087,0.008069419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012436364,0.00061412476,0.000521602,0.004259228,0.06444121,0.008550012,0.0126679605,0.0075092344,0.0005020818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018704006,0.000008240502,0.0006684417,0.000034384317,0.0000047792673,0.00040029848,0.93639016,0.00009886044,0.0002761663,0.054861795,0.003219409,0.004018867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025196027,0.0000076182196,0.0006086328,0.0001249015,0.000009164121,0.000168252,0.86350995,0.0001748183,0.00031293542,0.004841616,0.1301999,0.00003962495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95645636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09433398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09433398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08335324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68444407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395675462","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/k43ts","title":"Remembering Women Journalists as Advocates and Community Contributors: Metajournalistic Discourse in Obituaries from the US, Canada, and the Philippines","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Gender studies; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.030142292544509525,"score_gpt":0.2594862173697366,"score_spread":0.22934392482522706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395675462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682692,0.0016205028,0.00035247207,0.011029785,0.00022558814,0.000030320454,0.00008287037,0.000027210748,0.018362025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946754,0.000819796,0.0001615093,0.0012515646,0.00008866268,0.000023218901,0.00003103094,0.000037570004,0.0029111113],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931124,0.003853697,0.000206774,0.00040578004,0.001189001,0.0012322579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93958384,0.041945115,0.005406103,0.0011742528,0.0057017743,0.006188943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013262294,0.0006333053,0.00073274877,0.004224164,0.028857734,0.014809828,0.0015933932,0.00264935,0.0028454643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034459323,0.00052219967,0.00018645835,0.005234656,0.01818208,0.0054634367,0.008659748,0.004407545,0.00024076542],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030589075,0.000011076526,0.0038186896,0.00004683984,0.000005140944,0.00027055884,0.9909757,0.000009267733,0.00030867246,0.001259929,0.0009105843,0.002353074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025650208,0.00001001871,0.0031738183,0.00008816612,0.000009792181,0.00005882031,0.9790237,0.000031211774,0.00022036623,0.00015164092,0.01721875,0.000011150169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3341345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47796398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66586554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019534754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028780906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66437924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396534801","doi":"10.1386/eme_00191_7","title":"Rethinking the three origin stories for communication studies in North America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Explorations in Media Ecology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; History; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.2819985465587463,"score_gpt":0.36834478911606594,"score_spread":0.08634624255731965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396534801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21708699,0.02287846,0.006388915,0.6480992,0.0033762292,0.0000862365,0.00010376268,0.00006847732,0.101911776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952947,0.0067365416,0.0036781444,0.02595771,0.00083179714,0.00016418779,0.00004373306,0.00019313938,0.009447693],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97611135,0.017831141,0.00060554274,0.0009768473,0.0025200036,0.0019550498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94389075,0.042815473,0.002661132,0.0013122825,0.005504783,0.0038156165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025407227,0.0010175514,0.0009518965,0.004604652,0.0451729,0.02581551,0.0037952452,0.00750246,0.0032651408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030736847,0.000774909,0.00046072094,0.004328515,0.07973653,0.03143416,0.016304558,0.019262623,0.00031480542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057627003,0.000008981416,0.00063483213,0.000058209203,0.0000026573407,0.00021670472,0.9371919,0.0000111107665,0.00008357892,0.055537768,0.0037854454,0.0024631186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004310037,0.000005683967,0.00088742486,0.0005298834,0.000007378701,0.0001582841,0.90867895,0.00006460591,0.00012212494,0.0095535265,0.07997428,0.000013590236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19339179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38852063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0449816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023322564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38453227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399293138","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v14n5p271","title":"Reframing “Literature as Equipment for Living:” Kenneth Burke's Theory and the Social Function of Literature","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Function (biology); Epistemology; Social function; Computer science; Philosophy; Psychology; Humanities; Social psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.010703883540256335,"score_gpt":0.2608091875226149,"score_spread":0.2501053039823586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399293138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034029156,0.07208522,0.05990003,0.36136115,0.0056490246,0.00009426005,0.000048832546,0.00016215416,0.46667016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969885,0.023790153,0.013799286,0.024820922,0.0037019004,0.00036940814,0.000035319346,0.00026768577,0.036226764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98120475,0.015307092,0.0002615378,0.0008270904,0.0016934781,0.0007060227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842858,0.012099486,0.0007659102,0.00083236746,0.0013007391,0.0007157147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013079049,0.0010368564,0.00094797986,0.0075554564,0.018667134,0.025688471,0.002903565,0.009871644,0.0022274696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015730293,0.0005162147,0.0005850975,0.0044461037,0.12782079,0.029866854,0.0114763845,0.008826288,0.0007500834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028370252,0.0000047290364,0.000051949624,0.000035095938,0.0000019782165,0.00008739507,0.046468638,0.000060254806,0.000033149354,0.9470738,0.0033888335,0.0027912988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062252425,0.000013462858,0.00009059562,0.00038778115,0.000004876715,0.00022831497,0.040138107,0.00020588393,0.00015165373,0.68623245,0.2725231,0.00001742446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005336952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006187358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025688471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009198856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062715425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06916946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399512846","doi":"10.1093/ccc/tcae013","title":"Marcha das Vadias: performing disidentification in transnational protests","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication Culture and Critique","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Solidarity; Gender studies; Sociology; Oppression; Ideology; Narrative; Media studies; Political science; Linguistics; Literature; Politics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.03796280684317345,"score_gpt":0.3209600544740257,"score_spread":0.28299724763085227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399512846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67792016,0.0023859635,0.014962537,0.025005816,0.0007618938,0.00015467126,0.00006643009,0.00020323032,0.2785392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947647,0.00018252947,0.00078164705,0.00034428635,0.000025116684,0.000022210234,0.0000061387,0.000021892312,0.003851504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958033,0.0032481598,0.00007184659,0.00022480096,0.00037661474,0.00027532238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459684,0.0037110236,0.00050173287,0.00056518393,0.00031735408,0.00030775147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045329137,0.00042669973,0.00025932532,0.00109976,0.008091659,0.0037604284,0.00063798996,0.0012776684,0.0027772828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011001357,0.00019458552,0.00024290029,0.0007312061,0.014862168,0.0023558494,0.0056955665,0.0018514689,0.00022413155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057808047,0.00003408259,0.0027767043,0.00025786174,0.0000116688925,0.0010748958,0.7465824,0.00025085648,0.0049586995,0.20770872,0.004735669,0.03155063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017456256,0.00010787003,0.0038396076,0.00083615334,0.000025022753,0.0013605667,0.61203736,0.0012125627,0.005616311,0.02688913,0.3480197,0.00003822321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007563456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01836975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008091659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005134408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003477112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037252903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400412201","doi":"10.22329/il.v44i2.8753","title":"Books Recieved","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0739256988437811,"score_gpt":0.2824477417592249,"score_spread":0.2085220429154438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400412201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006338338,0.084284715,0.0016899155,0.011483669,0.020069147,0.000062174004,0.00282394,0.00034789022,0.87860465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016258062,0.014153735,0.0008596082,0.0020262585,0.0014159007,0.00003104819,0.0009895911,0.00018906673,0.9787089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915016,0.00008986746,0.000041714327,0.00014066778,0.0005230111,0.00005460686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.00016649242,0.000047417587,0.00011523798,0.00048505064,0.000073335126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004646303,0.00081503426,0.0010995064,0.0043986444,0.0018376671,0.0074377307,0.001313889,0.0019341349,0.32983187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022232102,0.0004813273,0.00058898784,0.00829665,0.00213241,0.00388102,0.0017496394,0.0035776566,0.20158295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030000612,0.00002070987,0.00006274713,0.00049544306,0.0000075605567,0.00005702304,0.00018645285,0.000085734326,0.00030843937,0.0387597,0.8626367,0.09734945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028177012,0.0000030656527,0.00010363975,0.00021343352,0.0000022658492,0.0000390848,0.000057091387,0.000017606639,0.000055808872,0.0030458672,0.9964563,0.0000029842995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008959509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019664144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67016816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030124292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027160316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9559135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595904","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2024i2024.79214","title":"Guest Editorial: How Can We Know When the Hermeneutics of Suspicion Becomes Suspect?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Hermeneutics; Need to know; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer security; Criminology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023429186590967214,"score_gpt":0.2539985180251797,"score_spread":0.2305693314342125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595904","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025630821,0.0015119901,0.00007110872,0.057749517,0.9395954,0.000014456039,0.000023835253,0.00002524154,0.000982833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036889096,0.0011731468,0.00006309852,0.025576256,0.9682165,0.000024759152,0.000012166068,0.000031371685,0.0045338785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881841,0.0030169196,0.0012193834,0.0013243662,0.0053845174,0.0008706844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9405638,0.030910844,0.0027221213,0.001510673,0.017750688,0.0065418724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014184223,0.0039205533,0.004627767,0.005529506,0.007268707,0.013800796,0.0048611066,0.035650574,0.015523064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07647752,0.001580086,0.0028908013,0.0019487573,0.005732121,0.006184362,0.003173586,0.032417838,0.009320918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002531579,0.0000097248185,0.000017471235,0.00010220806,0.000011159443,0.00014536604,0.000028059465,0.000011320206,0.00003400072,0.00034813763,0.99746215,0.0018050002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094075745,0.000038055336,0.00036224056,0.000953725,0.00009048651,0.00043625565,0.0002145208,0.00026614367,0.00013759517,0.0026413538,0.9947284,0.000037098245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025762194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067282165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035650574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00497732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068905153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07501423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400610514","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2016y2016.53289","title":"Secrets in the Open: An Exercise in Interpretive Writing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Character (mathematics); Aesthetics; Psychology; Secrecy; Psychoanalysis; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.0588385840620871,"score_gpt":0.3005665254149505,"score_spread":0.2417279413528634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400610514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104863435,0.013363736,0.34758598,0.10368099,0.0043454976,0.00051676354,0.000099458324,0.00063008687,0.42491403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94968754,0.001883758,0.03476558,0.0029049309,0.0010542566,0.0003706921,0.00003495751,0.00033309576,0.008965232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9003368,0.088814355,0.0016832642,0.0024197444,0.0049112476,0.0018346359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8953813,0.09208811,0.0023774276,0.0065616397,0.0021842367,0.0014072218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07616795,0.0014285458,0.0014142448,0.0051440774,0.020849347,0.02757192,0.0039387136,0.0076281377,0.0031851758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071345694,0.0010110297,0.0010308203,0.0030400816,0.1611876,0.03532961,0.018942475,0.011235568,0.0007909615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022806578,0.000016739265,0.0001437483,0.00008617946,0.000008467471,0.0002893777,0.44365177,0.0001340224,0.00031027594,0.5493811,0.0011247239,0.004830836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003106807,0.00005987231,0.00021040952,0.001025801,0.000020133624,0.00090751954,0.24623051,0.0013606343,0.000991164,0.62422997,0.124880664,0.000052288433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018203079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016139231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07616795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058368444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005020123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40281945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401080234","doi":"10.55765/atps.i25.2429","title":"Constructing the enemy in the process of virtue signalling: a critical reflexion on media representations of Jordan Peterson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale animation territoires et pratiques socioculturelles","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Adversary; Process (computing); Signalling; Sociology; Aesthetics; Communication; Epistemology; Media studies; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security; Cell biology; Programming language; Biology","score_opus":0.05960282267226336,"score_gpt":0.35601697294067286,"score_spread":0.2964141502684095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401080234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25541922,0.01856618,0.031290732,0.38313648,0.004174814,0.00025377766,0.000075288095,0.00020933335,0.30687425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96336955,0.0038299325,0.0037910892,0.0123110935,0.0009942288,0.00013414236,0.000013725938,0.00024736286,0.0153088365],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97467107,0.020216655,0.00028990133,0.000921911,0.0028727262,0.0010277714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942017,0.049724963,0.0022680599,0.0011095887,0.0038360641,0.0010442556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02772385,0.0010959134,0.0010844009,0.0040999353,0.02863413,0.024346998,0.0031219667,0.00806937,0.0018521495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042818774,0.0006683293,0.0004271971,0.0027389352,0.119226545,0.018348124,0.011918711,0.013435755,0.00033302658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024881416,0.00001405032,0.00016125041,0.000079344085,0.000004576421,0.00045758192,0.7965533,0.00009868515,0.000205851,0.19544509,0.004120496,0.002834921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013098913,0.000033791028,0.00025803648,0.00068143266,0.000011758666,0.0006061288,0.7631809,0.0003467115,0.0010106763,0.05506671,0.17873622,0.000054543474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015630906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018875426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02863413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014168968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013548791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1466195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401821909","doi":"10.1111/cars.12482","title":"Building a new environmentalism: News media access and framing in Canada's environmental movement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Framing (construction); Environmentalism; Environmental justice; Social movement; Transformative learning; Political science; Indigenous; Ecological modernization; Sociology; Environmental communication; Narrative; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05846897546514804,"score_gpt":0.25644272629133225,"score_spread":0.1979737508261842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401821909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44179034,0.008268831,0.004668855,0.08711596,0.00094470766,0.00013447371,0.00053092086,0.00013196282,0.4564139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98129255,0.0022282028,0.001144817,0.002650905,0.00016629169,0.000034831115,0.000080483536,0.00007039999,0.012331404],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934088,0.0022174367,0.00013910721,0.0005486827,0.0024598779,0.0012260053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867605,0.0076907114,0.0010037957,0.00044243818,0.0027756884,0.0013268483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070195454,0.00057741354,0.00041230928,0.008146972,0.028325306,0.023514686,0.001528633,0.0027450717,0.006101759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013898941,0.00046004428,0.0002915621,0.008183237,0.03272061,0.0060800486,0.00688754,0.00399787,0.00031849652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059673173,0.00004063338,0.009181915,0.00022836984,0.000020175672,0.0008219256,0.76856583,0.00020308828,0.00089803967,0.1667759,0.0128919985,0.04031254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017624609,0.000021342012,0.018595362,0.00073851325,0.000046615995,0.00017011465,0.55515796,0.00046355525,0.0008144563,0.013988778,0.4099081,0.00007752912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9411773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09557931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09557931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08322938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69347966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402091197","doi":"10.1353/vcr.2024.a936082","title":"Private Opinion, Public Speech: The Continued Importance of Talk in Victorian Politics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Public opinion; Political science; History; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06750093591545588,"score_gpt":0.30022215531325563,"score_spread":0.23272121939779977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402091197","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027053144,0.92212176,0.00028134265,0.06125943,0.0018418579,0.00001005022,0.00005663035,0.0000050977133,0.011718503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12399877,0.8300904,0.00060800853,0.035113014,0.003700647,0.00005476347,0.00008661159,0.000045698413,0.0063020946],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858065,0.0068779467,0.0008651029,0.0007804184,0.0043595755,0.0013105477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95173126,0.03281131,0.003676003,0.0010276315,0.009360118,0.0013936444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023878956,0.0003594053,0.0015930898,0.0040110475,0.002839666,0.011807166,0.0014608246,0.0061386656,0.0038192715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041747414,0.00055030367,0.00048788972,0.007882787,0.009884413,0.0075246347,0.003460609,0.008021349,0.00059232477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026298157,0.000042540796,0.0011309397,0.027758207,0.0002275831,0.00018289442,0.015929176,0.00034546969,0.0010588221,0.23470704,0.11036924,0.607985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043863347,0.00009061979,0.010850601,0.028525284,0.000234852,0.00022488135,0.008192112,0.00026853624,0.0004353755,0.031959675,0.9190871,0.00008706172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12579161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23850918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12579161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024733389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042381376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25011885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402191201","doi":"10.17077/2151-2957.33739","title":"“Smart drugs,” Gender, and the Rhetorical Turning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Poroi","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.0655856120690234,"score_gpt":0.2707338327340489,"score_spread":0.20514822066502547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402191201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070501246,0.0070605604,0.011364816,0.046289045,0.00075360993,0.000029321038,0.000034192293,0.00006888693,0.8638983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98010373,0.00089578336,0.0011494064,0.0030617258,0.00014625395,0.000018903062,0.000008310311,0.000052560717,0.014563162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464464,0.0037862817,0.00007544116,0.0002773903,0.00081422034,0.00040207416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607617,0.002677633,0.00035769606,0.00026552402,0.00030871108,0.00031423147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005571084,0.00041495112,0.00027095331,0.001289634,0.008058121,0.007636299,0.00059375656,0.0018727937,0.0030818617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006576615,0.00019472715,0.000157868,0.00089258025,0.053876985,0.006034932,0.004638615,0.0035541637,0.00039400187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010378639,0.0000039211914,0.00015525904,0.000025623105,0.0000016577577,0.00004338933,0.035992604,0.00003254654,0.0001856013,0.9591633,0.0011926345,0.0031932064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002791914,0.000059917755,0.0009674553,0.0004733432,0.000018453002,0.0003592029,0.09172953,0.00032716687,0.001536261,0.42879266,0.4756704,0.000037806672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070982734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009263613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008058121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050638868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034645642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036741257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402507587","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2022y2022.76169","title":"Spoilers, Triggers, and the Hermeneutics of Ignorance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Stupidity; Hermeneutics; Framing (construction); Epistemology; Realm; Sketch; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Law; History","score_opus":0.019984261588009283,"score_gpt":0.20409444552787145,"score_spread":0.18411018393986217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402507587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15727983,0.014551444,0.1349999,0.12698026,0.002245228,0.00023801804,0.00014802461,0.00034846997,0.5632088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795704,0.001463116,0.0055193333,0.0021432673,0.00046854152,0.00011148148,0.000023265722,0.00015134712,0.010549356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748839,0.018466903,0.0007494872,0.0019609916,0.0028178128,0.0011208314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97017896,0.023348399,0.0018673872,0.0026070205,0.0013984018,0.00059981283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024388326,0.0007316811,0.00081402913,0.003726103,0.0097553395,0.016158285,0.0015091046,0.0052375747,0.0037889672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03629922,0.00088070397,0.00063180923,0.0022677481,0.09725227,0.025524193,0.00786982,0.007796134,0.0006781291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017437233,0.000004727306,0.00018482673,0.000036013924,0.0000032904684,0.00007323321,0.0472883,0.0000671886,0.00012402813,0.94922256,0.0007705343,0.0022078848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022819917,0.000033718447,0.0004877346,0.00047519399,0.000016291919,0.00025712838,0.043384295,0.00052380905,0.0008019863,0.83811456,0.11584157,0.000040839852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002628852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017178219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024388326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006174051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038802149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12897933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403393736","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2024.2413325","title":"Storytelling for Social Justice: Reconceptualizing Invisibility, Legitimacy, and Self-Censorship via <i>Stories of Failure</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Legitimacy; Storytelling; Sociology; Economic Justice; Censorship; Gender studies; Social justice; Social psychology; Criminology; Narrative; Political science; Psychology; Law; Art; Politics; Literature; Optics","score_opus":0.06778057308564638,"score_gpt":0.3389754130449251,"score_spread":0.27119483995927873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403393736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3838173,0.020750714,0.104589045,0.13911456,0.0018202574,0.00032926686,0.0002574632,0.00036080676,0.3489606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97991574,0.0028425949,0.008720984,0.0016595067,0.00022171576,0.00014452246,0.000054286033,0.00011915084,0.00632141],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749723,0.022032311,0.00038198903,0.00055402436,0.0013662775,0.00069315516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9368912,0.05331071,0.003353247,0.0033805298,0.0016350417,0.0014292211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023201462,0.0011704686,0.00057051337,0.0049123093,0.01296748,0.019963076,0.0029436245,0.003992758,0.003979398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040740687,0.0005085267,0.0005336936,0.0022755393,0.0702902,0.02676588,0.014274398,0.0057198126,0.00055125594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026717886,0.000022682465,0.0012679733,0.0002286947,0.000012534202,0.00038482714,0.727188,0.00015729938,0.00025867837,0.2491474,0.0033294437,0.017975755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015840727,0.000056479355,0.0010526109,0.0013364456,0.000029268145,0.00087998674,0.6084651,0.0007477815,0.0015302979,0.18896374,0.19687864,0.000043827928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025486737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037646769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023201462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006040243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00467167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12270254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403948143","doi":"10.1017/s0047404524000897","title":"‘Wasp porn’: The discursive construction of ridicule and the right to joke about science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language in Society","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Joke; Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010182955464468365,"score_gpt":0.25837424875276943,"score_spread":0.24819129328830106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403948143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7690998,0.0031193292,0.021017952,0.017897516,0.00045942387,0.00006324004,0.00006270651,0.00013258279,0.18814746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774724,0.00014878642,0.0005698277,0.00023693676,0.00003546354,0.000011578522,0.000008990597,0.000027783326,0.0012134924],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819511,0.015063021,0.0003701535,0.0007797154,0.001105519,0.00073054666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684077,0.023800535,0.0030833464,0.0021026365,0.001471615,0.0011341163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011788231,0.00049003365,0.0005925145,0.0025158394,0.011769138,0.009328326,0.001290579,0.0024545663,0.0019935663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030936688,0.00049767224,0.00032060442,0.0012588383,0.06314522,0.00993822,0.009124987,0.0041088737,0.0002454357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020270452,0.000008995027,0.00054977165,0.000058798934,0.0000054478674,0.00032032136,0.9574817,0.000023443023,0.0005106295,0.03847571,0.0003836014,0.002161389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016402617,0.00006650001,0.002805464,0.00037201485,0.00001974927,0.001246801,0.87610596,0.00031149923,0.0013542793,0.034666713,0.08299019,0.000044457774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024699525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024925072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028998868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001950719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062342882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404470458","doi":"10.5840/symposium202428221","title":"Towards a Negative Hermeneutics: The Hermeneutics/Critical Theory Debate in a New Register","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; Register (sociolinguistics); Epistemology; Critical theory; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04754488037950038,"score_gpt":0.29262650694781883,"score_spread":0.24508162656831844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404470458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028840488,0.014526849,0.025508963,0.77434117,0.006377689,0.000052020376,0.00003953582,0.00005717468,0.15025625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139435,0.00596962,0.008872535,0.038062222,0.0052643013,0.00024039802,0.00004041622,0.00029853664,0.027308453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688849,0.024343725,0.0005750493,0.0018665512,0.0031428817,0.0011869364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632595,0.030013217,0.0012554904,0.0020085403,0.001986748,0.0014764188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04102334,0.0008416277,0.0013765332,0.004164935,0.013806761,0.030289315,0.0029738874,0.011295874,0.004907375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039585907,0.0006568509,0.0008740845,0.0026031532,0.13123205,0.04011597,0.010383085,0.024146471,0.0007365605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010939792,0.000010016454,0.000042843927,0.000019647658,0.0000014009545,0.000037000336,0.0095670875,0.000045612695,0.000031855914,0.9865761,0.0019575725,0.0016998831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021288073,0.000014882774,0.00009821366,0.0002213049,0.0000045501797,0.000054256685,0.016614562,0.00046289366,0.00015238681,0.90307224,0.07925965,0.000023845763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00681044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053713657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04102334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014401767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101721585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21695477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404739201","doi":"10.3138/utq.93.03.64","title":"David Cecchetto. <i>Listening in the Afterlife of Data: Aesthetics, Pragmatics, and Incommunication</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Afterlife; Pragmatics; Active listening; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Sociology; Communication","score_opus":0.03642055795226208,"score_gpt":0.2486823982899043,"score_spread":0.21226184033764223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404739201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062710216,0.2735568,0.0013212071,0.6192442,0.03534144,0.000034523397,0.00024114377,0.00017343528,0.06946016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037842117,0.18516149,0.0019875886,0.4071894,0.03605205,0.0001968578,0.0002558944,0.00065772707,0.33065692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794513,0.0008335634,0.00010123194,0.00023711714,0.0007029154,0.00018000496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913428,0.0054692137,0.00026133697,0.00020652941,0.0018532317,0.0008669222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021274632,0.0013417765,0.00064955396,0.0035370036,0.0094161695,0.007174908,0.0018450103,0.008571024,0.015190547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007798864,0.0006675654,0.0003687819,0.0032663033,0.007451352,0.007941412,0.0027943698,0.0086286515,0.0075561972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070915594,0.0000048847714,0.00007287335,0.000111443216,0.0000024273052,0.000044803448,0.0019838533,0.000010928214,0.00002902555,0.019846644,0.9691272,0.008758792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008070146,0.000005057528,0.00041127513,0.00043370164,0.000003950563,0.00013285116,0.0031493078,0.000028307693,0.000096725045,0.007158945,0.988557,0.000014844857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09993891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25375822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09993891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054448424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003906046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19871438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404756724","doi":"10.1080/00085006.2024.2413759","title":"Verbal armament and the demonic: Putin’s rhetorical preparation for war","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.032240906165084925,"score_gpt":0.2612363832398667,"score_spread":0.22899547707478177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404756724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23689078,0.010999625,0.008314739,0.030682972,0.001164016,0.000042742297,0.00007325519,0.00013749674,0.7116944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885834,0.0006498875,0.0004845784,0.0006473544,0.0000869626,0.00001177296,0.000016172466,0.0000352402,0.009209703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619955,0.0026351886,0.00007129402,0.00022541326,0.00044643026,0.0004222176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997649,0.0016670121,0.00024678485,0.00012055537,0.0001667303,0.00014988543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021989872,0.0006329221,0.00034586483,0.0019191143,0.013695274,0.009744107,0.0008117762,0.0027175068,0.0026892931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064437324,0.00023185923,0.00018229899,0.0016110222,0.026013926,0.0049921367,0.005637849,0.0042458326,0.00041429186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006527095,0.000015269698,0.00045114162,0.000068873494,0.0000058704095,0.0007503447,0.2544968,0.00024690173,0.00045563775,0.7273729,0.004984728,0.0110862935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028933764,0.000088907495,0.0030812512,0.00068040594,0.000024843303,0.0007394918,0.23647963,0.0008732555,0.0025228467,0.15036123,0.6050183,0.000100946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021997478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027839758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021997478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0123522505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035337529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0896222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405975979","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae098.1088","title":"THE GLOBAL PRIDE STUDY: LESSONS LEARNED AND NEXT STEPS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Innovation in Aging","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16504871630391424,"score_gpt":0.36816108541258613,"score_spread":0.2031123691086719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405975979","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07669612,0.0897346,0.008588898,0.76887596,0.0077115893,0.00056741707,0.0004923833,0.00015572074,0.047177307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72768056,0.11613099,0.042587403,0.09457495,0.0040433095,0.0019346005,0.00078941026,0.000244585,0.012014208],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884837,0.008501755,0.00034534268,0.0005404889,0.0007040265,0.0014245373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94782495,0.03419287,0.0008806388,0.0032889643,0.0060969624,0.0077156513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041965418,0.0009819785,0.0018223494,0.0030190155,0.00602682,0.010642409,0.003147032,0.0046333363,0.0075757788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02865657,0.00046945488,0.0011155466,0.0034936918,0.010150006,0.023066794,0.013552036,0.008422347,0.0010399999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023223163,0.000875083,0.020640714,0.0050627925,0.00013463396,0.002067526,0.26215118,0.00046694974,0.00044616946,0.18534361,0.10892616,0.413653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007348805,0.0002509305,0.010617323,0.011923735,0.000077248886,0.00070602645,0.58682513,0.000297993,0.00035714652,0.10590981,0.28288078,0.00008043468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014671525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029806495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041965418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054680193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021914124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22193694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405986802","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v15n1p94","title":"Repetition in Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr.’s Selected Speeches Against Social Injustice: A Contrastive Critical Discourse Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Martin luther king; Repetition (rhetorical device); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Ideology; Politics","score_opus":0.017957683348533156,"score_gpt":0.31961080032338957,"score_spread":0.3016531169748564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405986802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8840758,0.007944182,0.01772051,0.03245134,0.0009604255,0.00038561845,0.00010524642,0.00009752072,0.056259286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862076,0.0010894793,0.005923023,0.0014986513,0.00014866058,0.00016154462,0.000026312096,0.00005751882,0.004887226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842135,0.012697578,0.00041085004,0.0007096402,0.0015259961,0.00044251073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96652323,0.028402837,0.0014902077,0.0007898359,0.0022261916,0.0005676929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015008685,0.00067277654,0.0005280459,0.002640741,0.008457894,0.006168193,0.0011453873,0.0024054698,0.0012557093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024467029,0.00031291283,0.00032187966,0.0011300902,0.015994377,0.004699153,0.0039011808,0.0032374861,0.00018733046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004038731,0.000022145494,0.0006470322,0.00016763512,0.0000069532866,0.00059804216,0.9423562,0.00006201932,0.0017430288,0.043744054,0.0016647825,0.008947756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012893173,0.000089483736,0.0028718247,0.0010188968,0.000026553727,0.00085255335,0.8066886,0.00046618562,0.0041642543,0.011571065,0.17216586,0.00007178217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046902136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006329375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015008685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006775945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003445025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07937449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406550533","doi":"10.1016/s1521-6136(00)80047-0","title":"10.1016/s1521-6136(00)80047-0","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Abortion; Criminology; Political science; Medical emergency; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.028094646604353204,"score_gpt":0.17961320616327647,"score_spread":0.15151855955892327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406550533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001767456,0.00027372883,0.00042031778,0.00019532634,0.00017865344,0.00006997264,0.00040204905,0.0006107789,0.9976724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00023030349,0.00012876,0.00018230219,0.00010855521,0.000029431707,0.000038867085,0.00017605853,0.00011093627,0.99899477],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999387,0.00005336609,0.000043012984,0.00021362014,0.00018651728,0.00011636389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830097,0.000448676,0.00009138863,0.00024478242,0.00035246313,0.0005617561],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010543137,0.002820505,0.0015841939,0.0025772022,0.00276287,0.004618025,0.0032103534,0.0061014644,0.98897636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018947104,0.0010591283,0.0013588902,0.0026529573,0.0020823386,0.0062458892,0.004566838,0.0023519078,0.99201137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017420367,0.00013823912,0.00042105778,0.00052754435,0.00001736138,0.00013756956,0.00010596107,0.00022977138,0.0011534134,0.0071970606,0.43023348,0.5596643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026653363,0.0000582794,0.00035749061,0.00026189152,0.0000065969184,0.00014500259,0.000096693926,0.00008724512,0.00015669414,0.0006073652,0.9981816,0.000014495466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057654893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007100959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011023641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015261285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013948007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015723825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407830265","doi":"10.1177/13691481251317884","title":"Storytelling in the Australian 2023 voice referendum campaign","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal of Politics and International Relations","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Storytelling; Political science; Brexit; Media studies; Sociology; Public relations; Advertising; Narrative; Politics; Linguistics; Law; Business; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.07127351612641145,"score_gpt":0.30496107725893623,"score_spread":0.23368756113252478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407830265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50430876,0.001589601,0.004802322,0.028560761,0.00073553843,0.00024468228,0.00017292869,0.00012740958,0.45945802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95460653,0.0005810461,0.0017600824,0.0023211772,0.00014661333,0.00013065404,0.00006580445,0.00006332747,0.040324796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950282,0.0037741116,0.00006739422,0.00016952102,0.0005450887,0.00041580744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929803,0.004939264,0.00044429488,0.00036067012,0.00044908564,0.0008264586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004708272,0.0004193474,0.00020363928,0.0009967373,0.0079351785,0.0049189497,0.00063791615,0.002030156,0.008287506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008322887,0.0002296643,0.00019739986,0.00082830363,0.0072631286,0.0032939373,0.0045157196,0.0030139363,0.0008210604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063500156,0.000085213534,0.001607811,0.00018637054,0.000005291571,0.0009832607,0.8974238,0.00016564429,0.0011379936,0.053406194,0.015908862,0.029026134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013909581,0.00012671505,0.007278848,0.00045101962,0.000012287613,0.0004598395,0.36716118,0.00074217905,0.0016062318,0.011378804,0.610732,0.000036989313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013821456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02477501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013821456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043217693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022336151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031356752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408329245","doi":"10.1111/1467-8675.12784","title":"Are Social Imaginaries Immune to Ideology Critique?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constellations","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.046845513509808055,"score_gpt":0.3189154383159589,"score_spread":0.2720699248061509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408329245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027931245,0.025040988,0.011966244,0.47494486,0.0046112314,0.000032114065,0.00010045495,0.00012093789,0.45525193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92054003,0.011681412,0.0039048153,0.030844588,0.00885376,0.00013344243,0.00012063213,0.0002940075,0.023627192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814166,0.011701423,0.00038544036,0.0017538113,0.0033356892,0.0014069669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977472,0.014629883,0.0020745173,0.0022126718,0.0023108996,0.0013000855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015534581,0.0009786736,0.00089881674,0.0040685763,0.009799623,0.021403387,0.0023956958,0.008987994,0.01252388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03525282,0.0004022664,0.00072325324,0.0024498517,0.07932931,0.024688503,0.009555711,0.009854224,0.002316489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011422896,0.000014894272,0.00034117268,0.000054363063,0.000008969003,0.000068046305,0.016970996,0.00004812701,0.00003520517,0.96634686,0.009152791,0.006947147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019958967,0.000008997721,0.0002501617,0.0002172767,0.0000050623867,0.00008114152,0.012513903,0.00013100082,0.00008365539,0.85412973,0.132549,0.000010138856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002249223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018342773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021403387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064778943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043440005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082155704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408405213","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2016v41n3a3068","title":"Essence, Absence, Uselessness: Engaging Non-Euro-American Rhetorics Interologically","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.035260168572508716,"score_gpt":0.23976982274109862,"score_spread":0.2045096541685899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408405213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58559906,0.0047940775,0.022746883,0.013299326,0.0007296694,0.00007497257,0.000035536126,0.00010696874,0.3726136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443865,0.00027436673,0.0009880835,0.0002788679,0.00004239228,0.00001559916,0.000007796781,0.00002825322,0.003925934],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926755,0.006013572,0.00011358352,0.0002983784,0.00051070895,0.0003882439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939522,0.004779048,0.00024702534,0.00043042147,0.00033519132,0.00025598655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007468741,0.00060593593,0.00056418515,0.0016361792,0.008069156,0.007566832,0.0006821488,0.0015619938,0.0023496533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008949112,0.0002757706,0.00020142106,0.0017970615,0.021495445,0.00750571,0.0062512485,0.003401473,0.00018702456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053206644,0.000019653577,0.00097188406,0.000089763234,0.000007558955,0.00033772198,0.68783915,0.00009275352,0.0011841585,0.29742545,0.0009270961,0.011051571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032727825,0.0001008792,0.0035634062,0.00046109306,0.000054917833,0.0007227951,0.5933789,0.0012783844,0.0022269825,0.10050382,0.29762334,0.000052834417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00276287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051393523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008069156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031577866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016185319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039498985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408603581","doi":"10.3735/9781935306634.book-part-005","title":"Jonathan Mayhew: Two Discourses","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.07900969942124834,"score_gpt":0.2746986763283454,"score_spread":0.19568897690709702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408603581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026520219,0.033170413,0.0014750592,0.14750847,0.0046646837,0.000050940984,0.00007982662,0.000056626548,0.7864737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43632898,0.016448159,0.0011827112,0.02489446,0.0028453125,0.00021835165,0.000101460806,0.00019565795,0.5177849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968201,0.0019932701,0.000047441892,0.00023053528,0.00055117416,0.000357547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783957,0.0013589698,0.00012244009,0.00009624098,0.0002791726,0.0003036427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003116128,0.0007620041,0.00044444436,0.0026556195,0.016007157,0.011130722,0.0014246255,0.0048239864,0.010747018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057623386,0.0003646118,0.00023078558,0.0027412625,0.021285877,0.010871955,0.0054193125,0.006386269,0.0016460025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023432482,0.000033698718,0.00010733234,0.0000845406,0.0000022352833,0.0005722779,0.21229605,0.000036973124,0.00015900783,0.65989286,0.11760378,0.009187874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052143473,0.000006682354,0.00015144068,0.0002568755,0.000001948474,0.00015237393,0.0610586,0.00004490483,0.00013256834,0.017300874,0.920878,0.000010428183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02609094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03718098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02609094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017377317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051881378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12608182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408939714","doi":"10.3828/eir.2025.32.1.3","title":"Introduction: Romanticism, the Public Humanities, and Pedagogy: Cultivating a “Fiery Joy”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays in Romanticism","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; Humanities; Art; Pedagogy; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.04798780010812033,"score_gpt":0.28335171630833056,"score_spread":0.23536391620021024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408939714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072362567,0.0512982,0.004747479,0.43123865,0.07273345,0.000115013594,0.00040974587,0.0002095937,0.4320116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2191059,0.03476013,0.0046960274,0.17513083,0.09321005,0.00046152726,0.00058939273,0.00066428405,0.47138187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987625,0.00060783344,0.000038912156,0.00018563349,0.00030577136,0.00009942937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949999,0.0038563092,0.00016440966,0.000141613,0.00040742065,0.00043037412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016177378,0.0006655992,0.00042324315,0.0010112469,0.0046149576,0.00639518,0.0009517011,0.0038563926,0.024745705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005569698,0.00016474955,0.00032294134,0.0011983333,0.0073371315,0.0057273516,0.0027991203,0.008947565,0.004025861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017658156,0.000055849374,0.00018035657,0.00032374167,0.0000033072006,0.000054442837,0.011352081,0.000053517677,0.00023379682,0.27513042,0.6925584,0.020036338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067524625,0.000016982796,0.00056692015,0.0005269934,0.000002713205,0.000097349446,0.0061530294,0.000050632218,0.00013941925,0.028793415,0.96363705,0.000008749526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015497361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026869425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024745705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016805306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002182383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082782626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409099094","doi":"10.3138/chr-2023-0035","title":"“We Shall Go on Fighting”: The Political Activism of Kahnawà:ke Entertainers John and Louise McComber","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political activism; Politics; History; Political science; Media studies; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05042790481482009,"score_gpt":0.2708280509559572,"score_spread":0.2204001461411371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409099094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22909214,0.19534677,0.0005500595,0.10408579,0.0020746747,0.00009365093,0.00024214633,0.000038678198,0.4684761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9011832,0.062849075,0.00029870146,0.005351899,0.00019402926,0.000033465978,0.00005699311,0.000033810902,0.029998755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986613,0.0004670453,0.000038619346,0.00012980108,0.00025826436,0.00044507583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782157,0.0011283869,0.00018260824,0.00007017558,0.0005335971,0.00026363053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020444558,0.00033688903,0.00028804346,0.001535741,0.0162337,0.0063352617,0.0011215456,0.0012920013,0.0026720122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025751083,0.00027084636,0.00014501772,0.0029672,0.018369561,0.003106212,0.002081337,0.0035506545,0.00026631812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075902164,0.00005098543,0.0033822125,0.001493867,0.00002364916,0.0013060506,0.63414836,0.00008723123,0.0009802431,0.22827454,0.064015105,0.06616179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006719061,0.000016613414,0.011332926,0.0013389455,0.00003381988,0.00029506074,0.3495921,0.000044313554,0.0004854142,0.0023994092,0.63441324,0.00004142189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8460743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9418168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15392572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0371801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052497692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30966437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409199508","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i1.7770","title":"The Relevance of Moral Emotional Appeals in Environmental Political Debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Politics; Environmental ethics; Appeal to emotion; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Appeal","score_opus":0.03522881107665079,"score_gpt":0.25265459931139106,"score_spread":0.21742578823474026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409199508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7171841,0.0008879,0.017419955,0.0068600113,0.0002504302,0.00006901295,0.000050681127,0.00006986795,0.25720802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822134,0.00006253574,0.0004932532,0.00018162557,0.000048552312,0.000019974916,0.0000065965205,0.000011684691,0.00095440197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916679,0.0057860045,0.00021323758,0.00059380656,0.0012131798,0.00052586896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97335285,0.019214278,0.00355578,0.00092169724,0.002000779,0.0009545436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063452707,0.00019141853,0.00023127349,0.0016053008,0.0022991695,0.0069031813,0.00050077867,0.0020476591,0.006441025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029115846,0.00028195124,0.0004002414,0.0009093085,0.009548764,0.0053892913,0.0048968336,0.0025025238,0.0003433802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061088265,0.00046684235,0.045327958,0.0008054398,0.000093886614,0.0015466021,0.20616874,0.0016835319,0.010285171,0.6648664,0.0023591581,0.065785445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596572,0.00035212675,0.22794163,0.0007010033,0.00017123228,0.0010529234,0.17052026,0.0077775805,0.005116195,0.5251152,0.060879603,0.00021262822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006301894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000542522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069031813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021171474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007043466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033557415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411979435","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.002","title":"President’s Message: Unity, Inclusion, and Forward Momentum","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Momentum (technical analysis); Inclusion (mineral); Physics; Economics; Thermodynamics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.018944514370565373,"score_gpt":0.30748400298722967,"score_spread":0.2885394886166643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411979435","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005820623,0.0031154735,0.00004996184,0.13579452,0.85986507,0.000009572961,0.000026193155,0.00002166979,0.0010592418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009661139,0.002202021,0.00008316282,0.04792052,0.94436824,0.000021809614,0.000011841364,0.00002365493,0.0044026393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108934,0.0021736363,0.0009768152,0.0010272056,0.0039545787,0.00077840494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.955624,0.025629329,0.001775781,0.0011089152,0.010668677,0.0051933527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015557123,0.0030882396,0.0036501363,0.0034301712,0.006246312,0.014541427,0.0051268144,0.039570708,0.010424189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050361093,0.0012204377,0.0023401324,0.0020396642,0.0056110313,0.006430073,0.0022852144,0.041470185,0.004892335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019108282,0.000015372412,0.000030029227,0.00010662877,0.000015740787,0.00007524807,0.000049678718,0.000008584348,0.000023238825,0.0006698027,0.9964522,0.0025343373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000846137,0.000041799663,0.00060335716,0.001024806,0.00012060131,0.0002326687,0.00041426014,0.00022120902,0.00015396453,0.0036647045,0.9934018,0.00003619889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029533568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076809176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039570708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004762951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076713907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082274914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411985574","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v13i1.1081","title":"Review of Letters with Smokie: Blindness and More-than-Human Relations by Rod Michalko and Dan Goodley (2023)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blindness; Psychology; Optometry; Medicine","score_opus":0.04988910436581964,"score_gpt":0.2969585988453912,"score_spread":0.24706949447957158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411985574","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002135686,0.8124393,0.000045775032,0.14342968,0.041501846,0.000014342564,0.00005120521,0.000007707943,0.0022965134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056996876,0.8421373,0.00012327638,0.09526234,0.049872298,0.00006432747,0.00009517488,0.000036099445,0.006709431],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955369,0.002050167,0.0005261675,0.00035087919,0.0012624864,0.00027338113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95329285,0.028197063,0.0019427696,0.00060945336,0.014393995,0.0015637436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007951795,0.0007137848,0.001574562,0.0043546413,0.0026748728,0.0045048012,0.0016782569,0.0058349743,0.009238742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039199952,0.0006471306,0.0006366734,0.004599654,0.0036620016,0.004663354,0.0018042121,0.0058683925,0.0035342805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024064557,0.000007885842,0.00009188002,0.0028102756,0.000019213603,0.00013986148,0.0010812044,0.000015002193,0.00004052168,0.002322442,0.95394915,0.039498508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000968329,0.00001673547,0.0007291154,0.006997265,0.000018820825,0.0003748532,0.0012587259,0.000007222811,0.000022493872,0.00041707695,0.9901328,0.000015289015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028231319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045710843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028231319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066119344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011730059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056133986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412265718","doi":"","title":"Bourdieu og nyere fransk retssociologi","year":2013,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.08772676797233575,"score_gpt":0.272993674899331,"score_spread":0.18526690692699527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412265718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090313725,0.07854446,0.01390852,0.053884152,0.01221738,0.00012430403,0.0019511881,0.0007599803,0.7482962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6931611,0.017228182,0.00949597,0.0023455406,0.0016073511,0.00013273268,0.0010575295,0.0011352076,0.27383646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882494,0.005426264,0.0006218646,0.0017174573,0.0026916752,0.0012932448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961075,0.0019391621,0.00042654408,0.0004381113,0.0006079815,0.00048072895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075725485,0.0016837176,0.0015916327,0.0035982085,0.0076947445,0.022625392,0.0015423372,0.005124767,0.031416286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009713163,0.0010564135,0.00067648117,0.0020612068,0.009866333,0.008104406,0.0067254067,0.0087231565,0.010392011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003058136,0.00018937091,0.0030000946,0.0011104883,0.000074006326,0.0010928933,0.07884453,0.0007110487,0.0027401857,0.73257023,0.057441678,0.12191973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026649592,0.00004156758,0.0017504621,0.00081793254,0.000026760275,0.00057075336,0.015698127,0.0001510835,0.0012648028,0.03581661,0.9437765,0.00005870399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012521758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013417508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031416286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089336345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007815145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10509801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412276141","doi":"","title":"Pipeline negotiations as a challenging setting for organised cultural encounters:An Analysis of Mackenzie Gas Project Public Hearings from Berger Inquiry to Nowadays","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Gas pipeline; Pipeline (software); Political science; Engineering; Petroleum engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.24801587797584973,"score_gpt":0.35296525767735143,"score_spread":0.1049493797015017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412276141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93008345,0.0006740123,0.0017814564,0.0042654765,0.00009430251,0.0002483131,0.00018952791,0.000044849872,0.062618576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99106103,0.0003759708,0.0005269725,0.00043031824,0.000033048294,0.00014372732,0.000068249276,0.000051402272,0.007309294],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858979,0.0070334533,0.00031951524,0.0009029578,0.0023000566,0.0035461476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812502,0.013246283,0.0015079849,0.0006701171,0.0013557047,0.0019695782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009820958,0.00057949265,0.0006114749,0.0044025807,0.030598551,0.012565373,0.0035357587,0.004873861,0.0085543385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02550033,0.0008111557,0.00043260408,0.005095405,0.023136789,0.0063934075,0.013334894,0.0048357346,0.000596619],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002056421,0.00002316042,0.0010973731,0.00007898479,0.0000034669818,0.0014415379,0.98628145,0.000051750994,0.00021772074,0.0067362087,0.00092222396,0.0031255286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011345461,0.0000065299882,0.0016688227,0.000059460166,0.0000014564775,0.000100427926,0.98579085,0.000028404309,0.00005959596,0.0003052141,0.011969046,0.000009020619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12372464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23967348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87627536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016404163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015236926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24600899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412593746","doi":"10.1080/09581596.2025.2532633","title":"Risky subjectivities and ‘risk’ as governance among key and priority populations in Canada: a foucauldian discourse analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Public Health","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Discourse analysis; Corporate governance; Key (lock); Governmentality; Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law; Economics; Ideology; Linguistics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06670388166183835,"score_gpt":0.34593920615681056,"score_spread":0.27923532449497224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412593746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.952654,0.0021884507,0.0029525734,0.0110921515,0.00006985749,0.00026639778,0.00036468907,0.000025642434,0.030386351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994902,0.0009177339,0.0014548388,0.00036327308,0.000007143829,0.000073485215,0.00007703359,0.000019885703,0.0021846707],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945938,0.0023198451,0.00022322872,0.0005300213,0.0011286706,0.0012045056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840551,0.010722037,0.00081181596,0.00031606792,0.0029953793,0.0010996938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011560161,0.0009357517,0.0008149364,0.0053578783,0.031709224,0.016184745,0.0029331872,0.0022072974,0.0021436063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014496684,0.00049448205,0.0005253422,0.008882968,0.027390152,0.004511619,0.0064451797,0.0037937004,0.0001248594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017621416,0.000013176476,0.0033691917,0.0000692625,0.0000037935988,0.0002602838,0.97560376,0.00010717668,0.00027086097,0.016037716,0.00049975247,0.003747402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034981763,0.0000065183362,0.003887593,0.00020619587,0.000012106201,0.000056231533,0.9782613,0.00051521126,0.0002768196,0.0018459682,0.014905133,0.000023439025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98469573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20602031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1946805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9209039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413014480","doi":"10.21810/aer.v1i1.5359","title":"Listening as a Guest through Artistic Inquiries: Winter Walking","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acoustic Ecology Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"US-UK Fulbright Commission; University of Alberta; Fulbright Canada","keywords":"Active listening; Visual arts; Art; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.07907195859705089,"score_gpt":0.33146500395194495,"score_spread":0.25239304535489404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413014480","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028800458,0.8526756,0.0014524215,0.030450722,0.008414225,0.00007929487,0.00007099851,0.000060395163,0.07799591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2069285,0.7473507,0.0023179478,0.0115193315,0.0056636855,0.00018081271,0.00017549403,0.00010999472,0.025753455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744105,0.0017649393,0.0001237666,0.00013093831,0.0003290461,0.00021024817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955224,0.0034262077,0.00024673788,0.00013475888,0.00026136753,0.0004086018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062651867,0.00034197234,0.0005686656,0.0015254356,0.0023625698,0.0047513335,0.0011836563,0.0020113795,0.0045955908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008148036,0.00019480589,0.00037032922,0.0021184424,0.005772248,0.0038969913,0.004364008,0.0025811729,0.00089947815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021104062,0.00018468163,0.00085880473,0.010426778,0.0000747337,0.0011157427,0.102248706,0.000099935816,0.0017186155,0.03699439,0.08633048,0.7597362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024445511,0.000101499274,0.0031160153,0.009291363,0.000037817274,0.0012389423,0.037756935,0.000028659177,0.0005062752,0.004144944,0.9437237,0.000029329774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023844538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008259942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062651867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011543356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027790123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033133924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413307775","doi":"10.1002/casp.70163","title":"The Internet Research Agency Campaign to Influence the 2016 <scp>US</scp> Presidential Elections: A Rhetorical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Massey University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Agency (philosophy); Presidential system; Presidential campaign; The Internet; Political science; Advertising; Public relations; Public administration; Media studies; Business; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law; Politics; Art; Social science; Literature","score_opus":0.10756897527562781,"score_gpt":0.4221323064517065,"score_spread":0.3145633311760787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413307775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84697706,0.0018879633,0.0055025294,0.003225187,0.00027976147,0.00016492944,0.0010128845,0.00009201285,0.14085771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992272,0.0006868794,0.0022081314,0.00018053465,0.00011506296,0.000076971795,0.00029450696,0.00005641009,0.004109414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601597,0.0024763304,0.00023003583,0.0002162174,0.00088379765,0.00017777029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97493976,0.020514768,0.0018826337,0.00095453684,0.001488241,0.00022007174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005777778,0.00019778154,0.00029550825,0.005879123,0.0028579156,0.0037386261,0.00040268977,0.00065105385,0.0029968482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018386314,0.00023585928,0.00018726672,0.0036918533,0.0039422805,0.0018178835,0.0019111828,0.0009463807,0.00053962774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003226291,0.0002634915,0.061795216,0.001648766,0.00006792386,0.0021590842,0.50170165,0.0009371647,0.0068015456,0.26052696,0.013208474,0.15056705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052184885,0.0002335448,0.1939285,0.0027434435,0.0001885125,0.001281732,0.30449653,0.0039416095,0.011772659,0.024059469,0.45719773,0.00010415872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041333265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006779361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005879123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025479805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016716516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030556142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413531683","doi":"10.64628/aam.vvvtx3vhx","title":"The strategic management of political photos in the Canadian election","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.057486918737724844,"score_gpt":0.255417463031272,"score_spread":0.19793054429354714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413531683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51830703,0.0005148738,0.0010058956,0.011003419,0.0002902337,0.00009334509,0.00020588993,0.000060162565,0.46851915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985849,0.00009139131,0.00019960213,0.0001978921,0.000027119817,0.000006401079,0.000033545464,0.000017040591,0.013577929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996536,0.000967221,0.000045795878,0.0001889153,0.0012107975,0.0010513793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166685,0.0029857182,0.00077651715,0.00035367615,0.0027730921,0.0014441179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029393784,0.00028581452,0.00021899641,0.0016818285,0.011511437,0.009524685,0.0008827792,0.0014473124,0.0126331905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019734988,0.00021337201,0.00016296048,0.0019171668,0.0035682959,0.0016713359,0.0016106992,0.0018081194,0.00089808134],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018926578,0.00051120867,0.11040869,0.00040289725,0.00009636707,0.0012494342,0.13550146,0.0035592285,0.008338245,0.34952608,0.10937141,0.27914232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009500925,0.00024228006,0.26516283,0.000274823,0.00012545637,0.00019483741,0.28478035,0.0058527063,0.004095864,0.030559849,0.4084202,0.00019573249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7957155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91481584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20428449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029118907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03147163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4109751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413540547","doi":"10.64628/aam.eaxeh3p6e","title":"Do campaign ethics still matter in the age of Donald Trump?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.13685345126081347,"score_gpt":0.31757184321621174,"score_spread":0.18071839195539827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413540547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038650115,0.005514174,0.00060238206,0.936329,0.002485721,0.0000043852488,0.000014796037,0.000013306271,0.051171295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44819367,0.0067008147,0.001212366,0.48605353,0.009033151,0.00007263472,0.000026466822,0.00021934182,0.048488032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98580045,0.009071256,0.00025396267,0.0010322687,0.0022400247,0.0016020731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9301796,0.055723853,0.0024209335,0.00157291,0.0062317336,0.003870951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022988206,0.00040831938,0.0007495683,0.001700355,0.012490035,0.016073497,0.0012256532,0.016871382,0.0099019995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082623586,0.0004075595,0.00028518142,0.001304188,0.0282804,0.021403253,0.003701384,0.021607349,0.0022083898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042499698,0.00002986169,0.0005884918,0.00006531724,0.00000990466,0.00007404067,0.011927419,0.000037788333,0.000083793355,0.8350818,0.13427836,0.017780691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003331443,0.000019973499,0.0007261134,0.0005201929,0.000018371098,0.000074177085,0.015059435,0.00013411154,0.0003095051,0.42272556,0.5603391,0.000040174527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097966995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015715912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022988206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073921075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009186681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1215747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413601410","doi":"10.64628/aam.xsy5magra","title":"The news about Toronto Mayor John Tory’s affair destroyed his carefully cultivated public image","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Image (mathematics); Media studies; Art history; Political science; History; Art; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.09644051702144663,"score_gpt":0.28927285737117925,"score_spread":0.19283234034973262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413601410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032230556,0.0050003123,0.00097628747,0.28659475,0.009546583,0.000022772747,0.0006616884,0.00014597419,0.66482115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37558058,0.002064701,0.00039111267,0.020190326,0.0022682522,0.000013328556,0.00020333847,0.0003466084,0.59894174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986072,0.0002594041,0.00002366064,0.00014767451,0.0005914071,0.00037068976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720263,0.0014038623,0.00018053525,0.00022038091,0.00053482206,0.0004577111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014329158,0.0005275739,0.00033525517,0.00086568156,0.015179102,0.012507055,0.0006165924,0.007545577,0.0277854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008282969,0.00037556837,0.0002517099,0.0012405904,0.0074179205,0.0033074361,0.0021364528,0.009914779,0.0031561896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008224122,0.000008924522,0.0008544474,0.000058596164,0.000019283385,0.00065796677,0.021134986,0.00013422802,0.00048919284,0.27391398,0.69637394,0.0062721986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009317585,0.000008497927,0.0020345189,0.00009974658,0.000013191819,0.00012626997,0.011584544,0.00016937428,0.00085524743,0.0064073615,0.9786623,0.00002960134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43714043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6664452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56285954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022552315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006481446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.869192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413988250","doi":"10.1111/jola.70019","title":"A translated utopia: Embodied communication, media ideologies, and <i>Star Trek</i> 's Universal Translator","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Embodied cognition; Ideology; Sociology; Star trek; Star (game theory); Art; Media studies; Philosophy; Art history; Epistemology; Physics; Political science; Politics; Astrophysics; Law","score_opus":0.027474948153162766,"score_gpt":0.2836464914385698,"score_spread":0.25617154328540703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413988250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23165931,0.004967785,0.031417686,0.032621905,0.0016111701,0.00006367004,0.000064620974,0.00021572766,0.6973781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843374,0.0004190107,0.0019680972,0.0007918878,0.0001289569,0.000022066828,0.000014656869,0.0000731687,0.0122448085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497247,0.003637301,0.00018545713,0.00038732012,0.0005584023,0.00025896914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956767,0.0027386744,0.00036232927,0.0004968607,0.00046880057,0.00025657818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005389225,0.0003780554,0.00033950128,0.0012578664,0.0057604103,0.010790552,0.0006647466,0.00195235,0.004134459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006800069,0.00020706827,0.00031446855,0.0006852588,0.034613978,0.0073053953,0.005429237,0.0041038073,0.00053683895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639894,0.000015522754,0.00020128676,0.00006506269,0.0000033152223,0.0002702046,0.1630451,0.000100113764,0.00055179273,0.82773703,0.0019007914,0.006063504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006197326,0.00025505468,0.00097424997,0.0007701279,0.000032631684,0.001771344,0.22176255,0.0023916967,0.0049111154,0.3791744,0.38782552,0.00006921943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010115972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007728162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010790552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028785316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015588009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028501332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414112182","doi":"10.22329/il.v45i3.10209","title":"Sound Tactics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Ethos; Appeal; Sound (geography); Rhetoric; Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.0687244502704354,"score_gpt":0.28511190596203584,"score_spread":0.21638745569160045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414112182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00791531,0.0018730676,0.14467914,0.0040498567,0.0014120676,0.00046580142,0.00041101757,0.0013097761,0.837884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.380834,0.0026039667,0.12670654,0.003967263,0.00087060395,0.0007094389,0.0009702185,0.001798789,0.4815392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991975,0.0023514584,0.000679171,0.0014200564,0.002759808,0.00081460504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99142075,0.003944276,0.0005540077,0.001859216,0.0017678746,0.00045384633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050447844,0.0014324541,0.0008493367,0.0032597077,0.0031015761,0.007520067,0.0022275331,0.0039634653,0.06647277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017616747,0.0006674274,0.0012641732,0.0018991305,0.0051234644,0.008952065,0.0064690495,0.003661864,0.023998681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008032505,0.000051102183,0.00041475001,0.00026726624,0.000030549858,0.00030166842,0.0027229234,0.00026601437,0.0016920412,0.90533954,0.01892523,0.069908634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005020983,0.00010860321,0.00036365085,0.00042453263,0.000068879766,0.0006979942,0.0019731694,0.0018397592,0.003519246,0.3847052,0.6062045,0.00004432752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008826753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013935972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06647277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021787186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018931807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22237355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414335050","doi":"10.29173/spectrum313","title":"Framing Fear: Loss Aversion and Availability in Trump’s Immigration Rhetoric","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Immigration; Rhetoric; Framing effect; Loss aversion; Perception; Salience (neuroscience); Empirical research; Emotive","score_opus":0.015409403561365213,"score_gpt":0.2397489781160227,"score_spread":0.22433957455465747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414335050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5580977,0.0037546756,0.033074677,0.08671054,0.0013258485,0.00006577571,0.00005294817,0.000073785806,0.31684408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937261,0.00033607025,0.001421201,0.0021241617,0.00015730594,0.00001802561,0.0000070115025,0.000022567045,0.0021876257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315554,0.005185813,0.00013566672,0.00033385545,0.00086186704,0.00032715435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711258,0.025208656,0.0015987771,0.00079404446,0.0009399882,0.0003327203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010630627,0.00043889158,0.00027638365,0.0019098915,0.004802664,0.005348918,0.00073508336,0.0020291544,0.002297761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021753527,0.000284525,0.0002474024,0.00072220707,0.019054519,0.0074574277,0.0043227524,0.0044867955,0.00022795526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012603585,0.000042558022,0.003168555,0.00022232515,0.000014061476,0.00043716654,0.2796644,0.00021144688,0.0012450473,0.6857074,0.0047320253,0.024428975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063745174,0.00020626413,0.006786733,0.0018395731,0.0000727269,0.0012657364,0.29496673,0.0027207022,0.0043214327,0.3787866,0.30886438,0.00010542992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013884605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019965977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010630627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029496513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010355222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05622077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414909183","doi":"10.1017/9781009552356.005","title":"A Figure of Speech","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Meaning (existential); Figure of speech; Metaphor; Paraphrase","score_opus":0.04249500123667044,"score_gpt":0.20553880184156512,"score_spread":0.16304380060489468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414909183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000576587,0.001259777,0.009100451,0.0015441934,0.0025182732,0.000073470954,0.001119823,0.001615013,0.98219246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0153266275,0.0015626451,0.007396983,0.0007731915,0.0006481226,0.0000885227,0.0016213886,0.00076049246,0.9718221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946445,0.000106024236,0.000035047375,0.00014310767,0.0001982899,0.000053152417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924386,0.00017690923,0.00003911788,0.00022522513,0.00021802251,0.000096986434],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053081656,0.0009957127,0.00047720634,0.0015948708,0.0021418037,0.0064968783,0.0013257824,0.0026485352,0.43968436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002254967,0.00032564253,0.00046550788,0.0014571763,0.0013654454,0.005095233,0.0025964566,0.0015608617,0.30199677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007644119,0.000025342857,0.00012294414,0.00028278164,0.0000069021366,0.0003698008,0.0011835404,0.00022294196,0.002002278,0.28491896,0.51918316,0.191605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000226431,0.0000056103872,0.00003514426,0.000037208705,0.0000011462715,0.00009417254,0.00008794202,0.00007041927,0.00013599361,0.0030106388,0.9965167,0.0000028353993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023406493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018640627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43968436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013139747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010555474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79922223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415652222","doi":"10.1177/00219347251390924","title":"Book Review: Black Iconoclasm: Public Symbols, Racial Progress, and Post/Ferguson America AthanasopoulosC. (2024). Black Iconoclasm: Public Symbols, Racial Progress, and Post/Ferguson America. Palgrave/Macmillan. 235 pp. $129.99 (ebook). ISBN 978-3-031-66923-1, ISBN 978-3-031-66924-8 (eBook)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Black Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Racism; African american; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.03126196719300441,"score_gpt":0.2916576058115446,"score_spread":0.2603956386185402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415652222","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006147085,0.95912015,0.000078595425,0.013826351,0.013179018,0.000022331225,0.00035276968,0.000036581125,0.01332277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000914916,0.92502266,0.00017013605,0.007863189,0.00841644,0.00008136379,0.00053160294,0.000047223002,0.056952417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922824,0.00011228024,0.000082321334,0.00009065076,0.00039949114,0.00008697371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957384,0.0015371116,0.0004177071,0.000079770274,0.0018141689,0.00041289482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012165067,0.0014612372,0.002386954,0.0044000526,0.0011018136,0.0035600304,0.0021662826,0.003446191,0.08325647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050276625,0.00068007194,0.00064632867,0.00787746,0.001205693,0.0037920987,0.0016985775,0.0035970188,0.04857034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013084976,0.000005684361,0.00002518078,0.0014010298,0.000006759667,0.00001334117,0.000037792397,0.000014015496,0.000023084032,0.00046797137,0.9446069,0.0533851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009655801,0.000011478834,0.0003285434,0.004550515,0.000017788703,0.00010208751,0.00008008884,0.0000089417545,0.000026425838,0.0003880215,0.99446785,0.000008577357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015871646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035177685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08325647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002694842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061313007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27852064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416947720","doi":"10.4324/9781003572671-15","title":"Citizenship in the “Homeland”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Polity; Citizenship; Politics; Homeland; Foreign policy; Nationalism; Democracy","score_opus":0.10335800110958494,"score_gpt":0.2518001449420206,"score_spread":0.14844214383243565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416947720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25253534,0.003994612,0.0006200712,0.06728818,0.0007775492,0.000016139382,0.00006623731,0.000058184916,0.67464364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96393293,0.0008405987,0.00013495602,0.004657351,0.00011082446,0.000009873824,0.000032524185,0.000021556543,0.03025958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826306,0.0009844739,0.000022749737,0.00015411316,0.00014262818,0.00043298033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931264,0.0001378161,0.00006726344,0.000048559476,0.00007632443,0.00035733366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010314785,0.00012008837,0.00017982916,0.00057960453,0.010192238,0.006264622,0.0003613342,0.0012628543,0.008798125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012632639,0.00011193452,0.0001324508,0.00058047526,0.013949086,0.003931467,0.004734,0.0023180048,0.00066325127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021993816,0.000049935134,0.008667513,0.000037358834,0.0000068386375,0.0007998956,0.25591382,0.00006266136,0.00016974227,0.6368434,0.06550352,0.03192333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006855532,0.00003421218,0.005964801,0.00020213668,0.0000043141126,0.00031138235,0.21202411,0.00008819773,0.00014009413,0.029482901,0.7517259,0.000015022046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021337524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03457385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021337524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028814236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002426937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042426646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417036718","doi":"10.1108/978-1-61735-528-820251004","title":"“We Were Allowed to Disagree, Because We Couldn’T Agree on Anything”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Work (physics); Term (time); Set (abstract data type); Limit (mathematics)","score_opus":0.13362781664048798,"score_gpt":0.26211207526098235,"score_spread":0.12848425862049437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417036718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037552295,0.003640587,0.023615066,0.09821464,0.007928401,0.00010299489,0.000091481845,0.0001546539,0.86249703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26620823,0.0029261431,0.015753077,0.08996846,0.0029754436,0.00051332836,0.000224665,0.0006878237,0.62074286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855627,0.009976904,0.0003329071,0.0008931433,0.002595563,0.0006386917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935616,0.0035728188,0.0003250426,0.0006278609,0.0014505556,0.00046216795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009417299,0.0007624748,0.00064576865,0.0010525429,0.008148799,0.0079267,0.0015749645,0.005070969,0.013039016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020457687,0.0007182327,0.00054539175,0.00084210734,0.026528383,0.015289201,0.0047318307,0.016974526,0.010381419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015450658,0.000015470268,0.0001284514,0.00007808883,0.000010541137,0.00008094887,0.021870244,0.000047861653,0.00030359445,0.8074241,0.15599228,0.014032919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001439104,0.000013393244,0.00012896878,0.00028130633,0.000008749777,0.00023600047,0.010999366,0.00016388671,0.0003696692,0.20568904,0.7820646,0.00003070727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023955638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036174825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013039016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030032534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003600745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04980403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417194308","doi":"10.7202/1120224ar","title":"A New Type of Womanhood: Discursive Politics and Social Change in Antebellum AmericaIn Black and White: An Interpretation of the South","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Social change; Field (mathematics); Social constructionism","score_opus":0.1192091141928266,"score_gpt":0.3748444277504375,"score_spread":0.25563531355761093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417194308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30031988,0.010147211,0.0051710373,0.16544199,0.0007998106,0.00005593512,0.000059825285,0.000028244456,0.5179759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98200536,0.001132508,0.00065392844,0.003120809,0.00014429008,0.000045475128,0.00001073364,0.00002971464,0.012857032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976209,0.0016680567,0.00003470572,0.00015049019,0.00023034167,0.0002954728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986058,0.00075933116,0.00019991139,0.00011164926,0.00016746511,0.00015592115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034969023,0.00048058206,0.00037717362,0.0013587013,0.011120707,0.0059438436,0.0007162553,0.0022654869,0.0033704306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021032777,0.00017185792,0.00026132184,0.0012259796,0.03608056,0.0045701102,0.0050492794,0.004547318,0.0002182964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002163095,0.0000142330555,0.0005993549,0.000059431164,0.0000032345874,0.00020282752,0.3612531,0.000025568948,0.00052923814,0.63069403,0.0019569641,0.0046403534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027558572,0.000046462206,0.005991763,0.0004635512,0.000025068493,0.00037667438,0.520787,0.00022888665,0.0011113199,0.25884226,0.21207562,0.000023907138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009699193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020564113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011120707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043393113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037931493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031484008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5557231","doi":"10.25071/1718-4657.36721","title":"Nostalgia for Crisis: Representing Revolution in North American Popular Culture","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections conference journal","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Symbol (formal); Politics; Liberalism; Popular culture; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Iconography; Political culture; Aesthetics; Political economy; Sociology; History; Political science; Media studies; Art; Art history; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06194195028426579,"score_gpt":0.300843795119246,"score_spread":0.23890184483498023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5557231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63836414,0.0029829843,0.0019217351,0.030995712,0.00062887394,0.000048150046,0.000109861845,0.00009250342,0.32485595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926415,0.0005068671,0.000352801,0.001251334,0.0001250729,0.00003101844,0.000035137877,0.000042417974,0.005013801],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939073,0.0045923293,0.00012404352,0.00035815666,0.00050713,0.0005111567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243003,0.004615322,0.0008307263,0.0007369484,0.00087394856,0.00051307696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005174342,0.00044992854,0.0003881048,0.00301278,0.02026447,0.013239077,0.0011942908,0.0022364885,0.0056028324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01003884,0.00029336527,0.00020762044,0.0037867038,0.023192225,0.009667294,0.0072601545,0.004596876,0.00045506726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030370784,0.000018033537,0.0015119101,0.000035105288,0.0000036343085,0.00015199764,0.95681244,0.000018131486,0.00022486066,0.031614985,0.003358104,0.0062203747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007558904,0.000024417293,0.004605758,0.00014656609,0.000011693243,0.00012633811,0.8930574,0.00018655615,0.00030701462,0.008657033,0.092850275,0.000019278275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024690136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04316608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97530985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009116566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00251205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0661456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W596801636","doi":"","title":"Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion by Randal Marlin (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.021572866245459982,"score_gpt":0.22039543233470557,"score_spread":0.1988225660892456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W596801636","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011891818,0.9765568,0.00006196435,0.02114328,0.00082584197,0.000004002957,0.0000047642316,0.0000016030019,0.0012829178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009153196,0.97511226,0.00022117964,0.010292639,0.0035157,0.000038955353,0.000011388527,0.0000070014694,0.0016477096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939621,0.0043529808,0.00021805406,0.00028066707,0.0010233589,0.00016281016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970523,0.024997314,0.0013496142,0.00028998096,0.0024336558,0.00040642938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008432794,0.0006764186,0.0015129938,0.003869731,0.0015839618,0.004713779,0.0010729076,0.005244993,0.0029081882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030486384,0.0006496617,0.00037446333,0.0045044203,0.006840213,0.004897317,0.0017383313,0.0034085182,0.00082274695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022724645,0.000057774298,0.00077364506,0.02536704,0.00023946917,0.0002533109,0.0046866233,0.00043322067,0.00017628612,0.086835556,0.5309542,0.34999564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009113853,0.00006986527,0.0020417958,0.026255421,0.00018824538,0.00062011473,0.0013560411,0.00009063944,0.00016001458,0.01916539,0.9499169,0.00004441102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016236922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025627544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016236922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003830478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009296793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044597387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W608576347","doi":"","title":"Memoir of Mary L. Ware : Wife of Henry Ware, Jr","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Memoir; Art; Art history; Ancient history; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.013210488589082534,"score_gpt":0.1842087602288072,"score_spread":0.17099827163972467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W608576347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003459871,0.09612547,0.0012064107,0.19541372,0.06614193,0.000042302174,0.0003180185,0.000114445065,0.6371779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019720629,0.018686596,0.0003365331,0.024073152,0.009200553,0.000036446196,0.000069364,0.00016769153,0.927709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995141,0.00018567914,0.000016619306,0.000067339846,0.00017154425,0.000044712877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993026,0.00034891392,0.000049420018,0.000037146914,0.00017037462,0.000091539056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008629938,0.0006309577,0.00030302684,0.0006571809,0.004544407,0.0039897175,0.00052735175,0.0011605772,0.01623383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023792745,0.0003151087,0.00022199156,0.00049853564,0.0023081682,0.0029269434,0.0012874955,0.0037196972,0.0066506863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008230734,0.0000067323076,0.000049999475,0.00006990102,0.0000015100118,0.00013944856,0.005798799,0.000013450697,0.00016202612,0.016555967,0.96770257,0.009491419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.368689e-7,0.0000019115434,0.00006730401,0.000060192717,5.339003e-7,0.00010664516,0.0011787877,0.0000030216831,0.000034868877,0.00027201127,0.9982728,0.0000014923606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077790343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01714633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01623383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019311447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001526872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05430758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623465455","doi":"","title":"The Routledge reader in rhetorical criticism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Routledge eBooks","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Criticism; Rhetorical criticism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Art; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Theology","score_opus":0.0731445170430243,"score_gpt":0.2613722345467396,"score_spread":0.18822771750371528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623465455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007560258,0.15389827,0.006479549,0.16701406,0.013702673,0.00009015673,0.00052467955,0.00078336964,0.6567512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066103645,0.14438415,0.009455092,0.057889298,0.013790929,0.0011550147,0.0010904722,0.0024010863,0.7037303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930742,0.0038514768,0.000423815,0.0006958962,0.0015131902,0.00044145863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98265094,0.011774027,0.0010473215,0.0023870422,0.0015357931,0.0006048358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005820216,0.0014541051,0.0013961125,0.0029447735,0.0058243154,0.018747022,0.0026744301,0.009910258,0.069884166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024167065,0.00082713086,0.0006985974,0.009742924,0.016249394,0.016914025,0.005830329,0.00934171,0.039950114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014995462,0.000018043598,0.00009483057,0.00058766437,0.000007479587,0.0001591532,0.010458223,0.00009320191,0.0000944278,0.4086025,0.52490777,0.054961715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031093944,0.0000031904829,0.000056816145,0.00076588214,0.0000016744707,0.00005336869,0.0020413494,0.000043307704,0.000032151,0.0519007,0.9450933,0.0000052239775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065567414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069512897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069884166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077550155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012305143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23378581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651451328","doi":"","title":"The Changing Tradition: Women in the History of Rhetoric ed. by Christine Mason Sutherland, Rebecca Sutcliffe (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; History; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019345622839421338,"score_gpt":0.19753457088922796,"score_spread":0.17818894804980662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651451328","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009732264,0.9906516,0.000022248381,0.007763942,0.0005221929,9.726631e-7,0.0000045967117,0.0000016897362,0.0009353939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040861317,0.98911905,0.00006700057,0.0028854208,0.0016012277,0.000008502681,0.000012265668,0.0000059284,0.002214522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980938,0.0010062446,0.000098716366,0.00015464172,0.0004900431,0.0001564637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952165,0.0033603532,0.00037182117,0.00009630139,0.000614056,0.00034103845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031250967,0.0009090356,0.0016952737,0.00494095,0.002934571,0.007339758,0.0012785079,0.0036298798,0.0064423983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059793717,0.0006995158,0.0004131857,0.008910192,0.010285981,0.009100328,0.0028825046,0.0035250613,0.0023691054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010034891,0.00003400487,0.00070343877,0.008851763,0.00007126615,0.00040182922,0.018042522,0.0001640544,0.0002180033,0.0449764,0.5529304,0.37350592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014015928,0.000023762947,0.0017552422,0.009364247,0.000028019575,0.0005073116,0.0056689535,0.000022582162,0.000057724556,0.008332528,0.97420573,0.000019805402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031103171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08450303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031103171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057784356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008025949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06184423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6923315243","doi":"10.14288/1.0007903","title":"Astronaut, owned by Peter Haan of Vancouver, on the Fraser River","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Government (linguistics); Natural (archaeology); Ectotherm","score_opus":0.040482201148005645,"score_gpt":0.23460359452136145,"score_spread":0.19412139337335582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6923315243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021558856,0.0030862396,0.00048046635,0.0012513272,0.0004173098,0.00003490961,0.0017365984,0.00065783854,0.9901794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020899314,0.00045580696,0.000098571974,0.000029502495,0.00001245586,0.0000039804067,0.00022568795,0.00009002247,0.99699414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996835,0.000021397216,0.0000067412275,0.000070914866,0.00014376259,0.0000736629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990466,0.00007850764,0.00002589806,0.0000668551,0.0004415838,0.0003405975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038822056,0.00074395986,0.0005010114,0.0022677009,0.006789855,0.006631519,0.00063873257,0.0011746924,0.38326046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010410879,0.00033301613,0.00018872366,0.0035516063,0.00080912455,0.0016133853,0.0014428865,0.0010877785,0.12978561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044348486,0.000023187613,0.0006748573,0.00009920171,0.0000032051362,0.000107473556,0.00047705043,0.00010470177,0.0003523986,0.007863713,0.85360956,0.13664037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020841865,0.0000034931497,0.0011471143,0.00003839258,0.0000012752059,0.000030387542,0.00045827802,0.00004324414,0.00013827808,0.00036886765,0.9977653,0.00000326406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23040411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6623549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76959586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003982514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054690335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8797041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6948993915","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11924003","title":"lettre de recommandation master pdf","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); State of exception; Study guide","score_opus":0.06545497158508663,"score_gpt":0.24887425885685685,"score_spread":0.1834192872717702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6948993915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036486407,0.000632708,0.0012041623,0.007876109,0.022332473,0.0010906187,0.004124093,0.0048501603,0.95752484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009850893,0.00028219473,0.00044584993,0.0027350015,0.0027996225,0.0003331232,0.0015134938,0.0011974173,0.9897083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951763,0.0004750899,0.00026913817,0.00046269683,0.003042049,0.00057472667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815144,0.0022493002,0.0005122634,0.0018834212,0.011848855,0.001991826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00319818,0.0011585673,0.0011785985,0.0024144975,0.0033274575,0.009532525,0.002703843,0.007109382,0.88188165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025923254,0.00091679615,0.0013737411,0.0016030547,0.0010935445,0.0063781654,0.0031036718,0.0056568286,0.854186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012914926,0.000024607054,0.000024692907,0.000055773304,7.6985356e-7,0.000024707511,0.000012539226,0.00001356618,0.00008990901,0.00062991027,0.9876779,0.01143272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008668388,0.000015056497,0.00012339129,0.000050067047,0.0000011486381,0.000025535823,0.000023980381,0.00001924404,0.00006532608,0.0002477734,0.9994135,0.000006336408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005198573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009156903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118118346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002362617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16848147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6950437631","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4698930","title":"Genealogy of Refusal Family Tree","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Family tree; Kinship; Virtue; Narrative; Tree (set theory); Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.09794599422250307,"score_gpt":0.2548358294549403,"score_spread":0.15688983523243727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6950437631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24264695,0.0041614454,0.26828122,0.0077590374,0.00057289295,0.00027786655,0.020742903,0.0031487846,0.45240894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88996893,0.0015689703,0.050512332,0.00038765246,0.00007293367,0.00020604588,0.0073100305,0.0008283535,0.049144678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993655,0.0002837026,0.000027244008,0.0001408044,0.0001143056,0.00006851684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739134,0.001487069,0.00018017445,0.00033227005,0.0004898103,0.00011925295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087194535,0.00014653381,0.00023390754,0.0025731458,0.00207143,0.0016094714,0.00069653563,0.0006632977,0.036103893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057144514,0.00019525479,0.00014985826,0.0024282641,0.00085283443,0.0023980525,0.00086689077,0.00077659154,0.004813808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016672537,0.000041077263,0.011301059,0.00028545607,0.00001867571,0.0012565076,0.014928533,0.003534742,0.0013514541,0.7640419,0.069174655,0.13389915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032046653,0.00003187961,0.009938527,0.0003362508,0.000021667105,0.0023791525,0.0048738024,0.014806509,0.0012294494,0.4213417,0.54495686,0.000052184943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004507274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049357014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036103893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011729923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070777215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120779574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976417336","doi":"10.60692/0925b-srg14","title":"A Missense LRRK2 Variant Is a Risk Factor for Excessive Inflammatory Responses in Leprosy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"LRRK2; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Locus (genetics); SNP; Genetic association; Genome-wide association study; Missense mutation; Expression quantitative trait loci; Gene","score_opus":0.06896343354618821,"score_gpt":0.23150380895343822,"score_spread":0.16254037540725003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976417336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99844825,0.0005058786,0.00032880026,0.000058212194,0.0000063109333,0.0000140634575,0.00015325175,0.000017353603,0.00046790697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928814,0.000094043506,0.00027406862,0.000023401175,0.0000136128265,0.0000054395327,0.000110405796,0.0000043329205,0.00018649812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931455,0.00017328927,0.00008761152,0.00022775619,0.00012595815,0.00007089694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991578,0.00027595548,0.00032158295,0.000057454217,0.000058900736,0.00012827785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007222632,0.00051796663,0.00056651054,0.00095900096,0.0006148088,0.0003744744,0.00025954374,0.0007656187,0.0032623936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019029458,0.00021943786,0.00049842824,0.0010405291,0.0003578233,0.00021134743,0.00029466482,0.0004970396,0.00046674637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016203353,0.00019630088,0.9557724,0.00007811312,0.00022785399,0.0101708835,0.00022720694,0.00016841471,0.023383472,0.00009513489,0.00032649102,0.0077333245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034111305,0.00029780105,0.98161775,0.000017043223,0.000116988376,0.015867524,0.00009551101,0.0003303439,0.0010424202,0.000115639654,0.00045452756,0.0000104667215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010308926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007255728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032623936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001581389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001576586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010913789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976580218","doi":"10.60692/61pr2-9kz25","title":"The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Guideline; Process (computing); Coding (social sciences); Structuring; MEDLINE; Best practice","score_opus":0.21630796325610388,"score_gpt":0.31392200378539054,"score_spread":0.09761404052928666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976580218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51355,0.070181504,0.18831412,0.040371723,0.00316818,0.09609445,0.0076638297,0.0015834986,0.07907276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5253779,0.015100854,0.39884588,0.005027372,0.0002989149,0.047064576,0.0048512043,0.0007995435,0.002633666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.38108918,0.4430022,0.102249324,0.00836416,0.061054744,0.004240304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2029296,0.57510257,0.05088591,0.041961234,0.124195576,0.004925109],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5836181,0.0016102898,0.0029156571,0.011928744,0.0039185514,0.007825731,0.0052583376,0.00603042,0.0018372183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7607708,0.0032264583,0.0046584583,0.014516924,0.0039885826,0.00618113,0.01215398,0.005711348,0.0008982029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001667115,0.0012323724,0.07221305,0.019708317,0.0022433829,0.0012213334,0.079146594,0.004810747,0.00378514,0.008012034,0.036412112,0.7695479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003070093,0.008277248,0.21124534,0.104023695,0.0091237165,0.0043423558,0.064828165,0.018385671,0.024285786,0.01817484,0.53206736,0.002175679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007831453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012644585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4163819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010948161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026188785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51347303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976859742","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26665930","title":"Additional file 3 of Measurement properties of cervical joint position error in people with and without neck pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Position (finance); Narrative; Position paper","score_opus":0.12386934732990548,"score_gpt":0.22986465501600833,"score_spread":0.10599530768610285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976859742","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048134776,0.0005495387,0.0005214186,0.0004310821,0.00006899214,0.0017419892,0.99509335,0.000140052,0.00097221753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05278724,0.005205319,0.02720093,0.004736745,0.0004969276,0.2643171,0.61057055,0.0011623418,0.033522822],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941445,0.0016201125,0.0020474265,0.00075003423,0.0009774121,0.0004606004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8140584,0.1618096,0.011649443,0.002627523,0.009115221,0.0007398162],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012750799,0.0017359798,0.0032091145,0.009385835,0.0012335394,0.0027227183,0.0023193792,0.0020565866,0.79700005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16279213,0.0011005297,0.004468688,0.01242303,0.00070435397,0.0049532074,0.0023688741,0.0013241374,0.027599614],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017658857,0.000095421914,0.0038150065,0.5376496,0.0016313856,0.00020546126,0.0009604847,0.000908416,0.00025892074,0.0042756535,0.43069026,0.017743502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029116401,0.0008744257,0.044844177,0.3766746,0.012191103,0.00092499855,0.0036628966,0.003035083,0.0012148817,0.027375717,0.4994762,0.00060957205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009100174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01861007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79700005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034157254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008499537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28955477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980494434","doi":"","title":"The Changing Voice of the Anti-Abortion Movement: The Rise of \"Pro-Woman\" Rhetoric in Canada and the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.02372048366733005,"score_gpt":0.20720853407736808,"score_spread":0.18348805041003804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980494434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22141995,0.013256949,0.0010028927,0.35648945,0.0018168497,0.00004772712,0.00016859251,0.000058037247,0.4057396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96042174,0.0021232362,0.0002515389,0.016511664,0.0002221494,0.000018622404,0.000027471857,0.000071632545,0.020351931],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98812556,0.0034804246,0.00018331506,0.0008331911,0.0033500853,0.0040274262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834984,0.009499762,0.0007400835,0.00024314415,0.0033422422,0.0026764406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009075723,0.0003881405,0.0006690287,0.0036571522,0.061792474,0.025272425,0.0029436997,0.009265921,0.0074251145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02287419,0.00046025522,0.00033650707,0.0047255135,0.051249135,0.00476858,0.006820191,0.015498852,0.0002943896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077667035,0.000033224478,0.0024788366,0.00011469142,0.000015708536,0.00038350796,0.47235116,0.00015804444,0.00034347284,0.46532235,0.037827127,0.020894239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033933116,0.000026950936,0.008771336,0.0005804359,0.000053555108,0.0001236035,0.4364352,0.00037165932,0.0007559539,0.02529089,0.52746654,0.00008994379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97959274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15919189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15919189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21034868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97521824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982249907","doi":"","title":"How public comment on technical changes to the national model code documents is being handled","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Public policy; Exposition (narrative); Font; Source code; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.12865447528418603,"score_gpt":0.29608873819223963,"score_spread":0.1674342629080536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982249907","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032674894,0.0014438261,0.003612925,0.7575491,0.007397609,0.0000830166,0.0005931704,0.0003244539,0.196321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4747376,0.0017723065,0.0030565278,0.20912308,0.0029104033,0.00021101668,0.00069683173,0.00139736,0.3060948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94269097,0.019645266,0.0027685536,0.0035851726,0.021917373,0.009392713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81855553,0.08469587,0.00944165,0.014424536,0.067053206,0.005829154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043482106,0.00043479522,0.00057211344,0.0034301877,0.020677742,0.037011154,0.002618244,0.022742745,0.023696221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18000875,0.00094362954,0.0009987154,0.0048813852,0.012325955,0.022639992,0.007353856,0.020322705,0.007600332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091352034,0.00007414907,0.0039224075,0.000228816,0.000035305235,0.0007289251,0.07043143,0.0003404121,0.0012318932,0.33420768,0.5572865,0.031421125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029105477,0.000029168998,0.004908188,0.00041769058,0.00003820454,0.00019017528,0.062510855,0.0004806562,0.0013075563,0.019730005,0.9102098,0.00014869458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23510277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19323719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23510277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02271327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04775393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46746862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989189922","doi":"","title":"America according to Trump: an identity problem that passes through Geography","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Toponymy; Politics; Presidency; Identity (music); Globalization; Opposition (politics)","score_opus":0.07063553318865867,"score_gpt":0.31886093417368333,"score_spread":0.24822540098502466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989189922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040689792,0.0054103993,0.010049339,0.45115396,0.0029062799,0.000030020901,0.00006280896,0.00009811506,0.4895993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90855163,0.0028250962,0.003232473,0.048128948,0.0019167739,0.00009740383,0.00003704264,0.00020867398,0.03500202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265045,0.004648001,0.0001439773,0.0008204703,0.0010380108,0.00069899805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955432,0.0027303176,0.00030381014,0.00041467827,0.00060952245,0.00039851695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00595097,0.0003334641,0.00051116117,0.0015391668,0.015103168,0.010769764,0.0012676832,0.005793563,0.0046393615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009554796,0.00024305204,0.00027048768,0.002235752,0.052561697,0.015279484,0.0074226684,0.010545,0.0008087654],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003963961,0.000003785682,0.0001447345,0.000009980815,0.0000011903549,0.00005186195,0.027253043,0.000014572053,0.000017441082,0.9532963,0.015535509,0.0036676126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009667647,0.00001338666,0.0003657609,0.00019900143,0.00000489053,0.00024389826,0.06319405,0.00013874221,0.00008872026,0.4336224,0.50209683,0.000022697628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012683578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013050932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015103168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053943573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044599837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039138973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999344761","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Charlotte Jørgensen's \"Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic: The triad de-campartmentalized\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.045175884545855985,"score_gpt":0.229260827503196,"score_spread":0.18408494295734001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999344761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009939348,0.0011958602,0.00007556778,0.97767013,0.019321185,0.0000062781837,0.000031663836,0.000010553257,0.0015893253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037071572,0.0009170876,0.0001248713,0.968543,0.017575242,0.00005574097,0.0000198663,0.000055012242,0.009002085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98618954,0.005014264,0.00083424785,0.0019838465,0.004385213,0.0015929486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94789296,0.033572134,0.0024384458,0.00087769656,0.011381213,0.0038375075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011118133,0.0015458349,0.0023152044,0.0026909003,0.022765733,0.011655736,0.007295905,0.057719655,0.008435107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06544896,0.0012377977,0.0017772145,0.0032300486,0.02092422,0.010436853,0.008707115,0.0868314,0.004749708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012506013,0.0000024676697,0.000015448066,0.000037754486,0.0000036968445,0.000041975778,0.0010117735,0.0000130618555,0.000013416942,0.0048369057,0.99339867,0.0006123808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034591743,0.000008034591,0.00023440714,0.0006357855,0.000018331932,0.00010439339,0.0050576734,0.00010642962,0.000155338,0.009148922,0.9844363,0.000059794198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14165416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22100478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14165416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016391259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023444545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2816593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008524614","doi":"","title":"Caught in between: neoliberal rhetoric and middle-income families in Canada and the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Race (biology)","score_opus":0.10540231988295172,"score_gpt":0.32522933167793516,"score_spread":0.21982701179498343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008524614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366198,0.002955688,0.00008240343,0.022039803,0.00013830517,0.00002296704,0.00016570937,0.00000840365,0.03796681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937337,0.00064864015,0.000030141824,0.0010744979,0.000012608386,0.0000071911363,0.000033330278,0.000007694103,0.0044521885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596244,0.00077288825,0.00007311445,0.00021508086,0.0007158738,0.0022605583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922759,0.0021076489,0.000734853,0.00010649636,0.0018891015,0.0028861149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032681809,0.00030799082,0.0006934481,0.0035536233,0.042940736,0.0147460895,0.002157266,0.0025251315,0.007847783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103442585,0.0002908954,0.0002886912,0.005949013,0.015230524,0.0034967263,0.006058231,0.0053525595,0.00025770892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014505327,0.0001604646,0.052688792,0.00006270205,0.000025719302,0.0007304857,0.87915283,0.000091601374,0.0001265818,0.036542818,0.010369507,0.019903505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009192557,0.000011029784,0.025508102,0.00011172392,0.0000146751145,0.000052652438,0.9547438,0.000057886038,0.000062642044,0.0014050145,0.0180016,0.00002162177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99125016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09668208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09668208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14747994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70148087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023553722","doi":"","title":"The Obama phenomenon","year":2009,"lang":"da","type":"other","venue":"CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Phenomenon; Quarter (Canadian coin); Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.12528343099248093,"score_gpt":0.3593322411795206,"score_spread":0.23404881018703969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023553722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03665128,0.007116124,0.00083182077,0.015858516,0.00085064827,0.000025014368,0.00018507386,0.000060963517,0.93842065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69960016,0.004691646,0.0005892029,0.0070119943,0.00064119976,0.000095849864,0.00029051065,0.0002760559,0.28680345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762505,0.00087232614,0.000069137604,0.00047601375,0.00027317996,0.00068439177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985091,0.00045878437,0.00024270652,0.00035597925,0.00017650271,0.00025689515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017637878,0.00046365272,0.00051948876,0.0016838706,0.0120862685,0.013837369,0.0010292262,0.0030799243,0.05822747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043734265,0.00040100497,0.0005006371,0.0032527328,0.013243538,0.009804404,0.008584224,0.0050048768,0.005796481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004456554,0.000024123941,0.0018501575,0.00009731038,0.000010530761,0.00057284033,0.051727667,0.00002544276,0.0001452647,0.8844544,0.044222105,0.016825557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005032049,0.000006984643,0.0020435278,0.00022059464,0.000006423947,0.00022316641,0.022121718,0.000024703293,0.00009019498,0.017425079,0.95782167,0.000010926356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018279174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028928561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05822747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005380491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024078062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1947903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024300128","doi":"","title":"The Rise, Fall and Future of BlackBerry(TM) Capitalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Capitalism; Politics; The Internet; Presidential campaign; Persona; Presidential election","score_opus":0.019316954920512046,"score_gpt":0.19793833476008335,"score_spread":0.1786213798395713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024300128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17945844,0.013220258,0.0010393462,0.10272387,0.0007571972,0.000014309353,0.000047707348,0.000045325567,0.70269346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94997716,0.002061826,0.00022352976,0.003559617,0.00033443017,0.000014640319,0.00001056925,0.000030167974,0.04378804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989448,0.00040984625,0.000010994171,0.00012678138,0.0001392745,0.0003682527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989728,0.00050797756,0.00013270686,0.000075132484,0.0000916332,0.00021988539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016698891,0.00021857506,0.00016042645,0.0009768202,0.012182938,0.011014703,0.00046543815,0.0022344529,0.0109851705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001951969,0.0001540681,0.00013222366,0.0010080357,0.016422393,0.008393167,0.0028195423,0.0034958574,0.0008649209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031883428,0.000015052494,0.00052827265,0.000030007894,0.0000018193094,0.00017375394,0.039258547,0.000023236957,0.00017891014,0.9270308,0.01686101,0.015866825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012121227,0.000047115827,0.004484519,0.0003514353,0.0000064990613,0.00027058343,0.05699084,0.00020867932,0.0006879896,0.13820305,0.7987144,0.000022849963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009531566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015663369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99046844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006663715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00252392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048348844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027007564","doi":"","title":"The BG News September 11, 2024","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homecoming; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04627946130078042,"score_gpt":0.22868652367310807,"score_spread":0.18240706237232765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027007564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002263901,0.0027438982,0.00012321633,0.025584178,0.02244144,0.00007961228,0.008340464,0.0006867473,0.9377365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025870155,0.00044635488,0.000040577543,0.004148067,0.0007901205,0.000016438897,0.001839967,0.00012399179,0.9900075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996245,0.000025350017,0.000008598652,0.00003100616,0.00018652302,0.00012405279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.000052271018,0.000025930824,0.000025717449,0.00026752157,0.0001667447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041827423,0.0006594474,0.0004637135,0.0010282922,0.0040908214,0.004538723,0.00067347864,0.0036955539,0.278225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015325652,0.0003509647,0.000426086,0.0014511365,0.0005297854,0.0011475524,0.0011206788,0.0035439783,0.21059196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018212484,0.0000084714975,0.00007282674,0.000010334042,7.926827e-7,0.00002711898,0.000013551688,0.0000061095993,0.00003663502,0.0004699743,0.9962204,0.0031156298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008484591,0.000010544431,0.0015092386,0.000031594926,0.0000022799666,0.000013557121,0.000101212485,0.000017389852,0.00009966424,0.0002531274,0.99794847,0.0000045446277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06694333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19095072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.278225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002496982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029017543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9307554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027766428","doi":"","title":"DESIGN IN PUBLIC HEALTH CRISES: THE POWER OF EMPATHY IN VISUAL STORYTELLING A MULTI-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF COVID-19 PUBLIC HEALTH CAMPAIGNS","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Rowan Digitals Works (Rowan University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; Diafiltration; TSG101; Pretext; Proteogenomics; Fusible alloy; Dysgeusia","score_opus":0.13232909894695805,"score_gpt":0.314281176446752,"score_spread":0.18195207749979397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027766428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360683,0.00086883886,0.00988176,0.0031686095,0.000057990288,0.00019010495,0.0001555485,0.000046449208,0.04956224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949797,0.0003876838,0.00176682,0.00017691932,0.000011780777,0.00011891345,0.000054816086,0.00003394694,0.0024694793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988974,0.009711726,0.00018248288,0.00025522843,0.00035013695,0.0005263966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97014755,0.026310543,0.0014961789,0.00080767856,0.00073245127,0.0005056356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009541785,0.00044661778,0.00033311264,0.0028277496,0.005163933,0.0073947315,0.00070478267,0.0012271554,0.0049581453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022125758,0.0003736962,0.00032854322,0.0022770036,0.007877475,0.006443061,0.0055642254,0.0021650202,0.00035439376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050757055,0.000030432762,0.005725855,0.00018759465,0.000009948032,0.00038828797,0.96968013,0.00017121738,0.0006032904,0.012121896,0.0006773128,0.010353275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005658266,0.000040613675,0.006664331,0.00022389859,0.000009763451,0.00020167071,0.9717291,0.00036062917,0.00044894466,0.0019155849,0.018385815,0.000013958635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028188024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036973103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009541785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029775286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015532308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050462365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027934922","doi":"","title":"Discourses of dying in an interpretive frame: an analysis of newspaper coverage of assisted dying in the Vancouver Sun and the Globe &amp; Mail, 1991-2004, with primary reference to the cases of Sue Rodriguez and Evelyn Martens","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.038387383119445465,"score_gpt":0.2957723833080665,"score_spread":0.25738500018862104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027934922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.925356,0.0044826,0.00064044946,0.011636214,0.00021819348,0.00005570281,0.00023388238,0.000017354185,0.05735961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313724,0.001801542,0.00021902454,0.0005911971,0.000105815925,0.000031899093,0.00015249761,0.000039248833,0.0039215367],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917163,0.005683038,0.00032094607,0.0003418699,0.0011346332,0.0008031783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94418216,0.044972852,0.0038544745,0.0008444018,0.0042428547,0.001903298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008544197,0.00044366653,0.000541425,0.007298306,0.016823463,0.01567802,0.0017851213,0.0030450516,0.0030068478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03658936,0.00051202526,0.00019547572,0.010650928,0.016092135,0.0049901195,0.005787003,0.005410645,0.00037128793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001786947,0.000010977944,0.0024099515,0.00004421973,0.0000029845826,0.00028190494,0.990418,0.000014065047,0.00007266334,0.0035699087,0.00077878253,0.0023786274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022340691,0.0000066599987,0.007087846,0.000200132,0.000005754972,0.00010911736,0.9743086,0.000035098157,0.00007938799,0.00036054951,0.017798198,0.000006517432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15165436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24342974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84834564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018678935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012801174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3015433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039231383","doi":"","title":"(Mis)Believing Women: Genre Classification, Metaphor, and Consent in Contemporary Female- Identified Scholarship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Genre analysis; Action (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.10005662430401747,"score_gpt":0.27544386235888685,"score_spread":0.1753872380548694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039231383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.661042,0.0063317684,0.011117141,0.034318753,0.00080879114,0.000057788548,0.0000530722,0.000078981706,0.2861917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922603,0.00040338203,0.00050723425,0.00060771994,0.000055330125,0.00001966479,0.000007612912,0.0000250513,0.0061136996],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898525,0.007702625,0.0002174335,0.00055534975,0.001006186,0.0006659203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062294,0.0071283155,0.00079278054,0.00050526357,0.0004357911,0.00051497994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00834569,0.00045012226,0.00052757165,0.0021287824,0.008584033,0.0108212605,0.0011656765,0.0028078891,0.0022121705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016093455,0.00023448387,0.0002000537,0.0012152079,0.043107193,0.0069197547,0.0068122954,0.003189451,0.00026043886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011711895,0.0000067318774,0.00057688117,0.000035617948,0.00000169087,0.00032133117,0.85845697,0.000020064044,0.00021764668,0.13383745,0.0008700525,0.005643858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007956614,0.000036720063,0.0016834702,0.00038666048,0.00000994005,0.0011756591,0.79867405,0.0002343778,0.0009130367,0.03974577,0.15710637,0.000025936095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006745565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0085164355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006096221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031693953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044231355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065972780","doi":"","title":"Eyes and ears of the land: anti-colonial multimodal discourse analysis of coastal first nations security discourse","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Graduate Institute Geneva Institutional Repository (Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.07030686244294425,"score_gpt":0.3125622711915994,"score_spread":0.24225540874865514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065972780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6942793,0.001630004,0.004564703,0.013508088,0.00016680452,0.00004431301,0.00022346192,0.00006852842,0.28551486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956013,0.00021105155,0.00042340596,0.00017019437,0.000025999287,0.000019109653,0.000026312007,0.0000455404,0.0034770744],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996816,0.0024367596,0.00006685453,0.00015996632,0.0002606871,0.000259749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711115,0.010850179,0.0005842883,0.00049146067,0.0006884481,0.00027448556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004185055,0.00045805806,0.00032228004,0.0024615594,0.008801336,0.013100134,0.0007347458,0.0020582706,0.006443128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013379681,0.0003060589,0.00018659208,0.0028927992,0.018241126,0.009452626,0.005381463,0.0028482042,0.0003688547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035166133,0.000006491416,0.0006170757,0.000059939648,0.00000309404,0.00013647022,0.9224304,0.000051026473,0.0005758359,0.07147205,0.0009786427,0.0036337369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073891533,0.00001802954,0.0028793393,0.0003015525,0.000014966754,0.00011696726,0.9313127,0.00043661083,0.0007794122,0.015654586,0.04845987,0.00001861817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016797708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017259955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016797708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006262396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003094338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045437038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098989588","doi":"","title":"Generalized anxiety disorder and health care use","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Worry; Anxiety; Generalized anxiety disorder; Health care; Depression (economics); Anxiety disorder; Test (biology); Public health","score_opus":0.17352022445800466,"score_gpt":0.3128826570145514,"score_spread":0.13936243255654676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098989588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934549,0.0020239125,0.00004380542,0.00040968656,0.000017921117,0.000042723957,0.0012028548,0.000011947081,0.0027922573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836487,0.0005445978,0.000061033174,0.00009329133,0.000016511969,0.0000132271225,0.0005231551,0.0000010836019,0.00038210035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995116,0.00013209665,0.000045670327,0.00005738868,0.00013548663,0.0001177665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984213,0.00018495804,0.00081165374,0.00004734621,0.00014315751,0.0003915969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046364721,0.00025571734,0.00028235046,0.00089485303,0.00045141738,0.0005627466,0.00033009294,0.00028180267,0.0037586815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023052744,0.00016346003,0.00053533487,0.00090366165,0.0003472177,0.00026278093,0.0004213931,0.00065322383,0.00021161178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006193169,0.000083174724,0.99501,0.0000598631,0.00016373553,0.00008962372,0.00011803577,0.00004782713,0.0000618089,0.00004998421,0.0005434629,0.0037105174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003913445,0.000022848495,0.9996666,0.000008281421,0.00001157519,0.00006157515,0.00007348526,0.00003136893,0.0000034017369,0.0000108034,0.00010412447,0.000001944205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13873136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16949965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13873136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015121317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007252006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27584773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100491106","doi":"","title":"http://cowles.econ.yale.edu / The Demand for Information: More Heat than Light ∗","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brownian motion; Marginal utility; Value of information; Stochastic game; Sample (material); Marginal value; Geometric Brownian motion; Bayesian probability; Elasticity (physics)","score_opus":0.033259809663851045,"score_gpt":0.24731734536418976,"score_spread":0.2140575357003387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100491106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056420704,0.008413486,0.022995802,0.07088656,0.00088751817,0.00008784093,0.02916908,0.0020977985,0.8598198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2122923,0.026963405,0.022674285,0.012513166,0.0016091545,0.00051330525,0.016810918,0.0032531833,0.7033702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996401,0.00009318068,0.00001174153,0.000055762004,0.00015693791,0.000042243297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990466,0.00039036883,0.00011133896,0.0001456693,0.0001861551,0.000119839955],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008316102,0.00075367093,0.0010725044,0.0021643878,0.0011727504,0.00478765,0.0011272384,0.0032991986,0.32391238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031796321,0.0006598586,0.00043629739,0.005145849,0.0011153702,0.0052063884,0.0011795408,0.0027165895,0.07749079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030264819,0.000054201653,0.00097613136,0.00013368932,0.000020194331,0.00011647875,0.000065084176,0.0025301818,0.00012012851,0.37060764,0.56425995,0.06108604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049143768,0.000020447173,0.0023810142,0.00040509232,0.00001819541,0.0001324917,0.00021217964,0.011479943,0.0004512407,0.44359505,0.5412042,0.000051007126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022898924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02471451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32391238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004970382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015019036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96435696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108227302","doi":"10.5406/23288612.31.2.08","title":"Reading, Writing, and Queer Survival: Affects, Matterings, and Literacies Across Appalachia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Appalachian Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Reading (process); Metaphor; Literacy","score_opus":0.03423981362031986,"score_gpt":0.327061489564873,"score_spread":0.29282167594455316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108227302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8024757,0.009556813,0.0004790473,0.01017447,0.00013517408,0.000030166768,0.000044634173,0.00003163377,0.17707245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105364,0.0015643461,0.00007583931,0.00033623155,0.000028191896,0.00001911624,0.000011571212,0.000007683721,0.006903318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975789,0.0013301214,0.00006673581,0.00021980319,0.00029748306,0.0005069148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560463,0.0030252766,0.00051975745,0.00012660617,0.00029160146,0.00043219543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002115648,0.0004025188,0.00051579246,0.0025759903,0.027533457,0.014333749,0.00088193,0.0018824224,0.00513387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061176503,0.0003278108,0.00014499588,0.0025333236,0.035705842,0.008637545,0.0066321436,0.0039238892,0.0002727635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078398525,0.00001240888,0.0013945573,0.000017771712,0.0000019677843,0.00024560973,0.9734741,0.000007777351,0.000042797103,0.019360662,0.00065965636,0.004774936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034455627,0.000024423765,0.008127223,0.00013258592,0.0000074953596,0.00020810825,0.95775795,0.000023743407,0.00007760523,0.0058472683,0.027774861,0.00001521218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08029467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11759737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08029467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005427247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028808303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15965462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114772616","doi":"10.3138/cjc-2024-0102","title":"Cancel Culture, the Paradox of Commemoration, and the Need for Public Interest Relations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Harm; Indigenous; Colonialism; Public interest; Racism","score_opus":0.08430924063490829,"score_gpt":0.27013673167651725,"score_spread":0.18582749104160895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114772616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3295176,0.0051718755,0.008393286,0.2506245,0.0015358002,0.000082872604,0.00009195198,0.00018128856,0.40440077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99039817,0.00028735015,0.00032020907,0.0026904831,0.000074440795,0.000015587708,0.000008006452,0.000024841285,0.006180877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98773533,0.005976602,0.00036655174,0.00089893024,0.0030413927,0.00198113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806568,0.0115075065,0.0015763759,0.0012073412,0.003106153,0.0019458889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009616185,0.00037845797,0.00042828213,0.001375219,0.029661493,0.01547978,0.0017417222,0.005051747,0.0049576582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022356777,0.0003191905,0.00026829526,0.0014940568,0.058935035,0.007669474,0.007653236,0.006501799,0.00038937197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050148643,0.000011211894,0.0012796554,0.0001344553,0.0000077860595,0.00059354736,0.509918,0.00010163874,0.00046072557,0.46881878,0.011456482,0.007167545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015167599,0.000021585338,0.0022198001,0.00034597595,0.000020875148,0.00035501682,0.69097275,0.00038587683,0.00079653726,0.0389252,0.26588842,0.000052762098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.326032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33164486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.326032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04479697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029599823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6482686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114909605","doi":"10.14321/rpc.3.2.0073","title":"Reflecting on the Political Climate and 2024 Election Cycle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric, Politics & Culture /Rhetoric, Politics & Culture","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Politics; Queer; Immigration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.07038336628008583,"score_gpt":0.33617020296341366,"score_spread":0.2657868366833278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114909605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13129584,0.004507994,0.0009468041,0.40984464,0.022405043,0.00014548693,0.0020472785,0.00026110365,0.42854586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64769787,0.0016823432,0.0005901116,0.10094308,0.0059426646,0.00026759776,0.0014447054,0.0005303071,0.24090125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437934,0.0018105346,0.0001064432,0.00027351777,0.0010285785,0.0024016495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948035,0.00058832153,0.00032051484,0.00014095224,0.0008465728,0.0032999977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069779926,0.00046248586,0.00037626788,0.0015233641,0.0124197835,0.014518664,0.0012565558,0.0059148106,0.04928832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012650486,0.00052425417,0.00048322315,0.0017601463,0.0033443768,0.0039292383,0.0067229355,0.008420121,0.012019728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021745643,0.0001524073,0.015646437,0.00006587581,0.000021192765,0.00060774543,0.014121521,0.00025426675,0.00037711134,0.06836694,0.8672685,0.032900486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017864966,0.000057955625,0.028418873,0.00009061259,0.0000031309576,0.000079923404,0.026398167,0.00021345374,0.0001293062,0.0055840276,0.9389579,0.000048684804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035426117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107169084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04928832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00672298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050515006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16488582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117165706","doi":"10.1007/s11245-025-10343-9","title":"Judgment, Adherence, and Modification: A New Rhetorical Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Perspective (graphical); Meaning (existential); Term (time)","score_opus":0.10641015881445784,"score_gpt":0.33033109177839276,"score_spread":0.22392093296393492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117165706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08360215,0.01255673,0.16127275,0.07447751,0.0018509731,0.0001438767,0.0001921783,0.00016031147,0.6657435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97058016,0.0021951105,0.016748989,0.0018410424,0.001516992,0.0001358684,0.000061061066,0.00013853575,0.006782176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990621,0.0058001284,0.00037301163,0.0008039397,0.0017781699,0.00062372297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96142256,0.031057237,0.002099336,0.002418978,0.0022688974,0.00073294947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010264339,0.00077220553,0.0009589878,0.0048761186,0.0057799644,0.013673057,0.0025469202,0.0048467736,0.0067959772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027538342,0.00062210276,0.00069699617,0.003493106,0.047904126,0.0194821,0.004573695,0.0068273074,0.0006064019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025047226,0.000031335738,0.00037021408,0.000077216035,0.00000654312,0.00006841797,0.016188473,0.00017848771,0.00022562958,0.97428507,0.0009173147,0.007626293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035041547,0.000063392836,0.0010030844,0.0002320125,0.000032406126,0.00016685405,0.013803057,0.0018733303,0.00060212193,0.9485044,0.033651844,0.000032367054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033792034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002850975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013673057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003824353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038021833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05428368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118171257","doi":"10.14321/qed.11.3.000v","title":"<i>QED</i> 10 Years On: Founding Editors’ Farewell","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QED A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Gratitude; Section (typography); State (computer science); Rhetorical question; Dozen; Atlanta; Ephemera","score_opus":0.06386582229678119,"score_gpt":0.3007685293048278,"score_spread":0.2369027070080466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118171257","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039519116,0.016554251,0.0015024856,0.32785174,0.62393063,0.000061643215,0.00038888698,0.0007027099,0.028612342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012749757,0.01130058,0.0019552934,0.2478382,0.4565642,0.0002287132,0.0004598188,0.0020330558,0.26687035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986615,0.0026907034,0.00088985305,0.0017939348,0.0066641863,0.001346284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9134006,0.02182071,0.0037914298,0.005540735,0.042255554,0.013191042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019571483,0.0013703012,0.0015061515,0.003938468,0.0074147824,0.023336463,0.00318916,0.0055402354,0.070414506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072935894,0.0008514102,0.0010797761,0.001966709,0.008454308,0.015610905,0.006082637,0.012709227,0.038819715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001651724,0.000005587159,0.000046698206,0.000046905392,0.0000027089588,0.000031583728,0.00012658021,0.0000069411212,0.000069706315,0.004226102,0.9907352,0.0046855365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009041344,0.000007236911,0.00009438447,0.00009947097,0.0000025013055,0.000022369797,0.00019127507,0.000018819102,0.00009588424,0.0011504366,0.9982974,0.000011265856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005060858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010262469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070414506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0094476575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104354955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7123288305","doi":"10.7916/d8-wtjk-be86","title":"Roosevelt: Speech from Quebec","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Focus (optics); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.024820240169537093,"score_gpt":0.20617925471571677,"score_spread":0.18135901454617967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7123288305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28477797,0.012397267,0.0010108533,0.046426482,0.002817501,0.00010317239,0.011770407,0.0003322415,0.6403641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6343025,0.0024246508,0.0004115341,0.0028748263,0.00022427274,0.000033845463,0.0014310982,0.0002748028,0.35802245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992766,0.00018205354,0.000017412745,0.00009419823,0.00020090565,0.00022884288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998555,0.00057109114,0.00007023881,0.00005919187,0.0005545694,0.00018988586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006820139,0.00048464924,0.0003325523,0.0014485389,0.014085257,0.0048641753,0.0008707033,0.0020556278,0.04199648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031115618,0.00021199005,0.000181515,0.0030665332,0.0019081704,0.0012442588,0.0010769428,0.0025396696,0.0024842834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005165706,0.00008828215,0.015429019,0.0004841739,0.00005883647,0.006007164,0.21215272,0.00072697736,0.00473196,0.06501297,0.58452374,0.11026755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014127376,0.000020418543,0.03697984,0.00024523327,0.000018632316,0.00028083278,0.08415617,0.00036063325,0.00076048844,0.0007249196,0.87636155,0.00007725356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99307525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04199648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03502924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020487042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2541561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125364499","doi":"10.1093/psquar/qqaf136","title":"Pragmatic Vision: Obama and the Enactment of the Affordable Care Act <i>by Meena Bose</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Quarterly","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Health insurance; Health care reform; Health care","score_opus":0.006821356537021483,"score_gpt":0.2575878838175101,"score_spread":0.2507665272804886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125364499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018468952,0.009804919,0.0005963773,0.9256349,0.008055945,0.000015991664,0.00001734383,0.0000150503965,0.05401264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22182143,0.008842911,0.0017370488,0.64697766,0.011044862,0.00021307106,0.000033721873,0.00019070537,0.10913863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867873,0.009139911,0.00032730718,0.000840586,0.001470901,0.0014339667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97274303,0.0221612,0.0011310729,0.00046647905,0.0017194798,0.0017787555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016627893,0.00069555786,0.0008601189,0.0011555892,0.020097146,0.020386972,0.002055795,0.024417069,0.007332851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042867936,0.0008428266,0.00066294667,0.0010318451,0.026463311,0.014296313,0.007055295,0.041671522,0.0013403179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029401153,0.000033194563,0.00010977041,0.00008099251,0.000011998232,0.0001507476,0.013552853,0.00010858688,0.00008420701,0.6667463,0.31324556,0.0058463397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035738172,0.000025164352,0.0006122314,0.0008170924,0.000021376269,0.00009624336,0.0164107,0.0004085573,0.00030125183,0.17853668,0.80265874,0.00007627962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04735923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0736449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04735923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010030063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013347762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09416711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126985265","doi":"","title":"Lost Conversations: Pirates and Authoritative Discourse","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana Magazine of History (Indiana University)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Government (linguistics); Discourse analysis; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.028890670281975697,"score_gpt":0.22541150398277365,"score_spread":0.19652083370079795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126985265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16332322,0.0168475,0.010175841,0.1407216,0.002521711,0.00006313468,0.0001964569,0.00034287502,0.6658077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95797205,0.0019864144,0.00066715316,0.0038688702,0.0010407392,0.000051616447,0.000047275833,0.00024086556,0.03412505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061866,0.014572778,0.0005020201,0.0010203365,0.001969208,0.0013170639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94646573,0.04274509,0.002732025,0.003609122,0.0025472997,0.0019007748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017078103,0.00086602394,0.0010264829,0.0062981425,0.03094443,0.032472912,0.0025744457,0.011288463,0.015399979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053385146,0.0008350955,0.0003716897,0.0045667617,0.0486666,0.033881836,0.015495928,0.01234876,0.0020162372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004771544,0.000034833207,0.00059216475,0.00010141416,0.000008165765,0.000467265,0.44721994,0.000045727516,0.00013404018,0.52978325,0.012970109,0.008595385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038760274,0.000061966515,0.0009456604,0.0008351785,0.00003647297,0.0007894825,0.41173866,0.0007319773,0.0009502421,0.18292466,0.400897,0.000049897542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050939354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004648244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032472912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058984566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050444086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09031874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128779945","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0258","title":"The Intellectual and Cultural Origins of Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s New Rhetoric Project: Commentaries on and Translations of Seven Foundational Articles, 1933–1958","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Audience measurement; Craft","score_opus":0.08286538395446588,"score_gpt":0.29377401866135644,"score_spread":0.21090863470689056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128779945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09910377,0.071488194,0.0038883472,0.4908877,0.026262835,0.0000810984,0.00041296237,0.00018168447,0.3076934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89777267,0.008967862,0.0008352971,0.021921653,0.010337892,0.00013481353,0.0001291129,0.0005504471,0.05935042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99126476,0.0042206096,0.00022694578,0.00081474293,0.002605947,0.000866935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698192,0.022099992,0.0018489896,0.0010767955,0.004003534,0.0011515354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008532487,0.0008823911,0.00056545,0.0028129742,0.015794046,0.013156458,0.0013068196,0.006000896,0.0021401797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029358843,0.00057028065,0.00027506216,0.0029130813,0.02482047,0.006279345,0.0043564155,0.013906041,0.00074078795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011096036,0.00003559127,0.00054301973,0.00018511417,0.00002070913,0.0008394948,0.2749441,0.00012486511,0.000620279,0.39512938,0.31561625,0.011830223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018691413,0.000020143083,0.002046193,0.0007782495,0.000009713842,0.00027564476,0.039810784,0.00019196457,0.000934336,0.018634964,0.93722355,0.000055822053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023562267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0275846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023562267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015167758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00647826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11005032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128780135","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.58.2.0159","title":"Dialectic, Dialogue, and Difference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Rhetoric; Ancient Greek; Western thought","score_opus":0.0415909414146712,"score_gpt":0.24640013927792512,"score_spread":0.2048091978632539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128780135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061704896,0.049003467,0.046788998,0.09069976,0.0015266818,0.00008175827,0.00012091907,0.00010786206,0.7499658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792489,0.0035259929,0.00427798,0.0019388876,0.00042539442,0.00007371026,0.000032473352,0.00003214943,0.010444523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865568,0.011072296,0.0003022375,0.00073102844,0.0010192745,0.00031827186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878178,0.009982553,0.0005131648,0.0007853781,0.00058391877,0.0003171337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583469,0.00046829946,0.0005547106,0.0022220353,0.0050762524,0.010367368,0.000928906,0.0025027904,0.0053569837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009583194,0.00018548183,0.00029361935,0.0022007602,0.054396376,0.009916184,0.0061636968,0.0042125564,0.0005439278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008127379,0.0000054068096,0.00005824277,0.000032725307,0.0000022869583,0.000027890579,0.008939919,0.00006139174,0.000049218554,0.98730135,0.00089091173,0.0026225187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013706369,0.000011975299,0.00012761865,0.00014314981,0.0000027644103,0.000052680112,0.005688267,0.00019709267,0.00010228173,0.93536794,0.058286816,0.000005706324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012474367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005953409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010367368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054279296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002444555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0453943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133023782","doi":"","title":"Founding Speech: Aristotle&apos;s Rhetoric as Political Philosophy","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Political philosophy; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.1667040815063063,"score_gpt":0.4236027470646272,"score_spread":0.25689866555832086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133023782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023428092,0.039492514,0.055042528,0.09521981,0.0045608473,0.00006168314,0.000065675944,0.0002675558,0.7818613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853167,0.013106348,0.020004239,0.009751665,0.004242118,0.00011269419,0.00005356873,0.00029423463,0.06711849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564385,0.0025299687,0.00011747828,0.00038686764,0.0010899482,0.00023186683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576545,0.0031573188,0.00023389763,0.00026097673,0.0004087975,0.00017356503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062169163,0.00047036057,0.0005246526,0.002607342,0.0060216575,0.010592819,0.0008957129,0.003947844,0.0026097777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008021038,0.00034173604,0.0003423837,0.0016627032,0.028286956,0.009357313,0.0021283356,0.0054345825,0.0008825147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003980409,0.0000037436762,0.000039728,0.00002255692,0.0000012320094,0.000040206494,0.004481866,0.00008191134,0.000032804506,0.9875008,0.0031594655,0.004631616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012047513,0.000015977923,0.00025036378,0.00020562451,0.000006543832,0.000116438845,0.001852556,0.0008265142,0.00015872665,0.8228062,0.17373952,0.000009487013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005336263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004667916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010592819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00864262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038795369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06270683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134271038","doi":"10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.6377","title":"YOU’RE LOOKING VERY SHANE TODAY: RHETORICAL FIELD METHODS & THE MATERIALITY OF QUEER MEDIATED REPRESENTATION FOR SAPPHIC WOMEN","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Civil War Book Review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Rhetorical question; Queer theory; Narrative; Human sexuality; Materiality (auditing); Sexual identity; Identity (music)","score_opus":0.09838539171763759,"score_gpt":0.3878757993171821,"score_spread":0.2894904075995445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134271038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49026158,0.006612194,0.0958487,0.030927,0.00067328755,0.0011598178,0.00028258524,0.00024712048,0.3739878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93824184,0.0019532565,0.01728377,0.0016936084,0.00013748226,0.0009870325,0.00006102193,0.000117934214,0.039524116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98231435,0.015968125,0.00012542105,0.00042315884,0.0006731721,0.00049569807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799903,0.016449079,0.00062055344,0.0013611052,0.0010147502,0.0005642934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022803921,0.00057618297,0.00029130618,0.0036773349,0.011812904,0.008182181,0.0014162557,0.0012402589,0.010129838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013880373,0.00034111695,0.00022390088,0.0016472772,0.02881837,0.0060771047,0.0073931715,0.002326952,0.0009669809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047986487,0.000045644665,0.0013831117,0.00018473208,0.000004799012,0.0004750275,0.8006529,0.00005696852,0.0012294508,0.15995431,0.0027417939,0.03322324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001930173,0.00010028117,0.0016358888,0.0005748082,0.000012454173,0.00043548463,0.8068478,0.00034753405,0.003650271,0.03671307,0.14963178,0.000031294443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033342945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009116825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022803921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005634648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005254082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120600104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7147097469","doi":"10.1353/mwr.2025.a986729","title":"Rhetorical Canadian Graydon Carter: A Regionalist Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Middle West review","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Perspective (graphical); Rhetorical device; Rhetoric","score_opus":0.09274862711139895,"score_gpt":0.30071740969234295,"score_spread":0.207968782580944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7147097469","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005996807,0.58014846,0.0006792985,0.26479256,0.004926718,0.000018573379,0.000105574654,0.000030542673,0.14330144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30637527,0.46322632,0.0011666721,0.15631665,0.005249697,0.00007302501,0.000091001304,0.00012085656,0.06738047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970005,0.0012378086,0.000108439075,0.0002509994,0.00066249154,0.000739825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925411,0.0042495434,0.0004576534,0.00016448597,0.0020538555,0.00053338177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059702336,0.00039639114,0.0008612095,0.0040457365,0.005492514,0.010079109,0.0012446513,0.003885641,0.012790795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012247469,0.00028957165,0.0003038751,0.005455879,0.007806299,0.006074418,0.0022115442,0.005049655,0.0012168428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009408665,0.000022953654,0.0005097377,0.0024396656,0.000041571748,0.0002751788,0.015285286,0.00013001515,0.0004457168,0.5369493,0.31855533,0.12525116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014091306,0.000014925958,0.0015774375,0.004262542,0.000049288814,0.0000883551,0.008838658,0.000029538689,0.00019209289,0.012470303,0.97243947,0.000023329998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40749666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53791887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5925033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016573388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04280152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81024957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72019785","doi":"","title":"The Hero of Heroines","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic (Winnipeg)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; HERO; Visual arts; Art history; Clothing; Art; History; Sociology; Literature; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03543406585630252,"score_gpt":0.2441386267960216,"score_spread":0.2087045609397191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72019785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07077218,0.013325367,0.006407214,0.024724985,0.0010594643,0.000033457516,0.000048802285,0.000101755184,0.8835268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872061,0.0030553928,0.0009604474,0.0024636788,0.00023495688,0.00004251512,0.00002052073,0.000109427776,0.12105204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719256,0.0019407608,0.00003808516,0.00024272331,0.00028861876,0.000297367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865,0.00047639056,0.00016004557,0.00020986758,0.00018568269,0.00031806534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016259823,0.0006549584,0.00031660017,0.0007355153,0.013008815,0.00900974,0.00070787506,0.0014567254,0.0076365997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033693223,0.0002488711,0.00013729911,0.00053202186,0.03765177,0.006405372,0.0061006057,0.0029406855,0.0013263689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016023441,0.0000066730067,0.00030944313,0.00005834669,0.000002421493,0.00018998943,0.25487414,0.000030317244,0.00021715525,0.72604156,0.009309425,0.008944586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004929116,0.000023973653,0.00036299165,0.00032144695,0.0000044166786,0.00037016423,0.10643815,0.000049624512,0.0002456103,0.042556904,0.8496109,0.000010868837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01126593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017598469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013008815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056491415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036279457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04098755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72657999","doi":"10.31274/rtd-180813-16480","title":"\"A solution to a worrisome problem\": the rhetoric of scientific discourse in a public policy dispute about the environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Rhetoric; Ethos; Construct (python library); Political science; Politics; Function (biology); Sociology; Epistemology; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04318288938304206,"score_gpt":0.2803439947725639,"score_spread":0.23716110538952184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72657999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11603358,0.013220262,0.072866835,0.60365653,0.004369973,0.000148149,0.000100778845,0.00029882646,0.18930511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564739,0.0028165646,0.012570417,0.018372012,0.0023247774,0.00018070127,0.000038981125,0.0002069586,0.0070156497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95920736,0.033728775,0.0006578739,0.0014736245,0.003827221,0.0011051957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92518604,0.06362199,0.0033074801,0.0030756,0.0039495416,0.00085935055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03745709,0.000955077,0.00082680694,0.0072977883,0.020063564,0.02516407,0.003148943,0.010899176,0.002944674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057254765,0.000636267,0.00078586285,0.003963398,0.088700384,0.032336604,0.010758806,0.012557556,0.0006157626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025790725,0.000014921018,0.0005646554,0.00013554106,0.000007824106,0.00023147103,0.19178419,0.00012437545,0.00027614128,0.7932665,0.005127929,0.008440617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040123596,0.000055267374,0.0008243226,0.0013625127,0.00003488117,0.00067719107,0.2669695,0.001470989,0.0013626419,0.5447321,0.18241005,0.000060530536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038554077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033054594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008472027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00850763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19809443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W767988052","doi":"10.46743/1082-7307/2005.1055","title":"Deconstructing the “War of All Against All”: The Prevalence and Implications of War Metaphors and Other Adversarial News Schema in TIME, Newsweek, and Maclean’s","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Peace and Conflict Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Schema (genetic algorithms); Period (music); Spanish Civil War; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07582715524551188,"score_gpt":0.304198695266408,"score_spread":0.22837154002089616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W767988052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9264054,0.0038052548,0.0009626427,0.007995336,0.00014066466,0.000014347904,0.000049477494,0.000012018995,0.060614884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973488,0.00085958745,0.00013274203,0.00031170726,0.00005389443,0.0000072435896,0.000017139404,0.0000094279985,0.0012594286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970239,0.00185676,0.00009453956,0.00020149461,0.00056881475,0.0002545877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774505,0.017229797,0.0027285884,0.0006047025,0.0013599991,0.00062640244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005546376,0.00029133895,0.00025214418,0.0059245224,0.007812732,0.008849488,0.0007897493,0.0011301263,0.0015697873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013603921,0.00027218263,0.0001300462,0.004913328,0.023774084,0.00818542,0.0032121576,0.0020787062,0.00013350298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028233972,0.000013522489,0.0051436108,0.000067079505,0.000004699616,0.0002582558,0.9439254,0.000030743588,0.00042964736,0.040318556,0.00091847585,0.008861874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037071952,0.000016908953,0.013323402,0.00017450668,0.000008503264,0.00019903021,0.9316704,0.00011381256,0.00036146384,0.0039007731,0.050211802,0.000015546166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059984706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08381494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059984706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077902195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039527463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1192711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W792501183","doi":"10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_10","title":"The Emergence of “Atomodoxy” in Cold War Rhetoric and Science Fiction Narratives: Fear, Threats, and the Duties of Citizenship in an Atomic Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Citizenship; Fantasy; Subjectivity; Cold war; Aesthetics; Politics; History; Literature; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10180871047776982,"score_gpt":0.29058154791910673,"score_spread":0.1887728374413369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W792501183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09569063,0.0077150427,0.018818723,0.05793857,0.0010555522,0.00005130203,0.00006833278,0.00008872569,0.8185731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715034,0.0010816022,0.0017255914,0.0024986318,0.00031118357,0.00005229872,0.000030698364,0.000116591276,0.02268006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592435,0.0028466287,0.0000885111,0.0002726391,0.00053780957,0.0003300406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890777,0.00921194,0.00044946236,0.0005009478,0.0004836329,0.00027636092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067947735,0.0004778384,0.0004176845,0.0022600773,0.011034402,0.013076261,0.0012774566,0.0043949937,0.004162851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010511668,0.00038732323,0.0002870527,0.0017130384,0.06112152,0.014702674,0.006020102,0.008570231,0.0005518429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005638294,0.0000032471262,0.00006498571,0.000017640477,8.007027e-7,0.00003572808,0.071455695,0.00001954663,0.00006864154,0.9244441,0.0016446058,0.002239462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015645533,0.000019822068,0.00054598146,0.0003365228,0.0000070979017,0.00023272648,0.06825983,0.00040166033,0.00081247994,0.7064425,0.22290164,0.000024207304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035153849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004622479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013076261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005044543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038905093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036600947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W822259891","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1005","title":"Fundamental Assumptions in Narrative Analysis: Mapping the Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative network; Narrative criticism; Narrative inquiry; Variety (cybernetics); Openness to experience; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Representation (politics); Sociology; Object (grammar); Narrative psychology; Narrative structure; Narratology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.2659360211332156,"score_gpt":0.4564633243485719,"score_spread":0.19052730321535627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W822259891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25859338,0.020579936,0.43743643,0.033858746,0.0008526923,0.0014245822,0.0006596471,0.00035765374,0.24623697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362097,0.004398058,0.055580188,0.0004437664,0.00010746703,0.0006430477,0.00016806622,0.00012734208,0.0023224582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548564,0.036081985,0.0015259992,0.0032023967,0.0034103512,0.00092286384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89380974,0.089295976,0.004438917,0.006704426,0.004800681,0.00095031905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053484216,0.00075942517,0.0008733543,0.013732242,0.010604365,0.027289702,0.0034878813,0.0026475352,0.0042698174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09023573,0.00089830434,0.0007345284,0.010767564,0.054633856,0.037492864,0.009139221,0.0047922074,0.00057351793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056011337,0.000038243325,0.0029963702,0.0006218237,0.000020014986,0.00021382635,0.33128232,0.0004608237,0.0003101912,0.61433065,0.0012527435,0.048416913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023631548,0.00003861254,0.0022188271,0.002550071,0.00002013967,0.00035739876,0.45463562,0.0024741087,0.00067776203,0.48460877,0.052355304,0.000039725972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060102837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036184469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012362492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009932437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28285497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W832645221","doi":"10.1080/00028533.2012.11821778","title":"Dialogic Potential in the Shadow of Canada's Indian Residential School System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Argumentation and Advocacy","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Argumentation theory; Sociology; Negotiation; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Indigenous; Compromise; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Social science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01903988630529818,"score_gpt":0.23221198498196594,"score_spread":0.21317209867666775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W832645221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48885882,0.0022702108,0.0033286726,0.07308509,0.00042510347,0.000096205324,0.000108883476,0.00014668483,0.4316803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98918694,0.00016017376,0.00034989105,0.00091008306,0.00002539284,0.000012272103,0.000007887413,0.000021348966,0.009326132],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932996,0.0031630453,0.00008893592,0.00057855825,0.00085006264,0.0020198375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923913,0.004015451,0.0003549313,0.0003401305,0.0010271287,0.0018711712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056225606,0.00038953664,0.00045372426,0.0018405109,0.07915977,0.02424369,0.002787041,0.004648411,0.008155404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010262924,0.0003396416,0.00029484776,0.002331787,0.052323844,0.005314143,0.011229646,0.007414638,0.00045427328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043501786,0.000035591536,0.0017203502,0.0000652505,0.00000867593,0.001544156,0.5825626,0.0003013452,0.0003555173,0.39283973,0.009590278,0.010933016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031824715,0.000018494313,0.002475686,0.00018717287,0.000021632415,0.00023441347,0.64781785,0.0007890256,0.000533662,0.040629394,0.30719694,0.00006390333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86648405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9381675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13351595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11585009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10727069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8405552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W928890597","doi":"10.15210/interfaces.v14i2.6736","title":"Indigenous Blood Memory and Abstraction in the work of Anishinaabe Artist Rebecca Belmore","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Abstraction; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Globalization; Aesthetics; Epistemology; History; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.04434794930620478,"score_gpt":0.24762378311769626,"score_spread":0.20327583381149147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W928890597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25378338,0.02381889,0.0040157707,0.052074388,0.0018626342,0.00006528741,0.00004803517,0.000115397765,0.6642163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8806043,0.003631736,0.0016791006,0.0033728546,0.00017143297,0.000030349163,0.0000139578115,0.00011415617,0.11038211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987213,0.00055897306,0.00001737496,0.0001246523,0.0003262122,0.0002514079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998998,0.00054641906,0.000058610996,0.00007552634,0.00015308481,0.00016843183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019841092,0.00037300252,0.0003049585,0.0008673903,0.019327264,0.0048169685,0.00065287657,0.0011267848,0.00691493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025451414,0.00016740913,0.00013080721,0.0007593575,0.01663644,0.0027066052,0.0033165135,0.0034110395,0.00049746974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071725364,0.000044891865,0.00095107843,0.00013537295,0.000007138645,0.0009069933,0.69290274,0.00016011491,0.0012741714,0.20285921,0.052981112,0.047705438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005855084,0.000023335417,0.002864515,0.00040890437,0.000009206264,0.00065692485,0.19412802,0.00019355807,0.000652633,0.012495851,0.7885182,0.000043120817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13089159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34171015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86910844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007247769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00441962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26025945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94792601","doi":"10.1177/082585970402000308","title":"Dignity at the End of Our Days: Personal, Familial, and Cultural Location","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Palliative Care","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Nursing; Palliative care; End-of-life care; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09561462617604684,"score_gpt":0.3160294687276379,"score_spread":0.22041484255159105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94792601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49712902,0.012885746,0.008562726,0.06669055,0.0007636267,0.000038426322,0.000024207806,0.000060727903,0.41384494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602133,0.00069101376,0.00042093545,0.00064074656,0.000049111346,0.00000825764,0.0000028665595,0.000006765945,0.0021589538],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957189,0.0035447706,0.000079550984,0.00013475877,0.00027767083,0.0002444559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459803,0.003597385,0.00055552775,0.0002520616,0.0004129442,0.0005840883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004536586,0.00020850879,0.00028050205,0.0010753543,0.012724912,0.0052063246,0.00088667334,0.0017786539,0.0026887755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009383273,0.00015476735,0.00015875454,0.0006989604,0.021369047,0.0056387396,0.006083427,0.0019348209,0.00031462446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046928235,0.000029341378,0.0062610796,0.00014250762,0.0000102272925,0.0015562631,0.69036055,0.00009698389,0.00043142465,0.26514682,0.0034499115,0.032468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017782058,0.00012352662,0.008263001,0.000945104,0.000032056276,0.0025339022,0.7801286,0.00021304483,0.000768478,0.072982214,0.13394605,0.000046315683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047462382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008192631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012724912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032603738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026998266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023992062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W972312353","doi":"10.33972/jhs.113","title":"Irrationalism: The Foundation of Hate Propaganda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hate Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14687651204146018,"score_gpt":0.32880704290632323,"score_spread":0.18193053086486305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W972312353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12581833,0.005506848,0.18289782,0.04065994,0.001040239,0.00013568043,0.000053689906,0.00020233588,0.64368516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98847663,0.00064435654,0.005114212,0.00086215045,0.0002088916,0.000053075903,0.000011457754,0.00004189754,0.0045873174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908352,0.005763577,0.0003226757,0.00072906504,0.0016628777,0.00068665313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97046036,0.020665731,0.0026852144,0.0032176068,0.0025620928,0.00040897154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012446288,0.00046587785,0.00052891,0.0022982617,0.0047230762,0.0072182133,0.0011766674,0.002970904,0.003873911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023941012,0.00038321433,0.00048532532,0.00097492075,0.05789967,0.011374861,0.004810908,0.004983343,0.00047265342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076315,0.000006324389,0.00032760223,0.000030512785,0.000003060492,0.000070291026,0.010684083,0.000121211786,0.00009841188,0.9854263,0.0003670752,0.002857546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014029451,0.000026422009,0.0006774657,0.00025525078,0.00001030999,0.0002959953,0.0061830576,0.0011522464,0.0005663194,0.95800346,0.03279175,0.000023654513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012883475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089803006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012446288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033388108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002314462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06582302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9947094","doi":"10.1103/physrevb.38.6295","title":"Rhetoric and the Incommensurability of Values","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. B, Condensed matter","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03086569088676864,"score_gpt":0.29663552141152255,"score_spread":0.2657698305247539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9947094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11097492,0.09982416,0.050293434,0.12620349,0.0022261718,0.00008214154,0.00028358592,0.00012380465,0.60998833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702167,0.014140793,0.0051433747,0.0035209123,0.001116022,0.00009756789,0.00010210878,0.000048579044,0.0056139086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871552,0.007997612,0.0004764462,0.0008950593,0.0028769686,0.00059868523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95447797,0.03764212,0.0022492714,0.0029977374,0.0021672968,0.0004655874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013479019,0.00041697634,0.0009014996,0.0032809866,0.0027657344,0.008870966,0.0010537093,0.0038646099,0.0052711284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048514158,0.0004492705,0.00043246677,0.0022380936,0.031509943,0.013017391,0.0031934087,0.00388254,0.0007824107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014517957,0.000004432078,0.00009264519,0.000071226175,0.0000078332405,0.0000393492,0.0008467911,0.00016072221,0.00007817274,0.99109745,0.001276289,0.006310501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012304771,0.0000107814385,0.00022277376,0.00009604746,0.0000067873802,0.000054748118,0.0003074477,0.00017214015,0.0001243595,0.9864395,0.012547313,0.0000056579247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000933449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006855348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013479019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032843847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028701306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07128477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}