{"meta":{"query_hash":"8a935e58ffd2","filters":{"topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought"},"cohort_total":390,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":390,"exported":390,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8a935e58ffd2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Seventeenth-Century+Political+and+Philosophical+Thought"},"results":[{"id":"W107359594","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-2381-0_3","title":"Desgabets: Rationalist or Cartesian Empiricist?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Cartesian coordinate system; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.24895460306451306,"score_gpt":0.31857882451474806,"score_spread":0.069624221450235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107359594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049587685,0.02935938,2.766673e-7,0.0032819977,0.0018452693,0.0003120694,0.0002853578,0.00000829524,0.96485776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1339362,0.00087690743,0.000096922704,0.0020881777,0.0053834408,0.000027423559,0.000082108985,0.000064465625,0.85744435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978548,0.00008175485,0.00089292607,0.00033800426,0.0005981661,0.00023429851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982609,0.0004938762,0.0004887546,0.00045765733,0.00024581933,0.00005297348],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031338577,0.00041683647,0.0009162019,0.00021350976,0.00012881863,0.0000064037085,0.00051877805,0.00013351954,0.0035630222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007619995,0.00027413547,0.00037790762,0.000018665944,0.0037912799,0.00006860874,0.000070534545,0.00040274631,0.000033552762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116356336,0.00015301428,0.000001231504,0.00027644658,0.00024124123,0.000028573028,0.020495161,5.3034915e-7,9.041699e-7,0.94474965,0.032753263,0.001183617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019638962,0.00021186477,0.0000020004236,0.00035010764,0.00011762555,0.0000025167276,0.0002682119,2.6226857e-7,0.0000015442025,0.46796018,0.53071725,0.00017204505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020818774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008457363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49796396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003015842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012152434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108433577","doi":"","title":"Aristotle's Political Psychology: Rhetoric, Affect, and International Relations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Affect (linguistics); Politics; Rhetoric; International relations; Persuasion; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029659458411593315,"score_gpt":0.28557353308053574,"score_spread":0.25591407466894245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108433577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1499003,0.0026949588,0.0011000368,0.13564697,0.0033734122,0.00032064575,0.000028388871,0.00013218189,0.7068031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806716,0.000309673,0.000031982963,0.0014602506,0.0025646202,0.000010563891,0.000008837249,0.000016984888,0.014925479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782646,0.00007684424,0.00025490747,0.00018167813,0.00017495321,0.0014851345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994005,0.00010617782,0.000060152965,0.00010528057,0.00010327481,0.00022460392],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029289344,0.00014005665,0.00014425053,0.00009625586,0.00033933346,0.00017527414,0.00018744406,0.00007006928,0.0043781674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000781358,0.000108182096,0.000098725424,0.000027489341,0.0002565412,0.0002884015,0.0000422345,0.001333519,0.0008262523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010053349,0.000087563894,0.0005172733,0.0000015103586,0.000086747474,0.0000012212527,0.00016634226,1.18075945e-7,0.000009606152,0.9949311,0.001750572,0.0024378728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034473164,0.00013555188,0.00094920665,0.000007715394,0.000021417278,0.00018559545,0.00040737828,0.000026387796,0.0000013481972,0.8518601,0.14594385,0.000116705676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007455212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008976638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8307713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000267388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013642195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1133157046","doi":"10.71781/16163","title":"La possibilité d'un État des États chez Spinoza","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07646611809420892,"score_gpt":0.3504518750832179,"score_spread":0.27398575698900896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1133157046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52929485,0.0028640553,0.0000031657178,0.00039355387,0.0011835439,0.00056280225,0.0003578774,0.0000047072494,0.46533546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7780413,0.00062581967,0.002314322,0.00041733126,0.0029841296,0.000049344344,0.0020226464,0.00012974195,0.21341535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636996,0.00034445542,0.00094930176,0.0009027362,0.0004837647,0.00094976986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979094,0.00050828315,0.0002829242,0.0004852799,0.00026441886,0.0005496779],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008355193,0.00070408813,0.0007657809,0.00013490333,0.001242931,0.0012490033,0.0010033831,0.0006572867,0.07863646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016182187,0.0006195032,0.00042321964,0.0001263324,0.0014126088,0.0004261819,0.00022157344,0.0009378778,0.005761536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006020209,0.0017063108,0.0003227114,0.00048025206,0.00040747534,0.000337474,0.043910667,0.0000016385328,0.0001859484,0.4344209,0.0002790618,0.51734555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009963308,0.00035737906,0.00406261,0.0010738043,0.00039342674,0.000029911853,0.007796777,0.00001684946,0.0051347227,0.09277131,0.8863599,0.0010070369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087852415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8860808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014352382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017085124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1156317859","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511732300","title":"Spinoza and the Stoics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Miller; Epistemology; Scholarship; Ancient philosophy; Key (lock); Similarity (geometry); Law","score_opus":0.05162006955669357,"score_gpt":0.20432904250506495,"score_spread":0.15270897294837138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1156317859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040969044,0.0008222061,0.000004451552,0.00037516092,0.00059323205,0.00035866944,0.0005356167,0.000084198226,0.99718547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009801923,0.00011220026,0.000003945879,0.00058170315,0.0016053253,0.0000010116537,0.00006474126,0.00002854899,0.9966223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882483,0.00012749979,0.00016125094,0.00031301484,0.00029026458,0.00028311508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894404,0.0001776583,0.000113576876,0.00036423522,0.00016953067,0.00023097862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001619823,0.0002942613,0.00040807077,0.000057735862,0.00037675278,0.0001346534,0.0004112522,0.00017742743,0.000023173689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021909322,0.0002137532,0.00018701844,0.000003213742,0.0021573445,0.00006598153,0.00038854283,0.00055057433,0.00003356192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011578219,0.00000823001,6.8373666e-8,0.000047147845,0.00007964063,0.000034202985,0.00045458044,5.9402403e-8,3.8321378e-8,0.7317048,0.2673762,0.00017928446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012970072,0.000039277737,5.538517e-7,0.000076163815,0.0002741083,0.000006645501,0.00013326442,0.000018281627,0.000001364529,0.003837194,0.9940382,0.00027793707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001584708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046244963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72786754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011724195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012516037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8716603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125461056","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335828.013.015","title":"Spinoza’s Unorthodox Metaphysics of the Will","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Teleology; Epistemology; Naturalism; Philosophy; Volition (linguistics); Relation (database); Causality (physics); Computer science","score_opus":0.0449665154912884,"score_gpt":0.19524217991587384,"score_spread":0.15027566442458545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125461056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018957788,0.00009991883,0.0000074016775,0.00013151311,0.0006551856,0.0004026479,0.0005416702,0.000051863924,0.9979202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002898153,0.0000666784,0.000020994914,0.00020739221,0.0007504414,0.0000011538223,0.000037664675,0.000032983346,0.99598455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987053,0.0001088679,0.00023625247,0.00029394272,0.00035350086,0.00030209904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987474,0.00010887879,0.00026815827,0.00057507487,0.00017549806,0.00012497218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005194771,0.0003202455,0.0004588569,0.0000580504,0.00027734935,0.00005086993,0.0007969323,0.00019518798,0.00048508597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008036199,0.000234337,0.0005719004,0.0000072516177,0.0009442616,0.00013010428,0.00045912006,0.0004995613,0.0000046026234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020186155,0.000034566936,0.0000014507041,0.00012785755,0.00021160998,0.0000046270684,0.00062104425,8.269879e-7,0.000001251595,0.98245883,0.0158261,0.0006916675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022558609,0.000042779044,0.0000053293343,0.00013829274,0.0003362673,7.331424e-7,0.00005143195,0.000005664363,0.00004273584,0.054193437,0.9446983,0.0002594764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014802351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026421809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92887217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081160564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001153081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95559853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147604912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2314496","title":"Between Citizen &amp; Subject: Placing the People in Machiavelli's Political Imagination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Law; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.02171065348091497,"score_gpt":0.2447850280927986,"score_spread":0.22307437461188362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147604912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81448084,0.0013631867,0.0007108018,0.085960336,0.00060509366,0.00050228514,0.000023082965,0.000080481455,0.0962739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916831,0.0001371152,0.00001180786,0.00072080025,0.0026655095,0.000016508504,0.00001900443,0.000024936602,0.0047211954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963361,0.000206905,0.00040097217,0.00018952107,0.00033079265,0.002535703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917895,0.0003074728,0.0000800958,0.00015972348,0.000103202445,0.00017056122],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081249553,0.00018865828,0.00023061383,0.00011677446,0.00041707073,0.00030492758,0.00032498752,0.00005976956,0.0012254493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101250844,0.00012301138,0.00014165316,0.0000834912,0.00019272187,0.00031256705,0.00005185451,0.00201601,0.00045706576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007876456,0.000050536313,0.0033118948,0.0000054677967,0.00003927416,6.8693635e-7,0.0013821173,9.1790025e-7,0.000007641033,0.9931064,0.00017135467,0.001915831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041592188,0.00007781167,0.003799527,0.000020065643,0.000028618271,0.000056202465,0.0020341906,0.00003767716,0.000011836948,0.970117,0.02322625,0.00017490947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010755629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034739333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17720228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051154563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028535616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485723223","doi":"","title":"Friendship, Strength of Emotion, and Freedom in Spinoza","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Social psychology; Psychology; Communication; Political science","score_opus":0.020106972861105504,"score_gpt":0.21140665584753135,"score_spread":0.19129968298642586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485723223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87956744,0.00018628138,0.0000021682333,0.0024818112,0.00018136688,0.00007380762,0.00003539835,0.000015651345,0.117456056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848485,0.000008729604,0.000017174618,0.00018379976,0.00061412907,0.0000033173735,0.000006876402,0.000006878421,0.0006742285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993964,0.00004644012,0.00019645643,0.00010016507,0.00009981399,0.00016073608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970853,0.00008354351,0.000033769375,0.00012926341,0.00001821883,0.000026675998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008742432,0.00008177609,0.000120425044,0.000035365738,0.00005991421,0.000027293336,0.00009116398,0.000024160794,0.0010559224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010434539,0.00004849858,0.000043332835,0.000024077863,0.00032446094,0.00005868128,0.000032973632,0.00009585183,0.000024792364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013523409,0.00007114288,0.0011066248,0.000012982491,0.0000054562684,0.0000012175221,0.0010163959,0.000001873599,0.000014927666,0.99723077,0.0002226098,0.00030250024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010078496,0.00015638613,0.04688398,0.00007565646,0.000034010132,0.000004595804,0.0006763541,0.00018647662,0.00032479505,0.78986907,0.16054557,0.00023522715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039583453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016407539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20736165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006007425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037575599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486079164","doi":"10.20381/ruor-4453","title":"Leo Strauss's Critique of Martin Heidegger","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Levi strauss; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Humanities","score_opus":0.010401475838935895,"score_gpt":0.16858486729328587,"score_spread":0.15818339145434998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486079164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05890222,0.0006214302,7.261584e-7,0.001335352,0.0007031101,0.00016189997,0.0009141024,0.000009258599,0.9373519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8769307,0.00019950309,0.000046902725,0.0008728795,0.00030886065,0.0000095175,0.00013296759,0.0000335217,0.12146514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977972,0.00006187315,0.00049419235,0.00024982964,0.0010848456,0.00031205348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915874,0.000162317,0.00024112234,0.00018851335,0.0000019329855,0.0002473672],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000085383335,0.00027453137,0.00043404306,0.000026976302,0.00013718674,0.000022638254,0.00023638744,0.000057408084,0.0015258096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000041943804,0.0002434208,0.00007997079,0.000019933083,0.00015323411,0.0002028526,0.000048215483,0.00024646395,1.1522156e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000399598,0.000058594902,0.00028110546,0.00066214136,0.00010648118,0.000029658295,0.0005915079,2.9377756e-7,0.0003859465,0.9945751,0.0013148305,0.0015947716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075114664,0.00036709566,0.010790547,0.0013301412,0.00024824293,0.000005000084,0.018141914,0.000055298227,0.10254922,0.22340403,0.6411329,0.0012244536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008369556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09743355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002997526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007381445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500258600","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4133","title":"John Locke on Inference and Fallacy, A Re-Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Fallacy; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Toleration; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Rhetoric; Inference; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0582295715362343,"score_gpt":0.28651175291498754,"score_spread":0.22828218137875322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500258600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10296679,0.00004265783,0.0000506839,0.0024675934,0.0005601772,0.00009900117,0.000027147304,0.000108727996,0.89367723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189675,0.00001815799,0.00003678024,0.005834134,0.0009124935,0.000008378176,0.000015326752,0.0000073032165,0.0012706631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909115,0.00003174382,0.00022853643,0.00014508325,0.00018447282,0.0003189979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926174,0.00033259348,0.000047682002,0.000158202,0.000042900418,0.00015687326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012774768,0.0001567523,0.00017028968,0.000049855014,0.00019620695,0.00014549731,0.00014037652,0.0000621263,0.0014100239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021064209,0.00010740621,0.000056720313,0.000022327273,0.00028085598,0.00020760568,0.00008760358,0.00021045927,0.00063417904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039261857,0.00004002956,0.00017164886,0.000020491661,0.000008005286,0.0000018184653,0.000998458,0.0000029321823,0.0000015844382,0.9935466,0.0006884269,0.004480714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000353064,0.00051823264,0.0011027615,0.00002786448,0.000009262608,0.0000031983209,0.00012773345,0.0003017881,0.000025791103,0.09659139,0.9007382,0.0002007493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000490094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039689254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90004975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007230181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009950524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507659221","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2125187","title":"Contra Politanism: Against the Teleology of Political Forms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02325209007537717,"score_gpt":0.24728944696807323,"score_spread":0.22403735689269605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507659221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59295994,0.008558882,0.00037121162,0.030950302,0.0018635746,0.00033016677,0.000060985047,0.00006606207,0.36483887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922129,0.00035061815,0.0000058977853,0.0020841372,0.0036844576,0.00000442829,0.000004865384,0.000019193343,0.0016335126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546397,0.00013896466,0.00041082545,0.000102084196,0.00026299743,0.0036211621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914426,0.0002183203,0.00011491731,0.00017141696,0.00009469159,0.00025637058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094610685,0.00016903627,0.00026010498,0.00005562424,0.00034846197,0.00003875845,0.00032051431,0.00007430407,0.0004613129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009294811,0.00009298955,0.00023759647,0.00003563333,0.0006069193,0.00021045533,0.00004781323,0.0013892327,0.00008119796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000336088,0.0001575476,0.00041092295,0.000005605896,0.00013188647,7.5188984e-7,0.00071257225,1.4046041e-7,0.000022946435,0.9972776,0.00010760985,0.0011387956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004015884,0.00022693438,0.00027749952,0.000009612951,0.00005317336,0.00016359214,0.004219017,0.000003990703,0.000084317304,0.90565926,0.08877229,0.00012871204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080560334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013064199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39925295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002631689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030221808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60356015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513512365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716730","title":"Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Prudence; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019850775716241414,"score_gpt":0.21401523493230512,"score_spread":0.1941644592160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513512365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194779,0.00088063674,0.000003506534,0.024421046,0.0025207319,0.00013495582,0.00010128392,0.000008981523,0.15245095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543947,0.000022122149,0.00005263438,0.0016790633,0.0026488302,0.0000012609003,0.000004018611,0.000013297561,0.00013932966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991271,0.000033658784,0.00034141447,0.00010666343,0.0001302305,0.0002609278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990102,0.00006490419,0.000104483144,0.000102346814,0.000101247926,0.000616826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019878309,0.000118657765,0.00019867496,0.00028540395,0.0001239651,0.000100802026,0.0001563355,0.000063016225,0.0008888841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009628371,0.000099657824,0.00007729787,0.00005254554,0.00032587038,0.00030042444,0.00000952575,0.00050906406,0.000027299808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107184605,0.000022175402,0.001774663,0.000017696568,0.00001017919,0.000098928176,0.0014727884,3.2920926e-7,0.00012946254,0.9952555,0.00038622678,0.0008213867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050419057,0.00011817841,0.0011646508,0.00007478705,0.000016828144,0.000072524206,0.00014908834,0.0000079086885,0.000076175165,0.686462,0.31119668,0.00015698829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006994609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01599282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31081045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027589806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014796261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9732658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515279436","doi":"10.24124/c677/2011242","title":"Benedict Spinoza on the Naturalness of Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Democracy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Perfection; Rationality; State (computer science); Natural (archaeology); Political philosophy; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.12646817222035067,"score_gpt":0.27356599070024895,"score_spread":0.14709781847989828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515279436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008995581,0.0055287015,8.271719e-7,0.10767771,0.0007816851,0.0005095198,0.00015381236,0.00002858177,0.8763236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96378464,0.00044492717,0.000009996091,0.035073794,0.00030536496,0.000011043905,0.0000021915077,0.00000739413,0.00036066773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977313,0.000072958384,0.0003169058,0.0002455679,0.0003868903,0.0012463352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976639,0.00015738023,0.000047176043,0.0003799785,0.00016502116,0.0015865302],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070156105,0.00014535569,0.0002558367,0.000087552864,0.0004762671,0.000041593292,0.0007285857,0.000031552583,0.0082084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090476935,0.00007893244,0.00013768542,0.00020820634,0.0026574277,0.00014772158,0.000044050703,0.00022187566,0.00037103434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0833083e-7,0.000021594156,0.000027673179,0.00012571845,0.000004039359,0.00000466675,0.000117967946,2.485485e-9,9.557263e-7,0.9971609,0.0011085857,0.0014269982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059406968,0.00011734297,0.0017178762,0.0015773479,0.000051568557,0.000009549847,0.00010749285,0.0000062119807,0.00021658583,0.5643483,0.43155187,0.00023642495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021884471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003326397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95478904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001726204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050447334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99269825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515559955","doi":"10.1353/ren.0.0197","title":": <i> <i>The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's</i> Leviathan </i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Index (typography); History; Humanities; Media studies; Art; Art history; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044068327765861594,"score_gpt":0.23788055156871646,"score_spread":0.19381222380285487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515559955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5463176,0.0025496266,0.00019924223,0.030610517,0.004320932,0.00090513204,0.00021016158,0.0005398032,0.414347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712975,0.000045949695,0.000026417036,0.0020105783,0.002480336,0.00004603361,0.000013726994,0.000029851559,0.008217378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998261,0.000091911585,0.00035948193,0.00032492235,0.0003570851,0.00060560345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891055,0.00017727035,0.00006719927,0.0004357989,0.00009456158,0.0003146332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013924635,0.00023522822,0.00025375985,0.00003957755,0.0012318058,0.00014854675,0.0003812243,0.00004508316,0.00016821665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015501038,0.00015961987,0.00016401178,0.0000821086,0.00049296446,0.00017281706,0.000024098756,0.0002256495,0.0015734566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006186245,0.0001506985,0.00019105765,0.000018278211,0.000028892515,0.000031580286,0.00572145,9.514385e-7,0.0002166175,0.8321185,0.15685421,0.0046058856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026967656,0.0004338716,0.000947003,0.000040098894,0.000011048911,0.000025440771,0.00034393303,0.000014713733,0.000120059056,0.004665632,0.9928625,0.00026602537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013805904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094436764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8360083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035338515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024239172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519328188","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.456","title":"Whately on Arguments Involving Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1307698772028859,"score_gpt":0.2664980630822711,"score_spread":0.13572818587938518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519328188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.285854,0.000106410684,0.0000036877589,0.0009812497,0.0009513537,0.000120694145,0.000032122578,0.00014061538,0.7118099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98788905,0.00006157543,0.000027477834,0.0040759863,0.00087268784,0.00000975202,0.000026287093,0.000008571916,0.0070285946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988893,0.000028329074,0.00027171505,0.00014152573,0.00027532162,0.00039376624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950486,0.00006688239,0.00005395399,0.00016247739,0.00005200848,0.000159813],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010075269,0.00016209115,0.00016639612,0.000057972582,0.0004914107,0.00007933652,0.00018218346,0.00006319333,0.003123594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051666,0.0001169689,0.00011074158,0.000032014177,0.0002468442,0.00041441532,0.00005134879,0.00025414512,0.0021291655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038651742,0.00010981063,0.0004064639,0.000013099481,0.000014378762,0.000026587737,0.0021079232,0.0000033530189,0.000003291177,0.9955996,0.00090443704,0.00077237474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094707,0.00045528414,0.004206309,0.00004014454,0.000011852001,0.00002110525,0.00025932613,0.00008620493,0.00019508974,0.094280876,0.8995892,0.00034515467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004378189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000080917625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9013187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025800096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016859032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532360327","doi":"","title":"Continental Philosophy in Britain and America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continental philosophy; History; Geography; Geology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09409582805681857,"score_gpt":0.28921709229614956,"score_spread":0.195121264239331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532360327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37952846,0.0003057644,0.000016282675,0.023340702,0.00012436252,0.000456479,0.0001454601,0.000108808425,0.5959737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868508,0.00014307126,0.00009641235,0.00033199065,0.00068044866,0.0000041713242,0.000035012843,0.00002429977,0.011833768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976835,0.000328832,0.00024642824,0.00040921502,0.00048020133,0.00085180206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867755,0.00043355554,0.000042070005,0.0003121699,0.00015934762,0.00037533458],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036660154,0.00021086619,0.00031078703,0.00078850705,0.0006266751,0.00014422924,0.00046466288,0.000088931076,0.0014150359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094913674,0.00021121776,0.000119330936,0.00039978357,0.0014441088,0.0004764711,0.00045680327,0.00078608113,0.00021722302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019648693,0.00045629786,0.0012093452,0.000034478388,0.000034719156,0.00017658262,0.001443677,0.0000033868132,0.000016063364,0.98614895,0.0031223618,0.0071576326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011663504,0.00026909684,0.00061540585,0.00006706686,0.000009976452,0.000011899656,0.0023493094,0.00025376328,0.000018219926,0.03249038,0.9624892,0.00025937296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006344518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001539675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001969675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052997522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533663822","doi":"10.1080/03612759.2000.10525480","title":"Squaring the Circle: The War between Hobbes and Wallis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History Reviews of New Books","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"History; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.13612469724014664,"score_gpt":0.2535461457230309,"score_spread":0.11742144848288427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533663822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019296493,0.24092157,0.0000039795345,0.007880939,0.00067518675,0.0007243519,0.000023874738,0.000056362893,0.73041725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6371124,0.040377717,0.00007590729,0.011608761,0.011401588,0.000072477575,0.00001887702,0.00008076286,0.29925153],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989939,0.00013941426,0.0003720137,0.00016165819,0.00014744057,0.00018561709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929136,0.00016832679,0.000088227316,0.0003373067,0.000018594543,0.00009617494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030063416,0.00013644132,0.00032156974,0.00001597182,0.00022951973,0.00001861641,0.0002749598,0.000031449807,0.0055879843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028314915,0.000071804876,0.00016700587,0.000011989962,0.0005750936,0.00007113526,0.000035470188,0.00019597948,0.00017181599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017425271,0.00004529411,0.000080952086,0.00023182297,0.00006349302,0.000001868872,0.020103795,2.1114015e-7,0.000008841428,0.35611108,0.20249337,0.42084187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102436425,0.000039098206,0.0002765242,0.00008819902,0.00007724288,0.0000015043609,0.000051186682,0.0000011845881,0.0000039476745,0.012801771,0.98645926,0.00009767276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024650883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032665066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7839659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003879509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021395217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99532104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555382697","doi":"10.1353/ren.2008.0558","title":": <i>Paranoia and Modernity: Cervantes to Rousseau</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Paranoia; Index (typography); Modernity; History; Economic history; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.018543780879952898,"score_gpt":0.21732091359523667,"score_spread":0.19877713271528377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555382697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6911974,0.0024306183,0.00049834745,0.01598057,0.0007976102,0.0005102221,0.00019995056,0.00038211312,0.28800315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912393,0.000006957267,0.00011567636,0.0013131924,0.0015440553,0.00002613704,0.000014869412,0.000024038965,0.005715758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877185,0.000042207685,0.00025566446,0.00031758464,0.00020189412,0.00041083075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943143,0.000073391544,0.000039481434,0.00021900861,0.00005555021,0.00018111033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000070472255,0.00019966112,0.00023744407,0.000056288893,0.00025787376,0.00020266,0.00014112778,0.000044724187,0.0004564608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070131146,0.00016386734,0.00007416894,0.000042445823,0.00021776155,0.00019872525,0.000017134402,0.00013052489,0.0003488293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004699151,0.00014234202,0.000281074,0.000043717573,0.0000154742,0.00001404299,0.003072741,0.0000031905618,0.00026338716,0.9788726,0.011904187,0.005340254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004061469,0.00047906348,0.001294602,0.00007314245,0.000025425177,0.000008738841,0.00029746754,0.00012698429,0.0001808488,0.28616184,0.7105699,0.00037580787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042538624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029986902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69866574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015796115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008606074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66823167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567357280","doi":"10.4000/ahrf.7333","title":"Les Lumières radicales. La Philosophie, Spinoza et la naissance de la modernité (1650-1750)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Annales historiques de la Révolution française","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.025213177472480315,"score_gpt":0.279801469906863,"score_spread":0.2545882924343827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567357280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051143035,0.32880753,0.0010812866,0.010268974,0.0009334534,0.000321462,0.00062981044,0.00048115978,0.6063333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338713,0.011178265,0.00061698107,0.0014593184,0.0062139425,0.00008614378,0.00014382704,0.00014567935,0.0462845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936929,0.0029511778,0.0008701051,0.0007589084,0.0006178481,0.0011091077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966804,0.0017207754,0.0002970778,0.00052558316,0.00023197466,0.000544227],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013400465,0.0007610129,0.00071785063,0.00025765214,0.0010488332,0.00039428566,0.0005589003,0.001077023,0.0012773934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025262838,0.00079689285,0.000651401,0.00016185165,0.006055106,0.0005512248,0.00013534051,0.0015981791,0.000184299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000174181,0.0014091898,0.0008931924,0.0003827993,0.00009852703,0.00033593416,0.0032218625,0.00015222661,0.00008967962,0.8278637,0.16276693,0.0026118022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008023252,0.000119551914,0.0024984675,0.0004632145,0.00015408618,0.00017075411,0.000053837357,0.0005853468,0.00006388256,0.21886997,0.775532,0.00068659015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010971454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005653024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069371366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025510672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158592271","doi":"10.1007/978-94-015-9777-7_7","title":"Spinoza and Boyle: Rational Religion and Natural Philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural (archaeology); Natural philosophy; Conversation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; History; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.038000239693495495,"score_gpt":0.23163844464101735,"score_spread":0.19363820494752185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158592271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012991716,0.0047479863,0.0000016027508,0.007824354,0.0005902128,0.00018446817,0.00009771457,0.00007472826,0.98634905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07406306,0.0025953222,0.000033623895,0.005367676,0.0058578392,0.0000056618564,0.00021341015,0.00004773648,0.91181564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988323,0.000011350097,0.00029731277,0.00038242328,0.0002582287,0.0002184249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994433,0.00008329912,0.00007361723,0.00014823336,0.00007902612,0.00017252355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004784014,0.00033703918,0.00032065637,0.00008964096,0.00024030473,0.0001568898,0.00007998038,0.00017483371,0.0043798746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011023881,0.0002551577,0.00010632826,0.0000051359916,0.0005195779,0.00013090664,0.000095012154,0.00039990494,0.00015500831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026912372,0.000014483578,0.0000028023117,0.00004767563,0.000047341713,0.000015778944,0.00010787529,1.5425707e-8,6.8592374e-7,0.98991233,0.008977288,0.0008468385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014689214,0.000045764693,0.00000632976,0.000062336665,0.000029330238,0.000017530934,0.0000030336455,0.0000058558985,6.9215e-7,0.487118,0.5123758,0.00018847857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003024627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032482454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5033985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019822379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014728551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592944988","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716589","title":"Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Human being; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Theology; Humanity","score_opus":0.041950645943017395,"score_gpt":0.2478387356892383,"score_spread":0.20588808974622091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592944988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7853185,0.005561655,0.000003790698,0.05089615,0.0011656118,0.000116625524,0.00008721931,0.000008600517,0.15684184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99240875,0.000028826507,0.000034758323,0.002562433,0.004627508,7.9057656e-7,0.0000016579564,0.000011066069,0.00032417913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990474,0.000045634868,0.00033802135,0.00010797232,0.0001725679,0.00028842027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990699,0.000037406295,0.000084181534,0.00006759591,0.00008848524,0.00065241527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020456928,0.00011879013,0.0002124393,0.00028511256,0.00014269071,0.000114077186,0.00016427963,0.00004695563,0.0022500055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055118973,0.00010292794,0.000103568986,0.000051163097,0.0003473199,0.00054746505,0.000012145168,0.00031943698,0.000056943576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017721266,0.00004272473,0.00078956835,0.000026297219,0.000028440394,0.00015976674,0.0063975677,0.0000025053514,0.0000055864643,0.9887044,0.0010175292,0.002807881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010919349,0.00019644573,0.0035799998,0.00018612415,0.000039707786,0.00016046771,0.00061688863,0.000038761627,0.000028551669,0.6025532,0.3912007,0.00030722763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012964992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02450451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39018315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100266916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016954044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593216411","doi":"","title":"George R. Clay. Tolstoy's Phoenix: From Method to Meaning in \"War and Peace\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International fiction review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Phoenix; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Art history; History; Art; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04412079408283683,"score_gpt":0.31199922119341866,"score_spread":0.26787842711058185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593216411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021451386,0.055243712,0.0005040977,0.06066701,0.0021691807,0.00088924385,0.00046484178,0.00017539722,0.85843515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6543489,0.18546572,0.0051973616,0.094563045,0.008800181,0.00033947531,0.0006756403,0.0001117227,0.050497923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989451,0.00010059708,0.00034704767,0.00024700438,0.00021506425,0.0001451979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.00012096356,0.000039327875,0.000101697646,0.000055722994,0.00009970871],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002037919,0.00012261448,0.00021719295,0.000057270758,0.00006983391,0.000052737134,0.0001349207,0.000030417847,0.032306883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005036641,0.0001038348,0.000079946956,0.00004366823,0.000030370104,0.00015216785,0.00003300389,0.00015020967,0.00048529677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000788439,0.00021382704,0.00024414668,0.00019970933,0.00010588977,0.00002668312,0.0029373397,0.000022980941,0.00006325683,0.73543334,0.047369424,0.21330455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016412447,0.000021604032,0.00026418254,0.0008143581,0.000020905036,0.0000066228563,0.000029427918,0.00012697572,0.000019445091,0.007209899,0.99120164,0.00012083304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039678428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056837038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004755583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066485954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96857774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596342993","doi":"","title":"Mécanismes guerriers et fondation de l'État dans la pensée politique de Thomas Hobbes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sens public","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.034565466980952315,"score_gpt":0.2805930422654168,"score_spread":0.2460275752844645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596342993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09890871,0.0020282073,0.00027663357,0.42777923,0.00083689473,0.00024086941,0.0007022423,0.00020035761,0.46902683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94346833,0.0009993857,0.0006813668,0.008585483,0.0054987576,0.000021835856,0.00019353563,0.00007303838,0.040478263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663335,0.000841987,0.00045708808,0.0004220335,0.00033532505,0.0013102177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816996,0.00047032777,0.000116254894,0.00035005907,0.00015872814,0.0007346973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006629132,0.00039363367,0.0003392367,0.0001554779,0.00057452294,0.000791609,0.00030076684,0.0003234186,0.0026618133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029931086,0.00038019722,0.00027387188,0.000101854326,0.0013207127,0.00071053894,0.000114076014,0.00063757255,0.0003231794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015420917,0.0003710528,0.0003617502,0.00007866784,0.000099162295,0.000042331478,0.01031048,0.000014232036,0.00012119203,0.9744726,0.011786335,0.002326779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003453487,0.000087330736,0.0013196674,0.0000651982,0.00007159699,0.00013538731,0.0023873185,0.00041779724,0.00033947275,0.25883707,0.73565334,0.00034046153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015903484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012486846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8445596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004695724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043549293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602283537","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511763144.018","title":"Bayle's Republic of Atheists","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.045068278594500674,"score_gpt":0.20105049037874712,"score_spread":0.15598221178424643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602283537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024621806,0.00010393303,0.0000070826504,0.000120277095,0.0007743255,0.00023744052,0.0010848291,0.000101394864,0.9973245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01080363,0.00004573276,0.000022940256,0.00015885012,0.001046326,4.48895e-7,0.000090749185,0.000046187222,0.98778516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987011,0.000029486055,0.00027636578,0.00039899262,0.00029732825,0.0002967559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985839,0.00010724128,0.00024162243,0.0005778193,0.00025573527,0.00023364087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007703478,0.00034543613,0.00049023714,0.00014429931,0.00021574621,0.000053860782,0.00052104297,0.00035500719,0.0004173445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016017999,0.00034279635,0.00040331468,0.0000027962055,0.0011002101,0.00008382261,0.00029107643,0.0007416245,0.00004600861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056019664,0.000027998307,2.8096406e-7,0.00010838838,0.00012646755,0.00006285456,0.00020590881,2.118821e-8,0.000019292962,0.9902004,0.008776016,0.00041634863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032193112,0.00006679298,0.0000026417026,0.000120702476,0.00017707025,0.0000055395403,0.00002161435,0.0000020151729,0.00022396278,0.0021033487,0.9965969,0.00035753543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015083235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010181178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048900285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057131296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603308367","doi":"","title":"Nikolai Bukharin. How It All Began","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International fiction review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07606156275727156,"score_gpt":0.2979435055583867,"score_spread":0.22188194280111517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603308367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075895677,0.008667497,0.000015099128,0.18759581,0.001953273,0.00024901584,0.00013116564,0.00011881015,0.80051035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47075662,0.09255717,0.000059029204,0.08333829,0.0073973713,0.00010499458,0.0005235567,0.000041527906,0.34522143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990013,0.000047491903,0.00026340113,0.00020720222,0.00031165915,0.00016893071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.000049996073,0.000052955234,0.00014853508,0.000108417305,0.00009820296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011514864,0.00013418721,0.00017432557,0.000035687688,0.000100941055,0.00013810206,0.00023255893,0.00003230128,0.10317453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004380752,0.00010688139,0.00018611482,0.00002821664,0.000075626514,0.00023971507,0.000022846922,0.00015746785,0.002318277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001135619,0.00012348799,0.000013673028,0.00015151085,0.000089333684,0.0000060730945,0.00018251182,0.0000012628265,0.0000037358793,0.6950122,0.27872798,0.025676845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012293254,0.000025551077,0.000037994236,0.0005073866,0.000037792408,0.000012485247,0.000012619541,0.00004272965,0.0000064743385,0.005423487,0.99364364,0.00012689942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032381686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010593215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71491563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046885692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008473709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606475791","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527944.011","title":"Natural Rights in Locke's Two Treatises","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Gentry; Classics; History; Legend; Law; Art; Philosophy; Ancient history; Art history; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03326505422701463,"score_gpt":0.2097487892938587,"score_spread":0.17648373506684406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606475791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031927368,0.00026470516,0.000001943049,0.00009718953,0.0006711497,0.00032907398,0.0005457408,0.000119687786,0.9976512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09630721,0.000022346163,0.000012530134,0.00018771786,0.00091447437,7.289864e-7,0.00014287012,0.000030062112,0.9023821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851084,0.000038465536,0.00027776865,0.0004890109,0.00027660243,0.00040730266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991512,0.00008153263,0.00012597005,0.0003469845,0.00009497557,0.00019938474],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000040411884,0.0004516262,0.00050059386,0.00021034945,0.00027213446,0.00008434148,0.00039941122,0.0001945471,0.00028281187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036991544,0.00042601247,0.00030067525,0.0000041867675,0.0006794063,0.00012219002,0.00018670656,0.0006877928,0.00008300839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009436789,0.00003412326,4.985644e-7,0.000048292008,0.000088533074,0.0005943016,0.00025170654,7.662535e-7,0.00000111101,0.9921074,0.0065855957,0.00019329073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011919289,0.000051359715,0.0000032446424,0.00028262695,0.00013600908,0.00000667494,0.000020009978,0.0000056369045,0.00004559897,0.012642433,0.9850989,0.0005155874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022069134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002154548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003104926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006133855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606860543","doi":"","title":"Humanism and Antinomianism: Spinoza on Beasts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Anthropocentrism; Materialism; Reactionary; Politics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.020623937557597633,"score_gpt":0.23546704945462796,"score_spread":0.21484311189703031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606860543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6651806,0.0044670827,0.00010396132,0.0302092,0.0010834398,0.00027064636,0.000018982862,0.00014551057,0.29852054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878122,0.0010027441,0.000008758674,0.0031393606,0.002612735,9.582793e-7,0.0000033917215,0.000014397143,0.005405463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768025,0.000057590823,0.00024053517,0.00019736224,0.00021974307,0.0016045389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995724,0.000035067336,0.00007330488,0.000117269316,0.00004230511,0.00015966549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038018977,0.00018430385,0.00019337823,0.00007781473,0.00050771766,0.0001835595,0.00016348391,0.000058343816,0.00035641383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002202685,0.00014039064,0.000110585934,0.0000220952,0.0001276167,0.0001545155,0.000016754719,0.0014230103,0.00012743476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038214806,0.000116048905,0.000017940403,0.0000022358583,0.00003412671,0.0000073565757,0.0004054789,3.407223e-7,0.000027150363,0.98748714,0.00019203055,0.011671936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050585176,0.0010500212,0.0004337484,0.000025163912,0.000024342735,0.0001549603,0.00041043226,0.000005709228,0.000035358113,0.88957363,0.107601024,0.00017976755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013636876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040030445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32263154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013638355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013030227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61823505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689745565","doi":"","title":"TURRETIN AND EDWARDS ONCE MORE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Online Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Materialism; Compatibilism; Free will","score_opus":0.028343875053935923,"score_gpt":0.26186805698245985,"score_spread":0.23352418192852392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689745565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81064445,0.001352049,0.0003506128,0.083906166,0.0028112938,0.00011384786,0.00014884575,0.00009672863,0.10057603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874359,0.00013551798,0.00040313692,0.003289957,0.0062223915,7.1663555e-7,0.000011809743,0.000014183632,0.0024864385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922913,0.000058082114,0.00020275202,0.0001046653,0.00018486766,0.00022051572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995119,0.000072263436,0.000056518573,0.000080430014,0.00006773107,0.00021116486],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016707579,0.00010535031,0.00014686502,0.000025418483,0.00025256674,0.00014842596,0.00010442513,0.00003218503,0.0014966112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089364185,0.00007230654,0.000070201604,0.000014022136,0.00019078155,0.00010395316,0.00003840342,0.0003967698,0.000036198537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038440903,0.00027587646,0.00041823403,0.000030838444,0.00004122575,0.000018276853,0.0024519784,0.0000028065147,0.000050988914,0.9041364,0.008126833,0.08440808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032792063,0.00009421991,0.0012290487,0.000056178193,0.000019619027,0.000087445405,0.00021547351,0.0005625453,0.000010464363,0.052526932,0.94475126,0.00011888876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001028694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001211278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9366244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012048738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011240707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1717412269","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498275.009","title":"Stoics, Grotius, and Spinoza on Moral Deliberation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Literal (mathematical logic); Interpretation (philosophy); Literal and figurative language; Deliberation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.061458817884329664,"score_gpt":0.19960013981442742,"score_spread":0.13814132193009776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1717412269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002987587,0.00016403776,0.000010011051,0.00019743052,0.0005382345,0.0003103547,0.0005065245,0.00008471401,0.99788994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005576148,0.00010399035,0.000015069951,0.0011587424,0.00072553277,6.496965e-7,0.00010203263,0.000040721614,0.9922771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998856,0.00004440437,0.00017915457,0.00042181177,0.00023321403,0.00026538086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992382,0.000053703716,0.00010432346,0.00027827037,0.00010831817,0.00021716564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004974054,0.00035398372,0.0003320315,0.000106581276,0.00035906638,0.000113125214,0.00017028995,0.00022017922,0.000082268794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000067577457,0.00035904915,0.00015865234,0.0000019174588,0.00050949206,0.00008900637,0.000103546605,0.0004544825,0.000041047337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006294187,0.000019854815,4.2015478e-7,0.000051140836,0.00007214238,0.000069012014,0.00011525512,3.68569e-7,8.3491614e-7,0.97215414,0.026961122,0.0004927403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043833564,0.00014081103,0.0000035238947,0.00011911047,0.0001383458,0.000005454104,0.00002676516,0.000011127134,0.00002481512,0.0028558625,0.99583435,0.0004014964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048684054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037694676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087816756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021686905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734524275","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527944.005","title":"The Problem of Grotius and Hobbes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Parliament; Law; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Commonwealth; Natural law; Separation of church and state; Nothing; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03411386547644157,"score_gpt":0.18819460964816473,"score_spread":0.15408074417172316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734524275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000115187846,0.00049691857,0.0000030764802,0.0001894722,0.00014502465,0.0003016274,0.00038559834,0.000043135035,0.99832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01397934,0.0003477157,0.000015983967,0.00006921033,0.00036215756,6.005246e-7,0.000016245258,0.000024326811,0.98518443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912703,0.000024522418,0.00018599622,0.00024543525,0.00019562949,0.0002213762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992514,0.00012629665,0.00013985489,0.00023940168,0.00011770653,0.00012528655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000059610877,0.00023942118,0.00028542947,0.000048826718,0.00039107722,0.00006414563,0.0002827061,0.00013340774,0.00002729477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031664185,0.00018267147,0.00016540798,0.0000016688196,0.0013699307,0.000049082864,0.00022549638,0.0003112502,0.0000072959574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049447575,0.000010602042,2.3951873e-7,0.000119893666,0.00011294264,0.00002581419,0.00030394638,1.3459496e-7,0.0000013131246,0.9956168,0.0029838856,0.0007749933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032438204,0.00007735683,0.0000023653852,0.00019224992,0.00014458706,0.0000036428607,0.000076661614,0.0000010526251,0.00003494659,0.015333248,0.98359936,0.00021015968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001858897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000868596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98061544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048208985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004254365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7449126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781552152","doi":"10.3138/topia.8.91","title":"George Grant and Leo Strauss: Modernist and Postmodernist Conservatisms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Art; Art history; Psychology","score_opus":0.16141122880671205,"score_gpt":0.2679621421943576,"score_spread":0.10655091338764555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781552152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8857171,0.040638793,0.000002051013,0.044824198,0.00069902674,0.00012518615,0.00014083194,0.000012895115,0.027839951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920975,0.0013096452,0.000034583383,0.0012918473,0.00063182204,0.0000013282106,0.000001573663,0.000007268564,0.004624454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.000038097653,0.00029898045,0.00011224081,0.00013304359,0.00028459023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917644,0.000062684616,0.000090858026,0.000054847464,0.0002013385,0.0004138392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000074103606,0.00015653524,0.00030559924,0.000045796365,0.00058267906,0.00019979975,0.00008567447,0.00003303098,0.0005074814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006470673,0.00010020146,0.00006617183,0.00001650008,0.0008178095,0.00022691848,0.000018556411,0.00018541538,0.000008829325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018799226,0.000028519236,0.0017255917,0.00008324741,0.00035132718,0.00018728976,0.041391645,0.0000012384413,0.000011663566,0.93975806,0.010922646,0.005519961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088070397,0.0003773381,0.0034635933,0.00017558376,0.00015566741,0.0003598813,0.008972131,0.00009276034,0.00001430984,0.08002693,0.90508604,0.00039506887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036748967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029744336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89416337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038562408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001830063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180170357","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-2381-0_7","title":"Spinoza's Eternal Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immortality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Self; Theology","score_opus":0.15642576640068467,"score_gpt":0.28487781440510207,"score_spread":0.1284520480044174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180170357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017147302,0.04513259,8.1608405e-8,0.0016811537,0.002715513,0.0002624798,0.00012360765,0.000012525658,0.94990057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2213891,0.003631536,0.00015500195,0.0020166405,0.009369797,0.000021215163,0.000033022738,0.000095104166,0.76328856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789155,0.00006861198,0.00083690305,0.00033760155,0.00060623395,0.00025909877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850744,0.00027275248,0.0005049532,0.00047930903,0.00018202925,0.00005354],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031275197,0.00042743306,0.0009423128,0.00021808837,0.00008913115,0.000004906997,0.00062222703,0.00016130478,0.001285575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039004688,0.0003041189,0.00049381587,0.000011461871,0.0028482317,0.000057874986,0.00010326688,0.0005537267,0.00006742189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006355711,0.00018420174,8.4263746e-7,0.00036204298,0.00031589888,0.000034548983,0.027512133,3.0348033e-7,0.0000013753631,0.95657426,0.013383479,0.0015673614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019436235,0.0002578881,0.0000024214817,0.00041877152,0.00012631649,0.0000032922048,0.0001182152,2.5242207e-7,0.0000016867526,0.45268586,0.54602003,0.00017090986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012833311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015979283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5326365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031895027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064329266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1829447795","doi":"","title":"Freedom Under an Order of Public Law: From Hobbes Through Hayek to Republicanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negative liberty; Law; Liberalism; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); CONTEST; Theme (computing); Classical liberalism; Politics; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.24696356548208112,"score_gpt":0.3268942416251041,"score_spread":0.07993067614302299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1829447795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21706468,0.00023870301,0.0007443271,0.014629358,0.00089231523,0.0002584063,0.00016866939,0.00020875166,0.7657948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98598033,0.000010599734,0.0023330974,0.0048726057,0.0010161,0.000015831502,0.000045169796,0.00003425224,0.005692014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985893,0.00010718848,0.00027879584,0.00034102815,0.0002728432,0.00041086617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879885,0.000092300135,0.00007253461,0.00051607325,0.0002195395,0.0003007329],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117824224,0.00019562406,0.00028497135,0.000046222493,0.00014389982,0.00011424583,0.0003551887,0.000078544246,0.020835571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060808816,0.00015481935,0.00009456163,0.000078990706,0.00046011098,0.0004109116,0.000118351345,0.00016194301,0.00026501014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023420722,0.00033067615,0.000035945548,0.0000072866724,0.000055211978,0.0000025873835,0.03497059,5.703406e-7,0.00007115199,0.9622131,0.0021515533,0.00013789121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002914691,0.00024984402,0.0003249424,0.000017473498,0.000029494331,8.2122426e-7,0.0053621684,0.000009187053,0.00065427105,0.46747807,0.52534723,0.00023499646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015144226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023155864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76891565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021190293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003245123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942255890","doi":"10.22329/p.v7i2.3820","title":"Hasana Sharp's &lt;i&gt;Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization&lt;/i&gt;: A Response","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04174719629087392,"score_gpt":0.2596420569460835,"score_spread":0.21789486065520958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942255890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8001825,0.027172677,0.00006076213,0.0315735,0.0019895155,0.0007878351,0.0005143764,0.00017248216,0.13754636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901132,0.00013919343,0.000037117166,0.0016388177,0.00148719,0.000017069535,0.000023716224,0.00002210695,0.00652157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984849,0.00029023038,0.0003438727,0.00016303729,0.00027369286,0.0004442398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871266,0.00057835004,0.000099039156,0.00028375635,0.00011546842,0.00021071489],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000481288,0.00018064475,0.00027426347,0.00006780019,0.0003354354,0.000068691515,0.00019771804,0.00006322373,0.0011284652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030829755,0.00011259598,0.00013234964,0.00006108239,0.0009655378,0.00021809406,0.00010017676,0.00012740653,0.000055936576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029939055,0.00010740946,0.00009478641,0.000036898688,0.0000477292,0.0000011140297,0.005356992,4.7257635e-7,0.00024391961,0.99072194,0.002910819,0.00017852933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012538423,0.000065876935,0.0016060073,0.00004938945,0.000102592385,0.000009789873,0.00011717327,0.00011388361,0.0006049525,0.11230029,0.8835634,0.00021281229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027663538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011790038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88065255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023860308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022871956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943661646","doi":"10.1111/papq.12087","title":"Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Universality (dynamical systems); Ontology","score_opus":0.06398916241848439,"score_gpt":0.2429104741561115,"score_spread":0.1789213117376271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943661646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27661648,0.0005576208,0.000021098676,0.04949172,0.0011048331,0.00035584305,0.00018952508,0.00019791715,0.671465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758214,0.000014951299,0.000043042353,0.00036286432,0.0012918307,0.0000071061118,0.000018490102,0.000022907425,0.0006566762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816847,0.00012745678,0.00039615025,0.0004046277,0.00049583043,0.00040747432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868506,0.00018710367,0.00011558618,0.00031132117,0.00015539983,0.00054552255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026825117,0.00026429415,0.00040450893,0.000118325144,0.00016285907,0.000078470664,0.00021487074,0.000117007476,0.00029121042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079183934,0.0002097431,0.00011794482,0.00007768674,0.00086016743,0.0002070155,0.000028412001,0.0003104165,0.00013241266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001700885,0.00026459823,0.00004466404,0.000037932725,0.000032333024,0.00001964216,0.006953686,2.6986692e-7,0.000020937008,0.98992765,0.00075935194,0.0017688175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007861787,0.0021017604,0.00006740575,0.000112823735,0.00003782461,0.0000098632045,0.003954269,0.000074383934,0.00005777762,0.941645,0.05085172,0.00030098046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004848168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004674291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003502889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038369053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8553076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945573432","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9191.2011.00386.x","title":"ON LAW, TRANSGRESSION, AND FORGIVENESS: HEGEL AND THE POLITICS OF LIBERALISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Forum","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Forgiveness; Liberalism; Politics; Citation; Marine transgression; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.056689563821492726,"score_gpt":0.23804338644763562,"score_spread":0.18135382262614289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945573432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24198413,0.0023642548,0.000026623786,0.5061215,0.00070713955,0.0008440541,0.00030308642,0.00009983886,0.24754934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889519,0.00008766684,0.000014047615,0.009991606,0.0005670814,0.00001992643,0.0000043836267,0.00002163638,0.0003417458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00017954213,0.00033222802,0.00021310063,0.0002450403,0.0003592922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877006,0.0006317326,0.0000729397,0.00031692206,0.000055716697,0.00015262545],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024942638,0.00020619102,0.00031414497,0.000029677865,0.0006116586,0.00004287942,0.00027129278,0.00007928432,0.00033417036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004883823,0.000093464456,0.00016433166,0.000030869065,0.0035986356,0.00008862041,0.00012317745,0.00031838095,0.000013727896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029659676,0.00013773535,0.000009868406,0.000031654687,0.000055981447,0.0000022271915,0.005122719,1.2340925e-7,0.0000039296037,0.9941228,0.000089573325,0.00012680248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011279354,0.00020169013,0.00007533774,0.000070889226,0.00008455029,0.000009616149,0.00022564856,0.000032069816,0.00012089242,0.9793711,0.018547753,0.00013256291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018728645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018118686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7469678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006023657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007894018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946077801","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527944","title":"The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Natural law; Law; Political philosophy; State of nature; History; Political science; Classics","score_opus":0.02390638862311904,"score_gpt":0.1934593595791523,"score_spread":0.16955297095603328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946077801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037790945,0.0016089743,0.0000038782605,0.0002393906,0.000214894,0.00021841565,0.00064592256,0.000025880194,0.99666476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003980667,0.0005805965,0.0000086820755,0.00012672745,0.0005031445,6.993012e-7,0.000051520496,0.000017564593,0.9947304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990218,0.000079420104,0.00021162297,0.00022938578,0.00017890478,0.00027883268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913824,0.00028641702,0.0001216336,0.0002448807,0.000087098764,0.000121753044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000057194586,0.00020416483,0.00030331942,0.00007568786,0.0002963149,0.000023487082,0.0002604961,0.00013168935,0.000007188993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001928118,0.00016362597,0.000115295,0.0000058181586,0.0014964876,0.00004750808,0.00021139294,0.0003898754,0.000002463234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048674156,0.000024794539,0.000002090993,0.00011456328,0.00004910826,0.000039382536,0.00091780827,5.3153707e-7,3.1236104e-7,0.9858611,0.012670719,0.00027088012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005120337,0.00006229759,0.000025847348,0.00018772727,0.00006975601,0.0000042427228,0.000074641044,0.000009302896,0.0000037514337,0.004684851,0.9941808,0.00018476824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043910154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001844462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98151004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024555146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002483115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66724735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W196222361","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_5","title":"An Invisible Nature: The Origin of Thomas Hobbes’s Civil Laws","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0386012694781873,"score_gpt":0.23559180865100346,"score_spread":0.19699053917281617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W196222361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011559004,0.00713368,4.1317116e-7,0.009737895,0.0007482382,0.00030866897,0.0009220914,0.0001388101,0.9808946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5577508,0.0033243417,0.000055811728,0.036733467,0.020964388,0.000026517802,0.0010039498,0.00029751664,0.37984318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814403,0.000077026445,0.00051738945,0.00051487016,0.00038768948,0.00035898344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985457,0.00022856629,0.00020531107,0.0006977255,0.00004452663,0.00027818704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000872749,0.00054309925,0.0006262715,0.00008615823,0.00039330503,0.00024173979,0.0005821497,0.0005154195,0.0068476363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003459161,0.00035071696,0.00031824113,0.000027187385,0.001457124,0.00066950463,0.00018543063,0.0011465896,0.00007882277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008076529,0.00009712437,0.000011219915,0.00015947202,0.00012732198,0.00003137614,0.00033917147,1.68829e-7,0.0000012433288,0.99318707,0.0057608513,0.00020420348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013967925,0.0001351307,0.0000019644403,0.00013057303,0.000059652855,0.0000062113945,0.0000044989647,0.0000017403858,0.000014751562,0.49993578,0.49933767,0.00023235602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049167327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003936794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60105145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007508254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040382063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964484056","doi":"10.7202/009811ar","title":"Le meilleur régime selon Leibniz","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.15795675768582132,"score_gpt":0.31523945609858,"score_spread":0.1572826984127587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964484056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034506784,0.04206674,0.000016577296,0.4512843,0.0016899045,0.0002908826,0.00036412055,0.00030289422,0.5005339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8717794,0.0035322597,0.0004386447,0.024066977,0.06129244,0.000043620737,0.00009665678,0.00013297709,0.038617026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963363,0.00034390594,0.00086696487,0.00075626303,0.0005477286,0.0011488388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980378,0.00026654542,0.00018685448,0.0006137925,0.00025825328,0.0006367528],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032892637,0.0006699594,0.000694393,0.00016929006,0.0010326735,0.00034071732,0.0005605419,0.0003654679,0.0074067307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009644303,0.0006588799,0.0005381137,0.000092175775,0.001397743,0.00089714327,0.00023382858,0.00081825745,0.005253081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006709419,0.0011378592,0.000021697317,0.00016882412,0.00017135733,0.000039603274,0.0013724555,0.00000996745,0.000036162513,0.9505882,0.04186147,0.0045252885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000444351,0.00016880286,0.000033250773,0.0001498951,0.00008482143,0.000020772597,0.00006482272,0.00010411334,0.00049340667,0.40740824,0.59053636,0.00049115426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086965185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019007105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8683287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017916934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014895518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966094773","doi":"10.1353/cjs.2006.0062","title":"Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Positivism; Law; Epistemology; Injustice; Disappointment; Democracy; Praise; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04212951516226033,"score_gpt":0.24710499121656612,"score_spread":0.2049754760543058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966094773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90004194,0.03579811,6.349197e-7,0.044161417,0.0011647843,0.00030655798,0.00007165545,0.0000032605556,0.018451648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610955,0.00016473394,0.0000021369199,0.0015076407,0.0009384428,0.0000017940916,0.0000022768997,0.000006115497,0.0012673362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987598,0.00034404194,0.00041017716,0.00007625804,0.00013860413,0.00027110506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904144,0.00028764203,0.00019114248,0.00014836187,0.00018534134,0.00014606617],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008640314,0.0000906511,0.00029481875,0.000056574107,0.00068186835,0.000048677393,0.00029173153,0.00003771483,0.0005274255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007549976,0.000043457232,0.000102489415,0.000028804136,0.00445135,0.000039886167,0.000017533186,0.00030833294,0.000007775251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007787798,0.000039009883,0.00039765052,0.000024471155,0.000052341038,0.000009077946,0.0054845675,0.000001268373,7.4436497e-7,0.98524797,0.008656611,0.0000785166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011398973,0.00026532018,0.003495133,0.00008877974,0.00022360061,0.00006067809,0.004287379,0.0000033551098,0.0000028699942,0.71323407,0.27710095,0.00009798024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010857057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044209547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2720139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034664048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002208417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967640434","doi":"10.7202/007723ar","title":"Phillis Wheatley and the Sentimental Tradition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentimentality; Poetry; Manifesto; Sensibility; Literature; Romance; Oppression; Politics; Enlightenment; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.032026646230292784,"score_gpt":0.21023121430428104,"score_spread":0.17820456807398827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967640434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5833058,0.0004203377,0.000020329839,0.15989223,0.0010541008,0.0005952396,0.00011664726,0.00010104415,0.2544943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910174,0.00004713625,0.0000053174062,0.0068704155,0.0010695806,0.000015850597,0.000015980759,0.000012143714,0.00094620214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992046,0.000081677055,0.00015730153,0.00015085177,0.00020315178,0.00020244977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948525,0.0002228035,0.000035477646,0.00018237151,0.000013287871,0.000060818096],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001658566,0.00013170231,0.00013932375,0.000021079411,0.00047403533,0.0001463355,0.00014295819,0.00002806332,0.0010547675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018280492,0.000060334736,0.00009355342,0.000022418815,0.00070424186,0.00007019858,0.000031123946,0.00017345847,0.00022742573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005778282,0.000086177104,0.0000016591775,0.000004411244,0.00003109205,0.0000037681336,0.0024717173,0.0000029912114,0.000013033776,0.9955138,0.0016866054,0.00012698575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015681732,0.00011587599,0.00015591456,0.000053591186,0.00006252253,0.000014273442,0.00048952043,0.000089435955,0.0003093739,0.9081984,0.088807784,0.00013514746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114266615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014675327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4077116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015884521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057799693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968812159","doi":"10.2466/pms.2001.92.1.299","title":"Reply to Fudin and Lembessis's Critique of Malik and Paraherakis's Commentary regarding the Capacity of the Unconscious","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Scope (computer science); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Personal unconscious; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03432317897900429,"score_gpt":0.25115721607512836,"score_spread":0.2168340370961241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968812159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32334876,0.0008092126,0.0000016212813,0.6683848,0.0005248296,0.0005809637,0.0010369245,0.00001810159,0.005294782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35405606,0.0006070661,0.000038112277,0.63820595,0.0030632103,0.000035520105,0.000026574246,0.000032573338,0.003934953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830985,0.00026370896,0.00043498533,0.00037050134,0.00028308632,0.0003378927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987443,0.0005638092,0.00013201985,0.0003553022,0.00009280102,0.000111734895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021084212,0.00031620293,0.00053506106,0.00005533423,0.0003479634,0.00008503515,0.00023955994,0.00018335257,0.00045226666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000826621,0.00017173398,0.00015464888,0.00003641347,0.0015737045,0.0000745524,0.00025283534,0.0007001798,0.0000021423614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006609254,0.00015167397,0.001094667,0.00054131966,0.00022162219,0.000021183474,0.026654191,1.9142148e-7,0.00013679659,0.022741836,0.9468159,0.0015545335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002902184,0.00017296345,0.0014603861,0.0003081544,0.00013278869,0.000038862632,0.0009294471,0.000001854744,0.000050913415,0.008034309,0.9883334,0.00024670464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017785111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015484051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041517504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002102304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012730345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7003108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971960450","doi":"10.1080/09608780801969266","title":"Modernity, The Human Animal and Philosophical Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.12834011770641915,"score_gpt":0.2577913704305848,"score_spread":0.12945125272416566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971960450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55903184,0.08190328,0.00028649953,0.14767908,0.014431073,0.0022539967,0.0011828532,0.00023499486,0.1929964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895507,0.0005270132,0.000021681506,0.0013839501,0.0063568465,0.000023537184,0.000011249077,0.000032317166,0.0020927037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984969,0.00013607784,0.0004844077,0.0002033151,0.00039967036,0.00027964506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989435,0.0003202203,0.00020991516,0.00018009084,0.00017803328,0.00016823674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003938457,0.0001851403,0.000293529,0.00005669555,0.0022117821,0.00006927942,0.0004078275,0.00007013971,0.00046191397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071819166,0.00013043669,0.00035244474,0.000022922128,0.0025524988,0.00023901436,0.000051430055,0.000620026,0.000007816541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010013076,0.00030359763,0.000009195078,0.00004605118,0.000098872,0.000046281835,0.00251736,0.0000019965507,0.00007844548,0.97344846,0.022609536,0.0007400678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007951052,0.0002986489,0.00030245978,0.00007709184,0.000097013755,0.0017562173,0.00006948363,0.000074310796,0.000006084279,0.71257454,0.28378192,0.00016710606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073330564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001241647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43051887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120987585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058867176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977119396","doi":"10.1163/157181012x638061","title":"The Exclusionary Boundary of the Early Modern International Community","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordic Journal of International Law","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Referent; International community; Character (mathematics); Law; Universality (dynamical systems); Hegelianism; Sociology; Political science; Public international law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04315197082929643,"score_gpt":0.2695386193016033,"score_spread":0.22638664847230686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977119396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48167586,0.0014850647,0.00007755901,0.021657618,0.013720765,0.000101213154,0.00013680078,0.000010965355,0.48113415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298227,0.00007260193,0.000028399974,0.0013529346,0.0030220803,0.000001558337,0.000004984358,0.0000098445,0.0025253098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831486,0.00021342614,0.00050899794,0.000045164095,0.00073749974,0.00018003705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998461,0.00045463073,0.0003486353,0.00017760589,0.00046648225,0.00009164159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070610637,0.000102234284,0.00013593445,0.00003971744,0.0006224446,0.00010381483,0.0010823979,0.00003606628,0.00079179526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013784366,0.000052373645,0.0002770863,0.000022725808,0.0007412014,0.000414333,0.0002811009,0.00060231786,0.000017528253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010541174,0.00028802155,0.0020459082,0.0000039789943,0.00020137524,0.0000012764891,0.003306752,0.0000041284725,0.000054327582,0.9912376,0.0013592149,0.0013920506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003369827,0.00005974284,0.0061077387,0.00007055013,0.000026990438,0.00005469732,0.000352082,0.000033111955,0.00011352629,0.21859092,0.7741843,0.00006938713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014447859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000062931984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77282506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006915808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003926714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8669603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978448772","doi":"10.5840/epoche20141138","title":"The Hobbesian Ethics of Hegel's Sense-Certainty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epoché A Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Certainty; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09766390261886065,"score_gpt":0.278435884249824,"score_spread":0.18077198163096336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978448772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010706018,0.039635643,0.0019195835,0.30604136,0.05581602,0.0017092712,0.00031392268,0.0001280537,0.58373016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98468465,0.0002330172,0.000069928814,0.002011378,0.0051493705,0.000012213211,0.0000032727723,0.000035601846,0.0078005632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797785,0.0003558687,0.00067300466,0.00015117042,0.00051324465,0.00032884104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569243,0.0028466873,0.0004923735,0.00039883264,0.0004186221,0.00015104662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017227236,0.00020023699,0.00034952725,0.00006892256,0.0010646346,0.00003805487,0.00049528305,0.00009598958,0.00030589665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007021658,0.00010605217,0.0005740522,0.000029656403,0.0017857522,0.00009380741,0.00005015447,0.0007939492,0.000016309015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002009609,0.000096981385,0.000003070456,0.00008699804,0.00012759604,0.0000014205883,0.0057912474,0.00001014507,0.0000444414,0.9782116,0.014670831,0.00075473904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028003694,0.00019799851,0.0000052718547,0.000049858827,0.0000643835,0.000016074335,0.0001383504,0.00008737302,0.000024531188,0.45883313,0.54022413,0.000078839475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003610906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002259876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97397864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013692837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012157962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81884164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978745839","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070023","title":"Hobbes's Modern Prometheus: A Political Philosophy for an Uncertain Future","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Humanities; Relation (database); Politics; Epistemology; Power (physics); Ethnology; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07818658179183259,"score_gpt":0.3097394167927425,"score_spread":0.2315528350009099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978745839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5352077,0.0008192267,0.0048900126,0.13635162,0.010326696,0.0014008553,0.0014566829,0.000108343,0.30943885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829224,7.86498e-7,0.00075327023,0.005624242,0.0104637,0.000003682298,0.000004792898,0.000023494025,0.00020362812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955147,0.00006247245,0.00065645634,0.00033784634,0.0006363738,0.0027921463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912111,0.0002980741,0.000110691886,0.00026885548,0.00081195374,0.007299317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018169733,0.00024200385,0.0003604987,0.0005081246,0.00076815655,0.00035477782,0.0009078317,0.000114516704,0.00044743912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008248458,0.00018183351,0.0002427099,0.00021408702,0.0032428491,0.0006915968,0.000027727358,0.00044831456,0.000021265812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035254197,0.00008730378,0.000090168825,0.000024486786,0.000012783633,0.00005140971,0.0010327508,6.6041554e-7,0.00004937503,0.9972601,0.00022665047,0.0011290752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046031646,0.0008064492,0.0011867437,0.000059384947,0.00003961683,0.000126189,0.0014922067,0.0001301409,0.0002391401,0.917488,0.07767708,0.00029476764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043606204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007677746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44771472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060188345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018376652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979349333","doi":"10.1080/10848770500335578","title":"Necessitating Justice: Hobbes on Free Will and Punishment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03946381306336874,"score_gpt":0.24925817394707728,"score_spread":0.20979436088370854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979349333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10468795,0.00045209352,0.0000070143337,0.02832786,0.0003348276,0.0001046037,0.000022671837,0.00009232497,0.8659707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822699,0.000045283905,0.00006248914,0.005950533,0.005801957,0.0000022570262,0.0000051271877,0.00002642355,0.005836036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989385,0.00025414798,0.00018964641,0.0001820315,0.00018094934,0.00025472153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992981,0.000221166,0.00004851911,0.00030266648,0.000026630214,0.00010292069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031033394,0.00014620066,0.000110095,0.000025581332,0.0005149899,0.0003508517,0.00030593245,0.000011233172,0.00063009467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009244507,0.00008613297,0.000050552022,0.00002043055,0.00027509697,0.00030118696,0.00015938943,0.00022200281,0.0005154973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001553997,0.00007516138,0.00000397283,0.000018194823,0.000017393988,0.000008568323,0.0056379046,0.000006530559,0.000012220896,0.9717846,0.009367759,0.013052157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004274983,0.0001061679,0.00031881657,0.000057803307,0.00006490586,0.0000044727676,0.0015499131,0.00005857588,0.00003505016,0.031052107,0.9661561,0.00016858752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013647574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010337864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95678836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013187187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039206616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991988842","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905419988","title":"Kant's Critique of Hobbes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Philosophy; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Politics; Conviction; Absolute (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.037417700213186855,"score_gpt":0.2740457777603219,"score_spread":0.23662807754713505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991988842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69458115,0.00052819913,0.00005732403,0.051182773,0.0014062583,0.00009528538,0.00014609529,0.000010785978,0.25199214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498016,0.0000032112498,0.00017269982,0.0025958724,0.001795842,4.1678035e-7,3.5291322e-7,0.000005835455,0.00044559763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981975,0.000036553985,0.00042247176,0.00011472666,0.00035648895,0.00087223476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970587,0.0001229568,0.00007650039,0.00012363374,0.00045427913,0.0021639443],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004916272,0.00009655194,0.00020744411,0.000245602,0.0002390109,0.000116236675,0.00049839844,0.00003467476,0.0025448082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006404734,0.00007222946,0.00012089793,0.00010587848,0.0030943335,0.00042336897,0.000017886854,0.00021847307,0.00004638153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028832922,0.000026265285,0.00013548248,0.000008241681,0.0000047830677,0.000016966294,0.0006103951,0.0000010977791,0.00008035799,0.997797,0.000659424,0.0006570955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043681098,0.0004411378,0.008469366,0.00019083933,0.000049179667,0.00018263864,0.0013275325,0.0000749537,0.006423115,0.4209609,0.56110245,0.00034106965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007884817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009470785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5768361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017686139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011742169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992984494","doi":"10.7202/014964ar","title":"Du matérialisme à l’immatérialisme : le problème âme-corps dans la philosophie clandestine","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Tangence","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.034218817296771266,"score_gpt":0.24525474584470702,"score_spread":0.21103592854793576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992984494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045006864,0.010002664,0.0018583952,0.16528133,0.01081073,0.0010917856,0.001174066,0.0004877097,0.76428646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94479614,0.0007524341,0.00056070095,0.0018973167,0.032533586,0.000034512766,0.00009896941,0.00011691991,0.019209424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959009,0.00034179597,0.001003315,0.000736601,0.00066373125,0.0013536401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975213,0.0006951917,0.00027439717,0.0005950639,0.00022674717,0.00068729173],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011731354,0.0006382473,0.00065069477,0.00014359629,0.00089105737,0.00034389328,0.00069432595,0.00042014287,0.0032335015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022829756,0.0005958171,0.00036416814,0.00022707855,0.0023149205,0.00046271575,0.00025643385,0.0006999965,0.0012853614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019979669,0.0007468352,0.00014390293,0.00021583626,0.00010247632,0.0006867871,0.0036078382,0.000006359978,0.00021679563,0.9884437,0.004322707,0.0013070032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008839584,0.00020599486,0.00060139113,0.00024695945,0.0001397214,0.00019687177,0.00045867026,0.000086380765,0.0002948557,0.30456766,0.6916976,0.00061991176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023558978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042078682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8997893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016357112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015159321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000945969","doi":"10.7202/801219ar","title":"Spinoza et la querelle du panthéisme","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Horizons philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.09793072106517499,"score_gpt":0.2942173299115268,"score_spread":0.19628660884635185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000945969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006479283,0.031860072,0.000028011835,0.25632945,0.0029576034,0.00037976357,0.0007574438,0.00039395562,0.7008144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91225904,0.023940722,0.0002171221,0.008387412,0.020639224,0.00006617726,0.00007057954,0.00015901857,0.03426068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560076,0.0009768314,0.0008648421,0.00082380965,0.00058680295,0.0011469697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974476,0.00071421405,0.00020292567,0.0007172001,0.0002289991,0.00068907154],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048182646,0.00080015446,0.0007768977,0.00021339877,0.00081697776,0.0005409897,0.0005858323,0.0005228653,0.024862586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019598074,0.00075102603,0.0006426681,0.00014345002,0.0020372747,0.0006786037,0.0002861025,0.0011852505,0.0046811514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003298443,0.0015931296,0.000072782015,0.00019309357,0.00019141029,0.00025648845,0.0019540417,0.0000019355664,0.000011963103,0.9342297,0.05689293,0.004569554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043779673,0.00051088055,0.000051733885,0.00027864947,0.00013407266,0.000067514884,0.00009410448,0.0001617871,0.00004972806,0.3927711,0.6048686,0.00057405815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048125623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035239278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9057798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013208589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004053534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001480041","doi":"10.1163/187226310x490052","title":"“ ’What’s Gone and What’s Past Help...’: Oakeshott and Strauss on Historical Explanation”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); History of political thought; Contextualism; Historiography; Political history; Intellectual history; Sociology; Political philosophy; History; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050484888816337815,"score_gpt":0.22595763326237414,"score_spread":0.17547274444603633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001480041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68287325,0.033666953,0.0000044602034,0.17497283,0.051073484,0.00040918996,0.00004250496,0.000039251267,0.056918107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151546,0.0007321295,0.00003312592,0.0015445226,0.004045249,0.0000017268303,0.0000010263997,0.000017775159,0.002108996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986727,0.000081021775,0.00049992074,0.00015025403,0.00042852038,0.00016757158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988459,0.00018273207,0.000404179,0.00021417961,0.00015806973,0.00019496142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027821903,0.00017323614,0.0003398637,0.00013749624,0.00016557975,0.000084547944,0.00025993888,0.00008083032,0.0003923701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006741292,0.00011282299,0.00018784842,0.000022435714,0.00052795,0.0007925152,0.000051549116,0.0006291303,0.000005409762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018233829,0.00040816297,0.0000702505,0.00007673545,0.00008232863,0.000012966267,0.004305525,8.047591e-7,0.0006857596,0.9783834,0.013455182,0.002336498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062335795,0.00041419698,0.0006979031,0.00022879645,0.00008784547,0.000068355694,0.00038733112,0.000004097491,0.00009408784,0.16958569,0.8276362,0.00017212796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001416647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015616291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.814181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019219845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003917055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4600788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002670507","doi":"","title":"The Myth of Primordialism in Cicero's Theory of Jus Gentium","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Cicero; Philosophy; Law; International law; Legal positivism; Natural law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Classics; Comparative law; History","score_opus":0.016383129729657442,"score_gpt":0.22271612617325506,"score_spread":0.20633299644359762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002670507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68185514,0.018434197,0.0013848544,0.026860917,0.0036192753,0.00057109405,0.000047661288,0.00004456902,0.26718226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519265,0.0012214738,0.0000039824636,0.0003761126,0.0009827183,0.0000022900588,0.0000017413695,0.0000124576145,0.0022065856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792963,0.0002888425,0.00042276634,0.000096831216,0.0002330057,0.0010289173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921954,0.00030373695,0.000182505,0.0001584137,0.00008103194,0.0000547871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020382002,0.00010722456,0.00021289203,0.00006215255,0.00017056949,0.000032108648,0.00029868973,0.000039421695,0.00014658835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117463256,0.00006466156,0.00016044642,0.000041233296,0.00033127112,0.000073859235,0.0000362276,0.00081585214,0.000010129211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008423971,0.00007979247,0.000047781075,0.000010132139,0.000062871586,3.108647e-7,0.0008264287,0.000001797641,0.00003308402,0.9906976,0.000072540584,0.008083395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038426957,0.00020345753,0.000117455995,0.000022506394,0.00002593105,0.000010909931,0.0010197724,0.000011443667,0.00011250294,0.8772269,0.12079512,0.000069739945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000625041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002894577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31333748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008890637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021679602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3544517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003493662","doi":"10.7202/015699ar","title":"Introduction : Quand Sophia rencontre Arès","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.050865115117929995,"score_gpt":0.2789932814749954,"score_spread":0.22812816635706543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003493662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08053809,0.06913185,0.0007503626,0.29209426,0.026495533,0.00043757915,0.000623463,0.00021985239,0.52970904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86209035,0.0008597474,0.00021919799,0.001208612,0.03842408,0.000007613904,0.00013002244,0.000031347718,0.09702901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799204,0.00006537581,0.00058016233,0.000403771,0.00047344528,0.00048519284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873847,0.0003945038,0.00014463227,0.00022398555,0.00029313564,0.00020529209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043720144,0.00027827866,0.00024839578,0.00015648418,0.00030701183,0.00021165221,0.0002924888,0.00014613925,0.013341758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002125644,0.00025975166,0.00022651571,0.000059899397,0.0006858707,0.00035437633,0.00009285269,0.00035321453,0.0011332441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010144901,0.00044153485,0.00016971146,0.00007087622,0.00029683896,0.000032817476,0.00086569914,0.0000081385615,0.000036003185,0.95782804,0.034599144,0.005549744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032454563,0.000101476064,0.0008153029,0.00011678281,0.000082378996,0.000028654054,0.00037336996,0.000060629787,0.00022467371,0.16061391,0.83700746,0.00025080587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004909818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011700223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80240834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019752073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004128212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006602336","doi":"10.1177/000842980002900310","title":"Comptes rendus / Reviews of books: Leo Strauss and the American Right Shadia B. Drury New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997. xiii + 239 p","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.1310106039470585,"score_gpt":0.3351574538691039,"score_spread":0.2041468499220454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006602336","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112946145,0.7208665,0.0000015173238,0.018282566,0.0011557421,0.0013531544,0.0001358787,0.0003032334,0.14495528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4998772,0.49259782,0.00020349986,0.0029266463,0.0012614338,0.000088598026,0.0000070000206,0.0000432127,0.0029945644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970084,0.0003398068,0.00096375425,0.00056789647,0.00050037383,0.00061976386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980723,0.00094531226,0.00035135512,0.00040790965,0.000070028924,0.0001530767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000714634,0.00037349344,0.0010051728,0.00009914514,0.00046091224,0.00014748322,0.00065514166,0.000044938748,0.00039717217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002769882,0.00020553976,0.00021506684,0.00024597146,0.009279818,0.00018574724,0.00020377281,0.0002992815,0.000039103943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016635441,0.000097482625,0.00042742403,0.000104982544,0.00008449127,0.00000759528,0.0040716804,0.000011685855,0.000002063201,0.36246523,0.63063866,0.0019223394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005633941,0.00024985225,0.00012774297,0.00033953835,0.00007299975,0.0000063457155,0.0014370009,0.0000147383635,0.000039765026,0.084884584,0.9119839,0.00028010856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039767274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058886793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3869311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030928197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007955954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99341637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007124940","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2011.623888","title":"Practical Paths in Philosophy: Observations on the 1785-6 Spinoza Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Work (physics); Sociology; Social science; Political science; Art history; History; Engineering; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4561879934348054,"score_gpt":0.3053343209689476,"score_spread":0.15085367246585785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007124940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011207871,0.061636116,0.000021508431,0.037931256,0.0019927355,0.00114922,0.000042727923,0.000119734505,0.8959859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74502236,0.043536212,0.0001830132,0.19003007,0.002947856,0.0004896271,0.000050381386,0.00011083649,0.017629646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983025,0.00032344979,0.00050597795,0.00028802088,0.00026187408,0.00031813537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808013,0.0012069354,0.00010401553,0.00038966438,0.00009798834,0.00012127026],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036474166,0.00023142752,0.0003853436,0.0000598564,0.00014898597,0.0000146454895,0.00027700272,0.00005610293,0.043882594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020221658,0.00014622306,0.0002340613,0.00006824413,0.00054511393,0.00014345502,0.000049806884,0.0005394635,0.002497757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003763716,0.0002822808,0.0000039062993,0.00014912011,0.00002022276,0.000014579533,0.0038367738,1.5080968e-8,9.4615507e-7,0.8206848,0.17458728,0.00038245626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013504464,0.00021846389,0.000019743145,0.0010392702,0.000048869293,0.0000050560343,0.00006682997,0.000009733563,0.000004153509,0.035135224,0.96313095,0.00018668277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000094507486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040888768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027782435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089248075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007174447","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2004","title":"Two logics of authority in modern law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Epistemology; Relation (database); Identification (biology); Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Public law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0313217026405304,"score_gpt":0.2253329696495683,"score_spread":0.19401126700903792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007174447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045788236,0.0002759037,0.00023314914,0.0005641539,0.00030825887,0.000044643897,0.00003127453,0.0000106543175,0.9527437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869275,0.00004284179,0.00027949756,0.00013058784,0.00029514128,1.3106939e-8,0.0000018642127,0.0000035843932,0.000553726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999307,0.000106375366,0.00016403035,0.00008508335,0.000173755,0.00016378751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952936,0.000061409,0.00010353471,0.000097901946,0.00009725129,0.00011056375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020921903,0.00007577387,0.00020800784,0.000013090372,0.00021341043,0.000016156466,0.00021007478,0.000040017618,0.0023266536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009756936,0.00007035044,0.00012116036,0.0000061806595,0.00041771424,0.00026942327,0.00005454702,0.00016076145,0.00000485454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060411017,0.00014131538,0.00008121672,0.000014902144,0.000018838742,0.0000065178933,0.0029431272,0.000014747276,0.00002014931,0.9958023,0.00008697739,0.00080950017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015139573,0.00026409695,0.00033082772,0.00008469582,0.000048293678,0.000008545197,0.0026498463,0.0005536448,0.000067666435,0.53534573,0.4589575,0.00017519083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03100783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09559418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007421347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009791444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010356237","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0008","title":"Spinoza and Hume on Religion as a Natural Phenomenon","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Naturalism; Natural (archaeology); Religiosity; Passion; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; History","score_opus":0.10524167508287262,"score_gpt":0.32161529738013,"score_spread":0.21637362229725737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010356237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5761335,0.0455786,2.2101361e-7,0.0073778643,0.0027220633,0.00026401485,0.000023332594,0.00015803406,0.36774242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847772,0.0009457109,0.000009168807,0.0028803088,0.0030326324,0.000018555007,0.000005930913,0.000015261918,0.008315221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990106,0.000041443775,0.00017761011,0.00018384292,0.00018398481,0.0004024671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995391,0.00012161927,0.000040711457,0.00012828918,0.00005250608,0.00011779476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010120103,0.0001881939,0.00024101984,0.000048867172,0.0004048723,0.0000525685,0.00006780747,0.000029613222,0.00030598123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007151795,0.00012880033,0.000069536065,0.000022431195,0.00039239586,0.00015761814,0.000097858574,0.0001719993,0.00049345114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046600646,0.00010250979,0.00014202726,0.000042832784,0.00009643425,0.0000025136098,0.008062538,4.0006032e-8,0.0000119966035,0.9835256,0.007196953,0.0007699779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035896007,0.0003351068,0.0007910963,0.00008278134,0.0000561585,0.000005018092,0.0016878234,0.0000014072023,0.00006675152,0.15097828,0.8453656,0.0002710164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030376556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011920937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8381686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030858166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035490737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.634248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010792735","doi":"10.1080/00071773.2014.915645","title":"The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fordham University; University of Guelph; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011773640891374506,"score_gpt":0.21802811577080045,"score_spread":0.20625447487942594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010792735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8011186,0.0073543913,0.00015432792,0.17393923,0.0049408358,0.00075345516,0.00012649034,0.000013885133,0.011598759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933196,0.0004307638,0.000034428067,0.0027299738,0.0019106761,0.000007222043,5.579463e-7,0.000011456867,0.001555321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986713,0.0002559007,0.00046590352,0.000097458826,0.00022345835,0.00028599464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839985,0.00071190146,0.0004120761,0.00025273935,0.00017066611,0.000052768122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011457383,0.000108209424,0.00029714385,0.0000050510357,0.0015596651,0.00018384324,0.00072814827,0.000056494682,0.000042615047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033014573,0.00004245922,0.0009178586,0.00004097121,0.0029507934,0.00005921171,0.0002407003,0.00038227352,7.791336e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001223565,0.00009322717,0.00021877796,0.000046308745,0.00038287742,2.1749983e-7,0.0036670882,0.000005147524,0.00002267909,0.98576516,0.0052426467,0.0044335276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015401988,0.00010826895,0.0031575663,0.000040423507,0.00012017695,0.00007643658,0.0007611157,0.000092473696,0.000007056063,0.76659626,0.22743243,0.000067580804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001139319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010668212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22218978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022551565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029389785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016883202","doi":"10.7202/008856ar","title":"Le retour de la philosophie politique","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07513906368663542,"score_gpt":0.38207764529273724,"score_spread":0.3069385816061018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016883202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027803725,0.004592732,0.00009839116,0.42609727,0.0013196815,0.00026061118,0.0005384247,0.00020047995,0.56411207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509149,0.0069500916,0.00040404845,0.024137361,0.011253561,0.000057650606,0.00009135728,0.00013502032,0.0060559735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507946,0.001279796,0.00075312896,0.00064756564,0.00043886784,0.001801169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973155,0.00074439205,0.00018867709,0.0005502975,0.00018948838,0.0010116443],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009427284,0.0006644638,0.00069583027,0.0001463977,0.00080656697,0.00042826298,0.00052383495,0.0007887867,0.006193019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037447328,0.00071662065,0.00072400406,0.000107210995,0.0021395956,0.00055341993,0.00016186014,0.0016482364,0.0004629266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041620955,0.0011639205,0.000020514437,0.0002203224,0.00015032614,0.00019234314,0.003453341,0.00002162244,0.000029121567,0.99108315,0.0032752391,0.0003484926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010266958,0.0001631336,0.00023028531,0.0002867527,0.00007696298,0.000104555336,0.0008559199,0.000003955075,0.00044858476,0.6180284,0.3782788,0.0004959469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01469862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016267627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94813454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060729514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010796926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021556084","doi":"10.7202/1029154ar","title":"Aristote, Leo Strauss et le droit naturel","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08601615018791071,"score_gpt":0.30067169376253394,"score_spread":0.21465554357462324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021556084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017824916,0.012151943,0.00035156074,0.43066183,0.006118202,0.00086229196,0.0012643114,0.0005270506,0.5302379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355472,0.0043867254,0.0006178913,0.027933428,0.00877277,0.000095740324,0.00037788093,0.00017275146,0.022095634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357784,0.001984243,0.0010870208,0.0011392407,0.0007957738,0.0014158748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961964,0.0008544129,0.00036033802,0.00091898226,0.000499379,0.001170503],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019936985,0.0009942715,0.0010835725,0.00020423281,0.00040122008,0.00045853457,0.0009427332,0.0013876319,0.00067491556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008556765,0.0009427218,0.000637151,0.00018928718,0.0018942022,0.00089590997,0.00045331035,0.0036612288,0.000811974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032050206,0.0016992735,0.00005829518,0.0001953499,0.0002305728,0.00037664786,0.0015368125,0.00007811425,0.000027223174,0.96786094,0.027228959,0.0003873083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010490831,0.00061660435,0.000100299505,0.00017726953,0.000070459,0.00009955826,0.00025568702,0.000039247043,0.00017204689,0.53233427,0.46444592,0.000639571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027331032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007523595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003280441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009737598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028411964","doi":"10.1017/s0364009411000250","title":"Moira Gatens, ed. Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009, xiv, 239 pp.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Gerontology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06469914669109808,"score_gpt":0.2563758547214624,"score_spread":0.19167670803036432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028411964","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03637425,0.7620123,0.00013344146,0.070323035,0.00742432,0.0040281042,0.005099805,0.00011489141,0.114489876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7284418,0.2577669,0.000056681652,0.0014100992,0.00039459628,0.0000014849385,0.00000740798,0.000018025612,0.011903038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984927,0.00040882095,0.00048739993,0.000094849725,0.00030859862,0.00020763993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702454,0.00063472334,0.0012564262,0.00018031355,0.0008448186,0.00005920408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009959108,0.00014823866,0.0004832734,0.0000268957,0.000518267,0.000016120737,0.00050862605,0.000034042696,0.000049283684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006331539,0.000085894746,0.000446859,0.000078597885,0.00026815265,0.0002130303,0.00016365686,0.00022491685,0.000006855925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003207514,0.00055582117,0.0036734892,0.0013745386,0.004763596,0.0000069801413,0.0229205,0.000011412399,0.000010444234,0.36271095,0.602239,0.0014124818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004653072,0.00016108196,0.0015002177,0.0011301965,0.0015670201,0.000003298431,0.0020515197,0.0000053287927,0.0000358206,0.013733707,0.97921586,0.00013064261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042546082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004384912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6920675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018414087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038929495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3986143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030041592","doi":"10.1590/s0101-31732007000200017","title":"Reflexões sobre a obra que o Sr. Hobbes publicou em inglês, sobre a liberdade, a necessidade e o acaso","year":2007,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Trans/Form/Ação","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Open Text (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Reflex; Medicine; Anesthesia","score_opus":0.05661300812090786,"score_gpt":0.29303258688162803,"score_spread":0.23641957876072017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030041592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3251848,0.015466837,0.0020159082,0.06839378,0.009038799,0.0045689503,0.0042532617,0.0026031442,0.56847453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95416355,0.0018889387,0.00011211037,0.009273392,0.0058863633,0.00008319116,0.00038511705,0.00027415535,0.027933184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157804,0.00028085063,0.0021248236,0.001460455,0.001401241,0.0031546103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958255,0.0006794888,0.00043702396,0.0011178397,0.00034390998,0.0015962034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011115443,0.0015288386,0.0015785658,0.0005854758,0.0015794861,0.001719167,0.001408071,0.0010319208,0.008080915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118752876,0.0012952348,0.0012401334,0.0005648962,0.0010551703,0.0018908711,0.00023139139,0.002328792,0.00122139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011136215,0.0021141532,0.00017226323,0.0012514115,0.00078201364,0.0003488394,0.06740109,0.0000035543458,0.00021095871,0.85728014,0.009155802,0.060166124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035835223,0.0010261408,0.0010163153,0.0010349377,0.0005770916,0.000106808395,0.008860992,0.00021887965,0.00090850756,0.09920736,0.8813124,0.0021470764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031026313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00162585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87215656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023413304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003137462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033741841","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2014.949955","title":"The First Modern Jew: Spinoza and the History of an Image","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art; Image (mathematics); Art history; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024859978019838583,"score_gpt":0.20555961534794773,"score_spread":0.18069963732810915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033741841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030924123,0.0024113962,0.000030029272,0.017815081,0.0009986254,0.0001991401,0.000009295148,0.000056409273,0.9475559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98406225,0.00007550663,0.000006681121,0.0023120432,0.0018781439,0.0000030824574,0.0000022272875,0.000024855652,0.01163522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986486,0.0006407174,0.00021466172,0.000137693,0.0001573886,0.00020092793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893516,0.0003974491,0.000079935,0.00048547567,0.00004278091,0.000059209182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009838735,0.00012154121,0.00013389954,0.000011593593,0.0005077086,0.00015961034,0.00048736154,0.000010105448,0.00013584392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009195874,0.000048163358,0.00008622564,0.000011385052,0.0021640991,0.00017000051,0.00013974636,0.00019438486,0.00011388502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006433063,0.000036116715,0.0000015999731,0.000011869916,0.000018759118,0.0000013805015,0.009530451,8.693422e-7,0.0000089359455,0.9773089,0.006121923,0.0068948483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047724246,0.000050967963,0.00024125505,0.000012698011,0.000030172481,0.0000028465117,0.00018954393,0.0005552751,0.000005238084,0.09093724,0.9074195,0.000077990415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009694376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040675845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016122198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008052849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7973714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034021357","doi":"10.1017/s0008423913000930","title":"Machiavel et la vertu intellectuelle de prudence : étude du chapitre XXV du Prince*","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Humanities; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.020946491022394244,"score_gpt":0.24782467904918928,"score_spread":0.22687818802679505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034021357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58394915,0.0025765952,0.00045355683,0.22299702,0.00394242,0.00032345904,0.00019380933,0.000021023645,0.18554299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98636895,0.00012782034,0.00021249587,0.0074379896,0.0026483398,0.0000047182407,0.000001129376,0.000024095152,0.0031744621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955975,0.0003399999,0.0006687449,0.00033867022,0.00065104995,0.0024040823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918063,0.00072574,0.0001479334,0.00024815908,0.0006789236,0.0063929143],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015676548,0.00030924624,0.0003858649,0.000324443,0.00094504445,0.0010238566,0.0012163175,0.00016235672,0.011432644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023862307,0.0002559354,0.00025222581,0.0002637554,0.0069437637,0.00095811137,0.00012332479,0.00095618,0.0005464454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006573593,0.000119080534,0.0028452673,0.00004431209,0.000022515573,0.00024049499,0.002682603,0.000007302179,0.00002852282,0.9903883,0.0025097772,0.0011052684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056240946,0.00057473814,0.110524826,0.0006500788,0.00009372186,0.0016400507,0.001317207,0.0012260048,0.00026004843,0.40097812,0.48154542,0.00062737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076212704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011729074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5894102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080388325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042145182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037984238","doi":"10.1353/hph.2006.0045","title":"Spinoza's Account of Akrasia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the history of philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology; Happiness; Action (physics); Power (physics); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03796554176682566,"score_gpt":0.21047191725186712,"score_spread":0.17250637548504147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037984238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21738365,0.013387896,0.00001277348,0.016731644,0.017217591,0.0002614949,0.000104309474,0.000022975883,0.73487765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917366,0.000017769049,0.000049551254,0.0004421833,0.003531452,6.486461e-7,8.714154e-7,0.000015090074,0.0042058253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839556,0.000080870144,0.00077734794,0.000086728236,0.00050390215,0.0001556124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849033,0.00007296324,0.0008375542,0.00024578642,0.0002891328,0.000064219304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022557478,0.0001399587,0.00039107064,0.00011540072,0.00006564665,0.0000074866907,0.00047886628,0.00005170877,0.0009283695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004285697,0.000087416985,0.00054439576,0.00003556624,0.00078600214,0.00015355821,0.00005234381,0.00026198573,0.000012180393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102758786,0.00043317486,0.00014963023,0.000107170614,0.00006643444,0.0000055433034,0.00094206305,0.0000146762095,0.0008825917,0.9622326,0.034953125,0.000110255976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037741373,0.00016292956,0.00057347026,0.00013570837,0.00008607223,0.000013342267,0.000024928202,0.0000032697706,0.00030228792,0.41982022,0.57841176,0.000088606466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072516275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005978266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77435297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002033979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010230459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038211718","doi":"10.7202/1026959ar","title":"Le positivisme en droit international : fondement épistémologique d’un paradigme mécaniciste","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.013674435553138216,"score_gpt":0.22171312789261002,"score_spread":0.2080386923394718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038211718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072553076,0.0020367927,0.004240055,0.10239849,0.0045411745,0.0005800316,0.00065915385,0.0002106515,0.81278056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94746673,0.0005829717,0.00049765006,0.0037675747,0.007906159,0.000062252715,0.00019269019,0.00007171456,0.039452255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968058,0.0005515052,0.00071080914,0.0006275354,0.00033628088,0.0009680597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815583,0.00059513317,0.00020459638,0.00048014696,0.00011504924,0.0004492269],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081814703,0.00034154154,0.00054859393,0.0001115784,0.00043251753,0.00028455464,0.0006750582,0.00033895354,0.0029345313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019953177,0.00048539753,0.00045631934,0.00006943374,0.0005157065,0.0002697297,0.00020724346,0.0006999084,0.0008664036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006157791,0.0006425113,0.00023550764,0.00018703219,0.00025397327,0.0001147713,0.0010247012,0.00003532503,0.00006048521,0.9912999,0.0014473723,0.004636844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058871467,0.00023778641,0.0008761468,0.00023559306,0.0000987358,0.00016069331,0.000075721946,0.0013325816,0.00020405727,0.57761407,0.41818306,0.00039287593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006125188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009546318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87491363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005093791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012450469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041384037","doi":"10.1353/ecf.2012.0059","title":"Cosmopolitans, Slaves, and the Global Market in Voltaire's Candide, ou l'optimisme","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Colonialism; Context (archaeology); History; Political science; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.01998555524830719,"score_gpt":0.234021248605599,"score_spread":0.2140356933572918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041384037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14568494,0.046354145,0.000049976145,0.010873287,0.007828612,0.0014041915,0.0005887956,0.00028734075,0.7869287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99061704,0.004114044,0.00003330907,0.0011898282,0.00253826,0.00006111713,0.00007118315,0.000025423462,0.0013497985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976666,0.00030821367,0.00049727934,0.000339368,0.00037526115,0.000813292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899936,0.00021223331,0.00011567501,0.00030624878,0.000055593315,0.00031090045],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005270386,0.00033204423,0.00035946554,0.00007843209,0.00043658953,0.00017284381,0.00020071365,0.00012921776,0.002002012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006743194,0.00022023791,0.00016758661,0.00012068499,0.0006752766,0.00049948064,0.00010619452,0.0003575384,0.00009355581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035347894,0.00031539143,0.009211896,0.000035370533,0.000053547366,0.000004062111,0.0014604524,7.4086563e-7,0.0000011315216,0.9671018,0.02041892,0.0010431969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026604137,0.00006622798,0.012262617,0.00006380305,0.000095650124,0.000023700291,0.0010832915,0.00025963873,0.000011119549,0.025942748,0.9571533,0.00037745215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087337283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016839802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94115907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024368653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022366028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042432827","doi":"10.1353/hph.2012.0068","title":"Eve’s Perfection: Spinoza on Sexual (In)Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the history of philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Virtue; Perfection; Philosophy; Portrait; Politics; Epistemology; Law; History; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.11277914267666672,"score_gpt":0.2615100151486781,"score_spread":0.1487308724720114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042432827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721931,0.004928752,0.0000026449702,0.01015194,0.021096576,0.00018072482,0.000021311198,0.000018000575,0.39140695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98846865,0.000009944329,0.000009219013,0.0015012654,0.006305426,0.0000013357252,4.6685787e-7,0.000013288534,0.0036904367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841565,0.00023259934,0.0005736079,0.000090299145,0.00045655147,0.00023132152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900484,0.00010762615,0.00040729024,0.00023065717,0.00010736153,0.00014220188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056860026,0.00014542376,0.00031599394,0.00012004746,0.00008674421,0.000007466957,0.00029897806,0.00005792091,0.0010048222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008852976,0.000092132716,0.00025332978,0.00003673785,0.00041385833,0.00024070223,0.000041680327,0.0004656268,0.000044583132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025926423,0.0010138548,0.0012150581,0.000100475554,0.00006297418,0.000003272457,0.008147445,0.0000070739775,0.0001728008,0.97517437,0.013600609,0.0002427856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091870286,0.0005273419,0.0036266085,0.00018628796,0.00007601654,0.000030218323,0.00017329228,0.000004427519,0.000084554755,0.11381071,0.8803561,0.00020576795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024614395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030628837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8667555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046056006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006580366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044805581","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905399999","title":"Leo Strauss, Max Weber, And The Scientific Study Of Politics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State (computer science); Sociology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Economic history; Philosophy; Law; History","score_opus":0.043212880990049336,"score_gpt":0.2598220549569399,"score_spread":0.21660917396689056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044805581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96153307,0.00030316843,0.0000031802208,0.014384247,0.0007860648,0.00014791363,0.000049733684,0.000003738214,0.022788888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728805,0.0000018562504,0.000030824467,0.00083874457,0.0010742587,9.494277e-7,3.0653862e-7,0.000006008172,0.0007589749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997723,0.00009758168,0.00050376105,0.0001764563,0.00057152903,0.00092769746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972909,0.00023365144,0.000111296926,0.00021331955,0.0004266428,0.0017241655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012769237,0.00012009426,0.00025837746,0.00025135913,0.0008892273,0.0004522436,0.0006078488,0.00002824731,0.000589314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055385986,0.00007073194,0.0000839821,0.00017111162,0.009741834,0.00034002692,0.000044405206,0.0002792698,0.000014890771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069953753,0.00007925419,0.00038583914,0.00000591643,0.000010872098,0.000009858278,0.0036683916,0.0000016177074,0.0000067948117,0.99528366,0.00023696921,0.00030381797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004474191,0.0012205179,0.035990328,0.0001546772,0.0002605184,0.00027588668,0.024293454,0.00032895518,0.0004179357,0.67621815,0.25580496,0.0005604507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011902542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022618692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31906554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014281254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097211485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99521595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044829412","doi":"10.7202/009562ar","title":"Spinoza et le problème juif de la théodicée","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.23263966682601897,"score_gpt":0.34220988498020916,"score_spread":0.10957021815419019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044829412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023538487,0.047493916,0.000029139603,0.3812621,0.00074187276,0.00029126127,0.00026755754,0.00025740155,0.5673029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347022,0.009571708,0.00043292725,0.021280225,0.014441736,0.000068456335,0.00003568021,0.00011302875,0.019353999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647856,0.0009202295,0.00061303336,0.000579306,0.00041338906,0.0009954988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981831,0.0005253306,0.00015499922,0.00047183433,0.00013616761,0.00052858266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005670441,0.0005549263,0.00054287165,0.00013684249,0.0005975917,0.00049234444,0.00046158073,0.00040129205,0.0072802748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017966768,0.00052396464,0.00043527727,0.00008057222,0.0020412311,0.0005702679,0.00018046873,0.001000519,0.0014021525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026471627,0.0016096411,0.000059383834,0.00022278937,0.00012781066,0.00012240106,0.002525582,0.0000042304814,0.000022705332,0.94532305,0.048325572,0.0016303867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003061107,0.00016949966,0.00005936687,0.00018262702,0.00006276842,0.00003963115,0.000056088717,0.00019933171,0.00011118749,0.49334347,0.50511837,0.00035154476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005573357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015213231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9323484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015005912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007141763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048537747","doi":"10.7202/009568ar","title":"Sens et vérité chez Clauberg et Spinoza","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Hermeneutics; Theology","score_opus":0.29320958990564633,"score_gpt":0.34545302747690626,"score_spread":0.05224343757125993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048537747","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010922534,0.055792414,0.000013183489,0.48335785,0.0027877903,0.00044647127,0.0010309012,0.00033972444,0.44530913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8605309,0.013977169,0.0003856151,0.066814415,0.027362013,0.00003706184,0.00010052447,0.0001763217,0.030615954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957777,0.00080469775,0.00087039504,0.0007993602,0.0006062491,0.0011415455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978819,0.00036174976,0.00021021324,0.00066827534,0.00023673927,0.00064110605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047575327,0.00077440735,0.00076993194,0.00017817278,0.000504984,0.0004041344,0.00046503978,0.00043215582,0.020359777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014122987,0.0007314998,0.0005628908,0.00010249207,0.0013805974,0.0007219675,0.00025022984,0.0011960452,0.0029203345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030551455,0.0012215739,0.000060157745,0.00025066242,0.00020245217,0.00014322207,0.0032899305,0.000008220461,0.000043441232,0.9572337,0.037080985,0.00043505192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040929075,0.00024918994,0.00004420727,0.0002761277,0.00013278019,0.000048921647,0.0000631953,0.00045812322,0.00013344092,0.42385814,0.57375216,0.0005744295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007551313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060047565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016600551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004235875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050377973","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0284","title":"The Idea of Chivalry in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Case of David Hume","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chivalry; Enlightenment; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Ideology; Scottish Enlightenment; Civilization; Novelty; Romance; Age of Enlightenment; Ridiculous; Epistemology; Literature; History; Art; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.08939222186533352,"score_gpt":0.32492915472400846,"score_spread":0.23553693285867494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050377973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72037864,0.027453087,0.000002391843,0.016860927,0.0010152204,0.00065930316,0.0001066935,0.000026828688,0.23349693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969789,0.00073293544,0.0000048900297,0.0006599157,0.0006418726,0.000016635113,0.0000017201497,0.000008690748,0.00095446274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866563,0.00015306717,0.00047679336,0.00013719726,0.00025043648,0.00031686833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793005,0.0015021134,0.000125237,0.0003238549,0.0000911755,0.000027554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00103804,0.00014439525,0.00024772531,0.00003252834,0.0006227478,0.000037714202,0.00033150948,0.000024240533,0.000089245834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016079092,0.000057782967,0.00014035105,0.00006938242,0.0015517971,0.000054596785,0.000111317015,0.00020071864,0.000011994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032058877,0.000116439136,0.0001402032,0.000050271843,0.00012771164,0.0000841838,0.037336357,3.207972e-7,0.000010215087,0.95806205,0.0021046258,0.0019355353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064118434,0.00028151914,0.0034130823,0.00018724569,0.00017114337,0.00010120143,0.10791044,0.000004984377,0.00064325554,0.4420754,0.4443152,0.00025534508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027150952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014078191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5159867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015337173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007947158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57176614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050909628","doi":"10.1558/ccp.v2i2.211","title":"Time, Duration and Eternity in Spinoza","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and Continental Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Eternity; Duration (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Power (physics); Literature; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.04702565201964957,"score_gpt":0.26258843222291495,"score_spread":0.2155627802032654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050909628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9060463,0.00019339615,9.203408e-7,0.0023861423,0.0002245587,0.00016554038,0.000030737097,0.00002659789,0.09092584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979349,0.0000124263515,0.000014840085,0.00055488927,0.00083209726,0.000012625635,0.000029423201,0.000006877506,0.00060195464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920154,0.000043651467,0.00025558993,0.00022891388,0.00009830434,0.0001719975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963653,0.000066825625,0.00005400313,0.00009223158,0.000036083085,0.00011434582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007992494,0.00015800806,0.00023624043,0.000060045473,0.00015194085,0.00009393763,0.00006663432,0.000045679277,0.00059389864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013734466,0.00012903872,0.000039108792,0.00002709981,0.00059978216,0.00021456697,0.00006117717,0.000277493,0.00010515053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081055696,0.00015476305,0.0024227018,0.000021617358,0.000018776933,0.0000064998617,0.0048051532,7.097949e-8,0.002046333,0.9898298,0.00029844523,0.00031479014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030412367,0.00048809763,0.032814626,0.00011691161,0.000048045174,0.000027565211,0.00093989883,0.001120609,0.0015248782,0.773417,0.18560167,0.0008594523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038768987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081747785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21641278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004909348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004745565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6502774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054623593","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778536","title":"Recognizing Rights: Hobbes on the Authority of Mothers and Conquerors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Victory; Law; Sovereignty; Political science; State of nature; Politics; Meaning (existential); Natural law; State (computer science); Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.062192508595868376,"score_gpt":0.2545680955257517,"score_spread":0.19237558692988332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054623593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8390607,0.00014702634,0.000007158106,0.009958195,0.0007123225,0.00007114819,0.000042519914,0.0000031752922,0.14999776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833864,0.0000015864314,0.000039444752,0.0012067592,0.00022904755,4.3782268e-7,9.740839e-8,0.0000037758064,0.00018022023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986776,0.00010183255,0.00026817166,0.00011010184,0.00026223314,0.0005800382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980794,0.0003583605,0.00007249033,0.000103653234,0.00019888111,0.0011872028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008716927,0.00008787727,0.00015598662,0.0001233238,0.00046910407,0.00011400971,0.00025377708,0.000028555178,0.0010986901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010739026,0.00004908142,0.00006172657,0.00008624381,0.0035022974,0.00014875112,0.0000077413915,0.00022914058,0.000009886638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002438653,0.00001203085,0.00013052751,0.0000039928145,0.0000066862435,0.000009326307,0.000871617,2.0387542e-7,0.000015697624,0.9987081,0.00016309263,0.000076238335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001674465,0.00026959833,0.0020898627,0.00010564854,0.00002898023,0.0000552663,0.0021610586,0.000013405873,0.0015378424,0.9060733,0.08735957,0.0001380231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055622957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027312636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15927793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008383456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043917523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055815678","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0651","title":"Hume's Two Definitions: The Procedural Interpretation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Natural kind; Computer science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.35447163198994414,"score_gpt":0.3211626901955673,"score_spread":0.03330894179437682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055815678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035710953,0.0044840006,0.000023721675,0.008607201,0.0017461416,0.0004206904,0.00005879337,0.00023654755,0.94871193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937077,0.00022157199,0.00004643884,0.0028239256,0.00086217216,0.0000952841,0.0000074080017,0.0000118622675,0.0022236009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991976,0.000058475754,0.00021835999,0.00015624729,0.0001388614,0.00023046404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948275,0.00014489175,0.00005170834,0.0001433872,0.00013647655,0.000040786894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000098570796,0.00013864026,0.00015707295,0.000030969797,0.000577025,0.000052757707,0.00014520838,0.000016163705,0.0013544093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012230384,0.00007792661,0.00010190844,0.000030420466,0.0006994752,0.00015186098,0.00008082877,0.00013364595,0.00045105163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023061019,0.00006373376,0.00003962345,0.000024869063,0.00011170093,0.0000020064194,0.047014885,8.353877e-8,0.0000016620331,0.947474,0.0047164406,0.0005279031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025390764,0.00011800214,0.00035360915,0.000075672724,0.00009520184,0.0000045530137,0.012905571,0.000015398757,0.00007177249,0.8773964,0.10852499,0.00018493074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045098666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014557196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017596778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000084268395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058374580","doi":"10.1017/s1479244313000012","title":"PUBLICITY, PRIVACY, AND RELIGIOUS TOLERATION IN HOBBES'S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Worship; Publicity; Law; Public sphere; Coercion (linguistics); Separation of church and state; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04619380730988953,"score_gpt":0.20448239299888965,"score_spread":0.15828858568900012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058374580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86158127,0.0063582524,0.00034796566,0.003972445,0.0011049245,0.0005011686,0.000012247458,0.00017477875,0.12594697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805606,0.0002072617,0.000035439145,0.0028883987,0.0005149872,0.00006107097,0.00001552843,0.00002548821,0.00819574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873483,0.00007926617,0.00032747615,0.0003161063,0.00020362997,0.00033868852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.00021791119,0.0000451533,0.00020179537,0.00008678344,0.00015324568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010064601,0.00019191256,0.00023271168,0.0001584485,0.000109033674,0.00009894591,0.00016787455,0.00008478968,0.0051726406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019467615,0.0001700472,0.00006829544,0.000030362644,0.00034622202,0.00033338004,0.000105958374,0.0002884263,0.00059808843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008688742,0.0006389224,0.00019270227,0.00011593618,0.000043951342,0.000012567145,0.40518922,0.000006746897,0.00045830986,0.2469692,0.33210757,0.014177995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027662396,0.00011603559,0.000071003604,0.000029604269,0.000008293777,0.000005398655,0.00008248398,0.0031128365,0.000035544163,0.09059962,0.90541905,0.00024351872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008774343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022179013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5733115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028723507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040787236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062869291","doi":"10.1163/18750257-02601005","title":"Thomas Hobbes, Heresy, and the Theological Project of Leviathan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hobbes Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Heresy; Toleration; Orthodoxy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Politics; Theology; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.12298078961945108,"score_gpt":0.2944579255538886,"score_spread":0.17147713593443753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062869291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50853056,0.0515577,0.000004313296,0.027261972,0.0008061045,0.0014069466,0.0000683666,0.00014177522,0.4102223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019974,0.0019587604,0.000032751675,0.00077369047,0.00062245794,0.000104019535,0.000002176212,0.0000094637635,0.006296924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890524,0.00017407296,0.00027217678,0.00018892647,0.00019414198,0.0002654692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890333,0.0006634574,0.00007098215,0.000175138,0.00014574859,0.000041318235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021071655,0.00017291539,0.00040095672,0.000029649096,0.0003112608,0.000062555686,0.00015720555,0.00004090359,0.0005349456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002077514,0.000076706194,0.00012338685,0.000032472788,0.0027245458,0.00009754353,0.00022077518,0.00015223102,0.00004998733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040293176,0.000071456416,0.00031024235,0.00006034975,0.00015950607,0.0000012665189,0.008930414,5.8232647e-8,0.00000536951,0.9807655,0.00898281,0.00067269715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010970079,0.00027080506,0.0015196664,0.000079188765,0.00010447971,0.000006237791,0.0137680285,0.000020508834,0.00006436569,0.7325521,0.25029287,0.00022476132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033189513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008748886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48166922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075014145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008196635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065711826","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.679779","title":"Hume and Ancient Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Classics; History; Art","score_opus":0.0851335377081105,"score_gpt":0.24956637360070438,"score_spread":0.1644328358925939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065711826","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053925157,0.44860184,0.0002863298,0.025877014,0.056648348,0.0016410163,0.0009263188,0.00017812042,0.41191587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97957027,0.0007292765,0.00009537027,0.0024485255,0.011310605,0.000022752272,0.000007857435,0.000039078594,0.005776273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849355,0.0000817843,0.00046198466,0.0001629387,0.00033928815,0.00046044117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885255,0.00025024728,0.00022300349,0.00016858507,0.00017546583,0.0003301448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005845007,0.00018433432,0.0003052562,0.00007805489,0.0007034586,0.000067843386,0.00029147012,0.000060218197,0.0009176871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010531219,0.00015132307,0.00032078262,0.000025025138,0.0010951596,0.00038300038,0.00006161109,0.0003759705,0.00002422218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078221834,0.00039762084,0.000029042763,0.000109339744,0.00010350873,0.000005874412,0.002852091,6.146783e-7,0.000037093538,0.9400042,0.05201632,0.0043660332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005571392,0.00012028593,0.00013128482,0.00011622509,0.0000863033,0.0002618224,0.00006956985,0.000007385438,0.0000068866566,0.25934926,0.7391319,0.00016190977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003506278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004688103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9256451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016198821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040506136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065837513","doi":"10.7202/1018604ar","title":"Coleridge’s Ecumenical Spinoza1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Metaphysics; Ambivalence; Denial; Philosophy; Christianity; Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Epistemology; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.02863837462292727,"score_gpt":0.2063656493511135,"score_spread":0.17772727472818625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065837513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5302096,0.0002962134,0.000021385653,0.050046034,0.0042744367,0.0008543802,0.000075239164,0.00021134772,0.41401136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850939,0.000046145735,0.000014917271,0.0061047743,0.0030160716,0.00003940162,0.0000093349045,0.000020835572,0.005654649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987866,0.00008371085,0.0002489263,0.0002531561,0.00024420363,0.00038338886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913764,0.0002912042,0.000048120313,0.00028461113,0.00004482438,0.00019360003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012395564,0.00020732026,0.00021706606,0.000029928584,0.00040401187,0.0003185859,0.00023141883,0.000070904374,0.008371899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042703028,0.000118468226,0.00008898876,0.000027504308,0.00034055993,0.00012959642,0.000085332555,0.00024026253,0.0016356949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011749891,0.000087443936,0.000015270703,0.000008392446,0.000027049136,0.000003755246,0.0010211585,1.1768836e-7,0.00007999851,0.9759021,0.02250357,0.00033944257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003213671,0.00023590453,0.00096082373,0.000034549954,0.000029310202,0.000004333768,0.0001990882,0.00012263078,0.0001407196,0.26695007,0.73078865,0.0002125152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109245026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010789973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70895195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000127680505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009741966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072056999","doi":"10.7202/1025721ar","title":"Nécessité et imputation chez Hobbes","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.17059665292891504,"score_gpt":0.34457263916989866,"score_spread":0.17397598624098362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072056999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009958646,0.018558364,0.0003247689,0.41964877,0.0034087445,0.00034114654,0.00031874655,0.00036404675,0.54707676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93755543,0.0018301838,0.0002895465,0.026091458,0.026363524,0.000036014593,0.00014991304,0.00007302179,0.007610913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968775,0.0007123111,0.00064531417,0.0005818261,0.00045204,0.00073101744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982403,0.00052395934,0.00019756058,0.00039826764,0.00023018505,0.0004097203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006386678,0.0005137882,0.0005338391,0.00013761925,0.00049325393,0.00040739417,0.00035222,0.00027791422,0.0029523913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021486644,0.0004679947,0.000347741,0.000071008035,0.001016795,0.0006485608,0.00014612825,0.000605571,0.0013257897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045184588,0.00044749462,0.00008131197,0.00028126754,0.00009297811,0.000010466765,0.0021216844,0.000009222154,0.000027018192,0.9831653,0.008565791,0.005152242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002701537,0.00022743431,0.00017174007,0.00019002055,0.00007669817,0.0000067133496,0.000038195685,0.0002878003,0.0001873751,0.51612,0.48209727,0.00032660397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042754674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041187242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9275968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009476255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046570807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073783469","doi":"10.3917/rmm.113.0309","title":"Loi restrictive et loi productive dans l'éthique fichtéenne","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de métaphysique et de morale","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05817946431559541,"score_gpt":0.27876746847189143,"score_spread":0.22058800415629604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073783469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21996278,0.006956729,0.0014983087,0.07411723,0.0026523988,0.0015952049,0.001528485,0.00037637187,0.6913125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93040305,0.0022546411,0.0017923914,0.005665517,0.0055532274,0.00018460544,0.00012098433,0.00015508097,0.05387051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582416,0.0013178992,0.00059104414,0.0008179666,0.00025194985,0.0011970099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782413,0.00039197278,0.00025276365,0.0006907934,0.00029705913,0.0005432503],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074782665,0.0005917807,0.00066219567,0.0001444497,0.00034545446,0.00017022625,0.00048514295,0.0004282624,0.0012260512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030253988,0.0006106031,0.00048919144,0.00022773014,0.0010434062,0.0005876721,0.0001960175,0.0015456227,0.00041077714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001782234,0.001437602,0.0007273771,0.00045472718,0.00023906192,0.00030862718,0.03927908,0.000034267116,0.00026746377,0.95106006,0.0055853655,0.00042812098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005416027,0.0006185186,0.009128691,0.0007462168,0.00025791212,0.00012905705,0.0017147122,0.00012861044,0.0039575067,0.5883622,0.39355424,0.0008607463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046727182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010627111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005374164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003735056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078675670","doi":"10.7202/027120ar","title":"L’explicite et l’implicite dans la conception du signe chez Hobbes","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.12773440683776477,"score_gpt":0.3372836194120765,"score_spread":0.20954921257431175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078675670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099289834,0.014042196,0.0011436066,0.18007404,0.0026093468,0.0007001345,0.0008584586,0.0005464729,0.7007359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470201,0.0038006378,0.00015269808,0.015090036,0.02777418,0.000035913687,0.00018178752,0.0001255356,0.005819096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960758,0.00044829462,0.0009836424,0.00075329625,0.0005703043,0.0011686349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728686,0.0010070993,0.00025334928,0.000508538,0.0003130538,0.0006311255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012133375,0.0007287143,0.00068463344,0.00020550277,0.00063140574,0.00041250765,0.00047137018,0.00047327418,0.0022633334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012649351,0.0006866228,0.0004481742,0.00013483348,0.002524344,0.0007765947,0.0002110483,0.0008612918,0.00075593404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017719803,0.0011152078,0.00041336386,0.00019223786,0.00015866214,0.0001700479,0.008324868,0.0000036111014,0.00081978244,0.98243916,0.0047877193,0.0013981513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048319582,0.00043084138,0.0007763593,0.00024799866,0.000096305026,0.00004758661,0.00042969492,0.00002761607,0.0011402466,0.48578897,0.510008,0.0005232303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069199683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013425483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025246694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054197284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080740233","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12149","title":"Spinoza's Thinking Substance and the Necessity of Modes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1842186729777546,"score_gpt":0.3227535020083068,"score_spread":0.13853482903055223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080740233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16003497,0.0036994903,0.000053699783,0.032037716,0.00008828529,0.000321956,0.000025353549,0.000042281004,0.8036963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975859,0.00058805954,0.00005127252,0.00068847876,0.00083658146,0.000022179422,0.0000031343418,0.000008308196,0.00021608494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978902,0.0006386902,0.000266537,0.00031347809,0.00047322258,0.00041788424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975459,0.0018687738,0.00005400866,0.00023632817,0.00014406025,0.0001509374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018096245,0.00014570214,0.00032913964,0.00006617907,0.000787342,0.00013052842,0.00033314005,0.00007383246,0.00031534035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034802617,0.000077085,0.00006243008,0.00008183726,0.0046969936,0.000114040275,0.00023494715,0.00056175824,0.000015301644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026834095,0.000085258565,0.0001241184,0.000068898444,0.000022828584,0.000001006328,0.0034421335,5.7547345e-7,0.000007911152,0.9941663,0.00002457543,0.0017880212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073612604,0.00023361974,0.00015768781,0.000041430034,0.000010209453,0.0000013233619,0.0003124022,0.0001742709,0.000016549338,0.9849872,0.013226654,0.00010250466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006129513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007990314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83755094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010498289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007688813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081728906","doi":"10.1177/0090591709340137","title":"The Radical Hobbes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03198801902196852,"score_gpt":0.2588037024958945,"score_spread":0.226815683473926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081728906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055532106,0.0007112628,0.00007594646,0.063659735,0.0007917322,0.00014286979,0.00003499212,0.00018567235,0.9288446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732623,0.000019671716,0.00001810867,0.013956184,0.0035939494,0.000007893538,0.000005760011,0.000013055902,0.009123089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980633,0.00025249698,0.00028202616,0.00021088835,0.00028606932,0.0009051636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979174,0.0012629842,0.00002365957,0.00030484828,0.000050201965,0.00044088296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041210628,0.0001759164,0.00018143431,0.000027079017,0.00067544193,0.0002044874,0.00034478467,0.00006174055,0.0022331183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041883838,0.00009812608,0.00019389772,0.000029112603,0.0015321516,0.00008864531,0.000042696603,0.00031873412,0.0008621337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005552877,0.00011508184,0.0000032814185,0.0000031309853,0.000017675922,0.0000072233925,0.00025054894,4.51921e-8,0.0000048428446,0.99207395,0.0021225552,0.0053461413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001073542,0.00007193322,0.000070309296,0.00000679732,0.000013371073,0.0000042923043,0.00014761528,0.0000064807246,0.000057295096,0.57247674,0.426946,0.0000917922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008379515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019184233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96770906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035666904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022583698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083055006","doi":"10.7202/027171ar","title":"La causalité adéquate chez Spinoza","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23686053207235905,"score_gpt":0.3654942479042057,"score_spread":0.12863371583184666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083055006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02369711,0.031181145,0.000045951045,0.13413845,0.0035089157,0.00042786667,0.0005263906,0.00040836076,0.8060658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92960036,0.0024074756,0.00014697699,0.014959959,0.037771717,0.000018250777,0.000064897176,0.000121456214,0.014908933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957236,0.00046328543,0.0009924888,0.0007028417,0.00074959133,0.0013682134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974809,0.0007331845,0.00020972472,0.00046183853,0.00034861162,0.0007656825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018762997,0.0006825204,0.00065978727,0.00021416237,0.00051403814,0.00030362525,0.00047977088,0.0004467183,0.0034857527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023523752,0.0006384469,0.00050381426,0.00011800635,0.002233161,0.0004614998,0.00021065316,0.001082701,0.0023321644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013069445,0.00076499925,0.00008872801,0.0003416893,0.00018831936,0.0003000104,0.0024315978,7.363077e-7,0.00005067913,0.97923183,0.01212773,0.0043429756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030984805,0.00018165217,0.0003236739,0.0002594203,0.000087875305,0.000037604274,0.000092521834,0.000008405978,0.0005254335,0.453482,0.544236,0.00045556598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000803444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008852607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9059032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028092644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009042094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086434429","doi":"10.7202/045184ar","title":"« Spinoza et l’islam : un état des lieux »","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Islam; Theology","score_opus":0.37946252516117274,"score_gpt":0.34080992498979135,"score_spread":0.03865260017138139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086434429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025600735,0.082243234,0.000049230188,0.08831903,0.003074122,0.000502199,0.00058716035,0.0004601117,0.7991642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406485,0.018825147,0.0013318971,0.016506243,0.013370728,0.000062430176,0.00006751879,0.00014737625,0.0090401815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963687,0.00048124982,0.0008124961,0.00072604243,0.00044549236,0.0011660322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980242,0.00022645267,0.00019347135,0.00063385774,0.000299099,0.0006229169],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041332887,0.00072633027,0.00066422677,0.00015732764,0.00074826455,0.00023734503,0.0006039668,0.00034266492,0.016832957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013963509,0.00065786164,0.00053853495,0.000100267906,0.0028709709,0.00073484617,0.00029595866,0.00082057307,0.0022286614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010291102,0.0014143707,0.00016057791,0.00032554235,0.00025124,0.0001516945,0.010985636,2.6114586e-7,0.000014377553,0.97247255,0.0033841827,0.010736681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003412556,0.00045743192,0.00058663957,0.00033053395,0.00015179007,0.00002756352,0.00017559997,0.0000096966105,0.00050094724,0.61929905,0.37759432,0.00052518124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080127013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004897089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91504776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012448251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006519237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086715801","doi":"10.1177/000842980103000307","title":"Leo Strauss and the politics of biblical religion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Morality; Faith; Relation (database); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Style (visual arts); Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.1308161117541074,"score_gpt":0.356599773454671,"score_spread":0.22578366170056358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086715801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64045244,0.112348124,0.000006624454,0.031725343,0.0016963815,0.00059614284,0.000035432924,0.0001169443,0.21302254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875339,0.109456,0.000047456033,0.0017113084,0.0005716108,0.000027014134,0.000001413196,0.000011152655,0.0006401299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977099,0.00016451668,0.00066411373,0.00039869643,0.0005238598,0.0005389709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979384,0.0013711253,0.00014747282,0.00027314152,0.00017300232,0.00009684469],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006284732,0.0002447459,0.00050478603,0.00031809445,0.0006229596,0.00009959204,0.00043734728,0.000067478504,0.000032591495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070444035,0.00013681148,0.0001393096,0.000504366,0.008594803,0.00017779012,0.00028852886,0.00024183551,0.000017753186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063853215,0.00007557506,0.0013229408,0.000051344592,0.000037103197,0.000009596474,0.0031450056,0.000008337638,0.0000043332607,0.978108,0.017087324,0.000086615204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094434776,0.00028621586,0.00024879826,0.00022537542,0.00005159686,0.0000310088,0.004719794,0.00003325421,0.00007908479,0.68890476,0.3042148,0.00026092638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012308075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030507962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2892032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003065976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007077077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99410325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094400724","doi":"10.15173/russell.v30i1.2177","title":"Poetic Emotion &lt;em&gt;versus&lt;/em&gt; Truth: Russell’s Preference for Spinoza over Locke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Haute école Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale","keywords":"Empiricism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Normative; Rationalism; Epistemology; Preference; Poetry; Psychology; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.07540173009446934,"score_gpt":0.28412330308798145,"score_spread":0.20872157299351213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094400724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503802,0.011373563,0.00018222886,0.00603094,0.012643757,0.0009898632,0.0001890296,0.00010119473,0.018109221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842429,0.0061154854,0.00019011245,0.0004987065,0.005656539,0.000018145487,0.000012103356,0.00007452916,0.0031914823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961838,0.000250953,0.0013335948,0.00041112406,0.0009051716,0.00091532123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955598,0.0022021292,0.0007007155,0.00049810373,0.0006854082,0.00035385814],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013301424,0.0006532749,0.001056464,0.00020474852,0.0012220436,0.0002702738,0.0007956734,0.00022356366,0.00126378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043593318,0.00037785736,0.0007379528,0.00015261282,0.00084506633,0.000454458,0.00012665612,0.0010162984,0.000114654205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00601899,0.0019232571,0.000094557225,0.0008667953,0.0036185696,0.00004329217,0.05753931,0.000060522132,0.005574073,0.8808503,0.036987964,0.0064223483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008258013,0.0025860935,0.0012892012,0.0005751936,0.0025192692,0.000121543264,0.005521204,0.00020910376,0.0033145186,0.16016339,0.8141765,0.001266009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017742288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034595127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7771885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007364129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095496683","doi":"10.7202/019510ar","title":"Beyond the Letter of His Master’s Thought : C.N.R. McCoy on Medieval Political Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Political philosophy; Reading (process); Philosophy; Revelation; Epistemology; Order (exchange); History of political thought; Classics; Theology; History; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0842541510645783,"score_gpt":0.2717453260138789,"score_spread":0.18749117494930062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095496683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13356136,0.00023908785,0.00006410118,0.22502236,0.0015840313,0.00066199637,0.00030598594,0.00024516252,0.6383159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221794,0.00019743547,0.00007228478,0.068630904,0.00579884,0.00006659725,0.00003488701,0.000060397513,0.0029592684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958042,0.0014299488,0.0007298037,0.0005442594,0.0006311263,0.00086065277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650246,0.0020979384,0.00019302547,0.0007426686,0.0001735002,0.00029038783],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009787993,0.0004966951,0.0006176415,0.00012578318,0.000381286,0.000047767146,0.00074183044,0.0002936441,0.0015193492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042932254,0.00029644187,0.00045179395,0.000082878054,0.0025187798,0.00019395458,0.00022766263,0.0012073345,0.00025615797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003573813,0.00042598863,0.00011170133,0.00004034758,0.00010584093,0.000095662734,0.0018929587,0.0000025405357,0.00008054902,0.98648566,0.01031794,0.00008340442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005320621,0.00059923844,0.000335187,0.000054218617,0.000050755873,0.00006739015,0.0001343144,0.0000051625407,0.0022218088,0.8291273,0.16651952,0.00035304896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000426034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022472603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.788618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074317075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010923615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100266443","doi":"10.1017/s001221731400050x","title":"Leo Strauss and Anglo-American Democracy: A Conservative CritiqueGRANT N. HAVERS DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 2013; 245 pp.; $37.00 (hardback)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02893658451155398,"score_gpt":0.21955078532197042,"score_spread":0.19061420081041644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100266443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8360782,0.0011035881,0.00028034195,0.033829458,0.0011828035,0.0010547448,0.004394896,0.00046701275,0.121608935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947336,0.0008661361,0.000093381655,0.0018464744,0.00077926245,0.000005853135,0.00016333854,0.00003095466,0.0014810566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983027,0.00029906107,0.0002472428,0.00043050922,0.00022062725,0.0004998346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987101,0.0004022453,0.00011383986,0.00026826182,0.00017877301,0.0003267621],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015788882,0.00029209483,0.0004175437,0.00003101783,0.00046884033,0.00011632663,0.00024089152,0.000083372826,0.00028080214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008983263,0.0002555037,0.00014998265,0.00005681355,0.0013834449,0.00024070406,0.00009944104,0.00029818882,0.0000857645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000193373,0.00027227882,0.004845793,0.00007146327,0.0001664933,0.00004730702,0.004292054,0.000004302906,0.000018965871,0.97202975,0.014550733,0.003507463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008037195,0.00027114552,0.0032086424,0.00004611856,0.00009063639,0.000004532925,0.0012708126,0.00019369122,0.000067549365,0.029141044,0.96446604,0.0004360849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076731085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004378515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049022532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038733488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102591225","doi":"10.1177/0090591709345463","title":"Approaching Others: Aristotle on Friendship’s Possibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Democracy; Statement (logic); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0601659445881968,"score_gpt":0.2798299955626103,"score_spread":0.2196640509744135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102591225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04231311,0.00008814061,0.00017664011,0.0077190674,0.00044335917,0.00016804328,0.00008248821,0.00022838435,0.9487808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812102,0.0000010742921,0.000061570514,0.014508139,0.0021648419,0.000007818952,0.000014955408,0.00002192695,0.0020095285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771625,0.00032686035,0.00033644153,0.00041364424,0.00031579658,0.00089102756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834514,0.00062259694,0.000038760347,0.00044082128,0.000044484324,0.0005081866],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005425347,0.00025390688,0.00028601085,0.00006738887,0.00032008704,0.00014334157,0.0002733066,0.00009574559,0.003920683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000406115,0.0001861821,0.00023050317,0.00003660422,0.0005836314,0.00013257535,0.000036993784,0.00046858363,0.0008155303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001244734,0.0005453518,0.000016312199,0.000012260928,0.00001830344,0.0000073233773,0.0010249551,4.261766e-7,0.0000063340362,0.99570084,0.00015028693,0.0023931472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002559959,0.00026748274,0.00032486976,0.000028458135,0.000022832133,0.0000030980855,0.00054434396,0.000027540478,0.00013775389,0.93704647,0.061101526,0.00023961865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033306616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020451862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94677126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096065756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002268523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104568640","doi":"10.7202/014584ar","title":"Sovereignty between Effectiveness and Legitimacy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Power (physics); Popular sovereignty; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Politics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04975691562217301,"score_gpt":0.2760145915562988,"score_spread":0.2262576759341258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104568640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5072901,0.00044605858,0.000057955665,0.00050402223,0.00061437313,0.00023160045,0.00008516251,0.00010190281,0.49066883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968995,0.000015694908,0.000012975756,0.0005068426,0.0020150288,0.00000376311,0.000008959577,0.000017008519,0.000520255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990852,0.00006465003,0.00016719509,0.00021611285,0.00014936828,0.00031749014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991118,0.0005497634,0.000029301244,0.00011441094,0.000039628532,0.00015512708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031643792,0.00013857849,0.00019152272,0.000038387825,0.00024388773,0.00007263337,0.00008216994,0.000030756863,0.0004917947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006630902,0.00011074085,0.00005937643,0.00003093308,0.0002850417,0.000106706095,0.00008001576,0.00015608741,0.0001551618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003479229,0.000052708318,0.006038066,0.00003346608,0.000032579024,0.000019872474,0.0005694327,4.1018698e-8,0.000023235752,0.989568,0.0003876609,0.0032401714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008739197,0.00018191957,0.26292595,0.000045426405,0.000054920893,0.000004588203,0.00014241328,9.66826e-7,0.00061787566,0.18946034,0.5453796,0.00031209947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001963433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006965781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80010766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001558156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000065096624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53848076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114736693","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000098","title":"Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Glory; Ideology; Power (physics); Selfishness; Subversion; Meaning (existential); Anger; Contempt; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.11328378253127572,"score_gpt":0.3062589685639798,"score_spread":0.1929751860327041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114736693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034469668,0.007067416,0.000020462467,0.041904934,0.00043678147,0.00084075716,0.000113905655,0.000082570376,0.9150635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767395,0.0023710555,0.000027623673,0.020350205,0.00020907841,0.000031557054,8.953637e-7,0.000008181695,0.00026185517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978027,0.00020723979,0.000367458,0.00027763253,0.00054440304,0.0008006151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984152,0.0005342869,0.00010725386,0.00044079593,0.00010735264,0.0003951234],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009202094,0.00016511246,0.0003595684,0.00004241724,0.0002555708,0.00002234828,0.0006283313,0.000010037468,0.004964191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072253897,0.00007982384,0.00017309263,0.00022012132,0.00981002,0.00010235962,0.00012315757,0.0001452672,0.0002951264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006262388,0.00015892167,0.000029786523,0.00009982171,0.0000114459135,0.0000013405211,0.00057310285,2.9767309e-9,0.000003547567,0.99329096,0.00030292346,0.005521895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000843072,0.0007052524,0.0011724845,0.0015089797,0.00013877459,0.000004951524,0.0020032146,0.000002648477,0.00072581414,0.7462462,0.24707958,0.00032780328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047654976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012063373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94226986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005168016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007464808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116593380","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709091129","title":"Cloaked in Virtue: Unveiling Leo Strauss and the Rhetoric of American Foreign Policy. By Nicholas Xenos. New York: Routledge, 2007. 168p. $125.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Virtue; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02565373559184473,"score_gpt":0.2682822068594854,"score_spread":0.24262847126764067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116593380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14580652,0.015141401,0.00004228578,0.020486234,0.0003963469,0.0009276217,0.0005303797,0.00016557123,0.81650364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98994917,0.0011226629,0.000048952,0.0028589952,0.0023516286,0.000009087248,0.000015678752,0.00004013856,0.0036037196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746644,0.00022583283,0.0005860448,0.0005017255,0.00040879357,0.0008111462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998343,0.00054207625,0.00019871708,0.00043307486,0.00011262312,0.00037053277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023902021,0.00040779705,0.00065868907,0.00016359118,0.0002899921,0.00015041837,0.00035840736,0.00009900958,0.00033586542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031268885,0.00029262362,0.0002216713,0.0002196075,0.0016178109,0.00017732447,0.000055596334,0.00058791763,0.000028254071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018476555,0.00044820778,0.00006724757,0.000017460301,0.00006309816,0.0000032309151,0.012074857,0.00000673034,0.000024408846,0.9830481,0.0035610956,0.00050079945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003798051,0.0011044962,0.0016221134,0.00012952895,0.000094732575,0.000009080917,0.03274335,0.00014424992,0.00022309183,0.82219917,0.13725737,0.00067475496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029232106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006363426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8441426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002658132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013361951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118843099","doi":"10.7202/016676ar","title":"Hegel et le spinozisme dans les années d’Iéna","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.06480410909558039,"score_gpt":0.30048490355547053,"score_spread":0.23568079445989015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118843099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1068274,0.005762364,0.0016320557,0.31517655,0.0032340942,0.00079937204,0.00068978866,0.0005244019,0.565354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96030575,0.0067890915,0.0007135903,0.015223154,0.008604232,0.000052767933,0.00020130097,0.00017139845,0.00793869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372834,0.001396526,0.0013380059,0.0011377961,0.00063628616,0.0017630223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962417,0.0014479306,0.00037638895,0.00084937166,0.00031293207,0.00077171443],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026158723,0.0010565084,0.0010148946,0.00025755056,0.00089671527,0.00033869714,0.00089398265,0.0011647199,0.0009804723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004823204,0.00096951384,0.0007712967,0.00019619107,0.002804704,0.00071484246,0.00045576453,0.0026209764,0.00050521403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029046444,0.0017360803,0.0003363797,0.0003104187,0.00020411168,0.00055727066,0.00379434,0.00003189233,0.0004656825,0.98828554,0.002819828,0.0011680049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007622924,0.0006308088,0.0015013798,0.0002999497,0.000079438956,0.00012119084,0.00065844075,0.000021608212,0.0018716323,0.5228073,0.47046563,0.000780359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024223884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024097334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8534784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023662158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004092526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129279335","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00015.x","title":"Substance, Attribute, and Mode in Spinoza","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04373140239435835,"score_gpt":0.24455395320364656,"score_spread":0.2008225508092882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129279335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3960142,0.0012774157,0.000028367213,0.016214162,0.0006427705,0.00030784932,0.00023754642,0.00016173055,0.58511597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962389,0.00003210999,0.00003840381,0.0007877062,0.0022538393,0.000021219033,0.000052614374,0.000020106047,0.00055513013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867374,0.000053983527,0.0003457841,0.0003085787,0.0002160508,0.0004018662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994952,0.0000929363,0.000052024854,0.0001964875,0.000049420163,0.00011394557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007734223,0.00021333368,0.00030726547,0.00011142478,0.000156914,0.000089346395,0.00015861027,0.000053463937,0.00031018085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007097498,0.00018612188,0.000080508886,0.00007360689,0.00032197885,0.00019331748,0.00004241059,0.00022463004,0.00010316167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026123054,0.00020893925,0.0015608948,0.000033048145,0.000008734365,0.000017564944,0.0003485612,0.000010858057,0.000012111778,0.99639696,0.0012904166,0.00008577298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065233134,0.000042894644,0.003990599,0.000050758543,0.000010747856,0.0000032792334,0.000022940825,0.00021820658,0.000040974643,0.83854675,0.15616947,0.00025106067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040487605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036060478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6002247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003762691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008272339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.758983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129360525","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070527","title":"Political Emotions: Aristotle and the Symphony of Reason and Emotion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Politics; Power (physics); Rhetoric; Psychology; Emotion work; Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Social psychology; Symphony; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Political science; Law; Art; Psychotherapist; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026524277785035768,"score_gpt":0.2491147945588023,"score_spread":0.22259051677376654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129360525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8667953,0.0007204628,0.00024605825,0.03010908,0.00081383745,0.00013641629,0.000053790092,0.0000064358765,0.101118594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979787,0.0000061955243,0.00009821178,0.0012162632,0.0005982381,2.711467e-7,3.6111993e-7,0.0000046871833,0.000097111464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983119,0.000082269544,0.000384856,0.00012151589,0.00029733576,0.00080217246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970779,0.0006016011,0.00007788258,0.00010692221,0.00026878904,0.0018669297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019261005,0.00009092925,0.0002003392,0.00017817832,0.00039760896,0.00012614735,0.00021406567,0.00004716278,0.00017885488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015987696,0.000055293985,0.000065702174,0.000105981,0.0075443476,0.00020445845,0.000027306633,0.0002501085,0.0000039307592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013714534,0.000014222008,0.00040981988,0.00001009631,0.000005516678,0.000010604998,0.0006869178,4.7899e-8,0.000011400104,0.9982261,0.00003416835,0.00057735696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005918289,0.00015205369,0.046429414,0.000088899156,0.000043563734,0.00023968285,0.0025459263,0.000047998263,0.00015129446,0.9412249,0.00837834,0.000106097024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010782937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003050258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13118334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016437324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044941227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99580437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134534897","doi":"10.5840/symposium20026223","title":"Political Philosophy (Fundamentals of Philosophy)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06276416166364307,"score_gpt":0.24713759652662862,"score_spread":0.18437343486298555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134534897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009227718,0.0003371582,0.0000037129194,0.036234226,0.00095304847,0.00021220198,0.00023867251,0.000111952766,0.9526813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98817825,0.000028790464,0.000035830726,0.002848376,0.0035683794,0.00001774305,0.000021769549,0.000035868074,0.005265007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980295,0.00008039047,0.0005133344,0.0003294435,0.00041466107,0.0006327115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989521,0.00014131365,0.00009294174,0.00036989106,0.00009637762,0.00034739415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000082214116,0.00026355,0.0003816258,0.00011418689,0.00018935495,0.00006105761,0.00030118195,0.00008949012,0.013519702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027650876,0.00021888452,0.0002880059,0.000064915475,0.00083051244,0.00019454163,0.000096208285,0.00022120797,0.0012632803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020178628,0.000512381,0.00007996616,0.00010024977,0.000055133165,0.000009148951,0.0007350777,3.5547401e-7,0.0002830726,0.9951361,0.0029972102,0.000071146955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006422852,0.00033149586,0.000022992159,0.000100381345,0.0000603296,0.000009556209,0.000111150635,0.00006779322,0.0014476015,0.75327873,0.24357879,0.0003488732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029360632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015993352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9789505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049240574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000846422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137001790","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909990679","title":"Freedom and Perfection: German Debates on the State in the Eighteenth Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; Humanities; Philosophy; German; Context (archaeology); Politics; Enlightenment; State (computer science); Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029475120137339456,"score_gpt":0.2509804140629483,"score_spread":0.22150529392560883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137001790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8921641,0.00037974401,0.0000033139847,0.06855265,0.00063167466,0.00011113991,0.000025001522,0.000003987785,0.038128406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990015,0.000021991375,0.000004194342,0.009105136,0.0007827213,7.2225663e-7,2.7659246e-7,0.0000028247941,0.000067164474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850166,0.00010347049,0.00023465366,0.00011946676,0.0003287674,0.0007119734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986734,0.0002850802,0.000043836684,0.000127482,0.00009627424,0.00077392894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075545424,0.00009980584,0.000116185875,0.00014264398,0.0005636375,0.00036486814,0.00044492923,0.000020165417,0.000378235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026452632,0.000047170008,0.00005598769,0.00012824229,0.0017595981,0.0001996039,0.0000093456,0.00035934075,0.000016602919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004565127,0.00002319963,0.000118132746,0.0000014427609,0.0000020116852,0.000036777205,0.0020021896,0.0000013224376,0.000005000883,0.9967911,0.0005893591,0.0004248472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032241887,0.00073760434,0.096412025,0.000107481814,0.000020879332,0.0001909043,0.0018136371,0.00011143475,0.00008307514,0.7780905,0.12188515,0.00022492642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005232865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00441395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21870069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011845802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026913887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79105616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144939262","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000564","title":"The Infinite and the Indeterminate in Spinoza","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Uncountable set; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06335847408517385,"score_gpt":0.22067432282289937,"score_spread":0.15731584873772553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144939262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37383926,0.0010235021,0.0000024694098,0.007483881,0.0012326662,0.00040184308,0.000044610035,0.000046139445,0.61592567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719715,0.00013684857,0.0000026474977,0.0014505293,0.00032151365,0.000023986539,0.000003272676,0.0000061118276,0.00085793645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936664,0.000104883424,0.00015885156,0.0000959059,0.00007355961,0.00020017334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947184,0.00030066745,0.000028384924,0.00013965263,0.000016685706,0.000042757783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024847835,0.00008036979,0.00010361071,0.000020263156,0.00023760682,0.00007273273,0.00015006847,0.000027884258,0.00018519882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007381449,0.000036069796,0.00004420307,0.000020828496,0.00090486,0.000057323698,0.00006546917,0.00016056388,0.00007169004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058037942,0.00002063869,0.0003344188,0.0000034530228,0.000006854293,0.000004424313,0.009589987,1.4489369e-8,2.501695e-7,0.98590106,0.000095195144,0.003985695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063813815,0.000032026695,0.0048132273,0.000012287364,0.0000090459625,0.0000018466421,0.00031660515,0.000025771607,0.000010708323,0.6241216,0.369939,0.00007976193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005314843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072729465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6233579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000046847895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005694895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33339942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149836432","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309002121","title":"QUENTIN SKINNER'S HOBBES AND THE NEO-REPUBLICAN PROJECT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Subject (documents); Politics; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Intellectual history; Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.051794588518913096,"score_gpt":0.22594214427978898,"score_spread":0.17414755576087587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149836432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1213903,0.022138655,0.00062185223,0.025221296,0.0023694455,0.0010633344,0.000055184722,0.0005532205,0.8265867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576369,0.00014937676,0.00002293311,0.0067333826,0.0011028727,0.000025765032,0.0000110070705,0.000019870198,0.034297917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986221,0.00016750209,0.00029606407,0.00031379223,0.00024115064,0.00035936688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990808,0.0004102238,0.00005810861,0.0002685523,0.000078771474,0.00010358422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023774942,0.00021645555,0.0002736771,0.000104910665,0.0003204591,0.00009584011,0.00025532374,0.00005976516,0.003486147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028879647,0.000135474,0.00015455183,0.000034086348,0.0012988785,0.00013446965,0.000057692858,0.0003284235,0.000066385684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023646606,0.00014211894,0.0000014453373,0.000012008708,0.000035898887,0.0000038378053,0.11459469,5.09658e-7,0.00001598327,0.7901866,0.08665148,0.008118989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005228937,0.00013418798,0.000008471901,0.000016339958,0.000030186215,0.000008780796,0.00017082259,0.00072289695,0.000018205958,0.08689544,0.91128516,0.000186628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026696335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011360554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83624655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001444905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006446533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153801880","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300000366","title":"Three Compatible Theories of Desire","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Psychology; World Wide Web; Multimedia; Internet privacy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04149719577649689,"score_gpt":0.22906972907987963,"score_spread":0.18757253330338275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153801880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17975274,0.00054923346,0.00045960094,0.0012195728,0.0009402741,0.00018333613,0.00036275637,0.000105994586,0.8164265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978276,0.0000034716643,0.00005328493,0.00020991174,0.0012761245,0.0000058716855,0.00009022131,0.000009328214,0.00052417594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999371,0.000023485689,0.00019783556,0.00010440281,0.00012349666,0.00017979523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960965,0.0001211244,0.0000437018,0.0001333717,0.000054039516,0.00003812342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006264208,0.000092203816,0.00016846826,0.00003055907,0.000106077125,0.000030492954,0.00011206556,0.000030437206,0.0011831507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016810221,0.00006855123,0.00008537916,0.000025006153,0.0003864664,0.00006386437,0.000026565853,0.00006645333,0.00011044654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014185431,0.00011229314,0.0007106412,0.000019567075,0.000010184794,0.0000018738758,0.00032310313,0.0000015795293,0.00001630282,0.9970274,0.0013844346,0.00037844444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016551354,0.000044723023,0.0013217173,0.000013769755,0.000012766709,4.63493e-7,0.000044640685,0.000015401662,0.00045922518,0.89419186,0.10364356,0.00008633326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007654854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005837504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069264725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000093948875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156049942","doi":"10.7202/009569ar","title":"Spinoza et le problème de l’intentionnalité","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.3288203987580729,"score_gpt":0.3386722916728184,"score_spread":0.00985189291474553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156049942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021259189,0.06316694,0.00009058985,0.55729103,0.001213421,0.00032577632,0.00030047944,0.0002540978,0.37523177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186167,0.008254851,0.00045391815,0.0278642,0.014585534,0.0000705369,0.000051123243,0.000097793156,0.030005354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691325,0.00047670805,0.0006715253,0.00055666215,0.00039712648,0.0009847397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984909,0.00017533831,0.00016158713,0.0004383816,0.00022927004,0.0005045006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004073499,0.00049508375,0.00048438515,0.00013214123,0.0005845922,0.0003690914,0.00040397668,0.00026979053,0.009976719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014917023,0.00048165699,0.000508971,0.00007902212,0.0011651476,0.0006176501,0.00015184924,0.0007286925,0.0018827631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023918883,0.0015654989,0.00005399977,0.00023927483,0.00014729313,0.00006844419,0.0015942187,0.000002895493,0.000024495252,0.95893866,0.035945337,0.0013959461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034671923,0.00017406543,0.00006210631,0.00022388704,0.000063099455,0.000031494506,0.00006635988,0.00034973377,0.000077414945,0.50357175,0.49470752,0.0003258541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007178804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029216159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015389126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045790362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169118977","doi":"10.1111/rati.12058","title":"Hypocrisy and the Nature of Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Notice; Disposition; Consistency (knowledge bases); Epistemology; Psychology; Phenomenon; Inscribed figure; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014673596263842112,"score_gpt":0.22069302299450422,"score_spread":0.2060194267306621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169118977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09636531,0.0020114328,0.00010029848,0.04140725,0.0009569356,0.000274524,0.000043246626,0.00004886553,0.8587921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941987,0.000020439862,0.00001566568,0.0022320743,0.000837578,0.0000035850203,0.0000037497246,0.0000038282737,0.0026844032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996118,0.000055049728,0.00010300438,0.00006593672,0.00008548956,0.00007870138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996193,0.00019640177,0.000025517993,0.00009934259,0.000030535317,0.000028902847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011128602,0.000050487775,0.00009875046,0.000009836986,0.00010592458,0.000032053595,0.00006368044,0.00003035899,0.0004313753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072226576,0.00002621383,0.000038183796,0.000009470018,0.00035236712,0.000038148915,0.00002188771,0.00012268584,0.000020580052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016393835,0.000015341424,0.000013910241,0.000010236699,0.00000892562,8.8276494e-8,0.0010901487,1.9482563e-7,0.000007688808,0.99679,0.0015170377,0.0005300388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039426464,0.000029409328,0.00012522867,0.000007774969,0.000014242888,7.1843783e-7,0.00006798483,0.000142124,0.00013178859,0.39730263,0.6017424,0.000041442876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019957613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014658287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89783335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001712587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003023046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47232568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197224201","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-6893-5_7","title":"The Reverse Achilles in Locke","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.17428922235072747,"score_gpt":0.2793198935335844,"score_spread":0.10503067118285692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197224201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002502591,0.104013756,2.4491552e-8,0.0038675012,0.0023846638,0.0003185175,0.0001141576,0.000005058328,0.8890461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27984136,0.035419475,0.000034486442,0.0015260337,0.00518167,0.000060911076,0.000031446056,0.000112683534,0.6777919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997929,0.000116194366,0.00086607155,0.0003007212,0.0005174413,0.0002705831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980005,0.0008678213,0.00042460932,0.0005363538,0.00013454449,0.000036145942],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004241984,0.00037024185,0.000779849,0.00018116462,0.0001988,0.000003934296,0.0006728272,0.0001395959,0.00037560597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011620186,0.00021981717,0.0003702132,0.000017998273,0.0069264886,0.000046687008,0.00015644744,0.00062900747,0.00004231333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010687631,0.00010874995,0.0000021488459,0.0001891577,0.00017646802,0.00003862796,0.040038664,6.6160715e-7,4.7140105e-7,0.9009994,0.057630435,0.0007083347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022760493,0.00010754965,0.0000030296221,0.0003889842,0.00004694223,0.0000035016203,0.0006992878,2.7120174e-7,8.0108737e-7,0.32899368,0.6693751,0.0001531896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042964202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024135422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6117447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031834893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007282746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202111117","doi":"","title":"Bas C. van Fraassen,Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, 2008, 408 + xiv p.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.3055662268629947,"score_gpt":0.28292017323247987,"score_spread":0.022646053630514862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202111117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038980355,0.002404074,0.000042698914,0.007537223,0.0007932159,0.00042068,0.00042732834,0.000611537,0.9838652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784833,0.0017421462,0.00026824488,0.0027199483,0.0061504203,0.000013586661,0.00008448189,0.00007027014,0.010467574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979228,0.00020698906,0.00036980456,0.0005347361,0.0003480355,0.0006176335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986735,0.00011020157,0.00013902492,0.00052443426,0.00019024573,0.0003625667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014130064,0.0003941444,0.0004042082,0.00008489833,0.00040494773,0.00009589397,0.0005747957,0.00017067743,0.0045611756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000468329,0.00034975196,0.00027357807,0.00003853656,0.0006158864,0.0006287359,0.00022293793,0.0004628528,0.0001501353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001642449,0.00042520804,0.0001429866,0.0000614459,0.000105361556,0.00006480408,0.0014392973,4.064025e-7,0.000008322387,0.968631,0.028739236,0.00021764042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003252908,0.00012307632,0.00010210634,0.000039896095,0.00007242193,0.0000032687183,0.00006537913,0.000018936638,0.0004558089,0.2965214,0.701938,0.0003344563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005763943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057686648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006887954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028635897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209730179","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-9385-1_7","title":"“Nemo non videt”: Intuitive Knowledge and the Question of Spinoza’s Elitism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Elitism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Fragility; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.02721473810269388,"score_gpt":0.2592953063997884,"score_spread":0.2320805682970945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209730179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012850827,0.0014983569,0.000016821798,0.002237573,0.0009616685,0.00038426355,0.00015114612,0.000039180402,0.9945825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2017091,0.0008738805,0.000033366592,0.0007914235,0.003368084,0.000016300908,0.00006102808,0.000047785798,0.79309905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988359,0.00004299779,0.00043207567,0.00028482606,0.00019545939,0.00020874458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989319,0.00031952793,0.00015720168,0.00026928599,0.00020686575,0.00011526335],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024219442,0.00031364989,0.00050565513,0.000077170924,0.00018961377,0.00006845413,0.00017849538,0.0002772623,0.007079049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000455396,0.00018218784,0.00022896579,0.000005576312,0.0020801187,0.00007800556,0.00014353212,0.00069051597,0.0002472316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005596776,0.000028269615,3.1831766e-7,0.00008510301,0.00006626378,0.000001903348,0.0017930539,6.5797114e-9,0.0000055098017,0.9927224,0.000617315,0.004623912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035460418,0.000060298466,0.000011084315,0.00017976272,0.000077510995,0.0000023080263,0.000028291972,0.00000495155,0.00003662164,0.5080715,0.49103016,0.00014293194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019276825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027707065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49041283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018361055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031871215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211931770","doi":"","title":"Hobbes's Constitutional Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Law; Sovereignty; Positive law; Natural law; Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Municipal law; Public law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Private law; Sociology; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.02565982479683619,"score_gpt":0.22799202098369067,"score_spread":0.2023321961868545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211931770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06842795,0.00011669641,0.0001474471,0.002407779,0.00066868024,0.00006649959,0.00006569457,0.000049691138,0.92804956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833794,0.000022008511,0.00021920964,0.00013246461,0.00037524098,8.9830685e-8,0.0000101734195,0.0000033418362,0.015858047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949926,0.000032166852,0.000052536445,0.00012406625,0.00013664264,0.00015534842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995558,0.00008049988,0.000040436546,0.00014668323,0.00006617132,0.000110384775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000093159564,0.000079739526,0.00012353707,0.000013331259,0.0002496229,0.000013824439,0.0001850044,0.000051625233,0.22849223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001925813,0.00008062564,0.00010442197,0.000007217052,0.0016456165,0.00025215832,0.000059525635,0.00013361569,0.00016995434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004579064,0.00007836292,0.00004913611,0.0000096277845,0.000029638793,0.0000051559723,0.004909925,1.6961222e-7,0.00017817781,0.9913186,0.0008379572,0.0025374806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069877546,0.00009338793,0.00932703,0.000023307588,0.00006626356,0.00000531254,0.0085887015,0.000030751802,0.00005912302,0.07118058,0.9096706,0.0002561882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066670924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009510693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.920138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024720519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031670435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224492518","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834.007","title":"Contract Law in the Aristotelian Tradition","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Politics; Political philosophy; Law; Classics; Literature; Epistemology; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06094093640651713,"score_gpt":0.20669191324816366,"score_spread":0.14575097684164653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224492518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008856554,0.00013764449,0.0000053655085,0.00044655948,0.00028563317,0.00035299608,0.00066939794,0.00006150521,0.99795234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110487655,0.000065505556,0.0000016820807,0.0014061779,0.0010911804,0.0000011101871,0.00014108834,0.00002629512,0.8867793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988489,0.00007650502,0.00020940503,0.000314551,0.0002672603,0.0002833932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922407,0.00016159286,0.00010681438,0.0003371916,0.00005789454,0.00011244901],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010407918,0.0002976826,0.00031558183,0.00008681844,0.00030861795,0.000112062844,0.0004396399,0.00021044076,0.00013919424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004164825,0.00024661305,0.00025781317,0.0000034464967,0.00070396985,0.00009777004,0.000053988624,0.00069838605,0.000053567983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060086575,0.00003752861,1.7728246e-7,0.000029036573,0.00004553557,0.00039249886,0.0005038808,2.001433e-7,4.6132152e-7,0.9848845,0.013832403,0.00021367217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043378284,0.000058187212,0.000005416501,0.0001113689,0.00012231966,0.000014422887,0.00011986102,0.0000070782708,0.0000034298776,0.0065530892,0.99227023,0.000300789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010992314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008555303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97843784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105707106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024925419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225250453","doi":"","title":"Waller R. Newell , Ruling Passion: the Erotics of Statecraft in Platonic Political Philosophy . Reviewed by","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Politics; Philosophy; Literature; Law; Art; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05123282519382419,"score_gpt":0.257972796633231,"score_spread":0.20673997143940684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225250453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06450118,0.003904787,0.00007305143,0.13409479,0.0008723977,0.0007701813,0.00015759472,0.000119592485,0.7955064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876765,0.0008531905,0.00003489662,0.006287121,0.000888307,0.000014265733,0.000030337045,0.000023087146,0.004192299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805367,0.00013649132,0.0006302606,0.00024493592,0.000330819,0.0006038362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989857,0.00032725144,0.00007349712,0.00031955272,0.00008378406,0.00021019272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023917417,0.00021430635,0.00035980836,0.00005184012,0.00014325479,0.00005123873,0.00028997412,0.00007723025,0.0068131844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007484029,0.00012242502,0.00017147398,0.0000882416,0.00043326468,0.00011459599,0.000091204754,0.00034682523,0.0002303991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038741615,0.00024636753,0.00023087925,0.000054078286,0.000021733691,0.000008100336,0.00039608355,0.0000018908445,0.0000073569604,0.99280083,0.0058350703,0.0003588902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042251745,0.00008893663,0.000066896086,0.00013354354,0.000019850228,0.000004166897,0.00025139397,0.0001606525,0.000093141825,0.2924633,0.7061105,0.00018511766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019876214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051447227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92317533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034232617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025119693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236503688","doi":"10.1016/j.mce.2009.09.015","title":"Foreward","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Child and Family Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.02082486463562297,"score_gpt":0.22491558925976435,"score_spread":0.20409072462414138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236503688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53540444,0.00510311,0.0016228985,0.018255178,0.00073421537,0.00026465533,0.000022028133,0.00022711961,0.43836635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939537,0.000036137146,0.00004458251,0.0040690443,0.00031680556,0.0000048350616,0.000018096369,0.000009327519,0.0015474852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990667,0.000047787493,0.00015491428,0.00022862146,0.00009667473,0.00040528938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996505,0.00001822563,0.00002246346,0.00016389556,0.000026800488,0.000118165095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000027352024,0.00014128901,0.00017584384,0.0000516093,0.00012876118,0.000047276673,0.00010681158,0.000041557258,0.00074967695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012417625,0.000117944925,0.00009177873,0.000019110983,0.00021465305,0.00004470792,0.00003543119,0.00014740568,0.00010899776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012426012,0.000060321392,0.000015932726,0.000005761446,0.000018015236,0.00016959301,0.00028985846,3.4968673e-7,0.003382902,0.9900418,0.00022868172,0.005774366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042558825,0.00028344625,0.000048295475,0.000006248146,0.000035839807,0.000040639934,0.00008740417,0.00002038735,0.02663246,0.3978566,0.57435197,0.00021112068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015292359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021672129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5921852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006966878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005668272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8208437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238371548","doi":"10.22329/p.v7i2.3825","title":"Response to Readers of &lt;i&gt;Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization&lt;/i&gt;","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.042180363238437234,"score_gpt":0.2653519292344714,"score_spread":0.22317156599603413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238371548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987907,0.006761774,0.00006474893,0.029734902,0.0010967074,0.0005890474,0.00029399947,0.000061692816,0.06260644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407774,0.000060991824,0.000075467,0.0014508425,0.00060556305,0.000009849588,0.0000101544765,0.000015085121,0.0036943012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998769,0.00022456536,0.0003302632,0.00011952881,0.0002395734,0.0003170869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886656,0.00049716287,0.000089510184,0.00024069093,0.00012511978,0.00018096888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043204278,0.00012938789,0.00025067595,0.00007244727,0.00014643012,0.000022607084,0.00015689831,0.000046127323,0.00037036577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034405274,0.000082113635,0.000094181276,0.000064152955,0.0007455056,0.00012017297,0.00007812905,0.0000739627,0.000021009304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037894945,0.00008457559,0.00006946712,0.000041637533,0.000036542984,3.6445124e-7,0.0114839105,0.0000013009644,0.00088486884,0.9848722,0.002008113,0.00013802935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012451403,0.00013330735,0.0016580041,0.00008304342,0.00010099952,0.0000050779954,0.00046459027,0.000036530073,0.0038515707,0.08012924,0.91207975,0.0002127365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002490603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000078569665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016102542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017618806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40552455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247841744","doi":"","title":"Hobbes’s Relational Theory: Beneath Power and Consent","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Sovereignty; Obligation; Fiduciary; Possession (linguistics); Subject (documents); Duty; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.056162385504089515,"score_gpt":0.233489705078748,"score_spread":0.17732731957465847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247841744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30143887,0.007836563,0.00071524293,0.004111752,0.0010551309,0.00018871475,0.000037838512,0.00008036073,0.68453556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871143,0.0009069217,0.000032145206,0.0006897612,0.0007049674,0.0000024263884,0.000004744351,0.000016052982,0.010528647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982593,0.00010224544,0.00021562957,0.00014569824,0.00018605035,0.0010910513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995305,0.00011363527,0.00006835313,0.00008758726,0.00006299456,0.00013692163],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064139854,0.00013541327,0.00014202419,0.000055631615,0.00035080453,0.00005416081,0.00010769387,0.000046668087,0.0031174857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042798074,0.00009862797,0.000097587625,0.000018258874,0.0002810144,0.00015229333,0.00003242237,0.00090808904,0.00010321715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080995225,0.00008266512,0.0002776641,0.0000026590617,0.00010685221,0.0000037604882,0.001983931,6.574491e-8,0.0000031635036,0.99650586,0.0001251954,0.00082720304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036470426,0.0002517264,0.00051719625,0.0000137838715,0.00003665234,0.00017765664,0.0012650592,0.0000016400996,0.000005802017,0.92777866,0.0694558,0.0001313271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023628401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010721806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6856755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012544857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029839782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253594135","doi":"","title":"Robert C. Bartlett , The Idea of Enlightenment: A Post-Mortem Study . Reviewed by","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029001680410109518,"score_gpt":0.2517306204206674,"score_spread":0.22272894001055787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253594135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31041184,0.0057323314,0.000011646694,0.0319069,0.0007056859,0.0014536063,0.00014192615,0.0001237678,0.6495123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699953,0.00024987757,0.000008125917,0.0051798476,0.0005294852,0.000034742217,0.000018858851,0.000016030479,0.023967706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.0001462204,0.0004512642,0.00021577912,0.00034648555,0.00028905162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918437,0.00015537754,0.00007725129,0.00036289095,0.000113958915,0.00010613439],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024898117,0.00017695544,0.00029450245,0.000025807936,0.00020860227,0.00006142091,0.00029101266,0.000028915125,0.012477892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004534375,0.00009064396,0.00016189102,0.000052657895,0.00020181132,0.0000985934,0.00007768178,0.00014054684,0.00027581825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005571779,0.001507601,0.000547502,0.000036629972,0.00015568812,0.000016266677,0.0043337545,1.569523e-7,0.00011947421,0.94767064,0.04234554,0.0032110023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040671523,0.00033814786,0.00023726918,0.000028835804,0.000082087,0.000005401655,0.0016595597,0.000007843156,0.0001003417,0.008276373,0.98870164,0.00015576539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043723494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011341914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014272123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008992388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98842484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256623465","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335828.013.002","title":"Spinoza’s Philosophy of Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Christianity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Philosophy of religion; Relation (database); Religious studies","score_opus":0.0440637700134721,"score_gpt":0.20505078536962065,"score_spread":0.16098701535614857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256623465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007400409,0.0001848236,0.000004602171,0.00016746305,0.00054100703,0.00038033354,0.00043827892,0.00010090688,0.99810857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021481954,0.0002819834,0.000027145297,0.00022899396,0.0013956077,0.0000013524511,0.00012283189,0.000043175387,0.9957507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985856,0.000059210914,0.00030316954,0.00037524142,0.0003434704,0.00033333836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987911,0.00008379134,0.00026643832,0.00045894674,0.00019955913,0.00020015614],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000046487,0.00036334837,0.0005322746,0.00015589387,0.00018745332,0.000052949777,0.0005461757,0.00030458331,0.0005953131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072895655,0.0003499078,0.00040404056,0.0000052909927,0.000752875,0.00012873595,0.0002880621,0.00046878748,0.000018338571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006029644,0.00004509008,3.4584437e-7,0.00026372744,0.00012573993,0.000021392012,0.00046244977,2.9265266e-7,0.0000013329714,0.932101,0.06647817,0.00044013545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033961458,0.00012315027,5.696034e-7,0.00027453538,0.00016165558,0.0000013686739,0.000017361603,0.0000045720144,0.000023618888,0.14066938,0.8580657,0.00031841936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018845109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010325274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011297605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009342982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274947936","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107707115.005","title":"Leo Strauss: The Politics of Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Political Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0726416263924285,"score_gpt":0.2535003446399372,"score_spread":0.1808587182475087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274947936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028595676,0.0009500988,0.000019169367,0.04707269,0.0014345001,0.00055078894,0.0018470711,0.00016870855,0.94792837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6968553,0.000060492035,0.000029118572,0.011827463,0.028637506,0.000028032076,0.0002422268,0.00025078477,0.26206905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947341,0.00014121346,0.0015556205,0.00084343227,0.0012532595,0.0014723637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956114,0.0011286661,0.00044256623,0.0014429092,0.00045729292,0.0009171394],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029539684,0.0010852641,0.0014285428,0.00026390582,0.00058375095,0.00014697194,0.0012280702,0.0006051202,0.0075859237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018100787,0.00075091125,0.0012443018,0.000033899934,0.004246183,0.00011272896,0.0003683566,0.0015944396,0.0017846655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034577406,0.00013491973,0.0000019712274,0.0004621336,0.00030628304,0.000016087808,0.00025929807,4.1018788e-7,0.0000010338339,0.99429655,0.0043282784,0.00015846961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002475289,0.00021538061,0.0000019479348,0.00027607853,0.0002471222,0.000008466675,0.000013202074,0.000005693824,0.000013754491,0.5493673,0.44913837,0.0004651263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007663187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000665013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69682676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014949402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012690328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279200793","doi":"","title":"Erasmus and Voltaire: A Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian review of comparative literature","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Erasmus+; Philosophy; Classics; History; Art; Literature; Art history; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.12743132214637326,"score_gpt":0.3432077770395147,"score_spread":0.21577645489314146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279200793","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.1320863e-8,0.9432386,1.1180296e-7,0.0012639678,0.000536176,0.0016428917,0.0019468282,0.000026222882,0.051345125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000006115789,0.98609096,0.000017199462,0.008935933,0.0014201716,0.00015821698,0.00075770443,0.00005184909,0.0025618637],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970268,0.0005505106,0.0011420987,0.00043256115,0.00025954086,0.0005884788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974897,0.00021739508,0.00046933183,0.0005381712,0.00032491342,0.00096049363],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035704026,0.0007219202,0.0040115016,0.00018330781,0.0001680363,0.00010691402,0.00041010452,0.00020672305,0.0031567116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006154425,0.00047626666,0.0008068569,0.00026014922,0.00041378703,0.00020512947,0.000057235084,0.0008778372,0.000290675],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5295743e-7,0.000019090037,1.197357e-7,0.48530188,0.00012960959,0.000010218473,0.00035602288,1.831375e-10,1.2792655e-9,0.33976772,0.053043045,0.12137172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029261215,0.000021086116,1.720305e-7,0.41851357,0.00102287,0.00003379142,0.0000032388537,3.2431576e-8,1.1166437e-8,0.0006099144,0.57948613,0.0002799487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028605532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011575253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52644306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010678041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038181324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283024960","doi":"","title":"Schelling’s Philosophical Ethnology: History, Mythology and the Question of South America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Metaphysics; Realm; Natural (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0835934075587748,"score_gpt":0.2760810509874641,"score_spread":0.1924876434286893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283024960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23948784,0.009082429,0.000105377585,0.1463252,0.0022561804,0.0007502517,0.000066449116,0.0002885488,0.6016377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943681,0.00011146761,0.00006462333,0.0035021824,0.0006794903,0.00001674223,0.000008862611,0.000016443542,0.0012320946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985376,0.00035789522,0.00033165555,0.00026125213,0.00020856597,0.00030300757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990534,0.0002591415,0.000115791685,0.00026101797,0.00013682144,0.00017383033],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003148359,0.00016822248,0.0003594899,0.00007354595,0.000109942775,0.00001974367,0.00019325761,0.0001091831,0.0004884203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002688052,0.000109253,0.00010007739,0.000047435336,0.0034140532,0.00006173464,0.00008132441,0.0003347668,0.00007940633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003036637,0.000079995705,0.000055316184,0.000016494603,0.00005497362,0.000006137177,0.008192346,0.0000012435975,0.000022285922,0.98967004,0.000947749,0.00064977276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014315199,0.00035828663,0.00008600134,0.000024187197,0.00015533809,0.000017283983,0.0007587054,0.00044901544,0.00003987421,0.66669255,0.32978678,0.00020046772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013144704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021625197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75488025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052326308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062371495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285949231","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511763144.002","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.03432281982382308,"score_gpt":0.19119605874516218,"score_spread":0.15687323892133911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285949231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034428067,0.000061684885,0.000011417185,0.0006277543,0.002131152,0.0002121394,0.00047555324,0.00016845489,0.9962774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00079712144,0.000040978317,0.000018959048,0.00021448574,0.009673228,4.5663052e-7,0.00013428202,0.00004352026,0.989077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887174,0.000022397051,0.00017210605,0.00043158207,0.00022853725,0.00027362595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990475,0.000044447774,0.00011871827,0.00043320376,0.0001536058,0.00020248214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000527384,0.0003188879,0.00031672666,0.000107313695,0.0003489804,0.00008581944,0.00032191447,0.00031158482,0.0007487976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009028697,0.00032609995,0.00026120045,0.000001658684,0.00074269297,0.00008797928,0.0001804065,0.00090133486,0.0002469533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046457422,0.000013846001,3.477556e-8,0.000040202078,0.0000768881,0.000046672587,0.000099962956,3.8026638e-8,0.000015598835,0.92394054,0.07531501,0.00040474028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022851158,0.00004470992,4.0607065e-7,0.000034825174,0.00017252675,0.000007263974,0.000019661922,0.0000018820342,0.00012832801,0.0015545364,0.9974371,0.00037023053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007311481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061149804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.922386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007012871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003128887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288364245","doi":"","title":"The Exclusionary Character of the Early Modern International Community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Referent; International law; Political science; Universality (dynamical systems); Hegelianism; International community; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.021069569559629554,"score_gpt":0.22873740698360132,"score_spread":0.20766783742397177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288364245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9012676,0.0006175968,0.00018540186,0.026129413,0.0021199125,0.00011493427,0.000018407229,0.000020271487,0.069526464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914161,0.00030055144,0.0000017154317,0.0006361455,0.0015943457,0.0000021799758,0.000002399237,0.000010249313,0.0060363165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983181,0.00036028682,0.00024582873,0.000060528415,0.00030632393,0.00070897164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992466,0.0002479802,0.00012992726,0.00021968044,0.00011007664,0.000045746743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011775857,0.00009347169,0.00010008818,0.000020912681,0.0012038667,0.00008526655,0.0007457653,0.00003048592,0.00015366149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008704256,0.00004486969,0.00017030255,0.000019376721,0.00031057856,0.000115222225,0.00015806686,0.0018985857,0.000022194117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003640739,0.000076854165,0.00021485414,0.0000016871207,0.00007025413,8.283221e-8,0.0014818992,9.189812e-7,0.000030706517,0.98857695,0.00008644508,0.009422928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019133522,0.00008858132,0.0013994754,0.000015220591,0.000013115967,0.000021322481,0.00039016185,0.00009792536,0.000016619912,0.8179601,0.17975171,0.00005442487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009184234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037558915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17966527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010685294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012445363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92592907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289845231","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716578","title":"Spinoza and the<i>a priori</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027844585641954116,"score_gpt":0.20407082467760784,"score_spread":0.17622623903565374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289845231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1397138,0.01166675,0.00003323255,0.35209325,0.004732,0.00042033495,0.00013517933,0.000025506932,0.49117994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903326,0.000044272718,0.000034140307,0.005443481,0.0039339373,0.0000012247194,0.0000010644543,0.000012511284,0.00019679475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991232,0.000044649503,0.0003183398,0.000089331785,0.00015988253,0.00026458173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896955,0.00006478173,0.00011368715,0.00011938236,0.00012799106,0.0006046177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021382608,0.00012341634,0.00022948608,0.00011118634,0.000332786,0.00014190962,0.00022326024,0.000037220794,0.00040897075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081914426,0.000074933625,0.00015026561,0.000037773596,0.001120706,0.0001632864,0.000012145812,0.000294763,0.00004291266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029797555,0.000011183465,0.00002938086,0.000010527856,0.000036147143,0.0000645757,0.0024428137,0.0000028398927,0.0000011717124,0.99671435,0.00038945637,0.00026774185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012412048,0.00007998818,0.0000601997,0.000054927597,0.000032402495,0.00007964828,0.00008323669,5.677708e-7,0.000010277859,0.71265775,0.2856203,0.00007950009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017271525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021764843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8506188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056153865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027351122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4477943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296978966","doi":"","title":"Natural Theology as Conscience: RousseauS Democratization of SpinozaS Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Democratization; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Political science; Natural law; Environmental ethics; Theology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Democracy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02501167355953114,"score_gpt":0.28576285148050745,"score_spread":0.2607511779209763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296978966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6178795,0.013958792,0.0015632198,0.09761421,0.003379915,0.0004545189,0.00001816973,0.00014353578,0.26498815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992021,0.0011487436,0.000017013901,0.002184897,0.0009209913,7.32401e-7,0.0000053630497,0.0000071542013,0.0036940656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978161,0.00016466348,0.00032991287,0.00014708319,0.00033024448,0.0012120093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931115,0.00013842396,0.00014722161,0.0001076519,0.00020754313,0.00008800038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009150796,0.00013116276,0.00019462823,0.00008265156,0.00041160104,0.000062400206,0.0002582181,0.00009157062,0.00043865695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027212288,0.00009460189,0.00012031987,0.00006690681,0.00040362804,0.000193415,0.000017499704,0.0021626293,0.0000578469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041479736,0.00006586388,0.000029957819,0.0000034864136,0.000030065554,0.000002398133,0.0014339059,0.000004154164,0.0001547044,0.99609613,0.000053538926,0.002084301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003114655,0.0006672348,0.00008654262,0.000018394234,0.000026985897,0.00018190309,0.0008837636,0.000053754666,0.00018932665,0.98894864,0.00851373,0.00011825994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031761385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015698967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37414154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013887895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084738765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93956685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314578598","doi":"10.18732/h27p45","title":"Mendicants and Medicine: Āyurveda in Jain Monastic Texts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Science in South Asia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Classics; Period (music); Resistance (ecology); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Medical literature; Psychology; History; Literature; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Social science; Art; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04956512214192025,"score_gpt":0.25345660325372266,"score_spread":0.20389148111180241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314578598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74041826,0.0009680354,0.000007169599,0.0009127083,0.0013562916,0.00012966679,0.000009098978,0.000019224211,0.25617954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789387,0.0000056439158,0.000024985477,0.00027500177,0.00017667204,0.0000044910234,8.2559137e-7,0.000005097476,0.0016134063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987495,0.00006158201,0.00028672695,0.00025730356,0.00035743392,0.00028748662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994926,0.000118921984,0.00006953611,0.00013820571,0.00003412831,0.0001466374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079121406,0.00009997654,0.00021612065,0.00027596587,0.00007817667,0.000008899632,0.00023592237,0.000028018721,0.00070971914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033855363,0.0000786346,0.000020178872,0.00009880546,0.005822622,0.00014101589,0.000048129365,0.00013885168,0.000019117942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026285543,0.000101289435,0.0050539644,0.000059342412,0.0000017500829,0.000006487149,0.085627995,0.0000031770667,0.0002214099,0.9049334,0.0006336494,0.00333128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025939038,0.0006521634,0.14097202,0.00075946917,0.000027775179,0.000006768882,0.012256061,0.0020155266,0.00003967296,0.24175787,0.5981684,0.0007503855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002247401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010547912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6631755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016641515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007579898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316889299","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000497","title":"Réfutations de Spinoza divin dans les premières réfutations de Spinoza","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.0951687172575125,"score_gpt":0.2658129416733861,"score_spread":0.1706442244158736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316889299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28781936,0.009201692,0.0060824775,0.022536416,0.0055383644,0.0010538229,0.0057620076,0.00046112004,0.66154474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799766,0.00057902845,0.0009879032,0.0013374169,0.003696541,0.000110293666,0.00032884593,0.00006823234,0.012915156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973168,0.00036036802,0.0005788651,0.00043344812,0.00026029572,0.0010502462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844956,0.00035943603,0.00013684941,0.0003694244,0.00014723626,0.00053749536],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002554726,0.00039924227,0.00036547377,0.0001323753,0.0010561455,0.00020116629,0.00040482305,0.00030115366,0.0049577113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000292869,0.0003932387,0.0003582082,0.00011960041,0.0012274686,0.00031692124,0.0001150775,0.0005327266,0.00084595033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027724238,0.00087998854,0.004294435,0.00013628008,0.0001513469,0.00005636546,0.04318718,0.000025346308,0.00006201036,0.9453331,0.0034006394,0.0024455527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005689615,0.00027856245,0.032959443,0.0002615341,0.00041207197,0.000035140838,0.0026874181,0.00033468055,0.0006303664,0.5445704,0.41662288,0.0006385334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011364315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024235642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6921572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021576705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019834368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318233669","doi":"10.1086/673652","title":": <i> Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The <i>Theologico-Political Treatise</i> </i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Classics; Theology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025420014245973146,"score_gpt":0.2323604838384626,"score_spread":0.20694046959248946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318233669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16902928,0.0014397209,0.000019990808,0.10948063,0.00089554716,0.00088839035,0.00012682333,0.00032063577,0.717799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782706,0.00003966668,0.000023162902,0.015690824,0.0032944065,0.000111277106,0.00001399504,0.000032872693,0.002523224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978303,0.00015751159,0.0004066933,0.00044561023,0.00031343772,0.00084649137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985055,0.00041684462,0.00007743562,0.0005025107,0.00010779898,0.00038994502],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010660391,0.000343752,0.00033232817,0.0000544367,0.0005827579,0.00029397078,0.0003090256,0.000100990925,0.0011265595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004174369,0.00020211446,0.00015110533,0.000048620903,0.0014639937,0.00022982467,0.000029365483,0.00035810302,0.0013502699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145419235,0.00012983901,0.00007630619,0.000027419304,0.00002368964,0.00000659745,0.0009933643,9.988858e-8,0.000015802301,0.9783929,0.018858995,0.001460428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035784696,0.00094258797,0.00036862315,0.000079426856,0.000028203285,0.000016417152,0.00026286274,0.000022603906,0.000051855077,0.7728093,0.2247941,0.0002661245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043317908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015134662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8092413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036603502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001766143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319213665","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000437","title":"Spinoza and German IdealismECKART FÖRSTER, AND YITZHAK Y. MELAMED, eds. Cambridge University Press, 2012; vii + 285 pp.; $100.95 (hardback)","year":2013,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026387332018054675,"score_gpt":0.22851173605123698,"score_spread":0.2021244040331823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319213665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73422915,0.06495818,0.000017452794,0.029474722,0.008235053,0.0034223215,0.008783824,0.0007287383,0.1501506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9087806,0.031946156,0.000032308635,0.0025383856,0.004924376,0.000024207704,0.00060362346,0.00012075949,0.051029593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701893,0.0003081079,0.0005123441,0.00078720605,0.00037290322,0.0010004895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980376,0.00033711942,0.00017650661,0.0004970734,0.00016310209,0.0007886307],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021824217,0.00058149965,0.0007124679,0.00009230694,0.0007402348,0.00054275163,0.0003471333,0.00034271306,0.00087859685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005409463,0.0005365623,0.00021333211,0.00008601353,0.0012586048,0.00082806824,0.00050971826,0.0005497459,0.0010302782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007725463,0.00022306762,0.0001825611,0.00028021287,0.0001957445,0.00008124788,0.0012221986,2.804037e-7,0.000047511334,0.7350598,0.26056528,0.0020648455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014041541,0.00023984077,0.0055828486,0.00016843062,0.00020691605,0.000018952178,0.0003052178,0.00014946585,0.000041240386,0.006913067,0.98425007,0.0007198254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006243977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016830795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72814673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056842553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004186138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321634372","doi":"10.1068/d2902tr","title":"1. Hegel Reads Spinoza","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025666694893232783,"score_gpt":0.22018079493600656,"score_spread":0.19451410004277378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321634372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706453,0.0009998048,0.00002399717,0.005592858,0.00038239246,0.00008687848,0.000026049518,0.00004494289,0.022197766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927278,0.0004076799,0.00040485454,0.0007552194,0.0011377824,0.000004673864,0.000016880978,0.000010969828,0.00453412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993559,0.000014975298,0.00009803621,0.00019992219,0.00011452304,0.00021661435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965084,0.000073185714,0.000027507247,0.00010049684,0.0000037471596,0.00014420161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000111779926,0.0001315406,0.00012654469,0.000008679704,0.00038558233,0.000086200016,0.00004841253,0.00008044707,0.0008123488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007859291,0.000106016385,0.00006575491,0.0000073746464,0.00036101328,0.00008769408,0.000054784367,0.00031019616,0.000036057532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024369458,0.00011326051,0.0070173107,0.000058496098,0.00007873134,0.0000098526,0.031905346,0.0000052683713,0.0010118326,0.9497364,0.00888377,0.0011553616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003017111,0.00006593755,0.0030128756,0.000019918312,0.000029947636,0.000005441157,0.0017112934,0.00027113868,0.00007200328,0.0227265,0.9715522,0.00023105653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022007025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023138705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004416558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026858067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8894649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324172065","doi":"10.7202/1007027ar","title":"[Benedictus de] Spinoza, Oeuvres. I. Premiers Écrits. Édition critique et notes sous la direction de Pierre-François Moreau. Introductions de Filippo Mignini. Traduction par Michelle Beyssade et Joël Ganault. Notes par Michelle Beyssade et Filippo Mignini. Introduction générale à la nouvelle édition des Oeuvres complètes par Pierre-François Moreau. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France (coll. « Épiméthée »), 2009 [1670], 479 p.","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.026523558489129143,"score_gpt":0.26158881799568245,"score_spread":0.23506525950655333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324172065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5761848,0.034587637,0.018275388,0.3362404,0.0060787485,0.004019832,0.007824174,0.0021879948,0.014601044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767683,0.094664834,0.009521318,0.0043798527,0.009610568,0.0006523265,0.0025400517,0.00033198562,0.0015308012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98603845,0.00692903,0.0017246976,0.002172322,0.00079318363,0.0023423394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316543,0.0030177361,0.0008816972,0.0011239173,0.0007668896,0.001044341],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032913643,0.0017266138,0.0015883642,0.0006939719,0.002147376,0.0005313434,0.00094688794,0.0022408392,0.0015002243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002683901,0.0019070986,0.00096129405,0.00060978794,0.0043031615,0.0022903096,0.00031248317,0.003663034,0.00006930209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039162505,0.011322074,0.010198466,0.0034820738,0.002488273,0.0005712453,0.07527229,0.010416508,0.04494946,0.41668946,0.41709024,0.003603689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034990413,0.0026040948,0.02814826,0.0018351886,0.0017033669,0.0012456487,0.003361946,0.0016780219,0.09160559,0.6082685,0.252812,0.0032383162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019584432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028342444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33186054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009966985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010492812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328483916","doi":"10.1017/s147924431400064x","title":"MALCOLM’S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>: HOBBES’S “THING”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Political philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Natural law; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Politics; Subject matter; Intellectual history; Law; Epistemology; Classics; History; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.058571422995557586,"score_gpt":0.20154155256975728,"score_spread":0.1429701295741997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328483916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042449404,0.0035060376,0.006930047,0.0016530366,0.0052063935,0.0002789376,0.00003266643,0.0005451112,0.93939835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9254891,0.000041811265,0.00007079442,0.006022266,0.0026257583,0.000028221064,0.000020377685,0.000055333785,0.0656463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818283,0.00015437769,0.00036811866,0.0004235335,0.0003515818,0.000519574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871373,0.00047674347,0.0000696852,0.00038286077,0.00010499549,0.00025196694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023103111,0.00028991318,0.00033250303,0.00013036719,0.00027409158,0.000055012653,0.0003646833,0.00010514249,0.021047339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003915038,0.00025472237,0.00024172361,0.000026698735,0.000603439,0.00016546965,0.00010188845,0.00041370257,0.003046705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009791486,0.00029430387,0.0000056298472,0.00006304115,0.000054147564,0.000006366434,0.108941056,0.0000056406775,0.00012087868,0.70812994,0.17263986,0.009641204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023700287,0.00018306969,0.0000035458013,0.0000311091,0.000029826055,0.00000508327,0.000045724555,0.0020084393,0.00008054455,0.06380528,0.93324023,0.00033015123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010038491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056484987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8830397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031884725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047006233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328636456","doi":"10.1086/669489","title":"Kisner, Matthew J. <i>Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. 261. $85.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Personal autonomy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07001448226231942,"score_gpt":0.25889457218199013,"score_spread":0.1888800899196707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328636456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027604567,0.003381667,0.000019840534,0.15458414,0.0014793895,0.0011981359,0.00038258717,0.00034390175,0.8110058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86587393,0.0011362185,0.000046226563,0.011145535,0.0027237092,0.000026986598,0.00007110161,0.000059086546,0.118917204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778724,0.00048652923,0.00033491972,0.00044175956,0.00043239552,0.00051716325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978532,0.0008761126,0.00014359837,0.00056149065,0.00021113083,0.00035445922],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005623052,0.00033452347,0.00039001022,0.00003696906,0.0012029802,0.00032834435,0.00048996264,0.0002578063,0.0010524131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016421839,0.00023154065,0.0001903808,0.000034088258,0.0022903883,0.00029304868,0.00025943658,0.0014932777,0.00076599163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005273006,0.000120397846,0.000036750083,0.00006194351,0.00007562179,0.000005972532,0.0013828138,0.0000014480022,0.0000051188636,0.86093885,0.1372587,0.000059639617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015153519,0.00012397049,0.0009870621,0.00007471405,0.00009361751,0.000004276169,0.0004524158,0.00010844489,0.000033426597,0.011452574,0.98479784,0.00035633592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004972926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037701775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8494863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058714348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010542399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332157463","doi":"10.2307/1261672","title":": <i>Hugo Grotius: De imperio summarum potestatum circa sacra</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Brill; History; Index (typography); Classics; Harm; Theology; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023208702060337677,"score_gpt":0.22979691890259885,"score_spread":0.20658821684226117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332157463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17981425,0.004101038,0.00062765117,0.007846066,0.0032325976,0.0006957573,0.00023760737,0.0006417213,0.80280334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991624,0.00004800571,0.000161879,0.0021894064,0.0011269072,0.000041971292,0.000020531123,0.000049567003,0.004737716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997774,0.00018746855,0.00040277294,0.0004194066,0.00029641646,0.0009199449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989079,0.00011266146,0.0000919413,0.00042538354,0.000087477245,0.00037459857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022913753,0.00031767614,0.00034001403,0.00006884352,0.00040980775,0.00024024994,0.00026871648,0.00010321211,0.0024736733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054318338,0.00027620886,0.00022316062,0.000080107864,0.0004354989,0.00029517512,0.000010825988,0.0003520507,0.000666962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024852514,0.00020252714,0.00056870136,0.000055336197,0.0000366614,0.00004294983,0.005122956,5.905302e-7,0.0002312963,0.97703487,0.01524997,0.0014292981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005289953,0.0004937098,0.00025904755,0.00008071118,0.000032371536,0.00003156716,0.00084210816,0.000015318781,0.0003684263,0.1725978,0.82430524,0.00044471837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008918392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009175345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005676116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007175414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339594322","doi":"10.1177/0090591716640471","title":"Book Review: <i>Leo Strauss on the Borders of Judaism, Philosophy, and History</i> , by Jeffrey A. Bernstein","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Judaism; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.03154044214282961,"score_gpt":0.24574529758044317,"score_spread":0.21420485543761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339594322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071663974,0.13520484,0.000020364354,0.20767502,0.0005147736,0.0004870098,0.00057647453,0.0000877473,0.65471715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.736752,0.0061413036,0.0000038743865,0.22898218,0.001227827,0.00005138203,0.000013849054,0.00005509465,0.026772495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979112,0.00038423395,0.0004327812,0.0003219888,0.00034601896,0.00060375896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.0017608812,0.00008327545,0.00042245173,0.00007472198,0.0003363112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042332982,0.00026754948,0.0003908566,0.000035850615,0.00012575106,0.000017897837,0.00029365657,0.00007429156,0.0129431635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038662556,0.0001336916,0.00018876806,0.000020241461,0.0023294494,0.00012041363,0.00008071112,0.0002237811,0.00021745978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040973187,0.00010702266,0.0000018715687,0.00014186726,0.000033397,0.0000016316626,0.00010011303,1.8719069e-9,0.00003008339,0.7374759,0.26170492,0.00036225695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019454701,0.00011365978,0.0000025984236,0.0004539118,0.00004025003,0.0000014823386,0.000023958684,2.3882708e-7,0.00021556819,0.4184796,0.5803473,0.00012691341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002956867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.835877e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73603535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008681116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033186087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98795915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2363313827","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000068","title":"The Erotic Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Materialism; Realm; Political philosophy; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Politics; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.046462375305951875,"score_gpt":0.25417193329683674,"score_spread":0.20770955799088486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2363313827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28762993,0.0007238052,0.00010624797,0.266206,0.0045393934,0.00027948478,0.00032424985,0.000024047416,0.44016683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959704,0.0000049521786,0.000028718892,0.001347905,0.0019026271,0.0000012816477,1.8370399e-7,0.000010413101,0.00073350157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967735,0.00009662496,0.00060905394,0.00017773568,0.0006216655,0.0017214672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496883,0.0008209687,0.00012605613,0.00026589946,0.00059406506,0.0032242083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000843677,0.00015514698,0.0002667141,0.0002051049,0.00067598675,0.00017783199,0.00096069195,0.000049206537,0.00068838656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020395506,0.00007319825,0.00020483682,0.00014082993,0.01005048,0.000352088,0.00004569381,0.00022172861,0.000062490246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009448042,0.000023040806,0.0003610936,0.000008216788,0.000012088135,0.000022708868,0.0001575147,4.618516e-8,0.00011619638,0.9984554,0.00038007912,0.00045416455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027162777,0.00027843856,0.004254102,0.00015115512,0.000028468952,0.000072792034,0.00032996552,0.00000330756,0.0013146505,0.91324264,0.079901926,0.00015092452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029085397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002262071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70834047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030480028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015220933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396110617","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.4","title":"Leo Strauss, <i>Natural Right and History</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Relativism; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Sociology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.039298873465536996,"score_gpt":0.18567430429847223,"score_spread":0.14637543083293525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396110617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021899728,0.0010215112,0.000003360779,0.00025339148,0.0009645651,0.0001995571,0.00042990487,0.000116340074,0.9969895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004451401,0.00037939462,0.000011660255,0.00035378186,0.0010769397,4.4502045e-7,0.000029487408,0.000038555805,0.9936583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988178,0.000026154907,0.00017356582,0.00042131616,0.00023323974,0.00032793064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991914,0.00008351578,0.00012588121,0.00029241075,0.0000805224,0.00022625686],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003810857,0.00037446312,0.00037010747,0.00008761133,0.00023950242,0.00004760831,0.0003031352,0.00021741596,0.0020121408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002727046,0.0003008636,0.00021002711,9.047225e-7,0.0009631299,0.00013260683,0.00022285176,0.0004347952,0.000010073865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074221716,0.000010432298,2.18335e-7,0.000055564207,0.000111644935,0.00008902705,0.00033402935,6.6462524e-9,0.0000020576852,0.9847699,0.012533071,0.0020198377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045047546,0.000054424552,7.037107e-7,0.00014096516,0.00015789318,0.0000055125242,0.00001210133,0.0000012167857,0.000007301562,0.05246273,0.94628847,0.00041823537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031433694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038917005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019334762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003970092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412268032","doi":"","title":"Ordo naturae-ordo politicus et ordo iuridicus en la Filosofía Política de Niccolò Machiavelli","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Strategist; Power (physics); Philosophy; Humanities; Political philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012222792046226881,"score_gpt":0.26503682696681147,"score_spread":0.2528140349205846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412268032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32615617,0.0060010846,0.000025299585,0.117421284,0.002705893,0.001635891,0.0016958033,0.0005775283,0.54378104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573615,0.00087151997,0.00019233157,0.011921096,0.0051622638,0.00012200727,0.00019010014,0.0001943821,0.023984764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378324,0.0010801249,0.0010805187,0.0010031781,0.00083794567,0.0022150162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995282,0.0019203569,0.00025609953,0.0009483875,0.0002873987,0.0013057663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005721761,0.0010123485,0.0009948113,0.00031169425,0.0007426042,0.0018098754,0.0010150515,0.0006558027,0.015823271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004111717,0.0008429983,0.000639514,0.00019661945,0.0011225126,0.0006795126,0.00045080358,0.0016395139,0.0057703154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065422646,0.00090124283,0.0005383566,0.00029453274,0.0003804166,0.000119291624,0.0024701052,0.0000014406946,0.00020092438,0.9775134,0.015564454,0.001950418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011262175,0.0004049116,0.0039247917,0.00031832178,0.00027496967,0.00009101349,0.00051817985,0.00013254485,0.000478666,0.2213047,0.7703911,0.0010346057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003043964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006929378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7562087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025749905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472491776","doi":"10.3138/uram.30.3.178","title":"Materialistic Motionalism or Motional Materialism: Hobbes's Conception of Ultimate Reality and Meaning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10324627503442432,"score_gpt":0.3101418679244548,"score_spread":0.20689559289003048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472491776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88516307,0.00018724329,0.0019524777,0.0028251843,0.002497456,0.00081023533,0.0032909529,0.00038684704,0.10288652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969544,0.00015150268,0.0006316149,0.00031927088,0.0011916864,0.000008397587,0.00038904443,0.000028017474,0.00032608988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977495,0.0001696856,0.00078455696,0.00042424968,0.00037959713,0.000492388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883354,0.0002677412,0.00026118464,0.00019760574,0.00019165203,0.00024830105],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011562633,0.00029899643,0.00050087797,0.00009046608,0.0004655353,0.00020400729,0.00011748742,0.0001378666,0.0013346148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017495448,0.00023733027,0.00008213741,0.0000514646,0.000716953,0.00032838818,0.00011422788,0.00015930235,0.000011455403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038316127,0.00011038734,0.000110329536,0.0004906398,0.000059792874,0.000017133409,0.004905325,0.000007644512,0.0030217955,0.98974484,0.00016048034,0.0009884797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005477096,0.00064311293,0.015620904,0.0016124116,0.0005854487,0.0002925758,0.0042020353,0.002819013,0.009758402,0.88608843,0.071013376,0.0018872202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013103033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017009137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11179129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052108902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021651142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474551991","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.812371","title":"Spinoza on essence and ideal individuation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individuation; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Simple (philosophy); Object (grammar); Ideal (ethics); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.04373868343928102,"score_gpt":0.21872080797610954,"score_spread":0.17498212453682851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474551991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61400133,0.0010336086,0.000025763553,0.09938523,0.0024694095,0.00034606282,0.000113552254,0.000020210455,0.2826048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382234,0.000009785661,0.000026040758,0.0033326626,0.0025995148,0.0000024112605,0.0000034312552,0.0000111532945,0.00019265112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.000041936128,0.00028376226,0.000102604405,0.00018041651,0.0002457889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988563,0.000068114874,0.00011463482,0.000091336035,0.00016766314,0.0007019245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000106580206,0.00011852975,0.0001668555,0.00020498286,0.00024055441,0.0001823835,0.00015247174,0.000044261204,0.0023130046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007916489,0.00009232555,0.00007289265,0.00003456906,0.00029165173,0.00028861954,0.000008234316,0.0002476693,0.00020201606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044624253,0.000015558051,0.00035803136,0.000012030376,0.000021048281,0.000021300748,0.00088639423,0.0000015463858,0.000008054688,0.99462026,0.002810751,0.00124057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002588148,0.00027743948,0.0028917536,0.000098735836,0.000018370072,0.000026321339,0.000103147075,0.000011419495,0.000021452903,0.91492355,0.08123899,0.00013002715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015848221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005330431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.379821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042551426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011502399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475870862","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206088.003.0016","title":"Publishing a Banned Philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Scope (computer science); Classics; History; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07592542596973119,"score_gpt":0.20622355373996654,"score_spread":0.13029812777023536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475870862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011166438,0.00014540166,0.000011260731,0.0010606092,0.00073044345,0.0003071839,0.0006721168,0.0002602412,0.99680156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003045749,0.0002148182,0.00001665594,0.0008074857,0.003056936,9.691748e-7,0.0001704848,0.000073158764,0.99261373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981827,0.00004167492,0.00027987457,0.0005556267,0.00044257526,0.00049756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864674,0.0001118368,0.00020428009,0.0004971374,0.00018988372,0.00035011527],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008521732,0.0004943783,0.0005071808,0.00020696886,0.00050163775,0.00048902346,0.00076043047,0.0004158007,0.0026329188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015363608,0.0005005729,0.00045706896,0.0000049890073,0.00059792446,0.00048363503,0.00042137632,0.00091450854,0.00002093819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102749946,0.000029645998,3.9268915e-7,0.000076785655,0.00018878463,0.00021919393,0.00058517716,3.3954822e-7,2.3081388e-7,0.9859694,0.0109573575,0.0018699239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042930254,0.000067133114,2.7684158e-7,0.00018517542,0.00015611021,0.00000449563,0.000036072888,0.00000563314,0.0000019423778,0.2250079,0.7736572,0.0004487465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008765146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036812293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76269984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013495801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004743421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476773167","doi":"10.2307/2586389","title":"Machiavelli's Romans: Liberty and Greatness in <i>The Discourses on Livy</i>. By J. Patrick Coby. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999. 267p. $65.00 cloth, $23.95 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Greatness; Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Literature; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019888506426649872,"score_gpt":0.2791265363852186,"score_spread":0.25923802995856876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476773167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07533842,0.21991807,0.000006780294,0.14073697,0.00055218505,0.0023159666,0.0007589288,0.0002670583,0.5601056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83009905,0.09895533,0.000027303095,0.06805099,0.0008255455,0.00009930915,0.00003714541,0.000037046917,0.0018683092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957665,0.000395186,0.00062313175,0.00075578137,0.0008604043,0.0015989525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979188,0.00064379134,0.000106982196,0.0005399132,0.00004938062,0.0007411215],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792354,0.00041767504,0.0007177349,0.0000660341,0.000576757,0.00031168075,0.00080660346,0.000044100034,0.0019474133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000188548,0.0002456658,0.00018762889,0.0004873202,0.005654135,0.00038395505,0.0000887746,0.00046315408,0.00036865042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015660598,0.00027636558,0.00013274228,0.00021154279,0.000008471618,0.000018031666,0.0003755911,9.813759e-8,0.000003719284,0.9458026,0.010474195,0.042680934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019960388,0.00041037728,0.0003936385,0.0011069762,0.00006853824,0.00003080485,0.00035248484,0.000016726855,0.000016810924,0.03013016,0.9668252,0.00044870464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057759825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013103095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011565687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012140879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481345471","doi":"10.1057/9781403978592_2","title":"Esoteric Philosophy and Ancient Wisdom","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Key (lock); Political philosophy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.040313222612537135,"score_gpt":0.2299373053545626,"score_spread":0.18962408274202547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481345471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002737594,0.0035803283,0.0000027511667,0.00079829077,0.0007935582,0.00045702668,0.0006145152,0.00017126044,0.9933085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8147999,0.00030828564,0.0000558324,0.004921803,0.008290893,0.000025691574,0.00013997484,0.00015515932,0.17130247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997479,0.000036069752,0.00060207845,0.00074769947,0.00049626303,0.0006388484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855393,0.0001088196,0.00020966584,0.0005459207,0.000113398564,0.00046823974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011416347,0.0007561026,0.00074104045,0.00020424482,0.00034772095,0.00018383417,0.00031374223,0.0003080834,0.0047863056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011958815,0.00063016475,0.0003656164,0.00000621173,0.0011677017,0.000005625746,0.00024301642,0.0005878359,0.0006304082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040933795,0.0000046387977,0.000004443476,0.000112276226,0.0001290725,0.000056427438,0.00087099086,1.1436101e-7,0.0000052552846,0.9905792,0.00027081597,0.007925871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002548024,0.00010071833,0.0000124268145,0.0001266505,0.000083796775,0.00001874608,0.000008054394,0.0000055998644,0.0000058124574,0.52762556,0.4713124,0.00044541995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032578482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053597145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82200605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007288981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034952714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484168493","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498084.005","title":"Of Human Freedom and Necessity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Philosophy; Position (finance); Epistemology","score_opus":0.047233303428821434,"score_gpt":0.2131249194646082,"score_spread":0.16589161603578678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484168493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008179764,0.00023900102,0.0000033358247,0.00009925273,0.00021162844,0.00018040436,0.00078811747,0.00006249001,0.9975978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036022957,0.000063205356,0.000012372409,0.00009183307,0.000982874,2.189218e-7,0.000050890812,0.000027704025,0.96274793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899304,0.000028222583,0.00021921944,0.0003284908,0.00021007765,0.00022097056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999156,0.00006332511,0.00017457233,0.00030066996,0.00011721634,0.00018824113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000052223637,0.0002905932,0.0004439179,0.00010124638,0.00027036745,0.000041617666,0.00028471235,0.00020347345,0.00016075477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003943785,0.00029598575,0.00019654458,0.0000016977057,0.001148121,0.00008063577,0.0002851462,0.00036913448,0.000008853997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003546748,0.00002239399,0.0000013966877,0.00011483737,0.00010565322,0.000031249605,0.00021263707,9.3301935e-8,0.000009325655,0.9903183,0.008766892,0.00038172828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004220245,0.000082195365,0.000009769454,0.00012787979,0.00021407568,0.0000026605676,0.000037156962,0.0000049062282,0.000048600257,0.0011442858,0.9975935,0.00031290998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021725176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016647256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98917407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045208864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020474243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485108717","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_33","title":"Grading Basic Distinctions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1404751770227395,"score_gpt":0.2705116743120611,"score_spread":0.13003649728932157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485108717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000038909216,0.00024952617,0.0000761599,0.0011707975,0.0016039812,0.00012868685,0.00016648747,0.00018597709,0.9964145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009052782,0.00004710422,0.000030670086,0.0015982816,0.005246484,0.0000036308568,0.00012439405,0.000055661367,0.983841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988099,0.000006485875,0.00032907396,0.000289244,0.00025384748,0.00031148674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992756,0.00014904392,0.00006794767,0.00023743618,0.00007074725,0.00019918193],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000774252,0.0002958284,0.00028484964,0.00011783314,0.00031575473,0.000101558864,0.00014750198,0.00015769788,0.099686824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012927452,0.00022924635,0.00029430506,0.000005993048,0.0003757578,0.00006252964,0.00005754615,0.00043926743,0.0032969585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005899356,0.0000228147,6.7370894e-7,0.000023020313,0.000053510143,0.000014621502,0.00013782653,3.094909e-8,1.1393431e-7,0.98600733,0.01195097,0.0017831816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050657603,0.000022753102,9.911558e-7,0.000041020296,0.00004498012,0.0000028245315,0.00001174792,0.0000017033105,9.3415565e-7,0.42792797,0.57171303,0.00018135697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035022116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000143349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55976206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000518899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000141311675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485727393","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.001.0001","title":"The Riddle of Hume's Treatise","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Orthodoxy; Philosophy; Naturalism; Schism; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.05187080982651297,"score_gpt":0.21270371358760481,"score_spread":0.16083290376109183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485727393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014113543,0.0019780973,9.600423e-7,0.0010593082,0.0006012529,0.00015935503,0.00020471253,0.00004502027,0.99593717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018867519,0.0011730873,0.000006595458,0.0003973918,0.0025984854,0.000009362049,0.00007034184,0.000029825631,0.9938282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888694,0.000032893044,0.0003680431,0.0001771487,0.0002872066,0.0002477545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899226,0.0003707596,0.000114821516,0.0003365742,0.00009357482,0.000092000795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005388672,0.00022315573,0.0003298262,0.00003401774,0.00035447575,0.000047857655,0.0002857719,0.00011253343,0.0060686376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020884905,0.00011799801,0.0003006333,0.000008365025,0.0009949302,0.000038121965,0.00006333771,0.00025168687,0.0005171925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010453476,0.00003418466,4.1160942e-7,0.000022658112,0.000058314377,0.0000042117863,0.00038293083,3.04914e-8,8.477699e-8,0.78420573,0.21418104,0.001099959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000940037,0.000057625726,0.0000014149878,0.00003852141,0.00003402832,0.000002189518,0.000022356751,0.0000012557416,0.0000072801326,0.27512947,0.724498,0.00011389882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005357662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008925852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5103169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034677392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008266686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99483997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489215326","doi":"10.1057/9781403907691_8","title":"Afterword: Toward the Future","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.045715811031147996,"score_gpt":0.22397772178299918,"score_spread":0.1782619107518512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489215326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012810949,0.0046417955,0.0000023806306,0.0043785637,0.0025998824,0.00050596776,0.0005849986,0.00015599273,0.9871176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81021243,0.00037204666,0.000010632945,0.0031255397,0.015986668,0.00003576277,0.00007408492,0.00011980611,0.17006305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757713,0.00005319599,0.00056284753,0.00057616783,0.0005852046,0.0006454551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843705,0.000158059,0.00019765347,0.00079775177,0.00012426535,0.0002852105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011635675,0.00074562617,0.0006224262,0.00011082813,0.00039186762,0.0002447089,0.00067389687,0.0003555696,0.029905384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000880303,0.000460723,0.00067936874,0.000006668567,0.00080313504,9.487744e-7,0.00022229679,0.00089960074,0.00249685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026879898,9.37384e-7,0.000002116087,0.00006553528,0.00018285005,0.00006005753,0.003027109,3.9115672e-8,3.8800425e-7,0.98833656,0.0010536328,0.0072438936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012813744,0.000052580846,0.0000048376564,0.00006883346,0.00009282956,0.000010750903,0.00007826928,0.0000017778673,0.0000023466132,0.52428204,0.4749314,0.00034619213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023493689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007936059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81705457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056886933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022689412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491045779","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511676246.004","title":"Tolstoy's peaceable kingdom","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.05341782389349389,"score_gpt":0.21743137976741692,"score_spread":0.16401355587392302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491045779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018295661,0.0002228043,0.000026953785,0.00033725955,0.00214227,0.00060610357,0.0020177118,0.0002455835,0.9925718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051289316,0.00020196466,0.00005617327,0.00047609062,0.0031671124,0.0000014482838,0.00016674837,0.00011647111,0.94452465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699897,0.00009912188,0.00046171673,0.0009711427,0.0005774219,0.00089163875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974349,0.0002518779,0.0003385963,0.00095553364,0.00033241868,0.0006866606],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014662504,0.00090439606,0.0009192812,0.00023614014,0.0012971472,0.0004902689,0.0010061697,0.0008870547,0.0006486357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025941259,0.00094605505,0.00078548456,0.00000592437,0.0018904115,0.00020800525,0.00074418634,0.0020523728,0.00039372488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021452137,0.000081323065,0.0000033705694,0.00024481062,0.000319104,0.00037839747,0.00020724146,3.1190177e-7,0.000073963885,0.9911456,0.007004694,0.0003266758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092278374,0.00015184567,0.0000113371525,0.0003917157,0.0006432685,0.000023035283,0.0000775824,0.000017570057,0.00031989662,0.0005728556,0.9957646,0.0011035117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009155616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008463373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99057275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001507805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009792742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496965207","doi":"10.1522/030140085","title":"Sur la theorie kantienne de la liberte","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.021603717197062475,"score_gpt":0.23527487301550246,"score_spread":0.21367115581843998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496965207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005258359,0.004155003,0.000056313187,0.0042450507,0.0013961487,0.00025124097,0.00055210665,0.00018763621,0.98863065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022836968,0.005668642,0.0001382119,0.0030166958,0.0079983855,0.000021119828,0.00017091048,0.00012628069,0.9600228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662983,0.0007732723,0.0006178367,0.0005637844,0.00041325623,0.0010019874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950421,0.003639149,0.00014203374,0.00046643123,0.00015152623,0.0005587775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043117424,0.0007066809,0.00076355156,0.00011253572,0.0006690277,0.00035308753,0.0005068757,0.00083609537,0.020293124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001862885,0.00055927446,0.0006997441,0.000040962834,0.0045183636,0.00023033476,0.00020293242,0.0012746295,0.002008742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049189046,0.0004814941,0.000023427458,0.00018949386,0.00022778887,0.0003542506,0.0008747038,8.856103e-7,0.0000012691459,0.90057486,0.09540172,0.0018208921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033366922,0.00009050491,0.00003611099,0.00019966302,0.000113722715,0.00011451744,0.00002439091,0.0000187025,0.000010978611,0.4125617,0.5860585,0.00043749835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051294174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031149593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4906568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017154372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003914698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498578434","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498084.009","title":"The Vocation of Humankind Revisited, 1800: Conclusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Contemplation; Action (physics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Physics","score_opus":0.041778666799012466,"score_gpt":0.2165671200867183,"score_spread":0.17478845328770584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498578434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007794473,0.0005893211,0.000009980571,0.00021924285,0.00031995866,0.0003789102,0.0004740635,0.000053155276,0.9978774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012727542,0.0003630869,0.000005834403,0.00016167997,0.0013399548,5.7504036e-7,0.000101948885,0.000029683879,0.98526967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987964,0.000054179134,0.00029769682,0.00029215417,0.0003218698,0.00023770539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870884,0.0001890381,0.0002813519,0.0004459905,0.0002618549,0.00011294802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119078504,0.00027704303,0.00033379832,0.00007578066,0.0006554587,0.00006662222,0.0004623431,0.00018571928,0.00012028658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012553522,0.00022098073,0.00027279477,0.0000030519286,0.0008944675,0.00007012574,0.00030018075,0.0003887614,0.000041587784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076991244,0.000013479229,1.5245284e-7,0.00006152902,0.00009477012,0.000012114972,0.000229166,1.9538993e-7,0.000004480638,0.97732836,0.01998638,0.0021923988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030385845,0.000056197943,0.0000024070027,0.00017573715,0.00018448486,0.000002272012,0.00004737841,0.000010723939,0.000055803477,0.0013997527,0.9975171,0.0002442996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006865178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000077381665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098873876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038708367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90113324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500888408","doi":"","title":"The Constellations of Empiricism, New Science, and Mind in Hobbes, Locke, and Hume","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Empiricism; Architecture; Epistemology; Passion; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15396086838569376,"score_gpt":0.31544202278488576,"score_spread":0.161481154399192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500888408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937622,0.0022947155,0.000007989448,0.0010755436,0.00011386985,0.00016023747,0.000027320131,0.000014744522,0.002543386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442124,0.0015701342,0.000004576403,0.00009150538,0.00008514094,2.6134398e-7,7.574455e-7,0.000008722676,0.0038176803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884814,0.00009027092,0.0002144069,0.00028474763,0.00025067074,0.00031178741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989879,0.00038389018,0.00008474806,0.00020954353,0.00010847836,0.00022542568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029139323,0.00014561084,0.00020805205,0.00028130258,0.000387331,0.00019414189,0.00030623816,0.000054077533,0.000049645776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071784954,0.00009220426,0.00004176042,0.00019025858,0.0018986922,0.0007697089,0.00022872518,0.00014583104,0.000024655796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008547754,0.00009551842,0.6618919,0.00005542269,0.000042638294,0.000033697288,0.0023328338,1.4437059e-7,0.00014659869,0.29757616,0.000001924797,0.037737723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002704877,0.00029580327,0.3890902,0.0008948737,0.00014395056,0.000046562378,0.0013900223,2.7184976e-7,0.0006980363,0.035395812,0.5686887,0.0006509083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007835832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009148981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5686867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005508189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011354184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6995811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501383000","doi":"10.1057/9781403978592_3","title":"Philosophy’s Hidden Revolt against God","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Obedience; Revelation; Philosophy; Aside; Philosophy of religion; Islam; Morality and religion; Epistemology; Religious studies; Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.0450374058521051,"score_gpt":0.2369015039621136,"score_spread":0.19186409811000849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501383000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007005452,0.00244634,0.0000013445579,0.0015122024,0.0013705854,0.0006612473,0.001222915,0.0003619747,0.9923533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51049966,0.0004472436,0.000065578795,0.006221845,0.019805735,0.000041182404,0.00047103467,0.0002810454,0.4621667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626666,0.00006192361,0.0009872122,0.00097089756,0.00078825967,0.0009250642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765956,0.00016522157,0.00035928568,0.0010127707,0.00022057579,0.0005825768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015644968,0.0011073799,0.0010905116,0.00027572186,0.00045383233,0.00021395278,0.0007286214,0.0005512414,0.012931592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027063175,0.00095354125,0.0008921637,0.000008588846,0.0009684512,0.000008116868,0.00029859482,0.0010817497,0.0035909223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053391628,0.0000073923557,0.0000026895807,0.0001491991,0.0002776233,0.00012025333,0.00071172044,1.5700034e-7,0.000005596577,0.9815726,0.0013405515,0.015758822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002950815,0.00007872455,0.0000031554732,0.00024922952,0.0001081444,0.000008991903,0.000009033046,0.0000033532083,0.000012277929,0.5102973,0.48829314,0.00064153556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004036084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010645623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53018665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016766683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075835706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509919346","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n7p119","title":"The Critique of Leo Strauss to Modernist Political Thought","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Politics; Epistemology; Morality; Certainty; Political philosophy; Nihilism; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04155837880000607,"score_gpt":0.2911331605203005,"score_spread":0.24957478172029446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509919346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25433552,0.0014544881,0.00076924195,0.26514632,0.0023109384,0.00031940476,0.0007381568,0.0000310473,0.47489485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923938,0.000074244264,0.00007096393,0.0028940816,0.0018511586,0.0000012319488,3.7307237e-7,0.000013280877,0.002700867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985558,0.00007778389,0.00053568254,0.00009421416,0.0002839396,0.0004526016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845153,0.00054936996,0.00011156177,0.00014631043,0.00028955896,0.00045167582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025894484,0.00012655942,0.00025846824,0.000039835428,0.00025209365,0.000104388855,0.00020312546,0.00004788295,0.00016189505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013046384,0.00005928518,0.00014827278,0.000016198665,0.00081116485,0.00011882031,0.00005404668,0.00015341438,0.000008923159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030797084,0.00007402302,0.000019482019,0.000019399255,0.000041401472,0.000008485689,0.00031470257,1.1787526e-7,0.000106414234,0.9981016,0.0008965788,0.00038698805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024512602,0.00024195565,0.00006244795,0.000080515856,0.000028951219,0.000031426927,0.00025876012,0.0000023287778,0.0008105534,0.517995,0.48016724,0.000075710086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011698172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067300774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73805827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003269112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044001543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29887706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514992111","doi":"10.22439/fs.v0i0.5012","title":"Foucault Among the Stoics: Oikeiosis and Counter-Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foucault Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Relation (database); Transcendence (philosophy); Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Cicero; Natural law; Sociology; Political science; Classics; History","score_opus":0.13655010419285507,"score_gpt":0.3083052965659935,"score_spread":0.1717551923731384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514992111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78515583,0.012305209,0.00001698911,0.108595215,0.0037585327,0.00064295874,0.00034989772,0.000278627,0.08889672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980889,0.0013217708,0.000011299261,0.002004297,0.0017873438,0.00006666315,0.0000022983843,0.000022266475,0.013895024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862397,0.00009203504,0.00029035434,0.00031591955,0.00026298943,0.00041471713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985892,0.0007721916,0.00007734276,0.00027029307,0.00018523198,0.00010571171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020065023,0.0002525549,0.0003216024,0.00004009079,0.0007559663,0.00010385186,0.00019991327,0.00004741075,0.0006922144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026366665,0.00010845069,0.00011954375,0.000033799068,0.0018654446,0.00024046733,0.0002042128,0.00014404304,0.00019936715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003628834,0.00009475456,0.0021641874,0.00006225716,0.0004962772,0.000009219903,0.014141734,8.213104e-8,0.000038974806,0.93304145,0.044513013,0.0054017603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005197335,0.000128432,0.0015982608,0.0001581712,0.00010787343,0.000004575363,0.004908939,0.0000031579254,0.00010706933,0.12904781,0.8631359,0.0002800902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007244427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028097234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003971497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000099885165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25352695","doi":"10.25071/1718-4657.36729","title":"“HE WHO IS UNABLE TO LIVE IN SOCIETY . . . MUST EITHER BE A BEAST OR A GOD”: SITUATING THE “INHUMAN” IN ARISTOTLE’S POLITICAL THOUGHT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections conference journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Essentialism; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Instinct; Sociology; Posthuman; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1357648049082522,"score_gpt":0.3021640168670838,"score_spread":0.16639921195883156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25352695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8216727,0.00012094226,0.00048940827,0.081927836,0.0013869896,0.00050147856,0.00012488423,0.000067379995,0.09370838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801044,0.000045761248,0.00011422664,0.007949345,0.0013691238,0.000035655517,0.0000023876344,0.000022580442,0.010356516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978655,0.00018464243,0.0005984956,0.00028787614,0.00033467083,0.0007287904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891925,0.0002644893,0.000096986085,0.00021245894,0.0002167645,0.00029002666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032619212,0.00024128148,0.0003188286,0.00015969267,0.0008420212,0.0002993086,0.00035493728,0.000098743476,0.012837001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017972257,0.00015270758,0.00025100168,0.00017712961,0.0004974709,0.00028974158,0.00012232322,0.0012378971,0.00015009551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022333732,0.00076798414,0.0025135253,0.000028784238,0.00015266168,0.00017578606,0.2370827,0.000027743085,0.00004261503,0.73250824,0.025931232,0.00054541545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030398793,0.0013501038,0.008208937,0.0015801163,0.00013343664,0.002011835,0.2666278,0.0036129216,0.00022388765,0.107895955,0.6039945,0.0013206529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015265916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072238417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6246123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002896084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019492995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554027602","doi":"10.4467/20844131ks.16.009.5329","title":"The renaissance of political realism in Early Modern Europe : Giovanni Botero and the discourse of \"Reason of State\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Realism; Classics; Historiography; Virtue; Literature; Philosophy; Humanities; Law; History; Epistemology; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.012131222969455378,"score_gpt":0.18709461493926535,"score_spread":0.17496339196980998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554027602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.905396,0.00025449682,0.000090925096,0.0050358535,0.00024171144,0.00031658594,0.0001480174,0.000030531482,0.088485874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97977895,0.0002405635,0.000020486706,0.0000318483,0.00008007182,1.5761128e-7,0.0000013452758,0.000016154127,0.019830441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979183,0.00052665797,0.00039592362,0.00035660347,0.000331597,0.000470916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978893,0.00075068435,0.0003241672,0.0005613967,0.00027068894,0.00020378237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000258904,0.0002348171,0.00046860994,0.00021524365,0.0003658228,0.000029826682,0.00070142513,0.000096644035,0.000022094833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006200382,0.0001469606,0.0002216692,0.00023091766,0.0059178937,0.00033137493,0.00029271754,0.0002509567,0.0000029123244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013058143,0.00016368704,0.00440099,0.000056741952,0.0001270353,0.0001364247,0.006812711,0.000003884284,0.0006199884,0.9855092,0.000109825334,0.00075367774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03665298,0.002905683,0.08730578,0.0037873914,0.0019273635,0.00015500166,0.045786884,0.00074817566,0.027649306,0.115078636,0.67476547,0.00323736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027443827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044946527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8704306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009272895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108798675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557603865","doi":"10.1177/1354066116679244","title":"Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Attributive; Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Typology; State (computer science); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10019829356134309,"score_gpt":0.2927816586436426,"score_spread":0.1925833650822995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557603865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4131709,0.00049299747,0.028155692,0.4161527,0.008142674,0.00028403415,0.0011096315,0.000098848635,0.13239253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631173,0.00009355077,0.00027216107,0.00047769625,0.0015842594,0.0000015776485,0.0000089524165,0.000013776045,0.01123627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989582,0.00015772239,0.00035716008,0.000120773824,0.0002697439,0.00013644925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888724,0.0003746738,0.00014054391,0.000068962676,0.0003523002,0.0001762918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028991955,0.000104162755,0.00011814787,0.0001975901,0.00020732157,0.0002013257,0.00018491363,0.000014555292,0.002518975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006116007,0.00006603903,0.00010926176,0.00004068896,0.0001706099,0.0004765176,0.000047653517,0.00016178949,0.00027461597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026546366,0.0003001266,0.0017443128,0.0000073246447,0.0005654542,0.0000644081,0.009121087,0.00004896111,0.0013515467,0.84090745,0.104760766,0.040863115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002637907,0.00019855982,0.0039670975,0.00020074606,0.000039011444,0.000053102107,0.0013338863,0.000051812607,0.00013709391,0.0122141335,0.98141235,0.0001283907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004383539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001946152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005292877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019234012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559032116","doi":"","title":"Language and Curiosity in Hobbes’ Philosophical Anthropology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","keywords":"Curiosity; Anthropology; Philosophical anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.030427002592725044,"score_gpt":0.26897552471418545,"score_spread":0.2385485221214604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559032116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6776673,0.0005229697,0.00002012752,0.19046433,0.0012874828,0.0004816584,0.00008709674,0.0002546253,0.12921438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927877,0.0003726233,0.000047749465,0.0036627355,0.0016923689,0.000038923088,0.000038704504,0.000042018848,0.0013171617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763966,0.00018304217,0.0005124086,0.00065600494,0.00034611262,0.0006627508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987169,0.00045616383,0.00010244558,0.00035816294,0.00007780505,0.00028854157],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025950235,0.00036764602,0.0004370817,0.00021219239,0.0004156829,0.00012380746,0.0002756771,0.0001531722,0.011983459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024205468,0.00025482065,0.000120242476,0.00011169747,0.001983855,0.0005825088,0.00013315772,0.00029841586,0.00072908413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009929163,0.00022223314,0.0015003127,0.000029926565,0.00005032151,0.000034960514,0.00398247,1.8348426e-7,0.0011470593,0.96765953,0.000100686084,0.025173044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004919413,0.000506522,0.0099622365,0.0002614042,0.000120991695,0.00007491379,0.0022496455,0.000027399718,0.0005826183,0.542748,0.4370878,0.0014590851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018313702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043482814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4369871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013551676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004204504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560342508","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2017.1266213","title":"Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020665981247692908,"score_gpt":0.22146315943528092,"score_spread":0.20079717818758802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560342508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175681,0.002070278,0.00012763089,0.036904905,0.0016081721,0.0002588521,0.00003973635,0.000014746804,0.041407567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969841,0.00008623462,0.000055898392,0.0001161674,0.001459804,9.631142e-7,1.1813506e-7,0.0000065487634,0.0012901627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908936,0.00007466871,0.00040578758,0.00006280419,0.00022861008,0.00013877181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991919,0.00024904008,0.00021657621,0.0001026157,0.00015232067,0.00008759647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035252937,0.00008390732,0.00024086359,0.000046269914,0.00006580563,0.000034918205,0.0001496445,0.00002441175,0.0006438058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029000495,0.00003245181,0.00013104826,0.000018838158,0.0004978368,0.00014308975,0.000009458298,0.00010507329,0.000017925651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003177654,0.000075591604,0.00004023065,0.000022743867,0.000072350595,0.000015049539,0.004923423,1.4223597e-8,0.00035566773,0.9275452,0.0007408748,0.0658911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053622727,0.0018759586,0.0001962666,0.00032310162,0.00013615232,0.000219306,0.0010715994,0.00000612937,0.0014211171,0.7730411,0.21616985,0.00017711359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009784168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028702507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21542898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010837245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016961681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70492214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562642994","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198746775.003.0005","title":"Laws and Powers in the Frame of Nature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Relation (database); Law; Dilemma; Power (physics); Newton's laws of motion; Motion (physics); Focus (optics); Frame (networking); Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Physics; Classical mechanics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.025906351001966456,"score_gpt":0.21343735571896535,"score_spread":0.1875310047169989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562642994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006012448,0.0002024236,8.6839714e-7,0.00021355842,0.00023538667,0.00021477051,0.00040283788,0.000017725564,0.9981112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015115822,0.00011151404,0.000010203187,0.00054894225,0.00054497767,4.782557e-7,0.000036944322,0.000014838258,0.9836163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991614,0.00008321104,0.00013477639,0.00021568917,0.00020793974,0.00019695844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935836,0.00017469322,0.00009455673,0.0002517201,0.00006077494,0.00005987629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000956208,0.00018802636,0.0002641543,0.00007793117,0.00012799291,0.000040771698,0.00040486152,0.0003243124,0.00013956043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009667215,0.00013963146,0.00011543246,0.0000048788283,0.00089878764,0.00005130946,0.00015739132,0.0006985368,6.603832e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057656307,0.000028319813,0.0000017886532,0.00008509622,0.00004298817,0.00002214906,0.002998112,2.8800503e-8,2.0084968e-7,0.9817411,0.014867961,0.00015462573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003014958,0.000083566796,0.000006530387,0.00012620901,0.00007013426,0.0000017347952,0.00029687257,0.00000203993,0.0000034151653,0.04871098,0.9502464,0.00015064036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005100984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007004484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93537843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003484091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038485054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5694006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566391379","doi":"10.1515/agph-2015-0008","title":"On the Significance of Formal Causes in Spinoza’s Metaphysics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Causality (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.10791828889452777,"score_gpt":0.28472767351323763,"score_spread":0.17680938461870987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566391379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5235459,0.0004929277,0.000033282435,0.047357213,0.0010029688,0.0009230901,0.00029110204,0.00010575378,0.42624778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484795,0.000020938694,0.000043144068,0.003233956,0.0014895394,0.000048700083,0.000025422345,0.000035324236,0.00025501597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777853,0.00023987217,0.00052810414,0.00034280136,0.00054758403,0.0005631213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983679,0.00062915136,0.00014463665,0.00052765425,0.00010532868,0.00022534806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040400718,0.00030654215,0.00040942075,0.00014802856,0.0001761619,0.000057593857,0.0005050776,0.000053302378,0.00027389918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020458673,0.00019738147,0.00020790077,0.00013225412,0.0007831316,0.0002665865,0.00014566473,0.0005244542,0.00021446687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001549767,0.00036926186,0.0000796827,0.00003418177,0.000079643294,0.000012713328,0.003465069,0.000048119346,0.000044766442,0.99466443,0.00071479165,0.00033235678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066183886,0.00029432506,0.00040938574,0.00007331099,0.000050020837,0.0000024363703,0.00026767905,0.00010357836,0.0006375008,0.9743936,0.022838667,0.0002676762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013471383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009111858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47130206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029048864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007596738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80489826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568666897","doi":"10.1017/s0034670516000826","title":"Arthur Shuster : Punishment and the History of Political Philosophy. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016. Pp. ix, 192.)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Politics; Content (measure theory); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048573991346132724,"score_gpt":0.25667017933305675,"score_spread":0.20809618798692403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568666897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085600285,0.46675158,0.0000022541924,0.015073914,0.0007120218,0.00058082177,0.00029544852,0.000012891921,0.51571506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7802574,0.20779747,0.000023788085,0.0018422896,0.001055742,0.0000039282486,0.000009287229,0.00001983966,0.008990277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846727,0.00025749992,0.00046376232,0.00015939993,0.00031627834,0.00033578987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805003,0.00029490332,0.00038894045,0.0009288882,0.00018407269,0.00015316298],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046318828,0.00018182874,0.0006139592,0.0000030506537,0.0002184645,0.000015512549,0.0006582542,0.000051605588,0.0014564192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000148942,0.000103069084,0.00028561396,0.000002873893,0.00381945,0.0001868645,0.00028831832,0.00012823637,0.0000065328754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042788004,0.00010511954,0.000009101158,0.0024738326,0.000089523506,9.133069e-7,0.001315353,1.5230434e-8,0.0000011600366,0.98551697,0.0101010585,0.00034414188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066989055,0.00009171498,0.00026956902,0.002080118,0.00040987422,0.0000029392313,0.000255332,0.000011348471,0.000012037914,0.113142796,0.8829209,0.00013343777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012962347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047033452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8728199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019617089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009141218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580846843","doi":"10.1017/s0018246x16000418","title":"HOBBES'S CONVENTIONALIST THEOLOGY, THE TRINITY, AND GOD AS AN ARTIFICIAL PERSON BY FICTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Historical Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Sincerity; Interpretation (philosophy); Theology; Natural theology; Convention; State of nature; Epistemology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1096112984153532,"score_gpt":0.28713015995419233,"score_spread":0.1775188615388391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580846843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29576784,0.0036372133,0.00019672407,0.3634394,0.012387049,0.0004166961,0.000121342,0.000096073265,0.32393762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98388934,0.00010239919,0.000004842144,0.0011394689,0.005281868,0.000005157103,0.000005733599,0.000010869098,0.0095603485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887645,0.0002559837,0.00021637818,0.00014323759,0.0002723175,0.00023565942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914306,0.00016404151,0.00017899978,0.00026240494,0.00007702563,0.00017446981],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053685275,0.0001263344,0.00015567715,0.000020486854,0.004208181,0.00054045755,0.00044718123,0.00005824456,0.0020882972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012314106,0.00006341274,0.0001305032,0.000009919429,0.00089355954,0.00022281693,0.000058027403,0.00055904815,0.00006331903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108383865,0.00015704743,0.00004350324,0.000002688096,0.000033119937,0.000007373685,0.00204444,1.2429285e-7,0.00004418742,0.95024335,0.0452053,0.002110488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022350489,0.0002009691,0.00027678543,0.000006726986,0.00005515952,0.00011732899,0.00038871993,0.000028304368,0.000016116779,0.31782925,0.6807658,0.000091329384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041196466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004677703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68812144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013331935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021678537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589771262","doi":"10.1017/cco9780511791581","title":"The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Democracy; Deliberation; Economic Justice; Citizenship; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law; Political science; Ancient philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0410185013408587,"score_gpt":0.23436892670126633,"score_spread":0.19335042536040764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589771262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032724798,0.00043738922,0.00000868135,0.011558636,0.002302435,0.0004679534,0.0002575759,0.00013383663,0.98480076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004251339,0.000060883474,0.000015750378,0.0060800854,0.008407834,0.000034952896,0.00014296449,0.00006297538,0.9809432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981546,0.00005276985,0.00043986784,0.00032180783,0.0004153623,0.0006156029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839896,0.00041469382,0.00008307466,0.0005164594,0.00017678193,0.00041003994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103834354,0.00037184625,0.0003744685,0.00006032645,0.00074750226,0.00047760754,0.00049949903,0.00016146274,0.0051818583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003096543,0.00021286309,0.0002504804,0.000013305795,0.0004737523,0.0000583924,0.00020251206,0.00051445444,0.012128874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018750414,0.000017521017,2.3685173e-7,0.000014416589,0.000027306858,0.0000014791757,0.00013259491,6.093435e-8,1.0609165e-7,0.5476035,0.45193478,0.00026610307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063169085,0.000054769236,0.000005245462,0.000044911383,0.000031996893,0.000001860337,0.00005164516,0.0000063504303,0.0000016502972,0.27271983,0.726771,0.00024755255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028502638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007268813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27488366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001705566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101204794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99572754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592186663","doi":"","title":"Review of S.J. McGrath and Joseph Carew (eds.), Rethinking German Idealism (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"German idealism; Idealism; Hegelianism; German; Constructive; Philosophy; Historiography; German philosophy; Epistemology; Art history; Political science; Law; History; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01718077962345372,"score_gpt":0.23437875239042996,"score_spread":0.21719797276697625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592186663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80835015,0.11332553,0.002425667,0.035721205,0.0037827948,0.00089123816,0.0011782718,0.000076568525,0.034248553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209026,0.07733971,0.00004933235,0.00030456766,0.0007890444,4.6260123e-8,0.0000112666385,0.0000097246,0.0005937136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809134,0.00041415895,0.000623785,0.00015980139,0.00047346792,0.00023742871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975931,0.0005263618,0.0009150982,0.00032625746,0.00048431059,0.0001548503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010727834,0.00019440048,0.0008639797,0.00023619598,0.00023739504,0.000018982042,0.00054130435,0.000072760784,0.0014411896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096103904,0.000111477566,0.0005988985,0.00019802258,0.0007227144,0.00006379247,0.00013995098,0.00022112529,0.000009756924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031757767,0.00018377102,0.0020723997,0.002989323,0.0128370095,0.00021485753,0.019666037,0.000038765098,0.001446527,0.93001765,0.009477008,0.017880855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009512613,0.0013367952,0.005721499,0.013088912,0.03388393,0.00025095762,0.0025070622,0.00047283716,0.000050242255,0.6456572,0.28609636,0.0014216285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015951457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022581352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2843605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007988145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007124263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596494602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1301776","title":"Hobbes’s agnostic theology before <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Agnosticism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Existence of God; Epistemology; Faith; Subject (documents); Atheism; Reflexive pronoun; Theism","score_opus":0.048130816466386256,"score_gpt":0.2460425757805446,"score_spread":0.19791175931415833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596494602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09089532,0.0016637059,0.000013613892,0.101775855,0.007653501,0.00020521918,0.00032040602,0.000020645562,0.79745173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866358,0.000020488833,0.0000263587,0.003390018,0.008694587,0.000002081316,0.000005543857,0.000026340505,0.0011987891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986344,0.000063692096,0.000443065,0.0001591914,0.00020012769,0.000499533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977963,0.00009220065,0.00037333288,0.00043814234,0.00026486622,0.0010351725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021720948,0.00020408283,0.00037089156,0.00019071564,0.001052771,0.00031936288,0.0008856417,0.00009317419,0.0033078375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046188178,0.0001579709,0.00029226317,0.000017626939,0.0011813162,0.0003846269,0.000037678055,0.00043444024,0.00025794882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015888292,0.000028257273,0.0010241148,0.000019615767,0.00006791405,0.0003545697,0.0012825038,8.661323e-7,0.0000027180877,0.99250025,0.0038331558,0.0008701285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036058848,0.00025984476,0.0009357533,0.00009509411,0.00005401553,0.00008467534,0.00003190868,0.0000027416788,0.0000132205305,0.68811506,0.30990747,0.000139604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001547237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009588632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89574045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067743924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003277317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598124170","doi":"","title":"Resistance and International Law; De-Coloniality and Pluritopic Hermeneutics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Modernity; Negation; Resistance (ecology); International law; Sociology; Normative; Law and economics; Power (physics); Negotiation; Phenomenon; Hermeneutics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022149055506318675,"score_gpt":0.247783572427401,"score_spread":0.22563451692108233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598124170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8005951,0.0038506663,0.00016677991,0.07596001,0.0010539676,0.00013341302,0.00005219864,0.000056380177,0.118131466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756843,0.002756542,0.00001803341,0.000701075,0.0013956663,0.0000020720952,7.2154216e-7,0.000007982765,0.019433603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987856,0.00005800879,0.00015406193,0.00012318755,0.00011083301,0.0007682733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967694,0.000074400035,0.000045817702,0.000060659455,0.000043509972,0.00009865995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037853082,0.000088338646,0.000096426134,0.000022509126,0.00023532024,0.00009857789,0.00010397004,0.0000364426,0.00017538642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032121872,0.000056758916,0.00003565974,0.000008413574,0.00028675416,0.00014622373,0.00003662224,0.00037844916,0.000007474675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003868633,0.000026254698,0.0003030528,0.000004673656,0.000044333716,0.0000024224914,0.00044905368,1.4976095e-8,0.000037549577,0.9951366,0.000054282595,0.0039030495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038752702,0.000052348514,0.00025207168,0.000022016795,0.000012920668,0.00004840054,0.00012765842,0.0000015263514,0.00001764437,0.7800713,0.21893582,0.00007077791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019312482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012613251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21888153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019745633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011216045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23145615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607084653","doi":"10.7202/1039300ar","title":"Le don de Spinoza à la phénoménologie de Jean-Luc Marion","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.06121825978856235,"score_gpt":0.3112653645050885,"score_spread":0.25004710471652614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607084653","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07084773,0.004377549,0.0005158132,0.47553343,0.0025595143,0.0006639229,0.0004543759,0.00041400056,0.44463366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461312,0.021305833,0.0009597562,0.009818456,0.008024404,0.000113028604,0.00006642123,0.00012937597,0.013451499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412787,0.00206048,0.0007859738,0.0009467643,0.0003624732,0.0017164535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957777,0.0013916873,0.0005149354,0.0014526915,0.00019422834,0.0006687323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021508816,0.00081255136,0.0008753708,0.00014043147,0.0017374037,0.0010494392,0.0016421142,0.0014731133,0.0011029266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022055188,0.00078121055,0.00064048724,0.000045940546,0.0034136116,0.0008019799,0.00083089835,0.0025494338,0.00036553538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028155002,0.0010579973,0.00077484874,0.00029252694,0.000196681,0.00074666244,0.0007990681,0.000043385815,0.00025202136,0.98786277,0.005516884,0.0021755835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007483683,0.00038605192,0.0013000848,0.00028684843,0.00008401804,0.000105496794,0.000086328946,0.00010038555,0.0007620318,0.532212,0.46338272,0.00054566725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005586258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009340265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034590095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009911269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607399104","doi":"10.1017/s0012217315000530","title":"Spinoza for Our Time: Politics and PostmodernityANTONIO NEGRI New York: Columbia University Press, 2013; 125 pp.; $24.00 (hardback)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0980221160454507,"score_gpt":0.24272917488208282,"score_spread":0.1447070588366321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607399104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18003044,0.012016899,0.0004653465,0.07524909,0.013773512,0.0054658535,0.02027078,0.0016005225,0.69112754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7519048,0.0003984466,0.00057972735,0.0030884496,0.009129762,0.0000116341125,0.0009954448,0.00010075548,0.23379098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862134,0.00008103459,0.00021481731,0.00032816775,0.00019865886,0.000555964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878776,0.00010550851,0.00007170864,0.00024463094,0.00015575453,0.0006346448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013164588,0.00020676595,0.00032260353,0.000030002355,0.0003118885,0.00025777574,0.00024135888,0.00013406925,0.00019731236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000818966,0.00022006666,0.00013073668,0.000027200746,0.000195079,0.00021523538,0.00012590515,0.00019380385,0.0001753003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006846281,0.00011838534,0.00014286916,0.0000334833,0.000053058415,0.000006831526,0.0012687652,0.0000015894176,0.0000028738275,0.46823943,0.5298171,0.00024714248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012033038,0.00020397466,0.00010788756,0.00002567033,0.00008304255,0.0000043314567,0.00046581743,0.0001589458,0.000013842907,0.06000104,0.9374465,0.00028566332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010786861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010454048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5718744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063701074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013013085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618733512","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2017.1322038","title":"Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s<i>Ethics</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Illusion; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09110031731990202,"score_gpt":0.2892774388847627,"score_spread":0.19817712156486067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618733512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39422572,0.20793432,0.00024341585,0.076547034,0.031475145,0.002599933,0.0014470782,0.00009259416,0.28543475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570066,0.00096764014,0.000051520616,0.0004775551,0.0011682744,0.000008446068,0.000003431743,0.000017510018,0.0016049381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879587,0.00008813126,0.00051182974,0.00014163888,0.00027185318,0.0001906742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864393,0.00031171087,0.0004955044,0.00021046969,0.00024615822,0.00009223411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076942524,0.00011905994,0.00031906003,0.000067827095,0.0007528618,0.00009455125,0.00038315175,0.000073449046,0.00017633798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052223913,0.00010550419,0.00018149108,0.000009895384,0.0017290743,0.0003144284,0.000059706057,0.0004503064,0.0000025929803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011763766,0.00017298933,0.00010534814,0.00023859765,0.000049255967,0.000018210512,0.002449271,0.0000013934717,0.0000618819,0.9898426,0.0045972588,0.0023455534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010365082,0.00012058374,0.0010239719,0.0004891008,0.000053286632,0.00011302912,0.00009188273,0.00003194041,0.000013520493,0.7544658,0.24243858,0.000121796824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005224051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026856226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60147494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087540815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090646194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63708466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621738759","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199736065.013.0007","title":"Spinoza and Jewish Ethics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Judaism; Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Religious studies; Theology; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09125931568043334,"score_gpt":0.22478111306697088,"score_spread":0.13352179738653752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621738759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048736983,0.00030002216,0.0000051519373,0.00046282186,0.0003865478,0.00026620686,0.00029117722,0.000109068395,0.99813026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023424984,0.00053305225,0.000033528788,0.0006707345,0.0008216986,6.9564396e-7,0.000039700357,0.000039822695,0.99551827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988542,0.000037367518,0.00017156404,0.00037430594,0.00026458688,0.00029796007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905705,0.00015384708,0.00011061181,0.00028971414,0.00013855123,0.00025022123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000662474,0.00033580887,0.00035121903,0.00008141813,0.00041259607,0.00014445536,0.0002845277,0.00043241555,0.0016040697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010401757,0.0003252397,0.0001751967,0.000001422398,0.00084795395,0.00010988168,0.00032433393,0.0010202692,0.000020187841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021660406,0.0000107550895,3.4540435e-7,0.00011039803,0.000101963466,0.000035817735,0.0010273156,5.192316e-8,3.6607997e-7,0.9919453,0.0038426952,0.0029033318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002442244,0.00006226216,0.0000011943191,0.00013227748,0.00013804458,0.0000032142814,0.000045086705,0.000005258757,0.0000032281666,0.13450086,0.8645225,0.0003418053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009198362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029960367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86067986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046099747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036180074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622003887","doi":"","title":"Rethinking German Idealism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"German idealism; Idealism; Philosophy; German; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Political radicalism; Reading (process); Politics; Hegelianism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02910992548761574,"score_gpt":0.1991892743673364,"score_spread":0.17007934887972068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622003887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001838324,0.00027600006,0.000015240932,0.00050275435,0.001228949,0.00017943082,0.0008770212,0.00014519911,0.99493706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082135394,0.000043486103,0.000016723081,0.00013268963,0.002129975,2.3538703e-7,0.00017281984,0.000048617265,0.91532004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819964,0.000041076277,0.00032457622,0.0004937415,0.0005639358,0.0003770296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984366,0.00020432226,0.00039792393,0.0005037687,0.0002113308,0.00024604535],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006280746,0.00036493814,0.0005585635,0.00014415759,0.00048121953,0.0002173462,0.0006552328,0.00029710823,0.0011292658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001847242,0.00035946473,0.0005627494,0.000022226302,0.0010089808,0.00055013556,0.00032188286,0.00040248144,0.0005392008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006623556,0.000055829125,0.000009196837,0.00015761983,0.00022541214,0.00031817704,0.0035922397,1.14265134e-7,0.000012290361,0.9206829,0.0733975,0.0014824664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025082356,0.00008671149,0.000017061624,0.00043278513,0.000092686554,0.000017430079,0.00009923722,0.0000021129158,0.000008656509,0.2517814,0.74685836,0.00035270557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038407463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023032844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6734609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020904496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013068694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265966170","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2582","title":"Pinto's Argument, Inferences and Dialectic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0688627130124364,"score_gpt":0.25771830160705134,"score_spread":0.18885558859461493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265966170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23773582,0.00028086745,0.000018091238,0.0023630864,0.000455128,0.00011337214,0.000013452533,0.00009913187,0.758921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265337,0.00018250722,0.000022729331,0.0027159788,0.0007326396,0.000010552179,0.000010084524,0.0000047465355,0.0036674154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992622,0.000017278955,0.00019732065,0.00010618067,0.00012767239,0.0002893429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996433,0.00007166763,0.000038284816,0.000087268396,0.000034831206,0.00012460083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006945662,0.000119787845,0.00013042509,0.000046824018,0.00021309083,0.00016101822,0.00009797797,0.000039100458,0.005673017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004131638,0.000082297156,0.000046886544,0.000029959903,0.00026966404,0.00033189007,0.000061106075,0.00012947644,0.0004844524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002019424,0.000038416518,0.0014911155,0.0000132083,0.0000128966485,0.0000068114014,0.0012449358,6.789214e-7,0.0000016140119,0.99251115,0.00025303307,0.004405939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025794262,0.00022547759,0.002736916,0.00001484518,0.000014698737,0.000018648549,0.000259667,0.000051838495,0.000011727982,0.23333834,0.7628991,0.00017079207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008655192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006240674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7626461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008324687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000102514305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727211656","doi":"10.1017/s0034670517000328","title":"Strauss's Double Turn - Joshua Parens : Leo Strauss and the Recovery of Medieval Political Philosophy. Rochester Studies in Medieval Political Thought. (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2016. Pp. xvi, 191.)<sup> 1 </sup>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Theology; Environmental ethics; Religious studies; History; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.11049025044275332,"score_gpt":0.3159779234495834,"score_spread":0.2054876730068301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727211656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20779915,0.2895403,0.000030386533,0.17829193,0.002274526,0.0059968843,0.0046414537,0.0001584545,0.31126693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96048486,0.0353155,0.000057003777,0.0014110836,0.0016478029,0.000010808579,0.000028308588,0.000043030097,0.0010015939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954492,0.0007306737,0.0013296106,0.00048716838,0.0008330496,0.0011702853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955345,0.0016193272,0.0006365993,0.001338864,0.00045796597,0.0004127874],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014321585,0.0005424466,0.0017355132,0.00006703167,0.00046076928,0.00007622054,0.001216067,0.00019601843,0.0001540797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073131424,0.00032215175,0.00056766253,0.00005681846,0.008684421,0.00037368844,0.0007331874,0.00067098066,0.000015077927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003148553,0.00028962395,0.00011246284,0.006861818,0.00038838346,0.0000135421205,0.0030057358,0.0000012102283,0.0000027126698,0.9880071,0.0008144806,0.00018805072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008251129,0.000806161,0.0015896109,0.022118421,0.0030035947,0.00009062347,0.010818212,0.000106650645,0.0007462672,0.8397667,0.111515604,0.0011870448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097630225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085312895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7526857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114010174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001848339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735525097","doi":"10.7756/spst.030.023.393-413","title":"“Degendered”: Spenser’s “yron man” in a “stonie” age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History","score_opus":0.23421734066803307,"score_gpt":0.3423502269750451,"score_spread":0.10813288630701201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735525097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43978098,0.02098264,0.0000057217503,0.021685159,0.0049022483,0.0008654807,0.0004340456,0.000378219,0.5109655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751079,0.0002946654,0.000099084005,0.0024672193,0.0022709717,0.00004720741,0.000028979282,0.000050747072,0.019633234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970726,0.0001775699,0.0006155189,0.00064859755,0.0005431715,0.00094257377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864733,0.00016069628,0.00012742614,0.00045470792,0.00025528096,0.00035454798],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039124448,0.00046763194,0.0007262273,0.00015303711,0.00029248596,0.0001052592,0.00038588574,0.000113151575,0.00067112537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025715368,0.00038266572,0.00019042945,0.0001723708,0.0010355429,0.00041400635,0.00033504452,0.00050264277,0.00086556154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000460601,0.00050935824,0.0011551179,0.00013563484,0.00024367565,0.0009663349,0.05094627,0.000011605565,0.000009716055,0.7554788,0.18932281,0.0007600744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016351319,0.00036698958,0.0009951717,0.00019561678,0.000048563914,0.000028680231,0.025850916,0.000010260666,0.00011281809,0.08354163,0.8865512,0.0006630294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027205385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018245227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6972284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000176275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004865563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749943052","doi":"","title":"Spinoza and the Galilean Heritage: “Galileo and Spinoza”, ed. Filip Buyse, Intellectual History Review, Vol. 23, n. 1 (March 2013)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Galileo (satellite navigation); Galilean; Art history; Philosophy; History; Geography; Theology; Geodesy","score_opus":0.05286527387401024,"score_gpt":0.26113985956961416,"score_spread":0.20827458569560392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749943052","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36056828,0.4914652,0.00009365033,0.030899435,0.006611511,0.0031243828,0.0034503618,0.0004639812,0.10332318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8450059,0.13526246,0.00014954271,0.0072265137,0.0056717503,0.000058558628,0.0012273781,0.00008549222,0.0053123753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975864,0.00035651872,0.00046063133,0.0007344252,0.0002891711,0.0005728036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971502,0.0007677551,0.00021062754,0.0015037485,0.00006609748,0.00030158562],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000932871,0.000392194,0.0005734698,0.000046027413,0.0015134895,0.00047731923,0.0013984538,0.0000692634,0.00055630226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001979076,0.00025623865,0.00008088031,0.00002372641,0.0022017504,0.00053401163,0.0016928398,0.0005491036,0.00004276683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015351883,0.00050045014,0.0040147337,0.011514045,0.0008915307,0.0000937789,0.06550046,0.000004108882,0.000042778243,0.25694317,0.6078995,0.05106026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086166704,0.00009240818,0.0022361195,0.0018849454,0.00020853542,0.000026003854,0.00065446465,0.006135656,9.5023637e-7,0.0060362564,0.98143226,0.0004307089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00154582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014080671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48443764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021151121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025607284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750836592","doi":"10.1177/2043820617720063","title":"Spinoza and the possibilities for radical climate ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Humanity; Metaphysics; Politics; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Applied ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10620890049122363,"score_gpt":0.32471113119134404,"score_spread":0.21850223070012043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750836592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85409546,0.0032738866,0.00001505243,0.029764323,0.0028552907,0.0018198679,0.0013527793,0.00017495784,0.10664836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962337,0.00029901738,0.000041495667,0.0015347024,0.001493493,0.00011171311,0.00008692149,0.000017088714,0.00018185182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986127,0.00014848904,0.00033051005,0.00028568317,0.00018326296,0.00043933972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849635,0.0007745974,0.00010828814,0.00046710428,0.00006322443,0.00009042536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009585677,0.00018124597,0.0003090702,0.000092075425,0.0022519508,0.0005755725,0.00043746698,0.000114367285,0.00013203497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037274073,0.00011463387,0.0002517187,0.000013691427,0.005803411,0.00017413047,0.00017031736,0.00043796416,0.00000899603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112133166,0.000072738374,0.004393973,0.00008931681,0.000028311124,0.0000015983042,0.008025093,1.1591024e-7,0.0000012506019,0.98682594,0.0002131352,0.00023640056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018843503,0.00010421584,0.007071235,0.00007211295,0.000033535132,7.4668543e-7,0.0003990018,0.000018519253,0.000008340444,0.8724717,0.11774612,0.00019011732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004754822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004393966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14213824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006942278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009044452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753757413","doi":"10.1017/9781316182253.002","title":"Sovereignty and Grace: Hobbes and the Puritans","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Politics","score_opus":0.04066873224028793,"score_gpt":0.2001620963852847,"score_spread":0.15949336414499676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753757413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000118438846,0.0011691671,0.0000018805299,0.00048901315,0.00027679084,0.0003280864,0.0007144871,0.000051248,0.9968509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03839676,0.00080256764,0.000003516077,0.00026159457,0.00066828314,8.0291704e-7,0.000020812751,0.000026203972,0.95981944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990253,0.0000468749,0.00013787331,0.0003597087,0.00018893009,0.00024131389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989824,0.00018897865,0.00014297156,0.00043021262,0.000078755744,0.0001766787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009922091,0.00031285113,0.00040462273,0.00004766132,0.0009960404,0.00027623397,0.00034791604,0.00017568975,0.00006825221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016614336,0.00023097509,0.00016628482,5.9876953e-7,0.0032033853,0.00010744792,0.0004288246,0.0004555379,0.000010014922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014825749,0.000006139416,5.438503e-7,0.00007098041,0.00013503882,0.00005891608,0.0003728454,1.0091055e-8,1.6342014e-7,0.99151176,0.0071927733,0.0005025844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001034368,0.00003357919,0.0000054434367,0.000119530836,0.00030162642,0.000012290968,0.00008857829,0.000008305217,0.0000034679595,0.031013517,0.96708494,0.00029434927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019836375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010611859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026137533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021162257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756056001","doi":"10.1515/sats-2017-0013","title":"Schelling on the Possibility of Evil: Rendering Pantheism, Freedom, and Time Consistent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SATS","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"German idealism; Idealism; Dilemma; Philosophy; Epistemology; Individualism; Personality; Psychoanalysis; Hegelianism; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11425953128225794,"score_gpt":0.266793812315916,"score_spread":0.15253428103365804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756056001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8292219,0.0002619075,0.0000017865673,0.0058867033,0.000350746,0.000157765,0.00006811067,0.000026385407,0.16402473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807566,0.000026284586,0.000015919328,0.00028399902,0.00043657795,0.0000030984068,0.0000017338124,0.000007685827,0.001149022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993194,0.000048527407,0.0001712555,0.00016123141,0.0001369809,0.00016265121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991329,0.00023545315,0.00008966987,0.00043915067,0.00004027708,0.00006259509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023835927,0.000097007585,0.00015704118,0.000013194686,0.00052400026,0.00012033631,0.0001802557,0.0000305907,0.0007682383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017466977,0.000056265726,0.00007409416,0.00000470568,0.0007475003,0.00006374505,0.00008750121,0.00012762655,0.00006539632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003829951,0.0000613271,0.00025068008,0.000031222644,0.000034610122,0.0000019837985,0.001097407,5.85258e-7,0.00015291719,0.99710435,0.00018861955,0.0010379825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011781773,0.0004946509,0.01923468,0.00082299043,0.00015794602,0.0000074604404,0.000897434,0.0011548942,0.0050672735,0.7334183,0.23691227,0.0006539522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011037662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017141821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2636861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007913844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008060702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84116703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756142725","doi":"10.1177/0952695117724661","title":"Braidotti, Spinoza and disability studies after the human","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of the Human Sciences","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Posthumanism; Everyday life; Disability studies; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.2265049600964461,"score_gpt":0.343164046691791,"score_spread":0.11665908659534491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756142725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8836372,0.0029730834,4.406899e-8,0.0070052207,0.0014233721,0.00012578425,0.000010584208,0.000014046247,0.10481071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98298025,0.000013371997,0.0000034151517,0.0005237642,0.0005460665,0.000011813626,1.7483129e-7,0.000004195717,0.015916938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989619,0.0000964304,0.00021197733,0.00023426168,0.000299143,0.00019624319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909073,0.00009485143,0.00016562102,0.00055626495,0.000045826782,0.000046730474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051254686,0.000118167394,0.00018238257,0.000014739641,0.0033201573,0.000111524896,0.00089101313,0.000020401209,0.00082193455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010807323,0.000055077795,0.00011859072,0.000009673278,0.024250638,0.00022555582,0.00035382912,0.00012159135,0.000008939253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005411904,0.000090650414,0.0083010625,0.000047183985,0.000021652348,6.6936485e-7,0.013389034,1.292285e-7,0.000059910624,0.9722613,0.0056427396,0.00018024542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019633627,0.00013601434,0.10493654,0.00009599681,0.000055292105,0.0000021526052,0.0017812299,0.0000029517128,0.000036899055,0.42357036,0.46898317,0.00020305964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022454497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005142897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5486909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008422847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018469795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759226668","doi":"10.1086/695244","title":": <i>The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03852248572778839,"score_gpt":0.26198041555885676,"score_spread":0.22345792983106838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759226668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09736789,0.0068860645,0.00014219782,0.01833794,0.003977868,0.00051787886,0.00016316854,0.00014704007,0.87245995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916064,0.00012084632,0.000024644687,0.00020489549,0.0012497822,0.000016208522,0.0000030655713,0.000014450822,0.006759709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989839,0.000035747562,0.00027747604,0.00017031963,0.00021133374,0.00032122326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988124,0.00012385758,0.00019119341,0.0006877266,0.00008418398,0.000100657046],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013532802,0.00013518638,0.00019652882,0.000016311615,0.001337959,0.00030162302,0.00056693575,0.00003889999,0.00033918995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037357007,0.00008461176,0.00014687072,0.000008522115,0.0011865579,0.00021094402,0.000024925976,0.0001389059,0.00009933429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047463676,0.000060711765,0.00016965556,0.000028462326,0.000031588585,0.0000039613265,0.0019440476,5.6250506e-8,0.000097986034,0.9683468,0.0075689224,0.021700379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028704052,0.00028045368,0.00046409527,0.00011219088,0.000016187994,0.0000016040807,0.00019639786,0.000011409442,0.0004569183,0.1331092,0.86493725,0.00012728259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007376018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013742132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89423853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009250779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015376512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766811220","doi":"10.1177/1474885117731941","title":"The two faces of personhood: Hobbes, corporate agency and the personality of the state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Personhood; State (computer science); Agency (philosophy); Politics; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Sociology; Personality; Social contract; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0684273226156935,"score_gpt":0.26585277960035913,"score_spread":0.19742545698466563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766811220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79009336,0.0019119683,0.000032648353,0.015053274,0.0010164991,0.00017469228,0.00015674715,0.000006408818,0.19155441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624133,0.00011863916,0.00001036926,0.000513529,0.00079143717,4.8292657e-7,2.9435196e-7,0.000016784117,0.0023071044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628097,0.0022492409,0.00062924705,0.000109105575,0.000388099,0.00034332584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969216,0.0013163714,0.0008777877,0.0004537513,0.0002467031,0.00018380753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035473478,0.0001568603,0.0003261888,0.000020677913,0.00090541464,0.00018444768,0.00096688635,0.000013498502,0.00022805097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013347137,0.000060733477,0.0003446001,0.000016477077,0.0071004294,0.00012725982,0.00024819054,0.00042330552,0.000009241145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027214634,0.000055726152,0.0001556451,0.00002547904,0.00011767601,0.000011313025,0.004401774,3.8179718e-7,0.000024454313,0.9935267,0.000118425975,0.0012902715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013484154,0.00016294829,0.009923777,0.000121762976,0.00013297198,0.000029249453,0.0020287076,0.000012160557,0.00021110717,0.96672827,0.019197088,0.00010355308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049130675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006612202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20614801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013217976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004582682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99560165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767068266","doi":"10.5325/jspecphil.31.4.0594","title":"On Rupture: An Intervention into Epistemological Disruptions of Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Hume","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Situationism; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07502693068023626,"score_gpt":0.3170794866370634,"score_spread":0.24205255595682718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767068266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93731326,0.0006561899,0.00017543683,0.016868418,0.00061422033,0.00019306513,0.000061971536,0.000010783991,0.04410667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794084,0.00007896525,0.00007518451,0.0002772136,0.0014455231,0.0000011178729,0.0000042177703,0.000011661998,0.00016526112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871993,0.00024198995,0.00048143967,0.00011738252,0.0002916982,0.00014754661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985596,0.00019845236,0.00061797263,0.00031191498,0.00017612021,0.00013592766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045765837,0.00016351341,0.00031978186,0.00007315804,0.00058687903,0.00009788098,0.00041578704,0.000051320345,0.00050126214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013684617,0.00009012646,0.00021307162,0.000016277596,0.0012904633,0.00031934291,0.000102321625,0.00036697992,0.000013200529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031836925,0.00039260008,0.00015214153,0.00003090591,0.00009682205,0.000010511462,0.0028842315,0.0000054913326,0.00009225741,0.99525857,0.0000433693,0.00071470917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005845146,0.0013362434,0.0063338797,0.00019088293,0.00010298322,0.00002886163,0.00022894194,0.000040744744,0.00013122863,0.9886095,0.0022986776,0.000113549504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050776238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014762786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06062761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026264604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007828436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54884684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767834551","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341377","title":"Is Collingwood a Historicist? Remarks on Leo Strauss’s Critique of Collingwood’s Philosophy of History","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Autonomy; Law","score_opus":0.09477770772894578,"score_gpt":0.2726190734748265,"score_spread":0.17784136574588072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767834551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074975185,0.025866283,0.000024837389,0.033137426,0.019922275,0.00078725215,0.0006015715,0.000038894097,0.8446463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916737,0.00029902835,0.00015588188,0.0013112234,0.00332395,0.000004767784,0.0000021317712,0.000057392914,0.003171906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960127,0.00025077353,0.001823438,0.00032149276,0.0012249794,0.00036662992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932875,0.00031215147,0.0039151832,0.0012259927,0.0010043047,0.00025485444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074011023,0.00042481843,0.0012775792,0.00036185276,0.0003532057,0.000017075425,0.0017848334,0.00021681059,0.0011154279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004704427,0.00032205597,0.0013807687,0.000040878193,0.0026725314,0.0003414026,0.00015005653,0.0008936685,0.000009240797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011355045,0.0015525179,0.00012332982,0.0008242292,0.00045008707,0.00003170761,0.0072046043,0.000013417854,0.001976942,0.9385669,0.04797768,0.00014307901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018668078,0.0016451551,0.00044961888,0.001740464,0.00048247416,0.000026482106,0.00010717289,0.000009988936,0.0025622058,0.40980253,0.5808575,0.00044958247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017199485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015672123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9166985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013949389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005074992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780626661","doi":"10.1163/18760759-03800007","title":"Grotius and Kant on Original Community of Goods and Property","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Grotiana","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Institution; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; International law; Property law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.10951164067472827,"score_gpt":0.2846923100046922,"score_spread":0.17518066932996393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780626661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66831076,0.00014203918,0.00000492211,0.0054022176,0.00034154372,0.00024507366,0.00010762342,0.00003032711,0.32541552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727774,0.000025097073,0.000038273407,0.00037416414,0.00036129763,0.0000044636,0.0000035913033,0.000008035384,0.0019073348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994082,0.000078953795,0.00013144432,0.00011214076,0.000109377506,0.00015988397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940187,0.00007051,0.00006479586,0.0003258597,0.000026939564,0.00011003148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014789321,0.00010704047,0.00017562974,0.000022682943,0.0007798321,0.000116337935,0.00017010114,0.000033007353,0.00027195053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052706884,0.00006251642,0.000034896155,0.000005113514,0.0006520504,0.00010981373,0.000106357584,0.0002253965,0.000016711316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048866536,0.00013963286,0.0019811355,0.00010225832,0.000028250388,0.0000045127354,0.0016959916,6.448014e-8,0.00001827735,0.9887886,0.0008186355,0.0063737878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015604523,0.0012508568,0.052756403,0.00032739821,0.00008971876,0.000024830524,0.00063929654,0.000107876316,0.0005330547,0.30068305,0.64155847,0.00046857525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018676065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023969242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6881055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000065967447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007794556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5997917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784756892","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00301002","title":"Scholasticism, Enlightenment, and the Problem of Print: The Mediality of the Debate about Benito Jerónimo Feijoo’s Teatro crítico universal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholasticism; Enlightenment; Dialectic; Legitimacy; Philosophy; Literature; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Humanities; Aesthetics; Theology; Sociology; Art; Law; Political science; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014444583671310147,"score_gpt":0.20743253002911805,"score_spread":0.1929879463578079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784756892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7101435,0.00030702006,0.00005926035,0.26144022,0.0005127691,0.00074235746,0.00012472727,0.000021115971,0.026649015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582994,0.00009602227,0.000020764257,0.0031778354,0.00059487444,0.000012357076,0.0000039310557,0.000008022931,0.00025624075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851197,0.00043869994,0.00037652673,0.00015632871,0.00033430848,0.0001821756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858177,0.00062388246,0.00029656515,0.00031408074,0.00013251072,0.0000511841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007703633,0.00013187862,0.00025511242,0.00003382417,0.00043595638,0.00007160275,0.00030364795,0.000035811125,0.00028379957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012448625,0.00004986441,0.00015002728,0.00006721939,0.0060873358,0.00013310125,0.00016815565,0.0002124189,0.000002269674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002236163,0.000052730524,0.00006792636,0.000045526496,0.000120360295,2.803824e-7,0.005576918,4.454412e-7,0.00015850998,0.9917456,0.0013723965,0.0006357035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009757729,0.00029673136,0.011052644,0.000410098,0.000721857,0.000031037518,0.003810879,0.0002438659,0.0044571464,0.4369424,0.5318874,0.00038820494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017614069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038439895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014204177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019213885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790871363","doi":"","title":"Against the Commodification of Water","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Business; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.05474881580164303,"score_gpt":0.2578255763904626,"score_spread":0.20307676058881957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790871363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.764808,0.00009442044,0.000019794508,0.00895237,0.00082793704,0.00010920784,0.000038223938,0.00004028505,0.22510979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946749,0.00002184876,0.000009421018,0.001333126,0.0017680597,0.0000057176353,0.000020118145,0.000008384538,0.0021583762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993927,0.000040268777,0.00017509388,0.00009810455,0.00012331086,0.00017055354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995719,0.00006017858,0.000036095455,0.00020905754,0.00008739606,0.000035341272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000099001394,0.000075678916,0.00009170212,0.000018832452,0.0001726902,0.000047519676,0.00022470143,0.000016772452,0.0008917685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000108449685,0.00003558347,0.000060643684,0.000011211886,0.0004717891,0.000075281685,0.000051921605,0.000065449865,0.00047838385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142506715,0.000054023127,0.00014229711,0.000008514839,0.000031034808,5.162685e-7,0.004502403,3.9920872e-7,0.0007442484,0.9920008,0.0007579143,0.001743568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022632285,0.000101465586,0.00022383235,0.0000257214,0.000023641882,0.0000011191228,0.00022588256,0.00021696545,0.04227611,0.18090643,0.77564734,0.00012518986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000131767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029307144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8110944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000064196515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027490762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801415455","doi":"10.22215/etd/2013-09988","title":"Human Nature in Hobbes and Thucydides","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Plague (disease); Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Economic Justice; Spanish Civil War; State of nature; History; Law; Political science; Ancient history","score_opus":0.02372924464872864,"score_gpt":0.274496406348128,"score_spread":0.25076716169939933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801415455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40683267,0.0014802477,1.587675e-8,0.0005956471,0.000621026,0.00018025709,0.000024429839,0.00004490402,0.5902208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80442655,0.00008010476,0.0000068403792,0.0006961967,0.00095111807,0.00002889148,0.00039532676,0.000023786924,0.19339119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904853,0.00003072365,0.0002530806,0.00026726723,0.00015727527,0.00024314086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996294,0.00005017041,0.00005056986,0.00012653145,0.000054811568,0.000088539666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000045542783,0.00023369011,0.0002846986,0.000116812545,0.00014307823,0.00019612629,0.00012316534,0.0003260439,0.008373135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019413408,0.00016750969,0.00007437378,0.000019278417,0.000105061044,0.000125533,0.000020029638,0.0006642307,0.00014224493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060357015,0.000058318292,0.000035674388,0.00013007582,0.000017820195,0.000003600964,0.002276041,1.4622322e-8,0.000020550802,0.9923561,0.004634563,0.00046117467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033275515,0.000083244064,0.0044899276,0.00029227516,0.00004139624,0.0000011006849,0.0037207734,0.0000047164317,0.00019618636,0.6009194,0.38938743,0.0005307565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047238567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030761783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3975939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013663552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000098567325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807965826","doi":"10.3989/hs.2018.014","title":"La leyenda dorada del protestantismo. Hermenéutica bíblica, libertad de conciencia y libertad política","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Hispania Sacra","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022581307358406716,"score_gpt":0.27114276841924645,"score_spread":0.24856146106083973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807965826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50486404,0.0027060788,0.00011939402,0.023868479,0.0021270781,0.0014725074,0.0009215981,0.00054515904,0.46337566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96863085,0.00023941444,0.00053418154,0.005845468,0.0049209944,0.000081901475,0.00004395358,0.00015052615,0.019552685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468315,0.00056630827,0.0009543413,0.0010316223,0.00081284,0.0019517314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966523,0.00077129115,0.00026939157,0.00088912074,0.00037361425,0.00104426],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005351854,0.0008364355,0.0008516908,0.00019818029,0.0012096018,0.0011758581,0.00091644976,0.0005494668,0.0169068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003684408,0.00073102186,0.00044537347,0.00025535957,0.003032041,0.0004481687,0.00036376252,0.0009803461,0.004759036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019676915,0.00082654704,0.0006211544,0.0002187973,0.0001896922,0.00016058778,0.0051698233,2.8323302e-7,0.0007102366,0.96934134,0.017302472,0.0052623213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001058652,0.0007791219,0.0020967433,0.00045607958,0.0002836268,0.00007305786,0.00034250636,0.00039338233,0.0007697442,0.04799921,0.94476175,0.0009861161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007310095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015477432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9274593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029136788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048796233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808231890","doi":"","title":"Review of Riccardo Saccenti’s Debating Medieval Natural Law: A Survey (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2016)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Middle Ages; Ideology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Period (music); Law; Transition (genetics); Canon law; Classics; Epistemology; History; Humanities; Political science; Politics; Theology; Aesthetics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04838886735422862,"score_gpt":0.26499434098453806,"score_spread":0.21660547363030944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808231890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19240704,0.0410029,0.0000056710223,0.0046714433,0.0016980228,0.001249889,0.0011720379,0.00013364333,0.7576593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211663,0.0045589986,0.00003113924,0.0010917059,0.00034110752,0.0000011560901,0.00007323372,0.000016929196,0.001769127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981606,0.00035680248,0.00046227168,0.00031379383,0.00030323857,0.00040331634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867207,0.00033799323,0.00019428304,0.0003313921,0.00033958742,0.00012468845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035312548,0.00020256206,0.00052613515,0.000051275598,0.00015444787,0.000019722189,0.0003707528,0.00007435277,0.0018015591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017638017,0.00017651904,0.00017998321,0.00013678469,0.0008432198,0.00016855131,0.00015865664,0.00024564538,0.00003819585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008850584,0.0016341521,0.005333786,0.009303602,0.00078188145,0.000067010864,0.008788629,0.0000020024236,0.00047874625,0.91293305,0.05401547,0.0057766144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026578305,0.0009781418,0.019036602,0.013824467,0.00068149366,0.000011820179,0.0006062094,0.0006703778,0.0011138231,0.030015873,0.9291148,0.0012885146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042350465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00703751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88291717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000461658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007118121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883081342","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190879808.003.0006","title":"“This Quarter of the Globe”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Globe; Metaphor; Commonwealth; State (computer science); History; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.036063602806906375,"score_gpt":0.20112079430725563,"score_spread":0.16505719150034925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883081342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042740234,0.00004399351,0.0000020751152,0.00017723981,0.00090278004,0.00023920306,0.0005947326,0.000045476463,0.99795175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001638156,0.000020635793,0.000008653153,0.00025077406,0.0015064637,4.6577026e-7,0.000022142596,0.000021443831,0.99653125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889886,0.00008659562,0.00019416094,0.00025866894,0.00030074312,0.00026096764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989828,0.00008155349,0.00018680212,0.0004985905,0.00014891829,0.000101375976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000057773967,0.00024734176,0.0003193739,0.000050329618,0.00028919106,0.000039057064,0.0007131323,0.00020870476,0.0025902335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007297263,0.00018146116,0.00038926752,0.000004893797,0.0011773442,0.00005450326,0.00033489033,0.0003481633,0.000013362266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003935347,0.000021961368,7.3444073e-7,0.00007306777,0.000088637695,0.000004649687,0.0009880387,2.1411022e-8,3.8633695e-7,0.7929531,0.20567997,0.00015009577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025184246,0.000077452794,0.0000013594365,0.00016544899,0.00018745029,0.000001201763,0.00004124667,0.000002943765,0.000029475235,0.025353588,0.9736772,0.00021077531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006938111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003405083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76799726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000896572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009085224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883285394","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-67407-0_5","title":"Spinoza Through the Prism of Later ‘East-West’ Exchanges: Analogues of Buddhist Themes in the Ethics and the Works of Early Spinozists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Sophia studies in cross-cultural philosophy of traditions and cultures","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Philosophy; CONTEST; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Naturalism; Ontology; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.20548908987168518,"score_gpt":0.36829220161660164,"score_spread":0.16280311174491646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883285394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2948046,0.19191289,9.362849e-7,0.06604383,0.0015135405,0.002869207,0.0037269064,0.00004466283,0.4390834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836951,0.012990971,0.00002595792,0.0005287095,0.0011116733,0.000048291124,0.000057882,0.000020809553,0.001520605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976366,0.00019133835,0.0010314548,0.0003572796,0.000517196,0.00026609102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767363,0.0007761019,0.0006219061,0.00039789322,0.00049525755,0.000035213594],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000481858,0.00047088662,0.0010201787,0.000077099256,0.0006103403,0.00009744942,0.00053000654,0.00029586253,0.0001276634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014132413,0.00019812613,0.00038932005,0.000071697636,0.0234309,0.00026059613,0.00014287191,0.0010160407,0.0000014040987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016600301,0.00010113599,0.000033824865,0.00051808264,0.00037649093,0.000002728199,0.15824789,0.0000011199828,0.000004151387,0.83973783,0.0007526212,0.00005814127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095038983,0.00035180236,0.0012356852,0.0018327705,0.0002450716,0.00000796673,0.010237899,0.0000010301118,0.000021459939,0.9704889,0.014374684,0.00025234924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018965584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025076923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6888905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018573615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001825125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97922677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899947921","doi":"10.7202/1053560ar","title":"Le suicide de Sénèque chez Spinoza","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05399055024066228,"score_gpt":0.29985003287385675,"score_spread":0.24585948263319446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899947921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091383114,0.004293575,0.0004985766,0.34495205,0.004166735,0.0008150073,0.00057854364,0.00053009513,0.5527823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206789,0.004176551,0.000729552,0.033241384,0.024313724,0.000098210134,0.00008976108,0.00015658584,0.016515322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937475,0.0019293721,0.0010013583,0.0010479069,0.0004561982,0.0018176845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968305,0.00074637035,0.0003011192,0.0008759937,0.00042743506,0.00081857305],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016762719,0.00088074827,0.0009146679,0.00019053234,0.000854164,0.0003679624,0.0009348624,0.0010834435,0.003963282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065882195,0.0008518095,0.0006273646,0.00018261427,0.0045588003,0.0005752215,0.00044253957,0.0019382808,0.0019060489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002598434,0.0010320036,0.00025104548,0.00021933703,0.00020868467,0.00023535683,0.0022142234,0.000005798689,0.0003878301,0.9833129,0.011408092,0.0004648798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060737215,0.00087597186,0.00035397406,0.00028954016,0.00007456317,0.000118788754,0.0001142597,0.00004488188,0.0032457241,0.5210678,0.4725936,0.0006135547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003267399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010404238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8292958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027101272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010795029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906995437","doi":"","title":"Review: Andrea Sangiacomo and Francesco Toto (eds.), \"Essentia actuosa. Riletture dell’'Etica' di Spinoza\"","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.03823395810823993,"score_gpt":0.2763907180194755,"score_spread":0.23815675991123558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906995437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5466393,0.34690928,0.0003349745,0.019169178,0.003909656,0.001934302,0.0068975673,0.0004971286,0.07370861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169828,0.07303921,0.00010730079,0.004632755,0.0033759787,0.000019791387,0.0012475131,0.000048184636,0.00054640416],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978645,0.00014312829,0.0004007163,0.0007318975,0.00025402042,0.00060574035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976445,0.00021535787,0.00021211126,0.0015395787,0.00003974113,0.0003487325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034239521,0.00038998635,0.0005278679,0.000039731614,0.0015465342,0.00071898254,0.0013739882,0.00007861276,0.00021421404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003057576,0.00029096784,0.0000843061,0.000030972136,0.00066810497,0.0006838005,0.001238524,0.00039840135,0.000032314143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011389514,0.0017454462,0.069583565,0.03760457,0.0025219296,0.00047568488,0.03675551,0.000030003213,0.0006650712,0.2806928,0.1687359,0.40005058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052188564,0.0000754069,0.01349098,0.0040771253,0.00029977062,0.000026114581,0.00015650276,0.0026794656,0.000013014596,0.009894025,0.9681942,0.00057150604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006442982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010682967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7994583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062303734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012617303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907604273","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000343","title":"Condillac et la critique d’un système. Le cas leibnizien","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030899112131698617,"score_gpt":0.2948423205637719,"score_spread":0.2639432084320733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907604273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022089476,0.0073851338,0.00018270548,0.06537437,0.0064626127,0.00038026925,0.0021909275,0.00017520592,0.8957593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95808685,0.00047398917,0.000059030175,0.00796364,0.009661968,0.000029111183,0.00020981218,0.00006384867,0.023451732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733645,0.00070483284,0.00046587817,0.00045819595,0.00026427867,0.00077034516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983213,0.0005897441,0.00008894373,0.00037463068,0.00024253278,0.00038283103],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046753272,0.0003688488,0.0004535787,0.00007952197,0.0006725123,0.0003435146,0.00030269456,0.00032787895,0.004952258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019852104,0.00034573753,0.0002668251,0.000076887176,0.0022061882,0.00027921208,0.00015747265,0.00046963865,0.002854515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037907153,0.00043736675,0.00007524452,0.0001298613,0.000110938694,0.00012347453,0.00513766,3.1056317e-7,0.000014807432,0.97627854,0.015639529,0.002014332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046857362,0.00021176938,0.00033922418,0.00014927395,0.000059370006,0.000045060926,0.00025485267,0.000020091176,0.0003453048,0.32321477,0.6745731,0.0003185945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005086732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079943734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93599737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007991118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014807185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911564157","doi":"10.7202/1055271ar","title":"Spinoza et Darwin, un héritage véritablement conceptuel ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.18704083362799145,"score_gpt":0.3422561157813269,"score_spread":0.15521528215333547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911564157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01312684,0.062352467,0.00001974117,0.26101607,0.005460181,0.0010325841,0.0014330755,0.00030073134,0.6552583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91518563,0.004148687,0.00032127122,0.04052415,0.013187031,0.0000646487,0.00025083608,0.00013764619,0.026180075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543583,0.0005480692,0.0010031456,0.00095272996,0.0007564154,0.0013038123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976234,0.00037419406,0.0002468396,0.0008536143,0.0003068177,0.0005951773],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006020298,0.0007982113,0.00088772684,0.00015155728,0.00044023446,0.0004493835,0.00064723514,0.00034189396,0.054224964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079653015,0.00075017073,0.0005592177,0.00009752797,0.0010852243,0.0008724678,0.0003957031,0.000980334,0.0065905983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008056286,0.0009861843,0.00020331524,0.0005012271,0.00028612523,0.000066893095,0.001924715,0.0000052025434,0.00008271543,0.97829944,0.01611228,0.0014513708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007778698,0.00047339578,0.00015444534,0.00038316412,0.000104953084,0.000010922519,0.00028422906,0.00004063273,0.00028029468,0.4347687,0.5621361,0.00058526476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047402905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014650741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90205884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020893666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104759114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912720178","doi":"10.5840/envirophil201912381","title":"The Human/Animal Logic of Sovereignty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Applied philosophy; General interest; Human animal; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Biology; Law; Ecology; Livestock; Politics","score_opus":0.02723762117224883,"score_gpt":0.21858929382115597,"score_spread":0.19135167264890712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912720178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43313003,0.000412466,4.133741e-7,0.001985353,0.00039382055,0.0002557811,0.00012354639,0.000029957871,0.5636686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952584,0.0000350881,0.000006949593,0.0007578179,0.00097802,0.000009389891,0.000032151664,0.000022047769,0.002900129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987438,0.000059625847,0.00031865342,0.0002413284,0.00033829408,0.00029832995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993382,0.00011988366,0.00010410636,0.00034126587,0.0000055575374,0.00009098547],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010217435,0.00018600574,0.00020482687,0.000024743109,0.0003321871,0.000041508065,0.00031321574,0.00004984103,0.011333894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005532116,0.000120131685,0.00020311565,0.00001663078,0.00075669907,0.000120522556,0.00014579788,0.00020236206,0.0016628605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038100345,0.00019193909,0.00060510525,0.000015662614,0.000038838927,0.0000017167092,0.0002611014,0.0000012583573,0.001381659,0.99718946,0.00016845818,0.00010671794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044777736,0.0003612922,0.0015449505,0.000017560524,0.000021583,0.0000019217978,0.00020542146,0.000009334426,0.0009015735,0.88998646,0.10630076,0.00020140107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008868746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.901617e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56212837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003880233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003832549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917400860","doi":"","title":"Leo Strauss on Nazism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Politics; Political theology; Nazism; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Communism; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.09377313309748674,"score_gpt":0.32734853935485286,"score_spread":0.2335754062573661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917400860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02002844,0.00033486707,0.000013160041,0.067538574,0.0022713954,0.00031346697,0.00003587463,0.000090302885,0.90937394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693158,0.000041151303,0.000017253791,0.022062859,0.0056063184,0.000012229119,0.0000011221961,0.000009820887,0.0029334242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974181,0.000102520775,0.00028011375,0.0003298766,0.00063825794,0.0012311446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998385,0.00023238576,0.000036027002,0.00048490902,0.00030227358,0.0005593673],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008254038,0.00017018763,0.00021228442,0.00004483645,0.0009322612,0.00022326864,0.0007383635,0.000029751203,0.0063538086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087935245,0.000082624945,0.00013045802,0.00015196444,0.0069064256,0.00017186718,0.00013112492,0.00023654793,0.0055765724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000460275,0.00006529994,0.000005133539,0.000010959182,0.0000037418815,9.636867e-7,0.0002439275,1.4450077e-8,0.000014398037,0.9956966,0.0017463826,0.002207985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056566572,0.00015039508,0.00018205875,0.0000638763,0.000016073478,0.0000028251336,0.00010063247,0.000015506004,0.00027364222,0.37729952,0.6217202,0.000118736105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009632855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015199377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94928735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008053538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007090364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940591297","doi":"10.1080/1354571x.2019.1573018","title":"Challenging intellectual hierarchies. Hegel in Risorgimento political thought: an introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Italian Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hegelianism; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07065970620145903,"score_gpt":0.30358277891720264,"score_spread":0.2329230727157436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940591297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9352587,0.007999791,0.00008616674,0.033225697,0.0032472194,0.00023838799,0.000021913493,0.000041133404,0.019881004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924425,0.00024959724,0.00007463301,0.00042091135,0.0049531506,0.000003238797,0.0000031281313,0.000023989198,0.0018288611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980359,0.00015315019,0.0006721695,0.00023396678,0.00040295976,0.0005018486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990402,0.0002275371,0.00014766368,0.00018118662,0.00021415217,0.0001892881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039453202,0.0002206314,0.00053549436,0.00027320968,0.00013770293,0.00008151569,0.00020797846,0.00005377709,0.00049142016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020050086,0.00016291314,0.0001800371,0.0000604564,0.00029468228,0.00052609923,0.0000880654,0.00046948265,0.000069524605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018964888,0.00042933878,0.00028783584,0.00008154064,0.000250679,0.000024877918,0.033495124,0.00005309116,0.000059783117,0.96228623,0.001278703,0.0015631677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019217053,0.0017292114,0.0004210989,0.00029231468,0.00012382196,0.00011436404,0.04462022,0.0007669092,0.00029983209,0.71131486,0.2377914,0.0006042819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010377818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031531847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25097138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016483717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002631895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6643405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948296990","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2019.1620531","title":"Leo Strauss and the Challenge of Revealed Religion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Levi strauss; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Humanities","score_opus":0.027081135554243577,"score_gpt":0.2195411310023926,"score_spread":0.192459995448149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948296990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12993251,0.0012184567,0.0000013058959,0.018952783,0.00031333338,0.00023195193,0.0000096918575,0.000029665249,0.8493103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99035007,0.00033267713,0.000002504984,0.00090373814,0.001016762,0.00000148718,0.0000028184234,0.000017162893,0.0073727793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988947,0.00045691148,0.00021447812,0.00013429821,0.00014077466,0.00015884962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992852,0.00023072277,0.00007213797,0.00033886533,0.00003295854,0.000040097268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006015969,0.00010270348,0.00016024662,0.000015509933,0.00013970815,0.0000805326,0.0002583721,0.000011457882,0.00049196644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003249594,0.000045588087,0.00008312531,0.000019086718,0.00051985285,0.00010323517,0.00010637264,0.00018447576,0.00041408255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068357636,0.000029513867,0.000009297597,0.000026737089,0.00002155441,0.0000017920581,0.004614222,4.423859e-7,0.000008701799,0.99325126,0.000938069,0.001030029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016875078,0.00014908875,0.00081611465,0.00008924162,0.000056237863,0.000004908106,0.0007063785,0.00002370457,0.00002104289,0.24383305,0.752456,0.00015674059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000583966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005871104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86041754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000035330706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000396232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53866875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979044787","doi":"","title":"Philosophical tensions in the liberal tradition, constraints on the good life","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.01744058939036197,"score_gpt":0.17311624138964066,"score_spread":0.15567565199927869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979044787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05804805,0.00016764516,6.656057e-8,0.08611122,0.00041205238,0.00029334854,0.000968539,0.000007768885,0.8539913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706309,0.00012298144,0.0000040503105,0.018379593,0.0006857822,0.000028404267,0.00017966585,0.000023342103,0.0099453125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732447,0.00019602563,0.00040894563,0.00026304877,0.0014924649,0.00031505205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847895,0.0009576144,0.00012089275,0.00023236331,9.4222725e-7,0.00020921431],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000018838093,0.00028676674,0.00030883882,0.000026403033,0.00042286288,0.00006980032,0.00037123635,0.000057271514,0.0015812182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000103595075,0.00016860296,0.00007926149,0.00004026442,0.00034781566,0.00012259082,0.00001994988,0.00059269706,4.8063605e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003656961,0.00008784599,0.000033593125,0.000058612444,0.000052612,0.00004908079,0.00084406405,0.0000022890265,0.000013089385,0.9943154,0.0032415665,0.00093616603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008448612,0.0003138532,0.020384667,0.0008836428,0.00014083466,0.000013503029,0.02435207,0.00014401245,0.00062308845,0.62979984,0.3216442,0.00085545046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065586105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01689549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9125828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000053399813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009328543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995240045","doi":"10.4000/books.psorbonne.39091","title":"Les accommodements raisonnables de Spinoza","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05893311694645475,"score_gpt":0.29073708026864703,"score_spread":0.23180396332219227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995240045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050500287,0.00087948865,0.00024506284,0.0025614176,0.0009260303,0.00045239832,0.0022720185,0.00022155927,0.987392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5673974,0.00032593217,0.0008621631,0.0024142396,0.010513039,0.00013263653,0.0003436019,0.00021143736,0.4177995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966548,0.0003348946,0.0007905673,0.0006545072,0.00042713628,0.0011380856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756104,0.00070964365,0.00027235367,0.0006598609,0.00020777511,0.0005893428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044017797,0.0008222953,0.0006886588,0.00023563483,0.002239406,0.0004921287,0.00060451473,0.0008601166,0.048081744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008683608,0.0008121769,0.00069526123,0.000015198104,0.004668083,0.00012749106,0.00027149895,0.0011919441,0.0014901725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000425035,0.00024628636,0.000033068965,0.00020796004,0.00039021365,0.00009081622,0.0011821572,0.0000024450583,0.000018876302,0.9864747,0.008329996,0.0029810057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036224475,0.00013593615,0.00007636126,0.0005444951,0.00027818457,0.000047066336,0.00010851825,0.00004105375,0.00005272616,0.4971807,0.5006953,0.00047740788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059961673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012995566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5695925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003787083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015399508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995495432","doi":"10.7202/1064974ar","title":"OF THE HUMANITIES AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL DISCIPLINE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surfaces","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eurocentrism; Modernity; Reading (process); Philosophy of history; Dimension (graph theory); Epistemology; Philosophy; History of philosophy; World history; Universal history; Sociology; Humanities; Social science; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Classics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.041468117577062126,"score_gpt":0.2369478598351789,"score_spread":0.1954797422581168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995495432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81341714,0.00072139926,1.7578988e-7,0.054329183,0.0006339548,0.00023627363,0.00005288531,0.000019500205,0.1305895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98903584,0.000025478827,0.0000029509376,0.001120056,0.00036409745,0.0000044041312,0.0000021139697,0.000008241165,0.009436813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992182,0.00010264294,0.00019422255,0.00012332965,0.00020740538,0.0001541459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993206,0.00033307227,0.00006050277,0.00022629582,0.000041156236,0.000018335544],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017318787,0.000104221675,0.00019331231,0.000012522286,0.00028525715,0.00008526571,0.00022941185,0.000027621878,0.001263607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031346182,0.0000427392,0.00010417815,0.000023515418,0.002070206,0.000073756695,0.00016204226,0.00015473769,0.0000439133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004568186,0.000028050405,0.00056400284,0.000031564134,0.000024705963,1.3200962e-7,0.0031804806,0.0000027683311,0.000014808775,0.9959391,0.00013364745,0.00003506747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080541376,0.00004779506,0.001512672,0.000038601123,0.000037103568,0.000001364878,0.00086457847,0.00009474297,0.00013338905,0.77454424,0.22181055,0.00010951634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060440205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052381878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2216769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004316039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001009558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995510321","doi":"10.1163/18760759-04000006","title":"Hugo Grotius and Samuel Pufendorf on Last Wills and Testaments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Grotiana","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Natural law; Law; Legal history; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.024078745137779505,"score_gpt":0.212762575687329,"score_spread":0.1886838305495495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995510321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7837582,0.00036505266,0.0000021698675,0.0032066668,0.0007520986,0.00042099782,0.00011685754,0.00007449545,0.21130343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902665,0.000048455127,0.000019296178,0.0024392053,0.00063768134,0.000009048918,0.000014394426,0.00001960949,0.0065457965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900997,0.000038349757,0.00016765286,0.00029185438,0.00018334654,0.00030884147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994382,0.00013335083,0.000036939742,0.00017756934,0.000024982312,0.00018890253],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000068648886,0.00017491147,0.00020345458,0.00005453706,0.00014679787,0.00013550185,0.00008698356,0.000047485675,0.0014030043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027557604,0.00013482427,0.000046550827,0.000023299846,0.00021637931,0.00013635904,0.000069691065,0.00016046588,0.0005250894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434236,0.00013380322,0.0051804464,0.00007649444,0.000041023995,0.000010099255,0.0010563897,3.5082533e-7,0.000039769708,0.9861737,0.002362514,0.0048910845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017207596,0.00071954593,0.018609812,0.00020113739,0.000049009734,0.000019089646,0.0005384873,0.000041496,0.00013532412,0.11606651,0.86136574,0.00053311203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006942451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032889075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8701072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014920637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060820903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004773445","doi":"10.1017/9781108778879","title":"In the Shadow of Leviathan : John Locke and the Politics of Conscience","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Politics; Conscience; Philosophy; Emancipation; State of nature; Law; Political philosophy; Sovereignty; Shadow (psychology); Political science","score_opus":0.047639807069669776,"score_gpt":0.2400838927358342,"score_spread":0.19244408566616442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004773445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013443992,0.0011780466,0.0000019121585,0.020622795,0.00017351795,0.00027970446,0.00021702453,0.000006505477,0.97738606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52145106,0.00032803265,0.00001184967,0.0115503995,0.0012682623,0.000009843231,0.00001731911,0.000017065375,0.46534616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988002,0.00010907881,0.00040643857,0.00016829095,0.00032350695,0.0001924701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986658,0.0008572898,0.00012870872,0.00022685833,0.00006451449,0.000056826055],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026423257,0.00016361104,0.00041091812,0.00004214547,0.00009650531,0.00004180296,0.0004278111,0.0000705254,0.0010963811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090838636,0.00007315741,0.00013937555,0.00002786486,0.0032350973,0.000044185555,0.0001159252,0.0003146421,0.000013968409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014212236,0.000029483579,0.0000029174032,0.00012351487,0.000017373339,0.0000025135005,0.005146442,4.200873e-8,4.586992e-7,0.98114234,0.013482673,0.000038009402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023688597,0.00004897411,0.0000051455977,0.000058570633,0.000035092296,0.000002035947,0.00041047693,0.00001311359,0.0000075537228,0.5423155,0.45680133,0.00006533996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029462366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121375284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52131665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011663136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009516703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009095845","doi":"10.7202/1067586ar","title":"ON HOBBES’ ARISTOTELITY","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science et Esprit","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Eternity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07768850292401068,"score_gpt":0.29876732086194263,"score_spread":0.22107881793793194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009095845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016559022,0.0017471464,0.00006599609,0.5824662,0.0031212848,0.0001722552,0.00023103211,0.00008281835,0.39555424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434754,0.00019325744,0.00009957023,0.041857,0.0025478425,0.000005030509,0.0000052764894,0.000017731894,0.011798888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973094,0.00013169574,0.00031739712,0.00066078996,0.0008102981,0.00077043806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984044,0.00025718636,0.00006721643,0.00031338306,0.00013427823,0.0008235682],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006034984,0.00024753972,0.0002578197,0.000061296836,0.0008357668,0.0005455638,0.0006703837,0.00008729747,0.007431671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007269611,0.00021430898,0.00016755512,0.000284338,0.0040941644,0.00048819356,0.00022204318,0.0006119082,0.0045063333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036337053,0.00022634854,0.000016154781,0.00005389193,0.0000075327966,0.000021237009,0.0027703699,0.000010108323,0.00007533531,0.9848306,0.009114843,0.0028372002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019054704,0.00034554314,0.00021132696,0.000071579285,0.00001595415,0.0000020656582,0.00016022538,0.00033433677,0.00031307674,0.21300462,0.7851171,0.0002336422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001786737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000091095035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92691636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010089541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002077871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016475592","doi":"","title":"Individualidad en la teoría spinoziana de la eternidad de la Mente","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Hermeneutic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.025599368263514753,"score_gpt":0.32525225476701924,"score_spread":0.29965288650350447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016475592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5152313,0.00060374313,0.0000031300253,0.0029930396,0.00040610944,0.00020466585,0.00021207053,0.000086398664,0.48025957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872801,0.0007419033,0.00005401037,0.0016336231,0.0021416084,0.000039731738,0.000018291687,0.00007777925,0.008012961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961607,0.0015942693,0.00042034444,0.000468865,0.00038984287,0.0009660026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738854,0.0010994672,0.00022200593,0.00077423634,0.00004360658,0.00047211788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011897789,0.00046032394,0.00046246088,0.00009632811,0.0011569115,0.0034125529,0.0008820537,0.0004685365,0.0018059065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003135503,0.0004099862,0.00031748333,0.000022009473,0.0017352105,0.0002724972,0.00039437474,0.0008879828,0.00052358647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005645003,0.00059060793,0.012670142,0.00033220384,0.00029043818,0.0003470353,0.0059498465,0.0000019200586,0.00025219098,0.97303104,0.0014604278,0.0050176787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010021025,0.00014563797,0.08927242,0.00045765372,0.00030340606,0.00008241979,0.00022114566,0.000056078534,0.00041901,0.15104401,0.756502,0.0004941319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002776159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010304128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82198703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015507358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015711036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019864957","doi":"10.1017/s0034670520000029","title":"Susan Meld Shell, ed.: The Strauss-Krüger Correspondence: Returning to Plato through Kant. (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Pp. xii, 237.)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shell (structure); Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07320496870611776,"score_gpt":0.2981667926204021,"score_spread":0.22496182391428432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019864957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007701237,0.33476034,0.00012109167,0.29161328,0.0026942831,0.0032124352,0.0017622443,0.0002569307,0.35787818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82345784,0.07587817,0.0001318881,0.0936386,0.0053008813,0.00004585897,0.000059944523,0.00007623943,0.0014105923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970526,0.00036677488,0.00084116176,0.00034600098,0.0006711122,0.000722332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780965,0.0007201894,0.00023232817,0.000725202,0.00017189703,0.00034073577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052093226,0.00037224102,0.000691089,0.000020071238,0.0004073959,0.0000970818,0.0009290657,0.00008014015,0.0067084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004610038,0.00019329667,0.00038132787,0.0001491609,0.0006386223,0.000043665088,0.0002823108,0.00054627925,0.0007256777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002447017,0.000017506754,0.000009468531,0.0013847086,0.00007494342,0.000007921498,0.003609244,0.0000011705826,0.000018424207,0.93862647,0.05578671,0.00043893763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016934132,0.0002124551,0.000024514873,0.002294404,0.00023448114,0.0000130475355,0.0010934889,0.000028148823,0.00021917227,0.12672696,0.8686794,0.00030459627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014295378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007594454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8157566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036097063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007626936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031589012","doi":"10.7202/1069833ar","title":"Laurens van Apeldoorn &amp; Robin Douglass, eds., \"Hobbes on Politics and Religion.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Politics; Theology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09707145238887106,"score_gpt":0.28445531705758936,"score_spread":0.18738386466871831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031589012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024753078,0.2193148,0.0000052624964,0.36107728,0.00073052774,0.0011155226,0.00034045696,0.00023850848,0.41470236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68917847,0.15514174,0.00011152557,0.14829452,0.0060837064,0.00007839271,0.0001760665,0.00008509625,0.0008504907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800104,0.00017446991,0.0006059211,0.0004628111,0.00030536635,0.00045036382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998899,0.0002246151,0.000101837766,0.00033031733,0.00006410277,0.00038014815],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001588871,0.0003442423,0.00063947256,0.00006316429,0.00016129944,0.00008084452,0.00026144573,0.00007804866,0.0013087611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002455713,0.00027034976,0.00020019496,0.00011405968,0.00028869754,0.00012346797,0.00010677504,0.00047197953,0.001166104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015254746,0.0001285374,0.00004403178,0.001800968,0.000023322495,0.0000136475155,0.0004713646,6.2196733e-7,0.0000021315607,0.98291695,0.013790995,0.00079217996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023275064,0.000110161105,0.00001002738,0.001721826,0.000047866615,0.0000035641888,0.0000062632716,0.0000046422133,0.0000032873288,0.29824686,0.6993758,0.00023695419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039710663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020887428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68670315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030348963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020883996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035959231","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000386","title":"Causal Powers as Accidents: Thomas Aquinas’s View","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; The Thing; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06601938636368865,"score_gpt":0.2672337783766281,"score_spread":0.20121439201293945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035959231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04630302,0.0016109863,0.00004541828,0.06855945,0.0033592207,0.00051667873,0.00033683123,0.00045433693,0.87881404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695566,0.00008703692,0.000013778684,0.024227438,0.0037006452,0.000016685553,0.00013254462,0.000028589582,0.0022366298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987051,0.00008751134,0.00026922824,0.0002967178,0.00025664628,0.0003847784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925125,0.00010630156,0.00004868084,0.00017594582,0.000052473883,0.00036537996],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007248823,0.00019903408,0.00026900833,0.000027807691,0.0001874957,0.00014769625,0.00026799808,0.00006450223,0.0066429456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017358163,0.0001600812,0.00016724694,0.000051041614,0.00020803051,0.00018339562,0.00010238345,0.00022339473,0.0042769345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040810104,0.0000804348,0.000102006525,0.000033503224,0.000043933036,0.00005335272,0.004524957,3.9079364e-7,0.000021961141,0.97272265,0.021338712,0.001037291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033385082,0.00018083415,0.00009961982,0.000024377347,0.000034362587,0.0000030810845,0.00027152384,0.000008356758,0.00009221932,0.063743114,0.9349889,0.00021972811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018622384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004957862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92325366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002148282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027190394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99649835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037985538","doi":"10.1111/nbfr.12560","title":"Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, and The Third Man Argument","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Blackfriars","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Scholarship; Articulation (sociology); Epistemology; Argument map; Law; Argumentation theory; Medicine","score_opus":0.04569685101877339,"score_gpt":0.22752183999312092,"score_spread":0.18182498897434754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037985538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026043518,0.0026766264,0.000063403786,0.347819,0.0010641115,0.0006308778,0.00005361068,0.00022545291,0.6214234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629137,0.00016259188,0.000072122086,0.02533165,0.003751422,0.000011452303,0.000011022217,0.000024274537,0.00772176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884313,0.000099788995,0.0002474966,0.00026664976,0.0002489279,0.00029398562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992276,0.00018447204,0.000054721724,0.00019064068,0.0000252137,0.00031734948],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013064002,0.00018309266,0.00025256156,0.000017096378,0.00026699944,0.00019158555,0.00022068959,0.000049587816,0.0015401716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075514574,0.00010756599,0.00012754409,0.000036306035,0.0005715842,0.00009418467,0.00012570606,0.0002556313,0.0004352758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015685285,0.000028518478,0.000013426113,0.000018180852,0.000041576684,0.0000067190394,0.008860392,6.9391416e-7,0.000008586421,0.9354133,0.054544494,0.0009072421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011850417,0.000072002316,0.00004356508,0.000011908375,0.000047457666,0.0000021771539,0.0004868381,0.000079904865,0.000037126058,0.26260802,0.7353022,0.0001237639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015867298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003239217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93687016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013598462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021809836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038055792","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0326","title":"The Moral Sense in the Time of the Recluse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Recluse; Rhetoric; Darwin (ADL); Environmental ethics; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Theology; Linguistics; Poetry","score_opus":0.06630831190702248,"score_gpt":0.2260373133054254,"score_spread":0.1597290013984029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038055792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14018363,0.0036827463,0.0000012456599,0.5139025,0.0012140117,0.00068932166,0.00012264014,0.000053948606,0.34015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926667,0.00012621334,0.0000017606584,0.004998533,0.001824999,0.0000080344025,0.0000020087066,0.000008367288,0.0003633468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902034,0.00019803253,0.00022572784,0.00014396744,0.00022133662,0.00019058744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929166,0.00034390463,0.000059767583,0.00021398687,0.000029354007,0.000061326515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018286367,0.00011853795,0.00014473825,0.000012766914,0.0004114571,0.00005944024,0.00026687776,0.000033792527,0.00010172815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008275334,0.00004720006,0.00010790112,0.000100027275,0.0004611201,0.00006069924,0.00009260085,0.00025500258,0.000045517387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044460292,0.00004740509,0.000070246584,0.000019792884,0.000014319749,0.000003308379,0.00741346,9.635016e-7,0.000008357198,0.9908255,0.0013576341,0.0001945549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031986326,0.00011192808,0.00047240502,0.000029159697,0.00003051656,0.000005179984,0.00028687817,0.00015439923,0.00003060391,0.70938545,0.28905517,0.00011842963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021694084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005717266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8524831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075257926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010566445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31646368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041325515","doi":"10.1007/s11841-020-00775-8","title":"The ‘Magical World’ of Emotions and Its Triumph: on the Ontological Inconsistency in Sartre’s Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sophia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Naturalism; Philosophy; Direct and indirect realism; Determinism; Ontology; Continental philosophy; Psychology; Perception; Computer science","score_opus":0.13471687605272298,"score_gpt":0.26973308653193345,"score_spread":0.13501621047921047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041325515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5805308,0.0008856429,0.00001239248,0.35495985,0.00049873645,0.0011440561,0.0003665971,0.0000317485,0.06157013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968666,0.00003250904,0.0000065640784,0.0019778819,0.0003420195,0.000033032982,0.0000025979393,0.0000074308196,0.0007313563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883646,0.00030077566,0.00034205223,0.00016000035,0.00016025965,0.00020044758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769133,0.0019016039,0.00008467201,0.00018458568,0.00007124532,0.00006658721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030211153,0.00011617744,0.00020564781,0.000024359186,0.00037021207,0.000029557625,0.00025823122,0.000042521213,0.00037274955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006686879,0.00004804602,0.00018854439,0.00010294509,0.0007272977,0.000032728636,0.00008822425,0.0002456545,0.000008226853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009314929,0.00013603432,0.00010096441,0.0000205892,0.000023446633,4.3887303e-7,0.0017896639,0.0000012691339,0.000018851462,0.99702257,0.0004702298,0.00032278686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051118055,0.00022712348,0.010135907,0.00006719215,0.00005017303,0.000001245397,0.0010764939,0.00020540107,0.00008296584,0.949338,0.03820792,0.00009639348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009791884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018576076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41633576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010166616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026225378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4081346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30429852","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2018.02504","title":"La categoría de la vitalidad en el último Croce","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zibaldone","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013407940615778232,"score_gpt":0.2697700938045164,"score_spread":0.2563621531887382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30429852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1956517,0.0001993586,0.00019809463,0.003713697,0.00034807305,0.00009494959,0.00005216511,0.000182392,0.7995596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896446,0.000020646221,0.000084568055,0.0015957047,0.001959355,0.000013653054,0.000020410296,0.00002870506,0.006632353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998709,0.00033531917,0.00019365146,0.0002118257,0.0001800478,0.00037011915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989162,0.00061105605,0.00003780839,0.0002089749,0.00003610513,0.00018987396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004114192,0.00017059287,0.00020116681,0.00004391287,0.00018092338,0.00017620766,0.00021330948,0.00011918725,0.0018638461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013518709,0.00013724419,0.00011493986,0.000030967098,0.00038396273,0.00010568589,0.000069823596,0.00028108468,0.0006074507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017620094,0.00016154267,0.00014912435,0.000032127446,0.000025955766,0.000014251871,0.0023710795,0.0000016978533,0.00010426239,0.9915,0.00406767,0.0015546519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003334176,0.00005235293,0.00072181283,0.000019563915,0.000026941607,0.000017990886,0.00012860434,0.00008093181,0.0002466032,0.22127606,0.7769178,0.00017789056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020440402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015489732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7939929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032692846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018707575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045963797","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12711","title":"Spinoza on the Limits of Explanation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intentionality; Doctrine; Epistemology; Intelligibility (philosophy); Counterintuitive; Philosophy; Psychology; Direct and indirect realism; Perception","score_opus":0.61521691147994,"score_gpt":0.3809295647666574,"score_spread":0.23428734671328255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045963797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042252544,0.0004328735,0.0000030587485,0.20308945,0.000066452354,0.0002716113,0.00005547342,0.00003349033,0.753795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943977,0.0001508193,0.000007974768,0.0039245547,0.0013441012,0.0000265091,0.000007774457,0.000008071803,0.0001324996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839985,0.00029032797,0.00022705295,0.00026775684,0.00049214595,0.00032284638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832267,0.0011601144,0.00003736461,0.00015360733,0.00013035271,0.0001958867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041163343,0.00011936306,0.00018674988,0.0000540338,0.00036597424,0.000063884094,0.00029109584,0.00005832844,0.0022530342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059567246,0.000064497246,0.000061509294,0.000113417926,0.0010492743,0.00006222306,0.0001127272,0.00053847744,0.00021190598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015847,0.00013153774,0.000018491888,0.000035430927,0.000020925183,0.0000033697627,0.0025844406,6.97827e-7,0.000029046689,0.9954251,0.00051893614,0.0010735434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846504,0.0010863359,0.000044772,0.00002172523,0.00000472832,3.4281055e-7,0.00043646403,0.00004658901,0.00008266481,0.91016096,0.08784752,0.00008323823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007780708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.566829e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95214516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011429607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011424616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080778100","doi":"10.7202/1070838ar","title":"Exode, colonie, révolution : Machiavel, Spinoza et la démocratie originaire","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.060322075704520244,"score_gpt":0.302910248457808,"score_spread":0.24258817275328776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080778100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052938823,0.006316149,0.0005165905,0.60499483,0.0028234085,0.0012005895,0.0014644786,0.00069593196,0.3290492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91722393,0.009107864,0.00055060635,0.05687239,0.0088715805,0.00014299942,0.00029035928,0.00016439837,0.006775878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259454,0.0031769145,0.001106961,0.0012257535,0.00064285286,0.0012529767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967103,0.0010565659,0.00038838387,0.00058694684,0.00028157572,0.0009762567],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010537577,0.0010418808,0.0010875099,0.00012841335,0.00054896856,0.0004653219,0.0007992718,0.0011208103,0.0027548254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066861504,0.0009709682,0.00065258576,0.00024118829,0.0018089976,0.0008070168,0.00046478774,0.0030366755,0.0009862825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004456837,0.00088322454,0.00027029586,0.00056270586,0.000222843,0.000474345,0.0023576794,0.00007184054,0.00009663704,0.9700463,0.023943275,0.000625207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008668526,0.0011242386,0.00041304893,0.00028107132,0.00012884258,0.000071024195,0.00008671975,0.0002466169,0.00018544427,0.4119359,0.5839241,0.00073612604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045189008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017835006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021752887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005290145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081438805","doi":"","title":"Absolutist Knowledge and Hermeneutic Faith: Hobbes and Milton on the Problem of Fallen Language","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œalbatross","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Faith; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Politics; Absurdity; Reading (process); Order (exchange); Theology; Hermeneutics; Literature; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04779251178469964,"score_gpt":0.24532320211016,"score_spread":0.19753069032546036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081438805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86737883,0.0042201574,0.0000033770032,0.024587614,0.00014852258,0.00050506013,0.00020170177,0.000064066626,0.102890685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952246,0.00009286441,0.000008206283,0.0018796136,0.0006381506,0.0000152805,0.0000049844843,0.000015715374,0.0021205975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915546,0.00009074742,0.00018483831,0.00019325239,0.00014705736,0.0002286595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940234,0.00026675957,0.000047863974,0.00015168011,0.000027168104,0.00010417463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012173988,0.00014740399,0.00018147384,0.000013066839,0.0002816279,0.00010048552,0.00020365244,0.000037318336,0.00023867242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010662322,0.00007600139,0.00006244523,0.000030579737,0.00059496437,0.000041214957,0.00012990227,0.00018695228,0.00005128395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000812115,0.00012749061,0.0001932468,0.00018720803,0.00007191385,0.000004616166,0.047579855,7.4235504e-7,0.00022594884,0.94486874,0.003730184,0.0029288377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010661971,0.0007671328,0.0025769584,0.00014969496,0.00013129703,0.000008809219,0.0059288843,0.00035188926,0.0004764888,0.07551333,0.91261446,0.000414856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007504882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017619577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9088843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007600669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009142785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3099247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084410903","doi":"10.1177/0090591720952056","title":"Laughing with Leviathan: Hobbesian Laughter in Theory and Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Rhetoric; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Adversary; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05017537227571865,"score_gpt":0.2822843875170103,"score_spread":0.23210901524129163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084410903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032497954,0.0009709518,0.00058467843,0.08293353,0.00020915712,0.00037070032,0.00009924263,0.00019023193,0.88214356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96189785,0.000015352756,0.00015069605,0.035647076,0.0014078609,0.000015522592,0.00000809475,0.000034725726,0.0008227969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974875,0.00094226917,0.0002797063,0.00036615826,0.0002374237,0.00068695383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954898,0.0036990806,0.000040558043,0.00017387398,0.00005215578,0.00054456585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096121,0.0002331608,0.0003007796,0.000050720086,0.00013992141,0.00015089751,0.0001645569,0.00007186495,0.0017652937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016283456,0.00016342213,0.00006517039,0.00005749451,0.00084398116,0.0003546138,0.00010287992,0.00043096757,0.00018690832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007333075,0.00012941707,0.000061010793,0.000057355846,0.000038736493,0.00008259044,0.0055396813,2.1455035e-7,0.000012604428,0.9927638,0.00010431705,0.00047693576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005625575,0.00021643148,0.0001268698,0.00006403268,0.00006180688,0.000037775768,0.004690635,0.000012190677,0.000055766337,0.85217035,0.14173156,0.00027001888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003433189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009592034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029935336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026836942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084659787","doi":"","title":"Review of \"Steven Nadler, L’eresia di Spinoza: l’immortalità e lo spirito ebraico\"","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04147805631421449,"score_gpt":0.29621628098964925,"score_spread":0.2547382246754348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084659787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07270158,0.4343753,0.000041065672,0.021368505,0.00563018,0.0021411679,0.0010522808,0.00024156742,0.46244836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94236493,0.028046472,0.00004314517,0.012297608,0.00566898,0.000017440134,0.0001930435,0.000119212025,0.011249172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483764,0.0002216074,0.001909604,0.0007664042,0.00088087766,0.0013838671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698037,0.00041213777,0.0005076117,0.0010088611,0.00034626125,0.00074475765],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011398891,0.00071641913,0.0013315738,0.00019251295,0.00038336022,0.00015518721,0.0007708705,0.00030117313,0.008118952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026269016,0.00061325193,0.0008565923,0.00030826876,0.0009457379,0.00032909948,0.00026513758,0.00069196394,0.0009602345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010087851,0.0010273552,0.00052793673,0.010532884,0.0004281628,0.00012983668,0.0008538997,1.6994457e-7,0.00009917647,0.95907456,0.02149265,0.0057324693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008246529,0.0005003792,0.003205532,0.011292257,0.0004609507,0.000030316382,0.00022586201,0.000003739346,0.00051861507,0.016835164,0.96533847,0.0007640393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043192456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008473733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94384587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105143605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010538594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085398481","doi":"10.29173/spectrum80","title":"The “Absence of Chance” and the “Serving of Ends”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Instinct; Foundation (evidence); Nothing; Teleology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.03452152088224806,"score_gpt":0.21561758089848485,"score_spread":0.1810960600162368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085398481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24772666,0.006835268,0.000037688293,0.37064162,0.0008855876,0.0004719234,0.000104851264,0.00005683068,0.37323958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801207,0.00019864591,0.0000042406405,0.0008886862,0.00058419554,0.0000026404348,6.1375846e-7,0.000004255056,0.00030466792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994835,0.00004107068,0.00015757067,0.00007927124,0.00011089025,0.00012769707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995344,0.00024193905,0.000057967478,0.00010962616,0.000016513295,0.00003954044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010468632,0.000058048172,0.00012716152,0.0000055878827,0.00014488268,0.000022781005,0.00016192699,0.000011840947,0.000304894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060815615,0.000026849211,0.00005769819,0.000025385798,0.00071044365,0.000030144216,0.00007287628,0.000088381326,0.000007900305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054289067,0.000007750991,0.000041645988,0.000023947794,0.000015394893,3.3119773e-7,0.0033278766,2.2997304e-7,0.000041713814,0.9961091,0.00013114582,0.00024653462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005940183,0.00013424258,0.00048514368,0.00003762239,0.000020261155,0.0000011107758,0.0013458435,0.0003466719,0.0025868644,0.78405017,0.21030605,0.000092010385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006153291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003312725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7502854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000020890147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005839587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33383754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090725951","doi":"10.4324/9781315210049-4","title":"The Findings: Realist Lore and Liberal Principles: Another Case for Muted Optimism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimism; Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12592770888823945,"score_gpt":0.274252100695691,"score_spread":0.14832439180745155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090725951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003714718,0.00055656984,0.000015281175,0.006015349,0.00061894057,0.00059394323,0.0008765781,0.000072735034,0.99121344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025488085,0.00022481444,0.00010077206,0.0013063857,0.0027376718,0.00003871446,0.0001025114,0.000079737794,0.99286056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876,0.00001229889,0.00034002584,0.00036606277,0.00016178639,0.00035985978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987875,0.00034065216,0.00013894998,0.00048648354,0.00010162761,0.00014474333],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015084888,0.00036355716,0.00034474375,0.000037058926,0.0014896973,0.0006604606,0.00026787387,0.00021605959,0.0021784932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004469901,0.00021033776,0.00023392432,0.0000014619642,0.0009698868,0.000093503164,0.00013480119,0.00028986146,0.000051595234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000479903,0.000013547699,3.3534656e-7,0.00006189886,0.00011679185,0.00012820952,0.00061152404,7.395065e-8,1.3078103e-7,0.9796197,0.018306455,0.0010933669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002533009,0.000082801605,5.137146e-7,0.00007854845,0.00007241007,0.000098766446,0.00003772972,0.000035849967,0.0000015436121,0.29910254,0.70000184,0.00023416446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000902444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005433919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6816954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027423326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025403864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094092452","doi":"10.25145/j.laguna.2020.46.06","title":"La prevalencia como precursor ético primordial. (De Spinoza a Damasio)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroethics; Natural (archaeology); Order (exchange); Epistemology; Philosophy; Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Neuroscience; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05428141356565802,"score_gpt":0.262150651822375,"score_spread":0.207869238256717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094092452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31633827,0.0065588807,0.00034110673,0.048070237,0.0007087598,0.0019024488,0.001426815,0.0011616381,0.6234918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98659056,0.00022655935,0.00025630117,0.0073153046,0.003233648,0.00004761645,0.00005600612,0.00006462672,0.0022093565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760693,0.00040727356,0.0004761183,0.00046198306,0.00035523402,0.00069247925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984584,0.000325199,0.00012510402,0.00036299197,0.00008747942,0.00064085046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032715523,0.00034077174,0.00048859237,0.00004478317,0.00024343112,0.00039820338,0.00047868674,0.00015186566,0.0049103172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005138316,0.00029366472,0.0003193443,0.00009378909,0.0003710032,0.00017818721,0.00015710466,0.00055027066,0.0008795488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070838054,0.00024513697,0.00066794845,0.00078627333,0.00008175675,0.000048755403,0.0045982236,0.0000018918598,0.00012899697,0.97668797,0.014933898,0.0017483218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005449806,0.00025433578,0.0006835029,0.00028311939,0.00014749834,0.000017327837,0.00013276603,0.00025060642,0.00013888969,0.026324896,0.97079605,0.00042603392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031013842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037609072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95586216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102065525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121854035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094144381","doi":"","title":"Spinoza’s Authority Volume II: Resistance and Power in the Political Treatises","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Western Sydney; Royal Holloway, University of London; York University","keywords":"Politics; Resistance (ecology); Power (physics); Volume (thermodynamics); Political authority; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Physics; Thermodynamics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03627693300994447,"score_gpt":0.25461281293921534,"score_spread":0.21833587992927087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094144381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009223986,0.0008544436,0.0000013809492,0.07109811,0.0011763589,0.00075542944,0.00028400568,0.00013335173,0.9247745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18249708,0.00024507713,0.00005852547,0.009698536,0.005887373,0.000114560964,0.00066779525,0.00012336906,0.8007077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565285,0.00032797165,0.0009155873,0.0010508435,0.000941682,0.0011110784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771726,0.0006093314,0.00025003523,0.00081023754,0.00023377861,0.00037935947],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004990093,0.00083865214,0.0008346012,0.00026382552,0.0014078096,0.00058340497,0.000749991,0.0004321037,0.014504595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037969294,0.00062522327,0.00031158433,0.00010571822,0.003228371,0.00047406502,0.00021028522,0.0010600116,0.00095964863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008142831,0.00018040327,0.00003561339,0.00010852196,0.000105365194,0.000027889226,0.0034941095,7.1802354e-8,0.0000016391741,0.9574999,0.037857845,0.0006071755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043719812,0.00020122217,0.00028776276,0.000196469,0.00014169661,0.000009598457,0.0004849269,0.000003056273,0.0000010418606,0.3149582,0.68272966,0.0005491599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000150768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014424621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64487183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004538602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027734847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105123942","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.2","title":"Natural Rights and Natural Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Law; Private property; Natural (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Politics; Property rights; Institution; Relevance (law); Political science; Political philosophy; Property law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.04153733218192515,"score_gpt":0.2487236682929578,"score_spread":0.20718633611103265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105123942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009158584,0.012777739,4.5294132e-7,0.005233982,0.0059975814,0.00020566233,0.00038046922,0.00018525118,0.9751273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24879524,0.0021335538,0.00006637044,0.012497043,0.017027594,0.000015023011,0.0014483725,0.00005645069,0.71796036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981693,0.00006925427,0.0003927191,0.00051993754,0.00038376055,0.00046505115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991832,0.0001546033,0.00008382081,0.00020304826,0.00008060879,0.00029475364],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000036000478,0.00046512956,0.0005841678,0.000050535946,0.00038518105,0.00035940565,0.00027467054,0.0002110341,0.0070571364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014743467,0.00028920532,0.00023208381,0.000025866337,0.0006152421,0.00016470127,0.00019634528,0.0012379313,0.00050255016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017713508,0.000026732223,2.1066954e-7,0.00011142879,0.00008429787,0.0000205157,0.00036922478,1.9591022e-9,6.1499435e-8,0.72926,0.26919723,0.00091257715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021186631,0.00004566261,0.0000015510942,0.00010407299,0.00007361485,0.000006702976,0.000033629236,0.000012150353,0.0000045551965,0.21998739,0.7791572,0.00036160674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005671132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005317203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033695782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002675865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107484652","doi":"","title":"Thomas Hobbes, Comedian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Contempt; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Laughter; Harm; Politics; Reputation; Law; Racism; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.11231554403286571,"score_gpt":0.296006524206292,"score_spread":0.18369098017342628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107484652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034253816,0.001804291,0.000033006527,0.47582668,0.001221137,0.0004065743,0.000062374595,0.00014021518,0.51708037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933668,0.000113882146,0.000035875113,0.061444186,0.003931788,0.000013990488,0.0000027920057,0.000011134131,0.0007783509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754936,0.000107478176,0.00030702783,0.00031466392,0.00060391816,0.0011175863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805164,0.00023172119,0.00003676699,0.0003062643,0.00018524026,0.0011883914],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005140816,0.00016399652,0.0002625894,0.000023681529,0.00059055357,0.00022934981,0.0008454426,0.000025591038,0.0035977091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015369188,0.00008309406,0.00015303631,0.00020515277,0.0039312933,0.00021299659,0.00021039956,0.00027863117,0.0021824397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027672966,0.00003054051,0.000021372995,0.000030406683,0.000003901601,0.000002375632,0.00065925956,4.030401e-8,0.000014618787,0.99460304,0.0036151668,0.0010165107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935369,0.000056744237,0.00009725811,0.00003204902,0.000024031444,0.0000025133106,0.00024625688,0.00005761254,0.0000710695,0.16468301,0.83452773,0.0001323771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075211115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069680727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005090335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089087356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110192423","doi":"10.7202/1074036ar","title":"Dana Villa, \"Teachers of the People: Political Education in Rousseau, Hegel, Tocqueville, and Mill.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Mill; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04621827607839693,"score_gpt":0.2757918997365367,"score_spread":0.2295736236581398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110192423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05959938,0.20039833,0.0000011598986,0.44588384,0.0005699397,0.001785511,0.00009991746,0.000042966745,0.29161894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96938884,0.007742032,0.000014911433,0.022057975,0.0006739285,0.000042938907,0.000010790109,0.000016480923,0.000052121195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983869,0.00025070817,0.0005636972,0.00027434702,0.00022584572,0.00029850827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992949,0.00013585057,0.000089562534,0.00023711965,0.00004817518,0.00019440326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018240024,0.00018779606,0.00048649067,0.00004378884,0.000055454602,0.000022010618,0.00025222593,0.000050085884,0.00047260677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029991803,0.00012635198,0.0001399444,0.00017708102,0.0002567572,0.00010593406,0.00010272546,0.00030544196,0.0000276448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008319514,0.00015362275,0.0019835052,0.0019016323,0.000009392008,0.0000011104361,0.0012918435,2.0020289e-7,0.0000023479427,0.99211246,0.0006384685,0.0018971243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006120581,0.00015477704,0.0073789237,0.0063205464,0.00011034985,0.000008709113,0.0003819623,0.000028335196,0.000016771412,0.49929994,0.48523083,0.00045681116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023433178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011854408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90978944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044317727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087149005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51747125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128286846","doi":"10.1525/rh.2021.39.1.121","title":"Review: <i>Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Thomas Hobbes</i>, by Timothy Raylor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Theology","score_opus":0.03096362036852181,"score_gpt":0.24400880224809934,"score_spread":0.21304518187957752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128286846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006159156,0.23855214,0.000025400117,0.045756504,0.0023870636,0.0003286027,0.000346086,0.00022284448,0.71176547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37531987,0.24100459,0.00046432822,0.09985962,0.02000193,0.00023202383,0.0008103939,0.00029106622,0.26201618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981799,0.00013751116,0.00040532832,0.00048888027,0.000325594,0.00046277163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988306,0.00018568791,0.00008286696,0.00039330678,0.0001664896,0.00034106013],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014179251,0.0002915089,0.00046686636,0.00003408989,0.00033373846,0.00013130145,0.00018620637,0.000085190644,0.0029836753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013478997,0.0002397852,0.00018654323,0.000111956084,0.00022015102,0.00018353836,0.00014253415,0.00028745114,0.00041291863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009186509,0.00016693775,0.000014667686,0.000355303,0.00003922091,0.000021648433,0.00025032109,1.9468525e-8,0.00007428131,0.55291355,0.445127,0.00102784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003023717,0.0000750153,0.0000053995805,0.00033260873,0.000074440904,0.000018915227,0.000025812415,0.000003279098,0.00020203895,0.046033837,0.95261514,0.00031117044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024906287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004278736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50748813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054749526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033793905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132663856","doi":"10.7202/1076216ar","title":"Alexandre Matheron, \"Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza.\" Trans. David Maruzzella and Gil Morejón. Filippo del Lucchese, David Maruzzella and Gil Morejon (Eds.)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Politics; Humanities; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0539374489682946,"score_gpt":0.2826015780110846,"score_spread":0.22866412904279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132663856","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06325804,0.80438644,0.0000026942664,0.03367856,0.00045107753,0.0010271771,0.00035186223,0.00006961664,0.09677454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6377473,0.35058412,0.0001682949,0.0070372885,0.0012737749,0.00013867335,0.00016001608,0.000096567135,0.0027939794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964913,0.00048132744,0.0010532644,0.00092692487,0.00026056825,0.00078660395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843264,0.00037991337,0.00013436505,0.0005003337,0.00013167808,0.00042104797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047709912,0.00059543183,0.0013096825,0.00016949995,0.00019874684,0.000116173054,0.0002518569,0.00022794114,0.0014046566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013862013,0.00052164245,0.00017921721,0.00017803758,0.000933793,0.00021990351,0.00023150486,0.0006460439,0.000043884174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058042668,0.000757246,0.00202608,0.011404776,0.0001012021,0.00027499587,0.0027556347,3.3820243e-7,0.000030539013,0.9625319,0.001251772,0.018807422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018833021,0.00020150555,0.0025517377,0.005701413,0.00023032531,0.0001901554,0.00015241573,0.0000703226,0.000034689812,0.2723278,0.71580154,0.0008547738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001755184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000484734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7145498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006364983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000781899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132855684","doi":"10.5325/miltonstudies.63.1.0001","title":"The Pleasure of Milton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Milton Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Meaning (existential); Poetry; Reading (process); Value (mathematics); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Psychology; Art; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.15559961222028537,"score_gpt":0.3158371512461978,"score_spread":0.16023753902591245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132855684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2215936,0.2028067,0.000005284438,0.05098198,0.0048927623,0.0003027544,0.00020391459,0.00014219708,0.5190708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621099,0.0029550106,0.000019198771,0.00087832747,0.0010121372,0.000015049683,0.000006044207,0.000011928391,0.0329924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990689,0.00008152278,0.0002490426,0.00014771476,0.00022362017,0.00022916176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989948,0.00039714677,0.0000482396,0.00021697007,0.0002995895,0.000043213295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013421963,0.00011476205,0.00023126246,0.000013850418,0.0004719087,0.000036496713,0.00012144365,0.000023944809,0.00034460868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021891206,0.00006528538,0.00014040223,0.000032105752,0.00059847726,0.000039384668,0.000117693635,0.000112379515,0.00006809805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018505458,0.00007267844,0.000083535684,0.000055109693,0.00023858342,0.000008441699,0.0061475374,2.9792238e-7,0.00006851577,0.97322327,0.01851173,0.0015718011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015710661,0.000038839942,0.00018387732,0.000041980606,0.00004057266,0.0000017536171,0.0050243884,0.0000017237312,0.0020469194,0.07878358,0.91359216,0.0000871093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013084682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013993407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89508045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013938668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017054243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37732235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143062287","doi":"10.3138/ecf.33.3.475","title":"<i>Anecdotes of Enlightenment: Human Nature from Locke to Wordsworth</i> by James Robert Wood","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Art history; Literature; Art; Classics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011711429112450891,"score_gpt":0.23022624786148513,"score_spread":0.21851481874903422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143062287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7387201,0.056304943,0.000106584484,0.010899785,0.008605513,0.0010272015,0.003738427,0.000494323,0.18010311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873813,0.001880471,0.00021224201,0.0032141272,0.0025860835,0.000042492004,0.001860147,0.000067836096,0.0027553088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692035,0.00017105223,0.0007621226,0.0007815914,0.00074194313,0.0006229707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983519,0.00018098878,0.00020532799,0.00060458074,0.00027566377,0.00038159243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011598128,0.00046097292,0.0005728348,0.00012549547,0.0004678359,0.00019168034,0.0003506545,0.00031832478,0.008587067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058940415,0.00040793413,0.0003592718,0.00020477986,0.0001954443,0.00030685254,0.00018612779,0.00067224936,0.00022154632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019318846,0.0024612437,0.0005974852,0.00011388618,0.00049587566,0.00005785753,0.004554159,0.0000050058097,0.01320179,0.6033525,0.37014228,0.0048247203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007103338,0.00016665603,0.00017843391,0.00017805856,0.00013588977,0.000004704564,0.0006790332,0.0000098847195,0.03890712,0.0058216956,0.9527294,0.0004787735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003267562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007449583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5975308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011031226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037429723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146506616","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12280","title":"Debating ethical nominalism in Early Enlightenment thought on China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Enlightenment; Universalism; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Relativism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05935979418168738,"score_gpt":0.3092899873389791,"score_spread":0.24993019315729173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146506616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618124,0.0002969747,0.000058623336,0.024504578,0.0017148174,0.00021526219,0.000100440324,0.000014990911,0.011281949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920528,0.000027253172,0.000058110767,0.0011833594,0.0025849326,0.000014507041,0.0000051760735,0.000022380209,0.0040514804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983182,0.00037028416,0.000471133,0.00014631117,0.00036476745,0.00032929465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987373,0.0007565832,0.00017568661,0.0001148341,0.00012855101,0.00008705391],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012556519,0.00015596843,0.00029303678,0.00004882721,0.0008016945,0.00011620975,0.0002509273,0.00013890429,0.00092541904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018980495,0.00009971902,0.00038542037,0.000045674697,0.00030470546,0.000068718255,0.00005323665,0.0010085088,0.000012449362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025340286,0.0002631138,0.00013106545,0.000013558538,0.00004951486,0.000029372291,0.018275246,0.0000013984409,0.00007825352,0.9777839,0.00036281106,0.0027583286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013079359,0.0003555314,0.012064749,0.0001477954,0.00020988753,0.000038750193,0.0074679446,0.000009816263,0.0013786221,0.9385055,0.038248327,0.00026519873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002227115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017555845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039278492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007080148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044953726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159131685","doi":"10.29173/psur222","title":"Virtue and Virtu: A Debate in the Importance of Values and Justice for Leaders of State","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Sociology; Through-the-lens metering; Aesthetics; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Lens (geology); Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08518869577663757,"score_gpt":0.3383092607252669,"score_spread":0.25312056494862933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159131685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38083968,0.1529638,0.00029716262,0.40133145,0.00070446485,0.002478678,0.0006294877,0.000049983686,0.060705297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823911,0.010737041,0.00009789401,0.0065822992,0.000059358234,0.000017121713,0.00000396488,0.0000059582994,0.000105273146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836504,0.0001226621,0.00045383268,0.0002716661,0.0003109249,0.00047585706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856454,0.0008255865,0.00007986675,0.00018529958,0.00016191367,0.00018281174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009316647,0.00012137988,0.0003828238,0.00004765784,0.00013973712,0.000043425407,0.0001885097,0.000017344437,0.000026180172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010417172,0.00007470892,0.00007479182,0.00019918103,0.0034251884,0.00015990867,0.000071495844,0.0001007491,0.0000012146504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004314634,0.00006641452,0.0000740612,0.0019639996,0.000008577342,0.0000030295432,0.0005154324,1.6906579e-7,0.000045725137,0.996443,0.000046687477,0.0008285892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024390305,0.00011973926,0.0006410999,0.0013869237,0.00022497997,0.000016508215,0.0014967865,0.00026206736,0.00024685214,0.98631954,0.008889813,0.00015178007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004994734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051968436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6015514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021946138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009931897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160305191","doi":"","title":"Thucydide en Angleterre. Luca Iori, Thucydides Anglicus. Gli Eight Books di Thomas Hobbes e la ricezione delle Storie di Tucidide (1450-1642), Roma Edizioni di storia e litteratura, collana Pleiadi, 19, 2015)","year":2016,"lang":"it","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.01845064746047425,"score_gpt":0.23371006779004083,"score_spread":0.21525942032956658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160305191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16126816,0.039403655,0.011612572,0.11958483,0.014806719,0.005147796,0.0090414025,0.0018822667,0.6372526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88075906,0.0054120724,0.001426043,0.00064387266,0.0036240944,0.00038508917,0.0020065766,0.00031526032,0.10542792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97841597,0.013029519,0.002196173,0.0025696666,0.0017888732,0.0019998117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806467,0.009187774,0.0014243074,0.004217899,0.0029935,0.0015298197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057964735,0.0018494532,0.0018948645,0.0005425857,0.0027466526,0.002565959,0.0034064953,0.0012569344,0.0019457153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026365502,0.001552924,0.001264505,0.00046864134,0.0019205061,0.0007475536,0.0030813727,0.0023417932,0.0004169672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002598947,0.0020740593,0.0022010878,0.0005879654,0.00082815293,0.00012130564,0.026499722,0.0000074730106,0.0013931681,0.9244817,0.036703095,0.0048423912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017859259,0.00001539294,0.002564763,0.004468717,0.00048109677,0.000052508505,0.0006652837,0.00054616015,0.007241388,0.052529063,0.9275007,0.0021489966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032780007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002275075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086449226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007063397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165121497","doi":"","title":"Spinoza’s Authority in the Treatises: An Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Western Sydney; Royal Holloway, University of London; York University","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05847216696471918,"score_gpt":0.29123566628603015,"score_spread":0.23276349932131096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165121497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3246314,0.000107265536,0.00002502408,0.16084671,0.0046552457,0.0010582923,0.000053594027,0.00036146218,0.508261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772615,0.00003196188,0.00008465102,0.0046011936,0.01590012,0.00007069951,0.00023571975,0.000033212844,0.0017809715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974453,0.0003585704,0.00050196116,0.00061437045,0.00052056584,0.00055924914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987654,0.0001498523,0.000112538364,0.0006198825,0.00018496718,0.00016735712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059434096,0.0003300484,0.00028630716,0.00017224235,0.0009858994,0.00044571716,0.0005307461,0.000099606135,0.014149606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018119364,0.00023328129,0.0001275394,0.00023370162,0.0012725868,0.0010141012,0.00004569655,0.00038156362,0.0011032702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007848278,0.0003603961,0.00020613223,0.000014721164,0.000032504748,0.0000044369344,0.012139343,0.0000014599581,0.00010283374,0.97235584,0.0013492448,0.013354594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006504736,0.0004904976,0.0037224584,0.00001653627,0.00006614514,0.000016879127,0.0031180247,0.00008373801,0.00006517882,0.10547355,0.88589597,0.00040056324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034479538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014400751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8845467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001378353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005317202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165263521","doi":"10.1017/9781108778879.008","title":"Locke and a ‘More Liberal’ Hobbism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Politics; Reputation; Liberalism; Sovereignty; Fallacy; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Religious studies; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04599086829595537,"score_gpt":0.1954271684915393,"score_spread":0.14943630019558393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165263521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000075631964,0.0003870997,0.0000050113576,0.0009660283,0.0003298758,0.0002767865,0.0007750428,0.00016382511,0.9970207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032582656,0.00012987595,0.000012360316,0.0013792877,0.0012337638,6.05062e-7,0.00008967925,0.000052336683,0.99384385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878395,0.00002712748,0.00018087609,0.00049343857,0.00023330071,0.00028133707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990777,0.00007094446,0.000104873456,0.00027455276,0.00008690417,0.00038502965],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000027135762,0.000395292,0.00044568532,0.000076584714,0.00029011807,0.00011473259,0.00029453542,0.0002252095,0.000098054355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065704776,0.0003987571,0.0002283066,0.0000023423877,0.0008190478,0.00008316499,0.0003870729,0.00057829573,0.000063725245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006651225,0.000009988648,2.2951801e-7,0.00011721365,0.00013066732,0.0002728793,0.0004410859,1.802056e-8,0.0000017512859,0.9417854,0.056786004,0.00038822583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042351958,0.000076699966,0.000001920135,0.00013440115,0.000232692,0.000009208852,0.000059809314,0.0000092641985,0.000016564574,0.001582186,0.99699974,0.0004540057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005175597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002133153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94021374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005286845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033993656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165962043","doi":"10.3138/utq.90.1.03","title":"Identity over Time in <i>Paradise Lost</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Representation (politics); Constitution; Paradise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; History; Law; Politics; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.014866738821263725,"score_gpt":0.20813925472156247,"score_spread":0.19327251590029876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165962043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4855413,0.0010057227,0.000028506593,0.0012719297,0.00041648507,0.000114021335,0.00018875334,0.000039676794,0.5113936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730867,0.000037975457,0.000054202057,0.00022533048,0.00021357027,7.383577e-8,0.000026920743,0.000006801261,0.026348418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929196,0.000066666165,0.000121868514,0.00017443992,0.00016200253,0.00018306094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959177,0.000043137403,0.00004039268,0.00017181585,0.000060269766,0.000092590504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000051810068,0.000089821086,0.0001867079,0.000016731852,0.000074248994,0.000029130822,0.00016281765,0.00004266006,0.035892606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049840355,0.00010111185,0.00012374872,0.00001716555,0.00016319517,0.00061754475,0.000028948305,0.000072454146,0.00038419713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086169945,0.00050372264,0.00045592492,0.00004415201,0.000052559895,0.0001623982,0.0212364,5.675035e-7,0.00020357996,0.9699003,0.0058879503,0.0014662845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022793014,0.0004468365,0.011602775,0.00012106134,0.000095114876,0.000005412323,0.00817368,0.00016672861,0.000066003005,0.06496657,0.9115812,0.0004952988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065111546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028063243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9056933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009086001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026927439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98967206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176501039","doi":"10.1086/714238","title":"The Encounter of Faith and Reason in the Western Tradition and Its Significance Today","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Biography; Classics; Transcription (linguistics); Epistemology; Literature; History; Art; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03143743539345363,"score_gpt":0.24480709498931952,"score_spread":0.2133696595958659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176501039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599613,0.010167985,0.0000062138624,0.025809713,0.00019099146,0.00007623564,0.000008711405,0.0000017962403,0.003777038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917395,0.0069505316,0.0000017527426,0.0006724934,0.00038622553,8.62122e-7,5.952423e-7,0.0000035014764,0.0002445545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992423,0.00022227725,0.00022454903,0.000044636097,0.00018020763,0.00008601734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992335,0.00046700024,0.00012098509,0.00007599986,0.000076548844,0.000026002379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051358854,0.000058197475,0.00010541365,0.000014956813,0.00012602416,0.00006010648,0.000106440246,0.000019253259,0.000010492848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004569599,0.0000233304,0.00003696627,0.000025555579,0.0001442961,0.0000932515,0.000014745571,0.00018189625,0.0000011292145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037922992,0.00015049198,0.00040329725,0.00007196853,0.000057496603,0.000032300468,0.02575022,0.0000051311954,0.0008124782,0.96474516,0.005266054,0.002326188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015757802,0.0010007975,0.01108233,0.0008809934,0.00024058766,0.00072082697,0.008103382,0.00012966222,0.0033121798,0.4783086,0.49438938,0.0002554827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027039054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006009191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48912334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000076280526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014082066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096928865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202198325","doi":"10.7202/1081495ar","title":"Homer like Thucydides? Hobbes and the Translation of the Homeric Poems as an Educational Tool","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TTR traduction terminologie rédaction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Period (music); Literature; Virtue; Nothing; Political philosophy; Ancient Greek; Philosophy; Poetry; Classics; Amusement; History; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Art; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08702341891611441,"score_gpt":0.29028742738098123,"score_spread":0.2032640084648668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202198325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622272,0.00092067913,0.000029460349,0.027165465,0.0027278685,0.00027288104,0.000026526595,0.000064535874,0.006565365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498934,0.00043074283,0.000033580884,0.00051158917,0.0010985957,0.000032395765,0.00003785653,0.000011501126,0.0028544026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884224,0.00023563454,0.00029086374,0.00024071749,0.00022135978,0.00016919326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999257,0.00020931807,0.00012373795,0.0002637263,0.00010628783,0.000039917344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013782742,0.00013716117,0.0001775204,0.000047016772,0.0003900786,0.000095275966,0.00012013197,0.000068809815,0.000824108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006763795,0.00007974051,0.00013456,0.000088358225,0.0007634179,0.00038160742,0.000020155518,0.00020991503,0.000019459449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020816394,0.00040578604,0.00031284898,0.000058383946,0.000089144356,9.2429656e-7,0.006907844,0.00001031523,0.0014216155,0.92256856,0.00041403426,0.06760239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026445198,0.0003056686,0.045561705,0.00008267544,0.00036785472,0.00028045653,0.0063127214,0.00031748982,0.010119708,0.67436343,0.25909218,0.00055160176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013266903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003588731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25867814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003473507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006027558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205125088","doi":"10.1080/24740500.2021.1962651","title":"A Qualified Defence of Rationalism: On the Role of the Analogical Imagination in Spinoza","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Philosophical Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Analogical reasoning; Imagination; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Analogy","score_opus":0.09272277627373084,"score_gpt":0.2813563435251592,"score_spread":0.18863356725142838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205125088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021314654,0.0053293374,0.0000027186777,0.90764266,0.00011192896,0.0009329008,0.00011868362,0.000022805973,0.06452429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862594,0.00083923736,0.000006630908,0.012445736,0.00037226733,0.000027453667,0.000010441023,0.0000089375235,0.00002986599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980619,0.00035765694,0.00066798215,0.00023500383,0.00047980988,0.00019765268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989882,0.00032868603,0.00020182063,0.00027395153,0.00010026336,0.00010704882],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002908316,0.00016984495,0.0004012333,0.00002391539,0.00007535701,0.000017658493,0.00046854425,0.000055268203,0.0015206701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007629662,0.000085934975,0.000273075,0.00021867243,0.00060281344,0.000076134034,0.00007051504,0.0004034937,0.000052376432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019293266,0.00013379949,0.00014183707,0.00029157058,0.0000132217965,0.0000013584608,0.000337893,0.0000015940163,0.000058407062,0.9982832,0.00020714437,0.0005106889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020662011,0.00015877826,0.001368658,0.0014290239,0.00005620478,0.0000019496456,0.00007383842,0.000047828726,0.00046199322,0.9501168,0.04593773,0.00014055322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013675066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037614143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015965992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032810633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206405714","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2021.1979297","title":"The colonial difference in Hugo Grotius: rational man, slavery and Indigenous dispossession","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postcolonial Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Colonialism; Sovereignty; Indigenous; Historiography; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Law; State (computer science); Mythology; Ideology; Humanism; History; Legal history; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Classics","score_opus":0.04996601099127814,"score_gpt":0.29528800597780946,"score_spread":0.24532199498653132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206405714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96977574,0.007139085,0.0000010295322,0.019532213,0.0010415203,0.00022581522,0.000054920234,0.000026889564,0.002202767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423313,0.0016049842,0.000011494524,0.0009478628,0.00095176935,0.000059542504,0.0000142567105,0.000009250099,0.0021677339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987891,0.00013685762,0.00026917626,0.00023810356,0.00022627114,0.000340494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989546,0.00068750203,0.00005096495,0.00010895704,0.00013421007,0.00006374946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013671826,0.00015670822,0.00023803637,0.0000252044,0.0011023113,0.00016922544,0.00010619699,0.000045335342,0.00008375147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024195436,0.00009813451,0.00005715676,0.00005051405,0.000588772,0.00008632898,0.00021153543,0.00019386665,0.00002228639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022211407,0.0003018124,0.011462368,0.00006260806,0.00014981125,0.00012083625,0.035811976,0.000001068444,0.00010114699,0.94764817,0.0006203637,0.0034977363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019981458,0.00055803225,0.3064452,0.00025063727,0.00010480893,0.000038888305,0.006475865,0.0000368896,0.0003771613,0.34760633,0.33542287,0.00068516243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014812815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00506276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6000418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057309066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051761443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84781986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211384061","doi":"10.7202/1083168ar","title":"“Wise Passiveness”: Wordsworth, Spinoza, and the Ethics of Passivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lumen Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Passivity; Opposition (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Poetry; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; Art; Political science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05201913599315245,"score_gpt":0.2679479879063296,"score_spread":0.21592885191317718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211384061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44984043,0.17246413,0.000018482438,0.3490821,0.004727624,0.0040017786,0.0044383495,0.00028582994,0.015141247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971439,0.017598564,0.00022648775,0.0075154826,0.0019466969,0.00024945443,0.0001476058,0.000055691442,0.0008210301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741554,0.00014940265,0.00055983756,0.0005621039,0.00050661614,0.0008065058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99517834,0.0021373327,0.0002820786,0.00025094702,0.001843085,0.00030821943],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008373688,0.0004174345,0.00071320875,0.000032555767,0.0027762668,0.00032378946,0.00043085543,0.00023321237,0.00016488384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011972671,0.0002488726,0.00057404925,0.00032262906,0.0027175928,0.00020720028,0.0001920182,0.00077221193,0.0000043837654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016168095,0.00008520709,0.0014014671,0.0002665594,0.002404365,0.0000026725565,0.062012754,2.4196189e-7,0.000046258618,0.8614059,0.07141711,0.00079576625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021661678,0.0000827737,0.001127113,0.00026532056,0.00071666384,0.000004933113,0.02783123,0.000066282206,0.00041509682,0.0728488,0.89400136,0.00047424817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009159739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047269773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023224826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004996305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211552095","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2021.50","title":"Masculine Power? A Gendered Look at the Frontispiece of Hobbes's<i>Leviathan</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Sovereignty; Reading (process); Power (physics); Subject (documents); Prism; Politics; Political philosophy; Facet (psychology); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.03862434674684243,"score_gpt":0.22846164454598614,"score_spread":0.1898372977991437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211552095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49644282,0.015203581,0.00018169047,0.025288947,0.0027704383,0.00052483915,0.0010374796,0.0001442833,0.4584059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97736263,0.00011250568,0.000069974645,0.0025019473,0.0006109916,0.000012872608,0.00008231091,0.000021307049,0.019225467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987588,0.000105702326,0.00032043064,0.00023901892,0.00028595395,0.00029012904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991293,0.00013455284,0.000081780854,0.00041641737,0.0001369343,0.00010100774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010018209,0.00015869741,0.00025645358,0.00001944166,0.00020797522,0.000049688664,0.00018856047,0.000051196475,0.016921774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006491448,0.00010308287,0.00023087574,0.000045953326,0.00029717962,0.00006818374,0.00016962153,0.00015084016,0.00043785077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056256835,0.00037342028,0.00042014042,0.00008022664,0.000193698,0.00005214156,0.005372263,0.0000029437156,0.00086868176,0.96315265,0.028268116,0.0011594743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005543671,0.000078956095,0.0007501135,0.00004240382,0.0000831475,0.000014901173,0.0005931355,0.00003350862,0.0034365845,0.032432403,0.9617811,0.00019940165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064321226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026401636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000257027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034285145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213755443","doi":"10.33137/aestimatio.v2i1.37734","title":"Anonymus Cantabrigiensis: Commentarium in Sophisticos Elenchos Aristotelis edited by Sten Ebbesen","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aestimatio Sources and Studies in the History of Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Value (mathematics); Attribution; Field (mathematics); Library science; Classics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09221008824619414,"score_gpt":0.2903469466743142,"score_spread":0.19813685842812007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213755443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8579461,0.06398273,0.000021440525,0.01774756,0.005168243,0.00043966045,0.00013889706,0.000039198723,0.054516166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961187,0.0004997916,0.00009200379,0.0018886817,0.0001301768,0.000016579683,0.0000061688993,0.00000518874,0.0012427063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985896,0.00009445614,0.00034856616,0.0002743216,0.00039911646,0.00029396953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917823,0.00032776923,0.000097785356,0.00019762784,0.00014123849,0.0000573257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054251315,0.00013678291,0.00028791616,0.00010499302,0.0003200509,0.00003664845,0.0003009929,0.000023660683,0.00007833089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028625398,0.00009576448,0.00003800451,0.00014894949,0.0058525,0.0002192658,0.00013792037,0.00017668685,0.0000034454952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056580553,0.0008424566,0.0033379493,0.00036418578,0.00006850188,0.00008985007,0.5605962,0.00005017276,0.00031600136,0.35249332,0.07916039,0.002624362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009641663,0.0002334482,0.002360308,0.00036412207,0.00007648022,0.000028867527,0.070051506,0.0015118988,0.0000875878,0.033291318,0.8905371,0.0004932397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011393294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049451785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8113767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002823143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008641445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217799907","doi":"10.7202/1090450ar","title":"La fronde et la crosse. Aspects cynégétiques du débat entre « textualisme » et « contextualisme » en histoire des idées","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cygne noir","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022530726234770784,"score_gpt":0.2760009829114143,"score_spread":0.2534702566766435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217799907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16553448,0.038427744,0.00007953793,0.10179204,0.0039580273,0.00065950287,0.005154066,0.00051157083,0.6838831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915244,0.0014902607,0.00010462258,0.012355934,0.0025108375,0.0001279564,0.00038006937,0.00013637406,0.06764994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378186,0.0029584258,0.000754971,0.00077117333,0.0007198884,0.001013685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962417,0.0023716239,0.00023075842,0.00050981663,0.00017147222,0.0004746624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011222896,0.00070135784,0.00077027665,0.00016000465,0.0020078772,0.00069592684,0.0007002469,0.000309293,0.019817065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038419047,0.0006797738,0.00053483096,0.00013998394,0.003044741,0.0005673556,0.00077067275,0.00163295,0.00035641348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013790753,0.0013093299,0.00016129082,0.00023798701,0.00018695525,0.00057196146,0.051848263,0.000024983361,0.00007632518,0.9036745,0.03624311,0.0055273874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009558637,0.00034461432,0.000560719,0.0001705234,0.00013089587,0.00017574827,0.0053924182,0.000045711477,0.00006074662,0.28291014,0.70865613,0.0005964664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025395714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000767748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74970955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004928237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024306316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32877705","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2020.110147","title":"La philosophie internationale et les Colloques Castelli","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Niskamoon Corporation","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06835652631512563,"score_gpt":0.26530577364776997,"score_spread":0.19694924733264435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32877705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122353084,0.00017814097,0.000053374642,0.002005863,0.00026435638,0.000099181,0.0001220392,0.00011237285,0.8748116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99162066,0.00019081954,0.00019772872,0.0008592872,0.00067832234,0.000005587661,0.000036579433,0.000025349276,0.0063856384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988435,0.00031521692,0.00014757719,0.00022352862,0.000200969,0.0002692142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991257,0.00040546624,0.00006559106,0.0001656275,0.00007071101,0.00016689635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023072245,0.00017414821,0.00018315231,0.00014056302,0.00020751308,0.0001018665,0.00028490133,0.0001390644,0.006846616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004877026,0.00016613104,0.00014774341,0.00005369983,0.00062511896,0.00027339222,0.0000948832,0.0003246446,0.00024947387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053827574,0.00019549494,0.0003966448,0.00001620468,0.000065954475,0.00012296319,0.010237263,7.9644e-7,0.000011927289,0.9858256,0.0018048761,0.0012684559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046664404,0.00007906528,0.0018762581,0.0000379965,0.00004259191,0.000018218205,0.0012321568,0.000029944184,0.000084221916,0.34569976,0.6502102,0.00022290574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007582083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020265681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8692676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005386316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040997165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99406123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33401710","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines9010027","title":"Santé du corps et santé de l’esprit : les apports de l'éthique de Spinoza à l'éthique médicale","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Biomedicines","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02405082708446381,"score_gpt":0.2948944385821235,"score_spread":0.2708436114976597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33401710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62960076,0.0111119235,0.00034452885,0.018814873,0.0075374814,0.0012591478,0.0008028586,0.00073864456,0.32978976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595181,0.0023976185,0.00023140991,0.009376989,0.014306757,0.00013923948,0.001958123,0.00013302513,0.0119387675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970339,0.00032160452,0.000703143,0.00055386074,0.00048576517,0.00090171344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803483,0.00045937195,0.0002976599,0.00036772955,0.00023849517,0.0006018847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009552944,0.00060305477,0.0007192773,0.0002750191,0.00038301692,0.00015799222,0.0004557496,0.0011508655,0.004995503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006012677,0.0004779983,0.00032734676,0.00009228887,0.00068415364,0.00010862793,0.00005675838,0.0016443222,0.00010340224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032835625,0.0009236031,0.0022161035,0.0016505364,0.0002954626,0.0006849276,0.016102813,3.6180504e-7,0.004681518,0.9051756,0.05279898,0.015141716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063956407,0.00025182683,0.008719437,0.0009467392,0.0002799558,0.00013603471,0.0027822722,0.000044498294,0.0011833627,0.11952612,0.8647329,0.0007572477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015242615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00121047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.811934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013308768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048925134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37298298","doi":"10.3390/ijms24119346","title":"A etica do individuo em Hobbes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dissertatio","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Michelson Prize and Grants","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028862895747653505,"score_gpt":0.25638887213311085,"score_spread":0.22752597638545735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37298298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69303066,0.0003634223,0.000005621697,0.0055424254,0.00030547933,0.0001226521,0.00003828474,0.00011322159,0.30047822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892726,0.000009418747,0.000107345106,0.0015392585,0.0011226223,0.000021381255,0.000039040206,0.000017190452,0.007871156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912757,0.00002740625,0.00020186044,0.00017925978,0.00018970695,0.00027420523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953574,0.000087728105,0.000032569933,0.00014994362,0.00005091704,0.00014308226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000050234652,0.00013350857,0.00013663153,0.000042577954,0.00019906304,0.00018263567,0.0001561317,0.000037734335,0.008640981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038065464,0.00010374881,0.00009617021,0.000031621646,0.00010212485,0.0001574298,0.000018109073,0.00012481841,0.0015189011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014969632,0.00014335735,0.00017535035,0.0000123127475,0.000024735758,0.0000025577424,0.020168625,0.0000011277908,0.000017330227,0.97241473,0.0014485308,0.0055763465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037918147,0.000079010075,0.0035285107,0.000037491547,0.00004260404,0.000001853114,0.0048921057,0.000049565795,0.00049632415,0.11386514,0.87631905,0.0003091526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019115509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018228672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87487054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012170855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011038758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200227710","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000895","title":"The Role of Women in Hobbes's Economic Thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Relation (database); Creatures; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Politics; Historical materialism; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Economics; Law; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018693607633460355,"score_gpt":0.2327785102121307,"score_spread":0.21408490257867036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200227710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88117,0.0007218418,9.4587847e-7,0.008431054,0.0008951437,0.000036921174,0.000043622982,0.0000019729207,0.108698495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835646,0.000009848988,0.000014311819,0.0004862184,0.00064187276,0.000001037391,2.6712314e-7,0.0000044842286,0.00048548225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979657,0.00006635491,0.00039580453,0.000113192895,0.00020358636,0.0012553809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976096,0.00024567812,0.00007035314,0.0001452762,0.00018031827,0.0017487867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009604223,0.0000763596,0.00019157447,0.000117276926,0.00027507602,0.00017623788,0.0004620778,0.000026065369,0.0010797698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000664591,0.000050736493,0.00008430917,0.0000996125,0.002066077,0.0002053938,0.000029739476,0.0002074785,0.000027262331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036122788,0.00001318653,0.00090674456,0.000002632474,0.000005008044,0.00002935145,0.0010462374,0.0000016914029,0.000037025668,0.9972973,0.000049402937,0.00060784887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016706757,0.00007820905,0.009496693,0.00003649965,0.0000060117945,0.00004812889,0.0049327137,0.000039493945,0.0013971798,0.66438293,0.31931612,0.00009897301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00791247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029666381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33291432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086964184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030737577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200453423","doi":"10.1017/9781108906999.004","title":"The Transcendental Spinozism of the<i>Wissenschaftslehre</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Existentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Intelligibility (philosophy); Trope (literature); Transcendental number; Realism","score_opus":0.035986356484604284,"score_gpt":0.1911893291665237,"score_spread":0.1552029726819194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200453423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027047558,0.00050211936,0.0000025031718,0.0005259553,0.0012175903,0.00028431372,0.00072669575,0.000039846942,0.9964305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022900023,0.00026317674,0.000002192186,0.00026132286,0.0007064162,5.136708e-7,0.000024799176,0.000034533154,0.975807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986446,0.00007161574,0.00026647636,0.00031975773,0.00039342485,0.00030412807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987756,0.00014244896,0.00018268276,0.00059994246,0.00016967852,0.00012962689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007078449,0.00031575415,0.00035427423,0.00003295842,0.00064467866,0.00007647081,0.00070078514,0.00018364651,0.00012713773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008632493,0.00021646352,0.00067515846,0.000004151986,0.0014556928,0.00004367542,0.00028569406,0.0005980898,0.000012939697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004816061,0.000018992921,3.9150373e-7,0.00006558973,0.00018259416,0.00005058905,0.00020920447,1.1742464e-7,0.000015453716,0.98980504,0.009236381,0.00036747145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032030806,0.000029481487,0.0000046344367,0.00017532904,0.0002496897,0.00001008543,0.00016226564,0.0000033100657,0.00038918707,0.0009158695,0.99748564,0.00025422344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012221621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023843519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98888916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006469083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007139995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8827126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205699477","doi":"10.4000/books.psorbonne.89990","title":"La générosité comme liberté dans l’Éthique de Spinoza","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.045826512930416695,"score_gpt":0.256983554919073,"score_spread":0.21115704198865629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205699477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008553714,0.00050504,0.0003601564,0.013862541,0.00062003784,0.00048537608,0.0028643678,0.00034503028,0.98010206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7653914,0.000408221,0.0006458878,0.016330324,0.007874756,0.00016994445,0.00057222316,0.00031945063,0.20828778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962357,0.00078869844,0.0008541523,0.00073331373,0.00040847642,0.0009796108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961677,0.0018454014,0.00025438034,0.0006371291,0.0001271294,0.0009682286],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043372207,0.0009034172,0.00085513317,0.0001670239,0.0015042595,0.000524806,0.00064591895,0.00135624,0.005318332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012827535,0.00093744625,0.0009117957,0.00002358561,0.004262217,0.000113843445,0.00030419277,0.0031597083,0.0010187833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053033058,0.0002504221,0.000018160723,0.00029570644,0.00033873797,0.00065498153,0.0031147464,0.000004565916,0.00007475905,0.9903099,0.004012973,0.00087199226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039372843,0.00015139718,0.00006930107,0.00050172565,0.00031925022,0.00020921009,0.00015716211,0.000060860002,0.00008709275,0.51867646,0.47880524,0.0005685772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033530314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010666735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7718143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038111274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022450802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210906703","doi":"10.1177/1468796802002002664","title":"Review Symposium","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.11345935310389148,"score_gpt":0.2638607718730263,"score_spread":0.15040141876913482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210906703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043730557,0.09327975,0.0000021714186,0.038066514,0.0008458824,0.00014325274,0.00004405315,0.00016189662,0.8670192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47378486,0.10377916,0.000040392853,0.09935272,0.0066284575,0.00008620495,0.000035994723,0.00006768484,0.31622452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910384,0.00006355241,0.00022963152,0.00015746079,0.00016764067,0.0002778432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999509,0.00009769805,0.00003614345,0.00020477257,0.0000530435,0.000099390694],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008265442,0.00013684989,0.00020702835,0.000028683802,0.00017254877,0.0000510685,0.00016068592,0.000030727966,0.041985873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003643427,0.00010262095,0.00013553124,0.00002810025,0.00032241328,0.00012811566,0.000040545503,0.00016762559,0.0024185446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001438719,0.000049748687,0.0000017355653,0.00033152525,0.00001503397,0.0000038027006,0.0022903394,1.07166684e-7,0.000004314728,0.7902023,0.20614897,0.00095066195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008621639,0.000045898858,0.0000029433052,0.0005259288,0.000029616771,0.0000039010188,0.00014702913,0.000015642441,0.000023598526,0.025358513,0.9736063,0.00015444875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034115295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010022741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015046106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028298211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211133987","doi":"10.1017/9781108906999","title":"Hegel and the Challenge of Spinoza","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Metaphysics; German idealism; Monism; Philosophy; Idealism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.041318275807784,"score_gpt":0.19890978410814347,"score_spread":0.15759150830035948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211133987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005923173,0.0022431372,0.0000027729714,0.00055329,0.00034300098,0.000258493,0.0004672238,0.000032871896,0.99604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007554996,0.0005972708,0.0000037037416,0.0001804006,0.00082399877,8.6238e-7,0.000053105534,0.000021434544,0.9907642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989319,0.00012509529,0.00019870525,0.0003043804,0.00022232313,0.00021763846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899393,0.00021992259,0.0001451682,0.00037795093,0.00014653246,0.00011649314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009710201,0.00024507733,0.00049898983,0.00005240573,0.00022430641,0.000049899354,0.00031922784,0.00015799612,0.00005671181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016192564,0.00018619269,0.00027097034,0.000003495083,0.001808641,0.000043650576,0.00037466112,0.00042592426,0.0000050275294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101888574,0.000023787195,6.1333076e-8,0.00023977387,0.00016854878,0.00005388591,0.0006916391,5.17578e-8,3.3367425e-7,0.97444904,0.02405953,0.00021144791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001011605,0.00004097664,8.963094e-7,0.00021128761,0.0002630362,0.000003464983,0.0001575278,0.000008131305,0.00001566377,0.0034005633,0.9946791,0.0002077443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013377267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000452234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045019246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008467139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75927174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211165779","doi":"10.1017/9781108778879.001","title":"Introduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Social contract; Natural (archaeology); Politics; State (computer science); Natural law; State of nature; Sociology; Law; History; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.045650212236697005,"score_gpt":0.19131806898602613,"score_spread":0.14566785674932914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211165779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000057306697,0.00009836546,0.000016088909,0.0017531931,0.0011052086,0.00021255095,0.0005613375,0.00019752087,0.99605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011549521,0.000047097674,0.0000094933475,0.00050507055,0.008974516,3.809006e-7,0.00015587296,0.000042701846,0.98910993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988822,0.000027801574,0.00017325176,0.00045998217,0.00022981822,0.00022699781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991966,0.000037665264,0.00010968795,0.00030415508,0.00011182476,0.00024004912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000031429456,0.00031120642,0.00034239097,0.00007287404,0.0002486992,0.00007768844,0.00029840902,0.00017703554,0.00041562505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009301986,0.00032614655,0.00026822876,0.0000021172311,0.00047557155,0.0000809872,0.00020366482,0.00053638587,0.00033563614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058426554,0.000008101043,2.1427795e-8,0.000052878742,0.00009253438,0.00007197909,0.000106329826,1.0082832e-7,0.0000021273859,0.77791125,0.22140326,0.00029302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023621217,0.000067500245,2.2645833e-7,0.000040909563,0.00019755948,0.000004234708,0.000033537293,0.000007135663,0.0000322859,0.001227868,0.997796,0.00035650257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041201027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012579069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77668333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092365335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030167294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213209159","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197577264.001.0001","title":"Recasting Hume and Early Modern Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07787960757916802,"score_gpt":0.23448879858188373,"score_spread":0.1566091910027157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213209159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016086262,0.0033012622,0.000009922358,0.0021604714,0.0006913137,0.00016169334,0.00012445096,0.00013121599,0.99325883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013874469,0.00014793454,0.00006492266,0.0016885016,0.008300487,0.000010299541,0.00011031103,0.000075033866,0.97572803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983332,0.000045116132,0.0004035515,0.0005195986,0.00031799724,0.00038049588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990588,0.00018715573,0.00010016917,0.0002897862,0.00012461423,0.00023947998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008186369,0.00039187056,0.0005303232,0.00008379113,0.00027887448,0.0003187491,0.00016569342,0.00023234915,0.0069618146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003316379,0.000322008,0.00022505653,0.000012761431,0.00041020682,0.00012866988,0.00020070844,0.00058836327,0.00021843042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008275746,0.000034993696,0.000002711407,0.00016057045,0.00008787149,0.000046496803,0.0012459322,7.782289e-8,8.53404e-7,0.9854182,0.010870389,0.0021236367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010425121,0.00004262283,0.0000016566748,0.00020235172,0.000047252823,0.0000055302035,0.000011882886,0.000011829476,0.0000014402988,0.49581414,0.5035115,0.0002455444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028398326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017530945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49264112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045459128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071695686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214834851","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139137034","title":"Hobbes and the Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Scholarship; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03812495127859025,"score_gpt":0.19070429638764935,"score_spread":0.1525793451090591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214834851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027515416,0.0011424276,0.0000028712282,0.00033749625,0.00056102197,0.00031062105,0.00044314883,0.00008018379,0.9970947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006079682,0.000111356785,0.0000029901964,0.0009242317,0.0021414373,0.0000012580803,0.000050116792,0.000027420101,0.9906615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989505,0.00012256576,0.0001423991,0.00025390292,0.00020058987,0.00033007492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905664,0.00026510836,0.000093296,0.00032134695,0.0000712968,0.00019232763],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114229384,0.0002804236,0.0003657825,0.000037696238,0.00053881435,0.00012494264,0.00034256667,0.0001628707,0.000052678653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000066400785,0.00019871717,0.00021059086,0.000002140691,0.002833699,0.000094869756,0.0003328745,0.0004770062,0.000041240877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010160434,0.000012408521,1.0414166e-7,0.000070591785,0.00011197616,0.00001581595,0.00062428066,1.2303579e-8,1.1580107e-7,0.9084483,0.09050034,0.00011446229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008246907,0.000018957868,7.754862e-7,0.00006803434,0.00033409396,0.0000057379234,0.00009872288,0.0000030181563,0.0000052247988,0.0023728434,0.99600506,0.00026284676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003309625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008774899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9060754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060513947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033166245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220688983","doi":"10.1163/18750257-bja10037","title":"Hobbes Reenvisions Hebraic and Christian History","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hobbes Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Intellectual history; Eschatology; Sovereignty; Politics; History of religions; Monarchy; Predestination; Theology; New Testament; Old Testament; Literature; History; Law; Art","score_opus":0.14732684142912775,"score_gpt":0.269738447787569,"score_spread":0.12241160635844126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220688983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37192395,0.34252328,0.0000047092217,0.04707329,0.008097945,0.00073489407,0.0005205587,0.0009970596,0.22812432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835268,0.0011292545,0.000024072635,0.0028443686,0.0009569845,0.00008741256,0.000013075606,0.000029908855,0.01138811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988194,0.000108245615,0.00022346342,0.00028416858,0.00025896868,0.00030572677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993832,0.00022971474,0.000050776875,0.00018274925,0.000049076254,0.00010449344],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013874446,0.00017722117,0.00028248483,0.00007659091,0.0008913798,0.000027811651,0.00014186122,0.000017518518,0.002753619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008314404,0.00014459655,0.00009651276,0.000029120978,0.0007599672,0.00008564926,0.00043427607,0.00024018009,0.000043499975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022530035,0.00012752872,0.00013417318,0.00004711115,0.00012928544,0.000019497778,0.019713575,0.0000011085264,0.000008570894,0.8482286,0.13088581,0.0006822442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021973034,0.00018769958,0.00030636138,0.000015137339,0.000046735975,0.0000069619864,0.011742993,0.000008942433,0.0000030490696,0.0485688,0.93870103,0.00019256826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013968008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007656007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8078152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001381457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017967432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225396521","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.25.1.0098","title":"Democracy as Fetish, by Ralph Cintron, University Park: Penn State University Press","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Hegemony; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Liberal democracy; End of history; Hegelianism; Law; Media studies; Political economy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03523233007786373,"score_gpt":0.210550944554872,"score_spread":0.17531861447700828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225396521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14759913,0.051046673,0.0015777049,0.07230489,0.14785402,0.0033029437,0.005778211,0.00043180623,0.57010466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31706005,0.0006597067,0.000018247874,0.00035644186,0.00060505635,9.839658e-7,0.000013529973,0.00001980071,0.6812662],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998858,0.00021127224,0.00019204081,0.00014624571,0.0003224835,0.00026997903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905264,0.0002708475,0.00024371635,0.00016180704,0.00011995608,0.00015102974],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031002352,0.00012448721,0.00020596116,0.000065713684,0.0016289369,0.00001769122,0.0005116527,0.000022362861,0.0026665595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025621985,0.00010420668,0.00026948904,0.000035847068,0.0002832715,0.00019079703,0.00012630956,0.00041621143,0.000008939745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054823764,0.00017740148,0.000011360758,0.000021091526,0.00011705287,0.000021338341,0.0028917848,0.000036120033,0.00002231178,0.2660478,0.72959715,0.0005083221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007298876,0.00026563075,0.000016917025,0.0000063229,0.00011971071,0.000023651179,0.0016468241,0.00005063075,0.000003977865,0.010783245,0.98622024,0.00013299083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019223492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000821263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25662306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012532453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012656541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225697747","doi":"10.34699/rido.2022.7","title":"Repenser le rapport salarial comme captation de puissance grâce à Spinoza","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.058119260080146944,"score_gpt":0.2530459841281967,"score_spread":0.19492672404804973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225697747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06862089,0.0040987986,0.012310499,0.20133656,0.0027946273,0.0013085185,0.0010291279,0.00046876527,0.7080322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.834838,0.0010763094,0.0058927624,0.0017273398,0.0007532218,0.00026814622,0.0024337417,0.00013829768,0.15287223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866878,0.009231144,0.0011718137,0.0011812436,0.00078616274,0.0009418304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931509,0.0018885481,0.00077383796,0.0021598807,0.0014938621,0.0005330099],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061988123,0.00063891476,0.00073041767,0.00016929576,0.0021693727,0.000788773,0.0015862706,0.00040553667,0.006519712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013040841,0.0007277352,0.0006084337,0.00022308923,0.001176058,0.00029220208,0.0016380342,0.0017692321,0.00021344417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005922004,0.0013432562,0.00043240402,0.00021171285,0.00014606222,0.000027436981,0.01517882,0.000074272255,0.00017852912,0.97353315,0.0048886286,0.0039265025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010381121,0.0000026267267,0.0024150147,0.0009805753,0.00014185223,0.000028930168,0.00082962017,0.0034330117,0.0021056193,0.16480774,0.8233702,0.0008466654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012013968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001293402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8184816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035713636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079443026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230886526","doi":"10.1177/1474885117718371","title":"Contra politanism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Teleology; Personhood; Sovereignty; Politics; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); State of nature; Sociology; Social contract; Moral agency; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06216706977571082,"score_gpt":0.27363641230366903,"score_spread":0.2114693425279582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230886526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023946233,0.00022743145,0.00025700184,0.009658571,0.0019574112,0.00005608984,0.000052615705,0.000027423906,0.96381724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98344773,0.000009951333,0.00007870331,0.0030485685,0.0082877735,2.9038884e-7,0.0000010796091,0.000036943402,0.0050889677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975727,0.00074973726,0.00060147844,0.00013931375,0.0003196622,0.0006170978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980012,0.00036409803,0.00030976158,0.00043748133,0.00021666665,0.00067079277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015060055,0.00018702506,0.0003325147,0.00006760525,0.0006061952,0.00042208817,0.0008476003,0.000025076914,0.0032130503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010991414,0.00013039898,0.00034809113,0.0000070274964,0.0014501822,0.00032240088,0.000133967,0.00045407648,0.0006217066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008992428,0.00012002181,0.000021249192,0.000011497497,0.00007465146,0.00034326097,0.00055616605,5.3748202e-8,0.000027427304,0.9961816,0.0009848286,0.0015893367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006686595,0.0002656047,0.0014915381,0.00007190612,0.000059823677,0.000085575535,0.00041667948,0.000001197135,0.00010026474,0.7084076,0.2882786,0.00015255358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008874386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.38952e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039921597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003381014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231391498","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0340","title":"Baruch Spinoza","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Toleration; Secularization; Politics; Subject (documents); Natural philosophy; Political philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Law; History; Theology","score_opus":0.04653058455976685,"score_gpt":0.2564367321713969,"score_spread":0.20990614761163004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231391498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025032568,0.00869665,0.000014260969,0.002812065,0.001800346,0.0001996946,0.0005302414,0.00009536089,0.98560107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27293983,0.25186872,0.000034132863,0.001747789,0.022131478,0.00008611485,0.0012881309,0.000093053866,0.44981074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868596,0.000036951373,0.00039592024,0.0002516332,0.00028584883,0.00034367316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992955,0.00006946884,0.00017697825,0.00022336488,0.00008891886,0.0001457982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000894255,0.00028068514,0.00034648727,0.00010052408,0.00030957954,0.00013512437,0.00014543603,0.00023909683,0.0014913867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037780013,0.00015397121,0.00011625269,0.000024721696,0.00028567438,0.00037609652,0.00006429254,0.00031117344,0.00059260865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002140679,0.00006576855,0.000013456582,0.0010958206,0.000053195454,0.0000036670626,0.0011099197,1.9743766e-8,7.5608483e-7,0.5291708,0.3548002,0.11366496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024759254,0.000073564865,0.00003692427,0.0012173286,0.000034866316,0.000006147653,0.00005379071,0.0000051806874,0.000016845268,0.036742393,0.961291,0.0002743354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022609322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000099384015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60649085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058365295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003272393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232665384","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_191-1","title":"Human Dignity in Renaissance Philosophy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; The Renaissance; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Art history; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10549832685543652,"score_gpt":0.2703037720847151,"score_spread":0.1648054452292786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232665384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001087427,0.00032801373,7.405617e-7,0.0017389171,0.0006418655,0.00024792712,0.0001654017,0.00013241437,0.996636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11071798,0.000034873676,0.000011848231,0.0019070067,0.00826094,0.000010941643,0.00009564024,0.000072764844,0.878888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819124,0.000024512567,0.000536213,0.00051264494,0.00033262212,0.0004027824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990796,0.00005750316,0.00012422664,0.00045139634,0.000102983824,0.00018430856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011490758,0.00045031283,0.00052777474,0.00016111946,0.00023609321,0.00010333377,0.00034487693,0.00026958453,0.10997196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013795193,0.00036344014,0.00025979223,0.0000102393,0.0010439154,0.000120514786,0.00013949489,0.0006045481,0.0037475568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011275188,0.0000643245,0.0000023882474,0.000060381804,0.000033206943,0.000023063787,0.00040772848,2.1177275e-8,7.2084646e-7,0.97231084,0.026979739,0.000106292675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013444728,0.000072629475,0.000003833391,0.00016593539,0.000014322904,7.689759e-7,0.0000053622052,4.0618423e-7,0.000003276183,0.50573915,0.49360475,0.00025514115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006614869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036606262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.466625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006561061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018833329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232823581","doi":"10.2990/28_2_84","title":"Impassioned politics: New research on the role of emotions in political life - Marlene Sokolon, Political Emotions: Aristotle and the Symphony of Reason and Emotion (New York: Northern Illinois University Press, 2006), 217 pages. ISBN 978-0875803616. Hardcover, $38.00. - Rebecca Kingston and Leonard Ferry, ed., Bringing the Passions Back In (Vancouver Canada: University of British Colombia Press, 2008), 268 pages. ISBN 978-0774814102. Paperback, $34.95. - Drew Westen, The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation, (New York: Public Affairs, 2008), 475 pages. ISBN 978-1586485733. Paperback, $15.95.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics and the Life Sciences","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Symphony; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Art history; Art; Law","score_opus":0.045355460910702486,"score_gpt":0.22819395747414462,"score_spread":0.18283849656344214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232823581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4011564,0.03171012,0.000025126656,0.5394699,0.00050757156,0.002708468,0.001188321,0.000033826742,0.023200264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913553,0.0061284597,0.000018563622,0.0011646494,0.00031964554,0.0000045072584,0.000010392613,0.000022780514,0.00097571797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932982,0.0026211939,0.0009101542,0.00060099846,0.0012311175,0.0013383573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241996,0.0054625035,0.00047095894,0.0007431419,0.00038982267,0.000513611],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030946939,0.0003927018,0.00073227304,0.000114420174,0.0017544923,0.00023086926,0.0012462754,0.00021796455,0.00010200694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021432152,0.00020236487,0.00022156286,0.0005904342,0.008051406,0.00034293527,0.0006255326,0.0010294575,9.720102e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013635917,0.00022856341,0.0031960108,0.000055641383,0.000076188524,0.0000020816658,0.0026714953,0.000044881617,0.000019841347,0.9706257,0.022517398,0.00042585065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005597322,0.00045382563,0.16717164,0.0018959828,0.00037485216,0.00005338706,0.12651367,0.0053370465,0.00022597656,0.53157413,0.1600631,0.00073907635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35594463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1441833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5901989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002663045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015950565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234369043","doi":"10.3138/9781442619890-fm","title":"Frontmatter","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ECW Press (Canada); Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04959589808041068,"score_gpt":0.20809872382097921,"score_spread":0.15850282574056854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234369043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008898357,0.0007666166,0.00000750888,0.000069311456,0.00050379935,0.00015877062,0.00040529043,0.00005741778,0.9980224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045321565,0.000044070555,0.00005183799,0.0001807816,0.0012029267,1.251173e-7,0.00003056808,0.000027301754,0.99800915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911344,0.00001825809,0.00016338035,0.00027143606,0.0002281348,0.00020537934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992073,0.00003966566,0.00014581066,0.00033746086,0.00013803951,0.00013167749],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000037443704,0.00024214029,0.0003582262,0.000013822268,0.00015823863,0.000026093767,0.00037431633,0.00018625986,0.12762184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000021158064,0.00024538898,0.00027221924,9.217361e-8,0.0008280648,0.000089377085,0.00019830506,0.00015471666,0.0005465509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060961873,0.000015347014,1.0263959e-7,0.000055714685,0.00014321734,0.0000119447905,0.00666045,1.847608e-8,9.618728e-7,0.8391067,0.15321194,0.0007326472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002536818,0.00009956517,8.427914e-7,0.00013452639,0.00015697934,7.501699e-7,0.00005032364,0.0000021914805,0.000010450073,0.03211521,0.96691793,0.00025751803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016044362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008150516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81370604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008857234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001947775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235013541","doi":"10.1080/03085140303133","title":"Diverse enlightenments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economy and Society","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Metaphysics; Transcendental number; Philosophy; German; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03712897624515784,"score_gpt":0.21769234518611744,"score_spread":0.1805633689409596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235013541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095731445,0.00027300854,0.000012611275,0.00093974744,0.00039828155,0.00008025122,0.000022190547,0.000034227334,0.90250826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878469,0.000081551865,0.00007964999,0.003265953,0.0003922451,0.0000060791676,0.000004851293,0.000005266481,0.00831747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995551,0.000019902389,0.00009659343,0.00013184025,0.000033497126,0.00016305444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997693,0.000034708683,0.000018612254,0.000069705246,0.000012314015,0.000095363124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007010544,0.00007855659,0.00009373677,0.0000051070233,0.00027083472,0.0000673084,0.00003936558,0.00003176135,0.004038474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050312087,0.00006388609,0.00010190554,0.000006699502,0.00018229258,0.00012342086,0.000018773138,0.000076786964,0.00013532749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010102109,0.000036353522,0.00020819281,0.000008327564,0.000030750816,5.6011635e-7,0.0043837987,5.1597702e-8,6.0841097e-7,0.98970586,0.005344796,0.00027970667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020839092,0.00001670073,0.00006185837,0.0000029392668,0.000009882425,8.6642325e-7,0.0023039444,0.000007997824,0.000029176761,0.14059457,0.8566778,0.0000858741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007583294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017262114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012676318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006362042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237979863","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340075","title":"Recollecting Athens","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polis The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Contextualism; Relation (database); Politics; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Focus (optics); Sociology; Ancient Greek; Philosophy; History; Classics; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06341342900210875,"score_gpt":0.28297159990533294,"score_spread":0.2195581709032242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237979863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5348127,0.0029179675,0.0025446725,0.21599986,0.010968986,0.0014881288,0.0009693067,0.00030650027,0.22999187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96609867,0.00013794974,0.00011539217,0.00509392,0.007915117,0.000016857364,0.0000024613084,0.00004099427,0.020578666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974907,0.00018767182,0.0005073661,0.00024208709,0.00034053318,0.0012316165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974285,0.0013355142,0.00011847865,0.00023270819,0.00018652885,0.00069828855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008057434,0.00026425012,0.00030587998,0.00009938035,0.0019018854,0.0002191929,0.00032243427,0.00007653322,0.0006180614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046261048,0.00011742495,0.00027846548,0.00006495245,0.00063728826,0.00024785992,0.00011173321,0.00027933836,0.000068055684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008060023,0.00008133193,0.000083996325,0.000019596022,0.000050303814,0.000005855991,0.0014029912,7.1105276e-8,0.00012397149,0.9863565,0.010294766,0.0015000035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061687105,0.00022987521,0.00020224656,0.000076716846,0.00008123117,0.00026033123,0.00040553106,0.00002208975,0.00013768878,0.36064884,0.6371239,0.00019470419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003826001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036316076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6268291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098733355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004737487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239793115","doi":"10.3138/cras.38.1.147","title":"Leo Strauss and Resourceful Odysseus: Rhetorical Violence and the Holy Middle","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Liberalism; Politics; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Literature; Political philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); History; Epistemology; Law; Art; Theology; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10087696311942382,"score_gpt":0.2835550663769433,"score_spread":0.18267810325751946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239793115","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1791945,0.7777625,5.745648e-7,0.02346196,0.00017098922,0.00039657613,0.0001205736,0.000019418885,0.018872967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59541816,0.39744312,0.000016418488,0.0065333024,0.0002511626,0.000018139759,0.000002006648,0.000007856348,0.0003098088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890524,0.00012816295,0.00030998987,0.00020704212,0.00015688576,0.000292706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990028,0.00031870778,0.00010748711,0.0001871137,0.00011408892,0.0002697809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018813515,0.00016496696,0.0006166773,0.00004298934,0.0004126363,0.000015488162,0.00013337874,0.000014126064,0.00008223924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026182656,0.00009586389,0.00008930348,0.000083079445,0.005496729,0.0000428445,0.000055745157,0.00014121801,0.000009104055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051594125,0.000049005233,0.0010728502,0.003246958,0.00044069652,0.000073210475,0.012989186,9.106862e-8,0.0000013021821,0.92298913,0.01495867,0.04412732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004433563,0.00020435541,0.0025412731,0.0055825566,0.00017270277,0.000058658374,0.005298069,0.0000020981024,0.000002386875,0.0075647407,0.9778292,0.00030060954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012078705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002691335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96287054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032426553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052857737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240929778","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom110116","title":"Authority","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.031864344527523986,"score_gpt":0.2486904842154223,"score_spread":0.21682613968789832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240929778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000029979292,0.0020833598,0.000006769984,0.00037280584,0.0026108052,0.00041280087,0.00047308402,0.00019994637,0.9938374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021690171,0.003243379,0.00021197068,0.00023507043,0.0037370492,0.00003458007,0.00019420851,0.00021488748,0.99191195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998427,0.000059678838,0.0003488152,0.00033513413,0.00050169753,0.00032768934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991182,0.000023342485,0.00017929832,0.0004469237,0.000047745274,0.00018447454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015571364,0.00030804152,0.00043451632,0.00019842833,0.000042434443,0.000028007184,0.00037303776,0.00012696284,0.028299993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016213025,0.00025575867,0.00014086987,0.000048198526,0.00026970636,0.000038291608,0.00021136145,0.00018939386,0.0011852809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005602657,0.000110992885,0.000002138745,0.000239279,0.00010533952,0.000011495534,0.00022932059,7.985633e-8,6.716109e-9,0.41429195,0.5823506,0.002653184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002624585,0.000053756397,0.0000048983643,0.00031962644,0.000154252,3.175385e-7,0.00012758213,0.000001283419,1.6968494e-7,0.036798935,0.9619981,0.00027860986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020153288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011739649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3796475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032284945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019349045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241424073","doi":"10.1002/9781444397161.ch7","title":"Conceiving","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Classics; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0812120374447119,"score_gpt":0.23344664750928365,"score_spread":0.15223461006457176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241424073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.606509e-7,0.00057367247,0.0000052250816,0.00025213798,0.0012997994,0.00009053496,0.00007294565,0.00034931267,0.99735564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025333073,0.00005312807,0.000031207946,0.0012191636,0.004989168,0.000006877928,0.000021655122,0.00022860445,0.9909169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938273,0.000018670176,0.00011464104,0.00017221681,0.000100417405,0.00021131245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996542,0.000021620817,0.00004359593,0.00017510851,0.000011490556,0.000093987735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000021520249,0.00016766835,0.00019624297,0.000056591074,0.00004293089,0.000040139617,0.00014777518,0.00009868176,0.63716596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073142787,0.00011691221,0.00009881968,0.000007282524,0.00023267131,0.000019046014,0.00003866576,0.00013485197,0.008746362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.252425e-7,0.000016407688,5.716049e-7,0.000014184641,0.000019517764,0.0000018837119,0.00016897106,2.4563887e-10,3.7172686e-8,0.52884036,0.47072065,0.00021682974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006552218,0.000016860899,4.482708e-7,0.00007123013,0.000019175111,5.4031807e-7,0.000034099197,6.220411e-7,0.0000020617103,0.039783627,0.9598277,0.00017809912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006129779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002625756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6284196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005925006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007651715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99202543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242096098","doi":"10.4000/rsa.827","title":"Joas Hans, Knöbl Wolfgang, War in Social Thought. Hobbes to the Present","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.25258817251484916,"score_gpt":0.42428065515327545,"score_spread":0.1716924826384263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242096098","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08622681,0.12958042,0.0004173431,0.64568496,0.0057714917,0.0017102524,0.0006309466,0.0006416451,0.12933613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858222,0.068775706,0.003491829,0.01196433,0.02677046,0.0004000946,0.00011990238,0.00014469425,0.030110955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853356,0.01013435,0.0010314552,0.00075848325,0.000445941,0.0022942016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476236,0.003780068,0.00025777012,0.00053961406,0.00021731223,0.00044289246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063347155,0.0008647116,0.0010561788,0.0001741973,0.0012596847,0.00022396083,0.0009844941,0.0018346559,0.00233849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015904114,0.0005901036,0.0006236422,0.0002466209,0.0062186164,0.0006783901,0.0006325715,0.0031813069,0.0006831957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010621694,0.0012006114,0.0032356456,0.00014432597,0.00016198443,0.000016328207,0.061266135,0.0000022907366,0.000015328433,0.85517144,0.07079213,0.0078875385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002631072,0.00068782346,0.00454207,0.00019484271,0.00009848775,0.000012092983,0.019707493,0.000014213866,0.0009891365,0.16363125,0.80909353,0.0007659592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007666152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014226707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77199525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001095673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024269937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248963546","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_35","title":"Joy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.15500353095470262,"score_gpt":0.27042006209212327,"score_spread":0.11541653113742065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248963546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012318408,0.00046788843,0.000009398523,0.0012775237,0.0011489127,0.0001145234,0.00010115717,0.0001412513,0.99673814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012946391,0.00007818586,0.000029685963,0.0043884865,0.006629106,0.0000016144485,0.00007091201,0.000051244457,0.98745614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888134,0.0000045440834,0.0002971715,0.00025065793,0.00027769155,0.0002885862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936426,0.00008734848,0.000056757868,0.00023788,0.00007388321,0.00017986182],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000072953786,0.00027841085,0.0002857754,0.00008663253,0.00012749835,0.000077914956,0.0001664412,0.00019534527,0.18024035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006636424,0.00020468092,0.0002620606,0.0000027231724,0.0003368009,0.00004577543,0.000061691055,0.0003856664,0.008071794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008055882,0.000016406218,1.136757e-7,0.000020538284,0.000046820016,0.000021251692,0.00014531815,1.01740225e-8,7.5315064e-8,0.9693758,0.02780375,0.0025618428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005068516,0.000025892736,1.8505239e-7,0.000029258112,0.000023490718,0.0000015816928,0.0000062688755,4.2743707e-7,0.0000015814326,0.443867,0.5558275,0.00016613456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021953956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007115398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028868948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014030318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249440594","doi":"10.7202/012966ar","title":"Jean-Louis Fournel, Jean Claude Zancarini, La politique de l’expérience. Savonarole, Guicciardini et le républicanisme florentin, Turin, Edizioni dell’Orso, 2002, 386 pages. Marie Gaille-Nikodimov, Conflit civil et liberté. La politique machiavélienne entre histoire et médecine, Paris, Honoré Champion, 2004. Machiavel, Discours sur la première décade de Tite-Live, nouvelle traduction d’Alessandro Fontana et Xavier Tabet, préface d’Alessandro Fontana, Paris, Gallimard, collection « Bibliothèque de Philosophie », 2004, 575 pages.","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Champion; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029425720666728383,"score_gpt":0.2604969081123447,"score_spread":0.23107118744561633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249440594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009433673,0.09292987,0.0028333028,0.5518426,0.0020816168,0.0030459175,0.0061187646,0.0011839287,0.33053032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8139311,0.1467884,0.0009013531,0.009817403,0.007978453,0.00069441635,0.002327099,0.00062339695,0.016938394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831732,0.0058913277,0.0028668668,0.0026958974,0.0016087826,0.0037639225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901322,0.0039102016,0.0014816608,0.0015052872,0.0009617852,0.002008875],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037745207,0.0026135426,0.0024941072,0.0016176909,0.0019583853,0.002314267,0.0014299089,0.0022877632,0.0028310737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009390723,0.0027255886,0.0014752623,0.0010963717,0.0030220738,0.0029573557,0.0006246187,0.0046559856,0.000081222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065690174,0.0041702273,0.004784569,0.00070838036,0.0005869077,0.00047308553,0.0028405697,0.00072176213,0.0001145906,0.73370177,0.25099033,0.00025091856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042141373,0.00057194737,0.0037384063,0.0013407258,0.000623001,0.0006291864,0.0007790749,0.00078024965,0.00044029555,0.32070193,0.66379416,0.0023868855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032874227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01652423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022314251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031553176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250827437","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-28760-3","title":"Reclaiming Liberalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Liberalism; Hubris; Independence (probability theory); Functional illiteracy; Epistemology; Power (physics); Political science; Philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22677638153472696,"score_gpt":0.33500505305278894,"score_spread":0.10822867151806198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250827437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046521982,0.0071232603,0.0000021362116,0.047544483,0.0053943177,0.00061519747,0.0004933844,0.0003121986,0.9384685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010520165,0.0019059588,0.00018742973,0.01864721,0.021886468,0.00018633556,0.00045424272,0.0002651766,0.945947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950959,0.00026978506,0.0013631076,0.0012714935,0.0008738783,0.0011258383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970328,0.0013328673,0.0003197069,0.0005993569,0.00022454957,0.00049068715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024886397,0.0010926753,0.0019403354,0.00024252605,0.0004894069,0.0002301065,0.0007365002,0.000565966,0.0017679628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037865518,0.0008935619,0.00076846546,0.00010262795,0.0025480061,0.00009325137,0.0007692531,0.0024253847,0.0011068876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005002211,0.000048677295,0.0000028052536,0.00033764716,0.00035277463,0.00028595226,0.010973304,4.528863e-7,4.138509e-7,0.7656581,0.22137648,0.0009134215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037341678,0.00009640623,0.0000037432858,0.0005457433,0.00010825247,0.000004338175,0.00016311408,0.000011729375,0.0000023266057,0.47863138,0.51949745,0.00056208915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022951215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011583401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29812098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048835424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014643917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251762122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.001","title":"EMPIRE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE REAL SPANISH CONTRIBUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; International law; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Law; Humanism; Natural law; Politics; Vocabulary; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04463799458015297,"score_gpt":0.21915463777847477,"score_spread":0.1745166431983218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251762122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029961457,0.00026419235,0.000025980695,0.0017577525,0.0005731939,0.000046668272,0.000055142962,0.000012597466,0.96730304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973726,0.00030406285,0.000043064283,0.00026070263,0.00046462737,2.5612838e-8,0.0000040498167,0.000002522542,0.0015482889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958587,0.000045140612,0.00008592124,0.000063452346,0.00011168586,0.0001079374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996413,0.000027788426,0.00006775189,0.000056678902,0.00012467812,0.00008182534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010123384,0.000055624976,0.00008280399,0.0000048530474,0.00054825784,0.00003754987,0.00017196657,0.000027641232,0.0061860927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049558753,0.000041120165,0.00006770886,0.0000023975501,0.00048210143,0.0003268784,0.0000548799,0.000102383645,0.0000073632937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080052334,0.00004826538,0.00013585135,0.0000017628072,0.000055004675,0.000008917589,0.005012818,4.391942e-8,0.0000040231716,0.993833,0.00041499894,0.00040525018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006656727,0.000122029836,0.0022177005,0.000024650004,0.00005966403,0.000026622103,0.004434611,0.000014457027,0.000021360145,0.11404986,0.87827265,0.00009073597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021178082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03743182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005542133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000068688564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99472237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253518044","doi":"10.1002/9781119009924.eopr0373","title":"Spinoza, Baruch","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Secularism; Epistemology; Divine providence; Religious studies; Theology; Islam","score_opus":0.0265501627936296,"score_gpt":0.24533161511097173,"score_spread":0.21878145231734214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253518044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000085590844,0.013176945,0.000002553809,0.0033058426,0.0015266683,0.0003059088,0.00029654606,0.00006612722,0.98123384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041715983,0.027555404,0.00012302786,0.0007865818,0.016102029,0.000032572294,0.00023914147,0.0004599425,0.9129853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816763,0.000104301755,0.00058889226,0.00033222418,0.0005153639,0.0002915618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983883,0.0002485946,0.0004603074,0.0006903896,0.000108206084,0.00010419343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012464776,0.0003653871,0.0006975303,0.00016053235,0.00007436702,0.000016512935,0.0005533304,0.00022539345,0.008280896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010681794,0.00024463492,0.00044163913,0.000083619896,0.0008390859,0.000031116622,0.00014495915,0.0003556115,0.00011464565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014095061,0.00017530746,0.000009842942,0.00047041726,0.00009581065,0.0000052806586,0.0004668485,1.7953691e-7,0.000007794585,0.7029815,0.29541278,0.0003601677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001908691,0.00011384895,0.0000049272503,0.0006954976,0.00010849945,0.0000019837626,0.000023328412,9.805831e-7,0.000048958696,0.24385546,0.7547501,0.00020553984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057198387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047822472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45933732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015041343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053819673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253811883","doi":"10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0421","title":"<scp>G</scp>rotius,<scp>H</scp>ugo (1583–1645)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02597654486666185,"score_gpt":0.2572676608061142,"score_spread":0.23129111593945234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253811883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016617206,0.0038397308,0.000008581234,0.00045039356,0.003315344,0.00088612776,0.0006899842,0.00046690577,0.9886812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039515095,0.0029547,0.000085645945,0.0010398704,0.021001173,0.00009491546,0.00017440827,0.0006961388,0.97000164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958972,0.00031530316,0.0008986358,0.0007806834,0.0009490367,0.0011591444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995581,0.0018479712,0.00065311167,0.0013206319,0.00017220055,0.00042508656],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003369205,0.00094866887,0.0011195479,0.00028578704,0.00036640986,0.0001541496,0.0015985034,0.00045010482,0.00950903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009582457,0.0006222575,0.00063330476,0.0001642086,0.0018126286,0.00015326349,0.00047127245,0.00074567745,0.007245844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035357868,0.00025273743,0.0000542107,0.00018499345,0.0002526842,0.000011539914,0.0029750876,1.2664702e-7,0.000001829461,0.33988124,0.65613073,0.00025126748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050900265,0.00019840879,0.00006626318,0.00034872786,0.00031146628,0.000006078067,0.00064619945,0.0000031754107,0.000031509036,0.09878579,0.8989227,0.00017071646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029660756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012588812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24279192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045848967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011418918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254376792","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.037","title":"DISTINCTIONS OF POWER AND THE POWER OF DISTINCTIONS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KOSKENNIEMI","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Rationalization (economics); Power (physics); Epistemology; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Pretext; Law; Empire; Sociology; Political science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029781548179835825,"score_gpt":0.22118174203996982,"score_spread":0.191400193860134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254376792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49712607,0.0007066838,0.00027248962,0.0042440053,0.00077397155,0.00032534567,0.00027276302,0.000017966435,0.4962607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752134,0.00003227475,0.00016903231,0.00006720267,0.000053310432,1.6140488e-7,6.372644e-7,0.000004116625,0.0021519095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928993,0.00017302307,0.00019121708,0.00007784769,0.00014906512,0.000118893455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923074,0.00017657675,0.00014674547,0.00013045954,0.00020316259,0.000112336485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029760654,0.00007402059,0.0001918349,0.000017210969,0.00039510298,0.000009133349,0.00016786045,0.00002974916,0.006801883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007123909,0.000052025098,0.00013200041,0.000013557244,0.00097236194,0.00016788983,0.000080957274,0.00010864908,0.000003688833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034578498,0.0002061675,0.00008701631,0.000011480499,0.00008865912,0.0000036584534,0.030443091,1.5380637e-7,0.000031933396,0.9650001,0.00059688475,0.00007300393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004627342,0.0016394937,0.021150231,0.0002965638,0.0003938282,0.000050986335,0.0675809,0.0000076107326,0.00015179095,0.076821126,0.82695395,0.00032619125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004710613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043283743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88817894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036023408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018975375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99410605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289257091","doi":"10.2307/20058717","title":"Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0418645297458982,"score_gpt":0.23632561349382386,"score_spread":0.19446108374792564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289257091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96849436,0.0014606069,5.884628e-7,0.016521415,0.00080977293,0.00012186009,0.00004134584,0.0000020404398,0.012547996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967726,0.000005851199,0.0000024763428,0.00051973626,0.0011589067,0.0000010987764,0.0000016815751,0.0000060053894,0.0015316815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989093,0.0002765785,0.00034143095,0.00007222088,0.00012738131,0.0002730936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911064,0.0002993937,0.00015647076,0.00013079593,0.0001609191,0.00014175975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006611353,0.000082845145,0.00022713399,0.000070682996,0.0008206359,0.000088287474,0.0002676773,0.00004385949,0.0003621783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053480908,0.00004042036,0.000082743376,0.000025320136,0.005219861,0.0000427633,0.00001672873,0.00030017205,0.0000060447237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013173535,0.000038511316,0.0008985758,0.0000042455035,0.000049824783,0.000009427347,0.013650508,0.0000034988275,0.0000015669582,0.9831278,0.002161141,0.000041764015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011520963,0.00023975321,0.0051344344,0.000011229023,0.00010501927,0.000040504823,0.008863271,0.000005704013,0.0000050019694,0.8805542,0.10381677,0.00007201505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017384049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073640876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10257356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035949834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021770711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291124257","doi":"10.1057/s11231-022-09361-y","title":"Clinical Spinoza: Integrating his Philosophy with Contemporary Therapeutic Practice, by Ian S. Miller, Routledge, Abingdon and New York, 2022, 348 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Psychoanalysis","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.07667875503060545,"score_gpt":0.3142916903370485,"score_spread":0.23761293530644306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291124257","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15394053,0.13328993,0.0025901713,0.51188475,0.0048117554,0.0011332021,0.00036983466,0.00017503809,0.1918048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813542,0.0007028268,0.00058750896,0.0134955095,0.0021346163,0.0000068940003,0.000012420366,0.00004469245,0.0016613754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964194,0.0011612802,0.0010371165,0.00032449563,0.00073167786,0.0003259941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680865,0.000741175,0.0015365948,0.00038555643,0.00016733562,0.0003607098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013585442,0.0002958439,0.0008601824,0.00014904412,0.0006160204,0.00016118311,0.00058529177,0.000024736999,0.0012920708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009616642,0.00017055638,0.00048638615,0.00038954298,0.0010635684,0.00024494043,0.00008920384,0.00120216,0.000007549898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011742179,0.00447359,0.008283493,0.00005563114,0.017873973,0.000302471,0.025084326,0.00021700075,0.00008028351,0.20560004,0.5044397,0.2218473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011787458,0.0032337173,0.000061308565,0.000057782938,0.0011086322,0.00019435983,0.017175946,0.00019754635,0.0000014606575,0.013928779,0.96252525,0.0003364426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038167415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015392798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000624944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011840876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294982935","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190220945.013.12","title":"Spinoza’s Failed Rhetoric of a Supposedly Inconspicuous Transition to Secularity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Rhetorical question; Prudence; Politics; Rhetoric; Enlightenment; Philosophy; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Literature; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03939136707443369,"score_gpt":0.2064943817225714,"score_spread":0.1671030146481377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294982935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007883235,0.00004781661,0.000032202748,0.00027390884,0.00047309868,0.0005281562,0.0018029541,0.000069564965,0.99598396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08108842,0.00006987464,0.00006494518,0.00035249357,0.0004958743,0.0000032928479,0.00023236439,0.00005196453,0.91764075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984964,0.00006761728,0.000292573,0.00042081933,0.00041610133,0.0003064612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903816,0.00006118274,0.000151467,0.000376519,0.000133759,0.00023890768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000080157464,0.00034313466,0.0005207055,0.00020942124,0.000330664,0.000038143917,0.00042194605,0.00019299025,0.0045785955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000053619437,0.0003742016,0.00041090703,0.000007554656,0.00029169052,0.000092275586,0.00027530274,0.0005233295,0.0000058535447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002456642,0.000058055626,3.6408335e-7,0.00012933186,0.0001692636,0.00009953976,0.0028960956,0.000003835912,0.000007791505,0.9949569,0.0005428753,0.0008902674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005068681,0.00032492683,0.0000028262793,0.000086194945,0.00025891312,0.0000029336086,0.00012121721,0.0000050944295,0.00004502003,0.018354824,0.97989494,0.00039626262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027309943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007465205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97935206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000184084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006588615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301499090","doi":"","title":"Aristotle on justice in exchange: commensurability by fiat","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commensurability (mathematics); Economic Justice; Fiat money; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Law; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.018784875597106544,"score_gpt":0.18439875317551974,"score_spread":0.1656138775784132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301499090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93965435,0.00004192801,0.00026960307,0.010005569,0.00050911115,0.0002142689,0.0004874169,0.00011165723,0.048706066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99213797,0.000042133557,0.000056779623,0.00021662272,0.00011819561,7.600214e-12,0.000021036356,0.000008314966,0.007398955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864185,0.00022756864,0.00015048689,0.00036037783,0.00023320521,0.00038651493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998791,0.0005550878,0.000121883524,0.0002583246,0.00009797012,0.00017573056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001595363,0.0001859859,0.00028913596,0.00013182987,0.00035665408,0.000013809175,0.00039131058,0.000081507445,0.0016222756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043628905,0.00017361737,0.0001458379,0.00009345269,0.00052212167,0.00014827895,0.00023281002,0.00020977379,0.00012768297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013818411,0.0027640506,0.0013371658,0.00044176087,0.00021459056,0.00037395436,0.27160418,0.00005102114,0.00022286647,0.6172772,0.0777908,0.02654054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007198872,0.000475824,0.0036644223,0.00081588427,0.00030125276,0.0000040396967,0.17975856,0.0006838773,0.00018310323,0.0077469763,0.79799324,0.0011739415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067231467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044192793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72020245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003040232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029186394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306174607","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2022-4lqlm","title":"“Felicity” and “Makarismos”: Hobbes on Happiness and His Intellectual Sources","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Prosperity; Expansive; Politics; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Positive economics; Social science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; History","score_opus":0.06599571339275874,"score_gpt":0.25436261084782524,"score_spread":0.18836689745506652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306174607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5799818,0.0027640443,0.000025663792,0.011142635,0.0018601752,0.00049337134,0.00041104323,0.000260057,0.4030612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696794,0.00077340537,0.000032306412,0.0038917065,0.0019781124,0.00006699816,0.000105836865,0.000042012987,0.023430211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827754,0.00012422098,0.00033381506,0.000613132,0.00031150633,0.00033980745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988309,0.000567475,0.00007597965,0.00028517353,0.000042416083,0.00019804777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001504973,0.00039209338,0.00047433958,0.00014359214,0.0005029324,0.00038818608,0.00023836418,0.0001491429,0.018255329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117842035,0.00029864564,0.00012568441,0.00002520285,0.00061371754,0.00005392286,0.0012746848,0.0009487013,0.00004333961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007113742,0.00017574165,0.000058152633,0.00020438676,0.000118211574,0.000009235098,0.01639501,0.000006109408,0.0000015650506,0.97346616,0.007073219,0.0024210613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022290928,0.00020041817,0.0000797057,0.00007361115,0.00006339362,0.0000044894214,0.0020959363,0.0001628879,0.000027353622,0.171399,0.8252437,0.00042660645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055897265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007133879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8181705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003440247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023840108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309423660","doi":"10.51619/stk.v98i2.24620","title":"The Freedom of Religion Is a Divine Idea","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Modernity; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030441717408114126,"score_gpt":0.24167231978827655,"score_spread":0.21123060238016242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309423660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7959738,0.003396948,0.000011882444,0.026436964,0.0035309189,0.0010441913,0.00066438207,0.00026397,0.16867699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903879,0.00008793406,0.000015221613,0.0011855519,0.0006099226,0.00009334944,0.00002001764,0.000020726255,0.0075793867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981207,0.00027958478,0.00047944,0.00029591133,0.0004044163,0.00041992633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871534,0.00043640088,0.00016700184,0.00050667283,0.00008399958,0.000090577625],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048599468,0.00018928284,0.00028326493,0.000059833557,0.001153317,0.00005739616,0.00051716424,0.000036821937,0.0039223246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013410252,0.00012334231,0.00023011111,0.00009558022,0.00074962433,0.0000742479,0.00042007322,0.0003804317,0.00011093333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009045467,0.00038721698,0.0014028681,0.000009430719,0.00007080183,0.000014593957,0.002979552,0.000013909628,0.000025085295,0.9629501,0.031504426,0.0005515562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041964807,0.00076294394,0.00051753334,0.000006225303,0.000047027806,0.0000067073106,0.001317885,0.000065729306,0.00006542376,0.18942887,0.8071925,0.00016947843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089723384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024867628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7756881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023372142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026462885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309767496","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229","title":"Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0785813972591514,"score_gpt":0.30581475664917307,"score_spread":0.22723335939002165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309767496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11112027,0.020847823,0.0000139504455,0.79443187,0.0069825384,0.00029936424,0.0002579163,0.000018560591,0.06602771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99192524,0.0006693335,0.000026429063,0.0029923287,0.0041657165,0.000005227842,0.0000019160502,0.0000107997175,0.000203004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978262,0.00020670054,0.00072383165,0.00012978396,0.00096318364,0.00015029905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980659,0.0006927201,0.00044725812,0.00010311875,0.0006150322,0.000075978576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060831674,0.00014877332,0.0004388771,0.00012632148,0.0002093524,0.000038877068,0.00057048025,0.000020678512,0.0009585787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036033275,0.0000868148,0.00029924585,0.000046890058,0.0017051229,0.00012972286,0.0004891738,0.0004694567,0.000010090204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078407524,0.0001981601,0.00006953366,0.000017255103,0.00085863087,0.000039577335,0.004862957,0.000015923903,0.000009776521,0.9919074,0.0007626028,0.0004740721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019073607,0.00030149453,0.00006147849,0.000045048888,0.00008585637,0.00010127988,0.0012156754,0.000018619505,0.000022504419,0.9156096,0.08053644,0.000094660085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010277577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012974473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88080496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060648854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024187753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310532560","doi":"10.33137/rr.v45i2.39762","title":"Milton’s Shakespeare: Imitation and Originality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Philosophy; Nothing; Majesty; Imitation; Agency (philosophy); Literature; Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.040685722196810804,"score_gpt":0.24542228481928083,"score_spread":0.20473656262247003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310532560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85864943,0.002688376,0.000042583448,0.012275705,0.000688532,0.00029535888,0.00012700289,0.00011455984,0.12511843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998065,0.00011935222,0.000021377025,0.00060621806,0.0002619989,0.000021768115,0.00005957526,0.00000472702,0.0008399851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994374,0.00004983041,0.00014384242,0.000105527324,0.00014484608,0.00011855839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978566,0.00002175273,0.000048190243,0.00006658351,0.00002507659,0.000052711748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014244103,0.00006824329,0.00008132529,0.00003406244,0.00058071234,0.000058828075,0.000038728307,0.0000147131,0.0004215927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008879437,0.00005080947,0.000021177126,0.000027361153,0.00011383411,0.0002837362,0.000042615357,0.00011171653,0.000012216681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003188384,0.000033333934,0.00015192141,0.00007263191,0.000008873207,0.00000110806,0.0055425614,0.0000024905023,0.000023588178,0.98729354,0.0021739965,0.004664099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027888676,0.00010297417,0.0016023314,0.00001442076,0.000012014679,0.000012330945,0.0011541876,0.00032813207,0.000042512573,0.06310843,0.9332238,0.00012001311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004500171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008963029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93104976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028582192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005946631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46161443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311534887","doi":"10.51151/identities.v19i1-2.496","title":"Freedom is a Point of Departure, Not a Horizon","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Identities Journal for Politics Gender and Culture","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Horizon; Criticism; Biography; Sociology; Citation; Politics; Classics; Philosophy; Art history; Law; History; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06542715027492392,"score_gpt":0.28031108901496476,"score_spread":0.21488393874004086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311534887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39757633,0.04079854,0.0012203351,0.024273017,0.03025654,0.0025844816,0.02983776,0.00030695985,0.47314602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961426,0.0002203895,0.000093942246,0.0024573207,0.0027077685,0.000027194272,0.000040711697,0.000026096648,0.033000555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852026,0.00006448888,0.00041004314,0.00017176529,0.0004187773,0.0004146722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992527,0.000058496495,0.00014238234,0.00012425863,0.00020938824,0.00021277834],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017828993,0.00018320075,0.00028040248,0.000088495355,0.0012195694,0.00021651115,0.0002103658,0.00004904148,0.0022202511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003191502,0.00014545138,0.00031246556,0.000031519034,0.00025989077,0.00018148508,0.00012426508,0.00039999787,0.0000041080148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041487747,0.000097916134,0.000021426498,0.00010387607,0.00014316525,0.000009788882,0.020176163,0.0000031291156,0.000037055783,0.8885781,0.09074065,0.000047252444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048527253,0.0003534446,0.0000138682535,0.000010426146,0.00009919667,0.00020651033,0.010092104,0.00001866085,0.00014250865,0.51241964,0.47601375,0.00014460324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003086894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054294364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5638497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005080308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041517786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312039558","doi":"10.1017/s1369415422000541","title":"Ido Geiger, Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World: A Transcendental Reading of the Critique of the Power of Judgment Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022 Pp. xiv + 225 ISBN 9781108834261 (hbk) £75.00","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Geiger counter; Power (physics); Theology; Epistemology; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.046358073295605026,"score_gpt":0.25960508308420627,"score_spread":0.21324700978860123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312039558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30465263,0.4130865,0.000010715716,0.14967361,0.0035481176,0.0071536833,0.0061067124,0.00005706914,0.11571095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98109525,0.011655292,0.0000026396394,0.0022547916,0.00008322802,0.000012860132,0.000005706402,0.000017579343,0.0048726574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968863,0.001209159,0.0007020693,0.0002681704,0.0006556558,0.00027860893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839497,0.00028207322,0.0004288507,0.00072316546,0.00010278138,0.00006816749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007437942,0.00022493169,0.0006726638,0.000031779196,0.00047530807,0.000015680176,0.00094061345,0.000038008166,0.0007646217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058512698,0.00010671325,0.00075485924,0.00026595462,0.0015435176,0.00006943871,0.00055440917,0.00052717444,0.0000011005567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001269121,0.00036058895,0.00062787504,0.0017996642,0.0002021077,0.000003270919,0.002039433,0.0000015594774,0.00008958402,0.96115565,0.03336131,0.00023205944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001106717,0.0000895808,0.0033818523,0.002495952,0.00076439296,0.000026013533,0.0015143004,0.000022482773,0.0012439457,0.0011239825,0.98799825,0.00023253585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003784238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049538543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004971382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008569721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83720714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312050266","doi":"10.1177/03061973221139270","title":"The freedom dilemma: Milton's (and Adam's) inability to reconcile reason and authority","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literature & History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Paradise lost; Sermon; Dilemma; Scholarship; Adam smith; Politics; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Literature; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Political science; Theology; Economics","score_opus":0.023027892321749076,"score_gpt":0.2066878440560039,"score_spread":0.18365995173425484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312050266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8135003,0.055446595,0.0000019071753,0.02652572,0.008502871,0.0013291936,0.0007995145,0.0002234305,0.09367049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728986,0.00003566393,0.000036934358,0.0017564282,0.0012491649,0.00013807342,0.000025970003,0.000018075365,0.02384107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985456,0.00031892187,0.00021759738,0.00038316354,0.0002597472,0.00027498006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990941,0.00022734198,0.000046745816,0.00033941303,0.00007869892,0.0002136733],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045819586,0.00017359812,0.00019499757,0.00004237046,0.0011171116,0.00014767062,0.00019035266,0.000043654836,0.0009896577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013987094,0.00012466213,0.000069070564,0.000044718403,0.0003548925,0.0001251482,0.00024666818,0.000567477,0.000008019757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015582415,0.00019478428,0.0003801307,0.000037408827,0.00002305731,0.000024574598,0.042000305,4.650141e-7,0.000007868548,0.8591349,0.09509922,0.0029414666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021331219,0.0002870112,0.0012888822,0.000013642492,0.000020263296,0.000009157358,0.0005587015,0.000010073025,5.526216e-7,0.025407242,0.9720393,0.00015187875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023541489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000196791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002927022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034611407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312271388","doi":"10.7202/1084472ar","title":"The Shapes of Modernity: On the Philosophical Roots of Anthropological Doctrines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophical anthropology; Epistemology; Sociology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08617476079172452,"score_gpt":0.28474341836620015,"score_spread":0.19856865757447562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312271388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22864778,0.0052709132,0.000009172019,0.340452,0.0009052095,0.00032892247,0.00030221714,0.0000565947,0.4240272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415725,0.00030530084,0.0000067432825,0.0011251356,0.0010611017,0.0000038206294,0.000008460181,0.0000068056233,0.003325383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989477,0.00014473054,0.000261292,0.00016396512,0.00028323557,0.00019910002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990464,0.00040062357,0.00007545513,0.00021955556,0.00020054767,0.00005746173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000106075386,0.00013417569,0.00021951667,0.0000093367535,0.0002946648,0.000046740595,0.00026076252,0.00008096387,0.002428646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024979745,0.000053077194,0.00020021589,0.000049108847,0.001201228,0.00003473394,0.00008870578,0.00029979573,0.000048622045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042381267,0.00020927556,0.000017151124,0.000019859368,0.000050397903,0.000006010099,0.0012206851,0.0000025825216,0.00022348043,0.99513006,0.0027987724,0.0002793324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017209342,0.00014541387,0.00019620742,0.00004737449,0.000033040986,0.000005018448,0.0015018657,0.00004274771,0.0022917702,0.7086827,0.28678712,0.000094637704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073689594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001747902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7655095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000703091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017068265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312319156","doi":"10.15581/016.61.41670","title":"Javier HERVADA, Critical Introduction to Natural Right, Libraire Wilson &amp; Lafleur inc., Montréal 2020, 2ª ed., suprevised by Carlos José Errázuriz and Petar Popović, with linguistic consultant Dawn Eden Goldstein, translated from Spanish by Mindy Emmons for the first edition (supervised by Ernest Caparros), XVII + 135 pp., ISBN 978-2-92497-406-3","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius Canonicum","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.009390506827487974,"score_gpt":0.21437214763738505,"score_spread":0.20498164080989706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312319156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5253774,0.13714413,0.00028613745,0.26726422,0.008647605,0.004130193,0.054512553,0.00051129085,0.0021264392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686139,0.00051835197,0.00023547796,0.003798256,0.008424861,0.00030937424,0.008269174,0.00015965391,0.009670939],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637586,0.00021053935,0.00074630947,0.0011270598,0.00061001367,0.0009302132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997339,0.00091213436,0.00012060888,0.00056483265,0.0005243716,0.00053902814],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015390248,0.0006704975,0.0007666885,0.000040240608,0.0010970382,0.0005794082,0.00035231496,0.00025562962,0.0017485187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038878992,0.0004918235,0.00021201582,0.0001656234,0.0007339715,0.00037156814,0.00009243077,0.00068286055,0.00004700917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012405341,0.0008137795,0.000106739884,0.00027507535,0.00052628195,0.000106444626,0.0059165317,0.000006101367,0.004142416,0.012223274,0.9739655,0.00067732244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024124777,0.00037206465,0.00006137493,0.00020589508,0.0006381521,0.00005754814,0.00052695774,0.0003858743,0.0016493663,0.0012879019,0.99162364,0.0007787443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005755581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01195874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4432365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012994718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020269761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312603535","doi":"10.57027/eikasia.97.234","title":"Bayle y Voltaire: la apuesta por la tolerancia","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Eikasía Revista de Filosofía","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Service de Recherche et d'EXpertise en Transformation des Produits Forestiers","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.021126808521315762,"score_gpt":0.26079966499742735,"score_spread":0.23967285647611158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312603535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1032912,0.03628844,0.00015038137,0.027884303,0.001985722,0.00076819194,0.0031356907,0.0005382721,0.8259578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95527434,0.0015473742,0.00029266908,0.0048338263,0.006503287,0.000045188925,0.0003638244,0.00015051852,0.030988947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952555,0.0011179782,0.0009399797,0.00089915906,0.00065312383,0.001134291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966323,0.0011436396,0.00023042604,0.0009491327,0.0003374093,0.0007070961],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065531535,0.0007016426,0.0009557789,0.00010436052,0.000620174,0.0024524918,0.0005484854,0.00044473022,0.012985771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069145043,0.00065896113,0.00070682913,0.000192086,0.00079998706,0.00030345353,0.00035003325,0.0010915063,0.0015803755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081529564,0.00075092766,0.0007969975,0.0008032269,0.0002141859,0.0011509606,0.001044825,0.0000012742689,0.00014899393,0.95393515,0.03762933,0.0034425792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078471744,0.00012299481,0.0012696197,0.0009244542,0.00027812034,0.00016625637,0.00016854222,0.0000797457,0.00021198342,0.051081363,0.9441316,0.00078057195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067114655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000098402725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9065023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016033734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004179988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312641190","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_840","title":"Spinoza, Baruch","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Monism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Exposition (narrative); Literature","score_opus":0.07263467058,"score_gpt":0.22919957706643493,"score_spread":0.15656490648643492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312641190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018086195,0.0005900329,6.887597e-7,0.003430469,0.001450751,0.00016752323,0.0004941911,0.00015668981,0.99370784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027646215,0.00018582112,0.000010424363,0.0039773644,0.004110848,0.000013314514,0.00019425826,0.00006760725,0.9886757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863356,0.000010868079,0.00032498853,0.00034577708,0.00039299324,0.00029181544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992558,0.0001376092,0.00007049378,0.0003246153,0.000046185847,0.00016531405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006167342,0.00031854075,0.00034333402,0.0000824261,0.00031411345,0.00008659384,0.00027728773,0.000112205766,0.6945972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014186921,0.00025705533,0.00033667157,0.000004242282,0.0002669199,0.00006847535,0.0001958126,0.00058452383,0.004162488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056266376,0.000034645996,3.1676004e-7,0.000026623533,0.00004723848,0.000024481196,0.00020957751,5.27164e-8,1.6572733e-7,0.9521371,0.046616923,0.00089722965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006832402,0.000071411116,3.01037e-7,0.000013695254,0.000032888638,0.0000023976515,0.00001369814,9.337291e-7,8.5102823e-7,0.4140497,0.58552915,0.00021666838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004481649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002375861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6904347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005888964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027015927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313158501","doi":"10.15581/009.30.30645","title":"Hunter, Graeme (ed.): Spinoza: The Enduring Questions, University of Toronto Press, Toronto/Buffalo/London, 1995, 182 págs.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Filosófico","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027781216287791455,"score_gpt":0.23119183880184926,"score_spread":0.2034106225140578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313158501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09716025,0.036920723,0.00005677257,0.005961853,0.004497745,0.0011283769,0.0009376325,0.00047312083,0.85286355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851753,0.0017128907,0.00006601402,0.0005874419,0.002172099,0.0000046240757,0.000059215123,0.000025875499,0.010196503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983725,0.00013472102,0.00034639004,0.00035839409,0.00031744022,0.00047056584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874294,0.000106725514,0.0001451337,0.0005653713,0.0002771292,0.0001627186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018118868,0.00025610215,0.00031330285,0.000010433391,0.00069172523,0.00009921055,0.00056535704,0.00010422519,0.008416412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050368526,0.00019557781,0.00018392404,0.00001984062,0.0008801242,0.00053797726,0.00020597603,0.00020093111,0.0002079493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011363737,0.00034426208,0.0002585774,0.00005114117,0.0001322043,0.000008874666,0.005484141,4.891988e-7,0.00006739677,0.9292733,0.06248554,0.001780401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045840014,0.00027296363,0.0025911676,0.00007862045,0.00009810267,0.000003958282,0.000627865,0.00005216448,0.00023889146,0.0066334014,0.9886716,0.0002728852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19380723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06661422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001517537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049305043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99249005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317396195","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2023.2164951","title":"Was Spinoza a Pagan?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.07508027488688944,"score_gpt":0.2539203822975862,"score_spread":0.17884010741069672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317396195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096328236,0.0001309364,0.0000037589255,0.016910223,0.0011116368,0.00013357853,0.000046075198,0.0004929069,0.88484263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384756,0.000025293964,0.000002829821,0.0025748934,0.0048843394,0.0000034594768,0.00001986551,0.000037423357,0.053976297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987966,0.00029706466,0.0001889438,0.00017642953,0.00018776338,0.0003532274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993832,0.00011822127,0.000033222495,0.0003367541,0.000029759518,0.000098822486],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000417992,0.00013291996,0.000113378715,0.000042958887,0.00040001844,0.00019892665,0.00038412894,0.000010983448,0.0018256672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059232443,0.00007677488,0.00011718367,0.00008299502,0.000286913,0.00015752367,0.00016697704,0.00020377824,0.023114229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008298624,0.00003566843,0.000006240683,0.000009855076,0.000021927892,0.00005528339,0.004161475,0.0000016280899,0.000020477819,0.9423909,0.049591463,0.0036967748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018245351,0.00003806598,0.0011113278,0.000018765564,0.000017085495,0.0000037628643,0.00048119368,0.000036520276,0.000021806296,0.038706224,0.9592509,0.0001318511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029737987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050067947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008384981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006389427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317716316","doi":"10.1017/s0034670522001000","title":"Commentary - Timothy W. Burns: Leo Strauss on Democracy, Technology, and Liberal Education. (New York: State University of New York Press, 2021. Pp. 201.)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); State (computer science); Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.05701286610060848,"score_gpt":0.27359157188396954,"score_spread":0.21657870578336105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317716316","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025703445,0.41090682,0.000015274953,0.49514687,0.0015496911,0.0019185352,0.0017376551,0.00022430302,0.062797405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15880725,0.62542844,0.0006803501,0.031282388,0.005479206,0.0000088472825,0.0005305459,0.00012539701,0.17765759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989486,0.000097191914,0.00031309505,0.00015939615,0.00018593854,0.00029579407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.00016659874,0.00015163948,0.000367768,0.00005848193,0.00016448082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015962326,0.00015912252,0.0003531991,0.00005967343,0.00017765032,0.000017586839,0.0003361045,0.000046356992,0.0007728427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003757539,0.00011548469,0.00011205316,0.00012252646,0.0006421772,0.000059312068,0.00013217158,0.00021262099,0.00007726696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006377874,0.00007838644,0.00002238939,0.0008347332,0.0000481376,6.9681636e-7,0.0005607892,4.7201374e-7,6.805355e-7,0.5736601,0.420014,0.00477323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016329189,0.00009211442,0.00007266694,0.0019754132,0.0001249589,0.000001853741,0.0004382021,0.0000042692773,0.00002735562,0.24975559,0.74724364,0.00010064227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011255731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017295557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46386448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002710601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000126844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8462085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455187","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.017","title":"Jacobi’s Impact on Idealism and Romanticism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; Idealism; Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Art history; Art; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05807584909639213,"score_gpt":0.22781796253833206,"score_spread":0.16974211344193993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071051245,0.00008074645,0.0000018784206,0.00017894061,0.00060532475,0.0002809479,0.0016849278,0.00022951691,0.9962272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031439636,0.00014758126,0.0000018404409,0.00031801924,0.0010214673,6.171533e-7,0.00010623616,0.0000718445,0.9668928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867743,0.000037514754,0.0001959247,0.00041332882,0.00029045786,0.00038535008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989255,0.00019433064,0.00011549417,0.00036575156,0.00008416167,0.00031472743],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006914431,0.00045332158,0.00047678006,0.00018401249,0.00033382574,0.00012287081,0.00028799204,0.00025139502,0.000089559944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009201055,0.00040142093,0.000331009,0.0000032420025,0.00058649987,0.000041140887,0.00027057566,0.0005372477,0.00017797157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100036435,0.000009178456,2.6527238e-7,0.00006589178,0.00019977521,0.0002641099,0.00027101845,3.5258373e-7,0.0000012446322,0.9592654,0.03953679,0.00028592133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043945372,0.00018451612,0.00002162601,0.00025856117,0.00022628072,0.000007451171,0.000050718947,0.000015055592,0.000008635077,0.0049505783,0.9933542,0.00048293325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033262826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049727078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9543148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009365982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031233205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455218","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.021","title":"Jacobi as Literary Author","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Feeling; Context (archaeology); Literature; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; History; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07234171670530089,"score_gpt":0.22644620130568283,"score_spread":0.15410448460038195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004520951,0.00017441012,0.0000034591135,0.0003749605,0.0014637181,0.00033139638,0.0016338831,0.0004763148,0.99549663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001236087,0.00007806765,0.000006492915,0.0005574261,0.0020504077,0.0000013037939,0.00024465527,0.00009800477,0.99572754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829113,0.00004845147,0.00026696513,0.00057038805,0.0003719888,0.00045105684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986833,0.0001635246,0.00014048484,0.0004988409,0.0001496887,0.0003641624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007792159,0.0004695026,0.00047974638,0.00020140166,0.00041095464,0.00016029013,0.0005379268,0.0003384193,0.00039875595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014734486,0.00048282347,0.00045636698,0.000004936136,0.00062593824,0.0001188039,0.00044893185,0.00071217684,0.0012626682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007380929,0.0000159904,1.0223836e-7,0.00010123324,0.00017344143,0.0005540213,0.0004354565,6.8786676e-8,0.0000011021164,0.891099,0.106884114,0.000661666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032457474,0.000087382825,0.0000011479624,0.00025800013,0.00021695219,0.000008133266,0.00004852629,0.000007217199,0.000015067202,0.012754425,0.9857313,0.00054726505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001362065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034103502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8788472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009983818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067042136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455229","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.010","title":"The Jacobi–Schelling Debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Determinism; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.06875441422419216,"score_gpt":0.20830846278425066,"score_spread":0.13955404856005849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001977319,0.00023716516,0.000010701235,0.00033402545,0.0013449519,0.00027368616,0.0004881668,0.0002861295,0.9970054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009531157,0.00048005112,0.0000033316405,0.00021814053,0.0016026474,0.000001095414,0.000057571513,0.000074572774,0.99660945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985621,0.000045268072,0.00023248403,0.00039644988,0.0003149763,0.0004487184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867475,0.00036706074,0.00013891741,0.00045960475,0.00014518632,0.00021449309],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012360152,0.00036142534,0.00031812862,0.000077712175,0.0010721207,0.0001989424,0.00060589676,0.0002079187,0.000046210047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015080584,0.00028955666,0.0003649507,0.000003667793,0.0008092185,0.00006192314,0.00034981963,0.0006596675,0.00039010003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048814014,0.0000058767105,5.8621318e-8,0.000041494186,0.00016801174,0.00015193239,0.00015606867,5.100041e-7,8.844824e-7,0.95969933,0.03909926,0.0006277627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020928406,0.00003419403,4.2770984e-7,0.00013232254,0.0001775728,0.0000030711647,0.00008090256,0.000028501789,0.000018900417,0.0040532504,0.9948981,0.00036346825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010909987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000139153235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95579886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000793706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042747888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455237","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.013","title":"Jacobi and the Revival of Socraticism: The Muenster Circle and Existentialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05320358500578087,"score_gpt":0.20238956445755343,"score_spread":0.14918597945177256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031715992,0.00044547944,0.00000388875,0.0009609367,0.00036400242,0.0003952455,0.00037097212,0.000038033868,0.9971043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023447702,0.0003516981,0.0000019935267,0.00040298788,0.00052033545,0.0000010142754,0.000014559841,0.000027177135,0.97523254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990582,0.000086865955,0.00020584825,0.0002546089,0.00020958505,0.00018490435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901736,0.0003483883,0.00014336589,0.0003180046,0.000089897505,0.000083000574],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016091343,0.00021189536,0.0003769826,0.000042718984,0.0003983482,0.00008651552,0.00026396007,0.00011308935,0.000021890119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001388874,0.00013785932,0.00018949728,0.000002837581,0.0027321458,0.000043651587,0.00039129745,0.00033514568,0.0000083216755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008241818,0.0000043823875,1.2244874e-7,0.00011158397,0.00015684111,0.000022034283,0.00097349373,4.795576e-8,0.0000010875685,0.99276316,0.005437995,0.0004468061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008590591,0.00003483358,0.000009810914,0.00019134567,0.0004956355,0.000008171918,0.00028742064,0.000019037312,0.000007742254,0.013186472,0.9847101,0.00019039915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015595056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066564567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013390765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015517393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455252","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.007","title":"Jacobi and Kant","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Autonomy; Philosophy; Fatalism; Mechanism (biology); Atheism; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06449410566163831,"score_gpt":0.20239728019074293,"score_spread":0.1379031745291046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007601114,0.00014067221,0.0000030813515,0.00017445319,0.0006291118,0.00021826696,0.0009792339,0.00022476497,0.9975544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018816015,0.00021413506,0.0000043488108,0.00023538283,0.0009722066,5.6294755e-7,0.00006003749,0.000054051205,0.9965777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988991,0.000023907158,0.00016252566,0.00040480748,0.0002121687,0.00029747345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991963,0.00011648192,0.000085820844,0.00027852735,0.00008361438,0.0002392531],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005248795,0.00031627403,0.00035240324,0.000115126015,0.00030483108,0.000091001086,0.00024268466,0.00019907992,0.0000792178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073433293,0.00031491162,0.0001863995,0.0000021727205,0.0006758821,0.000060762806,0.0003402167,0.00041944644,0.00015032626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035570974,0.000006306474,2.1051412e-7,0.00008647188,0.000116065996,0.00020717188,0.00017184552,4.390058e-8,0.0000011636499,0.96641195,0.03252478,0.0004384098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029335837,0.000050940867,0.000003082783,0.00014501298,0.00018057047,0.0000052347395,0.000047261205,0.000008014643,0.000008496669,0.0028435837,0.9960428,0.0003716571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001286319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067665273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9635684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004896161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026573063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320913076","doi":"10.5206/ls.2022.14638","title":"Review of Barducci's Hugo Grotius and the Century of Revolution, 1613-1718","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Intellectual history; Philosophy; History; Classics; Economic history","score_opus":0.07059268915087887,"score_gpt":0.29957667798148285,"score_spread":0.228983988830604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320913076","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018879885,0.88982654,0.000001305164,0.034958705,0.0013400265,0.00076887815,0.00021002376,0.000099360375,0.053915285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59570056,0.4002578,0.000009926184,0.001777029,0.0006439589,0.000038779835,0.000011498952,0.000012081167,0.0015483514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893606,0.00012459616,0.00040711512,0.00014678686,0.000191843,0.00019358251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990465,0.00039909832,0.00011148711,0.00019223185,0.00021236268,0.000038329126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037980726,0.0001257252,0.0004834425,0.000038441693,0.00019176392,0.000007318612,0.00011878155,0.000020596273,0.00016399073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041665896,0.000068794354,0.00014917576,0.000102050566,0.0013069065,0.00004468843,0.00015610975,0.000092824455,0.000030803654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033416636,0.000034196488,0.000056599492,0.0041907527,0.00020805863,0.0000010943849,0.004300246,1.0740273e-7,0.0000028095963,0.9477665,0.04258388,0.0008223277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007568993,0.0000924783,0.00037132297,0.0039864727,0.00022977676,0.0000022655527,0.0040098913,0.0000056037156,0.000047558817,0.18309836,0.8072465,0.00015284552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047643276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014035914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76466817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008945239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008580496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48153514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360918867","doi":"10.32881/jomp.247","title":"Spinoza’s Strong Eudaimonism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Greeks; Metaphysics; Naturalism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Reading (process); Subject (documents); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10089492881355468,"score_gpt":0.27843365206743814,"score_spread":0.17753872325388348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360918867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24051732,0.0027633905,0.00036101812,0.095292486,0.008228648,0.0003946242,0.00022741257,0.0003881819,0.6518269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937345,0.00009900976,0.00004769873,0.0009993274,0.007838306,0.0000024309259,0.000008151915,0.000034087006,0.0015975506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981999,0.000069012596,0.00060753943,0.00016239539,0.0005688512,0.000392337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896747,0.0001079991,0.00025190623,0.00020036,0.00020368659,0.000268588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028394282,0.00019942319,0.0003626943,0.0002465666,0.00021470254,0.0001170591,0.0003617582,0.00006774018,0.0007696937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005706027,0.0001500264,0.0003741482,0.00008391555,0.0002235855,0.0003421455,0.00008005541,0.0004307031,0.000511453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006647979,0.00014728405,0.000056671008,0.00003768966,0.00011217731,0.000121890946,0.0018102701,0.000055489083,0.00006871337,0.98900396,0.005574041,0.0029453195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005263063,0.00023255796,0.00014730208,0.0000823238,0.000047236023,0.000026209966,0.00007397721,0.00032367208,0.000059776783,0.85241336,0.14589682,0.00017046058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004789348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015734381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7488561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039969003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004345096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8427606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360988482","doi":"10.1108/s1572-832320240000033002","title":"When Mercantilism Upsets Neo-Classical Liberal Thinking: The Pandemic COVID-19 as a Revelation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Mercantilism; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Virology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Theology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Internal medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.0938627968419242,"score_gpt":0.2899934709354666,"score_spread":0.19613067409354243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360988482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002232107,0.0014553028,0.000028333912,0.08719263,0.0018774497,0.0004743803,0.00022705545,0.0004341801,0.90828836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011204057,0.00025037464,0.000023529781,0.027992956,0.006081134,0.000024391482,0.00023882468,0.00010256634,0.9540822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743724,0.00006507742,0.0006314985,0.00065220834,0.00075052906,0.00046345434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982448,0.0006185105,0.00013620246,0.00049067975,0.00008553131,0.00042424657],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032458646,0.0005679917,0.0005235544,0.00012478426,0.00058969203,0.00054749986,0.0005291172,0.0004533217,0.04935245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092603615,0.0003281647,0.0005451061,0.00001554617,0.0007994554,0.00014841887,0.00028642267,0.0014212884,0.0048650354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034765333,0.000021246988,0.0000014141027,0.000090826776,0.00018078511,0.000043261214,0.0044787736,4.5192894e-7,4.1838865e-7,0.8905638,0.10410115,0.00048311034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010754028,0.000041646595,6.6601336e-7,0.00009173592,0.00014833066,0.000020583804,0.000037537044,0.000026553333,3.3925565e-7,0.4991592,0.5001285,0.0002374043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017249408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024030397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39602733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019075428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002095277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362512908","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-23984-7_7","title":"Spinoza on the Ontology of Justice: The Role of ‘Beings of Reason’ (Entia Rationis)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Historical-analytical studies on nature, mind and action","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12405085328981116,"score_gpt":0.3075996616647347,"score_spread":0.18354880837492352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362512908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003097787,0.019919286,0.0000037091327,0.02131665,0.005057836,0.0007350782,0.00032589707,0.000041585496,0.94950217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7885743,0.0030854829,0.000006806267,0.0007616061,0.0019270881,0.000016141981,0.000027784994,0.000044786128,0.20555605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819905,0.00006650299,0.00067161577,0.00033345894,0.00053148787,0.00019788514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733675,0.0014982402,0.00049421133,0.0002920521,0.00031410911,0.000064655025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002692797,0.0002940786,0.000759386,0.00011402034,0.0003463371,0.000014698651,0.00018405975,0.00033058296,0.0003342677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049329275,0.00015539849,0.00037093475,0.000047718884,0.00088265544,0.00003800191,0.000077930876,0.0009030892,0.000029599318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001545724,0.000109692046,0.000002071749,0.00013594463,0.00054767553,0.0000019969657,0.00056340516,0.00000115575,0.000006651889,0.98936856,0.0073733306,0.0017349198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015753586,0.0004044858,0.000023563225,0.00021899313,0.0013036717,0.0000012888631,0.00058426015,0.000040322542,0.0001508667,0.24520758,0.7517393,0.0001681364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004022463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050788418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78547645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016138073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021305745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6336966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362562445","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-66398-1_8","title":"Herder und die immanente Gegenwart des transzendenten Absoluten","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Neue Romantikforschung","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.08138656343227961,"score_gpt":0.2731587935550228,"score_spread":0.1917722301227432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362562445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006332271,0.027363172,0.000058144913,0.006341182,0.010357579,0.0018632173,0.0039047857,0.0011718919,0.94260776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12130036,0.022030592,0.000098393044,0.0019455913,0.013818947,0.00009218193,0.0016206299,0.0009577411,0.83813554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929054,0.00014694511,0.0017613709,0.0016723314,0.0013621969,0.0021517822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966322,0.000503113,0.00045340217,0.001141248,0.00032444467,0.00094554946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043379603,0.0017274541,0.0017536882,0.00047736277,0.0017881443,0.00074220885,0.0011288474,0.0010047544,0.010422787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005841914,0.0015746893,0.0018101616,0.00008535263,0.0019065484,0.00046603807,0.0004638005,0.001906241,0.018979935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020910724,0.00024404337,0.000053440053,0.00092342653,0.0021038023,0.00096728595,0.0016441438,0.000008452229,0.000040614454,0.98840797,0.0029726594,0.0024250282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009811945,0.00036193768,0.00033001215,0.001394501,0.0015164339,0.000026154958,0.00015369395,0.00010890123,0.00004351256,0.24067196,0.75293076,0.0014809624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050831924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006304691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7499581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017405125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009263168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779046","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0003","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Humanity; Irony; Feeling; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Perfection; Epistemology; Sight; Wonder; Literature; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.21535875454361314,"score_gpt":0.35474281064102936,"score_spread":0.13938405609741622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08911269,0.0031320988,0.0000065902486,0.2060517,0.006080071,0.00053491106,0.000260108,0.0013855626,0.69343626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90527916,0.00032590097,0.000045227967,0.024014259,0.0039660856,0.00006755958,0.000014375716,0.000029339504,0.066258095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989984,0.00002925973,0.00020036097,0.00021313323,0.0001941748,0.00036465767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993535,0.00020355893,0.000016077453,0.00018381859,0.0001305679,0.00011243751],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011881217,0.00013055115,0.00021140104,0.000075150085,0.00039602967,0.0000617754,0.00011989901,0.00001637653,0.0006969794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003029478,0.000099181816,0.000087084045,0.00008402434,0.00026410085,0.000060357303,0.00017214777,0.000091016285,0.0039532958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063508514,0.000024072113,0.000024799378,0.000036886984,0.00006177288,0.000015195619,0.010861173,7.7850376e-7,0.0000041076023,0.7517915,0.2368067,0.0003666769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008496384,0.000070252165,0.00013048756,0.000033176926,0.000018968756,6.0210624e-7,0.0041028447,0.0000028449576,0.000033344604,0.15077908,0.8446161,0.0001272998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024182853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020429097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81616646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019064091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006052149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779157","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0005","title":"The Concealed Influence of Custom: Hume’s “Treatise” from the Inside Out by Jay L. Garfield","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Ignorance; Epistemology; Western thought; Buddhism; Enlightenment; Classics; Theology; History","score_opus":0.10595295251771787,"score_gpt":0.31245531412984323,"score_spread":0.20650236161212537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8383305,0.01959885,9.922271e-7,0.04958153,0.0017088265,0.0005431201,0.0007618812,0.00024774525,0.089226544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794998,0.002706704,0.000001949551,0.0017582802,0.0007637942,0.000050763505,0.000018346464,0.000013973768,0.015186368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871504,0.00011842509,0.0003510026,0.00020247784,0.00028287648,0.00033018523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971643,0.0022188162,0.00009950618,0.00031009826,0.00015536064,0.000051922776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018004495,0.00017868336,0.00029233936,0.00001702851,0.00086292025,0.000074385796,0.0003214183,0.000038207072,0.00026448874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039519937,0.00008650878,0.00011911187,0.000056738463,0.0013808126,0.00008136777,0.0002106833,0.000195655,0.00028626667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049553728,0.000054492994,0.0011936818,0.000034480843,0.00057824893,0.000008117769,0.039986998,0.0000058730748,0.000088329645,0.62239134,0.33439007,0.0012187706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003022478,0.000063278894,0.0019853597,0.000086328815,0.00008214735,2.5319733e-7,0.008962246,0.0000065441027,0.00025838055,0.11175689,0.87633437,0.0001619452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030164662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006492638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54194427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014517231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014311794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6636972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809817","doi":"10.1353/rss.2010.0014","title":"Poetic Emotion Versus Truth: Russell’s Preference for Spinoza Over Locke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Rationalism; Normative; Epistemology; Poetry; Preference; Economics","score_opus":0.11710014578770192,"score_gpt":0.3071857400285279,"score_spread":0.19008559424082597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426314,0.008616772,0.00016137079,0.0092199035,0.016329756,0.0007990026,0.00012221329,0.00007268361,0.022046868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98939836,0.003693271,0.00013339036,0.00035148146,0.0046930797,0.000010335168,0.0000054946513,0.000041945743,0.0016726296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759936,0.00015127148,0.0008975148,0.00024541764,0.0005230386,0.0005834165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645483,0.002093201,0.00045795468,0.0003239145,0.0004544811,0.00021560458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008874437,0.00040103242,0.00067975215,0.00012190312,0.0008423049,0.0001364702,0.0005359602,0.00012945861,0.0007966356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003436107,0.000219957,0.00047736117,0.000088615656,0.0007870254,0.00029107387,0.00006979296,0.00077672413,0.00006175104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052080504,0.0011049516,0.00010825357,0.0005246854,0.0023010166,0.0000200812,0.03269685,0.00003341227,0.0021019988,0.9320066,0.019780219,0.0041138656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007880321,0.002466892,0.0008833349,0.00038038765,0.0020179106,0.0000881803,0.005064148,0.0001330403,0.0043723336,0.20056811,0.77524865,0.000896714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030404408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001146967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7554684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004152026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052912867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89695865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367156997","doi":"10.7202/1094005ar","title":"Arash Abizadeh, \"Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Linguistics","score_opus":0.11109434343568528,"score_gpt":0.3194628827909417,"score_spread":0.20836853935525643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367156997","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067166775,0.492205,0.0000013950018,0.27270934,0.00067904685,0.0012275567,0.0002274128,0.00004730394,0.22618625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444831,0.04054658,0.00001002648,0.014118325,0.00044362384,0.0001541063,0.000012501957,0.000013594367,0.00021813193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980554,0.00068328314,0.00048805107,0.00020960439,0.00036422448,0.0001994604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873924,0.00073532603,0.0001699257,0.00025251147,0.00004685792,0.000056138208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010769912,0.00015391641,0.00048897346,0.00004781184,0.00030699896,0.000024333096,0.00030779355,0.00002084531,0.0024122735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020574212,0.00009501153,0.00016176418,0.00009788198,0.0008703551,0.00006882617,0.00021910101,0.00065029325,0.000021280515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025156301,0.000083412786,0.00006821466,0.0012037123,0.000022837437,0.000002791543,0.0017400193,0.0000015786421,7.736265e-7,0.9958054,0.00035138513,0.0006947133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053069263,0.00004302616,0.000024813844,0.0005910478,0.000048683512,0.000004861231,0.0000887131,0.000009172648,0.000002113165,0.6402637,0.35828906,0.0001041417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008818742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017371689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93776643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016426711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021184163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377092508","doi":"10.1080/01916599.2023.2214911","title":"Philosophy as Stranger Wisdom: A Leo Strauss Intellectual Biography","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of European Ideas","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.0831944663195488,"score_gpt":0.23605873490924212,"score_spread":0.15286426858969332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377092508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049567,0.0014276546,0.0000034787283,0.0010485473,0.0020046919,0.00014861401,0.00012458715,0.0003349344,0.9453405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94926316,0.00014548094,0.000016431854,0.0010620444,0.0020237085,0.0000048548263,0.00007100052,0.00006835275,0.047344945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982866,0.00021887601,0.00043149703,0.00033978824,0.00034327785,0.00037996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999102,0.0001541161,0.00010225011,0.00033187337,0.000095118965,0.00021463429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002532806,0.00023910806,0.00028501032,0.00037497206,0.00013714722,0.000028842973,0.00034424698,0.000037429454,0.011170192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103193925,0.0002154981,0.00035704803,0.00013944767,0.0011865125,0.00012367337,0.00008471808,0.00024793844,0.0053700022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007990975,0.0001611595,0.000012043374,0.00008037481,0.00008427452,0.000076372875,0.010446462,0.000001152461,0.00012938427,0.821505,0.16695201,0.0004718269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032240085,0.00020542354,0.00012917443,0.000067261186,0.000043862106,0.0000035240666,0.00029548985,0.0000069578496,0.000020466108,0.04924927,0.94940454,0.00025164286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007123756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017434364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8996962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007201666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044914686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378837385","doi":"10.21827/jss.2.1.38201","title":"External Conditions, Internal Rationality: Spinoza on the Rationality of Seneca’s Suicide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Spinoza Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Injustice; Epistemology; Reading (process); Individualism; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.25088626387791335,"score_gpt":0.3807092488971166,"score_spread":0.12982298501920325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378837385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93416303,0.0019181123,0.000030370618,0.05244825,0.0022804567,0.00020423057,0.00022066632,0.000032094307,0.008702757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932644,0.0005027037,0.000025315792,0.0019422936,0.0025508525,0.000008165882,0.0000071035442,0.0000105540375,0.0016886528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979613,0.00016159235,0.00083587586,0.00012735119,0.0006950321,0.00021889489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978415,0.00081797596,0.0004686129,0.00014870937,0.0006428992,0.00008032471],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079862017,0.00016787472,0.00039472088,0.00013673461,0.00034819267,0.00006478455,0.00025552057,0.000032523676,0.00093376543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056316436,0.00009677243,0.00031809922,0.000087131746,0.0006313649,0.0001876531,0.00008892563,0.00030242463,0.00007889034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009954204,0.00015507184,0.0014311223,0.00005196207,0.00044040562,0.000026266902,0.0019952983,0.000037161215,0.00017561417,0.97584414,0.019528627,0.00021476275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011163743,0.0007617874,0.05682658,0.0010394524,0.00020139564,0.000050823488,0.00629181,0.00006328282,0.0021687401,0.8490117,0.082155734,0.00031228035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025976056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018275694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12683243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057591627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055843702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378838785","doi":"10.21827/jss.2.1.38195","title":"The Desiring Constitutions of Community: A two-fold reading of Spinoza’s social philosophy in the Ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Spinoza Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Rationality; Ambivalence; Sociology; Friendship; Harmony (color); Reading (process); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Social science; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.49418455722322707,"score_gpt":0.4300825674678299,"score_spread":0.06410198975539716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378838785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8254964,0.0062828003,0.000012442666,0.11912454,0.001908296,0.0003573791,0.00008137098,0.000032013664,0.04670478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968029,0.0014444073,0.00001595425,0.0006130336,0.0010423983,0.0000040089694,0.0000010689325,0.000007721688,0.000068496716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788254,0.00054855586,0.00079000095,0.00005643476,0.00047117274,0.0002512769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996612,0.002344221,0.00042748434,0.00015634173,0.00042584827,0.000034071767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025799302,0.00013625172,0.00043658735,0.00014878181,0.0012568242,0.000043942142,0.0004343023,0.00004999316,0.000011841435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097482075,0.00007290379,0.0002560227,0.00018871676,0.0019911332,0.00012198217,0.00015664108,0.0011300835,0.0000048953148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040757193,0.00012272061,0.00022843566,0.0001352058,0.00025325705,0.000010627097,0.054587193,0.000012740809,0.00005038535,0.9432042,0.0010490365,0.0003054268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001115255,0.0004512045,0.0040951124,0.0010009618,0.00024477788,0.000025120149,0.10327484,0.000012123161,0.00015341316,0.8493127,0.04011778,0.00019669361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072048526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010812843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17130654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040813327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006887333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96666026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381623902","doi":"10.1017/9781009273497.003","title":"Faith","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Politics; Secularization; Aphra; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Religious studies; Literature; Theology; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.05291678805227602,"score_gpt":0.19730694428539203,"score_spread":0.14439015623311602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381623902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016211488,0.00017258558,0.0000036488373,0.00018192589,0.0008705593,0.0002609688,0.0017492347,0.0001828639,0.996562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015743838,0.00007883624,0.0000064715596,0.00045663785,0.001156007,0.0000011437344,0.00018620054,0.000056165834,0.99648416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986364,0.000043852953,0.00018689195,0.00044350963,0.0003549555,0.00033433642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990651,0.00008232121,0.00012705731,0.00041689686,0.0000825016,0.00022613144],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000054488664,0.00035777307,0.00037920618,0.00012087934,0.00055200147,0.00007560005,0.00050566596,0.00014623246,0.002257228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000046857544,0.00038013465,0.0003552557,0.0000022925515,0.0005263077,0.00008811083,0.00049213576,0.0007138245,0.000112037436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057736488,0.000017942448,8.417538e-8,0.0000480585,0.00012780781,0.00022731753,0.00018818122,2.1715374e-7,4.853087e-7,0.9208222,0.078221776,0.00028816366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003204629,0.0000807077,4.2378232e-7,0.000044560966,0.00019194912,0.0000063414345,0.000066164415,0.0000036968809,0.0000059726785,0.0012741404,0.99755377,0.00045182204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001924444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003526724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9195481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016559871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049208724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383426518","doi":"10.7202/1100789ar","title":"Remarques sur la réponse de Leo Strauss au problème de l’historicisme","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.2038204581310446,"score_gpt":0.33975833011998186,"score_spread":0.13593787198893725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383426518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036760036,0.02240076,0.00012990081,0.55289555,0.0035712013,0.0009080286,0.0013116294,0.0018202793,0.38020262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9128178,0.008064415,0.0003446313,0.0078982385,0.021393413,0.00014785536,0.0001461595,0.0002056371,0.048981845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519104,0.0010319233,0.00077407743,0.0006994223,0.00053866295,0.0017648973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692255,0.0013122062,0.00019053725,0.00055668136,0.00023472456,0.0007833028],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013537593,0.0006553796,0.0006910526,0.0002904354,0.000745165,0.00033290446,0.0005769603,0.0005041237,0.0012353441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054922444,0.00064410816,0.0005103111,0.00022286168,0.0013439638,0.00053857686,0.00023225175,0.0009492346,0.0010728611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014844426,0.00057612767,0.00024328445,0.0006172809,0.00018436149,0.000481722,0.0050781593,0.000018851262,0.00009156607,0.931858,0.059600998,0.0011012291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027765468,0.00020989103,0.0003836327,0.0003467697,0.00010964644,0.000040819777,0.00007619932,0.00028894492,0.00014240235,0.48437583,0.51331306,0.00043511105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030214288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018945178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87605774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010849679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005165767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383896281","doi":"10.33137/rr.v45i4.41404","title":"Hankins, James. Virtue Politics: Soulcraft and Statecraft in Renaissance Italy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; The Renaissance; Politics; Political science; Art; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.02857614279266839,"score_gpt":0.2492368118731241,"score_spread":0.2206606690804557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383896281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8615422,0.0035210822,0.000026682756,0.0126117,0.0006124976,0.00047982804,0.0001819302,0.0003566485,0.12066743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960144,0.0010995993,0.00001851937,0.00059173076,0.0004434601,0.000024030003,0.00008895361,0.000016392889,0.0017029148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988243,0.000046197223,0.0003452126,0.00022305723,0.00018896673,0.00037229186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995517,0.000058933343,0.00007247304,0.00014596537,0.00004332675,0.00012757909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020276816,0.00016941936,0.00022127737,0.00017821699,0.00027977672,0.00012628188,0.00007997427,0.000076017546,0.00006975654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037280664,0.00012540168,0.00003816912,0.000115898416,0.00034891762,0.0005758618,0.00006538219,0.0001866962,0.00015005267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027605442,0.000054256823,0.0005048516,0.00028489018,0.00001676272,0.00001276973,0.005588153,0.0000050832787,0.0000596537,0.98527783,0.0049529853,0.0032151307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012270922,0.00015150385,0.0067865266,0.00043540463,0.000019067651,0.000014663786,0.0020377699,0.0012154055,0.00034491858,0.2330468,0.7542597,0.0004611196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016401552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081400794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75223106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032689397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013053037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5113732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385760230","doi":"10.5325/miltonstudies.65.2.0252","title":"Milton and the Uses of Stupidity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Milton Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Stupidity; Innocence; Skepticism; Wonder; Relation (database); Criticism; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Agency (philosophy); Aesthetics; Literature; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.21037807040689216,"score_gpt":0.3296074011383439,"score_spread":0.11922933073145175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385760230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017086,0.016550709,0.0000010588001,0.023365898,0.0012826088,0.00036240145,0.00013179342,0.0001694366,0.0564275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891548,0.0030535164,0.0000046020477,0.000598648,0.0005755241,0.000024564293,0.000003794048,0.000008362504,0.0065761725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991867,0.00009451301,0.00021505414,0.00013766979,0.00017222759,0.00019381713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989823,0.0007093205,0.000045915884,0.00014348186,0.000084456,0.000034538716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028401625,0.00011244324,0.0002950013,0.000038987404,0.0003074138,0.000023778879,0.000099787445,0.000019358202,0.00012340258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018825821,0.00005845351,0.00008842529,0.000045573535,0.0015481845,0.000048285638,0.00017715817,0.00008380191,0.0000717774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056221725,0.000032155767,0.00023862341,0.00008748843,0.00017924403,0.0000023143564,0.017020646,3.81869e-7,0.00000866401,0.9662752,0.0154744815,0.00062453514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094385043,0.00007876723,0.0019641768,0.00006244489,0.00009465111,9.744377e-7,0.008358683,0.000019111865,0.00026031642,0.27275956,0.715314,0.00014348506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006384723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056299246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6998395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006180914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041423527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57043505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386617352","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000171","title":"Anna Tomaszewska, Kant’s Rational Religion and the Radical Enlightenment: From Spinoza to Contemporary Debates New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022 Pp. 226 ISBN 9781350195844 (hbk) $143.95","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07899308699770027,"score_gpt":0.28090221415012656,"score_spread":0.2019091271524263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386617352","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003475017,0.8206136,0.000010801197,0.16488568,0.000984542,0.0013407643,0.00027062537,0.00021073555,0.008208179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10595231,0.7813778,0.00011411916,0.09092224,0.0074533145,0.00023367339,0.0009234083,0.00011330232,0.012909823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691844,0.00037634248,0.0009123162,0.0006171234,0.00062603346,0.0005497563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982646,0.00052217115,0.00018273905,0.00044805082,0.00006157327,0.00052082574],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065008644,0.00040369405,0.0007934853,0.00006333748,0.0004669299,0.00016523917,0.0004970628,0.00014718289,0.0032118163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025181184,0.00025867662,0.00033574676,0.00022519927,0.00051777164,0.00021066272,0.00026332904,0.00049330504,0.0016942396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007060838,0.000033873046,0.00006953595,0.0002534737,0.00010648407,0.000028719234,0.0005632082,2.3915325e-7,0.000020258112,0.37934992,0.6144445,0.0050591826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008731786,0.000075370815,0.00014127762,0.0019884878,0.00017389837,0.00001276214,0.00004337071,0.000050952192,0.000053384552,0.07673364,0.9195143,0.0003393692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004880312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002283723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3050698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028095461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010407429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386764286","doi":"10.26443/arc.v34i.637","title":"On Obedience in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Politics; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0381777936722948,"score_gpt":0.27418167403746474,"score_spread":0.23600388036516995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386764286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8950518,0.008217236,0.000002824689,0.028909214,0.0008832597,0.00018982447,0.000015032513,0.000011528213,0.0667193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544364,0.0010857118,0.000019729654,0.0013449894,0.00084811857,0.0000026414752,1.667752e-7,0.000008467995,0.0012465138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816996,0.0002856947,0.0006499874,0.00010104436,0.00042637283,0.00036691673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809563,0.0010881581,0.00029145446,0.00024870344,0.00019677608,0.00007926866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005259188,0.00017292841,0.00040491554,0.00007303719,0.00021906043,0.000022215589,0.00054519554,0.000038452636,0.00009903188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008302551,0.000069295784,0.00026870958,0.00007355753,0.0011460093,0.000065289474,0.000145754,0.00045531496,0.000032589964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018620018,0.0002136405,0.0017303478,0.000018471674,0.00008238668,0.000014163464,0.0010911787,0.00007011716,0.00002969892,0.97849864,0.01800267,0.00006246824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005318442,0.00048726762,0.007063339,0.00027347967,0.00009761658,0.000035111065,0.0012714748,0.0000040207733,0.00029756088,0.9836811,0.006154484,0.00010271812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019426859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011098367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10039188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077668636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031866344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4222519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386765299","doi":"10.26443/arc.v38i.480","title":"Pannenberg on Spinoza’s Theory of Miracles: A Misunderstood Parallel?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.055256796307722254,"score_gpt":0.2776423918725619,"score_spread":0.22238559556483964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386765299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487334,0.009603414,0.0000052519945,0.020417927,0.0024209868,0.00025533483,0.000028108445,0.000013542346,0.018522033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99395174,0.0027673517,0.000052963755,0.0011366117,0.0009674608,0.000002041895,1.9831123e-7,0.000016860873,0.00110479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810624,0.00030137517,0.0007179328,0.0000993701,0.0005133442,0.00026171928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729896,0.0010690662,0.00070473325,0.00042496886,0.00040385002,0.000098428616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095415633,0.00020262817,0.00049548666,0.00007582575,0.00031361255,0.000020534611,0.0007692931,0.000052331117,0.00013825472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095959444,0.000087368586,0.00050165964,0.000057200665,0.0013017311,0.00007657239,0.00017330129,0.0007449869,0.000029610972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012163857,0.0005019638,0.0005314441,0.00015048445,0.0017907456,0.0000081073,0.022431087,0.00005796544,0.0012580352,0.9259797,0.04563619,0.00043789248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090336957,0.0007931984,0.0011213865,0.00042779464,0.0004454692,0.00004939047,0.009736831,0.000001506414,0.0014572892,0.9485031,0.03639049,0.00017018321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036285273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005460106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04521832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023692293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005328047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47962826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387128081","doi":"10.1086/scj5204131","title":":<i>Subjects of Advice: Drama and Counsel from More to Shakespeare</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sixteenth Century Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Advice (programming); Download; Law; History; Political science; Library science; Art; Media studies; Sociology; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.019485256267357205,"score_gpt":0.24479336582985875,"score_spread":0.22530810956250155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387128081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9163116,0.014832435,0.000034832763,0.014482064,0.004403987,0.00025260297,0.0009554079,0.000089840876,0.04863721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98830134,0.001649138,0.000494193,0.00462098,0.0031864133,0.0000036087522,0.0000591112,0.00003771178,0.001647493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979953,0.0001311994,0.00052889873,0.0003186331,0.0005518653,0.0004740752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848205,0.00018109597,0.00014644381,0.0002505703,0.00036369116,0.00057613844],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016898797,0.0002425258,0.00039313216,0.000081568134,0.00032542573,0.00027056623,0.00022091813,0.00008008924,0.005878434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115154166,0.00020036497,0.00018871768,0.000089526744,0.00024542393,0.00021481363,0.00011893947,0.00045081583,0.000083576575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094214716,0.0021361886,0.0042339647,0.0003194048,0.001082632,0.0012640692,0.06590561,0.00003320941,0.004154437,0.8225194,0.07310828,0.024300657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012852891,0.0001872543,0.0023867316,0.00031689194,0.00013481827,0.0001343228,0.0052035525,0.000027033058,0.001108631,0.032911684,0.9559028,0.00040095675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005817431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040212337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88279456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004093272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009109803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99503034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387183457","doi":"10.1163/18750257-bja10062","title":"Civilization and Its Others: American Imaginaries, State of Nature, and Civility in Hobbes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hobbes Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Social contract; Sociology; Civilization; Privilege (computing); Racism; Politics; Law; Colonialism; State (computer science); Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.0564986990626612,"score_gpt":0.3103405616053811,"score_spread":0.2538418625427199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387183457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765296,0.016441818,5.875277e-7,0.0033187037,0.0001702881,0.00015351472,0.00016628484,0.000060771163,0.0031584254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99098927,0.008046667,0.000006454613,0.0002481,0.0001129532,0.000014574336,0.000009548656,0.000010921644,0.0005615322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991471,0.00006604556,0.00021921145,0.00021870752,0.0001203984,0.00022852245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945474,0.0002566827,0.000060435334,0.00008588583,0.000093979324,0.000048255693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015651794,0.00013653137,0.00031049608,0.00010625402,0.00012650886,0.00003461484,0.000053899195,0.000020787193,0.000027121083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018104127,0.00010518045,0.000028184162,0.00013321199,0.00092012034,0.00013386732,0.00012209965,0.00013243826,0.0000051503853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010622169,0.00015375095,0.016397461,0.0007208519,0.00020942837,0.000014141522,0.034286927,0.0000034904615,0.00009303605,0.9399081,0.0013058345,0.0068007796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013480497,0.0006022743,0.14479704,0.0005417426,0.00010648032,0.0000037220539,0.024735883,0.00042385692,0.0008839793,0.6906531,0.13514026,0.0007636584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010777689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011928453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24925502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000137157385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072522243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42891344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387735195","doi":"10.32725/oph.2023.006","title":"Was early modern natural law secularized? The current debates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Opera Historica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Historical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Natural law; Humanism; Natural (archaeology); Law; Theocracy; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.04360705431452667,"score_gpt":0.2503163815119451,"score_spread":0.2067093271974184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387735195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084640354,0.025660489,0.000042441192,0.045710452,0.02836745,0.0011419802,0.00026642522,0.0014048048,0.8127656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97445035,0.00011689546,0.000007358364,0.0011012752,0.0020656344,0.00004279847,0.000042268814,0.000027453349,0.022145962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987074,0.00007779091,0.00022029535,0.00026106928,0.00031962543,0.00041377946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993479,0.0001210253,0.000033026135,0.0002986179,0.000078633784,0.00012075236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011082266,0.00018445824,0.00019174382,0.00004132402,0.0007748054,0.00016316515,0.00034232493,0.000033971257,0.00062541023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028040153,0.000110217006,0.00017723073,0.00008830556,0.0002999003,0.00014152906,0.00010859186,0.0003998367,0.0013409684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017650322,0.000064474516,0.000005867512,0.00001611267,0.000028849927,0.000009339329,0.0077281184,0.0000030670287,0.000028449285,0.96739113,0.019548016,0.005158927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017198117,0.000034657554,0.0000334508,0.000015668456,0.00002492975,0.0000010854969,0.00003959053,0.0004073425,0.000016091983,0.07069185,0.9283884,0.00017491501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032146488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067400615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9088404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114911716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019198535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388124794","doi":"10.24124/c677/2010144","title":"Justice as Economics in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Polity; Politics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.11596337369805337,"score_gpt":0.34921244587647954,"score_spread":0.23324907217842616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388124794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014352006,0.0027226654,7.491553e-7,0.18669693,0.0018082862,0.0003724361,0.00010582424,0.000036429523,0.79390466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92421585,0.0015277723,0.000040756113,0.072726116,0.000856563,0.000015676585,0.000007861894,0.000014214815,0.0005951589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969818,0.000077584875,0.00041870712,0.0004090578,0.00024708163,0.0018657605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957497,0.0003278692,0.000038067366,0.00039926436,0.00013218707,0.003352906],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001694752,0.00018270241,0.0003186625,0.00016859375,0.0005021312,0.00018645296,0.0006698418,0.0001124406,0.0047579957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031905456,0.00015324913,0.000105263774,0.00018602434,0.0024021524,0.00025599738,0.000063044994,0.0011905705,0.0011896797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.695325e-7,0.000023426348,0.00003208689,0.0002391274,0.0000015176216,0.000011530433,0.0001556132,3.897101e-8,0.0000026181426,0.9978868,0.0003356375,0.0013110741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057123154,0.00002074666,0.00017706868,0.0002953814,0.00002854607,0.000017618444,0.00006500031,0.000023966328,0.000008694406,0.31094435,0.6881741,0.00018740499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07215488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22710104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045210158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023730742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388222785","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0002","title":"Moral Theory","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moral obligation; Obligation; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Philosophy; Internalism and externalism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07012798883926831,"score_gpt":0.2258935994849091,"score_spread":0.15576561064564082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388222785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000023179002,0.0006120164,0.000001214522,0.0011675808,0.00060403935,0.00012195607,0.00020364998,0.00015276445,0.99713445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00519691,0.00017428919,0.000009154913,0.0038044632,0.004545269,0.000003958842,0.00009918552,0.000056108296,0.9861107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989641,0.000017039261,0.00026363222,0.00026976483,0.00022163132,0.00026383868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994073,0.000097902244,0.000042187345,0.00026694444,0.00003439362,0.00015130448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006123992,0.00030461067,0.00031066284,0.000060152433,0.00014191642,0.00009231763,0.00019428365,0.00016760163,0.4753403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000038376384,0.00021710838,0.00029371763,0.0000023146893,0.00045803428,0.000058080135,0.000043718002,0.0003620951,0.010603322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027792023,0.000021040592,7.2279825e-8,0.000012961013,0.000062605715,0.00001600866,0.00021686761,4.997827e-8,2.8425056e-8,0.9789317,0.015353462,0.005357415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052834053,0.000025964206,1.1930099e-7,0.000025963,0.000031389758,0.000001470281,0.000005454086,4.277853e-7,6.0571483e-7,0.49969414,0.5000009,0.00016074421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012114136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013395708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48464742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019922323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001624518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254364","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0003","title":"Initial Theory of Sovereignty","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Presentation (obstetrics); Sovereignty; Interpretation (philosophy); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Wish; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Linguistics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07719287521983392,"score_gpt":0.24749479886171827,"score_spread":0.17030192364188435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010797153,0.00035329288,0.0000025830573,0.00018400249,0.0004250952,0.00012548426,0.0007340114,0.00005959067,0.99810517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09059987,0.00014393679,0.000008761347,0.001314818,0.0029971623,0.000002501809,0.000120307945,0.00004445293,0.90476817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887955,0.000023875547,0.00039681207,0.00022601834,0.00026369313,0.00021003804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992994,0.00018062878,0.00009130613,0.000258863,0.00006116931,0.00010859678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007714281,0.00027464188,0.00041111247,0.00007071334,0.000080427744,0.000031878473,0.0001941593,0.0001876657,0.4964545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007635985,0.00020211659,0.00033798325,0.0000030916099,0.0006580344,0.000055727243,0.000051216746,0.00030891248,0.0020005002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007692837,0.0000395472,5.45142e-8,0.000037154994,0.00009660471,0.00000838672,0.0002650708,6.341354e-8,1.2295115e-7,0.9920045,0.0022345737,0.0052369926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008872793,0.00005007459,1.8351626e-7,0.00004947677,0.0000427062,0.000001136166,0.000011467857,2.6341354e-7,0.000007973526,0.5148689,0.48474592,0.0001331496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012333978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006701421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.494454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014319249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029395058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254680","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.001.0001","title":"The Logic of Leviathan","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); AND gate; Politics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Computer security; Algorithm; Logic gate; Law","score_opus":0.058577292024722574,"score_gpt":0.23969298507718242,"score_spread":0.18111569305245984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004517478,0.0017431086,5.9924184e-7,0.0021117607,0.00051619293,0.00013499853,0.00012575752,0.000040194976,0.9953229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019699035,0.0005658808,0.0000036272143,0.0011094869,0.0025680815,0.000005599396,0.000049199876,0.00002147437,0.99370676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899536,0.000033112596,0.0003324293,0.00016113995,0.00024057654,0.0002373919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992137,0.00028634505,0.00008324554,0.00029094692,0.000053472206,0.000072298615],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008049352,0.00019419123,0.00027738052,0.000027367736,0.00021204776,0.00006455509,0.00031331397,0.000112107686,0.031565186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011669373,0.00009737347,0.00026965034,0.000006763486,0.0006941943,0.000027119311,0.00004540379,0.00026788932,0.0009942146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010686132,0.000023807715,7.8708325e-8,0.000025151987,0.000039808925,0.0000016385592,0.00015908979,4.6682327e-8,6.723513e-8,0.85890424,0.13936476,0.0014706191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003717255,0.000038350794,3.6936726e-7,0.000027069533,0.000021715636,5.1398723e-7,0.0000112802445,5.9201e-7,0.0000013199932,0.4654508,0.534337,0.00007385681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019187142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003106552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3949722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002243891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005550967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254689","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0004","title":"Theory of Authorization","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Doctrine; Authorization; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061659602052528524,"score_gpt":0.2306996226420428,"score_spread":0.16904002058951428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003561345,0.00028695754,0.000031377567,0.00033470988,0.00037145536,0.00010217702,0.00016826445,0.00005502106,0.9986465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026426552,0.00015501444,0.000012241606,0.00044604042,0.001547776,0.0000017293503,0.00011215771,0.000031399508,0.9712671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922097,0.000016625429,0.00029110568,0.00016364151,0.00018275256,0.00012492211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995468,0.00009178115,0.00007327813,0.00016634584,0.000055197306,0.00006656886],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000065480795,0.00017672942,0.0002543113,0.00006374813,0.00006241764,0.000022625449,0.000115178475,0.00013471115,0.2080031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065660283,0.00013043678,0.0001776202,0.0000032444448,0.00030888597,0.000041787793,0.000022819577,0.00016493008,0.0008387742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002265531,0.000020813462,8.241164e-8,0.00002854524,0.000046416695,0.0000015233397,0.00033522214,1.1972594e-7,3.5929688e-7,0.99179703,0.0016985283,0.0060486766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037006695,0.000028635031,2.5688115e-7,0.00003760987,0.000030528612,3.10245e-7,0.000006368383,8.5417e-7,0.0000056892504,0.50546545,0.49430513,0.00008212356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000060513103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043855357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4926066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010527732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014537053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254788","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0005","title":"God","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Theism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06018809159784003,"score_gpt":0.22081015494677844,"score_spread":0.16062206334893842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018294849,0.00047489264,6.332062e-7,0.0024142012,0.00060552877,0.00011225793,0.00019109705,0.00014605944,0.9960535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025460299,0.00025418372,0.000009398989,0.0034366483,0.004937551,0.0000034053617,0.00009650579,0.00005079266,0.98866546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999013,0.000006307102,0.00025834097,0.0002601993,0.00021949125,0.00024266735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994757,0.000052349005,0.00003883802,0.00024830629,0.000034301556,0.00015045941],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002690753,0.00027944645,0.00029099738,0.000054619213,0.00012792395,0.00009145089,0.00017186317,0.00016043276,0.5492729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000024639844,0.00020549269,0.0002633836,0.0000021072235,0.0002959731,0.000049797185,0.000036921167,0.00032407115,0.016894415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000914985,0.000017985842,3.6206668e-8,0.000012866219,0.00004565164,0.000012692998,0.00014700818,2.9291536e-8,4.1048043e-8,0.9631127,0.032613367,0.0040284307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049843075,0.000024873843,8.727726e-8,0.000028100061,0.000024460913,0.0000014526285,0.0000026510324,4.948072e-7,7.392398e-7,0.47913802,0.5205725,0.00015679035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002282914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028896698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5323785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020593945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000149256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98387104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750843","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32743-8_1","title":"Truth, Power, and Life","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Obedience; Modernity; Faith; Autocracy; Physis; Power (physics); Philosophy; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Period (music); Aesthetics; Law; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.07847466045037677,"score_gpt":0.23988705908808264,"score_spread":0.16141239863770587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000149245325,0.00050237234,7.8708786e-7,0.003194293,0.0015523604,0.00011105868,0.00023281222,0.00023543435,0.99415594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009614007,0.00036636132,0.0000055514924,0.002478041,0.0022766523,0.000004109668,0.000052117168,0.000071089155,0.9851321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989543,0.000008056814,0.00026621905,0.00030836556,0.00021859865,0.00024443993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992098,0.00022360569,0.000049879654,0.00019632095,0.000045131128,0.0002752617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005558459,0.0002774417,0.0003350226,0.00007965862,0.00014491564,0.00012463608,0.00011604843,0.00016886699,0.034532152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000382023,0.00020610099,0.00016372337,0.0000039856604,0.00037346783,0.00004961616,0.000112176174,0.00030349774,0.0036864497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008035971,0.000009248602,2.1410615e-7,0.00003313039,0.000072626724,0.000014327272,0.00027212023,8.670939e-9,4.5580723e-8,0.9790462,0.02018165,0.00036235273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074512456,0.000038628055,0.0000014242777,0.0000346508,0.000025364885,9.2334295e-7,0.000026094816,7.1460835e-7,2.2674396e-7,0.46591112,0.5337287,0.00015764582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015205841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017822576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51354706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009909111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018384522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99708927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750923","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32743-8_4","title":"Justice, the Laws of Nature, and God","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Courage; Ethical egoism; Economic Justice; Moral courage; Virtue; Philosophy; Natural law; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.08678379807955285,"score_gpt":0.2724552656308807,"score_spread":0.18567146755132785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010394109,0.001047888,5.598024e-7,0.0043662926,0.0010016797,0.00013748492,0.00038241214,0.00005795801,0.9929953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01294288,0.0005950335,0.000005034103,0.0019885409,0.0021163998,0.000003432652,0.000035798017,0.0000383806,0.9822745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991754,0.000011180543,0.00024278388,0.00018834356,0.00022090986,0.00016138081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921745,0.0003497922,0.00007274831,0.00022159147,0.000069724854,0.00006867429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008327629,0.00019539252,0.00026817227,0.000044241428,0.00014592036,0.000050306662,0.00016625282,0.00021083116,0.0062464043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025093566,0.00010541797,0.00013858044,0.000005980392,0.0005797047,0.000029678824,0.00011835529,0.0005365959,0.00025371916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007926832,0.000008771559,1.8792971e-7,0.00012036299,0.0000704043,0.000004043027,0.0002171313,2.7711332e-8,1.7958207e-7,0.98224133,0.016845072,0.00048457214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004682279,0.00002303381,0.0000021906476,0.000046324545,0.00011114273,9.248797e-7,0.000033996967,0.0000017087513,0.0000019307265,0.4634953,0.53615767,0.000078964826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020763584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006790061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51931256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005550297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011044702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99466205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750925","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32743-8_3","title":"Self-interest and the Sovereign","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Sovereignty; Framing (construction); Doctrine; Politics; Law; Political science; Prosperity; Power (physics); Ethical egoism; State (computer science); Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.09093679368775844,"score_gpt":0.23449075967647023,"score_spread":0.14355396598871178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000034531906,0.00037537282,7.920652e-7,0.006765185,0.00074214826,0.00022702139,0.00011525976,0.0002359818,0.99153477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008014866,0.00064769835,0.0000072096154,0.002563176,0.0029375656,0.00000868041,0.000027366901,0.000055163833,0.9857383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910206,0.00002021973,0.0002471658,0.00024794866,0.00017037947,0.00021221503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914837,0.0004142035,0.000058197802,0.00023514424,0.00004301062,0.00010106493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117663585,0.00025723904,0.00031926864,0.00004096938,0.00021936982,0.00018412908,0.00018159984,0.00011875366,0.012657843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015234534,0.0001335054,0.0002016701,0.0000035868386,0.00072545663,0.00004099695,0.00016469846,0.0003666405,0.0025563147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026373711,0.000008335286,7.171207e-8,0.00004618054,0.00013261856,0.00000872565,0.0004698921,6.508849e-9,9.486843e-9,0.9879481,0.0110663455,0.00029333826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021640165,0.000016130762,2.0201226e-7,0.00003159737,0.00005300511,0.0000019955667,0.000026912117,0.0000072098424,2.0487849e-7,0.5016595,0.4978822,0.000104645405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024292047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008686294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48681584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012855735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001120764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388756295","doi":"10.3998/ergo.4630","title":"The Affirmative Mind: Spinoza on Striving under the Attribute of Thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Equivocation; Construals; Epistemology; Negation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Psychology; Construal level theory; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.22702362947340227,"score_gpt":0.403966391006737,"score_spread":0.1769427615333347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388756295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6984244,0.0011057005,0.000044843568,0.16472507,0.0045361486,0.0010683773,0.0003863478,0.00005125007,0.12965788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367446,0.000213031,0.000012248266,0.001477433,0.0035399355,0.000008718988,0.000011080955,0.000028832706,0.0010342614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974859,0.00041567333,0.0008175971,0.00019627145,0.00069580483,0.0003887863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730194,0.0010304161,0.0006937171,0.0004337173,0.00035132538,0.00018885914],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011698165,0.00023850666,0.00042005462,0.00014374098,0.0009219524,0.0012616374,0.0033885979,0.000056582543,0.00072573347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014450135,0.000115963034,0.00024783766,0.000258266,0.0005678294,0.0015121105,0.0007234223,0.00057512755,0.00009884039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002386275,0.00021784597,0.00006269639,0.000018084482,0.00019609934,0.0000164957,0.0015459044,0.00014227006,0.000020498284,0.9902394,0.006150125,0.0011519593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008370173,0.0008177466,0.0020293607,0.00030249613,0.000092314134,0.0000137344,0.0018468746,0.00006050254,0.0006768992,0.832651,0.16041937,0.00025264392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033404285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000337445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2952501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004407845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084982355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388932170","doi":"10.1017/pli.2023.35","title":"Edward Said and Philosophy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Direct and indirect realism; Ignorance; Ideology; Philosophy; Marxist philosophy; Realism; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0531842956303757,"score_gpt":0.2766983692449525,"score_spread":0.2235140736145768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388932170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9122336,0.0024846746,0.000005039142,0.057693213,0.005117983,0.0002069631,0.00017125443,0.00008135555,0.022005897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791748,0.00025122016,0.000014957918,0.0043116924,0.014379118,0.0000038379485,0.000014320563,0.000026651627,0.0018234366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832124,0.0002051924,0.00058116403,0.00015069768,0.00037410366,0.00036759546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988014,0.00040370342,0.00022353737,0.00020078287,0.0001542234,0.00021633245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005715407,0.0002014184,0.00034156427,0.00017583772,0.00034023295,0.00019814668,0.00035967483,0.000062635976,0.00020301034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008183315,0.000121221994,0.0002268222,0.00012241099,0.000753192,0.00042574745,0.00015492665,0.00044716394,0.00019042869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048100692,0.00011960258,0.00026040958,0.00007972199,0.00016652072,0.00029434852,0.019561699,0.000002029948,0.000116121686,0.940335,0.033630606,0.004952975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009131384,0.0008413323,0.0025859505,0.00019326006,0.000114994546,0.00031710905,0.00039546154,0.00003271076,0.00007061952,0.14175522,0.85250634,0.00027383378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009143091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010763484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81887573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026226575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004366204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49432895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389397078","doi":"10.1017/s0012217323000409","title":"Spinoza's Early Modern Eudaimonism: Corporeal and Intellectual Flourishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Happiness; Intellectualism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Eudaimonia; Hierarchy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06524712954674497,"score_gpt":0.24285655348145302,"score_spread":0.17760942393470805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389397078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89161825,0.00020304578,0.00008924658,0.0031190477,0.0014061519,0.00020382348,0.00025607712,0.00044028118,0.102664076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994742,0.000097629694,0.000013774073,0.0006593843,0.0019156068,0.000013395515,0.00012916821,0.00002533994,0.002403742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892443,0.00005256758,0.00020211082,0.0002530254,0.00018087954,0.00038698217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933547,0.00028002434,0.000042184514,0.00014308523,0.00003837407,0.00016084769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012720506,0.0001571393,0.00019713989,0.00008856863,0.00028245038,0.0002108775,0.00013500925,0.0000662858,0.0003815624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016321313,0.00013085047,0.000079978825,0.000061930295,0.00030461873,0.00014240613,0.00011644855,0.0002177204,0.0006665235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040935556,0.00006469174,0.00035644186,0.000031172858,0.000048909103,0.000060002334,0.026288621,0.0000021481665,0.000043314234,0.94631946,0.013842183,0.01290214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005026606,0.00020038667,0.0016558624,0.000046995534,0.00003791951,0.000007389379,0.00035942942,0.001174183,0.00011890895,0.65541583,0.34008098,0.0003994201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000338298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007350604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3262388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015167181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014088157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391158250","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2024.500101","title":"Poesis, God, and the Connectedness of All Beings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social connectedness; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06555000143239788,"score_gpt":0.29675495564625193,"score_spread":0.23120495421385406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391158250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004077718,0.105908886,0.0017570583,0.12602136,0.02090957,0.0010329481,0.00015904964,0.0016671468,0.73846626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945106,0.0013688968,0.00023681192,0.0013117283,0.0024462347,0.00011647292,0.000018400373,0.000050324143,0.04934508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829996,0.00020259702,0.0005209297,0.00037521753,0.00030036134,0.00030095005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984744,0.0008098944,0.0000803327,0.00028577572,0.00017520676,0.0001743509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031594216,0.00023440602,0.00039707028,0.0002103589,0.00053882616,0.00011263012,0.00020024714,0.00010685125,0.0007749955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025228123,0.0001532532,0.00026392724,0.00019290032,0.00093202456,0.00021384889,0.000065563,0.00041889155,0.00005511309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010927794,0.000101201666,0.0000016785733,0.00008421618,0.00008061605,0.000007997665,0.00852603,2.8522206e-7,0.000086618675,0.9523063,0.038099933,0.00059589924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020754768,0.00011148919,0.0000017142199,0.00005513767,0.00011400022,0.000018315472,0.00013627486,0.000038971444,0.00005669042,0.23212396,0.76698655,0.00014933746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015771502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023874035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94102836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010078542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007184888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84856576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391312761","doi":"10.33137/rr.v41i4.32474","title":"Letters and Papers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.017186248946453344,"score_gpt":0.20901136139119714,"score_spread":0.1918251124447438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391312761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78618973,0.00044192738,0.000002383565,0.004333799,0.00023580602,0.00009530669,0.0000065938307,0.000031776486,0.20866269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974312,0.00015693248,0.000010142203,0.0013513207,0.00022542052,0.0000026029663,0.000010797413,0.000003881161,0.000807696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964213,0.00001095875,0.00009344897,0.00007906581,0.0000693765,0.00010502269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984896,0.00001375793,0.000025343534,0.00005717211,0.000009736568,0.00004503058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000042808504,0.000059601465,0.00007292108,0.000021827134,0.000100449666,0.000050205912,0.000023911232,0.000019252702,0.00027473748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031483082,0.0000378822,0.000016978742,0.000010414831,0.00009879831,0.00023734086,0.000014925814,0.00005453165,0.000083740524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001690454,0.000013207519,0.00051559054,0.00013660091,0.000011945089,5.254057e-7,0.0029223226,7.1598316e-7,0.00073176436,0.9896059,0.00094906363,0.005095458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004090633,0.00006619596,0.0035765162,0.00008688121,0.000010567677,0.000006719113,0.00044173177,0.00012266735,0.00021075823,0.009248549,0.98565304,0.00016727782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011854608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003055646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000626405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014716264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3008183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391635714","doi":"10.4236/ojpp.2024.141010","title":"Protagoras’s Great Speech and the Republic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Politics; The Republic; Affect (linguistics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.06959725330586121,"score_gpt":0.2906074024379836,"score_spread":0.2210101491321224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391635714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009459455,0.0073465086,0.000011665009,0.27082986,0.002315364,0.0007112501,0.000048012524,0.000033299817,0.7092446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877495,0.00019464018,0.000090848975,0.0022150953,0.005654281,0.0000109642615,0.0000022567665,0.000023528246,0.004058857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987184,0.00015553708,0.00045953284,0.00016404687,0.00030653548,0.0001959911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914914,0.0002476986,0.00011576267,0.00018066222,0.00014656542,0.00016017555],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008410132,0.00015352842,0.00032447276,0.00009167756,0.00024557378,0.0014015061,0.0005645894,0.0000368666,0.002682427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009270013,0.00007612881,0.00018958155,0.00006860637,0.0006367664,0.00067642983,0.00020769073,0.0004356512,0.000084018204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018005753,0.00004311334,0.000005903989,0.00004962604,0.0001246303,0.0001050549,0.001455205,1.2641989e-7,0.000002493909,0.9846091,0.0063391197,0.0070855627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054802996,0.00011087321,0.00000763738,0.00013775604,0.000050985203,0.0001761264,0.00005895852,0.000015888856,0.00001537375,0.5413608,0.45744863,0.000068922134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026717624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004206763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020526786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053052558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391837877","doi":"10.33137/wij.v19i2.42669","title":"Buruma, Ian. Spinoza: Freedom’s Messiah. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 2024.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Messiah; Haven; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.032923960932246484,"score_gpt":0.2522276510342824,"score_spread":0.21930369010203593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391837877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48869875,0.015472535,0.00013489233,0.03537476,0.026731191,0.0010947891,0.0006857545,0.00057793985,0.43122938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.797461,0.0008579256,0.00025018613,0.00010362231,0.0076587014,0.00000776255,0.000023950726,0.000071887196,0.19356498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698967,0.0002090269,0.0006200605,0.0004982011,0.0005233486,0.0011597001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838233,0.00016608984,0.00012381191,0.00031525813,0.00007866209,0.00093383505],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006227525,0.0004013304,0.0004924591,0.0002803784,0.00080323336,0.0007340761,0.0006814606,0.000102943384,0.006700257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048980775,0.0003331257,0.00033489027,0.00016399409,0.0004492004,0.0009880929,0.0004241465,0.0014891588,0.0003628652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005664889,0.0012454223,0.0010936862,0.0003964816,0.0005280376,0.011730413,0.112005316,0.00024176105,0.00005085687,0.7147919,0.15204184,0.0053077843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015510116,0.0003337744,0.0007447103,0.0005668512,0.00007384692,0.0005351379,0.011920358,0.000890546,0.000010762035,0.10878444,0.8740094,0.00057919667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017273612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055982397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059437315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031131264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392154107","doi":"10.1086/729279","title":"Educating the Body Politic: How Hobbes’s Civil Science Strengthens and Constrains the Sovereign","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polity","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Body politic; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04647678468135601,"score_gpt":0.2745181958842246,"score_spread":0.22804141120286858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392154107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15981479,0.00127149,0.0000060589296,0.096865825,0.001531985,0.00027322196,0.0003617025,0.00013848812,0.73973644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270076,0.000031041152,0.000005822362,0.002323035,0.002515392,0.000014236717,0.0000039360716,0.000012081683,0.002393671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851197,0.000102426704,0.00016544064,0.00031227295,0.00031708175,0.0005907842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872655,0.00065153994,0.000030901356,0.0003264508,0.00006930907,0.00019523823],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005362431,0.00016642812,0.00013729748,0.000042933243,0.0011963266,0.0011526631,0.00035571883,0.000028869032,0.0007935311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024549285,0.00008108445,0.00009147049,0.00008794616,0.0042241835,0.00022220462,0.00015857312,0.00035704445,0.000053102478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015132666,0.000034546127,0.00007345199,0.00003300615,0.000019613697,0.0000017275647,0.005180684,4.8462077e-8,0.000015207064,0.99237174,0.0010659673,0.0012024933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007894523,0.000037569607,0.001618265,0.000059485385,0.00005251319,0.00002767664,0.0052542128,0.0002810838,0.00010056175,0.7435629,0.24874623,0.00018060765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044352893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000089305926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.832886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005590847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019946892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392550676","doi":"10.1080/01440357.2023.2274793","title":"Taking authorial liberties: Thomas Hobbes on the occasion of <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prose Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Law; Literature; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Art; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.19644858442083438,"score_gpt":0.30777474386968473,"score_spread":0.11132615944885035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392550676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6729012,0.01596265,0.0000022779589,0.037188545,0.00935448,0.0012236207,0.00053935853,0.0002404933,0.26258737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139124,0.00012534455,0.000007720079,0.0010568546,0.001879933,0.00014829176,0.000005025522,0.000015811587,0.0053697573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986749,0.00018814052,0.00028376913,0.00019985384,0.00039996122,0.0002533232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900013,0.0005472704,0.00014525335,0.00019805587,0.0000756783,0.000033602424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033125616,0.00015763074,0.00026210403,0.000040557195,0.0011764321,0.000036890517,0.00021783944,0.000016338327,0.00094371004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027163667,0.000090200236,0.00014559751,0.00005710586,0.00042308142,0.0000567756,0.0003680344,0.00025269957,0.00002378442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011844565,0.00017917821,0.000035011446,0.000052810858,0.00011172221,0.0000025169827,0.038941976,0.000004698078,0.000047424,0.9524756,0.0074138385,0.00061677524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028637846,0.00053652126,0.00005626489,0.00006693013,0.000055093005,0.0000015016276,0.011136315,0.000010599767,0.0005818256,0.18028308,0.8068115,0.00017396925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002374094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009896846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7993977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034433022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012774013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393010428","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0534","title":"John Milton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046625814904987045,"score_gpt":0.260307133413318,"score_spread":0.21368131850833097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393010428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032165743,0.036816135,0.0000046936725,0.0024949564,0.0032638493,0.0001858865,0.00037748227,0.00014099671,0.9563943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19255063,0.21398577,0.00003384728,0.001613255,0.01975149,0.00008664946,0.0028058228,0.00011014833,0.56906235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874014,0.000036103796,0.00037439735,0.00026759694,0.0002837296,0.00029803338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949074,0.000032168697,0.00010425883,0.00018863379,0.0000620256,0.00012219923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000092755356,0.00028064492,0.0003260513,0.00013409343,0.0002432465,0.00027039347,0.000122843,0.0002367724,0.0008070093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013274853,0.0001746126,0.00013199076,0.000042170865,0.00022740324,0.0002876814,0.00007425084,0.00053778314,0.0009020356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011603824,0.000025975523,7.504707e-7,0.001721835,0.000054802756,0.0000050420504,0.0014893617,7.482684e-8,1.529859e-7,0.51074845,0.46245024,0.023491677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010871478,0.00005415245,0.000006025083,0.0014531652,0.000075163465,0.000008366372,0.00010485738,0.000035210804,0.000009457127,0.056300126,0.9415943,0.00025044763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048431313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022696066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47914407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058608322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000334337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393940414","doi":"10.1515/9781580468909","title":"The Philosopher's English King","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Boydell and Brewer eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Literature; Classics; Art","score_opus":0.052157732735028065,"score_gpt":0.22520041029775065,"score_spread":0.17304267756272257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393940414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030775926,0.003558095,0.0000012727959,0.0008383627,0.0027016075,0.00029916267,0.00013888355,0.00013993194,0.9922919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009119287,0.00007956242,0.0000065852464,0.0020217695,0.01850967,0.000016904181,0.00005929948,0.00008065386,0.97010624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979505,0.00005954789,0.00047216768,0.00043384248,0.00051831186,0.00056561496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983848,0.00031103397,0.00015620496,0.00040939637,0.00038423084,0.00035435194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043031064,0.00046063642,0.00042254644,0.00005948157,0.0006804441,0.0004747893,0.0003646226,0.00028075938,0.00033456797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005337773,0.00028500933,0.00022046614,0.0000071319246,0.000997759,0.00006125249,0.00023402915,0.00074211654,0.00018535525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041912164,0.000016290975,5.392534e-7,0.00004725273,0.000087418826,0.000017996896,0.0023809096,2.629782e-8,1.7302463e-7,0.88643306,0.10428995,0.006684466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018146119,0.00005374217,4.4488155e-7,0.000079552556,0.000062407846,0.0000035569858,0.000108053806,0.0000020493605,0.00000182939,0.42514783,0.5741148,0.0002442797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026462512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096706695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46982485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000732374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014475775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394724854","doi":"10.1017/s0075435824000157","title":"NATHAN GILBERT, MARGARET GRAVER &amp; SEAN McCONNELL (EDS), POWER AND PERSUASION IN CICERO'S PHILOSOPHY. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2023. Pp. ix + 268. <scp>isbn</scp> 9781009170338 (hbk), £85.00; 9781009170352 (ebook).","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Roman Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Cicero; Philosophy; Classics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0676942391168002,"score_gpt":0.25311557619743724,"score_spread":0.18542133708063704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394724854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6006962,0.2762976,0.000010073845,0.012241853,0.001947763,0.0005539368,0.00025865232,0.00009483853,0.10789911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265318,0.02392912,0.000025683437,0.00052661437,0.0017940195,0.0000014596382,0.000008822235,0.000052671065,0.04712979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975217,0.00036678172,0.0006056652,0.0003976901,0.0005281204,0.0005800654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979389,0.0009830091,0.0002399339,0.0002870338,0.0001879825,0.0003631721],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062885147,0.00048611543,0.0007379336,0.00022517539,0.000578444,0.0002129327,0.00039421115,0.00012064646,0.000057745743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016941925,0.000328101,0.00024818679,0.00013861709,0.0010387641,0.00044082766,0.0004470728,0.00087342295,0.00003609896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002910467,0.00019746574,0.00033530733,0.0003841592,0.0010490835,0.00030863815,0.022984937,0.0000043953364,0.00008542078,0.6557421,0.31816688,0.00045056475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012051997,0.00046671033,0.0018215808,0.0007757229,0.00043635187,0.00018633524,0.008590508,0.000030400115,0.00003489963,0.0109332185,0.975248,0.00027111996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054205925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024434304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65708107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012411483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006975254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396241044","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.45","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Jewish Questions of Modern Natural Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Toleration; Judaism; Natural law; Enlightenment; Haskalah; Natural (archaeology); Law; Modernity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Jewish studies","score_opus":0.0227630601117135,"score_gpt":0.25606759601170487,"score_spread":0.23330453589999137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396241044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13824788,0.3670447,0.00009481869,0.06523242,0.0044199135,0.000284844,0.00008261016,0.00006081924,0.42453203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947875,0.0027949295,0.000020067668,0.0010685696,0.0008124937,6.3338166e-7,9.594696e-7,0.000005817404,0.0005089965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993953,0.00005104266,0.00025797146,0.000062903164,0.0001439331,0.00008880927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995686,0.00019238038,0.000060608763,0.000048093436,0.00007434603,0.00005598783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017307815,0.00007216128,0.00016772597,0.000025554724,0.00014392643,0.00011603267,0.000054388074,0.000030949774,0.000018088103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012013135,0.000034429755,0.00010008044,0.00001358398,0.0006175717,0.00015095044,0.000025177755,0.0002178052,0.0000012240325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187732,0.000022813027,0.0000011830355,0.000050793173,0.000058966405,0.000009243578,0.0014329256,0.0000013056396,0.000034971297,0.99690753,0.0006766008,0.00074177847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029790946,0.000074242795,0.000004059806,0.00017969815,0.000078736586,0.000081047925,0.000031648477,0.00021666122,0.000057053527,0.7552377,0.24369927,0.000041950087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104174214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039862036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85653967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006307391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009305047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22754686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396729275","doi":"10.1515/9782760638280-004","title":"L’objection leibnizienne au conventionnalisme de Hobbes","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.027559877083749938,"score_gpt":0.20645855325122706,"score_spread":0.17889867616747712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396729275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010978624,0.0069222767,0.0003496695,0.0033299513,0.0010005949,0.00043151664,0.0011823331,0.0001824553,0.9756226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58132136,0.00205865,0.00012476846,0.00048811425,0.0034326457,0.000013923418,0.00019735005,0.00011656629,0.41224664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711335,0.00020009554,0.00047168293,0.00065713923,0.00039277197,0.0011649424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976687,0.00027612122,0.00046247474,0.00069131417,0.00021200789,0.0006893878],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002537383,0.0007388143,0.0006913698,0.00018120003,0.003352785,0.00035530352,0.0007772827,0.0008032016,0.008972982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061009094,0.0007834424,0.00078951946,0.0000064170695,0.0016748538,0.00020701061,0.00056760473,0.0009469254,0.00036624435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004630517,0.00012145248,0.00037008722,0.00042476915,0.0006027135,0.000726473,0.004287914,0.00003203337,0.0001407027,0.9676486,0.0032922425,0.021889916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008864921,0.0002379208,0.0008596679,0.0006616625,0.0008148545,0.00019197338,0.00033911705,0.00015406802,0.00039383813,0.17940174,0.8153705,0.00068816985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05324196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02800841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81207824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017400831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018688334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396741350","doi":"10.1515/9782760638280-012","title":"Leibniz et la méthode de Hobbes au fondement de la philosophie naturelle","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.03255572491839458,"score_gpt":0.23684899720200897,"score_spread":0.20429327228361438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396741350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036165742,0.012099009,0.00051618647,0.0055222656,0.0003581907,0.00045761463,0.0009565241,0.00018292638,0.9762907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8004998,0.0061221495,0.0015460703,0.0023044809,0.0033533683,0.000029139337,0.00015244525,0.0002457691,0.1857468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959868,0.0008235894,0.00049173523,0.0007886344,0.0005278069,0.0013814281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963489,0.0013747416,0.00042701195,0.0008587945,0.00013984881,0.0008507018],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007012907,0.0009913029,0.0008614969,0.00019834987,0.002474194,0.00045793218,0.0012331995,0.0014118853,0.0027987869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011767809,0.0010096444,0.0008024288,0.000008340157,0.0022996408,0.00017649688,0.00108355,0.0020454708,0.00015208396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005270061,0.00021904851,0.0003634911,0.00045780154,0.00079913344,0.002113601,0.0045960196,0.00010453245,0.00016990612,0.9752745,0.0032367737,0.012138186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008912358,0.00014486113,0.0004083321,0.0005597373,0.0006510401,0.0002053025,0.00015364033,0.00009650928,0.00025755502,0.3927124,0.60327375,0.0006456572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01446469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056837704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7968832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015364258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041071628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399493231","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55920-4_5","title":"The “Theoretical Man of Morality” in The Birth of Tragedy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Morality; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.04415969365456428,"score_gpt":0.2472969709726555,"score_spread":0.20313727731809123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399493231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022725709,0.0008851714,7.1895136e-7,0.01123785,0.00033924356,0.0002228133,0.00022533332,0.000017305656,0.9868443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5736575,0.00014977268,0.0000023250084,0.00053213397,0.0005514106,0.000005849889,0.000011438215,0.000022001808,0.42506754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862456,0.00005427758,0.00054667733,0.00018673562,0.00038191836,0.000205805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888235,0.000583956,0.00007541327,0.00036416907,0.00004996381,0.00004414793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003791797,0.00021399808,0.00034242737,0.00005855202,0.00008380548,0.000061154125,0.00042259615,0.000114639326,0.008237382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020391275,0.000091464266,0.00031922705,0.000013599233,0.0023207313,0.00002206606,0.00007725206,0.0005225158,0.000113777816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026107607,0.000043887034,6.196586e-7,0.00014392321,0.00005845654,0.000009529453,0.0012898197,7.2551984e-8,3.7523296e-7,0.99677706,0.0013341599,0.00031596678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004645331,0.00005534715,0.0000019009751,0.00008058769,0.000034943743,0.0000012183734,0.00017164861,0.0000045471666,0.0000055351534,0.54308087,0.45645228,0.000064654945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038661976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010095255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5734303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011106842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017473683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399739659","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2024.2368311","title":"The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Culmination; German idealism; Idealism; German; Philosophy; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Physics","score_opus":0.031253599767993905,"score_gpt":0.25933258614796,"score_spread":0.2280789863799661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399739659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013137971,0.010664223,0.000011316814,0.1034516,0.0011303445,0.0002660212,0.00003754717,0.000101008234,0.87119997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870564,0.0005261433,0.0000018665723,0.0014298774,0.0033500567,0.0000058890196,0.0000052797477,0.000026614836,0.0059486525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998532,0.0006125849,0.00028384564,0.00015557394,0.00021612822,0.00019986152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987622,0.00075934076,0.000053437547,0.00032752217,0.00004937846,0.000048143072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097275106,0.0001366438,0.00013120924,0.000021915766,0.0006639873,0.0005527156,0.0003923985,0.000011407362,0.00016206063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005576185,0.000051882038,0.00013283655,0.000052462958,0.0016367035,0.000113937065,0.00016547115,0.00024822057,0.00023321016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028207154,0.00000923205,4.4116442e-7,0.000030697367,0.00005285258,0.000008458752,0.0069805672,4.2348952e-7,0.0000040842724,0.9842931,0.0037845646,0.004807384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020281559,0.000020684483,0.000062711086,0.000047768724,0.00004235176,0.000007323397,0.000196669,0.000078457764,0.000012250647,0.3790094,0.62025523,0.000064331456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037772632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005934135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97556764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006710524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008063937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60305023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399843194","doi":"10.1515/9782763714707-013","title":"Rendre Justice à Bayle : À PROPOS de la Tolérance et du Droit","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02865870682759299,"score_gpt":0.2534573641664117,"score_spread":0.22479865733881868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399843194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023819925,0.0016868918,0.000091939466,0.016309349,0.0011315708,0.00040719568,0.0007039526,0.00017422682,0.9792567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118970424,0.0065391744,0.0003299271,0.008566048,0.007341646,0.000027886575,0.00012945684,0.00014272281,0.8579527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971499,0.00021923866,0.0006758188,0.0006728901,0.00046875273,0.00081343617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797225,0.0007923257,0.00014274525,0.00047493327,0.00011989311,0.0004978824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003433625,0.0007011533,0.00067717896,0.00009059783,0.000664271,0.0003354754,0.00043619363,0.000615571,0.13004805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006646487,0.0006166936,0.0005006209,0.000020602729,0.00179227,0.00020924753,0.00012250917,0.0011494118,0.0044833696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009636977,0.00029216637,0.000006439363,0.00041235297,0.0001506589,0.00023322698,0.000732838,0.000007837684,0.0000024477486,0.9883195,0.006809996,0.002936158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029426377,0.00012432183,0.000021346148,0.00034225034,0.0003260389,0.000080920516,0.000045525438,0.00004735449,0.000008715093,0.43319097,0.56508476,0.00043356317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047965779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010729386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55827475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014290008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012560785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400397984","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55064-5_14","title":"“I think h’as knocked his brains out”: Unhealthy Imagination in The Atheist’s Tragedy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.07134318961410777,"score_gpt":0.28157345115803445,"score_spread":0.21023026154392668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400397984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042566684,0.0016518438,0.0000029575417,0.06459498,0.0015300189,0.0005094209,0.00022567368,0.00015683238,0.9312857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048528872,0.00029883417,0.000006658776,0.014105048,0.003315157,0.000019063542,0.00019539299,0.00007430889,0.93345666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979835,0.00006553252,0.0005498162,0.00048279454,0.0005110117,0.00040733366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896103,0.00033963716,0.000089725414,0.00040714355,0.00007784158,0.00012465051],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036415693,0.00044169487,0.0004081328,0.0001918409,0.00024220867,0.0003221437,0.0004265534,0.00022252007,0.016247623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003086351,0.0002644167,0.0003454933,0.000018102688,0.0004400242,0.00012837685,0.000075655094,0.0011479348,0.0046660774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015322967,0.000065779954,1.3753147e-7,0.00011173231,0.000046421836,0.00005654995,0.019459847,6.676863e-8,2.578551e-7,0.9622664,0.016669728,0.0013077653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106115665,0.00006282047,0.0000014079205,0.00008625379,0.00004247889,0.000004629378,0.00028713167,0.00000950522,6.1000185e-7,0.49270824,0.5065135,0.00017731928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021854564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090179883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4898438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012911271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000656382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400398043","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55064-5_15","title":"From the Image of Christ to the Imagining of the Sovereign: Donne, Hobbes, and the Eclipse of Participation and Transformation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Eclipse; Transformation (genetics); Sovereignty; Image (mathematics); Art; Philosophy; Theology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Computer science; Physics; Astronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.031789632431623444,"score_gpt":0.24001443114734536,"score_spread":0.20822479871572191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400398043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004948592,0.00220043,0.000027307946,0.028674513,0.0003822663,0.0006660855,0.0010121325,0.000010752767,0.9620779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798763,0.0003162168,0.00001041313,0.0007451388,0.001059093,0.000013987308,0.000020356654,0.000016829628,0.01794167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901175,0.000055418175,0.0004429671,0.00013216249,0.00025145346,0.000106252475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989213,0.0005565918,0.00014450985,0.00026787102,0.00007888486,0.00003084265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026252886,0.0001611392,0.00026895615,0.00001967452,0.00015376796,0.00007399249,0.00019943279,0.000050969855,0.000959886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002898346,0.000056307934,0.0001522455,0.000014289504,0.001135816,0.00007620086,0.00009443111,0.00022416328,0.000008256575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063139305,0.000009833472,0.0000013448484,0.000079488906,0.00007671624,1.0942299e-7,0.019919481,7.404713e-7,0.000010252272,0.9783548,0.0007320004,0.0007521023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032584654,0.000041046813,0.000042959935,0.00031406738,0.0003317312,6.415452e-7,0.0018180673,0.00014723404,0.00019636546,0.84887266,0.1478197,0.000089703906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054709305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023550176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005832173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012873752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400507784","doi":"10.59123/passion.v2i1.16829","title":"Locke, Anger and the State","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Passion Journal of the European Philosophical Society for the Study of Emotions","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keio University; York University","keywords":"Anger; State (computer science); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law and economics; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.050142575376331065,"score_gpt":0.2665976385428139,"score_spread":0.2164550631664828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400507784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14839607,0.01014531,0.00048877776,0.8048282,0.0068341345,0.0018522363,0.00025598862,0.0000874883,0.027111784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940424,0.00028890697,0.000013660831,0.0008966473,0.0032076344,0.0000059384697,7.066197e-7,0.000031599324,0.0015125067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820185,0.00046543905,0.00056974485,0.00015388952,0.0004114078,0.00019769414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817127,0.0011407518,0.00016246903,0.00025123538,0.00017649273,0.000097754884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016555464,0.00016705567,0.0002513243,0.000026408241,0.00089580624,0.00021013836,0.0005206317,0.00002259663,0.00008201467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015774227,0.00005917914,0.0010450727,0.0001098249,0.0011107768,0.00009606135,0.0002540146,0.0006484702,0.000014755216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015793042,0.00063701713,0.000008384979,0.00013299035,0.0013860461,0.0000066701737,0.031056935,0.000038315226,0.000022492864,0.93561864,0.026745522,0.0041890563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001251557,0.0003986461,0.00034146168,0.00029857515,0.00072746555,0.000027009826,0.0024060616,0.00058453495,0.0000061839273,0.8286068,0.16523226,0.000119467106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006054694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020651469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8456463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001507513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018676286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6889908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400686758","doi":"10.21827/jss.3.1.41848","title":"Spinoza and Spinozism in Twenty-First Century Anglophone Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Spinoza Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0672691735678386,"score_gpt":0.2953752654192147,"score_spread":0.22810609185137612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400686758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56759274,0.35411072,0.000004390244,0.047072936,0.0095187435,0.00033844737,0.00006522108,0.00009422855,0.021202566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971013,0.022819538,0.000068487396,0.0008913797,0.0048168236,0.0000062170093,0.0000017172101,0.000028957375,0.00035384513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801004,0.00005436948,0.00083417044,0.00026916093,0.00041412908,0.00041814218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999143,0.00019115518,0.00015866598,0.00013635207,0.00018405124,0.0001867678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035946173,0.00030237925,0.00064157293,0.0003949771,0.00021927923,0.00018766576,0.00019247038,0.000071485905,0.00031967286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011881822,0.00021102003,0.00025223638,0.00017029585,0.00059042824,0.00044668285,0.00015097015,0.0005561257,0.000054932614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001377803,0.00039904806,0.0010632297,0.0011728276,0.00075770094,0.0010013231,0.019268632,0.0000044760964,0.00004629756,0.9606673,0.00847184,0.007009527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011682245,0.00087096024,0.0028205924,0.0028612239,0.0001898663,0.00017143619,0.0036487353,0.000033628246,0.000056288518,0.24665132,0.74104506,0.00048265405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002320748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031414933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7325732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011074875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035342895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8605147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400768650","doi":"10.3998/ergo.6156","title":"Healthy and Happy Natural Being: Spinoza and Epicurus Contra the Stoics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epicureanism; Pleasure; Happiness; Hedonism; Realm; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Soul; Aesthetics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; History; Psychotherapist; Political science","score_opus":0.11626775954345157,"score_gpt":0.3860840013377269,"score_spread":0.2698162417942753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400768650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6422663,0.04585502,0.00002760157,0.21730208,0.006915917,0.00092526886,0.00014146882,0.00007756249,0.0864888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877996,0.00086442736,0.000042994758,0.0058361664,0.0050684726,0.0000048290076,0.0000045919633,0.000027528862,0.00035141833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984134,0.00016992753,0.00054496666,0.0002526348,0.0003235667,0.00029549756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988488,0.00033182447,0.0001686471,0.00018274035,0.00014670099,0.00032131842],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005362543,0.00022620038,0.00038675725,0.000121428246,0.0005150679,0.003557623,0.0010503718,0.00005457765,0.0004203169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007376055,0.00012966112,0.00010128879,0.00007507372,0.00054466334,0.0025317261,0.0004504778,0.0007068931,0.00000967123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023518306,0.000093579896,0.00009183189,0.0000916942,0.00011664632,0.00008308435,0.0020359443,6.647807e-7,0.0000093802955,0.9909251,0.0014663718,0.0048505743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005513559,0.00058737764,0.0005879793,0.00027897296,0.000087806555,0.00016085796,0.00017211144,0.00013266789,0.000017134407,0.7825894,0.21462965,0.00020471717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075321295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030231657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34553328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030855856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007384518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99747676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402217689","doi":"10.7202/1112014ar","title":"Christopher Martin, \"Spinoza's Argument for Substance Monism: Why There Is Only One Thing\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.10423878512950345,"score_gpt":0.30377479423191883,"score_spread":0.19953600910241537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402217689","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090998725,0.66837656,0.000042933978,0.1857035,0.0013819169,0.0017304672,0.00031238614,0.000220269,0.14132199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70765764,0.16008222,0.00035834816,0.113402836,0.008732198,0.0010633238,0.0001580595,0.00021898538,0.008326387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770087,0.00010196215,0.00073104753,0.0005720961,0.00037281346,0.00052122073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904346,0.00017862055,0.000090878784,0.00043105902,0.000093528,0.00016245387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039349857,0.00035863728,0.00063376274,0.00007365395,0.00016810765,0.00017574601,0.0003448679,0.0000792487,0.0050424254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044101776,0.00027986456,0.00044409969,0.00013535429,0.00019992229,0.00024141597,0.000048077847,0.00037682828,0.00066562096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001932819,0.00023110639,0.000018375165,0.0073242993,0.000076793505,0.000019939756,0.00093249796,2.1786208e-7,0.000002972269,0.96394837,0.023333633,0.004092479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015867739,0.000072583636,0.000008521867,0.0065862187,0.00008121961,0.000002625112,0.000010461895,0.000026335976,0.000011597405,0.39912197,0.59368914,0.00023065589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037409496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024090803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70674765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009314676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004106686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403582153","doi":"10.1080/24740500.2024.2364400","title":"Spinoza, Poetry, and Human Bondage","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Philosophical Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08730147598389335,"score_gpt":0.32501422954412346,"score_spread":0.2377127535602301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403582153","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02061101,0.019410856,0.0000015171308,0.563855,0.0009563861,0.0014294796,0.0002631948,0.0011275937,0.39234495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723375,0.00905053,0.0000146082575,0.0089797,0.0026242416,0.000058253427,0.00013844797,0.000057256388,0.006739504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975117,0.00013345583,0.000646236,0.00056323427,0.0004410945,0.00070427236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870604,0.00012795266,0.00010027657,0.00044971102,0.00006781219,0.0005481975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035356532,0.0003784741,0.00064098596,0.00012004049,0.00043814062,0.00013354808,0.00032937797,0.00012345467,0.0043912465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015396,0.0002994422,0.00027666887,0.00023525252,0.00072626,0.00020336169,0.00018139908,0.0005460449,0.0025477451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038538824,0.00007439694,0.0000667638,0.0012339151,0.000034831977,0.00007388912,0.000102651145,3.0106115e-8,0.000015179924,0.98315316,0.013152859,0.002088437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002078619,0.00012017742,0.00059723645,0.0011652879,0.000082418184,0.000018302342,0.000015798709,0.0000017278114,0.000006062705,0.46547902,0.53202343,0.00028270463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002556868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006438282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95172644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024606421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018005514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404042100","doi":"10.1515/humaff-2024-0049","title":"Collingwood on Spinoza and the Social-Political Role of Art","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Affairs","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.03258392775982888,"score_gpt":0.27151740316125067,"score_spread":0.2389334754014218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404042100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046907973,0.0007390501,0.0000013694674,0.00959915,0.0003404234,0.00019780512,0.00008088505,0.00010446823,0.9420289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938117,0.000009083883,0.0000028395862,0.00044449087,0.0015742817,0.000014473471,0.000010625633,0.00001801198,0.0041144467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902624,0.00007127738,0.00022776925,0.00018621015,0.00020542348,0.00028306307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.00023162387,0.000023367005,0.00011808119,0.000029357894,0.00008669494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015049885,0.00013143983,0.00021412427,0.000049959344,0.0003217291,0.00014403244,0.000114216506,0.000046768564,0.0016139265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021631166,0.00007976717,0.00014879942,0.000029260143,0.001216233,0.00005029806,0.000047144968,0.00021069594,0.0002339697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031320273,0.00006490355,0.000003443552,0.000056543016,0.000045707508,0.0000031834836,0.004421984,9.208502e-8,0.000018847159,0.9926712,0.0025600086,0.00012280371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040140218,0.000105963896,0.000042488646,0.00007540316,0.000054562548,0.00000204861,0.004042482,0.00006261303,0.00013621146,0.6890244,0.30593935,0.000113092596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020198813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014316409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94690377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001808695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001251276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404615350","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a944571","title":"Hume on the Rational and Irrational Origins of Religion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13029612158841772,"score_gpt":0.3167380861961961,"score_spread":0.18644196460777837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404615350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36862472,0.035736892,0.000018404902,0.17660943,0.0042037177,0.0006089718,0.00045256448,0.00023571993,0.41350958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935941,0.0005106437,0.000007682064,0.0009424865,0.0011909645,0.000016696886,0.000008773751,0.0000058834776,0.0037227569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994442,0.000029103641,0.0001445905,0.000118821896,0.00017119756,0.0000921286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941015,0.0004260533,0.000017175023,0.00006298335,0.000062928455,0.000020689808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000094753486,0.00008151552,0.00010422501,0.000030268971,0.00023737142,0.000059003425,0.000043239837,0.000014418252,0.00048917293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004351726,0.0000434641,0.00005075986,0.000022566954,0.00042887303,0.00006313533,0.000032297034,0.000087821885,0.000076704324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008869763,0.000022633983,0.00001281614,0.000040037885,0.00008808236,0.0000014394357,0.002394442,6.4628756e-7,0.000013414181,0.9748038,0.022477694,0.0001361258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045664103,0.000064242195,0.00009926696,0.00006610889,0.000018728077,9.1961283e-7,0.0003060786,0.000019554915,0.000059730133,0.3363639,0.6629057,0.00005009064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015912106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027246244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.640428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021119527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011961119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5356101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404855173","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-69929-0","title":"Rousseau and the Limits of the Liberal International Order","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03991521069858822,"score_gpt":0.2479019723488227,"score_spread":0.20798676165023447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404855173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037536203,0.0011534817,7.5079924e-7,0.03289718,0.0023069987,0.00017506238,0.00014861596,0.000025189174,0.96325517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009872069,0.00016479373,0.0000040457608,0.0031503532,0.0030572673,0.0000086085165,0.00002287533,0.000020915513,0.9836991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918336,0.000037791844,0.0002320489,0.00015805967,0.00026955424,0.00011920978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.00023800477,0.00005499926,0.0001778466,0.00008723793,0.000035411522],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000089684174,0.00015678159,0.0002002496,0.000027369166,0.000098178236,0.00013640602,0.00031656545,0.00007785158,0.0049147597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031965297,0.000061439474,0.00018838202,0.000011975173,0.0009560767,0.00003741882,0.0002003647,0.00036928724,0.000112809656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019273446,0.000013902738,6.910263e-7,0.00004068522,0.00012978353,8.9995046e-7,0.0008626088,1.3202917e-7,6.677121e-8,0.87946856,0.11917746,0.00028595698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013529962,0.0000074747495,0.000002152317,0.00006825529,0.000052200037,0.0000019533077,0.000016974358,0.000017871587,0.000001173149,0.4359461,0.5636992,0.000051387604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026587019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006067681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4445217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019380988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056769604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99599487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405899000","doi":"","title":"« L’héritage cartésien de Spinoza en question »","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cart; Humanities; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.02341431472140904,"score_gpt":0.25550874198116597,"score_spread":0.23209442725975693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405899000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07181738,0.0057579954,0.0037183594,0.21525694,0.0014519587,0.00035907526,0.00031927816,0.00017826358,0.70114076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8093055,0.0015744837,0.0027147771,0.0004223181,0.0006271931,0.000026367194,0.000115535404,0.000048124777,0.18516573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930113,0.0048429407,0.00048571176,0.0005546767,0.0003784489,0.0007269067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951431,0.0012049983,0.0003541282,0.0018723481,0.0009679338,0.0004574538],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042894846,0.0003395222,0.00034978238,0.0000844086,0.0023170412,0.0014252542,0.001274967,0.00027610705,0.001859176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002565979,0.00035521007,0.0002897867,0.000053567084,0.0013883406,0.00054382253,0.0005372372,0.00059454434,0.00045648759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012140138,0.0005914779,0.00096347113,0.00012341276,0.00005423381,0.000018915955,0.009076578,0.0000016762608,0.00018677299,0.9675624,0.0021401208,0.019268798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067199254,0.0000017656323,0.007970306,0.0017934075,0.000104014944,0.000024824338,0.00024484264,0.0019480723,0.004781802,0.11391086,0.8680648,0.00048331646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008401043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022736918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86592466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019139597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014241303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406098040","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12612","title":"A common measure: Hobbes on the epistemic functions of public reason","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sovereignty; Epistemology; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08143138602242155,"score_gpt":0.2541070526870265,"score_spread":0.17267566666460493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406098040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2507982,0.0035047338,0.00006403347,0.36969817,0.0018341531,0.00034664723,0.00024597993,0.000038822305,0.37346926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948334,0.00002892096,0.0000026362165,0.0016244332,0.0017171187,0.00000478013,0.0000020463506,0.00001545247,0.0017711908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981611,0.0004964482,0.0005694553,0.000105990664,0.00044368047,0.0002233386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981881,0.0006982462,0.000353717,0.00037794004,0.0002971172,0.00008492763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009811028,0.00017320135,0.0003252293,0.000120734425,0.00043818966,0.000088438275,0.000628101,0.000051461833,0.00071889174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022895611,0.000079381614,0.00041467953,0.00012649792,0.0006926203,0.00007916639,0.000057064568,0.0005652556,0.00011237488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013724771,0.00021067564,0.000091511676,0.000023394576,0.00025092403,0.0000021074352,0.0034597327,0.0000035547444,0.000038286867,0.9933457,0.0014045933,0.0010323056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004136002,0.00024223686,0.000054605505,0.00033910017,0.00015464533,0.00001061251,0.003028989,0.000008738335,0.00007806301,0.92378163,0.07179041,0.00009736629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022581666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015664886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7440352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003716569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058003676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7871361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555216","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0013","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Ghost of Spinoza","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.043100008402505746,"score_gpt":0.20154293871263035,"score_spread":0.1584429303101246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005750426,0.00089596614,0.0000016617909,0.0004206217,0.00034469125,0.00024943633,0.00054711325,0.000052614534,0.9974304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0129925525,0.0006287447,0.0000058514916,0.0001489161,0.00044825647,5.823761e-7,0.000016863976,0.000026457155,0.9857318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915016,0.000023485107,0.00018323115,0.00025682946,0.00020655543,0.00017976564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934477,0.00014666963,0.00009974809,0.00025040557,0.00006884182,0.00008955999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000070456255,0.00024750247,0.00036877728,0.0000698834,0.00018999464,0.00006735164,0.00027338375,0.00013492833,0.00034542536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004224437,0.00017113097,0.00023747668,0.0000021875799,0.0015393923,0.000047109384,0.00034337217,0.00036378956,0.0000033999622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001528674,0.000008077454,1.11878904e-7,0.0001660788,0.00023706615,0.000026070358,0.0013714618,1.396488e-7,3.4321775e-7,0.99633956,0.0010243044,0.00067393197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039541707,0.000039215713,2.3249267e-7,0.00015613028,0.00031450915,0.0000023326081,0.00010136081,0.000010080625,0.000008558048,0.23182818,0.76699346,0.00015049036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009656248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022911692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7659692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024337332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000190723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6978519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407705554","doi":"10.5771/9780739135990-361","title":"Appendix M. Glimpses of Leo Strauss, Jacob Klein, and St. John's College (2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; History; Classics; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.035321976879097036,"score_gpt":0.23145519766526235,"score_spread":0.1961332207861653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407705554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006473192,0.0015823495,0.000003130427,0.0010159423,0.0013838359,0.00043850136,0.0037274244,0.000113149115,0.99108833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.072253294,0.0003839213,0.00010315061,0.0011747818,0.004597951,0.000013915437,0.0003188308,0.0001545725,0.9209996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769676,0.000029092185,0.0007062768,0.0005659422,0.00048908225,0.00051286013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985092,0.00019256944,0.0003326756,0.0004951005,0.00015764302,0.00031276172],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015348343,0.0006025018,0.00084292586,0.00018323613,0.00031406418,0.000118304546,0.00033710044,0.0005227957,0.012437246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026767302,0.0005139196,0.00032273424,0.000009164238,0.0013457428,0.00012242587,0.00018954978,0.0010703972,0.0002930868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063703614,0.00005423708,0.0000030608228,0.00022914403,0.00014432888,0.000036775287,0.0004579055,5.7944323e-8,0.000031415937,0.98790276,0.010291322,0.000785276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028500234,0.00016859773,0.000003921527,0.00021794219,0.00010312639,0.000008364145,0.000037138772,0.0000012863377,0.00018205008,0.37202215,0.62660784,0.00036257232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013408293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003639581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6163165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003214678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007405826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408574690","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13057","title":"Parmenides and Dr. Strangelove, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Monism and Accept the World of Relations, at least for the sake of the Good","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.07473006558338527,"score_gpt":0.2790832779192636,"score_spread":0.2043532123358783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408574690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29375243,0.009839608,0.00024252721,0.5343477,0.001535713,0.0013158685,0.00030858902,0.000022646787,0.1586349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875245,0.00012062728,0.000070086266,0.0011464263,0.000752104,0.000002467068,7.329834e-7,0.000017049644,0.010366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987939,0.00028425764,0.00043308365,0.000121176716,0.0002083031,0.00015927794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998624,0.0006656328,0.0002929897,0.00020512198,0.00013884415,0.00007338016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005519026,0.00014059288,0.00023819046,0.000077994366,0.000491552,0.00010234566,0.00035356008,0.000014945383,0.00012588737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017846099,0.000061191095,0.00016774278,0.000099009856,0.000496615,0.00010307558,0.0001653997,0.0002615126,0.0000019663999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005770644,0.00010013726,0.0006883241,0.000114512084,0.00028256892,0.000004467421,0.004748061,0.0000375908,0.00022204529,0.9815005,0.004819973,0.006904775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019289041,0.00056062784,0.020430883,0.00089481997,0.00046907042,0.000020545256,0.001707883,0.000043328117,0.00047551407,0.11867776,0.854568,0.0002226834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021834403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020157258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001480784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022649261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37806702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409312973","doi":"10.3138/ecf.2023-0071","title":"Dialectic of Whimsy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Philosophy; Geology; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018916422396269877,"score_gpt":0.23962540973984467,"score_spread":0.2207089873435748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409312973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06598972,0.0067418963,0.0002438107,0.0024358681,0.008517067,0.00051191245,0.0001178134,0.0002610409,0.91518086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299306,0.001265003,0.000037871203,0.0005042735,0.0010225835,0.000025882326,0.000057942834,0.000017096701,0.004076282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849635,0.00009816933,0.00048254023,0.00030930372,0.00026830658,0.000345303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991892,0.00014702341,0.00011429907,0.00030224572,0.00015059352,0.00009664077],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013226648,0.00021132358,0.00029677717,0.00021283755,0.00027768197,0.0000709393,0.00020085133,0.000095511736,0.0030996392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006285499,0.00017843026,0.00022758046,0.00016430167,0.0002788192,0.00020611312,0.00006587087,0.0002311382,0.00012900578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086328604,0.00042993447,0.00029033693,0.00010324727,0.000089479065,0.0000018272101,0.0007069515,0.0000023344403,0.0001738575,0.97230697,0.023218049,0.0025906693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061673945,0.00011888602,0.0007369613,0.00012401726,0.00010974422,0.0000013587069,0.0002518729,0.000084764324,0.0013447677,0.021664347,0.97474235,0.00020417175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075210686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015195837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072818475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003818218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409982317","doi":"10.1177/14748851251337317","title":"The unbearable lightness of servitude: Étienne de la Boétie and the fragility of freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Philosophy; Lightness; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.011420913250980972,"score_gpt":0.24118129092060284,"score_spread":0.22976037766962187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409982317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2342017,0.0047313473,0.0005168438,0.016380914,0.00080480095,0.00016673308,0.000052710024,0.000015022816,0.7431299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971513,0.00010081575,0.00004078625,0.0006927223,0.0005543928,6.5003076e-7,3.4014298e-7,0.000011492131,0.0014474724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573773,0.0029858798,0.0006470556,0.00009126526,0.00021274411,0.00032534264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950559,0.004149039,0.00018582845,0.00023731061,0.0002216809,0.00015024083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004882503,0.00012349141,0.0003249678,0.000048212798,0.00023004392,0.00007498805,0.00045901956,0.000027598542,0.00016478478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010943504,0.00005879197,0.0002194422,0.000050102004,0.0040775905,0.00006659601,0.00014888927,0.0004129918,0.000003921767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004978973,0.00012659372,0.00005985681,0.00006726777,0.00013155954,0.000010987164,0.0011524976,0.0000029835385,0.000024661744,0.99712265,0.0003213389,0.00048173039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011890163,0.00012889551,0.0020581733,0.00017129749,0.00012491796,0.000017679064,0.0014832565,0.00002367456,0.0002865199,0.9170735,0.07737565,0.000067409805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024463152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016936064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76294965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001931851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005639996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410130677","doi":"10.5117/9789463728799_ch14","title":"Born in Bondage: Slavery, Freedom, and Enlightenment in Spinoza","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.029156413115465143,"score_gpt":0.22717433115239105,"score_spread":0.19801791803692592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410130677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019525805,0.0016938604,0.0000010993647,0.003695088,0.0006259338,0.00033118227,0.0001464335,0.000039112256,0.993272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027971027,0.0007465567,0.000049302205,0.0020942013,0.0009245296,0.00001695368,0.00006404563,0.00003127893,0.9681021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984119,0.000022364778,0.00052042754,0.00045065896,0.00024181361,0.00035282123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941975,0.00012246077,0.000058506037,0.00025121725,0.000030140973,0.000117915515],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011524666,0.00037353885,0.00052947627,0.00028386328,0.00006474252,0.000099645404,0.00016688384,0.00023867124,0.008322781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014945901,0.0002995815,0.00012657663,0.000013580968,0.00030725944,0.00007755856,0.00018650564,0.0005561008,0.00014909593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023017721,0.00006446296,0.000029333536,0.00010018485,0.000027809741,0.00008354605,0.00046730682,1.3208421e-7,3.6172318e-7,0.9902619,0.0069285315,0.0020134181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003548285,0.000046322966,0.00004262536,0.00029503703,0.000018900704,0.000001339919,0.000032338863,0.000011518071,0.0000025257957,0.34720713,0.6517501,0.00023733353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050966284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016055288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6448216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095474476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003942158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412276663","doi":"","title":"The Unlikely Claimant:Sovereignty and Republicanism in Hobbes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05608022653346238,"score_gpt":0.24570492915902634,"score_spread":0.18962470262556397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412276663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2104787,0.0023046979,0.000041471212,0.0068223886,0.00008255943,0.0005001938,0.00008710472,0.000025416724,0.7796575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7306628,0.0004345094,0.000030565967,0.000060555696,0.000052514366,1.0846291e-7,0.000011204746,0.000009309667,0.2687384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723756,0.0009855466,0.00019107948,0.00036198998,0.0006618722,0.00056196685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737513,0.0013815663,0.00013677138,0.00054998003,0.0003314218,0.00022514943],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018919413,0.00016650312,0.00034654367,0.00012566251,0.002189429,0.0000798721,0.0011476214,0.000093702176,0.19397655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015641417,0.00013432938,0.00015359196,0.00024163982,0.0032245163,0.00037467244,0.00093358045,0.00045687554,0.006938565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005102396,0.00011463392,0.000006906377,0.000061727595,0.000083714214,0.000026895128,0.0066387383,0.000003963061,0.000107642765,0.5368687,0.4526448,0.002932059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092472724,0.00023978698,0.0022497824,0.000055203174,0.000033814067,0.0000029341984,0.012826073,0.00022420673,0.00013165249,0.004286075,0.97887087,0.0001549038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017184091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029355646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53258264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012322399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010399339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414609349","doi":"10.5380/dp.v22i1.98420","title":"Racionalismo, ceticismo e a coerência do Commentaire Philosophique de Bayle","year":2025,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"DoisPontos","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.030488771076574956,"score_gpt":0.30232797423036334,"score_spread":0.2718392031537884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414609349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064005665,0.01307176,0.0004249147,0.23270394,0.0052829487,0.001871286,0.0023385282,0.00045191162,0.679849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206512,0.0002875986,0.00003904588,0.03991337,0.0028588397,0.00011074002,0.00015867308,0.000062249215,0.035918258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960346,0.0005486663,0.00090229785,0.00075181975,0.0005435692,0.0012190362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976805,0.000653919,0.00017724895,0.00074496854,0.00022760365,0.00051577826],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005326183,0.00068484683,0.00079942256,0.00026386263,0.000972846,0.00051510736,0.00073791336,0.0004242927,0.009368047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017319524,0.0006352419,0.00058320444,0.000208403,0.00067128113,0.00025243842,0.0003471691,0.00092874595,0.000751025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003688122,0.0010222382,0.00037067215,0.00033274828,0.00033701747,0.00011973266,0.0032565736,0.0000037524608,0.000049945524,0.92851365,0.06427928,0.00134557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013896312,0.00016166587,0.0005319258,0.00059339544,0.0002767211,0.000013625929,0.0007959838,0.00019417878,0.00021908761,0.2860589,0.7092254,0.000539459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029514715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012129279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8566456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004121788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023470022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414753228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2551577","title":"Is Spinoza a dualist?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Dualism; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Ontology; Idiosyncrasy; Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.07921737422259575,"score_gpt":0.27660107335320183,"score_spread":0.19738369913060608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414753228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020608378,0.10794808,0.0010085248,0.07645584,0.042534836,0.0010052356,0.00092304975,0.0001187962,0.7679448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7104777,0.0012035752,0.00026958346,0.024484709,0.009614055,0.00006147551,0.000018831233,0.00006129455,0.25380877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987625,0.00006163332,0.00048129086,0.00017496973,0.00025152255,0.00026810286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.00022983384,0.00017065428,0.00018727363,0.00025432327,0.00010391869],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003222465,0.00014472051,0.00028172074,0.00009271081,0.00062912225,0.00008619487,0.00042794214,0.000056074758,0.0019042973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009019583,0.00012274807,0.00050324656,0.000034986508,0.00061833626,0.0001410553,0.000048351787,0.00035302495,0.000023575498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005910618,0.00016501409,0.0000022609172,0.0000838754,0.000120001794,0.000011135985,0.0009823844,8.7175056e-7,0.00000829335,0.6868086,0.3068428,0.004915676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004666503,0.000054237993,0.000015516956,0.00018842416,0.00007600619,0.000065310254,0.000050690564,0.000022707256,0.000007743359,0.40604293,0.5929269,0.000082847655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012709892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001648835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7084169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019880901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111720605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414755517","doi":"10.26417/zb79g671","title":"How to Read Spinoza Without Pentimento: An Alternative to Strauss","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Judgement; Reading (process); Sympathy; Politics; Reflexive pronoun; Censorship","score_opus":0.189284574453231,"score_gpt":0.4512677063186946,"score_spread":0.2619831318654636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414755517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4474261,0.00016337993,0.000053499778,0.15155669,0.0014944045,0.00021149608,0.0000072764815,0.000007944811,0.3990792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697775,0.000018525985,0.00020331366,0.0014835945,0.0023273504,0.0000016780077,7.282985e-7,0.0000046155455,0.02618265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982787,0.00058978784,0.00018893709,0.00016228166,0.0005284792,0.00025181726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909276,0.000055261982,0.000053876003,0.000055154425,0.00048237306,0.0002605888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002121251,0.000067476285,0.000108192944,0.00030085392,0.0008776447,0.0008571388,0.00038569805,0.00000959327,0.00030463075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001823276,0.000046919573,0.00003861203,0.0002326857,0.0007291347,0.00026748638,0.00009204914,0.00022059694,0.000032911434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038371487,0.00028007015,0.000115021336,0.0000121941675,0.000016350796,0.0000027325345,0.028844899,8.6104205e-7,0.00014024814,0.92174816,0.011994138,0.03680696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016683874,0.00072079175,0.0039307694,0.000105140956,0.000008007484,0.0000028130285,0.034984905,0.0000038747944,0.00009337028,0.021272609,0.9386168,0.00009406632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052185216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018494466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044039552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018576409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8265409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54198990","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v22i2.44219","title":"Human Nature and the Development of Character: The Clash of Descriptive and Normative Elements in John Stuart Mill's Educational Theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Character (mathematics); Mill; Character development; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Geography; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03185774913721692,"score_gpt":0.2966862218726598,"score_spread":0.26482847273544285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54198990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572046,0.0012542298,0.0000042451607,0.019277604,0.0008061451,0.00022358159,0.000038715207,0.0000010624519,0.021189844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546194,0.00005634715,0.00059010996,0.00067148433,0.0017467343,0.00001014011,0.0000077584755,0.0000069812663,0.0014485151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984051,0.00030836268,0.0007292677,0.00009583688,0.0003244357,0.00013699474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780506,0.0010305265,0.0005143638,0.00009412152,0.00049421104,0.000061706574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012394799,0.00012129962,0.00024391177,0.00010898602,0.0003130754,0.000038104958,0.00021432577,0.000046507852,0.0008267272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026506808,0.000062579464,0.00006894497,0.00006551477,0.0012027007,0.00020132594,0.000058512003,0.00038326698,0.0000035481448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001580217,0.0002843907,0.0011927319,0.000026358715,0.00012296053,7.5306644e-8,0.04047002,8.3239755e-8,0.000049597234,0.9561325,0.0011889002,0.00037439176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013636412,0.0001735725,0.1229231,0.00028997494,0.0000754765,0.000018247942,0.010270805,0.0000044624885,0.00048683034,0.75896686,0.10528209,0.00014495732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006607642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005138039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19716562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043109285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023128449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612896012","doi":"10.71781/16366","title":"Droit naturel comme fondement du droit international chez Hobbes","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.07137457986072894,"score_gpt":0.30705109775784306,"score_spread":0.23567651789711414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W612896012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14451693,0.0017967507,0.000008038053,0.010257824,0.008284889,0.0009528462,0.0012935742,0.000008014718,0.83288115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6628054,0.001472155,0.00036933375,0.0014818846,0.0065345108,0.000092243885,0.0077464785,0.00009181296,0.31940624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687403,0.00012192555,0.0008655052,0.0007753633,0.0007349969,0.0006281472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983763,0.00022515234,0.0003529592,0.0003804498,0.00031722974,0.00034789054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025210925,0.0005967716,0.00067762216,0.00014526192,0.0009095701,0.0008599767,0.0015650276,0.0004838926,0.07561312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009205127,0.0005929054,0.00042062736,0.00006716984,0.00046225984,0.0004513148,0.0003398827,0.00096586783,0.00408254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033453177,0.0015997168,0.00021565628,0.00008252382,0.00071216596,0.00015338555,0.013126374,0.0000055892624,0.000037884613,0.95697016,0.010152153,0.016609862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011288171,0.00018651661,0.0006911059,0.00044743269,0.00021097118,0.000031545987,0.0022114923,0.00015413165,0.00068566226,0.04165377,0.95187086,0.00072769506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010224986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075438427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002684107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016378117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621692400","doi":"","title":"Of Philosophers and Kings: Political Philosophy in Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear by Leon Harold Craig (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Literature; Classics; History; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0263860310566658,"score_gpt":0.20624662021497464,"score_spread":0.17986058915830883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621692400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25751606,0.074488595,0.000019127867,0.04512385,0.0003788428,0.0009210226,0.0008082827,0.0001185572,0.6206257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739593,0.0012390158,0.000045236986,0.0005457521,0.00012864746,2.6473603e-7,0.000009466197,0.000010593872,0.00062506314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989087,0.00008806458,0.00024062772,0.000262906,0.0002005675,0.0002991613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994246,0.00009026553,0.000092926384,0.00015105116,0.000052445725,0.0001887174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009449705,0.00016789544,0.00039009383,0.00003655486,0.00009249123,0.000014812159,0.00015658849,0.00007078688,0.0030128187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000125818915,0.00017345106,0.00009232145,0.000018308827,0.00060501485,0.00031915825,0.00003616252,0.00013717177,0.000007748024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006148116,0.00032582047,0.00047091657,0.0007085732,0.000058396992,0.000019246416,0.009775883,5.7157617e-8,0.000081083344,0.98163533,0.002284348,0.0045788884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007652196,0.00600837,0.0041062436,0.004807281,0.00061677856,0.00003431277,0.020703122,0.0006990909,0.00006016819,0.14181753,0.8115069,0.0019879504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00391981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009735868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83981776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059212165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052368523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6910864924","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2008.02775","title":"Forecasting Photovoltaic Power Production using a Deep Learning Sequence to Sequence Model with Attention","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deep learning; Photovoltaic system; Context (archaeology); Mean squared error; Sequence (biology); Time series; Artificial neural network; Baseline (sea); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.32654920202149307,"score_gpt":0.2302686790697529,"score_spread":0.09628052295174017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6910864924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96728194,0.000021532902,0.025962852,0.00043076652,0.00045996817,0.00057292986,0.000049748047,0.00022731745,0.004992929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964031,0.00001271006,0.0007334195,0.0002537639,0.00046549938,0.0000028275115,0.000050580304,0.00004581066,0.002032278],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980054,0.00010998862,0.00023346915,0.0010422169,0.0001578747,0.00045105445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988723,0.000038116865,0.00020607706,0.00032644693,0.00027334865,0.00028372477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012772334,0.00036927836,0.00034193668,0.0001505455,0.00048422677,0.00015470057,0.00033315746,0.0001352169,0.00016168883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088220426,0.00036333993,0.00017095338,0.00018419304,0.00026307537,0.00033292884,0.00042875897,0.00085598696,0.00005330972],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002463732,0.00009444093,0.00045484997,0.00023398103,0.00012157063,0.00021048544,0.0033712483,0.78886384,0.0016062312,0.20466413,0.000020624657,0.000112206304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002327428,0.00015458289,0.000013661085,0.00046819012,0.0001926569,0.000016455064,0.00074786745,0.9282047,0.00010914776,0.068301864,0.0009645181,0.00059359707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002520573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009320537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13934085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029634693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009322896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924400513","doi":"10.15468/dl.ppl2od","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Order (exchange); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04357963022884868,"score_gpt":0.23184672765246955,"score_spread":0.18826709742362088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924400513","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010364925,0.000029811448,3.3356767e-7,0.00064779376,0.0021778927,0.0003143613,0.99199283,0.00007100406,0.004662316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000068415226,0.000044008448,1.679462e-7,0.0021081667,0.000020794132,0.0000027896822,0.99775285,2.0206281e-8,0.00000280167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984103,0.00006481395,0.00041560587,0.00022976557,0.00050322025,0.00037630514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884707,0.00003720082,0.0002087607,0.00046586155,0.00023950786,0.00020159855],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013823812,0.00031831386,0.00033959825,0.00006462928,0.00034141104,0.00030516234,0.0005149651,0.00024816178,0.02572387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008172614,0.00028083092,0.00024800593,0.00006357888,0.00039860827,0.00085693586,0.0002799255,0.00037222236,0.5359369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004808152,0.000065142944,0.000046394278,0.00023193199,0.000041456562,0.0000012866433,0.0001724554,0.000001037007,2.2338775e-9,0.00012539302,0.99900323,0.000263584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002915283,0.000053097552,0.0000052867135,0.00000505115,0.00006596743,0.0000015072983,0.00016337338,7.8938776e-8,3.1431114e-7,0.00004997258,0.99903387,0.00032994992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037209512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014667985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.510213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017641051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000721022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996780073","doi":"","title":"Spinoza and Spinozism in Twenty-First Century Anglo-American Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Metaphysics; Politics; Political philosophy; History of philosophy","score_opus":0.026575595968157017,"score_gpt":0.25208221948797144,"score_spread":0.22550662351981443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996780073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37058038,0.0067572235,0.000009887817,0.12097231,0.006022619,0.0013805636,0.00019620279,0.0010891289,0.4929917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898511,0.0016909065,0.00007919525,0.003955099,0.0032122468,0.00008628398,0.00017606508,0.000092499584,0.00085659773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967992,0.00011931465,0.00070434285,0.0009785412,0.0005566499,0.0008419838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.00029642685,0.00010754041,0.0004123057,0.00008281698,0.00039016438],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028445196,0.00056782126,0.0005546874,0.00048176205,0.00056021905,0.00071979454,0.00034675395,0.0001125569,0.0048871613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009352479,0.00050300616,0.00023163873,0.0004068298,0.0015474699,0.0008906793,0.00014676168,0.0006198291,0.0010522107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005688229,0.00019584446,0.00056711445,0.00023155771,0.00012189344,0.00007205071,0.004401746,0.000003873284,0.00006076379,0.96225107,0.00035374166,0.031683486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072818506,0.00027305057,0.0025610984,0.00037466479,0.000099763725,0.000029715104,0.0008954418,0.00023926503,0.000018559049,0.09981111,0.89416206,0.00080706086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003842452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003792773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89380836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024005485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007154969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015321277","doi":"","title":"Spinoza's Eudaimonism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03499452347170346,"score_gpt":0.25180671168559304,"score_spread":0.2168121882138896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015321277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23278533,0.0014518993,6.657188e-9,0.0002190902,0.009754622,0.0005262116,0.0033249275,0.0006471829,0.75129074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79468536,0.00029474834,0.000036656285,0.0012520405,0.0015564988,0.00015055243,0.0021139954,0.0003379056,0.19957222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505144,0.00023563376,0.0011194431,0.0013710984,0.0010576997,0.0011646545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977129,0.00022545193,0.00028988664,0.00079510774,0.0003439262,0.0006327155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000414176,0.001112014,0.0009756801,0.0004202135,0.0015665357,0.0005281569,0.0008551786,0.0007808839,0.008394883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002513291,0.0009991508,0.0009512637,0.00019373841,0.00024001318,0.0005725938,0.0001868371,0.0027014525,0.010373446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009121067,0.0002337379,4.419274e-7,0.0006874043,0.00031599705,0.00016647173,0.000088493616,5.704855e-7,0.00040580283,0.9737033,0.00015004183,0.024156481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023832309,0.000110514586,0.000013066088,0.0004964772,0.00028786043,0.00000892289,0.0003607088,0.0000036919696,0.0020236408,0.41166797,0.58400875,0.0007800863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033904772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009106038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5838587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003919606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005078403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024827411","doi":"","title":"Supuestos sexistas del carpe diem erótico y réplicas femeninas en la poesía contemporánea","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Nova scotia; Western europe","score_opus":0.017729002930377668,"score_gpt":0.22703012536262357,"score_spread":0.2093011224322459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024827411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8348367,0.0014478109,0.0008846797,0.023226243,0.0004309029,0.000703786,0.00095441926,0.00030961036,0.13720582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98520017,0.0017979225,0.00068159896,0.00079887063,0.000548693,0.0000010711698,0.000055294397,0.00008497808,0.010831431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953876,0.0011604378,0.00056656986,0.00094780786,0.00072358706,0.0012139708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958476,0.0011509252,0.00048947195,0.0007867825,0.00041969545,0.0013055669],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053269195,0.00077037705,0.0010302741,0.0005097321,0.0010604919,0.00023048418,0.0011234665,0.00072291127,0.0011663304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016089596,0.0007435126,0.0007153597,0.000260532,0.0025287122,0.00081118476,0.00059790036,0.0006348507,0.000280383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065498817,0.00042282036,0.0072726654,0.000552228,0.000717482,0.0012094761,0.011069103,0.000013425553,0.00674795,0.96434456,0.004359795,0.0026355055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045685405,0.0008365422,0.0063597215,0.0019393169,0.0010735617,0.00026431898,0.0127217425,0.00025538265,0.0023265285,0.011355489,0.9567333,0.0015655776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018963158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022988573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091085443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047629877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030320098","doi":"","title":"\"Mulâtresses pionnières : trois autrices martiniquaises d’avant la Négritude\"","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Verisimilitude; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.2857083074837273,"score_gpt":0.5351768194994553,"score_spread":0.249468512015728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030320098","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11200473,0.6485609,0.000083108964,0.017953925,0.01098164,0.00084063667,0.0018619688,0.00025249034,0.20746061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8228079,0.13369371,0.00008316452,0.0009612956,0.0057466915,0.000080949496,0.00004661223,0.0001607321,0.03641893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385834,0.0009852077,0.0018502107,0.0009414998,0.001257505,0.0011072131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942353,0.0033603609,0.0005828106,0.0006071499,0.00041241164,0.000801989],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014645021,0.0008396276,0.0014280777,0.0010359893,0.0009151324,0.009982765,0.003032471,0.00032687862,0.12745032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042749787,0.0006848251,0.0008712676,0.00060636835,0.001467492,0.004203998,0.0014490676,0.0013139562,0.00047840885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039075204,0.0021528201,0.010401785,0.0027857306,0.0018074949,0.00087151595,0.0026213792,0.000039481478,0.0012110182,0.63719803,0.31001207,0.030507902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037006036,0.00004566936,0.015340217,0.0036963674,0.0006200473,0.000047248257,0.0002527836,0.00011257767,0.001720407,0.16705872,0.8099794,0.0007565264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019938403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7108032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014539924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026701853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7069012609","doi":"","title":"La lettre perdue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); German; Criticism; Judaism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Christianity","score_opus":0.30395072266549356,"score_gpt":0.5224977041378464,"score_spread":0.2185469814723528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7069012609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5484107,0.0032091108,0.000011455428,0.0021736952,0.00242939,0.00029961226,0.0001699865,0.000073055744,0.443223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907131,0.0009441202,0.000046376586,0.001410313,0.0023816936,0.0000233842,0.000017686687,0.000052910356,0.0044103786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976366,0.00023694767,0.00068054366,0.0003753894,0.0005911875,0.00047932737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801344,0.00052804075,0.00032714556,0.0004642818,0.0002450097,0.0004220912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074753683,0.00032405413,0.0006082532,0.00033284715,0.00045461726,0.0020489532,0.0022161584,0.00014419272,0.12986743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002647126,0.0002520385,0.00030773052,0.00016765133,0.0006291358,0.0015643326,0.0006706875,0.0010514531,0.00019669965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018803871,0.0009875302,0.027145972,0.00014745344,0.00029426123,0.00012036165,0.0018551402,0.0000037897348,0.016035412,0.7786601,0.15603244,0.018529464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034730064,0.000009133392,0.024360145,0.00012217084,0.000061617044,0.000017881566,0.000112965274,0.000010341329,0.00197305,0.146201,0.8264157,0.00036867298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007381544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019234463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6703833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025433927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006784577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071060456","doi":"","title":"Review of \"Bayle calviniste libertin\" by Hubert Bost","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Subject (documents); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.018875111314923275,"score_gpt":0.18871097701962858,"score_spread":0.1698358657047053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071060456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049961726,0.017462892,0.000010220188,0.024098461,0.0009392037,0.0004803921,0.0029077765,0.00021605687,0.94888884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4762509,0.011289714,0.0002313084,0.044961028,0.0015570658,0.0000104817045,0.0021633047,0.00015766818,0.46337855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982787,0.00025372702,0.00032969375,0.00035033855,0.0003888805,0.00039868185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989673,0.00017235083,0.00017049533,0.0003929696,0.00006618777,0.00023072785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014952487,0.0002252967,0.00042473173,0.00008878182,0.0007289885,0.00006349838,0.00065891666,0.00004998026,0.051212355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000385191,0.00022772714,0.00026863132,0.00019200867,0.0005554543,0.00047985744,0.00067699444,0.00038888294,0.00015376708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006896772,0.00022868726,0.00008998812,0.00058872235,0.000058136575,0.000018235945,0.0005188103,4.5972388e-7,0.000004936605,0.75477594,0.24330232,0.00034477763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042128772,0.00017165752,0.00002325172,0.0002742024,0.000089524074,0.000003853605,0.00055201806,0.0000080709715,0.00007424836,0.0070806365,0.9910267,0.00027456085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026338876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000100315165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74772435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007544583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009481833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94965494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099381182","doi":"","title":"D E P E N","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Work (physics); Service (business); Savings account; Income tax; Social security; Tax rate; Tax deferral","score_opus":0.02804076722988872,"score_gpt":0.2269549392315318,"score_spread":0.19891417200164307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099381182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05531108,0.0000059175427,0.0000071158265,0.005146582,0.0012562152,0.000029782239,0.000006506176,0.00008748995,0.93814933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595067,8.28089e-7,0.00007562261,0.0021203656,0.002055952,0.0000027040628,0.000003134333,0.00000491441,0.036229763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996535,0.000005100264,0.00006986166,0.00007414165,0.00006870404,0.00012867525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997607,0.000031677642,0.000006968578,0.000099689,0.000021821186,0.000079175705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000032403284,0.00004808247,0.000048828297,0.000013913796,0.000089541005,0.000050990406,0.000075465534,0.000019248528,0.06237684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016731441,0.000031677373,0.000042388056,0.0000071075838,0.00014158712,0.000056594043,0.000017033304,0.00013730512,0.0017366062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015055751,0.00003213547,0.000023871216,0.0000014682029,0.0000029403368,8.6544065e-7,0.00024094363,3.5633272e-9,0.00015609873,0.99395156,0.0046670754,0.0009215517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049561557,0.000009531276,0.000042269447,5.917124e-7,0.0000021223707,9.739408e-7,0.000029872648,0.0000046214445,0.00025086492,0.2276056,0.77195734,0.00004668117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003099975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011040983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90419567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000011977933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034889608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100510235","doi":"","title":"Canadian Political Science Association","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029241134369332827,"score_gpt":0.2591523115042953,"score_spread":0.22991117713496248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100510235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038934167,0.000007621513,0.000014380105,0.01794929,0.0007293688,0.000050551927,0.000017782872,0.00005007769,0.94224674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97086984,3.8222737e-7,0.000034776018,0.006632261,0.0013167799,8.485128e-7,0.0000036365238,0.000004984175,0.021136511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808663,0.000009512754,0.00014422466,0.00014069166,0.00031493636,0.0013039968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985223,0.00010918773,0.000016162163,0.000093157534,0.00013995012,0.0011192841],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008396389,0.00006737473,0.000071280585,0.00013249018,0.0003939435,0.0001404411,0.0001446885,0.00003601323,0.0057561393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027472625,0.000052776802,0.000041260184,0.00006780115,0.00024146655,0.00015496109,0.000020056217,0.00011090757,0.0008152526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014634363,0.00001820229,0.0012462084,0.0000012876334,0.0000033523845,0.0000031828924,0.00023089981,1.3328751e-8,0.000009370338,0.9969872,0.0012682426,0.00023052734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010022782,0.000027532042,0.0055764387,0.000003865293,0.0000072609073,0.0000014243952,0.00040342959,0.000011947217,0.0004330012,0.23529498,0.75800663,0.00013325094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10874646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19118255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93193567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010744964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020223748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115927962","doi":"10.4000/15dc2","title":"Références bibliographiques","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Natural (archaeology); Legislation","score_opus":0.1075770775875879,"score_gpt":0.3381915381364123,"score_spread":0.2306144605488244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115927962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013949332,0.0036522022,0.00043137898,0.005748025,0.00095906755,0.00037912795,0.0015024821,0.00026510016,0.9856677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5193045,0.0056172637,0.006270153,0.00844847,0.004043213,0.00020146469,0.00011621647,0.00009738791,0.45590132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957198,0.0005363486,0.0008097815,0.0009088152,0.0006753572,0.0013499345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962947,0.002123187,0.00027482095,0.00047688733,0.0002475235,0.0005829177],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012129324,0.0007732137,0.0006808616,0.0023738588,0.005656321,0.0017583297,0.0012185733,0.0006592419,0.009367747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015806327,0.0006943024,0.00081948476,0.00034826327,0.0375164,0.00036886623,0.00031221114,0.0011466242,0.00023214224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018898432,0.00015265444,0.00019443296,0.00021842221,0.00013586604,0.00008171747,0.00082184694,0.000007680502,0.000009559136,0.9803242,0.014921407,0.0031132912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001351923,0.0002509838,0.00008052537,0.00082250254,0.00016455873,0.00006262948,0.00020677724,0.00012131663,0.000038545037,0.52509075,0.47259924,0.00042698812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006897009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002688411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5297663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002463053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004587608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133058818","doi":"","title":"Democracy&apos;s great opponent, the problem of oligarchy in ancient and modern political thought","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oligarchy; Politics; Power (physics); Field (mathematics); Clientelism; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06267648772991907,"score_gpt":0.3323432460802996,"score_spread":0.2696667583503805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133058818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5236096,0.0026957097,0.0000017940898,0.009217377,0.00041273076,0.00070240063,0.00013528472,0.0000519081,0.46317324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93241334,0.0003033488,0.000053642707,0.00072973425,0.00073155126,0.0000480924,0.00024668672,0.00005177321,0.06542182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979642,0.00014107126,0.00046716508,0.00039116625,0.0003968295,0.0006395612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990943,0.00020882153,0.00011512735,0.00029039665,0.000077371355,0.00021394604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017096987,0.0003403775,0.0004783462,0.00012788015,0.00020158748,0.00008819171,0.00026778178,0.00018133229,0.0013938064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020959606,0.00022516465,0.00015707842,0.00006661916,0.00039458697,0.0000772748,0.00004771583,0.00052977,0.000037240847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024243639,0.00018530517,0.000049205133,0.0003014448,0.000044404445,0.000012084766,0.021551076,0.000002160836,0.000036400656,0.9742389,0.0008578154,0.0024787674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093012134,0.00023529034,0.002019029,0.00081214745,0.00021283329,0.000015787558,0.007404008,0.0002433979,0.00047232618,0.64273596,0.34419814,0.0007209295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071699265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009244809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4088038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055899225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007616192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160234567","doi":"10.17323/1728-192x-2025-4-206-226","title":"The Contractian Approach to Global Justice: A Critical Overview","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Order (exchange); State (computer science); Element (criminal law); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11238520618723818,"score_gpt":0.4035522586064642,"score_spread":0.291167052419226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160234567","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008450758,0.47901478,0.00030361395,0.14148007,0.003079988,0.002252116,0.0005006157,0.00021371452,0.3730706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33624727,0.5133017,0.0006469305,0.13955279,0.0038990646,0.0010462827,0.0001424965,0.000056425208,0.0051070433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857057,0.00448365,0.0031177378,0.002400023,0.0009585048,0.0033344238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98817325,0.007514475,0.0005002974,0.0017973562,0.00042833228,0.0015862841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036364666,0.0017337614,0.0033623117,0.00007490578,0.004800588,0.00093562057,0.0029205524,0.0013586485,0.0036334936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014660445,0.00094407215,0.0023219208,0.00087037013,0.006570557,0.0002504573,0.0014729844,0.0027879896,0.0024782992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022533679,0.0011248793,0.00003427106,0.005870994,0.00039062396,0.00003059231,0.00014338957,0.0000011886267,0.0000013283529,0.9023709,0.0748068,0.014999688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042331385,0.0004918664,0.0013064535,0.0041195145,0.001594906,0.000016297403,0.0005234568,0.000024696645,7.928877e-7,0.3657136,0.6249522,0.00083291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032869415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009209448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5501454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006639958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049736915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W749902800","doi":"","title":"Pistis - The common Ethos?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Faith; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Term (time); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.04358207401460808,"score_gpt":0.22012463142148667,"score_spread":0.17654255740687858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W749902800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658497,0.00023285089,0.00000785543,0.015564239,0.0004027083,0.0003178206,0.00009953763,0.00008395318,0.11744137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762072,0.000021365948,0.00007643905,0.0011169809,0.00038920878,0.0000012189538,0.000029724875,0.000019586696,0.022138294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983968,0.00025416285,0.00020344052,0.00029585668,0.00041580657,0.00043392778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868566,0.0002901104,0.00013672905,0.00048627052,0.0001679651,0.0002332675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030688365,0.00020984387,0.0002978249,0.00008882167,0.0011192873,0.00011605521,0.0007786699,0.00012893607,0.02292992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058206777,0.00017054618,0.0002689254,0.00010101678,0.0010361369,0.0006424889,0.00031012285,0.0005371788,0.002461998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015513397,0.00038037397,0.017387308,0.00009838726,0.000262102,0.000031115156,0.018018752,0.0000034410948,0.000574715,0.9442623,0.014245834,0.0045805317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011702019,0.00021723674,0.120962426,0.00009995366,0.00017997269,0.0000137350635,0.005218747,0.000045255652,0.00031274313,0.1499489,0.72127557,0.00055528554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009714459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003990624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79431343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006010533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023550236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7504039","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1457110","title":"Bayle Between Spinoza and Rousseau","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"General will; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0239380824950101,"score_gpt":0.2445615588172139,"score_spread":0.2206234763222038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7504039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8193213,0.010584077,0.00035428253,0.042485207,0.00061749667,0.00023248838,0.000027856586,0.0001457497,0.12623154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919487,0.0011302043,0.0000126517125,0.0009978077,0.0037361346,8.074771e-7,0.000005110771,0.000011593494,0.0049108122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776304,0.000053062155,0.0002352985,0.00015666732,0.00019708152,0.001594861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957573,0.00004362109,0.000059305086,0.00009708453,0.00004429707,0.0001799724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000412493,0.00014867261,0.00019482196,0.00006125248,0.0006191668,0.00012349508,0.00015772243,0.000049031834,0.00028293088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024205932,0.00011180546,0.00010012058,0.000028628792,0.00011474587,0.0001946316,0.000028498749,0.0011677953,0.00005972139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013605334,0.000043630454,0.00021461805,0.0000022839806,0.00004585266,0.0000027911412,0.00055257464,1.3365963e-7,0.000007005895,0.9783598,0.0001373126,0.020620374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031246268,0.00044177411,0.00063709426,0.000012103467,0.000035032866,0.00006394587,0.00031777157,0.0000032137616,0.0000113111455,0.810531,0.18749994,0.0001343516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000250656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000618203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18736263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014090932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001595956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50735545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77460314","doi":"10.22329/p.v7i2.3822","title":"Affirmation and Negativity in Spinoza: A Response to Hasana Sharp","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.06651573925094963,"score_gpt":0.281588408400533,"score_spread":0.2150726691495834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77460314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96965814,0.00030670903,0.000013313226,0.009592102,0.00028906297,0.00016324359,0.000030798496,0.000035306704,0.019911312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705476,0.000006671326,0.000051327374,0.0014855333,0.0006863892,0.00001917126,0.000004900103,0.000008386525,0.00068284664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921685,0.000118130825,0.00014802309,0.00011700125,0.000112301655,0.0002877112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995235,0.00014439403,0.00002001408,0.00010116662,0.000018778426,0.00019211766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003077434,0.000095517484,0.00012422504,0.00007523513,0.00008927594,0.00005278758,0.000058422516,0.000027409305,0.00074866146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012320987,0.00007923731,0.00002961408,0.000043383447,0.00007599457,0.0002854223,0.0000494785,0.000090115296,0.00022261313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052403676,0.00038477572,0.0034558377,0.00004400091,0.000014409736,0.0000049574937,0.02233352,0.000001702734,0.00048806312,0.96456945,0.0014825339,0.006696727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081046583,0.00015696128,0.065839015,0.00006965351,0.000017401493,0.000005443211,0.0004972558,0.00012222167,0.00078105845,0.040219534,0.8911391,0.000341919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105525636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064781765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9243499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029367853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006514193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8197318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93289058","doi":"","title":"Leibniz and Toulmin: Rationalism without Dogmas (Pluralism, Pragmatism, and Gradualism)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Argumentative; Pragmatism; Pluralism (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Situated; Principle of rationality; Rationalism; Argumentation theory; Ecological rationality; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03525083964006528,"score_gpt":0.2272521932237552,"score_spread":0.19200135358368992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93289058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96421444,0.0007799552,0.000009716298,0.018545667,0.00016951245,0.00024161505,0.00019116183,0.00007685157,0.015771076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98739123,0.00011066139,0.00068187737,0.0010253084,0.0004930606,8.117671e-7,0.00006462398,0.000022951182,0.010209467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983656,0.00017005434,0.0002460975,0.00042747866,0.0004194049,0.0003713769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989467,0.00015910096,0.00015372506,0.00026080565,0.00014744411,0.00033220707],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032205472,0.00026191003,0.00037415687,0.00015686064,0.00079057354,0.0001226771,0.00025715155,0.00015302004,0.002131795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005635761,0.00026968677,0.00012057499,0.0000737318,0.0009283387,0.001091189,0.0002512066,0.0003552684,0.000101643316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021340825,0.0001773535,0.012079485,0.00009798257,0.00015578758,0.000021927965,0.019178184,0.000002100559,0.00039306632,0.96389854,0.0011934595,0.0025886851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039085755,0.00028092493,0.08050527,0.00021818867,0.00034083394,0.00008227456,0.0032664766,0.0001367034,0.00046789317,0.057126377,0.85267407,0.0009924078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016032679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061036163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052208565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029098703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W951934208","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-9385-1_8","title":"Rationalism Versus Subjective Experience: The Problem of the Two Minds in Spinoza","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellect; Nothing; Identity (music); Rationalism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06252983022880372,"score_gpt":0.2745039343903966,"score_spread":0.2119741041615929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W951934208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019426695,0.00012781956,7.085627e-7,0.0033601318,0.0010629373,0.00042925763,0.00008652073,0.000013474117,0.9929765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42388904,0.000020858395,0.000032899425,0.0008592979,0.0019611795,0.000049702547,0.000022659202,0.000028417046,0.5731359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988162,0.0000322773,0.00035808844,0.00022692449,0.0003707248,0.00019577729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991416,0.00024893857,0.00013436828,0.0003127915,0.000116443676,0.00004590572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010809355,0.00022606149,0.00023831493,0.00004311289,0.00020258177,0.000053588712,0.00040769947,0.00014122637,0.011630833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017115814,0.000107471744,0.00021950794,0.000014309196,0.0011593737,0.00006475039,0.00012667837,0.0006408124,0.000059700287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004794837,0.000029576393,0.000005183816,0.000010077868,0.000028977955,0.0000010094175,0.005998234,3.066814e-7,0.000006872197,0.99344856,0.00021356517,0.00020968048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034010372,0.000035013756,0.000028137167,0.00004704645,0.00001981863,8.07094e-7,0.00022145081,0.0000016343223,0.0001191541,0.4320312,0.56703514,0.00012049965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024440498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013711818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5668216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031924417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005922482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98927265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W952097696","doi":"10.3917/aphi.674.0629","title":"Droits individuels ou droit des peuples ?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de Philosophie","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04900510661809122,"score_gpt":0.2655128374881089,"score_spread":0.21650773087001768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W952097696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16498196,0.028570386,0.00047481264,0.15181276,0.0023050795,0.00068439654,0.0015778384,0.00034329976,0.64924943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96806836,0.0031018583,0.0015645501,0.0036453477,0.013311666,0.000051942272,0.000104469975,0.00013442243,0.0100173745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959713,0.00024803646,0.00076993013,0.0007824918,0.0005014493,0.0017267789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975628,0.00057127513,0.00018313722,0.0006136579,0.000062853454,0.0010062401],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021128726,0.0007006184,0.0006478593,0.0002887294,0.0012795768,0.00034906616,0.00079623284,0.00023519062,0.0021703336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016068362,0.00071328337,0.0006504259,0.00015789321,0.0050691385,0.00037624975,0.00034184707,0.0009676204,0.0015280704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011515092,0.0011899461,0.00019780776,0.000434885,0.00031366528,0.00024335983,0.008059383,0.0001273967,0.00007007427,0.9779829,0.00013941272,0.011126029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012357958,0.0004315398,0.001139568,0.00070182414,0.00021649674,0.00012781726,0.00017547868,0.000037225655,0.00031309578,0.78946906,0.20547868,0.0006734095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037238296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000077158154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8030864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019289755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017807016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W961446640","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511529276.015","title":"Newton and Spinoza and the Bible Scholarship of the Day","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Literature; Philosophy; History; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.040238637750939873,"score_gpt":0.19210889145357438,"score_spread":0.15187025370263452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W961446640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001571676,0.00084032794,7.1293164e-7,0.00052268076,0.0001919064,0.00031762064,0.00030369576,0.00002283723,0.9962285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05306821,0.0004952075,0.0000014803641,0.0003586572,0.000324576,4.1439432e-7,0.0000069621024,0.00001872941,0.94572574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991106,0.00011213169,0.00015693733,0.00024585298,0.00019700828,0.00017748875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991923,0.00019324193,0.000112569534,0.00034278384,0.000058797534,0.00010032221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001537133,0.00022444861,0.00030635126,0.000067995614,0.0004036057,0.00008355273,0.000333509,0.0001383858,0.000060651637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001304618,0.00013795287,0.00016842208,0.0000043429945,0.0022441337,0.00007124397,0.00030294716,0.00046152002,0.0000041869325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109420354,0.000006397498,0.000002450637,0.000054545482,0.00008033622,0.000006714404,0.00031821954,6.8361174e-8,0.000001288436,0.9969303,0.0018934637,0.0005967824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073354586,0.000025323676,0.000038249374,0.00018151094,0.00023967051,0.000004900191,0.000037350765,0.0000050169288,0.00003374125,0.009926351,0.9886024,0.00017194843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015658828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054890384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018119845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023844676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82686037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W997017743","doi":"","title":"Quentin Skinner , Hobbes and Republican Liberty . Reviewed by","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017255223113490512,"score_gpt":0.21745054909058695,"score_spread":0.20019532597709644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W997017743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021685576,0.0037406404,0.00001005242,0.075559594,0.0002777969,0.00021495843,0.000056039982,0.00020564593,0.8982497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88095164,0.00064572616,0.00008979504,0.023953183,0.0009652368,0.000007914717,0.000044985507,0.000013423809,0.093328066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990355,0.000051861076,0.00024642143,0.00024296953,0.00014445992,0.00027883117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949205,0.00005152956,0.000037252557,0.00018350608,0.00005087938,0.0001847652],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011639434,0.00014590585,0.00021000068,0.000029517121,0.00016280914,0.00019252143,0.000108311266,0.000040098577,0.009241139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050184706,0.00009423638,0.000078879726,0.00003146379,0.00016867231,0.00018229792,0.000029558692,0.00012349163,0.000063966814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057986085,0.000094740535,0.000018416424,0.000010709483,0.000008672861,0.0000012860803,0.00025001037,3.5198027e-9,0.000022142263,0.84191465,0.1498923,0.0077812644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016126658,0.00008073826,0.00014705159,0.000022530776,0.000014494572,0.000002459162,0.000040992058,0.000005685249,0.00008576004,0.102947704,0.89634424,0.00014704437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005607018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013736225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8592661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008770565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000056280924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}