{"meta":{"query_hash":"8a935e58ffd2","filters":{"topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought"},"cohort_total":390,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":390,"exported":390,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8a935e58ffd2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Seventeenth-Century+Political+and+Philosophical+Thought"},"results":[{"id":"W107359594","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-2381-0_3","title":"Desgabets: Rationalist or Cartesian Empiricist?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Cartesian coordinate system; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.24895460306451306,"score_gpt":0.31857882451474806,"score_spread":0.069624221450235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W107359594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013522791,0.037013914,0.023345836,0.10794032,0.0021648486,0.00002249778,0.0001280014,0.00013745466,0.8157243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7880293,0.016081467,0.008523382,0.011849286,0.00272463,0.00009908932,0.00009735484,0.00032683933,0.17226869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839884,0.00096124684,0.000045653167,0.00021961598,0.00024440678,0.00013012734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706846,0.0020422675,0.00015540996,0.00036318542,0.00026588587,0.00010473359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027306383,0.00056551467,0.0007435856,0.001119727,0.0025586379,0.005816608,0.0009945855,0.0030994685,0.011683706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063400203,0.0003936553,0.00031575013,0.0013483333,0.031007605,0.011554904,0.0019161854,0.005884019,0.0017932131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038478306,0.0000019403358,0.000018702169,0.0000069684384,8.342789e-7,0.000003716773,0.00038223295,0.000032143405,0.000005597818,0.9960353,0.0020546087,0.0014542037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005171667,0.0000026838854,0.00005137608,0.000034934154,0.0000012818513,0.0000096995955,0.00036289013,0.00015286996,0.000030453868,0.9500047,0.049341224,0.0000027016201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005714359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006855832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011683706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004508988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002699797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039085865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W108433577","doi":"","title":"Aristotle's Political Psychology: Rhetoric, Affect, and International Relations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Affect (linguistics); Politics; Rhetoric; International relations; Persuasion; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029659458411593315,"score_gpt":0.28557353308053574,"score_spread":0.25591407466894245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W108433577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03971747,0.06872174,0.02855092,0.09427806,0.0021330796,0.00004235578,0.00006450662,0.00008406094,0.76640785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591827,0.011948461,0.004004348,0.008008941,0.0018577179,0.00006810229,0.00002375058,0.000033814704,0.014872234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835384,0.0011042303,0.000034888242,0.00011625478,0.00031259024,0.00007815986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983364,0.0012730225,0.000120237106,0.000078092926,0.000118387456,0.000073918854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002177013,0.00038359646,0.0003237919,0.0014469954,0.0031247,0.0050535854,0.00044511192,0.0024371198,0.0026047805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036967217,0.00012904649,0.00018776144,0.0012289358,0.019860538,0.004970997,0.0014403694,0.0024028632,0.00038145098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009017211,0.000008693461,0.00015201503,0.00004163317,0.000002504624,0.000048374146,0.010222512,0.00010816026,0.000106176536,0.97623664,0.003475967,0.009588222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001086566,0.000022121872,0.0013232951,0.00022003027,0.0000051067805,0.00012297546,0.004454632,0.00034301868,0.00012746247,0.8718321,0.12152441,0.000013996495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014641086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010169225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050535854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002041585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010752359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0148127675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1133157046","doi":"10.71781/16163","title":"La possibilité d'un État des États chez Spinoza","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07646611809420892,"score_gpt":0.3504518750832179,"score_spread":0.27398575698900896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1133157046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78870016,0.0044603623,0.0018821607,0.010571586,0.00046817184,0.00003825707,0.00036670436,0.00006473454,0.1934479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105188,0.0007972832,0.00107043,0.0005206325,0.000046967383,0.000019367582,0.000055112418,0.00004173658,0.08692959],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992526,0.00022085418,0.00002131158,0.00013224884,0.000095663105,0.0002772627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873286,0.00042191718,0.00018057655,0.00011759577,0.0003472359,0.00019975749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012493304,0.00028318242,0.00027241185,0.001023121,0.011053474,0.0042170235,0.0005406515,0.0014993773,0.014918145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035294155,0.00027196112,0.00024812197,0.0012050816,0.0045169163,0.0022531375,0.001735013,0.0021189211,0.0008234631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007734211,0.00011234108,0.07014874,0.00019941323,0.000047538724,0.0035730803,0.40884843,0.00022541519,0.0041179946,0.34874812,0.016020332,0.14718518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005799046,0.00011029314,0.14526409,0.000272701,0.000087149514,0.0022415488,0.18027152,0.00038890072,0.0019379131,0.009784411,0.65947735,0.00010607201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47894686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7008952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47894686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008733169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049878894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9523182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1156317859","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511732300","title":"Spinoza and the Stoics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Miller; Epistemology; Scholarship; Ancient philosophy; Key (lock); Similarity (geometry); Law","score_opus":0.05162006955669357,"score_gpt":0.20432904250506495,"score_spread":0.15270897294837138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1156317859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013039712,0.022603646,0.009160974,0.020718731,0.001517856,0.000030254794,0.0001027234,0.00012766833,0.9326985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7420304,0.015438368,0.005843507,0.005349871,0.0013992981,0.00011297681,0.00018384331,0.00018316868,0.22945854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.0004421468,0.00004637489,0.00016680073,0.00023255346,0.00013605558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938333,0.00027848812,0.00006376367,0.00009362951,0.000105061874,0.00007577224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009363341,0.00053052726,0.00047929518,0.0015554738,0.0059129074,0.0067469096,0.0004445501,0.0012824434,0.007991056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001793785,0.00024155638,0.00041062283,0.0018173644,0.021016901,0.006090743,0.0025180527,0.004321862,0.0013390994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023833647,0.0000019081378,0.000026247948,0.00001396698,7.6247704e-7,0.00000676866,0.0004133257,0.000025767651,0.00001530276,0.9953393,0.0023628718,0.0017914558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008797152,0.000009987053,0.00018563203,0.000097291915,0.0000036927725,0.00004987887,0.00077417085,0.00016872404,0.00007225972,0.78109944,0.21752316,0.0000069951043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008608269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00860503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008608269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063907877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00493296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04636866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125461056","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335828.013.015","title":"Spinoza’s Unorthodox Metaphysics of the Will","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Teleology; Epistemology; Naturalism; Philosophy; Volition (linguistics); Relation (database); Causality (physics); Computer science","score_opus":0.0449665154912884,"score_gpt":0.19524217991587384,"score_spread":0.15027566442458545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125461056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01202187,0.011120618,0.037597988,0.03369132,0.0009098062,0.00003352513,0.000108529384,0.00009333422,0.90442294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8083283,0.0080144545,0.013826135,0.006354163,0.00085337844,0.00015301399,0.00009796388,0.00011910175,0.16225362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990879,0.00036171585,0.000033775872,0.00015202063,0.0002467143,0.00011780879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994929,0.00026938217,0.000037392932,0.0000674572,0.00008315391,0.000049653892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013159617,0.00047161223,0.00032714923,0.00089961523,0.003762678,0.0053185835,0.00055773545,0.0017040313,0.0038411384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015974363,0.00024314357,0.00042385992,0.00070974516,0.024169317,0.006245366,0.001537076,0.0040515545,0.00081955123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021391138,0.0000016715023,0.000013044025,0.000005619327,5.465286e-7,0.0000057455677,0.00033665216,0.000031888227,0.000017072087,0.99748707,0.0012108457,0.00088775787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056567214,0.0000050383514,0.00008662323,0.000038534625,0.0000023864761,0.000032196665,0.00037899232,0.00020093215,0.00008125511,0.9120099,0.08715402,0.000004506909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067211045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007320408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067211045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005198489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004345723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03771788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147604912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2314496","title":"Between Citizen &amp; Subject: Placing the People in Machiavelli's Political Imagination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Sociology; Media studies; Art; Law; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.02171065348091497,"score_gpt":0.2447850280927986,"score_spread":0.22307437461188362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147604912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08815374,0.00333693,0.0066855177,0.07387549,0.0007172691,0.000034684435,0.00003639084,0.00005530771,0.82710457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553803,0.000468772,0.0010418622,0.0042059086,0.00026663556,0.000038903963,0.000010392229,0.0000718868,0.038515374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973629,0.0016100488,0.000042546024,0.00028206257,0.00020643794,0.00049604033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987018,0.0006825271,0.00012431083,0.00013413197,0.00010505904,0.00025219712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033877704,0.00035115125,0.0004981575,0.0016620869,0.019937158,0.0143663995,0.0008676254,0.004925006,0.004685566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036281918,0.00034120312,0.00036330405,0.0011689629,0.05898768,0.009361601,0.0050491234,0.008096805,0.00063420105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009464319,0.0000054885713,0.00012823916,0.0000069243956,9.4383836e-7,0.000031456522,0.06035216,0.000014987864,0.000044686436,0.93568385,0.0020150556,0.0017068187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024274128,0.00003259595,0.0010542235,0.00017392774,0.00001177308,0.00013710116,0.100525476,0.00030893512,0.00019315639,0.59237826,0.3051344,0.000025940439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019489752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025744671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019937158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008066667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047216397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058528066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485723223","doi":"","title":"Friendship, Strength of Emotion, and Freedom in Spinoza","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Social psychology; Psychology; Communication; Political science","score_opus":0.020106972861105504,"score_gpt":0.21140665584753135,"score_spread":0.19129968298642586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485723223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5243002,0.002897759,0.0039336067,0.011585663,0.0001824437,0.000020730291,0.000034703266,0.000031974385,0.45701292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738604,0.0000919331,0.000105168365,0.000094356416,0.000011202713,0.0000029622952,0.0000021238961,0.000004065875,0.0023022688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908566,0.00048386832,0.000029406552,0.00013088706,0.00008656809,0.00018359775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989961,0.00049888,0.00011702289,0.00013031327,0.00006452979,0.00019313511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00157305,0.00017745387,0.0003294833,0.00087501446,0.008790643,0.007212126,0.00035172584,0.0011858541,0.0041304636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022239676,0.00014478186,0.00019721285,0.00074726524,0.026492633,0.004798684,0.0033381253,0.0019338275,0.00019920876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006664518,0.000030667852,0.0021849396,0.00002142117,0.000009489926,0.00010940598,0.058613524,0.00007380074,0.00018245663,0.9305671,0.0008596416,0.00728098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064502005,0.000051728577,0.009861092,0.000085784246,0.00004250635,0.00030558874,0.1142636,0.00055043865,0.00034432038,0.8112462,0.06313573,0.00004851291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062167244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011325254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008790643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022387826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007976218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016243577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486079164","doi":"10.20381/ruor-4453","title":"Leo Strauss's Critique of Martin Heidegger","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Levi strauss; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Humanities","score_opus":0.010401475838935895,"score_gpt":0.16858486729328587,"score_spread":0.15818339145434998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486079164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009488053,0.06496493,0.013062253,0.7386039,0.0068184067,0.00003532569,0.000099890196,0.00016128866,0.16676593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6633546,0.032897625,0.011049279,0.15546197,0.015381604,0.00033229843,0.0000672896,0.0006124319,0.12084294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886856,0.007197269,0.00024517687,0.0013148829,0.002033405,0.00052367186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890183,0.008666337,0.00037447913,0.00047623643,0.0012047713,0.00025981176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007957608,0.0007419646,0.0010343682,0.0030062587,0.0063064764,0.0057109413,0.0020106463,0.007699147,0.0036357464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023758415,0.0005207721,0.0005360697,0.0023059358,0.032040942,0.008952716,0.0037544167,0.010550231,0.0013674404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146240545,0.000005768741,0.000054029937,0.000042000498,0.0000040876707,0.000040981024,0.0051359436,0.00019068281,0.000029770774,0.9372103,0.053121112,0.004150584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012013903,0.000012327597,0.0001131647,0.00040747644,0.0000049002138,0.00008409903,0.0017820336,0.0004952754,0.00018859805,0.6059415,0.39092997,0.000028703555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02107236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015403746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02107236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01280385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005560132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092898905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500258600","doi":"10.22329/il.v34i4.4133","title":"John Locke on Inference and Fallacy, A Re-Appraisal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Epistemology; Fallacy; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Toleration; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Rhetoric; Inference; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0582295715362343,"score_gpt":0.28651175291498754,"score_spread":0.22828218137875322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500258600","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00460181,0.42362604,0.01822963,0.42996657,0.010123386,0.000034860182,0.000101082944,0.000065617416,0.11325105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44831324,0.32692406,0.015253553,0.084925584,0.045289405,0.00019290565,0.00021802756,0.00037015797,0.07851312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894365,0.0051321005,0.000555388,0.000995291,0.0034210917,0.0004595853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97150886,0.022961294,0.00058073207,0.00086114457,0.0035635086,0.00052441837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008446921,0.00079360313,0.0010890897,0.005144548,0.005376272,0.010050921,0.0018051474,0.005277888,0.003635693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03130236,0.0005557818,0.0007097695,0.0033852502,0.035276216,0.02225327,0.0027647705,0.0097295595,0.0011878398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023143317,0.000013581635,0.00016388869,0.00022125535,0.000013036939,0.00010112607,0.002595746,0.0002688224,0.000051712,0.93836987,0.046677064,0.011500782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012643919,0.000009097048,0.00019259671,0.00073162816,0.0000067944275,0.000076393655,0.0011654687,0.00026401205,0.000083331935,0.7815467,0.21589683,0.000014486499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008624252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006211209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010050921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006733053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006115908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048852026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507659221","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2125187","title":"Contra Politanism: Against the Teleology of Political Forms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02325209007537717,"score_gpt":0.24728944696807323,"score_spread":0.22403735689269605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507659221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03992158,0.005479295,0.05101761,0.19360007,0.002595478,0.000083361745,0.00022060698,0.0001657478,0.7069163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482265,0.0014165761,0.006455282,0.015686113,0.0027215802,0.00017898672,0.000082926126,0.0002448928,0.024987197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932243,0.0041516786,0.00021742143,0.0010451024,0.00092598406,0.00043540992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887743,0.0066260006,0.0007579506,0.0022983362,0.0011584181,0.00038496073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009715176,0.0005915812,0.001124593,0.002446051,0.0047824224,0.009236005,0.002053553,0.006449419,0.007776871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016406694,0.00047693236,0.0007506401,0.001672392,0.067378126,0.016047373,0.005981081,0.015868995,0.0010562707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004140222,0.000001939791,0.00003726726,0.000006518473,0.0000015037364,0.000004346287,0.0004947151,0.000019286965,0.000007428203,0.99789363,0.00077717984,0.000752063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014524226,0.000005190515,0.00010442762,0.000038228667,0.0000040597697,0.000020333415,0.00056710915,0.00015391967,0.000049349714,0.98405033,0.014987711,0.0000049095215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036292265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003690578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009715176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040365458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032645543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051379323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513512365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2010.10716730","title":"Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Covenant; Prudence; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019850775716241414,"score_gpt":0.21401523493230512,"score_spread":0.1941644592160637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513512365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07581974,0.008351134,0.026481403,0.03809892,0.00073349493,0.000022166534,0.000025385181,0.00003710762,0.85043067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759942,0.0010737559,0.0023835392,0.0025567191,0.00037433126,0.000033541382,0.0000095212445,0.00004067815,0.01753364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973253,0.0012713288,0.00008245501,0.00036216908,0.00053676736,0.00042193595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865204,0.0007573117,0.00013004172,0.00013093572,0.00015502391,0.00017476745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033241527,0.0002853699,0.00033384387,0.0008059001,0.005344072,0.005137337,0.0005598822,0.0020441834,0.0042532254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003563559,0.00021637132,0.00038189287,0.00058530306,0.026579078,0.0072296658,0.0042568278,0.0032870737,0.00042676483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054731527,0.0000037072675,0.00006529322,0.000006938225,8.716284e-7,0.000014650856,0.0019716783,0.000026104455,0.000034443292,0.99613297,0.0005351808,0.0012027835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000896185,0.000017428227,0.00061485945,0.000059364764,0.000004891782,0.000067689776,0.001928552,0.0002190918,0.00014393407,0.92807466,0.06884812,0.000012398316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037580908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041933022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005344072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042044376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001780905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030505478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515279436","doi":"10.24124/c677/2011242","title":"Benedict Spinoza on the Naturalness of Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Democracy; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Perfection; Rationality; State (computer science); Natural (archaeology); Political philosophy; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.12646817222035067,"score_gpt":0.27356599070024895,"score_spread":0.14709781847989828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515279436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038310587,0.0530687,0.015467275,0.26511744,0.0020677643,0.000044742934,0.00014802723,0.00005227693,0.6257232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198747,0.015550302,0.0060177795,0.024311895,0.001165681,0.00007205444,0.000049095637,0.00003405968,0.032924343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962286,0.0018315049,0.00012212356,0.00047594594,0.00093747344,0.0004044221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700457,0.0018689625,0.00014122625,0.00023112659,0.00054458267,0.00020957873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041387626,0.00023544049,0.00041182514,0.0012276776,0.0043752184,0.004031036,0.0004578686,0.0022077532,0.0028009322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004286502,0.00015209812,0.00037655566,0.0008218838,0.02176141,0.0042197914,0.0017900289,0.0041445037,0.00036637206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000495222,0.000003307723,0.000066875575,0.000014872842,0.0000020149598,0.000018772924,0.00039892917,0.000060213475,0.00003351883,0.9934743,0.0039589307,0.001963249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012771203,0.000008425824,0.0005476703,0.00011235289,0.000004650289,0.000053346932,0.0004435095,0.00016883272,0.000103971186,0.88351804,0.11501574,0.000010710429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017138997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02091118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017138997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005824475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062396945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042259753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515559955","doi":"10.1353/ren.0.0197","title":": <i> <i>The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's</i> Leviathan </i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Index (typography); History; Humanities; Media studies; Art; Art history; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044068327765861594,"score_gpt":0.23788055156871646,"score_spread":0.19381222380285487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515559955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005077806,0.76606375,0.001222263,0.021913586,0.015939495,0.000013874339,0.00041808645,0.00012829519,0.19379282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028190589,0.30552533,0.0019283087,0.008943338,0.0152939595,0.000087155684,0.00075064437,0.00055625156,0.63872445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995111,0.00014748925,0.000032501026,0.00008717473,0.00016694482,0.000054810796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994217,0.00025811937,0.00005021177,0.000051226136,0.00012787966,0.00009096904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006179818,0.0011403343,0.0008167408,0.0022279995,0.001665315,0.004357677,0.00079001015,0.001394731,0.08095846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017377697,0.0004483233,0.00028589438,0.0029307671,0.00230888,0.0057109194,0.0016646754,0.0023724085,0.036283836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015153417,0.0000063154025,0.000057780297,0.00027367022,0.000004177113,0.000032691638,0.001119649,0.000018177338,0.000102003025,0.021774404,0.93177354,0.04482254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015684678,0.0000031124573,0.00025088392,0.0002697798,0.0000013898016,0.0000591174,0.00032883883,0.00000910928,0.00004307536,0.0037126255,0.9953166,0.000003991941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008831471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023049217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08095846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023479303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016043283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27083302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519328188","doi":"10.22329/il.v26i3.456","title":"Whately on Arguments Involving Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Rhetoric; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1307698772028859,"score_gpt":0.2664980630822711,"score_spread":0.13572818587938518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519328188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018428758,0.018471474,0.025588065,0.19584508,0.0026263099,0.000045248664,0.000097566764,0.000078604404,0.7388189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.805496,0.010687249,0.009444461,0.051282264,0.0027240778,0.00018021141,0.00009384181,0.000316837,0.11977516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054927,0.006541304,0.0001997839,0.000653456,0.0013274828,0.00072872255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98411,0.012565691,0.0006067705,0.00070556375,0.001563716,0.00044829826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007620146,0.00047883875,0.00058217574,0.0015725407,0.0065663643,0.00905538,0.00089967484,0.004873729,0.0073485663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02044133,0.00026070466,0.0006853483,0.0012122339,0.01931699,0.01365376,0.0037228703,0.0075288867,0.0015876157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007932584,0.0000037793511,0.000038776216,0.00002039053,0.0000020683988,0.000031154534,0.0015618049,0.000041159532,0.000021200029,0.99173355,0.0051826867,0.001355513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018157287,0.000013506931,0.000103676015,0.00025642666,0.000008558714,0.00007156548,0.0020662947,0.00019836653,0.00021687936,0.7665157,0.23051646,0.00001446492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022386166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020180284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00905538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043186494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026685442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040299654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532360327","doi":"","title":"Continental Philosophy in Britain and America","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham Research Commons (Fordham University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continental philosophy; History; Geography; Geology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09409582805681857,"score_gpt":0.28921709229614956,"score_spread":0.195121264239331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532360327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03936269,0.07788042,0.0006808906,0.030185409,0.0017476405,0.000014011905,0.000077498175,0.000044970933,0.8500066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7068088,0.022298979,0.0008073983,0.012059779,0.0008458581,0.00004196298,0.000122612,0.00008090057,0.2569337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989563,0.00041779547,0.000030637122,0.00017676693,0.0001583802,0.00026015265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994955,0.00010720177,0.000041698277,0.000048063266,0.00013078326,0.00017671582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008510967,0.0002682784,0.0003089339,0.001022248,0.0054176343,0.006451304,0.0004768671,0.0017161669,0.0074863215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011417244,0.00014283661,0.000155472,0.0021549177,0.009492028,0.0019599071,0.0032236408,0.0023137608,0.0009875958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031220767,0.00003644297,0.0012779438,0.00010616363,0.000008403253,0.0001752283,0.031795964,0.00008320927,0.00030131818,0.8776114,0.058472317,0.03010042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061620103,0.000008041676,0.0029321082,0.00015757434,0.0000028037346,0.000049030594,0.0060260193,0.000038636575,0.000035062745,0.023646653,0.9670931,0.000004792013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05489429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06120151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05489429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012084948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049572745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109149575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533663822","doi":"10.1080/03612759.2000.10525480","title":"Squaring the Circle: The War between Hobbes and Wallis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History Reviews of New Books","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"History; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.13612469724014664,"score_gpt":0.2535461457230309,"score_spread":0.11742144848288427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533663822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010615122,0.29667196,0.0006970472,0.1261785,0.016422186,0.00002222625,0.000042029445,0.0000395476,0.5493114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27073863,0.130234,0.00064550637,0.048349254,0.0150680775,0.000085106665,0.00007466588,0.00033813168,0.5344666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872464,0.00062368985,0.000031489682,0.0001172755,0.00024937687,0.0002535742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895763,0.00065857195,0.000055866003,0.000056220088,0.00009235516,0.00017934806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017541946,0.0005895914,0.00057260116,0.0021013152,0.011525438,0.012393907,0.00067819597,0.004271012,0.012999373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003859255,0.00039420847,0.00020689044,0.0021778853,0.019355735,0.010380092,0.003906437,0.006502553,0.0024879791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060094226,0.000020354144,0.000100023266,0.00016111492,0.0000058261066,0.0001524162,0.03418711,0.000047284742,0.000118862954,0.657055,0.2741903,0.033901595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041007775,0.000007217062,0.00030056312,0.0005271044,0.0000026493785,0.000053810047,0.011788325,0.000015695767,0.00010255132,0.03606456,0.9511242,0.000009236541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014261942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03569826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014261942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047048205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043457747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04348725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555382697","doi":"10.1353/ren.2008.0558","title":": <i>Paranoia and Modernity: Cervantes to Rousseau</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Paranoia; Index (typography); Modernity; History; Economic history; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.018543780879952898,"score_gpt":0.21732091359523667,"score_spread":0.19877713271528377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555382697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03831794,0.26287416,0.0013559564,0.36345398,0.0045869946,0.000014936644,0.00003768281,0.000045281336,0.32931316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8292383,0.06288331,0.00089959276,0.026186388,0.0036312172,0.000038338992,0.000025970545,0.000070841226,0.07702594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898726,0.00068605406,0.000016142572,0.000111172885,0.000110089866,0.00008923481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993092,0.0004425292,0.00007691164,0.00004221739,0.000060848666,0.000068294445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001546083,0.0003645746,0.0003025488,0.0006099702,0.005769424,0.0040507643,0.00063440984,0.0032165272,0.0047588074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034276294,0.00016319715,0.00019808105,0.0007164454,0.01738341,0.0058132643,0.002483649,0.0044985847,0.0006882158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002764815,0.000008201183,0.0004859351,0.000110028,0.000004502856,0.00019739044,0.07915102,0.000036050635,0.00009978678,0.85713124,0.050399736,0.012348498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010824526,0.000018078568,0.0016360282,0.00082212116,0.0000086336695,0.00062568707,0.04610273,0.000079304526,0.00016780238,0.12128761,0.8292242,0.000017087936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020117044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036645226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020117044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036425446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021392982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567357280","doi":"10.4000/ahrf.7333","title":"Les Lumières radicales. La Philosophie, Spinoza et la naissance de la modernité (1650-1750)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Annales historiques de la Révolution française","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.025213177472480315,"score_gpt":0.279801469906863,"score_spread":0.2545882924343827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567357280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18876705,0.04829711,0.0019086407,0.037705366,0.001594726,0.000030844687,0.0002850667,0.000048591126,0.72136265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8890739,0.004374149,0.00034406275,0.0018918337,0.00029888414,0.000018166693,0.000047797046,0.000027218357,0.10392403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994554,0.00015803856,0.000014240299,0.000101815254,0.000096974596,0.00017350339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958473,0.00015537393,0.0000844424,0.0000353567,0.000068703,0.000071319046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012620636,0.00033240963,0.00016905654,0.0009244807,0.006326901,0.0053844145,0.0002394838,0.0011412259,0.007221344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013096519,0.00016125909,0.0001551524,0.0010112856,0.013883658,0.0025195647,0.001530407,0.0020925277,0.00051790517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033487555,0.000010813849,0.0012329528,0.00007058446,0.0000028139484,0.00006257809,0.046769463,0.000046130444,0.0002176287,0.9219112,0.009213318,0.020429108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027045762,0.00004866158,0.007526793,0.00032581226,0.0000102276645,0.000114336995,0.024829326,0.000067341134,0.00032710072,0.073563635,0.8931392,0.000020487278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0454842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098736204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0454842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009003722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004760102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0904389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W158592271","doi":"10.1007/978-94-015-9777-7_7","title":"Spinoza and Boyle: Rational Religion and Natural Philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Natural (archaeology); Natural philosophy; Conversation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; History; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.038000239693495495,"score_gpt":0.23163844464101735,"score_spread":0.19363820494752185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W158592271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018120341,0.057146057,0.011594576,0.06490076,0.0015846115,0.00003303808,0.000092815266,0.000064610074,0.8464632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74397814,0.016713027,0.0054316255,0.0071594156,0.0015179756,0.00014177116,0.000068104004,0.00010814477,0.22488175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965644,0.0001710384,0.000009045463,0.000053258183,0.00006313411,0.000047019996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939346,0.00041437213,0.000036808004,0.000049498376,0.000060592916,0.000045201665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009094419,0.0005155111,0.00052355806,0.0009696157,0.0054049515,0.0061403676,0.0008003302,0.0031016162,0.0104215145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018721535,0.00038534863,0.00024662568,0.0018169138,0.019774735,0.0098341,0.0016339764,0.005035884,0.00075938646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028595907,0.000003933719,0.000015952088,0.0000058913124,6.4541786e-7,0.000009480612,0.0007368461,0.000024639168,0.00000626657,0.99300134,0.004865933,0.0013263212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010592681,0.0000028349878,0.00011963785,0.00003853023,0.0000024130015,0.000030066038,0.0008079861,0.00012836015,0.000038416892,0.9259731,0.07284373,0.000004348866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014522226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026358688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014522226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047503146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030066965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034863412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592944988","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716589","title":"Memory and Personal Identity in Spinoza","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Personal identity; Identity (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Human being; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Self; Theology; Humanity","score_opus":0.041950645943017395,"score_gpt":0.2478387356892383,"score_spread":0.20588808974622091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592944988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11482119,0.013096445,0.0066779377,0.019305995,0.00067941897,0.00003223252,0.00005611863,0.00007576049,0.8452549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97396934,0.0014979803,0.0010232249,0.00088495074,0.00009138047,0.00001601991,0.000016253824,0.00001964662,0.022481214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989058,0.00042811653,0.000049074606,0.00018111076,0.00017135714,0.0002645495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.00016804897,0.000066029956,0.000089963345,0.00009203301,0.00013078036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013156678,0.0002958279,0.00040862858,0.0013027138,0.010743019,0.011267842,0.00054506643,0.0015890207,0.005520127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014884936,0.00019205292,0.00028524557,0.0009710976,0.024497138,0.00784973,0.0050629475,0.0027077598,0.00058500527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010862394,0.000007917458,0.00022020216,0.000011308155,0.000001858746,0.00008951696,0.008668429,0.00001979681,0.00003171139,0.9876644,0.0007244515,0.0025496003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022525719,0.000020298035,0.0011548972,0.000102558595,0.000015799475,0.00039058737,0.019504987,0.00025511318,0.00016727237,0.8478336,0.13050917,0.000023205836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019446217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020400172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019446217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006137559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025200273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044531345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593216411","doi":"","title":"George R. Clay. Tolstoy's Phoenix: From Method to Meaning in \"War and Peace\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International fiction review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Phoenix; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Art history; History; Art; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04412079408283683,"score_gpt":0.31199922119341866,"score_spread":0.26787842711058185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593216411","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010200107,0.74852717,0.0014247168,0.16737384,0.012625266,0.000020502697,0.00010382461,0.000033380973,0.06887122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031181931,0.78856814,0.0019413539,0.061726708,0.010459868,0.000057598307,0.00010595476,0.00010452668,0.10585388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933356,0.00031316627,0.000030694613,0.00008000433,0.00019200498,0.000050409948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732083,0.002122406,0.00011612851,0.00008159479,0.00024295441,0.00011596804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014967339,0.00055996707,0.00039179294,0.0025856306,0.0018746824,0.0037638254,0.0008227163,0.0026443515,0.008661509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004682854,0.0002380698,0.0002483023,0.0031353796,0.005081732,0.007498697,0.0020106235,0.0043569487,0.0015258909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046373945,0.000021820475,0.00023612253,0.0010257909,0.000013747113,0.00010035839,0.002368273,0.00014516003,0.00012868833,0.17363138,0.7241745,0.098107815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008242441,0.00000697724,0.0004545246,0.0009950863,0.0000053869576,0.00009939538,0.0007821434,0.000031024254,0.00012531868,0.018168911,0.9793172,0.0000057766174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01303934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027739659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01303934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020959736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028525218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028975606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596342993","doi":"","title":"Mécanismes guerriers et fondation de l'État dans la pensée politique de Thomas Hobbes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sens public","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.034565466980952315,"score_gpt":0.2805930422654168,"score_spread":0.2460275752844645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596342993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10186103,0.029222421,0.008784855,0.060123436,0.000649332,0.000022420174,0.00006719061,0.000048718248,0.79922056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434931,0.003632023,0.0010770995,0.0013427897,0.00021775247,0.000029089397,0.000015143889,0.000039806553,0.050153095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986896,0.00083906535,0.000020084843,0.00012254487,0.00012695561,0.00020180718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992212,0.0005524225,0.000059249214,0.000052128173,0.00005386662,0.000061246865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024242834,0.00036797172,0.00029982638,0.0011885387,0.007958956,0.005519496,0.00038070837,0.0020335712,0.0052940096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019448586,0.0002131778,0.00016582139,0.0013240655,0.034022477,0.0041611055,0.0021224653,0.002783387,0.0004160687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059908843,0.0000017493861,0.00004460694,0.000009116801,7.6155965e-7,0.000023394476,0.016068818,0.00004335774,0.000031137453,0.9814208,0.0011975471,0.001152652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014617366,0.000011268935,0.00073332735,0.000172866,0.0000062301856,0.000112563415,0.018894788,0.00021919464,0.00024162985,0.5848314,0.39474294,0.00001901679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024157671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03037608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024157671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00791289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021757951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057412326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602283537","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511763144.018","title":"Bayle's Republic of Atheists","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.045068278594500674,"score_gpt":0.20105049037874712,"score_spread":0.15598221178424643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602283537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006504202,0.004367937,0.00045462625,0.009339128,0.00073754287,0.000011727867,0.000083420746,0.00006127068,0.97844017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086360246,0.0010249477,0.00029507492,0.0048961523,0.00014767857,0.000018826431,0.000041148327,0.000040471376,0.9071755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996948,0.00007157371,0.0000071919753,0.0000561901,0.00008040735,0.00008989134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999119,0.000025776333,0.000008014859,0.000017143415,0.000017234506,0.000019898736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003896841,0.00038365333,0.00020741625,0.00061537273,0.0053350865,0.002935101,0.00029722304,0.0018653558,0.027336834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076113717,0.00018681979,0.00017775632,0.00036317093,0.0033423128,0.0019933358,0.0028629967,0.0033600496,0.0061944607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048850696,0.000020374453,0.00028223518,0.000068158224,0.00000396848,0.00021005946,0.007145575,0.000049486527,0.00025170622,0.7671265,0.18597716,0.038815875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039090373,0.0000066457183,0.00041584275,0.000053259093,0.0000012810623,0.00007710186,0.00067491183,0.000021289552,0.00011152959,0.01695776,0.9816722,0.0000044054013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008130313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03224246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027336834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020090481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015102905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09145081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603308367","doi":"","title":"Nikolai Bukharin. How It All Began","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International fiction review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07606156275727156,"score_gpt":0.2979435055583867,"score_spread":0.22188194280111517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603308367","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078014337,0.7287208,0.00081835274,0.14146249,0.02067332,0.000019216275,0.0003843827,0.000071650255,0.10706969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045071606,0.59008837,0.001656231,0.049476754,0.015638296,0.00012472455,0.0007372541,0.0003305494,0.2968762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987826,0.00037430433,0.00005931438,0.00016773003,0.00048393192,0.0001322469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826765,0.00068851194,0.00015951537,0.000108601955,0.00060894643,0.00016686741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013861676,0.00045712065,0.000447579,0.0029408883,0.0017383537,0.0044414797,0.0007012569,0.0026144648,0.027561756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040978077,0.00025806052,0.00018215354,0.003173185,0.0017437182,0.005571087,0.0018384246,0.002589139,0.01110118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034881283,0.000016155658,0.00017361419,0.00056517194,0.000008604822,0.000041584357,0.0007960661,0.00004817047,0.00010655782,0.106569715,0.78091687,0.110722624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020765035,0.0000021595658,0.00020520022,0.00018456989,0.0000027548342,0.00002019685,0.00019140176,0.000008247823,0.0000594922,0.0065848846,0.9927361,0.0000028784311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01021479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013944849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027561756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002826626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033690808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09220326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606475791","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527944.011","title":"Natural Rights in Locke's Two Treatises","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Gentry; Classics; History; Legend; Law; Art; Philosophy; Ancient history; Art history; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03326505422701463,"score_gpt":0.2097487892938587,"score_spread":0.17648373506684406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606475791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012933154,0.007808263,0.0014694174,0.042535122,0.0017083521,0.000032445056,0.000054944227,0.000048196693,0.93341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37091962,0.0029101411,0.00090990536,0.017309006,0.0010534984,0.00015485297,0.000058722333,0.00011270338,0.60657156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644285,0.0011530471,0.00008401329,0.0004213006,0.0008970037,0.0010018917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984995,0.000735193,0.0000900326,0.00018352116,0.00022138568,0.0002704147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023828922,0.00033591938,0.00030425485,0.0011604257,0.011041596,0.012869501,0.0006966338,0.004406447,0.009915411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067026764,0.00028914819,0.0002555577,0.0009934391,0.01815413,0.0049022646,0.0046433113,0.007980117,0.0011163306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010256891,0.000011597336,0.000068817295,0.000010611545,0.0000010456921,0.00006807284,0.0045513315,0.000022471111,0.000065460896,0.96439403,0.026759636,0.004036685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091718475,0.000007956694,0.0003338369,0.00007881208,0.0000019529853,0.00004899638,0.0024238136,0.000035617115,0.00011519065,0.044041045,0.9528882,0.000015430705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041345794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06188417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041345794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009631113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006186683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0822103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606860543","doi":"","title":"Humanism and Antinomianism: Spinoza on Beasts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Anthropocentrism; Materialism; Reactionary; Politics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.020623937557597633,"score_gpt":0.23546704945462796,"score_spread":0.21484311189703031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606860543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0909729,0.0151737025,0.026145589,0.09506774,0.0013857558,0.000030734558,0.00004765613,0.00009317269,0.77108276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97915626,0.0013554371,0.0019871092,0.0035505746,0.00036639368,0.000021099697,0.000009095982,0.000052007694,0.013502009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963284,0.0023689605,0.00007034058,0.00040725755,0.00047325948,0.00035174857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977604,0.0012528121,0.00021876421,0.00030583303,0.00025573932,0.00020645346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032787388,0.00039820035,0.00044465114,0.0013785254,0.006078715,0.0072478964,0.00058686576,0.0024274082,0.0036990775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039842017,0.00020929957,0.00034708861,0.00092405407,0.05555779,0.007936297,0.0036463437,0.0050819656,0.00043902418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006333385,0.0000028779918,0.00006201526,0.0000089269915,0.0000013258958,0.000018161943,0.0036085907,0.000021822449,0.000043969034,0.9941705,0.00065772026,0.0013978308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009683528,0.000014365312,0.00018770013,0.000041186464,0.0000033203937,0.00003929954,0.0031595887,0.00009910791,0.00012128128,0.93301487,0.06330151,0.000008184243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003824331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038286864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072478964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044271187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019552882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03212118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689745565","doi":"","title":"TURRETIN AND EDWARDS ONCE MORE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Online Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Materialism; Compatibilism; Free will","score_opus":0.028343875053935923,"score_gpt":0.26186805698245985,"score_spread":0.23352418192852392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689745565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044701975,0.0431102,0.001723168,0.81542736,0.020257622,0.000013518272,0.00012788015,0.00009799994,0.114772014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24424326,0.019330759,0.002610137,0.3261434,0.025046377,0.0000897996,0.00012469593,0.0002947516,0.38211673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981725,0.0008962628,0.00004557079,0.00027145093,0.00044583913,0.00016836377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857163,0.00070878805,0.0001319786,0.00010871836,0.00032988406,0.00014897384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011762085,0.0005695381,0.00039073775,0.0007499723,0.002960379,0.004808475,0.0007695874,0.004287467,0.014196997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00858568,0.0001730636,0.00032992868,0.0005336074,0.0030993181,0.0052601886,0.0025407667,0.005822286,0.0040638237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035998008,0.000010404371,0.00029480387,0.000069402406,0.000007544218,0.00026590558,0.0037491706,0.00007098843,0.00013084318,0.45471916,0.5248611,0.015784677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024465392,0.00000766097,0.00026606699,0.00011035928,0.0000022327547,0.00019857133,0.0013856743,0.00006621749,0.00008837293,0.029906593,0.96795434,0.000011402497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00416553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078026988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014196997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019494606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000874446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047493696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1717412269","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498275.009","title":"Stoics, Grotius, and Spinoza on Moral Deliberation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Literal (mathematical logic); Interpretation (philosophy); Literal and figurative language; Deliberation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.061458817884329664,"score_gpt":0.19960013981442742,"score_spread":0.13814132193009776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1717412269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018749988,0.02120861,0.015886988,0.0450003,0.00047811557,0.000032137803,0.000090339665,0.000050617953,0.89850277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077118,0.007241624,0.006172053,0.0046094125,0.00039600526,0.00009963255,0.000056529585,0.000096666045,0.073616244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982095,0.0012649248,0.000033264394,0.00013554184,0.000200054,0.00015668164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985519,0.0009585973,0.00009797798,0.00015344929,0.0001416305,0.000096454736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018471903,0.0005799104,0.00041161457,0.0011336462,0.004749611,0.0063277315,0.0007739194,0.0025978957,0.005207819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003355725,0.00025599668,0.00032856484,0.0015143992,0.026593553,0.0056756907,0.0023294052,0.0037501135,0.0009097947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041422154,0.0000032860312,0.000040806204,0.000011872995,0.0000014691306,0.000014285308,0.0013620587,0.0001491879,0.000009802318,0.993985,0.0029965534,0.0014215524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008024198,0.0000025947465,0.00008705316,0.0000683951,0.0000020058546,0.000017716122,0.00087573205,0.00017236936,0.000029900104,0.9604576,0.038275376,0.0000030653932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068227984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009401521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068227984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063586845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036555056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046135664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734524275","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527944.005","title":"The Problem of Grotius and Hobbes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Parliament; Law; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Commonwealth; Natural law; Separation of church and state; Nothing; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03411386547644157,"score_gpt":0.18819460964816473,"score_spread":0.15408074417172316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734524275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015788913,0.014378671,0.002118625,0.08441929,0.0022953888,0.000019010784,0.00008945881,0.000051501273,0.88083905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7275778,0.005907774,0.0019229641,0.032405213,0.0030642538,0.00012012006,0.000077453784,0.00023166029,0.2286928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968418,0.0013618474,0.000056539884,0.0005911332,0.0004952869,0.00065333175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986909,0.0006844797,0.0000824763,0.00015038002,0.00016293579,0.00022878665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002496805,0.0006078366,0.00058840064,0.0013037863,0.014273364,0.0077831796,0.0010980337,0.005756897,0.012110194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054297163,0.00044436808,0.00022174978,0.0009824913,0.037853815,0.0065802736,0.0048563136,0.008274966,0.002306897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001049109,0.0000033275032,0.000035595775,0.0000064586407,7.82896e-7,0.000022719263,0.005808848,0.000009047163,0.000015389842,0.97908896,0.01246136,0.002536968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021293743,0.000012812697,0.00044314566,0.00015505857,0.0000031727052,0.00011288328,0.008516774,0.000048224014,0.00011817673,0.3822365,0.608316,0.000016031383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031867217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04662423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031867217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076017347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003505675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06336343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1781552152","doi":"10.3138/topia.8.91","title":"George Grant and Leo Strauss: Modernist and Postmodernist Conservatisms","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Art; Art history; Psychology","score_opus":0.16141122880671205,"score_gpt":0.2679621421943576,"score_spread":0.10655091338764555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1781552152","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028278708,0.03950858,0.003045388,0.4895942,0.0032989506,0.000024281964,0.00009561127,0.00005898748,0.4360953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78570235,0.012084999,0.0018387887,0.044687774,0.0049905446,0.00010969507,0.000041264448,0.00019841021,0.1503461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752265,0.0010447009,0.00005524594,0.00031467486,0.0006481943,0.0004144181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934057,0.0044800965,0.00030697134,0.00047220747,0.00094950246,0.00038546036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046529677,0.00044252927,0.00061180256,0.0017706646,0.012187976,0.009801807,0.0017480272,0.008687226,0.013047634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012781761,0.00033884536,0.00028239784,0.0027303656,0.039606098,0.013976073,0.004959061,0.008628484,0.0009456029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067866267,0.000007529483,0.000051789542,0.0000121964185,0.000001347369,0.000016212192,0.0049137603,0.00002233737,0.000014131857,0.97194177,0.02117161,0.0018405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000220592,0.000004814835,0.00036441252,0.00010492148,0.000004557385,0.000044391356,0.0071132663,0.000121716505,0.00007036153,0.764628,0.22750637,0.000015170191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05212737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09397802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05212737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010863625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077567585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10364789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180170357","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-2381-0_7","title":"Spinoza's Eternal Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immortality; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Self; Theology","score_opus":0.15642576640068467,"score_gpt":0.28487781440510207,"score_spread":0.1284520480044174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180170357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011046552,0.0044957907,0.0030884445,0.008803615,0.00048000788,0.000008895813,0.000041511357,0.00004174117,0.9719934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6834739,0.0028659648,0.0021708005,0.0023122039,0.00028157758,0.000043679123,0.000055506276,0.00009074412,0.30870554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995442,0.00019686835,0.000009592753,0.000097836746,0.00007264081,0.00007867253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997372,0.0001144725,0.000019891237,0.000050475828,0.000044442586,0.000033479268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073291396,0.00030177244,0.0003035644,0.0006092498,0.0055332514,0.0058960863,0.00045410334,0.0014316399,0.008035609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001144092,0.00019153427,0.00022217113,0.00060453796,0.01589825,0.0051685795,0.0014700455,0.0034760828,0.0010799982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035210244,0.000001819567,0.000020749841,0.000003389257,3.4688583e-7,0.0000072679472,0.0008727141,0.00001086177,0.000009959016,0.99612457,0.0018085643,0.001136235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010638839,0.0000063184343,0.00024191084,0.000055364722,0.00000344986,0.000071756825,0.002169146,0.0001270758,0.00009296195,0.6803838,0.3168307,0.000006814353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014254612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022183463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014254612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036345893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024502978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02834326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1829447795","doi":"","title":"Freedom Under an Order of Public Law: From Hobbes Through Hayek to Republicanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negative liberty; Law; Liberalism; Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); CONTEST; Theme (computing); Classical liberalism; Politics; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.24696356548208112,"score_gpt":0.3268942416251041,"score_spread":0.07993067614302299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1829447795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092123285,0.021876998,0.014693763,0.06268501,0.0010885971,0.00002774398,0.00004124591,0.00006851289,0.80739486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558555,0.0036734976,0.0014242956,0.0036141286,0.00047007177,0.00002945644,0.000013658236,0.00005161102,0.034867704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846435,0.00094105117,0.000026641037,0.00017029,0.00017921094,0.0002183612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.0006049915,0.000050997645,0.00011129501,0.00005887335,0.00006913273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024281566,0.00026988026,0.0003588187,0.0009134162,0.0061923503,0.007203412,0.00041526867,0.002049168,0.0037481277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026429612,0.00022343299,0.00024357841,0.00084294385,0.038136028,0.0074783964,0.0030088513,0.005066121,0.00064262486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049547743,0.0000043878204,0.000027761569,0.0000065736454,6.206071e-7,0.00001647426,0.006364994,0.000030405328,0.000024696454,0.9911376,0.0008946981,0.0014869139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009263292,0.000011587058,0.00014165918,0.00008042782,0.0000023526216,0.00003276411,0.0052538314,0.00015898155,0.000109678804,0.89025164,0.103940986,0.0000068237346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004214247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004393619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007203412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056036613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019009326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04065758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942255890","doi":"10.22329/p.v7i2.3820","title":"Hasana Sharp's &lt;i&gt;Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization&lt;/i&gt;: A Response","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04174719629087392,"score_gpt":0.2596420569460835,"score_spread":0.21789486065520958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942255890","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040934016,0.013041265,0.0014029101,0.912024,0.0054026404,0.0000111059035,0.000041659954,0.000038619357,0.06394442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24891542,0.0139216995,0.003101766,0.5326532,0.008730335,0.00009220525,0.000046029763,0.00014764768,0.1923918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867624,0.0006423966,0.000032567106,0.00021674777,0.00026094032,0.00017101203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977914,0.0014942238,0.00012378895,0.0000920124,0.0002724717,0.0002259934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024097485,0.00045626916,0.00032489208,0.0006986134,0.005857342,0.0069962977,0.0010242073,0.008115354,0.006802018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040683793,0.00026447553,0.00039845248,0.0008646737,0.015498742,0.00853599,0.0032531468,0.011379945,0.00092377845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010122883,0.00001559848,0.00011887897,0.00004760692,0.000003509847,0.000085784115,0.0045147776,0.000043247124,0.00010808157,0.6606971,0.3293121,0.0050433516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015615047,0.000015762902,0.00032385648,0.00015966585,0.0000053185618,0.00011520411,0.006220868,0.00016452947,0.00037115673,0.12149076,0.8710938,0.000023430659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071475483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124478135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008115354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040180488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030555164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029153168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943661646","doi":"10.1111/papq.12087","title":"Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Universality (dynamical systems); Ontology","score_opus":0.06398916241848439,"score_gpt":0.2429104741561115,"score_spread":0.1789213117376271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943661646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16515368,0.012141882,0.20002574,0.06308913,0.0010230648,0.000076158176,0.00026403213,0.0002280958,0.55799824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854754,0.0008743663,0.007999452,0.0009544296,0.00014479276,0.00003868097,0.000025074974,0.000028363094,0.004459336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978009,0.0011904528,0.000090654146,0.00032969544,0.00038252654,0.00020578502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774617,0.0012649498,0.00019712932,0.00038196807,0.0002266412,0.00018322153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036820807,0.00036875485,0.0006393967,0.002169607,0.0034236282,0.006155208,0.00065277703,0.0016061043,0.0027243465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034526144,0.0002912387,0.0005521975,0.0011222621,0.044816345,0.0100653125,0.0034870098,0.0038603626,0.0002098855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027160227,0.0000014172506,0.00003140794,0.0000058282926,0.0000010410959,0.000008266808,0.0006913181,0.0000430959,0.0000213547,0.9985757,0.0001312032,0.0004866977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004593929,0.0000028869867,0.00009105349,0.0000178839,0.0000030232259,0.000019695794,0.0005341752,0.00025238257,0.000042831423,0.99057335,0.008454358,0.0000038268286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065714614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004734706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065714614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005037901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024532776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036552727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1945573432","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9191.2011.00386.x","title":"ON LAW, TRANSGRESSION, AND FORGIVENESS: HEGEL AND THE POLITICS OF LIBERALISM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Forum","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Forgiveness; Liberalism; Politics; Citation; Marine transgression; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.056689563821492726,"score_gpt":0.23804338644763562,"score_spread":0.18135382262614289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1945573432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06916832,0.025976676,0.010295759,0.19848911,0.00092258333,0.000031246313,0.000048288322,0.000042884672,0.69502515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96709675,0.003025972,0.0009084819,0.006013117,0.00059044576,0.00004007737,0.000009207015,0.000034304652,0.022281628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918465,0.006034731,0.00012456258,0.00043084807,0.00078241935,0.0007810568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98591286,0.012269706,0.0004494141,0.0005824965,0.0004590846,0.0003264712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0118631665,0.0005475698,0.00077724893,0.0021211447,0.011184009,0.016425049,0.0014768267,0.009609656,0.005001492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013388112,0.0004177241,0.00041447332,0.002377618,0.12802383,0.015452369,0.0060359337,0.011394514,0.00040767514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033904148,0.0000031617876,0.00002300549,0.000004654841,7.367494e-7,0.000011355758,0.0037622987,0.000038472128,0.0000066719,0.9949778,0.00063847547,0.0005298989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008306338,0.0000032332098,0.00006427231,0.00005393367,0.0000017438332,0.000014132239,0.0044521387,0.000085698084,0.00003319479,0.9831092,0.012168429,0.0000057459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012100614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013633533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016425049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010376272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075104106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075285494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946077801","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511527944","title":"The Politics of Liberty in England and Revolutionary America","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Natural law; Law; Political philosophy; State of nature; History; Political science; Classics","score_opus":0.02390638862311904,"score_gpt":0.1934593595791523,"score_spread":0.16955297095603328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946077801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30291584,0.047110856,0.00051607273,0.04217539,0.00045503967,0.000019830331,0.000055888937,0.000018650593,0.6067324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453375,0.0038111848,0.00012838429,0.0022214316,0.00012007806,0.000023154913,0.000019990805,0.000009183707,0.048329063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985765,0.0004217323,0.000034967983,0.00010667669,0.0002034137,0.0006566274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922204,0.00042458443,0.00009204165,0.00004750286,0.00006528642,0.00014847015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011325695,0.00014544772,0.00026184157,0.00077432697,0.00750131,0.00493054,0.00039390702,0.0014262035,0.0047857943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002035828,0.0001689966,0.00016757667,0.0008211843,0.015021357,0.0032465898,0.00486744,0.0030884054,0.00028514606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036685375,0.000021595612,0.00090931106,0.000041503667,0.0000040739183,0.00028026773,0.04720655,0.00008920853,0.00015382587,0.9392882,0.0039400402,0.008028795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098439785,0.000045699242,0.015027129,0.000443209,0.000014489604,0.00028743342,0.036874924,0.00013300804,0.000257404,0.18770096,0.75908387,0.000033456825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13425417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19892967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13425417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015307045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005983619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26694542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W196222361","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_5","title":"An Invisible Nature: The Origin of Thomas Hobbes’s Civil Laws","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0386012694781873,"score_gpt":0.23559180865100346,"score_spread":0.19699053917281617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W196222361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012727203,0.007881857,0.007489108,0.02531337,0.00092598406,0.000019135827,0.000038473343,0.00003604058,0.9455688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69588554,0.0043627503,0.0030527073,0.007391128,0.0011372602,0.00008120004,0.000038658345,0.00018737052,0.2878634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988826,0.0006169667,0.000020693546,0.00014119843,0.0001784956,0.00016006791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831593,0.0011811771,0.00006505625,0.00017086345,0.00015862487,0.00010830416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020014131,0.00036461148,0.00035006745,0.001207345,0.006570328,0.007552979,0.00068225805,0.0039726435,0.006689207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004473002,0.0003830613,0.0002529038,0.001002225,0.03643187,0.0070839506,0.0025261093,0.0069702286,0.0012288059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015283516,0.0000019697434,0.000009181862,0.0000027958054,3.0078442e-7,0.000008794167,0.0018332063,0.000016903465,0.000009377568,0.99516183,0.0021853556,0.00076875417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050679864,0.0000040068603,0.00008417751,0.000052827367,0.0000017025209,0.000028734643,0.0012928168,0.000091277674,0.00008704869,0.8621781,0.13616805,0.0000061902115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009505262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015201837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009505262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00452929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027904476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032862425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964484056","doi":"10.7202/009811ar","title":"Le meilleur régime selon Leibniz","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.15795675768582132,"score_gpt":0.31523945609858,"score_spread":0.1572826984127587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964484056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016356492,0.036222167,0.05292815,0.13179316,0.0070081693,0.00008956236,0.00025900707,0.00026146552,0.7550818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58216745,0.018549941,0.024592215,0.035920333,0.005204117,0.0004633723,0.00018626974,0.00032397255,0.33259225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394155,0.0019731352,0.0003292067,0.0013037587,0.0018634589,0.00058903877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982994,0.0006454454,0.00016114891,0.00033723717,0.000411003,0.00014575901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006078124,0.00087337644,0.0007117141,0.0018539566,0.004133705,0.008352866,0.0010946357,0.0049809674,0.005849561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065193735,0.00038010534,0.0008495427,0.0013285246,0.02058319,0.008810234,0.003927035,0.008559553,0.0023756146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053202098,0.000002304856,0.00003608336,0.0000110192,0.0000023029227,0.000010157232,0.00059512287,0.000024819485,0.000048980415,0.9939335,0.0029566097,0.0023738411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023172692,0.000024861332,0.0003153351,0.00017519738,0.000011089796,0.00008384517,0.00055545766,0.00024860018,0.0005333245,0.63597393,0.36202574,0.000029432365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006500715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056153564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010129412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010129412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006058785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073494315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966094773","doi":"10.1353/cjs.2006.0062","title":"Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Positivism; Law; Epistemology; Injustice; Disappointment; Democracy; Praise; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04212951516226033,"score_gpt":0.24710499121656612,"score_spread":0.2049754760543058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966094773","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015627757,0.9937982,0.00002179922,0.0042061303,0.0014204736,0.0000024971619,0.0000083712,0.0000014459055,0.00052547874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00046349328,0.9920284,0.000048883645,0.003276442,0.003271008,0.000009117598,0.000023612,0.00000316926,0.00087593164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805874,0.0006691762,0.00019321925,0.0002423614,0.00071562926,0.00012078963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472356,0.003244186,0.00057459617,0.00008601046,0.0010936693,0.00027800738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00224564,0.0012394264,0.001833443,0.0053843274,0.0007228557,0.0044219457,0.001310728,0.0028517721,0.008096318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009689016,0.0005367095,0.0006791956,0.009775324,0.0027434977,0.0054919017,0.0013834555,0.003986937,0.0036908078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055158493,0.00002060132,0.00022059589,0.020328004,0.000110605266,0.00009390689,0.00024308664,0.00017238814,0.00011900665,0.009674988,0.705628,0.26333377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015422112,0.000015164507,0.000590126,0.016546546,0.0000493421,0.00028900348,0.00015521688,0.000033512028,0.00004269665,0.0038495122,0.9783901,0.000023360453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005079683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064367787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008096318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003105763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008211503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027084827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967640434","doi":"10.7202/007723ar","title":"Phillis Wheatley and the Sentimental Tradition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentimentality; Poetry; Manifesto; Sensibility; Literature; Romance; Oppression; Politics; Enlightenment; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.032026646230292784,"score_gpt":0.21023121430428104,"score_spread":0.17820456807398827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967640434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04683041,0.0103327315,0.0040252544,0.141808,0.002146356,0.000014808069,0.000023309518,0.000050114068,0.79476905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86623424,0.006624182,0.001047695,0.013278102,0.0018427242,0.00003711066,0.00001874905,0.00011748414,0.11079978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988991,0.0005035126,0.000021848513,0.00015629364,0.00030923157,0.00011006158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987685,0.00060871313,0.00016431545,0.000099890734,0.00023485062,0.00012376007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014808205,0.00030139147,0.00016563667,0.00076720427,0.007714988,0.0064891027,0.0004645583,0.0018396623,0.0033076687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038703727,0.0001923254,0.00011222918,0.00093835685,0.018556613,0.0049364557,0.0021944237,0.00533975,0.0005766211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017166876,0.000010069391,0.00042930845,0.000030019217,0.0000025840782,0.00013825363,0.02361674,0.00006065119,0.0001279447,0.9271941,0.038795035,0.009578094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012269441,0.000018895773,0.0009993047,0.00019101024,0.0000051067145,0.00026384264,0.014561785,0.00029273672,0.0002927377,0.22514945,0.7581969,0.000015960102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061922036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007400488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007714988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036855268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015770452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026740551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968812159","doi":"10.2466/pms.2001.92.1.299","title":"Reply to Fudin and Lembessis's Critique of Malik and Paraherakis's Commentary regarding the Capacity of the Unconscious","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Scope (computer science); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Personal unconscious; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03432317897900429,"score_gpt":0.25115721607512836,"score_spread":0.2168340370961241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968812159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017471601,0.00095176394,0.00009009757,0.99141955,0.006014048,0.000003119364,0.000016679653,0.000010438248,0.0013196863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050346595,0.0003736905,0.00015834637,0.9821082,0.008911211,0.000028374296,0.000006892298,0.000019192565,0.00335949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374336,0.0022878817,0.0004641221,0.0010256141,0.0016587946,0.0008202034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97574914,0.017122362,0.0009316186,0.0006687282,0.0039483607,0.0015798708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01036236,0.00087455224,0.0015507273,0.000891359,0.008943393,0.006876769,0.0056608613,0.079917826,0.005850368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046202753,0.00080271286,0.0010129537,0.0014558246,0.01253833,0.008248322,0.0042709406,0.0627969,0.0036551252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003215713,0.000012363769,0.00010950899,0.0000570765,0.0000064456844,0.00024409013,0.0012202463,0.000048377085,0.000062055595,0.017898943,0.97681934,0.0034895123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057722016,0.00002989996,0.001180498,0.00051886786,0.000021466783,0.00046438907,0.0040917345,0.00037434307,0.00031431214,0.06697499,0.9258855,0.00008638154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015378664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027040072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079917826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078027314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006673655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05661297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971960450","doi":"10.1080/09608780801969266","title":"Modernity, The Human Animal and Philosophical Tradition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology","score_opus":0.12834011770641915,"score_gpt":0.2577913704305848,"score_spread":0.12945125272416566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971960450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06433745,0.13147257,0.004801173,0.06989121,0.001270917,0.000018655435,0.0000860653,0.000039554394,0.7280825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528468,0.015639171,0.0013699502,0.003382864,0.0013235155,0.00002209905,0.000025732588,0.0000361864,0.02535371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851817,0.0008958783,0.00004752679,0.0001885779,0.00017973117,0.00017016119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680907,0.0023123105,0.0002041363,0.0002988951,0.0001930747,0.00018242939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030284757,0.00021750502,0.00045664443,0.0018136634,0.0041428013,0.005033706,0.0005921795,0.0023047382,0.008611529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036116573,0.00024654387,0.00019247437,0.0020463187,0.043026768,0.0052655702,0.0019668017,0.0040917015,0.00043190335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009171938,0.0000073770952,0.00016800474,0.00003054512,0.000003951877,0.000016619151,0.0047893818,0.000041548097,0.000025943316,0.9905847,0.0013481453,0.0029746173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025125542,0.000015420695,0.0011677723,0.00020136859,0.00000750635,0.00005535915,0.0028471637,0.0000960646,0.000034635967,0.84927166,0.14626774,0.000010165549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008430821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015094687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008611529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057466845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032947673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041695237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977119396","doi":"10.1163/157181012x638061","title":"The Exclusionary Boundary of the Early Modern International Community","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordic Journal of International Law","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Referent; International community; Character (mathematics); Law; Universality (dynamical systems); Hegelianism; Sociology; Political science; Public international law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04315197082929643,"score_gpt":0.2695386193016033,"score_spread":0.22638664847230686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977119396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18462609,0.005005477,0.016943082,0.015171011,0.0005400185,0.00004776637,0.000039167633,0.000043975204,0.77758336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786759,0.0008062783,0.0015707525,0.0010347685,0.00023496675,0.00006556378,0.000022056025,0.000032445005,0.017557245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419564,0.002611793,0.00018351145,0.0007173809,0.0014221207,0.0008696086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967573,0.0010658643,0.00035777225,0.0004511613,0.0006645095,0.0007034243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051982994,0.0002433639,0.0005331834,0.0024707185,0.013695905,0.011180925,0.0011117407,0.0024219365,0.0029471419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067820386,0.00023559587,0.00027808742,0.0012485625,0.049543735,0.009047899,0.010527998,0.005861711,0.00039058563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067001192,0.000007917945,0.00012682796,0.000007066256,9.249925e-7,0.0000331509,0.015598263,0.00002661401,0.00005752937,0.98137134,0.0004156245,0.002348085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018067994,0.00003391525,0.0010188703,0.00021056138,0.0000070226824,0.00018417319,0.02054583,0.00031617057,0.0001922379,0.77074504,0.20670317,0.000025041663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065439753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062327855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013695905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005935215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061720912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043063223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978448772","doi":"10.5840/epoche20141138","title":"The Hobbesian Ethics of Hegel's Sense-Certainty","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Epoché A Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Certainty; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09766390261886065,"score_gpt":0.278435884249824,"score_spread":0.18077198163096336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978448772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08128016,0.01254939,0.15586948,0.12327657,0.0014117787,0.000062927626,0.00009608632,0.00013038497,0.62532324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97439134,0.001588979,0.0080773365,0.0043406044,0.00035892046,0.00008327688,0.000017178632,0.000070322654,0.01107201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882848,0.00779167,0.00030770843,0.00081347005,0.002171438,0.0006308711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286216,0.004983267,0.0003485719,0.0008001083,0.0006711608,0.00033463363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011139684,0.00051825756,0.0005869572,0.0013117241,0.0051725577,0.008758812,0.000920467,0.003421478,0.0013191773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015111448,0.00038879467,0.00041935078,0.00096385303,0.07578183,0.008103854,0.005892792,0.0056467312,0.00042554853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037304574,0.0000017678308,0.000028043156,0.000008629868,0.0000014541489,0.00001108135,0.0039804527,0.000053377178,0.000030800882,0.9946878,0.00039908252,0.00079383125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004547571,0.0000047759277,0.000039050177,0.000049612674,0.0000018249438,0.000031957596,0.001786696,0.00010994223,0.00012630183,0.9774606,0.020378636,0.000006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002146037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015425069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011139684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004141411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003250445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058912992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978745839","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070023","title":"Hobbes's Modern Prometheus: A Political Philosophy for an Uncertain Future","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Humanities; Relation (database); Politics; Epistemology; Power (physics); Ethnology; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07818658179183259,"score_gpt":0.3097394167927425,"score_spread":0.2315528350009099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978745839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019286279,0.020808091,0.06833903,0.09153074,0.0016730811,0.000040153584,0.00007165854,0.000053223015,0.79819775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88813186,0.008244082,0.013557899,0.011053189,0.0021121588,0.00018558897,0.000043882555,0.00009104608,0.07658029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754936,0.0016336769,0.0000456957,0.00020141019,0.00041626272,0.00015363946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989973,0.0006319211,0.000072042545,0.00008813479,0.00011967038,0.000090924594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032620681,0.00043581479,0.00034888004,0.0010976775,0.004550196,0.004854392,0.0005720829,0.0026325278,0.0035786955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023563674,0.00027285557,0.00034970188,0.0007320372,0.024239732,0.0056435727,0.0023789972,0.0049043773,0.0006008441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001454858,0.0000011259749,0.000008418221,0.0000039864003,3.4932242e-7,0.0000053025046,0.0005324833,0.00003248528,0.000014419615,0.9983354,0.00055484945,0.0005098324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048927996,0.0000061723213,0.000063870735,0.0000421689,0.0000013954495,0.000027915326,0.0005385518,0.00021689049,0.000052349427,0.9157739,0.08326753,0.0000042305105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002144204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023334625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004854392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004350223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022694352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031563282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979349333","doi":"10.1080/10848770500335578","title":"Necessitating Justice: Hobbes on Free Will and Punishment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03946381306336874,"score_gpt":0.24925817394707728,"score_spread":0.20979436088370854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979349333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018265327,0.019609595,0.016081654,0.097432934,0.001706831,0.00003614781,0.000037759804,0.0000321159,0.84679776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88830984,0.006828021,0.0033374084,0.022356752,0.0019600394,0.00013552935,0.00002732508,0.00009763376,0.07694756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963552,0.0022291949,0.00006473878,0.0003023542,0.00057161174,0.00047687677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978935,0.0014341311,0.00013415475,0.00016459667,0.00023242818,0.00014117823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036948796,0.000567703,0.00065717526,0.0011911301,0.007488597,0.007006423,0.0009449917,0.0066318205,0.0044898805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005333989,0.00032070527,0.0004984532,0.0007154666,0.036772605,0.0060943607,0.00358198,0.007052581,0.000986753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026456346,0.0000029533785,0.000013786512,0.0000056652134,7.582726e-7,0.00002130596,0.0008948778,0.000048184538,0.000011820479,0.9967194,0.0017251936,0.00055338815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004066904,0.000004338546,0.000042970045,0.000041152223,0.000001294014,0.000018101358,0.00037788422,0.0000917372,0.00002503647,0.97527844,0.024110738,0.000004188058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044477168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005227105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007488597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006181502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002071427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991988842","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905419988","title":"Kant's Critique of Hobbes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Philosophy; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Politics; Conviction; Absolute (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.037417700213186855,"score_gpt":0.2740457777603219,"score_spread":0.23662807754713505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991988842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006508755,0.13004376,0.015318511,0.12192633,0.004816766,0.0000281057,0.00019840522,0.000088498025,0.7210708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5533378,0.05200971,0.012393217,0.07020642,0.0075791837,0.0003183048,0.00017958072,0.0003219832,0.30365375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997315,0.0013981392,0.000076004595,0.00027830404,0.00062754884,0.00030512505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990866,0.0005804034,0.00006447788,0.0000738733,0.0001358511,0.000058791316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022414483,0.0007645593,0.0005808959,0.0018719744,0.0053640516,0.0051775286,0.000995827,0.004854097,0.006690566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038105135,0.00052129803,0.0005179891,0.0018369954,0.019351518,0.004702754,0.0025184553,0.0059223296,0.0022114948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001136833,0.000005265079,0.000032771168,0.000027579359,0.000004248699,0.000024400773,0.0014340482,0.00009432792,0.000038476028,0.9537998,0.04033945,0.004188332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006344428,0.000005902681,0.0001798068,0.00014183183,0.0000036358772,0.00004830272,0.00045849878,0.00007872659,0.00011948189,0.7203225,0.27862465,0.000010294232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007845364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009685247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007845364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050785043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003179768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036847353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992984494","doi":"10.7202/014964ar","title":"Du matérialisme à l’immatérialisme : le problème âme-corps dans la philosophie clandestine","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Tangence","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.034218817296771266,"score_gpt":0.24525474584470702,"score_spread":0.21103592854793576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992984494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08945531,0.05299507,0.062064145,0.12982127,0.001752437,0.000040878916,0.00009726095,0.000111581816,0.6636621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95052314,0.006926964,0.005652405,0.0032650323,0.0008525802,0.00006566898,0.000028429691,0.00007715223,0.032608673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749607,0.0014675942,0.000057182904,0.00031043484,0.00044684586,0.00022177104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805826,0.001270934,0.00016750582,0.00021938785,0.00016543469,0.00011850447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029284314,0.00043269296,0.00036437358,0.0015897849,0.005094503,0.006926636,0.00086159125,0.0022770737,0.0050393427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035638364,0.00031656423,0.00047152414,0.0014224504,0.03824015,0.0077542383,0.003249333,0.005271633,0.0005039854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049795703,0.000001964237,0.00003786479,0.000015429985,0.000001207844,0.00001920974,0.0022823252,0.000048221762,0.00004251264,0.9960188,0.0004956122,0.0010318048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011467703,0.000014274046,0.00035922063,0.0001440906,0.000006357108,0.000093809744,0.0031136144,0.0003568767,0.00023719328,0.8982844,0.097370446,0.000008279246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040042945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003990561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006926636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006809212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033153757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049404442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000945969","doi":"10.7202/801219ar","title":"Spinoza et la querelle du panthéisme","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Horizons philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.09793072106517499,"score_gpt":0.2942173299115268,"score_spread":0.19628660884635185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000945969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11823582,0.0088531375,0.015128695,0.024702538,0.00042498604,0.000022980881,0.000070310365,0.000058117763,0.8325035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96019334,0.0017051292,0.0009572701,0.00053745555,0.000064537395,0.000015548854,0.000013553483,0.000014023609,0.036499187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994273,0.00024527273,0.000011315746,0.00008728305,0.000106472304,0.00012227021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997907,0.00009278519,0.0000325148,0.000025939109,0.000031359607,0.00002662397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054047606,0.00022446175,0.00017627221,0.0005608,0.00285035,0.003231727,0.00029584512,0.0009654449,0.0073138066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007562404,0.00012400736,0.00015929998,0.0007193705,0.015572796,0.0024207053,0.0020592343,0.001798863,0.00039006857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032690632,7.359838e-7,0.00006599047,0.000011216662,6.8252825e-7,0.000012383394,0.001112682,0.000028796565,0.000035156503,0.9973145,0.00022510024,0.001189526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001903237,0.000024896526,0.0018233286,0.000100676334,0.000006530023,0.000103521474,0.005041792,0.000414202,0.00027921092,0.8069308,0.18524261,0.000013394086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008029358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015895087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008029358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004696553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00286899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034075975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001480041","doi":"10.1163/187226310x490052","title":"“ ’What’s Gone and What’s Past Help...’: Oakeshott and Strauss on Historical Explanation”","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Character (mathematics); History of political thought; Contextualism; Historiography; Political history; Intellectual history; Sociology; Political philosophy; History; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050484888816337815,"score_gpt":0.22595763326237414,"score_spread":0.17547274444603633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001480041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02696418,0.06949178,0.02041404,0.44569096,0.003663789,0.000044322183,0.00012358655,0.00007068623,0.43353668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.909522,0.023388324,0.0054562073,0.022364283,0.0024405369,0.000059518676,0.00007509687,0.00009526954,0.036598813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950353,0.0037287404,0.000096919895,0.0003260703,0.0005348912,0.00027821865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909452,0.006748291,0.00044302762,0.00047015309,0.0010579308,0.0003353934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059661428,0.00037297266,0.0004066518,0.0028298425,0.0062015797,0.0066913515,0.0015540628,0.0037398022,0.0037183103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01377672,0.00025932782,0.00033136358,0.0023864906,0.0374624,0.010137634,0.002674471,0.005824768,0.0005799789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059594086,0.0000044326534,0.00012383863,0.000020481551,0.0000019803833,0.000040340437,0.0081448285,0.0000968714,0.000010336408,0.9787049,0.009593735,0.0032521712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062257986,0.0000071101263,0.00037075215,0.00041318568,0.0000059137083,0.000075368574,0.006598166,0.0004267238,0.00008113057,0.7470295,0.24497095,0.0000150289015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038740277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044994865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038740277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01133388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005786929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08223349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002670507","doi":"","title":"The Myth of Primordialism in Cicero's Theory of Jus Gentium","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Cicero; Philosophy; Law; International law; Legal positivism; Natural law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Classics; Comparative law; History","score_opus":0.016383129729657442,"score_gpt":0.22271612617325506,"score_spread":0.20633299644359762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002670507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034468792,0.0049018,0.032409355,0.060712356,0.0009593927,0.000088470544,0.00005838992,0.00006669355,0.8663347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361876,0.0014000322,0.0091778105,0.011816469,0.00078455714,0.0002871525,0.000036803573,0.00007731951,0.040232155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930345,0.0032170708,0.00016441982,0.0010533736,0.0014819872,0.0010487278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970515,0.0013848398,0.00028180913,0.00039777026,0.00040094505,0.00048313648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006717566,0.00051800144,0.00063507806,0.0025027916,0.013703804,0.008412016,0.0016649361,0.0050059785,0.0030278552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071672522,0.00041279595,0.0009130216,0.0012381143,0.047389977,0.010698557,0.0074799294,0.007997867,0.0004823536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010113249,0.0000018055676,0.000019219004,0.0000023781613,3.820741e-7,0.000008148112,0.0008180144,0.000021812135,0.000005486329,0.998355,0.0005048511,0.00026191105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012255109,0.000007694178,0.00013632042,0.000030435389,0.000002580419,0.0000239207,0.00055964466,0.00027089953,0.000036890695,0.95305425,0.045856975,0.000008087665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012046831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008697712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013703804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010727842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067351577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077836275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003493662","doi":"10.7202/015699ar","title":"Introduction : Quand Sophia rencontre Arès","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.050865115117929995,"score_gpt":0.2789932814749954,"score_spread":0.22812816635706543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003493662","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012016142,0.05642477,0.0013458113,0.35497048,0.36862177,0.00011958888,0.0018273995,0.00040898166,0.21507965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018814703,0.021477422,0.0009524427,0.091537364,0.10968672,0.00018800839,0.0014145885,0.00047590715,0.75545275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981324,0.00038120925,0.00011526864,0.00047819165,0.000681029,0.00021180332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968368,0.0007212361,0.00024053665,0.000107997024,0.001757202,0.00033628236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014170288,0.0008818796,0.00078620814,0.001042902,0.0026687258,0.0034898277,0.00084462104,0.003509255,0.1062476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006491532,0.00036830758,0.0006235618,0.00091437274,0.0013833421,0.003232618,0.0025754021,0.0060970015,0.04607423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019882873,0.0000064564397,0.000083824656,0.00012276036,0.0000025064087,0.00003844575,0.00028529982,0.000012175282,0.000111882066,0.008071261,0.981612,0.009633623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017496916,0.0000060760713,0.0002566945,0.00016134464,0.0000014688185,0.000043720604,0.000118611555,0.000008053587,0.00003482693,0.00065717835,0.99870586,0.000004418097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011266944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0142141245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027458824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023860137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35543364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006602336","doi":"10.1177/000842980002900310","title":"Comptes rendus / Reviews of books: Leo Strauss and the American Right Shadia B. Drury New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997. xiii + 239 p","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.1310106039470585,"score_gpt":0.3351574538691039,"score_spread":0.2041468499220454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006602336","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005070028,0.7686571,0.0003589794,0.021588579,0.011494442,0.000014759408,0.00072670216,0.00011276705,0.19653966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008043593,0.41818315,0.00060048874,0.0039400924,0.0060933665,0.00004158393,0.00056412764,0.0002023243,0.5623313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965835,0.000050731665,0.000028264496,0.00005301656,0.00018364798,0.000026005644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904996,0.00029539023,0.00008419424,0.00004751511,0.0003705893,0.00015235404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045157547,0.0011881064,0.00079610606,0.003348324,0.0014861256,0.0027212985,0.0007078319,0.0011035274,0.13350163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018308357,0.0004116999,0.00025705915,0.0048902505,0.0018366352,0.0029967,0.0012330812,0.0019536307,0.06553828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009605296,0.0000068060845,0.00009441346,0.00022633625,0.000002346031,0.00001863126,0.00021615991,0.00003215723,0.000049545764,0.0046531404,0.9389117,0.055779167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017292643,0.000002399857,0.00044347596,0.00041292218,0.0000017790769,0.000036065947,0.00017345647,0.0000097585225,0.000016924592,0.0014562069,0.997442,0.0000032376468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02548934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07486036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13350163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021511384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031952686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44660747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007124940","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2011.623888","title":"Practical Paths in Philosophy: Observations on the 1785-6 Spinoza Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intellectual History Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Work (physics); Sociology; Social science; Political science; Art history; History; Engineering; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4561879934348054,"score_gpt":0.3053343209689476,"score_spread":0.15085367246585785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007124940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17482583,0.016122412,0.0024337557,0.06088489,0.00040259387,0.000029137993,0.0000767495,0.00003772405,0.74518687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805962,0.002102748,0.00033571178,0.0018717814,0.00015798217,0.00002144086,0.000020929787,0.000027180768,0.014866197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745613,0.0015033454,0.00006423425,0.00023431846,0.00044103683,0.00030092133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608445,0.002695409,0.000297297,0.00023455232,0.0004980279,0.00019027188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004994951,0.00016587137,0.00031055513,0.0018817917,0.00841371,0.0049381657,0.0006323351,0.0022967686,0.0069608544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008878146,0.00018277658,0.0001941765,0.002304042,0.021081565,0.004564952,0.003160366,0.0029939914,0.00046780068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001886909,0.0000056662734,0.00026248666,0.00002880553,0.0000018141183,0.00009629593,0.04066561,0.00004737933,0.000040658313,0.9463374,0.006458431,0.006036566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004865724,0.000015794601,0.003871298,0.00033263816,0.000008236367,0.00019166672,0.043779645,0.00023282488,0.0001608935,0.33389536,0.6174456,0.00001746688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017576052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017187942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017576052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009688837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031297586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07029778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007174447","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2004","title":"Two logics of authority in modern law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Epistemology; Relation (database); Identification (biology); Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Public law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0313217026405304,"score_gpt":0.2253329696495683,"score_spread":0.19401126700903792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007174447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06788121,0.009734782,0.19598617,0.062395707,0.000569421,0.00006966443,0.000169087,0.00018412864,0.66300994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657773,0.0011284722,0.015733533,0.0017256001,0.00036716188,0.000081007354,0.000041194504,0.00003298928,0.015112823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532807,0.002246155,0.0001996539,0.00058041216,0.0011337737,0.0005120119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534273,0.0025799193,0.0004847363,0.0005086202,0.00047426933,0.0006098061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005223584,0.0003194983,0.00044255986,0.0019311493,0.0037890736,0.009519311,0.0009780709,0.0029370442,0.00438717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062712454,0.00037539905,0.00063543406,0.0016457253,0.04164118,0.013152638,0.004006853,0.003774906,0.0005289254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001667035,0.0000012539882,0.000014456426,0.0000024095673,2.5045773e-7,0.0000032637313,0.00028014666,0.00003090889,0.000007881042,0.999114,0.00012403722,0.000419769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010821136,0.0000047419985,0.000094035706,0.00001905473,0.0000019911115,0.00002512858,0.00038968783,0.00048905105,0.00005262745,0.9892119,0.00969484,0.0000061456085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005111241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039010677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009918028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009918028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038125827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07196069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010356237","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0008","title":"Spinoza and Hume on Religion as a Natural Phenomenon","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Naturalism; Natural (archaeology); Religiosity; Passion; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; History","score_opus":0.10524167508287262,"score_gpt":0.32161529738013,"score_spread":0.21637362229725737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010356237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09719987,0.053264838,0.021726815,0.15114759,0.001725507,0.000060840455,0.00012336377,0.00005816415,0.6746929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95042574,0.008127321,0.004257583,0.011853448,0.0008331897,0.00006055762,0.00002567489,0.00002266307,0.024393788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988294,0.00073090405,0.000023145503,0.00013500902,0.00015832443,0.00012317933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871314,0.00087467534,0.00009398239,0.00008192015,0.00011930503,0.000117014526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016647689,0.000293513,0.00033485144,0.0013076962,0.003957773,0.0035285386,0.0004529611,0.002213378,0.0024787195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001856011,0.00012511565,0.00027536496,0.000797944,0.033012316,0.004917736,0.0021785465,0.002886239,0.00028549318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006127665,0.000006217049,0.00013510905,0.000013434077,0.0000017308386,0.000028950853,0.0022030354,0.000041173444,0.000026723581,0.9944179,0.0013841435,0.0017355146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011509541,0.000012777278,0.0006254685,0.000069121554,0.0000033346498,0.00005852272,0.0017922092,0.00015930716,0.00008031396,0.93389124,0.06328792,0.000008263159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047157006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004708442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047157006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023644317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016022674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01715517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010792735","doi":"10.1080/00071773.2014.915645","title":"The Potentiality of the Archaic: Spinoza and the Chinese","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fordham University; University of Guelph; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011773640891374506,"score_gpt":0.21802811577080045,"score_spread":0.20625447487942594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010792735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4836417,0.010469235,0.001318644,0.025510143,0.0004760315,0.000029760058,0.00017996453,0.000047524067,0.47832686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877572,0.0015582012,0.00014828921,0.0005608446,0.000060376977,0.000009058546,0.000022751778,0.000011523159,0.009871718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937326,0.00022582471,0.000023500907,0.000095043615,0.00012257918,0.00015982536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999493,0.00019117807,0.000056326604,0.000084331885,0.000082642655,0.00009237655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009783799,0.0003083381,0.0002582449,0.0011727829,0.0074118557,0.005977505,0.00042632467,0.00072228827,0.003505072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010536149,0.00013772685,0.00011884461,0.002658636,0.018219369,0.0034321572,0.0018727542,0.001723449,0.00020780382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007825701,0.000008001382,0.0021602798,0.00012649913,0.0000107335845,0.0003692951,0.15105511,0.00007219805,0.0004780716,0.8310802,0.0031468028,0.011414456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000636776,0.000108952685,0.03586984,0.0006003927,0.000096234806,0.00061394955,0.34990323,0.0007840629,0.0017530608,0.15740943,0.4526828,0.0001142967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15167674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18301985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15167674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007625485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057596816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30158776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016883202","doi":"10.7202/008856ar","title":"Le retour de la philosophie politique","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07513906368663542,"score_gpt":0.38207764529273724,"score_spread":0.3069385816061018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016883202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008905881,0.03287973,0.03347569,0.34175876,0.0063063707,0.00003657843,0.00013965667,0.0001602496,0.5763372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.540676,0.03203595,0.012467489,0.059892703,0.012773217,0.00022621297,0.0001431891,0.0004496067,0.34133562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355114,0.0031417876,0.00013634098,0.0011115519,0.0015677591,0.00049139356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700195,0.0016583175,0.00019853025,0.0004485693,0.00043992547,0.00025274843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043429798,0.00068392296,0.00051923905,0.0013301274,0.0051877834,0.013234637,0.001020686,0.004925985,0.011765234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005721063,0.00050383795,0.0007676028,0.0014162988,0.030468773,0.012728555,0.0051012244,0.013984171,0.0028047909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005594867,0.0000032653936,0.000062021834,0.000023695617,0.0000027904166,0.000014903733,0.0009144627,0.0000640273,0.00007091152,0.9897584,0.0060151126,0.0030648445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009788066,0.00001535412,0.00030137863,0.00017887003,0.0000058725896,0.00008073022,0.0010234495,0.00029480024,0.00014188686,0.5720385,0.42589703,0.000012386638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065271207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004979181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013234637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009436597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066233473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06846762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021556084","doi":"10.7202/1029154ar","title":"Aristote, Leo Strauss et le droit naturel","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08601615018791071,"score_gpt":0.30067169376253394,"score_spread":0.21465554357462324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021556084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03734267,0.029080316,0.017869493,0.06706158,0.0023137708,0.000026759011,0.00006534988,0.00005439366,0.84618574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703646,0.008746447,0.0033250556,0.008043163,0.0012709813,0.00004939655,0.000033585857,0.000091760194,0.10807499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770796,0.0011631333,0.0000497567,0.00023243284,0.000583023,0.00026373504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884355,0.00070569525,0.00008640395,0.00009354851,0.00018109223,0.000089597066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018726981,0.0003773126,0.0004020814,0.0013219115,0.0047897496,0.005685268,0.0005129962,0.002818765,0.0033670943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032612851,0.0001721587,0.00031071357,0.00097083964,0.020881774,0.0041497615,0.0019807552,0.004853376,0.00078170194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050207977,0.0000016499771,0.000039441533,0.000008974044,0.000001209177,0.000015120515,0.002486075,0.000024219129,0.000028015138,0.9937973,0.0019029449,0.0016899441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011240886,0.00001803474,0.00042032177,0.00013719733,0.000007416874,0.00008707928,0.0038711962,0.00018566429,0.0002885041,0.65640074,0.33855706,0.000015488064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014384412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022095798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014384412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005168447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003991165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037499905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028411964","doi":"10.1017/s0364009411000250","title":"Moira Gatens, ed. Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009, xiv, 239 pp.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Gerontology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06469914669109808,"score_gpt":0.2563758547214624,"score_spread":0.19167670803036432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028411964","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036280855,0.9503238,0.00035530157,0.021946086,0.0026539706,0.0000047494473,0.00008338041,0.000021768741,0.02424812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02132483,0.88303375,0.0015458213,0.007710364,0.0050891945,0.000051373554,0.00016126089,0.00010195875,0.08098151],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993407,0.0002632708,0.000032894088,0.000082874474,0.00022441396,0.00005580429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991689,0.0004924611,0.000060499915,0.000032216405,0.00017842268,0.000067484674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013757573,0.0010078215,0.0007338424,0.0028321715,0.003052225,0.0024703883,0.0010277501,0.0018248821,0.01825488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022442683,0.0007101992,0.0004438357,0.0026693246,0.0036867268,0.0050682006,0.00089028315,0.002325717,0.0054168124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056139892,0.000018625833,0.00036414943,0.0006689409,0.000013514898,0.00016635559,0.0038832608,0.00008130729,0.00015005156,0.061872166,0.81329024,0.11943523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059595027,0.000005240098,0.0010528533,0.00088762515,0.00000504408,0.00021489555,0.0015583514,0.000023974097,0.00008013719,0.014361445,0.98179793,0.0000065006557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024031997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06884972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024031997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031014537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003325181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061068654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030041592","doi":"10.1590/s0101-31732007000200017","title":"Reflexões sobre a obra que o Sr. Hobbes publicou em inglês, sobre a liberdade, a necessidade e o acaso","year":2007,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Trans/Form/Ação","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Open Text (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Reflex; Medicine; Anesthesia","score_opus":0.05661300812090786,"score_gpt":0.29303258688162803,"score_spread":0.23641957876072017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030041592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034359913,0.024008267,0.0031397708,0.194339,0.004658518,0.000026942975,0.000081710496,0.00006352463,0.73932236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79489356,0.0171895,0.0013257918,0.02332432,0.003184476,0.000049355487,0.000053072094,0.00014238837,0.15983754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954277,0.002665915,0.00012420332,0.00052478985,0.0008613865,0.00039593878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518126,0.0031640166,0.00044932,0.00033262797,0.00050880597,0.00036392457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058500883,0.00053475477,0.00031939262,0.0010607606,0.009596799,0.010353996,0.0006198856,0.0039833877,0.011176282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008378936,0.00024595106,0.00022905397,0.0015495096,0.028270893,0.0067098956,0.004289644,0.005593462,0.0016194206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002151511,0.000009513425,0.0002884934,0.000082410115,0.000004431066,0.00015335628,0.07036325,0.000023176155,0.0003005442,0.89367527,0.028641453,0.0064365324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007966402,0.000022085778,0.0013577212,0.0005292672,0.000009016164,0.00027320784,0.08669133,0.000065548375,0.00062082714,0.11949247,0.7909103,0.00002026334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006991563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017823905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011176282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004968342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034890817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037388384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033741841","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2014.949955","title":"The First Modern Jew: Spinoza and the History of an Image","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art; Image (mathematics); Art history; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024859978019838583,"score_gpt":0.20555961534794773,"score_spread":0.18069963732810915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033741841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07906059,0.014051174,0.0015239246,0.030113881,0.0014155222,0.000018735565,0.0000590679,0.000060292623,0.87369674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87356746,0.0033980417,0.00079932535,0.004231035,0.0004565839,0.000014231154,0.000026329695,0.00012709311,0.11737983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922025,0.00023819326,0.000022272407,0.00013746286,0.00015052891,0.00023123102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939823,0.00023071795,0.000057241705,0.00007815616,0.000117172545,0.00011841565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018322478,0.00028077577,0.00025596787,0.0014989489,0.010255153,0.009485928,0.00036964653,0.002060644,0.013480218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002093415,0.0002518273,0.00016882234,0.001309688,0.026054528,0.005950894,0.0024021012,0.0053119482,0.0008264064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003782545,0.000018020311,0.00027697335,0.000024458424,0.0000029824805,0.000073420735,0.022431795,0.000019380912,0.00014366228,0.9598858,0.007538789,0.009546937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003308016,0.000040408042,0.002674159,0.00028162063,0.000010670306,0.00023151284,0.020384843,0.000093088,0.00045504892,0.09756031,0.87820345,0.00003175071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026951713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06135004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026951713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009789162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002390605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07102573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034021357","doi":"10.1017/s0008423913000930","title":"Machiavel et la vertu intellectuelle de prudence : étude du chapitre XXV du Prince*","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Humanities; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.020946491022394244,"score_gpt":0.24782467904918928,"score_spread":0.22687818802679505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034021357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58805186,0.03948776,0.003482869,0.026015295,0.00038360365,0.00009009818,0.000092056755,0.000017591303,0.34237885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96786946,0.0074742725,0.00044132015,0.0007926357,0.00014631556,0.000052294457,0.000022025008,0.000008364248,0.023193307],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999127,0.0005196478,0.00002541649,0.000072612565,0.00014718264,0.000108182394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854195,0.0009823996,0.00021220287,0.000058536887,0.00011466552,0.000090270965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011354835,0.00029634958,0.00028490013,0.0008789729,0.0047472427,0.004594557,0.00043932334,0.001293904,0.003003182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017751432,0.00018452661,0.00019196796,0.0009144181,0.00988146,0.0021312088,0.002494844,0.0028914225,0.0002256305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016637607,0.000033033037,0.003349559,0.00028303763,0.000007769748,0.0006712071,0.51605666,0.00017051797,0.00024397613,0.4631488,0.0035626907,0.0124561535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009031293,0.00014902666,0.027817298,0.0019282752,0.000015576145,0.0010031622,0.4361732,0.0006687592,0.00065410463,0.07446001,0.45708337,0.000038226084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007572377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009481372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007572377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002274183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020161432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016500473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037984238","doi":"10.1353/hph.2006.0045","title":"Spinoza's Account of Akrasia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the history of philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Passion; Virtue; Philosophy; Epistemology; Happiness; Action (physics); Power (physics); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03796554176682566,"score_gpt":0.21047191725186712,"score_spread":0.17250637548504147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037984238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020393724,0.004689502,0.019730585,0.026857102,0.00061585463,0.00002769471,0.00013427692,0.00011708068,0.9274343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91674256,0.001477066,0.004317587,0.004805059,0.00045384787,0.00007503771,0.00005929227,0.0000802001,0.071989365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846613,0.0005673086,0.00006579724,0.0003379136,0.0002627684,0.00030000875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933225,0.0002601193,0.00007449004,0.00010962983,0.00014955967,0.000074030555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013537955,0.00041942095,0.0003292255,0.001152442,0.005079006,0.006807016,0.000868532,0.002616164,0.0068518952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00175661,0.00020931753,0.00071980665,0.0010409455,0.015266253,0.007239409,0.002334766,0.003593886,0.0010377472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020694677,0.0000015667772,0.000020284897,0.000004358996,6.973588e-7,0.000009702477,0.00040208956,0.000024801011,0.000009550715,0.99829024,0.0008425672,0.0003920028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000982456,0.0000057568645,0.00016575122,0.000022913044,0.000006208902,0.000074705655,0.00055031676,0.00036141026,0.00006610909,0.92121977,0.07750984,0.0000074190375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008016414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007496941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008016414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005531242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022278598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040132105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038211718","doi":"10.7202/1026959ar","title":"Le positivisme en droit international : fondement épistémologique d’un paradigme mécaniciste","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.013674435553138216,"score_gpt":0.22171312789261002,"score_spread":0.2080386923394718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038211718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03560771,0.012531351,0.07155049,0.05034061,0.00086933473,0.000028879196,0.00011155503,0.00007264801,0.8288874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92482096,0.0065700933,0.010029888,0.0031446395,0.00090222334,0.00013258036,0.00008623648,0.00017494918,0.05413839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967449,0.0016700206,0.00008053108,0.00046164534,0.000658525,0.0003844173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777406,0.0012106294,0.0001783868,0.00034712924,0.00029636655,0.00019334254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038934224,0.0005370631,0.0004766442,0.0020434132,0.004287011,0.009834428,0.0010419432,0.0030803694,0.0062749935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038073217,0.0003479739,0.00056346745,0.002214405,0.03476351,0.012564983,0.0046071904,0.0060076606,0.0008737835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016788871,0.0000010560764,0.000031130723,0.000005753762,4.974594e-7,0.0000063345674,0.0011455726,0.000027658649,0.000018487926,0.9978138,0.00030846524,0.0006395231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006584506,0.000010088211,0.00029756068,0.00009424996,0.0000045595275,0.000062735766,0.0031866506,0.0004274099,0.00018402879,0.910861,0.08485436,0.000010683286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008543394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061699506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009834428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007934255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051638177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057567358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041384037","doi":"10.1353/ecf.2012.0059","title":"Cosmopolitans, Slaves, and the Global Market in Voltaire's Candide, ou l'optimisme","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Colonialism; Context (archaeology); History; Political science; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.01998555524830719,"score_gpt":0.234021248605599,"score_spread":0.2140356933572918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041384037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34728348,0.03487166,0.0044105477,0.08936019,0.00069810357,0.000032540727,0.0000423606,0.000024878393,0.52327627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701827,0.0022223983,0.0004931812,0.0022090983,0.00012128311,0.000015714753,0.0000048976617,0.00000869523,0.024741862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994785,0.00032489357,0.0000062388804,0.000055061842,0.00005744603,0.000077910896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969137,0.00021704113,0.00002815534,0.000013990789,0.00001647859,0.000033056574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006321444,0.00021674215,0.00015968642,0.0004772182,0.0057290513,0.004230177,0.00025835622,0.002165222,0.001261679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012465923,0.00011288486,0.00011022477,0.000507497,0.017897503,0.0025694282,0.0018516999,0.0024021377,0.00009742929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017787821,0.000010453292,0.00038439492,0.000014364549,0.0000014773896,0.0002435339,0.07345572,0.00007999457,0.00012573744,0.9182592,0.0041579856,0.0032493277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002707985,0.000036930414,0.0032216476,0.00030198626,0.000007947844,0.00069021055,0.082190886,0.00044898,0.0004585686,0.29220387,0.6203857,0.000026190757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008368835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014194494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008368835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029220297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008682076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021200895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042432827","doi":"10.1353/hph.2012.0068","title":"Eve’s Perfection: Spinoza on Sexual (In)Equality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the history of philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Virtue; Perfection; Philosophy; Portrait; Politics; Epistemology; Law; History; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.11277914267666672,"score_gpt":0.2615100151486781,"score_spread":0.1487308724720114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042432827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067965634,0.0054406323,0.009959431,0.06518587,0.0012090063,0.000017011675,0.000035403373,0.000023172242,0.8501638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473673,0.0012626732,0.00080087286,0.0054437416,0.0002460712,0.000017078526,0.000009799519,0.000025695916,0.04482673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809474,0.0009417153,0.00003802079,0.0001725971,0.00037965734,0.00037314728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993839,0.00033389858,0.000047692552,0.00008092423,0.00007296044,0.00008070165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022571995,0.00020921657,0.00033031392,0.00046277005,0.0048257834,0.005560172,0.00036552592,0.0016956691,0.0031536943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299036,0.00015063232,0.00022043416,0.00035909694,0.025069216,0.005666903,0.0038690805,0.00460672,0.00031377256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062770696,0.000002431971,0.00007158504,0.000004572182,7.152997e-7,0.000024489318,0.002235929,0.000020017702,0.000027282525,0.9949269,0.0011452656,0.001534441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014023034,0.000024304865,0.00063574815,0.00011822478,0.000006668507,0.00014791888,0.0073791696,0.00020529356,0.00036971064,0.75127405,0.2398106,0.000014294758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038482063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050344197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005560172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021359802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016326996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0154976845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044805581","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905399999","title":"Leo Strauss, Max Weber, And The Scientific Study Of Politics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State (computer science); Sociology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Economic history; Philosophy; Law; History","score_opus":0.043212880990049336,"score_gpt":0.2598220549569399,"score_spread":0.21660917396689056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044805581","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024108202,0.6583991,0.0033889376,0.21652155,0.0022609083,0.000024986573,0.0001507832,0.00005165034,0.116791375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.227433,0.5589907,0.007849955,0.050810426,0.016545745,0.00024534934,0.00021876938,0.00020118873,0.13770495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795985,0.001017419,0.000087489665,0.00021287835,0.0005668679,0.00015555542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975134,0.0018193199,0.00024478463,0.00008545684,0.00022220593,0.00011471423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002302667,0.0010168392,0.0004748767,0.003790121,0.0039405487,0.0051684324,0.00085122033,0.0034843232,0.005269246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006064396,0.00063066976,0.0003023798,0.0047316714,0.01286689,0.011821679,0.0016819863,0.0032058186,0.0015528891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028976343,0.000015388736,0.00025918294,0.00013833442,0.0000053984727,0.00006708555,0.0024163588,0.00018878072,0.0000662988,0.7975183,0.1776201,0.021675717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010356395,0.000009363025,0.0005340007,0.00042330564,0.000004301448,0.00009493892,0.0009726855,0.00011800419,0.000109479835,0.5036979,0.4940073,0.00001839773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016076146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025594564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016076146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063261995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005110111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045899987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044829412","doi":"10.7202/009562ar","title":"Spinoza et le problème juif de la théodicée","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.23263966682601897,"score_gpt":0.34220988498020916,"score_spread":0.10957021815419019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044829412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042818017,0.011347624,0.027658911,0.055777963,0.0014072246,0.00004436679,0.000100772995,0.00007241495,0.8607728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87683594,0.0037289409,0.0050548143,0.0041669505,0.0004899332,0.00006719382,0.000044271244,0.000086216634,0.10952581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737096,0.0010789896,0.000104456594,0.00047455396,0.000515174,0.0004557845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983247,0.00078853784,0.00015872355,0.00022321277,0.0003070628,0.00019778988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003326367,0.0004782884,0.0005372331,0.0017500604,0.009753958,0.011246635,0.00091590954,0.0023828084,0.009740762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041065793,0.00031333853,0.0005783376,0.0014112432,0.0332602,0.008583432,0.0043112133,0.0057445816,0.00091503083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055827554,0.000002224957,0.00005380521,0.000012841886,0.0000014454537,0.00001190067,0.0020533386,0.000016338705,0.000026940104,0.9954281,0.00074526627,0.0016421851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019115632,0.000014902738,0.0004290632,0.000121212666,0.000009339664,0.00008977958,0.0059436914,0.00023222802,0.00024096594,0.8005453,0.19233847,0.000015971542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017015742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02883632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017015742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008544657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067744437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061996102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048537747","doi":"10.7202/009568ar","title":"Sens et vérité chez Clauberg et Spinoza","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Hermeneutics; Theology","score_opus":0.29320958990564633,"score_gpt":0.34545302747690626,"score_spread":0.05224343757125993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048537747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21124382,0.013805368,0.004976793,0.01970712,0.0009948594,0.00002215055,0.000049543836,0.00007033854,0.74913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95577645,0.001186592,0.0006929892,0.0010808134,0.00008177971,0.000011482508,0.000010036831,0.000024596393,0.041135285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900585,0.0003489234,0.000027747259,0.00014471186,0.00020552681,0.00026723815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996145,0.00017924361,0.000056481924,0.000045758297,0.000050453462,0.00005357264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013436824,0.0003120575,0.00030756652,0.00083506166,0.0075775348,0.00662507,0.0003090111,0.0015412208,0.0038514207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013893606,0.00016373895,0.00018610754,0.0011022714,0.019597808,0.0029249971,0.0028786121,0.0031853877,0.00028441922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015647598,0.0000043862738,0.0002471865,0.000016963615,0.0000012546229,0.00009062109,0.035809264,0.000026034339,0.00020850931,0.95678097,0.0009993935,0.0057996474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032352913,0.000054553515,0.005245438,0.00029405038,0.000022275202,0.00043831658,0.0569084,0.0002968951,0.0010753212,0.35353988,0.5820466,0.000045873345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03145545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03145545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060396167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030741873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0625447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050377973","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0284","title":"The Idea of Chivalry in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Case of David Hume","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chivalry; Enlightenment; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Ideology; Scottish Enlightenment; Civilization; Novelty; Romance; Age of Enlightenment; Ridiculous; Epistemology; Literature; History; Art; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.08939222186533352,"score_gpt":0.32492915472400846,"score_spread":0.23553693285867494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050377973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39705434,0.012260211,0.00381738,0.12041402,0.000983814,0.000040213155,0.00002819493,0.00004694844,0.46535492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98271704,0.0005493442,0.00018037338,0.0046522636,0.00009700237,0.0000053774156,0.000002041315,0.00001120631,0.011785408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416006,0.0038455585,0.000057846544,0.00033703467,0.00042112646,0.0011784708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968093,0.0019853287,0.00025332792,0.00017668787,0.00026143526,0.0005138864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057796957,0.0003527008,0.00036769646,0.0010432433,0.022315016,0.008058148,0.0012269586,0.0074634156,0.0023738015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051507363,0.00032173365,0.00026492777,0.00083987677,0.07138945,0.0050589447,0.0054887044,0.0061723576,0.00032488714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036685546,0.000022169275,0.000533866,0.000030001323,0.00000601215,0.0011990467,0.26337707,0.000084509025,0.00015971305,0.7219368,0.00835126,0.0042628604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051788124,0.00008795237,0.0016606619,0.00032004798,0.000016474713,0.0013772281,0.2259585,0.0003811582,0.0005931366,0.17448393,0.59497714,0.00009194099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040200446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053191137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040200446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009038063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038651696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07993293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050909628","doi":"10.1558/ccp.v2i2.211","title":"Time, Duration and Eternity in Spinoza","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and Continental Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Eternity; Duration (music); Philosophy; Epistemology; Power (physics); Literature; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.04702565201964957,"score_gpt":0.26258843222291495,"score_spread":0.2155627802032654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050909628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19191222,0.013875955,0.03628601,0.013040936,0.0006351242,0.000038496248,0.00007078167,0.000054874257,0.74408555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830481,0.0015364484,0.0018685872,0.00041341787,0.00007640129,0.000020351099,0.000012943819,0.000014238337,0.013009385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994205,0.00029629417,0.000022759828,0.000068273854,0.00008424427,0.00010793312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944323,0.0002839041,0.00007672575,0.000060546947,0.00006824201,0.0000672877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001017079,0.0002265905,0.00022526766,0.00093614275,0.0036300782,0.004273886,0.0004626929,0.0007855214,0.002759333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012112407,0.000118992364,0.00031349776,0.0007784609,0.016568888,0.0047997953,0.0030250666,0.0016392096,0.00021149681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006139914,0.000002950664,0.00011861757,0.000007855047,0.000001114004,0.000020532889,0.003072977,0.00004481764,0.00004706354,0.99537045,0.00013714551,0.0011703679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015211999,0.000024349425,0.001358201,0.000068766596,0.000013035906,0.00014751493,0.008462156,0.00043289954,0.0003221448,0.88008124,0.109056,0.000018542181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00625556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005831078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00625556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032487973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001053614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02357179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054623593","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778536","title":"Recognizing Rights: Hobbes on the Authority of Mothers and Conquerors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Victory; Law; Sovereignty; Political science; State of nature; Politics; Meaning (existential); Natural law; State (computer science); Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.062192508595868376,"score_gpt":0.2545680955257517,"score_spread":0.19237558692988332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054623593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021360025,0.010679733,0.011457222,0.08045366,0.0010293961,0.000030595056,0.000019668667,0.000022262431,0.87494755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911977,0.004818575,0.002794652,0.0095014265,0.0010008567,0.00010181601,0.000014427478,0.00005346989,0.069737755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938174,0.0039752745,0.00010550132,0.0005755581,0.0008633532,0.000662894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969164,0.0022072133,0.00017203118,0.0001835947,0.00026901957,0.00025159412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008118251,0.00046655422,0.00046701054,0.0011743843,0.010312684,0.008175686,0.0007604622,0.0048540556,0.0036541445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007061144,0.00030560084,0.00029148397,0.0006397845,0.06530076,0.0110815,0.004227238,0.0059822807,0.00075929455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025367497,0.0000016584263,0.000019504909,0.0000027496324,3.3034738e-7,0.000019119716,0.004944248,0.000017917171,0.000014139763,0.9933669,0.00077747344,0.00083349936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012615505,0.000012349444,0.00015917355,0.00011978392,0.0000032413047,0.00004789171,0.005591401,0.00012297035,0.0001206402,0.8490399,0.1447606,0.0000093359595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012331128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009094374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012331128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009356752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046278858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06788832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055815678","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0651","title":"Hume's Two Definitions: The Procedural Interpretation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Natural kind; Computer science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.35447163198994414,"score_gpt":0.3211626901955673,"score_spread":0.03330894179437682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055815678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015332437,0.0064271092,0.39648357,0.11062601,0.0018353823,0.00016866453,0.00030111003,0.00024221075,0.4685835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86064476,0.0025814143,0.08224455,0.018105855,0.001950653,0.00093848706,0.00022661086,0.00040377647,0.032903943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976996,0.014452061,0.0007693716,0.0023679312,0.0041951058,0.0012194485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869307,0.007991855,0.0008128018,0.0020608443,0.0017358768,0.00046792682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01572537,0.0009920798,0.0011030041,0.0031393138,0.0042763543,0.009400606,0.0036624554,0.0075869258,0.0042640897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02434639,0.00075991784,0.0012497148,0.0021274802,0.06408322,0.018040834,0.0065713525,0.011606111,0.00080887054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037733498,0.0000028691352,0.000021896294,0.0000076757,0.0000017847108,0.0000071819522,0.0011382502,0.000029968212,0.000013912796,0.9974318,0.000591216,0.000749779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011276647,0.000005814427,0.000079406636,0.000053651434,0.0000039163738,0.000030109968,0.00059583894,0.00025970343,0.00008874524,0.9751111,0.02375181,0.00000861938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032680826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00265378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01572537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058181663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005332633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08316469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058374580","doi":"10.1017/s1479244313000012","title":"PUBLICITY, PRIVACY, AND RELIGIOUS TOLERATION IN HOBBES'S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Worship; Publicity; Law; Public sphere; Coercion (linguistics); Separation of church and state; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04619380730988953,"score_gpt":0.20448239299888965,"score_spread":0.15828858568900012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058374580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35262987,0.004753715,0.007910443,0.020399285,0.00026088208,0.000025137258,0.00002099974,0.000031142252,0.61396855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935375,0.00017038,0.00024295687,0.00037654812,0.00005598687,0.0000061060828,0.0000023353325,0.0000096923395,0.005598495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985306,0.0009535462,0.000032110398,0.00015720192,0.00010253918,0.00022399992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909616,0.0005176521,0.00010974492,0.00011106461,0.00006876548,0.00009673435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026663,0.00013459932,0.00017020071,0.00053867523,0.005848577,0.008223538,0.00041549577,0.0015821289,0.0018557028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002128966,0.00023029189,0.0001610696,0.00044570354,0.038552027,0.004085215,0.002736126,0.0025654593,0.00015607028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014667458,0.000008746387,0.00020742658,0.0000071006243,0.0000015309357,0.000054813543,0.033813655,0.00005154228,0.00008640948,0.963589,0.0003930434,0.0017721388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037742295,0.000052609335,0.0029201235,0.00013317852,0.000013327792,0.00023663198,0.036420528,0.00052368786,0.00091085065,0.80786574,0.15085031,0.00003524591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065677916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009543633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008223538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047678812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015140682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034593523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062869291","doi":"10.1163/18750257-02601005","title":"Thomas Hobbes, Heresy, and the Theological Project of Leviathan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hobbes Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Heresy; Toleration; Orthodoxy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Politics; Theology; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.12298078961945108,"score_gpt":0.2944579255538886,"score_spread":0.17147713593443753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062869291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13201414,0.067154944,0.0041698553,0.11654124,0.0021521877,0.000019173925,0.000050542054,0.000053565724,0.6778444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94021505,0.0071462835,0.00065289834,0.0030113042,0.0009020762,0.000023965295,0.000015406189,0.000040460392,0.047992513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985827,0.0010207478,0.000019843576,0.000076114135,0.0001358712,0.00016468929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935335,0.00040529133,0.00006568723,0.000034824196,0.000046333244,0.000094561736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001216092,0.00024525254,0.00020313391,0.0009985194,0.0077353814,0.0051706736,0.0004361086,0.0014684015,0.003944869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016149514,0.00011361802,0.000107214735,0.000782653,0.02456542,0.0025040824,0.0018917775,0.0023385242,0.00045584072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020592586,0.000010403083,0.0002303483,0.00004050003,0.000002672515,0.00010985336,0.045870934,0.000039809747,0.00017462649,0.94007397,0.007596556,0.005829813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012496581,0.00004026359,0.0017069242,0.00044558384,0.0000061788746,0.00020407795,0.05401526,0.00016205612,0.00052947126,0.28210607,0.6607485,0.00002326776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009277625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018543271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009277625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046752165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018570723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033921182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065711826","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2012.679779","title":"Hume and Ancient Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Literature; Ancient philosophy; Classics; History; Art","score_opus":0.0851335377081105,"score_gpt":0.24956637360070438,"score_spread":0.1644328358925939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065711826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042398285,0.115819454,0.0058124703,0.09011226,0.0022449114,0.000019692166,0.000064594795,0.000069284964,0.74345905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.864473,0.026553197,0.0020324918,0.017850276,0.0023003074,0.000023906276,0.00003068552,0.00005661155,0.08667955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983216,0.0010780853,0.000032270604,0.00012451425,0.00027564142,0.00016793027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985544,0.0010079589,0.00009536853,0.00008563704,0.0001534472,0.000103191545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019855893,0.0002714746,0.00025464589,0.0014911288,0.0053660264,0.0036006817,0.00045983706,0.0023393624,0.0046088723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026978294,0.00013494257,0.00018834615,0.0010976556,0.029221237,0.0031277167,0.0021464345,0.0028677776,0.00089056994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012242943,0.0000050631725,0.00011710223,0.00003960847,0.0000030554047,0.00005400104,0.0107694045,0.00007660579,0.000038711754,0.9742509,0.0073480327,0.0072853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009530232,0.000018603707,0.0005577683,0.00028961335,0.000003260735,0.00020001749,0.0043265424,0.00013286124,0.00013453368,0.4950538,0.49926236,0.00001116404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038089405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004285257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053660264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042432654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019644604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03078723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065837513","doi":"10.7202/1018604ar","title":"Coleridge’s Ecumenical Spinoza1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Metaphysics; Ambivalence; Denial; Philosophy; Christianity; Subject (documents); Object (grammar); Epistemology; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.02863837462292727,"score_gpt":0.2063656493511135,"score_spread":0.17772727472818625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065837513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04587219,0.019066706,0.004021992,0.053997997,0.0018659014,0.00005753308,0.00019682536,0.0001096832,0.87481123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7158823,0.005760336,0.0022360377,0.010824209,0.00070152816,0.00009179546,0.00007947881,0.000118733486,0.26430565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927396,0.0002035775,0.000023478904,0.00014984662,0.00021952733,0.00012964063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987607,0.0005424124,0.00013094112,0.00012460302,0.00030665452,0.0001346368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007414508,0.00037922617,0.00022120771,0.0013021203,0.0058917673,0.004424104,0.00039558535,0.0013591239,0.0069096633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035208764,0.0001774432,0.00013186532,0.0011203683,0.010336447,0.0025327203,0.0021172855,0.0027700064,0.0007939311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055418208,0.000012253284,0.0010962824,0.00012640636,0.000003527576,0.00026705515,0.04309829,0.000040872375,0.00028413007,0.8371877,0.09384584,0.023982262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005617723,0.0000073927145,0.001183323,0.00020949122,0.000002954246,0.0001725591,0.0057178773,0.00005886473,0.00018598272,0.018422745,0.9740242,0.000008982398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029464267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065033875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029464267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043460843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003340247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058585525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072056999","doi":"10.7202/1025721ar","title":"Nécessité et imputation chez Hobbes","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.17059665292891504,"score_gpt":0.34457263916989866,"score_spread":0.17397598624098362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072056999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074185826,0.010047968,0.10215938,0.017240064,0.000859815,0.000057659938,0.00017514618,0.00014864859,0.7951255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88305616,0.003017843,0.01873062,0.0011846875,0.00065340725,0.00017018183,0.00011979203,0.00014335463,0.092923984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963503,0.0017730019,0.00014256114,0.0006565415,0.000677053,0.000400562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985514,0.0007132796,0.00013703931,0.0002678459,0.00022793002,0.00010251336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046843053,0.0005885527,0.0008582523,0.0013587051,0.007163891,0.0067879027,0.00085540826,0.0027169036,0.007363762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043747327,0.0007176087,0.0008559631,0.001598283,0.026382005,0.0069355797,0.0051420718,0.0056243525,0.0013572541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044834346,0.0000016898462,0.00004024542,0.000007087315,0.000001160751,0.000019250758,0.0015474688,0.000054608056,0.0000424361,0.99729294,0.00023232373,0.00075637514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008256982,0.000011262475,0.00025923262,0.00004301763,0.0000056650183,0.00008593017,0.001323541,0.0003892194,0.00021998942,0.92493814,0.07270282,0.000012981065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007883883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009103751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007883883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005477708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023934485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03974378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073783469","doi":"10.3917/rmm.113.0309","title":"Loi restrictive et loi productive dans l'éthique fichtéenne","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de métaphysique et de morale","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05817946431559541,"score_gpt":0.27876746847189143,"score_spread":0.22058800415629604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073783469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04323268,0.008928924,0.04967051,0.05889226,0.0010922797,0.000068037916,0.00014787573,0.00013865883,0.83782876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85540247,0.0023595924,0.008838709,0.008028939,0.00090900616,0.00025889906,0.000073879164,0.00015852555,0.12397002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925908,0.0037265944,0.00021630275,0.00086281734,0.001655953,0.0009475544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655175,0.0019062738,0.00027049246,0.0005188787,0.0005360335,0.00021654715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005745805,0.0005698044,0.0005046146,0.0014451473,0.0057228073,0.008888566,0.00121317,0.0042113746,0.0072031254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067451177,0.00038196752,0.0004843068,0.0011491396,0.040735416,0.007891992,0.0043165055,0.0075247237,0.0009900583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051828347,0.000002568632,0.00007743453,0.000013962528,0.000001220912,0.000011916536,0.0026904421,0.0000280136,0.000049577808,0.99469465,0.0009272394,0.0014978378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016558579,0.000027422755,0.0008926603,0.00016790691,0.0000093618,0.000096623604,0.003904517,0.00025475048,0.00041837667,0.7231429,0.27104402,0.000024890986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006149109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007975414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008888566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064660534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005052298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046914637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078675670","doi":"10.7202/027120ar","title":"L’explicite et l’implicite dans la conception du signe chez Hobbes","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.12773440683776477,"score_gpt":0.3372836194120765,"score_spread":0.20954921257431175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078675670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13312964,0.010435005,0.17908297,0.025765736,0.0012262817,0.000069740505,0.00015657069,0.00009950416,0.65003455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283425,0.0026806316,0.01085441,0.0009389088,0.0002455579,0.000088147695,0.00004896758,0.00010102685,0.05669977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982621,0.0010428454,0.000053998243,0.00020158869,0.00027541348,0.00016408984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893266,0.00053820445,0.000120951314,0.00016694545,0.00015842961,0.00008276135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002379761,0.00051172933,0.0004168663,0.0013819167,0.0043480885,0.005896307,0.00059248373,0.0021277445,0.0056652967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031168347,0.00032857392,0.00042062992,0.001328054,0.028686728,0.006446099,0.0033481077,0.0034327542,0.00067553535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007889919,0.0000024501924,0.00017918405,0.00002320651,0.0000017449073,0.000031892552,0.015810417,0.000055791286,0.00017392769,0.98133284,0.0003389817,0.002041617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016216754,0.000057842448,0.0026148553,0.000331608,0.000029947716,0.000426723,0.02784593,0.00082246965,0.0012774097,0.6430174,0.3235091,0.00005047033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061990474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118187545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061990474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029487987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017606977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021395206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080740233","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12149","title":"Spinoza's Thinking Substance and the Necessity of Modes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1842186729777546,"score_gpt":0.3227535020083068,"score_spread":0.13853482903055223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080740233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11010043,0.0045600836,0.18647814,0.025943253,0.0007576757,0.00010593375,0.0001801432,0.0002223549,0.67165196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551244,0.0007379603,0.012847244,0.0006915264,0.00012990087,0.000092761016,0.000028895272,0.000040577885,0.009918742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768114,0.0010747964,0.00012195618,0.0003501697,0.0005127182,0.0002591996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976648,0.0011551407,0.00023210581,0.0004237629,0.00030529787,0.00021880625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034119796,0.00055046414,0.00055998977,0.0018651277,0.004804403,0.007199464,0.00089166866,0.0017268454,0.0041064783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003442616,0.0004215321,0.0007806285,0.001159089,0.038382556,0.0128148785,0.004469918,0.0035847332,0.0004456167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043226246,0.0000013247309,0.00004815171,0.000005675603,0.000001133924,0.000011772635,0.0010203783,0.00003682004,0.000027433322,0.998137,0.00013412761,0.0005718386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010441143,0.0000074466216,0.00011065418,0.000021960515,0.0000046262617,0.000050834195,0.0009358215,0.00029793603,0.000090269226,0.9866288,0.011834937,0.0000064141136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003552786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027339375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007199464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043079904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033387775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031256795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081728906","doi":"10.1177/0090591709340137","title":"The Radical Hobbes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03198801902196852,"score_gpt":0.2588037024958945,"score_spread":0.226815683473926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081728906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058018547,0.00695539,0.009400103,0.037876055,0.0039230348,0.000021765245,0.00006685434,0.000055140983,0.93589973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4426915,0.004281539,0.0047896462,0.015418459,0.004879009,0.0001586516,0.000077376084,0.00023885827,0.527465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837214,0.00088617223,0.00003283921,0.00024254898,0.00029249597,0.00017382648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.0006885779,0.00005761659,0.00028203177,0.0001388309,0.00014842313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022614638,0.0005775853,0.0005234019,0.0013200641,0.0073508034,0.0072176903,0.00083441933,0.0034818107,0.020525573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038622075,0.00028720137,0.0003347956,0.00084609026,0.0298586,0.0056791394,0.0035265605,0.006853583,0.0036989208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020557386,0.0000023884359,0.0000086133505,0.000003828988,5.0334154e-7,0.0000031882869,0.00053075067,0.000011000812,0.000010128751,0.99330306,0.0048960373,0.0012284658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006150347,0.0000047475914,0.000054750406,0.000047048066,0.0000015915971,0.000018541981,0.00063866365,0.00007229881,0.00004851196,0.78739244,0.21171139,0.000003835678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026607711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00499312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020525573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036380826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022158257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06866491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083055006","doi":"10.7202/027171ar","title":"La causalité adéquate chez Spinoza","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23686053207235905,"score_gpt":0.3654942479042057,"score_spread":0.12863371583184666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083055006","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2301891,0.0036047986,0.38350734,0.010158112,0.0003830246,0.00013395872,0.0004106976,0.00030612116,0.3713068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96827805,0.0008315451,0.01556395,0.00036512362,0.00007358349,0.000065991655,0.00009423184,0.000044184024,0.014683377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998336,0.00042269114,0.000097443684,0.00046114795,0.00040756754,0.0002750879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972154,0.0011667464,0.0003550694,0.0005104456,0.00054575724,0.00020656179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023022657,0.0005366553,0.00067094015,0.0020107382,0.0028791502,0.004895324,0.00069919653,0.0015153576,0.009453608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037803864,0.00044760076,0.0013476214,0.0011365581,0.015409677,0.007125385,0.0028569184,0.0033530486,0.00048160975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007687874,0.000004105979,0.00032856356,0.000016653434,0.000006327842,0.0000449137,0.0008450003,0.00032478521,0.00013596642,0.99687815,0.000086249885,0.0013215478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015811682,0.00002341254,0.0014779919,0.000037093883,0.000029946581,0.00012662205,0.001279334,0.00215524,0.00039034447,0.97679627,0.017643748,0.000024311965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017153822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017802047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017153822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055216793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003323573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040062845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086434429","doi":"10.7202/045184ar","title":"« Spinoza et l’islam : un état des lieux »","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Islam; Theology","score_opus":0.37946252516117274,"score_gpt":0.34080992498979135,"score_spread":0.03865260017138139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086434429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096432105,0.04981433,0.0105616385,0.10105494,0.0017729719,0.000029137289,0.00008564686,0.00006371128,0.74018556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483542,0.0072338916,0.0017924887,0.00369971,0.000257809,0.00002245276,0.000021141515,0.000026946293,0.038591564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986808,0.00068055565,0.00003912803,0.00013357884,0.0002470886,0.00021888081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925107,0.00035377528,0.000089537425,0.00009489398,0.00010120716,0.00010941683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014791702,0.00033521524,0.0002858058,0.0009795541,0.00628862,0.007930626,0.00038993472,0.0017191152,0.0049799345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015958317,0.00016888723,0.000200804,0.0012636712,0.026412765,0.0042014457,0.0022851252,0.0036314877,0.00041137822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001533949,0.000005597348,0.0001908418,0.000027383752,0.0000017027452,0.000033081327,0.0058256746,0.000027553397,0.000059142134,0.9865202,0.0015404552,0.005753053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029418954,0.000034649252,0.001997111,0.00033646447,0.000012069335,0.00022267211,0.02232089,0.00024290645,0.00046951786,0.61358654,0.3607235,0.000024282524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014946426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02415515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014946426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058502853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049622143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04244697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086715801","doi":"10.1177/000842980103000307","title":"Leo Strauss and the politics of biblical religion","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Morality; Faith; Relation (database); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Style (visual arts); Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.1308161117541074,"score_gpt":0.356599773454671,"score_spread":0.22578366170056358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086715801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11637304,0.039714687,0.0016565636,0.10804583,0.00031082125,0.000013064777,0.000032034524,0.000020094794,0.7338339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97123486,0.0058165146,0.00034873086,0.0030847853,0.00036921806,0.0000084212015,0.00000818996,0.000010026495,0.019119294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862957,0.00078533863,0.000030709933,0.00009344235,0.00024682208,0.00021419257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985391,0.0008502507,0.00023976695,0.000081137834,0.00017714038,0.0001126902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015083504,0.00011567311,0.00016733269,0.002000875,0.0048069484,0.00387328,0.00033812286,0.0015961394,0.0025075602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026640033,0.000119306984,0.00010293345,0.001519705,0.02057602,0.0028358488,0.002062402,0.0020765855,0.00032984157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004147696,0.0000045178726,0.00021893205,0.000008853541,0.0000011517262,0.0000158183,0.004113464,0.00005590623,0.00003259337,0.9920752,0.001289664,0.0021797987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021457183,0.000017513508,0.0028999925,0.00021451054,0.0000049520345,0.00007453566,0.0061808038,0.0003230509,0.00018572397,0.77252316,0.21754052,0.000013928221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022623396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0155087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007147068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002457009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05185592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094400724","doi":"10.15173/russell.v30i1.2177","title":"Poetic Emotion &lt;em&gt;versus&lt;/em&gt; Truth: Russell’s Preference for Spinoza over Locke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Haute école Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale","keywords":"Empiricism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Normative; Rationalism; Epistemology; Preference; Poetry; Psychology; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.07540173009446934,"score_gpt":0.28412330308798145,"score_spread":0.20872157299351213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094400724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09364839,0.0071760435,0.06718621,0.13322054,0.0015243669,0.000028693867,0.000069476155,0.0002510597,0.6968952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98259693,0.00081332866,0.0048844,0.0031865614,0.00023719513,0.000012603244,0.000010719231,0.00008595637,0.008172298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707806,0.0016723545,0.000092084825,0.00037388908,0.0005630238,0.000220539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970686,0.0018270438,0.00022365169,0.00028529394,0.00039038557,0.00020502892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049317945,0.00028956225,0.00045621526,0.0010047996,0.0025026072,0.006566131,0.0006752573,0.0026360631,0.0032278893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00789647,0.00026454966,0.00036303056,0.0006616883,0.031937413,0.0083975615,0.002084468,0.004804622,0.0005667736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001749517,0.0000039106344,0.00006497697,0.000013784127,0.0000025769496,0.00001900599,0.0019476453,0.000055580345,0.000076111755,0.9943408,0.0010852376,0.0023728884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014081507,0.0000115159655,0.00023021699,0.000034580877,0.0000065092577,0.000050748786,0.0017425136,0.0005174777,0.00016903586,0.9788461,0.018366313,0.000010893764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026733773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021734082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006566131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003409108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012788184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026082098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095496683","doi":"10.7202/019510ar","title":"Beyond the Letter of His Master’s Thought : C.N.R. McCoy on Medieval Political Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Political philosophy; Reading (process); Philosophy; Revelation; Epistemology; Order (exchange); History of political thought; Classics; Theology; History; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0842541510645783,"score_gpt":0.2717453260138789,"score_spread":0.18749117494930062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095496683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007772424,0.15601635,0.0025411118,0.7215747,0.013410961,0.000011755321,0.000080740414,0.00004922349,0.09854272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57434136,0.106163666,0.003891812,0.15061401,0.03430375,0.00008205189,0.00009235765,0.00027938353,0.13023159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976411,0.0011613684,0.00006166836,0.00036293195,0.0005903613,0.00018255622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939668,0.0043406603,0.00027267056,0.00020887841,0.000899416,0.0003115017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024574448,0.0003191987,0.0005005226,0.00086667854,0.004737239,0.0041829925,0.0007217158,0.0019403507,0.0031585565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011362009,0.00024274632,0.0002089271,0.0009596097,0.0089859,0.0043878597,0.0013364613,0.0071218605,0.00081191346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003710389,0.000015684578,0.0004218992,0.00011612368,0.000012226279,0.00014166992,0.008103142,0.00013142533,0.00014875722,0.5429285,0.42525142,0.022692032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061952537,0.000009600953,0.000485003,0.0003088302,0.000003842255,0.00008868535,0.0011514067,0.00015218175,0.00017161471,0.069476284,0.9281303,0.000015880312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016843319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019935299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016843319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056557343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036140138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041035414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100266443","doi":"10.1017/s001221731400050x","title":"Leo Strauss and Anglo-American Democracy: A Conservative CritiqueGRANT N. HAVERS DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 2013; 245 pp.; $37.00 (hardback)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02893658451155398,"score_gpt":0.21955078532197042,"score_spread":0.19061420081041644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100266443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018972285,0.115906715,0.0014158455,0.26958764,0.00087379443,0.000012263677,0.00004521791,0.000029345307,0.59315693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7904177,0.04912797,0.000713049,0.021248372,0.0014678859,0.000054283068,0.00003104022,0.000061332,0.13687837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836713,0.001090019,0.000022816488,0.0000904311,0.00023682005,0.00019277034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885,0.0007725472,0.000082210325,0.00005900688,0.00014120026,0.00009505946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525684,0.0003027967,0.00029872614,0.001333203,0.0063036988,0.0050657876,0.00046628236,0.002096553,0.0054448806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031769352,0.00018422531,0.00014307105,0.0017332359,0.018039139,0.0040482488,0.0019204956,0.0029557238,0.0008963609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015828058,0.000008984621,0.00017750157,0.000035034194,0.0000015608136,0.000028729844,0.012246587,0.0000626019,0.000020455758,0.9440319,0.035342038,0.008028835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012600009,0.000009631858,0.0010324403,0.00051342306,0.000004332129,0.000059808674,0.017834717,0.00016914653,0.00006696964,0.4785888,0.5016991,0.000009019983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026911493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051039312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026911493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006617474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039727376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053509712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102591225","doi":"10.1177/0090591709345463","title":"Approaching Others: Aristotle on Friendship’s Possibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Democracy; Statement (logic); Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0601659445881968,"score_gpt":0.2798299955626103,"score_spread":0.2196640509744135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102591225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0885062,0.011540363,0.03630635,0.033529893,0.00062503986,0.000034167097,0.000045733057,0.0000801891,0.829332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857664,0.0011519331,0.0019852924,0.0007284451,0.00020825648,0.000022898721,0.00001075671,0.000020908721,0.010105134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963082,0.0023649568,0.00006829336,0.00039163735,0.00050188537,0.00036502598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979067,0.0013139776,0.00016903332,0.0002076914,0.00017803014,0.00022453476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028695413,0.00043173935,0.0004672806,0.0014517959,0.01193617,0.0071237115,0.00065437314,0.0025133144,0.0027962376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031814973,0.00026673614,0.0005422816,0.0009215605,0.038186383,0.01048834,0.0045574354,0.0038253812,0.0005006104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041607077,0.000002660893,0.0000632708,0.0000051466745,0.0000014475761,0.00004204527,0.0064060017,0.000051976695,0.00001590609,0.99158657,0.0005310562,0.001289775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073366155,0.000011146555,0.00019969547,0.00003745192,0.0000040871273,0.00007105384,0.0045650043,0.00023898754,0.000052969317,0.9524964,0.042307872,0.000008006435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042748055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036832846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01193617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045192605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013720035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032789648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104568640","doi":"10.7202/014584ar","title":"Sovereignty between Effectiveness and Legitimacy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Power (physics); Popular sovereignty; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law; Politics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04975691562217301,"score_gpt":0.2760145915562988,"score_spread":0.2262576759341258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104568640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043795533,0.0034435566,0.030852696,0.01934503,0.00030334064,0.00008823532,0.000077348646,0.000080143654,0.90201414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735934,0.00090209895,0.0024592741,0.00061829353,0.00038242762,0.000121662866,0.000037408437,0.000053703086,0.008065811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730944,0.012539937,0.0014054949,0.0032496154,0.0075732493,0.0021372826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94098115,0.042425808,0.0035982723,0.005786202,0.0050006593,0.00220778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022988077,0.00053395866,0.0012680105,0.0046146507,0.0040962687,0.01547292,0.0012876409,0.003839023,0.009655614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060203187,0.00048177392,0.00058317534,0.002354609,0.06837912,0.01891309,0.011846979,0.0051648268,0.0010773189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040115096,0.0000060288844,0.0002290538,0.000021521277,0.0000040765235,0.000012164834,0.0006307861,0.00009119919,0.000042014704,0.9969729,0.00023295349,0.0017533497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023939976,0.000024165345,0.0006474711,0.00013085232,0.000013062609,0.00008198438,0.0007459685,0.00044745774,0.00018450936,0.98249257,0.015198482,0.000009524654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015192587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008293387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022988077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045060692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049488074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121574044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114736693","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000098","title":"Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Glory; Ideology; Power (physics); Selfishness; Subversion; Meaning (existential); Anger; Contempt; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.11328378253127572,"score_gpt":0.3062589685639798,"score_spread":0.1929751860327041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114736693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017531512,0.022651467,0.039023694,0.07876977,0.0018421418,0.00007502359,0.00011320568,0.00003289199,0.8399602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91950154,0.010474266,0.0052139447,0.009700212,0.0033453412,0.00022070485,0.000083395076,0.000077620745,0.0513829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511564,0.0028526746,0.00014304579,0.0004856725,0.000855733,0.0005471966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355984,0.004859442,0.0004112964,0.00038723488,0.0005114871,0.000270685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007346456,0.00064539857,0.0007082492,0.0034054061,0.006922013,0.007776745,0.0013839726,0.005624779,0.010340003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009140992,0.00044919513,0.0007615344,0.0026313723,0.03699391,0.012820604,0.0048893504,0.007343633,0.0014898522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023102232,0.0000028433526,0.000036876005,0.000008465851,0.0000013811532,0.000018344841,0.00065694435,0.000055325505,0.000005105754,0.99752563,0.000992793,0.00069399923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007914159,0.0000028512309,0.00006367147,0.000039814426,0.0000020197942,0.000021676167,0.00050039333,0.000113366244,0.000015552436,0.98026526,0.01896493,0.0000027179979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028533386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023647365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010340003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007108494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028304213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05157596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116593380","doi":"10.1017/s1537592709091129","title":"Cloaked in Virtue: Unveiling Leo Strauss and the Rhetoric of American Foreign Policy. By Nicholas Xenos. New York: Routledge, 2007. 168p. $125.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Virtue; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02565373559184473,"score_gpt":0.2682822068594854,"score_spread":0.24262847126764067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116593380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009297247,0.17192887,0.0035873253,0.37387788,0.002865211,0.000019440142,0.000043027216,0.000058241527,0.4383228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7255273,0.065425605,0.0027080763,0.043323644,0.0031948015,0.0001044012,0.00003945044,0.00018474089,0.159492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985915,0.0010176097,0.000020462063,0.00007686424,0.00014907983,0.00014451546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859685,0.001030066,0.00008952728,0.000060702972,0.00014024196,0.00008266184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024515898,0.0005501838,0.0003484323,0.0015936078,0.006950068,0.006070596,0.0007001578,0.0038302469,0.005486914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037626135,0.0003300347,0.00021380438,0.0018522984,0.018666487,0.010165243,0.0026674187,0.005507365,0.0007447326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017263621,0.000009203719,0.00015019071,0.000050661503,0.0000029826745,0.00006480818,0.014520669,0.000068025925,0.000039327006,0.89840925,0.07302054,0.013647023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001308403,0.000013874424,0.0005885913,0.0006853663,0.0000067197475,0.00009397969,0.01742902,0.00029345014,0.00014371345,0.41555715,0.5651577,0.000017379689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020672204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048744638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020672204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064335684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00326005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04667896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118843099","doi":"10.7202/016676ar","title":"Hegel et le spinozisme dans les années d’Iéna","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.06480410909558039,"score_gpt":0.30048490355547053,"score_spread":0.23568079445989015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118843099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05679463,0.019007333,0.003865509,0.017318467,0.00074480404,0.000026823594,0.00005342466,0.00003552553,0.9021534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81184655,0.007973908,0.0015824297,0.0028674838,0.00030709337,0.000055771583,0.00003902729,0.00007320208,0.17525464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984876,0.0006924989,0.00003204346,0.0001788071,0.0003016638,0.00030747804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996165,0.00019733881,0.000033070843,0.000045861496,0.000060521415,0.000046570785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012201396,0.00039589923,0.00038492895,0.0008102009,0.0047230334,0.006051625,0.00038872776,0.0015873739,0.0048458604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015649862,0.00024471345,0.00028064358,0.0008496759,0.02339188,0.003193486,0.0034547155,0.0045963824,0.0008425343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010591246,0.000004788125,0.00011476746,0.000018771938,0.0000017921371,0.000035958365,0.010430467,0.00005668656,0.000063507796,0.9847348,0.0015595972,0.0029682817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016607517,0.000028321987,0.0014556708,0.00029061738,0.000008170777,0.00019409407,0.014893813,0.00018889167,0.0004667643,0.36421546,0.6182105,0.00003115258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018535856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0297735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018535856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006991529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048421617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050727367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129279335","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00015.x","title":"Substance, Attribute, and Mode in Spinoza","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04373140239435835,"score_gpt":0.24455395320364656,"score_spread":0.2008225508092882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129279335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1603581,0.0050758366,0.09214312,0.02031799,0.0007241891,0.00009803011,0.00022872207,0.00018975203,0.7208642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847627,0.0005976981,0.0057360334,0.00057785603,0.00010869528,0.000042460957,0.000031693395,0.000031877487,0.008110879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984706,0.00072793284,0.00008049359,0.00021766085,0.0003194721,0.000183899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988979,0.00049740804,0.00012032976,0.00012653734,0.00021921881,0.0001385341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020612462,0.00040132186,0.0004206538,0.002095455,0.0051067956,0.0078034634,0.0006937221,0.0016477352,0.0041300557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022295308,0.00027923382,0.00039646027,0.0016590696,0.0315677,0.007990334,0.003430447,0.003310674,0.00045978668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029764099,0.0000025039276,0.000053794483,0.000004881077,6.204161e-7,0.000013611861,0.0014918094,0.000024360877,0.000038275728,0.9975957,0.0001527545,0.0006187292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074081104,0.00000635535,0.00022329706,0.00003272061,0.000004856579,0.000057953795,0.0022299285,0.0004301851,0.00012212657,0.97009116,0.026784651,0.000009363398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009114907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006234404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009114907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056220545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002561352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040791094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129360525","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070527","title":"Political Emotions: Aristotle and the Symphony of Reason and Emotion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Politics; Power (physics); Rhetoric; Psychology; Emotion work; Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Social psychology; Symphony; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Political science; Law; Art; Psychotherapist; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026524277785035768,"score_gpt":0.2491147945588023,"score_spread":0.22259051677376654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129360525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023498457,0.23020728,0.03239126,0.13736302,0.003044532,0.000043518794,0.000091407615,0.000084587424,0.5732759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999036,0.042418405,0.009855185,0.013395868,0.0025221177,0.00013182248,0.000060406626,0.000090915506,0.031621683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979431,0.001244752,0.000050700677,0.00017645818,0.00040528312,0.0001797219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999073,0.00062558043,0.00008590398,0.000049304024,0.000097328964,0.00006889932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022426588,0.00068181375,0.00051757006,0.0012007538,0.0037867937,0.008086644,0.0005499759,0.0036279457,0.0021101004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021622572,0.00028561024,0.00037788405,0.0010247012,0.030382164,0.007982163,0.0020123655,0.0045336345,0.000651815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001622576,0.0000061130727,0.00007500154,0.000045477118,0.000004421638,0.00005086618,0.010583457,0.0001219809,0.00008137622,0.97629607,0.006061953,0.006657093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009680606,0.000009292397,0.00037869508,0.00011709261,0.0000031529887,0.0000614686,0.003174807,0.00018544271,0.000038457998,0.9301306,0.06588014,0.000011126308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028575503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030510314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008086644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037918054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014628634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027511656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134534897","doi":"10.5840/symposium20026223","title":"Political Philosophy (Fundamentals of Philosophy)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06276416166364307,"score_gpt":0.24713759652662862,"score_spread":0.18437343486298555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134534897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026948687,0.29957294,0.007247437,0.0764138,0.027487576,0.0000444707,0.00029747546,0.00014768154,0.5860937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09895009,0.11742691,0.005094511,0.008913684,0.03044969,0.00015942681,0.0002434193,0.00014477086,0.7386175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952483,0.00015856345,0.00001895928,0.000077873876,0.00015027268,0.00006958277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996282,0.00014259799,0.000030294543,0.000028271787,0.000090381756,0.00008035286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011907569,0.00066420797,0.00045651366,0.0015457909,0.0033264218,0.006572722,0.0005415719,0.0028594288,0.030219352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013758851,0.00035456038,0.0003823076,0.002139631,0.003216313,0.0036491961,0.0015546097,0.0039351736,0.008196538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011773652,0.000024022764,0.00009339685,0.00010908092,0.0000038738835,0.000031230218,0.0007618533,0.00012801409,0.000121735226,0.6682327,0.297645,0.032837298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042132633,0.0000073030087,0.000294263,0.00021605531,0.000003269701,0.000048973747,0.00021627174,0.000092548275,0.000046851874,0.14698552,0.8520803,0.000004454955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004023533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058180536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030219352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004051112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027477657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10109377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137001790","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909990679","title":"Freedom and Perfection: German Debates on the State in the Eighteenth Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Perfection; Humanities; Philosophy; German; Context (archaeology); Politics; Enlightenment; State (computer science); Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029475120137339456,"score_gpt":0.2509804140629483,"score_spread":0.22150529392560883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137001790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3512026,0.045745023,0.0038395827,0.042112194,0.000551961,0.00002068872,0.00020039741,0.00003225284,0.5562953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98442656,0.0033271287,0.00014241757,0.00087024004,0.00011538112,0.000008359543,0.000018865634,0.000007216005,0.011083884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893874,0.00045894017,0.00003762324,0.000107964974,0.0001789169,0.0002779109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951386,0.00028554583,0.00007454459,0.000027448932,0.000050440063,0.000048106882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020233172,0.00028770478,0.0002158037,0.0014252105,0.0041380906,0.0050814785,0.00032835503,0.0014796294,0.0024476817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001407325,0.0001910369,0.00016450576,0.0012629769,0.022980398,0.0034896785,0.002297704,0.0017928607,0.00017386148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021664908,0.000007464441,0.00019126262,0.000019957144,0.0000025276754,0.0000725037,0.015839484,0.00011948517,0.000083045794,0.9791779,0.0013952376,0.00306952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006222652,0.00005027233,0.0036548276,0.0003181278,0.000014917156,0.00016186423,0.01854261,0.0003123109,0.000779036,0.3344037,0.6416638,0.0000363483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011893484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012416397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011893484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011312261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016268186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08207661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144939262","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000564","title":"The Infinite and the Indeterminate in Spinoza","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Uncountable set; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06335847408517385,"score_gpt":0.22067432282289937,"score_spread":0.15731584873772553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144939262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13051315,0.0064721443,0.07128416,0.05342967,0.0008227358,0.000030856812,0.000100844205,0.00011759474,0.7372288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98762625,0.0005697554,0.002498663,0.001125102,0.00010545851,0.000016569407,0.000012138065,0.00003065282,0.008015296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747723,0.0015089115,0.000101160156,0.00027963944,0.0004104836,0.0002224958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703974,0.002022177,0.00018527405,0.0002691152,0.00031298248,0.00017072512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004353632,0.00029861595,0.0004007154,0.0015798046,0.006343873,0.0095310565,0.0006147725,0.0020396905,0.0037351134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041801375,0.0002472303,0.00036273611,0.0011035348,0.050947897,0.01036621,0.0035554864,0.0046826843,0.00031591844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021648527,0.000001438128,0.000022490165,0.0000031163174,3.9209968e-7,0.000009805372,0.0016651864,0.000019899016,0.000015412634,0.9977836,0.00014694565,0.00032965923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075001963,0.0000050163553,0.00011191978,0.000054668297,0.000003981102,0.00005122439,0.0031397375,0.00036344753,0.00013052406,0.9568727,0.039249185,0.000010059445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005875081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061752805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095310565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060300226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025499554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04375106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149836432","doi":"10.1017/s1479244309002121","title":"QUENTIN SKINNER'S HOBBES AND THE NEO-REPUBLICAN PROJECT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Subject (documents); Politics; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Intellectual history; Philosophy; Classics; Epistemology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.051794588518913096,"score_gpt":0.22594214427978898,"score_spread":0.17414755576087587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149836432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011440582,0.067284554,0.0038305458,0.14386737,0.004486411,0.000019110335,0.0000623598,0.000038093833,0.76897097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5508839,0.037530143,0.0027299272,0.027865041,0.0031927163,0.000104410545,0.00004913095,0.0001600674,0.37748465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873585,0.00079041347,0.000018531007,0.00013683905,0.00018260899,0.00013566893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989687,0.0006677569,0.000055332304,0.00007577172,0.00009402662,0.00013833454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001624622,0.00035925306,0.00026712145,0.0007832302,0.0071319966,0.0047994377,0.00048070258,0.0018183049,0.0053425487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002416644,0.00015740984,0.00012130372,0.0010629923,0.015293704,0.004843513,0.0020885952,0.0033011073,0.0009569452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009811567,0.00000928125,0.00006781671,0.000014707403,0.0000011900738,0.00004841745,0.0043519624,0.000036767375,0.000032602555,0.938086,0.05035089,0.0069905524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004240884,0.000004115917,0.00015935411,0.000110779256,9.012922e-7,0.000047430403,0.0022450981,0.000048702565,0.00008250406,0.18216349,0.8151271,0.000006274647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009280517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019876463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009280517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036329045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020990288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026358664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153801880","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300000366","title":"Three Compatible Theories of Desire","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Psychology; World Wide Web; Multimedia; Internet privacy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04149719577649689,"score_gpt":0.22906972907987963,"score_spread":0.18757253330338275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153801880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051145833,0.0015647034,0.05094566,0.01082443,0.00025382475,0.00012694535,0.0005095713,0.000102073034,0.88452697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633757,0.0006126108,0.011805589,0.0010989757,0.00009589152,0.00021994945,0.00028226746,0.000061803024,0.022447312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945188,0.002822302,0.00025305216,0.0006733381,0.001147501,0.0005850645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949214,0.00245369,0.00034119622,0.0010130568,0.00086878845,0.00040192032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005730578,0.0006468315,0.00069365365,0.002187755,0.003593193,0.009624153,0.0016399669,0.0030220037,0.013287359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009805751,0.00055987155,0.0015351182,0.0018698428,0.012623647,0.009920472,0.004864037,0.0029483486,0.0014560769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006570495,0.0000027711042,0.00007072731,0.000005462483,0.000001469229,0.000009446267,0.0002957315,0.000032631055,0.000010272637,0.99876106,0.00026071872,0.00054328854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016306221,0.0000067593946,0.00017393086,0.00002554041,0.0000066494867,0.000045738296,0.0010163886,0.00050779874,0.00005156668,0.99241114,0.0057314704,0.000006734468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024895582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002676537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013287359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044348408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026228088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04445064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156049942","doi":"10.7202/009569ar","title":"Spinoza et le problème de l’intentionnalité","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.3288203987580729,"score_gpt":0.3386722916728184,"score_spread":0.00985189291474553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156049942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05142482,0.01768151,0.117966235,0.08895111,0.0027964376,0.000051957883,0.00012423698,0.00014674322,0.720857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88810444,0.005326235,0.013848551,0.005895369,0.00083431066,0.000086146014,0.000043377622,0.000126777,0.08573491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979844,0.00083325995,0.000089490386,0.000326869,0.00042269623,0.00034327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764234,0.0014237451,0.00022276258,0.00021586938,0.00029981614,0.00019545089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030601434,0.00051016576,0.00052739447,0.0013279053,0.004876771,0.008433588,0.00081243785,0.0026741312,0.008387176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003105441,0.0003051653,0.0007145092,0.0012501237,0.02606477,0.00835943,0.0039918115,0.0054969355,0.0009280157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048587644,0.0000021627854,0.00005295592,0.000011119659,0.0000012836426,0.000013687123,0.00096106436,0.000026966956,0.000028834336,0.9968689,0.00050170737,0.0015264708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013697048,0.000016512373,0.000395596,0.00008324053,0.000007427338,0.00008457138,0.0021903068,0.0003415686,0.00025441207,0.89272904,0.10386765,0.000015983293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072753923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010377364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008433588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005323934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003652315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038627982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169118977","doi":"10.1111/rati.12058","title":"Hypocrisy and the Nature of Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Notice; Disposition; Consistency (knowledge bases); Epistemology; Psychology; Phenomenon; Inscribed figure; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014673596263842112,"score_gpt":0.22069302299450422,"score_spread":0.2060194267306621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169118977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37686962,0.0067864703,0.056052756,0.06363204,0.00046869888,0.000060869334,0.00009996759,0.0001032338,0.4959263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694926,0.00021978367,0.0009849506,0.00043962395,0.00004914871,0.0000088685665,0.0000074791146,0.0000058900855,0.0013349104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938939,0.0034579318,0.00026825457,0.0006545027,0.0012465514,0.0004788444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935986,0.0057333377,0.0017263421,0.0011578115,0.001554171,0.00046851338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006557664,0.00021293608,0.0003461592,0.0017798345,0.0021523815,0.0054130964,0.0008571698,0.0021053976,0.0026087502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013225684,0.00032158918,0.00028638434,0.0010823106,0.04968633,0.007794397,0.002973056,0.0041100113,0.00017996896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012380263,0.000006401222,0.000453851,0.000012960417,0.0000034672844,0.00005878264,0.007328236,0.00011905659,0.000116978066,0.990213,0.00023262802,0.0014422722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013373926,0.000016638818,0.0009110146,0.000059823567,0.000005843828,0.00013290271,0.0031058635,0.00087115983,0.0001569396,0.98485965,0.009856215,0.000010646347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033617124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015974888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006557664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042552333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019875956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034680605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197224201","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-6893-5_7","title":"The Reverse Achilles in Locke","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of philosophy of mind","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.17428922235072747,"score_gpt":0.2793198935335844,"score_spread":0.10503067118285692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197224201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071898196,0.030607358,0.010032619,0.47061166,0.010341724,0.000026710617,0.00010861216,0.00013031284,0.47095123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38170853,0.016529312,0.0064105135,0.16344175,0.009116038,0.00015540223,0.00007693459,0.00077017443,0.4217913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971488,0.0014194164,0.00006452274,0.0005503226,0.0005393049,0.0002775471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479115,0.0031727082,0.00018641767,0.00070010347,0.00067354814,0.0004760912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00443864,0.00043368092,0.00070713036,0.0011436255,0.005899245,0.008369361,0.0008772585,0.004933531,0.018003834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012684181,0.00037596578,0.00033091026,0.0010013784,0.033977896,0.019615488,0.004229846,0.012663822,0.0035515286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014809227,0.0000059637346,0.000057193593,0.000019602523,0.0000020540435,0.000012578356,0.0018361924,0.000016576645,0.000019103287,0.9622825,0.031946197,0.0037871546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017637889,0.000011400157,0.00010084632,0.00016513493,0.00000297703,0.000051015664,0.0021973478,0.00006769133,0.00007877482,0.4650688,0.5322258,0.000012603693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009190567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014605448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018003834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034342601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042686583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060228765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202111117","doi":"","title":"Bas C. van Fraassen,Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press, 2008, 408 + xiv p.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.3055662268629947,"score_gpt":0.28292017323247987,"score_spread":0.022646053630514862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202111117","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037061333,0.9074947,0.0019559595,0.01177918,0.007991004,0.000013351274,0.0014911686,0.00019194701,0.06871217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009159958,0.65129316,0.003814846,0.0027392143,0.004270887,0.00008918836,0.0017588292,0.00064611644,0.32622775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994287,0.000095272415,0.000070379894,0.00014947158,0.00021352721,0.000042575513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985648,0.00078856456,0.0001526549,0.00008770448,0.0003151686,0.00009112902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011504567,0.002540375,0.0015922087,0.003263859,0.0014260175,0.004242854,0.0013226086,0.0022137645,0.08981861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003346369,0.0013894122,0.00065728085,0.005571362,0.0018652573,0.0060547637,0.0013477139,0.0040799105,0.05418079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057504567,0.00002437845,0.00015206078,0.0009547667,0.000019159535,0.0000630701,0.0004833134,0.00034564163,0.00016949148,0.022444721,0.8798826,0.09540323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000804211,0.0000072205835,0.0007958482,0.0009792073,0.000009970098,0.00015573579,0.00027165285,0.00010480984,0.00011776987,0.008321806,0.98921597,0.000011885105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015232441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038350128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08981861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002501002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024424049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3004732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209730179","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-9385-1_7","title":"“Nemo non videt”: Intuitive Knowledge and the Question of Spinoza’s Elitism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Elitism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Fragility; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.02721473810269388,"score_gpt":0.2592953063997884,"score_spread":0.2320805682970945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209730179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03634973,0.010268067,0.03407086,0.07878345,0.0013483636,0.000031435673,0.00015298469,0.00015137956,0.83884376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372275,0.0015096193,0.0062649786,0.006366894,0.0006485316,0.00007876462,0.00006342795,0.00016301277,0.047677286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981141,0.0010075851,0.00006166619,0.0003356108,0.00027770823,0.00020333851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792874,0.0013586624,0.000118953525,0.00030279186,0.00021192436,0.000078943696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036201938,0.00045324667,0.00074628706,0.0012755989,0.0051662014,0.008200563,0.00092345505,0.0032623035,0.005121824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063636038,0.00039594926,0.0005364727,0.0009256476,0.044454932,0.013846969,0.0025561894,0.008081745,0.00071940204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004349421,0.0000020534437,0.000023024395,0.000005109776,8.930269e-7,0.00000551965,0.0007698274,0.000018492894,0.0000116306,0.99760616,0.0008411663,0.00071185856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068282975,0.0000022309084,0.00007133779,0.000024959827,0.0000017636394,0.000018632676,0.00050084887,0.00012066947,0.000051459425,0.9816959,0.017500987,0.000004387993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005732124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061807553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008200563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048606545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035266697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211931770","doi":"","title":"Hobbes's Constitutional Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Legal positivism; Law; Sovereignty; Positive law; Natural law; Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Constitutional theory; Municipal law; Public law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Private law; Sociology; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.02565982479683619,"score_gpt":0.22799202098369067,"score_spread":0.2023321961868545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211931770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007837419,0.008240245,0.03964743,0.031299576,0.0010251547,0.00007372847,0.00023081571,0.00007086862,0.9115747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81677836,0.008600816,0.021474732,0.009369849,0.0026345365,0.0004950678,0.0002426831,0.0001675006,0.14023635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650466,0.0014247972,0.00013496778,0.0006423197,0.00089737505,0.00039590022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980166,0.0011235857,0.00008390959,0.00030957424,0.00028696598,0.00017944655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050104125,0.00046952284,0.0006939717,0.0022782767,0.006588011,0.007919259,0.0012257034,0.004294983,0.0055037593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005549172,0.00043683607,0.00062275643,0.0016248247,0.034970425,0.0066847154,0.0028774533,0.004693088,0.0012832303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.095694e-7,8.2453147e-7,0.000005679504,0.0000025451716,2.6020834e-7,0.000003370982,0.00013079625,0.000030272276,0.0000044233498,0.99905354,0.00049306615,0.00027482864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047517865,0.000002889298,0.000038366426,0.000027083297,0.0000014494453,0.000010647015,0.00012300943,0.00013142126,0.000028941064,0.94186443,0.05776368,0.000003319269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014901939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103188865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014901939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011706314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005913501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084935606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224492518","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834.007","title":"Contract Law in the Aristotelian Tradition","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Politics; Political philosophy; Law; Classics; Literature; Epistemology; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.06094093640651713,"score_gpt":0.20669191324816366,"score_spread":0.14575097684164653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224492518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009943487,0.016165059,0.00960195,0.019082107,0.00048554808,0.000014707373,0.00003997372,0.000033988075,0.9446332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7853759,0.012132365,0.0058778776,0.0070340964,0.0016669009,0.00010880117,0.0000681766,0.00006716188,0.18766867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722123,0.0009287081,0.00007431737,0.0002503165,0.0012149056,0.0003105068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889815,0.00050802977,0.0000665871,0.00016881732,0.00025492383,0.00010352856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028604472,0.00028654904,0.00032636515,0.0012352902,0.005904502,0.006783661,0.00093776477,0.0037479925,0.004020484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038974744,0.00025563693,0.00021008431,0.0017005331,0.022109902,0.0060057472,0.0017296763,0.0034930594,0.0010421254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.784918e-7,0.0000024156222,0.000015204927,0.00000318047,1.9947745e-7,0.0000045606034,0.00025707716,0.000036341255,0.000004524435,0.9971071,0.0012661725,0.0013023689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004804599,0.0000035633864,0.00011924949,0.00005446124,8.1006897e-7,0.000023293172,0.0002777694,0.00024154483,0.00001991679,0.90100056,0.09824996,0.000004087508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019113919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018429646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019113919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011817826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008650162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08574474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225250453","doi":"","title":"Waller R. Newell , Ruling Passion: the Erotics of Statecraft in Platonic Political Philosophy . Reviewed by","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Politics; Philosophy; Literature; Law; Art; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05123282519382419,"score_gpt":0.257972796633231,"score_spread":0.20673997143940684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225250453","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063510536,0.84808904,0.00072492653,0.11395258,0.008710645,0.00000766812,0.00011862258,0.000018670113,0.027742775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022057882,0.8931804,0.0006499289,0.018682439,0.011216022,0.00002861418,0.00014064675,0.00007320696,0.053970892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991934,0.000337743,0.000059068552,0.0001085303,0.0002435938,0.000057692363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969868,0.0019501481,0.0001900594,0.00007019709,0.0006339369,0.00016892132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012638158,0.0010625726,0.0009511722,0.002885221,0.0022966526,0.003294996,0.0011777394,0.0040360666,0.02037106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045970655,0.000642706,0.00033686816,0.0037037376,0.0041571595,0.010510751,0.0014108575,0.005491173,0.0056369966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003847261,0.000020416912,0.00019139067,0.0007146525,0.000019988016,0.00009957229,0.0016288265,0.00021688604,0.00007313509,0.093914516,0.8596991,0.043383054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001813357,0.000009839628,0.0015310991,0.0025105616,0.000018575782,0.00015143851,0.0019897665,0.00012265278,0.00015277874,0.04386659,0.949597,0.000031513362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023944346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0591381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023944346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027636215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022327555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06814796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236503688","doi":"10.1016/j.mce.2009.09.015","title":"Foreward","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Child and Family Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.02082486463562297,"score_gpt":0.22491558925976435,"score_spread":0.20409072462414138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236503688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001082686,0.0013268591,0.0014446363,0.02174082,0.01407264,0.00004087883,0.00044136087,0.0003742218,0.9594758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002971254,0.00021899899,0.00021058138,0.0042684763,0.0007086121,0.000013914642,0.00011196196,0.00007205193,0.99142414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993057,0.00009743522,0.000020405583,0.00015385187,0.00028401127,0.0001385748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893266,0.00012756548,0.00004575313,0.00020268752,0.00038015004,0.00031122635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060667243,0.00042285823,0.00028254758,0.0007971488,0.0027291975,0.005316483,0.0008842756,0.0024275284,0.51263934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025378524,0.00019622494,0.00034101744,0.00052973063,0.0012060342,0.0025535622,0.0031693531,0.0032965152,0.33827248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041040705,0.00003225435,0.00037192483,0.00006336814,0.0000037626407,0.00010747544,0.00046854207,0.000032479344,0.00069119484,0.07991513,0.79822767,0.12004504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017489185,0.0000031272716,0.00014171768,0.000016408627,8.0010796e-7,0.000025741476,0.000099201214,0.000008823892,0.000089810776,0.0026647449,0.99694604,0.0000018354606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023763494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065646386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51263934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011866648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018921312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238371548","doi":"10.22329/p.v7i2.3825","title":"Response to Readers of &lt;i&gt;Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization&lt;/i&gt;","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.042180363238437234,"score_gpt":0.2653519292344714,"score_spread":0.22317156599603413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238371548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010221116,0.0026224079,0.00016828976,0.9460191,0.039917953,0.000022095432,0.00008213412,0.000096490934,0.010049304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02937785,0.0040999902,0.00043345185,0.78707886,0.076129854,0.00022276999,0.000126795,0.00039449907,0.102135845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979937,0.0007178587,0.00010712178,0.000379534,0.0005015602,0.00030032417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990633,0.005163041,0.0006669932,0.0003685825,0.0019553534,0.0012129971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003711135,0.0009793903,0.0011035075,0.001055923,0.007974373,0.009620545,0.0020947622,0.016295474,0.02197148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02015302,0.00054015755,0.00075509213,0.0014145769,0.006438447,0.006851226,0.0039828564,0.02411617,0.00592197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016629614,0.0000058449245,0.00015171233,0.000040734885,0.0000019178217,0.00017829228,0.001666196,0.000014991774,0.00005081974,0.002851874,0.99300885,0.0020122142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012593331,0.000020722715,0.00066115486,0.00028295637,0.000007839469,0.00024446766,0.010910803,0.00007622927,0.00017466118,0.0026422697,0.9849273,0.0000389361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008510816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01323661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02197148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045045833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00304656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073501945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247841744","doi":"","title":"Hobbes’s Relational Theory: Beneath Power and Consent","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Sovereignty; Obligation; Fiduciary; Possession (linguistics); Subject (documents); Duty; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.056162385504089515,"score_gpt":0.233489705078748,"score_spread":0.17732731957465847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247841744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015938172,0.011051194,0.16372453,0.059384253,0.0008708625,0.00013404254,0.00014260864,0.00009060868,0.7486636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89146215,0.0068195476,0.038414907,0.007969301,0.0014118073,0.00035533012,0.00010882474,0.00017078298,0.05328735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993287,0.003994183,0.00025348942,0.0008977429,0.0011448847,0.0004226704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962442,0.0023603425,0.0002518245,0.00053550326,0.00033834117,0.00026980983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007479413,0.0006736632,0.0006054827,0.0018044577,0.0049732737,0.009642851,0.0015125163,0.005029172,0.005994474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009643857,0.00047706216,0.0008062676,0.0017028408,0.047371402,0.0142693855,0.0049692164,0.0053990385,0.0013017872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015804279,0.0000016107402,0.000011362761,0.00000478295,7.4244457e-7,0.000012706842,0.000751503,0.00004161243,0.0000137627685,0.9982553,0.0003760347,0.00052882783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049466894,0.000004170424,0.000033827902,0.000024309735,0.0000016370535,0.000022461076,0.00027399178,0.00017350099,0.000035514313,0.98076886,0.018653164,0.000003610588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046987045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002580278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009642851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005993647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031326134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04348719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253594135","doi":"","title":"Robert C. Bartlett , The Idea of Enlightenment: A Post-Mortem Study . Reviewed by","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029001680410109518,"score_gpt":0.2517306204206674,"score_spread":0.22272894001055787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253594135","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025930433,0.95135826,0.00017631374,0.036986995,0.0044104527,0.0000054115403,0.00007494204,0.0000078473195,0.0067205434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008001356,0.9646326,0.0001989135,0.007876599,0.0057246103,0.000013096054,0.00009525933,0.000024851233,0.013432714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909973,0.0003174541,0.000071873415,0.00015311646,0.00029302505,0.000064894826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963469,0.002231532,0.00027971336,0.00009126169,0.00088496984,0.00016560823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017732262,0.0010468768,0.00088469696,0.003677754,0.0022013665,0.003052849,0.0017411778,0.0043088556,0.015279786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004844439,0.0006753722,0.00038825686,0.0053506684,0.0046302676,0.0073805386,0.0013086798,0.00480039,0.005087811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000645802,0.000027962304,0.00032177297,0.0014148684,0.000022516542,0.00012760288,0.0018355327,0.0001221659,0.00008945736,0.0487283,0.8869082,0.06033711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015173183,0.000013482933,0.0025768008,0.0025047746,0.000019427665,0.00029532757,0.0016380383,0.000037753212,0.00011193612,0.01660391,0.9761578,0.000025612038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027989354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043532953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027989354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003265324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00245314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055652857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256623465","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195335828.013.002","title":"Spinoza’s Philosophy of Religion","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Christianity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Content (measure theory); Philosophy of religion; Relation (database); Religious studies","score_opus":0.0440637700134721,"score_gpt":0.20505078536962065,"score_spread":0.16098701535614857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256623465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014181715,0.015854664,0.00968281,0.016632564,0.00073996704,0.000015771111,0.00006483593,0.000053989093,0.9427737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79343504,0.014144944,0.0058871205,0.0043668104,0.0008160405,0.00006238573,0.000071622926,0.00006573304,0.18115027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995727,0.00015824441,0.000015251597,0.000062217645,0.00012967197,0.00006199707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978393,0.00009326522,0.00002074264,0.000027685628,0.0000397798,0.00003461202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005624399,0.0002845757,0.00023191163,0.00080853724,0.003100005,0.0033231843,0.00037400736,0.000894868,0.00417657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006142275,0.00013619676,0.00024342797,0.00076803524,0.009875877,0.0032200941,0.001178246,0.0027103852,0.0006825432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002834103,0.0000023372354,0.000032707005,0.000011009666,5.94381e-7,0.0000125675815,0.00073875306,0.000034975736,0.000029811521,0.9943376,0.0021227517,0.0026740301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000820987,0.0000113648775,0.00034660194,0.000096618314,0.0000035413204,0.0001271021,0.0011221071,0.00023061136,0.000088308545,0.5978882,0.40007067,0.0000067800033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075029284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00909835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075029284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053654662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002842672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038929343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274947936","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107707115.005","title":"Leo Strauss: The Politics of Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Political Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0726416263924285,"score_gpt":0.2535003446399372,"score_spread":0.1808587182475087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274947936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043460736,0.10835779,0.0056851124,0.060271196,0.0014615587,0.000019056966,0.00006101987,0.00010835537,0.81968987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33333105,0.04950679,0.0037317607,0.020605681,0.0019877476,0.00011876952,0.00009216425,0.00028739596,0.59033865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989779,0.00049275806,0.000018594988,0.00009067889,0.0003098993,0.00011024433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955755,0.00026553578,0.000026664407,0.000029585995,0.00007676453,0.00004389389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000815725,0.00041811474,0.0002725293,0.0010822285,0.0030768276,0.0044248854,0.00049324497,0.0016286892,0.0052995845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016399417,0.00023175115,0.00019912331,0.001190041,0.010884699,0.004292612,0.0017539073,0.004521719,0.0023865676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058687865,0.0000061958726,0.000057051104,0.000038624883,0.0000014791708,0.000021021262,0.0035648055,0.00010326465,0.00006545091,0.93238485,0.05127786,0.012473556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033278661,0.000008179608,0.0001870811,0.00025422487,0.0000014730716,0.0000648291,0.0012534114,0.0001949589,0.000079033125,0.23855996,0.75938773,0.000005733172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016603973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019778289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016603973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008890872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036738787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06450808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279200793","doi":"","title":"Erasmus and Voltaire: A Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian review of comparative literature","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Erasmus+; Philosophy; Classics; History; Art; Literature; Art history; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.12743132214637326,"score_gpt":0.3432077770395147,"score_spread":0.21577645489314146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279200793","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017309498,0.99929094,0.000013433102,0.00026604865,0.00012040822,7.553602e-7,0.0000038257476,7.1348757e-7,0.0002866126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003137671,0.99913895,0.000027516255,0.0002266431,0.00016882695,0.0000020819728,0.000005036191,6.293843e-7,0.00011654198],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994844,0.00013549768,0.000091611175,0.000084870764,0.00016287486,0.000040631516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997341,0.0019785238,0.00024563482,0.0000344493,0.00032567655,0.00007482072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014124978,0.0010066552,0.002071009,0.0047477228,0.0006545466,0.0027187618,0.0011250301,0.0018811498,0.0072596907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047194017,0.00046729617,0.00076416234,0.010411326,0.0014962058,0.0042213206,0.0013579257,0.0024850506,0.0018568088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007413094,0.00004474112,0.00037257306,0.06417093,0.00018346918,0.0002535579,0.00041219083,0.0002575344,0.00020353869,0.020100124,0.11632112,0.797606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015534015,0.00003267864,0.0014006785,0.040324427,0.00019930128,0.00093862304,0.0003840316,0.000039417668,0.00007937402,0.006604999,0.94995373,0.000027253507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009751369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072596907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016733013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005375275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024286091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283024960","doi":"","title":"Schelling’s Philosophical Ethnology: History, Mythology and the Question of South America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Metaphysics; Realm; Natural (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0835934075587748,"score_gpt":0.2760810509874641,"score_spread":0.1924876434286893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283024960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16098848,0.025583867,0.006032377,0.07259043,0.0005643234,0.00003136749,0.00006912985,0.000029972001,0.7341102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717145,0.0029833615,0.00055453304,0.0028556446,0.00011684683,0.000026362857,0.000013138939,0.00002468763,0.021710826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992079,0.00058563723,0.000011564771,0.00006745714,0.00005056085,0.000077008204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922085,0.0005892272,0.000042209394,0.000057910147,0.00004331586,0.000046505316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010087914,0.0002462204,0.00020789637,0.0010772881,0.005730029,0.002886125,0.00049386104,0.0015962023,0.0041044448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014329767,0.0001284997,0.00014751656,0.0011267145,0.024850786,0.004385823,0.0027579465,0.0024092623,0.00021797755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007714265,0.0000054299467,0.00030544386,0.000035077654,0.0000018299098,0.00008341767,0.07454769,0.00008346143,0.00012333578,0.9179289,0.0033206092,0.0035571193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013126964,0.0000121901,0.0013212671,0.00048037714,0.000004988015,0.00021315784,0.096729465,0.00031776604,0.00030432717,0.44617218,0.45441902,0.000012152991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017208502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024551854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017208502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005434943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020009638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03943348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285949231","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511763144.002","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.03432281982382308,"score_gpt":0.19119605874516218,"score_spread":0.15687323892133911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285949231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009944291,0.0039898474,0.0025712345,0.008537739,0.0035905046,0.00008596268,0.0018260999,0.00034920062,0.97805506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014594968,0.0037145116,0.0020257563,0.004706625,0.0014446181,0.00012922363,0.0021494746,0.00027885404,0.97095597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986823,0.00020681712,0.00005745777,0.00035473952,0.00054196443,0.00015669575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897695,0.00020022117,0.00006457652,0.00016856744,0.0003962478,0.00019358892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009128955,0.0006968062,0.00047463595,0.0011334481,0.0023399019,0.006852047,0.0017388767,0.0031832673,0.36852124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031134554,0.00024064377,0.00045259943,0.0015808014,0.0019441682,0.0046172887,0.0034341281,0.0027138055,0.18142073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041679355,0.00004109686,0.00042373824,0.00025170052,0.0000045228817,0.00012986628,0.0013372635,0.000113682414,0.000282133,0.25463033,0.63028383,0.112460054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016028655,0.0000054649217,0.00018195147,0.0000816595,8.554847e-7,0.000061098224,0.00018089778,0.000014803775,0.000035071942,0.0069924123,0.9924414,0.000002782205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042517637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045508593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36852124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026900966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027477082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9007278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288364245","doi":"","title":"The Exclusionary Character of the Early Modern International Community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Referent; International law; Political science; Universality (dynamical systems); Hegelianism; International community; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.021069569559629554,"score_gpt":0.22873740698360132,"score_spread":0.20766783742397177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288364245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15483414,0.004604151,0.017891746,0.01773302,0.00052894437,0.000038861435,0.000038521892,0.00005355196,0.80427694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97109824,0.001071831,0.0013298874,0.0012145975,0.00031941658,0.00005219631,0.000021300075,0.000033580163,0.02485896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571544,0.0018105916,0.000113923954,0.00050130463,0.0011505798,0.0007081796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973749,0.0008315313,0.000302246,0.00037589014,0.00057089,0.0005445556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040150005,0.00021377542,0.00042783408,0.0019109725,0.012110725,0.009581152,0.0009472963,0.0017779912,0.0030707505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051340596,0.00018340714,0.00023826485,0.0011627482,0.040706675,0.0078472635,0.0076605985,0.0048124627,0.00040271837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005306212,0.0000060874618,0.00013417524,0.00000788227,9.771207e-7,0.00003395718,0.014794388,0.000027648097,0.00005100767,0.98169875,0.00066080695,0.002578994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013273662,0.00002816887,0.0009821064,0.00015290639,0.0000062756094,0.00019969608,0.018037295,0.00029815812,0.00015437703,0.6685608,0.31154567,0.000021321906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006271522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006474412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012110725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043110535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004257586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031279027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289845231","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716578","title":"Spinoza and the<i>a priori</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027844585641954116,"score_gpt":0.20407082467760784,"score_spread":0.17622623903565374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289845231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038684364,0.027988626,0.030435495,0.06426187,0.0016547799,0.000026862119,0.00014569271,0.00013858637,0.8366638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92598844,0.005177484,0.007372153,0.0042745885,0.00049465965,0.00004951823,0.00007316205,0.000110244815,0.056459825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852705,0.000740202,0.00005634848,0.00025741674,0.00022612161,0.00019284223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998993,0.00042934585,0.00010459424,0.00018825868,0.00015297809,0.00013179264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002064521,0.00040173676,0.00043098023,0.0010800307,0.007463991,0.008259555,0.0005712411,0.001883496,0.005489441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001852399,0.00032546904,0.0005271073,0.0010158409,0.03323946,0.0078979675,0.0028812385,0.004333876,0.00085772166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004051672,0.0000014882942,0.000034169643,0.000007798141,9.032601e-7,0.000008264513,0.0005057525,0.000021814454,0.000017483948,0.9976826,0.00080001523,0.000915672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053463536,0.000005407183,0.0001613118,0.000049321807,0.0000033711797,0.000039784245,0.0008048555,0.00015181409,0.000066300214,0.9360654,0.06263996,0.0000071333443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011054975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014371985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011054975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062876167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004373086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045620084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296978966","doi":"","title":"Natural Theology as Conscience: RousseauS Democratization of SpinozaS Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Democratization; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Political science; Natural law; Environmental ethics; Theology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Democracy; History; Politics","score_opus":0.02501167355953114,"score_gpt":0.28576285148050745,"score_spread":0.2607511779209763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296978966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123888694,0.0018558176,0.026626991,0.048969883,0.0004981873,0.00006695943,0.000050755196,0.000082588806,0.7979601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98276925,0.000117592215,0.0017361328,0.0012651226,0.00011400277,0.000035758992,0.000008311127,0.000023430754,0.0139303645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569327,0.0025284735,0.00009624256,0.00064286747,0.00044140127,0.00059770653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703646,0.0013558419,0.00023369955,0.00075944216,0.0003309118,0.00028370868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006464059,0.00025159665,0.00052729796,0.0010484583,0.00726229,0.0055379844,0.00076131563,0.0030783843,0.0045896135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00931703,0.00021515078,0.0004737642,0.0006227387,0.03244193,0.0043713693,0.003499532,0.004818781,0.00035921347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004231858,0.0000037330708,0.000040660667,0.0000023950784,0.0000011819321,0.000005973913,0.000595364,0.00004779743,0.000013277438,0.9983175,0.0003536887,0.0006143355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012119121,0.0000037667048,0.00016982874,0.000012115757,0.0000021824312,0.000008344249,0.000383339,0.00028118328,0.000045121706,0.9893826,0.009695047,0.0000042555707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011940124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016135741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011940124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062037525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054001706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04501158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314578598","doi":"10.18732/h27p45","title":"Mendicants and Medicine: Āyurveda in Jain Monastic Texts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Science in South Asia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Classics; Period (music); Resistance (ecology); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Medical literature; Psychology; History; Literature; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Social science; Art; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04956512214192025,"score_gpt":0.25345660325372266,"score_spread":0.20389148111180241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314578598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44776142,0.07520453,0.0016582132,0.047983672,0.0038690362,0.00008625584,0.00032731608,0.00016556896,0.42294392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626072,0.009599027,0.00042606253,0.0019748467,0.0007183003,0.000026099766,0.00005255766,0.000040578532,0.024555258],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992772,0.00037498967,0.000044742203,0.0000730674,0.0001230038,0.00010689181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811566,0.0013409035,0.00019758634,0.000076311706,0.00016752536,0.00010200597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015730822,0.000467792,0.00032158458,0.0014157224,0.008364768,0.0039379164,0.0005119489,0.0011236516,0.0030721114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025768604,0.00016900209,0.000110461406,0.0018926337,0.009934904,0.0014235488,0.0016035639,0.002653336,0.0003895004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012496165,0.000034598685,0.0014874574,0.0008318665,0.000014417267,0.0015374592,0.6119815,0.00012567537,0.0019837029,0.35452658,0.011391723,0.01596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011613242,0.00006128233,0.009638058,0.00079097017,0.000026764299,0.0008559117,0.14825834,0.00017666763,0.0014586414,0.009359637,0.8293208,0.00004140377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011034964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023823315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011034964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005286888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019618073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038359225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316889299","doi":"10.1017/s0012217311000497","title":"Réfutations de Spinoza divin dans les premières réfutations de Spinoza","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.0951687172575125,"score_gpt":0.2658129416733861,"score_spread":0.1706442244158736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316889299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18635829,0.0075730127,0.03125323,0.041894525,0.0023956003,0.00014273869,0.000101987,0.00015929484,0.7301214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403872,0.00091275957,0.0033468874,0.0020680723,0.00029530076,0.0000550644,0.000033792032,0.00006708796,0.05283383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620676,0.0016525721,0.0002027246,0.0005246581,0.0008305305,0.0005826934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950917,0.002726673,0.00044501357,0.0005683251,0.0009755524,0.00019278837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005033732,0.00046535142,0.0004401267,0.0016459423,0.0069830297,0.0055014654,0.00093009893,0.0029293436,0.0070501794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005979701,0.00025982276,0.00048519325,0.0012093477,0.028303962,0.004474111,0.003420361,0.0057737143,0.00087236054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020037158,0.000008051309,0.00025441663,0.000038763075,0.0000038998883,0.00016173368,0.02311745,0.000054981272,0.00023406596,0.9704158,0.0014270424,0.004263705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037755184,0.00007674291,0.0015687955,0.00043783523,0.00002764624,0.00049083406,0.027202122,0.00044537184,0.0024137774,0.4247772,0.54247165,0.000050270082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00740581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011007517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008429083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008429083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005270376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061157525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318233669","doi":"10.1086/673652","title":": <i> Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The <i>Theologico-Political Treatise</i> </i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Classics; Theology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025420014245973146,"score_gpt":0.2323604838384626,"score_spread":0.20694046959248946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318233669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006315621,0.10551798,0.0032082624,0.21366735,0.011514782,0.0000144902015,0.00044482856,0.000082074264,0.6592345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39845458,0.06053754,0.0027307777,0.063503236,0.00936831,0.00010106611,0.00047303297,0.00032021772,0.46451128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954045,0.00018456155,0.000021229465,0.000058508198,0.00013088109,0.00006445711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963844,0.00016150685,0.000043209293,0.000032106807,0.00007306371,0.00005160725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007711587,0.0003617273,0.00021212024,0.000694885,0.0035780186,0.005238374,0.00035869473,0.0015985614,0.01579624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014126389,0.0001197387,0.00021010694,0.0016956531,0.0056813825,0.003675574,0.0012084916,0.0036853992,0.002826783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013658932,0.0000072832217,0.00024760616,0.0000823794,0.0000032925593,0.000026428203,0.0026513417,0.000024441206,0.00007792106,0.73809516,0.24708194,0.011688526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063302264,0.000004837296,0.0011995424,0.00030118582,0.00000583565,0.00005668399,0.002097278,0.000027185035,0.0001436319,0.07071831,0.9254314,0.000007800299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020151533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048778832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020151533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030495971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031456908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05284369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319213665","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000437","title":"Spinoza and German IdealismECKART FÖRSTER, AND YITZHAK Y. MELAMED, eds. Cambridge University Press, 2012; vii + 285 pp.; $100.95 (hardback)","year":2013,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026387332018054675,"score_gpt":0.22851173605123698,"score_spread":0.2021244040331823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319213665","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013685351,0.8781697,0.00061968906,0.017669212,0.0016781471,0.0000048604197,0.00006802427,0.000030007055,0.100391835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07726989,0.7853928,0.0010215861,0.0027843844,0.0022286265,0.000040778832,0.00015389241,0.00011206027,0.13099594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995054,0.00017422273,0.000023380495,0.00007987284,0.00012564647,0.00009139511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997904,0.00010086324,0.000029190269,0.000014595573,0.000028877994,0.00003611633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000865498,0.0010713077,0.0007739972,0.0015581301,0.0024474743,0.004915898,0.00045985286,0.0014083532,0.01514979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096193474,0.00059763546,0.0002724311,0.0020828857,0.0059589497,0.00621557,0.001689039,0.0020937836,0.0062684705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011657666,0.000039260307,0.00032801292,0.0008801166,0.000020583206,0.00029522262,0.011414694,0.00026046459,0.00021047815,0.41356793,0.41768482,0.15518188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055552605,0.0000048576817,0.000667513,0.000644906,0.0000060006455,0.00019376409,0.00280495,0.000052268504,0.00009434045,0.046850383,0.9486664,0.000009101191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012427132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027683616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01514979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047412943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002803231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050681114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321634372","doi":"10.1068/d2902tr","title":"1. Hegel Reads Spinoza","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025666694893232783,"score_gpt":0.22018079493600656,"score_spread":0.19451410004277378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321634372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003124281,0.11513146,0.0023609642,0.3079962,0.03444831,0.000036017263,0.0004942232,0.00020713333,0.5362015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121217646,0.038019866,0.002178825,0.16438404,0.019874252,0.00012375432,0.00040770613,0.00039993098,0.653394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936694,0.00015634045,0.000029054843,0.00016208024,0.00017964326,0.00010589274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993087,0.0003036956,0.000073655305,0.000047381378,0.00021887437,0.000047778456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008265604,0.00071293436,0.0005866356,0.0010737721,0.0036211212,0.002944093,0.0006560514,0.0034063528,0.0175728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033274228,0.00026639455,0.00022553395,0.0009755664,0.0048803356,0.0056585777,0.0018330651,0.005927272,0.007794906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040768584,0.000010824885,0.00015829087,0.00013084385,0.0000044023354,0.000051042156,0.0017169914,0.000034651333,0.0000548219,0.48947605,0.49357155,0.014749674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006627665,0.0000076290057,0.00029913278,0.00020454527,0.000003912284,0.00007181577,0.0005834626,0.000025906716,0.00008190487,0.05295613,0.9457497,0.000009240699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011058728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019316427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0175728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021027264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015354399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05878687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324172065","doi":"10.7202/1007027ar","title":"[Benedictus de] Spinoza, Oeuvres. I. Premiers Écrits. Édition critique et notes sous la direction de Pierre-François Moreau. Introductions de Filippo Mignini. Traduction par Michelle Beyssade et Joël Ganault. Notes par Michelle Beyssade et Filippo Mignini. Introduction générale à la nouvelle édition des Oeuvres complètes par Pierre-François Moreau. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France (coll. « Épiméthée »), 2009 [1670], 479 p.","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.026523558489129143,"score_gpt":0.26158881799568245,"score_spread":0.23506525950655333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324172065","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032669248,0.54458493,0.0021021583,0.06703231,0.01545187,0.00003886909,0.0007293253,0.0001375883,0.36665592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11439567,0.3077276,0.0031872045,0.019141192,0.013089421,0.00019711615,0.000906251,0.00055576133,0.54079986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900925,0.00025384076,0.000051927844,0.00017237868,0.00040682848,0.000105721265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993206,0.0002728549,0.00008912883,0.000061867395,0.00021233209,0.000043241886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075049454,0.0011565974,0.0005011363,0.0022333867,0.0026650273,0.004295978,0.00078688795,0.0016104078,0.026505623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016963409,0.00040754065,0.00043518585,0.0031754181,0.0037840824,0.0040068664,0.0013505477,0.0035045224,0.0084925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005805577,0.000017118788,0.00037902547,0.0005941609,0.000010445541,0.000074026306,0.0047968063,0.000058830152,0.000304281,0.24439947,0.68474054,0.064567216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027035755,0.0000035801634,0.00077497464,0.00024074463,0.0000029881394,0.00003944139,0.0006938635,0.000011837463,0.00006826447,0.0074122646,0.99074477,0.000004513992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026944678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057391185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026944678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056483857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030818516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088670135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328483916","doi":"10.1017/s147924431400064x","title":"MALCOLM’S<i>LEVIATHAN</i>: HOBBES’S “THING”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Intellectual History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Political philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Natural law; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Politics; Subject matter; Intellectual history; Law; Epistemology; Classics; History; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.058571422995557586,"score_gpt":0.20154155256975728,"score_spread":0.1429701295741997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328483916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0082327165,0.23150346,0.007039808,0.20693801,0.018325314,0.00002226286,0.00015294513,0.00014833694,0.5276371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48178875,0.08583572,0.0063185296,0.053929105,0.021093711,0.0001272021,0.00019668021,0.00057565165,0.35013458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902785,0.0004937885,0.000026712161,0.000109238,0.00026821427,0.00007420065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992066,0.00044700806,0.000073788025,0.00007333232,0.0001207847,0.00007855376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008317722,0.00049953314,0.00029790506,0.0012730508,0.0031506305,0.004777539,0.0004990049,0.0014083486,0.0037414995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031980765,0.00022557242,0.00019670729,0.00097351545,0.009817495,0.0040307622,0.0015503169,0.0037272875,0.0014190739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025648154,0.000008827566,0.0002219814,0.00010671689,0.0000055140545,0.000089056855,0.007406027,0.000053388296,0.00025724937,0.6853671,0.28246287,0.023995718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002717981,0.000006500528,0.0004449273,0.00023956885,0.00000262831,0.000081680155,0.0012604638,0.00006281555,0.00017553192,0.08478153,0.9129339,0.0000077504765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006139707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011506988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006139707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003032126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016518374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021999776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328636456","doi":"10.1086/669489","title":"Kisner, Matthew J. <i>Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. 261. $85.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Personal autonomy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07001448226231942,"score_gpt":0.25889457218199013,"score_spread":0.1888800899196707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328636456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004330516,0.8305954,0.0015787885,0.074951954,0.008151696,0.00001538624,0.00024596092,0.00014658466,0.08388123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032485984,0.7350587,0.0022534176,0.018615277,0.007243531,0.000068068024,0.00031229906,0.00038628533,0.2035764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993637,0.00016527962,0.000063566076,0.000089388304,0.00024089197,0.00007715739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978021,0.001151877,0.00018381917,0.00011902908,0.00052862003,0.00021457954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011808359,0.0012671086,0.00088931154,0.0031715354,0.0025886365,0.0037830235,0.0015260079,0.0029132515,0.032191273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003266072,0.0010389027,0.00044681085,0.0032802692,0.005913566,0.015170842,0.0022706902,0.0058411537,0.015838418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026933241,0.000011623182,0.00012601976,0.0003621909,0.000008812137,0.000054474967,0.0014760112,0.000065574946,0.00007836073,0.05593192,0.8988826,0.04297537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008076156,0.000007045472,0.0009271902,0.0011359344,0.000013401104,0.00020424882,0.0015072828,0.000042235675,0.00013463522,0.057957467,0.93804467,0.000017736114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015390064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03072989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032191273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036321797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003015104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10769057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332157463","doi":"10.2307/1261672","title":": <i>Hugo Grotius: De imperio summarum potestatum circa sacra</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Brill; History; Index (typography); Classics; Harm; Theology; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023208702060337677,"score_gpt":0.22979691890259885,"score_spread":0.20658821684226117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332157463","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001864972,0.75987196,0.0010382211,0.096947454,0.016335975,0.000019455954,0.0005098773,0.00011323947,0.123298846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12053901,0.35554305,0.0028340498,0.050427932,0.028952263,0.000102353864,0.0009388709,0.00067852275,0.439984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996325,0.000115664254,0.000014068192,0.00006399305,0.0001163554,0.00005746063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997613,0.000089974936,0.000047314767,0.000014340507,0.000047277957,0.00003979575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004346699,0.00093007897,0.0003226585,0.0013405955,0.0018953624,0.0031330853,0.0008027866,0.0018706797,0.030319495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001234758,0.00029145787,0.00016333896,0.0026725752,0.0024675746,0.0050716135,0.0016857248,0.0020491984,0.008400461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022661716,0.000004738435,0.00014807456,0.00019127436,0.000004392893,0.00006392869,0.0021792252,0.000020180001,0.00012577584,0.02931945,0.9401653,0.027755015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031377263,0.0000039472243,0.0007902508,0.00027795378,0.0000023879602,0.00010432306,0.0009788102,0.000010404272,0.00011045538,0.0053334786,0.9923781,0.0000067705437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027493605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06278177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030319495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019292855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012850233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10142875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339594322","doi":"10.1177/0090591716640471","title":"Book Review: <i>Leo Strauss on the Borders of Judaism, Philosophy, and History</i> , by Jeffrey A. Bernstein","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Judaism; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.03154044214282961,"score_gpt":0.24574529758044317,"score_spread":0.21420485543761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339594322","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000107904256,0.72397095,0.0002878487,0.14582556,0.10208582,0.000020089454,0.00032872133,0.00005520279,0.027317846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028390451,0.6199612,0.00036935444,0.10193948,0.09579664,0.00007337848,0.00050341734,0.00015945538,0.17835806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900025,0.00017228577,0.000053553198,0.00014109591,0.000561088,0.00007172151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513227,0.0022299597,0.00026625223,0.000119597054,0.0018519007,0.00040006035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011736847,0.0009146154,0.0013594701,0.0028344241,0.0014010933,0.0046197856,0.0016116227,0.003244768,0.031406607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00807292,0.000484786,0.0004911974,0.004874152,0.0020021715,0.0040531675,0.0015319269,0.0052691987,0.023719884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024564429,0.0000010937804,0.000009270811,0.00013354355,0.0000014316053,0.0000034840518,0.00000976196,0.000011299013,0.000010726283,0.000835634,0.9918675,0.007113807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029905611,0.0000025738977,0.000092685776,0.0004707571,0.0000025540526,0.000032449992,0.00002397715,0.000010306043,0.000014320879,0.0010186762,0.99832433,0.0000043746372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013161145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032148942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031406607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039617755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065915077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105065584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2363313827","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000068","title":"The Erotic Political Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Materialism; Realm; Political philosophy; Human sexuality; Epistemology; Politics; Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.046462375305951875,"score_gpt":0.25417193329683674,"score_spread":0.20770955799088486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2363313827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029801954,0.01366314,0.02428621,0.083789445,0.0018121802,0.000027578159,0.000043181954,0.000063091764,0.8465131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434712,0.003659749,0.0034373323,0.0052390094,0.0008375666,0.0000515356,0.000013823237,0.00007544075,0.043214276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961333,0.0029187363,0.000045260233,0.00019662625,0.0004905693,0.00021558664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982132,0.001168057,0.00010243202,0.0001372899,0.00020752192,0.0001714779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033479293,0.00029742744,0.00033634124,0.0013022262,0.006228983,0.0063856244,0.00047330966,0.0023643677,0.0040797945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037396834,0.0001867676,0.00021458449,0.00092928356,0.043972746,0.0032037208,0.002284425,0.003357229,0.0006344501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029617263,0.0000019168392,0.000014612244,0.0000063504935,5.9155553e-7,0.000015298305,0.0032877962,0.000046114437,0.000028047521,0.9946956,0.0012153598,0.0006854028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074015443,0.000008648109,0.00010348186,0.00012059999,0.0000028467541,0.000067587265,0.0049331156,0.00030322128,0.00016048002,0.8057755,0.18850787,0.000009187384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00642433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069522248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00642433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005783053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027649952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041959167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396110617","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.4","title":"Leo Strauss, <i>Natural Right and History</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Relativism; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Sociology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.039298873465536996,"score_gpt":0.18567430429847223,"score_spread":0.14637543083293525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396110617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009004618,0.10495245,0.0024316758,0.060499683,0.0027241858,0.000019065184,0.00009598346,0.000051377177,0.82022095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46405232,0.0639552,0.00174535,0.013624245,0.003080216,0.00007836197,0.00013143425,0.00021133512,0.45312154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994623,0.0002568605,0.000010838918,0.000052759242,0.00016547699,0.000051725667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964,0.00023224905,0.000022097023,0.00001649265,0.000056633962,0.000032662952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057133747,0.00027298878,0.00018072886,0.00091390294,0.0020267572,0.0026940077,0.00030946158,0.00089327415,0.0046485392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013072734,0.000122751,0.00011115815,0.00081665284,0.0072901053,0.0026012643,0.0009980705,0.0022518998,0.0014343618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008533264,0.000006207768,0.00010604299,0.000071193834,0.0000013745707,0.000028647462,0.004156309,0.00014839724,0.00010506987,0.91687554,0.06554909,0.012943643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024869764,0.000007843367,0.00025478384,0.00034403134,0.0000015241575,0.000058076086,0.001502069,0.00010666069,0.00016850626,0.09158681,0.90596217,0.0000051323254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012260027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021727916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012260027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048672277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002550746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03531438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412268032","doi":"","title":"Ordo naturae-ordo politicus et ordo iuridicus en la Filosofía Política de Niccolò Machiavelli","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Strategist; Power (physics); Philosophy; Humanities; Political philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012222792046226881,"score_gpt":0.26503682696681147,"score_spread":0.2528140349205846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412268032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16584165,0.03211886,0.0030373316,0.03981259,0.00065117015,0.000026419615,0.00003848356,0.00004625061,0.7584273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262193,0.0048536425,0.0010830034,0.0010069803,0.00019163851,0.000042843683,0.000012944046,0.00003267586,0.06655683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935275,0.00033269875,0.00001536681,0.00007486118,0.000095718235,0.00012859456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997292,0.00014462839,0.000052002546,0.000020634156,0.000023998758,0.000029582752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009540507,0.00018280325,0.00017912957,0.0008147493,0.0041917153,0.0041710483,0.00030827575,0.0010834588,0.0025618747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016084962,0.00013601274,0.00009511223,0.00083790993,0.007282442,0.0016924638,0.002036267,0.0023230475,0.00029189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026767166,0.00000867183,0.0011508206,0.00004979854,0.0000015728456,0.000100854595,0.033515982,0.00010339626,0.00015797684,0.94238424,0.003674261,0.018825661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084796675,0.000016440192,0.007574864,0.00037512303,0.0000054396196,0.00016805193,0.017145175,0.0004144046,0.00034518837,0.057474215,0.9164587,0.00001381383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021354567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04436279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021354567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008388744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022590721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060864866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472491776","doi":"10.3138/uram.30.3.178","title":"Materialistic Motionalism or Motional Materialism: Hobbes's Conception of Ultimate Reality and Meaning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10324627503442432,"score_gpt":0.3101418679244548,"score_spread":0.20689559289003048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472491776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026279746,0.00960521,0.09225562,0.04012725,0.0019290417,0.00009123164,0.00015714647,0.000095334435,0.8294594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92520946,0.0022593085,0.009707232,0.003396445,0.0014462181,0.00024863525,0.0000808336,0.00013883263,0.05751302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821943,0.0010024607,0.000058343616,0.000270402,0.00024483993,0.00020450665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881315,0.0006983796,0.00009071462,0.00017568507,0.00012624613,0.00009582397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034841741,0.00089328905,0.0007871542,0.001774992,0.006223964,0.008572398,0.0020653629,0.005057279,0.006475783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003474045,0.00064726133,0.00079930515,0.0017529208,0.059892282,0.012557874,0.004509632,0.008404509,0.000683291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013760927,0.000001239661,0.0000031554337,0.0000037968189,4.4049685e-7,0.000003847147,0.0006910543,0.000016350914,0.00000870197,0.99889356,0.00021064813,0.00016594763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007513716,0.000005828413,0.000033683646,0.000027747206,0.0000026127823,0.00001719508,0.0006628391,0.00014376835,0.00005113455,0.98114854,0.017894397,0.0000047369613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003317439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031018797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008572398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005761399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002623323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04180205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474551991","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.812371","title":"Spinoza on essence and ideal individuation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Individuation; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Simple (philosophy); Object (grammar); Ideal (ethics); Property (philosophy); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.04373868343928102,"score_gpt":0.21872080797610954,"score_spread":0.17498212453682851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474551991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06828609,0.013057492,0.07542408,0.043369893,0.0010811809,0.000059898626,0.00014109905,0.00012407827,0.7984562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95537376,0.0024509889,0.010203006,0.0040019862,0.00035938632,0.00007654944,0.000044052143,0.00006577123,0.027424295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980792,0.0008929346,0.00006287761,0.00031400964,0.00035915512,0.00029187245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918956,0.0003392887,0.00007662936,0.00014836328,0.00014015174,0.00010597152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027027258,0.00037186427,0.00048685624,0.0014535222,0.004081164,0.0045865932,0.0006255729,0.0016511179,0.0035302055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002551507,0.00020460483,0.000563483,0.0007266361,0.026696773,0.007831161,0.0041078455,0.00342775,0.00043915986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020132948,0.0000011174416,0.00002433673,0.0000032854932,4.7026376e-7,0.0000049297014,0.00026657456,0.00002308037,0.000010909218,0.9990392,0.00021406799,0.00041010784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004239055,0.0000035637067,0.00009724421,0.0000124904345,0.0000020501545,0.000020850024,0.00026833912,0.00012415586,0.000040031682,0.9802169,0.019206502,0.00000366547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005138953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038948394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005138953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048218304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022347015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034985065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475870862","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206088.003.0016","title":"Publishing a Banned Philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Scope (computer science); Classics; History; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07592542596973119,"score_gpt":0.20622355373996654,"score_spread":0.13029812777023536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475870862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033277427,0.024333915,0.0026225795,0.044111453,0.0095952805,0.0000147463425,0.00015519765,0.00017534032,0.9156637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1150382,0.01535448,0.0019592845,0.014782435,0.0049063605,0.00005617809,0.00025695653,0.00036285244,0.8472833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737704,0.0007618317,0.000113014365,0.00044099573,0.0010755452,0.00023152007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970187,0.0010685442,0.0001806311,0.0007776071,0.00056106766,0.00039338923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023285742,0.00046574866,0.0005486426,0.0016372334,0.005170634,0.012864771,0.0007883576,0.0028593906,0.032449376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051073506,0.00033570023,0.00035273845,0.0015196146,0.013187269,0.009195692,0.0039575007,0.008162817,0.009462994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001551834,0.000012089338,0.000055820354,0.00006269561,0.0000024927117,0.00005271867,0.0018509552,0.000027523722,0.00018453115,0.9011112,0.08065053,0.015973954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004555362,0.0000045254974,0.000062840525,0.000118080214,0.0000021893832,0.000031613814,0.0003556873,0.000034322624,0.000083534804,0.04171663,0.95758355,0.000002479061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005605766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008533903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032449376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00761078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071898624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108553946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476773167","doi":"10.2307/2586389","title":"Machiavelli's Romans: Liberty and Greatness in <i>The Discourses on Livy</i>. By J. Patrick Coby. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999. 267p. $65.00 cloth, $23.95 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Greatness; Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Literature; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019888506426649872,"score_gpt":0.2791265363852186,"score_spread":0.25923802995856876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476773167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008900034,0.17671686,0.0023475708,0.16157785,0.0011509551,0.000015359296,0.00006747528,0.00004485056,0.64917904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7884416,0.055671223,0.0019308429,0.014020319,0.0026603874,0.00009233854,0.000057997368,0.00014020492,0.1369851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912804,0.0005125122,0.000023724308,0.00008682245,0.000120408105,0.0001285258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990553,0.00058897753,0.00012212229,0.00008382215,0.000059010115,0.00009079703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014128959,0.00048785828,0.0004523734,0.0009624651,0.005335866,0.0054175598,0.0006956255,0.002400093,0.0073118475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034910534,0.0004073362,0.00026134477,0.0009692915,0.0190058,0.008005259,0.002660485,0.005475368,0.0011565953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014512356,0.0000061121714,0.000106268126,0.000039405324,0.0000025523195,0.000040716634,0.007889206,0.00002942318,0.00002632868,0.94426304,0.03895044,0.008632028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017352477,0.000014270164,0.0012060029,0.00030925067,0.000004600247,0.00016269251,0.0048885755,0.000089786605,0.00007735448,0.5527106,0.44050992,0.000009615867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006204187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013132897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073118475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033205163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014956639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024460554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481345471","doi":"10.1057/9781403978592_2","title":"Esoteric Philosophy and Ancient Wisdom","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Key (lock); Political philosophy; Domain (mathematical analysis); Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.040313222612537135,"score_gpt":0.2299373053545626,"score_spread":0.18962408274202547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481345471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0080513805,0.032008156,0.0058978656,0.024015846,0.0007449211,0.000012993537,0.000042233616,0.000042107935,0.9291845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60243034,0.02998925,0.007941852,0.011041835,0.0018925691,0.000077959296,0.00009182302,0.00014592228,0.3463885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900514,0.00051977,0.0000251063,0.000093298295,0.00026347372,0.00009327953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999173,0.00046010362,0.000047064532,0.00009491651,0.00014270564,0.000082220286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012450608,0.00040708267,0.0002829301,0.0014116076,0.0037437608,0.0039174054,0.00050084357,0.0015175504,0.00607196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021521286,0.0001771994,0.00018394692,0.0012679333,0.025440445,0.005054624,0.0019742309,0.00390924,0.0016550102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002904138,0.000003280592,0.00002533509,0.000014296223,9.124212e-7,0.000014071735,0.0019248967,0.000055803706,0.00001393755,0.9886613,0.00531119,0.003972149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004138551,0.0000053379385,0.00011435121,0.00011271393,0.000001083551,0.000049939765,0.00092583377,0.000110557245,0.00003914509,0.7779373,0.22069633,0.0000032399798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051719104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009445074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00607196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050802445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003377643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03685987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484168493","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498084.005","title":"Of Human Freedom and Necessity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Philosophy; Position (finance); Epistemology","score_opus":0.047233303428821434,"score_gpt":0.2131249194646082,"score_spread":0.16589161603578678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484168493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009434456,0.025567546,0.015200207,0.038273387,0.0012524443,0.000042056963,0.00014974643,0.000053101743,0.9100269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8238562,0.012570982,0.006535804,0.014757436,0.002439719,0.00022891306,0.00020679271,0.00009786947,0.13930625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964619,0.0016338341,0.00012275779,0.00068615814,0.0006205736,0.00047487553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865985,0.00065375975,0.00011002966,0.0002454116,0.00018347854,0.00014747583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030863495,0.0005498954,0.0006347912,0.0013605321,0.0050850403,0.0061942963,0.0006571478,0.0031661172,0.00970119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037417302,0.00022804481,0.00062059885,0.0007884308,0.03979018,0.008271837,0.005229368,0.0044717244,0.0013755609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001970434,0.0000010718132,0.000022959995,0.000007955531,7.8373733e-7,0.000005518656,0.00036226673,0.000016363014,0.000011453834,0.9971163,0.001410276,0.0010431511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004584151,0.000007330721,0.0001689298,0.000059995913,0.0000018808115,0.000046151265,0.0004220533,0.000058693025,0.000041366333,0.8837554,0.115428306,0.0000053031326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031643587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002862436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00970119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051209102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037932068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037154913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485108717","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_33","title":"Grading Basic Distinctions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Computer science; Natural language processing; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1404751770227395,"score_gpt":0.2705116743120611,"score_spread":0.13003649728932157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485108717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012720103,0.0006217964,0.08268129,0.0023190496,0.0017160876,0.0005670088,0.0029196227,0.0029924873,0.8934626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19354168,0.0011201332,0.14737508,0.0011739299,0.00064968807,0.00058625726,0.009040798,0.0023405459,0.64417195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974498,0.00039293023,0.00018765462,0.00052775047,0.0011379706,0.00030396905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958301,0.0008591569,0.00014260566,0.0009627282,0.0018651622,0.0003401935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016280162,0.00077529973,0.0005642454,0.0035408894,0.0023689216,0.00550211,0.0021047646,0.0012809638,0.13705277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00942485,0.0004409567,0.00068084436,0.002939503,0.0019601162,0.007854573,0.0034809704,0.0032032062,0.049322583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013160345,0.00011504115,0.00084633427,0.0001982776,0.000008447207,0.00009732226,0.001048457,0.00026298608,0.0032541784,0.52669233,0.15111391,0.316231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018979761,0.00004735305,0.0014404947,0.00021109953,0.00002058156,0.00016220192,0.0009533291,0.0014144245,0.0036652759,0.31343293,0.67860216,0.000031041596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029027106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065900153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13705277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002256767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019268704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4584872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485727393","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.001.0001","title":"The Riddle of Hume's Treatise","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Orthodoxy; Philosophy; Naturalism; Schism; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.05187080982651297,"score_gpt":0.21270371358760481,"score_spread":0.16083290376109183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485727393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008827398,0.040152278,0.0073583927,0.20256697,0.007240305,0.00003309556,0.00016431097,0.00012519542,0.73353213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67983705,0.019408451,0.0036520257,0.07249751,0.013871194,0.00024725962,0.00020196357,0.00046036686,0.20982409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864543,0.008724261,0.0002168514,0.00068310165,0.0030561474,0.0008653912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510276,0.0031366358,0.00028362652,0.00035239838,0.00085901626,0.00026556395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007185949,0.0006017536,0.0007255763,0.0027687121,0.007941772,0.011177526,0.0015352878,0.005353014,0.0047751497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012722283,0.00032552055,0.00042045073,0.0021882597,0.026678298,0.006657967,0.004844028,0.008613153,0.0013719831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006581325,0.0000058200308,0.0000234397,0.000035061308,0.0000034519458,0.000033998014,0.0018291487,0.0000925363,0.000024281833,0.9439789,0.050679367,0.0032874006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008810722,0.000008925451,0.00013091747,0.00042775273,0.000004541746,0.00005029228,0.0015587157,0.00018623211,0.00018824953,0.34558958,0.6518276,0.000018379149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009115002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009117539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011177526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009339098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005697146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06776017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489215326","doi":"10.1057/9781403907691_8","title":"Afterword: Toward the Future","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.045715811031147996,"score_gpt":0.22397772178299918,"score_spread":0.1782619107518512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489215326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047680823,0.026835632,0.0015428226,0.28015316,0.17281628,0.000067206274,0.0005402587,0.00039427774,0.5171736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003463488,0.0071657635,0.000694424,0.032837886,0.01309282,0.00005008316,0.00029645782,0.00021706369,0.94218206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993742,0.00013618603,0.000030432306,0.00009778895,0.00025350598,0.00010793368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813396,0.00019070921,0.00007440952,0.00013047823,0.0010111845,0.00045933158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358524,0.0006297766,0.00044129224,0.0007568997,0.0029161244,0.007963988,0.0011874071,0.0042899046,0.22549076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039136615,0.00020263791,0.00043824126,0.00085445715,0.0015068414,0.009587562,0.0029120967,0.0063047735,0.1910019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006730773,0.0000069471926,0.000027506043,0.000052034327,7.064544e-7,0.000020567231,0.00013300996,0.000009852834,0.000047137983,0.018968401,0.9605729,0.020154137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.3898564e-7,0.0000025650065,0.000034702898,0.000083765175,5.951788e-7,0.000018852728,0.00017352327,0.0000055662113,0.00001766455,0.0022062482,0.9974541,0.0000015329389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037897471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006066607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22549076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024241875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030766844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7543417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491045779","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511676246.004","title":"Tolstoy's peaceable kingdom","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.05341782389349389,"score_gpt":0.21743137976741692,"score_spread":0.16401355587392302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491045779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009510998,0.009017202,0.00071236485,0.008049255,0.0011359267,0.000021837524,0.000110731424,0.000052827083,0.9713888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21982367,0.0070587834,0.0005217468,0.0028251023,0.000326058,0.000027272372,0.000112112386,0.000085918895,0.7692194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997497,0.00004273293,0.0000061303494,0.00003936911,0.00006727733,0.000094733405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987066,0.000036623984,0.00001140862,0.00001819804,0.000020962381,0.00004209979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002694568,0.00024474727,0.00017936542,0.00045124136,0.0042478046,0.0040097297,0.00034125798,0.001016017,0.020689296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007257617,0.00018141845,0.00014800165,0.00044495435,0.0055789277,0.0025381723,0.002903492,0.0034243178,0.0024883067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060064747,0.000016345946,0.00024010599,0.00009153375,0.0000025835186,0.0002919166,0.015470927,0.00012367131,0.00034623666,0.8394878,0.111388795,0.032480065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051191187,0.000007000036,0.00026202842,0.0000803335,0.0000012806453,0.00007896933,0.0014764224,0.000017917819,0.00008579295,0.009736553,0.98824537,0.0000032351033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034485836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068323575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034485836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007175224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043762135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069212615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496965207","doi":"10.1522/030140085","title":"Sur la theorie kantienne de la liberte","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.021603717197062475,"score_gpt":0.23527487301550246,"score_spread":0.21367115581843998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496965207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008422236,0.027326316,0.017916286,0.028781245,0.0006789892,0.0000149504685,0.000082676015,0.00005332826,0.91672397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.733075,0.019568432,0.008737469,0.0050526387,0.0010584049,0.00013103615,0.00012186755,0.00020961015,0.23204553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985311,0.0007914736,0.000038770842,0.00018115493,0.00027229352,0.00018506432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987218,0.0008301202,0.000079284044,0.00017056393,0.00013809552,0.00006012063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026285658,0.0006061678,0.00036598806,0.0012598976,0.003920585,0.005047727,0.0009212669,0.0021745532,0.009965563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029384955,0.00035325703,0.0005146901,0.0015817877,0.028775455,0.008059354,0.0028814825,0.006131934,0.0015699735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001891449,8.688272e-7,0.000021019407,0.000008225221,0.0000010714475,0.000007102007,0.0008566918,0.00006612798,0.000008293179,0.9963104,0.0015987002,0.0011196798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006573843,0.0000034360207,0.0001847444,0.00010323754,0.0000033105646,0.00004299507,0.0007761143,0.00018679023,0.000058992693,0.8970932,0.101534545,0.0000061364835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009024581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014888988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009965563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065974365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00456331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047867954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498578434","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498084.009","title":"The Vocation of Humankind Revisited, 1800: Conclusion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Contemplation; Action (physics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Physics","score_opus":0.041778666799012466,"score_gpt":0.2165671200867183,"score_spread":0.17478845328770584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498578434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016644225,0.04706296,0.0017221946,0.054782204,0.0023409452,0.000020303813,0.00008632969,0.000022368535,0.87731856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75367737,0.02636063,0.0014845548,0.027328186,0.0029673292,0.00009338696,0.00012144162,0.000119234326,0.18784781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934727,0.00033569633,0.000015180167,0.000099005345,0.000106353065,0.0000965462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995572,0.00023812818,0.000029702545,0.00003528755,0.00007781158,0.00006189804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011129613,0.00045994602,0.0002824894,0.0010507626,0.003541262,0.005808292,0.00059129513,0.0022091696,0.008004709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016630169,0.000120317614,0.0002242352,0.001490852,0.022956379,0.007971507,0.0028049562,0.005050628,0.0009794538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057819793,0.0000057942,0.00008335826,0.000027433483,8.768372e-7,0.0000352815,0.0074372296,0.0000416106,0.000016423593,0.97834146,0.009966769,0.0040378408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060666666,0.00000506902,0.00048245353,0.00027808713,0.0000023970401,0.000097390555,0.013082149,0.00007280317,0.00012226631,0.47667548,0.5091679,0.000007930896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011457488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00953592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011457488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007035254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032565997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051044583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500888408","doi":"","title":"The Constellations of Empiricism, New Science, and Mind in Hobbes, Locke, and Hume","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Empiricism; Architecture; Epistemology; Passion; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15396086838569376,"score_gpt":0.31544202278488576,"score_spread":0.161481154399192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500888408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15979831,0.038657874,0.10957764,0.14740647,0.0027564734,0.00011999007,0.0001129237,0.00017477793,0.5413956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973859,0.002707214,0.009323149,0.0040250793,0.0005654333,0.000131669,0.00002458509,0.00006639684,0.009297414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947054,0.0040766713,0.00009460943,0.0003815288,0.00049544335,0.00024633703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513346,0.0038788633,0.00024371549,0.00034021825,0.00021235584,0.00019142643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054943273,0.0006144716,0.00056652626,0.0024053953,0.0056180065,0.008981968,0.0008146053,0.0030941349,0.0021769209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085374825,0.00044960785,0.00037556337,0.0017282943,0.0743876,0.01384009,0.0040497235,0.0052965917,0.000338391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114584645,0.0000051663505,0.0001176814,0.000020595635,0.0000022595375,0.000033522083,0.017508669,0.00009542098,0.000039056966,0.9793411,0.0008150682,0.0020100465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098731725,0.000010838429,0.00023292833,0.00008618916,0.0000027778506,0.000060497474,0.007127199,0.00033412472,0.00010080599,0.95944697,0.032577034,0.000010756752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002939911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028012586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008981968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048112753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001863016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034908414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501383000","doi":"10.1057/9781403978592_3","title":"Philosophy’s Hidden Revolt against God","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Obedience; Revelation; Philosophy; Aside; Philosophy of religion; Islam; Morality and religion; Epistemology; Religious studies; Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.0450374058521051,"score_gpt":0.2369015039621136,"score_spread":0.19186409811000849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501383000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125210015,0.021411752,0.011039618,0.071541056,0.001546416,0.000018933499,0.000070159425,0.000104715546,0.8817464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78014725,0.00970171,0.004357565,0.014190575,0.0018649778,0.000047080644,0.000070019356,0.00014176262,0.18947913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872416,0.0006774879,0.000021879776,0.00015398493,0.0003206825,0.000101667916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991985,0.00038701302,0.00005687334,0.00014968462,0.00011003189,0.00009798991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017392087,0.00035344248,0.00031683993,0.00063199864,0.0032504266,0.0040850425,0.00051233283,0.0015216324,0.00570038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023361838,0.0002506748,0.0002785319,0.00066839333,0.026013829,0.0044161747,0.002260685,0.00513652,0.0015406763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052262208,0.0000034579664,0.00004918862,0.000016188913,0.0000016305204,0.0000139131635,0.002164029,0.00005356546,0.000040944804,0.98374116,0.009531249,0.0043794224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066858283,0.000013807735,0.00027196071,0.00010935351,0.0000024078875,0.00007224545,0.00096997083,0.00019216038,0.00014580975,0.6229505,0.37526074,0.0000042590864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014725015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024303822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00570038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033157049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023031158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02405721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509919346","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n7p119","title":"The Critique of Leo Strauss to Modernist Political Thought","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Politics; Epistemology; Morality; Certainty; Political philosophy; Nihilism; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04155837880000607,"score_gpt":0.2911331605203005,"score_spread":0.24957478172029446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509919346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01776971,0.024741523,0.06989766,0.5925969,0.0034681961,0.000066242865,0.0001496104,0.00021172654,0.2910985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7876315,0.0121485945,0.021025889,0.11147618,0.008703825,0.00033623283,0.00006852104,0.00029812675,0.058311217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99181026,0.004155896,0.00019648405,0.0009296961,0.0024568907,0.0004508279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916951,0.0054257675,0.0005787599,0.00053787295,0.0014452619,0.00031726854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00667708,0.0005304372,0.00072153116,0.0026376545,0.00418928,0.005353268,0.0015477475,0.005753039,0.002658569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01536172,0.00034798915,0.00080687593,0.002019526,0.044665314,0.0062627257,0.0031025328,0.010134993,0.00097302906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036294173,0.0000026453922,0.00003956765,0.000016141092,0.0000020532646,0.000008610865,0.0010523773,0.00010013419,0.000014319675,0.99074227,0.0062771714,0.0017410873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008295106,0.00000935234,0.00008189343,0.00009163655,0.0000024604196,0.0000329723,0.000391934,0.0003771397,0.00006380811,0.92117083,0.0777617,0.000008003807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010659695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008792975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010659695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01002109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008017556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07270843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514992111","doi":"10.22439/fs.v0i0.5012","title":"Foucault Among the Stoics: Oikeiosis and Counter-Conduct","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foucault Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Relation (database); Transcendence (philosophy); Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Cicero; Natural law; Sociology; Political science; Classics; History","score_opus":0.13655010419285507,"score_gpt":0.3083052965659935,"score_spread":0.1717551923731384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514992111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08708342,0.01922607,0.06065845,0.08957942,0.002052232,0.00007337055,0.000038199858,0.000117342905,0.7411716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95816356,0.0025430967,0.00693684,0.0069607524,0.00037032782,0.00009802347,0.000011550775,0.00009154987,0.024824306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994961,0.0035121592,0.000084160725,0.0004110879,0.000689732,0.00034184643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972613,0.0018016446,0.00020037852,0.0002868842,0.00027340266,0.00017627508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684868,0.00037743707,0.00042899413,0.0014287097,0.006782691,0.0060875597,0.0006111565,0.0030541876,0.002028192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066880886,0.000202779,0.00045656218,0.00076414703,0.059747335,0.007379211,0.00458312,0.0054738983,0.00037170583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000407463,0.000003917808,0.000073983785,0.0000083648565,0.0000011418817,0.0000265304,0.0042283535,0.000049179453,0.000032408778,0.99316823,0.00070620363,0.0016976703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007153283,0.000015357087,0.0001280118,0.000085651125,0.0000033105748,0.000083022016,0.0025952547,0.00024073855,0.0001601951,0.92939305,0.06727819,0.000010109069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042211623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035833542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006782691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004986025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003365429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036176264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25352695","doi":"10.25071/1718-4657.36729","title":"“HE WHO IS UNABLE TO LIVE IN SOCIETY . . . MUST EITHER BE A BEAST OR A GOD”: SITUATING THE “INHUMAN” IN ARISTOTLE’S POLITICAL THOUGHT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections conference journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Essentialism; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Instinct; Sociology; Posthuman; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1357648049082522,"score_gpt":0.3021640168670838,"score_spread":0.16639921195883156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25352695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072613634,0.013118288,0.037703346,0.15064606,0.0025249473,0.00004777616,0.000076220305,0.0000863494,0.7231834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661953,0.002026391,0.0045697903,0.009155288,0.00069956173,0.000046943132,0.00003328113,0.00008276215,0.017190607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994449,0.0040436867,0.00007625445,0.00041326685,0.00056728895,0.0004505039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723995,0.0018421361,0.00023845094,0.00020041435,0.00028423732,0.00019476356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005462069,0.00046327102,0.00043003596,0.0013621392,0.011157568,0.0084561715,0.0011883016,0.0036257333,0.002106518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004247186,0.00032069764,0.00023634324,0.0011014579,0.070909366,0.011223555,0.0043577454,0.0064213723,0.00052882836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075703706,0.0000048059483,0.00010386162,0.000012687105,0.0000014163312,0.000060034643,0.045765366,0.000035903784,0.00004976823,0.9492826,0.0029766872,0.0016992765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014691448,0.000025584812,0.0005040503,0.00019819541,0.000008433629,0.00020443066,0.04369328,0.00049866014,0.00023912084,0.71032417,0.24425696,0.00003249527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015730191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021200692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015730191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057177064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037537783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04148507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554027602","doi":"10.4467/20844131ks.16.009.5329","title":"The renaissance of political realism in Early Modern Europe : Giovanni Botero and the discourse of \"Reason of State\"","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Realism; Classics; Historiography; Virtue; Literature; Philosophy; Humanities; Law; History; Epistemology; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.012131222969455378,"score_gpt":0.18709461493926535,"score_spread":0.17496339196980998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554027602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19743161,0.116684794,0.005038106,0.13746257,0.0014905598,0.000016740292,0.000034566197,0.000057084286,0.54178387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97885567,0.004887832,0.0005543812,0.00363583,0.00029653488,0.000016055663,0.000008916843,0.00003368862,0.011711267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980233,0.001306394,0.0000225025,0.0001925906,0.00020058823,0.0002546515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905354,0.00067110854,0.00008481702,0.00007588403,0.000053128286,0.00006158653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035565405,0.00028537778,0.0003220485,0.0012339918,0.0050896937,0.006900462,0.0006238998,0.003329745,0.0011062156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028147856,0.00022751662,0.00022890007,0.0011824521,0.025156192,0.0033550812,0.0027686066,0.00370801,0.00016977152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017832856,0.000007631351,0.00022892217,0.000028579941,0.0000028813806,0.0000760678,0.027001642,0.000093668736,0.000052603264,0.9652404,0.0037046832,0.003545114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003763646,0.00002986742,0.0032831207,0.0007523008,0.000014473634,0.00025321054,0.013615031,0.0005159572,0.00022264982,0.4300255,0.55121535,0.000034906498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016182035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016901137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016182035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009958241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024066565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07225239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557603865","doi":"10.1177/1354066116679244","title":"Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Attributive; Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Typology; State (computer science); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10019829356134309,"score_gpt":0.2927816586436426,"score_spread":0.1925833650822995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557603865","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03786707,0.0038447713,0.7746524,0.027647413,0.002007532,0.0002377928,0.00042233735,0.0011760629,0.15214461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77464706,0.0013763078,0.21053003,0.0029270258,0.000621775,0.00030450348,0.00046984243,0.00048939,0.008634125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911327,0.0066452106,0.00054211804,0.00078005716,0.0006066069,0.0002933505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898463,0.0071978713,0.0005765421,0.001104776,0.0010018556,0.0002726781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008872081,0.0010700327,0.0008111039,0.0025437763,0.0030585974,0.007763915,0.00186215,0.0035189812,0.00602204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019584425,0.0006790325,0.0013490526,0.0013932945,0.024245717,0.024923718,0.0040479293,0.0045189345,0.0012637929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012056507,0.0000049043556,0.00011804549,0.00006277928,0.0000093769995,0.000079551406,0.010049419,0.00024976555,0.00021343725,0.98446345,0.0010466382,0.003690472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000163901,0.000011570145,0.00014335244,0.00009430916,0.0000151019185,0.00010067173,0.0042692493,0.0030539988,0.0006191317,0.95677835,0.034874845,0.000023086253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029969823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019194154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008872081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026320345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013340019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046920598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559032116","doi":"","title":"Language and Curiosity in Hobbes’ Philosophical Anthropology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","keywords":"Curiosity; Anthropology; Philosophical anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.030427002592725044,"score_gpt":0.26897552471418545,"score_spread":0.2385485221214604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559032116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21709894,0.0283486,0.070242815,0.051610857,0.0009864155,0.00005065659,0.0000747086,0.00012781117,0.6314593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863002,0.0017813054,0.0035156193,0.0011985956,0.0002534131,0.000037597012,0.000012640878,0.000043578,0.006857113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968681,0.0023669335,0.00006817883,0.00023052351,0.00027702106,0.00018928506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981102,0.0014017383,0.000090851216,0.00015880147,0.00010395402,0.00013437777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004131642,0.0004384502,0.00045120696,0.0020921275,0.004988623,0.0048854914,0.0006436347,0.0019845285,0.0025239799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034224016,0.00030199144,0.00030501172,0.00096620544,0.0444626,0.0063371886,0.0042964458,0.002935609,0.00030506204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072270122,0.0000048561897,0.00009793682,0.000026708258,0.0000029952034,0.00006758429,0.024448423,0.00010758553,0.00010975309,0.9729134,0.00035920477,0.0018542927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001050091,0.0000109648,0.0003075531,0.000082221806,0.0000041980634,0.00011652311,0.007878485,0.00025711782,0.00013916429,0.9447713,0.04640873,0.00001329085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019273142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022612766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004988623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002566311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010112446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021850467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560342508","doi":"10.1080/00335630.2017.1266213","title":"Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020665981247692908,"score_gpt":0.22146315943528092,"score_spread":0.20079717818758802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560342508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021256095,0.009165062,0.027520487,0.11401536,0.0015293285,0.000029183137,0.00010686554,0.00022918051,0.82614833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315025,0.0014297427,0.006669921,0.008391753,0.0013583474,0.00008267385,0.00003152727,0.0002243952,0.050309047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257505,0.0047578462,0.00019086456,0.00079885003,0.0011413713,0.00053600955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851281,0.011232171,0.0005740028,0.001638406,0.0009857288,0.00044159885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008194611,0.00055001443,0.0005781926,0.0018178818,0.006407399,0.011435609,0.001256967,0.0069318237,0.010904132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019231811,0.00059249985,0.0004486758,0.0010521701,0.046692524,0.018526126,0.004027645,0.00900459,0.0018493306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096686945,0.000003275633,0.000018344108,0.000010274737,0.0000012409812,0.000006858197,0.00084581424,0.00006138688,0.000038948492,0.99673647,0.001344014,0.0009235661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016221045,0.0000052281866,0.000044109653,0.000029357818,0.0000030750286,0.00001583971,0.0004133364,0.00023379669,0.00013346104,0.9684974,0.03059838,0.00000993352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020201027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019010928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011435609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052351924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020964136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043337762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562642994","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198746775.003.0005","title":"Laws and Powers in the Frame of Nature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Relation (database); Law; Dilemma; Power (physics); Newton's laws of motion; Motion (physics); Focus (optics); Frame (networking); Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Physics; Classical mechanics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.025906351001966456,"score_gpt":0.21343735571896535,"score_spread":0.1875310047169989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562642994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010033573,0.015423005,0.017575048,0.009892893,0.0007382022,0.000020383883,0.000052654894,0.000048292866,0.946216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77269983,0.013734448,0.008889513,0.003496432,0.001908117,0.0001835327,0.000116861134,0.00014743287,0.1988239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866736,0.0006455968,0.000041467625,0.00017997708,0.00031467236,0.00015097742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990901,0.00053818786,0.00006184458,0.00013453125,0.000117877935,0.000057523455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018774896,0.0004885447,0.000374547,0.0013076377,0.0033477177,0.00487291,0.00058054365,0.0013756315,0.004520073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002054416,0.00022930898,0.000353581,0.0011186812,0.029122073,0.008568026,0.0020158659,0.0031470682,0.00082396215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.823348e-7,5.9949224e-7,0.0000060191405,0.0000035113721,2.1344366e-7,0.0000035754683,0.0004737447,0.000021737696,0.0000072608573,0.9986124,0.00035657862,0.0005137999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033917684,0.0000034904554,0.00006336515,0.000037367903,0.0000013812676,0.00001607264,0.0003735401,0.0000885982,0.000039451817,0.90338254,0.09598818,0.0000026767277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041950843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038051088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005694068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005694068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022748942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04131353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566391379","doi":"10.1515/agph-2015-0008","title":"On the Significance of Formal Causes in Spinoza’s Metaphysics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Causality (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.10791828889452777,"score_gpt":0.28472767351323763,"score_spread":0.17680938461870987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566391379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10881154,0.0037396373,0.37442,0.04190025,0.0013677824,0.00012260277,0.00030422423,0.0005149473,0.46881908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856938,0.0004489647,0.008234554,0.00061072945,0.00019767857,0.00006128698,0.000035752677,0.00004645132,0.004670857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975497,0.0013307796,0.000103719634,0.0003202248,0.00045487515,0.00024077666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994115,0.003734065,0.0004054733,0.00083194865,0.00070224865,0.00021129835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397203,0.00045321637,0.00049936987,0.002033398,0.0028285352,0.0056400606,0.00090391224,0.0016417768,0.0074418257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008685986,0.0003395197,0.0007907426,0.0010086673,0.024354635,0.00804052,0.0038136009,0.0029448841,0.0006110313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029217244,0.0000022380368,0.000041137057,0.000006674698,0.0000014730018,0.000009297963,0.00013592452,0.00016170897,0.000014059055,0.99903846,0.00013740826,0.00044873153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073355113,0.0000026579473,0.00006856859,0.0000095187925,0.0000036751103,0.000010613625,0.000094240284,0.00079348055,0.00005577171,0.9964635,0.0024872494,0.000003603876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034324639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002406074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074418257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038614005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026418678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028543472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568666897","doi":"10.1017/s0034670516000826","title":"Arthur Shuster : Punishment and the History of Political Philosophy. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016. Pp. ix, 192.)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Politics; Content (measure theory); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048573991346132724,"score_gpt":0.25667017933305675,"score_spread":0.20809618798692403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568666897","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035809804,0.95545614,0.000343575,0.021989193,0.0010457999,0.000004857154,0.00007863579,0.000015763933,0.020707838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053953525,0.8837963,0.0007498202,0.006767426,0.0030665323,0.000039697086,0.00017053039,0.000046128673,0.051410075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885714,0.00052793295,0.000058796148,0.00006881122,0.00034917906,0.00013812585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816847,0.0008740158,0.00023821316,0.00011016877,0.00043890305,0.00017014946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017135433,0.0011737646,0.00078051694,0.0038433871,0.0028942174,0.0034698662,0.0011890664,0.0028024337,0.015010255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004065463,0.0006733304,0.00037613162,0.0051048384,0.008705947,0.005553832,0.0014831737,0.0026966534,0.0033644952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042239706,0.00001241394,0.0004940251,0.0014187241,0.000029270812,0.00021199742,0.006551423,0.0003441662,0.0001014354,0.20332357,0.7104569,0.07701378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012715865,0.000010361465,0.0037453773,0.0019610238,0.000018017716,0.00017580549,0.002568891,0.0001018216,0.00009969586,0.07382877,0.91746014,0.00001732456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14368469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35765797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14368469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012625234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008511492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2856967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580846843","doi":"10.1017/s0018246x16000418","title":"HOBBES'S CONVENTIONALIST THEOLOGY, THE TRINITY, AND GOD AS AN ARTIFICIAL PERSON BY FICTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Historical Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Theism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Sincerity; Interpretation (philosophy); Theology; Natural theology; Convention; State of nature; Epistemology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.1096112984153532,"score_gpt":0.28713015995419233,"score_spread":0.1775188615388391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580846843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04220136,0.015531377,0.014297302,0.044571266,0.0028293952,0.000028362896,0.00006041548,0.000055180313,0.8804254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94622314,0.0030224822,0.0019259755,0.0028647962,0.0014095925,0.00005439768,0.000024083496,0.00004672837,0.044428803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981998,0.001334314,0.00003120674,0.00014401216,0.00017755403,0.000113071466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988801,0.0007332346,0.00007706785,0.00008992118,0.00014762656,0.000072003866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017881417,0.0003169281,0.0002537397,0.0011830882,0.003879992,0.0052290647,0.0004735635,0.001940568,0.0033107025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020871717,0.00017749735,0.00014351212,0.0006917847,0.045262873,0.0031360951,0.0014232309,0.003842009,0.0004276659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029538803,0.0000029159075,0.000017787203,0.0000084236135,5.452099e-7,0.000020606536,0.002609515,0.000028765886,0.000025905907,0.99484587,0.0018903519,0.00054630276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017531947,0.000028148484,0.00036943523,0.00022108248,0.000004803373,0.00012556881,0.00425711,0.0004343291,0.0002352088,0.6566502,0.33764336,0.0000132157975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037947008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042069596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006055329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006055329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014213272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043934643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589771262","doi":"10.1017/cco9780511791581","title":"The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Democracy; Deliberation; Economic Justice; Citizenship; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law; Political science; Ancient philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0410185013408587,"score_gpt":0.23436892670126633,"score_spread":0.19335042536040764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589771262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006216215,0.03375017,0.0018352611,0.013023976,0.0027481543,0.00001569641,0.000114828916,0.000055708613,0.9478345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04997572,0.019101173,0.0019090542,0.005084756,0.0034587006,0.000067627654,0.00015225672,0.00016193475,0.9200888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988979,0.00028725524,0.000034765726,0.00020996011,0.00045553225,0.00011455849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999297,0.0003476876,0.000032484768,0.00009228219,0.00016632811,0.00006413108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007488867,0.00064326765,0.00047703262,0.0020610972,0.0051105646,0.005840597,0.00052166614,0.0021751844,0.031126741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002079273,0.00033136737,0.0002604992,0.0020153308,0.010331082,0.0046363194,0.0016082474,0.004066822,0.008881838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068891,0.00000592134,0.000029608816,0.000038147555,0.0000011488669,0.000029420402,0.0015709163,0.000057268066,0.000055935,0.8126567,0.17060302,0.014944969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002232081,0.0000030077956,0.00010965361,0.000094228766,6.522767e-7,0.000030106668,0.0002021994,0.000035065015,0.000029456825,0.06762138,0.93186873,0.0000033398205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016721535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023778273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031126741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010335065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041966047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104129314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592186663","doi":"","title":"Review of S.J. McGrath and Joseph Carew (eds.), Rethinking German Idealism (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"German idealism; Idealism; Hegelianism; German; Constructive; Philosophy; Historiography; German philosophy; Epistemology; Art history; Political science; Law; History; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01718077962345372,"score_gpt":0.23437875239042996,"score_spread":0.21719797276697625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592186663","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000512463,0.9882244,0.000060552207,0.007506773,0.0024448126,0.000002034765,0.000039957005,0.000003176093,0.001667032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000904935,0.9887783,0.00008634447,0.004501107,0.0028552474,0.0000067264477,0.0000678587,0.000008658785,0.0027908632],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898595,0.00024856586,0.0001211233,0.00014000604,0.00041752902,0.000086796616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969357,0.0017195408,0.0002770864,0.00008254599,0.0007992902,0.00018565603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019414639,0.0013194858,0.0015428815,0.0057020076,0.0010540376,0.0036527852,0.001515077,0.0026052883,0.011465267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005396389,0.00076125475,0.00055623706,0.008881133,0.0028556148,0.005780734,0.0015393595,0.0040350677,0.007807222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031480962,0.000020565149,0.00016282847,0.0050485125,0.000034541423,0.00009107772,0.00059310073,0.00012729305,0.000099660996,0.011318722,0.8199612,0.16251093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039248634,0.0000054495335,0.0007632384,0.0036449833,0.0000122349475,0.00015627984,0.00026452818,0.000015870113,0.00003813009,0.0019721577,0.99311197,0.000011236288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018697254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041442256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018697254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00450199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055597657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03835517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596494602","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2017.1301776","title":"Hobbes’s agnostic theology before <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Agnosticism; Philosophy; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Existence of God; Epistemology; Faith; Subject (documents); Atheism; Reflexive pronoun; Theism","score_opus":0.048130816466386256,"score_gpt":0.2460425757805446,"score_spread":0.19791175931415833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596494602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04943385,0.008857804,0.0315973,0.061600734,0.002585929,0.00003523957,0.0000892482,0.00009481495,0.8457051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96225685,0.0010637532,0.002867161,0.0047370824,0.0007798246,0.000043182863,0.000023418454,0.0000695917,0.02815908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972621,0.0018324323,0.000064049025,0.00027930306,0.0003760764,0.00018598321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844474,0.0008427615,0.000107390355,0.00017214793,0.00030969494,0.00012335366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028701182,0.0003072213,0.0003760486,0.0012646664,0.004852289,0.0055369604,0.00058224757,0.0022173105,0.002611178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033897543,0.00030149522,0.00034778018,0.0005727327,0.033253867,0.0036660782,0.0021077422,0.0054001855,0.00048522407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004447722,0.0000031898066,0.000022357654,0.000005534852,9.925383e-7,0.000014626712,0.0016910735,0.000023592644,0.00004545979,0.99651355,0.0011584378,0.0005166994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011565684,0.000011211792,0.0002181735,0.00008472314,0.0000052073087,0.000050090162,0.001072094,0.0002794767,0.00021802979,0.8992625,0.098770484,0.000016440816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00682465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00712267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019269566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051678777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598124170","doi":"","title":"Resistance and International Law; De-Coloniality and Pluritopic Hermeneutics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Modernity; Negation; Resistance (ecology); International law; Sociology; Normative; Law and economics; Power (physics); Negotiation; Phenomenon; Hermeneutics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022149055506318675,"score_gpt":0.247783572427401,"score_spread":0.22563451692108233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598124170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05730512,0.011084045,0.029228661,0.019574894,0.0005302802,0.00006493093,0.000017422522,0.00007069216,0.88212395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96905196,0.0025249664,0.0032940705,0.00121559,0.00034492734,0.00008490206,0.000011998788,0.000060111975,0.023411559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98522204,0.011048218,0.00033618498,0.00096661435,0.0016172975,0.00080974045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932579,0.004345765,0.000857678,0.0008214297,0.00046430167,0.0002529471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076888152,0.0005256946,0.00045228674,0.0016587386,0.006843198,0.009514789,0.0011001623,0.002663042,0.0024424642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010623509,0.00029328137,0.00031047905,0.0020504673,0.061899,0.008995957,0.005282624,0.0055305264,0.00035481635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010480745,0.0000029342837,0.00003976802,0.0000070980514,6.178076e-7,0.000020740867,0.0057735685,0.000033479086,0.000022210019,0.99306506,0.00023013826,0.0008033967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009495166,0.000022144735,0.00043090075,0.00016958964,0.0000047695357,0.00025016323,0.013602418,0.0008363635,0.00019999663,0.8478574,0.1366002,0.000016573924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004875008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038077286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009514789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065780706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038168158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047727466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607084653","doi":"10.7202/1039300ar","title":"Le don de Spinoza à la phénoménologie de Jean-Luc Marion","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.06121825978856235,"score_gpt":0.3112653645050885,"score_spread":0.25004710471652614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607084653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06294223,0.08253563,0.011140536,0.23741478,0.003772368,0.00003399928,0.00013386225,0.00015611712,0.60187036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81861514,0.013867838,0.0024863926,0.012237835,0.0015419904,0.00006175707,0.000042227715,0.00019485362,0.15095195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986815,0.00084530475,0.000021206692,0.00015407032,0.00019188866,0.00010600878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991671,0.00047085827,0.00006178337,0.00007135414,0.00014610094,0.0000827863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016219522,0.00038181336,0.0002989535,0.00078056904,0.0059984988,0.006586757,0.00037843978,0.0015323128,0.0046374463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002162005,0.00022079762,0.000255942,0.00087590324,0.017780174,0.003932199,0.0014490321,0.003451089,0.0006258385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026026994,0.0000057608286,0.0002023941,0.000036637044,0.000003077844,0.00008154215,0.017964382,0.00006023612,0.0001634807,0.9617614,0.015525474,0.0041696504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013954433,0.000009501588,0.00093113835,0.00024991616,0.000005717082,0.00021078896,0.0137311155,0.00027944156,0.00024444555,0.16824426,0.81605405,0.000025597392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046833035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037456285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046833035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008874698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034181739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09312087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607399104","doi":"10.1017/s0012217315000530","title":"Spinoza for Our Time: Politics and PostmodernityANTONIO NEGRI New York: Columbia University Press, 2013; 125 pp.; $24.00 (hardback)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0980221160454507,"score_gpt":0.24272917488208282,"score_spread":0.1447070588366321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607399104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006576706,0.3736205,0.00086595677,0.0796848,0.002051967,0.000011829842,0.00025248507,0.00009421501,0.5368415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23600079,0.20156989,0.0011433578,0.006665545,0.0019479783,0.000075700635,0.00023461285,0.0002456844,0.55211645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996697,0.00011382425,0.000009888189,0.00002645924,0.00011436875,0.000065788845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958855,0.00019131743,0.000047345944,0.00003852507,0.000058565613,0.00007578953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008245564,0.00041747215,0.00031742072,0.0009503012,0.0037779482,0.0063993777,0.00038815933,0.0011226245,0.026246356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013071913,0.000304227,0.00011658013,0.0024573244,0.0065614046,0.004952653,0.0017391482,0.0024901358,0.00346517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050640756,0.00002092153,0.00080461055,0.0003241495,0.00000575064,0.00024083625,0.032799743,0.00007916649,0.00026640098,0.33269066,0.4950779,0.13763921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002777779,0.0000027700862,0.0025297515,0.0005320438,0.0000024435203,0.00009064751,0.00947586,0.000029749724,0.000059094913,0.022631846,0.96463615,0.000006983642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059804596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22245243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059804596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066146785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065604877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118912995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618733512","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2017.1322038","title":"Consciousness, ideas of ideas and animation in Spinoza’s<i>Ethics</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Consciousness; Epistemology; Philosophy; Meaning (existential); Illusion; Object (grammar); Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09110031731990202,"score_gpt":0.2892774388847627,"score_spread":0.19817712156486067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618733512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04904777,0.013313836,0.08537873,0.106552005,0.0013124206,0.000058166068,0.000057604866,0.00013034155,0.74414915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576655,0.0017206891,0.008871763,0.0058951485,0.00042167143,0.00010263339,0.000018166145,0.00007030284,0.025234042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740475,0.0017316185,0.000078450255,0.000196479,0.00033082796,0.00025784102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839216,0.0009574938,0.00018312382,0.00013791205,0.0001649458,0.00016423647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025978421,0.00038417673,0.00022561973,0.0009125911,0.0044184644,0.006382421,0.00058803067,0.0027381931,0.0023047775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031282487,0.00020894028,0.00035291622,0.0006887318,0.033389732,0.0055795815,0.002603475,0.0043096226,0.00040788972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022723686,0.0000018027109,0.000040827363,0.00000514792,4.3944456e-7,0.000010100693,0.0014395134,0.000030493913,0.000020379144,0.9969056,0.0007185122,0.0008249226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059345007,0.00000796406,0.00023811433,0.000048282574,0.0000027708625,0.000065670305,0.0016357306,0.00035739227,0.00015373259,0.9118404,0.08563543,0.000008544842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00562797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044486476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006382421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004872617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026619427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03535348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621738759","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199736065.013.0007","title":"Spinoza and Jewish Ethics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Judaism; Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Religious studies; Theology; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09125931568043334,"score_gpt":0.22478111306697088,"score_spread":0.13352179738653752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621738759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07752689,0.022781732,0.0016459065,0.023609057,0.00042238922,0.000011731227,0.00002117374,0.00003208291,0.87394905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520257,0.0021496415,0.00043670222,0.0022149722,0.00016438455,0.000011110871,0.000008727862,0.0000106524885,0.04297815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992236,0.00043420473,0.000017684904,0.000048375765,0.00013551401,0.00014058985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971145,0.0001223011,0.000027123793,0.000025157351,0.000078741476,0.000035155335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010213733,0.0002054229,0.00015905804,0.00059522945,0.0054795602,0.0037631623,0.0002776048,0.0011674094,0.0027638725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000704405,0.000103638944,0.0001198318,0.0005320211,0.01377512,0.0010477753,0.0011893112,0.0014749075,0.00027478588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005849519,0.0000067673677,0.00014693261,0.000012510979,0.0000015201703,0.00004709353,0.005857834,0.000025574487,0.000049223065,0.9872515,0.003065078,0.0035299964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025092859,0.000030803698,0.0021627727,0.00034561288,0.000011442108,0.00019240775,0.012732325,0.0004101883,0.0003391829,0.5438279,0.43990695,0.000015439195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019381227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026777862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019381227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055896547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026677498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040555954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622003887","doi":"","title":"Rethinking German Idealism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"German idealism; Idealism; Philosophy; German; Epistemology; Transcendental idealism; Political radicalism; Reading (process); Politics; Hegelianism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02910992548761574,"score_gpt":0.1991892743673364,"score_spread":0.17007934887972068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622003887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039250027,0.011673673,0.012988542,0.029910978,0.0016586937,0.000022424152,0.00008090611,0.000122041136,0.9042927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87959605,0.0056988196,0.003924193,0.0052986327,0.00050713646,0.000034615525,0.000092460396,0.00014390408,0.104704134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866605,0.00057984487,0.00003619143,0.00013274736,0.00032625324,0.00025900803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995309,0.0002313113,0.000033215612,0.000066001594,0.0000995053,0.00003899881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019972916,0.00045226066,0.00034784238,0.0017199509,0.0028153828,0.004458062,0.00043368895,0.0012270455,0.0026753678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015444718,0.00023732056,0.00047047873,0.0012771958,0.016149485,0.0049277027,0.0026755969,0.0029524066,0.0007689763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006085074,0.0000029119196,0.000048394544,0.0000143497255,0.000001991957,0.000029306706,0.0039753923,0.00011947909,0.000083228515,0.9866136,0.005242491,0.0038628266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001196191,0.000012990724,0.00036487545,0.00013250373,0.000011312453,0.0001333428,0.004026036,0.0005261457,0.0005285121,0.5353447,0.45888862,0.000018943005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081614265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009689515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090638595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090638595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022981274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065763175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265966170","doi":"10.22329/il.v22i2.2582","title":"Pinto's Argument, Inferences and Dialectic","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0688627130124364,"score_gpt":0.25771830160705134,"score_spread":0.18885558859461493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265966170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061552096,0.054553058,0.047324296,0.09003921,0.0031942083,0.00009228989,0.00015606801,0.0001874115,0.79829824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70474446,0.04253078,0.02861895,0.030202495,0.0058785854,0.00060798286,0.00023756285,0.00031254816,0.18686664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625045,0.00204313,0.00009271906,0.0005196685,0.00081743597,0.00027660187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973495,0.0020308027,0.00013808819,0.00019111331,0.00019259166,0.00009791526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028918474,0.00080912915,0.00056469673,0.0026868798,0.004500315,0.010032596,0.0012024856,0.0037300044,0.0055061765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806604,0.00042689484,0.0005118333,0.0029588197,0.019349169,0.010186004,0.0037846107,0.0057487884,0.0010204522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005235908,0.0000025760503,0.000029358782,0.000031017218,0.0000020149773,0.000019881085,0.00088601926,0.0000719449,0.000012058418,0.98720235,0.008633373,0.0031041438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007084297,0.000006298687,0.00014148015,0.00017157117,0.0000054417305,0.00006680717,0.0006403658,0.0002172162,0.00006249578,0.8213178,0.177357,0.0000064553037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004545829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035016546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010032596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050449716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026971432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036603987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727211656","doi":"10.1017/s0034670517000328","title":"Strauss's Double Turn - Joshua Parens : Leo Strauss and the Recovery of Medieval Political Philosophy. Rochester Studies in Medieval Political Thought. (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2016. Pp. xvi, 191.)<sup> 1 </sup>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Theology; Environmental ethics; Religious studies; History; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.11049025044275332,"score_gpt":0.3159779234495834,"score_spread":0.2054876730068301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727211656","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007122261,0.74058,0.0004350314,0.1939277,0.0031698188,0.000006814533,0.00004588447,0.000014875354,0.054697577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5059266,0.32329693,0.0011476517,0.060198713,0.008930726,0.00004319898,0.00008619135,0.00007131238,0.10029858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920577,0.00047367392,0.00002138171,0.0000797051,0.00014061363,0.00007890072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990896,0.00053271296,0.00011309436,0.00005312463,0.00012674317,0.00008469544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017159774,0.00036795594,0.00030058713,0.0011527274,0.002811749,0.003343482,0.000594082,0.0015464835,0.0039638854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028697583,0.0002388765,0.0001915014,0.0013377087,0.011538897,0.005980642,0.0016714615,0.0029782208,0.00067404145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004223083,0.000012536428,0.0005610478,0.00022627322,0.000008041316,0.00011905818,0.017741345,0.00008229839,0.00012086436,0.72634184,0.22675365,0.027990691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010328065,0.0000137096185,0.0018973409,0.0007695109,0.000006817339,0.00018668326,0.00903888,0.00005179925,0.00014396998,0.105346195,0.8825227,0.000012078578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027635807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062197946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027635807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044903005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035549847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05494988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735525097","doi":"10.7756/spst.030.023.393-413","title":"“Degendered”: Spenser’s “yron man” in a “stonie” age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; History","score_opus":0.23421734066803307,"score_gpt":0.3423502269750451,"score_spread":0.10813288630701201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735525097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049392935,0.017416526,0.0053174435,0.09363335,0.0031547726,0.00005472162,0.000078771634,0.000096358875,0.830855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57095057,0.004072119,0.001870464,0.028891472,0.0006562747,0.00004611605,0.000032997756,0.00010117969,0.39337888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892163,0.00053029123,0.00002107532,0.00015513707,0.00019495435,0.00017700084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972254,0.00008975377,0.00002664293,0.000024963829,0.00007324972,0.00006268519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009205521,0.00046908134,0.00022952858,0.00043780365,0.0077548255,0.0031740447,0.00057720614,0.0019279041,0.005693946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001641737,0.00022484729,0.00016886096,0.00024872262,0.0110204285,0.004323288,0.0021913024,0.0039187004,0.0013367197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040741084,0.000018386225,0.00052371115,0.000046072102,0.0000025198558,0.0004655459,0.08495128,0.00005154774,0.00030943548,0.80776757,0.09511784,0.01070534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074424324,0.00003807951,0.0005677373,0.00014020705,0.0000050164504,0.00053209485,0.025695218,0.00008275302,0.00050163217,0.038905878,0.9335059,0.00001796707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027219344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071440294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027219344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035555537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019509363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054121852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749943052","doi":"","title":"Spinoza and the Galilean Heritage: “Galileo and Spinoza”, ed. Filip Buyse, Intellectual History Review, Vol. 23, n. 1 (March 2013)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Galileo (satellite navigation); Galilean; Art history; Philosophy; History; Geography; Theology; Geodesy","score_opus":0.05286527387401024,"score_gpt":0.26113985956961416,"score_spread":0.20827458569560392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749943052","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027899211,0.9081149,0.0002793783,0.06379353,0.002261205,0.0000029820521,0.00004700493,0.000016875025,0.022694146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15185277,0.8049439,0.0007730773,0.014553523,0.0051400336,0.000026749505,0.000119468,0.000054848802,0.022535617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993444,0.00032871804,0.000022219923,0.00007469547,0.00011993629,0.00010997358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994504,0.00032488687,0.00005968781,0.00003884089,0.00006073939,0.0000654865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015882977,0.00078952324,0.00045048195,0.0036297368,0.0037234435,0.008063559,0.00074902194,0.002391218,0.0052165957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016490906,0.00029123758,0.0002482959,0.005501737,0.011711645,0.008759471,0.0030108343,0.0027064546,0.0008225525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008384222,0.000023868704,0.0011747591,0.00096705783,0.000025462996,0.00022854758,0.017559707,0.00023422015,0.0001282811,0.469589,0.3466545,0.16333084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000793272,0.000009105411,0.002570698,0.0020100472,0.000008143641,0.00019017227,0.00954192,0.000049615315,0.0001330453,0.049443007,0.93602204,0.000014302897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01946778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036516115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01946778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005527548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055682138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040105283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750836592","doi":"10.1177/2043820617720063","title":"Spinoza and the possibilities for radical climate ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Humanity; Metaphysics; Politics; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Applied ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10620890049122363,"score_gpt":0.32471113119134404,"score_spread":0.21850223070012043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750836592","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031977966,0.019402828,0.048271522,0.52188975,0.0035335189,0.000042307947,0.000054080498,0.000118073105,0.37471002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400737,0.0033390939,0.008390639,0.027636545,0.001094846,0.00009289955,0.000020454027,0.00009601958,0.01925575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337137,0.0042888657,0.00014293744,0.00073852664,0.0008319878,0.0006263396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967199,0.001996792,0.00023363871,0.00043893367,0.00031179067,0.0002990075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072846967,0.00044291755,0.00049266487,0.0009634358,0.00799717,0.007859647,0.001509052,0.0058584777,0.0033713214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066047846,0.0002635497,0.0006236412,0.00069733296,0.05443196,0.010049442,0.006106799,0.009119715,0.00046983987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020369941,0.00000195733,0.000018793477,0.000010195719,9.760807e-7,0.00001243626,0.001149154,0.000044153192,0.000014981321,0.99719363,0.000869125,0.0006825045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046836167,0.0000029848802,0.00004101677,0.000037917638,0.0000014903501,0.000018669152,0.001680187,0.00011165177,0.00004874705,0.9467021,0.05134598,0.0000047334192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004238068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005702694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00799717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005024286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056018042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03852564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753757413","doi":"10.1017/9781316182253.002","title":"Sovereignty and Grace: Hobbes and the Puritans","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Politics","score_opus":0.04066873224028793,"score_gpt":0.2001620963852847,"score_spread":0.15949336414499676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753757413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006186242,0.02959932,0.0032019087,0.014464265,0.0006746983,0.000009767653,0.000021368054,0.000023440189,0.9458189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65187514,0.02211503,0.0019314317,0.005648049,0.0014711085,0.00008550001,0.000038991515,0.00014795396,0.31668678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998955,0.0006539692,0.000021610384,0.000088323904,0.00016192802,0.00011911038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993187,0.0004123007,0.000035789242,0.00009836801,0.000054797893,0.00008006955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017555025,0.00042974908,0.000403435,0.0006717812,0.005494903,0.0072386516,0.00049954,0.0018875602,0.0070444667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023267902,0.00026677226,0.00023887561,0.0009600149,0.031082667,0.0064620813,0.0031900818,0.004028793,0.0013247498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003379805,0.0000022242339,0.000018046896,0.000011730444,6.292477e-7,0.000016046803,0.004007548,0.000026148973,0.000014267041,0.9882762,0.0047557987,0.0028679823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047886547,0.000006854997,0.00015121565,0.00021391103,0.0000021720195,0.00006334975,0.00405026,0.00008691521,0.00007266111,0.6731807,0.32216114,0.0000062376307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049353642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009565221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072386516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033843943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025533657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024555624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756056001","doi":"10.1515/sats-2017-0013","title":"Schelling on the Possibility of Evil: Rendering Pantheism, Freedom, and Time Consistent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SATS","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"German idealism; Idealism; Dilemma; Philosophy; Epistemology; Individualism; Personality; Psychoanalysis; Hegelianism; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11425953128225794,"score_gpt":0.266793812315916,"score_spread":0.15253428103365804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756056001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10495803,0.004165795,0.026788484,0.08921691,0.0011139642,0.000039034872,0.00007947174,0.00006849462,0.7735698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855209,0.00047408417,0.0019851294,0.0015339986,0.00027500573,0.000023469483,0.000009038607,0.000022401295,0.010155955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797815,0.0013142165,0.000041346557,0.00017734471,0.0002581108,0.0002307087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977476,0.0015417475,0.00013560153,0.00021123038,0.00022115673,0.00014268838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029116704,0.00031939292,0.00035088536,0.0012312745,0.0037282014,0.005194641,0.0006546392,0.0022312847,0.0042494065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003983017,0.00016874154,0.00030759786,0.0006417732,0.036059722,0.0051772124,0.0036201354,0.0033275383,0.00044704645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007456442,0.000002413629,0.000031868916,0.0000033082079,6.945162e-7,0.000026377611,0.0015979831,0.000119085045,0.00002354721,0.9968869,0.00071617245,0.0005842025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010102276,0.000006960178,0.00008074568,0.0000295208,0.0000023587904,0.000022666827,0.0016524378,0.00043149028,0.00009372104,0.9746694,0.022993559,0.000006958565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039534164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004070089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005690659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005690659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019718262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041288853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756142725","doi":"10.1177/0952695117724661","title":"Braidotti, Spinoza and disability studies after the human","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of the Human Sciences","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Posthumanism; Everyday life; Disability studies; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.2265049600964461,"score_gpt":0.343164046691791,"score_spread":0.11665908659534491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756142725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04573932,0.12528037,0.011830924,0.30480117,0.0041434397,0.00006878491,0.00009531633,0.000056105502,0.5079846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87014675,0.032031566,0.0035688481,0.022727448,0.0016349899,0.00016526046,0.00006063119,0.00007020328,0.06959424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985708,0.00080426823,0.000034969984,0.00019668732,0.00022079315,0.00017244852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988796,0.0006960722,0.00007531385,0.00009622477,0.00010528157,0.00014751474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021123025,0.00047780605,0.00037583627,0.0013703586,0.0060513183,0.006308811,0.0007301439,0.0032900292,0.0029891504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023499518,0.00013221458,0.00025766078,0.001397003,0.037521083,0.0067906943,0.0024572988,0.0067906845,0.0003891421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045987376,0.000007841286,0.00008236203,0.000022115431,9.625157e-7,0.00002731722,0.007383603,0.000017299271,0.000036865044,0.984789,0.004607894,0.0030200535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014023771,0.000022467273,0.00066918094,0.0002733744,0.0000043678874,0.00013007232,0.009189907,0.00009168067,0.00013928358,0.5562094,0.433242,0.000014207819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132376505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014812083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132376505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007040919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040830756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05108565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759226668","doi":"10.1086/695244","title":": <i>The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03852248572778839,"score_gpt":0.26198041555885676,"score_spread":0.22345792983106838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759226668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012533624,0.3406328,0.015151543,0.018820917,0.011250086,0.00003245002,0.0014029336,0.00040522302,0.6110507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059540514,0.28510797,0.01843882,0.008976008,0.009730498,0.00021627588,0.0021202348,0.0014631775,0.61440647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995365,0.00018143507,0.000052192387,0.000057252353,0.00014111512,0.000031550706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923885,0.00043013273,0.000045675588,0.00009149072,0.00011470802,0.00007921864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006876581,0.0008243619,0.0004973855,0.0024105338,0.0012880764,0.0035980358,0.0005792674,0.0009848775,0.057338264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021967816,0.0004265147,0.00026133851,0.003926606,0.002659856,0.0045670155,0.0010655075,0.0022718473,0.025491646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027621636,0.000016325872,0.00013428635,0.0006143761,0.0000071618397,0.000046617228,0.0023996653,0.00009552636,0.00026655293,0.18217497,0.6829932,0.13122377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012495474,0.0000034222467,0.0003054103,0.00027497794,0.0000013933382,0.00006123773,0.0003798948,0.0000175917,0.00006694855,0.016599867,0.98228365,0.0000045051693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003413585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113954535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057338264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001277901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012911083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19181561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766811220","doi":"10.1177/1474885117731941","title":"The two faces of personhood: Hobbes, corporate agency and the personality of the state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Personhood; State (computer science); Agency (philosophy); Politics; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Sociology; Personality; Social contract; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0684273226156935,"score_gpt":0.26585277960035913,"score_spread":0.19742545698466563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766811220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2520949,0.024236549,0.019450596,0.10900855,0.0013898995,0.000022549026,0.000037748723,0.000035035035,0.5937242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98494244,0.0021735756,0.0012065244,0.0020696896,0.0002709479,0.000014720991,0.0000073612287,0.000011625589,0.009303061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986324,0.0010014188,0.000022340584,0.00008922056,0.00013287258,0.00012174714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990415,0.0005319459,0.00009497329,0.00006967784,0.000060479048,0.0002014671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020953284,0.0002128772,0.00020207527,0.0007058158,0.0037578177,0.005609685,0.00028390312,0.0014852158,0.002158454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017947732,0.00015293536,0.00015492519,0.0006939751,0.029966027,0.0059983963,0.0022697935,0.0022438434,0.00028494388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011771108,0.0000076552615,0.0003218392,0.000010426725,0.0000014299379,0.000046062418,0.022909109,0.000028143513,0.00006657946,0.9714687,0.0016054849,0.0035227453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012771138,0.00003492855,0.0026368839,0.00014842134,0.0000057375923,0.0002757094,0.039738674,0.00032813323,0.00015118843,0.83010286,0.126544,0.000020714642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020922737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025933378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005609685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016245177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007775816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0117868185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767068266","doi":"10.5325/jspecphil.31.4.0594","title":"On Rupture: An Intervention into Epistemological Disruptions of Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Hume","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Situationism; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07502693068023626,"score_gpt":0.3170794866370634,"score_spread":0.24205255595682718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767068266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25992283,0.009208661,0.099163905,0.13690177,0.001834636,0.000110444824,0.00005254979,0.00026141692,0.4925438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927347,0.00049308635,0.0018129022,0.001224921,0.00011988604,0.0000317927,0.000005222746,0.000051840823,0.0035257358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023193,0.007372335,0.00018168426,0.0006026321,0.000976692,0.00063471455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880156,0.008509707,0.00084848487,0.0014245723,0.00072606467,0.0004755438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013627699,0.00046330062,0.00084576383,0.0014408331,0.010407714,0.012247318,0.0016829466,0.004514335,0.0028553526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019816719,0.00048609386,0.0004104524,0.0011658391,0.10106344,0.015173122,0.012134668,0.01071724,0.00035713435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017314997,0.000008934204,0.000120957215,0.000012976326,0.0000021892895,0.00005992644,0.0562543,0.00008093345,0.00007045421,0.9411638,0.00064995897,0.0015581285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020288539,0.000027340762,0.00024212884,0.00015563723,0.000007779249,0.000084638996,0.04917013,0.0006612558,0.00039112347,0.8954047,0.053816732,0.000018209332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026044832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002265211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013627699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074290936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038282843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072071016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767834551","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341377","title":"Is Collingwood a Historicist? Remarks on Leo Strauss’s Critique of Collingwood’s Philosophy of History","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); German; Autonomy; Law","score_opus":0.09477770772894578,"score_gpt":0.2726190734748265,"score_spread":0.17784136574588072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767834551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030344471,0.016710956,0.013127877,0.7097541,0.0030295427,0.000030321875,0.00007297658,0.00007215885,0.22685756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8799771,0.0063744374,0.004826231,0.07280986,0.005028477,0.000107790394,0.000035617744,0.00022691625,0.030613586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994021,0.003468787,0.000141295,0.00069571385,0.0011633473,0.00050984125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828708,0.013927513,0.0005905438,0.00049163686,0.0016360491,0.00048343602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008577279,0.0004670633,0.00061058364,0.002409793,0.009336716,0.009463629,0.0020480014,0.0067446954,0.003559538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018990763,0.00039306397,0.000409919,0.00229879,0.040711135,0.009163763,0.0041501555,0.009207386,0.00044704732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075325397,0.0000035954918,0.00007565336,0.000018429935,0.000002423349,0.000060994058,0.008060712,0.00010477797,0.000016943739,0.97359836,0.015996784,0.0020537856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001252857,0.00001191335,0.00020564144,0.00035503265,0.000008343599,0.00010523652,0.01104469,0.000746686,0.00019503804,0.71186095,0.27542666,0.000027227054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04204178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031870734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04204178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011291939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060312147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08359414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780626661","doi":"10.1163/18760759-03800007","title":"Grotius and Kant on Original Community of Goods and Property","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Grotiana","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Institution; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; International law; Property law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.10951164067472827,"score_gpt":0.2846923100046922,"score_spread":0.17518066932996393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780626661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060875516,0.021697773,0.024793752,0.030888002,0.00045751405,0.000042080996,0.00012636746,0.00007573156,0.86104333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95232594,0.004197627,0.004731723,0.0031071818,0.00051558844,0.00006798855,0.00005069822,0.000061944316,0.034941263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824595,0.0009213903,0.000033896034,0.00022670976,0.0003274255,0.00024462727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992022,0.00045595426,0.000066208566,0.00011703354,0.00008572521,0.00007286736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015224164,0.00036079533,0.00039217147,0.0018187474,0.0038146065,0.0038970304,0.00061332923,0.0024334292,0.0038440607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002159853,0.00018969554,0.00037513554,0.0018677864,0.0342244,0.00647046,0.0035947417,0.002503144,0.0004983926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025397626,9.364906e-7,0.000014006832,0.0000038003507,5.2586097e-7,0.000009123892,0.0005090007,0.000034742672,0.000009887412,0.9983783,0.0005327241,0.00050445984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000548887,0.00000415787,0.00010869731,0.000024034078,0.0000013882272,0.000026768572,0.00034945263,0.000069338894,0.00003547555,0.9628627,0.03650852,0.0000040575733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004795044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005580865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004919863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004919863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018703735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03569621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784756892","doi":"10.1163/24055069-00301002","title":"Scholasticism, Enlightenment, and the Problem of Print: The Mediality of the Debate about Benito Jerónimo Feijoo’s Teatro crítico universal","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erudition and the Republic of Letters","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholasticism; Enlightenment; Dialectic; Legitimacy; Philosophy; Literature; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Humanities; Aesthetics; Theology; Sociology; Art; Law; Political science; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014444583671310147,"score_gpt":0.20743253002911805,"score_spread":0.1929879463578079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784756892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13391614,0.020232422,0.003602632,0.25999326,0.0015168616,0.000013310875,0.000034815755,0.000055634464,0.580635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97638637,0.0011831954,0.0002650271,0.005220617,0.0005712135,0.000006945587,0.00000652062,0.000057989153,0.016302032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645966,0.002023533,0.000067968576,0.0003543945,0.0007044663,0.00038999759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927839,0.005192947,0.00045129954,0.00043869097,0.0007042218,0.0004290114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006649942,0.00023819036,0.00035708412,0.0011659241,0.008520543,0.0156315,0.0009438188,0.0049023456,0.003140278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009995888,0.00017938389,0.00017225066,0.0009997354,0.052193917,0.0059442157,0.0036574148,0.0076571484,0.00030333034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033315075,0.00001764706,0.0003164285,0.000029211744,0.000003345636,0.00009703478,0.046895824,0.00006736997,0.000082985185,0.941971,0.0047996505,0.005686172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081232334,0.000041352814,0.0021950223,0.0006160741,0.000014244127,0.00023695968,0.082965665,0.000467249,0.000741877,0.5041388,0.4084507,0.000050783405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014851764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015918316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0156315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013573068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033774776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09847993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790871363","doi":"","title":"Against the Commodification of Water","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Business; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.05474881580164303,"score_gpt":0.2578255763904626,"score_spread":0.20307676058881957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790871363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037259758,0.0078163175,0.01647652,0.122788355,0.0010767796,0.000040269442,0.000088877496,0.000055584653,0.8143975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8531164,0.0034569732,0.004094501,0.022477949,0.0009847643,0.00011923202,0.000036359448,0.00014815871,0.115565665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966485,0.0015184707,0.00009811827,0.0005507578,0.00076367304,0.00042048626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725914,0.0014029653,0.0002473518,0.0005198805,0.00041714532,0.00015339495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004401828,0.00044502897,0.00044493712,0.0011308925,0.0045895525,0.008014792,0.0012267798,0.007238035,0.009524555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007947286,0.00034853016,0.00042870347,0.0010344357,0.060247976,0.013936138,0.005938153,0.010416243,0.00081104395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042857773,0.0000020534674,0.000016667012,0.0000074570844,7.7726384e-7,0.000007324675,0.000991661,0.000033597822,0.00003245369,0.99726474,0.0007978934,0.00084103324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019760155,0.000012708438,0.00015420407,0.00014106784,0.0000047799517,0.000038164,0.0024826603,0.0002303259,0.00025489915,0.8447102,0.15193883,0.000012451954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011940761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015561717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011940761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006756094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052502877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049019158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801415455","doi":"10.22215/etd/2013-09988","title":"Human Nature in Hobbes and Thucydides","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Plague (disease); Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Economic Justice; Spanish Civil War; State of nature; History; Law; Political science; Ancient history","score_opus":0.02372924464872864,"score_gpt":0.274496406348128,"score_spread":0.25076716169939933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801415455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031988572,0.09569139,0.004346235,0.046627752,0.006722436,0.000034224035,0.00005238137,0.00004282082,0.81449425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81234956,0.020692272,0.0028568627,0.011521313,0.0057261055,0.00014717493,0.000049511,0.00015520329,0.14650202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987214,0.00083360064,0.00003156011,0.00013513392,0.00013887283,0.00013949457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992823,0.00043947579,0.000047661102,0.000058512836,0.00007600355,0.00009611102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014793834,0.0005446655,0.00038223088,0.0015929979,0.0070113675,0.0054408256,0.0003950028,0.001719062,0.002933752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020551358,0.00021894861,0.00018825835,0.0009923138,0.01962044,0.00317233,0.0021479588,0.002872804,0.0006403182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025527565,0.000010450467,0.0001259294,0.000035594785,0.0000020011485,0.000068320325,0.019722639,0.000044841767,0.00007346587,0.9631689,0.011413232,0.005309091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010383529,0.000026134307,0.00066584063,0.00024434947,0.000004000685,0.00013254855,0.0083078025,0.00013171247,0.00016967548,0.26844245,0.721853,0.000012008712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005658186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00898362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070113675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004113811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012643617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02984792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807965826","doi":"10.3989/hs.2018.014","title":"La leyenda dorada del protestantismo. Hermenéutica bíblica, libertad de conciencia y libertad política","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Hispania Sacra","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022581307358406716,"score_gpt":0.27114276841924645,"score_spread":0.24856146106083973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807965826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04192123,0.010609669,0.0043160296,0.029655233,0.0008600198,0.000032596865,0.000056787947,0.00006778373,0.91248065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8496759,0.0032757325,0.00096159335,0.0028990842,0.00041341328,0.000032305892,0.00003149451,0.000053770415,0.1426567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997895,0.0009918535,0.000047580455,0.00030443436,0.00041305576,0.00034812084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991787,0.00031073496,0.00011630113,0.00012337195,0.00015616826,0.000114808914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017147183,0.00030564106,0.00022139127,0.0009538716,0.005939997,0.0065672137,0.00039025713,0.001660027,0.006457399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023893747,0.0001701282,0.0002301786,0.0009594794,0.022456553,0.0022461955,0.0023293565,0.0029370205,0.0006774844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007087122,0.000004445721,0.00020717314,0.000019577166,0.0000018298298,0.000019455036,0.0044530095,0.000035336598,0.000059898586,0.9889643,0.0028681364,0.0033596635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023909995,0.00003291631,0.0035555349,0.00028982395,0.000009685649,0.000106493346,0.009445848,0.00025810758,0.000496484,0.26397097,0.7217951,0.000015148398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016599365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029029902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016599365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009072978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065077213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06582934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808231890","doi":"","title":"Review of Riccardo Saccenti’s Debating Medieval Natural Law: A Survey (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2016)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analecta hermeneutica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Middle Ages; Ideology; Reading (process); Philosophy; Period (music); Law; Transition (genetics); Canon law; Classics; Epistemology; History; Humanities; Political science; Politics; Theology; Aesthetics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04838886735422862,"score_gpt":0.26499434098453806,"score_spread":0.21660547363030944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808231890","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023582655,0.97711015,0.0001268489,0.012466691,0.002270808,0.000002761481,0.000035238372,0.000007215865,0.0077444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046871644,0.9749486,0.00020666287,0.009237508,0.005929065,0.000009814219,0.00009274321,0.00001972016,0.00486866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991811,0.00021948703,0.000059828428,0.000101007994,0.00036878898,0.00006987018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968935,0.0020489558,0.00020641163,0.000085566135,0.0005835192,0.0001819571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001925894,0.0005611051,0.000696226,0.0058200373,0.0012299926,0.002698398,0.0007832611,0.0015547281,0.0048374697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004716661,0.00040742237,0.00024241999,0.009897796,0.0035395676,0.0040255855,0.0016860379,0.0026840894,0.0017611218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026173715,0.000026413061,0.00054550637,0.0035757376,0.000024743065,0.00009391243,0.0015181587,0.00021552108,0.00014804893,0.065438695,0.7222614,0.20612566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011045893,0.0000041784992,0.00078535837,0.0015796254,0.0000032112243,0.00006515548,0.0002445775,0.000014082894,0.000027176859,0.0020376428,0.9952324,0.0000055875266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015243703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028418437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015243703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00483092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030309975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883081342","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190879808.003.0006","title":"“This Quarter of the Globe”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Globe; Metaphor; Commonwealth; State (computer science); History; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.036063602806906375,"score_gpt":0.20112079430725563,"score_spread":0.16505719150034925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883081342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029445144,0.014157088,0.0011588834,0.011303442,0.0028440272,0.00001247086,0.00009090269,0.00007608442,0.9674126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12584615,0.011403135,0.0012263622,0.010094835,0.0018612877,0.000046030378,0.00021501386,0.0001964816,0.8491108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995086,0.0001624285,0.0000118527305,0.00008955008,0.00010748828,0.00012018386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999824,0.00003410142,0.000015298425,0.000039461876,0.000040785064,0.000046506237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048725808,0.000640977,0.00027114557,0.0011618802,0.003999754,0.0059044096,0.00050341117,0.0015106264,0.022093954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008188377,0.00017773717,0.00029702845,0.0016645312,0.0078012845,0.005705688,0.0028917925,0.0031645556,0.0053585493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014455947,0.0000066413418,0.00012301096,0.000035538964,0.0000029358173,0.000052890016,0.0067122946,0.000038531332,0.00012156568,0.84181374,0.1313671,0.01971129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002028992,0.0000041829444,0.00017438173,0.00006937326,0.0000014554723,0.000050211398,0.0015815472,0.000016827586,0.000049778857,0.025346152,0.9727017,0.000002404497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009031108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017881125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022093954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033715824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002494113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07391161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883285394","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-67407-0_5","title":"Spinoza Through the Prism of Later ‘East-West’ Exchanges: Analogues of Buddhist Themes in the Ethics and the Works of Early Spinozists","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Sophia studies in cross-cultural philosophy of traditions and cultures","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Philosophy; CONTEST; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Naturalism; Ontology; Religious studies; Theology","score_opus":0.20548908987168518,"score_gpt":0.36829220161660164,"score_spread":0.16280311174491646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883285394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05202017,0.005096804,0.006410807,0.009893476,0.00037051615,0.00002728363,0.000038593902,0.00005662197,0.92608565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9179973,0.001278749,0.0016666909,0.0009407814,0.00008235726,0.000031779637,0.000020207668,0.00010072154,0.07788135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989384,0.0005906435,0.000030746916,0.000112894384,0.00014777787,0.0001795753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.00034003748,0.00004690922,0.00014128014,0.00008092118,0.00007119522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016195641,0.00039621396,0.0003145015,0.0006622959,0.0077566374,0.010921301,0.00062897283,0.0015208587,0.0041942718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017931338,0.00026503895,0.00022793484,0.0008654931,0.03135687,0.0063330973,0.003575276,0.0056666373,0.00054726744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001057719,0.0000048236834,0.00006253538,0.000013279451,0.0000012781146,0.00002974392,0.026487397,0.000019927917,0.00005929982,0.970074,0.00092220574,0.0023149122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030481326,0.000028215954,0.0011987168,0.00026610395,0.000017891487,0.00025919813,0.052824635,0.00030125017,0.00062975415,0.55522835,0.3891959,0.000019498748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139697855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02683887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0139697855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006412349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004210741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899947921","doi":"10.7202/1053560ar","title":"Le suicide de Sénèque chez Spinoza","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05399055024066228,"score_gpt":0.29985003287385675,"score_spread":0.24585948263319446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899947921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78525794,0.005686672,0.002289705,0.033306565,0.0007086913,0.00003559202,0.00009231268,0.000026939155,0.17259562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98146975,0.001402777,0.00020359128,0.0014234001,0.000038709903,0.000007239439,0.000019117999,0.0000059876993,0.015429557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935585,0.00027577835,0.000022593786,0.00004510071,0.000082983446,0.00021764866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961287,0.000121960155,0.000085807726,0.000042987558,0.00006281439,0.00007359458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007866713,0.0002531525,0.00030457787,0.00055567536,0.008293802,0.002501079,0.00037763754,0.0015593709,0.0043175956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016297075,0.00011435038,0.00033949997,0.0004819255,0.008534161,0.0013751358,0.0025110824,0.002594067,0.00047762797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016694012,0.00008986843,0.023562321,0.00022419658,0.0000538266,0.00844512,0.31161797,0.0003867885,0.00093387766,0.60315955,0.009746674,0.04161287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006030734,0.00018255321,0.033753984,0.0009165907,0.00008959386,0.010111183,0.5342054,0.00073371,0.0014500122,0.07009053,0.3482796,0.00012659606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05860431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11082446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05860431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037626724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026243937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116526365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906995437","doi":"","title":"Review: Andrea Sangiacomo and Francesco Toto (eds.), \"Essentia actuosa. Riletture dell’'Etica' di Spinoza\"","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.03823395810823993,"score_gpt":0.2763907180194755,"score_spread":0.23815675991123558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906995437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024682548,0.9907685,0.000034081935,0.005790838,0.00292298,0.00000509224,0.00004555932,0.000006027413,0.00040216988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00034442623,0.99351937,0.00006111864,0.0029169966,0.002363049,0.000016052243,0.00006485868,0.0000039689103,0.00071009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899167,0.00027172448,0.00011303497,0.00018935662,0.0003465804,0.00008771947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994679,0.003294657,0.00049732515,0.00009833923,0.001128383,0.00030237253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025041883,0.0020820799,0.0032945103,0.0052296105,0.00097295764,0.005060111,0.0024036155,0.003561583,0.01445461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009739806,0.00085546245,0.0012258248,0.008873892,0.001494616,0.0062099556,0.0020442128,0.004599781,0.006758647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089367175,0.000015189049,0.00016588507,0.027888408,0.00019746152,0.000073150564,0.00024511243,0.0001528056,0.00008044216,0.0028772547,0.7560072,0.21220776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037452366,0.00001472295,0.0008032362,0.01554602,0.00026088642,0.00019439607,0.00021886655,0.000037457514,0.00004802581,0.0014662468,0.98134446,0.000028237118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008705288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016543841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01445461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025600693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059561348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04835546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907604273","doi":"10.1017/s0012217318000343","title":"Condillac et la critique d’un système. Le cas leibnizien","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030899112131698617,"score_gpt":0.2948423205637719,"score_spread":0.2639432084320733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907604273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033458196,0.026131272,0.08386311,0.06561193,0.0015632606,0.000060383893,0.00018897223,0.00021369907,0.7889092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041994,0.0060707238,0.013335803,0.004195212,0.00094134035,0.00013802048,0.000082610786,0.00019967374,0.07083719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942602,0.0028433942,0.00017124393,0.0009852829,0.0013334374,0.00040645245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979626,0.0011041439,0.00018052816,0.00030570602,0.000319528,0.00012753134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051740524,0.000727851,0.00065459835,0.0031535309,0.00650696,0.009778486,0.0012053766,0.0036467614,0.0055764234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066798157,0.0003905037,0.0006889221,0.0028182021,0.046295352,0.0109365275,0.004070435,0.0046064663,0.0009840521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020492039,6.555792e-7,0.000024619461,0.000008037869,8.275538e-7,0.000007424758,0.00075572444,0.00003240361,0.000021941883,0.99788374,0.0004824136,0.00078011793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090891945,0.00000889148,0.00016833567,0.00006568699,0.0000049222226,0.000057928668,0.0010908954,0.00038933015,0.00018421547,0.91559726,0.08241236,0.000011095616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01457788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011745464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01457788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012308829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007030399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08930725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911564157","doi":"10.7202/1055271ar","title":"Spinoza et Darwin, un héritage véritablement conceptuel ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.18704083362799145,"score_gpt":0.3422561157813269,"score_spread":0.15521528215333547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911564157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11365672,0.012811246,0.043515377,0.028008232,0.0013999717,0.00007107076,0.00013223517,0.000068976835,0.80033624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96160185,0.0022677907,0.00727562,0.0011913504,0.0001627387,0.000046161476,0.000049638846,0.000044583812,0.027360266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795914,0.0008120242,0.00006765381,0.0003407882,0.00059982756,0.00022058134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988977,0.00051861943,0.00014246143,0.00015557931,0.00017462083,0.000111101865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002667827,0.00043895893,0.00044982522,0.0015212955,0.0042931708,0.007237918,0.0007562793,0.0016221737,0.004771788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002955183,0.0001625672,0.00032496892,0.001733717,0.027443971,0.008549794,0.0032001324,0.0033267,0.00044631006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000856224,0.0000022609572,0.00016312499,0.000019459421,0.0000020484101,0.000023533512,0.003915265,0.00004182235,0.000058821297,0.9919694,0.00028808726,0.003507739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017240749,0.000035960984,0.001748545,0.00019355246,0.0000138804535,0.0002515115,0.0147270765,0.0003560708,0.00037416746,0.78354347,0.19871594,0.000022523562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011167359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013160358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011167359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058969217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041617793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042785406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912720178","doi":"10.5840/envirophil201912381","title":"The Human/Animal Logic of Sovereignty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Applied philosophy; General interest; Human animal; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Biology; Law; Ecology; Livestock; Politics","score_opus":0.02723762117224883,"score_gpt":0.21858929382115597,"score_spread":0.19135167264890712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912720178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04009479,0.00447288,0.030073745,0.040657375,0.0006198167,0.000028238312,0.00010610034,0.00003703271,0.88391006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524992,0.0011750094,0.0034058017,0.003809362,0.00048653787,0.000057130623,0.000028296736,0.000033030756,0.038505595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840015,0.0008999711,0.00004934253,0.0002474063,0.000232727,0.00017042283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981719,0.0011781774,0.00012196288,0.0002085573,0.00021309464,0.00010626252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037819794,0.00032802558,0.00037745739,0.0012073427,0.0036139693,0.005979624,0.0008697138,0.0034750653,0.006394104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003040041,0.00031496154,0.0003631922,0.0011134297,0.05415111,0.00701088,0.0022694287,0.0058138403,0.00045309545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.522565e-7,0.0000010291732,0.0000103342545,0.0000019283127,5.356769e-7,0.000003269271,0.00027049502,0.000020146612,0.000006036293,0.9993154,0.00017810012,0.00019193247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005885387,0.0000033652009,0.00007602798,0.00001873164,0.0000017540457,0.000012727684,0.0003093211,0.00010548407,0.00003657763,0.981878,0.017549446,0.0000026350765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052535357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005345294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006394104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047636786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029718704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034563065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917400860","doi":"","title":"Leo Strauss on Nazism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Politics; Political theology; Nazism; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Communism; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.09377313309748674,"score_gpt":0.32734853935485286,"score_spread":0.2335754062573661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917400860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03397197,0.079771146,0.0024156945,0.1927763,0.0016668331,0.000021516038,0.00006786221,0.000046353893,0.68926233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83918095,0.016079748,0.0007953771,0.028141655,0.0022016836,0.000037463615,0.000031947413,0.000061023355,0.11347021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986118,0.00072303595,0.000026294347,0.00015678634,0.00027599515,0.000206147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926573,0.00039617284,0.000066416986,0.0000517367,0.00015280476,0.00006704543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048289,0.0002784501,0.000275335,0.0011579528,0.0038251395,0.002989365,0.0004255924,0.0023884191,0.0031533153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003042606,0.00014496477,0.00015645933,0.0005847783,0.01385401,0.003246249,0.002124764,0.0038585623,0.001069992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005883976,0.000003748753,0.00013724792,0.00001574105,0.0000010520192,0.000029188011,0.0031132468,0.000051766427,0.000048737118,0.97909766,0.013955272,0.003540462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011248374,0.000018441533,0.000625423,0.00027229817,0.0000028219367,0.00008369862,0.0018256747,0.0001965488,0.00019315867,0.45809805,0.53866094,0.000011724501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017562192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020302694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017562192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054374337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024219158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03945154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940591297","doi":"10.1080/1354571x.2019.1573018","title":"Challenging intellectual hierarchies. Hegel in Risorgimento political thought: an introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Italian Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hegelianism; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07065970620145903,"score_gpt":0.30358277891720264,"score_spread":0.2329230727157436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940591297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026587661,0.20447637,0.0080584,0.20506048,0.028875899,0.00010576556,0.00022155157,0.0001884525,0.5264255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4965661,0.16881402,0.008644307,0.04606113,0.09655567,0.00043945652,0.0003370423,0.0003998663,0.18218239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990146,0.0005113922,0.00002948376,0.00009392428,0.00017541545,0.00017505063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861515,0.0010844293,0.00006125831,0.000036207468,0.00010238868,0.00010057084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001494962,0.00060391624,0.00048456932,0.0024774887,0.0031634609,0.0063671353,0.00065328425,0.0032185563,0.005126379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020511085,0.00019955818,0.00042247266,0.0021365727,0.008584248,0.0044416613,0.00304326,0.004545037,0.00084944925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023439576,0.000038802616,0.00054211967,0.00022998615,0.0000051320394,0.00022816288,0.023082267,0.00020097032,0.00015279978,0.87555295,0.079863474,0.02007992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008105577,0.000024975414,0.0010292234,0.0006257708,0.0000047640324,0.00020675127,0.006418932,0.0002721447,0.000075462885,0.09580625,0.895512,0.000015719472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004307657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006454961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063671353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004666943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018695927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03386116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948296990","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2019.1620531","title":"Leo Strauss and the Challenge of Revealed Religion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Levi strauss; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Humanities","score_opus":0.027081135554243577,"score_gpt":0.2195411310023926,"score_spread":0.192459995448149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948296990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0587529,0.021636568,0.0033429551,0.14353964,0.001005094,0.000025282012,0.00003224227,0.000021392065,0.771644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91054004,0.0029773465,0.00067569915,0.016572243,0.0007719715,0.000035913068,0.000011215206,0.00004307752,0.068372525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962521,0.0022925301,0.00007099767,0.0003723428,0.00039782678,0.0006141715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962655,0.0026694238,0.00018591467,0.00034490853,0.00029277676,0.00024159187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006400745,0.0002910885,0.00050735235,0.0014482574,0.011278254,0.0088210385,0.0010295694,0.0076653636,0.005012843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007878264,0.00027037165,0.00026013757,0.0011869486,0.06695721,0.008398491,0.0050741383,0.009626694,0.00047245593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041884064,0.000002856196,0.00003353428,0.0000045178163,8.6110055e-7,0.000016228589,0.0035140328,0.00002698145,0.000009496912,0.9940971,0.0012924019,0.0009978482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019504876,0.000011635814,0.00028887144,0.00012188352,0.000003050712,0.00005275767,0.0059599373,0.00015805152,0.000085303545,0.87510395,0.118180715,0.000014230931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019170277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03055805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019170277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008042198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004871288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058350503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979044787","doi":"","title":"Philosophical tensions in the liberal tradition, constraints on the good life","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Social science; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.01744058939036197,"score_gpt":0.17311624138964066,"score_spread":0.15567565199927869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979044787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025658285,0.02883464,0.01625357,0.38690788,0.0020064435,0.000026067304,0.00006490507,0.000058099464,0.5401901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682735,0.015812177,0.0070939,0.0453988,0.0033056005,0.000111315545,0.00003917005,0.000107862325,0.059857752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991028,0.0044283844,0.00021556426,0.00076578103,0.0028582432,0.0007039839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194723,0.005308455,0.00046194158,0.00066898984,0.0009241837,0.0006890482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010362419,0.0003591921,0.00060054444,0.0016380098,0.011812687,0.015096821,0.0010601075,0.004796838,0.0033777487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01041589,0.0003216631,0.00026790702,0.002830766,0.10997831,0.008066461,0.0045967754,0.011176904,0.00064146717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002533384,0.000003921029,0.000039984425,0.000011414191,9.23896e-7,0.000009608634,0.003573011,0.000036730667,0.000021180838,0.992207,0.0022982375,0.0017955145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068078616,0.000004107081,0.00016323247,0.00012959396,0.0000018983951,0.000024317496,0.0036277238,0.00007788466,0.00004485123,0.8756751,0.12023726,0.0000072606213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022238623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025954543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022238623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021326749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020069346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15473711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995240045","doi":"10.4000/books.psorbonne.39091","title":"Les accommodements raisonnables de Spinoza","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05893311694645475,"score_gpt":0.29073708026864703,"score_spread":0.23180396332219227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995240045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019240757,0.006482606,0.002263908,0.0044205487,0.0005699788,0.000019765372,0.000057406607,0.000060113613,0.96688485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46999016,0.0039406084,0.0012585532,0.0014486854,0.00012540107,0.000039659266,0.00007960714,0.00014882248,0.5229685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990957,0.00022128095,0.000027530232,0.00014359067,0.00024072106,0.00027120777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997812,0.000048909613,0.000020006148,0.000037628834,0.000067731715,0.00004457953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053437724,0.0005399905,0.00031862775,0.0006598633,0.008898337,0.009015077,0.00042062672,0.0012086631,0.0119975675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008711473,0.00029253325,0.00028255727,0.0011035432,0.010064922,0.004143626,0.002746098,0.003081866,0.002541828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047160684,0.000010675552,0.00039120874,0.000054976805,0.0000044297763,0.00011006834,0.020589327,0.000050261497,0.0003670572,0.946738,0.013430614,0.018206209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009536711,0.000013815014,0.00096335885,0.00014608099,0.000008966681,0.00018220532,0.015027195,0.00006701776,0.00034299403,0.040016554,0.9432032,0.000019091613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07941299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15826446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07941299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006737892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005866165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15790153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995495432","doi":"10.7202/1064974ar","title":"OF THE HUMANITIES AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL DISCIPLINE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surfaces","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eurocentrism; Modernity; Reading (process); Philosophy of history; Dimension (graph theory); Epistemology; Philosophy; History of philosophy; World history; Universal history; Sociology; Humanities; Social science; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Classics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.041468117577062126,"score_gpt":0.2369478598351789,"score_spread":0.1954797422581168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995495432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0099380035,0.069267884,0.0066480963,0.13706265,0.0031334232,0.00001690396,0.00003594809,0.00005430915,0.77384275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82692283,0.03390978,0.0037679186,0.025580546,0.0061554615,0.00009530484,0.00005102838,0.0001000774,0.10341701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371415,0.004273815,0.00012686968,0.0006022913,0.0007798527,0.00050301995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322766,0.0042818887,0.00048213347,0.001003438,0.0004581294,0.00054674706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061600613,0.0004322252,0.0005396308,0.0015571282,0.007153862,0.013626507,0.00072940846,0.00398649,0.007613244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006323694,0.00020341651,0.00029470527,0.0015528086,0.06451352,0.010331019,0.0051983856,0.007059509,0.0009810503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020847,0.0000034075424,0.00006906522,0.000015120467,0.0000012138756,0.000008828923,0.0020719643,0.00002024394,0.000012389267,0.9928847,0.0025631944,0.002347765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000548242,0.00000724757,0.00019879299,0.00020923524,0.000002110803,0.000044736764,0.003385145,0.00006785933,0.00003442543,0.69288874,0.3031515,0.0000046833825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045433696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050024386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013626507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057008453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008104318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041362703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995510321","doi":"10.1163/18760759-04000006","title":"Hugo Grotius and Samuel Pufendorf on Last Wills and Testaments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Grotiana","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Natural law; Law; Legal history; Philosophy; History; Political science","score_opus":0.024078745137779505,"score_gpt":0.212762575687329,"score_spread":0.1886838305495495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995510321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057284597,0.033325516,0.0051696985,0.14282708,0.0018034843,0.000035483037,0.000077470664,0.000056080004,0.75942063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90981144,0.0063971537,0.001724255,0.010575527,0.0014519428,0.000044053493,0.000028904133,0.000047679816,0.0699191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903774,0.0004018507,0.000014269278,0.00015231673,0.00018838944,0.00020538662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992772,0.0004655384,0.00005730271,0.000046443976,0.00006893127,0.0000846314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013722111,0.00030097167,0.00025376267,0.0011140445,0.0046071573,0.0038494368,0.00058115483,0.0029148336,0.0049303365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020634248,0.00018462994,0.00023569516,0.0007443162,0.023330802,0.0039813034,0.0019029505,0.002718003,0.0005771919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072573002,0.000005286555,0.00012539496,0.0000064113037,0.0000012089815,0.000035787423,0.0016143331,0.00005515109,0.000026982714,0.9877873,0.007921572,0.0024132729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014405118,0.000016353833,0.0011533616,0.00012749607,0.0000040778864,0.00007457305,0.0016904924,0.00020649942,0.00016723566,0.7140134,0.28251585,0.000016241662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009689758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012199889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009689758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035372358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011826719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025664568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004773445","doi":"10.1017/9781108778879","title":"In the Shadow of Leviathan : John Locke and the Politics of Conscience","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Politics; Conscience; Philosophy; Emancipation; State of nature; Law; Political philosophy; Sovereignty; Shadow (psychology); Political science","score_opus":0.047639807069669776,"score_gpt":0.2400838927358342,"score_spread":0.19244408566616442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004773445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006365439,0.07814393,0.0013623055,0.14101174,0.0022590028,0.000013038965,0.000025464424,0.000036831425,0.77078223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5121917,0.020601902,0.001152855,0.033143867,0.0021943185,0.0000871151,0.000022466698,0.00008571528,0.43052003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991918,0.00047261326,0.000011462601,0.000058741683,0.00015153139,0.00011387351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.00039600622,0.00005059886,0.00005764574,0.00008444229,0.000101344864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011391867,0.0003071958,0.00020491192,0.0006682284,0.0068961596,0.005827383,0.0005605115,0.0021473516,0.005195361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029169105,0.00017949339,0.00014330837,0.00067666813,0.0172014,0.005504939,0.0022264018,0.004362272,0.0010678973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007739647,0.0000052804266,0.00007845422,0.000020346535,0.0000010779013,0.000067129964,0.006033343,0.000031154417,0.00003321894,0.919615,0.065777875,0.008329512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075395815,0.000006242419,0.0004533095,0.00025663024,0.0000014079313,0.00011706262,0.006441015,0.00007961225,0.000059519163,0.32252333,0.67004395,0.000010454963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01144154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03437821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01144154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034484598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003206355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02502042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009095845","doi":"10.7202/1067586ar","title":"ON HOBBES’ ARISTOTELITY","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Science et Esprit","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Eternity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Nothing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07768850292401068,"score_gpt":0.29876732086194263,"score_spread":0.22107881793793194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009095845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017921029,0.02117583,0.0118953185,0.039207507,0.0020790405,0.00001598738,0.000045591652,0.00004079372,0.90761894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8467131,0.008560502,0.0044343057,0.014076539,0.0033682275,0.000085075764,0.00006222122,0.000116222356,0.122583814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985436,0.0007579024,0.000025262401,0.00015664965,0.00036724342,0.00014944393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926907,0.00045429866,0.00004473288,0.000062176325,0.00011502677,0.000054550266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018477231,0.0003745324,0.00033953914,0.0012751641,0.0057259775,0.0040423586,0.0004360003,0.0016583209,0.004609765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027088006,0.00018559629,0.0002641905,0.00069399754,0.022123128,0.0037914899,0.0020525916,0.0038173434,0.0013537013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004094395,0.0000021721953,0.000023256267,0.0000050743897,6.905972e-7,0.000013088465,0.0014938333,0.000018720917,0.00002051963,0.99470586,0.002183084,0.0015296473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052185455,0.000011346726,0.00017886257,0.000060262264,0.0000015594228,0.000028919862,0.0010821057,0.00009202851,0.00009513371,0.8484625,0.14997625,0.0000058118226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003744218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004468047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057259775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031059168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011556173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022535145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016475592","doi":"","title":"Individualidad en la teoría spinoziana de la eternidad de la Mente","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Hermeneutic","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.025599368263514753,"score_gpt":0.32525225476701924,"score_spread":0.29965288650350447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016475592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21129636,0.005973627,0.025321972,0.012383711,0.00052549137,0.00005939049,0.00015916032,0.00014954909,0.74413073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666539,0.00097291166,0.0019859269,0.00040161746,0.000058025416,0.000014860576,0.00003409356,0.000031719464,0.029846951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978035,0.0009281592,0.000078308774,0.00030509726,0.00049627747,0.00038871774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985123,0.0004274116,0.00027717542,0.00022122219,0.00033609453,0.00022564265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001840066,0.0004635133,0.00028589438,0.0010128316,0.0036348207,0.0069126487,0.0006333201,0.0011488223,0.010671126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028446054,0.00024632207,0.00034124803,0.0010576587,0.013869275,0.00327731,0.0038704702,0.0018986706,0.0008736003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017168435,0.000036196197,0.011296097,0.00036478505,0.0000592689,0.0006709021,0.10435253,0.00037041897,0.0020332984,0.79638374,0.0037019528,0.08055916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004829264,0.00017422721,0.065441005,0.0010451535,0.00016402587,0.0021188552,0.11441881,0.0008344336,0.0021965075,0.20745619,0.6059451,0.00015735674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02071453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039444517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02071453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00449239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030879872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041187882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019864957","doi":"10.1017/s0034670520000029","title":"Susan Meld Shell, ed.: The Strauss-Krüger Correspondence: Returning to Plato through Kant. (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Pp. xii, 237.)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shell (structure); Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07320496870611776,"score_gpt":0.2981667926204021,"score_spread":0.22496182391428432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019864957","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018510302,0.9298508,0.00030660836,0.041700657,0.0035262671,0.000004147394,0.0000698919,0.000023615876,0.024332948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017239599,0.85801375,0.0009900632,0.014624661,0.00717891,0.000047154237,0.00015217977,0.00012968387,0.101624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898773,0.00038382638,0.000054113923,0.00013280343,0.00033889702,0.000102659826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988349,0.0006334891,0.00013158051,0.000049398957,0.00023340949,0.00011730882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016250071,0.0010979688,0.0006775134,0.002853941,0.0025281853,0.0043459106,0.0010926079,0.003489098,0.024590956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036472825,0.00080342154,0.00041336613,0.0035817064,0.003662941,0.008103003,0.001979826,0.0037842153,0.011728054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023922847,0.00000810208,0.00012821468,0.0005172914,0.000005920637,0.00006192316,0.0016508236,0.00007147691,0.000044524146,0.0482913,0.8828496,0.06634689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032404957,0.0000036011434,0.00035451996,0.0010386031,0.0000033286585,0.0001065594,0.0008035057,0.000022531887,0.000053539286,0.020054325,0.97754955,0.0000066876737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014574522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038096327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024590956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033819168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054333946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08226496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031589012","doi":"10.7202/1069833ar","title":"Laurens van Apeldoorn &amp; Robin Douglass, eds., \"Hobbes on Politics and Religion.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Politics; Theology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09707145238887106,"score_gpt":0.28445531705758936,"score_spread":0.18738386466871831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031589012","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000058588765,0.9890294,0.000116232775,0.005301468,0.002068121,0.0000018063328,0.000031172123,0.000004709695,0.0033886258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013695365,0.9876452,0.00016516472,0.00093582843,0.0016590249,0.000007363135,0.00005060307,0.000010076985,0.008157166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994512,0.00017527284,0.0000412434,0.00006937178,0.0002186965,0.000044126176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983627,0.0009713718,0.00010420359,0.000040404288,0.00038691898,0.00013438742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001283973,0.0009890953,0.0010153223,0.0027993054,0.0009971143,0.002841353,0.00097010314,0.0016116404,0.014548186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032011364,0.0005620219,0.00045229602,0.0048261383,0.0011840295,0.0045215585,0.0010682737,0.0021799724,0.007952028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006573133,0.00002271146,0.0003368052,0.0032867515,0.00004030037,0.000061219034,0.0010399278,0.00015313001,0.00016171177,0.01670666,0.7573138,0.2208112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006996633,0.000007673922,0.0010642725,0.0025169405,0.000024356317,0.00010384732,0.0005446932,0.00004827065,0.00010967019,0.0057043983,0.98986036,0.000008558731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017546583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0450391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017546583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019168303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036337124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048668504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035959231","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000386","title":"Causal Powers as Accidents: Thomas Aquinas’s View","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Power (physics); Epistemology; Philosophy; The Thing; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06601938636368865,"score_gpt":0.2672337783766281,"score_spread":0.20121439201293945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035959231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024889441,0.0112026995,0.0975221,0.14059605,0.0017439645,0.00007621631,0.00015041606,0.00018301593,0.7236361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93792206,0.004115483,0.007936228,0.01329345,0.001827093,0.00016960976,0.000041107298,0.00010568354,0.034589227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953269,0.0025482355,0.0001613736,0.00064348034,0.0008392341,0.000480789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430907,0.004114196,0.0003574199,0.0005548258,0.00043288764,0.00023157871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055510513,0.00062327215,0.00054467405,0.002484246,0.005701786,0.0066634687,0.0016549164,0.0070382026,0.0056519704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008225429,0.0005952493,0.0010114436,0.0012358675,0.055781834,0.017036762,0.0059477217,0.008142643,0.0008401405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011187041,0.0000010091375,0.000010155591,0.000004532675,6.374086e-7,0.000011621355,0.00065203576,0.00005096421,0.0000057154084,0.9986687,0.00035223487,0.00024131215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032959451,0.000002185245,0.000017502003,0.000017954068,0.0000022975155,0.000021789137,0.000360263,0.00013851373,0.000033734806,0.97937644,0.020022439,0.0000034797845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064240866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002436954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070382026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005715798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003374205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041471243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037985538","doi":"10.1111/nbfr.12560","title":"Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, and The Third Man Argument","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Blackfriars","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dominican University College","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Scholarship; Articulation (sociology); Epistemology; Argument map; Law; Argumentation theory; Medicine","score_opus":0.04569685101877339,"score_gpt":0.22752183999312092,"score_spread":0.18182498897434754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037985538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030422794,0.0592987,0.013502531,0.10620239,0.002690945,0.000026442052,0.000060318212,0.000063413885,0.7877325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.907445,0.013664642,0.0035922516,0.0087735355,0.0018186762,0.00004768164,0.000029958532,0.00006211183,0.06456619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822885,0.0010044592,0.00003977664,0.000118388474,0.00045065256,0.00015787201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827754,0.0011256596,0.00014091427,0.00008607929,0.00025150453,0.00011842734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025045434,0.0003367789,0.00037554168,0.0018863425,0.00596941,0.0041673603,0.0005849757,0.0023648972,0.0053442293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031292306,0.00015607534,0.00023769443,0.0013603073,0.021645779,0.0038117515,0.0017591881,0.0032144987,0.0006549478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003965837,0.0000028961824,0.0000266547,0.000010900764,0.0000010120644,0.000027202614,0.0012256982,0.00003227188,0.000013781736,0.99371994,0.0034397955,0.0014958694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006612535,0.00000849686,0.00017313263,0.0002135592,0.0000032050928,0.000049130605,0.0017749513,0.00025078017,0.00010605776,0.8270382,0.17036861,0.0000072842636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062480946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010601373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007590175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007590175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035479967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055070817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038055792","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.3.0326","title":"The Moral Sense in the Time of the Recluse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Recluse; Rhetoric; Darwin (ADL); Environmental ethics; Reflection (computer programming); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Theology; Linguistics; Poetry","score_opus":0.06630831190702248,"score_gpt":0.2260373133054254,"score_spread":0.1597290013984029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038055792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05742527,0.014110521,0.01844959,0.44677612,0.010176482,0.000039803854,0.00006886422,0.00012707071,0.45282635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714035,0.0010369443,0.0011892477,0.012740223,0.00102429,0.000022803064,0.000010763416,0.0000738265,0.012498489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875937,0.009400059,0.0002445938,0.0006177,0.0014103599,0.00073345995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98540986,0.00957189,0.0010852617,0.0008116055,0.0021163635,0.0010049549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012249667,0.00035782397,0.00049609906,0.0013062336,0.009674843,0.011227323,0.0011707057,0.0056910557,0.0036608777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023177518,0.00029146564,0.00030963126,0.0007691002,0.092549674,0.013177542,0.0056883907,0.013164156,0.0005291137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014898651,0.0000061098594,0.00010561729,0.000025830157,0.0000031470931,0.000106110885,0.042366005,0.000049680595,0.00008296862,0.94756585,0.007850817,0.001822988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018993333,0.000035204415,0.0003038003,0.00043330906,0.000010130338,0.0002553648,0.060742363,0.00028601274,0.00034694668,0.6741311,0.26339877,0.000038009985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030926513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026718557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012249667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007271818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037381148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064783216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041325515","doi":"10.1007/s11841-020-00775-8","title":"The ‘Magical World’ of Emotions and Its Triumph: on the Ontological Inconsistency in Sartre’s Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sophia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Naturalism; Philosophy; Direct and indirect realism; Determinism; Ontology; Continental philosophy; Psychology; Perception; Computer science","score_opus":0.13471687605272298,"score_gpt":0.26973308653193345,"score_spread":0.13501621047921047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041325515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027428726,0.005822626,0.16737004,0.1883733,0.0031755231,0.00013568798,0.00033839102,0.00029224285,0.60706353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90316933,0.0015374103,0.042321615,0.016524699,0.002050853,0.00044324266,0.0001405203,0.0003274447,0.033484925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970521,0.0016340191,0.00015582444,0.00051403826,0.00041571574,0.00022827489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970348,0.0018259359,0.00018901617,0.00042706006,0.00036762393,0.00015565864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055875317,0.0007111406,0.0009697894,0.0023389126,0.00497049,0.008956004,0.0025952982,0.0054365494,0.0060669146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806821,0.00069054315,0.0010905613,0.0012000102,0.053085584,0.016213547,0.004607168,0.011370229,0.001025737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028904235,0.0000016391543,0.00001400348,0.000005550881,0.000001031693,0.000009863048,0.0010454968,0.00002532172,0.000015902304,0.9977319,0.0006448681,0.0005015303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009690171,0.0000042675333,0.000043147942,0.00002897816,0.0000031998584,0.000031291085,0.00050701207,0.00031139073,0.000038084207,0.98549867,0.013516448,0.000007956062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048470977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037194637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008956004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004228085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022019604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03067702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30429852","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2018.02504","title":"La categoría de la vitalidad en el último Croce","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zibaldone","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013407940615778232,"score_gpt":0.2697700938045164,"score_spread":0.2563621531887382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30429852","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042442482,0.59239703,0.0034984304,0.04887269,0.011137919,0.00008845918,0.0012854672,0.00022855769,0.30004892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35466322,0.50403136,0.004783386,0.011637238,0.009564551,0.00021395541,0.0021019957,0.00022762473,0.112776704],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.00023348756,0.00011123649,0.00020029006,0.00047106404,0.00022749252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987295,0.000463975,0.0002398607,0.00011078092,0.00032718387,0.0001286198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001368166,0.0004518246,0.0006446455,0.0033673726,0.0014552459,0.0035068865,0.0006237131,0.0012622813,0.01707307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004314606,0.00013396487,0.0003538523,0.004273671,0.0031606127,0.0023198978,0.0020115871,0.0022884477,0.0034625004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027054115,0.000049292605,0.011239368,0.0019410305,0.00004488404,0.0008039288,0.010411379,0.00009885,0.0013885214,0.19870456,0.0901239,0.6849237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008188918,0.000028991619,0.007911614,0.0007910256,0.000013159792,0.00097039726,0.0019456472,0.00002703842,0.0001451195,0.0044315527,0.9837135,0.000013838879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00845384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009026783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01707307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028725185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020143804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057115078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045963797","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12711","title":"Spinoza on the Limits of Explanation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intentionality; Doctrine; Epistemology; Intelligibility (philosophy); Counterintuitive; Philosophy; Psychology; Direct and indirect realism; Perception","score_opus":0.61521691147994,"score_gpt":0.3809295647666574,"score_spread":0.23428734671328255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045963797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04510041,0.01922168,0.09451879,0.5214163,0.0018698319,0.00007225697,0.0004786909,0.00035933088,0.31696272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679878,0.002732903,0.0078076827,0.013031034,0.0010956541,0.00018953289,0.00010547525,0.00010835964,0.0069415914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986741,0.0073527293,0.00066182076,0.0023544524,0.00212428,0.0007657246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654079,0.025524937,0.0014334692,0.004585877,0.0023137205,0.00073405344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01564843,0.000632067,0.0011830335,0.0032183882,0.0062129786,0.009791579,0.0022477796,0.006701498,0.008719504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029793583,0.000510923,0.0010423616,0.0017715152,0.07275086,0.021260673,0.008732444,0.012458409,0.0010072922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008894586,0.0000027288816,0.000077675795,0.000023595645,0.000003953251,0.000030068713,0.0011640335,0.000109482055,0.00002581886,0.9959382,0.0016543939,0.0009612239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009256792,0.00000191281,0.00006853575,0.000059733145,0.00000437199,0.000017947172,0.00048820584,0.00030871088,0.000059024234,0.9860071,0.01297082,0.000004404263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006251311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032046912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008263795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046574813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08275777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080778100","doi":"10.7202/1070838ar","title":"Exode, colonie, révolution : Machiavel, Spinoza et la démocratie originaire","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.060322075704520244,"score_gpt":0.302910248457808,"score_spread":0.24258817275328776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080778100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36086687,0.020183427,0.0018857602,0.02377676,0.00029248145,0.0000167519,0.00005514655,0.000022436237,0.59290034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98368376,0.0014493403,0.00018706775,0.00046787347,0.00004587096,0.0000069319212,0.000008269913,0.000007987683,0.014142833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995346,0.00019322321,0.000011851615,0.00006776532,0.000048993235,0.00014368404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963915,0.00016892244,0.00007065952,0.000036355654,0.000028682447,0.00005616318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008021646,0.0001667828,0.00017887831,0.0007497311,0.005097141,0.0057876282,0.000259265,0.0008118176,0.0036042295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081645953,0.00010558732,0.00013814458,0.0009541979,0.016705135,0.0022756185,0.0017204251,0.002068843,0.00018864305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018734443,0.0000073386122,0.0011372452,0.00002756938,0.000002282011,0.00008236924,0.018530456,0.000032396216,0.00008355824,0.9745092,0.0006375578,0.004931276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060182643,0.000075613476,0.025362596,0.0006169371,0.000034935296,0.00048156446,0.06834727,0.00046100264,0.00076707953,0.34909126,0.55466235,0.000039164057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019079436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04475427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019079436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056309383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023821965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040855527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081438805","doi":"","title":"Absolutist Knowledge and Hermeneutic Faith: Hobbes and Milton on the Problem of Fallen Language","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œalbatross","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Faith; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Politics; Absurdity; Reading (process); Order (exchange); Theology; Hermeneutics; Literature; Linguistics; Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04779251178469964,"score_gpt":0.24532320211016,"score_spread":0.19753069032546036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081438805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16983579,0.028342828,0.028934188,0.1911567,0.0014333188,0.000043906337,0.00004274372,0.00008271378,0.58012784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756944,0.001977308,0.0023497597,0.0042394814,0.00039110446,0.000044974247,0.000007563284,0.000041844036,0.015253432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562824,0.0032875568,0.000051827177,0.00022212003,0.00041847883,0.0003916897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958127,0.0032701762,0.0001945093,0.0002721485,0.00021582967,0.00023450221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057515632,0.0004285194,0.0005721977,0.0019568307,0.008778324,0.009912294,0.0009977877,0.0043855812,0.003169677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00679475,0.00035538102,0.00029755675,0.0011480225,0.070278876,0.012515997,0.0058130855,0.0063854395,0.00037988144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054953252,0.0000066518433,0.000044321583,0.000005925888,8.02577e-7,0.000031480908,0.01857231,0.000028811219,0.000023742035,0.9792514,0.00095233787,0.0010766808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010380451,0.00001117976,0.00012112684,0.00008982542,0.0000023134369,0.000053267733,0.016922101,0.00026901346,0.00009834451,0.94247466,0.03993819,0.000009553769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055068866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007043984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009912294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064195534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022300878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046577334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084410903","doi":"10.1177/0090591720952056","title":"Laughing with Leviathan: Hobbesian Laughter in Theory and Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Rhetoric; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Adversary; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05017537227571865,"score_gpt":0.2822843875170103,"score_spread":0.23210901524129163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084410903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12511128,0.07294428,0.0663746,0.15724447,0.004338883,0.00011552839,0.000040780422,0.00025281316,0.5735774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685327,0.00866115,0.0056980248,0.0043374235,0.00061946124,0.000107729466,0.000016678665,0.00015314086,0.011873654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869158,0.011193133,0.0001917429,0.00058986695,0.0006722383,0.0004371794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809404,0.016186642,0.00046052734,0.000955169,0.0006942577,0.0007630145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129629215,0.00071791554,0.0007249059,0.0028162128,0.012017083,0.013769226,0.0015582696,0.004899411,0.004316335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01680735,0.00055429206,0.00032823454,0.0018309986,0.06540171,0.01040012,0.0058209146,0.0058112503,0.0013261492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029605368,0.00004013238,0.00036666356,0.0001424428,0.000006836061,0.00022931132,0.2684663,0.00016903569,0.00018247524,0.7107435,0.0054185255,0.01420524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035021516,0.00008464225,0.000976815,0.0021952845,0.00001712393,0.00030467886,0.21579732,0.0012058013,0.0007656638,0.5202112,0.25835693,0.000049415055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041707535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004963604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013769226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007126066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037465203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068555295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084659787","doi":"","title":"Review of \"Steven Nadler, L’eresia di Spinoza: l’immortalità e lo spirito ebraico\"","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04147805631421449,"score_gpt":0.29621628098964925,"score_spread":0.2547382246754348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084659787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008110396,0.6271343,0.00010537184,0.26619393,0.10221618,0.000010523048,0.00013498166,0.000012838239,0.004110647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021125877,0.60454035,0.00013806428,0.24377587,0.12979835,0.000046590936,0.00022990016,0.000041911353,0.019316373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781954,0.0005431873,0.0002360576,0.000351146,0.00088189146,0.00016815134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890354,0.005233616,0.0006950955,0.00021969843,0.004006789,0.000809341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033059148,0.0011162338,0.0017213147,0.004162938,0.0021188143,0.0054448266,0.0024642176,0.0074213333,0.008221924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017215455,0.00053132174,0.00056133344,0.0046149357,0.0029606954,0.0051953434,0.0029193994,0.008028717,0.005945191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006845428,0.0000034928096,0.000031263055,0.00055836,0.0000057413195,0.000015083736,0.000063518164,0.000009716435,0.000016303016,0.001340138,0.988247,0.009702625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004392255,0.000002793373,0.00023440422,0.0010813095,0.0000069423395,0.00003435156,0.00010681927,0.000006166853,0.000015339629,0.00038226446,0.99812,0.0000051785305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018126586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043954816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018126586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047113965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083052665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036042154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085398481","doi":"10.29173/spectrum80","title":"The “Absence of Chance” and the “Serving of Ends”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spectrum","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Instinct; Foundation (evidence); Nothing; Teleology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.03452152088224806,"score_gpt":0.21561758089848485,"score_spread":0.1810960600162368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085398481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047548536,0.012806109,0.0939629,0.032942645,0.0012705543,0.00004965629,0.000104388186,0.00007238983,0.8112428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96248055,0.003093878,0.012976025,0.0025906959,0.00060646655,0.00009786204,0.000044240223,0.000044130997,0.018066049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473816,0.002915214,0.00018577134,0.0006183131,0.0011686038,0.00037387776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956416,0.002969505,0.0003722937,0.00046183594,0.00038122016,0.00017355337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00412296,0.00036690178,0.00048013724,0.0016527796,0.0054997257,0.0053850967,0.0006844283,0.0028474662,0.0029318836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004468885,0.0002753311,0.000454283,0.0010997117,0.062413804,0.008013772,0.0031953158,0.002924388,0.0004718969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025012184,0.0000015151456,0.000048177386,0.000011107249,0.0000010938243,0.000013795498,0.0013019233,0.000039620307,0.000030802257,0.99705625,0.00034224367,0.0011508997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004421203,0.000007992253,0.0002527695,0.00006087883,0.0000024963435,0.000059479396,0.0010609318,0.00015648185,0.00010569479,0.9519852,0.046295304,0.000008393377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021214313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002822288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054997257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034410167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002593212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024966478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090725951","doi":"10.4324/9781315210049-4","title":"The Findings: Realist Lore and Liberal Principles: Another Case for Muted Optimism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimism; Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12592770888823945,"score_gpt":0.274252100695691,"score_spread":0.14832439180745155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090725951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021811062,0.0072494876,0.0074358,0.5071071,0.0022510756,0.000031558084,0.00011700832,0.00008599526,0.4539109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8002183,0.0050515165,0.0056770137,0.08141631,0.0019656618,0.00010023449,0.0000858115,0.00029656637,0.10518865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928987,0.00399658,0.00014198925,0.00071129116,0.0015326608,0.0007186945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99032927,0.005988732,0.00058257236,0.0012466554,0.0012034237,0.0006492944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011271907,0.00036458278,0.0003699453,0.0015266322,0.0064972206,0.013880843,0.0013454766,0.0036880001,0.0074105863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016092965,0.0002361268,0.00035485084,0.0012016572,0.054047745,0.014741891,0.0044502323,0.012073966,0.0014926327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008903757,0.000008629818,0.00017960503,0.000020279116,0.0000037162997,0.000059072947,0.01186138,0.000049932816,0.00004127631,0.9622638,0.021592408,0.003911017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017063912,0.000010633487,0.00053613883,0.00020550675,0.00000475262,0.00014615798,0.019766493,0.00018049273,0.00019643882,0.61663914,0.36227602,0.000021178337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062503093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008979304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013880843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067961668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057601565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059612274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094092452","doi":"10.25145/j.laguna.2020.46.06","title":"La prevalencia como precursor ético primordial. (De Spinoza a Damasio)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Filosofía Laguna","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroethics; Natural (archaeology); Order (exchange); Epistemology; Philosophy; Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Neuroscience; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05428141356565802,"score_gpt":0.262150651822375,"score_spread":0.207869238256717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094092452","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24701244,0.12014484,0.02331325,0.38790527,0.0048323693,0.00008850376,0.0014432804,0.00022602963,0.21503404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95591533,0.016005248,0.0043645366,0.0113420235,0.0029152266,0.000050733466,0.00018298822,0.000076567274,0.009147414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762243,0.0007342496,0.00012038396,0.00078591215,0.0004393982,0.0002975982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950362,0.002412488,0.0012972304,0.00042090047,0.0005280055,0.00030523428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004746432,0.00044180008,0.0005292219,0.0026018957,0.001912379,0.004771915,0.00075263774,0.0030770737,0.006614581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015328253,0.00031154533,0.0004006926,0.0020425946,0.014887575,0.005583337,0.0035109029,0.0047585587,0.0006569182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035967616,0.00002555377,0.019482505,0.00024887122,0.00002135633,0.001030177,0.010232814,0.00007318678,0.00033031983,0.9141782,0.01359269,0.040748354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030394007,0.00006859953,0.026549445,0.0013379698,0.00007958527,0.01090832,0.0085593285,0.00043649308,0.0009052933,0.6515844,0.299453,0.00008727646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005214651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004070957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006614581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018351943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028853924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02510184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094144381","doi":"","title":"Spinoza’s Authority Volume II: Resistance and Power in the Political Treatises","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Western Sydney; Royal Holloway, University of London; York University","keywords":"Politics; Resistance (ecology); Power (physics); Volume (thermodynamics); Political authority; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology; Physics; Thermodynamics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03627693300994447,"score_gpt":0.25461281293921534,"score_spread":0.21833587992927087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094144381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040016104,0.012446787,0.0011595155,0.012877111,0.0012234387,0.0000192259,0.000037736114,0.000034534813,0.96820015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29014367,0.015515911,0.0009967696,0.0039708754,0.0016867642,0.00008999916,0.000111690555,0.00014665298,0.6873377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993493,0.00019204443,0.00002083008,0.00006640107,0.00027538653,0.000096005235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995486,0.00024386846,0.000040575494,0.00004065614,0.00007764353,0.00004848477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005217328,0.00031445085,0.00027765587,0.0014053883,0.004414554,0.008385527,0.00044615733,0.0012549129,0.008200783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014054532,0.00018263215,0.00022422988,0.0016821895,0.007852715,0.004322574,0.0014709977,0.0032700747,0.0013731341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052812447,0.00000568235,0.000069693924,0.00002799395,9.194641e-7,0.0000206017,0.0041030734,0.00004190712,0.000056010467,0.94078517,0.045541186,0.009342449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040705513,0.0000061307073,0.000442725,0.00014841181,0.0000028511142,0.00004888458,0.003230488,0.00007030865,0.00010239414,0.0926921,0.90324616,0.0000054030957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011706204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019262582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011706204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067964788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034615658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049312115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105123942","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.2","title":"Natural Rights and Natural Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Law; Private property; Natural (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Politics; Property rights; Institution; Relevance (law); Political science; Political philosophy; Property law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.04153733218192515,"score_gpt":0.2487236682929578,"score_spread":0.20718633611103265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105123942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037024335,0.009840242,0.005532962,0.017710244,0.00035865628,0.000015021814,0.000053509928,0.000026819302,0.96276015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66625184,0.014253127,0.007311704,0.014175754,0.0022497482,0.00018910853,0.0001926619,0.000119542325,0.2952565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842024,0.0007428928,0.000031950396,0.00020750775,0.00038497167,0.00021251843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889815,0.0006971247,0.00005645146,0.00012886734,0.00014426155,0.0000751716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016723999,0.00026630185,0.00026420483,0.0010017591,0.00410981,0.0048095495,0.0006347492,0.0020923852,0.015830921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023262813,0.00011849168,0.00026012913,0.0009164211,0.020830344,0.006554089,0.0026732767,0.0030210055,0.0018944814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2207256e-7,0.0000013651645,0.00001018045,0.0000034131895,1.4524831e-7,0.0000041545627,0.00019995746,0.000014474347,0.0000053514705,0.9977582,0.0011184227,0.00088394445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019572717,0.000003445381,0.00010642344,0.00005313538,5.5285886e-7,0.00002306024,0.00037932952,0.000068229325,0.000026496702,0.78380346,0.21553145,0.0000024453648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007694908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075749434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015830921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051654913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032536974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05295974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107484652","doi":"","title":"Thomas Hobbes, Comedian","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Science Reviewer","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Contempt; LEVIATHAN (cipher); Laughter; Harm; Politics; Reputation; Law; Racism; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.11231554403286571,"score_gpt":0.296006524206292,"score_spread":0.18369098017342628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107484652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020274508,0.13019018,0.0021311468,0.30568638,0.061720345,0.000030388623,0.00022130071,0.00025127275,0.49774152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048354417,0.03325876,0.0010545459,0.062684394,0.012572481,0.00006379291,0.00014976609,0.0002760595,0.8415857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00025821864,0.00003760226,0.00020693851,0.00029582475,0.00006914914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906427,0.0003077686,0.000055135686,0.000053587086,0.00036512475,0.00015414406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006655599,0.00057029806,0.00036046235,0.001241701,0.005217915,0.0050173705,0.0005016063,0.0024559023,0.022881951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030605346,0.00023239838,0.00018055628,0.0008018841,0.00312198,0.0030398157,0.0010443397,0.003731667,0.009255548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001566259,0.0000075790344,0.00012245645,0.0000656991,0.0000025973993,0.00008522228,0.0017008329,0.00003030692,0.00011345499,0.09644779,0.8850678,0.016340625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012382833,0.0000022286358,0.00010151871,0.000052795902,6.253652e-7,0.000043214506,0.0004192776,0.00001316301,0.000053656884,0.00467437,0.99463505,0.0000029567798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011697941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029579157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022881951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003249526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019338976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07654774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110192423","doi":"10.7202/1074036ar","title":"Dana Villa, \"Teachers of the People: Political Education in Rousseau, Hegel, Tocqueville, and Mill.\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Mill; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04621827607839693,"score_gpt":0.2757918997365367,"score_spread":0.2295736236581398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110192423","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057204936,0.9407498,0.00005024801,0.050576836,0.0036067348,0.000004864432,0.00005319353,0.0000096496515,0.0048913974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071165976,0.88791746,0.00028680696,0.0707789,0.005563818,0.0000787283,0.00018299416,0.00005425478,0.028020415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707246,0.0013588454,0.00012618871,0.00023031718,0.0009861041,0.00022601952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938777,0.0033297269,0.00046763328,0.0000971676,0.0017953307,0.000432448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030415445,0.0009085135,0.00088019855,0.0037621418,0.0033607122,0.003799277,0.0017405296,0.005041976,0.011022726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010229726,0.00051987666,0.0004800457,0.0053836,0.0022177063,0.0063354988,0.0019243712,0.0050833663,0.0045817755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022924667,0.000007820349,0.00012931351,0.0016201669,0.000014605669,0.000026447478,0.0008315496,0.0000121274325,0.000034380315,0.009928101,0.9543798,0.032992713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011012637,0.0000068846807,0.00085197564,0.0023798302,0.000015742322,0.000044691744,0.00071149226,0.000007544912,0.00004487569,0.0025299096,0.9933869,0.000009228189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08715646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20938198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08715646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006270285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01327016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17329836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128286846","doi":"10.1525/rh.2021.39.1.121","title":"Review: <i>Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Thomas Hobbes</i>, by Timothy Raylor","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetorica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Theology","score_opus":0.03096362036852181,"score_gpt":0.24400880224809934,"score_spread":0.21304518187957752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128286846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033626657,0.90621406,0.000041449828,0.062242527,0.030175539,0.0000076140354,0.000051320316,0.000008070774,0.0012258332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012631556,0.8419926,0.00010003027,0.08253731,0.06766686,0.000057293306,0.0001035384,0.000019073443,0.006260183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795985,0.0006419156,0.00018237994,0.00036184798,0.00066948973,0.00018452751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933013,0.0034266207,0.0005512911,0.0001599142,0.00188267,0.0006782733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030999784,0.0019104569,0.0030898345,0.0046589444,0.0020410023,0.007223477,0.0024651706,0.008049474,0.011035848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012631162,0.0008961342,0.0009908613,0.007512995,0.005043777,0.00628582,0.0028526154,0.009612071,0.0060215294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020422849,0.0000063662387,0.000028494165,0.0016162201,0.000018277757,0.00001232079,0.00005141482,0.00001714464,0.000027949116,0.0014775955,0.97998387,0.016739845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003279407,0.000017229113,0.00035572564,0.00505817,0.000047122598,0.00009100746,0.00016510722,0.0000229934,0.000029613077,0.0024962064,0.9916677,0.000016243395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011723809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02363902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011723809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048312005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008858472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03691864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132663856","doi":"10.7202/1076216ar","title":"Alexandre Matheron, \"Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza.\" Trans. David Maruzzella and Gil Morejón. Filippo del Lucchese, David Maruzzella and Gil Morejon (Eds.)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Politics; Humanities; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0539374489682946,"score_gpt":0.2826015780110846,"score_spread":0.22866412904279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132663856","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018680739,0.9533668,0.00038565532,0.035783313,0.0015549182,0.0000050111053,0.00005087338,0.000010909828,0.008655703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01437897,0.94811344,0.0011582163,0.014167815,0.0032987746,0.00005150817,0.00011758751,0.000031905107,0.01868169],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983987,0.000677678,0.00009128399,0.00017593401,0.00056932325,0.00008709216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976272,0.0015552641,0.00021766292,0.000061459206,0.00042016708,0.0001182429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002296159,0.00092270615,0.0008134511,0.0042260415,0.002401388,0.0040445914,0.001373768,0.0033919008,0.008017384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040190485,0.00057888875,0.0005294664,0.005347381,0.004024395,0.009028023,0.0015477518,0.0034566086,0.0034432132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008101776,0.000022577904,0.000758915,0.002616655,0.00005883368,0.00015204861,0.00570441,0.00016570599,0.00015211475,0.1722185,0.6933573,0.12471194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010819285,0.0000069196353,0.0018377067,0.0026933735,0.000029732824,0.0001339952,0.0013864912,0.000045096138,0.000098578996,0.057481695,0.93626034,0.000015215789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035050757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07611211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035050757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048700348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047694356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069693446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132855684","doi":"10.5325/miltonstudies.63.1.0001","title":"The Pleasure of Milton","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Milton Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Meaning (existential); Poetry; Reading (process); Value (mathematics); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Psychology; Art; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.15559961222028537,"score_gpt":0.3158371512461978,"score_spread":0.16023753902591245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132855684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032673385,0.018319434,0.0034272014,0.16762479,0.0037926992,0.00002368593,0.000036337155,0.00007766903,0.7740248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8543514,0.0031612716,0.0010295693,0.016342014,0.0014105496,0.00005151982,0.000011982984,0.00007547054,0.12356614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996804,0.002066193,0.0000531579,0.00030378377,0.0004744658,0.0002984299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706036,0.0017280639,0.00019759817,0.00028418232,0.00030156627,0.00042825134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002773187,0.00048785083,0.00032672938,0.0012069248,0.0081497785,0.009710012,0.00057157985,0.0025288167,0.007275234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006904051,0.00026806566,0.00019768483,0.00057701254,0.024032349,0.008201532,0.0064712903,0.006182211,0.0009556959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023654206,0.0000103299935,0.0001746861,0.00002707714,0.0000027511558,0.00010434177,0.019681724,0.00003299824,0.0001079317,0.935908,0.037047658,0.006878835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000823257,0.000026567053,0.00029025125,0.0002845328,0.0000050050007,0.00022412757,0.01199498,0.00014315725,0.00033348062,0.19936365,0.78730834,0.000017738785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015979328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019978143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009710012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003563728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019268858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025856793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143062287","doi":"10.3138/ecf.33.3.475","title":"<i>Anecdotes of Enlightenment: Human Nature from Locke to Wordsworth</i> by James Robert Wood","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Art history; Literature; Art; Classics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011711429112450891,"score_gpt":0.23022624786148513,"score_spread":0.21851481874903422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143062287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030658437,0.08905378,0.0018949896,0.30886376,0.023380406,0.00008095366,0.00029381263,0.00009575959,0.545678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40918353,0.03500281,0.001069816,0.098622024,0.009866713,0.00016246008,0.0001698256,0.00041307745,0.4455098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973781,0.0014868507,0.000066873356,0.00019641417,0.00043530826,0.00043655795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925126,0.0060518105,0.000358751,0.00019285748,0.0004941558,0.00038977477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020713708,0.00085526035,0.00061062264,0.0024083285,0.017634498,0.01017724,0.0010857153,0.005630086,0.00997752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007873998,0.00044090397,0.00028908782,0.0034247849,0.018744815,0.009960183,0.006138703,0.01069736,0.0014806526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047287172,0.000038990474,0.00019593119,0.000284371,0.000009871884,0.0007675564,0.23105942,0.000043317934,0.00031196498,0.2833545,0.47419724,0.009689532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037294394,0.000008776893,0.0003084169,0.00042675863,0.0000033631136,0.00020133749,0.06587038,0.000014894443,0.0001579489,0.004987718,0.9280036,0.000012979029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018916545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05924557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018916545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005127352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022603935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037612855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146506616","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12280","title":"Debating ethical nominalism in Early Enlightenment thought on China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Enlightenment; Universalism; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Relativism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05935979418168738,"score_gpt":0.3092899873389791,"score_spread":0.24993019315729173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146506616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009183,0.0025831661,0.0066202027,0.036975436,0.00034277933,0.00004834318,0.000021076834,0.00004030581,0.15245044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652135,0.00015276182,0.00023482041,0.0005488158,0.000037997434,0.000008319526,0.000003468743,0.0000065115146,0.0024859428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940037,0.003764628,0.000121440724,0.00039723754,0.0007028504,0.0010101062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544805,0.0028003408,0.00043160524,0.000310614,0.00057493406,0.0004343911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014147078,0.00046090983,0.00052854966,0.0019631959,0.011099971,0.0067722397,0.0011852923,0.0031995347,0.0015898569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00685405,0.0003670851,0.00032205187,0.0014785145,0.056411527,0.0047262986,0.004909008,0.0050884886,0.000103081285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032033604,0.000018812394,0.0012834213,0.000032996195,0.00000820969,0.00033597316,0.25759086,0.00044249496,0.0004455746,0.735577,0.0009384214,0.0032943136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060900547,0.00013126609,0.011071481,0.0005423996,0.000039058577,0.00019389662,0.25634104,0.0068466444,0.002377347,0.5815435,0.14070563,0.00014686504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045443587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038168512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045443587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03258773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010624967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23644161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159131685","doi":"10.29173/psur222","title":"Virtue and Virtu: A Debate in the Importance of Values and Justice for Leaders of State","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Sociology; Through-the-lens metering; Aesthetics; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Lens (geology); Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08518869577663757,"score_gpt":0.3383092607252669,"score_spread":0.25312056494862933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159131685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03349828,0.30319914,0.0052167685,0.4530852,0.0059362478,0.000020185915,0.000031023385,0.000019259256,0.19899386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85414225,0.08457818,0.0010526697,0.045766253,0.0050211297,0.00005695785,0.000021460139,0.00002592505,0.009335191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395955,0.0045152637,0.00009358173,0.00033169982,0.0008028158,0.00029715238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99078816,0.007843622,0.00041392623,0.00022585601,0.00047585202,0.00025256997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007891496,0.00019999268,0.00052273227,0.001600821,0.0049813855,0.00800374,0.0010129643,0.0038930047,0.0015612867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008510457,0.00014806617,0.00022515384,0.0018133984,0.03594957,0.006712779,0.0031325181,0.006764607,0.00020291537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009533267,0.000003865175,0.000119589175,0.000111365036,0.000003408787,0.000034743505,0.0049590515,0.000020594862,0.000023346918,0.9828447,0.0039711324,0.007898644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016711077,0.00004362991,0.0020187749,0.0030281623,0.000010098211,0.00018626374,0.028167266,0.00018487487,0.00018084268,0.68827623,0.2778663,0.000020859048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033548705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005848907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00800374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036129993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005375696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041734695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160305191","doi":"","title":"Thucydide en Angleterre. Luca Iori, Thucydides Anglicus. Gli Eight Books di Thomas Hobbes e la ricezione delle Storie di Tucidide (1450-1642), Roma Edizioni di storia e litteratura, collana Pleiadi, 19, 2015)","year":2016,"lang":"it","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.01845064746047425,"score_gpt":0.23371006779004083,"score_spread":0.21525942032956658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160305191","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002431952,0.4879592,0.00079105713,0.06956801,0.019589754,0.000024481898,0.00071132125,0.00017763556,0.41874653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058333058,0.118684605,0.0010818517,0.017887438,0.0110334875,0.00006200346,0.00042974277,0.00035299262,0.7921348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995115,0.00010647578,0.000018850817,0.00012506467,0.0001668516,0.00007134661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969435,0.000090379974,0.0000440405,0.00003112491,0.000093558665,0.000046584715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005326467,0.0009470856,0.00044453927,0.0015412493,0.0030964334,0.0041966345,0.00044534577,0.0018529966,0.041532088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014378121,0.00040792624,0.00024866383,0.0019762865,0.0031273507,0.004099324,0.0018953526,0.0032977373,0.013729292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007420008,0.000017316808,0.0004932298,0.0002809615,0.000008379134,0.00008169049,0.0038969584,0.000025731273,0.000297739,0.095756285,0.83205,0.067017436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026813598,0.0000041498206,0.000590773,0.00014532648,0.0000018914058,0.000051309435,0.0005315117,0.000008483227,0.00007209931,0.002609686,0.99597895,0.0000030424962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02146401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06347852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041532088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031829192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013476285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13893872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165121497","doi":"","title":"Spinoza’s Authority in the Treatises: An Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Western Sydney; Royal Holloway, University of London; York University","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05847216696471918,"score_gpt":0.29123566628603015,"score_spread":0.23276349932131096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165121497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005025964,0.03332549,0.009293974,0.028118452,0.002876455,0.000056672874,0.00018788404,0.00008033666,0.9210347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5442403,0.054456357,0.010868045,0.012234052,0.00463671,0.0003902054,0.00044534774,0.0004765333,0.37225246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855596,0.0005364859,0.00007732579,0.00012400754,0.00040685627,0.00029929756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931633,0.00043648624,0.000041895382,0.000040024846,0.00011044387,0.000054846645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012000878,0.0004570207,0.00053608476,0.0022216442,0.0063803536,0.0091480855,0.00070446904,0.0022858907,0.012954878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026073174,0.00036923538,0.0004955702,0.0034604608,0.007843096,0.0061881673,0.0018276906,0.0060568075,0.0023282643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003250974,0.0000053202575,0.000047246776,0.000036907903,8.0806694e-7,0.000019354085,0.0013033228,0.000035094352,0.000030241974,0.98303926,0.0100531615,0.005426083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030553772,0.00000627461,0.0003631345,0.00024571447,0.0000031070165,0.000054691158,0.0014493221,0.00009480927,0.00007290135,0.14430283,0.8533939,0.000010229261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027192991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033024654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027192991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006781997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004800809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0540694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165263521","doi":"10.1017/9781108778879.008","title":"Locke and a ‘More Liberal’ Hobbism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Politics; Reputation; Liberalism; Sovereignty; Fallacy; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Religious studies; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04599086829595537,"score_gpt":0.1954271684915393,"score_spread":0.14943630019558393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165263521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019321566,0.016939085,0.0024693923,0.027616844,0.00088215823,0.000013759149,0.00001990968,0.00005216274,0.9326851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6312538,0.004767494,0.0015397667,0.01076903,0.00064519595,0.000041376243,0.000026656182,0.0001280378,0.35082868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818283,0.00094403164,0.000031274885,0.00016927515,0.00038646685,0.00028601725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989637,0.0005006062,0.00007043422,0.00014441706,0.00012403476,0.00019680789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013808229,0.0003050766,0.00025701724,0.0012741267,0.0066720117,0.007474798,0.0004877641,0.0016666165,0.010090238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025065623,0.0001815614,0.00016847113,0.0007601554,0.02668329,0.0046821646,0.0035068695,0.0051023327,0.0016925934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082628185,0.000010036759,0.000059051337,0.000019266488,8.4218715e-7,0.000031601423,0.010970751,0.000015803644,0.00007996369,0.97509843,0.009481554,0.0042244527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072256075,0.00001551903,0.00030005287,0.00015082679,0.0000017687062,0.00014073089,0.006233894,0.000060748513,0.00014926279,0.12851068,0.8644199,0.000009353431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047090473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0110770585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010090238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004300854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020773336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033755183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165962043","doi":"10.3138/utq.90.1.03","title":"Identity over Time in <i>Paradise Lost</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Representation (politics); Constitution; Paradise; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; History; Law; Politics; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.014866738821263725,"score_gpt":0.20813925472156247,"score_spread":0.19327251590029876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165962043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24274075,0.007164921,0.011228754,0.026584718,0.0011611528,0.000033678018,0.00006784086,0.00007085598,0.7109473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95146173,0.00062377815,0.00061991275,0.00065557245,0.00012628111,0.00001415074,0.000028201373,0.000031492964,0.04643891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988217,0.00038456198,0.000032759668,0.00021706523,0.00022023826,0.00032370244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995493,0.000101487436,0.00007986401,0.00007819996,0.00007881427,0.00011241052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001219565,0.00023343724,0.0002480626,0.0009909114,0.00890818,0.010738642,0.0007956355,0.0014389758,0.004132166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016000591,0.00018440386,0.00027948312,0.0008831902,0.030531578,0.011042199,0.005980452,0.0037198348,0.00036700934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015089259,0.000006882365,0.00031362893,0.00001540187,0.0000015015696,0.000118112956,0.068535894,0.000036192767,0.00007895974,0.9248496,0.0025634794,0.0034653456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013286282,0.00004327572,0.002410372,0.00015745661,0.000009825171,0.0006056494,0.10419453,0.00027323162,0.00045287216,0.36489224,0.526913,0.000034285436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014006406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01493545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014006406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008275045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022052105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060039937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176501039","doi":"10.1086/714238","title":"The Encounter of Faith and Reason in the Western Tradition and Its Significance Today","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Biography; Classics; Transcription (linguistics); Epistemology; Literature; History; Art; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03143743539345363,"score_gpt":0.24480709498931952,"score_spread":0.2133696595958659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176501039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16147777,0.14864713,0.0041588494,0.20045932,0.009160418,0.000015381815,0.000036902115,0.0000897284,0.47595447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450425,0.013626967,0.0007106522,0.006434658,0.0026197343,0.000012399142,0.000010751757,0.000039458995,0.031502906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987513,0.00076302554,0.00003333626,0.000081451115,0.00018467013,0.00018627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984843,0.0011088578,0.00012394285,0.00008179936,0.00009223625,0.00010891504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016579673,0.00022916165,0.00022071764,0.0008345143,0.0065900376,0.0053565516,0.00029512815,0.0016387828,0.001887803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002247983,0.00014517184,0.000116169096,0.0012277167,0.023225695,0.004898609,0.001913489,0.0035761187,0.00028794134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003835371,0.0000107871,0.0005503029,0.00007973781,0.00000409677,0.00025105634,0.20391633,0.00005323469,0.00021755563,0.7605256,0.016044274,0.018308692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116375495,0.000040679985,0.0037767747,0.0007335617,0.000010823518,0.0007918271,0.09310129,0.00022193843,0.0004089501,0.19447915,0.70638424,0.000039110888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063886116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010560942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065900376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031033796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015780696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022516668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202198325","doi":"10.7202/1081495ar","title":"Homer like Thucydides? Hobbes and the Translation of the Homeric Poems as an Educational Tool","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TTR traduction terminologie rédaction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Period (music); Literature; Virtue; Nothing; Political philosophy; Ancient Greek; Philosophy; Poetry; Classics; Amusement; History; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Art; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08702341891611441,"score_gpt":0.29028742738098123,"score_spread":0.2032640084648668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202198325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061046325,0.014929796,0.008811326,0.021776797,0.0033353232,0.000032360127,0.000068282854,0.00016866003,0.8898311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712593,0.004849058,0.0028471355,0.0021902565,0.0009756872,0.00003498651,0.00004692602,0.00024901752,0.11754767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986859,0.0009599748,0.000028939201,0.000082331135,0.00015599288,0.00008694748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950707,0.00027511,0.00004742324,0.00007755121,0.00005882032,0.000033943455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00118298,0.0004036604,0.00022714773,0.0007614288,0.002776879,0.004622457,0.0002802123,0.0008488504,0.00604073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021877394,0.000140651,0.00008874094,0.00075265387,0.009682046,0.0028066665,0.0016975721,0.0024054388,0.0017471047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026781901,0.000011263237,0.000115431045,0.000057648933,0.0000018418459,0.00015658997,0.044950772,0.00005459138,0.00035717257,0.9221997,0.010510257,0.021558024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016288925,0.000035324578,0.0007276297,0.00030408116,0.000004624835,0.00029095294,0.020972589,0.0002225081,0.0013438358,0.1084575,0.8676106,0.000014206586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022319336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002839735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00604073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021165805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097226456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02020824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205125088","doi":"10.1080/24740500.2021.1962651","title":"A Qualified Defence of Rationalism: On the Role of the Analogical Imagination in Spinoza","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Philosophical Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Analogical reasoning; Imagination; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Analogy","score_opus":0.09272277627373084,"score_gpt":0.2813563435251592,"score_spread":0.18863356725142838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205125088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03718191,0.016676798,0.054252364,0.34341925,0.003146022,0.00004921044,0.00007989182,0.00011662789,0.545078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95947707,0.0023425256,0.005645233,0.01661097,0.0016653154,0.000061002953,0.00002474712,0.00007264578,0.014100432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993936,0.003737518,0.00018477025,0.000623997,0.0009877809,0.00052991207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994099,0.003942288,0.00037232888,0.0007026734,0.0006407235,0.00024291921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007667965,0.00045343244,0.0008182785,0.0018907872,0.0051170196,0.009585887,0.0019222301,0.005728815,0.004065525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008333248,0.0002481352,0.00083497894,0.0011942345,0.0641184,0.0098326225,0.0038611786,0.0076252823,0.0006343763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032563366,0.0000018554117,0.000012829804,0.000008592233,9.75967e-7,0.000013590577,0.0009492857,0.000033722634,0.000012370373,0.99785185,0.00057540636,0.00053623517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008143645,0.0000042800734,0.000050578135,0.000040186085,0.0000019918907,0.000025386511,0.00094023894,0.00021263934,0.000041817693,0.9768188,0.021851355,0.0000046429955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006654174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005771079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009585887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058851345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004016326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042699873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206405714","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2021.1979297","title":"The colonial difference in Hugo Grotius: rational man, slavery and Indigenous dispossession","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postcolonial Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions; Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Colonialism; Sovereignty; Indigenous; Historiography; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Law; State (computer science); Mythology; Ideology; Humanism; History; Legal history; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Classics","score_opus":0.04996601099127814,"score_gpt":0.29528800597780946,"score_spread":0.24532199498653132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206405714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53094673,0.015228889,0.0015555619,0.020368917,0.00020667758,0.00002529228,0.000025346659,0.000012872175,0.43162975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906522,0.0011090689,0.00010651879,0.00040405706,0.000028919387,0.0000046033647,0.0000030156743,0.0000075689713,0.007683911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889886,0.0006264462,0.000023012033,0.00009066099,0.0001265289,0.00023448803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994978,0.00032304882,0.0000672856,0.000024672738,0.000032079643,0.000055091055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013518533,0.00012570161,0.00016514071,0.00053413154,0.004688524,0.005094134,0.0004831559,0.0010954608,0.0020728104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015590228,0.000116582014,0.00007702871,0.00082176673,0.034936406,0.0026276319,0.0022233613,0.0013076513,0.00009465874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009902219,0.000008053257,0.000577617,0.000023419572,0.000001916064,0.00033874792,0.2954918,0.000059116137,0.00017358603,0.69826114,0.0013101688,0.003744397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025801224,0.000036327827,0.007078323,0.00030716058,0.00001234735,0.00065305154,0.35306355,0.00040751,0.00059476355,0.18347171,0.45431325,0.00003616705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09487298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14267156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09487298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075173164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030108416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18864149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211384061","doi":"10.7202/1083168ar","title":"“Wise Passiveness”: Wordsworth, Spinoza, and the Ethics of Passivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lumen Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Passivity; Opposition (politics); Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Poetry; Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; Art; Political science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05201913599315245,"score_gpt":0.2679479879063296,"score_spread":0.21592885191317718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211384061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11229124,0.017661054,0.044304755,0.087729484,0.0016870019,0.000051933857,0.000041984465,0.000109687084,0.73612285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96957356,0.0015635277,0.0018455196,0.0025970028,0.00023911594,0.0000371271,0.0000075746616,0.000055972432,0.024080459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969138,0.0020779595,0.00008005676,0.00025166926,0.00040530495,0.0002711588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976077,0.0015733818,0.00023033623,0.0001961808,0.00024868923,0.00014366754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032257468,0.00047703646,0.00031314231,0.0010212424,0.005343717,0.008908874,0.00058563397,0.002360788,0.0025698605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052140527,0.00023449775,0.00021225982,0.0006811448,0.05556727,0.010516466,0.0032856197,0.0034113796,0.0005019009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010396436,0.0000032563805,0.00006969717,0.000018048462,0.0000011138849,0.00004976924,0.017106391,0.00001902344,0.0000716634,0.9786992,0.001503116,0.0024482275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014063541,0.00001987784,0.00021384512,0.0001672981,0.0000062023773,0.00017230412,0.021550816,0.00011335177,0.00040817203,0.78198004,0.19533491,0.000019243931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003961687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041150656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008908874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036385425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024088568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026399553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211552095","doi":"10.1017/hyp.2021.50","title":"Masculine Power? A Gendered Look at the Frontispiece of Hobbes's<i>Leviathan</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Sovereignty; Reading (process); Power (physics); Subject (documents); Prism; Politics; Political philosophy; Facet (psychology); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.03862434674684243,"score_gpt":0.22846164454598614,"score_spread":0.1898372977991437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211552095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1378005,0.010737277,0.004353624,0.029770026,0.00081777485,0.000013962921,0.000034789904,0.000033886416,0.8164382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97315335,0.0012430301,0.00032050736,0.001143592,0.00027297754,0.0000074585737,0.0000072919556,0.000030191186,0.023821633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990221,0.0006417066,0.000010437504,0.000080671045,0.00012835405,0.00011659828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.00033971778,0.000054367778,0.00003205421,0.00005453239,0.000057493133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015118676,0.0002995715,0.00023384356,0.001220858,0.006379295,0.005526203,0.00037448545,0.0012669367,0.0057229623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013357283,0.00013911961,0.00013168338,0.00074782415,0.0291271,0.0032243994,0.0021443304,0.0020955708,0.00049210753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008821023,0.0000055426485,0.00020557872,0.00001635192,0.0000014033831,0.00013457531,0.12450729,0.000021880496,0.00029261404,0.8692152,0.0026043658,0.002986427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011043443,0.000056500943,0.0024515989,0.00043588283,0.0000074935406,0.0004011306,0.2299202,0.00022368156,0.0009186428,0.22838634,0.5371672,0.000020379659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008127518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012201114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008127518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032643836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010237342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02368486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213755443","doi":"10.33137/aestimatio.v2i1.37734","title":"Anonymus Cantabrigiensis: Commentarium in Sophisticos Elenchos Aristotelis edited by Sten Ebbesen","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aestimatio Sources and Studies in the History of Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Value (mathematics); Attribution; Field (mathematics); Library science; Classics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09221008824619414,"score_gpt":0.2903469466743142,"score_spread":0.19813685842812007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213755443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020260414,0.21261656,0.0014644085,0.44047105,0.06511616,0.000044804186,0.0005689348,0.00012718105,0.25933054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39534685,0.083791666,0.001385347,0.052108526,0.05092511,0.00012539324,0.0005010853,0.00065381767,0.4151623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992586,0.0003202192,0.00002481728,0.00013277229,0.00018968181,0.00007395694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887484,0.00070411904,0.000095273565,0.00005251826,0.00022793667,0.00004537549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001091244,0.0005106364,0.0003465637,0.0014957315,0.0053423033,0.0022544265,0.0006947162,0.0022280049,0.013479742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003063714,0.00020757907,0.00014332915,0.0017145086,0.0044975323,0.0019586512,0.002147031,0.0031110442,0.0020877845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059844322,0.0000056344757,0.00032976276,0.00039878226,0.000009890869,0.00040990784,0.02223814,0.000072362345,0.0006028129,0.10805779,0.84246725,0.025347799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000247551,0.000002520919,0.0007971605,0.00026898613,0.0000028608663,0.000080773294,0.0023916285,0.000020586378,0.00009508656,0.0023726681,0.993958,0.0000071709724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030415647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0624979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030415647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017932712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060477257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217799907","doi":"10.7202/1090450ar","title":"La fronde et la crosse. Aspects cynégétiques du débat entre « textualisme » et « contextualisme » en histoire des idées","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cygne noir","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022530726234770784,"score_gpt":0.2760009829114143,"score_spread":0.2534702566766435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217799907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07279191,0.08168756,0.024601437,0.18517432,0.0035462598,0.000100491685,0.00035621008,0.00013163406,0.63161016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8449268,0.010877812,0.0041354885,0.009894467,0.0013411983,0.00016158028,0.00012237346,0.00022231466,0.12831797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702865,0.0016186913,0.00007762955,0.0004721094,0.00045323494,0.00034981387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974179,0.0014801339,0.00026369686,0.0002296244,0.00041456943,0.00019393268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025111553,0.00066733896,0.00036771505,0.0024549458,0.0052579287,0.007487452,0.000999885,0.003108905,0.010765224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007221282,0.0003042418,0.00042153834,0.0015279694,0.02481266,0.00926709,0.003585905,0.004570626,0.0012285472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023098251,0.0000046726523,0.0005433676,0.000098263714,0.0000054826282,0.00008930587,0.02438216,0.000063057356,0.0001953462,0.9614403,0.007935139,0.0052198423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023219529,0.000048554346,0.0045495224,0.00070845964,0.000023294253,0.0002922505,0.032400128,0.00040079118,0.0008673639,0.30916345,0.6514776,0.000045386863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050577696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06391677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050577696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010155043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038064844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100566626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32877705","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2020.110147","title":"La philosophie internationale et les Colloques Castelli","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Niskamoon Corporation","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06835652631512563,"score_gpt":0.26530577364776997,"score_spread":0.19694924733264435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32877705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050283824,0.16711167,0.0038869358,0.1233899,0.01680004,0.000025740539,0.00032883164,0.00013853237,0.68329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3074265,0.1728728,0.009621197,0.022648614,0.036678113,0.0003068997,0.00057242275,0.0006265687,0.4492469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955876,0.002215479,0.00018089949,0.0004912291,0.0010387494,0.00048616726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716955,0.0014524941,0.0002574078,0.00037462043,0.00046839126,0.00027766117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034127077,0.0010108843,0.0007438928,0.0029075202,0.0039244653,0.007079029,0.0008202305,0.002892198,0.02460757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060619474,0.0003925526,0.0005863307,0.0031987894,0.0109548485,0.004098308,0.0031061305,0.0072644386,0.0050977794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002940877,0.00001831365,0.00045217795,0.00013618411,0.00000869849,0.00005448022,0.002426469,0.00012389339,0.0001560763,0.8620785,0.09232728,0.04218861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004029218,0.0000046646187,0.00059949124,0.00011592733,0.0000016965801,0.0000743535,0.000345332,0.000054521217,0.000040605464,0.019552853,0.97919923,0.0000073426904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025530793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020583695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025530793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010034529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046636174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08232051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33401710","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines9010027","title":"Santé du corps et santé de l’esprit : les apports de l'éthique de Spinoza à l'éthique médicale","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Biomedicines","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02405082708446381,"score_gpt":0.2948944385821235,"score_spread":0.2708436114976597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33401710","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047471512,0.49345344,0.0052519473,0.28872734,0.009866813,0.0000751553,0.00076276454,0.0002468712,0.15414405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3276554,0.39929384,0.013798703,0.04337143,0.008761681,0.00013503329,0.0009925658,0.00020746938,0.2057839],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901533,0.00032291134,0.000065639964,0.00013620984,0.00029646285,0.00016348268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986155,0.00033694075,0.00016998881,0.00008614967,0.00034439762,0.000447023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002437361,0.00038527386,0.00036898075,0.0005545457,0.0007596206,0.002175992,0.00045296588,0.0021541365,0.030215908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022820516,0.00012697498,0.00029045367,0.0005949484,0.0015352607,0.0015693562,0.00181871,0.0023639614,0.0047674715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053153705,0.0001515827,0.013491154,0.0015257719,0.000090617206,0.0016349354,0.0018139574,0.0003226177,0.0139331715,0.08361163,0.14821637,0.7346767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037101156,0.00017441221,0.015879136,0.0006407782,0.000016773913,0.0012351641,0.00079759443,0.000107948545,0.00085406424,0.0035050928,0.97673166,0.000020339705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005623358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063239457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030215908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002191932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031863295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101082325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37298298","doi":"10.3390/ijms24119346","title":"A etica do individuo em Hobbes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dissertatio","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Michelson Prize and Grants","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028862895747653505,"score_gpt":0.25638887213311085,"score_spread":0.22752597638545735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37298298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7659304,0.00958713,0.002544893,0.002791113,0.0005178833,0.000050397244,0.00079893554,0.00011726933,0.21766198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93017185,0.0055851727,0.0028991178,0.00038147837,0.00012969176,0.000052651973,0.0003150826,0.000044187764,0.06042059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995851,0.00013185792,0.000013908686,0.000095540556,0.00009568207,0.00007791995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976045,0.00004716223,0.000058242913,0.000032008822,0.000041266,0.000060911978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005514396,0.00028261926,0.0002632441,0.0007816785,0.0018262983,0.0011534146,0.00024219128,0.00049308746,0.00910228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008415567,0.00010262345,0.00015045863,0.0004225635,0.0010345939,0.00042960982,0.001326434,0.00042016568,0.0020561148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005025746,0.0003240561,0.1418496,0.00062664883,0.00007647166,0.0066677863,0.04645885,0.00031576122,0.028634463,0.08664549,0.016311163,0.6715871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012401154,0.00019401037,0.16693328,0.00039266743,0.000043626136,0.005693919,0.019114492,0.00028133928,0.0056669977,0.005223083,0.79640925,0.00003489921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008463271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020200593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00910228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010586441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056929275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030450165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200227710","doi":"10.1017/s0008423921000895","title":"The Role of Women in Hobbes's Economic Thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Relation (database); Creatures; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Politics; Historical materialism; Frame (networking); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Economics; Law; Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018693607633460355,"score_gpt":0.2327785102121307,"score_spread":0.21408490257867036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200227710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07434648,0.012906661,0.00976523,0.072634116,0.0013452776,0.00003335349,0.000039492494,0.000021529704,0.8289079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638162,0.0022107568,0.0010928891,0.003621998,0.0005913141,0.00003819599,0.00000879164,0.00003437457,0.028585387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951697,0.0034216067,0.000057775113,0.00030465345,0.00051999785,0.00052629557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756515,0.0017212206,0.00014707581,0.00011464111,0.0001956226,0.00025628152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071279015,0.0004798966,0.00046583256,0.0021524378,0.010407135,0.010783637,0.0006888578,0.0025767083,0.0039453376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004145409,0.00028100796,0.00028507048,0.0011810912,0.05877935,0.0058738245,0.0035710062,0.0028692998,0.00043277483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078618805,0.0000043548634,0.00011197107,0.000008375428,0.0000012256473,0.000036026617,0.018437233,0.000031284137,0.000037178866,0.9791743,0.0009886206,0.0011615872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016604654,0.000028354558,0.00078074523,0.00022651577,0.0000076223027,0.000102348225,0.034846187,0.00038464958,0.00023978774,0.6489248,0.31442004,0.000022256809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113992365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011248293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113992365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011354523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002825692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082383215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200453423","doi":"10.1017/9781108906999.004","title":"The Transcendental Spinozism of the<i>Wissenschaftslehre</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Existentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Intelligibility (philosophy); Trope (literature); Transcendental number; Realism","score_opus":0.035986356484604284,"score_gpt":0.1911893291665237,"score_spread":0.1552029726819194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200453423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005611948,0.015310606,0.0114087835,0.020500896,0.00084143755,0.000011629924,0.00005341567,0.00008693518,0.94617426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6385974,0.011355635,0.0060619693,0.0071559623,0.0012279692,0.000086097534,0.00009455388,0.00018767842,0.33523273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871147,0.0005069181,0.000031944604,0.00018743971,0.0003618968,0.00020036468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994135,0.00029845847,0.000049594346,0.00010263073,0.00008267557,0.000053194988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013224247,0.0005056913,0.00028991917,0.0012405389,0.0037802677,0.0072656246,0.00069537293,0.0017599268,0.0055048005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016272282,0.00022802547,0.0003304588,0.00093870127,0.029551826,0.005684802,0.0020520915,0.0050548995,0.001719829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018844552,0.0000012473223,0.00000961562,0.000008757686,4.828533e-7,0.0000082696015,0.00083243055,0.00002252806,0.000025961855,0.9948991,0.0026967241,0.0014929199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004567414,0.000007982907,0.00013983507,0.00009215021,0.0000019726526,0.00007966369,0.0009039153,0.00015932714,0.00020654856,0.64024776,0.35814938,0.0000068673967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066934023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00916954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007413516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007413516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037051488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05378914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205699477","doi":"10.4000/books.psorbonne.89990","title":"La générosité comme liberté dans l’Éthique de Spinoza","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.045826512930416695,"score_gpt":0.256983554919073,"score_spread":0.21115704198865629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205699477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060121417,0.009579928,0.020460488,0.027803492,0.0005596714,0.000037892125,0.000061970895,0.000052361294,0.88132274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286635,0.0033292207,0.0038733531,0.0023471857,0.0002625997,0.00006630651,0.000035529552,0.000045272125,0.061377067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824214,0.0008677257,0.000045944947,0.0001876712,0.0003044081,0.00035209666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991443,0.00044671516,0.00008519832,0.00014084898,0.0000961136,0.00008677271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024086826,0.00038513963,0.00042496604,0.0009220915,0.0042126547,0.0067153196,0.00048442153,0.0014868822,0.0065734596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018943218,0.00018486562,0.00041490246,0.000841349,0.028217796,0.005487208,0.0036238334,0.0034424246,0.0006014451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043422833,0.0000023344444,0.00006943753,0.00000838867,7.8933743e-7,0.000013386175,0.0013127922,0.000023613688,0.000033231,0.9963947,0.00039239856,0.0017446298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011002343,0.000017637569,0.0006831778,0.000119700075,0.0000073771757,0.00011269354,0.004103941,0.00018139617,0.00018002589,0.87245184,0.12211879,0.00001223485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006413188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008586975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067153196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004356626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037758169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031609654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210906703","doi":"10.1177/1468796802002002664","title":"Review Symposium","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.11345935310389148,"score_gpt":0.2638607718730263,"score_spread":0.15040141876913482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210906703","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043442872,0.72214156,0.00063255464,0.042806588,0.08433177,0.00014208184,0.0019959274,0.0003502594,0.14716482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004428543,0.49897584,0.0008014668,0.032513466,0.04529389,0.000251566,0.0030277865,0.00013700669,0.41457048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950373,0.00008833029,0.00003358307,0.00008336228,0.00021749079,0.000073504336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918956,0.00009761399,0.00008434601,0.00006287029,0.00034901252,0.00021657995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007937435,0.0010182555,0.001182882,0.002485593,0.00083260174,0.0030601623,0.0013411205,0.0027884634,0.22095487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002000839,0.00040114016,0.0007373211,0.0023318988,0.00042832195,0.0020367343,0.0020784272,0.0021508858,0.12960437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000412991,0.000013806487,0.000036853835,0.00095510844,0.000014330333,0.000020728621,0.000013117876,0.000015708429,0.00023376656,0.0011271617,0.9137067,0.08382153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006984509,0.000008947767,0.00013285394,0.00038786125,0.000011120075,0.000026628373,0.000015328838,0.000003786653,0.000031284733,0.0003920616,0.99898094,0.000002014879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001810803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004675552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22095487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015148254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030775093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7391677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211133987","doi":"10.1017/9781108906999","title":"Hegel and the Challenge of Spinoza","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Metaphysics; German idealism; Monism; Philosophy; Idealism; Epistemology","score_opus":0.041318275807784,"score_gpt":0.19890978410814347,"score_spread":0.15759150830035948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211133987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025838405,0.020301769,0.0030287756,0.06136645,0.00086704775,0.000014393263,0.000025113835,0.000048437185,0.88850963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83023185,0.007026293,0.0011878663,0.008258596,0.000503182,0.0000413683,0.000024698302,0.00006307775,0.15266302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982022,0.00088836683,0.000029335331,0.00012694026,0.00042249224,0.00033052173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911255,0.00050195755,0.00005395546,0.000087237255,0.00013741701,0.00010687747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016921745,0.0003654771,0.0004073152,0.00089525385,0.0066763046,0.0077714124,0.00047957717,0.002399278,0.0037779843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020368136,0.00021389306,0.00023650873,0.00091078255,0.035245437,0.0063734883,0.0032790645,0.0052681686,0.0007519442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049413106,0.0000033227018,0.000023160112,0.000008251127,9.28127e-7,0.000017939794,0.0019873797,0.00003520476,0.00002278809,0.9932428,0.0030156255,0.0016375943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010615738,0.000008033785,0.00013570195,0.000076200115,0.000002996683,0.00006812339,0.0051445975,0.00013381307,0.00013988386,0.7972275,0.19704461,0.000007911149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008936127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0144220255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010293585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010293585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006696739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07468557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211165779","doi":"10.1017/9781108778879.001","title":"Introduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Social contract; Natural (archaeology); Politics; State (computer science); Natural law; State of nature; Sociology; Law; History; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.045650212236697005,"score_gpt":0.19131806898602613,"score_spread":0.14566785674932914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211165779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006053293,0.007324199,0.0011582848,0.00483943,0.0035688658,0.000040843,0.0007909754,0.00014963916,0.98152256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059981556,0.0047633876,0.00077614986,0.0021446245,0.0011657135,0.000043569275,0.0006595401,0.00013985315,0.984309],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993585,0.00009681421,0.000023766874,0.00016809795,0.0002682332,0.00008468197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994979,0.00011923378,0.000029530276,0.00005941225,0.00018697826,0.00010699968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005277857,0.0006151373,0.00039668052,0.0013133278,0.0022318785,0.0052336925,0.0010243962,0.0019420654,0.31648272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016575388,0.0002341336,0.00028366206,0.0014516762,0.0014263985,0.0037635716,0.002444333,0.0020678057,0.1619226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027333865,0.000027622984,0.00021803546,0.00021748035,0.000002343019,0.00010278689,0.001319401,0.000058360805,0.00025021072,0.22981712,0.6734698,0.094489604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.4819225e-7,0.0000024456065,0.00007449018,0.00005910922,2.9863676e-7,0.000035561836,0.00011074379,0.0000055100763,0.00002198499,0.0029676384,0.9967205,0.0000011484877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039501167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006420989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6835173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021655178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017436433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213209159","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197577264.001.0001","title":"Recasting Hume and Early Modern Philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07787960757916802,"score_gpt":0.23448879858188373,"score_spread":0.1566091910027157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213209159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011512942,0.06495729,0.005178043,0.05605796,0.0035503258,0.000014074943,0.00005287548,0.0000721616,0.8586043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5340607,0.027228924,0.0029672468,0.012708195,0.0041576265,0.000038869708,0.000075706725,0.00011506098,0.4186476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857974,0.0009303729,0.000017315582,0.00007631007,0.00029731102,0.00009895545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889153,0.00072583515,0.00005132602,0.000063087005,0.00019779388,0.00007047004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001349609,0.0003098356,0.00027013564,0.001603825,0.0029161132,0.0046072993,0.00039513272,0.0013476735,0.0053146044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017356614,0.00011575642,0.00013207094,0.0010684528,0.0160357,0.00397837,0.0016280372,0.0031195693,0.0008513178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000077320465,0.0000072440366,0.000071505754,0.000040414012,0.0000020534833,0.00004998371,0.0067609,0.00007607706,0.0000637799,0.9548357,0.028030876,0.01005373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035192622,0.0000072582156,0.0001969137,0.00018881372,0.0000018349193,0.00008287076,0.0028687865,0.00012150374,0.00011234366,0.30047855,0.69593185,0.000005677578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042647924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008876678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053146044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045534153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019754816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033037543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214834851","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139137034","title":"Hobbes and the Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Scholarship; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03812495127859025,"score_gpt":0.19070429638764935,"score_spread":0.1525793451090591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214834851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004711455,0.087776154,0.003230796,0.024792388,0.002476254,0.000019818854,0.000053111093,0.000037514073,0.8769026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33183494,0.06043734,0.0038223355,0.010917441,0.0054854397,0.00013930479,0.000086469016,0.00015333557,0.5871234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892706,0.00049107557,0.00003176771,0.00012300668,0.00029341143,0.00013360899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992636,0.00047635695,0.000039042177,0.00006303327,0.00008477306,0.000073123636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010672072,0.00043566278,0.0003364051,0.0014245918,0.0051030763,0.0058392747,0.00044526745,0.002135406,0.007969607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022916258,0.00022122078,0.0002290662,0.0010960439,0.020367948,0.0041448125,0.0017419395,0.0032354863,0.0023711687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004743526,0.0000054054226,0.00002945821,0.000032228672,0.0000011388122,0.000030209008,0.0028961457,0.000054154356,0.000055044104,0.971321,0.018393194,0.0071772155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038131484,0.0000071071518,0.00020462176,0.00022639867,0.000001665236,0.000057973833,0.0014127063,0.00008481283,0.000071653085,0.33869585,0.659228,0.00000541104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005122533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065871724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007969607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048252936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002457646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0350101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220688983","doi":"10.1163/18750257-bja10037","title":"Hobbes Reenvisions Hebraic and Christian History","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hobbes Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Intellectual history; Eschatology; Sovereignty; Politics; History of religions; Monarchy; Predestination; Theology; New Testament; Old Testament; Literature; History; Law; Art","score_opus":0.14732684142912775,"score_gpt":0.269738447787569,"score_spread":0.12241160635844126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220688983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14108552,0.016473524,0.004352499,0.02105495,0.0009286241,0.000014400203,0.00003129997,0.0000406701,0.8160186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792429,0.001496946,0.0003162029,0.00078384404,0.000261235,0.0000062224362,0.0000068786553,0.000018326502,0.017867306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840873,0.0010964704,0.000021538994,0.00010113515,0.00021749716,0.00015466794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897134,0.00063277065,0.00008233668,0.00010705341,0.00011072344,0.00009580588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019138705,0.00024688424,0.00022753095,0.0013429002,0.005526465,0.0051151416,0.0004207567,0.0013871824,0.0037881848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021729637,0.00013279643,0.00009129956,0.0007239887,0.032592874,0.0027376085,0.002450918,0.0026666727,0.00041465354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013869952,0.0000077676,0.00013541245,0.000013782071,0.0000017409885,0.000059718728,0.02283994,0.000056276527,0.000116610674,0.97311723,0.0015204687,0.0021171945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013851934,0.000035548754,0.0013164296,0.0003561063,0.000006211373,0.00014875442,0.03692626,0.00025477866,0.0007180316,0.48595974,0.4742461,0.00001816025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00414348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076444126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005526465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004153472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030135691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225396521","doi":"10.5325/jhistrhetoric.25.1.0098","title":"Democracy as Fetish, by Ralph Cintron, University Park: Penn State University Press","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Rhetoric","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Hegemony; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Liberal democracy; End of history; Hegelianism; Law; Media studies; Political economy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03523233007786373,"score_gpt":0.210550944554872,"score_spread":0.17531861447700828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225396521","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015843762,0.43174365,0.0013311511,0.24780127,0.009875984,0.000027515121,0.00020517109,0.00011983125,0.30731106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10809399,0.25245884,0.0015971254,0.07860848,0.010882209,0.00023172543,0.00028467388,0.00030184095,0.54754114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988387,0.00046091617,0.000057416266,0.00018348951,0.0003265746,0.00013293655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904424,0.0005398721,0.0000841232,0.00008101538,0.00011460543,0.00013620405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015011758,0.0010780821,0.00044511806,0.0010938889,0.004718172,0.010345065,0.0010161593,0.0050130305,0.012772415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003866229,0.00080052204,0.0002927481,0.002410497,0.008122998,0.013936131,0.0032188883,0.008013199,0.006063028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021298209,0.000027610862,0.00017239239,0.00015181313,0.0000050857016,0.00010408512,0.0050905277,0.0001145347,0.0000742961,0.2646482,0.68767476,0.0419154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048964407,0.0000030366994,0.00025884897,0.00026558526,0.000001463391,0.000064559805,0.0010707164,0.00003237676,0.000028030357,0.02269592,0.9755701,0.0000044506564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016052494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040230714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016052494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00436966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006271697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042727947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225697747","doi":"10.34699/rido.2022.7","title":"Repenser le rapport salarial comme captation de puissance grâce à Spinoza","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.058119260080146944,"score_gpt":0.2530459841281967,"score_spread":0.19492672404804973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225697747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027326949,0.005746572,0.0077962764,0.14916013,0.008963289,0.000038269667,0.00007542168,0.00015140335,0.80074173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5654227,0.0013207259,0.0017172535,0.008687422,0.001492562,0.000054514014,0.000031326148,0.00022144685,0.421052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971649,0.0012482046,0.000052291034,0.0002950956,0.0005631942,0.0006762631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981534,0.0006594408,0.00011463107,0.00024518286,0.00046972008,0.0003575615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035891489,0.00045141214,0.0004066665,0.00068680965,0.0103097055,0.008217466,0.0007445027,0.0032518606,0.017182102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006156498,0.00019965487,0.0003823167,0.00052065897,0.009609797,0.0036023003,0.0042862906,0.007011965,0.0031478535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003465192,0.000010632868,0.00011581359,0.000020219575,0.00000366729,0.000069449365,0.005700814,0.00006113871,0.00012697007,0.9641466,0.02307081,0.0066391765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016888434,0.00001705204,0.000620751,0.00009167642,0.0000092931805,0.00009226768,0.0053192503,0.0002647117,0.00031006604,0.09556787,0.89767206,0.000018105951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019241752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023801342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019241752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008838874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046826783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06413084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230886526","doi":"10.1177/1474885117718371","title":"Contra politanism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Teleology; Personhood; Sovereignty; Politics; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); State of nature; Sociology; Social contract; Moral agency; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06216706977571082,"score_gpt":0.27363641230366903,"score_spread":0.2114693425279582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230886526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052727773,0.0035986407,0.020605156,0.06646848,0.001843163,0.000027919721,0.00017129215,0.00013104724,0.90188146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6432551,0.0036542725,0.010372976,0.045859706,0.004415107,0.00033918643,0.00033050863,0.00045842407,0.29131475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966106,0.0013062429,0.00007947262,0.0010554998,0.00054041407,0.00040777016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858296,0.00051195256,0.00014703335,0.0004155099,0.00023653173,0.00010598823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030277674,0.0006530437,0.0005231171,0.0011758202,0.0038104772,0.0065458203,0.0010252675,0.0030098052,0.018131888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046764305,0.00021136033,0.0006156053,0.00080560404,0.021202026,0.008168544,0.0047948505,0.008384877,0.003723051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021854562,0.0000015495299,0.000032456875,0.000007829563,0.0000016189175,0.000006050517,0.00031486183,0.000023478733,0.000009660183,0.9962637,0.002296407,0.0010402155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008264417,0.000008370995,0.000121645615,0.00007178296,0.000004600302,0.000053198964,0.00068974396,0.00016502138,0.000085772226,0.7445607,0.25422603,0.0000048567326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039385003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004674848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018131888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003908573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023164703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060657203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231391498","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0340","title":"Baruch Spinoza","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Enlightenment; Toleration; Secularization; Politics; Subject (documents); Natural philosophy; Political philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Law; History; Theology","score_opus":0.04653058455976685,"score_gpt":0.2564367321713969,"score_spread":0.20990614761163004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231391498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043098144,0.080208056,0.0055145263,0.09214297,0.026999151,0.000051462834,0.00055121444,0.00054580695,0.789677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08861442,0.029502062,0.004267257,0.026031818,0.0054829,0.00010269737,0.00034535443,0.00063638703,0.8450171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882144,0.00022519885,0.00005691741,0.0003971633,0.00033933582,0.00015997523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935466,0.00017430563,0.00007002415,0.00005897631,0.00020433661,0.00013771339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007291092,0.00078082795,0.0005660977,0.0018442641,0.007901615,0.008308644,0.0008249879,0.0032736142,0.07011957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027807876,0.00034469558,0.00034767363,0.002061256,0.0049968404,0.005420685,0.0037152483,0.005967005,0.03650381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006303983,0.00002051123,0.0003128772,0.00019542903,0.000004704065,0.00020512356,0.0018921385,0.00006768858,0.00019336409,0.55293894,0.36583716,0.078269064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017078478,0.000004112015,0.00011166626,0.00009162975,0.0000017414242,0.000092098446,0.00017926551,0.000029466317,0.00006788874,0.0106295515,0.9887841,0.000006831932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010331994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014781658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07011957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038604417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031830524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2345733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232665384","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_191-1","title":"Human Dignity in Renaissance Philosophy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; The Renaissance; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Art history; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10549832685543652,"score_gpt":0.2703037720847151,"score_spread":0.1648054452292786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232665384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016006008,0.030856565,0.0023397442,0.018837564,0.0013013505,0.00002456432,0.000021096712,0.000021912729,0.9305911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67858756,0.011542831,0.00082142727,0.005409067,0.0013528491,0.00006349214,0.000020520714,0.000054796525,0.3021474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865806,0.00071818655,0.00003181011,0.00013360563,0.00023957585,0.00021878319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994128,0.0003187761,0.00003276884,0.000067144436,0.00008910883,0.00007942444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025108685,0.00050015515,0.00038339593,0.0008785014,0.006209835,0.0054410193,0.0007126891,0.0028438699,0.007349562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021936889,0.00021281347,0.00019508007,0.0009600982,0.041371763,0.0050025242,0.0033329893,0.005651091,0.0009177191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028153343,0.0000043444693,0.00001622132,0.000010491936,8.085784e-7,0.000012870569,0.0034843755,0.000027564412,0.000013903468,0.99255145,0.001578801,0.0022962813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011283686,0.000015299096,0.00023304333,0.00013459861,0.0000032335179,0.000055836546,0.0022978869,0.000054747168,0.00008071924,0.6834137,0.3136928,0.0000068290697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132651655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020685581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132651655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010362239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056447927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07518363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232823581","doi":"10.2990/28_2_84","title":"Impassioned politics: New research on the role of emotions in political life - Marlene Sokolon, Political Emotions: Aristotle and the Symphony of Reason and Emotion (New York: Northern Illinois University Press, 2006), 217 pages. ISBN 978-0875803616. Hardcover, $38.00. - Rebecca Kingston and Leonard Ferry, ed., Bringing the Passions Back In (Vancouver Canada: University of British Colombia Press, 2008), 268 pages. ISBN 978-0774814102. Paperback, $34.95. - Drew Westen, The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation, (New York: Public Affairs, 2008), 475 pages. ISBN 978-1586485733. Paperback, $15.95.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics and the Life Sciences","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Symphony; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Art history; Art; Law","score_opus":0.045355460910702486,"score_gpt":0.22819395747414462,"score_spread":0.18283849656344214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232823581","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056161378,0.79000646,0.0041107805,0.068073876,0.0019622243,0.000027160455,0.000052902877,0.00003663556,0.13011381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21979482,0.7011861,0.0039011287,0.023674019,0.004089502,0.00016943742,0.00010454438,0.00009440161,0.04698602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887615,0.0006350532,0.000030436117,0.00012545916,0.00025035554,0.00008248759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845195,0.0011479863,0.0001117488,0.00005347911,0.00011828672,0.00011646885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019632548,0.000983715,0.0008177267,0.002470037,0.0025094647,0.008370751,0.0007989511,0.0031143157,0.007753218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002260784,0.0003608423,0.00048495768,0.0029368193,0.014362692,0.011782939,0.0030831292,0.005027457,0.0015975024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007163389,0.00009292757,0.0015026203,0.0018482616,0.00004319539,0.000313224,0.047642685,0.00021616786,0.00061437045,0.61251396,0.16862273,0.1665182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020039137,0.00004012174,0.0065252767,0.0032819007,0.0000232871,0.00080912025,0.033995405,0.00017118812,0.00026969786,0.4275255,0.5272994,0.000039074726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002300859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051271524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008370751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036259226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026018398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02630806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234369043","doi":"10.3138/9781442619890-fm","title":"Frontmatter","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"ECW Press (Canada); Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04959589808041068,"score_gpt":0.20809872382097921,"score_spread":0.15850282574056854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234369043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000293794,0.0011157369,0.00038071617,0.0010426177,0.000969566,0.000010177702,0.00028697183,0.0002761537,0.99562424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012680818,0.00031019928,0.000107070504,0.00023636938,0.00010703814,0.0000043032082,0.00008949659,0.000108319604,0.9977691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997831,0.000023276694,0.0000076725455,0.000063509346,0.000087646586,0.00003486769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972516,0.000056071895,0.000014228177,0.000045556397,0.000089549496,0.00006945303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019403805,0.00049036427,0.0003375959,0.001036487,0.0019488382,0.004003572,0.00062581804,0.0015147539,0.7052787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008903705,0.00023114451,0.0002573929,0.0010160073,0.00069519965,0.0034145163,0.0022094976,0.0014975315,0.47222146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021451697,0.000013161722,0.000112784866,0.00008913148,0.0000014327293,0.00008425345,0.00042972248,0.000032972137,0.00028162746,0.05082311,0.8435855,0.10452485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001064566,0.000001990765,0.00005746815,0.000024948045,2.91004e-7,0.00003332666,0.0000475965,0.000011600048,0.00003056879,0.000922687,0.9988675,9.365627e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002225188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009135611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2947213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010101675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073347084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42038417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235013541","doi":"10.1080/03085140303133","title":"Diverse enlightenments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economy and Society","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Metaphysics; Transcendental number; Philosophy; German; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03712897624515784,"score_gpt":0.21769234518611744,"score_spread":0.1805633689409596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235013541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09313158,0.006793337,0.0053710225,0.024773052,0.00064333936,0.00007177719,0.000090025416,0.00005337732,0.86907256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88893723,0.002028043,0.001655421,0.005281901,0.00027901217,0.000072141025,0.000099166384,0.000055672685,0.10159143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915531,0.0034364236,0.0002450359,0.0010055136,0.0015061933,0.0022538048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966354,0.00078258244,0.00028430455,0.0004092018,0.0006599068,0.0012287176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072207456,0.0004913805,0.0004487286,0.0024996437,0.0119964825,0.01680854,0.0013160349,0.0029144068,0.008930933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009403773,0.00028671135,0.00044157484,0.002431284,0.014011741,0.010495874,0.01708559,0.0049193725,0.0015336922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024709916,0.000023389188,0.00046108608,0.000026277416,0.000006213082,0.00011026319,0.020991849,0.00006626573,0.00009172962,0.95989656,0.004249029,0.014052646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026050666,0.000057594105,0.0020720623,0.00027973123,0.000013181957,0.0002060448,0.043879915,0.00020286489,0.00037395995,0.2900499,0.6628081,0.000030672476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002745121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005005093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01680854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008258313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003718796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059918523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237979863","doi":"10.1163/20512996-12340075","title":"Recollecting Athens","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polis The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Contextualism; Relation (database); Politics; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Focus (optics); Sociology; Ancient Greek; Philosophy; History; Classics; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06341342900210875,"score_gpt":0.28297159990533294,"score_spread":0.2195581709032242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237979863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23781203,0.032837894,0.0071740495,0.03984654,0.005045163,0.000038440237,0.00012973098,0.00012281442,0.67699337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478152,0.004889675,0.0017299326,0.0048040533,0.0011620045,0.000025797362,0.000055705248,0.00009933185,0.039418403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981719,0.001100091,0.00007393882,0.00026783784,0.00022909995,0.00015716885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998868,0.00071137265,0.00010078567,0.00014354453,0.0001145827,0.00006181969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00189133,0.00048577428,0.0003609572,0.0022217752,0.005097213,0.0052705756,0.00045288558,0.0017927455,0.0042549144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003797833,0.00017229895,0.00019657586,0.0014748998,0.019399064,0.0066753686,0.004631907,0.0031876825,0.0007540301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016937656,0.000008239811,0.0005450033,0.00012913176,0.0000060161874,0.00036528916,0.2033218,0.00006307891,0.00033777923,0.77098405,0.007495529,0.016727148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038683256,0.000018017932,0.0013799311,0.00045867058,0.0000069668063,0.0006906041,0.080384925,0.00014171295,0.0005031679,0.16408136,0.75231266,0.000018213083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017692307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003948956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052705756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027548072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009954063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019987643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239793115","doi":"10.3138/cras.38.1.147","title":"Leo Strauss and Resourceful Odysseus: Rhetorical Violence and the Holy Middle","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Liberalism; Politics; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Literature; Political philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); History; Epistemology; Law; Art; Theology; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.10087696311942382,"score_gpt":0.2835550663769433,"score_spread":0.18267810325751946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239793115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08789373,0.066389345,0.0044946,0.4029192,0.0024810368,0.00002305293,0.000030354191,0.000058661597,0.43570995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97053266,0.0062257834,0.00053469924,0.012269265,0.00054722844,0.000017775015,0.0000060950592,0.000027387869,0.0098391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927724,0.005120503,0.000101917445,0.00034709764,0.0011248821,0.00053325755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239457,0.005838352,0.00039761132,0.00026672147,0.0007845475,0.00031817853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065770326,0.00032898327,0.0004161631,0.0028334148,0.011043877,0.008197709,0.0008527137,0.0029243506,0.0018958921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010670386,0.00016777875,0.00017870955,0.0019790404,0.05425605,0.0066878125,0.0045946157,0.004903465,0.00026484695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006051818,0.0000038055664,0.00008634206,0.000023742752,0.0000015583229,0.000039641152,0.024718525,0.000032323725,0.000026454387,0.966223,0.005991455,0.0028471665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013539597,0.000016122183,0.0004916963,0.00064662565,0.0000087377775,0.00011254031,0.054550014,0.00021858119,0.00027185676,0.51828,0.42537132,0.000018826879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035497382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04144075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035497382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013683581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009852154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09928179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240929778","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom110116","title":"Authority","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.031864344527523986,"score_gpt":0.2486904842154223,"score_spread":0.21682613968789832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240929778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016177472,0.0006199516,0.009354489,0.004223646,0.00030495695,0.000042725125,0.00012771628,0.0000749286,0.98363394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4682031,0.002290592,0.005497203,0.0021522143,0.0011522857,0.0001807739,0.00043538242,0.00016851892,0.5199199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995652,0.001365586,0.00020694526,0.0008852264,0.0014797745,0.00041044896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628687,0.0010845114,0.00028349538,0.0008103041,0.0011509892,0.00038384768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024349678,0.00045593656,0.0004912358,0.0016797314,0.0028402037,0.0094586415,0.0010681876,0.0020058048,0.08710306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008426788,0.00022427285,0.0003528185,0.0017680494,0.008833546,0.006017481,0.0032729018,0.0021357709,0.016083984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030901147,0.0000023283005,0.000047638616,0.000017588709,0.0000013568117,0.000019551893,0.0003317681,0.00006209693,0.00003666945,0.9865579,0.008062488,0.004857515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009557355,0.000011303689,0.00018022815,0.00016793328,0.000006052264,0.000100855585,0.00051433966,0.00039600066,0.00015322307,0.5533994,0.44505262,0.00000849432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025866528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022036962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08710306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036609457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038426607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241424073","doi":"10.1002/9781444397161.ch7","title":"Conceiving","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Philosophy; Classics; History; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0812120374447119,"score_gpt":0.23344664750928365,"score_spread":0.15223461006457176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241424073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031934872,0.00039956658,0.019164182,0.008952014,0.00025171644,0.00002768481,0.00007074845,0.00006845146,0.96787214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41826046,0.0007865724,0.012766905,0.0044725193,0.00042340677,0.00018128089,0.00018643308,0.00020699465,0.5627155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986933,0.0006876165,0.00002958766,0.00027249774,0.00020531972,0.00011158995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998961,0.00040463352,0.00006637774,0.00027607114,0.00017147728,0.0001205587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022868076,0.00056559907,0.00020130645,0.0008861742,0.0033345462,0.007994568,0.0012771022,0.0024058633,0.06449081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038623947,0.0001822378,0.00029283488,0.00070947263,0.012180809,0.008307867,0.0024020942,0.0032682647,0.0062664747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.553376e-7,0.0000020203368,0.000019530591,0.0000027331193,3.5204548e-7,0.00000382084,0.00039615133,0.00001763525,0.000008398345,0.9960342,0.002123424,0.0013908116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007113788,0.0000032984276,0.0000783958,0.000034941004,0.0000021130138,0.00003327998,0.0013594681,0.0003340563,0.000075460695,0.8553731,0.14269513,0.0000036636388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046606986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006836395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06449081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003050695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032117164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242096098","doi":"10.4000/rsa.827","title":"Joas Hans, Knöbl Wolfgang, War in Social Thought. Hobbes to the Present","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.25258817251484916,"score_gpt":0.42428065515327545,"score_spread":0.1716924826384263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242096098","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021390705,0.6887176,0.00070265797,0.2509244,0.008695496,0.000009990878,0.0000847921,0.000021862203,0.048704013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18292792,0.54849356,0.0016453769,0.06755665,0.017652554,0.000094804614,0.000117100906,0.00015185766,0.1813602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920624,0.00043711672,0.00002488884,0.00012591016,0.00012942431,0.00007632752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990729,0.0006154237,0.000074826945,0.000046514044,0.00008791135,0.00010248486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012118125,0.00076148944,0.0004589061,0.0012631292,0.004519552,0.0036826583,0.00057207857,0.004176527,0.008044553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002396505,0.00045795957,0.00019762904,0.0020080637,0.0099778455,0.0062910705,0.0016907798,0.003650403,0.002478691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004900347,0.000036429174,0.0002867949,0.00035556155,0.000012111536,0.000119083496,0.015429718,0.00012858154,0.00013896763,0.56197023,0.3934873,0.027986273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014421042,0.00000842782,0.0007930137,0.00063767825,0.000007780096,0.00009308843,0.006949378,0.0000418735,0.00009343984,0.17579858,0.8155459,0.000016525988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024783041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039563004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024783041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037974995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024148365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049277604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248963546","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_35","title":"Joy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.15500353095470262,"score_gpt":0.27042006209212327,"score_spread":0.11541653113742065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248963546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037075946,0.0008051914,0.0007023969,0.002406834,0.0013897343,0.000019044934,0.00020426825,0.00025659197,0.99384516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019906147,0.00033189348,0.00016366536,0.0007393682,0.000106963016,0.000010125824,0.00006099,0.000098892364,0.9964976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958295,0.000051299816,0.000008530464,0.00006615299,0.00019760036,0.00009351194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996489,0.000038629383,0.00001174449,0.00004185692,0.00011429332,0.00014450165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040006055,0.00069776905,0.00040844321,0.0011882591,0.0028486594,0.0047534197,0.00096776016,0.0010367117,0.5785251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012676584,0.0002514849,0.00033274284,0.00078844733,0.0010573056,0.003344156,0.0036922425,0.0026882128,0.34952784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002833628,0.000028003296,0.00011661343,0.000054286684,0.0000024292576,0.00008513553,0.00047370966,0.000048471073,0.0002638698,0.098284565,0.78802943,0.11258525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012164404,0.0000020206573,0.000049629776,0.000014934767,4.6319232e-7,0.000031227995,0.00014259452,0.000011354525,0.00005161743,0.00253306,0.99715984,0.0000019972417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005989413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014693094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5785251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015554857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014430418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249440594","doi":"10.7202/012966ar","title":"Jean-Louis Fournel, Jean Claude Zancarini, La politique de l’expérience. Savonarole, Guicciardini et le républicanisme florentin, Turin, Edizioni dell’Orso, 2002, 386 pages. Marie Gaille-Nikodimov, Conflit civil et liberté. La politique machiavélienne entre histoire et médecine, Paris, Honoré Champion, 2004. Machiavel, Discours sur la première décade de Tite-Live, nouvelle traduction d’Alessandro Fontana et Xavier Tabet, préface d’Alessandro Fontana, Paris, Gallimard, collection « Bibliothèque de Philosophie », 2004, 575 pages.","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Champion; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029425720666728383,"score_gpt":0.2604969081123447,"score_spread":0.23107118744561633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249440594","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087146164,0.8403243,0.00094036653,0.05516049,0.003941505,0.000026110194,0.00033809108,0.000088429195,0.09830915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047310192,0.55258185,0.0019579227,0.014864781,0.007807187,0.00017693966,0.00057531317,0.000431279,0.37429452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991308,0.00028457478,0.000039675753,0.00015725278,0.00027474243,0.00011293756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914324,0.000418122,0.000097636184,0.00004305715,0.00020149798,0.00009636397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010618914,0.0015720243,0.0006835558,0.0019334594,0.0032247594,0.0057165516,0.0010567735,0.0024957743,0.038827155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021221582,0.00066235365,0.00055914256,0.0029783738,0.0029085765,0.006290963,0.0019770204,0.004677398,0.014308911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004006706,0.000020648331,0.0003090996,0.0005343363,0.000011418534,0.00008727114,0.0051090815,0.000072069415,0.00015822759,0.053893883,0.8892965,0.050467487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068103454,0.000005103233,0.0014172533,0.0004996314,0.0000045759307,0.00009334512,0.0015050154,0.000024250645,0.000067871624,0.007730941,0.98863655,0.000008641261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058478925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0957488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058478925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067012953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040288083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12988979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250827437","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-28760-3","title":"Reclaiming Liberalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Liberalism; Hubris; Independence (probability theory); Functional illiteracy; Epistemology; Power (physics); Political science; Philosophy; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22677638153472696,"score_gpt":0.33500505305278894,"score_spread":0.10822867151806198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250827437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017620979,0.004939907,0.003307123,0.036173318,0.0012565862,0.000023442759,0.000043640324,0.000035301768,0.9365997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7099384,0.0021108617,0.001668293,0.013523346,0.0014681084,0.00009832257,0.00004258535,0.00013436885,0.27101564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967085,0.0015945256,0.00007875203,0.00034253913,0.00069341494,0.0005821749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747854,0.001276385,0.00012483244,0.00046941746,0.00047198785,0.00017889883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004263329,0.0003748044,0.00047066578,0.0011878653,0.0055801817,0.008164975,0.001045745,0.0037941907,0.008560359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067054797,0.00026279144,0.00026766447,0.0014081179,0.042492587,0.0062031434,0.005170769,0.00801323,0.0013112494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016220235,0.0000026994012,0.0000087974995,0.0000038900303,3.591874e-7,0.0000056276076,0.0010024827,0.000014116711,0.000010497874,0.99627495,0.0018887051,0.0007862403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008940066,0.0000058017604,0.00010121977,0.00005608261,0.0000018762017,0.000021202899,0.0012382909,0.00008105679,0.00007651422,0.85140723,0.14699677,0.000005080448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010578771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0148400385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010578771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009739617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007669957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07066625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251762122","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.001","title":"EMPIRE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE REAL SPANISH CONTRIBUTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; International law; Political science; Articulation (sociology); Law; Humanism; Natural law; Politics; Vocabulary; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04463799458015297,"score_gpt":0.21915463777847477,"score_spread":0.1745166431983218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251762122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033040233,0.042401403,0.0010094353,0.0775983,0.001159336,0.000010500906,0.000064330205,0.0000329197,0.8446835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86018854,0.023048798,0.0007225798,0.011030022,0.0020892257,0.000029158507,0.00008426881,0.00009990157,0.10270758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981729,0.00063075894,0.000045822482,0.00017462597,0.00046899717,0.00050694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825007,0.00074193644,0.0001361577,0.00018479727,0.0004547385,0.00023229845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032251643,0.0003675279,0.0004808295,0.0014260882,0.0041487566,0.012451571,0.00062654965,0.0023991389,0.0059850146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005021321,0.00025907427,0.00029074957,0.0017817833,0.014545739,0.004639359,0.0038415673,0.00487049,0.0004935288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014272243,0.000023614262,0.00064830325,0.000041616095,0.000006572401,0.00008385447,0.004409681,0.00015104117,0.00004287698,0.9714137,0.011359303,0.011805236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003363539,0.0000142256,0.004065125,0.00036856777,0.00001216715,0.000089818066,0.0056024864,0.00027801725,0.0000810301,0.17113791,0.81830066,0.000016229513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053302027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040788963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053302027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017278392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00885378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12536407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253518044","doi":"10.1002/9781119009924.eopr0373","title":"Spinoza, Baruch","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Secularism; Epistemology; Divine providence; Religious studies; Theology; Islam","score_opus":0.0265501627936296,"score_gpt":0.24533161511097173,"score_spread":0.21878145231734214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253518044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034452002,0.12038066,0.0018723031,0.07881306,0.008857423,0.00001931353,0.00019586371,0.00010068786,0.7863155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19851173,0.060179878,0.0020705652,0.02728388,0.0035624243,0.00008809527,0.00018549712,0.0002806981,0.7078373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994318,0.00017750719,0.00001870755,0.00012683605,0.00015743372,0.000087699715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999663,0.00011092159,0.000028314107,0.000028957817,0.00010657157,0.00006220309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051786815,0.00053031894,0.0003459164,0.0012357603,0.00607648,0.0071477713,0.00042718468,0.0022811617,0.021721015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019495117,0.00020881499,0.00020476896,0.0015569297,0.005216331,0.0048575373,0.0021277,0.0038810463,0.006504855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023836219,0.000017129823,0.00015845391,0.000097884724,0.0000028258669,0.00008645236,0.002630984,0.000037231628,0.00008167047,0.7147359,0.25243744,0.029690184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002806124,0.0000042443926,0.00019467266,0.00012407376,0.0000015118225,0.000063785825,0.00071247696,0.000030048222,0.000049265196,0.029345665,0.96946657,0.0000048866495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01609009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022962444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021721015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00313635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002997958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07266402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253811883","doi":"10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0421","title":"<scp>G</scp>rotius,<scp>H</scp>ugo (1583–1645)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02597654486666185,"score_gpt":0.2572676608061142,"score_spread":0.23129111593945234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253811883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033026761,0.026334602,0.0006812371,0.0059371316,0.0039550443,0.00001868391,0.001403195,0.00024133749,0.958126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06881801,0.018816793,0.00073003274,0.0013193103,0.0018321035,0.00004340687,0.0011154901,0.00058426685,0.9067406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999775,0.000049305036,0.0000091201755,0.0000371988,0.00008386653,0.000045471337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983716,0.000042810294,0.000028619268,0.000018040962,0.00003965866,0.000033646695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030599878,0.0004856662,0.00019450836,0.0015708744,0.001957533,0.0035903035,0.00035440948,0.0009908822,0.09182809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096555846,0.00010050332,0.00010186901,0.0025973185,0.0014311391,0.0016432444,0.0013513854,0.001140885,0.027016232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051785926,0.00001615117,0.00043137308,0.00029784604,0.0000043101486,0.00022352891,0.002569982,0.00007762594,0.00026599504,0.1699953,0.6824345,0.14363158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012071137,0.0000019535921,0.00039545476,0.0000889665,5.286742e-7,0.000047958187,0.00021035258,0.0000091762195,0.00008627972,0.0021282423,0.99702793,0.0000019054038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012577058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022899639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09182809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020136319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011833807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3071956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254376792","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.037","title":"DISTINCTIONS OF POWER AND THE POWER OF DISTINCTIONS: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KOSKENNIEMI","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Rationalization (economics); Power (physics); Epistemology; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Pretext; Law; Empire; Sociology; Political science; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029781548179835825,"score_gpt":0.22118174203996982,"score_spread":0.191400193860134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254376792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010285749,0.0088134445,0.00017413274,0.9846565,0.0025025257,0.0000025329207,0.000011019106,0.0000070404544,0.002804248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13851967,0.019795395,0.0012095685,0.78848207,0.029160602,0.000069955095,0.000038366936,0.0001210192,0.022603327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98616403,0.008345521,0.00042022808,0.0014094702,0.0021297645,0.0015309931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98125976,0.013833941,0.0007587625,0.000419068,0.0022134904,0.0015148536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016074674,0.00094647263,0.00165398,0.0015163039,0.010949265,0.011793765,0.004473187,0.020668108,0.003177515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024642296,0.0006900688,0.0008532778,0.0024617678,0.039208442,0.018018134,0.0076577645,0.03882712,0.00068775576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053033764,0.00002461726,0.00023318351,0.00009466479,0.000012610085,0.0004169287,0.032716867,0.00014737024,0.0001359425,0.5096231,0.45140007,0.00514166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052896197,0.000029061783,0.0006376692,0.00036238634,0.000011369585,0.00028546792,0.030591065,0.00033263987,0.00017734552,0.12346504,0.843979,0.00007598631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035561413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046195336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035561413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018257149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009574521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13246548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289257091","doi":"10.2307/20058717","title":"Leo Strauss, Max Weber, and the Scientific Study of Politics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0418645297458982,"score_gpt":0.23632561349382386,"score_spread":0.19446108374792564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289257091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033394147,0.30175826,0.0031436442,0.61050034,0.0027067105,0.000020512402,0.00012909913,0.00004382899,0.07835824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4138542,0.35584396,0.0072945,0.09660472,0.020678917,0.00021497637,0.00015416088,0.00031974466,0.10503478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480295,0.0024524082,0.00023381623,0.00051250885,0.0016214702,0.00037679155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98172665,0.014755236,0.0006840815,0.0006138708,0.0015101401,0.00070998113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008864796,0.00066540134,0.0010607045,0.0070442073,0.009231542,0.009972326,0.0010734188,0.0074806763,0.0053960183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021998342,0.0009585749,0.0003919071,0.008118455,0.032581415,0.016055891,0.0029530074,0.005426552,0.0009026385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016830274,0.000010513109,0.0002559922,0.00010502212,0.0000057981993,0.000024672387,0.0020448375,0.00015214132,0.00002781334,0.9188892,0.06908554,0.009381651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017415134,0.0000042549123,0.00042178202,0.00033438668,0.0000063730135,0.000027617343,0.001201979,0.00015333791,0.000051531675,0.70298964,0.2947704,0.000021274946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13117546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1949035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13117546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01757872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017655807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26082385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291124257","doi":"10.1057/s11231-022-09361-y","title":"Clinical Spinoza: Integrating his Philosophy with Contemporary Therapeutic Practice, by Ian S. Miller, Routledge, Abingdon and New York, 2022, 348 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Psychoanalysis","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.07667875503060545,"score_gpt":0.3142916903370485,"score_spread":0.23761293530644306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291124257","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005742888,0.79044324,0.0021004477,0.18390776,0.0050576106,0.000026651429,0.000024552326,0.000054871995,0.01781057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034569092,0.8417938,0.010587472,0.0527688,0.006807211,0.0003066093,0.000064785345,0.00016083273,0.05294146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974153,0.0014884355,0.00013594462,0.00019365126,0.0006303274,0.00013638276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755657,0.0015691804,0.00013303194,0.000076309276,0.00034074337,0.00032413955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051623774,0.001015928,0.00073548313,0.0027794575,0.0042566196,0.0069518653,0.0016881266,0.0048618703,0.0048323446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00908223,0.000831161,0.00053498696,0.0032085155,0.016021974,0.011706932,0.0041794507,0.008576018,0.0018407659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062078696,0.00006568946,0.0003761048,0.0011928929,0.000019846917,0.00035599654,0.011742366,0.00020088999,0.00016811548,0.11415146,0.6543887,0.21727589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021882532,0.000019223306,0.00096972525,0.0024444996,0.000011382765,0.0010065326,0.0078776665,0.00019912713,0.00009635488,0.09293303,0.8943938,0.000026803931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023497097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06048034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023497097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052807406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014016136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046720684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294982935","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190220945.013.12","title":"Spinoza’s Failed Rhetoric of a Supposedly Inconspicuous Transition to Secularity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Rhetorical question; Prudence; Politics; Rhetoric; Enlightenment; Philosophy; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Literature; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03939136707443369,"score_gpt":0.2064943817225714,"score_spread":0.1671030146481377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294982935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06856779,0.009540366,0.008842422,0.060598686,0.0020459816,0.000020577194,0.00004973063,0.000118851865,0.8502155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96639186,0.0010626067,0.00075804355,0.0020751802,0.00018590064,0.000009758264,0.000010326714,0.000054168624,0.029452082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809045,0.0011567625,0.00004498093,0.00014638901,0.00038509452,0.00017623648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974439,0.0018299973,0.00013166634,0.00016914809,0.00031779695,0.000107480766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026628494,0.00026921977,0.00022786488,0.00089688797,0.004968785,0.0065658046,0.00044147656,0.0014544417,0.0030414246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046698963,0.0001556083,0.00010990487,0.0007670226,0.017660322,0.004825887,0.0014573768,0.0044532097,0.0004790725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018081568,0.000004783135,0.000084108,0.000026128471,0.0000017195968,0.000058420752,0.014112034,0.000047781636,0.00013635015,0.97330666,0.0072658183,0.004938083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001710186,0.00003824395,0.0007974255,0.00042168968,0.000016997457,0.0002267841,0.026348043,0.0007727756,0.001502513,0.35084158,0.618992,0.000024881114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069514546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01087356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069514546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062957876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018015208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04567933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301499090","doi":"","title":"Aristotle on justice in exchange: commensurability by fiat","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commensurability (mathematics); Economic Justice; Fiat money; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Law; Monetary economics; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.018784875597106544,"score_gpt":0.18439875317551974,"score_spread":0.1656138775784132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301499090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027602646,0.017029703,0.04482304,0.036078244,0.0012972639,0.000051608997,0.000070943024,0.00006610945,0.8729805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94753546,0.0033993435,0.008798592,0.0039932253,0.0007142954,0.00011202001,0.000023811392,0.00006007561,0.03536313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718094,0.0014922156,0.00008661971,0.00033774623,0.00058732677,0.0003150814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901617,0.0005478906,0.000074295094,0.00015245179,0.00014766162,0.00006150651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034803585,0.0004459913,0.000600018,0.0015159429,0.00589099,0.0055493196,0.0006363431,0.0035420775,0.0030741214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044090226,0.00021206787,0.00044000713,0.0009531734,0.033101007,0.00824225,0.0029221824,0.0038168356,0.0005680036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023921575,0.0000010467061,0.00001037677,0.0000030097178,5.784458e-7,0.0000097467255,0.00033344893,0.000046504614,0.0000069942203,0.9985637,0.0004031571,0.00061899505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004172178,0.0000056314707,0.000040488012,0.000022625069,0.0000012849539,0.000020783069,0.00018149776,0.00012368364,0.000031094907,0.9789681,0.02059686,0.00000392517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042277155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036638044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006149051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006149051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021687318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044614732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306174607","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2022-4lqlm","title":"“Felicity” and “Makarismos”: Hobbes on Happiness and His Intellectual Sources","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Prosperity; Expansive; Politics; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Philosophy; Positive economics; Social science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; History","score_opus":0.06599571339275874,"score_gpt":0.25436261084782524,"score_spread":0.18836689745506652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306174607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06078978,0.055215787,0.031942222,0.09964708,0.0022074536,0.000033770753,0.000102139056,0.00009989477,0.7499619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527971,0.0070836116,0.0031371121,0.004422259,0.0017470677,0.000062027175,0.0000314087,0.00007719473,0.03064216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886036,0.00075793755,0.000021160402,0.00010172174,0.0001696819,0.00008914234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918586,0.00055297907,0.000059805036,0.00006450483,0.00007267809,0.000064202446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018078439,0.0004434338,0.00037175365,0.0015568445,0.003777008,0.0045228763,0.00046609435,0.0016493708,0.0022919157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028554774,0.00016608788,0.00023635587,0.0010512553,0.01951536,0.004483934,0.0021925683,0.0029032144,0.0004852051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006874011,0.0000036505855,0.000049837123,0.000010382803,0.0000016941025,0.000023453413,0.0033909595,0.000046881,0.000028802942,0.9924918,0.0023618275,0.0015838651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004721741,0.000007453497,0.00025385548,0.00007677937,0.0000031738143,0.00004345566,0.0022018456,0.00023319473,0.00009828681,0.92818743,0.0688839,0.000005910862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014297127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001287861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045228763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027654818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006786521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02006501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309423660","doi":"10.51619/stk.v98i2.24620","title":"The Freedom of Religion Is a Divine Idea","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Modernity; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030441717408114126,"score_gpt":0.24167231978827655,"score_spread":0.21123060238016242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309423660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027849786,0.029275171,0.038876586,0.09536025,0.0027491278,0.00004831537,0.0001550727,0.00010023605,0.80558544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92564696,0.007872347,0.007280113,0.0113727795,0.0029800632,0.000118879085,0.00010313197,0.00007897944,0.044546664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975521,0.0013598915,0.000082830506,0.0002676812,0.00051217276,0.00022528833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811435,0.0009908915,0.00017625769,0.00037438152,0.00016363397,0.00018054871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023709317,0.00027493812,0.00042244646,0.00090174004,0.0033764134,0.0056387987,0.00053406175,0.0019087901,0.005289755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003236643,0.00013065053,0.0003351507,0.00076654955,0.03318846,0.0059162066,0.0034885346,0.0041353777,0.0009188119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003326689,0.000003191898,0.00006372312,0.000013211679,0.0000018451772,0.0000075051,0.00083946914,0.000033779215,0.00002894356,0.9950428,0.0010680367,0.0028941047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009565097,0.000011195344,0.00026131773,0.00007399484,0.0000027893418,0.000047382717,0.0006373096,0.00007859227,0.00005997756,0.8388163,0.15999404,0.0000076093384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016042984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001206434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056387987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021027566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018667316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017696023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309767496","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229","title":"Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0785813972591514,"score_gpt":0.30581475664917307,"score_spread":0.22723335939002165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309767496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03794729,0.009738664,0.01098114,0.026789054,0.0005654409,0.000033971617,0.00005688817,0.000036178088,0.91385144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95510435,0.0022511159,0.0021528583,0.0018840005,0.00032073594,0.000050178616,0.000021119007,0.00003381425,0.038181797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981869,0.0009498825,0.00008149386,0.0002619936,0.00026032617,0.00025931222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979101,0.0012454261,0.00015374883,0.00026288917,0.00023301598,0.00019482734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033713758,0.00034555764,0.0006883528,0.0014948645,0.009172876,0.008822348,0.0008489269,0.002802279,0.006970552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037390527,0.00037101866,0.0005157637,0.0013433729,0.044082243,0.010515295,0.003698624,0.0062695104,0.0005941251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039850156,0.0000023149908,0.000028309014,0.000004780655,8.1388214e-7,0.000008896102,0.0011706561,0.00001861614,0.000007974407,0.99796873,0.0002508426,0.0005341219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001242867,0.0000063855027,0.00010086649,0.00002445886,0.0000025314196,0.00004372268,0.0013875098,0.00009124224,0.000021827478,0.97815406,0.020149479,0.0000054362436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008342426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009179853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009172876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054577086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003482564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039598644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310532560","doi":"10.33137/rr.v45i2.39762","title":"Milton’s Shakespeare: Imitation and Originality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Philosophy; Nothing; Majesty; Imitation; Agency (philosophy); Literature; Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.040685722196810804,"score_gpt":0.24542228481928083,"score_spread":0.20473656262247003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310532560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12025986,0.015456632,0.008947361,0.028269282,0.0012067907,0.000035848418,0.000032203036,0.0001392333,0.8256528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96470845,0.0012897453,0.0006494958,0.00077080855,0.00017014469,0.000020007632,0.0000080657255,0.000047600377,0.032335725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758697,0.0015328288,0.000049084796,0.00023781683,0.00040283304,0.00019053272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980584,0.0012437007,0.00015178305,0.00025657212,0.00016380996,0.00012567571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022958128,0.0003705637,0.0002946592,0.0009573405,0.0058447435,0.0074378783,0.0005742003,0.001748345,0.0029353215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062581096,0.00020135059,0.00013800764,0.00070927216,0.03225003,0.00583703,0.003747483,0.0028574974,0.00045941584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026748485,0.00000969008,0.00027435675,0.000045225912,0.0000037523084,0.00025049242,0.09397943,0.00010121562,0.0001535917,0.88655275,0.007946741,0.010655965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021491811,0.00006623328,0.0012539267,0.0004267333,0.000012054297,0.00064421963,0.0429784,0.0006955854,0.0011347472,0.25406396,0.698663,0.000039597933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003590708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005021226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074378783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00293655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016384692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021306336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311534887","doi":"10.51151/identities.v19i1-2.496","title":"Freedom is a Point of Departure, Not a Horizon","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Identities Journal for Politics Gender and Culture","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Horizon; Criticism; Biography; Sociology; Citation; Politics; Classics; Philosophy; Art history; Law; History; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06542715027492392,"score_gpt":0.28031108901496476,"score_spread":0.21488393874004086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311534887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064235604,0.21221606,0.026061257,0.3090043,0.027283734,0.000061111765,0.00013733699,0.0001285703,0.41868412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5764286,0.18181364,0.011223998,0.08926606,0.026036374,0.00034531328,0.00023267869,0.00068811415,0.11396526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871219,0.0072297584,0.00043379833,0.001205716,0.0032478562,0.00076111325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866702,0.009865327,0.0005914123,0.001130132,0.0012091781,0.0005338508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011268273,0.0008137434,0.0010845327,0.0025028798,0.007192153,0.013546077,0.0022851045,0.004825692,0.005907461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01119699,0.00050370203,0.00090588746,0.0028054737,0.09442525,0.021722678,0.0062967516,0.011411812,0.0019884733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052880864,0.0000039548945,0.000032563938,0.000098233824,0.0000025815664,0.000019623283,0.0031316075,0.000054729087,0.00001660311,0.97367555,0.016765319,0.006194041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056433114,0.000014333643,0.00019191192,0.0009396047,0.0000027122542,0.00006692277,0.003799541,0.00012575406,0.00007735625,0.40215442,0.59259886,0.000022909771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077095735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071994467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013773202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013773202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008644509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099932075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312039558","doi":"10.1017/s1369415422000541","title":"Ido Geiger, Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World: A Transcendental Reading of the Critique of the Power of Judgment Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022 Pp. xiv + 225 ISBN 9781108834261 (hbk) £75.00","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Geiger counter; Power (physics); Theology; Epistemology; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.046358073295605026,"score_gpt":0.25960508308420627,"score_spread":0.21324700978860123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312039558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006328308,0.8647307,0.0012190581,0.07610119,0.0016438923,0.000004898775,0.000057384586,0.000020028796,0.055589996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118802816,0.7424348,0.004235392,0.04420114,0.009409648,0.000100030964,0.00015512762,0.00016781551,0.08049332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694544,0.001845446,0.00012222286,0.00021402024,0.0006690949,0.00020381874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681723,0.002320955,0.00021300523,0.0001517812,0.00039056936,0.00010635316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032518792,0.0010777321,0.0010043661,0.0039075897,0.002645037,0.006028457,0.0015580753,0.006550287,0.008651577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060920417,0.000679206,0.00060497195,0.0050255805,0.018695073,0.011195823,0.0024372612,0.006679512,0.0028049934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047243026,0.000014082436,0.00014972438,0.0005942507,0.00001933027,0.000074403426,0.0030928915,0.00022157139,0.000095768686,0.7230849,0.24857146,0.024034407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017668674,0.000010552026,0.0008452481,0.0017175942,0.000015422049,0.00015374052,0.0022723707,0.00009298975,0.00014898357,0.4476425,0.54705864,0.000024225064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010509173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014579057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010509173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062087867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059235143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045048177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312050266","doi":"10.1177/03061973221139270","title":"The freedom dilemma: Milton's (and Adam's) inability to reconcile reason and authority","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literature & History","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Paradise lost; Sermon; Dilemma; Scholarship; Adam smith; Politics; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Literature; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Political science; Theology; Economics","score_opus":0.023027892321749076,"score_gpt":0.2066878440560039,"score_spread":0.18365995173425484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312050266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057262763,0.016812326,0.009243147,0.29573566,0.001238028,0.000029695913,0.000030136154,0.000039379058,0.6196089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94025606,0.0024231996,0.0016777458,0.012857039,0.00067548675,0.000050338494,0.0000109282055,0.000045486275,0.04200381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949706,0.0032237088,0.00007388565,0.0004995657,0.0005475778,0.0006846342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716216,0.0020130675,0.0001925474,0.000181782,0.00015288423,0.00029749266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055934987,0.00032853038,0.0004411526,0.0015222968,0.012806821,0.009666824,0.0009825536,0.0056598145,0.0027629014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060432553,0.0003941972,0.00030792298,0.0008784107,0.07579222,0.01212797,0.0064739217,0.010545174,0.00036322858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065915783,0.0000034490643,0.00003959151,0.0000075980684,0.0000010559054,0.000053196698,0.01332205,0.000044630102,0.000014004365,0.9806998,0.004117251,0.001690777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001590419,0.000011983219,0.00018400206,0.00016405439,0.0000035470198,0.00014333005,0.011215488,0.00018231143,0.00010789024,0.7857639,0.20218979,0.000017810116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065317973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075866417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012806821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00828318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004124758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060099006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312271388","doi":"10.7202/1084472ar","title":"The Shapes of Modernity: On the Philosophical Roots of Anthropological Doctrines","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Philosophical anthropology; Epistemology; Sociology; Anthropology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08617476079172452,"score_gpt":0.28474341836620015,"score_spread":0.19856865757447562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312271388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11996224,0.11463566,0.027095087,0.16836774,0.0021039958,0.000053133175,0.00006378073,0.000069504975,0.56764895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97213405,0.014174794,0.003360236,0.0038585984,0.0013137106,0.000058879174,0.000014651489,0.00004755855,0.0050374977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627244,0.0026248917,0.00008393879,0.00029174835,0.0004977657,0.00022922795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98984677,0.007949508,0.00047919087,0.0007569449,0.0005890574,0.00037853004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008612213,0.0005210777,0.0005716558,0.0035060546,0.00501968,0.0090568345,0.0012622133,0.00309588,0.0039780675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00947698,0.00035566505,0.00037084785,0.0026445428,0.103368334,0.01720015,0.0061427276,0.006506115,0.0003465847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055160526,0.00000669941,0.00008667122,0.00001758817,0.0000015373678,0.000018001261,0.008939083,0.00006665643,0.000020145082,0.98767614,0.00039912853,0.0027628732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006679509,0.0000059012214,0.0002648372,0.00013088505,0.0000018536922,0.000031034964,0.005540263,0.00018368248,0.000025622494,0.97305804,0.020745184,0.00000597456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002574911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024091224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090568345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046482594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016712046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045546293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312319156","doi":"10.15581/016.61.41670","title":"Javier HERVADA, Critical Introduction to Natural Right, Libraire Wilson &amp; Lafleur inc., Montréal 2020, 2ª ed., suprevised by Carlos José Errázuriz and Petar Popović, with linguistic consultant Dawn Eden Goldstein, translated from Spanish by Mindy Emmons for the first edition (supervised by Ernest Caparros), XVII + 135 pp., ISBN 978-2-92497-406-3","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius Canonicum","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.009390506827487974,"score_gpt":0.21437214763738505,"score_spread":0.20498164080989706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312319156","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056315924,0.69879246,0.0027944108,0.08360559,0.016009824,0.00004887917,0.0013192218,0.00053924485,0.19632725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018846685,0.3157643,0.0038096246,0.012635939,0.008290766,0.00015241018,0.0010963805,0.0007442014,0.63865966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998662,0.00043999785,0.00005577623,0.00020432512,0.0005225971,0.000115199975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829787,0.00068867987,0.00009237781,0.000089327885,0.00067872915,0.00015310157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022348133,0.0013180312,0.0006859311,0.003359349,0.0038637382,0.006293339,0.0016832687,0.0019891292,0.06750686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038797744,0.00076122425,0.00038133244,0.0036872048,0.004258983,0.004941968,0.0013810621,0.0026215955,0.021508176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010267326,0.0000035902833,0.000044619395,0.00016149822,0.0000020063865,0.000027372564,0.00069734105,0.000035326346,0.000041983014,0.01545162,0.9632563,0.020268023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014925339,0.0000011006734,0.00019004445,0.00021793503,9.602323e-7,0.000024932615,0.00037956276,0.000015977872,0.000032232445,0.0014461246,0.9976853,0.000004283497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21033573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35197964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21033573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010561301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00991206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4182229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312603535","doi":"10.57027/eikasia.97.234","title":"Bayle y Voltaire: la apuesta por la tolerancia","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Eikasía Revista de Filosofía","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Service de Recherche et d'EXpertise en Transformation des Produits Forestiers","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.021126808521315762,"score_gpt":0.26079966499742735,"score_spread":0.23967285647611158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312603535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07713197,0.020135818,0.02456124,0.15785976,0.001469626,0.000037203452,0.00013620922,0.000163827,0.7185044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8679517,0.0033084587,0.0034702586,0.0090247905,0.00037232976,0.000058085254,0.000038908776,0.00009778027,0.11567766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818605,0.0008423812,0.000049752725,0.00026152655,0.00041090517,0.00024942835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984555,0.00068797753,0.00019723806,0.00017109672,0.0003269079,0.0001611664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016583588,0.00036047437,0.0002569856,0.0009147073,0.00436834,0.0054415073,0.0006681163,0.0028772957,0.007080722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045622857,0.00016922815,0.00033651828,0.0008263655,0.018446494,0.0058965613,0.0041157263,0.004596699,0.0008610347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013728508,0.000004039774,0.00025343362,0.000022275959,0.0000021818464,0.000050520277,0.012244689,0.000045168763,0.00013819468,0.97643024,0.0058754697,0.004920045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016894302,0.000034387056,0.0019813273,0.00022332904,0.000009900592,0.0002679228,0.013995425,0.0003167804,0.000464752,0.3799104,0.6027462,0.000032638243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008701425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013753486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008701425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059707994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032058705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04332143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312641190","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_840","title":"Spinoza, Baruch","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Monism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Exposition (narrative); Literature","score_opus":0.07263467058,"score_gpt":0.22919957706643493,"score_spread":0.15656490648643492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312641190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010790398,0.031962883,0.0011680472,0.010745393,0.0024593095,0.000013054725,0.00010817407,0.000067102075,0.952397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022442443,0.009015844,0.0005746907,0.0026343549,0.00044472358,0.000027278158,0.000064006825,0.00013720198,0.96465945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997882,0.00004386606,0.0000064303154,0.00005900381,0.0000635912,0.00003879863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981815,0.000059224658,0.000011389192,0.000025264462,0.000059001748,0.0000268927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033500057,0.0005438194,0.00046630655,0.0010414093,0.0048931497,0.0065198545,0.0005056009,0.0018728506,0.054150745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001012069,0.00033722288,0.00016766728,0.0013761118,0.003313495,0.0052122893,0.0017252703,0.003269433,0.016528022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014961157,0.000013643052,0.000042229814,0.00004720404,0.0000017145389,0.00002694195,0.0011824635,0.000035902925,0.00006204037,0.7645842,0.20804621,0.025942452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023770287,0.000002014653,0.000073458556,0.000054670258,0.0000015453659,0.0000234448,0.00046343787,0.000024611143,0.000042214808,0.045609154,0.9537001,0.000002940105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01566259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035756722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94584924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002965612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002202673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18115228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313158501","doi":"10.15581/009.30.30645","title":"Hunter, Graeme (ed.): Spinoza: The Enduring Questions, University of Toronto Press, Toronto/Buffalo/London, 1995, 182 págs.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Filosófico","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027781216287791455,"score_gpt":0.23119183880184926,"score_spread":0.2034106225140578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313158501","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026976943,0.9732693,0.00019236538,0.012339112,0.0022001243,0.0000042333563,0.00018786034,0.00003034935,0.011507034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010123529,0.9408317,0.0007074379,0.002729568,0.0027685056,0.000025460744,0.00021675216,0.00008869299,0.042508334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994368,0.00013103061,0.00005157352,0.00007099649,0.00020493401,0.00010470181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853504,0.0006221067,0.00014730223,0.00007199746,0.00038466137,0.00023886538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323589,0.0018419148,0.0014362119,0.004549432,0.00420653,0.007551235,0.0014122972,0.0028435304,0.02986403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029879087,0.0012661875,0.00043261354,0.010615882,0.0048137894,0.009638891,0.0021418089,0.0030049926,0.011928328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051624316,0.000012286994,0.0005318646,0.0014003159,0.000016012658,0.00018907645,0.008162477,0.00007758647,0.00010313955,0.022688895,0.8782038,0.08856302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005701338,0.0000040557643,0.0013522599,0.0014809225,0.000012665919,0.00017333827,0.0040167654,0.000020076732,0.000058977173,0.0046990626,0.9881644,0.00001171787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17088377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45220554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17088377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005572633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011131142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33977824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317396195","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2023.2164951","title":"Was Spinoza a Pagan?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.07508027488688944,"score_gpt":0.2539203822975862,"score_spread":0.17884010741069672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317396195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040761977,0.030412367,0.0019260063,0.19569081,0.0065844823,0.000014946738,0.00010520984,0.00009887527,0.7244054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7660685,0.009458965,0.00070282834,0.038970754,0.0020813206,0.000033331104,0.00008233886,0.00015841245,0.18244356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926,0.00027961342,0.000016656744,0.00018396859,0.00008540815,0.00017432087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996952,0.00010120059,0.000030138883,0.000039716186,0.00005997212,0.00007381911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010454943,0.00032433163,0.00028814923,0.0003831464,0.007319348,0.010300938,0.00032192815,0.002121079,0.010186827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018032951,0.00016495169,0.0001385797,0.00070715795,0.009482761,0.0049711457,0.0020897186,0.0038865139,0.001963207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006051753,0.000009140397,0.0006954477,0.00006520618,0.000004491728,0.00017418686,0.011990096,0.000013846426,0.0001401136,0.927507,0.045390837,0.013949071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010602396,0.000015672196,0.0014716617,0.00021094727,0.000005507595,0.00016356584,0.009492156,0.000040039522,0.0001225866,0.060161915,0.9282926,0.000012712773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007820227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102812685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010300938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034031267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015963567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0340783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317716316","doi":"10.1017/s0034670522001000","title":"Commentary - Timothy W. Burns: Leo Strauss on Democracy, Technology, and Liberal Education. (New York: State University of New York Press, 2021. Pp. 201.)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); State (computer science); Democracy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.05701286610060848,"score_gpt":0.27359157188396954,"score_spread":0.21657870578336105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317716316","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009903825,0.009223029,0.00005122053,0.95164996,0.0373242,0.000010071733,0.00021577443,0.000015196293,0.0014114821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016814334,0.0069801803,0.00008997828,0.9617289,0.020512693,0.00005477236,0.000079316254,0.000046732905,0.008825992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577206,0.001379531,0.00022807796,0.000658159,0.0015450928,0.00041715812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792605,0.013877022,0.0010560657,0.00039469762,0.003829691,0.0015819299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057618823,0.0014761806,0.0016464493,0.0020325119,0.006021372,0.004198628,0.005806032,0.026393496,0.018389707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028178565,0.00095337507,0.0014966284,0.002825011,0.0056823497,0.009123705,0.0033858663,0.037499506,0.010150802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009006875,0.0000013683897,0.0000124425815,0.00008515369,0.0000034607501,0.00002538824,0.00015328907,0.0000072570706,0.00001368346,0.00067124364,0.9982944,0.0007232478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031937256,0.0000087353665,0.0006140293,0.0011354235,0.000023659022,0.00015782967,0.0016171316,0.00004185689,0.0001689088,0.0031536717,0.99300355,0.0000432114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07543187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15107007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07543187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010472065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012218596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14998567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455187","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.017","title":"Jacobi’s Impact on Idealism and Romanticism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Romanticism; Idealism; Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Art history; Art; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05807584909639213,"score_gpt":0.22781796253833206,"score_spread":0.16974211344193993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059476513,0.005212094,0.00052743667,0.0055496423,0.00032865928,0.0000038842186,0.000014883243,0.000017526214,0.98239833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6672442,0.0075250673,0.0010340571,0.0016269389,0.0007368454,0.000015529631,0.00004706833,0.000090761634,0.32167947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930525,0.00027864566,0.00001612938,0.00006524206,0.00024252111,0.000092251714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947196,0.0002574771,0.000027536136,0.00008663139,0.00009541174,0.000060963666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010997311,0.00020909253,0.00027721914,0.00070627267,0.002265042,0.0038788733,0.00042842462,0.00061697036,0.011872354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014733017,0.000108110165,0.00019936192,0.0007259664,0.0091031315,0.0021785777,0.00149988,0.002552172,0.0016225065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007325428,0.000007120323,0.00005947077,0.000020374333,9.4127074e-7,0.000024730443,0.002691352,0.00006120757,0.000038146394,0.97980267,0.009891588,0.0073950063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007813485,0.000011118033,0.00061529985,0.00013165416,0.0000031476259,0.00013256595,0.003318917,0.00036319898,0.00027569474,0.46880716,0.5263238,0.000009610439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00419937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005627025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011872354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044713486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018139706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03971696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455218","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.021","title":"Jacobi as Literary Author","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Feeling; Context (archaeology); Literature; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Epistemology; History; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07234171670530089,"score_gpt":0.22644620130568283,"score_spread":0.15410448460038195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044121486,0.04664963,0.0014365743,0.032357264,0.0082601765,0.000020731472,0.00011044849,0.0002344688,0.9065185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1020999,0.020865772,0.0015027778,0.008178518,0.0028543398,0.000045174806,0.00011282361,0.00047163595,0.86386913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894696,0.00023605088,0.000038722123,0.00017718435,0.0004533519,0.00014778449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992029,0.00029154803,0.00004618625,0.000065108834,0.0002680235,0.00012619018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010169855,0.00048252355,0.00041741724,0.0017630685,0.005538533,0.0065625147,0.0006151147,0.0012183888,0.012905776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018805653,0.00025049897,0.00015321649,0.0016035585,0.004241595,0.004017793,0.001799913,0.0032736093,0.006180931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020723308,0.000020691039,0.0002898149,0.00017382583,0.0000045038296,0.0001779877,0.01919547,0.000063460204,0.00045052433,0.54871446,0.3820436,0.048845027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011152788,0.000002948606,0.00009956687,0.00009588639,0.0000010326542,0.000077167846,0.001318409,0.000029205878,0.000119881544,0.006644131,0.9916074,0.0000033114782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068543814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015223609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012905776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055471333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043880516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043174148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455229","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.010","title":"The Jacobi–Schelling Debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Determinism; Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.06875441422419216,"score_gpt":0.20830846278425066,"score_spread":0.13955404856005849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01680979,0.010613027,0.0021255852,0.07863002,0.00092317734,0.000009962083,0.000041238403,0.00003039268,0.89081687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7891811,0.0046117106,0.001238261,0.019129375,0.0013944505,0.000057914625,0.000032884498,0.000111314854,0.18424295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767643,0.0008313712,0.000044360873,0.00036161707,0.0006790771,0.00040712117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858785,0.001008431,0.00006051463,0.000111895824,0.00012388456,0.00010741302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002609579,0.0003173121,0.00041312602,0.0008820372,0.007861317,0.0060088024,0.0007453652,0.0043248665,0.005564927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004158066,0.0001916872,0.00032438606,0.0012053244,0.027500222,0.0042782756,0.0028751185,0.005836313,0.00081939594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037923817,0.0000025640504,0.000031048232,0.000007236573,7.35186e-7,0.000016265125,0.0023870934,0.000025499763,0.00002286955,0.9908601,0.0053644595,0.0012782847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012331522,0.0000055912574,0.00020804275,0.00011202293,0.0000022920817,0.00004875742,0.0022480236,0.00010060142,0.00022537097,0.58226144,0.4147651,0.000010462253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126816435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01715285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126816435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011234684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050273975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0815137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455237","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.013","title":"Jacobi and the Revival of Socraticism: The Muenster Circle and Existentialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05320358500578087,"score_gpt":0.20238956445755343,"score_spread":0.14918597945177256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020216607,0.0131768435,0.0014619931,0.025726007,0.00050120155,0.000009470439,0.000016899412,0.000027843455,0.93886316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8732138,0.004706481,0.0006140203,0.0034765885,0.00056149875,0.000020437205,0.000014302357,0.000066342465,0.11732654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988625,0.00061167986,0.000023134504,0.00009666139,0.00023726767,0.00016880101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992372,0.0004101713,0.000058348265,0.00013264503,0.000091424365,0.00007020982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023508184,0.00028858168,0.00024634838,0.0008103013,0.0047027515,0.005794612,0.00051935285,0.001182905,0.004699418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023264827,0.00015029014,0.0001673019,0.0008159967,0.029452393,0.0047319136,0.0022289536,0.0033078461,0.0004694911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045584356,0.000003020033,0.00002546772,0.000012976712,5.4068954e-7,0.000012347006,0.0056008287,0.000036052956,0.000017259508,0.9880354,0.0038342744,0.0024172147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010364374,0.000009226427,0.00041185805,0.00017804149,0.0000029866992,0.00006977486,0.010739295,0.00023200114,0.00018183167,0.6559915,0.33216217,0.000011013917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006355221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007353375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007353375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029462609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053352773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319455252","doi":"10.1017/9781009244978.007","title":"Jacobi and Kant","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Autonomy; Philosophy; Fatalism; Mechanism (biology); Atheism; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06449410566163831,"score_gpt":0.20239728019074293,"score_spread":0.1379031745291046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319455252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047361245,0.034387186,0.00723454,0.03196088,0.0014412482,0.000027753418,0.00008998095,0.00008914969,0.9200331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4341706,0.021946974,0.011442471,0.013128404,0.0020772864,0.0001672023,0.00012798127,0.00025417452,0.51668495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982652,0.00064284453,0.00006255114,0.0002494876,0.00054418214,0.00023567256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930966,0.00032218872,0.00004683848,0.000119356475,0.00014305385,0.000058954367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017401759,0.0005790843,0.0004627756,0.0013312927,0.0050958185,0.0055311583,0.0005811753,0.0026803724,0.0065584807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023252545,0.0003674683,0.00033437327,0.0013135325,0.017360568,0.004319636,0.002149666,0.0044299993,0.0022511329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005326162,0.0000044857625,0.000039800354,0.00001684011,0.0000014860161,0.000011619814,0.00084756326,0.00006345676,0.000028712262,0.9843077,0.01022869,0.0044442653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006904395,0.0000058909836,0.00013601981,0.000081206104,0.0000021831736,0.00005396925,0.0005739934,0.0001422329,0.00013187855,0.66209775,0.33675957,0.00000836272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092501445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010750588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092501445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076987497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054096216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055858552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320913076","doi":"10.5206/ls.2022.14638","title":"Review of Barducci's Hugo Grotius and the Century of Revolution, 1613-1718","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Intellectual history; Philosophy; History; Classics; Economic history","score_opus":0.07059268915087887,"score_gpt":0.29957667798148285,"score_spread":0.228983988830604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320913076","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000105824,0.98940885,0.000020297679,0.004486189,0.0022825713,0.0000018034758,0.000025071411,0.0000021877715,0.0036672368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021636845,0.98484135,0.00004131815,0.0048839734,0.0049220184,0.0000064946785,0.000044527384,0.000007157909,0.0030894768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993999,0.00015132119,0.00004721307,0.00008009904,0.0002591833,0.00006242178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980627,0.0010408974,0.00017627866,0.00004025129,0.00053557596,0.00014432038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001174419,0.00054892356,0.0008561156,0.003734242,0.0011716433,0.0026278559,0.0005894141,0.0014732764,0.005960334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004483087,0.00026504754,0.00020385957,0.0067339553,0.0021688144,0.0025322805,0.0012843736,0.002017486,0.002249835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054769916,0.00002050934,0.00028049594,0.0056064953,0.000027692957,0.00010784451,0.0010327891,0.00009920796,0.00011224991,0.03049583,0.77957135,0.18259083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029972427,0.0000062761997,0.00057616754,0.0026959784,0.0000057060984,0.000062718114,0.00016590294,0.0000037375928,0.000013035756,0.00095271494,0.99551034,0.000004446958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012672816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026498051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012672816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003513179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005599154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025489986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360918867","doi":"10.32881/jomp.247","title":"Spinoza’s Strong Eudaimonism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Modern Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Greeks; Metaphysics; Naturalism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Reading (process); Subject (documents); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10089492881355468,"score_gpt":0.27843365206743814,"score_spread":0.17753872325388348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360918867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06958078,0.0038491997,0.1127035,0.0656888,0.002155139,0.00009400992,0.00012274005,0.00012607565,0.74567974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468445,0.0008291261,0.012659489,0.0070378063,0.00042541022,0.0001302332,0.000034038316,0.00005825333,0.031981166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971409,0.0010412595,0.00017337734,0.00061634363,0.0006565106,0.00037159768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981206,0.0006332018,0.00019081798,0.0002934109,0.0005312797,0.00023060723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040504583,0.0005170292,0.00048012054,0.000773267,0.0039067953,0.004558612,0.00060245715,0.0020130419,0.003819578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004968196,0.00021745464,0.0005544347,0.0003523187,0.016328512,0.0045167706,0.0047007496,0.0044738646,0.0009037111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083967725,0.0000041480353,0.0001062411,0.000011543449,0.0000024408077,0.00001627679,0.00055718486,0.00004706743,0.00008337918,0.99595696,0.00095751183,0.0022488444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013354147,0.000022744069,0.0003636057,0.000048838636,0.000009229097,0.000059953734,0.00050604326,0.00044287776,0.0002780812,0.93770874,0.06053582,0.000010888304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016862891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016514929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004558612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002203914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019748032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021421134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360988482","doi":"10.1108/s1572-832320240000033002","title":"When Mercantilism Upsets Neo-Classical Liberal Thinking: The Pandemic COVID-19 as a Revelation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Mercantilism; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Virology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Theology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Internal medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.0938627968419242,"score_gpt":0.2899934709354666,"score_spread":0.19613067409354243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360988482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06869501,0.011682621,0.013168927,0.41608933,0.003407255,0.000029420482,0.00007604763,0.00012703534,0.48672444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588086,0.0017456004,0.0017217608,0.020457543,0.001203603,0.000034742832,0.00001993867,0.00009099658,0.01591721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558926,0.0028566204,0.00006698452,0.0003822646,0.00059401424,0.0005108952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942257,0.003935007,0.00036548017,0.00054240174,0.000470267,0.00046112505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00785013,0.0004353468,0.00048203117,0.0017946468,0.008943553,0.011101284,0.0008311781,0.006191197,0.0048705526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009343881,0.00025457717,0.00036247377,0.0011046149,0.053798527,0.012841586,0.005894094,0.010078895,0.00064954127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008014723,0.0000047978833,0.000052466108,0.000008105457,0.0000011005494,0.000042681542,0.005431203,0.000064840955,0.000037285703,0.990482,0.0029378985,0.00092958903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008670014,0.000009359719,0.00008228337,0.00007529174,0.0000014516751,0.000049148308,0.0036799926,0.00035291913,0.000080592035,0.9289119,0.06673562,0.000012609636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024132046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00263435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011101284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075321128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027423368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05464959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362512908","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-23984-7_7","title":"Spinoza on the Ontology of Justice: The Role of ‘Beings of Reason’ (Entia Rationis)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Historical-analytical studies on nature, mind and action","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12405085328981116,"score_gpt":0.3075996616647347,"score_spread":0.18354880837492352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362512908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071524796,0.04538347,0.013107253,0.052066356,0.0023013996,0.000035377703,0.000105618106,0.000056150195,0.8797919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6058095,0.01950233,0.010795695,0.015852174,0.0022024391,0.0002617722,0.00008863653,0.00023231287,0.34525514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899274,0.00056723657,0.000028299119,0.0001450753,0.00015466385,0.00011188079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992974,0.00045441164,0.000040655268,0.0000748806,0.00008593417,0.00004678518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017060831,0.0005212668,0.00050726027,0.0009998832,0.0050604427,0.0070415763,0.0006920116,0.002630813,0.0049953447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021062072,0.00030173102,0.0003700035,0.0013003876,0.02475866,0.00795655,0.0024053117,0.005592518,0.0008826744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001868752,0.0000020209513,0.000011367457,0.0000066755124,4.3073658e-7,0.0000058641745,0.00085148506,0.000017890701,0.000013268691,0.9946084,0.00347585,0.001004981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038033083,0.0000029181592,0.00008021143,0.00006403374,0.0000018324421,0.00002899552,0.000844184,0.000106273634,0.00006691589,0.83704257,0.1617535,0.000004707275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118893385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015096169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0118893385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051434063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004754909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03731817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362562445","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-66398-1_8","title":"Herder und die immanente Gegenwart des transzendenten Absoluten","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Neue Romantikforschung","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.08138656343227961,"score_gpt":0.2731587935550228,"score_spread":0.1917722301227432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362562445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04961201,0.0056749466,0.0059605055,0.009037725,0.0003402421,0.000020486063,0.000064805994,0.00003574496,0.9292536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87838507,0.0015594881,0.0016731058,0.0010959737,0.00012296958,0.00005789067,0.000042525284,0.000047770987,0.11701533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988681,0.00040674402,0.0000345548,0.00021924489,0.00021299775,0.00025841835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942774,0.00025898393,0.00007442884,0.00010111603,0.0000900182,0.00004759813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002162359,0.00029369607,0.00034245435,0.00093660667,0.0041759494,0.006425076,0.0007917439,0.0017184134,0.013399448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036838918,0.00031858886,0.00022890355,0.0009850455,0.017090589,0.0063863597,0.0038393748,0.00409189,0.0015019443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005745797,0.0000022856702,0.00006252473,0.0000062243344,0.0000011507428,0.0000076273927,0.0019853935,0.00003669751,0.000028326096,0.99441516,0.0009177814,0.0025311543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014661004,0.00001722599,0.00068044243,0.00015116537,0.000008827743,0.000058657886,0.005453948,0.00026605016,0.00025777885,0.81926304,0.17381789,0.00001037154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074517326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01180275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013399448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004797778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025792266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044825613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779046","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0003","title":"Reply to My Critics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Humanity; Irony; Feeling; Philosophy; Character (mathematics); Perfection; Epistemology; Sight; Wonder; Literature; Theology; Art","score_opus":0.21535875454361314,"score_gpt":0.35474281064102936,"score_spread":0.13938405609741622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010012892,0.0011317304,0.00007605589,0.9517684,0.04552829,0.000010828805,0.000032008866,0.00003891908,0.0013136136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014731073,0.00047473024,0.00011684726,0.9718431,0.021731116,0.000054075783,0.000016058448,0.00005476411,0.004236157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98158056,0.004350765,0.0013686628,0.0034975486,0.00659513,0.0026073141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.941152,0.023580194,0.0036192741,0.002653327,0.022356862,0.006638336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019524647,0.0025387565,0.003045781,0.0028150626,0.012663977,0.016274674,0.008078451,0.089099616,0.015866263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13816902,0.0014597811,0.0031923873,0.0026732134,0.017492691,0.016266592,0.009013262,0.13451539,0.014141907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006652194,0.000008190622,0.0000760788,0.000030205256,0.0000056155523,0.00010893452,0.00029611756,0.000015717247,0.000024763489,0.0024657268,0.99564266,0.0013193547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016743677,0.000013214768,0.00026340687,0.00038627576,0.000014762539,0.00029466374,0.0017616776,0.00011442357,0.000105546336,0.0048739878,0.99209607,0.00005919235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00880951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007022897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089099616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01154726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015280116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10325742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366779157","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.0005","title":"The Concealed Influence of Custom: Hume’s “Treatise” from the Inside Out by Jay L. Garfield","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Ignorance; Epistemology; Western thought; Buddhism; Enlightenment; Classics; Theology; History","score_opus":0.10595295251771787,"score_gpt":0.31245531412984323,"score_spread":0.20650236161212537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366779157","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005020995,0.50463426,0.0016007802,0.18957883,0.02754241,0.00003999892,0.00012822366,0.000096084834,0.27135843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12654841,0.22863102,0.0012169816,0.026033835,0.016950645,0.00006503946,0.00018434357,0.00034729647,0.60002255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999116,0.0003758195,0.000022451002,0.000112113354,0.00030188615,0.00007169331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992293,0.00039095813,0.00006122138,0.000032523174,0.00015965427,0.00012634703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010010789,0.0007869097,0.00054213795,0.0011440841,0.0036502175,0.0048290114,0.000589481,0.0018020321,0.013033961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020761527,0.00043129013,0.00025102712,0.0018914614,0.0062258136,0.006841656,0.0021332013,0.0044550872,0.003632889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027166818,0.000022512162,0.00012350934,0.00034777806,0.0000056492277,0.00014069794,0.010652624,0.00020059018,0.00021978561,0.101787105,0.8382348,0.048237786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021079532,0.000006464334,0.00029498356,0.0004954066,0.0000023407533,0.000103472754,0.0024323822,0.000029958155,0.00006166708,0.0070550586,0.98950654,0.0000095375535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011512066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016391458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013033961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003822295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035033037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043602943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366809817","doi":"10.1353/rss.2010.0014","title":"Poetic Emotion Versus Truth: Russell’s Preference for Spinoza Over Locke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empiricism; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Rationalism; Normative; Epistemology; Poetry; Preference; Economics","score_opus":0.11710014578770192,"score_gpt":0.3071857400285279,"score_spread":0.19008559424082597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366809817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096115015,0.009679304,0.10647292,0.16259642,0.0026772849,0.00005548498,0.00008238423,0.00055004883,0.6217711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97909147,0.0011597772,0.00780213,0.004778445,0.00044777122,0.00002451515,0.00001703331,0.0001546037,0.0065242755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297583,0.003631321,0.0003475842,0.00094852695,0.0016067837,0.0004900035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919376,0.0052665803,0.00050582265,0.00072799367,0.0011369581,0.00042504314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008826635,0.00037000456,0.00080278405,0.00199784,0.0028621804,0.008820372,0.0010950029,0.0038832794,0.0036503705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019519841,0.00044028778,0.00057767646,0.001002277,0.034895305,0.01332385,0.0036177335,0.0067503233,0.00081909844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003146224,0.000003886011,0.00009006174,0.000027295611,0.000005201337,0.000027336224,0.0027627405,0.0000605011,0.00010923234,0.9922707,0.0011611803,0.0034504249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022600854,0.000015323481,0.00018264519,0.0000425954,0.000009581786,0.00007242087,0.0013894906,0.00048117983,0.00016167399,0.98263204,0.014974347,0.000016116575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023543749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017206733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008826635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003356805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014474819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046680212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367156997","doi":"10.7202/1094005ar","title":"Arash Abizadeh, \"Hobbes and the Two Faces of Ethics\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Face (sociological concept); Linguistics","score_opus":0.11109434343568528,"score_gpt":0.3194628827909417,"score_spread":0.20836853935525643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367156997","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033461908,0.9190871,0.00034542396,0.07005855,0.006099067,0.0000072356274,0.00006291643,0.000010201555,0.0039948756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016601898,0.8931218,0.00084516767,0.073467255,0.009332512,0.00007042994,0.0000789611,0.000024646748,0.006457245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745697,0.0013229961,0.00015501629,0.0001647605,0.00079401536,0.00010621538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917067,0.006526953,0.00030494347,0.000118286065,0.0011814891,0.00016169422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005189661,0.00061849,0.0010334655,0.0026519848,0.002010169,0.004303107,0.0010459666,0.005727115,0.003999552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016871247,0.00036362596,0.0002786118,0.0042611207,0.0048162527,0.0074040308,0.0015501006,0.004628571,0.0010972472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016611796,0.000034184006,0.0004482444,0.0034465985,0.00005260961,0.00011589385,0.003379307,0.00015187655,0.00012661595,0.17887457,0.7169204,0.096283585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080177946,0.000023990224,0.0018225103,0.0045619565,0.00005448667,0.00009683951,0.0023345568,0.00008355638,0.00026546718,0.059009477,0.9316306,0.000036337886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016896844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028940253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016896844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023375554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069891857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033596992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377092508","doi":"10.1080/01916599.2023.2214911","title":"Philosophy as Stranger Wisdom: A Leo Strauss Intellectual Biography","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of European Ideas","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.0831944663195488,"score_gpt":0.23605873490924212,"score_spread":0.15286426858969332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377092508","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017002178,0.09685927,0.009176782,0.56061256,0.00719989,0.000031569565,0.00008937901,0.00012200863,0.30890635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66549844,0.050230667,0.004992349,0.110871136,0.014022068,0.00009606701,0.00006757406,0.00027437633,0.15394734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876344,0.000520028,0.000035901783,0.00020479067,0.00033788933,0.00013785009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811757,0.001106258,0.00009296612,0.000107394895,0.00034588308,0.0002299885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022173,0.00033210398,0.00046378843,0.0016450367,0.0048828935,0.0056213397,0.0007911703,0.0026121929,0.002301519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004358368,0.00020188809,0.00023713101,0.00097443885,0.019685125,0.006017478,0.0027326387,0.007591181,0.0010341854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012140689,0.000017724928,0.00021141524,0.000051651074,0.0000046925056,0.00006845717,0.009287132,0.00020345883,0.0000872414,0.89781004,0.07842304,0.013822948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007189304,0.000014435345,0.0003266892,0.0002459415,0.0000026927926,0.00014654903,0.0023365044,0.0005020399,0.00009670037,0.32275048,0.6735554,0.000015458283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01349316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011185328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01349316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076983855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043668165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05585599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378837385","doi":"10.21827/jss.2.1.38201","title":"External Conditions, Internal Rationality: Spinoza on the Rationality of Seneca’s Suicide","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Spinoza Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Injustice; Epistemology; Reading (process); Individualism; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.25088626387791335,"score_gpt":0.3807092488971166,"score_spread":0.12982298501920325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378837385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086119965,0.005964821,0.017093545,0.06331735,0.00039557062,0.00004568376,0.000060217684,0.000057464495,0.82694536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98222315,0.0011311622,0.0014607812,0.0017172727,0.0000843527,0.000032159365,0.0000142918525,0.000023243274,0.013313668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997726,0.0013260527,0.000082949155,0.00021220343,0.00029411336,0.00035873268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983728,0.0008435945,0.00018810415,0.0001795332,0.0002806991,0.00013518393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028081601,0.0004225383,0.00043650207,0.001200189,0.0060156784,0.0056562144,0.0008032875,0.0027189457,0.003235294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003682772,0.0002052694,0.0005952269,0.00077527686,0.04176911,0.004191091,0.0036310889,0.004444285,0.0003490414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034838329,0.0000032715911,0.000088074936,0.0000079100255,0.0000019887593,0.000035274166,0.0019616515,0.00010608445,0.000008292386,0.99642795,0.0006808224,0.0006752386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015780633,0.000007722219,0.00024496115,0.00009179257,0.000008281778,0.00009056669,0.0038167054,0.00049701973,0.00008954656,0.9576558,0.0374679,0.000013919827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016150456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014244544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016150456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068371305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039007212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049607098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378838785","doi":"10.21827/jss.2.1.38195","title":"The Desiring Constitutions of Community: A two-fold reading of Spinoza’s social philosophy in the Ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Spinoza Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Rationality; Ambivalence; Sociology; Friendship; Harmony (color); Reading (process); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Social science; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.49418455722322707,"score_gpt":0.4300825674678299,"score_spread":0.06410198975539716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378838785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07511595,0.008118482,0.06335842,0.1394598,0.001044512,0.00009074622,0.000073735086,0.00009880413,0.71263963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676925,0.0008854611,0.0060506617,0.006158484,0.00042178357,0.00011123676,0.00001810236,0.000054838743,0.018607061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955844,0.0030479627,0.00006824622,0.0003520203,0.00055742526,0.00038993737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985728,0.0006685919,0.00011498587,0.00019595155,0.00017517175,0.00027242932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037605392,0.00049750315,0.00042930932,0.002110452,0.008295583,0.010090415,0.000895497,0.00392602,0.0026673286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025602693,0.00023976387,0.00046511242,0.0010068892,0.05150735,0.009655441,0.0050303657,0.0049813995,0.00036987264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024290669,0.000005265778,0.00003321764,0.0000045748775,5.6085906e-7,0.000014315615,0.003934224,0.000032200278,0.000026013811,0.99458355,0.000654687,0.0007090002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010659307,0.000008850995,0.00015559014,0.000035246856,0.0000021140893,0.000042794065,0.0036432429,0.000312175,0.000054630822,0.957047,0.038681015,0.0000065402646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006473115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058039017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010090415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066762636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035439392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04843986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381623902","doi":"10.1017/9781009273497.003","title":"Faith","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Politics; Secularization; Aphra; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Religious studies; Literature; Theology; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.05291678805227602,"score_gpt":0.19730694428539203,"score_spread":0.14439015623311602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381623902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054753874,0.011177841,0.0071054674,0.024064617,0.0025950633,0.000037127287,0.00009232168,0.00012847774,0.9493236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39562765,0.0061852364,0.0043821135,0.013681392,0.0018619541,0.000100890786,0.00018678846,0.0003209415,0.577653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984724,0.0008732553,0.00003455106,0.00016630947,0.0003085455,0.00014500997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990584,0.00048820008,0.000056689714,0.00016091808,0.00015685451,0.00007886568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230148,0.0004924428,0.00022941241,0.0009922014,0.003638959,0.0063597006,0.0006142366,0.002031948,0.019770266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004082754,0.00016390157,0.0002724599,0.00066731795,0.016362729,0.006988117,0.0027531898,0.0031197385,0.0047198897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092213795,0.000006726102,0.00007427936,0.000040518546,0.0000017862453,0.000040101255,0.008362874,0.000035351386,0.00009933754,0.9298711,0.046374418,0.015084258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036048448,0.000010872492,0.00016739947,0.00016529212,0.000002003213,0.000114872164,0.004238872,0.0000821024,0.00029169046,0.11410972,0.88080686,0.000006834272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002646284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036655106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019770266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031970553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001918758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383426518","doi":"10.7202/1100789ar","title":"Remarques sur la réponse de Leo Strauss au problème de l’historicisme","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.2038204581310446,"score_gpt":0.33975833011998186,"score_spread":0.13593787198893725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383426518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011386611,0.031366084,0.00567281,0.792691,0.0106856115,0.000015019857,0.00010500465,0.000050143935,0.14802767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6159122,0.02903007,0.005945053,0.12900023,0.024996914,0.00012856533,0.00014081261,0.0004893353,0.19435689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588484,0.0019802237,0.0001400692,0.00048785252,0.0010973318,0.00040962626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864972,0.009673099,0.0006536956,0.0008053762,0.0018331388,0.0005374549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007905769,0.00062462623,0.00092830916,0.0027742733,0.008353867,0.008513805,0.0015672393,0.006469979,0.012751778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025672914,0.0003616645,0.00043908844,0.002890503,0.028579649,0.012651696,0.00440173,0.01392897,0.0018339955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014812881,0.00000639504,0.00010158656,0.000030549123,0.0000049555083,0.000029503268,0.004086188,0.000087811175,0.000030153733,0.95748365,0.034069035,0.0040554004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001994356,0.00000780902,0.0003310829,0.00023438726,0.0000066694724,0.000070750844,0.0045253453,0.0003326924,0.00014607595,0.519913,0.47439125,0.000020886146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024383299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033381283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024383299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007596344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006259557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05511558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383896281","doi":"10.33137/rr.v45i4.41404","title":"Hankins, James. Virtue Politics: Soulcraft and Statecraft in Renaissance Italy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; The Renaissance; Politics; Political science; Art; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.02857614279266839,"score_gpt":0.2492368118731241,"score_spread":0.2206606690804557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383896281","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007791456,0.46836922,0.0013121025,0.18020812,0.0048794225,0.000051667776,0.0002566768,0.00007085198,0.33706048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44386208,0.29137552,0.0017807209,0.043504708,0.0108704725,0.00020589154,0.00021893746,0.00015545482,0.20802623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946624,0.000261203,0.00002444294,0.000066110086,0.00011370682,0.00006831801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999097,0.0005995593,0.00010142381,0.000036780875,0.00007751998,0.00008772663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000966787,0.00075130386,0.0003065752,0.0023677521,0.004619555,0.005995605,0.00079518795,0.0035956674,0.00734767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013593362,0.00046033727,0.00022548619,0.003069545,0.011005679,0.006627776,0.0015908881,0.0043904227,0.001507638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028440558,0.000039692328,0.0010776062,0.0002641353,0.000010353217,0.00029172446,0.063677564,0.000103251994,0.00007959134,0.53415745,0.35465506,0.04561516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126960085,0.000011170634,0.004551887,0.000602047,0.000006783601,0.00015741219,0.012006386,0.000034935292,0.00007975831,0.047861278,0.93466395,0.000011688149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036791764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08616706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036791764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005874978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026627558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073155224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385760230","doi":"10.5325/miltonstudies.65.2.0252","title":"Milton and the Uses of Stupidity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Milton Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Stupidity; Innocence; Skepticism; Wonder; Relation (database); Criticism; Philosophy; Face (sociological concept); Agency (philosophy); Aesthetics; Literature; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.21037807040689216,"score_gpt":0.3296074011383439,"score_spread":0.11922933073145175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385760230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19377473,0.0068232124,0.0061238,0.05806596,0.0010127475,0.00002578785,0.000020135589,0.00010502611,0.7340485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902345,0.0003500724,0.00017158392,0.0012119225,0.00009601195,0.000008723694,0.0000019636393,0.000019343106,0.0079059005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928398,0.0054732175,0.000118921664,0.00038219435,0.000843624,0.0003422144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900474,0.007713599,0.0006556106,0.0006653242,0.0005653709,0.0003528187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00550277,0.00066218886,0.00038601118,0.0018493598,0.012865044,0.010908201,0.0010624627,0.0034891148,0.003201036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011654241,0.00033631304,0.00022027573,0.00070022384,0.07751851,0.00698258,0.0073055816,0.005483345,0.00037136296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024489558,0.000009818762,0.0003212068,0.000044637545,0.000005715649,0.0002523257,0.13035478,0.00007825203,0.00020682262,0.8616349,0.0042000716,0.0028668426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031288942,0.00008107309,0.0012841887,0.000745245,0.000020598805,0.0009033045,0.14447416,0.00080429256,0.0017023287,0.44658625,0.40330482,0.00006250473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021332288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002613428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012865044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006342259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014824513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046016574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386617352","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000171","title":"Anna Tomaszewska, Kant’s Rational Religion and the Radical Enlightenment: From Spinoza to Contemporary Debates New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022 Pp. 226 ISBN 9781350195844 (hbk) $143.95","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Theology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07899308699770027,"score_gpt":0.28090221415012656,"score_spread":0.2019091271524263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386617352","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002457725,0.98423046,0.00035430855,0.008912456,0.0008685856,0.0000021289868,0.000028881424,0.000008543563,0.0053488663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013461092,0.9718518,0.00044031165,0.0017738892,0.0015541739,0.000016825552,0.000061888684,0.00002573378,0.010814249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907434,0.00043202276,0.00005419009,0.000095822885,0.0002779041,0.0000656883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.00080694107,0.00015963003,0.00006697797,0.00017500139,0.00008070207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016318223,0.00090000447,0.00066315045,0.0028459595,0.0012594056,0.004199571,0.00074859627,0.0016716827,0.007601897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002753051,0.00054190186,0.00029329368,0.003938517,0.004062022,0.006572084,0.0015381419,0.0031400523,0.0032016311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017495804,0.0000363538,0.0004315945,0.0035833337,0.00007961206,0.00018424772,0.0035323275,0.0003550159,0.0004543014,0.32645053,0.4965641,0.16815372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017224307,0.000015566979,0.0020359138,0.0027925833,0.000032273347,0.00025513902,0.001387829,0.000094740826,0.00030197427,0.15072377,0.8423187,0.000024285995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039548175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008512366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007601897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002171589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034855918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025430858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386764286","doi":"10.26443/arc.v34i.637","title":"On Obedience in Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obedience; Politics; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0381777936722948,"score_gpt":0.27418167403746474,"score_spread":0.23600388036516995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386764286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026697848,0.019011162,0.0052371994,0.105076134,0.0022726858,0.000029532566,0.000049866518,0.00003275017,0.8415928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8849212,0.0051343576,0.0012158502,0.027123142,0.001214921,0.000097319775,0.000040323175,0.000065776236,0.08018702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963133,0.0016965629,0.00011249565,0.0004185963,0.00062544324,0.00083360146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989587,0.0006212523,0.00010334149,0.000092880546,0.00013168874,0.00009208491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038259337,0.00045475096,0.0004139397,0.001080517,0.015758988,0.011645671,0.0006976922,0.0046306215,0.002705726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042090495,0.00020960992,0.00041539915,0.0015263197,0.027150666,0.0052377535,0.0034119813,0.010748652,0.00034673125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003850659,0.0000037473374,0.00003731498,0.0000047643434,6.9783334e-7,0.000013342296,0.0018669115,0.000021864,0.0000135007185,0.99441373,0.0023628,0.0012573329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001546493,0.0000147169085,0.0005462958,0.00021108983,0.000008295427,0.00003352303,0.0033950259,0.00012986927,0.0001798615,0.5707673,0.42467648,0.000022028844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03535493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039816648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03535493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009605351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075174086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070298314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386765299","doi":"10.26443/arc.v38i.480","title":"Pannenberg on Spinoza’s Theory of Miracles: A Misunderstood Parallel?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.055256796307722254,"score_gpt":0.2776423918725619,"score_spread":0.22238559556483964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386765299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021709198,0.014724836,0.028131407,0.21306074,0.0030884792,0.00004368624,0.00015386535,0.00009156964,0.7189962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8567604,0.0062345196,0.011764343,0.026781537,0.0024634302,0.00018416916,0.00007754259,0.0002459389,0.09548803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891746,0.0005223249,0.00003401038,0.00023269419,0.00016462215,0.00012894862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988864,0.0006713147,0.00008388778,0.00013881037,0.00015489802,0.00006477198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022037462,0.0004900152,0.0006158298,0.001324324,0.0050903144,0.0061613545,0.0011490833,0.0041273325,0.008838867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049595055,0.00030075712,0.00043357527,0.0016217999,0.022010906,0.012161907,0.0032029382,0.0059027444,0.0011523586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003217093,0.0000017538771,0.000021676286,0.0000049696046,8.199962e-7,0.000008381807,0.0007356412,0.000013790209,0.0000066054426,0.9960078,0.0024960842,0.00069910975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008609578,0.0000026950745,0.00007283183,0.000038896796,0.0000024901178,0.000023677007,0.000667578,0.00010055758,0.00003286572,0.9538379,0.04520606,0.0000058770875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053569837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069058947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008838867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030757906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024137935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02956891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387128081","doi":"10.1086/scj5204131","title":":<i>Subjects of Advice: Drama and Counsel from More to Shakespeare</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sixteenth Century Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Advice (programming); Download; Law; History; Political science; Library science; Art; Media studies; Sociology; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.019485256267357205,"score_gpt":0.24479336582985875,"score_spread":0.22530810956250155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387128081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040802686,0.0124714095,0.0008073583,0.28610128,0.018533647,0.00003924135,0.00026962894,0.00011339387,0.6775839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07486662,0.0042977836,0.00058399484,0.10553542,0.0067234095,0.00008476698,0.00018791316,0.00044908622,0.807271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982961,0.0005402339,0.000080680715,0.00019754707,0.0004945919,0.00039083033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821126,0.00087096496,0.00009280157,0.00008240619,0.0004376675,0.00030487723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016366957,0.00054926187,0.000344713,0.0012517071,0.013942495,0.010194888,0.0009639458,0.0055662706,0.040000014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058263396,0.00031260093,0.00023809569,0.0017743212,0.0077977423,0.007635371,0.0032921832,0.00952559,0.00824696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011066402,0.000011660649,0.0001521846,0.00007586279,0.0000023774353,0.00005797755,0.023017496,0.000008821869,0.00010845337,0.1594423,0.8079813,0.009130461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030313736,0.0000033206084,0.0004605032,0.00015651435,0.000002359308,0.00004483061,0.0098145725,0.000011102049,0.00008429678,0.0042700204,0.9851423,0.000007187311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071369775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18402761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071369775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062126606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067268526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1419087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387183457","doi":"10.1163/18750257-bja10062","title":"Civilization and Its Others: American Imaginaries, State of Nature, and Civility in Hobbes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hobbes Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Social contract; Sociology; Civilization; Privilege (computing); Racism; Politics; Law; Colonialism; State (computer science); Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.0564986990626612,"score_gpt":0.3103405616053811,"score_spread":0.2538418625427199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387183457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15678869,0.010314162,0.0036412477,0.03342002,0.0007667313,0.000017997412,0.000018983728,0.000026033218,0.7950062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98876697,0.0011440368,0.00029282895,0.0010386351,0.00020172437,0.000008913918,0.0000052919595,0.00001544342,0.008526255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975337,0.0018565041,0.00003172494,0.00015180095,0.00020763355,0.00021862546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976407,0.001664639,0.00010051554,0.00013848039,0.00017008626,0.00028562074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045591984,0.00037649178,0.00031490778,0.0018260187,0.012859848,0.009638963,0.0005214914,0.0024470855,0.002602825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028451032,0.00023019176,0.00013279125,0.0012132146,0.06082492,0.005138604,0.0029980468,0.0038970767,0.00023457086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009027841,0.00001363578,0.00011770577,0.000009294485,9.90922e-7,0.000036425245,0.10890538,0.00003509291,0.000063426574,0.88724023,0.0015931561,0.0019756912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010950651,0.000026511154,0.0011634507,0.00021252019,0.000006050517,0.000108767905,0.12375276,0.00038602742,0.00027966828,0.54733115,0.32670012,0.000022012335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01168316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016574506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012859848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054205875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001694738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03932923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387735195","doi":"10.32725/oph.2023.006","title":"Was early modern natural law secularized? The current debates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Opera Historica","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Historical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Natural law; Humanism; Natural (archaeology); Law; Theocracy; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.04360705431452667,"score_gpt":0.2503163815119451,"score_spread":0.2067093271974184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387735195","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046115447,0.4388892,0.0022048063,0.32818046,0.0029694147,0.000013331193,0.00015950596,0.000038762868,0.18142906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7369988,0.20128539,0.0009979887,0.039934665,0.008240874,0.000035885165,0.00014670771,0.000047291687,0.012312385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787986,0.00091815385,0.0000624643,0.0004872276,0.00036367876,0.0002887196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996711,0.0021124138,0.00037884054,0.000244178,0.00033944752,0.00021410547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048076347,0.0002395114,0.0004211879,0.0012664697,0.0025967774,0.008494969,0.0010681837,0.0037855061,0.0073506404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004676821,0.00019908117,0.00021041188,0.002405877,0.027558066,0.011708869,0.0018569106,0.00448104,0.00071673153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016529422,0.000025326399,0.00044028944,0.0002611932,0.0000063265898,0.000036386533,0.0049451715,0.000084110565,0.00007030477,0.9462987,0.008009836,0.039805748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008415239,0.000023190987,0.003387319,0.0020321703,0.000008687344,0.0001366691,0.013465358,0.00019101262,0.00013083074,0.5228165,0.4577783,0.000021563872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030696748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027963119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008494969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058543244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042016455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042476296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388124794","doi":"10.24124/c677/2010144","title":"Justice as Economics in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Polity; Politics; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.11596337369805337,"score_gpt":0.34921244587647954,"score_spread":0.23324907217842616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388124794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027432704,0.025203776,0.027379261,0.07367609,0.0008591368,0.000045006556,0.000052348118,0.00003834654,0.8453133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92375,0.007104188,0.008491891,0.008762568,0.0010145537,0.00013975074,0.000021203108,0.000036550573,0.05067929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962358,0.002279596,0.00007704275,0.00027452855,0.00074676354,0.00038626036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988532,0.00072505185,0.000065199616,0.00009357743,0.0001912314,0.00007163495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004374145,0.00036249953,0.00050765957,0.001727513,0.006574915,0.0052124974,0.0006341536,0.004248537,0.0017612333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038576957,0.0002245752,0.00027315985,0.0012700689,0.033929262,0.0052141123,0.002122442,0.0035713695,0.00034169972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001231168,0.000001068652,0.000012994992,0.000002502144,3.5636359e-7,0.000007084342,0.0003906654,0.000052782725,0.0000052760506,0.99854064,0.00044260276,0.0005427803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004019227,0.000002752626,0.00008052388,0.00002637507,9.888195e-7,0.000012724968,0.00027009228,0.00016479327,0.000025245512,0.9595538,0.039854407,0.0000043393065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026107669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022365974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026107669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011840918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057094116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08591235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388222785","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0002","title":"Moral Theory","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moral obligation; Obligation; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Philosophy; Internalism and externalism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07012798883926831,"score_gpt":0.2258935994849091,"score_spread":0.15576561064564082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388222785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013663522,0.0063490816,0.012213061,0.015794426,0.0005678147,0.000026596761,0.00013328447,0.00004622188,0.9635031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46155918,0.010157629,0.011429611,0.009838724,0.0020015915,0.00023985289,0.0006061381,0.00016215388,0.5040051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851066,0.00076630624,0.00004163165,0.0002322317,0.00032759825,0.000121574754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899155,0.00043329343,0.000058344383,0.0001407697,0.00026986326,0.000106132145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013614233,0.00059580273,0.00040209616,0.00135505,0.0026413903,0.0050677294,0.0010086856,0.0023866347,0.036538187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024809334,0.00019100631,0.00037670988,0.0008814268,0.00947421,0.0039004323,0.0014921885,0.004079922,0.0055999826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010587007,0.0000037547659,0.000016711903,0.000011341557,8.717226e-7,0.0000075970406,0.0001739301,0.000081091915,0.00001015364,0.9887084,0.00871323,0.002271924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003605192,0.000004106655,0.00007590835,0.000100189085,0.0000014881123,0.00003249321,0.00028430173,0.00025296435,0.00003092474,0.7954051,0.20380639,0.0000025101108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030842447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017392178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036538187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005956499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021160215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12223238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254364","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0003","title":"Initial Theory of Sovereignty","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Presentation (obstetrics); Sovereignty; Interpretation (philosophy); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Wish; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Linguistics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07719287521983392,"score_gpt":0.24749479886171827,"score_spread":0.17030192364188435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009425988,0.0025558353,0.03839421,0.008855217,0.0003749179,0.00003585836,0.00016628623,0.0000477794,0.940144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.855291,0.002850506,0.009174401,0.0023593593,0.0011803671,0.00021599961,0.000332855,0.000092373484,0.12850319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791104,0.0008541483,0.00008874672,0.00042524084,0.00045278977,0.00026806907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978217,0.0010466767,0.00010739225,0.0003335159,0.0005217347,0.00016905794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027494482,0.00047971017,0.0006663872,0.0016172556,0.003497928,0.006032364,0.0015548755,0.0027917137,0.024231972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051748725,0.00032063405,0.0008327306,0.0011986953,0.017559048,0.009677946,0.0036499472,0.005825138,0.0024433625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9829334e-7,0.000001015883,0.000008435217,0.0000039112683,4.3914778e-7,0.0000037562575,0.00006569263,0.000044725184,0.000006418301,0.99917346,0.0003938507,0.0002974061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036769877,0.000003296917,0.00005240524,0.000028350209,0.0000020697005,0.00001970205,0.00006515354,0.00040573758,0.00002628129,0.98372275,0.015668325,0.0000022434422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027941242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018380552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024231972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057428936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023879383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081064045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254680","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.001.0001","title":"The Logic of Leviathan","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); AND gate; Politics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science; Computer security; Algorithm; Logic gate; Law","score_opus":0.058577292024722574,"score_gpt":0.23969298507718242,"score_spread":0.18111569305245984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013112836,0.004955464,0.020509142,0.054708328,0.0010116162,0.000026581232,0.000109547,0.00007852832,0.90548795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86182535,0.0013705925,0.005033878,0.009459221,0.0016557035,0.00014407605,0.000054784912,0.00014556725,0.12031076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964669,0.002124939,0.00007931497,0.00040718756,0.0005595445,0.0003620876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981165,0.0011197363,0.00010652642,0.0001881294,0.00036569725,0.00010354466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034109794,0.00043261892,0.000680916,0.001350668,0.00541617,0.0067281337,0.0010665464,0.0030267886,0.00855446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052867024,0.00037783166,0.000519679,0.0010354285,0.023086995,0.0057196175,0.0025542767,0.005831388,0.0012382488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002027065,0.000001712618,0.0000072924836,0.0000026895304,7.6394224e-7,0.000004086911,0.00017178492,0.000021842794,0.000008943318,0.9982558,0.0011939639,0.0003291218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005271806,0.0000030744363,0.000018924631,0.000018647906,0.000002073571,0.000008410498,0.00014558817,0.00014291187,0.00004365284,0.9720321,0.027575267,0.0000038654634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006831696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051699206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008821493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008821493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003096198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06400466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254689","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0004","title":"Theory of Authorization","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Doctrine; Authorization; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security; Linguistics","score_opus":0.061659602052528524,"score_gpt":0.2306996226420428,"score_spread":0.16904002058951428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006676446,0.0020818727,0.10808128,0.011331101,0.000477674,0.00010353672,0.00038221592,0.00016070652,0.8707052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80760014,0.0030929507,0.024510583,0.0034007651,0.0018542666,0.0004237947,0.0006361262,0.00017591828,0.15830547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953597,0.0019229607,0.00025371622,0.0007553662,0.0011811246,0.0005271109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952952,0.0022803093,0.00026873147,0.0007338394,0.001076937,0.00034489186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004201366,0.0007751029,0.00081590074,0.0023806612,0.003606023,0.0078119,0.0022599064,0.0039880313,0.029040886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006056916,0.0004812392,0.0010287346,0.0019938508,0.016709944,0.015889054,0.003665058,0.0054514953,0.0044135503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.40965e-7,0.0000012417992,0.000007824087,0.000004147403,4.1426733e-7,0.000005944916,0.000033816385,0.000055417393,0.0000047929598,0.99906796,0.00052811386,0.00028967383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000418478,0.0000023420778,0.000019100582,0.000016709597,0.0000014938179,0.000021077554,0.000049319697,0.00058412016,0.00002049776,0.98367035,0.01560818,0.0000025552279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035112982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001957996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029040886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005595332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032520061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0971514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254788","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198243359.003.0005","title":"God","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Theism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06018809159784003,"score_gpt":0.22081015494677844,"score_spread":0.16062206334893842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037081565,0.004129625,0.0064593423,0.004317174,0.00075085764,0.000019190946,0.00009775931,0.000041330662,0.9804765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38586816,0.007063963,0.0060492344,0.0033944894,0.0011361216,0.00009538811,0.00035737548,0.0001610329,0.59587425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994186,0.00025232206,0.000017767683,0.00010092685,0.0001634609,0.000046919587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997271,0.00008968513,0.00001793246,0.00004331553,0.000094426476,0.000027656924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057240203,0.0003755431,0.0002628526,0.00075695995,0.002031797,0.003035544,0.0003912165,0.0007467477,0.01666815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094323274,0.00013364424,0.00017718047,0.00061432115,0.006763108,0.0027740626,0.001246445,0.002174101,0.0036321227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033344925,0.0000030910505,0.000034436212,0.000019403022,8.665705e-7,0.000013526685,0.0008567917,0.00004122049,0.000053164258,0.9859028,0.008418079,0.0046533495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003993593,0.00001190753,0.00020177937,0.00010980224,0.00000223969,0.00008344302,0.00081598613,0.00015561223,0.00023551576,0.2683696,0.73000526,0.0000048139227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024761518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002485177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01666815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019370948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010376108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750843","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32743-8_1","title":"Truth, Power, and Life","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Obedience; Modernity; Faith; Autocracy; Physis; Power (physics); Philosophy; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Period (music); Aesthetics; Law; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.07847466045037677,"score_gpt":0.23988705908808264,"score_spread":0.16141239863770587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032901966,0.019331167,0.0016149563,0.012761554,0.00050747115,0.00001056453,0.000047665253,0.000017802746,0.9624186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58887655,0.014683199,0.001782014,0.0037218686,0.0015896625,0.00007544238,0.00009641261,0.00005761289,0.38911724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993261,0.00032731905,0.000020042098,0.00007392928,0.00016226848,0.00009044134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.0008047238,0.000050237668,0.00008484372,0.00009099999,0.00006807535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00135459,0.00039407623,0.00034141153,0.0009369008,0.0042044614,0.00795835,0.00057087315,0.0022381884,0.012537338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002642917,0.00023395997,0.00016762924,0.0011723338,0.028274972,0.005549754,0.0015651463,0.0034896468,0.001524454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027473898,0.000003243208,0.000021596547,0.000008347383,5.4244174e-7,0.000008669927,0.0012617864,0.000027474018,0.000011122007,0.9919001,0.0044186194,0.0023359207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005290362,0.0000037159423,0.00012712729,0.00008462343,0.0000012166334,0.000024835008,0.0016603919,0.000071378694,0.000046737998,0.84636766,0.15160382,0.0000031740158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006030546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009589889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012537338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040612677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030976715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041941524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750923","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32743-8_4","title":"Justice, the Laws of Nature, and God","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Courage; Ethical egoism; Economic Justice; Moral courage; Virtue; Philosophy; Natural law; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.08678379807955285,"score_gpt":0.2724552656308807,"score_spread":0.18567146755132785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008631471,0.021244755,0.003606678,0.031056788,0.0010626838,0.000025265359,0.000058782727,0.000025671945,0.93428785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7147242,0.009329123,0.0023503308,0.01005634,0.0015104951,0.000112934176,0.000048994258,0.000060452367,0.26180714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982816,0.0007873252,0.000052653715,0.00021492131,0.00036550316,0.00029814293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837,0.0010644261,0.000111703404,0.00017632,0.00017448099,0.000103076694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024623626,0.00032894374,0.000528757,0.00093543757,0.0070407456,0.0065772384,0.0007815209,0.003709774,0.0052160244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004057071,0.00028831218,0.00032685557,0.0011770737,0.04071325,0.0054775914,0.0023360604,0.0057304204,0.0005591367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002277272,0.0000032590315,0.000021148766,0.0000061817245,5.310059e-7,0.000008307329,0.00083886686,0.000022854536,0.000007773796,0.9958169,0.002252765,0.0010191922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006285924,0.0000048617467,0.00016391654,0.00006375692,0.0000020384748,0.000028220144,0.0011027976,0.00007203354,0.000044170287,0.88173056,0.11677678,0.0000046814303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015631648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029121319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015631648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005094136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058147637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03696078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388750925","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32743-8_3","title":"Self-interest and the Sovereign","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Courage; Sovereignty; Framing (construction); Doctrine; Politics; Law; Political science; Prosperity; Power (physics); Ethical egoism; State (computer science); Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.09093679368775844,"score_gpt":0.23449075967647023,"score_spread":0.14355396598871178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388750925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087962,0.008406101,0.0026922275,0.011186229,0.00033917048,0.000015671112,0.000026037234,0.000013956799,0.96852434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71753746,0.004218798,0.0013678992,0.00480509,0.00079087156,0.00008810243,0.000040824743,0.000059045477,0.27109188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874413,0.00061245513,0.000030806856,0.00019610145,0.00020122551,0.00021519074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992138,0.00046787312,0.000052587715,0.00010251681,0.00009380882,0.00006940334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023794896,0.0004137533,0.00045175722,0.0007761998,0.004195292,0.007985105,0.00080771174,0.0043714875,0.006669481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027626585,0.0003351619,0.00026957836,0.0010642953,0.031498484,0.0072858077,0.0025642822,0.007531132,0.00088986295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012295949,0.0000017595222,0.000008174657,0.0000017950077,2.6054974e-7,0.0000044434373,0.00046373488,0.000012290539,0.0000060731973,0.99843913,0.00064961426,0.00041150645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008540504,0.000004699856,0.00007490332,0.000041366333,0.0000014073829,0.000022239381,0.0005806654,0.00008751283,0.00004950727,0.92378235,0.07534329,0.000003445996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007315815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009355254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007985105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005326245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004194013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03864479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388756295","doi":"10.3998/ergo.4630","title":"The Affirmative Mind: Spinoza on Striving under the Attribute of Thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Equivocation; Construals; Epistemology; Negation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Philosophy; Psychology; Construal level theory; Social psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.22702362947340227,"score_gpt":0.403966391006737,"score_spread":0.1769427615333347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388756295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09509823,0.010501703,0.1234786,0.08002242,0.0016772082,0.00007121961,0.00018753187,0.00023398425,0.68872917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97333443,0.0012668325,0.009177079,0.0038460284,0.00040403687,0.00006692417,0.000031158743,0.000075341086,0.011798244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749494,0.0012878662,0.00008837432,0.00043419743,0.00040103658,0.00029355127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980977,0.00091531157,0.00020063322,0.00029488927,0.00026360017,0.00022793318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031795593,0.00047635945,0.00042696443,0.0015106932,0.0051391674,0.00797546,0.00076879794,0.0027689398,0.0033005804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003163001,0.0002534015,0.0006932545,0.00093023496,0.038130026,0.010332315,0.0037582908,0.004824183,0.00064969173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007764815,0.000003683473,0.000098680524,0.00000745861,0.0000015534962,0.000019902795,0.0014900891,0.00002506647,0.00003161319,0.9967489,0.00044513933,0.0011200593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073993792,0.000008638402,0.00019714251,0.000030320647,0.0000048865045,0.000043074604,0.00093046785,0.00017299043,0.00008126842,0.9817879,0.016728844,0.0000069784787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004947953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003989928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00797546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004731844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027007472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034332156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388932170","doi":"10.1017/pli.2023.35","title":"Edward Said and Philosophy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Direct and indirect realism; Ignorance; Ideology; Philosophy; Marxist philosophy; Realism; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0531842956303757,"score_gpt":0.2766983692449525,"score_spread":0.2235140736145768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388932170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015928628,0.07343468,0.0044156336,0.24673025,0.0035492172,0.000018689294,0.00006027917,0.000052641804,0.65580994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8265147,0.020486288,0.0017281437,0.02474268,0.0021917014,0.0000488501,0.000032728225,0.000076648,0.12417832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825245,0.0011231751,0.000051213116,0.00015796775,0.00024827916,0.00016699781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980811,0.001355144,0.00009978277,0.00011552638,0.00019382265,0.0001546604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014241367,0.00026376214,0.00027929986,0.00092333806,0.0045707435,0.004474491,0.00054061133,0.0023171008,0.0053838193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002550022,0.00013677722,0.00018181847,0.00066602754,0.022459315,0.0033412252,0.0026707659,0.0052139712,0.00080511364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011376308,0.0000045217835,0.00011235458,0.00005882943,0.0000021001192,0.00008405474,0.008844358,0.0000832644,0.000057673475,0.9672945,0.018386547,0.0050604595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051421334,0.000008149755,0.00018191292,0.0002641528,0.0000024584242,0.00015487088,0.0066153375,0.000105133025,0.00013587005,0.28801534,0.7045044,0.0000072883854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063736397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005259001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008192593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008192593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027706062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059441745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389397078","doi":"10.1017/s0012217323000409","title":"Spinoza's Early Modern Eudaimonism: Corporeal and Intellectual Flourishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Happiness; Intellectualism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Eudaimonia; Hierarchy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06524712954674497,"score_gpt":0.24285655348145302,"score_spread":0.17760942393470805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389397078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27683797,0.010199177,0.0063977083,0.016006213,0.00034158482,0.00001909083,0.000026887054,0.000034074328,0.6901373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234253,0.00049790775,0.00037535277,0.0002282162,0.000026076668,0.0000037372185,0.0000028604638,0.0000048553366,0.0065185125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920183,0.00036539938,0.000025980657,0.00012806922,0.000120768345,0.00015801202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951804,0.00022853677,0.000058314592,0.000059397524,0.000070000344,0.00006586052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017060287,0.00022167158,0.00022990639,0.0010721658,0.004954575,0.0053916257,0.00024962373,0.0010259819,0.0026148912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014018794,0.00012447104,0.00012082476,0.0006721337,0.03461605,0.0032221198,0.0023431021,0.002588132,0.00017847386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018595058,0.000010120067,0.00021762031,0.000017401448,0.0000018827398,0.000071148555,0.016568277,0.00004772735,0.00020823204,0.9772019,0.00046530226,0.0051717856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034832305,0.0000615982,0.004430847,0.00020945133,0.000011879156,0.00039035172,0.027015846,0.00044679415,0.00086772785,0.7026838,0.26381487,0.000031957883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006699204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009867721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006699204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045563946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014211824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03305906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391158250","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2024.500101","title":"Poesis, God, and the Connectedness of All Beings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social connectedness; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06555000143239788,"score_gpt":0.29675495564625193,"score_spread":0.23120495421385406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391158250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112021945,0.029991949,0.010963608,0.037100088,0.0010957477,0.000030721665,0.000050421724,0.000054752512,0.8086908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830793,0.0030238102,0.0013677427,0.00072312093,0.0002156876,0.000018970239,0.000013633447,0.000017140732,0.011540567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808323,0.001387569,0.000033972414,0.00018817588,0.00021213431,0.000094877854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981026,0.0013949943,0.00012967105,0.00016636444,0.00010686896,0.000099514655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002497463,0.00030085605,0.00034376574,0.0020347123,0.00443534,0.00593645,0.0005122842,0.0013892422,0.0044196495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037809268,0.0001492216,0.0001490805,0.0014743109,0.07525319,0.008533891,0.0035969983,0.0028632542,0.00020676403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004335247,0.00000363158,0.000053654414,0.000010123169,9.819522e-7,0.000019344256,0.0068692025,0.000027560513,0.00001975376,0.9912145,0.00042388617,0.0013529727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009267674,0.000019640087,0.0005341681,0.00012793519,0.0000032613266,0.000092899245,0.014883829,0.0001533029,0.00012828276,0.8967026,0.08733767,0.0000070346036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030059742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002671396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00593645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038561784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015106644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027978718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391312761","doi":"10.33137/rr.v41i4.32474","title":"Letters and Papers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.017186248946453344,"score_gpt":0.20901136139119714,"score_spread":0.1918251124447438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391312761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030176302,0.018184124,0.0009738624,0.26134267,0.16432928,0.00013209353,0.0024016732,0.00027893257,0.5493397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0152705,0.0027818624,0.00030475025,0.01784071,0.02298398,0.00006332867,0.00031953974,0.00010351484,0.9403318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860185,0.0002004266,0.0000792839,0.0003561532,0.00054548454,0.00021686127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976248,0.0010103753,0.00010398278,0.00025694122,0.0007550677,0.00024885364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001048643,0.00043741942,0.0005529425,0.0009853232,0.003200934,0.00583462,0.000886015,0.005838649,0.12680028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00826429,0.00025874595,0.0005379233,0.0010638078,0.0013126569,0.0018175772,0.0011005276,0.005929214,0.054468703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006654052,0.00001568423,0.00019194737,0.00008166013,0.0000062688277,0.0001641531,0.000085555825,0.00004374138,0.00021138004,0.04496541,0.9402594,0.013908394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006030226,0.000004521973,0.00044495,0.000033775264,0.0000015127381,0.00003689958,0.00005275111,0.00002561369,0.00009161049,0.002592213,0.99670607,0.000003941924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065239766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009129644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12680028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037558686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026864049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4241892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391635714","doi":"10.4236/ojpp.2024.141010","title":"Protagoras’s Great Speech and the Republic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Politics; The Republic; Affect (linguistics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.06959725330586121,"score_gpt":0.2906074024379836,"score_spread":0.2210101491321224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391635714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12517162,0.0032391178,0.002528548,0.018550625,0.00035317268,0.000008944664,0.000041766503,0.00006110925,0.8500451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970571,0.00036139434,0.0002653723,0.00096780574,0.00007676668,0.0000066268362,0.000009198837,0.000016957098,0.02772493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940336,0.00031330704,0.000012611244,0.00009008659,0.00007353307,0.00010716162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969316,0.00016555672,0.000036075435,0.000046612124,0.000023844772,0.000034775392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006563538,0.00012731565,0.00012282358,0.0002611766,0.0028225847,0.002388694,0.0001607632,0.00076641876,0.0028260523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001023978,0.00008720312,0.000111229725,0.00023602956,0.009313484,0.0015270632,0.0017916892,0.0018246243,0.0004300462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017232875,0.0000031188263,0.00012717763,0.000012795287,9.979163e-7,0.00008062075,0.008028092,0.000052453972,0.00011911248,0.9856775,0.0029063523,0.0029745253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002478629,0.000035859848,0.0021548695,0.000090601745,0.0000071560717,0.000375882,0.0063574077,0.00025445485,0.0006677072,0.31471366,0.6753008,0.00001686911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020898967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036178124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028260523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017185222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071906415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012468815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391837877","doi":"10.33137/wij.v19i2.42669","title":"Buruma, Ian. Spinoza: Freedom’s Messiah. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 2024.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Messiah; Haven; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Theology; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.032923960932246484,"score_gpt":0.2522276510342824,"score_spread":0.21930369010203593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391837877","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015098324,0.9148084,0.000190809,0.035624452,0.005642044,0.0000059647978,0.00010033644,0.000022033677,0.043454956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013226261,0.6775039,0.0005132303,0.019137438,0.0066857887,0.00004532791,0.00018960045,0.00016778776,0.28253067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994324,0.0001748098,0.00003236479,0.00006616347,0.00022295381,0.00007124252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991436,0.0004698033,0.00006381949,0.00004259285,0.00018808158,0.00009202943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090862514,0.00079657056,0.00076711585,0.0022033113,0.0029181645,0.003689358,0.00085820525,0.0025245694,0.032295737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026536514,0.0007070198,0.00032760616,0.0035167432,0.0031333861,0.0065487325,0.0014641742,0.0047434657,0.0102863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018375988,0.0000061261385,0.00006428277,0.00027234215,0.0000043923856,0.000034585013,0.00068763306,0.000030369029,0.000037801103,0.032374762,0.91811293,0.0483564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025188585,0.0000025684872,0.00024069111,0.00044057533,0.0000021680148,0.00003979777,0.00024762223,0.000007990188,0.000017218592,0.005241493,0.99375385,0.000003458196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022721427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075533085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032295737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033816902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003924512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392154107","doi":"10.1086/729279","title":"Educating the Body Politic: How Hobbes’s Civil Science Strengthens and Constrains the Sovereign","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polity","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Body politic; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04647678468135601,"score_gpt":0.2745181958842246,"score_spread":0.22804141120286858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392154107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057997506,0.0035939242,0.014442405,0.05925678,0.00079550355,0.00002622178,0.000021281512,0.000059135044,0.8638072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96062523,0.0010558546,0.0014865793,0.004366502,0.0002547721,0.000031968793,0.000011812943,0.000082343264,0.03208482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962929,0.0024057804,0.000039597748,0.00038303254,0.00042475318,0.00045404627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854726,0.00092647964,0.00010329272,0.00014408563,0.0001229401,0.00015582283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046342625,0.00028907295,0.00029612702,0.0007950012,0.012660931,0.011244757,0.0006728813,0.0033478593,0.004725953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00512024,0.00027732833,0.00028306796,0.00067285344,0.057039753,0.008012108,0.004673047,0.0060167424,0.000977511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031881111,0.000003691455,0.000060555107,0.000004995934,5.664686e-7,0.00002965855,0.011403686,0.00004598831,0.000037763602,0.98613733,0.001145952,0.0011266659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002034066,0.000017739745,0.00044065868,0.00013919685,0.00000610154,0.00007187976,0.011123261,0.0004598583,0.000291784,0.7624829,0.22493082,0.000015502317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011760994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012878463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012660931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00729775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004440194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05294919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392550676","doi":"10.1080/01440357.2023.2274793","title":"Taking authorial liberties: Thomas Hobbes on the occasion of <i>Leviathan</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prose Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Law; Literature; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Art; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.19644858442083438,"score_gpt":0.30777474386968473,"score_spread":0.11132615944885035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392550676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16162829,0.029979734,0.004327533,0.11045585,0.002687821,0.000012371341,0.000035969555,0.000059685448,0.6908128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95372754,0.002458457,0.00040315554,0.0035301093,0.000776034,0.000011550865,0.000007814811,0.00006857619,0.039016657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745816,0.0017822604,0.000034158147,0.0001624379,0.00028935325,0.0002737024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814427,0.0012246593,0.00014347116,0.00011353768,0.00019114143,0.0001829778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030073365,0.0002436251,0.00026771906,0.0008284777,0.012846793,0.009626808,0.00057257223,0.0026208737,0.0027277248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036874623,0.00024272435,0.00014051977,0.0007113283,0.026769184,0.004635796,0.0027609565,0.0048176334,0.00061504584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021067512,0.000009299638,0.00021399146,0.000021008484,0.0000031642173,0.00022059189,0.1531323,0.0000336893,0.0002052626,0.83071965,0.011145634,0.0042742714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013958655,0.000033208144,0.00079884916,0.000427915,0.000010279734,0.00038706342,0.08367733,0.00018551681,0.0008789655,0.18419494,0.72935724,0.000034780933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007263613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015871549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012846793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047188844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018717189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03423804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393010428","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0534","title":"John Milton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046625814904987045,"score_gpt":0.260307133413318,"score_spread":0.21368131850833097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393010428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013220226,0.03388073,0.0012003365,0.03472023,0.024136664,0.00005330719,0.00039248538,0.00032378067,0.9039704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046157213,0.008442078,0.0005612957,0.0044804392,0.0011992992,0.000029092864,0.0001373214,0.00014070208,0.9803939],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919575,0.00008767457,0.000035133013,0.00022123834,0.00033906795,0.000121098376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991103,0.00010656427,0.000052464955,0.00006999928,0.00033487115,0.00032578607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005765208,0.00077112165,0.00036812943,0.0014998834,0.0038329584,0.005960509,0.00085007504,0.0018628086,0.23883909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027627726,0.0003065346,0.00023695112,0.0009960913,0.0012132637,0.0038287335,0.0031280362,0.002856519,0.10338186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015489657,0.00001197985,0.00012680236,0.00007634856,0.0000015987122,0.00007643475,0.00028115834,0.000023292081,0.00010831344,0.021548292,0.9254086,0.05232163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.9662236e-7,0.0000017907712,0.00005611964,0.000051375835,3.7629326e-7,0.000036076675,0.00007524757,0.00000629394,0.00003199364,0.00062083366,0.99911755,0.0000018326368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005607207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015662752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23883909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026329672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003487868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7989963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393940414","doi":"10.1515/9781580468909","title":"The Philosopher's English King","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Boydell and Brewer eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Literature; Classics; Art","score_opus":0.052157732735028065,"score_gpt":0.22520041029775065,"score_spread":0.17304267756272257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393940414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01136297,0.030833205,0.0031154705,0.13096713,0.005636269,0.000029286513,0.00011845676,0.00013517572,0.8178021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24391764,0.012841122,0.0015301164,0.027825003,0.0015839819,0.00003779298,0.00007453253,0.0001157116,0.7120741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991861,0.0002598264,0.000029833463,0.00010818674,0.00028598984,0.00013016252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948335,0.00020520564,0.000035537378,0.000053721185,0.00013950835,0.00008268041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074772973,0.00021079379,0.00023182697,0.0005394295,0.0034455277,0.003837187,0.00027234879,0.0014085994,0.013892369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024172396,0.0001729173,0.000121921104,0.0004867924,0.0055628982,0.003581097,0.0018160457,0.0032052577,0.00342891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016565964,0.000012868998,0.00040391833,0.00007552249,0.0000029330372,0.00019276704,0.008953709,0.000050722847,0.0002624886,0.76636356,0.198872,0.024792831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037224409,0.000007307297,0.00041380542,0.000093825634,0.0000014062024,0.00007718121,0.002486036,0.0000317681,0.00009583516,0.022164352,0.9746206,0.0000041785884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013481289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021758167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013892369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044663064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046474636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394724854","doi":"10.1017/s0075435824000157","title":"NATHAN GILBERT, MARGARET GRAVER &amp; SEAN McCONNELL (EDS), POWER AND PERSUASION IN CICERO'S PHILOSOPHY. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2023. Pp. ix + 268. <scp>isbn</scp> 9781009170338 (hbk), £85.00; 9781009170352 (ebook).","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Roman Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Cicero; Philosophy; Classics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0676942391168002,"score_gpt":0.25311557619743724,"score_spread":0.18542133708063704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394724854","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032374423,0.95700365,0.0005813655,0.013776803,0.0019604543,0.000011589481,0.00008270225,0.000037619095,0.026221996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007850058,0.91772944,0.0014564717,0.0020644115,0.0016557287,0.000043105047,0.00009975718,0.00006338594,0.06903767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993686,0.000223378,0.000041010084,0.00008404585,0.00022712798,0.000055981378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987091,0.0008378739,0.00011279153,0.00004926421,0.00016490961,0.0001261355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001458816,0.0014887049,0.0010951797,0.0026191403,0.0016341576,0.0039639757,0.0014825382,0.002822198,0.036455657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026506167,0.0009651281,0.00041508742,0.0033143533,0.002759098,0.0066848197,0.0012493661,0.0024269568,0.013737003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057895006,0.000032866436,0.00026569449,0.0015927122,0.00001608315,0.000102577476,0.0030708907,0.00014044861,0.000118371936,0.0230455,0.7540414,0.21751553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001138565,0.0000068250506,0.0010195277,0.0016245702,0.000012678314,0.00019065224,0.0014009359,0.00007914076,0.00009349459,0.011825116,0.98372513,0.000010567158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025179045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06655815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036455657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034761422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004148162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12195635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396241044","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.45","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Jewish Questions of Modern Natural Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Toleration; Judaism; Natural law; Enlightenment; Haskalah; Natural (archaeology); Law; Modernity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Jewish studies","score_opus":0.0227630601117135,"score_gpt":0.25606759601170487,"score_spread":0.23330453589999137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396241044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26657048,0.039884858,0.0041511664,0.19100648,0.0013355222,0.000013766157,0.0000691873,0.000046778718,0.49692184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804433,0.0025527615,0.00062039465,0.0038706022,0.000564543,0.0000073052756,0.0000075771263,0.0000064134865,0.011927219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922967,0.00044174815,0.000017510092,0.00006789503,0.00014701232,0.00009623004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990441,0.00056001195,0.000110051515,0.00007106056,0.00014808262,0.00006665376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023248862,0.00014324034,0.00016582267,0.00095177314,0.0036402938,0.0023711617,0.00037953196,0.0017659048,0.0022133254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018627394,0.00010695608,0.00013770032,0.0005128747,0.01776886,0.002294521,0.0011692423,0.0016365501,0.00017573434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009387896,0.000012716198,0.00027111298,0.00000906103,0.0000020856733,0.000064182845,0.0024686803,0.000072964336,0.00006645025,0.9910233,0.0031574601,0.0028425707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019958377,0.000026558651,0.0022073758,0.00014991786,0.000004849428,0.00014664681,0.0036789177,0.0003995513,0.00024752517,0.8377005,0.15540248,0.000015766844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007847446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012156952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007847446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045109293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015166056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03272921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396729275","doi":"10.1515/9782760638280-004","title":"L’objection leibnizienne au conventionnalisme de Hobbes","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.027559877083749938,"score_gpt":0.20645855325122706,"score_spread":0.17889867616747712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396729275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009998718,0.02523943,0.008678466,0.12592384,0.0051297164,0.00001873638,0.00019290704,0.00007833674,0.8247399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5013634,0.013382528,0.0047829496,0.033389702,0.010464996,0.0001838197,0.00012992251,0.00038354713,0.4359192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954158,0.0017835683,0.00012459581,0.00053099444,0.0015498445,0.0005951624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997551,0.0013674094,0.00013939461,0.00040923146,0.0004263525,0.000106626605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005054339,0.0006091067,0.0006743027,0.0017766961,0.0052249217,0.00847008,0.0013465086,0.006368876,0.010189087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007899254,0.0005281664,0.00057317474,0.002071971,0.029507564,0.007904561,0.0035398367,0.011702634,0.0017977151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002599445,0.0000014607648,0.000007990805,0.0000057714237,0.0000011625748,0.0000046665373,0.00037863318,0.00001719562,0.000019115165,0.9939889,0.004717942,0.0008547319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022203105,0.0000047968247,0.00027081548,0.00007942439,0.0000050185117,0.000045793604,0.00039122775,0.000100646874,0.0002002362,0.59960294,0.3992619,0.000015008738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058684044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04974613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058684044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014469161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068998155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11668497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396741350","doi":"10.1515/9782760638280-012","title":"Leibniz et la méthode de Hobbes au fondement de la philosophie naturelle","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.03255572491839458,"score_gpt":0.23684899720200897,"score_spread":0.20429327228361438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396741350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00999624,0.12240185,0.08776991,0.015281737,0.0028472769,0.000038206144,0.0002789617,0.00019139069,0.76119447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47552785,0.053017966,0.046674803,0.0024880683,0.0037479121,0.00024823114,0.00022191004,0.00042225578,0.41765106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810886,0.0010237957,0.00007367625,0.00019581325,0.00046404856,0.00013387554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991567,0.0005621207,0.000038389,0.000118534124,0.000092472634,0.000031894117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028978884,0.0010663565,0.00083319575,0.0034841595,0.002759254,0.0059211142,0.000951672,0.0020552208,0.009714016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030091514,0.00064834976,0.00058210443,0.0033449617,0.01597304,0.006286249,0.0018571536,0.003670775,0.0018871884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027624237,0.0000015887821,0.000010388933,0.00001783877,0.0000023140842,0.000004522727,0.00024338627,0.000058545378,0.000021653821,0.99477345,0.0015198751,0.0033437223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008419096,0.0000038981534,0.00010449171,0.000059234928,0.000005936055,0.000019534631,0.00012458072,0.0001899044,0.00013138885,0.89895916,0.10038641,0.0000071081604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01912327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024596123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01912327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009629281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036683711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069865644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399493231","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55920-4_5","title":"The “Theoretical Man of Morality” in The Birth of Tragedy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Morality; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.04415969365456428,"score_gpt":0.2472969709726555,"score_spread":0.20313727731809123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399493231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0123015,0.010860727,0.017473051,0.07148701,0.0017224889,0.000039485152,0.000058849313,0.00006311178,0.8859937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88014007,0.0038012783,0.003984345,0.00839996,0.001706369,0.00011389866,0.000038410148,0.00016998145,0.10164568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545175,0.0030056594,0.000087925066,0.0003737234,0.00056755723,0.0005133931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960847,0.0024044942,0.00024189313,0.0004632473,0.0005008573,0.00030487133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061108,0.00064375834,0.0005132415,0.0019960077,0.011833198,0.011238726,0.001703941,0.0057915477,0.007079478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008523339,0.00046288344,0.00046266112,0.0013716324,0.10662525,0.01278022,0.0045550736,0.011941734,0.00076811906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013645298,0.0000014039163,0.000012372722,0.000004284074,4.3245376e-7,0.000007761688,0.0019568864,0.000044438508,0.0000049911855,0.99622595,0.0011671282,0.0005729804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046296113,0.000004696574,0.00006005042,0.0000843867,0.000001361707,0.00003269166,0.0024706642,0.00017585837,0.000032150034,0.9317022,0.06542446,0.000006822678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010912096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01194188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011833198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010493581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008805647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07613659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399739659","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2024.2368311","title":"The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Culmination; German idealism; Idealism; German; Philosophy; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Physics","score_opus":0.031253599767993905,"score_gpt":0.25933258614796,"score_spread":0.2280789863799661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399739659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030551504,0.08289656,0.010562469,0.45108968,0.0030760774,0.00002531117,0.00010027502,0.00011943642,0.4215787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82481116,0.01781122,0.00334124,0.03254427,0.0018062728,0.000047614543,0.00004378045,0.0001632173,0.11943127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987103,0.0007390095,0.000022759623,0.00015549212,0.00020490754,0.00016765168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893385,0.0006469989,0.00006997197,0.00008999518,0.00014877114,0.00011042014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024626378,0.0004172026,0.00029852914,0.0010965671,0.005096723,0.0056700883,0.0005054308,0.0019648953,0.004582313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036111323,0.00021107255,0.0001824287,0.0010109021,0.023345714,0.008024115,0.0025957564,0.004315411,0.0007904179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015249059,0.0000056179047,0.00007271631,0.000011748338,0.0000014163194,0.000029119872,0.0024923896,0.00004353463,0.000024392039,0.97375846,0.018765798,0.004779648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014807591,0.0000069552852,0.00020724595,0.00009827425,0.0000034639706,0.000054847038,0.0026519778,0.0001678753,0.00027887672,0.794939,0.20156617,0.000010567734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008913659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011189311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008913659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005356343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033738168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038863182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399843194","doi":"10.1515/9782763714707-013","title":"Rendre Justice à Bayle : À PROPOS de la Tolérance et du Droit","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02865870682759299,"score_gpt":0.2534573641664117,"score_spread":0.22479865733881868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399843194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037285,0.0098122815,0.007056866,0.15024824,0.0033877979,0.00003054887,0.00005074137,0.000051732684,0.7920769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7056826,0.002021154,0.0013146125,0.035099182,0.0009919545,0.0000620062,0.000023688559,0.00012081274,0.25468394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945035,0.00196749,0.0001403146,0.0006440047,0.0014666757,0.0012780591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695265,0.0014850433,0.00021685046,0.00029413408,0.00068565196,0.00036562665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005482893,0.00041410152,0.0005403486,0.0010592862,0.016779857,0.0138495555,0.0014576217,0.009101201,0.011218391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01275959,0.00037976523,0.00034361123,0.0010950128,0.03969771,0.011396856,0.007787585,0.015574222,0.001357907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012990434,0.000009443012,0.00012324133,0.00001856012,0.000002654205,0.000094467905,0.016657047,0.00004109551,0.000042454645,0.96336836,0.013815263,0.005814382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023784825,0.000018080742,0.0006845021,0.00036148122,0.000011265379,0.00020785873,0.024286827,0.00016573278,0.00033521658,0.43253556,0.54133326,0.000036443656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04835644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078240804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04835644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01088607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011734571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09614998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400397984","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55064-5_14","title":"“I think h’as knocked his brains out”: Unhealthy Imagination in The Atheist’s Tragedy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.07134318961410777,"score_gpt":0.28157345115803445,"score_spread":0.21023026154392668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400397984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040819533,0.01866381,0.0038353067,0.21556763,0.0048746485,0.000022580842,0.000056787663,0.000076698925,0.716083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8436474,0.0029857098,0.001303699,0.038912628,0.0013665586,0.000033813234,0.00002228835,0.00014175914,0.11158613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979735,0.0013226478,0.000027797048,0.00015128922,0.00025220102,0.00027254687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861586,0.0008372932,0.00009345764,0.00012506086,0.00015923931,0.00016907329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032298586,0.00057572237,0.00038203466,0.0009927205,0.01287396,0.009259974,0.0007704073,0.005329523,0.005193811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004347529,0.00032034836,0.00027282487,0.0006069168,0.06328992,0.01160749,0.0036614046,0.012965173,0.0008476541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002615958,0.00001416786,0.000120832,0.000024897454,0.0000042389875,0.000118372685,0.07694903,0.000050099832,0.00011194503,0.88394,0.03402368,0.004616714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018742652,0.000018035431,0.0003884859,0.00023540195,0.0000062919316,0.00031161524,0.065693185,0.00014503345,0.0003030232,0.46445554,0.46839374,0.000030793093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007860752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013648802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01287396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003935998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002734625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028557777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400398043","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55064-5_15","title":"From the Image of Christ to the Imagining of the Sovereign: Donne, Hobbes, and the Eclipse of Participation and Transformation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Eclipse; Transformation (genetics); Sovereignty; Image (mathematics); Art; Philosophy; Theology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Law; Computer science; Physics; Astronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.031789632431623444,"score_gpt":0.24001443114734536,"score_spread":0.20822479871572191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400398043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012364526,0.016266245,0.003381931,0.025066737,0.00061203615,0.000015346537,0.000037149548,0.00001941824,0.9422365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8274035,0.00571486,0.0013985441,0.0036446587,0.00051267626,0.000054887718,0.000025612504,0.00010106205,0.16114424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978671,0.0013657921,0.00003373653,0.00018542074,0.00026917006,0.0002786751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985833,0.00095772184,0.000065938766,0.00014028393,0.00012542705,0.00012727302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027879782,0.00046351727,0.0005085446,0.001006181,0.0121575305,0.011034148,0.00091310986,0.0037791743,0.0077207214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034590224,0.00034139463,0.00022704963,0.0013712171,0.07251675,0.011163494,0.0038086113,0.006746392,0.0008672754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040810096,0.0000030433355,0.000012329412,0.000008931589,3.6459284e-7,0.000013764677,0.011539798,0.000013778006,0.00001499812,0.9849813,0.0023921807,0.001015559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010114919,0.00000910212,0.00012661502,0.00018226981,0.0000024814685,0.00007449363,0.022370247,0.000072209485,0.00012657276,0.7091252,0.26789004,0.000010582627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024391066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04478117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024391066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074459724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065305415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054024577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400507784","doi":"10.59123/passion.v2i1.16829","title":"Locke, Anger and the State","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Passion Journal of the European Philosophical Society for the Study of Emotions","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keio University; York University","keywords":"Anger; State (computer science); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law and economics; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.050142575376331065,"score_gpt":0.2665976385428139,"score_spread":0.2164550631664828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400507784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12871568,0.056965984,0.012045431,0.13202092,0.0012959497,0.00003658332,0.00004155463,0.000054063545,0.66882384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98104745,0.005357731,0.00057921495,0.0028236504,0.00021561942,0.000016134361,0.0000045788547,0.000010401898,0.009945237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744284,0.0018907216,0.00004404036,0.00014921841,0.0002233864,0.00024984902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822456,0.0011644594,0.00024104641,0.00009700918,0.000128289,0.0001446642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002201112,0.00021743306,0.00019991967,0.0007503147,0.0040434394,0.0059355972,0.0003262345,0.002097509,0.0018035097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033002116,0.00014178494,0.00021712088,0.00055151974,0.029461963,0.004333711,0.0022172472,0.003034547,0.00023703743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012813022,0.0000079032,0.000515652,0.00002632584,0.000004010314,0.00007498175,0.024377258,0.000068694484,0.000090338275,0.96828586,0.0019839637,0.004552228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025885913,0.000052104555,0.0049712737,0.00039427684,0.000015690408,0.00047634487,0.043790933,0.0005202673,0.00037068813,0.75489354,0.19444457,0.000044350305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036281645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002854803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059355972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027502966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001224827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01995486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400686758","doi":"10.21827/jss.3.1.41848","title":"Spinoza and Spinozism in Twenty-First Century Anglophone Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Spinoza Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0672691735678386,"score_gpt":0.2953752654192147,"score_spread":0.22810609185137612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400686758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24846634,0.05254247,0.004579631,0.037764795,0.00083683955,0.000023858765,0.000044605167,0.000033377502,0.655708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97569525,0.0057454347,0.00044718763,0.0020346658,0.0001610161,0.000014347473,0.000010831207,0.0000126134155,0.015878616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990244,0.00052050274,0.000031880038,0.00007533497,0.00013235955,0.0002155422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992748,0.00034537286,0.00008943654,0.000036035723,0.00010966566,0.00014465892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016063161,0.00019387566,0.00018644128,0.0014158841,0.006663289,0.005346138,0.00029182096,0.00078258594,0.0028967948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012271665,0.00010775015,0.000113504204,0.0013302554,0.021684945,0.0036384317,0.002269258,0.0020961792,0.0002574626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011798459,0.000009687726,0.0004044288,0.000036756173,0.0000015160556,0.000042397212,0.03272739,0.000024930147,0.000050671155,0.96127635,0.0011781526,0.0042359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021534683,0.00004720378,0.0068984074,0.00061138335,0.000010313749,0.00022224404,0.08137684,0.0002935628,0.00025680347,0.37964946,0.53058374,0.000028461862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018603245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027991926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018603245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008843522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003936716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06416458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400768650","doi":"10.3998/ergo.6156","title":"Healthy and Happy Natural Being: Spinoza and Epicurus Contra the Stoics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epicureanism; Pleasure; Happiness; Hedonism; Realm; Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Soul; Aesthetics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; History; Psychotherapist; Political science","score_opus":0.11626775954345157,"score_gpt":0.3860840013377269,"score_spread":0.2698162417942753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400768650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30797496,0.016555276,0.020494355,0.033512726,0.0014867662,0.00004280386,0.000049662627,0.00006887034,0.6198146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819359,0.001260644,0.0013780268,0.002118824,0.00013071673,0.000014734887,0.000013890228,0.000016019207,0.013131222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987889,0.0006298462,0.00004862019,0.0001876936,0.00018857508,0.00015637463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994319,0.0002518756,0.00007791662,0.00009737749,0.000074763935,0.00006605902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002007028,0.00031559603,0.0004498889,0.00080843753,0.0035723129,0.0045605707,0.00033201184,0.0014911473,0.0021364682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017066249,0.00014529539,0.00025484018,0.0006069503,0.029853027,0.0037130057,0.00375614,0.0024737103,0.00028455103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002470655,0.000005141718,0.00025553073,0.000041522577,0.000003936634,0.00009119026,0.013546437,0.000048894024,0.00018580862,0.9803051,0.00060194207,0.00488991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036107675,0.00010398034,0.0037174767,0.0002812299,0.000026242524,0.00060788286,0.031172067,0.00039821782,0.0004805036,0.7803701,0.18276869,0.000037511036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022685025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040856963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045605707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016342477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012812555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01185739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402217689","doi":"10.7202/1112014ar","title":"Christopher Martin, \"Spinoza's Argument for Substance Monism: Why There Is Only One Thing\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.10423878512950345,"score_gpt":0.30377479423191883,"score_spread":0.19953600910241537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402217689","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034738606,0.75079894,0.0006124607,0.22962365,0.00716529,0.000013194728,0.00018468003,0.000028028933,0.011226494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03702398,0.7285156,0.0013095689,0.18843578,0.009329441,0.00018207252,0.00041775222,0.00010019965,0.0346856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674964,0.0013130575,0.00014488793,0.00033091125,0.0012540065,0.00020756514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947695,0.0031737753,0.000395737,0.00010528644,0.0013675047,0.00018818844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038175774,0.00072703295,0.0007349177,0.0020471516,0.0020100283,0.0030748271,0.0015935138,0.0047124787,0.0067037432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01201371,0.00046889807,0.0005690134,0.0034845849,0.0033062934,0.007952589,0.0015534275,0.006227717,0.0023541364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006045282,0.000012637145,0.0001683658,0.0015868485,0.00004013377,0.00005722374,0.0007137704,0.00005115653,0.00010134733,0.112244904,0.86557287,0.01939026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004954036,0.000016273669,0.0013618319,0.0022642317,0.00005880118,0.00010429206,0.00052580494,0.000056196997,0.00034022378,0.05986113,0.9353337,0.000027908392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0273934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03944647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0273934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046668765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008816678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054467916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403582153","doi":"10.1080/24740500.2024.2364400","title":"Spinoza, Poetry, and Human Bondage","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Philosophical Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08730147598389335,"score_gpt":0.32501422954412346,"score_spread":0.2377127535602301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403582153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07988988,0.03356718,0.0071161645,0.026655363,0.00080108974,0.00002390961,0.000033549746,0.000055246597,0.8518576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97954124,0.0037379148,0.0007574242,0.0006576889,0.00015058028,0.0000127355825,0.000008688558,0.000015330039,0.01511838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863726,0.0008910097,0.00003576146,0.00013164523,0.00014485863,0.00015952803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991279,0.0004986947,0.000110577115,0.0000927787,0.000075421274,0.00009467222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015009264,0.0003151841,0.00027378745,0.0014218715,0.006555244,0.0061552958,0.00044066232,0.0012944494,0.0051105884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021368372,0.00011514948,0.000112827394,0.0015974095,0.043534633,0.004745222,0.0027694057,0.0023208328,0.0003597922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009100963,0.0000057809593,0.00011535034,0.000031028278,0.000001253006,0.00004309715,0.014040225,0.00003189449,0.000054151908,0.97991955,0.0009813703,0.0047673276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013023013,0.00003194653,0.0013794729,0.00022980604,0.0000053753447,0.00028032376,0.037595913,0.00014238208,0.00019950687,0.6356109,0.32449493,0.000016375303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047299876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057922723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006555244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027517527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015687945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01996547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404042100","doi":"10.1515/humaff-2024-0049","title":"Collingwood on Spinoza and the Social-Political Role of Art","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Affairs","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.03258392775982888,"score_gpt":0.27151740316125067,"score_spread":0.2389334754014218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404042100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08819325,0.010765452,0.004965075,0.039797083,0.0005039254,0.000019905643,0.0000252032,0.000023694398,0.8557064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96477294,0.0017595774,0.0006870575,0.001805409,0.00017548408,0.000018786743,0.00000515386,0.000021975931,0.030753585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998406,0.0009155834,0.000023390285,0.00016178687,0.00022807468,0.000265133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980769,0.0014858675,0.00008244399,0.00010480183,0.00013554284,0.00011439776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018209197,0.00031978262,0.00024929715,0.0014028302,0.008492258,0.009224275,0.00049373537,0.00201911,0.0046421937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019893886,0.00012808951,0.00015871687,0.00084936345,0.053645253,0.004403486,0.0030692094,0.0032696412,0.00030149665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043948276,0.0000034582258,0.000052444855,0.000007638236,5.0990207e-7,0.00004604636,0.011770315,0.000040095147,0.00002622862,0.9856641,0.0011724796,0.001212355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011416005,0.00002031863,0.00074489467,0.00032759082,0.000005248982,0.00014576007,0.030725509,0.00037956654,0.00035404554,0.5878276,0.37944138,0.000016721717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015759144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02134355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015759144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071210107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002142508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051666796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404615350","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a944571","title":"Hume on the Rational and Irrational Origins of Religion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13029612158841772,"score_gpt":0.3167380861961961,"score_spread":0.18644196460777837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404615350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12934351,0.01084252,0.03277352,0.1402929,0.0013537372,0.000045722885,0.000090554975,0.00013641511,0.6851211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871453,0.00079158985,0.0015702235,0.0026401242,0.00033446387,0.000015761729,0.000012230363,0.000029440664,0.0074609765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962132,0.0026985316,0.00006818084,0.00027789397,0.00051405537,0.0002281481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481815,0.0033429256,0.0003935651,0.0004758474,0.0007555498,0.00021389968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004109713,0.000252532,0.0003156893,0.0013523104,0.0028791502,0.0051535056,0.00078122236,0.0024537912,0.0024155786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048634415,0.00019519968,0.00027994555,0.00064913626,0.030196643,0.0041392306,0.0032999169,0.0041654888,0.00044237112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009602535,0.000007120084,0.00015899015,0.0000132676705,0.0000024724507,0.00004405916,0.0024134556,0.00015025835,0.000038639067,0.9943309,0.0013921775,0.0014390491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010361977,0.000008478115,0.00027981622,0.0000520478,0.000004024572,0.000060197573,0.0010580864,0.0006017416,0.00019949752,0.9710688,0.02664708,0.000009875038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021245526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015897228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051535056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038686998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001624022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028069496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404855173","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-69929-0","title":"Rousseau and the Limits of the Liberal International Order","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03991521069858822,"score_gpt":0.2479019723488227,"score_spread":0.20798676165023447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404855173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00438039,0.007027732,0.0010339573,0.011199103,0.00017267186,0.000008423958,0.000013231555,0.000038802864,0.9761258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70486736,0.007231627,0.0026395367,0.0037711018,0.00081886945,0.00008930825,0.000038407372,0.00012615808,0.28041774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971392,0.0013757205,0.000047481164,0.00033827813,0.0006426766,0.0004566818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841774,0.0008304169,0.00014991581,0.00026141293,0.00018627688,0.00015416261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002258483,0.00035558554,0.00039956073,0.0013618331,0.005620474,0.009644914,0.0008814327,0.0024630714,0.009583737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005169901,0.00025585343,0.0003008678,0.0009792093,0.026247086,0.0059246765,0.00365796,0.0041748905,0.002193791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002326871,0.0000016496684,0.000030673003,0.000004859941,4.5562598e-7,0.000013276871,0.0009124286,0.00003416607,0.000010499744,0.9934957,0.002723975,0.0027699997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073233705,0.000011144508,0.00035578638,0.00014981916,0.000002383171,0.00009087858,0.0014501174,0.00018387852,0.00006582723,0.5592987,0.4383733,0.000010874153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017669177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020328436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017669177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007869943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056549837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057100713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405899000","doi":"","title":"« L’héritage cartésien de Spinoza en question »","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cart; Humanities; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.02341431472140904,"score_gpt":0.25550874198116597,"score_spread":0.23209442725975693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405899000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025631668,0.022496114,0.0038214407,0.07684765,0.0046348,0.00001899783,0.00012314263,0.00008541937,0.86634076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5728463,0.006847978,0.0015757974,0.008083008,0.0018581656,0.000043215798,0.000095849544,0.00025124595,0.40839854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895954,0.0004060257,0.00003164649,0.00016619141,0.00017224408,0.00026439325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996019,0.00017105695,0.00003467311,0.000059254155,0.000071989554,0.00006113806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014790483,0.00059757906,0.0005118706,0.0013890339,0.0106106205,0.011739593,0.0005491067,0.0032023126,0.01953161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017051859,0.00025293537,0.00035223842,0.0013779654,0.01837154,0.0059237336,0.00328361,0.0060636145,0.0021367944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001437508,0.0000040908144,0.000063713975,0.000020093205,0.0000019355953,0.00006045708,0.0064761597,0.00001915854,0.00007998713,0.9789413,0.010870716,0.0034478898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011811568,0.000006334546,0.0004080303,0.00009837535,0.000004477158,0.00018825296,0.0069906283,0.000058336067,0.00013536135,0.08138155,0.91070455,0.000012274674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03537318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0478252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03537318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009750768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00433209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07074714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406098040","doi":"10.1111/sjp.12612","title":"A common measure: Hobbes on the epistemic functions of public reason","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sovereignty; Epistemology; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08143138602242155,"score_gpt":0.2541070526870265,"score_spread":0.17267566666460493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406098040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027538411,0.010341002,0.23467074,0.073685244,0.0015327858,0.000083946994,0.00011407552,0.00013451742,0.6518992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588231,0.0018819958,0.018366285,0.003464466,0.0010980448,0.00015755549,0.000042765878,0.00011017874,0.016055547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874681,0.008767893,0.0003819913,0.0011013795,0.0016891959,0.00059137656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689157,0.0087160915,0.0005604055,0.0018112345,0.0014616841,0.00055912486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014265261,0.00068487227,0.0010675637,0.003196929,0.0061289966,0.010759259,0.0011416108,0.004841569,0.0044765878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017989116,0.0005089714,0.0010974753,0.0019792232,0.055792313,0.015548933,0.0067422017,0.0067407587,0.0010099708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018839129,0.000001617564,0.0000072121748,0.0000030363592,0.0000010164159,0.0000052334954,0.00025315597,0.000055166372,0.000008251949,0.9990276,0.00027269323,0.00036306778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029355076,0.0000020862967,0.000012681882,0.000015863545,0.0000013559824,0.0000052580604,0.00011030717,0.00013478575,0.000020271758,0.99603504,0.0036564828,0.0000028307873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024273575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014404764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014265261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072914795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026584892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07544279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555216","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.003.0013","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Ghost of Spinoza","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.043100008402505746,"score_gpt":0.20154293871263035,"score_spread":0.1584429303101246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013513527,0.078301944,0.0027525364,0.05263911,0.0019898515,0.000011861429,0.00009032813,0.00008427662,0.8506165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41669145,0.03725189,0.0021643415,0.0071973843,0.0017311528,0.00003728824,0.000050354225,0.00010802487,0.5347681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997671,0.00007909577,0.000004641358,0.000036653626,0.00008429792,0.000028173323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977416,0.00013073729,0.000016949596,0.000021681673,0.000034105866,0.000022422764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044504466,0.00028226487,0.00018615263,0.00067055627,0.0023212093,0.0022657854,0.00021597165,0.000914856,0.0070647052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090800377,0.00015081599,0.0000898849,0.0005646042,0.0060572233,0.003148422,0.00080196327,0.0020226953,0.001163085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057918814,0.0000053482536,0.000043009626,0.00002030577,9.624731e-7,0.000029287054,0.0013063432,0.00005445831,0.00006608915,0.9587055,0.031523377,0.008239483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004053531,0.0000065071577,0.00023928726,0.00011277364,0.0000019784634,0.00008330472,0.00079668756,0.00013128125,0.00014913005,0.21228479,0.78618413,0.000006094229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008501876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016451294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008501876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037723568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002065144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027370512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407705554","doi":"10.5771/9780739135990-361","title":"Appendix M. Glimpses of Leo Strauss, Jacob Klein, and St. John's College (2009)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appendix; History; Classics; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.035321976879097036,"score_gpt":0.23145519766526235,"score_spread":0.1961332207861653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407705554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011306452,0.017068893,0.0030375898,0.014307831,0.007538634,0.00039073415,0.022442523,0.0007183093,0.9333648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065488075,0.012423122,0.0033591953,0.0039493837,0.0017689556,0.00038803674,0.009865106,0.00052301824,0.9611746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978477,0.000047985373,0.000016684511,0.000030803505,0.00009557979,0.00002413441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830985,0.0006728912,0.00007680153,0.00008427191,0.00074469025,0.00011157519],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043681674,0.00064406794,0.0005731938,0.0028080293,0.0011714413,0.0013263406,0.00076768664,0.00080114976,0.47992638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045233294,0.00037692595,0.0002900563,0.0033380254,0.00040066856,0.0027249854,0.001028718,0.0012684164,0.2136863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051851002,0.0000063095713,0.000037977956,0.000067274115,4.027835e-7,0.000010867427,0.000040609673,0.00001151525,0.000016402691,0.0026231257,0.98487616,0.01230426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004540943,0.000007284466,0.0007597034,0.00015220817,0.0000011067974,0.000072053386,0.00012141832,0.000021499365,0.000034476736,0.0029011555,0.9959209,0.000003647884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014088787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029635737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47992638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015385646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015246912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7418219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408574690","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13057","title":"Parmenides and Dr. Strangelove, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Monism and Accept the World of Relations, at least for the sake of the Good","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.07473006558338527,"score_gpt":0.2790832779192636,"score_spread":0.2043532123358783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408574690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031570022,0.038740896,0.0021561142,0.30535254,0.047689926,0.00010388705,0.0006223567,0.00086316234,0.6013141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022215895,0.011182008,0.0008226665,0.042591255,0.0058979406,0.00005968579,0.00021956558,0.00035897983,0.9166519],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962854,0.00009664164,0.00001197037,0.00008638316,0.000108012326,0.00006856684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993067,0.00009740132,0.000054789965,0.00002866055,0.0001425426,0.00036987447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042141622,0.0006466136,0.00027330444,0.0003707616,0.0029661523,0.0031731427,0.0005618235,0.0022405398,0.20157798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026916526,0.00025315443,0.00021258775,0.00036038386,0.0009843967,0.0031287097,0.0012769488,0.004305467,0.06759763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014387764,0.000007883235,0.000093573115,0.000036606492,0.000001203157,0.000067511086,0.00031059573,0.000005483169,0.00010577277,0.0025583555,0.9831645,0.013634116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030314345,0.000005690286,0.00016760407,0.000034597047,9.567311e-7,0.00020647507,0.0005741718,0.000012165978,0.00005407377,0.0002558944,0.9986827,0.00000255513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066409525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017462183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20157798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014921537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082994497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409312973","doi":"10.3138/ecf.2023-0071","title":"Dialectic of Whimsy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Philosophy; Geology; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018916422396269877,"score_gpt":0.23962540973984467,"score_spread":0.2207089873435748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409312973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14031829,0.005253057,0.020959087,0.016590066,0.0007573598,0.000035140747,0.00006901313,0.00016684772,0.8158511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97187996,0.0004121299,0.0012843424,0.000646106,0.000075153206,0.000020018915,0.000010442844,0.000056243043,0.025615558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804175,0.001171614,0.00003859458,0.00026174323,0.00026037218,0.00022599062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906796,0.00050957676,0.000084095205,0.00013203225,0.00011942528,0.00008686379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022204618,0.00042687022,0.00021472575,0.0010715511,0.005456068,0.005002052,0.00055115874,0.001230561,0.0034784307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032822157,0.00018060001,0.00019719855,0.00084400637,0.032527998,0.0038937684,0.003495919,0.0023996434,0.00037307118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011439662,0.000002557002,0.00012880389,0.000017879282,0.0000019324157,0.000063808235,0.055760164,0.00004824442,0.00020253843,0.9400042,0.0011990619,0.0025593322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000171222,0.000052372197,0.0011070485,0.0001880895,0.000009319767,0.00045441717,0.058226783,0.000563893,0.0012775974,0.45273307,0.4853394,0.000030892294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056326604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071458835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056326604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004773591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019597262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034634948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409982317","doi":"10.1177/14748851251337317","title":"The unbearable lightness of servitude: Étienne de la Boétie and the fragility of freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Philosophy; Lightness; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.011420913250980972,"score_gpt":0.24118129092060284,"score_spread":0.22976037766962187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409982317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052768797,0.027001375,0.0064795804,0.2506126,0.001970542,0.000023709275,0.000030593405,0.0000454987,0.6610673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9115688,0.004822352,0.0013710477,0.024286937,0.001128148,0.000055923774,0.000015894348,0.00006227507,0.056688588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637526,0.0022241466,0.000041213087,0.00029162574,0.00045779956,0.0006100051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740285,0.0017345505,0.0001834861,0.00017167286,0.00022949922,0.00027796006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047236052,0.00030753398,0.00036046375,0.0010752185,0.010191497,0.009395923,0.00059209816,0.004433715,0.0022526905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044593066,0.00027861766,0.00030530058,0.0008325093,0.05026138,0.006152686,0.00396157,0.008560083,0.00042755483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059167946,0.00000731526,0.00007925278,0.0000061700266,9.027805e-7,0.000023885947,0.0075350082,0.00004568185,0.000016676635,0.9868674,0.0043219184,0.0010898791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016934466,0.000014243233,0.0004464051,0.00015520708,0.0000032246287,0.000089318106,0.0074437796,0.00024940431,0.00009450657,0.6681317,0.323331,0.000024313062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013223419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010693051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013223419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00716711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038013814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052001297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410130677","doi":"10.5117/9789463728799_ch14","title":"Born in Bondage: Slavery, Freedom, and Enlightenment in Spinoza","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.029156413115465143,"score_gpt":0.22717433115239105,"score_spread":0.19801791803692592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410130677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027357105,0.014949183,0.0023135813,0.009635019,0.00039706362,0.000015995696,0.000027402091,0.000025563442,0.94527906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76268387,0.007844626,0.0010937216,0.0016145691,0.0001808123,0.000030915522,0.00003495932,0.000047184083,0.22646935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996321,0.00016909257,0.0000076217266,0.000036997,0.000072513605,0.00008153827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998567,0.00007570604,0.00001246354,0.000014608769,0.000012681792,0.000027859489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005431887,0.00024262856,0.00021106833,0.0005245746,0.0054090056,0.0065257535,0.00030795412,0.0012010278,0.0060209273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054846774,0.0001348078,0.00014548101,0.00081172166,0.010739138,0.0040157745,0.0019705128,0.0029654668,0.0006198891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005068042,0.000010060739,0.00008213408,0.000013756884,7.73229e-7,0.00004998473,0.010991709,0.000034433546,0.000040679643,0.9779018,0.00472957,0.006140033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010395757,0.00001943814,0.0012059474,0.0002270692,0.0000065177815,0.00023689511,0.017918939,0.00019596994,0.00034084442,0.3323459,0.6474791,0.0000129775935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014100834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037321415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014100834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040796585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021257035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029600084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412276663","doi":"","title":"The Unlikely Claimant:Sovereignty and Republicanism in Hobbes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05608022653346238,"score_gpt":0.24570492915902634,"score_spread":0.18962470262556397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412276663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10013465,0.012279082,0.05507274,0.048049923,0.0011466886,0.00003795636,0.000046339443,0.000050857725,0.7831817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98501784,0.000983513,0.0018531759,0.0011244798,0.00021719745,0.000022920776,0.000012295853,0.000029583773,0.0107389735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974486,0.0017869304,0.00006821027,0.00021760465,0.0002573092,0.00022120962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824107,0.001307046,0.00010000655,0.00016512498,0.000099495424,0.000087345725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038876035,0.00024487564,0.00040160737,0.00092820346,0.005475389,0.0061991676,0.0006195658,0.0023367272,0.0036079253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005257744,0.00023319921,0.00033086073,0.0007521434,0.03770769,0.007758392,0.0037322736,0.0038805762,0.00043781305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004587895,0.0000019000624,0.000031978234,0.000004749774,8.051297e-7,0.000019650837,0.003043635,0.000044271685,0.000025013525,0.99594975,0.00026163537,0.000611937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052310065,0.0000071153963,0.00012390013,0.000039705574,0.000002629573,0.000043992797,0.0019883749,0.00027491697,0.00008445469,0.97313344,0.024291048,0.0000052077908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030123177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033695707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061991676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029645113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001102031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02150911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414609349","doi":"10.5380/dp.v22i1.98420","title":"Racionalismo, ceticismo e a coerência do Commentaire Philosophique de Bayle","year":2025,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"DoisPontos","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.030488771076574956,"score_gpt":0.30232797423036334,"score_spread":0.2718392031537884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414609349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10287643,0.023792082,0.018026557,0.21117431,0.002488517,0.00004034209,0.0002984202,0.00010333446,0.6412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89271015,0.0035723676,0.0022577592,0.012855171,0.0007907882,0.00005809517,0.00006757151,0.000094470684,0.08759356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972458,0.0015264218,0.00007857304,0.00037704324,0.00049407623,0.00027812048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967033,0.0020731445,0.0003718454,0.00031448482,0.0003752969,0.00016176439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003538325,0.0003732832,0.00027242434,0.0010248398,0.006523099,0.0062460788,0.0006708535,0.0032679555,0.0055968687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005725434,0.00017798138,0.00023696465,0.0014320271,0.020255707,0.0052800663,0.003772061,0.0057049682,0.0006310233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017983233,0.0000029007192,0.00029803315,0.0000322096,0.0000023167456,0.000046958412,0.017450964,0.000050016537,0.000096598254,0.96951103,0.009031106,0.0034599565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016782627,0.000015391737,0.0023392963,0.00035866658,0.000007981595,0.00013657426,0.016387803,0.0003048025,0.00046629686,0.263436,0.7165026,0.000027847878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015720101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020530345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015720101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008180134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037355123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059351265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414753228","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2551577","title":"Is Spinoza a dualist?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Dualism; Subject (documents); Relation (database); Ontology; Idiosyncrasy; Philosophy of mind","score_opus":0.07921737422259575,"score_gpt":0.27660107335320183,"score_spread":0.19738369913060608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414753228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041861057,0.006307519,0.047355756,0.1141658,0.0021359788,0.000039132803,0.00019852743,0.00022750758,0.7877088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91419286,0.0024340942,0.011095753,0.013387946,0.0010995592,0.00011669041,0.00010262755,0.00015605956,0.05741445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970381,0.00089189433,0.00010173565,0.0006920372,0.00075803243,0.000518139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982376,0.00052839395,0.00016478788,0.0003791837,0.00033307375,0.00035692524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031155888,0.0004140401,0.00086038525,0.0017647645,0.0075141788,0.012188063,0.0011998352,0.0033981754,0.010632308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033853727,0.00040611057,0.0008997516,0.0013426067,0.033970714,0.014785087,0.0059244297,0.007052116,0.0018069948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071947507,0.000003764163,0.00007604526,0.000008070351,0.0000023312227,0.000017699265,0.0006347796,0.000012274721,0.00001747332,0.996653,0.0012476281,0.0013197116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000943177,0.0000054375273,0.00012692809,0.00003297746,0.0000044073763,0.00009036466,0.0010102787,0.00018206646,0.00005941629,0.9462779,0.052193437,0.000007377138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007781354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067091873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012188063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006445244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039206273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046763718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414755517","doi":"10.26417/zb79g671","title":"How to Read Spinoza Without Pentimento: An Alternative to Strauss","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Judgement; Reading (process); Sympathy; Politics; Reflexive pronoun; Censorship","score_opus":0.189284574453231,"score_gpt":0.4512677063186946,"score_spread":0.2619831318654636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414755517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059167016,0.009589137,0.17262335,0.2385403,0.003995622,0.00017212471,0.00015216382,0.00054503366,0.5152153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88804066,0.0021259186,0.03553376,0.014397159,0.00084838655,0.0002044626,0.00005895384,0.00039638643,0.058394287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517524,0.0029783319,0.00019340808,0.00053312455,0.0008256096,0.0002942878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950157,0.0027293353,0.00034211358,0.00056297274,0.001132883,0.00021701075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040591946,0.00066867814,0.00060559704,0.0025660123,0.0056022983,0.008083489,0.0015943182,0.003343366,0.0039536157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012718864,0.00031425603,0.00056657806,0.0017373237,0.028508564,0.010380303,0.003487968,0.0067000887,0.0013444999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019854362,0.000007025191,0.0001320172,0.000035191577,0.000004361957,0.000057363784,0.013641938,0.000081710954,0.000115109666,0.97488505,0.0049906275,0.0060297656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019294195,0.00002990553,0.00024242788,0.0002782547,0.000016370728,0.00015672829,0.014035924,0.0013070791,0.00079845305,0.76575476,0.21732171,0.00003912726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016720211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028148467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016720211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066671725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043118247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048373938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54198990","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v22i2.44219","title":"Human Nature and the Development of Character: The Clash of Descriptive and Normative Elements in John Stuart Mill's Educational Theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Character (mathematics); Mill; Character development; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Geography; Mathematics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03185774913721692,"score_gpt":0.2966862218726598,"score_spread":0.26482847273544285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54198990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052616917,0.023091681,0.03530648,0.16637078,0.0014152561,0.00005443658,0.0000513076,0.00006865211,0.7210246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579268,0.005022435,0.004897319,0.0074458793,0.00058789237,0.00008392862,0.0000138482965,0.000035031895,0.023986971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760973,0.0015742615,0.00006103792,0.00015007418,0.00045306035,0.000151818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622214,0.0027515308,0.00023033065,0.00014404174,0.0003753848,0.00027663173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030306706,0.00028989484,0.0002465909,0.0014385204,0.004180183,0.0077119586,0.0005168254,0.0014853276,0.0010653604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004246103,0.00026236285,0.00018599328,0.00092106016,0.040002592,0.0051577487,0.0018453881,0.003558314,0.00017943795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003227291,0.000006676098,0.00009183939,0.000008465819,5.8159947e-7,0.000016284355,0.0035847186,0.000058716254,0.00001305024,0.99321026,0.0014996089,0.0015065697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007003741,0.000008030801,0.0004293357,0.00010176296,0.0000032710311,0.00005549281,0.0031313815,0.0003635623,0.000084876105,0.9232108,0.07259397,0.000010583121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005815337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00772165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077119586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004825058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030396814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03500837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612896012","doi":"10.71781/16366","title":"Droit naturel comme fondement du droit international chez Hobbes","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.07137457986072894,"score_gpt":0.30705109775784306,"score_spread":0.23567651789711414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W612896012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11557628,0.045665618,0.0037959146,0.022814138,0.0018657153,0.000020870812,0.0003406563,0.00008082819,0.80983996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5957821,0.007943287,0.0009717224,0.00081630977,0.00040858265,0.00002290227,0.00007467665,0.00011847804,0.39386192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938715,0.00024198927,0.000009975848,0.00009889078,0.000113953574,0.00014810916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995371,0.00017958871,0.000046006044,0.00003500135,0.00008680517,0.00011549087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086279435,0.0003956372,0.00022101226,0.0009995003,0.0060088057,0.005013875,0.00035071536,0.0012500505,0.014243387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016474475,0.00019588358,0.00014706461,0.0012968503,0.0062169693,0.0024810776,0.0015064355,0.0020616327,0.0011084814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008089996,0.000015200391,0.0019216452,0.00007872278,0.0000070470305,0.000426984,0.1369906,0.00010760805,0.0008611014,0.7858298,0.037136104,0.036544293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046002247,0.000011765271,0.00621703,0.000108394765,0.0000046440755,0.00021479712,0.017088309,0.00004890149,0.00037025803,0.006010964,0.96990687,0.000013502889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3143096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54407007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3143096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00934408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004544379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6249602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621692400","doi":"","title":"Of Philosophers and Kings: Political Philosophy in Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear by Leon Harold Craig (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Philosophy; Literature; Classics; History; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0263860310566658,"score_gpt":0.20624662021497464,"score_spread":0.17986058915830883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621692400","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012579079,0.966465,0.000035936013,0.028521404,0.0019397715,0.0000013281948,0.000013026648,0.00000225786,0.002895417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009996963,0.9598705,0.0000931233,0.013094965,0.0058913156,0.000013590688,0.000037058744,0.000011430437,0.010990998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976961,0.0010236609,0.00011882036,0.00019047018,0.00071521034,0.00025575867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431324,0.003287109,0.00038139877,0.00018393407,0.0012245976,0.00060979964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045529353,0.0009378493,0.0018224533,0.0044324435,0.0046369247,0.0069078803,0.0011343143,0.0057596317,0.0073453817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077193957,0.0008178962,0.00035566505,0.010911699,0.011536406,0.008475208,0.0031009612,0.0048826383,0.001948635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003873021,0.000020890371,0.0003511497,0.002395043,0.00003716384,0.000075003256,0.004856903,0.000109491346,0.000040916813,0.08573814,0.80588025,0.10045636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011078005,0.000008414049,0.0012672135,0.0024193288,0.000014987024,0.000070065245,0.0019142701,0.000013709522,0.00001474505,0.008832901,0.985421,0.000012377845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1490104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28773782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1490104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012528161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025376145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29628617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6910864924","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2008.02775","title":"Forecasting Photovoltaic Power Production using a Deep Learning Sequence to Sequence Model with Attention","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deep learning; Photovoltaic system; Context (archaeology); Mean squared error; Sequence (biology); Time series; Artificial neural network; Baseline (sea); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.32654920202149307,"score_gpt":0.2302686790697529,"score_spread":0.09628052295174017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6910864924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2611484,0.0011793713,0.7262482,0.0019319658,0.00033205678,0.00006024409,0.0008970409,0.0018368567,0.0063659004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603359,0.00032564945,0.03261777,0.00025512103,0.00010492968,0.000057099023,0.00076624576,0.000036356254,0.0055009457],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998771,0.00002154148,0.0000056221543,0.000047976355,0.000022861112,0.000024870347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996786,0.00016622685,0.000036170026,0.000020207322,0.00007516779,0.00002355317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039331152,0.0005999303,0.00053185807,0.00041602424,0.00021185445,0.00057326216,0.00085986435,0.00091148703,0.0017010836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011529899,0.0003423076,0.0005550687,0.0005108913,0.0003179104,0.0009190741,0.000552276,0.001575239,0.0003634298],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006631357,0.00006827213,0.0013392969,0.000024229155,0.000030267387,0.00005811574,0.000024273955,0.9511229,0.001212145,0.0026056215,0.001352175,0.042096406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015158879,0.0000043587365,0.000065465,9.250632e-7,0.0000013959808,0.0000019717393,7.752586e-7,0.99910235,0.000103112776,0.00066396984,0.000053148062,9.677314e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016171245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01861468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016171245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086948345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082093314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032154262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924400513","doi":"10.15468/dl.ppl2od","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Order (exchange); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.04357963022884868,"score_gpt":0.23184672765246955,"score_spread":0.18826709742362088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924400513","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048282836,0.000036448717,0.00004126169,0.000043220974,0.000013255172,0.0000053328986,0.9988556,0.00029890783,0.00065766403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00016412306,0.00004123671,0.00018085245,0.000046216188,0.0000038823273,0.00004006378,0.99892324,0.000097626886,0.0005026849],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998973,0.0001443113,0.00013666376,0.0003353307,0.00024173193,0.00016896399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978167,0.00061291695,0.00022436403,0.00054957217,0.00053767796,0.0002587971],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009975833,0.0018939746,0.0015160395,0.005173561,0.0010247646,0.002666971,0.0029037902,0.0022334538,0.12297735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005514371,0.0007431843,0.0010752431,0.010374852,0.0005084903,0.002140013,0.0025829193,0.0021015601,0.18424179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029116381,0.0000122355095,0.00040066027,0.00054329477,0.0000141742585,0.000018356624,0.000025435025,0.00013101018,0.00010827038,0.00048974354,0.9967044,0.0015233272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062947314,0.000007213563,0.0016334737,0.0001870006,0.000011406816,0.000036365815,0.00007035861,0.00014458461,0.00017452979,0.00077571673,0.99688125,0.000015228559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020626469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03732145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8770226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017600498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023562852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4114002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996780073","doi":"","title":"Spinoza and Spinozism in Twenty-First Century Anglo-American Philosophy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Metaphysics; Politics; Political philosophy; History of philosophy","score_opus":0.026575595968157017,"score_gpt":0.25208221948797144,"score_spread":0.22550662351981443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996780073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19386254,0.065309644,0.005300647,0.05817793,0.0013218506,0.000024513365,0.000052656756,0.000041211028,0.675909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96572375,0.009104602,0.0006949179,0.003079809,0.00030542453,0.000019072508,0.000014680382,0.000015744343,0.021041999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989386,0.0005665087,0.000031522686,0.00008786978,0.00015759934,0.0002179052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991404,0.0003647071,0.00010472097,0.00004323029,0.00014630506,0.0002006816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020137518,0.00017921651,0.00016407747,0.0014144348,0.006637,0.0052141934,0.00029401854,0.00078383303,0.00260454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013021816,0.00010536344,0.000115347735,0.0014608331,0.020595796,0.0033140085,0.0019244462,0.0023247777,0.00023236536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008534724,0.000010007168,0.00031770053,0.000026755273,0.0000014384377,0.000025993008,0.017448196,0.000023513272,0.000033667973,0.976756,0.0016836051,0.0036645746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016945738,0.000029053885,0.0047551864,0.00037617137,0.000007705205,0.00011206202,0.036880992,0.00022155317,0.00015993313,0.41743803,0.5399812,0.000021174255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019069506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028607303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019069506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009674839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005028409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07019615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015321277","doi":"","title":"Spinoza's Eudaimonism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03499452347170346,"score_gpt":0.25180671168559304,"score_spread":0.2168121882138896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015321277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014439835,0.0042721885,0.0010046045,0.030349111,0.0020844438,0.000009477369,0.000051055315,0.000048891394,0.9477403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47766617,0.0026689067,0.0006970846,0.0066241506,0.0003528565,0.00003049157,0.000053834243,0.00013414296,0.5117723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999057,0.00029849718,0.000018664134,0.00018519622,0.00015814227,0.000282425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955004,0.000110271816,0.000024931473,0.000065124375,0.00012119378,0.000128397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011192689,0.00030102764,0.0003289629,0.0006181187,0.0066374145,0.0054423483,0.0004087129,0.0011293247,0.02320299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018700174,0.00012864756,0.00019154286,0.00054134376,0.006455769,0.0028098351,0.003083572,0.003048806,0.0027432602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028810522,0.000009438137,0.00015359888,0.000017487151,0.000001887098,0.000033777484,0.0036162003,0.000019342358,0.000051804465,0.94601494,0.036978915,0.013073668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011372974,0.000009587513,0.0005183559,0.00007361136,0.0000044002422,0.000052480533,0.0038666658,0.000051041738,0.00012042782,0.075400725,0.9198851,0.0000062360727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018514343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038313143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02320299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004649327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028903685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0776217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024827411","doi":"","title":"Supuestos sexistas del carpe diem erótico y réplicas femeninas en la poesía contemporánea","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Nova scotia; Western europe","score_opus":0.017729002930377668,"score_gpt":0.22703012536262357,"score_spread":0.2093011224322459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024827411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32491207,0.009300796,0.0027317167,0.007035935,0.00027440724,0.000019039899,0.00005420963,0.000050262774,0.6556215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660609,0.0012309988,0.00038995006,0.00027894345,0.000025227506,0.000014639585,0.000010210872,0.000019892488,0.031969216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846125,0.0008113534,0.000031759468,0.00018357173,0.00023228402,0.0002797464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956316,0.00016252507,0.00006172699,0.000071130795,0.00009110068,0.000050353345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013186302,0.00031876113,0.0002252335,0.0010736658,0.0059119603,0.0039941235,0.00045121918,0.0010130854,0.0035946441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016427516,0.00016770758,0.00015068548,0.0011259757,0.024261508,0.0017342997,0.0030793913,0.0015727332,0.0002984079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057186862,0.000008633431,0.0022310943,0.00008070133,0.000006271294,0.00042784095,0.2714179,0.000104672,0.00051976007,0.7085449,0.0025956216,0.014005469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014826239,0.000055827637,0.014545501,0.00070225616,0.000021138372,0.0011018767,0.2932841,0.0001618742,0.0007135845,0.052228395,0.63711834,0.000052250114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028446052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06983671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028446052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004495637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027190761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056560934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030320098","doi":"","title":"\"Mulâtresses pionnières : trois autrices martiniquaises d’avant la Négritude\"","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Verisimilitude; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.2857083074837273,"score_gpt":0.5351768194994553,"score_spread":0.249468512015728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030320098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6941494,0.018588638,0.0014776029,0.046715777,0.0015828655,0.000060853137,0.00011492349,0.000051273342,0.23725864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8741096,0.0026327954,0.0003212665,0.0040991707,0.00018250663,0.00003156147,0.000025492993,0.000030324623,0.118567236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991726,0.00040039842,0.0000125222205,0.000076257274,0.00007334731,0.00026483933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996001,0.00010856693,0.00008634677,0.000024355923,0.00005702592,0.0001235672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011007515,0.00031521503,0.00021247166,0.0003710084,0.007961009,0.0021462261,0.00037728366,0.000983881,0.0049609267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014206066,0.00022703341,0.00013556266,0.000318914,0.0074277017,0.001077594,0.0024756722,0.0023274943,0.00044760038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009377961,0.00002372314,0.0112118395,0.00017535515,0.000008906016,0.0012924188,0.7355563,0.00004032553,0.0016727401,0.20265527,0.019981537,0.027287683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007971644,0.00005327773,0.026655119,0.00033403002,0.0000104394285,0.00054816686,0.12731662,0.00005962727,0.00046166577,0.0030324578,0.8414988,0.00002169407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075528786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23076163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075528786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033891504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002621083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15017837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7069012609","doi":"","title":"La lettre perdue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); German; Criticism; Judaism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Christianity","score_opus":0.30395072266549356,"score_gpt":0.5224977041378464,"score_spread":0.2185469814723528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7069012609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005640839,0.13668236,0.0032350211,0.04458797,0.07067245,0.00006197593,0.0014745836,0.001102552,0.7365421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033397842,0.023841653,0.0011772426,0.004848837,0.018432219,0.000082928,0.00045299457,0.00043545724,0.91733086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798656,0.00042238345,0.00007247486,0.0004621107,0.00083521893,0.00022136883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989574,0.00033398755,0.00008128159,0.0001289116,0.00029953814,0.0001988929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013132803,0.0019703254,0.0011267752,0.002035798,0.0029208448,0.0063748388,0.0009142756,0.002708382,0.19095767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030658906,0.00036668254,0.0009069118,0.0012009535,0.0017671965,0.0025163013,0.0020155972,0.0055322233,0.06678908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031727212,0.0000813721,0.0006500215,0.0004912065,0.000035375113,0.00070975366,0.0006944054,0.00046879833,0.0014773807,0.1625936,0.64079344,0.19168738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066492776,0.000010461041,0.00030721843,0.000057193538,0.000001671468,0.00017570776,0.00004088058,0.00005013883,0.00012155006,0.0011279844,0.9980956,0.000004839266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009960376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009833361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19095767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004038661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023189082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6388171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071060456","doi":"","title":"Review of \"Bayle calviniste libertin\" by Hubert Bost","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Subject (documents); Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.018875111314923275,"score_gpt":0.18871097701962858,"score_spread":0.1698358657047053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071060456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025734478,0.9672605,0.000028523227,0.017982911,0.012627911,0.0000069910643,0.00009773861,0.0000111696745,0.0019586058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00083765475,0.9402105,0.000087729386,0.030069053,0.013051599,0.000044836772,0.00029457032,0.000029919729,0.0153741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857616,0.00028449384,0.00012528485,0.00024350996,0.00060070865,0.00016990805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962302,0.0011687387,0.00042389083,0.00010260203,0.0015154238,0.0005592281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026926475,0.0015394512,0.002192535,0.004742865,0.0012004874,0.0040259315,0.0016752124,0.0025807729,0.022169035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234049,0.0008353104,0.00077442295,0.006204305,0.0013730614,0.004297337,0.002942898,0.0056667635,0.015190239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017097651,0.0000037784173,0.000025456411,0.0014668151,0.000012019276,0.000015307332,0.000037876624,0.000015616615,0.000018660861,0.0007231118,0.9605181,0.037146207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000965539,0.0000058047513,0.0002694843,0.0031168773,0.000015102859,0.00005540964,0.000041217336,0.0000059588588,0.000014910444,0.0003028481,0.99615604,0.000006734355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017938225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031316005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022169035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005550959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008765281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07416278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099381182","doi":"","title":"D E P E N","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Work (physics); Service (business); Savings account; Income tax; Social security; Tax rate; Tax deferral","score_opus":0.02804076722988872,"score_gpt":0.2269549392315318,"score_spread":0.19891417200164307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099381182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025436822,0.004461771,0.0016643476,0.02183456,0.013297623,0.00008447,0.0015243466,0.0006864137,0.95390284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022597415,0.0044435887,0.0020475448,0.010476933,0.0017108546,0.0000619898,0.0019103955,0.00033917947,0.9564121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991289,0.00007994196,0.000032704647,0.00016181586,0.00037556206,0.00022109233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861383,0.00011652262,0.000058031375,0.00015915927,0.00073504023,0.00031744808],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006581546,0.00066289766,0.00042628267,0.0017392028,0.0030466383,0.003938214,0.0012443898,0.0026339816,0.4782489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002640643,0.00028258207,0.00065810164,0.0010198846,0.0013202965,0.0019543523,0.0021337708,0.0023014587,0.21223974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008344637,0.000040010484,0.0009894228,0.00013798202,0.000012624965,0.00041846462,0.00015611287,0.00007501329,0.0009599559,0.027524825,0.85679656,0.11280566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033164902,0.000007312596,0.0003953222,0.000035029236,0.0000023225903,0.00011973812,0.00008529547,0.000027625625,0.00014032247,0.0012001188,0.99798065,0.0000028983438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03616526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054015927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5217511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032324274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048538256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100510235","doi":"","title":"Canadian Political Science Association","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.029241134369332827,"score_gpt":0.2591523115042953,"score_spread":0.22991117713496248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100510235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043808567,0.0023655994,0.00027526577,0.011899997,0.0021386752,0.00006041668,0.0036045038,0.00023211449,0.9789853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016860976,0.0009975237,0.0001501614,0.000911242,0.00011211081,0.000022376873,0.0008728372,0.00003994416,0.9952077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973929,0.00012414243,0.00008965553,0.00028570316,0.0016680349,0.000439538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403596,0.0005401323,0.00013543727,0.0005946699,0.0038241933,0.0008695933],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015334958,0.0008422502,0.0010269622,0.0040935557,0.009904963,0.008027179,0.0014531187,0.004388693,0.4989883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056876675,0.0009660807,0.0007186613,0.0057139774,0.0020829837,0.0022854654,0.0022642757,0.00460373,0.25070825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011913247,0.000019324169,0.00025408957,0.000042331376,0.0000040724267,0.000023161065,0.00005187103,0.00004142348,0.000043268174,0.022359198,0.9506885,0.026460798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030992253,0.0000011539803,0.0004743635,0.000030261746,0.0000019857146,0.0000061285473,0.00004711316,0.00004019282,0.000019442614,0.0013460726,0.9980262,0.000004000389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7864138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9104789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7864138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023052761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08014881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7146324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115927962","doi":"10.4000/15dc2","title":"Références bibliographiques","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Natural (archaeology); Legislation","score_opus":0.1075770775875879,"score_gpt":0.3381915381364123,"score_spread":0.2306144605488244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115927962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003225731,0.031010596,0.0014877443,0.0045423796,0.007419797,0.00022599607,0.066813245,0.0015978628,0.8865798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061735343,0.05070265,0.0035543195,0.0025394359,0.0039794194,0.0005379224,0.11669089,0.0019986872,0.8138232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733007,0.00037631547,0.00029101406,0.00030616444,0.0014877776,0.0002085854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948329,0.0008450394,0.0003491783,0.0005950252,0.0031420505,0.00023590203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011351482,0.0012015164,0.001578271,0.027345872,0.0027349228,0.0102658495,0.0023819574,0.001518349,0.63550013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007844042,0.00067813165,0.0006968361,0.04709204,0.0011967248,0.004506268,0.002383222,0.0027420775,0.43867227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013744614,0.000011112335,0.00007048194,0.0007170574,0.000004256921,0.00004578166,0.00018790233,0.00005794552,0.00007795057,0.01066909,0.9458125,0.042332094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017184589,9.1278673e-7,0.00010699716,0.00036760163,0.0000014801784,0.000024894684,0.000078473866,0.000008046044,0.000013573058,0.0006699093,0.9987225,0.0000038226744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039880246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037582263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63550013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074169305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006248876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5199148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133058818","doi":"","title":"Democracy&apos;s great opponent, the problem of oligarchy in ancient and modern political thought","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oligarchy; Politics; Power (physics); Field (mathematics); Clientelism; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.06267648772991907,"score_gpt":0.3323432460802996,"score_spread":0.2696667583503805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133058818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007425883,0.086934954,0.0017802209,0.60041285,0.012099414,0.000033885393,0.0005557737,0.00013287712,0.2906242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19547388,0.0499082,0.0011539926,0.025213124,0.011629731,0.000059034573,0.00017066489,0.00024762613,0.7161438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994355,0.00015777202,0.000020655692,0.000087324646,0.00020234715,0.000096523334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826753,0.0009499946,0.000114252885,0.00008403898,0.0003117517,0.00027233252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011271016,0.00034571646,0.0004267795,0.00073393824,0.0062710703,0.006474198,0.000636901,0.003513972,0.017046763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036939338,0.00046364564,0.0001933879,0.0016064559,0.007119915,0.0037058478,0.0009574302,0.004260773,0.0019700008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019088462,0.000012031804,0.00024912306,0.000073916664,0.000005937895,0.00004967421,0.0018864312,0.0001306251,0.000045920282,0.32273808,0.6610555,0.013733678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038209477,0.000006620394,0.0017986026,0.00020090702,0.000013221061,0.000049423496,0.002417447,0.00026938072,0.00016462799,0.08639139,0.9086318,0.00001832484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24105763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43423882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24105763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010750913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073491796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47930902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160234567","doi":"10.17323/1728-192x-2025-4-206-226","title":"The Contractian Approach to Global Justice: A Critical Overview","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Order (exchange); State (computer science); Element (criminal law); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11238520618723818,"score_gpt":0.4035522586064642,"score_spread":0.291167052419226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160234567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014855463,0.1924009,0.025790742,0.18271671,0.0034208228,0.0001896512,0.000112611895,0.000058871785,0.58045423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74489397,0.18042819,0.0062897136,0.026392413,0.0082195625,0.0005176519,0.00012605215,0.00023563547,0.03289683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943204,0.0029531817,0.00013650654,0.00037598293,0.0014299658,0.00078389747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954906,0.003414846,0.00021613613,0.00016620559,0.0005011929,0.00021109634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070912396,0.00087825453,0.0006851919,0.0068334173,0.010416745,0.010639377,0.0019151369,0.005703254,0.0040605925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006267235,0.00036934818,0.0007954563,0.0066624214,0.04535671,0.014210029,0.004620193,0.009330975,0.00049025606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013348064,0.0000039747897,0.000027040325,0.00002414922,9.3697884e-7,0.000022556738,0.0014001084,0.000075096905,0.0000060221582,0.9956204,0.0018204935,0.0009978554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005027101,0.000009480238,0.0002638685,0.0005122498,0.0000039714882,0.00011883939,0.004997148,0.0006157483,0.000046056124,0.81984067,0.17357317,0.000013771753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025091331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014405804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025091331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024917658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010155187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18079114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W749902800","doi":"","title":"Pistis - The common Ethos?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Faith; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Term (time); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.04358207401460808,"score_gpt":0.22012463142148667,"score_spread":0.17654255740687858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W749902800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05772956,0.004211438,0.025221255,0.07759595,0.0016920775,0.00007522973,0.00007235166,0.00009380222,0.8333084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785952,0.000708756,0.0013688011,0.002029925,0.00032854266,0.0000518599,0.000024778648,0.000037425598,0.016854638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875201,0.0072959564,0.00047958968,0.0012601617,0.0022635804,0.0011805869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949132,0.0021523163,0.00071360415,0.0008421783,0.000820001,0.00055860763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009860214,0.00040955303,0.00053994777,0.0012560382,0.0066967895,0.011024479,0.0009375004,0.0035263598,0.008708725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012864492,0.00028852033,0.00041867635,0.0016448387,0.046723384,0.013604106,0.00836728,0.0059420215,0.0012806405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013311595,0.0000054399684,0.00018641722,0.000024685965,0.000002701007,0.000056702804,0.0062227496,0.000042914373,0.000045586712,0.98808414,0.0018626536,0.003452752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027702898,0.000049623417,0.0011943378,0.00047807628,0.000012904464,0.0003409361,0.027838789,0.0006365253,0.00043973452,0.74855214,0.22040272,0.00002640282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002928412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002433245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011024479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069002174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052146435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7504039","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1457110","title":"Bayle Between Spinoza and Rousseau","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"General will; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0239380824950101,"score_gpt":0.2445615588172139,"score_spread":0.2206234763222038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7504039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066341326,0.015441802,0.0034199767,0.057725105,0.0036536609,0.00002518122,0.0001499852,0.00020409953,0.8530389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.615708,0.001964535,0.0012993864,0.0052802637,0.00054367364,0.000023270157,0.000044485227,0.0001860923,0.3749503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927145,0.00019617018,0.000013288352,0.00018183951,0.00010653105,0.00023067328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968123,0.00009092048,0.000030896637,0.000054705746,0.00007048932,0.0000718271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000781988,0.00034039674,0.00045406158,0.0007762563,0.009287408,0.005561965,0.00040167663,0.0021449286,0.018376226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017114672,0.0002070497,0.00029115903,0.000709804,0.006552205,0.0030063146,0.0025249873,0.0040567666,0.0019237587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068525595,0.000010842872,0.00021138573,0.000016628901,0.0000046767423,0.00010026808,0.0029756173,0.000039519047,0.00011908275,0.9667753,0.018842552,0.010835539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026038791,0.000020949492,0.0013004302,0.00009350925,0.000006758507,0.00013557838,0.0032704987,0.00011536647,0.00027378363,0.06694544,0.92779094,0.000020725278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065343216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11653286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065343216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008010822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033918186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12992573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77460314","doi":"10.22329/p.v7i2.3822","title":"Affirmation and Negativity in Spinoza: A Response to Hasana Sharp","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.06651573925094963,"score_gpt":0.281588408400533,"score_spread":0.2150726691495834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77460314","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033408927,0.013386945,0.00066229334,0.948902,0.003965241,0.000005148578,0.000018272594,0.000013905578,0.029705223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32959396,0.0123409135,0.001131549,0.5987756,0.012248732,0.00007937344,0.000026163903,0.00020715133,0.04559656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962584,0.0020888245,0.00012460533,0.000636369,0.00043104053,0.00046088264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98639584,0.01129828,0.00029154032,0.00038031532,0.0010421271,0.0005919556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072848764,0.0005663481,0.0010492761,0.0009665397,0.015892006,0.012449483,0.0016018503,0.016996516,0.008970762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012680425,0.00042444014,0.00047737654,0.0014905724,0.043581456,0.022730358,0.006360134,0.025980907,0.0011414819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004144466,0.000018295319,0.00014834572,0.00006132488,0.0000063640045,0.00013384024,0.026521647,0.000049483413,0.00007094326,0.80797535,0.16054109,0.0044318484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042090353,0.000011125426,0.000318654,0.00038036585,0.0000119499855,0.00014429708,0.036506955,0.00017956845,0.00022856158,0.41052493,0.5515973,0.000054212902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016044782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02152918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016996516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054701488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04963368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93289058","doi":"","title":"Leibniz and Toulmin: Rationalism without Dogmas (Pluralism, Pragmatism, and Gradualism)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Argumentative; Pragmatism; Pluralism (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Situated; Principle of rationality; Rationalism; Argumentation theory; Ecological rationality; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03525083964006528,"score_gpt":0.2272521932237552,"score_spread":0.19200135358368992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93289058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10489254,0.06508783,0.21066843,0.14486888,0.0020640169,0.00010464047,0.00012334966,0.0002150327,0.4719752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574042,0.005558578,0.017476168,0.0029197226,0.000649905,0.000107690954,0.000019901721,0.000049295017,0.01581447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674016,0.0018862651,0.00013431317,0.00033341502,0.0007221772,0.00018375563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971301,0.0019369284,0.0002808831,0.00029703294,0.00024290886,0.00011208948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006842118,0.00036264106,0.00042457995,0.0017143837,0.0026905572,0.005777408,0.0006878548,0.002574932,0.0014079001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008403249,0.00028309738,0.0005764977,0.0015232459,0.035841152,0.008370374,0.0032523647,0.0031211642,0.00029247164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027207766,0.0000019504091,0.000029989702,0.000007078896,0.0000014640497,0.000007140345,0.00041572418,0.00009377061,0.000018629431,0.9976921,0.0004320099,0.0012974852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037120221,0.0000030504864,0.000047070764,0.000015732214,0.0000015940744,0.000007722918,0.00011963366,0.0001613345,0.000055653712,0.9926507,0.006931139,0.000002696377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034103845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031031806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006842118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005864877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030052543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04255283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W951934208","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-9385-1_8","title":"Rationalism Versus Subjective Experience: The Problem of the Two Minds in Spinoza","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellect; Nothing; Identity (music); Rationalism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06252983022880372,"score_gpt":0.2745039343903966,"score_spread":0.2119741041615929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W951934208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0766712,0.011140963,0.044697896,0.07339746,0.0009467042,0.000048230388,0.00013870951,0.00010410979,0.7928548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97789735,0.0011227642,0.004522264,0.0020466186,0.000279442,0.000055565863,0.000032042844,0.00006706934,0.013976825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662125,0.0021591648,0.00009807545,0.0004220251,0.0004133301,0.00028613492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967367,0.002274479,0.0001602501,0.0003346119,0.00027811772,0.00021571333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004334812,0.00046645704,0.00076368917,0.001288223,0.005243983,0.013355444,0.0011843725,0.0034919658,0.005329444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005438202,0.00043425988,0.0005128801,0.0010423497,0.04955676,0.015435273,0.0036552951,0.005730681,0.00050083303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007631471,0.000004118849,0.00004175013,0.000008898861,0.000001632331,0.000009154831,0.0025032023,0.000020352278,0.000017912533,0.99598545,0.0004173166,0.0009825861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011573674,0.0000038344615,0.00012175191,0.000031131396,0.000004054838,0.000025138588,0.0022512004,0.00016766532,0.00003882943,0.9872154,0.010122547,0.000006776446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006785624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058071115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013355444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043284884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026387963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03140551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W952097696","doi":"10.3917/aphi.674.0629","title":"Droits individuels ou droit des peuples ?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de Philosophie","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04900510661809122,"score_gpt":0.2655128374881089,"score_spread":0.21650773087001768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W952097696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05751516,0.003277354,0.004654607,0.017896947,0.0007760127,0.00003391576,0.00015081442,0.000041047857,0.9156541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74588466,0.0021002083,0.0012228364,0.0031314255,0.00027800575,0.000048921152,0.00010132378,0.000068368965,0.24716422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976599,0.0008215072,0.0000796616,0.00060919597,0.00035558763,0.00047412206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992669,0.00015280886,0.00012950799,0.00018581972,0.00014596178,0.000118993135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017075259,0.0002861038,0.00033606382,0.00075513497,0.005802092,0.0072643217,0.00080498593,0.0013868285,0.020118173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033121426,0.0002501209,0.0001735721,0.0010559473,0.014607795,0.007937108,0.004198865,0.0024320313,0.002673994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010386083,0.000005950142,0.0005321472,0.000015549986,0.0000027663975,0.00006123896,0.011919412,0.000023479444,0.000054327815,0.97744125,0.0029308836,0.0070025385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102152235,0.00002396,0.0024026004,0.00022304707,0.000008925721,0.0001926909,0.034178447,0.000084897794,0.00032578,0.21930294,0.7432242,0.000022208715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018904312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026681112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020118173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004205875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037619022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06730199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W961446640","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511529276.015","title":"Newton and Spinoza and the Bible Scholarship of the Day","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Literature; Philosophy; History; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.040238637750939873,"score_gpt":0.19210889145357438,"score_spread":0.15187025370263452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W961446640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066170297,0.07981079,0.0005567811,0.040364332,0.0022317378,0.000006064777,0.00004057494,0.00003978795,0.87033284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27399293,0.041047722,0.0012637073,0.012673811,0.0026873455,0.00004410927,0.00006065066,0.000079068224,0.66815066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938285,0.00027420494,0.00001632616,0.00004575197,0.00019646111,0.00008440924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927884,0.0003763815,0.000068390334,0.000049239647,0.00008907743,0.00013804401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057461305,0.0002929265,0.00027759763,0.000957029,0.005967008,0.0051781256,0.00036408988,0.0015882615,0.01258406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014691302,0.00014760549,0.00011223485,0.0010422618,0.011790909,0.0033912074,0.0015056037,0.0026789438,0.0015999486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012671241,0.000013728869,0.00011397127,0.00007944179,0.0000015529461,0.000052504656,0.008727713,0.000029092216,0.000060936105,0.9129345,0.06337958,0.014594383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046148357,0.0000049438245,0.00042171936,0.00021673138,0.0000014373594,0.000053779037,0.0020204794,0.000030203979,0.0000426337,0.083923966,0.9132756,0.0000039604383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014047901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040788814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014047901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073766555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046086838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053521633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W997017743","doi":"","title":"Quentin Skinner , Hobbes and Republican Liberty . Reviewed by","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.017255223113490512,"score_gpt":0.21745054909058695,"score_spread":0.20019532597709644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W997017743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027912916,0.946004,0.00010845335,0.037236355,0.0045926156,0.0000016817041,0.000041505664,0.000005624417,0.011730692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020211818,0.9310853,0.00015592384,0.01241493,0.011399535,0.000010684634,0.0000808704,0.0000269546,0.024614025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996277,0.00014472172,0.000020507376,0.000067478395,0.00009065251,0.000048869188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873453,0.00086767075,0.00007817974,0.000040301515,0.00019824262,0.000081062826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006293632,0.00079672504,0.0007015263,0.0018412503,0.0019408597,0.0023507378,0.00096103706,0.0033806185,0.02094363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019894512,0.000432963,0.00024046029,0.0034916056,0.0036256884,0.004701716,0.0011013,0.0037482826,0.0040682964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044118166,0.000018887045,0.0002637902,0.0010417758,0.000021997519,0.000093062605,0.001491496,0.00016902032,0.000084198466,0.10250213,0.829809,0.06446039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013967426,0.0000062976533,0.0013754049,0.0017271246,0.000010460739,0.00013289296,0.0015625703,0.00006948609,0.000077467594,0.030146345,0.9648644,0.000013653619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014159881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041001335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02094363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020513819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016847117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07006347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}