{"meta":{"query_hash":"fab0cddf0b4a","filters":{"venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fab0cddf0b4a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%C2%98The+%C2%9CGeorge+Washington+international+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W210339887","doi":"","title":"Participation of Developing Countries in the International Climate Change Regime: Lessons for the Future","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Treaty; Greenhouse gas; Developing country; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Climate change; Population; Political science; Convention; Conference of the parties; Montreal Protocol; International law; International trade; Law; Development economics; Economic growth; Business; Geography; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025773193799549426,"score_gpt":0.2990293236464349,"score_spread":0.2732561298468855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W210339887","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015330226,0.17909333,0.002256913,0.61442834,0.0052748905,0.000040966606,0.0004408185,0.00004964425,0.18308479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6103786,0.27088764,0.0029540618,0.080835365,0.0072362544,0.00025061844,0.00063184893,0.00006941175,0.026756193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836737,0.00078145124,0.000041244115,0.0001444322,0.0002294096,0.0004359441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972867,0.0010701102,0.0002186128,0.00015438646,0.0004679761,0.0008022755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004599997,0.00033807644,0.0004082147,0.00084766635,0.0026801124,0.0071909213,0.0013305258,0.004608498,0.015090166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046250904,0.0001291228,0.0003548495,0.0022259366,0.0065193297,0.009935536,0.0042484724,0.005058762,0.0012791815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011741832,0.000115492134,0.0046667824,0.0009062812,0.000017424853,0.0003289208,0.006738403,0.000652019,0.00020303666,0.6661601,0.12734024,0.19275382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015439698,0.000029431812,0.003927654,0.0032048635,0.000008168555,0.0001367474,0.014057625,0.00028097854,0.00012415089,0.20122813,0.7769574,0.000029322437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062767663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045274645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015090166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003281216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061585666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050481617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W225835283","doi":"","title":"En Ruta Hacia El Desarrollo: The Emerging Secondary Mortgage Market in Latin America","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Emerging markets; Business; Financial system; Commercial mortgage-backed security; Latin Americans; Finance; Secondary market; Structured finance; Economics; Financial crisis; Political science; Real estate; Real estate investment trust","score_opus":0.018520585308043833,"score_gpt":0.24451646810257188,"score_spread":0.22599588279452804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W225835283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46250537,0.046190094,0.0011058749,0.1462093,0.0006461271,0.00005503386,0.00056087313,0.000080962454,0.3426463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9010716,0.028419523,0.00078815245,0.008215099,0.0009450053,0.00004426733,0.0004590906,0.00005348369,0.060003825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997472,0.000068061316,0.000007904318,0.000029256704,0.000057283596,0.00009030351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994659,0.00011123654,0.00014995932,0.000021559827,0.00012248232,0.0001288474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008654296,0.000210011,0.00019935051,0.0008839407,0.0015589494,0.00573809,0.00047787346,0.0013749897,0.009519154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010411439,0.000092339375,0.00019227003,0.0013690653,0.002058876,0.003796033,0.001389878,0.0016409454,0.00051782076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015606562,0.00030223196,0.058746304,0.00042568706,0.000019072522,0.0045572473,0.039777495,0.0005741462,0.0031264692,0.6769579,0.08119025,0.1341671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015283284,0.000038106587,0.06196449,0.0005041721,0.000008866628,0.00066936226,0.036107555,0.0007199048,0.00046744797,0.013861827,0.88561636,0.000026635409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029516967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03406065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029516967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040939464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024485376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05869031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233219730","doi":"","title":"Potential Conflicts between Investor Rights and Environmental Regulation under NAFTA's Chapter 11","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Intellectual property; Government procurement; Investment (military); Business; Government (linguistics); Free trade; Dispute resolution; Tariff; Procurement; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01852598104953121,"score_gpt":0.26542421909602065,"score_spread":0.24689823804648944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233219730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014115687,0.010497239,0.0029798942,0.08250968,0.0014255082,0.00018582887,0.0003664235,0.00006782945,0.88785195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44563323,0.022119967,0.0108751375,0.102372594,0.0041992357,0.0013783851,0.0009051394,0.00008980565,0.41242656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99197197,0.0024356677,0.00055524055,0.00069121696,0.0030026129,0.0013432922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99018717,0.006616319,0.0009226675,0.00048901973,0.0015886293,0.00019625662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012313973,0.0003422383,0.00033745318,0.0009614542,0.00444091,0.01151198,0.0019701049,0.014324288,0.01163608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01551497,0.00055619463,0.00054829393,0.0014491148,0.0040335176,0.0033328815,0.0023140856,0.0056009623,0.001440307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010969754,0.000026251755,0.0007373674,0.00008842865,0.0000059104004,0.00023080701,0.0020545656,0.00020568867,0.00019647421,0.92509186,0.05782066,0.013531081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015095294,0.00003323764,0.0017270403,0.0012206701,0.000021002697,0.00023824869,0.0014331533,0.000371676,0.00034888534,0.101061195,0.8934908,0.00003908888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017630838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027657866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017630838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004094991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008528345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06512332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W237515160","doi":"","title":"U.S. International Tax Administration & Developing Nations: Administrative Policy at the Crossroads","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Tax policy; International taxation; Economics; Business; Tax reform; Public administration; Law; Economic policy; Public economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03810425153992238,"score_gpt":0.30904926659586596,"score_spread":0.2709450150559436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W237515160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066091497,0.04006503,0.0023062741,0.3206752,0.010267673,0.00015924814,0.00076422887,0.00023984897,0.61891335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13248366,0.07100593,0.011477219,0.13005097,0.005214873,0.00048515567,0.0010279173,0.00029762342,0.64795667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961635,0.0011968731,0.0002842987,0.0004167341,0.0011182592,0.00082038844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946202,0.0017752829,0.0005946121,0.00045835014,0.0019205448,0.00063099165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006450513,0.0005565091,0.00045447424,0.002169057,0.009410789,0.0163198,0.0009320346,0.0074759517,0.027361766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106803775,0.0005300089,0.00040936898,0.00543358,0.0031694164,0.008007031,0.0021392107,0.008385114,0.009092725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002097116,0.000065197346,0.0018898892,0.0001113076,0.000007537107,0.00012371292,0.0012052967,0.000208457,0.00019914594,0.6141553,0.32836705,0.053646054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003007025,0.000011117355,0.0013050142,0.00020532764,0.0000043379446,0.000048400812,0.0006838588,0.00010142891,0.00013109174,0.009751431,0.98774314,0.000011802848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062333405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062333405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010287553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027316088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12394118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238122678","doi":"","title":"The Landmark 2006 Unclos Annex VII Barbados/trinidad and Tobago Maritime Delimitation (Jurisdiction & Merits) Award","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Law; International court; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Charter; Political science; International law; Sociology; Public international law","score_opus":0.007686793036918232,"score_gpt":0.2536388572695829,"score_spread":0.24595206423266466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238122678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049044373,0.003875946,0.00096877996,0.09779248,0.03503812,0.0003340051,0.003709531,0.0003691726,0.8530076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0099461265,0.0008663323,0.0004788155,0.007403567,0.000974318,0.000094356365,0.0009923596,0.00012417337,0.97912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851304,0.000103323655,0.000033390155,0.000128486,0.00070820795,0.00051345315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980149,0.0001411195,0.00007041599,0.00009352218,0.0011515098,0.00052848196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021487428,0.0005337997,0.0005025927,0.0009102963,0.004796801,0.0057341,0.0016228565,0.0051712547,0.0758657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00441323,0.00045352906,0.00032163181,0.0009920998,0.0011674305,0.0014374665,0.0018403339,0.005828226,0.03526687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011086103,0.000014434522,0.000196781,0.000015773128,8.313452e-7,0.000039594237,0.000048414444,0.000047243382,0.00006729851,0.007179621,0.98637843,0.0060004173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048295406,0.000005305422,0.0008715446,0.000055425244,0.0000010572551,0.000011457831,0.00020747958,0.000047698322,0.000053982727,0.00064609025,0.99808854,0.000006533944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28588146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5639509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28588146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011553389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022498097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5684349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W242160138","doi":"","title":"Icj Review of Security Council Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International court; Politics; Political science; Security council; Law; Economic Justice; Judicial review; International law; Public administration; Public international law","score_opus":0.04658642805948117,"score_gpt":0.32679038181469433,"score_spread":0.2802039537552132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W242160138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008234395,0.018898502,0.0057717403,0.16093466,0.0357759,0.0016866949,0.0013799915,0.00065426994,0.7666639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18292326,0.028283479,0.012685246,0.16768548,0.040564407,0.0020362458,0.004018826,0.0008949681,0.5609081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90479267,0.015794903,0.011369852,0.0073397164,0.049977925,0.010724868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.786567,0.039216045,0.008734903,0.017947474,0.1388414,0.008693144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0511715,0.0009357963,0.0018156681,0.01207202,0.013124989,0.020932619,0.005004217,0.020671641,0.018628826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1713935,0.0013630079,0.0013075311,0.008925288,0.005466324,0.004985992,0.0057196803,0.01545816,0.012258659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033185428,0.00003852078,0.0008033923,0.00024830727,0.000028957074,0.0007618954,0.0009809019,0.0002748676,0.0003894206,0.07445449,0.8893834,0.03260264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015487163,0.00001750651,0.0010980462,0.0005000361,0.000018927103,0.00013726356,0.00027091597,0.0003693777,0.00035357126,0.004928715,0.99223924,0.00005102224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052792594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06438004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052792594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02173521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071387455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27062398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W245906344","doi":"","title":"Coming out of the Maze: Canada Grants the Harvard Mouse Patent","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Animal Genetics and Reproduction","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Appeal; Supreme court; Patent Act; Law; Patentable subject matter; Statutory law; Political science; Commonwealth; Legislation; Patent office; Patent troll; Patent law; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Sociology","score_opus":0.019952679154585217,"score_gpt":0.23873133338436373,"score_spread":0.21877865422977852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W245906344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021885537,0.023920331,0.002145736,0.22896554,0.0053663743,0.00015825416,0.0013782738,0.00038937738,0.7157907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36448598,0.029783813,0.00370294,0.14589639,0.0038147897,0.00017670523,0.0009394788,0.00027917436,0.4509206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929582,0.00038168897,0.00012795241,0.0006295673,0.004647222,0.0012553524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994833,0.0015761068,0.00018667709,0.0002720833,0.0020750782,0.0010571156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003761241,0.00044216285,0.00043955978,0.0025559256,0.009431313,0.01039909,0.0025166532,0.009179107,0.024428735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009853438,0.00045190944,0.00051413337,0.0028754591,0.010026564,0.0032426144,0.0026654266,0.0046350304,0.0022587648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080166166,0.000040369712,0.0021434058,0.00012710679,0.000017826249,0.00050632353,0.0010184242,0.00019032201,0.0012075093,0.5198337,0.4330931,0.04174177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003242703,0.000032063093,0.0033806681,0.00028188265,0.000033087705,0.000111601585,0.00045609105,0.00019034266,0.0006411797,0.017410714,0.9773785,0.000051487026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8731601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92270154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12683988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052167308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07631392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37850213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W250370597","doi":"","title":"Extraterritorial Enforcement of Pipeda: A Multi-Tiered Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Personally identifiable information; Law; Business; Enforcement; Privacy law; Possession (linguistics); European union; Population; Law enforcement; Directive; Information privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Sociology","score_opus":0.031117268261724635,"score_gpt":0.3390862629733977,"score_spread":0.3079689947116731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W250370597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6274482,0.007459243,0.03674021,0.015927626,0.00027632463,0.0021762368,0.0069293524,0.0003781671,0.30266464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98208237,0.00088371,0.003145033,0.0015098872,0.00013072613,0.00017399779,0.0008574451,0.000057925277,0.011158897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97173125,0.007484401,0.0012734516,0.0028261058,0.009114182,0.007570643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88395375,0.058150362,0.022551648,0.008481732,0.02363359,0.0032289643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025657617,0.000637956,0.0012079932,0.005699132,0.003800138,0.009818811,0.00459505,0.002900528,0.027916044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057459004,0.0007905663,0.0031548578,0.00718879,0.00497774,0.006248503,0.004979493,0.0033013143,0.0014690456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055673247,0.00057323015,0.41189966,0.00072929455,0.0007261943,0.001221925,0.0044488763,0.008310972,0.00070544396,0.49891433,0.017056994,0.05485635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018653755,0.0009224024,0.68988574,0.0015431733,0.0026666468,0.0010923209,0.024195472,0.0641164,0.0019462162,0.13432914,0.07882136,0.00029459607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19430543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12885717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8056946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012957121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014891883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38634884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W259213304","doi":"","title":"Shelter from the Storm: Rethinking Diplomatic Protection of Dual Nationals in Modern International Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Torture; Prison; Terrorism; Political science; Nationality; Deportation; Foreign national; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Immigration","score_opus":0.03374380977550418,"score_gpt":0.31369496484041054,"score_spread":0.27995115506490637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W259213304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07816888,0.009164361,0.012525026,0.23594712,0.0047741383,0.00013531646,0.00004803494,0.00019726544,0.6590398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044257,0.0022239063,0.0027470342,0.056948982,0.0016302227,0.00017101564,0.000024874667,0.0001398159,0.031688552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918487,0.004339194,0.00017516928,0.0007519706,0.0011521246,0.0017327593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883243,0.0077489717,0.0006653452,0.0013618148,0.00082495745,0.0010746645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011612748,0.0003520823,0.00034406604,0.0012991169,0.020165801,0.015678624,0.0026003395,0.010819643,0.007891065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019361466,0.0004318719,0.00039811194,0.0009664508,0.05184815,0.014918761,0.011087353,0.013644727,0.0007586097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022073891,0.00002727837,0.0005524513,0.000056051435,0.0000032533849,0.00017319166,0.06414316,0.0000763996,0.00018382749,0.88481283,0.032588776,0.017360607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038244165,0.000054885408,0.0017201228,0.0012056921,0.000019400542,0.00024769237,0.089703016,0.0006088468,0.00050179544,0.270167,0.63568157,0.000051616702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019542066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03875139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020165801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010676997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01067095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07746738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267706274","doi":"","title":"Home Is Where the Heart Is: Sexual Orientation Discrimination and the Right to Adequate Housing in International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Housing discrimination; Law; Norm (philosophy); International law; Ethnic group; Political science; Transgender; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.031053374202722212,"score_gpt":0.34525798230168614,"score_spread":0.31420460809896394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W267706274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045549337,0.1569149,0.0013385873,0.21368924,0.0070424387,0.00004971181,0.0002317656,0.000026752065,0.57515734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85478806,0.07013122,0.0005598925,0.025551088,0.011353329,0.000099192686,0.00016183985,0.000024858742,0.03733045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857175,0.0007210445,0.000053257754,0.00016248562,0.00024491912,0.00024663482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974976,0.0014108173,0.00044263154,0.00007093365,0.00020878206,0.00036926314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017633227,0.00024730503,0.00021802951,0.0014047199,0.003170979,0.00571018,0.000836209,0.0040504485,0.011327972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024444852,0.00015987518,0.00018034173,0.0021137905,0.010899315,0.0055330945,0.0031708903,0.0041462043,0.0006375068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021161544,0.00008702477,0.004977032,0.00023518165,0.000005076964,0.00033956824,0.012390602,0.00012119595,0.000070891925,0.8658207,0.07230636,0.043625273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016010097,0.00010241505,0.025183493,0.0053082565,0.00002111556,0.0009290887,0.03461755,0.000644057,0.00013883672,0.3119903,0.620991,0.00005788901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008147057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010623097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011327972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028997683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021143034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03789586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W271657514","doi":"","title":"Defamation, the Media, and Free Speech: Australia's Experiment with Expanded Qualified Privilege","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Democracy; Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.044667415491101155,"score_gpt":0.3342720033940464,"score_spread":0.28960458790294524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W271657514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42175665,0.01094817,0.0033786185,0.15657316,0.001202537,0.00016468804,0.000052169617,0.000089155,0.40583494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85933363,0.0042286078,0.002028119,0.034478508,0.00050026696,0.00016921449,0.00001619791,0.00005580171,0.09918968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929811,0.0029843112,0.00018235187,0.0007247953,0.0016805797,0.0014469767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910484,0.0056662103,0.00034292362,0.00060484954,0.00066264323,0.0016749718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076202294,0.00030180666,0.00034035082,0.0008848011,0.016030254,0.008676576,0.0012981768,0.007089326,0.011641879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012382332,0.00056304416,0.0003804559,0.00075810996,0.012715613,0.00973787,0.009914788,0.008864365,0.00080474396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021547622,0.00039566544,0.004803133,0.0002179582,0.000017312374,0.0021929143,0.16231464,0.00027831958,0.0024159087,0.67611873,0.026878988,0.12415097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012556204,0.00070417766,0.024726102,0.0007272725,0.000046274585,0.0010293205,0.036232673,0.0015057555,0.0021440857,0.13971578,0.792897,0.00014592063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08480425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19142132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08480425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008961927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016076341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16862124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W287486819","doi":"","title":"India and International Arbitration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Presentation (obstetrics); Law; Wife; Framing (construction); Test (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; History; Political science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.01748382701819914,"score_gpt":0.2563181981805371,"score_spread":0.23883437116233794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W287486819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062707523,0.012023596,0.00032627108,0.019072479,0.00089779973,0.000013839469,0.00006472399,0.000038210652,0.9612922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5250489,0.0067500076,0.00054808374,0.010663623,0.0013065112,0.000064696644,0.00012560359,0.00010494393,0.45538756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997246,0.00082439533,0.00010726102,0.00040567268,0.00047516968,0.00094158325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884146,0.0003972925,0.00014028074,0.00023094418,0.00013582414,0.00025425892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021248488,0.00039002896,0.00042440774,0.0012975526,0.007523338,0.012142998,0.0009127663,0.0033037018,0.049809646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037030496,0.00021819003,0.00042223348,0.0021259168,0.009311583,0.0034636245,0.0053770957,0.0048744623,0.0038609365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008669676,0.000007831609,0.00034969317,0.00002133563,0.000003311523,0.00007309158,0.0013521396,0.000030693758,0.000023351162,0.96903247,0.022320287,0.0067770756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076066394,0.000010606121,0.0019649274,0.00015448447,0.000006766285,0.00017023624,0.0025349795,0.00009810289,0.0001194285,0.06796419,0.92695785,0.000010755969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096755335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014266603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049809646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006103223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036727656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16662985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W291686183","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review in Canadian Constitutional Law: A Brief Overview","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Law; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Statute; Legitimacy; Judicial activism; Jurisdiction; Judicial independence; Constitution; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.033522867881349325,"score_gpt":0.32204463749535595,"score_spread":0.2885217696140066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W291686183","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003909733,0.6059769,0.0043180725,0.0751371,0.0038840512,0.00027518877,0.00046314156,0.00014334888,0.3058925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116865814,0.7989218,0.0058857827,0.018470034,0.0044322107,0.00018926432,0.0003872917,0.00014080259,0.054707065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868377,0.0021045948,0.0006421841,0.00093342166,0.0067865695,0.0026955542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848193,0.00519608,0.0007368379,0.000320238,0.0076788403,0.0012487229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073270253,0.0008135108,0.0008808588,0.01627311,0.015003637,0.013230078,0.0028709592,0.005954633,0.009604126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01604927,0.001039473,0.0007598324,0.029012017,0.01395642,0.0042561507,0.0024543563,0.0043868287,0.0011791172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028913255,0.000060543403,0.0021558993,0.0016143783,0.000020293508,0.000702438,0.003942145,0.0012478238,0.00016918282,0.62071085,0.20161285,0.16773467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062225836,0.000011952859,0.0035937098,0.0010927048,0.000012042,0.00017252634,0.0006902117,0.00037389432,0.000062515894,0.009377838,0.98455596,0.0000504118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96797144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18819788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18819788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23256311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303990125","doi":"","title":"Frozen Assets: Ownership of Arctic Mineral Rights Must Be Resolved to Prevent the Really Cold War","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; Natural resource; Law; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Jurisdiction; Political science; International law; Natural resource economics; Oceanography; Geology; Economics","score_opus":0.027052695408656544,"score_gpt":0.3230248346962451,"score_spread":0.29597213928758853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303990125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01609456,0.013036304,0.0041169813,0.28966326,0.01151749,0.000054948465,0.00018266562,0.00010264962,0.66523117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50633657,0.023006579,0.0040787705,0.135747,0.0073000747,0.00012099904,0.0004906356,0.00015416647,0.3227652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802375,0.00047971142,0.00008790995,0.00017820307,0.00058586546,0.00064456457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970215,0.00067649153,0.00028868538,0.0001586508,0.0009933119,0.0008614387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029225938,0.00029482468,0.0002227814,0.00047267618,0.0062477007,0.009321006,0.0011745649,0.0058719846,0.028131992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007408826,0.00018885938,0.00023509009,0.0005030094,0.0051693665,0.006402277,0.004481161,0.0051557426,0.0049542557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003161744,0.00004010561,0.002271582,0.00015465284,0.000007016044,0.0004796069,0.0029482674,0.00025278004,0.00034968948,0.52866364,0.38785473,0.076946415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006022323,0.000024511899,0.0015684362,0.0008406405,0.000007591585,0.00029957987,0.0055836113,0.0002059218,0.00027910178,0.07146351,0.91969925,0.000021875538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029807694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04052376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029807694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004446053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013380707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094110906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125982139","doi":"","title":"Democratizing the WTO","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Globalization; CONTEST; Politics; Law; Legitimacy; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02359669875026992,"score_gpt":0.3074491851300884,"score_spread":0.28385248637981847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125982139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005840493,0.017712977,0.013443578,0.18961324,0.007832034,0.00009529107,0.00031561707,0.0002724279,0.7648745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46196607,0.024951875,0.011657327,0.10653656,0.014253367,0.00038696962,0.000737576,0.00071791833,0.37879235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880356,0.0045666476,0.0004434601,0.0018467428,0.0038732598,0.0012342054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928933,0.0031757976,0.00064394873,0.0013584985,0.0012631301,0.0006653137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102382805,0.0009504351,0.0004422777,0.0014230452,0.0037610515,0.01084362,0.0015159631,0.0085468395,0.02422632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018570544,0.00032897136,0.00045671625,0.0015054754,0.010169086,0.0074429456,0.005712512,0.010212639,0.0055956137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012497677,0.00002153792,0.00020666872,0.00009194207,0.000009751466,0.00009596637,0.0006237184,0.0006547943,0.00021799754,0.90923375,0.07169431,0.017136985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005551919,0.000014061373,0.00019978335,0.00027391754,0.0000043776236,0.000057267825,0.00024811976,0.00045576016,0.00022642067,0.2600108,0.7384939,0.000009989795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034617765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032890253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02422632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005103158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070141004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08104509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317641462","doi":"","title":"THE OECD CONTRIBUTION TO THE EVOLUTION OF TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY TRADE LAW[dagger]","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Subsidy; Negotiation; International trade law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Economics","score_opus":0.016430507821249614,"score_gpt":0.26911798621206134,"score_spread":0.25268747839081174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W317641462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017952124,0.07961777,0.0027456968,0.26139587,0.029321093,0.000050429764,0.00058675074,0.0003047773,0.62418246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10652473,0.0961971,0.012040772,0.08816042,0.013836153,0.00032901944,0.0009551004,0.00086094113,0.6810957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923928,0.0022634685,0.0003062781,0.00060622767,0.0033293369,0.0011018396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954625,0.0012979271,0.0003042445,0.0005837578,0.0014224128,0.0009292286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009373443,0.0010286787,0.00064552925,0.004403371,0.006700057,0.019101044,0.0019141111,0.010443987,0.015042713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013699165,0.0004698038,0.00073926366,0.007160405,0.011727494,0.008244983,0.0066678887,0.008755104,0.0042154198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009242016,0.000018316076,0.0001610849,0.00006702464,0.0000039734255,0.00008128504,0.0011683181,0.00023274556,0.000041676994,0.6404302,0.32725483,0.030531257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013183358,0.0000017849112,0.000157773,0.00016009991,8.246528e-7,0.000018524994,0.00028173672,0.000027257985,0.000015523638,0.02815489,0.9711738,0.0000062738163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059057795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04235372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059057795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023066195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03876328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16735774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341705180","doi":"","title":"The Oecd at Fifty: Some Observations on the Evolving Nature of an International Organization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Political science; Successor cardinal; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Position (finance); Marshall Plan; International community; Convention; Law; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.04292834697459877,"score_gpt":0.3014309652371726,"score_spread":0.2585026182625738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341705180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020333996,0.051845055,0.0029794679,0.08711849,0.0030557665,0.00006521169,0.0008498474,0.00017482686,0.83357733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70157105,0.117355235,0.011039097,0.041101348,0.00453912,0.00045534622,0.0018825564,0.0005493499,0.121506855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952095,0.0017657928,0.0002073328,0.0003007342,0.0017187485,0.0007978674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99434835,0.002687995,0.00055109937,0.0003401775,0.0014169711,0.0006554042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061523067,0.0004664713,0.0002766341,0.00625545,0.0047364924,0.01242234,0.00073045987,0.002123446,0.00774944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008027251,0.00023604263,0.00038980113,0.01570805,0.00935963,0.009896049,0.004608721,0.004378346,0.00135625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001833173,0.000018105702,0.0016217906,0.00010366959,0.0000038395247,0.00026157725,0.009474514,0.00012413057,0.00006859699,0.89095795,0.0661834,0.03116406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023471134,0.000008325907,0.0047129076,0.00034299938,0.0000021638402,0.00010335985,0.006783675,0.000053929165,0.000040487652,0.047030583,0.94090134,0.00001784348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017800855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014365366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017800855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008392778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049567292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06089419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824787426","doi":"","title":"The American Exclusion Rule Debate: Looking to England and Canada for Guidance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Law; Adversarial system; Confession (law); Magistrate; Political science; Adjudication; Suspect; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Search and seizure; Statute; Warrant; Supreme court; Constitution; Probable cause; Economic Justice; Business","score_opus":0.01913004110962151,"score_gpt":0.31507131750670125,"score_spread":0.29594127639707973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824787426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019750162,0.12996198,0.00054543075,0.6390071,0.012645324,0.000090414855,0.0006075225,0.00008211743,0.21508509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07633349,0.10451025,0.003411083,0.47629422,0.007857486,0.00025887846,0.00063613174,0.0003203803,0.33037803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222785,0.001213256,0.0002852215,0.00067150133,0.0030070127,0.002595235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936886,0.0029164993,0.0003918795,0.00039232898,0.005176118,0.0017543277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006796138,0.0011570383,0.001982213,0.0052695908,0.024561984,0.018709118,0.0064434214,0.025008716,0.03951007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015922852,0.00057734945,0.0012096178,0.008142038,0.016319677,0.011602797,0.00471105,0.01643002,0.004982305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025699563,0.00004382241,0.00041890494,0.00022022404,0.0000069673915,0.00022314342,0.0010044845,0.00014018826,0.000056383127,0.2379981,0.73978376,0.020078275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137937395,0.000004723234,0.0011307705,0.0008870108,0.000006634891,0.000036674155,0.001707533,0.000115729614,0.000034440294,0.015611377,0.98040384,0.000047584657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97603476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12500863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12500863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15889864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9070053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W925358830","doi":"","title":"Chapter 20 Dispute Resolution under Nafta: Fact or Fiction?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Arbitration; Context (archaeology); Scrutiny; Political science; Free trade; Dispute mechanism; Alternative dispute resolution; Free trade agreement; International arbitration; Dispute board; International trade; International trade law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.03013144900501238,"score_gpt":0.26470549232761914,"score_spread":0.23457404332260676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W925358830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01592282,0.08038033,0.006948976,0.22853895,0.013027485,0.00021638614,0.0003010815,0.00010815557,0.6545558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4592137,0.08175919,0.009900543,0.097370826,0.015981775,0.00066811877,0.0009584974,0.00015756577,0.33398983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905385,0.0035469327,0.00068124424,0.0006761349,0.003868999,0.0006881248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871831,0.008493809,0.0012475682,0.00037749464,0.0024849048,0.00021308736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010088691,0.00036500877,0.00036964336,0.0013453695,0.005604437,0.010015967,0.0019007247,0.0062127165,0.00996833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026924869,0.0002702209,0.0003696453,0.002516171,0.008256137,0.00479883,0.0019277263,0.0048349774,0.0017054204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017702685,0.000032252716,0.000738322,0.00025096448,0.0000063391785,0.00035919735,0.011723944,0.00023350603,0.00029948863,0.8141862,0.13689011,0.03526195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027420958,0.000015580805,0.0005424563,0.0007180069,0.0000050747117,0.00013970466,0.0026795568,0.00011742052,0.00020433126,0.032783974,0.9627767,0.000014540382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022382023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021590414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022382023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069062444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010235479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05335474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}