{"meta":{"query_hash":"68ba60c9d7b9","filters":{"venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68ba60c9d7b9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%C2%98The+%C2%9CJournal+of+Philosophical+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W2554209335","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10693","title":"Aristotle on justice in exchange: commensurability by fiat","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Historical Economic and Legal Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commensurability (mathematics); Stipulation; Currency; Philosophy; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Action (physics); Economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Neoclassical economics; Physics","score_opus":0.03516583253736748,"score_gpt":0.2851392804907014,"score_spread":0.24997344795333393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554209335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48810554,0.00062889484,0.000394457,0.38934946,0.0028938134,0.00034167015,0.000085820306,0.000027037137,0.11817331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952596,0.0006480967,0.000035671954,0.0023853094,0.0011494497,0.0000021563474,4.0581475e-7,0.000012516478,0.0005068391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984502,0.00036931018,0.0006125602,0.00015663955,0.00012325111,0.00028803755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976889,0.001458315,0.00035336148,0.0002170978,0.000052427346,0.00022992898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024053836,0.000123093,0.00032284134,0.00006258398,0.00023013195,0.000024409681,0.0005435168,0.00014315164,0.00027342743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033513558,0.000077532364,0.00012620435,0.00009192273,0.00036454227,0.00020959512,0.000043083823,0.00042247746,0.00011370786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028597193,0.002266547,0.0034723212,0.000082265964,0.00020407797,0.00006149145,0.012995055,0.00058981735,0.00038692323,0.6453993,0.12580611,0.20587638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083717384,0.00019091896,0.00031373772,0.000022671202,0.000028351236,0.0000051457223,0.00015168915,0.00004548778,0.000014320175,0.22535431,0.7728687,0.00016749304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016275396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007722922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6470626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011115237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019140863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3161678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795745614","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10709","title":"Crises, confidence, and animal spirits: exploring subjectivity in the dualism of Descartes and Keynes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal spirits; Rationality; Subjectivity; Soul; Subject (documents); Dualism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Passions; Irrationality; Realm; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09984827522575836,"score_gpt":0.25258127757543763,"score_spread":0.1527330023496793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795745614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901223,0.0013284688,0.00014067987,0.004314642,0.0002919242,0.000110109875,0.000043821947,0.000003457342,0.0036445688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977093,0.0012781187,0.00009557807,0.00041454306,0.00048234093,0.00000421496,4.8615266e-7,0.0000102169915,0.000005252609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998653,0.00006577453,0.00089880207,0.0001814877,0.000020903706,0.0001800244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985982,0.00047122003,0.00058723,0.00022778398,0.00004635715,0.000069195215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021582516,0.0001375805,0.000442014,0.00017106732,0.00016371802,0.00006252522,0.00032732825,0.00008356781,0.00003408802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014398627,0.00010875144,0.000081492275,0.0000982862,0.00072984083,0.0006051908,0.00008059245,0.00029383204,0.000009999832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011936419,0.000060751645,0.011727989,0.000014376574,0.000039985793,0.0000024388798,0.001241521,0.000031688884,0.00004507231,0.9864192,0.000022030828,0.00027556997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007232219,0.0004494452,0.032004558,0.00003446711,0.000021811522,0.00021223804,0.0006330289,0.000773247,0.00019862103,0.96187085,0.0029087944,0.00016973751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008357594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017153288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024548382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003691915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4434755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939070806","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10714","title":"Financial bubbles and their magic: asset price as a heroic journey in the financial markets","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mythology; Financial market; MAGIC (telescope); Asset (computer security); Universality (dynamical systems); Financial economics; Neoclassical economics; Finance; Positive economics; History","score_opus":0.028677151855519833,"score_gpt":0.2219433484856999,"score_spread":0.19326619663018008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939070806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96519214,0.0023179895,0.0005153095,0.016332686,0.0005187121,0.00021978127,0.000064474065,0.000006391085,0.014832526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954903,0.00065924035,0.00007174269,0.0017812497,0.0018515202,0.000003960535,0.0000020646685,0.000023094126,0.00011684412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777275,0.000121985504,0.0013930786,0.0002822186,0.000057667854,0.0003722764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797106,0.00032891615,0.0010692937,0.00041625727,0.00010218424,0.000112318616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030369398,0.00025982666,0.0007539348,0.00027453466,0.00025939854,0.00019292808,0.0008093756,0.00016933827,0.0003928925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026420047,0.00017559552,0.0002818415,0.00032474365,0.00027630114,0.00029969646,0.00014524478,0.00056237355,0.00012837468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007917683,0.00038096376,0.00919624,0.000053059794,0.00027319655,0.000047146023,0.0038610639,0.00023110856,0.000021895266,0.97789824,0.0028250683,0.0044202674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009850208,0.00043398506,0.02332033,0.000027443268,0.000024404264,0.0004538083,0.000261916,0.0041525266,0.0000055329174,0.879081,0.090970196,0.00028383243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001519899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006900541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09881722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011494623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011271955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7160577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973100564","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10723","title":"On Amartya Sen's concept of sympathy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Altruism (biology); Epistemology; Section (typography); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016709442703894548,"score_gpt":0.2584302133620308,"score_spread":0.24172077065813627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973100564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707208,0.000051767107,0.000032444637,0.021953609,0.0008406573,0.00014967051,0.00001659636,0.000007721389,0.10622671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996227,0.00006905843,0.000035519734,0.0026067735,0.0007946738,6.732522e-7,5.964237e-7,0.000010413295,0.00025526862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986918,0.000182193,0.000582752,0.00011406037,0.0001404678,0.00028870543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998007,0.0009887922,0.00044548282,0.00021897526,0.0001015404,0.00023822923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011423272,0.000112668386,0.00037443373,0.00006865251,0.00011203134,0.000026197553,0.00052899384,0.00015333894,0.0005186547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013130272,0.00008590285,0.00021760266,0.00006257139,0.00046076818,0.00019673508,0.000051276933,0.000372881,0.0001447523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106674604,0.000073511,0.00012390921,0.000004955612,0.00004319697,0.0000021738606,0.0007835713,0.00046414448,0.000013613577,0.9971605,0.00018505787,0.0010386683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080455054,0.0004610086,0.00023807494,0.00002832586,0.000036642574,0.000011735701,0.0005902097,0.00025948242,0.00020793096,0.9625621,0.034643687,0.00015625273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007185565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004373344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1255062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013170358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029309382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5678905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178742903","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10741","title":"Rejoinder on animal spirits in Descartes and Keynes: a response to Kurt Smith","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Rationality; Philosophy; Dualism; Order (exchange); Animal spirits; Subjectivity; Relation (database); Reading (process); Physicalism; Sociology; Metaphysics; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05352577066229615,"score_gpt":0.23281063112970798,"score_spread":0.17928486046741182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178742903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197265,0.00040035456,0.00019987569,0.075734586,0.00018840477,0.0001680767,0.000063144835,0.000008819255,0.0035102519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184996,0.00017032497,0.00024241113,0.0072435862,0.00043972742,0.000004111216,6.3388086e-7,0.000023444352,0.000025779787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982566,0.00007567953,0.0010948838,0.0002949618,0.000022816885,0.00025504202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986435,0.0003599092,0.00043328022,0.0002298735,0.000027928252,0.00030547468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015914529,0.00019111397,0.0005466182,0.00024228312,0.00011231056,0.00007082604,0.00039414785,0.0001266171,0.000085102874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032359478,0.00018037502,0.00013179077,0.00015876877,0.00014028889,0.00030047918,0.000097081574,0.00047501098,0.0002610432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063899895,0.0001909181,0.0076871165,0.00002367411,0.00010922664,0.000034597193,0.002038904,0.0076684277,0.00019471253,0.9747525,0.00044783176,0.00046214362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049115834,0.004541235,0.050333627,0.00012245686,0.000039451777,0.0002663175,0.000566788,0.009107611,0.00022551171,0.84981906,0.07910823,0.00095812895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008021592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017809194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1249334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015356214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008326247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.735548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298240765","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10564","title":"Classifying Heterodoxy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heterodoxy; Heterodox economics; Scholarship; Positive economics; Discipline; Economics; Epistemology; Mainstream economics; Neoclassical economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Orthodoxy; Applied economics; Social science","score_opus":0.0777712372618511,"score_gpt":0.22878963543066,"score_spread":0.1510183981688089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298240765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430635,0.0010740279,0.0027371945,0.007482708,0.001500704,0.000116798015,0.000061285624,0.00001998,0.043943796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959147,0.00097087433,0.00033200585,0.0014847876,0.0010496583,0.0000024519481,0.000002248961,0.000026209096,0.00021704612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980349,0.00004043268,0.001405407,0.00020943183,0.000023614057,0.00028620413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816877,0.00018881784,0.0010173483,0.00040167532,0.000047374797,0.0001760147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011567497,0.0001865126,0.00055460684,0.00020391334,0.00037579366,0.000037236085,0.0006616632,0.00014763576,0.00032836956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000752692,0.00016941637,0.00033446308,0.000101000085,0.00036790175,0.0005148952,0.000086112836,0.0005283617,0.00065979577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008564296,0.00010784241,0.0034145438,0.000006833408,0.00012649318,0.000015607673,0.00030579008,0.0029369728,0.000021889029,0.9923309,0.0004497133,0.00019778528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010249325,0.00020218096,0.0026856177,0.0000123121035,0.000018995454,0.0011364969,0.000051293307,0.0023303162,0.0000557514,0.91288936,0.07927742,0.00031533538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012319386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011421196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07944154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001857201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007708767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.848056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317937833","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10890","title":"THE FUTURE OF POST-KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS: Post-Keynesian Economics at 50","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Post-Keynesian economics; Keynesian economics; New Keynesian economics; Schools of economic thought; Institution; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social science; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.016746223271417605,"score_gpt":0.2555084441207358,"score_spread":0.2387622208493182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317937833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7889467,0.00041646106,0.00000871971,0.19072929,0.0023707522,0.00032783175,0.00014774899,0.000038965623,0.017013574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983566,0.0070434315,0.00007345331,0.0036963944,0.0048980503,0.00000872977,0.000013052104,0.00005750284,0.00064342143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965685,0.0003570234,0.0016369262,0.00034708067,0.00013663479,0.00095385604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954995,0.0016751732,0.0012349959,0.0006460338,0.00028401805,0.0006603087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033613886,0.00035711622,0.00077179715,0.00020602635,0.001254751,0.00018286028,0.0018774092,0.00044838534,0.00020299578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019445438,0.00026738585,0.00066486065,0.00017665156,0.0013050186,0.0005766783,0.00035829513,0.000683766,0.00029271154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046743467,0.00008020583,0.00034933907,0.000019453402,0.00025259214,0.000008735659,0.0016526514,0.0008516291,0.000025806512,0.9833628,0.0006280451,0.012301317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095081836,0.00033985917,0.0024686486,0.000018892799,0.00011911207,0.000080862694,0.0042736167,0.0007345973,0.00006366491,0.56825054,0.42225263,0.00044673966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030418765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006294596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4216246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006760686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010184859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W643978122","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10610","title":"The capacity to choose: reformulating the concept of choice in economic theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Realism; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Possession (linguistics); Rational choice theory (criminology); Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06423312031436564,"score_gpt":0.23780381399514205,"score_spread":0.17357069368077643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W643978122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96743965,0.00068391004,0.00045936264,0.0047652316,0.0010874752,0.00030229948,0.00009822055,0.0000073987503,0.025156474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820757,0.00016233399,0.00015842152,0.0008293544,0.0005305803,0.000009125636,7.8547254e-7,0.000024416247,0.0000773964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972574,0.00014072302,0.0019861548,0.00023116008,0.000026130518,0.00035844542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966463,0.0010315728,0.0014734758,0.0006677013,0.00004619476,0.00013479721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004640276,0.00021413168,0.00057299115,0.00016253973,0.00035969922,0.000050058716,0.0013822786,0.00013750633,0.00019387552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028702832,0.0001387996,0.00028434212,0.00012026641,0.00057758857,0.00039835673,0.00016848465,0.0006434467,0.00014638196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015174692,0.000050887833,0.0022935295,0.0000036104207,0.00009467519,6.440426e-7,0.0017921748,0.004632573,0.0000060665047,0.9901446,0.00003664659,0.0007928285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066753454,0.0001570359,0.010390902,0.000019997733,0.000018907916,0.000040461804,0.00035658557,0.0012585353,0.00017842778,0.9764274,0.0102778785,0.00020637916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030888585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005988494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030767959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034568083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090902126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5660083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}