{"meta":{"query_hash":"8030753962ec","filters":{"venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8030753962ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%C2%98The+%C2%9CLahore+journal+of+economics"},"results":[{"id":"W2095723048","doi":"10.35536/lje.2009.v14.isp.a9","title":"Pakistan-India Trade Potential and Issues","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Politics; South asia; Economics; International economics; Free trade; International free trade agreement; World trade; Development economics; Trade barrier; Business; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.016240531323354093,"score_gpt":0.2892266703291592,"score_spread":0.27298613900580515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095723048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116251945,0.016396513,0.00062005856,0.05426869,0.00038233885,0.000022011054,0.0009461403,0.00003630158,0.8110759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562058,0.009344508,0.00027670784,0.0026972215,0.00031509303,0.0000138200285,0.0002682036,0.000009709168,0.030868972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999315,0.00013576755,0.000036244008,0.00008212343,0.00019946472,0.0002315034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988789,0.0005049846,0.0001546831,0.00004794295,0.0002039964,0.00020954544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007199672,0.00017231243,0.00011909057,0.0017667658,0.00411212,0.008800292,0.0004874239,0.0012802845,0.025526986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012996817,0.00012269108,0.00017254063,0.004045498,0.0019958245,0.0026886389,0.0015718567,0.0014653186,0.0016249717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009125318,0.000072820716,0.027227882,0.0004168866,0.000015201483,0.0037390334,0.007337408,0.00063495064,0.0005552864,0.81120956,0.049528666,0.099171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015761938,0.000080679456,0.05059404,0.0006980507,0.000022086424,0.006831871,0.040035672,0.00062429364,0.0007690339,0.12790179,0.7723867,0.000040017538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01160377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012082632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025526986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032002234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003284272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08539623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240565397","doi":"10.35536/lje.2013.v18.i1.a1","title":"One-Step-Ahead Forecastability of GARCH (1,1):A Comparative Analysis of USD- and PKR-Based ExchangeRate Volatilities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rupee; Liberian dollar; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Currency; Economics; Volatility (finance); Exchange rate; Us dollar; Context (archaeology); Robustness (evolution); Econometrics; U.S. Dollar Index; International economics; Monetary economics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.07533280719109103,"score_gpt":0.2517586558472207,"score_spread":0.17642584865612965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240565397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531105,0.0008595468,0.042331364,0.00022301316,0.00003810073,0.00002599047,0.0004751366,0.00032354533,0.0026127892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617296,0.00018394168,0.003007939,0.00001171206,0.000016404427,0.000004224121,0.0003840603,0.00002288736,0.00019589641],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910223,0.0003574143,0.0000594183,0.00014853675,0.0002520527,0.0000803764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98982483,0.007879876,0.00073132804,0.0008463824,0.00055893685,0.00015861762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00600809,0.00055662653,0.00059313944,0.0016471274,0.00025165567,0.0012952005,0.00054485636,0.00062564,0.0007134155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016935827,0.00023981852,0.0007835836,0.0009612724,0.00028862018,0.0021816222,0.00048823323,0.0007489235,0.00019195258],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011541268,0.00016419702,0.13298547,0.00020281928,0.0006805771,0.0004641172,0.0005211427,0.7319337,0.004659509,0.010347849,0.0010726793,0.11581377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017058697,0.00023833232,0.05902728,0.000023480263,0.000091164846,0.00014512871,0.00010463162,0.9355821,0.0013876681,0.0029523359,0.0003742499,0.000056589943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061010886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003768264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061010886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035856327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044832157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031774163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24503999","doi":"10.35536/lje.2013.v18.isp.a2","title":"Education in Pakistan’s Punjab: Outcomes and Interventions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic growth; Psychological intervention; Population; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Democracy; Developing country; Politics; Devolution (biology); Development economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.02061644845831706,"score_gpt":0.32293788737437895,"score_spread":0.3023214389160619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24503999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627088,0.015334406,0.00023723894,0.009362085,0.00032727767,0.0012712372,0.0012209401,0.000041975636,0.009496067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841357,0.010885879,0.0010601139,0.001407414,0.00009851571,0.0009125715,0.0004540866,0.000004258113,0.0010413906],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865097,0.00062081625,0.00006847523,0.00007131061,0.00015290675,0.00043564275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985268,0.0003983877,0.00032550204,0.0000326338,0.00013650583,0.00058009307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018921511,0.0003912458,0.0006799051,0.001125111,0.001625104,0.0011763675,0.0008096436,0.0010705644,0.004367785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034824247,0.00022089238,0.0006209695,0.0016235048,0.0008499447,0.00084274553,0.0020097462,0.0018853059,0.00021230982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007433394,0.07899297,0.17933625,0.011779354,0.0007543295,0.0015689628,0.004509536,0.003598741,0.0011621942,0.007282948,0.012634233,0.6909471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008855844,0.039116897,0.89128625,0.009132363,0.0014981302,0.0006379197,0.017238356,0.001982532,0.0016641986,0.0035779665,0.024888737,0.00012074773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0205014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028702267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0205014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035527032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00988671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040764153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613249879","doi":"10.35536/lje.2002.v7.i1.a3","title":"Using Theatre as a Research Tool: Troubleshooting andBenchmarking Pakistan's Devolution Plan","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada","keywords":"Grassroots; Devolution (biology); Benchmarking; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political science; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Sociology; Management; Economics; Law; Politics; Economy","score_opus":0.19392348259423514,"score_gpt":0.37651313203040787,"score_spread":0.18258964943617273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613249879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.863175,0.0011469371,0.029659415,0.006474228,0.0005703056,0.0049099294,0.0016961443,0.00015653003,0.092211656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568365,0.001593929,0.026927982,0.00055753114,0.00013878194,0.002342819,0.0006286356,0.00005741601,0.010916343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867758,0.009931546,0.0004943333,0.00034704967,0.0013956196,0.001055677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97902346,0.014465453,0.0012932152,0.0012320835,0.0030854584,0.0009003394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012798113,0.00060689944,0.0004600618,0.006022982,0.005319143,0.0054350123,0.0015024092,0.0010946858,0.0076720146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023806842,0.00039938078,0.0002733696,0.005834739,0.0041978126,0.004207599,0.0037802085,0.001757591,0.00082717655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043556446,0.0010802861,0.02367589,0.0016766374,0.000022254359,0.0019185463,0.4782575,0.001999174,0.004432205,0.027744668,0.019720746,0.4390365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004754118,0.0006254426,0.013615965,0.0005265082,0.00002382466,0.00025746637,0.9050886,0.0016294995,0.0038072376,0.0043805493,0.06993666,0.000060836024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008833834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015780548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012798113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065098093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070158574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0676837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959638240","doi":"10.35536/lje.2002.v7.i1.a4","title":"“Commenting on the Causal Factors ControllingFemale Decision Making”A study of Female Decision Making RegardingPaid Employment: Punjab, Pakistan","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Making-of; Politics; Demographic economics; Policy making; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Public administration; Law; Management","score_opus":0.09057050698424453,"score_gpt":0.3535816152006186,"score_spread":0.2630111082163741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959638240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.868711,0.0014178664,0.00060529565,0.11741121,0.00064867747,0.000043865617,0.00035950533,0.0000062252548,0.010796424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98871803,0.00062911946,0.00018285369,0.0066826385,0.0002130486,0.00003371635,0.00006357385,0.0000054496186,0.003471509],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682885,0.0020966763,0.00006948812,0.00032031367,0.00024310566,0.0004414843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98438394,0.012172419,0.0014999142,0.00033663688,0.0008802589,0.0007267731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008958997,0.0005352611,0.00024938703,0.00067295606,0.0073166145,0.0031785802,0.0012954831,0.0021137965,0.007897527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017652342,0.0004458423,0.00041847263,0.0012011674,0.006703892,0.002653067,0.0016132094,0.0032955848,0.0004907004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023808163,0.0002059138,0.32034618,0.00019747714,0.000054823096,0.0021063006,0.5928447,0.00017166047,0.00039302395,0.024871193,0.037968297,0.020602314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004106648,0.00011038446,0.23177506,0.00027924578,0.000059813974,0.00035033785,0.7219652,0.00033218024,0.00059574563,0.003554484,0.040879805,0.000056801542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098438464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091943346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098438464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025152508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004652912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19573098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959734262","doi":"10.35536/lje.2002.v7.i2.a3","title":"Private Schooling - A Quality Puzzle","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy rate; Quarter (Canadian coin); Private education; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Private sector; Demographic economics; Quality (philosophy); Primary education; Private school; China; Economics; Business; Literacy; Political science; Socioeconomics; Higher education; Geography","score_opus":0.08000326697940903,"score_gpt":0.3284568457522151,"score_spread":0.2484535787728061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959734262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5012505,0.027171778,0.0048058056,0.32968068,0.0006135515,0.00011773068,0.009698533,0.00012384329,0.12653758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602873,0.004238644,0.00033291543,0.0039564013,0.0005091596,0.000020511368,0.00064872106,0.00003189245,0.004233005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963683,0.00095246406,0.00020827618,0.00048225367,0.0012837282,0.0007049333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706771,0.012762301,0.006640053,0.0020700525,0.003954519,0.0038959961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053906543,0.00019416242,0.0009977795,0.0026240728,0.0017433986,0.005832242,0.00087707624,0.0011852984,0.020131018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022725996,0.00036687378,0.00044672377,0.005147539,0.0032513523,0.005121216,0.0031946383,0.0018475023,0.0010192936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039473097,0.00055108336,0.33954138,0.00078370055,0.00029945016,0.0004112746,0.005921219,0.002355706,0.00023372778,0.40899885,0.058385175,0.18212368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000297011,0.00020087475,0.6049328,0.0013843118,0.00015196827,0.00038231973,0.011080781,0.0026496903,0.00029166043,0.26001647,0.11854056,0.000071676506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033661284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030758739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033661284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005112609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032958917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06734496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960658690","doi":"10.35536/lje.2002.v7.i2.a6","title":"An Analysis of Male Internal Migration and Its Correlation toEmployment Status: Evidence from the Punjab","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Internal migration; Poverty; Population; Urbanization; Population growth; Development economics; Immigration; Developing country; Geography; Human migration; Rural area; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Economics; Socioeconomics; Political science; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03653255918942098,"score_gpt":0.2840285412610338,"score_spread":0.2474959820716128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960658690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99799025,0.00032075352,0.00005292123,0.00015961195,0.000012825419,0.0000071316153,0.0002726268,0.0000021842598,0.0011817245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988464,0.0003565674,0.0000552407,0.00004862902,0.000013986418,0.0000085385955,0.00029218735,0.0000026379287,0.00037578205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989504,0.000412921,0.000062986415,0.00010190356,0.00016801119,0.00030371474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437594,0.0016367364,0.002098926,0.0003589701,0.00063173316,0.00089768117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012922562,0.00034519413,0.00034112346,0.0020781443,0.0013710193,0.0011873789,0.0009344777,0.0004897037,0.004614813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047809863,0.00037348253,0.0004724969,0.004363828,0.0012078908,0.0005670262,0.0013528262,0.00095799746,0.0006419326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038309376,0.00007431929,0.99551183,0.000020849273,0.00004125724,0.00007554849,0.0011037563,0.000026707501,0.000024385896,0.000117227464,0.00021290529,0.0027528382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022604722,0.00004733289,0.9974477,0.000022026265,0.000015199289,0.00006291327,0.0019667402,0.000056510245,0.000014957854,0.00002860958,0.00033261348,0.0000031679745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03171655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046271767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03171655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005337567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085607974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06306386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962176516","doi":"10.35536/lje.2005.v10.i1.a2","title":"Child Labor’s Link with Literacy and Poverty in Pakistan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œLahore journal of economics","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Per capita income; Literacy; Economics; Welfare; Developing country; Educational attainment; Per capita; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Population; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.007605250693504781,"score_gpt":0.26779745410753636,"score_spread":0.2601922034140316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962176516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986552,0.00013128636,0.000026057807,0.00014668153,0.0000020490543,0.000002812384,0.000054130534,7.405911e-7,0.0009809732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997757,0.000091647315,0.000017309621,0.000011049637,0.0000030334618,0.0000013360102,0.000025033343,2.1591451e-7,0.00007473441],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962556,0.00011534644,0.000028698529,0.000033412758,0.000063926374,0.0001331112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977774,0.0006598239,0.0010258841,0.000045926405,0.00014725784,0.0003437117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004742287,0.000111552625,0.0001440023,0.0011581414,0.0006021569,0.00077591836,0.00017830769,0.00025292838,0.002404932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022635348,0.00014537423,0.00021083461,0.0011271508,0.0007958054,0.00039994196,0.00071925326,0.0004352512,0.00014729869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002000156,0.000026671225,0.9978927,0.0000054072575,0.000007339212,0.00010897245,0.00024278324,0.00003566048,0.000023405097,0.00010810266,0.000057692483,0.0014712354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023756916,0.00005248439,0.9977881,0.000014475595,0.000007974819,0.00020756414,0.0013707349,0.00017092709,0.00003247843,0.0001128511,0.00023715694,0.0000028586376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02371684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022003643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02371684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050495216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084615924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047157586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}