{"meta":{"query_hash":"1e68b91c1fd1","filters":{"venue":"˜The œSpringer series on demographic methods and population analysis"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1e68b91c1fd1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%C2%98The+%C2%9CSpringer+series+on+demographic+methods+and+population+analysis"},"results":[{"id":"W118871652","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-6752-5_12","title":"Living Arrangements and Psychological Disposition of the Oldest Old Population in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œSpringer series on demographic methods and population analysis","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; China; Population; Psychology; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Social psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02557723809216178,"score_gpt":0.3312550162885132,"score_spread":0.30567777819635145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118871652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99870765,0.00042226215,0.0000315928,0.00007520702,0.000007752137,0.0000027807669,0.000117083764,0.0000011351243,0.00063458196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863213,0.00042900414,0.000050729006,0.00001925981,0.000012302345,0.00000404092,0.0001371224,9.2066387e-7,0.0007145308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998927,0.000023149512,0.00001212637,0.000024552543,0.000018484056,0.000028959666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997117,0.000032199372,0.000088823035,0.000018449786,0.00003934648,0.00010953745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030392956,0.0001812293,0.00014360124,0.0011286798,0.00064199464,0.00042805847,0.00024152371,0.00017906775,0.0011519196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006785192,0.00015410277,0.00018928971,0.0014395769,0.00039362267,0.00046836984,0.00038190762,0.00032573848,0.00010893441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002627775,0.000033450702,0.98745406,0.000012207569,0.000030353229,0.00011657118,0.0032770473,0.00008193575,0.00023713577,0.0003411648,0.0002800785,0.008109703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.362078e-7,0.00001552462,0.99852246,0.0000036994984,0.0000055261903,0.000035419074,0.0010335647,0.00007765035,0.000012105757,0.00010154158,0.00018901101,0.0000029004207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047370013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09755641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047370013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005702162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050876767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09418857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516021269","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-32283-4_17","title":"Exploring Contingent Inequalities: Building the Theoretical Health Inequality Model","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œSpringer series on demographic methods and population analysis","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.16335991178850096,"score_gpt":0.41728966368195686,"score_spread":0.2539297518934559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516021269","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028700523,0.0029918372,0.80154425,0.03729002,0.0003489168,0.00008632821,0.00058284303,0.00009660744,0.12835857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82948756,0.006303923,0.148538,0.002643851,0.00077687355,0.000594034,0.00049868686,0.00012862554,0.0110283345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867874,0.00083983556,0.000034721394,0.00013734831,0.00017330673,0.0001359959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687225,0.0024669254,0.00012640304,0.00022642605,0.00015352054,0.00015446778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024404353,0.00067018636,0.0008168116,0.001731679,0.0017521357,0.0032005354,0.0019410593,0.0018522721,0.00980558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00730563,0.0004594627,0.0010730369,0.002343751,0.0054266676,0.0067934636,0.0042045573,0.00453425,0.00059009733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001912903,0.000012248074,0.00022273387,0.000012270112,0.0000039125066,0.00001125314,0.0001271115,0.002591029,0.000016886714,0.99374616,0.0006467458,0.0026077805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011537314,0.0000021992498,0.000078540914,0.00001252326,0.0000017619336,0.000007315057,0.00007331207,0.009589549,0.000008464204,0.98892397,0.0012991332,0.0000019480483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044997507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00980558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022594621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019470942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03280294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089518909","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-42472-5_3","title":"Using Expert Elicitation to Build Long-Term Projection Assumptions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œSpringer series on demographic methods and population analysis","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"Expert elicitation; Probabilistic logic; Randomness; Projection (relational algebra); Computer science; Term (time); Protocol (science); Population; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Management science; Statistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.08768141678458508,"score_gpt":0.4119517408774807,"score_spread":0.32427032409289563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089518909","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026099024,0.00025778834,0.9155762,0.00379749,0.00012090642,0.0020315393,0.0022095148,0.0005089896,0.04939855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30852786,0.00048393948,0.6786236,0.00093880796,0.0000737744,0.0038085305,0.0032476205,0.00019856708,0.0040973234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9138486,0.066588625,0.004265467,0.0033613846,0.010883925,0.0010520474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6635058,0.2707825,0.008034405,0.023277096,0.032956645,0.0014435403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08587313,0.0012217631,0.00067546905,0.0027251886,0.002042408,0.0055647716,0.0035454673,0.0022249995,0.015103496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21801789,0.0009746978,0.0010004896,0.0024580879,0.0032339657,0.0075044874,0.008796815,0.0043709874,0.002572665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068599737,0.00047538933,0.007073941,0.0023756186,0.00025709195,0.001059596,0.03294061,0.14014272,0.005550817,0.4411491,0.045409795,0.32287925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011552016,0.00019661177,0.0030758965,0.00292417,0.00008623888,0.00020554259,0.009135993,0.25354898,0.007556508,0.6340231,0.08888651,0.0002450807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059987656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074011325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08587313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006482592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007617431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4541459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}