{"meta":{"query_hash":"6d0cf2dcf3a2","filters":{"venue":"月刊税務事例"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6d0cf2dcf3a2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%E6%9C%88%E5%88%8A%E7%A8%8E%E5%8B%99%E4%BA%8B%E4%BE%8B"},"results":[{"id":"W216271840","doi":"","title":"欧米諸国における主要租税判例の紹介(第82回)カナダにおける包括的租税回避否認規定と同規定創設後における租税回避事例--Canada Trustco対Canada事案[2005 SCC 54]","year":2009,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"月刊税務事例","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.021518585469908817,"score_gpt":0.17564480996554488,"score_spread":0.15412622449563607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W216271840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051511027,0.009751158,0.013751769,0.023925418,0.00095184124,0.00011879765,0.0006186833,0.00010270438,0.8992686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6541893,0.0073513757,0.017679984,0.0073176436,0.0005104428,0.0000915521,0.00055605225,0.00010623978,0.31219736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987546,0.00013500187,0.000059185924,0.00020562843,0.0006509617,0.00019470848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736744,0.0005818646,0.00018432249,0.00016375886,0.0015560675,0.00014656057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017220057,0.00035872875,0.0003122697,0.0014287648,0.0050210166,0.003421769,0.0006821982,0.0016890022,0.012669052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044949814,0.00035213365,0.00042088545,0.0016808265,0.009562722,0.0026369584,0.0008441512,0.0025071036,0.002678214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058926114,0.000045129407,0.004768318,0.00013101363,0.000030079871,0.0006208925,0.007508893,0.0004011183,0.0011699746,0.86568314,0.060282998,0.059299514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024567029,0.000033541764,0.03130061,0.00030741942,0.00008434329,0.000925239,0.0060046446,0.000647226,0.005302745,0.3448318,0.6104314,0.000106413485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36011833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38079646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6398817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009380978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012217192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7160444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211998322","doi":"","title":"海外重要租税判例 親会社による債務保証料の徴収金額が独立企業間価格として適正であるとされた事例 : G.E Capital Canada Inc. v. The Queen(2009 TCC 563 2010 FCA 344)","year":2020,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"月刊税務事例","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Business","score_opus":0.012397331771983468,"score_gpt":0.18818381463453757,"score_spread":0.1757864828625541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211998322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017965639,0.0028395762,0.0045424444,0.027619474,0.0008627858,0.000101519516,0.00045562626,0.00010817976,0.9455047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62327963,0.0033271704,0.007573952,0.041503463,0.00088699366,0.00017184993,0.00032660892,0.0001010987,0.32282925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598,0.00043682873,0.00022795075,0.0006456135,0.0020014818,0.000708076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997148,0.0009312055,0.0002396977,0.00022211691,0.0012924712,0.00016665258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037529347,0.00044085248,0.00028084219,0.0009706634,0.0055725956,0.007941446,0.0012089256,0.0056817457,0.011822326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006189581,0.0005018746,0.00047003897,0.0006780605,0.0077750864,0.0032032828,0.0015657217,0.0060787178,0.0044182986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054479926,0.000033201974,0.0015281001,0.000113418755,0.000019177272,0.00039563864,0.0040575876,0.0001372651,0.0018596826,0.88715684,0.08444913,0.020195445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041735395,0.00007915094,0.0066534285,0.00032870506,0.00008421869,0.0005887102,0.0033258572,0.00048230359,0.008471999,0.17343988,0.8063774,0.0001266657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10554546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1763217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89445454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006876274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009750325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20986223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W360894783","doi":"","title":"欧米諸国における主要租税判例の紹介(第91回)カナダにおける包括的租税回避否認規定の適用--Lipson対Canada事案[2009 SCC 1]","year":2010,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"月刊税務事例","topic":"Military Technology and Strategies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.005603003923065911,"score_gpt":0.192660512098563,"score_spread":0.1870575081754971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W360894783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07421092,0.0046560103,0.005817139,0.008033614,0.00092129724,0.0001162817,0.0003402194,0.00008819644,0.9058164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5594381,0.005546307,0.009540233,0.0024328358,0.00032309047,0.000075420096,0.0005250747,0.000069421956,0.4220495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928707,0.00006414555,0.000028429959,0.00011248343,0.00040794685,0.000099824676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881315,0.00021950984,0.00010068474,0.00007526418,0.0006972549,0.00009407844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007598433,0.00029830093,0.00016385937,0.00079565373,0.0030639048,0.002575351,0.000427135,0.0011087396,0.019186184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00195672,0.0002211868,0.000233766,0.00083616324,0.0032867095,0.0011015051,0.00057482533,0.001152488,0.0047657886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002236972,0.00014702076,0.009296191,0.0002979838,0.00003894035,0.0013819089,0.011277147,0.00062989775,0.014232387,0.60854995,0.11531101,0.23861386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022066752,0.00008977997,0.018103203,0.00018196342,0.000049879236,0.001159209,0.0050593982,0.00035118483,0.017052598,0.043649662,0.9142144,0.000066618355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11696985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14942634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8830302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043089744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062836995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23257804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W579123392","doi":"","title":"欧米諸国における主要租税判例の紹介(第93回)包括的租税回避否認規定の適用が認められた事例--Mathew(Kaulius)対Canada事案[]","year":2010,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"月刊税務事例","topic":"Military Technology and Strategies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.005285511910626518,"score_gpt":0.19070530954794707,"score_spread":0.18541979763732055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W579123392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10122739,0.0050759325,0.01226673,0.009039332,0.0012034982,0.0001301182,0.0002524568,0.00014225896,0.87066233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7043043,0.0044920035,0.012350984,0.0021200576,0.0004454749,0.00008910425,0.00024571927,0.00005645249,0.2758959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943453,0.0000612301,0.000026682823,0.00008180118,0.0003193953,0.000076268545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912506,0.00018567855,0.00007323332,0.000054914854,0.0004807311,0.000080387355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076733663,0.00030025028,0.00015230116,0.0008040396,0.0025359266,0.0023533863,0.00038024035,0.0009321883,0.012942937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001776614,0.00020013652,0.00022465101,0.000633123,0.0036783323,0.0011770575,0.0005297703,0.0011122115,0.0032706142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001554604,0.000103304956,0.0049269632,0.00021169973,0.00004321935,0.00097265566,0.008015901,0.00071938033,0.013345032,0.7453989,0.04292821,0.18317923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032407163,0.00012833903,0.015238979,0.00019187642,0.00008029866,0.0014485241,0.0052154306,0.00089347217,0.027484763,0.1427924,0.80640405,0.000089531706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044743326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045812298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035395895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004199294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08896577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W604886128","doi":"","title":"海外重要租税判例 法の濫用か否かが問題となった事例(VAT) : Halifax and others V. Customs & Excise C-255/02 ECJ","year":2013,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"月刊税務事例","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Business; International trade; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012015253115979523,"score_gpt":0.21324543490430972,"score_spread":0.2012301817883302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W604886128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04441029,0.003280505,0.0011644535,0.07209481,0.0011127782,0.000116872616,0.0013082067,0.0001290276,0.87638307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5216108,0.0015816458,0.0014945609,0.04755849,0.00042218083,0.00014859009,0.00033731636,0.000058199756,0.4267882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981164,0.00026018813,0.00007840283,0.00023300435,0.00064551755,0.0006665219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983348,0.00065124925,0.00012926914,0.000103638056,0.000646013,0.00013504272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001550176,0.00044954036,0.0003090544,0.0012539547,0.009588767,0.009492709,0.0014355929,0.012332261,0.015053455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047789514,0.000552386,0.00047618285,0.0012711817,0.0040935245,0.0024225886,0.0016350003,0.0048089745,0.0023525713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010463144,0.000055335382,0.003417736,0.00008385217,0.000024511972,0.00071749405,0.003731292,0.0002516993,0.0009241419,0.65828073,0.3205575,0.011851209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008415397,0.00007483554,0.021055797,0.0003789373,0.000088283734,0.00068898965,0.0055462867,0.0006169917,0.0042821793,0.06333096,0.9036933,0.00015937956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31805143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49551305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31805143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012279583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009837753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63240033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}