{"meta":{"query_hash":"86c8ff24fceb","filters":{"venue":"法政理論"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/86c8ff24fceb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%E6%B3%95%E6%94%BF%E7%90%86%E8%AB%96"},"results":[{"id":"W253428692","doi":"","title":"The \"Dialogue Theory\" of Constitutional Review in Canada : Recent Challenges","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056688460603065795,"score_gpt":0.2855042642556903,"score_spread":0.22881580365262452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W253428692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030198132,0.40216964,0.000028193865,0.115374856,0.0008152389,0.0003692297,0.000023522547,0.00001259245,0.4781869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7352035,0.2642191,0.000006475258,0.00048409143,0.000056702454,0.000011540605,8.373947e-7,5.8862577e-7,0.000017173617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993003,0.00009304175,0.00014086423,0.00007147222,0.0002554649,0.00013887353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960536,0.00018930016,0.0000432672,0.000053074004,0.00007998934,0.000028981887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000598842,0.000041470365,0.00010265356,0.000007878972,0.0003379913,0.0000031240918,0.00012558444,0.000014867022,0.000045289715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045961997,0.000028165161,0.00002114884,0.00012409344,0.0010432199,0.000026867034,0.000021304078,0.000052816456,0.000006866272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032832488,0.000008773047,0.00022754112,0.000008198758,0.000007406731,0.0000025661043,0.000264168,0.000011017459,5.8194314e-7,0.9837344,0.00035151994,0.015380519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012738706,0.0000062973113,0.006027008,0.00035448116,0.000008136932,6.056552e-7,0.0027055624,4.4818343e-8,0.000009742496,0.27087316,0.71982235,0.00006523246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80673426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99224484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73218364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032061944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038693878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6864128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289529188","doi":"","title":"A comparative study of \"fair use\" in Japanese, Canadian and US Copyright Law (日加法政セミナー2008 著作権法をめぐる今日的課題--日本とカナダ)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Cultural and Historical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.08602671457109518,"score_gpt":0.242413550313543,"score_spread":0.15638683574244783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289529188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.875264,0.0004158538,1.3490812e-8,0.00031180476,0.00010665154,0.00022490912,0.000022857404,0.000015950869,0.12363799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99269086,0.000012142741,0.0000038462554,0.00029332362,0.000096734846,0.000008261385,0.000004374615,0.000003408256,0.006887036],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992906,0.000029800287,0.00019910489,0.00016637334,0.000115009214,0.00019913148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966836,0.00003671664,0.000043919248,0.00008483932,0.00007314632,0.00009302884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003746922,0.00012762636,0.00032084074,0.000065551045,0.00033274206,0.00006280987,0.000073423085,0.000024700292,0.00024746047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005720023,0.000089581255,0.000027917456,0.000055271183,0.00018216977,0.00016615016,0.00001661713,0.00009713979,0.000018449231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010102512,0.000964621,0.01029629,0.000023115452,0.00010711536,0.000076659715,0.7574596,0.000009706572,0.000049219994,0.19248465,0.038020726,0.0004072901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010278311,0.0009408577,0.12289874,0.000032964886,0.00003623631,0.0000029838243,0.03691083,0.000017737511,0.000012934174,0.0009068107,0.83689415,0.00031790347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58192503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7988734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082284314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013373996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42085895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32515944","doi":"","title":"Forensic DNA identification and Canadian criminal law (日加法政セミナー2007 現代刑事司法の諸問題--日本とカナダ)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Forensic and Genetic Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Identification (biology); Criminal law; Criminology; Political science; Criminal procedure; Law enforcement; Forensic identification; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.020502766576685313,"score_gpt":0.26684416157468693,"score_spread":0.24634139499800162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32515944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98492277,0.00088450604,0.00014847193,0.00035450247,0.00011379506,0.00013660287,0.000020959762,0.0000072727444,0.0134111475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303985,0.0002196316,0.0003092083,0.00048159633,0.00018992454,0.000010948488,0.00013261713,0.000015093701,0.0056011514],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991006,0.000027417313,0.00013694054,0.00029026353,0.00013740435,0.00030734576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935305,0.000005894795,0.000026714664,0.00029695933,0.000089907204,0.00022747011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012925704,0.00010278983,0.00008543395,0.000039615425,0.00021585514,0.00002363138,0.0001166285,0.0001150423,0.000043846438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037711307,0.00010032938,0.00003835441,0.000060751674,0.00031931087,0.0000035612406,0.000046421792,0.00006964898,0.0000562651],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019434758,0.00010605834,0.015671937,0.0001165521,0.00017377333,0.00019405564,0.000978591,0.00002836397,0.71298915,0.017336026,0.2010857,0.05112546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009531636,0.00044764086,0.116396286,0.000017178556,0.000041473573,0.0006992797,0.00032893618,0.00019631349,0.51201206,0.0011382899,0.36720106,0.0005683213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012040433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04181659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20097709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001676371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014997006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W402804713","doi":"","title":"Canadian treaty practice and the disabilities convention (日加法政セミナー2009報告)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Political science; Convention; Law","score_opus":0.012224251164023337,"score_gpt":0.32577196660869784,"score_spread":0.3135477154446745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W402804713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4210077,0.000040511997,0.0000057765137,0.10228132,0.0005713724,0.00033457775,0.0000056019962,0.000027460883,0.4757257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98776793,0.000032318967,0.00005150738,0.00024169395,0.00019663457,0.000013124781,0.0000030765868,0.0000026360226,0.011691068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993472,0.00019065652,0.000078809666,0.000105533036,0.00013989459,0.0001378759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916774,0.0005158951,0.000028532917,0.00012347664,0.000057695353,0.00010664023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008420165,0.00003986603,0.000055665078,0.00001526229,0.0006081552,0.00014252205,0.00007837333,0.00005191595,0.0005166797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011393318,0.000022672775,0.000029484485,0.00006579156,0.0013540662,0.00028211428,0.000008289741,0.00009470042,0.00003505067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017265014,0.000022078255,0.0059145154,0.0000029360592,0.000007555872,4.2190726e-7,0.024545165,2.5842112e-7,0.000011142223,0.96235126,0.0010769546,0.006050468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047701213,0.000010817913,0.009675501,0.0000026934983,0.00003228893,0.000002709528,0.04880624,0.00003361563,0.000018289042,0.090477124,0.85038084,0.000082850296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7416423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.910697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8718741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003998802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015063384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56572807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W560460769","doi":"","title":"Constitutional battles between parliament and the executive: the Canadian prorogation crisis (日加法政セミナー2010報告)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Constitutional crisis; Law; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.057089818003868364,"score_gpt":0.2828344671331767,"score_spread":0.22574464912930836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W560460769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044458143,0.0016519723,0.0002452133,0.0740468,0.0006329756,0.00092746655,0.0000776952,0.000054211134,0.87790555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871236,0.000113328104,0.00004427002,0.00068335223,0.00026129378,0.000047449834,0.000002813121,0.000001209288,0.0001339281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992291,0.00012575781,0.00010165297,0.000111058354,0.0002407876,0.00019169846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995785,0.00014373219,0.00004034113,0.00006546904,0.00008800407,0.000083968494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006151057,0.00006372893,0.0000859172,0.000015906298,0.002922248,0.000056084464,0.00014487593,0.000043384553,0.000121761754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012721843,0.00003485803,0.000033438828,0.00010471579,0.004959571,0.00008587984,0.00003261069,0.00008402579,0.000041571137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061184255,0.0000042979227,0.028744131,5.193375e-7,0.000031815744,7.629973e-7,0.008763133,1.823119e-7,1.6742463e-7,0.95833975,0.0028407464,0.0012683534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044475475,0.000016504659,0.23077348,0.000016833716,0.0000955254,0.0000016968503,0.020962927,0.000002013195,0.000023680994,0.23533003,0.5121682,0.00016434607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66866523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68018675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009446631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042789872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W593467991","doi":"","title":"The latest cases and statutes in corporate law in Canada and the United States (報告:日加法経セミナー2006 コーポレート・ガバナンスの今日的課題--日本とカナダ)","year":2007,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"法政理論","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015354657995956944,"score_gpt":0.19040661512611237,"score_spread":0.17505195713015542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W593467991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870069,0.0059203333,0.0000017398345,0.004197019,0.00036988917,0.0005301648,0.00005370383,0.000020760343,0.0018995114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920965,0.0035515646,0.000007512482,0.0032964242,0.00020448088,0.000013901939,0.00009494281,0.00003876331,0.0006959377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765414,0.00006616845,0.00068880164,0.0004242345,0.00036476925,0.0008018858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734724,0.0014140375,0.0006895515,0.0003474711,0.00015607824,0.00004563853],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015112631,0.0003927869,0.00041781474,0.00013666847,0.0005030396,0.0007372525,0.00030010063,0.00008899764,0.000038685066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012284862,0.00025456294,0.00003514053,0.0013181794,0.0006378169,0.00065459084,0.00029461322,0.00043680938,0.00001345292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014474881,0.0001162646,0.8701838,0.0004834733,0.00010374383,0.0024037422,0.00077143736,0.0006412706,0.000022190421,0.109757625,0.010140232,0.00392872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065216245,0.00004153355,0.6024807,0.0007650332,0.0001366211,0.000037121063,0.010731687,0.007361281,0.000044474767,0.011025078,0.3598839,0.0009709092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98859274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34974366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018484135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023743729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}