{"meta":{"query_hash":"e111c11d794a","filters":{"venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e111c11d794a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%AD%B8%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%89%80%E5%AD%B8%E4%BD%8D%E8%AB%96%E6%96%87"},"results":[{"id":"W2268075086","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2008.02503","title":"加拿大聯邦和魁北克主權運動(1976-2003)","year":2008,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Nationalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; National Question; Dual federalism; Political economy; Autonomy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02225598062423716,"score_gpt":0.2230455865796031,"score_spread":0.20078960595536594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268075086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023880944,0.009804669,0.000039982173,0.003189693,0.0066140178,0.00044018938,0.00013786998,0.0002137162,0.95567894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3201281,0.014956241,0.00024836234,0.002081748,0.0027649314,0.00002870359,0.000027359238,0.00007834769,0.6596862],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670094,0.00026483735,0.000476154,0.00061507203,0.00091881055,0.0010241707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803746,0.0000686622,0.00020825965,0.00056740455,0.000343858,0.00077434845],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047476927,0.0002850131,0.00044400952,0.00068593444,0.0043503786,0.00043961618,0.00071212347,0.00042830667,0.011484561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003897448,0.00041070514,0.00024872602,0.0020567854,0.0028284383,0.0005094678,0.00009686209,0.00050805014,0.0125859035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022555863,0.00021030275,0.001385361,0.000046109126,0.00007641695,0.000553475,0.040082727,0.000005014941,0.00004586112,0.100839905,0.8463964,0.010335886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003909091,0.000063866144,0.0062653334,0.00004007009,0.00005700735,0.000037936792,0.0015087371,0.000020614149,0.000006284132,0.00082488195,0.99027556,0.000508793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46637878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6708312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29624715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016293539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042621777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286784034","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2013.01537","title":"臺灣原住民族比例進用制度之政經分析，2001-2012","year":2013,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Government (linguistics); Promulgation; Procurement; Government procurement; Public administration; Business; Political science; Law; Economic growth; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.14090599298215395,"score_gpt":0.38221733438213046,"score_spread":0.2413113413999765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286784034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016232617,0.0022907155,0.000071971146,0.019573605,0.0028464496,0.0015041996,0.000042397747,0.00025162793,0.9571864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.577311,0.0014986551,0.00084710156,0.0011506394,0.0018974061,0.00013783343,0.000018787254,0.000072620336,0.41706595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936672,0.0007962427,0.0006627594,0.0009237328,0.0019307412,0.00201932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964662,0.000572983,0.00024398416,0.0010674986,0.0005893787,0.0010599479],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019290322,0.00047340593,0.00056647154,0.00028921332,0.001089985,0.0009981123,0.0019124146,0.00056959345,0.087122254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005827511,0.00048400194,0.00031925942,0.0011415317,0.0013046138,0.0023365482,0.0006973454,0.00092119764,0.06384511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018327164,0.00038544403,0.010644121,0.00007525304,0.00015785909,0.000072332834,0.0057626474,0.0000024223334,0.00023436667,0.33573654,0.59665686,0.050253842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007360549,0.00018039976,0.0056977635,0.00009469229,0.000043049084,0.0000042138154,0.0069066193,0.0002735202,0.00007923991,0.05271512,0.93248516,0.0007841842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011043839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082121755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56107837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003843802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011412174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301092872","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2009.01739","title":"現代社會與善之回復–Charles Taylor政治哲學之研究","year":2009,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Deliberation; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Liberalism; Contradiction; Modernity; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07827355567215796,"score_gpt":0.35761447538092805,"score_spread":0.27934091970877006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301092872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008414142,0.00302328,0.00013856642,0.094136246,0.0018430324,0.00036344887,0.0000802177,0.0003053209,0.89169574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97458476,0.0014779067,0.00024363921,0.012806844,0.0035442193,0.000006660877,0.000013551334,0.000029755744,0.007292662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995373,0.0004944685,0.0006241796,0.0007217866,0.001170111,0.0016164619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975648,0.00047513653,0.0001783581,0.00063197117,0.00021916672,0.0009305954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013122048,0.00045824226,0.00056151225,0.00014301698,0.0012704572,0.00031278934,0.0009414833,0.0008367728,0.0014517142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089726003,0.00046362265,0.000385276,0.0007407813,0.0012301477,0.00055539317,0.00009905041,0.0011139808,0.003720182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029935845,0.00028638318,0.00009426067,0.00002518575,0.000032480897,0.00004611705,0.0069156443,0.000004422398,0.00014150295,0.97057444,0.005110217,0.016739413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004176962,0.0002919395,0.0026262705,0.00010439264,0.00009325172,0.0000046169957,0.001250563,0.00007786559,0.00016687896,0.8233417,0.1709903,0.0006344677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007686658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013190428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022924373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004099193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}