{"meta":{"query_hash":"e111c11d794a","filters":{"venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e111c11d794a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E6%94%BF%E6%B2%BB%E5%AD%B8%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%89%80%E5%AD%B8%E4%BD%8D%E8%AB%96%E6%96%87"},"results":[{"id":"W2268075086","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2008.02503","title":"加拿大聯邦和魁北克主權運動(1976-2003)","year":2008,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Nationalism; Sovereignty; Political science; Politics; National Question; Dual federalism; Political economy; Autonomy; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02225598062423716,"score_gpt":0.2230455865796031,"score_spread":0.20078960595536594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268075086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058390778,0.03605979,0.00089433265,0.021402303,0.00270729,0.00011714843,0.006652027,0.00008139475,0.87369484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27325436,0.018109817,0.00064193725,0.0019774444,0.00035680612,0.000063793465,0.00245868,0.00008248012,0.7030546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995384,0.00004993239,0.00001668864,0.000065133805,0.00017575012,0.0001541393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917966,0.00009717898,0.000057027275,0.00004272645,0.00048524197,0.0001381458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044170153,0.00027624928,0.00017404759,0.002099787,0.00663727,0.0028501917,0.00063606084,0.00080119603,0.022492813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015855981,0.00016227248,0.0001746652,0.0054154536,0.0020573589,0.0010989079,0.00063135265,0.0010140588,0.0036467751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015416845,0.00010683683,0.02567096,0.00053224573,0.00001992463,0.0005919416,0.036442805,0.00052065955,0.0006720476,0.2226931,0.54821885,0.16437648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004021744,0.000008014625,0.027810497,0.00024348698,0.000006841987,0.000076624325,0.0040001,0.000052650576,0.00019982464,0.00088169373,0.96670294,0.00001332339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95524216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95173997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04826006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02929444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3501529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286784034","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2013.01537","title":"臺灣原住民族比例進用制度之政經分析，2001-2012","year":2013,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Obligation; Government (linguistics); Promulgation; Procurement; Government procurement; Public administration; Business; Political science; Law; Economic growth; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.14090599298215395,"score_gpt":0.38221733438213046,"score_spread":0.2413113413999765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286784034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3164203,0.004849494,0.0030185417,0.046195343,0.0023016888,0.0012153804,0.0077728983,0.00029966264,0.6179268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5496691,0.0040576286,0.0036423218,0.008024147,0.00032963912,0.00083217595,0.0052754087,0.000055304783,0.42811424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856347,0.00018888887,0.00012888301,0.00014705404,0.00057324587,0.0003983704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974579,0.00054537563,0.00035379035,0.00014528807,0.0013059203,0.00019172285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016653445,0.00015762853,0.00013376192,0.0010185238,0.0019970092,0.002392111,0.0004974384,0.0008125265,0.007905377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007179743,0.0001945707,0.00019148004,0.0015825069,0.0010267079,0.0011335949,0.0007333177,0.00162412,0.0024488228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022049858,0.00053185434,0.110902175,0.0010558623,0.00003406228,0.0023695354,0.039634824,0.00071591896,0.0045249476,0.14364327,0.4603611,0.23600599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019650177,0.00014369174,0.2989686,0.0006065613,0.000023771772,0.00038269884,0.024286436,0.0004519773,0.0025224579,0.0029232465,0.66961056,0.000060293594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09086884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12658083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09086884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033086638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008740871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18067986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301092872","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2009.01739","title":"現代社會與善之回復–Charles Taylor政治哲學之研究","year":2009,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Deliberation; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Liberalism; Contradiction; Modernity; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07827355567215796,"score_gpt":0.35761447538092805,"score_spread":0.27934091970877006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301092872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015680023,0.0684176,0.019404937,0.20767161,0.0033966193,0.000107448664,0.00014148274,0.00010209569,0.68507814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58626807,0.039937496,0.013331076,0.024672601,0.0024586914,0.00017664801,0.000105101775,0.00015439947,0.33289596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986046,0.00044916995,0.00002745018,0.00022615514,0.00055859657,0.0001340812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991804,0.00038806984,0.000058057325,0.000042811887,0.00024466132,0.000086027496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012440024,0.00027050418,0.00019055372,0.0006850094,0.0043142783,0.0042487686,0.00045455786,0.0020823267,0.0029721598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018197483,0.00022961354,0.00017318988,0.00087711174,0.016674545,0.002395306,0.0006953027,0.0038147965,0.001074429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007828913,0.000007889036,0.00013542114,0.00004740745,0.0000027449355,0.000041394058,0.0028785667,0.0002595511,0.00019942634,0.9420846,0.044721153,0.0096139535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047897574,0.000008881197,0.0006260791,0.00016189742,0.0000048745387,0.000068077585,0.0011130517,0.0006442725,0.0003037085,0.2397258,0.7573189,0.000019701842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12594123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09788705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12594123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01492076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010161808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25041634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}