{"meta":{"query_hash":"6250d059d232","filters":{"venue":"한양법학"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6250d059d232","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=%ED%95%9C%EC%96%91%EB%B2%95%ED%95%99"},"results":[{"id":"W1495924087","doi":"","title":"유방암 유전자 특허를 둘러싼 특허분쟁에 대한 고찰","year":2009,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Scope (computer science); Political science; Genetic testing; Genetics; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.10747755672316794,"score_gpt":0.22366538736865424,"score_spread":0.1161878306454863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495924087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099442355,0.0035366097,0.0015573829,0.034376536,0.0002353448,0.00013726951,0.00059104856,0.0002086366,0.8599149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52442086,0.002849999,0.0019427836,0.004566095,0.00016728509,0.00007728087,0.00044873156,0.000038860228,0.46548802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853694,0.00015962416,0.00004041192,0.00021912581,0.0006746808,0.0003692084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975885,0.00084142707,0.00040064505,0.00013147261,0.00057438127,0.000463599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011471802,0.00020708899,0.00012510897,0.0016670664,0.0045621907,0.0049285754,0.00044130656,0.0016782497,0.03761899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050495807,0.00020470413,0.00020901737,0.0017634822,0.0014700566,0.0022134653,0.0016425696,0.002086111,0.004103599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016072749,0.00016236841,0.024476362,0.00014571389,0.000012136797,0.0016453285,0.0030754146,0.00060538814,0.0015181839,0.5369981,0.275367,0.15583338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019316552,0.000083092265,0.015047443,0.00009998333,0.000012935318,0.0012697582,0.00207801,0.0010637168,0.0015241632,0.013705557,0.9650434,0.000052667314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031708106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046961993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03761899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057671843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006171679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12584805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652890660","doi":"","title":"캐나다 판례법상 행정조사의 절차적 공정성 법리에 관한 고찰","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Administrative law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Process (computing); Law; Procedural law; Procedural justice; Legislation; Law and economics; Due process; Common law; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Municipal law","score_opus":0.022235202370268287,"score_gpt":0.24212204512744778,"score_spread":0.21988684275717948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652890660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05714032,0.012364076,0.14136529,0.12962188,0.010461024,0.0009606948,0.00077703374,0.0004619493,0.6468478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7662839,0.006033658,0.053967416,0.05503008,0.0022257785,0.0007763194,0.0005447866,0.00018856846,0.1149495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96481866,0.010174884,0.0049938876,0.007933967,0.009063008,0.0030157191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97358036,0.008324837,0.004390011,0.005563505,0.00715298,0.0009882867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018736776,0.00044866107,0.0008355133,0.0011872676,0.005461489,0.010356524,0.0018057731,0.005572953,0.006817359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03296168,0.00056161225,0.0013486583,0.0015444756,0.02337519,0.007232544,0.00403042,0.007798776,0.0038724726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003698348,0.000034299643,0.0017045506,0.00018295401,0.00003557864,0.00030327795,0.0038414397,0.00023829089,0.0007944931,0.9581431,0.012997549,0.021687508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003829286,0.00021761395,0.00812549,0.00072964263,0.000112224436,0.0011932288,0.003719781,0.0009642946,0.00287844,0.35272047,0.6290799,0.00022075986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011276446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008140337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004801668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138814235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099090755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160729653","doi":"","title":"통일 당위성과 통일편익의 법적기반 조성을 위한 조세 및 토지정책 연구","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Investment (military); Population; Unification; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Geography; Economics; Development economics; Finance; Political science; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.040665516441730214,"score_gpt":0.3091677215647207,"score_spread":0.2685022051229905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160729653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10355586,0.01079208,0.017853295,0.03549315,0.0037392804,0.00017551103,0.0012492198,0.0005460941,0.82659554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60004157,0.0126895625,0.008735333,0.005865472,0.00058798544,0.0001019272,0.0019134512,0.00030582375,0.36975893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922967,0.000144469,0.00004732168,0.0001500874,0.00023534299,0.00019315559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900216,0.00007938182,0.00015250928,0.00010837726,0.00038885357,0.00026876916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008656844,0.0003792128,0.00018260516,0.0006853454,0.0027365957,0.0036200047,0.0004960499,0.00073146576,0.03674902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012280693,0.0002534051,0.00037906427,0.0012810548,0.0013098808,0.003982427,0.0023691289,0.0016071384,0.0103205275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020882348,0.00013412847,0.024674362,0.0010295383,0.000098554396,0.0012945777,0.005367042,0.0010917142,0.006117935,0.4291995,0.23714323,0.2936405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009664142,0.000053519063,0.013979296,0.00020214688,0.000031662883,0.0006112369,0.0040784082,0.00046050534,0.0018846501,0.018076472,0.96056277,0.000049610746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063167284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009167482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03674902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022794476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027649677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1229378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203930612","doi":"","title":"집합동산담보의 활성화에 관한 입법론적 고찰","year":2011,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Economic security; Business; Security through obscurity; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Cloud computing security; Finance; Security information and event management","score_opus":0.04320078157489102,"score_gpt":0.22223115397070373,"score_spread":0.1790303723958127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203930612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015013224,0.0034381414,0.0033608149,0.013656698,0.0016828299,0.000110063585,0.0006573887,0.00030279777,0.9617779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13958402,0.0034737983,0.0026804141,0.0053992625,0.000335553,0.00006224582,0.0009831518,0.00009995598,0.84738165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00010516528,0.000030447753,0.00017529962,0.00038240716,0.00017444292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897385,0.00009101954,0.000081629005,0.00007213585,0.0006100576,0.0001713752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068728207,0.00028658373,0.00018505611,0.00067991484,0.0035544306,0.0036638216,0.0005032893,0.0009651392,0.09594865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014991908,0.00017318988,0.00024087816,0.0008718224,0.001326345,0.0016297454,0.001194685,0.0015755525,0.026352223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748259,0.000094444316,0.005668537,0.00029015975,0.00002032762,0.0007307953,0.0042235334,0.0002870732,0.0023962895,0.28250507,0.51776993,0.18592641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030705066,0.000013452952,0.0037420169,0.00006070019,0.000004599251,0.00017605837,0.0008342675,0.00012497799,0.00053005357,0.004273968,0.99022573,0.000011230022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036991864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046996612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09594865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033744725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053136516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3209802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120180655","doi":"","title":"로마법상 uti possidetis 법리의 근대 국제법에서의 원용 :민족자결 원칙과의 경합을 중심으로","year":2017,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Adjudication; Secession; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Frontier; International law; Independence (probability theory); Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.04045460487685131,"score_gpt":0.3535061560512428,"score_spread":0.3130515511743915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120180655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082332194,0.005395179,0.03190783,0.014405177,0.0005657071,0.00008418463,0.00011332525,0.0001046605,0.8650917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567656,0.0010626931,0.0047470382,0.0012672889,0.00026581835,0.00007791217,0.000035615387,0.000025433756,0.035752464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743915,0.00084059016,0.00014461973,0.00046518916,0.0007606421,0.00034983363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975647,0.0012292799,0.0003353136,0.00037846674,0.000391458,0.00010070447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031966495,0.00024789094,0.00033548396,0.0010011108,0.0062020826,0.005765681,0.00081461726,0.0019211153,0.0040271957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057364656,0.0002892651,0.0003465001,0.0009638035,0.02069084,0.00441543,0.0032133975,0.0038605477,0.00083583384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004709793,0.0000040504183,0.00033189004,0.000019624773,0.0000011924927,0.000049000842,0.0041057765,0.00002590559,0.00010994593,0.9891801,0.0008708723,0.005296888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016936889,0.00007111722,0.003757323,0.0003835303,0.000014518962,0.0012971025,0.007474154,0.0006925603,0.001951971,0.44021702,0.54407483,0.000048921007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036841754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068811607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062020826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030152604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030185664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021877408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}