{"meta":{"query_hash":"5dd81971a891","filters":{"venue":"2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5dd81971a891","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=2001+Annual+meeting%2C+August+5-8%2C+Chicago%2C+IL"},"results":[{"id":"W1483820535","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.20619","title":"CHINA'S ACCESSION TO THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL MARKETS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; China; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Business; Livestock; Agribusiness; Revenue; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Agricultural science; International trade; Economics; European union; Geography","score_opus":0.021470794753235208,"score_gpt":0.23449661414388742,"score_spread":0.2130258193906522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483820535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98712987,0.0004353643,0.00018266795,0.0015547831,0.00003490178,0.000022499964,0.0010334135,0.000030575156,0.009575888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721295,0.000391956,0.000041326755,0.00014564619,0.000018484934,0.000009128828,0.0006154842,0.000006833396,0.0015581904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964154,0.00005104889,0.000011388702,0.000036933616,0.00007221437,0.00018686037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985257,0.0002837268,0.0005943781,0.00005169099,0.00017730297,0.00036727378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008158661,0.00036893805,0.00048192806,0.0010160378,0.0009146537,0.0031611205,0.00053882314,0.0009086987,0.00576582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002322008,0.00017626012,0.00060129154,0.0019088928,0.0009071295,0.0011961579,0.0012023328,0.0009998716,0.00027612396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007689711,0.0005192723,0.8075482,0.00017341958,0.00036099344,0.003215231,0.00063497527,0.09365922,0.0013111469,0.03873619,0.017044956,0.036027342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014533098,0.00029265197,0.8359375,0.000076069715,0.00021991902,0.00019806242,0.0015157636,0.14409477,0.000941603,0.0065817973,0.009927281,0.00006922132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12519214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12025696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12519214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039040705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032280153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24892688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122909501","doi":"","title":"Management Perspectives On The Impacts Of Nafta On The U.S. Textile And Apparel Industries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Textile; Prosperity; Textile industry; Interdependence; Business; International trade; Clothing industry; Commerce; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.01709331244159798,"score_gpt":0.22427219520076558,"score_spread":0.2071788827591676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122909501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039983805,0.048601583,0.0005817613,0.64930636,0.0025550683,0.000013750276,0.00016875615,0.000022411128,0.25876647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79166627,0.091350906,0.0009932701,0.082996905,0.0045314045,0.000058245176,0.00018193557,0.0000245203,0.028196579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512637,0.002047575,0.0001304292,0.00021193169,0.0013341816,0.0011495329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968816,0.0009847217,0.0004257585,0.000048654598,0.0012591761,0.0004000022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005619474,0.00054485037,0.00025251828,0.0032542464,0.008702104,0.011757509,0.00075202197,0.004704885,0.0064202226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004056892,0.00024096131,0.00040830363,0.003676575,0.005908299,0.0043097376,0.0024255938,0.0036220883,0.0005792152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015230801,0.00017147133,0.014559935,0.00058621186,0.000071263035,0.0036031252,0.03216255,0.0016432334,0.0021994219,0.5663895,0.26356843,0.11489249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018896526,0.00009996272,0.015383219,0.001421235,0.000039218678,0.00033121684,0.08144594,0.00044096363,0.0006403189,0.070890255,0.82923406,0.000054703793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045553964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09878849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045553964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008007088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011169902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0905776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122914537","doi":"","title":"Price Discrimination In The Context Of Vertical Differentiation: A Modeling Approach For Wheat Exports","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economics; Quality (philosophy); Price discrimination; Empirical research; Product differentiation; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.03107857094294494,"score_gpt":0.24099680829507766,"score_spread":0.20991823735213272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122914537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5441347,0.0016536019,0.34537828,0.0066592796,0.00013783111,0.00019580085,0.00077840756,0.0001815812,0.10088055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680148,0.0008525831,0.013737651,0.00018853438,0.00008207195,0.00007836104,0.00015005062,0.000035106073,0.016860873],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997241,0.00008856446,0.0000075965204,0.000041356492,0.000047903915,0.00009042896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992849,0.0003514493,0.00015925303,0.000045182835,0.00008176391,0.00007749332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097432267,0.0007152655,0.00067329674,0.0008051938,0.0011030717,0.002251934,0.0016888517,0.0020403564,0.006008019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027438358,0.00037293855,0.0014199641,0.001061856,0.0012962031,0.0017253482,0.0015217221,0.0016687958,0.00049069925],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051494342,0.00012370816,0.007215266,0.00004001421,0.000052681768,0.00039586233,0.0005162378,0.5338127,0.00074159243,0.44804966,0.0016930136,0.0073076696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038626084,0.000058296617,0.002406949,0.000022948054,0.00003471453,0.000087276145,0.00027236014,0.91262835,0.000091628135,0.08107338,0.0032568625,0.00002857179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07457484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050451815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07457484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034520861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019011779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14828151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126086929","doi":"","title":"Cost Effective Targeting Of Land Retirement To Improve Water Quality: A Multi-Watershed Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Acre; Watershed; Ton; Environmental science; Sediment; Payment; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Watershed management; Marginal cost; STREAMS; Land use; Hydrology (agriculture); Economics; Engineering; Geography; Civil engineering; Computer science; Agricultural science; Streamflow; Drainage basin","score_opus":0.01613126404787484,"score_gpt":0.2564448043982294,"score_spread":0.24031354035035457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126086929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7757912,0.0006420861,0.19624329,0.0017922104,0.000048283884,0.00046986554,0.0010149062,0.00021781825,0.023780374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724372,0.00027750383,0.022916874,0.00006943652,0.000018369567,0.00012625393,0.00016589295,0.000030661013,0.0039578793],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925596,0.00030353596,0.000019430776,0.00010907876,0.00011832023,0.00019374164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891484,0.00058470824,0.00014562953,0.000053050942,0.00018548784,0.00011630314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016058672,0.00069344154,0.0009904612,0.0013334297,0.0005724448,0.001698369,0.0015458172,0.0014009378,0.004836288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023940552,0.0005994256,0.0013657263,0.0012767268,0.0007898208,0.0017248802,0.0014337561,0.00086262054,0.00014246772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032542786,0.00008194234,0.002793265,0.000017322021,0.000038812977,0.00006686235,0.00001419566,0.9884228,0.00027200827,0.00438912,0.00018524796,0.0036858562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010294119,0.00005334861,0.001467455,0.0000044750363,0.0000319594,0.000009709076,0.000045908266,0.9966673,0.0000982025,0.0013621039,0.00024248096,0.0000066476573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05636743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0426879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05636743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052594403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003208796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11207867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}