{"meta":{"query_hash":"dcae019e29fd","filters":{"venue":"2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dcae019e29fd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=2002+Annual+meeting%2C+July+28-31%2C+Long+Beach%2C+CA"},"results":[{"id":"W3121407675","doi":"","title":"Patent Breadth As An Entry Deterrent: The Case Of Vertically Differentiated Product Innovations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Innovator; Monopoly; Intellectual property; Incentive; Competitor analysis; Economic rent; Product (mathematics); Patent troll; Business; Industrial organization; Competition (biology); Economics; Exclusive right; Law and economics; Patent law; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.0790529882518787,"score_gpt":0.23346647730775014,"score_spread":0.15441348905587143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121407675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45216715,0.011564294,0.061651047,0.028845353,0.00026847137,0.0002807552,0.00027986555,0.000104420644,0.4448386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815114,0.0018678525,0.0029861068,0.0009896697,0.00031004893,0.00007911787,0.000022193653,0.000019574589,0.012213986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963211,0.001071605,0.00012907929,0.00041501873,0.0007948194,0.0012683227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898601,0.005915286,0.0017661499,0.0008962084,0.0006149319,0.00094743277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048260447,0.0007894574,0.0024440086,0.0020068446,0.0036912956,0.0075934334,0.0021262667,0.012412119,0.009038532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009890309,0.00080230524,0.002380181,0.0012911434,0.008595448,0.00710914,0.0062640645,0.0065656896,0.00070567825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008101657,0.000048718237,0.0012814344,0.00007085379,0.000022664168,0.0023846,0.0003949413,0.0030193438,0.001062039,0.9873281,0.00090727553,0.0033989768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024634562,0.00016101629,0.0018350839,0.0001905804,0.00008362964,0.001834686,0.0006344285,0.035056133,0.00089903735,0.94623756,0.012719314,0.00010220353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007292639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055784252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012412119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033282991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019129898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0302369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121844320","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Evaluation Of The Canadian Wheat Board'S Ability To Price Discriminate In Bread Wheat Exports","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economics; Price discrimination; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.03865942232534861,"score_gpt":0.27680807926545137,"score_spread":0.23814865694010276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121844320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98862106,0.00015852357,0.00015625427,0.0005234792,0.0000059164367,0.000015416404,0.0005320045,0.000008101222,0.009979352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979493,0.00008970777,0.00009146262,0.000051171697,0.0000036937201,0.0000032725702,0.00057149475,0.0000033019194,0.0012366115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864966,0.00019321752,0.000046125737,0.00019162051,0.00059016346,0.0003292812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895642,0.0040123602,0.002053094,0.0005475964,0.0025629853,0.0012597067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027026667,0.00023871804,0.0002858873,0.0010757037,0.0020277144,0.0018116048,0.0008430029,0.0006001833,0.0034867183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018686287,0.00017097252,0.00034964338,0.0025167416,0.0018950441,0.0009118527,0.00077717047,0.00084326207,0.00018998315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003243711,0.00010756138,0.9719143,0.00004504149,0.00009843371,0.00019764106,0.0014918695,0.0029718156,0.00035574252,0.0059855627,0.003228695,0.013278913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002247682,0.000040397703,0.9907087,0.000012890252,0.00002588848,0.000030914707,0.0019450556,0.002991976,0.00011932881,0.00035581915,0.0037287963,0.00001772895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94278544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9519866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057214558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012971119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007668418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11510295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123362446","doi":"","title":"The Measurement Of Inequality In Canadian And U.S. Agricultural Income By Components Of Net Value Added","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Net income; Economics; Value (mathematics); Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Agriculture; Income distribution; Net asset value; Net farm income; Agricultural economics; Production (economics); Farm income; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02277585901984992,"score_gpt":0.21031923176500458,"score_spread":0.18754337274515467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123362446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93971336,0.0010467479,0.0010740529,0.00063302164,0.000027309941,0.000034601155,0.015068951,0.000037571375,0.042364363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222356,0.00043018212,0.0005222393,0.00004662812,0.000010010506,0.000011062988,0.0052108765,0.000008352518,0.0015370745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988355,0.00005452597,0.000037144568,0.00012260237,0.00068467285,0.00026556218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742633,0.00016434868,0.00053978537,0.00007909622,0.0014505927,0.00033977246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006338061,0.0003074639,0.00028232436,0.0048520686,0.0018448522,0.0015843735,0.0007089255,0.00014571828,0.0019424481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044205077,0.00012062962,0.00031231137,0.010315055,0.0009978395,0.0007005886,0.0011826375,0.00060424587,0.0001955309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005869657,0.000019628515,0.9723575,0.00004194615,0.00010666126,0.000049587285,0.0013759366,0.0014714012,0.00028479454,0.0038083184,0.0030272277,0.017398337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011308304,0.000003867283,0.9968436,0.000015665171,0.000009231105,0.000011429307,0.00043867464,0.00049678306,0.00008465395,0.00013542027,0.0019525541,0.000006963579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98436755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018860608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018860608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012418187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13684392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}