{"meta":{"query_hash":"d9221b924994","filters":{"venue":"2005 Meeting Papers"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d9221b924994","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=2005+Meeting+Papers"},"results":[{"id":"W1509736614","doi":"","title":"STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING IN SPACE: AN APPLICATION TO BRITISH COLUMBIA FORESTRY","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2005 Meeting Papers","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic programming; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Yield (engineering); Stochastic programming; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.003616044817122917,"score_gpt":0.22188554222189322,"score_spread":0.2182694974047703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509736614","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39351556,0.0046307542,0.515431,0.009199075,0.00019498983,0.00020160343,0.0021209843,0.00067898975,0.074027106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.916966,0.0023625686,0.055686414,0.00019995378,0.000061006358,0.00017247698,0.00045318098,0.00009741484,0.024000965],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.00014917953,0.000014540012,0.00005676522,0.000078324425,0.00007414752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989254,0.0007026195,0.00009679358,0.000044648332,0.00013772592,0.00009276971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006725804,0.0007391418,0.00091512845,0.0008007151,0.0015096241,0.0021485128,0.0014002816,0.0014253564,0.006114899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038138055,0.000471919,0.00064704294,0.0028207237,0.0014316876,0.0010811193,0.0013858911,0.0019001992,0.00032512136],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021029737,0.000028480243,0.0013514247,0.000032527725,0.000024954456,0.00015701886,0.00012732374,0.87464213,0.00017940362,0.114343844,0.001661925,0.007429871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001553551,0.0000072609746,0.0006447368,0.000011439971,0.000007956328,0.00002249005,0.000090768204,0.9517419,0.00005435111,0.043679938,0.0037063053,0.000017366025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7074131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.574423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29258692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011015862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068425206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58862007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151263573","doi":"","title":"Dynamic Screening: A Role for Up-or-Out Contracts ⁄","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2005 Meeting Papers","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Wage; Microeconomics; Inference; Sequence (biology); Computer science; Incentive; Process (computing); Observable; Schedule; Efficiency wage; Economics; Econometrics; Labour economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06360244130251613,"score_gpt":0.3776568069732962,"score_spread":0.31405436567078004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151263573","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08473189,0.00090226246,0.76353186,0.008166275,0.00028396252,0.000830589,0.0005211924,0.0004877261,0.1405442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904356,0.0003173985,0.069502115,0.0011365876,0.00019009889,0.00053570454,0.000081755206,0.00006313987,0.02381721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98864615,0.0070842,0.000501209,0.0015836161,0.0012122429,0.00097253727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650393,0.022425463,0.0045142137,0.005048534,0.0013516254,0.0016208976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144075425,0.0010522623,0.0016921086,0.0007727082,0.002176984,0.0050578164,0.0029129095,0.00645253,0.013281609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040546935,0.0010853565,0.001400607,0.0008622166,0.0061471392,0.00761541,0.002572205,0.0062887752,0.0012071484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077958386,0.00006948511,0.0005545373,0.00004320782,0.000016279246,0.00019252408,0.00021445868,0.003820262,0.00057536416,0.9859378,0.000959259,0.0075389063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012025043,0.000121998935,0.00038034547,0.00006940968,0.000023670787,0.00025536088,0.00011331993,0.04435042,0.00072527205,0.94459414,0.009200005,0.00004583764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014049908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012097429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144075425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027093466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035513395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0761953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}