{"meta":{"query_hash":"cc2e27e8533b","filters":{"venue":"2008 Meeting Papers"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cc2e27e8533b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=2008+Meeting+Papers"},"results":[{"id":"W1490141975","doi":"","title":"Pacifying Monogamy: The Mystery Revisited ∗","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2008 Meeting Papers","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ruler; Polygyny; Economic shortage; Wife; Subject (documents); Population; Phenomenon; Sociology; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Demography; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023267527370269832,"score_gpt":0.2816657951640924,"score_spread":0.2583982677938226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490141975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22208896,0.015812049,0.0820135,0.30826607,0.0018647223,0.0000782643,0.00031945205,0.00029594626,0.36926106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96382284,0.0038262352,0.0048498632,0.009883332,0.0008726283,0.000043808424,0.000037431688,0.000054997985,0.016608922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906784,0.00034091834,0.000029550694,0.0002884542,0.00015258565,0.00012065097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795246,0.0010190652,0.00021525283,0.00036912828,0.00021831815,0.000225755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024586632,0.0002519452,0.00078352913,0.0003554574,0.002205199,0.0032991625,0.0015250506,0.004164312,0.015883634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074804425,0.0002313147,0.00032346023,0.0005103413,0.015899206,0.0055908635,0.0023229602,0.003078333,0.0014790674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024004441,0.000011477238,0.0014040618,0.000042848325,0.000010445252,0.00019943119,0.000616533,0.00047793487,0.0002768672,0.97366375,0.004569891,0.018702704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013541619,0.000030146632,0.0017735615,0.00005931813,0.0000070346186,0.00044271644,0.0013089587,0.00233021,0.00015661308,0.96140075,0.03245825,0.000018795532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002306683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002899225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015883634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095812476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010822559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05313599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602118484","doi":"","title":"Holdups and Overinvestment in Physical Capital Markets with Matching Frictions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2008 Meeting Papers","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Economics; Matching (statistics); Physical capital; Renting; Productivity; Marginal product of capital; Order (exchange); Wright; General equilibrium theory; Capital allocation line; Microeconomics; Capital intensity; Downtown; Consumption (sociology); Econometrics; Monetary economics; Capital formation; Financial capital; Macroeconomics; Finance; Mathematics; Computer science; Market economy; Engineering; Human capital; Statistics","score_opus":0.013454732311903448,"score_gpt":0.17933584437819086,"score_spread":0.16588111206628742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602118484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8656178,0.002177162,0.09739611,0.0045437226,0.00009913684,0.00010183519,0.00025035822,0.00019459317,0.02961928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405473,0.00034445742,0.0011005321,0.00009106746,0.000033086697,0.00001735628,0.000018526549,0.000009136596,0.004331155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984029,0.00058062485,0.000072464856,0.00021337031,0.00014999282,0.00058068667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99134934,0.0036482376,0.003490383,0.00058512506,0.00022589364,0.00070098514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004393521,0.0008697921,0.0017402422,0.00079215365,0.0012037468,0.004453237,0.0013860315,0.0029938337,0.009473579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013647308,0.0011148253,0.0008537402,0.0009411451,0.0042509707,0.0074805417,0.0028422016,0.0018657411,0.00038877927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005072753,0.00023506253,0.006542979,0.00022910873,0.000097987795,0.0016738018,0.0005213715,0.26511183,0.0020816082,0.70686966,0.0024241265,0.013705222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028728877,0.00016710207,0.004667784,0.000059376736,0.00007442783,0.0003438227,0.00055563066,0.21867494,0.000886566,0.7708422,0.0033721281,0.00006872783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046130563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022488816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009473579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002083512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001392036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031692326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124743025","doi":"","title":"On-the-Job Search and Business Cycles","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2008 Meeting Papers","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Business cycle; Unemployment; Recession; Productivity; Volatility (finance); Aggregate (composite); Beveridge curve; Wage; Econometrics; Labour economics; Macroeconomics; Unemployment rate","score_opus":0.03467085866894498,"score_gpt":0.22065966253032837,"score_spread":0.1859888038613834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124743025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7213933,0.0041841636,0.1830445,0.01139544,0.00013871284,0.00018700417,0.0014527604,0.0002560741,0.07794807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846095,0.0010241056,0.0024400393,0.00020630985,0.000051900555,0.0000554925,0.00018348337,0.000013988774,0.011415114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997013,0.000103302285,0.000010759684,0.00006245181,0.000033359727,0.00008877334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991602,0.00035255039,0.0002604048,0.000054547443,0.000042395306,0.00012995921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053554925,0.00041310952,0.0008895772,0.00043592424,0.0005554132,0.0021185775,0.0011615476,0.0018730182,0.008882045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035235356,0.00039092236,0.0005013644,0.00068038027,0.000855253,0.0022357085,0.0007197127,0.00095388247,0.0009957635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002240379,0.0002404831,0.018608114,0.00011330605,0.0000706894,0.0006901623,0.00039047515,0.44733655,0.0007989266,0.5071403,0.005539072,0.0188479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009434374,0.000079963946,0.0069980556,0.00005751343,0.00003185002,0.00021706292,0.0002969368,0.7705211,0.00015593595,0.21563841,0.005874619,0.000034175555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011391625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008248201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011391625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011301398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011181233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029713392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}