{"meta":{"query_hash":"acda9e2a9c47","filters":{"venue":"2011 Meeting Papers"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/acda9e2a9c47","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=2011+Meeting+Papers"},"results":[{"id":"W310738091","doi":"","title":"Consumption Risk Sharing, the Real Exchange Rate, and Borders: Why Does the Exchange Rate Make Such a Difference?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2011 Meeting Papers","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exchange rate; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Econometrics; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.08574972339624667,"score_gpt":0.2339482180263843,"score_spread":0.14819849463013762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310738091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660267,0.005313656,0.009829153,0.009279804,0.0001205884,0.000020125417,0.00054296077,0.000034068256,0.008833001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813336,0.00062521326,0.00043459842,0.00023862702,0.00008181187,0.000005062595,0.00014486813,0.000007170737,0.00032918283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989452,0.00048653895,0.00008519059,0.00025764835,0.00012582203,0.00009964588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857302,0.0065958444,0.0053745327,0.0014754869,0.0003314289,0.0004925373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027990923,0.0002970593,0.0011004573,0.00059748883,0.00045550888,0.0025551976,0.0005964925,0.0010775431,0.0039086887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015261622,0.00020997477,0.0006567079,0.0015370717,0.0019390825,0.0042936187,0.0016771188,0.0014508456,0.00033338144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014772491,0.00017421719,0.75170237,0.00040053806,0.0014812839,0.0012800618,0.0043731313,0.013493207,0.0014862976,0.14323567,0.0049289092,0.07596711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000226906,0.00033604357,0.65779185,0.00040066,0.0008365747,0.0010026027,0.007342436,0.022572048,0.0017317081,0.292717,0.014887169,0.00015503852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018355761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011985154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039086887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038338368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024075554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014803171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123528041","doi":"","title":"The Exchange Rate Response Puzzle","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2011 Meeting Papers","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Exchange rate; Interest rate; Monetary economics; Monetary policy; Depreciation (economics); Currency; Market liquidity; Nominal interest rate; Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium; Fiscal policy; Macroeconomics; Real interest rate; Capital formation; Microeconomics; Financial capital","score_opus":0.10219472233686783,"score_gpt":0.21280483660432342,"score_spread":0.1106101142674556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123528041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57701635,0.013644193,0.051848516,0.16036275,0.0017631818,0.00007276931,0.002375217,0.0009542517,0.19196272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822307,0.0028242064,0.0014235178,0.0039903843,0.00059637736,0.00003936808,0.00035159112,0.00008143947,0.00846244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916816,0.00040054135,0.00004590331,0.00017180655,0.00013241194,0.000081206366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969796,0.0015298758,0.0006471881,0.00048697143,0.00022412256,0.0001322723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020966907,0.00034138438,0.0006135058,0.0005064643,0.0004209051,0.0027895323,0.00083042955,0.002284623,0.010195961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014949858,0.00024463693,0.0006337684,0.00066593866,0.00091418024,0.0035315056,0.0009893709,0.002319206,0.0018128029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039793545,0.00010986757,0.01212557,0.00018580131,0.00013016276,0.00095715775,0.0005548052,0.034788385,0.0011657987,0.8706241,0.03679312,0.04216734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000247123,0.00007033346,0.010475299,0.00011114544,0.00006143721,0.00094408635,0.0006064124,0.0669531,0.0006973839,0.8773451,0.042421676,0.00006690446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010232467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003805932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010195961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008214869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040190338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034108937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125087010","doi":"","title":"Fixed-Term and Permanent Employment Contracts: Theory and Evidence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2011 Meeting Papers","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Term (time); Externality; Fixed cost; Labour economics; Economics; Wage; Microeconomics; Quality (philosophy); Ex-ante; Business","score_opus":0.04354364510876123,"score_gpt":0.2332449292978268,"score_spread":0.18970128418906557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125087010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73231614,0.070947714,0.050255742,0.020582015,0.0002228411,0.00012903207,0.0017068989,0.000083818275,0.12375574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864994,0.00945726,0.0016176372,0.00037074016,0.00019403003,0.000020223579,0.00033826646,0.000012419869,0.0014900063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969066,0.00076436595,0.00022127293,0.00064201374,0.0010713992,0.00039438566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9031416,0.07360542,0.013587077,0.0038365887,0.0041143675,0.0017150115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007348251,0.00038087304,0.0011201559,0.0026853802,0.0018590436,0.0050186613,0.0026427046,0.0026858107,0.0153057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03559176,0.0005995787,0.00046153148,0.004168985,0.007742557,0.006721929,0.0017962517,0.00300769,0.00096904224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005666756,0.00040988394,0.1088156,0.0009104133,0.00017445377,0.0005494342,0.0018159684,0.008207058,0.00020486361,0.7614595,0.0043356474,0.11255058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025984447,0.00029468056,0.13924664,0.0019416856,0.00018642518,0.0010310316,0.004714547,0.033461258,0.0005641958,0.78040606,0.037773512,0.000120064775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013398773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005611327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027674169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017747021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051202655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}