{"meta":{"query_hash":"eeca2487daa4","filters":{"venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/eeca2487daa4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=2020+International+Conference+on+Decision+Aid+Sciences+and+Application+%28DASA%29"},"results":[{"id":"W3121303911","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317099","title":"Performance Evaluation of Pulp and Paper Mills: Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Data envelopment analysis; Pulp (tooth); Paper mill; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Computer science; Waste management; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.3436265996403101,"score_gpt":0.4519933642814951,"score_spread":0.108366764641185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121303911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86659235,0.00027764056,0.1060309,0.009747338,0.00012832924,0.0005110614,0.00012032796,0.00003173312,0.016560325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898019,0.0004933228,0.008846018,0.0006384944,0.000049851045,0.000026624955,0.000071012015,0.000005011844,0.000067763634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925175,0.00019955791,0.0009730507,0.0014677432,0.004649225,0.00019294478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690884,0.00054219854,0.00060603285,0.00074060133,0.0010016977,0.00020061112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007208929,0.00020270268,0.00040060034,0.00048536024,0.00031673125,0.0005025577,0.0021879382,0.00007810748,0.0007679493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017259081,0.00014954017,0.000082377985,0.002694228,0.0005022806,0.0007802798,0.00055739377,0.0001463237,0.000061217186],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014612061,0.0002108542,0.03529636,0.000007213628,0.0001915009,5.660815e-7,0.0009318846,0.029197339,0.002978467,0.01640995,0.002114258,0.91251546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038388814,0.00008246741,0.03580025,0.0000135025075,0.00012472681,0.0000020973794,0.0008891433,0.9553943,0.0001684878,0.0024872778,0.0044880644,0.00016576126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002276323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019683033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033465363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002079448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8408507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124628641","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317031","title":"Natural Gas Pipeline Failure Risk Prediction and Relation Analysis by Combining Rough-AHP and Rough DEMATEL Method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Rough set; Production (economics); Failure mode and effects analysis; Pipeline (software); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Relation (database); Natural gas; Gas pipeline; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Business; Engineering; Data mining; Petroleum engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.019679591359917835,"score_gpt":0.29571224620972036,"score_spread":0.27603265484980255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124628641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5351749,0.00044588975,0.45347267,0.009386404,0.00015262715,0.000234973,0.00015130035,0.0001372486,0.00084398506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850399,0.00163902,0.012899451,0.00019859374,0.00006193887,0.00001708233,0.00009488931,0.0000065429754,0.00004260637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983741,0.00006122557,0.00040405671,0.0005509888,0.0004747646,0.0001348486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991843,0.0002671821,0.00014191332,0.00011843483,0.00014669125,0.00014146304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000407036,0.0001815134,0.00025844347,0.00014444097,0.00027478972,0.00030813893,0.00022225226,0.00011742717,0.000118893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021668126,0.00014688057,0.00006730347,0.0007278565,0.00016307078,0.00039898627,0.00007445137,0.00032815718,0.000009071128],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058034516,0.00011752251,0.05885892,0.0001168038,0.0012409184,0.0000049143555,0.0036835738,0.26781696,0.036081776,0.073847406,0.011763643,0.54588723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032150143,0.000055911278,0.007362587,0.000018550543,0.00011998277,0.000006465808,0.0004083235,0.9833912,0.00038187465,0.00551615,0.002265996,0.00015140862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006614346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003610189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71557426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003063622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011633916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5989616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125017991","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317022","title":"Municipal Infrastructure Prioritization based on Consequence-Based Decision-Making Framework","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Risk analysis (engineering); Expert opinion; Computer science; Causal structure; Management science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.020319077621194996,"score_gpt":0.31047705462582337,"score_spread":0.29015797700462836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125017991","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15231565,0.000031045234,0.84009486,0.0033804958,0.00024889217,0.00026745276,0.000051274597,0.00014204941,0.0034682513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620412,0.00007703881,0.03478661,0.0028735115,0.00014506554,0.00003623624,0.000023424713,0.000013575628,0.0000033546926],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976206,0.000046569618,0.00045040305,0.0006420547,0.0010030358,0.00023736958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845475,0.0007390647,0.00012978057,0.00029458894,0.00020209781,0.00017972848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032200498,0.0002579762,0.000250037,0.00021128955,0.00031930982,0.00037060704,0.00072208454,0.00016663427,0.0010254697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068074337,0.00022216108,0.000089565714,0.00084927597,0.00028906003,0.00022849067,0.00005418761,0.00038436754,0.000069505215],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001308698,0.000020592555,0.0013817754,0.000012201711,0.000010243554,0.0000043800665,0.00012612111,0.86665815,0.00076660607,0.0189376,0.0004411672,0.11151028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031476901,0.00013230398,0.0022171726,0.00019186284,0.000009593558,0.0000027056162,0.00016465713,0.96748066,0.0003742201,0.02557139,0.003305147,0.0002354992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004543453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000075106104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008908331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099248326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125671060","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317286","title":"Development of a Collaborative Decision-Making Framework to Improve the Patients' Service Quality in the Intensive Care Unit","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Service (business); Process management; Quality (philosophy); Service quality; Process (computing); Key (lock); Business; Quality management; Computer science; Knowledge management; Operations management; Marketing; Engineering; Public relations","score_opus":0.15719023875440508,"score_gpt":0.501584559445802,"score_spread":0.34439432069139697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125671060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93727744,0.000029864796,0.031006621,0.027635274,0.0004531654,0.0018812951,0.00014518508,0.0000204542,0.001550724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96522516,0.000028677241,0.013773718,0.02043107,0.00006614377,0.00044548177,0.000018079445,0.000006851333,0.000004815792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967196,0.00036691158,0.00094414037,0.0005491643,0.0011911589,0.0002290184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266094,0.0031555698,0.0005807436,0.0002916908,0.0031878192,0.0001232188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010308331,0.00016729429,0.00023042454,0.000113998874,0.00085639046,0.00006214695,0.0009344923,0.000113416,0.00021400632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032661892,0.00010293636,0.000028955788,0.0013982586,0.00012075159,0.00015205673,0.00031344916,0.0005047231,0.00013244228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001013107,0.000056148805,0.41872245,0.00009174438,0.000019875824,6.637654e-7,0.18270472,0.00046597724,0.00023484937,0.12823585,0.0012480455,0.26720658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000985433,0.00028998885,0.6100332,0.0009951032,0.0000065530894,3.1339138e-7,0.3478018,0.007913316,0.000063112755,0.011995548,0.019635752,0.00027986555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081704326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058988907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2669267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012205124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055615895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65867496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}