{"meta":{"query_hash":"eeca2487daa4","filters":{"venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/eeca2487daa4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=2020+International+Conference+on+Decision+Aid+Sciences+and+Application+%28DASA%29"},"results":[{"id":"W3121303911","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317099","title":"Performance Evaluation of Pulp and Paper Mills: Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Data envelopment analysis; Pulp (tooth); Paper mill; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Computer science; Waste management; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.3436265996403101,"score_gpt":0.4519933642814951,"score_spread":0.108366764641185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121303911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70228964,0.0006270491,0.28217435,0.00034344834,0.000016944621,0.0004239532,0.0010473164,0.00012745534,0.012949894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703564,0.0002018496,0.028081443,0.000018340525,0.0000046541127,0.0001644248,0.00054142,0.000013467405,0.00061804213],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368864,0.003497395,0.00028158678,0.00030044964,0.001847041,0.00038488992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857793,0.009816823,0.0010099312,0.0008343566,0.0024186857,0.00014090916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01188614,0.0007534185,0.0013753682,0.0025806318,0.00059835904,0.0018175676,0.0007382069,0.0008243034,0.0011693009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02844108,0.00030211874,0.0011536464,0.004632745,0.0006432183,0.001365331,0.00091975124,0.00073112774,0.00021880961],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047053304,0.00030302032,0.03505501,0.00030404792,0.00035206863,0.00016307451,0.00046659177,0.86338234,0.0017316687,0.019499589,0.0009940042,0.07727812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020433683,0.00030890523,0.019666258,0.00006727658,0.000043059677,0.000028577853,0.0006613547,0.9680589,0.0018461378,0.008008652,0.0012551857,0.000035248977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021873355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012671915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021873355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035106144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034437382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06286067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124628641","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317031","title":"Natural Gas Pipeline Failure Risk Prediction and Relation Analysis by Combining Rough-AHP and Rough DEMATEL Method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Rough set; Production (economics); Failure mode and effects analysis; Pipeline (software); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Relation (database); Natural gas; Gas pipeline; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Business; Engineering; Data mining; Petroleum engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.019679591359917835,"score_gpt":0.29571224620972036,"score_spread":0.27603265484980255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124628641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03307892,0.00025849242,0.9642536,0.0001969412,0.000022729711,0.0001740234,0.00021874039,0.00029250048,0.0015040382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73519224,0.00046408,0.2617031,0.000061219864,0.000039137245,0.000512377,0.0006234391,0.000042886808,0.0013615421],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782807,0.00066604826,0.00020219923,0.00027343497,0.00086138945,0.00016882991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794644,0.0011849973,0.0002472375,0.00007972818,0.0004800056,0.000061592014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021043972,0.0009655291,0.001223387,0.0033173067,0.0007139351,0.001591266,0.0009924255,0.00073014357,0.0015430276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046482724,0.0005947494,0.0018502119,0.0017376952,0.00047378903,0.0013352844,0.0010124278,0.00088169397,0.00019691522],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085561645,0.00008718416,0.0038965635,0.00026569603,0.00014290886,0.0002026495,0.00020481137,0.9136283,0.0016487674,0.005134649,0.0011898231,0.07351305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073222523,0.000027604761,0.0006092103,0.000014315972,0.000018970773,0.000026733185,0.00004678407,0.9944547,0.00037016658,0.004078646,0.00033222444,0.0000134185175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012271581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006773529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012271581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012707727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019317413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024400294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125017991","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317022","title":"Municipal Infrastructure Prioritization based on Consequence-Based Decision-Making Framework","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Prioritization; Risk analysis (engineering); Expert opinion; Computer science; Causal structure; Management science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.020319077621194996,"score_gpt":0.31047705462582337,"score_spread":0.29015797700462836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125017991","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0462237,0.00020064213,0.94150543,0.0006077227,0.000032083608,0.00068508537,0.0002056458,0.00015066749,0.010389084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70119154,0.0002221958,0.29650572,0.00011251297,0.00002710355,0.00073227176,0.00026667133,0.000021064106,0.00092092063],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943916,0.0028663254,0.00043579692,0.00054986443,0.0013679229,0.00038849123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956975,0.0025330314,0.0004486868,0.00017756216,0.00093618984,0.00020710673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008164774,0.0011245694,0.0009789062,0.003597197,0.0011320033,0.0030645367,0.001778775,0.001006215,0.0028419625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009290414,0.0003547859,0.0014997814,0.0016568264,0.001973422,0.0023286252,0.0018173982,0.0010909021,0.00015523883],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016753482,0.00031220724,0.008020141,0.00067445927,0.00023803233,0.00089975045,0.0017063521,0.63896954,0.0029488995,0.26545584,0.0017083685,0.078898884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007073785,0.00014404162,0.0015694139,0.00013503742,0.00012205817,0.00013152052,0.00060899404,0.8092011,0.0012566763,0.18409914,0.0026011849,0.00006002321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004272683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005745118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008164774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032802161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005274532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04317999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125671060","doi":"10.1109/dasa51403.2020.9317286","title":"Development of a Collaborative Decision-Making Framework to Improve the Patients' Service Quality in the Intensive Care Unit","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA)","topic":"Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Service (business); Process management; Quality (philosophy); Service quality; Process (computing); Key (lock); Business; Quality management; Computer science; Knowledge management; Operations management; Marketing; Engineering; Public relations","score_opus":0.15719023875440508,"score_gpt":0.501584559445802,"score_spread":0.34439432069139697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125671060","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029647745,0.00063958485,0.94622475,0.0028412156,0.00008503608,0.0009907855,0.0001734842,0.0001483794,0.019248936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37428707,0.00047771333,0.62257314,0.00021485375,0.00004369967,0.00096243265,0.00023698316,0.000016297792,0.0011879046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118793,0.0058344435,0.0005542877,0.0007168581,0.0011945298,0.0005119054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958425,0.0025926235,0.00036762017,0.00014969664,0.00070081995,0.0003467005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112650115,0.0011566426,0.0009792075,0.0025312703,0.0022610947,0.004002844,0.0019974313,0.001742219,0.0026419493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00816579,0.00038032967,0.001709569,0.0023054115,0.0017311012,0.0029458306,0.0038702383,0.0017215154,0.0002296628],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016288938,0.000591109,0.006906376,0.0010780537,0.0003002871,0.00093119626,0.0057670022,0.34338468,0.0032408345,0.46224374,0.0048205266,0.17057332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009032903,0.00024746128,0.0013050527,0.00039618244,0.00015403822,0.00017065395,0.0033877394,0.73600775,0.0016458415,0.24027349,0.01623114,0.0000902276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060852002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082859425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0112650115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003689658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010542085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059575796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}