{"meta":{"query_hash":"8157a53ea62d","filters":{"venue":"ASA Bulletin"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8157a53ea62d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=ASA+Bulletin"},"results":[{"id":"W1666818811","doi":"10.54648/asab2014025","title":"Denial of Justice under NAFTA Article 1105: A Review of 20 Years of Case Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"ASA Bulletin","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Law; Jurisprudence; Complaint; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03357796286553882,"score_gpt":0.29434605474963144,"score_spread":0.2607680918840926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1666818811","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003856835,0.99419314,0.00021322942,0.0018711981,0.00016354807,0.0000063084403,0.000010156106,0.0000043123664,0.0031524808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073391497,0.98941296,0.00046167546,0.0017135126,0.00036287672,0.000016631533,0.000035054905,0.000008234124,0.0006498645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945986,0.001433526,0.00070617336,0.0008257547,0.0021779488,0.00025793712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97358525,0.022078289,0.0016204815,0.00043087636,0.0020137813,0.00027138484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01158815,0.00087190804,0.0012841027,0.010401824,0.0018293791,0.0044904626,0.0020445464,0.005314645,0.0030743862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020951414,0.00093622215,0.0007790649,0.011141913,0.008148009,0.0076421294,0.0020749895,0.0045641745,0.0009909784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004283554,0.0001982954,0.0016525965,0.012148944,0.000077748366,0.0005167246,0.0029950454,0.00070031855,0.0003448052,0.19121413,0.04833574,0.7417728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068279996,0.000060041064,0.002647122,0.026193365,0.000047902107,0.0009732805,0.0015081171,0.00015040982,0.00025479723,0.018270599,0.9498424,0.000045106077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014081888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017666223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014081888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069234157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008322116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06128478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980235007","doi":"10.54648/asab2018027","title":"Is Kazakhstan a State Successor to the USSR? A Perspective from Investment Treaty Arbitration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASA Bulletin","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Arbitration; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Treaty; State (computer science); Successor cardinal; Convention; Plaintiff; Investment (military); International arbitration; Politics","score_opus":0.018113410846755905,"score_gpt":0.248167646597079,"score_spread":0.23005423575032308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980235007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3808375,0.016456425,0.0023775864,0.07425147,0.000949594,0.000019753901,0.00013684793,0.000048015285,0.52492285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882493,0.002484908,0.00017528188,0.0019631528,0.00014185895,0.000005009786,0.000029076784,0.0000060220377,0.006945351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987972,0.00047838167,0.000047038036,0.00015317784,0.000101857804,0.00042240132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.00012396318,0.00011399719,0.000029207375,0.000092791386,0.000073316914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011515658,0.00016264441,0.00033996103,0.0010279572,0.009173621,0.0108052865,0.0005276242,0.0019106932,0.0031695534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012487622,0.00015924622,0.0002713302,0.002219053,0.007604883,0.003946805,0.0025885787,0.0022677549,0.00041937458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025528747,0.000010929412,0.0017559931,0.00002655917,0.0000050919343,0.00047068007,0.006621231,0.0001338546,0.000111490735,0.98445255,0.0018029585,0.0045830784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058812355,0.00019146792,0.029137513,0.0004823779,0.00008238397,0.0018124077,0.06889504,0.0014280129,0.0008047075,0.373576,0.5234468,0.000084464424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056181956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04445297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056181956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006400578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054654917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11170989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124548222","doi":"10.54648/asab2016030","title":"Transparency Rules and the Mauritius Convention: A Favourable Haircut of the States Sovereignty in Investment Arbitration?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASA Bulletin","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Transparency (behavior); Arbitration; Treaty; Law; Obligation; Convention; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.00928981614579208,"score_gpt":0.19155820133369836,"score_spread":0.18226838518790628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124548222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12830181,0.008597798,0.03657207,0.1741721,0.0015533705,0.00011433678,0.000054237473,0.00006803662,0.6505662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97536474,0.001299591,0.0024876243,0.009069744,0.0005824737,0.00007654629,0.000011228855,0.000027453392,0.011080517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776292,0.011190746,0.00085356034,0.0019683563,0.0052472283,0.0031109056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98496544,0.009120675,0.0026889883,0.0015597781,0.0010019377,0.000663261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017194241,0.00037401752,0.00064470695,0.0010842254,0.0052263695,0.013848669,0.0014448466,0.0072167264,0.0055117514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039311934,0.00042926677,0.0011173689,0.0011861739,0.022783265,0.018611666,0.0064189057,0.0116410395,0.00050921354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007057336,0.0000042582674,0.0001563759,0.000008094555,0.0000030175836,0.00002480901,0.00080196926,0.00008788799,0.000051426297,0.99647164,0.00046002062,0.0019233784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035737,0.000054477037,0.00201223,0.00034122134,0.000024833911,0.000101653124,0.0019865644,0.0009951424,0.00057061587,0.9496428,0.04419504,0.0000396673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012665802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009908728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017194241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061489022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009617502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090932906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}