{"meta":{"query_hash":"c83ea7bf0091","filters":{"venue":"Accountability in Research"},"cohort_total":36,"direct_labels_cover":24,"predictions_cover":36,"exported":36,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c83ea7bf0091","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Accountability+in+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1557543835","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2012.650949","title":"Ethical Issues in the Translation of Social Neuroscience: A Policy Analysis of Current Guidelines for Public Dialogue in Human Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Knowledge translation; Thematic analysis; Strengths and weaknesses; Public policy; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Social research; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.8656019701839802,"score_gpt":0.6518773040487474,"score_spread":0.21372466613523278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557543835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03616394,0.007345348,0.038377192,0.88162816,0.0013611172,0.00044122408,0.00008848599,0.0001049135,0.034489773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8475783,0.0048409654,0.051866475,0.08878127,0.0013053827,0.0019454162,0.000103631566,0.00023782843,0.0033406434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4341127,0.43534717,0.03635063,0.012638146,0.06769338,0.013857935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.12938544,0.7894131,0.022476446,0.018097082,0.034531,0.006096941],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5252405,0.0007943571,0.0016282008,0.010045861,0.02129571,0.0420884,0.0056814286,0.028108802,0.0033033546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.597819,0.0014752159,0.0018547102,0.010723355,0.06914609,0.039024662,0.021354891,0.030243492,0.0006208745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003525842,0.00009692808,0.0024034816,0.00069578685,0.000024544821,0.00027886138,0.05747081,0.0005482611,0.0002611399,0.9048282,0.008243171,0.025113573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006770563,0.000103420854,0.0040057087,0.0066384054,0.00008136896,0.0003990419,0.09557198,0.003293487,0.0012539795,0.7780337,0.1103648,0.00018658751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011096952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012207271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040860143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11286648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58546305},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1588909286","doi":"10.1080/08989620590957175","title":"Haunted Manuscripts: Ghost Authorship in the Medical Literature","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Conflict of interest; Accountability; Psychology; Neutrality; Clinical trial; Public relations; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.8261096242099695,"score_gpt":0.7045818707680983,"score_spread":0.12152775344187117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588909286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046559308,0.12594484,0.09272956,0.4933234,0.057070088,0.00070268335,0.0005709428,0.001403165,0.18169601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6898985,0.049481727,0.06566536,0.10493912,0.03983549,0.00065471715,0.0004000605,0.00095464726,0.048170432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.862184,0.093474336,0.013283051,0.00486387,0.023327662,0.0028671336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4182138,0.40032807,0.08617184,0.049274124,0.035573337,0.010438878],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061197415,0.00093374343,0.0013988907,0.012160853,0.011477996,0.024697596,0.0039863177,0.013170419,0.013329957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40583163,0.0012824996,0.0013286631,0.009988638,0.037890583,0.030046858,0.01597287,0.009003901,0.004741699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031080685,0.000056541114,0.0052279118,0.0030112674,0.00010706834,0.0077692606,0.03090322,0.00041752437,0.00062682404,0.5943428,0.19444224,0.16278452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093436516,0.00015217357,0.0018616011,0.0064805066,0.00011266491,0.037558716,0.018182695,0.0012097247,0.0013037624,0.28836262,0.64445484,0.00022731496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090674154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001211149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00642399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011290943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32364672},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1969530644","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2011.584763","title":"Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors<i>In</i>the Past Really Errors<i>Of</i>the Past?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Remedial education; Informed consent; Embryonic stem cell; Human services; Business; Common Rule; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Biology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.2649465839690857,"score_gpt":0.4353178113501529,"score_spread":0.1703712273810672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969530644","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19357732,0.004958826,0.18739255,0.52774906,0.0032473586,0.003989953,0.0004917885,0.0011360531,0.077457115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7178027,0.0030150346,0.15809447,0.10318115,0.00082236883,0.0023209797,0.0003683867,0.00030788317,0.01408691],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.604636,0.21732213,0.06605518,0.013868806,0.08504303,0.013074919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28170568,0.4631139,0.09442381,0.06464322,0.08989721,0.0062161507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.39157975,0.0005773324,0.0012861486,0.0026695963,0.01196351,0.014168195,0.005339248,0.010300958,0.0030054557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5807334,0.0013807347,0.00082439964,0.0029639318,0.023750043,0.012397561,0.004576353,0.011703842,0.0017781518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048164543,0.0005571794,0.106674135,0.0019782907,0.00013810254,0.0057158433,0.23921423,0.001125326,0.02722563,0.24179493,0.09295941,0.28213534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022414456,0.0007631297,0.103533134,0.0066250474,0.00031652572,0.012740429,0.1646916,0.007833747,0.080095835,0.16050932,0.46118817,0.0014789867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076919675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08597033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98969907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017242689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075010724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7502905},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2013071091","doi":"10.1080/08989621003708451","title":"Dr. Cézanne and the Art of Re(peat)search: Competing Interests and Obligations in Clinical Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Narrative; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8296990260947004,"score_gpt":0.7185244154404423,"score_spread":0.11117461065425804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013071091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005230261,0.0080890665,0.0044957697,0.967748,0.0021871424,0.000041986943,0.0000042717975,0.000019088206,0.012184495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41335094,0.018115342,0.020530965,0.5258788,0.005443127,0.00045205117,0.000010655616,0.000118964934,0.016099118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8908362,0.09384471,0.002948401,0.0026251797,0.0073933303,0.0023521008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77003133,0.19754072,0.008274246,0.004550252,0.010212684,0.009390886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07122406,0.00039639187,0.00082248077,0.00147639,0.013495375,0.010274885,0.0018710588,0.020005316,0.0032240131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18832189,0.0005569463,0.0005894099,0.0012844665,0.03904085,0.013818766,0.0075300564,0.0249363,0.0006647422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010590094,0.00008619823,0.004579875,0.0006612986,0.000037109123,0.0094036,0.11132547,0.00038050528,0.0006778794,0.55643797,0.23106515,0.085239194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073217285,0.00014094898,0.0025050761,0.0031277768,0.000041159357,0.024343036,0.07509038,0.0011158198,0.0010359687,0.37217766,0.52008736,0.00026158988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063359486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01061039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97999465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006625312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018266117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37667334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026647402","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2013.866045","title":"Disclosure, Consent, and the Exercise of Patient Autonomy in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Content Analysis of the Conceptual Literature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Society of University Surgeons","keywords":"Informed consent; Autonomy; Psychology; Terminology; Ambiguity; Conceptual framework; Harm; Medicine; Social psychology; Alternative medicine; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7046772079286926,"score_gpt":0.6201766418666188,"score_spread":0.08450056606207379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026647402","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007738195,0.97987616,0.0038271497,0.0050959704,0.00023692148,0.0011395898,0.00022408609,0.000009874655,0.0018519706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11479044,0.8655766,0.013140497,0.0027229807,0.00013818266,0.00309246,0.0002830526,0.000018747882,0.00023694403],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8896347,0.07751532,0.019883346,0.002332188,0.009781685,0.0008527897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6780134,0.29239768,0.01709003,0.0032593647,0.008666655,0.00057283335],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08988412,0.0007969813,0.0027568843,0.015391674,0.0017351179,0.005085359,0.0015381419,0.0019203237,0.0015611955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20782419,0.000789501,0.002945901,0.017780447,0.006184719,0.008818208,0.00551315,0.0023775264,0.00016679682],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022103674,0.000040460454,0.004992404,0.54525423,0.0018334421,0.00031393656,0.041300733,0.00043879158,0.0004246733,0.03441899,0.0046482203,0.36611304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077910714,0.00008538436,0.0041775904,0.8985773,0.0041731144,0.0006467861,0.021792093,0.00031160953,0.00040762615,0.012283698,0.057379127,0.000087699176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004123126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00938662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99807966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008926583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035064444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4753583},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2034471287","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2011.542681","title":"Bad News about Bad News: The Disclosure of Risks to Insurability in Research Consent Processes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Insurability; Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Business; Business ethics; Quality of Life Research; Actuarial science; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Insurance policy; Medicine; Public health; Insurance law; General insurance; Computer science","score_opus":0.89119809906341,"score_gpt":0.692302295726708,"score_spread":0.19889580333670198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034471287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08246533,0.014599086,0.34717748,0.45374092,0.0028906593,0.0012972418,0.0001787996,0.0003550814,0.097295515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90464884,0.0036435775,0.04734039,0.03632851,0.002248696,0.0013110326,0.00004852817,0.00010221482,0.004328145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4936777,0.44521302,0.01951133,0.007501635,0.029988632,0.00410768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22201456,0.68502223,0.04721125,0.030914081,0.012154584,0.0026833478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30191183,0.0010989152,0.001283811,0.0025804783,0.010176082,0.015910536,0.0032217337,0.023502788,0.0037821142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5928289,0.0017269416,0.001375942,0.002210667,0.042255394,0.026634514,0.012274842,0.021313485,0.0009045476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005379052,0.00012447442,0.010686154,0.00083406596,0.00021353032,0.0037350056,0.107167795,0.0014152615,0.0010756765,0.76344985,0.010874859,0.09988548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018916615,0.00035987495,0.0043838625,0.004420007,0.0003038522,0.007357534,0.019418487,0.0059702974,0.0030566405,0.8739031,0.0803029,0.0003343836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019684096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017862975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97649723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008453673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013969885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035490430","doi":"10.1080/08989620902984106","title":"Safety First: Recognizing and Managing the Risks to Child Participants in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Focus (optics); Key (lock); Pediatric research; Magnetic resonance imaging; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.24041135265841806,"score_gpt":0.4912848617688953,"score_spread":0.25087350911047723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035490430","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040349532,0.012058341,0.23294066,0.6448244,0.005087047,0.0012948381,0.00014782586,0.00102229,0.06227515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5970574,0.012067024,0.25266477,0.11139072,0.0051846285,0.0028956404,0.00016363185,0.00045705537,0.018119141],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81145185,0.14173026,0.014078041,0.0035163315,0.026204478,0.0030190377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51236415,0.31460372,0.069945075,0.043580588,0.04344351,0.016062872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18194939,0.0009935583,0.0010399627,0.0023253781,0.00933195,0.00925073,0.0039006097,0.01180394,0.0059621907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39045134,0.0010369201,0.0013260659,0.0009999302,0.011563522,0.012947989,0.013720501,0.01306485,0.0023384364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047047404,0.00041756767,0.053264968,0.002905934,0.00023832393,0.0032246592,0.065098554,0.001327126,0.0047055054,0.1469736,0.1028669,0.6185065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018238813,0.0016109326,0.035660833,0.011151304,0.00039270587,0.015017568,0.037969146,0.003674837,0.015655039,0.28332165,0.5947106,0.00065298507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022178474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030352094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00529043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031472232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96225184},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2043925940","doi":"10.1080/08989620802388762","title":"Perspectives on Engaging the Public in the Ethics of Emerging Biotechnologies: From Salmon to Biobanks to Neuroethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Concordia University","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Neuroethics; Biobank; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Public engagement; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Neuroscience; Sociology; Biology; Bioinformatics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.5869436868712309,"score_gpt":0.5262730286507429,"score_spread":0.060670658220488005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043925940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009476946,0.00631753,0.008735253,0.92623067,0.001146283,0.000028698263,0.0000165025,0.000023064233,0.04802506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6941894,0.0102976635,0.008431304,0.26733574,0.0023759676,0.0003032077,0.00003169114,0.00011204913,0.01692299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9287151,0.056289498,0.0013487192,0.002830363,0.0056454176,0.005170941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9188658,0.06866511,0.0033133703,0.0017816438,0.0038029465,0.0035711478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07698872,0.0008614443,0.0014196127,0.0022737125,0.019486526,0.029977242,0.0036006318,0.046598427,0.0069251247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05637539,0.0009543642,0.0015398184,0.0028282446,0.09854375,0.03626554,0.026605882,0.033430684,0.0009725764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018900153,0.00002148308,0.00026090085,0.00012630799,0.000004551142,0.00036040868,0.036027074,0.00019867285,0.00016785946,0.95500636,0.0044898246,0.0033176276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024586616,0.000060348626,0.00031012992,0.0009219766,0.000011088114,0.00030846967,0.07466107,0.00039203014,0.00032329827,0.75125146,0.1716739,0.00006173728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007913616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008935231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07698872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01932632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024495782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4071601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046743472","doi":"10.1080/08989621003641165","title":"Disclosure of Unknown Harms in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Food and Drug Administration","keywords":"Magnetic resonance imaging; Research ethics; Medicine; Ethical issues; Modality (human–computer interaction); Informed consent; Institutional review board; Medical physics; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Radiology; Pathology; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.123535798155459,"score_gpt":0.4855899429385898,"score_spread":0.3620541447831308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046743472","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07003814,0.011280266,0.12432863,0.69078034,0.007549473,0.0035570667,0.00058087206,0.00062862167,0.09125655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60757273,0.01203873,0.113979034,0.21069208,0.010362092,0.007270818,0.00056613603,0.0003525401,0.037165824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.49357703,0.36049053,0.06708089,0.006236402,0.06638826,0.006226855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21437454,0.6145148,0.070312545,0.055608056,0.040055875,0.005134215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30349317,0.0008300585,0.0020545793,0.0038841846,0.009259427,0.008799984,0.0039586965,0.020830978,0.006769924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5448665,0.0016181676,0.0012186575,0.0030058387,0.009711842,0.01483571,0.00890682,0.017454535,0.002666819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007360897,0.00046059315,0.023886397,0.0037736571,0.0002922408,0.009726951,0.0636867,0.0012240341,0.007941721,0.33558264,0.23190393,0.32078493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000310218,0.0010830186,0.014506985,0.01121375,0.00034405163,0.016188297,0.02967624,0.0051905555,0.011957547,0.16500613,0.7439441,0.0005791011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011769319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001462839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059802905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019295242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85891694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065302798","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2012.692971","title":"Disciplining Bioethics: Towards a Standard of Methodological Rigor in Bioethics Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Discipline; Engineering ethics; Rigour; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Research ethics; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.920944469478084,"score_gpt":0.7754212306248044,"score_spread":0.14552323885327956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065302798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012468947,0.044451717,0.36111256,0.53810173,0.0043245354,0.0013212113,0.00015760849,0.00039245962,0.0376692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4395812,0.01261519,0.48529947,0.051273573,0.004431949,0.0036011322,0.00025204496,0.00039125484,0.002554204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.2482914,0.59074974,0.05503421,0.02094797,0.07928235,0.0056943404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15283664,0.60600156,0.037908953,0.11389156,0.07852997,0.0108313365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7238891,0.0020659852,0.007732201,0.015134323,0.0152342785,0.0566864,0.01382903,0.027869085,0.0020153949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.69598746,0.0027054315,0.0029882852,0.01132488,0.14643832,0.060920108,0.037014343,0.04124309,0.0015118532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009446794,0.00015533167,0.002578623,0.0022121454,0.00014625049,0.00010139968,0.025308535,0.00084627914,0.00052357535,0.9034627,0.0061898343,0.05838092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000701625,0.00010800208,0.0012497499,0.006438667,0.00005135333,0.00014209852,0.0049032243,0.0014431587,0.00058181514,0.95900244,0.02588206,0.00012723618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006964864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043841405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2761109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028276473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10201273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34049392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087645370","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2011.557302","title":"The Responsible Conduct of Bioethics Research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Bioethics; Government (linguistics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9759870882107871,"score_gpt":0.7668027338591651,"score_spread":0.20918435435162197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087645370","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016334457,0.017953418,0.15130812,0.6087217,0.007875516,0.00147087,0.000099021185,0.00021961708,0.19601732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7271278,0.013432584,0.13677749,0.08517122,0.007232889,0.0026752364,0.00015058691,0.0003438852,0.027088327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.42004573,0.44429582,0.029276807,0.019037073,0.076392494,0.01095217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4040169,0.41564068,0.038981866,0.070143946,0.05017602,0.021040574],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34737784,0.0009358306,0.0025072775,0.0043605417,0.014351053,0.031531487,0.0047234753,0.022659065,0.0023087887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43756798,0.0012805333,0.0014128152,0.0032515547,0.103805706,0.020341007,0.01749311,0.022616848,0.0017546563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023687866,0.000059897586,0.0013103946,0.0002801931,0.000050817267,0.00019618735,0.019384986,0.00034100914,0.00031349933,0.9377781,0.013041244,0.02721996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056296838,0.0000756725,0.0010087473,0.0018607962,0.00003251373,0.0003777874,0.005783475,0.0008203929,0.0006962311,0.8253971,0.1637927,0.000098366094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030030138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024542816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97734094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009322674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08380059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8047993},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2113503937","doi":"10.1080/08989620802689821","title":"Cost of the NSERC Science Grant Peer Review System Exceeds the Cost of Giving Every Qualified Researcher a Baseline Grant","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Baseline (sea); Grant writing; Promotion (chess); Grant funding; Government (linguistics); Political science; Work (physics); Business; Public relations; Library science; Engineering; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.4562942085277187,"score_gpt":0.46371875813006747,"score_spread":0.0074245496023487845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113503937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11465763,0.008495708,0.101269245,0.12192124,0.012351815,0.0052582463,0.0057598595,0.013104348,0.6171819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5837086,0.0056060604,0.09095371,0.012646314,0.0034613463,0.004032433,0.005802779,0.00084958284,0.29293916],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92790264,0.016069354,0.004414292,0.0034033866,0.043162186,0.005048148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80124843,0.05811723,0.018625114,0.0265016,0.06520881,0.030298762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032287333,0.00088549725,0.0018229904,0.00426805,0.00320382,0.0050934036,0.0026690608,0.0031210734,0.03802234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1223557,0.0007471015,0.0014624185,0.0036734985,0.002887797,0.0027423408,0.0049209087,0.0022029108,0.028006392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011494837,0.0006993491,0.0192391,0.0007975829,0.00028694206,0.00061537995,0.0008839534,0.003176167,0.009648974,0.060629874,0.28395087,0.6189223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077927427,0.0016205992,0.12247709,0.00045776734,0.00037063067,0.0040667346,0.0010288298,0.011653674,0.0056663947,0.01973296,0.8316831,0.0004629463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109579064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12838033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98741007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012589927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06319187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21788245},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2115882960","doi":"10.1080/08989620902855033","title":"Supervisor–Student Relations: Examining the Spectrum of Conflicts of Interest in Bioscience Laboratories","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Supervisor; Conflict of interest; Dual (grammatical number); Broad spectrum; Psychology; Spectrum (functional analysis); Graduate students; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Accounting; Business; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.8768308426194927,"score_gpt":0.6745009165671052,"score_spread":0.20232992605238753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115882960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631385,0.0022147046,0.004037699,0.01093697,0.0001261348,0.00013005896,0.000042143627,0.000015014781,0.019358795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982383,0.0003019243,0.00069367694,0.00047616466,0.000051338855,0.000041237097,0.000011747988,0.0000028636612,0.00018274515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9358468,0.040835228,0.004212384,0.0025300062,0.011287076,0.005288555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7662793,0.13046598,0.06230366,0.0046085618,0.0197634,0.016579144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06601043,0.0002776953,0.0005820581,0.007358542,0.008969096,0.00879855,0.0015660557,0.0024570357,0.002713625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15943891,0.00031417186,0.00046378886,0.003467252,0.00837467,0.0064195413,0.009463481,0.002515015,0.00020526412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028524845,0.00036978672,0.7611133,0.00027844502,0.000079875645,0.0008486431,0.14789675,0.00038337382,0.0008801706,0.020168921,0.0022262204,0.06546925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054785516,0.0003981019,0.5458313,0.00070330634,0.000048952075,0.0012701091,0.41484252,0.0021383835,0.00079487043,0.024394328,0.009434356,0.00008900254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041264016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009299995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047150673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008197294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3491007},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2155569949","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2012.638595","title":"Unfinished Business: Ongoing Ethical Exceptionalism in the Oversight of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Research ethics; Agency (philosophy); Human research; Political science; Honor; Funding Agency; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.3079548212433394,"score_gpt":0.47843168366478767,"score_spread":0.17047686242144827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155569949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030585835,0.007475942,0.007927977,0.8947447,0.0017895709,0.00014016242,0.00008837926,0.00006770924,0.05717972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6999929,0.0055170413,0.0085902875,0.26725325,0.0008794596,0.00014171832,0.00008440071,0.000089601934,0.017451432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8556446,0.035976615,0.0046124407,0.010431406,0.07130299,0.02203185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7843399,0.095118195,0.013826521,0.006516683,0.059582595,0.04061613],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.086304575,0.00050357025,0.0012430974,0.002454913,0.04574011,0.027948879,0.0064523625,0.014655265,0.0020758812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12384988,0.00108736,0.0010846588,0.0038077107,0.057756286,0.006694601,0.013270523,0.029824795,0.00022276313],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007142426,0.00005247444,0.007994231,0.00025133765,0.00007444996,0.001097882,0.03297622,0.001216595,0.00062145834,0.83819073,0.07867109,0.038782056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119582604,0.00007856064,0.016930612,0.0014502106,0.00014546103,0.0005651904,0.037448876,0.0035430514,0.0013858866,0.3194471,0.6184153,0.000470269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97205937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98072964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21413499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5928572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.911492},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2164540493","doi":"10.1080/08989620701670179","title":"Offering Results to Research Subjects: U.S. Institutional Review Board Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"IWK Health Centre; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Confidence interval; Institutional review board; Odds ratio; Odds; Medicine; Actuarial science; Psychology; Accounting; Medical education; Family medicine; Business; Internal medicine; Surgery; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.8055258204019985,"score_gpt":0.7221545411890221,"score_spread":0.08337127921297638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164540493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24239291,0.019140275,0.20110933,0.17057663,0.0100784395,0.05495633,0.005841273,0.0026209143,0.29328382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6454143,0.004232992,0.19530277,0.078701854,0.0034078485,0.04785939,0.004514651,0.00037312566,0.020193137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5511613,0.3147505,0.06030151,0.015546119,0.048608925,0.00963156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3240473,0.36103773,0.099570826,0.08758915,0.10514938,0.022605678],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4711454,0.0011285287,0.0018670816,0.005299396,0.0076425457,0.011599586,0.004716652,0.009965154,0.00947123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36101288,0.0023420658,0.001115918,0.0069857645,0.010473805,0.006312372,0.005406067,0.008598588,0.00492588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059881024,0.005913199,0.17699224,0.005631232,0.0008909071,0.0021562132,0.031119004,0.0021564271,0.017496606,0.2110257,0.23044045,0.3101899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002352241,0.0061088116,0.2424653,0.015097642,0.0012103132,0.005094231,0.018346764,0.008251494,0.01829823,0.03579151,0.64626855,0.00071485917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065004406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011298883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008120998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0764161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294826128","doi":"10.1080/08989620802388788","title":"Biomedical Research and the Commercialization Agenda: A Review of main Considerations for Neuroscience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Stem Cell Network","keywords":"Commercialization; Context (archaeology); Engineering ethics; Normative; Bioethics; Neuroscience; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.8127094389806951,"score_gpt":0.5201771416261698,"score_spread":0.29253229735452535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294826128","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000633767,0.99230874,0.00025078567,0.0040455656,0.0002913324,0.0000027514382,0.0000037961333,0.0000039356114,0.003029681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015061373,0.99549663,0.00043256622,0.001391727,0.00056078954,0.000008754392,0.0000062776876,0.0000034864868,0.0005936002],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957539,0.0014459207,0.00042065047,0.0003790963,0.001807456,0.00019291465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98734736,0.009933109,0.0007529774,0.00023492615,0.0014893385,0.00024231603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008934496,0.0012669753,0.002192996,0.009785613,0.0019634594,0.008599411,0.0014661289,0.006844166,0.0039941464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096843,0.00074945897,0.00080128835,0.014096181,0.007833758,0.014749331,0.002442162,0.005642941,0.0018871902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004242483,0.000077481134,0.00022687628,0.010309716,0.00004985978,0.0003593494,0.00075465953,0.00078550115,0.0004835192,0.3207476,0.050240062,0.6159229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012255032,0.000038577124,0.00056265644,0.0150042,0.000026265698,0.0006092647,0.0009218136,0.00023923026,0.00017059961,0.09429751,0.8880778,0.000039817787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048019416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007428274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006723502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048782706},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2583047471","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567","title":"Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Order (exchange); Engineering ethics; Declaration; Best practice; Accountability; Attribution; Confusion; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Management science; Sociology; Business; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.9220851009964572,"score_gpt":0.8041078746149898,"score_spread":0.11797722638146746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583047471","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017137012,0.0017632734,0.77893716,0.11262699,0.0063928342,0.008282172,0.00015701487,0.0028789851,0.07182456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06549814,0.0008957095,0.9120229,0.0063601756,0.0006245003,0.0033694229,0.00010458735,0.00039836654,0.010726135],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.39886358,0.42245296,0.067721196,0.020185743,0.084757045,0.0060194996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3275015,0.32076752,0.054124217,0.111902304,0.16844988,0.017254544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37407914,0.0021028917,0.001978161,0.014000901,0.018670917,0.023131873,0.007380008,0.012818745,0.0070227603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.521314,0.0028996924,0.0017406225,0.0070490413,0.026912704,0.02579167,0.019120986,0.016007675,0.011306572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023450957,0.00039427573,0.0068905917,0.002773173,0.00016634182,0.0010372141,0.08877509,0.002272952,0.0051929327,0.34160218,0.07867654,0.47198424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027258892,0.0003352426,0.00305891,0.007755282,0.00011074703,0.0016591416,0.034361895,0.007443484,0.010090038,0.45325175,0.48115432,0.000506647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037399228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0098402575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98718125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012023947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04839653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77187186},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2740628686","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2017.1362557","title":"The Inappropriate Use of Risk-Benefit Analysis in the Risk Assessment of Experimental Trauma-Focused Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.7439250363914514,"score_gpt":0.6797050059099999,"score_spread":0.06422003048145142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740628686","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017401723,0.01654457,0.86702603,0.06440959,0.0055313394,0.0057247807,0.00027581444,0.00053927174,0.022546846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37121144,0.0067472532,0.57641864,0.025233421,0.002441215,0.016008375,0.000075504926,0.00033105648,0.0015331405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.20228925,0.6987653,0.02857455,0.010523906,0.05872916,0.001117836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.112982206,0.80119044,0.027621863,0.04242985,0.014788087,0.00098756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.66086864,0.0032307904,0.0058282344,0.0083845435,0.0034027144,0.014424453,0.008049372,0.010731071,0.0045931004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.77766454,0.0027822147,0.0046698456,0.005787979,0.04071265,0.02442936,0.015006711,0.021516357,0.0011349331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012846468,0.0004369003,0.0038051012,0.008445965,0.00219971,0.0003352985,0.010883163,0.0037877916,0.00090646156,0.83830047,0.0074191494,0.12219535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038682803,0.0005235448,0.0013836446,0.004889268,0.0005490744,0.00031710867,0.0012177263,0.01305561,0.0014425376,0.9593784,0.016672347,0.0001838923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001402797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014402262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102155665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102573065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41820937},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2792860328","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2018.1442218","title":"Person-oriented research ethics: integrating relational and everyday ethics in research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Kids Brain Health Network; Institut de Recherche Clinique De Montréal","keywords":"Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Acknowledgement; Personhood; Sociology; Information ethics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9237284042116157,"score_gpt":0.7351510082954018,"score_spread":0.18857739591621392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792860328","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017651973,0.017972576,0.63471377,0.19725974,0.003661762,0.0022405013,0.00007055155,0.0002770843,0.12615211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5236788,0.014599025,0.4033562,0.041234013,0.0032445388,0.0057947873,0.00009220257,0.00027822008,0.00772221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.46793652,0.48627108,0.010905238,0.006335154,0.025113652,0.0034382907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6590814,0.26039767,0.018778205,0.030943291,0.020789558,0.010009875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29205218,0.0009526413,0.0020139185,0.0042130845,0.0086927675,0.026662208,0.003331754,0.009943819,0.0023519492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18276493,0.0011752807,0.0009699963,0.0059088585,0.09386284,0.028553665,0.021729974,0.015865793,0.00095200894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024083998,0.000047569087,0.00085486023,0.00063857826,0.000029793167,0.00021325248,0.07072846,0.00022166967,0.00028477857,0.89405817,0.0030296517,0.029869113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049877715,0.00017824407,0.0012041078,0.0032374668,0.000041339506,0.0010789045,0.035728734,0.00081433536,0.00057621964,0.78220916,0.17477737,0.000104174505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020088942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028937839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99005616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009303795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046941567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8730257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986767685","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2019.1684906","title":"Breaking barriers to ethical research: An analysis of the effectiveness of nonhuman animal research approval in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Research ethics; Protocol (science); Animal testing; Public trust; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Certification; Engineering ethics; Business; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.4771556329383189,"score_gpt":0.5741450469816433,"score_spread":0.09698941404332434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986767685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8834077,0.0050020465,0.004078107,0.026939081,0.0002061736,0.0017611425,0.0009569405,0.00010752868,0.07754136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927592,0.0011947611,0.0019089598,0.001714364,0.000013715245,0.00016957521,0.00016035335,0.000031962154,0.0020471527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7935962,0.059825957,0.01251904,0.0070325886,0.103082746,0.023943454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5326457,0.21314041,0.04881654,0.012801605,0.15878253,0.033813246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.097859755,0.00040583775,0.0009862906,0.006899426,0.020143779,0.011850987,0.004810216,0.0024295452,0.0026814332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3140518,0.0009078697,0.0010192115,0.012939588,0.01193847,0.0024231328,0.0076035806,0.00480353,0.00019689399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011971248,0.00045469467,0.61008066,0.002277249,0.0005577843,0.001749658,0.13612211,0.0021051895,0.0019356903,0.0554901,0.025288053,0.16274162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010133604,0.00026376147,0.830542,0.0016221849,0.00028814122,0.000328387,0.10093765,0.0033119766,0.0010566389,0.002880095,0.058401354,0.00026638823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99757046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23404768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38166147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88839614},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3002767658","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2020.1721288","title":"The norms of authorship credit: Challenging the definition of authorship in The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Medical Association; Dublin City University; European Commission","keywords":"Normative; Code of conduct; Research integrity; Medical journal; Code (set theory); Order (exchange); Scientific misconduct; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Public relations; Library science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Business","score_opus":0.7205593581249751,"score_gpt":0.5510722679019152,"score_spread":0.16948709022305986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002767658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020528976,0.006930726,0.21235725,0.62796056,0.007099788,0.00027528868,0.0001665302,0.0002321984,0.12444866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7465207,0.0036255827,0.15644677,0.07662753,0.0054888683,0.0014700731,0.00017638091,0.00039518814,0.009248974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4959629,0.36249784,0.03828018,0.016763045,0.077971786,0.008524264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32950887,0.49724126,0.029219178,0.055093624,0.078757785,0.010179319],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32505986,0.0010255533,0.002208662,0.0048941486,0.013550149,0.031032404,0.0056782155,0.025407722,0.0017210124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52708817,0.0013541592,0.0012530581,0.0061775716,0.11219617,0.030859828,0.014899063,0.026603187,0.000897006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012213182,0.0000073453275,0.00037853047,0.000043945343,0.0000043828254,0.000038802533,0.0055817007,0.00013088725,0.000033432334,0.98231065,0.0056163124,0.0058417926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040545972,0.000034143526,0.0009766311,0.0009857154,0.000014651695,0.00022249324,0.0040219817,0.001643001,0.00028117333,0.91437155,0.07728812,0.000120066856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015482665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014755937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97459227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020065365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049388606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83232135},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3122064493","doi":"10.1080/08989620801946917","title":"The Therapeutic Misconception: A Threat to Valid Parental Consent for Pediatric Neuroimaging Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Nova Scotia Health Authority; Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of California, Santa Cruz","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Informed consent; Research ethics; Neuroethics; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9007893159834213,"score_gpt":0.7061770508876674,"score_spread":0.1946122650957539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122064493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028661007,0.0064191893,0.06284054,0.8750044,0.0026139175,0.00038856769,0.000050239312,0.00012544404,0.023896536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6402788,0.004257668,0.039670702,0.30777228,0.0028265957,0.0012242948,0.00005153603,0.00013117034,0.0037868172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.42655674,0.47493276,0.02863597,0.0119685475,0.051200937,0.0067051463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3096853,0.5806032,0.0363082,0.041496325,0.023077976,0.008829021],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.39547408,0.00080302724,0.0016740119,0.0025262656,0.011439042,0.012740912,0.004949052,0.027494129,0.0019609223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49148643,0.0016681562,0.0017442178,0.0018921384,0.06477231,0.018913722,0.014246111,0.047030132,0.0009150076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013274293,0.0001243895,0.0062002456,0.00053362973,0.00009277676,0.0034645686,0.117231384,0.0005383656,0.0010605322,0.7454483,0.039819777,0.085353285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001552973,0.00032347927,0.0032092645,0.0053777085,0.00014349523,0.011504086,0.046848357,0.0027222182,0.0033701465,0.6704297,0.25549078,0.00042564142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023029856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026084846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97250587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088932505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033989754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7454881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175444759","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2021.1947810","title":"What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Sample size determination; Statistics; Psychology; Publication bias; Epistemology; Econometrics; Confidence interval; Philosophy; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.47990707220513623,"score_gpt":0.5656053467790647,"score_spread":0.08569827457392848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175444759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32814702,0.12662329,0.28054675,0.18187498,0.013599453,0.0061522326,0.009843905,0.0016254681,0.051586915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8815296,0.009561915,0.0896337,0.009349219,0.0038048676,0.002751012,0.001237173,0.00031721487,0.0018152613],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.36529472,0.48625004,0.067626595,0.013654585,0.06297746,0.0041965623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03160042,0.89256984,0.034239065,0.028642807,0.0120997485,0.0008480135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.53317285,0.0021379355,0.004755915,0.011262813,0.0024156002,0.0098281335,0.0042532175,0.00623879,0.006320992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9086965,0.0016713573,0.012241961,0.01401918,0.0072138235,0.015076537,0.00904395,0.0073784296,0.0010051683],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011747095,0.00044616824,0.15904768,0.032202605,0.043181356,0.0022442292,0.0071324822,0.02133079,0.0017388155,0.112557,0.030036747,0.57833505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038824487,0.0036813295,0.23625238,0.04123437,0.055994235,0.011617616,0.0045030923,0.06035526,0.0077768625,0.4802811,0.092854194,0.0015670616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025596956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031240864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066872896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005768081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57568103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293511218","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2119136","title":"Appropriate inclusion of adult research participants with intellectual disability: an in-depth review of guidelines and policy statements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual disability; Terminology; Inclusion (mineral); Documentation; Informed consent; Psychology; Research ethics; Medical model of disability; Population; Medical education; Applied psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8001993503299486,"score_gpt":0.7145235454461236,"score_spread":0.08567580488382498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293511218","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006670608,0.76929885,0.010012566,0.18364666,0.00577564,0.0022422783,0.0007938014,0.00015136729,0.021408206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040325563,0.8341898,0.055045046,0.06071507,0.0010919337,0.0041307984,0.000861184,0.00018292386,0.003457763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.81571823,0.10241279,0.04855775,0.0036827635,0.026440851,0.0031875921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5417408,0.34536842,0.033153243,0.0073309746,0.06876619,0.0036404273],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1915404,0.00083483726,0.0017058013,0.012879736,0.0036193288,0.005995869,0.004299872,0.005471259,0.0016199172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31240553,0.0014926987,0.0014511164,0.013468372,0.007223891,0.0071213413,0.005153471,0.007747519,0.0011449733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010624095,0.00016880357,0.002950827,0.07503456,0.00010164659,0.0007646884,0.029141134,0.00054405304,0.0014195958,0.07716148,0.1842733,0.6283336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028437526,0.000100441095,0.0029452648,0.27461487,0.00017277035,0.00085318356,0.011987235,0.00023052694,0.0008654172,0.011173712,0.6969246,0.00010340376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016477656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026281701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010965011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086071976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969746},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4308656581","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2145470","title":"“Researchers’ perceptions and awareness of predatory publishing: A survey”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Commission; Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Research ethics; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.6390324670345174,"score_gpt":0.5817224741848028,"score_spread":0.05730999284971461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308656581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99669266,0.00044665395,0.00012489135,0.0012488825,0.0000186423,0.00009271944,0.00021188582,0.0000055538308,0.0011582617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957041,0.0013084874,0.0005559868,0.0012357006,0.00004086922,0.00022070945,0.00019865188,0.0000048692577,0.00073054334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314463,0.0031948502,0.0013807518,0.00035726733,0.0013738323,0.0005485745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95893675,0.014250772,0.016936934,0.0013613576,0.0049691293,0.0035450961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012422843,0.00016964595,0.0005214511,0.0019137682,0.0013992145,0.001967679,0.00059992657,0.0013596648,0.0022305665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03361552,0.000567532,0.0007522621,0.0019410112,0.0011922915,0.0025917657,0.0018201779,0.0015152949,0.00061614654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013673231,0.00035518198,0.89472914,0.000762807,0.000092061455,0.0007224243,0.08366215,0.0000655221,0.0012123388,0.00024370106,0.0021382293,0.015879905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028260236,0.0011879131,0.73099315,0.00040451006,0.00007938335,0.001894911,0.25444767,0.00026637924,0.0005029806,0.000323243,0.00978057,0.00009098985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017534973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023565711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99864036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008351858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016597781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06569904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320710261","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2179919","title":"Can ChatGPT be trusted to provide reliable estimates?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Direct Anonymous Attestation; Computer security; Internet privacy; Computer science; Scientific misconduct; Trusted Computing; Medicine","score_opus":0.25348492229708014,"score_gpt":0.44915107833577544,"score_spread":0.1956661560386953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320710261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008023707,0.00048034493,0.00038605687,0.9887267,0.007869287,0.0000056016556,0.000022615073,0.000058680023,0.0023704986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003264136,0.00059402676,0.0008930986,0.97332644,0.011963552,0.00006124056,0.00003066366,0.00010828457,0.009758591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97859484,0.006590042,0.0018894314,0.00217747,0.00890747,0.0018407198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7957461,0.14372064,0.009435314,0.0075727287,0.02804636,0.015478828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029156439,0.00074409385,0.0011036389,0.00095701305,0.0075142286,0.009106311,0.0031193246,0.059551764,0.020907532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24768089,0.0008691972,0.0009289294,0.00094448816,0.0067201434,0.016184814,0.004636007,0.077876754,0.023158401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032829746,0.000012943783,0.00026394002,0.00003501447,0.0000048651855,0.00019509085,0.00026384764,0.00002967522,0.0000621224,0.012739507,0.97349584,0.012864306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003780995,0.00002917283,0.00037283398,0.00020727504,0.000010087726,0.0002681108,0.0004564147,0.0004398705,0.0002061948,0.019495917,0.97840834,0.000067864064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008015739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01405033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97084355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005532331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011635916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15419579},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4383186065","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2023.2233419","title":"Deploying an ethics needs assessment to inform a navigational tool for research compliance pathways at a provincial Canadian health authority","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Provincial Health Services Authority; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Variety (cybernetics); Health care; Compliance (psychology); Knowledge management; Business; Service (business); Public relations; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.9098084295788003,"score_gpt":0.7336634680487633,"score_spread":0.176144961530037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383186065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46637896,0.0010685037,0.24101916,0.077716045,0.0010746686,0.035617437,0.0045554913,0.01103585,0.16153388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4301191,0.00045261177,0.5439924,0.0019956108,0.0000864794,0.008556555,0.0012996552,0.00034080792,0.013156692],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.921686,0.049626302,0.0068905847,0.0031552122,0.01389386,0.004748008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76590514,0.10635638,0.0148367705,0.011342251,0.08275785,0.01880167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096585564,0.0009092436,0.00074348354,0.011626039,0.010787441,0.010366801,0.003624159,0.0017175252,0.0065755434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17772351,0.00097457756,0.0008670945,0.0043353885,0.0033355276,0.0060934885,0.007893997,0.0027041517,0.0017557114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053689705,0.0017296474,0.09334713,0.0017783248,0.00009019859,0.0018824503,0.122015454,0.004574841,0.005692678,0.022500725,0.10130513,0.6445466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064973155,0.0015160065,0.113127485,0.004685206,0.00023527183,0.001408642,0.21383725,0.05600798,0.016531212,0.038850643,0.5520049,0.0011457265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2556567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45023194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05088901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14719257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5107994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400620696","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2377723","title":"The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Misconduct; Exploratory research; China; Scientific misconduct; Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Criminology; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.2987618849254758,"score_gpt":0.5154437601731929,"score_spread":0.21668187524771715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400620696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993729,0.000065965425,0.00009007724,0.00014242635,0.0000020846996,0.000018731045,0.000036106103,0.0000015854039,0.0002702342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996897,0.0000489701,0.00008800381,0.000038704897,0.0000038380567,0.000014301895,0.000032128853,9.829871e-7,0.00008341462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912805,0.003412899,0.0015826662,0.00083062466,0.0016946068,0.0011988425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9405016,0.014375982,0.03353824,0.0028750412,0.0047345576,0.0039746594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010753804,0.00033559336,0.00051691534,0.0023970136,0.0024505183,0.0013836365,0.0008960983,0.00060879847,0.0014048772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02476261,0.0002929301,0.000527114,0.002811416,0.0022291,0.0012555383,0.0023953745,0.0010827886,0.00012443248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042088348,0.00007511291,0.98943347,0.000035982834,0.000036628833,0.00013783835,0.005422007,0.00007188518,0.00011555981,0.00010347953,0.0001215546,0.0044042845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031736843,0.0000492871,0.9937156,0.000021773103,0.00001305322,0.00008015337,0.0055444343,0.00022851388,0.00006229225,0.00006712935,0.00020556906,0.000009117483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02750282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04082843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00418688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006347502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05687225},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4402602478","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2398104","title":"Status of animal experimentation in nutrition and dietetic research: Policies of 100 leading journals and new approach methodologies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Research integrity; Management science; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.957616822100931,"score_gpt":0.7360190920615394,"score_spread":0.22159773003939165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402602478","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2780354,0.35490084,0.023099706,0.1544272,0.00992301,0.0045909444,0.028694732,0.0007850933,0.1455431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.658031,0.16302015,0.086057566,0.048353456,0.005977502,0.005142899,0.018407587,0.000674897,0.014334982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6685158,0.12970237,0.10572728,0.010881464,0.07873722,0.0064358553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16260676,0.5019403,0.12719749,0.039547086,0.15684032,0.011867972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.33546004,0.0005469287,0.001695984,0.035219893,0.0047555137,0.020827724,0.0031996153,0.0034926347,0.0047233696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46468434,0.0010080145,0.0012555867,0.05785665,0.007219167,0.007869399,0.006432435,0.002260628,0.0021866665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024536878,0.000323878,0.24029648,0.058238916,0.0007232262,0.0009952008,0.019046057,0.0006379936,0.0054949597,0.042632706,0.058644745,0.5705121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002378828,0.0005117602,0.23082137,0.043287363,0.00086684315,0.0013412522,0.023638673,0.0009316424,0.004519407,0.01280484,0.6806897,0.00034923456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006557993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009059608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99650735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009371668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03938955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4404044359","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2420812","title":"Allowing AI co–authors is a disregard for humanization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4544497266217594,"score_gpt":0.6545098781449135,"score_spread":0.20006015152315404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404044359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22992218,0.0034432064,0.12978137,0.19974239,0.0019308836,0.00026878653,0.000078628014,0.0004242976,0.4344083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983179,0.00026180272,0.004196178,0.006587189,0.00031030807,0.00014072281,0.000010556517,0.00005022012,0.0052639474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8962755,0.06688875,0.0044952007,0.009985729,0.017982597,0.004372365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6807034,0.16250427,0.05021883,0.06000168,0.026311427,0.020260457],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06221343,0.00039443516,0.0006016994,0.0012732998,0.00979984,0.01305157,0.0019856337,0.005530277,0.006172533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14984651,0.0005243044,0.00052962714,0.0009255925,0.05222745,0.011079551,0.010750284,0.0073049385,0.0016512469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009037536,0.00014550741,0.0110910935,0.00018939939,0.0000702549,0.00039167347,0.032663234,0.00041487746,0.0015986648,0.92023677,0.0069810436,0.026127199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006711609,0.00015648847,0.0044638896,0.0005664568,0.00006556604,0.0011795367,0.015094247,0.0013253655,0.0035445648,0.7905427,0.18290831,0.0000857132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011703639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012988873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004916726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009747862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32902002},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4406034614","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2449041","title":"Using mixed methods research to study research integrity: Current status, issues, and guidelines","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Current (fluid); Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Scientific misconduct; Research ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9748763335874832,"score_gpt":0.8580912241453093,"score_spread":0.1167851094421739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406034614","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001134048,0.7484497,0.10489273,0.12643729,0.0066333725,0.0046485234,0.00035717955,0.00034751394,0.007099683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047347598,0.53552246,0.3447633,0.037072554,0.005514441,0.027743153,0.00059598347,0.00043197384,0.0010085898],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.14747596,0.7294309,0.0704367,0.01324028,0.03770424,0.0017118582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.045304153,0.87032634,0.027895508,0.020592524,0.03362287,0.0022586938],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.70584154,0.0027030252,0.010896956,0.022987729,0.008389422,0.033762556,0.01207813,0.013386343,0.004690131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.79878354,0.0037582745,0.0062035816,0.027752155,0.034270916,0.028697293,0.017923042,0.017008694,0.002778613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002711885,0.00015620927,0.0044297087,0.2163994,0.001690988,0.00030375092,0.020329753,0.0007074358,0.0005300643,0.1416682,0.04068003,0.57283324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018520707,0.0001863573,0.0022359313,0.5816318,0.0012297692,0.0006615476,0.008227709,0.0018846501,0.00061762775,0.16612226,0.23677228,0.00024499357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087181395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01555221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98661363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02268849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08803035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36274981},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4406183280","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2450451","title":"Publisher and journal reciprocity for peer review: Not so much","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Publication; Incentive; Publishing; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Public relations; Revenue; Psychology; Political science; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.9255360272906197,"score_gpt":0.7014977101768047,"score_spread":0.22403831711381494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406183280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2888052,0.05182114,0.14503706,0.323015,0.011174405,0.0016244884,0.00078667543,0.00097642443,0.17675965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95286995,0.0046913014,0.021152698,0.011353372,0.0028687455,0.0006791884,0.00016526533,0.00034138325,0.005878133],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5925492,0.27905774,0.02945747,0.012196707,0.08090006,0.0058387453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27260664,0.4677305,0.10910234,0.057300974,0.075640075,0.017619444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26913768,0.00052158255,0.0015102208,0.0028740035,0.0055253385,0.014600124,0.0019686709,0.0031934434,0.009356717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6196021,0.0006914255,0.001192606,0.0032488913,0.0071097296,0.015356362,0.008751062,0.0044701793,0.0017696915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012105458,0.0003959361,0.24136014,0.008210961,0.0020866077,0.00079647667,0.04952587,0.00081324606,0.0031808307,0.109539896,0.07317012,0.5097094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005799938,0.0021950155,0.24439454,0.009339542,0.0020728242,0.0047105546,0.023735628,0.0042115245,0.006270649,0.16093375,0.54055995,0.000996044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024858331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047256663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7308623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056163226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015499135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9012834},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4408464518","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2470860","title":"Mapping nine decades of research integrity studies (1935–2024): A scientometric analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.45889575399146626,"score_gpt":0.6163961553527757,"score_spread":0.15750040136130944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408464518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7906626,0.062790684,0.009395709,0.011290915,0.0006641604,0.0007159944,0.06894974,0.00031324045,0.055217095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392976,0.020800894,0.006489511,0.00065203273,0.0006320001,0.0006560471,0.027807284,0.00014838921,0.0035162857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810284,0.0037663025,0.00419657,0.001842257,0.007979454,0.0011870045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8521641,0.06005882,0.037421536,0.009957867,0.036576934,0.0038207876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029420033,0.0004603456,0.0010599772,0.097039685,0.0022387784,0.00725117,0.0012011634,0.001168768,0.003950543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101812616,0.0003863191,0.0016024855,0.14952053,0.0020152817,0.007236264,0.0055830427,0.0013451915,0.001332357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040201607,0.00014035185,0.58181363,0.0074529075,0.0011157447,0.0009984627,0.022838328,0.0026410115,0.0009976889,0.027332222,0.03522958,0.319038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018251716,0.00015401158,0.7743363,0.0034310678,0.00033612282,0.0006731211,0.014112789,0.0019461066,0.0012525769,0.00536345,0.19827369,0.00010252223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017138178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013051926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006067466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009224789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15558988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413041880","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2542197","title":"AI disclosure, moral shame, and the punishment of honesty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Shame; Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Constructive; Perspective (graphical); Narrative; Social psychology; Process (computing); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10953065969817855,"score_gpt":0.4822537312601409,"score_spread":0.3727230715619624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413041880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4066893,0.02389607,0.07145685,0.31393284,0.0035757811,0.00023838572,0.00014168583,0.0002626861,0.17980643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98721594,0.0018074911,0.0034941542,0.005017991,0.00049434276,0.00006700456,0.000012948107,0.00002562894,0.0018644119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.80215997,0.16150035,0.007924731,0.0028991913,0.02323639,0.0022793459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48994294,0.35593477,0.10772008,0.022126524,0.019200863,0.00507483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07604525,0.00041301834,0.0005484189,0.0014071849,0.006361382,0.009190467,0.0014017446,0.004106798,0.0024465641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2906599,0.0003910668,0.0005689413,0.0014310176,0.029259011,0.008695694,0.007612585,0.0073512876,0.00049917045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041581594,0.0001788172,0.026243404,0.0023635325,0.00023386312,0.001710405,0.3856269,0.00079276616,0.00251291,0.46629333,0.01469744,0.09893073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014847166,0.00042188523,0.02399872,0.006595614,0.0002581226,0.0062610246,0.12817764,0.0037052417,0.0064731776,0.63791996,0.18566547,0.00037466822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074908586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008216133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046019363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008230367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40217054},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4414516464","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2560886","title":"A classroom exercise for improving mentor/mentee relationships","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Mentoring and Academic Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Physical activity; Component (thermodynamics); Research ethics","score_opus":0.24161579935727323,"score_gpt":0.4966661895393897,"score_spread":0.25505039018211645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414516464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6214434,0.0013819606,0.23024915,0.018036744,0.0019618145,0.006856711,0.00045069415,0.007821623,0.11179784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49519837,0.0010325761,0.46144807,0.0022893709,0.0008238544,0.003682954,0.00044648844,0.00031359144,0.03476472],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983444,0.00087042217,0.000085721724,0.00024227778,0.0002404428,0.00021680929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713457,0.0012397621,0.00021134996,0.00038402335,0.00021794438,0.0008122827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025546046,0.0012103474,0.00046023243,0.0010807944,0.0018511642,0.0009834999,0.0015168043,0.001519415,0.010804124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048767985,0.00024914273,0.000517183,0.000346864,0.0007880466,0.0013645971,0.003267036,0.0018783343,0.0029486036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005383889,0.026015922,0.0050434577,0.0008574119,0.00002809855,0.0006552667,0.011592239,0.0009177604,0.023265177,0.0026823024,0.03827539,0.8901287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032205158,0.034306042,0.10155071,0.0029008382,0.000389806,0.008244787,0.026715722,0.014167243,0.059611544,0.029319577,0.71919113,0.00038202995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002408846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008971466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010804124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004545728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011170141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036143363},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4417358357","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2600404","title":"Commercial funding of randomized controlled trials of weight-loss interventions using dietary supplements: A rapid review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Psychological intervention; Weight loss; MEDLINE; Clinical trial; Dietary supplement","score_opus":0.4723859013700117,"score_gpt":0.6036886997669948,"score_spread":0.1313027983969831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417358357","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011712805,0.9836481,0.0018068812,0.006611238,0.0014641635,0.0025944281,0.0013425892,0.000065712185,0.0012957695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034507684,0.93173605,0.014938472,0.005789463,0.0017549476,0.009275964,0.0012076352,0.000105534404,0.0006842766],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.70882016,0.13756905,0.09833068,0.007811281,0.045405544,0.0020632285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20598064,0.59450525,0.12550633,0.01098362,0.060961477,0.0020627584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22615612,0.0015877706,0.008427378,0.01935842,0.0012885389,0.008532168,0.003257671,0.005234063,0.008167794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58770597,0.0023844116,0.008800059,0.018200016,0.0028489043,0.0096136285,0.0039582993,0.0035199297,0.0013689129],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013568315,0.000045209687,0.0017797671,0.76164913,0.007854154,0.000118855096,0.00045466932,0.00015467413,0.00031663457,0.002136567,0.012813805,0.21131964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017579542,0.00039396662,0.005233727,0.88916874,0.021724788,0.00037445463,0.00029259946,0.00028778528,0.00047823053,0.002665731,0.077534474,0.000087544664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029577957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067056417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99476594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010616659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028617594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542873},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}