{"meta":{"query_hash":"4f6cb2e62854","filters":{"venue":"Acta Analytica"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4f6cb2e62854","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Acta+Analytica"},"results":[{"id":"W1563411169","doi":"10.1007/s12136-006-0002-5","title":"Hard- and soft-line responses to Pereboom’s four-case manipulation argument","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Causation; Compatibilism; Prima facie; Incompatibilism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Philosophy; Free will; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07100607043397107,"score_gpt":0.28307332140275915,"score_spread":0.2120672509687881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563411169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07696905,0.0003909759,0.08863391,0.084898375,0.0008567942,0.00024014986,0.000115778224,0.00024398841,0.74765104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503684,0.00013806376,0.012702551,0.0091400035,0.00026071363,0.00032221078,0.000042146923,0.00013574789,0.026890121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917048,0.0047132815,0.00025656098,0.0008779194,0.0018037615,0.0006436338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789627,0.016363585,0.0009615111,0.001862592,0.001429128,0.0004204581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076804664,0.00064889283,0.000601444,0.0016109424,0.003941919,0.003556828,0.001903135,0.009030801,0.018990567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046084005,0.00047012814,0.0006848404,0.0009548723,0.01425937,0.012629942,0.00525542,0.007249897,0.0015263807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083523024,0.000021112874,0.00011816336,0.000027210768,0.0000067336214,0.00016982842,0.0064708553,0.00009104688,0.00056864537,0.98257864,0.0052040126,0.00466024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009250075,0.000033081073,0.00044718524,0.00007677824,0.000019531559,0.00023794059,0.004725957,0.0021557761,0.0012174543,0.9389242,0.05203003,0.000039480612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008500966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069110934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018990567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026744963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008490094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06352979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969823214","doi":"10.1007/s12136-008-0028-y","title":"Normativity and Correctness: A Reply to Hattiangadi","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Meaning (existential); Hacker; Normative; Class (philosophy); Epistemology; Term (time); Function (biology); Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Algorithm; Computer security","score_opus":0.04628816405634182,"score_gpt":0.2309542078278165,"score_spread":0.1846660437714747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969823214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014298451,0.009856955,0.0013697508,0.9669749,0.005719825,0.0000062905356,0.000035957204,0.000027032444,0.014579337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17557563,0.012043952,0.0026925008,0.74436057,0.03395623,0.0001382955,0.000068527275,0.00032792895,0.030836344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947286,0.0024499635,0.00028227613,0.0010960295,0.0009865164,0.00045673578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797642,0.016304448,0.00059890206,0.0009537781,0.0019964392,0.0003822285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00898815,0.0008995612,0.002164707,0.0015368258,0.0071167205,0.0067773093,0.002134559,0.020032523,0.006603596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029039225,0.000758879,0.00079591194,0.002283315,0.026270434,0.019117571,0.0058725355,0.029480869,0.0028001186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006533106,0.000014121075,0.000124077,0.00007179033,0.00001514388,0.00007497333,0.0029333394,0.000114102295,0.00006296239,0.7012338,0.29158628,0.0037040415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092940456,0.000013061405,0.00034347415,0.00029263456,0.000021391621,0.00012074256,0.0019089598,0.0003728835,0.00031605555,0.6980438,0.29840332,0.00007075866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006737439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005574031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020032523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064876974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036289557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047534466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974457653","doi":"10.1007/s12136-010-0107-8","title":"Functional Reduction and Mental Causation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Causation; Supervenience; Eliminative materialism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Psychology","score_opus":0.019850838074956977,"score_gpt":0.2927407899772901,"score_spread":0.2728899519023331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974457653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117559776,0.0049991393,0.4009703,0.020622995,0.0008986544,0.00010378817,0.00033658135,0.0007568655,0.45375183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95241076,0.00077308354,0.027370423,0.00061969605,0.00043207372,0.00009693334,0.00016357604,0.0001527549,0.017980732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986737,0.00053854485,0.0000650424,0.0002881702,0.00029092547,0.00014372055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848384,0.00070981815,0.00008872536,0.0004328476,0.00021767122,0.000067119836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017093413,0.00060657616,0.00075736333,0.0019986976,0.0022176534,0.0025815265,0.0010771137,0.0016137433,0.010125354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035402605,0.00052874465,0.0013910857,0.00093373226,0.0111661265,0.0073620123,0.003082209,0.0030625928,0.00090961176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023542743,0.0000027524468,0.000045096625,0.000008435211,0.0000037735108,0.000012284718,0.00014896916,0.0000681526,0.00004791034,0.9980738,0.00025112732,0.0013353402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020140321,0.000001914044,0.00006243717,0.0000022166948,0.00000289837,0.00003071646,0.000037896538,0.00022198154,0.000039978044,0.998123,0.0014730879,0.0000018326502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013457738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008691715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010125354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014458114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008801398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033872724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985939438","doi":"10.1007/s12136-002-1008-2","title":"The slingshot argument and the correspondence theory of truth","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Substitution (logic); Truth condition; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02779545702844591,"score_gpt":0.273402059294556,"score_spread":0.2456066022661101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985939438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056459397,0.005252122,0.26448768,0.072483495,0.0013586942,0.00012136999,0.00032989957,0.0003620803,0.5991452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94546056,0.0011234973,0.028922211,0.0037509706,0.0014680373,0.00017128715,0.00013980742,0.00018992314,0.018773772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925062,0.004682587,0.00030978405,0.0009411598,0.0012046861,0.00035560227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98084396,0.0148297055,0.0007535844,0.0021956055,0.0010773591,0.00029985208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006125463,0.0005583272,0.0012820142,0.0030958639,0.0037144911,0.00591073,0.0017759071,0.0051293834,0.021188173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02929411,0.0007917341,0.001593554,0.0024312413,0.024818867,0.023502557,0.0051723537,0.006013703,0.0016800353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012685935,0.000004212908,0.00004626337,0.000019482462,0.000003822272,0.0000191793,0.00021393536,0.0000795653,0.000021972448,0.99769115,0.00065946614,0.0012283963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009760452,0.00000413312,0.000034057677,0.000010774758,0.0000037116981,0.00002336459,0.00008138835,0.00033202092,0.000045804885,0.99733007,0.0021223791,0.0000025092318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011351904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084731623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021188173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002946842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019957237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070881486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008113637","doi":"10.1007/s12136-014-0222-z","title":"Swinburne on Basing and Deviant Inferential Pathways","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Swinburne University of Technology","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Relation (database); Epistemology; Counterexample; Simple (philosophy); Subject (documents); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06145798561347454,"score_gpt":0.2461109013355658,"score_spread":0.18465291572209125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008113637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043282267,0.0069671804,0.56534904,0.09395682,0.0012202102,0.0002707662,0.00025980343,0.0003012419,0.28839278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8062468,0.0027783446,0.15356816,0.0059758206,0.0007703189,0.00047739936,0.00015519276,0.00042184038,0.02960604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831383,0.01041907,0.00072326773,0.002548412,0.0024740994,0.00069683796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95864075,0.02936291,0.00094764424,0.0069226515,0.0035368523,0.0005892514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020515313,0.0010691895,0.0015703219,0.0037624957,0.005668513,0.009248498,0.00327137,0.005893382,0.0073742187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059276678,0.00097272324,0.001488296,0.0020980511,0.05550924,0.020558538,0.008958307,0.0120167555,0.0011289637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070398246,0.0000044954522,0.000080826256,0.000017162143,0.0000062929876,0.000022931368,0.0008950684,0.00022417505,0.000025275627,0.9962853,0.00044651103,0.001984817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003558155,0.0000022642496,0.000021914395,0.000021088701,0.0000027443473,0.000009943202,0.00009909696,0.00037521892,0.0000606986,0.99654996,0.00285004,0.000003500219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057722256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047612716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020515313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004835629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043121916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10849661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011926612","doi":"10.1007/s12136-005-1012-4","title":"Reperforming and reforming Art as Performance: Responses","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Architectural engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.031409458959248904,"score_gpt":0.3086618108775677,"score_spread":0.2772523519183188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011926612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41272148,0.0013808042,0.002332624,0.08419856,0.00059513486,0.000093028364,0.00004881909,0.00002342971,0.49860606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98502314,0.00025169255,0.00019590602,0.0027034052,0.00011017581,0.000024077775,0.000010453439,0.0000140522925,0.011667105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99305236,0.0044776364,0.00015516648,0.00042429462,0.0007699857,0.0011206142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98512286,0.009807404,0.0012013629,0.00094549457,0.0016034045,0.0013194554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071814978,0.00037129605,0.00023687295,0.0011527395,0.008072451,0.009948857,0.0010998924,0.0072041317,0.009113151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021947557,0.00017854875,0.00037278427,0.0012837052,0.021515755,0.004793554,0.0069467123,0.005295336,0.0004409481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013861663,0.00030126952,0.008080326,0.00011392554,0.000013569455,0.0004888644,0.45168373,0.00019985878,0.00071281934,0.5042329,0.010104952,0.02392923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055041404,0.000082946615,0.014054096,0.00020499335,0.000018849883,0.00018085631,0.7731675,0.00030101743,0.00092854747,0.05901484,0.15196052,0.000030878167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00710258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011566886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009948857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004917426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042877053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03797984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012755080","doi":"10.1007/s12136-003-1019-7","title":"Searle freed of every flaw","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Interpretation (philosophy); Extension (predicate logic); Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Philosophy; Comprehension; Linguistics; Remainder; Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.013245086076460692,"score_gpt":0.22890325118540505,"score_spread":0.21565816510894437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012755080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015364586,0.01079069,0.3102606,0.2749588,0.008166425,0.00011626494,0.00050152285,0.0023560375,0.37748516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4839735,0.008219265,0.18243024,0.045280635,0.0032913235,0.00026390393,0.0005456979,0.0020270124,0.27396846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647385,0.0011318069,0.00023711307,0.0008681519,0.0010657705,0.0002233327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98912746,0.003784996,0.0002684563,0.0038889204,0.0025893517,0.0003407869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006014641,0.0008911412,0.0014520363,0.0019950506,0.0033581038,0.0051506846,0.0017871726,0.0043373443,0.01642139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034588214,0.0007212263,0.0009675956,0.0008269819,0.012012878,0.016914247,0.0046908013,0.008415937,0.0070891446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038067014,0.00001723802,0.00025020458,0.000068659036,0.000029481005,0.00005961419,0.00075271557,0.00036389034,0.00017109136,0.9441575,0.030234031,0.02385754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020666208,0.000014290417,0.00012031609,0.000100891484,0.000020279771,0.00013661217,0.00023342842,0.00089158484,0.00049690943,0.8461866,0.15176113,0.000017289065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026254961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003856424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01642139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016551961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002607201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05493498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922599164","doi":"10.1007/s12136-019-00383-3","title":"A Puzzle About Knowledge, Blame, and Coherence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Cegep Edouard Montpetit","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Deontic logic; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Belief revision; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03447358632831219,"score_gpt":0.2694467857178974,"score_spread":0.2349731993895852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922599164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08275637,0.013400559,0.107069544,0.5615536,0.0012639799,0.00007332186,0.000246964,0.0001885562,0.23344712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731242,0.0014352546,0.012492533,0.0072705415,0.0007120984,0.000084172054,0.00006394641,0.00013786687,0.004679489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302644,0.011038725,0.0007022411,0.0021663262,0.0022996084,0.000766497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337676,0.05015248,0.0030342382,0.007821916,0.0040627075,0.0011610754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021708393,0.00061578956,0.0016864246,0.0025693474,0.01004349,0.013151661,0.002905443,0.00989534,0.006919359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06758621,0.0009839119,0.0008250904,0.0022619867,0.11069505,0.04206891,0.007452964,0.012888505,0.0009706874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016214111,0.000011322966,0.00019404094,0.000037580412,0.000010208874,0.000026623911,0.00665435,0.00015638134,0.00003680858,0.9876752,0.0018250613,0.0033562316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008067032,0.000002785513,0.000078153724,0.00004914984,0.0000030296756,0.000018174223,0.001890965,0.00017015343,0.000031801017,0.9933258,0.004415025,0.0000068734457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065586264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004461951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021708393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058138655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00838251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114806354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003795260","doi":"10.1007/s12136-020-00423-3","title":"Why Physicalism Seems to Be (and Is) Incompatible with Intentionality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Contradiction; Intentionality; Epistemology; Intuition; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.026189889600909955,"score_gpt":0.2661143349038871,"score_spread":0.23992444530297713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003795260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15231363,0.0044088825,0.08292232,0.2296678,0.0020955098,0.000066451845,0.0003837392,0.00038564732,0.52775604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98346484,0.0005852601,0.0042902934,0.004726696,0.00037347066,0.000039586463,0.00007920468,0.00012045823,0.006320191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959992,0.001512148,0.00018152483,0.0008289262,0.0008648477,0.0006133402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125516,0.004285649,0.0007205068,0.0016478054,0.0014310033,0.000659886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005323013,0.00032450794,0.0008199395,0.001074561,0.0033111635,0.0055163377,0.0010869892,0.0042283195,0.0072163474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015143083,0.00046091707,0.00093960675,0.00070117804,0.027150158,0.014078253,0.0039164936,0.0055177766,0.0013394802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001189916,0.0000049090077,0.00018111146,0.000020322334,0.0000054006505,0.000033874512,0.00064818404,0.00004632729,0.0000882124,0.99690825,0.0010025259,0.0010490348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068751106,0.0000031159154,0.00014762586,0.000012005349,0.0000024061196,0.00004964608,0.00030901466,0.00009162619,0.000058840804,0.99476767,0.0045457208,0.0000054361713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030892498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017708931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072163474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001851433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020972886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028151095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101031851","doi":"10.1007/s12136-020-00453-x","title":"Individually Sufficient and Disjunctively Necessary Conditions for Moral Responsibility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Ascription; Moral dilemma; Moral responsibility; Counterexample; Epistemology; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08254847560788647,"score_gpt":0.29841171493878155,"score_spread":0.21586323933089507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101031851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13955066,0.0011292755,0.30414748,0.016049892,0.00057339366,0.00035074222,0.0015257358,0.0006698289,0.536003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424025,0.0003789311,0.04506741,0.0010460546,0.00027164348,0.00055786996,0.00057958066,0.00014061344,0.009555311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937702,0.001472987,0.0006760252,0.0015321748,0.001463985,0.0010846731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98041385,0.0118007995,0.001456542,0.0025437986,0.002588386,0.0011966989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050769798,0.00085194013,0.0017290275,0.002054766,0.003538685,0.0037347511,0.0016228883,0.004735254,0.016522875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022523152,0.0016102828,0.002565751,0.00091892044,0.011066063,0.0103353495,0.0048000664,0.0070083034,0.0024886027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052436,0.00004418452,0.00034392322,0.00006195741,0.000023107017,0.000115573435,0.00044826002,0.00032900833,0.00076086156,0.9944535,0.0011992856,0.0021678866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036233123,0.000017060414,0.00036019072,0.000019543602,0.0000119922415,0.00014547505,0.00020813412,0.0006435608,0.00059621333,0.9959347,0.0020148393,0.0000119434035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071949355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012950704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016522875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002325635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025894814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055274546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223928189","doi":"10.1007/s12136-022-00518-z","title":"Musical Types and Musical Flexibility","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Musical; Musical form; Flexibility (engineering); Security token; Computer science; New Interfaces for Musical Expression; Musical composition; Speech recognition; Art; Visual arts; Mathematics","score_opus":0.057729731593130156,"score_gpt":0.308653309475516,"score_spread":0.25092357788238584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223928189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.935994,0.00109014,0.0045002834,0.00058329594,0.00005527522,0.000009254364,0.00013604689,0.000030192807,0.057601485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822575,0.00014591542,0.00043303,0.000024979163,0.00002010824,0.0000029272069,0.000029492101,0.0000069286416,0.0011108873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997378,0.00006015844,0.000018778243,0.00005550487,0.00008984951,0.000037866448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890935,0.00047186096,0.00024021891,0.00016644667,0.000081191996,0.00013094099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005111792,0.00023231684,0.00020082523,0.00096603465,0.00035925425,0.0028440533,0.00037175402,0.0004036508,0.0074083772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037271972,0.00016967798,0.00020513301,0.0007570476,0.0014430899,0.0017873003,0.0012218207,0.00055020396,0.00044945296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00398136,0.00030447514,0.24536403,0.00040273703,0.00047981716,0.002401414,0.011589562,0.004709212,0.13319153,0.30456737,0.0017542718,0.29125425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101570666,0.00022591815,0.6540433,0.000061506275,0.00014220561,0.002135485,0.0056293556,0.0033358396,0.003887878,0.32402107,0.006335765,0.000079960155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050677964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006389265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074083772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024716405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014856114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024783492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362667518","doi":"10.1007/s12136-023-00552-5","title":"Avoiding Strawson’s Crude Opposition: How to Straddle the Participant and Objective Stances","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Straddle; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Financial economics; Law","score_opus":0.09403509018748318,"score_gpt":0.34936240746417485,"score_spread":0.25532731727669167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362667518","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013406693,0.0028437772,0.4702037,0.2744725,0.011783892,0.00021484306,0.00014551073,0.00097253884,0.22595654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62428397,0.0016185875,0.2579222,0.057554066,0.0042192787,0.0010344605,0.00013772314,0.0020527588,0.05117697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97389096,0.016192883,0.0010452055,0.0027936252,0.0050583226,0.0010190007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96551806,0.018155038,0.0015110184,0.0070131137,0.0064410227,0.0013617147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02822586,0.0014462672,0.0024770624,0.0031615382,0.008484705,0.0096212,0.0042426544,0.009457024,0.012503868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10665009,0.0013514902,0.0012383325,0.0018381928,0.0412324,0.030474992,0.010885999,0.023925817,0.00546424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046254045,0.00001710269,0.00017033699,0.000055013483,0.00002305498,0.000056151464,0.003390946,0.000121068515,0.00014306146,0.96522784,0.017202334,0.013546856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040047973,0.00001217374,0.0000960722,0.00011540654,0.000018578128,0.00006963992,0.0012611334,0.0008179746,0.00022251836,0.9530195,0.044292044,0.000034960925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039978945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066493875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02822586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035117753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048930454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14927435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387378241","doi":"10.1007/s12136-023-00568-x","title":"Qualification in Philosophy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09026420537033795,"score_gpt":0.2789578433595187,"score_spread":0.1886936379891807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387378241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010569235,0.024700562,0.025571031,0.063120306,0.003214995,0.000045272456,0.000207887,0.000085881555,0.87248486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65138537,0.01040538,0.0075994316,0.01072952,0.0068505732,0.00019683209,0.00021745043,0.000197003,0.31241843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982003,0.0009862344,0.00007425043,0.00028065385,0.00027736853,0.00018113395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740344,0.001575174,0.0001166544,0.00030180844,0.00045220353,0.00015069492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002798077,0.0005431191,0.0011793891,0.0015625502,0.0062918575,0.005008604,0.0010138921,0.0036497063,0.017355135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053342315,0.0004781206,0.0005929586,0.0019218946,0.020637572,0.009009225,0.0028090524,0.00781258,0.0030163042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020188859,0.0000022772772,0.000020407611,0.000010129948,7.7463835e-7,0.0000053129165,0.00025109778,0.000018268334,0.000007731059,0.99541193,0.0033535354,0.00091651134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058959304,0.0000048585907,0.00007487983,0.000020494837,0.0000018150346,0.000019277479,0.00015533819,0.00008581772,0.000014125673,0.9620632,0.037552234,0.0000021839232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056223287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036994165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017355135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050572385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028044959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05805874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402723411","doi":"10.1007/s12136-024-00610-6","title":"Moral Generalizations and Moral Explanatory Pluralism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Moral reasoning; Moral psychology; Moral disengagement; Epistemology; Moral authority; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06625176405727032,"score_gpt":0.24504535838154684,"score_spread":0.17879359432427652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402723411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17578185,0.0055746767,0.24986956,0.15437989,0.0011780321,0.00014219282,0.0003145239,0.0003505273,0.41240874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858096,0.00037041894,0.009069391,0.0016733862,0.00032289277,0.00005042667,0.000056647536,0.000029940564,0.0026172206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854703,0.00949075,0.00050506304,0.0013716996,0.0022866086,0.0008756051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692607,0.019378714,0.0027875437,0.0048873387,0.002859593,0.0008261519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021553723,0.00048705025,0.00085731765,0.002902022,0.0035644225,0.0063316994,0.0021784832,0.0046764193,0.0053326404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025434872,0.00053913187,0.001023687,0.0019629989,0.044000786,0.011422248,0.006701917,0.0076508173,0.00040444176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042886386,0.000005698214,0.00012538966,0.000015258071,0.000004728353,0.00002809155,0.0009823493,0.00023712793,0.000021671207,0.99735874,0.00034825812,0.0008684771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048183892,0.0000022112388,0.000108184126,0.00003435372,0.000003926988,0.000017198654,0.00037627664,0.0006468905,0.000035129175,0.9950701,0.0036968933,0.0000039876654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015297002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015778743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021553723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005210821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027143052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11398834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406108491","doi":"10.1007/s12136-024-00621-3","title":"The Morality and Aesthetics of Personal Beauty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Analytica","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Beauty; Aesthetics; Value (mathematics); Aesthetic value; Morality; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Art; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.06223872418934633,"score_gpt":0.3028486354213839,"score_spread":0.24060991123203757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406108491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22739412,0.004372232,0.022315381,0.013463708,0.000510044,0.00002381139,0.000048782375,0.000044104294,0.7318279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932448,0.00059165544,0.0020931643,0.0002644856,0.00011114449,0.00000838156,0.000011702406,0.000021389129,0.0036532723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986382,0.0006293573,0.000028578406,0.000089489164,0.00052098784,0.00009341553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997413,0.0011949503,0.00035512348,0.00027739618,0.00050613924,0.0002533905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017070351,0.00020280298,0.00016867623,0.001090314,0.0013797639,0.004624529,0.0005486345,0.001105723,0.005686414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008418716,0.00020772024,0.00020542661,0.0005996587,0.014489008,0.0027431299,0.0012450211,0.0019958378,0.0002919462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007375576,0.000047780235,0.002223925,0.00010984325,0.000026292832,0.00018295489,0.008120495,0.00045943452,0.0024455283,0.95060164,0.002582384,0.03312607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024417854,0.000042995773,0.015000553,0.00008481543,0.000021412818,0.000786931,0.0062404037,0.0011390129,0.00086510536,0.94984084,0.025923127,0.000030353493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010790759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014866777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005686414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012837467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007059479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019022882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}