{"meta":{"query_hash":"d6f7e07d6143","filters":{"venue":"Acta Politica"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d6f7e07d6143","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Acta+Politica"},"results":[{"id":"W1970340122","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.18","title":"Does the government agreement’s grip on policy fade over time? An analysis of policy drift in Belgium","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Comparative politics; Public policy; Divergence (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Policy studies; Political science; Policy analysis; Public economics; Economics; Political economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.010254049585489625,"score_gpt":0.31735346253745006,"score_spread":0.3070994129519604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970340122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70242107,0.0000035744224,0.000013843247,0.029801892,0.000065905515,0.00018201969,0.00008867762,0.000033773165,0.26738927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925361,0.000022364182,0.000012603242,0.0036041853,0.0008406596,0.000010553331,0.000006285889,0.000012698881,0.0029545184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972787,0.00063815253,0.00029986227,0.00026223256,0.00077500107,0.0007460487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849904,0.0007229166,0.00007195756,0.00044690166,0.000026602918,0.00023258716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008778512,0.00015564704,0.00030226083,0.0003283107,0.0002720006,0.00006148431,0.0005185937,0.00009995093,0.0004605553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010975909,0.00009525023,0.00016661412,0.0010531562,0.00033892138,0.00015498138,0.00004479156,0.00019815161,0.000028999779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027685828,0.00023232409,0.029681342,0.000009676992,0.00024734213,8.779397e-7,0.030363489,0.000101970894,0.00082702405,0.93559885,0.0003044801,0.0026049218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047317977,0.00017138309,0.8934785,0.0000252577,0.00027334524,1.4183959e-7,0.0030216884,0.00083580095,0.0005961178,0.0067918203,0.09403937,0.00029337336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14416406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012634953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041356598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000242895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.861535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982530905","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500135","title":"Explaining the Rise of the LPF: Issues, Discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Politics; Comparative politics; Voting; National election; Political science; Political economy; Novelty; Government (linguistics); Survey data collection; Panel data; Endogeneity; Primary election; Feeling; Panel survey; Split-ticket voting; General election; Law; Sociology; Economics; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.026988249617243047,"score_gpt":0.31954022226106593,"score_spread":0.2925519726438229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982530905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8037206,0.0005850395,0.0000124766375,0.10903177,0.00029000238,0.00047917382,0.000008279502,0.000028406394,0.085844256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920046,0.0000106056905,0.0000036920896,0.00026582854,0.00053424557,0.000025566931,4.9568956e-7,0.0000054406646,0.007149579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.0005272244,0.00020218485,0.00009337066,0.00023826196,0.00034412617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991821,0.0004579766,0.00007771462,0.00017537114,0.000059410497,0.00004743032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006751892,0.0000661416,0.00010905088,0.00001190551,0.0006734441,0.00006913689,0.00016675344,0.000062404186,0.00007361165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038224482,0.000029544275,0.000056430934,0.00015136875,0.0007770301,0.000093852366,0.00002985788,0.00013737667,0.000007920634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008651941,0.000014682319,0.007061842,0.0000045161155,0.000007740935,9.510593e-8,0.0022089835,7.725793e-7,0.00020357707,0.9851737,0.005171691,0.00014371645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011769544,0.00008901018,0.2560088,0.00010068676,0.00018182863,0.0000059586637,0.0067795715,0.00050695176,0.0029179277,0.163964,0.56795174,0.00031657537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14364043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8212097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040067716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047912516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86206216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005694448","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.13","title":"Economic crisis, party competence and the economic vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Competence (human resources); Political science; Political economy; Economics; Positive economics; Law; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.020337137545077294,"score_gpt":0.30791351601020717,"score_spread":0.28757637846512984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005694448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84726477,0.0000463021,0.0000329738,0.06603294,0.00046850898,0.00024651442,0.00001438459,0.00005963434,0.08583399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974792,0.000009971294,0.000017389912,0.0012815987,0.00070791744,0.00001726648,0.0000016340498,0.000006346541,0.00047867972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877495,0.0003666053,0.00019358455,0.00015654469,0.00007279841,0.00043552148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998936,0.00061514956,0.00005073534,0.00017626573,0.000014647441,0.00020718375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075581664,0.00007680936,0.00016129363,0.00001684937,0.00038585844,0.000118754484,0.00015418905,0.000055647713,0.00011684515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001435985,0.000055518824,0.000042823453,0.000018028479,0.00053804397,0.00013575965,0.000029753397,0.000073861265,0.00022877198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053573676,0.000002485928,0.002687691,0.0000032727692,0.0000061813857,6.125021e-8,0.00048744938,0.0000025528504,0.000006971496,0.9933615,0.0033375998,0.00009892918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009903925,0.00007068569,0.036322646,0.000017191856,0.000057515867,0.0000026989187,0.0006424439,0.0028453695,0.00013958564,0.2736555,0.6849212,0.00033479172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0750599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017125284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71970594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015038384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012036167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9556311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010952825","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500081","title":"The Roots of Social Capital: Attitudinal and Network Mechanisms in the Relation between Youth and Adult Indicators of Social Capital","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Socialization; Social psychology; Social reproduction; Political socialization; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Structural equation modeling; Positive economics; Psychology; Politics; Political science; Economics; Social science; American political science","score_opus":0.014888809041827723,"score_gpt":0.27453706523729604,"score_spread":0.25964825619546833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010952825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99140877,0.00015833222,0.000008602675,0.004316615,0.000099524965,0.00023234013,0.000029796025,0.00001358302,0.003732423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900585,0.000058424408,0.00002104507,0.000093431576,0.0007734772,0.000008306532,0.000010457995,0.000009621333,0.000019399842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998448,0.00025322312,0.00028958105,0.00015781981,0.0004073624,0.00044399814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927086,0.00034867236,0.00018070888,0.00007089757,0.000059542712,0.00006932392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077976944,0.000113489565,0.00022476014,0.000042765256,0.0009919379,0.00004694576,0.00021441632,0.00020864356,0.0000068008967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013553718,0.00008198793,0.00006687951,0.00031285651,0.0010816426,0.00013294534,0.00006699538,0.00022822514,9.586354e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012946884,0.000020529636,0.006684063,0.0000063641473,0.000024299834,5.401348e-7,0.22909759,4.2485956e-7,0.0000069822645,0.7636799,0.000054599663,0.00041173538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037609358,0.00007886075,0.6876581,0.000013851511,0.00006638896,3.8003964e-7,0.10190135,5.467915e-7,0.00001774722,0.20965274,0.0001242834,0.000109670174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002820776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018244039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.680974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006870731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012745486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7629284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017415040","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.32","title":"Between populist rhetoric and pragmatic policymaking: The normalization of migration as an electoral issue in German politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Normalization (sociology); German; Rhetoric; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Political rhetoric; Sociology; Social science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018972318088298332,"score_gpt":0.3572644570991883,"score_spread":0.33829213901088995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017415040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98522913,0.00001089586,0.000028453793,0.004540597,0.00011016699,0.0002542525,0.0000122945785,0.000037876067,0.009776299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820024,0.0000064803053,0.00007850009,0.00056093576,0.0006390611,0.000008715154,0.000040463758,0.000015916676,0.00044971178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801135,0.00052570034,0.0003535054,0.00018484163,0.00040422514,0.00052035606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910283,0.00022041674,0.0001612572,0.0002625684,0.000079429316,0.00017346894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007046485,0.00012576414,0.00019798755,0.00014606385,0.0003530388,0.00009289446,0.0002821723,0.00011139544,0.000033209202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006737908,0.00010461533,0.000027461041,0.00030780048,0.000256613,0.000406732,0.00004140424,0.000116399955,0.0000101559945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028595227,0.00006203346,0.1395239,0.000036844718,0.000012461979,5.0145803e-7,0.019654332,0.0000011959341,0.00024498446,0.83983165,0.0003337321,0.00029548412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062655914,0.0002674528,0.7098248,0.00009830309,0.00009359281,0.000002558366,0.0013383188,0.00047760952,0.0010594747,0.1427148,0.14305443,0.00044210945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05929481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014196217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69711685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017418983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014147555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94696945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018278896","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500079","title":"Accounting for the Age Gap in Turnout","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Cynicism; Closeness; Demographic economics; Comparative politics; Politics; Voter turnout; Political science; Race (biology); Demography; Sociology; Voting; Economics; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.07300765249417925,"score_gpt":0.37975949876415005,"score_spread":0.3067518462699708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018278896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87215537,0.000078036224,0.00019219946,0.06293139,0.00045895018,0.00075485,0.000010484918,0.000069051166,0.0633497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760497,0.0000020504976,0.000048317313,0.0009908,0.0006215915,0.000057954207,0.0000017826123,0.000006800305,0.000665714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989928,0.000052861255,0.00015651075,0.0000987469,0.00015237245,0.00054668105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999268,0.0004871271,0.00002676179,0.00010651269,0.000039670245,0.00007194045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049378653,0.000054749493,0.00008539719,0.000025520356,0.00029626695,0.000081905826,0.00014424944,0.000059849306,0.000032336055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074947736,0.000039828134,0.00004311159,0.00012237298,0.00013350394,0.000120218894,0.000012281232,0.00007658149,0.00002923559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027835167,0.000019506779,0.0033581937,0.000008096836,0.0000036057422,0.0000011167976,0.0026059297,0.0000069235043,0.00015099725,0.99330646,0.00038172895,0.00015465202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001013734,0.00009201775,0.122090474,0.00011086938,0.000041120016,0.0000013521956,0.0023983568,0.00007003817,0.00061790686,0.51058346,0.36261934,0.0003613161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04823665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018545186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.482723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016251634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013766608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022168360","doi":"10.1057/ap.2008.43","title":"Women for women's sake: Assessing symbolic and substantive effects of descriptive representation in the Netherlands","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Comparative politics; Politics; The Symbolic; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Political economy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.037037771146631544,"score_gpt":0.3480414575690135,"score_spread":0.31100368642238196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022168360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854304,0.000033936798,0.000056216046,0.0018861179,0.00006956895,0.0004119282,0.0000036881593,0.000009881488,0.012098255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915314,0.000030677646,0.000064858476,0.00030242343,0.000107576605,0.00005866069,0.0000028435368,0.0000048002,0.00027500256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988057,0.00026266012,0.00015055279,0.00014652137,0.00019244634,0.00044212228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989721,0.0007043185,0.00006800737,0.00011000552,0.00006688425,0.00007867718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052910333,0.00006965362,0.00013659458,0.000076983786,0.00016877266,0.000088626904,0.00010874218,0.000056899586,0.0000045067554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042551194,0.0000539688,0.000025081004,0.00018707967,0.00016306117,0.00019259352,0.0000087032095,0.00006389355,3.4059343e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029918492,0.00014337085,0.0103370845,0.00005222195,0.000027027008,0.000003966958,0.71288186,0.0000015761914,0.0040435316,0.2689753,0.00019742323,0.00330671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074957276,0.00019438501,0.5193436,0.000030397325,0.000015832311,0.0000012723433,0.25642726,0.000045667846,0.0020159455,0.22020473,0.0008499078,0.0001214208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006692474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056602898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50900656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013462942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009819565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22007838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048544399","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500148","title":"Electoral Systems and Turnout","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Comparative politics; Skepticism; Voter turnout; Political science; Demographic economics; Set (abstract data type); Political economy; Positive economics; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.024878776665598477,"score_gpt":0.321795472890716,"score_spread":0.2969166962251175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048544399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8914932,0.00020803834,0.000017769615,0.004547619,0.00028578556,0.00019120815,0.0000087084245,0.00010135708,0.10314631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367905,0.0000016206159,0.000012725004,0.00010983242,0.0010802592,0.000015096285,0.0000047673648,0.00000820973,0.0050884294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877006,0.00015687801,0.00017377218,0.00013379885,0.0002085878,0.00055690703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947536,0.00014060365,0.000032739837,0.00009725437,0.000060987357,0.0001930398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022918182,0.0000750558,0.0001226642,0.000034861354,0.00026941928,0.00013755319,0.000068841735,0.000083517436,0.000058147692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001107378,0.000068678644,0.000024793046,0.00009944376,0.00017828569,0.0001351772,0.000011618169,0.00006718156,0.000050703125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016967717,0.000016969443,0.029916802,0.000011990913,0.0000034826232,0.0000014112788,0.00015956147,5.963855e-7,0.00043879985,0.9653876,0.0040293555,0.00003174145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004341581,0.00013661485,0.2193091,0.00006568608,0.000053198473,0.000009266068,0.00039106113,0.00023533753,0.00046985594,0.053673416,0.7246851,0.00053724245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16712283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056853793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9117142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088592744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008204545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8384234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055530293","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.2","title":"Strengthening democracy through bottom-up deliberation: An assessment of the internal legitimacy of the G1000 project","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Political science; Democracy; Polity; Comparative politics; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.037999432448988624,"score_gpt":0.3966095751175995,"score_spread":0.35861014266861085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055530293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90501374,0.0000070900232,0.000107845925,0.0073696696,0.0010854771,0.00031627624,0.000021700544,0.000024882154,0.086053304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970736,0.000007875042,0.00067894725,0.0007282525,0.00081912207,0.00001195277,0.0000020197576,0.000011781665,0.0006664617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789834,0.00071765884,0.00032980935,0.00013691855,0.00053992984,0.00037732007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985254,0.0006628714,0.00020671249,0.00036154853,0.00016994632,0.00007356882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003699865,0.00010258546,0.00017586371,0.00002123613,0.0004838533,0.000052160736,0.00062671065,0.00008656163,0.00008440442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008919982,0.00006572077,0.00012553913,0.00018967493,0.0007011299,0.00024962885,0.00009567191,0.00022548134,0.0000013455332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039358397,0.00007560396,0.028626997,0.0000199143,0.00003104015,1.3177363e-7,0.041257422,0.0000014855037,0.00059328374,0.9268279,0.001178951,0.001383346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021887321,0.0005575701,0.23787516,0.0006227602,0.00052221003,0.0000114938375,0.091795884,0.0017415043,0.038959287,0.3657704,0.25896218,0.0009928364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00922197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051345985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5610575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009207118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086285215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062174049","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.1","title":"Political death and survival in the Netherlands: Explaining resignations of individual cabinet members 1946–2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Politics; Comparative politics; Proportional representation; Law; Political economy; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; History; Democracy","score_opus":0.06803389538573905,"score_gpt":0.3526802159491049,"score_spread":0.28464632056336586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062174049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8735558,0.00001591301,0.000036742953,0.011552825,0.00014047812,0.00018879771,0.000020320595,0.000021493654,0.11446765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894875,0.0000011793217,0.000051820884,0.00046500424,0.0003389837,0.000019364727,0.000008716188,0.0000074580557,0.00015873366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997657,0.0008774187,0.0002771727,0.00014335345,0.00042342042,0.00062163174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977435,0.0017971798,0.000050499137,0.00015068219,0.0000576357,0.00020050212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018281619,0.0000881063,0.00017279247,0.000072425544,0.00020992947,0.00006583701,0.00021084907,0.00010381174,0.000058157308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013078499,0.000066942644,0.00003158092,0.00016719117,0.00030500174,0.00011796975,0.000026210037,0.0001509932,0.0000037494772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003332964,0.000027532564,0.04850461,0.0000082706,0.0000061477185,4.6629052e-7,0.0049143657,6.9684927e-7,0.000032007745,0.9461239,0.00031808423,0.00006060053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090086565,0.00030795258,0.8103661,0.00008539477,0.00008768796,0.0000040493487,0.012974499,0.000314038,0.00017454589,0.14865723,0.025747541,0.00038012888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026480503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007595503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79746664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043650678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010142931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9800022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091666747","doi":"10.1057/ap.2012.31","title":"Genocide since 1945","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Comparative politics; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.021851055308967526,"score_gpt":0.1982858063351424,"score_spread":0.17643475102617487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091666747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03804871,0.00005530853,0.000029500314,0.010468104,0.00045353483,0.00015002681,0.000044689903,0.00016400915,0.95058614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9039759,0.0000025532179,0.000088820416,0.003991554,0.0007554332,0.000027731641,0.000015373169,0.000018102426,0.091124505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989119,0.00002881838,0.00021500236,0.00018026867,0.0001518153,0.0005121714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992409,0.00011294818,0.000027971068,0.00024401491,0.00008956183,0.00028464696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000032405755,0.00013646939,0.00015795566,0.000040417264,0.00022861018,0.00014830464,0.00020005259,0.00004226717,0.008017786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005352307,0.00011060834,0.000082301536,0.000020077554,0.00031874646,0.00030799568,0.000047798905,0.00013162407,0.0042290934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011813756,0.00002722198,0.000023434435,0.000010120628,0.000010724211,0.0000032974958,0.0012878699,3.5151174e-8,0.000055047472,0.9718822,0.026068624,0.0006302251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008503994,0.000045712095,0.00039478403,0.000006289622,0.000009540069,0.000002139196,0.00027459828,0.00009612585,0.000014911493,0.10896692,0.88993454,0.00016941038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00346811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000095478405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8659272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007284658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004136795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327481364","doi":"10.1057/ap.2016.3","title":"Indifference and alienation: Diverging dimensions of electoral dealignment in Europe","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Legitimacy; Politics; Relation (database); Political economy; Political science; Economic system; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03663730358800745,"score_gpt":0.3268610084308456,"score_spread":0.29022370484283816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327481364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99111354,0.000017787379,0.000020281142,0.005105445,0.000055511475,0.00009730517,0.000006886508,0.000013913963,0.0035693322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993945,0.000014688982,0.000021887372,0.000092834576,0.00005880765,0.000006674165,7.288529e-7,0.0000039161673,0.00040596066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902236,0.00017336434,0.00017441898,0.0001121544,0.00018617304,0.00033154906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940175,0.00026906925,0.000041211766,0.00007549247,0.00007489231,0.00013759405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021658634,0.000052994314,0.00010316061,0.00005246885,0.000091709015,0.000012811095,0.00006532406,0.000039302646,0.00006106696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043091062,0.000033731307,0.000011458408,0.0001704914,0.00017379993,0.00011071453,0.000030157127,0.00003180381,0.000008894776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004052692,0.00003131083,0.25383067,0.0000070357305,0.0000039932142,0.0000013066891,0.0017387377,5.4602985e-8,0.00754334,0.7361794,0.000120031116,0.00054008205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000503006,0.0001373123,0.9314116,0.00018795922,0.000016834523,0.0000010542625,0.00017378858,0.000015785032,0.0054267514,0.050204586,0.011700079,0.00022119493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008613794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002143684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073850766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081653634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473019991","doi":"10.1057/ap.2016.2","title":"Experiencing political diversity: The mobilizing effect among youth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Politics; Viewpoints; Comparative politics; Collective action; Interpersonal communication; Face (sociological concept); Political communication; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Political economy; Psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.031810766169548456,"score_gpt":0.30624921293714763,"score_spread":0.27443844676759915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473019991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236259,0.000015713644,0.000014609276,0.007942765,0.00074131746,0.00022891008,0.00001888109,0.00012980233,0.06728211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968055,0.000008480548,0.000008871706,0.0009994681,0.0014631762,0.000018869074,0.00000100102,0.00001536735,0.00067924807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972696,0.00051680906,0.00016176475,0.00022137909,0.0005197417,0.0013107299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965265,0.0025284663,0.00004257768,0.0002823998,0.000068366324,0.00055172533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046292596,0.00014262277,0.00018921868,0.000047356396,0.0016442098,0.000074938165,0.0004889779,0.00014842289,0.00021742987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025632856,0.00008287235,0.00012802507,0.0001497239,0.0016656127,0.0002442418,0.00028052117,0.00014053416,0.00008542277],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069660646,0.000021157617,0.19345194,0.000006203766,0.00002494943,0.000007402363,0.13480724,8.870353e-9,0.0002091789,0.67017984,0.0004863479,0.000798743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014898828,0.00035875445,0.051648118,0.00025392638,0.00036278844,0.000005203328,0.82344246,0.0000038711246,0.011252673,0.050724696,0.059363134,0.0010944835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014425196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027848198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68863523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034356423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018129648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532239495","doi":"10.1057/s41269-016-0022-0","title":"The political consequences of changes in district magnitude","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Fritz Thyssen Stiftung; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Comparative politics; Legislature; Politics; Electoral system; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Positive economics; Political economy; Fragmentation (computing); Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05025155030474399,"score_gpt":0.3592978560495143,"score_spread":0.3090463057447703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532239495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71023446,0.000051115658,0.0000048134466,0.23230177,0.00021693336,0.00019394263,0.00003110239,0.000029328592,0.05693653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975678,0.000022641556,0.000006790155,0.00027803713,0.0002309384,0.000024082252,4.0797755e-7,0.0000046464093,0.0018646874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981565,0.00033438127,0.0002282667,0.0001141011,0.00030393281,0.0008628496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973912,0.0020945463,0.000055663957,0.00014304576,0.000092732866,0.0002228052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005268462,0.00006812244,0.00013198669,0.000037123616,0.00016239249,0.000030246616,0.00020061349,0.00007778881,0.0001423005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021738163,0.000036762198,0.00003460655,0.00015027833,0.00085258106,0.00007299016,0.000023159024,0.000057259753,0.000038036836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000506448,0.000017791353,0.06443986,0.000005286634,0.000004490241,0.0000011487508,0.00014184274,4.865677e-9,0.0018119767,0.93277884,0.00037029176,0.00042337435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075910613,0.00031212767,0.28415135,0.00024677,0.00004311772,0.0000033584342,0.0027757958,0.0000023414377,0.033529576,0.40628415,0.27144384,0.0004484441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02857803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02626453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5264947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002429887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001974069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535928848","doi":"10.1057/s41269-016-0023-z","title":"The language of threat: Linguistic perceptions and intergroup relations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Linguistics; Independence (probability theory); Perception; Multilingualism; Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Sociology","score_opus":0.03085975610254248,"score_gpt":0.4245393582941136,"score_spread":0.3936796021915711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535928848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7117527,0.0000790087,0.000018869365,0.022783652,0.00022057263,0.0000843362,0.000019779442,0.000030057114,0.265011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748567,0.00008607131,0.00005859113,0.00014534884,0.0002808142,0.000004582976,7.760763e-7,0.0000035679927,0.024563584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995299,0.00007117538,0.00010116997,0.00006208338,0.00007728093,0.00015839473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895906,0.000739958,0.000029517605,0.00012258627,0.000058783502,0.00009011334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017361992,0.000034778554,0.000044315537,0.00002689443,0.00033639942,0.000020372818,0.000092654656,0.00003057067,0.00042098312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022950936,0.00002018568,0.000022345626,0.000053601525,0.00043789967,0.000036189944,0.000017577097,0.000035621848,0.00004705831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017794187,0.000018233988,0.003486027,0.0000021458782,0.0000064717624,1.3065912e-7,0.099044695,7.508816e-9,0.00049632665,0.88746357,0.0012003826,0.008280237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035833308,0.00004819768,0.1752075,0.000089835405,0.000046457644,0.0000027579995,0.07011154,0.0000117361915,0.00020574844,0.035365988,0.7183467,0.00020519526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003881303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016420602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8520976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032162803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001304325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5867395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791675548","doi":"10.1057/s41269-018-0078-0","title":"Young deputies in the European Parliament: a starkly underrepresented age group","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Comparative politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Variation (astronomy); Comparative research; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.051654717339822076,"score_gpt":0.3355138368638803,"score_spread":0.28385911952405823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791675548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23458193,0.0000326469,0.00005886659,0.0046469737,0.0002888207,0.0002107027,0.0000058774895,0.000044493256,0.7601297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696136,0.000030947464,0.00005340497,0.00085988146,0.0007703949,0.000008502658,0.000011409521,0.000012047029,0.001292049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977143,0.00095313956,0.00018307779,0.00019814247,0.0003774122,0.0005739418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936366,0.00015902969,0.000041765918,0.00028564752,0.00004275303,0.00010716261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009349883,0.0000898746,0.00008584511,0.00007176026,0.0004458548,0.00020129324,0.0003894799,0.000040571547,0.0000869134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001616286,0.00006779892,0.00004699762,0.00019779438,0.0006403881,0.00013628008,0.000068279405,0.00011731803,0.000082946295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000901209,0.00020234552,0.018908273,0.000012209481,0.000034569624,0.000081623446,0.1666114,6.0486474e-7,0.00026655055,0.8056017,0.0068346336,0.0014370531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006333843,0.0001175035,0.5668436,0.00003186738,0.000037797938,0.000010724303,0.17177767,0.000053006897,0.00009810843,0.11269837,0.14735758,0.00034031857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02699573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011682114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7623794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007597458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057460114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886596715","doi":"10.1057/s41269-018-0110-4","title":"The effects of survey mode and sampling in Belgian election studies: a comparison of a national probability face-to-face survey and a nonprobability Internet survey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Context (archaeology); Nonprobability sampling; Survey data collection; Comparative politics; National election; Sample (material); Contrast (vision); Variation (astronomy); Survey research; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Statistics; Geography; Computer science; Social science; Law; Socioeconomics; Demography; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.341309117671223,"score_gpt":0.50910517934672,"score_spread":0.16779606167549693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886596715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99826974,0.000150358,0.00036804422,0.00022036041,0.00017245107,0.00062151713,0.00011512303,0.000011994903,0.00007042869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994781,0.000028638644,0.00035825404,0.000033348664,0.000022378596,0.000024067323,0.000010629749,0.000006538595,0.000038020313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96134037,0.03702627,0.0005037428,0.0003834679,0.00032564503,0.0004205004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8959287,0.10284979,0.00015025123,0.00019210055,0.00076609984,0.00011310195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06938897,0.00013333252,0.00043778238,0.00009062909,0.00026523502,0.0000234721,0.00020908186,0.00014201534,0.0000033282417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23320767,0.000109088825,0.000026809936,0.0005229441,0.0017941924,0.00009504396,0.00014167416,0.00017773907,8.642978e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021923939,0.0001315872,0.9761254,0.0000623907,0.000052026113,6.030426e-8,0.02022511,0.0000019333806,0.00023101683,0.0006070121,0.000083379295,0.0002876518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025190527,0.00030218056,0.99428886,0.000041607207,0.000005014213,3.1176958e-7,0.0007562756,0.000100693724,0.0008812232,0.003237893,0.000033193428,0.000100843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10949674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57025003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4607533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016159982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003297221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9582599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967975393","doi":"10.1057/s41269-019-00139-2","title":"Finding deliberative niches: a systemic approach to deliberation for conflict resolution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Sociology; Politics; Conflict resolution; Order (exchange); Democracy; Epistemology; Political science; Ecology; Social science; Law; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.065279632763038,"score_gpt":0.35192937580643924,"score_spread":0.28664974304340124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967975393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87595683,0.00006814704,0.0027693857,0.0040313182,0.001093057,0.0022157053,0.000067853216,0.00014991242,0.11364781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921086,0.000010251562,0.001612409,0.0014381243,0.0010231377,0.00019680556,0.00003371523,0.000019399635,0.0035575498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984008,0.00020006034,0.00023050378,0.00024688433,0.0002783078,0.0006434605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861825,0.0006722383,0.00006230848,0.00016903997,0.00020721734,0.00027095247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003763243,0.00011528992,0.00020299824,0.00008316554,0.0004045576,0.0001053404,0.000182452,0.00017096773,0.000029307617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091521535,0.00012055833,0.00007579261,0.00018169689,0.00008669455,0.00018818166,0.000023620833,0.00009740621,0.00012971139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026088775,0.000045326924,0.00095121167,0.00006620987,0.00003075954,2.1337515e-7,0.103013255,0.00001709165,0.0017000621,0.88736606,0.0065436126,0.00024012086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021000386,0.0005392832,0.002128876,0.00033237212,0.00019990941,0.000011266511,0.19114667,0.0029261138,0.0036711728,0.015748342,0.7798813,0.00131469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010463062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056262594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8716177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035476504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003579705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4916226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089111394","doi":"10.1057/s41269-020-00181-5","title":"Impartiality and public sector employees’ online political activity: evidence from three Australian elections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Comparative politics; Politics; Political science; Public sector; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.2959114714759938,"score_gpt":0.4458712349381647,"score_spread":0.14995976346217094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089111394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6478264,0.000009285607,0.000052929397,0.34741133,0.00004974917,0.00014332468,0.0002595492,0.00011170618,0.004135785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573255,0.000017534789,0.000115090974,0.0024238364,0.0013751318,0.000016550379,0.000018545214,0.000012044673,0.0002887153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729294,0.00040489357,0.00021474028,0.00038883655,0.0005275808,0.0011710227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679744,0.00083173154,0.000046246623,0.00023399542,0.00013310774,0.0019574608],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003077653,0.0001423482,0.00020520661,0.000066694854,0.0006193206,0.00047553185,0.00036442917,0.00013173239,0.0011566844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005045346,0.00014355694,0.00006850026,0.0004381293,0.00079337123,0.0008544931,0.000120031975,0.00039636742,0.00004489157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058937334,0.00042518764,0.07766431,0.000029319202,0.000099386016,0.000019903331,0.0025199228,8.586392e-8,0.005911093,0.90223306,0.010087616,0.00095118687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007092338,0.0006468353,0.69193226,0.000058509035,0.000083799394,0.000008332676,0.004694327,0.0003597921,0.0026739114,0.050155852,0.24785559,0.00082156376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04586575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023756273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8520772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015313494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015103633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159246116","doi":"10.1057/s41269-021-00203-w","title":"Do voters prefer more parties on the ballot?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Legitimacy; Democracy; Voting; Political science; Ideology; Comparative politics; Position (finance); Direct democracy; Secret ballot; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.07775161848943901,"score_gpt":0.3607861759419572,"score_spread":0.2830345574525182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159246116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7160532,0.000040374565,0.000004240866,0.11821991,0.00027900568,0.00014015846,0.0000108043405,0.000057296096,0.16519503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889893,0.000004458754,0.000006988174,0.0037281474,0.0004797613,0.000028754612,0.0000032470987,0.000008455305,0.0068412605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984825,0.00033492647,0.00014899544,0.00015776388,0.0003348458,0.0005409249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898404,0.0004755278,0.000026261665,0.00022709419,0.000096843345,0.00019023815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029168124,0.00008059803,0.00010257034,0.000015045217,0.000391449,0.00013741602,0.000140484,0.00007126873,0.0009246284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008016743,0.000055541375,0.000061313316,0.00013299717,0.00024446176,0.000087929046,0.000025190542,0.000114531606,0.00021471351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029012222,0.000028713994,0.002175167,0.0000049573064,0.000011964668,0.0000027384672,0.002438615,6.704436e-7,0.00021376918,0.98526347,0.009766083,0.00009097622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020923826,0.00010118515,0.05646848,0.000098586024,0.00005294767,0.0000020828154,0.0060807182,0.00003595901,0.00592803,0.07168469,0.85896933,0.00036875694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003695726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096509355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91357875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017178805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205938999","doi":"10.1057/s41269-021-00219-2","title":"‘Let’s agree to disagree’: political disagreement with contact ties and non-electoral political participation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Politics; Political science; American political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0370317917951437,"score_gpt":0.35315224740299067,"score_spread":0.31612045560784696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205938999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893092,0.000027273732,0.00026541008,0.07072883,0.00021422842,0.00046832024,0.00005304587,0.000096993404,0.038836703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931641,0.0000014402237,0.00021568054,0.0040403693,0.0008560596,0.00008998845,0.000030232095,0.000030870004,0.0015712653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995564,0.00040251104,0.0004523705,0.0005157947,0.0007539062,0.0023114558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656326,0.0005109221,0.000055412685,0.00035717568,0.00033577773,0.002177428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035537445,0.00027656427,0.00041744774,0.00008518027,0.000521405,0.0002961512,0.0001682925,0.00017575262,0.00038235507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008561773,0.00024156392,0.000078993566,0.00034777672,0.00044248652,0.00032671445,0.00009655688,0.00021920385,0.000121103934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038429414,0.00014818153,0.09399236,0.00003618174,0.000041401832,0.000024927089,0.0011627339,5.0378304e-7,0.0006687172,0.9027903,0.00092921115,0.00016702207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015398413,0.0014666368,0.89889634,0.00029542673,0.00033199898,0.000030157438,0.0051334854,0.00014151985,0.0061350157,0.03166684,0.053015307,0.0013474381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023920232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020016592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8711235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049839326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005707694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99786556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843887","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00338-6","title":"Are feminine traits a liability in elections?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Liability; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04937900450561423,"score_gpt":0.3727602350194126,"score_spread":0.32338123051379836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71763873,0.00011684678,0.000016202843,0.020991266,0.00041413587,0.00016741731,0.000016323056,0.00012284439,0.26051623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404436,0.000016116957,0.000037058515,0.00023778476,0.00032585062,0.000017067607,0.0000022099096,0.0000068133695,0.0053127497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990535,0.00009738113,0.00013226744,0.00018237105,0.00016702461,0.00036745833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956733,0.00017907136,0.00001653926,0.000083523955,0.000034890203,0.00011866434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027465195,0.000055704168,0.00007728816,0.00009730362,0.00012672508,0.0000966836,0.00008384475,0.00006734439,0.00021729503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037210764,0.000053290234,0.000042702122,0.00030896103,0.00012954911,0.00010734242,0.000014824229,0.00012244767,0.000053225147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002929242,0.00012186909,0.016633306,0.000063502695,0.000018550974,0.000024647125,0.021414518,0.0000030883423,0.00032585484,0.9520484,0.00786403,0.00147928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016401753,0.000027627615,0.6044047,0.000067484485,0.000021114274,0.0000042768793,0.018737214,0.0002463746,0.00037328614,0.14080732,0.23491916,0.00022746781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041180286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023843779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8112411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015724303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002130033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62252545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401814452","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00360-8","title":"(MIS)Perceptions of populism: do populists and anti-populists know what populism is?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; MacEwan University","funders":"Erasmus+","keywords":"Populism; Elitism; Oligarchy; Scrutiny; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.016354373554435996,"score_gpt":0.3328738846999744,"score_spread":0.31651951114553845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401814452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391169,0.004816101,0.000013819939,0.024439892,0.0031062032,0.0006516715,0.0002951308,0.000495082,0.027065184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98811984,0.002418765,0.0004253197,0.00178398,0.0008459262,0.000029787614,0.00006726694,0.000079446014,0.0062296735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957188,0.00031576067,0.00074995327,0.000885908,0.0010219566,0.0013076441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980211,0.00023110435,0.00014894466,0.0007128246,0.0001738491,0.00071214343],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006923345,0.0004395064,0.0006050687,0.00034026743,0.001012595,0.0010681783,0.00071601087,0.0003978195,0.0012173709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035041047,0.00042229972,0.00025598033,0.000703577,0.00092945626,0.0020990935,0.00016207907,0.00045589832,0.00023621389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031192307,0.0005297493,0.021005355,0.0006265735,0.00036397116,0.00017782487,0.078410044,8.6315464e-7,0.0046144314,0.77753216,0.098440826,0.018266989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001024248,0.00017789866,0.09528836,0.0021031795,0.00045090567,0.000056411027,0.026016552,0.000078699886,0.0009794607,0.08692739,0.7851218,0.0017750822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01049954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009399908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6906048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030690487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035873556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402379909","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00363-5","title":"David Howarth and Scott James (2023): Bank politics: structural reform in comparative perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Comparative politics; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03130749592662848,"score_gpt":0.2818897215969342,"score_spread":0.25058222567030575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402379909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7742279,0.0049737957,0.000013957306,0.0044902116,0.00031363993,0.00015307979,0.0003861549,0.000049488204,0.21539176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974019,0.00009030744,0.00010086374,0.00033699416,0.0001503208,0.000009404364,0.000014927545,0.0000129110595,0.0018823862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988033,0.000012694159,0.0003441776,0.00037773652,0.000042567666,0.0004195088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995598,0.00005478957,0.000050764873,0.00016972808,0.000037681268,0.00012719905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010590643,0.0001589263,0.00032802584,0.00025605215,0.00007978902,0.00015286825,0.00009944781,0.00008314181,0.00025089167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008385121,0.00016182268,0.00006464057,0.00023459378,0.00016381624,0.00032407528,0.000055570585,0.00016545285,0.00021122229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050574445,0.000009738377,0.0037572896,0.00002169211,0.000019325205,0.000006764841,0.0022742946,0.000001220403,0.0000036677482,0.9932813,0.00053989876,0.00007974905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036710105,0.0000938211,0.34628832,0.000070867565,0.000009176906,0.000020661926,0.004212195,0.0016840639,0.00008125257,0.5550744,0.091745585,0.00035259998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047338866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020606881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43820694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005555479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052455023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7156252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403555232","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00358-2","title":"Reconceptualizing “feeling represented”: A new approach to measure how feelings of political representation are constructed","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Feeling; Comparative politics; Politics; Representation (politics); Measure (data warehouse); Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.08474994366302897,"score_gpt":0.3462458908976725,"score_spread":0.26149594723464353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403555232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6023716,0.00035783448,0.0020030846,0.080297105,0.0015196535,0.0010684317,0.000115613606,0.00076680613,0.3114999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930778,0.00001390293,0.0017829908,0.0003903734,0.0009382088,0.000013010919,0.00002005389,0.000019900299,0.0037437188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782175,0.00022851743,0.00028282302,0.00043503867,0.00056038244,0.00067151827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861676,0.00031863985,0.00006770287,0.00021965815,0.00026459532,0.0005126643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032818178,0.0001468289,0.00027376282,0.00010157827,0.00026994696,0.00023965948,0.00027237367,0.00018471952,0.00010159747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027164407,0.00013784651,0.00015533989,0.0007117597,0.00035547258,0.00031279048,0.0000673312,0.00022081073,0.000027571275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010788147,0.000026620948,0.0015306458,0.000048312668,0.00006413315,0.0000047243957,0.023416752,0.0000034784302,0.0010558612,0.9632305,0.008686112,0.0019220854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092219946,0.000088273846,0.011900878,0.0011873927,0.0004331032,0.000052434072,0.7953447,0.0023372895,0.0030469766,0.10094449,0.08227827,0.0014639965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00964736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002713677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.862286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020569887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004027927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99694747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413652472","doi":"10.1057/s41269-025-00397-3","title":"Striking a major chord: music preferences as predictors of vote intentions in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Chord (peer-to-peer); Comparative politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01580976222538053,"score_gpt":0.2762988917261826,"score_spread":0.26048912950080205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413652472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8680707,0.000027695494,0.0000014014246,0.002254091,0.00041414806,0.00011781468,0.000026703947,0.000014875148,0.12907252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974755,0.000017445886,0.000011712717,0.00022380843,0.00006290874,0.000010888203,0.000005157141,0.0000022954184,0.0021903065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990815,0.00007607837,0.00018141237,0.00011160761,0.0002553004,0.00029410637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960566,0.00012291897,0.000043526805,0.00007396066,0.0000809858,0.000072949966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000101716585,0.00006196842,0.00012258078,0.00004974895,0.00016687598,0.000021080532,0.00021462598,0.0000529181,0.00008769604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004592314,0.000055920453,0.000036632133,0.0003917068,0.00014332435,0.0000896232,0.00004031339,0.000101806756,6.1038145e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011458045,0.00006935224,0.24782464,0.00004586981,0.00008608095,0.0000041080857,0.009519972,0.0000026008665,0.0002820738,0.73573905,0.0033172849,0.0030974976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042288483,0.00004043845,0.77965534,0.00028974304,0.00008898439,3.692541e-7,0.09040747,0.000068475376,0.00021039676,0.07595238,0.0525759,0.00028761532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97910905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6597867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004027758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00260076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46136364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}