{"meta":{"query_hash":"d6f7e07d6143","filters":{"venue":"Acta Politica"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d6f7e07d6143","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Acta+Politica"},"results":[{"id":"W1970340122","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.18","title":"Does the government agreement’s grip on policy fade over time? An analysis of policy drift in Belgium","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Comparative politics; Public policy; Divergence (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Public administration; Policy studies; Political science; Policy analysis; Public economics; Economics; Political economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.010254049585489625,"score_gpt":0.31735346253745006,"score_spread":0.3070994129519604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970340122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696946,0.0012539454,0.0010060342,0.0064027854,0.000046661266,0.000027400883,0.00035178568,0.00003493561,0.02118178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758065,0.00022991981,0.00017868557,0.0001790151,0.000013278854,0.000013376927,0.000115081275,0.000022783648,0.0016671123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935796,0.0022672543,0.00030970885,0.0005533851,0.00082895905,0.0024610166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882442,0.005654226,0.0029220155,0.00046132007,0.0016588282,0.0010594169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009666915,0.00025694395,0.0014515567,0.0025635152,0.003001017,0.008917071,0.0012807937,0.0038615472,0.004969832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042175937,0.0003415569,0.0007677949,0.006927014,0.0030842875,0.0041909595,0.0032365338,0.0029166916,0.00051052036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036047632,0.0010491285,0.20277195,0.00058670796,0.00059885543,0.0024481341,0.0316375,0.06975278,0.0019598298,0.5563801,0.011835436,0.11737486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003428348,0.00079830346,0.5603953,0.0011001694,0.0004060128,0.00064940774,0.09888008,0.04993179,0.002232851,0.16230465,0.12265596,0.00030267617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13467015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07783925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13467015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016045235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012223552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26777256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982530905","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500135","title":"Explaining the Rise of the LPF: Issues, Discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Politics; Comparative politics; Voting; National election; Political science; Political economy; Novelty; Government (linguistics); Survey data collection; Panel data; Endogeneity; Primary election; Feeling; Panel survey; Split-ticket voting; General election; Law; Sociology; Economics; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.026988249617243047,"score_gpt":0.31954022226106593,"score_spread":0.2925519726438229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982530905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61316705,0.0017935922,0.0023234838,0.050154466,0.00028884443,0.000052464657,0.00074263604,0.000018831017,0.3314586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838487,0.00017854622,0.00013669925,0.000409098,0.000060785424,0.00001699637,0.00010081888,0.000025925565,0.0152225075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658775,0.0013329895,0.00014991057,0.00027482465,0.0004322898,0.001222152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568486,0.0024096144,0.0006459495,0.0002151128,0.000664094,0.00038043517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799385,0.00017036179,0.00036632564,0.0012734248,0.0035168368,0.007510976,0.0011001822,0.0027520796,0.016863845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019446071,0.00031607327,0.00031845496,0.002783129,0.0033870025,0.0037000352,0.0025095649,0.0029209726,0.0008046267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035393873,0.000100978206,0.035466503,0.0001844559,0.00002757378,0.00091934256,0.073951475,0.0020852427,0.00050990074,0.83173007,0.023156574,0.03151406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017171675,0.00007761264,0.19528916,0.0003846062,0.00004758013,0.00037896205,0.12848729,0.00883136,0.0009774781,0.17636833,0.488889,0.00009686557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25266308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28765333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25266308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011822231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038613675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5023848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005694448","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.13","title":"Economic crisis, party competence and the economic vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Competence (human resources); Political science; Political economy; Economics; Positive economics; Law; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.020337137545077294,"score_gpt":0.30791351601020717,"score_spread":0.28757637846512984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005694448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8618976,0.00056193955,0.0007044252,0.006299336,0.00008332035,0.00002521364,0.00015201159,0.000008899479,0.13026725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734324,0.00007846135,0.000031954492,0.00007922756,0.000033007087,0.0000065447566,0.000028270288,0.0000029464973,0.0023962692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756086,0.0013259173,0.000075221236,0.00014311381,0.00020317038,0.0006917249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98870045,0.0066440357,0.0017892176,0.00042321527,0.00068227475,0.0017607117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045262636,0.00014648365,0.00045528403,0.0013609392,0.0018800345,0.0048099356,0.00038985984,0.0010748467,0.018132368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017335426,0.00014121988,0.0001877951,0.0014574045,0.003264433,0.0019916366,0.0025175666,0.001888307,0.0009148752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001826191,0.001337047,0.24480969,0.00017760339,0.00014176207,0.000586886,0.013894176,0.003505593,0.0009576728,0.672978,0.009011307,0.05077413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004147785,0.00033105977,0.6064599,0.0001689666,0.00006765167,0.00029241818,0.035037775,0.004678566,0.0005771269,0.31950107,0.03242124,0.00004942502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027473099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003688818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018132368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008467695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010701173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060658813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010952825","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500081","title":"The Roots of Social Capital: Attitudinal and Network Mechanisms in the Relation between Youth and Adult Indicators of Social Capital","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":196,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Socialization; Social psychology; Social reproduction; Political socialization; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Structural equation modeling; Positive economics; Psychology; Politics; Political science; Economics; Social science; American political science","score_opus":0.014888809041827723,"score_gpt":0.27453706523729604,"score_spread":0.25964825619546833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010952825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98280334,0.0011539279,0.0019010075,0.0034708318,0.000026643798,0.000013236688,0.00014680666,0.000008928709,0.010475358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919194,0.00025646065,0.00017403708,0.00003612612,0.000022556967,0.000004914569,0.00001784216,0.0000014102167,0.00029476974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989705,0.0005206837,0.000038485246,0.00014112347,0.0001396172,0.00018960741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98703605,0.008535833,0.002328082,0.00041475624,0.0006094601,0.001075802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002323022,0.00025001387,0.00027287405,0.0014057336,0.0007806605,0.0027744463,0.00052546663,0.0010130556,0.005119295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012094539,0.000323189,0.00024325975,0.0016323342,0.002588542,0.0028824622,0.0013679862,0.0011267756,0.00021853588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030672387,0.00038032868,0.8763134,0.00009315966,0.00018114444,0.00019826429,0.008183081,0.0012552601,0.00080006954,0.08389969,0.00049429014,0.027894616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024559036,0.00011497188,0.9476399,0.000092758055,0.00009798568,0.00011971751,0.0048358166,0.0027486226,0.00026657913,0.04222116,0.0018162678,0.000021570873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063796495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008230755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063796495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094117376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094728364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017125726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017415040","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.32","title":"Between populist rhetoric and pragmatic policymaking: The normalization of migration as an electoral issue in German politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Normalization (sociology); German; Rhetoric; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Political rhetoric; Sociology; Social science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018972318088298332,"score_gpt":0.3572644570991883,"score_spread":0.33829213901088995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017415040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19263798,0.0068345056,0.024788659,0.32340044,0.0019435651,0.000057252095,0.00007485541,0.00011070225,0.450152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193734,0.00026703265,0.00085240864,0.0032179372,0.00026938302,0.000025703519,0.0000074844893,0.0000368002,0.0033859154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770702,0.016481085,0.00059667457,0.0015676542,0.0022812965,0.0020030946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97955704,0.015214358,0.0014230242,0.001558286,0.0013355708,0.0009117622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02927409,0.0005680678,0.00082665967,0.0029485126,0.01388361,0.016952403,0.0014778586,0.008062597,0.0034460141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038678106,0.00059796305,0.0005748204,0.0034691258,0.061904058,0.012393586,0.008869666,0.010073316,0.0004470098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019515164,0.000009537672,0.00020648609,0.000024886238,0.000004851838,0.00003320547,0.008880142,0.00011293311,0.00006924905,0.9866468,0.001502452,0.0024899559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004602396,0.00001995324,0.0012503059,0.00015031885,0.000027813858,0.000059825856,0.013002862,0.0010138006,0.0004922663,0.93863916,0.045265198,0.000032463628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084579745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010226541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02927409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013199523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009799877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15481806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018278896","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500079","title":"Accounting for the Age Gap in Turnout","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Cynicism; Closeness; Demographic economics; Comparative politics; Politics; Voter turnout; Political science; Race (biology); Demography; Sociology; Voting; Economics; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.07300765249417925,"score_gpt":0.37975949876415005,"score_spread":0.3067518462699708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018278896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95788425,0.002747917,0.006962152,0.0035003244,0.0003429065,0.00003016635,0.0017556862,0.00013188957,0.026644649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469465,0.00022705986,0.00040333852,0.00008719817,0.00012115426,0.000010598696,0.0004013829,0.000016550122,0.0040381295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982811,0.00058391003,0.000093134266,0.0002789014,0.00023307659,0.00052982185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855634,0.008096877,0.0027931293,0.0011456445,0.0011242831,0.0012767315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004482948,0.00042153834,0.0008057626,0.0017732439,0.0008753188,0.0023355924,0.0007175769,0.0010652362,0.010286276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020051192,0.0002735834,0.00063302496,0.0019953363,0.00056228664,0.002500212,0.0016993233,0.001514632,0.0013448783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005178819,0.00016189559,0.8648435,0.00017445124,0.00043975734,0.00048300982,0.0027236054,0.009253023,0.00036944752,0.059889555,0.009041634,0.05210228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008650501,0.00029235936,0.8034278,0.00019871547,0.0005576995,0.0003759954,0.008615182,0.041221373,0.0011987541,0.111057095,0.03292028,0.000048369668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017059049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025805632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017059049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007197597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016218417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034411013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022168360","doi":"10.1057/ap.2008.43","title":"Women for women's sake: Assessing symbolic and substantive effects of descriptive representation in the Netherlands","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Comparative politics; Politics; The Symbolic; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Political economy; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.037037771146631544,"score_gpt":0.3480414575690135,"score_spread":0.31100368642238196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022168360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747448,0.00015096736,0.00031003414,0.0005604904,0.000024482173,0.000018663888,0.00008160374,0.0000026224675,0.024106285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738735,0.000058425667,0.00007036822,0.000032302014,0.0000046637074,0.000020512545,0.000057079207,0.000007905146,0.002361429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329364,0.004161058,0.00020696447,0.00050719816,0.0011614023,0.0006697286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859534,0.010146034,0.0017418317,0.0005755123,0.0010027427,0.00058053556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050290795,0.0002633485,0.00044110656,0.00076404697,0.0015241534,0.004549082,0.0010262682,0.0009753044,0.005147231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04165786,0.00025648795,0.00024927125,0.0015001956,0.0031111462,0.0023666946,0.002857519,0.0009608978,0.00036355248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028278052,0.0016485745,0.27879742,0.000400346,0.00029068824,0.0011249192,0.55139273,0.0028994565,0.003225678,0.07605868,0.005693913,0.0756398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020340222,0.00031051657,0.5025416,0.00026769348,0.0002953699,0.00027757938,0.4273014,0.0053693224,0.0026612284,0.016534407,0.044118617,0.00011888834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10295379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11799258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10295379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005347865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033971223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20470905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048544399","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500148","title":"Electoral Systems and Turnout","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Comparative politics; Skepticism; Voter turnout; Political science; Demographic economics; Set (abstract data type); Political economy; Positive economics; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.024878776665598477,"score_gpt":0.321795472890716,"score_spread":0.2969166962251175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048544399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9535451,0.00084144785,0.00022560646,0.0020432477,0.00004179553,0.00001142123,0.0002781469,0.000011781431,0.043001328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728405,0.00016272784,0.000022228167,0.0000352414,0.000033135413,0.00000405068,0.00007049675,0.0000028521217,0.0023852314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898297,0.00046428913,0.00002688823,0.000076032746,0.00007740359,0.00037242283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936987,0.00312367,0.0010059437,0.00017424606,0.00042101188,0.0015764387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017266489,0.00018549828,0.00034381403,0.0019662534,0.0017559328,0.003962287,0.0002965135,0.0007934867,0.022910058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005881699,0.00016406964,0.00025436076,0.0022621502,0.0014469058,0.0010728729,0.0013833435,0.0010150819,0.0014611168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001265061,0.0008430635,0.7814905,0.00014745085,0.0002860722,0.00065467966,0.015699295,0.0021929294,0.0009232401,0.15127058,0.0063155913,0.038911622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009203978,0.00023196488,0.9320168,0.000062681815,0.000106530824,0.00025019364,0.017728431,0.0014006066,0.00024805448,0.034502596,0.013337523,0.00002256642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006986992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01142655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022910058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010899066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007154005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0766418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055530293","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.2","title":"Strengthening democracy through bottom-up deliberation: An assessment of the internal legitimacy of the G1000 project","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Political science; Democracy; Polity; Comparative politics; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.037999432448988624,"score_gpt":0.3966095751175995,"score_spread":0.35861014266861085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055530293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4971503,0.0008126055,0.013176996,0.04632106,0.00035347155,0.0007371523,0.00029520967,0.00024162617,0.44091156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432015,0.00014183701,0.0022548002,0.00089074776,0.000045417994,0.00016326428,0.00004109714,0.000057821715,0.0020848073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9143378,0.059167657,0.0019997796,0.003182852,0.01448007,0.006831732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.767526,0.17585553,0.011012281,0.020538166,0.016280709,0.008787312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08194206,0.00081316865,0.0010729894,0.0035549472,0.005926253,0.015142401,0.0024978714,0.0056147706,0.0096280845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17847621,0.0004696088,0.00074222666,0.0038653845,0.020735076,0.0074355304,0.018958861,0.00533938,0.0008806239],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021753032,0.0005938797,0.038869176,0.00092322356,0.00033013607,0.00041856812,0.010221074,0.0056016636,0.001098222,0.79072374,0.009519423,0.13952568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00196656,0.0019436544,0.073321424,0.001909199,0.0006282507,0.0002916562,0.023265721,0.017189926,0.007282128,0.781561,0.09035057,0.00028990113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005045407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041648415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08194206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008877227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022909066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43335623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062174049","doi":"10.1057/ap.2014.1","title":"Political death and survival in the Netherlands: Explaining resignations of individual cabinet members 1946–2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Politics; Comparative politics; Proportional representation; Law; Political economy; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; History; Democracy","score_opus":0.06803389538573905,"score_gpt":0.3526802159491049,"score_spread":0.28464632056336586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062174049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99017286,0.00034353824,0.0002001129,0.0013933517,0.00003270591,0.000013130666,0.0008855504,0.000003519279,0.0069551845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550843,0.00013297687,0.000029851151,0.000033950793,0.000017513577,0.000011098577,0.00064848433,0.0000069557977,0.003610674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912816,0.0002111643,0.000034795637,0.0001175378,0.0000826701,0.00042574873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696004,0.0011679163,0.00084307103,0.00011360833,0.00040751518,0.00050778495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015541643,0.0002080572,0.00043835284,0.0012135387,0.0011119806,0.0022756357,0.0011353121,0.001278447,0.008290532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009102474,0.00029653328,0.00041572776,0.0020890257,0.0010971585,0.0012952862,0.0011352726,0.0015506978,0.0008809625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009492697,0.00033052542,0.8860843,0.00014137334,0.00025278493,0.001336698,0.02578215,0.017418532,0.00030704553,0.023985961,0.016249707,0.027161561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008508693,0.0000919311,0.89991945,0.00012443698,0.00009486622,0.00013266438,0.045084514,0.021858187,0.0002111011,0.0052973144,0.027048258,0.00005212835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4083895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45363066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4083895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037064536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017169579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81202483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091666747","doi":"10.1057/ap.2012.31","title":"Genocide since 1945","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Comparative politics; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.021851055308967526,"score_gpt":0.1982858063351424,"score_spread":0.17643475102617487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091666747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49392012,0.030564833,0.0005849455,0.03951452,0.0025762408,0.000046506124,0.0016475664,0.000051540952,0.4310938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914247,0.006684347,0.00013970798,0.004731261,0.00091579434,0.000028878638,0.00051877863,0.00002390924,0.07271044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864763,0.00021660807,0.000052365096,0.00017491808,0.00016863437,0.000739801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984005,0.00038898722,0.00037752287,0.000077725614,0.00025664835,0.000498614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011529817,0.00016931661,0.00029185216,0.0020521288,0.0038962306,0.0024911654,0.0003401682,0.0016522463,0.01664689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027971803,0.00018135377,0.00024505105,0.002857625,0.0034351202,0.0012349567,0.0025470303,0.0026692676,0.001960064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041505357,0.00016692166,0.078959875,0.0007625512,0.00008862792,0.0021517721,0.0362786,0.00048779312,0.0010011571,0.64763474,0.08275974,0.14929332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001449192,0.000056280307,0.16153072,0.00036601815,0.000018821074,0.00053981785,0.0071722777,0.00005014776,0.000279195,0.0058815777,0.8240741,0.000016569435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02848147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06748559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02848147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004873688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038301358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056631386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327481364","doi":"10.1057/ap.2016.3","title":"Indifference and alienation: Diverging dimensions of electoral dealignment in Europe","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Legitimacy; Politics; Relation (database); Political economy; Political science; Economic system; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03663730358800745,"score_gpt":0.3268610084308456,"score_spread":0.29022370484283816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327481364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98906004,0.00014918968,0.00020602731,0.00033418185,0.000007083098,0.0000059809195,0.000023479935,0.0000028889308,0.010211073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.000023937517,0.000026040761,0.000024957251,0.0000059765425,0.000003198122,0.000025077283,0.00000168418,0.0004043027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486816,0.0021586807,0.00033050278,0.00047998663,0.0007930096,0.0013696086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886917,0.005408314,0.0023408344,0.0006025299,0.0012316534,0.001724946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058915103,0.00015979593,0.0006241505,0.0038294918,0.0026764404,0.006021806,0.00092005497,0.0016108418,0.0045160353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019233508,0.00024091858,0.0003921788,0.003465384,0.005983211,0.0031680984,0.0066474043,0.0016179865,0.00035360444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013377608,0.0005103292,0.77905136,0.00008864005,0.00022821764,0.0003750444,0.07642141,0.0012770762,0.00082072325,0.09239795,0.001021133,0.046470422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038106155,0.00012546337,0.9424317,0.000039125054,0.00003345506,0.00013109695,0.040174093,0.0006374169,0.00015029078,0.013059403,0.0031510654,0.000028737246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005886809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007574456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006021806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015983741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009054758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031157672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473019991","doi":"10.1057/ap.2016.2","title":"Experiencing political diversity: The mobilizing effect among youth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Politics; Viewpoints; Comparative politics; Collective action; Interpersonal communication; Face (sociological concept); Political communication; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Political economy; Psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.031810766169548456,"score_gpt":0.30624921293714763,"score_spread":0.27443844676759915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473019991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94896394,0.000480626,0.00031259994,0.0037127526,0.00014076954,0.00002312979,0.00006265781,0.0000192443,0.04628432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997615,0.00018510237,0.00009268372,0.00025785455,0.000048892103,0.000012808375,0.000019964209,0.0000073364417,0.0017603969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997681,0.0012385406,0.00004109437,0.00016030222,0.00022848055,0.0006504486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561983,0.0016972278,0.00070430036,0.00019705619,0.00022705094,0.0015545501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025857142,0.00035122206,0.0003145117,0.0017427183,0.0056078103,0.007555071,0.0006556182,0.0014434322,0.010354085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006861763,0.0002794951,0.00034132515,0.0011360147,0.0030442062,0.0031900634,0.0064059724,0.0019062735,0.00060064544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000421563,0.0007185136,0.30442536,0.0002273841,0.0001238332,0.0014971526,0.55751634,0.00013943482,0.0029666177,0.034716982,0.009622581,0.0876243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007254776,0.00028885712,0.1431401,0.00027360272,0.00012996054,0.00069607235,0.79330045,0.00026583043,0.0010885989,0.008367191,0.052329183,0.00004757453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00361816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006617427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010354085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013147909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001223651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03463781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532239495","doi":"10.1057/s41269-016-0022-0","title":"The political consequences of changes in district magnitude","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Fritz Thyssen Stiftung; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Comparative politics; Legislature; Politics; Electoral system; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Positive economics; Political economy; Fragmentation (computing); Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05025155030474399,"score_gpt":0.3592978560495143,"score_spread":0.3090463057447703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532239495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424873,0.00022416977,0.0007036554,0.0033170944,0.000058507743,0.00002676282,0.00048253502,0.000017402232,0.052682545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981006,0.000027930324,0.0000399259,0.000035856472,0.000017893963,0.000005628975,0.000058670255,0.0000028768093,0.001710585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708986,0.0015038234,0.00008427366,0.00023512518,0.00030322885,0.00078366394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993616,0.0030433636,0.0012309488,0.00038406433,0.0008516408,0.0008740438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017785439,0.00010993966,0.00032077194,0.0011315688,0.0013404097,0.003303102,0.00044826668,0.00061741925,0.019004794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013787549,0.00017822253,0.00027878454,0.0021263943,0.0016903993,0.0012264883,0.0017815161,0.000864259,0.0008692999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002755054,0.0010176323,0.5683357,0.00032509668,0.00036005487,0.0007265834,0.009733003,0.020734988,0.0057623633,0.29954022,0.009132342,0.08157691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000822257,0.0002833089,0.9467642,0.000027767015,0.00006501648,0.00007540332,0.012252142,0.0030986893,0.00076391274,0.02440255,0.01216522,0.00001954481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007249632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01715285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019004794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017606408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091891474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063577354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535928848","doi":"10.1057/s41269-016-0023-z","title":"The language of threat: Linguistic perceptions and intergroup relations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Linguistics; Independence (probability theory); Perception; Multilingualism; Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Sociology","score_opus":0.03085975610254248,"score_gpt":0.4245393582941136,"score_spread":0.3936796021915711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535928848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170639,0.0005453292,0.0007075839,0.008583734,0.000111923684,0.000019915038,0.000026574016,0.000009104812,0.07293188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985336,0.00015694222,0.00005824144,0.00033403566,0.00003713302,0.0000078035655,0.000009079199,0.0000066060456,0.00085644645],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99076957,0.006526251,0.00022593666,0.00026752765,0.0012790214,0.0009317057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810673,0.010151678,0.0036973252,0.0003522475,0.0018253591,0.002906052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075119715,0.0003430015,0.0002773849,0.0024344353,0.0072779553,0.01194851,0.00069683173,0.0022465044,0.008596874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024894752,0.0002475494,0.0002185567,0.0016306628,0.0093550505,0.0044851177,0.0054245014,0.0034608669,0.00067757186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047272252,0.00045808533,0.07247016,0.00014642041,0.000038817896,0.0006934682,0.8472548,0.00020363618,0.0017563906,0.057025082,0.0024912115,0.016989158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033661043,0.00015508108,0.040388573,0.00013731589,0.000026159329,0.00022884444,0.9359936,0.00039742162,0.000248591,0.008989608,0.013353357,0.00004768097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076056854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067132367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01194851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017668793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020141408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03972757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791675548","doi":"10.1057/s41269-018-0078-0","title":"Young deputies in the European Parliament: a starkly underrepresented age group","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Comparative politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Variation (astronomy); Comparative research; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.051654717339822076,"score_gpt":0.3355138368638803,"score_spread":0.28385911952405823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791675548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710556,0.0016948289,0.0001757692,0.011665692,0.0002453772,0.000025942503,0.00006688462,0.000005816389,0.015064009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98221576,0.000761462,0.000062773135,0.0041647693,0.00007384613,0.000018102039,0.000038371418,0.000009459862,0.012655399],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381566,0.0019608077,0.00021536235,0.00036823237,0.00065654,0.0029834062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956157,0.0011207866,0.00067779765,0.000093959265,0.0003817156,0.0021100522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003728249,0.00019101395,0.0006297577,0.0011860179,0.0116193835,0.0076354,0.00079252326,0.0027565341,0.008338818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00847099,0.0003333487,0.0002534469,0.0020222967,0.0029381,0.003780282,0.0056293947,0.0023243674,0.0010480369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073385274,0.00044891055,0.3036468,0.0002803946,0.0000562633,0.006127711,0.5009329,0.00009367586,0.0027588762,0.06418416,0.020982083,0.099754415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037504793,0.00016879146,0.16969444,0.00037716614,0.000026012303,0.00207299,0.70507586,0.00016275066,0.0006970504,0.003362994,0.11828134,0.00004306574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024249107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05620782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024249107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025716117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055473777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048215926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886596715","doi":"10.1057/s41269-018-0110-4","title":"The effects of survey mode and sampling in Belgian election studies: a comparison of a national probability face-to-face survey and a nonprobability Internet survey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Context (archaeology); Nonprobability sampling; Survey data collection; Comparative politics; National election; Sample (material); Contrast (vision); Variation (astronomy); Survey research; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Statistics; Geography; Computer science; Social science; Law; Socioeconomics; Demography; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.341309117671223,"score_gpt":0.50910517934672,"score_spread":0.16779606167549693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886596715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94697386,0.008016814,0.030590719,0.002811733,0.0005214046,0.0024318905,0.00069080683,0.00011844986,0.007844222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827518,0.0010461949,0.012088571,0.0010693779,0.00023046578,0.0012185147,0.0003400288,0.000096805445,0.0011583436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.33387357,0.6392376,0.008200038,0.0054304204,0.011304273,0.0019541124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20392194,0.7404287,0.02386778,0.022104418,0.0077312454,0.0019458911],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34402293,0.00073672965,0.0012034882,0.0033870782,0.0019462651,0.002862043,0.0024540375,0.0024268413,0.004597334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.520764,0.0012179909,0.0030345703,0.0044649346,0.0034035638,0.0023579707,0.0027644983,0.0014129807,0.0005390543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013487265,0.001697381,0.82557344,0.0019695428,0.003298832,0.00034438656,0.012440738,0.0025794618,0.0009896818,0.004123031,0.0025131688,0.13098307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008716167,0.0062602335,0.9686692,0.0009153166,0.0028726577,0.0005668933,0.004755722,0.006880372,0.0014014243,0.0019261657,0.004759701,0.000120778124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021149177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025864694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6559771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030463154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004201609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80893654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967975393","doi":"10.1057/s41269-019-00139-2","title":"Finding deliberative niches: a systemic approach to deliberation for conflict resolution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Sociology; Politics; Conflict resolution; Order (exchange); Democracy; Epistemology; Political science; Ecology; Social science; Law; Biology; Economics","score_opus":0.065279632763038,"score_gpt":0.35192937580643924,"score_spread":0.28664974304340124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967975393","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025704708,0.00041365155,0.9361454,0.005152525,0.00008389951,0.00038587407,0.00027626217,0.0003759807,0.03146163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55163676,0.00022653204,0.4433462,0.00027647355,0.00006720473,0.0007026599,0.00031977368,0.00018662997,0.0032378242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751805,0.016714845,0.0013141038,0.0025645029,0.0031523835,0.0010737418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92183095,0.060672633,0.0034096618,0.007948091,0.00406977,0.0020688083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022229293,0.001153175,0.0020028881,0.008286942,0.005796346,0.014969266,0.0036868928,0.0038181779,0.0145641025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07201502,0.0012502683,0.0029843724,0.0065924507,0.017345063,0.02198624,0.01622129,0.0042693024,0.0012557338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015077138,0.00016260783,0.0034952094,0.0004948272,0.000137929,0.00023265676,0.013241733,0.009523606,0.0011867707,0.89666235,0.0021065194,0.07260505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022097198,0.0000332491,0.00043309169,0.0001440458,0.00003122642,0.000069910486,0.0054203137,0.023947895,0.00057827943,0.96404016,0.0052542742,0.000025528612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017935417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027156943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022229293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033126653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007931324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11756116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089111394","doi":"10.1057/s41269-020-00181-5","title":"Impartiality and public sector employees’ online political activity: evidence from three Australian elections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Impartiality; Comparative politics; Politics; Political science; Public sector; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.2959114714759938,"score_gpt":0.4458712349381647,"score_spread":0.14995976346217094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089111394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98602366,0.00022186522,0.0000852322,0.00072632637,0.000018279388,0.000019919731,0.00012393124,0.0000043535315,0.012776451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697316,0.00013508146,0.000036131183,0.00012882093,0.000029540923,0.000013816442,0.00009443976,0.0000047165104,0.0025842513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370897,0.0029096673,0.0003270689,0.0003466197,0.001397623,0.0013101011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92404824,0.036963068,0.022544174,0.003205468,0.0059809946,0.0072580506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075773736,0.00018431526,0.00051888725,0.0017732878,0.0030001625,0.004681931,0.0008233622,0.0013332093,0.010361133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04156526,0.00045774947,0.00027019434,0.0035168084,0.0019411285,0.0025426683,0.0031981722,0.0023486854,0.0016523886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017249241,0.0015067903,0.8722019,0.00034359808,0.0002750265,0.00042596183,0.056777343,0.0003015472,0.0008873824,0.0059229257,0.006494802,0.05313777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022950866,0.00012469075,0.9807114,0.00003480461,0.00004063584,0.000032442607,0.013516917,0.00029122847,0.00012549495,0.0004456524,0.004635075,0.000018773406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049389042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077707164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049389042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015911389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001263569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09820312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159246116","doi":"10.1057/s41269-021-00203-w","title":"Do voters prefer more parties on the ballot?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Legitimacy; Democracy; Voting; Political science; Ideology; Comparative politics; Position (finance); Direct democracy; Secret ballot; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.07775161848943901,"score_gpt":0.3607861759419572,"score_spread":0.2830345574525182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159246116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96138656,0.0002121726,0.00038844245,0.0077075614,0.000087271575,0.000026771027,0.00025356564,0.000008724315,0.029928995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997572,0.00007600135,0.00005199456,0.000442814,0.00008457872,0.000007956624,0.0000854511,0.0000047793746,0.0016743715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698013,0.0014778604,0.00010246553,0.0002751965,0.0003015314,0.00086286734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98381424,0.007888871,0.00490392,0.00049399363,0.00084030064,0.002058669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002918392,0.00019501366,0.0005784679,0.0011454086,0.0012328723,0.003652164,0.0004727059,0.0022598978,0.03275874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016923042,0.00029638404,0.00036226114,0.0012930582,0.0012609666,0.0016369716,0.0008170475,0.0014638158,0.0031807625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046681375,0.0017884992,0.8703131,0.00042107646,0.0005448274,0.0005211261,0.0076781823,0.00056791,0.002196994,0.02503733,0.010012393,0.07625035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068031106,0.0007556727,0.9211411,0.00011195449,0.0002842416,0.00045676576,0.029439738,0.0013372218,0.0006924645,0.028386075,0.016660836,0.00005363854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025516478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004068211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03275874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040447415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041073165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10958892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205938999","doi":"10.1057/s41269-021-00219-2","title":"‘Let’s agree to disagree’: political disagreement with contact ties and non-electoral political participation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Politics; Political science; American political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0370317917951437,"score_gpt":0.35315224740299067,"score_spread":0.31612045560784696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205938999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707488,0.00027492832,0.00028039547,0.0069395467,0.00005324115,0.000019375922,0.00008039857,0.0000037634904,0.021599531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915135,0.00004287291,0.000031453448,0.00015128717,0.000029800582,0.000009808145,0.000033082386,0.0000026618452,0.00054762646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873767,0.008692312,0.00054628385,0.0008221898,0.0011024013,0.0014601507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8718078,0.09314748,0.018889362,0.0035289377,0.0040940023,0.008532341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144078955,0.00020376765,0.000534661,0.0018331697,0.0049497397,0.0066872616,0.0015884639,0.0040003313,0.015603587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08485038,0.00039334997,0.0003766149,0.002974013,0.007929246,0.005448161,0.0044255746,0.005393646,0.0010105569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012623519,0.0014761747,0.7858691,0.00016548911,0.0002673429,0.000915209,0.13306563,0.0003805422,0.00027103946,0.049516868,0.004212198,0.022598065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018460136,0.00025600073,0.73085636,0.00016410614,0.0001143482,0.00090644916,0.21044585,0.0015949793,0.00019377483,0.0487198,0.006503247,0.000060500435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061216787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005955536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015603587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012355162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012983469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07619709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394843887","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00338-6","title":"Are feminine traits a liability in elections?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative politics; Liability; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04937900450561423,"score_gpt":0.3727602350194126,"score_spread":0.32338123051379836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394843887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87030166,0.00092622574,0.0072036125,0.02961321,0.0003588428,0.00006153202,0.00028367856,0.00005436068,0.09119682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698466,0.00011291842,0.000393067,0.00073598354,0.00010453011,0.000014003631,0.000039536197,0.000012438137,0.0016027959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877122,0.005824584,0.00063393835,0.0013357117,0.0022633623,0.0022302002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483962,0.020255698,0.016868891,0.0064064744,0.0038901796,0.004182507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009692847,0.00020978927,0.0005568216,0.0015902732,0.0037562486,0.0032584763,0.0010241303,0.0034682539,0.00904778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10236761,0.00043548172,0.00031948095,0.0013560395,0.008571126,0.0034728334,0.0034029975,0.003120326,0.0010316441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055900885,0.000375463,0.6496815,0.00020357073,0.0001497869,0.0031870068,0.017337473,0.00035372304,0.0018022395,0.21874404,0.0055417563,0.102064505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007549066,0.0005304645,0.60759777,0.0004321572,0.00013413817,0.010068449,0.0279126,0.0017751966,0.0026969996,0.3182242,0.030455532,0.0000970455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021424224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029350815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009692847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057965535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012631032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051261306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401814452","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00360-8","title":"(MIS)Perceptions of populism: do populists and anti-populists know what populism is?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; MacEwan University","funders":"Erasmus+","keywords":"Populism; Elitism; Oligarchy; Scrutiny; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.016354373554435996,"score_gpt":0.3328738846999744,"score_spread":0.31651951114553845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401814452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5867322,0.0049525807,0.001376973,0.2572019,0.0009796884,0.000025925623,0.00017707657,0.000031054453,0.14852253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98897797,0.00062889425,0.000075654774,0.008829332,0.00021860164,0.00001220637,0.000025396577,0.000011827143,0.0012202199],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98932236,0.005427134,0.00032484165,0.0006868669,0.002540012,0.0016987826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676512,0.014215827,0.007801194,0.0013803308,0.004284295,0.004667075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136969555,0.00031736415,0.00056378735,0.0031804857,0.006539426,0.013168641,0.0010122678,0.005457142,0.00593627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04818562,0.00040677664,0.00037183057,0.0038594918,0.022583507,0.013726568,0.005236427,0.007928818,0.0007555377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021995984,0.00017208404,0.08677655,0.00023662235,0.00008891848,0.00035990527,0.59665126,0.00010973298,0.00052930403,0.27306682,0.013730081,0.028058799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006283037,0.00008540636,0.102569364,0.00062050606,0.00007822663,0.00040085719,0.6615826,0.00043772196,0.00044368516,0.1435622,0.09005217,0.00010444964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016890002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010213425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016890002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039126896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004048706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07243729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402379909","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00363-5","title":"David Howarth and Scott James (2023): Bank politics: structural reform in comparative perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Comparative politics; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03130749592662848,"score_gpt":0.2818897215969342,"score_spread":0.25058222567030575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402379909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079733855,0.104286306,0.0008749329,0.85550237,0.020559259,0.000009449379,0.00013817596,0.0000193228,0.017812924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09982965,0.124849185,0.0026268077,0.5316505,0.08574866,0.0001390224,0.0003185883,0.00021446178,0.1546232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971545,0.0013448007,0.00016434479,0.0003895361,0.00064694736,0.00029991113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913106,0.005132221,0.0006050834,0.00027054708,0.0017195666,0.0009620878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004996077,0.00096671283,0.0007820782,0.0032137334,0.0036674843,0.009212067,0.0012611721,0.015510141,0.02020531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017438186,0.00047090388,0.00045382703,0.0050295494,0.005531407,0.013115191,0.0028565342,0.010300865,0.003780485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004107847,0.000017560658,0.00033941623,0.000140061,0.000011688219,0.000041029532,0.0010548541,0.00007573999,0.00006501285,0.1804124,0.7962033,0.021597752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001991291,0.000008427677,0.0012107147,0.0004891009,0.000013551623,0.00005052817,0.0016058364,0.00014880912,0.00016446115,0.10225213,0.8940082,0.000028327953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022181612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044858333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022181612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063233767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047134613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067593515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403555232","doi":"10.1057/s41269-024-00358-2","title":"Reconceptualizing “feeling represented”: A new approach to measure how feelings of political representation are constructed","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Feeling; Comparative politics; Politics; Representation (politics); Measure (data warehouse); Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.08474994366302897,"score_gpt":0.3462458908976725,"score_spread":0.26149594723464353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403555232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95517224,0.00012838274,0.026997898,0.000785974,0.00006952411,0.00025168314,0.00017225166,0.00007675228,0.016345283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99084514,0.000064011234,0.007992705,0.00017254525,0.000023001776,0.00041029803,0.00012182256,0.000019833233,0.00035063238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98584414,0.009647994,0.00080815493,0.0006605612,0.0025215095,0.0005175749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522005,0.023790723,0.01177383,0.004952266,0.005693944,0.0015887738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014028557,0.0005644183,0.00046518954,0.005519923,0.0019463522,0.005056082,0.0010679364,0.0013186446,0.0027067738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0461208,0.00037124244,0.0008020698,0.0031654432,0.005465409,0.005124633,0.0063846745,0.0027916036,0.0003095669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005878585,0.0011363252,0.43049073,0.00080046745,0.00058228587,0.00031793362,0.33001778,0.0014208441,0.01134683,0.05244281,0.004307827,0.16654831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012828127,0.0009618903,0.5481437,0.0005694568,0.00032074552,0.0006505708,0.3407687,0.014871617,0.005406623,0.0650452,0.022660952,0.0004722876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010052148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012519272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014028557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015868805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011292406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074191034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413652472","doi":"10.1057/s41269-025-00397-3","title":"Striking a major chord: music preferences as predictors of vote intentions in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Politica","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Chord (peer-to-peer); Comparative politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01580976222538053,"score_gpt":0.2762988917261826,"score_spread":0.26048912950080205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413652472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99298966,0.00015540473,0.00005763305,0.0010892281,0.000021639908,0.000011869118,0.0005896465,0.000005840727,0.005079093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669456,0.00008892819,0.000029699988,0.000060195984,0.000006287424,0.000004013029,0.00022896123,0.0000052087803,0.002882146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989668,0.000115308016,0.00003359241,0.00011166576,0.0002523935,0.00052030757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936005,0.001015873,0.0009211522,0.00018105171,0.0015015907,0.0027798845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008393451,0.0002079977,0.00037928566,0.0010835367,0.004098806,0.002995387,0.0012153225,0.001268138,0.011928339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056123193,0.0002346724,0.0005140983,0.002321343,0.0012744988,0.00051194377,0.0010888833,0.0019169407,0.00072677556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022394556,0.00010026571,0.9882692,0.000012385903,0.00005717012,0.00009289862,0.0022867261,0.0003363176,0.000200195,0.00089091,0.0024488287,0.005081226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013466386,0.000023783043,0.9860714,0.000022163584,0.000028740456,0.00002308295,0.010222095,0.0008438936,0.000089072215,0.00018595571,0.0024551328,0.00002125633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98972416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99574775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015734842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015734842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032383293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11416483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}