{"meta":{"query_hash":"2d595747e74a","filters":{"venue":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2d595747e74a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Acta+Universitatis+Lodziensis+Folia+Iuridica"},"results":[{"id":"W3025978619","doi":"10.18778/0208-6069.90.07","title":"Reinach and Kantorowicz: Justice, Phenomenological Realism and the Free Law Movement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica","topic":"German Social Sciences and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Battle; Politics; Law; Yearbook; Sociology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; History; Art","score_opus":0.02007015704356402,"score_gpt":0.23503796487062492,"score_spread":0.2149678078270609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025978619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15679154,0.0018625549,0.00009005817,0.21392724,0.00042837253,0.00064544484,0.000057909754,0.000171242,0.6260256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99047667,0.0014916854,0.00042178825,0.006694192,0.00020034073,0.000002655789,0.000002448265,0.0000067786855,0.00070344476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841154,0.00029160193,0.00014551175,0.00035218772,0.00044013932,0.00035900576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990052,0.00030312515,0.00010847241,0.00017031608,0.00007033491,0.0003425396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049460004,0.00012819478,0.0002303895,0.000030131132,0.0019635092,0.00010454343,0.0004606672,0.00010278895,0.00019599091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023176572,0.00010191488,0.00005607755,0.00026387261,0.0030536228,0.00028900374,0.0003034334,0.00016638475,0.000012241748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005485001,0.000012066647,0.000038826736,0.000009011363,0.000026650148,0.000021634405,0.098440394,3.959854e-7,0.000053991804,0.86262244,0.037566233,0.0011535076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018579576,0.0001605629,0.0018947921,0.000011438193,0.0002698078,0.0000013841728,0.09882272,0.00007927991,0.000005573381,0.029397743,0.8671961,0.0003026274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006536192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026505562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8336851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104878505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008764805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160729184","doi":"10.18778/0208-6069.94.07","title":"The Centre–Periphery Antagonism in Adjudication: A Case Study on the Spatial Dimension of the Political","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Antagonism; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.02006088453581065,"score_gpt":0.27243187362048,"score_spread":0.2523709890846693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160729184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118468,0.00005975875,0.000005046857,0.055113114,0.0003361029,0.00033301875,0.000030963496,0.000015900914,0.032259267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971653,0.0000875317,0.00001132934,0.0014111263,0.00007619846,0.0000015186325,0.0000011428627,0.000009721278,0.0012361149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704975,0.0015188726,0.00022949961,0.00025474105,0.0005553434,0.0003918078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768215,0.0013304926,0.00017201884,0.00055149844,0.00015763589,0.00010621336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004896066,0.00011997199,0.0001440861,0.000033668748,0.0012672358,0.00004971187,0.00046348147,0.00005523577,0.00007179159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009955149,0.00007281295,0.000101906604,0.0005747998,0.0006775835,0.00010500529,0.00021458998,0.00025287026,0.000015826708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008897529,0.00069874164,0.012637193,0.0000055115547,0.000113275746,0.002239553,0.065878175,0.000006910242,0.0006822778,0.89539444,0.019185064,0.0030698946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016741246,0.00020724161,0.23579852,0.00012627563,0.00014172134,0.00012132103,0.51164347,0.00006090634,0.0032234318,0.0022121796,0.24440332,0.00038750435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018734753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016870914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003997114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155171274","doi":"10.18778/0208-6069.113.12","title":"Balancing of Fundamental Rights by the Employer? Employer’s Margin of Manoeuvre to Order Mandatory Vaccination and to Terminate or Suspend the Labor Contract of Non-Vaccinated Employees","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Iuridica","topic":"COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Margin of appreciation; Order (exchange); Fundamental rights; Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Margin (machine learning); Private rights; Human rights; Right to health","score_opus":0.0066540517993643215,"score_gpt":0.2599566727101203,"score_spread":0.25330262091075595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155171274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870914,0.00009286983,0.0063074273,0.00464174,0.00018066687,0.00087349775,0.00015296627,0.000048348727,0.00061108876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702233,0.00001940077,0.0017451049,0.0006287989,0.000007938761,0.000007876625,0.00000761081,0.000015989555,0.00054493913],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794227,0.00016132138,0.0005351113,0.00052240456,0.00045743602,0.00038144618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970796,0.0012037553,0.0003317543,0.00075814733,0.00049104134,0.00013567264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003928952,0.0002903562,0.0005018612,0.00046907726,0.00026747797,0.00010336831,0.0012576944,0.00008968787,0.00004576488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022195971,0.00020235407,0.00009341374,0.001551496,0.00008422446,0.00077132357,0.000725138,0.00016826564,0.0000041208086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060439296,0.0033808858,0.15462875,0.0029586605,0.004403517,0.0006241368,0.09220739,0.00045001143,0.30883875,0.06310593,0.21133532,0.1520227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005277452,0.0020083683,0.84939754,0.0010881458,0.00040061734,0.000029323617,0.0027834815,0.0021618453,0.11491707,0.00094154157,0.020056192,0.000938412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009957514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010964118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6947688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018785521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002842496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82517594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}