{"meta":{"query_hash":"6fe760512935","filters":{"venue":"Adelaide law review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6fe760512935","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Adelaide+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W2254632329","doi":"","title":"Are We 'Persons' Yet?: Law and Sexuality in Canada [Book Review]","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Project commissioning; Human sexuality; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04857682631416846,"score_gpt":0.3057611207997737,"score_spread":0.2571842944856052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254632329","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033806544,0.83157074,1.0145714e-7,0.0833725,0.000104055085,0.0004942315,0.000018730845,0.000023741959,0.08438206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016477528,0.7609322,0.000025137562,0.23357035,0.00006244361,0.00004129685,0.000002713825,0.0000073880087,0.003710722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980832,0.00046310204,0.000371825,0.00030277457,0.00041374096,0.00036535543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991803,0.00012005978,0.00019558071,0.00026682287,0.00005454707,0.0001826672],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007187801,0.00016302374,0.0005224266,0.0000013167056,0.00039502428,0.000027963211,0.00025864967,0.000090538604,0.0026551383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013282373,0.00013378373,0.000093472365,0.00029738035,0.0002903946,0.0002715195,0.000044169858,0.00029010247,0.000046832185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.7724266e-7,0.000016756321,0.0001618453,0.004049916,0.000011371642,0.00002284492,0.0006788713,6.9591444e-8,2.0417168e-7,0.08842578,0.9045738,0.002058259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007678881,0.000003939323,0.000022326427,0.011032255,0.00004992623,0.0000044175954,0.0004510979,9.691668e-7,6.826778e-7,0.0003354672,0.98783827,0.00018387838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65632087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96896386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31264296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028200133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012102219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271402948","doi":"","title":"The Order of Canada: Its Origins, History and Development [Book Review]","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Publishing; Project commissioning; History; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.014392195383675636,"score_gpt":0.223207558057493,"score_spread":0.20881536267381737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271402948","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007994456,0.90781057,7.653237e-7,0.0077758874,0.00020190682,0.00030944392,0.000003111257,0.000008546625,0.08388177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000088593864,0.9249028,0.00004788601,0.019484604,0.000061616265,0.000031536085,0.000003638706,0.0000071470677,0.055372156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988561,0.00012377805,0.00034540694,0.00013142664,0.00032811047,0.00021514729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938756,0.00007210008,0.00015343972,0.0001522655,0.00013523681,0.00009938481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068325904,0.00007447844,0.00024371436,0.000019570385,0.0007072546,0.000018689565,0.00018922173,0.000028260569,0.0010106754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012395068,0.00006780809,0.00003407086,0.000121427714,0.0003445337,0.0000994932,0.000019869067,0.00008419667,0.00002636492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.618654e-7,0.0000031914503,0.000002884651,0.0013513869,0.0000054599614,0.0000032809276,0.000050445655,3.1448113e-8,3.2409486e-7,0.13394915,0.85951716,0.005116412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029465371,0.000002107821,0.000039224975,0.0022748811,0.000029148574,0.000001490927,0.00000665898,6.1806205e-8,8.0801163e-7,0.000023670493,0.99750525,0.00008722708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9698835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13798808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002214225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058560725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510547108","doi":"","title":"Privatization, Law and the Challenge to Feminism [Book Review]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Publishing; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01758988237772049,"score_gpt":0.23084300669733357,"score_spread":0.21325312431961307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510547108","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030042085,0.78693014,0.000001888883,0.13468233,0.00006808086,0.0010806656,0.0000045919196,0.000028901228,0.07717336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003385702,0.8104003,0.000030290414,0.18365027,0.000074537835,0.000060034556,0.000011864107,9.903417e-7,0.0023859902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990545,0.00012537692,0.00029206366,0.0002138467,0.00014208865,0.0001721407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956906,0.000088270186,0.000079912614,0.000120340614,0.00004676376,0.00009564596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005451499,0.00012726375,0.00032907166,0.0000013753752,0.0002981236,0.000025758533,0.00020940088,0.000042796284,0.00080095686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055839664,0.000017705828,0.000088899775,0.00014936387,0.000117340736,0.00008848503,0.00005680453,0.00008493275,0.00008945867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020417945,0.000020188245,0.0000035000176,0.0008654013,0.000012071314,0.0000018560991,0.000025218513,3.161886e-8,0.000013808964,0.94096726,0.033193994,0.024894632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000909184,0.000044717992,0.000017669028,0.0030435096,0.00003432474,0.000016746782,0.000002238405,2.9191395e-7,0.000020597556,0.0050211917,0.9916022,0.00010561634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009552796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021887073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000058022283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033211659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87699157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589706160","doi":"","title":"Debtor-induced payments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Personal property; Creditor; Security interest; Business; Entitlement (fair division); Debt; Payment; Collateral; Legislation; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Economics; Property (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.046458767688263854,"score_gpt":0.3576727632583232,"score_spread":0.31121399557005935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589706160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035377436,0.012420734,0.0003273414,0.04349393,0.00023797693,0.0010452465,0.0000048505954,0.00020579385,0.93872637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95433193,0.018091418,0.0006332448,0.024387116,0.00033656988,0.0001241352,0.0000068460627,0.000013848655,0.002074916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909884,0.00015165894,0.00018574,0.00015702793,0.00020582233,0.00020088414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944484,0.000070019945,0.00006853714,0.0002535123,0.000042847394,0.00012024092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054265547,0.000067644985,0.00015366703,0.000005822605,0.0003658844,0.000035338446,0.0002581807,0.00003900473,0.00037172856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118219985,0.00005656607,0.00007457193,0.00015776958,0.000060302016,0.000125644,0.000037193706,0.000082290215,0.0009888771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5562347e-7,0.000011971342,0.000029421508,0.00006962252,0.0000036126328,1.8710597e-7,0.00005924667,8.819394e-8,0.000019755038,0.9552548,0.0043922677,0.040158853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046388064,0.0000076014435,0.00005955012,0.00028121975,0.000020127343,3.1460385e-7,0.0000065574022,0.0000061842843,0.000018247696,0.0028699145,0.99660534,0.00007853304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024415425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012029347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003295151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034334775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594172847","doi":"","title":"Personal property securities legislation: Analysing the new lexicon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Personal property; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Tangible property; Lexicon; Supreme court; Linguistics; Sociology; Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Property rights; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04429371174990055,"score_gpt":0.3279172351920104,"score_spread":0.28362352344210984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594172847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025806364,0.06044691,0.00101617,0.24583535,0.00010727699,0.0007661155,0.0000036428426,0.000111022004,0.6914555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91144013,0.035105996,0.00060487323,0.026453398,0.0017344656,0.0000829951,0.00001415075,0.000019178106,0.024544787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998984,0.0002159974,0.00019944865,0.00015737422,0.00026403877,0.00017914674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994615,0.00010318573,0.00008869667,0.00020378282,0.000058658712,0.00008422171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096087,0.000077975084,0.00015968077,0.0000070613805,0.0008423487,0.00012217124,0.00025734073,0.000033263364,0.00048745735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106424,0.000041729854,0.00011825891,0.00023253316,0.0002094654,0.00023670813,0.000034569217,0.00012517232,0.00015804861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4158506e-7,0.0000051454695,0.000019944277,0.000057924597,0.000008107078,1.15030524e-7,0.0010892086,0.00000113281,0.0000036791882,0.9506019,0.011875092,0.036337435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003602802,0.0000056412064,0.00003119267,0.00036089146,0.00005233353,0.0000010873579,0.00010823031,0.00013936132,0.000004117521,0.0057000383,0.9934837,0.00007737451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066348906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006206752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031991483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001381204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737061550","doi":"","title":"Security interests in mobile equipment: Lawmaking lessons from the Cape Town convention","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Lawmaking; Law; Statute; Project commissioning; Conflict of laws; Business; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.03624495063142262,"score_gpt":0.3620204312483227,"score_spread":0.3257754806169001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737061550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19578615,0.09053956,0.0005704717,0.09855417,0.0026049425,0.0035759236,0.000085186584,0.00024126079,0.60804236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845437,0.010491397,0.000024194844,0.00434378,0.00022562665,0.00007134657,0.00003578933,0.000005638129,0.00025856897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986899,0.0004302101,0.00027195958,0.0001703444,0.00027030281,0.00016728321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934757,0.0002783846,0.00013438663,0.00014666344,0.000057987432,0.00003502904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011757702,0.00007742443,0.00015923745,0.000010048543,0.00021973818,0.000060740455,0.00027339123,0.00004967675,0.0007027518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017303237,0.000058707086,0.00008439597,0.00011425914,0.000092646434,0.00022923427,0.000048442285,0.00014112322,0.0001229209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014737968,0.000020629448,0.0003377524,0.000038909024,0.000006407884,8.326169e-7,0.0006918866,0.000001768654,0.0000064815927,0.9857458,0.00077660487,0.012371472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102746395,0.000011677211,0.00038932043,0.0019243337,0.000018924733,3.4082106e-7,0.000087110304,0.000067269306,0.000021938198,0.04301653,0.9542789,0.00008092934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017823175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07801577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009120916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029815945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744793073","doi":"","title":"What lawyers should know about the forensic 'sciences'","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Project commissioning; Publishing; Criminal justice; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.2888551754999398,"score_gpt":0.514076434005937,"score_spread":0.22522125850599728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744793073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001364691,0.42337465,0.000029079174,0.47027335,0.0027651743,0.0020115734,0.0000034406758,0.00012733761,0.10005072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05320306,0.4788703,0.0007896579,0.45732078,0.0013489615,0.0006239994,0.000019891308,0.000045490655,0.0077778487],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961236,0.0015231626,0.0007309965,0.00034879486,0.0006819646,0.00059146225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624246,0.002145087,0.0002901439,0.00072565465,0.00022889547,0.000367745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063835434,0.00018515582,0.000494106,0.000016011958,0.00068819034,0.00004547825,0.00055731885,0.00015533039,0.0018126023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036180348,0.0000983098,0.00012804139,0.00039083278,0.0005594651,0.00084464456,0.00018934223,0.0009548755,0.0039320816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009943526,0.00004377643,0.0005774727,0.0028266634,0.000021916305,0.000008780268,0.0013245795,8.573445e-7,0.000001084711,0.45503473,0.50235593,0.03779428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001924249,0.000076768425,0.000046792546,0.01025542,0.00010399554,0.000005338088,0.0022756543,0.00002069776,0.0000024287374,0.005557821,0.9813381,0.00012459133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082486245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007574249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47898215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007177663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038003497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}