{"meta":{"query_hash":"20da4b3277f9","filters":{"venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly"},"cohort_total":81,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":81,"exported":81,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/20da4b3277f9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Administrative+Science+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1602099217","doi":"10.2189/asqu.51.1.1","title":"Emotional Intelligence, Cognitive Intelligence, and Job Performance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Emotional Intelligence and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":852,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Emotional intelligence; Psychology; Organizational citizenship behavior; Task (project management); Cognition; Human intelligence; Job performance; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Test (biology); Job analysis; Applied psychology; Organizational commitment; Management; Developmental psychology; Job satisfaction","score_opus":0.05996883226498805,"score_gpt":0.3673444317191438,"score_spread":0.30737559945415577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602099217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885888,0.0007933796,0.00036210072,0.0002869817,0.000015438118,0.0000050630915,0.000035425463,0.0000092060645,0.00990368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913067,0.00023902884,0.00015607514,0.000029890474,0.000016285952,0.0000026257815,0.000032114625,0.0000010315238,0.00039215645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996295,0.00014050593,0.000018077872,0.00004164961,0.000088311666,0.00008196951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955781,0.0019220954,0.0015086097,0.00015595833,0.00026298262,0.00057222205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007670036,0.00033744206,0.0001528428,0.00082969747,0.00031240936,0.0012397162,0.00017626499,0.00027657027,0.0021912854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067805615,0.00007719924,0.000118993405,0.00062768767,0.00064805447,0.00043812956,0.00071204116,0.00045358873,0.00023821283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018125963,0.0005985112,0.9317164,0.00009052171,0.000119900855,0.00018037931,0.0012330029,0.0011403841,0.00078883953,0.0029902551,0.00059767585,0.060362846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005401364,0.00013283807,0.9955711,0.000022278535,0.00003319261,0.00012822505,0.00033066943,0.0005325165,0.00020815637,0.00220571,0.0008196496,0.000010378123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010986814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012664486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021912854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019905005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019037248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007330537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848478910","doi":"10.2189/asqu.51.4.560","title":"Social Structure and Exchange: Self-confirming Dynamics in Hollywood","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social exchange theory; Hollywood; Preference; Promotion (chess); Microeconomics; Box office; Business; Industrial organization; Social media; Marketing; Economics; Advertising; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012460840940124663,"score_gpt":0.25548068012009445,"score_spread":0.24301983917996978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848478910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98816013,0.00015621852,0.00046615177,0.0002225218,0.0000035552066,0.000018320638,0.00004108169,0.0000054524216,0.010926617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986051,0.00006330235,0.00016855597,0.00002413556,0.000005569313,0.0000067332876,0.00004371732,0.000002634463,0.00108027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983918,0.00066638895,0.00005496034,0.0002216288,0.00034588476,0.00031925898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98436666,0.0073837666,0.005364079,0.0010040667,0.0007565603,0.0011248923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025992116,0.00016968574,0.00027164962,0.0024947275,0.0025375506,0.003192577,0.0008202329,0.0005411163,0.005743087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011210528,0.00019275132,0.0001512476,0.0023854815,0.0028017766,0.0029435793,0.0021251645,0.0006163415,0.00034389962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005504826,0.0008095862,0.7503129,0.00013275251,0.00009194506,0.0010661589,0.098546654,0.0013975021,0.0014678466,0.05803298,0.0022855748,0.08530562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032211523,0.00015528471,0.9308199,0.000047113786,0.000025835903,0.00020321317,0.04251588,0.002351242,0.00047529177,0.010969808,0.01237365,0.000030510582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017540032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028195929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017540032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022760981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075310015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03487587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941781419","doi":"10.2189/asqu.50.4.536","title":"Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":633,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Syndicate; Underwriting; Interpersonal ties; General partnership; Investment banking; Business; Investment (military); Microeconomics; Public relations; Social psychology; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.046942017952315944,"score_gpt":0.2920845706477968,"score_spread":0.24514255269548085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941781419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855769,0.00013479203,0.0034605083,0.00050934596,0.0000054610773,0.000011916799,0.00002017948,0.000013189122,0.010267795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936026,0.000024690362,0.00017519723,0.00001235514,0.000002214694,0.0000016675922,0.0000068028326,8.135609e-7,0.00041583693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987161,0.0005640219,0.000057382065,0.00016256848,0.0002730435,0.00022689853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98888105,0.004293252,0.0035934295,0.00042502853,0.00082695077,0.0019802623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00362388,0.00021008171,0.00023550917,0.0010849191,0.0012111356,0.0033038745,0.0004911691,0.0008484133,0.0036611333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016539063,0.00014345493,0.00018805079,0.000550513,0.0024292944,0.002184335,0.0019639528,0.0008920702,0.0003969818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005662279,0.0007487442,0.82254386,0.00009290955,0.00009124722,0.0010466046,0.012027829,0.017467305,0.0022777936,0.06750203,0.0009114659,0.07472402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012642547,0.0013135348,0.6939044,0.0001626304,0.00015205704,0.0010652739,0.033483,0.09493568,0.0029727262,0.16314895,0.008531962,0.00020337974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01063869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129564935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01063869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021276819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007376106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02115351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993954029","doi":"10.1177/0001839214560743","title":"To Hive or to Hold? Producing Professional Authority through Scut Work","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Jurisdiction; Bureaucracy; Deference; Work (physics); Identity (music); Task (project management); Relevance (law); Business; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.04508583923096362,"score_gpt":0.31851803528359535,"score_spread":0.27343219605263175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993954029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8586726,0.0012054975,0.016105926,0.012009569,0.00014275705,0.000058549667,0.000012298137,0.00014016179,0.11165262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527717,0.00015778755,0.0010060453,0.00034557568,0.000016695043,0.000009806005,0.000003899529,0.000016057915,0.003166948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98226213,0.011000351,0.00034434223,0.0009448343,0.0026560875,0.002792262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97963834,0.008906209,0.002889912,0.0022395405,0.0015400352,0.0047860094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010099197,0.00039159448,0.00036299558,0.0018809653,0.017631097,0.011507559,0.0015089586,0.0018772797,0.0049074166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025409212,0.0004045368,0.00035067272,0.0011779021,0.04232925,0.007304178,0.013364734,0.002973084,0.0008596175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009496155,0.000112414215,0.0187704,0.000105891304,0.000013369528,0.001159406,0.8480998,0.00026114887,0.002397452,0.07749513,0.00234263,0.049147412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039724488,0.00019882293,0.016403113,0.0005559502,0.000022140242,0.0012505522,0.8250699,0.0013692601,0.0024488359,0.059985615,0.09256866,0.00008743827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015653713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019446867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017631097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005189127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00957468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05341035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033844168","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.4.555","title":"Ambiguity and the Equity of Rating Systems: United States Brokerage Firms, 1995–2000","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Intermediary; Underwriting; Equity (law); Business; Rating system; Accounting; Actuarial science; Economics; Marketing; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03156842602508778,"score_gpt":0.2865257714969768,"score_spread":0.254957345471889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033844168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99396014,0.0006178793,0.00021728163,0.0009442754,0.000012361015,0.000009810164,0.0001544503,0.0000042389647,0.004079581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995091,0.00005452415,0.00003868517,0.00003301407,0.000011344356,0.0000015614913,0.000121499994,7.639092e-7,0.0002296345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979473,0.00043468442,0.00021464821,0.00020309156,0.0008781031,0.00032224265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94218016,0.014252357,0.034698136,0.0014561705,0.0055033285,0.0019099355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005731216,0.00015195578,0.00019874432,0.0014306866,0.0009583425,0.0033627367,0.0005721432,0.0008247909,0.001147201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044602077,0.00016923687,0.00013530438,0.0021251724,0.0009413254,0.0021194215,0.0010835433,0.001558904,0.00016620591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041731456,0.00015695224,0.96812314,0.000014705856,0.000060092807,0.000144251,0.0026602799,0.001221352,0.00031012567,0.0060801827,0.0026975272,0.018113984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023838711,0.00006587894,0.99192435,0.000020261734,0.000019084999,0.000082673905,0.0011943742,0.001982114,0.00038054376,0.0014603002,0.002829106,0.000017538014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031939067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036644563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031939067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003322049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061119784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063506305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037021923","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.680","title":"David Strang: Learning by Example: Imitation and Innovation at a Global Bank","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Imitation; Psychology; Sociology; Economic geography; Management; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0351278808786331,"score_gpt":0.2918382416843101,"score_spread":0.256710360805677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037021923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026929967,0.05539483,0.030893076,0.7069416,0.0030292093,0.00004060816,0.00028363033,0.00029321772,0.1761939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.715456,0.060001433,0.01816806,0.03648418,0.0034650546,0.00013086635,0.00019029032,0.0003416488,0.16576242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988298,0.00064298575,0.0000335114,0.00011531067,0.00025035682,0.00012810985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528545,0.003597109,0.0001758621,0.00012828046,0.00042455803,0.00038885654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016342002,0.000552801,0.00045710953,0.0016900572,0.002859858,0.0053120037,0.0014325987,0.009162798,0.014436137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010044126,0.0003386322,0.0002715476,0.0025088668,0.00510689,0.012806617,0.0021141737,0.004171906,0.0021089572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005283048,0.000031500495,0.00088475714,0.0001552509,0.00002746597,0.00046290518,0.0031866706,0.0020501467,0.00012227867,0.6648469,0.29026937,0.037909944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029620816,0.000014382879,0.00093215995,0.00024564916,0.000020373238,0.00019821826,0.0034210829,0.003633788,0.00067907205,0.78051937,0.2102354,0.000070897506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024475481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03144247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024475481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027895467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018004777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04866606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045607848","doi":"10.2307/2666982","title":"Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What You Do Depend on How You Do it","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Psychology; Social psychology; Outcome (game theory); Self construal; Proxy (statistics); Social exchange theory; Construals; Construal level theory; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.037525569552644626,"score_gpt":0.3511167034453518,"score_spread":0.31359113389270715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045607848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89251864,0.0024932679,0.018785879,0.004630442,0.00031286202,0.0000878569,0.00016776523,0.000043078653,0.08096005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968591,0.000330805,0.0016130705,0.00041386246,0.000058460082,0.000049831655,0.000029661607,0.00002176988,0.000623391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862055,0.009688641,0.0005159015,0.0010259808,0.0019363074,0.000627674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538565,0.026409771,0.010472842,0.004223571,0.0027058786,0.0023314054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009646495,0.00039117286,0.00040815925,0.0011305861,0.0014535873,0.0033655104,0.0004622188,0.00093790866,0.0024749036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051126994,0.00026973645,0.0005045355,0.00095204613,0.006434194,0.0026641404,0.0029592968,0.002074467,0.00022719885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020507833,0.0009856254,0.5763318,0.0008769477,0.0013638603,0.0004123992,0.06331763,0.0045121154,0.014063349,0.13529375,0.0032200294,0.19757174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014382572,0.00095171266,0.793024,0.0006236655,0.00050731434,0.00047985587,0.022146564,0.004265654,0.006513452,0.15078355,0.020220673,0.00033974624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019291663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023935896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009646495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012527471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012144783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051016152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051037209","doi":"10.2307/2667019","title":"Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":759,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Perspective (graphical); Observational learning; Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.036237055963995124,"score_gpt":0.2849482451570221,"score_spread":0.24871118919302698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051037209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981371,0.00009352801,0.0035536492,0.00041550526,0.0000023908144,0.000010353036,0.000034599758,0.000011798072,0.014507276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987783,0.000030176208,0.0005013367,0.0000096831245,8.7582873e-7,0.000003344886,0.000014832265,0.0000027709618,0.0006587474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941957,0.00019419033,0.000018235945,0.000103554936,0.00010238109,0.00016214413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609023,0.0014439586,0.0010700289,0.00039578558,0.00039558992,0.00060443435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090759894,0.00013298435,0.0001542848,0.0009963324,0.0017547029,0.0029733146,0.00078731886,0.0005880713,0.0046556843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007100317,0.00015654677,0.00018588126,0.00106442,0.004355288,0.0039092028,0.0024286902,0.00059745467,0.00031195933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040669943,0.00032872168,0.6915279,0.00010745387,0.00005970098,0.0013541523,0.07916007,0.012286994,0.0052582426,0.07625679,0.00089617126,0.13235708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044924043,0.00027533184,0.7800472,0.0001749691,0.00005334618,0.00045386347,0.09872123,0.018477123,0.0028322232,0.07880052,0.020011852,0.000107450374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056101833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.120334715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056101833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004305698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026548353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11155057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054837157","doi":"10.2307/3556618","title":"It's All in the Name: Failure-Induced Learning by Multiunit Chains","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Component (thermodynamics); Standardization; Investment (military); Knowledge management; Business; Organizational learning; Chain (unit); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.05399375661203395,"score_gpt":0.3023876095679247,"score_spread":0.24839385295589075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054837157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757184,0.00012554017,0.010733142,0.0011580947,0.00001246361,0.000043018015,0.000034099736,0.00003479316,0.012140502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997758,0.000047902853,0.0010983415,0.00005327859,0.000005115781,0.00002517766,0.000016989425,0.0000056936765,0.0009896006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648535,0.001751747,0.00012844111,0.0004567712,0.00058306375,0.00059464126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.956721,0.020979382,0.01122189,0.005821029,0.0025715951,0.0026851827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066321823,0.0003822482,0.00048917567,0.0010966355,0.001663689,0.0032011045,0.0015863003,0.0016045145,0.004675028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036387954,0.0002577979,0.0006210796,0.0012728646,0.0066630207,0.005009542,0.003463486,0.001720507,0.00038679707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009880539,0.0015092944,0.54073584,0.00030102747,0.0002720636,0.0015870569,0.04677162,0.0514584,0.0058033615,0.1794546,0.0033033008,0.16781537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024436653,0.0010303067,0.29538855,0.00024119791,0.0002657255,0.00065021263,0.02860476,0.11849793,0.0053104395,0.53740764,0.012091618,0.00026720655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017896095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020011846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017896095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050889403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029209827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03692299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062742765","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.324","title":"Matthew Gill: Accountants' Truth: Knowledge and Ethics in the Financial World.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.028409747335773287,"score_gpt":0.3070048141338246,"score_spread":0.2785950667980513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062742765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001113969,0.17197481,0.0015488724,0.7767734,0.0089741945,0.000023421258,0.00022580514,0.00009284726,0.039272673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1791553,0.23017694,0.007866629,0.34602803,0.038204473,0.00015522924,0.00044173168,0.00026119137,0.19771048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677926,0.0014810198,0.00021431645,0.00025356346,0.0010168406,0.00025499007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941585,0.0035795537,0.00045729295,0.00023136487,0.0011554984,0.0004177121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034711952,0.0007610712,0.0005051907,0.0027483094,0.0030522093,0.005171753,0.0015550635,0.012981899,0.010420045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01599416,0.00049253996,0.000390761,0.0025215729,0.0060102954,0.010427063,0.0028223821,0.0073891063,0.0030051703],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029074212,0.000010140811,0.00025549185,0.0001448082,0.000010389316,0.00017530836,0.0013049521,0.00008434143,0.000054519252,0.08792503,0.8909167,0.019089147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021329794,0.000014284028,0.002171932,0.0011910653,0.000016189042,0.00035644742,0.0022842088,0.00029000174,0.0003143952,0.17520952,0.8180821,0.00004850101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022151733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037032787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99694777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032528483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035316716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044045627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069347445","doi":"10.1177/0001839212447181","title":"Falling Flat","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Upstream (networking); Downstream (manufacturing); Possession (linguistics); Industrial organization; Business; Emerging technologies; Competition (biology); Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.2002138491875469,"score_gpt":0.46763061151402974,"score_spread":0.2674167623264828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069347445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032646313,0.00081065606,0.009764653,0.004143438,0.00090217846,0.00017913655,0.0025747677,0.00072291965,0.94825584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27919158,0.0011381925,0.0049190414,0.004012202,0.00025211874,0.0001820126,0.0043974235,0.0003787757,0.7055287],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989692,0.00012407472,0.0000447375,0.00023670313,0.00034512024,0.00028016028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990491,0.00010228206,0.000105258274,0.00019708354,0.00032132695,0.00022486663],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006756892,0.00070348923,0.00054456014,0.0014009412,0.0031599475,0.0035217348,0.0013135931,0.0017928676,0.30853632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030732534,0.00029677426,0.0006134426,0.0015378682,0.0012198624,0.003391314,0.0032723323,0.0015156816,0.104749866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000299596,0.00028963163,0.023436751,0.00031049002,0.000056563364,0.0016767014,0.0037297984,0.0007658284,0.0015213586,0.25634292,0.27989963,0.43167076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022901826,0.00011946033,0.010863542,0.00012799709,0.000017497654,0.00086938386,0.00297232,0.00069606677,0.00037936296,0.03476084,0.94913685,0.000033722405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009740077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124855125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30853632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013299272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014597629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087142893","doi":"10.2307/3094849","title":"Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":906,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Organizational identification; Identification (biology); Identity (music); Beauty; Psychology; Social psychology; Health care; Organizational commitment; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03193757728052814,"score_gpt":0.31316434370940566,"score_spread":0.2812267664288775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087142893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992212,0.000033431494,0.000051316525,0.00018580607,0.0000014709913,0.000001929387,0.0000029259788,4.9072827e-7,0.0005014719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99985707,0.0000123437285,0.000035120745,0.000022573277,0.0000031019747,0.0000013655401,0.0000030432711,3.405097e-7,0.000065033506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740136,0.0017292082,0.000074986194,0.00010840573,0.00042542128,0.00026062984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96909505,0.014778532,0.009698457,0.0011390521,0.0014785898,0.0038102577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033668657,0.000119521166,0.00014842012,0.0005964635,0.0010768243,0.0011524447,0.00026337412,0.0004140851,0.00164193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025220402,0.00014501868,0.00020466316,0.0003242426,0.0016772258,0.00069765863,0.001161713,0.00068334147,0.00015239777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017479924,0.00024714717,0.98457646,0.000008689595,0.00002256977,0.00012584327,0.004005474,0.00012728175,0.00032198516,0.0003266941,0.00016945468,0.009893583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009930957,0.00020759462,0.9914556,0.00000855339,0.000012966797,0.00018020246,0.0067920494,0.00057287945,0.00016751574,0.00026540368,0.00031859253,0.000008590709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045040846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007718899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045040846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006766536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008949162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017805934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089576145","doi":"10.2307/3094807","title":"Capitalizing on Diversity: Interpersonal Congruence in Small Work Groups","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":609,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Moderation; Categorization; Diversity (politics); Interpersonal relationship; Working group; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.19851049917267197,"score_gpt":0.32610178718956667,"score_spread":0.1275912880168947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089576145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99419135,0.00010360712,0.001160596,0.00019267808,0.000009749166,0.000013552439,0.000007936953,0.000003833648,0.004316573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996941,0.0000200095,0.0001858373,0.000012577337,0.000010448041,0.000005913099,0.0000044020353,8.43248e-7,0.00006589677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575555,0.0027334837,0.00011422643,0.00028991248,0.0007270732,0.00037981724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97537076,0.012665993,0.0070646885,0.0015329953,0.0008672334,0.0024983147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041684466,0.000258952,0.00034731667,0.0012204144,0.0015610972,0.0018829645,0.0003992207,0.00034156602,0.0015375394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02613686,0.00015406105,0.00022616984,0.00069125986,0.0020727303,0.0012839143,0.0033932598,0.00071783963,0.0001380087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064766634,0.0009843443,0.8105507,0.0001392714,0.00016814983,0.0005100812,0.067340866,0.0008476277,0.009207565,0.008255195,0.00047523374,0.10087324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006285247,0.0011917134,0.94445664,0.000088194356,0.00009586143,0.0003317538,0.025081966,0.002694057,0.0025760839,0.020795498,0.0025835459,0.000041827745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007234597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088253483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041684466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000614708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000665124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022045135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098099463","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268","title":"The Rationalization of Charity: The Influences of Professionalism in the Nonprofit Sector","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":866,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Champion; Bureaucracy; Public relations; Audit; Business; Sociology; Management; Political science; Accounting; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08537535005882686,"score_gpt":0.4213336287727662,"score_spread":0.33595827871393935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098099463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980122,0.000033932338,0.00009966765,0.00026379613,0.0000021689405,0.000006943483,0.000011931051,0.0000013365794,0.0015680029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999816,0.000014806937,0.000034297784,0.000016219692,0.0000030615054,0.0000028493293,0.000013116856,7.756778e-7,0.00009878745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925248,0.004736461,0.0002808137,0.000370131,0.0011929251,0.00089494296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92208666,0.029663738,0.031256944,0.003848252,0.0051132436,0.00803118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006629129,0.00009928405,0.00016854182,0.001590305,0.0014857408,0.0028203751,0.0003689521,0.00035573862,0.0010201484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032074627,0.00015098261,0.00017427011,0.0009505733,0.0031099115,0.0010110553,0.0021106538,0.001087891,0.00014154882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012318806,0.00012506274,0.97547895,0.0000101221585,0.000014036656,0.00007005983,0.013372914,0.00012842569,0.00019285509,0.001160892,0.00020345426,0.009119913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006891823,0.00006564146,0.9781568,0.000020234433,0.00000417191,0.00008962751,0.019151852,0.00040557986,0.00013885567,0.0007522778,0.0011964532,0.00001156681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013702683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017540518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013702683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029792476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027725275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035058558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098551983","doi":"10.1177/0001839215576401","title":"Concealable Stigma and Occupational Segregation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Lesbian; Stigma (botany); Psychology; Independence (probability theory); Social psychology; Occupational segregation; Social stigma; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1527958952661586,"score_gpt":0.4591924982008606,"score_spread":0.306396602934702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098551983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877721,0.00047834637,0.0009737549,0.0013807185,0.00001819585,0.000010831344,0.000047626792,0.0000029660198,0.009315417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939036,0.0001417086,0.00009646099,0.000060215294,0.0000119126325,0.000004006281,0.000016967473,7.080569e-7,0.00027775057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980521,0.00082023995,0.00010041324,0.00017864697,0.00040017065,0.0004484448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947973,0.0013038077,0.0023856082,0.0005115175,0.00029650252,0.00070529204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015212353,0.0001419267,0.00029481517,0.0014775617,0.002817544,0.0016658407,0.00031257948,0.00048390235,0.0045537376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010357823,0.00013747899,0.00021875018,0.0012499385,0.0031375505,0.001137696,0.0035003885,0.00072925416,0.00026822416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010933677,0.00019709526,0.9102489,0.00005091503,0.000035937075,0.0002968382,0.017960392,0.000417783,0.0004254741,0.02641344,0.0008617626,0.0429821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001642339,0.00009196031,0.93016297,0.00027082773,0.000020986454,0.00047229638,0.031874347,0.0012242026,0.00032443088,0.029250445,0.006265918,0.000025159594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010652636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015109347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010652636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011421154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014462748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021181226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110649000","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35","title":"Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; CONTEST; Legitimacy; Rhetoric; Element (criminal law); Sociology; Teleology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.036125156971147716,"score_gpt":0.3024322837532248,"score_spread":0.2663071267820771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110649000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057683002,0.00822084,0.15174793,0.036042776,0.00107891,0.00016923537,0.00008962627,0.00028961047,0.7446781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666364,0.0014269449,0.018106304,0.0015903044,0.0006827647,0.00019414656,0.000061926694,0.00014514002,0.01115617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674333,0.0071432483,0.00049925107,0.0013752175,0.0034266408,0.0008122903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97380507,0.019463064,0.0017210363,0.0022682415,0.002231513,0.0005110993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013431143,0.0008306064,0.0006484409,0.0074000536,0.0068316893,0.013412174,0.0021707697,0.0040632198,0.005437635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031045035,0.00046162566,0.00065252295,0.002769311,0.051002596,0.016460732,0.0066701034,0.0043124864,0.000920896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004215288,0.0000037552988,0.000099060126,0.000020902391,0.0000021403498,0.00003871412,0.0052415803,0.00007005382,0.00009522886,0.99141145,0.00035476353,0.002658008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020737778,0.00002139884,0.00022204692,0.00016037091,0.0000118766075,0.00021693858,0.0044574863,0.00094011123,0.0006772675,0.90430975,0.088943906,0.0000180664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009907731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079234806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013431143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060542524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026913788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07103157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113362774","doi":"10.2307/4131489","title":"The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":895,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Corporate governance; Shareholder value; Shareholder; Value (mathematics); Accounting; Business; Decoupling (probability); Finance","score_opus":0.018611682072025633,"score_gpt":0.2759588488763144,"score_spread":0.25734716680428876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113362774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989322,0.00007294374,0.00008482581,0.000044268952,4.852136e-7,0.0000012602886,0.000009965479,6.469758e-7,0.0008534436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982834,0.00004620062,0.000029390603,0.000006203064,8.2670846e-7,5.2422854e-7,0.000012505297,3.1463745e-7,0.000075613774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990984,0.00025354288,0.000063590785,0.00012126998,0.00020829866,0.00025485677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340785,0.0024275417,0.0028322325,0.0004733542,0.00039110144,0.0004678704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017566961,0.00010724684,0.00018412907,0.0018150692,0.00058508164,0.002371076,0.0002971766,0.00043235588,0.0008499322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069134105,0.00014468002,0.000099400764,0.0018773789,0.0024248024,0.0016700339,0.0015748093,0.00046092828,0.00007711551],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023031981,0.00007062875,0.8566807,0.00007408877,0.00007703073,0.00038175494,0.08238171,0.0005349142,0.0049786526,0.011882653,0.000246261,0.042461373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008420309,0.0000668914,0.9613679,0.000028984992,0.000023183506,0.00021851007,0.031816673,0.0004901486,0.0005691401,0.0021911825,0.0031943116,0.000024503737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009104319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011516609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009104319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012014696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043463774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018102646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117951367","doi":"10.2307/2667124","title":"Institutional Sources of Practice Variation: Staffing College and University Recycling Programs","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Variation (astronomy); Duty; Business; Population; Public relations; Political science; Public administration; Management; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02610007751126377,"score_gpt":0.25762229237611056,"score_spread":0.23152221486484678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117951367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925297,0.00042324507,0.0020871044,0.00064648327,0.000028605791,0.000065061875,0.00010837284,0.000026716525,0.0040846406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921405,0.000046067027,0.00038815587,0.0000847611,0.000007786744,0.000025480547,0.00005292224,0.000009053056,0.00017176726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581787,0.023732524,0.0033271217,0.0047151325,0.00770871,0.0023378725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83528554,0.09531884,0.030229034,0.017819269,0.01484435,0.0065029575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02109577,0.00013827004,0.00035647055,0.0038327568,0.0017170568,0.0026496488,0.0014428406,0.0007711969,0.0017507201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11340751,0.00033875412,0.00024128385,0.0040278095,0.0032904577,0.0012885052,0.0038090097,0.00082607457,0.00017909745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019941991,0.00019447923,0.8441194,0.00014627364,0.00016023428,0.0001691072,0.06733717,0.00050828175,0.0007793315,0.0045285053,0.0014029907,0.08045471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026032882,0.00019683389,0.9280299,0.00015966034,0.000034746263,0.00024084645,0.060880512,0.0009699075,0.00064284675,0.0028345962,0.005927493,0.00005659682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009887536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011527612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02109577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00379886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031104346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111566424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123734257","doi":"10.1177/0001839215589813","title":"Place and Institutional Work","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Process (computing); Political science; Social science; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.04779860323548296,"score_gpt":0.2727015033691405,"score_spread":0.22490290013365755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123734257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34358415,0.0064020683,0.023748375,0.01353172,0.00035263278,0.000086093925,0.00019638785,0.00009999897,0.6119985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350935,0.00080137653,0.0011583667,0.00019973946,0.00004322706,0.000018509181,0.000023846902,0.000013814222,0.0042316476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551755,0.0024881777,0.00019704422,0.00038251566,0.00051357836,0.00090111996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947048,0.0018605624,0.00094954536,0.00080764975,0.00032099138,0.0013563926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026162872,0.00027346058,0.00030103108,0.002476195,0.0071793627,0.01034157,0.0011705223,0.0013749426,0.0099178925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005305663,0.00022517682,0.00035769778,0.0031781632,0.045358602,0.006416142,0.0109124,0.0013654215,0.0007117643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032688564,0.0000362645,0.008820014,0.00012479229,0.000012263437,0.00028149557,0.057735737,0.00045105422,0.00017932903,0.90427226,0.0013393788,0.026714802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003202946,0.00012591944,0.023362137,0.0008212114,0.000034179764,0.00074525794,0.27499148,0.0005966645,0.0004069434,0.39934412,0.299466,0.00007403368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011231686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013841743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011231686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004886933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044288235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035457373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125381863","doi":"10.2307/3556680","title":"Why Firms Want to Organize Efficiently and what Keeps Them from Doing So: Inappropriate Governance, Performance, and Adaptation in a Deregulated Industry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Transport and Economic Policies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Industrial organization; Transaction cost; Business; Adaptation (eye); Deregulation; Process (computing); Database transaction; Microeconomics; Economics; Market economy; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.02152260236905314,"score_gpt":0.22298377590164128,"score_spread":0.20146117353258813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125381863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99464464,0.00005105928,0.001229459,0.00077693415,0.0000027733179,0.000008791206,0.000008522176,0.000006178736,0.0032717027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967444,0.000020425574,0.0001211661,0.000031474057,0.0000023116143,0.000002447863,0.0000052092737,0.0000012550136,0.00014130173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984018,0.0007101052,0.00006878051,0.00017311447,0.00021263697,0.0004334527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941302,0.0011311058,0.0024963077,0.0008928244,0.00057995913,0.0007695937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021926945,0.000111879664,0.00022256655,0.00058985496,0.0008208401,0.002846681,0.0003696217,0.0007464692,0.000980513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008672636,0.00013260485,0.00016103014,0.0007572525,0.0034322469,0.0024700712,0.0015001713,0.0006089488,0.00015415878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040925032,0.00056138803,0.7738192,0.000053965818,0.00009810811,0.0008983986,0.013224441,0.034049485,0.0063512763,0.09831054,0.0015384674,0.07068549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007179642,0.00028924912,0.81192094,0.000037890895,0.000033552667,0.00025763642,0.020254783,0.03303604,0.0019628312,0.12638034,0.005694713,0.000060259372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004467625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005065023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004467625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018612524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077869237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013504446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126885704","doi":"10.1177/0001839213475800","title":"Punctuated Generosity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":290,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Punctuated equilibrium; Context (archaeology); Generosity; Natural experiment; Politics; Community cohesion; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Political economy; History; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04759420767085416,"score_gpt":0.36029800798053335,"score_spread":0.3127038003096792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126885704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87968,0.00037256282,0.013968742,0.0020343375,0.00009226705,0.00009412311,0.00021953222,0.000079344914,0.103459135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740547,0.000037887356,0.0006625005,0.00009913626,0.000018139172,0.000022910148,0.000021516162,0.0000060253656,0.0017263424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975198,0.0011666329,0.00007762321,0.00043509822,0.00030787245,0.00049292814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912493,0.0029094047,0.0018771582,0.0020596434,0.00046635745,0.001438002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003578175,0.0001712138,0.00027338942,0.0010229805,0.0016116797,0.0024201262,0.00058989914,0.0006389974,0.009917485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012795463,0.00015411072,0.0002555114,0.0007705013,0.003655933,0.0020745962,0.0059776916,0.00084673427,0.00048265603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066813006,0.00030070657,0.2244688,0.0002162878,0.00013338703,0.0016723949,0.03986151,0.0031812266,0.0047245002,0.5519107,0.005419552,0.16744275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015819643,0.0007726208,0.26210433,0.00026803522,0.00009503003,0.0031405769,0.03514142,0.006762375,0.0033579366,0.5632939,0.12478096,0.0001246848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038344768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083152624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009917485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012029095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008088498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033177316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132639594","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.379","title":"Contentious Implementation and Retrenchment in Neoliberal Policy Reform: The Global Electric Power Industry, 1989–2001","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Economics; Liberalization; Opposition (politics); Market economy; Politics; Political economy; Economic system; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.03278852878649335,"score_gpt":0.34774716371398035,"score_spread":0.314958634927487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132639594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721557,0.0004975554,0.0005250273,0.0037939767,0.000011770774,0.000020877023,0.0000271836,0.0000060204034,0.022961892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987437,0.00011465304,0.00010299518,0.00020756251,0.0000117138625,0.0000076112065,0.000018059425,0.0000019468202,0.0007917811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981159,0.00079786114,0.00012734988,0.00025148253,0.00037151578,0.0003360452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880222,0.0051408247,0.0050656823,0.00058683445,0.0008734115,0.00031104364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045841774,0.00014627902,0.00021970796,0.0013534378,0.0015594349,0.0033337541,0.00042136275,0.0011251492,0.0019673673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021612002,0.0002069986,0.00017605133,0.0024385669,0.0055064373,0.003086489,0.0018371816,0.0016642656,0.00013579916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005745668,0.0008113056,0.38378668,0.00032756693,0.0001548518,0.0008988957,0.14964822,0.008877912,0.0026024047,0.33922312,0.003915682,0.109178856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095937314,0.00022843933,0.8277125,0.00019677832,0.00011287362,0.00013255204,0.049019948,0.005134714,0.0030118716,0.07245652,0.041838735,0.000059017795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020300535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02698862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020300535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074162213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002439452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05380869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132999934","doi":"10.2189/asqu.51.1.59","title":"Explaining Compassion Organizing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":703,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Improvisation; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Process (computing); Social psychology; Organizational theory; Sociology; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Management; Political science; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.024345802606934645,"score_gpt":0.2595330586864998,"score_spread":0.23518725607956514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132999934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20031705,0.0025262854,0.27741387,0.036726087,0.0004958518,0.00029677784,0.00010498099,0.00024539634,0.4818736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790025,0.0003387647,0.014246716,0.0012966995,0.000082985,0.0001550157,0.000042541393,0.000025979996,0.004808849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980305,0.0010118948,0.00006005324,0.00022502501,0.00027084112,0.00040174733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741554,0.001190775,0.00046939295,0.0003092574,0.00030588015,0.00030908347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025357758,0.00041749582,0.00024382099,0.0014141661,0.0031027158,0.0032024682,0.0013715115,0.0019092943,0.0061129727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054588527,0.0002751002,0.0007015644,0.0008927559,0.014087424,0.0036937094,0.004908561,0.0019694674,0.00052002433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011137319,0.000031579173,0.0023730255,0.000062593,0.000008672586,0.00025908594,0.015151313,0.001158578,0.00026566666,0.96883833,0.0016778252,0.010162268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002222046,0.000052573883,0.0025504958,0.0001540471,0.000011633758,0.0005361549,0.012252249,0.006243194,0.0004937317,0.92379415,0.053864226,0.000025370608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017462359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013687368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061129727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002365487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016115252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020449877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137503951","doi":"10.2189/asqu.53.4.655","title":"When Competence Is Irrelevant: The Role of Interpersonal Affect in Task-Related Ties","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Competence (human resources); Affect (linguistics); Feeling; Perception; Organizational behavior; Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.03285902203463769,"score_gpt":0.3468753780738802,"score_spread":0.3140163560392425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137503951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99176735,0.00009003091,0.0010067407,0.00016449229,0.000007055425,0.0000070095643,0.000016496633,0.000004715469,0.0069360686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972075,0.00001946237,0.00010839711,0.000025001882,0.0000070695114,0.00000289839,0.000012571004,0.0000022792397,0.00010150291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803776,0.0010693414,0.00009252477,0.0002573164,0.0003478673,0.00019518127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98186344,0.010387014,0.0042516342,0.0011233471,0.00062844367,0.0017461332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026453983,0.00025462886,0.00030624573,0.000691055,0.0013067898,0.0020799707,0.00031238998,0.000625364,0.0015548518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02185056,0.00019959206,0.0001578939,0.00040950012,0.0017646167,0.0017173103,0.0020731743,0.0010765223,0.00014529469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008315223,0.00057075557,0.88501805,0.00013577478,0.00014942035,0.00076229783,0.034283835,0.0014823572,0.011470237,0.0097584445,0.00056156825,0.054975744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016273641,0.00013539406,0.9828388,0.000026855221,0.000051369112,0.00028811547,0.0054854318,0.0021776748,0.000535133,0.007405912,0.0010100945,0.000028846694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010131989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015592048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026453983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046000892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023652427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013990402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138792223","doi":"10.1177/0001839214549042","title":"Imprint–environment Fit and Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imprinting (psychology); Psychology; Core (optical fiber); Resource (disambiguation); Social psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.029716603576351974,"score_gpt":0.24935710183751775,"score_spread":0.21964049826116577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138792223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992944,0.00003736993,0.00009504953,0.00006704825,0.0000023845776,0.0000027049396,0.000014340128,0.000001429243,0.00048536665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999666,0.00002072293,0.00006139901,0.000013485105,0.000001771638,0.0000029643986,0.00002411201,0.000001046658,0.00020840886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983165,0.00071386574,0.000073763724,0.00019306541,0.0002942759,0.00040848803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937425,0.0017806933,0.0017221625,0.00041026075,0.00049256015,0.0018517552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024337242,0.00019433559,0.00028185503,0.0009193413,0.0016752238,0.0020934567,0.00038442455,0.0005557731,0.0023726535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008970788,0.00024883862,0.0002533261,0.00072575506,0.0011457802,0.0011478864,0.002172702,0.001166829,0.0003936681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113654256,0.00064540264,0.97709435,0.000008675694,0.000028290458,0.00017593616,0.011809149,0.00013129368,0.00052319013,0.0003485623,0.00011817441,0.00900326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036533615,0.00026673052,0.9902728,0.000008749912,0.0000071530503,0.00010390941,0.008157831,0.00028055513,0.00022473799,0.00026028004,0.00039937723,0.000014229624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00818551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012577521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00818551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088222045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077504007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016275704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140296865","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2011.56.1.001","title":"The Ethical Dangers of Deliberative Decision Making","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":208,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Framing (construction); Ethical decision; Psychology; Normative; Deception; Social psychology; Altruism (biology); Embodied cognition; Feeling; Epistemology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.20328039873743134,"score_gpt":0.3809952807632362,"score_spread":0.17771488202580485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140296865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40806088,0.011884432,0.24806912,0.15193973,0.001143972,0.00020728195,0.000085392574,0.00026333187,0.17834586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96848047,0.0014525659,0.026088784,0.0025690089,0.00019410222,0.00014164222,0.000015964883,0.000034073844,0.0010234328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9473673,0.039585765,0.0014925278,0.0017529645,0.008681243,0.0011202102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8748621,0.097987816,0.010470177,0.0099161705,0.0048575965,0.0019061846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032355677,0.00064641086,0.00055642636,0.001440362,0.0020476815,0.0050972933,0.0009864795,0.003164094,0.0024144803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11080425,0.0006367972,0.00066347374,0.0005966358,0.02100214,0.0068890834,0.005062762,0.007010212,0.0004716842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051445083,0.00021354681,0.008403739,0.0006212934,0.00014414107,0.00048674323,0.013728131,0.0051194057,0.0042677727,0.87657595,0.00297464,0.0869502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065498556,0.00006001138,0.002912634,0.00023901208,0.000025621854,0.00033086783,0.0020043582,0.0034487941,0.0015232946,0.97863334,0.010712898,0.000043737808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033154592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004095692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032355677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017628303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022756215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17111522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141068531","doi":"10.1177/0001839214545277","title":"Portfolios of Political Ties and Business Group Strategy in Emerging Economies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics; Government (linguistics); Market economy; Business; Diversification (marketing strategy); Portfolio; Emerging markets; Corporate group; Political economy; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.030062416746941076,"score_gpt":0.28545733524289135,"score_spread":0.25539491849595025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141068531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99868983,0.000058243495,0.000081670645,0.000018597852,9.363264e-7,0.000004437543,0.00008996358,8.959771e-7,0.0010554136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995597,0.0000480296,0.000029263214,0.0000041343083,0.000001742744,0.00000387419,0.00018357678,5.066376e-7,0.00016910853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959856,0.000096703094,0.0000439214,0.00007286763,0.00008440162,0.000103557984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993933,0.0013041727,0.0032696426,0.00032553304,0.0003760247,0.00079151464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095071277,0.00015874472,0.00026717238,0.0025402796,0.0005702334,0.0012007024,0.00027949057,0.00028031974,0.0018831097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004770085,0.000105320854,0.00015256555,0.002695097,0.0005223241,0.0014208191,0.0018453819,0.0004594839,0.00023409788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026195916,0.00003852857,0.99379736,0.000006069502,0.0000236848,0.000085832755,0.0007576419,0.00024542728,0.0000778182,0.00042087847,0.00008489841,0.0044356016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037842685,0.000028597744,0.99630886,0.0000072413036,0.000010078312,0.00004311596,0.0019445844,0.00075651816,0.00006489674,0.00027566688,0.000553523,0.0000032048592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009005599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015285109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009005599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048039932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028190934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017906368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144657509","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32","title":"The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Conceptualization; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Sacrifice; Social psychology; Duty; Epistemology; Work (physics); Qualitative research; Centrality; Psychology; Law; Social science; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.019548644433912174,"score_gpt":0.34075458130988956,"score_spread":0.32120593687597737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144657509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750953,0.00043128128,0.00090103544,0.0046231626,0.000045857912,0.00001173297,0.000010268667,0.000008703758,0.018872641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990876,0.000061004182,0.0001338511,0.00020661295,0.0000056875188,0.000004681429,0.000002336271,0.0000031944123,0.0004951252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916099,0.0058553456,0.00020030301,0.0004031257,0.0009857018,0.0009456485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898431,0.0051303306,0.0015220525,0.00064272585,0.0005425661,0.0023192663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064914883,0.0002281279,0.00042465643,0.0014944403,0.013705725,0.004919328,0.00098548,0.001090443,0.0020607745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010451959,0.00031292115,0.00015139159,0.001189914,0.041373387,0.004808892,0.006782646,0.002535379,0.00011351947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020775957,0.00002438306,0.0082717175,0.000042504867,0.0000050774993,0.0002886722,0.9659697,0.000023026249,0.00037588034,0.018405564,0.0008161884,0.0057564285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035354765,0.00002036817,0.008372109,0.000056805216,0.0000025908657,0.00012097384,0.98035103,0.000036340294,0.000059392652,0.003193073,0.0077707125,0.000013004462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012347166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030846654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013705725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039885445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047603366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034330666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155232257","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189","title":"Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1063,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary-work; Work (physics); Boundary (topology); Agency (philosophy); Organizational field; Field (mathematics); Process (computing); Public relations; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Institutional theory; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.01419184045946153,"score_gpt":0.28357438982925226,"score_spread":0.2693825493697907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155232257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017374,0.0010813568,0.024170773,0.004959255,0.000038710365,0.00015770446,0.00003677768,0.000059494087,0.06775853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679935,0.0001270076,0.0021679385,0.00007537076,0.0000071327586,0.000034011813,0.000014183561,0.0000130957,0.0007617725],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762566,0.015811436,0.00079298834,0.0014378218,0.0035301028,0.00217095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9285831,0.045164395,0.008402703,0.007952289,0.0050195893,0.004877966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02176484,0.00026697913,0.0005831656,0.005989887,0.014866392,0.015852636,0.0021718908,0.001847535,0.0040685916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05258894,0.0005993981,0.0005047668,0.0041904994,0.052397132,0.010768733,0.0106102545,0.0027716905,0.00040554962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001112891,0.00040619075,0.085355006,0.00024264844,0.000038418326,0.000884425,0.5658391,0.0020618117,0.0012605526,0.25605994,0.00086556363,0.08687498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055349814,0.000220411,0.11068359,0.00066292926,0.0000312311,0.00060709554,0.5824237,0.003620051,0.0010696509,0.2487895,0.051696435,0.0001400709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027464602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027464602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0152174495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01711194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115104854},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2155448232","doi":"10.2189/asqu.53.2.266","title":"Bringing the Context Back In: Settings and the Search for Syndicate Partners in Venture Capital Investment Networks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":482,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Syndicate; Venture capital; Business; Investment (military); Context (archaeology); Maturity (psychological); Social venture capital; Popularity; Web syndication; Industrial organization; Finance; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.03748353399216502,"score_gpt":0.2888030205134176,"score_spread":0.2513194865212526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155448232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96792823,0.0017124339,0.0045867683,0.0040955525,0.000036414145,0.000042775442,0.00011908647,0.00001911982,0.021459524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989869,0.00023999209,0.00031510313,0.000056680958,0.000015196634,0.00000853776,0.000019104984,0.0000020365978,0.00035638182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977234,0.0012953333,0.00012460352,0.00041389692,0.00019870936,0.0002439393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97554773,0.011835,0.007502444,0.000917306,0.00068705535,0.0035104542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020538385,0.00022970505,0.00034084648,0.0027033829,0.0036541685,0.0077723423,0.0007481381,0.0014550727,0.008254486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026536234,0.0004615359,0.00023824372,0.0026874372,0.006689926,0.010640206,0.006640723,0.0019530014,0.0004964974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039218948,0.00030884254,0.62281954,0.00027886435,0.00012499138,0.0023311446,0.051449113,0.0039731045,0.0011935637,0.25751114,0.0027482978,0.056869153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020340778,0.0006016006,0.49544978,0.0008181788,0.00021832764,0.0039770543,0.12515105,0.012016824,0.0013292467,0.3162528,0.04380605,0.00017574047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034202358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053401724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008254486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001715708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007874641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027614057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157263331","doi":"10.1177/0001839215571125","title":"Marks of Distinction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Identity and Reputation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Novelty; Public relations; Framing effect; Sociology; Media studies; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07092482277787719,"score_gpt":0.2973860814538756,"score_spread":0.22646125867599837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157263331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008555298,0.003257375,0.015275239,0.028638028,0.0050200415,0.00009341729,0.00035123498,0.00016662695,0.93864274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5168751,0.0034090187,0.015795764,0.024914848,0.004500403,0.00039110563,0.0007143791,0.00052954303,0.43286985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944484,0.001642865,0.00034908432,0.0012418358,0.0016025492,0.00071526394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996021,0.0014450586,0.0003447302,0.0012243888,0.0006432931,0.00032160777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045850063,0.00042584093,0.0004120735,0.0014527937,0.0037792583,0.008875767,0.0015295015,0.0030510386,0.03402583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015227764,0.00022385943,0.0005125685,0.0013169948,0.010051273,0.008312657,0.006437035,0.005249067,0.010851212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015442078,0.000005328619,0.00034023705,0.000020952451,0.000002331336,0.00004274993,0.0024007987,0.000027920501,0.000092743525,0.9568398,0.02279281,0.017418822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055889063,0.000018746192,0.00049349805,0.00009326195,0.000003475003,0.00014771793,0.0014846483,0.00008389819,0.00020693042,0.16308138,0.8343717,0.000009085162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022534376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002314537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03402583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032457537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024196636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113827705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160344757","doi":"10.1177/0001839214523603","title":"When Does Prior Experience Pay? Institutional Experience and the Multinational Corporation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Internationalization; Experiential learning; Foreign direct investment; Business; Affect (linguistics); Investment (military); Institutional theory; Economics; Marketing; International trade; Finance; Political science; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.02178401121413357,"score_gpt":0.27899369203184293,"score_spread":0.25720968081770934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160344757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925932,0.0001740587,0.00022473157,0.00072114746,0.000011896647,0.0000057088632,0.000021705744,0.0000027157923,0.006244679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995179,0.00006272791,0.000025430461,0.000036375866,0.000008351804,0.0000015988995,0.000015171152,0.0000011616422,0.00033129152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882156,0.00040743066,0.00004858118,0.00009277493,0.00019950923,0.0004300696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855516,0.004341717,0.0035565426,0.0007288207,0.0009015798,0.004919681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001627088,0.000117309755,0.00017569614,0.0007741768,0.0009393928,0.0029576202,0.00045641727,0.0006069934,0.0053497627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01419888,0.00009978063,0.00014847334,0.0005862771,0.001902735,0.0021698715,0.0016169146,0.000854561,0.00031343056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017088371,0.00063913467,0.9415962,0.000030386727,0.000043121414,0.0006056369,0.0075372458,0.0005807243,0.0004770896,0.0049619004,0.00059299835,0.042764634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011313989,0.00023472583,0.9705296,0.0000748615,0.000013932207,0.00036386194,0.021472571,0.0004848091,0.0003071863,0.0032786403,0.0032029003,0.000025542247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040637353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071070604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053497627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010828834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000858937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017896712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168716590","doi":"10.1177/0001839213504403","title":"Whose Jobs Are These? The Impact of the Proportion of Female Managers on the Number of New Management Jobs Filled by Women versus Men","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Sample (material); Demographic economics; Inequality; Work (physics); Business; Point (geometry); Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.09454260233042987,"score_gpt":0.3621154520954224,"score_spread":0.2675728497649925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168716590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946784,0.00046240445,0.00008096091,0.0009494364,0.00003356618,0.000005079202,0.00007564544,0.000001983653,0.0037125472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.00012002848,0.00003666311,0.00012197413,0.000025233681,0.0000032524538,0.00003096886,0.0000016824258,0.00077623327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991912,0.00029462363,0.00002427821,0.00011303017,0.00011670324,0.0002601064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217767,0.0034633847,0.0019318968,0.00014969123,0.00026835073,0.0020090062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013711648,0.000112104564,0.00020464598,0.0004099647,0.0007433592,0.0010627498,0.00024635,0.00042325587,0.0074798474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074604745,0.00011400253,0.00022879182,0.00025295178,0.00054266833,0.0008887575,0.0004947315,0.0006515476,0.0007942811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029013192,0.00010192838,0.97509754,0.000023607307,0.00003826432,0.0001370617,0.0019514849,0.00007299047,0.000392587,0.0004945497,0.00072524097,0.02067464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000722603,0.00007035638,0.99336386,0.000018736158,0.000012263415,0.00006912696,0.005064239,0.000076007236,0.00009901846,0.00019028278,0.0010239971,0.000004836826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007042576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015108574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074798474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036039003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041953608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025022566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169034499","doi":"10.1177/0001839212466521","title":"Fatherhood and Managerial Style","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard Kennedy School; Aalborg Universitet; Louisiana State University; Northwestern University; National University of Singapore; York University; George Mason University","keywords":"Daughter; Psychology; Generosity; Chief executive officer; Parental leave; Danish; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Labour economics; Economics; Management; Political science; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11628485147733345,"score_gpt":0.35943317167717137,"score_spread":0.24314832019983793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169034499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938415,0.0003328518,0.00013314637,0.00015780446,0.000012949994,0.0000024172682,0.000045809025,0.0000022035395,0.0054713897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991555,0.00008398235,0.000045234363,0.000019471836,0.000007686868,8.095411e-7,0.000025306055,0.0000010895583,0.0006608597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993863,0.00025625134,0.000028679131,0.00007185709,0.00012838126,0.00012848045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995538,0.0011645583,0.0017614148,0.00020015628,0.00018680029,0.0011491416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009077114,0.00014491018,0.00016868106,0.00054316985,0.00062305835,0.0009841865,0.00018203964,0.0001759399,0.0055765025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004249748,0.00007568222,0.000094167,0.00039972202,0.0005305889,0.000319904,0.000589327,0.00033622858,0.00038061786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006150723,0.000070994836,0.9835495,0.000014201217,0.000036310168,0.0001978048,0.0029381316,0.0000998834,0.00034503493,0.001320021,0.000342062,0.011024631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048260226,0.00006996237,0.9952331,0.000015709644,0.000005875686,0.00017040373,0.0017297574,0.00009753646,0.00007242953,0.0005248592,0.0020710602,0.000004303699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016252293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044702045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055765025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028938233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020206104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01865524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315717040","doi":"10.1177/0001839216644253","title":"How Cinderella Became a Queen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Allusion; Sociology; Resistance (ecology); Product (mathematics); Object (grammar); Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Subcategory; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; History; Computer science; Literature; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.026050367622390276,"score_gpt":0.25229636415085355,"score_spread":0.22624599652846328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315717040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3086338,0.0007740621,0.002238816,0.026438959,0.000450378,0.00008141355,0.00007524009,0.00007778053,0.66122955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927856,0.0003103315,0.0009227523,0.0026281602,0.00005769876,0.00003291064,0.000035271216,0.0000760706,0.06808071],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981122,0.0009541693,0.0000191715,0.00023640467,0.0002191193,0.00045892096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918026,0.00027952687,0.00008281329,0.00012414996,0.0000913849,0.0002419364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020381575,0.00031729546,0.00019369791,0.0008180427,0.018479243,0.006346516,0.0012056028,0.002291254,0.011677139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003968864,0.00026721339,0.00024289938,0.00079394015,0.015426943,0.0042425077,0.0032190995,0.003102455,0.0013055041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004939782,0.000056963894,0.0045111515,0.000056811557,0.000004570933,0.003525218,0.61882937,0.00012821988,0.0004613563,0.33157805,0.021951804,0.018847119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016127386,0.000048847705,0.0060820985,0.00019051271,0.000009220587,0.0012993728,0.30499017,0.00036223105,0.00044107108,0.01955341,0.666964,0.000042993237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099822104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2085499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099822104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011946336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004068192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19848216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332088928","doi":"10.1177/0001839216639577","title":"Whitened Résumés","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":418,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; University of Toronto; Harvard University","keywords":"Seekers; Diversity (politics); Transparency (behavior); Disadvantage; Audit; Racism; Racial diversity; Social psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Equal employment opportunity; Inequality; Psychology; Sociology; Ethnic group; Political science; Economics; Law; Management; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.10433345886496954,"score_gpt":0.44905764401125764,"score_spread":0.3447241851462881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332088928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98852754,0.00009628335,0.0014395482,0.00029522838,0.00009095787,0.0001655846,0.00006434654,0.000056068307,0.009264476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799329,0.00011857887,0.0022188032,0.0004550405,0.000027915485,0.00013545866,0.000078851765,0.000027251273,0.01700514],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708205,0.0014999502,0.00021685193,0.0003167378,0.0005148428,0.00036964403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99099344,0.0033939187,0.0019623474,0.0018079507,0.00085095776,0.0009913974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032243978,0.00025440782,0.00023734251,0.00043579566,0.0018474577,0.0018806563,0.00051182986,0.0006156849,0.009491593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016210862,0.00016860887,0.00017260037,0.00026450603,0.0012724609,0.0014845832,0.0014790003,0.0010471357,0.0012688386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023251649,0.007113283,0.19227904,0.0007965554,0.000063214415,0.0030742271,0.33359993,0.0009362121,0.06588809,0.019432642,0.014456436,0.36003524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018347002,0.007981687,0.36108622,0.00071399024,0.000069563815,0.0021743171,0.3207751,0.002910857,0.03755064,0.009119885,0.25704655,0.00038775016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000721238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012957113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009491593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045972358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007030211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031752527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333911548","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2011.56.1.136","title":"Book Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08161205135956744,"score_gpt":0.35627128897040644,"score_spread":0.274659237610839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333911548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037374615,0.0703327,0.0012141898,0.04181391,0.043373015,0.00012822187,0.00095967005,0.00056950963,0.84123504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008785175,0.013722975,0.000238108,0.004760176,0.0050594253,0.000030833377,0.00031800105,0.00011074635,0.9748813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992637,0.00006989182,0.000018742543,0.00007939366,0.00050348893,0.00006475116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975884,0.00043145835,0.00009473861,0.00019370002,0.0012768805,0.00041478663],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007579304,0.0007061939,0.00080549275,0.0033904053,0.0015726725,0.0045889015,0.0011451265,0.0020822345,0.37862048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044387775,0.00036846,0.00046343272,0.004099976,0.0007816822,0.002679446,0.0014829019,0.0025782394,0.3321769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002881008,0.0000055203764,0.000019225881,0.000039216342,7.6958463e-7,0.0000070160186,0.0000061860546,0.000017675635,0.000018756278,0.0013336189,0.9655289,0.033020183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016641045,0.0000022650086,0.0000680587,0.00005477084,0.0000010819039,0.000012880652,0.000011755378,0.0000116660885,0.000012558907,0.0005840562,0.9992379,0.000001478147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006856329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020294832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37862048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023573134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037890505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8863225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409741560","doi":"10.1177/0001839216653712","title":"Explaining the Selection of Routines for Change during Organizational Search","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Interdependence; Organizational change; Politics; Planned change; Public relations; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.053716655633787774,"score_gpt":0.29317216446094674,"score_spread":0.23945550882715896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409741560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92668957,0.00053264416,0.015059079,0.002984215,0.000028530581,0.0001055138,0.000081136044,0.0000628604,0.054456394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954991,0.000104044106,0.002969478,0.00007235305,0.0000062082595,0.00002904331,0.00005936373,0.00002332868,0.0012370683],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960432,0.0016088155,0.00017950725,0.00046881108,0.0006726115,0.0010270132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870341,0.0054055476,0.0035210294,0.0011951195,0.00139014,0.0014539589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004770468,0.0004166295,0.0003651379,0.0028552767,0.0039891223,0.0064313067,0.0012202046,0.0017446282,0.0047106813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019734869,0.0006107704,0.00065243867,0.0019031876,0.0089459205,0.0050990297,0.0040702983,0.00122835,0.0005313547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000402753,0.00030733272,0.4455845,0.00038427772,0.000073006915,0.0010637187,0.30755225,0.004075182,0.00389184,0.15528083,0.0029880395,0.07839627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013583648,0.0003892614,0.5661628,0.00052954035,0.00010071211,0.0005081808,0.24467388,0.02138107,0.00166961,0.119031474,0.04516681,0.00025077382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07188808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08133561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07188808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008434816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060880994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14293933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529640113","doi":"10.1177/0001839216687743","title":"Not All Sparks Light a Fire: Stakeholder and Shareholder Reactions to Critical Events in Contested Markets","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Shareholder; Stakeholder; Business; Opposition (politics); Politics; Corporate social responsibility; Corporate governance; Event study; Stakeholder engagement; Shareholder value; Critical mass (sociodynamics); Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder analysis; Public relations; Economics; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.13727599150796735,"score_gpt":0.36894471189808575,"score_spread":0.2316687203901184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529640113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99335164,0.0001516601,0.00045827928,0.00075339817,0.00001636566,0.000022534761,0.00013212231,0.0000074635623,0.0051065804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992237,0.00007748162,0.00016435336,0.0001116408,0.000026562346,0.000014930153,0.000099777135,0.0000041376193,0.00027737394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980653,0.0009964881,0.000089385634,0.00021755426,0.00032674836,0.00030458445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97020906,0.017402727,0.009140017,0.0008318315,0.000916553,0.0014997934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031943135,0.00023999534,0.00029004688,0.0013537433,0.0015597852,0.0040667374,0.00050818775,0.0011925169,0.0030776146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024598027,0.00023511273,0.00023833597,0.0009334049,0.0016989157,0.0035762088,0.0025227088,0.0013654135,0.00031761054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009873726,0.0005275887,0.86093986,0.00023957813,0.0001684894,0.0014524506,0.076910034,0.0015794082,0.0038521057,0.009699211,0.0042211968,0.039422728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005522668,0.00022206336,0.8746306,0.00013612263,0.00006542912,0.00027766763,0.09479707,0.0059176283,0.0012613964,0.0104683405,0.012076399,0.00009219614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007004986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010570314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007004986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013484784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000605224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016893387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572215412","doi":"10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.171","title":"Mark Zachry and Charlotte Thralls: Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Discourse analysis; Political science; Public relations; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034565440417977385,"score_gpt":0.3310755013865231,"score_spread":0.2965100609685457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572215412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0305692,0.1362928,0.031195877,0.719638,0.004712062,0.0002403054,0.00042651835,0.00015092379,0.07677435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6217078,0.17709132,0.035142813,0.051555943,0.007545347,0.0009568336,0.00039322113,0.00036162543,0.10524516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624085,0.0020827744,0.0001653859,0.00033847446,0.0009013714,0.00027106106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98040205,0.014435783,0.00081303675,0.00039508575,0.0026974464,0.0012566455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007631842,0.001091945,0.00087653485,0.004074433,0.007796721,0.017024694,0.003069551,0.0106001785,0.008152993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018255102,0.00087620877,0.00059918227,0.0046969405,0.012982096,0.021858254,0.005755175,0.00751515,0.0013637467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012723572,0.00008596449,0.0009401545,0.00058846554,0.00003480906,0.000439253,0.09243587,0.00059345545,0.0004625606,0.73024935,0.14082965,0.033213172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012345002,0.000046442296,0.004813771,0.001704996,0.000097056945,0.00048019507,0.067399025,0.0017093495,0.0022604347,0.5206299,0.40050167,0.00023373787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040849816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05603917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040849816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045129876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005945151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081224084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595216221","doi":"10.1177/0001839217700352","title":"The Paradox of Breadth: The Tension between Experience and Legitimacy in the Transition to Entrepreneurship","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Variety (cybernetics); Entrepreneurship; Novelty; Resource (disambiguation); Marketing; Categorical variable; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Public relations; Economics; Psychology; Business; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10989328696481947,"score_gpt":0.3963315864783801,"score_spread":0.28643829951356065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595216221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95938694,0.00043179857,0.0062963986,0.00539008,0.00003480386,0.000020040035,0.000039651317,0.000013914436,0.028386304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992549,0.00003840105,0.00025523384,0.00010578972,0.000023691207,0.0000074843533,0.000008325483,0.0000037469315,0.00030232602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951885,0.002192854,0.00022628561,0.00064017024,0.0010683457,0.00068397337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9648255,0.023747766,0.004053972,0.0017979547,0.0012134459,0.004361331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006593028,0.00017434989,0.0004511969,0.0021682768,0.0024405248,0.005402253,0.0009482164,0.00142705,0.005688965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04395259,0.00028564615,0.0002764429,0.001162839,0.012411195,0.012441167,0.009538901,0.0031101494,0.00027327787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061532314,0.0006625363,0.31924838,0.00024527783,0.0000685059,0.0016777484,0.2263216,0.0008532542,0.0030940613,0.35666847,0.0013848151,0.08916001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014353279,0.0005362242,0.25153533,0.00043948056,0.00004657415,0.0019606345,0.14590894,0.0029295674,0.0010707335,0.5788685,0.016451782,0.00010864605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012449228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015529563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006593028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009497766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010329841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034867704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618376294","doi":"10.1177/0001839217712240","title":"The Acquisitive Nature of Extraverted CEOs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Extraversion and introversion; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Assertiveness; Big Five personality traits; Trait; Affect (linguistics); Discretion; Political science","score_opus":0.02384392322257879,"score_gpt":0.2933537200628461,"score_spread":0.2695097968402673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618376294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99890447,0.00004212386,0.000112862785,0.000031453506,0.0000048218867,0.0000016649714,0.0000130324615,0.000002271769,0.0008873663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963653,0.000016999611,0.00004255814,0.000018994862,0.0000060149905,9.280769e-7,0.000015467696,6.9839325e-7,0.00026186588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992762,0.00025350577,0.00005578637,0.00008546739,0.00024542236,0.000083635125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860318,0.0039520687,0.007056807,0.0008148504,0.0006809106,0.0014635687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007895119,0.00020452328,0.0001725829,0.0006494283,0.000342616,0.0010109345,0.00019662028,0.00026748332,0.0017161809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009784624,0.00013276997,0.00012540471,0.00028531658,0.00046819236,0.00036037783,0.000645937,0.00043235114,0.00028290285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016880994,0.00015475457,0.9684295,0.000031040006,0.0000557397,0.0005262066,0.0065993266,0.00010755723,0.0054992973,0.0002127086,0.00017467473,0.01804038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003175626,0.00008627888,0.99743587,0.000005542638,0.0000062619542,0.00040651154,0.0013244174,0.00011512978,0.0002345375,0.00011316243,0.00026238736,0.0000066791526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000719366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015686959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017161809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017515871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011699898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005741179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748361065","doi":"10.1177/0001839217727706","title":"The Structural Origins of Unearned Status: How Arbitrary Changes in Categories Affect Status Position and Market Impact","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Earnings; Equity (law); Quality (philosophy); Categorical variable; Social status; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Business; Demographic economics; Political science; Sociology; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.03272235785993313,"score_gpt":0.30017798753363995,"score_spread":0.26745562967370684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748361065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98427343,0.000052205953,0.0013904995,0.00035373567,0.0000074469035,0.000013090992,0.00003640738,0.0000079781685,0.013865356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992461,0.000014122427,0.0003531287,0.000020501035,0.0000040980603,0.000004173053,0.000019360923,0.0000040132854,0.00033464306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843985,0.0006385576,0.00007540292,0.00020491946,0.00042941063,0.00021177281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758184,0.0109034,0.0067006685,0.0022757137,0.0018700114,0.002431755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023678907,0.00014495813,0.00016419376,0.0009521736,0.00086851127,0.0037907122,0.00052511186,0.00063887227,0.0062278523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031230023,0.00018638493,0.00019812601,0.00067025056,0.0028508746,0.0027806368,0.0017656058,0.0010813031,0.00036794593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006943338,0.00055463857,0.88186514,0.00006653918,0.00010956726,0.00030083235,0.013469682,0.0018839629,0.014324452,0.035146922,0.0005469666,0.05103702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002969977,0.00023465534,0.96211493,0.000028470558,0.00003413269,0.00009797051,0.005774467,0.0029310791,0.0014161065,0.02553037,0.0017772333,0.000030863295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038998278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006379431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062278523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011637803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006051317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020834208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760371630","doi":"10.1177/0001839217733972","title":"From Synchronizing to Harmonizing: The Process of Authenticating Multiple Work Identities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Identity (music); Work (physics); Process (computing); Sociology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Feeling; Social psychology; Authentication (law); Cognitive reframing; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.21711267758357025,"score_gpt":0.39513714489664503,"score_spread":0.17802446731307478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760371630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93968624,0.0005999775,0.03495597,0.0033869823,0.000101907055,0.0001879373,0.0000309553,0.00007702155,0.020973077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584216,0.000102889964,0.003129685,0.00013255113,0.000011877314,0.000040814975,0.000015345428,0.000024585524,0.0007001136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96521294,0.026558507,0.0010761403,0.0019438672,0.0037201429,0.0014882472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601198,0.023013301,0.0051911473,0.0060210894,0.003226858,0.0024278404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029555425,0.0005094944,0.0007859677,0.0024938982,0.011719429,0.010987849,0.0020711913,0.0020085233,0.002177186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06284263,0.0007836083,0.000768096,0.0014716345,0.02614496,0.014697334,0.021125868,0.004339806,0.0004863036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055067536,0.000029376355,0.0077309045,0.00008289392,0.000011851283,0.00038442423,0.9487636,0.00012818845,0.001567221,0.020290961,0.0003895758,0.020566007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016888578,0.00015516089,0.006435121,0.0002932059,0.0000213444,0.0008010199,0.9313949,0.0006591728,0.0014238411,0.0288383,0.029883314,0.00007779578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019152081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015078692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029555425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025500536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049487324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15630591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768254789","doi":"10.1177/0001839217744555","title":"Field Expansion and Contraction: How Communities Shape Social and Symbolic Boundaries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Identity (music); The Symbolic; Symbolic capital; Symbolic power; Boundary-work; Sociology; Social identity theory; Politics; Social group; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04894194024033163,"score_gpt":0.3004390950046286,"score_spread":0.251497154764297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768254789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816222,0.00022683866,0.001600351,0.0017840891,0.000023518813,0.000048951966,0.000021969558,0.000011425592,0.014660507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986557,0.000044972767,0.0003912841,0.000108195636,0.000005510228,0.000025144953,0.00000982667,0.0000051835386,0.0007543299],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245375,0.0047814073,0.00014174814,0.0007622704,0.0006219753,0.0012388733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772932,0.012860874,0.0027822133,0.0013855748,0.0017374826,0.003940591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012837567,0.00024931523,0.00040357327,0.0028371802,0.013902294,0.0076912353,0.0017490144,0.0017650644,0.0053580385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025323689,0.00039998925,0.0002269702,0.0013904626,0.018013049,0.012570161,0.010985073,0.0025587524,0.00027663802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019745826,0.00029153397,0.048012204,0.00007782484,0.000014462502,0.00046616883,0.8694734,0.00018732306,0.0016219494,0.05254772,0.001005111,0.026104815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046133813,0.00017859162,0.057368565,0.00016075677,0.000014057034,0.00016835841,0.8832232,0.00087808847,0.00069250463,0.034986258,0.022216933,0.00006660968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01397261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017209688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01397261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049914923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048361868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06789237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778734562","doi":"10.1177/0001839217750856","title":"More and Less Effective Updating: The Role of Trajectory Management in Making Sense Again","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sensemaking; Process (computing); Computer science; Event (particle physics); Test (biology); Trajectory; Cognitive psychology; Work (physics); Psychology; Unexpected events; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.025572701147567527,"score_gpt":0.36975024442965954,"score_spread":0.344177543282092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778734562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964019,0.0005610021,0.015132959,0.0019299306,0.00007215438,0.00007264966,0.00003092741,0.00010232433,0.01807897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950852,0.00011825585,0.0041382196,0.0001031017,0.000016692635,0.000014632362,0.000019035484,0.000026443253,0.00047836718],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98461294,0.009316647,0.00080111646,0.0014517264,0.0026189631,0.0011985548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463926,0.0274943,0.010554609,0.008170217,0.0036400522,0.0037481324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010661816,0.0004841778,0.00041439195,0.0015417559,0.0024577184,0.0072199046,0.0013527303,0.0014985407,0.0019278718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08350644,0.00049460464,0.00041127173,0.00094335276,0.0075390623,0.006946943,0.005700034,0.002168087,0.00022254616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044950045,0.00059369183,0.15462284,0.0005009192,0.00013285491,0.0006696007,0.5408269,0.0022266617,0.01299142,0.022525294,0.0015332474,0.2629271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014345955,0.0012843582,0.42483643,0.0009014923,0.00021138694,0.0013914666,0.44378263,0.010466559,0.0066627245,0.06279651,0.047119103,0.00040391507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048048706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029194315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010661816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018451192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034139631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056385696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803163520","doi":"10.1177/0001839218779806","title":"Cutting the Cord: Mutual Respect, Organizational Autonomy, and Independence in Organizational Separation Processes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Service Delivery and Organisation Programme","keywords":"Autonomy; Interdependence; Competence (human resources); Business; Process (computing); Independence (probability theory); Knowledge management; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.022067858043423077,"score_gpt":0.2940744691840235,"score_spread":0.27200661114060043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803163520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375402,0.0008228888,0.016090091,0.007451067,0.000046904162,0.00007984855,0.000017896062,0.000014374475,0.037936673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862766,0.00005365748,0.00083283224,0.00008179332,0.0000040775153,0.000014683738,0.000004545527,0.0000022926818,0.00037858574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844083,0.01120254,0.00057632825,0.00057661114,0.0022234665,0.0010128018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714608,0.019393288,0.0046800007,0.0011215383,0.0015393214,0.0018050194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01361075,0.00021317374,0.00028420644,0.0019181892,0.0051253675,0.004703263,0.00079934555,0.0010755694,0.0019431185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02892784,0.00025747417,0.00032719228,0.0013071327,0.023795065,0.010222154,0.008328045,0.002475947,0.00008336341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011415449,0.00015473778,0.049375366,0.00020815432,0.0000187797,0.00046200285,0.6661794,0.00058570213,0.0006309515,0.24931556,0.000493492,0.032461725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005770383,0.00026801846,0.09207315,0.0008284661,0.000052436913,0.0006328766,0.66019124,0.0040634484,0.001212947,0.21083723,0.029665787,0.000116698306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008173533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087559605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01361075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005924898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007107043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07198137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912561681","doi":"10.1177/0001839219832310","title":"Explaining the Persistence of Gender Inequality: The Work–family Narrative as a Social Defense against the 24/7 Work Culture","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Harvard Business School","keywords":"Narrative; Status quo; Sociology; Inequality; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.17663563554639006,"score_gpt":0.3444932746809684,"score_spread":0.16785763913457835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912561681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.817866,0.0031285444,0.010712929,0.05528775,0.00037672685,0.000043707623,0.000087069835,0.000032439882,0.11246483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975126,0.0003165979,0.00039806712,0.00049683,0.000041851046,0.000011007574,0.000011416991,0.00001159728,0.0011999425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735427,0.0016286832,0.000045791712,0.00021440428,0.00022938258,0.0005275867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597037,0.0025152597,0.0005691183,0.00025647084,0.00022475979,0.00046411515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045806207,0.00054284633,0.0003371249,0.0016085323,0.012304228,0.008597536,0.0017189474,0.002360233,0.0042957272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005614704,0.00027736378,0.0003070573,0.0009945229,0.038473405,0.009334012,0.008297859,0.0038729932,0.00026097998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024942798,0.000037297985,0.009524788,0.000041284828,0.000006723494,0.0010003829,0.6646905,0.00016256992,0.00020326262,0.315181,0.0014885867,0.007638686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011417216,0.000037512375,0.008098046,0.0003237467,0.000012878189,0.0005297108,0.79959357,0.0009037349,0.000316599,0.13869125,0.051448368,0.000033183926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015065586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01706112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015065586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059340755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040310053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04305494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918609758","doi":"10.1177/0001839219835867","title":"Gender Gaps in Perceived Start-up Ease: Implications of Sex-based Labor Market Segregation for Entrepreneurship across 22 European Countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Seventh Framework Programme; University of Alberta","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Salary; Wage; Order (exchange); Labour economics; Differential (mechanical device); Economics; Perception; Demographic economics; Psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.03462204111786917,"score_gpt":0.3089187167376968,"score_spread":0.2742966756198276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918609758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970613,0.0006332289,0.00011317572,0.00011270256,0.000010434328,0.0000037301375,0.00011839716,0.0000011222089,0.0019458063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971896,0.00008810968,0.000023818613,0.000015884558,0.0000023565296,0.000001873002,0.00004180879,8.651588e-7,0.000106135914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985623,0.00066773157,0.000106547974,0.00025271368,0.00015297222,0.00025773537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643326,0.0016131229,0.0010653441,0.0002293601,0.0002514187,0.0004073727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029480248,0.00016152146,0.00034466403,0.001115824,0.0006133093,0.0011886508,0.00025768657,0.00021603159,0.002432634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046785926,0.00012300338,0.00027140524,0.0011846257,0.001045341,0.00069593947,0.001539954,0.00030691564,0.00012891206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000169341,0.000028067896,0.9779112,0.000047650938,0.00008626241,0.00017534156,0.007820252,0.00012450523,0.00021263001,0.0012072969,0.00024036622,0.011977047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000321652,0.000038487105,0.9905565,0.000042296917,0.00001487596,0.00007544398,0.007992614,0.000059066908,0.00008863147,0.00022965916,0.00089393475,0.000005355637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055413865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008692734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055413865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029144564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031116835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015590847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921205889","doi":"10.1177/0001839219836670","title":"Organizational Structure from Interaction: Evidence from Corporate Sustainability Efforts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational field; Situational ethics; Politics; Structuring; Organizational structure; Sustainability; Organizational studies; Organizational learning; Knowledge management; Public relations; Sociology; Organization development; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Institutional theory; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.02785815366708364,"score_gpt":0.27138659064899223,"score_spread":0.2435284369819086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921205889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980913,0.000670762,0.00079830934,0.0014819438,0.00001445765,0.000023998307,0.00003397556,0.0000059249483,0.016057586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918646,0.00018018883,0.00017734585,0.00012375896,0.000011723427,0.000019393583,0.000035412086,0.000004672552,0.0002611075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98861617,0.007281135,0.0004547902,0.0009709832,0.0016847576,0.0009921124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9071679,0.057569463,0.02160736,0.005267883,0.0041862647,0.0042010504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009184255,0.00021452192,0.00031114634,0.0031374071,0.0035446838,0.0046343305,0.0010127274,0.0016048524,0.0042838817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045908026,0.00041444172,0.00031573206,0.0024373077,0.005593083,0.004425331,0.0059377644,0.0016589976,0.0004626684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034569387,0.0007280984,0.6230822,0.0003739056,0.00016559017,0.00070014026,0.28450882,0.00032373815,0.000896356,0.016184,0.0012658277,0.07142562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040478244,0.00029722543,0.7873157,0.00034584448,0.00006533546,0.00036857952,0.18731739,0.0006637735,0.00049559644,0.010402299,0.01264633,0.00004141801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030926426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004860449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009184255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014596538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013812752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048571587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922276896","doi":"10.1177/0001839218817520","title":"What Is Dead May Never Die: Institutional Regeneration through Logic Reemergence in Dutch Beer Brewing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Craft; Brewing; Context (archaeology); German; Industrial Revolution; Sociology; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06934967247341396,"score_gpt":0.3289185787111033,"score_spread":0.25956890623768936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922276896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552568,0.00066417,0.0044858693,0.0017850475,0.000018166204,0.000036881036,0.00004353044,0.00001648812,0.03769287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739754,0.000119523764,0.00046250154,0.000059886574,0.0000023810046,0.00001066306,0.00001696215,0.000025070321,0.0019055279],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941346,0.0034346473,0.00017997157,0.00051774917,0.0009071647,0.0008257718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953218,0.002829446,0.00073558965,0.0003983685,0.00045166555,0.00026300474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005207251,0.00025657407,0.0004706023,0.0014669675,0.0063585853,0.009144184,0.0015767682,0.0014666867,0.0037040766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009247025,0.00050783885,0.00032056772,0.0020297717,0.024499036,0.011097303,0.0049065812,0.0022204162,0.0002658848],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042396397,0.00003399876,0.0033711153,0.00008225186,0.000008613515,0.0011260003,0.9235744,0.0002894752,0.0014493008,0.061549306,0.00040630714,0.008066912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018618293,0.000032606204,0.005915141,0.00015136645,0.000017043963,0.0003927416,0.90725917,0.0009642991,0.0013174628,0.019453293,0.06443689,0.0000414041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056889005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08261847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056889005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013158006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041093538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11311573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938815745","doi":"10.1177/0001839219844175","title":"Duality in Diversity: How Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Cultural Heterogeneity Relate to Firm Performance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":200,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intrapersonal communication; Interpersonal communication; Creativity; Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Profitability index; Social psychology; Psychology; Interpersonal relationship; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03827997114467472,"score_gpt":0.2824178614854093,"score_spread":0.2441378903407346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938815745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925769,0.00019188074,0.0018310036,0.00037666134,0.0000104680485,0.0000118508515,0.000038641592,0.000007130159,0.0049555814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975353,0.00001768912,0.0001347227,0.000014803653,0.000006482063,0.0000029715252,0.000011644793,0.0000017552342,0.000056497483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953181,0.0025329294,0.00025361878,0.00064386224,0.00080064876,0.00045067922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479063,0.029764116,0.012332904,0.0034511944,0.0030457857,0.0034997487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00566851,0.00023249921,0.00039042666,0.0024410528,0.00100756,0.0048337663,0.00045204948,0.00067803083,0.0014853842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038135834,0.00018444324,0.00035966514,0.0020563398,0.0026671574,0.0037516265,0.003916473,0.0009876973,0.00020023594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024623613,0.00016083791,0.9439571,0.000059563976,0.00024655665,0.00017688241,0.012903402,0.0019370088,0.0016333017,0.00441821,0.0004044805,0.033856403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013520406,0.00015460144,0.9757867,0.00004228794,0.00005617414,0.0001281818,0.009826124,0.0040039653,0.00047580487,0.008522841,0.00093688763,0.000052853116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002379287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021195153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00566851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011410622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006685491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029978275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970320707","doi":"10.1177/0001839219869913","title":"Election Cycles and Organizations: How Politics Shapes the Performance of State-owned Enterprises over Time","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Incentive; Disadvantaged; State (computer science); State owned; Business; Market economy; State capitalism; Political economy; Economic system; Capitalism; Economics; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.011763968041813703,"score_gpt":0.24900357883635643,"score_spread":0.23723961079454273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970320707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98993605,0.00015966754,0.00043940268,0.0006519883,0.000011129674,0.000008762365,0.00006932696,0.000006224734,0.008717507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940634,0.000031193817,0.000032128475,0.000024988394,0.0000061101878,0.0000020514558,0.000025345596,0.0000018508985,0.0004700884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986897,0.0005411498,0.000049796967,0.00018938155,0.00016220058,0.0003678603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928687,0.0021308889,0.0028795216,0.00045721588,0.00060337596,0.0010602062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001959963,0.00008664395,0.00021776753,0.0009223932,0.00088615523,0.0026319681,0.00025772932,0.00047754083,0.003895344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008902591,0.00011490193,0.00014184066,0.0010542892,0.0011351202,0.001320369,0.0009644533,0.00045853315,0.0004691822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021063224,0.00029633142,0.9441473,0.00003174284,0.00008428412,0.00013590752,0.004646021,0.0020339338,0.0015377469,0.011847133,0.0013415363,0.033687454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009966701,0.00012598411,0.98312783,0.000018282997,0.000019154753,0.00003330879,0.0045050723,0.0022364287,0.00035428914,0.00430091,0.0052495617,0.000019294144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007065585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013073165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007065585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001068551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006989827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014048934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981995135","doi":"10.1177/0001839219879646","title":"Examining Anger’s Immobilizing Effect on Institutional Insiders’ Action Intentions in Social Movements","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anger; Collective action; Social movement; Action (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11111978879046576,"score_gpt":0.39935581769223966,"score_spread":0.2882360289017739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981995135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521184,0.000023758063,0.00035926382,0.00013065826,0.000009414546,0.000023365115,0.000011218362,0.0000037925595,0.0042266957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909234,0.000019629906,0.00021680954,0.000059563863,0.0000061438354,0.000056592464,0.000018551804,0.0000037685534,0.00052653835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653363,0.0018928988,0.00014011461,0.0004321703,0.00046096975,0.0005403092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804658,0.00943596,0.006387622,0.0014149351,0.000854097,0.0014415968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042038644,0.00041826267,0.0003572631,0.000591866,0.0017055877,0.0024503318,0.0004514584,0.0008520928,0.004378015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016956575,0.00034599737,0.00053910905,0.0002921375,0.0029964251,0.0011696167,0.0024304378,0.0017961389,0.0003256239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002107749,0.0046938183,0.74567455,0.0003347091,0.00033467062,0.00043051518,0.18052617,0.00066090596,0.020545766,0.006095003,0.0007354666,0.037860673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004852818,0.0007859703,0.9573541,0.00007875444,0.00008875076,0.00006905881,0.037170682,0.0007348156,0.0013546123,0.001189865,0.0010863186,0.00003846298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003514525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004509632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004378015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013035442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006842288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022232473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984711778","doi":"10.1177/0001839219887663","title":"Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":427,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Conflation; Tying; Replication (statistics); Trustworthiness; Qualitative research; Computer science; Internet privacy; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer security; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06495649930329646,"score_gpt":0.40418424089879795,"score_spread":0.3392277415955015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984711778","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000096332355,0.0014433808,0.00027171182,0.15028524,0.8461168,0.000034782093,0.00004504951,0.00007880358,0.0016279279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001880963,0.0018866562,0.0005728243,0.07701307,0.9053542,0.000083494095,0.00004213959,0.00012226669,0.013044449],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872794,0.003624679,0.0013576611,0.001321488,0.005784371,0.00063231535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9264821,0.04408635,0.0029319027,0.0016863802,0.021256374,0.0035568662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015734406,0.0026838125,0.0020568038,0.0031972239,0.006473121,0.00945255,0.0033322668,0.017570445,0.009615817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082539916,0.000882844,0.002031138,0.0016616675,0.0055331546,0.005044019,0.002495652,0.019857958,0.0065702563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590942,0.000008929544,0.000032183885,0.000070106405,0.0000058086034,0.00010031042,0.000056118508,0.000024034287,0.000034809866,0.00035059554,0.9966479,0.0026532612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004969188,0.000022805536,0.00026231207,0.0006638053,0.000028461367,0.0003764479,0.0002851738,0.00030296633,0.00017332776,0.0035699576,0.9942298,0.000035229965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026646103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005306738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98426557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047914637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057038055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083212495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987661574","doi":"10.1177/0001839219893691","title":"Dual Networking: How Collaborators Network in Their Quest for Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Multinational corporation; Argument (complex analysis); Dual role; Division of labour; Knowledge management; Business; Marketing; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.07190900891533321,"score_gpt":0.29158988314828294,"score_spread":0.21968087423294974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987661574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7893583,0.0015022598,0.024810666,0.010587028,0.00021494336,0.00011619489,0.000079454076,0.00014061622,0.17319053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904574,0.00039674246,0.00322369,0.0003414512,0.00003877621,0.00007249955,0.00003620408,0.00003968168,0.005393585],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848337,0.008067361,0.00023664584,0.0011030897,0.0010014918,0.0011080136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97941077,0.010062614,0.0034470668,0.0015830027,0.0013876882,0.0041088834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008660632,0.00049557537,0.0004112925,0.0028729774,0.008241163,0.013940569,0.0016111978,0.002853112,0.0095189335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03634966,0.0005649802,0.0005611053,0.0018331165,0.008426605,0.013450548,0.014065803,0.0018296263,0.0016022307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000574995,0.0003726385,0.12835869,0.00037893435,0.00012341274,0.0024300807,0.4035117,0.0034225166,0.0054757367,0.29956365,0.009577467,0.14621013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023759752,0.0007238047,0.04516723,0.0007963379,0.00020689788,0.002286274,0.41635612,0.009190232,0.0020890285,0.33258632,0.19012266,0.00023753714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002770519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037523448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013940569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024029638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032884453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045802355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006030902","doi":"10.1177/0001839219899606","title":"Tie Dissolution in Market Networks: A Theory of Vicarious Performance Feedback","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Ambiguity; Dyad; Context (archaeology); Social exchange theory; Information exchange; Business; Marketing; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Microeconomics; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03160776568000515,"score_gpt":0.2543981134589837,"score_spread":0.22279034777897858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006030902","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39673728,0.0012033711,0.4466281,0.008521972,0.00017490196,0.00040129723,0.00020709282,0.00027563793,0.14585048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98311794,0.00023907096,0.013393806,0.00023199698,0.00005936492,0.00013710019,0.000039179595,0.000026604203,0.002754993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957841,0.0021246823,0.00012312013,0.0007869741,0.00075070397,0.00043044068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744518,0.01556712,0.0051709865,0.0015984601,0.0015164545,0.0016952028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005433668,0.00067872,0.0006721548,0.0025374347,0.0020386067,0.0045920806,0.0019381016,0.0023363938,0.008244753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033135574,0.00048346043,0.0009097609,0.0014874869,0.0065339915,0.009585683,0.0032815214,0.0019694977,0.0006270198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017474436,0.00022004353,0.02521117,0.00021231339,0.00011327841,0.0005874215,0.018220263,0.030422257,0.0017218711,0.8667387,0.0017787687,0.054599177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078158155,0.00021780151,0.009600745,0.000108014705,0.00006885169,0.0004439775,0.0041231117,0.12888496,0.0004420885,0.8479993,0.0079422705,0.0000906998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032150385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020339903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008244753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036911971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014784188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028736293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012321052","doi":"10.1177/0001839220916401","title":"Maintaining Places of Social Inclusion: Ebola and the Emergency Department","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Custodians; Inclusion (mineral); Meaning (existential); Public relations; Democracy; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.03071063750607413,"score_gpt":0.34410008441657847,"score_spread":0.31338944691050435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012321052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85818017,0.0024206876,0.008613319,0.051914994,0.0005098039,0.000071205824,0.00004378191,0.000032628865,0.078213446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736553,0.0003130755,0.0006065062,0.00068256876,0.000045235432,0.000021724141,0.0000060372663,0.0000084458825,0.0009509651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923895,0.0058082114,0.00012281539,0.00029966218,0.00041370283,0.0009661173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951846,0.0022789114,0.0007857229,0.00031015443,0.00027070032,0.0011698845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051575797,0.00035645594,0.0003942675,0.0012408616,0.020678815,0.012590241,0.0018808077,0.0032155947,0.0037123887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076968926,0.00033593105,0.0004430894,0.0012351673,0.039934408,0.012727429,0.024261955,0.0040402412,0.00030020048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006267475,0.00010925678,0.0057040355,0.00008941497,0.000010501707,0.0011802006,0.78556156,0.0002183106,0.00023079092,0.19457236,0.0019567714,0.010304167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013480153,0.00004978687,0.0030944622,0.00021075387,0.000010738626,0.00039848738,0.91696614,0.000294381,0.00018171118,0.043797377,0.034952473,0.000030200974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006167425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011137915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020678815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056482335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005418395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040981054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109398233","doi":"10.1177/0001839220970936","title":"An Interaction Ritual Theory of Social Resource Exchange: Evidence from a Silicon Valley Accelerator","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social exchange theory; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Context (archaeology); Dilemma; Thriving; Social dilemma; Sociology; Economic system; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.09124992139630951,"score_gpt":0.3332457267199766,"score_spread":0.2419958053236671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109398233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830252,0.00015299958,0.0017125158,0.0005167337,0.0000045344423,0.000026586706,0.000028118191,0.0000069931134,0.01452618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776435,0.00011348895,0.0008258525,0.00006540066,0.0000027567626,0.000022200242,0.000026703627,0.0000072233556,0.0011720577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962632,0.0027173893,0.0000884585,0.00027044406,0.00042023917,0.00024031804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689266,0.02480079,0.0029159836,0.0011637883,0.0011676193,0.0010250952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006564159,0.00021494244,0.00034749287,0.0011925299,0.0041870545,0.0033832898,0.0014923249,0.00095238636,0.0068379757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016430335,0.00040206703,0.00022279819,0.0017134864,0.006773657,0.003655594,0.0032280167,0.0014759942,0.0005621714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005501422,0.0008321203,0.1878317,0.0004939199,0.00010683143,0.0022426683,0.6864863,0.0016876241,0.001252669,0.056306306,0.0022174749,0.05999231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015388743,0.0008503567,0.26773816,0.00038802213,0.000077593024,0.001367115,0.6402675,0.0094330665,0.0011769554,0.03299453,0.045437895,0.00011494616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009927107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01950059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009927107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020616336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021687772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034714997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111505809","doi":"10.1177/0001839220980015","title":"The Unfolding of Control Mechanisms inside Organizations: Pathways of Customization and Transmutation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Context (archaeology); Mechanism (biology); Personalization; Knowledge management; Process management; Process (computing); Function (biology); Management control system; Organizational unit; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","score_opus":0.019659432372523024,"score_gpt":0.23046676625425147,"score_spread":0.21080733388172845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111505809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90870404,0.0004646828,0.05791512,0.0021206029,0.00002485718,0.00028077688,0.000038956012,0.00024943321,0.030201603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454296,0.000057779434,0.0047947387,0.00004137154,0.0000025220465,0.00004236015,0.000012081522,0.000028810216,0.0004773334],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834114,0.009974451,0.00055221136,0.0018876778,0.0022203359,0.0019539588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95359117,0.025580568,0.006649229,0.009324441,0.002974509,0.0018801888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013258109,0.0005523718,0.0005000167,0.002689053,0.0048853103,0.009301066,0.0019995824,0.0021567477,0.0033805624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046022173,0.0009978965,0.00082641945,0.0015720311,0.019868031,0.01494248,0.010075143,0.003928462,0.00030040377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002880486,0.00047503237,0.09315613,0.0003045898,0.00010019241,0.0023950762,0.57751715,0.0046058963,0.010866536,0.17379266,0.00069544796,0.13580318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009958438,0.001078488,0.13172042,0.0007778176,0.00011918553,0.003065399,0.52799475,0.018161163,0.016217856,0.26654086,0.033808596,0.0004158643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043212115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035863859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013258109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046523334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004408384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07011646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121500353","doi":"10.2307/2667075","title":"How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":780,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Interpersonal ties; Perception; Business; Social network (sociolinguistics); Public relations; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.08636161780670826,"score_gpt":0.3156493175787229,"score_spread":0.22928769977201463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121500353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974673,0.00006074236,0.000050471906,0.00011357132,0.000004032659,0.0000018826862,0.000009916514,6.325459e-7,0.0022914847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995283,0.000042863492,0.000017310522,0.000021666297,0.000009146246,0.0000012833007,0.000009553253,5.613195e-7,0.00036938957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991518,0.00040048594,0.00003109316,0.00008735766,0.00013164649,0.00019762629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496317,0.0014371634,0.0017771513,0.0001601011,0.00026507862,0.0013973678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008641021,0.00012902853,0.00015393125,0.00046396727,0.0009986431,0.0012266975,0.00022034043,0.00028084512,0.0043079904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062402715,0.00007750506,0.00011490225,0.00020034959,0.00057129964,0.000697936,0.0011072182,0.0004035256,0.00034991882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012773229,0.00013453202,0.97493035,0.000014827474,0.00003979126,0.00014608467,0.009233632,0.00011572405,0.0013100766,0.0005076793,0.00021500615,0.013224575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053858525,0.000096521035,0.98383474,0.000018585064,0.00002071596,0.00012319579,0.013671896,0.00022964149,0.00029253293,0.00027233802,0.0014266995,0.000007669827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058646435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015157192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058646435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003481899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002762053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014411628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123354546","doi":"10.1177/0001839213500032","title":"Keeping up Appearances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":601,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Prosocial behavior; Reputation; Impression management; Repertoire; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06331496867873718,"score_gpt":0.3928850514864522,"score_spread":0.32957008280771505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123354546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3019177,0.00096272083,0.010552402,0.0041101263,0.001022371,0.00011104593,0.0003135597,0.00067152746,0.6803385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7803495,0.00042144835,0.004291537,0.0016733174,0.00026934672,0.000041794072,0.00027069042,0.00033522694,0.2123472],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847096,0.0003071353,0.0000454626,0.00027405823,0.00062718365,0.0002752453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701774,0.00041531742,0.0006298713,0.0006515547,0.0006190608,0.00066635484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010460558,0.00045561005,0.00032229666,0.00088104303,0.0026364315,0.0034541488,0.00068445865,0.0011339011,0.051502366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00505979,0.00025555235,0.0004738121,0.00049612176,0.0014965265,0.0030502786,0.0028217528,0.0019426655,0.012534452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058903405,0.00057900837,0.08887443,0.00047443737,0.00015786997,0.0024965869,0.05862853,0.0005527192,0.020156179,0.11849712,0.11117587,0.5978182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034969995,0.0004252608,0.09405055,0.00020354104,0.00012306785,0.002493422,0.027573757,0.0010753196,0.0028242252,0.0123242615,0.8587672,0.000104533625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002249818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033943532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051502366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008864627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041689907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17229259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124152171","doi":"10.2189/asqu.53.1.73","title":"Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes' Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative Networks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cooperativeness; Business; Industrial organization; Investment (military); Structural equation modeling; Information sharing; Stylized fact; Structural holes; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Social capital; Personality","score_opus":0.03722793309597468,"score_gpt":0.29329934008034936,"score_spread":0.2560714069843747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124152171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978528,0.0000295693,0.00008139841,0.00020288436,0.0000011090565,0.000003082964,0.000012889394,0.0000010731471,0.0018152432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99983525,0.000013633613,0.000018125671,0.0000064921637,0.0000019076426,8.407523e-7,0.000007753373,6.567548e-7,0.000115423565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991259,0.00036673376,0.00004131019,0.00011538921,0.00012862975,0.0002220527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784564,0.010433821,0.0075229825,0.000518797,0.0008704765,0.0021974791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016732925,0.000081819475,0.0001898736,0.001096093,0.0010226395,0.002513464,0.0003473468,0.0006261679,0.0042080763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017091693,0.00014833693,0.00013361685,0.0009762024,0.0021618025,0.002640113,0.0012957496,0.00047495362,0.00033406005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047669548,0.00026495385,0.95719564,0.000020916592,0.000059091464,0.00025410234,0.011054699,0.00084654905,0.0008246616,0.005584462,0.00067983544,0.022738412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019322653,0.000116243486,0.9817779,0.000019192259,0.000028892522,0.00009394313,0.011162994,0.0019526733,0.00020542364,0.0034691186,0.0011400986,0.0000142331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014632291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022916695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014632291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011408889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050317845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02909422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126038992","doi":"10.1177/0001839214554990","title":"The Contaminating Effects of Building Instrumental Ties","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Friendship; Social psychology; Morality; Power (physics); Interpersonal ties; Political science","score_opus":0.01450725039644686,"score_gpt":0.36567176415099284,"score_spread":0.351164513754546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126038992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9364964,0.0007616714,0.020412039,0.0015133357,0.00024260813,0.00023813537,0.00017194371,0.00012815848,0.040035766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915916,0.00021816228,0.0050992416,0.0004433117,0.00008387723,0.00014298032,0.00009244552,0.000045201625,0.002283167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857078,0.008508071,0.0006564823,0.0016429542,0.0028561128,0.0006285939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89027864,0.06482069,0.01700899,0.020671662,0.0035151958,0.0037047684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009861708,0.00074917113,0.0005993279,0.0009138824,0.0031733147,0.002733048,0.0012809072,0.0010886809,0.0075390167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077462606,0.0004978727,0.00061371544,0.0006510867,0.0035103308,0.0024655226,0.005191722,0.0023991445,0.00050405745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004091472,0.0035648288,0.5342468,0.0017980189,0.0010924955,0.0022627471,0.046120327,0.0048870216,0.048858583,0.06667138,0.004200467,0.28220594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030595213,0.004753115,0.8122706,0.001087904,0.0009803857,0.0033361132,0.023929683,0.0077528977,0.028876051,0.06010812,0.0562326,0.00036665375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017858342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018189204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009861708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011513879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008019911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052154303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154698993","doi":"10.1177/00018392211010118","title":"The Invisible Cage: Workers’ Reactivity to Opaque Algorithmic Evaluations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Third party; Work (physics); Computer science; Psychology; Business; Internet privacy; Public relations; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04394486010557001,"score_gpt":0.3843965281236131,"score_spread":0.34045166801804305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154698993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96642685,0.00031790097,0.009761993,0.0022199713,0.00011770674,0.00008558351,0.000037573216,0.00024412651,0.020788267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624455,0.000058269517,0.0011820014,0.0005762901,0.000024325238,0.000049379418,0.000023088201,0.00007456915,0.0017675458],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96307546,0.022612602,0.0011601001,0.0029126098,0.0076559605,0.0025831982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92812496,0.034678183,0.013982147,0.011565095,0.007215963,0.00443361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02200858,0.00071809517,0.0006297439,0.0014217407,0.0055411863,0.007696882,0.0018291702,0.0022422397,0.0033569643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08044069,0.0007963322,0.00078419276,0.00067581807,0.010618612,0.003364631,0.0089236,0.004169112,0.00073128066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005843113,0.00025002903,0.14174964,0.00028849317,0.0001285442,0.0016031986,0.76100254,0.0008754374,0.008425751,0.008582806,0.009183062,0.06732618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108904256,0.0011108748,0.12884565,0.0005384388,0.000083348306,0.0010075942,0.77246356,0.0056215655,0.0034590794,0.015242949,0.07096078,0.00055731623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006513187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005748328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02200858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032094195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024438784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116393924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158224042","doi":"10.1177/00018392211008880","title":"Order from Chaos: How Networked Activists Self-Organize by Creating a Participation Architecture","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sociotechnical system; Interdependence; Collective action; Normative; Sociology; Leverage (statistics); Knowledge management; Architecture; Computer science; Control (management); Public relations; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.016610951292116094,"score_gpt":0.2906107855240741,"score_spread":0.273999834231958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158224042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61019164,0.00055021455,0.113806106,0.011667601,0.00020435551,0.0003859053,0.00007650685,0.00031225555,0.2628054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985201,0.00008627315,0.008779086,0.000210345,0.00001629565,0.00012252606,0.000033680113,0.00006133256,0.005489462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923728,0.0052925074,0.00012771467,0.0007526346,0.00067692227,0.0007773145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261594,0.0039639426,0.0006836167,0.0013350145,0.0005068673,0.0008946066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009022752,0.0004725219,0.00027543033,0.0022814602,0.008925984,0.01091899,0.0018337187,0.002022803,0.0038977617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013335973,0.0004490872,0.0006043334,0.0010434575,0.029804474,0.014029393,0.011238084,0.0022317583,0.00057644554],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068302936,0.00009267554,0.0096752085,0.000105417515,0.000019684923,0.00048851647,0.46281868,0.002523198,0.0016927812,0.49509335,0.0019049031,0.025517223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000628742,0.00017376571,0.0067076306,0.00029021833,0.00003502007,0.00042911846,0.32832253,0.011509659,0.0016094391,0.4877363,0.16303182,0.00009164077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004007778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059633274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01091899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042340113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043933815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047717452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162870227","doi":"10.1177/00018392211012376","title":"Under the Umbrella: Goal-Derived Category Construction and Product Category Nesting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University; Waseda University; University of Glasgow","keywords":"Nesting (process); Product category; Product (mathematics); Process management; Business; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09863961685907825,"score_gpt":0.4026580819467984,"score_spread":0.3040184650877202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162870227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3490815,0.00040664567,0.31360963,0.0018640807,0.00007435261,0.0002238683,0.00024073942,0.00024620068,0.3342531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936424,0.00009292375,0.049984604,0.00012150697,0.000012677011,0.00012267352,0.00020500303,0.00011678125,0.012919826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553007,0.0022815869,0.000121403194,0.00072007434,0.0007228574,0.0006240026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955035,0.001239195,0.00041722067,0.0013422188,0.0010865717,0.0004113481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003846351,0.00042585938,0.00027879383,0.0020344781,0.006288963,0.007420041,0.0012487437,0.0012006195,0.0089525385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006873914,0.00049977365,0.0009473676,0.002308838,0.019371178,0.009759639,0.0050497726,0.002506957,0.0009939034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025101494,0.00002125478,0.009353308,0.000036971025,0.0000095518535,0.0002855879,0.048239984,0.00065055327,0.0013662104,0.9173258,0.00073009613,0.02195564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002053235,0.00008186829,0.04866403,0.00026748131,0.00004133721,0.00084064656,0.05897635,0.012664553,0.0032045993,0.744493,0.13064054,0.00010508288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09627898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13406663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09627898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008387105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005996926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19143713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185378072","doi":"10.2307/3094844","title":"ASQ Forum","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.058011091200795006,"score_gpt":0.3712576098599271,"score_spread":0.3132465186591321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185378072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009071475,0.00073709886,0.0014563303,0.012208721,0.008537716,0.0003432264,0.011306877,0.002631342,0.96187145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016287147,0.00013892977,0.00034176296,0.0011463664,0.0006437816,0.0000988477,0.0019266391,0.00045823638,0.9936168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978721,0.00040966235,0.00007105793,0.00024096384,0.0010772063,0.00032901755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952527,0.00052168645,0.00015720376,0.0006064656,0.0023124365,0.0011494152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004235115,0.0007835067,0.0009138951,0.0032919936,0.0028841756,0.008609424,0.0021035392,0.0036288833,0.7679147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076096426,0.00045211284,0.00069083145,0.0022201722,0.0007163382,0.0030720339,0.0035571132,0.002550124,0.5992111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003197782,0.000026501999,0.000061602484,0.000039469225,0.0000010358144,0.000012481738,0.000036981284,0.000015009201,0.00010068732,0.00404019,0.97953165,0.016102377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008500424,0.000005911765,0.00017569007,0.000018262039,7.054855e-7,0.0000056472786,0.000036613375,0.000033520704,0.000043439708,0.00080830994,0.9988606,0.0000029984462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077691404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012125133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7679147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002302772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036706233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213288561","doi":"10.1177/00018392211059505","title":"Status–Authority Asymmetry between Professions: The Case of 911 Dispatchers and Police Officers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy","keywords":"Officer; Compliance (psychology); Psychology; Trustworthiness; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10410682436602589,"score_gpt":0.46051432629535166,"score_spread":0.3564075019293258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213288561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99385923,0.000121590754,0.00050910655,0.0026879543,0.00003931379,0.000030845156,0.000019533549,0.000005609215,0.002726924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682766,0.0001615291,0.00042423082,0.00073802774,0.00003328824,0.00003162784,0.00002213714,0.000013237586,0.001748235],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888287,0.006759821,0.00036114763,0.0010260717,0.00093712634,0.00208702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98308045,0.009035419,0.002613264,0.000880812,0.0010367832,0.003353226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007840277,0.0005732851,0.0006119451,0.0017206863,0.02536165,0.006212269,0.0019452244,0.0029901864,0.0040401206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021134906,0.001241348,0.00043796565,0.0012096391,0.011316672,0.0055245105,0.007474993,0.006058452,0.0005502499],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028452923,0.000060350587,0.009760632,0.000022646864,0.0000045847046,0.0026470495,0.9832306,0.000025598512,0.0003596322,0.0009993762,0.0004988933,0.0023621283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005132886,0.00003953428,0.005263414,0.000041955627,0.000003253659,0.0005870211,0.9895281,0.000084525476,0.000096930744,0.00031488758,0.0040165815,0.000018572724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044280265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07910967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044280265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007184476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005530164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08804506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210360055","doi":"10.1177/00018392221075344","title":"Stigma Hierarchies: The Internal Dynamics of Stigmatization in the Sex Work Occupation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Alberta; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Science Research Council","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Social psychology; Hierarchy; Sociology; Sex work; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Criminology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.023601306070417168,"score_gpt":0.3424481600054207,"score_spread":0.31884685393500356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210360055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95856833,0.00025930948,0.0017522975,0.002679585,0.00002600156,0.000035758017,0.000018747307,0.000013344397,0.036646497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992575,0.000051630308,0.00014961325,0.00005660414,0.000004301022,0.0000069041,0.000005580425,0.0000034047966,0.00046443928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562305,0.0023826887,0.00011962615,0.00025312998,0.0008200896,0.0008013482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375594,0.0029889934,0.0011530826,0.0004132739,0.0006426715,0.0010459136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038378467,0.00021199873,0.00023678578,0.0018607413,0.011429292,0.006311992,0.00087404996,0.00096814195,0.0028549589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009180968,0.0003830655,0.00033729622,0.0010678398,0.023861108,0.004645683,0.008116214,0.002209011,0.00018260343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028174565,0.000047149424,0.035839476,0.000038222548,0.000008579467,0.00038275955,0.9282136,0.000108036285,0.0009056467,0.026464649,0.00050517946,0.0074585183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014091867,0.000039662642,0.07198117,0.00021095862,0.000015178276,0.00036102455,0.8913244,0.00088654034,0.00035101845,0.0191696,0.015598075,0.000048310903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05269792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040778413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05269792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008518959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007016219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1047824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244646703","doi":"10.2307/2666989","title":"Book Review","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02778264391512258,"score_gpt":0.35362173947700887,"score_spread":0.3258390955618863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244646703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038447836,0.08485799,0.0011964312,0.03269068,0.035743173,0.00014595895,0.0009583187,0.0005973389,0.8434256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00078440615,0.016193952,0.00025047894,0.0041098767,0.00418914,0.000032219592,0.00032703843,0.00010038253,0.97401243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993463,0.000058897578,0.000016827595,0.000072081595,0.0004489989,0.000056897818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784315,0.00038502354,0.0000940938,0.00016936463,0.0011194943,0.00038888815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007476136,0.0007667073,0.0008970739,0.0039395457,0.0014632711,0.0043688775,0.0011330006,0.0019878536,0.3659656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003978079,0.00038074254,0.00045437115,0.00473489,0.0007221293,0.0026027742,0.0014112728,0.002307032,0.33932567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036342224,0.0000071476857,0.000022237973,0.000053724692,9.2556377e-7,0.000007698258,0.0000067810856,0.00001952354,0.0000245707,0.0012030519,0.9565744,0.042076442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019085903,0.0000026263174,0.00007740626,0.00006164165,0.0000013214458,0.000013499754,0.000010683341,0.000011847019,0.00001314344,0.0005041349,0.99930036,0.0000014453062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066595217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018975148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6340344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021707232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003579692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9043731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362721051","doi":"10.1177/00018392231166635","title":"The Dynamics of Team Learning: Harmony and Rhythm in Teamwork Arrangements for Innovation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Yale School of Management; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Harvard Business School; Yale University","keywords":"Teamwork; Harmony (color); Rhythm; Group dynamic; Knowledge management; Psychology; Dynamics (music); Management; Business; Computer science; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.042646976352564155,"score_gpt":0.37914064441863243,"score_spread":0.3364936680660683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362721051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8826636,0.0010524875,0.04609808,0.0035922865,0.000097537704,0.000077744415,0.00004497365,0.000053147185,0.06632011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966139,0.00013359931,0.002761026,0.00005777063,0.000024382414,0.000024171564,0.000011060577,0.0000092677155,0.00036480106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977416,0.0012082917,0.00009506996,0.00029492294,0.00046363188,0.00019651162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945762,0.0028620334,0.0011707135,0.000510702,0.0002738852,0.00060644484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023305048,0.00021126644,0.00020015654,0.0010128022,0.0022598042,0.004680396,0.00055010064,0.00070527144,0.0021062975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012181365,0.0002128577,0.00027773343,0.0008610754,0.006183128,0.0037430834,0.00331375,0.0011190312,0.00021481358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034404357,0.000419386,0.20549934,0.00048626226,0.000098021286,0.00048150457,0.14070332,0.008067123,0.010770143,0.3254311,0.0025559824,0.30514368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009005183,0.00059277465,0.45492226,0.00048515547,0.00007896406,0.00088366476,0.079919346,0.014767358,0.003991669,0.40189824,0.042218756,0.00015181176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013799565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004680396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014585374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013834791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012325048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391052391","doi":"10.1177/00018392231221070","title":"License to Broker: How Mobility Eliminates Gender Gaps in Network Advantage","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Tsinghua University; McGill University; Universiteit van Tilburg; Emory University; George Mason University","keywords":"License; Business; Institution; Gender gap; Interpersonal ties; Strong ties; Affect (linguistics); Social mobility; Demographic economics; Public relations; Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09311765695543603,"score_gpt":0.3742105843328785,"score_spread":0.2810929273774425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391052391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97539425,0.0003839385,0.0030160951,0.0040995562,0.00006872992,0.000027880447,0.00066046475,0.00005232961,0.016296756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987184,0.000038469916,0.00030888448,0.00015045288,0.00001691262,0.000012830076,0.00010547751,0.000008289362,0.00064036844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978829,0.0009208751,0.00006838558,0.00047341464,0.0001770027,0.0004773657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922072,0.0037707405,0.0018096974,0.0008824018,0.0002993858,0.0010306208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026222153,0.00028008918,0.0004490418,0.0006426892,0.0015352191,0.0025287974,0.0009816978,0.00077168655,0.011107232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024085961,0.00015995142,0.0004533186,0.00078129466,0.0020984085,0.0029202157,0.0025720776,0.00061860756,0.00087865384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014882503,0.0005302807,0.7633047,0.00027597658,0.00041646787,0.0012049254,0.009406391,0.0059386212,0.0033969323,0.096816495,0.010698626,0.1065224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034687066,0.001070523,0.7454789,0.00042133775,0.0006021457,0.0008647412,0.027927093,0.020374795,0.0041739023,0.15514863,0.04347626,0.00011479424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00923666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008527938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011107232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009190833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018087047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037157416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401150680","doi":"10.1177/00018392241265699","title":"From Foe to Friend: Exploring State-Led Destigmatization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; State (computer science); Ideology; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Authoritarianism; Legislature; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Democracy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05561433682501711,"score_gpt":0.36844775608970487,"score_spread":0.3128334192646878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401150680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84082574,0.0006074967,0.03630674,0.010327345,0.00013522134,0.00016515276,0.00011811549,0.00012334666,0.111390926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953099,0.00011420558,0.001811632,0.00024424904,0.000008565876,0.00004043508,0.000032978398,0.000025831305,0.0024122093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586725,0.002541409,0.00009359678,0.00046857967,0.00042793492,0.00060121564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899642,0.0059029767,0.0016402302,0.0010500882,0.00082773494,0.00061480247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006677561,0.0003658913,0.00036320605,0.0021866506,0.009718045,0.008371222,0.0015403633,0.0023080606,0.006117175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013890578,0.00035126208,0.0006831959,0.0017384124,0.014801058,0.0119332075,0.009014706,0.003619432,0.00052926224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006242249,0.00017148114,0.02722153,0.00016743212,0.000036783742,0.0014190956,0.61601895,0.0013385649,0.0013350092,0.32834917,0.0019008603,0.02197868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022508413,0.000082380655,0.016360044,0.0003906094,0.00004979016,0.00045944474,0.6750591,0.010628456,0.002276793,0.21944934,0.07512851,0.000093020884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013614341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016893826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013614341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006995851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059228097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05075872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402335667","doi":"10.1177/00018392241273301","title":"The Dynamics of Inferential Interpretation in Experiential Learning: Deciphering Hidden Goals from Ambiguous Experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Interpretation (philosophy); Dynamics (music); Psychology; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02691596854887296,"score_gpt":0.3839776935376522,"score_spread":0.35706172498877925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402335667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5542874,0.00089036627,0.29866874,0.010690782,0.00012790516,0.00021378096,0.00011577982,0.00027922925,0.13472599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97963107,0.00014386764,0.018446727,0.00015951967,0.00001946274,0.0000684344,0.000037514914,0.0000612779,0.0014321216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98948544,0.007008125,0.00020698462,0.0009127818,0.0016239941,0.000762656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687789,0.024269175,0.0019417824,0.0031388057,0.00089570857,0.0009755751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008864809,0.0006508956,0.00052314,0.001719031,0.003414849,0.0092955325,0.0020253246,0.002226604,0.004870786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05088184,0.0007792365,0.0006511177,0.0011294994,0.036409702,0.019374155,0.010775379,0.0063321074,0.0005106954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023593863,0.00015861545,0.008380741,0.00021962325,0.000032192766,0.0008798798,0.29647538,0.0038845784,0.0044150893,0.644649,0.00088846113,0.039780423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043115553,0.000108550135,0.0054837526,0.00020948585,0.000024829547,0.00038331116,0.054792207,0.015166648,0.0027175103,0.9050334,0.015962496,0.000074717565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013194613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011022057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092955325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024192296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019610557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046882153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403342889","doi":"10.1177/00018392241287523","title":"Wasted? The Downstream Effects of Social Movement–Backed Occupations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Downstream (manufacturing); Movement (music); Economic geography; Business; Political science; Economics; Marketing; Physics","score_opus":0.018097449160991347,"score_gpt":0.35827612231743344,"score_spread":0.3401786731564421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403342889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94077474,0.00026722075,0.0021891412,0.0036353013,0.000057973037,0.000026441488,0.000051973333,0.000027155354,0.052970026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973392,0.000080138896,0.0002900655,0.00013312108,0.00001579858,0.000011398764,0.000017498427,0.000010271502,0.0021024456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552816,0.00241233,0.00011341779,0.000526202,0.0005023186,0.00091744005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918773,0.0038230498,0.0016230849,0.0008594069,0.0007565002,0.0010606836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004091414,0.0002860997,0.00027359123,0.001442041,0.0066750273,0.0057844245,0.00103543,0.0014206377,0.012909579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014908409,0.00031347832,0.00034194658,0.0011438314,0.009450979,0.004868794,0.0076624653,0.0017112682,0.00078652665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003833264,0.0007394781,0.33580312,0.0002409151,0.00008171054,0.002123834,0.41122475,0.0010150064,0.002431732,0.12393448,0.0037028035,0.118318886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042790893,0.00043160742,0.2575486,0.00045934186,0.000057788842,0.0005504837,0.640006,0.0008727723,0.0014278447,0.0474835,0.051044,0.000075358854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007101386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011848821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012909579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027963305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029658475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043186903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405822817","doi":"10.1177/00018392241303580","title":"<i>Harambee!</i> A Triadic Perspective on Social Impact: Organizations, Evaluators, and Target Beneficiaries in Kenya","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legitimation; Negotiation; Public relations; Dyad; Leverage (statistics); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Political science; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.023431953491781583,"score_gpt":0.3317225864397306,"score_spread":0.30829063294794906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405822817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39654276,0.019301947,0.005207221,0.22426142,0.0008782658,0.00034708084,0.00028187726,0.00003371749,0.35314578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639435,0.0061849304,0.0014674534,0.0062250216,0.0001000527,0.00017771714,0.00005207776,0.0000288163,0.021820322],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991364,0.000516096,0.00002454113,0.000052836887,0.000081663624,0.00018845961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879324,0.0006731381,0.00018826756,0.000035702837,0.00011371764,0.0001959705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017257507,0.00024471205,0.00019276307,0.0010589649,0.013416725,0.0061803744,0.0005846042,0.0017501245,0.008254995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020340097,0.0002509302,0.00012336281,0.0012937203,0.008919064,0.010985803,0.0034227383,0.0021615988,0.0003786092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007879336,0.000114247145,0.015427263,0.00047043807,0.000011548283,0.0026397428,0.5863954,0.00014406715,0.0015449788,0.3229753,0.03994853,0.030249694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017187742,0.000054790893,0.03182483,0.0012931047,0.000026058891,0.00067237596,0.5620997,0.00032880463,0.00081695477,0.035050277,0.36774358,0.000072387265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045624413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12269514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045624413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059331725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041518332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09071767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407935352","doi":"10.1177/00018392251320898","title":"When Breaking the Law Gets You the Job: Evidence from the Electronic Dance Music Community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Dance; Action (physics); Electronic dance music; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Sociology; Collective action; Law; Political science; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.1008740551161321,"score_gpt":0.36282691985175236,"score_spread":0.2619528647356203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407935352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951509,0.00022888805,0.00011848809,0.0008086827,0.0000080189375,0.000021581905,0.000063200576,0.0000018340875,0.0035982006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989644,0.00021185013,0.00010761485,0.00024583298,0.000013920334,0.000023708932,0.00005771293,0.0000037642023,0.00037121846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870227,0.007549102,0.00063330523,0.0013511619,0.0018618137,0.0015820224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8622695,0.071309514,0.043433405,0.008448363,0.007767014,0.0067721233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012101155,0.00033248382,0.00055695587,0.002773287,0.0045066937,0.004778838,0.002013171,0.0023502838,0.006159612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06669147,0.0006168681,0.0003825183,0.0028809921,0.008036856,0.004146433,0.007825876,0.0024245002,0.0009394268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005350679,0.0018674645,0.7093331,0.0003866518,0.00020217849,0.00095622527,0.25048393,0.00013234175,0.0004952483,0.0037263175,0.0019082665,0.029973209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010645765,0.0004007044,0.6518721,0.00037368102,0.000095513795,0.0002952316,0.33968186,0.00042733058,0.00031970406,0.001462399,0.0049100057,0.00005507886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021813955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03404599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021813955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014826823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021483982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063997805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408537030","doi":"10.1177/00018392251321843","title":"Peer Influence in the Workplace: The Moderating Role of Task Structures Within Organizations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Task (project management); Social psychology; Moderation; Public relations; Applied psychology; Management; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.009887591015529254,"score_gpt":0.2811173738879225,"score_spread":0.27122978287239324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408537030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98980343,0.00030728645,0.0015857435,0.001109473,0.000029936895,0.000031126834,0.000038619783,0.000010244668,0.007084026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999537,0.000042848616,0.00018889998,0.000033735218,0.000014469141,0.000009741425,0.00000779612,0.000002531778,0.00016302997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98742825,0.008659644,0.0003751389,0.00094224233,0.0014978455,0.001096841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94619095,0.036616948,0.007917562,0.002223981,0.0019672476,0.005083355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005001413,0.00038985428,0.00048813043,0.00092523673,0.0024989995,0.0026202032,0.0006019085,0.00069768,0.0030313965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03522716,0.00018479496,0.00039120123,0.00072103937,0.0019213969,0.0011227032,0.0028380111,0.000962229,0.00018985837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030073238,0.00052395195,0.92258084,0.00016248442,0.00032485617,0.00024092823,0.039212007,0.00059344555,0.0014573255,0.0041627795,0.00055111246,0.029889558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030714185,0.00031565662,0.9704221,0.00012212885,0.00015196051,0.00009120531,0.020722039,0.0019115559,0.00044923322,0.0029765326,0.0027808025,0.000026187588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011223338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013943589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011223338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012617199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026593464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026450276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410059858","doi":"10.1177/00018392251333696","title":"Organizational Emplacement as a Response to Digital Threat: The Novel Resurgence of Independent Bookstores","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oregon; McGill University; George Washington University; University of Southern California","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Business; Narrative; Mechanism (biology); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030247310543201983,"score_gpt":0.31500568971757925,"score_spread":0.2847583791743773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410059858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92103845,0.00056039053,0.0026309134,0.0046389895,0.00008856643,0.000020739622,0.000036871035,0.000026223566,0.07095877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942789,0.0001492542,0.00031603835,0.00021139749,0.000022793181,0.000007930116,0.000012724654,0.000016566066,0.0049843774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997143,0.0016249758,0.00005854101,0.00030580297,0.0004933497,0.00037440975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428445,0.0027268187,0.0010065583,0.0009395116,0.00040581403,0.00063680724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002888308,0.00031015716,0.00025022373,0.0019981985,0.010333272,0.008232566,0.0012759331,0.0016516164,0.005060596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066902805,0.00029803827,0.0002932484,0.0015504528,0.031416524,0.009643703,0.0076615703,0.002627872,0.00060607627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007530644,0.000049010312,0.011492393,0.00006631234,0.000012435432,0.0019823401,0.8658219,0.00020923543,0.0012591734,0.101896904,0.0030469615,0.014088047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009265774,0.00006237888,0.010640506,0.000117781776,0.000009786131,0.0008896849,0.866693,0.00038832976,0.0012745429,0.011443194,0.10843334,0.000038170016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055912687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012104485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010333272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039634597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001645321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028757036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411692997","doi":"10.1177/00018392251343515","title":"Art for Whose Sake? Managing Professional Autonomy and Empowered Clients in the Porcelain Capital of China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Administrative Science Quarterly","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; China; Capital (architecture); Sociology; Business; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Management; Economics; Art; Visual arts; Law","score_opus":0.014698248501679043,"score_gpt":0.3389482947171385,"score_spread":0.32425004621545944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411692997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885533,0.00021977881,0.00018522861,0.001519704,0.000011423465,0.000017690056,0.00000804822,0.0000065437803,0.009478351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996971,0.00008642516,0.00007792709,0.000094233714,0.0000033655563,0.000004451742,0.0000044854805,0.0000024200376,0.002755702],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986613,0.00033006092,0.00004508785,0.00013224685,0.0002438205,0.0005874329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988605,0.00029384636,0.00014503564,0.00008675501,0.000089802445,0.0005240941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020604255,0.00022688798,0.00027684198,0.0009476046,0.01013863,0.0028751583,0.0010634465,0.0006666792,0.0055269157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019204443,0.00019346923,0.0001335315,0.0010564815,0.0063139126,0.0017239511,0.003804816,0.0010042116,0.00019828438],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009241194,0.00012177002,0.08100153,0.000189668,0.000016729084,0.0033188253,0.7938114,0.00029649225,0.0027488181,0.0302684,0.0047264453,0.08340746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002919757,0.00012352642,0.13705905,0.00024016114,0.000028836888,0.0009418996,0.7552475,0.0030635758,0.0012184947,0.008424972,0.09355408,0.00006864051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06462097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13079278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06462097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061823223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009724098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12848967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}