{"meta":{"query_hash":"fcb698a2e4b2","filters":{"venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fcb698a2e4b2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=African+Human+Rights+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1552017093","doi":"","title":"The African Union and the responsibility to protect","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Human rights; Sovereignty; Law; International law; State responsibility; Political science; International community; International human rights law; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Commission; Summit; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Crimes against humanity; Sociology; Politics; War crime","score_opus":0.009912849249436754,"score_gpt":0.28724380447218467,"score_spread":0.2773309552227479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552017093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8162652,0.00004064393,0.00003173779,0.034522492,0.00041763866,0.0006109964,0.0000045196352,0.000040035193,0.14806673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822515,0.000008466183,0.00010495869,0.00023414653,0.0004125167,0.000011498722,3.0201755e-7,0.000006415258,0.0009965603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973964,0.001189551,0.00026257767,0.00018819718,0.0005241153,0.00043914275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859595,0.00043989034,0.00014216446,0.00033073258,0.00018455445,0.00030670455],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060017304,0.00011990738,0.00015914494,0.000037112724,0.011829473,0.0007067365,0.0006669559,0.00008030809,0.000056980032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000255949,0.000056104025,0.00009236932,0.00024051798,0.0022871257,0.00017079919,0.00008934379,0.0008044032,0.000013023265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008657435,0.000019275298,0.000048042253,5.8169235e-7,0.000012544886,0.0000058498754,0.013070524,6.14961e-7,0.000064443855,0.98546785,0.0006772905,0.00054643024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031212356,0.000060597093,0.0010211429,0.0000050065523,0.000012764396,0.00001815237,0.0033866134,0.000009908994,0.000009236407,0.3750548,0.62001497,0.00009469754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014947919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5518984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6193377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000759934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008246555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1703486188","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of fundamental rights and the standing rules under the Nigerian Constitution : a need for a more liberal provision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Anachronism; Enforcement; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Expansive; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02036352092857403,"score_gpt":0.3175825170209664,"score_spread":0.2972189960923924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1703486188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7424304,0.00068541634,0.0011974513,0.008685735,0.00065217895,0.0024388966,0.000058707403,0.000079034566,0.2437722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834406,0.0000037270204,0.0003848205,0.00018884888,0.0004405,0.000013022105,0.0000033307783,0.0000051066418,0.0006165558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815744,0.000283887,0.00041583672,0.0001680275,0.00059908425,0.00037572713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989904,0.00022426774,0.00034648145,0.00016647318,0.00013067397,0.00014167432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012440158,0.00015483888,0.0002513307,0.00006121572,0.0064418544,0.0003945395,0.00038076355,0.00006797216,0.0001414048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016556169,0.00007273536,0.00013891133,0.00012451317,0.0029081013,0.0003561966,0.000037521073,0.00024057466,0.0000016339923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015065934,0.00003801735,0.000015507812,0.0000026441592,0.0000398364,0.0000031799198,0.07339613,0.0000089436335,0.000040717554,0.925808,0.0004092692,0.00008707523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025561063,0.00030847837,0.00011788848,0.00007560678,0.00010154993,0.000017040893,0.015079363,0.000059141945,0.00013703482,0.78409415,0.19726709,0.00018652632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026026878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003097698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2559137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022132814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073366384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837354806","doi":"","title":"Revisiting corporate violations of human rights in Nigeria's Niger Delta region: Canvassing the potential role of the International Criminal Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Human rights; State (computer science); International community; Law; International law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); International human rights law; Niger delta; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.044904497486280844,"score_gpt":0.27936297213703304,"score_spread":0.2344584746507522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837354806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86588347,0.00002310726,0.0000482273,0.00030023634,0.00049575494,0.00017925433,0.00001061844,0.000013210037,0.13304612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975035,0.0000011931195,0.00012160753,0.000043586155,0.0010310925,0.00000540086,0.0000057119896,0.000012050304,0.0012758592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970939,0.0004843373,0.0008783774,0.00022571432,0.000967443,0.0003501882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975014,0.00008589457,0.0013509626,0.00027585408,0.0006780354,0.000107870175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010781457,0.00018429931,0.000284868,0.00017505373,0.0049595037,0.0001658766,0.0012992158,0.00009911797,0.00095756905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015354719,0.00010735114,0.00025636153,0.00015096093,0.0012612453,0.0004396359,0.00009807738,0.0004859229,0.000004306804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028274504,0.00009281122,0.0017834561,0.0000033692804,0.00006614824,0.000033603334,0.011854871,0.000011653124,0.00058858714,0.98540324,0.00010398913,0.000029986739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052713795,0.00006741496,0.022620725,0.0002732158,0.00008661019,0.000078936144,0.0017886736,0.000040564493,0.0018699422,0.9625236,0.009886871,0.00023635378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024637217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15346712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13177027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022132734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013515392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189940831","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2015/v15n1a6","title":"Cultural rights versus human rights: A critical analysis of the trokosi practice in Ghana and the role of civil society","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Civil rights; Fundamental rights; Civil society; Right to property; Cultural rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.034512036751035896,"score_gpt":0.35500164891418245,"score_spread":0.32048961216314653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189940831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6696306,0.0011000609,0.0000073835126,0.0021402831,0.0002593552,0.0002712064,0.000024130903,0.000022085018,0.3265449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876726,0.0000070484534,0.00016279981,0.000054630356,0.00037049805,0.0000066257917,0.0000021529224,0.000008136595,0.0006208293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579036,0.0015855368,0.00072422554,0.00026164998,0.0011528471,0.00048536493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969879,0.0012714905,0.00058287545,0.00033368953,0.0005573438,0.00026674502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024218718,0.00021310858,0.000646446,0.00011034327,0.0035870625,0.00022098239,0.0007567969,0.00013052953,0.00022549812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017882366,0.000102555845,0.00042991372,0.0008065969,0.004792427,0.0006216633,0.00012080269,0.00052555476,0.0000013907623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012285498,0.00012981074,0.00011611091,0.0000029168154,0.00051093166,0.000005606052,0.15490593,0.000005724869,0.000013337705,0.84355766,0.0006157884,0.000013311731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034793299,0.00034352893,0.00045265874,0.000058757316,0.0020247498,0.00001414274,0.34842646,0.000096475655,0.00012835312,0.30182722,0.34276977,0.0003785156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10248965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3615059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54173046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019913136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007986964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748923407","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2017/v17n1a11","title":"The responsibility of businesses to prevent development-induced displacement in Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Displacement (psychology); Political science; Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04809977718507971,"score_gpt":0.3457820178228826,"score_spread":0.2976822406378029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748923407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8386968,0.000013734918,0.000011404492,0.0030574494,0.0003722097,0.00021927392,0.0000011227529,0.0000073338106,0.15762068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954843,0.0000034525078,0.00032341754,0.000018235878,0.00014488364,0.000013083899,5.390155e-7,0.0000051779825,0.0040069376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981635,0.00020414114,0.00045419743,0.0001570478,0.00066914613,0.00035192532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988684,0.0001397472,0.00034686612,0.00023603963,0.00028043773,0.0001284964],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024237607,0.00010382864,0.00015160372,0.00008617663,0.0066439295,0.00035863364,0.0009235756,0.000038786977,0.00015034036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019275692,0.000065435066,0.00004916679,0.00009657817,0.00027649553,0.00028711,0.00012666882,0.00015789477,0.0000177754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116228584,0.00023001627,0.0018110005,0.0000042289807,0.000048875023,0.000022454875,0.022098863,0.0000021977282,0.0006015654,0.97316366,0.0007668447,0.0011340523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054595247,0.000087685905,0.16793032,0.00018727782,0.000011223524,0.0000032784678,0.0019649789,0.0000012748084,0.005770375,0.12342091,0.6997699,0.00030678455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001990891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12341453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84974277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031568683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027530198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951141538","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2019/v19n1a1","title":"Confidentiality and the implementation of the decisions of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Commission; Confidentiality; Human rights; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027231844342015792,"score_gpt":0.3353544337815853,"score_spread":0.3081225894395695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951141538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94450754,0.00002745983,0.0000074853356,0.0010693144,0.00024114107,0.0005092312,0.000009369355,0.000006712456,0.053621747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984557,0.000008650376,0.000021195468,0.000056849352,0.000101218175,0.0000040305845,8.0156053e-7,0.00000654337,0.0013450194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726766,0.0008916178,0.00056591304,0.0001902982,0.00083566655,0.00024884273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998293,0.00043884595,0.00061990245,0.00035752088,0.00016541447,0.00012532658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015627206,0.00014774418,0.00029499363,0.000057896286,0.006312383,0.00017092978,0.0006126548,0.0000596323,0.0008195634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015506428,0.00005540351,0.00014293502,0.00016515992,0.001754454,0.00014011943,0.00015317604,0.0002895896,0.0000024683509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002251044,0.000042001706,0.0013967976,0.0000041990165,0.000039925744,5.5107756e-7,0.037970368,6.366346e-7,0.00015223694,0.95978516,0.00047604437,0.000109582805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034568727,0.00018985428,0.16545457,0.000247563,0.00014487337,0.000016554732,0.02351025,0.0000024138528,0.0021030742,0.69456476,0.11002788,0.00028133293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019564524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17177333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26522037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072186835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102529266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953734689","doi":"","title":"The International Ombudsman Yearbook, Linda C. Reif (Ed.) : recent publications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yearbook; Parliament; Political science; Law; Library science; Politics","score_opus":0.02551074843048468,"score_gpt":0.2969614081440274,"score_spread":0.2714506597135427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953734689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03700643,0.000157001,0.00003378768,0.01139787,0.0013072337,0.00021427694,0.000007022992,0.00014507108,0.9497313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92478293,0.00007581071,0.00014142581,0.00014401483,0.0045317276,0.000014199643,0.000014872184,0.000021303047,0.070273735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973265,0.00025443203,0.00054072036,0.00027522704,0.0010112148,0.00059192476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998374,0.00015784033,0.0003550009,0.000352452,0.00048757516,0.0002731471],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012097623,0.0001794067,0.00016859813,0.00014671484,0.012472094,0.0016997055,0.0013393065,0.00010379142,0.0036989409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025150779,0.00011561178,0.00016592527,0.00020407327,0.0010665411,0.000493141,0.00007128529,0.0005449658,0.0003422331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006255031,0.00008869013,0.00013365281,4.571454e-7,0.00003444324,0.000011637223,0.001116637,0.0000019259883,0.000014431164,0.92022145,0.07794857,0.00042183165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021618482,0.000022255592,0.0013054339,0.000008169159,0.000014510672,0.000012388548,0.00029727857,0.0000028401757,0.000033278233,0.31571302,0.68224245,0.0001321983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00459609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.270146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8877765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041363126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016101482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133647049","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2020/v20n2a8","title":"Assessing the implications of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 for human rights and the rule of law in South Africa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Derogation; International human rights law; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Data Protection Act 1998; Freedom of information; Law; Fundamental rights; Political science; Reservation of rights; Digital rights; Transparency (behavior); Privacy law; Right to property; Internet privacy; Computer security; Information privacy; Computer science; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.062368943323764234,"score_gpt":0.33912521634518034,"score_spread":0.2767562730214161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133647049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49556735,0.0005230584,0.46135512,0.006234374,0.0002492683,0.0021476918,0.00022692392,0.000114191535,0.03358201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982131,2.0696459e-7,0.0013492823,0.0002161147,0.00008682274,0.000047959664,0.000006447931,0.000015262605,0.000064801556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785393,0.00015676446,0.00086817564,0.00038753156,0.00031883467,0.00041475575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579626,0.0024529432,0.0006558695,0.0005807059,0.00032937582,0.00018482968],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00100984,0.0002203844,0.00048656584,0.00012662086,0.0026672755,0.0013728873,0.00096031127,0.00006305117,0.0000057224756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010755551,0.00012867655,0.00029319606,0.0002938521,0.0004641763,0.0015477164,0.00017286598,0.0002808585,3.0194397e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021062526,0.00009133583,0.000103712606,0.000060153045,0.00006258091,0.000008623736,0.012292915,0.00004355665,0.0008859876,0.986315,0.00001948957,0.00009554614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036327054,0.00018028019,0.0009850026,0.00016049182,0.000082784434,0.000111993206,0.0007045966,0.00056072004,0.0025354312,0.97985345,0.010909322,0.00028323865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040325575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036155805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50264573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016112255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019267779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214528536","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2021/v21n2a27","title":"The African human rights system as 'norm leader': Three case studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Norm (philosophy); Charter; Linguistic rights; Right to property; Sociology; Political science; Right to development; Law and economics; International law","score_opus":0.05744218261963283,"score_gpt":0.3361059648354983,"score_spread":0.27866378221586546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214528536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4537126,0.0012874331,0.000028472796,0.0019475151,0.001691979,0.00048215876,0.000009750622,0.00026121287,0.54057884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783543,0.000020100364,0.00015754116,0.00009603215,0.002152445,0.00003619522,0.00000399486,0.00003817653,0.019141218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433714,0.00091668684,0.0011407002,0.0006469729,0.0015995294,0.0013589632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965039,0.00045666684,0.0006172417,0.00067103904,0.0010045331,0.0007466123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021951203,0.0005004505,0.00072302617,0.00016046473,0.053356662,0.0015471597,0.0009911362,0.00018650854,0.00080143573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003371941,0.00027833044,0.00037924421,0.0004765408,0.002333348,0.00052476703,0.00021011304,0.00088636734,0.0002588331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001114243,0.000098769204,0.00002550399,0.000016890646,0.0004200973,0.014927445,0.030264497,0.0000016077139,0.000019299754,0.94945014,0.0046247616,0.00013983423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006274749,0.00014226357,0.00007186079,0.00014754359,0.00014170837,0.004146321,0.04353719,0.0000019082345,0.00021796788,0.32009318,0.63030714,0.00056543294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011627203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64766306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63603586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012980155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003407226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291142822","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2022/v22n1a2","title":"Responsiveness of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement to diet-related non-communicable diseases: A human rights analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; South African Medical Research Council; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Human rights; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Free trade; International trade; Law; Business; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.016286903957252248,"score_gpt":0.28036000287389407,"score_spread":0.2640730989166418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291142822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90516037,0.00008447337,0.00002469158,0.0025755502,0.0004648432,0.00088119897,0.00015072331,0.00005723504,0.090600945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938061,0.0000015312997,0.00011130689,0.00014891726,0.00016112754,0.00007435674,0.000022030135,0.000023708908,0.0056509157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936032,0.00186214,0.0011578029,0.00048397892,0.0020510314,0.0008418081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704903,0.0001961057,0.0007895136,0.0011541562,0.0001769095,0.0006342661],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017493563,0.00035695042,0.00084598904,0.00054239057,0.02241033,0.00027559404,0.003148087,0.00008089421,0.0060731964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017883816,0.00022952018,0.00075872644,0.0018541259,0.001040128,0.00024907922,0.00082633813,0.0007607927,0.000011607539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036234423,0.0014464471,0.0018836901,0.000011151751,0.002294974,0.00020160002,0.0844104,0.00054757023,0.00040585842,0.8979609,0.010438584,0.00003646001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027806452,0.001083978,0.051561944,0.00007440439,0.0015644759,0.000019739942,0.013699923,0.00002659343,0.00033483765,0.18000674,0.74778676,0.0010599409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022823159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15154718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7373482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090763695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020962847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125956686","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2025/v25n2a3","title":"Repairing transgenerational harm in the Ongwen case before the International Criminal Court: The next frontier in reparative justice for international crimes?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Transgenerational epigenetics; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Scholarship; International law","score_opus":0.05626419873818467,"score_gpt":0.36421294834412626,"score_spread":0.3079487496059416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125956686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5441186,0.0005563474,0.001836965,0.08346296,0.01798546,0.0031836978,0.00031853103,0.00005340876,0.34848404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97729486,0.000020486366,0.0003179391,0.002367454,0.006244242,0.00021122226,0.000047735066,0.000026011314,0.013470043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371755,0.0012098654,0.0017350961,0.00071793154,0.0017953063,0.00082426815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959591,0.0012480074,0.0007667678,0.00046721334,0.0014295714,0.00012931084],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052002305,0.0005224466,0.0004629944,0.00045200431,0.01033203,0.0025636235,0.0034893595,0.00023250541,0.0014683264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019845284,0.00027872712,0.0005841691,0.00034439279,0.0017769635,0.0013776222,0.00015225347,0.0017607174,0.000018230467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028419428,0.0004027698,0.00006172566,0.000015185626,0.00040271535,0.00060462655,0.06997628,0.0003840209,0.000009446643,0.9140655,0.013612116,0.0001814351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022960186,0.00019744608,0.0012777456,0.00028397783,0.00060314615,0.0007944241,0.03182685,0.0047202795,0.00006170062,0.5160025,0.441502,0.00043389347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058051553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3040411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43317628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012778721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005308183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125973927","doi":"10.17159/1996-2096/2025/v25n2a20","title":"Special Focus: Implementation of Decisions of The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Focus (optics); International human rights law; High Court; Constitutional court; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.029223672163838435,"score_gpt":0.3387977388329424,"score_spread":0.309574066669104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125973927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67806715,0.000097393124,0.000044253364,0.0014250925,0.0017233446,0.00083456025,0.00007430492,0.000016330381,0.31771755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484336,0.000048026614,0.00014151938,0.00006975265,0.0019814733,0.000010549947,0.0000037090756,0.000020654914,0.0028809768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937556,0.0009177967,0.0021275736,0.0006183687,0.0017429445,0.00083771633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600786,0.0006364161,0.0017281432,0.00060578843,0.00061396364,0.00040781187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016542703,0.0005259912,0.00097080966,0.0005439346,0.012507264,0.00038760595,0.0013254663,0.00023169529,0.004503219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029768342,0.0003126456,0.00048693654,0.0008789337,0.002833825,0.00037188,0.0002940135,0.000747664,0.000010170597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005364379,0.000386704,0.00049111416,0.000018651159,0.00028849184,0.0000146110315,0.03988888,0.0000022584377,0.00010989591,0.94755316,0.010111503,0.0010811184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024785162,0.00071228534,0.03147113,0.00080436154,0.00041840487,0.000013585608,0.018342644,0.0000014785902,0.0029377316,0.7030572,0.23921153,0.000551124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012963717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38511717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37215346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005093888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006705702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}