{"meta":{"query_hash":"ff8957ac9a51","filters":{"venue":"African Journal of Ecology"},"cohort_total":72,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":72,"exported":72,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ff8957ac9a51","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=African+Journal+of+Ecology"},"results":[{"id":"W1484704179","doi":"10.1046/j.0141-6707.2001.00337.x","title":"Bushbuck (<i>Tragelaphus scriptus</i> Pallas) habitat in Mole National Park, northern Ghana","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; National park; Habitat; Thicket; Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.014291232805648249,"score_gpt":0.1994416540411204,"score_spread":0.18515042123547215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484704179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804051,0.00008174291,0.000033559238,0.0052157925,0.00032757595,0.00007369251,0.000002288473,0.000005945866,0.013854292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969995,0.000025716321,0.00039586268,0.0020133054,0.00008689504,0.0000066523285,8.0094304e-7,0.0000084391995,0.00046283478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987141,0.00017579373,0.00044300288,0.00015667256,0.00022939325,0.00028105767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920964,0.00025809294,0.00030372938,0.00008608095,0.00004622828,0.00009620867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005213748,0.00010710812,0.00021101571,0.000095010175,0.000080223275,0.0000096120875,0.000270772,0.00010754588,0.0032147798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003066536,0.00010122236,0.00006983086,0.00029871037,0.0002016513,0.00023837539,0.000050377537,0.00027141703,0.00045578412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026789921,0.00018347295,0.9819179,0.0000015183995,0.000017555672,0.0000955867,0.00035772295,0.0013143655,0.00013094611,0.00010184612,0.015316315,0.0005359332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006855022,0.0002946049,0.9929667,0.0000059461017,0.00001100255,0.0001335925,0.00022552621,0.0005053772,0.000018701063,0.0016728947,0.0033717582,0.0001083952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029817915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012985116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016594384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032826635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004658644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495618897","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01280.x","title":"Influence of environmental conditions on sex allocation in the black rhinoceros population of Mkhuze Game Reserve, South Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex allocation; Rhinoceros; Population; Sex ratio; Game reserve; Geography; Demography; Biology; Ecology; Wildlife","score_opus":0.02154681565478835,"score_gpt":0.21961351894087652,"score_spread":0.19806670328608816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495618897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980221,0.000004817871,0.000007747581,0.00028218058,0.000033065695,0.00014107584,0.000009566967,0.0000018288051,0.0014976369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996311,0.0000068040217,0.00009818338,0.00019499195,0.0000123084255,0.0000060681814,0.0000035447629,0.000004738317,0.000042242842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987345,0.00029363245,0.00052698207,0.00011130716,0.00018709055,0.0001465223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887764,0.00021186608,0.00069840136,0.00016406234,0.000013596072,0.000034437686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000633566,0.00008102231,0.00018750216,0.000104712766,0.00004248592,0.0000020907462,0.0003027536,0.00008607154,0.00061784056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013502504,0.000064031774,0.000053000895,0.00019475022,0.00038950384,0.00019644339,0.000039748633,0.0001794165,0.00002980141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008845908,0.00028248527,0.98197705,0.0000027948713,0.000014211388,0.0000054720767,0.008897455,0.00684826,0.001360435,0.00034505618,0.00013300458,0.000045341498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034856,0.00072833966,0.9942187,0.000008493746,0.000022965529,0.0000126818895,0.0015442813,0.000083345774,0.00025739428,0.0026938762,0.000027251283,0.00005408619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007762007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017406214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009502324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019823341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6764921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1704291021","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01262.x","title":"Vigilance and grouping in the southern African ground squirrel (<i>Xerus inauris</i>)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Central Florida; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Foraging; Ground squirrel; Predation; Psychology; Biology; Ecology; Cognitive psychology; Squirrel monkey","score_opus":0.02630734219058662,"score_gpt":0.22362149425228706,"score_spread":0.19731415206170044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1704291021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98986626,0.00013638937,0.000021269912,0.0005380706,0.00011894682,0.000079302685,0.0000011493539,0.000003932457,0.009234694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990303,0.000050554703,0.00037974422,0.00040982597,0.000036528265,0.0000071091854,8.138775e-8,0.0000064362184,0.000079413614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989666,0.00017609702,0.00031338137,0.00014557625,0.000111380534,0.00028700015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939907,0.00016743399,0.0002700892,0.00009765536,0.000011315708,0.00005445889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006948481,0.0001113744,0.00024661658,0.000053739626,0.0001506939,0.000008288047,0.00033363764,0.00006925366,0.0004132031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058850623,0.00007397193,0.000048000973,0.00017825181,0.0006282928,0.00012887477,0.0001365891,0.00030002627,0.000047547397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009686388,0.00016334381,0.98156476,0.0000021726785,0.000015310678,0.00021850946,0.016078461,0.0000028982602,0.0002256215,0.00035010953,0.00020437178,0.0010775969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031307116,0.0007514202,0.9828632,0.0000045513816,0.000032212127,0.00028891914,0.013016634,0.0000039498404,0.000009265414,0.001863072,0.0007654545,0.00008825277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020298123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022473847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009164061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000688791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012129729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4524284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867126876","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2010.01212.x","title":"Diversity and aboveground biomass in three tropical forest types in the Dja Biosphere Reserve, Cameroon","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie; Royal Society","keywords":"Basal area; Biomass (ecology); Context (archaeology); Forestry; Deforestation (computer science); Abundance (ecology); Diversity index; Species diversity; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Species richness","score_opus":0.01062193718302156,"score_gpt":0.20855124940184774,"score_spread":0.19792931221882618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867126876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995198,0.000020530411,0.000024335763,0.0024425075,0.00017204782,0.00009399589,4.6869522e-7,0.0000016325962,0.0020464715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999471,0.000012811516,0.00021849632,0.0002327251,0.000023688046,0.0000020472633,1.415372e-7,0.000002630604,0.000036426147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993158,0.00009281929,0.0001861339,0.00010906739,0.000097883094,0.0001983176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995674,0.00016181194,0.00011281945,0.000107472435,0.0000058971573,0.00004461409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048433337,0.00006609208,0.00014094291,0.000052782638,0.00018961175,0.000006734969,0.00035388043,0.000082558494,0.00046237724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009217137,0.00004473509,0.000027245705,0.0001467526,0.00040419155,0.00012297364,0.0006016072,0.00033217852,0.000015774538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054887485,0.00009866995,0.9946592,0.0000019800787,0.000008390917,0.00016154292,0.0005672702,0.00004297994,0.0000939795,0.0037694462,0.00035390104,0.00018778737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046861893,0.0003553859,0.9812709,0.0000017049654,0.000010212406,0.000046460533,0.00026111066,0.00006228829,0.000005443604,0.016217332,0.001253078,0.000047431637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009998478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43429992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43330005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000984472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5760226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970408099","doi":"10.1046/j.0141-6707.2000.00299.x","title":"The conflict between vervet monkeys and farmers at the forest edge in Entebbe, Uganda","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Crop; Geography; Agriculture; Agroforestry; Biology; Forestry; Archaeology","score_opus":0.042846591438851854,"score_gpt":0.3218917958440667,"score_spread":0.27904520440521485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970408099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848581,0.0006736368,0.000009423122,0.005043042,0.00094105303,0.00015602418,0.0000070613364,0.000005800734,0.0083058635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977955,0.0003848169,0.000008431475,0.0003664771,0.00016741011,0.000015673348,0.0000019854717,0.000015464277,0.0012442028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982352,0.00039967382,0.00056070456,0.00016801349,0.000097991055,0.0005383964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796087,0.0012293855,0.0003776556,0.0002434908,0.00006712253,0.00012148032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085798156,0.00014390892,0.00037182,0.00013281523,0.00025414643,0.00002119897,0.00044393723,0.00015433067,0.0007261159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000930637,0.00008524387,0.0000953756,0.00017901152,0.00050859555,0.000057839614,0.00013376024,0.00046162456,0.00007548828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024950766,0.000060716215,0.98756355,0.0000011411282,0.00009950076,0.00024828085,0.0012650902,0.000005207558,0.000070152004,0.0005403081,0.005548131,0.0043484326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001368704,0.00056979904,0.9040366,0.000002596678,0.000073695956,0.0007879963,0.0022192781,0.0000019056753,0.000010406217,0.00042920487,0.090417065,0.000082777944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012050575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031843367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08486893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013570327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005823921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79504603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971117239","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00903.x","title":"Habitat selection, diet and interspecific associations of the rufous‐tailed weaver and Fischer’s lovebird","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Starling; Biology; Habitat; Flock; Interspecific competition; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.020240867040853466,"score_gpt":0.22770573039357977,"score_spread":0.20746486335272632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971117239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99699205,0.00006449806,0.00000968609,0.0013619036,0.000115693365,0.000050299874,0.0000024916196,0.0000022139259,0.0014011539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924654,0.00009874174,0.00021870372,0.00009481635,0.000019836993,0.0000014066254,7.261548e-8,0.0000035803337,0.0003163098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941164,0.00008819691,0.00022264331,0.00008262828,0.00007502679,0.000119860204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994526,0.00015761312,0.0002801754,0.0000411114,0.00003091091,0.000037620124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018178228,0.000061831575,0.00018168881,0.000026750648,0.00021291472,0.000002682158,0.000091971255,0.000055904886,0.00031166902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013701107,0.000041879783,0.00004490823,0.00011075713,0.0006663897,0.00007742093,0.00010944283,0.00016351095,0.000007183509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003414865,0.00006247058,0.99355483,6.7047046e-7,0.00003097143,0.0000051505126,0.0009689284,0.000007771891,0.0009375533,0.000050581595,0.0042801453,0.00006679232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024481112,0.00069321314,0.99713755,0.0000019450395,0.0000387451,0.00012863798,0.00062877446,0.000005538621,0.000065572916,0.00024204238,0.00077143096,0.000041745683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013356816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010540109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035827272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007962514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016990127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34125572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985342539","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00664.x","title":"The role of area enclosures and fallow age in the restoration of plant diversity in northern Ethiopia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Recherche Industrielle du Québec; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet","keywords":"Species richness; Forb; Soil seed bank; Biodiversity; Rangeland; Ecological succession; Species diversity; Herbaceous plant; Restoration ecology; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Agroforestry; Agronomy; Grassland; Germination","score_opus":0.008021753888613615,"score_gpt":0.18353198573813762,"score_spread":0.175510231849524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985342539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956124,0.00006675658,0.0000042256984,0.00046026253,0.000035131216,0.0000816025,0.0000011766718,4.904796e-7,0.003737997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998723,0.000038988237,0.000028795092,0.000016972072,0.000009908094,0.0000012625569,5.586097e-7,0.0000011899963,0.000029979574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937874,0.00016918874,0.00021301357,0.000050281258,0.000094293,0.000094458774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945307,0.00024365181,0.00022865944,0.000057852012,0.000006165672,0.000010579817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006370057,0.000039168794,0.00011596867,0.000048800983,0.000061711406,0.0000031568893,0.00019835257,0.000033826163,0.00001820383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003509168,0.000022888204,0.000021072907,0.00009096319,0.00018486046,0.000050511473,0.00009621104,0.00009899833,6.825931e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054932836,0.000056044082,0.99647087,0.0000011897793,0.0000052635337,0.000023106313,0.0013475012,0.00047590162,0.00037353305,0.00064540416,0.000206913,0.00033935093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026182292,0.00027590132,0.9901899,0.0000023234934,0.00000863986,0.00000732116,0.0017212922,0.000026761041,0.00001913577,0.0060709836,0.0013931778,0.000022702785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007484146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.200516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19976757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032217024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007892135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8140725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992117813","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.01016.x","title":"Enrichment planting does not improve tree restoration when compared with natural regeneration in a former pine plantation in Kibale National Park, Uganda","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Species richness; Ecological succession; National park; Sowing; Agroforestry; Biomass (ecology); Deforestation (computer science); Natural regeneration; Afforestation; Forestry; Regeneration (biology); Tree planting; Introduced species; Forest restoration; Secondary succession; Geography; Biology; Agronomy; Ecology; Forest ecology","score_opus":0.01121485563890727,"score_gpt":0.2073221493120726,"score_spread":0.19610729367316532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992117813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995481,0.000010067843,0.00013242687,0.0032115602,0.00011555903,0.00015379563,0.0000036426545,0.0000035301864,0.00088841765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981583,0.000011156936,0.0011672797,0.00040180804,0.000051464824,0.0000014391992,0.000017069975,0.0000020734265,0.00018942438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990535,0.00007946286,0.0003222646,0.00012842334,0.00027158594,0.00014475727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951357,0.00005559055,0.00031719747,0.00004517859,0.000036176185,0.00003230061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000436085,0.00008010018,0.0001457567,0.00017702949,0.00007672666,0.000022037719,0.00010536133,0.000034965655,0.00005888398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003841168,0.000057867717,0.000021621081,0.00015310547,0.000043762022,0.00025591804,0.00002427789,0.00011784804,0.000004021686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063910533,0.00021083964,0.9613933,0.0000054316374,0.000018453848,0.000044188997,0.004966608,0.0086562205,0.019834032,0.000051120085,0.00058176665,0.0035989352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014216464,0.00036541375,0.9927338,0.000011822218,0.000011038615,0.000015708723,0.0011444144,0.0027324504,0.00071472325,0.00027136243,0.0004921652,0.000085486325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012497237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009052772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031340472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037993232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031440894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50516593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998868187","doi":"10.1111/aje.12180","title":"<scp>AFRICLIM</scp> : high‐resolution climate projections for ecological applications in <scp>A</scp> frica","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ulkoministeriö","keywords":"Climate model; Climatology; Representative Concentration Pathways; General Circulation Model; Environmental science; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Population; Climate change; Physical geography; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.01749144065067539,"score_gpt":0.2457911100719979,"score_spread":0.2282996694213225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998868187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97255874,0.000022409766,0.0139127085,0.00063825963,0.00030357006,0.00079530943,0.000039335042,0.00003431424,0.011695336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323124,0.00007072686,0.0058177677,0.00020776228,0.0001584885,0.00025152345,0.000012251027,0.000019363037,0.0002308898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755347,0.0003103249,0.0008050504,0.00038840127,0.00020831938,0.0007344159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949008,0.003962859,0.00057551445,0.0002707147,0.0000705081,0.00021959752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017444185,0.00020433044,0.00046863616,0.000216776,0.00033561073,0.000033012417,0.00045873722,0.00024071016,0.00012049438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020846503,0.00017606959,0.00018532615,0.00056745554,0.00030747533,0.00024085921,0.00020275901,0.0003791716,0.00009131726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007514226,0.0071133245,0.8040764,0.00013412822,0.0001691055,0.00003011012,0.005622775,0.08723496,0.0075234612,0.054032847,0.03127563,0.0027121608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021222543,0.0027898275,0.7504073,0.000016313144,0.00016770007,0.00013854698,0.0030344252,0.012530457,0.0001953713,0.044885177,0.18358204,0.00013059829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040358846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008150379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15230641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004412377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005733115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71799093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001980670","doi":"10.1111/aje.12039","title":"Tea breaks: how flower visitors can benefit from unplanned floral buffer strips in a <scp>T</scp>anzanian tea plantation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Christian ministry; Geography; Tourism; Library science; Humanities; Art; Archaeology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.00910871558755447,"score_gpt":0.1844405018932669,"score_spread":0.17533178630571244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001980670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957886,0.00004915612,0.000032872627,0.0016859568,0.0006610494,0.00012872483,0.000034435197,0.000009235568,0.0016100081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998479,0.000022211907,0.00031858578,0.00037107716,0.00025153588,0.000002270858,0.000015113053,0.000008468748,0.0005317444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987154,0.00015004879,0.00028931967,0.00016933419,0.00026837652,0.0004075117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999057,0.00028250355,0.00030458788,0.00012922635,0.00002132994,0.00020535965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004282557,0.00014974181,0.00025102217,0.00018266446,0.00015036741,0.000035839053,0.00030998074,0.000103779275,0.00041115354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121264624,0.00013084024,0.00007598382,0.000248492,0.000109781555,0.0002520033,0.00015037454,0.0002422495,0.00006147636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003310293,0.00014568369,0.987881,0.0000023303926,0.000047138426,0.0000448049,0.005601921,0.00033451317,0.0003888491,0.000006230518,0.004817112,0.00069732836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007926116,0.00017898419,0.9653373,0.0000085870215,0.00005684568,0.000024368275,0.011114347,0.00006984765,0.00009253562,0.00008153063,0.022167722,0.00007531688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090907083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069794515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022543682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032664248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020569565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53355104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014234580","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2004.00527.x","title":"Management of the Nile perch, <i>Lates niloticus</i> fishery in Lake Victoria in light of the changes in its life history characteristics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Lates; Perch; Predation; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.01086622182938084,"score_gpt":0.17139700391421914,"score_spread":0.16053078208483829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014234580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954688,0.000047295995,6.6270906e-7,0.0020637973,0.00049974123,0.00014181023,0.0000074591862,7.3442015e-7,0.0017697053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960345,0.000064383916,0.000042231026,0.00014519681,0.000020406584,0.0000016076269,1.7537255e-7,0.0000029152634,0.00011961931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990942,0.00012457653,0.0003849369,0.00008592267,0.00015973861,0.00015063872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933875,0.000050859984,0.00044417687,0.00012066435,0.000012216338,0.000033349494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048676736,0.00007101837,0.00024382283,0.000057124376,0.000019635676,0.0000016941893,0.000380971,0.00005479216,0.00034769814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005743366,0.000044057662,0.00004963272,0.00021529713,0.00010954482,0.000055125667,0.00019428585,0.00014861785,0.000005055809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032216954,0.00022515806,0.9947417,0.00003249057,0.000013896963,0.000041797997,0.0027823283,0.00017775065,0.0010497733,0.00007462704,0.0007320929,0.00009619874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049124827,0.00012566648,0.9909891,0.00007845059,0.000013544694,0.0000066100183,0.0007459217,0.000010603637,0.00024878257,0.00008036138,0.0071611805,0.000048545222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118175936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026337937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026219761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004902186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040858657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99142885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014881107","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2004.00536.x","title":"Biology of the marbled lungfish, <i>Protopterus aethiopicus</i> Heckel, in Lake Baringo, Kenya","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Lungfish; Biology; Sex ratio; Fecundity; Marbled meat; Reproduction; Zoology; Aestivation; Maturity (psychological); Population; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Ecology; Animal science; Demography","score_opus":0.007723106087863653,"score_gpt":0.19850892493464706,"score_spread":0.19078581884678342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014881107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99246526,0.00001725671,0.000042526677,0.0012730012,0.00028363886,0.0001784588,0.000007147131,0.0000022450095,0.0057304837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.000009214565,0.00047326228,0.00023382425,0.00003027704,0.00000221843,2.6356048e-7,0.0000030386907,0.00006600201],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989991,0.00013427189,0.00042262216,0.00011712735,0.00011346313,0.00021338782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992651,0.00006884592,0.00043907584,0.00015011294,0.000017429127,0.000059451795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005441077,0.000084397194,0.000275201,0.000048080547,0.00005626067,0.000003856039,0.0004436193,0.00009759906,0.00083018205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009156493,0.00005406394,0.00009726358,0.00020349862,0.00026194056,0.00006916978,0.00021918875,0.00021704988,0.000033158398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003059885,0.00010447782,0.995687,0.000005174805,0.000016561471,0.000023491071,0.0004195826,0.00029641928,0.002460264,0.00029548127,0.0003076127,0.00035331713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001521499,0.000654246,0.9806872,0.000026867241,0.000024784487,0.000106166444,0.0003514742,0.000014571624,0.0018143525,0.003514367,0.011171113,0.00011336438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002647988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011722132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014999825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001565494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048911625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9089911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023648518","doi":"10.1111/aje.12186","title":"Wet and dry season diets of the Endangered<i>Lemur catta</i>(ring-tailed lemur) in two mountainous rocky outcrop forest fragments in south-central Madagascar","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Primate Conservation","keywords":"Lemur catta; Lemur; Dry season; Ecology; Biology; Endangered species; Wet season; Geography; Forestry; Habitat","score_opus":0.014787026734115768,"score_gpt":0.28253264355254615,"score_spread":0.2677456168184304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023648518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99599326,0.0002013242,0.000029291152,0.00065128005,0.0013196014,0.00027260213,0.00001831474,0.000007721979,0.0015066112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992805,0.000018250512,0.000110219655,0.00031748906,0.000121150515,0.000020264733,0.0000025480401,0.000030997766,0.000098544515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970172,0.0006840165,0.0009496115,0.00031072999,0.00018194086,0.0008564761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820745,0.00031529053,0.0007741728,0.00043098073,0.00009001274,0.00018211603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088798895,0.00025103596,0.0007965341,0.00034831848,0.00008153562,0.000014496244,0.0006979366,0.00020630147,0.0002653567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022763094,0.00020120574,0.0001493378,0.00025541917,0.0002719639,0.00009851151,0.00026161937,0.0006635035,0.00001488953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033140805,0.00040341905,0.98961943,0.00001528821,0.00006221415,0.00014142573,0.0071387812,0.00024422223,0.00045541622,0.00040972742,0.00015416679,0.0010245062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004299758,0.0006779622,0.990909,0.00002798838,0.000074341646,0.00017492642,0.0023182074,0.00008513808,0.00007010609,0.0008252747,0.0003665691,0.0001707267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000402099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010588419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01018632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027088198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013087963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82049316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031070453","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00889.x","title":"Morphological criteria to identify faecal pellets of sympatric ungulates in West African savanna and estimates of associated error","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie","keywords":"Sympatric speciation; Ungulate; Pellets; Biology; Ecology; Pellet; Habitat","score_opus":0.023995210479019945,"score_gpt":0.27757866493780087,"score_spread":0.25358345445878094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031070453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998072,0.000047390615,0.000024266325,0.001273899,0.000121225785,0.00010262626,0.000005898489,0.000004077443,0.00034857882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987768,0.000020672094,0.0009832701,0.00016650504,0.0000136081135,0.0000030058682,0.000001394626,0.000006324581,0.000028441726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862343,0.00018162013,0.0006426197,0.00016083344,0.00014712363,0.00024439124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988182,0.00042042308,0.00051299465,0.0000894074,0.000049906866,0.00010904548],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005731391,0.00011280656,0.0004507462,0.0001897784,0.000056354354,0.0000033017254,0.0002231172,0.00014089495,0.0010131781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076421787,0.00009890655,0.000058708265,0.00042372016,0.00047656056,0.00012031673,0.00012350432,0.00017398395,0.000016682074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110125635,0.0002543808,0.9894597,0.0000036943882,0.00002737283,0.00018089706,0.00092294154,0.00034664237,0.007654893,0.000012678901,0.00091232505,0.00011434895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000525784,0.0010744616,0.99645746,0.000010735368,0.000032193828,0.00028530124,0.0003035533,0.0001939173,0.00035344678,0.0006534838,0.000023672355,0.00008598311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108570006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003074242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073014465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010076732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040012244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033274370","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2009.01037.x","title":"The structure and status of forest fragments outside protected areas in central Uganda","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"International Primate Protection League","keywords":"Deforestation (computer science); Basal area; Forest structure; Agroforestry; Geography; Forestry; Habitat; Tree canopy; High forest; Canopy; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.006074672937756712,"score_gpt":0.18862717323761577,"score_spread":0.18255250029985906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033274370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981562,0.00004115049,0.000011817119,0.0012011225,0.000056852386,0.00012239184,0.0000029865118,0.0000013081325,0.00040618936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996169,0.00005817211,0.00015709776,0.00010816876,0.000011574189,2.1550952e-7,4.504779e-7,0.0000012879378,0.000046122965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934536,0.00006046212,0.00019305889,0.000067008245,0.000119685,0.00021441556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996095,0.00004411324,0.00020324496,0.000060929746,0.000012804273,0.000069460104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012326892,0.00005311741,0.00010770373,0.00004142264,0.00008061916,0.0000095193545,0.00013194185,0.000029506353,0.00009739054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006160421,0.000034611425,0.000022644068,0.00011329743,0.00014337836,0.00004411044,0.000058026464,0.00009943257,7.353751e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006408112,0.00003174052,0.99411654,0.0000014507204,0.000011524686,0.0000137532825,0.0006883222,0.00048435776,0.00028633498,0.000010383361,0.00012705442,0.004164459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047999804,0.00028797486,0.9944977,0.000004051992,0.00001144038,0.0000091387565,0.00068299985,0.000049151502,0.000057210953,0.001014862,0.0028701897,0.00003526464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000120389785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015711029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041291947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009660188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016671325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1411413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053570997","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00725.x","title":"Abundance and distribution of fish in the lower Mnembo River, Malawi‐Mozambique","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Fish Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Barbus; Labeo; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Biomass (ecology); Population dynamics of fisheries; Population; Ecology; Drainage basin; Geography; Fish migration; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Cyprinidae","score_opus":0.008956259043002197,"score_gpt":0.19427502563866347,"score_spread":0.18531876659566127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053570997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880269,0.00015061624,0.0000010339136,0.011120539,0.0001388106,0.00005642424,0.000019568624,0.0000019949628,0.00048409906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992877,0.00012492365,0.000013045705,0.00044253631,0.00009126994,0.000002805845,0.000006124218,2.5979304e-7,0.0000313351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992464,0.00016976282,0.00028100528,0.000086907174,0.00004693705,0.00016898401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914014,0.00050641963,0.00024196197,0.000023306857,0.000071233335,0.000016927472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048273426,0.00006684269,0.00021554616,0.000011246172,0.00009191155,0.0000044005255,0.00017199694,0.000100168945,0.00004435343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009234278,0.000023144463,0.00005026388,0.00014526522,0.0004221527,0.00005102298,0.000033938897,0.00015609393,0.0000011355195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016270416,0.00037898726,0.97721785,0.000005102348,0.00003158209,0.00006789739,0.00016761196,0.000010645745,0.0031853418,0.002094218,0.014845501,0.0018325367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017146248,0.0010784735,0.98776704,0.00000519267,0.000011177886,0.00009162046,0.00041711584,0.0000018998443,0.00008864715,0.0035545877,0.0067685116,0.000044299595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091473725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004564186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011260786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016649099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000077220875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25469232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070873427","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00684.x","title":"Anthropogenic influences on population sizes, age and growth of naturalized rainbow trout, <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>, in Kenya","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Rainbow trout; Fishery; Trout; Population; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; STREAMS; Population dynamics of fisheries; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.006053619926705164,"score_gpt":0.22260574662570481,"score_spread":0.21655212669899965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070873427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949912,0.000058716567,0.000003859189,0.0011584944,0.000103907405,0.00010562542,0.0000015939773,0.000004268199,0.0035723273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908245,0.00010404496,0.00035675932,0.00031637773,0.000028199569,0.0000028401064,0.0000014011001,0.000004699412,0.0001032314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989586,0.00013955952,0.0004363647,0.00013912463,0.00012611558,0.00020023836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926126,0.00021953923,0.00040969934,0.00006514674,0.000013183539,0.00003118034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035931,0.00010432541,0.00033194016,0.00013551964,0.00007810362,0.00000532184,0.00014292102,0.00007107399,0.00022256174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013177184,0.00008562784,0.000048871283,0.00021168073,0.0004086399,0.00014839317,0.00008107015,0.00015144107,0.0000046915275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011928774,0.00011233874,0.99571985,0.0000061210676,0.000025360765,0.000101026,0.0001484669,0.000320858,0.0006426389,0.00056182616,0.0020534368,0.0001887599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009199131,0.0005851056,0.99145395,0.000008421484,0.000027274835,0.000019557321,0.00015204329,0.000012805877,0.000117430085,0.0063832635,0.00024180699,0.00007845661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042713582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065940022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061668665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009124274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006672404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3679608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096654729","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2012.01346.x","title":"How do differences in species and part consumption affect diet nutrient concentrations? A test with red colobus monkeys in <scp>K</scp>ibale <scp>N</scp>ational <scp>P</scp>ark, <scp>U</scp>ganda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nutrient; Biology; Primate; Abundance (ecology); Plant species; Zoology; Ecology; Botany","score_opus":0.0396639044481022,"score_gpt":0.2722317972844502,"score_spread":0.232567892836348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096654729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872408,0.0021026826,0.000105985724,0.0005311304,0.001955754,0.00104445,0.00017870961,0.00005579432,0.0067847245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950251,0.0010018077,0.00034165065,0.00026263625,0.00055567967,0.00027237594,0.000068835696,0.00006913631,0.002402794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390554,0.0012232227,0.0014837212,0.00082251657,0.0005818439,0.0019831457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98159784,0.015100905,0.0017003099,0.00048335537,0.00041588818,0.00070170214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015238782,0.00073579315,0.0016346412,0.0009748215,0.00035110558,0.00022199965,0.00065918145,0.0007324759,0.00018135704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005883538,0.0006551577,0.00021757493,0.00083555566,0.0011933487,0.00078077544,0.00019050445,0.0012883559,0.00009056752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008036859,0.0020047561,0.95240545,0.000046964935,0.00022525097,0.00040532462,0.009897772,0.00002222745,0.0012567176,0.002163369,0.031407736,0.000084051375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005512648,0.0043485663,0.93745005,0.00008861651,0.00024989175,0.0011296711,0.028367301,0.000030848165,0.0005093604,0.00058409845,0.021625191,0.00010376203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003737796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012008541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01846953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056179735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042648663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100434236","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2012.01347.x","title":"Male‐killer dynamics in<i><scp>D</scp>anaus chrysippus</i>(<scp>L</scp>.) (<scp>L</scp>epidoptera:<scp>N</scp>ymphalidae) in<scp>E</scp>ast<scp>A</scp>frica","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Genetics","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Biology; Bacteria; Spiroplasma; Genetics; Demography","score_opus":0.015024063436063669,"score_gpt":0.22214832862780384,"score_spread":0.20712426519174018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100434236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.943524,0.0037347365,0.000020765689,0.0009609051,0.006950622,0.0015731354,0.0004711071,0.0002693592,0.042495374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770899,0.0023654958,0.00063694647,0.0030377356,0.0053375247,0.00023080695,0.00029653774,0.00012018067,0.01088487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.979968,0.0027657193,0.005493375,0.0026228502,0.0022780166,0.006872036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96509576,0.024588125,0.005043706,0.0010475587,0.0015480488,0.0026767924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005450622,0.0028303154,0.0046466202,0.0012888379,0.0015787965,0.0011676095,0.00465122,0.0026535185,0.00033514106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017826945,0.0017366916,0.0019779077,0.0045749354,0.0017633756,0.002840479,0.0014701112,0.0035207309,0.0010316928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080633756,0.007192341,0.65762866,0.00038403727,0.0019429423,0.0021289308,0.020733558,0.00059775455,0.105436005,0.003972825,0.19437557,0.0055267606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003925801,0.0055966545,0.4465083,0.00050461007,0.00064925075,0.0024815297,0.056966465,0.00031969923,0.006065745,0.0022747891,0.4742339,0.0004732739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010532973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043944274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27985832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015795263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062912883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100968440","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01315.x","title":"Arbuscular mycorrhizal soil infectivity and spores distribution across plantations of tropical, subtropical and exotic tree species: a case study from the forest reserve of <scp>B</scp>andia, <scp>S</scp>enegal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Herbaceous plant; Colonization; Mycorrhiza; Vegetation (pathology); Species richness; Subtropics; Spore; Soil water; Botany; Glomus; Symbiosis; Agronomy; Ecology","score_opus":0.023444154861919662,"score_gpt":0.23807371737488475,"score_spread":0.21462956251296508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100968440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99736017,0.00041484655,0.000037115096,0.000098293014,0.00023905974,0.00020582836,0.0015279676,0.000005727606,0.00011098577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916446,0.00031865024,0.000028305134,0.000017306147,0.0003325699,0.000006664457,0.000101422935,0.0000017165944,0.000028904231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983845,0.00040847948,0.00051925203,0.00016214693,0.00019108213,0.00033455822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98390603,0.015171362,0.000493237,0.00007788469,0.00016309452,0.00018839969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038348863,0.00015609534,0.00044168974,0.000025722155,0.00026731435,0.000042975604,0.0001748689,0.000114088136,0.00007628423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026675975,0.00006551252,0.00013138271,0.00023351466,0.00012382594,0.00022947966,0.00010283877,0.00029169218,0.0000037086456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047565172,0.00050185586,0.9944516,0.000006799538,0.0001094044,0.00019307244,0.0017142863,0.000016145506,0.0015162248,0.00031336764,0.0010031206,0.00012654733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027436268,0.0015644077,0.9712602,0.000021326254,0.00014284533,0.0022070524,0.02236079,0.000049206883,0.00016473653,0.00032098635,0.0015998813,0.000034208246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002700301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020419998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023191415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028819635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025444004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99745476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105276460","doi":"10.1111/aje.12048","title":"Diet and feeding habits of the small catfish,<i><scp>C</scp>larias liocephalus</i>in wetlands of<scp>W</scp>estern<scp>U</scp>ganda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Mbarara University of Science and Technology","keywords":"Catfish; Wetland; Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Predation; Fishing; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat","score_opus":0.01567328160955405,"score_gpt":0.19929040801689882,"score_spread":0.18361712640734476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105276460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99057454,0.00032485725,0.000042668562,0.0001805914,0.0007340683,0.0002306652,0.000028380837,0.0000064084265,0.007877807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849564,0.00011158694,0.00037167285,0.00014010102,0.000175053,0.000002879443,0.0000015031329,0.000015983447,0.0006856102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975082,0.00030192515,0.00083322736,0.0002650342,0.00040558894,0.0006860143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963288,0.0017423411,0.001282353,0.00026542833,0.00006304324,0.000318058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017867963,0.0002630952,0.0007161613,0.00015887515,0.0001791132,0.000025462241,0.00068412744,0.00023399344,0.000055256773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001445368,0.00018835433,0.00019844623,0.0004319819,0.00045352252,0.000347132,0.0005667858,0.00044037544,0.000029392717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000821703,0.00022177731,0.9832432,0.000035251534,0.00007686744,0.000021231448,0.0066132722,0.000050458973,0.0030733598,0.000053629225,0.006483458,0.00011923073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011500102,0.00090457016,0.9767716,0.00006604461,0.00013257634,0.00021340941,0.008171607,0.00007724641,0.002401198,0.0002011457,0.009864474,0.000046117428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029742473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015349564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007921057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001833972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006227558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7680867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113059993","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00636.x","title":"What hope for African primate diversity?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Research Foundation; Wildlife Conservation Society; World Bank Group","keywords":"Bushmeat; Threatened species; Deforestation (computer science); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Primate; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Climate change; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Biology; Wildlife; Habitat; Economics","score_opus":0.02948965073214779,"score_gpt":0.30694598806500056,"score_spread":0.2774563373328528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113059993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97311467,0.00042097757,0.0004553593,0.0029189284,0.00617166,0.0003020201,0.00002150066,0.0000315553,0.01656333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638766,0.000040310293,0.00076978863,0.00042687517,0.00042994923,0.000020837182,0.0000065653167,0.00002627502,0.001891725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981694,0.00017028837,0.00062492624,0.00024367597,0.0001291722,0.0006625151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982843,0.00040190254,0.0006678141,0.00024266777,0.000258641,0.00014469936],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006622244,0.00018526414,0.0005664748,0.00034460315,0.0002524805,0.000041272422,0.00055984635,0.00020909113,0.0016427565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005547876,0.00017172346,0.00025764384,0.00019193214,0.00020915872,0.0003340237,0.00020496137,0.00025233548,0.00011811224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041509587,0.0041177985,0.5993744,0.00006549963,0.00097182393,0.002277116,0.010285395,0.00014466637,0.0044644927,0.06235939,0.28667286,0.025115607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00588804,0.0047404356,0.86443603,0.000017359687,0.0005594709,0.0016234274,0.010173691,0.000009917412,0.00041054795,0.018063394,0.09351693,0.00056075904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006390608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022778794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26506162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018166951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009213251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114734717","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2028.2000.00252.x","title":"Ecology of a diplozoon parasite on the gills of the African cyprinid <i>Barbus neumayeri</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Parasite Biology and Host Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Parasite hosting; Biology; Gill; Barbus; Host (biology); Zoology; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Aquatic animal; Parasite load; Cyprinidae; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery","score_opus":0.01060152828247671,"score_gpt":0.26362263472675523,"score_spread":0.2530211064442785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114734717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95038694,0.000017880195,0.0000031173533,0.003295734,0.00032956738,0.00012601615,0.000012681473,0.0000032483572,0.045824826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804527,0.00006468134,0.00006435941,0.00086583686,0.000045549386,0.0000065252375,3.2908264e-7,0.0000076933675,0.000899782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840814,0.0004687798,0.0005501451,0.00014829967,0.00015229695,0.00027235228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802125,0.00088547514,0.0006799383,0.00031210616,0.000029725403,0.00007150705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047182414,0.00013008463,0.00034825303,0.000055562996,0.00015514082,0.000003837911,0.0006885284,0.00011059333,0.007277893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016892944,0.000072408955,0.00020662107,0.00027336026,0.00092115335,0.00007214837,0.000084809755,0.00038733188,0.00015098075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007772386,0.00087194314,0.952378,0.000004068459,0.00024535408,0.00003197722,0.0017898461,0.0036473782,0.02835844,0.0012846629,0.004157739,0.006453352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030090078,0.0013002175,0.9714167,0.0000100698135,0.00005409581,0.00018289214,0.00026745925,0.000017804241,0.0035629838,0.00074598094,0.022062281,0.00007862124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049388662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031471442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047658317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091438385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004716636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118627327","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00905.x","title":"Golden monkey ranging in relation to spatial and temporal variation in food availability","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bamboo; Biology; Foraging; National park; Shrub; Habitat; Ecology; Basal area; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.03267436615298722,"score_gpt":0.2851892081490708,"score_spread":0.25251484199608354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118627327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970368,0.000054902324,0.0002487783,0.0007214427,0.00057964114,0.00017562686,0.000002528534,0.0000059936156,0.0011742461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925804,0.000007062571,0.00049098156,0.00010669671,0.00006925478,0.000011913278,0.0000011802938,0.000009044045,0.000045818393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985235,0.0003329974,0.00061379536,0.00017928921,0.00007289202,0.00027754778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929523,0.00020681339,0.00023945358,0.000115071154,0.000057393398,0.00008600876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008014741,0.000092458555,0.0003316595,0.00050061033,0.000040300056,0.0000042464594,0.00011380428,0.00016235815,0.0004066383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020434715,0.00009449769,0.000037008063,0.00024563787,0.00005887524,0.00011691149,0.00003852028,0.0002858897,0.000027902624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002944462,0.00019091443,0.9905258,0.0000020492487,0.000010312388,0.00016981227,0.006910614,0.000045319593,0.0004658931,0.00019829953,0.00013936183,0.0010472246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016180759,0.001053613,0.995725,0.000004347135,0.000009279287,0.00034557906,0.0003554022,0.00003115245,0.00001221979,0.00059336144,0.00017035911,0.00008161369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036992916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027717138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065552117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021226221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008042619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44524044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134526563","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2009.01174.x","title":"Range expansion of the globally Vulnerable Karamoja apalis <i>Apalis karamojae</i> in the Serengeti ecosystem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildebeest; Ecology; Ungulate; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Warbler; Overgrazing; Threatened species; Woodland; Trampling; Belt transect; Grazing; Habitat; Biology; National park","score_opus":0.007507180473533402,"score_gpt":0.21547092215013142,"score_spread":0.207963741676598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134526563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791432,0.00014274623,0.000041469262,0.0065720514,0.0003237692,0.00018594664,0.0000065868903,0.0000036863541,0.013580534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809,0.00007617953,0.00019215133,0.0014957065,0.00003912555,0.000004971184,4.6421601e-7,0.000004225253,0.00009716224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980253,0.00072503433,0.0005588562,0.000136952,0.0002601127,0.0002937526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870425,0.00043430043,0.0005560836,0.00022007896,0.00004391044,0.000041355128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001774995,0.0001239065,0.00032693078,0.000051553547,0.00022450008,0.000010894348,0.00072941824,0.00010137253,0.00017893591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022969395,0.0000704037,0.00012771056,0.00038803986,0.0002050491,0.00013361507,0.00009134687,0.00037140367,0.000017087787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023549586,0.00062672864,0.93838346,0.00002154424,0.00010293068,0.00008745293,0.011065966,0.029148616,0.0016838004,0.0053651826,0.010844742,0.00243411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087165326,0.00081209734,0.98668164,0.000024254294,0.000052467964,0.00019013321,0.002273589,0.00035883675,0.00012627213,0.006759479,0.0017345009,0.000115058756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004117248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004873302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04829823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013541899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038711063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28709796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144320387","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2006.00582.x","title":"Food web structure and mercury transfer in two contrasting Ugandan highland crater lakes (East Africa)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Queen's University","funders":"Directorate for Biological Sciences; University of Waterloo; University of Hull","keywords":"Trophic level; Food web; Crater lake; Ecology; δ15N; Lates; Biomagnification; Mercury (programming language); Biology; Fishery; Impact crater; δ13C; Stable isotope ratio; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.010592857466926928,"score_gpt":0.22289295735147005,"score_spread":0.21230009988454313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144320387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956282,0.0001835946,0.000040391198,0.0008960186,0.00012569908,0.0000668202,0.000027947932,0.0000042955994,0.0030270298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996022,0.000014749872,0.00014440028,0.0000778998,0.000087819244,0.0000014581731,7.7748524e-7,0.000007274418,0.000063433996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990516,0.00009345949,0.00034831234,0.000116923824,0.00012920774,0.00026054535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996328,0.00011281337,0.00010564793,0.000048802456,0.00001813524,0.000081821556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022517184,0.00011614435,0.0002767829,0.00008051004,0.00008111392,0.000019107465,0.00008911324,0.000039724746,0.00055780396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036092977,0.00008716747,0.000036848734,0.00014403528,0.00021877109,0.00015994514,0.000025703219,0.00016715292,0.000003984443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084727326,0.000058483165,0.94201654,0.0000055828064,0.000038554375,0.000059829064,0.002377695,0.00024421458,0.052873816,0.00022119425,0.0011891599,0.0008302049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025555405,0.0007592348,0.9846643,0.000017264592,0.000058358542,0.000324234,0.0014010841,0.000069728754,0.0016229581,0.002584825,0.0057320464,0.000210393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001429012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004624473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05125086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050746166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019548452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6107562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145054444","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2009.01163.x","title":"Intra‐lake stable isotope ratio variation in selected fish species and their possible carbon sources in Lake Kyoga (Uganda): implications for aquatic food web studies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Agricultural Research Organisation; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Trophic level; Food web; Isotopes of carbon; Stable isotope ratio; Environmental science; Phytoplankton; Ecology; Carbon fibers; Trophic state index; δ15N; Food chain; Environmental chemistry; δ13C; Biology; Total organic carbon; Chemistry; Nutrient","score_opus":0.014512733974991624,"score_gpt":0.2333236958905958,"score_spread":0.21881096191560417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145054444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929596,0.00008282766,0.0001512946,0.0057202736,0.000070023314,0.0003117066,0.000020290201,0.0000063573457,0.0006776323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853456,0.00014875545,0.0007696018,0.00034689932,0.00004710133,0.00003299491,0.000003829336,0.000007524428,0.000108746295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985816,0.00019661806,0.00060246396,0.00020991935,0.00007771098,0.00033167005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879533,0.0005535695,0.0004089727,0.00012761266,0.00006155441,0.000052985517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000729683,0.00013810601,0.00046167962,0.00027557387,0.00010504046,0.000024780651,0.00021532422,0.00008780594,0.000141496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060356327,0.00011618456,0.000044584547,0.0007057737,0.00016030815,0.00019737708,0.000052604097,0.00018550664,0.0000012415936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009768813,0.0003286607,0.9753221,0.000007078622,0.00013199898,0.00000579321,0.006172803,0.003256973,0.012584775,0.00044594126,0.00069316244,0.00095301174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009808674,0.0013421645,0.98452806,0.0000077065,0.000042219985,0.000029684323,0.0014470837,0.0015062521,0.00032558554,0.008485698,0.0011832955,0.00012135561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009475741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13978909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13977961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022665501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008034671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87590754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150887963","doi":"10.1111/aje.12230","title":"Can we rely on forest reserves for primate conservation?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Primate; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.11245575640768089,"score_gpt":0.37266807367763133,"score_spread":0.2602123172699504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150887963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603716,0.00011191816,0.00008011132,0.027221784,0.0025532285,0.00027481123,0.000030394116,0.000021779324,0.009334335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996224,0.000015074946,0.00090349105,0.0011113806,0.0002593428,0.000051744002,0.000007683782,0.000029547453,0.0013977553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982953,0.00024154765,0.00064857304,0.0001989015,0.00012872611,0.00048695243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977719,0.0006363897,0.0006249243,0.00026815888,0.00043909627,0.0002595042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010315359,0.00015422731,0.0004694859,0.00028884498,0.0000859653,0.000016253003,0.0004071646,0.00019689774,0.00031370186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000522358,0.00013365236,0.00013397036,0.0001516895,0.00016005266,0.000082060134,0.000046243735,0.00027006678,0.00008221997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033089777,0.0008972549,0.61555874,0.000021004718,0.00026981023,0.00040927765,0.0041430537,0.00010568651,0.00028457327,0.059023563,0.3141151,0.0018629647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007695456,0.013620999,0.8113161,0.000025676458,0.00021233795,0.001080347,0.005336072,0.00003181673,0.00020654552,0.0531799,0.10691698,0.00037780992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055126297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010092466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20719811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020222481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000336381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5450185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155347006","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2009.01197.x","title":"Censusing large mammals in Kibale National Park: evaluation of the intensity of sampling required to determine change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"National park; Wildlife; Geography; Population; Habitat; Distance sampling; Ecology; Wildlife management; Population density; Transect; Sampling (signal processing); Population size; Mammal; Aerial survey; Population growth; Wildlife conservation; Biology; Cartography; Demography","score_opus":0.1075631048870331,"score_gpt":0.3144199831469051,"score_spread":0.206856878259872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155347006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958709,0.000010722903,0.00005695795,0.0033699272,0.0001623302,0.00015107202,0.0000027980245,9.969137e-7,0.00037430774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982718,0.0000020515163,0.00067770906,0.0009980927,0.00003910537,0.0000013821725,6.0699205e-7,0.0000019970525,0.0000072234247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892324,0.00019850383,0.00039709968,0.00007968249,0.00026620296,0.00013529122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912816,0.000117371834,0.00045701768,0.000073156356,0.00019435422,0.00002995346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022603045,0.00005038152,0.00017653957,0.00008362058,0.000042868396,0.0000017208683,0.00015431685,0.000054097618,0.00018923321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010388712,0.000040582116,0.00003984429,0.0003113402,0.00006850232,0.00012108356,0.00005323104,0.00009025763,0.0000028731788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009711966,0.00012966519,0.986364,0.0000015609479,0.000008000321,0.0000019377817,0.0010972136,0.0015263581,0.00678878,0.00008773334,0.00018780916,0.0037098161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041496597,0.0002210318,0.9954114,0.000016747023,0.000019552923,0.000024385403,0.00017485752,0.000978477,0.0004862098,0.002164198,0.00005267264,0.00003548913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016536334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006162334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009047407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022478706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063657375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2071971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157775870","doi":"10.1111/aje.12207","title":"Decline of sable antelope in one of its key conservation areas: the greater<scp>H</scp>wange ecosystem,<scp>Z</scp>imbabwe","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"National park; Wildlife; Habitat; Geography; Ecosystem; Competition (biology); Ecology; Forage; African elephant; Wildlife conservation; Predation; Biology","score_opus":0.035795919106034454,"score_gpt":0.2298666198864744,"score_spread":0.19407070078043992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157775870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924113,0.00015791756,0.000064974265,0.0022304002,0.00027342897,0.00026408437,0.000012883923,0.000006256181,0.004578763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982228,0.000081645216,0.00045689548,0.0007061306,0.0000714754,0.000012300103,0.0000034689044,0.000012827877,0.00043245748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758464,0.0005328623,0.0010356335,0.00019294073,0.0003124485,0.0003414602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658406,0.0015129212,0.0013609295,0.00020205823,0.00020464812,0.00013539687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023225232,0.0001593102,0.0005438354,0.0001682765,0.000067815294,0.000010053525,0.0005225377,0.00018558753,0.00017850654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002925684,0.00012541257,0.0000882851,0.00054016965,0.00025077217,0.00032470335,0.00017494359,0.00027861944,0.00007726123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043520526,0.000250163,0.9854652,0.000021306107,0.00006425577,0.000030055637,0.0022218816,0.00094877963,0.0012170849,0.0001753104,0.009439575,0.00012284888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012510337,0.0009820762,0.98536766,0.000055443517,0.000057225807,0.00011845329,0.0028368668,0.00073283806,0.0016105775,0.0012450735,0.005702996,0.000039756964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011646678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003654798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005811508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021384351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019931137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5114176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169993524","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.00943.x","title":"Report from the UNFCCC meeting in Bali","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Deforestation (computer science); Conference of the parties; Indonesian; Clean Development Mechanism; Negotiation; Greenhouse gas; Convention; Agriculture; Climate change; Download; Political science; Environmental protection; Forestry; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.016980516294060673,"score_gpt":0.1928586014042433,"score_spread":0.17587808511018263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169993524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821699,0.00003469673,0.000017400747,0.0048077186,0.00015047194,0.000043237585,7.0309665e-7,0.0000024206138,0.012773422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866086,0.000037206362,0.0003195085,0.00054009166,0.000054818585,4.6590606e-7,5.6112924e-7,0.0000019701279,0.00038454335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993002,0.00009622295,0.0002519583,0.00008624793,0.00014419446,0.00012118431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944174,0.00015773032,0.00024995295,0.00010281487,0.000010361949,0.000037403188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046494216,0.00004706844,0.000105349114,0.00002971902,0.00013383885,0.000004976645,0.0002388549,0.00002594074,0.00087286846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001320001,0.000031796186,0.000044213783,0.00014737509,0.00017999539,0.000046820907,0.0001459226,0.000106889376,0.00004112712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102518225,0.000031081803,0.99206734,2.28226e-7,0.000011377809,0.00066669565,0.0011371906,0.00035728654,0.000062406965,0.0000014343808,0.0053165667,0.00033814367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019598528,0.000043457447,0.9532738,0.0000026848913,0.00001043209,0.0001668204,0.0012419344,0.000027404298,0.000012221379,0.00015084547,0.044837903,0.000036546113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008790871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014315166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039521337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010225342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016275728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9557298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249085337","doi":"10.1111/aje.12255","title":"Do animal size, seasons and vegetation type influence detection probability and density estimates of Serengeti ungulates?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology","keywords":"Ungulate; Wildebeest; Transect; Vegetation (pathology); Geography; Population density; Physical geography; Sample size determination; Ecology; Population; National park; Biology; Statistics; Habitat; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01454764538541809,"score_gpt":0.22945918779704758,"score_spread":0.2149115424116295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249085337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926865,0.000052934458,0.000033905864,0.00038258987,0.00006827402,0.000073262614,3.392672e-7,0.0000040066257,0.00011606212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980879,0.000008756952,0.0018292925,0.00005499257,0.000011151823,0.0000011008578,1.458456e-7,0.0000026377097,0.0000040306627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994471,0.00010750567,0.00016745152,0.00010440487,0.00007712365,0.00009642083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999246,0.00025428904,0.000263278,0.000057003133,0.00009358191,0.00008584783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005349149,0.000059809943,0.00014839385,0.000024795601,0.000050444687,0.000006719758,0.00005482215,0.000070690745,0.000025139998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010803856,0.000053303724,0.0000130359285,0.000121169265,0.00029500943,0.00021981074,0.000051143867,0.000100579986,0.0000034951574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015727596,0.000031939966,0.9946724,0.0000069298017,0.000012211633,0.000003877249,0.00028512097,0.0005207594,0.0034820626,0.000068817564,0.000021924954,0.000736653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002875123,0.00095087965,0.98888046,0.000005050019,0.000033433636,0.000114389586,0.00010293941,0.0004899022,0.0007116507,0.008362198,0.000014999396,0.000046560246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001965451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031460743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008293381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006423991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040505798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21736628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252937168","doi":"10.1111/aje.12265","title":"Land use, rangeland degradation and ecological changes in the southern Kalahari, Botswana","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Rangeland; Geography; Arid; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Wildlife; Perennial plant; Overgrazing; Native plant; Grazing; Introduced species; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.016620379837578896,"score_gpt":0.20727847332165092,"score_spread":0.19065809348407203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252937168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98959595,0.000027673053,0.000067934416,0.008662753,0.0001009527,0.00012777999,0.0000025881523,0.0000032458906,0.0014111008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872065,0.0001054121,0.00013327507,0.00033233146,0.000054996202,0.000007990164,4.5380693e-7,0.000004184203,0.0006407168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991565,0.00023672685,0.0001887687,0.00011706471,0.000097188546,0.0002037621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991738,0.00051501737,0.00017711478,0.00007948749,0.0000076167985,0.000046920235],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006623242,0.00007967846,0.00016898577,0.000073259136,0.00006107032,0.000017045102,0.0001962642,0.00006544218,0.0009361445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001335932,0.000037588303,0.000026484731,0.00010152857,0.00018221156,0.00013635446,0.00006963611,0.000096819975,0.000040881645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053687865,0.000059616123,0.9921315,0.0000010432906,0.000012973531,0.000053323038,0.00036984682,0.000005925495,0.00025949161,0.00012531858,0.0025544488,0.0043728785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008330744,0.0005899008,0.9794711,0.0000034257,0.000021368054,0.0000785831,0.00043341753,0.0000071734476,0.000005222638,0.0011899278,0.017306397,0.00006044795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004754801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010463376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147519475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045792065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064838023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255820383","doi":"10.1111/aje.12277","title":"Comparing motion capture cameras versus human observer monitoring of mammal movement through fence gaps: a case study from Kenya","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Camera trap; Wildlife; Geography; Adaptive management; Mammal; Wildlife management; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.05173835721661655,"score_gpt":0.275458010157046,"score_spread":0.22371965294042948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255820383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99838215,0.000022699538,0.00015866812,0.00032225958,0.00070371747,0.00013496453,0.0000026938474,0.000006116185,0.00026673728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991665,0.0000062089603,0.0005910312,0.000054173397,0.000119441625,0.0000065407694,4.1431292e-7,0.0000075429334,0.00004818421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987082,0.00021207231,0.000489559,0.0001867678,0.00018655298,0.00021684823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889183,0.00026077768,0.0005692721,0.0001681609,0.000041537365,0.00006845059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486896,0.00011911381,0.00028830246,0.00003889883,0.0001422129,0.0000071763648,0.00023592544,0.00007757929,0.00059253845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000805599,0.000090587186,0.00006417632,0.00011649719,0.00017794043,0.00033795027,0.000121965095,0.00016529686,0.000018509754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013391137,0.00027999654,0.99302584,0.0000013761822,0.000086723645,0.0006064928,0.0020858932,0.00032979622,0.002989329,0.000025801817,0.0001233732,0.0003114382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001974685,0.0008710743,0.98849475,0.000015636604,0.00007602658,0.000087903885,0.007441256,0.00001264989,0.00051629834,0.0003910783,0.000023995664,0.00009467127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020481881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002806623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005355363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030214645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002346969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64878803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272190612","doi":"10.1111/aje.12266","title":"Cape ground squirrels as ecosystem engineers: modifying habitat for plants, small mammals and beetles in Namib Desert grasslands","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba; University of Central Florida; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Burrow; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Habitat; Ecosystem engineer; Foraging; Biology","score_opus":0.02025040323578646,"score_gpt":0.2371700267731033,"score_spread":0.21691962353731686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272190612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981626,0.00017824498,0.00022087502,0.00069137156,0.00021313167,0.00015528739,0.000012427886,0.00000608174,0.00035993842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988268,0.00015598343,0.0007328613,0.00007323607,0.000043583466,0.000021753829,3.7789115e-7,0.0000107491,0.00013466612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989362,0.00007580674,0.0003796211,0.00018085014,0.00007759638,0.00034995453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897283,0.0006200092,0.00022505652,0.00006685676,0.000017615057,0.00009760846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005354465,0.00013505395,0.00035954002,0.000100781064,0.0001028154,0.000009442565,0.00018280004,0.00011396898,0.00013917273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014663966,0.00009043482,0.00006201733,0.00006390095,0.00016992683,0.00015506631,0.00009444604,0.000109618144,0.000025245636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039802512,0.00013149872,0.9822637,0.00001826316,0.0000710879,0.00021717814,0.0008423689,0.00006735861,0.010435063,0.00026508243,0.00055334857,0.0047370475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001502984,0.0016670359,0.9917363,0.000045923272,0.000046476358,0.00043379443,0.0014288231,0.000037359085,0.0002514801,0.0014114397,0.0012672141,0.00017117779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002759339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039099334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010183583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001845298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022378877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3687825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610571709","doi":"10.1111/aje.12410","title":"Resource selection, utilization and seasons influence spatial distribution of ungulates in the western Serengeti National Park","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology","keywords":"Ungulate; Habitat; Ecology; Herbivore; Interspecific competition; Competition (biology); Predation; National park; Biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Vegetation (pathology); Geography","score_opus":0.01728613137072951,"score_gpt":0.25247674159113637,"score_spread":0.23519061022040685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610571709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954382,0.000012017151,0.00014499787,0.003970941,0.000040426337,0.000061020353,0.0000037578745,0.0000014447802,0.0003271806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996907,0.000011889499,0.000036726142,0.00019610634,0.00003133764,0.0000028031513,0.0000034667498,0.0000019455595,0.000025021463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932027,0.00017127067,0.00020354168,0.00007770005,0.00013339803,0.00009384747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992063,0.00018869068,0.00045692848,0.00006890498,0.000055031054,0.000024131967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069038954,0.000049501814,0.00010072963,0.00002675264,0.00019632734,0.00001643252,0.00020031781,0.000059956346,0.00004436788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006041945,0.000038705293,0.000017858372,0.000076546494,0.00028410324,0.00022166349,0.000043786542,0.00011821101,0.0000026442544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038354836,0.000038996175,0.9971856,0.0000015715251,0.000007632351,0.0000020980578,0.00025654584,0.0009859161,0.00006740604,0.00018661334,0.00066576543,0.00056351785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026258169,0.0001668567,0.99626803,0.000006027694,0.000013324877,0.000054939625,0.00008319464,0.00041863837,0.000040579118,0.0010006507,0.0016501204,0.000035062818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008501496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020200743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004252489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064631175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003966895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1578356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626050925","doi":"10.1111/aje.12427","title":"Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on tree population structure and diversity of a rain forest biosphere reserve in Ghana, West Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Abundance (ecology); Basal area; Biodiversity; Geography; Nature reserve; Biosphere; Species diversity; Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Diameter at breast height; Forestry; Population; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.00840010891495094,"score_gpt":0.22742202096485967,"score_spread":0.21902191204990873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626050925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889934,0.00009575306,0.000012503346,0.00035050875,0.00011494263,0.000093492854,0.0000060730736,9.468893e-7,0.00042645767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996155,0.000033042095,0.00029178566,0.000011441678,0.000009904981,7.658915e-7,5.22884e-7,0.0000030528388,0.000034009136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931675,0.00010453231,0.00024433483,0.000109304005,0.000097364995,0.00012770192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998858,0.0002774016,0.00069365825,0.000114452094,0.000020060175,0.000036462116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000210885,0.000075493845,0.00028095912,0.00004797876,0.000220395,0.0000034398697,0.0002302472,0.00007357797,0.00006414719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038163448,0.00006276665,0.000043074546,0.00006835226,0.00053715694,0.00012440661,0.00024888729,0.0001274593,8.512165e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012302089,0.00007789242,0.99720407,0.00002007723,0.000031330303,0.00002242848,0.00088089495,0.00063943845,0.00030851096,0.00027377877,0.00003564586,0.00038289142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000750757,0.0007211907,0.9947195,0.000020108953,0.000028558325,0.000004915739,0.00023445154,0.00023675268,0.00012529368,0.003103172,0.000004059645,0.00005123885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003258575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032106202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031780347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000747635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008036357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98555535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793249100","doi":"10.1111/aje.12496","title":"The nutritional value of feeding on crops: Diets of vervet monkeys in a humanized landscape","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; City University of New York; Wildlife Conservation Society; Hunter College; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Crop; Primate; Biology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.03154011878481145,"score_gpt":0.32852795768626586,"score_spread":0.2969878389014544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793249100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874962,0.00012124095,0.000009423851,0.00071796594,0.0011300147,0.00009630787,0.000010828825,0.0000035979256,0.010414408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994197,0.000032907185,0.00014912731,0.00009591832,0.00020140606,0.000008101416,0.0000012262542,0.0000119641,0.00007965583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983365,0.0003036949,0.0007673897,0.00013080267,0.00013895698,0.0003226786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980186,0.00080016156,0.00069389114,0.00017950733,0.00024925589,0.000058585032],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007863028,0.00010760141,0.00046013028,0.00029267272,0.00008332538,0.000005254243,0.000395307,0.00014241727,0.001252948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020970665,0.00008005283,0.00013017289,0.00020696028,0.0003891879,0.00004508034,0.00005559408,0.00027585152,0.00002820649],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005450632,0.0025965525,0.9019321,0.000029319603,0.00039978532,0.00027703788,0.006020056,0.000023075754,0.012806608,0.053830992,0.01443295,0.002200887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003055989,0.004552485,0.9845654,0.000027772601,0.000049279166,0.00017331951,0.0018367697,0.000013763993,0.0006516326,0.003965121,0.0010255744,0.000082916915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033374818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019882874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08263327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062832434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008250198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905680075","doi":"10.1111/aje.12584","title":"Liana abundance and relationships to sapling and tree hosts in an East African primary forest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Tropical Biology Association","keywords":"Liana; Basal area; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Host (biology); Biome; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Forestry; Geography; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.06010631498973128,"score_gpt":0.2256903874630282,"score_spread":0.16558407247329693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905680075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99578387,0.00020204175,0.0000016070977,0.0025029567,0.000037011512,0.000054477066,0.000005826865,0.0000043825257,0.0014078015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992427,0.000057460165,0.0002894333,0.00014139219,0.00024019543,0.0000015270506,7.70376e-7,6.2357094e-7,0.000025856842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993565,0.000071523,0.00020235773,0.00012378328,0.000062398285,0.0001834236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945515,0.0002272591,0.000119184995,0.000012316157,0.00005915303,0.00012693199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002654362,0.00007415,0.00019546204,0.0000344146,0.00018394168,0.000025892594,0.000106397914,0.00003871699,0.0000129812015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113400514,0.000032010455,0.000017909308,0.00019448246,0.00013191537,0.000121677054,0.000055164033,0.00012101172,0.0000023175917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106377614,0.00003506175,0.96850806,0.0000015591545,0.0000070934398,0.000022176062,0.0007291672,0.0000010443863,0.021178203,0.0001741358,0.000104504295,0.0091326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011830235,0.0014265317,0.9950727,0.000016043985,0.0000066103653,0.000084729814,0.0013762071,0.000011108844,0.000012971834,0.0006317748,0.0011697486,0.00007326271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029055225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04058797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04055891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022435863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007653975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915389736","doi":"10.1111/aje.12589","title":"Primates create seedling growth hotspots through pattern of dung deposition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; National Geographic Society","keywords":"Biology; Seedling; Seed dispersal; National park; Herbivore; Ecology; Shade tolerance; Ecosystem; Biological dispersal; Frugivore; Biomass (ecology); Agronomy; Habitat; Canopy","score_opus":0.01840067322015965,"score_gpt":0.2898551380900573,"score_spread":0.27145446486989766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915389736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842333,0.00015790679,0.0004431563,0.00038563184,0.0016208108,0.00015641584,0.000008811548,0.00001581962,0.012978153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874514,0.00004739748,0.0006213043,0.0002839814,0.000111973066,0.0000065903246,0.0000037195025,0.000026971313,0.00015293204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818987,0.00024115609,0.0007866772,0.00021203808,0.00012983097,0.00044040184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981989,0.0003212373,0.00091388146,0.00022799672,0.00025334425,0.00008463889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004430015,0.00016929753,0.0006359193,0.00023174864,0.000048990896,0.000009806814,0.00034046063,0.0002183543,0.00249566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042946685,0.00015234531,0.00018091887,0.00017401384,0.00011316228,0.00019006012,0.00006757815,0.00031978908,0.00019452773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030382577,0.00041829963,0.9667298,0.000045650755,0.0002195581,0.00021943574,0.003386837,0.000023475575,0.02574714,0.0011421093,0.00056209665,0.0012017637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016157309,0.0020092693,0.9871346,0.000029107248,0.0001784018,0.0012433439,0.0019334115,0.000010342701,0.0044455775,0.0011289043,0.00009231074,0.000179048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011040138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033467728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021301562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009448981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071352995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918977853","doi":"10.1111/aje.12587","title":"Using the Formozov–Malyshev–Pereleshin formula to convert mammal spoor counts into density estimates for long‐term community‐level monitoring","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mammal; Range (aeronautics); Term (time); Ecology; Statistics; Allometry; Geography; Mathematics; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.04871330538392678,"score_gpt":0.2905223349083862,"score_spread":0.24180902952445943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918977853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99599296,0.0000094149955,0.0023500384,0.0006160531,0.0005584271,0.00019717214,0.0000016559021,0.000004668155,0.00026959841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494064,0.0000020973773,0.004353289,0.0004834708,0.00006908277,0.0000046085456,9.2678e-7,0.000008449662,0.00013745917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992913,0.000084062005,0.00024156529,0.000078049925,0.000095481715,0.00020952536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911815,0.00042473426,0.00019930748,0.00014635648,0.000045183577,0.00006625632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006746671,0.000087015294,0.00018660969,0.0000401738,0.00026686618,0.000016137556,0.0003281461,0.00007638474,0.00031521826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014061262,0.00006584003,0.00006114145,0.0000915462,0.00008159128,0.0001748447,0.00012674005,0.00023044791,0.000109587476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009017669,0.00003443979,0.99592894,0.0000057175253,0.000031521886,0.00000475584,0.00057935703,0.0003039315,0.001562544,0.000058250323,0.00036862254,0.0010317183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003237401,0.00033067798,0.9963187,0.0000106631005,0.000041559753,0.00009444829,0.000344779,0.00068991166,0.0006871767,0.00084725785,0.00023234384,0.00007872808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000074422205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003178827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020032504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021448918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041649866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3451419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2930345147","doi":"10.1111/aje.12609","title":"Intergroup variation in oestrogenic plant consumption by black‐and‐white colobus monkeys","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Kyoto University; U.S. Department of Agriculture; Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre; McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"White (mutation); Variation (astronomy); Biology; Ecology; Zoology","score_opus":0.023217055723757388,"score_gpt":0.2751954093671785,"score_spread":0.25197835364342114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2930345147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985019,0.000078829944,0.000037718084,0.0005112798,0.00027102328,0.0001186879,0.000020478547,0.0000072595626,0.00045283823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995988,0.00011130662,0.00009359627,0.00008117038,0.00003495719,0.0000040983855,0.0000031918091,0.000009564006,0.00006332651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990385,0.00013391269,0.00040653325,0.00013575408,0.00008852703,0.00019673252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938625,0.000119865115,0.00030733354,0.00007257014,0.00005884575,0.000055164273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022739898,0.00010801757,0.00031286848,0.00013425417,0.00003141853,0.000010575029,0.000104677245,0.0000852426,0.00037928583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031161588,0.00009501538,0.000058119145,0.00006710598,0.000080232,0.00011165627,0.000060675327,0.00022013082,0.00006474866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000658778,0.00009868129,0.98172987,0.0000110654555,0.000059602822,0.0001385747,0.0010767765,0.000004991066,0.0151405465,0.0001930298,0.0007892453,0.00009886236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094856665,0.002904786,0.9943285,0.0000166479,0.00004775838,0.0005116038,0.00059781416,0.000047919497,0.000026398953,0.000094140974,0.0003800957,0.000095787385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018369652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040407038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015114147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010609379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002536395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4152914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011849597","doi":"10.1111/aje.12729","title":"Distribution and density of oxpeckers on giraffes in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique","keywords":"Foraging; Biology; Ecology; Host (biology); Abundance (ecology); Herbivore; National park; Zoology","score_opus":0.017702380767785852,"score_gpt":0.2175844573093475,"score_spread":0.19988207654156165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011849597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992094,0.0000058031355,0.00004127813,0.0071486593,0.000055776105,0.00004007326,0.000004857016,0.000001653403,0.00060794107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988377,0.000008849175,0.00014049624,0.00097422797,0.00002741385,0.0000010247069,0.0000022546708,0.0000017692539,0.000006256442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941754,0.000094731084,0.00021410159,0.00007975887,0.00010713023,0.00008673747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995462,0.00014948015,0.00020561216,0.000024619543,0.000021080328,0.000053065316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028309363,0.000045640925,0.00013419868,0.000025462812,0.000030442168,0.0000020558234,0.00007223954,0.000051413135,0.00019217371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026209772,0.00004191804,0.000023459812,0.0001235134,0.00016502937,0.00008427547,0.000032757744,0.00012010941,0.000012490431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011519049,0.000052067062,0.99550503,0.0000017922224,0.0000075150233,0.000011523019,0.0003104181,0.00023397412,0.00031899908,0.00027253336,0.0028523959,0.00031855478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037379883,0.0004882921,0.9972766,0.0000029077794,0.000006544046,0.000018647166,0.00017673212,0.00015854505,0.00016988897,0.0007983616,0.0004943635,0.000035311932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001063418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022634382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006743749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090829366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028188533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21041673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022299833","doi":"10.1111/aje.12740","title":"Do black‐backed jackals exhibit spatial partitioning with African wild dogs and lions?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Geography; Zoology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.01446026770395973,"score_gpt":0.20872739994179992,"score_spread":0.1942671322378402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022299833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97747004,0.000018613488,0.00054602535,0.01818565,0.00008607665,0.00010013859,0.0000026846956,0.000010560623,0.0035802391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963322,0.000019961279,0.0009738319,0.0024535044,0.00015312058,0.000007027891,0.0000012444078,0.00000986563,0.000049222697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890333,0.0001611638,0.0003422547,0.00019758697,0.0001490963,0.00024655205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990798,0.00019418176,0.00038673924,0.000086335574,0.000030648287,0.00022227874],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000310205,0.000118137476,0.0002624648,0.00004595333,0.00014710377,0.00002521405,0.00016455965,0.000080323276,0.002234592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017076662,0.00009731132,0.000041258776,0.0002442573,0.00050643965,0.00024575015,0.000084086736,0.00024991273,0.00009956942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024401139,0.000058314043,0.99087507,0.0000028413986,0.00004367662,0.000114203045,0.0020190526,0.00046156184,0.00027161324,0.00018282354,0.00486395,0.0008628849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009810971,0.0019009026,0.98938,0.000010835498,0.00006292445,0.00020734561,0.001065275,0.00029182437,0.00009224468,0.00085600576,0.005001077,0.0001504479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050438965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004992547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01886221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006234676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004995952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127352398","doi":"10.1111/aje.12844","title":"Distribution of the critically endangered Coquerel's sifaka (<i>Propithecus coquereli</i>) across a fragmented landscape in NW Madagascar","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Geography; Deforestation (computer science); Critically endangered; Ecology; Rainforest; Habitat; Endangered species; Disturbance (geology); Habitat destruction; Fragmentation (computing); Biology","score_opus":0.015878493958430842,"score_gpt":0.3005142875650742,"score_spread":0.2846357936066434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127352398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921936,0.00043368625,0.00013854941,0.0029836893,0.0015923507,0.00015193039,0.00014514974,0.0000096999665,0.0023513495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990371,0.000047129033,0.00010257101,0.00047532292,0.000089428235,0.00001618119,0.000016699596,0.000019678248,0.00019592248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972555,0.0007040034,0.0009650494,0.0002510706,0.00019707652,0.00062731974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799955,0.0004322149,0.0005258178,0.00038723368,0.0005258399,0.00012935203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069191074,0.00018155275,0.00065103476,0.00008342515,0.00009028146,0.000014801815,0.0004635948,0.0002884149,0.0014476158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005735493,0.00014092308,0.00024338278,0.00046096687,0.00032203566,0.000071166105,0.00018003726,0.00061113905,0.000025863801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009217731,0.0022457552,0.95839703,0.000038517195,0.0003488337,0.0022006817,0.0042615617,0.000043084692,0.013731564,0.0069402074,0.008481036,0.0023899795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025003524,0.00064675324,0.9853384,0.000030150248,0.00010929979,0.0013495772,0.004579201,0.000006804958,0.002105678,0.0010470455,0.0021428354,0.0001438951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045542554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009003489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026941402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017109615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029981975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172356715","doi":"10.1111/aje.12893","title":"Effect of high population density of eastern black rhinoceros, a mega‐browser, on the quality of its diet","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wageningen University and Research; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Zoological Society of London","keywords":"Rhinoceros; Biology; Nutrient; Herbivore; Population; Population density; Animal science; Ovis; Forage; Feces; Ecology; Agronomy; Demography","score_opus":0.018662218822447143,"score_gpt":0.2595172790550019,"score_spread":0.24085506023255474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172356715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99796647,0.00001588617,0.000021630833,0.0013698686,0.0001685803,0.00009377432,0.0000047373755,0.0000015497425,0.0003574985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996532,0.000011894379,0.000058372912,0.00017572616,0.000021704407,0.000001288606,0.0000018385168,0.000004002416,0.000071926384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798965,0.001015367,0.0005708416,0.00010654212,0.00019974586,0.000117865384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975972,0.0011081956,0.0010200234,0.00016223789,0.000075557226,0.000036743648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014693686,0.00007977363,0.0003830845,0.000033149332,0.000042056407,0.0000020170532,0.00017941637,0.000086652086,0.0006273555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087209523,0.000056190063,0.00010838448,0.00017828555,0.00021615517,0.000083533545,0.000077349316,0.00015028467,0.0000106093885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060704764,0.00013103739,0.99275774,0.00002558863,0.000059876675,0.0000058824166,0.00022252483,0.0005996548,0.004333877,0.00072293787,0.00024500975,0.00028884597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047287066,0.0017667873,0.9839039,0.000016001923,0.00005297191,0.000010064664,0.000085432075,0.000081712235,0.012722843,0.0008320383,0.000012899618,0.000042507287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013964101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006252604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008853846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006069561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029951769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6869103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192933880","doi":"10.1111/aje.12912","title":"Community awareness of critically endangered pancake tortoises (<i>Malacochersus tornieri</i>) in a village near Tarangire National Park, Tanzania: A pilot study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Critically endangered; Geography; National park; Endangered species; Ecology; Socioeconomics; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Sociology; Biology; Archaeology; Habitat","score_opus":0.036091815051101844,"score_gpt":0.2729216753301686,"score_spread":0.23682986027906675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192933880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972051,0.000066851775,0.00003835144,0.0008322082,0.00019988975,0.00009806874,0.000012231611,0.000004331152,0.0015429658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905676,0.000009274626,0.00043232835,0.0003959772,0.000031599662,0.000008959501,0.0000032731773,0.0000065102504,0.00005531379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801147,0.00094705983,0.0005074802,0.00012708771,0.00020983136,0.00019707196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885005,0.0005031637,0.0002566088,0.00014255519,0.0001763459,0.00007125566],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009407685,0.00010427052,0.0003289737,0.00004731361,0.00012744582,0.000010065695,0.000268842,0.00006720655,0.0009892149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009512054,0.000097687785,0.000054478875,0.00028954522,0.0003291893,0.00015103746,0.0001323559,0.00032460218,0.000009350561],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004306585,0.0019437127,0.9756545,0.0000067450437,0.00006177545,0.00018806783,0.001579729,0.00014980958,0.019270295,0.0000957128,0.00024798213,0.00037103682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011064953,0.0024519125,0.99134755,0.000010016573,0.000028330342,0.000091397946,0.0029523147,0.000025078589,0.0005198576,0.0008836627,0.0004922345,0.000091133916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024029912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008579175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018750437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018588794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023484483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221010537","doi":"10.1111/aje.12956","title":"Coupling paraecology and hunter GPS self‐follows to quantify village bushmeat hunting dynamics across the landscape scale","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Duke University","keywords":"Bushmeat; Geography; Global Positioning System; Environmental resource management; Scale (ratio); Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Computer science; Cartography; Wildlife","score_opus":0.007875536525172854,"score_gpt":0.23176586198918,"score_spread":0.22389032546400714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221010537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905557,0.000026725786,0.00011559762,0.007663785,0.0006128148,0.00015297234,0.000006390805,0.000011526463,0.00085450616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970343,0.000011366415,0.0004166948,0.0022574419,0.00006761341,0.000021736325,0.0000018123457,0.000011510118,0.00017749172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867105,0.00018345218,0.0003965588,0.00020478315,0.00015764091,0.00038650865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989,0.0004958122,0.000341198,0.00014466168,0.000023979248,0.0000943653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013887738,0.000114534916,0.00025912462,0.000054607874,0.00085484446,0.00002532846,0.00038649695,0.00007607423,0.0009810815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009629568,0.00009247271,0.00006527533,0.00027936092,0.00016386283,0.00011784655,0.0005107591,0.00040408337,0.000038548464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073072886,0.000066593835,0.9877789,0.0000016206697,0.00003531933,0.000041402032,0.0019797683,0.007931587,0.000113847746,0.00006414635,0.0014316428,0.00048210725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046632526,0.00077247655,0.977857,0.0000015834537,0.00003755307,0.00040822575,0.0066619436,0.009730801,0.000007413364,0.00017682742,0.0037659842,0.000113845286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040915595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026909776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009921869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020760241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034748075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248535727","doi":"10.1111/aje.12687","title":"Editorial","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Polar Research and Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Audience measurement; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Publishing; Ecology; Political science; Library science; Geography; Biology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.007032206067412964,"score_gpt":0.255698144445005,"score_spread":0.24866593837759202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248535727","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014038607,0.00014516682,0.000009697274,0.0007520018,0.97748595,0.00025856547,0.00010502693,0.000006521298,0.007198435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05014821,0.00088662887,0.00013766086,0.00006928036,0.946763,0.0000052616556,0.000013709543,0.000052585394,0.0019237122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450564,0.00084897084,0.0012357566,0.00048692594,0.0015618408,0.001360879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372464,0.0030598403,0.0018036553,0.00045846487,0.00027125824,0.00068214035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027108141,0.0004464973,0.0013898305,0.00038348706,0.00019536434,0.00009664203,0.0020107625,0.0016416166,0.011235937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050337818,0.00038899863,0.0005046454,0.00032599282,0.00086899335,0.00038235963,0.0007025373,0.0032365788,0.006748059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067324843,0.00026444506,0.011278336,0.000030122595,0.00024507756,0.00017739262,0.00013769217,0.00006736074,0.0005589647,0.00002680684,0.9856672,0.00087334815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017729533,0.006312839,0.007973474,0.000030954452,0.00012520023,0.0000997194,0.00015733847,0.0000082055285,0.000034138902,0.00048636028,0.9826644,0.00033442752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014558877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026657595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036109604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014633466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001593237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256682390","doi":"10.1111/aje.12603","title":"Modelling the distribution of a potential invasive tropical fern, <i>Cyclosorus afer </i>in Nigeria","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Tertiary Education Trust Fund","keywords":"Jackknife resampling; Geography; Precipitation; Principle of maximum entropy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental science; Statistics; Mathematics; Climatology; Meteorology; Geology; Estimator","score_opus":0.013728223048532363,"score_gpt":0.21305913341682275,"score_spread":0.1993309103682904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256682390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99569803,0.00002696574,0.0006146076,0.0011714263,0.0002558117,0.00009612573,0.000021411142,0.0000020747875,0.002113571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997212,0.000064419255,0.000024293544,0.00009135849,0.000029843599,0.0000021123462,0.0000058370615,0.0000041869725,0.00005672495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990383,0.0001089782,0.00035894976,0.00010108464,0.00018350678,0.00020920007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994337,0.000098442615,0.00027175093,0.00011074947,0.000028659098,0.000056681893],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002032417,0.00007546745,0.0002115787,0.00002399855,0.000036758716,0.0000083757495,0.00024075118,0.00006277275,0.010289506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050622442,0.000052492207,0.00009838829,0.00016581781,0.00016962552,0.00008595676,0.00007968126,0.0001726371,0.00014373891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063186465,0.0005694642,0.89542055,0.0000149448415,0.00006449754,0.00009685324,0.00127156,0.07743421,0.016191198,0.0035266608,0.004501459,0.00027676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016984617,0.000855232,0.97944397,0.00001730958,0.00003709989,0.00019097245,0.006919007,0.00265796,0.0014815383,0.0016613122,0.0048554307,0.00018173808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004706965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019256066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08402341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031379476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002639013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99061525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293858237","doi":"10.1111/aje.12972","title":"Monitoring sitatunga (<i>Tragelaphus spekii</i>) populations using camera traps","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Camera trap; Mark and recapture; Population density; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Population; Population size; Wildlife; Habitat; Wildlife management; Ecology; Statistics; Environmental science; Mathematics; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.03507054884059714,"score_gpt":0.2570488595929521,"score_spread":0.22197831075235497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293858237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99629694,0.00005483154,0.00021186404,0.001151342,0.0012182503,0.00006560366,0.0000029516304,0.0000073118063,0.0009909027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645585,0.000005939622,0.0029356112,0.00031870208,0.00012486981,0.000004978756,7.4632254e-7,0.00000885398,0.00014447948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998875,0.00024675913,0.0003505045,0.00011958908,0.00017878231,0.0002293593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993247,0.0001162282,0.00036350382,0.00009717537,0.000016132886,0.000082259765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039820382,0.00008122178,0.00017177123,0.00009581416,0.00046757815,0.000008220278,0.00023636564,0.00004065176,0.0023641556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066787725,0.00008624315,0.00007982448,0.00031080344,0.000103198276,0.00019443987,0.000111733556,0.00036408362,0.000017523042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033212476,0.00008881233,0.9772572,7.264201e-7,0.000020934318,0.0000878953,0.00053677225,0.018062552,0.0020439706,0.000076947465,0.0009309363,0.0008600769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029919858,0.00035403908,0.9937962,0.000002010453,0.00004512526,0.00047019936,0.0011543788,0.00037711536,0.000045273777,0.0011633718,0.0022016894,0.00009138959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052235246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007331117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017685436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035690688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005552476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297473644","doi":"10.1111/aje.13063","title":"Decline in whistling rat (<i>Parotomys brantsii</i>) density: Possible response to climate change in the Karoo, South Africa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prince Albert Grand Council","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Arid; Cape; Ecology; Vegetation (pathology); Shrub; Perennial plant; Burrow; Vegetation cover; Biology; Archaeology; Grazing","score_opus":0.021309919598757037,"score_gpt":0.25741591128084235,"score_spread":0.23610599168208532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297473644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98885316,0.000068836605,0.000021031077,0.009526294,0.00028597325,0.00029554556,0.000005273249,0.000004612075,0.00093930354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960077,0.000020658388,0.00039557123,0.003387934,0.000031089487,0.00008867914,5.0440633e-7,0.000008528538,0.00005935804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976347,0.0010563971,0.00048258077,0.00018585767,0.00022303105,0.00041739686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876803,0.00071745156,0.00029064194,0.0001413344,0.000017713006,0.000064844025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039570886,0.00011243917,0.00029594178,0.0002673428,0.00032170492,0.000012225562,0.00047371985,0.000043898017,0.0003727384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033538876,0.000091366506,0.00006165452,0.0007640517,0.00012700952,0.00010965183,0.0005092465,0.00045426117,0.000045702574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012596503,0.00021824485,0.9517676,0.000002568125,0.000011577227,0.0004912087,0.039017856,0.0060882964,0.00036639796,0.00012206948,0.00026167248,0.00039284912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091367465,0.0009457603,0.98732305,0.000005688248,0.000015831029,0.00014535355,0.0070897276,0.0005193894,0.000008570588,0.0010574348,0.001858694,0.000116801515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025999596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046855444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035555467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031888537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003573623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40812242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308826878","doi":"10.1111/aje.13082","title":"Interspecies teamwork: Evidence of interspecific foraging associations between Cape foxes and striped polecats in the southern Kalahari","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Foraging; Interspecific competition; Cape; Geography; Ecology; Kleptoparasitism; Zoology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03303978167198998,"score_gpt":0.25476154845205135,"score_spread":0.22172176678006136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308826878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99049723,0.00011066937,0.000056745914,0.008633775,0.00011314205,0.00008496645,0.000009618269,0.0000022170368,0.00049164036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935037,0.000018367651,0.000114960174,0.0004181277,0.000035913115,0.000006367658,9.858159e-7,0.000003842664,0.000051061532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877757,0.00043098268,0.0003752016,0.00010145425,0.0001586488,0.00015616772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838316,0.0009863247,0.00049602287,0.000089527326,0.000018582714,0.00002635144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013340742,0.00006310479,0.00019220293,0.00010261662,0.00016404098,0.000010483261,0.00036550578,0.00003270966,0.00039753717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027669963,0.00005134963,0.0000462656,0.0002835409,0.00020454633,0.00014642879,0.00017537888,0.0003209152,0.000004160816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027318563,0.000045799654,0.98609823,0.0000010221453,0.000022144235,0.0000070474925,0.0112932725,0.00013253937,0.000106187625,0.00016347451,0.0015222601,0.0005807283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021116559,0.00038402632,0.9683076,0.000008393,0.000027409242,0.00001999791,0.028475853,0.000024518673,0.000007951352,0.0022302787,0.00025515739,0.000047661855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011733271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007397071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017790617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022560498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037991897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43527532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310272937","doi":"10.1111/aje.13090","title":"Attitudes of people living near Rau Forest Reserve, Tanzania towards Mount Kilimanjaro black and white colobus monkeys (<i>Colobus caudatus</i>)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Mount; Geography; White (mutation); Ecology; Forest reserve; Home range; Forestry; Zoology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.021169943132562916,"score_gpt":0.2868127026766272,"score_spread":0.26564275954406424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310272937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99177307,0.00026187647,0.000027145152,0.0010778231,0.001556363,0.00034119748,0.00008892259,0.000025164873,0.004848422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819833,0.00009558462,0.00064103695,0.000341849,0.00012124434,0.00005640028,0.0000071393106,0.000052314135,0.00048607215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626243,0.00087261817,0.0011907535,0.0004493578,0.00036634906,0.0008584746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969943,0.00071202236,0.0012155093,0.000491534,0.00029668238,0.00028990634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015155267,0.00031024037,0.0011033965,0.00040845634,0.0003867623,0.000037659698,0.00085438194,0.00023323555,0.006606666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002883144,0.00031274208,0.0002367303,0.0005416164,0.0005374351,0.00018318337,0.00078672846,0.00088161376,0.000029469888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076384406,0.0011214998,0.9783014,0.00004440993,0.000295657,0.0005313757,0.007561832,0.001138356,0.0008214226,0.0006729321,0.008416945,0.0003303293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017107814,0.0041713156,0.98145103,0.00001320802,0.00022575697,0.0013598009,0.0067789364,0.00011321311,0.00002096752,0.00023660323,0.0036494068,0.0002690001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006007297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030081635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006577196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004983426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004131924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313408291","doi":"10.1111/aje.13095","title":"Mitigating crop raiding by forest elephants and baboons at Kibale National Park","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"National park; Wildlife; Human–wildlife conflict; Geography; Agroforestry; Bushmeat; Crop; Wildlife conservation; Ecology; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010164410207796473,"score_gpt":0.21233861792154285,"score_spread":0.2021742077137464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313408291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942582,0.000044264816,0.000020152753,0.0028656775,0.00018478384,0.000050716175,0.0000096014965,0.0000038680264,0.0025626898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766886,0.000007363914,0.0003407096,0.0013684524,0.000038847673,0.0000048416746,0.00000331335,0.000005524141,0.00056210166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991095,0.00016212504,0.00025019958,0.00011493107,0.00018313697,0.0001800728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992858,0.00028319098,0.00030161403,0.00003940831,0.000016901335,0.00007304067],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006232165,0.00006259046,0.00012454407,0.000041813775,0.0004871224,0.000007041976,0.000143281,0.000032921922,0.0030446562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017629421,0.000063723994,0.00003176045,0.00012304923,0.00016485044,0.00013019153,0.00020086547,0.00017756477,0.000017823058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032967655,0.000044077107,0.9600323,8.0327857e-7,0.000017460758,0.000018633338,0.000310585,0.0009032412,0.0024420705,0.00011342332,0.03585849,0.00022595463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004902179,0.00035818253,0.9843153,0.0000015560937,0.000013335194,0.00042800241,0.0004818918,0.00035123655,0.00007294708,0.0021250725,0.01128152,0.00008075749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000113347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024276218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024576968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002907802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040459505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319789818","doi":"10.1111/aje.13122","title":"Modelling the current and future distribution of <i>Caesalpinia bonduc</i> (L.) Roxb: Its implication for future conservation of the species in the Southern Benin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Barley","funders":"Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Caesalpinia; Habitat; Conservation status; Evapotranspiration; Species distribution; Geography; Representative Concentration Pathways; Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Agroforestry; Climate change; Environmental science; Biology; General Circulation Model","score_opus":0.03577476525087172,"score_gpt":0.25499551759122197,"score_spread":0.21922075234035024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319789818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97525376,0.0001595423,0.0001192767,0.02364146,0.00023526422,0.0002276126,0.00022061168,0.000002423232,0.00014006648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930847,0.00040749033,0.000007997287,0.00008584658,0.00012774643,0.00001268428,0.000029949962,0.0000035474557,0.000016288926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920756,0.00010523762,0.00031880185,0.00007960947,0.00015809346,0.00013071879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920535,0.00015771289,0.00044471654,0.00011659846,0.000056382778,0.00001923849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063801237,0.000066349996,0.00013005733,0.000019876632,0.000109665176,0.000009349202,0.00025981286,0.00004326057,0.00016785333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046974208,0.000034138713,0.00007005097,0.00037317982,0.00016671234,0.000058952777,0.000052545245,0.00013993765,0.0000035126607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001065079,0.0012733731,0.4952268,0.000314407,0.00020073599,0.0000058756077,0.08101086,0.021577265,0.058368143,0.12383999,0.18632016,0.030797318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049260736,0.00016057419,0.86085176,0.000011427072,0.000042632146,0.000016655336,0.038387172,0.0022857788,0.0005021408,0.0013372503,0.095840916,0.000071088965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013942288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015761041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36562496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088884386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019285071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18378761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321490588","doi":"10.1111/aje.13133","title":"The effects of the invasive species, <i>Lantana camara</i>, on regeneration of an African rainforest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Lantana camara; Lantana; Shrub; Invasive species; Biology; Clearance; Verbenaceae; Species diversity; Forest restoration; Ecology; Agroforestry; Forest ecology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.00688190438787331,"score_gpt":0.2059666665732723,"score_spread":0.199084762185399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321490588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924722,0.00002538808,0.0000091326065,0.0019713505,0.00052282977,0.0001408233,0.0000038399626,0.000003414925,0.004851027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989208,0.0001875772,0.00004180762,0.0001593469,0.000040686973,0.0000056686695,0.0000010433478,0.000005046546,0.00063803024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989509,0.00026364732,0.00035168513,0.00008574587,0.00017648401,0.00017155781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756867,0.0015660679,0.0006142335,0.00016776082,0.000043367316,0.000039915936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057116145,0.000077751174,0.00019702152,0.00005613519,0.00025458072,0.000004982428,0.00035580256,0.000049171995,0.00003756066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008684619,0.00004400583,0.00007705728,0.00035883207,0.0006323852,0.000068280235,0.00010314434,0.00014822214,0.000012108433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045273625,0.0003959617,0.8716494,0.000061731465,0.00042264714,0.00010937534,0.010875089,0.030438993,0.038926356,0.021398593,0.022067484,0.0032016633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000379566,0.0013208372,0.988443,0.0000124005455,0.000036131943,0.000020855408,0.0012393169,0.00031824925,0.004267955,0.0030476411,0.0008580598,0.000055973527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001955117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050329873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11679364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084660955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005380962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2808525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322738282","doi":"10.1111/aje.13137","title":"Demography and reproductive seasonality of small terrestrial mammals in two forest ecosystems in Ghana","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Transect; Biology; Evergreen forest; Sex ratio; Reproduction; Juvenile; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Forest ecology; Evergreen; Seasonal breeder; Population; Ecosystem; Demography","score_opus":0.02767136546656063,"score_gpt":0.27753441544813306,"score_spread":0.24986304998157244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322738282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99862087,0.000053870033,0.000002766858,0.00054952846,0.0001977965,0.00012921811,0.0000038091184,0.0000033526653,0.00043881417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971354,0.000030263598,0.0001571289,0.000016669803,0.000047871632,0.0000073242477,4.807792e-7,0.000004328571,0.00002237801],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987876,0.00023477367,0.00046544624,0.00019017856,0.00008595799,0.0002360639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999295,0.00023641382,0.00032397392,0.0000821804,0.000011542204,0.000050918024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013134971,0.00008518198,0.00036900834,0.00011769274,0.000037134545,0.0000027858532,0.00014371354,0.000053711716,0.00007846928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002444756,0.000073022646,0.000057927955,0.00048435293,0.00035247166,0.00007560617,0.0001365086,0.00018739757,0.0000073096057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018486538,0.00009388967,0.9977627,0.0000039268143,0.00001804669,0.00014338792,0.00057637366,0.00014805097,0.00029576995,0.000047327845,0.000119580545,0.0006060749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081899605,0.00049127685,0.9960654,0.000010498573,0.000018379524,0.00004331442,0.0013868118,0.00005100985,0.0000435368,0.00093783473,0.000069993905,0.00006298529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042130536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05554276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055121455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008177914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022695585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96169114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366599275","doi":"10.1111/aje.13153","title":"Teeth, tusks, and spikes: Repeated den sharing between predator and prey in an African Savannah","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Porcupine; Clan; Predation; Predator; Ecology; Geography; Cohabitation; Biology; Zoology; Archaeology; Anthropology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02354363511807355,"score_gpt":0.2535672933319866,"score_spread":0.23002365821391302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366599275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979098,0.000022734943,0.000007682235,0.0012865784,0.000076715296,0.000109995,0.000003294983,0.000016069844,0.00056715106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.000030743096,0.0002467404,0.00015405347,0.00005578719,0.0000060825605,0.0000031171762,0.000009261976,0.00012395294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888164,0.00014878243,0.00037250711,0.00023132532,0.00009591347,0.00026984807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992513,0.00022232985,0.00023359101,0.00012226142,0.000015635274,0.00015486931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008401512,0.00009878862,0.00024791108,0.00015867093,0.00009407344,0.000019751165,0.00020278338,0.00010908277,0.00016857582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023235801,0.0000923531,0.000020665491,0.0003424962,0.00022532753,0.00035418247,0.00017570893,0.00022030395,0.000021380749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040431652,0.0000273396,0.9967354,0.0000033201488,0.000014772186,0.00006279588,0.0011238555,0.00006668176,0.00025020636,0.000020224696,0.00034480967,0.0013101724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044507493,0.000567287,0.9957878,0.000008721461,0.000028072116,0.000052575288,0.00076153444,0.0002729561,0.000029923722,0.0016459366,0.00030728552,0.00009280838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000062052415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016544595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016257119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008213565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029060871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.376605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366771250","doi":"10.1111/aje.13151","title":"<scp>Human‐wildlife</scp> conflicts in communities bordering a <scp>Savannah‐Fenced</scp> wildlife conservancy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fencing; Wildlife; Fence (mathematics); Geography; Livestock; Population; Habitat; National park; Pastoralism; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology; Forestry; Engineering; Archaeology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.02761544994836591,"score_gpt":0.254664743500147,"score_spread":0.2270492935517811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366771250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865634,0.00006864609,0.000034504654,0.0026853122,0.00065218384,0.00024837797,0.000008542019,0.00007017902,0.009668899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916786,0.00019230072,0.00027501956,0.0057100323,0.00012482917,0.000039050738,0.000011588301,0.000035946297,0.0019326366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681413,0.0005958627,0.0010447894,0.00028276956,0.0003560711,0.0009063632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956468,0.0028064197,0.0008274897,0.00037107564,0.00008141139,0.000266849],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015855718,0.00031052108,0.0006734764,0.00044802646,0.0004370191,0.000048647886,0.00090054516,0.0002921105,0.0002681761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001453558,0.00031925878,0.00015271037,0.0009973696,0.0008354678,0.00054950913,0.00042401478,0.0008828137,0.00047735224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084346275,0.00014810303,0.92941135,0.000013832605,0.000059385187,0.0002746522,0.0068631163,0.002418095,0.00025854638,0.0003276184,0.06008667,0.00013020945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001124922,0.00061967364,0.91331685,0.00005069911,0.000034839424,0.00017706561,0.011656056,0.00039754502,0.000049615068,0.0023379547,0.07015721,0.00007756001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032441132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040909913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016094472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026008885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015030542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367183366","doi":"10.1111/aje.13160","title":"Land use change and forest patch analysis as a decision‐making tool to sustainably develop plantation agriculture and optimize biodiversity conservation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Sustainability; Agriculture; Geography; Agroforestry; Land use; Sustainable development; Intact forest landscape; Environmental resource management; Biodiversity conservation; Ecology; Forest ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.023806698498768267,"score_gpt":0.2232299464227452,"score_spread":0.19942324792397695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367183366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99622846,0.000008247575,0.0004540441,0.0030351311,0.000045060096,0.00016703538,0.000011929197,0.000008847022,0.00004125082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697095,0.00010430102,0.0019146362,0.0008808141,0.000015391211,0.000002452893,0.000009858615,0.0000016915309,0.00009990896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992876,0.000058879137,0.0001773222,0.00015461948,0.00016376495,0.00015779753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937916,0.0002303928,0.00017731368,0.00005781724,0.00007545891,0.00007984062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036473735,0.00008083315,0.00016776731,0.00026870245,0.00024580918,0.00005965524,0.00009960473,0.000051918818,0.00008103633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022662041,0.00006476863,0.000033597138,0.0010428571,0.00006865276,0.00022913388,0.0002597696,0.000060375645,0.000020156416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010068382,0.000014637644,0.99141014,0.0000043532436,0.000090297675,0.000090874746,0.0024540618,0.0016043902,0.00000981468,0.0000044565363,0.0025166662,0.0016995977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034819008,0.0001409152,0.9906738,0.00000615263,0.00019563461,0.000021300419,0.003089772,0.00047327185,0.0000014659006,0.00010191519,0.0048590936,0.000088487504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008662189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053589423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044927234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010180735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012664024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29904154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376608841","doi":"10.1111/aje.13165","title":"Leopards living at the farmland‐protected area interface prefer wild prey but consume high biomass of livestock","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Leopard; Panthera; Livestock; Geography; Capra hircus; Carnivore; Rangeland; Predation; Ecology; Agroforestry; Biology; Forestry; Animal science","score_opus":0.01911490123639465,"score_gpt":0.22645036136615201,"score_spread":0.20733546012975737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376608841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99614376,0.000036115205,0.000070269736,0.0024536408,0.00033828587,0.00019051734,0.000007762157,0.000017930723,0.00074170064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823195,0.000020821846,0.000121792174,0.00016440854,0.000032851814,0.000015371104,0.0000012769959,0.0000097595885,0.0014017834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986644,0.00030611712,0.000437631,0.0001585924,0.00016371941,0.00026955962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847096,0.0006819206,0.00054602145,0.00018471669,0.00004419221,0.00007219168],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007269064,0.000115885254,0.00026107312,0.0000856573,0.00015840078,0.000008287136,0.00037338678,0.00011676153,0.0021649618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005127739,0.00008151146,0.000073615156,0.00034863543,0.00046640343,0.00012290438,0.00030065636,0.00023471958,0.0001990149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011431016,0.00006796752,0.98247975,0.000005951457,0.00007270265,0.000019795654,0.0010331518,0.000764677,0.008490037,0.000014871021,0.0065822853,0.00035447624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029614783,0.0006264427,0.995427,0.000019252175,0.00004460287,0.00011255123,0.00038362888,0.00015605037,0.0011014749,0.00026822355,0.0014787519,0.00008585866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010534889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010591827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012947241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014830474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054168293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380151598","doi":"10.1111/aje.13181","title":"Future climate change projections in the agroecological, bioclimatic, biogeographical and altitudinal vegetation zones of Morocco","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ouranos","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Precipitation; Representative Concentration Pathways; Climatology; Climate model; Downscaling; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Mean radiant temperature; Geography; Physical geography; Ecology; Meteorology; Geology","score_opus":0.0358422826586603,"score_gpt":0.2709983008385909,"score_spread":0.2351560181799306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380151598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944595,0.000051457944,0.0000099035,0.0047013345,0.00015237942,0.00019695789,0.0000061197807,0.0000064399214,0.00041589202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836415,0.0009518644,0.00041916402,0.00016930704,0.00006503048,0.000024427825,0.0000016200584,0.0000033226515,0.0000011417283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989567,0.0002059933,0.0003606641,0.00011885872,0.0001396796,0.00021812851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993035,0.000317862,0.00023180748,0.00008763509,0.000017910814,0.000041242638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011818439,0.000075278804,0.00020663215,0.00017577648,0.00009737012,0.000009537283,0.0001588163,0.00008021272,0.00012999293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009260166,0.00004769629,0.000060839622,0.000702114,0.0003210909,0.00013198952,0.0000895363,0.00016985396,0.000011666151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000639378,0.00038446687,0.9890695,0.000045013454,0.000020081117,0.00004517656,0.0040534064,0.00036909495,0.0013846217,0.0028371487,0.00022398759,0.0015035177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027104918,0.00056341034,0.9909288,0.000010055951,0.000029816681,0.00008963109,0.0024892634,0.00084659364,0.000009587758,0.004445718,0.00026197828,0.000054043503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038285994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006949949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004532027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028559345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008383309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19449982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384694519","doi":"10.1111/aje.13194","title":"Ecology in a troubled continent","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.016042188259526607,"score_gpt":0.2547942957134615,"score_spread":0.2387521074539349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384694519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908617,0.000012626426,0.0000032003834,0.0036342612,0.00037528406,0.00007473142,8.783294e-7,0.000011111197,0.005026175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989235,0.00005179609,0.00013384786,0.00024333682,0.000034695808,0.000010225794,3.986354e-7,0.0000060533293,0.0005961908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989176,0.00012450748,0.00039036694,0.00012973629,0.000087205444,0.00035058768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999386,0.00023952185,0.00022628976,0.00006712867,0.0000148742565,0.00006615715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005999583,0.00008778161,0.00032538775,0.00014571827,0.00006854627,0.0000032172454,0.00021914493,0.00009125535,0.0021978472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015594815,0.000072890405,0.000071598355,0.000390221,0.00027393285,0.00007692932,0.0001631365,0.00022702261,0.0006147371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008923029,0.00011961353,0.99037945,9.962857e-7,0.000016910371,0.0005399517,0.00039829072,0.00017373358,0.0010497564,0.00015400717,0.00648321,0.00059482176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007400325,0.000874484,0.99187696,0.0000018602059,0.000019236844,0.000099779165,0.00074255554,0.000026978529,0.000038718765,0.00071274856,0.004796925,0.00006972122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002273127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025831715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008061723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001485928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026313044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388458678","doi":"10.1111/aje.13227","title":"An AI‐based platform to investigate African large carnivore dispersal and demography across broad landscapes: A case study and future directions using African wild dogs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Community College","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Carnivore; Biological dispersal; Endangered species; Geography; Ecology; Population; Identification (biology); Ursus; Cartography; Biology; Habitat; Demography","score_opus":0.015684942900708716,"score_gpt":0.27394256278402274,"score_spread":0.258257619883314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388458678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99643224,0.00003210335,0.000045946086,0.0027898687,0.00028212418,0.00028902802,0.000027572287,0.000036163427,0.00006497211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985502,0.000016451062,0.00037739563,0.0008328482,0.00016929916,0.000018400904,0.0000029800221,0.000019070969,0.000013398283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835664,0.00022825328,0.00038924278,0.0003408597,0.0001719725,0.00051300233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988751,0.00019045427,0.00026018822,0.00018072658,0.00004031518,0.00045325287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008321497,0.0002015222,0.00035668767,0.00026499355,0.00071494345,0.00005800536,0.00018191832,0.00012853394,0.00006829893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007493873,0.00017766471,0.00006339869,0.0011600333,0.0002817528,0.0003933937,0.00013340794,0.00034893953,0.00000520591],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010321164,0.00021536298,0.98135626,0.000003901126,0.00006435404,0.0010742627,0.015122593,0.0003685219,0.00010687135,0.0000133245085,0.00025060243,0.0013207276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011719984,0.0017640833,0.9306796,0.0000062864387,0.000109808774,0.0015858986,0.05650885,0.0041324417,0.000004132988,0.000101788675,0.0037139454,0.00022113057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000749979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034518912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05067663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101421465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006312263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390395846","doi":"10.1111/aje.13250","title":"Does <i>Ficus</i> species fruit mastication and ingestion by Wahlberg's epauletted fruit bats enhance seed germination and seedling emergence?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Seedling; Frugivore; Ficus; Germination; Biology; Seed dispersal; Ingestion; Mastication; Biological dispersal; Seed predation; Botany; Agronomy; Horticulture; Ecology","score_opus":0.014147754346318105,"score_gpt":0.22310386390208667,"score_spread":0.20895610955576857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390395846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97909355,0.00024759356,0.000007504734,0.019933632,0.0004582546,0.0000897749,0.000016005404,0.000023573457,0.00013012733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978951,0.0011235717,0.000055109238,0.0002552772,0.0002153847,0.000008897233,0.00001842085,0.0000011665722,0.0004270542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895793,0.00014390558,0.00033949176,0.00021182669,0.00007996386,0.0002668613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870044,0.0007440123,0.00032092276,0.000028245384,0.00013329713,0.00007308952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005327152,0.00012429612,0.00026845044,0.000039668943,0.00032175146,0.00001834333,0.0001169713,0.0001620374,0.00015203077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003740841,0.000048206974,0.00003565802,0.0002973068,0.00025584915,0.00014242559,0.000076364326,0.00018400725,0.000010843642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012952976,0.00007803719,0.61195225,0.000014407737,0.00011754892,0.00003054078,0.0007705598,0.0000063738103,0.3648934,0.00027140515,0.008284556,0.013451395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013023152,0.0004928892,0.9896408,0.000010983737,0.00003970724,0.000041529056,0.0018958242,0.000047810114,0.0023691175,0.0013817189,0.003828103,0.00012132358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012740111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074036146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3776885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018757211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008538801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24746847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401975250","doi":"10.1111/aje.13316","title":"Assessing the Effect of Predator Control on Black‐Footed Cat Survival in Central South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Predator; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Predation","score_opus":0.010344442874135525,"score_gpt":0.24003906293858301,"score_spread":0.2296946200644475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401975250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99559385,0.000029429684,0.00011065009,0.0018133466,0.0005972992,0.00014299322,0.0000034679695,0.0000060739667,0.0017028658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997194,0.0000024234748,0.000029889656,0.000110309345,0.000073776246,0.0000042846555,4.861597e-7,0.000007476981,0.0000519455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983667,0.00070174196,0.00037779912,0.00013135996,0.00015656171,0.0002657971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810624,0.0014929156,0.00022889266,0.00010418304,0.000010456464,0.00005733353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012954958,0.00009999837,0.00027093804,0.00008194821,0.00005227606,0.000022846987,0.00023393543,0.00008906168,0.00037485448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034876438,0.0000628358,0.000087444634,0.0002691975,0.00029388,0.00016529774,0.000034845707,0.00027887782,0.000039591487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001696963,0.000041640196,0.9934859,0.0000075548933,0.000052882922,0.00007304696,0.0014897315,0.0028621852,0.00051814446,0.00008538935,0.00065501773,0.00055877387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007020978,0.0011589873,0.9950495,0.000022453502,0.000059058475,0.000018869652,0.00043863442,0.0018845022,0.00012706245,0.00018868846,0.00029064214,0.000059548554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013682607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010892691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041255346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018136275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006816602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41043937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407979431","doi":"10.1111/aje.70030","title":"Weaving the Middle Spaces Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation and Ecology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Biodiversity; Weaving; Geography; Ecology; Applied ecology; Environmental resource management; Biology; Zoology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02326646956674391,"score_gpt":0.22903654297601184,"score_spread":0.20577007340926792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407979431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944117,0.0002075512,0.0002816631,0.0037318803,0.00035671346,0.0002456663,0.000004098289,0.0000036672257,0.0007570734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858195,0.000029726249,0.00021844696,0.00012641554,0.000025606805,0.0000051892157,0.0000012957157,0.0000016832328,0.0010096843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934447,0.0001236114,0.0001719175,0.00013707556,0.000038148053,0.00018476509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990326,0.0006550972,0.00017851737,0.000066176406,0.000024440076,0.0000431354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008616874,0.00006595533,0.00017333304,0.000117494004,0.0005964623,0.000038308324,0.00017399396,0.00005873163,0.000062352134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114607654,0.000048234997,0.00002853815,0.00015984547,0.00058879785,0.00009865846,0.00018887,0.000100801284,0.0000072194644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024184814,0.000030006897,0.98810977,0.000009909712,0.000048803155,0.0000021449612,0.0020767818,0.000008089984,0.00008742116,0.00022677089,0.006779977,0.0025961662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004698431,0.0003731918,0.9403792,0.000003301404,0.00009543588,0.000008228168,0.0015102527,0.00003243295,0.000016447544,0.002363571,0.054700445,0.0000476196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037526122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018492765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04792047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033966902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4587566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408373117","doi":"10.1111/aje.70032","title":"Okapi Survival Threats: A Population Reconstruction and Threat Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Geography; Biology; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.009872562001154694,"score_gpt":0.29338835583953493,"score_spread":0.2835157938383802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408373117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970553,0.00044281245,0.00054079125,0.0004847905,0.00024734339,0.00006417994,0.00000581788,0.0000025848701,0.0011563651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846303,0.00029561415,0.00075699977,0.0000497281,0.00009633395,0.000002153316,0.000019749214,0.0000056009076,0.00031077894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906516,0.00017225556,0.00030877767,0.00018059519,0.0000843128,0.00018886999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931663,0.00006700793,0.00019528234,0.00015404164,0.0001965169,0.0000705098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040643045,0.00009370036,0.00028934405,0.0003859401,0.00007692686,0.000023201428,0.00012425447,0.0001308688,0.000049812727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017913905,0.00008524257,0.00011815337,0.0003938764,0.00010055992,0.000009378325,0.0000604709,0.00012911408,0.0000012832203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025366334,0.000034918336,0.9414168,0.0000070184647,0.000745108,0.000009096973,0.0000264325,0.000056232493,0.049185466,0.00011424355,0.000099851175,0.008051184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005787363,0.0004869295,0.99306434,0.000007190623,0.00030836902,0.00015538247,0.00022091916,0.00008373538,0.0039363587,0.0006590143,0.00040898283,0.000090027264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002969535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000465979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05164757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044443856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009238537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34760913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414246649","doi":"10.1111/aje.70103","title":"Economic Growth, Governance and Endangered Species Conservation in Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Poaching; Corporate governance; Endangered species; Wildlife; Population; Biodiversity; Per capita; Wildlife conservation; Habitat; Environmental governance","score_opus":0.009808680991710993,"score_gpt":0.1837689110436945,"score_spread":0.1739602300519835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414246649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96337193,0.00007683074,0.0000294367,0.009655073,0.00016515609,0.000062456995,0.000002781522,0.00000263477,0.026633713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974991,0.00018227892,0.00021536819,0.0003988746,0.00001607611,0.0000010404601,3.0738641e-7,0.0000015630972,0.0016853886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994478,0.000052395008,0.00021690449,0.00010056606,0.000059061684,0.00012324503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996112,0.00010891706,0.00018168165,0.000057429486,0.000010112758,0.000030667994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026183447,0.000057931626,0.0001368786,0.0000740907,0.000060288614,0.000013641288,0.00014670078,0.00003230347,0.00046975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060890452,0.000054239885,0.000027574617,0.00012898722,0.00017641668,0.00009492829,0.00013263315,0.00007355769,0.000016951131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032063606,0.00002798379,0.9913835,0.000004174202,0.000014632821,0.000014011126,0.0005432066,0.00006942068,0.000126596,0.0005368017,0.006552271,0.0006953687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040243956,0.00006642014,0.9396012,0.0000061911883,0.000013123633,0.000005351373,0.0006315395,0.00007310801,0.00003929747,0.0011808111,0.057934586,0.00004594036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019599867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021919757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051782276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029000646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023566005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5143433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414247262","doi":"10.1111/aje.70102","title":"Willingness to Pay for Forest Restoration in Togo: Comparison of Estimates From Choice Experiment, Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"German Academic Exchange Service; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Afforestation; Recreation; Biodiversity; Valuation (finance); Forest cover; Preference; Cost–benefit analysis","score_opus":0.17191327622181063,"score_gpt":0.3700646766064281,"score_spread":0.19815140038461748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414247262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8477684,0.0005414619,0.150246,0.00064208335,0.000301003,0.00032207218,0.000015661546,0.0000011786274,0.00016214668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96880597,0.00003178371,0.030958302,0.00008458824,0.000030705436,0.000048661503,0.000011381111,0.000006027744,0.000022607246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988159,0.00004378551,0.00086877355,0.00014558743,0.00001638479,0.00010958608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860096,0.0005636169,0.0006888669,0.00007395261,0.000034712208,0.000037905837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000939914,0.00007447102,0.00043891702,0.00019552954,0.00003517279,0.000015741556,0.00008686076,0.00006228851,0.00003350913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043880043,0.00007646218,0.00004318493,0.000082783146,0.0000331507,0.00013280618,0.000022592087,0.0000655736,0.0000028247534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043466403,0.00008925054,0.9874393,0.00000849859,0.000037844642,7.730653e-8,0.0010209439,0.0033431542,0.0011988257,0.0033002333,0.00011067628,0.0034077482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009561558,0.0002910676,0.9592778,0.000018376018,0.000015597514,3.3988871e-7,0.0010545058,0.014737613,0.0015234808,0.021556925,0.0004984218,0.00006969977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023109441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003631643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12103754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018119578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022979339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31180373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116882375","doi":"10.1111/aje.70136","title":"Public Preferences for Forest Restoration in Togo","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Ecology","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"German Academic Exchange Service; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Biodiversity; Preference; Sample (material); Status quo; Willingness to pay; Population; Carbon sequestration; Perception; Biodiversity conservation","score_opus":0.17595351428695807,"score_gpt":0.24548739761369,"score_spread":0.06953388332673194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116882375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814316,0.00032374173,0.003447092,0.0026487173,0.00048103213,0.00011790596,0.000007904148,0.0000019054175,0.011540126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855816,0.00007812877,0.00082105084,0.00016769514,0.000044066517,0.00001652633,0.0000036684526,0.0000035511455,0.00030712085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919236,0.00001723471,0.00055950443,0.00009964423,0.000009465719,0.000121772624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993632,0.00011266125,0.00041411858,0.00006642859,0.000018394398,0.00002522219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007023439,0.000048894908,0.0002197947,0.0003199298,0.00003210515,0.0000178413,0.00012608901,0.00005812043,0.00011888698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002269495,0.00005376576,0.000052158142,0.00009825608,0.000036597736,0.00021296105,0.000016350688,0.000070697024,0.000020502466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017529259,0.00004926976,0.872266,0.0000048521474,0.000018522058,4.0386442e-7,0.0000910753,0.00033755833,0.0000061203564,0.12560667,0.0008038245,0.00079818483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005641016,0.00020899002,0.81187904,0.000004205109,0.0000032614312,0.0000016920686,0.00017718361,0.00045223147,0.000006792779,0.17924938,0.0074081575,0.000044985794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015266136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005303287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060386974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020337266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044294764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21925043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}