{"meta":{"query_hash":"6f9800a270fb","filters":{"venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6f9800a270fb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=African+Journal+of+International+and+Comparative+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W2061118762","doi":"10.3366/e0954889008000145","title":"THE MARITIME ZONES OF EAST AFRICAN STATES IN THE LAW OF THE SEA: BENEFITS GAINED, OPPORTUNITIES MISSED","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Convention; Freedom of navigation; Political science; Law of the sea; Exclusive economic zone; Geography; State (computer science); Maritime boundary; International law; Law; International trade; Public international law; Business","score_opus":0.0608134506213649,"score_gpt":0.24803491117315624,"score_spread":0.18722146055179134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061118762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88348144,0.00037970158,0.000021703583,0.01037758,0.00013282459,0.00012387129,0.00006446745,0.0000022424504,0.10541617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987026,0.00013087715,0.00015198736,0.0004409885,0.00004658012,0.0000049320433,0.0000026587466,0.000004155103,0.00051520637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983975,0.00020231621,0.0004884424,0.00009307511,0.000693386,0.00012522277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986727,0.00053580885,0.0004609394,0.00011340633,0.0001785091,0.000038588594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042634434,0.00011575584,0.00020980746,0.000029191915,0.000184628,0.000030858693,0.00077309494,0.00001988385,0.00015985356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026532472,0.000058330803,0.00009307977,0.00012288972,0.0015141119,0.00021813234,0.00014173436,0.00016443944,0.0000026423581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033619915,0.00028911783,0.025618017,0.000005384,0.00016235575,0.0000291394,0.010304216,0.0017035089,0.0003859428,0.95903933,0.0018168386,0.00030997943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003375799,0.0015769649,0.5759267,0.0005573709,0.00011838352,0.0016925941,0.07768872,0.004658049,0.012851922,0.11755521,0.20324787,0.0007504118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00127034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012005183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84148407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048194037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022606922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084964497","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2013.0062","title":"Rwanda's New Intellectual Property Law and Compulsory Licensing for Export Under the WTO: Not Quite a Panacea","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Panacea (medicine); TRIPS architecture; International trade; Order (exchange); Business; TRIPS Agreement; International trade law; Access to medicines; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.1383288975416506,"score_gpt":0.30431759133223574,"score_spread":0.16598869379058515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084964497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81265795,0.0024938716,0.007838245,0.047704443,0.0009743364,0.0005151636,0.00010033654,0.000011416774,0.12770423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899338,0.00014154254,0.00041363022,0.008254955,0.00037653284,0.0000056322515,0.0000019701358,0.0000072238345,0.0008647367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991384,0.00001782087,0.00050734886,0.00014728955,0.000040004943,0.00014910556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900657,0.00032011396,0.0003473543,0.000065060005,0.00011935417,0.00014153603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024234458,0.000120744706,0.00032575324,0.000063171115,0.00013611515,0.00020431662,0.0001895659,0.000029588173,0.00019679713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021043017,0.00007618307,0.00008702118,0.00003436188,0.00025705723,0.0002842141,0.0000643782,0.00016929347,0.00002267009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001210222,0.000047080335,0.0003258056,0.000004749093,0.0002465932,7.647123e-7,0.002739894,0.000059569917,0.00010194211,0.9876652,0.0077637522,0.0009236239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015705865,0.00039260424,0.002798374,0.000035130302,0.000021105592,0.000107982894,0.0018706401,0.0155242095,0.00050210126,0.13649032,0.8404239,0.0002630466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003578369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084866086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8511749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045415225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024745434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31066555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584914341","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2017.0185","title":"The High Court of Ghana Declines to Enforce an ECOWAS Court Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; High Court; International court; European court of justice; Court decision; Economic Justice; Court of record; Law of the case; European Union law; Original jurisdiction; International law; Business; Jurisdiction; Public international law; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.06274304980585421,"score_gpt":0.3614838616618693,"score_spread":0.2987408118560151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584914341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88785493,0.00005242411,0.00024304177,0.012472567,0.0009688864,0.00009857813,0.00002218798,0.0000037958841,0.098283604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388134,0.00003086611,0.0003614374,0.00022958948,0.0006385508,0.000002749184,0.0000014281851,0.000002934707,0.0048510865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873996,0.000080418606,0.00035633513,0.00009346368,0.0006043437,0.00012548584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979843,0.00016340494,0.00058105506,0.00011428471,0.0010212634,0.00013567544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061260385,0.000084349216,0.00018810498,0.000049299215,0.001033634,0.000279148,0.0008590674,0.000023831937,0.00011441735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048124315,0.00005333909,0.00006919152,0.000016719856,0.00060366874,0.00041838543,0.0000592612,0.00010202671,0.0000063661196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001403185,0.000052495303,0.00042755168,7.041332e-7,0.0001057841,0.000004660158,0.003762251,0.000029564566,0.00005104974,0.994448,0.0007672737,0.00021036781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011605406,0.0009469709,0.032791078,0.00014857996,0.000056918994,0.00002602276,0.008669093,0.00025080307,0.0021842895,0.4097001,0.5437634,0.00030224072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00115042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061005983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5847479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006149277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009418495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79499805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799626375","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2018.0227","title":"Ghana and the Paradoxical Situation of Its Asylum-Seekers: Selected Grounds for Alleged Persecution in a Supposed Democratic Country","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Refugee; Democracy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026396213390241768,"score_gpt":0.309079940032237,"score_spread":0.2826837266419952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799626375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878182,0.00027986759,0.003983812,0.0022659057,0.00019289613,0.0002854608,0.00001283871,0.000004082968,0.0051569394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898887,0.00010783692,0.00029526083,0.00012604271,0.00027651506,0.000009818902,0.000009864449,0.000002413251,0.00018338146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987951,0.00027446268,0.0004055318,0.00009577822,0.0003274201,0.000101741585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981108,0.00035163047,0.0003479902,0.000032852673,0.0011099156,0.000046830446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008486218,0.00007875725,0.0002120538,0.000088498186,0.00022017579,0.00006808936,0.00013258337,0.000046689856,0.000036809408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021193472,0.000053431144,0.00004421482,0.00019383749,0.000617064,0.0004085497,0.000009251915,0.0001006148,5.984972e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011336372,0.00009320119,0.0010114211,0.0000068299387,0.00010411042,5.587408e-7,0.085135035,0.000007070638,0.00172538,0.90976596,0.0007901662,0.00022663896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02720309,0.0067047225,0.08088301,0.0008905063,0.00047062585,0.00015185824,0.49210966,0.10090706,0.013609461,0.20035893,0.075563945,0.0011471421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045416964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012871326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70940703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007042523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001237907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71825016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886246722","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2018.0235","title":"Post-Paris Climate Agreement UNFCCC COP-21: Perspectives on International Environmental Governance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Corporate governance; International community; Environmental governance; Negotiation; Environmental law; Business; Normative; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.05368540676457098,"score_gpt":0.26229405750708323,"score_spread":0.20860865074251225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886246722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79706335,0.0009158521,0.00011110435,0.0052878037,0.0011465155,0.00007814925,0.0011683485,0.000005829343,0.19422306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954518,0.0019908934,0.00031577505,0.0009123242,0.0007452884,0.0000040593773,0.000013722241,0.000008032827,0.0005580797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888897,0.0000151382455,0.00058326335,0.0002368403,0.00009287132,0.00018289614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998881,0.000064510314,0.00076778844,0.000100514946,0.000093971496,0.00009224647],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025113058,0.00015349366,0.0003131399,0.00011803947,0.000118321885,0.00009971292,0.00032406615,0.000037096677,0.0017943586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016925662,0.00015210065,0.0001155774,0.000040093408,0.0002901841,0.00035682603,0.0001026629,0.000154798,0.0003336871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046455013,0.00030633784,0.016596617,0.000002876491,0.00033576458,0.000010281659,0.0075070807,0.000022942795,0.00011987522,0.97324765,0.0011434305,0.00024258027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005991684,0.004309703,0.21765709,0.00021149039,0.000047979076,0.00043379804,0.042383853,0.004276236,0.002848872,0.04292653,0.67759854,0.0013142005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007891218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045131026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93032116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027069025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000849729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964325072","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2019.0281","title":"The Seychelles–Somaliland Prisoner Transfer Agreement: A Case of Implicit Recognition?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03739495447422581,"score_gpt":0.31161181187669235,"score_spread":0.27421685740246654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964325072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8478119,0.000109257526,0.0000837423,0.0010439387,0.00029661742,0.00009512508,0.00002271441,0.000002101963,0.15053461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944975,0.000046055662,0.00007577691,0.00010359208,0.00019947586,0.0000023858056,0.0000019042802,0.0000024419141,0.005070866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900216,0.0001117887,0.00034672327,0.00008213736,0.00035161775,0.00010557129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874276,0.00028041186,0.00019158676,0.00004673383,0.00067647255,0.000062037216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041519458,0.00007268279,0.00016083434,0.000050452407,0.00026600325,0.000073661824,0.00021623622,0.00002538884,0.00049049314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007721583,0.000045093475,0.000089467496,0.000039747138,0.0003033958,0.00020784809,0.000015997182,0.000116690004,0.000017301798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013987927,0.00005515052,0.00046609895,0.0000021107396,0.00017433529,0.000030126645,0.0070483955,0.000004704648,0.0001617117,0.9915388,0.00013331529,0.00024535155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035211302,0.0010898286,0.004176491,0.00024893024,0.00013126119,0.0012390696,0.028167762,0.00018544876,0.0037853469,0.57598555,0.3810017,0.00046745865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003612337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018123691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41555327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037852536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058225713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5370556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046978994","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2020.0323","title":"What Weight (If Any) Should Be Attached to Children's Wishes and Views in Child Relocation Disputes? Lessons from Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Agency (philosophy); Best interests; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law; Family law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.08598854467025008,"score_gpt":0.3488582449759353,"score_spread":0.26286970030568524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046978994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78938395,0.00251105,0.00012081346,0.1920609,0.00058363215,0.00019507788,0.00007586793,0.000007955407,0.015060775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552155,0.00021932476,0.00035426876,0.00343114,0.00038502776,0.0000058037836,0.000010143131,0.0000049082428,0.00006784767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853754,0.0002018744,0.0003478081,0.00019343781,0.0005704042,0.00014892488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990949,0.00019006466,0.0002416157,0.000055538465,0.00015139219,0.00026648492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022702973,0.00011635711,0.0002753125,0.000052169693,0.00021224588,0.00018693335,0.00036623547,0.00002909987,0.00016428625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080466314,0.00010114339,0.000034830005,0.0002364505,0.00018892421,0.00063499395,0.00009913133,0.0002765249,0.0000012432323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004755078,0.00021428191,0.15802172,0.0000060445614,0.000404964,0.000095288604,0.58527297,0.00048468044,0.000100869496,0.24139626,0.010836283,0.002691115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009489815,0.00023222298,0.13920332,0.00013839887,0.00003904144,0.0000129202435,0.057373364,0.00020739868,0.00021724372,0.0019530082,0.7993219,0.00035221758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12126931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30097046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7884856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017129145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015549587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8845822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105536423","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2020.0343","title":"Federalism and Money: An Examination of the Taxation Powers in the Federal Systems of Nigeria and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Independence (probability theory); Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Ethnic group; Centralized government; Power (physics); Central government; Political science; Public economics; Economic policy; Economics; Business; Public administration; Local government; Law; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.03528916635185559,"score_gpt":0.28001862628195534,"score_spread":0.24472945993009976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105536423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786076,0.0001592872,0.000052337124,0.0042518447,0.00010227977,0.00006503904,0.00002192913,5.9597056e-7,0.016739072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947745,0.00002507348,0.000028456478,0.00036304854,0.00007217018,8.4270613e-7,0.0000010518094,8.448917e-7,0.00003109178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913156,0.00026092245,0.00020926558,0.000047974212,0.00029963575,0.000050638213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991857,0.00016187521,0.00038440572,0.000021019083,0.00020015377,0.00004688153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025726008,0.000043109278,0.00012150651,0.000016170416,0.0001293263,0.00004023096,0.00012122363,0.000013166695,0.000004006726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048958023,0.000026780828,0.000013973787,0.00005868609,0.00050482084,0.00014687868,0.0000141895725,0.00006868868,1.5195535e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024944982,0.00001468872,0.017145105,0.0000040824757,0.000023147903,0.000001514765,0.016072363,0.000071132876,0.00012924861,0.96635467,0.00010531265,0.000053770964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011477006,0.00052780943,0.6312034,0.00014969519,0.000037188034,0.00007049142,0.30737144,0.0009552081,0.00026456374,0.0021832956,0.055858605,0.0002305834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14921433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13763326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003209467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028543905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87810266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130952997","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2020.0335","title":"Dispute Settlement under the African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement: A Preliminary Assessment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; Political science; Dispute mechanism; International trade; Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04871272041161431,"score_gpt":0.3065179129569898,"score_spread":0.2578051925453755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130952997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074417256,0.00031319336,0.0040006842,0.7760084,0.00056687667,0.0003604102,0.00013065326,0.000024104971,0.14417839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962672,0.000039122544,0.00049711094,0.0026007516,0.00038017798,0.0000044745284,0.0000067657593,0.000005062563,0.00019936005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845207,0.00020774089,0.00036399288,0.00013152383,0.00069819967,0.0001464991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999045,0.0001931845,0.00035707466,0.00007126291,0.00016009933,0.00017338592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027925996,0.00011331526,0.0001924191,0.000034371304,0.00031423217,0.0001516207,0.0005689096,0.000019220397,0.00050851353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020271465,0.000078616074,0.000076516524,0.00020163391,0.00045522707,0.00027766524,0.00009947759,0.00019495966,0.0000036891195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009600467,0.00012344548,0.002092519,0.0000019731579,0.00025502552,0.000013168452,0.01852854,0.000117484204,0.00016497585,0.9693714,0.009122271,0.00011323369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021879373,0.0008538841,0.08159545,0.00006504428,0.00013338694,0.000037553375,0.11408454,0.0008000029,0.00041439742,0.0076418454,0.79186803,0.00031790108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066032524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022648802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010469445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010047986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55678666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214872297","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2022.0396","title":"Surrogacy Legislation and Kenya's ART Bill 2019: Reproductive Uhuru (Freedom) A Myth or a Reality for Infertile Citizens?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CReATe Fertility Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Kenya; Law; Commission; Political science","score_opus":0.0875236393058144,"score_gpt":0.34993903769688095,"score_spread":0.26241539839106653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214872297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9184025,0.0014700093,0.0012466371,0.06112549,0.0007602259,0.00097417115,0.00018247563,0.000047999976,0.01579047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995495,0.00010164321,0.0019107604,0.00040023052,0.0003150152,0.00004652535,0.000022118802,0.000006619823,0.0017020946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987437,0.000083476385,0.00043001788,0.00028257616,0.00031761208,0.00014258736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841684,0.00020833287,0.00043729367,0.00014972486,0.00069479394,0.000093025585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061327306,0.00012109614,0.0003745825,0.00016660838,0.00019286573,0.000028154993,0.00010673273,0.000026096692,0.00006531709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002996207,0.00007852541,0.00006937028,0.00015511108,0.00024902783,0.00020376626,0.0000919006,0.00027656148,9.582928e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.053693317,0.002683168,0.056920674,0.00019019486,0.002184566,0.00025619328,0.013135353,0.00038618944,0.007776474,0.65348214,0.19597875,0.013312961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069177686,0.009943078,0.081669606,0.00013159889,0.00018151707,0.0026814707,0.010670674,0.00054123095,0.0027885938,0.06950227,0.8146027,0.00036953727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006141478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017641261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6186239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107990374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001326913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32021734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4228998464","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2022.0409","title":"Using the Right to Health to Advance Equitable Universal Health Coverage in Uganda's National Health Insurance Scheme Bill","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Equity (law); National health insurance; Health insurance; Government (linguistics); Health policy; Health equity; Health care; Economic growth; Business; Public administration; Political science; Law; Environmental health; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.0763611316225752,"score_gpt":0.38084200493205617,"score_spread":0.304480873309481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4228998464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68918145,0.0014943164,0.008911443,0.26865247,0.001511266,0.0009494555,0.0002611869,0.000018189628,0.02902025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871268,0.0000684403,0.002811628,0.009317636,0.00012231128,0.000005659401,0.000002567661,0.0000033558574,0.00054155965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979242,0.00038086146,0.00042820256,0.00014511104,0.0008447007,0.0002769121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897325,0.000114460934,0.00037915626,0.0000430294,0.00026085594,0.00022923217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017418714,0.00008579516,0.00025370799,0.00016207038,0.0012110468,0.00006922854,0.000334299,0.000007852633,0.00016093452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016194947,0.000057045152,0.00003438309,0.00036536544,0.000100416044,0.00022980646,0.00011449556,0.00021096971,0.0000020175407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023314112,0.0002060044,0.0041244985,0.0000050962203,0.000054547447,0.000011614863,0.10703045,0.010429656,0.000023795788,0.8689777,0.00796167,0.0009418072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007509369,0.0005842515,0.008870435,0.00009398463,5.159876e-7,0.000026537406,0.022004236,0.00018307066,0.000010772813,0.013475826,0.9538432,0.00015628463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030852433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061759404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014917195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016566307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93145156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310043585","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2022.0422","title":"Administration of Value Added Tax (Goods and Services Tax) and Fiscal Federalism in Nigeria: Lessons from Australia, Canada, the USA, India and Ethiopia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Constitution; Fiscal federalism; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Administration (probate law); Goods and services; Commerce Clause; Government (linguistics); Economic policy; Consumption tax; Indirect tax; Political science; Development economics; Public economics; Tax reform; Law; Economy; Market economy; Decentralization; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05590872636034322,"score_gpt":0.2753374059294553,"score_spread":0.2194286795691121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310043585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99101704,0.00042607225,0.0000072802527,0.004983649,0.00013860063,0.00005114919,0.00061839237,4.7321262e-7,0.0027573626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999248,0.000041753883,0.00007020888,0.00041953518,0.00006694239,0.0000047434037,0.000007634242,0.0000028203192,0.00013833365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922013,0.000048355352,0.00044884416,0.00013701341,0.00005623851,0.00008939299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999279,0.00014136823,0.0004562353,0.000044532608,0.000019780535,0.00005905543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025371616,0.00008844373,0.00027918446,0.00006715283,0.00012368156,0.000065837514,0.00013153623,0.000026617066,0.000069525675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000745139,0.00007900166,0.00002288488,0.00004755426,0.00013421552,0.00014749772,0.00007846384,0.0002093003,3.610103e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024402549,0.00006630067,0.351704,0.000014963159,0.00021127888,0.000014189947,0.0076410193,0.000077566154,0.000087942244,0.63940006,0.00045421268,0.00008442736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076961674,0.00019501726,0.90773624,0.000019217112,0.000008064347,0.00006288645,0.0034289218,0.0007374745,0.000110821115,0.07899873,0.007806838,0.0001261643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102859154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24911548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5604013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004830071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003340368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.903115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391839798","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2023.0462","title":"Universal Jurisdiction, Jus Cogens, and Suppression Conventions in the Aftermath of Lockerbie","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04008673615998745,"score_gpt":0.3224279365780666,"score_spread":0.2823412004180792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391839798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96843827,0.00007685888,0.00003539424,0.0024519751,0.00024543115,0.000055754514,0.000023021013,0.0000036085619,0.028669676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860173,0.00008426759,0.000034434488,0.00007064835,0.00011266493,0.0000014585545,0.0000056592903,0.0000014006716,0.001087743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991802,0.00013649923,0.00022358746,0.000059473445,0.0003273037,0.00007291248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992982,0.0001926701,0.00017786477,0.000028615894,0.00026665183,0.000035998055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037134983,0.00004891546,0.00011171858,0.00012037096,0.00017124155,0.000039843315,0.00017990277,0.00002025828,0.000063017156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010179473,0.00003275692,0.000040540202,0.000087053,0.0003746784,0.00021105973,0.00002407087,0.00009557095,0.0000029086484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053452874,0.00004098657,0.0013323297,0.0000019433435,0.000038668713,0.00001672411,0.014844814,0.00001160141,0.00009654341,0.98276424,0.0007642714,0.000034420496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022528823,0.00044787364,0.16564082,0.00032839066,0.00007709213,0.00011601707,0.050612796,0.0006253186,0.00053413823,0.46838638,0.31071228,0.00026600322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025701057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005956092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5143779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026540614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003793423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13805182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391857931","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2023.0465","title":"Warnings From the West: Identification and Expert Evidence as Causes of Wrongful Convictions and the Implications for South Africa (Part 1)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1417694052860796,"score_gpt":0.38582829555047266,"score_spread":0.24405889026439306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391857931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94663304,0.0028191407,0.0029959336,0.04034581,0.001386222,0.00035936458,0.00014897225,0.000022247792,0.005289242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979217,0.00029885088,0.000050372186,0.00041432396,0.00017543886,0.00005843047,0.000005128338,0.0000042040647,0.0010715695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991213,0.00014575788,0.00038611394,0.00014835634,0.000114793904,0.00008366266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771994,0.0013462624,0.00044599816,0.000118707605,0.0003218189,0.00004724611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042198156,0.000081033926,0.00017931382,0.00007206121,0.00020260773,0.00005289173,0.00017338007,0.00003194095,0.000142966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001004882,0.00004836216,0.000060021546,0.00013885021,0.0008095726,0.00012450975,0.00003533365,0.00011765367,0.000014358842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017235973,0.00010999358,0.010016285,0.0000041684157,0.0009886706,0.0000017477037,0.1729388,0.0000120969735,0.0030357053,0.76690227,0.040740896,0.0035257586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038148072,0.00054090674,0.5770124,0.00011953877,0.00018418492,0.00031223975,0.07695443,0.00035780147,0.0003213438,0.06486931,0.27529192,0.00022108435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007883456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038817107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.702033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000988754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000141665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2982904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404460673","doi":"10.3366/ajicl.2024.0500","title":"Perspectives in Dialogue: Debating the GCR’s Impact on the International Refugee Protection Regime","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.07045203843066193,"score_gpt":0.35064269596060726,"score_spread":0.2801906575299453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404460673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78581196,0.00032995048,0.00014330866,0.039806064,0.0011695777,0.00019825426,0.000014624173,0.000015288719,0.17251097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995969,0.000042231542,0.000030348983,0.0002346682,0.0010635465,0.000013387476,0.0000015121483,0.000004690257,0.002640631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857086,0.00023646938,0.00029417788,0.00013951329,0.0006309449,0.00012805182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987469,0.00059106917,0.0001841862,0.000058130656,0.00037615228,0.00004361566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001000561,0.00010906432,0.00013157696,0.00014425887,0.00034504227,0.00041312273,0.0005124859,0.0000312673,0.00033221286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008823701,0.000052833686,0.0001257878,0.00010956152,0.00041445802,0.0003827952,0.000037542333,0.00040779245,0.000016797398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012160573,0.000046094705,0.00008029967,8.2664536e-7,0.0001586402,0.00001552098,0.022973139,0.00008299857,0.00007914115,0.9756068,0.00058489287,0.00025002848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055794104,0.0005022398,0.009099561,0.00047648358,0.00003195737,0.00012740074,0.029932726,0.0029647236,0.00034747185,0.7557294,0.19994897,0.0002811471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006581059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012472352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21987744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003535213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013280002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3983752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}