{"meta":{"query_hash":"38f2183585a3","filters":{"venue":"Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/38f2183585a3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Agora+International+Journal+of+Juridical+Sciences"},"results":[{"id":"W1532334626","doi":"10.15837/aijjs.v8i2.1187","title":"CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE FIRST PRELIMINARY RULING OF THE HIGH COURT OF CASSATION AND JUSTICE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Preliminary ruling; Accountability","score_opus":0.02670280495105994,"score_gpt":0.3160015155987504,"score_spread":0.28929871064769047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532334626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170656,0.00016716724,0.0011056262,0.074768916,0.0015352714,0.000082810315,0.0000032568398,0.000004058057,0.005267273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862516,0.00016480249,0.00043347085,0.00028484515,0.0004662349,7.2028934e-7,1.3851415e-7,0.0000016416772,0.000023002558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983164,0.00015344298,0.000371976,0.0000768689,0.00099269,0.000088643625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978119,0.0010393467,0.000550664,0.000056168996,0.00049893453,0.000042973134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025938733,0.00004666212,0.00010615999,0.00006535534,0.0006346895,0.00009097498,0.00038839623,0.000038147435,0.00004444436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018062056,0.000026189633,0.00006941201,0.00015166211,0.0010605666,0.0002919215,0.0000664894,0.000115728784,3.7468408e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097607095,0.00016001651,0.031447932,0.000025889542,0.00011880844,0.0000046819796,0.015997117,0.0026488886,0.0013994727,0.9295544,0.0029648968,0.015580284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023895963,0.0016371487,0.57667744,0.0013823871,0.0007052985,0.00029829907,0.017630981,0.014661439,0.008355987,0.15500118,0.22077303,0.00048724824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063227164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033071934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77455324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031498028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021945674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4881583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567333668","doi":"10.15837/aijjs.v7i4.852","title":"THE RIGHT TO A TRIAL WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME: A GENERAL GUARANTEE OF THE RIGHT TO A PENAL EQUITY TRIAL","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Legislation; Right to a fair trial; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Actuarial science; Economics; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.037693703835414843,"score_gpt":0.3613902875044541,"score_spread":0.3236965836690393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567333668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94699234,0.000053043375,0.00044813214,0.038167667,0.0037643306,0.00089087314,0.00001308495,0.000010779975,0.009659735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910604,0.00005677587,0.0015993447,0.001354449,0.0038967843,0.000029525352,7.461793e-7,0.000007791644,0.0019941956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952564,0.0006306306,0.0007849865,0.00022987885,0.0027434707,0.00035461655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977174,0.00051184464,0.0006228505,0.00016312732,0.00074953056,0.0002352473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060595744,0.00012415633,0.0002214949,0.0001375945,0.0009865339,0.00066668267,0.0027868492,0.000060902974,0.0006000251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00428268,0.00006141702,0.00022195707,0.00060480536,0.00080387865,0.0007039955,0.00043310272,0.00029482314,0.00016398139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.21592434,0.0026540034,0.0002511493,0.00002955835,0.0006596313,0.00020877727,0.023361057,0.001201773,0.026304608,0.329541,0.2897439,0.11012021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08514488,0.015126503,0.0024487395,0.0009990558,0.00045168312,0.0002759553,0.00809111,0.0020987708,0.015425326,0.08619564,0.7825061,0.0012362337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017691503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062702206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4927622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015188706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010046241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7587721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118069277","doi":"10.15837/aijjs.v19i2.7360","title":"LEGALIZING MEDICAL CANNABIS AND AVOIDING ILLICIT MARKETS IN NIGERIA: A TRIPARTITE CASE STUDY ANALYSIS TOWARDS ACHIEVING AN EFFECTIVE MARKET MODEL","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Cannabis; Enforcement; Law enforcement; Market failure; Product (mathematics); Economic model; Emerging markets","score_opus":0.024637857681224982,"score_gpt":0.3795923741361299,"score_spread":0.3549545164549049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118069277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982253,0.0015262527,0.0023181858,0.0072109173,0.0016359745,0.0004317824,0.000029432982,0.00001408714,0.004580356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996931,0.001361463,0.0001966847,0.0005479813,0.0005264834,0.000019656194,6.711066e-7,0.000011201873,0.00040483166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900385,0.002496892,0.0016997118,0.0008521485,0.0041483194,0.0007643867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995878,0.0014729195,0.0011381573,0.00019593426,0.0006614438,0.0006535419],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018372435,0.00041694104,0.0011017362,0.0016769075,0.0012284287,0.0011886284,0.0017900442,0.00029048382,0.00036796276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050540497,0.0003593864,0.00042842436,0.003202795,0.0017498751,0.0026500248,0.000497872,0.0012386347,7.275388e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021372829,0.0057714707,0.5332236,0.00010014233,0.0053030844,0.017108764,0.16298255,0.0048406897,0.00019113962,0.0050071953,0.0025731316,0.2607609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007118189,0.002411006,0.3182654,0.0022868053,0.002344317,0.001317263,0.32202163,0.33253247,0.00019790547,0.0044054296,0.005269144,0.001830437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029875789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071402974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3276918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008412653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026157184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}