{"meta":{"query_hash":"4c36ea93806d","filters":{"venue":"Agricultural Economics"},"cohort_total":66,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"exported":66,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4c36ea93806d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Agricultural+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1501327737","doi":"10.1111/agec.12323","title":"Quota prices as indicators of comparative advantage in supply‐managed industries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative advantage; Economics; Production (economics); Product (mathematics); Industrial organization; Partial equilibrium; Supply and demand; Microeconomics; Business; General equilibrium theory; International trade","score_opus":0.015717273943948833,"score_gpt":0.22332991759464113,"score_spread":0.2076126436506923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501327737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873658,0.00009893155,9.3815515e-8,0.0031559607,0.00011377807,0.00032497325,0.0001821607,0.00003542658,0.00872287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980991,0.0005715855,0.000026633466,0.00011594402,0.00017937466,0.000026657506,0.000086587024,0.0000013134643,0.0008928339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846435,0.000049912232,0.0005967122,0.00040315455,0.00006821931,0.0004176366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990306,0.00027317376,0.0004177173,0.00007862511,0.000044722154,0.00015520037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015239845,0.00027882354,0.00048841705,0.000045876488,0.000099456716,0.000051145915,0.00047279065,0.0001867482,0.00042807977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029320983,0.00008051451,0.00013056833,0.00042825186,0.00014584095,0.00056498934,0.00014673409,0.00014381859,0.00014999398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026350506,0.0006380866,0.34056988,0.000046931127,0.00032541348,0.000012597798,0.002666729,0.000092049035,0.2542886,0.15109977,0.009530175,0.24046622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041387844,0.00021659052,0.95613456,0.00005063002,0.00001149137,0.000010243879,0.0029602672,0.0000022773077,0.018249955,0.0009015428,0.020636206,0.0004123848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006785104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00289835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61556464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013366579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019665782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46871734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954813849","doi":"10.1111/agec.12196","title":"The effects of fair trade on coffee growers: a framework and analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Coquitlam College","funders":"","keywords":"Fair trade; Economics; Production (economics); Welfare; Consumer welfare; Agricultural economics; Business; International trade; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.011456456894175019,"score_gpt":0.2166809350717009,"score_spread":0.20522447817752587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954813849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941543,0.0001700006,0.0000050815943,0.0021752876,0.0002863782,0.00021087847,0.000003199321,0.000030239304,0.0029646505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991063,0.000063870975,0.000018102368,0.00042892096,0.00032678497,0.0000053402505,0.000012822367,0.0000049807695,0.00003286508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934644,0.000014889998,0.00019034419,0.00016826985,0.00006935223,0.00021069004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940026,0.00022049755,0.00015952757,0.00013425051,0.00005475687,0.000030710384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001875912,0.00013729038,0.00024369385,0.000046038538,0.00015179002,0.00024384841,0.00016235972,0.00008191282,0.0000016181071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004174693,0.00007764627,0.00014854614,0.0003360942,0.00009806858,0.00040828163,0.00005365575,0.00010206999,0.0000068777704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031412454,0.00051576324,0.2746455,0.0007351624,0.0028278288,0.000011189155,0.0067204093,0.0017347132,0.00005099718,0.6836887,0.015360208,0.013395389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006190306,0.00009713748,0.93461984,0.00003145289,0.00081067206,6.913048e-7,0.01878066,0.00035123946,0.000040281328,0.038096055,0.0062046642,0.0003482811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036533285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011540415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65997434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007931128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011009211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3166323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972019741","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00033.x","title":"Agricultural taxation in developing countries: a survey of issues and policy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Agriculture; Developing country; Revenue; Context (archaeology); Tax revenue; Economics; Public economics; Tax policy; Agricultural policy; Business; Economic policy; Agricultural economics; Economic growth; Tax reform; Finance","score_opus":0.02220441961617818,"score_gpt":0.27847544391242546,"score_spread":0.25627102429624726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972019741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993085,0.00014134104,0.000016298702,0.0039841435,0.0000663961,0.0001446885,0.000010065076,0.00001258479,0.002539456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847406,0.014431249,0.00008425451,0.0001484235,0.00008178238,0.0000042226206,0.00003946596,0.0000021302935,0.0004678535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993254,0.00005982211,0.00022729202,0.00012917428,0.00007794727,0.00018038813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956965,0.00005970247,0.00021129206,0.000037096834,0.000086185384,0.000036069316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002462486,0.00007467832,0.00013855843,0.000029630512,0.000101251615,0.000057139056,0.00007916645,0.0000704149,0.000012266373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019000022,0.000053968535,0.000016142065,0.00030722196,0.00006997071,0.0004558421,0.000021527065,0.000030254609,0.0000065991408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023026041,0.000025811592,0.76119995,0.00001465438,0.000012009886,6.062555e-7,0.00809205,0.00024774947,0.000042208474,0.22747365,0.0009512281,0.0019170385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013179787,0.000010699779,0.98261636,0.000018365141,0.0000018843507,9.614776e-7,0.0016589452,0.000017184559,0.00010757171,0.00029784077,0.015037902,0.00010048316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0385935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055663217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2271758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028520636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008306593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9678086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972477706","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00363.x","title":"Fractional integration in agricultural futures price volatilities revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Economics; Leverage (statistics); Econometrics; Heteroscedasticity; Financial economics; Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.012965744163621812,"score_gpt":0.20114962576753068,"score_spread":0.18818388160390886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972477706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362784,0.0005648668,0.00019792585,0.0018624623,0.00035330793,0.00030063078,0.00013308457,0.000058781203,0.060250543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968268,0.00025005089,0.0005455092,0.00031171265,0.00027233167,0.000016155998,0.00033373042,0.000008043938,0.0014356243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815714,0.000025038806,0.00090756937,0.00052346895,0.00003178425,0.00035497668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999128,0.000072508585,0.00041101463,0.00022681638,0.00006391024,0.00009775953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037873088,0.00027142992,0.00047173063,0.0001531649,0.00014451548,0.00018520885,0.00024040723,0.00019232623,0.0003810998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001123313,0.00022268896,0.00018174689,0.00028963215,0.00003054984,0.0008841555,0.000033502438,0.00031690922,0.0000781975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010789888,0.0003423094,0.10988893,0.000041069274,0.000071736045,0.0000030053639,0.0013937568,0.00049368624,0.0002848593,0.8751817,0.005678153,0.006512923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037582798,0.00005780057,0.9325224,0.00002089072,0.0000034891418,0.000009965779,0.0005108082,0.015478975,0.000021627066,0.046863478,0.003763299,0.00037140775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016826861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022349697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8283182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003827938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012862994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90809923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974564431","doi":"10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.001","title":"Current issues in the economics of agriculture, food, and resources: reshaping agriculture's contributions to society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Economics; Agricultural economics; Food systems; Natural resource economics; Current (fluid); Food security; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.016428503090757836,"score_gpt":0.2351350685702321,"score_spread":0.21870656547947426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974564431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755817,0.0020960523,0.0000011739287,0.020209273,0.00017559541,0.00079906156,0.00062205055,0.000043183383,0.00047189332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396545,0.0035180803,0.00015869469,0.0010928531,0.00083996746,0.0000910651,0.00027516327,0.0000027934589,0.000055957305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977894,0.0000747507,0.0008005952,0.0006120809,0.000095499854,0.00062771706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988874,0.00021788076,0.0003621878,0.00013604487,0.00015538797,0.00024105885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040578324,0.0004357693,0.0005673864,0.000025309186,0.00038224505,0.00025512953,0.0006976023,0.00023047814,0.000015853037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057546902,0.00014331688,0.00034536963,0.0005034018,0.00013543572,0.000410511,0.0002240588,0.00036525636,0.000028128658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028576262,0.0021705807,0.011454284,0.00030602707,0.0008705573,0.000007048051,0.034392472,0.027491286,0.1781301,0.616018,0.0778546,0.051019296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001638816,0.0012119386,0.53673995,0.000249358,0.000105355095,0.0001405232,0.014836924,0.000033814224,0.008571074,0.011650269,0.42309678,0.001725241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00147413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008660465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60436773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027944322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002193797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58442926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977985440","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00404.x","title":"Who trades water allocations? Evidence of the characteristics of early adopters in the Goulburn–Murray Irrigation District, Australia 1998–1999**","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Australian Research Council; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Early adopter; Logit; Productivity; Value (mathematics); Agriculture; Water trading; Irrigation district; Economics; Agricultural economics; Irrigation; Business; Water conservation; Economic growth; Econometrics; Geography; Marketing","score_opus":0.018209155015083946,"score_gpt":0.1971744123807778,"score_spread":0.17896525736569385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977985440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988594,0.000028867162,0.00009665108,0.00049384957,0.000086867054,0.00022516957,0.0000060329835,0.000014115339,0.00018904707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996385,0.00009503054,0.00006933581,0.000023702465,0.000038088478,0.000006157655,0.000037565092,0.000003809872,0.00008779487],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993955,0.000022970999,0.0003190137,0.00008496435,0.00005632074,0.00012122451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972034,0.0000216811,0.000083342966,0.00014507833,0.000015623533,0.000013956139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009606898,0.00010208795,0.00012499018,0.000030047233,0.000032978536,0.000049976647,0.00026944853,0.00004196014,0.000004451305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005423816,0.000049441922,0.000058167654,0.00011310525,0.000029113491,0.00029176785,0.000013695534,0.00008110923,0.0000043238097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006909043,0.0001732969,0.059048716,0.00048342303,0.00016674635,0.0000020442124,0.025736766,0.88046086,0.01765668,0.005622834,0.0019498244,0.008629724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117027725,0.000042111562,0.9885445,0.00009254759,0.00003121327,0.0000013674565,0.00020280323,0.0059599024,0.0044909385,0.00010452291,0.00029397995,0.00011903258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046478202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022808981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044919114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016927413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2016183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991061614","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00575.x","title":"Short‐run and long‐run dynamics of farm land allocation: panel data evidence from Denmark<sup>1</sup>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Danish; Agriculture; Economics; Estimation; Agricultural economics; Econometrics; Capital (architecture); Agricultural land; Temperate climate; Natural resource economics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.07885542108199786,"score_gpt":0.22748869185044698,"score_spread":0.14863327076844912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991061614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99565256,0.0005958252,0.0000044641774,0.0012499733,0.00012155657,0.0003137394,0.00094078033,0.000042451877,0.0010786616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416107,0.002712222,0.00034153243,0.00014365838,0.0004566081,0.000013947277,0.00183007,0.0000030841588,0.00033780333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804056,0.00005741279,0.00064746366,0.00076026825,0.000084841005,0.00040944756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987667,0.00030901365,0.0002806625,0.00028654153,0.000109112516,0.00024795294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022441972,0.00036128686,0.00048234203,0.000015310228,0.00019778563,0.00012888087,0.0010820042,0.00023317117,0.00031312602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005140974,0.0001425898,0.00011660696,0.00016512306,0.00014962672,0.0008116771,0.0006053341,0.0001921563,0.00006644887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026989385,0.00041121375,0.5799237,0.000090380876,0.0006224749,0.000014113008,0.0027076937,0.0005412239,0.006430754,0.0062808776,0.0027991957,0.39990848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016242436,0.0001415831,0.9910502,0.00005973494,0.000085173546,0.000038796265,0.001277216,0.0042022304,0.00038841265,0.00058340287,0.0014596211,0.0005512049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006850197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017226499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41112652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092833325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016668911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003608996","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00139.x","title":"The political economy of farmland ownership regulations and land prices","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Economic rent; Economics; Instrumental variable; Ordinary least squares; Value (mathematics); Acre; Agricultural land; Variable (mathematics); Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Land tenure; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Geography; Agricultural science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00979913655567014,"score_gpt":0.17924070041703238,"score_spread":0.16944156386136225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003608996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592156,0.00020422832,1.9162353e-7,0.01680094,0.00006243059,0.00016616497,0.00005605884,0.00002337838,0.023471024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866396,0.00006504027,0.000034871176,0.00019726116,0.0005056511,0.0000128478505,0.00010796986,9.5257343e-7,0.0004114163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989886,0.000023349474,0.00037336323,0.00022708114,0.000029183899,0.000358382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992112,0.0003693712,0.0002000943,0.00005578579,0.000053222775,0.00011034715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103492406,0.00016332266,0.00020353118,0.0000070843594,0.00034084774,0.0001630887,0.00020557304,0.00009232952,0.000018723442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010714381,0.000045543697,0.00009886439,0.00008269788,0.00014813845,0.00020005013,0.00007252168,0.00008217809,0.000010923595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014712424,0.000032489534,0.029588137,0.000007939754,0.00003236367,2.4522342e-7,0.00002733794,0.000040469793,0.002885133,0.9617839,0.0015273143,0.004059985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016421892,0.00007264893,0.89375156,0.000005858311,0.000019217436,0.00002579803,0.00064173463,0.00010206536,0.0009329507,0.047520477,0.05651657,0.00024690293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011588669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003369144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91426337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042948053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007429189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26215598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006387614","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00223.x","title":"Transaction costs, strategic interaction, and farm restructuring","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Transaction cost; Business; Industrial organization; Vertical integration; Software deployment; Czech; Agriculture; Process (computing); Database transaction; Outcome (game theory); Organizational architecture; Strategic Choice; Microeconomics; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.019360171740765743,"score_gpt":0.2109857593471077,"score_spread":0.19162558760634196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006387614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98784244,0.000084092055,0.000001276784,0.0009912871,0.00031075487,0.00017520392,0.000026773836,0.00007487982,0.010493307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983554,0.00039010862,0.0000697511,0.00019094147,0.0006111213,0.0000050326266,0.00010678777,0.0000013660249,0.00026951544],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885994,0.000016838754,0.0003656909,0.00034561064,0.00003971994,0.0003722156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994332,0.0001228415,0.00016079162,0.000042285752,0.00004355811,0.00019728436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017268589,0.00021986432,0.0002096186,0.000014858307,0.00026651763,0.00017763932,0.00014976876,0.00013906053,0.00010942382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050134267,0.000080567115,0.00009423623,0.00011692286,0.000044219112,0.00032572888,0.000033896536,0.00018471557,0.00003580866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021855935,0.00012433318,0.0074439063,0.00003187949,0.00016674856,0.000010191537,0.0005689009,0.00027957952,0.29099223,0.088399574,0.00047217074,0.61129194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003740304,0.00023331556,0.95338637,0.000022400274,0.000032106374,0.0003078503,0.007691166,0.00010394984,0.008863294,0.0021836245,0.026030254,0.0007716668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010548555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008246197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94594246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017164186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043905134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46015716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022502738","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00557.x","title":"Measuring the cost of liquidity in agricultural futures markets: Conventional and Bayesian approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","keywords":"Futures contract; Market liquidity; Econometrics; Estimator; Bayesian probability; Economics; Futures market; Covariance; Financial economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05666833486824902,"score_gpt":0.18000617849663286,"score_spread":0.12333784362838385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022502738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953318,0.0004823146,0.0000012122345,0.00069680734,0.00014324866,0.0004612553,0.0000350288,0.000028438131,0.0028198578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892676,0.0004367232,0.00011642345,0.00003981726,0.00018586036,0.00004517492,0.00005484804,0.0000010932264,0.00019328813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985382,0.0001157333,0.00046531102,0.00039434523,0.00012312568,0.0003633185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993254,0.00016645118,0.00025148087,0.00006869546,0.00006694362,0.00012101268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029845114,0.00026251655,0.0003063776,0.000013272156,0.00027986802,0.000055163287,0.0004354861,0.00014970881,0.000113453156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003384636,0.00006905098,0.00015428882,0.00024797808,0.000230329,0.00036746069,0.00016420415,0.00022236754,0.0000075996973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001149448,0.001959782,0.51291585,0.00029137798,0.000572336,0.00002728616,0.012272287,0.0010527459,0.13998763,0.066940494,0.0050615547,0.25776917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017556762,0.00007565397,0.98715353,0.00002923049,0.00001664941,0.00004660155,0.0070213773,0.000060877792,0.004380752,0.00035143163,0.00043624997,0.0002520963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004525089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021426606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47423765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051226256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007928102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2815817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024535721","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00353.x","title":"Implications of high food prices for poverty in Pakistan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Food prices; Almost ideal demand system; Subsidy; Incentive; Agricultural economics; Food policy; Rural area; Rural poverty; Agriculture; Food security; Economic growth; Geography; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.025047153123225453,"score_gpt":0.21225317946036026,"score_spread":0.18720602633713482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024535721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760124,0.0006601858,0.00009915234,0.001636072,0.00024733553,0.0005297143,0.00088161783,0.00002755916,0.019905938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957412,0.0009750174,0.0023380646,0.00023121828,0.00011167561,0.00011309795,0.00014673972,0.000016213922,0.0003267797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981671,0.0000051424327,0.0010168675,0.0004665325,0.000011155716,0.00033317527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988337,0.00013738748,0.0006093615,0.00027671605,0.00005558961,0.00008724091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018736637,0.00021143415,0.0005877118,0.00013205092,0.00010771389,0.000028944365,0.00035419365,0.0001561641,0.000058000853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032270367,0.0001878086,0.00022180218,0.00017224588,0.000057718775,0.00045622725,0.000059671343,0.000105108185,0.00004583177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046661855,0.0002212497,0.03317385,0.000051120398,0.0001354155,3.2982658e-7,0.00040339105,0.00042553374,0.00012482263,0.9580073,0.0070923497,0.0003179988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012398089,0.00024414714,0.8771302,0.000009449479,0.000008103647,0.00001924937,0.0001690806,0.00004152288,0.00056093006,0.10774325,0.012389834,0.0004444362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020627519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058246445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.850264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018230455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022554505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7658613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038508384","doi":"10.1111/agec.12072","title":"Residual demand measures of market power of Russian wheat exporters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect competition; Economics; Market power; Price elasticity of demand; Competition (biology); Residual; Instrumental variable; Heteroscedasticity; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01635739447938146,"score_gpt":0.1688505875621962,"score_spread":0.15249319308281475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038508384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8566643,0.0011852648,0.000014710551,0.0009429265,0.0003640527,0.00037938554,0.00015699609,0.000025212035,0.14026718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996564,0.0007682466,0.00074330217,0.00011221231,0.000102629085,0.000036213114,0.00004180888,0.00002228892,0.0016093493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975544,0.000022198772,0.0014754062,0.0005073466,0.000034423105,0.00040621517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981905,0.000085373096,0.0010570233,0.00041375382,0.00008230419,0.00017105087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041257453,0.00031890208,0.00089187775,0.00016574672,0.000069148155,0.000073806616,0.00046651444,0.0002300604,0.0013183741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004729838,0.00026179804,0.00031816153,0.00013599411,0.0001308983,0.00081788044,0.00011351201,0.00015943077,0.0002289233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030124068,0.001063659,0.16494945,0.00047196395,0.0025858604,0.000005540785,0.0047217007,0.0005453649,0.007439532,0.54983026,0.26457343,0.0035120216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012238888,0.00033539737,0.95683223,0.000054635868,0.000036308298,0.000025637666,0.0014159468,0.00008598771,0.005084098,0.024299668,0.009704743,0.00090143236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003088646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007115855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009427315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020630236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051186636","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00409.x","title":"Exporting to new destinations and the effects of tariffs: the case of meat commodities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Liberalization; International economics; Probit model; Free trade; Economics; Estimation; International trade; Destinations; Probit; Business; Agricultural economics; Econometrics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.02513254420435885,"score_gpt":0.1902825911144324,"score_spread":0.16515004691007357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051186636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883054,0.0010389086,0.000061382794,0.004812864,0.00019217208,0.00035855372,0.000040547005,0.000010618881,0.005179564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830765,0.00030999782,0.0005842322,0.0004605103,0.00007864708,0.000008072695,0.0000058315,0.0000051994043,0.00023985338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989375,0.000013808077,0.00066830346,0.00019118139,0.000008690417,0.00018051904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988653,0.0003265149,0.00048296852,0.00022648527,0.000024261866,0.00007448403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025017202,0.00013639845,0.00040441658,0.00004588847,0.00014791133,0.000059409213,0.00022965085,0.00005580564,0.00001056534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019861819,0.000084970176,0.000119186254,0.00010373504,0.000114688715,0.00019989222,0.00005611867,0.00009374986,0.0000156067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019340241,0.00002828104,0.0019944098,0.000030241988,0.0000642257,0.0000032246746,0.0024574767,0.00086117256,0.0000334106,0.98994684,0.0017160262,0.0028453616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006320172,0.00079975266,0.35257024,0.00015615432,0.00018300058,0.0010269956,0.008784573,0.0033275506,0.0039344872,0.6120257,0.0096325725,0.0012388428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013913877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003807101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37792116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003844006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011581756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34649834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056499450","doi":"10.1111/agec.12021","title":"Challenges and policy options in the global bio‐economy: introduction and overview","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Economics; Agriculture; Volatility (finance); Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Natural resource economics; Economy; Macroeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02197063440898549,"score_gpt":0.2158772127263667,"score_spread":0.1939065783173812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056499450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83571917,0.0022329157,3.711952e-8,0.16001973,0.000035186422,0.0002828978,0.0000046841233,0.000012899014,0.0016924934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890699,0.009481828,0.000044837678,0.00090032903,0.00035858213,0.00007120697,0.000024326824,3.1690638e-7,0.000048712944],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992605,0.0000525357,0.00019022875,0.00028293565,0.000016910517,0.0001969152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975646,0.0000590528,0.000050671755,0.000046082692,0.00002735918,0.000060350867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017636688,0.00012048669,0.00013694282,0.000007812844,0.00012239412,0.00014416735,0.00012078796,0.00007439531,0.000040634357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017707081,0.000039157094,0.000030097995,0.00008693765,0.000075890704,0.00038536303,0.000073610274,0.000070986294,0.000019721525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004318861,0.000063285326,0.0075066877,0.000029395036,0.000018548162,3.3849426e-7,0.0006425374,0.0000051761285,0.00007162242,0.34427172,0.0006325219,0.64675385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066041786,0.00004304806,0.90911925,0.000002747789,0.0000027450383,0.0000328652,0.0047855526,0.000010652646,0.000004632691,0.025509797,0.060305595,0.000117064665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058509444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025762483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120469274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009365671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15967798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059470131","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00556.x","title":"The North American horticultural industry and the risk of plant invasion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Revenue; Monopolistic competition; Profit (economics); Competition (biology); Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Industrial organization; Agricultural economics; Finance; Ecology; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.01303739633804999,"score_gpt":0.17308885133426666,"score_spread":0.16005145499621667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059470131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981214,0.00003005487,1.2836179e-7,0.00025221478,0.000048971546,0.00013113249,0.000014815576,0.0000068182467,0.0013944848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892277,0.000848209,0.00004858095,0.000043478212,0.0000140680595,0.000013753899,0.0000027400479,0.0000018262882,0.00010454856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950325,0.000044943434,0.00016078865,0.00012373507,0.000029077888,0.0001382118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995859,0.000098158,0.00019547227,0.000082233324,0.000004948138,0.000033264292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011553026,0.00008799356,0.0001299425,0.0000025554557,0.0004306487,0.000010186814,0.00015890173,0.000038963542,0.00003182098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022659848,0.00003117546,0.000043533866,0.00005320051,0.0012372067,0.00008738501,0.00019816097,0.00019356354,0.00002514819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054768203,0.000013208157,0.9962895,4.3218188e-7,0.000026737678,3.2985983e-7,0.00090627425,0.0000150859805,0.000018328268,0.00029795125,0.00044847114,0.0019289459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016315843,0.00006533739,0.9967306,7.611383e-7,0.000045043947,0.00000913524,0.0023960378,0.000019983336,0.00010699975,0.000044633067,0.0003522947,0.00006597182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001500973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017170649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015669676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027046526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017629626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9581625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066621112","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00007.x","title":"The economics of coupled farm subsidies under costly and imperfect enforcement","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Subsidy; Public economics; Cheating; Economics; Microeconomics; Deterrence theory; Economic interventionism; Incentive; Agency (philosophy); Imperfect; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.010870769263397414,"score_gpt":0.17304821168550533,"score_spread":0.1621774424221079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066621112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93280905,0.0038953775,0.0000047088506,0.0010932286,0.00033543605,0.00040655388,0.00012661598,0.000033924345,0.06129509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96495,0.031066414,0.00011093114,0.00027813538,0.00016323608,0.000043049124,0.000058744354,0.000024386582,0.0033050799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775636,0.000016939264,0.0011573057,0.00055427355,0.000018600265,0.0004965003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863374,0.00021801468,0.0005621685,0.00038826055,0.000043468746,0.00015433719],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005033305,0.00035873186,0.00066592067,0.0000633718,0.00038510695,0.00022915695,0.0004331091,0.0001767851,0.00034428196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021317726,0.00025851163,0.0002493435,0.000091907714,0.00023139168,0.00038584362,0.0001056327,0.00019024237,0.0002212222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001442628,0.00009200992,0.0043596695,0.00004048939,0.00058993,5.8420386e-7,0.0005067372,0.002713514,0.00014421687,0.98342746,0.0011091323,0.006872014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060402052,0.0013295311,0.4167282,0.00006843355,0.0001779601,0.00015948985,0.004477618,0.0071070986,0.001995399,0.16797814,0.39047602,0.003461901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003607127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082295516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8154493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018280887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022578015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075750714","doi":"10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00013.x","title":"Yield and income risk‐efficiency analysis of alternative systems for rice production in the Guinea Savannah of Northern Ghana","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"","keywords":"Fertilizer; Agronomy; Cropping system; Cover crop; Sowing; Cropping; Mathematics; Crop; Environmental science; Biology; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.0222828308939257,"score_gpt":0.21674204777362782,"score_spread":0.19445921687970213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075750714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980024,0.0001430142,0.000006282722,0.001166295,0.000070531634,0.00040517363,0.000060466897,0.0000050774875,0.00014076602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994806,0.00020502252,0.0000240283,0.00003516401,0.00011229,0.000026457432,0.000037051628,3.681033e-7,0.000079039775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927765,0.00003058291,0.00034773664,0.00018142798,0.00005600832,0.000106611296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923545,0.0002533619,0.00034219626,0.00004793028,0.00010068201,0.000020389778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002881724,0.00008642795,0.00020089076,0.00002610633,0.0000641895,0.000022923685,0.00015681454,0.000037509886,0.0000062637905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010879964,0.000027078047,0.00008543511,0.0003615877,0.000031501833,0.0001342078,0.000021540927,0.000047083016,6.8573615e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026356324,0.0016277463,0.46110865,0.00025291517,0.001730282,4.3224279e-7,0.015885165,0.12573826,0.26661497,0.004490111,0.0009405766,0.12134731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014006748,0.00019895098,0.9842695,0.00001541553,0.0001262022,9.95264e-7,0.0066825263,0.0040108617,0.003941454,0.000028347831,0.00045551485,0.00013015486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016998219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008296724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5231609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003056257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033163585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46297666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087738861","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00269.x","title":"Differentiating the consumer benefits from labeling of GM food products","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Yield (engineering); Food products; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Food science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03203573920005104,"score_gpt":0.19948548032379332,"score_spread":0.16744974112374228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087738861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972429,0.0004818919,0.0000016554118,0.0014688614,0.00014160646,0.00025097272,0.00008036442,0.000027577848,0.00030414306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989259,0.00011463004,0.00046889335,0.000065110784,0.00028217616,0.000004623407,0.0000847023,0.0000013761816,0.000052568274],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998802,0.00003767413,0.0003629411,0.00030619075,0.00012347667,0.00036770786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990439,0.00047975333,0.00014681074,0.00009182676,0.00014916771,0.00008854986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002856376,0.00014898197,0.00018646846,0.000007065882,0.00019267408,0.0000702424,0.00042148022,0.00009400491,0.0001521975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114585455,0.000043447668,0.00007323026,0.00019008991,0.000081196384,0.00008236588,0.0001754523,0.00016431278,0.00004077533],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001787437,0.00007368035,0.010014724,0.0000066009466,0.000071067196,3.3412812e-7,0.0002016783,0.00006199556,0.91616756,0.0019130075,0.00013536107,0.07133613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010094416,0.00011522057,0.7864138,0.0000101700225,0.000014757748,0.000002613189,0.0007343587,0.00001751483,0.21164903,0.00029165682,0.0005020813,0.00014788326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040151543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020879041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031105566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007983206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17717445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088422577","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00227.x","title":"Regional trade agreements and trade in agri‐food products: evidence for the European Union from gravity modeling using disaggregated data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Gravity model of trade; European union; International trade; International economics; Openness to experience; Economics; Trade barrier; Trade diversion; Trade creation; Regional trade; Free trade; Economic integration; International free trade agreement","score_opus":0.30384079097226957,"score_gpt":0.2697382399669234,"score_spread":0.03410255100534615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088422577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868837,0.004280517,0.0018656012,0.0048958887,0.00044806092,0.00062121224,0.00077283685,0.000027433573,0.0002047582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950559,0.0020722735,0.0016743521,0.00027493885,0.00045843958,0.000006382806,0.00041928387,0.000025844587,0.000012548262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756277,0.00004345819,0.0009787937,0.000902339,0.000026168073,0.00048646133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986344,0.00023080627,0.0004255453,0.0005844874,0.000011790367,0.000112979156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001949628,0.00028251976,0.0004068021,0.00007766742,0.00022361816,0.00019007109,0.0007503767,0.00010724169,0.0000044662456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011960057,0.00023331531,0.00008388889,0.0001763277,0.00007757899,0.0011750378,0.00021035416,0.00021671278,0.0000125717615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011469886,0.0020217183,0.44573647,0.0007828518,0.0035225265,0.000037634814,0.012950822,0.27892038,0.0042112847,0.14808598,0.009952769,0.09263057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022730986,0.00012747681,0.7465971,0.00017755863,0.000085311876,0.000035675163,0.0018634879,0.22380182,0.00012371366,0.012285053,0.01147955,0.0011501622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012725818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014287187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3008606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026259132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018399185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089324017","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00252.x","title":"On export rivalry and the greening of agriculture–the role of eco‐labels","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Agriculture; Greening; International trade; Economics; International economics; Race (biology); Business; Microeconomics; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.008333353454829629,"score_gpt":0.15608982043585287,"score_spread":0.14775646698102324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089324017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98083264,0.0015683861,0.00002093343,0.0012435719,0.00017903451,0.00030781346,0.00008214974,0.000014561219,0.015750922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801254,0.001031835,0.00028837065,0.00020512514,0.00009579499,0.00003629334,0.000020045953,0.000018533947,0.00029147833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982625,0.000022128801,0.0009840322,0.00042347092,0.000029152485,0.00027871632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822706,0.00017639041,0.001086262,0.00042203354,0.000017215007,0.00007101229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051792717,0.00025508442,0.0006159976,0.0000651536,0.00014282617,0.000041035877,0.00046217532,0.00012671064,0.000052486896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059847207,0.00015037424,0.00022810457,0.00010606658,0.00036879466,0.00025547645,0.00014863604,0.00019975314,0.000077298835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036674504,0.000066034314,0.00651951,0.000013224425,0.00015732585,3.1612737e-7,0.00081208826,0.009898118,0.0002941008,0.981643,0.0001177247,0.00044183253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006621135,0.00033108774,0.41565105,0.000074043324,0.00008821567,0.000062636595,0.0027388337,0.0005714099,0.01950214,0.53825533,0.015065597,0.0010384993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046513882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068189955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4433877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015387633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001171195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61320835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097976094","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00424.x","title":"An error corrected almost ideal demand system for major cereals in Kenya","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Consortium pour la recherche économique en Afrique; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Sorghum; Consumption (sociology); Agricultural economics; Error correction model; Econometrics; Price elasticity of demand; Microeconomics; Cointegration; Agronomy; Biology; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.012669966625113934,"score_gpt":0.20426396804225624,"score_spread":0.1915940014171423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097976094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771374,0.00025265364,0.000049563612,0.0006029591,0.0022971628,0.00094784476,0.00065956207,0.00013235991,0.017920481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609596,0.000074372416,0.0017395451,0.00016679101,0.0006575632,0.00019758707,0.0004889269,0.00004471527,0.00053451397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970062,0.00002004014,0.0013150983,0.00093785045,0.000021088445,0.0006997476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982912,0.00014834196,0.0006887002,0.0004918122,0.00008121753,0.0002987592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007089733,0.00043330144,0.0008915483,0.00020361738,0.00020774693,0.00028174964,0.0006487597,0.00044730678,0.00010715315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006937987,0.00038664322,0.00027128085,0.00018534697,0.00006262911,0.0009626391,0.00007557243,0.00039953928,0.00031414375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045418344,0.00079156365,0.1216037,0.00038001864,0.00047531267,0.0000140936245,0.0015465155,0.0014440116,0.008858053,0.8460414,0.016612038,0.0017791067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058671758,0.00060836226,0.9175791,0.000068869784,0.0000649673,0.00020606113,0.0026718462,0.0063811527,0.0026005188,0.014352544,0.04686498,0.0027344108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047257607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043350374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8316889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026203573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003214632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100682722","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00163.x","title":"The economic costs and benefits of a participatory project to conserve maize landraces on farms in Oaxaca, Mexico<sup>⋆</sup>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Social benefits; Citizen journalism; Cost–benefit analysis; Economics; Business; Value (mathematics); Welfare; Public economics; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Finance; Political science; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04884707338110702,"score_gpt":0.25459415863494744,"score_spread":0.20574708525384042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100682722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99366784,0.00024570504,4.1852044e-8,0.002921128,0.00008842362,0.0005167008,0.00008623404,0.000019624973,0.0024543146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987178,0.0005247508,0.000048592625,0.00029671346,0.000073010546,0.000080648635,0.000033796343,0.0000014632799,0.00022321042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986293,0.00013258462,0.00047946937,0.0003503244,0.00006412265,0.0003442484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873435,0.0007913888,0.0002449748,0.00007771495,0.000061691804,0.000089853966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045074231,0.00021990128,0.00027415663,0.000020549622,0.0002667795,0.00016063997,0.00022587234,0.00010748523,0.000051858424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010724013,0.00006834905,0.000066186636,0.00025024047,0.00007586842,0.00030501117,0.000059794074,0.00015662547,0.000042864318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010940406,0.0008211471,0.3583835,0.0000816354,0.00054852385,0.000011044225,0.0052439747,0.045393378,0.016265055,0.38866928,0.025613124,0.15787528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000625681,0.0008458761,0.8780528,0.00008081045,0.000033678432,0.000045940906,0.012843341,0.00032690619,0.00644295,0.0006491487,0.09930277,0.0007501204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009807672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063409763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5196693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013802579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022259212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35384136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105274608","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00620.x","title":"Do stronger intellectual property rights promote seed exchange: evidence from U.S. seed exports?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; European Commission; Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Regina","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Developing country; International trade; Business; TRIPS Agreement; International economics; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09349116824437065,"score_gpt":0.21151163682918567,"score_spread":0.11802046858481502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105274608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845961,0.00055925397,0.000023274899,0.00041427158,0.0013768189,0.000593856,0.000008602676,0.00015664916,0.012271206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909908,0.0000923487,0.00015032271,0.00051437924,0.0036310856,0.000040415325,0.00015665816,0.000028973993,0.004395026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823195,0.00002451777,0.000458173,0.00047387063,0.0001416299,0.0006698715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911726,0.000099773126,0.00026297115,0.00028723915,0.00017142904,0.00006136067],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030291025,0.00039973273,0.00036035196,0.000091761875,0.00034999687,0.0005015335,0.0004403413,0.00017569066,0.0028583598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001715631,0.00020534251,0.00015917736,0.00021887914,0.00006932029,0.004052767,0.00032376696,0.00028277852,0.0053114193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003949321,0.0040921206,0.24901845,0.0020831875,0.00326221,0.000083757965,0.07369048,0.0013012954,0.061320186,0.005077473,0.52318436,0.07293719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022534705,0.0002040386,0.32675603,0.00097176374,0.00058895024,0.000054795193,0.0040503717,0.006913981,0.01685058,0.0014165099,0.63574183,0.004197655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025013606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002565998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112557516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012667368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016151524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99805313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116371385","doi":"10.1111/agec.12245","title":"On the nature and magnitude of cost economies in hog production","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economies of scale; Marginal cost; Production (economics); Economics; Unit cost; Function (biology); Unit (ring theory); Scale (ratio); Factor price; Production function; Quadratic equation; Econometrics; Returns to scale; Microeconomics; Agricultural economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010240824747254476,"score_gpt":0.1840847930490585,"score_spread":0.17384396830180404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116371385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712006,0.00006745814,1.8922256e-8,0.02650817,0.00015964113,0.00033269517,0.00006172862,0.000014514415,0.0016551941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981414,0.00072841585,0.000008501509,0.00033975733,0.00023132827,0.000031893785,0.000015310174,9.163575e-7,0.0005024694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912167,0.0000352095,0.0002902077,0.00029819945,0.00002899642,0.00022570216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929994,0.00036828467,0.0001738479,0.00006379266,0.000035304907,0.00005880724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016545253,0.00016835137,0.00021035277,0.000012432756,0.0000945832,0.000041342613,0.00021029726,0.00013946331,0.0001249145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007885726,0.00003783025,0.0000715455,0.000091338254,0.00009814823,0.00023159728,0.00006776453,0.00013852921,0.000038058253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024970266,0.00029013085,0.04575388,0.0000330373,0.0001348174,0.000001952431,0.0005011384,0.00022670561,0.21759333,0.47425812,0.01621118,0.24474601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020083615,0.00014179671,0.97399575,0.000045761222,0.0000068783547,0.000015300351,0.00045382354,0.000007672712,0.00961451,0.005167826,0.010083404,0.00026642147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015090113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002266326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007335713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000050287954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1542673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120460765","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00506.x","title":"Transaction costs in milk marketing: a comparison between Canada and Great Britain","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Pooling; Business; Database transaction; Marketing; Industrial organization; Finance","score_opus":0.00988010875852153,"score_gpt":0.18935295257228013,"score_spread":0.1794728438137586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120460765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947352,0.00004577392,9.298602e-8,0.003391165,0.00021643355,0.00023394953,0.000120797566,0.000027604598,0.0012289856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988259,0.00009809167,0.000051284478,0.00016202684,0.00042475248,0.000014134277,0.00019924107,0.0000014256483,0.00022315569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987019,0.00005058121,0.0004256573,0.0003762737,0.000051734634,0.00039388967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992358,0.0003147561,0.00015023616,0.000049530925,0.000031614036,0.00021802919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022986956,0.00023485567,0.00034669146,0.000011848986,0.00014461874,0.0001229213,0.00021137387,0.00016879437,0.00012451244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027091593,0.00009382581,0.00006662419,0.0001350015,0.00004386774,0.00023917791,0.000042710828,0.00034831162,0.0000093852195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006366859,0.000060252416,0.67591727,0.000020584159,0.00005289044,0.000004631963,0.00017465714,0.00004660123,0.043057654,0.00089728326,0.003530575,0.27617392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001934228,0.000036146634,0.977658,0.00000921735,0.000009752311,0.000020393454,0.00038462228,0.000091792615,0.00068114913,0.000055657645,0.020543145,0.0003167564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5072265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9791868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47196025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019203007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025683543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49605492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130289939","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00014.x","title":"Modeling the demand for alcoholic beverages and advertising specifications","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Dominance (genetics); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03557117354293129,"score_gpt":0.1977816732846012,"score_spread":0.1622104997416699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130289939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705023,0.0030141948,0.0002918972,0.004244621,0.00017892977,0.00047559,0.00013166343,0.000042168216,0.021118613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911437,0.0048232405,0.0008676743,0.00041979432,0.00034118848,0.00008224256,0.00006186004,0.00001807051,0.0022422243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985991,0.0000086504115,0.00058884936,0.0004696198,0.000010821277,0.0003229477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993913,0.00009232195,0.00014613065,0.0002469071,0.000027542888,0.000095779964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028619662,0.00021146482,0.0003297423,0.000043867847,0.0004329976,0.00024535137,0.0002723352,0.00011104968,0.0001455791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021088958,0.00015224959,0.00015702289,0.00007359331,0.00005280709,0.0005131339,0.000038796003,0.00012283043,0.00016009987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012100919,0.00016495075,0.004290966,0.00008511967,0.0006443896,9.866098e-7,0.0025287755,0.06612712,0.00022440564,0.8888626,0.012104022,0.024845624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036848483,0.0002874162,0.26187354,0.00006686142,0.00014784127,0.00018429852,0.0015168105,0.13547957,0.00037086348,0.23016754,0.36341283,0.002807581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007315474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000088096764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6586951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072793235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071335176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6208558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133304460","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00313.x","title":"More reasons why farmers have so little interest in futures markets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Hedge; Economics; Market neutral; Certainty; Portfolio; Incentive; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Transaction cost; Leverage (statistics); Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Actuarial science; Financial economics","score_opus":0.022834911328094922,"score_gpt":0.2039505958542268,"score_spread":0.1811156845261319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133304460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924898,0.00041827012,2.2968172e-7,0.004718132,0.00026280442,0.0002905781,0.00005142927,0.0000838763,0.0016848883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541056,0.00180161,0.00006903039,0.00054884143,0.00043218068,0.000029174109,0.0001707688,0.0000018311766,0.0015360279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828124,0.00006911669,0.00041627794,0.00056413055,0.0000920393,0.0005772157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992933,0.00016018581,0.00016617998,0.000088879504,0.000066184024,0.00022525396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010809811,0.0003401403,0.00035125675,0.00002033035,0.0005186274,0.000103380655,0.00051902677,0.00021995562,0.00022464908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004607313,0.000107808235,0.00021659148,0.00027780878,0.00023652303,0.0004286178,0.00015747297,0.00030824076,0.00010325901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044405434,0.0010798072,0.5824547,0.00005616586,0.00019590998,0.00029461324,0.0061227223,0.0010556782,0.10580821,0.0032946325,0.15497062,0.14422292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019149033,0.00008384712,0.95940906,0.000026625905,0.0000075666794,0.0001634723,0.0059647956,0.00003630617,0.0009926145,0.000083844716,0.032611992,0.00042838205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012305562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008230401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37695438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013173561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014458838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45927572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143386581","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00017.x","title":"Rural employment in industrialised countries<sup>⋆</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"International Association for Applied Econometrics","keywords":"Restructuring; Diversity (politics); Rural area; Agriculture; Economic restructuring; Rural economics; Economic geography; Globalization; Consumption (sociology); Banner; Economic growth; Rural sociology; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Rural development; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.012317143030742885,"score_gpt":0.19176497795297107,"score_spread":0.17944783492222818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143386581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903906,0.00006663993,1.3866282e-8,0.005165241,0.00008280396,0.00044857297,0.00003257768,0.00007495829,0.0037385747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945666,0.00029309036,0.000014827011,0.00036603227,0.00020486898,0.00004242689,0.00023633242,0.0000011727635,0.0042746193],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984683,0.00007218912,0.00049668486,0.0003419741,0.00010195005,0.0005189379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995905,0.000105204745,0.00007229679,0.00006868741,0.000048513444,0.00011475851],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023808253,0.0002529862,0.00031137254,0.000013212453,0.00017470635,0.00015685728,0.00032640676,0.00019346407,0.002987037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018738298,0.000092495386,0.00011917184,0.00027193068,0.00006255211,0.0004332413,0.000053604883,0.0001898625,0.00029345948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065923034,0.00057838473,0.24584049,0.000029854526,0.000121511715,0.00003301085,0.0028373597,0.0053374516,0.002060816,0.003503871,0.026304148,0.71269387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006983367,0.00012460262,0.8166734,0.00002051298,0.000008246783,0.0000105482495,0.0029087411,0.00015996005,0.00032222143,0.0008556711,0.1776678,0.0005499544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009339673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005022462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7121439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000308752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022385615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144347121","doi":"10.1111/agec.12125","title":"Geographical indication regulation and intra‐trade in the European Union","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"European union; International trade; Resizing; Geographical indication; International economics; Gravity model of trade; Business; Trade barrier; Panel data; Economics; Geography; Regional science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.017956361369333516,"score_gpt":0.16484821069487,"score_spread":0.14689184932553648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144347121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95490974,0.00014308884,0.00014060189,0.0073690754,0.00015387354,0.00016617485,0.00001748439,0.000023490045,0.0370765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860924,0.0004164273,0.00015301837,0.0005061192,0.0001902623,0.000008483621,0.000084222054,0.000009605742,0.000022625978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988249,0.00010162483,0.00050555496,0.00033369524,0.000012694645,0.00022153996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943465,0.00005825913,0.00024041712,0.0002047306,0.000004551796,0.000057379253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013885831,0.00014037892,0.00021093788,0.00009921302,0.00010248523,0.000145979,0.00024029786,0.00008826071,0.000015158977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003251269,0.00011250978,0.00006230162,0.00014408042,0.0000647206,0.00035095625,0.00003799753,0.00016593123,0.00014361939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003738012,0.00005807785,0.11307251,0.000013748325,0.000020895906,3.6301398e-7,0.0007170438,0.00070058333,0.000026146816,0.8744809,0.0008450859,0.010060912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032356047,0.000033759257,0.93696696,0.0000048307897,0.0000035807939,0.0000152068515,0.00016564793,0.0012303207,0.000008511787,0.04056377,0.020503595,0.00018023612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010065543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014593982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83391714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005834499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024380233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45880157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146266908","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00137.x","title":"An option perspective on generating and maintaining plant variety rights in China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"China; Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Revenue; Incentive; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Property rights; Productivity; Business; Plant variety; International trade; Developing country; Economics; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Law; Finance; Engineering; Microeconomics; Political science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.023975787054001062,"score_gpt":0.18305064445781236,"score_spread":0.1590748574038113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146266908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788802,0.000010471298,0.000018693734,0.00018971851,0.00012330276,0.00011978161,0.000002709843,0.000032678294,0.020622406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986016,0.0000039933598,0.00012762734,0.0002561737,0.0008007453,0.0000044927247,0.00010865194,0.0000051829925,0.00009153127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940586,0.000008435354,0.00015834183,0.00023003246,0.000030364792,0.00016698278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998186,0.000012794441,0.000077890625,0.00005439441,0.00002880745,0.000007484989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010455652,0.000125453,0.000112286885,0.00005903095,0.00021099896,0.00025972901,0.00007010543,0.0000553092,0.000027920376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007641258,0.00008158655,0.000024598312,0.00006806547,0.000017318562,0.00078799675,0.000028371991,0.000114679155,0.000046980236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013569111,0.00017699628,0.005082139,0.000023514105,0.000024408213,0.000011892464,0.0010630667,0.05642466,0.0019262116,0.9334495,0.0008322965,0.00084962475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016469398,0.00015926255,0.54907304,0.000111224996,0.00003839411,0.000031044776,0.0044435565,0.40350187,0.0010193784,0.0346877,0.0041812807,0.0011062742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009268229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00249971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8987618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010048368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031647646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148474297","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00554.x","title":"Does acquisition of a cooperative generate profits for the buyer? The Dairyworld case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hubris; Economics; Profitability index; Market liquidity; Stock (firearms); Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Economic shortage; Empirical evidence; Position (finance); Industrial organization; Financial economics; Business; Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.028730997844449803,"score_gpt":0.19048565087407013,"score_spread":0.16175465302962033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148474297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959187,0.000053835625,0.00009628246,0.0019662282,0.00042217714,0.000532888,0.000039573515,0.000015795895,0.00095452875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997502,0.000048317903,0.000058305664,0.0007812012,0.0006994655,0.000098235236,0.000018517489,0.000006798583,0.0007871029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995012,0.00000406511,0.00018939826,0.00014826562,0.000025762638,0.00013127389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999323,0.000047781203,0.0003200563,0.00014078234,0.00016429933,0.000004065557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012475206,0.000111819354,0.00011590011,0.000011387072,0.00025476035,0.00008158072,0.00017601108,0.000028017355,0.000033781398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014246893,0.000038546586,0.000069937276,0.00011020708,0.000050296425,0.00062653417,0.000053201336,0.00004922529,0.000024159415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008463139,0.00038545183,0.03698338,0.00049044203,0.00067595596,0.00007474211,0.0042414595,0.006721949,0.0037738835,0.8209154,0.09731021,0.027580822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030451338,0.00013860047,0.80917704,0.00012938066,0.00059387804,0.000137813,0.009131565,0.018613052,0.015428476,0.0081598265,0.13409036,0.0013548814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079594174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021578083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8127556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016100965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010098545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19594364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155115835","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00202.x","title":"An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Pesticide; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Agriculture; Damages; Cost–benefit analysis; Willingness to pay; Economics; Natural resource economics; Pesticide residue; Business; Agricultural economics; Geography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06507472808022119,"score_gpt":0.20047452175902086,"score_spread":0.13539979367879967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155115835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948382,0.00053677993,0.000015114204,0.00028011965,0.0008354147,0.0003537846,0.00032179418,0.000016081245,0.0028027613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985939,0.0004941997,0.0001420521,0.000044923974,0.0002645013,0.000034213528,0.00027977777,0.000017967093,0.00012844901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985464,0.000041987223,0.00071225804,0.00046233472,0.000038440157,0.00019857427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884975,0.000021776617,0.00062763283,0.00041963454,0.000007253718,0.000073942385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049247296,0.0001849782,0.0002816447,0.000046447953,0.00013676283,0.0000446985,0.00031430722,0.000117862524,0.0015903924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011704276,0.00016183552,0.00015213237,0.000038082126,0.00009006333,0.000710441,0.000059910177,0.000098152355,0.000697985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022142274,0.00019641468,0.7384679,0.0000031524023,0.00012957834,8.7198465e-8,0.0006550343,0.22556183,0.001505763,0.024327617,0.0002418063,0.008888702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005817896,0.000039427137,0.97271925,0.0000054656825,0.00004306123,0.000010359471,0.00039276862,0.015676418,0.0011018448,0.008788647,0.00040523673,0.00023571652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005892291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013323486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2342514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008934476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017904875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155188666","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00223.x","title":"Calculating the cost of irrigation induced soil salinization in the tungabhadra project","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute","keywords":"Soil salinity; Irrigation; Environmental science; Soil retrogression and degradation; Production (economics); Natural resource economics; Range (aeronautics); Water resource management; Soil water; Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Agricultural engineering; Soil science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.017046278857254616,"score_gpt":0.1961096637008263,"score_spread":0.17906338484357168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155188666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964293,0.000011160486,0.00041082012,0.0002680635,0.00007717565,0.00039076057,0.0000014687713,0.000032774693,0.0023784467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964577,0.00001964105,0.00012808987,0.00003689169,0.00005596342,0.00002257624,0.00007436798,0.0000062793583,0.000010419548],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995868,0.000018166305,0.00019977275,0.000067790104,0.000037042846,0.00009040721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998186,0.000020480746,0.000058122092,0.00008054228,0.000015905858,0.0000063258076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012273426,0.00007328879,0.00006875599,0.00002780178,0.00004621154,0.0000506176,0.00012455524,0.000036081547,0.0000015186181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000933984,0.0000378481,0.000026556678,0.00017378782,0.000010350948,0.00018137209,0.000014655707,0.00007265501,0.0000039546553],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011639812,0.0000057485495,0.00034613896,0.000012368261,0.00000831596,1.0600846e-7,0.002250838,0.99450433,0.00040202303,0.001838855,0.000030372006,0.0005997228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023988106,0.00010128189,0.31840378,0.00014934533,0.00009430548,0.000012445594,0.0123336995,0.64288276,0.019253979,0.0022770849,0.0013446038,0.00074791233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014734676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003147878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35162157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006953488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004578725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15434007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163416113","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00342.x","title":"A joint test of market power, menu costs, and currency invoicing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Invoice; Currency; Exchange-rate pass-through; Profit margin; Monetary economics; Profit (economics); Exchange rate; Economics; Market power; Business; Commerce; International economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.041451785465710794,"score_gpt":0.17756321654955431,"score_spread":0.13611143108384352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163416113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.918869,0.0017742128,0.000008808179,0.0004565642,0.00034386298,0.00018319256,0.000245012,0.000029468714,0.07808985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356985,0.004948658,0.00052023213,0.00016005005,0.0000721222,0.000010734688,0.000026451056,0.000016188587,0.0006757267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982674,0.00000760201,0.00091899623,0.00044575037,0.000015231571,0.0003450245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989702,0.00007759106,0.00052989094,0.00023983375,0.00002987488,0.00015262514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021041454,0.00023937861,0.00061513274,0.000106234234,0.00013337212,0.000042230393,0.00020175701,0.00012879167,0.00019760757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009293131,0.00023398566,0.00014973643,0.00011518002,0.00012730744,0.00045556788,0.00010803803,0.00015122947,0.00016210089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042207816,0.0005108489,0.55810493,0.00016399434,0.000321671,0.000013718894,0.0020870408,0.0002239006,0.0005336566,0.4030791,0.033460543,0.0014583875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015791751,0.00031155464,0.94031173,0.000055435787,0.000018609582,0.0002645486,0.0008239544,0.0011959297,0.00076199457,0.007716087,0.04595842,0.0010025497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002445556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047386075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.395363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019444794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018922747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9541658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166116338","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00201.x","title":"Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Productivity; Productivity model; Nonparametric statistics; Agricultural productivity; Production (economics); Strengths and weaknesses; Econometrics; Economics; Environmental economics; Index (typography); Agriculture; Computer science; Microeconomics; Total factor productivity; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.08925002270392976,"score_gpt":0.38488001681834616,"score_spread":0.2956299941144164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166116338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028796,0.00007706276,0.0933839,0.0015766787,0.0002534898,0.0002958865,0.000025236104,0.000030060735,0.0014781074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95936376,0.00004381447,0.03615783,0.00016505331,0.00017643995,0.000036482033,0.00004769039,0.000008212821,0.0040007057],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755746,0.00023776449,0.00071835733,0.00093036355,0.00023428988,0.00032175318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723893,0.001356093,0.00053015485,0.00059302984,0.00016750055,0.00011430547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029918423,0.00021197545,0.00056670734,0.00029973127,0.000243145,0.00029105035,0.0008811003,0.00007536086,0.00024602577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011135018,0.0001321563,0.0006054804,0.0014319544,0.00010903829,0.0005687084,0.0001530693,0.0000991798,0.0001473625],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015197898,0.0005951087,0.052052528,0.000005047502,0.0033063304,0.0000039824745,0.0015522063,0.63162977,0.01881273,0.00823853,0.0031944271,0.2804574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009993076,0.0002329819,0.4912815,0.000005091656,0.0022368894,0.00003874431,0.002544383,0.36491236,0.019094544,0.03269348,0.084689215,0.0012714943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011952289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041873625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43922898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022556343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022645125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5389178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168720761","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00100.x","title":"Downward sloping demand for environmental amenities and international compensation: elephant conservation and strategic culling","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Natural resource economics; Economics; Welfare; Culling; Compensation (psychology); Resource (disambiguation); Business; Microeconomics; Market economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.1337996515511852,"score_gpt":0.21987660586746957,"score_spread":0.08607695431628437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168720761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879623,0.0011938603,0.000079352256,0.0019238768,0.0002838399,0.0002356566,0.00045438774,0.000020467003,0.007846231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902808,0.0072529805,0.0008082744,0.00051081355,0.00024525772,0.000039362618,0.00019987237,0.00001237364,0.0006502655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905026,0.0000043264376,0.0004333155,0.0003063791,0.000008383792,0.00019733617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995359,0.00005882879,0.00025760988,0.00007338508,0.000008230942,0.00006602112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012243107,0.00015426477,0.0002547083,0.0000680491,0.0001756389,0.0002129628,0.00008127211,0.00007886227,0.00014554804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009245881,0.0001613592,0.000052311872,0.000018691508,0.0000720986,0.00042657877,0.000049634396,0.00006168437,0.0000501873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006504218,0.00012242672,0.06384612,0.00016131873,0.00029061447,9.440046e-7,0.003951527,0.00071233767,0.0003488296,0.9254712,0.0010085569,0.004021083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007855824,0.00054894586,0.16956832,0.00011570735,0.0001010309,0.00033024297,0.016098645,0.41932306,0.00049879914,0.23427859,0.14809398,0.0031868678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004153847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007251315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120587894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017041001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65800375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212629604","doi":"10.1111/agec.12213","title":"Reassessing marketing boards as hybrid arrangements: evidence from Canadian experiences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Franchising Strategies and Performance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Wageningen University and Research","keywords":"Embeddedness; Transaction cost; Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Marketing; Economics; Property rights; Industrial organization; Business; Point (geometry); Microeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.028396429287067544,"score_gpt":0.2172295936977585,"score_spread":0.18883316441069095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212629604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95273495,0.00042500437,0.0000043620503,0.0013227944,0.0014054008,0.0001086985,0.000004054145,0.00006356196,0.043931186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963944,0.00007793641,0.00024020164,0.0010266581,0.0018908253,0.000020854477,0.000060631937,0.000011313856,0.00027720167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998961,0.000009671107,0.00025722466,0.00030900707,0.000096560216,0.00036656333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994239,0.000043381515,0.0001864731,0.0001655396,0.00011464633,0.00006605261],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032976604,0.00019081653,0.00017845468,0.000066231034,0.00028816285,0.0010936473,0.00032513458,0.000045220226,0.00030826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014020632,0.00014624918,0.000056839155,0.00013413596,0.00004704142,0.0034441845,0.00007277655,0.00010584563,0.00037200973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059436075,0.00016139021,0.29166853,0.0004306245,0.00042610682,0.0001615641,0.01034452,0.00959856,0.0012042683,0.006859563,0.54834074,0.13020979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015735305,0.00005954096,0.35736513,0.001310341,0.00015441616,0.000039979564,0.10054231,0.020203691,0.0004864575,0.0031171513,0.5124815,0.0026659262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23921295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04326204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1959509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018018026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011118199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238630183","doi":"10.1111/agec.12240","title":"Farmers’ risk preferences and pesticide use decisions: evidence from field experiments in China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China; Renmin University of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Consumption (sociology); Agricultural economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Agriculture; Economics; Food security; Business; Natural resource economics; Agricultural science; Expected utility hypothesis; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.0357723293584179,"score_gpt":0.23257308369802338,"score_spread":0.19680075433960548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238630183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99741924,0.0006965507,0.000004537643,0.0013078244,0.00015674473,0.00024054768,0.000062420506,0.000040236522,0.000071927534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860965,0.013203604,0.0002615144,0.00007270654,0.00013461619,0.000025946732,0.000015706506,8.7012745e-7,0.00018855941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985199,0.00009438067,0.00036963646,0.000566598,0.000102870246,0.0003465969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972958,0.0022342997,0.00018444771,0.00007737138,0.0000362161,0.00017184677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011273954,0.00024654268,0.00026310314,0.000012307931,0.0001967482,0.00015379848,0.0003474738,0.00014843511,0.0001804027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006030063,0.00006088693,0.000079082136,0.00014889626,0.00007932433,0.0010515517,0.00018001295,0.00013754876,0.00005528172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051743038,0.00003895536,0.74949414,8.8572654e-7,0.000013744776,0.000002896036,0.00026734167,0.000017776938,0.0570198,0.000052575917,0.0003486589,0.19269149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001629781,0.0001606446,0.9919283,0.0001849582,0.000011467207,0.000005677118,0.0006974507,0.00001540738,0.0052864635,0.0009048777,0.00035966828,0.0002821134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074425014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006420055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24243416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006213674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006421192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407114592","doi":"10.1111/agec.12238","title":"Using proportional modeling to evaluate irrigator preferences for market‐based water reallocation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Government (linguistics); Apportionment; Debt; Public economics; Agricultural economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.04013839730717136,"score_gpt":0.22084346626465232,"score_spread":0.18070506895748095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407114592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9136979,0.0000039909773,0.08445087,0.00031837524,0.00017281443,0.00042391993,0.000009635776,0.00009475073,0.00082776416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98977417,0.000006547453,0.009543005,0.000027506683,0.0001169521,0.00007223873,0.00007487401,0.000013207115,0.00037151322],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944174,0.000006982221,0.00019334332,0.0001468149,0.000040127907,0.00017098123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997953,0.000009260724,0.000022326692,0.00006853019,0.0000571337,0.000047416626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000106614716,0.00010522807,0.00008594249,0.000042070384,0.0000551126,0.000054009557,0.00008189718,0.000036815356,0.000051177925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054576676,0.000053430747,0.000038430935,0.000026510364,0.0000053517647,0.00024823257,0.000016581973,0.000016378004,0.000023199196],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014131457,0.0000037773775,0.0000946325,0.000024242452,0.000018833194,2.8253474e-8,0.000037586,0.99450195,0.0040124767,0.000112336005,0.00031089995,0.000869079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002569267,0.000016863907,0.00031888412,0.000026125557,0.000020319634,3.2548246e-7,0.000027813558,0.99080986,0.007135834,0.0003871353,0.00083701906,0.0001628793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006343031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014993204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07607628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019619956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005823423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21788426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460224083","doi":"10.1111/agec.12250","title":"Farm share of the food dollar: an IO approach for the United States and Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Agricultural economics; Boom; Economics; Commodity; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Food systems; Market share; Food prices; Food security; Business; Agriculture; Geography; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.018168432684712247,"score_gpt":0.16266761067724367,"score_spread":0.14449917799253142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460224083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912755,0.0007839684,0.00009528396,0.0031431373,0.0003289149,0.0005732389,0.0020649366,0.00001439408,0.0017206394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970698,0.0011922001,0.0002318712,0.0004995957,0.00015250292,0.00006958153,0.0001585882,0.000017083788,0.0006088063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870753,0.00001428466,0.00055959687,0.00039737413,0.000019049205,0.00030215364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987574,0.00023473571,0.0004819117,0.00036227558,0.000068463414,0.00009517422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024968814,0.00022061933,0.0003523832,0.00003535383,0.00023303344,0.000080825776,0.0005616894,0.000101402824,0.000019058696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051997024,0.00009919764,0.00013228705,0.000095746254,0.00009462512,0.00022750293,0.00012763363,0.00008869258,0.0000022600518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001697105,0.0002534715,0.06274536,0.00021460636,0.0014266866,3.162988e-7,0.0013010848,0.0033198085,0.00030107357,0.89020467,0.036056023,0.004007166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003973629,0.0006809844,0.58946556,0.000058781432,0.00013552776,0.000047019188,0.0059832158,0.0047724373,0.002163663,0.025253568,0.36565378,0.0018118145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042983662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.241234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86495113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001533691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004218878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9633892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470996720","doi":"10.1111/agec.12248","title":"Cattle sharing and rental contracts in an Agrarian economy: evidence from Ethiopia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Renting; Moral hazard; Cash; Business; Economics; Multivariate probit model; Crop insurance; Population; Incentive; Agriculture; Finance; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.024617638815672353,"score_gpt":0.21684856763177127,"score_spread":0.1922309288160989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470996720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955156,0.00036244874,3.823309e-7,0.00333649,0.00014467411,0.00022269151,0.000057863486,0.000054739223,0.0003051323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832493,0.0009130557,0.000045076788,0.00012861073,0.000286152,0.000018984541,0.00006683178,9.963151e-7,0.00021537645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984643,0.000049821134,0.00035965384,0.0006775329,0.000053290467,0.00039539355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913573,0.00033947013,0.00015114021,0.000086763386,0.000042062333,0.00024483324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014790554,0.00024294849,0.00028002463,0.000011393107,0.00016900047,0.00019040292,0.0004162906,0.00017617477,0.00014683598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005284837,0.00006725284,0.000069641326,0.00010658968,0.000101545265,0.0015547005,0.00015786226,0.0001438592,0.00008795582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065204884,0.00008037775,0.6442286,0.000004652496,0.00001909383,0.0000071315417,0.00048768174,0.00003572426,0.29809514,0.0010649286,0.00026417067,0.055647336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000231987,0.00012129001,0.9932778,0.000094467534,0.000008173254,0.000013370722,0.0006901904,0.00003535298,0.0034863031,0.00094766665,0.0007513278,0.00034210342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019935577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016759839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34904918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012401183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000085310885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9352384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508875124","doi":"10.1111/agec.12386","title":"Nonfarm employment, agricultural intensification, and productivity change: empirical findings from Uganda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Nonfarm payrolls; Productivity; Agriculture; Economics; Agricultural productivity; Agricultural economics; Farm income; Labour economics; Production (economics); Economic growth; Geography; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.10751124422057891,"score_gpt":0.28877870861513805,"score_spread":0.18126746439455915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508875124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606304,0.00015835323,4.3220206e-7,0.036897868,0.00045304417,0.00048714367,0.00017995958,0.00010326378,0.0010895346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961957,0.00033938323,0.0001657917,0.00042147338,0.001353246,0.000087366745,0.000547519,0.0000022912332,0.0008872448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981907,0.000056959976,0.00043002758,0.0007783363,0.00012968312,0.00041431675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859405,0.00019837198,0.0005115137,0.00021364195,0.000292771,0.00018965694],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022265305,0.00037186313,0.00037708276,0.000013217155,0.0016444745,0.0010991936,0.000591623,0.0002074403,0.00020269258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019153568,0.00012613462,0.00012104665,0.00015178742,0.00019039192,0.0023741578,0.000333399,0.00029827183,0.000092668415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014667078,0.00049006724,0.52995616,0.000024222365,0.0003667402,0.000008816032,0.0019921141,0.0000049415044,0.3069159,0.004033529,0.024360342,0.13170052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001829922,0.000092934846,0.9588414,0.00001888725,0.000041175514,0.000032614596,0.0010871281,0.000013418793,0.0026829327,0.00033611,0.036220595,0.00044984545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022204658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031932124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42888522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080579695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007172009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559919590","doi":"10.1111/agec.12322","title":"Is late really better than never? The farmer welfare effects of pineapple adoption in Ghana","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"United States Agency for International Development; International Growth Centre; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Welfare; Shock (circulatory); Economics; Context (archaeology); Agriculture; Asset (computer security); Agricultural economics; Survey data collection; Developing country; Economic growth; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.013423194440280601,"score_gpt":0.20278614699696865,"score_spread":0.18936295255668806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559919590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95202464,0.00006741031,8.918572e-7,0.046637595,0.0001484997,0.00029776312,0.00004649652,0.00002485415,0.00075185683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979997,0.00022649132,0.00006966463,0.00064321473,0.0001967261,0.000033630586,0.000063738036,0.0000011477609,0.0007656561],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891996,0.00006619573,0.00038836306,0.0002803078,0.00008144731,0.00026369313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991649,0.00030520785,0.00030830005,0.00007940076,0.00009645331,0.000045757148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015943039,0.00018902445,0.00021130363,0.000012805432,0.0001705737,0.00005786891,0.00030917407,0.000121065146,0.00031267092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028799264,0.000042112104,0.00012001163,0.0003403919,0.000059354323,0.00075195724,0.000081566744,0.00011639819,0.00005554134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016544899,0.00038760627,0.06863475,0.000093347175,0.0002554703,0.000007825592,0.0011971463,0.000042191416,0.50975007,0.016126797,0.015476623,0.3878627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023986847,0.00012802375,0.9574959,0.00004482363,0.000018719527,0.0000071392046,0.00077157497,0.000008433848,0.008884593,0.00025780196,0.03190408,0.00023898669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070505915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012641723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88886124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052093696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037642542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34235275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564364335","doi":"10.1111/agec.12351","title":"Demand for a labor‐based drought insurance scheme in Ethiopia: a stated choice experiment approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Cash; Index (typography); Payment; Actuarial science; Mixed logit; Wage; Economics; Work (physics); Subsidy; Business; Labour economics; Finance; Logistic regression; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01691481385973419,"score_gpt":0.22468237234448418,"score_spread":0.20776755848474998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564364335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951998,0.00030906717,0.000020648804,0.0030140444,0.00013588952,0.00076942454,0.00017927655,0.00008456487,0.00028729305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970325,0.00028769052,0.0010430197,0.00025721773,0.00025514833,0.0002890503,0.0001268894,0.000002145267,0.00070633175],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816203,0.000062893734,0.00045498586,0.0006337663,0.000107636006,0.00057866256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990082,0.00042842233,0.00019983275,0.000084494786,0.00011432683,0.0001647507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017775196,0.0003178588,0.0003585353,0.000015608694,0.00020696237,0.00007979295,0.00041427315,0.00021268846,0.00003804396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007771904,0.00008401528,0.00016027108,0.00033275405,0.00009273336,0.0004273867,0.00006723301,0.00012737991,0.000028224107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002673119,0.00062541733,0.17596342,0.00005833047,0.000057965044,0.0000032562143,0.00039490993,0.0007077215,0.7922038,0.0025222674,0.0022867112,0.024908895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012407645,0.00022680018,0.96249807,0.000066309374,0.0000058666956,0.0000064216665,0.00056443433,0.00024106451,0.022280365,0.00013871626,0.0121725,0.0005586759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022531212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009009306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78653467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017410217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018055356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34260437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739270677","doi":"10.1111/agec.12366","title":"Modeling regime‐dependent agricultural commodity price volatilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Economics; Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Kurtosis; Leverage (statistics); Leverage effect; Commodity market; Commodity; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03468277565516525,"score_gpt":0.21517869844149526,"score_spread":0.18049592278633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739270677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90835583,0.00034442707,0.0004868257,0.0014829347,0.0010192313,0.0003385225,0.00042424223,0.00008356822,0.08746441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359196,0.00032743707,0.000505986,0.00008566192,0.00034825277,0.000034135825,0.00013523518,0.000022791006,0.0049485234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975717,0.000023927774,0.000978887,0.0007872192,0.000046326564,0.00059195183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775964,0.000055804587,0.0007929588,0.0010694714,0.00010435132,0.00021774467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006798415,0.0003971376,0.0007053375,0.00006665243,0.0010925307,0.00088979123,0.0010775628,0.00024156927,0.00027196982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019893514,0.000335991,0.00031851514,0.00004966408,0.000119383236,0.0014300534,0.0004141458,0.00037164413,0.00020134376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014575341,0.00049379736,0.31728497,0.00026443513,0.00067374844,0.000009938621,0.0018994787,0.008066625,0.000103908125,0.6638015,0.0051561072,0.0020997385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009579271,0.000060401657,0.38857815,0.000029553903,0.000020460298,0.000025733423,0.0006125748,0.55871165,0.000031164647,0.04434109,0.0055262097,0.0011050787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016468108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007643451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6194604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036299662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021932745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800641050","doi":"10.1111/agec.12433","title":"Renters, landlords, and farmland stewardship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Renting; Stewardship (theology); Agriculture; Business; Agricultural economics; Agricultural land; Land tenure; Tillage; Land management; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Conservation agriculture; Land use; Economics; Environmental stewardship; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.011191939343607826,"score_gpt":0.17754740608850458,"score_spread":0.16635546674489676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800641050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99462825,0.00007351989,2.2560515e-7,0.0022784495,0.00026322817,0.00009076243,0.000030084746,0.000042698583,0.0025927634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994195,0.00039774278,0.000035766916,0.00014055794,0.0009731036,0.0000031511524,0.000072672774,5.642013e-7,0.004181454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993947,0.000011390893,0.00014081805,0.00021358625,0.000033591656,0.00020589319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975437,0.000024370322,0.000055556928,0.00003125227,0.00003080379,0.00010366784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006348224,0.00011852337,0.00013131902,0.000004285846,0.0002396019,0.00009530616,0.00011645926,0.00007732531,0.00013332072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030614774,0.000018067698,0.000047480647,0.000052432883,0.00008456052,0.0001496218,0.000058159963,0.00005725567,0.00006771701],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002820792,0.00031464425,0.14575654,0.000048992206,0.00031704048,0.000013224543,0.0014724114,0.0000052887403,0.058103584,0.014912575,0.03854914,0.7402245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023796767,0.0003245651,0.539211,0.000011325075,0.000011175329,0.000050889197,0.00036707887,0.000023699999,0.0010588142,0.00079528295,0.45765054,0.00025768057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022526406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018101556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7399668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001538311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022664506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18428484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932911785","doi":"10.1111/agec.12487","title":"Risk aversion and land allocation between annual and perennial crops in semisubsistence farming: a stochastic optimization approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Perennial plant; Agriculture; Economics; Production (economics); Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Agricultural economics; Yield (engineering); Agricultural science; Microeconomics; Environmental science; Agronomy; Geography; Financial economics","score_opus":0.005676887912370493,"score_gpt":0.16838098582648078,"score_spread":0.16270409791411028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932911785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989664,0.0001433983,0.000028155539,0.0001937868,0.000056579538,0.0003541219,0.00005434535,0.000027566199,0.00017563079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985883,0.0004356416,0.00044285748,0.000017217806,0.0001237989,0.000008749247,0.00018190597,0.000001000195,0.00020050506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989613,0.000051280447,0.0002369736,0.00043984293,0.000072730516,0.0002378214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995042,0.00014704245,0.00015162028,0.00003874611,0.000048204285,0.000110182584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001359428,0.00018581616,0.00022844602,0.00001446876,0.00017200089,0.000091250906,0.00013410462,0.0001454198,0.00001614306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026625596,0.0000667945,0.000038386195,0.00016229326,0.000060943257,0.00041102382,0.00010137315,0.00015994358,0.00000860338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004772764,0.000056516783,0.9089169,0.000024742632,0.000020156353,5.8217466e-7,0.0009474054,0.06829359,0.004052143,0.00007358426,0.000037291466,0.017529348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027498617,0.00011933657,0.98398215,0.000020790389,0.000018151713,0.000017070992,0.0025025895,0.012688529,0.000053271884,0.00002316996,0.000049355232,0.00025058346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068512064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037663916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07506525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004934879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048224947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27238005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950854548","doi":"10.1111/agec.12570","title":"Impacts of trade liberalization in Canada's supply managed dairy industry","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International trade; European union; Economic surplus; Free trade; Partial equilibrium; Welfare; Trade barrier; Liberalization; International economics; Negotiation; Business; General equilibrium theory; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.014138533024454671,"score_gpt":0.16289606817648378,"score_spread":0.1487575351520291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950854548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980044,0.00066029624,0.0000038054654,0.009109914,0.00023708455,0.00025945788,0.00027558347,0.00002080068,0.009389026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975735,0.0005533709,0.0001377746,0.0013537835,0.00014437565,0.0000112457365,0.00014705544,0.000018104014,0.000060805774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980946,0.000016236896,0.0010471843,0.00045376076,0.000022847124,0.0003653241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896216,0.000048061775,0.00057076575,0.00017627316,0.0000147048995,0.00022805209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014078207,0.0002487045,0.00062459,0.00007690412,0.000041327967,0.0000496072,0.00036355437,0.00023168948,0.00016101047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051751176,0.00023580463,0.00012149317,0.00026781624,0.000025873409,0.0005181163,0.0000791591,0.0003733615,0.00003769753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011219724,0.00013642696,0.84764236,0.00023472647,0.00027681186,0.00001661815,0.0018892882,0.0072542047,0.00045372662,0.10334903,0.037782513,0.00085208996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089153455,0.0000700697,0.987471,0.000023208186,0.000008908963,0.000006672741,0.00077342644,0.000627165,0.0007118644,0.0015903352,0.007345771,0.00048003293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18522355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41420308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22897953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004989554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013025505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9615834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982433167","doi":"10.1111/agec.12534","title":"Trade‐offs in the performance of alternative farming systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Sustainability; Livelihood; Organic farming; Food systems; Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Business; Intensive farming; Urban agriculture; Ecological farming; Scale (ratio); Economics; Integrated farming; Sustainable agriculture; Agricultural economics; Environmental economics; Food security; Geography; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.011012686911183548,"score_gpt":0.1759883260355889,"score_spread":0.16497563912440535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982433167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996105,0.00013802706,3.112863e-8,0.0007997873,0.00019666825,0.0005107622,0.00001761959,0.00001363502,0.0022184537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935204,0.00007649524,0.000003991372,0.00008532907,0.00014886276,0.000021907952,0.00003994814,5.025622e-7,0.00027092677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999002,0.000082486695,0.00033407437,0.00024266576,0.00008929766,0.00024947122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994912,0.0002098002,0.00015864814,0.00007013902,0.00003617197,0.000034051813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028280602,0.00014828969,0.0002440169,0.000007870776,0.0000607409,0.00005254508,0.00041621274,0.0000795088,0.00003241121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009917555,0.000037910715,0.000102399244,0.00022551988,0.000035189503,0.00025638955,0.000039971477,0.0001512014,0.000024584615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015141268,0.00071077613,0.8503701,0.00030580806,0.00013345257,0.000007765691,0.008431213,0.010670067,0.08035858,0.022777788,0.002614164,0.023468869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015591316,0.0002393612,0.9808218,0.000021253943,0.0000074371146,0.00001622085,0.0096991705,0.00060713675,0.0009275265,0.00005111884,0.007258866,0.00019418355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004536754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021982379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13045171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007562023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005902624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1545954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982563470","doi":"10.1111/agec.12529","title":"Comparative advantage and agricultural trade","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative advantage; Agriculture; Economics; International trade; Welfare; Agricultural productivity; Productivity; Trade barrier; International economics; Agricultural economics; Economic growth; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.0337024190152891,"score_gpt":0.1941971446126028,"score_spread":0.1604947255973137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982563470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.905048,0.0009617986,0.0000038993903,0.0012281056,0.00061932125,0.0003577636,0.00019918272,0.00006197175,0.09151995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967917,0.00059288606,0.00038347032,0.00036403546,0.00014575923,0.000016227033,0.00010620423,0.000014781117,0.0015849228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819005,0.0000102361955,0.0006760455,0.0006491987,0.000016220287,0.00045827343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916136,0.000050658342,0.00034979408,0.00023977179,0.000011426965,0.00018700838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013388762,0.00032255356,0.0007424473,0.00006937275,0.000108715,0.00018576623,0.00026983814,0.00015680189,0.000306524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069949547,0.0002760521,0.00017360237,0.000112590074,0.00006555188,0.0008664176,0.0000937158,0.00020806449,0.0027142046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034691548,0.000130359,0.088101,0.0000680506,0.00029567597,0.0000023051482,0.0016161785,0.0009856762,0.0006416394,0.90214086,0.0056870757,0.00029648567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014600508,0.00018164316,0.9103248,0.000017998547,0.000016733642,0.0000976318,0.0038782698,0.00073079404,0.0004793292,0.009053773,0.07268878,0.0010701622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055071494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040014824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016871866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007949491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026822395","doi":"10.1111/agec.12592","title":"Nudging farmers in crop choice using price information: Evidence from Ethiopian Commodity Exchange","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Economics; Crop; Agricultural economics; Agribusiness; Agriculture; Forestry; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.05248158512182153,"score_gpt":0.23397400936045892,"score_spread":0.1814924242386374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026822395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907341,0.0003818951,0.000009704611,0.007848875,0.00020033715,0.00034193447,0.000085274194,0.000087190805,0.00031067609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697,0.0005389116,0.00025040773,0.001471607,0.00056768616,0.000012277501,0.00016393972,0.0000010394753,0.000024104775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984267,0.000087221175,0.0004992004,0.0003993921,0.00014497885,0.0004425291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989607,0.0003420515,0.0002799692,0.00006429037,0.00008444571,0.00026856648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013197296,0.00028129693,0.00033616344,0.00001127456,0.00029333396,0.00023124709,0.0005721553,0.00018543006,0.00022439485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015929391,0.00010255992,0.0001279917,0.00040799883,0.00007014283,0.0021256309,0.00022765384,0.00035851213,0.00014863987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032776874,0.0002658595,0.47906768,0.00023830478,0.00015657286,0.00004042433,0.023885148,0.031733125,0.2921868,0.0005116841,0.008798072,0.16278856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023102874,0.000093880044,0.9742104,0.000091062066,0.000015966467,0.000009257307,0.0030730253,0.0030323428,0.0012064661,0.000036502563,0.0174706,0.00052950805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048433254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002386667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49514267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017813426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000160661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7321691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042209942","doi":"10.1111/agec.12587","title":"Eliciting farmers’ subjective probabilities, risk, and uncertainty preferences using contextualized field experiments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Queen's University; James Hutton Institute","keywords":"Incentive; Context (archaeology); Certainty; Economics; Estimation; Econometrics; Field (mathematics); Risk aversion (psychology); Actuarial science; Field experiment; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Statistics; Mathematics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.13102869100858286,"score_gpt":0.22876671138110427,"score_spread":0.09773802037252141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042209942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99449354,0.0006063167,0.00024088331,0.00040091164,0.0001387169,0.00035539793,0.0001236239,0.000032379572,0.003608207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979987,0.00048501012,0.00075043866,0.000521055,0.000113493916,0.000027389928,0.000040723156,0.000012785036,0.000050376944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986459,0.000028814595,0.00056186365,0.00050667085,0.000015316711,0.0002414605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992203,0.00009693978,0.0004405601,0.00010348255,0.000010741589,0.000127959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017669807,0.00020312711,0.0003858023,0.00002897638,0.00018188047,0.00009766014,0.00013076594,0.00010259206,0.00026838784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102444275,0.00019344181,0.00008872992,0.000051467716,0.00006794908,0.00043766535,0.00009548618,0.00014475796,0.00009497925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012222271,0.00009367844,0.92490613,0.00007394759,0.00035459487,8.573318e-7,0.015725704,0.009839493,0.000687512,0.04005128,0.00034920394,0.0077953963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007718213,0.0013862604,0.737011,0.00009312727,0.00014040631,0.000030139374,0.06892054,0.09676373,0.0056593693,0.07091664,0.007806234,0.0035543116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014051462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050657083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18789507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022035657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010768279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7888328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121410940","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00109.x","title":"Consumption effects of genetic modification: what if consumers are right?<sup>⋆</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Labelling; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Product (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Ranking (information retrieval); Production (economics); Economic surplus; Business; Chemistry","score_opus":0.019541467804942567,"score_gpt":0.19825222795501307,"score_spread":0.1787107601500705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121410940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963035,0.0011671584,0.00001176553,0.00044108037,0.0004115219,0.00036099923,0.0000030705746,0.000076549026,0.0012243678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977261,0.0014090932,0.000077478115,0.00022590824,0.0002111843,0.00003016694,0.000037117257,0.000015222256,0.00026774604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989422,0.000015564892,0.0004001552,0.00031319118,0.00007866116,0.00025025656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912816,0.00011030439,0.00039039625,0.00023607204,0.00011039642,0.000024692115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000079733516,0.00022473598,0.00028913864,0.0001108508,0.00015438374,0.00031835292,0.00021915497,0.00009929853,0.0005867412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029065573,0.00018133914,0.00012784833,0.00015705895,0.000082957224,0.0015435236,0.00007890289,0.000113468814,0.0005630051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007342943,0.0005357966,0.76569253,0.0025252413,0.00039993913,0.000041283078,0.0010011701,0.005005947,0.0025949639,0.0054197186,0.010224072,0.20648594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010995219,0.0000116031115,0.97006065,0.00021674468,0.00034817218,0.000019791032,0.00081918197,0.014890584,0.00046514114,0.00019567429,0.011256088,0.0006168454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011655255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003307707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2058691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046369132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037342422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7394796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136353281","doi":"10.1111/agec.12618","title":"Drivers of farm commercialization in Nigeria and Tanzania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Subsistence agriculture; Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Cash crop; Economics; Productivity; Panel data; Business; Factor market; Agricultural science; Economic growth; Geography; Market economy; Marketing","score_opus":0.01732728608662842,"score_gpt":0.21015230012791272,"score_spread":0.1928250140412843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136353281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958684,0.00013069702,5.557808e-7,0.0017795177,0.000085998116,0.00008425533,0.000027203974,0.000012686354,0.0020107045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986907,0.0005411489,0.00014201655,0.0001369315,0.00006288338,0.0000043916266,0.00021745302,4.2058076e-7,0.00020402117],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993418,0.000041324245,0.00026836808,0.00018532824,0.000037744612,0.00012546734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995593,0.00011401505,0.00015312487,0.000028572313,0.00010934007,0.000035685134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008472437,0.00009753129,0.00016769022,0.000007964437,0.000079160025,0.000055356926,0.000079365884,0.00007760381,0.0001617312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003196881,0.000036032958,0.000036375823,0.00034581235,0.000032792217,0.0002689985,0.000056508954,0.0000721498,0.000004638357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003352724,0.00024034646,0.23030382,0.0000320096,0.00006048585,0.000008322849,0.00096457725,0.0001933864,0.6489011,0.032345444,0.0011786226,0.08573836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014449061,0.000045639354,0.97736526,0.0000141916935,0.0000069913494,0.000020403417,0.0037577366,0.000029745619,0.006880188,0.00038738566,0.011183216,0.00016474254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019955114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070372517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74706143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002603319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062165486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39269516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196765117","doi":"10.1111/agec.12674","title":"Bargaining power and risk from substitutability between products attributes the case of specialty eggs in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining power; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Negotiation; Profit maximization; Economics; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Profit (economics); Investment (military); Supply chain; Downstream (manufacturing); Business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Operations management","score_opus":0.016195929157390702,"score_gpt":0.18160616813725128,"score_spread":0.16541023897986057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196765117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885012,0.0031932504,0.0000022323463,0.0012120301,0.00032809374,0.00021951048,0.0017710489,0.000008249674,0.0047644125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805313,0.0012412085,0.00024296732,0.00006626924,0.00020401491,0.000009768286,0.00013786223,0.000010133262,0.000034641525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801564,0.000047589372,0.000963039,0.00063136395,0.000016473052,0.0003259192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843484,0.00042996692,0.0005779616,0.00037839828,0.00007314995,0.00010567403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046412574,0.00023449845,0.00067049207,0.000035220695,0.00013714578,0.00008154244,0.00022549523,0.00010586693,0.00009831687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002505953,0.00017885813,0.000091697526,0.00020065722,0.000077092,0.00034669,0.0001682886,0.0002966648,0.0000143444195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011528916,0.000034078756,0.9807645,0.000014533468,0.00019711722,0.000052141317,0.00048257114,0.00017435836,0.00002186376,0.016716605,0.00072721875,0.0008035038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004239396,0.000018821167,0.98415065,0.000011138235,0.000023719538,0.000059157486,0.0017728595,0.000044702407,0.0006985,0.009314493,0.0031608217,0.00032118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59486693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89367604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2988091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043651788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020417056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7293623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234509913","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00182.x","title":"Short‐term employment transitions of the Canadian labour force: rural‐urban differences in underemployment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Underemployment; Disadvantage; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Rural area; Unemployment; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.015174051815954173,"score_gpt":0.18900529577830935,"score_spread":0.17383124396235516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234509913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907682,0.000033791486,1.1780659e-7,0.008171291,0.00013345218,0.00043003564,0.00006518625,0.000016886881,0.0003810149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993297,0.000045211906,0.000010997257,0.00013681906,0.000047700018,0.000029235987,0.000055255532,8.450414e-7,0.00034423126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989359,0.000036092162,0.0003590565,0.00020812846,0.000091395625,0.00036945098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996502,0.000029071258,0.00006402081,0.000068941394,0.00004991207,0.00013786991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010412867,0.00017403548,0.00021832458,0.000016317887,0.00028506704,0.000066662484,0.00035436498,0.00010221174,0.000059238595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007612522,0.000055493616,0.00013572327,0.00025413418,0.00008898416,0.00017450086,0.000046694127,0.00012542072,0.000004135594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001277949,0.00014156761,0.96822315,0.000017175815,0.000037658017,0.000002111768,0.0013172504,0.00019623947,0.0070359884,0.01821049,0.00016551299,0.00464009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001479113,0.000047096295,0.99353653,0.000025307652,0.000005949802,0.0000025580382,0.0014659388,0.0000019766965,0.0009598622,0.0034094257,0.00022005608,0.00017740065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06526246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.778214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7129515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064628094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007031862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.940962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236007274","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00025.x","title":"Strategies and impact of agro‐allied parastatals reform in Nigeria","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Business; Restructuring; Profitability index; Agribusiness; Liberalization; Agriculture; Economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.018077620037076296,"score_gpt":0.24422499809402656,"score_spread":0.22614737805695026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236007274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99278235,0.0001644845,1.9388385e-7,0.0010587004,0.00003154872,0.00021516785,0.00002066676,0.000021612412,0.0057052732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770606,0.0015962941,0.00004169844,0.000017197824,0.00007573032,0.000012389623,0.00015862953,7.4753143e-7,0.00039125406],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989027,0.00002959244,0.000357889,0.00026701306,0.00007847323,0.00036432725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995999,0.00006820346,0.000119450226,0.000040888,0.0000558023,0.000115785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014446411,0.00019578957,0.00029879014,0.000018770266,0.000079845595,0.000118263306,0.00020406418,0.000114664304,0.00021824171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007045549,0.00005456356,0.000105003965,0.0002916418,0.000065550936,0.00062985806,0.000089454465,0.00012626043,0.0000263205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005113881,0.00049676583,0.36270946,0.00006059681,0.0003126359,0.000048122656,0.0012859068,0.0004870668,0.47283334,0.016444234,0.0037889443,0.14102153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018133115,0.00019661279,0.99220914,0.000015957457,0.0000028244833,0.000036573427,0.0048355567,0.000010969325,0.0006169261,0.00082761794,0.0008620866,0.00020439058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020395727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005979293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6294997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001619643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023204628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33365858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238949084","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00023.x","title":"The social cost of labor in rural development: job creation benefits re‐examined","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Payroll; Economics; Labour economics; Unemployment; Subsidy; Wage; Job creation; Labor demand; Secondary labor market; Productivity; Labor relations; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.02070155784863863,"score_gpt":0.23102739477727352,"score_spread":0.21032583692863488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238949084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887741,0.00019017184,1.5834462e-7,0.007254244,0.00009821178,0.0003792737,0.00001924595,0.000026382819,0.0032581775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471873,0.001122293,0.00003907961,0.00006175872,0.00022645084,0.000057471192,0.00024774426,0.0000011610655,0.0035253055],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986108,0.000057615835,0.00050195254,0.00022670308,0.000154095,0.00044885624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999347,0.0002111918,0.00017729019,0.00004055649,0.00014507081,0.000078895464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027782196,0.0001960129,0.00023757204,0.0000158295,0.0005468348,0.000104758285,0.00040241188,0.00014552505,0.00013091379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003248703,0.000056120614,0.00008312632,0.0005037058,0.00007802563,0.00026160732,0.00010913525,0.00016073725,0.00007112186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023292306,0.00017703927,0.12978137,0.0000147016235,0.00008986222,0.000004768907,0.0013355232,0.00007662232,0.02111628,0.009475334,0.0075431466,0.83015245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020560787,0.00003950162,0.9568991,0.000019084098,0.0000038966236,0.000006756056,0.0026595653,0.000010701111,0.0013774205,0.00009331177,0.038487393,0.00019765107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031878383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010250114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8299548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014048177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025078134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5719804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239984144","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00250.x","title":"Current issues in the economics of agriculture, food, and resources: reshaping agriculture's contributions to society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Agriculture; Political science; Agricultural economics; Economy; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.025079108289422225,"score_gpt":0.2561616326543721,"score_spread":0.23108252436494986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239984144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97364,0.0021323836,0.0000026091257,0.0225484,0.00015080087,0.00068807864,0.00035646153,0.000041004037,0.0004402351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954189,0.002510099,0.00030708493,0.0007794669,0.00055205537,0.000085279564,0.0002895577,0.000001813185,0.00005573463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815416,0.00008688688,0.00069559686,0.00049890904,0.00011839071,0.00044604324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881506,0.000299139,0.00038962803,0.00010880472,0.00025474204,0.00013262087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047222525,0.00034123092,0.0004117354,0.000022501294,0.00043416582,0.0002783318,0.0005324373,0.00018646453,0.000020722926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088149216,0.000105185056,0.00021394053,0.00082001573,0.000111458685,0.0006415956,0.00016320986,0.00036696484,0.000016497053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028230133,0.0025407742,0.012009311,0.0002742958,0.00081202394,0.0000071440595,0.027540429,0.016681807,0.3191061,0.4718132,0.09043293,0.058499664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009922021,0.0009537407,0.48960674,0.00021022116,0.00009581035,0.00011561527,0.02262079,0.000017053764,0.008776885,0.0065699145,0.4688832,0.0011578508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008424291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054233465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47759742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016716131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015552547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4289322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252967254","doi":"10.1016/s0169-5150(01)00078-0","title":"Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Productivity model; Nonparametric statistics; Agricultural productivity; Production (economics); Econometrics; Strengths and weaknesses; Economics; Index (typography); Environmental economics; Agriculture; Computer science; Microeconomics; Total factor productivity; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.015911034751527477,"score_gpt":0.27735517003748894,"score_spread":0.26144413528596144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252967254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98870724,0.000022770815,0.0062578493,0.0005187225,0.00009097793,0.000628873,0.00002067617,0.000031873216,0.0037210002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784723,0.00007357586,0.018030591,0.00015289134,0.000068382804,0.000094377596,0.00008704683,0.000011868088,0.0030089656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863416,0.00007860124,0.0002756966,0.00056136446,0.000070112794,0.00038007315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992959,0.000095790216,0.00014818639,0.0003005968,0.000004335325,0.00015517199],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004213544,0.00022534198,0.0002979307,0.000031214666,0.0001759778,0.000047271733,0.00028219778,0.000072880495,0.0012566458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049603455,0.00016901783,0.0002766162,0.00024606037,0.00018262373,0.0005511895,0.00022300586,0.000093947085,0.000107017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020026512,0.0007880164,0.7400716,0.000016682146,0.0010779853,0.0000037617435,0.0013442239,0.11796571,0.032789227,0.0006142132,0.001002408,0.1041259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039129428,0.000117631214,0.9646167,8.172086e-7,0.00029788894,0.000011385441,0.000597267,0.0060732123,0.008939272,0.00186055,0.016696207,0.00039774558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048308092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037466406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22454512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010423064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004117836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253929142","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00220.x","title":"Rural–urban migration and agricultural productivity: the case of Senegal","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Per capita; Agriculture; Earnings; Per capita income; Investment (military); Agricultural productivity; Agricultural economics; Econometric model; Urbanization; Rural area; Economic growth; Geography; Population; Econometrics","score_opus":0.007450209270897426,"score_gpt":0.21753207380630726,"score_spread":0.21008186453540983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253929142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986385,0.00009041147,0.000004163669,0.011770508,0.00018509637,0.00028630072,0.0000171895,0.00003157261,0.0012297581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984164,0.00030782705,0.00010967134,0.00006335039,0.00027269623,0.000009637292,0.000022445543,0.0000033131694,0.0007946537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993623,0.000064306514,0.00020150439,0.0001523013,0.000051842966,0.00016773863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995276,0.000044474244,0.00015001543,0.00009740312,0.00010901299,0.00007154491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021087957,0.00010763227,0.00012876544,0.000017759174,0.00043367152,0.000113844464,0.00010275286,0.00007247333,0.000011247433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055858593,0.000057873753,0.0000565727,0.00016198512,0.00020697495,0.00045207012,0.000026230875,0.00009265491,0.000005665954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022443388,0.00014627751,0.005918447,0.000032199478,0.000103872626,0.00001345504,0.12589449,0.004008684,0.0044421516,0.8499718,0.0026202844,0.006825937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020518804,0.000283126,0.41729164,0.000079206984,0.00022599226,0.0012323187,0.5217938,0.0006054963,0.004011827,0.009321939,0.041610733,0.0014920257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007070359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19929689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84064984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011164597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054311105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383033114","doi":"10.1111/agec.12786","title":"Separability, spillovers, and segmented markets : Evidence from dairy in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Multiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Economics; Uncorrelated; Market segmentation; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Dairy industry; Business; Agricultural economics; Food science","score_opus":0.023295371274147554,"score_gpt":0.20646502691089927,"score_spread":0.18316965563675172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383033114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823447,0.0017544596,0.0000020526334,0.0016875226,0.0005382054,0.00040205754,0.000323387,0.0001118883,0.01283573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922996,0.0061233346,0.00024441432,0.00020451205,0.00016992021,0.000049426246,0.00022430142,0.000021461534,0.0006630212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975749,0.000030139312,0.00091679755,0.00092629914,0.0000256478,0.00052619254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987496,0.0003449993,0.00034641946,0.00035292117,0.000022650958,0.00018341013],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006593114,0.0003311679,0.0006369279,0.00022305615,0.0001036889,0.00018911604,0.00037786536,0.00023908271,0.00018545595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001527285,0.00030770368,0.00014824701,0.00038740147,0.000079187346,0.0010770782,0.0003205589,0.00026254894,0.0010551667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014900517,0.00013341008,0.9533224,0.00009456035,0.00026228174,0.000025409183,0.0021115844,0.00025728458,0.00068486994,0.027465982,0.013859136,0.001634085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006290064,0.000045218207,0.9821985,0.00005760239,0.000008127293,0.000007209474,0.0003713969,0.0004685183,0.00010141449,0.011216009,0.004398588,0.00049842935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045725197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003321737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028876089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027854505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000179004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386308426","doi":"10.1111/agec.12793","title":"Extreme weather and agricultural management decisions among smallholder farmers in rural Thailand and Vietnam","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Cropping; Diversification (marketing strategy); Agriculture; Agricultural diversification; Business; Agricultural economics; Livelihood; Portfolio; Vietnamese; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Finance; Environmental science","score_opus":0.018211424065552713,"score_gpt":0.19392540258605923,"score_spread":0.17571397852050652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386308426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953774,0.00033919484,2.4220935e-7,0.0015413128,0.00016769668,0.0005531041,0.000029193467,0.00013610495,0.0018557272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908542,0.0057347333,0.00008801758,0.00007855999,0.00014126189,0.00006372456,0.00014702471,0.0000024893395,0.002889978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981309,0.00005607185,0.00042661352,0.0006039174,0.00014233962,0.00064013747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992956,0.00019907062,0.00013211815,0.00007441675,0.000039508377,0.00025929062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001907432,0.00038084318,0.0003611463,0.00004147116,0.00037203095,0.00022349771,0.00029750282,0.00018404164,0.00005482121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019690668,0.00012214597,0.00011483501,0.00061434234,0.00016868724,0.0005131198,0.000340383,0.00021387596,0.0000783869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385214,0.00013808798,0.76678115,0.000035362536,0.00012278324,0.00005769368,0.001143774,0.0003557686,0.022754498,0.0022313264,0.0049930816,0.20132262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003606126,0.00007124116,0.98287255,0.000067910245,0.000021822352,0.000042854284,0.013734486,0.00010893407,0.000069974514,0.00021623565,0.0019866724,0.00044673047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027650842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023708653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21609138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006187885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026985226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49809676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403659939","doi":"10.1111/agec.12859","title":"An experimental approach to farmer valuation of African rice genetic resources","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Genetic resources; Economics; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Biotechnology; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.04700876777670465,"score_gpt":0.25365814821059285,"score_spread":0.2066493804338882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403659939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914572,0.00041009687,0.000011766632,0.0007856976,0.00016747024,0.0002975157,0.000051426287,0.00009070608,0.0067280815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974618,0.000034803237,0.0014229756,0.000109253604,0.0004123575,0.000051116196,0.00017995492,0.0000015757568,0.00032615577],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884254,0.00006510876,0.00035688956,0.00040662373,0.000112259375,0.00021655146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995032,0.00010717438,0.000115244526,0.00006643096,0.000093311246,0.00011461705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017400183,0.00018273389,0.00018828655,0.000023932502,0.00015637491,0.0002565213,0.0002958965,0.00008585894,0.00013978437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011446974,0.00006135622,0.000091150825,0.00059664104,0.000035590725,0.0006077414,0.0000535846,0.00010228334,0.00006332825],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026932654,0.00026176727,0.00030195346,0.000019950112,0.000053544245,7.650668e-7,0.0019130874,0.0011510402,0.9642286,0.0047005294,0.0017511328,0.025590725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019626498,0.0014814863,0.7928675,0.00005220055,0.000108942004,0.00010013839,0.036783516,0.0031725047,0.06070392,0.0005949051,0.10271846,0.0012202025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034999108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055018478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90352464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006185231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006460263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25020343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406192156","doi":"10.1111/agec.12873","title":"Factors affecting investments in environmental assets by agricultural machinery cooperatives (CUMAs): Evidence from France","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Business; Agricultural machinery; Agricultural economics; Economics; Natural resource economics; Geography","score_opus":0.014215487404462386,"score_gpt":0.2041307711226591,"score_spread":0.18991528371819671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406192156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947822,0.0015253171,0.0000039535794,0.00074083643,0.0006935552,0.000405507,0.000047030357,0.000053108906,0.001748479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974245,0.00041780912,0.00003213469,0.00060599495,0.00027139208,0.000030334833,0.00038803095,0.000012723828,0.00081711845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851096,0.000019631634,0.0004606406,0.0005788842,0.000054244458,0.00037566875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994169,0.00016604722,0.00021869445,0.0001528531,0.000023502678,0.000022028631],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008116597,0.00040517628,0.00045604163,0.000075491764,0.000350636,0.00043804635,0.00028197604,0.00009867631,0.00013192657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059142854,0.0002752934,0.00012050901,0.00020384009,0.00007478705,0.0022475852,0.00028981504,0.00019138958,0.00013252687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016789743,0.00016118662,0.98184663,0.00003516081,0.00017770086,0.0000014978194,0.00075952325,0.0011410958,0.005188074,0.000595057,0.008686241,0.0013910475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005354118,0.000011774864,0.9898529,0.00008326551,0.000028967776,2.0457753e-7,0.0032055862,0.000783499,0.000636818,0.00008450797,0.0043551363,0.00042193718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012712785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011595453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008006264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002792113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009620825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413958234","doi":"10.1111/agec.70061","title":"Correction to “Implications of Climate‐Smart Agriculture Technology Adoption on Women's Productivity and Food Security in Tanzania”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Food security; Productivity; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Economics; Agricultural productivity; Natural resource economics; Business; Economic growth; Geography; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.0037892102667859678,"score_gpt":0.180580023974466,"score_spread":0.17679081370768002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413958234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98954594,0.000009302552,0.0000065024356,0.0020891882,0.00016623578,0.0002239173,0.000010527599,0.000024199871,0.00792417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999361,0.00012574832,0.00006985865,0.0001202548,0.0000115851,0.00006237409,0.000011737982,0.000002665624,0.00023479355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993004,0.000018220137,0.00016770873,0.00028535657,0.000029549397,0.00019877055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997064,0.000026250565,0.00006956806,0.00014345345,0.000004099426,0.000050219962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009532205,0.00011162753,0.00013914517,0.000055614735,0.00007581215,0.000011622286,0.00009474238,0.00009031285,0.00002677097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035898913,0.00008331776,0.000018856275,0.00033376014,0.00006034881,0.00018011582,0.00012371672,0.00011924883,0.000023472769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016114532,0.0011635339,0.7121418,0.00006259647,0.00006828027,5.3622716e-7,0.0019257251,0.15881844,0.04855145,0.026565775,0.008116612,0.0424241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014141607,0.00019306695,0.99125123,0.000018407429,0.0000046384316,0.0000040127397,0.00041410717,0.00002240765,0.0038745615,0.0015794272,0.002384414,0.00011231881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052317737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013691079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27910942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040706267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003391119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33975998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}