{"meta":{"query_hash":"4c36ea93806d","filters":{"venue":"Agricultural Economics"},"cohort_total":66,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"exported":66,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4c36ea93806d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Agricultural+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1501327737","doi":"10.1111/agec.12323","title":"Quota prices as indicators of comparative advantage in supply‐managed industries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative advantage; Economics; Production (economics); Product (mathematics); Industrial organization; Partial equilibrium; Supply and demand; Microeconomics; Business; General equilibrium theory; International trade","score_opus":0.015717273943948833,"score_gpt":0.22332991759464113,"score_spread":0.2076126436506923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501327737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7097712,0.0006329316,0.22054447,0.0024574422,0.000064381114,0.00017329984,0.0006115722,0.0001197061,0.06562493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956618,0.00004888819,0.0036149586,0.000021894488,0.000011235674,0.000018616074,0.00003596362,0.0000048762067,0.0005816691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962502,0.002147256,0.00018352592,0.0003486638,0.000720377,0.000349923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97357404,0.018192736,0.004850094,0.0012181024,0.0017282711,0.00043680557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007167619,0.00031947214,0.0007115578,0.0020466645,0.00087962515,0.0041566207,0.000979779,0.0012703333,0.004878021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02872856,0.0003966707,0.0006769506,0.0027326064,0.0029852153,0.0050899643,0.0016005893,0.0012587197,0.00017412096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022536326,0.00012562818,0.026585322,0.00012825476,0.00015608342,0.00015046557,0.00081613107,0.14950638,0.0014050417,0.80025995,0.000906004,0.019735415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005020158,0.00020745669,0.03925781,0.000075241136,0.000084359825,0.00010870057,0.00094201736,0.4425432,0.0013841867,0.51131225,0.00392991,0.000104648025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010819704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008221633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010819704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006172928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018672628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044787943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1954813849","doi":"10.1111/agec.12196","title":"The effects of fair trade on coffee growers: a framework and analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Coquitlam College","funders":"","keywords":"Fair trade; Economics; Production (economics); Welfare; Consumer welfare; Agricultural economics; Business; International trade; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.011456456894175019,"score_gpt":0.2166809350717009,"score_spread":0.20522447817752587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1954813849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42248294,0.0061077536,0.13777927,0.028451094,0.00040293223,0.00042063455,0.00059659145,0.0001334516,0.4036254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865933,0.0009598084,0.0028633745,0.000318165,0.00014920172,0.00007702685,0.000024302937,0.000007980242,0.009006768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982844,0.0008903892,0.000037731068,0.00017416962,0.00020752466,0.0004057683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995076,0.0034691785,0.00070623413,0.00021429248,0.00024254907,0.00029166878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034965435,0.0006625273,0.0009834564,0.0013868674,0.002089296,0.00449816,0.0010569859,0.0035640786,0.013110008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005757816,0.0003667411,0.0012497492,0.00086935295,0.0057533826,0.003221884,0.0034317821,0.002357393,0.00029509945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005864765,0.00014685793,0.0021967443,0.000071476665,0.000049920123,0.00046157718,0.00032155498,0.043702357,0.0005424655,0.9468607,0.0014262978,0.004161548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006807639,0.0001844597,0.0042599738,0.00009494836,0.00011476258,0.0001291582,0.0012716284,0.11974852,0.00028634677,0.8657095,0.008081728,0.000050880488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01214265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009198512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013110008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037744415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019286639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043857336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972019741","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00033.x","title":"Agricultural taxation in developing countries: a survey of issues and policy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Agriculture; Developing country; Revenue; Context (archaeology); Tax revenue; Economics; Public economics; Tax policy; Agricultural policy; Business; Economic policy; Agricultural economics; Economic growth; Tax reform; Finance","score_opus":0.02220441961617818,"score_gpt":0.27847544391242546,"score_spread":0.25627102429624726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972019741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7231799,0.19531038,0.0007941004,0.029756106,0.0001816254,0.000069350404,0.0012672611,0.000023146196,0.049418133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863991,0.1326118,0.000459677,0.0011590355,0.000069226735,0.000017333723,0.00036330635,0.000006512605,0.0013221626],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989241,0.00045835695,0.00014305893,0.00007234714,0.00022946596,0.00017270165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533683,0.0021297783,0.0012668389,0.00012567856,0.0008192399,0.00032171802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027998139,0.0001778884,0.00031717902,0.0030841068,0.0010383327,0.0025461523,0.00023826712,0.00053750153,0.0022950012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005708816,0.00020154977,0.00014166899,0.009992269,0.0010754254,0.0015909137,0.00079709676,0.0007803861,0.0001843884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035849225,0.00024960862,0.40789557,0.0032187044,0.00010456995,0.001413385,0.023541475,0.0030724017,0.0013136013,0.09350563,0.03239423,0.43293244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002416787,0.00018233464,0.41536635,0.0039821616,0.0000445739,0.0014767558,0.037902832,0.0008004925,0.00078110356,0.0058500003,0.53354394,0.00004522323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008364891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054483344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008364891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030582803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002901397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022189498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972477706","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00363.x","title":"Fractional integration in agricultural futures price volatilities revisited","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Economics; Leverage (statistics); Econometrics; Heteroscedasticity; Financial economics; Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.012965744163621812,"score_gpt":0.20114962576753068,"score_spread":0.18818388160390886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972477706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86568403,0.0033272249,0.118366174,0.0021091187,0.00008354907,0.000025538708,0.00011693059,0.00020567785,0.010081634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650383,0.00025723988,0.0026360864,0.000057612295,0.000050632865,0.000003300522,0.000025093788,0.000016481472,0.00044979315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823856,0.0004785548,0.0001729987,0.00036484195,0.0004950542,0.00024998302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220396,0.011960266,0.003088445,0.0014204184,0.0010061546,0.00032086088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007013891,0.00048978964,0.0010010074,0.0020192338,0.0006667369,0.0023902967,0.0010819868,0.0013425141,0.002012378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03580096,0.00042687103,0.0012933594,0.0017341528,0.00212086,0.0037704469,0.0016496817,0.0026406152,0.00012759081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009058129,0.0002211736,0.17261605,0.00035046897,0.00065429474,0.0049176365,0.0040972843,0.1530081,0.022605907,0.4191582,0.0015330558,0.21993195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040592757,0.0001634304,0.08677132,0.00013321472,0.00020459038,0.0018806471,0.00056144415,0.5860569,0.008062386,0.31308588,0.002908544,0.00013104477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006901305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002546724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007013891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013771115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000604959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0370934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974564431","doi":"10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.001","title":"Current issues in the economics of agriculture, food, and resources: reshaping agriculture's contributions to society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Economics; Agricultural economics; Food systems; Natural resource economics; Current (fluid); Food security; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.016428503090757836,"score_gpt":0.2351350685702321,"score_spread":0.21870656547947426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974564431","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01479102,0.078840636,0.0024522815,0.8578075,0.0038089938,0.0000072585312,0.00006132005,0.000036237772,0.042194802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65711105,0.18330151,0.0050485516,0.08728649,0.03083982,0.000061065926,0.000113342765,0.00007838141,0.036159825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817646,0.0009215524,0.000055178174,0.00019931974,0.0003674753,0.00027998496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898351,0.0063241743,0.00045591802,0.0005112027,0.0016061726,0.0012674285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009796492,0.00052101066,0.00063346827,0.0013731899,0.0036893247,0.009735594,0.0023410243,0.008468415,0.017434346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011086821,0.00023620045,0.0003934893,0.002596728,0.018853676,0.015266432,0.002726232,0.004287125,0.0015692576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058199046,0.000063436906,0.0010537461,0.00018898545,0.000011851829,0.000048594255,0.0015871838,0.00062004547,0.00023003203,0.8670567,0.052536767,0.0765444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017194225,0.000026429314,0.0027129264,0.000359458,0.000009093502,0.00006731773,0.0058892053,0.0004974657,0.00011459073,0.57312894,0.41716078,0.000016543507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049275677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011900922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017434346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004423982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064128507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05832374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977985440","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00404.x","title":"Who trades water allocations? Evidence of the characteristics of early adopters in the Goulburn–Murray Irrigation District, Australia 1998–1999**","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Australian Research Council; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Early adopter; Logit; Productivity; Value (mathematics); Agriculture; Water trading; Irrigation district; Economics; Agricultural economics; Irrigation; Business; Water conservation; Economic growth; Econometrics; Geography; Marketing","score_opus":0.018209155015083946,"score_gpt":0.1971744123807778,"score_spread":0.17896525736569385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977985440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997042,0.000015851545,0.000023353365,0.000034574387,2.9767034e-7,0.0000019796498,0.000014141573,2.515285e-7,0.00020534535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995395,0.000026258953,0.0000321729,0.000011448779,8.5136065e-7,0.000002401443,0.000022156712,3.232797e-7,0.0003649208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999426,0.00014281097,0.000041502768,0.00010054006,0.00014419868,0.00014500401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992789,0.0015370727,0.0040791836,0.00028392344,0.00069234695,0.0006185097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009885889,0.00010374771,0.0002115656,0.0005840899,0.00050692406,0.00095120113,0.0005449854,0.0004200996,0.00158764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004692687,0.0002458111,0.00014247966,0.0007686518,0.00079836504,0.0007374121,0.0007534767,0.0006702649,0.00021722545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036397756,0.00007919482,0.9890975,0.000013288862,0.000014820147,0.0001717952,0.0053600743,0.00010607073,0.0007357188,0.000115472765,0.00008499063,0.004184734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014997964,0.000036744532,0.99519557,0.00000609377,0.0000040475124,0.00005841158,0.0041228603,0.00024597708,0.00009555488,0.000027061309,0.00020216857,0.0000040916198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058984384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12512416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058984384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006725518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004948308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11728215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991061614","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00575.x","title":"Short‐run and long‐run dynamics of farm land allocation: panel data evidence from Denmark<sup>1</sup>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Danish; Agriculture; Economics; Estimation; Agricultural economics; Econometrics; Capital (architecture); Agricultural land; Temperate climate; Natural resource economics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.07885542108199786,"score_gpt":0.22748869185044698,"score_spread":0.14863327076844912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991061614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99459827,0.00032751434,0.0014130784,0.00016373413,0.0000061416727,0.0000054716406,0.002554946,0.000010779597,0.00092006085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961759,0.00017066977,0.0003407306,0.000019325564,0.000002498655,0.0000047706108,0.0027654956,0.0000039490205,0.0005167492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931204,0.00025016355,0.00006225299,0.00018742101,0.00007681993,0.000111223344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957093,0.0026431466,0.0008561688,0.00037105926,0.00028454085,0.00013583977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016525593,0.00023320901,0.0005842965,0.00038782755,0.0003970607,0.0013544752,0.00045612323,0.0004887037,0.0019547942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028376144,0.00041492758,0.00064136507,0.001057769,0.00038345717,0.0005634084,0.0005110786,0.00047853714,0.00047097614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077303196,0.0002021444,0.7975704,0.00023207818,0.0011941537,0.0004233604,0.0008738998,0.17718846,0.0020774477,0.004351883,0.0035536045,0.011559607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055984292,0.00014503437,0.9162825,0.00007781728,0.00035128125,0.00008869909,0.0015608107,0.07165741,0.001742451,0.0019341935,0.006027636,0.000076311146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12531117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12984693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12531117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011577939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006405721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24916357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003608996","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00139.x","title":"The political economy of farmland ownership regulations and land prices","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Economic rent; Economics; Instrumental variable; Ordinary least squares; Value (mathematics); Acre; Agricultural land; Variable (mathematics); Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Land tenure; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Geography; Agricultural science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00979913655567014,"score_gpt":0.17924070041703238,"score_spread":0.16944156386136225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003608996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95608646,0.00032067834,0.0013532812,0.002675117,0.000015572323,0.000017786511,0.00025409777,0.000009700256,0.039267275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998771,0.00006692997,0.000041335745,0.000056112323,0.00000465189,0.0000024043245,0.000025735408,0.0000011049366,0.0010307273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991259,0.00037382075,0.000024454335,0.00007153543,0.00017534316,0.00022897188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995216,0.0020167974,0.0017531799,0.00013889126,0.0006657123,0.00020947709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088102504,0.00005517997,0.0001707228,0.0004392174,0.00055816944,0.0019963498,0.00017880925,0.0003497949,0.0041006086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046649612,0.00015064927,0.00009866925,0.0008344122,0.0017788318,0.00047459386,0.00044537953,0.0005564616,0.0002258313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035479048,0.0002893397,0.59598494,0.00010430662,0.00023355735,0.0008809656,0.0016058409,0.04618073,0.0051934705,0.30830058,0.009196683,0.03167478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058264577,0.00007069061,0.91669977,0.000041973046,0.000044357617,0.00006520676,0.0033825454,0.023812508,0.0013674079,0.037413523,0.017009597,0.000034142693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08876661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15022035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08876661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005854541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026070052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17649984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006387614","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00223.x","title":"Transaction costs, strategic interaction, and farm restructuring","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Transaction cost; Business; Industrial organization; Vertical integration; Software deployment; Czech; Agriculture; Process (computing); Database transaction; Outcome (game theory); Organizational architecture; Strategic Choice; Microeconomics; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.019360171740765743,"score_gpt":0.2109857593471077,"score_spread":0.19162558760634196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006387614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9399979,0.001027919,0.011693006,0.0020479215,0.000019391346,0.00008541278,0.00020368242,0.00001964878,0.04490502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915576,0.0000634873,0.00022493482,0.000013173046,0.000005069893,0.000009284966,0.000018390387,0.000001157279,0.00050875015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982029,0.0007697673,0.000092360046,0.000102279875,0.0004422236,0.00039046234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778935,0.014733424,0.004633434,0.0008009358,0.0011045359,0.0008340886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019564368,0.00022212495,0.00033540337,0.0014485181,0.00067549193,0.002313619,0.00046797667,0.000752575,0.0093691265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013545612,0.00015869869,0.00021056019,0.0016483315,0.0017808769,0.0022285231,0.0010487485,0.00076408597,0.00018015955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060905726,0.00063143653,0.1851291,0.00031262595,0.00021207615,0.0011480078,0.0016956185,0.12871176,0.0017824547,0.61546355,0.0032144948,0.061089892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014479908,0.00034215595,0.2888843,0.00014843447,0.00013340407,0.00073496404,0.006345576,0.14773788,0.00085318607,0.5454188,0.009138445,0.00011797808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044565783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004455233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093691265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027444542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009766025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031342864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022502738","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00557.x","title":"Measuring the cost of liquidity in agricultural futures markets: Conventional and Bayesian approaches","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign","keywords":"Futures contract; Market liquidity; Econometrics; Estimator; Bayesian probability; Economics; Futures market; Covariance; Financial economics; Statistics; Mathematics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05666833486824902,"score_gpt":0.18000617849663286,"score_spread":0.12333784362838385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022502738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843594,0.0007484745,0.11160869,0.00037705444,0.000016236927,0.000062609826,0.00030555396,0.000057101734,0.002464807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97909,0.00017888893,0.020239303,0.00002455597,0.000022199918,0.000039662304,0.0001243836,0.000010791192,0.0002703539],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960264,0.0019957558,0.00018493719,0.0002782558,0.0013812777,0.0001333639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95432484,0.035750918,0.0055392385,0.0016716734,0.0022318414,0.0004814977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008162558,0.0005688461,0.00063044165,0.0022735146,0.00030663455,0.0014851573,0.0008035865,0.000911729,0.0011599316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047877327,0.00040134363,0.00035751265,0.0019741547,0.00092818803,0.0035264888,0.0015305162,0.00069513434,0.00009926162],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015541255,0.000481408,0.25263163,0.00033579982,0.0006261084,0.00032911726,0.0005508763,0.5645379,0.009396369,0.061275832,0.0008477444,0.107433215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065575296,0.00041586766,0.087217525,0.000071954884,0.000073157884,0.0003072024,0.00020713611,0.86520296,0.0046713916,0.04110056,0.0005420777,0.00012465028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027200216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035322206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008162558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013623864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006718052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043168247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024535721","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00353.x","title":"Implications of high food prices for poverty in Pakistan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Food prices; Almost ideal demand system; Subsidy; Incentive; Agricultural economics; Food policy; Rural area; Rural poverty; Agriculture; Food security; Economic growth; Geography; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.025047153123225453,"score_gpt":0.21225317946036026,"score_spread":0.18720602633713482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024535721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98836565,0.0004426367,0.0007130701,0.0014098943,0.000024752415,0.000012824642,0.00077556795,0.0000108517115,0.00824478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994735,0.00019725472,0.00005491777,0.00003279959,0.0000073237447,0.0000019877941,0.00007274237,6.6876134e-7,0.00015894242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966073,0.000095200514,0.0000131065535,0.000031400446,0.000073880445,0.00012570195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888617,0.00039241283,0.00043616357,0.000027354392,0.00016375816,0.000094178235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055116165,0.00020743623,0.0001863453,0.0005596181,0.00067879795,0.0016095135,0.000171941,0.0004278671,0.002486473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014579396,0.00017690295,0.00034349595,0.00085360836,0.00057953026,0.00085698516,0.00071147544,0.00063910463,0.00017357443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038933833,0.0001945898,0.8889147,0.00018117658,0.0001832065,0.0032813193,0.00083170756,0.045096498,0.00088396523,0.014948039,0.0071140393,0.037981298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047798683,0.00041143017,0.93053454,0.00009299169,0.00012394086,0.0012698747,0.007003274,0.037315562,0.0017810647,0.014256843,0.0071083945,0.00005432409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020694062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017093536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020694062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001738751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009011805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041147232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038508384","doi":"10.1111/agec.12072","title":"Residual demand measures of market power of Russian wheat exporters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect competition; Economics; Market power; Price elasticity of demand; Competition (biology); Residual; Instrumental variable; Heteroscedasticity; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01635739447938146,"score_gpt":0.1688505875621962,"score_spread":0.15249319308281475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038508384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996566,0.000041662784,0.0005817814,0.000032099866,0.0000015819102,0.0000046167697,0.0003068831,0.00000572425,0.0024597812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907506,0.00001773368,0.00009620644,0.000004610102,0.0000033058964,0.0000023460343,0.00038166717,0.0000017084747,0.0004172888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969065,0.000072675706,0.000034355577,0.00008035665,0.00006506115,0.000056987596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977506,0.00093437824,0.00076851423,0.00023225842,0.00018128437,0.00013298157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000782988,0.0001533236,0.00025973658,0.00083216385,0.00015906457,0.0006293578,0.00027645112,0.00028713563,0.0047299806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033968268,0.000085871914,0.0002999104,0.00059062627,0.00043484705,0.0006713226,0.0005307824,0.00030573926,0.00063939433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046304407,0.00014682519,0.9637338,0.0000574449,0.00016550152,0.00028322195,0.001562221,0.0056013516,0.005761737,0.0068439,0.0005933844,0.014787519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147106575,0.00019219269,0.98166656,0.000010894471,0.00003465926,0.0003066913,0.0019113829,0.011048609,0.0010359356,0.002187974,0.0015711882,0.000019286146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020268324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009879665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047299806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025888585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011958067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015823364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051186636","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00409.x","title":"Exporting to new destinations and the effects of tariffs: the case of meat commodities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Liberalization; International economics; Probit model; Free trade; Economics; Estimation; International trade; Destinations; Probit; Business; Agricultural economics; Econometrics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.02513254420435885,"score_gpt":0.1902825911144324,"score_spread":0.16515004691007357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051186636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912156,0.00039956078,0.0040752436,0.00062646973,0.0000154048,0.00004059863,0.0002794621,0.000031210027,0.003316398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974999,0.00021948016,0.0005749786,0.000033861532,0.000013464896,0.000011261464,0.00012587976,0.0000074327186,0.001513687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979371,0.001251158,0.00009719939,0.00022818813,0.00018740945,0.00029907102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91261923,0.069334134,0.012062955,0.002088967,0.0023480235,0.0015466785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061453013,0.00044377078,0.00082003564,0.0015027212,0.00086621044,0.0032541521,0.001207203,0.0013770197,0.013269392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03403881,0.0003711152,0.0014668109,0.0014530615,0.0017700335,0.0021688608,0.0014311172,0.0027671063,0.0009081171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001753342,0.00077678123,0.5327324,0.00016871978,0.0006218444,0.00212275,0.00055067806,0.42757118,0.0011355021,0.016282203,0.0014880107,0.0147965085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000219258,0.0012789663,0.22353154,0.000094867086,0.00075412577,0.00084842154,0.0027022886,0.74403477,0.0022641127,0.021316493,0.002785945,0.00016913643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03732081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019634988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03732081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014810108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006758068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07420719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056499450","doi":"10.1111/agec.12021","title":"Challenges and policy options in the global bio‐economy: introduction and overview","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Economics; Agriculture; Volatility (finance); Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Natural resource economics; Economy; Macroeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02197063440898549,"score_gpt":0.2158772127263667,"score_spread":0.1939065783173812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056499450","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003478364,0.89191633,0.004032459,0.0604789,0.0038072076,0.000056575733,0.00020153403,0.000038552207,0.03599003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027086914,0.9420944,0.002961313,0.010912779,0.0059296,0.00010152097,0.00017390042,0.00002539208,0.010714236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945444,0.0002092405,0.000035574634,0.000076166776,0.000115600094,0.00010895933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992829,0.00043716733,0.00007102016,0.000019138291,0.00012547111,0.00006442718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015860677,0.0016049952,0.0010524729,0.0027264964,0.0013641631,0.0068727774,0.00088798645,0.0066596414,0.0054907664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011169715,0.0004933484,0.0008023068,0.0048315143,0.002466083,0.009188656,0.0026844877,0.004228382,0.0012916003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108080174,0.00027445797,0.0022572326,0.009636307,0.000106457235,0.0010705123,0.002216193,0.009498942,0.0013332973,0.6226568,0.15357982,0.19726194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071944055,0.00008723461,0.001678008,0.003616362,0.000024119037,0.00044173017,0.001963216,0.0007632493,0.00017854916,0.13220583,0.85899794,0.000036532445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004379691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004485098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068727774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036829577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026471815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026721835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059470131","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00556.x","title":"The North American horticultural industry and the risk of plant invasion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Revenue; Monopolistic competition; Profit (economics); Competition (biology); Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Industrial organization; Agricultural economics; Finance; Ecology; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.01303739633804999,"score_gpt":0.17308885133426666,"score_spread":0.16005145499621667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059470131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97268796,0.00036469582,0.013132732,0.0009944927,0.0000106185435,0.000020518279,0.00017291386,0.000040131064,0.012575901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997729,0.00012221304,0.00058388663,0.00002594063,0.000004209582,0.0000038243497,0.000033268872,0.000004064881,0.0014936303],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997013,0.00010919224,0.000006829795,0.000037017067,0.000056544446,0.000089184214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983069,0.0008781698,0.00042737092,0.0000760553,0.00015902404,0.00015255902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095543324,0.00024103759,0.00025689986,0.000506796,0.00058939104,0.001397862,0.0005218496,0.00078533625,0.004149726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030163398,0.00028754192,0.00034527475,0.0004885342,0.0009602746,0.0007929871,0.00045891464,0.00076254125,0.00021812618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012693822,0.000105403116,0.044370383,0.000030344228,0.000050544953,0.00019565762,0.00016432432,0.9003004,0.0011105875,0.04373586,0.0015699501,0.008239588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043792505,0.00011221268,0.040365424,0.000019140343,0.000045332225,0.00016979371,0.00042452762,0.9283155,0.00033985,0.026914379,0.0032091453,0.00004079793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12048187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15150006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12048187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028224706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001722309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2395612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066621112","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00007.x","title":"The economics of coupled farm subsidies under costly and imperfect enforcement","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Subsidy; Public economics; Cheating; Economics; Microeconomics; Deterrence theory; Economic interventionism; Incentive; Agency (philosophy); Imperfect; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.010870769263397414,"score_gpt":0.17304821168550533,"score_spread":0.1621774424221079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066621112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90913445,0.0004335227,0.02949854,0.0041969465,0.000067506764,0.000093252216,0.00021953526,0.00011574511,0.056240592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967528,0.00009102154,0.0005645857,0.00008791832,0.000012652652,0.00001999377,0.000008079861,0.000006490296,0.0024563798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987664,0.0005544588,0.00003704041,0.00013631675,0.00018764446,0.0003181109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996009,0.0022843257,0.00081044127,0.00037481837,0.00025748782,0.00026383364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018527729,0.0002702572,0.000799186,0.00047858641,0.0007159157,0.0020942101,0.00088681496,0.0018074629,0.007649742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006190147,0.00045453096,0.00046546696,0.00048559025,0.0034040583,0.0022158173,0.0018276228,0.000999985,0.00029095422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062221923,0.00044515255,0.004065083,0.00020391698,0.0001298687,0.00074499944,0.00029653838,0.36612025,0.0043367455,0.60622966,0.0032123707,0.013593144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005436351,0.0003701532,0.007430728,0.000060431903,0.000091919086,0.00019354942,0.00053247367,0.30869028,0.00067836937,0.678113,0.0032385173,0.000056945555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053873365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023177445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007649742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034477552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015097096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025590956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075750714","doi":"10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00013.x","title":"Yield and income risk‐efficiency analysis of alternative systems for rice production in the Guinea Savannah of Northern Ghana","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture","funders":"","keywords":"Fertilizer; Agronomy; Cropping system; Cover crop; Sowing; Cropping; Mathematics; Crop; Environmental science; Biology; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.0222828308939257,"score_gpt":0.21674204777362782,"score_spread":0.19445921687970213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075750714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994881,0.000014985521,0.00022756994,0.000009042265,3.973857e-7,0.0000083956675,0.00005357072,0.0000037002978,0.00019418403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994904,0.000016754688,0.000334023,0.00000140806,5.264101e-7,0.000008474069,0.000044077347,0.0000018252991,0.00010257933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997377,0.00012714873,0.000013420716,0.0000334609,0.0000381344,0.00005005029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992223,0.00038653516,0.00019007202,0.000042375545,0.00008308606,0.000075494034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006127575,0.00031500566,0.00027676494,0.000666614,0.00019972229,0.0004791314,0.0003972472,0.0002233595,0.001384935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012277014,0.00018085023,0.0003402879,0.0007490334,0.00033687297,0.00045573252,0.0003354283,0.00015456663,0.00010406041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037547555,0.000556794,0.7309277,0.00036090298,0.00034719455,0.0022221967,0.0012373129,0.16592944,0.035822015,0.0023386236,0.00039504,0.056107994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007901359,0.0016915244,0.87815046,0.000023349847,0.000082672894,0.00019229027,0.0017702914,0.112802476,0.0036029837,0.0007417839,0.0008345407,0.00002865886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021722818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03048038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021722818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00257607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046045796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043192744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087738861","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00269.x","title":"Differentiating the consumer benefits from labeling of GM food products","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Yield (engineering); Food products; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Food science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03203573920005104,"score_gpt":0.19948548032379332,"score_spread":0.16744974112374228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087738861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95208937,0.0010725008,0.012601422,0.0018110044,0.00005187558,0.000058639675,0.0002876862,0.000026510466,0.032000948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654585,0.00028104908,0.0014881184,0.00015238665,0.000026479744,0.000012380555,0.00009014191,0.0000057066654,0.0013978612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889237,0.00052037445,0.00003807847,0.00008595662,0.00039106453,0.00007216754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98316824,0.0139108505,0.001400595,0.0006346088,0.0006866805,0.00019896711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028010856,0.00028786724,0.00027584896,0.0007701475,0.00017978407,0.0014422286,0.00022885008,0.0009731361,0.006954687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010089544,0.00013756042,0.0005501652,0.0005536086,0.00085144676,0.0009859327,0.00058982125,0.0007705267,0.00036878258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041792816,0.0013703911,0.48508662,0.0016614088,0.001296352,0.0012625562,0.0017537425,0.045508835,0.047206543,0.17751767,0.003509809,0.22964682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014446312,0.0012809823,0.7310696,0.00035989512,0.0007051806,0.0011182631,0.0023361172,0.041242607,0.018337049,0.19033623,0.01293964,0.00012992465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006754301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006001024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006954687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060297904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025562206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023265779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088422577","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00227.x","title":"Regional trade agreements and trade in agri‐food products: evidence for the European Union from gravity modeling using disaggregated data","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Gravity model of trade; European union; International trade; International economics; Openness to experience; Economics; Trade barrier; Trade diversion; Trade creation; Regional trade; Free trade; Economic integration; International free trade agreement","score_opus":0.30384079097226957,"score_gpt":0.2697382399669234,"score_spread":0.03410255100534615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088422577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883499,0.0016161378,0.00342038,0.0005720127,0.000019360055,0.0000106527805,0.00093588507,0.00009184843,0.0049837716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974464,0.0004966609,0.00056233007,0.000033141252,0.000014569647,0.0000047899794,0.001127417,0.000012082673,0.0003025021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583817,0.0026272365,0.00020456393,0.0006030068,0.0004864666,0.00024059748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723603,0.016100742,0.0065779346,0.003174475,0.0011812311,0.0006052216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056315977,0.0005007362,0.00090172724,0.002381887,0.00040147873,0.0023604117,0.00061117223,0.00074789755,0.0038158277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016004032,0.00027015802,0.0016752229,0.0065372055,0.0012044642,0.0019468442,0.0024154177,0.0008996856,0.00069286616],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003979601,0.000114357674,0.8722072,0.00015756272,0.0018207825,0.0003839027,0.001319217,0.07004866,0.00029186884,0.013503038,0.0035055524,0.036249984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008241177,0.00026316117,0.8834288,0.00027095067,0.0009495262,0.00024993016,0.003751565,0.08152453,0.0005449629,0.01571707,0.013131703,0.00008550382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014069818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006975168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014069818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059848675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045859322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02978307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089324017","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00252.x","title":"On export rivalry and the greening of agriculture–the role of eco‐labels","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Agriculture; Greening; International trade; Economics; International economics; Race (biology); Business; Microeconomics; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.008333353454829629,"score_gpt":0.15608982043585287,"score_spread":0.14775646698102324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089324017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8675329,0.0068301517,0.0040808665,0.04558253,0.00010507713,0.000021834505,0.000108641274,0.000017065537,0.07572101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961591,0.0012343042,0.00011775629,0.00075098954,0.00013066281,0.0000039698575,0.000016499576,0.0000032632245,0.0015834359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840695,0.0008674114,0.000046894183,0.0001573755,0.00021123554,0.0003101706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697235,0.021230355,0.0061990484,0.0007758212,0.001144845,0.0009265001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032624758,0.00026330308,0.00084185705,0.0012777523,0.0017439314,0.005001734,0.0006524573,0.0031281596,0.014633275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099986205,0.00016027034,0.00047370553,0.0018239703,0.0067110807,0.0049715065,0.00284066,0.0022220523,0.000456993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007115072,0.0006627421,0.11983942,0.00032794644,0.00020809633,0.0015978012,0.0029176523,0.014213421,0.0021159786,0.80959004,0.008598624,0.03921668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016281308,0.00033239694,0.10087814,0.0004390555,0.00022897021,0.00038338348,0.016214278,0.024629228,0.0015665073,0.8231319,0.031883597,0.0001497249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007754796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007035251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014633275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017468726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086705555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048953176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097976094","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00424.x","title":"An error corrected almost ideal demand system for major cereals in Kenya","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Consortium pour la recherche économique en Afrique; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Almost ideal demand system; Economics; Sorghum; Consumption (sociology); Agricultural economics; Error correction model; Econometrics; Price elasticity of demand; Microeconomics; Cointegration; Agronomy; Biology; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.012669966625113934,"score_gpt":0.20426396804225624,"score_spread":0.1915940014171423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097976094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843311,0.00010640049,0.011434517,0.000114215305,0.0000070125207,0.000058674366,0.0020782843,0.00003251289,0.0018372807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491763,0.000040856336,0.0029173547,0.0000117557665,0.0000024746057,0.000026626729,0.0016236758,0.0000040920268,0.00045547663],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988833,0.0005847919,0.000079304125,0.00016131975,0.000165348,0.00012585877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969313,0.0013276262,0.0008964563,0.00021982605,0.0005673161,0.000057437275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020631107,0.00028057428,0.00037476365,0.000988158,0.00039431633,0.00083256245,0.0005790041,0.00049202895,0.0016598104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059874235,0.0002841501,0.0004445543,0.0012761313,0.0004614,0.0006992549,0.00047924538,0.0003729444,0.00024643177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005098812,0.0001552801,0.4441733,0.00019369682,0.00024070973,0.00055598817,0.0005117955,0.5116939,0.001747446,0.017816475,0.001669213,0.020732349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004228425,0.00022286603,0.34179762,0.00006250447,0.000056136898,0.00024170986,0.0008596357,0.6457512,0.0015125463,0.0052983304,0.0040432657,0.000111953625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076477684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04449084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076477684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019463022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009998569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15206504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100682722","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00163.x","title":"The economic costs and benefits of a participatory project to conserve maize landraces on farms in Oaxaca, Mexico<sup>⋆</sup>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Social benefits; Citizen journalism; Cost–benefit analysis; Economics; Business; Value (mathematics); Welfare; Public economics; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Finance; Political science; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04884707338110702,"score_gpt":0.25459415863494744,"score_spread":0.20574708525384042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100682722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994035,0.000010372312,0.00009824406,0.00004011298,6.295509e-7,0.000029094614,0.000019459441,0.0000015945641,0.00039711967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990477,0.00002943307,0.0004249401,0.000007672578,0.0000013898446,0.00006611675,0.000024873145,5.2066207e-7,0.00039729173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991179,0.00049482397,0.000017813058,0.000072422416,0.00010539148,0.00019150933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984158,0.0007466486,0.00034093636,0.00013185535,0.0001368281,0.0002277863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018516075,0.00024824098,0.00016442234,0.00038229482,0.0011337742,0.00045242,0.00045756754,0.00044452993,0.0013802378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021552201,0.00010235332,0.00019088906,0.0004435604,0.0011003037,0.0003272088,0.00088172505,0.00026497172,0.00007767539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010693185,0.0064682704,0.6169987,0.0007938857,0.00045031728,0.00476049,0.012115666,0.0210053,0.08642822,0.005453808,0.0019622305,0.23286992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036656935,0.00942365,0.9580655,0.00009417756,0.00018888441,0.00028681982,0.0136892805,0.00712135,0.006076734,0.0014395273,0.003219033,0.000028486618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016883219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048485417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016883219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002031774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016619429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033569932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105274608","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00620.x","title":"Do stronger intellectual property rights promote seed exchange: evidence from U.S. seed exports?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; European Commission; Science and Engineering Research Board; University of Regina","keywords":"Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Developing country; International trade; Business; TRIPS Agreement; International economics; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09349116824437065,"score_gpt":0.21151163682918567,"score_spread":0.11802046858481502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105274608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99220407,0.000700036,0.00008541723,0.0007812569,0.000010034684,0.000005365072,0.00026356673,0.000003248332,0.005947075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984664,0.0005482394,0.000040231105,0.00010643964,0.000016410753,0.0000022248798,0.00024937373,0.0000014028182,0.0005692991],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958915,0.00019802529,0.0000250899,0.000061718936,0.00007068172,0.000055295117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789595,0.011342776,0.00764532,0.00058629183,0.0008520283,0.0006140972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015137604,0.0001719315,0.00017693467,0.00074260164,0.0004699359,0.00095875614,0.00028054806,0.00042402762,0.0087867305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061759097,0.00009379642,0.00034787136,0.0012785869,0.0008531575,0.00065515726,0.00056229654,0.0005906356,0.00047605892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061846146,0.00046035825,0.9768262,0.00012512562,0.0002124508,0.000470019,0.0005462978,0.00045635813,0.00026790274,0.0018789235,0.0014982077,0.016639762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058828125,0.00018347858,0.9939739,0.0000739608,0.0001572811,0.00010911753,0.0015781231,0.0004568748,0.00045526924,0.0007738082,0.0021726785,0.000006616838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008237882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0099010365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0087867305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032373946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036425184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029394567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116371385","doi":"10.1111/agec.12245","title":"On the nature and magnitude of cost economies in hog production","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economies of scale; Marginal cost; Production (economics); Economics; Unit cost; Function (biology); Unit (ring theory); Scale (ratio); Factor price; Production function; Quadratic equation; Econometrics; Returns to scale; Microeconomics; Agricultural economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010240824747254476,"score_gpt":0.1840847930490585,"score_spread":0.17384396830180404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116371385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98755693,0.00048464042,0.006506348,0.0002737965,0.000007221974,0.000018132023,0.00012436428,0.000015654605,0.005013015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921644,0.00005653303,0.00053069997,0.000011434431,0.0000037558493,0.0000044281737,0.000026929085,0.0000028537402,0.00014686113],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986494,0.00078437297,0.00004786639,0.00012705527,0.00024945894,0.00014196456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794868,0.01718628,0.0017755565,0.0007963276,0.00060223835,0.00015281698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030717843,0.0003802717,0.00036730547,0.00074571517,0.00020543934,0.0013277713,0.00035486813,0.00040457537,0.0017489943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015361994,0.0002582833,0.00065327337,0.0005869527,0.0012701857,0.0012767907,0.00073142565,0.0004790321,0.000069506794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000722899,0.00017165118,0.2865517,0.00037496496,0.00052372075,0.0013507626,0.00047223663,0.5859296,0.008314005,0.06598037,0.0006761439,0.048931945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004255678,0.0002595723,0.7704555,0.000059026792,0.00016570458,0.00036651778,0.0008140343,0.18853045,0.0027232924,0.034664262,0.001847931,0.00007125995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004875066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056967004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004875066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001262636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050258625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016245365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120460765","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00506.x","title":"Transaction costs in milk marketing: a comparison between Canada and Great Britain","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Pooling; Business; Database transaction; Marketing; Industrial organization; Finance","score_opus":0.00988010875852153,"score_gpt":0.18935295257228013,"score_spread":0.1794728438137586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120460765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96988195,0.0024844285,0.00032023946,0.0010261901,0.000015077776,0.000045903187,0.00045171296,0.000011423853,0.025762975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707615,0.00051491684,0.0002008565,0.000046416033,0.000003692266,0.000007345841,0.00015378247,0.000005277757,0.0019915253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971066,0.0005648491,0.000094942974,0.0001903168,0.0012352697,0.0008079809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909355,0.0033979404,0.0012715195,0.00028699954,0.0029564984,0.001151429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017777018,0.00022003749,0.00040175096,0.002560156,0.0022410695,0.0026963018,0.00064696436,0.00037090335,0.0040699327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009802048,0.00016703348,0.00023812383,0.0059815748,0.0015218395,0.00064398383,0.0008954582,0.0004661759,0.00014027397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017483407,0.000244485,0.7455989,0.000700915,0.00026608745,0.0018923162,0.019983308,0.009518401,0.0025856066,0.03857221,0.008111209,0.1707782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000378124,0.000055419667,0.9671892,0.00013317239,0.000051006955,0.00011724849,0.012630623,0.0028358893,0.00034873455,0.0005957937,0.015962044,0.000043001182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97909385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9823344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053973682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053973682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026712917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3916083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130289939","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00014.x","title":"Modeling the demand for alcoholic beverages and advertising specifications","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Dominance (genetics); Economics; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03557117354293129,"score_gpt":0.1977816732846012,"score_spread":0.1622104997416699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130289939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655308,0.0003137902,0.0202835,0.0012324646,0.000018209677,0.00010528852,0.0036288498,0.0001332262,0.008753939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894692,0.00018731428,0.0018512707,0.000040508203,0.000012015337,0.00004336436,0.0010628484,0.000016137394,0.00731731],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992588,0.00026167431,0.000029283687,0.00011946633,0.000084203806,0.00024654504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970619,0.0019850917,0.00035725703,0.00016765216,0.00029026126,0.00013774577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014121877,0.0006176122,0.00065286877,0.00080815016,0.00060237106,0.0018487999,0.0011405015,0.0010167354,0.0057560154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004903188,0.0006486143,0.0010063775,0.0011845096,0.00075516343,0.0009942501,0.00075893285,0.00079937297,0.00062923034],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048438154,0.00032677207,0.12751512,0.00013806624,0.00023849407,0.0005262457,0.0006279893,0.80839217,0.0021940104,0.041003354,0.00249795,0.01605541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008846214,0.000098190045,0.037286334,0.000019036896,0.00011480334,0.00006276843,0.00051451655,0.94835204,0.0005487433,0.0097460635,0.0031274415,0.00004164612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5267055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46679267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5267055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007461901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032971075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95216364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133304460","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00313.x","title":"More reasons why farmers have so little interest in futures markets","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Hedge; Economics; Market neutral; Certainty; Portfolio; Incentive; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Transaction cost; Leverage (statistics); Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Actuarial science; Financial economics","score_opus":0.022834911328094922,"score_gpt":0.2039505958542268,"score_spread":0.1811156845261319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133304460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88949513,0.0014089902,0.004232588,0.055556472,0.00011099331,0.000027377935,0.00013339968,0.000058868387,0.048976097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618286,0.00018522519,0.00018194308,0.00105717,0.000042501197,0.0000043732994,0.0000147592245,0.0000064312712,0.0023247728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989471,0.0003652853,0.000039194045,0.0001844117,0.00020556629,0.00025851376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254054,0.0036064077,0.0018687586,0.0004918128,0.0008517476,0.00064075185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024385718,0.00013922671,0.00027350985,0.0006168093,0.0014187185,0.0021595056,0.0004457095,0.0022326675,0.01625146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013813944,0.00015480499,0.00022353591,0.0006591427,0.002433847,0.003035791,0.0009776107,0.0010188732,0.0009020035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012811722,0.0006525157,0.3775593,0.00052898953,0.00021866545,0.012973393,0.061515473,0.0017348183,0.03233803,0.27690217,0.042130847,0.19216466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020776082,0.00048447892,0.2860989,0.00038654363,0.000103361555,0.008290283,0.13488168,0.005032118,0.008609025,0.34063,0.21502148,0.0002545534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015895602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012857408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01625146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008995489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004455965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05436659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143386581","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00017.x","title":"Rural employment in industrialised countries<sup>⋆</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"International Association for Applied Econometrics","keywords":"Restructuring; Diversity (politics); Rural area; Agriculture; Economic restructuring; Rural economics; Economic geography; Globalization; Consumption (sociology); Banner; Economic growth; Rural sociology; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Rural development; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.012317143030742885,"score_gpt":0.19176497795297107,"score_spread":0.17944783492222818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143386581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633542,0.0068023745,0.00013030723,0.0024235144,0.00011764646,0.000017008619,0.0039297137,0.0000195912,0.023205746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992725,0.0026546675,0.00007414192,0.00014529898,0.00004744847,0.000016482638,0.0011531911,0.0000027562855,0.003180918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996978,0.00008980069,0.00002101171,0.000036110025,0.000049028113,0.000106364394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992969,0.00017185917,0.00025576405,0.000018526956,0.0001267801,0.00013019894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045700345,0.00014067192,0.00015190738,0.0021570523,0.0004993601,0.00095949403,0.00027696078,0.00028241507,0.0066075665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010305743,0.00006335238,0.00012825755,0.004347248,0.0006101813,0.00035611086,0.0008472953,0.0002861439,0.0008452768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033676965,0.00016562564,0.85501635,0.0011069892,0.00010343595,0.0024601487,0.01066417,0.004995248,0.0010310886,0.0129787065,0.025202759,0.08593868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012207964,0.00008229903,0.96267176,0.00020684097,0.000012051385,0.0003115625,0.0077538295,0.0002301537,0.00017288886,0.0007299851,0.027807407,0.000009020881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0160879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021597618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0160879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008788941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070220855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0319885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144347121","doi":"10.1111/agec.12125","title":"Geographical indication regulation and intra‐trade in the European Union","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"European union; International trade; Resizing; Geographical indication; International economics; Gravity model of trade; Business; Trade barrier; Panel data; Economics; Geography; Regional science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.017956361369333516,"score_gpt":0.16484821069487,"score_spread":0.14689184932553648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144347121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790645,0.0014665748,0.0046147425,0.0005246387,0.00001908119,0.000017198025,0.00036565727,0.000043072934,0.013884623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986682,0.000219393,0.00040743998,0.00006764669,0.000011019234,0.000008935569,0.00020477973,0.0000042055153,0.00040829086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956524,0.0021144971,0.00036586294,0.00073174434,0.00075206964,0.00038352274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9317935,0.031070178,0.029900935,0.004022216,0.0023004161,0.0009126374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053713736,0.00024215986,0.00064125715,0.0017142972,0.00043181836,0.0034767783,0.00055555376,0.0014249275,0.0034703494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019284977,0.0002542165,0.00062649924,0.003701113,0.0021588092,0.001296184,0.0011842201,0.00092470704,0.0003099798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006359371,0.00034850583,0.8457475,0.00016675914,0.0005029019,0.00046546455,0.0011719882,0.033915676,0.001666365,0.07027211,0.0025319387,0.042574923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012677093,0.0003779231,0.91647404,0.00039861322,0.0003943,0.0004265311,0.0015576734,0.03177783,0.0030593546,0.030438416,0.014884837,0.00008369822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005231278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026520528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053713736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012468618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006942396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028406918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146266908","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00137.x","title":"An option perspective on generating and maintaining plant variety rights in China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"China; Intellectual property; TRIPS architecture; Revenue; Incentive; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Property rights; Productivity; Business; Plant variety; International trade; Developing country; Economics; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Law; Finance; Engineering; Microeconomics; Political science; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.023975787054001062,"score_gpt":0.18305064445781236,"score_spread":0.1590748574038113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146266908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91309994,0.0004861529,0.008711709,0.0020417941,0.000013907283,0.000068000074,0.00011663597,0.000019744868,0.075442106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998116,0.00007908844,0.00033862435,0.000036742866,0.0000064733536,0.0000067627766,0.000012362962,0.0000012161702,0.0014027486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989826,0.00030268353,0.00004372271,0.00014437985,0.00019668927,0.00032989867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976115,0.0010134722,0.0005626882,0.00021519921,0.0003012902,0.0002959356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020563654,0.00020761411,0.0002608061,0.0018538437,0.0013988254,0.0026199666,0.0007711411,0.0010822229,0.008350652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028508964,0.00014524288,0.00045816746,0.0014624199,0.0045029367,0.002547309,0.0011886519,0.0007787907,0.00016210778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088942776,0.00009670229,0.05166923,0.00006207034,0.000037841077,0.00094593444,0.0015767883,0.015540629,0.002050172,0.9065302,0.00076175487,0.020639785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016961675,0.00027694524,0.16720068,0.00012883265,0.00010851373,0.00066015363,0.0053879656,0.0910827,0.003511452,0.69924706,0.032109044,0.0001170085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018654067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020772645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018654067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038831076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027090195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037091017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148474297","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00554.x","title":"Does acquisition of a cooperative generate profits for the buyer? The Dairyworld case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hubris; Economics; Profitability index; Market liquidity; Stock (firearms); Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Economic shortage; Empirical evidence; Position (finance); Industrial organization; Financial economics; Business; Monetary economics; Finance","score_opus":0.028730997844449803,"score_gpt":0.19048565087407013,"score_spread":0.16175465302962033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148474297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83825743,0.00047036706,0.0016617936,0.007883265,0.000022085378,0.000042657975,0.000033174383,0.000018476621,0.15161073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954881,0.00015141339,0.0001521039,0.00020367827,0.000023764318,0.000008529191,0.000007946518,0.0000025302231,0.0039620004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986015,0.00041390792,0.00003066537,0.0001253302,0.00018279925,0.0006456626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997013,0.0013957011,0.00034586855,0.0002367247,0.00020942565,0.0007993171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002238757,0.00024162965,0.0003099733,0.00064038904,0.0042348057,0.0037980967,0.00068227755,0.0036057916,0.008481208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004320955,0.00024591986,0.0003897231,0.00054442213,0.0038668737,0.0027304254,0.0030458723,0.0023564098,0.0006397125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005518664,0.0017065913,0.14468257,0.00010311416,0.000083503204,0.059615843,0.013302689,0.0053039617,0.0029523806,0.7165216,0.010620155,0.044555645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056912214,0.0023379445,0.15169992,0.0005383897,0.0002957476,0.045031436,0.1455599,0.041241642,0.007710222,0.3900492,0.2146325,0.00033398115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008594566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013808936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008594566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034887183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017320878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028372467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155115835","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00202.x","title":"An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Pesticide; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Agriculture; Damages; Cost–benefit analysis; Willingness to pay; Economics; Natural resource economics; Pesticide residue; Business; Agricultural economics; Geography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06507472808022119,"score_gpt":0.20047452175902086,"score_spread":0.13539979367879967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155115835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173472,0.0031014085,0.009421266,0.002602913,0.00008240622,0.00024742354,0.001294662,0.000034520996,0.06586814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965437,0.0004616561,0.0008341792,0.00003689061,0.000026313162,0.00003334916,0.00018025945,0.00000458664,0.0018791044],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997698,0.0013604918,0.00005876265,0.00008993382,0.0006095581,0.00018322282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919258,0.0062877364,0.0005440007,0.0002256042,0.00075481547,0.00026209335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035426922,0.00053090334,0.0006139559,0.0020056015,0.00047767555,0.0021567382,0.0006143548,0.0009211233,0.005210354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012789729,0.00030150442,0.0007259308,0.0016715617,0.0013317328,0.0014274259,0.00083804724,0.001000128,0.00016355576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004738886,0.0012390917,0.043047998,0.0008514008,0.00081046455,0.0009044576,0.00023442614,0.74480915,0.0038100374,0.108074136,0.0053365473,0.08614352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076309236,0.0033320035,0.09632201,0.00025264823,0.00112617,0.0005024749,0.0012669148,0.8018138,0.0039947545,0.0724388,0.018031558,0.00015576031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016702073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013080255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016702073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066284104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020295088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048092723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155188666","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00223.x","title":"Calculating the cost of irrigation induced soil salinization in the tungabhadra project","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute","keywords":"Soil salinity; Irrigation; Environmental science; Soil retrogression and degradation; Production (economics); Natural resource economics; Range (aeronautics); Water resource management; Soil water; Distribution (mathematics); Economics; Agricultural engineering; Soil science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.017046278857254616,"score_gpt":0.1961096637008263,"score_spread":0.17906338484357168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155188666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951938,0.000022211594,0.0020949317,0.00005973021,0.0000024428757,0.00002794585,0.0002772823,0.00002236583,0.0022991523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811906,0.000019525276,0.0011437429,0.0000025686413,7.5263824e-7,0.000016872209,0.00015715798,0.0000070925566,0.0005333194],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996824,0.00009932013,0.000015983402,0.000035348865,0.000082437655,0.000084483356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986261,0.0007647174,0.00016368463,0.00006844956,0.00025158084,0.00012553223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063150853,0.00031805958,0.00030937162,0.0011734018,0.0005611473,0.0010373722,0.0005539305,0.00054922316,0.002568321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002682988,0.0004374468,0.00048786338,0.0013811918,0.000523721,0.00076501194,0.0007184445,0.00058486254,0.00015256206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024121861,0.00006162515,0.033695746,0.000035909514,0.000038905135,0.00032709012,0.00003812849,0.95556575,0.00065339863,0.0028633948,0.00036698338,0.0061118677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003894935,0.00020179438,0.031396218,0.000010602966,0.00003653646,0.00015640612,0.00027755697,0.9639636,0.0012408408,0.002182756,0.0004721964,0.000022490276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04205655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031090902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04205655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031982665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014719331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08362353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163416113","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00342.x","title":"A joint test of market power, menu costs, and currency invoicing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Invoice; Currency; Exchange-rate pass-through; Profit margin; Monetary economics; Profit (economics); Exchange rate; Economics; Market power; Business; Commerce; International economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.041451785465710794,"score_gpt":0.17756321654955431,"score_spread":0.13611143108384352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163416113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973124,0.000020225023,0.00088521984,0.00003826519,0.0000020567427,0.000014055178,0.00016154171,0.000012100005,0.001554067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924195,0.000007701652,0.00027846728,0.000004968128,0.0000019484453,0.0000055619385,0.0001749551,0.0000031972957,0.00028135965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943105,0.0013316977,0.00038632212,0.0008124628,0.0019847688,0.0011741963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90860564,0.06296728,0.01669456,0.0042419154,0.0037249248,0.0037656485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075982288,0.00044592287,0.001012154,0.0014350407,0.0010058346,0.002187219,0.001068912,0.0006896201,0.0056384215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06679807,0.0002836983,0.0007301874,0.0019204482,0.0020383028,0.001717101,0.0010600514,0.0012728276,0.0002661049],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015657885,0.0003289606,0.96871644,0.000039183444,0.0003497449,0.00047163464,0.0006921885,0.00727757,0.0014538445,0.005164738,0.00038082222,0.013559012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041336105,0.00052276684,0.96507406,0.000007908124,0.0001340183,0.0001095502,0.0011153592,0.028942889,0.0016012813,0.0019012629,0.00051664835,0.00003285719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13298193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06106937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13298193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003015563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037494688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26441574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166116338","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00201.x","title":"Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Productivity; Productivity model; Nonparametric statistics; Agricultural productivity; Production (economics); Strengths and weaknesses; Econometrics; Economics; Environmental economics; Index (typography); Agriculture; Computer science; Microeconomics; Total factor productivity; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.08925002270392976,"score_gpt":0.38488001681834616,"score_spread":0.2956299941144164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166116338","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004092209,0.00015889316,0.9938618,0.00006462673,0.000022214022,0.000056798624,0.00012760669,0.00009769799,0.0015181405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22932628,0.00049770984,0.7647945,0.00007860103,0.00009137935,0.0007975769,0.0007164814,0.00016371661,0.0035337098],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897237,0.006609877,0.0004383538,0.00078672037,0.0021863037,0.00025510887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966174,0.027470237,0.0013852406,0.0023773403,0.0024505467,0.00014260533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014059774,0.001123778,0.0010857944,0.006296283,0.000497419,0.0023655691,0.0019509688,0.0011761559,0.005776206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061959766,0.000377252,0.0015699345,0.005386386,0.001323889,0.0026354864,0.002047708,0.0020287412,0.00079159974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000930669,0.0001679693,0.005259223,0.00024196139,0.00027228368,0.00006155642,0.00017251153,0.39381728,0.0006694659,0.33986875,0.0016268115,0.2577492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002328739,0.000037781687,0.0022799717,0.000052755637,0.000023212755,0.000046391364,0.00008109314,0.7958416,0.0006120788,0.19500192,0.005963983,0.00003596812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037616522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029198856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014059774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023162807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017548891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07435602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168720761","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00100.x","title":"Downward sloping demand for environmental amenities and international compensation: elephant conservation and strategic culling","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Natural resource economics; Economics; Welfare; Culling; Compensation (psychology); Resource (disambiguation); Business; Microeconomics; Market economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.1337996515511852,"score_gpt":0.21987660586746957,"score_spread":0.08607695431628437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168720761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889598,0.00044489477,0.0026207122,0.0020215912,0.0000138085215,0.000010975326,0.00018742973,0.000012146228,0.0057287323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980191,0.00023137324,0.00016970723,0.00007019048,0.000021447488,0.0000044435546,0.00005647353,0.0000025493882,0.0014247684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996687,0.00008006368,0.000020472886,0.000060190607,0.000030978623,0.00013951866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995523,0.0019011404,0.0017959684,0.00017358831,0.0001947062,0.00041167677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000949601,0.00051538384,0.0007301644,0.00072977383,0.0005331366,0.0022341977,0.00055800297,0.0021633026,0.013266695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045208265,0.00023126311,0.00057997805,0.00095826125,0.0018401764,0.0016663817,0.001300654,0.0015161675,0.00036223856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001089464,0.00051780045,0.6939733,0.00026324042,0.00029480626,0.0032994847,0.0010225275,0.10998155,0.008426477,0.14921428,0.003467385,0.028449738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025029556,0.0006836386,0.43772703,0.0001417082,0.00063257146,0.0015349229,0.0059707207,0.24035974,0.0038869435,0.30364156,0.005009811,0.0001610898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012738697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010659896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013266695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016245254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007774638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0443815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212629604","doi":"10.1111/agec.12213","title":"Reassessing marketing boards as hybrid arrangements: evidence from Canadian experiences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Franchising Strategies and Performance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Wageningen University and Research","keywords":"Embeddedness; Transaction cost; Legitimacy; Corporate governance; Marketing; Economics; Property rights; Industrial organization; Business; Point (geometry); Microeconomics; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.028396429287067544,"score_gpt":0.2172295936977585,"score_spread":0.18883316441069095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212629604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93282545,0.0010088993,0.0007236324,0.007246517,0.00008291381,0.00006967954,0.000108709624,0.000014044472,0.05792014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924867,0.00046213073,0.00029094063,0.00057885016,0.0000118683565,0.000010304525,0.000032677584,0.00001561334,0.006110886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98570466,0.00507076,0.00027077613,0.0013281286,0.0044643693,0.0031612965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95796496,0.022451885,0.0035247877,0.002717379,0.007800702,0.00554034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016238285,0.00033767862,0.00045154925,0.0028131732,0.027203882,0.013203442,0.002159555,0.002862168,0.009280149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032269884,0.0006257243,0.00019006379,0.0043605515,0.021920761,0.0056504514,0.005603568,0.0036550001,0.0004936443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096545904,0.00009514614,0.022008745,0.00009980839,0.00001187403,0.0009141511,0.89179415,0.00019046939,0.00066493475,0.045468275,0.006453487,0.032202434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016536178,0.000041110783,0.025965765,0.00021263098,0.000011235238,0.00020102545,0.8372465,0.0003711506,0.00029783254,0.0020851514,0.13349523,0.00005588817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91507703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95766574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08492297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0659585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04682797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47856468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238630183","doi":"10.1111/agec.12240","title":"Farmers’ risk preferences and pesticide use decisions: evidence from field experiments in China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China; Renmin University of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Consumption (sociology); Agricultural economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Agriculture; Economics; Food security; Business; Natural resource economics; Agricultural science; Expected utility hypothesis; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.0357723293584179,"score_gpt":0.23257308369802338,"score_spread":0.19680075433960548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238630183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996014,0.000017839093,0.00009375056,0.000021470574,0.0000013830588,0.000032075623,0.0000451921,0.0000015655409,0.00018530016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875677,0.000076649216,0.0004836684,0.00006597514,0.0000031056613,0.000101980426,0.00013658337,0.000001436415,0.00037379187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983353,0.00085792306,0.00009310309,0.00029871822,0.00023772892,0.00017727289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914705,0.003978999,0.002347831,0.0009871393,0.00070281536,0.0005127956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051971157,0.0006677703,0.0005690516,0.0006232867,0.0010492866,0.00064001867,0.00092048245,0.0008017095,0.0019540752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044975,0.00036358228,0.000826384,0.0008550379,0.0016475454,0.00086377084,0.00070206367,0.0006993165,0.00019386644],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048744483,0.01808549,0.89069784,0.00040666718,0.00083040283,0.0010661683,0.006136344,0.0048470655,0.039484084,0.0010936456,0.0011905248,0.031287458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006213355,0.011330274,0.96488214,0.0000508554,0.0003264633,0.00011677266,0.0036059716,0.009150482,0.0071366862,0.0015280655,0.001151348,0.00009960576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037579987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051422086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037579987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016490684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014832416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07472247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407114592","doi":"10.1111/agec.12238","title":"Using proportional modeling to evaluate irrigator preferences for market‐based water reallocation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Government (linguistics); Apportionment; Debt; Public economics; Agricultural economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.04013839730717136,"score_gpt":0.22084346626465232,"score_spread":0.18070506895748095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407114592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654269,0.000025661944,0.028283237,0.00018006383,0.000011231153,0.00008116245,0.00014191394,0.00003517702,0.0058145495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963935,0.00001040479,0.0024552112,0.000020131623,0.0000033030724,0.000049064285,0.00007730042,0.000009218466,0.0009817972],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973858,0.0018866906,0.00005859113,0.00027724638,0.00018425539,0.00020741636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152523,0.006494716,0.0009941625,0.00040335683,0.00038297084,0.00019952412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060782223,0.00047397133,0.00047090786,0.00057378557,0.00029404994,0.0016303003,0.0011020157,0.0006405849,0.007551696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018306075,0.00028767737,0.001194363,0.0009299031,0.00062804547,0.0011472884,0.0011568228,0.00094000925,0.0003279105],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008491172,0.0007998847,0.110468894,0.00009047709,0.00032741783,0.0001675096,0.00039602298,0.81538546,0.0017892671,0.044096533,0.0010241898,0.02460537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022307067,0.00019948756,0.01274149,0.000006634661,0.000029290419,0.0000109888315,0.00022491963,0.980224,0.0003029336,0.005743354,0.00048208886,0.0000125430115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009211241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006631711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009211241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018696685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011007341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032145143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460224083","doi":"10.1111/agec.12250","title":"Farm share of the food dollar: an IO approach for the United States and Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Agricultural economics; Boom; Economics; Commodity; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Food systems; Market share; Food prices; Food security; Business; Agriculture; Geography; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.018168432684712247,"score_gpt":0.16266761067724367,"score_spread":0.14449917799253142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460224083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74967146,0.0026954098,0.013609859,0.0019486467,0.00007486453,0.00031399872,0.057694636,0.0003866437,0.17360437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482314,0.0015370423,0.009405434,0.00016671298,0.000016029213,0.00011690369,0.019054336,0.00011122333,0.021360787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933475,0.000041008967,0.00002458311,0.000083526276,0.00037269984,0.00014336077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847573,0.00012769406,0.000097305565,0.000043870812,0.0011351529,0.000120207114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076980225,0.00039040824,0.0005195222,0.008554055,0.0016250174,0.0025885147,0.0010209962,0.00027161906,0.0045279264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028117518,0.00020273203,0.0007493322,0.011136586,0.00047221888,0.0006895143,0.0010223312,0.0008172776,0.0003505644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022524087,0.00021343483,0.6403242,0.00031089404,0.0005377336,0.0011929697,0.0023789597,0.060698908,0.00090687483,0.12342962,0.0492184,0.12056278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042612523,0.000055182838,0.7064749,0.00021177786,0.00024355593,0.00027126665,0.008698893,0.15901813,0.001570558,0.015318266,0.10793634,0.00015840962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03368889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03368889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021418303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24443114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470996720","doi":"10.1111/agec.12248","title":"Cattle sharing and rental contracts in an Agrarian economy: evidence from Ethiopia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Renting; Moral hazard; Cash; Business; Economics; Multivariate probit model; Crop insurance; Population; Incentive; Agriculture; Finance; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.024617638815672353,"score_gpt":0.21684856763177127,"score_spread":0.1922309288160989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470996720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997948,0.00027925294,0.00013960818,0.00007987001,0.0000010553675,0.000004759966,0.0001823722,8.476429e-7,0.0013641409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994373,0.00027217722,0.000058384332,0.000015266993,0.000002051097,0.0000017236457,0.000073361356,3.9222064e-7,0.00013944102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997019,0.0001265716,0.000017999479,0.000039047536,0.000038776416,0.00007567866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480283,0.0028476417,0.0015823384,0.0001530158,0.00028950805,0.00032474118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000905171,0.00016662592,0.00026918002,0.0008932907,0.00056864606,0.0010223307,0.00036355562,0.00026960715,0.0032256073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019783098,0.00019420723,0.0001494403,0.0015531051,0.0009148433,0.0006783191,0.00070275954,0.00036112743,0.0001550007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045093225,0.0004690597,0.9611989,0.00031756563,0.00025523079,0.0016778887,0.003942298,0.003178838,0.0007331355,0.008479152,0.00082157564,0.018475462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006288868,0.00020712009,0.96504617,0.00019642303,0.00012874368,0.00045118848,0.021389436,0.004997179,0.0006437,0.0030002908,0.0038417273,0.000035230143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012505336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01116908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012505336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000596189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045307665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02486509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508875124","doi":"10.1111/agec.12386","title":"Nonfarm employment, agricultural intensification, and productivity change: empirical findings from Uganda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Nonfarm payrolls; Productivity; Agriculture; Economics; Agricultural productivity; Agricultural economics; Farm income; Labour economics; Production (economics); Economic growth; Geography; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.10751124422057891,"score_gpt":0.28877870861513805,"score_spread":0.18126746439455915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508875124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992217,0.00021922338,0.00008068978,0.000037503552,0.0000014174129,0.000005084846,0.00009548715,0.0000013114554,0.00033757513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992207,0.0002318618,0.0000656953,0.00001672198,0.0000034173909,0.000008977132,0.00019432268,0.0000012136164,0.00025706552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989261,0.0006371946,0.00006447213,0.000094646064,0.00008594657,0.00019157834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985981,0.010232554,0.0022893138,0.000490659,0.00051494536,0.0004916192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022359393,0.00037917573,0.0007695261,0.0012678565,0.00079367956,0.0011143002,0.00058400474,0.00039021607,0.0036326556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007891689,0.00037119215,0.00058745925,0.002608404,0.0007308181,0.0006811519,0.0015246781,0.00061293127,0.00054556335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024154848,0.0003564463,0.9808121,0.00014181822,0.00022236728,0.00094948255,0.0032866213,0.0013083811,0.00025028552,0.0003902325,0.00033643033,0.011704318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017730208,0.00015297571,0.9885799,0.00005274507,0.00010301409,0.0002561431,0.0073059564,0.0021893783,0.00015883158,0.00025633982,0.00091444154,0.000012419337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0171957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018757692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0171957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043686296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005262333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03419125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559919590","doi":"10.1111/agec.12322","title":"Is late really better than never? The farmer welfare effects of pineapple adoption in Ghana","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"United States Agency for International Development; International Growth Centre; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Welfare; Shock (circulatory); Economics; Context (archaeology); Agriculture; Asset (computer security); Agricultural economics; Survey data collection; Developing country; Economic growth; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.013423194440280601,"score_gpt":0.20278614699696865,"score_spread":0.18936295255668806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559919590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99912816,0.000090565394,0.00006102027,0.0003228542,0.0000019124775,0.0000016967462,0.00004804702,0.0000012763244,0.00034439715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997807,0.00004120364,0.000020882004,0.000018587849,0.000001984955,9.544677e-7,0.000013274422,5.019068e-7,0.00012175622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999571,0.00022713737,0.000008777564,0.00004490204,0.00002804771,0.000120150566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964562,0.0013825981,0.0016597847,0.0000772383,0.0001277116,0.00029641576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007141396,0.00012271121,0.00019773269,0.00020066828,0.00022946975,0.0004988805,0.00017949511,0.00032479456,0.0030500425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032017496,0.000082037295,0.0002638303,0.00036473727,0.0005941766,0.00048809598,0.0005093922,0.0006146834,0.00012434328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007208719,0.00028226225,0.98211664,0.000033296237,0.00012615604,0.00067996624,0.00072142895,0.0016862196,0.002570082,0.0006585596,0.00034741717,0.010057069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014656248,0.0002502995,0.99526775,0.00001694056,0.000041473537,0.000064160224,0.0019085788,0.0011899701,0.00032420582,0.0005568429,0.00036006572,0.000005029823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016201846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025961727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016201846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077109924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003533419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03221512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564364335","doi":"10.1111/agec.12351","title":"Demand for a labor‐based drought insurance scheme in Ethiopia: a stated choice experiment approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Cash; Index (typography); Payment; Actuarial science; Mixed logit; Wage; Economics; Work (physics); Subsidy; Business; Labour economics; Finance; Logistic regression; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01691481385973419,"score_gpt":0.22468237234448418,"score_spread":0.20776755848474998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564364335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981584,0.000008351093,0.0008494534,0.000039633018,0.000009804884,0.00029407252,0.00009690668,0.0000029613395,0.0005404389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942667,0.000029270965,0.0030315437,0.00007376243,0.000012615101,0.0013006205,0.00010160196,0.0000024405606,0.0011815662],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416345,0.0043752743,0.00028837167,0.00041493273,0.00033187447,0.00042612432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96892613,0.026804568,0.0021762934,0.0008818768,0.0006013121,0.0006097332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114304405,0.0007144133,0.000970177,0.00044413516,0.001066979,0.002141929,0.0010507391,0.0018710544,0.005931452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011846538,0.0006450352,0.00093522365,0.0004456696,0.001153754,0.0011606977,0.00063071394,0.0018326368,0.00048687175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.15068296,0.3482598,0.21853575,0.0024525495,0.0018054044,0.001706115,0.014283735,0.08363597,0.090864584,0.030710964,0.0023162249,0.05474588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021796955,0.34432074,0.19788483,0.0002438659,0.0017233702,0.00026161855,0.017872572,0.33721945,0.046985164,0.02222403,0.008660267,0.000807179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020146316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018106014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114304405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001698716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001137573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060450673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739270677","doi":"10.1111/agec.12366","title":"Modeling regime‐dependent agricultural commodity price volatilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Economics; Econometrics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Kurtosis; Leverage (statistics); Leverage effect; Commodity market; Commodity; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03468277565516525,"score_gpt":0.21517869844149526,"score_spread":0.18049592278633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739270677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86379325,0.0001532773,0.13354117,0.0001554531,0.000026231235,0.0000251847,0.00020966514,0.00018781128,0.0019078917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958912,0.00004211611,0.0034216344,0.000007730556,0.000008229652,0.000006360886,0.00008223693,0.000007663574,0.0005328082],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976844,0.00007141779,0.000011742903,0.00006388675,0.000049191804,0.00003527172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993482,0.00037662956,0.00013556218,0.000055289966,0.0000632428,0.000020993632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008761833,0.00032094875,0.0004049844,0.00049002434,0.0001520684,0.00071711687,0.0005344386,0.00059903634,0.00091988314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025329213,0.00027099566,0.00067095837,0.0005147976,0.0003060175,0.00078449474,0.00033986542,0.00059172756,0.00011750546],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008948696,0.00006992406,0.021720596,0.000026489632,0.00011962613,0.00011415666,0.000045839915,0.94963604,0.005728889,0.008020268,0.0002518271,0.014176865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022239099,0.000010985058,0.002767032,8.9461105e-7,0.00000487711,0.0000075939756,0.0000033827243,0.99562967,0.00029615292,0.0011941693,0.00007855853,0.000004425144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007429424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041205133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007429424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003885501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042898534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014772356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800641050","doi":"10.1111/agec.12433","title":"Renters, landlords, and farmland stewardship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Renting; Stewardship (theology); Agriculture; Business; Agricultural economics; Agricultural land; Land tenure; Tillage; Land management; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Conservation agriculture; Land use; Economics; Environmental stewardship; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.011191939343607826,"score_gpt":0.17754740608850458,"score_spread":0.16635546674489676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800641050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786985,0.00008744633,0.0000730229,0.0002503257,0.000001291338,0.0000029881624,0.00011739067,0.0000011290007,0.0015964567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994344,0.000040646457,0.00003520705,0.000008115132,0.0000024021065,8.789872e-7,0.00003854691,4.083318e-7,0.00043934298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994759,0.00016376814,0.00003236595,0.000073996445,0.00011560655,0.0001383252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901688,0.0023295851,0.0052510435,0.00034352572,0.0004147083,0.0014923727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007117141,0.00006217411,0.00019787153,0.00047229315,0.00044872795,0.000728781,0.0002890192,0.00025563448,0.006452882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048154965,0.00007628507,0.00014401796,0.00075775565,0.001162818,0.00072022795,0.0005519039,0.00030282035,0.00020464502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033046672,0.000040154737,0.9953941,0.000012109079,0.00002478698,0.000054511256,0.00047381982,0.0001662716,0.00018784901,0.0005575375,0.00020669482,0.0028492024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022431063,0.000019428056,0.9976127,0.000009106119,0.000007656869,0.000020526399,0.001211897,0.00026387893,0.00004942559,0.00012377126,0.000677089,0.0000023388413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1480425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3180953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1480425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018700663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013577809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2943616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932911785","doi":"10.1111/agec.12487","title":"Risk aversion and land allocation between annual and perennial crops in semisubsistence farming: a stochastic optimization approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Perennial plant; Agriculture; Economics; Production (economics); Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Agricultural economics; Yield (engineering); Agricultural science; Microeconomics; Environmental science; Agronomy; Geography; Financial economics","score_opus":0.005676887912370493,"score_gpt":0.16838098582648078,"score_spread":0.16270409791411028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932911785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82788086,0.00045760852,0.16434917,0.0011610113,0.000032794047,0.0000643239,0.0001594323,0.000058336962,0.005836462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946629,0.00017899166,0.0032658803,0.000058056405,0.000012989242,0.000028373144,0.000032127205,0.0000075866596,0.001753044],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.000477564,0.000018257677,0.00009599184,0.000053184405,0.00014816422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529266,0.00361831,0.000700751,0.00007435411,0.00011542445,0.00019849974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002267689,0.00055327226,0.0009951972,0.00045000858,0.00036916972,0.0014429752,0.00063409645,0.00091167423,0.0022172504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004129473,0.0005506056,0.0009793624,0.00039180063,0.0010295268,0.00074683706,0.0008330076,0.0011005816,0.00011774235],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011742334,0.000073085874,0.0036059548,0.000025623545,0.00010231341,0.00010963225,0.00005841853,0.9780149,0.00082726876,0.014714119,0.00022421892,0.002126905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001832888,0.00007866395,0.0023944818,0.000008312369,0.000029533605,0.000018068084,0.00008767157,0.9854278,0.00013055827,0.01162037,0.0001714522,0.000014684682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008134133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004865175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008134133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015689909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001023133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016173542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950854548","doi":"10.1111/agec.12570","title":"Impacts of trade liberalization in Canada's supply managed dairy industry","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International trade; European union; Economic surplus; Free trade; Partial equilibrium; Welfare; Trade barrier; Liberalization; International economics; Negotiation; Business; General equilibrium theory; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.014138533024454671,"score_gpt":0.16289606817648378,"score_spread":0.1487575351520291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950854548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94105697,0.0010183419,0.0015886651,0.0040076924,0.000058902297,0.000111471185,0.0034701123,0.00012455034,0.04856334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99317545,0.0004964905,0.0004890743,0.0002937575,0.000007807235,0.00001288543,0.0007005439,0.000006905682,0.004817053],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831593,0.00020375878,0.000033526754,0.000103471364,0.00056017854,0.00078308984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982187,0.00034651908,0.000243165,0.00006625958,0.00071677065,0.00040862488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009171133,0.0005047053,0.0005121332,0.0009812168,0.0025802513,0.0033480073,0.0012428713,0.00093700615,0.007198182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031475842,0.00029504122,0.0010591167,0.0016639607,0.0016141059,0.00060368807,0.0017628286,0.001264163,0.00021825831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008293673,0.0005372957,0.23131618,0.00036874495,0.0004865431,0.00167808,0.000851484,0.6292858,0.004811043,0.07535607,0.019029755,0.03544961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036965476,0.0006757031,0.43398643,0.0002721418,0.00060551934,0.00026318908,0.011609399,0.4446716,0.004565073,0.021922287,0.08078931,0.0002697743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06165607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06165607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058353383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44734824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982433167","doi":"10.1111/agec.12534","title":"Trade‐offs in the performance of alternative farming systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Sustainability; Livelihood; Organic farming; Food systems; Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Business; Intensive farming; Urban agriculture; Ecological farming; Scale (ratio); Economics; Integrated farming; Sustainable agriculture; Agricultural economics; Environmental economics; Food security; Geography; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.011012686911183548,"score_gpt":0.1759883260355889,"score_spread":0.16497563912440535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982433167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.817254,0.012055835,0.023440745,0.005013215,0.00017729362,0.00013255779,0.0002515754,0.00008698726,0.1415878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381644,0.0013964904,0.002972483,0.00009477916,0.000033593366,0.000023073217,0.000048259342,0.000011613311,0.0016033135],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952312,0.0024646618,0.00020062429,0.0004140635,0.0010420611,0.0006473711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950648,0.002441139,0.0007884528,0.00043051367,0.0008768498,0.0003982795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007049115,0.000413259,0.00038093698,0.0012825514,0.0009076694,0.0052896747,0.0009570422,0.0011396088,0.0062504928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007082157,0.00019654905,0.00049321743,0.0013109684,0.0024231258,0.004014417,0.0025897599,0.0006372739,0.00075539696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010396081,0.0007094104,0.1266266,0.0027566021,0.0009314914,0.0012415444,0.003967229,0.08198557,0.03657034,0.3632475,0.00496861,0.37595555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001458447,0.004221525,0.26964524,0.0017901988,0.0005015786,0.0017380235,0.014507675,0.050604112,0.024360165,0.4315226,0.20061603,0.0003470863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009506811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019533145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007049115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022914275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006964825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037279725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982563470","doi":"10.1111/agec.12529","title":"Comparative advantage and agricultural trade","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative advantage; Agriculture; Economics; International trade; Welfare; Agricultural productivity; Productivity; Trade barrier; International economics; Agricultural economics; Economic growth; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.0337024190152891,"score_gpt":0.1941971446126028,"score_spread":0.1604947255973137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982563470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23235157,0.056704428,0.014788154,0.03226378,0.0004875262,0.000030663334,0.0009286308,0.00006147614,0.6623838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862753,0.00602314,0.00057983055,0.0005414956,0.0004117675,0.000008645998,0.00011437958,0.0000070105084,0.00603839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994836,0.00020480274,0.000014054512,0.00010540713,0.00009103768,0.000101090045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.0010907097,0.00029554893,0.000116454416,0.00014124282,0.00012020918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010634952,0.00025743904,0.00040645374,0.0013637949,0.00079881895,0.0026486157,0.00032624693,0.0008219398,0.016416878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003168695,0.000064479704,0.00029359668,0.0020834664,0.002727591,0.0021203605,0.0015041333,0.00088906207,0.0004913341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022021422,0.000011450873,0.003802039,0.00007438605,0.000037888105,0.000084135994,0.00025649983,0.0013468476,0.00014653456,0.9749892,0.0029995926,0.016229326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008928593,0.000028234968,0.012118165,0.000120316436,0.000024231602,0.00020241484,0.00043283936,0.0011142726,0.00012385247,0.9460658,0.039749708,0.000011285745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001992374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010962699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016416878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018086882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006176829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0549199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026822395","doi":"10.1111/agec.12592","title":"Nudging farmers in crop choice using price information: Evidence from Ethiopian Commodity Exchange","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Economics; Crop; Agricultural economics; Agribusiness; Agriculture; Forestry; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.05248158512182153,"score_gpt":0.23397400936045892,"score_spread":0.1814924242386374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026822395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982324,0.00016363943,0.000111040266,0.000112941416,0.0000020735201,0.0000034964653,0.00008502637,5.5457923e-7,0.0012888656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995641,0.00014600073,0.00005564828,0.000027678063,0.0000033536016,0.0000020012708,0.000047688503,4.8857737e-7,0.00015309692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984352,0.000979705,0.00005935774,0.00019379289,0.00016964541,0.00016226922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97410345,0.017714541,0.005969118,0.0009284814,0.0008278768,0.000456553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029917294,0.00019339508,0.0002723441,0.00077227573,0.0006294373,0.0011280199,0.0004417146,0.00059381145,0.0035569665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008522964,0.00021702214,0.00022042113,0.0013463547,0.0011814052,0.00091537915,0.0009332186,0.0005180844,0.000252274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090245885,0.0006075388,0.9695097,0.00016750376,0.00036474006,0.0008856125,0.006338296,0.00085152156,0.0010977709,0.0024093403,0.0004358938,0.01642945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045698172,0.0002789915,0.9813804,0.00009520485,0.00015268852,0.00018379728,0.012481361,0.0011871492,0.0006953446,0.0014616995,0.0020111196,0.000026488611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060913926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005357205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060913926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034245028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002972854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015821993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042209942","doi":"10.1111/agec.12587","title":"Eliciting farmers’ subjective probabilities, risk, and uncertainty preferences using contextualized field experiments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Queen's University; James Hutton Institute","keywords":"Incentive; Context (archaeology); Certainty; Economics; Estimation; Econometrics; Field (mathematics); Risk aversion (psychology); Actuarial science; Field experiment; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Statistics; Mathematics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.13102869100858286,"score_gpt":0.22876671138110427,"score_spread":0.09773802037252141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042209942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794741,0.00004850246,0.017636813,0.00006404078,0.000008522556,0.00026360888,0.0001266859,0.000018289553,0.002359454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98298556,0.00006477735,0.015953518,0.0000755398,0.000008589312,0.00032293276,0.00009778821,0.0000040344535,0.00048718372],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946108,0.004182578,0.00016541682,0.00047906433,0.000402951,0.00015921655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9591935,0.033938628,0.0035762473,0.0019162273,0.0010027217,0.00037266736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062218052,0.0006467384,0.00046254802,0.00034778652,0.00040964768,0.0010855643,0.00056934974,0.0007188195,0.0037795012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017612828,0.00033346182,0.00034864165,0.00040096583,0.0009973604,0.0009047187,0.00090904604,0.0008129265,0.00016412316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01755609,0.018106548,0.15240489,0.0025786601,0.0013036572,0.0017287296,0.014983866,0.19235726,0.34705794,0.050495178,0.0023811825,0.19904608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028683064,0.038561795,0.32960245,0.0005609841,0.0010372339,0.0005088453,0.00698714,0.30752036,0.1494592,0.14448296,0.017589174,0.00082150684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018518814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035606697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062218052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008881446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053700246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032904446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121410940","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00109.x","title":"Consumption effects of genetic modification: what if consumers are right?<sup>⋆</sup>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Labelling; Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Product (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Ranking (information retrieval); Production (economics); Economic surplus; Business; Chemistry","score_opus":0.019541467804942567,"score_gpt":0.19825222795501307,"score_spread":0.1787107601500705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121410940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7969438,0.00096236984,0.048725717,0.021937966,0.00011527663,0.00009683346,0.00061023654,0.00007589275,0.13053195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904212,0.00023926132,0.0014746551,0.0005252554,0.000029996172,0.000021057698,0.000040497132,0.000008471757,0.0072397063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996904,0.00014711433,0.000006883077,0.000044170254,0.000050261922,0.00006111706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827063,0.0011513226,0.00023578962,0.00012771702,0.00014195322,0.000072609444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008204553,0.00025871757,0.00037430628,0.0001778979,0.00029993302,0.001203357,0.0005441323,0.001551587,0.012536322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002874225,0.00016458234,0.0006248108,0.00021415489,0.0020953305,0.0015278239,0.0005548074,0.0009200006,0.00043656115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091760774,0.00029145833,0.03430384,0.00022944165,0.00010993664,0.001211341,0.0012912576,0.11213111,0.005691729,0.79289603,0.0067753815,0.04415072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014447278,0.0003871055,0.026172621,0.000106016545,0.00018444828,0.000445852,0.0016278676,0.19093165,0.0023534698,0.76507896,0.012496855,0.00007072165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054136715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027180095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012536322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015022577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003053492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041938186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136353281","doi":"10.1111/agec.12618","title":"Drivers of farm commercialization in Nigeria and Tanzania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Subsistence agriculture; Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Cash crop; Economics; Productivity; Panel data; Business; Factor market; Agricultural science; Economic growth; Geography; Market economy; Marketing","score_opus":0.01732728608662842,"score_gpt":0.21015230012791272,"score_spread":0.1928250140412843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136353281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995072,0.000039407183,0.0000233517,0.00005330795,5.912576e-7,0.0000032787514,0.00006556046,7.701562e-7,0.0003065251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979824,0.000031325675,0.000014632733,0.0000038477096,5.0721974e-7,0.0000022243958,0.000033549004,3.0563706e-7,0.000115478084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984133,0.000037728194,0.000010041924,0.00002330226,0.000014170165,0.00007345719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988937,0.00026576463,0.0005697038,0.000029296332,0.00007471883,0.00016695677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030656674,0.00011506452,0.00012580305,0.0004183486,0.0003691495,0.00059877976,0.00018362343,0.00020180264,0.0026223187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010422057,0.00013092239,0.00014527972,0.0006148668,0.00033449059,0.00039598133,0.0006166306,0.00040138056,0.000119851116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042307885,0.00003575425,0.99496174,0.000014345349,0.000010897911,0.0003623268,0.00075757393,0.00018807137,0.00032608042,0.0003899794,0.00013813606,0.002772773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019231454,0.000022932452,0.99515015,0.000018015584,0.0000049511023,0.00010333287,0.0036576213,0.0006015185,0.000059097027,0.000094781266,0.00028312305,0.0000024917915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021181267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03338333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021181267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005865929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004891728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042115927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196765117","doi":"10.1111/agec.12674","title":"Bargaining power and risk from substitutability between products attributes the case of specialty eggs in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining power; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Negotiation; Profit maximization; Economics; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Profit (economics); Investment (military); Supply chain; Downstream (manufacturing); Business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Operations management","score_opus":0.016195929157390702,"score_gpt":0.18160616813725128,"score_spread":0.16541023897986057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196765117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90327173,0.0004864659,0.013168714,0.0015332664,0.000021443084,0.00014377621,0.0003325913,0.000032416126,0.081009686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929182,0.00021757427,0.0008396851,0.00003204437,0.000008718221,0.000015967753,0.00005649561,0.0000031803902,0.0059080496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981211,0.00034363376,0.00003304695,0.00015928858,0.00025643854,0.0010865103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554294,0.0027945328,0.0005854757,0.0001787183,0.00045528286,0.00044312113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021204574,0.00063498603,0.0009512682,0.0012681946,0.0037833794,0.0034805518,0.0014274992,0.0016007685,0.011673145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005775743,0.00037844534,0.0010382007,0.0017122738,0.0037075046,0.0011692831,0.0012656045,0.0016955812,0.0003677301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067234784,0.00023207726,0.039164968,0.00013442442,0.00015774505,0.0030356536,0.0016645037,0.38583145,0.0021686957,0.5353347,0.0054033245,0.02620006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037852212,0.0002290936,0.043030046,0.00011606589,0.0002455461,0.00036741563,0.0078034503,0.73223776,0.0013725221,0.2013876,0.012630237,0.0002017095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8125708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80663484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18742919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020231852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011313316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37706596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234509913","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00182.x","title":"Short‐term employment transitions of the Canadian labour force: rural‐urban differences in underemployment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Underemployment; Disadvantage; Economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Rural area; Unemployment; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.015174051815954173,"score_gpt":0.18900529577830935,"score_spread":0.17383124396235516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234509913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99522686,0.000338839,0.000059097692,0.00020595318,0.000004961874,0.000020382424,0.0024519085,0.0000035971318,0.0016883948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793243,0.00021067417,0.000052395353,0.000021892121,0.0000021654978,0.0000068906984,0.0009975455,0.0000017088008,0.0007743831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944776,0.000036088393,0.000027311393,0.00006403128,0.00016994496,0.00025490965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846375,0.000099047895,0.0003767449,0.000041350464,0.0005378746,0.00048127686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057621504,0.00019201556,0.00024239084,0.0018972658,0.0019217526,0.0009154833,0.0009117433,0.00026767774,0.0028371047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020992474,0.0001665238,0.0003546625,0.0036374382,0.0005298066,0.00035691043,0.00096545595,0.0004833072,0.00022919137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092403694,0.000029476227,0.9888148,0.000033478213,0.000031632033,0.000060180722,0.0022162953,0.00021618034,0.00021988602,0.00024151598,0.00070999644,0.007334132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013244772,0.0000076281963,0.99824286,0.00000829272,0.0000037828522,0.000011161671,0.0010261713,0.00011689665,0.000022205108,0.000015791118,0.00054044084,0.0000033593765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98921585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010784149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009812972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013260872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071198404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236007274","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00025.x","title":"Strategies and impact of agro‐allied parastatals reform in Nigeria","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Business; Restructuring; Profitability index; Agribusiness; Liberalization; Agriculture; Economics; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.018077620037076296,"score_gpt":0.24422499809402656,"score_spread":0.22614737805695026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236007274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962811,0.0006737402,0.00044503153,0.0027054418,0.000041099873,0.00013595159,0.000018970697,0.0000075338266,0.033161186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946214,0.00019844381,0.00021694337,0.00017761556,0.000004403197,0.000015846439,0.000011132617,0.0000011831452,0.004753089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998787,0.00042114023,0.000048008125,0.00007013042,0.00016034913,0.00051339227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990101,0.00015791332,0.00029229376,0.000068174006,0.00017770019,0.00029388754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011269968,0.00014006921,0.00013277226,0.00044687666,0.0029470886,0.0027977338,0.00039329974,0.0008342893,0.0026499135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016683746,0.00013688342,0.00012399683,0.0003950026,0.0022490968,0.0006435365,0.0022518963,0.0010529697,0.00014747829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007800622,0.0019256802,0.22669479,0.0010748133,0.000112373906,0.006030534,0.09081219,0.0048627267,0.026008958,0.3393093,0.006851595,0.295537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011343538,0.001388308,0.44953722,0.0010151806,0.000139984,0.0010456148,0.20528886,0.0040130056,0.011019807,0.019918028,0.3064183,0.00010220519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016691074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025093287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016691074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003547198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006792669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033187866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238949084","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00023.x","title":"The social cost of labor in rural development: job creation benefits re‐examined","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Payroll; Economics; Labour economics; Unemployment; Subsidy; Wage; Job creation; Labor demand; Secondary labor market; Productivity; Labor relations; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.02070155784863863,"score_gpt":0.23102739477727352,"score_spread":0.21032583692863488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238949084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.594342,0.012499528,0.021308953,0.028124623,0.0003173327,0.00006643186,0.00040944657,0.00004144295,0.3428903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991682,0.0017712391,0.0005294074,0.00017155097,0.00008638696,0.000013634656,0.00001636151,0.000006270808,0.0057231206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936384,0.00028823328,0.000011390272,0.00003167793,0.00013873148,0.00016605886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785656,0.0012804552,0.00021387494,0.000117771706,0.00040494624,0.00012639158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008602607,0.00031709555,0.00031904844,0.0014297032,0.0008338093,0.0022323595,0.000457044,0.0006258997,0.010070359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023840237,0.00011503864,0.00032614122,0.0014778678,0.0025225072,0.0013295505,0.0016094751,0.00078017596,0.00027905952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024923816,0.0001861749,0.016277619,0.00055386894,0.0000642162,0.0004156343,0.0012021165,0.025365215,0.0009266554,0.8566192,0.004687392,0.093452744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005100711,0.00029941887,0.064405136,0.00091707404,0.00014597242,0.0004652376,0.007985709,0.025159642,0.001649284,0.81587076,0.083005615,0.000045069155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003248215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007051311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010070359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002829684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013002024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033688664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239984144","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00250.x","title":"Current issues in the economics of agriculture, food, and resources: reshaping agriculture's contributions to society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Agriculture; Political science; Agricultural economics; Economy; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.025079108289422225,"score_gpt":0.2561616326543721,"score_spread":0.23108252436494986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239984144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01482535,0.12353552,0.0037972296,0.8127916,0.004024705,0.000009147968,0.000057836518,0.000038153557,0.040920466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.592451,0.26794472,0.006317111,0.06985026,0.034615178,0.00006699009,0.00009156337,0.000071760085,0.028591469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837923,0.0008188441,0.000050274954,0.00019092241,0.0003403797,0.00022035054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98939437,0.0069420384,0.00048427636,0.0005731044,0.0015368579,0.0010693419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009554141,0.0005659703,0.0007143626,0.0014219967,0.0033092063,0.009618588,0.0025595168,0.0074915146,0.015579894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009909341,0.00025047557,0.00040178196,0.0027386984,0.022417927,0.01634338,0.0028187742,0.0041432166,0.0014692198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000562185,0.00007141347,0.001071192,0.00026144943,0.000013719693,0.000051296505,0.0015414937,0.0006227244,0.0002490539,0.8628516,0.040527157,0.09268262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015967376,0.000027675538,0.0023386662,0.0004078628,0.000009132692,0.00007782446,0.0059007676,0.0005223186,0.00011309319,0.6380444,0.35252544,0.000016848722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036698005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008301308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015579894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004045583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054500448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05211997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252967254","doi":"10.1016/s0169-5150(01)00078-0","title":"Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Productivity model; Nonparametric statistics; Agricultural productivity; Production (economics); Econometrics; Strengths and weaknesses; Economics; Index (typography); Environmental economics; Agriculture; Computer science; Microeconomics; Total factor productivity; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.015911034751527477,"score_gpt":0.27735517003748894,"score_spread":0.26144413528596144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252967254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023899095,0.00021547217,0.9949239,0.00008179774,0.00004739285,0.000048310216,0.00016891006,0.0001807551,0.0019436018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1495748,0.00075991807,0.8424192,0.0001231705,0.00017695596,0.00076763827,0.000947505,0.00031120557,0.0049196454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156815,0.004616251,0.00039473345,0.0008948059,0.0022369924,0.00028910165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98204917,0.012552479,0.0011231117,0.0020576837,0.00209573,0.00012171223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010458031,0.0012465406,0.0010604934,0.0063939346,0.00061436597,0.002679437,0.002457666,0.001438401,0.0067112753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055323288,0.00038583143,0.0017776983,0.006814999,0.0014242817,0.0032826115,0.002548281,0.002141926,0.0013092621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009919595,0.00014734536,0.0064827506,0.00030621688,0.00031748187,0.00008969115,0.00028866637,0.24465437,0.0008513913,0.3831172,0.003455848,0.36018977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033040724,0.000052766456,0.0038030185,0.00008315813,0.00004642514,0.00011413773,0.00016361733,0.6120037,0.0008548256,0.3652857,0.017488077,0.00007149344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004124693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029397656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010458031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017775893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018061376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055308044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253929142","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00220.x","title":"Rural–urban migration and agricultural productivity: the case of Senegal","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Per capita; Agriculture; Earnings; Per capita income; Investment (military); Agricultural productivity; Agricultural economics; Econometric model; Urbanization; Rural area; Economic growth; Geography; Population; Econometrics","score_opus":0.007450209270897426,"score_gpt":0.21753207380630726,"score_spread":0.21008186453540983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253929142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99670875,0.00027439918,0.00047229425,0.0005530538,0.00000491869,0.0000073293722,0.00015732717,0.000007881399,0.0018141003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989466,0.00026957257,0.00014110813,0.000021760612,0.0000028617249,0.0000055885394,0.000061299914,0.0000017952385,0.0005494572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959856,0.00022063333,0.000008435555,0.000026925538,0.000015903122,0.00012954776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908054,0.00053017534,0.00019048816,0.0000430816,0.000081135935,0.00007464968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085207255,0.00037430876,0.0004074321,0.0011560351,0.00069755194,0.0010993299,0.00051152287,0.00038268295,0.004196144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018351959,0.00023985693,0.0005323518,0.0026277606,0.00096703065,0.0006862718,0.0011870023,0.00074979075,0.00027856108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009380032,0.0004591202,0.62291336,0.00021786621,0.00076217967,0.009070218,0.0026147398,0.2838331,0.0014689493,0.04683261,0.0031878257,0.02770202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033967994,0.00045340264,0.60909396,0.00025610693,0.00060274854,0.0013405472,0.019038407,0.337597,0.0015558541,0.017394776,0.012176294,0.00015116089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1941331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16419882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1941331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021270046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009162626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38600624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383033114","doi":"10.1111/agec.12786","title":"Separability, spillovers, and segmented markets : Evidence from dairy in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Multiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Economics; Uncorrelated; Market segmentation; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Dairy industry; Business; Agricultural economics; Food science","score_opus":0.023295371274147554,"score_gpt":0.20646502691089927,"score_spread":0.18316965563675172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383033114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968156,0.0002217502,0.00031023135,0.00019900112,0.0000017083378,0.0000091648035,0.00041284572,0.0000061036317,0.0020237064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.00010877164,0.00006358216,0.000022979624,0.0000035983567,0.000002971688,0.00017092658,9.968501e-7,0.00014010658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993038,0.0002746318,0.00003690318,0.000100968784,0.00009894696,0.00018464283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894916,0.0058165123,0.0031163117,0.00068855745,0.0005311756,0.0003559335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001003894,0.00017217462,0.00039545284,0.001439278,0.0006211924,0.00110144,0.00061813433,0.0003257571,0.0039024036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037670115,0.00022325305,0.0004591032,0.0028443483,0.0014154447,0.0005633764,0.0015142969,0.0005359902,0.00024384656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037681454,0.00022443394,0.9813597,0.00015998856,0.0003178659,0.00055059337,0.0017942466,0.0019072355,0.0004222057,0.0034862563,0.00083434256,0.008566267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027450023,0.00007930824,0.99023926,0.00004306112,0.00012870703,0.000117058284,0.004471156,0.0017624281,0.0003310999,0.0016469347,0.0011373413,0.000016190419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065212056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052166518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065212056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056147017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005670843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12966502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386308426","doi":"10.1111/agec.12793","title":"Extreme weather and agricultural management decisions among smallholder farmers in rural Thailand and Vietnam","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Cropping; Diversification (marketing strategy); Agriculture; Agricultural diversification; Business; Agricultural economics; Livelihood; Portfolio; Vietnamese; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Finance; Environmental science","score_opus":0.018211424065552713,"score_gpt":0.19392540258605923,"score_spread":0.17571397852050652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386308426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976486,0.000008982475,0.000022657698,0.000018678535,5.5057393e-7,0.0000013867073,0.000034651785,2.6635496e-7,0.00014786673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99983597,0.000013234982,0.0000115295425,0.0000056243794,5.6428524e-7,0.000001691114,0.000028518261,2.0394245e-7,0.00010267108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998845,0.00004061105,0.0000052592177,0.000021346175,0.000008419384,0.000039861352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994499,0.00010994094,0.00020387216,0.00001702077,0.000040984523,0.0001782876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021008211,0.00009756261,0.00010112299,0.00016383328,0.0003339142,0.0004981222,0.00012344707,0.00015695677,0.0014478961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006168734,0.000083640996,0.00009274037,0.00035979357,0.00033930872,0.00035600548,0.00034861837,0.00019805272,0.0000838635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000858905,0.000059952254,0.9890342,0.000018299512,0.00003080103,0.00040513917,0.0050382894,0.00069256336,0.0012185675,0.00013194057,0.00016011497,0.0031242531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029666344,0.00006566885,0.98046964,0.000009650455,0.000005558823,0.00006527218,0.018052125,0.0008129657,0.00008665106,0.00009112845,0.00033234127,0.0000060247075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023645254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043815464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023645254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003712449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027201246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04701525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403659939","doi":"10.1111/agec.12859","title":"An experimental approach to farmer valuation of African rice genetic resources","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Genetic resources; Economics; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Biotechnology; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.04700876777670465,"score_gpt":0.25365814821059285,"score_spread":0.2066493804338882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403659939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962851,0.000007836992,0.0013840346,0.00007152932,0.000015528747,0.00046426046,0.000046591464,0.0000081206645,0.0017169099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878802,0.000024892573,0.0063566486,0.00014994945,0.000024263541,0.0029796036,0.00003899073,0.0000074222116,0.0025380913],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744725,0.0015524876,0.000091020265,0.00045434354,0.00024258511,0.00021239294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99042165,0.0063359747,0.0013318309,0.0012526544,0.00027936453,0.00037857366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023263155,0.0005623828,0.00030401273,0.0003917586,0.00089369173,0.00088704855,0.0008717315,0.0011061239,0.0061117676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004914578,0.00033724122,0.0003327584,0.00033226673,0.0018558741,0.0005348325,0.000868664,0.0015278689,0.0002817422],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021222042,0.16083738,0.032402217,0.00047867742,0.00018979302,0.00063318305,0.007776674,0.0038056602,0.72948647,0.013703477,0.0007241909,0.028740311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011119616,0.3444957,0.19264099,0.0001718667,0.0004646975,0.00043534534,0.008840741,0.026572024,0.38130647,0.020075923,0.01354442,0.00033209057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013171196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015863238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061117676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001418622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009836274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020445883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406192156","doi":"10.1111/agec.12873","title":"Factors affecting investments in environmental assets by agricultural machinery cooperatives (CUMAs): Evidence from France","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Business; Agricultural machinery; Agricultural economics; Economics; Natural resource economics; Geography","score_opus":0.014215487404462386,"score_gpt":0.2041307711226591,"score_spread":0.18991528371819671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406192156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989526,0.000069838214,0.000057311147,0.00008699783,9.0566573e-7,0.0000025690513,0.00005341467,0.0000017124084,0.0007745374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995782,0.000044110744,0.000041328494,0.0000069084035,0.0000023299137,0.0000021367443,0.00006014769,4.1811313e-7,0.00026425614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989209,0.00047612956,0.000031511492,0.00015689636,0.00018727889,0.0002272539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226964,0.0025218758,0.0030535194,0.00027832916,0.0008035635,0.0010731514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016609487,0.00018181968,0.00017588472,0.0013017512,0.0005847335,0.0007792335,0.0003203496,0.00034418792,0.0021300977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029238209,0.00007971055,0.0001764333,0.0013111563,0.0007180592,0.0004942505,0.00081712496,0.00028002483,0.00019008009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053497995,0.000115779265,0.9894499,0.000020116888,0.000043811786,0.00022394067,0.0020872292,0.00044506261,0.00035409234,0.00077453407,0.00044766397,0.0059843617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039730785,0.00006600922,0.9944405,0.000014199689,0.000009655995,0.00005781366,0.0032920113,0.00043215367,0.000049893322,0.00009320296,0.0015356704,0.000004855316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094227955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017352204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009182645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12816161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413958234","doi":"10.1111/agec.70061","title":"Correction to “Implications of Climate‐Smart Agriculture Technology Adoption on Women's Productivity and Food Security in Tanzania”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Food security; Productivity; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Economics; Agricultural productivity; Natural resource economics; Business; Economic growth; Geography; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.0037892102667859678,"score_gpt":0.180580023974466,"score_spread":0.17679081370768002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413958234","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000110910376,0.001089946,0.0004338949,0.09413798,0.9000053,0.000022012286,0.002214099,0.00030794487,0.0016779356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018337796,0.009646239,0.0034890645,0.21865343,0.5965544,0.00051056343,0.0052103377,0.0014761868,0.14612208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928843,0.0012455932,0.0012698843,0.0010756722,0.0026015686,0.0009230207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95559657,0.013391112,0.0020865477,0.0020407687,0.02517064,0.001714287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055299546,0.0038824088,0.0027361964,0.004331732,0.0049178903,0.004749595,0.0050881463,0.01049072,0.057216167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076631606,0.0016101617,0.0030098797,0.0037990347,0.0034328243,0.0033499252,0.004077317,0.018759951,0.028861362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018533905,0.0000033251113,0.000055539313,0.00008146516,0.0000065062177,0.000055686967,0.000046110195,0.000026186273,0.000019051682,0.00046940267,0.9977563,0.0014617771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059756367,0.000014843148,0.0013922794,0.00046556283,0.000030684405,0.0001354473,0.00017684302,0.00024100082,0.00019518367,0.0017337825,0.9954986,0.00005603621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067275636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05112424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067275636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068192896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008888944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19140714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}