{"meta":{"query_hash":"c850e2136e00","filters":{"venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c850e2136e00","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Agricultural+and+Resource+Economics+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1490569465","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500002173","title":"Modeling Exit and Entry of Farmers in a Crop Insurance Program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Risk Management Agency; University of Guelph","keywords":"Crop insurance; Moral hazard; Yield (engineering); Variance (accounting); Variable (mathematics); Economics; Business; Hazard; Actuarial science; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Microeconomics; Agriculture; Incentive; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.02010682863088439,"score_gpt":0.21405630645970472,"score_spread":0.19394947782882033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490569465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9269838,0.07097012,7.930046e-8,0.00088262686,0.000020132971,0.00046096017,0.000010543739,0.00002407402,0.00064767443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69209296,0.30754077,0.000049085127,0.0001243603,0.00004443982,0.000023268056,0.000017139604,5.888013e-7,0.00010735897],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988436,0.000051819134,0.00042878403,0.00034160158,0.00007897432,0.00025520823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999614,0.00005581622,0.00012742516,0.000041650335,0.000041632356,0.000119482014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013070024,0.0001943115,0.00042544614,0.000014177589,0.00015761037,0.000018967921,0.00015585829,0.00009391368,0.000016502887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002280074,0.00005835063,0.00009102808,0.0003327793,0.00014136576,0.00014444497,0.00009630028,0.00015577668,0.0000034578181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006262054,0.000373871,0.1637049,0.0012104538,0.0000563467,0.000018129125,0.0006464176,0.0012453765,0.010536914,0.0003201796,0.001162706,0.8206621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025092106,0.00019873405,0.97726357,0.001222235,0.000019407908,0.0002687787,0.00053823116,0.00042570004,0.0001350173,0.000038628645,0.019225564,0.00041323344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033096358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001937573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82024884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012491263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039044967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23794697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496786512","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500005839","title":"Farm Return and Land Price Effects from Environmental Standards and Stocking Density Restrictions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Stocking; Manure; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Land use; Economics; Production (economics); Manure management; Business; Environmental science; Agronomy; Geography; Ecology; Microeconomics; Forestry","score_opus":0.006846876525662389,"score_gpt":0.1855430621671337,"score_spread":0.17869618564147133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496786512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9569446,0.03857097,4.4056875e-7,0.0034447478,0.000048441707,0.00041405024,0.00019425833,0.000030944797,0.00035154348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8605958,0.13772485,0.000061665545,0.00102262,0.0003182431,0.000017321909,0.00016238772,0.0000019156296,0.000095180716],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884915,0.00005374049,0.00029980033,0.0004570849,0.00007271658,0.00026748856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993371,0.00017099014,0.00017187417,0.00005686142,0.000016607277,0.00024656733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017962798,0.00026258492,0.00041068942,0.000008306998,0.00046412653,0.00014027033,0.00010707922,0.0001268768,0.000028547995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002920679,0.00009482885,0.00008007166,0.00007595927,0.00010264662,0.00014785715,0.00018477882,0.00019404486,0.000005391698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012450173,0.0003241554,0.10853912,0.001169293,0.00059650623,0.00003333636,0.001734796,0.00005948155,0.057113327,0.004571471,0.0038152665,0.8219187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043700595,0.00017552773,0.8662843,0.0005237419,0.00010474531,0.00016124593,0.00024074886,0.000009787927,0.00026464465,0.00076917076,0.13054217,0.00048689937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010135635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010190157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8214319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010156724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064146893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38670084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531694784","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500001489","title":"A Review of Tariff Rate Quota Administration in Canadian Agriculture","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Administration (probate law); Economics; Aside; Agriculture; International economics; Business; Agricultural economics; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04707688810166765,"score_gpt":0.23239648458645878,"score_spread":0.18531959648479113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531694784","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006186184,0.97091913,5.442667e-8,0.0011951558,0.00015206459,0.0016813165,0.0009008052,0.000015252662,0.02507437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000012547994,0.9954448,0.000026754567,0.0022265352,0.0001568488,0.00015146495,0.0011202467,0.000035764457,0.00082508003],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519664,0.00010924459,0.0030604263,0.00093815743,0.000025563799,0.00066994457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973435,0.00008321897,0.0016093628,0.00048512174,0.000032395463,0.00044643282],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010860283,0.00073121785,0.0044863336,0.00023780772,0.00009353791,0.00008065408,0.00058382744,0.0005592147,0.0005600281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009874577,0.00054724,0.0008667218,0.0005420619,0.000077901466,0.0002385641,0.00007272486,0.00060230994,0.0005058258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004245274,0.00010009365,0.000071362556,0.48286328,0.0003509483,0.0000137773395,0.000040927956,0.000005523363,2.5026235e-8,0.0142239835,0.046795953,0.4555299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106426334,0.000036203426,0.00012844687,0.1689046,0.00018480902,0.00012352003,0.000006679838,0.0000013097799,6.505553e-8,0.00014545712,0.82975626,0.00060621963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012630869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020311859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046807935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024208888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535464504","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500005803","title":"Integrating Farmer Decision Making to Target Land Retirement Programs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Payment; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Conservation Reserve Program; Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Neutrality; Marginal cost; Marginal land; Actuarial science; Agricultural economics; Business; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Finance; Financial economics; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.017449617238550184,"score_gpt":0.22553440445605474,"score_spread":0.20808478721750456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535464504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809197,0.008877997,0.0000053812673,0.0075598275,0.00010738711,0.00069354015,0.000010091061,0.000048996073,0.001777088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90400076,0.07955526,0.0054887054,0.006578463,0.0013737454,0.00011756243,0.00034357188,0.000006254491,0.002535658],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989475,0.000018809153,0.00033944836,0.0003308154,0.00008701551,0.00027642038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996194,0.00003076896,0.000108355525,0.000050093648,0.00003711886,0.00015425189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020038357,0.00019507471,0.00030664084,0.000006857028,0.00032933144,0.000116078736,0.0001749993,0.00007792528,0.000076863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001158315,0.000032016844,0.000120010256,0.00015218361,0.00002425132,0.0000904538,0.000085677915,0.00012090833,0.00004428441],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011059007,0.000048846377,0.0012744609,0.00010566102,0.000020694531,0.0000037753132,0.000116170384,0.000042664047,0.00028242078,0.00054688065,0.00040471516,0.9971427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016202957,0.00025012193,0.03177658,0.0032122154,0.000023617344,0.00009197881,0.0001913458,0.000005027606,0.00006430386,0.0009293335,0.9629254,0.00036805996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011786506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077855715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047740745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000049125156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25329846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546678945","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500009564","title":"Documenting Food Safety Claims and Their Influence on Product Prices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic Research Service; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Food Safety Authority of Ireland; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Fluid ounce (US); Agribusiness; Product (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Price premium; Food safety; Agricultural science; Economics; Agricultural economics; Food science; Willingness to pay; Agriculture; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010927575846685193,"score_gpt":0.18099782843809056,"score_spread":0.17007025259140537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546678945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7896113,0.15787697,0.0000016039312,0.009974667,0.00008740462,0.0006179326,0.000059172162,0.000050449547,0.041720495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77612025,0.21778479,0.0001428574,0.0047982223,0.00028077405,0.00002410188,0.000053789354,0.000014735241,0.000780461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978888,0.000021688536,0.0008896941,0.0007902023,0.00002055333,0.0003890372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884075,0.00008487625,0.0005712107,0.00028839687,0.000031479703,0.00018327111],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060695154,0.0003838102,0.0008144705,0.00007213313,0.0002782578,0.00020192207,0.00026355777,0.00011298993,0.000033972934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058263697,0.00025097886,0.00015998668,0.00014107711,0.00006510381,0.0004631871,0.000102086306,0.00027547698,0.00007485313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015780008,0.0005068222,0.00941179,0.0027423222,0.0009025004,0.0000046904934,0.0021515193,0.00031572775,0.00030138835,0.6744869,0.02684293,0.28217563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052746164,0.00047666673,0.23115362,0.0008775303,0.00002951947,0.000088161134,0.00014744932,0.00001707405,0.00009308986,0.010726,0.7549903,0.0008731568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009347144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010972452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7281473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006339448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006575643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548789891","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500005736","title":"The Obligations of a Policy Economist","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yesterday; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014243733835400771,"score_gpt":0.2531532034148436,"score_spread":0.2389094695794428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548789891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4906317,0.061786905,0.0000011916329,0.12896097,0.00016044531,0.0003852764,0.000019695344,0.000027894006,0.31802592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5848968,0.3971963,0.000054889068,0.0036074324,0.00080381247,0.000033032356,0.000011633654,0.0000070016954,0.013389122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993908,0.000030209774,0.00025582864,0.00010879379,0.000024227884,0.0001901383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956006,0.000097224955,0.00010608405,0.000079927035,0.00002115258,0.00013557433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002900957,0.00006790911,0.00017696053,0.00001267281,0.0006673087,0.00003455798,0.0001510604,0.00003951142,0.000027359083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009895523,0.00003759303,0.00009408596,0.00005509588,0.000383864,0.00007907865,0.000027084208,0.000059163638,0.000039759478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013641951,0.000010979577,0.00003270904,0.000065296306,0.000017161221,8.55496e-8,0.0007852553,0.000017952943,0.0000022798154,0.971353,0.0020273142,0.025686592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008893575,0.000010141888,0.0019752418,0.00012383336,0.000012390994,0.000003366734,0.0007105588,3.9761005e-7,0.000004766361,0.010519371,0.9864775,0.00007351823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001538155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008725756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98445016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012761078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012378744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51324666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559063672","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500001866","title":"Willingness to Pay for Water Quality Improvements in the United States and Canada: Considering Possibilities for International Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Multinational corporation; Meta-analysis; Metadata; Quality (philosophy); Public economics; Preference; Conjoint analysis; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economics; Business; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09799953257580275,"score_gpt":0.2449804171513081,"score_spread":0.14698088457550534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559063672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98801154,0.0027991731,0.000073835596,0.0078596445,0.00006454114,0.0006872184,0.00046866573,0.0000024248934,0.00003298035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862288,0.008404596,0.00028164405,0.003742188,0.000046714886,0.00031275547,0.000512236,0.000008155819,0.0004628792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989715,0.000009774926,0.00055322394,0.0003047537,0.0000150246,0.00014568062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959534,0.00014862805,0.000088140856,0.00009823669,0.000018510647,0.000051168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008455119,0.0001298249,0.0005172,0.000045764245,0.00009898164,0.00007572742,0.00009213744,0.000039495397,0.000048361413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027700762,0.00006779219,0.0001323177,0.00003564431,0.000030568783,0.000100130856,0.000032539287,0.00006816537,7.6504347e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020110262,0.0003308968,0.7267864,0.005122374,0.050668564,0.0000011384925,0.016673379,0.009359154,0.0006073163,0.16882159,0.0023905332,0.019037591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001353816,0.00010543099,0.72930783,0.0000372733,0.0049739336,0.000007882363,0.0023585143,0.0019029747,0.00028069635,0.0131488005,0.24564387,0.00087900914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049405847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17160699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24325334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000395711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034100176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95692426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573012848","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500001799","title":"A Pseudo-Sequential Choice Model for Valuing Multi-Attribute Environmental Policies or Programs in Contingent Valuation Applications","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Southern Research Station; Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Transitive relation; Valuation (finance); Respondent; Contingent valuation; Econometrics; Economics; Axiom; Reflexivity; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1704723880183702,"score_gpt":0.2597597214091175,"score_spread":0.08928733339074732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573012848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98627025,0.007687951,0.0020452733,0.0011634327,0.000096998854,0.002359191,0.00018268535,0.000025384756,0.00016882387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680943,0.022779593,0.00410053,0.00070380775,0.00022830568,0.001490459,0.0008402317,0.00003114035,0.0017316608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983352,0.000015626476,0.00082714297,0.00049961405,0.000024203731,0.0002982481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991943,0.00005617385,0.0004465953,0.00019239222,0.000007485431,0.00010303427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067504914,0.00022133664,0.00046635166,0.00006147486,0.00017542852,0.00007860224,0.00017404885,0.00013309419,0.00006757635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003971929,0.00018296255,0.0001485185,0.00006573227,0.00008191151,0.00025939965,0.000084832915,0.00018386132,0.00006507684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063083375,0.0017655184,0.78027046,0.002695554,0.00045684422,8.7351486e-7,0.0036610386,0.01368366,0.003422079,0.061535195,0.0012984962,0.13114719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040522343,0.00017334071,0.7035913,0.0004314984,0.00016409706,0.000052615236,0.00061964226,0.15313067,0.000101032216,0.0026330685,0.13345987,0.0015906588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080450154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034911855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.139447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015871617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010752935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74609965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599101433","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500006043","title":"A Real Options Analysis of Automatic Milking Systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bunge (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Milking; Automatic milking; Investment (military); Computer science; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.023772276162066567,"score_gpt":0.2117138638742562,"score_spread":0.18794158771218963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599101433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52328336,0.46634164,0.000004853778,0.00020668351,0.00006589814,0.00020798617,0.000057507692,0.000017552193,0.009814522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28011075,0.71763134,0.00022115177,0.00012791713,0.000032263055,0.00003256491,0.000100740865,0.000009531518,0.0017337191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985373,0.000039072835,0.00091132906,0.00031031691,0.00002263094,0.00017932334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901134,0.000054957905,0.0005916569,0.00022012746,0.00002702005,0.00009492432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047831738,0.00016266196,0.0009975211,0.00022802602,0.00010168089,0.000057160527,0.00011645397,0.000072359784,0.00019298261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003763956,0.000118291944,0.00043142255,0.0006724998,0.000054425676,0.00011678616,0.000029439321,0.00007697204,0.000051028277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1612155e-7,0.0000453398,0.005139785,0.0005854223,0.0016128208,5.0162515e-7,0.00016535599,0.0010247291,0.000008707721,0.99030143,0.0007925529,0.0003227135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001631675,0.00027174823,0.3644552,0.003168121,0.012623057,0.00010748326,0.003067549,0.07027585,0.000054428758,0.014841023,0.526194,0.003309917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002926196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036724246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055043805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061168334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48238054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098586092","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500001532","title":"Policy Endogeneity and the Effects of Trade on the Environment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Economics; Work (physics); Sustainability; Natural resource economics; Natural resource; Porter hypothesis; Renewable resource; Environmental policy; Public economics; Renewable energy; Econometrics","score_opus":0.01225381639570382,"score_gpt":0.1734431066743683,"score_spread":0.16118929027866447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098586092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7826946,0.14674264,0.000003557261,0.05622853,0.000056424073,0.0008676965,0.00003909267,0.000010746252,0.01335672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67070603,0.32371342,0.000039133003,0.0046259877,0.00016929049,0.00007883081,0.000007198242,0.000013458775,0.00064663595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868774,0.00006654652,0.00062818744,0.0003735038,0.000021752727,0.00022223813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986847,0.00039521325,0.00049299246,0.00034328035,0.0000014833653,0.000082329534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000608919,0.00022168052,0.0005841136,0.00003574749,0.00015356764,0.00003380782,0.0002518956,0.00006990267,0.000059860995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095362964,0.00011522321,0.00017200275,0.00005100917,0.00030686797,0.000081577986,0.00013074728,0.00016446561,0.00008296623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016844402,0.000090203095,0.0013715243,0.00057797413,0.00023014518,3.8538474e-7,0.0003767413,0.0003715903,0.00005870479,0.97034615,0.002192107,0.024367599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002050708,0.00013972043,0.11121754,0.00043692804,0.00009091728,0.000041003877,0.0000933146,0.00023306222,0.00079210557,0.008094156,0.87622154,0.0005889929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044476277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000629247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008920958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038783705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4698666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099384363","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500002860","title":"The Implications of Skewed Risk Perception for a Dutch Coastal Land Market: Insights from an Agent-Based Computational Economics Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Risk perception; Amenity; Flood myth; Threatened species; Economic rent; Perception; Flooding (psychology); Land use; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental planning; Microeconomics; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.018071022566897348,"score_gpt":0.2201386028233027,"score_spread":0.20206758025640534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099384363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930903,0.0010004272,0.0012244068,0.0007837731,0.00003066273,0.00077935297,0.00015650335,0.000012964874,0.00292163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546658,0.034946103,0.008494235,0.00068402913,0.000051279472,0.00017899984,0.0005537164,0.000013871132,0.00041200526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992968,0.00004496072,0.00028558428,0.00023129677,0.000032722146,0.00010868057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947786,0.00007224078,0.00022907632,0.00014316679,0.000011983609,0.00006565155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015370254,0.000115608185,0.00016904157,0.00000876234,0.00025062053,0.000028317352,0.00016685347,0.000034538745,0.00008793505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050370677,0.00006477045,0.000084394975,0.00003116154,0.00008493514,0.00012788206,0.0000787608,0.00004831526,0.000009065228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039781033,0.0011734719,0.10360338,0.0007585245,0.00068742107,4.5844132e-7,0.0038399247,0.38154674,0.00040846964,0.0145639,0.049681652,0.44333825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052428665,0.00008745272,0.7934503,0.000063325446,0.0001715579,0.0000010287355,0.00023622873,0.16756058,0.000008753959,0.005956359,0.0317025,0.00023761464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033179924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024145097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68984693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041867374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072950907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26412624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101721556","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500007243","title":"Keep It Down: An Experimental Test of the Truncated<i>k</i>-Double Auction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Double auction; Market power; Economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Commodity; Industrial organization; Common value auction; Market economy; Monopoly","score_opus":0.04833953863955818,"score_gpt":0.3181115277824632,"score_spread":0.269771989142905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101721556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98534405,0.0025474464,0.000003875152,0.006222452,0.00020091243,0.00034780754,0.000013797404,0.000014804231,0.005304846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993546,0.0015729053,0.00005273985,0.00080697134,0.00019017863,0.00003781159,0.000010989805,0.0000043593627,0.0037780206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896675,0.000057033227,0.00047805853,0.00027859243,0.00011985074,0.000099723504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989771,0.00014547104,0.00033459673,0.00038005662,0.000077708726,0.00008503767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069684244,0.00010711604,0.00022565077,0.000018378114,0.00028254234,0.00007404126,0.00042973759,0.000060810573,0.00045121656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009872009,0.000047262365,0.00011979042,0.00022448156,0.00017279926,0.00022997844,0.000098983466,0.00016370478,0.00008254414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011210976,0.0015983902,0.0070015984,0.00036824273,0.00012232763,6.989843e-7,0.0040570246,0.0006781043,0.30647165,0.14743766,0.13616401,0.3959882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031622933,0.000060451446,0.015665276,0.0001079839,0.000037451275,0.00014047613,0.0016928773,0.000071812545,0.02410022,0.0025998808,0.95497316,0.00023420868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012111129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003402906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81880915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009857173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001173225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4940505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211473676","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500004603","title":"Consumer Perceptions of Eco-friendly and Sustainable Terms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Environmentally friendly; Business; Marketing; Green marketing; Perception; Sustainable products; Consumer behaviour; Product (mathematics); Sustainable development; Sustainability; Environmental economics; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.009504788374441717,"score_gpt":0.19927447499600862,"score_spread":0.1897696866215669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211473676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97584754,0.013651985,0.0000018941869,0.0029742315,0.0000332769,0.00043240577,0.0000026097441,0.000021231765,0.007034852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739694,0.020578671,0.00016437058,0.0021768587,0.00031218556,0.000051518,0.000084940744,0.000020331785,0.0026417437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992119,0.000010142918,0.00028384852,0.00022069352,0.000056212935,0.00021722045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956113,0.00002134132,0.00017303109,0.00013403804,0.00007676483,0.000033688546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032641954,0.00014905226,0.000297887,0.000038684488,0.00011917207,0.000087769666,0.0001064139,0.00005060285,0.000083060666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007566694,0.0000968933,0.000050634724,0.00011959553,0.00018421482,0.0005778265,0.00032017377,0.00007486976,0.000032573753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009535151,0.00061796355,0.56355304,0.04754965,0.00027912788,0.000027840282,0.0008460271,0.00042833237,0.0002821558,0.09725426,0.1568404,0.13222587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036695678,0.000016423735,0.22279736,0.0003129613,0.00012316849,0.000030964304,0.0036987034,0.00003025204,0.0000037396899,0.0007473786,0.7715868,0.00028530968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021699446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015481246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6147464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005262355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070250962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3951194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122996395","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500000162","title":"Agricultural Policy: High Commodity and Input Prices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Economic Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Commodity; Economics; Subsidy; Tariff; International economics; Boom; Agriculture; European union; Contango; Legislation; Agricultural economics; International trade; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Speculation","score_opus":0.012124440939389858,"score_gpt":0.1981021312046693,"score_spread":0.18597769026527944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122996395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92724836,0.023079608,6.269755e-7,0.029786626,0.00007048115,0.00033357594,0.0000073111714,0.00007223675,0.019401176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95322496,0.030251985,0.00004042782,0.01459552,0.0014645418,0.000011555205,0.00011544986,0.000006330934,0.00028925063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909794,0.000012197792,0.00027430107,0.00030098195,0.000065871915,0.00024869782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999581,0.000023267055,0.00019338327,0.00010793721,0.000056388275,0.000038023038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013234522,0.00023713881,0.0003954458,0.000039409693,0.00022704272,0.00029055082,0.00017913055,0.000066762805,0.000023360592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021488173,0.00013319803,0.00008183084,0.00022043753,0.00005792536,0.00058737985,0.00012991806,0.00012820229,0.00004898312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003526263,0.00024242973,0.008949961,0.0038429732,0.00015806855,0.000011321363,0.00010040489,0.000059945072,0.00030465037,0.7872425,0.026890647,0.17216185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020264713,0.000014969335,0.57166255,0.00051070226,0.00005880855,0.000034546767,0.00008003258,0.000006923291,0.000006429248,0.0015011808,0.4256559,0.0002653356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021717622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035756606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025257397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000058828623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5431658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139637663","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500007048","title":"Food Processors' Use of Contracts to Purchase Agricultural Inputs: Evidence from a Pennsylvania Survey","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Survey data collection; Business; Value (mathematics); Agriculture; Marketing; Agricultural economics; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06390852324328636,"score_gpt":0.23175132898257964,"score_spread":0.16784280573929328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139637663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8982641,0.09610204,0.000039151568,0.0021333713,0.00020958945,0.0010815037,0.00075522135,0.00004243626,0.0013725911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289711,0.066015825,0.0011477245,0.0025071427,0.00031661126,0.000054102424,0.0003780411,0.00003455866,0.0005748791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963249,0.00006141102,0.0019163117,0.0009972632,0.00006514498,0.0006349648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968959,0.00074874377,0.0011861345,0.00043838148,0.00021169972,0.0005191566],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017701058,0.0005233787,0.0014644691,0.00013577996,0.00015984935,0.00020487636,0.0005501974,0.00026620863,0.00009743512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010041257,0.00037113234,0.00030177028,0.00043881216,0.000095745505,0.000987758,0.00028090205,0.0003369397,0.00017992608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043759295,0.004112288,0.5214441,0.01395519,0.008736972,0.00007791621,0.014944709,0.0013336358,0.013669091,0.079157725,0.21155351,0.12663895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005067421,0.00044934568,0.8393763,0.0016130633,0.00006811339,0.000035445217,0.0001147979,0.0000060463008,0.0004245083,0.0003656732,0.1561396,0.0009004172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070118165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014864758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31793216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013794437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020466166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141983421","doi":"10.1017/s106828050000575x","title":"Socioeconomics of Individual Transferable Quotas and Community-Based Fishery Management","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Fisheries management; Enforcement; Business; Sustainability; Socioeconomic status; Government (linguistics); Fishery; Environmental resource management; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Ecology; Fishing; Population","score_opus":0.01821996425941817,"score_gpt":0.2124771820903631,"score_spread":0.19425721783094493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141983421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323669,0.001801578,0.000003728296,0.002856761,0.000013359975,0.00037970147,0.00001793503,0.000010612986,0.06254939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72351235,0.25998408,0.0028666104,0.009353924,0.00008957403,0.00015482742,0.00037892358,0.00004632341,0.003613353],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926335,0.000079525504,0.0002597279,0.0001654678,0.000062406354,0.00016950043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996547,0.000041773004,0.00006196009,0.000146053,0.0000042277625,0.000091258175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045916773,0.00012423046,0.00025762233,0.000013574618,0.0002032479,0.000039748207,0.00021007782,0.000050203587,0.00040142782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004315441,0.000085634674,0.00006061998,0.000059740232,0.00020527051,0.000114686874,0.00023411823,0.00023368438,0.000013908468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077083736,0.0007260306,0.042451873,0.010536627,0.0004485734,0.000009462811,0.0027715722,0.0021719737,0.00016541469,0.003996374,0.0134278005,0.92321724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012594844,0.00025929682,0.084761135,0.0003830854,0.00012386126,0.000031544187,0.0011614555,0.000021662367,0.00012802523,0.0007725988,0.91063756,0.00046031008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020416485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009922637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053464388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048475513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43953532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143552630","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500007280","title":"Ambient-Based Policy Instruments: The Role of Recommendations and Presentation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Economic Research Service; W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Stochastic game; Presentation (obstetrics); Table (database); Test (biology); Environmental policy; Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Environmental economics; Data mining","score_opus":0.01547077637322717,"score_gpt":0.2992001456490958,"score_spread":0.2837293692758686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143552630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582186,0.008464152,5.4192412e-8,0.023072828,0.000064806125,0.00037827066,0.000014272654,0.000009621581,0.009777417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419338,0.056895673,0.00012611262,0.0006324375,0.00010127533,0.000044773722,0.000021804259,0.0000037401244,0.00024038609],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994592,0.00005562624,0.00021284302,0.00012695733,0.0000337656,0.0001115811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996247,0.000059240036,0.00015324415,0.00007685263,0.000027735003,0.00005822095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021954077,0.00007563755,0.00014897327,0.00001868719,0.00037628214,0.00004583217,0.000107293425,0.00003705865,0.000036211946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004260451,0.00004476488,0.00004219355,0.000071704075,0.00026809337,0.00012713566,0.00006475916,0.000089798436,0.000003956251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013109629,0.00020965953,0.040031504,0.00024667406,0.00010595248,1.0716662e-7,0.01080448,0.0000058684373,0.0090399,0.21176459,0.0038190833,0.7239591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033962965,0.000049274604,0.0452353,0.0003035854,0.000075854645,0.000004429329,0.015306384,0.000020844092,0.0024790335,0.0013561294,0.9345603,0.00026920595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017772221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001420844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93074125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029677545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025169513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2894096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153073341","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500006717","title":"Price Dynamics in the North American Wheat Market","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Economics; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Error correction model; Structural break","score_opus":0.009127502902233204,"score_gpt":0.18441894148610702,"score_spread":0.1752914385838738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153073341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8350647,0.026991604,0.000012885636,0.0060874852,0.00006409972,0.00053903763,0.00014037869,0.000018631787,0.13108116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92472816,0.06962611,0.00014972858,0.002333822,0.00017979176,0.00007401071,0.00023483287,0.00001936755,0.0026541757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983233,0.00006499242,0.00079812563,0.00045239244,0.000029249548,0.00033194385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905866,0.00012945311,0.0004173275,0.00031502306,0.00001807136,0.0000614378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008946423,0.00023163986,0.00060693803,0.000059331534,0.00012775094,0.00010882233,0.0003370575,0.00005114282,0.00008998959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003896082,0.00014963617,0.00014796868,0.00038751276,0.0001072519,0.00012982388,0.0000825112,0.0002501731,0.000025413252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014020152,0.00013510422,0.902691,0.0006080826,0.000035708683,0.00000385284,0.000079978345,0.000031771673,1.4760245e-7,0.06695203,0.01778513,0.0116631985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013855375,0.00002363364,0.76237804,0.00007457216,0.000009100245,0.000023163817,0.000087474305,0.0057624956,3.712057e-8,0.0013988991,0.2298482,0.00025580445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001155979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005741627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21206307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017556564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067236706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61019856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164012275","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500007012","title":"Taxing Food to Improve Health: Economic Evidence and Arguments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Florida State University","keywords":"Public economics; Economics; Psychological intervention; Public health interventions; Public health; Positive economics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.026314502975269268,"score_gpt":0.2810981864439696,"score_spread":0.25478368346870034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164012275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423601,0.046927348,0.0000015058796,0.009034588,0.000087422864,0.0009279283,0.000010640957,0.00002673105,0.0006237363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428326,0.051278416,0.00018630571,0.0048453133,0.00037979727,0.000019720908,0.000011989025,0.000013414725,0.00043246252],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986784,0.000031796106,0.00043031576,0.00045087285,0.000059388636,0.00034921677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998976,0.00014261332,0.0001895318,0.00018276411,0.000025354277,0.00048373008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005117858,0.0002177376,0.00064212614,0.00003279857,0.00012228821,0.000043027518,0.00008780235,0.000059540926,0.000016996522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056218287,0.00014061884,0.000100319325,0.00006369633,0.0000447824,0.00017082976,0.00017916666,0.0001882029,0.000067173554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017691663,0.0020717413,0.08175643,0.022003846,0.00079558184,0.00001820363,0.0009820329,0.00002512361,0.002445775,0.005481135,0.022316394,0.8619268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064695935,0.0013442864,0.86505693,0.0060575255,0.00015341953,0.00017371419,0.0001622245,0.000018591456,0.0006416179,0.00016959276,0.12508109,0.0004940753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007430434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001058531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86143273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020304794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025172749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.573427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241420186","doi":"","title":"Special issue on agricultural policy. Selected papers from the 2008 annual meetings of the Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association (NAREA) and the Canadian Agricultural Economics Society (CAES), Québec City, Québec, Canada, 29 June-1 July 2008.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0053372712455473335,"score_gpt":0.16685914149909126,"score_spread":0.16152187025354392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241420186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7567095,0.0072747846,2.1894737e-9,0.22662571,0.00025576906,0.0011763206,0.001056643,0.000030601503,0.006870668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89235115,0.05110398,0.000015087967,0.028312523,0.014277515,0.00009512713,0.00110292,0.000017320855,0.012724375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958781,0.00039696932,0.0013528947,0.0010093291,0.00027418774,0.0010885396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636626,0.000945424,0.0014612172,0.00027386565,0.0003305776,0.00062262744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007223493,0.00094889925,0.0013030195,0.000021039394,0.0023367032,0.00045877855,0.001077804,0.0005154555,0.00008759479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024936482,0.00028356872,0.00060020725,0.0005115844,0.0004761698,0.0003588359,0.00034662572,0.0009800667,0.000014812448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015245366,0.00010792188,0.010176059,0.00011024628,0.00081479206,0.0000014075125,0.0039567254,0.00056988857,0.00028975628,0.001771132,0.93729997,0.04474964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004455006,0.00007174476,0.4664033,0.00016106317,0.00015972479,0.000065135544,0.0019101758,0.000010940156,0.000026359683,0.000024175917,0.5302081,0.00051376224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9167465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45622724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014438728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004969215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736376566","doi":"10.1017/age.2017.16","title":"Heterogeneous Preferences for Oysters: Evidence from Field Experiments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Alberta","funders":"Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Preference; Oyster; Logit; Mixed logit; Economics; Econometrics; Consumer choice; Logistic regression; Fishery; Microeconomics; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19557497690984496,"score_gpt":0.26724498973938643,"score_spread":0.07167001282954147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736376566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8841705,0.11055644,0.00004517558,0.0021513754,0.00021580623,0.0005094458,0.00008853681,0.000011738161,0.0022509955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8909511,0.10640764,0.00040292417,0.0010252364,0.00019333545,0.00014137065,0.000057154793,0.000010892717,0.0008103597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988412,0.000010854189,0.00050038553,0.00045369292,0.000013759582,0.0001801077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988849,0.00010448258,0.0005680726,0.00035039076,0.000007224434,0.00008493556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002472455,0.00016911262,0.00043958,0.000015857559,0.00032108725,0.00019378804,0.0003356085,0.00008611823,0.0002812046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001015819,0.00013544124,0.00014067144,0.00000841586,0.000052327727,0.0004154376,0.00013237377,0.000065137385,0.00017970159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016004955,0.00031842504,0.71586674,0.0031939088,0.0012804564,0.0000035909993,0.00261005,0.00044342238,0.00050226937,0.012704607,0.038563494,0.224353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014433485,0.000451101,0.74269676,0.0036393097,0.0001319699,0.000022324639,0.0003092472,0.0006408565,0.0018312797,0.010260376,0.23709199,0.0014814556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002524998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032926575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22287154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058860875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033536717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5523133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736778087","doi":"10.1017/age.2017.21","title":"Consumer Preferences for Oyster Attributes: Field Experiments on Brand, Locality, and Growing Method","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Oyster; Aquaculture; Fishery; Preference; Business; Production (economics); Marketing; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.17305865607857993,"score_gpt":0.29283984894195686,"score_spread":0.11978119286337693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736778087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92118853,0.062396824,0.00030159997,0.0064122668,0.00023978563,0.0009601796,0.00013757026,0.0000163732,0.008346877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90766823,0.083920576,0.0012169069,0.0049115936,0.00019560453,0.00019040062,0.00009080173,0.000020602165,0.0017852578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988449,0.0000198859,0.00048665938,0.00044518238,0.000014523684,0.00018881004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909115,0.00014298494,0.0004230884,0.00024466545,0.0000074496324,0.000090643865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054686546,0.00018299794,0.000510598,0.00002316691,0.00037261058,0.00017629817,0.00017941174,0.00009842509,0.000103174236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078999976,0.00013968622,0.000108987944,0.0000104573555,0.00006322915,0.0003520125,0.0001190057,0.00008802991,0.00006821256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016749061,0.00031993113,0.4546964,0.004854981,0.001091623,0.0000018815495,0.0011703824,0.00017511635,0.00014380194,0.14681908,0.033502348,0.35705698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002575393,0.00042684795,0.43850964,0.0015526281,0.00012187151,0.000031892167,0.00039611713,0.00057038025,0.00080091343,0.009821895,0.5440027,0.0011896889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007352858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010141613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5105004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004290576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002770304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5696239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740070219","doi":"10.1017/age.2017.18","title":"Tourist Viewshed Externalities and Wind Energy Production","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Economic Research Service; University of Delaware; Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Viewshed analysis; Externality; Tourism; Turbine; Business; Wind power; Production (economics); Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Advertising; Environmental economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.020155074271939844,"score_gpt":0.2613708296867053,"score_spread":0.24121575541476542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740070219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7998463,0.13758878,6.4217426e-7,0.018474853,0.00042806938,0.00022092632,0.0000030865976,0.000036951697,0.04340041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23687379,0.73200876,0.00007141266,0.0007148938,0.001821134,0.000021149554,0.0000073637825,0.000008862494,0.028472612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913645,0.00009121074,0.00020847817,0.00027745657,0.000078823556,0.0002075643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993383,0.00003262444,0.00028153203,0.00017523453,0.000047701516,0.00012457959],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037603648,0.00013023791,0.0003000984,0.000012518031,0.0014809229,0.00033070648,0.00023474923,0.000077109806,0.00005981278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019207443,0.00008790735,0.00006690165,0.000030806,0.00037731678,0.00040371547,0.00009832831,0.00006389131,0.000003987962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006940762,0.0000219571,0.0020799334,0.00035576095,0.00006246226,0.0000020677126,0.0018443271,0.000009541844,0.00006161683,0.03574698,0.02249438,0.93731403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008085129,0.00001050258,0.021431107,0.0005155227,0.00003280385,0.000008907631,0.002314801,7.322481e-7,0.000036404235,0.0011799666,0.97419244,0.00019594708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004739601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072345217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95169806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051062114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022249571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978124686","doi":"10.1017/age.2019.21","title":"Willingness to Pay, Quality Perception, and Local Foods: The Case of Broccoli","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Quality (philosophy); Perception; Variety (cybernetics); Taste; Consumer demand; Price premium; Business; Marketing; Economics; Food quality; Food science; Psychology; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.013934694033195694,"score_gpt":0.22097078331648262,"score_spread":0.20703608928328693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978124686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728364,0.009121355,3.079612e-7,0.017017692,0.000054119657,0.00056802435,0.000039318318,0.000017994076,0.0003448163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855016,0.012162246,0.000014209212,0.0015892506,0.00016973416,0.000012663979,0.000027663718,0.0000010156327,0.00052164414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989238,0.000102258535,0.000384248,0.00033616036,0.000056931083,0.00019659495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941,0.00015488447,0.00015810481,0.00007615397,0.00006360476,0.00013728248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033008945,0.00018768023,0.00039741342,0.000003351157,0.0001861922,0.000052201656,0.00017191748,0.00009202776,0.00015993527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002166102,0.000041739164,0.000105786814,0.00019045503,0.000079171645,0.000088444365,0.00015199895,0.00014679728,0.000030780993],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043423577,0.00013443478,0.0054684947,0.0017290915,0.00011945839,0.000009868551,0.0009817128,0.000029870056,0.03712931,0.0026619886,0.016307227,0.9353851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021006043,0.00038964686,0.5585123,0.00080501696,0.00008102275,0.0011533952,0.0076535726,0.000010530902,0.00023340393,0.00011819749,0.4303093,0.0005235756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032488795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064169994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93486154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016488459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034808152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17511791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979182473","doi":"10.1017/age.2019.15","title":"A Risk Management Tool or an Investment Strategy? Understanding the Unstable Farm Insurance Demand via a Gain-Loss Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Subsidy; Risk management; Revenue; Business; Demand management; Revenue management; Volatility (finance); Payment; Public economics; Economics; Investment (military); Government (linguistics); Actuarial science; Finance","score_opus":0.02143337777666717,"score_gpt":0.21960502145425675,"score_spread":0.19817164367758958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979182473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97301084,0.020998243,0.000015783058,0.0013957231,0.00010718611,0.0014323314,0.000038001257,0.00006035431,0.0029415365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83006114,0.16534628,0.00012381678,0.0021068903,0.00019644802,0.00006940891,0.00005591529,0.0000026155747,0.0020374644],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797744,0.00021385441,0.00049457786,0.00063735596,0.00018249743,0.0004942694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895316,0.00031524862,0.00033333033,0.00016797656,0.00003861014,0.00019164664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004933361,0.0003742211,0.0004723569,0.000008812121,0.000693571,0.00023842884,0.0005127357,0.00014706749,0.00018204573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023128949,0.00008886074,0.0001640311,0.00038253784,0.00013101884,0.00026668547,0.0001946758,0.00035568132,0.00007444436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004904797,0.0008268465,0.08290605,0.0033515845,0.0010075375,0.000068847694,0.0020131834,0.007439416,0.002877313,0.10940499,0.0070900717,0.7825237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073774706,0.0013549873,0.7372055,0.004821494,0.00039363766,0.000517719,0.014303223,0.00046158498,0.00009471497,0.012004134,0.22587389,0.0022313383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010649281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028836017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78029233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010482089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006730629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5334458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124401841","doi":"10.1017/age.2020.24","title":"Hedonic Pricing of Rice Attributes, Market Sorting, and Gains from Quality Improvement in the Beninese Market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Economic surplus; Economics; Valuation (finance); Microeconomics; Sorting; Econometrics; Partial equilibrium; Quality (philosophy); Commodity; Agricultural economics; General equilibrium theory; Mathematics; Welfare","score_opus":0.029414786578826135,"score_gpt":0.23255627326618405,"score_spread":0.20314148668735793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124401841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75818586,0.20885293,0.0000027831586,0.005158993,0.00008428429,0.00043166446,0.00020179927,0.000010440261,0.02707124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7210632,0.27376154,0.000275357,0.0028920586,0.00019740414,0.000062424435,0.0001959654,0.000018212266,0.001533824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973542,0.00011333216,0.0014908802,0.0006645579,0.000038271704,0.0003387675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811596,0.00042160338,0.0009352286,0.00037253025,0.00005121662,0.00010347934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016979114,0.00029742834,0.0010089723,0.000048769376,0.00012224923,0.00010887562,0.00029868886,0.00013925358,0.00021470887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002305777,0.0001965829,0.00020563517,0.00022380674,0.000072203824,0.00022790977,0.0002493206,0.0002797071,0.000009493371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035764105,0.002218635,0.44189414,0.020945994,0.0029671828,0.00007951875,0.007134789,0.00009373924,0.0024371976,0.17373349,0.2252241,0.12291358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078230293,0.00007681501,0.8604096,0.00064896117,0.00006215302,0.000040190032,0.00096484105,0.000050322655,0.000068285306,0.0049046334,0.13143794,0.0005539625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044234362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033565823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41851544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007428453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001834826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8016418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140000213","doi":"10.1017/age.2021.6","title":"Bidding behavior in auctions versus posted prices: comparisons of mean and marginal effects","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Bidding; Economics; Willingness to pay; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Product (mathematics); Order (exchange); Sample (material); Preference; Incentive; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07385619525692122,"score_gpt":0.22830050451288258,"score_spread":0.15444430925596137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140000213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.919321,0.077320926,0.000004519405,0.0005131721,0.00011336336,0.00025125823,0.000031249147,0.0000064915685,0.0024380337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8876425,0.111256346,0.00047492774,0.00017092095,0.000040140483,0.00004431961,0.00010730459,0.000010091844,0.00025343284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998972,0.000021845894,0.0005381634,0.00030999255,0.000012945441,0.0001450395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994479,0.00008107568,0.00027869252,0.00011668636,0.000008379056,0.0000672678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021529388,0.00013043499,0.00048235172,0.00005078554,0.0000652637,0.000026959178,0.000062358034,0.000066558576,0.00007657208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027587597,0.00011850313,0.0000770952,0.0001012247,0.00005410928,0.00014677201,0.00007916276,0.00010943591,0.000028860159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010063607,0.00092572137,0.82619476,0.00676422,0.00060928654,0.000021149775,0.0018120507,0.0014436801,0.00084053894,0.09704238,0.0031476435,0.06109791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096328853,0.00006897758,0.9775426,0.0004339992,0.000060222523,0.000029052628,0.0003741919,0.00022725586,0.00007880433,0.00009530678,0.019857181,0.00026915624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049706152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009428302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15134777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008442459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006053606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48324174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160013538","doi":"10.1017/age.2021.9","title":"Joint adoption of rice technologies among Bolivian farmers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Government of Canada; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; Government of the United Kingdom; European Commission; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Productivity; Business; Agricultural machinery; Agriculture; Production (economics); Emerging technologies; Agricultural productivity; Marketing; Agricultural economics; Resource (disambiguation); Agricultural science; Economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.026154881483549306,"score_gpt":0.21314844782479947,"score_spread":0.18699356634125017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160013538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94395226,0.04325358,2.9370608e-7,0.008832166,0.00004919848,0.00021080046,0.000025290494,0.00006371869,0.0036127102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8590237,0.13891341,0.00016895484,0.0004893211,0.0001068059,0.00002625473,0.00031738033,0.0000011281747,0.00095302804],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890184,0.000067882735,0.0004539016,0.0003059092,0.00007815212,0.00019232063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999215,0.0001118595,0.00038043477,0.000067864254,0.00017224086,0.0000526057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021887878,0.0001746084,0.0003714148,0.000009542207,0.000186057,0.000062461906,0.00014318737,0.00012403518,0.00015075842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009163444,0.000054895838,0.0001349014,0.00047597362,0.00009913622,0.0002793459,0.00013774582,0.00017683703,0.00001513969],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013984893,0.0002526288,0.0072380914,0.0017040025,0.00023214972,0.0000099503895,0.00015494652,0.000020473855,0.19442338,0.005629391,0.01955039,0.7707706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009843226,0.0000970804,0.5946606,0.0009212223,0.00010158443,0.00013620938,0.005130473,0.0000057742645,0.0041735913,0.00018251233,0.39408222,0.00041031634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007824809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009258974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7703603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019424991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054951897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22385873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208840980","doi":"10.1017/age.2021.22","title":"Dynamics of farm entry and exit in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Census; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Production (economics); Panel data; Economics; Longevity; Business; Agricultural science; Demographic economics; Geography; Econometrics; Population; Biology; Demography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.008712902890982924,"score_gpt":0.1744676547669325,"score_spread":0.16575475187594957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208840980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508311,0.03521087,1.2003717e-8,0.01042026,0.000036860154,0.000146389,0.0000886539,0.00000468737,0.0032611736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72099924,0.27670425,0.00001818182,0.0014146047,0.00009639668,0.000009279987,0.00024453434,9.861787e-7,0.0005125476],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900085,0.000043872806,0.00041454198,0.00027964465,0.000041876654,0.00021924255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995158,0.00011416693,0.0001614969,0.000045005265,0.00003763736,0.00012592114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000097873366,0.00016280322,0.0004295864,0.000007329837,0.0000621885,0.000027352793,0.000112532245,0.00006078227,0.00010041708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020907179,0.00005774816,0.000063644795,0.00021013587,0.00003375421,0.000057232675,0.00013019516,0.000119753255,0.0000017864429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002025438,0.000108141074,0.07289285,0.0014332592,0.00012022945,0.00002576628,0.0001260747,0.00006829678,0.0039090915,0.0176778,0.007939559,0.8956787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022290226,0.000043836822,0.83294874,0.0007535363,0.000036336656,0.00020322873,0.0014311549,0.000097840224,0.00025257264,0.0003103327,0.16324554,0.00045399083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23057829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9099924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8952247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101029276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039671566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7745454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313528700","doi":"10.1017/age.2022.22","title":"Does plant-based milk reduce sales of dairy milk? Evidence from the almond milk craze","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Booth School of Business, University of Chicago; University of Chicago","keywords":"Gallon (US); Dairy industry; Business; Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Economics; Food science; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.017947444382125064,"score_gpt":0.22333802165842115,"score_spread":0.2053905772762961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313528700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96689844,0.018664144,7.3370495e-7,0.013308954,0.000084842744,0.0005864249,0.00013322585,0.000038622748,0.0002846034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8743573,0.120865695,0.00015121317,0.002048726,0.00020566092,0.00007169092,0.0004059297,0.00001935595,0.0018744427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836236,0.00015764721,0.0004723688,0.00049299217,0.00017299649,0.0003416311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874234,0.00051011535,0.0002376626,0.00034686035,0.000006939735,0.0001560881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043653417,0.00028362908,0.0004233934,0.000011100598,0.00025459842,0.00004050931,0.00045576593,0.00010771648,0.0004170579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012056914,0.00010758764,0.00019787406,0.00024533193,0.00042756,0.00025230763,0.00032889083,0.00019924947,0.00024666006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026651577,0.00046668167,0.23383284,0.0037265467,0.00040975414,0.000047115056,0.0067048674,0.012755735,0.031626705,0.00007730452,0.62258023,0.08750572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002230798,0.00007430379,0.8256298,0.0015253373,0.00013377544,0.00001618042,0.0021395483,0.00009596906,0.0017554143,0.0001596516,0.16783996,0.00040699303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071090873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002839522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59179693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013937111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009528334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45664915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367852870","doi":"10.1017/age.2023.10","title":"Residential mobility and the value of water quality improvements in the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Redevelopment; Environmental remediation; Environmental science; Wildlife; Water quality; Pollutant; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Geography; Business; Ecology; Civil engineering; Engineering; Contamination","score_opus":0.03926639569065836,"score_gpt":0.30583564628892285,"score_spread":0.2665692505982645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367852870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963458,0.026956793,4.5771387e-8,0.0077774823,0.000029948467,0.0005255185,0.00001010995,0.000003460563,0.0012386681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73957485,0.25936517,0.0000020876369,0.0007978181,0.0000359787,0.000025924192,0.000010555265,0.0000014209921,0.00018615954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988985,0.00036025918,0.00038215166,0.000121457175,0.00009186754,0.00014576734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944246,0.00030292833,0.00012066038,0.00009477519,0.00001013297,0.000029070916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002212481,0.000065047716,0.00025878896,0.000008479387,0.00018139914,0.000015862588,0.00015028629,0.000039341838,0.000018960922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053507276,0.000025489056,0.00005579785,0.000058092555,0.0005705166,0.00006708569,0.00009194389,0.00008187301,0.0000027614278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060049177,0.00067398616,0.23124415,0.06229903,0.00044884215,0.000006347071,0.3886597,0.00028945276,0.0012981151,0.19397081,0.019894214,0.100614876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071914686,0.00004094598,0.91443735,0.00093565386,0.00010061355,0.0000014433194,0.058684655,0.000010550943,0.00008310638,0.0015210159,0.023327138,0.00013838471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004982168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002015347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6831932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001906125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010879193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75315803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391814637","doi":"10.1017/age.2024.1","title":"Do people value farmers markets: A spatial hedonic pricing model approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Externality; Hedonic pricing; Willingness to pay; Property value; Residential property; Value (mathematics); Economics; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Quality (philosophy); Business; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Econometrics; Economic geography","score_opus":0.04060638006134022,"score_gpt":0.1980584081606927,"score_spread":0.1574520280993525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391814637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6288243,0.3142409,0.0018695907,0.0025758648,0.000309208,0.0008946476,0.00012262992,0.00009551519,0.051067352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81022763,0.18498407,0.0007472577,0.0008915334,0.00020951772,0.00010027991,0.00017199216,0.000037485235,0.002630203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998108,0.000027331327,0.00078043586,0.00073215825,0.000028229342,0.0003238085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935865,0.000049135364,0.00022654621,0.00022670128,0.000005989473,0.00013296273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007375904,0.00028553844,0.00062469445,0.00007954295,0.00015442695,0.00019207595,0.0001916138,0.00012712272,0.0002341931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020657613,0.00022864921,0.00024469462,0.00012784025,0.000054083677,0.00032718902,0.00013364959,0.00023224673,0.0004384934],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055803273,0.0004777174,0.0467194,0.015881766,0.0015246946,0.000007258436,0.005301284,0.07769257,0.000063458276,0.53854865,0.03918902,0.2745384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011142691,0.00013723582,0.13325125,0.0023324578,0.00029892902,0.00026303416,0.0012166207,0.511159,0.000010811281,0.011357065,0.33643338,0.0024259775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011295416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007964069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5271916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002587688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014856601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9324044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392863744","doi":"10.1017/age.2024.4","title":"The effects of a universal income transfer on food insecurity within households","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Food insecurity; Economics; Household income; Food security; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Public economics; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.051964700666322354,"score_gpt":0.3268497688083742,"score_spread":0.2748850681420518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392863744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90487695,0.08462677,7.849914e-7,0.006545134,0.00062414346,0.0010965619,0.00005222545,0.000060083777,0.002117371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653128,0.13264532,0.000008230004,0.0012664343,0.0001636748,0.000057483794,0.000019334795,0.000010731313,0.0005159634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986816,0.00030082988,0.0005053289,0.00020768441,0.00007119243,0.00023335335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986457,0.0009699716,0.00008433886,0.00015199975,0.000035483754,0.0001125001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004942351,0.00014308069,0.0003145662,0.000026886699,0.000708076,0.00001689615,0.0001424323,0.00014042751,0.000019953783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007534572,0.00007176092,0.000111156114,0.00015489328,0.000085379026,0.00008449837,0.000060479128,0.00057300826,0.00004287868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009597156,0.00009878281,0.0022435398,0.068478376,0.00038621415,0.000006925901,0.015891373,0.000038778184,0.000032737433,0.87523645,0.022454998,0.015035828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068604713,0.00078743853,0.045676034,0.025413927,0.0002337486,0.00001093857,0.0016058439,0.00007949463,0.000028785384,0.0020628253,0.92306286,0.00035206767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065922155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034826086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079066354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000677703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.544602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406773413","doi":"10.1017/age.2024.15","title":"The effect of commodity index trading in agricultural futures markets: a Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVAR) approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ste. Anne's Hospital","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Futures contract; Index (typography); Autoregressive model; Economics; Econometrics; Vector autoregression; Commodity; Financial economics; Futures market; Agriculture; Computer science; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.009697983662150295,"score_gpt":0.20943324518667306,"score_spread":0.19973526152452276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406773413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8852627,0.09532439,0.000013761352,0.0012492683,0.00022531845,0.0010328254,0.00015866724,0.000020651441,0.016712382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97754765,0.021417761,0.000021140515,0.000115530835,0.000056351375,0.000093734234,0.00007706182,0.000008779764,0.00066200807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978906,0.00017592781,0.0010531475,0.0005005599,0.000038410602,0.00034136057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849373,0.0004655989,0.0006181636,0.00030890986,0.000029490144,0.00008407978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010978582,0.00033173614,0.0010236127,0.00008375024,0.0002728894,0.00010730727,0.0004009596,0.00016908269,0.000034763416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018543458,0.00017989926,0.0002804702,0.00029109558,0.00013307117,0.00014298235,0.00016381056,0.0003780147,0.0000022081667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051081483,0.00032822028,0.817033,0.011863497,0.001237089,0.00000341348,0.0009368809,0.00010902213,0.000047182177,0.064284325,0.017419538,0.086227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081255205,0.00006659778,0.95359576,0.00085609045,0.00003369556,0.000008474812,0.00017361421,0.0065353825,0.000013863551,0.0006495614,0.03691579,0.00033859324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012933605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000097473094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13656276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017433178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012084248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7336079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61881027","doi":"10.1017/s1068280500004974","title":"Consumer Preferences for Peach Attributes: Market Segmentation Analysis and Implications for New Marketing Strategies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Resource Economics Review","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vineland Research and Innovation Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Market segmentation; Purchasing; Marketing; Conjoint analysis; Business; Quality (philosophy); Consumer demand; Market analysis; Key (lock); Economics; Microeconomics; Preference; Computer science","score_opus":0.025444144251281938,"score_gpt":0.23203528301913753,"score_spread":0.2065911387678556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61881027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93251175,0.041819256,0.000018818475,0.02284623,0.000032258096,0.0020896876,0.0003001319,0.000050044935,0.00033182694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8400093,0.1466036,0.0025727304,0.0017551022,0.0008760965,0.0010926293,0.003269697,0.000005035307,0.003815806],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897563,0.000053238327,0.00033281228,0.0003745923,0.000034761088,0.00022895294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990057,0.00051428506,0.00020310235,0.000043923235,0.00008882468,0.00014418701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025382164,0.00018850477,0.00037092055,0.00001055911,0.00026831703,0.00027807304,0.00013230344,0.00008992919,0.00018764347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052790157,0.0000631353,0.00016371056,0.00022924838,0.000036799855,0.00025792862,0.000047377365,0.00006162834,0.0000027669817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002268869,0.00005165672,0.009272222,0.0007294323,0.0005965788,4.1079304e-8,0.00011832025,0.0000049642385,0.015129519,0.0005125666,0.17979698,0.793765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015649736,0.00008939861,0.8701662,0.00015374976,0.00046386675,0.000007944633,0.0010554049,0.000016319016,0.000054597458,0.0004745291,0.12709066,0.00027084586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010488044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033294057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86089396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001512081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007645366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26814646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}