{"meta":{"query_hash":"41cb167e071e","filters":{"venue":"Albany law review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/41cb167e071e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Albany+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W113091862","doi":"","title":"The Archaeological Duty of Care: The Legal, Professional, and Cultural Struggle over Salvaging Historic Shipwrecks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasure; Law; Cultural heritage; History; Adventure; Archaeology; Sociology; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.025589614694440706,"score_gpt":0.26962616175615123,"score_spread":0.24403654706171052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W113091862","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08697985,0.68506837,0.0000021902044,0.023765203,0.0009771347,0.0009581104,0.000021141039,0.00005757861,0.2021704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90231186,0.07888812,0.000018160665,0.004181426,0.00032612,0.00008256623,0.000015899554,0.000011870905,0.014163998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892104,0.00020378576,0.00029679819,0.00017223104,0.00017239252,0.00023376437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924946,0.00025570166,0.0001151419,0.00024100898,0.00009640213,0.000042300282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002601627,0.00013697414,0.0002724726,0.000008911128,0.0006915172,0.000027514901,0.00025772382,0.000028939452,0.0010635873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042801148,0.000059297803,0.00010724942,0.00003812317,0.0015130631,0.00011933351,0.00029306125,0.00021731539,0.00001444133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014679513,0.000016305543,0.0003242271,0.00038131088,0.000021520651,0.000006654079,0.003179391,3.80972e-8,0.000004186017,0.96722096,0.01134759,0.01748311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088593115,0.00007191875,0.00034166288,0.00037672446,0.000045476256,0.000026484626,0.0006367708,0.0000021828125,0.0000030430358,0.004393281,0.99392277,0.00009112043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017264257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072449096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019744844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026809814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171915381","doi":"","title":"Public Perception of Wrongful Conviction: Support for Compensation and Apologies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Compensation (psychology); Innocence; Criminal justice; Financial compensation; Statute; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Public defender; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11549925322408323,"score_gpt":0.3706843843306582,"score_spread":0.255185131106575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171915381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56080806,0.20477651,0.015062698,0.032632004,0.0035044258,0.004874047,0.00006626487,0.00039871875,0.17787725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564952,0.04235025,0.0002826865,0.00047152778,0.00014611139,0.000042528492,0.000019605675,0.0000032486043,0.00018882104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938476,0.00009058815,0.00018524467,0.00008359689,0.0001117927,0.00014400696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994599,0.0001080809,0.000102334896,0.00008862958,0.00018557014,0.000055436958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007430144,0.00005066857,0.00017278017,0.000025446761,0.0002593981,0.000019888632,0.000053929496,0.00003672622,0.0005483557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018349726,0.000045021163,0.00007377845,0.00018558968,0.00017080481,0.0003189773,0.000012571891,0.000029641316,0.000020270121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000775252,0.00013736244,0.008220251,0.0021596625,0.00007258858,1.1948532e-7,0.0053723576,3.1919708e-7,0.00012359256,0.65040064,0.004747509,0.32875785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000814216,0.000058188947,0.0029060468,0.00017997436,0.00066552474,0.0000036979366,0.024175767,0.000009643136,0.000010243508,0.00016689004,0.9716369,0.00010570798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024392619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002669628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9668894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030703304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003079249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179536926","doi":"","title":"Hate speech, fighting words, and beyond - why American law is unique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presidential system; Declaration of independence; Faith; Supreme court; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02436251169976915,"score_gpt":0.3023062074226997,"score_spread":0.27794369572293054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179536926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019377258,0.24977955,0.00045268572,0.019507064,0.00077264063,0.0011586339,0.000033115484,0.0002143512,0.72614425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45555198,0.3975038,0.0041060145,0.13111626,0.0025354775,0.00009360262,0.00003287185,0.00008955951,0.008970437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998265,0.0003145454,0.00030382533,0.00025028022,0.00030454303,0.0005618035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998997,0.00015043192,0.0001900515,0.00029374915,0.000054906686,0.0003138797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011330709,0.0001718866,0.00044069721,0.000015665646,0.0006221136,0.00008943985,0.0002589489,0.00006613294,0.00066863064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055398796,0.00013265267,0.00011386032,0.0003256151,0.0066510625,0.0005557406,0.00006682371,0.00014547518,0.00016398175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.275319e-7,0.000023363264,0.00031331505,0.00019079224,0.0000178668,0.000002724761,0.0017256459,3.7960497e-9,0.0000055404453,0.9665113,0.009154034,0.022054572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006877094,0.000017831224,0.000012872332,0.00053601264,0.00007209104,0.0000047074154,0.00014561691,3.798216e-7,0.00006849901,0.0073917704,0.99146533,0.00021613532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008127751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051979693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004375592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031782205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211787499","doi":"","title":"That Twinkle in His Eyes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; German; Charge (physics); History; Sociology; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04044680060295456,"score_gpt":0.3421243314795234,"score_spread":0.30167753087656884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211787499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050427172,0.0352793,0.000010549629,0.013028667,0.0004592557,0.0005495894,0.0000041729018,0.000069474314,0.9001718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979587,0.0096586235,0.0001355535,0.0055576093,0.00018331847,0.000023728755,0.000004968343,0.000006875314,0.004842317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.00006592055,0.0001503314,0.00012793102,0.00025736776,0.00017244846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972844,0.00003474647,0.000046609362,0.00010491894,0.000036858037,0.000048418904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038438517,0.00006424446,0.00015182696,0.000017458322,0.0001743026,0.000030288427,0.00021931459,0.00003488668,0.0012358137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026179501,0.000051494684,0.000074905496,0.00005795986,0.00012863852,0.00018742801,0.000017200993,0.000071230555,0.0006224122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1847315e-7,0.000020341957,0.00005704816,0.0000639953,0.0000032288065,0.0000075955886,0.00026888997,3.3097984e-7,7.3184447e-7,0.9988952,0.00040689996,0.0002752875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008343452,0.0000056402755,0.0002615307,0.0009832035,0.000006590443,6.5024733e-7,0.0000033910653,4.501301e-8,0.000026182852,0.19046348,0.80809903,0.00006683857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108671505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03747119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9291598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012373764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006524989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W220087873","doi":"","title":"Playing the Odds or Playing God? Limiting Parental Ability to Create Disabled Children through Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Odds; Bioethics; Possession (linguistics); Disease; Law; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.05479040214242673,"score_gpt":0.3575982214030923,"score_spread":0.3028078192606655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W220087873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93103945,0.045110535,0.00006862718,0.016087675,0.000097437434,0.0039158543,0.000017083616,0.00026492955,0.003398428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9302952,0.059712462,0.002123693,0.007236481,0.00017249856,0.00038981845,0.00003581354,0.00001883493,0.000015155074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979902,0.00012838624,0.00060533657,0.00056847115,0.00026229513,0.00044531946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858254,0.00028397856,0.00018405839,0.00075988163,0.000075612596,0.000113899456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046700117,0.00024391664,0.0005653138,0.000023861023,0.0005089971,0.000033042965,0.00020633343,0.00007779754,0.000088606655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011958363,0.00014141866,0.0001269199,0.0003966196,0.00009780752,0.00014805337,0.00006661439,0.00027340936,0.00006504339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004102787,0.00054835883,0.5964602,0.0069083762,0.00018485622,0.000059861894,0.0005589397,0.000016211166,0.00084952416,0.014034028,0.0040059723,0.37596336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000706395,0.0007783743,0.97685564,0.0071959356,0.0005044205,0.0004796968,0.00004638024,0.000012638273,0.001867043,0.0007268451,0.010496396,0.0003302218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003170478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043127642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3803954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010310615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058265523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5766886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W271711168","doi":"","title":"S.O.S. from the FDA: A Cry for Help in the World of Unregulated Dietary Supplements","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Muscle metabolism and nutrition","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Public health; Business; SAFER; Legislature; Medicine; Public relations; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.018635614036010946,"score_gpt":0.29798325961100464,"score_spread":0.2793476455749937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W271711168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7291949,0.2561548,0.000052118965,0.009597353,0.00058100757,0.002822524,0.0006326396,0.000008628236,0.0009560343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601533,0.031507302,0.000612855,0.0056208074,0.0004917923,0.00023884095,0.0012637255,0.000017257305,0.000094126386],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992543,0.0001059541,0.00025347294,0.00016998519,0.000087366745,0.00012895405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993309,0.00006018498,0.00008510018,0.00046595628,0.00003929468,0.00001857129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046253228,0.00009399742,0.00017578703,0.000007968207,0.00004374147,0.000007764309,0.00029202807,0.00004639877,0.00008530732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055439952,0.000052672385,0.00012318692,0.00010365728,0.00006741281,0.0000031933098,0.00004403173,0.000084215106,0.0000026721707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001636203,0.00045862925,0.0015677884,0.0019778754,0.00018249647,0.0000023377008,0.00011025935,5.148319e-7,0.67792404,0.014674176,0.25396565,0.04897258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036292127,0.000031349828,0.004985007,0.00035561953,0.00007843491,0.0000011804938,0.000007267966,0.0000017845671,0.016899258,0.0006841206,0.9765163,0.00007674102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028298947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024025799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72255063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000012225983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000138408395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21479174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285559923","doi":"","title":"Foreign Law and Opinion in State Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Majority opinion; Political science; Precedent; Common law; International law; Concurring opinion; Court of record; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.020602059299586147,"score_gpt":0.32072313527617546,"score_spread":0.3001210759765893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285559923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041281935,0.032200117,0.000031646843,0.004052405,0.00021948421,0.00043242853,0.0000090078975,0.00002751908,0.9588992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94719255,0.047909778,0.000114455615,0.003388866,0.00022157423,0.000023469538,0.000030762392,0.0000066674115,0.0011119058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937296,0.000083065475,0.00016371562,0.00009866819,0.00016550046,0.000116088195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997859,0.000044968994,0.000055127857,0.000049002323,0.000041391155,0.00002360486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046450674,0.000047383546,0.00010180784,0.000009115278,0.000115162344,0.00003014955,0.00006062237,0.000022287159,0.0000688673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016889484,0.000042678388,0.000024995736,0.000056884306,0.0000826802,0.00017916119,0.00001091001,0.0000383951,0.00003204601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4362774e-7,0.000009887304,0.00025588844,0.00008897003,0.0000011363256,7.3818063e-7,0.00002930698,6.2041516e-7,0.0000019355753,0.99750507,0.0011488778,0.00095692644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007093904,0.000005977568,0.0008424682,0.0006457591,0.0000030174683,5.90071e-7,0.0000037506368,0.0000036486908,0.000009686341,0.10883006,0.88952947,0.00005466866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038165823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026718954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037291262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020064592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W299939199","doi":"","title":"La Migra in the Mirror: Immigration Enforcement, Racial Profiling, and the Psychology of One Mexican Chasing after Another","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Immigration; Law enforcement; Law; Criminology; Population; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Enforcement; Profiling (computer programming); Immigration law; Gender studies; Race (biology); Demography","score_opus":0.02874774233683494,"score_gpt":0.34512731950447856,"score_spread":0.31637957716764364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W299939199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10863739,0.3686094,0.0017301218,0.104430944,0.0004576306,0.0075994013,0.000018220428,0.00008283491,0.40843406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556992,0.035152715,0.00011111224,0.0087999115,0.00006924133,0.000045587632,0.000002283554,0.0000039645183,0.0001159776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985151,0.00070517417,0.00028212616,0.00013788171,0.00019633592,0.00016334381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952096,0.000111115434,0.00013139512,0.00018999606,0.000027214235,0.000019345207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020179464,0.000080170896,0.00023667952,0.00001519221,0.0001475145,0.000026932086,0.00019457568,0.00006159448,0.000103189035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041588075,0.000041501942,0.0000761586,0.00017310899,0.0033525815,0.000101910795,0.000008214121,0.00009809112,0.0000057172565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026727375,0.000045572062,0.00019653112,0.000058750637,0.000007767408,0.0000010245196,0.00705579,9.591724e-9,0.00003288907,0.98268926,0.00013403973,0.009751646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008510675,0.00007186128,0.0016458405,0.00072933483,0.00010435829,0.0000032169767,0.0003416283,0.0000030345414,0.000050204973,0.02781673,0.9682403,0.00014238147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016894592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008208119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010633765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023013705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312237236","doi":"","title":"Regionalism Revisited: The Effort to Streamline Governance in Buffalo and Erie County, New York","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Population; Workforce; State (computer science); Economy; Geography; Economic history; Agricultural economics; Political science; History; Law; Economics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03421935307919307,"score_gpt":0.28963428321019785,"score_spread":0.2554149301310048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312237236","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021127915,0.77752143,0.00023317224,0.105166614,0.00043473797,0.003238723,0.00007478365,0.00010479627,0.09209782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22603367,0.73869056,0.00016823506,0.03128276,0.0003347335,0.00003365747,0.000017046086,0.000014385253,0.0034249674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986844,0.00007811871,0.00028007795,0.00022265174,0.00049409,0.00024064661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994399,0.00007125355,0.000117565694,0.00022263652,0.00003492734,0.00011372454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046566722,0.00010872553,0.00024112486,0.000005601796,0.00025027135,0.000028616105,0.0002171301,0.00004827588,0.00018317108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017347839,0.0000780266,0.00004853979,0.00046295935,0.00015076352,0.00017146721,0.0000401837,0.00007969241,0.00004980662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058675473,0.000020348782,0.004658488,0.00010578484,0.000004428739,0.000012702992,0.00042846537,0.0000018626855,6.168229e-7,0.7383159,0.25119075,0.005254825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012565414,0.000015031673,0.00717329,0.0013556834,0.000013925162,0.000005550203,0.000013814042,0.0000016333958,0.0000024467345,0.0009704471,0.9902174,0.00010512863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012643186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009915171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73902667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010365165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011662805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125450080","doi":"","title":"An Investigation of Top-down Vs. Bottom-up Processing in Post-Appellate Review of a Criminal Case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Criminal investigation; Criminal case; Battle; Criminal procedure; Psychology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.08130371828390283,"score_gpt":0.433450871712946,"score_spread":0.3521471534290432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125450080","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038512484,0.9946352,0.00000435138,0.00034803204,0.0002980917,0.0025997881,0.000044384018,0.000043961485,0.001987639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008075727,0.99674785,0.0010959059,0.0015463083,0.00016118489,0.00013744361,0.000072627154,0.00006512784,0.0000927974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929119,0.0017547394,0.0030172078,0.0007915838,0.0010204217,0.0005041687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409425,0.00046397626,0.003066695,0.0010036455,0.0010900195,0.0002813943],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065364055,0.00058297644,0.0040925625,0.00024278875,0.00020823549,0.00007175879,0.0011902504,0.0005230327,0.00039636705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024090088,0.00047461045,0.0006392656,0.0021863277,0.00076759816,0.0006219062,0.000121780125,0.0009416229,0.000055770604],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012808157,0.0000239491,0.0000013435791,0.41366112,0.000007612403,0.000047462432,0.00023427597,7.994291e-9,4.4272582e-7,0.0024300143,0.00019918225,0.5833933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004155082,0.000040086692,0.0000011459645,0.43608597,0.0010013869,0.0001725676,0.000022718417,1.6705087e-7,0.0000014713464,0.0001484729,0.5622226,0.00026187065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015663893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023113694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58313143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011448001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002962013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W317315170","doi":"","title":"Distributed Generation: A Step Forward in United States Energy Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy policy; Government (linguistics); Renewable energy; Electricity; Statute; Incentive; Economics; Business; Public administration; Political science; Engineering; Law; Market economy; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.016214802363323847,"score_gpt":0.27333493502285666,"score_spread":0.2571201326595328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W317315170","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17932211,0.6598195,0.061473344,0.011123935,0.0014591945,0.0019198088,0.0008353431,0.001915541,0.082131244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8190555,0.16740595,0.00017738673,0.010345222,0.000696182,0.00004063958,0.0018536155,0.00006976906,0.0003557346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991353,0.000028813467,0.00033602573,0.00005364044,0.00009881888,0.00034741082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995916,0.000049571714,0.000028893151,0.00019926454,0.000032677828,0.00009802283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021603337,0.00015351751,0.00025098815,0.000108759734,0.00003428467,0.000022847626,0.000104470564,0.00005349412,0.000055021676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029254761,0.0001368972,0.00006129683,0.00080606004,0.000024353223,0.00009582107,0.000016579823,0.00008070835,0.00003139996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001096673,0.000091414106,0.00039201532,0.0045431065,0.00018306146,0.000038982034,0.00096670253,0.0057572634,0.0008038657,0.78346956,0.1467566,0.056986462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013805451,0.000015367295,0.00016994339,0.00056419725,0.000017028355,0.00000909554,0.0000113118085,0.0013621959,0.00090075826,0.00011090578,0.9965324,0.00016877292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029984566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002215474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84977573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009871528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016194113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55825055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W319910510","doi":"","title":"Dean Penelope Andrews: Advocacy, Leadership, Vision","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Practice of law; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.17006499534824487,"score_gpt":0.4476186952387733,"score_spread":0.2775536998905284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W319910510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005969769,0.102040626,0.00003457212,0.18917632,0.0010468307,0.00050675153,0.0000015193493,0.000090793255,0.7065056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87783784,0.052643813,0.0008874171,0.05982406,0.0010470418,0.00005714761,0.00002632033,0.000019667692,0.0076566627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861306,0.00038322154,0.00026261987,0.00012669856,0.00027907832,0.00033530264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909735,0.00022208369,0.00013999897,0.00022201923,0.00013975964,0.00017880976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00203671,0.000087764645,0.00015643142,0.000024467936,0.0005138475,0.00009994212,0.00020309666,0.000058522895,0.004444187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000841883,0.00007721081,0.0000662475,0.0005529904,0.00014318747,0.0015552159,0.000022432734,0.00021987066,0.0021598986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013234355,0.00011215622,0.000533753,0.00025757207,0.0000097381535,3.2570824e-7,0.003557875,2.1976783e-8,0.0000073971382,0.809652,0.15148042,0.03438745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046789773,0.0000079590645,0.00050239585,0.0004593324,0.000035346224,0.000002200618,0.00082606875,1.3390242e-7,0.0000110263345,0.00024359208,0.99775326,0.000111897425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030688369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010280325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061086204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033412818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W332419683","doi":"","title":"Pioneer's Big Lie","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eugenics; Nazism; Law; Sociology; German; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.06345128292212315,"score_gpt":0.3728097845349314,"score_spread":0.30935850161280826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W332419683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052619976,0.6370824,0.000028958328,0.013604418,0.00053274364,0.00057124696,0.0000032946039,0.00006294714,0.3475878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33293417,0.5997376,0.0013103032,0.056995347,0.0007742799,0.0000664439,0.000028345019,0.00005067001,0.008102877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987221,0.00012988242,0.00038153314,0.00022820114,0.00027765168,0.000260682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989214,0.00011671133,0.00006953019,0.00048363276,0.00015514283,0.00025359544],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008364888,0.00013408338,0.00043708854,0.000022160631,0.00007992557,0.000009475535,0.00007500481,0.000120607394,0.0010042669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006541594,0.00010283387,0.00014277021,0.0002736781,0.00005900282,0.00003380811,0.000016594331,0.00044867455,0.0005718751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032246323,0.00008336172,0.0005358924,0.011810489,0.00003471485,0.00006233501,0.000056156096,4.251047e-8,0.000010230581,0.93544614,0.033446785,0.018510608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020033025,0.00008536345,0.00007800965,0.0027045729,0.00013879218,0.000087720444,0.0000038093135,3.660929e-7,0.000046231577,0.0012274464,0.9953198,0.00010760035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019554501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031790023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039084734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001851244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33514326","doi":"10.1186/s12877-020-01980-3","title":"Enron - the Bankruptcy Heard around the World and the International Ricochet of Sarbanes-Oxley","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.021324418011964365,"score_gpt":0.23576222242305425,"score_spread":0.2144378044110899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33514326","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0272129,0.43911123,0.00004625636,0.13240966,0.0016962148,0.0020777602,0.0000111881545,0.00005673165,0.39737806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94550353,0.018079503,0.000014330088,0.034173634,0.00045752135,0.000053721793,0.000005710745,0.000014910682,0.0016971399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999043,0.000056435783,0.00032603377,0.00016343564,0.00027256223,0.00013854157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.000245621,0.00038156513,0.00038433177,0.000088066445,0.0000054044845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012974698,0.00013471482,0.00023503402,0.000015494204,0.00020885238,0.0001404495,0.00044720413,0.000018066661,0.00029054758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020876876,0.000058876223,0.00012327291,0.00034427017,0.00027968324,0.00031481503,0.000110617715,0.00015398739,0.00006960305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013150981,0.000021506314,0.0014529766,0.00037459834,0.000037311413,0.0000014225953,0.000014490356,0.0000017143038,0.0000055974406,0.96617645,0.028430702,0.0034701005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002781774,0.0000021738704,0.0018658577,0.00067499815,0.0000985849,0.0000058769556,0.000016685079,0.000045276058,0.000012535055,0.010672019,0.986245,0.00008286578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012428433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016146632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011097689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015589667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31812924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343959264","doi":"","title":"\"Now I See It for What It Really Is\": The Impact of Participation in an Innocence Project Practicum on Criminology Students","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Practicum; Psychology; Conviction; Criminal justice; Feeling; Imprisonment; Criminology; Coursework; Social psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.31672631796511247,"score_gpt":0.5795727542969988,"score_spread":0.26284643633188637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343959264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42119706,0.013506093,0.000047613685,0.50645375,0.001557538,0.008024328,0.000026699783,0.000057772315,0.049129147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665506,0.0180337,0.00010523312,0.0145456875,0.00013726839,0.00034064177,0.000015822177,0.000008209769,0.00026286615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981084,0.00072985963,0.00042473926,0.00014955364,0.00029063327,0.0002968266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980609,0.0008284096,0.00042399138,0.00028436436,0.00034444456,0.00005791935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031408647,0.00009625153,0.00019903615,0.00004618364,0.00022356372,0.00014463074,0.0003118425,0.000066113935,0.0002530136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022374007,0.00006517605,0.00006906334,0.0005192692,0.00012674124,0.0028485102,0.000021775495,0.00019864186,0.000059371738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010749499,0.003409384,0.032506693,0.0007410302,0.0001247912,6.284277e-7,0.098654404,0.0000043490872,0.000076048396,0.6872994,0.13898286,0.038092908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019637287,0.0002494107,0.023831498,0.00088092143,0.00010142403,0.0000013787151,0.0036467258,0.0000057416037,0.000038506092,0.00051957875,0.97038525,0.00014319764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00580476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004295218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83140236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120749384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005781744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87750995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344631665","doi":"","title":"When Justice Fails: Collateral Damage","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Blame; Commit; Trial by ordeal; Law; Tragedy (event); Homicide; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Poison control; Social psychology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.04686149720478296,"score_gpt":0.357828436744681,"score_spread":0.31096693953989807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344631665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041581366,0.23840731,0.00035853285,0.007844627,0.0023176821,0.0008429554,0.000009687387,0.00023263448,0.7084052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89175075,0.09266971,0.00055383897,0.009457992,0.0013492252,0.000058523357,0.000012002095,0.000018469605,0.0041294727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987447,0.00024696346,0.00022978873,0.00013998589,0.00026301778,0.00037552972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992704,0.00012193464,0.00008329689,0.00023854598,0.00009264629,0.0001931773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008747022,0.00010048748,0.00024361213,0.00002545443,0.00056789524,0.000088326466,0.00020698062,0.00004833916,0.002578049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014275935,0.00008851245,0.00015740642,0.00035994122,0.00012246866,0.00059827714,0.000037553065,0.00009603433,0.0010451634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095191135,0.00033943413,0.001159294,0.0041544423,0.00019250119,0.000015650132,0.022120833,0.0000019577983,0.000041262163,0.6532173,0.12040651,0.19834127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034558914,0.000008602178,0.00005616803,0.00043384812,0.0016758225,0.0000023718283,0.009256125,0.0000029550295,0.000004279979,0.00008978719,0.98830515,0.00013035623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012887791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010374894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86789864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065074884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047691687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W595083468","doi":"","title":"A Neu Neumeier: The Need for a More Flexible Framework for Choice of Law in the State of New York","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Law; Tort; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Conflict of laws; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Substantive law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12382670485044123,"score_gpt":0.41453086304578335,"score_spread":0.2907041581953421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W595083468","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018770764,0.5222033,0.012466169,0.3135616,0.0007848413,0.029976912,0.00045735986,0.00013707335,0.10164195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567192,0.013399551,0.006089063,0.020589806,0.0006523799,0.0013832799,0.000013981259,0.000030257395,0.0011224378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990198,0.00010356651,0.00032764312,0.000102815284,0.00017665657,0.00026949323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998234,0.0010830815,0.0002106422,0.0003540515,0.000059013597,0.0000592493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013054585,0.00008064569,0.00024881068,0.0000072054872,0.00022689697,0.000021384909,0.00051642396,0.000041339546,0.00002150221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000258675,0.000045745364,0.00016826988,0.00034742118,0.00022826377,0.00011427991,0.000030062005,0.00010116096,0.0000044308367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033414901,0.000041126,0.000051885498,0.00035207928,0.000008992486,7.386256e-9,0.003503367,0.000002386486,0.0000058408596,0.98836917,0.002526797,0.0051350202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009564099,0.000017613218,0.00017549396,0.00045681154,0.000057619112,1.1956895e-7,0.00018565264,0.0000056203585,0.000035134955,0.0421319,0.95678324,0.000055138236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014824453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038243656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014767872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008110738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99173594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}