{"meta":{"query_hash":"1fc2d62407f7","filters":{"venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation"},"cohort_total":29,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":29,"exported":29,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1fc2d62407f7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Alternatives+to+the+High+Cost+of+Litigation"},"results":[{"id":"W1966981078","doi":"10.1002/alt.20241","title":"California's supreme court first reasserts an arbitrator power…","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Mediation; Statute; Confidentiality; Power (physics); Subpoena; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02391639917174016,"score_gpt":0.24561896887713888,"score_spread":0.22170256970539873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966981078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96462685,0.00002260767,0.002921373,0.009902676,0.0005115194,0.000444482,0.000048327016,0.00009994023,0.021422228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971459,0.000018473911,0.000113137525,0.0017088109,0.00055301323,0.000048446054,0.0000775096,0.000018592491,0.00031614795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897516,0.000019965904,0.0002556744,0.00021013185,0.00034991,0.00018914591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991753,0.00004238528,0.00020341961,0.00027931054,0.00026759045,0.00003199102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018338372,0.00013134857,0.00013957737,0.00013117737,0.00035664107,0.00008752692,0.00028101908,0.00003438666,0.00023919996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000902039,0.00010419549,0.00006127375,0.00031684665,0.00008913863,0.0008757634,0.00006191966,0.00008680564,0.0003569217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038873992,0.0014726982,0.052203536,0.0001800103,0.00030014,0.00003164168,0.0022949688,0.0051663374,0.0070101977,0.8618498,0.06468026,0.004421685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005984372,0.000055281496,0.2243563,0.00008113498,0.000038746824,0.00000652947,0.00041929202,0.0043678842,0.0018201679,0.002379042,0.76559174,0.00028543113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000732182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036649668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042970558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024374318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45876253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976180794","doi":"10.1002/alt.20046","title":"Investment disputes' model treaty encourage more arbitration use","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Arbitration; Investment (military); Bilateral investment treaty; Business; Law; Law and economics; International trade; Political science; International investment; Economics; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.0290887936176017,"score_gpt":0.2543324904822929,"score_spread":0.2252436968646912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976180794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93322235,0.000011176297,0.029595187,0.01539463,0.00041119073,0.0009600367,0.000033605043,0.00008749995,0.020284323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671472,0.000007007809,0.001745,0.029898966,0.000485485,0.000106159285,0.00021172296,0.000019152953,0.00037933202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987037,0.000014834229,0.00036341793,0.0002465075,0.0005014405,0.00017008407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991005,0.000040444425,0.00029849692,0.00023292708,0.0003035147,0.000024101295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001914062,0.00017611665,0.00014153052,0.00017488374,0.00016465821,0.00022967115,0.0002709807,0.0000354274,0.000041954638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001167509,0.00013271239,0.00007569119,0.00025848098,0.00009543337,0.0021479358,0.000071826464,0.00009334868,0.00012277532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036498648,0.00011717392,0.00041677844,0.000015465834,0.00003303284,0.0000012347119,0.00049979374,0.051787987,0.0025784683,0.9439649,0.00043428363,0.000114368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043851705,0.0001847177,0.11439906,0.00048304853,0.00019252882,0.00000509293,0.00047785768,0.27898657,0.077037536,0.4910269,0.03176623,0.0010553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092053064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016451815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45293802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011565825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039215436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54118544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991297944","doi":"10.1002/alt.20136","title":"British Columbia dentists decide to mediate disputes, and devise a system for addressing consumer and business issues","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Variety (cybernetics); Set (abstract data type); Business; Law; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.042497421283019365,"score_gpt":0.38748049667103085,"score_spread":0.3449830753880115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991297944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98470235,0.0008712911,0.0034837362,0.008094896,0.0005154795,0.0020117178,0.00015532147,0.00003755559,0.00012765234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942307,0.000121207144,0.0031980625,0.00050139904,0.0004957264,0.0004460813,0.000061946856,0.000018663688,0.00092623924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982935,0.00036809273,0.000507563,0.00028497682,0.00028323536,0.00026260945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701375,0.0018995997,0.00027324216,0.00018072387,0.00047664598,0.00015606948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087153376,0.000099485354,0.00029394907,0.00004191854,0.00038878177,0.00012473941,0.00013050166,0.000069298556,0.00006672371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016255288,0.00010209705,0.000019226352,0.00017174636,0.00013425312,0.00024678983,0.00011077339,0.00012054819,0.000011714434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005842155,0.00036279924,0.7375838,0.009584894,0.00025973775,0.000038973263,0.017607978,0.00006309265,0.0035099096,0.016846001,0.10221341,0.11134519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011773091,0.00007903404,0.90436953,0.0034154677,0.00008341714,0.000007651332,0.002177619,0.0001424629,0.0003542647,0.0018118604,0.08619864,0.00018275104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048907004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033300128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16678572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055450815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006003049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993518342","doi":"10.1002/alt.21553","title":"Judicial Review of Commercial Arbitration Awards North of the 49<sup>th</sup> Parallel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Law; Enforcement; Convention; Political science; Legislation; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.01768676966599586,"score_gpt":0.24645815907123475,"score_spread":0.2287713894052389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993518342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8943177,0.00018636852,0.0039519756,0.024409706,0.00082176796,0.001763492,0.00005770426,0.00003483842,0.07445647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97717595,0.000096659685,0.00015685422,0.021557694,0.0007834557,0.000039987564,0.00009986254,0.000011509883,0.000078012934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984617,0.00008399451,0.0005915935,0.00015311295,0.0005953206,0.0001142762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828684,0.00008786522,0.0007602517,0.00025853515,0.0005953736,0.000011131563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005257622,0.00013102568,0.00023867749,0.0000887041,0.00011449994,0.00003029633,0.00043941764,0.00002731578,0.00009648696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003430351,0.000086727465,0.00012453736,0.0003330696,0.0001466143,0.00049451494,0.00009789195,0.00009606903,0.00003592213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070483635,0.00013820954,0.00634489,0.00074744713,0.00007248069,9.935032e-8,0.00033473884,0.0021522057,0.00052423263,0.9834125,0.004332644,0.001870067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022902747,0.00023230098,0.6501031,0.005824812,0.00034497996,0.0000016287783,0.00014788381,0.028695947,0.01388005,0.04635715,0.25152257,0.0005993063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005967267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001892428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93705535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024393968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003105104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35366434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994701965","doi":"10.1002/alt.20233","title":"So you still want judicial review of your arbitration award?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.034021798686179695,"score_gpt":0.2717976956870651,"score_spread":0.2377758970008854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994701965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87399334,0.0010123256,0.005634593,0.040409807,0.0018388882,0.0021721951,0.00007471904,0.00010104585,0.0747631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718577,0.0006005543,0.00028169702,0.025850646,0.00094053725,0.000048071463,0.00015303021,0.000013902438,0.0002538281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857104,0.00003045729,0.000525385,0.00018089732,0.00056588463,0.00012636022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858314,0.000039852664,0.0005519035,0.00018449138,0.0006266331,0.00001396542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034607205,0.00013217339,0.00021180706,0.0001398883,0.00013519626,0.00003607372,0.00026932653,0.000026059037,0.00019604343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023225172,0.00010108809,0.00009142568,0.00029840422,0.00013853163,0.00077895145,0.00005989506,0.00008130564,0.00012778382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008601484,0.00018479275,0.001139183,0.0007428172,0.000088316876,0.0000028985594,0.0006604142,0.0002626784,0.0048780036,0.9833695,0.007331939,0.0012534105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002474164,0.0002744765,0.10497956,0.0068729343,0.0002648504,0.000014998951,0.00028018566,0.007328867,0.08212861,0.05324478,0.74123776,0.0008988464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005641584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028298316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93012476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035196463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046160883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41222525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003993170","doi":"10.1002/alt.20180","title":"With mediation leading the way, justice department readies progress report Touting big adr savings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Economic Justice; Treasure; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Resolution (logic); Advertising; Business; Law; Computer science; History; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.046274783450450635,"score_gpt":0.38648320296937216,"score_spread":0.34020841951892156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003993170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83603674,0.00006967915,0.0077951024,0.13426207,0.0014344633,0.001123976,0.000007912855,0.00006400669,0.019206041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954914,0.000021109025,0.0014361407,0.0007606827,0.0009058807,0.00008120123,0.000030266361,0.000009325494,0.0012639851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.00019351115,0.00036540147,0.00017615636,0.0006300329,0.00022156049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747,0.0010442919,0.000584517,0.00021190266,0.00062671053,0.000062556835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031158403,0.00009011548,0.00009644613,0.00008695259,0.0008812131,0.0001582766,0.00024498647,0.000032552754,0.000020234575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020701152,0.000056255936,0.000023378368,0.0006632194,0.00028718173,0.0005322754,0.000030205407,0.00017734047,0.0000147630235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016390442,0.00020347627,0.029683411,0.000051197767,0.00017172865,0.000014541176,0.30682963,0.00035208443,0.0006551595,0.5296077,0.0027508808,0.12951623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056135014,0.00025821335,0.2601115,0.0002953297,0.0002639692,0.000029440433,0.101762496,0.0000928287,0.017867062,0.005196635,0.61311597,0.0004452349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001650738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034178842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6103651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016688294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021998456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6777668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023154142","doi":"10.1002/alt.3810200703","title":"Third‐party dilemmas: Are the neutrals working for themselves?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Adidas (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Management; Diplomacy; Law; Excellence; Sociology; Toolbox; Political science; Engineering; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06323415848732189,"score_gpt":0.24327951620242208,"score_spread":0.1800453577151002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023154142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9592834,0.0003449797,0.0032303336,0.02826185,0.0010405665,0.0014011225,0.00003831575,0.0000667067,0.006332718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944997,0.00003367343,0.000094513605,0.0029792285,0.0015083253,0.00016360253,0.000012155799,0.000017434642,0.0006913803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990146,0.000021191609,0.0002842225,0.00021052528,0.00026419968,0.00020524635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865836,0.00024386279,0.00061131205,0.0003026029,0.00017443599,0.000009431844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036611946,0.00014160758,0.00015637354,0.000052454852,0.00029328442,0.0001675432,0.00047841694,0.000028850567,0.000052947158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017829127,0.00008550255,0.00009060041,0.0003266767,0.00007705232,0.00058733736,0.000088755776,0.000098263816,0.00007717946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002319243,0.00030217378,0.03553812,0.0002633717,0.00019896626,0.000004443732,0.0032795004,0.0052791433,0.0025275832,0.85681474,0.05173844,0.043821592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010999697,0.000056578738,0.15568589,0.00065611134,0.000108070206,0.000001488736,0.0008426486,0.011335831,0.006139503,0.08028597,0.7433063,0.00048164668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019324594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000127508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7765288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020460475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042005126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34866926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024387835","doi":"10.1002/alt.20129","title":"When it's over before it's completed: The finality of interim awards","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Miller Group (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Arbitration; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028892905289005493,"score_gpt":0.27341480373980687,"score_spread":0.24452189845080138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024387835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8751941,0.0000145149825,0.0038393242,0.049246293,0.0006188585,0.00069405505,0.00006278163,0.00003307966,0.07029701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816296,0.0000015152679,0.00013555425,0.016485209,0.0007955073,0.000036024623,0.0001395654,0.000011408088,0.00076559355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875784,0.000038733975,0.0004418786,0.00016288957,0.00046837688,0.00013026215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988563,0.00007562347,0.00044825557,0.00023073735,0.00038144732,0.000007642444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004019754,0.00012964236,0.000151098,0.00009728817,0.00012818542,0.00010519055,0.0004302815,0.000025232524,0.00042777084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008076313,0.00008156952,0.00008690285,0.0001798542,0.00016308589,0.0006491958,0.00012803495,0.00008639019,0.000065205444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054397733,0.000099090714,0.003456041,0.00004299989,0.00004924826,4.5616392e-7,0.0005245736,0.00040728372,0.0013152685,0.96916527,0.024396421,0.0004889673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009720821,0.00009590304,0.30562934,0.0002446326,0.00007214588,0.0000013488885,0.0005136684,0.012514751,0.009573294,0.17696288,0.4931544,0.000265542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004240843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096330966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79220235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038575457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015762424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64109147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028167577","doi":"10.1002/alt.20041","title":"Trade agreements and bilateral treaties expand use of investor‐state arbitration provisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Business; State (computer science); International trade; International economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03306682574159354,"score_gpt":0.24665055086043836,"score_spread":0.21358372511884482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028167577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918609,0.000012191492,0.0012464065,0.0041752798,0.00017943117,0.0005703465,0.000025001356,0.00002039145,0.0019100024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943425,0.00001492355,0.00070404535,0.004485386,0.0001555533,0.00003120974,0.000077917735,0.000010764169,0.00017772031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905473,0.00002010852,0.00034879084,0.0001629197,0.00030719204,0.00010626172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993622,0.000045691493,0.0003154651,0.00012262353,0.00013834136,0.000015725287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013706915,0.00012138433,0.00013156791,0.00017915445,0.000096141885,0.0001300833,0.00011911383,0.000020906924,0.000021709298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008052111,0.0000899305,0.000037846003,0.00017636623,0.00012007541,0.0016174963,0.00004672101,0.000053386033,0.000012781177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014823789,0.00022754606,0.0065472466,0.00009801748,0.00010952684,0.0000014321785,0.0033178942,0.0043360307,0.02727941,0.9561131,0.00037933158,0.0014422154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045993305,0.00046371744,0.52618253,0.00080144143,0.00015216891,0.0000043150785,0.0006637239,0.0069300737,0.22239491,0.20452176,0.032576244,0.00070980185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011248982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015984837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7515913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032515632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019573015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36672595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030708869","doi":"10.1002/alt.20113","title":"The AAA's not‐so‐happy new year","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Dispute resolution; Marketing; Operations management; Political science; Law; Economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013606645130146228,"score_gpt":0.23048608228275053,"score_spread":0.2168794371526043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030708869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59174675,0.000081107784,0.006411263,0.101966985,0.0022783333,0.0013862369,0.00002418647,0.00014279012,0.29596233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98050547,0.0000071233685,0.00021432369,0.011794003,0.0022620645,0.000027942526,0.000046831334,0.00001322264,0.0051290453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990384,0.000016519409,0.0002683844,0.00014407626,0.00039183427,0.00014081661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992674,0.000103876075,0.00023475233,0.00017695058,0.00020654083,0.000010477993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024768937,0.000103534614,0.00008245832,0.00007214566,0.00027551653,0.00031985846,0.0003462503,0.00002021348,0.00013526411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009827035,0.00006483621,0.00005470552,0.00019527126,0.000091215654,0.00056696555,0.00007039291,0.00006848339,0.00052184094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003267513,0.000020214586,0.00042557492,0.0000045002153,0.000015772228,2.7921007e-7,0.000051798954,0.00033291237,0.0010504447,0.9784916,0.018581998,0.0009922435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000403122,0.000017760083,0.042373817,0.000043828048,0.000017358541,4.0618585e-7,0.0000702046,0.0017204626,0.010149433,0.07061379,0.8744558,0.00013402858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022168946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031523453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029825194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022887294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67073834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054660371","doi":"10.1002/alt.20149","title":"The protections and limits of confidentiality in mediation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Miller Group (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Mediation; Privilege (computing); Coercion (linguistics); Settlement (finance); Law; Political science; Business; Internet privacy; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014127910206114518,"score_gpt":0.2502102383507433,"score_spread":0.2360823281446288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054660371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97939134,0.000052019113,0.0032880967,0.008101518,0.00029347412,0.00061060477,0.000008615534,0.00001642107,0.008237904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993873,0.000019144667,0.00002532008,0.000092117196,0.00023206405,0.00006698559,0.0000130801245,0.0000040678387,0.00015987859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940675,0.000025672673,0.00023131825,0.00008656055,0.00017281334,0.00007687459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994374,0.000087813445,0.00021870545,0.00010143151,0.00015024777,0.0000044128255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003117713,0.00005140591,0.00006997442,0.00009105553,0.00013838209,0.00006665685,0.00009586989,0.000017342574,0.000010224867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010533647,0.000035026405,0.000021758338,0.00028049867,0.000083874984,0.00032875437,0.000031223295,0.00004987864,0.0000074591926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004047888,0.00009935237,0.0097455755,0.000046817106,0.000020982698,1.4127417e-7,0.000189655,0.0013678756,0.005362969,0.97091544,0.00065317366,0.011557555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046018584,0.000014369131,0.90943205,0.000054364267,0.00002013292,3.5388655e-7,0.00046262282,0.0034888762,0.00480062,0.024171056,0.05701028,0.000085052656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035258504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027443077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017468825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008867925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5330054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055916284","doi":"10.1002/alt.20151","title":"How an investigator resolved the Vasa warship disaster","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); History; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03229033775175498,"score_gpt":0.22835161820967798,"score_spread":0.19606128045792298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055916284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436434,0.000047721966,0.00054655253,0.04291185,0.00039087769,0.00046775994,0.00008832636,0.000037392445,0.011866124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844941,0.0000035187916,0.00011265611,0.0017115034,0.0011654915,0.00007642126,0.0000703373,0.000014371188,0.012351598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896985,0.00022403638,0.00019722377,0.00018345281,0.00023620468,0.00018922148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991906,0.00017302216,0.00012673435,0.00030943708,0.00013541055,0.000064777756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022925832,0.00012419012,0.0001284316,0.00005038823,0.00028284977,0.0001433925,0.0003770037,0.000021308393,0.00018964712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006638296,0.00007045395,0.0000501018,0.00004590833,0.0007052451,0.00034172414,0.00011330963,0.000106409076,0.000030160301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037503167,0.000043803742,0.0007033608,0.000011067326,0.000023654042,0.0000011218862,0.02754228,0.000032423995,0.0007294293,0.9627764,0.0020418756,0.0060570613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053338637,0.00047632938,0.01885662,0.00006788525,0.000046287725,0.0000032905587,0.0066593494,0.00032684393,0.014560142,0.33179432,0.6263746,0.0003009788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019376597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045772316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6309821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000147135415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021597052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2929175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061397955","doi":"10.1002/alt.20275","title":"Supreme Court backs ‘look through’ jurisdiction, then reverses an arbitration order","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Arbitration; Law; Jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Order (exchange); Business","score_opus":0.022423653438043728,"score_gpt":0.2674739674607971,"score_spread":0.24505031402275337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061397955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.731529,0.0000382684,0.028553773,0.04000019,0.0013780501,0.0016311066,0.00003411713,0.00023079607,0.1966047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579686,0.000015329273,0.0013606348,0.038424704,0.0014017067,0.000036396366,0.0002474456,0.00001527608,0.00052989373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986279,0.000039184688,0.00039438752,0.00026813475,0.0004983684,0.0001720504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986933,0.000038123468,0.00033048374,0.0002573349,0.00066254206,0.00001821493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031737066,0.00017164578,0.00015041998,0.00013029814,0.00022745534,0.00021326085,0.00032373867,0.000044342793,0.00033858576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000950299,0.00013392541,0.00005594116,0.00034040245,0.000073167466,0.0028262108,0.000033407727,0.00010883389,0.00023298936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000784567,0.00015761584,0.00037567437,0.000011774823,0.000035068453,7.0332203e-7,0.0007656477,0.0010371237,0.004244538,0.9876991,0.004865282,0.0007290237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002098575,0.00041309197,0.09397259,0.00024020193,0.00014782234,0.000004933735,0.0010780537,0.019306611,0.035616912,0.40922704,0.43709087,0.0008032765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004608812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091377624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5784721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049835035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028470402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54613197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064105621","doi":"10.1002/alt.20178","title":"Chartered institute joint training returns; program set for Eastern Europe","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Training (meteorology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Programming language; Civil engineering; Meteorology","score_opus":0.08883062607262146,"score_gpt":0.3051729475077497,"score_spread":0.21634232143512824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064105621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096513,0.000012040318,0.028109761,0.010992324,0.0017456637,0.0024662162,0.000035682984,0.00015082568,0.04683619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98668736,0.0000018651656,0.0015152051,0.009261803,0.0015584915,0.00012172701,0.00023612716,0.000019698931,0.0005977433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988717,0.000011357076,0.00039451924,0.00020550986,0.00031035332,0.00020658279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899346,0.000039288654,0.000335102,0.00014779762,0.00046463104,0.000019716832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006056667,0.00013479246,0.00013837386,0.00016672151,0.00014110387,0.00016538642,0.00024310606,0.000025885107,0.000038956972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016353893,0.000104064544,0.00006583658,0.00024573013,0.00007925409,0.0010018076,0.00005649782,0.000072148265,0.00009240884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014635095,0.00010491693,0.00042840323,0.00007113296,0.000072592535,0.0000021815258,0.0015163765,0.00017451814,0.0042806244,0.97351694,0.0011892196,0.018496746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018269988,0.00021564399,0.034545507,0.00028870243,0.00005844687,0.000003040475,0.00063823,0.016661836,0.017055392,0.017643617,0.91064763,0.00041498162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010226387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117311014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028101964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016931388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42436287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070031749","doi":"10.1002/alt.20291","title":"Aiding ADR: New CPR member options for individual and organizational participation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"Temple University","keywords":"Task (project management); Task force; Diversity (politics); Event (particle physics); Business; Management; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03559259884982304,"score_gpt":0.33715774004760696,"score_spread":0.30156514119778394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070031749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552774,0.00007455839,0.02953401,0.013620478,0.00033952147,0.00084105466,0.000043160886,0.00002372927,0.00024608517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941792,0.000027781096,0.004220683,0.0005153293,0.00057934405,0.00003069,0.00025122188,0.0000087110675,0.00018702101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928546,0.00003515355,0.00020221484,0.00013721926,0.00023778756,0.00010216343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934876,0.0001468887,0.000102900245,0.00009619253,0.00021799252,0.00008728023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019946089,0.00007562601,0.000121361714,0.00008208727,0.000116496856,0.000026862333,0.000044662003,0.000031674706,0.000020166202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003021013,0.000058081318,0.00003765212,0.00018770654,0.000034761215,0.00015419259,0.0000145964395,0.000046385932,0.0000056312424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013439151,0.0005807543,0.10027583,0.00020278443,0.0008015432,0.0000031836164,0.040610947,0.010282084,0.08918081,0.57946813,0.014806089,0.16244395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014972173,0.00026026275,0.9540549,0.00012241029,0.0001837144,0.0000025215284,0.00022138703,0.00091344456,0.025519582,0.014579762,0.002535594,0.000109201756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014482433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007775024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030373258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055707726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23684874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074832252","doi":"10.1002/alt.20293","title":"Sonia on settling: The new justice emphasizes agreement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Settlement (finance); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Settling; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.024638851854872988,"score_gpt":0.27034512790027165,"score_spread":0.24570627604539866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074832252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61043113,0.00006148049,0.010209957,0.20765628,0.0019898799,0.0016199496,0.000016208287,0.00011066164,0.16790447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319618,0.0000063538055,0.00028991245,0.06436387,0.0018007173,0.000016613154,0.000034045595,0.00000771744,0.0015189772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989275,0.000023665016,0.0002635432,0.00017412125,0.0004690703,0.00014214225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992371,0.000103247134,0.00025052243,0.00020884049,0.00018484764,0.000015443546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028359922,0.00012880188,0.00009741707,0.000093739734,0.0002183844,0.00018910549,0.0003832476,0.000019413765,0.00016743055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015345366,0.000077569115,0.00005747752,0.00021116286,0.000042068437,0.00049209764,0.000040589468,0.0000842484,0.00042222306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007037645,0.00006634841,0.000089740024,0.000009917881,0.00002293103,4.3445158e-7,0.00029714787,0.0021826103,0.00083445647,0.97998315,0.013651975,0.0027909193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020057384,0.00030835325,0.09455704,0.00029959314,0.00020611989,0.000001742541,0.000614839,0.015681515,0.023193562,0.17464139,0.6879991,0.0004909956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017083662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046959514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8053418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039012357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022746095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5426964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094844611","doi":"10.1002/alt.20298","title":"Worldly Perspectives: Egypt","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Column (typography); State (computer science); International business; Economics; Political science; Business; Management; History; Law; Computer science; Archaeology; Telecommunications; Algorithm","score_opus":0.015572462136488498,"score_gpt":0.24976106493064393,"score_spread":0.23418860279415543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094844611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62433857,0.00007596663,0.0044942973,0.06434232,0.0006936126,0.0009216073,0.000012474245,0.00012401598,0.30499715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740195,0.0000071045874,0.00032228636,0.023662286,0.0010503026,0.000020796566,0.000031723805,0.000008079412,0.0008778992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990988,0.000014723737,0.00023069848,0.0001812085,0.0003447825,0.00012980093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992553,0.00003464113,0.00020186494,0.00016008764,0.00033608943,0.000011988146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019905744,0.00011125842,0.00010549279,0.00013459474,0.000120647455,0.00013387713,0.0002839141,0.000018181112,0.00024960763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010692469,0.00008350337,0.000056983776,0.0003000698,0.00005470438,0.0009115522,0.000035546534,0.000072878705,0.00033535142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032735108,0.00007028121,0.00016868148,0.0000047509798,0.000017449303,5.7912223e-7,0.0004696284,0.00027345348,0.0016097699,0.99329793,0.0026325427,0.0014222129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016877922,0.00020299903,0.2522544,0.00023371578,0.00007112987,0.0000026559442,0.0021131795,0.0077772923,0.017653866,0.28710642,0.43026212,0.0006344238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013711992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025281563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7061915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044029814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011369945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4310376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095434252","doi":"10.1002/alt.20299","title":"Lots of conflict resolution tactics and techniques used for consensus in oil sands development efforts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Petroleum Processing and Analysis","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Conflict resolution; Work (physics); Refining (metallurgy); Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Archaeology; History; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02104105461382048,"score_gpt":0.29402328300428027,"score_spread":0.27298222839045977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095434252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996549,0.00010511448,0.0015603501,0.00087590166,0.000012085421,0.000028017164,0.00002106334,0.000018127732,0.0008303328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954639,0.000044598677,0.0038910694,0.000051321804,0.000033392495,0.000023978277,0.000030604246,0.0000053992308,0.00045575167],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992846,0.000017931974,0.00030376093,0.00013624849,0.00015524919,0.00010220008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993738,0.00013552624,0.00023510699,0.00010504792,0.000122060505,0.00002846495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000245819,0.00008347173,0.00016987584,0.00008575537,0.0000489518,0.000013840501,0.00008401612,0.0000411991,0.000003181176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119617354,0.00006858805,0.000025449734,0.00010208001,0.000053792293,0.00004580932,0.000013754104,0.00005268175,1.8441202e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026312956,0.00016437014,0.0043999422,0.00028396683,0.000093666116,0.0000015231196,0.0052410634,0.00028771168,0.7629526,0.001941433,0.00006122239,0.22430934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047355492,0.000055865454,0.0042346665,0.00034514442,0.000023386863,0.0000013552745,0.00012975027,0.0007097595,0.9888916,0.00040921982,0.0046355827,0.00009008777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004331509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002225165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22593899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047859427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038398626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27969393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098171525","doi":"10.1002/alt.20259","title":"Design and prevention","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Political science; Business; Optics","score_opus":0.04983816587215873,"score_gpt":0.36917376416373526,"score_spread":0.31933559829157654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098171525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79194367,0.00008695967,0.1699644,0.034080032,0.00015489153,0.0015592821,0.0000057299835,0.000040681887,0.0021643382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603087,0.00005278719,0.0024629377,0.0004290738,0.00008033791,0.000022354925,0.0000024135168,0.00000202089,0.0009172265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998579,0.00073465344,0.00016297428,0.0001262615,0.00024641678,0.00015065804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993519,0.00021027442,0.00006554905,0.00011421268,0.00017833416,0.000079717065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014180598,0.00005239453,0.0000852413,0.00003867632,0.00023507635,0.00003264787,0.00012497533,0.00003111695,0.000023301396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004338629,0.000042107662,0.00001939561,0.00014545245,0.0001338293,0.00019293177,0.0000113503875,0.000052686228,0.000004742612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118676384,0.00006743854,0.0007810706,0.000026062566,0.000014791094,0.0000010471333,0.10919726,0.000367544,0.000386512,0.5044121,0.0004788511,0.38414866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071520946,0.0014054769,0.17742953,0.0001325276,0.000022620885,0.0000011752827,0.02159899,0.00073962944,0.0064639533,0.73102313,0.06013038,0.00033737964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008714837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008292202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38381127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009820403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011822492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1808041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101206024","doi":"10.1002/alt.20106","title":"Looking back, and ahead: The Panama Convention after 30 years","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Panama; Convention; Treaty; Arbitration; Latin Americans; Feature (linguistics); Political science; Law; Management; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01268625034227502,"score_gpt":0.23409070287563397,"score_spread":0.22140445253335894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101206024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963029,0.000033393855,0.0006414935,0.017724097,0.00030207372,0.0004107446,0.000006447479,0.000016697442,0.017836025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836261,0.0000103589855,0.00017370132,0.01466119,0.0009368046,0.00004382515,0.000017057153,0.000009815328,0.000521123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928045,0.000018997413,0.00021091569,0.00013731848,0.00025079708,0.00010150968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994553,0.000038669677,0.00021165471,0.00015559111,0.00012968254,0.000009121734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025815947,0.000085564745,0.00007478265,0.00006573122,0.00014350582,0.00024907352,0.00020041053,0.000018942617,0.00050543103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046218487,0.000057633846,0.000036016838,0.00008015308,0.00010553784,0.00085826113,0.00009825757,0.00006461267,0.00040738753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005416164,0.000047451547,0.004628473,0.000027226693,0.000054495074,8.5837894e-7,0.00055865245,0.00021129753,0.00090470613,0.9852947,0.0014996942,0.0067183007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008940239,0.000030061536,0.55647326,0.00015788806,0.000050897488,0.0000015627874,0.00022406629,0.008916335,0.0040179356,0.019352648,0.40965298,0.00022835085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025088308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111458896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.965942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023278231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000531873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55341154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128238765","doi":"10.1002/alt.20257","title":"Maintaining ADR integrity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Adversarial system; Negotiation; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Online dispute resolution; Dispute resolution; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Conflict resolution; Business; Law","score_opus":0.025928117796892344,"score_gpt":0.26845149519655964,"score_spread":0.24252337739966728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128238765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7283222,0.000017285682,0.009157603,0.04910795,0.0007574918,0.00065239775,0.000009945341,0.00009992318,0.21187519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96365917,0.0000028118397,0.0005438373,0.034392253,0.0009891439,0.000016294975,0.00004824347,0.000006529352,0.00034171678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912715,0.000016939177,0.00027220594,0.00015002467,0.0003068896,0.00012680769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993293,0.000041394655,0.00022083578,0.0001390593,0.00025801387,0.000011371836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034099087,0.00010068531,0.00010088714,0.00013065347,0.0001135434,0.00012104942,0.00027178362,0.000022366183,0.00020099092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015630653,0.00007468746,0.00004825867,0.0002118526,0.000042791293,0.0008004746,0.00004247163,0.00011220143,0.00023151955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030162824,0.000039992152,0.00046037443,0.0000043315795,0.000012151016,6.261409e-7,0.00013709824,0.00024728078,0.0010655059,0.99446255,0.0013199948,0.002219909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013020646,0.00017207334,0.21365547,0.00026873624,0.000050489034,0.0000028364705,0.00052929285,0.015988283,0.024496859,0.45463178,0.2884115,0.0004906168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024132174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029550398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5398308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036587877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000116516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30456662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255249129","doi":"10.1002/alt.21615","title":"Cutting Arbitration Classes: Facing Court Defeats on Workplace Waivers, the NLRB Refuses To Back Down","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Amicus Therapeutics","keywords":"Arbitration; Supreme court; Quarter (Canadian coin); Class action; Law; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Political science; Business; Compulsory arbitration; Federal Arbitration Act; Law and economics; Economics; State (computer science); Computer science; History","score_opus":0.027261934402137384,"score_gpt":0.31236212886482373,"score_spread":0.28510019446268636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255249129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92004013,0.000012843536,0.004935554,0.060859855,0.0005133372,0.0008680098,0.00006321323,0.000032560965,0.012674508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325776,0.000061032748,0.00032032412,0.0026410874,0.0003448329,0.00003948607,0.000005128615,0.000009448296,0.0033209256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985166,0.0003061855,0.00021953536,0.00021395965,0.00051033346,0.00023334123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863917,0.0006569965,0.0001802646,0.00023594669,0.0002025181,0.0000850997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007121406,0.00010647565,0.00010600879,0.000061442974,0.000589163,0.000099979254,0.00036984993,0.000035705914,0.00013236342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042670997,0.00005539948,0.000042244246,0.00029989198,0.00012776702,0.0003276551,0.000055167184,0.00007637526,0.00008021244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096011056,0.000080800964,0.0031575228,0.0000049839055,0.00007955514,8.0554406e-7,0.0360237,0.0007275186,0.012150147,0.9086904,0.0054460764,0.03354251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013903303,0.000573739,0.1791645,0.0012661652,0.00007046141,5.312302e-7,0.021612218,0.00007089036,0.09259646,0.01467777,0.68798614,0.000590794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015883612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002070652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8940126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017240946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006312821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45314252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943028674","doi":"10.1002/alt.21789","title":"Time‐Bar Defenses in Enforcement Proceedings: Analyzing the <i>Rusoro</i> Decision by the Paris Court of Appeals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Arbitration; Investment (military); Law; Treaty; Convention; Enforcement; Political science; Settlement (finance); Business; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.00981795295754586,"score_gpt":0.23646250041579575,"score_spread":0.22664454745824988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943028674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561161,0.000070169954,0.00040671663,0.006664448,0.00021068091,0.0010328502,0.000013040854,0.000014806616,0.03547118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370193,0.0000305584,0.00006355348,0.005390366,0.0001784044,0.00005385953,0.000036321868,0.0000116038655,0.00053341844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871176,0.000021533819,0.00045036164,0.00017514464,0.00049720693,0.000144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884814,0.00019612572,0.0004736695,0.00016698371,0.00030673784,0.0000083235755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077792647,0.00012661844,0.0001575416,0.00010789656,0.000110946974,0.000118323296,0.0004555518,0.000024614228,0.00027547826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110227375,0.00006813663,0.000062011146,0.00031591472,0.00009682792,0.00063322735,0.00011764194,0.00009445142,0.00019503769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024180184,0.00017201074,0.016797582,0.00008367999,0.00013580704,2.5476746e-7,0.0016992089,0.0045992676,0.015844049,0.93217206,0.025789332,0.0024649706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039685774,0.00031536963,0.06808648,0.0015537784,0.00020484053,0.0000028080449,0.004209577,0.09588048,0.10776021,0.05857932,0.65856254,0.0008760334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005079749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023659179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87359273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041286792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001254566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3016294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124874323","doi":"10.1002/alt.20184","title":"The next frontier is anticipation: Thinking ahead about conflict to help clients find constructive ways to engage issues in advance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Constructive; Frontier; Conflict resolution; Dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Law; Process (computing); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0723621853721421,"score_gpt":0.4166558202737395,"score_spread":0.34429363490159737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124874323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475264,0.0001458048,0.019206017,0.11597792,0.0018080339,0.0015027657,0.000039256192,0.000028502238,0.01376531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878081,0.00009804027,0.005219358,0.0049609244,0.00036791476,0.000078238954,0.0000097821985,0.000010291413,0.0014473482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998099,0.000277941,0.00045329944,0.00024626992,0.0006147071,0.00030872476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974846,0.001242707,0.000274792,0.00025529406,0.00062565604,0.00011691663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00264253,0.00011640271,0.00014640369,0.00017008258,0.0009247478,0.00027132244,0.000455832,0.000049094,0.00009806149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025339148,0.00009086228,0.00003183809,0.0009992619,0.0002000172,0.0009190273,0.0000613205,0.00027028547,0.00010103594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012823041,0.00007675913,0.007930702,0.000005558149,0.00003309351,8.337235e-7,0.45044598,0.00026002046,0.000687419,0.49579602,0.0031282865,0.04150708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030975285,0.00009123455,0.16117437,0.00014082438,0.000010986322,4.340936e-7,0.041106954,0.000037887155,0.009323481,0.010519127,0.7770935,0.00019143375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004917783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033918924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77396524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018957816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017008558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.743425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157286340","doi":"10.1002/alt.21891","title":"‘I Sometimes Catch Myself Looking Angry or Tired …’: The Impact of Mediating by Zoom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Zoom; Psychology; Social psychology; The Internet; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01877361661552804,"score_gpt":0.28889672967920654,"score_spread":0.2701231130636785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157286340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98295695,0.00018502044,0.0019118902,0.0052397307,0.00037621774,0.00036185238,0.000056525274,0.000038981278,0.008872864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809796,0.000038043596,0.00009416753,0.00042577917,0.00043003392,0.000029952791,0.00009624121,0.000014853621,0.00077296986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900526,0.000046646408,0.00030029766,0.00016271208,0.00031850755,0.00016658983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882126,0.00022189652,0.00037982326,0.0002392514,0.00032308474,0.000014706386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029457398,0.00011762271,0.00016709173,0.0000860312,0.00019091256,0.00012095105,0.00026022384,0.000028315613,0.0002476367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034645444,0.00006807936,0.000108825574,0.0006014641,0.00007445817,0.0004975448,0.00012242426,0.00008931998,0.000034012483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076185487,0.002313126,0.04508481,0.0008694392,0.003192761,0.00002506063,0.024813548,0.023430042,0.26792595,0.27200553,0.1449804,0.2145975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005318342,0.0003388967,0.5159911,0.0012951612,0.00079005933,0.00001732441,0.031464037,0.080399334,0.13977624,0.014309674,0.20861354,0.0016862745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010062901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006875325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4709063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048423113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005525507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27761957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235935550","doi":"10.1002/alt.20329","title":"Table of Contents","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Appropriation; Confidentiality; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05171031617373013,"score_gpt":0.2476469299778394,"score_spread":0.1959366138041093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235935550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.810446,0.000032004693,0.006920529,0.0016837005,0.0006753206,0.0004674861,0.000023552264,0.00003877677,0.17971262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857,0.000006732723,0.00014669316,0.00045167765,0.00015104018,0.00002194319,0.000013015129,0.0000066538914,0.00063222693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994599,0.000008828874,0.0001860221,0.00008932546,0.00016562016,0.00009029984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993857,0.000018806642,0.00021904506,0.00014091076,0.00022761786,0.000007919182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011502759,0.00005926596,0.00009365313,0.000089749614,0.000056591583,0.00001976757,0.00018174443,0.000014789312,0.00026221166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006089037,0.000044629967,0.000035009463,0.00023867766,0.00005307899,0.0004526024,0.00005883362,0.00003390953,0.00010214277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006773349,0.00019741259,0.008477775,0.00005504188,0.00007061405,4.462152e-7,0.00047258663,0.00010781121,0.005302214,0.97575015,0.0031626166,0.0063355914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011910268,0.00006906588,0.5604962,0.000220383,0.00010052695,7.464841e-7,0.0013388322,0.0021764687,0.047129083,0.018609444,0.36839482,0.00027340796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013239323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000636945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008530165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057509105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28710338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249266245","doi":"10.1002/alt.3810180501","title":"Masthead","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013544551609270289,"score_gpt":0.25012010061576323,"score_spread":0.23657554900649294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249266245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12977657,0.00016118909,0.0037605166,0.022188742,0.0018933646,0.002895392,0.00043672006,0.000039324892,0.8388482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4240484,0.0006898961,0.0009618926,0.0088118445,0.00027945964,0.00029563613,0.00041689142,0.00005426259,0.56444174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985251,0.00011906637,0.00032101458,0.0003376305,0.00050788996,0.00018929025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992111,0.00006301375,0.00022796523,0.00041895875,0.0000061447677,0.00007283113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001813813,0.00020563425,0.00019381758,0.000052829706,0.00009969799,0.000029745843,0.00051709666,0.00006243597,0.04399691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001333274,0.00016000343,0.00006932866,0.00017517402,0.00018273307,0.00014372348,0.00024252236,0.00014298891,0.035291698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006270815,0.000116651405,0.00019633202,0.00003262152,0.00007281938,0.0000015848843,0.0012869079,0.022101967,0.0012765997,0.0008482373,0.9435058,0.030497734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014723066,0.00007698698,0.012142767,0.00008181696,0.000018540964,6.4606746e-7,0.00004510519,0.00006953776,0.003065799,0.00025008596,0.9839209,0.00018058607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092333707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011236132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29427183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020590918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000072324037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96545947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250191163","doi":"10.1002/alt.21750","title":"CPR News","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"Restraint-Related Deaths","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.022440403219564413,"score_gpt":0.31967368804766627,"score_spread":0.29723328482810185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250191163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96721506,0.000040472503,0.005518475,0.0113371005,0.00040858152,0.0006466097,0.000014138761,0.000040887324,0.014778676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947708,0.000023626928,0.0015128674,0.0012020076,0.0006626832,0.000024956278,0.00003104405,0.000016221456,0.0017557595],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990507,0.000059916085,0.00024882238,0.00017878946,0.00031076587,0.00015105073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990857,0.00009476402,0.00012334035,0.0003516851,0.00024828827,0.00009622499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017365297,0.00009721557,0.00015599771,0.000088201414,0.000057331126,0.000014679934,0.00015209804,0.000042053405,0.00017995748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027074924,0.00006637928,0.0000494019,0.00021145352,0.00017155068,0.000104383456,0.000040303123,0.00011007093,0.0003904453],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021893173,0.0007838823,0.03944712,0.0001878106,0.0012549519,0.000075913376,0.04174721,0.00044616713,0.38574275,0.1829229,0.024893513,0.32030845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030628692,0.0023981836,0.48684955,0.0006408499,0.00016923134,0.00005945709,0.0007145791,0.0010205691,0.39082724,0.011565463,0.10238222,0.00030980012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022936918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023328332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44740242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005154895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043830474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50185144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307126418","doi":"10.1002/alt.21970","title":"On the National Academy of Arbitrators' 75th Anniversary, A Former President Looks at ADR History for a Future Path","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Diversity (politics); Political science; Position (finance); Arbitration; Law; Management; Public administration; Sociology; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03357383252798723,"score_gpt":0.25202344241304875,"score_spread":0.2184496098850615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307126418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8961204,0.00012025445,0.0007919515,0.046166413,0.0012080361,0.0026863397,0.0003000733,0.00004783458,0.05255869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631612,0.0000037614298,0.00007428531,0.034348205,0.00077607465,0.00034563636,0.00008120577,0.000014521184,0.0011951525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985985,0.00004136988,0.0002938472,0.00019134405,0.0007516322,0.00012327003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902767,0.00017410003,0.00047047724,0.00007572336,0.00024100475,0.000011026706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047737057,0.00012128296,0.0001166302,0.00014930422,0.0002587741,0.000024415525,0.00038244543,0.000023294033,0.00063315145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008783987,0.000084891224,0.00010285486,0.00013432586,0.000077367404,0.00039752564,0.00014148177,0.00012936226,0.000017952541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023336922,0.00007955002,0.00009740899,0.000026652804,0.000059417074,1.8764085e-7,0.00075045874,0.0013250795,0.001891753,0.9460444,0.049436275,0.000055469736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014718437,0.0002081193,0.015703738,0.00007952942,0.00006641957,0.0000020876064,0.00092137785,0.012195426,0.011575587,0.08744271,0.87003326,0.00029990278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007543835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006754963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8586017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032355834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036818106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69325644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}