{"meta":{"query_hash":"936de37dc30d","filters":{"venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics"},"cohort_total":135,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":135,"exported":135,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/936de37dc30d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+Journal+of+Agricultural+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1497178049","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01192_4.x","title":"The Cost of Fisheries Management","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Fishery; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.00938584553425116,"score_gpt":0.19353633927033123,"score_spread":0.18415049373608008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497178049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4063813,0.006875911,0.017272837,0.041617204,0.0007959646,0.00012543933,0.0016461107,0.0001568551,0.52512836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97079426,0.0013143182,0.001139002,0.0008202594,0.00029045783,0.000023202114,0.00013925199,0.000018981258,0.025460362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988776,0.0003866501,0.000051431627,0.0000925126,0.00035238144,0.00023940261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627304,0.001994095,0.00057344144,0.00025073875,0.00052783435,0.0003809261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013706889,0.0003567473,0.000502161,0.0010000342,0.00071442215,0.0030342485,0.0005719673,0.0025414652,0.016160626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009971328,0.00042398335,0.00039377259,0.0010881309,0.0012336504,0.002480583,0.0007631115,0.0016703646,0.00094939256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008576127,0.00052357133,0.046980616,0.0003210406,0.00052270497,0.0009365362,0.00035306773,0.08343689,0.0034262803,0.5999388,0.042846333,0.21985666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024721975,0.00048054737,0.18331043,0.00035359716,0.0006914321,0.0024039769,0.0023263907,0.13470061,0.0020966898,0.5092497,0.16396259,0.00017687253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00839035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013881815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016160626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003504283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016651461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054062724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1531948976","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aat102","title":"An Efficient Nonmarket Institution under Imperfect Markets: Labor Sharing for Tropical Forest Clearing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Economics; Productivity; Clearing; Labour economics; Institution; Personnel economics; Labor demand; Imperfect; Secondary labor market; Factor market; Labor relations; Microeconomics; Wage; Economic growth","score_opus":0.005515736961033056,"score_gpt":0.18666497707329635,"score_spread":0.1811492401122633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531948976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886171,0.000056483812,0.007842353,0.00020867476,0.0000016742608,0.000014303289,0.00006780727,0.000011514562,0.0031801765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924755,0.000011685276,0.0005342446,0.0000042684364,0.0000023406194,0.0000024604242,0.000009948253,0.0000014122049,0.00018620177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992514,0.00027940018,0.000044651788,0.00015428869,0.00008772714,0.00018250196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897194,0.003268155,0.00448931,0.0015136452,0.000385479,0.00062409794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019420203,0.000171477,0.00046515098,0.0004795351,0.0008191707,0.0016703383,0.0006194371,0.00047438062,0.004305941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009242745,0.00021856172,0.00034425157,0.00050937664,0.0025522301,0.0018492127,0.00092488463,0.0003774972,0.00016496883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085477333,0.00041445784,0.36340103,0.0001784958,0.00022051211,0.0012728946,0.00195744,0.23607711,0.018855903,0.3037363,0.0011108606,0.07192021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012080559,0.00025219575,0.2968454,0.000042069474,0.00008309556,0.00052721903,0.0020107382,0.34480602,0.0045457943,0.3481598,0.0025315152,0.0000753805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005298587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054378435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005298587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020480014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012862062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014859378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562403057","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00276","title":"Organizational Commitment in a Mixed Oligopoly: Agricultural Cooperatives and Investor‐Owned Firms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Principal (computer security); Order (exchange); Agriculture; Management; Library science; Oligopoly; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Business; Law; History; Computer science; Finance; Archaeology; Advertising","score_opus":0.010025781922976866,"score_gpt":0.18827120071382955,"score_spread":0.17824541879085268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562403057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814662,0.000180078,0.004616669,0.0022482355,0.000021792795,0.000051638697,0.000044758493,0.000013496219,0.01135714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978605,0.00007587485,0.0004458853,0.000055578657,0.000014364386,0.000021089283,0.000014073017,0.000002465654,0.0015100694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829286,0.00089245144,0.000055114448,0.00018977826,0.00009174365,0.00047801703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821254,0.009856035,0.0026940713,0.0007955074,0.00061630714,0.003912676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035617829,0.00037891793,0.0011501416,0.0007508297,0.0030793282,0.0061002616,0.0016732535,0.0033389549,0.010498633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009058311,0.0007843598,0.0005747815,0.0011134048,0.0036967408,0.0037877562,0.0026524728,0.0023032287,0.00042427043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004426974,0.0043369005,0.116061226,0.0002914877,0.00038698423,0.0046783504,0.01016926,0.09220027,0.0032114848,0.7133021,0.009223202,0.041711748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016354566,0.001033459,0.05144257,0.000106988206,0.0003341075,0.0007630648,0.042134203,0.3049242,0.0005247184,0.5921634,0.0047514,0.00018637678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014095068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022024216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014095068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020526492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027000485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03512144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842930622","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav018","title":"Competitive Pressure and Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Policy Reform in Western Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nutrasource; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Vetenskapsrådet; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse","keywords":"Subsidy; Exploit; Production (economics); Agricultural economics; Census; Business; Land Values; Economics; Natural resource economics; Land use; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02856848331604444,"score_gpt":0.2032149098868649,"score_spread":0.17464642657082044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842930622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821827,0.001305308,0.0001375124,0.0034852938,0.000018415245,0.00007249719,0.0014378908,0.000015578875,0.01134491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946957,0.00096671825,0.00013371096,0.00053475733,0.000010905331,0.000022515123,0.0007040289,0.0000051293314,0.002926503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967429,0.00030249121,0.00011563719,0.00025867694,0.0012210734,0.0013592581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031526,0.0013843322,0.0023878773,0.00035722813,0.0036497696,0.0019055129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017775851,0.0002992709,0.00054733787,0.0015610326,0.0047082943,0.0027137387,0.0013113506,0.0009867948,0.0033828847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007933504,0.00027501758,0.0004819533,0.0052261287,0.0024837342,0.0007106826,0.0015125688,0.0013938202,0.00021095526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007054579,0.0009425169,0.91637695,0.0002718399,0.00029682793,0.0004799191,0.006736035,0.003078673,0.0013242792,0.008612058,0.010845019,0.050330423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006153284,0.00008917645,0.98406327,0.000059534086,0.00009775194,0.000016414633,0.005098601,0.0012895942,0.00034281466,0.00026999958,0.008576715,0.000034622753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99816114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09082493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09082493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10826409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65898407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915677104","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau035","title":"Optimal Directions for Directional Distance Functions: An Exploration of Potential Reductions of Greenhouse Gases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kruger (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Reduction (mathematics); Productivity; Range (aeronautics); Compromise; Environmental science; Greenhouse; Nonparametric statistics; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Engineering; Geology; Agronomy","score_opus":0.04383394111872592,"score_gpt":0.30750735840348736,"score_spread":0.26367341728476146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915677104","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29077753,0.0009323661,0.6935187,0.0006254067,0.000025481924,0.00014963566,0.00015831256,0.000063608626,0.013748936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789031,0.0005650633,0.119023465,0.000047194237,0.00001193939,0.00019483513,0.00007860033,0.000028139044,0.0011476229],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982993,0.0012443023,0.000037722923,0.00015024596,0.00017586567,0.00009251725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914043,0.007571172,0.00041697835,0.00018233251,0.00034095385,0.00008422094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005387393,0.0006906001,0.00081503665,0.0013346126,0.00034706315,0.0017427108,0.00054270274,0.0008013987,0.0015325274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014484113,0.00044658326,0.00076675625,0.00078387343,0.00086665497,0.0013426782,0.0008827215,0.0009652849,0.00014854499],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001630236,0.00018534403,0.0024155064,0.00016674673,0.00006411259,0.000038949347,0.00007683143,0.86383253,0.0016682793,0.09966502,0.0003663647,0.031357273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043494772,0.00017911995,0.0012050179,0.00006400387,0.000029609024,0.000022077547,0.00012299525,0.9470102,0.0009729712,0.04909154,0.0012314109,0.000027556198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021701718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016635553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005387393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001275788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013317867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028491616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966689764","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00759.x","title":"On Solving the Multirotational Timber Harvesting Problem with Stochastic Prices: A Linear Complementarity Formulation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Tembec; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Linear complementarity problem; Mathematical optimization; Markov decision process; Flexibility (engineering); Bellman equation; Markov process; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Applied mathematics; Nonlinear system; Statistics","score_opus":0.009492508593634352,"score_gpt":0.21581696799281347,"score_spread":0.20632445939917912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966689764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040478874,0.00060452294,0.93244654,0.0017448317,0.00008388932,0.0001469128,0.00019480166,0.000073181014,0.0242263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.769455,0.0009355624,0.2099633,0.00050135347,0.00015227552,0.00072442566,0.00023732883,0.000119369775,0.01791139],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.00035831667,0.00002549872,0.00011189316,0.00015489043,0.00014712512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959561,0.0035289135,0.00018010112,0.000043933054,0.00019428627,0.00009669287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026860177,0.0009642467,0.0014571657,0.0008158086,0.0007819214,0.0019797487,0.0013100329,0.0023573416,0.0069421222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054286886,0.00092636194,0.000978909,0.0011708997,0.0022164867,0.0015527937,0.0019015924,0.0017689394,0.00034690616],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018082566,0.00002964829,0.00015803565,0.000047140227,0.000009826136,0.000059166796,0.000035984187,0.95173967,0.00014934487,0.0444243,0.00035165786,0.0029771826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014175609,0.000016695561,0.000066890156,0.000012950193,0.000004469517,0.0000071202735,0.00002532009,0.9817339,0.00007915521,0.01768097,0.00035110544,0.0000072122343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036846038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025201984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036846038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002725947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004565615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07326317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976167557","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01319.x","title":"Finding Missing Markets (and a Disturbing Epilogue): Evidence from an Export Crop Adoption and Marketing Intervention in Kenya","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":231,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Production (economics); Business; Kenya; Consumption (sociology); Agricultural economics; Intervention (counseling); Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.014782360059386695,"score_gpt":0.23629791948541426,"score_spread":0.22151555942602758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976167557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9328591,0.025137754,0.0011925504,0.021133814,0.0005576492,0.0024687948,0.00094666774,0.000038708156,0.01566484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820831,0.010335487,0.0015835284,0.0033885012,0.0001793501,0.0010718551,0.00016127236,0.0000134727225,0.001183515],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98443776,0.012646096,0.000759237,0.00066077325,0.0008533791,0.0006426396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89539486,0.08356757,0.014946897,0.0016511912,0.0022568998,0.0021825207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022449836,0.0005625187,0.00082517543,0.0005722601,0.0014638075,0.0011689834,0.0014985101,0.0025950256,0.015739385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095752716,0.00041497662,0.0011140169,0.00103714,0.0028426829,0.0027118977,0.0012698416,0.0025617017,0.000557487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10682882,0.035192106,0.11664275,0.059454486,0.008795317,0.0023759238,0.017814238,0.0010270056,0.0028285475,0.009189699,0.022315823,0.61753535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.076946646,0.16774724,0.45873666,0.095384404,0.03845438,0.0020295475,0.030588923,0.0032984682,0.009182685,0.015002595,0.102140024,0.00048848346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061404314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011463188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022449836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015590459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029499107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118727505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985028675","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.t01-1-00454","title":"Cost‐Effective Targeting of Land Retirement to Improve Water Quality with Endogenous Sediment Deposition Coefficients","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Renting; Watershed; Marginal value; Sediment; Productivity; Environmental science; Payment; Land use; Deposition (geology); Water quality; Hydrology (agriculture); Natural resource economics; Water resource management; Business; Economics; Computer science; Geology; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.03801526665712603,"score_gpt":0.21373851644550484,"score_spread":0.1757232497883788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985028675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6375703,0.00028176786,0.35103732,0.0010762569,0.000033575103,0.00021708853,0.0002834206,0.0003729393,0.009127308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233425,0.000037810507,0.006641339,0.000020213238,0.0000036679387,0.000020515226,0.000027283331,0.0000045261863,0.0009103525],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964,0.00015212147,0.000009788014,0.00004436429,0.000052939802,0.00010078683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992679,0.00038557712,0.00014857443,0.00005263953,0.00006583236,0.000079541926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010685658,0.00034354997,0.0005581612,0.0003686146,0.00020402759,0.0005111646,0.00073568505,0.0006036231,0.0020168638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024251852,0.0002560213,0.00029186162,0.0003914258,0.00033542063,0.0006909858,0.0007030865,0.00039520956,0.00012646904],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015028365,0.000338857,0.004539704,0.000030877152,0.00003390988,0.00007123495,0.000025982701,0.9524422,0.0020155758,0.011974839,0.0009539142,0.027422654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003723032,0.000097914235,0.0024041254,0.0000031518305,0.000022068543,0.000012966971,0.000023775148,0.9912514,0.0007453822,0.0050002737,0.00039417538,0.000007474073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064534815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008724765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064534815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001191567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014107702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012831867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987478728","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00181","title":"Non‐parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":643,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parametric statistics; Productivity; Parametric model; Econometrics; Computer science; Representation (politics); Production (economics); Operations research; Industrial engineering; Economics; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.026272288811330258,"score_gpt":0.2838772162422562,"score_spread":0.25760492743092595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987478728","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27055687,0.001057356,0.7184829,0.00087080384,0.000040697385,0.00030931502,0.0006503923,0.00021541546,0.007816093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.910531,0.00074057374,0.085628666,0.000065980246,0.000021820835,0.00015311822,0.0003142137,0.00003591593,0.0025087893],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940076,0.003029885,0.00020772444,0.00042109317,0.0018801407,0.0004535553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677393,0.02755185,0.0010197216,0.00135212,0.0021737365,0.00016336945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013187355,0.00088268414,0.0011738379,0.0016587687,0.0011425301,0.0014754005,0.0011984846,0.00071835314,0.0012889673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038935903,0.00026173127,0.0011628474,0.0031810924,0.0014319024,0.0007519266,0.0017553052,0.0019311631,0.00008815712],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022293327,0.00018607297,0.025805542,0.00030885558,0.00028040263,0.00039394034,0.00064806454,0.71980065,0.0015371281,0.1046643,0.0015240597,0.14462808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047670157,0.00010731659,0.027386475,0.000043012627,0.0000703335,0.00007666178,0.00044478604,0.914567,0.001566074,0.05000143,0.0056050173,0.00008424356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45570508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3813106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54429495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067538056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008665407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90610516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988035046","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2003.00525.x","title":"Canadian Agriculture and the Development of a Carbon Trading and Offset System","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Session (web analytics); Principal (computer security); Associate editor; Operations research; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.019568974538752,"score_gpt":0.1793866147637139,"score_spread":0.1598176402249619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988035046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26282793,0.009119338,0.0065913866,0.083706975,0.00065207324,0.00025142587,0.0034036369,0.000318004,0.6331293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94436723,0.0032242772,0.0042560133,0.0015524543,0.000073061936,0.00001997223,0.00045516907,0.00003367305,0.04601824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818206,0.00019990795,0.000043079242,0.00014072191,0.00080957863,0.0006246522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958331,0.00031882155,0.00015476687,0.00012152067,0.0029252246,0.00064663566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017634613,0.000294603,0.00027131135,0.0017666833,0.0053949226,0.004558997,0.0011040589,0.0013809281,0.008743198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066650193,0.00020764419,0.00038655414,0.0025685374,0.0018836007,0.0012155975,0.0010998264,0.0011676619,0.00034175024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002314394,0.00008667034,0.03301142,0.000175853,0.000066905784,0.00047146998,0.0011920116,0.021004256,0.0013671415,0.7729115,0.06856925,0.100912094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016445079,0.00011250702,0.13565914,0.00027367732,0.00020868616,0.00022896664,0.0028845638,0.029487664,0.0021680288,0.098489575,0.7301206,0.00020216721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99457705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99684167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124053925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.124053925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1888628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9000784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003859724","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas108","title":"Risk Perceptions And Preferences For Ethical And Safety Credence Attributes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Credence; Session (web analytics); Library science; Sociology; Operations research; Advertising; Business; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.041755788008084715,"score_gpt":0.21453161625564268,"score_spread":0.17277582824755797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003859724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935667,0.00010066118,0.00072985643,0.00026849075,0.000013687889,0.000013078775,0.00002204764,0.0000021335877,0.0052834167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992957,0.00004130736,0.00025202075,0.00004834393,0.000011665941,0.000003964147,0.000023986291,0.0000018091814,0.00032112165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795216,0.00080155005,0.00014537822,0.00014952786,0.0006951918,0.0002562336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739095,0.015013214,0.0054564145,0.0009028952,0.0018626406,0.002855266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005438045,0.00030874606,0.00021982046,0.0013680012,0.0005119711,0.0033176423,0.00030170943,0.0012528708,0.0065047964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029016841,0.00027129168,0.00061198045,0.00048852235,0.0014048202,0.0014131726,0.0009955917,0.0018671723,0.0003644149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044252253,0.003465855,0.8915747,0.00013414788,0.0005737345,0.0010451553,0.013762436,0.0056751566,0.010003094,0.022324534,0.0013988091,0.04561718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039172868,0.0017677691,0.90124553,0.00016973875,0.00030186368,0.0014114019,0.024569979,0.01785466,0.0027837604,0.0455471,0.0037512286,0.00020521885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014629017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019152327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065047964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006647608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000318281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02875948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004480418","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas030","title":"Food Expenditure and Involuntary Retirement: Resolving the Retirement‐Consumption Puzzle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Health and Retirement Study; Job loss; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Unemployment","score_opus":0.10949021223354213,"score_gpt":0.3384133838382863,"score_spread":0.22892317160474415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004480418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98466194,0.004551855,0.0011390356,0.0055920873,0.00004005025,0.000012045801,0.0009539824,0.000015387122,0.0030336226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962553,0.0010443402,0.00032488455,0.00022502293,0.000060623966,0.0000056112744,0.0006342389,0.000005121251,0.0014448755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973863,0.000070046444,0.000019888232,0.000048647955,0.000031895896,0.00009080586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970193,0.0010398028,0.001149709,0.00028618422,0.00021901111,0.0002860868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020183416,0.00029470047,0.00085377996,0.0011377578,0.00057327613,0.0012849842,0.00071725494,0.0012513787,0.004915688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073662787,0.00027450098,0.00067299005,0.0017402297,0.00062336866,0.0016840606,0.0013884282,0.0011443975,0.0004231669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013264575,0.0002801128,0.86058015,0.0003245674,0.00049281126,0.0008987968,0.0025718072,0.00922443,0.00093253655,0.025127832,0.00724252,0.09099802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005535268,0.00014619625,0.9519463,0.00017274117,0.00016711572,0.00019120192,0.0030442034,0.011447969,0.00025803095,0.024783667,0.0077486173,0.000038654493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023043586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027299238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023043586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071831007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072533404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045818865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010727346","doi":"10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00632.x","title":"Comments on Talbot Page, William Jaeger, and Richard Howarth","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Art history; Library science; Computer science; Classics; History","score_opus":0.010741185945919381,"score_gpt":0.18487456342961497,"score_spread":0.1741333774836956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010727346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002571517,0.0016084792,0.00020044744,0.939491,0.051681917,0.000034377124,0.00021585601,0.000070812064,0.006439966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028465388,0.00177239,0.00040253173,0.9049545,0.029314691,0.00008209364,0.00014509063,0.00012857639,0.060353536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994871,0.000962234,0.0005094037,0.00070718373,0.0024100135,0.00054020307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9537808,0.023621779,0.0019348016,0.0012288113,0.016972212,0.002461635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009742013,0.0013160902,0.0019700252,0.0024919845,0.007003228,0.005482412,0.0038786158,0.02547985,0.029516457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0767982,0.0010523424,0.001297819,0.0028413704,0.0026800842,0.0062107793,0.0029937155,0.027128479,0.018705564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010266269,0.0000030912186,0.000033329554,0.000014531486,0.0000017687565,0.00002679533,0.00005948246,0.000011837371,0.000021404763,0.0004746808,0.99856085,0.00078193325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017427381,0.000009631843,0.0008373631,0.00013478662,0.000013676207,0.00004544767,0.00047925438,0.00008805766,0.0001984906,0.0015057616,0.9966336,0.000036519134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048463557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06734822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048463557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00561815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005207367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098742366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016720559","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01023.x","title":"Aggregation of Price Risk over Commodities: An Economic Index Number Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Superlative; Index (typography); Economics; Aggregate (composite); Price index; Econometrics; Price risk; Industrial production index; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Financial economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.008801384251836098,"score_gpt":0.2037257454208621,"score_spread":0.194924361169026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016720559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06934614,0.0016216432,0.90028304,0.0016385912,0.00043592605,0.0000635292,0.0003384318,0.00012524176,0.02614749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83283097,0.0017875087,0.15860763,0.00014580299,0.0009998698,0.00010578975,0.00032884046,0.00007943101,0.0051141875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971078,0.0010481422,0.00021583479,0.00037539296,0.001114476,0.0001383782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925889,0.003227109,0.0015525277,0.0010702154,0.0012771427,0.00028415764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036449875,0.0007112124,0.0009519813,0.0039374395,0.00084207807,0.005284812,0.001093817,0.00074611575,0.0028035892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015686957,0.00034583217,0.0009137962,0.0041356524,0.0018558016,0.007124302,0.002348937,0.0017695423,0.00038321433],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003969045,0.000026602676,0.0038701796,0.000039391154,0.000043235126,0.00015348077,0.00013910692,0.05279254,0.0007816237,0.91360474,0.0015320359,0.026977433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086615255,0.000035656856,0.0021101865,0.000039145452,0.000018268012,0.0001203947,0.0000687921,0.25150892,0.00035543664,0.7386879,0.00701665,0.000030052353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001305583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007160164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005284812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019403648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061491807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019276798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017345395","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aap007","title":"Are Intraday Volume and Volatility U‐Shaped After Accounting for Public Information?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Futures contract; Common value auction; Business; Public information; Financial economics; Futures market; Monetary economics; Economics; Commodity; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.009867293683248722,"score_gpt":0.17837557268435006,"score_spread":0.16850827900110132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017345395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614899,0.0013351643,0.027732,0.0015265435,0.00015909594,0.000027676566,0.001239988,0.00025852898,0.006231089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983656,0.00015521818,0.0005348716,0.00008201677,0.000057296045,0.000008402186,0.00024337851,0.00003708244,0.00051617617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804735,0.00046562756,0.00018874658,0.0007196446,0.00026953287,0.00030919342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544715,0.019618588,0.016664973,0.006345708,0.002158808,0.00074041716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005794882,0.00038737824,0.0010722067,0.0010585756,0.00043092787,0.00325005,0.0011189779,0.0014118871,0.0029553543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046617605,0.0004941878,0.0008573858,0.0018977735,0.0012879597,0.003735486,0.0010205908,0.0015573752,0.0008257645],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017512125,0.00021845642,0.756919,0.00019081455,0.0013363095,0.001192358,0.0011387937,0.08978705,0.0053925607,0.051025394,0.007100034,0.08394797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045362707,0.00023575252,0.5194833,0.00009819879,0.00045686195,0.0006352571,0.0006246132,0.36642152,0.0048212702,0.10270025,0.00434183,0.00013573369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036269028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015051407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005794882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008532709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050946814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030646622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020745465","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00732.x","title":"The Crowding Effects of Basic and Applied Research: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of an Agricultural Biotech Industry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Crowding out; Productivity; Incentive; Economics; Agriculture; Variety (cybernetics); Empirical research; Econometric model; Public economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Industrial organization; Econometrics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Business; Computer science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.02404054497575738,"score_gpt":0.26991458015479874,"score_spread":0.24587403517904136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020745465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812975,0.0004674722,0.008366536,0.001051827,0.0000075419807,0.00009938933,0.000073231306,0.00002327063,0.008613374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982299,0.00016410771,0.0010326835,0.000037851183,0.000007663768,0.00002426758,0.000027292424,0.000002192229,0.00047414372],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998609,0.0007655037,0.000048099104,0.00011906299,0.00016797973,0.00029035506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960051,0.033446953,0.0036156743,0.0005776445,0.0009898127,0.0013188298],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00445723,0.0003645704,0.00071481307,0.004083182,0.0014271357,0.0029645269,0.0010072044,0.0014791166,0.0045526978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012699119,0.00038550515,0.0007919057,0.0024790908,0.0029842248,0.0022829291,0.0018529235,0.0012495845,0.00025636793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010830375,0.0025739167,0.17990439,0.0004433431,0.00025191187,0.001859596,0.003128177,0.41311657,0.0035487816,0.34796247,0.0037352694,0.042392503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035878955,0.0006335791,0.06666382,0.000115457835,0.00020429752,0.0002890704,0.0048731994,0.820483,0.0011702774,0.10189338,0.003213391,0.00010163663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013163128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00896988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99554276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004540101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020977305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032940865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021140638","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00814.x","title":"Effectiveness of Conservation Programs in Illinois and Gains from Targeting","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Session (web analytics); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015807648490450413,"score_gpt":0.20881776873182997,"score_spread":0.19301012024137956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021140638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835279,0.000523136,0.00041399253,0.0032076575,0.000020554611,0.00003559113,0.0002829529,0.00004290822,0.011945327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673355,0.00013821521,0.00016594797,0.00024243025,0.000015587651,0.000019542533,0.00014645708,0.0000037961238,0.002534498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384993,0.0028402538,0.0001463186,0.00037685156,0.0009293744,0.0018573127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98833466,0.0063007344,0.0019321264,0.0003725337,0.0015026336,0.0015572746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004725758,0.0001769728,0.00036383868,0.0012309279,0.000826779,0.0017621497,0.0011657587,0.0016897107,0.0039207856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013385732,0.00023761374,0.0004731633,0.0011542598,0.0017440602,0.0014232777,0.001054258,0.001103949,0.00023620336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034620545,0.0030714197,0.8063826,0.00016798024,0.0003500091,0.00057070376,0.0013857961,0.052093394,0.0015351498,0.02016092,0.008370222,0.10244981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003399619,0.002054668,0.9412382,0.00017394796,0.00043895014,0.00026421144,0.004521865,0.034167614,0.002249629,0.008574906,0.0059090187,0.000067087414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10262885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24980596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10262885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061011924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005936526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.204063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022777694","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00728.x","title":"Aggregation over Firms under Mean Scaling","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scaling; Aggregate (composite); Econometrics; Distribution (mathematics); Minification; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Materials science","score_opus":0.01068998713684808,"score_gpt":0.19301916567437372,"score_spread":0.18232917853752564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022777694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9060366,0.00078901084,0.07006466,0.0017303234,0.000051986543,0.00006235435,0.00042547894,0.00014103402,0.020698544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970938,0.00016719385,0.0015397507,0.000066289125,0.00007568608,0.0000147437695,0.000089619585,0.0000068097333,0.00094600796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699545,0.00077771576,0.00014602912,0.0007889959,0.0005707019,0.0007211102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827534,0.006276905,0.006087389,0.0023329929,0.001687353,0.00086191716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032943427,0.00030857362,0.0015017849,0.0013942537,0.0012025784,0.0030733002,0.00081661355,0.0010202811,0.005285203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01578345,0.0003053606,0.0010234597,0.0023817,0.0019295857,0.0038578988,0.0017669677,0.00088318804,0.00026373874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018669192,0.00012220738,0.0749656,0.00013217828,0.0002790833,0.00095490826,0.00090857834,0.1770833,0.0017464455,0.69614685,0.006509984,0.04096415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004447354,0.0001249158,0.04546436,0.00005455523,0.00009651935,0.0003245874,0.00088716875,0.34668958,0.000587237,0.60075355,0.004927348,0.000045657347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009149815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003362022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009149815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030023584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007476406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02178377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024051385","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00508","title":"The Pricing of Revenue Assurance: Comment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Revenue; Christian ministry; Citation; Paragraph; Management; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.005762780247842541,"score_gpt":0.18899292018863204,"score_spread":0.1832301399407895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024051385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022314338,0.0005721556,0.00036829757,0.9829417,0.0021143106,0.000011273494,0.00014583705,0.000022995251,0.011592031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.071810715,0.0011434123,0.0005303806,0.8945989,0.02234836,0.00007130262,0.000080895516,0.000064519525,0.009351629],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890827,0.0021983415,0.0006795745,0.0025476487,0.0040253126,0.001466516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9063516,0.070761256,0.0048712203,0.0037142425,0.012086997,0.0022146418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011931054,0.0009354295,0.0017895637,0.0013977375,0.0043790652,0.00896056,0.0064099496,0.08812639,0.018508641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10021208,0.001101779,0.002109779,0.002957931,0.012603177,0.012365613,0.004132871,0.045185886,0.00620791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018406234,0.000053038366,0.0017627932,0.00010658464,0.00006559666,0.00061683834,0.0008068274,0.0005775339,0.00033646222,0.27237764,0.7173041,0.005808594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008136061,0.00013365987,0.0064080786,0.000759865,0.00016293487,0.0012004948,0.0028566215,0.0044775098,0.0017074296,0.42442036,0.5565825,0.00047690808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035169974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025601188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08812639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007849689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062910076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069930494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027526095","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00731.x","title":"Process Innovation Activity in a Mixed Oligopoly: The Role of Cooperatives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Oligopoly; Earnings; Welfare; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Process (computing); Economics; Agriculture; Innovation process; Business; Cournot competition; Social Welfare; Market economy","score_opus":0.007205628580699666,"score_gpt":0.20621901845271226,"score_spread":0.19901338987201259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027526095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69349813,0.0003180954,0.26619622,0.0012832761,0.000053313135,0.00021780145,0.00009934487,0.00008420056,0.03824969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105585,0.00010653831,0.0057700006,0.000034917095,0.0000137604875,0.000064123036,0.0000080437085,0.0000050206127,0.0029417884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823904,0.0010569674,0.00004836937,0.00022292005,0.00017505907,0.0002576731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455464,0.003385901,0.000780676,0.00029485638,0.00035433754,0.000629486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026513555,0.000519318,0.00090326904,0.0007053942,0.0011737657,0.002896409,0.001282179,0.00143239,0.005112235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054929433,0.0005110976,0.0008253177,0.000556367,0.002711026,0.0023962655,0.0013979565,0.0008335527,0.00033726954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000352974,0.000407454,0.0049253725,0.00015600515,0.00010313208,0.0008077294,0.00054071523,0.41299367,0.00548391,0.56245905,0.00078425347,0.010985709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017250981,0.00031503124,0.0010628742,0.000030155432,0.00006328561,0.00013449628,0.00028501442,0.8431427,0.00043639843,0.15222701,0.0020996856,0.00003086869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046577067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034508512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005112235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017399332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015954063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017102122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033770220","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.t01-2-00513","title":"The Canadian Wheat Board: Marketing in the New Millenium","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Editorial board; State (computer science); Political science; History; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.007658460367444944,"score_gpt":0.1842136209073457,"score_spread":0.17655516053990075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033770220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04254962,0.05621693,0.0007909001,0.64340496,0.0050503206,0.000108357184,0.0013526467,0.00014148948,0.25038484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37792757,0.02392958,0.001514646,0.0457231,0.0017468061,0.000046007703,0.0005928001,0.00009610774,0.5484234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983425,0.00013630243,0.000026169344,0.00012168001,0.0007038099,0.00066946156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643147,0.00039639627,0.00014365505,0.000060664937,0.0013377023,0.0016300909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022430888,0.0003715836,0.00024042638,0.0016110406,0.009055705,0.007874527,0.0012600975,0.0060009444,0.027061895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004932885,0.0003268755,0.00026396062,0.0030034361,0.0030009542,0.0034872566,0.0012809345,0.0030039116,0.0013395713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008140769,0.000033907014,0.0040054377,0.00009343653,0.000008407699,0.00032591843,0.002187484,0.00031305332,0.0005220407,0.06911626,0.8658065,0.05750613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012523008,0.000009963638,0.01928574,0.0000820574,0.00000976662,0.00003692632,0.0033287867,0.00020964483,0.00014221865,0.0020758978,0.9747756,0.00003084392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9066591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093340844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096960016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6772384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036043392","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2003.00527.x","title":"Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Policy Context: Discussion","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Gray (unit); Library science; Context (archaeology); Session (web analytics); Citation; Principal (computer security); Management; Political science; Operations research; Sociology; History; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Archaeology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02515811762942198,"score_gpt":0.22341285711074116,"score_spread":0.19825473948131916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036043392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0147567475,0.06973007,0.0016314223,0.8720409,0.00318876,0.00003194933,0.000325798,0.000010909021,0.03828337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5201379,0.15809388,0.0020593195,0.26896453,0.03541252,0.00015107245,0.00032988665,0.00006130954,0.014789656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956078,0.0021881072,0.0001449554,0.0005194083,0.0006892687,0.0008504224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98223406,0.013791638,0.00078306295,0.00026250043,0.0023094674,0.00061912544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076343017,0.000885672,0.0015139724,0.0020445103,0.0038582066,0.010562448,0.0022305038,0.02047792,0.015016264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014579564,0.00024680304,0.0010774093,0.00404865,0.0061349715,0.008632369,0.0038215995,0.009480795,0.0008156282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040992995,0.00018918462,0.0038357084,0.0019057523,0.00017640388,0.0013385607,0.0017195492,0.004557195,0.0014162525,0.8484099,0.090452045,0.045589417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012949615,0.00014507059,0.010434774,0.0036202045,0.00023196623,0.00071600324,0.014523844,0.0025528164,0.002337168,0.52518356,0.44002023,0.000104815095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019374494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031108908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02047792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006937991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008255287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050338924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036208087","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00289","title":"Price Discrimination and Pricing to Market Behavior of Canadian Canola Exporters","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Canola; Exchange rate; Currency; Economics; Price discrimination; Monetary economics; Local currency; Relative price; International economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02439778695983147,"score_gpt":0.19079939738332352,"score_spread":0.16640161042349205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036208087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973315,0.00007006897,0.00008603012,0.00013293407,0.0000020850694,0.000007625448,0.00018968865,0.0000038789367,0.0021761763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907327,0.000047425634,0.000051147366,0.00001724439,0.0000018653627,0.0000012351584,0.00016880265,0.000001110341,0.00063780474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997987,0.00002820688,0.000005487053,0.000032614164,0.00005858519,0.00007632574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998442,0.00047681553,0.00046515022,0.000074201285,0.00034082046,0.00020106969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007402118,0.00023275116,0.00023407956,0.0006888338,0.000719329,0.0010499136,0.00031412902,0.00046776904,0.0025639005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004913056,0.0001037211,0.0003294145,0.0010328857,0.0003731535,0.00035587107,0.0002274197,0.00046702125,0.00016891895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037428067,0.00013154034,0.9752455,0.000022428181,0.00007880938,0.0003338328,0.0011479406,0.0057585947,0.0010633642,0.0012333487,0.0011730202,0.013437347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014977671,0.000044841167,0.9816657,0.000007990962,0.000029552682,0.00009082074,0.00089236913,0.01543834,0.00025411134,0.0003389027,0.001200689,0.000021734993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7985494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051947227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00170891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37280262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046802424","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00305","title":"On Jumps and ARCH Effects in Natural Resource Prices: An Application to Pacific Northwest Stumpage Prices","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Stumpage; Arch; Sample (material); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Economics; Monte Carlo method; Econometrics; Horizon; Environmental science; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Engineering; Agricultural economics; Ecology; Geometry; Structural engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.0035890912689568164,"score_gpt":0.19006392734600774,"score_spread":0.18647483607705093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046802424","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4716994,0.0010194635,0.5142689,0.002080451,0.000055737382,0.00005790207,0.00018156636,0.00041571536,0.010220911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977982,0.0003928463,0.019952103,0.000120378616,0.000042943364,0.000030951334,0.00004763758,0.000043187407,0.001388055],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987363,0.00072968437,0.00004006912,0.00012369436,0.00025472362,0.00011546428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289242,0.06651505,0.002098995,0.0011891588,0.000803576,0.00046896565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063989866,0.00042567131,0.0010097605,0.0010136401,0.00069144205,0.0013454459,0.0014433655,0.0016752229,0.0036435628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046156768,0.00049864734,0.00083553954,0.0011490138,0.002927485,0.0029388112,0.001807104,0.0033894887,0.00011549312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012583088,0.00006076514,0.0077359495,0.00007031303,0.000089108486,0.0004787249,0.0001988684,0.83132195,0.00059198914,0.14030895,0.0008474457,0.018170038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018906025,0.000020238205,0.0011885305,0.000013445572,0.000017986555,0.000036993864,0.00003182626,0.9481727,0.0002143941,0.05007836,0.00018582311,0.000020858044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02577578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013068737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02577578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013585673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013372214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05125153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048951190","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00751.x","title":"Forecast Encompassing as the Necessary Condition to Reject Futures Market Efficiency: Fluid Milk Futures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Inefficiency; Futures market; Economics; Transaction cost; Econometrics; Forward market; Financial economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Microeconomics","score_opus":0.008463886481640608,"score_gpt":0.21404293826462167,"score_spread":0.20557905178298105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048951190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80798984,0.0002202401,0.18272859,0.0018415927,0.0000963935,0.00010819265,0.00035549936,0.00021939087,0.0064402837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908292,0.000032326196,0.00851303,0.000119456054,0.000063253116,0.00002296822,0.0001703517,0.000019661315,0.00022957413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850197,0.0061483076,0.0018526997,0.0020623368,0.003860432,0.001056478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54552066,0.3928549,0.02663952,0.020046432,0.012034443,0.0029039986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028001836,0.0006980524,0.0018549557,0.0016072799,0.0010210848,0.0022765745,0.0014531763,0.0017442262,0.0058158725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2025176,0.00044240677,0.0013685751,0.0009799877,0.003953086,0.0060823285,0.0023266166,0.0026185228,0.0002841666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008253992,0.0011168699,0.23838574,0.00051728095,0.0016132635,0.0063400636,0.0018925538,0.2733718,0.023349157,0.3433954,0.0050591175,0.09670475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050416385,0.0012974272,0.04103006,0.00009076199,0.0002707821,0.0014120387,0.0008536621,0.7072268,0.015662825,0.22948043,0.0020198303,0.0001511929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013808524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059501023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028001836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008076475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019525208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14808959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049081644","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas094","title":"Wind versus Nuclear Options for Generating Electricity in a Carbon‐Constrained World: Strategizing in an Energy‐Rich Economy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Citation; Library science; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.009966723892738031,"score_gpt":0.20183753517434253,"score_spread":0.1918708112816045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049081644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75462246,0.0021946295,0.019410793,0.028399844,0.00016108452,0.00010437092,0.000116894356,0.00002548708,0.19496432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955063,0.0005452773,0.0013707824,0.00021313548,0.000018814531,0.000014283995,0.000008836141,0.0000035374526,0.0023189893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995339,0.00028044006,0.000011255451,0.00003740545,0.00004778913,0.00008932299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988803,0.00065520155,0.00015887475,0.00003092758,0.00007375388,0.00020096623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012071737,0.00044385626,0.00034020728,0.00046196306,0.0011187253,0.0040102783,0.00043116912,0.002214312,0.0048178416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024614576,0.00021268283,0.00033954592,0.000546234,0.0021256155,0.004405194,0.0012033043,0.0011289997,0.00020477442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010801968,0.0008535367,0.0112563325,0.00033997922,0.0002488862,0.0012488347,0.0011963691,0.13432717,0.0019946855,0.7889192,0.0055815694,0.05295315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022295724,0.0006452368,0.006024248,0.00022799434,0.00018781508,0.0001637209,0.01164233,0.12473722,0.001078967,0.8413642,0.013631586,0.000073868854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021307282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009001522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048178416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096076744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015362062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016117275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049468150","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01122.x","title":"How Reliable Are Hog Futures as Forecasts?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Cash; Futures market; Economics; Financial economics; Commodity; Forward market; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.014214013728425448,"score_gpt":0.18094240045291707,"score_spread":0.1667283867244916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049468150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83917636,0.024335533,0.03472699,0.037483647,0.002741653,0.000066318804,0.012095223,0.0007552506,0.04861911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933096,0.0018254519,0.0016783228,0.0003095624,0.00056465226,0.000008431751,0.0012608405,0.000043996195,0.0009990438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641514,0.0013507562,0.0002394343,0.00046186295,0.0013338663,0.00019878274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509314,0.024314012,0.009445033,0.0018043894,0.012475359,0.0010298254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008201392,0.000553382,0.0006262527,0.002937702,0.00037454526,0.003516471,0.0007597708,0.0014046463,0.005199944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08815111,0.0002893702,0.00029693867,0.002213914,0.00073831563,0.005499715,0.0006311926,0.0011763402,0.001688695],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011435704,0.00011993049,0.6513679,0.0003124574,0.00043826224,0.00043692268,0.0009088785,0.052750148,0.0014949191,0.016814452,0.064393155,0.20981936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016565474,0.00045405483,0.5213205,0.0015544276,0.0003989883,0.0006292989,0.0042832703,0.2614998,0.009180119,0.12852459,0.07154779,0.00044147938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0127584245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007260561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127584245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012587574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007855222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043373644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051420777","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01225.x","title":"Recent Immigration and Economic Outcomes in Rural America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; State (computer science); Library science; Session (web analytics); Immigration; Principal (computer security); Political science; Management; Economics; Law; Business","score_opus":0.012917916479691089,"score_gpt":0.24282123409898518,"score_spread":0.22990331761929408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051420777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98970735,0.0020634125,0.000034381992,0.0018533283,0.00004033717,0.000008660262,0.0008113215,0.000005588095,0.0054756966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539584,0.0022419845,0.000033709126,0.00029108522,0.000096057665,0.00001335108,0.00091074774,0.000006223715,0.0010109555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983203,0.000039886334,0.000011846236,0.000030607942,0.000025456751,0.00006010229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984333,0.000095782685,0.0007421784,0.00003267016,0.00013957181,0.0005564608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000446155,0.00018194143,0.00019729692,0.0014334128,0.0011616284,0.0012247137,0.00033600698,0.00034790023,0.0046810093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002228149,0.00013499096,0.00020875389,0.0023373577,0.0005982464,0.0007443311,0.0012637868,0.001130136,0.00044283332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007920234,0.00022133191,0.98369193,0.000069883754,0.00007210046,0.0003553271,0.0024068465,0.00013923783,0.000106622836,0.0007238434,0.0031760759,0.008957504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005286816,0.00004486629,0.993174,0.00004242988,0.000010051422,0.00015083856,0.0028044872,0.000065601474,0.000011636647,0.00020422027,0.0034806507,0.000005991821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02907567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044151347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02907567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005628169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034312234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05781287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055890570","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00130","title":"Estimating Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Quality in the Presence of Item Nonresponse Bias","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Medical Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Respondent; Willingness to pay; Payment card; Non-response bias; Sample (material); Payment; Econometrics; Missing data; Selection bias; Quality (philosophy); Estimation; Identification (biology); Valuation (finance); Economics; Statistics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08200665575115858,"score_gpt":0.25582300549851505,"score_spread":0.1738163497473565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055890570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8742322,0.0002725447,0.123114884,0.00044227956,0.000039981995,0.00020919599,0.00021049159,0.00007173892,0.0014066752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97705597,0.000115175484,0.021989603,0.00006899114,0.000030420017,0.00014594202,0.00019407498,0.000008349524,0.00039143272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.978203,0.018451754,0.00068207,0.00080360664,0.001243286,0.00061629585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8963835,0.09316158,0.005448919,0.0029155198,0.0017197287,0.00037064042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02662784,0.0005789315,0.0014021759,0.0023029528,0.00029990586,0.0018600604,0.0013162469,0.0019251187,0.002041788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09460322,0.00067178276,0.0011726108,0.0019515305,0.00072553725,0.0020475765,0.0013367516,0.0011340042,0.0002733568],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011641044,0.0011409525,0.66273993,0.00040457395,0.0018572034,0.0005929455,0.0013177271,0.11002792,0.0013420086,0.023039464,0.0012122464,0.19516094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002548042,0.001540056,0.24502166,0.00010893769,0.0006032329,0.0005394337,0.0016676448,0.6896993,0.002009359,0.056266222,0.0021588504,0.0001304225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023434253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012414526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02662784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097375707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008332871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14082313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064320019","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00172","title":"Preference Uncertainty in Non‐Market Valuation: A Fuzzy Approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Probabilistic logic; Fuzzy logic; Contingent valuation; Economics; Decision maker; Econometrics; Fuzzy number; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Fuzzy set; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Willingness to pay; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.06369823991753279,"score_gpt":0.202391472214548,"score_spread":0.13869323229701522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064320019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038506143,0.0018526679,0.9323591,0.0026227399,0.00017578393,0.000070120346,0.00011766916,0.000029255276,0.024266548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905239,0.0011242874,0.09093783,0.00022440437,0.0004366452,0.00012390246,0.00006410087,0.000019602383,0.0018302143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938724,0.0038323384,0.00023306836,0.00040218286,0.0014233683,0.00023664474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800781,0.016030658,0.001031698,0.00092071254,0.0014460025,0.0004928548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009158703,0.00064825587,0.0011181133,0.0032940079,0.0015225114,0.0051604896,0.0019286281,0.0016495662,0.0039711343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024522055,0.0005764197,0.0017359069,0.0030797264,0.004782781,0.0069179498,0.0018602898,0.0028304213,0.00025461745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030071842,0.000037904534,0.00034547428,0.000088136905,0.000063033614,0.00021001308,0.00030347137,0.04956001,0.00024166849,0.9328542,0.0005561026,0.015709877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009639469,0.00001451423,0.0002479538,0.000034578647,0.0000131061515,0.000050248822,0.000084541556,0.0841943,0.000084975945,0.9141193,0.0011301549,0.00001671365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025436915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002047512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009158703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003040096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009498743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048436403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066132435","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00889.x","title":"Pricing Weather Insurance with a Random Strike Price: The Ontario Ice‐Wine Harvest","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Product (mathematics); Weather patterns; Extreme weather; Environmental science; Wine; Business; Meteorology; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Climate change; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.004013205288083606,"score_gpt":0.1617784734757684,"score_spread":0.1577652681876848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066132435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6988467,0.00067573745,0.27981323,0.002186362,0.00009745664,0.00018239432,0.000699457,0.00030470206,0.01719396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867133,0.00010949012,0.01010149,0.000030434741,0.000023818597,0.000019851612,0.00011388451,0.000018639084,0.002869149],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995198,0.00015361972,0.000017239567,0.00008460515,0.00016303854,0.000061717714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998372,0.0010292878,0.00024365343,0.00015229451,0.00011706216,0.00008574364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233395,0.00034944192,0.00064564927,0.00036338737,0.0005305186,0.0010938029,0.0013462559,0.0008865805,0.002915603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008086946,0.00034586678,0.00044107335,0.0005228449,0.00084054325,0.0010797919,0.0005591932,0.0010367191,0.00015950366],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041084853,0.00008367377,0.024386961,0.000061684106,0.00012420242,0.0005835914,0.00032259867,0.86291355,0.003049211,0.07178431,0.0036160033,0.032663275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040069124,0.000024381548,0.0065194983,0.000005389831,0.000018455605,0.000057374153,0.00003839621,0.9846169,0.00029543866,0.0075500924,0.00080985716,0.000024245233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17436998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17541301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045396923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018212342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3467101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067064156","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00219","title":"Optimal Production Tax and Quota under Time Consistent Trade Policies","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Production (economics); Tariff; Incentive; Welfare; Consumption (sociology); General equilibrium theory; International economics; Tax policy; Consumption tax; Microeconomics; Export subsidy; Partial equilibrium; Commercial policy; Public economics; Ad valorem tax; Tax reform; Market economy","score_opus":0.02082663032946621,"score_gpt":0.20576526642158566,"score_spread":0.18493863609211944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067064156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79406863,0.0006145198,0.1602563,0.0033185743,0.00013449074,0.00023080353,0.00059757393,0.00018594979,0.04059308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991389,0.0001525793,0.005614198,0.000069998474,0.000019767751,0.000042880918,0.000062355975,0.00001602355,0.0026331905],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981316,0.0009472188,0.00008457889,0.00023667906,0.00016277033,0.00043718034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468344,0.0032673979,0.0009394199,0.0003604404,0.00045895582,0.0002902111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004130344,0.00047881916,0.0011181686,0.00070199044,0.00053560844,0.0026491145,0.0006237574,0.001670227,0.004492132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013126317,0.0005165642,0.0005551171,0.00071237306,0.001640747,0.0034373081,0.0010634881,0.0012366417,0.0004184822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071955053,0.000292474,0.0031930301,0.00014034864,0.00009478322,0.00018172598,0.00022552906,0.5100826,0.00327551,0.46365958,0.0016722626,0.016462728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027527285,0.00022504234,0.0032538688,0.00006734436,0.00006513539,0.000067410656,0.00040099677,0.53934866,0.002026484,0.45110318,0.0031187085,0.000047858106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041471217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020768947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004492132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027878708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027608606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021843612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067098066","doi":"10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00612.x","title":"The Fast Decay Process in Outdoor Recreational Activities and the Use of Alternative Count Data Models","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Count data; Recreation; Popularity; Econometrics; Process (computing); Econometric model; Variable (mathematics); Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Ecology; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.10828567011030292,"score_gpt":0.23052992237188508,"score_spread":0.12224425226158216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067098066","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11084017,0.00081488607,0.8813521,0.0017860249,0.00009829978,0.00011308455,0.00036635023,0.00019878116,0.0044303024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88203573,0.0014007658,0.10910483,0.00026833473,0.00015347321,0.0003764486,0.0006433432,0.000113422495,0.005903609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914231,0.0059029576,0.00043268793,0.00078636926,0.00093553733,0.0005194152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8960984,0.09070407,0.0049500465,0.0046235877,0.0030307805,0.00059306476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023122996,0.001199994,0.0014860131,0.0023375344,0.00074818626,0.0044093975,0.003980281,0.0029177524,0.0033663309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08305396,0.0010252725,0.0028322753,0.0031932888,0.0026299437,0.0071365964,0.003030241,0.004248329,0.0004812475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023347573,0.00018058388,0.015779475,0.00017663634,0.00019132532,0.00036268684,0.00081936194,0.43744686,0.00030680923,0.50049764,0.0017917319,0.0422133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002107602,0.000042534837,0.001128849,0.00003256964,0.000032908585,0.00009760987,0.00010943073,0.87066513,0.00008764842,0.12678756,0.0009631823,0.000031426698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008547406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060722446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023122996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023934813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013127658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12228757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067870526","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar123","title":"Multiple‐Regime Spatial Price Transmission with an Application to Maize Markets in Southern Africa","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"Michigan State University","keywords":"Economics; Transmission (telecommunications); Magnitude (astronomy); Government (linguistics); Econometrics; Monetary economics; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.020412518596588006,"score_gpt":0.17279544787614431,"score_spread":0.15238292927955632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067870526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93947196,0.000503252,0.05270291,0.0007897174,0.000022554546,0.00005270547,0.00007620607,0.000074334064,0.0063064345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615073,0.00015984934,0.002931543,0.000013577,0.000014500906,0.000010650541,0.00001432359,0.0000074194386,0.0006973674],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996792,0.00016716648,0.00001339832,0.000043162043,0.000030230516,0.000066896726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983259,0.0010705666,0.00033087746,0.000099149234,0.00009854347,0.00007496363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011858349,0.0003785475,0.00067523704,0.0007524994,0.0008710867,0.0012917749,0.00078883773,0.001022946,0.0028781963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005361488,0.0003517327,0.0012452856,0.000839246,0.0009266752,0.001718051,0.0014115376,0.0011036784,0.000112288915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002762079,0.00021248155,0.025051279,0.000098009354,0.00022111344,0.0021614777,0.0011028156,0.6952418,0.0052027637,0.24950741,0.001224794,0.019699985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058762856,0.00005441324,0.0058813086,0.00001061326,0.000031182295,0.0001698073,0.00034961005,0.95947826,0.00030045677,0.0330704,0.00056227786,0.000032971617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024386657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009745276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024386657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001340591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054936897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04848939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072546144","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00962.x","title":"Recovering the Shadow Value of Nutrients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Shadow price; Nutrient; Value (mathematics); Economics; Econometrics; Entropy (arrow of time); Environmental science; Unit (ring theory); Mathematics; Statistics; Ecology; Thermodynamics; Mathematical optimization; Physics; Biology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0103122698138029,"score_gpt":0.19014948478995572,"score_spread":0.17983721497615282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072546144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83993787,0.00067563565,0.15072033,0.0004532401,0.000055252814,0.000011811084,0.0005440316,0.00014126455,0.00746054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910046,0.0001858518,0.0077057015,0.00001990472,0.000016845523,0.0000058423693,0.0001863027,0.000027649861,0.0008473151],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997669,0.00006719097,0.0000074348054,0.00006018785,0.00005743499,0.000040958097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804723,0.0013341731,0.00013220197,0.00025513308,0.00016402996,0.00006716105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074153027,0.000290534,0.00054711517,0.00073655526,0.00029125425,0.0011616788,0.00054850226,0.0006123313,0.0030306084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077978387,0.00038665364,0.00031148738,0.00077742484,0.0009656423,0.0020646644,0.00094574655,0.0006698923,0.00033577418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006677263,0.00007322919,0.060604446,0.00025803683,0.00015374614,0.000793232,0.00059336465,0.6071829,0.01592395,0.2001767,0.003380895,0.11019175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028032173,0.000047609086,0.026532488,0.00002683042,0.000021258502,0.00015296927,0.0003457991,0.80192196,0.0050205244,0.16144182,0.0044150017,0.000045734585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049102306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030188677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049102306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009970655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007566982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010138333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081104233","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00253","title":"Female Participation and Labor Market Attachment in Rural Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Panel data; Economics; Labour economics; Rural area; Political science; Demography; Econometrics; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.007615479200808819,"score_gpt":0.19107002082088653,"score_spread":0.1834545416200777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081104233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912765,0.00019041427,0.00016434237,0.0006396804,0.0000069626003,0.00002024989,0.0013226632,0.000005195036,0.0063738846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953017,0.00014102753,0.000067633555,0.000042745458,0.000003434633,0.0000064787214,0.00043523178,0.0000022920299,0.003999421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932325,0.00008862296,0.000014097841,0.00007974489,0.00014156589,0.00035276182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982528,0.00032811955,0.0003463627,0.000058271442,0.00042558875,0.0005888727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011045719,0.00018551668,0.0002880973,0.0009402076,0.0023819923,0.0010841835,0.00061129953,0.0003531129,0.008562479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003494137,0.00015608204,0.00029336975,0.0016807208,0.0006951351,0.00022430343,0.0007603234,0.00055519224,0.00035411245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011173453,0.000068133195,0.9792169,0.00001868989,0.000027506361,0.00016721849,0.002937423,0.0013121756,0.00018301314,0.002190862,0.001982792,0.0117835365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010686404,0.00002167352,0.9905736,0.000025954581,0.0000081902845,0.000048849255,0.0032755535,0.0017097702,0.00007009294,0.00028449163,0.0039596837,0.000011556489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98432946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99016285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015670538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012438069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012091479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09024495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086312192","doi":"10.1093/ajae/82.3.782","title":"Graham, Edward M., and J. David Richardson, eds. <i>Global Competition Policy</i>. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, 1997, 616 pp., price unknown","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Citation; Competition policy; Sociology; Art history; Economics; Political science; Art; Law; Biology; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0064415354284175245,"score_gpt":0.24074006077092622,"score_spread":0.2342985253425087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086312192","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030707457,0.967415,0.00069823326,0.013328831,0.0024960164,0.00000926385,0.00042386612,0.000075657714,0.015246142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004366079,0.96318763,0.0011186716,0.0013948187,0.0019930168,0.000016069269,0.00035680702,0.00007988821,0.027487006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956197,0.00007317463,0.00004294988,0.00006292252,0.00021012854,0.00004892911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987582,0.0006607166,0.00013498022,0.000057889352,0.00025494184,0.0001333349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010620969,0.002443753,0.0019178158,0.0036328458,0.00091168255,0.003187478,0.0015554412,0.0025444455,0.029402746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024202275,0.0015581991,0.00065445644,0.006966586,0.0017869737,0.008039646,0.0010165737,0.0026951674,0.023372747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045513454,0.00001865611,0.000355801,0.00094132836,0.000016940185,0.000053114843,0.00029597775,0.0003389653,0.000113251604,0.007529794,0.85598415,0.13430639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015133522,0.000020156018,0.0025502201,0.00218614,0.000034866356,0.00037608432,0.0005076681,0.00021321252,0.00022566383,0.01813786,0.9757087,0.000024319383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028592374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06915106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029402746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026278668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003239895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09836197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087396226","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00003","title":"Rent Sharing in Multi‐Site Hog Production","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Franchising Strategies and Performance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Franchise; Alliance; Business; Industrial organization; Profit (economics); Offset (computer science); Organizational structure; Production (economics); Vertical integration; Agricultural science; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Geography; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.01104046417526868,"score_gpt":0.19536661733562505,"score_spread":0.18432615316035636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087396226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736593,0.00013266373,0.012978049,0.00047470912,0.000024761965,0.00007887608,0.0003735303,0.00005730761,0.012220914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969098,0.000031505326,0.0005873597,0.000014157426,0.000003275887,0.000017693357,0.00004394351,0.000005036541,0.002387269],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990403,0.00034728282,0.000033629243,0.00015368006,0.00007096873,0.0003541057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971935,0.0012584331,0.00046481323,0.00021857736,0.00018149203,0.0006832266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017176626,0.0005714543,0.0010983804,0.00061278295,0.0011165199,0.0025638824,0.001974024,0.002117602,0.013036236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034823087,0.0005843878,0.00084438775,0.00061584095,0.0015413616,0.0022949567,0.0014941784,0.0012355867,0.0008018375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003425306,0.00030014786,0.006492428,0.00003288825,0.000045192424,0.00036143887,0.000099653385,0.97036564,0.000699686,0.015268656,0.00074463006,0.0052470323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014203702,0.00035011285,0.0070097875,0.00001134589,0.000031683525,0.00008845813,0.00032999128,0.98045534,0.00019807552,0.01023987,0.001094071,0.00004914144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03900609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027567055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03900609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004403609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017353715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0775581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088446272","doi":"10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00659.x","title":"Panel Estimates of the Canadian Rural/Urban Women's Wage Gap","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Economics; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Estimation; Rural area; Panel data; Labour economics; Socioeconomics; Econometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.015142220584775937,"score_gpt":0.17490286609231104,"score_spread":0.1597606455075351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088446272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8567123,0.0013084926,0.004138047,0.00081582036,0.000027189397,0.00012691438,0.12236092,0.0001611506,0.014349157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89961565,0.0009816041,0.0031320157,0.0001087743,0.00001740641,0.00013444637,0.08484588,0.000036060144,0.011128237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939024,0.00010261415,0.000026934413,0.00008363829,0.00023110081,0.00016543902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976211,0.00040318118,0.0003172937,0.0001732502,0.0012140849,0.0002710796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016094109,0.00031138823,0.00041588547,0.002436814,0.0010122928,0.0008653529,0.00089579995,0.0002938829,0.008862973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004086668,0.0002602713,0.00046573265,0.0047804667,0.00020229988,0.00031520153,0.0008000203,0.00066844013,0.0009684012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025379742,0.00012929292,0.8795229,0.00014264006,0.00040960882,0.000119501965,0.0019906259,0.024294931,0.00036479268,0.010351429,0.036055565,0.04636496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023489374,0.000027805187,0.9714059,0.000041291394,0.000041566378,0.000023763721,0.001235184,0.012825736,0.00013232288,0.000826636,0.013390654,0.000025788804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9800923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.981977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019907713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006854154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007200347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04973066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092007073","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas109","title":"Personal Values and Decision Making: Evidence from Environmental Footprint Labeling in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Footprint; Ecological footprint; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Geography; Political science; Sustainable development; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.007222814918349185,"score_gpt":0.21471458926615217,"score_spread":0.20749177434780297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092007073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706342,0.001006383,0.00016948204,0.0025433525,0.000017156513,0.0000574448,0.0005190529,0.000005188247,0.025047716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993775,0.00075307296,0.00024064137,0.00047090408,0.000006644524,0.000022618553,0.00038957648,0.00000692303,0.004334622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574417,0.00096209993,0.00012211331,0.00031853354,0.0022725728,0.00058053737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9515331,0.024454068,0.005707344,0.0020109755,0.013216007,0.0030785594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005767512,0.00020181939,0.00045576144,0.001355911,0.0071970406,0.003571639,0.0016944098,0.001477661,0.006407412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033265155,0.00035660007,0.00034645683,0.0043365657,0.004262802,0.0011445066,0.001350554,0.0017943719,0.0003250408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001448467,0.001321468,0.8580915,0.0002873318,0.0002172196,0.0003567931,0.034487307,0.0014782939,0.00042573153,0.008965194,0.011383317,0.08153751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014089613,0.00009701711,0.9455848,0.0002814054,0.00014226456,0.00005188823,0.027366469,0.0010286267,0.0005091013,0.0025959287,0.022116102,0.00008551987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99615306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046178248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046178248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05536618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33504826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092083630","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2003.00546.x","title":"Short‐ versus Long‐Run Implications of Trade Liberalization for Poverty in Three Developing Countries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Agriculture; Library science; Liberalization; Principal (computer security); Political science; Management; Economics; History; Business; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04642295236663745,"score_gpt":0.22896078737571798,"score_spread":0.18253783500908052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092083630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99754286,0.00023640505,0.00008655476,0.00052504777,0.0000051176394,0.0000054365405,0.00015221289,0.0000034703023,0.0014429055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956757,0.00013095382,0.000025263766,0.000026844453,0.0000036096556,0.0000035352102,0.000062791296,7.505794e-7,0.00017868445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995715,0.00007562111,0.000016539936,0.000022127435,0.000028797042,0.00028538558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740726,0.0010049308,0.0006920107,0.00007529987,0.00032362744,0.00049691636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001483396,0.00029471875,0.00048848975,0.0008536722,0.0015665457,0.0018229896,0.0004812163,0.00089624175,0.0026543178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021865384,0.00019245087,0.00086921296,0.0013161623,0.002257701,0.0012921368,0.0019185141,0.0012294936,0.000114671515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057412977,0.0009771452,0.87512046,0.0002496038,0.00065671396,0.0036448762,0.0026986222,0.04867319,0.003753069,0.032970145,0.00292488,0.022590011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029819837,0.0007608546,0.95361775,0.00006350379,0.0005891476,0.00031877746,0.01104803,0.011246911,0.002966334,0.016265824,0.0027655882,0.000059177477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029996486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046716344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029996486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030399559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018184823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059643745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096972785","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau098","title":"Farmland Protection and Agricultural Land Values at the Urban‐Rural Fringe: British Columbia's Agricultural Land Reserve","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Zoning; Agricultural land; Agriculture; Residence; Land use; Subdivision; Agricultural economics; Geography; Land Values; Business; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.008106333324478686,"score_gpt":0.1658670496862441,"score_spread":0.15776071636176542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096972785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950912,0.00008556854,0.00009068904,0.00022670542,0.000002439172,0.000007661048,0.0009525981,0.0000065238596,0.0035364956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957487,0.00005341714,0.00007665471,0.0000188091,0.0000014645336,0.000004671755,0.0005240342,0.000003395476,0.0035690153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997446,0.00003649184,0.000008396685,0.000038756403,0.00007085153,0.000100958714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985097,0.00029285759,0.00021998752,0.00007625045,0.00049395097,0.0004072316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002822108,0.00018505275,0.00027881883,0.00061053474,0.0009012651,0.0018074826,0.00080332503,0.0003517059,0.0066984547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014977555,0.00017525024,0.0002747628,0.0014238803,0.00058622763,0.00036513148,0.0005950037,0.0006690772,0.0005515773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012288692,0.00017059532,0.9678974,0.000028531043,0.00011415955,0.00030653292,0.00040107072,0.014344129,0.0006549242,0.0008287272,0.004034271,0.011096785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007027274,0.000029631672,0.98077756,0.000023784414,0.000026291744,0.00003870209,0.0019490186,0.014621989,0.00014335291,0.0001643173,0.002205044,0.000013270998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96136284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97965336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03863716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011816361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005367734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08573413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098711823","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00030","title":"Efficient Redistribution Using Quotas and Subsidies in the Presence of Misrepresentation and Cheating","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Misrepresentation; Cheating; Redistribution (election); Economics; Redistribution of income and wealth; Public economics; Microeconomics; Market economy; Public good; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0189313270742883,"score_gpt":0.21976220901959354,"score_spread":0.20083088194530524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098711823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7385241,0.000702325,0.21424137,0.008295486,0.00012081238,0.00023867894,0.00024016995,0.00019486037,0.037442256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956251,0.00008117138,0.002913195,0.00010942749,0.000029589593,0.000026007176,0.000009444144,0.000008257591,0.0011978492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98829204,0.007408691,0.00052828895,0.00085383205,0.00097094954,0.00194627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491641,0.035029333,0.008043985,0.005118378,0.0019660767,0.0006781163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019249417,0.0005087478,0.0022907439,0.0013973741,0.0012035972,0.003930039,0.0013158339,0.0026834486,0.0055885096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050265696,0.00056800665,0.0008899703,0.0012624898,0.0052355574,0.005498863,0.0032060805,0.0026087228,0.00038116836],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007987066,0.00028606408,0.007340119,0.00021439735,0.0001909062,0.000548718,0.00054633664,0.185463,0.0025842802,0.7685261,0.0017709835,0.0317306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019085064,0.00021017411,0.003848734,0.00007287228,0.000100036414,0.00015607424,0.0005765893,0.25046813,0.0021738058,0.73918855,0.0029527098,0.00006149133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002878474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012770972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019249417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004383756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029669856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10180193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098829572","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau082","title":"On Technological Change in Crop Yields","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Yield (engineering); Econometrics; Variance (accounting); Constant (computer programming); Distribution (mathematics); Technological change; Climate change; Component (thermodynamics); Crop yield; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Environmental science; Computer science; Ecology; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.011152499399056381,"score_gpt":0.20293917387247823,"score_spread":0.19178667447342185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098829572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468342,0.00037901936,0.1432829,0.00095564703,0.000039194998,0.00006856216,0.00087408425,0.00019157093,0.007374829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993978,0.00019822619,0.0037056901,0.00003780559,0.000018581135,0.000026886033,0.0002507119,0.000017611352,0.0017663226],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985483,0.00050154043,0.00007321311,0.00051255396,0.00024813967,0.000116125164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989847,0.0070542456,0.0013992792,0.0010049423,0.0005724602,0.00012211873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036236476,0.00045015852,0.00048240257,0.00096169376,0.00031709374,0.0015483164,0.00088982726,0.000998714,0.0047617033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024080673,0.0003639988,0.001005343,0.0015273119,0.0011149734,0.0030299863,0.0011573028,0.0011731957,0.0005810991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023746275,0.00016147288,0.107422605,0.000095643605,0.00026010597,0.0001815551,0.00043271648,0.7299676,0.00465838,0.11125395,0.00076991884,0.04455854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011998336,0.00014327196,0.07819388,0.000039771603,0.00008466769,0.00009594097,0.00014307097,0.8545311,0.001946323,0.06267384,0.0020814165,0.000054696655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007599081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035663603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007599081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016452122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040970923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019163907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102212534","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00914.x","title":"Labeling Context and Reference Point Effects in Models of Food Attribute Demand","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Product (mathematics); Econometrics; Observable; Food labeling; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Food science","score_opus":0.033920729302083744,"score_gpt":0.1816647422114418,"score_spread":0.14774401290935807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102212534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6491841,0.0022641888,0.32366338,0.0054372177,0.00013674483,0.00016831326,0.0008475046,0.00042189137,0.017876647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785689,0.0009811792,0.011801045,0.00021722695,0.0001091894,0.00012885683,0.0003611526,0.00006017689,0.0077721956],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703693,0.0021073548,0.00006925147,0.00033240108,0.00018465122,0.00026932138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97344345,0.022633785,0.0016244778,0.0011043503,0.00072865933,0.00046529798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008032872,0.0010918274,0.0016591848,0.0012183993,0.00082263915,0.0025839144,0.0022853394,0.0035020388,0.008751525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027205503,0.0009831402,0.0018170696,0.0017900713,0.0026949623,0.0044919653,0.0018909303,0.004350785,0.0009138232],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089926046,0.00034616253,0.013404671,0.0001416102,0.00019731668,0.0005146393,0.00079861,0.63136923,0.0012951542,0.33277535,0.0015918618,0.016666126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013312357,0.00016147004,0.00548285,0.000032532676,0.00007870045,0.00006613428,0.0001490632,0.7655633,0.00022487337,0.22687702,0.0011569358,0.00007410694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010518689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008862793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010518689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022496413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005980714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042482376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102333306","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01016.x","title":"Strike When the Force Is with You: Optimal Stopping with Application to Resource Equilibria","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Foundation for Community Association Research","keywords":"Non-renewable resource; Economic rent; Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Microeconomics; Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Optimal stopping; Natural resource economics; Present value; Path (computing); Finance; Computer science; Financial economics; Renewable energy","score_opus":0.008007514831341487,"score_gpt":0.1875831639434542,"score_spread":0.1795756491121127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102333306","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025883853,0.0024724007,0.94805837,0.0036403108,0.0003224692,0.0001130096,0.000109986526,0.00020012479,0.019199548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7093116,0.004103309,0.25659123,0.0009890691,0.0010279441,0.00082096475,0.00023503476,0.00046494298,0.026455848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561644,0.0026126388,0.00024629687,0.00066957256,0.00046559508,0.00038943053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687835,0.025965992,0.0017151996,0.00074677984,0.0015784224,0.0012101341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010430287,0.001883974,0.0037880715,0.0021077201,0.0016604963,0.004427184,0.002915269,0.004622865,0.009029807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053385027,0.0013305538,0.0030721216,0.0023082714,0.0051368517,0.006404243,0.0036438173,0.0057356036,0.0007405046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011752169,0.000063246145,0.00087681593,0.00015401143,0.00010467549,0.00025103666,0.0003237966,0.21002227,0.00043779647,0.7629161,0.0025393756,0.022193441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040574814,0.000030841504,0.0001247544,0.000045559966,0.00003085339,0.000037212387,0.000055297376,0.40298167,0.00013602719,0.5948021,0.0016837845,0.00003134664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052529727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034283593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010430287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00359918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002916034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055161297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106102140","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01149.x","title":"Economic Development Prospects of Forest‐Dependent Communities: Analyzing Trade‐offs Using a Compromise‐Fuzzy Programming Framework","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Optimization and Mathematical Programming","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Weighting; Fuzzy logic; Diversification (marketing strategy); Rule of thumb; Economics; Computer science; Environmental economics; Natural resource economics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Marketing; Sociology; Algorithm","score_opus":0.016333784997525125,"score_gpt":0.21884270775520187,"score_spread":0.20250892275767673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106102140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78624564,0.00064234674,0.18982205,0.0017367231,0.000024799605,0.00012728598,0.00018161756,0.00003013031,0.021189451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777825,0.00016222028,0.010508427,0.000026415697,0.0000067302653,0.00006322201,0.000026450942,0.000008125647,0.0014202473],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903524,0.00058204413,0.00001704658,0.000076951146,0.000107959444,0.0001807222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967746,0.0023600322,0.0002768435,0.000060217128,0.0002009994,0.00032722988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038052043,0.00070082967,0.0007078872,0.0013850142,0.0009325378,0.002905174,0.0009646358,0.0018503072,0.0034624098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00813257,0.00057097734,0.00094562536,0.001143778,0.0013397398,0.0019230611,0.0022601234,0.0015752345,0.00013799264],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105521365,0.0000817212,0.003880025,0.000051196574,0.00009389956,0.00032616142,0.00022309854,0.94305575,0.0005695891,0.04468821,0.00030032016,0.0066244355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014934351,0.00008783995,0.0017784005,0.000033359305,0.000029721015,0.000065038366,0.0004481827,0.9499396,0.0002090713,0.046939466,0.0004349714,0.000019441803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048169685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004199204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048169685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027927428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009537339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020262897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109439360","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar121","title":"Does Regulation of Manure Land Application Work Against Agglomeration Economies? Theory and Evidence from the French Hog Sector","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economies of agglomeration; Ceteris paribus; Manure; Externality; Productivity; Production (economics); Economics; Work (physics); Natural resource economics; Dispersion (optics); Agricultural economics; Economic geography; Microeconomics; Ecology; Economic growth; Biology","score_opus":0.01729462192506248,"score_gpt":0.18212038796371846,"score_spread":0.16482576603865598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109439360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699127,0.0027139694,0.006228919,0.0042179828,0.000017653585,0.000027032364,0.00013572162,0.0000854506,0.016660534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829894,0.0005653029,0.00039425344,0.00023954293,0.00001367396,0.00000684777,0.000040689898,0.0000038669573,0.0004369104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811137,0.0009617145,0.000062161474,0.0002667945,0.00022082777,0.0003771257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98751163,0.0060222046,0.0040911566,0.0012336532,0.000752265,0.00038917924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029879499,0.00034723655,0.00072596123,0.0009022033,0.0008986592,0.0017810839,0.0008259609,0.0013797409,0.0036624244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007772159,0.00023130412,0.0008801377,0.0009845294,0.0027900604,0.00124872,0.0011160951,0.0004960142,0.0004321441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001572047,0.001051199,0.55699754,0.0011204056,0.0016892768,0.00161621,0.0023471734,0.11547562,0.020350428,0.1736447,0.006606518,0.117528886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057580706,0.0017297217,0.740006,0.0003013659,0.0012043741,0.0003231584,0.0057627265,0.08531901,0.012691124,0.113352604,0.038558803,0.00017523549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05338821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042755187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05338821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030752206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016539177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10615492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110128425","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aap012","title":"The Value of the Initial Payment of the Canadian Wheat Board as a Signaling Device","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Institut de Recherche et de Développement en Agroenvironnement","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Payment; Incentive; Business; Value (mathematics); Complete information; Signaling game; Microeconomics; Commerce; Industrial organization; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.00978389913814647,"score_gpt":0.1982479999537072,"score_spread":0.18846410081556073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110128425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7466901,0.0009649712,0.07497145,0.005068056,0.00022728072,0.00030665012,0.0005448818,0.00018913005,0.17103748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925885,0.00013363807,0.0040264213,0.00011518619,0.000017163993,0.000021442207,0.000031134085,0.000006185422,0.0030603555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978709,0.0007533987,0.000056729677,0.00020005347,0.00048725205,0.0006316431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98837984,0.0071434197,0.0015564408,0.0005468032,0.0014210627,0.0009523496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037288317,0.0006965605,0.0007898321,0.00085733604,0.0020455215,0.0032011198,0.0014320047,0.0022841697,0.0071143247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020172473,0.00042098676,0.00043449877,0.0006916631,0.0031063405,0.0022145293,0.0011864037,0.0020501404,0.00033039486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011445017,0.00021008503,0.008276224,0.00022758628,0.00011204363,0.00080134755,0.0005987528,0.20644224,0.015395896,0.7314596,0.0056553273,0.029676395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006640452,0.0006741718,0.013555543,0.00020525462,0.0003176415,0.00038960733,0.0015091958,0.7433016,0.007995218,0.21344183,0.01764319,0.0003026869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15807386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11969141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84192616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011435356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3143075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111894607","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar019","title":"Market Evidence of Packer Willingness to Pay for Traceability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Food Supply Chain Traceability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Traceability; Willingness to pay; Pound (networking); Economics; Price premium; Business; Econometrics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03484453849821808,"score_gpt":0.2290924356786372,"score_spread":0.19424789718041913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111894607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968328,0.0005654821,0.0007455099,0.0013345463,0.000020716814,0.000020419802,0.0012529641,0.0000198415,0.02771249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371815,0.00020031237,0.0001792697,0.00020359766,0.000015569183,0.000005714194,0.0005617002,0.0000047766375,0.005110999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947995,0.0000997756,0.000023150551,0.000081430895,0.00021800706,0.00009766193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98655,0.005877571,0.0039969464,0.0008549794,0.0020824352,0.0006380713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017900007,0.00013524426,0.00022391003,0.0006857775,0.0004890421,0.00091070094,0.00038913486,0.00070427806,0.017695904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089770295,0.00013987729,0.00026221384,0.0006296749,0.0006671968,0.0008406655,0.00024886423,0.0005951081,0.0011049918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013627032,0.00056368526,0.94010663,0.00020879343,0.00029174582,0.00034653122,0.0014695588,0.0015114709,0.0035464952,0.0069956686,0.0063254656,0.03727135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017307786,0.0001470563,0.9934674,0.000020242554,0.000022302875,0.0000483297,0.0006332335,0.0007874604,0.0002689444,0.0006239601,0.003949963,0.0000138613705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23844995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27630484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23844995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017358648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006979772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.474124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112295864","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00045","title":"The Economic Threshold with a Stochastic Pest Population: A Real Options Approach","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"PEST analysis; Pest control; Randomness; Integrated pest management; Population; Economic threshold; Agriculture; Sensitivity (control systems); Mathematics; Econometrics; Agricultural engineering; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010243581214599989,"score_gpt":0.18822614026743714,"score_spread":0.17798255905283716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112295864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10794609,0.0023089873,0.8425098,0.008319583,0.0002855097,0.00012565537,0.0003024769,0.00016675059,0.03803508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415758,0.0013471385,0.034114607,0.00047554166,0.00030227556,0.00022159096,0.00010776692,0.00008818265,0.021767156],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986135,0.0006480268,0.000054515935,0.00020515124,0.00022275753,0.00025602584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946561,0.0038242768,0.000459644,0.0001835357,0.00034293922,0.00053359265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035613598,0.0011854719,0.0020029377,0.0014747081,0.00082427356,0.0035871153,0.0029448213,0.003977556,0.007884289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010374901,0.0011101775,0.0021765893,0.0009136848,0.0029655346,0.005476713,0.0021672784,0.0041690483,0.0005284703],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033600852,0.000053244465,0.00051628606,0.000045634362,0.000052229712,0.00033272576,0.000078091776,0.601012,0.00044562257,0.39442155,0.00074483897,0.0022642422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015922462,0.000019503137,0.00016010388,0.000016094486,0.000016172,0.000044227076,0.00002858321,0.87143505,0.00005875071,0.12757598,0.00061095384,0.000018716495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058164955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029607713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007884289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003951151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022366268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028667688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113524697","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01061.x","title":"Traceability, Liability, and Incentives for Food Safety and Quality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Food Supply Chain Traceability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics","keywords":"Traceability; Business; SAFER; Food safety; Stylized fact; Incentive; Liability; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Economics; Finance; Food science","score_opus":0.016977047752923656,"score_gpt":0.23726036938137066,"score_spread":0.220283321628447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113524697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8903469,0.000850175,0.052267812,0.0080305375,0.0000864522,0.00027177733,0.0005848123,0.000097463875,0.04746404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558085,0.00012632106,0.001472828,0.00015679793,0.000031508123,0.000034865607,0.000028119375,0.000003072245,0.0025656656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979686,0.0009389259,0.00009798426,0.00023983228,0.00028614793,0.0004684484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974835,0.014678648,0.0070400345,0.0010223998,0.00096853805,0.0014554212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003383814,0.0004958055,0.00065481645,0.00084487186,0.0010366124,0.002600949,0.0007374275,0.0036769083,0.015052112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016006796,0.0006518324,0.0005426668,0.0006484384,0.0032136983,0.003159866,0.0021520057,0.0016238117,0.00035562878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076432124,0.0009986565,0.06680352,0.0003002229,0.00018227656,0.0008577398,0.0004070782,0.23415905,0.0061138705,0.6619424,0.003680892,0.023789892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057100283,0.00092023844,0.05581941,0.00015157402,0.00014445744,0.00053877203,0.0007262672,0.26065695,0.0018096919,0.6699937,0.00851982,0.00014803739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048403353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035602145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015052112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032788976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017898398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050354302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115174717","doi":"10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00561.x","title":"Inserting GM Products into the Food Chain: The Market and Welfare Effects of Different Labeling and Regulatory Regimes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Business; Food chain; Food labeling; Food science; Chemistry; Industrial organization; Economics; Biology; Market economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.006257221565785301,"score_gpt":0.17852644327778028,"score_spread":0.172269221711995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115174717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345576,0.002890598,0.009134301,0.0067431163,0.000115360184,0.000120582554,0.00029724033,0.000041412834,0.046099804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99463403,0.0009888461,0.0012706434,0.0009979616,0.00007465579,0.00005020649,0.00005105299,0.000012701115,0.001919903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953793,0.002905208,0.000088575944,0.00038796733,0.0006519448,0.0005870629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97116673,0.022079116,0.0041333465,0.0009301933,0.0012964301,0.00039428013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007174955,0.0005185913,0.0006407721,0.00092743355,0.0011406456,0.0036886993,0.0008311551,0.0031454572,0.008690429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014258874,0.00031162758,0.0010670511,0.0008723676,0.00578855,0.0041650734,0.002449981,0.0018373977,0.00041969732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016989864,0.005044574,0.09141611,0.0015350428,0.0018008712,0.0018806831,0.0027114968,0.08229972,0.06965194,0.49077338,0.005865732,0.23003048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015515623,0.010917068,0.2404172,0.0005274102,0.0020370537,0.0005779363,0.00954503,0.0380973,0.040207826,0.63216877,0.023614105,0.00033875537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018651295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023975268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008690429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029455142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092689425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03794521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119403851","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00183","title":"Modeling Recreation Site Choice: Do Hypothetical Choices Reflect Actual Behavior?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Revealed preference; Aggregate (composite); Preference; Aggregate data; Econometrics; Sample (material); Test site; Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Ecology; Engineering; Chemistry; Biology","score_opus":0.06488143752056506,"score_gpt":0.24144307605307888,"score_spread":0.17656163853251383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119403851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98643714,0.000023340457,0.012928038,0.00012219265,0.000002837376,0.00001216721,0.00014191233,0.000017591488,0.000314773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979645,0.000017900586,0.0017143486,0.000011203119,0.000002743584,0.000014130312,0.00011464654,0.0000022095326,0.00015830052],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983564,0.001228176,0.00004295097,0.0001895167,0.0000820053,0.000100953126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825106,0.013370771,0.001834711,0.0015183107,0.00043604415,0.00032943152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005223279,0.00035654922,0.00060299743,0.0005204947,0.00024167297,0.0010094979,0.0011881681,0.0009765108,0.002105543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025702022,0.00043139808,0.0006176538,0.0009094485,0.00089637935,0.0019784642,0.00057983113,0.00091180624,0.00030093666],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006590142,0.0005300433,0.24400972,0.000052796306,0.00027165562,0.000119821954,0.00042017343,0.7298444,0.00056261086,0.008582126,0.00041904015,0.014528613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022992415,0.0001398682,0.023892354,0.0000073115157,0.000023298457,0.000031208165,0.00011026186,0.96866167,0.00019138459,0.006767483,0.00013731474,0.000014884413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010085562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010668957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010085562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008496677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047574818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027623653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119613640","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aat098","title":"Portfolio Speculation and Commodity Price Volatility in a Stochastic Storage Model","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Speculation; Futures contract; Economics; Portfolio; Volatility (finance); Financial economics; Cash; Mid price; Contango; Monetary economics; Price level; Finance","score_opus":0.010823424656281968,"score_gpt":0.19376512128253282,"score_spread":0.18294169662625084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119613640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96487415,0.00013438263,0.030377699,0.00054636155,0.00002394397,0.000020493726,0.00017078164,0.00009821766,0.003754134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858874,0.00004081739,0.00069503515,0.000015547681,0.0000056783992,0.000008840455,0.00003432596,0.0000055242226,0.0006054378],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967766,0.0001325118,0.000020371172,0.000046405425,0.000057018926,0.00006605952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716693,0.001861649,0.000528416,0.000111172514,0.00018243292,0.00014937458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012545366,0.000469262,0.0009314163,0.0005183168,0.00036641277,0.0017009921,0.0007567331,0.001316665,0.0018587586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005106292,0.00044286094,0.0005380199,0.00048828445,0.0010436927,0.0015305862,0.00068858213,0.00093425467,0.0001280105],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009238889,0.000024503273,0.0017554399,0.000008887465,0.000023018587,0.00008289019,0.000025167143,0.98683923,0.0006291597,0.0097599765,0.00011936359,0.0006400333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013528003,0.000020583548,0.00022440896,0.0000012134643,0.0000058751007,0.000007991866,0.0000062114054,0.99725443,0.00009613356,0.0023377326,0.000026808706,0.0000050630592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010130412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036068796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010130412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010312668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087181287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020142853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120129053","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaq061","title":"Interactions Between Incentive Instruments: Contracts and Quality in Processing Tomatoes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics","keywords":"Incentive; Complementarity (molecular biology); Quality (philosophy); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Business; Profit (economics); Product (mathematics); Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.04185579153305735,"score_gpt":0.36303186990443903,"score_spread":0.3211760783713817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120129053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534488,0.0008363361,0.02891256,0.0012414495,0.000036790774,0.00026604295,0.00014388259,0.000023908815,0.015090129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935777,0.00019790822,0.0047664987,0.00007438117,0.000017835773,0.0000700846,0.00003996737,0.0000050779577,0.0012504719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900007,0.006373906,0.0005329192,0.00071035634,0.0014598527,0.0009221226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8496715,0.11320567,0.026789056,0.004150504,0.0031860608,0.0029972661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019435236,0.0005544294,0.0012378755,0.0009956155,0.0013415944,0.003802292,0.001202945,0.0023262613,0.007923678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070082486,0.00054430094,0.00085195474,0.0015387485,0.0043979743,0.0057873596,0.0024384777,0.0022362927,0.00024259296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006795317,0.0049252226,0.14453481,0.0012215995,0.00061094953,0.00083411584,0.0020176792,0.12860015,0.015889334,0.58209944,0.0019082353,0.11056322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015160246,0.0038985005,0.14068079,0.00037564558,0.00061118376,0.00050498237,0.0020549854,0.20961148,0.008242165,0.6249939,0.007264427,0.00024590603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023895043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022412958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019435236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034213671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026239855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10278463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121095445","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00086","title":"Constrained Efficient Contracts for Area Yield Crop Insurance","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Payment; Crop insurance; Constraint (computer-aided design); Lump sum; Value (mathematics); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Agriculture; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.009658425243326137,"score_gpt":0.19128958991782072,"score_spread":0.18163116467449458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121095445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09920643,0.0007706982,0.86538184,0.0011294226,0.000096952725,0.00036023027,0.00032963752,0.00012630038,0.03259854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91976637,0.00046184112,0.068023056,0.000098604636,0.00005901973,0.000309402,0.00012339128,0.00005098777,0.011107382],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610597,0.0021073124,0.00020124883,0.0004996743,0.000608239,0.0004775058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98700666,0.008941658,0.001676552,0.0008735474,0.00084049546,0.00066110183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006149666,0.0009168521,0.001406911,0.00070603105,0.00065994187,0.001998035,0.0014431635,0.0019438945,0.0079205595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015960993,0.00081033213,0.000579533,0.00073516427,0.0019858936,0.0025340987,0.0018419411,0.001949263,0.0005096841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017992759,0.000101126774,0.0004233704,0.00010290009,0.000033094173,0.0001585111,0.00012172303,0.51136476,0.0010563643,0.46987468,0.0017876214,0.014795945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082887265,0.00009248444,0.00026735637,0.000054141965,0.000015772568,0.000059824277,0.00005151001,0.75781655,0.00043721215,0.2367769,0.004321875,0.000023490144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024787018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017063266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0079205595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026208838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023925207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032522917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123540412","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00407","title":"The Effect of Age on the Probability of Participation in Wildlife‐Related Activities: A Birth Year Cohort Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Waterfowl; Recreation; Logistic regression; Geography; Demography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Statistics; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027209230048722482,"score_gpt":0.2033861145183524,"score_spread":0.17617688446962992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123540412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986533,0.00012893665,0.00021767203,0.000095015734,0.0000130730195,0.000007531657,0.0005075905,0.0000034841194,0.0003733805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884415,0.00010529279,0.0000989605,0.000020332729,0.000008784769,0.0000069124417,0.000229155,0.0000033799831,0.0006829486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998667,0.00060180435,0.00009410334,0.000221151,0.00017026805,0.00024570702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98939836,0.0043163095,0.0022848533,0.001400103,0.000946505,0.001653884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004385627,0.0002920737,0.00029977836,0.0008368938,0.0006141991,0.0009946784,0.00072541385,0.0007661073,0.003584442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010465826,0.00045895405,0.0010033351,0.0007235873,0.00042971713,0.0006971765,0.0006220144,0.0014188463,0.00053802715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002892579,0.00010191734,0.9979771,0.0000028961838,0.000118691845,0.000107251646,0.00015102666,0.00008524629,0.000088359295,0.00007500521,0.00010030836,0.0009029806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009764773,0.00027502936,0.9981179,0.0000057893767,0.00009080177,0.00014450935,0.00025186778,0.0007603791,0.000074296004,0.000059351154,0.0002009134,0.000009317202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03815864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02497834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03815864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033336997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005647326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07587308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124116209","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00167","title":"Empirical Specification Requirements for Two‐Constraint Models of Recreation Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Economics; Recreation; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Marginal utility; Observable; Specification; Mathematics","score_opus":0.16570860398225257,"score_gpt":0.27854688411141415,"score_spread":0.11283828012916158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124116209","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33601883,0.00065019616,0.6129067,0.012925122,0.00015704044,0.0010357338,0.007738819,0.0008359866,0.027731696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417257,0.00035877796,0.043381054,0.0011424208,0.00017664747,0.0013976771,0.0068685682,0.00015828207,0.0047909603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98753554,0.007022152,0.00139401,0.0014187646,0.0014542356,0.0011753041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6618304,0.29744673,0.019559862,0.011016356,0.007887373,0.0022592498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027613742,0.0012264358,0.0024623969,0.001660061,0.0011347936,0.006281149,0.0036805542,0.0042193867,0.022413919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21426359,0.0017600022,0.0024473614,0.0026508032,0.002812665,0.0055472148,0.0040212004,0.0043119253,0.0018540025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003738187,0.00047007357,0.045517214,0.00034897792,0.00031316085,0.0009961053,0.0008816491,0.19357042,0.0006474936,0.7302346,0.007363964,0.019282475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048435337,0.000101198,0.006273734,0.00011941722,0.00007204772,0.00018224795,0.00047942754,0.5572198,0.00034244897,0.43010223,0.0045516784,0.00007143892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014507826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077374857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027613742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022797578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036728983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14603716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126719825","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01030.x","title":"Is Exchange Rate Pass‐Through in Pork Meat Export Prices Constrained by the Supply of Live Hogs?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Economics; Exchange-rate pass-through; Exchange rate; Production (economics); Econometrics; Estimator; Unit root; Agricultural economics; Degree (music); Monetary economics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.031575052999188925,"score_gpt":0.22233924784508388,"score_spread":0.19076419484589496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126719825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968267,0.00008591091,0.0011147549,0.00014029421,0.0000032235482,0.000003941965,0.00014740264,0.0000142121135,0.0016636861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993517,0.000062557025,0.0001186637,0.000013665684,0.0000058290957,0.0000018887054,0.00013138796,0.0000057582733,0.00030854816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958473,0.00011321409,0.000045812434,0.000077702636,0.00006515782,0.00011336264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842613,0.007599828,0.005573813,0.0012101972,0.00085222465,0.00050267996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020998279,0.0002901935,0.00061593164,0.00075769535,0.00026757258,0.002441284,0.00036678303,0.0004778857,0.004527258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014816753,0.00040957605,0.00043063672,0.000806909,0.001223922,0.0015156773,0.0005536758,0.0006535383,0.00052226265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021895755,0.00016056863,0.9087638,0.00014565067,0.0005139343,0.0013353127,0.0011751615,0.026895726,0.011713556,0.018148566,0.001089572,0.027868472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004952733,0.00012975423,0.9587739,0.000028584534,0.00014916601,0.00029372235,0.0006408261,0.026230896,0.002758494,0.0100833215,0.00081531366,0.00004655942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013499419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005670274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013499419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075067335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000461932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02684164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130414852","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00118","title":"Managing Urban Deer","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Opposition (politics); Wildlife management; Population; Environmental planning; Population control; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Control (management); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Environmental science; Political science; Engineering; Sociology; Demography; Research methodology","score_opus":0.004295510657669727,"score_gpt":0.1698287436776559,"score_spread":0.16553323301998618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130414852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91971266,0.0018638357,0.0075587644,0.008508433,0.00010670449,0.00011926711,0.00008561396,0.000080317805,0.061964396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875701,0.0013965092,0.0028027364,0.00036693405,0.00007543484,0.00006463314,0.00009545465,0.00000694871,0.007621265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996978,0.00013049672,0.000008838869,0.000026251844,0.000041973737,0.0000947199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915135,0.00012905805,0.0002225154,0.000040796396,0.00013955633,0.00031666772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008501363,0.00016481994,0.00007948261,0.00045464883,0.0010945721,0.0010749963,0.00081927294,0.00034899384,0.0027100553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008800933,0.00008256374,0.00007522604,0.0003295474,0.00054112554,0.00060660625,0.001427076,0.00030267084,0.00031095362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000288342,0.0014862419,0.26053885,0.00054452155,0.00012351797,0.0016833353,0.008649324,0.014788626,0.010805083,0.03188337,0.07481282,0.59439594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025010406,0.0030056997,0.22046675,0.001201798,0.0002580705,0.0031727962,0.08269992,0.033805974,0.014260968,0.046343226,0.5944021,0.000132644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027779352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010214423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027779352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064251764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014561324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009065986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130794533","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar009","title":"Relaxing Heteroscedasticity Assumptions in Area‐Yield Crop Insurance Rating","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Homoscedasticity; Heteroscedasticity; Crop insurance; Economics; Yield (engineering); Actuarial science; Econometrics; Sample (material); Statistics; Mathematics; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.029002559337964917,"score_gpt":0.19934466260945843,"score_spread":0.17034210327149352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130794533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30118844,0.00019890239,0.68957746,0.00069410587,0.00013118128,0.00039458578,0.00081109884,0.00042966523,0.0065745893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622902,0.0000910991,0.035464313,0.0001899987,0.000048052752,0.0001325967,0.00053366396,0.000040864106,0.0012090813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608099,0.02285947,0.0034000357,0.0056270743,0.0058414885,0.0014620387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77436244,0.15980336,0.018165741,0.04072596,0.006359343,0.0005832261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06306772,0.0006970386,0.0008728664,0.0005849286,0.0007132904,0.0020130093,0.0022718809,0.0010515247,0.003355156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19522537,0.0006333053,0.001763578,0.0009501961,0.0021503137,0.003408845,0.0016060759,0.0033067963,0.0007206248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018053139,0.00077791186,0.33290133,0.0006130415,0.0034969314,0.0015695641,0.0029660868,0.2542668,0.018817557,0.21098182,0.003376914,0.16842675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026338067,0.00225317,0.28453976,0.00018690278,0.0011400394,0.0013291524,0.001377079,0.49588072,0.04298715,0.16437232,0.0053425664,0.00032769097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052100625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046074307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06306772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015849787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016731062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33353794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136252054","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaq011","title":"Understanding International Trade in Agricultural Products: One Hundred Years of Contributions by Agricultural Economists","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Economics; International trade; Agricultural productivity; International economics; Agricultural economics; International market; Adaptation (eye); Trade barrier; Production (economics); Agreement on Agriculture; World trade; Macroeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.036090196540496555,"score_gpt":0.20353344650670027,"score_spread":0.16744324996620372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136252054","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029157998,0.8509671,0.016668102,0.05711102,0.0030485068,0.00002443233,0.0001551232,0.000033045813,0.04283467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18753926,0.78076035,0.009334264,0.0067671994,0.007847016,0.000046146062,0.00017122336,0.00004157158,0.0074929614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930227,0.00027663595,0.000045130644,0.000101008016,0.00020721527,0.000067743305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958437,0.0031584206,0.0002160238,0.00021301242,0.00040489246,0.00016388428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028182045,0.0008029439,0.0007960849,0.004265994,0.00093851564,0.0053829974,0.000559605,0.00197373,0.00308739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051383483,0.0005494459,0.0004352794,0.008027209,0.005132307,0.010939974,0.0036046782,0.0035823376,0.0004992321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010995571,0.0002764977,0.006623051,0.0015425863,0.00014527241,0.00021215287,0.0030433147,0.011502569,0.00080235954,0.59340376,0.037480935,0.3448575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106446105,0.000051876472,0.0062634796,0.00203029,0.00003284974,0.0001497084,0.003547459,0.0049218675,0.00025205524,0.61531043,0.36738926,0.000040112234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015287137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017517713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053829974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022640722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008202115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01642704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136481553","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav051","title":"The Natural Resource Curse and Fiscal Decentralization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología; Generalitat Valenciana","keywords":"Decentralization; Resource curse; Natural resource; Boom; Economics; Curse; Blessing; Resource (disambiguation); Politics; Economic system; Development economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Political science; Ecology; Market economy; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.015377541701529295,"score_gpt":0.19909775555829753,"score_spread":0.18372021385676823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136481553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96383846,0.0015073344,0.0061415457,0.003785949,0.000041834635,0.00002844241,0.0004996378,0.000070932736,0.024085987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986265,0.00022117788,0.00022365639,0.00009804305,0.000016399272,0.0000058272767,0.00006888126,0.000004288405,0.0007353878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992341,0.00019732089,0.000055652934,0.00014418183,0.00009508759,0.00027377144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925553,0.0013003824,0.004691265,0.00051835366,0.0003145604,0.0006200902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020499385,0.00020477852,0.00083563954,0.00097017974,0.00094086863,0.0016738645,0.0003156183,0.0005265649,0.005118098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007144568,0.0002568132,0.0005162484,0.0013167327,0.0019361711,0.0017970932,0.0024714626,0.0010795004,0.0001526373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060539634,0.00026324656,0.4645976,0.00042980234,0.0007871313,0.0010773928,0.0011820237,0.13860524,0.002529321,0.3386458,0.0071022813,0.04417476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031891916,0.00031712005,0.58901817,0.00028666135,0.0003143343,0.0007351882,0.0022393926,0.046354014,0.0019568454,0.3256814,0.032661855,0.00011606104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0120878285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0170876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120878285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017253911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018094986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024034917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138717423","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau012","title":"Capitalized Costs of Habitat Conservation Easements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Acre; Habitat; Habitat conservation; Agricultural land; Agriculture; Land use; Matching (statistics); Business; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02625508370673155,"score_gpt":0.1889658555521663,"score_spread":0.16271077184543475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138717423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93101424,0.0009860104,0.019366184,0.0016665211,0.00012181313,0.00020264805,0.003390538,0.00022958279,0.043022383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919795,0.00025359553,0.0016252772,0.00005817237,0.000032149524,0.000022358381,0.00071170524,0.000008682891,0.005308556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985246,0.00031704514,0.00012769873,0.0001726329,0.00048094234,0.00037711687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943638,0.0019380414,0.0018784608,0.00084347295,0.0004908448,0.00048533446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011930895,0.000364967,0.0003666032,0.0008911985,0.00052494096,0.0026179673,0.00081732153,0.0008697916,0.009812012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011023095,0.00040227865,0.00062215223,0.0012030309,0.00097493053,0.0017095365,0.0010481736,0.0015804169,0.0005473045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011109298,0.0009424176,0.31948984,0.00035969433,0.0006413123,0.0018483228,0.0007566745,0.23731461,0.0041751545,0.23582384,0.009789771,0.18774743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019806398,0.0012987141,0.6478955,0.0002949926,0.0006492239,0.0032426221,0.0016060901,0.15509962,0.0047699404,0.13112967,0.053551763,0.000263742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008726608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013851834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009812012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030602932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001129365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032824516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138926224","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aap022","title":"The Effect of Strict Agricultural Zoning on Agricultural Land Values: The Case of Ontario's Greenbelt","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Legislation; Metropolitan area; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Boundary (topology); Geography; Land use; Land Values; Agricultural land; Environmental protection; Economics; Archaeology; Law; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.006052990814093039,"score_gpt":0.1846982669825664,"score_spread":0.17864527616847334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138926224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976014,0.0004506,0.0002532773,0.0022215433,0.00001182642,0.000024878158,0.00040232344,0.000008226761,0.020613197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978866,0.00018137255,0.000073427414,0.000072990704,0.0000048519946,0.000004352553,0.00007957293,0.0000024513647,0.0016944221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988287,0.00029563985,0.000032386604,0.00009352501,0.00023426616,0.0005154728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950492,0.0016315589,0.0012386767,0.00027569354,0.0008882881,0.0009165654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011295521,0.00016085994,0.00038887214,0.00067373674,0.0035008225,0.002837087,0.0010558722,0.00097248086,0.0041266484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072557162,0.0002372027,0.00050698855,0.001710375,0.0032931578,0.0009330097,0.0012589643,0.0009832709,0.00013420651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068713265,0.00024178685,0.88404405,0.00012425035,0.00029178223,0.002617998,0.0065658637,0.020879097,0.0016083078,0.06200387,0.0068589263,0.014076891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012620517,0.00011315245,0.9450349,0.00006296009,0.00019817175,0.0002001442,0.014252158,0.015053722,0.00042070798,0.008401262,0.016063055,0.000073609066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99014866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033059645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033059645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014716246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2398656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138995940","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas078","title":"Are Food Choices Really Habitual? Integrating Habits, Variety‐seeking, and Compensatory Choice in a Utility‐maximizing Framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Technology Sydney; Göteborgs Universitet; University of Arizona","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Food choice; Selection (genetic algorithm); Consumer choice; Cognition; Economics; Management science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Psychology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.045421486717174255,"score_gpt":0.21803744637150949,"score_spread":0.17261595965433524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138995940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8510809,0.0008276146,0.12940376,0.0020391466,0.0000269124,0.00006545357,0.00020654032,0.00006388224,0.016285794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935947,0.0001647154,0.005188651,0.00007784561,0.000014998687,0.0000245255,0.000036434107,0.000005807866,0.0008922047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920386,0.00043376698,0.000026594998,0.00016465099,0.00006862378,0.000102541606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962953,0.0021283086,0.0006140727,0.00044646504,0.00019678034,0.00031915057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020899484,0.00036937476,0.00066836306,0.0007652033,0.00047756376,0.002096678,0.0008517685,0.0008377367,0.0027216244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005872594,0.00036119437,0.0008531518,0.00070397416,0.002492468,0.002673896,0.0011391204,0.001033267,0.00015845541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040476114,0.00053956953,0.13649826,0.00016329126,0.0004206757,0.0005837889,0.0019345592,0.0847256,0.0022582847,0.72163814,0.00089423894,0.049938895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032670912,0.00016438757,0.070746996,0.00004463294,0.00008484582,0.00020888707,0.00063433836,0.26098794,0.00026603817,0.66487426,0.0018954044,0.000059668535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056417533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005280124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056417533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011161418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000612381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011217833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139689717","doi":"10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00713.x","title":"Milk by Any Other Name … Consumer Benefits from Labeled Milk","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer demand; Variety (cybernetics); Business; Agricultural science; Food science; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Chemistry; Statistics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.009316534885724875,"score_gpt":0.17872668202029973,"score_spread":0.16941014713457486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139689717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96037537,0.0005008852,0.0031235216,0.00088068406,0.000023471706,0.00003032437,0.0029195973,0.00007810073,0.032067996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901688,0.0002053848,0.00073017593,0.0001406216,0.000013345202,0.000013499291,0.0012099529,0.000008429285,0.007509788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959046,0.00013364226,0.000014933412,0.00004523563,0.00016827507,0.00004752241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974005,0.0015087386,0.00054300687,0.0002478861,0.00021385794,0.00008598014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054443924,0.00013667904,0.00016745017,0.00035466062,0.00020804311,0.00073846796,0.00017936064,0.0002227232,0.016144866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028289293,0.0000919247,0.000334011,0.0005044227,0.00020468736,0.00053010543,0.0003771835,0.0003709417,0.00097096263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034175408,0.000829388,0.6578929,0.00045750153,0.00065527007,0.0005472773,0.0005415982,0.028282115,0.012806792,0.047908355,0.015091715,0.2315696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114774986,0.0011464438,0.8495527,0.00010411328,0.00035436646,0.0005199683,0.001447742,0.03426346,0.011822387,0.03314918,0.06744317,0.0000817886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004130189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00733002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016144866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008784135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003239299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054009974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139730585","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00304","title":"Impact of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy on Agribusiness in the United Kingdom: Results of an Event Study of Equity Prices","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Agribusiness; Bovine spongiform encephalopathy; Distributed lag; Equity (law); Autoregressive model; Economics; Econometrics; Benchmark (surveying); Business; Agriculture; Biology; Internal medicine; Medicine","score_opus":0.06128127207341618,"score_gpt":0.287839087628646,"score_spread":0.22655781555522983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139730585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904424,0.00007529883,0.000058837006,0.000096688374,0.0000035399091,0.0000044675558,0.00025454347,0.000004380427,0.0004580922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934226,0.000045129655,0.000021243279,0.000013737239,0.0000045654597,0.0000016987451,0.00033222727,0.0000014743396,0.00023767295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.00034289292,0.00010282588,0.00009771449,0.00021439217,0.0002003723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848518,0.0067593,0.00557812,0.00059405033,0.0015881206,0.0006286322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010352544,0.0002582215,0.0003856189,0.0005557137,0.0002724545,0.001272072,0.00035111327,0.0005903626,0.0017619644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011324111,0.00016417215,0.0003078129,0.00083227764,0.0005090073,0.00079744734,0.0007611999,0.000744612,0.00029552064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015350472,0.0003244992,0.9753062,0.000051159503,0.00019010328,0.0015347194,0.00066785153,0.00896941,0.00085362984,0.0010795927,0.001472162,0.008015662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038354738,0.0002265306,0.98945415,0.0000067497645,0.000037948295,0.00014743257,0.0005935326,0.008244904,0.00036647054,0.00020130188,0.00066483585,0.000017855144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074733645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050706547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074733645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016506511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037858431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1485973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141209297","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00995.x","title":"Wildlife Damage and Agriculture: A Dynamic Analysis of Compensation Schemes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Wildlife; Damages; Compensation (psychology); Wildlife conservation; Stock (firearms); Natural resource economics; Welfare; Business; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.019598873636491373,"score_gpt":0.20269500415317612,"score_spread":0.18309613051668475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141209297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.615366,0.00483563,0.29017827,0.012423574,0.00026690727,0.0003544497,0.0016741118,0.00032043873,0.074580625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747533,0.0014380387,0.006393398,0.0002519546,0.00014355037,0.00010127317,0.00027076862,0.000049554827,0.016598148],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986765,0.00050784193,0.000043405038,0.00016909017,0.000166597,0.00043661465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123126,0.005317093,0.0021318751,0.00032019737,0.00043497654,0.00056455465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033886428,0.00075321354,0.0012368507,0.0017596169,0.0010046661,0.0033009066,0.0017718687,0.004013302,0.015631523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016375836,0.00064219785,0.001314712,0.0020687554,0.0019378482,0.0045177443,0.0014874147,0.0031957913,0.000826099],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024751548,0.0003158344,0.013345497,0.00012494161,0.00017122585,0.00051370886,0.00034444098,0.48295513,0.0012281878,0.46606368,0.0070315,0.027658349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008003233,0.00017903795,0.008939822,0.00006753514,0.000091988295,0.00023340732,0.0003347593,0.80602837,0.00018254602,0.17723422,0.006564703,0.00006364822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01626264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010016426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01626264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039889007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014345755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052292645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141713631","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00014","title":"The Impact of the Canada‐United States Free Trade Agreement on U.S. Wine Exports","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade agreement; Economics; Tariff; International economics; Wine; Exchange rate; International trade; Agricultural economics; Free trade; Monetary economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.005966325502595576,"score_gpt":0.18047115670579514,"score_spread":0.17450483120319957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141713631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91170526,0.0015038544,0.00014646378,0.0043446054,0.00011299983,0.000035777903,0.008056081,0.000037120026,0.074057825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805776,0.00087283546,0.00007598054,0.00040614314,0.000026238346,0.000006167817,0.0025320773,0.00001517557,0.015487868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988845,0.00007522693,0.000024246558,0.000050812814,0.00044794646,0.00051720836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968426,0.0005395654,0.0003654418,0.00006349466,0.0017314845,0.00045735436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006262019,0.00024273498,0.000260311,0.0014313898,0.0020520205,0.0028072644,0.00034692237,0.00045228223,0.0075568226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029626726,0.00018067217,0.00042803626,0.001912624,0.0010494561,0.00037197364,0.00067672064,0.000978632,0.000370897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013113038,0.00045638866,0.80526143,0.0002231321,0.00030301945,0.0013649777,0.0020085545,0.019547971,0.0016516909,0.02468473,0.08356447,0.059622232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038670638,0.00006449715,0.9543305,0.0000869037,0.00012286725,0.000060729453,0.0032244103,0.0034134223,0.0013265159,0.0008191678,0.036466174,0.000046135196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98453784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029158894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029158894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023611488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21156353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142897576","doi":"10.1111/1467-8276.00506","title":"Spatial Market Arbitrage and Threshold Cointegration","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Economics; Arbitrage; Commodity; Econometrics; Multivariate statistics; Financial economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Finance","score_opus":0.019358926470064448,"score_gpt":0.18645933186875838,"score_spread":0.16710040539869392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142897576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98505497,0.00015141287,0.012829122,0.0001886867,0.000006378423,0.00000843944,0.00004251327,0.000031665215,0.0016868355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995365,0.000022424343,0.00031499728,0.0000047719236,0.0000022758857,0.000002474919,0.000022232887,0.0000014009468,0.00009291627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983917,0.0005412836,0.00015804464,0.0003050376,0.00027392304,0.00032989442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803798,0.010850019,0.005154149,0.0023413543,0.0008454436,0.00042932032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022189368,0.00019625915,0.00062881695,0.0010920449,0.00058124674,0.0015316511,0.00046498206,0.0006140074,0.0029088156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021824256,0.00018858426,0.00060929655,0.0016822697,0.0024664784,0.0028519714,0.0015543796,0.00078946946,0.00016645648],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008702994,0.00021843682,0.57937497,0.00021070406,0.0005680325,0.0027288373,0.0034590808,0.054184157,0.011853388,0.2935608,0.0012945279,0.051676773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013173805,0.0002549674,0.30103895,0.000041041134,0.0001807457,0.0014195772,0.0018283956,0.27278495,0.0047362857,0.41556218,0.0019305602,0.000090547415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035169588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027939794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035169588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050133246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005842981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011734962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143399535","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aar011","title":"Agricultural Distortions, Structural Change, and Economic Growth: A Cross‐Country Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Industrialisation; Economics; Convergence (economics); Per capita income; Structural change; Per capita; Sample (material); Development economics; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.022990849387121846,"score_gpt":0.2042592930559375,"score_spread":0.18126844366881567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143399535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786586,0.00033815874,0.0007677653,0.00015598017,0.0000102212125,0.000010653873,0.00024782537,0.000008412866,0.0005951804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858737,0.0002758421,0.00021765954,0.000022096292,0.00001373899,0.000007807811,0.00055072247,0.0000037021214,0.00032106022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993529,0.00028600456,0.000034259247,0.000086602486,0.000057325473,0.00018293592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423534,0.002828567,0.0014204399,0.0005665929,0.00037398326,0.00057511387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025011017,0.00041464248,0.0006280913,0.0016094684,0.0005305442,0.0013376405,0.00043891938,0.0006838571,0.0026401584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051246793,0.00027914252,0.0015341325,0.0015643716,0.00087488856,0.00073066,0.0015351613,0.0012499832,0.00032169835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062488933,0.00038925034,0.9345017,0.000049106515,0.0018415998,0.0007121364,0.00031913942,0.044150688,0.0008131229,0.0044843564,0.0017079493,0.0104059335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012214354,0.00045914672,0.90300983,0.000050174138,0.0010153376,0.00043870995,0.0014193424,0.08647808,0.00102489,0.0027995312,0.0031120812,0.00007075161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019839486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011967737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019839486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069696124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047934268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039448023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147364686","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00835.x","title":"Conservation Payments under Risk: A Stochastic Dominance Approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Emil Aaltosen Säätiö","keywords":"Payment; Stochastic dominance; Dominance (genetics); Natural resource economics; Extant taxon; Revenue; Economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.005221882929884777,"score_gpt":0.18428909380100938,"score_spread":0.1790672108711246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147364686","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020521563,0.001457816,0.9414214,0.0026347034,0.0001785279,0.00013595085,0.00041136396,0.00011634072,0.033122316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83480805,0.0042646015,0.12110842,0.000914106,0.0012372691,0.0005172835,0.00048503865,0.00020027738,0.036464892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938537,0.0027286606,0.0002397837,0.00065437006,0.0017693572,0.00075421686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882387,0.008923179,0.000727967,0.00039731778,0.0013116121,0.00040117055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008184414,0.0018425102,0.0020790969,0.0021880048,0.0011865948,0.0044906884,0.0025228374,0.0020893915,0.008299334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020826805,0.0009407426,0.001774839,0.0013531008,0.002471197,0.0047851717,0.0019348963,0.0033637036,0.000996182],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026310276,0.000073957795,0.00094641966,0.00011317598,0.0001211372,0.00027645502,0.00019612748,0.3057988,0.0005300467,0.66469955,0.0042777862,0.022940323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022738806,0.000042008665,0.0004214705,0.000051564664,0.00004052826,0.00016886939,0.00007327112,0.4323582,0.00013670178,0.5623017,0.004349604,0.000033392913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077916468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062722443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008299334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004083636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030312915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04328388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147657823","doi":"10.1111/0002-9092.00047","title":"How to Improve the Management of Renewable Resources: The Case of Canada's Northern Cod Fishery","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable resource; Stock (firearms); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource economics; Renewable energy; Fishery; Economics; Environmental economics; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.005777691864669554,"score_gpt":0.1553888950386212,"score_spread":0.14961120317395163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147657823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81975895,0.0022584468,0.11699684,0.0171323,0.00013630078,0.0002847039,0.00040863396,0.00041064178,0.042613257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98284584,0.00032882972,0.014873895,0.00018083626,0.0000101166,0.00001615258,0.000027742428,0.000014400504,0.0017021653],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990723,0.00029180004,0.000036423888,0.00008671128,0.00023264083,0.00028010987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787474,0.0009187615,0.00021521204,0.00015378238,0.00066537433,0.00017220741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032972582,0.00042653954,0.00048394824,0.00069867034,0.0015263166,0.0021020812,0.0010630225,0.0012159646,0.0016605661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010084459,0.00023004193,0.00031270285,0.00075476844,0.0014965828,0.0012216304,0.00093759963,0.0009882475,0.0001246372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012084627,0.00010513815,0.018004566,0.00011412343,0.000098382894,0.000552051,0.0004951586,0.85216594,0.0017714859,0.052608848,0.0050897184,0.068873666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012860584,0.00006551952,0.011630012,0.00010404534,0.00007845677,0.00007563189,0.0010531056,0.91216445,0.0034165278,0.061016776,0.01016177,0.00010515821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8542616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8615991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14573842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009705625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017511994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2931934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150849756","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00736.x","title":"Estimating the Structure of Market Reaction to News: Information Events and Lumber Futures Prices","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Aperiodic graph; Event study; Event (particle physics); Futures market; Inside information; Business; Economics; Econometrics; Financial economics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00356072094788252,"score_gpt":0.17736384251424592,"score_spread":0.1738031215663634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150849756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97396547,0.00009373976,0.023914209,0.00037607603,0.000017472381,0.000035245863,0.0004585972,0.00007372911,0.0010654537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677414,0.000051989304,0.0021132517,0.000024626705,0.000024449137,0.000015072662,0.00051438605,0.0000113244105,0.00047070844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984968,0.00076465524,0.000075971824,0.00036162994,0.00014789551,0.00015309411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481634,0.043581188,0.0051155277,0.0014059936,0.0009541359,0.0007799084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073398934,0.00046588073,0.00073658227,0.0016548905,0.00032688706,0.0017276963,0.0008944167,0.001651078,0.0026380033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04319435,0.0006663167,0.00072595634,0.0011598449,0.00079932006,0.0025760345,0.00092064816,0.0018079937,0.0004779775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013864897,0.00065856095,0.55372083,0.00008906655,0.0005233798,0.00043249576,0.0005107133,0.38674867,0.003923161,0.0144514,0.0016239819,0.035931125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003550081,0.000121714824,0.055076525,0.000006618186,0.000041643936,0.000055533324,0.00013703546,0.93897647,0.0007413704,0.0045027984,0.00027345956,0.000031378124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073248027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039548436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073398934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083364965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043558716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038817525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155958740","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01322.x","title":"Customs and Incentives in Contracts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Arizona","keywords":"Moral hazard; Cash; Incentive; Payment; Flexibility (engineering); Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Economics; Cash flow; Business; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Finance","score_opus":0.004323458225414299,"score_gpt":0.1751065950312929,"score_spread":0.1707831368058786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155958740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47911873,0.0030436588,0.15828732,0.018644685,0.00024850338,0.00027084898,0.00045821074,0.00019605682,0.3397319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98857284,0.0003302859,0.005281144,0.00027995737,0.00008438494,0.000053783806,0.000037848382,0.000017269653,0.005342484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98915076,0.0048320927,0.00094402465,0.001444224,0.0025546402,0.0010741793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546647,0.023872258,0.00967129,0.007164776,0.0031953754,0.0014315872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010910753,0.0002441853,0.00054825423,0.0012487569,0.002238117,0.004068041,0.00085186795,0.0020533742,0.009313932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0418319,0.00040542148,0.00047548203,0.0020763434,0.014246767,0.0047990214,0.0024350144,0.0023061924,0.0004924627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015516249,0.000017921127,0.0026382618,0.000031275005,0.000008291875,0.000051903604,0.00037650357,0.0024639943,0.0001323961,0.98570365,0.0005377859,0.008022338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002979624,0.00003447674,0.0049623735,0.00009560364,0.000007750208,0.00012668008,0.0003904501,0.004680127,0.00016042848,0.97519773,0.014294409,0.000020028454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032906185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022293665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010910753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003845321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030220884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057702243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158962388","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01163.x","title":"Promotion and Fast Food Demand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Business; Almost ideal demand system; On demand; Consumer demand; Market share; Economics; Marketing; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Commerce; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.014286084316228765,"score_gpt":0.18842214703648175,"score_spread":0.17413606272025298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158962388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925311,0.00027201066,0.0007108586,0.00036978917,0.0000054422294,0.000018438972,0.0015244199,0.000016487373,0.0045514307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976967,0.00010571747,0.0001238739,0.000015555155,0.0000064067613,0.0000062237327,0.00056956214,0.0000024524227,0.0014735081],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996674,0.00008403684,0.00001148454,0.00005121152,0.000082696024,0.000103184866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691427,0.0014778475,0.0008411716,0.0001648569,0.00023615561,0.00036575363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006308865,0.0001988245,0.00032546313,0.00050654827,0.00034906768,0.0013928608,0.00041009646,0.0005873235,0.013675187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031279605,0.0003125461,0.0004691668,0.00086765765,0.000625091,0.00045381667,0.0004033104,0.0008265159,0.0008389453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050817535,0.0003018314,0.96513647,0.00008331047,0.000116127354,0.00011914706,0.00039765297,0.016436117,0.001056037,0.0036396796,0.00092422654,0.011281273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054141685,0.0001856654,0.96848655,0.000037876445,0.000068799,0.00009966018,0.0007998064,0.023189241,0.00047994146,0.002813822,0.0037529522,0.000031588337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13664176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096200995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13664176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018219269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012119308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2716928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165588285","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau049","title":"Estimating the Impact of Minimum Wages on Employment, Wages, and Non‐Wage Benefits: The Case of Agriculture in South Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Economics; Wage; Minimum wage; Legislation; Agriculture; Margin (machine learning); Labour economics; Work (physics); Efficiency wage; Sample (material); Demographic economics; Geography","score_opus":0.015258936954483538,"score_gpt":0.2167947759197281,"score_spread":0.20153583896524455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165588285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982804,0.0001226148,0.000783669,0.00021103141,0.000003528638,0.000030492027,0.00013584108,0.0000036615058,0.00042869564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983442,0.00016143407,0.0008363561,0.000037287748,0.000007495889,0.000034276927,0.000193575,0.0000025559677,0.0003828444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690056,0.0019770882,0.00010483856,0.00025994307,0.00022190598,0.0005357395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848899,0.010989801,0.002942944,0.0004027377,0.00035539683,0.00041912557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040228525,0.0005675374,0.00086193444,0.001081858,0.0007203272,0.0013738268,0.0012607042,0.0010786189,0.0017778516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015753804,0.0005008715,0.001007058,0.0019168586,0.0009923881,0.0012900794,0.0019316955,0.0017071578,0.00020119015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000542849,0.00073471316,0.9242134,0.00023322098,0.0007756955,0.0014381481,0.0017248793,0.044632353,0.0015567583,0.0028201484,0.00059555966,0.020732157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010952677,0.00062726444,0.9344909,0.00009873465,0.00039809235,0.00014035568,0.0050911056,0.054962344,0.0011874475,0.0012893918,0.0015663833,0.000038453672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11610485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10653847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11610485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002471003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016034555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23085809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167794741","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01239.x","title":"Standards as Barriers Versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of HACCP Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Massachusetts; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Business; Hazard analysis and critical control points; Food safety; International trade; Critical control point; Perspective (graphical); Control (management); International economics; Food science; Economics; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01101540268306014,"score_gpt":0.31482357724791155,"score_spread":0.30380817456485143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167794741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976999,0.000054292435,0.0001451279,0.00011995311,0.0000051408606,0.000020468158,0.00016107994,0.0000044322524,0.0017895714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936515,0.000033944365,0.00010526516,0.000036141995,0.0000036001384,0.0000093164335,0.00019570516,0.0000015034727,0.0002494083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968637,0.0016325563,0.00011743795,0.00025370056,0.0007349945,0.00039759505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97503346,0.013852349,0.0061737443,0.0007129194,0.002974967,0.0012525246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048850095,0.00037201282,0.00033676653,0.000614812,0.00034508438,0.0016619753,0.00052347797,0.0005829653,0.0024271046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012203073,0.0002416635,0.0008332518,0.0010759466,0.00093611825,0.0010790116,0.0010966836,0.0011953276,0.00018576767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014792947,0.00084565894,0.96884906,0.000078270394,0.00061986665,0.00014451645,0.0002275485,0.015725348,0.0011277652,0.001702139,0.0006969029,0.008503646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006572565,0.0018287189,0.98135155,0.000027760918,0.00032560603,0.000018254943,0.0014017784,0.011232354,0.002091879,0.00059437985,0.0010391294,0.000022935883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048233442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041386068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048233442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021574365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023153431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09590542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168551943","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aat080","title":"Agricultural Prices, Selection, and the Evolution of the Food Industry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Productivity; Food industry; Economics; Agricultural economics; Falling (accident); Food processing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Fell; Industrial organization; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.006550377226603508,"score_gpt":0.15941470718550027,"score_spread":0.15286432995889676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168551943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631013,0.0005275213,0.015690867,0.002285575,0.000024408251,0.000031101306,0.00034848877,0.00007202845,0.017918622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957967,0.00023041108,0.00060466834,0.000059159167,0.00001709029,0.000008339776,0.00007230637,0.000007890748,0.0032035175],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998178,0.0000558534,0.000006436966,0.000043266944,0.00002629278,0.000050285205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900764,0.00043156935,0.00027118722,0.00005722184,0.00007310275,0.00015925775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006637691,0.00023700713,0.00041772114,0.0006476976,0.00044763467,0.0024406258,0.0004981397,0.0012374287,0.0064258315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028061192,0.00030061093,0.00045804013,0.0006395275,0.0010782111,0.0013011347,0.0005569904,0.0007916651,0.00092835526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059877604,0.00042605682,0.280402,0.00011201742,0.00016861613,0.0018496418,0.0009441124,0.36036822,0.007516232,0.30291188,0.0053185746,0.039383918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026845164,0.00033148404,0.15325335,0.00005669417,0.00009337346,0.00073409255,0.0008098544,0.50297195,0.0014664289,0.32862,0.011299135,0.00009522163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006330844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004777246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064258315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001222359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047687188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021496534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168606282","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00869.x","title":"Rejecting New Technology: The Case of Genetically Modified Wheat","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Agricultural economics; Genetically engineered; Veto; Genetically modified organism; Economics; Business; Agricultural science; Biotechnology; Political science; Market economy; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.012209911076408073,"score_gpt":0.21331543849210868,"score_spread":0.20110552741570062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168606282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11709968,0.008393351,0.012683696,0.2091324,0.000722871,0.00013677204,0.000091988746,0.00003739197,0.65170175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8813953,0.0057325973,0.005055565,0.052316383,0.0009715274,0.00019435801,0.000051049585,0.00007661835,0.054206755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892699,0.0033644857,0.00022927164,0.0012719657,0.0027141168,0.003150242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98869485,0.0076953005,0.0007646816,0.000930097,0.0009756787,0.00093943765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014981893,0.0007527127,0.0014397653,0.0012401621,0.016228834,0.015877659,0.0020656795,0.03554649,0.007069065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019260269,0.00067055656,0.0017844196,0.0013355954,0.028902085,0.011628033,0.006173665,0.017477242,0.00074171793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048664897,0.000039339368,0.001027591,0.000035385867,0.000021990578,0.0039632334,0.003095051,0.00060078345,0.000581729,0.9790547,0.007089549,0.0044420874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017351529,0.00011516238,0.0016646192,0.00036799264,0.00006656791,0.002530886,0.010355861,0.0026148781,0.0012479455,0.72837895,0.25235224,0.00013135473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0465454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05056246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0465454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011520643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068537346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09254891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171874924","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaq026","title":"The Combination of Gravity and Welfare Approaches for Evaluating Nontariff Measures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Welfare; Economics; Gravity equation; European union; Gravity model of trade; General equilibrium theory; Partial equilibrium; Econometrics; Estimation; International economics; Microeconomics; Bilateral trade; Geography","score_opus":0.06396378644343752,"score_gpt":0.22230683939795093,"score_spread":0.1583430529545134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171874924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24475949,0.0018415622,0.71664506,0.0018492229,0.00016793114,0.0005667747,0.00049617095,0.00019316815,0.03348068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93252146,0.0007135716,0.06432898,0.00016105454,0.00010472547,0.00032091897,0.00023590481,0.00003786638,0.0015755007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900928,0.006843602,0.00033913326,0.00039768455,0.0019476922,0.00037907032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98131275,0.011854185,0.0028103066,0.0015445644,0.0021085544,0.00036964024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013591582,0.0015437757,0.0012344721,0.008425134,0.000663538,0.0026070806,0.0014197567,0.0014751499,0.0033602556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028118344,0.00036446116,0.0020333438,0.0049934825,0.0041609104,0.0040865964,0.0037137468,0.0015652187,0.00023504303],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015703714,0.00037425678,0.02491579,0.00033990614,0.0005043519,0.00022034692,0.00026215936,0.23328005,0.0014277691,0.64108753,0.001772093,0.095658764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045647477,0.0005117863,0.021984253,0.00014874667,0.00013816655,0.00011433216,0.0005280037,0.40110213,0.001484793,0.5685518,0.0052843215,0.00010605758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027101224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023338743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013591582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028668726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017708753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07188004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180398075","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav037","title":"The Demonstration and Capture of the Value of an Ecosystem Service: A Quasi‐Experimental Hedonic Property Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Water Research Institute","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Irrigation; Revenue; Service (business); Ecosystem; Agency (philosophy); Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Offset (computer science); Property value; Environmental economics; Natural resource economics; Computer science; Economics; Ecology; Finance; Marketing","score_opus":0.029312855481903946,"score_gpt":0.19806834197059112,"score_spread":0.16875548648868716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180398075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97246087,0.000026904057,0.020563006,0.0002855627,0.00006355053,0.0017512008,0.00034316728,0.000028023751,0.0044778264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820226,0.000020886859,0.011589147,0.00014499198,0.00003357664,0.0042358036,0.0001546738,0.0000070800006,0.0017912386],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993277,0.0051316605,0.00021606333,0.00065857684,0.000415099,0.00030153396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634819,0.024683744,0.004338013,0.0062391297,0.00087407336,0.0003831656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011209286,0.0005392272,0.0004972552,0.00033812915,0.0010976263,0.0012051775,0.0013627846,0.0012450888,0.00633991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022240836,0.0005000505,0.0009722011,0.00039342724,0.0032283159,0.0016101701,0.001198991,0.0018012646,0.00044104896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03641343,0.30540562,0.17824964,0.001232694,0.0022854796,0.0011540795,0.007418286,0.09701165,0.06479328,0.20374675,0.0066604195,0.09562862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0125910705,0.20286815,0.23889837,0.00015320067,0.0013057811,0.00039805047,0.004298035,0.36535865,0.049312748,0.10207424,0.022278735,0.00046296095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029516544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019262542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011209286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016830524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088019855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05928105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215983692","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aau052","title":"By Ounce or by Calorie: The Differential Effects of Alternative Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Tax Strategies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; York University; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Economics; Fluid ounce (US); Calorie; Per capita; Subsidy; Agricultural economics; Environmental health; Medicine; Population","score_opus":0.004997062182172536,"score_gpt":0.17641303943677528,"score_spread":0.17141597725460275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215983692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991055,0.0010025186,0.0033308202,0.0007299629,0.000036416128,0.000043752727,0.00021241045,0.000021965725,0.003567059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976961,0.0003460976,0.0009371056,0.0001233963,0.000009706102,0.000011522303,0.000086285596,0.0000054859356,0.00078423123],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988949,0.0006447464,0.000030679414,0.00015190765,0.00013132427,0.0001464944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977896,0.0013251676,0.00034970418,0.00024304728,0.00016509436,0.00012740081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016598627,0.0005960586,0.00084015896,0.0005623201,0.0002448948,0.0014174558,0.00085783814,0.0008484849,0.0035718954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061056535,0.00019761547,0.0012793507,0.000514377,0.00072305306,0.0013825735,0.0009239466,0.0010198748,0.00020948645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012793784,0.0034225797,0.15739165,0.0006358007,0.0026027001,0.0009514471,0.0007960628,0.45247892,0.013811856,0.09179144,0.0025225007,0.26080123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076184236,0.0050834436,0.27747542,0.0001716716,0.0023207807,0.00028616044,0.0026570477,0.6124359,0.0072294204,0.08227866,0.009072777,0.00022680587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011663263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007533592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011663263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014282723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085821137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023190737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220090771","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav019","title":"The Political Economy of Food Price Volatility: The Case of Vietnam and Rice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Economics; Vietnamese; Elite; Monetary economics; Politics; Market economy; International economics; Financial economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03162286405331166,"score_gpt":0.20493587600644464,"score_spread":0.17331301195313298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220090771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7320635,0.0013747286,0.0017631456,0.027782137,0.00008844917,0.000020869893,0.000059218863,0.000009177916,0.23683874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708956,0.00027215437,0.000052376217,0.0003259741,0.000028463803,0.0000031087286,0.0000054109337,0.0000029775622,0.002220152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995049,0.00018829033,0.000005607962,0.000028979315,0.0000618794,0.0002104033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999,0.00049578794,0.0002023817,0.00003057553,0.00008737388,0.00018389897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084079645,0.0000817393,0.00018125626,0.00041044925,0.003121523,0.004177635,0.00032561552,0.0014159293,0.0036628174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019098305,0.00016159003,0.00020071727,0.0005578019,0.003971017,0.0016572422,0.001408743,0.0018538834,0.000119525495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076677796,0.000049869694,0.009534381,0.000028186776,0.000019320607,0.0034302848,0.010376628,0.0030761121,0.0003503376,0.9643985,0.0033916791,0.00526795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002137298,0.00012332322,0.053540178,0.00015133743,0.000050163744,0.0015231065,0.06952244,0.03191719,0.00071422517,0.7120867,0.13003951,0.00011813753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04731324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03237117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04731324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004255102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018901638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09407568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237035728","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaq116","title":"Bid‐Ask Spreads, Volume, and Volatility: Evidence from Livestock Markets","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Bid price; Market liquidity; Bid–ask spread; Futures contract; Futures market; Economics; Transaction cost; Ask price; Econometrics; Financial economics; Market microstructure; Monetary economics; Business; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.010688944827205463,"score_gpt":0.1872438460871697,"score_spread":0.17655490125996426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237035728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99378854,0.0012916571,0.0026172001,0.0002891718,0.0000060312045,0.000013891807,0.0002926759,0.000014045268,0.0016867097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981547,0.0005354251,0.00063472195,0.000038256218,0.00002835282,0.000008228384,0.00042039185,0.0000053152394,0.0001746661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981578,0.000878576,0.00018865372,0.00016897109,0.0004968563,0.00010912444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292438,0.051069852,0.014914044,0.0023320413,0.0017429577,0.00069733866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049270554,0.0003885357,0.00066133554,0.0020945878,0.00040429799,0.0019660147,0.00085566746,0.001013795,0.0030317355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04578745,0.00042796586,0.0007342793,0.0027378781,0.0010306514,0.0033021118,0.0012406411,0.00087357993,0.00040015325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011384994,0.00061702874,0.93865055,0.00021285196,0.001054431,0.00038034053,0.00066156086,0.014151993,0.0011871363,0.0077017783,0.00090200576,0.033341948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019643646,0.00053364335,0.93454856,0.000078604906,0.00041364023,0.00041076113,0.0006211264,0.04686474,0.0013466792,0.013133724,0.0017586694,0.00009341189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004464447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039531556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049270554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036807448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028670262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026057065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241599785","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav041","title":"Simultaneous Allocation of Bundled Goods through Auctions: Assessing the Case for Joint Bidding","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Bidding; Common value auction; Microeconomics; Joint (building); Revenue; Economics; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.11729674502811405,"score_gpt":0.3816091467804168,"score_spread":0.26431240175230275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241599785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90598047,0.00036811194,0.08241443,0.000487152,0.000026901906,0.00020405679,0.00002414868,0.00003457279,0.01046011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98454463,0.00011096494,0.014589594,0.000040927003,0.000021173968,0.00007520639,0.000011480469,0.000014168242,0.0005919354],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893477,0.007521382,0.00033975803,0.00058134476,0.0013412795,0.00086848007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86749685,0.11449085,0.008616444,0.005320291,0.0023746106,0.0017009358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01669977,0.0008495925,0.0015722989,0.00082410866,0.0009396739,0.0037177627,0.002033967,0.0021651438,0.004586959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06747739,0.00091043377,0.001299797,0.0010504693,0.0028251493,0.0073125293,0.0024375257,0.002445766,0.00032970513],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00603845,0.0032664225,0.03786785,0.00080061675,0.0005809383,0.0015221301,0.0014818051,0.5830089,0.015527975,0.24367647,0.000821723,0.10540668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058283715,0.0047457,0.01095714,0.00007671576,0.0003822525,0.000786859,0.0009380768,0.8355166,0.0033506937,0.14093842,0.0016087663,0.00011601247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010390308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011773681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01669977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001532115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011615958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08831793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242946812","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aat116","title":"Social Networks and New Product Choice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Social connectedness; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Preference; Social network (sociolinguistics); Microeconomics; Marketing; Consumer choice; Economics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.013305521879268988,"score_gpt":0.21070941248873712,"score_spread":0.19740389060946814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242946812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812719,0.0005335054,0.005697797,0.00057873945,0.000011602573,0.000023803324,0.00014628326,0.000013849734,0.011722594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862313,0.00013432303,0.0005225115,0.000014238961,0.000011917163,0.000005601331,0.000029144738,0.000001859231,0.0006572617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918085,0.00045991247,0.000031821117,0.0001279208,0.00014426824,0.000055272794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960084,0.0063937004,0.002698126,0.00042690305,0.0004298584,0.00045055605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011586876,0.0001950384,0.00027302004,0.0012328827,0.0003612076,0.0011516294,0.00025837886,0.0004143874,0.005447257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076846615,0.00015352842,0.00024177758,0.001292405,0.00092500367,0.0010942082,0.00059152086,0.00042965324,0.00028843645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038127459,0.0003698292,0.8159167,0.00022288343,0.0006059562,0.0005653551,0.0029049872,0.047949977,0.0030154977,0.06025221,0.0016622924,0.066153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058207712,0.00025762184,0.76561004,0.00011578316,0.00020936989,0.00045351565,0.003938159,0.13479175,0.0014212597,0.07762874,0.015439261,0.000076383185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005923197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060420097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005923197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008142103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021424044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018222928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247786080","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00773.x","title":"Price Discrimination in the Context of Vertical Differentiation: An Application to Canadian Wheat Exports","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Massachusetts Amherst; University of Connecticut; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Product differentiation; Context (archaeology); Market power; Economics; Price discrimination; Exploit; Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.009527391453814154,"score_gpt":0.19560138348419495,"score_spread":0.1860739920303808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247786080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97639954,0.00084219745,0.0038778656,0.0020198296,0.00003390762,0.00006541502,0.00029572993,0.000040591476,0.016424997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634606,0.00039790448,0.0016481299,0.00009970444,0.000014968275,0.000008350222,0.00008856327,0.0000057170028,0.0013906269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918336,0.00021227964,0.000022274133,0.00012947543,0.00018854183,0.00026408047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958384,0.0025164115,0.0004482129,0.00017574581,0.00068957364,0.00033164007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022749568,0.0006288589,0.0007339463,0.0011909145,0.0028172226,0.0023805061,0.0011591221,0.0012875863,0.0032005585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010101252,0.00021925071,0.0010765411,0.0029321748,0.0024468086,0.0011591463,0.001543534,0.0015773509,0.00013457032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091292744,0.0007251332,0.4693667,0.0003449894,0.00045459956,0.0031002862,0.0051880623,0.16109076,0.00437929,0.24036665,0.011638174,0.10243234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003156592,0.00045792043,0.38725087,0.00014157331,0.0006126399,0.0006084439,0.009843648,0.5195017,0.0020724451,0.06176549,0.017021347,0.00040832593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9314615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9067592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06853849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022028526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010263074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1598289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276122769","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav022","title":"Measuring Price Elasticities of Demand and Supply of Water Entitlements Based on Stated and Revealed Preference Data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council; ACT Government","keywords":"Endogeneity; Price elasticity of demand; Economics; Entitlement (fair division); Revealed preference; Price elasticity of supply; Water supply; Elasticity (physics); Water use; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.14915253151360647,"score_gpt":0.20618192328086843,"score_spread":0.05702939176726196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276122769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97249866,0.00004002824,0.02349417,0.00008951466,0.0000066726266,0.00008082473,0.0015249351,0.000021920847,0.0022431305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942152,0.000027314982,0.0041541206,0.000018400671,0.000004361686,0.00005529177,0.0012208613,0.0000043289733,0.00030013156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539655,0.0023283237,0.00041501754,0.0005576164,0.0011099341,0.00019244383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96593004,0.021313483,0.0064345696,0.0043689604,0.0016448109,0.0003081651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005036842,0.0003908421,0.00040090884,0.0017010942,0.0002877937,0.0012227509,0.00078522955,0.00071218295,0.0026485086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035078418,0.00047022811,0.0010461559,0.0030393302,0.000635494,0.002417742,0.0010236157,0.0010816205,0.00047996014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007715072,0.0006472849,0.8552784,0.00022521678,0.0008859917,0.00028735338,0.00089589227,0.086922474,0.0036944393,0.013585005,0.0007351639,0.036071215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058767135,0.00064180954,0.6872646,0.000042656862,0.00014082936,0.00029589774,0.0010375212,0.28569427,0.0044457214,0.018565679,0.0016589457,0.00015321226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061630625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062968177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061630625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010586522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045986928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026637733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278882141","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav046","title":"The Impact of Perceptions in Averting‐decision Models: An Application of the Special Regressor Method to Drinking Water Choices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Valuation (finance); Revealed preference; Econometrics; Ordered probit; Probit model; Discrete choice; Contingent valuation; Multivariate probit model; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Perception; Risk perception; Empirical research; Bivariate analysis; Economics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0568962452854907,"score_gpt":0.27281115984220305,"score_spread":0.21591491455671236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278882141","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2505429,0.0007991231,0.7442076,0.00083249615,0.00009677328,0.00011208354,0.00013943754,0.00015580532,0.0031137478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283079,0.000956408,0.0668955,0.00015756297,0.0001388286,0.0001796579,0.00016930822,0.000052527226,0.0031422894],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.988519,0.009984396,0.00017086149,0.0005192342,0.00044421645,0.00036224475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90518534,0.08731498,0.0041382248,0.0018010385,0.0009500514,0.0006103629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016573783,0.0012020544,0.0017185246,0.0009919547,0.00043931016,0.0019563977,0.0017000231,0.0011212742,0.0035774969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045675598,0.0005769119,0.0024902888,0.0011979487,0.0020876592,0.0024292772,0.0021291745,0.002981067,0.00028447047],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005202035,0.00050110853,0.026461478,0.00021387808,0.0008090803,0.00047138942,0.0010035565,0.73608166,0.0007458659,0.19020319,0.0008490676,0.042139553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029147457,0.00013149326,0.0013687639,0.000014484544,0.00006971895,0.00002796995,0.0000626243,0.9588874,0.0001642945,0.038914897,0.00030139295,0.000027790744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009877113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051710736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016573783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001236611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009855382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08765161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285787321","doi":"","title":"Kaczan, David. \"Designing an Incentive Program to Reduce On-Farm Deforestation in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania.\" MSThesis, niversity of Alberta. Outstanding Master's Thesis Award","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Deforestation (computer science); Incentive; Geography; Archaeology; Environmental planning; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.020303958613954003,"score_gpt":0.23548794102627882,"score_spread":0.2151839824123248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285787321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05885065,0.044072058,0.014422712,0.72650975,0.027842375,0.0007786216,0.0035437588,0.00069584075,0.12328423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37424457,0.058808777,0.018590836,0.060053993,0.002210119,0.0006683398,0.0016318315,0.0002645065,0.48352692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957365,0.00013890203,0.00001809016,0.000026839394,0.0001555528,0.0000870446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970757,0.00075974007,0.00012153812,0.000028194218,0.0014531844,0.00056155206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023022878,0.00035997643,0.00020580362,0.0009328933,0.0021806215,0.0012339413,0.0008563778,0.0009860275,0.012033818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004382135,0.00020080706,0.00020709926,0.0008003551,0.00029760413,0.0009704636,0.0005847377,0.0019147779,0.0019048995],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013522417,0.00010908353,0.007670076,0.00023063338,0.00001622449,0.00018603895,0.001463242,0.0004242375,0.0005993904,0.004286746,0.8527995,0.1320797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015588907,0.00021459434,0.056039926,0.00054201856,0.00013811479,0.00013465622,0.0080549205,0.0013889604,0.0021601594,0.0049921433,0.92611194,0.000066642504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09672939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28789717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09672939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021844225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005194952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19233274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293649545","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaw041","title":"Agglomeration Effects in Ontario's Dairy Farming","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Inefficiency; Economies of agglomeration; Agriculture; Production (economics); Dairy farming; Agricultural economics; Heteroscedasticity; Economics; Agricultural science; Business; Function (biology); Economic geography; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.021912494572551438,"score_gpt":0.2765660719298119,"score_spread":0.25465357735726046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293649545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907706,0.00015956275,0.0012167011,0.00019639549,0.0000020822933,0.000018370509,0.00036592962,0.000010086725,0.0072601573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895704,0.00006400474,0.0001722131,0.000007634549,0.0000010480314,0.000004174297,0.0000681293,0.0000010915965,0.0007245935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993468,0.00013541804,0.000025555191,0.000091849004,0.00023901465,0.00016134982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820197,0.0007734163,0.00043615172,0.000098263794,0.00037506735,0.00011511101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006614049,0.00011726401,0.00035143242,0.0006709395,0.0008258963,0.0007769239,0.0002571035,0.00020035093,0.0025646335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026146874,0.00014374041,0.00027489985,0.0014310464,0.0008500589,0.00031982685,0.00070390035,0.00016178118,0.000100073354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026713518,0.00009473298,0.88598293,0.00013932431,0.00024401046,0.00063673063,0.0015377012,0.06825203,0.0027564361,0.016260207,0.0014196667,0.022409042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024208308,0.00003606302,0.9734807,0.000019959813,0.000057885987,0.000056906214,0.001547305,0.016783798,0.00044787105,0.0028652516,0.004664939,0.000015173592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7427828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8601179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25721723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008957761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035818869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51746404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334483474","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aav065","title":"Bayesian Estimation of Possibly Similar Yield Densities: Implications for Rating Crop Insurance Contracts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Crop insurance; Actuarial science; Sample (material); Insurance policy; Government (linguistics); Agriculture; Yield (engineering); Econometrics; Economics; Nonparametric statistics; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.020458691589797344,"score_gpt":0.23545780954805562,"score_spread":0.21499911795825827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334483474","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24942,0.0005718067,0.74432397,0.0011566157,0.000042913318,0.00031026156,0.00022343527,0.0002477684,0.0037031542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8153699,0.00022939779,0.18231493,0.00022735767,0.0000523944,0.00014912742,0.00040390782,0.00003425651,0.0012186874],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919486,0.0054127467,0.0002732231,0.0010560127,0.0010761763,0.00023309176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447233,0.046614204,0.002665713,0.0034098078,0.0020461783,0.0005408217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01793226,0.00069409877,0.0018690875,0.001053361,0.00085798197,0.0020748226,0.0023684935,0.0018670495,0.0020533164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09887901,0.0007613349,0.0012326045,0.0011546479,0.0014456896,0.0033607571,0.0018679544,0.002878173,0.00023943928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036925296,0.0003264618,0.027155487,0.00011991822,0.00029431313,0.00020110216,0.0006065282,0.7834091,0.0012215093,0.08173943,0.0017597476,0.10279702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003521024,0.00006753692,0.0031738968,0.000018180403,0.00001994616,0.000057931025,0.00006466347,0.96832657,0.00033509795,0.027407179,0.00047019255,0.000023576851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014546854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010595919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01793226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019004443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013292695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616455531","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aax027","title":"Spatial Patterns of Market Participation and Resource Extraction: Fuelwood Collection in Northern Uganda","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nickel Institute","funders":"International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Stock (firearms); Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.00785723590000881,"score_gpt":0.20056449201933385,"score_spread":0.19270725611932504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616455531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995889,0.000026941565,0.000070346956,0.000012957128,2.389268e-7,0.000003460621,0.000050937328,5.968452e-7,0.00024560431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997801,0.000016027125,0.00007235392,0.0000013833852,4.0009178e-7,0.000005795762,0.000031349107,3.9496211e-7,0.00009224874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991634,0.00040960062,0.000055026056,0.00014444125,0.00007275024,0.00015476612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961849,0.0013821023,0.0017424163,0.00021366822,0.0003026917,0.00017425822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082056096,0.00014173359,0.00025707064,0.0010344057,0.0006609629,0.0008739158,0.00046476827,0.00032529037,0.0025866923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005788122,0.0002316577,0.0001518722,0.0022892056,0.0012626643,0.0008927185,0.0016124018,0.00027168277,0.00020320441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014515375,0.00008101274,0.986078,0.00003952024,0.000037147292,0.0002314391,0.00527505,0.0007080855,0.00041255314,0.0004892371,0.00014648083,0.006356387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034004324,0.000045719542,0.988167,0.000016459207,0.000009152755,0.0001231285,0.009880429,0.0010449899,0.00013768108,0.00028290466,0.00028111995,0.000008083814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014916449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026616843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014916449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006993718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003212172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029659271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770269965","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aax070","title":"Ownership Restrictions and Farmland Values: Evidence from the 2003 Saskatchewan Farm Security Act Amendment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Land Values; Amendment; Agricultural economics; Business; Value (mathematics); Property value; Economics; Land use; Law; Political science; Finance; Real estate","score_opus":0.02588646503168158,"score_gpt":0.238053622863649,"score_spread":0.21216715783196743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770269965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797891,0.0006491817,0.00020882815,0.0021362742,0.000014774919,0.00003593575,0.0030268847,0.000008718882,0.014130479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993472,0.00097262376,0.00010366089,0.00046597156,0.000008050955,0.00002160331,0.0017951163,0.00000468166,0.003156276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979779,0.0004178881,0.000117317875,0.00018802562,0.0007700306,0.0005288539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785366,0.0070429062,0.0076366807,0.0012176887,0.004225876,0.0013402748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017634284,0.000267084,0.00032052005,0.0010182546,0.001585435,0.0024358355,0.0011708004,0.0007221317,0.003991738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009618037,0.000319276,0.00047671827,0.0046207327,0.0025574456,0.0010541329,0.0013844228,0.0015763202,0.0004383317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001450471,0.0001564079,0.97983783,0.000057237423,0.00016249182,0.00032133583,0.001180955,0.00218752,0.00021131456,0.0025375942,0.0040957523,0.009106561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015024423,0.00003653427,0.98873967,0.000060753126,0.00005419721,0.000027873892,0.004157256,0.0009638593,0.00022096766,0.00043080276,0.0052705347,0.000022483462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94569045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.977983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054309547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017171364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026051126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124587595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791907302","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aax093","title":"Redistributive Land Reform and Structural Change in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Economics; Land reform; Per capita income; Per capita; Agriculture; Economic reform; Development economics; Stimulus (psychology); Geography; Political science; China","score_opus":0.012650024142919568,"score_gpt":0.20950471010522403,"score_spread":0.19685468596230446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791907302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962591,0.00011662407,0.0000324099,0.00039361638,0.000002658066,0.000009670619,0.000026538173,0.0000011943881,0.0031583025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994522,0.000055889715,0.000017713817,0.00003320571,0.0000027667531,0.0000027600356,0.000028928473,3.8355404e-7,0.00040631232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996363,0.000064602566,0.000016498754,0.000027162756,0.000041106756,0.00021434613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859315,0.00012790164,0.0006537616,0.000040670384,0.00017907926,0.00040540018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057023007,0.00010599488,0.00017614922,0.0007832369,0.0007674975,0.0012528547,0.0002723459,0.00038274936,0.0024420202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014429422,0.00007906721,0.00016138199,0.001325023,0.0015451573,0.0009253329,0.0019516142,0.0004799073,0.000081323975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059246755,0.00060087367,0.91236347,0.00016195615,0.00014864415,0.0019321548,0.0112460395,0.0040356894,0.0037714972,0.03242917,0.0016167732,0.031101337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003946029,0.00013314738,0.9781991,0.000024580979,0.000030185736,0.000059572067,0.013506776,0.0011639654,0.00060676044,0.0015958261,0.004629944,0.000010703227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045776024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09539742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045776024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029601452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021535472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09101915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802030834","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aay003","title":"Measuring Potential Rents in the North Sea Herring Fishery","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Fishery; Economics; Herring; Stock (firearms); Population; Fish stock; Fishing; Marginal cost; Order (exchange); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Microeconomics; Geography; Biology; Finance","score_opus":0.014130171219358462,"score_gpt":0.1973638030857647,"score_spread":0.18323363186640623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802030834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99480635,0.000057196525,0.0013075029,0.000056745408,0.0000028568547,0.000011970134,0.00015097082,0.000008271055,0.0035982656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990847,0.000021929147,0.00041279144,0.000003685108,9.582909e-7,0.0000028066577,0.000052129948,0.0000013445266,0.0004195686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996649,0.00009821036,0.000020328003,0.000039358783,0.00012169962,0.00005545373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989505,0.00046527552,0.00022675966,0.000072464776,0.00016258415,0.0001225161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086741755,0.00020984729,0.0002972293,0.00045123431,0.0003105489,0.0007847071,0.00032159442,0.00031741892,0.0021387606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033755247,0.00017055048,0.00032839418,0.00032104054,0.00044578427,0.0010340381,0.0007797728,0.00026288768,0.00016745638],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057038694,0.00015445412,0.6644086,0.000100782214,0.00018263682,0.0004171405,0.0003674621,0.29458487,0.005049391,0.013826406,0.00064515654,0.01969277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021064538,0.0005366616,0.60545576,0.000041357296,0.00006580299,0.00021649803,0.0011164851,0.38073182,0.0019477948,0.008280469,0.0015085809,0.00007769002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026731202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035700485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026731202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024164957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067164615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05315119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806990741","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aay023","title":"A Century of U.S. Farm Productivity Growth: A Surge Then a Slowdown","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service; Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics; Agricultural Research Service; University of Wyoming; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Productivity; Slowdown; Agricultural economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Total factor productivity; Agricultural productivity; Agriculture; Population growth; Multifactor productivity; Population; Geography; Demography; Macroeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.009300838694216407,"score_gpt":0.17895902242271555,"score_spread":0.16965818372849914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806990741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8881564,0.015248483,0.0022343956,0.05767415,0.0007478926,0.000013095695,0.00795314,0.00019318031,0.027779227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735064,0.0055187833,0.00088857685,0.002533212,0.00040773192,0.000006480487,0.0017430597,0.000032547287,0.001518879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997768,0.00002421784,0.000018999885,0.000058518795,0.00008312352,0.000038519393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836034,0.00022207435,0.0005464636,0.00012448644,0.00056103396,0.00018559166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006924351,0.0001971275,0.00017670335,0.00095107016,0.0006105769,0.0018867503,0.00017518726,0.00054094376,0.0028881498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025995355,0.00012186578,0.00016072472,0.0027372455,0.0005701953,0.0017448581,0.0009441246,0.0013457995,0.0005346108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003343829,0.00008986868,0.58822334,0.00039541034,0.00015805224,0.0005786509,0.0026128846,0.0020407753,0.0049134954,0.025975814,0.110773705,0.26390368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009764243,0.00007963801,0.8667592,0.00032408827,0.000041229967,0.0002658768,0.0026777755,0.0014362443,0.0014513974,0.0068447674,0.120079294,0.000030791274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020881528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024360238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020881528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011224572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012734436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883505815","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaz001","title":"Price Discovery in Agricultural Futures Markets: Should We Look beyond the Best Bid‐Ask Spread?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Lakehead University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Price discovery; Futures contract; Ask price; Asset (computer security); Order (exchange); Financial economics; Economics; Business; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.010139592557894376,"score_gpt":0.20027010132404247,"score_spread":0.1901305087661481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883505815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9392533,0.0024450107,0.036430717,0.008777633,0.00007744372,0.000055732125,0.00050183316,0.00016231996,0.012295999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470127,0.0004634181,0.0033918559,0.00020221794,0.00009419249,0.0000078082085,0.0001463906,0.000016725196,0.0009762882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724424,0.0009513042,0.00017748187,0.00038573483,0.0009878508,0.0002533795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9102328,0.06801865,0.012664705,0.00406446,0.0034066376,0.0016127782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069855927,0.00045321768,0.00090417487,0.0022241084,0.000764669,0.0044076894,0.001222967,0.0014364783,0.003965516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08131257,0.0005146396,0.00071481575,0.0024962302,0.0023451955,0.013413204,0.0017691549,0.0027094085,0.00044574222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013677173,0.0005543554,0.5918479,0.0003140471,0.00044527522,0.0017746217,0.004003333,0.0859366,0.0042537176,0.12355801,0.004507823,0.18143657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015466692,0.0004118418,0.2373821,0.00019935776,0.00030925524,0.0009940421,0.003812754,0.38159227,0.008116693,0.3547713,0.011974261,0.00028149446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006803645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004354608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069855927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012642527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013055346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036943793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884086991","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aay050","title":"Money Matters: The Role of Yields and Profits in Agricultural Technology Adoption","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Economics; Agriculture; Panel data; Public economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.008405854834510432,"score_gpt":0.2038473044602368,"score_spread":0.19544144962572638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884086991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961287,0.00022463885,0.00084950204,0.0003758618,0.000006147815,0.000012839495,0.000100938836,0.0000051056786,0.0022961681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999275,0.0000697174,0.00007271543,0.000019521563,0.000006974343,0.0000026676948,0.000031266733,0.0000014283363,0.0005206262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888736,0.00046450994,0.000069246606,0.00016908572,0.00014900374,0.0002607967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95879567,0.029112183,0.009213615,0.0008313743,0.0007370944,0.0013099975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026204586,0.00025405778,0.0004187985,0.00058686524,0.0005383462,0.002119713,0.00042520833,0.00095341366,0.005697473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018451717,0.000206593,0.0003878819,0.00088885246,0.0011487457,0.0018955168,0.0008710161,0.0011995564,0.00041641828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005079457,0.0003729048,0.9563044,0.000066021465,0.00019158387,0.00071065547,0.0005749668,0.018082185,0.0017792821,0.0066013723,0.00040947378,0.0143991485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023731807,0.00031327826,0.9723874,0.000040181112,0.00014542846,0.00016085633,0.0013670897,0.016583517,0.0013500723,0.0065084933,0.0010855759,0.00003434697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004948331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046687927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005697473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009868433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006292381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019059896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901707827","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aay076","title":"Spatial Renewable Resource Extraction under Possible Regime Shift","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists; University of California, Santa Barbara; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; University of Alberta","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Renewable energy; Extraction (chemistry); Computer science; Renewable resource; Natural resource economics; Engineering; Computer network; Electrical engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.004233057124632696,"score_gpt":0.19777078142415971,"score_spread":0.193537724299527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901707827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94660467,0.0001148062,0.03226084,0.0018529508,0.000032190965,0.000027757545,0.00017232087,0.00004931485,0.018885165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989833,0.000027569196,0.00035151196,0.000031793476,0.000004882788,0.0000049362807,0.000008796036,0.0000019772567,0.0005850465],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995553,0.0001369781,0.000020114296,0.000086591856,0.000042712763,0.00015837091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806327,0.00071171013,0.0007305548,0.00019640334,0.00009970071,0.00019835569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010977037,0.00020414319,0.0004936718,0.00025344957,0.00039956186,0.0013652516,0.00049045566,0.001226598,0.0042028567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004752353,0.00021584978,0.0005633445,0.00021721031,0.0014482029,0.0014959773,0.001208167,0.0007105407,0.00021056781],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031556585,0.00014390316,0.032436747,0.00013173046,0.00015936285,0.0014041866,0.00029531782,0.57351,0.010548082,0.36858556,0.002035183,0.01043445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006693331,0.0002829653,0.0179848,0.00003767804,0.000056655048,0.00032869529,0.0009502592,0.638099,0.0013251633,0.33807614,0.002730999,0.000060692444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020469334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001731205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042028567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009787855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035796026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014059901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903214105","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12403","title":"Rainfall shocks and risk aversion: Evidence from Southeast Asia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Poverty; Loss aversion; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010725761999020884,"score_gpt":0.19636305770195156,"score_spread":0.18563729570293067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903214105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99903905,0.00008983109,0.00008616212,0.00006028145,0.0000011966112,0.000001295097,0.000090415706,0.000001142762,0.00063061976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996687,0.00014184056,0.000026572225,0.0000149055395,0.0000024882563,9.3763845e-7,0.00006916384,6.103692e-7,0.0000748022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998274,0.00007553428,0.0000158876,0.000029433322,0.000025756217,0.000025986412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952236,0.0018717456,0.002029076,0.00033296522,0.00027903396,0.00026364118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008323963,0.00015838986,0.00023291101,0.0005097905,0.00023087492,0.0006078274,0.00020927381,0.0002482592,0.0019695407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023956092,0.00013179744,0.00021738518,0.0012427346,0.0005596651,0.0003317872,0.00055853475,0.00039353545,0.00013977115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012645888,0.0000624731,0.99129313,0.000030392126,0.00010863596,0.0002218195,0.0020908972,0.0003241706,0.00037870803,0.0002605691,0.00012937507,0.0049732877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004337445,0.000051339754,0.9972121,0.000021143807,0.00003380998,0.00008932711,0.0014142912,0.00046789044,0.00016514331,0.00025434335,0.00028107798,0.0000052895775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012662201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009585172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012662201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018946921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015704524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025177002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921479879","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaz004","title":"On the Treatment of Heteroscedasticity in Crop Yield Data","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Econometrics; Volatility (finance); Economics; Crop insurance; Yield (engineering); Generalization; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Asymmetry; Statistics; Mathematics; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.024757425066222437,"score_gpt":0.21757797970300455,"score_spread":0.1928205546367821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921479879","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11253188,0.0017358502,0.875368,0.00442512,0.00027922526,0.0003369195,0.0006758267,0.00041767576,0.004229528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9058139,0.00092176406,0.08924089,0.0011949942,0.00041914367,0.00032108297,0.00066036027,0.00011045445,0.0013174806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9379291,0.046926074,0.0029376252,0.0055138837,0.0055924715,0.001100909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64485204,0.29669887,0.02126995,0.030845204,0.005517637,0.00081628904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081508115,0.0008047244,0.0016875048,0.0023743708,0.0013160212,0.0028599848,0.0023136332,0.0021133197,0.002652526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2124908,0.0007226618,0.0020806934,0.0045363167,0.0049748197,0.0038959326,0.0023675459,0.0045896024,0.00039936553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055706705,0.00028377058,0.19866987,0.0007444514,0.0034171587,0.0017183817,0.002118952,0.12232492,0.0033942836,0.42299712,0.007554936,0.23621905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014758189,0.00046922994,0.104684114,0.0006458832,0.0005095126,0.0004969289,0.0009773847,0.46280524,0.0056158747,0.41363266,0.0097738765,0.00024167617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066618123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006476713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081508115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030865564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031220645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43106127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971521315","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaz044","title":"Productivity Spillovers From Pollution Reduction: Reducing Coal Use Increases Crop Yields","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Crop; Economics; Productivity; Yield (engineering); Agricultural economics; Coal; Range (aeronautics); Shock (circulatory); Pollution; Agronomy; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03178401909374369,"score_gpt":0.1864191163624197,"score_spread":0.15463509726867603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971521315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813275,0.00040196025,0.0041943477,0.001033382,0.000016093933,0.00005104837,0.0012617081,0.000083296785,0.011630655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980052,0.0002866082,0.00038755024,0.00008093205,0.000015834192,0.00001130995,0.0002972457,0.0000024369797,0.00091286097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999796,0.000052080224,0.000009086812,0.00004292226,0.00004023807,0.000059679238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922764,0.0003224257,0.00028903567,0.00004301552,0.00006328657,0.000054714415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037562277,0.0003528777,0.00021003043,0.00054741744,0.000171095,0.0006147253,0.00028233728,0.0005018146,0.004170591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015919032,0.00015517978,0.0007577177,0.0005204706,0.00037227178,0.00046241202,0.00068203313,0.00049417134,0.00030277012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006034721,0.0009179877,0.5335789,0.00060060853,0.0011389203,0.0012808583,0.00041833357,0.3589023,0.015700134,0.018321672,0.006402298,0.062134568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018793711,0.0008628535,0.8479389,0.00011682954,0.0008844918,0.00027959797,0.0008806231,0.113348745,0.010652482,0.014992996,0.009803054,0.000051437586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015810065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012457758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015810065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009337229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004602857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031436086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987943169","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12533","title":"Assessing the impacts of equivalency agreements in international organic trade","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"International trade; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.02730241877829335,"score_gpt":0.25156708073567147,"score_spread":0.22426466195737813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987943169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880982,0.00022292415,0.0033112892,0.00026426485,0.0000126835275,0.00004842814,0.0005050151,0.000019601028,0.0075175483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986864,0.00010030061,0.0004397351,0.00003460153,0.0000051198185,0.000015491803,0.00024559698,0.0000023836426,0.00047042716],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862313,0.0005835372,0.0000650409,0.00018335355,0.00027332292,0.00027164756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418527,0.0036340521,0.0012663263,0.00021326229,0.00041499033,0.0002860124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033212297,0.00038267806,0.0003984261,0.0011457021,0.00043373817,0.00210341,0.0006722417,0.00081493374,0.0043398696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009060148,0.00022240002,0.00088263326,0.0015657725,0.0008593889,0.0024104512,0.0016918153,0.0012201815,0.0002652174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003022343,0.00032504002,0.3797597,0.000113677765,0.00029697025,0.00046116574,0.00016904726,0.5868083,0.00057746965,0.015320787,0.0010392332,0.014826327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111611575,0.0010635513,0.28016278,0.00008391007,0.00027743838,0.00017673543,0.0028634253,0.6878645,0.0011819231,0.019529771,0.0066075833,0.00007682922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036885343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024063343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036885343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030168793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015046928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07334131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002037937","doi":"10.1002/ajae.12078","title":"The Power of Stories: Narratives and Information Framing Effects in Science Communication","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Framing (construction); Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Multinomial logistic regression; Science communication; Framing effect; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Social science; History; Mathematics education; Science education","score_opus":0.06002072855429433,"score_gpt":0.3306134997032663,"score_spread":0.27059277114897196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002037937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97382337,0.00074390305,0.0025899464,0.0013471616,0.00005884418,0.0001467161,0.00007787206,0.000019965275,0.021192295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969308,0.00040836202,0.0017465835,0.00019953326,0.000039671042,0.000102307655,0.000050357474,0.000017842269,0.00050459267],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736202,0.01967825,0.0010439657,0.0011722838,0.003643746,0.00084163056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6483934,0.3186087,0.023001749,0.0042935624,0.003332023,0.0023705424],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021007469,0.0007548634,0.0004194001,0.0019419045,0.0024570613,0.0051918305,0.00092072453,0.001472207,0.0056965738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.172619,0.0006357903,0.0006628193,0.001104837,0.0051326915,0.008457415,0.0043095755,0.0025078943,0.00031769168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067347437,0.0021903468,0.20784459,0.0025656293,0.00071084406,0.0010400619,0.5611445,0.0018213746,0.011182245,0.039454132,0.0017946792,0.16351685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002196925,0.005330548,0.43367198,0.0037905886,0.0028115746,0.0014449286,0.42958358,0.0105768405,0.013441605,0.05231308,0.044257436,0.00058097026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004571368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035635433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002371289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016134137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11109942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006153018","doi":"10.1002/ajae.12028","title":"A Bayesian State‐Space Approach for Invasive Species Management: The Case of Spotted Wing Drosophila","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Insect behavior and control techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Integrated pest management; Population; Bayesian inference; Bayesian probability; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.01580334303634147,"score_gpt":0.19801942587623816,"score_spread":0.1822160828398967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006153018","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036224898,0.0009656916,0.95258194,0.0017812522,0.000071273746,0.000102215425,0.00030645027,0.00015359579,0.007812653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79014975,0.0016886797,0.19673564,0.00036484055,0.0002437049,0.00044569923,0.0005081945,0.00008042952,0.009783101],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855715,0.00088012614,0.00004660749,0.00020457663,0.00018845925,0.00012301591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921936,0.006390559,0.000511782,0.000180755,0.00052386307,0.00019942528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043568644,0.0009974679,0.0015215056,0.0016502371,0.0010131578,0.0019859087,0.0022136108,0.0026234302,0.0057010073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013333276,0.00089056994,0.0017464228,0.0011839016,0.0016267954,0.0027150037,0.0016188634,0.0027932806,0.0004533127],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003759006,0.000056244546,0.0011765808,0.00004138556,0.00005466688,0.00011963027,0.00008755836,0.91332936,0.00023251568,0.0762186,0.00068219943,0.007963666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009181308,0.000010732635,0.00015993157,0.0000075023036,0.000011355624,0.000011157971,0.000013622564,0.97846687,0.000030501737,0.020892497,0.00037431828,0.000012245639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032358408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029242894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032358408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022656843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021768224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064340115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006393797","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaz015","title":"The Role of Weather on Schooling and Work of Young Adults in Madagascar","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Department for International Development; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada","keywords":"Work (physics); Geography; Meteorology; Climatology; Engineering; Geology","score_opus":0.0023211841901904463,"score_gpt":0.16187096684417587,"score_spread":0.15954978265398542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006393797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992698,0.00006718011,0.000016752076,0.00008319412,0.0000017617839,0.000002484459,0.0002643268,0.0000010243264,0.00029336574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965036,0.000057286838,0.0000131876,0.000011726074,0.0000023599146,0.0000024593865,0.00013008957,3.503317e-7,0.00013215835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998375,0.000040890656,0.000011500842,0.000023223014,0.000019178284,0.00006765593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912053,0.0001842978,0.0003860438,0.000032268163,0.000042234627,0.0002346045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028857478,0.00015243555,0.00017564438,0.00049558224,0.00046952802,0.00067438715,0.00027943065,0.00028387093,0.00285814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011739385,0.00015088072,0.00025654936,0.00066251715,0.00029849412,0.00027321375,0.0007167803,0.00041217858,0.00019954602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013197303,0.000025332816,0.99818254,0.0000060375405,0.00001836785,0.00007218383,0.00041867833,0.00010165639,0.00007829027,0.000036384925,0.00008273455,0.00096464175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.9965436e-7,0.000016379012,0.9989415,0.0000056257927,0.00000476326,0.0000138992145,0.0007169435,0.00015568586,0.000013637725,0.00001206643,0.000117374824,0.0000014260755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098468564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13527061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098468564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050939096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039576585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19579083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016097975","doi":"10.1002/ajae.12084","title":"The Effects of Untying International Food Assistance: The Case of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Margin (machine learning); Commodity; Business; International trade; Economics; International economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0052998360170917694,"score_gpt":0.20765834860044055,"score_spread":0.20235851258334878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016097975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706138,0.001021065,0.00029881726,0.006576902,0.000031318927,0.000040789582,0.0018202555,0.00002456629,0.019572455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957659,0.000557499,0.00019776932,0.00042544122,0.0000074341483,0.0000126864015,0.00040663386,0.000009781979,0.0026167554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596393,0.0007907073,0.000074934054,0.00026296216,0.000677183,0.0022301988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050176,0.0025801829,0.0012090635,0.00049693673,0.002848977,0.0023630317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026140756,0.0004227778,0.00070476456,0.0015980622,0.008489047,0.0033666159,0.0017369732,0.0011432747,0.0036058037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124902455,0.00023771549,0.0007402869,0.005066967,0.003467377,0.0010595663,0.0025740555,0.0023293532,0.00015036654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011049431,0.0005693486,0.783208,0.0002680311,0.00073750457,0.0032497651,0.016194083,0.046601214,0.0011833785,0.056416195,0.03403152,0.05643604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017846194,0.00018089513,0.8655656,0.00029663785,0.000653302,0.00032127285,0.06333153,0.020233905,0.0012175823,0.0056461147,0.042108204,0.00026645456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99812835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09797747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09797747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09033879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71087956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019437960","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12097","title":"“The Effects of Untying International Food Assistance: The Case of Canada” — Authors' Response to Comment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pascal (unit); Citation; Library science; Operations research; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04085094499644265,"score_gpt":0.3485229030778843,"score_spread":0.30767195808144165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019437960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083283667,0.0004944079,0.000022285685,0.99272436,0.0044224705,0.000007379435,0.00010182887,0.000007688114,0.0013867486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006797549,0.00053337985,0.00004594386,0.985218,0.0034153275,0.00002309863,0.000029378729,0.000026028658,0.0039113187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903058,0.0014554737,0.0007268335,0.0012180804,0.0027898722,0.0035039557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95935524,0.019699445,0.002477092,0.00072277203,0.012339921,0.005405566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008843275,0.00095620047,0.0015926765,0.0012667008,0.019531636,0.011866437,0.010429169,0.11119577,0.011169971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05549859,0.001380245,0.0022513096,0.0031186412,0.012677167,0.00641931,0.005670989,0.06278006,0.0023521495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044981516,0.000012161323,0.0009611132,0.000058405312,0.000030688658,0.0005160374,0.0016477855,0.00010188612,0.000068342204,0.0035076675,0.9918333,0.0012176422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011806032,0.000029432133,0.008710214,0.00078584667,0.00016900992,0.0004129739,0.025976047,0.00045702845,0.0005961514,0.005690315,0.95663816,0.00041676775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82343894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85139877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17656106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03435755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0815259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35520166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123421005","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aaw059","title":"The Financialization of Food?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Economics; Speculation; Vector autoregression; Equity (law); Futures contract; Monetary economics; Recession; Business cycle; Financial economics; Financial market; Finance; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.009414365195107804,"score_gpt":0.1797484254297778,"score_spread":0.17033406023467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123421005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8934404,0.0058602355,0.0013963219,0.043049682,0.00023988176,0.00001011159,0.0006516457,0.0000273726,0.055324316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958646,0.0014115387,0.00010413822,0.0005107676,0.00009200794,0.0000028218699,0.000095745134,0.0000037593459,0.0019144928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999105,0.000020004289,0.000003281717,0.000018906601,0.00001339715,0.00003392566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930346,0.0001198894,0.00036713385,0.000034770892,0.00008797551,0.000086696455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045943903,0.00008149003,0.000106283136,0.00040534497,0.00024112701,0.0017433647,0.00011213279,0.00043968906,0.004971068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031024667,0.0000751638,0.000093101175,0.0005686488,0.0008211436,0.002158309,0.00041691915,0.00067903963,0.00027114918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005329185,0.00019820766,0.43887368,0.00020005171,0.00013336782,0.0007638432,0.0034649225,0.0034417098,0.0025454604,0.2609963,0.030657843,0.2581917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023182602,0.000113195725,0.7833829,0.00026390664,0.00003517834,0.0004391721,0.004733553,0.004530883,0.00084708276,0.10321794,0.102377005,0.00003599993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006627754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005058875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006627754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009898221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005802662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016629815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123481223","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8276.2004.tb18455.x","title":"Inserting GM Products into the Food Chain: The Market and Welfare Effects of Different Labeling and Regulatory Regimes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Business; Food chain; Economics; Market economy; Biology","score_opus":0.006257221565785301,"score_gpt":0.17852644327778028,"score_spread":0.172269221711995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123481223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9448025,0.0018871357,0.0075544417,0.005469985,0.00009229169,0.00010900275,0.00023516567,0.000033276505,0.039816104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995479,0.00069681247,0.0011375726,0.0008803575,0.00006283114,0.000047545356,0.0000437072,0.000010112281,0.0016421376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951083,0.0030183506,0.00009228047,0.0003909356,0.00069177034,0.00069829624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97301584,0.020355139,0.0039265165,0.0009452415,0.0013945238,0.00036270797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007513674,0.00048491426,0.00057670707,0.0008974462,0.0011228529,0.0033596265,0.0008251722,0.0030117892,0.0071101226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012596959,0.00031720562,0.0011518147,0.00076201936,0.0055526574,0.0035875805,0.002241591,0.0018251592,0.00034259463],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017004238,0.005589008,0.10228511,0.0013158491,0.001889885,0.0018020078,0.0025979977,0.08198367,0.08528378,0.4893559,0.0047302833,0.20616226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017363233,0.013926593,0.3116963,0.00055400253,0.0024028723,0.0005886419,0.010204039,0.04621106,0.055761702,0.52948946,0.027048193,0.00038073128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021504713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027767534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007513674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028616781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010049356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03973657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133547594","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12195","title":"The Transition from Small to Large Farms in Developing Economies: A Welfare Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Purdue Pharma (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Inefficiency; Agriculture; Commodity; Poverty; Food security; Pareto principle; Consolidation (business); Production (economics); General equilibrium theory; Agricultural economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.014544149596990814,"score_gpt":0.21582635984959125,"score_spread":0.20128221025260043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133547594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94358844,0.00024897535,0.03281092,0.0010854705,0.000006732144,0.00008383776,0.00037172262,0.00003328211,0.021770539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606377,0.00036068476,0.0017952294,0.00006674454,0.0000027883336,0.00005830491,0.00007035558,0.0000052430696,0.0015768848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983037,0.00007159597,0.000003989599,0.000018691824,0.0000119056995,0.000063422835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996611,0.00019665022,0.000054222328,0.000020775267,0.000025686883,0.000041502237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006943538,0.0002943374,0.0003087166,0.00056615454,0.00087980565,0.0012732471,0.00034243835,0.0005404411,0.006229402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001460959,0.00017956975,0.00056817045,0.0007557624,0.0012094427,0.0016614241,0.0010622921,0.0006494231,0.00021321846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036155924,0.00053544895,0.047822665,0.00015168833,0.00013543689,0.0009437163,0.0011611358,0.40356106,0.0058023417,0.4764845,0.0040731276,0.05896729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018212062,0.00046512918,0.04849755,0.0001745416,0.00018504984,0.00041827167,0.0046615633,0.53513974,0.0020773713,0.3983995,0.0097423745,0.000056748537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064407014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00476801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064407014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002176549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000897121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020839393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135223423","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12203","title":"Hog Barns and Neighboring House Prices: Anticipation and Post‐Establishment Impacts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Barn; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Livestock; Agricultural economics; Hedonic pricing; Economics; Geography; Agricultural science; Environmental science; Econometrics; Forestry","score_opus":0.00844975472662563,"score_gpt":0.19966524734603017,"score_spread":0.19121549261940454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135223423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99634475,0.000089579,0.0003696586,0.00024640534,0.0000053058434,0.000006646444,0.0003648728,0.000005103894,0.0025676307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896955,0.000050453236,0.00005985696,0.000014556078,0.0000026747296,0.0000012527862,0.00017675309,0.000001905909,0.00072315155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960357,0.000069134396,0.000011655876,0.00007222402,0.00009275287,0.00015071208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796224,0.0006223947,0.0007288898,0.00007738337,0.00032513685,0.00028392798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005278423,0.00016683577,0.00018091834,0.00031114873,0.00039426336,0.0012697049,0.00054062984,0.000384428,0.0036080317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029501168,0.00019596577,0.00030950288,0.0006301894,0.00065409945,0.0006628964,0.00058865955,0.00076786586,0.00021623539],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011353101,0.0000743094,0.9860888,0.000012535156,0.00006485134,0.00023069196,0.0003679591,0.0063430644,0.0006540163,0.00096189143,0.00045532506,0.004633194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002353298,0.000039963987,0.99292904,0.0000049897444,0.000013770032,0.000022362161,0.0011184927,0.0049047414,0.00021444891,0.00021347315,0.000529303,0.0000071201357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6354049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7851552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6354049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044169794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022808479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73348457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206314104","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12268","title":"Using inferred valuation to quantify survey and social desirability bias in stated preference research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Preference; Social desirability bias; Social desirability; Contingent valuation; General Social Survey; Survey data collection; Referent; Social preferences; Valuation (finance); Survey instrument; Survey research; Reporting bias; Social psychology; Psychology; Willingness to pay; Economics; Statistics; Political science; Microeconomics; MEDLINE; Applied psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6932762573644689,"score_gpt":0.3655499014428434,"score_spread":0.32772635592162547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206314104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6574003,0.00076632446,0.32357943,0.0013407401,0.00011947881,0.0005108637,0.0006372765,0.00006262209,0.015582908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773483,0.000085782354,0.021648977,0.0001341486,0.000025841982,0.00029394566,0.0001401893,0.000009040004,0.00031370283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8376909,0.14421044,0.004615052,0.0032923757,0.009330681,0.00086060987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38173452,0.52612853,0.04505261,0.031461254,0.014681023,0.00094204757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12723173,0.0007812432,0.00084273913,0.0031788491,0.0008491372,0.0030965393,0.0014582229,0.0015154782,0.0037770225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43871608,0.00042420553,0.0012021919,0.0041327607,0.003104758,0.004703557,0.002849576,0.0021213968,0.00035286995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014986998,0.0008493519,0.614047,0.0013499816,0.0019423938,0.00025787097,0.010031993,0.03500482,0.00226902,0.16719879,0.0017331719,0.16381684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025639086,0.0021422168,0.28435627,0.0013880784,0.000810484,0.0006166666,0.007167372,0.2408658,0.008998059,0.44485706,0.008219553,0.00032213412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016410524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013726334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8727683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020766647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009418547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67287374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209462045","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12272","title":"Curvature and competitiveness: Carbon taxes in cattle markets","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Carbon tax; Marginal abatement cost; Monetary economics; Counterfactual thinking; Market power; Liberian dollar; Revenue; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Greenhouse gas","score_opus":0.019764030395095004,"score_gpt":0.20677361551971268,"score_spread":0.18700958512461768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209462045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962433,0.0002512885,0.017896377,0.0006874108,0.0000110478395,0.000030573556,0.00010633265,0.00004601265,0.018538058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991678,0.000034615638,0.0003085582,0.000017607434,0.000003595194,0.000001927309,0.000011854872,0.0000029624239,0.000451224],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993999,0.00031228666,0.000017584855,0.000064214735,0.0001027301,0.00010324328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720347,0.0013202605,0.00086978736,0.0002055875,0.0002552234,0.00014570066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012173274,0.00018469314,0.00041457568,0.0006504364,0.00034502894,0.0022231042,0.00038002906,0.0006102276,0.006532763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005809556,0.0001887397,0.0005138382,0.0007747341,0.0017248163,0.0016258275,0.0011002524,0.00083281443,0.00020016152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005118099,0.000195704,0.08449046,0.000106933934,0.00020565854,0.00034061034,0.0002504206,0.55516726,0.0051520853,0.33205938,0.0010489951,0.020470697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013423737,0.00041404332,0.08930598,0.00004513174,0.00014972404,0.00021230872,0.00084245054,0.5569398,0.0043856255,0.3410683,0.0064095636,0.00009292022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005437106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034579623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006532763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002059604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006786288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021854281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214144221","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12274","title":"A bird's eye view of farm size and biodiversity: The ecological legacy of the iron curtain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesamt für Naturschutz; European Commission; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biodiversity; Agriculture; Geography; German; Leverage (statistics); Wildlife; Diversity (politics); Land cover; Land use; Agroforestry; Agricultural biodiversity; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.004888151012499762,"score_gpt":0.18881072947763672,"score_spread":0.18392257846513696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214144221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929658,0.00009297017,0.00015252568,0.00029888924,0.0000058910173,0.00000190841,0.00008637242,0.000002082023,0.0063935695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994054,0.00002239817,0.000046466423,0.000041174622,0.0000039895535,7.562295e-7,0.00001697556,9.3490064e-7,0.0004618645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998721,0.00005032848,0.0000023540267,0.000027321632,0.000024952185,0.000022951874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987225,0.0004801192,0.0003491909,0.00009899621,0.00012898889,0.00022019813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047735445,0.00010289714,0.00014726554,0.0003985349,0.00041955468,0.00070242205,0.00018146705,0.00025636327,0.003590285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010277922,0.00007328775,0.00011534993,0.00021949876,0.0009482332,0.0005273251,0.000353803,0.00027682775,0.00012201206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027837275,0.00015308407,0.97883224,0.000026162534,0.00009390561,0.00023894625,0.001588612,0.00078037503,0.004131863,0.002325002,0.0015626663,0.009988753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023625723,0.000055816483,0.99727577,0.0000043801106,0.000011101094,0.000019604211,0.0012599395,0.0002762048,0.000120134806,0.00044527635,0.0005260377,0.0000032812297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029233534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06265172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029233534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005509791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018462501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058126748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206180622","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12285","title":"Staying afloat: The effect of algae contamination on <scp>Lake Erie</scp> housing prices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Algal bloom; Water quality; Algae; Surface runoff; Nutrient; Eutrophication; Oceanography; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Phytoplankton; Biology; Geology","score_opus":0.007781785738602396,"score_gpt":0.18407429699560474,"score_spread":0.17629251125700235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206180622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961546,0.0000834009,0.00027736477,0.0007207845,0.00000754829,0.0000061383844,0.00072337576,0.000011484177,0.0020153464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981476,0.000030420762,0.00006842499,0.000054785323,0.000005686174,0.000003975408,0.0004581717,0.0000035912115,0.0012272875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995297,0.00015080848,0.000024729146,0.000092514914,0.000072927265,0.00012929803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969934,0.0008265206,0.0012795184,0.00014479048,0.00038251345,0.00037321664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000581569,0.00017215264,0.00027335604,0.00028771962,0.00040893408,0.0015741197,0.00052820495,0.00059554726,0.004557792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037202344,0.0001594407,0.0006287154,0.00053790124,0.0005041252,0.00066274416,0.0009275152,0.00085774536,0.00035846073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037722164,0.00019379356,0.9794306,0.000028396096,0.00036227162,0.00041243996,0.00031500167,0.006236136,0.0008096809,0.0016220396,0.003907807,0.006304542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001772778,0.00010128095,0.98804116,0.000009952087,0.00009742927,0.000038390837,0.0011056641,0.008032376,0.000362071,0.00032632184,0.001853214,0.000014328737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16151652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20033303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16151652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001640822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006518942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32115275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226142253","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12321","title":"On export duration puzzles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Destinations; Duration (music); Economics; Fixed cost; Production (economics); Convexity; Econometrics; Monetary economics; International economics; Microeconomics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.023346497353108276,"score_gpt":0.1822633613666921,"score_spread":0.15891686401358382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226142253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82751334,0.016679266,0.058337867,0.033698875,0.00035058951,0.0000734404,0.0016825311,0.00022232585,0.06144179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898093,0.0026236887,0.0014726307,0.0008237808,0.0005038347,0.000031476393,0.00042549788,0.000053914024,0.0042558312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992072,0.00032201564,0.0000648099,0.00013526324,0.00015402312,0.000116755975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584034,0.026618436,0.010133903,0.0025564793,0.0012009336,0.0010868798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004198899,0.00042359572,0.00091921334,0.0021145218,0.0010364071,0.0024349564,0.0012266162,0.0021541652,0.016124321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037873615,0.00024138764,0.00082735706,0.002626911,0.0021200296,0.004872284,0.0025363283,0.002578887,0.00074373157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006847388,0.00025592517,0.09871704,0.00052910164,0.00018404519,0.0017301948,0.0031404102,0.051937215,0.0013104262,0.72774464,0.023180738,0.09058547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001782827,0.00018558918,0.04402458,0.00040202343,0.000085213,0.0010405771,0.0017130417,0.06509074,0.00049511075,0.8564041,0.030278401,0.000102240105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021763989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010663368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016124321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011631597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045609567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05394119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252331563","doi":"10.1093/ajae/aas115","title":"Kaczan, David. “Designing an Incentive Program to Reduce On‐Farm Deforestation in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania.” MS Thesis, University of Alberta. Outstanding Master's Thesis Award","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Deforestation (computer science); Incentive; Geography; Agricultural economics; Environmental planning; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.019955475054413876,"score_gpt":0.21815539453216531,"score_spread":0.19819991947775145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252331563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079935946,0.032781515,0.01337239,0.7654022,0.010140704,0.00045455998,0.00271381,0.00031847,0.09488046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65372866,0.04196486,0.014027382,0.04437011,0.0014942982,0.00048097788,0.0012884347,0.00018051572,0.24246469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996344,0.00013864694,0.000016903305,0.00002143548,0.00009025225,0.00009842432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746394,0.0011148241,0.00015018324,0.000030487554,0.0009202603,0.0003203466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017853201,0.00037539206,0.00020806713,0.00097257685,0.0021004984,0.0012364544,0.0008426098,0.0011539157,0.008044774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042105606,0.00025582197,0.00019444533,0.0011677281,0.00052200933,0.0015442931,0.00046972255,0.0019611416,0.00108819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030699396,0.00014034394,0.009416332,0.00033025537,0.000036434623,0.00035987885,0.00346086,0.0013864283,0.0011746719,0.023710748,0.8570697,0.102607474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030024667,0.00022394063,0.073234245,0.00049132697,0.00017599794,0.0001422932,0.011078573,0.0026452627,0.0046704244,0.022143895,0.88476497,0.00012888374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08973805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2424164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08973805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028491754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040846663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17843139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291366983","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12340","title":"Can cash incentives modify groundwater pumping behaviors? Evidence from an experiment in Punjab","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Electricity; Cash; Incentive; Mains electricity; Entitlement (fair division); Irrigation; Agricultural economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Finance; Power (physics); Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.011539217203013957,"score_gpt":0.20826987496931154,"score_spread":0.19673065776629758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291366983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99864644,0.000049222006,0.00012735587,0.00018388017,0.0000179072,0.000071849645,0.00011531261,0.000010146265,0.0007780013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997572,0.00011569343,0.0005412886,0.00032141968,0.000011968755,0.00019550348,0.000187135,0.0000066477296,0.0010482668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968093,0.0024059003,0.000077002835,0.00027705068,0.0001851348,0.00024563455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985002,0.009606165,0.002619883,0.0014135021,0.00048375916,0.00087462284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004439024,0.00045438283,0.0005178973,0.00036493014,0.0012097671,0.001275469,0.0013784728,0.0012043249,0.0072001386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008575191,0.0006604107,0.0006761556,0.00062363077,0.0021723516,0.00079046644,0.0009460845,0.0014068788,0.0006769107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11143072,0.22476384,0.49448374,0.0019181543,0.0026980145,0.0014746985,0.012979284,0.0053664898,0.03871869,0.0071820333,0.0087626595,0.090221725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008403472,0.06678988,0.89268553,0.00018746736,0.0013335655,0.00015280211,0.007488983,0.0066414075,0.005541417,0.002957145,0.0076464587,0.00017198954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02150196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024058977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02150196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011465516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001486047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042753577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299879846","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12349","title":"Upside risk, consumption value, and market returns to food safety","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; Agricultural Technology Adoption Initiative","keywords":"Food safety; Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Business; Incentive; Risk premium; Marginal value; Economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.007603255914874827,"score_gpt":0.18602786081267952,"score_spread":0.1784246048978047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299879846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984464,0.00008665267,0.00038539997,0.000117337906,0.0000066467705,0.000031361524,0.000038735176,0.0000030169733,0.0008844394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960226,0.000026325344,0.00015477017,0.000026093192,0.000002542139,0.000017407558,0.0000078671665,3.6985415e-7,0.00016236163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991825,0.0004997761,0.000022015789,0.00010610548,0.00008987243,0.00009963315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908925,0.0064101256,0.0019108248,0.00030795595,0.00007919831,0.00039948997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022238977,0.00025176295,0.0003632168,0.00013920694,0.00017643835,0.0005250854,0.0002533795,0.0006680351,0.005257824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009031215,0.00017425814,0.0003791376,0.000102956124,0.00072767516,0.00040806434,0.00040687164,0.00087025913,0.00014174548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2460331,0.07239218,0.40790358,0.00125716,0.0034973873,0.00069408264,0.0011708586,0.03054534,0.07991297,0.026482522,0.0017359441,0.12837492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009431791,0.1173719,0.7833707,0.00018671963,0.0021864332,0.00023435483,0.000705512,0.045667328,0.01680831,0.021019302,0.0028929012,0.000124792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010968529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009776759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005257824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005150987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031579586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017589152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307462135","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12348","title":"Getting the message out: Information and communication technologies and agricultural extension","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissemination; Information and Communications Technology; Agricultural extension; Control (management); Business; Agriculture; Population; Extension (predicate logic); Optimism; Agricultural science; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science; Geography; Medicine; Telecommunications; Environmental health","score_opus":0.012758885300695345,"score_gpt":0.2069516217289179,"score_spread":0.19419273642822255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307462135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95346296,0.019668547,0.00087894546,0.008703827,0.00023472065,0.00056677643,0.000077544886,0.000016927968,0.016389832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904156,0.0056407824,0.0012987645,0.00096730865,0.00012432558,0.00027882252,0.000018657085,0.000002127513,0.0012536764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445456,0.004494932,0.0001551318,0.00021169288,0.0004436916,0.00023996779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825373,0.015013884,0.0014379073,0.000115882285,0.00028598166,0.00060901407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051970715,0.00022518798,0.00043837389,0.00047135,0.00054373627,0.001459647,0.00041844472,0.0011253378,0.0076097036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016179409,0.00014461727,0.00039031578,0.00061232614,0.0009929707,0.0011921608,0.00070076925,0.00096118264,0.0002118173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02715089,0.032246694,0.10087466,0.01532248,0.0017238966,0.0007265566,0.0050651855,0.002080277,0.005593325,0.01246199,0.004261943,0.7924921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016787838,0.17005748,0.68891644,0.016211417,0.0066332505,0.0010293286,0.01189053,0.0076360884,0.01008428,0.019788919,0.05076179,0.0002027218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020149653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020555202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076097036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065838994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016376161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027485132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312213421","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12369","title":"The land use consequences of rural to urban migration*","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Investment (military); Land use; Panel data; Margin (machine learning); Crop diversity; Agricultural economics; Geography; Natural resource economics; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.013241357312880807,"score_gpt":0.2413296827292767,"score_spread":0.2280883254163959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312213421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977337,0.00013172091,0.00015808863,0.0001660011,0.0000046316927,0.0000043179616,0.0002734584,0.000003194501,0.0015249652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956745,0.00006019025,0.000032486714,0.00001615475,0.000002988052,0.0000024826193,0.00008542059,6.102562e-7,0.00023208385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996024,0.000222424,0.000018317494,0.000031806045,0.000035705874,0.00008929078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983553,0.00039661067,0.0007983955,0.00008062412,0.00022601504,0.00014302031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005250866,0.00015199969,0.00015404106,0.0005468094,0.0003762082,0.0007690086,0.0001802135,0.00023429908,0.0030960594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018561453,0.0000829854,0.0001958455,0.0012867851,0.0005517661,0.0004241131,0.0009384123,0.0003643288,0.00026169434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025549973,0.000108574946,0.97104484,0.00008384862,0.00011042841,0.00045293802,0.0008446706,0.0077126017,0.00083967176,0.0017757823,0.0010619047,0.015709149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066453576,0.00009223205,0.99068695,0.000023614342,0.000022062919,0.00014693478,0.0030520072,0.0031276823,0.0002794932,0.0010122965,0.0015423169,0.000007672437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00732072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010888422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00732072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036902912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001762796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014556229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319444406","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12381","title":"Craig Gundersen","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.004611703622206088,"score_gpt":0.18417241834885065,"score_spread":0.17956071472664456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319444406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014782617,0.06554978,0.0029976538,0.10841094,0.039317183,0.0001469246,0.0031900774,0.0014291789,0.77748007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057284785,0.022011476,0.0014106241,0.013704025,0.0025854923,0.00008019857,0.0011076394,0.00049071386,0.95288146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983734,0.00015493884,0.00006897561,0.0005336632,0.00071735017,0.00015162028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773467,0.00043782266,0.00013009063,0.00014260436,0.0009970263,0.0005577199],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010660453,0.0010740504,0.00059798243,0.0019646783,0.002398266,0.0056675216,0.0013510474,0.0021602681,0.35451868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057999687,0.0004980595,0.00038246543,0.0015501251,0.0008958555,0.0036913217,0.0031202754,0.0031342667,0.16349578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015798327,0.00001182739,0.00011909843,0.00009215904,0.0000015763267,0.00006815163,0.000109849476,0.00003603693,0.00013587685,0.00507772,0.9440332,0.05029878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012164733,0.0000031642471,0.00010274032,0.000057752753,8.781034e-7,0.00006305044,0.000069177775,0.000015352964,0.000055304336,0.00049884105,0.99912864,0.00000381936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011277329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017876823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64548135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026152048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042500137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9207008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362596773","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12400","title":"Estimating the effect of time‐invariant characteristics in panel data: wheat adoption in <scp>Western Canada</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptability; Panel data; Variety (cybernetics); Fixed effects model; Business; Marketing; Econometrics; Biotechnology; Economics; Biology; Mathematics; Statistics; Ecology","score_opus":0.01592743005691276,"score_gpt":0.19906752436629818,"score_spread":0.18314009430938544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362596773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99253285,0.0002589101,0.0011613691,0.00031983416,0.000009754628,0.00003735945,0.004661473,0.000027592116,0.0009909584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883668,0.0002546396,0.001939922,0.00009974835,0.0000057698626,0.00003682157,0.00703805,0.00001203403,0.002246263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884784,0.0003470931,0.000050914514,0.00023055241,0.00021437426,0.00030923728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933295,0.0022336722,0.0012102926,0.00053442153,0.0018020076,0.0008900823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027163648,0.000473067,0.00056755287,0.0011227535,0.0014935511,0.001420911,0.001322613,0.000534061,0.0023880862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006364541,0.00033624138,0.00080895226,0.004244748,0.00060359406,0.00040498807,0.0007428246,0.0010635082,0.00032759958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016010209,0.0001125353,0.9773006,0.000027111437,0.00029715427,0.0001354595,0.00044712462,0.00844694,0.00025413872,0.0006805942,0.0026522847,0.0094858855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002323684,0.000045151333,0.9726386,0.000033248056,0.0001027548,0.000020382691,0.0012034995,0.022866031,0.00023667651,0.00017455175,0.0026299008,0.000025885241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99563086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99470794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016402202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016402202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015367758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11900687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381337286","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12416","title":"Taxing <scp>sugar‐sweetened</scp> beverages: A nonlinear pricing approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Nonlinear pricing; Consumption (sociology); Popularity; Economics; Microeconomics; Price discrimination; Willingness to pay; Economic surplus; Product (mathematics); Profit (economics); Business; Welfare","score_opus":0.014602126209558247,"score_gpt":0.18940636301495792,"score_spread":0.17480423680539967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381337286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53381294,0.0008180495,0.4222293,0.0037332075,0.000108534514,0.00022636139,0.00046319806,0.00013301542,0.038475353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97682124,0.00044151995,0.012699276,0.00013593321,0.000032906068,0.000057462035,0.00004957469,0.000016267964,0.009745758],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956554,0.00021612036,0.000012861231,0.00005982696,0.00007616761,0.00006954459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863404,0.00082598056,0.00025405272,0.00008069779,0.00014418254,0.000060998358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011751928,0.00047635374,0.00062001677,0.00049156,0.0004052333,0.0013274496,0.0012222718,0.00094920304,0.0059616794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033293606,0.00037268797,0.0009265994,0.0005499916,0.0012228907,0.0015765325,0.0008670952,0.0012919122,0.00043565276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019003049,0.00040615996,0.005774963,0.00013351509,0.00008719567,0.00028664374,0.00012693478,0.81630784,0.0031471436,0.15200824,0.0014006459,0.020130644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019956611,0.000053822758,0.0010790412,0.000009344827,0.00002852895,0.00003355625,0.000047627964,0.9671049,0.00032625362,0.030520461,0.00076074735,0.000015664076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016537093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010798632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016537093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00271979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012499784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032881677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388479196","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12438","title":"Farm size, spatial externalities, and wind energy development","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic Research Service; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; Simon Fraser University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Externality; Wind power; Renewable energy; Natural resource economics; Lease; Economic geography; Mile; Geography; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.009368616519283494,"score_gpt":0.22948569402160912,"score_spread":0.22011707750232562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388479196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99775,0.000046253703,0.0003892071,0.00008122726,0.0000013759377,0.000004637421,0.000097068354,0.00000299439,0.0016271981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997696,0.000015248566,0.00003760666,0.0000040187056,0.000001136444,0.0000014961884,0.000035695364,2.9325741e-7,0.00013474104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971026,0.0001211553,0.000016926317,0.000055775276,0.00004452526,0.000051253686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664587,0.0015083513,0.0012499206,0.00015291412,0.00014473504,0.00029825364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005444641,0.00011996271,0.00016427769,0.00048865343,0.00022119799,0.0006293332,0.00022658361,0.00024391958,0.0047697006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025166748,0.00008608327,0.00021461747,0.00068082876,0.0007856876,0.0005069811,0.00062660617,0.0002454687,0.00015227299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003316991,0.00007137734,0.98848176,0.000009455461,0.00004802227,0.00009290176,0.00010412773,0.0067734113,0.00029890693,0.0015151947,0.000102448386,0.002469163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004064986,0.00010254281,0.9882235,0.00000990492,0.000022842762,0.00007499417,0.0009662932,0.007928661,0.0001682216,0.0018423552,0.0006516113,0.000005138237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059713908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012169012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059713908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005142282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025995634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015956283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403251210","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12500","title":"Weather shocks affect trade policy: Evidence from preferential trade agreements","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Economics; International economics; Commercial policy; International trade; Psychology","score_opus":0.05952695159746876,"score_gpt":0.2635452728683472,"score_spread":0.20401832127087846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403251210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98957753,0.0007080785,0.00089566206,0.0012489576,0.00002520126,0.000010073214,0.0009779677,0.000017879473,0.006538537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989955,0.00039429986,0.00006359085,0.00007045009,0.000013791295,0.0000029640096,0.00024621835,0.0000027694637,0.00021038493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.0005067258,0.00011139727,0.0001520226,0.00015007834,0.0001695773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665668,0.015877178,0.013899909,0.0017764297,0.0011361844,0.000743501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019633893,0.00017629674,0.0003722982,0.00055490737,0.00048623316,0.0016692161,0.00035260848,0.0008500099,0.0059969863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01595201,0.00022864244,0.0003830014,0.0017626414,0.0009120348,0.0010917521,0.00090041413,0.0011653934,0.0005615871],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020087364,0.0004977304,0.92778313,0.00021229306,0.00077914837,0.00039215462,0.001151158,0.025276696,0.001290799,0.012195553,0.003920202,0.024492363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024160574,0.0002933078,0.96006584,0.00008966958,0.00034550647,0.00013988976,0.001795786,0.015335003,0.001614198,0.013202333,0.0068091387,0.00006772295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014261393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008357632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014261393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005915284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003644561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02835679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407041346","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12508","title":"How stable and predictable are welfare estimates using recreation demand models?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Global Water Futures; Alberta Environment and Parks; European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists; Alberta Health Services","keywords":"Welfare; Recreation; Predictability; Economics; Nonmarket forces; Econometrics; Valuation (finance); Revealed preference; Stability (learning theory); Survey data collection; Public economics; Statistics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03910373263712994,"score_gpt":0.19317979307048372,"score_spread":0.15407606043335378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407041346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410616,0.00031946387,0.05343362,0.0013647289,0.000029911105,0.00002536168,0.0016034633,0.00007539225,0.0020863363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961611,0.00009272144,0.0026741633,0.000035789257,0.000014629461,0.000013498167,0.0007879785,0.000013783914,0.00020634163],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724543,0.0017850045,0.00012488673,0.00047351758,0.00018254388,0.00018847357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690066,0.02195359,0.0050271438,0.0026897741,0.0009538737,0.00036891762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009720913,0.00041906626,0.0005491912,0.00094743166,0.00038007146,0.002312021,0.0011234381,0.0009201496,0.001325468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03713286,0.00042791324,0.0009923691,0.001308367,0.000747635,0.002582983,0.0008473029,0.0014318472,0.00023981305],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002754332,0.00019557045,0.440305,0.00007459749,0.00075031794,0.00012929697,0.0003295031,0.5217708,0.0004953473,0.015373576,0.0020589377,0.018241676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019554385,0.0000988951,0.07815744,0.00005110876,0.00005993888,0.000034917153,0.00038652477,0.894553,0.00066739554,0.024943346,0.000977052,0.000050795876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018142829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013067605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018142829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013759389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000803642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05140966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413088353","doi":"10.1111/ajae.70001","title":"A reply to “Quality standards, industry structure, and welfare in a global economy”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Ambiguity; Welfare; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Public economics; Market economy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016019518535214862,"score_gpt":0.2398838602748735,"score_spread":0.22386434173965863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413088353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034110862,0.00059822795,0.00020872403,0.99404234,0.004118079,0.0000022465972,0.00005353125,0.000008941636,0.0006268631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020045588,0.0011906903,0.00037030867,0.95951307,0.016212309,0.000028783408,0.000042465595,0.000033329943,0.0025635923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946228,0.002622882,0.00039121695,0.00093190314,0.0009910038,0.00044012434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96707815,0.024976058,0.0013111952,0.0011124191,0.004588832,0.0009333569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008965159,0.0008531876,0.0013295107,0.000848854,0.0033252554,0.003296763,0.00332402,0.031942736,0.0049159983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03891423,0.0005219544,0.0012485856,0.0014661315,0.0065651573,0.00474212,0.0026718546,0.02884927,0.0017051777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004949796,0.000013005372,0.0004969718,0.00006436521,0.0000197418,0.00017227029,0.00048492974,0.00020884801,0.00013304871,0.039896976,0.9557084,0.0027520224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016687214,0.00006822161,0.0040882956,0.00061269896,0.000077379336,0.00046814597,0.0026664832,0.0014011149,0.0010192156,0.121142745,0.86809415,0.00019477891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008147905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007745177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031942736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033457328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034509825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047412872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415339950","doi":"10.1111/ajae.70020","title":"Harvesting benefits: Exploring the effects of second‐best policies on enhancing soil organic carbon stocks in agriculture","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Saskatchewan Wheat Development Commission","keywords":"Subsidy; Cropping; Soil carbon; Agriculture; Soil organic matter; Social cost; Hectare; Organic farming","score_opus":0.009691822471483928,"score_gpt":0.19315354718467606,"score_spread":0.18346172471319214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415339950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98534924,0.00031389794,0.0028640965,0.0014091333,0.000022655095,0.000084887484,0.0007932202,0.000039288036,0.009123597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977709,0.0001208964,0.0008434727,0.00013127687,0.000005325213,0.000021090025,0.00012610489,0.000003875549,0.0009769886],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880314,0.00060354156,0.000022371229,0.00012780124,0.0000930313,0.00035014434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940467,0.0046245446,0.00052434875,0.00025259933,0.0002958993,0.00025596182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035272245,0.00068920513,0.0009512569,0.0007245288,0.0005976192,0.0023034513,0.0011971131,0.0014474859,0.0038362392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058810855,0.00032157355,0.0010724493,0.0009957218,0.0010054326,0.0012992078,0.0009863733,0.0012108594,0.00018047022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000859846,0.00066721236,0.035077333,0.00017100917,0.0003344127,0.00019550994,0.00008786393,0.9330493,0.00169454,0.015781125,0.0016210724,0.0104607325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045635508,0.0015384104,0.069007374,0.0000768505,0.0004383161,0.00005840392,0.0010513595,0.8971002,0.0025653176,0.023508405,0.0041134264,0.000085563195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17148073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17683066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17148073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009160962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060231164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34096515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415683381","doi":"10.1111/ajae.70018","title":"Market regulation and productivity: The case of the Canadian Wheat Board","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Productivity; Counterfactual thinking; Context (archaeology); Monopsony; Agricultural productivity; Estimation; Agriculture; Regulatory reform","score_opus":0.006159811761933867,"score_gpt":0.1863308176299134,"score_spread":0.18017100586797954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415683381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97294563,0.00064128847,0.00083439454,0.0030701077,0.000019408275,0.00004833971,0.0012585059,0.000025178671,0.021157097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685514,0.00018637364,0.00016974904,0.00010387887,0.0000074805766,0.00000845437,0.00030608842,0.0000028968539,0.0023599123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985154,0.00019360248,0.00003477914,0.00019697525,0.0004065797,0.0006525957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315864,0.0022720154,0.0017785161,0.00042002051,0.0014999642,0.0008708972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019249904,0.00022685988,0.00037450882,0.0015886765,0.0026675444,0.0027304695,0.0013895524,0.00085776945,0.004525628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009297755,0.00016355077,0.0005825601,0.002280353,0.0023478656,0.00063790823,0.0008462935,0.0012589253,0.0001630183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003494436,0.00037780692,0.85005885,0.00010899555,0.00027681226,0.0013007442,0.002542626,0.034919325,0.0019200153,0.05904367,0.012031524,0.037070263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001059269,0.00007625125,0.9418218,0.0000565373,0.00017274891,0.00006161321,0.004251838,0.023474738,0.00087156985,0.005981695,0.023054859,0.00007045118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04532083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04532083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024521153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3288272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}