{"meta":{"query_hash":"482b7aabdd5d","filters":{"venue":"American Political Science Review"},"cohort_total":143,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":143,"exported":143,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/482b7aabdd5d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+Political+Science+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1968639397","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406062472","title":"The Influence of European Émigré Scholars on Comparative Politics, 1925–1965","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Americanization; Politics; Émigré; Comparative politics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Comparative research; Social science; Economic history; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.04405632931130666,"score_gpt":0.4365385975486604,"score_spread":0.39248226823735377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968639397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31973422,0.2518091,0.0010553561,0.04114295,0.0022345479,0.00002676104,0.00009224572,0.000020397049,0.3838845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454637,0.031391565,0.00038108302,0.0040912894,0.001166118,0.000020493231,0.000029251742,0.000016612965,0.01743991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956055,0.0029786963,0.00017924195,0.0004389006,0.0003345675,0.00046304698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875372,0.009939071,0.0008120609,0.00036812105,0.0007913632,0.0005522061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014983123,0.00044749753,0.00057736185,0.0037788744,0.006471444,0.0071012615,0.0004273313,0.002380958,0.002975621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01477341,0.0003463908,0.00025102447,0.0053050066,0.012901421,0.004332444,0.0044872533,0.0022501037,0.00023661992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032269518,0.00007709316,0.0058284197,0.00036768144,0.000038461956,0.0008273965,0.06353818,0.00033162476,0.00040084013,0.85055846,0.016470736,0.061238475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030855812,0.00008816473,0.025455901,0.0014574858,0.000032310872,0.00045858388,0.020477843,0.0001536263,0.0011649843,0.026744092,0.9239067,0.000029392519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008431507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011490799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014983123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009405256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002663531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07923925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973580860","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402390361","title":"Liberalism Beyond Justice: Citizens, Society, and the Boundaries of Political Theory By John Tomasi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 163p. $55.00 cloth, $15.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Economic Justice; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Neglect; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.027732150176438493,"score_gpt":0.313853610090718,"score_spread":0.2861214599142795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973580860","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00100478,0.7790804,0.002075925,0.16285177,0.0029330668,0.000022161728,0.00005868184,0.00003314095,0.051940072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103604615,0.6995074,0.0060478253,0.04007985,0.0077673835,0.00019413531,0.00017506012,0.0001436742,0.14248002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999278,0.00037773416,0.000025477852,0.000075288444,0.0001900926,0.00005339539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990559,0.00058664253,0.000082048435,0.00004224833,0.00012737965,0.000105673585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012334354,0.00083558576,0.00049091515,0.0016571971,0.00236259,0.0038993375,0.00083256204,0.002254157,0.004700533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022500823,0.0006663872,0.0003233764,0.0035255437,0.007004628,0.0076653375,0.001655952,0.005481011,0.0016959339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025567993,0.000038392354,0.000278703,0.00038864106,0.00001765687,0.000079309386,0.0036757058,0.00023807467,0.0001434339,0.24353774,0.6977531,0.053823717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013655013,0.000011507888,0.0008323715,0.00078751834,0.000009796861,0.00015561526,0.0012492011,0.00018250597,0.00007890192,0.23420537,0.7624586,0.000014839588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015677387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021821706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015677387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039461977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053342595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031172276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977629785","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402630242","title":"Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation. Edited by Arun Agrawal and Clark C. Gibson. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2001. 232p. $60.00 cloth, $23.00 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Dilemma; Natural resource; Common-pool resource; State (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Law; Philosophy; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027611413029160658,"score_gpt":0.2280081469259155,"score_spread":0.20039673389675486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977629785","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013651131,0.9538842,0.00063719234,0.024270419,0.0024502103,0.000014259798,0.00006113573,0.000021457365,0.017296065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056319263,0.914571,0.0012000637,0.004446169,0.0031156912,0.00007102817,0.00010025398,0.000040699062,0.020135878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916995,0.0005033174,0.000028098286,0.000060992046,0.00015165212,0.00008606648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985116,0.0008550301,0.00011497948,0.000051451094,0.00018584686,0.00028108188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019825508,0.0017329479,0.0015011709,0.0027006932,0.002532619,0.005815555,0.001491474,0.0027071198,0.010296238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025935338,0.00089826155,0.00042836132,0.0055574835,0.007205731,0.0071816943,0.0025341795,0.0024153085,0.0012984482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005013149,0.00010349229,0.0036383027,0.002200485,0.00009325893,0.00038568806,0.020635944,0.0005885142,0.00018717993,0.11925779,0.5628798,0.28997937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025278505,0.00004544524,0.008433268,0.0058625075,0.00007151968,0.0005789506,0.024294067,0.00040419525,0.00009880083,0.13291998,0.827219,0.000046849116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0354196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09155842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0354196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034118108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060304003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07042682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977854395","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402240460","title":"Natural Law Modernized. By David Braybrooke. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001. 351p. $70.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Postmodernism; Utilitarianism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02961032787433917,"score_gpt":0.3285258358194835,"score_spread":0.2989155079451444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977854395","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023348663,0.9046741,0.00064470683,0.03450269,0.002897455,0.000016536127,0.00064239174,0.00013135377,0.056257244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0134372385,0.7398519,0.001780876,0.0076256087,0.0029654827,0.00006932972,0.0008594761,0.00024250131,0.23316766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922276,0.00014884013,0.000065498374,0.0001044308,0.00036956416,0.00008880915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870193,0.0004271028,0.00020140034,0.00010077064,0.0003570722,0.00021172823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012253877,0.0016132494,0.0008453642,0.00328913,0.0018533716,0.0039840424,0.0013085708,0.0028272886,0.065089785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025042086,0.0019271574,0.00046107025,0.00785838,0.003992394,0.006383262,0.001904083,0.0046687773,0.023451155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012925506,0.0000069863995,0.00012093245,0.00056807423,0.00000850147,0.000058689748,0.0005811629,0.00011438861,0.00007342371,0.018904513,0.9377595,0.041790802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004564324,0.000003062423,0.0009948881,0.000547431,0.000006237805,0.000088426525,0.00027420957,0.000039975464,0.000018452894,0.0049824053,0.99303234,0.000008072567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2656382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51092905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2656382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013433746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009402538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52818406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980971524","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402680360","title":"Commissioned Ridings: Designing Canada's Electoral Districts. By John C. Courtney. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2001. 337p. $75.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Parliament; Democracy; Proportional representation; Politics; Political science; Turnout; Institution; Representation (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Voting","score_opus":0.017902668694837507,"score_gpt":0.2714401018837653,"score_spread":0.25353743318892774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980971524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010386342,0.42030883,0.052628573,0.072662264,0.0061904825,0.0012670032,0.008341366,0.0038191155,0.42439604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046624947,0.09056317,0.03916694,0.0030334354,0.0003429376,0.00024732912,0.0025489505,0.001249407,0.81622297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991974,0.000097175325,0.000023852182,0.000107174295,0.00041388327,0.00016043612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942315,0.00006590611,0.000026745496,0.000024525056,0.00031007174,0.00014958585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011428866,0.0010423478,0.0004005897,0.0019008125,0.0056424923,0.005427587,0.0015363934,0.0010270037,0.03887082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020917968,0.0010765048,0.00036784753,0.00506087,0.002264752,0.002101378,0.0014845097,0.0013540153,0.013257254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596726,0.00001102801,0.00066160713,0.00018607976,0.000007302011,0.000048436512,0.0011420737,0.00090716145,0.0002422745,0.007530408,0.8092699,0.17997774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054058705,0.0000056866415,0.0018208026,0.00014941134,0.000005598981,0.0000351393,0.00093475694,0.00022859072,0.00012437024,0.00097289815,0.99570066,0.000016611775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9458774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98560077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054122627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025260845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038603257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18328112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984245235","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402310244","title":"Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics. By Wendy Gunther-Canada. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2001. 224p. $38.00","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Politics; Conversation; Feminism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Literature; Religious studies; Sociology; Art; Gender studies; Theology; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020280461987598305,"score_gpt":0.2196937369858801,"score_spread":0.1994132749982818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984245235","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021698796,0.5942827,0.00035246916,0.15957858,0.01656999,0.00007014932,0.00034671422,0.000139474,0.22649005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014997283,0.111240126,0.00030529106,0.027356325,0.002712116,0.00007050827,0.00018948046,0.00009654237,0.8430323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996959,0.000048086746,0.000009707728,0.000049303108,0.00014724932,0.000049800954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949145,0.00013911318,0.000051049017,0.000019425013,0.0001852075,0.000113880174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004918744,0.00068819505,0.00049116486,0.0012730041,0.002162071,0.00220477,0.000645804,0.001626329,0.047562957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012937555,0.00043334844,0.0001244911,0.0014659648,0.00094073906,0.0018220796,0.0011565104,0.0019029197,0.015226549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008203695,0.000007037197,0.00007468135,0.00008145247,0.0000013085129,0.000037718575,0.00041819576,0.000010716444,0.00004534442,0.002236646,0.9790493,0.018029414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027917363,0.0000031993252,0.00033961984,0.0002063541,0.0000015064754,0.00005598242,0.00061674614,0.0000059366953,0.00003077376,0.0003271178,0.9984079,0.000002102786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063570485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16884676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063570485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028170806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028928472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15911394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991275501","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402294319","title":"Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. By Bent Flyvbjerg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 201p. $54.95 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Quarter (Canadian coin); Norm (philosophy); Bent molecular geometry; Politics; Similarity (geometry); Political science; Sociology; Social science; History; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1700335627941907,"score_gpt":0.44300536854702993,"score_spread":0.2729718057528392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991275501","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021553796,0.77458304,0.00136166,0.2056287,0.004870724,0.000019507983,0.000056533016,0.000056010536,0.013208294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026080612,0.8516398,0.0056113396,0.041142665,0.01291861,0.00018339207,0.00015178224,0.00031712124,0.061954677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572206,0.0024482822,0.00023571083,0.00039373018,0.00096202805,0.00023807574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98133904,0.014751957,0.00058347813,0.00059679453,0.0018274202,0.0009012192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110107465,0.0019484292,0.0014382263,0.0036075003,0.0029326894,0.008593123,0.0017200918,0.0065208892,0.015153661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021047778,0.0014591973,0.0006943144,0.0041288515,0.020728003,0.017163914,0.0032233237,0.010199571,0.0085113635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002972884,0.000025875459,0.00032333395,0.001266098,0.00004962697,0.00008047966,0.0021746207,0.00021747418,0.00011815582,0.08238023,0.808342,0.10499242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022555088,0.0000258989,0.0011134339,0.0034087598,0.000020156758,0.00018096813,0.0025994368,0.00027665464,0.00008769334,0.23076487,0.7614646,0.000035013185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011375612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025571574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98898923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00448896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006464482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058231115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996146536","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402474333","title":"Unemployment and Government: Genealogies of the Social By William Walters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 240p. $64.95 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Unemployment; Governmentality; Politics; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Corporate governance; Generalization; Positive economics; Political economy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Management; Economic growth; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027786679304642806,"score_gpt":0.3085491523664461,"score_spread":0.2807624730618033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996146536","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017225032,0.8829147,0.00079751643,0.07943629,0.0013558922,0.000013352103,0.00009553905,0.000021523354,0.033642642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089019984,0.7907291,0.0014310273,0.013349198,0.0027442388,0.00009796808,0.00019020335,0.00005812593,0.1023802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993647,0.00029667176,0.000035354788,0.00006170943,0.00016056324,0.00008096806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.00028208265,0.00007406639,0.000019951702,0.000052524145,0.000060428636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008885002,0.0005265895,0.0004274729,0.0017696366,0.001343426,0.0025403535,0.0007185017,0.0023344418,0.0050483113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022102892,0.00057651143,0.00029154567,0.0035419937,0.0037520917,0.004394798,0.0010538192,0.0021460024,0.0013520329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003836565,0.000031076353,0.00086607336,0.0006403631,0.00002134959,0.00014841913,0.006652423,0.00043352362,0.000090183756,0.20467421,0.6908052,0.09559884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000820691,0.000012751299,0.0022097053,0.001144339,0.00000855269,0.000141942,0.001783258,0.00010876108,0.000028886148,0.0493195,0.9452231,0.000011015941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042366542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0526745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042366542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004088328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040366245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08423984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015168179","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402214318","title":"The Future of Teledemocracy. By Ted Becker and Christa Daryl Slaton. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000. 248p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Futurist; Manifesto; Ideology; Democracy; Politics; Art history; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Religious studies; Law; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.014317816149892255,"score_gpt":0.32009425345085135,"score_spread":0.3057764373009591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015168179","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046641714,0.8063345,0.00050620845,0.13742445,0.004410404,0.0000131211345,0.00006916519,0.000029726025,0.05074599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03135244,0.712791,0.0011171435,0.041034386,0.0060403617,0.00009715168,0.00013122063,0.000091251284,0.20734514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991209,0.0003443978,0.000032949894,0.00009381592,0.0003049508,0.00010298261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868816,0.00072803453,0.00016304602,0.000051365416,0.00024309453,0.00012625984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013494638,0.00070160185,0.0003903511,0.0017312528,0.001619628,0.0035691792,0.0008495253,0.002916317,0.014722485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036465654,0.00061476364,0.00030305487,0.0028678593,0.00364773,0.0082990555,0.0016187,0.003902033,0.0054097804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019931147,0.00001896739,0.00014256673,0.00036559976,0.000009021612,0.00005214986,0.0008335988,0.000060596696,0.00005281473,0.047163937,0.89614564,0.055135146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068187264,0.000009150171,0.00044594327,0.000858139,0.0000040820123,0.00010459189,0.0006200678,0.00003578878,0.00004000447,0.01612451,0.9817437,0.0000072748235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010201328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021467332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014722485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030483205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037647001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049251676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022935061","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402230361","title":"The Problems of Communitarian Politics: Unity and Conflict By Elizabeth Frazer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 279p. $70.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Politics; Sociology; Locality; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Liberalism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030381592904924336,"score_gpt":0.28773730804064185,"score_spread":0.25735571513571753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022935061","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083215104,0.8824725,0.0014974764,0.072195336,0.0026501592,0.000020472347,0.00006710359,0.0000352544,0.040229514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046502896,0.74205256,0.003134365,0.013802662,0.004115237,0.00013195767,0.00019199341,0.000118372074,0.18994994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993407,0.00031594938,0.000028086637,0.00007431704,0.00017188619,0.00006896886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892336,0.00067660527,0.00011340989,0.000040924435,0.00012178494,0.00012389499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001985356,0.0014493762,0.0007645058,0.0018084147,0.0027852391,0.004678468,0.0011039238,0.0026616948,0.009804668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002598092,0.0009837919,0.00033596694,0.0040179687,0.006344718,0.009226563,0.0021402948,0.0048532863,0.0036411036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024480843,0.00002553237,0.00027740313,0.0004091819,0.000012741087,0.00009527261,0.005832995,0.00022739981,0.000071782335,0.1018603,0.8237983,0.06736463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007162042,0.000012453806,0.0008030254,0.001236837,0.0000062484173,0.00022125104,0.0036320917,0.00011859862,0.00005334912,0.04942539,0.9444693,0.000014259623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011425193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019729123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011425193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032326258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003386668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0327999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039350129","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000227","title":"Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Temple University; Yale University; Harvard University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Politics; Disadvantage; Gender gap; Socialization; Political science; Representation (politics); Gender studies; Sociology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05509635796580101,"score_gpt":0.3946754689008339,"score_spread":0.3395791109350329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039350129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497667,0.017491302,0.0015912537,0.0050443015,0.00012452292,0.000036413494,0.00048856373,0.0000051203356,0.025451789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945786,0.0036399409,0.00024638293,0.00047969684,0.00004835373,0.000027806032,0.00014667214,0.0000032138926,0.00082939613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967828,0.0019840572,0.00012175366,0.00033163468,0.0004376597,0.0003421348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943667,0.0033049516,0.0011797099,0.00021443542,0.00071080035,0.00022343695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005727332,0.00009751927,0.00033448546,0.0014939992,0.00046567692,0.0008024009,0.00035450107,0.00038959275,0.0022666545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010685851,0.00012136481,0.00015265403,0.002347795,0.0009929385,0.0008218822,0.0010196412,0.00044916727,0.00029873126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021739338,0.00007728385,0.7539228,0.0006573106,0.0001341166,0.00045768757,0.03214352,0.00021345756,0.0012261538,0.047024902,0.00764589,0.15627949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013792163,0.00010258301,0.9247396,0.00042665625,0.00004952389,0.00026797704,0.031565327,0.00032136976,0.00035505963,0.0074935122,0.034649964,0.000014665645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057783644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012206586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057783644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005664196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000950451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030289412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042691157","doi":"10.1017/s000305540298024x","title":"After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. By G. John Ikenberry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 293p. $55.00 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Diplomacy; Politics; Peacemaking; Order (exchange); Political science; International relations; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.01999229398596373,"score_gpt":0.2914476496660939,"score_spread":0.27145535568013013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042691157","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009358178,0.92111915,0.00025976237,0.05771717,0.0021175111,0.000008838379,0.000041592666,0.000012544103,0.017787633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05386291,0.8624967,0.00078618387,0.010890575,0.0047960957,0.00006857169,0.00010692379,0.000057792673,0.06693429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964225,0.00014549743,0.000014789405,0.000058072972,0.00008038219,0.00005894604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999305,0.00036446206,0.00011710185,0.000024217195,0.000075100936,0.00011417318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088688725,0.0010289846,0.0006007353,0.0016274011,0.0020541756,0.0033988955,0.0010028114,0.002641276,0.0085547175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022612433,0.0005857403,0.00031459867,0.0036599352,0.0062286584,0.007310653,0.0018172493,0.0035232226,0.0025839612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061381405,0.00007126794,0.00056998996,0.00072860846,0.00004143343,0.00017070679,0.004784434,0.000299865,0.00014691838,0.0909127,0.79098874,0.11122397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002498599,0.00003368558,0.0037666874,0.0018204611,0.000019494028,0.00023607952,0.004290014,0.00012806003,0.0000818187,0.08480858,0.90477014,0.000019977357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012113707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028604005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012113707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024585882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002578123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028618395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045153896","doi":"10.2307/2585913","title":"International Management of the Environment: Pollution Control in North America. By Emmett N. Lombard. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999. 198p. $59.95.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Control (management); Economic history; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0037931415000963856,"score_gpt":0.23230547050677758,"score_spread":0.2285123290066812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045153896","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024805314,0.8802023,0.00043047394,0.03667408,0.0044832937,0.000033396373,0.0014800513,0.0001560403,0.07629229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070011374,0.73280597,0.0010656004,0.007435601,0.002426421,0.00014121026,0.0017489693,0.0001418863,0.24723329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950504,0.00009054945,0.00003941954,0.00007913583,0.00022526916,0.000060544226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999257,0.0001802435,0.00016894274,0.000035220142,0.0002284749,0.00013015947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008069682,0.0026345304,0.00080864585,0.002968206,0.0011585597,0.0019981167,0.0014076508,0.003133909,0.07454989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017138232,0.0010749236,0.0003493843,0.005974389,0.0015270901,0.0042694425,0.0019794567,0.0037985714,0.026952125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006962929,0.0000073098195,0.00008871997,0.00013729781,0.0000032565729,0.000009678296,0.000059730777,0.00004922606,0.000034010016,0.0013536917,0.97175545,0.026494602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068646173,0.000009248423,0.0037298882,0.001463011,0.0000084478115,0.00007018663,0.0002639063,0.000086247834,0.00006978244,0.002255122,0.99202627,0.00001097352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08839701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18670897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08839701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034901113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003553149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24939418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048550557","doi":"10.2307/2586227","title":"Postmodernism Rightly Understood: The Return to Realism in American Thought. By Peter Augustine Lawler. Lanham, MD: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 1999. 193p. $60.00 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"University Challenges and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Montana","keywords":"Postmodernism; Realism; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023694821365896564,"score_gpt":0.33222960697509046,"score_spread":0.3085347856091939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048550557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004193421,0.3735335,0.0016210761,0.49593398,0.002848853,0.000008267393,0.000034335208,0.000025764757,0.12180084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66941255,0.22070761,0.0019919516,0.040066008,0.009976828,0.00007966166,0.00004606652,0.000079259495,0.05763997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654263,0.0026606414,0.00005542892,0.00014486918,0.0003997972,0.00019657183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996014,0.0027730872,0.00032778975,0.0002814187,0.00039656495,0.00020708881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043357876,0.0003610054,0.00038200046,0.0011701115,0.0040978855,0.005153699,0.00062295474,0.0024527293,0.0045820237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008982682,0.00029684586,0.0002486759,0.0017078156,0.022624813,0.008570822,0.0023056373,0.005168315,0.00069555023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018803214,0.00001373554,0.00015847287,0.00015302097,0.0000072062044,0.00004196855,0.0057646977,0.00010827945,0.00004694055,0.8236078,0.1434407,0.026638472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012978626,0.000008588696,0.0007818068,0.00052736996,0.0000041129033,0.000050369505,0.0029323183,0.00013639784,0.00005499336,0.61375296,0.38172984,0.000008322274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009049533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017869063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009049533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006245715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055677015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04531604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059528998","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401552028","title":"Building Democracy in South Asia: India, Nepal, Pakistan. By Maya Chadda. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000. 247p. $49.95 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Maya; Anachronism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Monarchy; Communalism; Political economy; Ancient history; Geography; Economic history; History; Sociology; Law; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021062237960945807,"score_gpt":0.3746716993386029,"score_spread":0.3536094613776571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059528998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016470995,0.88646287,0.00042307266,0.049700264,0.0035946693,0.00003597627,0.00034772875,0.00012862799,0.057659797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027809452,0.7589688,0.0012375228,0.007680433,0.0016253716,0.00010565613,0.0004232543,0.00010560746,0.20204389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984443,0.00003522412,0.00001132213,0.000026733585,0.00004891102,0.000033374785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948406,0.00018418665,0.00007283525,0.000019855897,0.00011251793,0.00012654508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004864035,0.0012918796,0.000602597,0.0011539964,0.0017662236,0.002746466,0.00071202626,0.0016914078,0.03679181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009824684,0.00080566853,0.00031875473,0.003957418,0.0012179188,0.004806976,0.0017567948,0.0032998149,0.01182812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025883308,0.000035619127,0.0006358137,0.0007583005,0.000020836218,0.00015005625,0.001846883,0.0001666461,0.0001451423,0.007777826,0.86878055,0.11965633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118198,0.000022307358,0.0033418594,0.0011432405,0.000020628688,0.0002698034,0.0024098165,0.00007385171,0.00010956416,0.0042761522,0.9883084,0.000012624624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02189544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058453724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03679181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016615639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038281858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12308085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084136514","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402850249","title":"Social Movements and Economic Transition: Markets and Distributive Conflict in Mexico. By Heather L. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 239p. $54.95.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Unrest; Social unrest; Social movement; Distributive property; State (computer science); Political economy; Construct (python library); Sociology; Social conflict; Political science; Development economics; Economic history; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02099036787468898,"score_gpt":0.2919131899159458,"score_spread":0.2709228220412568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084136514","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009926655,0.88950765,0.0004201065,0.094853856,0.001689961,0.000016433252,0.00013125973,0.000029376288,0.01235862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038407676,0.8889806,0.0013541385,0.009383173,0.006731644,0.00011230052,0.00024641253,0.000057954625,0.054726105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977094,0.000093372495,0.000012466334,0.00003566479,0.000051122053,0.00003637768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995185,0.00026340882,0.000091838505,0.000016061758,0.000047041045,0.0000630778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084560947,0.0017316994,0.0006420791,0.0024226338,0.0016256999,0.0027980998,0.0011449488,0.0033274386,0.013519322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014060556,0.0007911993,0.00046438677,0.0049138083,0.003578287,0.0069840513,0.0018838663,0.0031163474,0.0021403194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050390838,0.00006892407,0.0013549788,0.0007544772,0.00003790464,0.00017216883,0.0027160263,0.00049971585,0.00014092083,0.06205539,0.80583644,0.12631276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030164714,0.000042382515,0.010143794,0.0028439304,0.000037067442,0.00035059158,0.0034365905,0.0005985458,0.000101265694,0.06960866,0.9127749,0.000032032884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026376972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042469468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026376972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032858318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019028988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052446842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087349263","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402300248","title":"Social Rights Under the Constitution: Government and the Decent Life. By Cecile Fabre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 202p. $72.00 cloth.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Democracy; Constitution; Politics; Redistribution of income and wealth; Political science; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.023360687693729617,"score_gpt":0.266718145314843,"score_spread":0.24335745762111338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087349263","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002339606,0.92665833,0.00042407017,0.04630127,0.002990498,0.000013050531,0.00012973651,0.000036945294,0.023212222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029023763,0.8448222,0.0018703976,0.012497741,0.0075730593,0.00011755632,0.00042100705,0.00013099994,0.10354329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991321,0.00037034065,0.00004700591,0.00012565742,0.00021263832,0.00011225082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875736,0.00067652576,0.00017260728,0.00007308596,0.00019773451,0.00012267174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019588973,0.0024850338,0.0010667614,0.0035857947,0.0020725618,0.0042683883,0.0011810276,0.0052792355,0.019838158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037731922,0.0011381117,0.00041338566,0.004335199,0.0068468964,0.008033313,0.0021098533,0.0053052306,0.009885328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022705706,0.000014798913,0.00016745052,0.00030430322,0.000009040098,0.0000618565,0.0009113835,0.00014643313,0.00004131975,0.045595396,0.8723766,0.08034859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011610602,0.000013000108,0.0013349653,0.0019150089,0.0000059654194,0.0002610579,0.00081927626,0.00010092648,0.000039642702,0.04031035,0.9551703,0.000017919238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02104882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0362592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02104882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052064504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002953666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06636524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093080193","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402330466","title":"After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. By Glen Newey. New York: Palgrave, 2001. 253p. $68.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Liberalism; Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08256955769673271,"score_gpt":0.3547312467950858,"score_spread":0.27216168909835303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093080193","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014291765,0.5724574,0.0023696825,0.21372402,0.006817322,0.000020731031,0.00010923762,0.000060256363,0.2030122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.074168734,0.34066275,0.002759698,0.058117066,0.006447735,0.00024147469,0.00023112619,0.00040194692,0.5169695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886453,0.0004922236,0.00004698078,0.00014029,0.00034506878,0.00011091958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986486,0.00088854204,0.00013600735,0.00006504045,0.00014431479,0.00011765809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017642456,0.00083917164,0.0007542795,0.0011605666,0.0027970485,0.007228523,0.0011989813,0.0037417943,0.01730251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040812246,0.0008595155,0.00040079345,0.0028297228,0.009305747,0.01306514,0.0024784908,0.007354712,0.005491269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024801351,0.00002186859,0.00017584654,0.0002970273,0.000009747648,0.00011140239,0.004228193,0.00017260827,0.000083691244,0.29732803,0.6498021,0.04774473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005479061,0.000004756343,0.00036086756,0.00068236294,0.0000032445896,0.00008016584,0.0015608169,0.00009269224,0.000029831912,0.09132022,0.90585035,0.000009251415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015049696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024662085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01730251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054002935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004157744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057882667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098877340","doi":"10.2307/2586386","title":"Political Parties and Foreign Aid","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":261,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"LISREL; Politics; Foreign policy; Political science; Left-wing politics; Welfare state; Relevance (law); Foreign policy analysis; Political economy; State (computer science); Welfare; Democracy; Economics; Structural equation modeling; Law","score_opus":0.023462084276388212,"score_gpt":0.3637938431761314,"score_spread":0.3403317588997432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098877340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6667723,0.014506803,0.0019811343,0.008100301,0.00013662787,0.000019298357,0.0002931423,0.00002119348,0.3081692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926293,0.0027528391,0.00012913276,0.0002444865,0.00007085758,0.0000050151975,0.000058061778,0.0000043751215,0.004106008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998825,0.00065512874,0.00002901705,0.00007064386,0.00017125589,0.0002488887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968706,0.0014878276,0.00084417156,0.00012559978,0.00035403893,0.00031781607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015010322,0.00008671379,0.00020743719,0.001229242,0.0007173444,0.002248887,0.00014358947,0.00033623847,0.008788517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00494299,0.00006831803,0.00023361514,0.0017035634,0.0010037075,0.0007431308,0.0011173125,0.0005617009,0.0006039695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043475398,0.00019132103,0.3466849,0.00048946106,0.00041090534,0.0005899918,0.005320333,0.0042458554,0.00080804876,0.42755222,0.012674581,0.20059761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007968063,0.00016997028,0.6879076,0.00045812302,0.00022165386,0.0006755262,0.00788088,0.0026048578,0.0007011083,0.13073187,0.16852294,0.00004590202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030633002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039477856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008788517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081973604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056569476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029400527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099357836","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402464313","title":"Reproducing the State. By Jacqueline Stevens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. 307p. $49.50 cloth, $18.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Politics; Ethnic group; Democracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Race (biology); Centrality; White (mutation); Gender studies; Political economy; Anthropology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028464253389429286,"score_gpt":0.31051809362126337,"score_spread":0.2820538402318341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099357836","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006415912,0.7586143,0.002106694,0.07217604,0.010903452,0.000049390474,0.0006963111,0.00034557603,0.15446666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013113101,0.31802517,0.0032506415,0.014539633,0.0041420055,0.00011319677,0.0006028792,0.00038065063,0.64583266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997247,0.00008276696,0.000019973506,0.000055886936,0.00009196789,0.000024624103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996253,0.00015144484,0.00005440141,0.000025039555,0.00007390496,0.00006977403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071249285,0.0014870408,0.0005149299,0.0017775976,0.0012315279,0.0023396695,0.00089434464,0.0017345193,0.06730785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013890351,0.00090282894,0.00036503506,0.0024515921,0.0015868797,0.004177806,0.00129089,0.002697378,0.033274963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010476864,0.000010062251,0.00009539144,0.00013419814,0.0000044101785,0.00003392019,0.00020730062,0.0000546958,0.000079268866,0.0083676595,0.9519507,0.03905181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046228215,0.00000687943,0.00047838493,0.0002578355,0.000003218576,0.0001050533,0.00020863056,0.00005441353,0.000040660794,0.003658507,0.9951762,0.000005578272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021064306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04859563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06730785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013588668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011052308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22516721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103247366","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402444334","title":"The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State: Institutions and Interest Group Power in the United States, France, and Japan By Adam D. Sheingate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001. 279p. $45.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interest group; Agrarian society; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Proposition; Political science; State (computer science); Welfare; Power (physics); Political economy; Agriculture; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.019344369349293282,"score_gpt":0.23356832447571188,"score_spread":0.2142239551264186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103247366","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010870536,0.8832524,0.00054506405,0.09467707,0.0031027892,0.00001319418,0.00012957474,0.000025734174,0.01716719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040513434,0.8487733,0.0015947063,0.013774294,0.0076777735,0.00005474737,0.00030660434,0.00007438807,0.087230876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968183,0.00013250894,0.000012700657,0.000052591975,0.00007839575,0.000041908832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931335,0.0004317646,0.0000777352,0.000012408782,0.000079299236,0.00008539023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012364326,0.0012533959,0.0006023527,0.002479369,0.0017583133,0.0026662392,0.00096042245,0.0023544256,0.011574913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011307449,0.00069103524,0.00040937366,0.0046095527,0.003486963,0.0062813926,0.001978738,0.0037689945,0.0033895853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042762273,0.000041075946,0.0010707569,0.0003824238,0.000026821957,0.000097433796,0.0016409864,0.00024727473,0.00008889241,0.03784601,0.8844544,0.07406104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021184338,0.000028518987,0.0060876203,0.0010643462,0.000029406212,0.00024388338,0.0018142594,0.00031357983,0.000083688654,0.039738398,0.9505452,0.000029879091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0229467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05320495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0229467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003584333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001564616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045626283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105107444","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000161","title":"The Legacy of Historical Conflict: Evidence from Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Colonialism; Identity (music); Ethnic conflict; Empirical evidence; Ethnic group; Political economy; Political science; Cultural conflict; Conflict resolution research; Development economics; Sociology; Conflict resolution; Social science; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07766643273799952,"score_gpt":0.3660980161890232,"score_spread":0.2884315834510237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105107444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583052,0.032779727,0.0002868114,0.0006926408,0.000035907728,0.000015554535,0.00045365636,0.0000014430531,0.0074290945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791486,0.02006204,0.0001389249,0.00009505204,0.000044371278,0.000009819252,0.00028152947,0.0000024905073,0.00021717846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985435,0.0007658474,0.00011563471,0.00020443827,0.00016240326,0.00020824891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989312,0.0046154386,0.0041302256,0.00048573234,0.0011026087,0.00035403387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025372477,0.00023967064,0.00037583697,0.0034154158,0.0012049054,0.0014801725,0.00045218543,0.00034792113,0.0016974509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011214948,0.00024227626,0.0001871671,0.007343588,0.0017319188,0.0011471813,0.0015141417,0.0005175183,0.00016295395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028380973,0.000080805956,0.8772401,0.001431562,0.0006633046,0.001485032,0.032735363,0.0003304833,0.0005911025,0.005929117,0.0028265363,0.07640271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112663865,0.00006613475,0.9557343,0.0010139047,0.00013456127,0.0008978026,0.024838347,0.00009637768,0.00019966661,0.00049099553,0.016501201,0.000015617383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019153414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029683545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019153414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059617875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058735174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03808385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107758351","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000421","title":"On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Nationalism; Democracy; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.05263516533756687,"score_gpt":0.3802951089819447,"score_spread":0.32765994364437784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107758351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06215762,0.23385422,0.0072174007,0.20217732,0.0016501993,0.000023582857,0.000050524104,0.000019558373,0.49284962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968044,0.06377092,0.0013066774,0.014467538,0.0011747576,0.00004693953,0.000047022957,0.000028614502,0.022353087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974125,0.0017892426,0.00005120322,0.00019571939,0.00034503773,0.00020628191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997255,0.0018868374,0.0002157477,0.00017383596,0.00026739077,0.00020122137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003136872,0.00014598711,0.000587021,0.0011423755,0.003851505,0.0033046172,0.0006771313,0.0027639857,0.003679334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051154713,0.00014153006,0.00019658261,0.0016020797,0.022528786,0.01045627,0.0035461867,0.0038321193,0.0003966368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006801933,0.0000056813587,0.0002296913,0.000055114557,0.000002999936,0.00006544122,0.0024137748,0.00009606357,0.000015637728,0.9779847,0.0054485756,0.013675567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006983818,0.000006647325,0.0008144628,0.0003441707,0.0000039689508,0.00014470883,0.0047371723,0.00010944113,0.00004211974,0.89256674,0.101215884,0.000007799219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006361385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010263893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006361385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036336225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029469107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109307809","doi":"10.1017/s0003055409990219","title":"Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.07496121552790794,"score_gpt":0.2929875802133446,"score_spread":0.21802636468543665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109307809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96869653,0.0018547329,0.005732827,0.003216812,0.000047263646,0.00005484781,0.005621587,0.000038852955,0.014736553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616075,0.00045592658,0.00047399462,0.00032278342,0.000030537984,0.000030381903,0.0014535716,0.000007418091,0.0010646211],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996557,0.0021712845,0.00021287936,0.00051248545,0.00024931235,0.0002970559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9061674,0.053734057,0.029753478,0.00658796,0.0026075311,0.0011495897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005735452,0.00020107988,0.000720779,0.0008953716,0.00096563954,0.0015695856,0.0005445723,0.00080271286,0.0112674115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026573008,0.00034287348,0.00043177907,0.0022002053,0.0010230815,0.0013215748,0.0006954488,0.0012096006,0.0016640692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047782948,0.00015184657,0.94754505,0.0002634093,0.000633533,0.00021892949,0.0016499422,0.0033298102,0.0003387892,0.009696342,0.01038526,0.025309172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022127508,0.00014551014,0.95387137,0.00020772165,0.00041475805,0.0001969815,0.003141064,0.008196279,0.001130357,0.01503269,0.017351856,0.00009025164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013580611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020075405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013580611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043531987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003170599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037693262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110472666","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406232568","title":"<b>2. Douglas A. Hibbs, Jr. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.”</b><b><i>American Political Science Review</i></b><b>71 (December): 1467–1487</b> Cited 492 times.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015124122548526,"score_gpt":0.2808724454544194,"score_spread":0.2657483229058934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110472666","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051415805,0.5678631,0.001452768,0.30509093,0.047116823,0.000082512386,0.007157779,0.00011904628,0.07060288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017248588,0.71477157,0.0020648984,0.112278424,0.04997075,0.00042712202,0.006392034,0.00028815027,0.09655845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737144,0.00057407015,0.00033239176,0.00029560857,0.0011389952,0.00028745594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797197,0.009086963,0.0017860524,0.0004750719,0.008540218,0.00039190234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030817578,0.0013109142,0.0013391172,0.006611157,0.001757162,0.0031703492,0.001992522,0.0048915506,0.03621854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016809808,0.0007315581,0.0010146927,0.012214701,0.001774763,0.0044520176,0.001361293,0.0052296626,0.03736146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017178734,0.000008961856,0.00040918845,0.0005096344,0.000012826583,0.000037645998,0.00006844522,0.000041369785,0.000026583431,0.0057866983,0.97892374,0.014157678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016472217,0.000010587003,0.004818497,0.0014033637,0.000031243046,0.00009882465,0.00009075105,0.000057741505,0.00011683109,0.0047861957,0.9885511,0.00001846637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06402378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07946922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9637815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037408345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005318611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12730229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112477729","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000276","title":"The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Law; Political science; Value (mathematics); Politics; International law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.019007751711571905,"score_gpt":0.3103780644785184,"score_spread":0.29137031276694647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112477729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42245802,0.012928459,0.17901249,0.10108531,0.00043469964,0.0002601854,0.0009285043,0.0000924581,0.28279987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881571,0.0024316865,0.005742993,0.0007406711,0.0003662094,0.000084018364,0.00006636398,0.00001460746,0.002396374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543285,0.003050918,0.00013585595,0.00060874043,0.0005153779,0.0002563046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9319218,0.059290037,0.0049796663,0.0012701061,0.0013158994,0.0012225725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009082736,0.0003777526,0.00080768444,0.0046999333,0.0048912973,0.006590827,0.0010792639,0.0036575086,0.009799994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029487288,0.00043837389,0.0008059765,0.0096366415,0.01444524,0.013781106,0.004620031,0.002555629,0.00036707896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027113361,0.000038927392,0.010240858,0.000068035886,0.000051295094,0.00018319045,0.004114147,0.0018621676,0.00008218655,0.96714103,0.0016306601,0.014560394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040320654,0.000051668572,0.014251078,0.00024023683,0.00009889425,0.00027743276,0.006025976,0.01754365,0.000094218616,0.9440869,0.017244134,0.000045401397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075560003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008629814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009799994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004368262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016000546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048034668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114736693","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000098","title":"Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Glory; Ideology; Power (physics); Selfishness; Subversion; Meaning (existential); Anger; Contempt; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.11328378253127572,"score_gpt":0.3062589685639798,"score_spread":0.1929751860327041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114736693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017531512,0.022651467,0.039023694,0.07876977,0.0018421418,0.00007502359,0.00011320568,0.00003289199,0.8399602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91950154,0.010474266,0.0052139447,0.009700212,0.0033453412,0.00022070485,0.000083395076,0.000077620745,0.0513829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511564,0.0028526746,0.00014304579,0.0004856725,0.000855733,0.0005471966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355984,0.004859442,0.0004112964,0.00038723488,0.0005114871,0.000270685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007346456,0.00064539857,0.0007082492,0.0034054061,0.006922013,0.007776745,0.0013839726,0.005624779,0.010340003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009140992,0.00044919513,0.0007615344,0.0026313723,0.03699391,0.012820604,0.0048893504,0.007343633,0.0014898522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023102232,0.0000028433526,0.000036876005,0.000008465851,0.0000013811532,0.000018344841,0.00065694435,0.000055325505,0.000005105754,0.99752563,0.000992793,0.00069399923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007914159,0.0000028512309,0.00006367147,0.000039814426,0.0000020197942,0.000021676167,0.00050039333,0.000113366244,0.000015552436,0.98026526,0.01896493,0.0000027179979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028533386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023647365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010340003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007108494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028304213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05157596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117267371","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402254337","title":"Cycling into Saigon: The Conservative Transition in Ontario By David R. Cameron and Graham White. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2000. 224p. $75.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Presidential system; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Transition (genetics); Political economy; General election; White (mutation); Law; Public administration; Economic history; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.015167141697150029,"score_gpt":0.2488281654350935,"score_spread":0.23366102373794348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117267371","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009281656,0.811274,0.00020125958,0.116954505,0.0030791396,0.00007043611,0.00092495047,0.000034050056,0.058179967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12099719,0.58718807,0.0006234834,0.013566426,0.0013587803,0.00009381554,0.001034072,0.00009378271,0.27504438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995353,0.00006856961,0.00001336927,0.00005199068,0.00017518163,0.0001556801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996487,0.000057095196,0.000048973692,0.000007744021,0.00009646863,0.0001409792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000813159,0.0007542274,0.00042338096,0.0016932727,0.0068860436,0.0027095038,0.0010890078,0.001814,0.010853122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091391505,0.0005163296,0.0002654367,0.0058254553,0.0038117573,0.0023158719,0.0015093761,0.0015560433,0.0017671089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005701071,0.00002925199,0.0039206403,0.0007508965,0.000012599135,0.00035447846,0.030365698,0.00011326878,0.00019015845,0.012500332,0.8664064,0.085299276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006074351,0.000006595872,0.017488996,0.0004268339,0.000008055784,0.00010548324,0.00933396,0.000020454923,0.00003640737,0.0008414234,0.9717129,0.000012843958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9727548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99490535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050992545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050992545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036754284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36997855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117882486","doi":"10.1017/s0003055405051488","title":"Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Epistemology; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Sociology; Popular sovereignty; Solidarity; Collective identity; Impossibility; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04193930035387955,"score_gpt":0.4101236277089392,"score_spread":0.3681843273550596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117882486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03490473,0.053040206,0.010354403,0.18899351,0.0016831323,0.000023409542,0.00005146263,0.000040376417,0.7109088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9123057,0.03186811,0.001747722,0.01878567,0.002040996,0.00008002314,0.00006847674,0.000056809444,0.03304649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996591,0.0014752126,0.00008501057,0.00056137197,0.00082014507,0.0004673001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965546,0.0020186647,0.00025510113,0.00047282956,0.00046590585,0.00023292749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048022056,0.00035243994,0.00084669236,0.0014957108,0.0045574913,0.0068542087,0.0010108579,0.0039857286,0.008914408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004556652,0.00023668354,0.00066122407,0.0015994505,0.030375905,0.014633453,0.005530091,0.004838163,0.0012309438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007804195,0.0000065845516,0.00010673639,0.000038468035,0.000005964268,0.000053332915,0.0013976604,0.00004671469,0.0000351326,0.99045944,0.002286812,0.0055553266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010944173,0.000018537758,0.0011452843,0.00032111251,0.0000147391065,0.00009360052,0.003916229,0.00012961666,0.00013493883,0.8658468,0.12835865,0.000009375253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003404759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031245232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008914408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004246373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036584523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0308097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118437808","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000323","title":"Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Empowerment; Monopoly; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08701216007564758,"score_gpt":0.38699927196619727,"score_spread":0.2999871118905497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118437808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043427072,0.0051818457,0.19080052,0.08495864,0.0014797555,0.00015124369,0.000080646605,0.00008740718,0.6738329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548257,0.0015964254,0.014911632,0.00532561,0.0008427371,0.00018193792,0.000049591094,0.00005268563,0.022213563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888049,0.0074115987,0.00028249994,0.0013274888,0.0011403328,0.001033186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921211,0.004823605,0.0007245776,0.0009958459,0.00063975947,0.000695241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014030958,0.00045458128,0.0005993893,0.0012965903,0.005563081,0.0062347767,0.001126457,0.0034832077,0.0065832636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011253487,0.00031073255,0.0007084143,0.0011011139,0.043487847,0.011574842,0.0069186934,0.005749273,0.0008631669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005779147,0.000007616865,0.00014518974,0.000013417686,0.0000015684851,0.000019494208,0.00086091185,0.00020318101,0.0000212479,0.99510264,0.00066111656,0.0029578526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009737552,0.000009291585,0.00013274892,0.000034132823,0.0000021806839,0.000026137095,0.00037682292,0.0005318851,0.000051175804,0.98400235,0.014817788,0.000005778246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010925708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011762824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014030958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031658646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026719244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07420373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119620190","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402210461","title":"More Than a Historian: The Political and Economic Thought of Charles A. Beard By Clyde W. Barrow. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2000. 289p. $39.95.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitution; Database transaction; Interpretation (philosophy); History of political thought; History; Classics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Political philosophy","score_opus":0.026418336589369602,"score_gpt":0.2517636718962875,"score_spread":0.22534533530691792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119620190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002429211,0.8697628,0.0005714677,0.0845367,0.0060521876,0.000011849935,0.00010996948,0.00004474256,0.038667474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01331607,0.7036595,0.0017364159,0.027030442,0.006923961,0.000063109066,0.00024113494,0.00014040121,0.24688898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994165,0.00015169477,0.000021783828,0.00009956889,0.0002648663,0.0000455857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989446,0.000469621,0.000098279525,0.000040909264,0.00023873716,0.0002078957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009838969,0.0010552659,0.0007088941,0.0024519267,0.0020213865,0.0037337774,0.00083924434,0.0020498547,0.03142369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033005804,0.00068152597,0.00027687708,0.004638591,0.0022569976,0.006629691,0.0015999821,0.003870643,0.012387138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095302985,0.000008988923,0.00010614174,0.0001010687,0.000003877789,0.000024447478,0.00025166158,0.000025706055,0.00003188248,0.006965468,0.9589439,0.03352733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031326526,0.0000036533963,0.0004211192,0.0004861656,0.0000034553793,0.000060908988,0.00024986433,0.000025393116,0.000023841229,0.0050439597,0.99367285,0.000005677713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032525033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050042555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032525033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034683545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003390336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105122685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122361107","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000559","title":"Coercion and (Global) Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Economic Justice; Socioeconomic status; Global justice; Law and economics; State (computer science); Function (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.11823770859144936,"score_gpt":0.42605502528540157,"score_spread":0.3078173166939522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122361107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06486351,0.007421259,0.07468819,0.038592298,0.00058121164,0.00011797991,0.000082915874,0.000092969385,0.8135598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780724,0.0014998623,0.0037409693,0.0035109087,0.00036439355,0.00011952866,0.000024334931,0.00003426007,0.012633391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917978,0.0036634502,0.00033161312,0.0012299796,0.001989937,0.0009872001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946925,0.0029120445,0.00061087817,0.00091526925,0.0006087856,0.00026047186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006185599,0.0003653395,0.000664606,0.0012206592,0.0030244126,0.0045522377,0.00086551823,0.002578167,0.005460489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00877316,0.00019620809,0.0005459816,0.0011194417,0.025887849,0.0056876247,0.0067672064,0.0036847638,0.00040995318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002317967,0.0000023960492,0.0001766448,0.00001575361,0.000004910498,0.000026585827,0.0005150675,0.000119946344,0.000037722424,0.99691224,0.00030162156,0.001884718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075608014,0.000009923483,0.00065081875,0.000081934275,0.000008591164,0.00006512111,0.0005853538,0.00028030353,0.00011202795,0.9733261,0.02486457,0.0000076543765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024481358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024755453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006185599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025913613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024062286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032712996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126616776","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401242026","title":"The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. By Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1998. 322p. $90.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Simple (philosophy); Presidential election; Power (physics); Phenomenon; Presidential system; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029619014260147694,"score_gpt":0.2798716266999759,"score_spread":0.2502526124398282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126616776","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025487863,0.88182515,0.02683365,0.04460879,0.0024695827,0.00008820134,0.0007169832,0.00019640676,0.040712394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1434436,0.76240236,0.034118436,0.010728422,0.004896514,0.00071219984,0.0011571273,0.00035515352,0.042186197],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918035,0.004571463,0.00055388553,0.0010745326,0.0017405918,0.00025596842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806533,0.01565949,0.0012059462,0.00095807656,0.0012024997,0.00032076583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013532251,0.0026242938,0.0028606115,0.0061154207,0.0013921281,0.006570842,0.0029057015,0.0044649853,0.017753778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04033859,0.002623177,0.00089533627,0.01384277,0.0159728,0.015504631,0.004670803,0.00403672,0.0075665955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010919534,0.00008446826,0.0050464985,0.0019801545,0.00021300407,0.000110795976,0.002306033,0.0022306833,0.00022127233,0.19202968,0.29399884,0.50166935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041511496,0.00007325402,0.009558696,0.002697593,0.000078784906,0.00042763405,0.0016232041,0.0023992832,0.00017266381,0.73109704,0.2517362,0.0000940864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011335211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011931026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017753778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037787042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018414143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071566224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130335340","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000134","title":"Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Incentive; Proportional representation; Legislature; Political science; Political economy; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Electoral reform; Competition (biology); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Market economy; Democracy","score_opus":0.03952988541395845,"score_gpt":0.4314517945858869,"score_spread":0.39192190917192843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130335340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7526672,0.0061482647,0.008421814,0.009464322,0.00010606637,0.00004959733,0.00011748417,0.000027348535,0.22299792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962291,0.0009084567,0.0003867233,0.00018376845,0.000035537563,0.000006846096,0.000014741819,0.0000072375556,0.002227629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972709,0.0016678707,0.000056981225,0.00026722986,0.00027085782,0.00046619444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973018,0.001553195,0.0004440429,0.00020902455,0.00025516876,0.00023680255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033758665,0.00012959956,0.00036845857,0.0011028575,0.0006907577,0.0022066778,0.00047529873,0.0006136692,0.00461078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007944546,0.00016266086,0.00026333096,0.0013081646,0.0032486492,0.0017044067,0.0012019416,0.0006156942,0.00036988148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045325325,0.000118030424,0.051960256,0.000282886,0.00019657063,0.0003458528,0.0028464263,0.005514856,0.0014247544,0.74144715,0.0049986453,0.19041131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020951734,0.00041271857,0.44524458,0.00033856026,0.00021767683,0.00074920716,0.0050780526,0.011603532,0.002765538,0.4279635,0.10531955,0.000097542084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003139481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004720676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00461078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023823518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005985156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017853558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131017438","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402304349","title":"Sanctions as Economic Statecraft: Theory and Practice. Edited bySteve Chan and A. Cooper Drury. New York: St Martin's, 2000. 258p. $75.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Craft; Sanctions; Sociology; History; Media studies; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.043655543031762334,"score_gpt":0.29850160272750415,"score_spread":0.2548460596957418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131017438","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023063784,0.67032516,0.010355375,0.06508652,0.0031117764,0.000049099493,0.00034853115,0.00022280883,0.24819444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16030213,0.69848096,0.0063216356,0.004719861,0.0033682466,0.00022979052,0.00026639673,0.0002512828,0.12605974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.00033329686,0.00004241041,0.00008729097,0.00020028416,0.000087444365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970048,0.0020076754,0.00033454844,0.00011893092,0.00032838632,0.00020565026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018558096,0.0011892748,0.0014273694,0.002507149,0.001785348,0.00825019,0.001336821,0.0035130237,0.027290206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059023723,0.0013395988,0.000441558,0.006238973,0.007302806,0.008076178,0.0019048713,0.003471164,0.005308475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019024339,0.000040991432,0.0005772452,0.00071685895,0.000028914026,0.00013799478,0.0021245745,0.0015928831,0.000048256567,0.541516,0.35671985,0.0964774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018491355,0.000015259218,0.0013760165,0.0020358183,0.000019330857,0.00021559403,0.002277684,0.00092249847,0.000045515135,0.43353572,0.5595117,0.000026363854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008948664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010843814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027290206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051804995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056640776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091294825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131379390","doi":"10.1017/s0003055403000649","title":"Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2353,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; State (computer science); Classics; Sociology; Humanities; Law; History; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05954364214638,"score_gpt":0.3570080009857252,"score_spread":0.2974643588393452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131379390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08335735,0.01122598,0.13192658,0.3915802,0.0023568708,0.000100428515,0.00031839157,0.00038052662,0.37875366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526858,0.0039405334,0.0149036255,0.007821455,0.00050322386,0.000101916725,0.00011750171,0.00016049524,0.019765403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996265,0.001760324,0.00012130388,0.00067857414,0.0005081609,0.00066666445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266195,0.0024289736,0.00095544406,0.001928902,0.001125878,0.0008989436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045896727,0.00022985162,0.00044250398,0.0014028302,0.0028951643,0.010799946,0.0012243766,0.001821711,0.005309903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01261666,0.0002518047,0.0004716644,0.0027616485,0.017177885,0.014319076,0.0041038855,0.0036647217,0.0005205753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063550706,0.0000027115664,0.00086657575,0.000030616688,0.0000052914597,0.000043438176,0.0031482528,0.00039156788,0.00006273312,0.97905433,0.005240934,0.011147329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072484663,0.000004962328,0.0019979617,0.0002720836,0.000011529487,0.000060624712,0.007241206,0.00131577,0.0001531406,0.89480215,0.0941177,0.00001560322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025255358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03284868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025255358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005645203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090286415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050216675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135628144","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402710368","title":"Multinational Democracies. Edited by Alain G. Gagnon and James Tully. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 428p. $70.00 cloth, $25.00 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Autocracy; Sociology; Political economy; Media studies; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.01636940301766147,"score_gpt":0.2849336848145528,"score_spread":0.2685642817968913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135628144","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085912755,0.8944593,0.0012905657,0.016085515,0.004202381,0.00002281285,0.0012281426,0.0002260168,0.081626184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02037268,0.72655827,0.0041662427,0.0034170893,0.0024544536,0.00013393407,0.0019466107,0.00038905343,0.24056172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997181,0.00006388962,0.000029543631,0.000047413127,0.00010734126,0.000033663007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994295,0.00020958138,0.0000783794,0.000052190182,0.00016564902,0.00006472498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007534419,0.001966157,0.001253418,0.0024525798,0.0010264424,0.002390648,0.0010933612,0.0017002521,0.037692666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016712697,0.001592368,0.00050471706,0.0048103943,0.0012878113,0.0036751914,0.0012293608,0.0021326747,0.016374353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022892067,0.000027694805,0.00043977794,0.00045495472,0.000022370625,0.00006578718,0.00050705846,0.00037997143,0.00011387544,0.021415437,0.8572325,0.11931769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009526042,0.000008956538,0.0020333962,0.0009964986,0.00001011768,0.00015978326,0.0002535937,0.00014926298,0.000054840966,0.0147408,0.9815718,0.000011369377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029872503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078880124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037692666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002866935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030567904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12609452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136227760","doi":"10.1017/s000305540282024x","title":"The Search for Good Government: Understanding the Paradox of Italian Democracy. By Filippo Sabetti. Montreal: McGill–Queens University Press, 2000. 288p. $34.95.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Prosperity; Democracy; Political science; State (computer science); Institution; Sociology; Political economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04488011049146586,"score_gpt":0.3010722507663571,"score_spread":0.25619214027489123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136227760","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011431852,0.64486086,0.0005105018,0.22847578,0.0030668722,0.000018387944,0.00021654963,0.000093082665,0.121614784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090293065,0.6153831,0.0021129658,0.036823876,0.010564114,0.00016385724,0.0005458013,0.00032971337,0.24378353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996308,0.00012407191,0.0000108640315,0.00004781323,0.000089723035,0.00009674237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996265,0.00015307072,0.000055638062,0.000021859836,0.000059037324,0.00008390271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010118965,0.001425617,0.00052773266,0.0020075124,0.0027299358,0.0047749844,0.0015022518,0.0029678575,0.017543714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013935508,0.000842141,0.00044107717,0.0047059194,0.005304898,0.006366812,0.0021434114,0.003696813,0.005726855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001619172,0.000016844402,0.00025442868,0.00018920159,0.00000691674,0.000055943456,0.002233744,0.00014955178,0.00003175529,0.059817325,0.9047329,0.03249521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008385796,0.000004786301,0.0019645977,0.000541921,0.000004822152,0.00008833828,0.0011587589,0.00015323651,0.000021000058,0.030818623,0.96522385,0.000011641159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11668447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17232259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11668447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009447117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045789494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2320106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139127649","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402230245","title":"Rereading Power and Freedom in J. S. Mill. By Bruce Baum. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000. 360p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Liberalism; Individualism; Toleration; Power (physics); Sociology; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.014724528253477018,"score_gpt":0.29399732341769624,"score_spread":0.2792727951642192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139127649","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004682773,0.87567997,0.00074713625,0.08027586,0.006926494,0.000015595553,0.00019793572,0.00004152901,0.035647217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033880454,0.7239558,0.0016684727,0.027753951,0.008281486,0.00009404795,0.00035827656,0.00019622744,0.2038112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929595,0.00019686527,0.000038132675,0.00008916634,0.00028751063,0.00009229116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883944,0.0005500177,0.00011343022,0.00004602754,0.00025370833,0.0001973331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014304693,0.0020018017,0.0010277687,0.0033003103,0.0034398164,0.0048232307,0.0013131091,0.0029690121,0.013097039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028230182,0.0013167484,0.00042059107,0.006966484,0.0057878173,0.0066496083,0.0015077471,0.0038007316,0.0063483804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016232425,0.000009227901,0.0001181517,0.00022376566,0.000005571479,0.000055393753,0.0020581172,0.0000792396,0.000051148883,0.025046041,0.95017654,0.02216055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053574327,0.0000051888196,0.0008173349,0.0006720467,0.00000440795,0.000070495065,0.0015315891,0.000040687082,0.00004386394,0.014958816,0.9818394,0.000010765324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19493632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37873673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19493632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009570086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00840768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38760334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144662706","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401252010","title":"Public Integrity. By J. Patrick Dobel. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. 260p. $38.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Connotation; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Classification of discontinuities; Gerontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Art history; Art; Medicine; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06212971631764685,"score_gpt":0.3349809738248801,"score_spread":0.27285125750723327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144662706","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033156772,0.70314944,0.0010883275,0.06751209,0.009919276,0.00005000375,0.0011586435,0.0004770636,0.2163136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058480245,0.3446881,0.0011708298,0.012906842,0.003897241,0.00012858472,0.0009300427,0.00044947042,0.6299809],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935454,0.000120134515,0.00006233935,0.00011488991,0.00026170415,0.000086368964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989837,0.00034823685,0.00016444367,0.00007215625,0.00024852384,0.0001829095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247151,0.0022131756,0.0009178179,0.0028099434,0.0017343105,0.003697672,0.0013931858,0.0036348365,0.18088679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030025255,0.0015123491,0.0004191204,0.0038396902,0.0015213281,0.0082830945,0.002828308,0.0036949448,0.15484741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011369478,0.000007299249,0.000051905023,0.0001408251,0.0000022981405,0.000024209776,0.00010142884,0.00003684164,0.000029117164,0.0029119302,0.95822155,0.03846119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003913762,0.000004055051,0.00032954384,0.00041433534,0.0000024603223,0.00007136917,0.00015707352,0.000025297224,0.000018663555,0.002231387,0.99673635,0.0000055142436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013107928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026072605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18088679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021850627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027060374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6051266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145224084","doi":"10.1017/s0003055408080386","title":"What Is a “Right to Have Rights”? Three Images of the Politics of Human Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Autonomy; Politics; Law; Reading (process); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04291927670791675,"score_gpt":0.3806523311345332,"score_spread":0.33773305442661644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145224084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032921866,0.010036411,0.02643168,0.2554065,0.0009455907,0.000027524335,0.000059547496,0.00003450278,0.67413646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656632,0.0040736347,0.004265649,0.0097904345,0.00055963785,0.000059897993,0.000024460951,0.00003040443,0.015532634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99148506,0.005201623,0.00013926192,0.000501776,0.0020613892,0.0006109156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967804,0.0020527395,0.00027321273,0.00030997404,0.00033185186,0.00025182383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069049727,0.00042991832,0.00042383,0.0016141466,0.0043926574,0.008550169,0.0009644667,0.005117877,0.0033887723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064961766,0.0002722221,0.00042789915,0.0014625876,0.0575054,0.012097684,0.00372711,0.007320872,0.00036074768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031623806,0.0000028185066,0.000029356155,0.0000070516207,8.286259e-7,0.000010216343,0.0015940783,0.000028264027,0.000032547923,0.996302,0.00078421575,0.0012055057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008814877,0.000010004829,0.00030216677,0.00008914401,0.000003529889,0.00006166575,0.004432105,0.00021676678,0.00014989144,0.9299759,0.06473903,0.000011089173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003917608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031098847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008550169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005376838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029258805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039011836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146825456","doi":"10.1017/s000305540139202x","title":"Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison. By Ann Chih Lin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 213p. $39.50.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Penology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Prison; Annals; Political science; State (computer science); Public administration; Population; Recidivism; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political economy; History; Demography; Classics","score_opus":0.02554136680226784,"score_gpt":0.3981146784737029,"score_spread":0.3725733116714351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146825456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088703266,0.6095944,0.0006470327,0.30204698,0.004538319,0.000037550497,0.00013026896,0.00009589761,0.08202245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07832476,0.6759984,0.0020670746,0.041073907,0.006738768,0.0003741543,0.00026115173,0.00016875291,0.19499303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990621,0.0005218864,0.00003402763,0.00005500049,0.00018098732,0.00014587997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988381,0.00059292995,0.0001337039,0.00004400358,0.0001244025,0.00026677063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018420122,0.0011678599,0.00040059217,0.001317954,0.0028968097,0.0039047382,0.0010205839,0.0047033005,0.023826765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041837436,0.00072876783,0.00030904645,0.0018599719,0.0048307143,0.0066759065,0.002621674,0.004478875,0.0050276173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800665,0.000031776246,0.00021722996,0.00034173258,0.00000947399,0.00005498093,0.0010871051,0.00021848067,0.00004345071,0.038740903,0.8843142,0.07492263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029701598,0.00003320301,0.0038993955,0.0026592838,0.000014974635,0.00011154454,0.0034573134,0.00048257323,0.00007477784,0.07486183,0.9143487,0.000026654116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039460033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09393775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039460033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065110484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065526576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07970852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151241261","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000080","title":"Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Delegation; Political science; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Public administration; Negotiation; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.031130516331031925,"score_gpt":0.36840268626737305,"score_spread":0.3372721699363411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151241261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96461403,0.00035661506,0.0018906152,0.0005809909,0.000007689189,0.000010123726,0.000032796303,0.000008998905,0.03249808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689627,0.00007118104,0.00022181658,0.000022487595,0.00000826115,0.000005320813,0.000023770306,0.0000042661077,0.002746469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963381,0.00153938,0.00013900954,0.00032350846,0.0008316197,0.00082837517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973145,0.0009982473,0.00082168967,0.00021229501,0.00026103546,0.00039216757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002063625,0.000116298,0.0004138099,0.0015230539,0.0029967085,0.0027512056,0.00038873404,0.0005728056,0.0052555273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066102184,0.00019704424,0.00021187445,0.0023392555,0.002917138,0.0010024227,0.002043243,0.0005922867,0.00064522016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012395463,0.00027797229,0.29776177,0.00026360867,0.00012508174,0.0011514539,0.06814928,0.005818817,0.009454089,0.40861195,0.0038136593,0.20333281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065784996,0.00021152021,0.85090655,0.000081601596,0.000033189277,0.00042497672,0.021471558,0.004528615,0.00074149494,0.07796561,0.043511443,0.000057572128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019095207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0512852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019095207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032274828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011906384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03796816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152177377","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000094","title":"Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":282,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Ethics of care; Diversity (politics); Feminist ethics; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.07308542215743548,"score_gpt":0.4158490771869438,"score_spread":0.34276365502950834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152177377","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051797736,0.03711287,0.31184208,0.40267926,0.0035242941,0.00023135004,0.00010823022,0.00017636812,0.19252788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.890443,0.011678972,0.075414434,0.0147683555,0.0020021081,0.0005589131,0.00007972444,0.00022240818,0.0048321346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92598027,0.061855495,0.0013420258,0.0027871458,0.0060932706,0.0019417818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90673155,0.07549012,0.0031946208,0.006883499,0.0053873356,0.002312876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08659935,0.0014899386,0.0023125394,0.009093674,0.016163873,0.033707302,0.0055232164,0.008138058,0.0048956303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047923975,0.0009850328,0.0014326192,0.0057869423,0.1907068,0.0632746,0.036005657,0.018276403,0.0006185695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000978647,0.000009980672,0.00026460155,0.000075563476,0.000009116255,0.00005987832,0.026883366,0.00010848708,0.000033714245,0.96596676,0.00077903847,0.005799733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007834359,0.000011154787,0.00014835651,0.0003215086,0.000009421012,0.000063414234,0.022512993,0.0003601814,0.00006649337,0.9475912,0.028894825,0.000012672497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004159551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005932253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08659935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013494182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016978512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4579866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159810407","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406062095","title":"Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems: Party, Posts, and Zombie Politicians in Japan","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Incentive; Zombie; Parliament; Reputation; Proportional representation; Single non-transferable vote; Single-member district; Business; Representation (politics); Lower house; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Law; Market economy; Politics; General election; Split-ticket voting; Computer security; Democracy","score_opus":0.02530880291844293,"score_gpt":0.3707189439551659,"score_spread":0.34541014103672296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159810407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998367,0.000055306682,0.00013913993,0.00006294807,0.0000017989498,0.00000525362,0.0000237529,0.0000015994667,0.0013431489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935704,0.000032560947,0.00010106337,0.000009680183,0.0000033082238,0.0000054085704,0.000029663453,0.0000011276572,0.0004601928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989385,0.0003418903,0.000065477674,0.00012851525,0.0001338725,0.00039170243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983839,0.00032591575,0.00055957056,0.000071559516,0.0002448611,0.00041423787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013960047,0.00013218344,0.0005620045,0.0018858569,0.0014600354,0.0016183509,0.0002699474,0.0003359005,0.0029921988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003511904,0.00021077531,0.00031266233,0.0014982226,0.000978992,0.00061303587,0.0015753118,0.00026603998,0.00019577976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010522369,0.00023527365,0.91867954,0.0001463653,0.00019688957,0.00073327863,0.005323618,0.0041421414,0.0054984177,0.032422096,0.0009425334,0.030627625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056231736,0.00013036234,0.98422295,0.000013552856,0.00009443538,0.00009133843,0.0041192663,0.0061192936,0.00045219486,0.0023287812,0.0023455245,0.000026068961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020777965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05146093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020777965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00191369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010683333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041314065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160608470","doi":"10.1017/s000305540221432x","title":"Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries: The Role of Scientists in the U.S. Acid Rain Debate. By Leslie R. Alm. Westport, CT: Praeger. 2000. 160p. $58.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Science and Climate Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acid rain; Political science; Science policy; Focus (optics); Process (computing); Environmental policy; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.015017514078191033,"score_gpt":0.30847684659742763,"score_spread":0.2934593325192366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160608470","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008485044,0.6453639,0.0003502014,0.30745053,0.0048156236,0.000015690299,0.000055465687,0.000029856392,0.041070227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07285068,0.6398068,0.0022339434,0.10910025,0.007740488,0.00012970742,0.00017930257,0.00010899609,0.16784981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979874,0.0010673788,0.000059438153,0.00014159767,0.0005188927,0.00022524632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976599,0.0013132925,0.00019708952,0.00005253849,0.00042089252,0.00035631494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033640123,0.000780014,0.00062143966,0.0014248196,0.006179247,0.006460042,0.0011110578,0.0053175846,0.00970043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006514529,0.00082442083,0.0003746536,0.0038284005,0.0074775647,0.010491991,0.0030516144,0.0051669762,0.0031275144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024187057,0.00001114573,0.00027089755,0.00022753266,0.000007269007,0.00006672301,0.0030124758,0.00006237862,0.00004547872,0.032721844,0.9296002,0.033949856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011463401,0.000009411514,0.00090940495,0.00081987877,0.0000063805996,0.0000441508,0.005110931,0.000044961096,0.000028738736,0.03148511,0.9615194,0.000010190083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06945297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15747568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070256703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010675124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1380974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168663113","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401742025","title":"The Geography of Money. By Benjamin J. Cohen. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1998. 229p. $37.50 cloth, $17.95 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Restructuring; Politics; Function (biology); Style (visual arts); Economic history; Political economy; Political science; Economics; History; Law","score_opus":0.014684914793742655,"score_gpt":0.22659611737425722,"score_spread":0.21191120258051457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168663113","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048485407,0.8548217,0.0014231097,0.037967093,0.004117508,0.000020611671,0.001014681,0.00021037723,0.099940106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023749262,0.72073793,0.0036052342,0.008952157,0.0044185356,0.00014678728,0.0010919936,0.00041570197,0.2368824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964106,0.00006890214,0.000032052187,0.00007129831,0.00014464128,0.0000419758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999265,0.00027680089,0.00011916723,0.000056666788,0.00019148766,0.00009099468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054454274,0.001694346,0.0010202505,0.0034318473,0.0012699122,0.0036758936,0.0011457136,0.0021041427,0.028928224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023349614,0.0013675068,0.00052740047,0.00625937,0.0033798537,0.0068576597,0.0014228325,0.0027199076,0.021425687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016730815,0.000009221623,0.0002767007,0.00032572742,0.000011563176,0.000051970048,0.00041289272,0.00015697023,0.00006881492,0.025690522,0.9180371,0.054941837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000704566,0.0000054398756,0.0013063967,0.00059788127,0.0000067774054,0.00014621235,0.0004100028,0.000062476145,0.000030283749,0.023920538,0.97349584,0.000011065346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02773659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047444165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028928224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034022795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029590437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09677452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187082881","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000241","title":"The Primary Effect: Preference Votes and Political Promotions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Primary election; Politics; Exploit; Political science; Regression discontinuity design; Analogy; Competence (human resources); Microeconomics; General election; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Statistics","score_opus":0.04284344300457281,"score_gpt":0.3836081709961832,"score_spread":0.3407647279916104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187082881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596957,0.0015659474,0.01020901,0.0017306006,0.00014439445,0.00019831474,0.0017094861,0.00013453192,0.024612091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949851,0.00012958622,0.00047256102,0.000079905985,0.00006981412,0.00003488747,0.00022257217,0.000010476467,0.0039948993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593914,0.0016660342,0.00020386599,0.0007267371,0.00055874756,0.0009055825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683843,0.020223707,0.0052982876,0.0022719211,0.0009875417,0.0028341548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050359913,0.0003943122,0.0011959688,0.0013658961,0.000705221,0.0019452753,0.0008028215,0.0011909197,0.03331035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02052914,0.00027746058,0.0016424154,0.0011801488,0.0012704101,0.0011143564,0.001966347,0.0021542911,0.0013925737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003312403,0.0009268413,0.9043948,0.0007071003,0.0012780424,0.00043563562,0.0014814188,0.0029019655,0.0021423849,0.034648985,0.0030809136,0.044689424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028743333,0.0016174905,0.9685546,0.000106049345,0.00073478866,0.00026983148,0.0011595817,0.003917987,0.0012793781,0.014750013,0.007286858,0.000035987447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002804248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029939988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03331035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053128024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070126593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11143422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203970239","doi":"10.2307/2586231","title":"The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions. By J. W. Tubbs. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. 253p. $42.50.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013905505361678217,"score_gpt":0.29971205071297474,"score_spread":0.2858065453512965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203970239","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021194532,0.8625543,0.0014893262,0.07829913,0.0012488256,0.000008124577,0.00010270815,0.000026980893,0.054151174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23458849,0.6915632,0.002527912,0.011942122,0.0047454434,0.00007440284,0.00020535271,0.00009864618,0.054254394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.00028313493,0.00003398804,0.0000733416,0.00014364121,0.0000652137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849355,0.0009415454,0.00017420645,0.000086434324,0.00016826652,0.00013585867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015511948,0.0007409207,0.0004951065,0.0030098981,0.00227264,0.0038245707,0.0009912045,0.0027605756,0.009625157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004598855,0.0008493703,0.00026541826,0.0033246882,0.014446194,0.012165883,0.0016952318,0.0034759603,0.0018286451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007072095,0.000041281073,0.000888286,0.0005757328,0.000032237538,0.00018492744,0.010891014,0.00030121897,0.00013294251,0.595227,0.28449437,0.10716019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012956058,0.000015970516,0.0041616457,0.0013758233,0.000015453106,0.00030310487,0.0028984058,0.0001350669,0.00007095614,0.5418578,0.44913575,0.000017028144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013645265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024101788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013645265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004289517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020933005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032199383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255458947","doi":"10.1017/s0003055415000453","title":"Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process tracing; Causal inference; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Process (computing); Econometrics; Management science; Bayesian inference; Qualitative property; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Data science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.29580603943462885,"score_gpt":0.6121796969617302,"score_spread":0.3163736575271014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255458947","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000558911,0.00047797777,0.9969874,0.0005720893,0.00002929312,0.000101210615,0.000057620797,0.00005060495,0.0011647806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038103525,0.0011134978,0.95736736,0.00039318888,0.000205378,0.0012262004,0.00015833102,0.00008526962,0.0013473361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95189244,0.040023476,0.0012147105,0.0031125695,0.003299914,0.0004568756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8496546,0.13531564,0.0035013736,0.0063530123,0.004330255,0.00084504066],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06886626,0.001968375,0.0030036645,0.007002688,0.0021053797,0.0056623966,0.0053534433,0.0035284646,0.008055024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14293966,0.0023440276,0.003002888,0.005642377,0.004872057,0.007046459,0.005868075,0.00618773,0.0011939143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037833004,0.00006202609,0.0014236204,0.00038808852,0.00035109292,0.00007658915,0.00081528845,0.03453847,0.00021867525,0.88364947,0.00197111,0.07646783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003189191,0.00002974712,0.00032176776,0.00018395635,0.00005760726,0.000057503083,0.000087198154,0.091705546,0.00015395317,0.90013516,0.007199415,0.00003631391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052332305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063483925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93113375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035917761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004490786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36420393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275893291","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401822012","title":"The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century. By Robert Gilpin, with the assistance of Jean Millis Gilpin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 373p. $29.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Globalization, Economics, and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Capitalism; Investment (military); World economy; Political science; Economic history; Economy; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01283131898038875,"score_gpt":0.23208920207224723,"score_spread":0.21925788309185848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275893291","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000116154195,0.90641224,0.00044277083,0.068922736,0.0072630346,0.000013941209,0.000165323,0.000086568674,0.016577194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007345165,0.8607343,0.001564686,0.019936377,0.011942876,0.00008743154,0.00036445775,0.00017778378,0.0978469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994593,0.00016262353,0.000031920696,0.00009602991,0.00017961294,0.00007045122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904627,0.00044219155,0.000115855124,0.000041974872,0.00016611251,0.00018758877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001510266,0.00395119,0.0013806053,0.0036093346,0.0019282959,0.0052061765,0.0017093836,0.00454639,0.027996898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028994705,0.0011535056,0.00066494173,0.0053489152,0.0037315856,0.011258321,0.0040061376,0.006210335,0.017920172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009233478,0.000008076689,0.00008316021,0.00020428293,0.000008459487,0.000028523935,0.0002323705,0.00006385943,0.000023220178,0.006135822,0.9646332,0.028569676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009104711,0.000008476381,0.00077145064,0.0011788952,0.00000953345,0.00012988951,0.00058106834,0.0001247371,0.000029426743,0.020001486,0.9771402,0.000015686586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017085165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03498116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027996898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031139038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029787987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093658924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277291112","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401732017","title":"Feminists and Party Politics. By Lisa Young. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2000. 227p. $75.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Feminism; Gender studies; Bridge (graph theory); Political science; Comparative politics; Regionalism (politics); Element (criminal law); Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.016937218601069066,"score_gpt":0.2994731025484096,"score_spread":0.2825358839473405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277291112","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007609319,0.75994134,0.0003735667,0.013761435,0.0023396085,0.000024596617,0.0014519759,0.00013633996,0.2212102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010311501,0.34586883,0.0006574901,0.003250093,0.000736241,0.00006716178,0.001049928,0.00016220564,0.6378965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961495,0.00005747952,0.00001708193,0.000041335254,0.00020059932,0.000068576635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950266,0.00014771125,0.000051745264,0.00003120706,0.00016447513,0.000102269376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051709573,0.0011410828,0.0007762778,0.002240237,0.0023817546,0.0032339739,0.00097237754,0.0017705712,0.085585415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012577095,0.001234699,0.0003040014,0.0076771528,0.0016424725,0.0021925368,0.0012417944,0.0020671152,0.04472796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016244569,0.000011180444,0.00035062345,0.00031438196,0.00000564411,0.00005351123,0.0005037252,0.00009696011,0.00008387142,0.004158643,0.8964507,0.09795445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034696347,0.0000028129273,0.0022071227,0.0006426628,0.000004128112,0.00006283467,0.00050389575,0.00002723497,0.000025596135,0.0015987124,0.9949161,0.0000054370653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33630463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6949288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33630463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007782215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006844886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66869426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281194592","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401912018","title":"Globalizing Concern for Women’s Human Rights: The Failure of the American Model. By Diana G. Zoelle. New York: St. Martin’s, 2000. 169p. $49.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Human rights; Panacea (medicine); Convention; Multinational corporation; Democracy; Ideology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03752125067306954,"score_gpt":0.3422662927023365,"score_spread":0.30474504202926694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281194592","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029096502,0.74060076,0.00024743256,0.2173271,0.0044689137,0.000009717198,0.00006618321,0.00003494428,0.03695399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018670365,0.7433911,0.0009547536,0.08422221,0.0068162763,0.000099272285,0.00013719145,0.00013244693,0.14557636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932563,0.00023426628,0.000023465254,0.000099687335,0.00021558026,0.00010138764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922574,0.0003843545,0.00008436065,0.000033427437,0.00012493476,0.00014713193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00151136,0.0014231638,0.00054669584,0.0015503768,0.0022180902,0.003973432,0.0009812219,0.004165224,0.022927485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024278897,0.00063852774,0.0003263107,0.0024705564,0.0053590396,0.007919885,0.0027215222,0.00536582,0.008360311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010389912,0.000012215089,0.00012937862,0.00015330662,0.0000049435293,0.000022305885,0.0007611851,0.0000291006,0.0000358762,0.025647243,0.93336034,0.03983376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006534067,0.000006569914,0.000795645,0.0005659044,0.0000039227457,0.000055304787,0.0008607249,0.000028147962,0.000020275878,0.014585205,0.9830651,0.0000066032685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030604685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07974871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030604685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040504774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004027389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07670009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290841886","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401812016","title":"Exploring European Social Policy. By Robert R. Geyer. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2000. 272p. $50.00 cloth, $14.99 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; European union; Politics; Political science; Dimension (graph theory); Economic history; Political economy; European integration; Sociology; Law; Economics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.07259502187151354,"score_gpt":0.35599170774460326,"score_spread":0.28339668587308975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290841886","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012069003,0.9602,0.00041077263,0.028359428,0.001979139,0.000012572243,0.00021387034,0.000041602452,0.008661873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006876487,0.92873013,0.001530638,0.007622256,0.0032123227,0.00010062931,0.00038381625,0.00015316287,0.051390596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920964,0.00031262732,0.00007071778,0.00014001856,0.0001842854,0.000082666986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986904,0.0008020612,0.00015969254,0.000058135538,0.00017684988,0.00011295929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021704093,0.003509917,0.0016301273,0.0044429223,0.0011071148,0.0031597926,0.0015809836,0.0045062723,0.028361805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035190065,0.0019280382,0.00062308623,0.009134455,0.0027015528,0.009236398,0.0021684181,0.005195696,0.01637864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031548014,0.000023125083,0.000119001474,0.00092361507,0.000030182922,0.00005584885,0.00033724747,0.00027725883,0.00009223141,0.010504879,0.91549814,0.07210698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002838312,0.000024688296,0.0014043491,0.0036095537,0.000022316763,0.00026827544,0.0006,0.00019024321,0.000117817224,0.025236873,0.9684767,0.00002077417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014419892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02564912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028361805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003197353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021579363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09487969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325250763","doi":"10.2307/2586294","title":"The Netherlands: Negotiating Sovereignty in an Interdependent World. By Thomas R. Rochon. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999. 318p. $65.00.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Sovereignty; Negotiation; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.020275193968190067,"score_gpt":0.374502901466702,"score_spread":0.35422770749851196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325250763","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079609983,0.8559518,0.0018628391,0.04805367,0.0016237447,0.000018767396,0.00033329104,0.000048073183,0.09131176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051969714,0.76972353,0.0030202598,0.004751096,0.0015564122,0.00011230565,0.0005635809,0.00021665261,0.16808636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994085,0.00026099966,0.000044852455,0.000071343755,0.00014974365,0.0000645855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934787,0.00034945473,0.00010122893,0.000035824363,0.00008349265,0.00008205809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001547186,0.0012226624,0.0008188854,0.0013695433,0.0015325258,0.004728082,0.001172283,0.0033935406,0.029546307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027158402,0.0012078425,0.00037797267,0.0041086236,0.004303613,0.008216646,0.00237081,0.002478355,0.007435077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027749593,0.000015943613,0.00033813698,0.0006482204,0.000027125965,0.00015480196,0.00169123,0.0008239976,0.00013303822,0.09300413,0.82035685,0.082778655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018051169,0.000008659088,0.0017400432,0.0019226295,0.000016647271,0.00020391772,0.0016374987,0.00041411296,0.00009282491,0.07208146,0.9218472,0.000016974413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061314583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13903952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061314583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054346984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045515248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1219154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475647266","doi":"10.2307/2586253","title":"Comparative Peace Processes in Latin America. Edited by Cynthia J. Arnson. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999. 216p. $60.00 cloth, $24.00 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Center (category theory); Latin Americans; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.019716511217039625,"score_gpt":0.3280309282710425,"score_spread":0.3083144170540029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475647266","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040938627,0.94585955,0.00062899897,0.018429575,0.003446829,0.000015962138,0.00049606257,0.00006389296,0.030649688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014481343,0.92019755,0.0023567409,0.002989852,0.0045318417,0.00007763099,0.0008279005,0.00015643235,0.05438065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995777,0.00018040727,0.00002431546,0.000055878507,0.000105677565,0.000055968212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991725,0.00034374878,0.00013346656,0.000055274864,0.00018634571,0.000108664535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015072684,0.0026022657,0.0013152387,0.0047950353,0.0013555766,0.0034067235,0.0013786232,0.0014919526,0.04095308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024939813,0.0012111085,0.00089492725,0.0078124832,0.002614251,0.0046608974,0.0016156166,0.0030806814,0.008575989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049610066,0.000038284426,0.0006905233,0.0010198005,0.0000610287,0.00008806178,0.0011306381,0.0003415215,0.00028695582,0.019500853,0.8643829,0.112409785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021501794,0.000016048507,0.0040968116,0.0014978847,0.000030670224,0.00020254323,0.0009313724,0.000098484976,0.0001403613,0.027699722,0.9652442,0.000020496875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033509742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054600213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04095308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004243116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004497092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1370017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476773167","doi":"10.2307/2586389","title":"Machiavelli's Romans: Liberty and Greatness in <i>The Discourses on Livy</i>. By J. Patrick Coby. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999. 267p. $65.00 cloth, $23.95 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Greatness; Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Literature; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019888506426649872,"score_gpt":0.2791265363852186,"score_spread":0.25923802995856876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476773167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008900034,0.17671686,0.0023475708,0.16157785,0.0011509551,0.000015359296,0.00006747528,0.00004485056,0.64917904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7884416,0.055671223,0.0019308429,0.014020319,0.0026603874,0.00009233854,0.000057997368,0.00014020492,0.1369851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912804,0.0005125122,0.000023724308,0.00008682245,0.000120408105,0.0001285258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990553,0.00058897753,0.00012212229,0.00008382215,0.000059010115,0.00009079703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014128959,0.00048785828,0.0004523734,0.0009624651,0.005335866,0.0054175598,0.0006956255,0.002400093,0.0073118475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034910534,0.0004073362,0.00026134477,0.0009692915,0.0190058,0.008005259,0.002660485,0.005475368,0.0011565953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014512356,0.0000061121714,0.000106268126,0.000039405324,0.0000025523195,0.000040716634,0.007889206,0.00002942318,0.00002632868,0.94426304,0.03895044,0.008632028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017352477,0.000014270164,0.0012060029,0.00030925067,0.000004600247,0.00016269251,0.0048885755,0.000089786605,0.00007735448,0.5527106,0.44050992,0.000009615867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006204187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013132897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073118475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033205163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014956639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024460554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489258484","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000570","title":"Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Variation (astronomy); Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Armed conflict; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Data science; History; Law","score_opus":0.07314714434523127,"score_gpt":0.41766532487090746,"score_spread":0.3445181805256762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489258484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93523574,0.008778309,0.0188145,0.0020622232,0.00039756816,0.0002264342,0.017330537,0.00042220572,0.016732596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97489625,0.0024318583,0.006991833,0.000118791395,0.0006190411,0.00011031501,0.012369574,0.000032078373,0.0024302078],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999213,0.00038963152,0.00007413377,0.00014072961,0.00013596799,0.000046623427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988203,0.008952599,0.0016152813,0.00023056983,0.0006855305,0.00031302904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281449,0.00051709695,0.0003874312,0.0057666213,0.00025551216,0.0014651944,0.0004222349,0.0006984929,0.0039678896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011866996,0.00020241814,0.00039840824,0.0044339043,0.00023396222,0.0017610238,0.0005089583,0.00080996857,0.0020272213],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083818194,0.00044637045,0.7110646,0.0009648896,0.0006916785,0.0006359353,0.0013082917,0.012455279,0.0019682941,0.0023529194,0.018903093,0.24837041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008868843,0.000302213,0.86291045,0.0003922596,0.00040336628,0.0003620519,0.0017096413,0.1049457,0.0021580104,0.0075402176,0.019114865,0.00007255533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028207987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002646791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057666213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034603596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002037356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013273895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492772346","doi":"10.2307/2586105","title":"Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. By Richard Wyn Jones. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999. 196p. $49.95.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015467345222469332,"score_gpt":0.3653537686849446,"score_spread":0.3498864234624753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492772346","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017601628,0.9630946,0.0010988357,0.012331206,0.0021776666,0.000020036796,0.00031596722,0.0001400407,0.020645589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009814225,0.8700306,0.0029688922,0.004316285,0.0025219738,0.00015409713,0.0006363916,0.0003419479,0.10921559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992982,0.00020994252,0.000078560144,0.00013475948,0.00020827794,0.000070352726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976671,0.0012646342,0.00023750977,0.00016039037,0.0004902995,0.0001800858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017454878,0.0031943668,0.0019013355,0.0039015145,0.0015050469,0.00281209,0.0017618269,0.0032842862,0.049902737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004354269,0.002755347,0.000854528,0.0077572064,0.0033502053,0.008237562,0.0022611453,0.0048025567,0.035729446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044812674,0.000023728893,0.00024167557,0.0010676751,0.00003318291,0.00005862711,0.0002970351,0.00031043807,0.0001570693,0.008405126,0.88586223,0.10349824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044651362,0.00003347647,0.0028473565,0.004074517,0.000051885923,0.00044092475,0.00064640294,0.00052457774,0.0001752341,0.044573005,0.9465433,0.00004466712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027887197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052716203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049902737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036052677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022220616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16694129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498699788","doi":"10.2307/2586062","title":"All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. By Michael Herb. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999. 352p. $49.50.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute monarchy; Monarchy; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.054240415159527815,"score_gpt":0.30757044686286106,"score_spread":0.25333003170333324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498699788","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030293337,0.9146554,0.00010766373,0.06301597,0.0010800145,0.0000060438615,0.000083879226,0.000007652737,0.01801413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19834617,0.76123464,0.0002143397,0.0059528677,0.0030051745,0.000028935721,0.00016874654,0.000013961916,0.031035086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996623,0.00019245445,0.000011852541,0.000025236734,0.000051426647,0.000056748384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.0002605033,0.00008630116,0.000021532842,0.000059385857,0.000119156604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010347713,0.00055010774,0.0004567152,0.00092726387,0.0015661318,0.001708536,0.0006110624,0.0015073452,0.012070525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002175847,0.00029731204,0.00022794481,0.0023222342,0.0029657867,0.0032302237,0.00096844276,0.0014683792,0.0012678341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012830111,0.000075675205,0.0044170814,0.0012009861,0.00008756654,0.00028942674,0.0070887287,0.00036694348,0.00014214483,0.092479266,0.7079612,0.18576273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008115041,0.00009649338,0.062460423,0.004458091,0.00011265726,0.00049752905,0.01260838,0.00038369148,0.00019059193,0.124842644,0.79422826,0.00004004625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035564486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10309393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035564486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003306842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025375083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07071495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506422090","doi":"10.2307/2586228","title":"Acting in Concert: Music, Community, and Political Action. By Mark Mattern. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998. 240p. $50.00 cloth, $20.00 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Music History and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Montana","keywords":"Action (physics); Politics; Political action; Media studies; Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Art; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04050179313464677,"score_gpt":0.27223105470299735,"score_spread":0.23172926156835058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506422090","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015477368,0.97992504,0.00010788769,0.011371784,0.001394807,0.000006723774,0.000085628344,0.00001685116,0.0069365054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007301719,0.95218855,0.00037127684,0.0032413993,0.0024381406,0.000029915707,0.00017595859,0.000027008866,0.034225915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995554,0.00014265017,0.00003794267,0.00005777164,0.00015135585,0.000054941862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990388,0.00041589467,0.00017147446,0.000043699576,0.0001708382,0.00015928214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012726857,0.002168413,0.0011356566,0.0037298647,0.0014499638,0.003134353,0.0013021816,0.0023634746,0.029058183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002228287,0.0013891323,0.00046428738,0.006710039,0.0028295508,0.0056676287,0.0014748253,0.0027481136,0.010382408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051035207,0.00003074043,0.00052716787,0.0013636607,0.00003976074,0.000053688545,0.00056032,0.00015186382,0.00014282757,0.005943005,0.84176075,0.14937514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025038607,0.000036172903,0.008348114,0.0033476986,0.000051660656,0.00047147283,0.0014770513,0.00013541516,0.00011710837,0.009224975,0.97673756,0.00002781732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048096254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13179086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048096254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032620078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027541271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097209334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567622053","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000393","title":"Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Normative; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07368246469849857,"score_gpt":0.4173249267825241,"score_spread":0.3436424620840255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567622053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17238499,0.039560385,0.06453727,0.13326064,0.00082000584,0.000039355135,0.00009609159,0.00016245835,0.5891388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717725,0.0030353998,0.0024742433,0.0028389937,0.00030243216,0.000016840744,0.0000164629,0.000031474236,0.0041068173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973369,0.001663112,0.00008505231,0.00032415567,0.00043044306,0.00016036068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493176,0.003506606,0.00060525275,0.0003952425,0.00041014736,0.00015099159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052993703,0.00028553346,0.00035109688,0.0016420338,0.0016928635,0.004925826,0.00073790556,0.0020372635,0.0035307994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077179708,0.00022011828,0.0003558453,0.0012483597,0.027511118,0.00799492,0.0027065035,0.0034760875,0.00038236933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017301452,0.000009504657,0.00042347793,0.00006903594,0.000010426805,0.00007469713,0.007006781,0.00012254447,0.00017866082,0.98260707,0.0011462586,0.008334252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062696067,0.00000954384,0.0010423721,0.0000866815,0.000007834393,0.00010630725,0.0019855716,0.0002684501,0.00015792642,0.97340685,0.022911623,0.000010661107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018262531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014085679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052993703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022708015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012784572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028026104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569043970","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000314","title":"Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Survey data collection; Economics; Voting behavior; Disapproval voting; Public economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.2021885000756728,"score_gpt":0.4871787403623084,"score_spread":0.2849902402866356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569043970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694304,0.0056362287,0.0027349056,0.00069799373,0.00011528375,0.00009521333,0.008415506,0.000031079726,0.012843299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858807,0.0023324876,0.0010337493,0.0002535315,0.000090225636,0.00008750859,0.008691674,0.000021730179,0.001608488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804248,0.012721927,0.0014842338,0.0018866261,0.0028390787,0.00064339745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89138293,0.04649958,0.04061952,0.0144093735,0.0060339,0.0010547136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021263253,0.00035431643,0.0010894181,0.0045047347,0.00064219383,0.0015797783,0.0012993612,0.0007932656,0.006276159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087942824,0.00040141924,0.00073925446,0.010398549,0.0009617648,0.0015851693,0.0019924347,0.00082863524,0.0019893083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066707074,0.000093210765,0.95011145,0.00065843423,0.0009948594,0.000093158604,0.0011198315,0.00032340296,0.00016834178,0.0022035507,0.004303108,0.039263606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043033357,0.00015648613,0.98404455,0.00030961834,0.00044211338,0.00017399032,0.0013655598,0.0006225253,0.00036694264,0.0009428775,0.011500224,0.000031991756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007441847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01041621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021263253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040842977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004589989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11245221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589179404","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000605","title":"A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":459,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sophistication; Sketch; Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Voting; Deliberative democracy; Democratic theory; Political science; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Polycentricity; Power (physics); Law and economics; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.07751967023305721,"score_gpt":0.42145263960019386,"score_spread":0.34393296936713663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589179404","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003283134,0.015250979,0.5023667,0.092952065,0.0012231645,0.00030497505,0.00020992557,0.00016266003,0.3842464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58858776,0.020979602,0.3099398,0.017335339,0.003660908,0.0023409878,0.00044107964,0.00030468256,0.056409895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830791,0.0110447975,0.0006463062,0.0017763526,0.0027843784,0.0006690402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888222,0.0077138795,0.0005285222,0.0014460159,0.0010736992,0.0004155623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014606998,0.0013805769,0.0015601395,0.003953358,0.0046571917,0.010958321,0.004177334,0.0053719264,0.008756887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127980225,0.0006966123,0.0018254572,0.003623114,0.04645278,0.010829997,0.0057443934,0.011416811,0.0018635297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010571781,0.0000046536916,0.000015866894,0.000025396244,0.0000033177907,0.000005834878,0.00012677576,0.00042512134,0.000008321673,0.99763346,0.0007088887,0.0010412633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004596548,0.0000030443741,0.000012778275,0.000032301283,0.0000016597974,0.000009501651,0.00006510003,0.00076292414,0.000018529247,0.9836537,0.015433171,0.0000026724376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034400078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024129623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014606998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010876355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008266041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621070810","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000107","title":"Montesquieu's Teaching on the Dangers of Extreme Corrections: Japan, the Catholic Inquisition, and Moderation in<i>The Spirit of the Laws</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Enlightenment; Orientalism; Law; Neutrality; Eurocentrism; Notice; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06622258284227618,"score_gpt":0.3888059236055659,"score_spread":0.3225833407632897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621070810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06727249,0.072844416,0.002447769,0.6343245,0.0025775859,0.000014020221,0.000076966775,0.00003603839,0.22040612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373229,0.011643786,0.0004286151,0.036698546,0.002228447,0.000020135385,0.000013125281,0.000023525297,0.011620956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979286,0.0012095053,0.00005473769,0.0002218103,0.0003963646,0.00018889968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943245,0.004311119,0.00051702745,0.00017341638,0.0004461236,0.0002277225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00230783,0.00017991355,0.00018795418,0.00052460784,0.0032685567,0.0036932144,0.0006574378,0.0032235766,0.0018427339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008942428,0.00015359417,0.00015671823,0.00071942154,0.009412372,0.002420201,0.0010362654,0.0032721097,0.000117653915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003670496,0.000011632125,0.0012949426,0.0001739095,0.000008540506,0.00016791292,0.016496189,0.00018946939,0.0001820914,0.9081588,0.06433109,0.008948779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031345655,0.000022927701,0.012621781,0.0008707089,0.000033381057,0.00029611244,0.011703815,0.00045831793,0.0005267436,0.109538615,0.8638578,0.00003839777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037937295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061702836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037937295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004775544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034532133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075432956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734757516","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000259","title":"Does Democratic Consolidation Lead to a Decline in Voter Turnout? Global Evidence Since 1939","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Turnout; Voting; Democracy; Political economy; Dictatorship; Political science; Opposition (politics); Consolidation (business); Democratic consolidation; Voter turnout; Legislature; Salience (neuroscience); Context (archaeology); Development economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.07444486485491321,"score_gpt":0.4673315746379286,"score_spread":0.39288670978301543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734757516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76727587,0.17689799,0.00080432545,0.012580333,0.00043979747,0.00003238323,0.002027912,0.000029456683,0.03991195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97452116,0.023285227,0.000080628524,0.0005893373,0.00029354435,0.0000058462165,0.0005080323,0.00000968658,0.00070659735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988593,0.0003863144,0.00008283186,0.0003008453,0.00012933287,0.00024136284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896466,0.0034140784,0.0042477786,0.0006864818,0.0014394362,0.0005655603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029783582,0.00026544914,0.0005760259,0.0013098414,0.00042053493,0.0010078499,0.0004385969,0.00050657627,0.0066165654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008567143,0.00020569298,0.0005582639,0.0027117943,0.0017538854,0.0010278979,0.0010383239,0.001211494,0.00064558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012149933,0.00012333976,0.79192245,0.0022462108,0.0011650855,0.00031946413,0.0029003455,0.0005181549,0.00062537956,0.008721362,0.0061479653,0.18409519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023522642,0.00017552031,0.9742319,0.00048768413,0.00027723494,0.0001408829,0.001080669,0.00006747347,0.00026504646,0.0010402559,0.022199543,0.000010282006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012133154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123632485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012133154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007325211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066833093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02412504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736330361","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000138","title":"Ethnic Segregation and Public Goods: Evidence from Indonesia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fractionalization; Public good; Ethnic group; Leverage (statistics); Decentralization; Diversity (politics); Distribution (mathematics); Development economics; Political science; Economics; Economic geography; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.11666830580528773,"score_gpt":0.4162851425426253,"score_spread":0.2996168367373375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736330361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852358,0.0022065328,0.00023652904,0.00064340164,0.0000110269775,0.000011815393,0.0004332408,0.000003108007,0.011218534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970106,0.0016381419,0.00009687448,0.00009871754,0.000013472675,0.000007254999,0.00035771696,0.0000020923171,0.00077517546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992912,0.00029260168,0.00005704588,0.00010800523,0.00014205877,0.00010904412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583936,0.0012459076,0.0019823257,0.00023398461,0.00041354046,0.00028485392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010363346,0.00019282447,0.0005617788,0.0010130497,0.00073338236,0.0012066587,0.00033985166,0.00024721283,0.0034968676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033173852,0.00015756211,0.00023842507,0.0032836415,0.0008082507,0.0006284704,0.0011414634,0.0006133161,0.0004738329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037292324,0.00047545257,0.95676583,0.00033658434,0.0003298612,0.0006108826,0.004313349,0.0005650635,0.00030173585,0.004377227,0.0021238325,0.02942736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026312668,0.000066075765,0.98429155,0.0002199394,0.00018301053,0.0001862826,0.0074709463,0.0005780275,0.00029974748,0.001121931,0.005545459,0.0000107229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03933564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050156835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03933564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083665334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081236387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078213334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767591425","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000442","title":"Democratic Citizenship and Denationalization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Law; Law and economics; Terrorism; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.09744153784587155,"score_gpt":0.3641687994074506,"score_spread":0.26672726156157905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767591425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060942512,0.02927023,0.024891807,0.14564227,0.0012457849,0.000085505635,0.000085586,0.00005770183,0.73777854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709226,0.0058175707,0.0016764064,0.011143508,0.0004807524,0.00008425309,0.000034735847,0.000024294945,0.009815821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98603654,0.008881474,0.0005312046,0.001269877,0.0016475383,0.001633408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98425746,0.010104278,0.0018128944,0.002010116,0.0012508476,0.00056439295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012116241,0.00023166477,0.00046607375,0.0008955563,0.003430489,0.004529218,0.00063821167,0.004130156,0.0033407947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018067868,0.00020970886,0.0004478372,0.0009631724,0.042021893,0.0058100936,0.0040441346,0.0053558405,0.00041065217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028279599,0.000006506873,0.00024010864,0.000034238117,0.000003806296,0.000014976938,0.0008083756,0.00009303468,0.000024946152,0.99357986,0.001195605,0.0039958083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015620666,0.000019742416,0.0015308678,0.00038529254,0.000010945899,0.000084969775,0.001445315,0.0001473937,0.00017916725,0.8790428,0.117123306,0.000014643585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00352578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003889465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012116241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027353899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005938679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064077556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779364895","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000569","title":"Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Status quo bias; Politics; Personality; Status quo; Discounting; Work (physics); Appeal; Regret; Subject (documents); Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.10032325166488373,"score_gpt":0.529907989688136,"score_spread":0.42958473802325225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779364895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99632204,0.000038041097,0.0004879882,0.00012658676,0.000023570727,0.00015607444,0.000036727895,0.0000053378744,0.0028036537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941466,0.00011724435,0.0018538734,0.00020843816,0.00005083354,0.0004931595,0.00010846629,0.000009788881,0.003011634],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965083,0.0024099357,0.00011909092,0.00037501167,0.00037025014,0.00021727991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858255,0.009574175,0.0018988403,0.0018510192,0.00034323634,0.0005071011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004752522,0.00037554724,0.0004881188,0.0003110298,0.0010858605,0.0014372789,0.0007411375,0.0010386701,0.0060850675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015369107,0.0002994156,0.00030616688,0.00042059607,0.0018847039,0.0007237007,0.00068734755,0.001684638,0.00080211455],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036381703,0.34480372,0.14986278,0.0012028123,0.000746955,0.0011674295,0.073033966,0.0050622425,0.119047806,0.07273849,0.009776071,0.18617608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022508569,0.17120788,0.5084626,0.00042409694,0.00084718014,0.0014560389,0.046511758,0.02962928,0.058743674,0.10247195,0.057250418,0.00048664171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001672298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021835463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060850675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007537367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063913205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025134027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793309941","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400500537","title":"Open States in the Global Economy: The Political Economy of Small-State Macroeconomic Management. By Jonathon Moses. New York: St. Martin's, 2000. 259p. $69.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Economics; Economy; Politics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.020803169247194,"score_gpt":0.27208077602021485,"score_spread":0.25127760677302086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793309941","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049671374,0.92428505,0.0010599919,0.041213237,0.0022902258,0.0000097650145,0.0005424869,0.000107267195,0.029995222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020680867,0.8833221,0.001298697,0.0033314181,0.0026157503,0.00004391416,0.00057677494,0.00011878451,0.08801174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997507,0.000060705745,0.000020411786,0.000038342903,0.00009095421,0.000038938844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993123,0.00030723732,0.000120191544,0.000030178437,0.000121265744,0.000108845175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007878762,0.0016150645,0.00078421185,0.0020787278,0.00074858137,0.0028587067,0.0007116785,0.0022536167,0.045203317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020271046,0.0010319046,0.00034694767,0.0045038713,0.0018005737,0.007514613,0.0014278071,0.002318993,0.016113212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016914422,0.000011561793,0.00035307882,0.00038277725,0.000014186299,0.000031746622,0.000218524,0.0002758372,0.00006997288,0.021002376,0.90067446,0.07694868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011231634,0.000012399274,0.003419148,0.001497492,0.000019460547,0.00011047833,0.00041422484,0.0003140351,0.00007458831,0.053398695,0.9407076,0.000020482132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015932478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050154574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045203317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021576076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021808366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1512202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795668280","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000151","title":"Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; United States Institute of Peace","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Contact hypothesis; Social psychology; Psychology; Social contact; Contact theory; Intervention (counseling); Cognitive dissonance; Observational study; Class (philosophy); Homogeneous; Constructive; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06263205100054903,"score_gpt":0.46191299556883025,"score_spread":0.3992809445682812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795668280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940752,0.0010857638,0.00054676493,0.00033788767,0.00011034143,0.0007859675,0.000043576278,0.0000053321082,0.0030091314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907782,0.0035393678,0.0022528518,0.0005143161,0.000086551794,0.0010489466,0.000060686867,0.0000046920336,0.0017143926],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572384,0.0033770406,0.00016025774,0.00026448857,0.0002884606,0.00018596872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932643,0.00425839,0.0011319177,0.00059983693,0.0002720826,0.00047335617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064688227,0.00051577896,0.0006188614,0.00021335471,0.0012755309,0.00062953535,0.0007217694,0.00089096464,0.0033624473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073827016,0.00029261052,0.00044100822,0.00025476413,0.0016178131,0.0005266086,0.0005714311,0.0009552858,0.0003679935],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0787423,0.34769523,0.084882684,0.009667087,0.0019417674,0.00083877874,0.013607569,0.0007603534,0.047407236,0.0064482274,0.0036617867,0.4043469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026342899,0.5254357,0.3641844,0.003722714,0.0031729417,0.0007360602,0.014104559,0.001160435,0.026037492,0.006522046,0.028448774,0.00013195157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018836044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039387243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064688227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036946422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001088765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0342108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804147862","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000199","title":"Independent Candidates and Political Representation in India","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Representation (politics); Voter turnout; Politics; Percentage point; Government (linguistics); Ethnic group; Proportional representation; Demographic economics; Exploit; Contingent vote; General election; Standard deviation; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Voting; Statistics; Group voting ticket; Democracy; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security; Finance","score_opus":0.04011006995609783,"score_gpt":0.4356902913486197,"score_spread":0.39558022139252186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804147862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994231,0.000076817065,0.0002251013,0.00022201781,0.000007020245,0.0000123077725,0.000314506,0.000015377631,0.0048959367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870646,0.0000403393,0.00004954971,0.00001382098,0.000007879556,0.0000072201296,0.00021184774,0.0000021121953,0.00096078817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885,0.0003853014,0.000042553052,0.00010526278,0.00013983634,0.00047711548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957957,0.0013229812,0.0018445081,0.00028432088,0.00020908561,0.00054342387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089840655,0.00024998884,0.00039570738,0.0019459854,0.0011652751,0.0017823126,0.0006606625,0.00039712526,0.009131528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037491764,0.0002061945,0.00074955,0.003241819,0.0011933782,0.0003747751,0.0019611444,0.00093938963,0.0009227177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002872572,0.00021228782,0.9758134,0.00006406867,0.00013180621,0.00038709352,0.0019572151,0.002730267,0.00023292654,0.006592773,0.0018514113,0.0097394595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032886543,0.00012654785,0.98907745,0.000024736342,0.000104819854,0.00014080806,0.0026143023,0.0030591309,0.00022396611,0.0015425001,0.003037392,0.000015495041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036699258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03712815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036699258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012506745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092730107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072971284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888626241","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400400559","title":"Between the State and Islam. Edited by Charles E. Butterworth and I. William Zartman. Washington, DC, and Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press, 2001. 256p. $49.95 cloth, $18.95 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Islam; Center (category theory); Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.018380252659425174,"score_gpt":0.2868876969293539,"score_spread":0.26850744426992873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888626241","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004118915,0.88591474,0.00071465,0.03171286,0.0057464726,0.000016816346,0.0003646311,0.000054272747,0.075063676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01875877,0.6887215,0.002231237,0.008735883,0.0057188566,0.000069267415,0.00060407474,0.00014838166,0.27501205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993795,0.0001651801,0.00004308184,0.00010916385,0.00023590616,0.00006711063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994154,0.0002316479,0.000114404014,0.000043004893,0.00011862419,0.00007691658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008944618,0.0017491883,0.0009397791,0.0026066715,0.0015668157,0.0033293683,0.0011395176,0.0023361114,0.049217626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020776668,0.0011062198,0.0005969805,0.0038063254,0.003175042,0.00547374,0.0015450697,0.003615187,0.017548071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021225012,0.000017430471,0.00027851277,0.00034264877,0.000015694914,0.00007618387,0.0005052033,0.00011906999,0.00010514426,0.020701533,0.89395267,0.083864644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071823792,0.0000071679688,0.0011807209,0.00080423814,0.000008553129,0.00014776009,0.00046358383,0.00003657022,0.000059883627,0.019358104,0.9779172,0.000008926289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027309708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0630254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049217626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00323672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047391304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16464937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891564017","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000527","title":"The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Democracy; Writ; Elite; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.06261548645886392,"score_gpt":0.4068541026422285,"score_spread":0.3442386161833646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891564017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06546521,0.018021926,0.07997962,0.575686,0.0015414706,0.00003609001,0.000080839825,0.0000926167,0.2590963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97653025,0.004228972,0.0044888565,0.009327629,0.0018856484,0.000057631267,0.000022387692,0.000038914648,0.0034195632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98103255,0.014409602,0.00040671407,0.0014284565,0.0017764295,0.00094624027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507997,0.03964422,0.0024608215,0.0037129296,0.0020218166,0.0013605378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026753232,0.00050930504,0.0011790931,0.00225234,0.008819892,0.013333634,0.0017429083,0.0081769815,0.0045495313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047448818,0.0005781149,0.00074102695,0.0019386756,0.05543444,0.032236457,0.01132013,0.011262075,0.0006842597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008562537,0.000005549053,0.00016052208,0.000029427112,0.00000388334,0.000036658592,0.0019316579,0.0001835009,0.000022370172,0.9924287,0.0011885322,0.0040005897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053339427,0.000003017963,0.000053366017,0.00004290972,0.0000019273102,0.000019956698,0.0008844748,0.00024505562,0.000016652342,0.99340963,0.005314357,0.0000033389088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083356735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010022661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026753232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033233392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033059919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14148629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913465623","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000886","title":"“Judge Lynch” in the Court of Public Opinion: Publicity and the De-legitimation of Lynching","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Newspaper; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Legitimation; Political science; Public opinion; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Advertising; History; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.0417557988375189,"score_gpt":0.39030323400858097,"score_spread":0.34854743517106207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913465623","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1428934,0.06556226,0.0043090037,0.39726213,0.0027136921,0.00006147524,0.00013970607,0.00004847021,0.38700992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721733,0.009576008,0.00033245227,0.011950221,0.00210874,0.000024317194,0.000035714416,0.000021473832,0.003777717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97792065,0.015716223,0.00056435005,0.000963433,0.0031718167,0.0016635297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91474855,0.064077966,0.010317915,0.0018285688,0.0071176365,0.0019094317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017512297,0.0002298365,0.00048048774,0.0030685733,0.0043431036,0.008972102,0.001319406,0.0060140337,0.0054635196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08631716,0.00036423936,0.00041220334,0.002982758,0.02295026,0.008899011,0.0035291137,0.006580657,0.0005652889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098192795,0.00008053706,0.013242774,0.0005883797,0.00012431758,0.0008233018,0.026623914,0.00040404437,0.0003150457,0.85127074,0.046213217,0.060215555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018476488,0.00015242689,0.068698935,0.0041759396,0.000222045,0.00066039857,0.046471786,0.0014154167,0.0011325344,0.4067709,0.46995214,0.00016266956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012862573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015742369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017512297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006363275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004639126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09261495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937055506","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402374343","title":"Globalization of Japan: Japanese Sakoku Mentality and U.S. Efforts to Open Japan. By Mayumi Itoh. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. 256p. $45.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; EPIC; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Political science; World economy; Subject (documents); Economic globalization; Economic history; Scale (ratio); Political economy; Economy; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03322563554346016,"score_gpt":0.33577359281930347,"score_spread":0.3025479572758433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937055506","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075610855,0.96265316,0.000074913885,0.019295089,0.0025482017,0.000005403664,0.0001439828,0.000021561415,0.014501634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014906134,0.88690513,0.00030900276,0.004605402,0.0017832796,0.000034512916,0.00025515945,0.000046952027,0.091154486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999874,0.000031121002,0.000012001855,0.000021290938,0.000037473746,0.000024158899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997806,0.000045978206,0.00005214149,0.0000054994002,0.000046975274,0.00006895284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044416694,0.0011705394,0.00043971697,0.0011537111,0.0011508228,0.0018928248,0.00045519415,0.0013458098,0.028912997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054565875,0.0006912071,0.00026931555,0.0031235549,0.0011387733,0.0038235951,0.0010838041,0.0014601905,0.008230347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037098467,0.000013909803,0.00090082973,0.0009887733,0.000018886558,0.00010874239,0.0022811543,0.000057550158,0.00013797378,0.005394016,0.9145222,0.075538926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073958004,0.000012331654,0.008882137,0.00095805933,0.000029093962,0.00017137085,0.0024536997,0.00003870195,0.000035507728,0.0018752186,0.98552495,0.000011620822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04136589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14778045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04136589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019220903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023340376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096723616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944160600","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402240472","title":"Global Limits: Immanuel Kant, International Relations, and a Critique of World Politics. By Mark F. N. Franke. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001. 265p. $59.50 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020860455098622787,"score_gpt":0.3079925515645295,"score_spread":0.2871320964659067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944160600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013588375,0.8111035,0.0021982926,0.11662064,0.0019253108,0.000006660564,0.000047008827,0.000026228032,0.066713445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26288465,0.5659937,0.004992762,0.03866027,0.008713824,0.00012472866,0.00013379927,0.00016749602,0.11832877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991055,0.00047570668,0.000034555233,0.00007981501,0.0002177081,0.000086667955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989058,0.0007187618,0.000117984055,0.000048719503,0.00012594204,0.00008271013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001730859,0.0009143388,0.0006294193,0.0021946963,0.0025282418,0.0049013593,0.00087659166,0.00350048,0.005317913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037625635,0.00070709735,0.0003619451,0.0032954172,0.008485661,0.008355178,0.0017144401,0.0036926845,0.0012647224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031266638,0.000021304473,0.00025431492,0.00030193786,0.000017314931,0.00013898716,0.0030297225,0.0004131294,0.00007554821,0.59383255,0.3651845,0.036699444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010525459,0.000007591419,0.00067290256,0.0010167417,0.00001020324,0.00015698398,0.00178429,0.0001437263,0.00007616158,0.49162108,0.50448596,0.000013760135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006840985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016259672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006840985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037166572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026287844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026966393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944179347","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400400572","title":"The Politics of Pragmatism: Women, Representation, and Constitutionalism in Canada. By Alexandra Dobrowolsky. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, 2000. 320p. $24.75 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Representation (politics); Pragmatism; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.014677506223990775,"score_gpt":0.27515452127969314,"score_spread":0.26047701505570237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944179347","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033016154,0.82402885,0.00038042173,0.13318309,0.0012703825,0.000023342156,0.00032265674,0.000026879292,0.037462674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18732543,0.71524954,0.0009337712,0.010008225,0.0016188247,0.00006733477,0.0003216111,0.00009953483,0.08437574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861526,0.0003462348,0.000037038655,0.00012927082,0.0005724024,0.00029981445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802834,0.0007096006,0.00018835333,0.00006200049,0.0006711722,0.0003405558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019574799,0.0011470148,0.00069277803,0.0035992586,0.010497904,0.0074455147,0.0017467837,0.0030769052,0.008653696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043595894,0.00076224015,0.00034121258,0.010651456,0.015157774,0.0036810962,0.0018861423,0.0036588102,0.00093944697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048549722,0.00004434665,0.0021518082,0.00086019514,0.000044369826,0.00020287918,0.015137909,0.00064745184,0.00018646932,0.15606605,0.7177834,0.10682659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035001853,0.000012658262,0.02104592,0.0020326828,0.000049910846,0.00017270907,0.011319984,0.0005025399,0.0002078423,0.054487042,0.9100593,0.0000743001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96385074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9838037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08182036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08182036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06609733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59365106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944759311","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402390476","title":"Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post–Cold War Era. By J. Ann Tickner. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001. 262p. $45.00 cloth, $17.50 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Politics; State (computer science); International relations; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Cold war; Gender studies; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0829163070775253,"score_gpt":0.3164031981843397,"score_spread":0.23348689110681442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944759311","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015268168,0.96260446,0.00016037935,0.024195991,0.0025752545,0.0000054002426,0.000021116068,0.0000058415444,0.01027883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008608428,0.9451706,0.00034358457,0.009918374,0.0032694025,0.000055218334,0.00006178471,0.000025601492,0.032547005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899524,0.0004834855,0.000041147283,0.000090709786,0.00029846592,0.0000908945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983907,0.0010500589,0.0001484379,0.000037422866,0.0002190394,0.00015448898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024468272,0.0010489443,0.00090711523,0.002982941,0.0024281507,0.00600141,0.0009835801,0.0035018492,0.011376297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032539973,0.00074356503,0.0003772245,0.0073265783,0.0049234475,0.008665411,0.0020910087,0.0055972533,0.003073904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030975487,0.00004272266,0.0003268617,0.0015269677,0.000017127151,0.000096441116,0.004745129,0.0001139536,0.00009754137,0.0754141,0.7728171,0.1447711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044611343,0.000009406406,0.0010515128,0.0022831415,0.000006538222,0.00013548526,0.003209852,0.000028211429,0.000028291637,0.022033004,0.97120225,0.000007833537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021025447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038151763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021025447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004741791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005881381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04180616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970769854","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000376","title":"Investment in the Shadow of Conflict: Globalization, Capital Control, and State Repression","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Economic system; Capital (architecture); Globalization; Market economy; Expropriation; Collective action; Capital accumulation; Harm; Shadow (psychology); Investment (military); Political economy; Politics; Political science; Human capital","score_opus":0.014372989566235034,"score_gpt":0.34511401684477067,"score_spread":0.3307410272785356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970769854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5197928,0.16061094,0.005875574,0.056671277,0.00025589243,0.00003182718,0.000079821766,0.000018368517,0.25666356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706369,0.026417391,0.00027351928,0.0008386533,0.00014915357,0.0000086644095,0.000014314789,0.0000029264884,0.0016584541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990062,0.0005717689,0.000022437423,0.000060408376,0.00011898093,0.00022029156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975955,0.0011576955,0.000832562,0.00007190249,0.0001583436,0.00018401438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018339176,0.0001944989,0.00033521108,0.0008651439,0.000747719,0.0029300733,0.0003806012,0.0009769449,0.003104739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025417856,0.00011065833,0.0002747898,0.0013187163,0.0055529256,0.0023220135,0.0014981641,0.00083885057,0.00011517748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014061444,0.00010037192,0.04117423,0.0007429925,0.00020280133,0.00042396248,0.0046524135,0.0028885081,0.0006740739,0.85267305,0.0037715975,0.092555426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094076306,0.00023540272,0.22549729,0.0023851513,0.0004004492,0.00089938723,0.015889488,0.0036789658,0.0012205081,0.58477867,0.16484304,0.00007755136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029480024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049796114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003104739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024752414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013785792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017959237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997690757","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000790","title":"Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Discretion; Credibility; Constraint (computer-aided design); Delegation; Monetary policy; Distributive property; Economics; Central bank; Distribution (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Business; Monetary economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01799498230365653,"score_gpt":0.26810461811089126,"score_spread":0.2501096358072347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997690757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1277067,0.006142764,0.052789826,0.1927867,0.0007995833,0.0001674321,0.00008047389,0.000108479224,0.61941797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98213816,0.0009920344,0.0023434071,0.0030162702,0.0004324427,0.000106760235,0.000008333249,0.000026220121,0.010936325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796627,0.010947348,0.00067975343,0.0024065808,0.0028950805,0.0034084013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754091,0.014410916,0.0028462813,0.0028710107,0.0028882518,0.0015745439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017175414,0.00040895393,0.0010472733,0.0018779194,0.014450731,0.019055793,0.002218642,0.016461318,0.005841376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0366601,0.0007851476,0.0010427738,0.0023190912,0.036233738,0.010615857,0.007971676,0.010948738,0.00092418125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008301512,0.000006909593,0.00016370267,0.00000634881,0.0000032044763,0.00010650356,0.0006414059,0.00020977286,0.000025705964,0.9966973,0.0011606389,0.000970294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009285266,0.000013898488,0.0004749766,0.00008360817,0.000018717092,0.00018383126,0.0009796572,0.0022857103,0.0001544443,0.9675125,0.028172383,0.000027334554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013754859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008865424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019055793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010242577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008988296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090833366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002992174","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000789","title":"Social Network Structures and the Politics of Public Goods Provision: Evidence from the Philippines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Politics; Clan; Incentive; Elite; Fractionalization; Competition (biology); Scale (ratio); Public economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Market economy; Microeconomics; Geography; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.07718946976691776,"score_gpt":0.38100215808743454,"score_spread":0.3038126883205168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002992174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835464,0.004299349,0.0006062814,0.0024373853,0.000009015766,0.000017444865,0.00044164015,0.000013831461,0.008628608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630725,0.0026348338,0.0001735333,0.0000808184,0.000019157373,0.000012234648,0.00019645493,0.0000030291485,0.00057285826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991529,0.00052097754,0.00002206373,0.00008539232,0.00010802911,0.0001106894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98763496,0.0046385718,0.0052224207,0.00037103455,0.0014024569,0.0007306192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001890143,0.00025405173,0.0002511547,0.0019512743,0.00093622395,0.0010880905,0.00062186527,0.00037221608,0.0036739628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008044739,0.00022001588,0.00017258094,0.003972881,0.0012786984,0.0012425416,0.0012652623,0.0005619094,0.00027741585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033179013,0.0002993412,0.8457306,0.001119511,0.0007078432,0.0009102159,0.022385737,0.0050339596,0.0006514173,0.022169547,0.0073161237,0.093343966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049108694,0.00009720027,0.9707671,0.0002834837,0.00019166362,0.00014800522,0.009441125,0.003611149,0.00018962858,0.0038274827,0.011369739,0.00002434235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076248184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07067914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076248184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014378848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078236376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1516087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004654961","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000807","title":"When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Operationalization; Conceptualization; Phenomenon; Democracy; Populism; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09085768465067101,"score_gpt":0.3497723236653853,"score_spread":0.2589146390147143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004654961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36747894,0.3524162,0.0675483,0.074275896,0.0016249671,0.00026052713,0.00026518575,0.0000744248,0.1360556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370311,0.046003673,0.012024535,0.0031087012,0.00062881596,0.00021422315,0.00009494389,0.000026906104,0.00086704135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802043,0.013099018,0.00083199237,0.0012099121,0.0041989214,0.00045599157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969659,0.020512793,0.0044139083,0.0015474083,0.0033408084,0.0005260314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028893262,0.00065994915,0.00086464896,0.008046475,0.0019076095,0.005589514,0.0011506913,0.001844085,0.0010186295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030425064,0.00029317682,0.00074964354,0.009509169,0.02397849,0.0073971576,0.004145948,0.0035310076,0.00017089088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070817405,0.000060182487,0.020956375,0.00097558036,0.00015912627,0.000128786,0.012712881,0.0006811928,0.00063782185,0.83271766,0.0025624824,0.12833712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031862186,0.00017943747,0.13116089,0.005377839,0.00017450689,0.00041862708,0.021184135,0.0027389142,0.00083408575,0.7667903,0.07092805,0.00018140308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043996405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005552565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028893262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004000702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035771313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15280402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027489367","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000143","title":"The Electoral System, the Party System and Accountability in Parliamentary Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Electoral system; Public administration; Multi-party system; Competition (biology); Political science; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.040329062060317236,"score_gpt":0.3636888808233629,"score_spread":0.3233598187630457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027489367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39095166,0.10099169,0.021606393,0.05537241,0.0011702565,0.00015740098,0.00040872855,0.00006249933,0.42927897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98695964,0.008517447,0.00092019915,0.0006771897,0.00032761827,0.000026745913,0.00006291698,0.000010683321,0.002497567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926259,0.004924954,0.00030997567,0.0003277463,0.0009880955,0.00082332816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905798,0.005015298,0.0023486046,0.000398357,0.0010249526,0.0006329219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007560804,0.00018917136,0.00037937984,0.0027300438,0.0019119205,0.003780837,0.0004414854,0.0010135691,0.0041176416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012772252,0.00019433616,0.00035294346,0.0046309466,0.0070633036,0.003167665,0.0020618592,0.0014874849,0.00033511457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008007143,0.000050199065,0.020643774,0.0005148145,0.00006759243,0.00006879345,0.0025363413,0.001489685,0.00025003872,0.90263337,0.004360391,0.06730498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064252206,0.00016488534,0.16764258,0.0012739717,0.00011892101,0.00020709638,0.004580594,0.002497447,0.0005249877,0.5961516,0.22671328,0.000060465718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007440671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009595059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007560804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034320904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029831466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039985836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036386626","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000258","title":"Human Rights are (Increasingly) Plural: Learning the Changing Taxonomy of Human Rights from Large-scale Text Reveals Information Effects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for Research Computing, University of Pittsburgh; York University; University of Pittsburgh; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Human rights; Plural; Political science; Taxonomy (biology); Amnesty; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013415210805946591,"score_gpt":0.2619111905815332,"score_spread":0.24849597977558663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036386626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091016,0.0071082464,0.027518574,0.015541024,0.0002739764,0.00008159818,0.0017111218,0.00017187274,0.03849191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900614,0.0022847094,0.005072805,0.0005318508,0.00020516598,0.000026243619,0.0005267285,0.000041662366,0.0012494664],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522215,0.002576596,0.0002790631,0.000715842,0.0009918162,0.00021460885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463677,0.035035383,0.010416096,0.0038392162,0.0037979907,0.00054372166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007039336,0.00018253448,0.0003389447,0.0040573427,0.0008013689,0.0030876305,0.0004445632,0.000644389,0.0035322541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044120137,0.00015379627,0.00025440927,0.0038710786,0.0031447008,0.008733912,0.0015671729,0.0015379493,0.00050256064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045613645,0.00018548296,0.29062897,0.0014495087,0.0002076556,0.00056826835,0.04637605,0.0018604173,0.0113190785,0.0814959,0.014280233,0.55117226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026307898,0.00013025696,0.70817876,0.0010348376,0.00014398673,0.00055515836,0.035541758,0.0114218565,0.005094232,0.1323785,0.10539736,0.0000970263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027806116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004800561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007039336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091091136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006520265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037228048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037544043","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000131","title":"Negativity Biases and Political Ideology: A Comparative Test across 17 Countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Negativity effect; Respondent; Politics; Biology and political orientation; Social psychology; Negativity bias; Psychology; Skin conductance; Work (physics); Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.11386565345052191,"score_gpt":0.4829629239513404,"score_spread":0.3690972705008185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037544043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99719524,0.00070938835,0.00013239255,0.000047624602,0.000024828587,0.000017748864,0.00024745555,0.0000029617736,0.0016223713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988232,0.00026640616,0.00010112659,0.000027340906,0.000020658556,0.00002781557,0.0004716675,0.0000045272673,0.00025710248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971871,0.0015234249,0.00021110284,0.00041711,0.00036612753,0.00029517143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902367,0.004780869,0.0026773547,0.0007218342,0.0009082221,0.00067501573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005150954,0.00035231735,0.0006303819,0.0026690962,0.00038002722,0.0010278411,0.00051236287,0.0005104141,0.004783673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008434825,0.0002234006,0.0012734557,0.0019069258,0.000700435,0.00084612786,0.001393842,0.0003816121,0.0004697147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018453326,0.00014569645,0.9852293,0.00010815559,0.0021629643,0.00016485798,0.0008399562,0.00013706104,0.00045346413,0.00029915592,0.00043686831,0.00817715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006028046,0.00044736566,0.9962047,0.00003705525,0.00038951242,0.00016287495,0.0015122961,0.0001717558,0.00008370853,0.00010412352,0.0008189125,0.000007465251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019900003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018287227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005150954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021893944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026966602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02724117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039444640","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000301","title":"Bridges between Wedges and Frames: Outreach and Compromise in American Political Discourse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Compromise; Politics; Normative; Political science; Stalemate; Political economy; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06642808918993534,"score_gpt":0.43013166675825826,"score_spread":0.36370357756832294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039444640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40891916,0.0104132,0.061545063,0.06841251,0.0007597748,0.00012083728,0.00007885906,0.00011785058,0.44963282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944788,0.0007327691,0.0019102449,0.0007924869,0.0000970797,0.00003778757,0.000012649166,0.00002984355,0.0019083085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763941,0.018124256,0.0005482898,0.0012976435,0.0027125946,0.0009230424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794596,0.016221842,0.0014219927,0.0011854144,0.0010510365,0.00066007074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022806419,0.0005380069,0.00074724,0.0045316485,0.012346765,0.014783608,0.0014793046,0.004603651,0.0028089762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028867325,0.00051989197,0.00047459273,0.004765992,0.061411295,0.019107781,0.011539582,0.00648637,0.00029038472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021688664,0.000011113675,0.00048339088,0.000049762926,0.000005632851,0.0000660045,0.20111512,0.000089332534,0.0001994015,0.7898026,0.0008102781,0.0073457365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000262874,0.00003878851,0.0016579184,0.00044012428,0.00002090612,0.00018196278,0.20500198,0.0008025918,0.0004657354,0.6897084,0.10161424,0.000041028452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004005177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004532255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022806419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006415491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034198768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12061334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094506402","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000854","title":"Reconciling the Theoretical and Empirical Study of International Norms: A New Approach to Measurement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Norm (philosophy); Pace; Scope (computer science); Positive economics; Lesbian; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Econometrics; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.16853042756360168,"score_gpt":0.436788907835957,"score_spread":0.2682584802723553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094506402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10020388,0.019301524,0.6685678,0.07175896,0.0019393887,0.00039453036,0.0003974363,0.00017979133,0.13725668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969935,0.0047466247,0.093086205,0.0025239238,0.000813303,0.00067803566,0.00014480486,0.00007344417,0.0009401652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88898754,0.094514474,0.0028023657,0.004221325,0.008694153,0.0007801189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82186514,0.13141204,0.013277334,0.017893529,0.0139652835,0.0015866477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07766878,0.0005824538,0.0012653141,0.0077185626,0.0021240877,0.009279137,0.0024218329,0.0018335371,0.002673522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15040746,0.00042416912,0.00070572604,0.010074215,0.029491572,0.015354415,0.0065750424,0.005962595,0.00029611486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015476902,0.00005506266,0.0069122994,0.00022436648,0.000054675336,0.000025149708,0.008962279,0.00065228494,0.000106043786,0.9344528,0.0011241732,0.047415428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011357375,0.00005715672,0.006883495,0.0011575357,0.000038782167,0.000062118575,0.008287685,0.0044384436,0.00018905003,0.954903,0.02393581,0.000035585803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033069237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033484194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07766878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052193683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007054023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41075665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125285252","doi":"10.1017/s0003055407070268","title":"Federalism, Liberalism, and the Separation of Loyalties","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Loyalty; Liberalism; Dual federalism; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Tiebout model; Political economy; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.018717840428065836,"score_gpt":0.39028078143205797,"score_spread":0.3715629410039921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125285252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1013212,0.06746099,0.020051504,0.076428086,0.00082415034,0.000036384394,0.00009069251,0.00003588308,0.7337511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971291,0.0107737025,0.0016303932,0.0033813391,0.0005975808,0.000028547971,0.000048513044,0.000010528366,0.012238472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974655,0.0010316975,0.00008407033,0.0002511725,0.0007434579,0.00042414552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705315,0.0012871306,0.00066045823,0.0002525877,0.00042429625,0.00032226293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022685358,0.00009734423,0.00025489143,0.0012341869,0.0021803468,0.0032850837,0.00041909344,0.0011829124,0.0021281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038237607,0.00011856504,0.00026774002,0.0017802278,0.012581957,0.0029953427,0.0015637015,0.0018303599,0.00018206795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004611754,0.000006108241,0.00073146285,0.00003044867,0.0000055879814,0.000013701221,0.0002410047,0.00011266175,0.000028579389,0.9904587,0.001584621,0.006782464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008989518,0.000016182199,0.005590307,0.00007903549,0.000009839217,0.00006592223,0.0005613541,0.00027978377,0.00009269611,0.9278033,0.065484054,0.000008617955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006332197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109899435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006332197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005085414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046478137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03689742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125598908","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000698","title":"Can Economic Assistance Shape Combatant Support in Wartime? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Princeton University; Yale University; United States Institute of Peace; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Combatant; Livelihood; Cash; Psychological intervention; Cash transfers; Government (linguistics); Competence (human resources); Economic growth; Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.028578616464115632,"score_gpt":0.37575028468914884,"score_spread":0.3471716682250332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125598908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6604104,0.3144455,0.00043330656,0.0075168894,0.0007251407,0.00051864405,0.0005856452,0.00002410492,0.01534037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.784317,0.20927703,0.0007838096,0.002447712,0.0003847943,0.00044851916,0.00028778505,0.00001183473,0.0020413897],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842536,0.0011935171,0.00006528427,0.00008680104,0.00009329041,0.00013567333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967127,0.0024103543,0.00049790065,0.00010591468,0.00014206077,0.00013114828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003689004,0.0003552479,0.00074214535,0.00031724223,0.0003446688,0.00071487675,0.00070025417,0.0009014532,0.0072834175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076889903,0.00022399524,0.000902475,0.0004900673,0.0010336092,0.00042260217,0.00041777495,0.0010326451,0.00043706206],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034221966,0.024353363,0.02001898,0.04102431,0.008807488,0.00024811382,0.0017108854,0.0017168896,0.0055598402,0.012298443,0.011990292,0.8380495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06213171,0.10358648,0.5093263,0.036752783,0.03243202,0.0005682283,0.0055582835,0.0016652563,0.009040279,0.020037439,0.2186714,0.00022987285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075022043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012511402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075022043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007623527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013687517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024365485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138544629","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000022","title":"Gone For Good: Deindustrialization, White Voter Backlash, and US Presidential Voting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deindustrialization; Voting; White (mutation); Politics; Presidential election; Presidential system; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Economy","score_opus":0.0499160684999227,"score_gpt":0.40280328893155415,"score_spread":0.35288722043163145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138544629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9128431,0.033148933,0.0005221938,0.0123104425,0.00030358852,0.000025759657,0.0003534019,0.000010676933,0.04048193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922438,0.00510246,0.0000776091,0.0007158534,0.00020682381,0.000008347194,0.00015766559,0.00000387152,0.0014835092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825853,0.0009970866,0.00007043063,0.0001462614,0.00020395449,0.000323685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662113,0.0008718507,0.0015523095,0.0001187434,0.0003691775,0.00046683764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031975491,0.00012024948,0.00028590555,0.0010036492,0.00074164616,0.0011743053,0.00039678602,0.00057461305,0.0049652364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071695126,0.000096911324,0.00033070118,0.0015112888,0.0011342148,0.0008314403,0.0008357538,0.00076153484,0.000342198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000893907,0.00037631212,0.6641082,0.00088886725,0.00054730644,0.00026023432,0.0037730986,0.0005358268,0.0005384018,0.035113286,0.017005278,0.27595934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000360033,0.000203648,0.9577307,0.00021755633,0.000105807376,0.00014997357,0.0041530803,0.00027202375,0.00021230902,0.0060711564,0.030834423,0.000013230509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007250813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019602586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007250813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007346576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007528738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016910493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152852493","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000137","title":"Whose News? Class-Biased Economic Reporting in the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic welfare; Inequality; Yield (engineering); Economics; Welfare; Economic inequality; Media bias; Distribution (mathematics); Tone (literature); State (computer science); Income distribution; Accountability; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.0745070153776287,"score_gpt":0.4409771131478305,"score_spread":0.3664700977702018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152852493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89758986,0.026154174,0.0004358855,0.019911377,0.0006510228,0.00004369374,0.0044148713,0.000020375051,0.050778694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857078,0.009167067,0.00012547466,0.0018149444,0.000795009,0.00001871755,0.0012323725,0.000012046652,0.0011265808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974464,0.0015141732,0.00021089734,0.00021768367,0.00045088417,0.00015995455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661176,0.015278976,0.0132729225,0.0013710747,0.0033248365,0.0006345964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007304458,0.00014087906,0.000305399,0.0029293646,0.0005583035,0.0024582678,0.00036798138,0.00055556465,0.0024280353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028577555,0.00016989006,0.00019365286,0.004844065,0.0008759413,0.0012650936,0.0011009224,0.0007548508,0.00035307388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006928002,0.00013958274,0.7669153,0.0011630709,0.0005825723,0.00027295426,0.012449426,0.00042350614,0.0006742086,0.008779035,0.047532007,0.16037549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034763892,0.000041971347,0.95296115,0.0007394944,0.00017061022,0.00010849797,0.0054550464,0.00046520607,0.00037660857,0.0017286447,0.037890755,0.000027288366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016635496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024716578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016635496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009907231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004303862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038630128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155318470","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000198","title":"Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Normative; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Inequality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.030654754532410056,"score_gpt":0.3456204243549922,"score_spread":0.3149656698225821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155318470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10652523,0.06596103,0.041526135,0.16543527,0.0013769997,0.0000449788,0.000087297514,0.000048067766,0.618995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977778,0.0067891204,0.001952466,0.0041702967,0.0006247656,0.000033140866,0.00002395019,0.000017465674,0.008610758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973158,0.0016449048,0.000058500926,0.00029025573,0.00043727903,0.00025324596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977708,0.00128913,0.00035911571,0.00020665159,0.00022166462,0.00015260627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004043923,0.00018013171,0.0003250241,0.00070501846,0.002390574,0.004283251,0.0005972195,0.0017767932,0.0025282681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042282254,0.00013290576,0.00028316135,0.0009016736,0.019944986,0.0066268216,0.0026759708,0.0032076978,0.00022263384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035328449,0.0000019792194,0.00008240258,0.00001189515,0.0000011695818,0.000007793997,0.0004295843,0.0000461442,0.000016761627,0.99633384,0.00064120046,0.0024235328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007343149,0.000007734285,0.000555859,0.00009669068,0.0000031081584,0.000037483558,0.0005296209,0.0002256167,0.00007559052,0.9628619,0.035595145,0.000003907508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030020473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035286993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004283251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003141232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026144201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022791386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167481417","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000472","title":"Jeremy Bentham: Pauperism, Colonialism, and Imperialism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Opposition (politics); Indigenous; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Indirect rule; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics","score_opus":0.030311144456776785,"score_gpt":0.37733644353244655,"score_spread":0.34702529907566976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167481417","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002865505,0.89280915,0.00025683796,0.066881254,0.002452784,0.00000476527,0.000014223322,0.0000056445183,0.0347099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16572067,0.77215296,0.00047537146,0.023321245,0.007882515,0.000033994573,0.000031856864,0.000020527108,0.030360965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874324,0.00075110386,0.000038033737,0.000095178475,0.0002612838,0.00011122885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839634,0.0010569303,0.00013414609,0.000050514485,0.00021351504,0.00014853122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010592903,0.00036178282,0.00043570346,0.0016372527,0.0026968047,0.0035216943,0.0005632736,0.0024220634,0.0023821013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002898704,0.00021588437,0.00017935516,0.002432207,0.006746392,0.0030715873,0.0017510526,0.0031067007,0.00034673407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040841845,0.000033346732,0.0011412454,0.001315262,0.000030394414,0.0005961466,0.016460933,0.00028988367,0.0001543962,0.68435466,0.19796795,0.09761494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071646114,0.000014200131,0.0026592296,0.0011444498,0.000009329749,0.0003296405,0.003210471,0.00007154585,0.0000692984,0.045585435,0.9468873,0.0000119614615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036473125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046362843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036473125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036964018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039741606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07252163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173795390","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000502","title":"Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Impact of Light on Environment and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; American Political Science Association; Yale University","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Civil Conflict; Matching (statistics); Development economics; Spanish Civil War; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.01272647097062077,"score_gpt":0.34329740793553254,"score_spread":0.33057093696491174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173795390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9028746,0.039892547,0.009676918,0.005669689,0.00047436194,0.00038457374,0.0064048213,0.000075101314,0.034547374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900788,0.004698892,0.0017263219,0.0008413754,0.000096974516,0.00016738461,0.00090736314,0.000033537443,0.0014493766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936119,0.0037130967,0.0005190042,0.00072397344,0.0006505395,0.000781482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989129,0.006193837,0.002299424,0.0008568421,0.0011035693,0.00041730647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006963341,0.0005751761,0.0013669912,0.0034633311,0.00052568555,0.0014172129,0.0006634314,0.0004899106,0.006763697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012416931,0.00020547226,0.0035855388,0.0042400807,0.0013962721,0.0016837688,0.0034352231,0.0012423623,0.00047643392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006822019,0.00013158938,0.88188034,0.0059691267,0.010617707,0.0008616211,0.00659286,0.0025071127,0.00094097236,0.014610343,0.005807061,0.0693991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049738548,0.0005304939,0.94886297,0.0012168058,0.004664455,0.00023736244,0.012014431,0.0013366729,0.00053584966,0.0037597422,0.026753986,0.00003748202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032378115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03382579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032378115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008326922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012680726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064379275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196577388","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000824","title":"The Elite–Citizen Gap in International Organization Legitimacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; Universität Duisburg-Essen; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; American Political Science Association; Universiteit Maastricht; University of Toronto; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Vetenskapsrådet; Yale University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Elite; Political science; Democracy; Perception; Political economy; Democratic legitimacy; Publics; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.020403139223152643,"score_gpt":0.37584526623116354,"score_spread":0.3554421270080109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196577388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95108104,0.0039337366,0.0008038069,0.0049882643,0.000030190125,0.00001117104,0.00006973402,0.0000060838493,0.039075922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887353,0.0006797837,0.00005647882,0.00018552846,0.000024103032,0.000003994198,0.000016201218,0.0000014171624,0.0001591017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414414,0.0028898672,0.00025954444,0.00043013398,0.001431766,0.0008446219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796214,0.013972634,0.00358295,0.00072926393,0.0012601812,0.0008335412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012753266,0.000071684706,0.0003787348,0.0026228202,0.0011191687,0.0030430602,0.0003646231,0.0006801478,0.002185647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021499408,0.0000996841,0.00014457852,0.0031367468,0.0034852107,0.0034641577,0.0025682442,0.00087184284,0.00010708813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023799,0.00019673667,0.5077823,0.0007140405,0.00016025314,0.0004138201,0.13458769,0.0004343339,0.0010081119,0.15877621,0.004844486,0.19084401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026917494,0.00014821517,0.8317562,0.0006942881,0.00005245759,0.0002357585,0.098244935,0.00051573344,0.00026882772,0.03501706,0.033012275,0.000027290376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003606126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006084329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012753266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012017408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014692071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06744653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204887615","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000927","title":"Benevolent Policies: Bureaucratic Politics and the International Dimensions of Social Policy Expansion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; International Development Research Centre; Fulbright Canada; McMaster University; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Technocracy; Bureaucracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Incentive; Population; Social policy; Political science; Public policy; Political economy; Public administration; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.029586460722846663,"score_gpt":0.40651658588130685,"score_spread":0.3769301251584602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204887615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16813931,0.012501034,0.011048956,0.10398922,0.00044944382,0.000100846104,0.000053541648,0.000048613594,0.703669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881705,0.0023328282,0.00086657767,0.0036990414,0.00020601306,0.00006982961,0.000016581795,0.00002581319,0.0046128286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98437876,0.0096953735,0.0004546744,0.00086011627,0.0020951536,0.00251594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98969156,0.0059978548,0.001907803,0.0008596247,0.00074857124,0.0007944377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012560341,0.0002842891,0.0003145765,0.0026406178,0.005746466,0.009960573,0.0006868751,0.002145201,0.0040718834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012546421,0.00031005725,0.00036345646,0.0038036646,0.03055721,0.007985384,0.0051854732,0.0052251993,0.00027670266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009654039,0.000029160597,0.0023706574,0.00004542997,0.0000065740965,0.000048750215,0.0081835585,0.00029450035,0.0001099388,0.9758143,0.0017401318,0.011347387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055928565,0.00006849088,0.05390648,0.0010406275,0.000034758013,0.00019640144,0.038859867,0.0018240239,0.0006290998,0.61749446,0.2858251,0.00006483436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005803341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007432269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012560341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011682137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075164237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08476025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206353349","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421001337","title":"Enfranchisement and Incarceration after the 1965 Voting Rights Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Johns Hopkins University; Harvard University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Prison; Voting; Mass incarceration; State (computer science); Politics; Voter registration; Race (biology); Political science; Power (physics); Criminology; White (mutation); Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.023242411363063847,"score_gpt":0.3692436108557238,"score_spread":0.34600119949265995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206353349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556433,0.012192167,0.00023335005,0.0038574415,0.00013879857,0.00002778898,0.000329579,0.000005511669,0.02757216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942036,0.0029583622,0.00006624212,0.00027150387,0.00007689462,0.000007682326,0.0001334362,0.0000017738945,0.0022804688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982085,0.00076371565,0.00007649034,0.00013153825,0.00032629076,0.0004934134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664587,0.000997707,0.0012740699,0.00014323722,0.0005547314,0.00038431096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022453633,0.00006592151,0.00021074215,0.0008454376,0.0007406884,0.0007370091,0.00029726443,0.000389115,0.0016681063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069861882,0.00006974967,0.00016509031,0.0014252531,0.00081696734,0.00035715546,0.00048345164,0.0005676421,0.0001473192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006803867,0.00027381862,0.6960785,0.00060131244,0.00023064505,0.00052670506,0.01377165,0.0009649075,0.0014236487,0.077302486,0.011609176,0.19653681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126235645,0.00013584987,0.9618696,0.000089375484,0.00003304598,0.0000731504,0.0028278895,0.000115245595,0.0002778342,0.0012001458,0.033358186,0.0000070945275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048914235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093938574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048914235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016117065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016017541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097259045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224274650","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422000351","title":"The Competing Influence of Policy Content and Political Cues: Cross-Border Evidence from the United States and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Ideology; Foreign policy; Politics; Refugee; Test (biology); Prime minister; Political science; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Political economy; Public relations; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05506414671953489,"score_gpt":0.44952537483500427,"score_spread":0.39446122811546935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224274650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770658,0.001927738,0.00016991499,0.0017099811,0.000026764474,0.000044922068,0.0004381254,0.000004637389,0.018612219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584466,0.0012043808,0.0001888923,0.00049170566,0.000009958477,0.000018221612,0.00043968312,0.000011807041,0.0017907252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946167,0.0015036756,0.00020782597,0.0005844437,0.0018562621,0.0012311045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96950233,0.009930224,0.0031550755,0.0017828856,0.0132815335,0.0023480868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008064314,0.00035673744,0.00096240273,0.002064502,0.010053527,0.0042478573,0.0017634145,0.0010839006,0.0046550413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029166084,0.00033349555,0.00051907724,0.0052681738,0.005076026,0.0013958518,0.0027691163,0.0015458498,0.00034307866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013189518,0.00050844596,0.8040605,0.0006232587,0.00064646435,0.00049732905,0.10624788,0.00051049417,0.001021409,0.010097225,0.010029264,0.064438745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011098521,0.00008683742,0.8921589,0.00043723703,0.00030250385,0.00008571465,0.088338345,0.0004730817,0.00046293653,0.0009985813,0.016462177,0.00008260126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9898879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99570364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032799717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032799717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044204332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23797977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224307008","doi":"10.1017/s000305542200020x","title":"Intrinsic Social Incentives in State and Non-State Armed Groups","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Folke Bernadotteakademin; Sveriges Regering; University of Cambridge; York University; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Group cohesiveness; Incentive; Cohesion (chemistry); State (computer science); Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Public economics; Public relations; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025519686647621827,"score_gpt":0.28338569851527545,"score_spread":0.2578660118676536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224307008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528675,0.000488796,0.0034737166,0.0018627783,0.000027626258,0.000047126825,0.00014274607,0.000009362314,0.041080453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.000104988685,0.0002399219,0.000065861655,0.00001167674,0.000014777431,0.000024645838,0.0000014253196,0.000969563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976718,0.0013433752,0.00008712508,0.00020855959,0.0002494368,0.00043974898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98718774,0.0060477327,0.004103739,0.0005736246,0.000614571,0.0014726617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004311768,0.0001666644,0.00038132083,0.0011564526,0.0010020355,0.0023563213,0.00040594456,0.00094471406,0.006658705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014935252,0.00023498923,0.00022566858,0.00077587663,0.0022343486,0.0016869475,0.001851276,0.00055817736,0.00032606814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037398614,0.00069302815,0.47176662,0.0002765987,0.000286954,0.0004919829,0.0060831355,0.008921315,0.0015279152,0.44515637,0.0031685203,0.06125354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009669858,0.00031862257,0.76952046,0.00018605874,0.00008842169,0.00026439186,0.008010988,0.015094475,0.00042397995,0.18969415,0.01623756,0.00006420869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023340709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045837113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006658705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016011547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008883808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022803068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233848186","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000384","title":"PSR volume 105 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Geography; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0420395405189841,"score_gpt":0.2502171601135049,"score_spread":0.20817761959452083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233848186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010994879,0.0028801295,0.00050270674,0.006174728,0.009308647,0.000117536,0.002665537,0.001431569,0.9758195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032447698,0.0017688053,0.00022768565,0.0014535615,0.0026271658,0.000029577368,0.0011857419,0.00025188713,0.9892107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937516,0.000042585983,0.000027527693,0.00012460003,0.00036980846,0.000060372735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874926,0.00017663745,0.000052501236,0.00017569879,0.00057709275,0.00026879262],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069639063,0.000836411,0.0008589922,0.0017974525,0.0011824651,0.004381527,0.000681423,0.0021166862,0.84871143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018860858,0.00039082958,0.00074622914,0.0013008397,0.00065678055,0.0013677927,0.0012110728,0.0020520536,0.8150544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004020773,0.00005767341,0.00021071706,0.00015749007,0.000008557259,0.00006745032,0.000012040368,0.00005228402,0.0006615102,0.001316578,0.9320574,0.06535816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096785125,0.000020677386,0.00087135367,0.00007666581,0.000004413693,0.00007903572,0.00001563157,0.000071811955,0.00028222168,0.0003616489,0.9982035,0.0000033535305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022579494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031081338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15128857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012782966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017552376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2157948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239124855","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000639","title":"PSR volume 107 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Essex; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.022148374088763596,"score_gpt":0.24453845752024037,"score_spread":0.22239008343147676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239124855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009322629,0.0035908294,0.00045467247,0.0064619337,0.01099688,0.00012512963,0.0034341055,0.0014486003,0.9725556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027653584,0.002483532,0.00023572285,0.0015441453,0.003016608,0.00003326361,0.0016679585,0.00030143117,0.98795205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999258,0.00005042979,0.000032553184,0.00013148919,0.00045884086,0.000068751964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842715,0.00021564068,0.00006708,0.00021268251,0.00074833544,0.00032917046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007356346,0.00089222536,0.0009457438,0.0021702307,0.0011966319,0.004939984,0.0007937454,0.0021911897,0.84356785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020908874,0.00042844834,0.0007342537,0.0016523147,0.0006741924,0.0014456187,0.0013616489,0.0021868548,0.8221851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029535113,0.000046789115,0.00015725143,0.00014794356,0.0000065763065,0.000049985767,0.000008925048,0.000044301065,0.00047547877,0.001018066,0.9440798,0.053935412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085506,0.000016194015,0.0007754536,0.00009103007,0.0000039139136,0.00006548358,0.000015121873,0.00006752045,0.00025638542,0.00034854104,0.9983485,0.0000033366491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002779751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003983944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15643215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015293303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024196368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22313142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241918637","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000483","title":"The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application—ERRATUM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Politics; Action (physics); Law; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.014419678397000153,"score_gpt":0.29861810210256073,"score_spread":0.2841984237055606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241918637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032536473,0.035272803,0.035731923,0.41223776,0.07119526,0.0004169401,0.015707053,0.0005867206,0.39631504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4635244,0.043615825,0.06586325,0.033837106,0.023715345,0.0011564338,0.009259691,0.0006063127,0.35842162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980123,0.00080245157,0.00018137551,0.00017661032,0.0007718563,0.00005530264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761678,0.018778209,0.00082367874,0.0005044071,0.003475248,0.00025075235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004844313,0.00043240262,0.00047351271,0.0030241753,0.0022622375,0.004533557,0.001010271,0.002659602,0.024696443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038081136,0.00032053317,0.0005010217,0.0067649563,0.0015279993,0.0053193,0.0014393815,0.002089473,0.003186045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024127323,0.000027284645,0.0015288808,0.00016993517,0.000014821691,0.00014218561,0.00054782064,0.0011264029,0.000017034854,0.114481315,0.8444459,0.037474297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101269914,0.000056827375,0.011156489,0.0016314253,0.00012655178,0.00034003003,0.0038096416,0.014182506,0.00031552362,0.21379831,0.7543721,0.00010931775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039092988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067147374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039092988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030137526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003061057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08261782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245611892","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000341","title":"PSR volume 104 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Physics; Mathematics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01880895631381177,"score_gpt":0.2529212892124167,"score_spread":0.23411233289860492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245611892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012221233,0.0026287113,0.00045748492,0.0057043424,0.008112103,0.000107809174,0.0022292398,0.0012074815,0.97833073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029452771,0.0015244106,0.00021200413,0.0010578606,0.0021712598,0.00002549243,0.00095138734,0.00020917025,0.9909031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942786,0.00004188899,0.000023603088,0.00010833517,0.00034129008,0.00005691852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998818,0.00017670318,0.0000476875,0.00016618213,0.000553646,0.00023768694],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006558516,0.0008291237,0.0008551251,0.0017845928,0.0011541047,0.0038715329,0.0006827511,0.0019825348,0.84545153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018189057,0.00038751934,0.0006861603,0.0013332842,0.0006596492,0.0013193161,0.0011134949,0.0019453521,0.797231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043305794,0.000060170547,0.00023505141,0.0001605806,0.000008505998,0.000067051835,0.000012729658,0.00006131594,0.0006763892,0.001409614,0.9258054,0.071459904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010418349,0.000022549028,0.000951368,0.00006751628,0.0000047527537,0.000079190206,0.000016768028,0.00008844802,0.00030766262,0.00038374017,0.9980641,0.0000035566484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002441932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033868111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15454847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012932762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017059393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22044462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248762449","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402224338","title":"Public Health Policies and Social Inequality By Charles F. Andrain. New York: New York University Press, 1998. 292p. $50.00. The Politics of Health in Europe. By Richard Freeman. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2000. 164p. $69.95. Governing the Health Care State: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany By Michael Moran. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999. 196p. $69.95 cloth, $24.95 paper. Accidental Logics: The Dynamics of Change in the Health Care Arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada By Carolyn Hughes Tuohy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. 312p. $45.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Inequality; Health care; Political science; Public health; Sociology; Public administration; Media studies; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.0824474725563394,"score_gpt":0.30569390592857004,"score_spread":0.22324643337223066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248762449","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026703486,0.93351066,0.0006194067,0.029212782,0.0031499898,0.00002886805,0.0008992465,0.000083074076,0.032228958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0087898215,0.8424633,0.0019504912,0.009466168,0.003912495,0.00019412136,0.0010126589,0.0002365454,0.13197432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995333,0.00009631833,0.000044026307,0.00009320726,0.00017356043,0.000059593385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989729,0.000495244,0.00015634648,0.000053457796,0.00019944701,0.00012261354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012851867,0.0030614499,0.0017266177,0.0040558632,0.00126058,0.0021657785,0.0015284183,0.0034746446,0.06933323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025620635,0.0013531292,0.0006608567,0.0064793704,0.0026254647,0.0060042217,0.0017746363,0.0050118626,0.03411726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026119906,0.000020787023,0.00032780188,0.0005203233,0.00002272152,0.000056963218,0.00038543495,0.00019245116,0.00006539066,0.012528209,0.92125356,0.0646002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019600899,0.00002024861,0.003034673,0.0024318364,0.000017911207,0.00023448681,0.0004177995,0.00009085544,0.00004963184,0.01865818,0.9749962,0.000028389159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022809815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04435132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022835918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024772296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23194277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255786407","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000196","title":"PSR volume 106 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Essex; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Physics; Mathematics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028072915907814824,"score_gpt":0.26132204964587985,"score_spread":0.23324913373806502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255786407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010350646,0.0031191048,0.00052079506,0.006545323,0.011498168,0.00012729483,0.0029559252,0.0014228793,0.9727754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002779317,0.001814152,0.00023657775,0.0013278525,0.0028537584,0.000028441293,0.00125558,0.00026440524,0.9894399],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932134,0.00004603126,0.000029806673,0.00012995525,0.0004128918,0.000060016733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986401,0.00018582788,0.000056209345,0.00020108907,0.00062470377,0.0002920039],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071196916,0.0008682726,0.00086375227,0.0019053166,0.0012232064,0.004451413,0.0007072675,0.0020857966,0.839802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019829802,0.0004105858,0.0007208298,0.0014056969,0.0006538146,0.0014400458,0.0013598015,0.0020444044,0.80855286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035227462,0.000051082076,0.0001851983,0.00014656274,0.0000070649635,0.000061228726,0.000010182195,0.000054379077,0.000635208,0.0011690067,0.93839,0.05925481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087533135,0.000017193603,0.00076280657,0.00007540271,0.0000037303041,0.000070955306,0.000013748875,0.00007227692,0.00026788062,0.00035637344,0.99834764,0.000003246163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020446621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031091087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16019797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012532305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001768334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22850287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280536100","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422000430","title":"The Effect of Pregnancy on Engagement with Politics. Toward a Model of the Political Consequences of the Earliest Stages of Parenthood","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; European University Institute; McGill University","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Politics; Childbirth; Pregnancy; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Law","score_opus":0.051468747983472694,"score_gpt":0.3715990586448643,"score_spread":0.32013031066139164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280536100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95175976,0.005535316,0.0012005711,0.0045966054,0.00006172697,0.000026298967,0.0004762573,0.000011258999,0.03633216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782,0.00067617453,0.00014044807,0.00012566414,0.000014427642,0.000010892362,0.00006938827,0.000004952672,0.001138102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785125,0.0013534267,0.000041043568,0.00022258624,0.00013667313,0.00039500152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989442,0.0066257124,0.0023582645,0.00041412812,0.00030477357,0.0008550848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027431874,0.00019588003,0.00032913827,0.00068245217,0.0006443725,0.0019523035,0.00039177408,0.00063442165,0.006865976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010663629,0.00017490302,0.0005058631,0.0010103856,0.0016481432,0.0009967169,0.0016204602,0.0012254542,0.0005012755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000737921,0.00023424625,0.9089366,0.00014405602,0.00016462401,0.00047305148,0.016566878,0.00052438636,0.0014978192,0.024765294,0.0013444341,0.0446107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052520295,0.000091266236,0.9911726,0.00006709704,0.000041295716,0.000060940034,0.0032212788,0.00025735723,0.00016087672,0.0020783187,0.0028380672,0.0000056839995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008826364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014598683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008826364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009625656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008386856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022969007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295690925","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422000193","title":"“Let Our Ballots Secure What Our Bullets Have Won”: Union Veterans and the Making of Radical Reconstruction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Suffrage; Victory; Spanish Civil War; Political science; Political economy; Law; White (mutation); Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.037764574136338394,"score_gpt":0.387470336217853,"score_spread":0.3497057620815146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295690925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23991561,0.40812263,0.0015736283,0.14758094,0.0025000216,0.00006696079,0.00014355149,0.00002438064,0.20007229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89250886,0.09089287,0.0003564809,0.005377947,0.00110327,0.00002624471,0.000089121415,0.000015591291,0.009629508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962429,0.0029941685,0.000051695726,0.000076717624,0.0002665598,0.00036810306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883527,0.0005982383,0.00018358498,0.000033722117,0.00019938455,0.00014975255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034420306,0.000119418066,0.0003307822,0.00088901084,0.0015260646,0.002353607,0.00047305733,0.00096442946,0.00396034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005397249,0.00012069105,0.00016854538,0.0012550565,0.003132119,0.0016730991,0.00093658577,0.0011837848,0.00054869335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030864886,0.0002702818,0.017534643,0.0017936914,0.0001803635,0.0001362704,0.011326149,0.00076339,0.00028465225,0.43437243,0.08763197,0.44539747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011770013,0.00048282833,0.07959904,0.0030111587,0.00009436903,0.0002091571,0.03771575,0.00040361058,0.00036436392,0.07752306,0.8004401,0.00003887136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071313074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019302962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071313074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016841831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021829489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018203437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318217801","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422001459","title":"How Do Politicians Bargain? Evidence from Ultimatum Games with Legislators in Five Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vlaamse regering; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universität Konstanz; University of Toronto; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Ultimatum game; Politics; Legislation; Democracy; Political economy; Field (mathematics); Collective bargaining; Bargaining power; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.041925520807110456,"score_gpt":0.3884494003738335,"score_spread":0.34652387956672304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318217801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797166,0.001435111,0.001871654,0.0014908627,0.00006326266,0.000055911532,0.00011571491,0.000013986937,0.015236833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972894,0.0006581048,0.00064038014,0.000366755,0.000022566062,0.000042323107,0.00012857358,0.0000083115165,0.0008436456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98324823,0.0129321655,0.0005713864,0.0010678212,0.00096149166,0.0012188368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9256514,0.053264514,0.013287722,0.0028031492,0.0023340357,0.002659228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028086286,0.00051351794,0.0012167854,0.0013370769,0.0027478756,0.004137452,0.0016918886,0.0024826864,0.006474369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063676804,0.0007992857,0.0007604909,0.0024112999,0.0035892292,0.002864289,0.0027621763,0.002811169,0.0013009958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007438914,0.0046226764,0.6152192,0.0015210158,0.0022566004,0.0007633293,0.027315559,0.032980904,0.0022569385,0.118639074,0.013608589,0.1733772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026719486,0.0025354647,0.75840133,0.00070522795,0.0010392881,0.0003733896,0.041650936,0.05085298,0.00226744,0.09912516,0.04000946,0.00036735335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010880203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017663071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028086286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017175595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010973425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14853626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319983953","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000011","title":"Slavery and Oratory: Frederick Douglass in the History of Rhetoric","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Appropriation; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04298511317701308,"score_gpt":0.3577840573018557,"score_spread":0.3147989441248426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319983953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030273171,0.4841963,0.0016286866,0.2726726,0.003091544,0.000017740043,0.000044982127,0.000030629104,0.20804432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79371625,0.13266017,0.00085212203,0.030492328,0.0037287003,0.000035582354,0.000021850998,0.000037043395,0.038455892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953081,0.0032337906,0.000092874696,0.00023228762,0.0007141125,0.00041881375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922471,0.0064715124,0.00037946602,0.00013167017,0.0005682634,0.00020194806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005651625,0.00028099644,0.00034797605,0.0032571137,0.0056737186,0.0065057427,0.00080583786,0.0034912557,0.0014513348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008742636,0.0002100693,0.00018466004,0.0029380217,0.018551668,0.0065748026,0.0014930377,0.003743469,0.00030309014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021153206,0.000012930128,0.00022534106,0.00021533141,0.0000055831306,0.00015079838,0.016303662,0.000118834316,0.000086535794,0.9174158,0.050841946,0.014602033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017495791,0.000017606077,0.0011077529,0.0009689561,0.000011029734,0.00025629753,0.0099791,0.00014346692,0.00024918347,0.13741414,0.8498077,0.000027240418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032534685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03738523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032534685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014289212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070006787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10367602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323363761","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422001496","title":"Evidence of Caste-Class Discrimination from a Conjoint Analysis of Law Enforcement Officers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Vanderbilt University; Humanity United; Princeton University; American Political Science Association; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Caste; Officer; Law enforcement; Discretion; Criminology; Class (philosophy); Enforcement; Institution; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.16845298505340883,"score_gpt":0.48349508995483986,"score_spread":0.31504210490143103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323363761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948214,0.0002935375,0.0031641112,0.000117438125,0.000010040527,0.0001940749,0.00014374679,0.0000034048053,0.0012521496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959722,0.00014825878,0.0031933992,0.00007326844,0.0000092129,0.00022195405,0.00012714887,0.000002607679,0.00025197552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91076416,0.06941782,0.0036761486,0.0021168892,0.012484329,0.0015406858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8524138,0.10065153,0.025158605,0.011525096,0.008315003,0.0019360284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07566387,0.0005313516,0.0012228499,0.0026606938,0.0012623828,0.0023497783,0.00092309085,0.0008127623,0.0024397075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12248895,0.00031652322,0.0015061544,0.0036640079,0.0017200878,0.00091413147,0.0023540806,0.0013072031,0.00035442688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003287141,0.0020760337,0.88767004,0.0007360891,0.0022833499,0.00022360114,0.018399417,0.0019149721,0.002200744,0.0019715813,0.00072285254,0.07851419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000163158,0.0030835005,0.95771974,0.00033722163,0.0009082943,0.00043685504,0.019659633,0.008467614,0.0020724565,0.0048976913,0.002105802,0.0001480979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026113742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004181714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07566387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093245826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013167327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40015358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361273008","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000047","title":"An Outbreak of Selective Attribution: Partisanship and Blame in the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Attribution; Blame; Pandemic; Presidential system; Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Competence (human resources); Democracy; Accountability; Public relations; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.17004247132674272,"score_gpt":0.4920785147171844,"score_spread":0.3220360433904417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361273008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8439883,0.054448456,0.0016178692,0.051154457,0.00069715036,0.000038873004,0.00013615155,0.00002466704,0.04789405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984151,0.012197489,0.0001885412,0.002208741,0.0003628617,0.000009389305,0.000053927633,0.000008433505,0.0008195409],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626786,0.0026421412,0.00008467414,0.00016291167,0.00038902476,0.00045341268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98326415,0.0099952,0.0040319706,0.00063014013,0.0013663408,0.00071224285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00966686,0.00013716341,0.00032655842,0.00084113935,0.0018885856,0.0021145912,0.0005473347,0.0018552489,0.0024155786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020229697,0.0001895169,0.00037027203,0.0012345697,0.0037475778,0.002501742,0.0018759221,0.002753504,0.00017375425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073081075,0.00052802183,0.32173637,0.0017542335,0.00049308507,0.0016342687,0.06796782,0.001751391,0.0008120901,0.09012498,0.059342887,0.45312408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005000906,0.00029965318,0.76831335,0.0021692042,0.00018183449,0.0013178324,0.07722772,0.0017004922,0.0005888489,0.03369545,0.11436085,0.000094784664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011054156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02421625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011054156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028103027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015185912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051123857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362470474","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000242","title":"Diversity Matters: The Election of Asian Americans to U.S. State and Federal Legislatures","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles; University of Oxford; Princeton University; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Appeal; Ethnic group; Legislature; Asian americans; Diversity (politics); Political science; State (computer science); Crossover; Representation (politics); Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03858129230010217,"score_gpt":0.38132866379506575,"score_spread":0.3427473714949636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362470474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446552,0.004268841,0.0001928806,0.005325754,0.0001817253,0.00003150708,0.002400147,0.000012195405,0.04293174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910658,0.0023724383,0.00007233414,0.00073226413,0.00018548734,0.000017628026,0.0015800059,0.0000083592895,0.0039656446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875903,0.0004940856,0.000064152075,0.00012578911,0.0002472239,0.0003097886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965532,0.00069859525,0.001380234,0.00017952448,0.0005549195,0.00063361257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026356946,0.0001130376,0.0002668745,0.0012596071,0.0009076499,0.0013972471,0.00038687134,0.00036841576,0.006287015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067887935,0.00008797882,0.0003291279,0.0030079843,0.00044516643,0.0010288351,0.0012387083,0.00090793334,0.0009500535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029501616,0.00012376026,0.8543545,0.00029951843,0.00021644797,0.00018625894,0.0065075643,0.00020685444,0.00028850674,0.004683751,0.028796779,0.104040906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013742064,0.000057752226,0.96558005,0.00013010259,0.000059864626,0.00007843149,0.008728396,0.00016035694,0.000158966,0.00078568456,0.024237294,0.000009299764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033985097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099790215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033985097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000832716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012704005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06757456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366416469","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000199","title":"The Global Resonance of Human Rights: What Google Trends Can Tell Us","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Arizona State University","keywords":"Human rights; Appeal; Political science; Legalization; Hegemony; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.03431326730884844,"score_gpt":0.4216020625215802,"score_spread":0.3872887952127318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366416469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47444716,0.17570144,0.0033988433,0.11203019,0.001275997,0.00014061866,0.029881183,0.00015842739,0.20296606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915001,0.061830994,0.001748983,0.007808304,0.00137268,0.00010742047,0.008804934,0.0001998128,0.0031258545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657464,0.0012738707,0.00036106943,0.00040481423,0.0009838577,0.00040173292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802357,0.013541525,0.003168557,0.00086876313,0.0018142931,0.00037114482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042547686,0.00032656122,0.0007820879,0.013503986,0.00077181164,0.007325836,0.000469171,0.0010664109,0.0051656943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022025844,0.00024850835,0.00048857054,0.020492293,0.0029044999,0.012350226,0.002309072,0.0012988441,0.0013518538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051163905,0.00007695712,0.32772255,0.014185818,0.00079355296,0.00095889927,0.093983784,0.0009557486,0.0020677114,0.13479917,0.113963954,0.3099803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032189422,0.00007469903,0.36470863,0.007992038,0.00037262245,0.0006937962,0.09987248,0.0011994642,0.0009219404,0.043497976,0.48051202,0.00012213981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017956108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029784475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017956108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015341128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014536247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035703182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367054635","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000369","title":"Fathers’ Leave Reduces Sexist Attitudes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Wien; University of Oxford; Central European University; Université de Montréal; Syracuse University","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Politics; Parental leave; Power (physics); Gender equality; Political science; Public policy; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Work (physics); Demography","score_opus":0.08756622586899834,"score_gpt":0.45920579204403217,"score_spread":0.3716395661750338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367054635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698712,0.00382715,0.00072670856,0.0034622722,0.00015707499,0.000015128337,0.00012103552,0.000044391993,0.021775117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895393,0.001543504,0.00022887548,0.0006860033,0.000066190914,0.000009984836,0.000059336937,0.000009608652,0.007857189],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994861,0.00029223677,0.000011196545,0.00004769051,0.00010005883,0.00006266534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986022,0.0005165297,0.00043305455,0.00009749951,0.000102081016,0.00024856257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011605031,0.00013630796,0.00017543064,0.0001806789,0.00046723848,0.0004359411,0.0001581493,0.00040441344,0.015178225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029521005,0.000095468706,0.00016364,0.00009039428,0.00031806747,0.00021861486,0.00056530617,0.00052200013,0.00079387054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042783325,0.0069352565,0.30619088,0.0013821392,0.0003831682,0.00094241794,0.023069367,0.0005510066,0.051841285,0.015958557,0.019910768,0.56855685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003969186,0.0060340655,0.8049002,0.00060081197,0.00032511586,0.0010425483,0.008661711,0.00048288202,0.01660086,0.004726852,0.15619606,0.000031935626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015028006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025233713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015178225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022656977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037862003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050776243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372347658","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000291","title":"Coordinated Dis-Coordination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Essex; University of Virginia; York University; Vanderbilt University; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University; University of Michigan; Yale University","keywords":"Mobilization; Collective action; Social movement; Political science; Social mobilization; Field (mathematics); The Internet; Work (physics); Movement (music); Action (physics); Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03362023703644614,"score_gpt":0.41367445097821687,"score_spread":0.38005421394177075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372347658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101577155,0.0065657743,0.099875845,0.010007924,0.0010202742,0.0009387204,0.00052421744,0.00070545945,0.77878463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93900555,0.002946235,0.009525831,0.0013059839,0.00023692592,0.00038018677,0.00029395695,0.00010738668,0.04619785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629766,0.0012586461,0.00021518608,0.0007958466,0.00069081807,0.000741759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954118,0.0010525737,0.0012362269,0.0010053794,0.00064733234,0.0006467351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030945675,0.0005586572,0.00037375465,0.0016354852,0.001986596,0.0036408233,0.0013448725,0.001268435,0.019098623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059503466,0.00031657692,0.00051752717,0.0015802259,0.004539171,0.0036589147,0.0048102317,0.0014061715,0.0019677053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012718549,0.000120336204,0.009162963,0.0012727934,0.00015312248,0.0005802703,0.009189707,0.0042020655,0.004007553,0.743224,0.026491683,0.2014683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009192924,0.00021707946,0.022394499,0.0009903101,0.000110798086,0.00060508214,0.010110227,0.0040375553,0.0022017406,0.20075491,0.75841105,0.000074854644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004856067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065281005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019098623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034265025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06389123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377023886","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000400","title":"The Right to Hunger Strike","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Freie Universität Berlin; Università degli Studi di Genova; University of Toronto; Universiteit Utrecht; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; University College London; Northwestern University; King's College London; Brown University","keywords":"Redress; Grievance; Oppression; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Prison; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.042020982036427866,"score_gpt":0.42444360394406094,"score_spread":0.3824226219076331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377023886","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016005757,0.8928216,0.00065855606,0.031739328,0.0014736992,0.000014071722,0.00004935643,0.00001362001,0.07162925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05356375,0.89732486,0.0006317506,0.028488895,0.002250867,0.000057116136,0.00010704681,0.000014019247,0.017561754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616337,0.0015991253,0.00035258042,0.00028299834,0.0011530931,0.00044884518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970592,0.001466934,0.0005791427,0.00015204349,0.00053357915,0.00020901277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034988238,0.0003144835,0.00069299294,0.0014331022,0.0010102821,0.0026490476,0.0008310617,0.00390898,0.0054734754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066384743,0.00024820145,0.00049044087,0.0009683232,0.005373185,0.002293864,0.0015300114,0.003590754,0.0015349159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004587594,0.000088052526,0.00090105523,0.005086898,0.00008604167,0.00035733447,0.0009958898,0.00030365709,0.00050071516,0.5051786,0.12721787,0.35923797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001958591,0.00005644027,0.0028583915,0.006561607,0.000038789905,0.00071035256,0.00036225628,0.000024743922,0.00014742989,0.031030413,0.9581735,0.000016399012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006502467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009499867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006502467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017834047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006411319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018503785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380610319","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000527","title":"Do Politicians Outside the United States Also Think Voters Are More Conservative than They Really Are?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Universität Konstanz; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Public opinion; Perception; Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Democracy; Phenomenon; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07307672638374667,"score_gpt":0.4176618665538056,"score_spread":0.3445851401700589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380610319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8872817,0.0096161375,0.0025250579,0.023518803,0.00056766794,0.000052940886,0.00046027036,0.000019628016,0.07595779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460876,0.001670883,0.00018060773,0.0022347588,0.00019961393,0.000020209956,0.00013767299,0.0000057869206,0.00094161404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962172,0.0019632473,0.00019117945,0.00048229482,0.0007168,0.00042925656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823893,0.007796867,0.0062376633,0.0006165715,0.0021767565,0.0007829208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070958138,0.00018842967,0.0005564929,0.002125402,0.0011668785,0.0021199046,0.00034047867,0.0007843725,0.004425085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016797189,0.00012963603,0.00025537112,0.0025551987,0.0022585392,0.001388639,0.0008888206,0.0010856196,0.0006393145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052269327,0.00014402888,0.743262,0.0010398779,0.00073405873,0.00028207002,0.047995277,0.0002023438,0.000995632,0.032106854,0.012729477,0.1599856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005461981,0.00015073422,0.891932,0.0005676573,0.0001897547,0.000216888,0.044461615,0.00027607672,0.000416927,0.015259017,0.046433263,0.000041354855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059998888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010712727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070958138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005968943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005295466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037526727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382064905","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000606","title":"Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Maryland, Baltimore County","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Social capital; Political science; Politics; Amendment; First amendment; Democracy; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.055987379608976845,"score_gpt":0.40014877691334616,"score_spread":0.34416139730436934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382064905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96000177,0.0021057588,0.0013479196,0.002864042,0.00004819817,0.000023805891,0.00029168435,0.000013746713,0.03330308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893314,0.00030659663,0.000098760385,0.000057833047,0.00002862957,0.000004901503,0.00007304092,0.0000024137055,0.0004947176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967769,0.001364015,0.00021702633,0.0004658418,0.00063778163,0.00053861836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566438,0.021244572,0.017314743,0.0018349104,0.0013444285,0.0016175131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036760701,0.00010660225,0.00029474826,0.0016948316,0.00065502926,0.0022902763,0.00042028565,0.00051532337,0.0064578764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033703934,0.00012131899,0.00021469276,0.0028566741,0.0022580493,0.0014536171,0.0007394813,0.00080940605,0.00029278046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026193756,0.00033168375,0.81634724,0.00021528648,0.0003936741,0.00027264378,0.0019292065,0.0040276125,0.00078422064,0.089851044,0.003353483,0.082232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004287907,0.00011243904,0.9524941,0.00011173077,0.00012894851,0.00010885365,0.0019901008,0.0016677981,0.00027237498,0.031788476,0.011254005,0.000028254328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069641485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013311739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069641485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013663169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010275523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021603703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382280075","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000576","title":"The View from the Future: Aurobindo Ghose’s Anticolonial Darwinism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Darwinism; Evolutionism; Epistemology; CONTEST; Politics; Colonialism; Naturalism; Creationism; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033523283618842374,"score_gpt":0.39312660030630403,"score_spread":0.35960331668746165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382280075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062464584,0.4393502,0.0013814518,0.34865013,0.00422338,0.00001124978,0.000030269499,0.000025069297,0.14386363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74326736,0.18575002,0.00073593634,0.043998275,0.0043129544,0.000021322396,0.00002833338,0.000036031353,0.021849746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991442,0.0005254492,0.00001669992,0.000080921636,0.00013413267,0.00009866319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906975,0.0005737757,0.000059824157,0.000048814993,0.0001528354,0.00009509453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015189925,0.00015193925,0.00025841556,0.000531979,0.0019061564,0.0033431565,0.00031095362,0.0010542942,0.0011121522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014825184,0.00007186533,0.00013245372,0.00083585293,0.008517305,0.0030604359,0.0014309175,0.0036763304,0.00015901437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007666168,0.000029555822,0.002312758,0.00084886083,0.000028418162,0.00036197947,0.027134068,0.00017359179,0.00053431344,0.8530481,0.03936181,0.0760898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013604676,0.00002727728,0.0035803334,0.0007468595,0.000028460181,0.00038786675,0.017319234,0.00009007836,0.00023125576,0.12786418,0.849695,0.000015835461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067282007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011768817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067282007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019232589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034048478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013954341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383737845","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000539","title":"Women Also Know Stuff: Challenging the Gender Gap in Political Sophistication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Cambridge; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Sophistication; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Simple (philosophy); Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.136754363704399,"score_gpt":0.44642777137277934,"score_spread":0.30967340766838036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383737845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53298146,0.22452733,0.0205697,0.11141813,0.002331454,0.00034930263,0.00084134017,0.000023849405,0.106957495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566907,0.02488804,0.0033005006,0.010914403,0.0011631282,0.00046064553,0.00018457793,0.000028861477,0.002369108],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97263736,0.021683147,0.0007496125,0.0015603359,0.002834593,0.0005349541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93054396,0.056191083,0.0063799024,0.0018035028,0.0043871724,0.0006944895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04229901,0.00031138762,0.000685669,0.003125716,0.0011145211,0.002132621,0.0009781758,0.0010690531,0.0025345024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06091707,0.00023988029,0.0005079262,0.0028615964,0.005127325,0.005830774,0.003737,0.0016007221,0.00034418874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007413161,0.00015145869,0.17559685,0.0065025007,0.001376137,0.0004008205,0.09829954,0.00038016334,0.00091156794,0.24687085,0.016824426,0.45194435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001963648,0.0010641993,0.49178508,0.009369641,0.0010686682,0.0008111486,0.09914445,0.0012476774,0.0014919183,0.15087196,0.24283884,0.00011004231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055604167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011067895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04229901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012502732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002117224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22370124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386544474","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000837","title":"Anarchy, Scarcity, Nature: Rousseau’s Stag Hunt and the Arctic Walrus Hunt Compared","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Queen's University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Queen's University Belfast; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Scarcity; Mainstream; Water scarcity; Leverage (statistics); Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Ecology; Philosophy; Law; Agriculture; Biology; Market economy","score_opus":0.041888288995344095,"score_gpt":0.44702371485286224,"score_spread":0.40513542585751816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386544474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45853922,0.13271973,0.0014300885,0.035749193,0.001033423,0.000026524951,0.00002549233,0.00000875892,0.37046754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729744,0.018715754,0.00027654035,0.0016837247,0.00028472205,0.000010850581,0.000008494055,0.000005791216,0.006039707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838495,0.0010393537,0.000031765794,0.00009714476,0.0001964925,0.00025033506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878985,0.00077927485,0.0001800292,0.000037948554,0.000112372996,0.00010053358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022046713,0.0001592251,0.0002741628,0.0014374411,0.0043240003,0.004334911,0.00056997663,0.0014686112,0.0018917037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022370077,0.00012272583,0.00015706531,0.0017989802,0.017858872,0.0028664009,0.0020343415,0.0014425032,0.0001123822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006953618,0.00005599306,0.008460032,0.00036304462,0.00002953676,0.0009874798,0.26707956,0.00032161793,0.00026493112,0.6703577,0.006339698,0.045670915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014721568,0.00012502739,0.04328414,0.0018317262,0.00003890531,0.0009565394,0.50289536,0.00039844998,0.0002522833,0.07959614,0.37056094,0.00004572045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09735296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15138784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09735296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047748415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039866148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19357258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387895350","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001016","title":"International Rewards for Gender Equality Reforms in Autocracies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Genève; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; York University; University College London; Uppsala Universitet; University of Cambridge; University of Cyprus","keywords":"Autocracy; Democracy; Competition (biology); Elite; Incentive; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Democracy promotion; Promotion (chess); Economics; Market economy; Democratization; Law","score_opus":0.13647359800736952,"score_gpt":0.4935937450802623,"score_spread":0.3571201470728928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387895350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6301241,0.018912539,0.0014755235,0.022276536,0.00079565245,0.00007162849,0.00013929154,0.00004807731,0.32615677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988734,0.0033760257,0.00022972356,0.001234622,0.00016603273,0.000015479605,0.000030151226,0.000008257095,0.0062056636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688977,0.0019265441,0.000054379914,0.00014931212,0.00046589546,0.00051413913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99500847,0.0020507285,0.0015320844,0.0002737483,0.00045224474,0.0006826378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005047059,0.00011230894,0.0002424759,0.0008156481,0.0010395458,0.0025558418,0.0003021032,0.0006139287,0.008997964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008705877,0.00010606788,0.00018840919,0.0008724224,0.0016221151,0.0011008877,0.0018479201,0.0009606123,0.00043938446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046910509,0.0005013601,0.0907883,0.0014057525,0.0001327999,0.0004188707,0.029192125,0.00083564164,0.0027567064,0.2527039,0.028954193,0.5918412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010827611,0.00056663516,0.36111882,0.0016834404,0.00009552445,0.00041125243,0.037474412,0.00063787383,0.0021011413,0.034451928,0.561304,0.000046595895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00244529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006246534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008997964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016750746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014932852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03010124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388414526","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001119","title":"Publius’ Proleptic Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Constitution; Polity; Politics; Political science; Law; Federalism; Separation of powers; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0499977275707965,"score_gpt":0.4003813273920599,"score_spread":0.3503835998212634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388414526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012647173,0.005630484,0.01434051,0.04848624,0.0016274594,0.000057899055,0.00041508087,0.00020558029,0.9165896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65979606,0.008521653,0.012450379,0.028869966,0.0037754625,0.00056790834,0.0004772964,0.00023010196,0.28531113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976173,0.00067402667,0.000097060256,0.00045382962,0.0009267293,0.00023095479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998395,0.0008282641,0.000134607,0.00021038964,0.00037350453,0.000058166916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028280444,0.00029920673,0.00020433714,0.0016155472,0.0027502992,0.0047162515,0.00056803453,0.002415945,0.0047288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006996994,0.0002883207,0.0002771095,0.0010300261,0.009717076,0.0028627806,0.0017038283,0.005305641,0.0016112062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027369324,0.0000017033378,0.000027866225,0.000013626229,8.0922706e-7,0.0000142586905,0.000349306,0.00003920376,0.000024895575,0.9864326,0.0104268445,0.0026662939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122693245,0.000015660562,0.00049375475,0.000106473024,0.000007602955,0.00014593998,0.00023846631,0.00036209458,0.00038160014,0.38619632,0.61202884,0.000010923287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006079032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042226277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006079032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042799497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003990229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031053424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389199525","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001247","title":"“Filling the Ranks”: Moral Risk and the Ethics of Military Recruitment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Warwick; Newcastle University; British Academy; University of Cambridge; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Government of the United Kingdom; UK Research and Innovation; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.2296922934626063,"score_gpt":0.38797267339546576,"score_spread":0.15828037993285946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389199525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17128436,0.027468849,0.030081121,0.21742392,0.00086091843,0.00016425355,0.00002836741,0.000041266663,0.5526469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795632,0.0029110995,0.0024680065,0.009046733,0.00016481022,0.000087146655,0.0000053132685,0.000014027704,0.005739592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9221937,0.06615504,0.0010632919,0.0010848053,0.0072001074,0.0023030424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552836,0.03475201,0.003212745,0.0016472597,0.003827868,0.0012764094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035391092,0.00027737409,0.0004962833,0.0014120276,0.008540005,0.009237271,0.0009783296,0.0066467365,0.0024683576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047849838,0.00027269902,0.00034674746,0.0014029366,0.05077721,0.007708559,0.0051084487,0.0059461347,0.00035601854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020625404,0.00003729464,0.0013730183,0.00012633411,0.000009515953,0.000091085254,0.017362189,0.00038568457,0.00011790277,0.9541969,0.003939759,0.022339776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031371066,0.0001253361,0.00651671,0.002190065,0.000032283562,0.00025326,0.035530508,0.0013657123,0.0005886955,0.7927392,0.1605624,0.00006440572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008741801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012465046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035391092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008310566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013621527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18716824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389704445","doi":"10.1017/s000305542300117x","title":"My History or Our History? Historical Revisionism and Entitlement to Lead","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; National Research Foundation; Universitat de Barcelona; American Political Science Association; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Lead (geology); History; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Geology","score_opus":0.1271930131596795,"score_gpt":0.424765907335008,"score_spread":0.2975728941753285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389704445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79909897,0.0046661017,0.0028289652,0.023636483,0.00026810222,0.000012891722,0.000032873668,0.00001692148,0.16943875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976082,0.00054743286,0.00010604382,0.0003865434,0.00004131401,0.0000024332007,0.0000053889044,0.0000029245002,0.0012997545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801576,0.0014800822,0.000030375004,0.00008706789,0.0002174835,0.0001692975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960543,0.0021113872,0.0007090634,0.0003454607,0.00017947193,0.00060029945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002599277,0.00010026066,0.00013142596,0.00035752665,0.0014864214,0.0025736596,0.00030325228,0.00046796614,0.0047319406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007298786,0.00008999253,0.00009253384,0.0004402685,0.007947079,0.002749189,0.0015131112,0.0012555448,0.00029057445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000260441,0.00019625288,0.058023646,0.00030189625,0.000053969805,0.00041101215,0.19875106,0.00037500146,0.0023074588,0.58179855,0.009279043,0.14824164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076114244,0.00034537056,0.14359154,0.0008982937,0.000078424695,0.0010096725,0.2737096,0.0009530041,0.0012899821,0.21142913,0.36655754,0.00006130772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015144113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028353985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047319406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086797774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006303086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01582998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391910495","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001466","title":"Late Homesteading: Native Land Dispossession through Strategic Occupation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Threatened species; Political science; Geography; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03571724620452979,"score_gpt":0.33384892345194767,"score_spread":0.29813167724741785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391910495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6171337,0.03048499,0.0018455604,0.01592614,0.00012262753,0.000040178442,0.00016009805,0.000014088608,0.33427262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862678,0.007749518,0.00023670772,0.0009030429,0.000029060744,0.000008655444,0.00003810081,0.0000023765592,0.004764887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992662,0.0003195322,0.000026842095,0.00008086525,0.00013356426,0.00017310794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984837,0.0006785671,0.00046474178,0.000095623145,0.00017182349,0.000105560895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014045526,0.000079797785,0.00013755477,0.0007583144,0.0009820434,0.001536334,0.00027741905,0.0004895987,0.003682905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022143174,0.000057469086,0.00011725876,0.0011444597,0.0053251134,0.0022526411,0.0013570265,0.0008248142,0.00016072733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005398818,0.000101451864,0.070977144,0.0010874459,0.000049640712,0.0006349207,0.034483932,0.00049303984,0.0010462325,0.69737434,0.0114978505,0.18220006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023938384,0.00017010907,0.33588105,0.002299692,0.00006459236,0.00083757367,0.085327044,0.00047960127,0.0014880006,0.084092945,0.489296,0.000039452745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012629431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04821425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012629431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002248074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020742242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025111794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392560981","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001491","title":"Why Seeing Is Not Believing and Why Believing Is Seeing: On the Politics of Sight","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sight; Politics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.040724812187963665,"score_gpt":0.38004120838320876,"score_spread":0.3393163961952451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392560981","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039285343,0.3903314,0.0028900702,0.40158498,0.002230051,0.000016423523,0.000045476594,0.000019299481,0.16359703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74446726,0.20468651,0.0007527892,0.03859246,0.0019074659,0.0000279558,0.000043512682,0.00006209753,0.009459946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949663,0.0034236328,0.00010334611,0.0003427272,0.00073267013,0.000431377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899366,0.007966023,0.000787962,0.00020253951,0.0008162312,0.00029054531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005626532,0.00020207374,0.0004101236,0.0010014257,0.002251032,0.005390327,0.00087219593,0.00439873,0.0033738054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095076375,0.00023139235,0.0003121667,0.001256262,0.027683906,0.006395874,0.0020637745,0.006909058,0.00044624988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034383633,0.00002919994,0.0016833647,0.0004695803,0.000032004264,0.00021209146,0.026536794,0.00009781691,0.0001488313,0.88495904,0.026047895,0.059749044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003252853,0.000042623757,0.0113772815,0.0035417983,0.000051739586,0.000638027,0.04322386,0.00019954113,0.0003076588,0.38722432,0.5533196,0.000041059764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015473415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017362887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015473415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060080304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034851544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0435915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394923137","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000327","title":"Muddying the Waters: How Perceived Foreign Interference Affects Public Opinion on Protest Movements","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Interference (communication); Political science; Environmental science; Computer science; Telecommunications; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07774076246363833,"score_gpt":0.3950282917573228,"score_spread":0.3172875292936845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394923137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636117,0.004412053,0.0006246034,0.005513357,0.00010500062,0.00003437377,0.00025327373,0.000010199196,0.025435446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973635,0.0013281625,0.00007989071,0.00049678865,0.00007644899,0.000015240678,0.00006665704,0.0000041691173,0.00056900014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970804,0.0019313353,0.00009144819,0.00019686593,0.0004748568,0.0002251818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97498465,0.015425752,0.006455738,0.0005613795,0.0019254802,0.0006469763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005215386,0.00018938558,0.00038282364,0.0008039162,0.0003613223,0.002344971,0.00034283721,0.0007996186,0.0036014942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026002029,0.00010461259,0.00038120468,0.0011461399,0.0011196983,0.0014464236,0.0006887672,0.0011395073,0.00051841734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013827465,0.0010875579,0.7841388,0.0011881518,0.0012626104,0.0003135158,0.0146656195,0.0009772211,0.0021947767,0.01203318,0.008541283,0.17221452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004499695,0.00033681412,0.97931343,0.00031435362,0.00035714477,0.00005897485,0.00809068,0.0010940507,0.0005485761,0.0031179697,0.0066894433,0.000033630393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004697061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052869804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005215386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094915926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005471081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02758193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396863959","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000388","title":"What Is Colonialism? The Dual Claims of a Twentieth-Century Political Category","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Politics; Dual (grammatical number); History; Political science; Art; Literature; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.036457158379839406,"score_gpt":0.38502613235116656,"score_spread":0.34856897397132713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396863959","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070166826,0.45114323,0.0022157347,0.24887256,0.0024833125,0.000011895184,0.000032468542,0.000013781558,0.22506021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81878525,0.15638772,0.00063247554,0.011009161,0.0034815394,0.000019642184,0.000021309763,0.000019259936,0.009643667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807477,0.0010549579,0.000058002042,0.0001740927,0.00033282544,0.0003054781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742883,0.0015963669,0.00028747416,0.00016183907,0.0003100512,0.0002153805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028661322,0.00018936482,0.00038161318,0.0015351101,0.0027931426,0.0060223085,0.0004512115,0.0011566217,0.00096422003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039424696,0.00015091209,0.00019536914,0.0016980739,0.025427265,0.006082807,0.0018353516,0.0032363262,0.00011878683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009362282,0.000008184781,0.0010307455,0.00015979828,0.000011908559,0.00009279433,0.017231926,0.00009168273,0.00012428545,0.942428,0.0054436647,0.033367675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001024664,0.000027962966,0.009049808,0.0014347635,0.000015809113,0.00036677645,0.019013628,0.00019786484,0.00013461887,0.35713428,0.61259156,0.000022622973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01659657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016415946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01659657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048911814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032791656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03548819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401340787","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000716","title":"Improving Probabilistic Models In Text Classification Via Active Learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Active learning (machine learning)","score_opus":0.038489093231234166,"score_gpt":0.328479701192705,"score_spread":0.2899906079614708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401340787","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005632955,0.0012926232,0.9903882,0.00083497516,0.00012021892,0.00006312302,0.00008591839,0.0007452183,0.00083680346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34557372,0.0028652532,0.64252895,0.0012399651,0.0015280038,0.00082523306,0.0012062154,0.00043788215,0.0037947507],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936249,0.0035131574,0.0003229778,0.0011310875,0.0011695373,0.00023824706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95944566,0.03439226,0.0014941987,0.0019901616,0.0023771124,0.00030050616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012418901,0.0019524493,0.00231292,0.0041241255,0.0012930866,0.0040020454,0.0048407833,0.0036730901,0.0021139304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03643945,0.0012557738,0.0023337468,0.0040240544,0.0022688124,0.00986562,0.0028953888,0.0058446443,0.0017314226],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024476863,0.00044231338,0.0034293411,0.0005089668,0.00032285342,0.000106604944,0.00048397586,0.5134125,0.0024642688,0.052636977,0.0097843185,0.41616324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001703552,0.000016536622,0.000106009895,0.000019238016,0.00001688207,0.000012936059,0.000010887313,0.9717733,0.0005122487,0.026723273,0.0007810074,0.000010482026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030234724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033390454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012418901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016996702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012875078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06567818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401341819","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000534","title":"Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Latin Americans; Colonialism; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Sociology; American political science; Field (mathematics); Transnationalism; Political science; Epistemology; Political economy; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059266310002994885,"score_gpt":0.41326213247941357,"score_spread":0.3539958224764187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401341819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3132541,0.20744322,0.0050165197,0.104198426,0.000987219,0.000025466648,0.000041188177,0.00004263535,0.36899132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817523,0.013626003,0.00040929046,0.0015223615,0.0002947323,0.000019889052,0.000011158034,0.000012947806,0.002351305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942325,0.0045068827,0.00010429197,0.00035539133,0.0004885967,0.0003123457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482393,0.0033144904,0.00082287827,0.00031287354,0.00042106298,0.0003047248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066937865,0.00012923712,0.00037573022,0.0027805176,0.0033470257,0.008261407,0.00063396257,0.0013047173,0.0030821299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047469833,0.0001506102,0.00017127978,0.004004905,0.03088473,0.0046724994,0.0038709827,0.0021250865,0.0001571513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021645588,0.000028008933,0.0034484055,0.00019551214,0.000014907556,0.00011166357,0.092120215,0.00010464463,0.00011572328,0.884215,0.0018379836,0.017786304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052325373,0.000048396847,0.01778378,0.0031929037,0.000023643039,0.00035558033,0.17049916,0.00036908235,0.00015723045,0.4676834,0.33980715,0.000027329826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006959491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008078864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008261407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006428246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005564922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046640396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402651212","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000662","title":"Han Feizi on Reputation-Driven Disobedience: A Comparative Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Singapore Management University; Nanyang Technological University; York University; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Reputation; Civil disobedience; Comparative research; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.09431456782558417,"score_gpt":0.5039281714267211,"score_spread":0.4096136036011369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402651212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591401,0.0032529966,0.00026513534,0.0016581139,0.00004401828,0.000013137654,0.000013779203,0.0000010409905,0.035611726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976503,0.0008625223,0.000041580828,0.00014770096,0.0000197339,0.000004515896,0.0000049117716,9.950712e-7,0.0012676498],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895763,0.0006070325,0.000023598643,0.000090015164,0.0001662856,0.00015553522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969541,0.0022098296,0.00030290722,0.00013696082,0.00029035058,0.000105805346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038903244,0.00010557021,0.00035128923,0.00091733574,0.0021661608,0.0014597463,0.00028719503,0.00065039645,0.00473576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004391092,0.00008726077,0.00010762241,0.0013629574,0.004570511,0.0024339582,0.0009519513,0.00083315535,0.00017098834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072729803,0.0004976025,0.071774945,0.00085099356,0.000111565394,0.001876144,0.5503414,0.0001928682,0.0018359404,0.2416663,0.008689592,0.12143524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005908147,0.0006078744,0.37606043,0.00072900805,0.00013065664,0.0010422083,0.519212,0.00075764686,0.0014661353,0.018741522,0.081126615,0.000066878776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008142139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013869934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008142139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023957482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000934621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020574212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403264585","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001059","title":"Climate Displacement and Territorial Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; McGill University","keywords":"Climate justice; Economic Justice; Displacement (psychology); Political science; Criminology; Climate change; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.08262932801357967,"score_gpt":0.42367881439149363,"score_spread":0.341049486377914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403264585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06279271,0.08343471,0.041333076,0.09803593,0.0017250266,0.00010305165,0.00018610481,0.00006735495,0.71232194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629316,0.015102719,0.0015376091,0.0062551224,0.0005563792,0.00006435928,0.00006747265,0.000022504968,0.013462305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790406,0.000849132,0.000083046674,0.0002884165,0.0003772934,0.0004980002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911517,0.00032983956,0.00016491498,0.00012866507,0.00015897349,0.00010237021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017420091,0.00028637698,0.00045726626,0.0011927129,0.0036001564,0.003204938,0.0010241625,0.0031587682,0.006617374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028104768,0.00013918357,0.0006548823,0.0012911083,0.017910482,0.0048938277,0.006718186,0.002934487,0.00044297875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049760615,0.000008119359,0.0008420116,0.00009727834,0.000012843699,0.000054634023,0.0015326737,0.00080377224,0.000056395016,0.9853371,0.0021715206,0.009078661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008562896,0.00003833304,0.006724647,0.0005611734,0.000024245868,0.00029667094,0.008024456,0.00077352684,0.00014139018,0.7064277,0.2769494,0.000029858102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01428717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015507207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01428717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032030572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030030478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02840805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404043574","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001060","title":"Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Wageningen University and Research; Universität Konstanz; Universiteit Antwerpen; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Universidade de Lisboa; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Tel Aviv University; Université de Lausanne; Vetenskapsrådet; Vlaamse regering; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Université de Genève; Göteborgs Universitet; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Univerzita Karlova v Praze; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Universität Basel; Universitetet i Bergen; University of Southern California","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Voting behavior; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.043317685865533896,"score_gpt":0.4429813996768992,"score_spread":0.3996637138113653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404043574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6329573,0.004553775,0.05240444,0.013359128,0.00014445046,0.00012114862,0.0007468431,0.00009475678,0.29561824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943634,0.0013295973,0.0016427896,0.00027188487,0.00008522973,0.000039744515,0.00027755633,0.0000096483245,0.0019801185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548894,0.0025558881,0.00020998802,0.0005056429,0.0008251098,0.00041446197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872908,0.008476446,0.0018494865,0.0011122205,0.0009409179,0.0003301213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007629372,0.00030503032,0.00055420963,0.0032649203,0.0010897751,0.0026656522,0.0009977572,0.0008483378,0.0077699525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017132755,0.00025273408,0.0005664326,0.003296094,0.0033026373,0.0026744427,0.0010902092,0.0014628905,0.0011916663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010726746,0.00013592531,0.13701834,0.00029902896,0.00014307356,0.000055619435,0.0053463397,0.0062961164,0.00032406152,0.77904165,0.0037612163,0.0674713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007645644,0.00017201749,0.25327465,0.0003480384,0.00015516051,0.0002152843,0.0083424775,0.028999612,0.0006685215,0.6483295,0.059356663,0.00006165211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022386399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026493855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077699525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015751431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009600994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04034847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404245593","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001072","title":"Structural Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07569748917997438,"score_gpt":0.4579720543177422,"score_spread":0.3822745651377678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404245593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066819196,0.003393967,0.06954793,0.078688525,0.0013007887,0.00013494675,0.00013815772,0.00016364476,0.83995014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77400744,0.0061192648,0.016087601,0.031172207,0.0021403336,0.0004973049,0.0003084478,0.0002545226,0.16941284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863067,0.004476024,0.00053795305,0.0022443747,0.0050588455,0.001376078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886546,0.003485544,0.0013357251,0.0026601637,0.0026507,0.0012132549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009690069,0.0006286615,0.0004975522,0.0016138024,0.003483467,0.0068487446,0.0024620243,0.0056024683,0.020316701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019553984,0.00036228757,0.00087811606,0.001043893,0.019227814,0.009441501,0.008925195,0.0058762087,0.0033792453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001749538,0.0000060814277,0.0001295222,0.000022710217,0.000003372995,0.000016554668,0.00057259307,0.000118550604,0.00003329306,0.9911116,0.0039914697,0.0039925356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007051689,0.000014653037,0.00039294295,0.00018167755,0.000008455235,0.00017127093,0.00070879224,0.00033086367,0.00020565883,0.7491071,0.24885948,0.000012050801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004673783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003794061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020316701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005773887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010436544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0679661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404592370","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001102","title":"The Global Network of Liberty: Toward a New Framework for Understanding the History of Political Concepts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.09847930858409717,"score_gpt":0.4387913795112111,"score_spread":0.3403120709271139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404592370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07828758,0.019911941,0.28978828,0.05408431,0.0008868738,0.00015347241,0.0004448845,0.00020301256,0.55623966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382304,0.008055534,0.04395378,0.0010822894,0.0005087119,0.00025214523,0.0002597342,0.00016393843,0.0074935476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822706,0.0011685344,0.000044990862,0.00026880763,0.00015696391,0.0001336323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590117,0.0027652339,0.00037341533,0.00042377488,0.00024995863,0.00028659377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003956204,0.00064687093,0.0006532796,0.007932566,0.0037615662,0.01174666,0.0013991132,0.0019138166,0.0066246996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055354484,0.00030891065,0.0004628351,0.006633209,0.028459208,0.022705581,0.0045952876,0.0035462724,0.00049145217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024961014,0.0000018086675,0.00028092996,0.00001706451,0.000002266095,0.000016537786,0.0045774523,0.00022633304,0.000018427378,0.99118453,0.00038054615,0.0032916744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032573441,0.0000054492116,0.0008993649,0.0001172635,0.0000048942284,0.000066929264,0.0073879543,0.001289797,0.00003872778,0.9301537,0.060025766,0.0000069696475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005054583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044294964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01174666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005489121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028267107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039826572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405116271","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001205","title":"Gendered Perceptions and the Costs of Political Toxicity: Experimental Evidence from Politicians and Citizens in Four Democracies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Göteborgs Universitet; Queen's University; Universitetet i Oslo; Queen's University Belfast; King's College London","keywords":"Hostility; Politics; Prejudice (legal term); Perception; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.060368031857341936,"score_gpt":0.4100688946110223,"score_spread":0.3497008627536804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405116271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972268,0.00007247281,0.00009037597,0.00008234502,0.0000046312293,0.000010478624,0.0000058299634,8.753226e-7,0.00250618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923074,0.00010859773,0.000110246896,0.00006750244,0.0000061383375,0.000010202196,0.0000092243645,0.0000016202584,0.0004556015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966241,0.002283987,0.00010765833,0.00023323517,0.0005345944,0.00021645715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98711115,0.0077539473,0.0033719197,0.0008052728,0.0003644458,0.00059326604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005693679,0.00029339103,0.00039130752,0.00046326086,0.0011896096,0.0019304153,0.00031722712,0.00091150054,0.004108659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01215256,0.00027580978,0.00025070587,0.00034902492,0.0031052583,0.0007451273,0.0010809544,0.0011653617,0.00026157312],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01760511,0.03644387,0.61121035,0.0008893044,0.00093724846,0.0009158396,0.09790683,0.001550646,0.05824233,0.027025359,0.0021946377,0.14507861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007000157,0.009656278,0.90995604,0.00014397515,0.0003537537,0.0004345071,0.05065421,0.0018429683,0.010626892,0.008818859,0.0067136553,0.00009887995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019564563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002950891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005693679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064331334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039460778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030111372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407582282","doi":"10.1017/s000305542500005x","title":"What Is the Wrong of Capitalism?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; American University in Cairo; Yale University; Uppsala Universitet; University of Cambridge; Princeton University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Capitalism; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Economic system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04465522094723426,"score_gpt":0.4267242512993052,"score_spread":0.38206903035207096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407582282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009653177,0.06553877,0.0038396716,0.8092994,0.0033199354,0.000011911793,0.000086458844,0.000045315992,0.10820526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7411034,0.07719054,0.0027795138,0.14391245,0.013470319,0.00007888966,0.00011121968,0.00013523879,0.021218382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940612,0.002906143,0.00013187945,0.00059217366,0.0013863876,0.000922316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914842,0.005213286,0.0005559301,0.0007209139,0.001298498,0.0007271317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00805137,0.00042238447,0.0007889002,0.0020312278,0.005656818,0.012316954,0.0013640053,0.0048603225,0.0042742756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012534287,0.0002465373,0.00046870924,0.002044884,0.034877315,0.015484088,0.003165505,0.006891759,0.00085585215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018067782,0.000017491964,0.00057183526,0.00010412125,0.000014480702,0.00004971785,0.0016079316,0.00014350204,0.00004126195,0.9430061,0.031711232,0.022714315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011199236,0.000012388671,0.00074787816,0.0003646517,0.0000075928433,0.000060818016,0.0017025793,0.00020569938,0.00007714918,0.84961945,0.14717647,0.000014236379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013652315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008876929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013652315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00793198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007339706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057550788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410970754","doi":"10.1017/s0003055425000218","title":"Unconditional Loyalty: The Survival of Minority Autocracies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autocracy; Loyalty; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025364861750917112,"score_gpt":0.40382832763626253,"score_spread":0.3784634658853454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410970754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679249,0.00063879194,0.00048799912,0.0016864389,0.000024067185,0.000011165798,0.000025532556,0.0000052828927,0.029195791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909496,0.000101012585,0.00004461109,0.000065261804,0.0000070697365,0.0000021889787,0.00000631684,0.0000010776828,0.0006774825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858105,0.0006901039,0.000034987388,0.00013926522,0.00014882075,0.00040577358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975625,0.00084748736,0.0007387793,0.00024177424,0.00021278913,0.0003966971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023370706,0.00008270306,0.00020527371,0.0006245301,0.0032341378,0.0034113878,0.0005682887,0.0005405559,0.0025146252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052278745,0.00007298771,0.000075954216,0.00063773105,0.0031688125,0.0018681323,0.0024617293,0.0008074321,0.00012786887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025118663,0.00028288818,0.24864459,0.00032011623,0.000084048406,0.0016404525,0.3024246,0.00042988258,0.0019494069,0.21369612,0.0061671305,0.22410947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028971244,0.00026231122,0.38301826,0.00052669866,0.00006821706,0.0010005836,0.47610343,0.0016562336,0.0011022356,0.03733681,0.098849505,0.000046687324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008073271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018785788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008073271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017856244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016762792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016052544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415299814","doi":"10.1017/s000305542510124x","title":"Institutional Forbearance as a Mechanism of Democratic Stability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Forbearance; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Mechanism (biology); Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.02900159916371926,"score_gpt":0.3782161330085528,"score_spread":0.34921453384483353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415299814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1492772,0.01668316,0.21999368,0.044908058,0.0008079099,0.0003328679,0.00012950663,0.0005334411,0.5673342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98619986,0.0012625745,0.0067131934,0.001585578,0.00019921457,0.00012646546,0.000023570983,0.00003624512,0.0038532906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98563206,0.0061399676,0.00083150563,0.0026867222,0.0033036107,0.0014061275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98147446,0.0076661124,0.0049031074,0.0037168886,0.0014591478,0.00078024575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014734732,0.00043514188,0.0005956991,0.0025253848,0.0030318894,0.008046791,0.0019481889,0.004509283,0.004335794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01866778,0.00058574876,0.0008493306,0.0013395299,0.044375528,0.009905197,0.007698688,0.0062004696,0.00056399027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007847893,0.000010330166,0.0004337424,0.000067685694,0.000011168637,0.000033578122,0.0010525476,0.00035724725,0.00028208806,0.99266654,0.00033734358,0.0047398834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003661206,0.000053728807,0.0019398391,0.00023071138,0.000024229807,0.00020149408,0.0007704367,0.0010434098,0.00092199486,0.95837164,0.03637432,0.000031580144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010566264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089536904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014734732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044689784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004153586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07792562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415907474","doi":"10.1017/s0003055425101263","title":"How Firms, Bureaucrats, and Ministries Benefit from the Revolving Door: Evidence from Japan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; University of Tokyo; University of Toronto; Yale University; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Copenhagen Business School; American Political Science Association; Center for Global Partnership","keywords":"Revolving door; Bureaucracy; Cognitive reframing; Civil servants; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Elite","score_opus":0.03321595315554937,"score_gpt":0.29967625486341976,"score_spread":0.2664603017078704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415907474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98768383,0.0029011245,0.000059617312,0.0006847053,0.000010542307,0.000008217085,0.00006556403,0.000002435809,0.008583948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771655,0.0013394441,0.000026678166,0.0001682331,0.000017092256,0.0000032640341,0.000070361915,0.0000024973956,0.00065578485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985581,0.00039560773,0.00009823644,0.00017325059,0.00026997522,0.00050488254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897048,0.002064788,0.0047176937,0.00035491932,0.0008958225,0.002261959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020111601,0.00014469796,0.00034555237,0.001502895,0.0014790848,0.0026369258,0.0004498256,0.00060972787,0.0039748363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007280143,0.00024598435,0.00030117863,0.002159769,0.0014986543,0.0014164168,0.0019139315,0.00058054476,0.00045622414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002781233,0.00017027055,0.9659682,0.00020926345,0.00008507923,0.00030680632,0.006133994,0.00006445426,0.00027383174,0.0018980621,0.0013964535,0.023215545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019176507,0.00005235693,0.9901209,0.00006147993,0.000048210284,0.00005371377,0.0061531398,0.000053959706,0.00006733998,0.00020521824,0.0031573884,0.0000072243774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03117754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07494015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03117754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010940878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013436774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06199217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416727698","doi":"10.1017/s0003055425101299","title":"Attitudinal and Behavioral Legacies of Wartime Violence: A Meta-Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Hostility; Cohesion (chemistry); Psychological intervention; Politics; Identification (biology); Spanish Civil War","score_opus":0.10414079017648785,"score_gpt":0.5045191794016735,"score_spread":0.4003783892251856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416727698","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021114483,0.9753235,0.0012461299,0.0005008488,0.00016344672,0.00018266153,0.00092017726,0.00003231734,0.00051643135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49673873,0.49450266,0.0040774303,0.0011778813,0.00026847728,0.0010487888,0.0016850838,0.000057835587,0.0004430479],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841344,0.009293519,0.0033218,0.0016742451,0.0012458591,0.00033009495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521008,0.038717903,0.005070432,0.0015351097,0.0021967967,0.00037891924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023282282,0.0019008613,0.0074804886,0.0041799527,0.00065528025,0.0031006462,0.001892089,0.0016583414,0.002693726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05025914,0.0010792516,0.024932722,0.0064199157,0.000788332,0.001608915,0.0014691806,0.0018160865,0.00024036334],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013965335,0.000041684198,0.030677324,0.11722399,0.8305879,0.00013162658,0.00021651325,0.0004446467,0.00023551806,0.0002665618,0.0010132102,0.017764462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031900196,0.00021003182,0.021998622,0.016458755,0.9578324,0.00013024652,0.00012262176,0.00019617319,0.00018086303,0.00035774513,0.002168972,0.000024654473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059339153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011372206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023282282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017643347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024203588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123129904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}