{"meta":{"query_hash":"482b7aabdd5d","filters":{"venue":"American Political Science Review"},"cohort_total":143,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":143,"exported":143,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/482b7aabdd5d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+Political+Science+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1968639397","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406062472","title":"The Influence of European Émigré Scholars on Comparative Politics, 1925–1965","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Americanization; Politics; Émigré; Comparative politics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Comparative research; Social science; Economic history; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.04405632931130666,"score_gpt":0.4365385975486604,"score_spread":0.39248226823735377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968639397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.502993,0.0016718152,0.000015881626,0.036815755,0.000118420714,0.00059064117,0.000015674535,0.000058854857,0.45771995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398166,0.0023521686,0.00012314467,0.0028312332,0.00024289885,0.000016103642,0.0000011663859,0.0000058483793,0.000445751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930345,0.000971711,0.00049866294,0.00042054337,0.0018141442,0.003260472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591875,0.0011795141,0.0001856422,0.0004786413,0.0004708162,0.001766612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008292179,0.00015421666,0.00033493747,0.00009808192,0.0017763395,0.00022164614,0.0015397615,0.00001867138,0.00004808379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008284623,0.000099578174,0.0001130846,0.002476607,0.021908497,0.00046104693,0.0001312905,0.00028101003,0.00032830526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001348268,0.00006849727,0.0013121349,0.000024857782,0.0000018330015,0.0000010099153,0.000101991835,0.000002193126,0.0000780868,0.99155015,0.00059228076,0.0062656254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106166815,0.00034723,0.47593245,0.0010466194,0.00002758493,0.000004171397,0.0023728185,0.0000154122,0.00044795033,0.04059453,0.47869077,0.00041429803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032125726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039351004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069286535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002167997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973580860","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402390361","title":"Liberalism Beyond Justice: Citizens, Society, and the Boundaries of Political Theory By John Tomasi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 163p. $55.00 cloth, $15.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Economic Justice; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Neglect; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.027732150176438493,"score_gpt":0.313853610090718,"score_spread":0.2861214599142795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973580860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035532364,0.053874563,0.00016705894,0.3130806,0.0003682693,0.001338543,0.0002449319,0.00019961971,0.6271732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8289767,0.12019502,0.0008202971,0.046705075,0.0005495978,0.000017741591,0.000004615233,0.000028418968,0.0027025389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993381,0.0013096565,0.0005775496,0.0006969299,0.0014408609,0.0025939508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948219,0.0023214447,0.00024131814,0.0005981716,0.00032834586,0.0016887984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044363122,0.00032546953,0.000874387,0.000034348737,0.002291747,0.0002697939,0.0012742126,0.00015186518,0.00041026558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041183433,0.00023905357,0.00031402684,0.0011369161,0.08527186,0.0006609254,0.00046570096,0.0006759924,0.000033282904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015215999,0.00008801201,0.000045374632,0.00040555006,0.000023206938,0.0000042780607,0.00075984694,4.057246e-8,0.000008363874,0.9807192,0.016149862,0.001781048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047024395,0.00009332142,0.00028584612,0.00049347634,0.00034098266,0.000014519372,0.0022966769,0.000046217327,0.00004012999,0.2581255,0.7373679,0.00042513077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006872844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038773633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005075941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010185565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977629785","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402630242","title":"Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation. Edited by Arun Agrawal and Clark C. Gibson. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2001. 232p. $60.00 cloth, $23.00 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Dilemma; Natural resource; Common-pool resource; State (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Law; Philosophy; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027611413029160658,"score_gpt":0.2280081469259155,"score_spread":0.20039673389675486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977629785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72793496,0.06636962,0.0006444123,0.1612788,0.00009570777,0.003940077,0.00012547309,0.00012326552,0.039487667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7586193,0.198204,0.0003051606,0.042093396,0.000016202117,0.000008063949,0.000017582466,0.00001220441,0.0007240818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996954,0.0013828608,0.00027109584,0.00028507705,0.000492394,0.0006145325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980302,0.0009653222,0.00015666349,0.00048079883,0.000013447628,0.00035360522],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021682316,0.00021077962,0.00036743068,0.00004223922,0.0012009463,0.00011644045,0.00069745386,0.000031609114,0.0002278582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013205632,0.00013822998,0.000053558964,0.0005566901,0.019580558,0.00027146275,0.0008761213,0.00040247306,0.000013989597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004260512,0.0011713558,0.7568766,0.001617731,0.00020397687,0.00003798053,0.021492815,0.00021888239,0.00021938639,0.024472233,0.14252523,0.050737765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054192776,0.00020652376,0.39182553,0.00043706008,0.00027440034,0.000016714353,0.006731437,0.008066878,0.000023092152,0.0019791527,0.5842107,0.0008092383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19699065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009430995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44168547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020311266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004857361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977854395","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402240460","title":"Natural Law Modernized. By David Braybrooke. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001. 351p. $70.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Postmodernism; Utilitarianism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02961032787433917,"score_gpt":0.3285258358194835,"score_spread":0.2989155079451444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977854395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00324445,0.45450738,0.00002555054,0.021103946,0.00030032554,0.0010726459,0.0000694051,0.00018740103,0.5194889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7052181,0.28782508,0.00071656605,0.002333199,0.00010958482,0.0000054874786,0.0000026299326,0.000009799895,0.00377959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612963,0.00032103012,0.0003246879,0.00053692097,0.0011509865,0.0015367441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813443,0.00022658244,0.000211129,0.00033681036,0.00023654616,0.00085450785],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008210313,0.0002243098,0.00064673246,0.0000034665231,0.0010714037,0.00006139428,0.0011121649,0.00004899717,0.002045429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078693253,0.00018388723,0.00019729539,0.00024687606,0.009475546,0.0011979757,0.00025484417,0.00015308472,0.00006828888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013896389,0.00044606024,0.00043510672,0.00046296685,0.00008847161,0.000010495527,0.008173279,5.362007e-7,0.00063351064,0.69700634,0.19571304,0.097016305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014593794,0.000074206146,0.0007080446,0.00031660023,0.000070395516,0.0000014539944,0.003150694,0.00009518207,0.000038861723,0.00014629833,0.9948968,0.00035551903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73992735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062554285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7991838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019801455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112190464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980971524","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402680360","title":"Commissioned Ridings: Designing Canada's Electoral Districts. By John C. Courtney. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2001. 337p. $75.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Parliament; Democracy; Proportional representation; Politics; Political science; Turnout; Institution; Representation (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Voting","score_opus":0.017902668694837507,"score_gpt":0.2714401018837653,"score_spread":0.25353743318892774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980971524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037077826,0.039140068,0.00038679593,0.16524513,0.0009350515,0.0030149668,0.0019195282,0.00063335703,0.7850173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92014915,0.062394172,0.00025751287,0.010304791,0.00021179732,0.000013175614,0.0000075299863,0.000030016752,0.006631838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99376744,0.0005864863,0.00048219884,0.0007061976,0.0016483676,0.0028093113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956273,0.0005629082,0.00032555131,0.00043548117,0.00024663282,0.002802133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011368146,0.00031159137,0.0007474289,0.000028320403,0.0015112493,0.00010975331,0.0012052953,0.00006894097,0.0003857518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025114024,0.00027289218,0.00014405038,0.0016514178,0.0033271397,0.00053483155,0.00015713784,0.00031492618,0.00003694657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041633934,0.000110731315,0.00076137576,0.00013103818,0.000014401227,0.00004486218,0.000035822366,4.7735665e-7,0.000053675172,0.37648508,0.6170042,0.005354173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014673742,0.00006375679,0.0014231346,0.00058822014,0.000045964836,0.0000046933724,0.00017794686,0.000067054454,0.000045127264,0.00014595117,0.9968912,0.0004002319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029021723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011553736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984245235","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402310244","title":"Rebel Writer: Mary Wollstonecraft and Enlightenment Politics. By Wendy Gunther-Canada. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2001. 224p. $38.00","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Politics; Conversation; Feminism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Literature; Religious studies; Sociology; Art; Gender studies; Theology; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020280461987598305,"score_gpt":0.2196937369858801,"score_spread":0.1994132749982818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984245235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10475229,0.15597181,0.00004386389,0.070601314,0.00067180255,0.0016486159,0.0007321393,0.00021307793,0.6653651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6607417,0.27809945,0.0002923651,0.02106599,0.0004495881,0.00002604801,0.000025314472,0.000059064037,0.039240498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964536,0.00013141768,0.00041796628,0.0006519927,0.00085279817,0.0014922451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979968,0.00010337505,0.0001640711,0.0005243703,0.00014191304,0.001069477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003525698,0.00032322132,0.0005389679,0.0000621731,0.00072989636,0.0001374826,0.0006019049,0.000028945526,0.0015796341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066756416,0.00025972706,0.000106388776,0.00020103571,0.0033053022,0.00027559404,0.00018746553,0.00018164913,0.0000682186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006284984,0.00035311855,0.00077741564,0.00056179566,0.00007270769,0.000072375115,0.0041472604,3.910096e-7,0.00003341549,0.36177817,0.6150392,0.017157858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013526554,0.00010647814,0.00020973958,0.00025957497,0.00006162488,0.00002115452,0.0046835146,0.000067777735,0.000022621234,0.00024287806,0.99380827,0.00038109554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22223255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004117701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6261246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008098592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028185605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991275501","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402294319","title":"Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. By Bent Flyvbjerg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 201p. $54.95 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Quarter (Canadian coin); Norm (philosophy); Bent molecular geometry; Politics; Similarity (geometry); Political science; Sociology; Social science; History; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1700335627941907,"score_gpt":0.44300536854702993,"score_spread":0.2729718057528392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991275501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12421353,0.023066433,0.0012854486,0.7083585,0.0014333002,0.0030945973,0.00054441026,0.0002920649,0.13771172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93971044,0.015086114,0.0002907466,0.04283234,0.0002940981,0.000017657578,0.0000067742926,0.00001878517,0.0017430175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904892,0.00061904243,0.0007300148,0.0014701982,0.004464507,0.002227038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625295,0.0004811933,0.0006179125,0.00065307785,0.0007797171,0.0012151691],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073719113,0.00040535477,0.000894771,0.00022713923,0.0024053187,0.0014040048,0.0022883096,0.000070822294,0.00078926847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018444685,0.0003313205,0.00020366343,0.0042532454,0.011908876,0.0029439668,0.0007713979,0.00037911485,0.00020746284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064241603,0.00009719628,0.0025177998,0.00010428546,0.000009621011,0.000009266061,0.0003675847,4.969544e-7,0.00044541416,0.044460155,0.9085165,0.04346522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044016563,0.00016465805,0.041866444,0.0002972649,0.000095017196,0.000041546173,0.0047895163,0.0015570441,0.00007220287,0.00006839163,0.9497967,0.00081109104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019672874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005030923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8154969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010886218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010542644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996146536","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402474333","title":"Unemployment and Government: Genealogies of the Social By William Walters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 240p. $64.95 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Unemployment; Governmentality; Politics; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Corporate governance; Generalization; Positive economics; Political economy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Management; Economic growth; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027786679304642806,"score_gpt":0.3085491523664461,"score_spread":0.2807624730618033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996146536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09898311,0.21303044,0.000021506406,0.32831573,0.0008751009,0.0032753032,0.0011286885,0.00028820278,0.3540819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6228543,0.36645424,0.000032885575,0.007874667,0.00025403636,0.000010346721,7.9831307e-7,0.000010917515,0.0025078095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665445,0.00034047657,0.0002963937,0.0003849714,0.0012102186,0.0011134886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988342,0.00018364911,0.0002429797,0.00022899118,0.0000850846,0.00042508057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007892967,0.00018920931,0.00047697825,0.000011354371,0.001988819,0.00004811614,0.00078246073,0.000048068763,0.000015129158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007107962,0.00012839127,0.00016166717,0.0010052463,0.013230814,0.00027623045,0.00039036453,0.00016213833,0.000006482834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059057397,0.00015631541,0.003058116,0.00032384196,0.000053519332,0.0000034542788,0.0020289344,1.4138658e-7,0.000083639694,0.7367289,0.22872669,0.028830506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021349454,0.00009787903,0.013830067,0.00028528826,0.0001486345,0.000002754368,0.007218883,0.000009547273,0.000087558874,0.00016359653,0.9775595,0.0003827628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02890229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012983743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7488328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007252708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025152403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015168179","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402214318","title":"The Future of Teledemocracy. By Ted Becker and Christa Daryl Slaton. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000. 248p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Futurist; Manifesto; Ideology; Democracy; Politics; Art history; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Religious studies; Law; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.014317816149892255,"score_gpt":0.32009425345085135,"score_spread":0.3057764373009591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015168179","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050908662,0.69276226,0.000006163887,0.19339857,0.001270955,0.0015326553,0.00011994564,0.00017002894,0.05983076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5147896,0.47018236,0.00017140765,0.01281399,0.00086594647,0.000053268857,0.000003511543,0.000025073901,0.0010948683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953269,0.00040916857,0.00063306914,0.0004999501,0.0012714562,0.0018594866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966884,0.00097477116,0.00031952755,0.00048688552,0.00022540019,0.0013050111],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014613222,0.00025565966,0.0006426766,0.00004004612,0.0013351224,0.00013299214,0.00090839685,0.00005956237,0.0004616091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024186806,0.00017600655,0.00015254696,0.0019270992,0.0134971365,0.0003559028,0.00012775575,0.0003407845,0.0000697558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033571646,0.00017281891,0.010330792,0.00025999296,0.000027360822,0.000015266483,0.0017108289,1.443484e-8,0.0001139417,0.4965328,0.1601295,0.33070332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096096825,0.00008416381,0.0012154604,0.0002720342,0.00005963528,0.000014110152,0.0046558934,0.000007006579,0.000034345874,0.0023518167,0.9909487,0.00026078947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010809676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029441205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83081913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027205993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008669031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022935061","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402230361","title":"The Problems of Communitarian Politics: Unity and Conflict By Elizabeth Frazer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 279p. $70.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Politics; Sociology; Locality; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Liberalism; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030381592904924336,"score_gpt":0.28773730804064185,"score_spread":0.25735571513571753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022935061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016269734,0.11343148,0.0002241846,0.09679646,0.00033100817,0.002212854,0.00038402615,0.0002323281,0.77011794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5464153,0.44116914,0.00020169046,0.00929706,0.00010247685,0.000014886673,0.0000049839327,0.000017400036,0.002777015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568516,0.0008174599,0.0005095857,0.0004196213,0.00058404374,0.0019841408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962922,0.0011074692,0.00024057554,0.0006330791,0.00023082313,0.0014958644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022514751,0.00024049882,0.0006017979,0.00004115738,0.001970573,0.000107117055,0.0014004513,0.00008040717,0.00023230536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017688392,0.00018791479,0.00013134097,0.0009096018,0.02333585,0.00058298244,0.00035450398,0.00042710642,0.000011629708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016636262,0.00008510116,0.0003274542,0.00015642848,0.00001397713,0.0000011792497,0.0003995025,1.5216403e-7,0.0000064115898,0.98343,0.0046598767,0.010918254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014094601,0.00011519682,0.00035141982,0.0003630569,0.00005336576,0.0000036588847,0.002158818,0.00011409123,0.000014975701,0.003548244,0.9928854,0.00025079347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051624727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005255657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004439842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061474997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039350129","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000227","title":"Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Temple University; Yale University; Harvard University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Politics; Disadvantage; Gender gap; Socialization; Political science; Representation (politics); Gender studies; Sociology; Demographic economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05509635796580101,"score_gpt":0.3946754689008339,"score_spread":0.3395791109350329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039350129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42740837,0.0012644944,0.00086641463,0.15635018,0.0007953856,0.0015327042,0.000013516109,0.00006064561,0.4117083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99286854,0.0004654808,0.00008876413,0.006392975,0.00012841809,0.000014959268,3.298912e-7,0.000004629031,0.0000358724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699545,0.0004978957,0.00031727747,0.00024097525,0.0008476582,0.0011007413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877125,0.00030196295,0.0001090667,0.0003612369,0.000117572556,0.0003389253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024468086,0.00008862998,0.00022058,0.000047395442,0.00037799796,0.00004616916,0.0006477598,0.000021700918,0.00003828394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020277079,0.00004859002,0.00010575867,0.001409745,0.0054025818,0.00012955417,0.00011928619,0.0001536401,0.000018070163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.7492584e-7,0.000019513971,0.0045945155,0.000049379396,0.0000011962728,1.482465e-7,0.00022246284,0.000002124319,0.00003487514,0.9924078,0.000037326332,0.002630358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023395191,0.00008714216,0.33888322,0.00090876746,0.000088490284,0.000011696706,0.007366934,0.00023690778,0.0006666605,0.51754427,0.1335452,0.0004267675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03434708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004983125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5654602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057356263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000629126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042691157","doi":"10.1017/s000305540298024x","title":"After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. By G. John Ikenberry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 293p. $55.00 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Diplomacy; Politics; Peacemaking; Order (exchange); Political science; International relations; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Economics","score_opus":0.01999229398596373,"score_gpt":0.2914476496660939,"score_spread":0.27145535568013013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042691157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35642886,0.26545593,0.00018589945,0.086985126,0.00038126795,0.0036348805,0.00036426593,0.00026113767,0.2863026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8171248,0.17842907,0.00038147467,0.003597556,0.000056869318,0.000016431184,0.00000192644,0.000007727252,0.00038417196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654526,0.0005045108,0.00040333928,0.0005585752,0.00082716596,0.001161174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822223,0.00018019232,0.00020647749,0.0004467771,0.00021873199,0.00072559644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015805801,0.00022994954,0.0005211802,0.000047836573,0.00064862345,0.00012830642,0.00080884254,0.00007285038,0.00032541022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006956743,0.00016942948,0.00012554141,0.001549694,0.015144673,0.00065320387,0.0002352058,0.00029679213,0.000022252802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003207593,0.00011514563,0.001476107,0.00025351645,0.000017376935,0.000019180714,0.0007975677,0.0000011694019,0.0000122370675,0.99241877,0.002536665,0.0023201846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037657437,0.00006042317,0.0020016076,0.0006711733,0.000114084025,0.00001092743,0.0016157926,0.00014743247,0.0000025741301,0.0018540187,0.9927829,0.00036250663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018519657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011511423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99056476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005257362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008537314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045153896","doi":"10.2307/2585913","title":"International Management of the Environment: Pollution Control in North America. By Emmett N. Lombard. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999. 198p. $59.95.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Environmental Law and Policies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Control (management); Economic history; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.0037931415000963856,"score_gpt":0.23230547050677758,"score_spread":0.2285123290066812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045153896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5782497,0.00607529,0.00024728477,0.04170063,0.00033148692,0.002472834,0.00062939664,0.00006149379,0.3702319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716862,0.0150473155,0.00021845903,0.0114025315,0.000020391602,0.000062469226,0.000014849335,0.000011850349,0.0015359306],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691886,0.000108466855,0.00054102374,0.00047711734,0.0011791844,0.000775361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906105,0.00004139616,0.0002043802,0.0004233504,0.0000046528426,0.00026516107],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039286588,0.00021598984,0.0003240133,0.000032009993,0.00012866134,0.000021645712,0.0010768247,0.000013625953,0.005978336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026024478,0.00015704018,0.00014170186,0.0007262654,0.0041545653,0.00027698005,0.00026575872,0.00015884172,0.0008247891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000518829,0.0018403128,0.16530588,0.00026366883,0.00012970227,0.000051406467,0.0001464938,0.0021386587,0.0018217402,0.06372473,0.020464668,0.7440609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025174007,0.000064726075,0.20998743,0.00017670491,0.000040309198,0.000015984775,0.00003413387,0.00025485846,0.00013784676,0.00018347136,0.7886235,0.00022927145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005584541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041609117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76815885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075344247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020761367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048550557","doi":"10.2307/2586227","title":"Postmodernism Rightly Understood: The Return to Realism in American Thought. By Peter Augustine Lawler. Lanham, MD: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 1999. 193p. $60.00 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"University Challenges and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Montana","keywords":"Postmodernism; Realism; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023694821365896564,"score_gpt":0.33222960697509046,"score_spread":0.3085347856091939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048550557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0755503,0.026975224,0.00010125221,0.44536778,0.00030074318,0.0019992006,0.00011064,0.00032407205,0.44927078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67240036,0.25115648,0.0010119599,0.06806779,0.00056002045,0.00003975766,0.000021895174,0.000044372195,0.0066973944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491966,0.0004962332,0.000489862,0.00081574277,0.0011982984,0.002080202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719596,0.00034255578,0.00017140487,0.00074123824,0.00009919024,0.0014496301],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001823426,0.00032595085,0.00068850303,0.000092040464,0.00104163,0.00016637059,0.0016488391,0.00007758097,0.0012019488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038931367,0.00020220417,0.00021312459,0.0024160794,0.006406275,0.00044832256,0.00020323734,0.000505655,0.0003264003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069604735,0.00060346525,0.00088503765,0.000308968,0.000063235086,0.000103488004,0.014745767,0.0000067542496,0.0001905729,0.45443636,0.1742695,0.35431725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012153589,0.00017256902,0.0011179289,0.00036142662,0.000031407733,0.000015235215,0.0028177437,0.000006710408,0.0000056046174,0.0020259605,0.9929539,0.00037000375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18110362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023575624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072747114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005636082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059528998","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401552028","title":"Building Democracy in South Asia: India, Nepal, Pakistan. By Maya Chadda. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000. 247p. $49.95 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Maya; Anachronism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Monarchy; Communalism; Political economy; Ancient history; Geography; Economic history; History; Sociology; Law; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.021062237960945807,"score_gpt":0.3746716993386029,"score_spread":0.3536094613776571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059528998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07469741,0.43619606,0.00042791324,0.13110626,0.0009851233,0.004101561,0.00019960708,0.0006920616,0.35159403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8440217,0.12985024,0.00082444487,0.024126226,0.0004927209,0.00014239259,0.000006843249,0.00004349441,0.0004919522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213773,0.00048000118,0.0009307546,0.0011433605,0.0015158915,0.0037922596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618125,0.0005049158,0.00037193354,0.0006280656,0.0001869344,0.0021268844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002925607,0.00045157393,0.0010721684,0.00012741263,0.0016301785,0.00028138258,0.001397302,0.00011425855,0.00069784763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027308823,0.00039729115,0.00024391963,0.005179343,0.007434018,0.00058316666,0.0002554654,0.0005108362,0.00037036015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030649764,0.00043821373,0.03288067,0.00037255205,0.000054933942,0.00024507992,0.008338092,4.752356e-7,0.000108263266,0.5324206,0.04289092,0.38221955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003223739,0.00010920138,0.0048807533,0.0007018656,0.000056447832,0.000017633502,0.014078687,0.00001158283,0.000007806612,0.0022805163,0.9769037,0.0006294722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020955568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032257233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009651433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013834011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084136514","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402850249","title":"Social Movements and Economic Transition: Markets and Distributive Conflict in Mexico. By Heather L. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 239p. $54.95.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Unrest; Social unrest; Social movement; Distributive property; State (computer science); Political economy; Construct (python library); Sociology; Social conflict; Political science; Development economics; Economic history; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02099036787468898,"score_gpt":0.2919131899159458,"score_spread":0.2709228220412568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084136514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35286653,0.027116327,0.00018824165,0.13240658,0.00021668042,0.0023256491,0.0015888489,0.00015411655,0.48313704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390001,0.052781127,0.000026128855,0.0061074193,0.00007512846,0.0000112119305,0.000006812912,0.000007707801,0.0019843208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973461,0.0003071681,0.0002765605,0.0005227605,0.00024210826,0.001305323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864084,0.00018806265,0.00008495791,0.00013222676,0.0000397795,0.0009141201],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010038133,0.0001789352,0.0004655797,0.00003763076,0.0005232489,0.000074566924,0.00029232565,0.000053949512,0.00011280764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018508754,0.00018235024,0.00006437371,0.0003227402,0.007837606,0.00052802014,0.00009518984,0.00016820093,0.00002074807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010384084,0.00012679187,0.001826906,0.00011747352,0.000017454571,0.000014809387,0.00039791514,4.586385e-8,0.000007659773,0.94158113,0.040307976,0.015591429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045773253,0.0000793379,0.021047281,0.00020529891,0.000046974612,0.000006674498,0.0010080755,0.00018470679,0.00002141597,0.0001873568,0.9763171,0.00043802528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020043317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000112523456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9413938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070864166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018932356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087349263","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402300248","title":"Social Rights Under the Constitution: Government and the Decent Life. By Cecile Fabre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. 202p. $72.00 cloth.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Democracy; Constitution; Politics; Redistribution of income and wealth; Political science; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Law; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.023360687693729617,"score_gpt":0.266718145314843,"score_spread":0.24335745762111338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087349263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029817014,0.01879607,0.00013312465,0.16638751,0.00020919966,0.0006050576,0.00009399443,0.000044825763,0.8107485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9302111,0.045002077,0.000023959354,0.01730798,0.00028833075,0.000011881393,0.0000010767774,0.0000040224486,0.0071495553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974206,0.00031850432,0.0002436595,0.00033781189,0.00058689405,0.001092513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858445,0.00034094564,0.00011003612,0.00019570682,0.00004468873,0.0007241662],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011773247,0.00014334904,0.00034007867,0.000010069149,0.0030791727,0.00009193979,0.00063438097,0.00003492531,0.0006934265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022887252,0.00008339242,0.00012366874,0.00032715808,0.022118133,0.00023839391,0.00014397058,0.00017545244,0.00004118657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004201572,0.000033459055,0.00002864995,0.000014271848,0.000007979895,9.59302e-7,0.00023219505,1.296679e-7,2.0495122e-7,0.9373138,0.05781456,0.0045495634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020001372,0.000020877118,0.00020405967,0.000042450505,0.000050983395,0.000002739584,0.0012651918,0.00005549498,9.763877e-7,0.0033647418,0.99465156,0.00014092906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009666921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019504315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93683696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009089237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035953222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093080193","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402330466","title":"After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. By Glen Newey. New York: Palgrave, 2001. 253p. $68.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Liberalism; Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08256955769673271,"score_gpt":0.3547312467950858,"score_spread":0.27216168909835303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093080193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012100082,0.064500116,0.00007976121,0.23763846,0.0004552808,0.0016029156,0.00015304812,0.00013821988,0.68333215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97380376,0.0059915874,0.0001522915,0.018552447,0.0007130901,0.000036116682,0.0000032601292,0.000019146242,0.00072832906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465275,0.0008607898,0.0008312973,0.00057284604,0.0010990679,0.0019832444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968094,0.00077181344,0.00019457084,0.0005993295,0.00017347802,0.0014513857],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020557044,0.00028755696,0.0007038642,0.00014153747,0.00048070788,0.00010013263,0.0010180591,0.00008735404,0.0011340034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021260872,0.00021720906,0.00025110994,0.0024579016,0.010197762,0.0003048128,0.00013796995,0.00043114094,0.0001757156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005929356,0.00010855687,0.0009488447,0.0001234339,0.000006716391,0.0000055440387,0.0005151088,9.0771096e-8,0.000012136527,0.9872868,0.0072797188,0.0037070992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028020432,0.00030016847,0.0009541395,0.001421212,0.000056451307,0.000012623414,0.0008141024,0.000030389589,0.00006147249,0.67000353,0.32553372,0.0005319835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015592068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041872467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96170366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003843716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005645214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098877340","doi":"10.2307/2586386","title":"Political Parties and Foreign Aid","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":261,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"LISREL; Politics; Foreign policy; Political science; Left-wing politics; Welfare state; Relevance (law); Foreign policy analysis; Political economy; State (computer science); Welfare; Democracy; Economics; Structural equation modeling; Law","score_opus":0.023462084276388212,"score_gpt":0.3637938431761314,"score_spread":0.3403317588997432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098877340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027007125,0.001440004,0.000009016414,0.059774008,0.000047167898,0.00020038447,0.000003940971,0.000055711265,0.91146266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782797,0.0049851756,0.00048551345,0.014568719,0.00013921222,0.000016821316,9.4234e-7,0.000004311748,0.0015196236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750537,0.00009744542,0.00021491204,0.0002690276,0.00067628216,0.0012369648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880457,0.00014102194,0.000031161875,0.00010919117,0.00009313478,0.000820948],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010146531,0.000095294556,0.00021565877,0.000044813954,0.00046566984,0.00009637885,0.00033557872,0.000016326685,0.0015846483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000668888,0.00007606138,0.000048041104,0.0005979864,0.0062663853,0.00030478174,0.000044871835,0.00008254196,0.00029315057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.25715e-7,0.000010997517,0.0011493291,0.000019690562,0.0000016266588,0.0000017198961,0.000056429297,3.999361e-9,0.0000018359009,0.95862275,0.00032147922,0.039813194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001012092,0.00008755052,0.019834435,0.0006263154,0.000027571208,0.000015624773,0.0013054073,0.000013904843,0.000050256727,0.20725419,0.7703137,0.00036985538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020977193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035543875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95127255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018760726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045915428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099357836","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402464313","title":"Reproducing the State. By Jacqueline Stevens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. 307p. $49.50 cloth, $18.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Politics; Ethnic group; Democracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Race (biology); Centrality; White (mutation); Gender studies; Political economy; Anthropology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028464253389429286,"score_gpt":0.31051809362126337,"score_spread":0.2820538402318341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099357836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048365514,0.10550306,0.0005981317,0.1188994,0.0005449304,0.0021686587,0.00033643795,0.00043793267,0.7666749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66409886,0.29217923,0.0011866859,0.026289782,0.0006451394,0.000024506035,0.00001133014,0.000032046955,0.0155324275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945917,0.00070675585,0.0005090272,0.0009088149,0.001315782,0.0019679226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675924,0.0005688434,0.0003222215,0.0009008561,0.00032394158,0.0011248897],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002609437,0.00027990964,0.0005597693,0.00004008875,0.0017277895,0.00013351915,0.0014962563,0.000044113665,0.0006549886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002178119,0.00021097754,0.000176189,0.0016701766,0.018815707,0.0006096784,0.00030114898,0.00038505538,0.00016618118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034421232,0.00009671326,0.00040658502,0.00008597559,0.000013495759,0.000010458213,0.00015029802,0.000002684593,0.000040616036,0.93450606,0.04562505,0.0190586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000756516,0.00006330937,0.00029290334,0.0003092664,0.000053719148,0.000011909161,0.000435573,0.00002749579,0.0000358241,0.00029933758,0.9980836,0.00031139323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045360398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021714527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95245856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008304009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016667461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103247366","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402444334","title":"The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State: Institutions and Interest Group Power in the United States, France, and Japan By Adam D. Sheingate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001. 279p. $45.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interest group; Agrarian society; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Proposition; Political science; State (computer science); Welfare; Power (physics); Political economy; Agriculture; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.019344369349293282,"score_gpt":0.23356832447571188,"score_spread":0.2142239551264186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103247366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440289,0.004829902,2.733128e-7,0.048855733,0.00003174744,0.00047450932,0.0001241425,0.000013040499,0.0016417284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505926,0.047804486,0.0000070669057,0.001366731,0.000020077305,0.000007426752,0.000009775576,7.493086e-7,0.00019108035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825275,0.00023851608,0.00029741492,0.0003267567,0.00020887284,0.000675711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910444,0.00022552366,0.00018843186,0.00013917136,0.000077426674,0.00026498223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005390477,0.00017778281,0.00026314304,0.0000114203085,0.0008080766,0.00010953548,0.00085034355,0.000029185305,0.000028467146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015205803,0.000046973346,0.00006693548,0.0012653542,0.0034096385,0.00024005472,0.0002921443,0.0002457083,0.0000025308523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022298562,0.0004923875,0.029682834,0.00022339745,0.00004700878,0.000005992484,0.0008471884,0.000012391978,0.0017944174,0.8540625,0.019784424,0.093025155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006706159,0.00011919867,0.28970933,0.00015624086,0.000014183909,0.000015708063,0.0011828307,0.000075566175,0.000013047954,0.00006522008,0.7084308,0.00015080452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008634478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011578508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8539973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009498975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001527528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105107444","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000161","title":"The Legacy of Historical Conflict: Evidence from Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Generalitat de Catalunya; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Colonialism; Identity (music); Ethnic conflict; Empirical evidence; Ethnic group; Political economy; Political science; Cultural conflict; Conflict resolution research; Development economics; Sociology; Conflict resolution; Social science; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07766643273799952,"score_gpt":0.3660980161890232,"score_spread":0.2884315834510237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105107444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077735786,0.16464503,0.0009235834,0.24603567,0.0010041615,0.0010696751,0.000008288392,0.00015916074,0.5783808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92043275,0.074865535,0.00058650674,0.0029298929,0.00023234893,0.000033810502,2.8781594e-7,0.0000046554755,0.00091419194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732065,0.00026503048,0.00042756976,0.00034916127,0.00071401993,0.00092354236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968677,0.0018624939,0.00021653606,0.0003280091,0.00023539428,0.0004898579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029727835,0.000120198376,0.00044665975,0.00002764321,0.0010912141,0.00009634887,0.0009055681,0.00001966976,0.000075738586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00963692,0.00007452915,0.0001115729,0.00096283463,0.006271197,0.00033041724,0.00015019104,0.000109095956,0.00008720096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032673934,0.000035513196,0.00333381,0.000054733704,0.000012839084,5.598815e-7,0.0021985562,4.1041353e-8,0.000018897243,0.84361774,0.017452031,0.13327199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026659192,0.00003963242,0.0076016807,0.00039454372,0.00002425632,3.2491025e-7,0.0013411965,0.0000026128823,0.000019572566,0.0034127303,0.9870088,0.00012800975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019671023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051003793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96955675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062374084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005598295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107758351","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000421","title":"On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Nationalism; Democracy; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.05263516533756687,"score_gpt":0.3802951089819447,"score_spread":0.32765994364437784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107758351","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010537961,0.015107858,0.000015008116,0.80740535,0.00008951415,0.00068173476,0.000008033145,0.00003268446,0.16612184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129086,0.00762409,0.000063334526,0.07906203,0.00022768999,0.000032553347,2.707612e-7,0.0000044094395,0.000076999815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968978,0.00070203317,0.00021521527,0.0002232184,0.00084586826,0.0011158634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953497,0.0034754649,0.00007650117,0.00017706261,0.00012207181,0.0007991785],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071061463,0.00011509644,0.00023590794,0.000025661535,0.0022294316,0.00013439254,0.00043980082,0.00003076307,0.000068572044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234045,0.000056387093,0.000053462747,0.00071055326,0.019591207,0.0003481611,0.00014430954,0.00031294898,0.000061734056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018703639,0.000015504938,0.000062644656,0.000042131676,0.0000027715375,1.9332228e-7,0.00039892076,8.267434e-9,0.0000011429569,0.99603057,0.00021357776,0.003230641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007779206,0.000027317486,0.001640733,0.00026875737,0.000037678197,0.000009155612,0.00033029035,0.000016310118,0.000006780278,0.9223832,0.07507251,0.00012947993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008589965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015668427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011325429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043382778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109307809","doi":"10.1017/s0003055409990219","title":"Why Resource-poor Dictators Allow Freer Media: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Panel data; Resource (disambiguation); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.07496121552790794,"score_gpt":0.2929875802133446,"score_spread":0.21802636468543665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109307809","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24413562,0.5479676,0.0016110726,0.18237148,0.00047864427,0.0011068495,0.0006324645,0.00016863471,0.021527605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747646,0.041542124,0.002840918,0.080544636,0.00016653608,0.000011581279,0.000022273498,0.000015258321,0.00009205514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971486,0.000055825247,0.0006884748,0.001016863,0.00013841038,0.00095187867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973707,0.0006779803,0.00028566245,0.0008804522,0.000024069812,0.0007611411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087714,0.00021041912,0.000703419,0.00011643249,0.00016601133,0.00014452678,0.0013799845,0.00003673625,0.00035515035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044039376,0.00018057914,0.00006924417,0.0006165799,0.0013159927,0.00057306956,0.00043447677,0.00020340236,0.00025534112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023184086,0.000061676576,0.007452029,0.0001147238,0.00003358406,0.000013191742,0.0002511947,2.7030126e-7,0.000012511868,0.64435077,0.014182993,0.33350387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002295931,0.00012918538,0.12936628,0.0016120652,0.000045921013,0.000017246282,0.0002058564,0.00055993156,0.00001120789,0.13216886,0.73492086,0.0007329994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001455888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025252659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7207379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018953344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008667859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73638034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110472666","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406232568","title":"<b>2. Douglas A. Hibbs, Jr. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.”</b><b><i>American Political Science Review</i></b><b>71 (December): 1467–1487</b> Cited 492 times.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015124122548526,"score_gpt":0.2808724454544194,"score_spread":0.2657483229058934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110472666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05802411,0.054009665,0.0002797277,0.38569394,0.000922143,0.002680177,0.0013263302,0.000555357,0.49650857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975585,0.013744631,0.00093009934,0.085282974,0.0011550131,0.00019286279,0.00003488895,0.000105547515,0.0009954717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98428303,0.00017923271,0.0031199043,0.002586121,0.0005871879,0.009244508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906589,0.00071521057,0.00093532476,0.0018814328,0.00031796523,0.0054912046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003764158,0.0010667333,0.0032318868,0.0010384964,0.00095627113,0.0006326039,0.0021973513,0.00013971527,0.0008333757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037100054,0.0010421586,0.00061577687,0.0048248465,0.0332631,0.0012481039,0.0010898602,0.00084114465,0.0025916786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069167595,0.00017572421,0.0042114276,0.0009289821,0.000020422443,0.000009396463,0.000014013472,6.534245e-7,0.00001776772,0.98373526,0.008700335,0.002179105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083800236,0.0007666261,0.0597109,0.0025440631,0.0001983299,0.00036716374,0.00019493098,0.000723864,0.00022236325,0.32165986,0.6098867,0.0028871803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055174246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018364139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8395344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027233628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016129712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112477729","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000276","title":"The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Law; Political science; Value (mathematics); Politics; International law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.019007751711571905,"score_gpt":0.3103780644785184,"score_spread":0.29137031276694647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112477729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07088423,0.0015232092,0.0013187245,0.08927715,0.00051185634,0.0010072689,0.000006180576,0.00012206922,0.8353493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852238,0.00020399898,0.00005291046,0.0137967365,0.0006559303,0.000035665227,0.0000021755677,0.0000047991753,0.000023977833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826354,0.000022608947,0.00036840962,0.0001999797,0.00039298856,0.00075250055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927425,0.000118641685,0.00019420084,0.00018302118,0.00018683722,0.000043043805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010649251,0.000094748095,0.00021944263,0.000041823983,0.00025549345,0.00013425777,0.00062020816,0.000014514858,0.0000109772245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038348683,0.00006455346,0.000058625224,0.00090705906,0.0026541674,0.00040576982,0.0001532991,0.000092769485,0.000064257314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011250612,0.000016158057,0.0013299088,0.00007684984,0.0000016256446,1.315963e-7,0.0000022383726,0.0000019411998,0.000013902676,0.98488647,0.00011112592,0.013558521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009453508,0.000018068586,0.033947866,0.0003446642,0.000027529379,0.0000015072376,0.00016649271,0.001521684,0.00001964764,0.7757387,0.18792543,0.00019387726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004031245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014871045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9143396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007797255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007587347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.977939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114736693","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000098","title":"Hobbes on the Causes of War: A Disagreement Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Glory; Ideology; Power (physics); Selfishness; Subversion; Meaning (existential); Anger; Contempt; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.11328378253127572,"score_gpt":0.3062589685639798,"score_spread":0.1929751860327041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114736693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034469668,0.007067416,0.000020462467,0.041904934,0.00043678147,0.00084075716,0.000113905655,0.000082570376,0.9150635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767395,0.0023710555,0.000027623673,0.020350205,0.00020907841,0.000031557054,8.953637e-7,0.000008181695,0.00026185517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978027,0.00020723979,0.000367458,0.00027763253,0.00054440304,0.0008006151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984152,0.0005342869,0.00010725386,0.00044079593,0.00010735264,0.0003951234],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009202094,0.00016511246,0.0003595684,0.00004241724,0.0002555708,0.00002234828,0.0006283313,0.000010037468,0.004964191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072253897,0.00007982384,0.00017309263,0.00022012132,0.00981002,0.00010235962,0.00012315757,0.0001452672,0.0002951264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006262388,0.00015892167,0.000029786523,0.00009982171,0.0000114459135,0.0000013405211,0.00057310285,2.9767309e-9,0.000003547567,0.99329096,0.00030292346,0.005521895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000843072,0.0007052524,0.0011724845,0.0015089797,0.00013877459,0.000004951524,0.0020032146,0.000002648477,0.00072581414,0.7462462,0.24707958,0.00032780328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047654976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012063373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94226986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005168016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007464808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117267371","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402254337","title":"Cycling into Saigon: The Conservative Transition in Ontario By David R. Cameron and Graham White. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2000. 224p. $75.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Presidential system; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Transition (genetics); Political economy; General election; White (mutation); Law; Public administration; Economic history; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.015167141697150029,"score_gpt":0.2488281654350935,"score_spread":0.23366102373794348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117267371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8362088,0.040899154,0.0004757033,0.03375655,0.0003635382,0.0025786532,0.00031774477,0.00009379664,0.085306056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806528,0.013527788,0.00014290564,0.0023482374,0.000028328554,0.000005601422,0.0000011020179,0.000005316725,0.003287916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975298,0.00034502705,0.00031586015,0.00038633082,0.0005884574,0.00083451084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883795,0.00024037741,0.0001744278,0.000187298,0.00011224859,0.00044772198],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011154748,0.000097576,0.00043396003,0.000012486951,0.00044451997,0.00008904716,0.00042234993,0.000040369512,0.00030698738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003663344,0.00011082999,0.00006917078,0.0006937892,0.006890248,0.0003962039,0.000060521943,0.00022152405,0.0000054905236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029339017,0.0012072856,0.23637572,0.0018384489,0.00008083448,0.00012655057,0.044384833,0.0000074958634,0.00012763761,0.14636746,0.33593816,0.23351626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037102253,0.00017564197,0.13648869,0.0027056038,0.00006494707,0.000008962925,0.0045391987,0.00009278964,0.0000035425824,0.0022915688,0.8528155,0.00044250622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5168774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082385965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039107978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117882486","doi":"10.1017/s0003055405051488","title":"Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Epistemology; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Sociology; Popular sovereignty; Solidarity; Collective identity; Impossibility; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04193930035387955,"score_gpt":0.4101236277089392,"score_spread":0.3681843273550596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117882486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15568815,0.00085354474,0.00030027668,0.23830488,0.00033967418,0.0024622101,0.00032589812,0.00021341414,0.60151196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98219,0.0003365809,0.00032941892,0.01668485,0.00031914903,0.000047491114,5.024892e-7,0.000007886533,0.000084086416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944228,0.0011261225,0.000497155,0.0005848306,0.0016669483,0.001702144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996858,0.00064131874,0.0002143642,0.00067908445,0.00038540518,0.0012218419],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037089114,0.00021287601,0.0005194761,0.00004271498,0.0009304237,0.00013203609,0.0018729061,0.000047012632,0.00047888656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006205142,0.00011530301,0.00016198451,0.002462453,0.014407932,0.0010922898,0.00023710458,0.000257408,0.00017947608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061995042,0.00019606954,0.0007102114,0.00003745291,0.0000070281467,9.851093e-7,0.00030042868,3.30698e-7,0.00002001798,0.9916132,0.00017550774,0.0069325618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025293074,0.00080798566,0.021497918,0.0011686035,0.00012407098,0.000004227371,0.0022669153,0.00007957124,0.0006496767,0.92541605,0.046961416,0.0007706307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003885913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8265019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012436028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002153156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118437808","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000323","title":"Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Empowerment; Monopoly; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08701216007564758,"score_gpt":0.38699927196619727,"score_spread":0.2999871118905497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118437808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035142913,0.0023770554,0.0015923096,0.049994797,0.00017613915,0.001232114,0.000008863032,0.00019555124,0.90928024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787315,0.0005205574,0.0014313756,0.019147346,0.00007297439,0.000035899455,4.6265868e-7,0.000010246614,0.00004964617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957478,0.0006321523,0.0003845735,0.0004537474,0.000927044,0.0018546676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978359,0.0005106816,0.00011490985,0.00029899032,0.00013115641,0.0011083717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004908868,0.00017720643,0.00041642142,0.00017396227,0.00047155764,0.00004426848,0.0007186441,0.00004148819,0.00022795434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030412974,0.00012936225,0.00007832451,0.0026983414,0.010842658,0.00028429023,0.00006759504,0.00033161635,0.00009256322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063234274,0.00009340997,0.001734061,0.000104035695,0.0000022183135,0.000013882317,0.0005156061,1.5542454e-7,0.0000026539572,0.99293005,0.00001713602,0.00458045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004315079,0.0007499009,0.033380155,0.0055118343,0.00013232695,0.000011642893,0.004931101,0.000095807285,0.0001755852,0.9471161,0.006374615,0.00108943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00580907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003123637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94358855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003512593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013961765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99184924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119620190","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402210461","title":"More Than a Historian: The Political and Economic Thought of Charles A. Beard By Clyde W. Barrow. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2000. 289p. $39.95.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitution; Database transaction; Interpretation (philosophy); History of political thought; History; Classics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Political philosophy","score_opus":0.026418336589369602,"score_gpt":0.2517636718962875,"score_spread":0.22534533530691792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119620190","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16460262,0.2730172,0.0029533438,0.33520567,0.002229405,0.0020748104,0.0010564488,0.00020699047,0.2186535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733669,0.018866021,0.00026870036,0.00563753,0.00025230186,0.000014974629,0.0000061921833,0.000019222673,0.0015681701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749976,0.000050977043,0.00079818093,0.00059001165,0.000072411225,0.0009886442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998239,0.00015004822,0.0003024471,0.0005175858,0.000026642892,0.0007643242],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008499973,0.00021522568,0.0007017522,0.00010372203,0.00027211776,0.00013791898,0.0005989642,0.000055560988,0.0011191891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003561568,0.0001851566,0.00018862479,0.00043651392,0.0036592796,0.0010444646,0.00005576705,0.00023001137,0.00026416752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021869064,0.000038091945,0.0013658637,0.00006183812,0.000014098263,3.7561497e-7,0.000071776405,6.527446e-7,0.0000069802745,0.98720205,0.005764696,0.0054713627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033182814,0.00017919173,0.0044232346,0.0002290337,0.00006330494,0.00005581357,0.00050270976,0.0005525918,0.00011766622,0.022882443,0.97013015,0.00053203455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011630389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006618187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003815624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122361107","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000559","title":"Coercion and (Global) Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Economic Justice; Socioeconomic status; Global justice; Law and economics; State (computer science); Function (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.11823770859144936,"score_gpt":0.42605502528540157,"score_spread":0.3078173166939522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122361107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042968094,0.00440575,0.00016301684,0.047341388,0.00018997837,0.00028527158,0.000010903416,0.0001061856,0.9432007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961945,0.011284268,0.00089709705,0.025676183,0.00014009372,0.000008695315,2.7083883e-7,0.0000036792999,0.0000447165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729854,0.00022126023,0.00022191711,0.00034072826,0.00061284687,0.0013046883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781024,0.00021290201,0.000058941383,0.00022252814,0.00015440477,0.0015409741],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021053224,0.00010988835,0.00026642828,0.00002918839,0.0006590382,0.00004215538,0.00045237632,0.00003633188,0.00014459314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004143012,0.000090831185,0.00005293209,0.0011612588,0.014818138,0.00031713388,0.00011647902,0.00016686588,0.00016255486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010204928,0.000023574357,0.00028215133,0.000108866436,0.0000013177208,0.00000291773,0.00023747607,1.0931387e-9,0.0000010612296,0.9816464,0.00009801834,0.017597167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007668653,0.00015199975,0.016067162,0.0007316888,0.00020348362,0.000017009108,0.001881524,0.000006196403,0.000017296354,0.8915371,0.08891409,0.0003957778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009984854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009465333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95764816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024334989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061246194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126616776","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401242026","title":"The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. By Dan S. Felsenthal and Moshé Machover. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1998. 322p. $90.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Simple (philosophy); Presidential election; Power (physics); Phenomenon; Presidential system; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029619014260147694,"score_gpt":0.2798716266999759,"score_spread":0.2502526124398282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126616776","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34799638,0.55552375,0.0011330724,0.015330622,0.00031139096,0.0019623712,0.0000884084,0.00007094095,0.077583075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95992094,0.038507897,0.000111073736,0.0013354641,0.000027262502,0.00002283485,7.5458274e-7,0.000012062251,0.00006173488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974737,0.00022365054,0.00074962294,0.0005467039,0.00022344985,0.000782879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976811,0.0009613151,0.0005842169,0.00031172545,0.000068313755,0.00039333565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012815319,0.00019958086,0.0006220556,0.00005683889,0.00033617747,0.00015216338,0.00031107146,0.000040008406,0.0000132006435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043869223,0.00014913263,0.00006097732,0.0004901256,0.0028205458,0.0002526814,0.00016388504,0.00021423184,0.000010621775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020049749,0.00005388747,0.0100406725,0.00029189588,0.00003312889,0.0000016790937,0.00017522548,2.3837924e-7,0.00006620413,0.96904826,0.00013463102,0.020134147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013872471,0.0015269689,0.05586853,0.00506512,0.00030047537,0.00085374183,0.004225632,0.0008154938,0.00024083463,0.11032326,0.81742615,0.0019665642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048298968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006042023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85872495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091030066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004812092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130335340","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000134","title":"Coevolution of Capitalism and Political Representation: The Choice of Electoral Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Incentive; Proportional representation; Legislature; Political science; Political economy; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Electoral reform; Competition (biology); Economics; Law and economics; Law; Market economy; Democracy","score_opus":0.03952988541395845,"score_gpt":0.4314517945858869,"score_spread":0.39192190917192843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130335340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75880235,0.011540985,0.00003132996,0.14601742,0.00096859934,0.0014983971,0.0000398459,0.000068271336,0.08103278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967754,0.0019942792,0.000037089674,0.00080109754,0.00032075867,0.00001497073,3.3238885e-7,0.0000029510043,0.00005310533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998016,0.00018532862,0.00031566207,0.00017896215,0.0005969298,0.0007071103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849373,0.000544981,0.00017009635,0.0001926061,0.00027126583,0.00032729056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012677792,0.00007681132,0.00033530488,0.00003883451,0.0004589202,0.000023531058,0.00032122046,0.000029418143,0.000009198912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041171927,0.00004594484,0.00006815998,0.0010339111,0.017249543,0.00015035176,0.000076968114,0.00014082942,0.0000028116694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.676809e-7,0.000014209836,0.004826069,0.00009137693,0.0000048564298,1.15625525e-7,0.00043176455,1.4874491e-8,0.0001584752,0.9929048,0.00007999932,0.001487765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052575546,0.00061212806,0.7934681,0.001875238,0.0005214594,0.00003925968,0.04335577,0.0001054255,0.0011393932,0.10034389,0.056998428,0.0010151085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10600219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007114014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8925609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000600499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038960215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98542494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131017438","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402304349","title":"Sanctions as Economic Statecraft: Theory and Practice. Edited bySteve Chan and A. Cooper Drury. New York: St Martin's, 2000. 258p. $75.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Craft; Sanctions; Sociology; History; Media studies; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.043655543031762334,"score_gpt":0.29850160272750415,"score_spread":0.2548460596957418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131017438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03718273,0.17118697,0.0025974612,0.109285794,0.0014753521,0.0014210368,0.00065305096,0.00015900309,0.6760386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879069,0.08167648,0.0013296667,0.016656877,0.000496808,0.00008927011,0.000018173592,0.000040261253,0.01178557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789464,0.0000651189,0.000707424,0.00062452216,0.00006590761,0.00064240844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803525,0.0005506858,0.000380004,0.00033630108,0.000057458492,0.0006403201],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015192686,0.00018821553,0.00046796852,0.00022215064,0.0003211955,0.00018445603,0.00023482452,0.000039632447,0.0051498185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020635528,0.00019111202,0.00007732755,0.00047034628,0.0012992708,0.00081853423,0.00010520792,0.00018740678,0.0020144198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004320576,0.000041858602,0.00091858057,0.00002309873,0.000027718788,8.408625e-7,0.00007506733,0.0000026029568,0.0000011818001,0.9709602,0.0134850815,0.0144594675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002600395,0.00015030126,0.004509549,0.0001594259,0.00003851354,0.00012941992,0.0003080608,0.0014617465,0.000002720793,0.036251195,0.9563803,0.0003487279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019869946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025016656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94289523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043206202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013787004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131379390","doi":"10.1017/s0003055403000649","title":"Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2353,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Politics; Corporate governance; Political science; State (computer science); Classics; Sociology; Humanities; Law; History; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05954364214638,"score_gpt":0.3570080009857252,"score_spread":0.2974643588393452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131379390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07084215,0.11240382,0.008267939,0.1374248,0.001656981,0.0031793115,0.00059097295,0.00027685118,0.6653572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590481,0.031984985,0.0009604702,0.005740049,0.000054096607,0.000005035085,1.9841787e-7,0.0000079680785,0.0021990838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969861,0.0004504001,0.00027486513,0.00029199696,0.0007706783,0.0012259409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984572,0.00029672837,0.00028430164,0.0003309876,0.00017634942,0.00045442206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019800458,0.00012391,0.00029272103,0.000017780752,0.00043259247,0.0000578726,0.0008029661,0.000013800311,0.000068335314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070271264,0.00008211248,0.000098784156,0.001362328,0.006282516,0.00023335559,0.000061489234,0.00014992652,0.00003959531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1745717e-7,0.00002863897,0.0006028929,0.000049538747,0.0000031287605,0.0000015121407,0.00025535692,8.831816e-7,0.00005738443,0.9743965,0.00026446095,0.02433898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020651738,0.00009060705,0.13127112,0.0013193532,0.00004728264,0.000009923648,0.0013143964,0.000029141534,0.0015347131,0.0034198575,0.8602751,0.00048200236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007479211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037987652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97097665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019218936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091983343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135628144","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402710368","title":"Multinational Democracies. Edited by Alain G. Gagnon and James Tully. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 428p. $70.00 cloth, $25.00 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Autocracy; Sociology; Political economy; Media studies; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.01636940301766147,"score_gpt":0.2849336848145528,"score_spread":0.2685642817968913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135628144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028384512,0.08846048,0.00034555804,0.17659496,0.0007177976,0.0022481643,0.0011498228,0.00040045156,0.70169824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80687237,0.14509533,0.00053040363,0.016998865,0.00079324556,0.000031868203,0.000013900967,0.000033032273,0.029630955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947974,0.0005045368,0.00044372785,0.0007604004,0.0013802551,0.00211367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671113,0.0006557005,0.00025418613,0.00034658707,0.0002698409,0.001762529],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016347655,0.00027723194,0.0006012656,0.000057747373,0.001064522,0.00015189164,0.00079559704,0.00007816379,0.00027784085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032770655,0.00024829464,0.00013252605,0.0013244266,0.0075532272,0.0008567998,0.00021433317,0.00028227278,0.00009976182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019532506,0.000101788,0.0011090968,0.00013219508,0.000008192788,0.000013302511,0.00005340057,8.74689e-8,0.000051327006,0.6769711,0.3132702,0.0082873795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001838088,0.0000623906,0.008705194,0.00045121976,0.000030661944,0.000013422117,0.00027329448,0.00018198654,0.000018378496,0.000046222343,0.9896772,0.00035620574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11801811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014462156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77848786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082155026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039547367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136227760","doi":"10.1017/s000305540282024x","title":"The Search for Good Government: Understanding the Paradox of Italian Democracy. By Filippo Sabetti. Montreal: McGill–Queens University Press, 2000. 288p. $34.95.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Prosperity; Democracy; Political science; State (computer science); Institution; Sociology; Political economy; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04488011049146586,"score_gpt":0.3010722507663571,"score_spread":0.25619214027489123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136227760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017493931,0.018128771,0.0013082492,0.29189968,0.00026752774,0.0027934045,0.001118719,0.00011025253,0.68262404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95145935,0.04165175,0.00009422384,0.003361664,0.00006864892,0.000015009703,0.0000013469845,0.000010170812,0.0033378443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647355,0.0004139413,0.00033114734,0.0003883465,0.000731242,0.0016617716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964076,0.002193868,0.00015885397,0.00040828975,0.000085016625,0.00074634433],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023070793,0.00015544743,0.00036051054,0.000013157725,0.0023698239,0.000071520124,0.001176249,0.00003982763,0.00010137821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011936564,0.00010089688,0.0001854638,0.0006884324,0.010975976,0.00032216686,0.00016490441,0.0001802209,0.000017559158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030180918,0.000044437867,0.000060203274,0.000053018543,0.00001282503,8.206096e-7,0.00010691668,1.9902447e-7,0.0000026051844,0.96960205,0.00849335,0.021620546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014351931,0.00011730472,0.0002531629,0.00019141783,0.00008647047,0.0000020398963,0.0063193254,0.0002597399,0.00005094001,0.015889686,0.9764676,0.00021881211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01242913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036234257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96797425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015557201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024039134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139127649","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402230245","title":"Rereading Power and Freedom in J. S. Mill. By Bruce Baum. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000. 360p. $65.00 cloth, $24.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Liberalism; Individualism; Toleration; Power (physics); Sociology; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.014724528253477018,"score_gpt":0.29399732341769624,"score_spread":0.2792727951642192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139127649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011700611,0.34954277,0.00002182053,0.0051564234,0.00015872254,0.0005789978,0.000070575195,0.000071090035,0.632699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6938275,0.30175716,0.00037463434,0.0030612992,0.00005213105,0.0000034361071,6.900032e-7,0.000009275644,0.0009138725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656063,0.0004685637,0.00037221573,0.0005344053,0.00063258724,0.001431588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978543,0.00045770922,0.0001358686,0.0003740689,0.00011177364,0.0010662811],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016982667,0.00018547635,0.00054991967,0.000010713585,0.00037006332,0.0000471595,0.0008174733,0.000063364445,0.0027318266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017806044,0.00017410582,0.00009523445,0.00042927702,0.0088600805,0.0013836599,0.00016890271,0.00014906586,0.00003133291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005722647,0.000105139334,0.00068686274,0.00010689833,0.0000058763558,0.0000058347277,0.0009783439,1.1676458e-7,0.00017784521,0.97349346,0.0059375665,0.01849633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021613775,0.00019136388,0.0029003194,0.0011081864,0.000036508605,0.000005686684,0.0030038613,0.00004938383,0.00004077086,0.0031167665,0.988873,0.0004580225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35760978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007011661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010812499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002491051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144662706","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401252010","title":"Public Integrity. By J. Patrick Dobel. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. 260p. $38.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Connotation; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Classification of discontinuities; Gerontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Art history; Art; Medicine; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06212971631764685,"score_gpt":0.3349809738248801,"score_spread":0.27285125750723327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144662706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030407847,0.02853202,0.00027443076,0.1624652,0.00018835132,0.00066163443,0.000107596694,0.00021244431,0.80451757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52698386,0.46437466,0.00019224509,0.00811732,0.00018491347,0.0000043557043,0.000003870778,0.0000088352745,0.00012990848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487466,0.0006528112,0.0003579458,0.0007143758,0.0011440171,0.0022561646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576384,0.00068818283,0.00014275845,0.00043264948,0.00031174283,0.0026608075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025485358,0.00025349433,0.00056258775,0.00017865792,0.0011574898,0.00020600755,0.0011257278,0.00011423906,0.00024118618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004318401,0.00022274244,0.00015045585,0.003773933,0.015304326,0.00094288413,0.00033838494,0.0007232614,0.000076072145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032588357,0.000094702154,0.0012030839,0.0000912688,0.0000062365966,0.00001815833,0.00008749043,1.2126776e-8,0.0000017717713,0.9639431,0.007646028,0.026904847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107147425,0.00008091934,0.0006921127,0.0002048353,0.000036057278,0.000014163436,0.00030192602,0.000010652929,0.000003933111,0.009389318,0.98884964,0.00030930174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08090895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003648514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006039437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012056018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98737544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145224084","doi":"10.1017/s0003055408080386","title":"What Is a “Right to Have Rights”? Three Images of the Politics of Human Rights","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Autonomy; Politics; Law; Reading (process); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04291927670791675,"score_gpt":0.3806523311345332,"score_spread":0.33773305442661644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145224084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35064137,0.0077721933,0.00012167142,0.21503563,0.0009772673,0.0035587049,0.00023367349,0.00017926781,0.42148024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990325,0.0005493593,0.00033674875,0.007899604,0.00024728564,0.000023986495,6.8562133e-7,0.000012361133,0.00060499285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941265,0.00036454792,0.00085572747,0.0006071607,0.0020557141,0.0019903432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959694,0.0004030492,0.00030471684,0.0010396104,0.0006469076,0.0016362739],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001227456,0.00027248584,0.00088739785,0.00016678327,0.0017683004,0.00006200189,0.0021173004,0.00005750639,0.00035866877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091626245,0.00017060335,0.00037592746,0.0023343794,0.026070472,0.000648801,0.00038174304,0.0002462432,0.000108708475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6277527e-7,0.00010430241,0.0006970234,0.00010942322,0.000008959027,0.0000046364835,0.0007072364,4.6749918e-8,0.00012667308,0.99683857,0.0010017786,0.0004005078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018153132,0.000398393,0.009511594,0.0031883006,0.00015086091,0.000020720416,0.00058842,0.0000030040158,0.016469128,0.84340596,0.12540722,0.0006748695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032231655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089521566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6396836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037742322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007426684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146825456","doi":"10.1017/s000305540139202x","title":"Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison. By Ann Chih Lin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 213p. $39.50.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Penology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Prison; Annals; Political science; State (computer science); Public administration; Population; Recidivism; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political economy; History; Demography; Classics","score_opus":0.02554136680226784,"score_gpt":0.3981146784737029,"score_spread":0.3725733116714351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146825456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70131046,0.00907639,0.00028849463,0.17657346,0.00013047845,0.002372769,0.000054357544,0.00006823199,0.110125355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97600836,0.02151477,0.000048173162,0.0021681504,0.00012140641,0.000012561335,0.0000022542367,0.0000036718907,0.000120676574],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973765,0.0004765479,0.00035812127,0.0002869065,0.0006904694,0.00081147853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992194,0.00010753992,0.00022705317,0.00024130465,0.00010090766,0.00010376515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023429745,0.000110869085,0.00029125228,0.00012407894,0.0005957353,0.000058482543,0.00092690357,0.000027133097,0.00005657775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030062415,0.000072353956,0.0001075398,0.0043121073,0.002483118,0.00030066268,0.000112807575,0.00020084083,0.000005361732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017650265,0.00028421945,0.010469394,0.00015510365,0.000015101271,0.000007645707,0.01594987,0.0000017882493,0.00002287853,0.48524818,0.0012271643,0.486601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012482039,0.00008027747,0.08072633,0.00018781592,0.0001410022,0.0000042440524,0.23197836,0.000029175464,0.000009905129,0.0001914066,0.6863411,0.00018553667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26536882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02064143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68511397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013676835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009691546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151241261","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000080","title":"Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Parliament; Delegation; Political science; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Public administration; Negotiation; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.031130516331031925,"score_gpt":0.36840268626737305,"score_spread":0.3372721699363411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151241261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487078,0.00034604635,0.000038388443,0.04144253,0.00021920205,0.000659649,0.0000035019316,0.000035967885,0.008546917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953646,0.00026698638,0.00005671875,0.004030775,0.00022774705,0.000027410228,0.000001865545,0.000003830611,0.000020052705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818283,0.00032726908,0.000261591,0.00021880183,0.00041542985,0.0005940975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992025,0.00016535397,0.00007087242,0.000100925165,0.00014967547,0.0003106619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021753786,0.000066700995,0.0001792258,0.000029020135,0.00038503172,0.00022027064,0.00021138076,0.000027634147,0.000093937495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002188431,0.000052380867,0.000017067332,0.0016293557,0.0020645156,0.00024955126,0.000022886623,0.00015250515,0.000015555761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014621709,0.0000717812,0.047465634,0.0000778781,0.0000015429245,0.0000025930515,0.0005646681,2.2268669e-8,0.0006434109,0.9301243,0.0009103473,0.020136353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004735357,0.00050598825,0.69872665,0.0011712995,0.00006543713,0.000104073195,0.0026578049,0.00007669833,0.00037137597,0.026050922,0.26896304,0.00083315687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06719243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015611052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90407336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008838344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050074625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152177377","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000094","title":"Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":282,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Ethics of care; Diversity (politics); Feminist ethics; Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.07308542215743548,"score_gpt":0.4158490771869438,"score_spread":0.34276365502950834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152177377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80462974,0.0037521687,0.0006430462,0.112542324,0.00030974494,0.0008527319,0.000022628254,0.00008736781,0.077160224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909643,0.001778042,0.0002135605,0.0069101593,0.0000932487,0.000009190596,9.3082457e-7,0.0000025887334,0.00002800885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973541,0.0008136368,0.00022349044,0.00030759044,0.0008408093,0.00046041235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847996,0.000667496,0.00011478086,0.00023415667,0.00023795383,0.00026565976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004609749,0.000085918145,0.00031690838,0.00007267454,0.0009210171,0.00005453673,0.0003765755,0.000027387181,0.0000348974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040830644,0.00005423492,0.000095579155,0.0011946366,0.0076101143,0.000098183686,0.00008308514,0.00021473524,0.0000031087036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033656245,0.00003102446,0.0007489849,0.00015185165,0.000042444135,4.541293e-7,0.0443726,0.000001159502,0.000018452689,0.9238641,0.000027129572,0.030738428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030944493,0.0018612426,0.08934432,0.0018287431,0.001990752,0.000008343358,0.7794009,0.0007520148,0.00021131303,0.085039176,0.03812903,0.0011247193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052220807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072821317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010286618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031392186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159810407","doi":"10.1017/s0003055406062095","title":"Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems: Party, Posts, and Zombie Politicians in Japan","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Incentive; Zombie; Parliament; Reputation; Proportional representation; Single non-transferable vote; Single-member district; Business; Representation (politics); Lower house; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Law; Market economy; Politics; General election; Split-ticket voting; Computer security; Democracy","score_opus":0.02530880291844293,"score_gpt":0.3707189439551659,"score_spread":0.34541014103672296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159810407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561363,0.005456249,0.000008811534,0.0125624025,0.00017268039,0.00082502887,0.0000118627195,0.000052596934,0.024774073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979328,0.0004912676,0.000027087286,0.0010931339,0.00019591933,0.000071090006,0.0000029650969,0.0000104158835,0.00017535168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951954,0.000690917,0.00067456154,0.00049093907,0.0006902703,0.002257933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985104,0.00035435616,0.0001274431,0.00020553348,0.000121461606,0.0006807583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002274012,0.00018859011,0.0005852433,0.00019516377,0.00024275377,0.000151337,0.00030617235,0.000055423057,0.00004358857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009829269,0.00016505927,0.000057342313,0.0022356596,0.0035048432,0.00042299725,0.000066860266,0.00020200243,0.00006255463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014698805,0.00006979035,0.21931785,0.00014370166,0.0000010581493,0.000004558183,0.00007567095,6.327612e-7,0.000048019992,0.77888507,0.00009745078,0.0013547367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002472972,0.00015203118,0.9560342,0.002096098,0.000026825375,0.00000847405,0.0009293445,0.0001158077,0.000042417334,0.016944047,0.02288679,0.0005166663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46052933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0564984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.761941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087595114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053749303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160608470","doi":"10.1017/s000305540221432x","title":"Crossing Borders, Crossing Boundaries: The Role of Scientists in the U.S. Acid Rain Debate. By Leslie R. Alm. Westport, CT: Praeger. 2000. 160p. $58.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Science and Climate Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acid rain; Political science; Science policy; Focus (optics); Process (computing); Environmental policy; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.015017514078191033,"score_gpt":0.30847684659742763,"score_spread":0.2934593325192366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160608470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.544049,0.16946915,0.00018618266,0.099823,0.00048229864,0.002485634,0.00009734807,0.00013192403,0.18327543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831553,0.004999303,0.0002808861,0.011312854,0.000027869446,0.00004702637,0.0000015159197,0.0000118575645,0.00016339502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946287,0.00024467095,0.0006884254,0.00078703405,0.0017062111,0.0019449379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982816,0.00028371057,0.0003101177,0.0007522353,0.00004062613,0.00033173786],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004183637,0.00029090262,0.00051159575,0.00005527166,0.004073456,0.0017126477,0.0019561525,0.000021276564,0.0011836806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012689965,0.00016274849,0.00014455484,0.0042665103,0.068482555,0.0008444506,0.0005054757,0.00028673405,0.00020386529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013644666,0.0012452743,0.12545498,0.00044471168,0.00003123597,0.000095399555,0.014904196,0.000025448468,0.014215413,0.036320966,0.08506942,0.7221793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001636564,0.0001411396,0.024205143,0.0005744299,0.00004246349,0.00013650699,0.004090804,0.0005717647,0.0009688397,0.0019076678,0.9667143,0.00048323706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007081583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003957949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8816449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004346997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041065793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168663113","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401742025","title":"The Geography of Money. By Benjamin J. Cohen. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1998. 229p. $37.50 cloth, $17.95 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Restructuring; Politics; Function (biology); Style (visual arts); Economic history; Political economy; Political science; Economics; History; Law","score_opus":0.014684914793742655,"score_gpt":0.22659611737425722,"score_spread":0.21191120258051457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168663113","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19155823,0.7103405,0.00019649224,0.009827098,0.00022072172,0.00082026527,0.0009574123,0.000054944132,0.08602432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5549411,0.44223467,0.00006750912,0.0025256837,0.0000317588,0.0000035570924,0.000003220918,0.000007070617,0.00018545464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802953,0.00004100343,0.0004916317,0.00044506553,0.000111202724,0.0008815724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986328,0.00016021132,0.00033061494,0.00042698713,0.0000485449,0.00040083317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081764,0.00017611076,0.0005986297,0.000036573238,0.00030714244,0.00006350027,0.0006159301,0.000036553734,0.00003853761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023003589,0.00014466188,0.00015412884,0.001001066,0.003546258,0.0002483169,0.00018159238,0.00013317713,0.000034838264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008328825,0.000069834925,0.04780633,0.00010774969,0.000014913026,0.0000026132575,0.000015064554,6.456751e-7,0.000007731211,0.91773266,0.024178933,0.010055203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009938967,0.0001248668,0.06457156,0.00010717317,0.000019705392,0.000008328338,0.000048527454,0.000041040734,0.000009485044,0.0043535237,0.93042296,0.00019345187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014910856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036029163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91337913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008306273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048287664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187082881","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000241","title":"The Primary Effect: Preference Votes and Political Promotions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Primary election; Politics; Exploit; Political science; Regression discontinuity design; Analogy; Competence (human resources); Microeconomics; General election; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Computer security; Statistics","score_opus":0.04284344300457281,"score_gpt":0.3836081709961832,"score_spread":0.3407647279916104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187082881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18379374,0.004088973,0.0009532283,0.69326633,0.00037557186,0.00235408,0.000020979664,0.00028528747,0.11486184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563336,0.0009291261,0.000053200354,0.0027427333,0.00020260976,0.00009506435,3.3974516e-7,0.0000064396677,0.00033714983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959248,0.0007575725,0.00033071186,0.00035591805,0.000705509,0.0019255378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955886,0.0024911875,0.000082583596,0.00028813517,0.0001690461,0.0013804697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032091294,0.00013398727,0.00031785894,0.00003236396,0.001142248,0.00013339732,0.0004049342,0.000030404772,0.000033946977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073668375,0.00006362504,0.00006471814,0.0007129004,0.010166499,0.00024559963,0.000091640926,0.00010111305,0.00011461443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010662868,0.000010847638,0.0048486292,0.00007011784,0.0000019372567,2.7788278e-7,0.000013920931,1.011044e-9,0.00010190093,0.92396814,0.00011741514,0.07086573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004722704,0.0016142711,0.31923544,0.005344876,0.00022479796,0.000030120656,0.00019705809,0.000019175879,0.00074368133,0.2955906,0.37539706,0.0011306287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054105497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004020282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038654567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004786606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99252725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203970239","doi":"10.2307/2586231","title":"The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions. By J. W. Tubbs. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. 253p. $42.50.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013905505361678217,"score_gpt":0.29971205071297474,"score_spread":0.2858065453512965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203970239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36980268,0.04851575,0.000064697124,0.09337355,0.00017590303,0.0014986779,0.00014219776,0.00014400504,0.48628253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69813704,0.29952502,0.00005213716,0.0016899637,0.00006989266,0.0000035790374,0.0000014451493,0.000004864233,0.0005160118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977561,0.00028201373,0.00020933303,0.0003727164,0.00057310035,0.00080669345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986131,0.00026932798,0.00007920781,0.00022824472,0.00008030509,0.0007297688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010393083,0.00013322772,0.00029363082,0.000029088247,0.0016822108,0.00018149888,0.00039675977,0.00003766455,0.00013452795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008622759,0.00010072532,0.000057490703,0.00061438145,0.012576591,0.00041480354,0.00008457717,0.00016835608,0.0000133834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010522133,0.00003879453,0.0006364193,0.000030504087,0.000008056207,0.0000035738656,0.0011168544,1.06286905e-7,0.000008596828,0.28306824,0.0011232682,0.71395504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009873118,0.00008310972,0.004526389,0.00012733215,0.000044440854,0.000005458286,0.00028322477,0.000048587848,0.0000037580583,0.00029282988,0.9943464,0.00013977081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097965404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026088038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017820873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024812936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255458947","doi":"10.1017/s0003055415000453","title":"Mixing Methods: A Bayesian Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process tracing; Causal inference; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Process (computing); Econometrics; Management science; Bayesian inference; Qualitative property; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Data science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.29580603943462885,"score_gpt":0.6121796969617302,"score_spread":0.3163736575271014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255458947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003906215,0.010700698,0.18197419,0.028236512,0.00006391981,0.0006599607,0.0000028529066,0.00009966796,0.7778716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74694383,0.0044103325,0.23501523,0.011398098,0.00031801866,0.0001574722,0.0000032521307,0.000021345066,0.0017324318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141264,0.0041229934,0.00038609013,0.00056394516,0.0017972302,0.0017171076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539584,0.0008788594,0.00013464155,0.00040693497,0.0008175102,0.0023662304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021262554,0.00014669493,0.00059787853,0.00019149957,0.0005492408,0.0001624658,0.0011691039,0.000020252037,0.0002663361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020335922,0.00011439212,0.00014709755,0.006030277,0.011962409,0.00046604144,0.00019857672,0.00022641644,0.00038281773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013280049,0.000055742083,0.00026269016,0.000053073567,0.000009619167,0.0000013840657,0.0018123596,3.519852e-7,0.000034845518,0.93063474,0.0024019668,0.06473192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018196992,0.00021898489,0.0010427652,0.0005621462,0.00010308266,0.000006827233,0.04662689,0.0015125775,0.00015787475,0.07581668,0.8730333,0.0007369191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007671276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007257699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87063134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083763426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023175755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275893291","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401822012","title":"The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century. By Robert Gilpin, with the assistance of Jean Millis Gilpin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 373p. $29.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Globalization, Economics, and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Capitalism; Investment (military); World economy; Political science; Economic history; Economy; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01283131898038875,"score_gpt":0.23208920207224723,"score_spread":0.21925788309185848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275893291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028183827,0.25136095,0.00015510996,0.17865379,0.00023521871,0.002076485,0.000701661,0.000032947148,0.5386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7355976,0.26074973,0.000039059192,0.0031299829,0.00005426002,0.00001884671,0.0000050127846,0.000009972667,0.00039551986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976321,0.00015578834,0.0007368118,0.0004705976,0.000137637,0.00086705433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976023,0.0003575766,0.00081199815,0.0009547113,0.00010863344,0.00016478015],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018486596,0.00022572634,0.0006166942,0.000037405993,0.00040337045,0.00009778456,0.0019650082,0.000030715466,0.000043652137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021469076,0.00012631695,0.00014530809,0.0013665078,0.004605485,0.0003072674,0.0001612956,0.0001748394,0.000015212656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076925135,0.000065667344,0.015060555,0.00007897623,0.000019954728,5.80362e-7,0.00015665963,0.000015489475,1.2035562e-7,0.98029053,0.0027140502,0.0015897334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014703909,0.000065206936,0.022088569,0.00013350583,0.000021789772,0.0000049128676,0.00085835566,0.00009050533,0.0000035124353,0.0030681307,0.97333336,0.00018510612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009732761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004554171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052627566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021158348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277291112","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401732017","title":"Feminists and Party Politics. By Lisa Young. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2000. 227p. $75.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Feminism; Gender studies; Bridge (graph theory); Political science; Comparative politics; Regionalism (politics); Element (criminal law); Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.016937218601069066,"score_gpt":0.2994731025484096,"score_spread":0.2825358839473405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277291112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.295627,0.03475199,0.00024023595,0.013672792,0.0008239847,0.0019832712,0.00070744846,0.00020162771,0.65199167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255413,0.061195485,0.0003307236,0.0010966309,0.00008123897,0.0000029437952,0.0000049183573,0.000007895278,0.011738893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725944,0.0001957639,0.00026756676,0.0004341314,0.0007102853,0.0011328089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982102,0.000115885814,0.00016075937,0.00031848173,0.00022859321,0.0009660932],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084170233,0.000094968476,0.00036653603,0.00002172843,0.00058164715,0.00014099025,0.0005662964,0.00004155946,0.000334973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000555361,0.00013097115,0.000080626436,0.00068341766,0.007295653,0.00027155076,0.00017684203,0.00010993275,0.000009462685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004939751,0.00048515754,0.12215572,0.00069578877,0.000044556025,0.0000741276,0.00240441,3.1189603e-7,0.000064340886,0.12503827,0.67047906,0.07855335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018913715,0.00008792218,0.031122742,0.00036378874,0.000076366305,0.00002443062,0.004512938,0.000015664229,0.0000075334497,0.0041616936,0.9591357,0.00030209532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66694164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050249044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64025277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000268655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000687049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281194592","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401912018","title":"Globalizing Concern for Women’s Human Rights: The Failure of the American Model. By Diana G. Zoelle. New York: St. Martin’s, 2000. 169p. $49.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Human rights; Panacea (medicine); Convention; Multinational corporation; Democracy; Ideology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03752125067306954,"score_gpt":0.3422662927023365,"score_spread":0.30474504202926694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281194592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67789936,0.0409245,0.0068778917,0.18818547,0.000888017,0.0072843065,0.000842191,0.0004085501,0.0766897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008674,0.004642886,0.00054957723,0.0122899255,0.00021628728,0.000097089076,0.0000045209104,0.000020733607,0.0020922425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507946,0.00036392795,0.00061119546,0.00060054834,0.0011590834,0.0021857796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972414,0.00028230567,0.00051344826,0.00073234324,0.0002463677,0.0009841494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020368025,0.00028205328,0.000707574,0.00003800633,0.0018204234,0.00014112564,0.002122641,0.000041962765,0.00006673972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005802098,0.00016663138,0.0002646936,0.0029145014,0.011327716,0.00022259187,0.00018311085,0.00022664803,0.00001313208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011045234,0.0001723668,0.014414587,0.00017746026,0.000051035076,0.0000016247511,0.0045201266,0.00002636546,0.0001516229,0.8561421,0.09724097,0.027090676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021924159,0.000194171,0.002709078,0.00036471477,0.00011297767,0.0000041496296,0.013188656,0.0009000692,0.000010450381,0.028980272,0.9528028,0.00051343295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05261111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005641579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8555618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009940192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014967398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290841886","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401812016","title":"Exploring European Social Policy. By Robert R. Geyer. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2000. 272p. $50.00 cloth, $14.99 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; European union; Politics; Political science; Dimension (graph theory); Economic history; Political economy; European integration; Sociology; Law; Economics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.07259502187151354,"score_gpt":0.35599170774460326,"score_spread":0.28339668587308975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290841886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008567086,0.019302437,0.00008818773,0.066412516,0.00033681723,0.00066506414,0.00015985832,0.00032612492,0.9041419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7277981,0.2154047,0.00015495071,0.043598317,0.0029515398,0.000054170272,0.000009387194,0.000069857786,0.009958967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180686,0.0013497779,0.0008083118,0.0010055228,0.0016616766,0.0033678275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655604,0.00023053531,0.00042079092,0.00068882207,0.0002550554,0.001848748],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035654495,0.00042450178,0.00073903886,0.00010062344,0.0018816305,0.00029648456,0.0019424518,0.000044206343,0.00033951123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036935802,0.00038830537,0.00029716783,0.0028113748,0.007782899,0.0012731493,0.0004205896,0.00048128053,0.00051593955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008763779,0.00015011283,0.0007126816,0.0001325312,0.000013715488,0.000028646256,0.00063457823,2.8363397e-7,0.0000860473,0.8113166,0.110404454,0.076511554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013672655,0.00006390612,0.02489195,0.00041920753,0.000028733753,0.000015828045,0.000284655,0.0000017569535,0.000032554763,0.0002575102,0.9733622,0.00050495134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20673439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003924229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012618998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014891904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325250763","doi":"10.2307/2586294","title":"The Netherlands: Negotiating Sovereignty in an Interdependent World. By Thomas R. Rochon. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1999. 318p. $65.00.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Sovereignty; Negotiation; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.020275193968190067,"score_gpt":0.374502901466702,"score_spread":0.35422770749851196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325250763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011520411,0.048202522,0.00003992554,0.0130381975,0.00017151132,0.00071045227,0.00003820423,0.00011172991,0.9261671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052254,0.07501934,0.00007538091,0.0152480025,0.00027432415,0.00002880308,0.0000035813591,0.000020615735,0.004104572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944706,0.0014412139,0.0006127112,0.0005842365,0.0010504276,0.0018408152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977293,0.00052641536,0.0002401483,0.0005442106,0.000075079355,0.00088482205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043706303,0.0002297674,0.00041506402,0.000055047214,0.0010339589,0.0004093559,0.0016251896,0.000026141388,0.00049508765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011217184,0.00016113598,0.00011156535,0.0019627968,0.0046992097,0.0006132331,0.000098095035,0.00040949264,0.00026465792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007761545,0.00011862204,0.0028657932,0.00004470676,0.000004465119,0.0000126330015,0.0006736923,0.0000029006553,0.000014954196,0.69220406,0.0104096355,0.2936408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013977321,0.000095583186,0.006692383,0.00071114436,0.000012102772,0.000006841005,0.0011149946,0.00004815973,0.000017222394,0.002854358,0.98797506,0.00033235463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01808865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025347613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97756547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039750087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042975447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475647266","doi":"10.2307/2586253","title":"Comparative Peace Processes in Latin America. Edited by Cynthia J. Arnson. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999. 216p. $60.00 cloth, $24.00 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Center (category theory); Latin Americans; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.019716511217039625,"score_gpt":0.3280309282710425,"score_spread":0.3083144170540029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475647266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055963833,0.044935074,0.0005869254,0.034653623,0.0004217425,0.0037693242,0.00073370535,0.0004698312,0.85846597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.754246,0.22935794,0.004187692,0.0048192893,0.0002537298,0.000070582915,0.000055253695,0.00004347569,0.0069660395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950376,0.0005683268,0.0006111234,0.00081917946,0.0014656018,0.0014981489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971879,0.00094004977,0.000377533,0.0003617127,0.00040248595,0.0007303102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010383629,0.00033767254,0.00073520816,0.00012300166,0.00069611793,0.00020880913,0.0010796029,0.000072815266,0.00077778386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016729565,0.00031494658,0.00008845871,0.0026214104,0.007927592,0.0015011865,0.00017320488,0.00048282172,0.000044631208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032249512,0.0019743885,0.012376827,0.001674686,0.00019830104,0.000075430005,0.02249788,0.00024156318,0.00014896326,0.50641197,0.22766425,0.22641322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022726048,0.00012709716,0.0014867923,0.000908782,0.000030444851,0.0000032156722,0.002726032,0.00031787332,0.000025302666,0.00016736198,0.99358207,0.0003977384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03669345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040738043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8514999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009618288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009018915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476773167","doi":"10.2307/2586389","title":"Machiavelli's Romans: Liberty and Greatness in <i>The Discourses on Livy</i>. By J. Patrick Coby. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999. 267p. $65.00 cloth, $23.95 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Greatness; Content (measure theory); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Political science; Art; Literature; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019888506426649872,"score_gpt":0.2791265363852186,"score_spread":0.25923802995856876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476773167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07533842,0.21991807,0.000006780294,0.14073697,0.00055218505,0.0023159666,0.0007589288,0.0002670583,0.5601056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83009905,0.09895533,0.000027303095,0.06805099,0.0008255455,0.00009930915,0.00003714541,0.000037046917,0.0018683092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957665,0.000395186,0.00062313175,0.00075578137,0.0008604043,0.0015989525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979188,0.00064379134,0.000106982196,0.0005399132,0.00004938062,0.0007411215],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792354,0.00041767504,0.0007177349,0.0000660341,0.000576757,0.00031168075,0.00080660346,0.000044100034,0.0019474133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000188548,0.0002456658,0.00018762889,0.0004873202,0.005654135,0.00038395505,0.0000887746,0.00046315408,0.00036865042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015660598,0.00027636558,0.00013274228,0.00021154279,0.000008471618,0.000018031666,0.0003755911,9.813759e-8,0.000003719284,0.9458026,0.010474195,0.042680934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019960388,0.00041037728,0.0003936385,0.0011069762,0.00006853824,0.00003080485,0.00035248484,0.000016726855,0.000016810924,0.03013016,0.9668252,0.00044870464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057759825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013103095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011565687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012140879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489258484","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000570","title":"Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Variation (astronomy); Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Armed conflict; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Data science; History; Law","score_opus":0.07314714434523127,"score_gpt":0.41766532487090746,"score_spread":0.3445181805256762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489258484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44497722,0.004431195,0.0015423938,0.14693715,0.0009625246,0.002087412,0.00030638793,0.0002200539,0.39853567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282783,0.0025853112,0.00030339274,0.0034533194,0.00070873275,0.00001000156,6.140552e-7,0.000009233948,0.000101583195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574155,0.00024096745,0.000519186,0.0004110971,0.0011604591,0.0019267243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967735,0.00061557005,0.00037589253,0.00085660064,0.0002950083,0.0010834452],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026063889,0.00016875123,0.000511488,0.00004457264,0.0018606618,0.00018549895,0.0018092145,0.00004945848,0.00006461349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112330755,0.000114428476,0.00016089427,0.0005881227,0.018492538,0.0006004303,0.0002790856,0.00026614725,0.000037326394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.054378e-7,0.000015305344,0.023501148,0.00006588241,0.000004554638,9.083688e-7,0.00006571562,4.0006228e-8,0.00006546904,0.95577544,0.000026149222,0.020478474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024452258,0.00020155127,0.8068293,0.0075561334,0.0003574089,0.000013147906,0.0016516539,0.0002038855,0.00071150466,0.04766204,0.13393317,0.0006357319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060959693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074094765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9081134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040214916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010768472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492772346","doi":"10.2307/2586105","title":"Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. By Richard Wyn Jones. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999. 196p. $49.95.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015467345222469332,"score_gpt":0.3653537686849446,"score_spread":0.3498864234624753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492772346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078312755,0.30286625,0.000047749912,0.1032039,0.00036910616,0.0016259077,0.000335996,0.0004798263,0.5127585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.819598,0.16994888,0.000048206322,0.009678227,0.00018830516,0.000047720703,0.0000051568636,0.000015629708,0.0004698649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941524,0.0007473877,0.000534216,0.0009010756,0.00125755,0.0024073254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965124,0.0010646292,0.00009459764,0.00041684884,0.00020536625,0.0017061273],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003463443,0.00034482335,0.000801693,0.00006158472,0.0018806465,0.0003007013,0.0008231566,0.0000813451,0.0017911498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002795119,0.00029328416,0.00016876694,0.0017285736,0.025174832,0.0006250299,0.00016968898,0.000420604,0.0002846323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005808258,0.00015524757,0.00033635317,0.00018332557,0.000014088859,0.000013009885,0.0009712445,2.4310495e-8,0.000007735705,0.888232,0.016717823,0.09336332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017042748,0.00022172982,0.0007941048,0.0005913519,0.00012639006,0.00002097029,0.007061224,0.000006066528,0.00002022043,0.065937325,0.92441815,0.0006320486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0131346565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067919696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023353634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000543783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498699788","doi":"10.2307/2586062","title":"All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. By Michael Herb. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999. 352p. $49.50.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute monarchy; Monarchy; Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.054240415159527815,"score_gpt":0.30757044686286106,"score_spread":0.25333003170333324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498699788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47929028,0.22657108,0.000095896234,0.17902882,0.00008095686,0.002090887,0.00015756406,0.000056702716,0.11262783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90631545,0.08010004,0.00011868547,0.012168246,0.00004196386,0.0000037269326,0.0000016129372,0.0000055823143,0.0012446876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683726,0.0005993207,0.00031034724,0.00034984687,0.0007561787,0.0011470696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987069,0.0004238686,0.00011229939,0.0003277196,0.00003450323,0.0003947041],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019094383,0.00014239243,0.00034509727,0.000029542143,0.00028256542,0.000047367215,0.0012121298,0.000028952732,0.00004581905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003672452,0.00009764245,0.00006777374,0.0010697242,0.0056503853,0.00026434634,0.0000762378,0.00024013815,0.000031798816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044000408,0.0004134763,0.017274214,0.00041078942,0.000018430266,0.000035167886,0.030482989,0.0000024451624,0.000044407927,0.6995122,0.03632125,0.21544066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001367717,0.000046020956,0.08610204,0.000454212,0.000021794871,0.0000035190074,0.0025374414,0.00004081568,0.0000010889447,0.008013884,0.90248126,0.0001611544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49279687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005719079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86616004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001508109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004971023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99705565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506422090","doi":"10.2307/2586228","title":"Acting in Concert: Music, Community, and Political Action. By Mark Mattern. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998. 240p. $50.00 cloth, $20.00 paper.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Music History and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Montana","keywords":"Action (physics); Politics; Political action; Media studies; Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Art; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04050179313464677,"score_gpt":0.27223105470299735,"score_spread":0.23172926156835058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506422090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020423034,0.0110852765,0.0000074132213,0.01049511,0.0002001161,0.0005108727,0.00008631104,0.00012838935,0.9570635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297426,0.008686273,0.000109621935,0.042753458,0.0005047277,0.000006572138,0.000026421452,0.00003259477,0.018137762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973468,0.0003896077,0.00032758422,0.00040193036,0.0004039425,0.0011301326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983763,0.000237565,0.00009828722,0.00038061835,0.000038639308,0.0008685671],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005383608,0.00025014268,0.00050306454,0.00004785559,0.0009957,0.00017191724,0.0005953005,0.000044482476,0.0087398775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009087349,0.00021564623,0.00010025382,0.00023760043,0.0051023043,0.0006855903,0.00012619107,0.0005815222,0.000112245776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029170129,0.00021890075,0.000262096,0.0007030082,0.000022266753,0.000020701847,0.0037873695,3.1927053e-7,0.0001574453,0.6343401,0.3096775,0.050781094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017311059,0.000076489094,0.00021185743,0.0006230443,0.000038525257,0.000018271041,0.0032077515,0.000007847917,0.000016947077,0.00035048265,0.99498993,0.00028573343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10277778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002619635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039872917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046926242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99760526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567622053","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000393","title":"Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Normative; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07368246469849857,"score_gpt":0.4173249267825241,"score_spread":0.3436424620840255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567622053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005427467,0.0052215266,0.00048135562,0.4593423,0.0005447112,0.00067860534,0.00007935479,0.00028236766,0.5279423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97154754,0.0042894115,0.00026941957,0.022839528,0.00084985513,0.000030298577,9.908418e-7,0.000017149792,0.0001557799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371207,0.0005212401,0.0005318379,0.0007823249,0.00134389,0.0031086209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938393,0.0016373673,0.00011439899,0.00051335065,0.00038470453,0.0035108817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003101497,0.00028110296,0.00070615846,0.0001333733,0.0009896,0.00011088612,0.000862154,0.00008857903,0.00021547257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01803253,0.00018537446,0.00016752935,0.0012577476,0.027424654,0.00040638685,0.00026160164,0.00026658038,0.00024681533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023885204,0.00005249363,0.0003618415,0.00015638294,0.0000070881506,0.0000097907305,0.000053784213,2.5014042e-9,0.000016460193,0.9893182,0.00008258387,0.009938998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015750315,0.00011683166,0.0016908522,0.0014318653,0.00011091686,0.000016871873,0.00020887065,0.0000020321127,0.000063642576,0.9149105,0.080821365,0.00046877709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054134843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005274151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005651792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016364834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569043970","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000314","title":"Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Voting; Survey data collection; Economics; Voting behavior; Disapproval voting; Public economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.2021885000756728,"score_gpt":0.4871787403623084,"score_spread":0.2849902402866356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569043970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7603487,0.0008758172,0.00023167516,0.23139867,0.0005047378,0.0009689824,0.0000807348,0.0000752577,0.0055154525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929782,0.00029825192,0.00017864256,0.005936984,0.0004599641,0.000028730019,0.00000433731,0.0000098584605,0.00010502862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961302,0.00074306433,0.00045999326,0.00070393406,0.0006809326,0.001281845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473894,0.0018732179,0.00031800402,0.001982918,0.000108791806,0.000978146],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072873477,0.00016516307,0.0004427755,0.000035340905,0.0021007275,0.0007268014,0.003613276,0.00003242937,0.000088314446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020992668,0.00011241349,0.000060989834,0.00030551842,0.0035656262,0.0007904285,0.00071264955,0.00020337873,0.00065150514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023771952,0.000046742614,0.33987528,0.00017289023,0.00002229466,0.0000064949486,0.0012449911,0.0000017842411,0.0001123272,0.574749,0.0019521761,0.08179229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000734539,0.00016205967,0.96651995,0.0052052396,0.00006075035,0.0000011759977,0.00029264498,0.000334349,0.000063199295,0.007929421,0.018808713,0.00054902013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6142149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051416095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62664473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065844133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007863929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589179404","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000605","title":"A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":459,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sophistication; Sketch; Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Voting; Deliberative democracy; Democratic theory; Political science; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Polycentricity; Power (physics); Law and economics; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.07751967023305721,"score_gpt":0.42145263960019386,"score_spread":0.34393296936713663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589179404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036730908,0.00045506065,0.003257084,0.14145389,0.00008394502,0.00070500566,0.0000072435514,0.00008389502,0.85358655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438607,0.00035969165,0.0058726124,0.049249273,0.00023232675,0.0000878529,6.1653276e-7,0.0000102522035,0.00032664154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558985,0.0004715968,0.00031299304,0.00054190116,0.00110278,0.0019808488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959133,0.00050924195,0.00014395737,0.00090832723,0.0002233275,0.0023018157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064436514,0.00016904352,0.00043835188,0.0000745669,0.0028571456,0.00031924475,0.0020942662,0.000045069824,0.000056976914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015157845,0.00013285028,0.00013591106,0.0007272719,0.016833853,0.00039408525,0.00020525423,0.00028433464,0.00028360618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019396468,0.0000689501,0.000080915794,0.00015503388,0.0000020115147,0.0000013692131,0.00011674496,3.369835e-7,0.0000044747153,0.9814754,0.00023824086,0.017854543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008757784,0.000115583556,0.0018082351,0.0010041074,0.000060859893,0.0000023255582,0.0003052125,0.000046931444,0.00002840223,0.9278968,0.068230554,0.00041343374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034980916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041649386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018205434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621070810","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000107","title":"Montesquieu's Teaching on the Dangers of Extreme Corrections: Japan, the Catholic Inquisition, and Moderation in<i>The Spirit of the Laws</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Enlightenment; Orientalism; Law; Neutrality; Eurocentrism; Notice; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06622258284227618,"score_gpt":0.3888059236055659,"score_spread":0.3225833407632897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621070810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6596177,0.0016661618,0.000082030645,0.23177463,0.00020650862,0.0012604547,0.000016015547,0.000015961685,0.10536049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862354,0.0008841027,0.000019860896,0.01272183,0.000068228,0.000035380715,1.07977435e-7,0.0000027000813,0.000032426444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973583,0.0010595509,0.00029661803,0.00019708372,0.0005942684,0.00049416994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975918,0.0012381627,0.00024775538,0.000706723,0.000102228725,0.00011330719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062574963,0.00009203232,0.00021055341,0.000023321538,0.0023685931,0.0001296289,0.0013722633,0.000020067451,0.000014634965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010509797,0.000038845912,0.00008064949,0.0004043354,0.016730791,0.00031008184,0.000118735166,0.00027975475,0.000003849927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012776453,0.000025416732,0.000946958,0.000020537951,0.000001277217,1.1497944e-7,0.0017740348,8.391571e-7,0.0000681228,0.9869426,0.00005982284,0.010158992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034918153,0.0005543655,0.40180236,0.0068831877,0.0002554071,0.00003135976,0.043597307,0.0006971855,0.0012337094,0.4247726,0.119047366,0.00077597325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041187953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081457045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021485459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734757516","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000259","title":"Does Democratic Consolidation Lead to a Decline in Voter Turnout? Global Evidence Since 1939","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Turnout; Voting; Democracy; Political economy; Dictatorship; Political science; Opposition (politics); Consolidation (business); Democratic consolidation; Voter turnout; Legislature; Salience (neuroscience); Context (archaeology); Development economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Politics; Law; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.07444486485491321,"score_gpt":0.4673315746379286,"score_spread":0.39288670978301543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734757516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32859716,0.0011187006,0.0007119038,0.6504606,0.0006100907,0.0021508601,0.000019583493,0.00009150727,0.016239606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760605,0.00049014075,0.00043871836,0.010987298,0.00022516777,0.00009488747,5.65015e-7,0.000004941364,0.00015221785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961025,0.00039582993,0.0005295368,0.00049827906,0.00093191763,0.0015419545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997461,0.00039938148,0.00021925481,0.0005895088,0.00025041148,0.0010804022],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029585867,0.0001575039,0.00045944905,0.000051368388,0.00086825975,0.00037923508,0.0010275374,0.00003836869,0.000057721525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018540196,0.00010183685,0.000074678064,0.0009369668,0.0037339877,0.0008702528,0.00019859523,0.00012610827,0.00025703327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010641676,0.0000699174,0.1619785,0.00022526736,0.0000031259547,0.000009243544,0.00015256973,6.5551677e-7,0.00013747207,0.7853635,0.00027142387,0.051777706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028864967,0.0005843402,0.8217469,0.013172063,0.00010316191,0.000008073022,0.00039600368,0.00027013084,0.00028794192,0.11851112,0.043512665,0.0011189543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10022938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03418917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66685236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008837941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009101941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736330361","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000138","title":"Ethnic Segregation and Public Goods: Evidence from Indonesia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fractionalization; Public good; Ethnic group; Leverage (statistics); Decentralization; Diversity (politics); Distribution (mathematics); Development economics; Political science; Economics; Economic geography; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.11666830580528773,"score_gpt":0.4162851425426253,"score_spread":0.2996168367373375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736330361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55089724,0.11292668,0.0004870739,0.21045063,0.00059986877,0.0014977655,0.000016405631,0.00031377265,0.12281058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308439,0.060864393,0.000846476,0.007118916,0.00022814308,0.000025896954,8.840337e-7,0.0000036709355,0.00006771317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977069,0.00018303648,0.00026789887,0.00044971396,0.00048861123,0.00090387475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984542,0.0003671489,0.0001275325,0.00019500697,0.00022009977,0.00063599006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016473364,0.00011992319,0.00031401636,0.00005345771,0.0009347583,0.00014592962,0.00040297856,0.000025477917,0.00017149298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003267032,0.00009349775,0.000041828505,0.0014937643,0.009853764,0.00074975326,0.00015533742,0.00008896779,0.00016450445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002035674,0.000033901728,0.08620975,0.00007741119,0.0000149428415,0.0000014188366,0.0031444388,2.356434e-9,0.000030978597,0.5356639,0.0017784362,0.37304276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012902473,0.00016578386,0.771845,0.0022693658,0.00007563346,0.000004648224,0.011464264,0.0000106631005,0.00006606524,0.021587286,0.19172752,0.00065473566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011708988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025063532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68563527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024861313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006472678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767591425","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000442","title":"Democratic Citizenship and Denationalization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Law; Law and economics; Terrorism; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.09744153784587155,"score_gpt":0.3641687994074506,"score_spread":0.26672726156157905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767591425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034101404,0.008602835,0.00070694304,0.17497808,0.00067793124,0.0008574715,0.000035489866,0.00014715875,0.7798927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113137,0.0020818796,0.00014056504,0.005320217,0.00021272355,0.000013400564,0.000003420962,0.0000049012815,0.0010915233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989217,0.000040481762,0.00017964894,0.00021746552,0.00030082942,0.00033987992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990083,0.000106121995,0.00014752094,0.00029873403,0.00021796962,0.0002213368],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007630437,0.00007369405,0.0001611923,0.000037784917,0.0013999146,0.00038466536,0.0002898109,0.000009385213,0.00018945572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022151212,0.00005760396,0.00002685737,0.000045438162,0.0067376224,0.00029257138,0.00005481797,0.00007118294,0.000068267174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6388665e-7,0.0000053464096,0.00026975176,0.00015291985,0.000001615757,3.1986812e-7,0.00020576385,1.3317692e-8,0.000006810747,0.9847791,0.00081631483,0.013761778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022712947,0.00014105283,0.06682025,0.0025144399,0.00021175179,0.00002723173,0.0015464594,0.00060714944,0.000100695026,0.79210067,0.1349834,0.0007197473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003654688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067954505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95702994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047499536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012200891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779364895","doi":"10.1017/s0003055417000569","title":"Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":251,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Status quo bias; Politics; Personality; Status quo; Discounting; Work (physics); Appeal; Regret; Subject (documents); Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.10032325166488373,"score_gpt":0.529907989688136,"score_spread":0.42958473802325225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779364895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98558044,0.00018183608,0.000036556325,0.0018783394,0.00011586002,0.00089920935,0.0000069060293,0.000013538552,0.01128729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933237,0.000029654313,0.00012646102,0.0003594862,0.00008056714,0.000035415167,2.0139127e-7,0.000006804278,0.000029071472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961251,0.0008992601,0.00055986334,0.0003722577,0.0011727993,0.00087071455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997394,0.000415753,0.0005816254,0.00089287345,0.00037389164,0.00034183165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015802722,0.00012100212,0.00046450115,0.00005311251,0.0011284517,0.00008244597,0.0012946706,0.000022025743,0.00006601519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058232397,0.0000813696,0.00010331665,0.0007334727,0.0071630212,0.0005054931,0.00022350485,0.00011168035,0.0000043906325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026835272,0.0016659442,0.18302798,0.00011205357,0.00002346413,0.0000028161255,0.0112429885,0.0000013199001,0.0023925204,0.7885038,0.00007180402,0.012928422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325223,0.0019255711,0.9100647,0.0023226377,0.00013301277,0.0000029106384,0.06378818,0.00006498083,0.006638729,0.013996707,0.00024474695,0.00038531906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08893482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032107588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77450716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022013254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047769674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793309941","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400500537","title":"Open States in the Global Economy: The Political Economy of Small-State Macroeconomic Management. By Jonathon Moses. New York: St. Martin's, 2000. 259p. $69.95.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Economics; Economy; Politics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.020803169247194,"score_gpt":0.27208077602021485,"score_spread":0.25127760677302086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793309941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052362204,0.022434903,0.00045182562,0.2441988,0.00032060835,0.0036563121,0.00021341883,0.00007915145,0.67628276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6733209,0.010543963,0.0004089987,0.31396854,0.0005470593,0.00023492194,0.00006307912,0.00005133419,0.0008611882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660915,0.00005725952,0.0007983389,0.0006553098,0.00021018907,0.0016697648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848694,0.00013038091,0.00046963742,0.0006797441,0.000079326186,0.00015398288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014859065,0.0003068621,0.00062880997,0.00005621811,0.00020747632,0.00064391404,0.0029371385,0.00002462045,0.0002256811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016485505,0.00020366037,0.00013798635,0.0014956865,0.0018808931,0.0011056283,0.00083233166,0.00017371417,0.00022612466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012351872,0.00006920796,0.0064756772,0.00021191643,0.000009597028,0.000013120098,0.000015674252,0.000001321004,3.1242507e-7,0.92623276,0.0333507,0.033607394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030579965,0.000027882375,0.012292852,0.0002817296,0.00005858928,0.000010690515,0.0006058929,0.00022785719,0.0000020668413,0.21175481,0.7741285,0.00030331136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023732675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004922897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7407778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042039086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032351306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98276836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795668280","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000151","title":"Can Social Contact Reduce Prejudice and Discrimination? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; United States Institute of Peace","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Contact hypothesis; Social psychology; Psychology; Social contact; Contact theory; Intervention (counseling); Cognitive dissonance; Observational study; Class (philosophy); Homogeneous; Constructive; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06263205100054903,"score_gpt":0.46191299556883025,"score_spread":0.3992809445682812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795668280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.789979,0.0049223877,0.0000413853,0.17449096,0.00042020084,0.00052563247,0.000006996595,0.000045415673,0.029568039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98393464,0.004217838,0.00014282741,0.011146821,0.0004549821,0.00005037811,5.216384e-7,0.000004362844,0.000047642938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976956,0.0003452897,0.00027884037,0.0004451837,0.0004288494,0.0008062393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883246,0.00042861787,0.00010095072,0.00014835075,0.00012258448,0.00036702608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055467,0.000108799664,0.00032140317,0.000052698717,0.00048764583,0.000073850344,0.00044206498,0.000038702794,0.0003549221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026457498,0.00009450171,0.00004746947,0.0008538647,0.004841681,0.00028744288,0.00010174832,0.00012290261,0.000029110332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045647936,0.00022444132,0.020242069,0.00010304083,0.000016758127,0.0000109265675,0.07016907,1.8354226e-9,0.0063379654,0.6388064,0.0053015323,0.25874212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075832184,0.002490077,0.74964964,0.008822668,0.0001265241,0.000009914491,0.094613075,0.000017583638,0.004033467,0.06922771,0.06853314,0.0017178907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080950126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72940755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034136552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038021215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804147862","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000199","title":"Independent Candidates and Political Representation in India","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Representation (politics); Voter turnout; Politics; Percentage point; Government (linguistics); Ethnic group; Proportional representation; Demographic economics; Exploit; Contingent vote; General election; Standard deviation; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Voting; Statistics; Group voting ticket; Democracy; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security; Finance","score_opus":0.04011006995609783,"score_gpt":0.4356902913486197,"score_spread":0.39558022139252186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804147862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79669935,0.0010812933,0.00006276089,0.061119586,0.00023928839,0.0009809645,0.0000096696995,0.000087845314,0.13971923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947325,0.0002990175,0.0000850195,0.0044995914,0.00026892804,0.000031334013,0.0000012447271,0.0000053831313,0.000076985736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966087,0.0003699385,0.00036564746,0.00038192366,0.0006509916,0.0016227957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981588,0.00027085323,0.00007387623,0.00018778701,0.00016043447,0.0011482462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017791297,0.00010554677,0.0003035286,0.000117943455,0.0003263374,0.00009541439,0.00023691826,0.000036106438,0.00013913194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027135515,0.0000889933,0.000034043325,0.0015679259,0.0064104595,0.00032283517,0.00007243524,0.00012832721,0.000119356744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016593348,0.000020407015,0.0959184,0.00003407116,0.0000011419153,0.000001997446,0.00015520366,3.5868626e-9,0.000034957637,0.89862555,0.00007714557,0.00512945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018562422,0.00028605628,0.91745096,0.0008161503,0.0000329008,0.000010273781,0.0010834157,0.000051703675,0.00034663067,0.06565397,0.013705383,0.00037690357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092811145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040074247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8329716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046963056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000531937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99629354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888626241","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400400559","title":"Between the State and Islam. Edited by Charles E. Butterworth and I. William Zartman. Washington, DC, and Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press, 2001. 256p. $49.95 cloth, $18.95 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Islam; Center (category theory); Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.018380252659425174,"score_gpt":0.2868876969293539,"score_spread":0.26850744426992873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888626241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7472769,0.10620358,0.00018107682,0.06331167,0.0002920039,0.0021327364,0.0020848312,0.00015799441,0.07835919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6424623,0.3509588,0.00007166345,0.004543315,0.00022469752,0.000006694737,0.00001355298,0.000011519887,0.0017074406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965708,0.00041917426,0.0003253116,0.000662277,0.0006317571,0.0013906305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997679,0.0005366748,0.00020119466,0.00027532558,0.0001430652,0.00116476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011010069,0.00028604193,0.00054670963,0.000031370564,0.0012414906,0.00025214016,0.00043019478,0.000049553673,0.000016000991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040321084,0.00021774406,0.000052327712,0.0005141389,0.017924517,0.0007705125,0.00031031543,0.0002739477,0.00000395201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025101801,0.00012585663,0.08376951,0.00045644678,0.000083212995,0.00004235413,0.0005814208,2.287356e-7,0.00005215249,0.75534344,0.11172635,0.047793943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018993574,0.00009161925,0.03106408,0.00033767254,0.00010285328,0.00003432637,0.0004411724,0.000013476787,0.0000071202103,0.00005825679,0.96732926,0.00033022126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036135808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024240954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8556029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014450564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041215293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891564017","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000527","title":"The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Democracy; Writ; Elite; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.06261548645886392,"score_gpt":0.4068541026422285,"score_spread":0.3442386161833646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891564017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009956369,0.006011977,0.00004480654,0.73125243,0.0004610236,0.0005911469,0.000005692075,0.000045079516,0.25163144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97947305,0.006715727,0.00014656661,0.01333484,0.00021976029,0.000012436946,2.8933275e-8,0.000005840035,0.00009174998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667144,0.00038808418,0.00033802583,0.00030821114,0.00096995983,0.0013242522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972449,0.0009554929,0.000108953274,0.0005944753,0.0003500284,0.0007461319],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037981058,0.000114417235,0.00026791712,0.000028219732,0.0016759302,0.000049432827,0.00160695,0.000031152096,0.000035504283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010875641,0.00006111372,0.00012362395,0.0013116592,0.02155051,0.0001463628,0.0002352327,0.00021461098,0.00012472615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011033131,0.000014509202,0.000067765446,0.000041629275,0.000002538371,2.1508131e-7,0.0008761703,2.2993644e-8,0.00003606799,0.9819861,0.00005910305,0.016914783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090559486,0.00034882146,0.028950874,0.0028294371,0.0000643928,0.000007748818,0.006309921,0.000009541192,0.00048443425,0.46171013,0.49870378,0.00049035205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018496894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000464877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021712852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007185112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913465623","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000886","title":"“Judge Lynch” in the Court of Public Opinion: Publicity and the De-legitimation of Lynching","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Newspaper; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Legitimation; Political science; Public opinion; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Advertising; History; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.0417557988375189,"score_gpt":0.39030323400858097,"score_spread":0.34854743517106207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913465623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.583288,0.0078023365,0.00027984337,0.25894338,0.00025867982,0.0020192696,0.000012323364,0.000023217235,0.1473729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852205,0.00744168,0.0001586573,0.007095664,0.000053740863,0.000019533922,5.7586675e-7,0.0000021099809,0.0000075716457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972359,0.00079930824,0.00037008544,0.00015847897,0.00074074825,0.0006954605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768865,0.0014259515,0.00021094302,0.00028929568,0.00016623299,0.00021894582],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010838198,0.000071846895,0.00032698695,0.000066848785,0.00016279446,0.0000669374,0.000744717,0.000021552334,0.00006821218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057659005,0.000039280807,0.000060000726,0.001399996,0.0082346415,0.00038279605,0.00006858434,0.00013943367,0.0000090372805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1161804e-7,0.000015752528,0.011028802,0.0001433582,0.0000013346908,9.328998e-8,0.0018942817,1.3965261e-7,0.0000045847855,0.97496915,0.00005292844,0.01188886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020820242,0.0006118398,0.35615262,0.005994085,0.00017412912,0.000060514518,0.0866893,0.0023838126,0.00016143834,0.2293778,0.31519154,0.0011208622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008741028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011367601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74559134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009268351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008398099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937055506","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402374343","title":"Globalization of Japan: Japanese Sakoku Mentality and U.S. Efforts to Open Japan. By Mayumi Itoh. New York: St. Martin's, 1998. 256p. $45.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; EPIC; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Political science; World economy; Subject (documents); Economic globalization; Economic history; Scale (ratio); Political economy; Economy; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03322563554346016,"score_gpt":0.33577359281930347,"score_spread":0.3025479572758433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937055506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42815188,0.075040996,0.00004782784,0.07538983,0.00085606653,0.0063549574,0.00029966398,0.00028405784,0.41357473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795779,0.004964615,0.00034532108,0.011453324,0.00013586384,0.000042290805,0.000012876242,0.000014527312,0.0034532866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960473,0.00035623155,0.0005827785,0.0007263246,0.0010942826,0.0011930836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972644,0.000081082195,0.00026623384,0.00047565284,0.00010688327,0.0018057333],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001853948,0.0002507696,0.0007012613,0.00005281433,0.0007183908,0.00018167582,0.0012757919,0.00006810926,0.0009992153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008998611,0.00020845489,0.000105125066,0.0023319535,0.0037730671,0.0006287815,0.00033946193,0.00014004277,0.00013106866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027215963,0.00065548206,0.00925496,0.0008384576,0.000043414126,0.0000048748534,0.018545015,8.903291e-7,0.0007865579,0.39418072,0.4139685,0.1616939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018721574,0.0002136488,0.0016124645,0.00075719185,0.000083088285,0.00001189088,0.005536589,0.00001192347,0.000052111398,0.0008646739,0.9902161,0.00045310747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041772526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010130764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5762476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053510204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028467088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944160600","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402240472","title":"Global Limits: Immanuel Kant, International Relations, and a Critique of World Politics. By Mark F. N. Franke. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2001. 265p. $59.50 cloth, $19.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020860455098622787,"score_gpt":0.3079925515645295,"score_spread":0.2871320964659067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944160600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03870515,0.3061566,0.0013844039,0.17154136,0.00054762437,0.0020057054,0.00229483,0.00021351539,0.47715077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70439607,0.27733424,0.0027940643,0.00818623,0.00012291172,0.000002803739,0.000018580175,0.000013789901,0.0071313167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734163,0.00022877716,0.0003974233,0.00038661712,0.00076716015,0.00087837834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980813,0.0002528419,0.00024079985,0.0002496922,0.00022248132,0.0009528288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073588645,0.000156882,0.00043515855,0.00005048302,0.00029296117,0.00005123965,0.0007410649,0.000043586173,0.0005375332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001252007,0.00016092438,0.00011410479,0.0011829514,0.004776775,0.00045223997,0.0001245011,0.00014282683,0.000021190082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068173913,0.00015936923,0.009527093,0.00015823453,0.000025825302,0.0000050000617,0.00057909574,0.0000015972659,0.000008706242,0.644701,0.33257636,0.012250897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019024848,0.00007050534,0.0063174507,0.0006346101,0.000070375,0.0000040986783,0.0012415068,0.00019108511,0.0000021067021,0.011151076,0.9798834,0.00024357236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14584301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005246673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6656909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039580712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005065769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944179347","doi":"10.1017/s0003055400400572","title":"The Politics of Pragmatism: Women, Representation, and Constitutionalism in Canada. By Alexandra Dobrowolsky. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, 2000. 320p. $24.75 paper.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Representation (politics); Pragmatism; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.014677506223990775,"score_gpt":0.27515452127969314,"score_spread":0.26047701505570237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944179347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44626573,0.07799409,0.00008617091,0.12815954,0.0006174512,0.0018555115,0.00027003305,0.000055061613,0.34469643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90324867,0.093159914,0.000043412954,0.0026253082,0.000032994183,0.000010691638,0.0000026089472,0.0000020468062,0.00087433256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767995,0.00019071766,0.00030907724,0.00026971445,0.00071013963,0.000840421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986107,0.0005222475,0.00013936606,0.00014962844,0.00016980343,0.00040827383],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075134577,0.00010892844,0.00030997695,0.000024644203,0.0011369669,0.00003354245,0.0003671099,0.00001859769,0.000067566914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011467078,0.00008406128,0.00003280752,0.0008791232,0.010654527,0.00027313756,0.00010997749,0.00012181901,7.685501e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004121207,0.000021543976,0.035319418,0.00001676328,0.0000087471835,0.000007702741,0.00030926047,3.9613994e-7,0.0000028001502,0.957831,0.00322743,0.0032508126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009838666,0.000018805893,0.047126025,0.00021402312,0.000017908162,0.000007819361,0.0046551614,0.0000016112897,0.0000027926185,0.0065368954,0.941192,0.00012857623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99612015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9683514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9512941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002606982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008021205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944759311","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402390476","title":"Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post–Cold War Era. By J. Ann Tickner. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001. 262p. $45.00 cloth, $17.50 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Politics; State (computer science); International relations; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Cold war; Gender studies; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.0829163070775253,"score_gpt":0.3164031981843397,"score_spread":0.23348689110681442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944759311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030875225,0.1616991,0.0000926067,0.217536,0.0003021216,0.0031547092,0.00012579687,0.00022726937,0.58598715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89684093,0.06681242,0.0013706303,0.0122743705,0.00041888552,0.00001801218,0.0000071642044,0.00002414951,0.02223342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960323,0.00050389156,0.0003419485,0.0005805249,0.0008388435,0.0017024776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816805,0.0002636177,0.00012866591,0.00039289537,0.000082018836,0.00096475706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001385753,0.00019029503,0.00039692706,0.000081869286,0.0009300283,0.00026518674,0.0008357754,0.00004883018,0.00026982767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044654164,0.00016849593,0.00009227984,0.0013228485,0.0038771562,0.0004531977,0.00014850027,0.00028089696,0.000022456434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020947657,0.00025639348,0.0061095823,0.00027686072,0.00002247249,0.000018073377,0.005192892,0.0000024995152,0.000053977994,0.7752899,0.19521561,0.01755963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015004109,0.00006456658,0.007458141,0.0002259122,0.00005736286,0.0000086944865,0.011124174,0.00011934474,0.000012421247,0.0016965036,0.97874695,0.00033586507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2752449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005238232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8659657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039031322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037800087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970769854","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000376","title":"Investment in the Shadow of Conflict: Globalization, Capital Control, and State Repression","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Economic system; Capital (architecture); Globalization; Market economy; Expropriation; Collective action; Capital accumulation; Harm; Shadow (psychology); Investment (military); Political economy; Politics; Political science; Human capital","score_opus":0.014372989566235034,"score_gpt":0.34511401684477067,"score_spread":0.3307410272785356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970769854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6715568,0.015386122,0.000072792216,0.050794262,0.00014811654,0.0018898712,0.00005477053,0.00003572661,0.2600616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732489,0.005587512,0.000032925942,0.020979786,0.00001898047,0.000012341464,4.7690946e-7,0.0000025338181,0.00011651788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977101,0.0002909944,0.00030582017,0.00025877528,0.00071397977,0.0007202956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885976,0.0003152526,0.00013778148,0.0002532621,0.00010895218,0.0003249767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020428204,0.000087476794,0.00030548964,0.000030515132,0.000113192305,0.000043230997,0.00044921017,0.000016041226,0.0000490244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016063115,0.00005582502,0.000040197872,0.00084876275,0.004010429,0.00021404907,0.00005625907,0.000085083426,0.000021788775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016868739,0.000020841942,0.011393169,0.00006298193,0.0000012298863,8.4188224e-7,0.00077153,1.5878985e-7,0.000032787142,0.98539543,0.00006441402,0.0022549042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007639397,0.00036642738,0.60888314,0.0024009917,0.000059883285,0.000007932935,0.004215474,0.00016271263,0.000090792164,0.07080092,0.31172994,0.00051786174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028653387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029751187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91459453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012548009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038202055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997690757","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000790","title":"Independent Agencies, Distribution, and Legitimacy: The Case of Central Banks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Discretion; Credibility; Constraint (computer-aided design); Delegation; Monetary policy; Distributive property; Economics; Central bank; Distribution (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Business; Monetary economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01799498230365653,"score_gpt":0.26810461811089126,"score_spread":0.2501096358072347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997690757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97080004,0.015183873,0.0013016207,0.004948685,0.00016086553,0.00066524907,0.00020181503,0.000019734047,0.006718098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767524,0.0015052002,0.00012043327,0.00062968314,0.000019724179,0.000009134268,0.000003762852,0.000004963011,0.00003187648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982334,0.000038506892,0.00053688086,0.00041738615,0.00009761052,0.0006762326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988115,0.00013949694,0.0002682812,0.000490974,0.000077850666,0.00021193412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016919441,0.00010733912,0.00039144544,0.000043254848,0.00015164136,0.000043588912,0.00031768926,0.000018647543,0.00024180835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080902816,0.00008229909,0.00007638198,0.00097026903,0.0025734466,0.0001856754,0.00013014178,0.00010896438,0.00005769895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.0054774e-7,0.000024226136,0.041463986,0.00013958773,0.0000028062473,0.00000233929,0.000049470724,0.0000015200926,0.0000022723098,0.9494657,0.000040654784,0.008806935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020269914,0.00018006898,0.9217243,0.00029938525,0.000029621462,0.00041522368,0.0002965477,0.0022280803,0.000041583717,0.043015998,0.031157365,0.0004090895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026230444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026466148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029495184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001628081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9481971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002992174","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000789","title":"Social Network Structures and the Politics of Public Goods Provision: Evidence from the Philippines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Politics; Clan; Incentive; Elite; Fractionalization; Competition (biology); Scale (ratio); Public economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Market economy; Microeconomics; Geography; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.07718946976691776,"score_gpt":0.38100215808743454,"score_spread":0.3038126883205168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002992174","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04111804,0.10475849,0.00010313724,0.8485778,0.00018006317,0.0009160916,0.000014130808,0.000059020193,0.0042732004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95096534,0.021620512,0.000111717665,0.025114724,0.0021515433,0.000016782842,6.8538566e-7,0.0000057378484,0.000012937504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964767,0.0009377987,0.00035154133,0.00032674876,0.0009232185,0.000983959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966265,0.002256033,0.00021854758,0.0001918128,0.00017872767,0.0005284028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025458396,0.00013576951,0.0004664667,0.000008705103,0.001818494,0.00016081125,0.0010849703,0.000035560817,0.000080521495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007125973,0.00006850798,0.00013991937,0.001869317,0.023167964,0.00025999066,0.00031238422,0.00022874317,0.0000055361297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003912995,0.0000045337924,0.0011989202,0.00003547321,0.000007809101,3.5185366e-7,0.0041647335,1.1001534e-7,0.0000016451772,0.9444538,0.0019471593,0.048181605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056476396,0.00032367985,0.081417516,0.0016200915,0.0004573626,0.0000042110987,0.03146348,0.0002297181,0.000014332597,0.6528976,0.230189,0.0008182629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073066023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016355912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066647306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006696394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004654961","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000807","title":"When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":302,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Operationalization; Conceptualization; Phenomenon; Democracy; Populism; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09085768465067101,"score_gpt":0.3497723236653853,"score_spread":0.2589146390147143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004654961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61736274,0.009768542,0.000047020745,0.36497864,0.00013513681,0.0021447798,0.000109619745,0.000033481218,0.0054200534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731467,0.0008854245,0.000049907278,0.025853079,0.000032373537,0.000011867444,2.6246826e-7,0.0000043528626,0.000016040916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976145,0.00042916983,0.00027419464,0.0002455426,0.0010626542,0.0003739657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897784,0.00024290652,0.00019253338,0.0001941606,0.00018790383,0.00020467442],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001804463,0.00010445133,0.0002450627,0.000013381295,0.00045848588,0.000039171722,0.0003782883,0.000014457496,0.000087333574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014249939,0.000044955887,0.0000413171,0.00039133395,0.0086687915,0.00009456987,0.00011001687,0.00007581014,0.0000060479288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006615099,0.00003735314,0.032881398,0.00018147375,0.000029526049,4.336682e-7,0.008833303,3.0691552e-7,0.0006486404,0.9521965,0.0010864652,0.00409799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011995689,0.0011627616,0.3468781,0.00965229,0.0006157592,0.000011063593,0.030544998,0.000400344,0.013182797,0.012485339,0.58258164,0.0012853687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022593362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011771962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93971115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005365256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019208007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99402905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027489367","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000143","title":"The Electoral System, the Party System and Accountability in Parliamentary Government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Electoral system; Public administration; Multi-party system; Competition (biology); Political science; Political economy; Politics; Economics; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.040329062060317236,"score_gpt":0.3636888808233629,"score_spread":0.3233598187630457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027489367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6015465,0.012161386,0.00006271183,0.36489478,0.00037274166,0.0031031019,0.000033387307,0.00017828957,0.017647058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946937,0.00043279745,0.000010718285,0.004554263,0.00018902146,0.00010465991,2.894873e-7,0.000004847629,0.000009727149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960781,0.00084600045,0.0004597668,0.0003439086,0.0010737886,0.001198451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981356,0.000689165,0.00012587833,0.00024579553,0.00006861964,0.0007348891],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038206878,0.00012398044,0.00032266634,0.0000070559913,0.0009243283,0.0001840664,0.00050435885,0.000021002048,0.000011503387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011978243,0.00006470559,0.00005915776,0.001052238,0.003731766,0.00019249771,0.00009974886,0.00017554392,0.000035363657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007236954,0.000015709536,0.03142415,0.00042941625,0.0000043820983,0.0000017558864,0.0003671279,2.0255975e-7,0.000018801536,0.95375246,0.00032303203,0.013655713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007199473,0.001095164,0.36003006,0.0064936928,0.00036577403,0.000030728566,0.10317362,0.0034068858,0.00021529432,0.003064183,0.5196973,0.0017073585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0850794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051602162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013229789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034733038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036386626","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000258","title":"Human Rights are (Increasingly) Plural: Learning the Changing Taxonomy of Human Rights from Large-scale Text Reveals Information Effects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for Research Computing, University of Pittsburgh; York University; University of Pittsburgh; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Human rights; Plural; Political science; Taxonomy (biology); Amnesty; Computer science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013415210805946591,"score_gpt":0.2619111905815332,"score_spread":0.24849597977558663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036386626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8354214,0.0024914034,0.12027058,0.019514816,0.00043928687,0.003627078,0.000024121617,0.0009789963,0.017232325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942374,0.00002605245,0.0025147977,0.0030200751,0.0001221586,0.00004762535,0.000004488042,0.000005419509,0.000021973132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970759,0.00032542634,0.0005176034,0.00043109374,0.00066613156,0.0009838338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981585,0.00017540422,0.0004833874,0.00049076456,0.00016245381,0.0005294557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010839491,0.0002085877,0.00051043206,0.000123589,0.0014590365,0.00021270562,0.0012349846,0.000031774893,0.000029561224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028359157,0.00013690352,0.00014277203,0.0021881121,0.0007629852,0.0011021879,0.0003553894,0.00030813436,0.00013303672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009704316,0.00021052825,0.0027391165,0.0022135696,0.000079098354,0.000034937755,0.0040059015,0.000019840436,0.008438166,0.87764066,0.0019151132,0.102693334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019179807,0.0033241683,0.046021637,0.017346947,0.00047629455,0.00010067525,0.0014467997,0.020168629,0.05761739,0.03626883,0.8119869,0.0033237075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022482155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033015243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84137183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011958951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005393875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037544043","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000131","title":"Negativity Biases and Political Ideology: A Comparative Test across 17 Countries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Negativity effect; Respondent; Politics; Biology and political orientation; Social psychology; Negativity bias; Psychology; Skin conductance; Work (physics); Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.11386565345052191,"score_gpt":0.4829629239513404,"score_spread":0.3690972705008185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037544043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28992048,0.0051351506,0.00011743665,0.60673124,0.00018692618,0.0007761481,0.000115639436,0.00021464699,0.09680237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092123,0.0021879082,0.00013563786,0.08810955,0.00027110704,0.00002339052,0.0000010512771,0.000004861975,0.000054217173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996458,0.00035391893,0.0003276496,0.0005430531,0.0005030805,0.0018143214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603397,0.0018367586,0.00011512308,0.00015573006,0.0002038638,0.0016545722],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010290527,0.00017130523,0.00065024575,0.000024983143,0.00083891413,0.00011946089,0.0005103814,0.000046240148,0.00024162808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00946922,0.00013908997,0.0000850524,0.0012479479,0.030555367,0.00034670997,0.00019437344,0.00022187039,0.00016089203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005728482,0.00005675066,0.015992025,0.00005836433,0.0000067374426,0.0000070453934,0.0031435494,9.372917e-9,0.000043608892,0.973346,0.003099129,0.004241037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005271951,0.001768447,0.22370604,0.0011310206,0.00013103453,0.000044294626,0.043677755,0.00006709164,0.0001759321,0.028162811,0.69942325,0.0011851068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007150001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004886087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9451832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018100646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048337542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039444640","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000301","title":"Bridges between Wedges and Frames: Outreach and Compromise in American Political Discourse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Compromise; Politics; Normative; Political science; Stalemate; Political economy; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06642808918993534,"score_gpt":0.43013166675825826,"score_spread":0.36370357756832294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039444640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71807885,0.0016539552,0.00008254212,0.2759956,0.000030181467,0.00054836104,0.000025480915,0.0000663241,0.00351868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022484,0.00086712505,0.0001906386,0.008349682,0.00030507613,0.000029417732,0.000002387025,0.000011462195,0.000019391056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591756,0.00049223105,0.0004826651,0.0006015581,0.0006239059,0.0018820987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615836,0.0006274276,0.00011845014,0.00018056003,0.00007964025,0.0028355392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011131469,0.00020621953,0.0007746785,0.00007161627,0.00030968475,0.00014835564,0.0003215273,0.00003723057,0.00002548272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002684063,0.0001695713,0.000059409354,0.0012801941,0.012345778,0.00030474205,0.00013219993,0.00026328702,0.000030399216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025307002,0.000033097174,0.25611264,0.0001986427,0.0000043122704,0.0000044659814,0.0005003316,4.938215e-8,0.000019101395,0.7107575,0.0000816702,0.032285657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037229364,0.00080500473,0.95583004,0.0013877454,0.00015851582,0.0000072209773,0.0082779145,0.00023362861,0.00006666411,0.010862978,0.021135204,0.00086278864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06593247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008263417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69989455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024023688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035121388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094506402","doi":"10.1017/s0003055420000854","title":"Reconciling the Theoretical and Empirical Study of International Norms: A New Approach to Measurement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Norm (philosophy); Pace; Scope (computer science); Positive economics; Lesbian; Empirical research; Political science; Sociology; Econometrics; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.16853042756360168,"score_gpt":0.436788907835957,"score_spread":0.2682584802723553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094506402","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25474578,0.0018796774,0.0044969786,0.561623,0.0002593533,0.0030791466,0.0000066146504,0.00006515597,0.1738443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913264,0.0005823903,0.00050192646,0.009607175,0.000146184,0.0000131950355,2.0148306e-7,0.0000031636719,0.000013099639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974775,0.00022794057,0.00027273232,0.0003183307,0.0012514074,0.0004520941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986034,0.000098306635,0.00006425482,0.00015080765,0.00021750104,0.0008657506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021705194,0.000074036034,0.00021544789,0.000029296249,0.00021352647,0.000064473934,0.0005281393,0.0000109791235,0.000053211996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035724419,0.00004525637,0.000041795854,0.0008062307,0.0022022156,0.000074954354,0.00015801465,0.000096505086,0.00001303279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062426666,0.00020088212,0.008523219,0.000055108907,0.000019892497,7.373992e-7,0.019237673,0.0000030070657,0.000026899366,0.94058144,0.001382867,0.029962044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021179763,0.0033054233,0.20449118,0.0013526434,0.00083851663,0.000035856014,0.42529905,0.0033768238,0.00023755207,0.06453176,0.2924229,0.0019903176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031059314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039396353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8760497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012229108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061928923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8114155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125285252","doi":"10.1017/s0003055407070268","title":"Federalism, Liberalism, and the Separation of Loyalties","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Political science; Loyalty; Liberalism; Dual federalism; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Tiebout model; Political economy; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.018717840428065836,"score_gpt":0.39028078143205797,"score_spread":0.3715629410039921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125285252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12415959,0.031914305,0.0012966482,0.17666255,0.00039683483,0.0016439774,0.000019185329,0.00009894926,0.663808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856459,0.004719005,0.0001824824,0.008544133,0.0001344578,0.000008135943,1.9738339e-7,0.0000034650188,0.00076226203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976339,0.00021163435,0.0003635972,0.00020028453,0.0007114728,0.0008791292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838525,0.00065164384,0.00017071253,0.00018356481,0.000142618,0.00046621647],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055253417,0.0000835434,0.00034496674,0.000026221784,0.0004429341,0.00006267758,0.00032973022,0.000019164534,0.000026197144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021344572,0.00004957701,0.0000699875,0.0007647888,0.014202609,0.00020940846,0.00006334748,0.000084016785,0.0000115747225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003279312,0.0000074901113,0.0003850499,0.00005955138,0.0000017383742,4.6876025e-7,0.00028936667,1.799996e-8,0.0000061065643,0.9847009,0.00020505274,0.014340932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004357165,0.000098001976,0.041331686,0.0011846782,0.00006301978,0.000012509815,0.0016581648,0.000022927996,0.00018314688,0.038706847,0.91597193,0.0003313916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06321018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009975297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012587721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028617415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98848015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125598908","doi":"10.1017/s0003055419000698","title":"Can Economic Assistance Shape Combatant Support in Wartime? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research; Princeton University; Yale University; United States Institute of Peace; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Combatant; Livelihood; Cash; Psychological intervention; Cash transfers; Government (linguistics); Competence (human resources); Economic growth; Economics; Business; Political science; Finance; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.028578616464115632,"score_gpt":0.37575028468914884,"score_spread":0.3471716682250332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125598908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84288263,0.0033907804,0.0000067469678,0.04236792,0.00061169115,0.00079584995,0.00004583456,0.00006468461,0.10983387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273646,0.0023594943,0.00036527187,0.0038735743,0.00007136414,0.000027383916,0.0000047809854,0.000007044927,0.0005546064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725574,0.00013590096,0.00040350866,0.0005141502,0.0007138453,0.0009768285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988704,0.00025250448,0.0001327799,0.00023143958,0.000059641334,0.00045324146],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013694292,0.00014030545,0.0003619385,0.000071848044,0.00018233137,0.00011304423,0.0008490322,0.000021013935,0.0047904407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035764163,0.0001273208,0.00007113874,0.0005311705,0.0018199148,0.0005321221,0.0001254985,0.00011848889,0.0011325722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009844059,0.00007371527,0.049433347,0.000041500694,0.000006574385,0.000015234447,0.0009727124,3.3978776e-7,0.0010599089,0.9412575,0.0006676922,0.006461657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012141091,0.0009846737,0.5934304,0.01499675,0.00008360388,0.000017363765,0.016497787,0.001108027,0.010115725,0.02735586,0.33042175,0.0037739468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018143613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016973834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017410588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016113234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138544629","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000022","title":"Gone For Good: Deindustrialization, White Voter Backlash, and US Presidential Voting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Deindustrialization; Voting; White (mutation); Politics; Presidential election; Presidential system; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Economy","score_opus":0.0499160684999227,"score_gpt":0.40280328893155415,"score_spread":0.35288722043163145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138544629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38441,0.016079577,0.027748,0.4922356,0.002084763,0.006355833,0.0001417586,0.00048183676,0.07046263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388605,0.0005482461,0.0006649116,0.0035284054,0.0005341303,0.000050175462,0.0000050010294,0.000008671477,0.0007743967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973252,0.0003334797,0.0003918635,0.0003878352,0.0004310897,0.0011305684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982147,0.00031199263,0.00011969373,0.00015133046,0.0004188371,0.0007834054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015875616,0.00011018623,0.000336586,0.000035572117,0.0005928414,0.00020302276,0.0001812709,0.000041969066,0.00015598658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039547845,0.00009772412,0.00007369605,0.0010891265,0.0017443702,0.0003051464,0.00006302378,0.000084654355,0.000023938337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016184323,0.000024870325,0.019717678,0.00018183739,0.0000053166027,0.000001356559,0.000083708685,3.6108756e-7,0.00011465289,0.9677661,0.00061630114,0.011486217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010523254,0.0005362725,0.12208072,0.0043312367,0.00060865056,0.00003778735,0.0010968628,0.0006199122,0.0019765105,0.04851319,0.817493,0.0016535064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073349164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001755502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018400313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000819097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152852493","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000137","title":"Whose News? Class-Biased Economic Reporting in the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic welfare; Inequality; Yield (engineering); Economics; Welfare; Economic inequality; Media bias; Distribution (mathematics); Tone (literature); State (computer science); Income distribution; Accountability; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.0745070153776287,"score_gpt":0.4409771131478305,"score_spread":0.3664700977702018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152852493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72564375,0.002790933,0.000017839198,0.20262852,0.00029823525,0.0005422839,0.00001451989,0.000060803068,0.06800312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8777859,0.024554448,0.0002666026,0.09690952,0.0002705667,0.000042402888,0.0000150705455,0.0000082400675,0.00014719706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959816,0.00062997645,0.00090495497,0.00038015645,0.0006235109,0.0014798176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724615,0.0010326313,0.00046094944,0.0004825126,0.00016182849,0.0006159268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005441263,0.0001249122,0.00039355896,0.0000961046,0.00041556254,0.00018494228,0.0007030096,0.000027746006,0.00025597657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012132905,0.000090288006,0.000105000225,0.0024476424,0.0041642347,0.0002665228,0.00007502188,0.0002414811,0.00017973692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.639599e-7,0.00004214411,0.012418531,0.00009943479,0.0000031131797,0.00009037709,0.0020197693,0.000005173357,0.00000999389,0.9676716,0.0016582633,0.015980959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097483025,0.000052382118,0.009098654,0.00094046135,0.00004178935,0.0000346304,0.027751554,0.00013800811,0.000075888034,0.017293254,0.9441301,0.0003457877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047276236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029575764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004692253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026659353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155318470","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000198","title":"Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Normative; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Inequality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.030654754532410056,"score_gpt":0.3456204243549922,"score_spread":0.3149656698225821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155318470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014323825,0.019726852,0.000027115151,0.5601658,0.000289861,0.00038330507,0.000030565963,0.000037160757,0.4050155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96343756,0.00923456,0.0002117207,0.026726186,0.00010011565,0.000007989827,9.290491e-7,0.0000050872627,0.00027586328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967893,0.0005657779,0.00035717507,0.000332569,0.0009205868,0.0010346439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974754,0.0010018988,0.00009975752,0.00031829905,0.00036785516,0.0007368009],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028101238,0.00012464987,0.00047253483,0.00002676702,0.0009286394,0.00011126002,0.00046172415,0.000038990238,0.00016720794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048873443,0.00008598031,0.0002061006,0.00090028567,0.026081668,0.00022214766,0.00015836756,0.00023788775,0.000016454147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003093415,0.000025977548,0.0001576532,0.0001117773,0.000010173719,0.0000044738185,0.0010007467,1.9115214e-8,0.0000029646592,0.9973394,0.00019655548,0.0011471286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073732797,0.00018649029,0.0025436715,0.0020923899,0.0003908162,0.00008694502,0.0355634,0.000022975479,0.00006605019,0.7022938,0.25534418,0.0006719482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01512554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031886285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020629299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014115412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99143285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167481417","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000472","title":"Jeremy Bentham: Pauperism, Colonialism, and Imperialism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Opposition (politics); Indigenous; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Indirect rule; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics","score_opus":0.030311144456776785,"score_gpt":0.37733644353244655,"score_spread":0.34702529907566976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167481417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5997583,0.04638738,0.00010245101,0.21887462,0.002093901,0.0014718206,0.00008490389,0.00042988613,0.13079672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450999,0.03753979,0.00065476523,0.015349418,0.0002820485,0.000020287223,0.0000022609324,0.000008562108,0.0010429802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717134,0.00035503792,0.0002639933,0.00045984794,0.00063535146,0.0011143998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982542,0.00014698958,0.00008523331,0.0002589531,0.00018842668,0.0010662326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015922262,0.00012882428,0.0003938123,0.000023479044,0.0010115673,0.0000907596,0.00033705053,0.000044342232,0.0006540744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016434442,0.00011861034,0.0001106004,0.0012378203,0.00917706,0.00029966084,0.00011687077,0.00015925983,0.000058465084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.717647e-7,0.00003668849,0.0011064073,0.00010764376,0.000005773787,0.000026047219,0.0021074202,1.4692778e-8,0.00019615266,0.9822789,0.004794906,0.009339111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008160564,0.000044273656,0.0049591046,0.00029541546,0.000052524287,0.000021759935,0.0046975184,9.5033477e-7,0.00010163013,0.0017988874,0.98766094,0.00028536585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003913623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012238721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98286605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039169998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013825177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99351937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173795390","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000502","title":"Reexamining the Effect of Refugees on Civil Conflict: A Global Subnational Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Impact of Light on Environment and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; American Political Science Association; Yale University","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Civil Conflict; Matching (statistics); Development economics; Spanish Civil War; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.01272647097062077,"score_gpt":0.34329740793553254,"score_spread":0.33057093696491174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173795390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8933474,0.00181613,0.00012159308,0.018014895,0.000056640252,0.0003378294,0.00002559126,0.000022273187,0.08625764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99294955,0.0008969023,0.00016045364,0.0058638463,0.000022584152,0.000010980376,0.0000039011447,0.0000034376208,0.00008832468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971402,0.00028218588,0.00031596425,0.00037564881,0.0010875451,0.0007984105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985486,0.00040826763,0.00016081576,0.0004354994,0.0000129875625,0.00043381366],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020506007,0.00013633128,0.00044027224,0.00002930882,0.00020472982,0.00002266814,0.00043239843,0.000016039236,0.0018839574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009635998,0.00007976325,0.00017162864,0.0029521605,0.002972433,0.000112504255,0.00018359548,0.00010644862,0.00018119498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015788699,0.00013624645,0.88349646,0.00018507909,0.000082164814,0.000013662551,0.00004929301,0.00003557906,0.000382626,0.060048018,0.0007010186,0.05485406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098213524,0.00041683548,0.97948897,0.00014691794,0.00025252727,0.000010366319,0.00002092472,0.000080815305,0.0006732514,0.00015327572,0.01852651,0.00013137597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046379206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060257804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09960216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005385166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009354119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196577388","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000824","title":"The Elite–Citizen Gap in International Organization Legitimacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; Universität Duisburg-Essen; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; American Political Science Association; Universiteit Maastricht; University of Toronto; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Vetenskapsrådet; Yale University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Elite; Political science; Democracy; Perception; Political economy; Democratic legitimacy; Publics; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.020403139223152643,"score_gpt":0.37584526623116354,"score_spread":0.3554421270080109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196577388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005406201,0.002959424,0.00012835118,0.38921145,0.00072077295,0.00027669655,0.000004816306,0.00005193321,0.60124034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414246,0.04411331,0.00049638504,0.01190917,0.00021946698,0.000015608473,0.000009488902,0.000006189072,0.0018057487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804395,0.00013993835,0.00024077669,0.00022115684,0.00078284816,0.0005713243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988342,0.000242372,0.00006612484,0.000115774215,0.00054905267,0.00019248799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013386523,0.00006380021,0.000121386394,0.000046344856,0.00045489566,0.0002060793,0.00059079524,0.000011369069,0.00045850678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059226174,0.000047674137,0.000033890254,0.0019693517,0.0017194588,0.0002792904,0.0001165667,0.00009969327,0.00015570468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1868555e-7,0.00001325398,0.002159477,0.000006552759,0.0000019185748,0.000005349044,0.00012460453,6.6392396e-8,0.000022355169,0.96611947,0.00054472924,0.03100193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010562446,0.000008938611,0.043297634,0.0007804745,0.000008503026,0.000011296019,0.0019836721,0.00002566818,0.00019136618,0.03518369,0.91817546,0.00022767774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001227711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031408537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046525578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014356072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7090354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204887615","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000927","title":"Benevolent Policies: Bureaucratic Politics and the International Dimensions of Social Policy Expansion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; International Development Research Centre; Fulbright Canada; McMaster University; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Technocracy; Bureaucracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Incentive; Population; Social policy; Political science; Public policy; Political economy; Public administration; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.029586460722846663,"score_gpt":0.40651658588130685,"score_spread":0.3769301251584602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204887615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057476778,0.005884443,0.000015562504,0.84128076,0.0003122267,0.0004822065,0.00003668141,0.000048793372,0.09446253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93332416,0.046665426,0.00009798061,0.018759582,0.00070996437,0.000019172861,0.0000012236544,0.0000060928805,0.0004163816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735165,0.0002875222,0.00037066973,0.00024297397,0.0008910959,0.0008561191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985128,0.00039418915,0.00016349052,0.00017974277,0.00041091844,0.00033887688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012901758,0.00012103346,0.00044849596,0.00008022149,0.0014187937,0.000060089147,0.0004376195,0.00003069904,0.000024180832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055439468,0.000067334004,0.00015236773,0.0015730617,0.016736047,0.00013420137,0.0003453776,0.00012804117,0.0000069338666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014608071,0.000029563258,0.0000907525,0.000046574696,0.000015555188,8.311333e-7,0.0031898422,4.097315e-8,0.000045612782,0.9897879,0.00037160213,0.006420311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012986113,0.00015551034,0.034432694,0.00195837,0.0005292734,0.000047604914,0.12181353,0.0000589664,0.0006866239,0.6363412,0.20167838,0.0009992472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031851348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038892863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8758474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002548463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017086728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206353349","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421001337","title":"Enfranchisement and Incarceration after the 1965 Voting Rights Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Johns Hopkins University; Harvard University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Prison; Voting; Mass incarceration; State (computer science); Politics; Voter registration; Race (biology); Political science; Power (physics); Criminology; White (mutation); Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.023242411363063847,"score_gpt":0.3692436108557238,"score_spread":0.34600119949265995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206353349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7321821,0.008203732,0.00019544738,0.18379763,0.00043421765,0.0022419584,0.000020930134,0.00012939604,0.07279458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925278,0.00011422264,0.000032979206,0.0067565655,0.00015722172,0.00018593742,7.992749e-7,0.0000033214985,0.00022119547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731,0.00060558773,0.00024231171,0.00024121313,0.00077746436,0.0008234264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990895,0.00021860897,0.000079679245,0.00014348612,0.000063042935,0.000405716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002545943,0.00007943533,0.00017440521,0.000031806747,0.0019603085,0.00009315817,0.00025264904,0.000008005954,0.0003997828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003917729,0.000052009644,0.000045063818,0.0008573361,0.0020430982,0.00017034364,0.00012352527,0.00014636248,0.000022194714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022796999,0.000020789263,0.0044332054,0.000035193523,0.0000022932536,0.0000011634876,0.00039840522,4.5617787e-7,0.000016366896,0.9809411,0.00029564963,0.013853081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013959332,0.00035380197,0.08269447,0.00035381468,0.00009861514,0.0000147438905,0.0009748204,0.00042630418,0.00003131722,0.021523917,0.8929001,0.0004884744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036672436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011957278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032478973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026342252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224274650","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422000351","title":"The Competing Influence of Policy Content and Political Cues: Cross-Border Evidence from the United States and Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Ideology; Foreign policy; Politics; Refugee; Test (biology); Prime minister; Political science; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Political economy; Public relations; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05506414671953489,"score_gpt":0.44952537483500427,"score_spread":0.39446122811546935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224274650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8861851,0.0034030962,0.0000042884285,0.10964349,0.000037415088,0.0003151199,0.000044960805,0.000011474948,0.00035502296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855307,0.002464741,0.000016770677,0.011818885,0.00007766882,0.000044110882,0.0000020902653,0.000004882126,0.00004019309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961229,0.00091087696,0.00045599777,0.00028356718,0.000991247,0.0012354403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290174,0.005635463,0.00017503336,0.00025485706,0.0003154552,0.00071742164],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002570364,0.00011705794,0.0002932031,0.000029274483,0.0021554609,0.00014834946,0.0004911432,0.000012021575,0.000034844656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01083246,0.00006940953,0.00003288531,0.0011978007,0.009365957,0.00016347817,0.00029084118,0.00020945152,0.0000010781904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004209262,0.000010500347,0.11379471,0.000051212155,0.0000064767587,0.0000010539234,0.00047067556,0.000009140391,0.000036677902,0.8836702,0.00007255161,0.0018725853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017390691,0.0003035607,0.8471887,0.0013915196,0.00008998527,0.0000144681735,0.017964382,0.00041594234,0.00006461065,0.01477064,0.11715226,0.00047003667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50206906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006019411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002438158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224307008","doi":"10.1017/s000305542200020x","title":"Intrinsic Social Incentives in State and Non-State Armed Groups","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Folke Bernadotteakademin; Sveriges Regering; University of Cambridge; York University; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Group cohesiveness; Incentive; Cohesion (chemistry); State (computer science); Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Public economics; Public relations; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025519686647621827,"score_gpt":0.28338569851527545,"score_spread":0.2578660118676536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224307008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92541385,0.03288809,0.000031201398,0.017101422,0.00019637322,0.00047984696,0.00025468308,0.000020953661,0.023613561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97403294,0.019203987,0.0000565821,0.0064527215,0.000035578934,0.00006777626,0.0000017331789,0.0000084142,0.0001402959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979229,0.000060306684,0.00051097554,0.00047086322,0.000103852624,0.0009311217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993298,0.00009985245,0.00016521713,0.00016467563,0.000023359697,0.00021709208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013792384,0.00013877542,0.0006068686,0.00020829919,0.00037519433,0.00003135479,0.00029896834,0.00000681287,0.00010018479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003337567,0.0001435573,0.00007220433,0.0014262907,0.0020569158,0.00016265865,0.00038570788,0.00019539449,0.0001013095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001783898,0.00020224102,0.11061763,0.00052885077,0.000029704172,0.000022250844,0.0034759617,0.0000015735295,0.0000049988894,0.785799,0.0016727236,0.09762722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003528993,0.00022788442,0.79592055,0.000097253695,0.000009454962,0.000010442924,0.0009968296,0.00006766699,0.0000032369276,0.10925467,0.09257912,0.00047998768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037869976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009098915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6853029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032329376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008122589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75787914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233848186","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000384","title":"PSR volume 105 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Geography; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0420395405189841,"score_gpt":0.2502171601135049,"score_spread":0.20817761959452083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233848186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043070647,0.01072776,0.00012786603,0.002939325,0.00049889705,0.0001944568,0.00009661786,0.000021732156,0.98108625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6844524,0.020106211,0.0029800844,0.034618143,0.00017747826,0.000054369244,0.0000024680005,0.000026861351,0.25758198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823487,0.000009730352,0.00039419575,0.0005570784,0.00005066058,0.0007534757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990999,0.00001955479,0.00015848268,0.00032067802,0.000027261667,0.00037410503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083174946,0.0001255036,0.0004960742,0.00008821475,0.00014606008,0.000059011894,0.00033086422,0.000014853752,0.06938736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016794904,0.00011554174,0.00007295328,0.00027827919,0.0021039618,0.0003098684,0.00020668608,0.000066108536,0.21390618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026778853,0.00009111977,0.09091507,0.0002671767,0.000033184362,0.0000046183955,0.00044100365,8.8777504e-8,0.0000012979464,0.5247083,0.37275854,0.010776968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000648915,0.000035204,0.047647208,0.00008543224,0.000012000827,0.000006312111,0.00014215006,0.000059515474,0.0000042059614,0.0035189618,0.9481975,0.00022666226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016466142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014749342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7235043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011293422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029583905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93146336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239124855","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000639","title":"PSR volume 107 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Essex; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.022148374088763596,"score_gpt":0.24453845752024037,"score_spread":0.22239008343147676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239124855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011681616,0.016092112,0.0001277427,0.021270663,0.00062448153,0.00044958174,0.00009966201,0.000030614254,0.9496235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56848747,0.016167317,0.0015881067,0.049443606,0.00020396699,0.000116897354,0.0000031139987,0.000023851177,0.36396566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981623,0.0000096836675,0.00040600845,0.0005546895,0.000057236768,0.0008100337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990478,0.000032537737,0.0001510755,0.00031499675,0.000038113718,0.0004154811],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064281566,0.00012822253,0.0005087253,0.000085299616,0.00015722781,0.0001552379,0.00031328824,0.000014953585,0.10070682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020359474,0.00011533296,0.00007018963,0.00028681356,0.0019303465,0.0004504233,0.0002097625,0.00006890956,0.44716358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5874552e-7,0.000038470702,0.039740518,0.00018115873,0.000017728937,9.783873e-7,0.000082116145,2.7690342e-7,0.0000023105902,0.1569461,0.7918335,0.011156367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057120444,0.000022648,0.043859735,0.00007891019,0.000007302267,0.0000044045933,0.00011260813,0.00019850806,0.0000018592826,0.003183833,0.9522657,0.0002074088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025716643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.2989e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58565784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013517748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027262666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90011525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241918637","doi":"10.1017/s0003055414000483","title":"The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application—ERRATUM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Politics; Action (physics); Law; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.014419678397000153,"score_gpt":0.29861810210256073,"score_spread":0.2841984237055606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241918637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001554768,0.0013804733,0.00009884096,0.0357183,0.0042642364,0.00048907555,0.0000083065,0.00003107086,0.95799416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32164875,0.009333812,0.00039172667,0.5836633,0.034894556,0.0007447587,0.0006314902,0.00012734825,0.048564304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688816,0.000038039445,0.0007607791,0.0003994508,0.0010733537,0.0008402313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831355,0.00009904887,0.00071513996,0.00029880163,0.00051948923,0.000053963075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013403929,0.00022756729,0.00047432556,0.00012067528,0.0004115754,0.00026168406,0.0013873009,0.00006176685,0.00006957464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000532735,0.00016384725,0.00016839862,0.0009956476,0.0027602015,0.0003729667,0.00032270688,0.00040509243,0.00015199903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001301878,0.000028627028,0.000043371998,0.00020886675,0.0000079772535,2.8503638e-7,0.000002406599,4.9933783e-7,8.0736794e-7,0.78485256,0.21389002,0.0009632854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005675489,0.000008409751,0.00083346764,0.00067282625,0.000032886986,0.0000011656165,0.00001846391,0.0008970134,7.175328e-7,0.0789199,0.9183877,0.00017068573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036763847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056580396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90942985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003142169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031143322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245611892","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000341","title":"PSR volume 104 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Physics; Mathematics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01880895631381177,"score_gpt":0.2529212892124167,"score_spread":0.23411233289860492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245611892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025615387,0.007116658,0.00008480526,0.016887315,0.0015491806,0.00029746612,0.00017945659,0.000033133158,0.9482366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7763686,0.00799188,0.0019182496,0.030172082,0.00028647663,0.0000405793,0.0000028256275,0.000021137237,0.18319815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982306,0.000006901923,0.00037798806,0.00057104346,0.000057448553,0.0007560193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900955,0.000033785658,0.00015120229,0.0003628759,0.000030257785,0.00041232634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009867687,0.00012572207,0.00048569313,0.0000855773,0.00017743654,0.00011654492,0.00034659798,0.000019428466,0.052853294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031513267,0.000115718176,0.00007233777,0.0002783565,0.0024395387,0.0002955935,0.00020373105,0.00013169041,0.1929122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012727904,0.0000578802,0.073295064,0.00019976826,0.000019757272,0.0000025643913,0.00010461557,1.7069176e-7,0.00001544699,0.5230314,0.39162812,0.011643965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055161778,0.000017015427,0.027350169,0.000041793122,0.00000758253,0.0000071114187,0.000049897524,0.00009536919,0.000004179492,0.001752388,0.9704375,0.00018179243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091001525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005030005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76503843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006985009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037594426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94801253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248762449","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402224338","title":"Public Health Policies and Social Inequality By Charles F. Andrain. New York: New York University Press, 1998. 292p. $50.00. The Politics of Health in Europe. By Richard Freeman. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2000. 164p. $69.95. Governing the Health Care State: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany By Michael Moran. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999. 196p. $69.95 cloth, $24.95 paper. Accidental Logics: The Dynamics of Change in the Health Care Arena in the United States, Britain, and Canada By Carolyn Hughes Tuohy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. 312p. $45.00.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Inequality; Health care; Political science; Public health; Sociology; Public administration; Media studies; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.0824474725563394,"score_gpt":0.30569390592857004,"score_spread":0.22324643337223066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248762449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69011843,0.1404856,0.000017544111,0.15703276,0.000091442336,0.005683836,0.00634365,0.000042562704,0.0001841717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74454117,0.24380682,0.0000095795285,0.011166576,0.00005309976,0.000006803591,0.00026462562,0.000023596293,0.00012771653],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876223,0.007594647,0.0009266334,0.00075885723,0.0012470972,0.0018504418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956953,0.001266184,0.0016024428,0.00072584685,0.00022415294,0.00048607995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002889323,0.0005955769,0.0012988977,0.00010478806,0.0032721579,0.00015713641,0.0023418877,0.00011177017,0.0000025633328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012980992,0.00034201643,0.00012327831,0.0031719399,0.0067427857,0.00048796245,0.0010076634,0.0010222087,8.172491e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021688681,0.0006792126,0.075681075,0.0017381274,0.00026349656,0.000011088872,0.61006755,0.000034683642,7.7582933e-7,0.019725893,0.28855854,0.0030226419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009630212,0.0003359294,0.0434816,0.0003282967,0.00007837934,0.0000036101376,0.4043192,0.00013902914,4.531783e-7,0.000023660987,0.55001545,0.00031135546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97605574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.533356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4426997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002274554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016719741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255786407","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000196","title":"PSR volume 106 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Amherst College; Georgia State University; York University; Dartmouth College; University of Rochester; Harvard University; Northwestern University; University of California, Irvine; University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Essex; University of Pennsylvania; Princeton University; Ohio State University; University of California, Los Angeles; Wellesley College; City University of New York; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Washington University in St. Louis; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Physics; Mathematics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028072915907814824,"score_gpt":0.26132204964587985,"score_spread":0.23324913373806502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255786407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008825935,0.043144535,0.00014914447,0.009200225,0.0010742206,0.0002616569,0.00014062005,0.000026915135,0.93717676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78980935,0.013520038,0.001038347,0.027172122,0.00032371908,0.000035607998,0.0000024968544,0.000017559785,0.16808079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981137,0.000011123241,0.0003678489,0.0004113091,0.000057839163,0.0010382081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898046,0.000031982527,0.00014926057,0.00028864684,0.000021319684,0.00052830845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011861915,0.00012443821,0.0004897401,0.00008098285,0.00016060474,0.00007509386,0.00025818305,0.0000148995005,0.03907303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021417651,0.000113960006,0.0000710234,0.00028333254,0.001679552,0.0004917992,0.00020379362,0.0000677465,0.24340162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.899231e-7,0.00007041052,0.1723309,0.00020765963,0.000020708496,7.024981e-7,0.00017868471,1.6359e-7,0.0000014089165,0.33847988,0.48095152,0.0077569894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046458223,0.000013630369,0.044792634,0.000056938603,0.000009612916,0.0000054585444,0.00009367469,0.00003793937,0.0000020511175,0.00064701954,0.95411944,0.00017516213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065207714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.83472e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7809834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015466234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022184193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280536100","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422000430","title":"The Effect of Pregnancy on Engagement with Politics. Toward a Model of the Political Consequences of the Earliest Stages of Parenthood","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; European University Institute; McGill University","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Politics; Childbirth; Pregnancy; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Law","score_opus":0.051468747983472694,"score_gpt":0.3715990586448643,"score_spread":0.32013031066139164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280536100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89321035,0.004613963,0.00007526135,0.06245524,0.0003414431,0.0034106297,0.00033897374,0.000021648835,0.035532475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986761,0.0007017377,0.00005316492,0.00040979704,0.000014532041,0.00006522241,3.656722e-7,0.0000060626153,0.00007296969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950915,0.0014711469,0.0005259057,0.00024688494,0.001807419,0.00085712236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749213,0.0010222703,0.00048252917,0.0005693488,0.00021248404,0.00022120943],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020386688,0.00013157717,0.00043391023,0.00004294559,0.00076830154,0.000016506752,0.0012875973,0.000015120037,0.000020394411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017732418,0.00005796135,0.00020481675,0.0010341454,0.016252851,0.00005235107,0.00036807617,0.00021002043,3.8596093e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046281616,0.000073284486,0.011003347,0.0003335101,0.000016486827,1.9104378e-7,0.00080601615,0.0000528921,0.00019272059,0.9864003,0.000017210035,0.0010994222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029916854,0.0152357165,0.17691396,0.021580022,0.0027742796,0.0000428913,0.18225129,0.0011803609,0.28312653,0.30467355,0.007031896,0.002197834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008371606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045512028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68172675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019574797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016273587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295690925","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422000193","title":"“Let Our Ballots Secure What Our Bullets Have Won”: Union Veterans and the Making of Radical Reconstruction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Suffrage; Victory; Spanish Civil War; Political science; Political economy; Law; White (mutation); Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.037764574136338394,"score_gpt":0.387470336217853,"score_spread":0.3497057620815146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295690925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19459133,0.013766857,0.00042782727,0.77996343,0.0012301684,0.00210679,0.00002954986,0.00009593229,0.007788095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302024,0.0019602873,0.00009111419,0.0046335664,0.00016172878,0.000061034818,0.0000010121136,0.000006211437,0.00006478856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583536,0.00167492,0.000428036,0.0003092744,0.00089194934,0.00086045265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990119,0.00016958297,0.00020413438,0.00020249085,0.000112989386,0.00029891948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045820866,0.00011474451,0.00041314162,0.00005978307,0.0010383233,0.00012173545,0.00037184532,0.000024145842,0.00005738803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010410149,0.000080824975,0.000102915,0.00087412674,0.0022032352,0.0003332943,0.00012327361,0.0002461609,0.000007032367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013890745,0.000043836175,0.0012835371,0.00013323785,0.000009021825,0.000002451137,0.0013353208,0.0000017215202,0.000039762745,0.8442872,0.0003654317,0.15248458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002287655,0.0017730183,0.009993479,0.0066933837,0.0005793753,0.00042603095,0.17839117,0.0014553607,0.00011159725,0.06337728,0.733222,0.0016896286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011564532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042090233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79842895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030620492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036655244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318217801","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422001459","title":"How Do Politicians Bargain? Evidence from Ultimatum Games with Legislators in Five Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vlaamse regering; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Universität Konstanz; University of Toronto; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Ultimatum game; Politics; Legislation; Democracy; Political economy; Field (mathematics); Collective bargaining; Bargaining power; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.041925520807110456,"score_gpt":0.3884494003738335,"score_spread":0.34652387956672304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318217801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71187806,0.006661327,0.00011506566,0.26465896,0.00034386662,0.0016748077,0.0000828074,0.00041092528,0.014174216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931453,0.002841329,0.000113478185,0.0030248845,0.00024591008,0.0000792259,0.0000032729308,0.000014396926,0.0005322038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947072,0.00051406684,0.00039776234,0.0006059737,0.0013411181,0.002433874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683267,0.0013109045,0.00015021145,0.00037920984,0.0002691758,0.0010578206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002183998,0.00021681293,0.00059576053,0.0001795338,0.00041141568,0.00038039926,0.0006147368,0.00004949436,0.00008647297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048646494,0.00016228139,0.00008147392,0.0040188055,0.005783541,0.0009376685,0.00007922957,0.0002118553,0.00030400968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072573766,0.000034576424,0.076399766,0.00020405561,0.000009479769,0.000031231895,0.0017992789,0.0000021967755,0.000035562047,0.9157778,0.0011920307,0.0045067617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006803156,0.0011415285,0.6712541,0.029218689,0.00030637195,0.000012114181,0.023079306,0.00063526427,0.0004665517,0.08138694,0.18907622,0.0027426004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13696027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088409465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007342085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013561236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99692214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319983953","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000011","title":"Slavery and Oratory: Frederick Douglass in the History of Rhetoric","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Appropriation; Rhetorical question; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04298511317701308,"score_gpt":0.3577840573018557,"score_spread":0.3147989441248426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319983953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04758146,0.02721732,0.000042787382,0.05478612,0.0010102685,0.0008756662,0.00002917953,0.00013299614,0.8683242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789113,0.01323779,0.000081309576,0.0069492,0.000095279676,0.000021757553,0.0000010401867,0.000003864506,0.0006984786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764234,0.0003358066,0.00026309327,0.00023163414,0.00070474856,0.0008223805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986081,0.0006525235,0.00010896226,0.00022474713,0.000098164775,0.00030749658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002564448,0.00009260253,0.0003000424,0.00010640517,0.00020279846,0.000018539506,0.00040973394,0.000018770357,0.0000478048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016238197,0.00006578379,0.000055467663,0.0024473604,0.01617718,0.0001643213,0.00007387349,0.00012277672,0.000042015978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.750771e-7,0.000013819317,0.0012613143,0.000056322882,0.0000013228354,0.0000056258114,0.0003726594,8.942234e-8,0.0000064984347,0.99111253,0.003745617,0.0034237492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034257326,0.000038213457,0.008399616,0.00018412815,0.000015303247,0.0000048298516,0.0019130894,0.0000054627544,8.7865965e-7,0.0017248362,0.98756903,0.00011033991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014564636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019659617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062371354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043032886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323363761","doi":"10.1017/s0003055422001496","title":"Evidence of Caste-Class Discrimination from a Conjoint Analysis of Law Enforcement Officers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Vanderbilt University; Humanity United; Princeton University; American Political Science Association; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Caste; Officer; Law enforcement; Discretion; Criminology; Class (philosophy); Enforcement; Institution; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.16845298505340883,"score_gpt":0.48349508995483986,"score_spread":0.31504210490143103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323363761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.640815,0.0026997111,0.00044402486,0.044228762,0.00030947928,0.0011633775,0.00023936496,0.0001506765,0.30994958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98365426,0.014592821,0.00014956266,0.0014769135,0.000027862829,0.000011912088,0.0000059676845,0.0000030063684,0.0000776852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975801,0.00026744656,0.00043412784,0.0002558513,0.0008880178,0.00057442463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977566,0.0010592139,0.00032122925,0.0002978202,0.00022275459,0.00034239213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022523026,0.00008131641,0.0004604816,0.00021049101,0.00023744788,0.000030116187,0.00041976685,0.000017606902,0.00058699684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001809695,0.000067309746,0.00018230152,0.005154435,0.0045782346,0.000384287,0.00009145948,0.00006866984,0.00006684647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002677045,0.000031032956,0.0007708017,0.00013202534,0.000054573356,4.360494e-7,0.0048862975,0.000023936374,0.0004425246,0.98154575,0.000078880046,0.01203108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005988017,0.0018515971,0.5194972,0.025050033,0.018909583,0.0000031453262,0.13118605,0.01384102,0.0015664544,0.011180053,0.2739242,0.0023918324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56133074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016729254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022459817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053023285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361273008","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000047","title":"An Outbreak of Selective Attribution: Partisanship and Blame in the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Yale University","keywords":"Attribution; Blame; Pandemic; Presidential system; Perception; Social psychology; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Competence (human resources); Democracy; Accountability; Public relations; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.17004247132674272,"score_gpt":0.4920785147171844,"score_spread":0.3220360433904417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361273008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91251296,0.0010406338,0.000099985846,0.08194082,0.000057194506,0.0008782804,0.000022269136,0.00010159924,0.0033462637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938883,0.00096168194,0.000010310203,0.004986014,0.00007238993,0.000057592195,0.0000024757107,0.000003004176,0.00001819487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970337,0.0008197604,0.00032341212,0.0002655983,0.00058599253,0.0009715075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980608,0.0008293127,0.00009210743,0.00019026079,0.000098948585,0.00072854594],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061594225,0.00008289029,0.0002869404,0.00007289242,0.0003369851,0.000043817985,0.00034844142,0.000028026216,0.000029819974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036808657,0.000056096073,0.0000396024,0.003416162,0.0042287693,0.00020452321,0.00002852207,0.00012265897,0.000027090926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016169524,0.000023021561,0.24183543,0.00009636428,0.0000012082105,0.0000015709224,0.0008647639,0.0000010901985,0.000048258877,0.7542691,0.00021085438,0.002646676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001779871,0.0004957117,0.8741615,0.00040103175,0.000060051636,0.000017361323,0.0040412843,0.00021790837,0.000039351336,0.06617424,0.053850587,0.0003630209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04670969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042469795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6880949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029823894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007378117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362470474","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000242","title":"Diversity Matters: The Election of Asian Americans to U.S. State and Federal Legislatures","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles; University of Oxford; Princeton University; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Appeal; Ethnic group; Legislature; Asian americans; Diversity (politics); Political science; State (computer science); Crossover; Representation (politics); Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03858129230010217,"score_gpt":0.38132866379506575,"score_spread":0.3427473714949636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362470474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37676358,0.0007980771,0.0005430674,0.5797917,0.00032183,0.0012326392,0.000025385478,0.00011237505,0.04041129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886094,0.0032411814,0.00009576494,0.007717322,0.000044835484,0.000008664191,5.305911e-7,0.0000031742377,0.00027912934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981871,0.00015850573,0.00015214969,0.0002252658,0.0005643989,0.0007125766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916935,0.000104422455,0.00007410513,0.00015045378,0.00010025534,0.00040139825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010327586,0.00006920579,0.00017901415,0.000067377565,0.0013952488,0.00005350783,0.00031278495,0.0000094432135,0.000019904723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041943972,0.000046951853,0.00004727435,0.0020252655,0.0032279892,0.00011654488,0.00032810163,0.00007487164,0.000031785556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009056497,0.000076717384,0.045199957,0.00037934043,0.000038428127,0.0000064226756,0.032538995,0.000007290726,0.00053003756,0.55420756,0.021919703,0.34508651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011176857,0.00026099998,0.83243144,0.00037587853,0.00006874896,0.000007688009,0.023133874,0.000047604277,0.00024317815,0.032153714,0.11075848,0.0004066025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04844961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000995562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7872315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098198005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020811798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366416469","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000199","title":"The Global Resonance of Human Rights: What Google Trends Can Tell Us","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Arizona State University","keywords":"Human rights; Appeal; Political science; Legalization; Hegemony; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.03431326730884844,"score_gpt":0.4216020625215802,"score_spread":0.3872887952127318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366416469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12291392,0.040975332,0.000002943826,0.33495274,0.0009225943,0.00083569594,0.00012538808,0.00034888342,0.4989225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537404,0.04002109,0.000029620507,0.005522671,0.0001612195,0.000020712036,0.0000035576008,0.0000041668013,0.0004965179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957961,0.00038908818,0.00042291603,0.00036633085,0.0011834066,0.001842186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794656,0.0002648526,0.00016516617,0.000409639,0.00018970417,0.001024098],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041292035,0.00012406342,0.00038204266,0.000050023435,0.0020667368,0.00021760585,0.0012464089,0.000033152104,0.000108300825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008683487,0.00008112146,0.00012231639,0.0073947595,0.009734397,0.00040489048,0.00014497673,0.00013688806,0.0000930317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.9837574e-7,0.000017830762,0.0008363119,0.00003582723,0.0000015577101,0.000001961049,0.00014286509,2.5328726e-8,4.9958237e-7,0.87979203,0.0026535087,0.11651687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034382476,0.00008582114,0.01884987,0.00042157958,0.000009837187,0.0000018703089,0.00083273137,0.0000036975653,0.000004040267,0.021986192,0.95765406,0.00011590382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11921196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01825585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060080574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091344747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367054635","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000369","title":"Fathers’ Leave Reduces Sexist Attitudes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Wien; University of Oxford; Central European University; Université de Montréal; Syracuse University","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Politics; Parental leave; Power (physics); Gender equality; Political science; Public policy; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies; Work (physics); Demography","score_opus":0.08756622586899834,"score_gpt":0.45920579204403217,"score_spread":0.3716395661750338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367054635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18797998,0.004681359,0.00009949492,0.19140765,0.00091924274,0.001305733,0.000024342262,0.0007617617,0.61282045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98462653,0.010440245,0.00018193462,0.00319933,0.0002186404,0.000026039983,0.0000025912232,0.000007863003,0.0012967977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694,0.00016889676,0.00023326186,0.00037720424,0.0008901192,0.0013905065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986191,0.00016243047,0.000079987345,0.00024063762,0.0001417972,0.00075606],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001920011,0.000102823695,0.00024510245,0.000108819666,0.00072684046,0.00012288748,0.00054740085,0.00002035405,0.00013225501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013326112,0.00008268092,0.00009509795,0.0027054765,0.0056037535,0.00020670048,0.000107006395,0.00009714018,0.00079432543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.482375e-7,0.000026915252,0.0016265431,0.00008484994,0.000005437741,0.0000056558392,0.0008840586,4.4873346e-7,0.00013848844,0.9445319,0.0028875931,0.04980772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021042395,0.00018370028,0.13452007,0.001543782,0.00012513368,0.000015648042,0.026691353,0.0000923249,0.00095059344,0.06435902,0.7701411,0.0011668208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008755116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010725611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8801729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021942292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069660076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372347658","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000291","title":"Coordinated Dis-Coordination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Essex; University of Virginia; York University; Vanderbilt University; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University; University of Michigan; Yale University","keywords":"Mobilization; Collective action; Social movement; Political science; Social mobilization; Field (mathematics); The Internet; Work (physics); Movement (music); Action (physics); Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03362023703644614,"score_gpt":0.41367445097821687,"score_spread":0.38005421394177075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372347658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026706137,0.0024472317,0.00016515872,0.3889268,0.0004670631,0.0008634215,0.00003397047,0.0009095252,0.57948065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97821563,0.005418018,0.000053985113,0.012320964,0.00017262305,0.00003685305,0.0000033239899,0.000008853061,0.0037697728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632394,0.00017409083,0.00026733606,0.00037102323,0.00094686897,0.0019167656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980334,0.00032909628,0.0000924221,0.00026720096,0.00022286618,0.0010550033],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023587074,0.000120478355,0.00030662725,0.00010350852,0.00064080954,0.000091645066,0.0006914173,0.000026210257,0.00021157633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006591041,0.00010216581,0.000095725096,0.0055304025,0.0059250602,0.0003827344,0.00011885314,0.00013225038,0.0013735011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.9108144e-7,0.000012002581,0.00039325125,0.000040720777,0.0000015034493,0.0000037225298,0.00007504141,2.6135526e-8,0.000032981305,0.94680375,0.0022187321,0.050417807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007165392,0.000050182887,0.02597605,0.00043074298,0.000023796156,0.0000018054851,0.00050161604,0.00006796287,0.000064856526,0.018654486,0.9538768,0.00028006206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011767976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014116344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95165807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041933308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072457345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377023886","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000400","title":"The Right to Hunger Strike","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Freie Universität Berlin; Università degli Studi di Genova; University of Toronto; Universiteit Utrecht; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; University College London; Northwestern University; King's College London; Brown University","keywords":"Redress; Grievance; Oppression; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Prison; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.042020982036427866,"score_gpt":0.42444360394406094,"score_spread":0.3824226219076331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377023886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029297636,0.0051627927,0.00004536359,0.6151696,0.00085888605,0.00086679973,0.0000103551365,0.00033631048,0.37462014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881089,0.037025783,0.0002261293,0.065223515,0.0008193802,0.00009612285,0.0000014715147,0.00001749262,0.008481224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629015,0.00028869053,0.00025002068,0.00035716826,0.0011407193,0.0016732563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972713,0.00096669473,0.0000628168,0.00038780435,0.00016741452,0.0011439441],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397577,0.000102686805,0.00024511412,0.00005237241,0.0018113062,0.00017718495,0.0010848964,0.000026455165,0.00015981271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060734176,0.00006224204,0.000098754026,0.003764395,0.008081611,0.00014937279,0.00014595484,0.0001980577,0.0013772767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8843e-7,0.0000055062706,0.0000722648,0.000016932529,0.0000015951917,0.0000025522309,0.0002751176,5.1373345e-8,0.000005533484,0.91585577,0.010574338,0.073189974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012654747,0.000028959845,0.0027560669,0.00014692076,0.000010388363,6.746992e-7,0.00077779475,0.000002057164,0.000011607746,0.009287179,0.98685145,0.00011423039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003856018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011777716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002148304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091584434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380610319","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000527","title":"Do Politicians Outside the United States Also Think Voters Are More Conservative than They Really Are?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Universität Konstanz; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Public opinion; Perception; Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Democracy; Phenomenon; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07307672638374667,"score_gpt":0.4176618665538056,"score_spread":0.3445851401700589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380610319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40594107,0.00059636735,0.000037312104,0.5807664,0.00027944782,0.0012510472,0.00011039254,0.0003989683,0.010619026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700653,0.0017615865,0.0000245593,0.027321992,0.0002599715,0.000078924146,0.000014303395,0.000018660912,0.00045468213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938257,0.0011802581,0.00057472463,0.00052983366,0.0013360791,0.0025534204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574196,0.0016346343,0.00035769687,0.0005392017,0.000524341,0.0012021703],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038989014,0.000252936,0.0005844547,0.00016472237,0.0013084852,0.00026069788,0.0009702075,0.000053978245,0.00005440416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050962917,0.0001603292,0.00016874715,0.0042550466,0.007496361,0.00029118787,0.0001423543,0.00029363233,0.0003722081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003754928,0.000040738058,0.03095869,0.00015800596,0.000021221864,0.000016004555,0.004087576,0.000007571051,0.00001135271,0.9578327,0.0058563007,0.0010060773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002510077,0.00030577302,0.6193599,0.004702498,0.00025409466,0.0000111159525,0.070084006,0.00062987005,0.000067072106,0.15537713,0.14774336,0.0012141947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18216138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01083829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8024556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052479096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007144371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382064905","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000606","title":"Social Capital, Institutional Rules, and Constitutional Amendment Rates","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Maryland, Baltimore County","keywords":"Constitutional amendment; Social capital; Political science; Politics; Amendment; First amendment; Democracy; Law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.055987379608976845,"score_gpt":0.40014877691334616,"score_spread":0.34416139730436934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382064905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24512462,0.023610432,0.00045765474,0.32741645,0.00079965155,0.001432794,0.0002108125,0.0006441365,0.40030342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794001,0.016336547,0.000093303395,0.003751207,0.0002896854,0.000048624188,0.000008436017,0.0000021480944,0.00006993096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974405,0.0000961808,0.00023668532,0.00034279728,0.0009146925,0.00096914545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990635,0.0001611124,0.00006497903,0.00006922277,0.0001776996,0.0004634947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012427766,0.00012177897,0.00028426372,0.00009244404,0.0030205878,0.00008190916,0.00026128435,0.000021552336,0.00009946586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009746162,0.00010278627,0.00006871302,0.0015401158,0.07837607,0.0002666023,0.00017075025,0.00010321197,0.0004316572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.618111e-7,0.00001823784,0.00075951545,0.000023835057,0.000006679397,0.0000065713994,0.00016652998,1.1364024e-7,0.000013495847,0.98847425,0.0014259662,0.009103837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020438418,0.00006980911,0.03732266,0.0006070355,0.000077163604,0.000024546029,0.004084017,0.00000969696,0.000019432322,0.2963814,0.6606362,0.0005636603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036641546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000904692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035364227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018872379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382280075","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000576","title":"The View from the Future: Aurobindo Ghose’s Anticolonial Darwinism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Darwinism; Evolutionism; Epistemology; CONTEST; Politics; Colonialism; Naturalism; Creationism; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033523283618842374,"score_gpt":0.39312660030630403,"score_spread":0.35960331668746165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382280075","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00741033,0.054372925,0.000021347147,0.8716573,0.0016442682,0.00087656354,0.000019550414,0.00022293367,0.06377478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5525091,0.415751,0.000043080337,0.029890906,0.0015155388,0.000051386614,0.0000017755638,0.000007896309,0.00022928622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960124,0.00053195574,0.00033510718,0.0004273709,0.0009984042,0.001694801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972537,0.0015834662,0.00012503772,0.0004212665,0.00012551606,0.00049099023],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002764488,0.0001562103,0.00037603837,0.00001447162,0.0060186237,0.00022591441,0.0015474813,0.00003187655,0.000403216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020336476,0.00006704816,0.000157466,0.002852185,0.022505324,0.0001499567,0.0003771855,0.00023814353,0.0009155028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001051043,0.000012107448,0.00020896635,0.0000069537205,0.0000065450486,0.0000042202337,0.00024957652,1.3296593e-8,0.0000021471546,0.77549416,0.014579896,0.20943438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032370768,0.000059490587,0.0153849805,0.0001235184,0.000027642867,7.2232007e-7,0.0058368733,0.000004181309,0.0000021850826,0.010329895,0.9680702,0.00012791502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013347915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012840714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017358878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004615532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383737845","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000539","title":"Women Also Know Stuff: Challenging the Gender Gap in Political Sophistication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Cambridge; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Sophistication; Politics; Measure (data warehouse); Simple (philosophy); Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.136754363704399,"score_gpt":0.44642777137277934,"score_spread":0.30967340766838036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383737845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2915552,0.0053204526,0.00028316263,0.5298968,0.0006858165,0.0027165061,0.000022028238,0.00061684404,0.16890322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99253595,0.0017320714,0.000020293415,0.0049690558,0.00032231482,0.00021699701,0.0000020989544,0.000011624043,0.00018962506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942972,0.00056519255,0.00050271576,0.00043789466,0.0010295834,0.0031674139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974469,0.0007444678,0.00009284177,0.000370179,0.0001644433,0.0011811974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005318699,0.00015522713,0.00038959342,0.00015510539,0.00068424764,0.00010485889,0.00061608455,0.00004201489,0.00015341667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040007937,0.000110332556,0.00007833893,0.0037320699,0.0038520894,0.00024279069,0.00010551412,0.00023092463,0.0006908057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.320069e-7,0.000033993994,0.0027970977,0.00008609731,0.0000025144989,0.000002730601,0.00059539994,5.9473774e-7,0.000012302362,0.9892058,0.00021463147,0.007048047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033412632,0.00025144115,0.30165514,0.0014723693,0.00007481401,0.000009500712,0.013919912,0.0010532846,0.000029449033,0.5061274,0.17405306,0.0010194683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012799261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049358763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7009807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001284391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070858625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386544474","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423000837","title":"Anarchy, Scarcity, Nature: Rousseau’s Stag Hunt and the Arctic Walrus Hunt Compared","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Queen's University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Queen's University Belfast; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Scarcity; Mainstream; Water scarcity; Leverage (statistics); Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Economics; Political science; Ecology; Philosophy; Law; Agriculture; Biology; Market economy","score_opus":0.041888288995344095,"score_gpt":0.44702371485286224,"score_spread":0.40513542585751816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386544474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34407035,0.034700986,0.000030150517,0.5664759,0.0014948135,0.0065360316,0.00007393516,0.00039298838,0.04622479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233332,0.036416467,0.00006721568,0.03952588,0.00015435525,0.00025667204,0.000003884031,0.000012866371,0.00022941275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459743,0.0007348701,0.000527579,0.0004788694,0.00051947817,0.0031417885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681246,0.0016625382,0.00018059868,0.00048701218,0.0002954987,0.00056186755],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049873027,0.0001827818,0.0007743746,0.00009128149,0.0048265774,0.000023382203,0.00059812074,0.000056280678,0.00015645745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025431607,0.000103610364,0.0000975773,0.0019640264,0.0061709792,0.0000802157,0.0010506732,0.00086207263,0.0006352976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031722808,0.000059380276,0.020918915,0.002444309,0.00004230084,0.000022232705,0.0045364504,5.581877e-7,0.0000061595624,0.94241047,0.007981735,0.021545768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016140736,0.00053849537,0.6423656,0.0029731586,0.00029467262,0.000052957046,0.041921996,0.00060581573,0.0000037365328,0.030499265,0.2782775,0.0008527847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03285526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003855066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9119112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058703177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008825374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99653363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387895350","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001016","title":"International Rewards for Gender Equality Reforms in Autocracies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Genève; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; York University; University College London; Uppsala Universitet; University of Cambridge; University of Cyprus","keywords":"Autocracy; Democracy; Competition (biology); Elite; Incentive; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Democracy promotion; Promotion (chess); Economics; Market economy; Democratization; Law","score_opus":0.13647359800736952,"score_gpt":0.4935937450802623,"score_spread":0.3571201470728928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387895350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04343474,0.0010172594,0.0013566854,0.23011461,0.0016356814,0.0025056764,0.000096648146,0.00042742203,0.7194113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899433,0.005205805,0.00065379567,0.0031053463,0.00018987183,0.0001133012,0.000009890657,0.0000064433098,0.0007722001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973963,0.00010754001,0.000315207,0.00032233415,0.00076418824,0.0010944399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899656,0.00017254849,0.000081965234,0.00018829916,0.00018624788,0.00037437485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003760052,0.000080789454,0.0002123426,0.0001564785,0.00030192136,0.00007693275,0.0005173282,0.00002238309,0.0000681748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024996267,0.00006290704,0.00009060434,0.0017585078,0.0020755013,0.00025740333,0.000104001636,0.00007715687,0.00007750195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.877641e-7,0.00001903813,0.0018176809,0.000088806555,0.0000028434465,0.0000010210201,0.00073938665,9.698072e-7,0.00001645209,0.9663068,0.00071360485,0.0302924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021127053,0.000055502893,0.09431169,0.00030848666,0.00002134393,0.000002719942,0.009322143,0.00043074042,0.000060799022,0.1531053,0.74180514,0.00036484282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062952996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015566382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047862885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062905217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95166516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388414526","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001119","title":"Publius’ Proleptic Constitution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Constitution; Polity; Politics; Political science; Law; Federalism; Separation of powers; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0499977275707965,"score_gpt":0.4003813273920599,"score_spread":0.3503835998212634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388414526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008563571,0.0037681514,0.00007006924,0.14288153,0.00039270165,0.00060932955,0.000009016166,0.0003495801,0.8433561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811044,0.012469567,0.00006596025,0.0059556267,0.00018663311,0.00005194031,0.0000013101002,0.0000020397033,0.00016253759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973443,0.00010546665,0.00020717744,0.00029237353,0.0008664857,0.001184162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988841,0.00014924465,0.00006026243,0.00013748293,0.00021477124,0.00055418664],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019925737,0.0000884791,0.00024265266,0.00009982397,0.0013302958,0.0000758843,0.00039670974,0.000015192906,0.00012781219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003577307,0.00007063595,0.00007426202,0.0044114483,0.017806752,0.0002275121,0.00011336193,0.00008819267,0.0015683975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.844224e-7,0.000010754713,0.0008567411,0.000020096417,0.0000024944059,0.0000034851635,0.0000467459,8.037458e-8,0.00000953689,0.96736944,0.0014244566,0.030255804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005463531,0.000044900495,0.015293453,0.0005848465,0.000039110328,0.000004828399,0.0015810862,0.000008993591,0.000008801051,0.0700343,0.912092,0.00025307498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009740481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025209438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029092273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016743375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389199525","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001247","title":"“Filling the Ranks”: Moral Risk and the Ethics of Military Recruitment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Warwick; Newcastle University; British Academy; University of Cambridge; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Government of the United Kingdom; UK Research and Innovation; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.2296922934626063,"score_gpt":0.38797267339546576,"score_spread":0.15828037993285946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389199525","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054121953,0.15501647,0.00019812329,0.72250915,0.0012711796,0.0042995787,0.000196583,0.00025505474,0.06213192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86334556,0.12896249,0.00006550509,0.007110229,0.00017418741,0.000070056696,0.0000027575816,0.000006125772,0.00026308617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819416,0.00043170125,0.00030709748,0.00020084366,0.00045653243,0.0004096496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997439,0.0018318614,0.00011237387,0.00033193946,0.00017123851,0.00011357116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068553267,0.00008555368,0.00025419402,0.00003511415,0.00087250327,0.00003247358,0.00035040308,0.000015185193,0.00006528706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028732286,0.000039530158,0.000080053964,0.00031310585,0.01794045,0.00009418629,0.00009203864,0.00037117235,0.000045219662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028307818,0.0000065710165,0.00003801945,0.0002149135,0.0000048782613,1.9111383e-7,0.007935109,9.016309e-7,0.0000015051666,0.9647092,0.00046037,0.02662549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043171507,0.00019897155,0.0050672987,0.0021304456,0.0005032601,0.000007986089,0.044598438,0.002391213,0.000051316834,0.24324782,0.70094866,0.00042286978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006125318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021499181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8092236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002874406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015206606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98473215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389704445","doi":"10.1017/s000305542300117x","title":"My History or Our History? Historical Revisionism and Entitlement to Lead","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; National Research Foundation; Universitat de Barcelona; American Political Science Association; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Lead (geology); History; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Geology","score_opus":0.1271930131596795,"score_gpt":0.424765907335008,"score_spread":0.2975728941753285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389704445","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0147826085,0.06248002,0.00060763204,0.6601765,0.006488581,0.0034871688,0.000017577971,0.00080776174,0.2511521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7892929,0.070668146,0.0026134881,0.04247531,0.0010211302,0.00019328253,0.0000060313855,0.00004455496,0.0936852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969224,0.00017745735,0.00032289207,0.00048795773,0.00095637544,0.0011329306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982364,0.00009343807,0.00009084886,0.00028669045,0.00014214456,0.0011504637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019210053,0.00012455246,0.00033091858,0.00017736136,0.00030659768,0.00003281283,0.00040542326,0.000025026216,0.0003033968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018915845,0.00009678756,0.00007634507,0.00096102525,0.0010302928,0.000148828,0.00017311455,0.00010470898,0.0005318072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026570212,0.00004839283,0.00035951476,0.00025326258,0.0000055125206,0.000019860918,0.001891869,1.4711308e-7,0.0001171338,0.45457613,0.46963182,0.07309368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040305535,0.000071571114,0.00167276,0.0001795137,0.000022402179,0.0000026347427,0.0012186434,0.000007258799,0.0000039039187,0.0006647915,0.995961,0.00015521157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014086219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016034253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77451026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072769844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014949704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99653393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391910495","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001466","title":"Late Homesteading: Native Land Dispossession through Strategic Occupation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Threatened species; Political science; Geography; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03571724620452979,"score_gpt":0.33384892345194767,"score_spread":0.29813167724741785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391910495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8865096,0.013354839,0.000041234347,0.07038727,0.0006117041,0.0007576521,0.00007515994,0.0003639302,0.02789861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805773,0.009472873,0.000058212594,0.0017455709,0.00020314845,0.00001104138,0.000015330697,9.2257625e-7,0.00043516463],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834585,0.000046811965,0.00021135577,0.0003806176,0.00037448344,0.00064086384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935293,0.00011879216,0.000048599035,0.00005936727,0.000057631652,0.00036266862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040035593,0.00013322872,0.0002425098,0.000012468832,0.00027875695,0.00017322726,0.0002688343,0.000024908662,0.00018082402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006305494,0.000022892551,0.000094521914,0.0014175607,0.0009189543,0.00040435517,0.00005901522,0.00012687112,0.00011964616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053752274,0.00009903019,0.0018943609,0.0005153969,0.000015193383,0.00003653649,0.00008383508,7.395149e-7,0.0025107826,0.4736175,0.00048194165,0.5207393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016826877,0.0016039158,0.11527552,0.010489914,0.00017110929,0.00012601781,0.000680965,0.0017445267,0.0010647367,0.20105647,0.66609937,0.0015191573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001019915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006325826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66561747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009098622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009450793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33859256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392560981","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001491","title":"Why Seeing Is Not Believing and Why Believing Is Seeing: On the Politics of Sight","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sight; Politics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.040724812187963665,"score_gpt":0.38004120838320876,"score_spread":0.3393163961952451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392560981","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095126584,0.048142366,0.00005805564,0.74819404,0.0005760057,0.0011183186,0.000068770205,0.00025331645,0.10646252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91057956,0.012275977,0.00021747829,0.07646254,0.00016332135,0.000018050945,3.6276683e-7,0.000015323581,0.00026735835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636626,0.00023841407,0.00048008695,0.0005702921,0.0010874564,0.0012574948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970529,0.0016016364,0.00014201619,0.00041333027,0.00023393003,0.0005561621],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019314158,0.00021192139,0.0004299392,0.00023859863,0.0013863884,0.00037329056,0.0007766729,0.000035564197,0.0006271647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022797284,0.00014868383,0.00021922603,0.002385113,0.0075120395,0.0004926557,0.00023793863,0.0003660789,0.00007491732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0107596e-7,0.000031477848,0.0005244608,0.00037007817,0.000023770112,0.000004888414,0.002719802,1.266045e-7,0.00023008017,0.97814614,0.0116397,0.00630857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033703152,0.00022708994,0.0015221577,0.006540286,0.00017900873,0.000019077168,0.00916955,0.00013996704,0.0005606383,0.008742536,0.9724477,0.0004183151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01040814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033806788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002162758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033059757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394923137","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000327","title":"Muddying the Waters: How Perceived Foreign Interference Affects Public Opinion on Protest Movements","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Interference (communication); Political science; Environmental science; Computer science; Telecommunications; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07774076246363833,"score_gpt":0.3950282917573228,"score_spread":0.3172875292936845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394923137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11769815,0.011375358,0.00045287455,0.63554555,0.0036301485,0.0059075807,0.000036359976,0.00084767904,0.2245063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98268336,0.007038349,0.00006447134,0.009265737,0.0005841743,0.00016951104,0.0000021210303,0.000012932191,0.00017932833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961769,0.0004911792,0.00019202198,0.0004658909,0.0010135792,0.0016604483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977447,0.0009552558,0.000067318106,0.0003125831,0.00012354412,0.00079660834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016335931,0.00018409517,0.00029794715,0.00009771094,0.0008664913,0.00069918745,0.0009666654,0.000036572117,0.00008787526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046466845,0.00011216934,0.00013384975,0.0017319903,0.0057360805,0.00046601435,0.00012909256,0.00030357458,0.00019287344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.140013e-7,0.00002631564,0.0006578135,0.00021692914,0.0000075461226,0.000003829038,0.0018001486,1.686789e-8,0.0000533177,0.907436,0.0009147467,0.08888258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014592276,0.00080780726,0.005924875,0.010988205,0.00006454744,0.000011101945,0.041857805,0.00016443542,0.0002802339,0.036389433,0.9024562,0.0009094012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001828206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003102452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9015415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005963892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010002833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99696976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396863959","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000388","title":"What Is Colonialism? The Dual Claims of a Twentieth-Century Political Category","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Politics; Dual (grammatical number); History; Political science; Art; Literature; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.036457158379839406,"score_gpt":0.38502613235116656,"score_spread":0.34856897397132713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396863959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078622796,0.13991734,0.00010942873,0.6923577,0.008213334,0.0027286597,0.00012757503,0.0005066556,0.0774165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430276,0.038731657,0.00006104555,0.016819,0.00031708545,0.000026926265,0.0000013230342,0.00001052108,0.0010048024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581933,0.00045756597,0.00043953693,0.0004747877,0.0011795909,0.0016291701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979704,0.00048599963,0.00009323294,0.00038851486,0.00016606697,0.0008957592],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031262257,0.00016663833,0.00042757016,0.00005182261,0.0007191636,0.0002572132,0.00069337164,0.00006256396,0.00062444806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046599525,0.00011253555,0.00032096435,0.0020398803,0.01998431,0.00071241177,0.00012454798,0.000354496,0.00018664778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.793088e-7,0.00003006204,0.00008012498,0.00023654605,0.000010197241,0.000007620534,0.0034473336,1.333257e-8,0.000014737368,0.9811366,0.008195906,0.006839888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004057173,0.00009020348,0.00072295306,0.0012230803,0.00013209753,0.000013552669,0.01918987,0.00000759623,0.000052737265,0.010870361,0.967405,0.00025196822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060423766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003781184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006829668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019937507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401340787","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000716","title":"Improving Probabilistic Models In Text Classification Via Active Learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Active learning (machine learning)","score_opus":0.038489093231234166,"score_gpt":0.328479701192705,"score_spread":0.2899906079614708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401340787","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030016284,0.0041413554,0.97552145,0.009504023,0.00014989922,0.00047157038,6.9354695e-7,0.0002753483,0.006934019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861433,0.00068059785,0.012104421,0.00092938053,0.0000397637,0.000061046434,4.6748565e-7,0.000007895767,0.000033142016],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972344,0.00013537558,0.00037469447,0.00082964357,0.0005096323,0.0009162367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988031,0.00023896682,0.00007356575,0.00047501747,0.000086509506,0.00032287868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013324226,0.00014294956,0.00028144027,0.00018062157,0.000111956455,0.00022162343,0.00095541315,0.000020415659,0.0000087215485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007715548,0.00011701118,0.00006419267,0.0025711847,0.0006818705,0.0012029087,0.00027926595,0.00034548072,0.00007653742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5233911e-7,0.000008415072,0.000009602577,0.00018510103,6.523752e-7,0.0000034407665,0.000054656124,0.0000860587,0.00017370048,0.48249605,0.000001939705,0.51698023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132992,0.000040947947,0.00040602474,0.00093863433,0.000007205252,0.000020084419,0.000043307613,0.96762335,0.00003409899,0.030103568,0.0005986861,0.00016274792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008165838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000863293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98314166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006389385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006234803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47715774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401341819","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000534","title":"Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Latin Americans; Colonialism; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Sociology; American political science; Field (mathematics); Transnationalism; Political science; Epistemology; Political economy; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059266310002994885,"score_gpt":0.41326213247941357,"score_spread":0.3539958224764187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401341819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26114655,0.0131840715,0.00031043685,0.5028549,0.00031841992,0.0010367294,0.00008284426,0.0003639152,0.22070214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845678,0.0065631247,0.00044271725,0.008047821,0.0002916368,0.000024529965,0.000002387148,0.000010826527,0.000049140144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964678,0.00038710132,0.0003765256,0.00057250843,0.0006653287,0.0015306845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735147,0.0010010453,0.0000470666,0.00017203824,0.000055789507,0.0013725813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022001667,0.0001733755,0.0004252653,0.00016032842,0.000355493,0.000213039,0.00021689961,0.00004777541,0.000033963486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024105662,0.00014535978,0.00006382068,0.0020079443,0.015991952,0.0004892794,0.00008239204,0.0004228736,0.000036213813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013361278,0.000022512695,0.0008844449,0.00022221048,0.0000020048528,0.000010056934,0.00028555494,1.8625414e-8,0.000011291924,0.9555854,0.0000233348,0.04295183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012998695,0.00031649807,0.09098811,0.003179078,0.00010008786,0.00003233268,0.0036261475,0.0005164686,0.000021135285,0.85816187,0.0422519,0.0006763904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009837475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028318513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7234213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003949553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005716757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402651212","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000662","title":"Han Feizi on Reputation-Driven Disobedience: A Comparative Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Singapore Management University; Nanyang Technological University; York University; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Reputation; Civil disobedience; Comparative research; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.09431456782558417,"score_gpt":0.5039281714267211,"score_spread":0.4096136036011369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402651212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8769843,0.006851991,0.00028884012,0.014529153,0.0012025102,0.0022561091,0.000044116707,0.0003316777,0.09751133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967604,0.00023470535,0.00016661576,0.0019609279,0.00007054791,0.00017981179,0.0000025699676,0.000008208406,0.0006161624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768925,0.00017492437,0.00031286138,0.00064493594,0.00044032204,0.0007376919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886507,0.00017680477,0.00005110018,0.00041070918,0.00006219802,0.00043414332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005930711,0.00015037892,0.00035430008,0.00012610732,0.00018481967,0.00009408954,0.00036061037,0.00001301219,0.0006257611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012820307,0.00010498254,0.00009219279,0.0019361599,0.0017806083,0.0001500023,0.00006133892,0.00020052324,0.0019477778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003997547,0.00077712646,0.002810937,0.00007952561,0.000019325202,0.000090619316,0.0017241257,4.0901443e-7,0.000033808257,0.86421275,0.0032913669,0.12695602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062686956,0.0101297,0.81123376,0.006731552,0.00079776405,0.00023489154,0.031362366,0.0004055338,0.00006284721,0.0042977883,0.1324298,0.001687151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007025016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016936228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85991496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001705431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001658038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403264585","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001059","title":"Climate Displacement and Territorial Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; McGill University","keywords":"Climate justice; Economic Justice; Displacement (psychology); Political science; Criminology; Climate change; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Geology","score_opus":0.08262932801357967,"score_gpt":0.42367881439149363,"score_spread":0.341049486377914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403264585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12642503,0.1301711,0.0027993075,0.4620651,0.014721412,0.005330425,0.0002719531,0.0016735959,0.25654206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88870937,0.104651466,0.00069183984,0.004080943,0.0015744242,0.0000618661,0.000007118452,0.000012868069,0.00021009835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977313,0.00013589577,0.00023224155,0.00036701123,0.0006638563,0.0008696406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892074,0.00030170576,0.00004538219,0.00013478078,0.000087724104,0.0005096797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002070406,0.00009975924,0.00019131711,0.00007017596,0.00054086273,0.0002855167,0.00020530951,0.000017625414,0.00012608584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011027114,0.00008171528,0.000042995496,0.001130346,0.0028392407,0.00043950326,0.000071534574,0.00008512576,0.000114355455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011789633,0.000012494892,0.00010986933,0.00053909456,0.0000019300621,0.0000027789151,0.00094197574,3.7331912e-8,0.000055266333,0.90659595,0.0007768591,0.09096258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008864149,0.0001537835,0.0027063442,0.0032379057,0.00031920325,0.0000102250815,0.008490311,0.0005616356,0.000033615437,0.0044530784,0.9795222,0.00042301725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038663389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007777026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004475696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004216094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404043574","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001060","title":"Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Wageningen University and Research; Universität Konstanz; Universiteit Antwerpen; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Universidade de Lisboa; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Tel Aviv University; Université de Lausanne; Vetenskapsrådet; Vlaamse regering; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Cambridge; Université de Genève; Göteborgs Universitet; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Univerzita Karlova v Praze; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Universität Basel; Universitetet i Bergen; University of Southern California","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Voting behavior; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.043317685865533896,"score_gpt":0.4429813996768992,"score_spread":0.3996637138113653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404043574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39419338,0.036803085,0.0012834395,0.1470489,0.0022174222,0.002922613,0.000103585444,0.0008992425,0.41452834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770594,0.00041542973,0.00009448988,0.001241631,0.00027001635,0.000043681062,8.4190435e-7,0.000008412537,0.00021954488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969863,0.00025430488,0.00042480128,0.00028848977,0.00074070925,0.0013053686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982781,0.0006082163,0.00006803824,0.00017201393,0.00019070173,0.0006829205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021997613,0.00010778935,0.0003388614,0.00009139303,0.00028185415,0.000100077064,0.00033855397,0.00002554484,0.00021983728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026538759,0.00008371083,0.00012049129,0.0018806307,0.0057965964,0.0003048089,0.000044321503,0.000121602025,0.00010757421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.8450475e-7,0.000018499357,0.0025694417,0.00029996157,0.0000025380739,0.0000025826876,0.00014601063,2.2620794e-8,0.00008423855,0.97938746,0.00007285655,0.01741608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022827652,0.0011524478,0.11175963,0.025387067,0.0011639438,0.000050857594,0.0056223506,0.00031341577,0.0034407817,0.44018754,0.40834555,0.0023481231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029734293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003664698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6035126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029971715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009511949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404245593","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001072","title":"Structural Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07569748917997438,"score_gpt":0.4579720543177422,"score_spread":0.3822745651377678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404245593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018950934,0.018550448,0.00007337525,0.3600466,0.00080815953,0.0005387969,0.000030410787,0.0005290925,0.6004722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98217964,0.0028444403,0.00023842305,0.014064211,0.0003973718,0.000010776202,7.247978e-7,0.0000070582787,0.0002573729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960958,0.00042613895,0.00029566567,0.00051251834,0.0010310882,0.0016388034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714154,0.00095270784,0.000027637228,0.00034928077,0.00014754475,0.001381279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047260565,0.00012702805,0.00028953262,0.00008564723,0.000658389,0.00020183482,0.0006406727,0.00003844818,0.00040230475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00816668,0.00009658809,0.00014305871,0.0024501046,0.016338712,0.00047071648,0.000108182096,0.0003740448,0.0004833166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010263325,0.0000052644323,0.00004101684,0.00017998784,0.0000020852876,0.000008043119,0.00015712377,1.7413718e-8,0.000007552091,0.9705224,0.00026149192,0.02881396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018678662,0.00005670206,0.0018889877,0.0009956331,0.000037673683,0.000009114138,0.000283059,0.000058020247,0.000021513619,0.71842307,0.2779578,0.00024977204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044342037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007382751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005912792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002393746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98633826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404592370","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001102","title":"The Global Network of Liberty: Toward a New Framework for Understanding the History of Political Concepts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.09847930858409717,"score_gpt":0.4387913795112111,"score_spread":0.3403120709271139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404592370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056534854,0.19552459,0.13635795,0.3000781,0.00465364,0.0026497955,0.00008673322,0.0002527959,0.35983106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98454607,0.0036439209,0.0011916847,0.009700845,0.0005549918,0.000027668131,3.3210694e-7,0.000009135935,0.00032532748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959756,0.00036632532,0.0005509425,0.0003475626,0.00080973614,0.0019498394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928631,0.005530211,0.00013504163,0.00039716339,0.00012291547,0.0009515509],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040185256,0.00015443505,0.00045360537,0.000017687851,0.0004504489,0.00007833603,0.0012083569,0.000054041488,0.00007520515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009208155,0.00008654455,0.00029225653,0.0014997419,0.025649043,0.0002193107,0.00013368674,0.0002287104,0.000014396113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006039464,0.00000974454,0.000053684245,0.00016020663,0.000012993309,6.5492196e-7,0.0003265117,2.5402704e-7,9.0736023e-7,0.98522973,0.00228236,0.011916923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021207257,0.00008129046,0.000088458975,0.0012245739,0.000059147624,0.000002348578,0.0014048738,0.000030569263,0.0000032069677,0.76317716,0.23381385,0.00009334262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027696793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003377513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002637468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052287825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405116271","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001205","title":"Gendered Perceptions and the Costs of Political Toxicity: Experimental Evidence from Politicians and Citizens in Four Democracies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Göteborgs Universitet; Queen's University; Universitetet i Oslo; Queen's University Belfast; King's College London","keywords":"Hostility; Politics; Prejudice (legal term); Perception; Face (sociological concept); Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.060368031857341936,"score_gpt":0.4100688946110223,"score_spread":0.3497008627536804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405116271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8765192,0.031790417,0.00021674122,0.07826825,0.00015791052,0.0007514732,0.00005015986,0.000050072817,0.012195794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98629487,0.010781186,0.00029414217,0.0024222182,0.000118450385,0.00003404238,8.645478e-7,0.0000075264575,0.000046699868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697745,0.00048746026,0.00038638868,0.0004319436,0.0006391282,0.001077634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976119,0.0014196399,0.000051896433,0.00020983272,0.000085327556,0.0006214363],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015281861,0.00013739974,0.0003839979,0.000115166375,0.00035684905,0.0001822229,0.00029014316,0.00003442922,0.00007050568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017455174,0.00009468362,0.00008292722,0.00079187384,0.013109311,0.00028824067,0.00016335711,0.0001665324,0.000008948559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025695697,0.000017012731,0.002229401,0.000073378294,0.0000062521535,0.0000049743544,0.0025231738,7.021438e-8,0.00039123063,0.99123114,0.00003291758,0.0034879018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011324065,0.0004140649,0.37873656,0.01274733,0.00053186377,0.00016210745,0.21043144,0.0024074155,0.0018559848,0.3877273,0.0024783264,0.0013752232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059088714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006916722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6035038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038369006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005840211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98957646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407582282","doi":"10.1017/s000305542500005x","title":"What Is the Wrong of Capitalism?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; American University in Cairo; Yale University; Uppsala Universitet; University of Cambridge; Princeton University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Capitalism; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Economic system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04465522094723426,"score_gpt":0.4267242512993052,"score_spread":0.38206903035207096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407582282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002463293,0.020883765,0.000047564743,0.66090983,0.00041637692,0.0003808808,0.0000068606146,0.00003453647,0.31485686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8841042,0.03461156,0.000059314185,0.08068723,0.00008432552,0.000013259406,2.2058319e-7,0.0000027597362,0.00043715964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726915,0.00029514515,0.0003249703,0.00027281765,0.0007804668,0.0010574734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979335,0.00088048057,0.00008480619,0.00041981143,0.00024215288,0.0004392666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030304622,0.0000987308,0.0003207443,0.000055590157,0.0006148684,0.0001097652,0.0010320776,0.000033073,0.0001317515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030796116,0.00006325915,0.00014121948,0.002137494,0.021183897,0.00046122225,0.00015196948,0.00021609676,0.00005723866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.3011664e-7,0.000017799432,0.000056027795,0.00011506151,0.0000037413934,3.6917078e-7,0.00045875314,1.5616301e-8,0.0000043638347,0.98084575,0.000602205,0.0178955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004281743,0.00004131559,0.001479427,0.002265144,0.00008010561,9.215393e-7,0.005688377,0.0000069711987,0.00019419593,0.72176796,0.2682651,0.00016763317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067575215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000631331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88164085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001917466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013113663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410970754","doi":"10.1017/s0003055425000218","title":"Unconditional Loyalty: The Survival of Minority Autocracies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autocracy; Loyalty; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025364861750917112,"score_gpt":0.40382832763626253,"score_spread":0.3784634658853454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410970754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070367656,0.003925291,0.00014684098,0.15300067,0.0003275871,0.0004206947,0.00006722671,0.00005135393,0.8350236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98187345,0.0023091636,0.000097712844,0.012791599,0.00011218882,0.00002267467,0.0000013428339,0.0000019225997,0.0027899572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728054,0.00024181987,0.000315523,0.00024726504,0.0009231777,0.0009916913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813837,0.0008028664,0.00012221634,0.0003068053,0.0002737441,0.00035599805],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022247045,0.000100502766,0.0003364935,0.00004298856,0.000562579,0.000046051915,0.0009030684,0.00002093289,0.00020476145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051101726,0.00006663538,0.00012533483,0.0019356288,0.015098439,0.00016712229,0.00013064733,0.00014694754,0.00003886079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.646213e-7,0.000022821929,0.0022166227,0.00008456446,0.0000041105804,4.255233e-7,0.00004145357,2.8305182e-8,0.000005146073,0.9865873,0.0011938325,0.00984285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005401334,0.000029977089,0.083196245,0.00045327653,0.00005011426,6.453219e-7,0.00050682295,0.0000069187427,0.000058894206,0.051292296,0.86421824,0.00013255919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01578039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044341243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97483665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002383235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021014747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415299814","doi":"10.1017/s000305542510124x","title":"Institutional Forbearance as a Mechanism of Democratic Stability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Forbearance; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Mechanism (biology); Power (physics); Politics","score_opus":0.02900159916371926,"score_gpt":0.3782161330085528,"score_spread":0.34921453384483353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415299814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030336162,0.009633424,0.0017847742,0.0374826,0.00029309775,0.0009727127,0.000011503786,0.000071882685,0.91941386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841222,0.008463433,0.00088018924,0.0061635543,0.000023667875,0.000039547336,4.814494e-7,0.0000013529632,0.00030555553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982109,0.000098143406,0.00034072268,0.0002953731,0.0004268607,0.0006279843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990977,0.00016633389,0.00009672778,0.00017315321,0.00022213209,0.00024396136],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016389977,0.00009239897,0.0003720893,0.00005243864,0.00070237013,0.000024963885,0.00039343716,0.000016767106,0.00013613557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029982855,0.00007396228,0.00008265181,0.0014719733,0.0066378317,0.00020164228,0.000106079904,0.000071356924,0.000035284254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010063313,0.000030124784,0.0012314407,0.00015115114,0.000005594233,3.5181088e-7,0.00017018212,2.7400619e-8,0.000010625514,0.9894309,0.00018312702,0.008785474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023573972,0.00011648829,0.028494768,0.0028295633,0.000100125995,0.0000035267692,0.007064299,0.000017422537,0.0008790967,0.7459164,0.21384014,0.0005023861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00374574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037793434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034852212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023382297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99606556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415907474","doi":"10.1017/s0003055425101263","title":"How Firms, Bureaucrats, and Ministries Benefit from the Revolving Door: Evidence from Japan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University; University of Tokyo; University of Toronto; Yale University; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Copenhagen Business School; American Political Science Association; Center for Global Partnership","keywords":"Revolving door; Bureaucracy; Cognitive reframing; Civil servants; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Elite","score_opus":0.03321595315554937,"score_gpt":0.29967625486341976,"score_spread":0.2664603017078704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415907474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50593567,0.10056162,0.00024088095,0.36982253,0.00037801632,0.00082811806,0.00006822928,0.00022203251,0.021942921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94381934,0.0073744166,0.00019672276,0.047996208,0.00041492574,0.000032204905,0.000008591747,0.0000076874185,0.00014987611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760264,0.000026233773,0.00034211107,0.000609394,0.00045324303,0.00096637284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814516,0.0007645613,0.00018160375,0.00057765574,0.00022196422,0.00010903088],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005482744,0.0002499997,0.00047404633,0.00006646209,0.0005135647,0.0014948141,0.00092990766,0.00003148175,0.0000730239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026394485,0.00015754072,0.00009010208,0.0017058392,0.004319079,0.0018955513,0.0004680718,0.00020278433,0.000072956835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044903054,0.000015353571,0.018933702,0.0002534967,0.000014539282,0.0000040358464,0.000010620347,9.013804e-8,0.00019111982,0.9304066,0.0025559817,0.04761003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016183192,0.00004141575,0.32520816,0.012493802,0.0005424729,0.000003087321,0.0029225084,0.0002985094,0.00018225722,0.47044238,0.18691328,0.0007902765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036346775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027160085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45996416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007320592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021901936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416727698","doi":"10.1017/s0003055425101299","title":"Attitudinal and Behavioral Legacies of Wartime Violence: A Meta-Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Hostility; Cohesion (chemistry); Psychological intervention; Politics; Identification (biology); Spanish Civil War","score_opus":0.10414079017648785,"score_gpt":0.5045191794016735,"score_spread":0.4003783892251856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416727698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4360495,0.15586324,0.0010921549,0.17425294,0.0005345211,0.0016699159,0.0000690701,0.00019954676,0.2302691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98856604,0.007043764,0.00028914164,0.0037477189,0.000019167452,0.000028548719,4.061072e-7,0.0000017564216,0.0003034746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979791,0.000249263,0.0003388233,0.0003462109,0.0004265395,0.0006600803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990265,0.00016481036,0.00011832316,0.00021479411,0.00018913111,0.00028648056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015428475,0.00010285128,0.0009049699,0.00016975398,0.00031081177,0.000038183578,0.00043652605,0.000026076705,0.00043755694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005189468,0.00007522663,0.00045396708,0.003931779,0.011045133,0.00017729464,0.000102345686,0.00009123622,0.000011846433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001922391,0.000086177584,0.005540486,0.00005533292,0.0014131451,0.0000011376145,0.00025870735,2.852078e-8,0.000041880663,0.9676559,0.0001984822,0.0247468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004663561,0.0013145037,0.2917096,0.0012211453,0.39616087,0.00001064484,0.019323163,0.000033548946,0.0004930667,0.11468778,0.17279188,0.0017874467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017704602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042803993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8529681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008537869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029872474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99164623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}