{"meta":{"query_hash":"9f03820c47a4","filters":{"venue":"American Review of Politics"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9f03820c47a4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+Review+of+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W2225797527","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.193-220","title":"Southern Distinctiveness over Time, 1972-2000","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; White (mutation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Urbanity; Race (biology); History; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01593187858304353,"score_gpt":0.2999044835797708,"score_spread":0.2839726049967273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225797527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99076664,0.0009441828,0.00006574159,0.000776495,0.000026154863,0.0000065026475,0.0006520706,0.0000034153204,0.0067587607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968977,0.0007911981,0.000051940788,0.000119937155,0.000031760643,0.000005914209,0.00058307196,0.0000023296834,0.0015163011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974114,0.000052512096,0.0000133671265,0.00007016302,0.000060553673,0.000062306455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827445,0.00023025706,0.00073833665,0.00010342307,0.0003502196,0.00030338563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009036496,0.00010938043,0.00013594025,0.0014891083,0.0006114988,0.0005612024,0.00018774801,0.00024543615,0.0023380592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002482847,0.00007882119,0.00009644723,0.002629307,0.0005249067,0.00062342547,0.00088555645,0.00037951136,0.00021730021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102312966,0.000032523476,0.93739694,0.00009873105,0.000051133484,0.00012411432,0.01265222,0.00019393381,0.0005495564,0.0019984345,0.0035746358,0.043225367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001036235,0.000014085896,0.9906487,0.000013733024,0.000006398349,0.000029059867,0.002188107,0.000028067783,0.00006569322,0.000099026685,0.0069041247,0.0000020121608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05136564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108151965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05136564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001368291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056421396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10213333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507930443","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2008.29.0.291-309","title":"George W. Bush and the Reckoning of American Conservatism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Presidency; Populism; Political science; Opposition (politics); Politics; Mainstream; Political economy; Dominance (genetics); Conservative government; Politics of the United States; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.014061496240890325,"score_gpt":0.33923062074307225,"score_spread":0.32516912450218194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507930443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047187693,0.3020556,0.0006295248,0.5152712,0.0033034354,0.000007298006,0.000027436188,0.000014919712,0.13150294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8167819,0.123252936,0.0004719474,0.037955962,0.0029589662,0.000012144684,0.000023802617,0.000026568505,0.018515697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866617,0.0007737332,0.000025713793,0.00010774977,0.00030033226,0.00012629667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882334,0.0006949107,0.0001259874,0.000081326514,0.00014449126,0.00012983501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018286592,0.00014026302,0.00025534045,0.0011927037,0.00272746,0.0044683055,0.00029609315,0.0015647977,0.0014040846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026244847,0.00014720827,0.000112335714,0.0011596665,0.011143756,0.0033377078,0.0014352984,0.003253201,0.00018462764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004710503,0.000029418796,0.002979409,0.00030040412,0.000031823987,0.00021576448,0.008727556,0.00013293664,0.00034587187,0.8666513,0.064575076,0.055963397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013708536,0.000016856384,0.007059569,0.0006214613,0.000014945242,0.00016430355,0.008443877,0.0001067716,0.00020254968,0.30566362,0.6776767,0.000015637494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008714152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018152205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008714152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029692787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036845203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021543741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517047995","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2008.29.0.197-213","title":"By Order of George W. Bush: The Unilateral Directives of a Unilateralist President","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Presidential system; Executive order; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Executive branch; Management; History; Politics; Business; Art history; Economics","score_opus":0.020793407953157594,"score_gpt":0.33109013626798534,"score_spread":0.31029672831482774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517047995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25559744,0.024297107,0.0065008756,0.22770803,0.0038302273,0.00004069975,0.0000525056,0.000041419487,0.48193163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95975864,0.0040561333,0.0008255015,0.013692056,0.00043392403,0.000014753858,0.000014720421,0.00001439891,0.021189814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573886,0.0024437036,0.00010238803,0.00035623796,0.00092165935,0.00043705085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968548,0.0016901729,0.000446516,0.00020717984,0.00046026596,0.00034107463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043713963,0.00010337255,0.00021394179,0.0003899589,0.005017173,0.0029406126,0.00041008706,0.0021139053,0.0011315725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078805685,0.00018156486,0.00012463566,0.0006635554,0.010426694,0.0025342507,0.0014640933,0.0044262465,0.0002909304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023394823,0.000017312326,0.0014532676,0.000088696914,0.000008903739,0.00030653257,0.01692213,0.00009899405,0.00067827804,0.9388834,0.020133045,0.021385964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029889365,0.00005981121,0.010956023,0.00030554392,0.000020252084,0.000649264,0.020659717,0.00024732845,0.0012429549,0.14022717,0.82554674,0.000055349672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014732488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036671445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014732488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003702061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042392113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029293478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519712619","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.305-318","title":"Timing an Election: The Impact on the Party in Government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honeymoon; General election; Government (linguistics); Presidential system; Power (physics); Political science; Term (time); Period (music); Presidential election; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05756681879634782,"score_gpt":0.4132747712533459,"score_spread":0.35570795245699804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519712619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8494186,0.0021271622,0.001530928,0.004526032,0.00029410978,0.000054638665,0.00055906514,0.000037117654,0.14145234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945475,0.00040948915,0.00017348354,0.00017515646,0.00012209166,0.000012081162,0.00012072599,0.000018760718,0.004420716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959875,0.0020038125,0.00016958383,0.00029279917,0.0006995173,0.0008467587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775549,0.011308682,0.004143424,0.0006166795,0.0014467998,0.0049294573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00481315,0.00013582403,0.00034537716,0.0011387044,0.001405223,0.0034639451,0.00047661536,0.0008181211,0.025126012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021069705,0.00013242783,0.00039100027,0.0020687918,0.0010536556,0.0014681135,0.0017488418,0.0017333531,0.0025240004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003237082,0.0007172321,0.7261212,0.00038944057,0.0003567245,0.0007956481,0.006382806,0.0026199108,0.0038698677,0.10696949,0.010637479,0.13790314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012764799,0.0006243017,0.9162438,0.00014395961,0.00013890988,0.00030935078,0.0072557153,0.00076393806,0.00071843434,0.018374976,0.0552553,0.00004370218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005934298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011048111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025126012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015969799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016374555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08405489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523642679","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.89-91","title":"Introduction: About This Special Issue (The Continuing Transformation of Southern Politics)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Brother; Quarter (Canadian coin); Library science; Classics; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013695061547935051,"score_gpt":0.26787940185163384,"score_spread":0.2541843403036988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523642679","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003239078,0.15750988,0.00038010473,0.11609106,0.6750572,0.0001122836,0.001472641,0.00029667377,0.048756313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030731712,0.124886334,0.00037997827,0.07942675,0.6785844,0.00021699956,0.0021166774,0.00027145183,0.11104425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870634,0.000196576,0.00009781376,0.00022497542,0.00062792114,0.00014637572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934683,0.001539054,0.0006568252,0.0003065296,0.0026420662,0.0013872638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018866936,0.0014776889,0.0014244472,0.0038979023,0.0016175399,0.008672693,0.0016064522,0.0041775736,0.106270604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077604842,0.0005368446,0.001065361,0.0044591054,0.0010872813,0.004338508,0.0015283732,0.0043760496,0.062731706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070775127,0.000005673626,0.00008221361,0.00020011918,0.0000038961807,0.000008805336,0.0000125755505,0.000007097953,0.000025904914,0.00048406448,0.9909407,0.008222007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074458785,0.000012686647,0.0007594974,0.0005202458,0.0000084080075,0.000041598312,0.000043245876,0.000013080143,0.000017461583,0.00073490886,0.9978338,0.0000075481753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023768062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040059057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106270604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022569227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003139545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3555106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}