{"meta":{"query_hash":"9f03820c47a4","filters":{"venue":"American Review of Politics"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9f03820c47a4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=American+Review+of+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W2225797527","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.193-220","title":"Southern Distinctiveness over Time, 1972-2000","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; White (mutation); Quarter (Canadian coin); Urbanity; Race (biology); History; Gender studies; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01593187858304353,"score_gpt":0.2999044835797708,"score_spread":0.2839726049967273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225797527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19806951,0.15709496,0.000068095855,0.0049092844,0.0005074497,0.00089283223,0.000246267,0.00020364134,0.63800794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8883924,0.077418,0.00021460974,0.0068334187,0.0015988002,0.000026805472,0.0000137025645,0.000040596813,0.025461655],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987764,0.00022632552,0.0002312443,0.00013070159,0.0003070249,0.00032832628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992273,0.0001815766,0.00020508996,0.00015845487,0.00009079149,0.00013682821],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002460573,0.00009731548,0.00034848292,0.000018629833,0.00015764133,0.000010319563,0.00020308005,0.000031138567,0.0028428645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023518848,0.00008760184,0.00014369957,0.00038616962,0.0010027145,0.00004522229,0.00003018734,0.00008155555,0.0004088343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010711629,0.0007483306,0.019310927,0.003002192,0.00024288548,0.000024113115,0.08387263,0.0000018884249,0.000029830459,0.21834652,0.10217738,0.5722326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015556584,0.00012781209,0.004074085,0.0018419643,0.00014462591,0.0000012372658,0.004928747,0.00004088436,0.000007537802,0.0025740766,0.98566836,0.00043507756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00389988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005562554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009423414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007695311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507930443","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2008.29.0.291-309","title":"George W. Bush and the Reckoning of American Conservatism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Presidency; Populism; Political science; Opposition (politics); Politics; Mainstream; Political economy; Dominance (genetics); Conservative government; Politics of the United States; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.014061496240890325,"score_gpt":0.33923062074307225,"score_spread":0.32516912450218194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507930443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8403053,0.03850504,0.0001629906,0.05837341,0.00022513198,0.0013334284,0.000066176064,0.00008717721,0.060941298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90116066,0.0760964,0.002385491,0.019762136,0.00009419084,0.000006493589,0.0000033515394,0.000010571182,0.00048068032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981741,0.00048148408,0.00047639525,0.00014895565,0.00038251036,0.00033660032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983056,0.00041107772,0.00073551066,0.00029876962,0.0001365206,0.00011247754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010271505,0.000113548485,0.00062951015,0.000039495746,0.00016399882,0.000011547474,0.0003104998,0.000015910666,0.000023978793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010702746,0.0000800927,0.000098409815,0.0004989308,0.0039492664,0.00006288618,0.000037981474,0.00010132152,0.0000027952965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009817551,0.00007860694,0.012321952,0.00052676967,0.00007051083,0.0000028800007,0.0061895237,2.5019813e-7,0.00005582582,0.86308074,0.0042231353,0.113439985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016627176,0.000822968,0.17856008,0.010648855,0.000660616,0.000008213233,0.013197209,0.000036039586,0.00041352145,0.04774519,0.74531996,0.0009246554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022046674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014407746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8153356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046430996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016428118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517047995","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2008.29.0.197-213","title":"By Order of George W. Bush: The Unilateral Directives of a Unilateralist President","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Presidential system; Executive order; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Executive branch; Management; History; Politics; Business; Art history; Economics","score_opus":0.020793407953157594,"score_gpt":0.33109013626798534,"score_spread":0.31029672831482774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517047995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6284071,0.04902995,0.00012169227,0.03992335,0.00050426915,0.0022826912,0.00097565027,0.00012396926,0.2786313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760702,0.020140896,0.00025876838,0.0020174598,0.00011855985,0.000011280667,0.000009754608,0.000017713146,0.0013553619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975607,0.00060984795,0.00067007047,0.00017403733,0.0005488436,0.00043653563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980334,0.00040620033,0.0005120183,0.0004159948,0.00045847328,0.00017389382],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000410007,0.00015346317,0.00066017243,0.00005045808,0.00014346669,0.0000046980913,0.000494792,0.000034966062,0.00011120034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096958346,0.000111415364,0.00018004607,0.00061476504,0.004664061,0.00008995966,0.000086321794,0.00012000018,0.0000061456885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011298423,0.00041352352,0.013458793,0.0026676303,0.00018792394,0.000006845981,0.00966773,0.000002522615,0.0003739897,0.959536,0.012479574,0.0011941527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007611005,0.001044507,0.040759616,0.0075097852,0.00062773254,0.000023376306,0.0035182838,0.000016506672,0.009390713,0.046318024,0.8888447,0.0011856531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021536611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000063497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91321796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006449358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032415785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519712619","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.305-318","title":"Timing an Election: The Impact on the Party in Government","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honeymoon; General election; Government (linguistics); Presidential system; Power (physics); Political science; Term (time); Period (music); Presidential election; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05756681879634782,"score_gpt":0.4132747712533459,"score_spread":0.35570795245699804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519712619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85169876,0.0028787623,0.000026549715,0.019289885,0.00016789019,0.00093009573,0.000015206438,0.000021052474,0.12497182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648565,0.00075551245,0.000009825215,0.0024325883,0.00009669807,0.00002406123,5.163095e-7,0.0000045740458,0.00019055183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980516,0.0010031029,0.00023272954,0.00008094587,0.00033043983,0.00030120692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991581,0.00038333106,0.00013814014,0.0001958497,0.000039920953,0.000084691535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011681576,0.00006874804,0.0001741477,0.0000073272954,0.00015981322,0.000014650459,0.000120126235,0.000014134811,0.0001776483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007637405,0.00003355048,0.00007022346,0.00031687578,0.00029763582,0.000039161823,0.000004811427,0.000095642776,0.000014043819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001487028,0.00007566366,0.00977974,0.00007479324,0.0000105321815,4.632978e-7,0.00081388315,0.000007589039,0.000013375251,0.98487055,0.0020526776,0.0022992305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039457338,0.0026710876,0.17853947,0.0051530977,0.00020540091,0.000009979459,0.013232179,0.00026937295,0.0018445114,0.038123645,0.7586102,0.00094653177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020141592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081823475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94674695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023063568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012190857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523642679","doi":"10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.89-91","title":"Introduction: About This Special Issue (The Continuing Transformation of Southern Politics)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Brother; Quarter (Canadian coin); Library science; Classics; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013695061547935051,"score_gpt":0.26787940185163384,"score_spread":0.2541843403036988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523642679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04428818,0.021284172,0.0000735516,0.07270462,0.0013980562,0.0006473444,0.00024387219,0.000058020414,0.85930216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8160641,0.0852542,0.00041905182,0.008883018,0.039916746,0.00002479431,0.00002551109,0.000038799964,0.04937377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986711,0.00015703424,0.00051289727,0.00010959494,0.00020975151,0.00033963015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991931,0.00010229277,0.0002748698,0.00018992384,0.00011398757,0.00012585465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004316534,0.00009238349,0.0003850968,0.00003624835,0.00016070454,0.00000880382,0.00021532706,0.000028792267,0.008754636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002509294,0.00007401543,0.00016612452,0.00015455832,0.0015395015,0.00007775316,0.0000102385175,0.00009654966,0.00052684086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029528403,0.000105786086,0.00011587813,0.0013496823,0.000047457244,6.446938e-7,0.06605233,8.8948246e-7,0.000007478256,0.7070108,0.11520807,0.110098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059991573,0.000047109283,0.000037481474,0.00027897794,0.00005344533,0.0000014226191,0.004602768,0.000009916541,0.000020448275,0.0008059006,0.993998,0.00008456465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023697163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046243964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008757978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004421765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}